Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022.03.21 Council Meeting Packet AGENDA City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, March 21, 2022 City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar Page 1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - Governor Inslee's Heathy Washington - Roadmap to Recovery, Phase 3 made in response to the COVID-19 emergency, currently allows for partial "in-person" meetings. Members of the public wishing to attend City Council meetings in-person will need to follow the Governor's protocol outlined in Proclamation No. 20-28.15. Individuals, who would like to provide public comment remotely, may continue to do so by filling out the online form via the City’s website (www.pasco- wa.gov/publiccomment) to obtain access information to comment. Requests to comment in meetings must be received by 4:00 p.m. on the day of each meeting. To listen to the meeting via phone, call (631) 992-3211 and use access code 613-585-088. City Council meetings are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco- wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL (a) Pledge of Allegiance 4. CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Council members or the public, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately. 5 - 15 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 354 To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and Regular Workshop held on March 7, 2022 and March 14, 2022. 16 - 24 (b) Ordinance Amending Pasco Municipal Code - Title 3 Related to Miscellaneous Late Fees To adopt Ordinance No. 4583, amending Pasco Municipal Code, chapter 3.70 the “Miscellaneous Billing Management,” and section 3.35.100 “Miscellaneous", related to late fees, and further, authorize publication by summary only. 25 - 34 (c) Resolution - Bid Award Riverview East Sewer Lift Station To approve Resolution No. 4163, awarding Bid No. 19053 for the Riverview East Sewer Lift Station (aka Road 52 & Pearl Street Lift Station) project to Big D's construction of Tri-Cities, Inc. of Pasco, Washington, and further authorize the City Manager to e xecute the contract documents and allowing all necessary budget adjustments. 35 - 63 (d) Resolution - Emergency Agreement for Animal Control Services To approve Resolution No. 4164, approving the Emergency Services Agreement with Benton Franklin Humane Society for Animal Control and Sheltering Services, and further authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. 64 - 69 (e) Tourism Promotion Area Reserve Fund Request To approve the 2022 Special Project Expenditures for the Tourism Promotion Area in the amount of $428,800 to be funded from the TPA Reserve Balance. (RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 6. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS - This item is provided to allow citizens the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best directed to staff members who have acces s to specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. 7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS Page 2 of 354 (a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers 8. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO 70 - 75 (a) Appeal of Garcia Latecomer for Watermain Installation 9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS 76 - 87 (a) Ordinance - Olberding & Farm 2005 LLC (ANX 2021-003) MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. 4574A, which repeals and amends Ordinance No. 4574, annexing certain real property to the City of Pasco, and further, authorize publication by summary only. 88 - 146 (b) Q Ordinance - Olberding & Farm 2005 LLC (ZD 2021-003) MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4584, assigning zoning to the Olberding & Farm 2005 annexation area as recommended by the Hearing Examiner, and further, authorize publication by summary only. 147 - 188 (c) *Q Ordinance - Affinity and Hydro at Broadmoor Apartments Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUD 2021-001) MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4585, rezoning Lot 3 of the Broadmoor Parcel Segregation from R-T to R-4/PUD, and further, authorize publication by summary only. 10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 189 - 348 (a) 2021 Community Survey Highlights 12. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION 13. EXECUTIVE SESSION 14. ADJOURNMENT 15. ADDITIONAL NOTES (a) (RC) Roll Call Vote Required * Item not previously discussed Q Quasi-Judicial Matter MF# “Master File #....” 349 - 354 (b) Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only) Page 3 of 354 (c) REMINDERS • Monday, MARCH 21, 6:00 PM: LEOFF Disability Board – City Hall Conference Room 1, Pasco City Hall (MAYOR BLANCH BARAJAS, Rep.; MAYOR PRO TEM CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.) • Tuesday, MARCH 22, 5:00 PM: HAPO Center/TRAC Advisory Board Meeting – HAPO Center (COUNCILMEMBER JOSEPH CAMPOS and MAYOR PRO TEM CRAIG MALONEY) • Wednesday, MARCH 23, 7:30 AM: Visit Tri-Cities Board Meeting – 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd., Kennewick (COUNCILMEMBER ZAHRA ROACH, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Alt.) • Thursday, MARCH 24, 4:00 PM: TRIDEC Board Meeting – 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd., Kennewick (COUNCILMEMBER NIKKI TORRES, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Alt.) • Thursday, MARCH 24, 5:30 PM: Benton Franklin Community Action Connections Board Meeting – 720 Court Street, Pasco (COUNCILMEMBER ZAHRA ROACH, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Alt.) • Monday, MARCH 25, 4:00 PM: Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Advisory Committee Meeting – Ben Franklin Transit Main Conference Room (COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Rep.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) Page 4 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 16, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Debra Barham, City Clerk Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes I. REFERENCE(S): 03.7.2022 & 03.14.2022 Draft Council Minutes II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and Regular Workshop held on March 7, 2022 and March 14, 2022. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 5 of 354 MINUTES City Council Regular Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, March 7, 2022 City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Joseph Campos, Pete Serrano, Nikki Torres, David Milne, and Zahra Roach Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Adam Lincoln, Deputy City Manager; Colleen Chapin, Human Resources Director; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Bob Gear, Fire Chief; Zach Ratkai, Administrative & Community Services Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Richa Sigdel, Finance Director; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Steve Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA Approval of Meeting Minutes To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Regular Meeting and Regular Workshop held on February 22, 2022 and February 28, 2022. Bills and Communications To approve claims in the total amount of $3,707,967.39 ($2,158,048.82 in Check Nos. 246900-247134; $668,275.71 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 834498 -834523, 834531-834539, 834562-834647, 834650-834720, 834722-834748, 834756- 834758, 834762-834794, 834796-834850; $15,362.13 in Check Nos. 53843-53852; $866,210.66 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30172047 -30172574; $70.07 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 866-867). Page 1 of 6Page 6 of 354 Resolution - Bid Award for the Water Main Replacement - Maple Drive AC Main (Road 100 to Road 103) To approve Resolution No. 4156, awarding Bid No. 20030 for the Water Main Replacement - Maple Drive AC Main (Road 100 to Road 103) project to P&H Construction, LLC of Loon Lake, WA and further authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents and allowing all necessary budget adjustments. Resolution - Termination of Mid-Columbia Regional Cable Commission & Interlocal Agreement To approve Resolution No. 4157, authorizing the termination of the Mid -Columbia Regional Cable Commission and the Interlocal Agreement establishing the Commission between the Cities of Kennewick, Richland, and Pasco. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Serrano (RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS Felix Vargas, City of Pasco resident, commented on the Ukraine and Russian war. He suggested that Council adopt a resolution condemning the war and expressing support to the local Ukrainian population. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney stated the former Mayor, Matt Watkins is currently volunteering at the Poland border. Mr. Pete Rieke, City of Pasco resident, commented on the Parks Master Plan in which he is currently participating on developing through an advisory committee. He provided a handout to Council and asked Council to consid er those items on the handout at the next Council Retreat. Amanda Lorraine, City of Pasco resident and Grace Kitchen Executive Director, spoke about their request to the City of Pasco to allow Grace Kitchen to open a coffee bar in their retail store located in Pasco; however, since this has not been approved as of yet, Grace Kitchen will be opening their coffee bar in Kennewick, WA. Carl Holder, City of Pasco resident, also commented on the Ukraine / Russian war and expressed sympathy to the Ukrainians both located in Europe and in Pasco, WA. Next, he commented on the upcoming grand opening of the Mercado / Peanuts Park and expressed concern about the open sewage located in downtown alley -way. Page 2 of 6Page 7 of 354 Cynthia Muse, Franklin County resident, commented on the ne ed for the City to follow Columbia River shoreline plans. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS Verbal Reports from Councilmembers Mr. Campos commented on a recent ride-along with the Pasco Fire Department. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS Q Ordinance - Columbia Basin Health Association RT to C-1 Rezone (Z 2021- 018) Mayor Barajas announced that the proposed Ordinance rezoning the Columbia Basin Health Association property from RT to C-1 was a quasi-judicial action and asked Mr. Ferguson to explain the procedure for quasi-judicial items. Mr. Ferguson read the quasi-judicial procedure including how the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine applies to it. Next, he asked all Councilmembers a series of questions associated with potential conflicts of interest to disclose such potential conflicts or appearance of conflicts. With no response from the Councilmembers, he asked if any members of the public were seeking to disqualify a member of Council from participating in the proceedings. No one came forward. Mr. White provided a brief report on the proposed rezone. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney asked for an explanation of the names listed on page 46 of the agenda packet. Mr. White stated that was the names on the list were those persons notified of the proposed rezone. Mr. Serrano expressed concern about access to this area by pub lic transportation and that mitigation will be needed for that area as it builds out. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Torres to adopt Ordinance No. 4581, rezoning property located near the southeast corner of Road 68 and Burns Road from R-T to C-1, and further, authorize publication by summary only. RESULT: Motion carried 6-1 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach NAYS: Councilmember Serrano Page 3 of 6Page 8 of 354 Q Ordinance - Valdez C-1 to R-3 Rezone (Z 2021-019) Mayor Barajas announced that the Ordinance rezoning the Valdez property from C - 1 to R-3 was a quasi-judicial action and asked Mr. Ferguson to explain the procedure for quasi-judicial items. Mr. Ferguson read the quasi-judicial procedure including how the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine applies to it. Next, he asked all Councilmembers a series of questions associated with potential conflicts of interest to disclose such potential conflicts or appearance of conflicts. With no response from the Councilmembers, he asked if any members of the public were seeking to disqualify a member of Council from participating in the proceedings. No one came forward. Mr. White provided a brief report on the proposed rezone. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Roach to adopt Ordinance No. 4582, rezoning a parcel located at 523 West Bonneville Street from C-1 to R-3, and further, authorize publication by summary only. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach Resolution - Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing Mr. White provided an update related to the SRO Housing issue. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney stated that he is seeking additional data regarding SROs and is looking forward to a robust discussion when this item comes back for a public hearing in April 2022. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Serrano to approve Resolution No. 4158, declaring a moratorium prohibiting permitting Single Room Occupancy (SRO) Housing and conversion thereto in the City of Pasco, pending study of impact and best development practices and policy. RESULT: Motion carried 6-1 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach NAYS: Councilmember Campos Page 4 of 6Page 9 of 354 Resolutions - Project Acceptances - 1) South Maitland Lift Station; 2) 9th & Washington Lift Station; 3) West Court Street Overlay (Road 32 to Road 40); 4) Road 68 Widening - South of I-182 Mr. Worley introduced Construction Manager Kent McCue who provided a brief report on the four projects ready to be closed out and accepted by the City of Pasco. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Torres to approve Resolution No. 4159, accepting work performed by C&E Trenching, LLC under contract for the South Maitland Lift Station project. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Milne to approve Resolution No. 4160, accepting work performed by C&E Trenching, LLC. under contract for the 9th and Washington Lift Station project. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Campos to approve Resolution No. 4161, accepting work performed by Central Washington Asphalt, Inc. under contract for the West Court Street Overlay project. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved, seconded by Councilmember Torres to approve Resolution No. 4162, accepting work performed by Central Washington Asphalt, Inc. under contract for the Road 68 Widening - South of I- 182 project. RESULT: Motion carried unanimously 7-0 AYES: Mayor Barajas, Mayor Pro Tem Maloney, Councilmember Campos, Councilmember Serrano, Councilmember Torres, Councilmember Milne, and Councilmember Roach Page 5 of 6Page 10 of 354 MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION Mr. Zabell reported on the Community Forum held at the HAPO Center on Thursday, March 4, 2022. He announced the next Community Forum is scheduled on Thursday, March 11th, and the Peanuts Park grand opening is scheduled on Friday, March 12th. Mr. Ratkai updated Council on the Tri-Cities Animal Control and Animal Shelter currently under management by the Benton Franklin Humane Society. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney asked about the staffing levels for animal control and shelter and then advocated for the City to help fill the vacant staff positions as soon as possible. EXECUTIVE SESSION Council adjourned into Executive Session at 7:55 PM for 15 minutes to discuss with legal counsel about current or potential litigation per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager and the City Attorney. Mayor Barajas called the meeting back to order at 8:10 PM. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:10 PM. PASSED and APPROVED this ____ day of ________________, 20__. APPROVED: ATTEST: Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 6 of 6Page 11 of 354 MINUTES City Council Workshop Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, March 14, 2022 City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM by Blanche Barajas, Mayor. ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Joseph Campos, Pete Serrano, David Milne, Zahra Roach, and Nikki Torres Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Adam Lincoln, Deputy City Manager; Colleen Chapin, Human Resources Director; Craig Briggs, Assistant City Attorney; Bob Gear, Fire Chief; Zach Ratkai, Administrative & Community Services Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Richa Sigdel, Finance Director; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Steve Worley, Public Works Director; and Debby Barham, City Clerk. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS Mr. Campos commented on the Ben Franklin Transit Board meeting he attended recently. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney commented on the Peanuts Park and Mercado grand opening held on Friday, March 11th. He also commented on a local festival held at Peanuts Park on Saturday, March 12th. Ms. Torres commented on the Peanuts Park grand opening and Saturday festival. She also commented on a recent tour of Fire Station No. 83. Mr. Milne attended Peanuts Park grand opening. Mayor Barajas commented on the Peanuts Park grand opening. Page 1 of 4Page 12 of 354 ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Visit Tri-Cities 2021 Annual Report, 2022 Workplan, and Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) Reserve Fund Request Mr. Zabell introduced Michael Novakavich, President and CEO, with Visit Tri-Cities who provided the 2021 Annual Report, 2022 Workplan and TPA Reserve Fund request to reinvest into the Tri-Cities area. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney asked Mr. Novakavich if the current Single Resident Occupancy (SRO) development within the Tri-Cities area will have a (negative) effect on the TPA funding. Mr. Novakavich stated that the hotel stays are not up to full capacity at this time and looking at the long-term view, as those hotel/motel properties transition into SROs, he is hoping that developers will look at this area as an opportunity to invest in the community and build new hotels/motels to accommodate the Tri-Cities. Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Presentation Mr. Zabell introduced Michelle Holt, Executive Director with the Benton -Franklin Council of Governments (BFCOG) who provided a brief history of BFCOG, as well as it's mission, vision and 2021 activities. Council and Ms. Holt further discussed opportunities with the BFCOG that will benefit the City of Pasco directly, as well as in the greater Tri-Cities area for local and regional transportation projects. Technical Rescue Program Fire Chief Gear introduced Deputy Fire Chief Reid and Battalion Chief Donais who provided a presentation on the Fire Department's Technical Rescue Program, which includes three teams: Land Rescue Team, Water Rescue Team and Vehicle and Machinery Rescue Team. Public Records Requests Update Mr. Ratkai introduced City Clerk Debby Barham who provided a brief update on the City's public records requests and required reporting to the State of Washington. Ordinance - Amending PMC Title 3 Related to Miscellaneous Late Fees Ms. Sigdel introduced Finance Manager Darcy Buckley who provided a overview of the proposed amendments to miscellaneous late fees within the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) explaining that this action is to simplify the late fees process across the board. Page 2 of 4Page 13 of 354 American Rescue Plan Act Projects (ARPA) List and Staff Recommendations Mr. Zabell introduced Senior Management Analyst Angela Pashon who provided a an update on the ARPA approved projects, as well as the list of proposed projects and staff recommendations for the remaining ARPA funds. Council and staff discussion ensued regarding use of the ARPA funding and the proposed programs that were vetted and are candidates for the ARPA funding. RECESS: Mayor Barajas called a five-minute recess at 8:59 PM. Resolution - Bid Award Riverview East Sewer Lift Station Mr. Worley provided a brief report on the Riverview East Sewer Lift Station project, noting that the award of bid for this project will be coming back to Council for approval at the next Council Meeting. Ordinance - Amending Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) Related to Corner Lot Fencing (CA2021-009) Mr. White explained the safety issues associated with fencing on corner lots in residential areas and the need to update the PMC related corner lots fencing. He noted that this issued was fully vetted through the Planning Commission over several meetings throughout starting in August 2021 through January 2022. Council and staff continued the discussion regarding the proposed changes to the PMC for corner lots fencing standards. This item will come back to Council for final action at a future meeting (currently scheduled for April 4, 2022). Resolution - Emergency Agreement for Animal Control Services Mr. Ratkai provided a brief report regarding the emergency agreement for Animal Control Services and noted that this will come back for Council's ratification at their next meeting. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION Mr. Zabell noted that department staff presentations has been reintroduced and he thanked Council for their time in receiving these presentations. Next, he announced the Sylvester Street Safety Improvement Project open house was scheduled for Tuesday, March 15th and the Lewis Street Improvements Project open house was scheduled for the following week. He also commented on Washington State Governor's the recent removal of the mask mandate and updating the plexiglass window guards wit hin City Hall. Page 3 of 4Page 14 of 354 Mr. Zabell and Council discussed the potential retreat topics in anticipation of Council's upcoming retreat. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney asked for an update on the incident that occurred downtown on Sunday and resulted in two deaths. Police Deputy Chief Cook explained that little can be discussed at this time as it is currently an active Police investigation. Council expressed their condolences to the families of the persons' involved in the incident. EXECUTIVE SESSION Council adjourned into Executive Session at 10:00 PM for ten (10) minutes to discuss with legal counsel about legal risks of current or proposed action per RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Community & Economic Development Director and Assistant City Attorney. Mayor Barajas called the meeting back to order at 10:11 PM. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:11 PM. PASSED and APPROVED this __ day of ________________, 20__. APPROVED: ATTEST: Blanche Barajas, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk Page 4 of 4Page 15 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 15, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Finance Director Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance Amending Pasco Municipal Code - Title 3 Related to Miscellaneous Late Fees I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. ____, amending Pasco Municipal Code, chapter 3.70 the “Miscellaneous Billing Management,” and s ection 3.35.100 “Miscellaneous", related to late fees, and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Minimal revenue loss, offset by labor and any operational costs incurred in processing statements for delinquent accounts. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Depending upon the type of service, the City uses specific billing tools. Bill source and production is often tied to specialized accounting software that includes a methodology for billing and collection. The list of these uniquely handled services are utilities, ambulance transport, code enforcement and, in some cases, permitting and planning fees. Beginning in 2019, the City initiated use of the Miscellaneous Billing module of its financial software package, New World. The existing fee structure outlined in the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) for accounts billed as Miscellaneous Accounts Receivables that have been deemed past due is incompatible with processing possibilities in New World. Additionally, staff determined the late fee structure outlined in the PMC, if followed, not only required an inordinate amount of staff Page 16 of 354 time, but also presented a framework that imposes too many fees on customers and negatively delays complete payment by customers. In some cases, a fee structure exists based on a contractual agreement, for example, leases. In these cases, any agreed upon late structure will be followed, when consistent with New World billing capability. Otherwise, the late fee structure outlined in the PMC for miscellaneous accounts receivable will be followed. V. DISCUSSION: The existing PMC outlines the following fees for miscellaneous bills; late paym ent, phone and collection fee, pre-collection, collection turnover fee, an installment plan origination fee, and an installment plan monthly bill fee. The goal is to have customers successfully pay outstanding bills. As such staff's aim is to establish a billing structure that is simple to understand where late fee assessment is rare and nonpunitive. As complete payment is desired, payment arrangements are also allowed. Upon the agreement of the Council, the order of events and the new miscellaneous billing late fee structure will be as follows: 1. The customer is billed for service. This initial bill allows for thirty (30) days to pay in full or make a payment arrangement. 2. If full payment is not received or no payment arrangement is in effect, a second billing is produced with notice and a $10 late payment fee assessed. This second notice allows for another thirty (30) days. This late fee helps cover the cost of labor for repeat statement production, late fee assessment, posting, and mailing costs. 3. At the end of sixty (60) days since original bill creation, should a balance remain or no payment arrangement be in effect and followed, a third notice that acts as a final billing and pre-collection letter is produced. This final notice allows for another thirty (30) days for payment or payment arrangement. A $10 late fee is assessed. 4. Should an account remain past due with no active and followed payment arrangement at 120 days in arrears, the account information will be prepared with appropriate information for transfer of accounts to the collection agency. A $10 late fee is assessed. The requested, changed process will eliminate the phone and collection fee, the pre-collection fee, the installment plan origination fee, and the installment plan monthly bill fee. Page 17 of 354 Should the new miscellaneous accounts receivable late fee structure be approved, below is an outline of late fees associated with various billing systems maintained by the City. Source/Service Payment Arrangement Late Fee Notes Utilities Available $10 phone fee Partially offset the cost associated with operational cost - labor, services, and supplies Code Enforcement Available None- assessed as part of code board process NA Ambulance Transport Available None NA Miscellaneous: Examples, leases, cemetery, engineering services Available $10 late fee offset the Partially cost associated with operational cost - labor, services, and supplies As a public entity, the City is precluded from gifting public services. This requirement serves to ensure financial stewardship of the processes and services in place for public benefit, as well as to support equitable treatment for customers and citizens that receive those services. The imposition of a late fee is meant only to encourage prompt payment and help offset the cost of processing and overseeing late accounts. For these reasons, a change from the existing late fee structure to a simple, easy to process, and understand fee structure is requested. This item was discussed with Council at the March 14, 2022, Workshop meeting. Staff related PMC the amending adopting the recommends to ordinance miscellaneous late fees. Page 18 of 354 Ordinance – Amending PMC Related to Misc. Late Fees - 1 ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, AMENDING PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 3.70 THE “MISCELLANEOUS BILLING MANAGEMENT,” AND SECTION 3.35.100 “MISCELLANEOUS" FEES, RELATED TO LATE FEES. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (City) provides various services for the benefit of the public, which include associated fees, for those miscellaneous services, that are billed to its customers; and WHEREAS, the City is precluded from gifting public goods and services, which requires payment for such goods and services; and WHEREAS, delinquent payments for the fees incurred detrimentally affects the City’s cash flow and results in a greater effort in labor and supplies to redeem delinquent payments; and WHEREAS, the City’s Finance Department is desirous of updating its Miscellaneous Billing process and Miscellaneous Fee structure as it relates to late fees by making it simple to understand and apply late fees in the event of delinquent payments. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the PMC Chapter 3.70 “Miscellaneous Billing Management” is hereby amended and shall read as follows: Chapter 3.70 MISCELLANEOUS BILLING MANAGEMENT Sections: 3.70.010 Definitions. 3.70.020 Failure to receive mail – Change in address or ownership. 3.70.030 Order of payment. 3.70.040 Billing. 3.70.050 Delinquency. 3.70.060 Ambulance insurance coverage. 3.70.070 Cemetery services. 3.70.080 Installment payment plans. 3.70.090 Back bills – Prepayment required. 3.70.100 Hearing and appeal. 3.70.010 Definitions. For the purpose of this chapter, certain terms or words shall be interpreted or defined as follows. Except as defined in this section all words in this chapter shall Page 19 of 354 Ordinance – Amending PMC Related to Misc. Late Fees - 2 carry the customary meanings. Words used in the present tense include the future and the future includes the present and the plural includes the singular and the singular includes the plural. This chapter specifically excludes debts and services covered by Chapter 3.65 PMC, Utility Billing Management, or is set out by specific contract (e.g., rents), or is set out by specific ordinance or resolution (e.g., Local Improvement District debt). If contracts are silent as to payment terms or conditions, then this chapter shall apply. “Billing office” means the Finance Division office inside City Hall, which is located at 525 N 3rd Ave. Pasco, WA. It specifically excludes the drop box located at City Hall or any other location. “Debt” means amounts owed and due to the City for services rendered or to be rendered. “Director” means the Director of Finance, and his or her designee. “Miscellaneous Billing” means instances of City supplied services that require compensation but are not included in another existing billing software system or process. “Office business hours” means Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. excluding holidays when City offices are closed. “Office nonbusiness hours” means any days and hours not included in office business hours. “Paid” means payment that has been received, processed and posted to the customer’s account. [Code 1970 § 3.300.010.] 3.70.020 Failure to receive mail – Change in address or ownership. Failure to receive mail shall not be recognized as a valid excuse for failure to pay bills when due. Change in ownership of property and change in mailing address must be made in writing to the Finance Department. All bills and notices, including delinquency and collection notices shall be sent to the customer’s billing address provided the City. [Code 1970 § 3.300.020.] 3.70.030 Order of payment. Payments received shall be applied against outstanding charges in the following order: Interest and finance charges (where outlined in contractual agreement), late and penalty payment penalty, collection charges, then charges in the order listed on the invoice. Overpayments may be applied to other invoices for the same customer. If no other outstanding invoices exist, then the overpayment shall be refunded. Refunds will be issued within two weeks of the receipt of the overpayment. [Code 1970 § 3.300.030.] Page 20 of 354 Ordinance – Amending PMC Related to Misc. Late Fees - 3 3.70.040 Billing. All charges shall be due immediately upon billing and become delinquent if not paid in full to the billing office during office hours within 3028 days of the original bill date. Late payment fees, penalty and interest, where contractually outlined, and collections fees are considered delinquent when assessed. Bills shall include notice of availability of an installment payment plan when applicable and the process for the customer to request such a payment plan. [Code 1970 § 3.300.040.] 3.70.050 Delinquency. Delinquent bills shall be processed as follows: (1) Invoices that are not paid in full within 3028 days will incur a penalty known as a “late payment penalty” in an amount as set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC. A delinquent notice indicating the amount of the invoice and penalty will be mailed. The notice shall also include the timeline for the addition of future collection fees as outlined in subsections (2) and (3) of this section (at 38 days and 45 days) as well as the process for the customer to dispute charges or request a payment plan (if applicable). (2) Bills not paid in full within 38 days from the original bill date will incur a collection fee known as “phone and collection fee” in an amount as set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC. The customer will be called at the phone number provided by the customer to the City Finance Department. If no phone number is provided, the City, at a minimum, will check the local phone book to try and locate a phone number. The collection fee applies irrespective of the phone call outcome. (2)(3)If full payment is not received after 30 days from original billing a second billing will be produced. This billing will reflect the late payment penalty and begin a 30 day extension until a pre-collection process begins. (3) Should any portion of an account’s billed balance remain due to the City after 60 days from original billing date, a third and final billing will be produced. This billing will reflect a second late payment penalty and begin a 30 day extension until a pre-collection process begins. (4)(3) Bills not paid in full within 9045 days of the original bill date will be flagged to turn over to an outside collection agency for follow up. A “pre-collect” notice will be sent informing the customer they have 30 days to either pay in full (including penalties and collection charges) or dispute the charges, or their account will be turned over to an outside collection agency, and that an additional collection fee has been added. Customers will also be notified that once the bill (including penalties and collections charges) has been turned over for collection then their right to dispute charges isbecomes forfeited and the account will not be withdrawn from the outside collection process once it is turned over. A third late payment penalty will be assessed against the account with creation of the pre-collect notice. A collection fee known as a “pre-collection fee” in an amount as set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC will be added. Page 21 of 354 Ordinance – Amending PMC Related to Misc. Late Fees - 4 (5)(4)Bills (including penalties and collections charges) not paid in full within 12075 days of the original bill date and which are not in dispute and which are not covered by an installment payment plan will be turned over to an outside collection agency. Accounts turned over to an outside collection agency incur an additional late payment penalty fee collection fee by the City known as the “collection turnover fee” at the time of transfer as set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC and will incur interest charges at the maximum rate allowed by state law starting with the date of transfer. [Code 1970 § 3.300.050.] (6) At any time in this process, should the payments outlined in an installment payment plan not be upheld, the account will revert to pre-collection status, receive a final notice for full payment (including penalties), and follow the order of events and requirements like every other account in the pre-collect status. 3.70.060 Ambulance insurance coverage. The responsibility for payment of ambulance and medical service charges remains with the patient (or patient’s family if a minor). In the case of ambulance charges, if the customer assigns the right to collect payment from an insurance company and provides all information and approvals when requested, the City will bill the insurance company directly. Once the insurance company has paid, then the remaining amount will be billed to the customer per PMC 3.70.040. If the insurance company has not paid within 60 days, then the full amount will be billed to the customer per PMC 3.70.040. The customer may request an installment payment plan per PMC 3.70.080. If insurance proceeds are later received by the City then the overpayment will be refunded to the customer. [Code 1970 § 3.300.060.] 3.70.070 Cemetery services. All cemetery goods and services must be paid for either at the time of sale, or before burial; provided, however upon acceptance of application for time payment, the account may be paid over time as follows: 50 percent of the invoice must be paid prior to burial; the remaining amount exceeding $1,500 must be paid within 60 days. The last $1,500 must be paid no later than 12 months from the original invoice date. [Code 1970 § 3.300.070.] 3.70.080 Installment payment plans. Per PMC 3.60.040 credit cards are accepted for all billed debts. The City’s use of an installment payment plan is considered an alternativethe lender debtor of last resort, when there are no savings or other credit avenues available to debtor. An installment payment plan is not authorized merely as a mechanism for customer convenience. All installment payment plans must be in writing in a form prescribed by the City and signed or agreed upon in writing by both the customer and the Director. Installment payment plans are available as follows: (1) For debts owed by individuals only, installment plans are not available for debts owed by corporations, partnerships, businesses or other entities or associations. Page 22 of 354 Ordinance – Amending PMC Related to Misc. Late Fees - 5 (2) For debts as defined in PMC 3.70.010. (3) All installment payment plans must provide for payment in full within no later than 12 months of the original bill date with $100.00 per month as the recommended minimum payment. An applicant may request a financial hardship waiver from the Director who is authorized to set a lower monthly payment.Such lower payment shall be no less than $50.00 per month. (4) There shall be a charge known as the “installment plan origination fee” as well as a flat rate, per installment, processing fee known as the “installment processing fee.” Both amounts are set forth in Chapter 3.35 PMC. [Code 1970 § 3.300.080.] 3.70.090 Back bills – Prepayment required. An applicant who is liable to the City for unpaid, past due charges may be required to prepay for future services. Service may be denied to any person or persons who use any deceptive, unlawful, or misleading means or device whatsoever to avoid or minimize the payment for services or other charges owed. [Code 1970 § 3.300.090.] 3.70.100 Hearing and appeal. Any person aggrieved by the assessment of any charge, fee, or penalty, may, within 10 days of receipt of the City’s billing to which they are objecting, in writing upon a form provided by the City, request an informal administrative hearing before the Director. The Director hearing this dispute shall be authorized to correct any errors to the customer’s billing. The appeal hearing shall be scheduled by the Director at City Hall and conducted during regular business hours within seven business days of receipt of the appeal. A written decision shall be delivered to the customer at the address designated on the appeal within 10 days of the hearing. [Ord. 4161, 2014; Code 1970 § 3.300.100.] Section 2. That the PMC, Section 3.26.100 “Miscellaneous,” under Division II Fees, is hereby amended and shall read as follows: 3.35.100 Miscellaneous. Fee/Charge Reference Photocopy fees – per copy $0.15 Admin. Order 42 Returned payment fee $25.00 3.60.010 Late payment penalty $10.00 3.70.050(1) Phone and collection fee $10.00 3.70.050(2) Precollection fee $10.00 3.70.050(3) Page 23 of 354 Ordinance – Amending PMC Related to Misc. Late Fees - 6 Fee/Charge Reference Collection turnover fee (charges, penalties and fees) 5% 3.70.050(4) Installment plan origination fee ($10.00 min) 3% 3.70.080(4) Installment plan monthly bill fee $5.00 3.70.070 [Ord. 4338, 2017; Ord. 4161, 2014; Ord. 3926, 2009; Ord. 3713, 2005; Ord. 3553, 2002; Ord. 3543, 2002; Code 1970 § 3.07.090.] Section 3. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ____ day of __________ 2022. _____________________________ Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ ____________________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Published: _____________________________ Page 24 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 15, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Steve Worley, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Resolution - Bid Award Riverview East Sewer Lift Station I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution Bid Tabs Vicinity Map PowerPoint Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ________, awarding Bid No. 19053 for the Riverview East Sewer Lift Station (aka Road 52 & Pearl Street Lift Station) project to Big D's construction of Tri-Cities, Inc. of Pasco, Washington, and further authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents and allowing all necessary budget adjustments. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Proposed Contract Award: $936,885.68 2021-2022 Adopted Budget: Sewer Fund (450) $1,400,000 Secured 2017 Utility Revenue Bond $ 300,000 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The Riverview East Sewer Lift Station project, originally titled Road 52 & Pearl Lift Station, is intended to support development within the East Riverview area at an appropriate density. The construction of this lift station will make properties within this sub-basin area (as described in the 2020 Sewer Comprehensive Plan Addendum) able to be served with City Sanitary Sewer. Page 25 of 354 The work to be performed includes: • installation of a new packaged sewer lift station (two pumps at 120 GPM each) with associated site improvements • installation of approximately 2,200 linear feet of 4 -inch-diameter force main • installation of approximately 400 linear feet of 12 -inch-diameter gravity sewer main The lift station will have the capacity to reliably serve 267 Equivalent Residential Units (ERUs). A development with 56 ERUs to be served by this lift station is currently going through the plat process. Similar developments within this basin are anticipated to follow in the near term. This contract provides the Contractor one-hundred and twenty (120) working days to physically complete the work. V. DISCUSSION: The project was advertised for bids on January 28, 2022. On February 17, 2022, bids were publicly opened. A total of six (6) bids were received. The lowest responsible, responsive bidder is Big D's Construction of Pasco, WA in the amount of $936,885.68. The Engineer's Estimate is $1,102,478.96. Based on the bids received, the project is anticipated to be completed within budget and no budget adjustments are necessary at this time. The Engineer of Record and City staff completed the review of the bid submittal and found no exemptions or irregularities. This item was presented to Council on March 14, 2022, at the Council Workshop Meeting. Staff recommends award of the contract to Big D's Construction of Pasco, WA. Page 26 of 354 Resolution – Bid Award for the Riverview East Sewer Lift Station (Road 52 &Pearl) project - 1 RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AWARDING BID NO. 19053 FOR THE RIVERVIEW EAST SEWER LIFT STATION (AKA ROAD 52 & PEARL STREET LIFT STATION) PROJECT TO BIG D’S CONSTRUCTION OF TRI-CITIES, INC. OF PASCO, WASHINGTON AND FURTHER AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ALLOWING ALL NECESSARY BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has an identified capital improvement public works project described as the Riverview East Sewer Lift Station (AKA Road 52 & Pearl Street Lift Station), hereinafter “the project”; and WHEREAS, the project includes installation of a new packaged sewer lift station with associated site improvements, installation of approximately 2,200 linear feet of 4 -inch-diameter force main, and installation of approximately 400 linear feet of 12-inch-diameter gravity sewer main; and WHEREAS, the City solicited sealed public bids for the project; and WHEREAS, on February 17, 2022, at 2:00 p.m., six (6) bids were received and opened by the City; and WHEREAS, the lowest responsive bidder was Big D’s Construction with a Bid of $936,885.68, the Engineer’s Estimate was $1,102,478.96; and WHEREAS, the bid documentation was reviewed and the bidder was determined to be responsible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the City hereby awards the project to Big D’s Construction of Tri-Cities, Inc. of Pasco, Washington in the amount of $936,885.68, including Washington State Sales Tax; and Page 27 of 354 Resolution – Bid Award for the Riverview East Sewer Lift Station (Road 52 &Pearl) project - 2 Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately upon passage by the City Council. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of March, 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Page 28 of 354 Bid Tabulations -Riverview East Sewer lift Station (Rd 52 & Pearl) Project #19053 Bid Date: February 17, 2.022 Item No. Description Quant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Mobilization Pothole Existing Utility Clearing and Grubbing Site Work Temporary Shoring for Lift Station Excavation Package Lift Station Electrical and Co1trols PVC 55 Pipe 12-in Diam. PVC 55 Pipe 8-in Diam. DI 55 Pipe 4-in Diam. Manhole 48-in Diam. Type 1 Connect to Existing Manhole Bedding Select Backfill Trench Shoring Pavement Preparation Crushed Surfacing Base Course Crushed Surfacing Top Course Cold Mix Asphalt Temporary Patch Hot Mix Asphalt Trench Patch Adjust Monument Case and Cover Unscheduled Excavation Dewatering and Control of Discharge Water Sediment and Erosion Control Project Temporary Traffic Control Construction Survey Testing and Startup O&M Manuals and On-Site Owner Training Record Drawings Minor Change Fc>rce Account Riverview East Sewer Lift Station Bid Opening 2-1 i'-22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 380 10 2218 1 1 400 500 2608 1 370 430 164 164 1 230 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Contractor: Engineer's Estimate Big D's Construction Unit Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount LS $75,300.00 $ 75,300.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 EA $1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 LS $6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 LS $48,000.00 $ 48,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 LS $52,000.00 $ 52,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 LS $254,000.00 $ 254,000.00 $ 165,000.00 $ 165,000.00 LS $172,500.00 $ 172,500.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 LF $134.00 $ 50,920.00 $ 130.00 $ 49,400.00 LF $100.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 100.00 s 1,000.00 LF $52.00 $ 115,336.00 $ 22.00 $ 48,796.00 EA $6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 LS $5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 TON $20.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 15.00 $ 6,000.00 TON $20.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 15.00 $ 7,500.00 LF $1.00 $ 2,608.00 $ 1.00 $ 2,608.00 LS $13,000.00 $ 13,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 TON $30.00 $ 11,100.00 $ 20.00 $ 7,400.00 TON $37.00 $ 15,910.00 $ 20.00 $ 8,600.00 TON $110.00 $ 18,040.00 $ 120.00 $ 19,680.00 TON $190.00 $ 31,160.00 $ 140.00 $ 22,960.00 EA $1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 CY $20.00 s 4,600.00 $ 25.00 $ 5,750.00 LS $55,000.00 s 55,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 LS $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 LS $12,000.00 s 12,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 LS $8,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 LS $6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 LS $6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 LS $5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 LS $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Subtotal: $ 1,015,174.00 862,694.00 Subtotal: $ 1,015,174.00 862,694.00 WA St Sales Tax (8.6%): $ 87,304.96 $ $ $ 74,191.68 GRAND TOTAL: $ 1,102,478.96 $ 936,885.68 Controctor: Contractor: C&E Trenching DW Excavating Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount $ 44,400.00 $ 44,400.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 815.00 $ 815.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 s 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 57,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 180,000.00 $ 180,000.00 $ 202,000.00 $ 202,000.00 $ 185,000.00 $ 185,000.00 $ 185,000.00 $ 185,000.00 $ 140.00 $ 53,200.00 $ 215.00 $ 81,700.00 $ 200.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 218.00 $ 2,180.00 $ 22.00 $ 48,796.00 $ 41.00 $ 90,938.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 7,800.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 25.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 25.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 20.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 29.00 $ 14,500.00 $ 1.00 $ 2,608.00 $ 1.30 $ 3,390.40 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,800.00 $ 5,800.00 $ 22.00 $ 8,140.00 $ 37.00 $ 13,690.00 $ 22.00 $ 9,460.00 $ 37.00 $ 15,910.00 $ 135.00 $ 22,140.00 $ 183.00 $ 30,012.00 $ 150.00 $ 24,600.00 $ 152.00 $ 24,928.00 s 2,500.00 s 2,500.00 $ 900.00 $' 900.00 $ 18.00 $ 4,140.00 $ 22.00 $ 5,060.00 s 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 17,700.00 $ 17,700.00 s 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 11,300.00 $ 11,300.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 7,300.00 $ 7,300.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 11,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 986.91 $ 986.91 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 876,084.00 $ 920,810.31 $ 876,084.00 $ 920,810.31 $ 75,343.22 $ 79,189.69 $ 951,427.22 $ 1,000,000.00 Page 1 of2 Page 29 of 354 Page 30 of 354 VICINITY MAP Page 31 of 354 Pasco City Council Workshop Meeting March 14, 2022Page 32 of 354 PWRF Irrigation Pump Station -Before VICINITY MAP Page 33 of 354 PWRF Irrigation Pump Station -In-Progress RIVERVIEW EAST SEWER BASIN AREA Page 34 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 15, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Zach Ratkai, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Resolution - Emergency Agreement for Animal Control Services I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Resolution Proposed Agreement II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: the approving ________, No. move approve to I Resolution Emergency Services Agreement with Benton Franklin Humane Societ y for Animal Control and Sheltering Services, and further authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. III. FISCAL IMPACT: $126,072 - Total Per Month, divided in 3 between Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland $42,024 - Monthly Share from City of Pasco IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On November 11, 2021, Benton Franklin Human Society (BFHS) took over the Tri-Cities Animal Shelter including all operations for regional animal control, shelter operations, and personnel management. This was an urgent and emergency action initiated due to law enforcement action against the previous contractor, which prompted their unplanned dismissal. Since that time, BFHS has operated the Tri-Cities Animal Shelter facility in addition to their main facility located in Kennewick to the best of their ability. The attached agreement contains the standard legal language for a Personal Services Agreement as drafted by the City Legal staff. The scope of work Page 35 of 354 included within outlines the details of contracted work for BFHS during this emergency period. V. DISCUSSION: This is a retroactive contract that needed time between the Animal Control Authority (ACA) and BFHS to negotiate and settle on final language, funding, and course of action. BFHS has been in compliance with the tenets of the contract since their take over date. Staff recommends Council ratify this contract through resolution. This item was discussed at the March 14th Workshop meeting. Page 36 of 354 Resolution – BF Humane Society Emergency Agreement RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE EMERGENCY SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE BENTON FRANKLIN HUMANE SOCIETY FOR ANIMAL CONTROL AND SHELTERING SERVICES. WHEREAS, the Cities of Pasco, Richland and Kennewick Washington on December 16, 2016 entered into an Interlocal agreement establishing the Tri-City Animal Control Authority for Animal Control and Sheltering Services; and WHEREAS, said agreement designated the City of Pasco, Washington as the Operating Jurisdiction for the Tri-City Animal Control Authority; and WHEREAS, on November 11, 2021, due to termination of the prior contractor for cause, and on an emergency basis, the Benton-Franklin Humane Society was granted operational control of the facility; and WHEREAS, after operational practices and standard were stabilized, the ACA and BFHS negotiated a temporary Personal Services Agreement to officially ratify the relationship; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, has after due consideration, determined that it is in the best interest of the City of Pasco to enter into an Emergency Services Agreement with Benton Franklin Humane Society; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Pasco approves the terms and conditions of the Emergency Services Agreement with Benton Franklin Humane Society, as attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. Section 2. The City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Pasco. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington and approved as provided by law this _____ day of ________________, 2022. _______________________ Blanch Barajas, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Page 37 of 354 PERSONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES FOR THE ANIMAL CONTROL AUTHORITY OF KENNEWICK, PASCO & RICHLAND THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between The Benton-Franklin Co. Humane Society, hereinafter referred to as “Contractor” and the Tri-City Animal Control Authority, hereinafter referred to “ACA”, an unincorporated association comprised of the cities of Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland, political subdivisions of the State of Washington, on this 11th day of November, 2021. ARTICLE 1. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT 1.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to establish the relationship between the ACA and the Contractor. The Contractor shall provide animal control services in specified areas within Benton and Franklin Counties for the cities of Kennewick, Pasco and Richland as specified herein. In consideration for said services, the ACA shall pay the Contractor in U.S. funds such moneys and in such manner as herein described. ARTICLE 2. WHOLE AGREEMENT 2.1 This is the complete and exclusive statement of the agreement between the parties relevant to the purpose described above and supersedes all prior agreements or proposals, oral or written, and all other communication between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. No modification of this Agreement will be binding on either party except as a written addendum signed by authorized agents of both parties. ARTICLE 3. WRITTEN NOTICE 3.1 Any notice of change, termination or other communication having a material effect on this Agreement shall be served in one or more of the following manners: a. In-person delivery to the Pasco City Clerk if delivering to the Authority; an authorized officer, employee, agent or other representative if delivering to the Contractor. b. Deposited in the U.S. mails under certified or registered handling, postage prepaid, posted to the address(es) provided herein: City of Pasco Contractor Dave Zabell, City Manager Benton-Franklin Humane Society PO Box 293 ATTN: Executive Director Pasco, WA 99301 1736 E. 7th Ave Telephone: (509) 544-3404 Kennewick, WA 99337 c. By e-mail sent to either party. Page 38 of 354 Article 4. GOVERNING LAW/VENUE 4.1 This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. Any action or suit commenced in connection with this Agreement shall be in the Franklin County Superior Court. 4.1.1 All rights and remedies of either party shall be cumulative and may be exercised successively or concurrently. The foregoing is without limitation to or waiver of any other rights or remedies of either party according to law. It is agreed that fifteen (15) calendar days shall constitute reasonable notice for the exercise of any right in the event that applicable law specifically requires such notice, unless a more specific time frame is required by applicable statute. ARTICLE 5. ATTORNEY FEES 5.1 Attorney’s fees, which are reasonable, and costs including those in appeal, if appeal is taken, shall be allowed to the prevailing party by any court hearing a dispute under this Agreement. ARTICLE 6. JUDICIAL RULINGS 6.1 If any provision of this Agreement, as applied to either party or to any circumstance, shall be adjudged by a court to be void or unenforceable the same shall in no way affect any other provision or the validity or enforceability of this Agreement. ARTICLE 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 7.1 The Contractor shall be an "independent contractor." All persons employed to furnish services hereunder are employees of the Contractor and not of the ACA. Further, the ACA shall not be liable for any of Contractor's acts or omissions performed under this Agreement or other agreements to which Contractor is a party. ARTICLE 8. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS 8.1 The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the ACA and the individual Cities of Kennewick, Pasco, and Richland, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. The City shall defend, indemnify and hold the Contractor and their officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, whether known or unknown, including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the prior performance, negligence, malfeasance, acts, or omissions of previous contractors of the ACA. Page 39 of 354 It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Contractor's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE 9. INSURANCE 9.1 The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement. insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Minimum scope of insurance and minimum insurance limits of the types described below shall be maintained by the Contractor. a. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, stop gap liability, personal injury and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract. The Commercial General Liability insurance shall be endorsed to provide a per project general aggregate limit using ISO form CG 25 03 05 09 or an equivalent endorsement. The ACA shall be named as an additional insured under the Contractor’s Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the ACA using ISO Additional Insured endorsement CG 20 10 10 01 and Additional Insured-Completed Operations endorsement CG 20 37 10 01 or substitute endorsements providing at least as broad coverage. The ACA consisting of City of Kennewick, PO Box 6108, Kennewick WA 99336; City of Pasco, PO Box 293, Pasco WA 99301; and City of Richland, 505 Swift Blvd., Richland WA 99352, shall be named as additional insureds under the Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the ACA. b. Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 per each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and $2,000,000 products completed operations aggregate limit. c. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on ISO form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. d. Automobile Liability insurance shall have a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Page 40 of 354 e. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. f. Law Enforcement Professional insurance in the amount of $500,000. 9.2 Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance: a. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to this Contract. Any Insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the ACA shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. b. The Contractor's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the ACA. 9.3 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A: VII. 9.4 Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the ACA with original Certificates of Insurance and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Contractor before commencement of the work. 9.5 Subcontractors Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insured's under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the same insurance requirements as stated herein for the Contractor. The Contractor shall ensure that the ACA is an additional insured on each and every Subcontractor’s Commercial General Liability insurance policy using an endorsement as least as broad as ISO CG 20 10 10 01 for ongoing operations and CG 20 37 10 01 for completed operations. ARTICLE 10. NONDISCRIMINATION 10.1 The Contractor agrees to abide by all Federal, State and/or local ordinances prohibiting discrimination with regard to employment and client services. If the Contractor subcontracts, said subcontract shall include appropriate safeguards against discrimination in such services and employment binding upon each Contractor or subcontractor. The Contractor shall take such action as may be required to insure full compliance with this clause, including sanctions for noncompliance. Any violations of this provision shall be Page 41 of 354 considered a material violation of this Agreement and shall be grounds for cancellation, termination or suspension in whole or in part by the ACA. ARTICLE 11. NONASSIGNMENT 11.1 No portion of nor any interest in this Agreement may be assigned to a third party without the prior written approval of the ACA. ARTICLE 12. USE OF ACA FACILITIES 12.1 By and through this Agreement, Contractor and its employees or agents shall have the right to use such portions of the Animal Shelter, which is leased to the ACA by the City of Pasco. The leased premises shall constitute those areas that are designated by the ACA for Contractor's use and determined to be necessary to perform the required services under this Agreement. Contractor shall have no right of access to any other facilities of the ACA without the prior approval of the ACA Management Committee. The shelter is currently located at 1312 S. 18th Ave. Pasco, Washington. Contractor's use of the premises shall be subject to the following: 12.1.1 Permitted Use: a. The premises shall be used for animal control operations conducted for the cities of Kennewick, Washington, Pasco, Washington, and Richland, Washington pursuant to enforcement of Tri-City Animal Control Authority agency ordinances and for no other purpose without the written consent of the ACA. b. The ACA shall have the right to lease unused areas in the shelter, provided that the ACA and Contractor shall work cooperatively to determine the best utilization of the space in the facility. 1. Restrictions on Use: In connection with the use of the Premises, Contractor shall: A. Conform to all applicable laws and regulations of any public authority affecting the Premises and its use thereof. B. Refrain from any activity (other than those activities within Contractor's normal and customary course of conduct) that would make it impossible to insure the Premises against casualty or that would substantially increase the insurance rate. C. Refrain from any use that creates a nuisance. D. Refrain from loading the electrical system or floors beyond the point considered safe by a competent engineer or architect selected by Landlord. Page 42 of 354 E. Not cause or permit any Hazardous Substance to be spilled, leaked, disposed of, or otherwise released on the Premises. F. Not cause or permit litter, garbage or other refuse or debris to accumulate on the Premises except in suitable garbage containers. 2. Repairs and Maintenance: The ACA shall be responsible for all repairs and maintenance necessitated by Contractor's reasonable use and occupancy, including, but not limited to the following: A. Repairs of the roof and gutters, exterior walls, bearing walls, structural members, floor slabs and foundation. B. Repair of exterior water, sewage and electrical services up to the point of entry to the Premises. C. Repair of heating and cooling systems. D. Repair of interior walls, ceilings, doors, windows, and related hardware, light fixtures, switches, wiring and plumbing. 3. Alterations: A. Contractor Alterations Prohibited. Contractor shall make no improvements or alterations on the Premises of any kind without first obtaining the ACA's written consent. All alterations shall be made in a good and workman-like manner, and in compliance with plans submitted to and approved by the Landlord and in accordance with applicable laws and building codes. B. Ownership and Removal of Alterations. All improvements and alterations performed on the Premises by Contractor shall be the property of Landlord when installed unless the applicable Landlord's consent specifically provides otherwise. Improvements and alterations installed by Contractor shall, at Landlord's option, be removed by Contractor and the Premises restored, at Contractors expense, unless the applicable Landlord's consent specifically provides otherwise. 4. Property Insurance and Waiver of Subrogation: City of Pasco shall purchase and maintain during the term of the lease all-risk property insurance covering the Building for its full replacement value without any coinsurance provisions. Page 43 of 354 Contractor and City of Pasco hereby release and discharge each other from all claims, losses and liabilities arising from or caused by any hazard covered 100% by property insurance on or in connection with the premises of said building. This release shall apply only to the extent that such claim, loss or liability is covered 100% by insurance. City of Pasco will insure personal property of the ACA in the amount equal to the value of the ACA-owned inventory and is under no obligation to insure any of Contractor's personal property located in the Premises. 5. Utilities: ACA shall provide and pay for the following utilities: electric service, gas, water and sewer services. Contractor shall provide telephone and communication services, garbage disposal services, janitorial services, and security services as needed. 6. Damage or Destruction: If the Premises are damaged or destroyed in whole or in part by no fault of Contractor, and Contractor is unable to provide services required by Agreement, the ACA may, at its option, elect to terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days’ notice. 7. Surrender: Upon expiration of the Agreement term or earlier termination as provided herein, Contractor shall surrender the Premises in the same condition as at the commencement of its use, reasonable wear and tear expected. ARTICLE 13. RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 13.1 The ACA shall have no responsibility for the loss, theft, mysterious disappearance or damage to all equipment, tools, materials, supplies and other personal property of Contractor or its employees, agents or subcontractors, which may be stored on ACA premises. Contractor shall provide the ACA an inventory of property no later than January 15, each year. Upon termination or expiration of this Agreement a walk-through of the premises shall be performed to reconcile the inventory of property. Failure to participate in the post-service walk-through by the Contractor shall constitute a waiver of any claim to ownership of disputed equipment or inventory. ARTICLE 14. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT 14.1 This Agreement may be terminated under the following conditions: Page 44 of 354 a. By written mutual agreement of both parties. Termination under this provision may be immediate. b. Without cause upon six (6) months written notice by either party to the other of intent to terminate. c. The ACA may in its sole discretion, unilaterally terminate this contract on thirty (30) days written notice for documented performance failures pursuant to this agreement. Contractor maybe allowed 30 days to correct conditions not in compliance with this Agreement. At its sole discretion, the ACA may extend the 30-day cure period based upon the progress of the Contractor to correct conditions in the initial 30-day period or any factors outside the control of the Contractor that prevent correcting the condition within the initial 30 days. i. The ACA may, in its sole discretion, unilaterally terminate this contract, without notice, for emergency law enforcement action such as a criminal investigation, criminal charges or civil complaint against the Contractor, its agents, employees, assigns or subcontractors related to the performance of this agreement. d. Upon thirty (30) days’ notice by the ACA, in the event of property loss of the leased premises, natural disaster preventing performance under this Agreement. e. The Contractor may in its sole discretion, unilaterally terminate this contract on thirty (30) days written notice for documented performance failures pursuant to this agreement. ACA may be allowed 30 days to correct conditions not in compliance with this Agreement. At its sole discretion, the Contractor may extend the 30-day cure period based upon the progress of the ACA to correct conditions in the initial 30-day period or any factors outside the control of the ACA that prevent correcting the condition within the initial 30 days. If this Agreement is terminated by either party, the ACA agrees to pay to the Contractor all costs and expenses associated with services provided to the effective day of termination. Monies due and payable will be pro-rated based on the number of service days performed through the date of termination. Notwithstanding any termination hereunder, all requirements of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect through the date of termination upon written notice. ARTICLE 15. STANDARD OF SERVICES 15.1 Contractor agrees to perform services with the standard of skill and diligence normally provided by a professional organization in the performance of similar services. It is understood that the Contractor must perform the services based in part on information furnished by ACA and that Contractor shall be entitled to rely on such information. However, Contractor is given notice that ACA will be relying on the accuracy, level of Page 45 of 354 competence and completeness of Contractor's services in utilizing the results of such services. To further this level of service, the Contractor will develop, within 90 days of the beginning of this Agreement, a set of written operational procedures relating to daily operations, including but not limited to euthanasia procedures. Such procedures shall be subject to the approval of the ACA and the Contractor will be accountable for compliance with such procedures. 15.2 Additional standards of service requirements shall include, but not be limited to, the following: • Maintain good customer service skills. • Animals and residents shall be treated respectfully and courteously at all times. • Encourage community involvement through volunteer opportunities if desired by contractor • Be responsive to city/citizen requests. • Maintain a professional appearance. • Maintain professionalism with the public and public agencies. 15.3 Contractor warrants that the recommendations, guidance, training and performance of any person assigned under this Agreement shall be in accordance with generally-accepted practices for handling and treatment of animals, professional standards and applicable regulatory practices, and requirements of this Agreement. ARTICLE 16. TERM OF AGREEMENT 16.1 This is an emergency contract that shall be effective November 11, 2021 until May 31, 2022, at which time this contract shall terminate and be replaced with a new contract, unless either party elects not to enter into such new contract. ARTICLE 17. SURVIVAL 17.1 The terms, conditions, representations, and all warranties contained in this Agreement shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. ARTICLE 18. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONTRACTOR 18.1 See Attachment A – Scope of Work. ARTICLE 19. FEES 19.1 The Contractor agrees to provide animal control services as herein specified and in the manner specified. The ACA shall have no liability for taxes, insurance or other expenses associated with the performance of the Contractor's duties hereunder. The ACA shall compensate the Contractor in monthly installments in an amount according to the Compensation Schedule included with Attachment B. The Contractor shall be responsible Page 46 of 354 for collecting appropriate impounding fees and boarding fees and shall be responsible for remittance to the Cities according to the Fee Schedule included with Attachment C. ARTICLE 20. METHOD OF PAYMENT 20.1 Payment shall be made within 10 days upon receipt by ACA of a written invoice to be provided to ACA by Contractor at the end of the month in which services were rendered. ARTICLE 21. PUBLICITY 21.1 Contractor shall not use in its external advertising, marketing programs, or other promotional efforts any data, pictures, or other representations of the ACA except on prior specific written authorization from ACA. ARTICLE 22. SUBCONTRACTING 22.1 The Contractor shall not employ other subcontractors without prior written approval of the ACA nor shall the duties of the Contractor under the contract be delegated without prior written approval of the ACA. Unless otherwise expressly agreed by ACA, the Contractor shall remain responsible for the quality and timeliness of performance notwithstanding any delegation of said required performance. 22.2 The Contractor will assume full responsibility for administering and managing all of its subcontractor(s). All ACA communications concerning any subcontractor will be directed through the Contractor's resident general manager. 22.3 The ACA may enter into agreement with other jurisdictions in the area to provide animal control services. Contractor shall enter into these agreements only upon mutual written agreement between the ACA and Contractor. The Contractor is prohibited from entering into agreements or providing animal control services with other jurisdictions without prior written approval of the ACA. ARTICLE 23. INSPECTIONS AND RECORDS 23.1 The Contractor shall submit to inspections of the premises and records by representatives of the ACA at any time, without prior notice. Such inspections may include, but not limited to, financial audits, records audits, inspection of kennels, or observation of procedures. The Contractor will also submit to inspection and oversight by a professional oversight committee appointed by the ACA. Contractor agrees to maintain all records with respect to services provided under this Agreement for six (6) years and shall maintain such records in such a manner as to preserve those records in case of a public records request. Contractor shall fully comply with ACA and Cities to respond to applicable requests for public records. Page 47 of 354 ARTICLE 24. SIGNATURE PAGE 24.1 The Contractor and the ACA hereby agree to all provisions of the Agreement. Signed this ______ day of ______________ 2022, Pasco. Washington. CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON CONTRACTOR Dave Zabell, City Manager Cecilia O’Shaughnessy, Board President, Benton-Franklin Humane Society ATTEST: __________________________________ Autumn White, Executive Director Debra Barham, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC, City Attorney Page 48 of 354 ATTACHMENT A – SCOPE OF SERVICES DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CONTRACTOR Enforcement of Animal Regulatory Laws The Contractor shall be fully responsible for taking animals into custody, transporting animals, administering and enforcing animal control regulations, investigating animal control complaints, as well as enforcing action(s) in accordance with the Cities' respective municipal codes and the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). Responsibilities of the Contractor shall include, but may not be limited to, the following: 1. Field Service Calls: The Contractor shall initiate within one business day during normal business hours of the Shelter, an investigation and follow up on all animal control complaints referred to it by the public, appropriate officers, health services or other entities where the complaints constitute violations of Kennewick, Pasco or Richland municipal codes. Records shall be kept on each complaint, to include action(s) taken and disposition(s). Examples of field service calls may include but are not limited to: • Domestic animal at large • Barking dog • Unlicensed dog or cat in participating cities • Dog or cat with no rabies vaccination • Dog threatens person • Dog threatens domestic animal • Dog or cat bite • Injured or sick domestic animal • Assist law enforcement agencies upon request • Abandoned animal • Animal cruelty • Dead on arrival dog or cat • Confined dog or cat • Trapping dog or cat • Dangerous or potentially dangerous dog • Kennel inspections • Dangerous dog inspections • Inherently dangerous mammal or reptile inspections • Special Assistance 2. Apprehension: Apprehend and impound stray dogs and cats. The Contractor shall direct its animal control officer(s) to return the dog or cat to the owner, if known, while the officer is in the field and issue a written warning or civil citation to the owner instead of impounding the animal for a first-time offense. Subsequent offenses shall be impounded. Vicious animals at large must be impounded including first-time offenses. Complete and accurate records of all apprehensions and impounds, including disposition of the animal, shall be maintained. 3. Secure evidence of suspected violators: Evidence shall be recorded, properly identified, and stored in a secure location. Page 49 of 354 4. Distressed Animals: Animals in distress, including hardship cases, such as owner arrest or house fires, must be impounded. If a distressed animal cannot be safely impounded, based on the professional opinion of a qualified veterinarian, it must be destroyed immediately. The method used for euthanasia must be approved by the ACA. 5. Hazard Removal: Dead animals whose owners are unknown and which constitutes a traffic hazard on City roadways and Rights-of-Way must be removed. In instances where a hazard exists which is a violation of local ordinance but the animal is alive, the animal shall be impounded. The Contractor shall not be responsible for the collection and disposal of dead animals found on private property. 6. Disposal of Dead Animals: The Contractor shall pick up and remove small or large dead animals from City roadways and Rights-of-Way within six (6) hours of notification during normal business hours. If outside of normal business hours, the dead animals shall be removed within sixteen (16) hours of initial notification. 7. Emergency Response: The Contractor for animal control enforcement shall be available twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week, on an emergency response basis. Emergency response shall be for any of the following: a. Vicious animals, or animals wild or domestic that may reasonably constitute a hazard to persons or other animals or threaten public safety. b. Animals with life-threatening injuries. c. Hardship cases or law enforcement assistance matters. d. Special Assistance. 8. Court Appearances: The Contractor's personnel may, on occasion, be required to appear in court in support of enforcement action. The Contractor shall not receive additional compensation for these appearances and shall be timely and professional in all such appearances. 9. Special Assistance: From time to time special assistance may be required to respond to unique circumstances and/or animal care needs. Such special assistance or care shall be the responsibility of the Contractor. 10. Citation Authority: Issue civil citations for the violation of animal regulatory ordinances. 11. Reporting: Provide complete and accurate reports, in a format approved by the ACA, to the Cities by the 15th of the following month pertaining to the enforcement activities. 12. Telephone: Provide a telephone call receiving system that can accommodate high call volume and ensure that a message can be left if a person is not available to receive the call. Contractor shall use best efforts to ensure that phone messages are retrieved within 10 minutes. Emergency callers shall be contacted immediately upon receipt of the message. Page 50 of 354 After hour emergency calls shall be routed to an on-call employee or answering service. All calls for service shall be logged and a disposition recorded. 