Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3974 Resolution - Adopting the Local Road Safety Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 3974 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, ADOPTING THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN. WHEREAS, in early 2020, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) issued a call for projects for approximately $25 million of federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds, and WHEREAS, the HSIP funds are distributed by WSDOT to assist with their City Safety Program, and WHEREAS, the goal of the City Safety Program is to reduce fatal and serious crashes on city and town streets using engineering improvements and countermeasures; and WHEREAS, to be eligible to apply for HSIP grant funds, cities are required to have a Local Road Safety Plan that identifies locations of fatal and serious injury crashes and addresses systemic safety needs within the jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco had their first Local Road Safety Plan prepared and identified two qualifying projects from the Plan that enabled the City to submit grant applications for the HSIP funding. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the Local Road Improvement Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, is hereby approved by the City of Pasco. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this 201h day of July, 2020. Saul Martinez Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Barham, CMC :rr F on Law, PLLC City Clerk Cttorney Resolution —Local Road Improvement Plan - 1 2020 Safety asco 1 an* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................•..................................................................................................... 2 STEP 1: ANALYZE SUMMARY DATA TO IDENTIFY FOCUS/PRIORITIES...................................................................2 DATAANALYSIS OVERVIEW.........................................................................................................................................2 COMMONCOLLISION TYPES........................................................................................................................................6 STEP 2: ANALYZE INDIVIDUAL FATAL/SERIOUS CRASHES TO IDENTIFY RISK FACTORS ....................................... 8 STEP 3: SELECT MOST COMMON RISK FACTORS................................................................................................ 10 STEP 4: ANALYZE ROADWAY NETWORK FOR PRESENCE OF RISK FACTORS ...................................................... 11 STEP 5: CREATE PRIORITIZED LIST OF ROADWAY LOCATIONS........................................................................... 11 STEP 6 & 7: IDENTIFY COUNTERMEASURES TO ADDRESS PRIORITIZED LOCATIONS AND DEVELOP A PRIORITIZED LIST OF PROJECTS............................................................................................................................ 14 N ROAD 28 & W SYLVESTER STREET........................................................................................................................... 15 S 1 OTH AVENUE & W LEWIS STREET............................................................................................................................ 19 W SYLVESTER STREET (BETWEEN N ROAD 36 & N 1 OTH AVENUE).................................................................................... 22 W SYLVESTER STREET EXTENDED CORRIDOR (BETWEEN N ROAD 54 & N 3RD AVENUE) .................................................... 26 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX A. COLLISION MAPS BY TYPE............................................................................................................ 29 APPENDIX B. BENEFIT -COST RATIO CALCULATIONS..........................................................................................35 APPENDIX C. PRIORITY LOCATION COLLISION ANALYSIS................................................................................ 41 LIMITATIONS ON USE Under 23 U.S. Code Sections 148 and 409, safety data, reports, surveys, schedules, or lists compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential crash sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway -highway crossings are not subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data. PREPARED BY DKS ASSOCIATES Brian Chandler, National Director for Transportation Safety Veronica Sullivan, Transportation Engineer and Planner Sam Garcia-Birginal, Transportation Engineer Caleb Trapp, Engineering Assistant MSI Arc O I ('� Al1)' 1'1 /1\ PAGE 1 1 The City of Pasco is committed to reducing the number and severity of roadway collisions on its city streets. The City has developed this City Road Safety Plan using the framework established in Washington State's Target Zero effort to provide data driven collision reduction strategies on the City's roads. The purpose of the City Road Safety Plan is to analyze crash data in the City in order to effectively identify trends, contributing factors, associated risk factors, and deficiencies present in the City's road network. Following this approach allows for the effective identification of appropriate, low cost countermeasures to be implemented for the purpose of crash reduction. The correlation of crash trends to the associated contributing factors, risk factors, and roadway deficiencies supports efficiency in identifying the need for crash reduction strategies as well as the implementation of specific infrastructure -based countermeasures to reduce the risk of crashes resulting in serious injuries or fatalities. The following plan includes a summary of existing safety conditions in Pasco, identification of safety needs, and recommended treatments to address high-priority collision types and locations. To effectively prevent future collisions on the City's roadways, the City must first understand the history of those collisions and other related sources of potential risk. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) provided the following data sets. 1. WSDOT City Safety Summary, 2014-2018 (provided by Ed Spilker, WSDOT Local Programs) 2. WSDOT database of all crashes on City of Pasco Roads, 2014-2018 (provided by Julie Brown, WSDOT Transportation Data, GIS & Modeling) DATA ANALYSIS OVERVIEW As illustrated in Figure 1, over the past 10 years the number of fatal and serious injury collisions in the City has ranged from 4 to 12 crashes annually. After a peak of 12 crashes in 2015 and 2016, that number decreased the following years to 8 in 2018. The general trend since 2009 is a slight increase. The total number of reported crashes per year (regardless of severity) has steadily increased from 519 in 2009 to 860 in 2018 (with a high of 882 reported collisions in 2016). The 5 -year average of 2009-2013 increased 46% to the 5 -year average of 2014-2018. MMPAGE 2 4111111010f Pasco: Fatal and Serious injury Crashes 15 10 10 12 12 11 10 5 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2056 2017 2058 Pasco: All Crashes 1,000 800 537 549 519 600 400 .