13. Enforcement Officers: A minimum of one enforcement officer will have at least three (3) years’ experience in animal control enforcement and will possess current enforcement certification. (These requirements may be temporarily waived by agreement of the Contractor and ACA). All enforcement officers will obtain certification within the minimum time period and will maintain current status of certification. All enforcement officers shall be suitably uniformed to present a clean, respectable image to the public. The Contractor shall be responsible for securing limited enforcement-commissions from each City to enable the officers to enforce the terms of the Cities' animal regulatory ordinances. All enforcement officers will be trained in the issuance of citations, as well as investigation, reports preparation and court procedure, in addition to training in methods of animal control and handling procedures. 14. Cruelty Complaints: Respond to and provide resolution to complaints regarding animal cruelty. Whenever evidence of criminal animal cruelty is discovered, such complaints will be coordinated with the appropriate law enforcement agency for further investigation, along with a written report. 15. Activities Not Covered: The Contractor shall not generally be responsible for the following items: a. Responding to complaints or incidents involving wild animals, except, where it is in the interest of public safety that the Contractor respond or the public safety is impaired by the presence of a wild animal, dead or alive, on a public roadway or within the Right-of-Way. b. Rehabilitating and restoring to health animals that have been injured, neglected or abused beyond the basics of shelter, food and water that is not required by State law. Animal Shelter Facilities The Contractor shall provide animal shelter services at the ACA leased facility for all animals for which impounding or quarantine is authorized or ordered by this Agreement, by the Cities or the Benton-Franklin Health District for animals’ subject to the Cities' jurisdiction. These facilities shall be operated and maintained on a 24-hour per-day basis, in a neat, clean and sanitary condition, in compliance with all applicable governmental statutes. ordinances, rules and regulations and in conformity with established standards for humane animal care. 1. Shelter Hours: The Shelter or shelter representative shall be accessible for contact 24 hours per day, seven days a week on an emergency response basis for the purposes of animal control. The animal shelter facility shall be opened to the public, with qualified staff on the Page 51 of 354 premises, on a schedule approved by the ACA. The shelter may be closed on the following Holidays. a. Holiday Schedule i. New Year's Day ii. Memorial Day iii. Independence Day iv. Labor Day v. Veterans Day vi. Thanksgiving Day vii. Christmas Day 2. Delivery of Animals: The Contractor shall provide a procedure whereby animals may be delivered to the shelter on a 24-hour basis. 3. Building: Contractor shall equip and organize the shelter to have an adequate number of dog kennels and cat cages, isolation facilities for sick dogs and cats, quarantine facilities for biters or injured animals which are not necessarily sick, and access to large animal housing. The animal shelter shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and the Contractor will not permit any condition to exist that might constitute a public nuisance. The kennel shall comply with the standards set forth in the Humane Society's Uniform Standards Guidelines (HSUS) for the operation of an animal shelter. The facility site shall be operated in conformance with local zoning regulations and shall comply with all Federal, State and local regulations, 4. Acceptance and Care of Animals: The Contractor shall provide care and treatment to all animals held in custody consistent with industry standards. Adequate housing and food shall be provided, and the shelter shall not be overpopulated. 5. Owner Surrender: The Contractor shall accept “Owner Surrender” of dog(s) and/or cat(s), upon payment of such reasonable cost to be established by the Contractor and reviewed by the ACA, to recover expenses relating to acceptance of such animals. Owner surrenders will be conducted at the main BFHS Facility at 1736 East 7th Avenue Kennewick, WA 6. Reunification: Contractor must make all reasonable attempts to reunite animal with owner before euthanasia or adoption to include accessing current licensing records, using contact information on owner provided tags worn by the animal and scanning all animals to the extent possible to detect implanted computer chips. The owner, if determined, shall be contacted immediately. If contact cannot be established through phone or in person, a written notice shall be sent to the owner’s listed address at least two days prior to a hold being removed. Records of attempts to contact the owner shall be kept. Impounded animals shall be posted on the website and/or any social media outlets utilized within one business day of receipt of the animal. 7. Adoption: The Contractor shall be responsible for making every reasonable effort to prepare and present animals for adoption by the public and to facilitate the same. Page 52 of 354 Unclaimed animals will be made available for claim by ACA approved adoption agencies. The adoption process shall take place as determined by the ACA in consultation with the Contractor. Unclaimed animals are hereby allowed to be maintained by the Contractor at the Animal Shelter Facility at the expense of the Contractor, as long as space remains available for incoming stray animals. Any and all adoption fees for animals after the required hold times are to be retained by the Contactor. 8. Inspection of Premises: The ACA, through its authorized representatives, shall have the right to enter upon and inspect the premises during regular business hours for the purpose of inspecting the facilities for the above-mentioned conditions. 9. Disposal of Unclaimed Animals: The Contractor shall provide for the humane disposal of unclaimed animals after holding them for a minimum hold time as required by applicable City Ordinance, unless documented, sickness or injury requires earlier disposal. Under no circumstances shall animals not adopted be sold for purposes of medical research or other activities without the consent of ACA. Animals that are abandoned or surrendered at the shelter will be held for a minimum period of the hold times that are defined as: dogs 72 hours, cats 24 hours; unless age, sickness, and/or injury requires earlier disposal. Animals that are unable to feed on their own are not required to be held. The Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining animals beyond the minimum time as may be required for the completion of any judicial process or to the extent required by law. Animals held longer than the minimum hold times required by City Ordinance or otherwise stipulated by terms of this contract are at the expense and responsibility of the Contractor. 10. Euthanasia: Arrange and/or provide for the humane euthanasia and disposal of unwanted animals. This shall be accomplished in a manner approved by Federal or State regulations which shall not subject such animals to any unnecessary pain. Euthanasia will be performed in a non-public area and out of sight of visitors to the kennel. Euthanasia will be performed by licensed veterinarian or certified technicians only as provided by State law. 11. Financial Records: The Contractor shall keep comprehensive records and submit regular detail summary reports to accompany invoices to the ACA by the 15th of the following month. All income and expenditures shall be recorded in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The financial records may be subject to audit by any governmental agency, or contractor hired by one of the governmental agencies with jurisdiction at the time and place mutually convenient to the parties during the term and for a period of six (6) years thereafter. Contractor understands that certain records may be subject to State-mandated retention and shall be kept for a minimum of six (6) years. 12. Volunteer Program: The Contractor will encourage community involvement through volunteer opportunities if desired by contractor. Volunteer activities could include pet enrichment activities, office help, transportation to vet appointments, donation pick-ups, Page 53 of 354 adoption events, and cleaning tasks. Any volunteer program is subject to the policies, processes, and procedures established by the Contractor’s organization. 13. Foster Program: The Contractor will manage a Foster Program to help alleviate overcrowding. The Foster Program will benefit dogs and cats that may have behavior challenges, the elderly, sick or recovering from surgery, and puppies and kittens that need 24/7 care. 14. Education: Provide education to the public. Which can include but not limited to: a. Dog bite prevention program b. Public service announcements c. Community outreach – fair booth, license clinics, special events, etc. 15. Website: Update and maintain all facets of the website. Including: a. Lost & Found Pets b. Adopt a New Pet c. Our Pet List d. Foster Program e. Photo Gallery f. Volunteer Opportunities 16. Telephone Number and Name: The shelter telephone number (509) 545-3740, facsimile number (509) 545-9293 and names, "Tri-City Animal Shelter & Control Services” & "Tri- City Animal Shelter" belong to and are owned by the ACA and will remain the property of the ACA upon termination of this contract. Each Member City of the ACA will list the number along with other City services in Agency directory and/or Agency Website. Additional listings in the yellow pages or other directories are the responsibility of the Contractor. 17. Pound Master: The Contractor shall be the Cities' Pound Master(s). 18. Collect Fees: The Contractor shall be responsible for collecting appropriate impounding and boarding fees, according to the Attachment C Fee Schedule, and submitting such fees to the respective Cities monthly. Failure to collect and submit fees can result in ACA withholding service payment until resolved. 19. Licenses: The Contractor shall ensure that all animals released or adopted are properly licensed and vaccinated for rabies in accordance with City ordinances, and shall remit license fees to the Cities. Equipment 1. The Contractor shall be responsible for and obtain all equipment, tools and supplies used in performing the Contractor's obligations arising under this agreement. All equipment, tools & Page 54 of 354 supplies that are donated to the Contractor for use in obligations under this contract, purchased with ACA funds and/or the ACA has furnished or expressly promises to furnish with set-aside funds shall become property of the ACA upon termination of this contract. ACA funds shall include the approved Contractor budget and any set-aside funding. Operating supplies, such as office & cleaning supplies, forms and food are not to be included on the inventory. Contractor shall, upon termination of the contract maintain sufficient and reasonable operating supplies so that an incoming contractor can maintain reasonable service levels without interruption. 2. The Contractor shall have computer chip detection equipment to be able to detect and read computer chips in animals to assist in locating the owner. 3. Animal Transport Equipment: The ACA will provide 3 patrol vehicles under this contract as identified in the vehicle set-aside of the Compensation Schedule. Vehicles purchased with ACA funding will remain the property of the ACA upon termination of this contract. The ACA shall be responsible for licensing and maintaining the ACA patrol vehicles to carry out the enforcement activities of the contract. The patrol vehicles shall have a uniform appearance, be conspicuously marked and identified, equipped with communication equipment and equipped in such a manner as to provide humane treatment for the animals transported. Communication equipment may be provided through handheld radio or cellular phone device upon approval of the ACA. Contractor shall provide documentation of comprehensive, bodily injury, liability and property damage insurance coverage for a minimum limit of $1,000,000 for all vehicles used in performance of this contract. The Contractor will begin the initial term of this contract with the following ACA vehicles: 2014 Ford Transit – VIN# NM0LS6E70E1157980 2015 Ford Transit – VIN# NM0LS6E73F1176699 2007 Ford PU – VIN# 1FTRF12277KC62235 2003 Chevrolet Cargo Van – VIN#1GCHG35U831211943 Other equipment, tools & Supplies that Contractor provides for use in obligations under this agreement that are not purchased with ACA funds shall remain the property of the Contractor. Records and Reports The Contractor shall be required to develop its own record-keeping procedures and to maintain records of all animals it handles in accordance with applicable public records statutes as outlined in the Revised Code of Washington. 1. Reports including but not limited to: a. Number of impounds b. Number of adoptions c. Number of emergency responses d. Disposition of complaints regarding animals e. Dangerous or potentially dangerous animals and dog-bit incidents Page 55 of 354 f. All initiated criminal citations issued g. Any additional information that may be required by a City through its regulatory ordinances h. Number of animals destroyed by euthanasia 2. The Reports shall include the following information: a. description of animal; b. reason it was brought in; c. who brought in the animal; d. from what City the animal was brought in; e. time frame, of when animal brought in, how long it stayed, when released, redeemed, adopted, euthanized; f. fees collected. g. record of all adoptions with names and addresses of new owner; h. record of licenses sold with names and addresses. 3. Failure to Submit: Failure to submit records, reports and/or fees as required in this agreement to the ACA can result in ACA withholding service payment until resolved. The above-required information shall be available to ACA on a monthly basis on approved forms as requested and shall be accessible to the ACA during normal business hours. Fees collected and record of licenses sold including names and addresses shall be delivered to the appropriate City on a monthly basis. Financial and other statistical information shall be provided monthly by the 15th of the following month as required by ACA. The appropriate City shall also receive records of all dangerous or potentially dangerous dog-bite incidents, to the best of the Contractor’s ability. Page 56 of 354 ATTACHMENT B - COMPENSATION SCHEDULE Pro-Rated Budget Benton Franklin Humane Society Initial Budget Medical/Vet Supplies $77.41 Prescriptions $22,770.04 Lab and Testing Outsourced Vet Fees or In-House Vet Salary $202,801.66 Total $225,649.11 Animal Care Kennel Supplies $88,535.34 Dog and puppy food $16,892.60 cat and kitten food $4,029.87 Litter $10,355.22 Small Animal Supplies and Feed $82.65 Medical Supplies $17,413.04 Rabies Vax $701.20 Dog vax & Bordetella $9,922.18 Cat Vax $6,857.67 Parasiticides $16,141.95 SNAP tests $2,583.15 Microchips $1,664.00 Leashes and Collars $3,751.39 ID Tags $1,432.28 Prescription Drugs $8,142.90 Foster Care Supplies $350.93 Medicated Shampoo $2,583.15 Total $191,439.53 Bldg Maint Repair & Maint (Bldg) $4,133.04 Repair & Maint (Equip) $1,394.90 HVAC Maint $1,549.89 Total $7,077.83 Vehicle Fees Insurance $11,365.86 General Maintenance $7,232.82 Gas $9,299.34 Page 57 of 354 Registration $536.27 Total $28,434.29 Property and Business Tax $6,941.33 General Liability Insurance $9,505.99 Professional Fees CPA Firm (audits every 2nd year) $4,596.46 Answering Service $14,465.64 Other Prof. Fees $4,590.91 Payroll Service (timesheets) $1,885.16 Bank Fee $1,037.94 Merchant Processing $251.87 TOTAL $26,827.98 Utilities Electricity Covered by ACA Water/Sewer Covered by ACA Gas Garbage $6,199.56 Business Phone/Internet $8,740.16 Cellular Service $13,949.01 Equipment Rental $82.32 Security System $5,698.53 Hazardous Waste Disposal $545.33 Grounds Maintenance/Lnsc Covered by ACA Total $35,214.92 Direct Mail $0.00 Salaries and Insurance Group Insurance/Benefits $77,494.50 Payroll Tax $57,528.76 Salaries and Wages $ 844,800.00 Total $979,823.26 Special Events and Fundraising $0.00 Administration Shelter Buddy Software $9483.19 Returned Checks $40.00 Volunteer Recognitions $0.00 Office Supplies $2,789.80 Printing $2,789.80 Page 58 of 354 Copier $3,325,54 Comp Repairs/Phone Maint $3,099.78 Safety/First Aid Supplies/CPR $3,030.97 Dues and Subscriptions $5,294.55 Travel, Conference, Training, $3,616.41 Meals and Trans $325.48 Uniforms $3,214.24 Janitorial Supplies $2,583.15 Employee Recognition $398.37 Business Cards $332.80 Total $36,998.54 Operating Expense Bank Service Charge $309.98 Merchant Processing $9,299.34 Office Expense $0.00 Total $12,871.88 Grand Total $1,512,865.21 Pro Rated Monthly Fee $126,072.10 Monthly Rate per ACA Member $42,024.03 Page 59 of 354 ATTACHMENT C - FEE SCHEDULE Fees/Hold Times/Dangerous Dog Kennewick Pasco Richland Penalty (Citation) First Offense $50.00 $50.00 $30.00 Second Offense $100.00 $100.00 $50.00 Third Offense $200.00 $200.00 $75.00 Four or more $400.00 $400.00 $100.00 Annual License Fees Unaltered Cats and Dogs $0.00 $45.00 $45.00 Altered Cats and Dogs $0.00 $10.00 $10.00 Dangerous or Wild Animal Permit $250.00 $250.00 $250.00 Impound Fee First $10.00 $35.00 $35.00 Second $50.00 $50.00 $35.00 Three or More $100.00 $100.00 $35.00 Hourly time for animals Cats w/o License 24 48 72 Cats w/ License and Dogs 72 72 72 10-day Temporary License Yes Yes Yes Page 60 of 354 ATTACHMENT D – ADDITIONAL FEES/COSTS RE EMERGENCY TAKEOVER FEES Emergency Contract Addt’l Fees $1,500 p/week, billable monthly, until contract is terminated or long-term contracted is executed Paid by ACA to BFHS. Cat Kennel Replacement Replacement of dangerous, unhealthy cat kennels in TCAS shelter facility to meet standards of care Paid for by ACA, asset belongs to ACA as part of long-term fixed asset inventory. Quote sent by BFHS for kennels meeting standards of care. Puppy Room Drain Cleaning and Disinfectant Remove animal waste, clean, and disinfect drains in puppy/small dog rooms until safe for human and animal occupancy Work paid for and performed by ACA or their separate 3rd party contractors. Room remains out of operation until this item is complete and may interfere with ability to provide services to community due to limit in space. Building Code Upgrade Bring the facility up to building code with the installation of fire suppression systems and smoke/fire detection systems, rodent control, etc. Work paid for and performed by ACA or their separate 3rd party contractors. IT System Upgrade Bring the IT system up to usable levels so staff can perform work at an acceptable level expected of any business. BFHS is able to provide a quote for this items required. Reimbursement by ACA for labor and items vs payment and services provided by ACA and/or their own staff/3rd party contractor shall be agreed upon prior to contract signing. Page 61 of 354 ATTACHMENT E – FULL SHELTER STAFFING LEVEL REQUIREMENTS PER ASV GUIDELINES Position Hourly Wage Current Wage Employer Paid Benefits? Notes ACO Supervisor $ 28.85 $ 60,000.00 Yes Med/Den benefits paid ACO Officer 1 $ 20.67 $ 43,000.00 Yes - Partial Pd $100 towards med/den benefits paid by EE each mo ACO Officer 2 $ 20.19 20.19 $ 42,000.00 Yes - Partial Pd $100 towards med/den benefits paid by EE each mo ACO Officer 3 $ 20.19 $ 42,000.00 Yes - Partial Pd $100 towards med/den benefits paid by EE each mo ACO Officer 4 $ 20.19 $ 42,000.00 Yes - Partial Pd $100 towards med/den benefits paid by EE each mo Executive Director $45.69 $ 47,520.00 Yes Med/Den benefits paid - *1/2 salary as they will coordinate between both programs Executive Assistant $ 21.63 $ 22,500.00 Yes Med/Den benefits paid - *1/2 salary as they will coordinate between both programs Finance Manager/Business Office Manager $ 33.65 $35,000.00 No *1/2 salary as they will coordinate between both programs Shelter Operations Manager $ 22.60 $ 23,500.00 Yes *1/2 salary as they will coordinate between both programs Shelter Operations Team Lead $ 16.25 $ 33,800.00 No Admissions Coordinator $ 16. 75 $ 34,480.00 No Foster Coordinator $ 16.83 $ 17,500.00 No *1/2 salary as they will coordinate between both programs Volunteer Coordinator $ 21.15 $ 22,000.00 No *1/2 salary as they will coordinate between both programs Front Desk - FT $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Front Desk - FT $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Front Desk - FT $ 15.00 $ 22,500.00 No Part-time Staff Member Page 62 of 354 Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 22,500.00 No Part-time Staff Member Animal Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 22,500.00 No Part-time Staff Member Shelter Care Aide $ 15.00 $ 31,200.00 No TOTAL $ 844,800.00 Page 63 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 15, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Adam Lincoln, Deputy City Manager Executive SUBJECT: Tourism Promotion Area Reserve Fund Request I. REFERENCE(S): Letter from Visit Tri-Cities dated March 20, 2022 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve the 2022 Special Project Expenditures for the Tourism Promotion Area in the amount of $428,800 to be funded from the TPA Reserve Balance. III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The TPA was formed in late 2004 to generate and administer the proceeds of a "per room night assessment" on hotels/motels in the Tri-Cities, imposed by the hotels themselves. The interlocal agreement (between Pasco, Kennewick and Richland) creating the TPA requires the annual budget, and any expenditures from the TPA reserve account, to first be approved by the City Councils. V. DISCUSSION: The TPA "assessment" is remitted by the hotels to the State which, in turn, distributes it to the City in which it was collected. The City is obligated to pass the funds to the TPA for use, in accordance with the approved budget. Page 64 of 354 The TPA Commission has voted unanimously to request the transfer of an additional $428,800 for special project expenditures for 2022 from the reserve account for the following: • Playeasy Platform - $10,000 • Convention Sales Manager - $80,000 • Olympia Sales Blitz hotel rooms for Hospitality Partners - $3,000 • Meeting Planner FAM - $20,000 • Photo & Video Production - $100,000 • Seattle Out of Home Advertising - $100,000 • Creative Testing Consumer Research - $27,800 • TBEX FAM - $5,000 • TREAD MAP App - $60,000 • Tourism Recovery Education - $18,000 • Security for Visit Tri-Cities Office (Access Control) - $5,000 At the March 14th Council Workshop, Michael Novakovich, President and CEO of Visit Tri-Cities presented the 2021 annual report for the prior year, an outline of the current year work plan, as well as a request for approval to spend from the Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) Reserve Account. Staff recommends approval of the TPA Reserve request. Page 65 of 354 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd., Suite B Kennewick, WA 99336 509-735-8486 1-800-254-5824 www.VisitTRI-CITIES.com info@VisitTRI-CITIES.com March 2, 2022 Mr. Dave Zabell City of Pasco P.O. Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 Dear Mr. Zabell: Thank you for the opportunity to present the Visit Tri-Cities 2021 Annual Report, 2022 Work Plan and to make a request to utilize Tourism Promotion Area reserve funds to the Pasco City Council on Monday, March 14, 2022. On behalf of the Tri-City Regional Hotel-Motel Commission, Visit Tri-Cities would like to request the transfer of $428,800 from Tourism Promotion Area Reserve Account to be used for supplemental tourism related projects. We prepare the Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) budget in July of each year for the following calendar year. As is the case with most every budget process, there are always more worthy projects to be considered than funds to support them. We manage our resources carefully to ensure our expenses never exceed our projected income and we budget conservatively. As a result, the TPA Commissioners have identified $575,665 in funds available for reinvestment in tourism related projects. The funds available for project investment are in addition to the minimum reserve requirement of $500,000, the amount set based on the recommendation of the City Managers who participate in at Commission meetings as Ex- Officios. It is the Commission’s position that once the reserve account reaches this level, that any additional funds should actively be used to promote the Tri Cities as a destination; creating increased visitor spending in the community. In addition to this capital investments are often included in reserve requests. The projects under consideration accomplish these goals. Given that the balance of the Tourism Promotion Area Reserve Account exceeds the level of $500,000; the Commissioners of the Tri-City Regional Hotel-Motel Commission have voted in favor of re-investing the surplus revenues, in the amount of $428,800 that will help tourism related projects including digital advertising campaigns, online platforms, staffing and promotions to increase leisure travel stays and secure new conventions and sports tournaments, high-end photo and video production, destination brand research, tourism education and control security. A summary of the projects and the associated expenditures is attached for your review. Again, thank you for your consideration and support of the tourism industry. I am available for any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, Michael Novakovich, CDME President and CEO Enclosure Page 66 of 354 2022 Proposed TPA Reserve Reinvestments Playeasy Platform $10,000 Playeasy is a networking and lead generation platform with the largest online network of sports destinations and athletic facilities in the United States. This tool enables event organizers, sports facilities and destinations to create profiles and streamline the ability to search, find, communicate, post events and connect through one seamless platform. The platform would provide access to approximately 400 event holders within the RFP Marketplace to support our on-going sports development efforts. Advertising opportunities are available within the platform. Convention Sales Manager $80,000 Adding an additional Sales Manager will amplify our efforts to increase group room nights for the community. The Convention Sales Manager will be the primary contact for the Government and Corporate Group Market Segment. The individual will also be responsible for researching and pursuing new market opportunities for the Tri-Cities as well as reviving the Show Your Badge program. We are forecasting an additional 7,000 group room nights and fifty leads to be generated in the first twelve months of employment. We expect the individual to have a start date of May 1st. This request covers employee costs for the twelve-month period (salary, benefits, etc.,). Olympia Sales Blitz hotel rooms for Hospitality Partners $3,000 To help ease travel budget concerns caused by the pandemic, Visit Tri-Cities will cover the cost of two night’s lodging for one representative from each participating hotel property or meeting venue to attend the 2022 Spring Sales Blitz in Olympia. All other costs including travel to and from Olympia and meals will be the responsibility of each participant. The requested amount will cover costs for up to ten partners. Meeting Planner FAM $20,000 The Convention Department will host an in-person Familiarization (FAM) Tour in the Tri-Cities for up to fifteen qualified meeting planners in September. Qualified planners will be invited to apply. Selections will be made based on the following criteria: 1) New Business i.e., events that are new to the Tri-Cities or have not taken place for more than five years; 2) Business taking place in shoulder season; and/or 3) Business large enough to impact multiple lodging facilities. Photo & Video Production $100,000 Engage with a high-end photo and video production company to create compelling visual content for creative storytelling rivaling tier one global destination content. Deliverables would include cinema quality longform videos (2+ minutes); :30 and :15 distribution ready commercials; a gallery of photos for promotional purposes and made available for stakeholder and media usage. The casting and experiences featured will be diverse and inclusive. The products will supplement the robust video content VTC staff is currently producing in-house on a weekly basis. Page 67 of 354 Seattle Out of Home Advertising $100,000 For this campaign, Visit Tri-Cities will focus advertising efforts on our primary drive-in markets, particularly Seattle, to attract visitors to the Tri-Cities through multiple and repeated touchpoints. In addition to broadcast, streaming, digital, social and print tactics already in place for the year, the supplemental budget will support out of home advertising tactics in the Seattle, including but not limited to, billboards, transportation and wallscapes. Creative Testing Consumer Research $27,800 Visit Tri-Cities would contract with Destination Analysts to provide follow-up to the Consumer Sentiment Study recently completed for Visit Tri-Cities. Creative Testing Research would be conducted twice a year on our ongoing marketing campaigns. This would include measuring favorability, engagement of creative and desire to take action, as well as awareness and understanding of the Tri-Cities through in-depth interviews. TBEX FAM $5,000 The Tri-Cities will be hosting TBEX North America, April 18-21, where nearly 300 travel content creators will spend four days exploring the region. Above and beyond the conference program, Visit Tri-Cities will host a FAM tour of up to five travel writers, specifically selected by VTC, to enjoy an immersive experience of our rivers, restaurants, wine and other attractions to develop storytelling content. The FAM will include an exploration of Downtown Kennewick and the Public Market at Columbia Warehouse, a horse drawn wagon ride and luxury picnic on Red Mountain, a progressive experience in Richland gathering places The Parkway and Uptown Shopping Center, a mini taco crawl in Downtown Pasco, a welcome amenity featuring VTC logo’d travel item (e.g. crossbody bag or backpack) featuring local items and more. TREAD MAP App $60,000 Outdoor recreation has been a key asset bringing about the return of the tourism economy. Recognizing the multi-faceted value of outdoor recreation, the State of Washington Tourism in partnership with Dharma Maps created TREAD Map. The expense to develop TREAD is $30,000 each per county for Benton and Franklin counties. The State of Washington Tourism is offering $30,000 match per county to aid in the development of a statewide tool used to draw visitors to our community while engaging sustainable tourism and stewardship of our open spaces. TREAD Map is a hyper-local trail mapping app built by trail enthusiasts who understand what users want to know: •Plan outings •Access and provide real-time trail conditions •Post-trip reports, photos, and videos •Share local experiences •Connect with other trail enthusiasts •Engage in two-way communication with land managers •Learn more about local events, fundraisers, work parties and advocacy groups •Get exclusive deals from sponsors Page 68 of 354 Tourism Recovery Education $18,000 Destinations International, DMA West and other industry associations are hosting several in- person summits, conferences and events that focus on tourism recovery education and initiatives. These events target two key segments of our business: group business (meetings, conventions, and sports) and leisure travel. Funding of tourism recovery education provides additional opportunities for the Visit Tri-Cities senior staff to learn new tactics, strategies, and best practices from presenters as well as in-valuable peer-to-peer exchanges with the intent of driving an expedited return of our local tourism economy. Security for Visit Tri-Cities Office (Access Control) $5,000 A controlled access and security system for Visit Tri-Cities office is a vital component to further protect the organization’s significant investments in technology and equipment and enhance the level of security and safety for employees. Such a system will grant people access for specific days and times based upon their job requirements. It provides added security measures and tracks who enters the office. The need to re-key locks after turnover or lost keys will be eliminated resulting in cost savings in the future. Additional cost savings may be recognized through an associated reduction in insurance premiums. Total All Requests: $428,800 Page 69 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 16, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Appeal of Garcia Latecomer for Watermain Installation I. REFERENCE(S): Letter from Attorney Orosco Preliminary Latecomer Benefiting Property Calculations Preliminary Latecomer Benefiting Property Map Proposed Assessment Reimbursement Area Drawing - Harms Engineering II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Review/Consideration III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A domestic watermain meeting the standards of the City of Pasco was installed in West Dradie Street from Road 48 to the west by the property owner of Parcel No. 119052269. As part of this installation this same owner sought to recover some of the costs to extend this watermain past other properties that benefited from its availability through the Developer Reimbursement Agreement (Latecomers) process in PMC 14.25. The Latecomers application established that a "frontage" approach for assigning benefit was the best method and did so through the provided documentation. It is important to note that the benefit is not a connection and the two terms, although related, are different. Frontage benefit closely follows the requirements of properties to extend all utilities to-and-through as described within the City of Page 70 of 354 Pasco Concurrency requirements. A cost for each property is then determined by the cost to install the improvement and divided by the total frontage for which that improvement fronts. In this case Parcel No. 119051128 has 160.10' fronting the improvement resulting in a cost of $7,809.21. As a reference the parcel immediately same the has 119051129 exactly Parcel this of east No. assessment because the frontage associated with this improvement has the same dimension of 160.10'. V. DISCUSSION: to preliminary the appeal wishes Parcel No. of owner The 119051128 assessment reimbursement area and the assessment amount. It is important to understand that should the current or future parcel owner(s) not further make improvements to their parcel necessitating the need for this improvement or, because this improvement is a domestic watermain extension, need use of domestic water, they will not be charged for this improvement. It is also important to understand a that this latecomers agreement, once recorded, has predetermined length of effect which is determined to be 15 years. Page 71 of 354 Trinit Orosco Attorney at Law September 29,2021 City of Pasco Community and Economic Development Engineering -Development P.O.Box 293 Pasco,WA 99301 RE:.Preliminary Determination for Parcel No.1 19051 128 To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to serve as our of?cial notice of our objection to the imposition of reimbursement costs for the construction of a water line in our neighborhood. Prior to the scheduling of a hearing,we request the following information: 1. 2. 3. Formula used by the City to detennine the percentage attributable to our property Whether the future subdivision of neighboring parcels was included in the calculation of the assessment Actual amount paid -bythe City of Pasco for the water line installation a.Amount paid by the City of Pasco for reimbursement of the installation of the water line b.Non-reimbursableamount paid by the neighboring parcels Contract between the City and the developer/residents for the installation of the water line,including amount approved for reimbursement Whether the amount of $7,809.21 is the full cost of future connection;or,if that amount is in addition to a future connection cost a.i.e.is the $7,809.21 a portion of the construction costs or the future connection fee? Thank you for time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, ©tXU‘sU~9TrinityOrosco Attorney at Law CCI File 1030 North Center Parkway Kennewick,Washington99336 Phone:509.492.6225 Facsimile:509.222.2223 Page 72 of 354 I I Cityof '-11� Pasco Garcia -W. Draidie St Latecomer's Agreement Improvement: 6" -8" Water -Draidie St Build Length (LF): 692.00 Add Length (LF) City Adm. Costs $ Cost of Improvement: $61,633.64 Parcel #, Owner 119052269, Garcia (Developer) 119052270, Kysar 119051129, Hollingsworth 119051128, Cantu 119051099,Johnson TOTAL Benefitting Parcels Frontage (ft) Total Benefit Distr. % 200.20 15.6% 440.10 34.4% 160.10 12.5% 160.10 12.5% 320.30 25.0% 1280.8 100.0% 48.00 840.00 Total Benefit Dist.$ $9,765.16 $21,466.78 $7,809.21 $7,809.21 $15,623.29 $62,473.64 Note: If there is additional length of utility indicated above (i.e .. for connection to the existing utility), this assessment will include that length of utility that does not front any property. Because front footage is the method used for assessment that additional length is distributed based upon percentage of frontage. Page 73 of 354 .85pmllIIIIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIIII W ST 67 5' W AT ER LINE \ ASSE SSME NT AREA NEW LINE ——EXIST ING WA TE R LINE PROJEC T: GARCIALATECOMERS FILENAME:GARCIA,JORGE. 1SCALE ‘DATE:9-17-19 PROPERTY PROPERTY OWNER ACRES P A R C E L DRAWNBY:DYNUMBERN U M BE R APPROV ED BY- 1 VANESA GARCIA 1.35 119 052 269 REV.DESCRIPTION 2 CHRISTOPHER HLLINGSWWORTH 1.03 119 051 129 A8"WATERLINE 3 RAMIRO &MARGARI'|'A CANTU 1.03 119 051 1284COLBY&CARENJOHNSON 2.07 119 051 0995JEREMYJONIKYSAR0.99 119 052 270 D E V E L O P E R BENEFITAREA Cit yvfPage 74 of 354 PROPOSED ASSESSMENT REIMBURSEMENT 0NNENw1;»TOWNSHIP [=3 RANGE W.M'l.NK N N WASHINGTONIICINITYMAPf5J1 ROADIE A1! $111111‘L113VICINITYMAPIMIAGEOBTAINEDGO0GLEE4RTH,AUGUST2019 PA S C O, FRA _J L '_.-..JW DRADIEST’ PORTIOor‘A.or'‘A.orsscnow23,9vonru,29EAST,L!Lcourrv, KYSAR 119052270 [4720] GUZMAN119052252[2813]RAMOS119052245[2805] JOHNS ON119051 099[2913 ] 1 0 0 50 a..!.siau..a.:_E.s__§...éaomi=§~.._a¥§iameast.E§:?sa.s2:=_.:iz.mzo..&un=<n§sEuSo><.§.o:mi5...n.__s.9_.$._a=mEa=_2u~.=....§saw<2.83;..$.5_..._§,_»m,>~$F.2_._mz.mmmz_oz38anEgg:,Hnm§NII!uus.¢::In.SEE§.88<3.OUm<LFmmD3Ev39..«am.1<_u¢<omecca.=a<9Eo5<mBm_n<E B§.__:.._asu..e§.aB(W11...zms_mmE..n_z_m¢._.zms_umuam<nuao..o¢..ZOEZWPXWW2:EMF‘;PMu.n<¢nSEW 09-05-201 9WMWW19-115.1Sheel?umberEX1 CANT U HOLLINGSWORTH 119051 128 119051129 [4617][4609] 9LF6'DIWATER 692LF8'D1WATER 36LF6'DIWATER GARCIA 119052269 SP2a1_-_LOT1 DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY GARCIA 119052269 SP2o1_-__LOT2 DEVELOPER ‘SPROPERTY P L A N SC AL E PRO POS ED RE IM B U RS E M E N T AREA -R0 D A S S E S S M E PROPO‘ASSESSMENTREIMBURSEMAREARDWDV .Page 75 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 16, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Ordinance - Olberding & Farm 2005 LLC (ANX 2021-003) I. REFERENCE(S): Amended Ordinance No. 4574A Original Ordinance No. 4574 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No. 4574A, which repeals and amends Ordinance No. 4574, annexing certain real property to the City of Pasco, and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On January 24 2022, Council approved Ordinance No. 4574, annexing the Olberding & Farm 2005 LLC areas into the City of Pasco. On February 28, 2021, it was discovered that the legal description contained in Ordinance No. 4574 contained an error. The attached Ordinance No. 4574A amends the legal description for Ordinance No. 4574. V. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance No. 4574A, which repeals and amends Ordinance No. 4574 annexing the Olberding & Farm 2005 LLC areas into the City of Pasco. Page 76 of 354 Page 77 of 354 Ordinance – Olberding & Farm 2005 Annexation Amended Legal Description (ANX 2021-003) - 1 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: City of Pasco, Washington WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco, Washington Attn: City Clerk 525 North 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDINANCE NO. 4574A AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ANNEXATION AND ANNEXING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF PASCO. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco received a petition application completed by Olberding and Farm 2005, owners of no less than ten (10) percent of certain property, meeting the requirements of RCW 35A.14.120 on May 28, 2021; and WHEREAS, a public meeting on the proposed annexation application was held on July 19, 2021, wherein City Council passed Resolution No. 4079, accepting the intent to annex and determining the property to be annexed as set forth in Section 1 below (Property), requiring the assumption of all proportionate and existing bonded indebtedness, and not requiring a simultaneous zoning designation; and WHEREAS, the City received a petition signed by not less than sixty (60) percent owners of the Property; and WHEREAS, the petition meets the requirements of RCW 35A.01.040 and has been certified to be sufficient by the Franklin County Assessor on January 13, 2022; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on the proposed annexation has been published and posted as required by law; and. WHEREAS, on January 24, 2022, a public hearing on the annexation was held and the City Council passed Ordinance No. 4574 which annexed certain property within the City of Pasco; and WHEREAS, it was subsequently determined that Ordinance No. 4574 contained a drafting error; and Page 78 of 354 Ordinance – Olberding & Farm 2005 Annexation Amended Legal Description (ANX 2021-003) - 2 WHEREAS, the City wishes to correct the error in the legal description via amended Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the proposal is consistent with the Franklin County Comprehensive Plan, and annexation of the property is found to be in the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following described area, situated in Franklin County, Washington to- wit: Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcels Nos. 114330031, 114330044, 114330042, 114330041, 114330043, 114330047, 114330046, 114330045, 114330048 and a portion of parcel 114250016, as described below: That portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 and portions of Section 3, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 3; Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 3 to the Southwest corner of said Section 2; Thence North 89°08’34” East along the South line of said Section 2 a distance of 2317.23 feet to the Southwest corner of that Exception Parcel described in Avigation Easement recorded under Auditor’s file number 1952536, records of Franklin County, Washington; Thence North 45°15’38” West along the West line of said Exception Parcel 1177.05 feet to the most westerly corner thereof; Thence North 44°44’22” East 1500.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Exception Parcel; Thence South 45°15’38” East 217.15 feet to the East line of said Southwest Quarter of said Section 2; Thence Northerly along the East line of said Southwest corner to the Northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter; Thence Westerly along the North line of said Southwest Quarter to the Northwest corner thereof also being the East Quarter corner of said Section 3; Thence South 89°40’16” West along the North line of Parcel C of that Record of Survey recorded in Volume 3 of Survey, Page 649, records of Franklin County, Washington, 1127.58 feet; Thence North 89°02’15” West along said North line 610.26 feet; Thence South 88°49’09” West 925.06 feet to the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 3 said point being coincident with the Southeast corner of Parcel “B” of that Short Plat recorded in Book 2 of Short Plats, Page 386, records of Franklin County, Washington; Thence Northerly along the East line of said Parcel “B” to the Northeast corner of said Parcel “B”, said point being on the Southerly right of way line of Clark Road; Thence Westerly along the North line of said Parcel “B” and the Southerly right of way line of Clark Road to the most Easterly corner of Parcel “A” of said Short Plat; Thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of said Parcel “A” to the most Southerly corner of said Parcel “A”, said point being on the west line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 3; Thence Southerly along the Page 79 of 354 Ordinance – Olberding & Farm 2005 Annexation Amended Legal Description (ANX 2021-003) - 3 Westerly line of said Parcel “B” to the Southwest corner of said Parcel “B”, Thence Southerly along said Westerly line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 3 to the Point of Beginning. Situated in Franklin County, State of Washington; comprising approximately 617.19 Acres Together with and subject to Easements, Reservations, Covenants, and Restrictions, of record and in View, as depicted in the map attached hereto and labeled Exhibit A and the same is hereby annexed to the City of Pasco and is hereby declared to be within the corporate limits of the City of Pasco. Section 2. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Pasco be and the same is hereby adopted for the above-described tract of land. Section 3. That said tract of land shall be required to assume all proportionate and existing bonded indebtedness of the City of Pasco. Section 4. That said tract of land shall be in Voting District No. 3. Section 5. That a certified copy of this Ordinance be and the same shall be filed with the Franklin County Commissioners. Section 6. If any portion of this Ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion(s) of the Ordinance. Section 7. This Ordinance shall repeal and replace Ordinance No. 4574. Section 8. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. Page 80 of 354 Ordinance – Olberding & Farm 2005 Annexation Amended Legal Description (ANX 2021-003) - 4 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ___ day of March, 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Published: ________________________ Page 81 of 354 CITY LIMITS CITY LIMITS ROAD 68SANDIFUR P KW YROAD 68 NCLARK RD BURNS RDTAYLOR FLATS RDZ o n e 4 Z o n e 1 Z o n e 2 Z o n e 2 Zo n e 2 Zone 3 Zone 3Zone 5Zone 5 114250016 114330031 114330044 114330042114330041 114330043114330047 114330046114330045 114330048 Urban Growth Boundary Urban Growth Boundary Urban Growth Bounda r y 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500 Feet "Exhibit A" Item: Olberding & Farm 2005 Annexation Applicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding & Steve West/Farm 2005 File #: ANX 2021-003 ANX 2021-003 City Option 01 City Limits UGA 2021 COP.SDE.Airport_Clear_Zone Layer Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 Zone 6Page 82 of 354 FRANKLIN COUNTY RECORDING COVER SHEET NAME AND RETURN ADDRESS: City of Pasco 525 N. Third Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 AFN # 1955216 ORDIN 01/26/2022 01:45 PM 5 Page(s) $207.50 Matt Beaton, Auditor Franklin Co .. WA FORM COMPLETED BY: Krystle Shanks PHONE # (509) 544-3096--------------PL EASE PRINT OR TYPE INFORMATION: DOCUMENT TITLE(S) (or transaction contained therein) 1.Ordinance No. 4574 2.ANX2021-003 3. GRANTOR(S) (Last name, first name, middle name/initials): 1.Citv of Pasco 2. 3. 4.D Additional names on page of document GRANTEE(S) (Last name, first name, middle name/initials): 1.Allen & Cheryl Olberding2.Steve West 3.Farm 20054.D Additional names on page of document LEGAL DESCRIPTION (Abbreviated: ie.lot, block, plat or section, township, range) SW Quarter of Section 2 and Section 3, Township 9 North, Range 29 E, W.M. [Z] Additional legal is on page 2 of document AUDITOR'S REFERENCE NUMBER(S) ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL NUMBER 114-330-041D Additional parcel numbers on page of document The Auditor/Recorder will rely on the information provided on this form. The staff will not read the document to verify the accuracy or completeness of the indexing information EMERGENCY NONSTANDARD REQUEST I am requesting an emergency nonstandard recording for an additional fee of $50.00 as provided in RCW 36.18.010. I understand that the recording processing requirements may cover up or otherwise obscure some part of the text of the original document. Signature Date Page 83 of 354 Page 84 of 354 Page 85 of 354 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this 24th day of January, 202 � / 0. Am�arnn�ctmte�fi�m�aj�·a-s-r�•? 'fV\.�l�A�1 Mayor Pre-·h /V\ATTEST: �c6od---Debra Barham, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Ordinance -Olberding & Farm 2005 Annexation (ANX 2021-003) - 3 Page 86 of 354 Ur-ban Growth BetJndar-y-=-������= GARK RI)--- ANX 2021-003 Oty Option 01 CtyUmits UGA 2021 COP.SOE.Airport_ aear _Zone Layer r Zone 1 Page 87 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 18, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Q Ordinance - Olberding & Farm 2005 LLC (ZD 2021-003) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Zoning Ordinance Overview Map Hearing Examiner Report II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. _____, assigning zoning to the Olberding & Farm 2005 annexation area as recommended by the Hearing Examiner, and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On January 24, 2022, Council approved Ordinance No. 4574 incorporating the Olberding & Farm 2005 LLC annexation area into the City. On March 21, 2022, Council approved Ordinance No. 4574A repealing and amending Ordinance No. 4574 incorporating the Olberd ing & Farm 2005 LLC annexation area into the City. On December 8, 2021, and February 9, 2022, the Hearing Examiner held a hearing to consider C-1 (Retail Business), R-1 (Low-Density Residential), and R-3 (Medium-Density Residential) zoning as depicted on the proposed zoning map (“Exhibit B”) for the Olberding & Farm 2005 LLC annexation area, in conjunction with the annexation. Page 88 of 354 Following the conduct of a hearing the Hearing Examiner recommended the City Council approve C-1, R-1, and R-3 zoning for the annexation area petition. V. DISCUSSION: The Hearing Examiner conducted a zoning determination hearing for the proposed annexation area on December 8, 2021, which was continued to the February 9, 2022 hearing date. Staff has made a recommendation to the Hearing Examiner of C-1, R-1 and R-3 zoning for the annexation area, in alignment with the City's recently adopted Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. A portion of Parcel No. 114250016 is located within the Airport overlay zone; specifically a Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 obstruction identification surface (OIS) Zone 4 – Outer Approach/Departure Zone. Allowable density within this overlay zone is limited to the density prescribed by the R-S-20 Zoning District (20,000-square-foot-lots). It has been determined by the Director of Community & Economic Development, in consultation with the City Attorneys, that this parcel may be zoned R -1 if the density within the aforementioned (OIS) Zone 4 does not exceed RS -20 density. Applicants may be able to reallocate density within the area using a Planned - Unit Development (PUD) strategy to achieve average R-1 density throughout the development area. Page 89 of 354 Ordinance-- Olberding & Farm 2005 ZD 2021-003 - 1 ORDINANCE NO. _________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, ASSIGNING ZONING TO THE OLBERDING & FARM 2005 ANNEXATION AREA, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. WHEREAS, on December 8, 2021, January 12, 2022, and February 9, 2022, pursuant to PMC 25.220.020, the Hearing Examiner of the City of Pasco conducted a public hearing to develop a recommendation for the assignment of zoning to certain property, as set forth in Section 1 below (Property), in the event the property was incorporated within the City; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner also recommended approval of the proposed zoning designation after concluding, pursuant to PMC 25.210.060, that the proposal: (a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; (b) is not materially detrimental to the immediate vicinity; (c) has merit and value for the community as a whole; (d) does not require conditions or mitigation measures; and (e) does not require a concomitant agreement; and Council hereby adopts the Hearing Examiner’s findings, conclusions and recommendation as depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto; and WHEREAS, on March 21, 2022, Ordinance No. 4574A effectively annexed the Property to the City of Pasco. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following described area, situated in Franklin County, Washington to- wit: Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcels Nos. 114330031, 114330044, 114330042, 114330041, 114330043, 114330047, 114330046, 114330045, 114330048 and a portion of parcel 114250016, as described below: That portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 and portions of Section 3, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 3; Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 3 to the Southwest corner of said Section 2; Thence North 89°08’34” East along the South line of said Section 2 a distance of 2317.23 feet to the Southwest corner of that Exception Parcel described in Avigation Easement recorded under Auditor’s file number 1952536, records of Franklin County, Washington; Thence North 45°15’38” West along the West line of said Exception Parcel 1177.05 feet to the most westerly corner thereof; Thence North 44°44’22” East 1500.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Exception Parcel; Thence South 45°15’38” East 217.15 feet to the East line of said Southwest Quarter of said Section 2; Thence Northerly along the East line of said Page 90 of 354 Ordinance-- Olberding & Farm 2005 ZD 2021-003 - 2 Southwest corner to the Northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter; Thence Westerly along the North line of said Southwest Quarter to the Northwest corner thereof also being the East Quarter corner of said Section 3; Thence South 89°40’16” West along the North line of Parcel C of that Record of Survey recorded in Volume 3 of Survey, Page 649, records of Franklin County, Washington, 1127.58 feet; Thence North 89°02’15” West along said North line 610.26 feet; Thence South 88°49’09” West 925.06 feet to the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 3 said point being coincident with the Southeast corner of Parcel “B” of that Short Plat recorded in Book 2 of Short Plats, Page 386, records of Franklin County, Washington; Thence Northerly along the East line of said Parcel “B” to the Northeast corner of said Parcel “B”, said point being on the Southerly right of way line of Clark Road; Thence Westerly along the North line of said Parcel “B” and the Southerly right of way line of Clark Road to the most Easterly corner of Parcel “A” of said Short Plat; Thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of said Parcel “A” to the most Southerly corner of said Parcel “A”, said point being on the west line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 3; Thence Southerly along the Westerly line of said Parcel “B” to the Southwest corner of said Parcel “B”, Thence Southerly along said Westerly line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 3 to the Point of Beginning. Situated in Franklin County, State of Washington; comprising approximately 617.19 Acres. Together with and subject to Easements, Reservations, Covenants, and Restrictions, of record and in View, as depicted in the map attached hereto and labeled Exhibit B, be and the same is hereby assigned zoning as follows: 1. C-1 (Retail Business): The south 467.08 feet of Parcel 114330048; 2. R-1 (Low-Density Residential): The north 798.12 feet of parcels 114330043 and 114330044, and Parcels No. 114330031, 114330042, 114330041, 114330047, 114330046, 114330045, and a portion of parcel 114250016; 3. R-3 (Medium-Density Residential): The north 885.4 feet of Parcel 114330048 and the south 543.7 feet of Parcels Nos. 114330043 and 114330044; and Section 2. That any and all zoning maps be and the same are hereby amended to conform to the aforesaid assignment of zoning. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. Page 91 of 354 Ordinance-- Olberding & Farm 2005 ZD 2021-003 - 3 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this _______ day of ____________________, 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Published: ____________________________ Page 92 of 354 20THDENT STEA RMAN COURT HILLSBORO WERNETTROAD68 ROAD 444T HROAD 5214THI N D USTRIALPEARL 5THBURDE N 4THBROADMOORARGEN T SANDIFUR ROAD 84KAR TCHNER ROAD 100I-182 RAIL R OA DROAD 36BUR NS US 395I-1 82 US 395BURNSDENT COM MERCIAL US395 TO I 1 82U S 1 2 CLARK C A P I TOLTAYLORFLATSHARRIS GLADE NORTHSHORELINE U S 395 Urban Gro w th B o u n d a r y Urban Growth Boundary Urban Growth B o u n d a r y Ur b a n Gr o wt h B o u n d a r yCITY LIMITS Benton County WA, Pasco GIS, Maxar 0 4,000 8,000 12,000 16,0002,000 Feet 0 4,000 8,000 12,000 16,0002,000 Feet Overview Map Item: Olberding & Farm 2005 Zoning Determination Applicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding and Farm 2005 File #: ANX 2021-003; ZD 2021-003 ANX 2021-003 City Option 01 City Limits UGA 2021 Page 93 of 354 Exhibit “A” Legal Description Olberding & Farm 2005 Annexation (ANX 2021-003) That portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2 and portions of Section 3, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Section 3; Thence Easterly along the South line of said Section 3 to the Southwest corner of said Section 2; Thence North 89°08’34” East along the South line of said Section 2 a distance of 2317.23 feet to the Southwest corner of that Exception Parcel described in Avigation Easement recorded under Auditor’s file number 1952536, records of Franklin County, Washington; Thence North 45°15’38” West along the West line of said Exception Parcel 1177.05 feet to the most westerly corner thereof; Thence North 44°44’22” East 1500.00 feet to the most northerly corner of said Exception Parcel; Thence South 45°15’38” East 217.15 feet to the East line of said Southwest Quarter of said Section 2; Thence Northerly along the East line of said Southwest corner to the Northeast corner of said Southwest Quarter; Thence Westerly along the North line of said Southwest Quarter to the Northwest corner thereof also being the East Quarter corner of said Section 3; Thence South 89°40’16” West along the North line of Parcel C of that Record of Survey recorded in Volume 3 of Survey, Page 649, records of Franklin County, Washington, 1127.58 feet; Thence North 89°02’15” West along said North line 610.26 feet; Thence South 88°49’09” West 925.06 feet to the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 3 said point being coincident with the Southeast corner of Parcel “B” of that Short Plat recorded in Book 2 of Short Plats, Page 386, records of Franklin County, Washington; Thence Northerly along the East line of said Parcel “B” to the Northeast corner of said Parcel “B”, said point being on the Southerly right of way line of Clark Road; Thence Westerly along the North line of said Parcel “B” and the Southerly right of way line of Clark Road to the most Easterly corner of Parcel “A” of said Short Plat; Thence Southwesterly along the Southeasterly line of said Parcel “A” to the most Southerly corner of said Parcel “A”, said point being on the west line of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 3; Thence Southerly along the Westerly line of said Parcel “B” to the Southwest corner of said Parcel “B”, Thence Southerly along said Westerly line of the Southwest quarter of said Section 3 to the Point of Beginning. Situate in Franklin County, State of Washington. Page 94 of 354 CITY OF PASCOFRANKLIN COUNTYPROPOSEDANNEXATION AREA618± ACRESROAD 68BURNS ROADCONVENTION DRIVE ROAD 60 ROAD 52 CLARK ROADSW 1 / 4 , S E C . 2 T . 9 N . , R . 2 9 E . , W .M . SW 1 / 4 , S E C . 3 T . 9 N . , R . 2 9 E . , W .M . NW 1 / 4 , S E C . 3 T . 9 N . , R . 2 9 E . , W .M . S E 1 / 4 , S E C . 3 T . 9 N . , R . 2 9 E . , W .M .CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTONCITY OF PASCO"OLBERDING & FARM 2005 ANNEXATION"EWSNHLA2803 River RoadYakima, WA 98902509.966.7000Fax 509.965.3800www.hlacivil.comEngineering and Land Surveying, Inc.Page 95 of 354 REPORTTOHEARINGEXAMINER CityHall–525NorthThirdAvenue–CouncilChambers WEDNESDAYFebruary9,2022 6:00PM   1 MASTERFILE#:ZD2021Ͳ003  APPLICANTS:Allen&SharylOlberding c/oJamesCarmody 230S2ndStreetSuite101 YakimaWA98907Ͳ22680  Farm2005LLC c/oJamesCarmody 230S2ndStreetSuite101 YakimaWA98907Ͳ22680  ProͲMadeHomesc/oJFEngineeringPLLC 7500W.Clearwater,STEA Kennewick,WA99336Ͳ1679     REQUEST: ZoningDetermination:Developmentofazoning recommendationfortheOlberding&Farm2005LLC Annexationofapproximately617.19acreslocatednorth ofBurnsRoadbetweenRoad44andConventionDrive.  BACKGROUND 1. PROPERTYDESCRIPTION: ThatportionoftheSouthwestquarterofSection2andSection3,Township9North, Range29East,W.M.,describedasfollows: BeginningattheSouthwestcornerofsaidSection3;ThenceEasterlyalongtheSouthline ofsaidSection3andSection2totheSouthwesterlylineoftheTriͲCitiesAirportSafety CompatibilityZone2;ThenceNorthwesterlyalongsaidSouthwesterlylineofsaidZone2 totheNorthwesterlylineofsaidZone2;ThenceNortheasterlyalongsaidNorthwesterly lineofsaidZone2totheNortheasterlylineofsaidZone2;ThenceSoutheasterlyalong saidNortheasterlylineofsaidZone2totheEastlineoftheSouthwestquarterofsaid Section2;ThenceNortherlyalongsaidEastlinetotheNortheastcornerofsaidSouthwest quarter;ThenceWesterlyalongtheNorthlineofsaidSouthwestquartertotheNorthwest cornerofsaidSouthwestquarter,whichisalsotheNortheastcorneroftheSoutheast quarterofsaidSection3;ThenceWesterlyalongtheNorthlineofsaidSoutheastcorner totheNorthwestcornerofsaidSoutheastquarter,whichisalsotheSoutheastcornerof Parcel“B”ofthatShortPlatrecordedinBook2ofShortPlats,Page386,recordsof FranklinCounty,Washington;ThenceNortherlyalongtheEastlineofsaidParcel“B”to Page 96 of 354 2 theNortheastcornerofsaidParcel“B”;ThenceWesterlyalongtheNorthlineofsaid Parcel“B”tothemostEasterlycornerofParcel“A”ofsaidShortPlat;Thence SouthwesterlyalongtheSoutheasterlylineofsaidParcel“A”tothemostSoutherlycorner ofsaidParcel“A”;ThenceSoutherlyalongtheWesterlylineofsaidParcel“B”tothe SouthwestcornerofsaidParcel“B”;ThenceSoutherlyalongtheWesterlylineofthe SouthwestquarterofsaidSection3tothePointofBeginning; SituatedinFranklinCounty,StateofWashington. (Parcels114330031,114330041,114330042,114330043,114330044,114330046, 114330047,114330048,andthatportionofparcel114250016lyingwithintheCityof PascoUrbanGrowthArea). GeneralLocation:Approximately617.19acresoflandnorthofBurnsRoadbetweenRoad 44andConventionDrive. PropertySize: ParcelTaxpayerNameAcres 114250016FARM2005LLC130.70 114330031ALLEN&CHERYLOLBERDING158.15 114330044ALLEN&CHERYLOLBERDING40.88 114330042ALLEN&CHERYLOLBERDING40.89 114330041ALLEN&CHERYLOLBERDING41.22 114330043ALLEN&CHERYLOLBERDING40.77 114330047PASCOSCHOOLDISTRICTNO.141.49 114330046PASCOSCHOOLDISTRICTNO.140.69 114330045FREDOLBERDING41.03 114330048FREDOLBERDING41.38 Total617.19  2. ACCESS:ThesiteisaccessedfromBurnsRoadbetweenRoad44andConventionDrive alongthesouthpropertylinesandonClarkRoadalongthenorthpropertylines. 3. UTILITIES:ExistingwaterserviceislocatedinConventionDrive,OchocoLane,Robert WayneDrive,Road60,RocketLane,andRoad52,allsouthofBurnsRoad.Existingsewer serviceislocatedinOchocoLane,RobertWayneDrive,RocketLane,andCurlewLane,all southofBurnsRoad.Waterandseweravailabilitymaybelimiteduntillater. 4. LANDUSEANDZONING:ThesiteiszonedAPͲ20(AgriculturalProduction—County)and isbeingfarmedwithirrigationpivots. Surroundingpropertiesarezonedanddevelopedasfollows: NORTH:APͲ20(County)Agriculture EAST:APͲ20;RRͲ1(County)Agriculture;SFDUs SOUTH:RͲ1;RSͲ1;RSͲ1ͲPUDSFDUs Page 97 of 354 3 WEST:APͲ20;RRͲ1;RSͲ40(County)Agriculture;SFDUs  5. COMPREHENSIVEPLAN:TheComprehensivePlandesignatesthesiteforLowDensity Residential,MediumͲDensityResidential,Commercial,andPublic/QuasiͲPublicuses(See ComprehensivePlanMap). 6. ENVIRONMENTALDETERMINATION:TheCityofPascoistheleadagencyforthisproject. Anenvironmentaldeterminationwillbemadeafterthepublichearingforthisproject.A DeterminationofNonͲSignificanceoraMitigatedDeterminationofNonͲSignificanceis likelyforthisapplication(WAC197Ͳ11Ͳ355).  ANALYSIS OnJuly19,2021,theCityCouncilapprovedaresolution(Resolution4079)acceptinganoticeof intenttoannexapproximately617.19acresgenerallylocatedintheareanorthofBurnsRoad betweenRoad44andConventionDrive. FollowingacceptanceoftheNoticeofIntentandpriortoCouncilactiononanannexation petition,theHearingExamineristoholdazoningdeterminationhearing.Thepurposeofsaid hearingisfortheHearingExaminertorecommendappropriatezoningdistrictsfortheproposed annexationareaintheeventitmaybecomepartoftheCity. Indeterminingthemostappropriatezoningfortheannexationarea,theHearingExaminerneeds toconsidertheexistinglanduses,nearbydevelopment,zoning,policiesoftheComprehensive PlanandtheLandUseDesignationsoftheLandUseMap.TheHearingExamineralsoneedstobe guidedbythecriteriainPMC25.210.060(asdiscussedbelow)indevelopingazoning recommendation. Thepurposeoftheannexationistoexpandprimarilyresidentialandcommercialopportunities withintheCityofPasco’sUrbanGrowthArea(UGA).Schoolfacilitiesarealsocontemplatedon thesite. Tomaintainconsistencywithcurrentzoning,landuses,utilityplanningandtheComprehensive Plan,appropriatezoningshouldbeappliedtotheproposedannexationarea. TheinitialreviewcriteriaforconsideringarezoneapplicationareexplainedinPMC25.210.030. Thecriteriaarelistedbelowasfollows: (1)Thedatetheexistingzonebecameeffective: ThecurrentzoningwasinitiatedbytheCounty(Noknowndate). (2)Thechangedconditionswhichareallegedtowarrantotheroradditionalzoning: •ThepropertyislocatedwithinthePascoUrbanGrowthBoundary. •ThepropertyinquestionisbeingannexedtotheCityofPasco. •Uponannexationthepropertywillneedtobezoned. Page 98 of 354 4 (3)Factstojustifythechangeonthebasisofadvancingthepublichealth,safetyandgeneral welfare: ThepropertyisbeingannexedtotheCityandwillneedtobezoned.Thejustificationforthe rezoneisthefactthatifazoningdesignationisnotdeterminedthepropertycouldbecome annexedwithoutzoning.Fortheadvancementofthegeneralwelfareofthecommunitythe propertyneedstobezoned. (4)Theeffectitwillhaveonthevalueandcharacteroftheadjacentpropertyandthe ComprehensivePlan: ApplicantshaverequestedCͲ1(RetailBusiness),RͲ1(LowͲDensityResidential),andRͲ3(MediumͲ DensityResidential)zoningforthearea;rezoningthepropertytoCͲ1,RͲ1,andRͲ3willalign closelywiththeComprehensivePlanLandUsedesignationsforthearea. (5)Theeffectonthepropertyownerorownersiftherequestisnotgranted: Withouttheannexationareabeingassignedaspecificzoningdistrict,theareawillessentiallybe unͲzoneduponannexation.Theareaneedstobezonedtoprovidecertaintyandbenefittothe propertyowners,developers,andadjoiningpropertyowners. (6)TheComprehensivePlanlandusedesignationfortheproperty: TheparcelsarealllocatedwithintheUrbanGrowthArea(UGA);parcelsintheproposed annexationareaaredesignatedbytheComprehensivePlanmapforLowDensityResidential, MediumͲDensityResidential,Commercial,andPublic/QuasiͲPublicuses(SeeComprehensive PlanMap). TheDescriptionandAllocationTableoftheComprehensivePlanspecifiesthefollowingPurposes, Descriptions,andallowedzoningforeachLandUseDesignation: ClassificationPurposeandDescriptionZoning* LowDensityResidentialSinglefamilyresidentialdevelopmentata densityof2to5dwellingunitsperacre RͲSͲ20;RͲSͲ12;RͲSͲ1;RͲ 1;RͲ1ͲA;RͲ1ͲA2 MediumDensity Residential SingleͲfamilydwellings,patiohomes, townhouses,apartments,and condominiumsatadensityof6to20 dwellingunitsperacre RͲ2throughRͲ4;RP Commercial Neighborhood,communityandregional shoppingandspecialtycenters,business parks,serviceandofficeuses O;BP;CͲ1;CͲ2;CͲ3;CR PublicandQuasiͲPublic Schools,civiccenters,firestationsand otherpublicuses BySpecialPermitinall districts(exceptIͲ3 whichhasvarious restrictions) TheproposedannexationareaiswithintheCity’sserviceareaasidentifiedintheComprehensive WaterandSewerPlans. (7)SuchotherinformationastheHearingExaminerrequires: Page 99 of 354 5 Thesitecontainsapproximately617.19acresandislocatednorthofBurnsRoadbetweenRoad 44andConventionDrive.Contiguouspropertiestothesouthwereannexedin1981(Ordinance 2388),2002(Ordinance3572),and2006(Ordinance3788). ThesoutheastportionofParcel114250016islocatedwithintheTriͲCities(PSC)Airportrunway 12glidepath,asindicatedintheattached“AirportClearZones”mapandissubjecttomore stringentdensityconsiderations;assuch,ithasbeenexcludedfromboththeproposed annexationandtheproposedzoningdetermination. ThebalanceofParcel114250016wasoriginallyslatedforRSͲ12zoning;however,onThursday December2,2021StaffreceivedaforwardedzonecorrectionrequestfromFarm2005property representativeDaveSwisher,asfollows: “ItlooksthezoningofRͲ12wasamistakeontheannexationletterthatisbeing sentouttothepublic.WewouldliketheprescribedzoningtobeRͲ1ratherthan RͲ12aswediscussedpreviously Staffsentoutarevisedproposedzoningmapasrequested;however,inresponsetotheproposed adjustmentStaffreceivedanemailonMondayDecember13fromTriͲCitiesAirportDirectorBuck TaftpointingoutthezoningrestrictionsfoundinPMC25.190.090,asfollows: Zone4–OuterApproach/DepartureZone.Prohibitedlanduseswithinthiszone are:placesofpublicassemblysuchaschurches,exceptexistingchurchesshallbe permittedtoexpand,schools(KͲ12),hospitals,shoppingcentersandotheruses withsimilarconcentrationsofpersons.ResidentialdensityislimitedtoRͲSͲ20 exceptsouthofIͲ182.Allnewresidentialdevelopmentmustincludethedisclosure statementinPMC25.190.100onplats,shortplatsandbindingsiteplans. AsaportionofParcel114250016islocatedwithinaFederalAviationRegulation(FAR)Part77 obstructionidentificationsurface(OIS)Zone4–OuterApproach/DepartureZone,asindicatedin theattached“AirportClearZones”map,andasnotedabove,allowabledensityintheseareasis limitedtoRͲSͲ20(20,000ͲsquareͲfootͲlots). IthasbeendeterminedbytheDirectorofCommunity&EconomicDevelopment,inconsultation withtheCityAttorneysthatthisparcelmaybezonedRͲ1ifthedensitywithinthe abovementioned(OIS)Zone4–OuterApproach/DepartureZonedoesnotexceedRSͲ20density. ApplicantsmaybeabletoreallocatedensitywithintheareausingaPlannedͲUnitDevelopment (PUD)strategytoachieveaverageRͲ1densitythroughoutthedevelopmentarea.  INITIALSTAFFFINDINGSOFFACT Findingsoffactmustbeenteredfromtherecord.Thefollowingareinitialfindingsdrawnfrom thebackgroundandanalysissectionofthestaffreport.TheHearingExaminermayaddadditional findingstothislistingastheresultoffactualtestimonyandevidencesubmittedduringtheopen recordhearing. 1. PublicnoticeofthishearingwaspostedintheTriͲCityHeraldandsenttoproperty ownerswithin300feetofthepropertyonNovember19,2021,andacorrectednotice Page 100 of 354 6 onDecember9,2021. 2. TheCityCouncilapprovedresolution4097acceptinganoticeofintenttoannexon July19,2021. 3. Theproposedannexationareacomprises617.19acres. 4. ThesiteislocatednorthofBurnsRoadbetweenRoad44andConventionDrive. 5. ThecurrentzoningwasinitiatedbytheCounty(Noknowndate). 6. ThepropertyislocatedwithinthePascoUrbanGrowthBoundary. 7. Applicantshaverequestedthefollowingzoning: a. CͲ1(RetailBusiness) b. RͲ1(LowͲDensityResidential c. RͲ3(MediumͲDensityResidential) 8. RezoningthepropertytoCͲ1,RͲ1,andRͲ3willaligncloselywiththeComprehensive PlanLandUsedesignationsforthearea. 9. ThesoutheastportionofParcel114250016islocatedwithintheTriͲCities(PSC) Airportrunway12glidepath. 10. TheaforesaidportionofParcel114250016issubjecttomorestringentdensity considerations. 11. TheaforesaidportionofParcel114250016hasbeenexcludedfromboththe proposedannexationandtheproposedzoningdetermination. 12. AportionofParcel114250016islocatedwithinaFARPart77OISZone4. 13. AsperPMC25.190.090,residentialdensitywithinanOISZone4islimitedtoRͲSͲ20 densityexceptsouthofIͲ182. 14. AllnewresidentialdevelopmentwithinanOISZone4mustincludethedisclosure statementinPMC25.190.100onplats,shortplats,andbindingsiteplans. 15. TheComprehensivePlanLandUseDesignationsforthepropertyincludethe following: a. LowDensityResidential b. MediumͲDensityResidential c. Commercial d. Public/QuasiͲPublicuses 16. Contiguouspropertiestothesouthwereannexedin1981,2002,and2006. 17. TheparcelsarealllocatedwithintheUrbanGrowthArea(UGA) 18. TheDescriptionandAllocationTableoftheComprehensivePlanspecifiesthe followingPurposes,Descriptions,andallowedzoningforeachLandUseDesignation: a. LowDensityResidential:Singlefamilyresidentialdevelopmentatadensityof2to 5dwellingunitsperacre;RͲSͲ20,RͲSͲ12,RͲSͲ1,RͲ1,RͲ1ͲA,andRͲ1ͲA2Zoning b. MediumDensityResidential:SingleͲfamilydwellings,patiohomes,townhouses, apartments,andcondominiumsatadensityof6to20dwellingunitsperacre;RͲ Page 101 of 354 7 2throughRͲ4andRPzoning c. Commercial:Neighborhood,communityandregionalshoppingandspecialty centers,businessparks,serviceandofficeuses;O,BP,CͲ1,CͲ2,CͲ3,andCRzoning d. PublicandQuasiͲPublic:Schools,civiccenters,firestationsandotherpublicuses; allowedbySpecialPermitinalldistricts(exceptIͲ3whichhasvariousrestrictions) 19. TheproposedannexationareaiswithintheCity’sserviceareaasidentifiedinthe ComprehensiveWaterandSewerPlans.  TENTATIVECONCLUSIONSBASEDONINITIALSTAFFFINDINGSOFFACT BeforerecommendingapprovalordenialofarezonetheHearingExaminermustdevelopits conclusionsfromthefindingsoffactbaseduponthecriterialistedinPMC25.210.060and determinewhetherornot: 1. TheproposalisinaccordwiththegoalsandpoliciesoftheComprehensivePlan. ApplicantshaverequestedCͲ1(RetailBusiness),RͲ1(LowͲDensityResidential),andRͲ3 (MediumͲDensityResidential)zoningforthearea;rezoningthepropertytoCͲ1,RͲ1,and RͲ3willaligncloselywiththeComprehensivePlanLandUsedesignationsforthearea. 2. Theeffectoftheproposalontheimmediatevicinitywillnotbemateriallydetrimental. ZoningtheproposedannexationareaCͲ1(RetailBusiness),RͲ1(LowͲDensityResidential), andRͲ3(MediumͲDensityResidential)willcausethesitetobeconsistentwiththe ComprehensivePlanandcompatiblewithdevelopmentbothexistingandtakingplaceto thesouth.Therezonewillcomplementtheexistingneighborhoodsratherthanbea detriment. 3. Thereismeritandvalueintheproposalforthecommunityasawhole. ThereismeritandvalueinfollowingtheguidanceoftheComprehensivePlanwhen assigningzoningtopropertieswithinthecommunity.ThePlanhasindicatedthisproperty shouldbezonedLowDensityResidential,MediumͲDensityResidential,Commercial,and Public/QuasiͲPublicuses(SeeComprehensivePlanMap).AssigningCͲ1,RͲ1,andRͲ3 Page 102 of 354 8 zoningwillleadtoadditionalhousing,convenientshopping,andemployment opportunitiesforPascoresidents. 4. Conditionsshouldbeimposedinordertomitigateanysignificantadverseimpactsfrom theproposal. AllnewresidentialdevelopmentwithinanOISZone4mustincludethedisclosure statementinPMC25.190.100onplats,shortplats,andbindingsiteplans. TheproposalisotherwiseconsistentwiththeComprehensivePlan.Applicantshallbe requiredtoinstallimprovementsandinfrastructureperCityofPascorequirements. 5. AconcomitantagreementshouldbeenteredintobetweentheCityandthepetitioner, andifso,thetermsandconditionsofsuchanagreement. Aconcomitantagreementisnotneeded.  RECOMMENDATION StaffrecommendstheCityCouncilzonetheOlberding&Farm2005LLCAnnexationArea, comprisingparcels114330031,114330041,114330042,114330043,114330044,114330046, 114330047,114330048,andthatportionofparcel114250016lyingwithintheCityofPasco UrbanGrowthArea,tothefollowingzoningdesignations:CͲ1(RetailBusiness),RͲ1(LowͲDensity Residential),andRͲ3(MediumͲDensityResidential),asdepictedontheproposedzoningmap (“ExhibitA”)attachedtotheFebruary9,2022HearingExaminerreport.  Page 103 of 354 R-1R-3C-1R-1R-3R-1CITY LIMITSCITY LIMITSROAD 68CLARK RDZone 4Zone 1Zone 2Zone 2Zone 3Zone 3RS-20 DensityOverlay ZoneUrban Growth BoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryUrban Growth Boundary1143300481143300471143300461143300451143300441143300431143300421143300411143300311142500160 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500FeetLegendC-1R-1R-3City LimitsUGA 2021Zone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4RS-20 Density Overlay ZoneItem: Olberding & Farm 2005 AnnexationApplicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding & Steve West/Farm 2005File #: ANX 2021-003; ZD 2021-003Revised"Exhibit A"Page 104 of 354 20THDENTSTE ARMANCOURTHILLSBOROWERNETTR O AD 6 8 ROAD 444TH ROAD 5214THINDUS T RIA L PEARL5THBURDEN4 T H BROADMOORARGENTSANDIFURROAD 84KARTCHNERROAD 100I-182R A IL R O A D ROAD 36BURNSUS 3 9 5 I-182US 395 BURNSDENT C O MMERCIALUS395TOI18 2US 12CLARKCAPIT O L TAYLOR FLATSHARRISGLADE N O R T H SHOR E L INE US395UrbanGrowthBoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryU rbanG row thBoundaryCITY LIMITSBenton County WA, Pasco GIS, Maxar0 4,000 8,000 12,000 16,0002,000Feet0 4,000 8,000 12,000 16,0002,000FeetOverviewMapItem: Olberding & Farm 2005 Zoning DeterminationApplicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding and Farm 2005File #: $1;ZD 2021-003ANX 2021-003 City Option 01City LimitsUGA 2021Page 105 of 354 ROAD 6 8 SANDIFURDENTCLARKBURNSTAYLOR FLATSCITY LIMITSCITY LIMITSUrban Growth BoundaryUrban Growth BoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryBenton County WA, Pasco GIS, Maxar0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500Feet0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500FeetVicinityMapItem: Olberding & Farm 2005 Zoning DeterminationApplicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding and Farm 2005File #: $1;ZD 2021-003ANX 2021-003 City Option 01City LimitsUGA 2021Page 106 of 354 SFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsMultiunitsSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDUotherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDUotherSFDUotherSFDUotherSFDU otherSFDUotherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDUotherSFDU otherSFDUotherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDU otherSFDU otherAirportReserveCommercialSchoolPublic assemblyAgricultureAgricultureAgricultureFoodProcessingAgricultureAgricultureVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantVacantROAD 68CLARK RDUrban Growth BoundaryUrban Growth BoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryCITY LIMITSCITY LIMITS0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500FeetLand UseMapItem: Olberding & Farm 2005 Zoning DeterminationApplicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding and Farm 2005File #: $1;ZD 2021-003ANX 2021-003 City Option 01City LimitsUGA 2021Page 107 of 354 C-1R-1R-1R-S-1RTRTR-S-1/PUDRS-20(County)RR-1(County)I-2(County)RS-40(County)RR-1(County)C-1(County)AP-20(County)AP-20(County)AP-20(County)ROAD 68CLARK RDUrban Growth BoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryUrban Growth BoundaryCITY LIMITSCITY LIMITS0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500FeetZoningMapItem: Olberding & Farm 2005 Zoning DeterminationApplicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding and Farm 2005File #: ANX 2021-003 & ZD 2021-003UGA 2021Proposed Annexation AreaCity LimitsZoningC-1R-1R-4R-S-1R-S-1/PUDRTCounty ZoningAP-20C-1I-2RR-1RS-20RS-40Page 108 of 354 Low DensityResidentialLow DensityResidentialMediumDensityResidentialCommercialCommercialHigh DensityResidentialCommercialMedium DensityResidentialLow DensityResidentialMixedResidentialCommercialOpen SpaceParksOpen SpaceParksOpen SpaceParksLow DensityResidentialCommercialPublicQuasi-PublicLow DensityResidentialLow DensityResidentialPublicQuasi-PublicMedium DensityResidentialMixedResidentialCommercialMedium DensityResidentialAirportReserveOpen SpaceParksROAD 68CLARK RDUrban Growth BoundaryUrban Growth BoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryCITY LIMITSCITY LIMITS0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500FeetComp PlanMapItem: Olberding & Farm 2005 Zoning DeterminationApplicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding and Farm 2005File #: $1;ZD 2021-003ANX 2021-003 City Option 01City LimitsUGA 2021Page 109 of 354 ROAD 68CLARK RDZone 4Zone 1Zone 2Zone 2Zone 2Zone 3Zone 3Urban Growth BoundaryUrban Growth BoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryCITY LIMITSCITY LIMITS0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500FeetAirportClear ZonesItem: Olberding & Farm 2005 Zoning DeterminationApplicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding and Farm 2005File #: $1;ZD 2021-003ANX 2021-003 City Option 01City LimitsUGA 2021Page 110 of 354 Looking NorthPage 111 of 354 Looking NortheastLooking NortheastPage 112 of 354 Looking EastLooking EastPage 113 of 354 Looking SoutheastLooking SoutheastPage 114 of 354 Looking SouthLooking SouthPage 115 of 354 Looking SouthwestLooking SouthwestPage 116 of 354 Looking WestLooking WestPage 117 of 354 Looking NorthwestLooking NorthwestPage 118 of 354 OLBERDING ANNEXATION PROPOSED ZONING AREAS BIG SKY DEVELOPERS, LLC CITY OF PASCO 8000-004 8/03/21 DJF 1 of 1LAND USE & ZONING DESIGNATIONSN 114330048 41.4 AC 114330047114330046115130055 115160013 115160102 114330045 41.0 AC (LDR, R-1 ZONING) 26.4 AC (MDR, R-3 ZONING) 15.0 AC (COM, C-1 ZONING) Page 119 of 354 :&OHDUZDWHU$YH67($ŀ.HQQHZLFN:$ŀŀ-)(QJLQHHULQJSUR -)(QJLQHHULQJ3//& :&OHDUZDWHU67($ .HQQHZLFN:$ $XJXVW 0U5LFN:KLWH &RPPXQLW\DQG(FRQRPLF'HYHORSPHQW'LUHFWRU &LW\RI3DVFR 1UG$YHQXH 3DVFR:$ 5(53'HYHORSPHQW2OEHUGLQJ3URSHUW\]RQLQJ $V\RXDQG,KDYHUHFHQWO\GLVFXVVHGP\&OLHQW3UR0DGH+RPHVRZQVSURSHUW\WKDW KDVUHFHQWO\EHHQEURXJKWLQWRWKH&LW\·V8UEDQ*URZWK$UHD7KHLUDSSUR[LPDWHO\DFUH SDUFHOLVLQWKH1:TXDGUDQWRI5'DQG%XUQV5GJHQHUDOO\WKH6(õRIWKH6(õ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age 120 of 354 60% R-1 Low Density Res40% R-3 Med Density Res114330041114330042114330043114330044EXHIBIT 'A' 10/04/21NPage 121 of 354 00 : &OeDUwDteU AYe 6TE A ŀ .ennewiFN :A 336 ŀ 0114 ŀ -)EnJineeUinJSUo -)(QJLQHHULQJ3//& 00 : &OeDUwDteU 6TE A .ennewiFN :A 336-16 2FtoEeU 4 2021 MU RiFN :Kite &oPPXnity Dnd EFonoPiF DeYeOoSPent DiUeFtoU &ity oI 3DsFo 2 N 3Ud AYenXe 3DsFo :A 301 RE 53'HYHORSPHQW2OEHUGLQJ3URSHUW\]RQLQJ TKis OetteU is SUoYided Ds D FoUUeFtion to tKe SUeYioXs OetteU I SUeSDUed dDted AXJXst 1 2021 3Uo MDde HoPes owns SUoSeUty oU KDs SUoSeUty tKDt is XndeU SXUFKDse FontUDFt witK AOOen &KeUyO 2OEeUdinJ tKDt KDs UeFentOy Eeen EUoXJKt into tKe &ity·s 8UEDn *UowtK AUeD TKeiU FontUoOOinJ inteUest FoYeUs DSSUo[iPDteOy 163-DFUes Dnd is OoFDted Dt tKe N: TXDdUDnt oI RD 2 Dnd BXUns Rd JeneUDOOy desFUiEed Ds tKe 6E õ oI 6eF 3 TN R2E &o 3DUFeO·s 114330041 114330042 114330043 Dnd 114330044  :itKin tKe UeFentOy DdoSted 201 &ity oI 3DsFo &oPSUeKensiYe 3ODn tKe SUoSeUty KDs Eeen desiJnDted witK tKe soXtKeUn 40% Ds MediXP-Density ResidentiDO Dnd tKe noUtKeUOy 60% oI tKe SUoSeUty Ds Low-Density ResidentiDO In FonsideUDtion oI tKese SODnned densities we DUe UeTXestinJ tKe IoOOowinJ ]oninJ Ee DssiJned to tKe SUoSeUty 6ee DttDFKed E[KiEit ¶A·  6oXtKeUn 40% R-3 MediXP-Density ResidentiDO DistUiFt NoUtKeUn 60% R-1 Low-Density ResidentiDO DistUiFt TKDnN yoX IoU tKe oSSoUtXnity to SUoYide yoX witK tKis inIoUPDtion Dnd SOeDse Oet Pe Nnow iI yoX KDYe Dny TXestions oU need Dny DdditionDO inIoUPDtion 6inFeUeOy -oKn )etteUoOI 3E 2wneU -) EnJineeUinJ 3LL& FF 6teYen BDXPDn R3 DeYeOoSPent =oninJ ReT LtUdoF[ -oKn )etteUoOI Page 122 of 354 00 : &OeDUwDteU AYe 6TE A ŀ .ennewiFN :A 336 ŀ 0114 ŀ -)EnJineeUinJSUo -)(QJLQHHULQJ3//& 00 : &OeDUwDteU 6TE A .ennewiFN :A 336-16 NoYePEeU 12 2021 MU RiFN :Kite &oPPXnity Dnd EFonoPiF DeYeOoSPent DiUeFtoU &ity oI 3DsFo 2 N 3Ud AYenXe 3DsFo :A 301 RE 53'HYHORSPHQW2OEHUGLQJ3URSHUW\]RQLQJ TKis OetteU is SUoYided Ds D UeYision to tKe SUeYioXs OetteU I SUeSDUed dDted 2FtoEeU 4 2021 3Uo MDde HoPes owns SUoSeUty oU KDs SUoSeUty tKDt is XndeU SXUFKDse FontUDFt witK AOOen &KeUyO 2OEeUdinJ tKDt KDs UeFentOy Eeen EUoXJKt into tKe &ity·s 8UEDn *UowtK AUeD TKeiU FontUoOOinJ inteUest FoYeUs DSSUo[iPDteOy 163-DFUes Dnd is OoFDted Dt tKe N: TXDdUDnt oI RD 2 Dnd BXUns Rd JeneUDOOy desFUiEed Ds tKe 6E õ oI 6eF 3 TN R2E &o 3DUFeO·s 114330041 114330042 114330043 Dnd 114330044  :itKin tKe UeFentOy DdoSted 201 &ity oI 3DsFo &oPSUeKensiYe 3ODn tKe SUoSeUty KDs Eeen desiJnDted witK tKe soXtKeUn 20% Ds MediXP-Density ResidentiDO Dnd tKe noUtKeUOy 0% oI tKe SUoSeUty Ds Low-Density ResidentiDO In FonsideUDtion oI tKese SODnned densities we DUe UeTXestinJ tKe IoOOowinJ ]oninJ Ee DssiJned to tKe SUoSeUty 6ee DttDFKed E[KiEit ¶A·  6oXtKeUn 20% R-3 MediXP-Density ResidentiDO DistUiFt NoUtKeUn 0% R-1 Low-Density ResidentiDO DistUiFt TKDnN yoX IoU tKe oSSoUtXnity to SUoYide yoX witK tKis inIoUPDtion Dnd SOeDse Oet Pe Nnow iI yoX KDYe Dny TXestions oU need Dny DdditionDO inIoUPDtion 6inFeUeOy -oKn )etteUoOI 3E 2wneU -) EnJineeUinJ 3LL& FF 6teYen BDXPDn R3 DeYeOoSPent =oninJ ReT LtUdoF[ -oKn )etteUoOI Page 123 of 354 Page 124 of 354 Page 125 of 354 Page 126 of 354 Page 127 of 354 Page 128 of 354 Page 129 of 354  *** * *%f*f*/f%f&)%f &*"ff"%*f %f "*"*f *%f %!!#f "#.*%"f &(%")f %(f *f % ("f f (!f f "".*%"f &(%,"f f *(!"*%"f %"f *f %+#(/f *%f f "$.f "f -*(f )!+ *"%+)f 0%"#f "f *f ))+!&*%"f %f %"f"*"))f- ff('+(f   *NKf!1bf f f1K7f\K9f f fY@9fN_K9RVfN;fKNYfE9VVfY@1KfY9Kf fP9R69KYf BKY9R9VYfBKf PRNP9R[bfEN61Y97f _BY@BKf1fPNR[BNKfN;fYA9f "NR[@_9VYf6NG9RfN;f)96YBNKf f*N_KV@BPff "NR[Af (1K?9f f 1VYf -BEE3J9YY9f !9RB7B1Kf @1^9f =E97f 1f "NYB69f N;f KY9KYf YNf NHH9K69f KK9`1YBNKf&RN6997BK?VfYNfYA9fBYbfN;f&1V6Nf1K7f   *YA9fBYbfN\K6BEfN;fY@9fBYbfN;f&1V6Nf@1Vf R9^B9_97f YA9f"NYB69fN;fKY9KYf1K7f @1Vf79Y9RHBK97fYA9f1KK9`1YBNKfVBY9f1VfHN7B=97f4bfYA9fBYbfBVf _BY@BKfY@9f&1V6Nf+R41LfRN_YAf R91f6NKYB?\N\Vf_BY@fY@9fBYbf1KK9`1YBNKfN;fY@9fVBY9f_N\E7f49f1fK1Y]R1Ef9aY9KVBNKfN;fY@9fBYbf1K7f V1C7f1LK9`1YBNKf_N\E7fYA9fBKf49VYfBKY9R9VYfN;fYA9f&1V6Nf6NHH\KBYbf *   * * *  ** * ** *  *   *** *A1YfY@9fBYbf_BEEf1669PYfYA9f PRNPNV97fY9RRBYNRdfYNf49f1KK9`97f1VfHN7B=97f4bfY@9fBYbf1Vf 79V6RC497fBKf ) !!&**1K7f79PB6Y97fBKf ) !!&* *1YY16@97f@9R9YNf *&*'$& $*%#"(*YA1YfY@9fY9TBYNRcfYNf49f1KK9`97f_BEEfKNYfR9Q\BR9fVBH\EY1K9N\Vf 17NPYBNKfN;feNKBK?fR9?\E1YBNKVf 0NKBK?f_BEEf49f79Y9RHBK97fYARN\?Af1fP]4EB6f@91SBK?fPRN69VVf_BY@f BKP\Yf>NHf1<96Y97fPRNP9R[bfN_K9RWf1K7f1Vf6NKVBVY9KYf_BY@fYA9fBYbVfNHPR9@9KVB^9f&E1Kf *&*'$& $*%#"(*YA1YfYA9f1KK9a1YBNKf1R91f_BEEf49fR9Q\BR97fYNf1VV\H9f1fPRNPNUBNK1Y9f X@2R:fO;f9`BVYBK?fCZcf5OM8:8fCK8:5Z:8M:XXf  *4bfY@9fCYbfN]K6BFfN;fY@9fBYbfN;f&1V6Nf-1V@BK?YNKfY@BVf 71dfN;f\Ebf f !1bNRf **)*f 94R1f1R@1If!f BYbfF9RDf           &&(%,f)f*%f%(!f Page 130 of 354   "" " ""3 "" " "!" *%)+3'"+3  3')"33 ++3 ')"3%3"$3"%+3 $33 '%2+ %$3%3++3)+ $3 ')"3%3"$3 %$/13*3')"3313 3)%)3-$)3- +%)*3 "3$-#)3  3 )%)*3%3 )$!" $3%-$+13 0* $+%$3"%+3 $33'%)+ %$3%3*+ %$33+%0$* '33$%)+3)$3 3 *+3 0 ""#++3 #)  $3 )$!" $3 %-$+13 0* $+%$3 *) 3 *3 %""%0*3  $$ $3+3+3$%)+0*+3 %#)3%3+3 *%-+*+3(-)+)3%3* 3*+ %$33+$3 *%-+3  30*+3"%$3+30*+3" $3%3* 33')"33 3+3+$3*%-+3 3  30*+3"%$3+30*+3" $3%3* 33')"33 3+3+%3+3*%-+3" $3%3 +3$%)+0*+3(-)+)3%3* 3*%-+*+3(-)+)3+$3$%)+3  3 *+3"%$3+3 *%-+3 " $3 %3 * 3 $%)+0*+3 (-)+)3    3 +3 +%3 +3*%-+*+3 %#)3 +)%3 +$3$%)+3 33*+3"%$3+3*+3" $3%3* 3$%)+0*+3(-)+)3  3+3+%3 +3$%)+3 " $3%3* 3 3')"3+$3$%)+3  3 0*+3"%$3 +3$%)+3" $3%3 * 33')"33  3+3+$3*%-+3 30*+3"%$3+3$%)+3" $3%3* 3 3')"33  3+3+%3+3'% $+3%3 $$ $3 ++3 ')"3%3"$3"%+3 $33'%)+ %$3%3++3)+ $3')"3%3"$3 %$/13*3')"33 133)%)3 -$)3 - +%)*3 "3$-#)3  3)%)*3%3 )$!" $3%-$+130* $+%$3"%+3 $33'%)+ %$3%3*+ %$33+%0$* '33 $&)+3 )$3 3 *+3 0 ""#++3 #)  $3 )$!" $3 %-$+13 0* $+%$3 *) 3 *3 %""%0*3  $$ $3+3 +3 $%)+*+3%)$)3%3 +3*%-+*+3 (-)+)3%3* 3 *+ %$33 +$3 *%-+3 30*+3 "%$3+3*+3" $3 %3* 3*%-+*+3(.)+)3  3+3+%3 +3 *%-+*+3%)$)33 +3$%)+*+3 (-)+)3%3 * 3 *%-+*+3(-)+)3 +$3*%-+3   30*+3"%$3+3*%-+3" $3%3* 3$%)+*+3(-)+)3%3* 3*%-+*+3(-)+)3  3+3+%3+3*%-+0*+3%#)3+)%3+$3$%)+3 3*+3"%$3+30*+3 " $3%3* 3$%)+*+3(-)+)3+3 *%-+*+3 (-)+)3  3+3+%3+3$%)+3" $3%3 * 33 ')"33 +$3 *%-+3  3*+3 "%$3 +3$%)+3 " $3%3 * 33 ')"33   3+3+$3$%)+3  3*+3"%$3+3$%)+3" $3%3* 33')"3 3  3+3+%3+3'% $+3%3 $$ $3 ++3 ')"3%3"$3 "%+3 $33'%)+ %$3%3++3)+ $3')"3%3"$3 %$/13*3')"33 133)%)3 -$)3- +%)*3 "3 $-#)3  3 )%)*3%3 )$!" $3%-$+130* $+%$3"%+3 $33'%)+ %$3%3*+ %$33+%0$* '33$%)+3 )$3 3 *+3 0 ""#++3 #)  $3 )$!" $3 %-$+13 0* $+%$3 *) 3 *3 %""%0*3  $$ $3+3+3*%-+0*+3%#)3%+33*%-+*+3(-)+)3%3* 3*+ %$33+$3 $%)+3 3*+3 "%$3+3 *%-+3 " $3%3* 3 *%-+*+3(-)+)3  3+3+%3+3 *%-+*+3%)$)3%3+3*%-+0*+3(-)+)3%3* 3*%-+*+3(-)+)3+$3 $%)+3 3 3*+3"%$3+3 *+3" $3%3* 3*%-+0*+3 (-)+)3%3+3 *%-+*+3 (-)+)3   3+3+%3+3$%)+*+3%#)3+)%3+$3*%-+3  30*+3"%$3+3$%)+3 " $3%3* 3*%-+0*+3(-)+)3 %3+3*%-+*+3(-)+)3    3+3+%3+30*+3" $3%3 * 33')"33+$3*%-+3 3  30*+3"%$3+30*+3" $3%3* 33')"3 3  3+3+$3*%-+3  30*+3"%$3+30*+3" $3 %3* 33 ')"33  3+3+%3+3'% $,3%3 $$ $3 Page 131 of 354  . .4),$4'4$&4!&4. 4-'0. -.4*0,.,4'4. 4-'0. -.4*0,.,4 '4-.!'&44 .'2&- !)44&',. 4 ,&4 4 -.4 2!$$%..4 %,!!&4,&#$!&4'0&.34 2- !&.'&4-,!4-4'$$'2-4!&&!&4.4. 4-'0. -.4',&,4'4-!4-'0. -.4 *0,.,4'4-.!'&44. &4&',. 4 4-.4 $'&4. 4-.4 $!&4'4-!4-'0. -.4 *0,.,4'4. 4-'0. -.4*0,.,4  4.4.'4. 4&',. -.4',&,4. ,'4. &4 -'0. 4  42-.4 $'&4. 4 &',. 4$!&4'4-!4-'0. -.4*0,.,4'4. 4-'0. -.4 *0,.,4  4.4.'4. 4&',. 2-.4'%,4. ,'4. &4-'0. 4 442-.4$'&4 . 42-.4$!&4'4-!4 -'0. -.4*0,.,4'4 . 4-'0. -.4*0,.,4   4 .4.'4 . 4 -'0. 2-.4 '%,4 . ,'4 . &4 &',. 4  4 -.4$'&4 . 4 -'0. 4 $!&4 '4 -!4 -'0. -.4*0,.,4'4. 4-'0. -.4*0,.,4  4.4.'4. 4)'!&.4'4!&&!&4  4)',.!'&4'4-.!'&44 .'2&- !)44&',. 4,&4 4-.4 2%4,&#$!&4 '0&.34 2- !&.'&4$-'4 !&44 )',.!'&4'4),$44-4- '2&4'&4,&#$!&4'0&.34 ,',4'4 -0,134',4-,.!'&4 ,',4!&4 1'$0%44 '4-0,13-4.4)440&,4 0!.',-4 !$4 &0%,4  4 -,!4 -4 '$$'2-4 '%%&!&4 .4 . 4 -'0. 2-.4 ',&,4'4-!4-.!'&44&4-!4),$44. &4$'&4. 42-.4$!&4'4-!4-.!'&44 &',. 4  4 -.44 !-.&4'4 4 .4.'4 . 4 .,04)'!&.4'4 !&&!&4. &4 '&.!&0!&4$'&4. 42-.4$!&4'4-!4-.!'&4&',. 4  4-.44!-/&4'4  4 .4 .'4 . 4 &',. 2-.4 ',&,4 '4 -!4 ),$4 4 &4 . 4 &',. 2-.4 ',&,4 '4 . 4 -'0. 2-.4*0,.,4'4-!4-.!'&44. &4$1!&4 -!42-.4 $!&4&',. 4  4-.4 $'&4. 4&',. 4$!&4'4-!4),$444!-.&4'4 4. &4'&.!&0!&4$'&4-!4 &',. 4$!&4&',. 4  4-.44!-.&4'4 4.4.'44)'!&.4'4!&.,-.!'&42!. 4. 4 -.4$!&4 '4. 4&',. 2-.4*0,.,4'4. 4 -'0. 2-.4 +0,.,4 '4 -!4-.!'&44. &4 $1!&4-!4&',. 4$!&4-'0. 4 42-.4$'&4-!4-.4$!&44!-.&4'4   4.4 .'4. 4-'0. -.4',&,4'4 -!4&',. 2-.4 *0,.,4'4. 4 -'0. 2-.4 *0,.,4. &4 -'0. 4  42-.4$'&4. 4-'0. 4$!&4'4-!4&',. 2-.4*0,.,4'4. 4-'0. 2-.4 *0,.,44!-.&4'4   4.4.'4. 4.,04)'!&.4'4!&&!&4  4)',.!'&4'4-.!'&44 .'2&- !)44 &',. 4,&4 4-.4 2%4,&#$!&4 '0&.34 2- !&.'&4 $-'4 !&44 )',.!'&4'4),$44-4- '2&4'&4,&#$!&4'0&.34 ,',4'4 -0,134',4-,.!'&4,',4!&4 1'$0%44'4-0,13-4.4 )440&,4 0!.',-4 !$4 &0%,4  4 -,!4 -4 '$$'2-4 '%%&!&4 .4 . 4 -'0. 2-.4 ',&,4'4-!4-.!'&44&4-!4),$44. &4$'&4. 42-.4$!&4'4-!4-.!'&44 &',. 4  4-.44!-.&4'4   4.4.'4. 4&',. 2-.4',&,4'4-!4),$44 &4. 4&',. 2-.4',&,4'4. 4-'0. 2-.4*0,.,4(4-!4-.!'&44. &4$1!&4-!4 2-.4$!&4&',. 4  -.4$'&4. 4&',. 4$!&4'4-!4),$444!-.&4'4 4 .4. &4'&.!&0!&4$'&4-!4&',. 4$!&4&',. 4  4-.44!-.&4'4 4.4 .'44)'!&.4'4!&.,-.!'&42!. 4. 42-.4$!&4'4. 4&',. -.4*0,.,4'4. 4-'0. 2-.4 *0,.,4'4 -!4 -.!'&44&4. 4.,04)'!&.4'4!&&!&4. &4'&.!&0!&4$'&4-!4 &',. 4$!&4 &',. 4  4-.44 !-.&4'4  4 .4 . &4'&.!&0!&4$'&4-!4 &',. 4$!&4&',. 4 -.44!-.&4'4 4 4.4.'4. 4&.,4'4-!4-.!'&44&4 . 4&',. -.4',&,4'4-!4),$44. &4-'0. 4 4 42-.4$'&4. 4-.4$!&4'4 -!4),$444!-.&4'4 4. &4'&.!&0!&4$'&4-!4-.4$!&4-'0. 4  4 2-.44!-.&4'44.4.'44)'!&.4'4!&.,-.!'&42!. 4. 4),'".4-'0. 4$!&4'4 -!4 &',. -.4*0,.,4'4 . 4 -'0. 2-.4 *0,.,4. &4$1!&4-!4 -.4$!&4 -'0. 4 Page 132 of 354   4$'&4,!4,'0. 4$!&4&4. 4,.+$34)+'".!'&4. +'44!,.&4 '4  4 .4.'4 . 4 ,'0. 2,.4'+&+4'4 . 4 &'+. ,.4 *0+.+4'4 . 4,'0. 2,.4 *0+.+4'4 ,!4,.!'&4 4. &4&'+. 4 ,.4$'&4. 42,.4$!&4'4,!4&'+. ,.4*0+.+4 '4. 4,'0. 2,.4*0+.+44!,.&4'4  4.4.'4. 4)'!&.4'4!&&!& 4   6 4)'+.!'&4'4,.!'&4 4.'2&, !)4 4&'+. 4+&4 4,.42 % 4+&#$!&4 '0&.342, !&.'&4$,'4!&44 )'+.!'&4'4)+$44,4, '2&4'&4+&#$!&4'0&.34 +'+4'4 ,0+134 '+4 ,+.!'&4+'+4 !&41'$0%4 4 '4,0+13,4.4)4 4 0&+4 0!.'+,4 !$4 &0%+4   4 ,+!4 ,4 '$$'2,4 '%%&!&4.4 . 4 ,'0. 2,.4 '+&+4'4,!4,.!'&4 4&4,!4)+$44. &4$'&4. 4,'0. 4$!&4'4,!4,.!'&4 4 &4. 4,'0. 4$!&4'4,!4)+$44&'+. 4 4,.44!,.&4'4 4.4.'4. 4 ,'0. 2,.4'+&+4'4. 4,'0. ,.4*0+.+4'4. 4,'0. 2,.4*0+.+4'4,!4,.!'&4 4 &4. 4.+04)'!&.4'4!&&!&4. &4$1!&4,!4,'0. 4$!&4&'+. 4 4,.4$'&4 . 42,.4$!&4'4,!4,'0. ,.4*0+.+4'4/ 4,'0. 2,.4*0+.+44!,.&4'4  4 .4.'4 . 4 &'+. 2,.4'+&+4'4,!4 ,'0. ,.4 *0+.+4'4 . 4 ,'0. 2,.4*0+.+4 . &4 &'+. 4    4 ,.4 $'&4 . 4 &'+. 4 $!&4 '4 ,!4 ,'0. ,.4 *0+.+4 '4 . 4 ,'0. 2,.4*0+.+4&4. 4 ,.+$34)+'".!'&4. +'44!,.&4'4  4.4.'44 )'!&.4'4!&.+,.!'&42!. 4. 4,.4 $!&4'4,!4)+$44. &4,'0. 4  42,.4 $'&4. 4,.4 $!&4'4,!4 )+$444!,.&4'4   4.4 . &4'&.!&0!&4$'&4 ,!4,.4 $!&4 ,'0. 4 42,.44 !,.&4'4  4 .4.'4. 4,'0. ,.4'+&+4'4 ,!4)+$44&4. 4,'0. ,.4'+&+4'4. 4,'0. 2,.4*0+.+4'4,!4,.!'&4. &4 ,'0. 4 4 2,.4$'&4 . 4,'0. 4 $!&4'4. 4 ,'0. 2,.4*0+.+4'4 ,!4,.!'&44 !-.&4(4 4.4.'4. 4)'!&.4'4!&&!& 4   6 4)'+.!'&4'4,.!'&4 4.'2&, !)44&'+. 4+&4 4,.4$,'4!&4)+$44 ,4, '2&4'&4+&#$!&4'0&.34+'+4'4,0+134 0&+40!.'+,4 !$4&0%+4  4 ,+!4 ,4 '$$'2,4 . 4 ,'0. 2,.4 *0+.+4 '4 . 4 ,'0. 2,.4 *0+.+4 ,.!'&4 4 .'2&, !)44&'+. 4+&4 4,.42%4+&#$!&4'0&.342, !&.'& 4   6 $ 6*10%3 /056*"6 0&*)6 6*3)/%&,66*.0%6)# 6 6/06!(1/&2 6+60%06-*.0&*)6 &)0 ./ 0&)#63&0%6.&&0& /6'*.06( .6*) 6/6 ,&0 6&)64%&&06 Page 133 of 354 ) ,%!,,&, , !!+"!,  #$)( , !,, ',%!,,)*,() , ,, , ,,                      Page 134 of 354 1 Jeff Adams From:Jacob Gonzalez Sent:Thursday, December 2, 2021 2:51 PM To:Jeff Adams Cc:Rick White Subject:FW: Farm 2005, LLC - 130 acres FYI–ZonecorrectionrequestonFarm2005property. JacobB.Gonzalez|PlanningManager Community&EconomicDevelopment 525N.3rdAvenue|Pasco,WA99301 (509) 545Ͳ3441|gonzalezjb@pascoͲwa.gov ThisemailandyourresponseareconsideredapublicrecordandwillbesubjecttodisclosureunderWashington’sPublicRecordsAct. From:DaveSwisher<dave@daveswisher.com> Sent:Thursday,December2,20212:50PM To:JacobGonzalez<gonzalezjb@pascoͲwa.gov> Cc:Stevewest<sjwest33@hotmail.com> Subject:Farm2005,LLCͲ130acres [NOTICE:ThismessageoriginatedoutsideofCityofPascoͲͲDONOTCLICKonlinksoropenattachmentsunlessyouare surethecontentissafe.] HiJacob ItlooksthezoningofR12wasamistakeontheannexationletterthatisbeingsentouttothepublic.Wewouldlikethe prescribedzoningtobeR1ratherthanR12aswediscussedpreviously Wearetotallyopenasbeforeregardinglessdensityneartheairportandmoredensetowardstheschoolsandwillmake surethedevelopmentadherestothat.TheR1zoningwillgiveusalotmoreflexibilityinachievingthatgoal. Ireallyappreciateitifyoucouldupdatetheletterbeforeitgetssentoutandifitalreadyhasbeensentouttoinclude thisletterintherecordsowecangetitupdatedassoonaspossible.Hopefully,ifitisthelatterwewouldliketomake ourpreliminarylayoutaccordingtoR1andrunitparallelcourseifitinvolvesalengthyprocesstochange.Iwouldhate tobebehindtheeightballsotospeakfromaclericalerror. Thanksatonfortakingthecall, Page 135 of 354 2 DaveSwisher,Partner 2005Farm,LLC CC:SteveWest Page 136 of 354 1 Jeff Adams From:Buck Taft <bucktaft@portofpasco.org> Sent:Monday, December 13, 2021 10:52 AM To:Andy Kottkamp; Jeff Adams Subject:RE: Master File #ZD 2021-003 [NOTICE:ThismessageoriginatedoutsideofCityofPascoͲͲDONOTCLICKonlinksoropenattachmentsunlessyouare surethecontentissafe.] Andy,  Iapologizefortheerrorbutthispropertyisinzone4notzone2.  Zone4–OuterApproach/DepartureZone.Prohibitedlanduseswithinthiszoneare:placesofpublicassemblysuchas churches,exceptexistingchurchesshallbepermittedtoexpand,schools(KͲ12),hospitals,shoppingcentersandother useswithsimilarconcentrationsofpersons.ResidentialdensityislimitedtoRSͲ20exceptsouthofIͲ182.Allnew residentialdevelopmentmustincludethedisclosurestatementinPMC25.190.100onplats,shortplatsandbindingsite plans.  Thesamestatementisrequiredsonochangeinthatarea.Sorryfortheconfusion.  Buck Taft Tri-Cities Airport Airport Director  From:AndyKottkamp<andy@wenatcheelaw.com> Sent:Monday,December13,202110:20AM To:BuckTaft<bucktaft@portofpasco.org>;'JeffAdams'<ADAMSJ@pascoͲwa.gov> Subject:RE:MasterFile#ZD2021Ͳ003  Received. Thank you  Andrew Kottkamp City of Pasco Hearing Examiner 435 Orondo Ave. P.O. Box 1667 Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509) 667-8667 www.wenatcheelaw.com  From: Buck Taft [mailto:bucktaft@portofpasco.org] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2021 10:00 AM To: Jeff Adams Cc: andy@wenatcheelaw.com Subject: RE: Master File #ZD 2021-003  Jeff, You don't often get email from bucktaft@portofpasco.org. Learn why this is important Page 137 of 354 2  Sinceyoudonotdealwithlandinthesezonesthatoften,IwantedtohighlighttherequirementsofZone2.Thisisfrom theCityofPascoMunicipalCodeChapter25.190.Anyquestionsjustask.   Zone2–InnerApproach/DepartureZone.Prohibitedlanduseswithinthiszoneare:residences,exceptresidentialinfill developmentispermittedsouthofIͲ182;placesofpublicassemblysuchaschurches,schools(KͲ12),colleges,hospitals; highͲdensityoffice,retailorservicebuildings;shoppingcentersandotheruseswithsimilarconcentrationsofpersons. Productionofasphaltpavingandroofingmaterialsorrockcrushingarealsoprohibited.Fuelstoragefacilitiesorthe storageoruseofsignificantamountsofmaterialswhichareexplosive,flammable,toxic,corrosive,orotherwiseexhibit hazardouscharacteristicsshallnotbelocatedwithintheinnerapproach/departurezone.Hazardouswildlifeattractants, includingwastedisposaloperations,watermanagementandstormwaterfacilitieswithaboveͲgroundwaterstorage, andmanmadewetlands,shallnotbeallowedwithintheinnerapproach/departurezone.Allnewinfillresidential developmentmustincludethedisclosurestatementinPMC25.190.100onplats,shortplatsandbindingsiteplans.  PMCStatement  Toallextentspossible,propertyownersandpotentialpropertybuyersshouldbemadeawareofthefollowing disclosure.Thedisclosurestatementshallbelistedonallapprovedsubdivisionplats,shortplatsandbindingsiteplans withinanyoftheidentifiedzonesinPMC25.190.060or25.190.090.  “Propertywithinthis(plat/shortplatorbindingsiteplan)maybesubjecttovaryingnoiselevelsandvibrationsdueto proximitytotheTriͲCitiesAirport.Propertiesneartheairportmaybelocatedwithinheightanduserestrictionzonesas describedandillustratedbyfederalstandardsandregulationsandtheCityofPascoZoningRegulations.Thereisthe potentialthatstandardflightpatternswillresultinaircraftpassingoverthepropertiesatlowaltitudesandduringall hoursoftheday.Futureairportexpansionincludingrunwayextensionsmayimpactthesizeandnumberofaircraft utilizingtheairport.Developmentsneartheairportshouldassumethatatanygiventimetherewillbesomeimpact fromairtraffic.”[Ord.4111§2,2013;Code1970§25.81.120.]   Buck Taft Tri-Cities Airport Airport Director  From:JeffAdams<ADAMSJ@pascoͲwa.gov> Sent:Friday,December10,20215:00PM To:BuckTaft<bucktaft@portofpasco.org> Cc:andy@wenatcheelaw.com Subject:FW:MasterFile#ZD2021Ͳ003  ThanksBuck—  IwillforwardthistoourHearingExaminerforinclusionintherecordandplaceacopyinourfiles.  AsanFYI:Acorrectednoticeforthisprojecthasbeenmailedout(asperattachedZD2021Ͳ00301CorrectedRadius NoticeOlberding&Farm2005)revisingtheproposedzoningforsaidparcelatApplicant’srequest.  Thanks!  Jeff  Page 138 of 354 3  Jeffrey B. Adams  Associate Planner 525 N. 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 (509) 545-3441 adamsj@pasco-wa.gov http://www.pascoͲwa.gov/   From:BuckTaft<bucktaft@portofpasco.org> Sent:Friday,December10,20214:01PM To:JeffAdams<ADAMSJ@pascoͲwa.gov> Subject:MaterFile#ZD2021Ͳ003  [NOTICE:ThismessageoriginatedoutsideofCityofPascoͲͲDONOTCLICKonlinksoropenattachmentsunlessyouare surethecontentissafe.] Jeff,  Iknowwearealittlelate,butIgotthisonthedayofthehearingandwhilepreparingmycommenttodayrealizedthat theyweredueonthe8th.  Myonlycommentisinregardtoparcel#114250016  IhaveattachedtheavigationeasementthatgoeswiththatparcelasitisinWSDOTSafetyCompatibilityZone4.  Ifyouhaveanyadditionalquestionspleaseletmeknow.  Buck Taft Airport Director Tri-Cities Airport   You don't often get email from bucktaft@portofpasco.org. Learn why this is important Page 139 of 354 &&*$:)7=0&=*,*/'= /=2%'2$6=70=  = =2.%/=73)"+=(%2%!<="0/&*2.=7(7=/07)&)"7*0/=;6=6%/7=!<=.*,=0/=3*$<=/82<=  =70 =7(%= 0;/%26=0&=7(%=14"%-6=;*7(*/= =&%%7=0&=7(%=130106%$=6)7%= (%=77"(%$=07*&)"7*0/=*67=/$=07)"%=0&=8!-)"=%2)/'=5%=70=!%=86%$=6==3%&%2%/"%= 6=70=;(7=;6= 6%/7=/$=70=;(0.=5%"%):%$=7(%=/07*&)#7*0/= *:%/=8/$%5=.<=(/$=/$=0&&*#*-=6*'/795%=7()6=$<=0&=/82<= = Page 140 of 354  555  55 5   55 55  5  5  5 5 5D4-DND41N '-C/>N5DKN>F=/68NI688N4>80N-N 'F.86/N"1-@6=3N%-CD1@N!681N&+N  N6=ND41N6DKN>F=/68N 4-;.1@CN'-C/>N6DKN"-88N N&N@0NH1N-DND41N 4>G@N>2NN ?; N%>=0-KN #-=F-@KNND>N/>=C601@N-==1J6=3ND41N2>88>I6=3N 01C/@6.10N?@>?1@DKND> D41N6DKN>2N'-C/>NC11N-DD-/410N(1H6C10N J46.6DNN<-?N-=0  5 5 5D4-DND41N'-C/>N"1-@6=3N J-;6=1@NI688N4>80N-N?F.96/N41-@6=3N-DNN? ;N *10=1C0-KN!1.@F-@KNNND>N/>=C601@ND41N1CD-.86C4;1=DN>2NL>=6=3N%-CD1@N !5:1N,N  2>AND41NF=6=/>A?>@-D10N?@>?1@EKN601=D62510N.18>IN6=ND41N1H1=DNCF/4N?@>?1BEKN6CN-==1J10 D>ND41N5DKN>2N'-C/>N N(1D-68NGC6=1CCN() N$>I 1=C6DKN(1C601=D6-8N( N$>I 1=C6DK (1C601=D6-8 N -=0N( N%106F; 1=C6DKN (1C601=D6-8NM>=6=3N -A1N.16=3N />=C601@10N 2>@ND41 2>88>I6=3N01C/@6.10N?@>?1ADKND>NE41N 6DKN>2N'-C/>NC11N-EE-/410N(1H6C10N J46.6ENN<-? !)!.%5 *1$*)5-??@>J6;-D18KN N-/@1CN>2N8-=0N=>@D4N>2NG@=CN(>-0N.1DI11=N(>-0NN -=0N >=H1=D6>=N@6H1N ,!$#$5 *1$*)5 / "&5 3-4"/5("5  /"05    ## ## #  ###"##  #   ###"##  #   ###"##  #   ###"## #   ###"##  #   # # # !!###  #   # # # !!###  #   ### #   # ##  # +2'5   5 5  5 5 5  5 D4-DNE41KN <-KN-??1-@N-=0N ?A1C1=DN-=KN >.71/D6>=CN>@NCG??>@EN2>@ND41N?@>?>C10N-==1J-E6>=N !>@N-006D6>=-8N5=2>@<-D6>=N?81-C1N/>=E-/DN D41N '-C/>N 6EKN'8-==1AN#122N0-;CN-DNN N Page 141 of 354 R-1R-3C-1R-1R-3RS-20R-1CITY LIMITSCITY LIMITSROAD 68CLARK RDZone 4Zone 1Zone 2Zone 2Zone 3Zone 3Urban Growth BoundaryUrbanGrowthBoundaryUrban Growth Boundary1143300481143300471143300461143300451143300441143300431143300421143300411143300311142500160 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500FeetLegendZoneC-1R-1R-3RS-20City LimitsAirport ZonesZone 1Zone 2Zone 3Zone 4UGA 2021Item: Olberding & Farm 2005 AnnexationApplicants: Allen & Cheryl Olberding & Steve West/Farm 2005File #: ANX 2021-003; ZD 2021-003Revised"Exhibit A"Page 142 of 354 /.?233?%4<?344?=%1? 0,7.%?:423? 2.?,,?? --3?2?130?:?? )?,,?%2$?2?130?:? ? 1024?0 ?130 10?0;??130?:?? ,%3#?.?064 ?2&92$:+?,/?130?:?? 274#?3%.130/?2%92$:+?,/?130?:?? "2<?,?0"72/?)2?,012?2?130?:? ? -?34#-??)&.?"?)2?"0/=,=?,012?2?130?:?? 2%64/<?.?28=.82%,,0 ?,012?2?130?:?? 423?.+&2//?,012?2?130?:?? 2%/?)??,;??3$:?,012?2?130?:?? )&.?3%2+?47;?8,,0"?,/?130?:? ?  2/?2??341#/&?)?#2//=?8,,0"?,/?130?:?? 341#/??97"$/?7,-0"?,/?130?:?? 2 ,?,7/?8,,0"?,/?130?:?? )33&?4923 ?7,,0"?,/?130?:? ? +2,?.?2<3?4,?2%92#:+?,/?130?:?? ,;?/??</?1?"02&/#0<?2&92$:+?,/?130?:? ? &0,?20"0&64&?:&,4?,/?130?:? ? :&,,&.??/43#?.022%30/?:%,4?,/?130?:?? +4#<??1423 ?,012?2?130?:?? +4$2</?0/,?,012?2?130?:?? =//??/",?.?#2//=?-012?2?130?:?? 2&/?,? ,<//?4,?,012?2?130?:? ? "2264???)33'?.?.%3 ?,012?2?130?:?? ).3?.?34&/?47;?,012?2?130?:?? 98?#?,77 ?1/4#2?,/?130?:? ? )//% 2?3#22?4,?1/4#2?,/?130?:?? .273?#?3#0:,42 ?1/4#2?,/?130?:? ? /48?+82 ?1/4#2?,/?130?:?? 2?1??3/2?,?,&3&/"2 ?:&,4?,/?130?:?? ,%30/??/4#/&,?024&=?:&,4?,/?130?:?? 2</?1?74$4?47;?20+4?,/?130?:?? 64&83?120125<?./"./4?,,?3?.07/4&/?2&"?4?+//:&+?:?? ,:2/?(?2<.<2?4-?,012?2?130?:?? 9%???300/?8+?,09,,?20+4?-/?130?:?? $/,2?,07&3?/:,,?4,?20+4?,/?130?:?? %4<?0 ?130 10?0;??130?:?? 130?3#00,?%342&4?/0??:?,:&3?34?130?:?? )03?)??9/33?9?.02 &/?20+203?,/?130?:? ? +9&/?82,$2?48;?72,:?,/?130?:?? 2%20?3420??&2.?.?3420 ?20+203?,/?130?:?? ,;???20/?+2.//?72,:?,/?130?:?? 3#,<?//?/30,#2?"02"?:3$&/"40/?>?2&#,/?:?? 20/?2: 02?48;?20+203?,/?130?:?? *0#/?)??3#,<?/?!264%?72,:?,/?130?:?? <&2??2&20?3%,92%0 ?.2,,?,/?130?:?? *0/5#/??/0.%?72/?82,:?,/?130?:? ? *.3?/?"2=?20+203?,/?130?:?? Page 143 of 354 &-0<<<,/<+,9<0(-<&/< <(-.-(</<.0-<5<  < /-/1<--1< <(-.-(</<.0-<5<  < &-0<<<5!1,7<+<0(,< <(-.-(</<.0-<5<  < /2,<-,9(9<!;:< <(-.-(</<.0-<5<  < 1/0<(</,1< <(-.-(</<.0-<5<  < '7(/<4,.-/1< <2/(5<(,<.0-<5<  < 4 <<<(<.(+/<  <+!((<.-!,1</<0<+!((</'<5<  < ,/7<+<<+/ 19<<1-//0< <+/7 ((<(,<.0-<5<  < 201!,<<</!<(<(-,19< <+/7!((<(,<.0-<5<  < -/7</!!,< <+ 00!-,</!</<.0-<5<  < 7(,<<(-,< <+!00!-,</!</<.0-<5<  < + ((<'<+/!< <+ 00!-,</!</<.0-<5<  < (,</</1,< <+!00!-,</ </<.0-<5<  < 5/</-),<'-<&/< <+!00 -,</!</<.0-<5< < ,/5<</-0</!(< <+!00!-,</"</<.0-<5< < -/<(<++3// ,< <+/7!((<(,<.0-<5<  < 4!/!,!</,,9< <+/7!)(<(,<.0-<5<  < 4!,<<+/()<+/)< <50-2(<(,<.0-<5< < &-,1,<<<,(<&</--'0< <50-2(<),<.0-<5< < (,<&<'-5(0'!<126< <5<<1<1<',,5$'<5<< &-0.<<</-,<</73/,< <50-2(<(,<.0-<5< < .!(( .<<<0,,<(</!11!,< <501.-/1<(,<.0-<5<  < (-7<.'/< <<5 ,5/<(,<',,5#'<5< < -,(<<<.7<'<5/0<1/2010< <+ 00!-,</$</<.0-<5< < +( 00<,,<+!1()< <+ 00!-,</ </<.0-<5<  < /-0,,<(</,19 ,0< <+!00 -,</!</<.0-<5<  < 1/#9<+3,-9</+!/9< <+!00 -,</ </<.0-<5<  < /(-0<+2,-9< <+ 00!-,</ </<.0-<5<  < 1/4-/<--< <501.-/1<(,<.0-<5<  < -,(<)<</+,<++0< <0<<./<0<',,5!'<5< < 5/<.<<+!(<(<(//< <---<(,<.0-<5<  < 1/-5/!< ,401+,10<*(<.-<-6<  <!</-/<5< < ,7/<+9< <+!00!-,</!</<.0-<5<   < &-0</+-0<-,9(9<136< <+!00!-,</ </<.0-<5<   < /(-0<(4/-<126< <+ 00!-,</ </<.0-<5<   < ',,1<-/<.!(*!.0< <+ 00!-,</!</<.0-<5<   < &+0<+/-,<<+-,!<-//<(!< <+!00 -,</!</<.0-<5<  < (3/7,<<<-3/1,7<!/$< <+!00 -,</!</<.0-<5<  < 5/!1<( 4 ,<1/201< <&-02</<.0-<5<  < 1/<+<-. ',0< <0+/<),<.0-<5<  < /+-,<<4//!< ;;< <0+/<(,<.0-<5<  < 70,!</+-0<1(< <0+/<(,<.0-<5<  < &3,<(<<+/!0-(<29+,<  <0+/<(,<.0-<5<  < 01.,<1<</--'<0</%01< <0+/<(,<.0-<5<  < ("/<7<3 ((,< <+ 00!-,</!</<.0-<5<   < +!3(<<-/-9-< <+%00 -,</!</<.0-<5<   < (,<01(<4((<4/0< <+!00!-,</ </<.0-<5<   < '08<</!,/< <+!00!-,</ </<.0-<5<   < /!1</-/!29< </-/1<57,</<.0-<5<  < Page 144 of 354 !(,5& '(5$+('5-/25  5+(+-513'5+5 ),(515   5 & $$5355#$ $5 #,5 5)+#135)$5 -/$$(&5-'5  5 ,15 -(&&35-/25  5+(+-513'5+5 ),(515   5 #-3555/'5,5!(5  5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 , '355+''(5&5(& '/45  5+(+-513'5+5 ),(515   5 1,-('5(1&'5  5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 $/,555+ ,- '551 -5  5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 +'50('0 $35-$5  515&+ 5,-5 ),(515   5 +($ (55&+ 5&$'5 45-(05 5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 !(,/5,5)(3'-+5  55-505  5 $,$ 5!55$3 5&35+(-',,5!+5  5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 )''35"5',('5  5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 $(+ 55$35  5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 "/'5/ $+5,$(5  5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 '-('355$$,5$+5   5,$-5$$,5 ),(515  5 $2'+5& '(+& +45-/25  530 15$'5 ),(515  5  5 $#+5  5$$- '5+5 ),(515  5 0 5(+$$55,+ '5' ($50 $5  530 15$'5 ),(515  5 - &(-355#(+ '5$3''5$&'-,5  5('5+(#5%'5 ),(515  5 "(,/5+5  5,%-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 3+('5#5/,#35  5,%-5$$,5 ),(515  5 ,(-.55)3$$ ,55&-1,5  5,$-5$$,5+5 ),(515  5 3(' */ +(45  5,$-5$$,5 ),(515  5 ,0''5+5&('-(&+35  5+((#5+ 0+5-5 ),(515  5 0  55" %$5+5+0,5  5 +((#5+ 0+5-5 ),(515  5 &+ ,,5)55,$0(+5(5&" 5  5+((#5+ 0+5-5 ),(515  5 &&'/$5&+- '450$5  5+((#5+ 0+5-5 ),(515  5 1,-+55,$35,-'5  5-',5+5 ),(515   5 ' (5+3,5&-5-/25  5-',5+5 ),(515  5 #++355++ 5,- '5  5-',5+5 ),(515   5 "(,/555!(,$3'55$,,5  5-',5+5 ),(515  5 & $505%('5-$5  5&% -5$'5 ),(515   5 &+ 5+0$(5 %5-/25  5'(# '5)( '-5+5 ),(515  5 (+-(50$,*/45"+5  5, ('5%'5 ),(515   5 )+(5($(5$(+,5  5(+ '-5+5 ),(515   5 )-+  5+/-5&+ %5  5, ('5%'5 ),(515   5 (% 05-5('4$45  5&$ -5$'5 ),(515   5 ,-5&5(''$$35  55+5&(/'- '5+5 '-('5 .3515   5 ' $55-+5&+ 5% 5  5(+ '-5+5 ),(515   5 !('5,-)('5&+- '45  5(+ '-5+5 ),(515   5 -+ 4545((5  5(+ '-5+5 ),(515   5 & $50 55&+ '5"'5 &&#5 5(+ '-5+5 ),(515   5 $/ 5$(4'(5  5(+ '-5+5 ),(515   5 + -.'35'5$0+(5-/25  5(+ '-5+5 ),(515   5 +'('55+ -5+*/ ,-5  5(+ '-5+5 ),(515   5 $ 55 ,#5-$5  5(+ ' -5+5 ),(515   5 3'5(&,5$$5 5,15% +5)%5,-5 5 +&('5(+5  5 5)+()+- ,5%$5  5'15+'#$ '505,-5 5'5(+5   5 #''-55-+,,51 $$ &,5  5'5+(55 ),(515  5 Page 145 of 354 .+2%22$1+2%2%+.*2 ,%)+'22#2-12 %*222+),02#.##2 '&#222!&2.+)*2 )#*22)#0&2)%'&2 !,&2 2)12!)2 +,/2 &""2+'))*2 *)'&2"2'#2 *+(&22-"2.)+2 )'#&'2*()12 ,&2%&2 !,#'2%&2 !')22#,2+'))*2 #*)2+'))*2+,/2 $"22%$#2'$)&2 )%2 2##2 ##&22)0$2'#)&2 *2#&2%&%&+2##2  2##  2)')+2)2 (*'2.2   2  2-02)2 (*'2.2   2  2)'2 2 (*'2.2   2  2)'2 2 (*'2.2   2  2)'2 2 (*'2.2   2  22*,*+)2)2 "&&."2.2   2  2*&2)2 (*'2.2   2  2",2+)#2 (*'2.2   2  2",2+)#2 (*'2.2   2  2.2'+-2*+2 (*'2.2    2  2%'')2)2 (*'2.2   2  2)')+22)2 (*'2.2    2  2#2)*+2)2 (*'2.2   2 2.2'&&-##2*+2 (*'2.2   2  2.2'.''2)2 (*'2.2  2 2&2)'22 (*'2.2   2 2#-&)2+2 (*'2.2   2  22.*)2(".02 "&&."2.2   2  2)2)2 (*'2.2  2 Page 146 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 16, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: *Q Ordinance - Affinity and Hydro at Broadmoor Apartments Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUD 2021-001) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance Exhibit A - Hearing Examiner PUD Recommendation Exhibit B - Report to Hearing Examiner (January 12, 2022) II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. _____, rezoning Lot 3 of the Broadmoor Parcel Segregation from R-T to R-4/PUD, and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On January 12, 2022, the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing to consider a request to establish a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District on one - parcel, comprising approximately 19 acres located south of Burns Road and 2,600 feet west of Broadmoor Blvd from R-T (Residential Transition) to R-4/PUD (High-Density Residential / Planned Unit Development). Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the application for a PUD, and the commensurate rezone fro m R-T (Residential Transition) to R-4/PUD (High-Density Residential / Planned Unit Development). V. DISCUSSION: Page 147 of 354 The site is within the Broadmoor Planning Area situated towards the Northwest City Limits and generally bound by Interstate I-182, Broadmoor Blvd (Road 100), Burns Road, and the Columbia River. The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan specifies the Broadmoor Area for its development potential that will occur through specific design and development standards that will incorporate a mix of housing, retail, commercial and open space. The 2018 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates this site with three Land Uses: Open Space and Park, Office, and Mixed-Use Regional. Under the existing R-T zoning destination, the proposed project and request for a Planned Unit Development are not possible. The R-4/PUD will accommodate the proposed project. The proposed project includes the construction of up to 240 residential apartment units and 170 attached senior apartment units. The proposal will also include approximately 149,360 square feet of dedicated open space, trails and gathering areas for residents. Staff recommends concurrence with the Hearing Examiner recommendation. Page 148 of 354 Ordinance – Rezone PUD 2021-001 - 1 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: City of Pasco, Washington WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco, Washington Attn: City Clerk 525 North 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 ____________________________________________________________________________ ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON REZONING LOT 3 OF THE BROADMOOR PARCEL SEGREGATION, RECORD 31932625, AND IS WITHIN A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST ¼ OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST W.M. IN THE CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON (PARCEL NO. 115210033) FROM R-T TO R-4/PUD. WHEREAS, the applicant seeks to rezone a parcel in concurrence with a Planned Unit Development (PUD, owned by applicant and located south of Burns Road, approximately 2,600 ft east of Broadmoor Blvd. in Pasco, WA; and WHEREAS, a complete application and application for a PUD zoning establishment meeting the requirements of PMC 25.140 and 25.210.030 was received by the City and, after notice was issued under PMC 25.210.040, an open record hearing was conducted by the Pasco Hearing Examiner upon such petition on the 12th day of January 2022; and WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Applicant that: (a) the PUD district development will be compatible with nearby developments and uses; (b) peripheral treatment ensures proper transition between PUD uses and nearby external uses and developments; (c) the development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the PUD district; and (d) the public health, safety and welfare have been served, the Hearing Examiner developed findings and conclusions of law in accordance with PMC 25.140.090(5), attached hereto as Exhibit A, which are hereby adopted by City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Page 149 of 354 Ordinance – Rezone PUD 2021-001 - 2 Section 1. The Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from R-T (Residential Transition) to R-4/PUD (High-density Residential / Planned Unit Development) for the real property as shown in Exhibit B attached hereto and described as follows: Lot 3 of the Broadmoor Parcel Segregation, record 31932625, and is within a portion of the Northeast ¼ of Section 7, Township 09 North, Range 29 East W.M. in the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington. Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcel 115210033. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ____ day of ________, 2022. Blanche Barajas Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Published ___________________________ Page 150 of 354 DENT RdSANDIFUR PkwyBROADMOOR BlvdVINCENZO DrRoad 119SPRINGERLnMATHE W S R d CAM Rd GRANDVIEW DrCOVENTRY LnEXETER LnSE A H A W K C t CADBORO DrNorfolk Dr TALON Ct ARROW SHELF Dr DURHAM Dr WOODS MA N Dr MI A L n Fletcher Rd TYEE Dr KENT Pl CHESHIRE Ct KETA Dr ROAD 92MAJESTIA Ln NOTTINGHAM Dr ROAD 90SILVERBRIGHT Dr MIDLAND LnDUNSMUIR Dr BRIDGER Ct WELLINGTON Dr BEMAN R d BEDFORD StBUCKINGHAM Dr TIGUE CtCHINOOK Ct COHO Ct DUNBARTONAveBLACKHAWK Ct COTSWOLDLnKENTLnALDRIDGE Ct LANDON Ct SOPHIE RAE Ct DURHAM Ct OUTLET DrNOCKINGPOINT RdKOKANEE DrEAGLE CREST Dr RUVEN St NORFOLK Dr BURNS Rd SOMERSET LnEASTON Dr WHETSTONE DrBURNS Rd E I 1 8 2 T O BROADMOOR R A M P I-182 E ST THOMAS DrS BROADMOOR TOI 182RAMP W W I 1 8 2 T O BROA D M O O R RAMP BROAD M O O R T O I 1 8 2 R A M P EHARRIS Rd N BROA D M O O R T O I 182 R A M P W I-182 W Benton County WA, Maxar /Overview Map Item: Planned Unit Development Applicant: Affinity at Broadmoor, LLC File # PUD-PP 2021-001 0 1,000 2,000500 US Feet SITE EXHIBIT B Page 151 of 354 CITY OF PASCO HEARING EXAMINER IN THE MATTER OF )RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF )FACT,RECOMMENDED PUD 2021-001 )CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,AND Affinity and Hydro at Broadmoor )RECOMMENDED DECISION Apartments ) ) THIS MATTER having come on for hearing in front of the City of Pasco Hearing Examiner on January 12,2022,the Hearing Examiner having taken evidence hereby submits the following Recommended Findings of Fact,Conclusions of Law,and Decision and Conditions of Approval as follows: I.RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT 1.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Legal:Lot 3 of the Broadmoor Parcel Segregation,record 31932625,and is within a portion of the Northeast ‘Aof Section 7,Township 09 North,Range 29 East W.M.in the City of Pasco,Franklin County,Washington.(Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcel 115210033) General Location:The site is southwest of the intersection of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd. Propem Size:The site area consists of one parcel,approximately 19.33 acres (842,015 square feet).The proposal consists of two separate apartment buildings of 180,000 and 240,000. Applicant:Af?nity at Broadmoor,LLC,120 W.Cataldo Ave,Suite 100,Spokane, WA 99201. ACCESS:The property has public frontage access via Burns Road. UTILITIES:Municipal water and irrigation is available on Burns Road.The site will be served by a future trunk line as part of the Northwest Sewer LID.Said trunk line will be extended north from Harris Road and then east,allowing this development to connect via Burns Road.Electricity to be provided by Franklin Public Utility District (PUD). LAND USE AND ZONING:The site is currently vacant and zoned RT (Residential EAST:SOUTH:WEST:VacantVacantVacantRT;RT;RT;PUD 202 1-001BroadmoorPage1of10Page 152 of 354 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:The 2018 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates this site with three Land Uses:Open Space and Park,Office,and Mixed-Use Regional.The Open Space and Parks Land Use classi?cation is described as land where development will be restricted for park land,trails,and critical areas.The Office classi?cation is intended for professional office,personal services,and resources centers. Mixed-Use Regional is described as providing general retail operations,shops,grocery stores,residential and commercial mixed uses,including high-density residential,dining and entertainment uses.Per Table LU-1 (Land Use Designations and Criteria)of the Comprehensive Plan,the Open Space and Parks Land Use permits all zoning districts, including residential uses. The following 2018 Comprehensive Plan Policies are identified for this item: 6.1 Land Use Policy 1—B:Enhance the physical appearance of development within the community through land use regulations,design guidelines,and performance and maintenance standards including landscaping,screening,building facades,color, signs,and parking lot design and appearance. 6.2 Land Use Policy 2-A:Maintain sufficient land designated to accommodate residential,commercial,industrial,educational,public facility,and open space uses proximate to appropriate transportation and utility infrastructure. 6.3 Land Use Policy 4-B:Encourage in?ll and higher density uses within proximityto major travel corridors and public transportation service areas. 6.4 Housing Policy 1-A:Allow for a full range of housing including single family homes,townhouses,condominiums,apartments,and manufactured housing, accessory dwelling units,zero lot line,planned unit developments etc. 6.5 Housing Policy 3-A:Encourage innovative techniques in the design of residential neighborhoods and mixed-use areas to provide character and variety in the community. 6.6 Housing Policy 4-C:Increase housing supply and diversity through appropriate and ?exible development standards. 6.7 Economic Development Policy 4-B:Collaborate with public/private partners to create a masterplan vision of the waterfront,Broadmoor area,and other neighborhoods as necessary 6.8 Capital Facilities Policy 1—A:Systematically guide capital improvements consistent with the vision and plan of the community 6.9 Capital Facilities Policy 3-A:Assure land development proposals provide land and/or facilities or other mitigation measures to address impacts on traffic,parks, recreational facilities,schools,and pedestrian and bicycle trails. 6.10 Capital Facilities Policv5-B:Encourage use of existing natural features,open spaces, and appropriate excess right-of-way as an integral part of the community-wide park system. 6.11 Transportation Policy l—B:Require transportation and land use planning efforts and policy that meet the needs of the community and the objectives of this plan. project.A Mitigated Determination of Signi?cance (MDNS)was issued on October 20,2021.The applicant,Robert Ketner of Af?nity at Broadmoor,LLC,on behalf of BroadmoorProperties,LLC has submitted a Land Subdivision Application for a Planned UnitDevelopment(PUD)on a 19.33—acresite approximately 2,600 feet southwest of Burns RoadPUD2021-001BroadmoorPage2of10Page 153 of 354 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 16. and Broadmoor Blvd.The proposal is requesting the PUD which will result in the establishment of a PUD zone (R-4)which is not possible with the current Residential Transition (RT)zoning designation. The proposed project includes the construction of up to 240 residential apartment units and 170 attached senior apartment units on a currently vacant parcel.The proposal will also include approximately 149,360 square feet of dedicated open space,trails and gathering areas for residents. The site has frontage access on Burns Road,the project proposal includes the construction and expansion of city right-of-way to include Buckingham Drive and Road 108.Access to, and within the site are proposed via a driveway connection to Burns Road as well as driveways on/to Buckingham Drive and Road 108. The total site area is approximately 19.33 acres,is currently vacant and consists of hilly sand dunes.In general,the site is higher along the northern property line and lower along the southern property line.The site has been surveyed for Critical Area Habitat (shrubsteppe)and observed to be highly disturbed from recreational and construction activities,and debris throughout the property.A survey conducted by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and mapping performed by City staff confirm that the remaining suitable habitat is approximately 11.26 acres. The Future Land Use Map of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan designates the site as combination of Open Space /Parks,Office,and Mixed-Use Regional. The site was annexed into the City in 1982 (Ordinance No 2388)and assigned the Residential Transition (RT)zoning designation.In Pasco Municipal Code 25.25 .010,the RT district is intended to be applied or assigned to areas that are essentially undeveloped,however, ultimately intended for suburban or urban residential use. The site is within the Broadmoor Planning Area,an area ranging from 1,200 —1,600 acres situated towards the North West City Limits and generally bound by Interstate I-182, Broadmoor Blvd (Road 100),Burns Road and the Columbia River.Formal planning efforts for the “Broadmoor”area began in 2004 and continued through 2009 with the Planning Commission adopting the Broadmoor Sub-Area Concept Plan (October 15,2009).In 2017, the City issued a Determination of Signi?cance and request for comments to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)to evaluate the impacts of residential and commercial development in the Broadmoor area.That effort was paused in 2019 to allow the city to continue working on the periodic update of its Comprehensive Plan.On July 27,2021,the City issued a revised scoping notice and Determination of Significance to study two land-use alternatives based on the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan. incorporate a mix of housing,retail,commercial,open space and incorporate walkable andtransitfriendlydesign.On March 5,2020,the Pasco City Council passed Ordinance No 4483 for construction of anewsanitarysewertrunklineandothersewerinfrastructureimprovementstoservethePUD2021-001BroadmoorPage3of10Page 154 of 354 17. 