•.•...• 200 0 775 882 826 860 559 551 620 , , .... . ........ ............ .. ...•.. . ..•.. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 FIGURE 1. COLLISIONS IN PASCO, 2014-2018 Data and graphics: WSDOT Figure 2 shows a heat map of all reported collisions by frequency. Figure 3 points out the location of each crash and identifies fatal and serious injury collisions. MEi , PAGE 3 r—t hd Ima m I I � 1 SandifurPkwy s tit a B," Rd 0 It F _ * A4" M1 S t� P h Argto-l]M't it `�pw.. • • le _ _ �Y�Nermri � --" • w.f _ $ .y 'i NLk S1r ' Sylvester St p • • ? �c • • • • - x q,t wrM • ASt 3 Frequency of Crashes -tet . `°a'"°'a qn Faw N Q Value :, onnMc ON: ^ x �'Vn o Swot hSra. � High w.a �:... .. Low�c��n .:.. ..�... .. ..,. 'I k kennew c o U.5 t = 2 Mileo'n..a., FIGURE 2. ALL REPORTED CRASHES, PASCO-MAINTAINED STREETS, 2014-2018 Data: WSDOT. Graphics: DKS Associates mmPAGE 4 1', '• •• % • •�•••`' • ••�•w ••+irx•�P' : •• ' • 10 X .00 • • �• i • • r a� � • \ e• wA, • Legend ••. Crash Severity (2014-2018) A9 Other Crashes henoe+, r • Suspected Serious Injury X Fatality ,. sources: Esn, FERE, Gamin, Intennap, increment P Cwp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NR,,�AN, 0 0.5 1 2 ft4ihes G-Base;AGN KM -W, NL, Ordnance Survey, Esn Japan, MET[, EM Chi. (Mang Kong).s.iystnpa.0 Oper.Str Wap—trbutom, and die MS (her Community r A FIGURE 3. CRASHES BY SEVERITY, PASCO-MAINTAINED STREETS, 2014-2018 Data: WSDOT. Graphics: DKS Associates maPASCO LM -Al ROAD SAFELY IPAGE 5 L COMMON COLLISION TYPES All Crash Severities A total of 3,984 crashes occurred within the City of Pasco over the past 5 years (2014-2018), an average of 797 crashes each year. Common crash types included the following: • 1,159 rear -end crashes (29% of crashes) • 1,087 entering at angle crashes (27% of crashes) • 54 pedestrian -related crashes (1.4% of crashes) o 26 bicycle -related crashes (0.01% of crashes) Collisions within the City of Pasco were typically not severe, though several fatal and serious injury crashes occurred: 7 crashes resulted in fatalities • 43 crashes resulted in serious injuries The five most common driver errors and road user behaviors were responsible for nearly 65% of all crashes in Pasco, including: 1. 1,019 Inattention (26%) 2. 627 Did Not Yield Right -of -Way (16%) 3. 561 Followed Too Closely (14%) 4. 225 Improper Turn or U-turn (6%) 5. 175 Speeding (4%) 6. 141 Alcohol or Drug Use (3.5%) 7. 121 Disregard Stop and Go Light (3%) MEF,ASC-_; i 0f_A[ POAI) SA[ L I Y F[f, d PAGE 6 Fatal and Serious Injury Collisions Figure 4 shows the City of Pasco's most common collision types that resulted in fatal and serious injury collisions from 2014 to 2018. Following is a description of the Top 5 types. 1. Angle (T) was involved in 32% of fatal/serious collision and more than 27% of all collisions. Pasco has 11% more angle (T) collisions than Average Eastside Cities (cities east of the Cascade Range) 2. Hit Pedestrian includes crashes involving a person walking along the roadway or crossing the road. Pedestrian collisions were only 1% of all crashes (regardless of severity), but 16% of fatal and serious injury collisions, which shows the potential for harm in these crashes. 3. Angle (Left Turn) collisions were a part of 10% of all fatal/serious and total collisions. 4. Roadway Departure (Fixed Object and Overturn) contributed to 22% of fatal and serious injury collisions. MMPASO L()CAt ROAD SAFFJY PL/,PJ By Collision Type Angle (T) Hit Pedestrian Angle (Left Turn) Hit Fixed Object Hit Parked Car Overturn Hit Cyclist Rearend Angle (Right Turn) Sideswipe (Opposite Direction) Sideswipe (Same Direction) Head On Wildlife/Animal 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% FIGURE 4. MOST COMMON FATAL/SERIOUS INJURY COLLISIONS, 2014-2018 Data and graphics: WSDOT PAGE 7 L The City compared collision attributes in fatal/serious injury crashes in Pasco with statewide, citywide, and eastside city proportions. Table 1 shows an excerpt of those contributors that show up more often in Pasco at a higher proportion than comparison roadways in eastside cities (east of Cascades). TABLE 1. REPRESENTATION OF COLLISION ATTRIBUTES, 2014-2018 Data: WSDOT 1 Eastside Cities based on WSDOT averages for cities east of the Cascade Range. PAGE 8 Fatal/Serious Total Crashes Eastside Cities' Pasco Eastside Cities' Pasco By Collision Type Angle (T) 20.5% 31.9% 29.5% 27.4% Hit Pedestrian 28.1% 17.0% 2.4% 1.3% Angle (Left Turn) 9.0% 10.6% 10.1% 10.6% Hit Fixed Object 16.9% 10.6% 10.6% 8.6% Hit Parked Car 2.4% 8.5% 9.9% 8.5% Rear -end 4.2% 2.1% 23.4% 29.1% By Roadway Surface Condition Wet 10.5% 12.8% 11.3% 9.0% Ice 2.0% 2.1% 4.4% 3.3% By Light Condition Daylight 53.5% 57.4% 71.1% 72.8% Dark -Street Lights On 33.5% 25.5% 20.6% 17.6% Dark -No Street Lights 7.3% 12.8% 3.0% 3.5% By Junction Relationship Intersection Related 52.2% 53.2% 54.1% 57.5% Non -Intersection (Not Related) 40.0% 40.4% 31.7% 29.8% Driveway -Related 7.0% 6.4% 13.1% 12.5% By Roadway Curvature Horizontal Curve 6.9% 8.5% 4.0% 4.1% 1 Eastside Cities based on WSDOT averages for cities east of the Cascade Range. PAGE 8 TABLE 1. REPRESENTATION OF COLLISION ATTRIBUTES, 2014-2018 (CONTINUED) Mm PASCO LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN PAGE 9 Fatal/Serious Total Crashes Eastside Cities' Pasco Eastside Cities' Pasco Hit Fixed Object Crashes - By Fixed Object Hit Fence 10.4% 16.7% 17.4% 27.5% Curb / Raised Traffic Island 14.9% 16.7% 8.3% 9.9% Guardrail 2.6% 16.7% 1.8% 3.2% Misc. Debris on Road 0.6% 16.7% 0.9% 2.2% By Contributing Circumstance Inattention / Distraction 21.9% 23.3% 29.1% 31.1% Exceeding Safe / Stated Speed 16.0% 18.3% 6.0% 6.2% Failing to Yield 13.0% 15.0% 18.8% 16.6% Under Influence of Alcohol / Drugs 13.3% 6.7% 4.6% 3.2% Improper Turn 1.6% 5.0% 3.4% 3.8% Disregard Signal 4.4% 5.0% 3.6% 2.4% Following Too Close 1.3% 1.7% 12.9% 18.3% By Motor Vehicle Type Passenger Car 42.4% 46.3% 49.8% 54.1% Light Truck/SUV 40.4% 35.4% 46.5% 42.3% Motorcycle 13.4% 13.4% 0.9% 0.6% By Traffic Control No Traffic Control 62.9% 48.0% 58.0% 56.4% Signals 24.1% 34.7% 27.9% 29.5% Stop Sign 11.0% 17.3% 10.9% 10.6% By Roadway Type Two Way - Divided, no Barrier 23.5% 43.8% 23.3% 35.9% Two Way - Undivided 49.9% 42.7% 51.3% 42.4% Two Way - Divided, with Barrier 9.9% 9.4% 8.3% 13.8% Mm PASCO LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN PAGE 9 TABLE 1. REPRESENTATION OF COLLISION ATTRIBUTES, 2014-2018 CONTINUED a a Based on an analysis of the summary data and individual fatal/serious injury crash events, proportion of risk factors, and comparison to other eastside cities, the City selected the following five priority collision attributes to use in network analysis: 1. Angle (T) 2. Pedestrians 3. Angle (Left Turn) 4. Roadway Departure (Fixed Objects, Overturn) S. Occurring at Signalized Intersections MPAGE 10 Fatal/Serious Total Crashes Eastside Cities' Pasco Eastside Cities' Pasco Pedestrian Crashes: Contributing Circumstance Failing to Yield 30.3% 23.1% 27.7% 24.1% Failing to Yield to Ped / Cyclist 1.1% 15.4% 1.6% 10.3% Inattention / Distraction 25.8% 7.7% 28.9% 13.8% Pedestrian Crashes: Facility Used Roadway 41.8% 87.5% 29.7% 33.3% Marked Crosswalk 29.8% 12.5% 42.2% 50.0% Unmarked Crosswalk 9.2% 0.0% 12.7% 3.7% Bicycle Crashes: Contributing Circumstance Failing to Yield 27.5% 100.0% 25.1% 29.4% Inattention / Distraction 21.4% 0.0% 27.3% 52.9% Bicycle Crashes: Facility Used Roadway 52.9% 50.0% 38.8% 26.9% Sidewalk 15.3% 50.0% 21.2% 15.4% Marked Crosswalk 11.8% 0.0% 18.6% 34.6% Unmarked Crosswalk 1.2% 0.0% 6.5% 11.5% a a Based on an analysis of the summary data and individual fatal/serious injury crash events, proportion of risk factors, and comparison to other eastside cities, the City selected the following five priority collision attributes to use in network analysis: 1. Angle (T) 2. Pedestrians 3. Angle (Left Turn) 4. Roadway Departure (Fixed Objects, Overturn) S. Occurring at Signalized Intersections MPAGE 10 Alm I Following WSDOT's recommended procedure,z the City applied the most common risk factors in fatal/serious injury crashes to the entire network using frequency of collisions based on the most common risk factors / collision attributes. The City mapped crash frequency based on the seven most common risk factors in fatal and serious injury crashes. The maps in Appendix A illustrate the locations of crashes with these attributes. Table 2 and Table 3 list intersections and corridors ranked by the number of risk factors / collision attributes identified. A location received a "point" for a risk factor if it experienced a relatively high frequency of crashes with that attribute compared to the rest of the City of Pasco roadway network. An additional point was added if that location was identified as a citizen concern. TABLE 2. INTERSECTION SAFETY NEEDS, PRIORITIZED BY NUMBER OF RISK FACTORS A. N 20th Avenue & W Court Street 3 O O O O 4 B. N Road 28 & W Sylvester Street O O O O 4 C. N Road 68 & Burden Road 3 O O p 0 4 D. N Road 68 & Sandifur Parkway O O 3 E. S 10th Avenue &W Lewis Street O O O 3 F. E Lewis Street &Oregon Avenue a O I O I O 3 z WSDOT Local Road Safety Plans Guidance, httos://www.wsdot.wa.gov/sitesLdefauilt/files/2014/02/27/LP Local- Road -Safety- Plans. Ddf 3 Automated red light enforcement was installed in Fall 2019. The City will await early results before pursuing additional countermeasures. 4 Project installed along Oregon Ave in 2019 that included a redesign of this intersection. The City will review upcoming safety data before pursuing additional projects. 70K -S] PAGE 11 H. N Road 68 & W Court Street O O ; 2 I. N 24th Avenue & W Court Street O O 2 J. Burden Road & Rd 68 Place O O 2 K. N 20th Avenue & W Lewis Street O O 2 L. N 20th Avenue & W Sylvester Street ® O 2 M. N Road 36 & W Argent Road N. N Road 32 & W Court Street ® 2 TABLE 3. CORRIDOR SAFETY NEEDS, PRIORITIZED BY NUMBER OF RISK FACTORS W Court Street (Between N Road 36 & 4th Avenue) Burden Road (Between Road 68 & Road 36) N Road 68 (Between Sandifur Parkway & Argent Road) 6 6 O W Sylvester Street (Between N Road 36 & N O 10th Avenue) O 4 3 1 ry PI pri PAGE 12 F I As shown in Tables 2 and 3, the City identified 14 intersections and four corridors whose risk factors matched those exhibited by fatal and serious injury crashes in the City. Figure 5 below plots each of these locations on a map. N A �4 V Sandifur Pkwy ' J - Burden Rd........ Argentild, 40 IV— " SylXgsterst_1t L I m � Legend """"� '"-• • s� • 00 Prioritized Intersections + IRE ..--*Prioritized Corridors 0K • ASt Frequency of Crashes Value High Low 0 0.5 1 2 Mle� ' Kenne W ICV FIGURE 5. PRIORITIZED INTERSECTIONS AND CORRIDORS RM PAGE 13 410 1 The City compared the list of prioritized intersections and corridors to recent and already -funded safety projects to identify the most pressing current needs, and then analyzed collision data and existing conditions at the following eight locations: TABLE 4. PRIORITIZED SAFETY STUDY LOCATIONS 1. N Road 28 & W Sylvester St 5. W Court St (Between N Road 36 & 4th Ave) 2. N Road 68 & Sandifur Pkwy 6. Burden Rd (Between Road 68 & N Road 36) 3. S 10th Ave & W Lewis St 7. N Road 68 (Between Sandifur Pkwy & Argent Rd) 4. S 10th Ave & W Ainsworth St 8. W Sylvester St (Between N Road 36 & N 10th Ave) Upon completion of that analysis and identification of potential countermeasures, the City identified three priority projects (two intersections and one segment) to prioritize in this plan, as shown in Table 5 below. TABLE S. SAFETY PROJECTS TO PURSUE AND NEXT STEPS Traffic signal redesign and an Coordinate with current traffic additional northbound left turn lane to signal design project. Update N Road 28 & accommodate safer left turn current signal design plans to Sylvester Street movements at the intersection. accommodate these safety (between N Rd 36 & needs. Active Signal Ahead Warning sign to Apply for grant funding under the S 10th Avenue & W provide additional conspicuity for 2020 WSDOT City Safety Program. Lewis Street northbound motorists approaching the intersection. W Sylvester Street Road Diet: Reduce cross section from Apply for grant funding under the (between N Rd 36 & 4 lanes to 3 lanes to improve safety 2020 WSDOT City Safety Program. N 101h Ave) for all road users. The following sections detail existing conditions, countermeasures, and estimated project costs, monetary value of estimated safety benefits, and the estimated benefit/cost ratio of each recommended safety project. Detailed calculations for each treatment are available in Appendix B. PAGE 14 D i *f N ROAD 28 & W SYLVESTER STREET This intersection is approximately 1,000 ft east of US -395. It is a 4 -leg signalized intersection with continental crosswalks across W Sylvester Street (eastbound and westbound directions) and standard crosswalks across N 281h Avenue (northbound and southbound directions). The northbound approach along N 28th Avenue has a shared through/left-turn lane and a right -turn only lane. The southbound approach along N 28th Avenue has one shared through/left/right-turn lane. The eastbound approach along W Sylvester St has one shared/right-turn lane, one through lane and a 125' left -turn pocket. The eastbound approach also has a 5 -section dog -house signal that allows protected/permissive movements for the left -turning vehicles. The westbound approach has one shared through/right-turn lane and a 125' left -turn pocket where left -turning vehicles must yield on green. Based on vehicle counts taken between June 5, 2018 - June 7, 2018, the average daily volume travelling eastbound and