18. Broadmoor area.The project(s)were consistent with the approval of a Local Improvement District (LID 151)in Resolution No 3932.This has been followed by increased development activities and proposals in the Broadmoor area.This includes preliminary plat applications indicating approximately 599 housing units to the north of the site (Northwest of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd)and approval of a rezone southeast of the site to C-1 (Retail Business District)of approximately 53.5 acres. The recent development activity in conjunction with improvements to utility infrastructure, and this application for a Planned Unit Development are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and established vision for the Broadmoor area. Rezone Criteria:The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC 25.210.030.The criteria are listed below as follows: 18.1 The date the existing zone became effective: 18.1.1 The current zoning classi?cation has been in place since the site was annexed into the City in 1982 (Ordinance No 2388). 18.2 The changed conditions,which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: 18.2.1 The City has planned for signi?cant growth on and near the surrounding area of the site.This includes the Broadmoor Sub-Area Concept Plan (2009),and the ongoing Broadmoor Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement,which the City issued a Scoping Notice and Determination of Signi?cant in July 2021.The Pasco City Council has adopted the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan which indicates the Broadmoor Area will accommodate upwards of 7,000 housing units 2,500 jobs.This has been supported by the 2020 Council approval of the Northwest Sewer LID and infrastructure improvements. 18.2.2 Development permits has been approved and/or underway in the immediate vicinity of the site that indicate an estimated 914 dwelling units.In August 2021,Council approved of request to rezone approximately 53.5 acres to C-1 (Retail Business District)southeast of the site. 18.3 Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health,safety, and general welfare: 18.3.1 The Planned Unit Development (PUD)application and proposed development are consistent with v the adopted 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan.The PUD would allow for a diverse range of The proposal is in conformance with,and,meets the intent of the PUDregulationsasstatedinPMC25.140.010 which are to result in thepreservationandenhancementofpublichealth,safety,welfare,andaccessofthecommunity,consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.PUD 2021-001BroadmoorPage4of10Page 155 of 354 18.4 The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property and the Comprehensive Plan: 18.4.1 The request for a Plarmed Unit Development,and the project proposal implement the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan,including various goals and policies of the Land Use,Housing,Economic Development and Capital Facilities Elements.Although the properties surrounding the site are currently vacant,development and permit activity have been approved including an estimated 914 dwelling units.The PUD application is consistent with,and the intent of the major land-use and infrastructure plans (Draft Transportation System Master Plan,Draft Comprehensive Sewer Plan). 18.5 The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted: 18.5.1 The current RT (Residential Transition)designation is intended to be applied or assigned to areas that are essentially undeveloped,however, ultimately intended for suburban or urban residential use.Without the approval of the Planned Unit Development /R-4 designation,the proposal is not possible.Without a rezone,the site will remain vacant, underutilized,and in non-conformance with community planning efforts. 18.6 The Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the property: 18.6.1 The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates this site with three Land Uses:Open Space and Park,Office,and Mixed-Use Regional.The Open Space and Parks Land Use classi?cation is described as land where development will be restricted for park land,trails,and critical areas.The Office classi?cation is intended for professional office,personal services,and resources centers.Mixed-Use Regional is described as providing general retail operations,shops,grocery stores,residential and commercial mixed uses,including high-density residential,dining and entertainment uses. Per Table LU-1 (Land Use Designations and Criteria)of the Comprehensive Plan,the Open Space and Parks Land Use permits all zoning districts,including residential uses. 18.7 Such other information as the Hearing Examiner requires. 19.The application for a Planned Unit Development,and rezone to the R-4 (High- Density Residential Zoning District)is consistent with,and meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan,PUD regulations and aligns with the intended vision for the Broadmoor area.The opportunity for additional housing options and diversity with open space amenities both support and implement the Broadmoor planning area 20.Public notice of this hearing was advertised in the Tri-City Herald on 12/26/2021 anddistributedtopropertyownerswithin300feetoftheprojectsiteon12/30/2021.21.The site was annexed into the City in 1982 (Ordinance No 2388)and assigned the ResidentialTransition(RT)zoning designation.PUD 202 1-00 1BroadmoorPage5of10Page 156 of 354 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36.37. The site is southwest of the intersection of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd and contains approximately 19.33 acres or 842,015 square feet. The applicant has requested to rezone the subject property (Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcel 115210033)from RT (Residential Transition)to R-4 (High-Density Residential Zoning District)in concurrence with a Planned Unit Development application. The RT (Residential Transition)district is intended to be applied or assigned to areas that are essentially undeveloped,however,ultimately intended for suburban or urban residential use. Planned Unit Developments are intended to allow for,and create opportunities for innovation,creativity,and ?exibility in land development as indicated in PMC 25.l40.010. Planned Unit Developments may be approved for a use or combination of uses permitted in PMC 25 .l40.020,and shall be enumerated in the ordinance establishing the district. The project associated with the Planned Unit Development includes the construction of 240 residential apartment units and 170 attached senior apartment units. The proposed (gross)density is 21.21 dwelling units per acre in conformance with the Density Requirements of PMC 25.140.080(4)for Mixed Residential/Commercial and High- Density Land Use. The project intends to record an age restrictive covenant on the Af?nity portion (170 dwellings)of the property and will apply for exemption of the Pasco School District Impact Fee per PMC 3.45.050(l). The project includes approximately 149,360 square feet of open space,representing 19.2%of the total site (net)complying with the minimum open space standards (15%)as determined in PMC 25.140.080(6). The project includes 735 on-site parking spaces within parking garages and surface lots. The project is anticipated to be constructed and occupied by 2025. The site has frontage access on Burns Road (to the north). The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan,Future Land Use designation for the site is:Open Space/Parks,O?ice,and Mixed—UseRegional. The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Broadmoor Area (1,200 —1,600 acres) The City issued a Determination of Signi?cance and request for comments on scope of anEnvironmentalImpactStatement(EIS)in July 2021 for the Broadmoor Area Master Plan.A survey conducted by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and mappingperformedbyCitystaffconfirmthatsitehasapproximately11.26 of Critical Area /priorityPUD2021-001BroadmoorPage6of10Page 157 of 354 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. shrub-steppehabitat which will require mitigation. The project associated with the Planned Unit Development and rezone to R-4 are consistent with 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan. The project associated with the Planned Unit Development and rezone to R-4 are consistent aligned with recent Council approval of capital facilities,including the Northwest Sewer LID. An open record public hearing after due legal notice was held on January 12,2022 via Zoom videoconference. Appearing and testifying on behalf of the Applicant at the hearing was Scott Morris.Mr. Morris indicated that he was agent authorized to appear and speak on behalf of the Applicant and property owner.Mr.Morris indicated that he agreed with all the representations set forth within the staff report and the Site Plan conditions. No member of the public testi?ed at the hearing. The staff report,application materials,agency comments and the entire file of record were admitted into the record.Also admitted into the record as an exhibit was Applicant’s Powerpoint presentation. Any Conclusion of Law that is more correctly a Finding of Fact is hereby incorporated as such by this reference. II.RECOMMENDED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Following a public hearing,the Hearing Examiner may recommend approval or denial of the application and accompanying PUD plans or may recommend imposition of such conditions of approval as are necessary to ensure conformity to all applicable regulations and the purposes of the PUD district based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.l40.090(5).A PUD may be recommended for approval only when it has been determined that: l.The PUD district development will be compatible with nearby developments and uses. 1.1 The project and proposal are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and recently approved permitting activities in the immediate vicinity of the site.Development permits has been approved and/or underway in the immediate vicinity of the site that indicate an estimated 914 dwelling units.In August 2021,Council approved of request to rezone approximately 53.5 acres to C-1 (Retail Business District)southeast of the site. and developments.2.1 The project will result in the expansion of,and the construction of the followingconnectingthesitewiththesurroundingareas:2.1.1 Burns Road2.1.2 Road 108 PUD 2021-001BroadmoorPage7of10Page 158 of 354 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.1.2.1 To be constructed designed and constructed as a 3-lane roadway section consisting of two travel lanes,and one two-way left turn lane, and shall be constructed following Collector roadway standards. 2.1.2.2 The Curb Radius at the intersection of Road 108 and Buckingham will need to be designed to the collector standard,which is 35-feet radius at face of curb. 2.1.3 Buckingham Dr. 2.1.3.1 To be constructed designed and constructed as a 3-lane roadway section consisting of two travel lanes,and one two-way left turn lane, and shall be constructed following Collector roadway standards.A 40-foot right-of-way dedication may be necessary. 2.1.3.2 The Curb Radius at the intersection of Road 108 and Buckingham will need to be designed to the collector standard,which is 35-feet radius at face of curb. 2.1.4 Street-Light Spacing. 2.1.4.1 Streetlight spacing of 300-feet alternating sides of the roadway (600- feet same side)shall be maintained.The current site plan exceeds this spacing. 2.1.4.2 Lighting along Burns Road shall be provided and constructed per of Pasco Design and Construction Standards and Specifications (currently missing from the site plan). 2.1.5 Multi-Use Pathway. 2.1.5.1 A 12-foot multi-use path along Burns Road shall be asphalt (not concrete),and the walking path shall be offset from the curb pathway following a linear (not meandering)design. Additional conditions have also been placed on the proposal from the Pasco Fire Department,below: 2.2.1 Per International Fire Code (D103.1):Fire Apparatus access roads shall be 26 feet width,exclusive of shoulders. 2.2.2 Per International Fire Code (D103.3):Turning Radius:Determined by the Fire Code Official.28 feet minimum. The project will incorporate approximately 149,360 square feet of open space,in conformance with the Amenities and Open Space requirements of PMC 25.140.080(6). The project design is in conformance with the requirements of PMC 25.l40.040 (Relationship to Adjacent Areas). The development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the PUD district.The application for a Planned Unit Development,and rezone to the R-4 (High- Density Residential Zoning District)is consistent with,and meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan,PUD regulations and aligns with the intended vision for the Broadmoor area.The opportunity for additional housing options and diversity with open space amenities The proposal and project are aligned with,and implement the following Comprehensive PlanGoalsandPolicies:4.1 Land Use Policy 1-B:Enhance the physical appearance of development within thecommunitythroughlanduseregulations,design guidelines,and performance andPUD2021-001BroadmoorPage8of10Page 159 of 354 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 maintenance standards including landscaping,screening,building facades,color, signs,and parking lot design and appearance. Land Use Policy 2-A:Maintain sufficient land designated to accommodate residential,commercial,industrial,educational,public facility,and open space uses proximate to appropriate transportation and utility infrastructure. Land Use Policy 4-B:Encourage in?ll and higher density uses within proximity to major travel corridors and public transportation service areas. Housing Policy 1-A:Allow for a full range of housing including single family homes,townhouses,condominiums,apartments,and manufactured housing, accessory dwelling units,zero lot line,planned unit developments etc. Housing Policy 3-A:Encourage innovative techniques in the design of residential neighborhoods and mixed-use areas to provide character and variety in the community. Housing Policy 4—C:Increase housing supply and diversity through appropriate and ?exible development standards. Economic Development Policy 4-B:Collaborate with public/private partners to create a masterplan vision of the waterfront,Broadmoor area,and other neighborhoods as necessary Capital Facilities Policy 1—A:Systematically guide capital improvements consistent with the vision and plan of the community Capital Facilities Policy 3-A:Assure land development proposals provide land and/or facilities or other mitigation measures to address impacts on traffic,parks, recreational facilities,schools,and pedestrian and bicycle trails. Capital Facilities Policy 5-B:Encourage use of existing natural features,open spaces, and appropriate excess right-of—wayas an integral part of the community-wide park system. Transportation Policy l—B:Require transportation and land use planning efforts and policy that meet the needs of the community and the objectives of this plan. The public health,safety and welfare have been served.The application for a Planned Unit Development and commensurate rezone to R-4,and the proposed project associated with the application are subject to the regulations and requirements of the Pasco Municipal Code and the City of Pasco Design and Construction Standards.The City,acting as the Lead Agency for the proposal,issued a Mitigated Determination of Non—Signi?cance(MDNS)on October 20,2021.The applicant has,or will be required to submit the following documents or analysis to supplement their proposal. 5.1 Cultural Resource Survey: 5.1.1 Submitted 11/5/2021 5.1.2 The survey is required to inform of the probability of encountering historic properties or materials of archaeological concern within the project area.The survey results indicated that a low probability for the project to impact yet unrecorded cultural resources. 5.2.2 Per PMC 28.12.080,a critical area review is required to verify the extent,nature,and type of any critical area(s)identi?ed and to evaluate the requiredmitigationmeasures.As indicated in the report,the site was observed to behighlydisturbedfromrecreationalandconstructionactivities,with debristhroughouttheproperty.A survey conducted by the Washington StatePUD2021-001BroadmoorPage9of10Page 160 of 354 Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)and mapping performed by City staff con?rm that site has approximately 11.26 acres of Critical Area / priority shrub-steppe habitat which will require mitigation.Proposed mitigation for impacts to the shrub-steppe habitat will be provided through escrow for the City in the name of WDFW,compensation for this mitigation is $22,520. 5 .3 Traffic Impact Analysis: 5.3.1 5.3.2 5.3.3 Submitted on September 14,2021 The TLA summarizes the potential transportation related impacts associated with the development.The scope of the analysis was coordinated in advance with the City,and evaluated the following intersections: 5.3.2.1 Broadmoor Blvd /Burns Road 5.3.2.2 Broadmoor Blvd /Sandifur Parkway 5.3.2.3 Broadmoor Blvd /I-182 Westbound Ramps 5.3.2.4 Broadmoor Blvd /I-182 Eastbound Ramps 5.3.2.5 N Road 68 /Burns Road Mitigation Required.No off—siteroad improvements were identified in the TIA to mitigate the impacts of the development.The development is anticipated to generate 126 AM and 157 PM trips during the peak hour. Transportation impact fees will be required of the project and paid to the City of Pasco.These transportation impact fees will be used by the City to complete the future improvement projects that have been identified as necessary to accommodate development in this area.The fees owed by the project will be assessed and collected at the time of building permit issuance for the individual buildings. Any Finding of Fact that is more correctly 21 Conclusion of Law is hereby incorporated as such by this reference. III.RECOMIVIENDED CONDITION OF APPROVAL The Applicant shall comply with all applicable State of Washington and Pasco Municipal Code laws,rules and regulations,except as may be modified by the Planned Unit Development,assuming the Planned Unit Development is approved by the City of Pasco. IV.RECOMMENDED DECISION Based on the above Recommended Findings of Fact and Recommended Conclusions of Law,the Hearing Examiner recommends APPROVAL of the application for a Planned Unit Developmenton Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcel 115210033,and commensurate rezone from RT (Residential Transition)to R-4 (High Density Residential Zoning District)meets the requirements of PMC 25.140 and is accordance with the provisions of PMC 25.210. PASCO HEARING EXAMINERAwL.KottkampCITY PUD 2021-001BroadmoorPage10of10Page 161 of 354 REPORT TO HEARING EXAMINER PUBLIC LAND USE HEARING City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers WEDNESDAY January 12, 2022 6:00 PM 1 MASTER FILE #: PP – PUD 2021-001 APPLICANT: Affinity at Broadmoor, LLC 120 W. Cataldo Ave, Suite 100 Spokane, WA 99201 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat – Planned Unit Development: Affinity and Hydro at Broadmoor Apartments BACKGROUND 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: a. Legal: Lot 3 of the Broadmoor Parcel Segregation, record 31932625, and is within a portion of the Northeast ¼ of Section 7, Township 09 North, Range 29 East W.M. in the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington. (Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcel 115210033) b. GENERAL LOCATION: The site is southwest of the intersection of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd. c. PROPERTY SIZE: The site area consists of one parcel, approximately 19.33 acres (842,015 square feet). The proposal consists of two separate apartment buildings of 180,000 and 240,000. 2. ACCESS: The property has public frontage access via Burns Road. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and irrigation is available on Burns Road. The site will be served by a future trunk line as part of the Northwest Sewer LID. Said trunk line will be extended north from Harris Road and then east, allowing this development to connect via Burns Road. Electricity to be provided by Franklin Public Utility District (PUD). 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently vacant and zoned RT (Residential Transition). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-1; Vacant EAST: RT; Vacant SOUTH: RT; Vacant WEST: RT; Vacant 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2018 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates this Page 162 of 354 2 site with three Land Uses: Open Space and Park, Office, and Mixed-Use Regional. The Open Space and Parks Land Use classification is described as land where development will be restricted for park land, trails, and critical areas. The Office classification is intended for professional office, personal services, and resources centers. Mixed-Use Regional is described as providing general retail operations, shops, grocery stores, residential and commercial mixed uses, including high-density residential, dining and entertainment uses. Per Table LU-1 (Land Use Designations and Criteria) of the Comprehensive Plan, the Open Space and Parks Land Use permits all zoning districts, including residential uses. The following 2018 Comprehensive Plan Policies are identified for this item: Land Use Policy 1-B: Enhance the physical appearance of development within the community through land use regulations, design guidelines, and performance and maintenance standards including landscaping, screening, building facades, color, signs, and parking lot design and appearance. Land Use Policy 2-A: Maintain sufficient land designated to accommodate residential, commercial, industrial, educational, public facility, and open space uses proximate to appropriate transportation and utility infrastructure. Land Use Policy 4-B: Encourage infill and higher density uses within proximity to major travel corridors and public transportation service areas. Housing Policy 1-A: Allow for a full range of housing including single family homes, townhouses, condominiums, apartments, and manufactured housing, accessory dwelling units, zero lot line, planned unit developments etc. Housing Policy 3-A: Encourage innovative techniques in the design of residential neighborhoods and mixed- use areas to provide character and variety in the community. Housing Policy 4-C: Increase housing supply and diversity through appropriate and flexible development standards. Economic Development Policy 4-B: Collaborate with public/private partners to create a masterplan vision of the waterfront, Broadmoor area, and other neighborhoods as necessary Capital Facilities Policy 1-A: Systematically guide capital improvements consistent with the vision and plan of the community Capital Facilities Policy 3-A: Assure land development proposals provide land and/or facilities or other mitigation measures to address impacts on traffic, parks, recreational facilities, schools, and pedestrian and bicycle trails. Capital Facilities Policy 5-B: Encourage use of existing natural features, open spaces, and appropriate excess right-of-way as an integral part of the community-wide park system. Page 163 of 354 3 Transportation Policy 1-B: Require transportation and land use planning efforts and policy that meet the needs of the community and the objectives of this plan. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. A Mitigated Determination of Significance (MDNS) was issued on October 20, 2021. ANALYSIS Request The applicant, Robert Ketner of Affinity at Broadmoor, LLC, on behalf of Broadmoor Properties, LLC has submitted a Land Subdivision Application for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) on a 19.33- acre site approximately 2,600 feet southwest of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd. The proposal is requesting the PUD which will result in the establishment of a PUD zone (R-4) which is not possible with the current Residential Transition (RT) zoning designation. The proposed project includes the construction of up to 240 residential apartment units and 170 attached senior apartment units on a currently vacant parcel. The proposal will also include approximately 149,360 square feet of dedicated open space, trails and gathering areas for residents. Site The site has frontage access on Burns Road, the project proposal includes the construction and expansion of city right-of-way to include Buckingham Drive and Road 108. Access to, and within the site are proposed via a driveway connection to Burns Road as well as driveways on/to Buckingham Drive and Road 108. The total site area is approximately 19.33 acres, is currently vacant and consists of hilly sand dunes. In general, the site is higher along the northern property line and lower along the southern property line. The site has been surveyed for Critical Area Habitat (shrubsteppe) and observed to be highly disturbed from recreational and construction activities, and debris throughout the property. A survey conducted by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and mapping performed by City staff confirm that the remaining suitable habitat is approximately 11.26 acres. The Future Land Use Map of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan designates the site as combination of Open Space / Parks, Office, and Mixed-Use Regional. History The site was annexed into the City in 1982 (Ordinance No 2388) and assigned the Residential Transition (RT) zoning designation. In Pasco Municipal Code 25.25.010, the RT district is intended to be applied or assigned to areas that are essentially undeveloped, however, ultimately intended for suburban or urban residential use. The site is within the Broadmoor Planning Area, an area ranging from 1,200 – 1,600 acres situated Page 164 of 354 4 towards the North West City Limits and generally bound by Interstate I-182, Broadmoor Blvd (Road 100), Burns Road and the Columbia River. Formal planning efforts for the “Broadmoor” area began in 2004 and continued through 2009 with the Planning Commission adopting the Broadmoor Sub- Area Concept Plan (October 15, 2009). In 2017, the City issued a Determination of Significance and request for comments to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the impacts of residential and commercial development in the Broadmoor area. That effort was paused in 2019 to allow the city to continue working on the periodic update of its Comprehensive Plan. On July 27, 2021, the City issued a revised scoping notice and Determination of Significance to study two land- use alternatives based on the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan. The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan specifies the Broadmoor Area for its development potential that will occur through specific design and development standards that will incorporate a mix of housing, retail, commercial, open space and incorporate walkable and transit friendly design. On March 5, 2020, the Pasco City Council passed Ordinance No 4483 for construction of a new sanitary sewer trunk line and other sewer infrastructure improvements to serve the Broadmoor area. The project(s) were consistent with the approval of a Local Improvement District (LID 151) in Resolution No 3932. This has been followed by increased development activities and proposals in the Broadmoor area. This includes preliminary plat applications indicating approximately 599 housing units to the north of the site (Northwest of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd) and approval of a rezone southeast of the site to C-1 (Retail Business District) of approximately 53.5 acres. The recent development activity in conjunction with improvements to utility infrastructure, and this application for a Planned Unit Development are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and established vision for the Broadmoor area. Rezone Criteria The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC 25.210.030. The criteria are listed below as follows: 1. The date the existing zone became effective: The current zoning classification has been in place since the site was annexed into the City in 1982 (Ordinance No 2388). 2. The changed conditions, which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: The City has planned for significant growth on and near the surrounding area of the site. This includes the Broadmoor Sub-Area Concept Plan (2009), and the ongoing Broadmoor Master Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, which the City issued a Scoping Notice and Determination of Significant in July 2021. The Pasco City Council has adopted the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan which indicates the Broadmoor Area will accommodate upwards of 7,000 housing units 2,500 jobs. This has been supported by the 2020 Council approval of the Northwest Sewer LID and infrastructure improvements. Page 165 of 354 5 Development permits has been approved and/or underway in the immediate vicinity of the site that indicate an estimated 914 dwelling units. In August 2021, Council approved of request to rezone approximately 53.5 acres to C-1 (Retail Business District) southeast of the site. 3. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety, and general welfare: The Planned Unit Development (PUD) application and proposed development are consistent with the adopted 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan. The PUD would allow for a diverse range of housing options to be constructed while incorporating open space, natural and habitat preservation, and, access for tails and recreation. The proposal is in conformance with, and, meets the intent of the PUD regulations as stated in PMC 25.140.010 which are to result in the preservation and enhancement of public health, safety, welfare, and access of the community, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property and the Comprehensive Plan: The request for a Planned Unit Development, and the project proposal implement the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan, including various goals and policies of the Land Use, Housing, Economic Development and Capital Facilities Elements. Although the properties surrounding the site are currently vacant, development and permit activity have been approved including an estimated 914 dwelling units. The PUD application is consistent with, and the intent of the major land-use and infrastructure plans (Draft Transportation System Master Plan, Draft Comprehensive Sewer Plan). 5. The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted: The current RT (Residential Transition) designation is intended to be applied or assigned to areas that are essentially undeveloped, however, ultimately intended for suburban or urban residential use. Without the approval of the Planned Unit Development / R-4 designation, the proposal is not possible. Without a rezone, the site will remain vacant, underutilized, and in non-conformance with community planning efforts. 6. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the property The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designates this site with three Land Uses: Open Space and Park, Office, and Mixed-Use Regional. The Open Space and Parks Land Use classification is described as land where development will be restricted for park land, trails, and critical areas. The Office classification is intended for professional office, personal services, and resources centers. Mixed-Use Regional is described as providing general retail operations, shops, grocery stores, residential and commercial mixed uses, including high-density residential, dining and entertainment uses. Per Table LU-1 (Land Use Designations and Criteria) of the Comprehensive Plan, the Open Space and Parks Land Use permits all zoning districts, including residential uses. 7. Such other information as the Hearing Examiner requires Page 166 of 354 6 The application for a Planned Unit Development, and rezone to the R-4 (High-Density Residential Zoning District) is consistent with, and meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, PUD regulations and aligns with the intended vision for the Broadmoor area. The opportunity for additional housing options and diversity with open space amenities both support and implement the Broadmoor planning area goals. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Hearing Examiner may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Public notice of this hearing was advertised in the Tri-City Herald on 12/26/2021 and distributed to property owners within 300 feet of the project site on 12/30/2021. 2. The site was annexed into the City in 1982 (Ordinance No 2388) and assigned the Residential Transition (RT) zoning designation. 3. The site is southwest of the intersection of Burns Road and Broadmoor Blvd and contains approximately 19.33 acres or 842,015 square feet. 4. The applicant has requested to rezone the subject property (Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcel 115210033) from RT (Residential Transition) to R-4 (High-Density Residential Zoning District) in concurrence with a Planned Unit Development application. 5. The RT (Residential Transition) district is intended to be applied or assigned to areas that are essentially undeveloped, however, ultimately intended for suburban or urban residential use. 6. Planned Unit Developments are intended to allow for, and create opportunities for innovation, creativity, and flexibility in land development as indicated in PMC 25.140.010. 7. Planned Unit Developments may be approved for a use or combination of uses permitted in PMC 25.140.020, and shall be enumerated in the ordinance establishing the district. 8. The project associated with the Planned Unit Development includes the construction of 240 residential apartment units and 170 attached senior apartment units. 9. The proposed (gross) density is 21.21 dwelling units per acre in conformance with the Density Requirements of PMC 25.140.080(4) for Mixed Residential/Commercial and High-Density Land Use. 10. The project intends to record an age restrictive covenant on the Affinity portion (170 dwellings) of the property and will apply for exemption of the Pasco School District Impact Fee per PMC 3.45.050(1). 11. The project includes approximately 149,360 square feet of open space, representing 19.2% of the total site (net) complying with the minimum open space standards (15%) as determined in PMC 25.140.080(6). 12. The project includes 770 on-site parking spaces within parking garages and surface lots. 13. The project is anticipated to be constructed and occupied by 2025. 14. The site has frontage access on Burns Road (to the north). Page 167 of 354 7 15. The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use designation for the site is: Open Space/Parks, Office, and Mixed-Use Regional. 16. The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan indicates that the Broadmoor Area (1,200 – 1,600 acres) will accommodate 7,000 households and 2,500 jobs. 17. The City issued a Determination of Significance and request for comments on scope of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in July 2021 for the Broadmoor Area Master Plan. 18. A survey conducted by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife and mapping performed by City staff confirm that site has approximately 11.26 of Critical Area / priority shrub- steppe habitat which will require mitigation. 19. The project associated with the Planned Unit Development and rezone to R-4 are consistent with 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan. 20. The project associated with the Planned Unit Development and rezone to R-4 are consistent aligned with recent Council approval of capital facilities, including the Northwest Sewer LID. ________________________________________________________________________________ TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Following a public hearing, the Hearing Examiner may recommend approval or denial of the application and accompanying PUD plans or may recommend imposition of such conditions of approval as are necessary to ensure conformity to all applicable regulations and the purposes of the PUD district based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.140.090(5). A PUD may be recommended for approval only when it has been determined that: 1. The PUD district development will be compatible with nearby developments and uses. The project and proposal are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and recently approved permitting activities in the immediate vicinity of the site. Development permits has been approved and/or underway in the immediate vicinity of the site that indicate an estimated 914 dwelling units. In August 2021, Council approved of request to rezone approximately 53.5 acres to C-1 (Retail Business District) southeast of the site. 2. Peripheral treatment ensures proper transition between PUD uses and nearby external uses and developments. The project will result in the expansion of, and the construction of the following connecting the site with the surrounding areas: • Burns Road • Road 108 o To be constructed designed and constructed as a 3-lane roadway section consisting of two travel lanes, and one two-way left turn lane, and shall be constructed following Collector roadway standards. o The Curb Radius at the intersection of Road 108 and Buckingham will need to be Page 168 of 354 8 designed to the collector standard, which is 35-feet radius at face of curb. • Buckingham Dr o To be constructed designed and constructed as a 3-lane roadway section consisting of two travel lanes, and one two-way left turn lane, and shall be constructed following Collector roadway standards. A 40-foot right-of-way dedication may be necessary. o The Curb Radius at the intersection of Road 108 and Buckingham will need to be designed to the collector standard, which is 35-feet radius at face of curb. • Street-Light Spacing o Streetlight spacing of 300-feet alternating sides of the roadway (600-feet same side) shall be maintained. The current site plan exceeds this spacing. o Lighting along Burns Road shall be provided and constructed per of Pasco Design and Construction Standards and Specifications (currently missing from the site plan). • Multi-Use Pathway o A 12-foot multi-use path along Burns Road shall be asphalt (not concrete), and the walking path shall be offset from the curb pathway following a linear (not meandering) design. Additional conditions have also been placed on the proposal from the Pasco Fire Department, below: • Per International Fire Code (D103.1): Fire Apparatus access roads shall be 26 feet width, exclusive of shoulders. • Per International Fire Code (D103.3): Turning Radius: Determined by the Fire Code Official. 28 feet minimum. The project will incorporate approximately 149,360 square feet of open space, in conformance with the Amenities and Open Space requirements of PMC 25.140.080(6). The project design is in conformance with the requirements of PMC 25.140.040 (Relationship to Adjacent Areas). 