westbound along Sylvester Street was reported 4,257 and 4,410, respectively. Based on vehicle counts taken between September 9, 2018 - September 27, 2018, the average daily volume travelling northbound and southbound was reported 3,668 and 4,942, respectively. Table 6 below provides a summary of crash data that occurred at this intersection. TABLE 6. CRASH DATA SUMMARY AT N ROAD 28 AND W SYLVESTER ST, 2014-2018 Total Number of at intersection 39 Crash Severity Fatal = 0 Serious Injury = 1 Minor Injury = 1 Possible Injury = 9 No Injury = 28 Crash Type Making Left Turn = 19 Entering at angle = 12 Rear -end = 4 Sideswipe = 2 Making a Right Turn = 1 Vehicle Hits Pedestrian = I Year 2014 = 5 2015=4 2016= 11 2017=11 2018=8 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 31 Raining = 3 Overcast = 3 Fog or Smog or Smoke = 2 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 28 Dark -Street Lights On = 10 Dusk =1 MMI ASC O I Ci! AI R( ^i, ��AI I I i2 l rJ Location At intersection and Related = 37 At Intersection and Not Related = 2 Roadway Conditions Dry = 35 Wet =4 Movement Type 39% were reported "Did not grant right-of-way to vehicle" 20% were reported "Disregard stop and go light" 18% were reported "Inattention" 10% were reported "Improper Turn" 2% were reported "under the influence of alcohol' 11 % Other Making Left -Turn Collisions Only Road Surface Conditions: (18 Crashes) Dry Road Surface = 16 Wet Road Surface =2 Movement: 44% involved a vehicle moving from the east leg to the south leg (WB LT) 44% involved a vehicle moving from the south to the west leg (NB LT) Lighting Conditions: Daylight =12 Dark- Street Lights On = 6 Nearly half (19 of 39) of collisions during the study period involved a left -turning motorist. Of those 19, nine involved South -to -West (Northbound Left Turn) drivers, and eight involved East -to -South (Westbound Left Turn) movements. Signalized intersection existing conditions—with a focus on left -turn movements—include the following shown in Table 6:5 TABLE 7. ROAD 28 AND W SYLVESTER STREET INTERSECTION COMPONENTS Northbound 8" green, 8" yellow, Permissive Only 12 red Southbound 12" all 12" all (5 -section Eastbound doghouse) 8" green and 8" yellow (through) Westbound 8" green, 8" yellow, 12" red 5 Via Google Streetview, Oct 2018. ® PA` U tm-Al ROAD SAF FiY PI Permissive Only Protected - Permissive Permissive Only Green Ball Green Ball Green Ball Green Arrow (5 -section doghouse) Green Ball Shared Thru/Left Right Turn Lane Shared Rig ht/Thru/Left Shared Thru/Right Thru Left Turn Lane Shared Right/Thru Left Turn Lane PAGE 16 N Rd 28 & W Sylvester St: Intersection Countermeasures The existing lane configuration of the northbound approach has two receiving lanes, but only one entering lane from each other approach (SB thru, EB right, WB left). There is a potential benefit of the City of Pasco restriping the inside receiving lane to a northbound left -turn lane with no additional right-of-way pavement needed, as shown in Figure 6 below. FIGURE 6. POTENTIAL REDESIGN FOR THE NORTHBOUND APPROACH ALONG N 28TH AVENUE AT W SYLVESTER ST TO ALLOW FOR A LEFT TURN LANE. MM PAGE 17 N Rd 28 & W Sylvester St Countermeasure: Left Turn Lane and Flashing Yellow Arrow Proiect Description Cost Estimate G Crash Reduction 7 Installing an exclusive Crash ReductionE $25,000 (includes—:L'♦ COQ 35 left -turn lane and 10% updated signal /d using Flashing Yellow head, pavement Arrow for the Reduction in marking, signing) Combined reduction in left northbound 6 intersection Benefit /Cost turn collisions for left -turn lane intersection crashes. Ratio and flashing yellow arrow. approach can History: 39 crashes potential mast arm and/or pole History: 9 northbound left turn reduce rear -end and observed from 2014 - 25.80 crashes observed from 2014 - left -turning crashes. ( l) �.� Time Frame Medium-term 2018. Expected Benefit: 1.10 fewer Long-term Expected Benefit: 0.77 12" lenses. crashes per year For a more comprehensive upgrade to the intersection, a full re -build of the traffic signal, upgrades to signal heads, and permissive -protected left turns for northbound, eastbound, and westbound motorists is expected to reduce the overall number and severity of collisions. N Rd 28 & W Sylvester St Countermeasure: Signal Upgrades e Proiect Description Traffic signals are designed to Cost Estimate $400,000 Crash ReductionE 10% i reduce angle and left -turn crashes by assigning (ght-a- way for each intersection Benefit / Cost Reduction in Ratio intersection movement. crashes. Includes head -per -lane, 3.60 History: 39 crashes potential mast arm and/or pole observed from 2014 - replacement, retroreflective Time Frame 2018• backplates, and upgrade to Long-term Expected Benefit: 0.77 12" lenses. fewer crashes per year Next Steps Coordinate with current signal design project at this location to consider accommodation for these safety needs (e.g., protected left turn phasing, northbound dedicated left turn lane). 6 Identified as "From South to West' in the collision database. 7 httt)://www.cmfclearinghouse.oro/detaiI.cfm?facid=264 8 htto://www.cmfciearinohouse.ora/detai1.cfm?facid=4112 I® LOCAL ROAD SMETY&N PAGE 18 1 A.*-# S 10TH AVENUE & W LEWIS STREET S 10th Avenue provides access between Kennewick and Pasco across the Ed Hendler Bridge (SR 397). This four -legged signalized intersection has continental pedestrian crosswalks on all approaches and has a pedestrian island on the south-east corner. The northbound approach along S 10th Avenue has two through lanes, a right -turn slip lane and a 110' left -turn lane with a raised curb median. The southbound approach along S 10th Avenue has a shared through/right-turn lane, a through lane and an 85' left -turn lane. The eastbound approach along W Lewis St has a shared through/right-turn lane, through lane and a 160' left turn lane that transitions from a two -way -left - turn lane. The westbound approach has a shared through/right-turn lane, a through lane and an 80' left -turn lane. Based on vehicle counts taken between June 5, 2018 - June 7, 2018, the average daily volume travelling eastbound and westbound along Lewis Street was reported 5,305 and 5,582, respectively. Based on vehicle counts taken between September 25, 2018 - September 27, 2018, the average daily volume travelling northbound and southbound along S 10th Avenue was reported 3,888 and 3,045, respectively. Table 8 below provides a summary of crash data that occurred at this intersection. TABLE 8. CRASH DATA SUMMARY FOR S 10TH AVENUE & W LEWIS STREET Total Number of Crashes 26 Crash Severity Fatal = 0 Serious Injury = 1 Minor Injury = 0 Possible Injury = 5 No Injury = 20 Crash Type Entering at angle = 11 Rear -end = 6 Making Left Turn = 5 Sideswipe = 2 Vehicle Hits Pedestrian = 1 Making Right Turn =1 Year 2014 = 4 2015=8 2016=7 2017=5 2018=2 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 22 Overcast = 3 Raining = 1 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 21 Dark -Street Lights On = 5 .„ D KS PAGE 19 An* r M1- 1 Category Number of Crashes Location At intersection and Related = 22 Not at Intersection and Not Related = 1 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection = 2 At Intersection and Not Related = 1 Roadway Conditions Dry = 24 Wet= 1 Movement Type 27% were reported "Inattention" 19% were reported "Did not grant right-of-way to vehicle" 19% were reported "Disregard stop and go light" 35% Other Making Left -Turn Collisions Only Conditions: 3 or 11 crashes occurred during "Dark -Street Lights on" 5 of 11 crashes involved a vehicle moving from the south leg to the north leg (Northbound through along S 10th Ave) 4 of 11 crashes reported a vehicle "Disregard stop and go light" 4 of 11 crashes reported "inattention" Based on the historical crash data, there was one suspected serious injury crash that occurred at 10pm and involved a pickup/panel truck travelling northbound along S 10th Ave. The motorist was reported 'had been drinking' and hit a pedestrian crossing at the marked crosswalk against the signal'. Approximately 290' south of this study intersection is a railroad crossing with a mild curvature along S 10th Avenue at W Columbia St, as shown in Figure 7. It may be beneficial if the City of Pasco were to consider installing a northbound advance signal ahead warning sign that would alert drivers to stop for an approaching red light. 5 loth Ave & W Lewis St: Intersection Countermeasure Seven of the 11 angle crashes at this intersection involved northbound motorists, and a review of the site indicated that another intersection (West Columbia Street), curvature near that intersection, and a railroad track could cause some confusion for northbound motorists. An advanced warning sign indicating the signal ahead could provide additional information for drivers. Connecting a flashing beacon to the signal timing (i.e., flashing only during yellow and red phases for northbound traffic) could increase its effectiveness. PAGE 20 FIGURE 7. STREETVIEW OF NORTHBOUND APPROACH ALONG S 10TH AVE AT W COLUMBIA ST (SOUTH OF RAILROAD CROSSING). 5 10th Ave & W Lewis St Countermeasure: Actuated Advanced Warning Sign Project Description Cost Estimate Crash Reduction Ek Adding advance $45,000 6 2% warning of the signalized Benefit / Cost Ratio Reduction in NB angle intersection for northbound 13.43 crashes. motorists on S 10th History: 7 angle crashes Ave, approaching Time Frame involving northbound motorists W Lewis St, and Medium-term observed from 2014-2018. tying that warning Expected Benefit: 0.87 fewer to the signal angle crashes per year. controller, reduces the risk of angle crashes PAGE 21 10Th W SYLVESTER STREET (BETWEEN N ROAD 36 & N AVENUE This study corridor along W Sylvester Street spans 1.7 miles between N Road 36 and N 10th Avenue. Along the W Sylvester Street corridor there are four signalized intersections (N 10th Avenue, N 14th Avenue, N 20th Avenue and N 28th Avenue) and two pedestrian crosswalks (N 18th Avenue and N 24th Avenue). There are sidewalks on both sides of W Sylvester Street from N 10th Avenue to Road 28. The posted speed limit along this corridor is 35mph, however in a school zone such as the Rowena Chess Elementary School, the posted speed limit is 20mph. Based on the WSDOT Functional Classification Map9, W Sylvester Street is identified as an urban minor arterial and serves as one of the important east -west corridors. TABLE 9. CRASH DATA SUMMARY FOR SYLVESTER ST CORRIDOR, ROAD 36 TO 10TH AVE,2014-2018 Total Number of Crashes 208 Crash Severity Fatal = 1 Serious Injury = 3 Minor Injury = 14 Possible Injury = 42 No Injury = 144 Unknown = 4 Crash Type Entering at angle = 73 Rear -end = 49 Making Left Turn = 37 Sideswipe = 9 Other = 22 Fixed object = 12 Vehicle Hits Pedestrian = 6 Year 2014 = 27 2015 = 44 2016 =43 2017 = 48 2018 =46 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 167 Raining = 11 Overcast = 21 Fog or Smog or Smoke = 6 Snowing =1 Severe Crosswind =2 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 150 Dark -Street Lights On = 46 Dusk/Dawn = 3 Dark- No street Lights = 1 9 https://www. wsdot.wa.gov/data/tools/geoi)ortal/?config=Functiona!Class MPAGE 22 400 1 M -- - Category Number of Crashes Location At intersection and Related = 144 Not at Intersection and Not Related = 28 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection = 7 At Intersection and Not Related = 7 At Driveway = 22 Roadway Conditions Dry = 182 Wet =20 Ice = 6 Movement Type 25% were reported "Inattention" 21%were reported "Did not grant right-of-way to vehicle" 11%were reported "Following too closely" 2% were reported "Under the influence of alcohol" Entering at Angle Collisions Only Road Surface Conditions: Dry Road Surface =46 Ice Road Surface = 1 Wet Road Surface =2 Lighting Conditions: Daylight = 40 Dark- Street Lights On = 5 Dusk =4 I O( Al k0A[J S,Af t l Y PAGE 23 W Sylvester St: Corridor Countermeasure The existing roadway consists of four 11 -ft travel lanes, two per direction, through the study corridor. Due to the large right-of-way width along this study corridor, a potential project to be considered is a road diet, as illustrated in Figure 8. A Road Diet is generally described as "removing travel lanes from a roadway and utilizing the space for other uses and travel modes." io Be, - After FIGURE 8. BEFORE AND AFTER LANE CONFIGURATIONS OF A ROAD DIET IMPLEMENTATION Road Diets are effective at addressing rear -end, left -turn, angle, and sideswipe (lane -changing) collisions. Along W Sylvester St in the study segment, more than 58% (152 of 262) of collisions were of these types. Road Diets can also provide safer conditions for pedestrians by reducing the number of lanes required to cross from 4 to 3. An example of a road diet is shown in Figure 9. FIGURE 9. RESIDENTIAL AREA ROAD DIET IMPLEMENTATION io FHWA Road Diet Informational Guide. dig tslduidance rPAGE 24 P;, iii? an*W Sylvester St Countermeasure: Road Diet Proiect Description A Road Diet typically includes reducing the number of general purpose travel lanes to improve safety for all road users. Cost Estimate ' i $1,853,000 (assuming pavement overlay and minor signal modifications) �-¢--� Benefit /Cost Ratio /,�' 1` 10.71 Time Frame Long-term QCrash Reduction 297 Reduction in all crashes. History: 208 crashes observed from 2014-2018 (41.6 crashes per year) Expected Benefit: 12 fewer crashes per year 11 FHWA, How Much Does a Road Diet Cost? I Oregon DOT safety treatment cost estimates. PAS(_O 1 OCA[ ROAD SA(LiY Pi t -N PAGE 25 0 4*# Alm W SYLVESTER STREET EXTENDED CORRIDOR (BETWEEN N ROAD 54 & N 3RD AVENUE) Based on stakeholder discussions, the study corridor analysis along W Sylvester Street was extended to 3.4 -miles to include the whole section of W Sylvester Street with four travel lanes. This extended study corridor from Road 54 to N 3`d Avenue includes two additional signalized intersections at N 5th Avenue and N 4th Avenue. Table 10 below provides a summary of crash data for the 3.4 -mile study corridor along W Sylvester Street. TABLE 10. CRASH DATA SUMMARY FOR SYLVESTER ST CORRIDOR, ROAD 54 TO N 3RD AVE, 2014-2018 Total Number of Crashes 270 Crash Severity Fatal = 1 Serious Injury = 3 Minor Injury = 15 Possible Injury = 63 No Injury = 182 Unknown = 6 Crash Type Entering at angle = 100 Rear -end = 53 Making Left Turn = 51 Sideswipe = 10 Other = 31 Fixed object = 18 Vehicle Hits Pedestrian = 7 Year 2014 = 33 2015 = 60 2016 =54 2017 = 58 2018 =65 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 224 Raining = 13 Overcast = 23 Fog or Smog or Smoke = 7 Snowing = 1 Severe Crosswind = 2 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 197 Dark -Street Lights On = 56 Dusk =1 1 Dawn = 4 j Dark -No Street Lights = 2 Location At intersection and Related = 195 Not at Intersection and Not Related = 33 At Driveway = 22 At Intersection and Not Related = 13 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection = 7 Roadway Conditions Dry = 242 Wet =21 MRIAS( G l ()CAL SAFE i v Pt I" f. WAGE 26 Ice =6 Snow = 1 Movement Type 23% were reported "Inattention" 21 % were reported "Did not grant right-of-way to vehicle" 7% were reported "Following too closely" 3% were reported "Under the influence of alcohol" Road Surface Conditions: Entering at Angle Collisions Dry Road Surface = 88 Only (100 crashes) Ice Road Surface = 1 Wet Road Surface = 11 Lighting Conditions: Daylight = 74 Dark- Street Lights On = 19 Dawn = 2 Dusk =5 W Sylvester St Extended Corridor Countermeasure: Road Diet Proiect Description A Road Diet typically Includes reducing the number of general purpose travel lanes to improve safety for all road users. (� Cost Estimate '? $3,645,000 (assuming pavement overlay required and minor signal modifications) P Benefit / Cost Ratio 6.27 Time Frame l Long-term n Crash Reduction 297o Reduction in all crashes. History: 270 crashes observed from 2014-2018 (54 crashes per year) Expected Benefit: 15.6 fewer crashes per year 12 FHWA, How Much Does a Road Diet Cost? haps•//safety.fhwa.dot.aov/road diets/resources/fhwasa16100/fhwasa16100.odf MR PASCO LOCAI ROAD SAFETY PLAN L� 1 The City of Pasco is committed to roadway safety, and the Local Road Safety Plan provides the framework to identify safety needs and infrastructure solutions. Implementation of these safety projects will reduce the number and severity of roadway collisions in the City, and further evaluation and analysis over time will support a safety management program to continue improving safety in Pasco. MEPASCO LOCAL ROAD SAFETY Pt AN PAGE 28 I I® PASCO LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN N . a4 *so. Legend Angle T Crashes Frequency of Crashes � High Low 's Cb 0 b" 2 !V!66i'" FIGURE 10. HEAT MAP OF ANGLE T CRASHES, 2014-2018 N A � PAGE 30 • • • - • �pcn•I N� ��• We W,Nn, i 6Wn4 OollCowa� • r • � �ry v:amc� P . i s = • z FasLo • • , • kj 0 op :��'------- -- � P esu •�•!� �y •! ��;. Legend Frequency of Crashes High I...,. A, - o� - Low KenneWKR 0 8.5 1 2 Mile§ g ioh a" FIGURE 11. HEAT MAP OF ROADWAY DEPARTURE CRASHES, 2014.2018 PAGE 31 FIGURE 12. HEAT MAP OF CRASHES NEAR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION (74FT BUFFER), 2014-2018 PAGE 32 W. RC .AaA A. A u F Tl - Z � ,. �.... •• • 1 b.WiW tin�c= ♦ z �♦ z :r.t Iib., �a -4tl _:.� crr""w. A ;Mr4i.♦%♦ Ai..s :d�1 wfw. nt S! S Y j 4 '10 .,,y 4 wrkM �: YYll �''P Y nsfo Legend w. Frequency of Crashes t High y Lowo:i<. ., 1 Rennowirk e..., 0 D.6 1 FIGURE 12. HEAT MAP OF CRASHES NEAR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION (74FT BUFFER), 2014-2018 PAGE 32 N s • 4 3 0 a vh ti` >_ Paaco , Legend _ (/ Frequency of Crashes High Low KennexkK n Soames Ean. HERE. G—in IMennep Inp—n(P Corp, GEBCO, US( ;§ rAo-,PS. NRCAN G.Bese, IGN, Kae2ater NL, Ordnance S=y Een Jepan, METLEan China (Horg Kong}, avnsemno. s9 0 0.5 i 2 Miles Y i OpenS>ro N%p—mbutom, and me GIS User --4 _ FIGURE 13. HEAT MAP OF PEDESTRIAN CRASHES, 2014.2018 �I �. Sara i'v�v f c �G�il+:x il.a 'U Bu•�ar ..C1r Y 0nIY11a\ OeMGW 0M.r1 \ cb- z s F sato - �� %ip. Legend �.. Frequency of Crashes High Wrv,.,,,AI .�,.,. lYaa y,. Cha - LOW Oe1 Ck! ti Kennew'6 a..,.•- er ww E 0 'B.5 1 € 2 Mle�" FIGURE 14. HEAT MAP OF LEFT TURN CRASHES, 2014-2018 PAGE 34 1 PAGE 35 WSDOT Safety Program Benefit/Cost Worksheet For Crash Reduction Project name: N Rd 28 and W Sylvester St, Northbound Left Turn Lane Application year: Agency: City of Pasco Improvement: Install a northbound left turn lane Evaluator: Brian Chandler and Veronica Sullivan Date: 2/19/2020 lb. Year 11 Cost, 1a. Initial Total Project Cost, I: $25,000 J: $0 2. Annual Op. Costs, H: $0 3. Annual Safety Benefits in Number of Collisions: Existing Raw Existing After Crash Type # Calculated After Raw # Calculated Difference a) Fatal injury 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 b) Suspected serious injury 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 c) Suspected minor injury 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 d) Possible Injury 2 0.40 0.7774 0.16 0.24 e) Property damage only 7 1.40 2.7209 0.54 0.86 Totals 9.00 5.382 1.10 4. Societal Costs Per Crash: 5. Annual Safety Benefits by Costs of Crashes: Crash Type Cost Benefit a) Fatality (K) $3,423,400 $0 b) Suspected serious injury (A) $3,423,400 $0 c) Suspected minor injury (B) $237,400 $0 d) Possible Injury (D $142,300 $34,795 e) Property damage only (0) $14,800 $12,666 Yearly Benefits= $47,461 7. Salvage Value, T Feature Cost Factor a) Right of Way (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.45 = $0 b) Grading & Drainage (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.40 = $0 c) Structures (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.43 = $0 d) Total, T: $0 8. Present Worth of Costs (PWOC) = I + .68J + 13.59H - T: $25,000 9. Present Worth of Benefits (PWOB) = 13.59 x Yearly Benefits: $645,000 30. Net Benefit = PWOB-PWOC: $620,000 11. Benefit Cost Ratio, B/C = PWOB/PWOC: 25.80 PAGE 36 WSDOT Safety Program Benefit/Cost Worksheet For Crash Reduction Project name: N Rd 28 and W Sylvester St, Signal Upgrade Application year: Agency: City of Pasco PAGE 37 Upgrade signalized intersection with signal lens upgrade, new back plates, addition of Improvement: reflective tapes to existing back -plates and installation of additional signal heads. Evaluator: Brian Chandler and Veronica Sullivan Date: 2/19/2020 lb. Year 11 Cost, 1a. Initial Total Project Cost, I: $400,000 J: $0 2. Annual Op. Costs, H: $0 3. Annual Safety Benefits in Number of Collisions: Existing Raw Existing After Crash Type # Calculated After Raw # Calculated Difference a) Fatal injury 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 b) Suspected serious injury 1 0.20 0.901 0.18 0.02 c) Suspected minor injury 1 0.20 0.901 0.18 0.02 d) Possible Injury 9 1.80 8.109 1.62 0.18 e) Property damage only 28 5.60 25.228 5.05 T0.55 Totals 39.00 35.139 0.77 4. Societal Costs Per Crash: 5. Annual Safety Benefits by Costs of Crashes: Crash Type Cost Benefit a) Fatality (K) $3,423,400 $0 b) Suspected serious injury (A) $3,423,400 $67,783 c) Suspected minor injury (B) $237,400 $4,701 d) Possible Injury © $142,300 $25,358 e) Property damage only (0) $14,800 $8,205 Yearly Benefits= $106,047 7. Salvage Value, T Feature Cost Factor a) Right of Way (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.45 = $0 b) Grading & Drainage (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.40 = $0 c) Structures (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.43 = $0 d) Total, T: $0 8. Present Worth of Costs (PWOC) = I + .68J + 13.59H - T: $400,000 9. Present Worth of Benefits (PWOB) = 13.59 x Yearly Benefits: $1,441,176 10. Net Benefit = PWOB-PWOC: $1,041,176 11. Benefit Cost Ratio, B/C = PWOB/PWOC: 3.60 PAGE 37 WSDOT Safety Program Benefit/Cost Worksheet For Crash Reduction Project name: N 10th Avenue & W Lewis St, Adding advance warning signs Application year: Agency: City of Pasco Improvement: Install a northbound advance signal warning sign Evaluator: Brian Chandler and Veronica Sullivan Date: PAGE 38 1b. Year 11 Cost, la. Initial Total Project Cost, I: $45,000 J: $0 2. Annual Op. Costs, H: $0 3. Annual Safety Benefits in Number of Collisions: Existing Raw Existing After Crash Type # Calculated After Raw # Calculated Difference a) Fatal injury 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 b) Suspected serious injury 0 0.20 0 0.00 0.00 c) Suspected minor injury 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 d) Possible Injury 2 1.00 0.76 0.15 0.25 e) Property damage only 5 4.00 1.9 0.38 0.62 Totals 26.00 2.66 0.87 4: Societal Costs Per Crash: S. Annual Safety Benefits by Costs of Crashes: Crash Type Cost Benefit a) Fatality (K) $3,423,400 $0 b) Suspected serious injury (A) $3,423,400 $0 c) Suspected minor injury (B) $237,400 $0 d) Possible Injury © $142,300 $35,290 e) Property damage only (0) $14,800 $9,176 Yearly Benefits= $44,466 7. Salvage Value, T Feature Cost Factor a) Right of Way (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.45 = $0 b) Grading & Drainage (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.40 = $0 c) Structures (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.43 = $0 d) Total, T: $0 8. Present Worth of Costs (PWOC) = I +.68J + 13.59H - T: $45,000 9. Present Worth of Benefits (PWOB) =13.59 x Yearly Benefits: $604,298 10. Net Benefit = PWOB-PWOC: $559,298 11. Benefit Cost Ratio, B/C = PWOB/PWOC: 13.43 PAGE 38 WSDOT Safety Program Benefit/Cost Worksheet For Crash Reduction Project name: N Rd 28 and W Sylvester St, Road Diet from Rd 36 to N 10th Avenue Application year: Agency: City of Pasco Improvement: Convert 1.7 miles along Sylvester St from 4 lanes to 3 travel lanes. Evaluator: Brian Chandler and Veronica Sullivan Date: lb. Year 11 la. Initial Total Project Cost, I: $1,853,000.00 Cost, J: $0 2. Annual Op. Costs, H: $0 3. Annual Safety Benefits in Number of Collisions: Crash Type a) Fatal injury b) Suspected serious injury c) Suspected minor injury d) Possible Injury e) Property damage only 4. Societal Costs Per Crash: Crash Type a) Fatality (K) b) Suspected serious injury (A) c) Suspected minor injury (B) d) Possible Injury e) Property damage only (0) Existing Raw # 1 3 14 42 148 Totals 208.00 Cost Existing Calculated After Raw # After Calculated Difference 0.20 0.71 0.14 0.06 0.60 2.13 0.43 0.17 2.80 9.94 1.99 0.81 8.40 29.82 5.96 2.44 29.60 105.08 21.02 8.58 147.68 S. Annual Safety Benefits by Crashes: 12.06 Costs of Benefit $198,557 $595,672 $192,769 $346,643 $127,043 Yearly Benefits= $1,460,684 7. Salvage Value, T Feature Cost Factor a) Right of Way (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.45 = $0 b) Grading & Drainage (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.40 = $0 c) Structures (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.43 = $0 d) Total, T: $0 8. Present Worth of Costs (PWOC) = I + .68J + 13.59H - T: $1,853,000 $19,850,69 9. Present Worth of Benefits (PWOB) =13.59 x Yearly Benefits: 0 $17,997,69 30. Net Benefit = PWOB-PWOC: 0 11. Benefit Cost Ratio, B/C = PWOB/PWOC: 10.71 PAGE 39 Project name: Application year: Agency: Improvement: Evaluator: WSDOT Safety Program Benefit/Cost Worksheet For Crash Reduction N Rd 28 and W Svlvester St. Road Diet from Rd 54 to N 3rd Avenue. City of Pasco Convert 3.4 miles along Sylvester St from 4 lanes to 3 travel lanes. Brian Chandler and Veronica Sullivan Date: 2/25/2020 PAGE 40 lb. Year 11 Cost, la. Initial Total Project Cost, I: $3,645,000.00 J: $0 2. Annual Op. Costs, H: $0 3. Annual Safety Benefits in Number of Collisions: Existing After Differenc Crash Type Existing Raw # Calculated After Raw # Calculated e a) Fatal injury 1 0.20 0.71 0.14 0.06 b) Suspected serious injury 3 0.60 2.13 0.43 0.17 c) Suspected minor injury 15 3.00 10.65 2.13 0.87 d) Possible Injury 63 12.60 44.73 8.95 3.65 e) Property damage only 188 37.60 133.48 26.70 10.90 Totals 270.00 191.7 15.66 4. Societal Costs Per Crash: S. Annual Safety Benefits by Costs of Crashes: Crash Type Cost Benefit a) Fatality (K) $3,423,400 $198,557 b) Suspected serious injury (A) $3,423,400 $595,672 c) Suspected minor injury (B) $237,400 $206,538 d) Possible Injury © $142,300 $519,964 e) Property damage only (0) $14,800 $161,379 Yearly Benefits= $1,682,110 7. Salvage Value, T Feature Cost Factor a) Right of Way (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.45 = $0 b) Grading & Drainage (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.40 = $0 c) Structures (from cost estimate) $0 x 0.43 = $0 d) Total, T: $0 8. Present Worth of Costs (PWOC) = I + .68J + 13.59H - T: $3,645,000 9. Present Worth of Benefits (PWOB) = 13.59 x Yearly Benefits: $22,859,878 10. Net Benefit= PWOB-PWOC: $19,214,878 11. Benefit Cost Ratio, B/C = PWOB/PWOC: 6.27 PAGE 40 ANAIS 1 N ROAD 68 & SANDIFUR PARKWAY COLLISIONS, 2014-2018 Total Number of Crashes 41 Crash Severity Fatal = 0 Serious Injury = 0 Minor Injury = 2 Possible Injury =13 No Injury = 26 Crash Type Making Left turn =15 Rear -end = 15 Sideswipe = 3 Entering at angle = 6 Fixed Object = 2 Year 2014 = 7 2015=6 2016= 12 2017=8 2018=8 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 35 Overcast =3 Fog or Smog or Smoke = 1 Raining = 1 Snowing = 1 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 27 Dark -Street Lights On = 13 Dusk =1 Location At intersection and Related = 33 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection = 4 At Intersection and Not Related = 4 Roadway Conditions Dry = 36 Wet or ice= 5 Movement Type 29% were reported "Inattention" 24% were reported "Did not Grant Right of Way to vehicle" 12% were reported "Following too closely" Making Left -Turn Collisions Only Light Condition: (15 crashes) 47% of left -turn crashes occurred during "dark -street lights on" (compared to 32% of all crashes occurring during dark conditions) PAGE 41 S 10TH AVENUE & AINSWORTH COLLISIONS, 2014-2018 Total Number of Crashes 26 Crash Severity Fatal = 0 Serious Injury = 0 Minor Injury = 0 Possible Injury = 9 No Injury = 17 Crash Type Making Left Turn = 9 Rear -end = 7 Sideswipe = 5 Making Right Turn = 2 Entering at Angle = 2 Heat On = 1 Year 2014 = 4 2015=4 2016=3 2017=9 2018=6 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 22 Overcast = 2 Raining = 1 Snowing = 1 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 21 Dark -Street Lights On = 4 Dusk = 1 Location At intersection and Related = 24 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection = 2 Roadway Conditions Dry = 24 Wet =2 Movement Type 27% were reported "Inattention" 23% were reported "Improper Turn" 15% were reported "Did not Grant Right of Way" 35% Other Making Leff Turn Collisions Only Conditions: (9 crashes) 2 of 9 crashes occurred during "Dark -Street Lights on" 7 of 9 crashes involved a vehicle moving from the east leg travelling westbound along Ainsworth) 3 of 9 crashes reported a vehicle "Did not Grant Right of Way to Vehicle" 3 of 9 crashes reported "inattention" PAGE 42 0 W COURT STREET (BETWEEN N RD 36 & 4TH AVE) COLLISIONS, 2014-2018 Total Number of Crashes along 416 Sylvester St Raining = 29 Crash Severity Fatal = 0 Serious Injury = 1 Minor Injury = 20 Possible Injury = 87 Lighting Conditions No Injury = 305 Unknown = 3 Crash Type Rear -end = 151 Entering at angle = 136 Making Left Turn = 49 Sideswipe = 29 Location Other = 29 Fixed object = 13 Vehicle Hits Pedestrian = 8 Vehicle Hits Pedacyclist = 1 Year 2014 = 61 2015 = 78 2016 = 90 2017 = 95 2018 = 92 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 333 Raining = 29 Overcast = 47 Fog or Smog or Smoke = 2 Snowing = 3 Severe Crosswind/Blowing Sand or Snow = 2 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 322 Dark -Street Lights On = 72 Dark -No Street Lights = 3 Dark -Street Lights Off = 2 Dawn = 2 Dusk= 14 Location At intersection and Related = 233 Not at Intersection and Not Related = 53 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection = 27 At Intersection and Not Related = 19 At Driveway with Major Intersection = 12 At Driveway = 65 Roadway Conditions Dry = 347 Wet =52 Ice = 7 Snow = 9 Movement Type 25% were reported "Inattention" 19% were reported "Did not grant right-of-way to vehicle" 19% were reported "Following Too Closely" 2% were reported "under the influence of alcohol" PAGE 43 1 I_ Entering of Angle Collisions Only Ice Road Surface = 3 Wet Road Surface =17 Lighting Conditions: Daylight = 111 Dark- Street Lights On = 20 Dark- No Street Lights =1 Dusk = 3 PAGE 44 am' BURDEN ROAD (BETWEEN RD 68 & RD 36) COLLISIONS, 2014-2018 Total Number of Crashes along 304 Court St Crash Severity Fatal = 0 Serious Injury = 4 Minor Injury = 6 Possible Injury = 65 No Injury = 229 Crash Type Rear -end = 151 Entering at angle = 47 Making Left Turn = 45 Sideswipe = 27 Other= 32 Vehicle Hits Pedal cyclist = 1 Vehicle Hits Pedestrian = 1 Year 2014 = 44 2015 = 65 2016 =56 2017=65 2018 =74 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 249 Raining = 21 Overcast = 24 Fog or Smog or Smoke = 2 Snowing = 2 Other = 6 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 219 Dark -Street Lights On = 72 Dusk = 11 Dawn = 2 _ Location At intersection and Related = 158 Not at Intersection and Not Related = 50 At Intersection and Not Related = 36 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection = 32 At Driveway = 15 Driveway Related = 13 Roadway Conditions Dry = 253 Wet =31 Ice = 14 Snow = 6 Movement Type 32% were reported "Inattention" 22% were reported "following too closely" 12% were reported "Did not grant right-of-way to vehicle" 8% were reported "Improper Turn" 2% were reported "under the influence of alcohol' 24% Other Road Surface Conditions: PAGE 45 Rear -end Collisions Only Dry Road Surface = 128 Wet Road Surface =15 Ice Road Surface = 5 Snow/Slush = 3 Lighting Conditions: Daylight = 112 Dark- Street Lights On = 32 Dawn =1 Dusk =6 Location: 40% were reported "At intersection and related" 18% were reported "At intersection and not related" 19% were reported "Intersection related but not at intersection" 20% were reported "Not at intersection and not related" 3% Other Other Conditions: 44% involved a pickup, panel truck or semi -trailer 58% involved a vehicle travelling from the east leg to the west leg (Westbound through) ROAD 68 (BETWEEN SANDIFUR PKWY & ARGENT RD) COLLISIONS, 2014-2018 Total Number of Crashes along 483 Court St Crash Severity Fatal = 0 Serious Injury = 3 Minor Injury = 14 Possible Injury = 104 No Injury = 360 Unknown = 2 Crash Type Rear -end = 270 Entering at angle = 73 Making Left Turn = 47 Sideswipe = 64 Other = 19 Fixed object = 10 Year 2014 = 89 2015 = 105 2016 =100 2017 = 89 2018 =100 Weather Clear or Partly Cloudy = 414 Overcast = 39 Raining = 21 PAGE 46 410 1 Category Number of Crashes 26% were reported "Following too closely" 12% were reported "Did not grant right-of-way to vehicle" 5% were reported "Disregard stop and go light" 2% were reported "Under the influence of alcohol' Road Surface Conditions: Rear -end Collisions Only (270 Dry Road Surface = 248 crashes) Wet Road Surface =17 Snow / Slush = 5 Lighting Conditions: Daylight = 208 Dark- Street Lights On = 43 Dawn =1 Dusk = 16 Dark - No Street Lights = 2 Location: 57% were reported "At intersection and related" 19% were reported "Not at intersection and not related" 14% were reported "Intersection related but not at intersection" 8% were reported "At intersection and not related" 2% Other PAGE 47 Fog or Smog or Smoke = 3 Snowing = 2 Other = 3 Lighting Conditions Daylight = 191 Dark -Street Lights On = 54 Dawn = 4 Dusk =11 Location At intersection and Related = 186 Not at Intersection and Not Related = 33 Intersection Related but Not at Intersection = 6 At Intersection and Not Related = 15 At Driveway = 16 Roadway Conditions Dry = 238 Wet = 17 Ice = 5 Snow = 2 Movement Type 29% were reported "Inattention" 26% were reported "Following too closely" 12% were reported "Did not grant right-of-way to vehicle" 5% were reported "Disregard stop and go light" 2% were reported "Under the influence of alcohol' Road Surface Conditions: Rear -end Collisions Only (270 Dry Road Surface = 248 crashes) Wet Road Surface =17 Snow / Slush = 5 Lighting Conditions: Daylight = 208 Dark- Street Lights On = 43 Dawn =1 Dusk = 16 Dark - No Street Lights = 2 Location: 57% were reported "At intersection and related" 19% were reported "Not at intersection and not related" 14% were reported "Intersection related but not at intersection" 8% were reported "At intersection and not related" 2% Other PAGE 47