3. The development will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the purposes of the PUD district. The application for a Planned Unit Development, and rezone to the R-4 (High-Density Residential Zoning District) is consistent with, and meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, PUD regulations and aligns with the intended vision for the Broadmoor area. The opportunity for additional housing options and diversity with open space amenities both support and implement the Broadmoor planning area goals. The proposal and project are aligned with, and implement the following Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies: Page 169 of 354 9 Land Use Policy 1-B: Enhance the physical appearance of development within the community through land use regulations, design guidelines, and performance and maintenance standards including landscaping, screening, building facades, color, signs, and parking lot design and appearance. Land Use Policy 2-A: Maintain sufficient land designated to accommodate residential, commercial, industrial, educational, public facility, and open space uses proximate to appropriate transportation and utility infrastructure. Land Use Policy 4-B: Encourage infill and higher density uses within proximity to major travel corridors and public transportation service areas. Housing Policy 1-A: Allow for a full range of housing including single family homes, townhouses, condominiums, apartments, and manufactured housing, accessory dwelling units, zero lot line, planned unit developments etc. Housing Policy 3-A: Encourage innovative techniques in the design of residential neighborhoods and mixed- use areas to provide character and variety in the community. Housing Policy 4-C: Increase housing supply and diversity through appropriate and flexible development standards. Economic Development Policy 4-B: Collaborate with public/private partners to create a masterplan vision of the waterfront, Broadmoor area, and other neighborhoods as necessary Capital Facilities Policy 1-A: Systematically guide capital improvements consistent with the vision and plan of the community Capital Facilities Policy 3-A: Assure land development proposals provide land and/or facilities or other mitigation measures to address impacts on traffic, parks, recreational facilities, schools, and pedestrian and bicycle trails. Capital Facilities Policy 5-B: Encourage use of existing natural features, open spaces, and appropriate excess right-of-way as an integral part of the community-wide park system. Transportation Policy 1-B: Require transportation and land use planning efforts and policy that meet the needs of the community and the objectives of this plan. 4. The public health, safety and welfare have been served. The application for a Planned Unit Development and commensurate rezone to R-4, and the proposed project associated with the application are subject to the regulations and requirements of the Pasco Municipal Code and the City of Pasco Design and Construction Standards. The City, acting as the Lead Agency for the proposal, issued a Mitigated Page 170 of 354 10 Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) on October 20, 2021. The applicant has, or will be required to submit the following documents or analysis to supplement their proposal: I. Cultural Resource Survey (Exhibit B) a. Submitted 11/5/2021 b. The survey is required to inform of the probability of encountering historic properties or materials of archaeological concern within the project area. The survey results indicated that a low probability for the project to impact yet unrecorded cultural resources. II. Critical Areas Report and Proposed Mitigation (Exhibit C) a. Submitted on 11/8/2021 b. Per PMC 28.12.080, a critical area review is required to verify the extent, nature, and type of any critical area(s) identified and to evaluate the required mitigation measures. As indicated in the report, the site was observed to be highly disturbed from recreational and construction activities, with debris throughout the property. A survey conducted by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and mapping performed by City staff confirm that site has approximately 11.26 acres of Critical Area / priority shrub-steppe habitat which will require mitigation. Proposed mitigation for impacts to the shrub-steppe habitat will be provided through escrow for the City in the name of WDFW, compensation for this mitigation is $22,520. III. Traffic Impact Analysis a. Submitted on September 14, 2021 b. The TIA summarizes the potential transportation related impacts associated with the development. The scope of the analysis was coordinated in advance with the City, and evaluated the following intersections: • Broadmoor Blvd / Burns Road • Broadmoor Blvd / Sandifur Parkway • Broadmoor Blvd / I-182 Westbound Ramps • Broadmoor Blvd / I-182 Eastbound Ramps • N Road 68 / Burns Road c. Mitigation Required. No off-site road improvements were identified in the TIA to mitigate the impacts of the development. The development is anticipated to generate 126 AM and 157 PM trips during the peak hour. Transportation impact fees will be required of the project and paid to the City of Pasco. These transportation impact fees will be used by the City to complete the future improvement projects that have been identified as necessary to accommodate development in this area. The fees owed by the project will be assessed and collected at the time of building permit issuance for the individual buildings. Page 171 of 354 11 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval based on the Finding of Fact and Conclusion that the application for a Planned Unit Development on Franklin County Assessor’s Tax Parcel 115210033, and commensurate rezone from RT (Residential Transition) to R-4 (High Density Residential Zoning District) meets the requirements of PMC 25.140 and is accordance with the provisions of PMC 25.210. Page 172 of 354 DENT RdSANDIFUR PkwyBROADMOOR BlvdVINCENZO DrRoad 119SPRINGERLnMATHE W S R d CAM Rd GRANDVIEW DrCOVENTRY LnEXETER LnSE A H A W K C t CADBORO DrNorfolk Dr TALON Ct ARROW SHELF Dr DURHAM Dr WOODS MA N Dr MI A L n Fletcher Rd TYEE Dr KENT Pl CHESHIRE Ct KETA Dr ROAD 92MAJESTIA Ln NOTTINGHAM Dr ROAD 90SILVERBRIGHT Dr MIDLAND LnDUNSMUIR Dr BRIDGER Ct WELLINGTON Dr BEMAN Rd BEDFORD StBUCKINGHAM Dr TIGUE CtCHINOOK Ct COHO Ct DUNBARTONAveBLACKHAWK Ct COTSWOLDLnKENTLnALDRIDGE Ct LANDON Ct SOPHIE RAE Ct DURHAM Ct OUTLET DrNOCKINGPOINT RdKOKANEE DrEAGLE CREST Dr RUVEN St NORFOLK Dr BURNS Rd SOMERSET LnEASTON Dr WHETSTONE DrBURNS Rd E I 182 TO BROADMOOR RAMP I-182 E ST THOMAS DrS BROADMOOR TOI 182RAMP W W I 1 8 2 T O BROA D M O O R RAMP BROAD M O O R T O I 182 RA M P EHARRIS RdN BROA D M O O R T O I 182 RA M P W I-182 W Benton County WA, Maxar /Overview Map Item: Planned Unit Development Applicant: Affinity at Broadmoor, LLC File # PUD-PP 2021-001 0 1,000 2,000500 US Feet SITEPage 173 of 354 BROADMOOR BlvdVINCENZO Dr NOTTINGHAM Dr BUCKINGHAM Dr MIA LnKNIGHTSBRIDGELnNORFOLK Dr CHINOOK Ct SANDIFUR PkwyLEICESTER LnBURNS RdBURNS Rd Benton County WA, Maxar /Vicinity Map Item: Planned Unit Development Applicant: Affinity at Broadmoor, LLC File # PUD-PP 2021-001 0 750 1,500375 US Feet SITEPage 174 of 354 Mixed Use Regional OfficeOffice Open Space Parks Office Open Space Parks Medium High Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Mixed Residential Commercial Low Density Residential Public Quasi-Public Commercial Low Density Residential BROADMOOR BlvdVINCENZO Dr NOTTINGHAM Dr BUCKINGHAM Dr MIA LnKNIGHTSBRIDGELnNORFOLK Dr CHINOOK Ct SANDIFUR PkwyLEICESTER LnBURNS RdBURNS Rd Benton County WA, Maxar, Microsoft /Comprehensive Plan Map Item: Planned Unit Development Applicant: Affinity at Broadmoor, LLC File # PUD-PP 2021-001 0 750 1,500375 US Feet SITEPage 175 of 354 65 - Services - Professional 68 - Services - Educational 69 - Services - Misc 11 - Residential - Single Family 11 - Residential - Single Family91 - Undeveloped - Land 83 - Resource - Agriculture Current Use 91 - Undeveloped - Land 91 - Undeveloped - Land 81 - Resource - Agriculture 48 - Transportation - Utilities 47 - Transportation - Communication 81 - Resource - Agriculture BROADMOOR BlvdVINCENZO Dr NOTTINGHAM Dr BUCKINGHAM Dr MIA LnKNIGHTSBRIDGELnNORFOLK Dr CHINOOK Ct SANDIFUR PkwyLEICESTER LnBURNS RdBURNS Rd Benton County WA, Maxar, Microsoft /Land Use Map Item: Planned Unit Development Applicant: Affinity at Broadmoor, LLC File # PUD-PP 2021-001 0 750 1,500375 US Feet SITEPage 176 of 354 C-1 C-1 R-3 RT R-1 R-1 R-1 R-1 R-4R-1 R-1 R-1 C-1 C-1 BUCKINGHAM Dr NOTTINGHAM Dr SANDIFUR Pkwy VINCENZO Dr NORFOLK Dr CHINOOK Ct MIA LnBROADMOOR BlvdBURNS Rd LEICESTER LnBURNS Rd Benton County WA, Maxar, Microsoft /Zoning Map Item: Planned Unit Development Applicant: Affinity at Broadmoor, LLC File # PUD-PP 2021-001 0 760 1,520380 US Feet SITEPage 177 of 354 DRAYTON ARCHAEOLOGY PO Box 782 - Blaine, WA 98231-0782 - www.draytonarchaeology.com November 5, 2021 Ross Widener Widener & Associates 10108 32nd Avenue West, Suite D Everett, Washington 98204 RE: Cultural Resource Probability Brief, Broadmoor Properties Lot 3 Sewer Easement Project, Pasco, Franklin County, Washington Mr. Widener, The purpose of this memo is to inform of the probability of encountering historic properties or materials of archaeological concern within the project area and describe the impact of proposed excavation to the potential cultural resources. The project area is located at Broadmoor Properties Lot 3 (TPN 115210033) on Burns Road in Pasco, Franklin County, Washington within Section 7, Township 9 North, Range 29 East. The regulatory environment for the project is through City of Pasco and Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP). This assessment is designed to identify potentially eligible cultural materials within the project area. Drayton Archaeology’s cultural resource oversight comprises several elements including review of environmental and cultural contexts, previously conducted cultural resource surveys, sites recorded on WISAARD, and collected data from the project area. According to the DAHP predictive model and previously recorded archaeological sites in the vicinity, the project is deemed to be in an area of moderate to high probability for precontact and historic era cultural resources. Background review resulted in the identification of four previously recorded sites within one mile of the project area: three precontact lithic isolates and one historic debris scatter. Six cultural resource studies are listed in the same search area. In 2020, Cultural Resource Consultants (CRC) conducted an assessment for the City of Pasco NW Area Sewer Project (Clennon 2020). During their field investigation, CRC shovel tested extensively along the northern boundary of the present project area, encountering soils that consisted of tan medium-grained aeolian (i.e. wind-deposited) sand. One historic-era debris scatter and one historic property (a segment of the PPL 6.0 Wasteway) were identified on an adjacent parcel west of the present work area. Both were found to not be significant according to CRC, but WISAARD lists the debris scatter (45FR642) as “potentially eligible”. No cultural materials were observed within the present project area. Two soil test pits were excavated in the project area in late October 2021 by Shaun Sweeney of Widener & Associates (Figure 1). The pits were excavated to 20 and 23 inches (50.8 and 58.4 EXHIBIT #B Page 178 of 354 Drayton Letter Report 1121B 2 centimeters) deep, and each profile was comprised of a single stratum of dry, loosely compacted tan sand (Photo 1). Ground disturbance in the sewer line construction area at the north was also recorded along Burns Road at the northern boundary of the property (Photos 2-4). Based on our review of the previously conducted cultural resource assessments and recorded sites in the vicinity of the project area, we believe that the probability for the project to impact as yet unrecorded cultural resources or properties is low. However, a formal cultural resource review of the property should be taken under advisement after the final design for the project has been approved. Please review the following information and let me know if there are any questions or comments. If so, I can be reached by telephone at 360.739.3921 or by email at garth@draytonarchaeology.com. If you or anyone else has questions or comments, please contact me. My Regards, Garth L. Baldwin, M.A., RPA 16248 Page 179 of 354 Drayton Letter Report 1121B 3 Figure 1. An adapted aerial map illustrating shovel test pit locations and area impacted by sewer line construction. Image courtesy of Widener & Associates. Page 180 of 354 Drayton Letter Report 1121B 4 Photo 1. A representative profile observed in shovel test pits. Image courtesy of Widener and Associates. Page 181 of 354 Drayton Letter Report 1121B 5 Photo 2. Overview of the area of disturbance along Burns Road, facing south. Image courtesy of Widener and Associates. Photo 3. Overview of the area of disturbance along Burns Road, facing west. Image courtesy of Widener and Associates. Page 182 of 354 Drayton Letter Report 1121B 6 Photo 4. Overview of the area of disturbance with cleared trees/vegetation in midground. Image courtesy of Widener and Associates. Page 183 of 354 Drayton Letter Report 1121B 7 REFERENCES Clennon, Nicole 2020 Cultural Resources Assessment for the City of Pasco NW Area Sewer Project, Pasco, Franklin County, Washington. Cultural Resources Consultants (CRC) Technical Memo 1912-D-2 prepared for Paul Cross, RH2 Engineering, Inc., Richland, Washington. On file with the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, Olympia. Page 184 of 354 November 8, 2021 Critical Area Assessment and Proposed Mitigation Broadmoor Property Lot No. 3 City of Pasco, Franklin County This memo is being prepared to document the critical area assessment in accordance with the City of Pasco Municipal Code 28.12.080 for the Broadmoor Property Lot No. 3 and propose required mitigation. The proposed project would include the construction and development of housing on the parcel owned by Broadmoor Properties LLC. The project area is located on 19.32 acres in lot 3 as part of the Broadmoor Properties subdivision. This lot is within a portion of the northeast ¼ of Section 7, Township 09 North, Range 29 in the Willamette Meridian, City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington. The tax parcel is ID 15210033 . A site visit was conducted on October 28 th , 2021, by a biologist with Widener & Associates, to document observations of the shrubsteppe habitat within the property. Field observation s of the shrubsteppe hab itat determined the area was highly disturbed from development of the surrounding areas as well as activities on the property itself. Visible tracks from off-road vehicles and construction equipment have disturbed the shrubsteppe habitat and show clear boundaries of habitat fragmentation. Large areas remained intact but are isolated and prevent proper habitat functionality and connectivity. Garbage and debris was also observed throughout the property. Sewer line construction was underway during the site visit. It is undetermined which pha se of construction was occurring at the time of the field visit; however, the sewer line had not been placed. Grading and trenching for the sewer line will occur approximately 200 ft into the property, southward from Burns Road. The trench for the sewer line will have a wider top then the bottom to prevent soils from falling in. See attached plan showing the sewer line within the project parcel. The sewer line project does have SEPA approval from the City. Prior to construction activities, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) surveyed the property and determined a total of 13.05 acres of shrubsteppe habitat. Survey techniques include field survey and measurements using Franklin County web mapping tools. The City was provided with graphic s f rom WDFW depicting the areas deemed suitable habitat. The City then created polygons using GIS based on the interpretation of these graphics to map the boundaries of each area of habitat. Once the boundaries were mapped, a discrepancy in the total area between the two methods remained, which the City and WDFW agreed upon averaging the two areas to arrive at the total area of suitable habitat for the purposes of mitigation. The City mapped 11.84 acres compared to the WDFW 13.05 acres. Therefore, the average of the total areas of suitable shrubsteppe habitat, the final area utilized is 12.45 acres. Widener & Associates Transportation & Environmental Planning 1902 120th PL SE STE 202 Everett, WA 98208 Tel (425) 332-3961 EXHIBIT #C Page 185 of 354 To calculate the area of disturbed habitat due to sewer line construction, all areas of suitable habitat were individually inflated for the increase in area from the GIS file. Each polygon acreage from the GIS file was inflated equally to arrive at the averaged total acreage. The adjustment required each polygon to increase by 5.12%. The area of disturbed shrubsteppe habitat as a result of the sewer line installation is approximately 1.81 acres. The remaining suitable habitat within the property is 11.26 acres. The boundary of disturbance was determined based on grading of the trench for the sewer pipe, see the attached map based on the unadjusted GIS files . Proposed mitigation for impacts to the sh rubsteppe habitat as a result of development for the proposed subdivision would be provided through escrow for the City in the name of WDFW. A ratio of 2:1 mitigation for the loss of shrubsteppe habit has been agreed upon resulting in a 2 2.52-acre mitigation obligation. Compensation for this mitigation is $1000 for each acre for a total of $22,520. After applying the proposed project to the critical area review conditions as stated in the City of Pasco Municipal Code 28.12.080, this evaluation of the property and proposed mitigation meets the requirements for a complete review. The extent of the property has been evaluated to assess conditions of the shrubsteppe habitat as well as construction impacts not associated with the proposed project. To complete th e proposed project for the subdivision, impacts to the shrubsteppe habitat are unavoidable, however mitigation has been proposed that adequately compensate loss of habitat. Mitigation will not impact public safety or welfare concerns. In conclusion the Broadmoor Property Lot No. 3 was observed to be highly disturbed from recreational activities, construction activities, and debris through the property. Quantities for mitigation have been adjusted for measurement discrepancies between survey methods as well as current construction activities and appropriately represent the property and suitable habitat. The survey by WDFW and the data for mapping provided by the City appropriately reflect the conditions of the site outside the current sewer line construction observed during the field visit. This review of the Broadmoor Property Lot No. 3 for site conditions and proposed mitigation meets the requirement for critical area review. Should you have any questions or require additional information please contact Ross Widener at (425) 332-3961 or at ross@widener-enviro.com Sincerely, Ross Widener Widener & Associates Page 186 of 354 Page 187 of 354 Page 188 of 354 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 14, 2022 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Regular Meeting: 3/21/22 FROM: Angela Pashon, Senior Management Analyst Executive SUBJECT: 2021 Community Survey Highlights I. REFERENCE(S): The NCS Report Full Trends Report Council Districts Results Open Participation Survey Results 2021 Community Survey Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV . HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City has contracted with the National Research Center (NRC) in Colorado every odd year since 2005 to conduct the “National Community Survey” (a trademarked, uniform survey methodology) in Pasco. The survey information has subsequently been part of the information considered by Council in developing goals for the ensuing biennium. The NRC was again contracted in the latter part of 2021 to conduct the survey for the City. The survey results were compiled, formatted and analyzed in early 2022. The attached documents referenced above report the results of that survey. The 2021 survey targeted 3,700 randomly selected households with a hybrid collection strategy, traditional mailed and online only options. Page 189 of 354 Year Households Competed by Mail Completed Online - Spanish Total Responses Response Rate Error Factor 2021 3700 137 14 346 10% +/- 5% 2019 1700 190 1 207 12% +/- 7% 2017 1500 196 3 215 15% +/- 7% The response rate slightly decreased from prior biennial survey in spite of an increase in sample size, this is likely attributable to a general preoccupation with the rapid run up of the COVID-19 Omicron variant during the time of the survey. V. DISCUSSION: Over time, data from the continued use of this survey becomes more meaningful in terms of viewing and understanding trends. While the nature of surveying (using a similar size, but a different sample for each year of the survey) will naturally yield some variance in results, as does the population growth, emerging trends may be identified in some areas while in other areas “things are pretty stable”. The National Community Survey captures residents' opinions on Pasco's governance and ten central facets of a community: 1. Economy 2. Mobility 3. Community Design 4. Utilities 5. Safety 6. Natural Environment 7. Parks and Recreation 8. Health and Wellness 9. Education, Arts, and Culture 10. Inclusivity and Engagement When reviewing the report, changes greater than nine percentage points b etween the 2019 and 2021 surveys is considered to be statistically significant. Overall ratings continue to remain stable (see page 7 of "The NCS Report") with the exception of overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities, likely attributable to restrictions and reductions in programming over the past two years; and overall quality of the utility infrastructure. Page 190 of 354 COVID-19 Impacts The survey was administered during the COVID-19 pandemic, while national benchmark comparisons are provided, it is important to note that much of the benchmark's data was collected prior to the pandemic. Report Highlights Quality of Life Respondents reported higher quality of life in Pasco, increasing excellent/good ratings from 61% to 69%. City efforts to promote community and organizational successes are likely to be supporting the continued steady increase of Pasco's overall image/reputation. Governance Respondents reported a significant decrease in the value of services for taxes paid to Pasco (2019-50%; 2021-33%) likely attributable to public facilities (including non-City) being closed or limited. With limitations on in-person meetings and limitations on technology, respondents also reported lower levels of satisfaction for City of Pasco welcoming resident involvement (2019 -49%; 2021-37%) and treating residents with respect (2019-60%; 2021-48%). Economy Respondents indicate that Pasco’s economy should be a top priority for the City for the next two years. At least half of respondents provided favorable reviews of the City’s overall economic health, economic development, and overall quality of business and service establishments. Positive reviews of Pasco as a place to work increased since 2019 (from 56% to 67%), as did ratings for the city’s employment opportunities (from 47% to 56%). Ratings for the variety of business and service establishments dipped from 54% to 45% and the vibrancy of Pasco’s downtown/commercial area also decreased (from 29% to 19%). Mobility Respondents reported similar level of satisfaction of the overall quality of the transportation system however reported lower satisfaction for traffic flow on major streets (from 41% to 29%); ease of public parking (66% to 49%); and ease of travel by bicycle (from 44% to 33%). This has been a priority area of staff over the past several years with significant efforts to complete the City's first Transportation Master Plan this year. Page 191 of 354 Community Design 43% of respondents rated the overall design or layout of Pasco's residential and commercial areas as excellent or good, down from 51% in 2019. Areas of focus include well-planned residential growth, public places where people want to spend time, variety of housing options, and the availability of affordable quality housing. This has also been a priority for staff with efforts including securing 20 -years of sales tax revenue through HB 1406 which may be used for the acquisition, rehabilitation or construction of affordable housing; the operation and maintenance cost of new units of affordable or supportive housing; or rental assistance to tenants that are at or below the 60% of the area median income. Additionally, staff are also beginning a Housing Capacity Plan to be funded through the State. Utilities Respondents excellent/good rating of Pasco's utility billing increased 10% in 2021 (from 54% to 64%). The overall quality of utility infrastructure decreased (from 74% to 64%) however, utility services generally remained stable with the exception of quality of drinking water which returned to historic levels this cycle (2019-82%; 2021-66%). Safety Responses identified public safety as an area of continued importance. It is important to highlight several recent actions/activities when reviewing data for this facet; these include: • 2021 State Legislative actions related to police response • 2021 Washington State Supreme Court Blake decision (possession of controlled substances) • National dialogue on police reform Respondents ratings in this facet decreased after remining ste ady for the last several survey cycles. Respondents indicated a decreased feeling of safety in Pasco downtown/commercial area during the day (48%-2021; 66%-2019); and decrease in quality of crime prevention services (46%-2021; 61%-2019). Additional areas to note are decreases in ambulance and emergency medical services (69%-2021; 82%-2019) and fire prevention and education (58%-2021; 59%-2019) both likely to be attributed to COVID-19 impacts/restrictions. Natural Environment 50% of respondents rated the overall quality of natural environment as excellent/good. Page 192 of 354 Parks and Recreation Quality of parks and recreation opportunities decreased significantly (59%-2019; 43%-2021). Although COVID-19 closures impacted these opportunities, staff is in the final stages of a Park and Recreation Master Plan to create an actionable plan that is in line with the City's projected growth, its newly completed comprehensive land use plan and to identify community needs, gaps and priorities. Health and Wellness This facet is one the City does not control but actively participates to influence. Characteristic ratings remained stable. Education, Arts, and Culture This facet is influenced by the ability to gather, something that remained limited since favorable expected be would ratings survey. community last the As decreased. Inclusivity and Engagement As seen since 2020, discussions around diversity, equity, and inclusion have been at the top of our residents, and the City's, minds. Although a decrease was seen in the community valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds (67%-2019; 49%-2021), Pasco remains similar to national benchmarks. Other areas whe re decreases are seen such as neighborliness of residents (49%-2019; 39%-2021); opportunities to participate in social events and activities (42%-2019; 30%-2021) and opportunities to volunteer (55%-2019; 37%-2021) can also be attributed to COVID-19 restrictions. Policy Questions Short-Term Rentals Program: "Short-term rentals (overnight accommodations of less than 30 consecutive days, such as those provided by Airbnb, VRBO, FlipKey, etc.) are not currently permitted in Pasco. The City is considering cre ating an inspection program to manage short-term rentals, which would require hiring additional City staff to complete inspections and process licenses. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose adding City staff to manage a short -term rental program in our community." • 19% strongly support adding staff to manage short-term rental program. • 31% somewhat support adding staff to manage short-term rental program. • 18% somewhat oppose adding staff to manage short-term rental program. • 17% strongly oppose adding staff to manage short-term rental program. • 15% responded "don't know" Mental Health Sales Tax: "Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, for emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources the prevention and/or treatment for conditions such as substance abuse or mental illness remains limited. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose a Page 193 of 354 one-tenth of a percent sales tax to fund additional mental health services in the city of Pasco." • 42% strongly support sales tax for mental health. • 31% somewhat support sales tax mental health. • 8% somewhat oppose sales tax mental health. • 12% strongly oppose sales tax mental health. • 7% responded "don't know" Regulation Changes to Allow Retail Marijuana: "In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate, license, and tax the production, processing, and sale of marijuana. Local jurisdictions have the option to prohibit or designate zones for state-licensed marijuana businesses. These businesses are currently prohibited in the city of Pasco. Council is now considering revisiting this prohibition. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose changing regulations to allow retail marijuana sales and related operations within Pasco city limits?" • 25% strongly support changes to regulations. • 20% somewhat support changes to regulations. • 9% somewhat oppose changes to regulations. • 37% strongly oppose changes to regulations. • 9% responded "don't know" Self-Select Online Participation For the fourth consecutive cycle, the City provided the option for the public to self - select online participation in the survey. There were 208 survey responses (289 - 2019; 131-2017) for this option, a decrease of 28% over 2019. Results of the self- select survey are included in the documents under the title "Council Districts Results." For comparison purposes, the following includes the statistically valid responses for as compared to the open participation survey: Quality of Life Statistically Valid Survey Open Participation Survey Overall quality of life 69% 72% Overall image/reputation 37% 42% Recommend Pasco as a place to live 76% 83% Remain in Pasco next 5 years 79% 87% Pasco as a place to visit 35% 48% Page 194 of 354 Pasco as a place to work 67% 64% City Services & Systems Statistically Valid Survey Open Participation Survey Overall customer service by City employees 57% 66% Quality of services provided by City 61% 61% Value of services for taxes paid to City 33% 43% Overall direction City is taking 56% 51% Overall confident in Pasco government 44% 41% Utility billing 64% 67% Police services 61% 70% Ambulance or emergency medical services 69% 86% Fire services 77% 88% Overall transportation system 51% 48% Overall feeling of safety 57% 48% Economic Development Statistically Valid Survey Open Participation Survey Variety of businesses and service establishments 45% 47% Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area 19% 28% Employment opportunities 56% 51% Shopping opportunities 37% 29% Engagement Statistically Valid Survey Open Participation Survey Contacted the City for help or information last 12 months 51% 56% Attended a local public meeting 14% 28% Page 195 of 354 Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds 49% 52% Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 43% 57% Policy Questions Statistically Valid Survey Open Participation Survey How much you would support or oppose adding City staff to manage a short-term rental program in our community? 50% 78% How much do you support or oppose a one-tenth of a percent sales tax to fund additional mental health services in the city of Pasco? 73% 84% How much do you would support oppose or changing regulations to allow retail marijuana sales and related operations within Pasco city limits? 45% 68% Council will note that, while there are variations, the online open participation survey results are generally keeping with the results of the random survey. These results are consistent with 2019 online open participation survey results. The survey tracks results by City Council voting district (Council District Report). Council may find areas of interest/concern from within individual voting districts. As a caution, given the relatively small numbers of respondents in some districts, the numbers should be weighed accordingly. 2021 2019 2017 District 1 23 13 21 District 2 28 22 21 District 3 49 60 50 District 4 43 35 35 District 5 37 54 71 District 6 22 23 17 Page 196 of 354 Survey Participation Regarding survey participation, 57% of the statistically valid survey respondents and 51% of the open participation respondents identified as not Hispanic (similar to 2019). The option to completed the survey (statistically valid and open participation) in Spanish was available as an online option: Completed in Spanish Statistically Valid Open Participation 2021 14 2 2019 2 0 In addition to the attached reports, results are also available online which can be organized by age, sex, race & Hispanic origin, housing tenure, housing type, length of residency, presence of children/older adults, and area (Council District). Page 197 of 354 200520072009201120132015201720192021Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to live Your neighborhood as a place to live Pasco as a place to raise children Pasco as a place to work Pasco as a place to visit Pasco as a place to retire The overall quality of life Sense of community Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Remain in Pasco for the next five years Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds 45% 69% 54% 35% 67% 71% 70% 72% 43% 61% 54% 33% 56% 73% 77% 85% 34% 69% 66% 39% 72% 60% 73% 77% 38% 59% 45% 34% 47% 61% 74% 66% 33% 69% 59% 43% 56% 63% 77% 69% 48% 64% 59% 63% 63% 71% 73% 53% 76% 60% 64% 62% 77% 78% 46% 52% 45% 57% 49% 63% 59% 56% 64% 54% 65% 66% 68% 75% 34% 45% 47% 43% 52% 57% 64% 43% 51% 57% 33% 47% 46% 59% 61% 64% 74% 51% 57% 63% 55% 48% 62% 53% 41% 45% 40% 40% 58% 53% 42% 40% 52% 49% 57% 48% 45% 44% 55%56% 79% 76% 81% 78% 83% 84% 80% 76% 85% 77% 83% 79% 85% 83% 82% 63% 54% 48% 82% 88% 62% 65% 66% 90% 61% 87% 59% 85% 60% 92% 54% 44% 61% 91% 51% 44% 60% 92% 41% 32% 64% 80% 53% 40% 69% 85% 58%63% Full trends This table contains the trends over time for the City of Pasco. The combined "percent positive" responses for each survey year are presented (e.g., excellent/good or yes). If an item was not included during an administration of the survey, no percentage will be shown in the table. If the difference between the 2019 and 2021 surveys is greater than nine percentage points, the change is statistically significant. It is important to note that in 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. Page 198 of 354 Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living Overall image or reputation Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of walking Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance Cleanliness Water resources Air quality Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care 42% 49% 53% 44% 67% 54% 37% 39% 37% 56% 19% 45% 56% 35% 45% 35% 47% 29% 54% 59% 34% 48% 40% 45% 23% 42% 23% 49% 35% 37% 14% 43% 28% 48% 31% 28% 18% 38% 32% 35% 40% 54% 37% 38% 48% 58% 35% 38% 33% 46% 35% 39% 55% 42% 46% 48% 63% 52% 52% 48% 50% 27% 37% 30% 42% 44% 42% 36% 45% 33% 57% 64% 49% 29% 66% 43% 53% 57% 71% 62% 47% 52% 62% 36% 44% 30% 50% 53% 43% 45% 49% 44% 62% 74% 66% 41% 59% 50% 59% 60% 65% 47% 45% 52% 41% 50% 46% 56% 52% 62% 66% 57% 49% 42% 49% 61% 64% 52% 44% 44% 48% 52% 41% 57% 57% 59% 72% 66% 47% 42% 53% 47% 56% 32% 33% 54% 54% 57% 31% 47% 35% 55% 67% 63% 47% 45% 59% 56% 38% 37% 66% 52% 57% 55% 53% 72% 55% 47% 62% 62% 45% 46% 73% 66% 70% 61% 67% 72% 54% 59% 48% 59% 33% 65% 52% 57% 55% 64% 53% 58% 47% 64% 48% 73% 55% 67% 63% 73% 65% Page 199 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diver.. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information Contacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinion Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Volunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Public information services Economic development Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Snow removal 43% 36% 37% 38% 30% 39% 36% 39% 45% 31% 29% 21% 27% 46% 47% 49% 34% 55% 47% 42% 49% 31% 51% 54% 30% 30% 33% 29% 53% 52% 66% 45% 60% 39% 44% 50% 57% 55% 48% 33% 49% 57% 60% 48% 47% 53% 39% 41% 41% 59% 53% 46% 36% 38% 53% 47% 45% 37% 45% 37% 29% 40% 54% 54% 38% 27% 30% 43% 51% 57% 51% 58% 50% 53% 47% 45% 49% 43% 63% 58% 72% 57% 63% 54% 47% 53% 54% 56% 50% 40% 51% 45% 54% 62% 41% 49% 42% 54% 56% 14% 66% 16% 27% 34% 14% 14% 51% 49% 55% 33% 68% 15% 31% 26% 22% 9% 44% 58% 56% 20% 18% 22% 36% 20% 14% 43% 41% 45% 28% 27% 37% 29% 21% 15% 44% 52% 47% 26% 20% 35% 30% 14% 15% 45% 57% 38% 47% 22% 46% 63% 40% 39% 19% 56% 51% 43% 41% 19% 71% 58% 41% 45% 31% 61% 50% 53% 48% 51% 51% 52% 50% 53% 57% 51% 51% 55% 55% 55% 47% 56% 49% 52% 56% 40% 53% 50% 59% 46% 48% 50% 41% 63% 46% 49% 39% 41% 61% 43% 51% 51% 60% 53% 57% 57% 46% 57% 57% 62% 53% 49% 63% 47% 65% 54% 59% 57% 44% 59% 53% 58% 57% 62% 54% 57% 63% 49% 55% Page 200 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Street lighting Snow removal Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Preservation of natural areas Pasco open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities Health services Public library services Overall customer service by Pasco employees Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco The overall direction that Pasco is taking The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Pasco government 57% 71% 54% 37% 34% 53% 53% 18% 41% 42% 47% 58% 77% 69% 41% 46% 61% 64% 77% 68% 75% 66% 80% 34% 35% 35% 56% 44% 36% 59% 75% 51% 32% 44% 57% 55% 24% 54% 49% 43% 69% 85% 82% 53% 61% 73% 54% 71% 81% 82% 86% 45% 37% 43% 70% 53% 42% 61% 77% 55% 50% 53% 68% 67% 46% 43% 51% 44% 68% 90% 92% 47% 62% 78% 62% 73% 76% 71% 82% 37% 38% 69% 42% 36% 57% 79% 48% 56% 50% 66% 66% 32% 47% 46% 40% 65% 87% 85% 36% 45% 63% 66% 69% 77% 64% 84% 31% 33% 64% 48% 51% 55% 69% 57% 38% 45% 56% 65% 34% 37% 42% 32% 62% 78% 73% 46% 50% 67% 56% 60% 65% 63% 76% 33% 36% 69% 49% 45% 71% 61% 58% 53% 53% 65% 66% 43% 51% 47% 70% 88% 84% 37% 56% 74% 68% 76% 65% 84% 27% 46% 73% 50% 47% 68% 76% 54% 51% 56% 65% 65% 51% 57% 53% 68% 88% 87% 43% 57% 71% 65% 73% 62% 83% 30% 45% 68% 47% 51% 60% 74% 53% 59% 68% 56% 52% 87% 73% 45% 43% 63% 63% 71% 54% 84% 39% 46% 77% 51% 46% 58% 68% 59% 69% 70% 61% 65% 89% 87% 53% 56% 70% 66% 69% 56% 85% 38% 53% 53% 45% 37% 56% 33% 49% 56% 50% 44% 46% 37% 38% 42% 45% 34% 51% 34% 40% 45% 49% 47% 60% 53% 48% 54% 51% 56% 61% 52% Page 201 of 354 Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Pasco government Generally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Pasco The Federal Government Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online Please rate your overall health. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your fa.. 48% 46% 43% 42% 48% 48% 44% 37% 60% 45% 40% 46% 51% 51% 43% 49% 50% 52% 43% 44% 44% 42% 39% 43% 34% 38% 46% 40% 40% 39% 34%40%47%48%56% 36% 61% 39% 62% 36% 63% 44% 60% 36% 64% 42% 61% 50% 69% 41% 58% 50% 69% 72% 73% 77% 81% 74% 92% 87% 90% 78% 89% 76% 86% 86% 91% 88% 94% 92% 87% 75% 92% 77% 78% 77% 70% 87% 74% 91% 82% 81% 73% 75% 91% 74% 89% 70% 81% 74% 68% 94% 56% 83% 50% 33% 93% 82% 96% 89% 50% 35% 92% 81% 90% 88% 63%68%43%47%55% 25%38%26%30%25%25%25%23%32% Page 202 of 354 Pasco, WA The National Community Survey Report of Results 2021 Report by: Visit us online! www.polco.us Page 203 of 354 About The NCS™ The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the “livability” of Pasco. A livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco. Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten central facets of a community:  • Economy  • Mobility  • Community Design  • Utilities  • Safety  • Natural Environment  • Parks and Recreation  • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture  • Inclusivity and Engagement The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 346 residents of the City of Pasco collected from November 17th, 2021 to January 12th, 2022. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 5% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2021 survey was 10%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Pasco. How the results are reported For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Comparisons to benchmarks NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 600 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Pasco's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower” than the benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Pasco residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means that Pasco's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “much higher” or “much lower,” then Pasco's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark. The survey was administered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of challenge for many local governments. While we provide comparisons to national benchmarks, it is important to note that much of the benchmark data was collected prior to the pandemic. This may impact how your City's 2021 ratings compare to other communities’ ratings from the past five years. Trends over time Trend data for Pasco represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines*. Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than nine percentage points between the 2019 and 2021 surveys, the change is statistically significant. * In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 1Page 204 of 354 About The NCS™The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the“livability” of Pasco. A livable community is a place that is not simplyhabitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, butwhere they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts fromNational Research Center at Polco.Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector,community-based organizations and residents, all geographicallyconnected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten centralfacets of a community: • Economy • Mobility • Community Design • Utilities • Safety • Natural Environment • Parks and Recreation • Health and Wellness • Education, Arts, and Culture • Inclusivity and EngagementThe report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 346residents of the City of Pasco collected from November 17th, 2021 toJanuary 12th, 2022. The margin of error around any reported percentage is5% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2021 survey was 10%.Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile ofrespondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults inPasco.How the results are reportedFor the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, thepercent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe,etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving thisreply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removedfrom the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondentswho had an opinion about a specific item.Comparisons to benchmarksNRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 600communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey. The comparisonevaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years. NRC adds the latest resultsquickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent awide geographic and population range. In each tab, Pasco's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower” thanthe benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Pasco residents is statistically similar toor different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means that Pasco'saverage rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “much higher” or“much lower,” then Pasco's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark.The survey was administered during the COVID-19 pandemic, a time of challenge for many local governments. While we providecomparisons to national benchmarks, it is important to note that much of the benchmark data was collected prior to thepandemic. This may impact how your City's 2021 ratings compare to other communities’ ratings from the past five years. Trends over time Trend data for Pasco represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines*. Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than nine percentage points between the 2019 and 2021 surveys, the change is statistically significant. * In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 2Page 205 of 354 Methods Selecting survey recipients All households within the City of Pasco were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Pasco was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Pasco households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Pasco boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey. Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of the six districts. From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units. An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within the household by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlying assumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction was contained in the introduction of the survey. Conducting the survey The 3,700 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on November 17th, 2021 and the survey remained open for 8 weeks. For 1,700 households, the first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. The final mailing contained a reminder letter, another survey, and a postage-paid return envelope. For the remaining 2,000 households, the first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate, followed one week later by a reminder postcard. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again. The survey was available in English and Spanish.  All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructing participants on how to complete the survey in their preferred language. About 3% of the 3,700 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,588 households that received the invitations to participate, 346 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 10%. The response rate was calculated using AAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons. It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying “confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Pasco survey is no greater than plus or minus five percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (346 completed surveys). In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Pasco. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 22nd, 2021. The survey remained open for three weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Pasco funded this research. Please contact Angela Pashon of the City of Pasco at pashona@pasco-wa.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2019 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Area District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Female Male Sex/age Female 18-34 Female 35-54 Female 55+ Male 18-34 Male 35-54 Male 55+ Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2019 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Pasco. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. 3Page 206 of 354 MethodsSelecting survey recipientsAll households within the City of Pasco were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codesserving Pasco was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some ofthe zip codes that serve the City of Pasco households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exactgeographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundaryfile. Addresses located outside of the City of Pasco boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of the six districts. From thatlist, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unitnumber) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units.An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within thehousehold by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlyingassumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction wascontained in the introduction of the survey.Conducting the surveyThe 3,700 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on November 17th, 2021 and the survey remained open for8 weeks. For 1,700 households, the first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The nextmailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. The finalmailing contained a reminder letter, another survey, and a postage-paid return envelope. For the remaining 2,000 households,the first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate, followed one week later by a reminder postcard. Allmailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked thosewho had not completed the survey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.The survey was available in English and Spanish.  All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructing participants onhow to complete the survey in their preferred language.About 3% of the 3,700 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postalservice was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,588 households that received the invitations toparticipate, 346 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 10%. The response rate was calculated usingAAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying“confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidenceinterval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinionsare relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Pasco survey is no greater than plus or minusfive percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (346 completed surveys).In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey waspublicized by the City of Pasco. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two smallupdates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and a question about where they heard about thesurvey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 22nd, 2021. The surveyremained open for three weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab atthe end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Pasco funded this research. Please contact Angela Pashon of the City of Pasco at pashona@pasco-wa.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2019 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Area District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Female Male Sex/age Female 18-34 Female 35-54 Female 55+ Male 18-34 Male 35-54 Male 55+ 26% 37% 38% 26% 37% 37% 60% 32% 8% 11% 18% 21% 24% 14% 12% 11% 18% 21% 24% 14% 12% 7% 33% 20% 30% 7% 5% 49% 51% 49% 51% 22% 78% 31% 69% 31% 69% 9% 91% 71% 29% 71% 29% 93% 7% 44% 56% 44% 56% 69% 31% 51% 49% 51% 49% 51% 49% 13% 19% 20% 13% 17% 18% 13% 19% 19% 13% 18% 18% 32% 15% 4% 27% 17% 4% Analyzing the data Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses. The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2019 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Pasco. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the probability sample are presented in the following table. NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. 4Page 207 of 354 MethodsSelecting survey recipientsAll households within the City of Pasco were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codesserving Pasco was purchased from Go-Dog Direct based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some ofthe zip codes that serve the City of Pasco households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exactgeographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundaryfile. Addresses located outside of the City of Pasco boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of the six districts. From thatlist, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unitnumber) sampled at a rate of 53 compared to single family housing units.An individual within each household was selected using the birthday method. The birthday method selects a person within thehousehold by asking the “person whose birthday has most recently passed” to complete the questionnaire. The underlyingassumption in this method is that day of birth has no relationship to the way people respond to surveys. This instruction wascontained in the introduction of the survey.Conducting the surveyThe 3,700 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on November 17th, 2021 and the survey remained open for8 weeks. For 1,700 households, the first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The nextmailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. The finalmailing contained a reminder letter, another survey, and a postage-paid return envelope. For the remaining 2,000 households,the first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate, followed one week later by a reminder postcard. Allmailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online. All follow-up mailings asked thosewho had not completed the survey to do so and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.The survey was available in English and Spanish.  All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructing participants onhow to complete the survey in their preferred language.About 3% of the 3,700 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postalservice was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 3,588 households that received the invitations toparticipate, 346 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 10%. The response rate was calculated usingAAPOR’s response rate #2* for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying“confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidenceinterval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinionsare relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Pasco survey is no greater than plus or minusfive percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (346 completed surveys).In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open participation survey waspublicized by the City of Pasco. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two smallupdates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and a question about where they heard about thesurvey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 22nd, 2021. The surveyremained open for three weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab atthe end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open participation respondents. The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month. On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item. Contact The City of Pasco funded this research. Please contact Angela Pashon of the City of Pasco at pashona@pasco-wa.gov if you have any questions about the survey. Survey Validity See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://info.polco.us/knowledge/statistical-vali * See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://www.aapor.org/Publications-Media/AAPOR-Journals/Standard-Definitions.aspx * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf * Targets come from the 2010 Census and 2019 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target*Age 18-3435-5455+Area District 1District 2District 3District 4District 5District 6Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or LatinoSpanish, Hispanic, or LatinoHousing tenure OwnRentHousing type AttachedDetachedRace & Hispanicorigin Not white aloneWhite alone, not Hispanic or LatinoSexFemaleMaleSex/age Female 18-34Female 35-54Female 55+Male 18-34Male 35-54Male 55+Analyzing the dataResponses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses areentered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Rangechecks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco weredownloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses.The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2010 Census and 2019 American CommunitySurvey estimates for adults in the City of Pasco. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the surveyrespondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race,Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculatedusing an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme forthe probability sample are presented in the following table.NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g.,age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups. 5Page 208 of 354 Highlights Economy continues to be a priority, and items related to employment in Pasco are on the rise. Residents indicated that Pasco’s economy should be a top priority for the City, with nearly 9 in 10 rating it an essential or very important focus area for the next two years. At least half of respondents provided favorable reviews of the City’s overall economic health, economic development, and overall quality of business and service establishments. All of these were on par with both the national benchmark comparisons and Pasco’s previous survey results. Residents’ evaluations related to working in the city were a bright spot in this survey iteration: Positive reviews of Pasco as a place to work increased since 2019 (from 56% to 67% excellent or good), as did ratings for the city’s employment opportunities (from 47% to 56%). A few aspects of the economy experienced slight declines, providing potential opportunities for focus in these other areas. Ratings for the variety of business and service establishments dipped from 54% to 45%, and the vibrancy of Pasco’s downtown/commercial area also decreased (from 29% to 19%). In a custom question unique to Pasco’s 2021 survey, participants were asked whether they would support changing City regulations to allow retail marijuana sales and related operations within Pasco city limits. Respondents were split on this issue: 45% reported that they strongly or somewhat supported this proposal, while 46% were opposed (most of whom voiced strong opposition), and about 10% didn’t know. While residents generally feel safe in Pasco, declining ratings in this area may indicate an opportunity for growth. Evaluations within the facet of safety tended to fall below the national benchmarks and Pasco’s prior survey results. While 8 in 10 respondents felt safe in their neighborhoods during the day and from natural disasters, both on par with the nation, just over half gave favorable reviews to the overall feeling of safety in Pasco. Residents’ self-reported feelings of safety from violent crime (63% very or somewhat safe), property crime (54%), and in Pasco’s downtown/commercial area during the day (48%) were all lower than the benchmarks, and the latter two also declined since 2019. Similar downward trends were seen across many safety-related services; ratings for police/sheriff services, crime prevention, animal control, ambulance/EMS, and fire prevention and education all decreased by at least 10% since the previous survey, which may warrant further attention. Community design is also a focus area for Pasco. Residents offered high ratings of importance (90% essential or very important) and relatively low ratings of quality (43% excellent or good) to Pasco’s overall community design, suggesting that this facet of livability may be an important focus area for the City. While about 7 in 10 residents gave favorable evaluations to their neighborhood as a place to live, roughly half positively reviewed the overall quality of new development and the city’s overall appearance. About 4 in 10 were pleased with the overall design or layout of Pasco’s residential and commercial areas, well-designed neighborhoods, well-planned commercial growth, and the preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community. The City’s code enforcement and land use, planning, and zoning received excellent or good reviews from about one-third of respondents. About 3 in 10 respondents or fewer gave favorable marks to well-planned residential growth, public places where people want to spend time, the variety of housing options, and the availability of affordable quality housing. Further, ratings for several of these items, including affordable quality housing availability, quality of new development, well-planned residential growth, and well-designed neighborhoods, declined from 2019 to 2021. In a question specific to Pasco’s survey this year, residents were asked to indicate their level of support for hiring additional City employees to manage a short-term rental program in the community. Roughly 50% of residents strongly or somewhat supported the proposal to add City staff for this purpose, while about one-third opposed the plan, and 15% abstained from providing an opinion. Residents value the City’s utility infrastructure. When asked which aspects of the community the City should focus on in the next two years, 87% of residents identified the overall utility infrastructure as a priority. Nearly two-thirds gave high marks to the quality of the utility infrastructure in Pasco, on par with peer comparison communities nationwide. Positive reviews for the City’s garbage collection (80% excellent or good), sewer services (75%), and storm water management (68%) remained strong and stable from 2019 results. While most utility ratings held steady over the years, fewer residents provided favorable marks this year to the City’s drinking water and affordable high-speed internet access. In contrast, more residents offered positive evaluations for utility billing services this year than in 2019. 6Page 209 of 354 Facets of livability Resident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview of community strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation. The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher than communities across the country (the national benchmark). 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community 45% 63% 40% 57% Similar 45% 63% 40% 57% Similar 57%51% Similar 57%51% Similar 41% 51% 42% 43% Lower41% 51% 42% 43% Lower 74%64% Similar 74%64% Similar 53%64%53%57% Lower53%64%53%57% Lower 58% 62% 61%52% Much lower 58% 62% 61%52% Much lower 59%43% Much lower 59%43% Much lower 48% 46%40% 47% Lower 48% 46%40% 47% Lower 55% 47%40% 45% Lower 55% 47%40% 45% Lower 33%34% Lower33%34% Lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. (% essential or very important) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Balancing performance and importance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 49% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 49% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 79% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 79%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring  closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. (vs. benchmark*) 7Page 210 of 354 Facets of livabilityResident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview ofcommunity strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation.The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and thepriority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher thancommunities across the country (the national benchmark).Overall economic healthOverall quality of the transportation systemOverall design or layout of residential and commercialareasOverall quality of the utility infrastructureOverall feeling of safetyOverall quality of natural environmentOverall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesOverall health and wellness opportunitiesOverall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsResidents' connection and engagement with theircommunityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community 91%92%89%89% Similar91%92%89%89% Similar 75%78% Similar75%78% Similar 74% 87%74%90% Higher74% 87%74%90% Higher 92%87% Similar 92%87% Similar 87%94%91%92% Similar87%94%91%92% Similar 70% 88%75%74% Similar70% 88%75%74% Similar 91%81% Similar 91%81% Similar 77%86%73% 77% Similar77%86%73% 77% Similar 78%86%81%73% Similar78%86%81%73% Similar 77% 76% 82%72% Similar77% 76% 82%72% Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. (% essential or very important) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Balancing performance and importance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 49% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 49% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 79% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 79%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring  closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. (vs. benchmark*) 8Page 211 of 354 Facets of livabilityResident perceptions of quality and importance for each of the facets of community livability provide an overview ofcommunity strengths and challenges that are useful for planning, budgeting and performance evaluation.The charts below show the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and thepriority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local ratings were lower, similar, or higher thancommunities across the country (the national benchmark).Overall economic healthOverall quality of the transportation systemOverall design or layout of residential and commercialareasOverall quality of the utility infrastructureOverall feeling of safetyOverall quality of natural environmentOverall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesOverall health and wellness opportunitiesOverall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsResidents' connection and engagement with theircommunityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good)Overall economic healthOverall quality of the transportation systemOverall design or layout of residential and commercialareasOverall quality of the utility infrastructureOverall feeling of safetyOverall quality of natural environmentOverall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesOverall health and wellness opportunitiesOverall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsResidents' connection and engagement with theircommunityPlease rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in thecoming two years.(% essential or very important)* Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Balancing performance and importance Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address. To help guide City staff and officials with decisions on future resource allocation, resident ratings of the importance of services were compared to their ratings of the quality of these services. To identify the services perceived by residents to have relatively lower quality at the same time as relatively higher importance, all services were ranked from highest perceived quality to lowest perceived quality and from highest perceived importance to lowest perceived importance. Some services were in the top half of both lists (higher quality and higher importance); some were in the top half of one list but the bottom half of the other (higher quality and lower importance or lower quality and higher importance); and some services were in the bottom half of both lists. Services receiving quality ratings of excellent or good by 49% or more of respondents were considered of “higher quality” and those with ratings lower than 49% were considered to be of “lower quality.” Services were classified as “more important” if they were rated as essential or very important by 79% or more of respondents. Services were rated as “less important” if they received a rating of less than 79%. This classification uses the median ratings for quality and importance to divide the services in half. The quadrants in the figure below show which community facets were given higher or lower importance ratings (right-left) and which had higher or lower quality ratings (up-down). Facets of livability falling closer to a diagonal line from the lower left to the upper right are those where performance ratings are more commensurate with resident priorities. Facets scoring  closest to the lower right hand corner of the matrix ( higher in importance and lower in quality) are those that may warrant further investigation to see if changes to their delivery are necessary to improve their performance. This is the key part of this chart on which to focus. Facets falling in the top left hand corner of the chart (lower in importance but higher in quality) are areas where performance may outscore resident priorities, and may be a consideration for lower resource allocation. 70%80%90% Importance 30% 40% 50% 60%QualityNatural environment Health and wellness Education, arts, and culture Community design Economy Inclusivity and engagement Mobility Parks and recreation Safety Utilities Median Median (vs. benchmark*) 9Page 212 of 354 Excellent 11% Good 57% Poor 7% Fair 25% The overall quality of life in Pasco, 2021 Quality of life Measuring community livability starts with assessing the quality of life of those who live there, and ensuring that the community is attractive, accessible, and welcoming to all. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Pasco as a place to live The overall quality of life 66% 77%72% Lower vs. benchmark* 85% 66% 77%72% Lower vs. benchmark* 59% 69% 61% 69% Lower59% 69% 61% 69% Lower Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Remain in Pasco for the next five years 76%84%78%76% Similar76%84%78%76% Similar 80%83%81%79% Similar80%83%81%79% Similar Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. (% very or somewhat likely) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall image or reputation 23% 34% 35% 37% Much lower23% 34% 35% 37% Much lower Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 10Page 213 of 354 Excellent 7% Good 35% Fair 35% Poor 23% Overall confidence in Pasco government, 2021 Governance Strong local governments produce results that meet the needs of residents while making the best use of available resources, and are responsive to the present and future needs of the community as a whole. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2015 2017 2019 2021 The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco The overall direction that Pasco is taking The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Pasco government Generally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect 45% 37% 50% 33% Lower 45% 37% 50% 33% Lower 42%46% 56%56% Similar42%46% 56%56% Similar 38% 44%49% 37% Similar38% 44%49% 37% Similar 44% 43% 34% 44% Similar 44% 43% 34% 44% Similar 43% 51%43%48% Similar43% 51%43%48% Similar 52%51% 39% 48% Similar 52%51% 39% 48% Similar Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall customer service by Pasco employees Public information services 57% 61%59%57% Lower vs. benchmark* 57% 61%59%57% Lower vs. benchmark* 63% 53% 55%50% Lower 63% 53% 55%50% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) The City of Pasco The Federal Government Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) 11Page 214 of 354 Overall confidence in Pascogovernment, 2021GovernanceStrong local governments produce results that meet the needsof residents while making the best use of available resources,and are responsive to the present and future needs of thecommunity as a whole. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. The value of services for the taxes paid to PascoThe overall direction that Pasco is takingThe job Pasco government does at welcoming residentinvolvementOverall confidence in Pasco governmentGenerally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect 52%51% 39% 48% Similar 52%51% 39% 48% Similar 46%42% Similar 46%42% Similar 40%43% Similar40%43% Similar 50% 45%42% 46% Similar 50% 45%42% 46% Similar 60%48% Similar 60%48% Similar Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance.(% excellent or good)Overall customer service by Pasco employeesPublic information servicesPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco.(% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 The City of Pasco The Federal Government 60%63%62%61% Similar60%63%62%61% Similar 44% 36% 39%36% Similar 44% 36% 39%36% Similar Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good) 12Page 215 of 354 Excellent 10% Good 45% Fair 36% Poor 9% Overall economic health of Pasco, 2021 Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative 9% 17% 41% 24% 8% What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Economy Local governments work together with private and nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a thriving local economy. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Pasco as a place to work Pasco as a place to visit 72% 47%56% 67% Similar 47%56% 67% Similar 39% 33%34% 35% Lower 39% 33%34% 35% Lower Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living 43% 42% 59%56% Similar 43% 42% 59%56% Similar 54%45% Similar 54%45% Similar 23%29% 14% 19% Lower 23%29% 14% 19% Lower 45%56% Similar 45%56% Similar Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) Economic development Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall economic health 63% 45%40% 57% Similar vs. benchmark* 45%40% 57% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 13Page 216 of 354 Overall economic health ofPasco, 2021 Very positiveSomewhatpositiveNeutralSomewhatnegativeVery negativeWhat impact, if any, do you think the economywill have on your family income in the next 6months? Do you think the impact will be:EconomyLocal governments work together with private andnonprofit businesses, and with the community atlarge, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs,and promote a thriving local economy.Pasco as a place to workPasco as a place to visitPlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of business and service establishmentsVariety of business and service establishmentsVibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living 37% 45% 47% 56% Similar 37% 45% 47% 56% Similar 35% 40% 35% 37% Lower35% 40% 35% 37% Lower 48% 45%49% 39% Similar48% 45%49% 39% Similar Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community.(% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Economic development 41%40% 55%52% Similar41%40% 55%52% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: 30% 26% 25% Similar 38%30% 26% 25% Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: (% very or somewhat positive) Overall economic healthPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 14Page 217 of 354 Excellent 9% Good 40%Fair 31% Poor 19% Overall quality of the transportation system in Pasco, 2021 Mobility The ease with which residents can move about their communities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work, and play in the community. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of walking 47% 49%41% 29% Lower 47% 49%41% 29% Lower 66%66%57%49% Similar57%49% Similar 72%66%74%64% Similar72%66%74%64% Similar 62%62%59%57% Higher 62%62%59%57% Higher 57%52%44% 33% Lower 57%52%44% 33% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Snow removal Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall quality of the transportation system 57%51% Similar vs. benchmark* 57%51% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) 15Page 218 of 354 Overall quality of the transportationsystem in Pasco, 2021MobilityThe ease with which residents can move about theircommunities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation,plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work,and play in the community. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Traffic flow on major streetsEase of public parkingEase of travel by carEase of travel by public transportationEase of travel by bicycle Ease of walking 57%56% 49% 45% Lower 57%56% 49% 45% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community.(% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving 20% 33%28% 14% Similar20% 33%28% 14% Similar 55% 45% 56% Higher56%55% 45% 56% Higher 58%49%41% 54% Similar49%41% 54% Similar Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Snow removal Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services 50% 56%55%51% Similar50% 56%55%51% Similar 48%52% 51% 51% Similar 48%52% 51% 51% Similar 46% 49% 51%48% Similar 46% 49% 51%48% Similar 59% 56% 57%53% Similar 59% 56% 57%53% Similar 50% 47% 53%50% Similar 50% 47% 53%50% Similar 51% 36% 42%36% Lower 51% 36% 42%36% Lower 48% 42% 53%44% Similar 48% 42% 53%44% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) Overall quality of the transportation systemPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) 16Page 219 of 354 Overall quality of the transportationsystem in Pasco, 2021MobilityThe ease with which residents can move about theircommunities, whether for commuting, leisure, or recreation,plays a major role in the quality of life for all who live, work,and play in the community. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Traffic flow on major streetsEase of public parkingEase of travel by carEase of travel by public transportationEase of travel by bicycleEase of walkingPlease also rate each of the following in the Pasco community.(% excellent or good)Used public transportation instead of drivingCarpooled with other adults or children instead of drivingaloneWalked or biked instead of drivingPlease indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.(% yes)Traffic enforcementTraffic signal timingStreet repairStreet cleaningStreet lightingSnow removal Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services 48% 42% 53%44% Similar 48% 42% 53%44% Similar 64%69%70%56% Similar64%69%70%56% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of the transportation systemPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) 17Page 220 of 354 Excellent 5% Good 34% Fair 40% Poor 20% Overall design or layout of Pasco's residential and commercial areas, 2021 Community design A well-designed community enhances the quality of life for its residents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, ensuring that affordable housing is accessible to all, and providing access to parks and other green spaces. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance 45%36% Lower 45%36% Lower 43%42% Similar43%42% Similar 53%44% Similar 53%44% Similar 50%42% Lower 50%42% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Your neighborhood as a place to live 74%73%77%70% Lower74%73%77%70% Lower Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. (% excellent or good) Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas 41%42% 43% Lower vs. benchmark* 51% 41%42% 43% Lower vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) 18Page 221 of 354 Overall design or layout ofPasco's residential andcommercial areas, 2021Community designA well-designed community enhances the quality of life for itsresidents by encouraging smart land use and zoning, ensuringthat affordable housing is accessible to all, and providingaccess to parks and other green spaces. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Well-planned residential growthWell-planned commercial growthWell-designed neighborhoodsPreservation of the historical or cultural character of thecommunity Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance 46% 30% 41%30% Much lower 46% 30% 41%30% Much lower 52% 50%44%37% Similar 52% 50%44%37% Similar 48% 41% 36%27% Similar 48% 41% 36%27% Similar 44%52% 62% 50% Similar44%52% 62% 50% Similar 44% 45% 52%48% Lower 44% 45% 52%48% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community.(% excellent or good)Your neighborhood as a place to livePlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco.(% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement 33%38% 43% 35% Similar33%38% 43% 35% Similar 31% 37%37%35% Similar31% 37%37%35% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) Overall design or layout of residential and commercialareasPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) 19Page 222 of 354 Excellent 15% Good 46% Fair 34% Poor 6% Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Pasco, 2021 Utilities Services such as water, gas, electricity, and internet access play a vital role in ensuring the physical and economic health and well-being of the communities they serve. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing 45%34% Lower 45%34% Lower 84%82%86%80% Similar84%82%86%80% Similar 82%64%71% 66% Similar64%71% 66% Similar 77%76%81%75% Similar77%76%81%75% Similar 69%73% 71% 68% Similar 69%73% 71% 68% Similar 77% Similar 77% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure 74%64% Similar vs. benchmark* 74%64% Similar vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) 20Page 223 of 354 Overall quality of the utilityinfrastructure in Pasco, 2021UtilitiesServices such as water, gas, electricity, and internet accessplay a vital role in ensuring the physical and economic healthand well-being of the communities they serve. * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. Affordable high-speed internet accessGarbage collectionDrinking waterSewer servicesStorm water managementPower (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing 62% 54% 66%64% Similar 62% 54% 66%64% Similar Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of the utility infrastructurePlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) 21Page 224 of 354 Excellent 13% Good 43% Fair 30% Poor 13% Overall feeling of safety in Pasco, 2021 Safety Public safety is often the most important task facing local governments. All residents should feel safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the greater community, and providing robust safety-related services is essential to residents' quality of life. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall feeling of safety 53% 53%57% Lower vs. benchmark* 64%53% 53%57% Lower vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 In your neighborhood during the day In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster 85%87%90%82% Similar85%87%90%82% Similar 59%61% 66%48% Much lower 59%61% 66%48% Much lower 65%54% Lower 65%54% Lower 62%63% Lower 62%63% Lower 88%82% Similar 88%82% Similar Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: (% very or somewhat safe) Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 22Page 225 of 354 Overall feeling of safety in Pasco,2021SafetyPublic safety is often the most important task facing localgovernments. All residents should feel safe and secure in theirneighborhoods and in the greater community, and providingrobust safety-related services is essential to residents' qualityof life.Overall feeling of safetyPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good)In your neighborhood during the dayIn Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the dayFrom property crimeFrom violent crimeFrom fire, flood, or other natural disasterPlease rate how safe or unsafe you feel:(% very or somewhat safe) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness 63% 78%73%61% Lower63% 78%73%61% Lower 45% 62%61% 46% Lower45% 62%61% 46% Lower 36% 47%53%41% Much lower36% 47%53%41% Much lower 85%92%82%69% Lower 85%92%82%69% Lower 87%90%85%77% Similar87%90%85%77% Similar 65% 68%69%58% Lower65% 68%69%58% Lower 40%44% 43% 47% Lower 40%44% 43% 47% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 23Page 226 of 354 Excellent 9% Good 41%Fair 32% Poor 18% Overall quality of natural environment in Pasco, 2021 Natural environment The natural environment plays a vital role in the health and well-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residents live and experience their communities has a direct and profound effect on quality of life. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Cleanliness Water resources Air quality 52% 47%47% 52% Lower 52% 47%47% 52% Lower 62%52% Similar 62%52% Similar 64%65%71%63% Lower64%65%71%63% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Preservation of natural areas Pasco open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up 46% 51%49%42% Lower46% 51%49%42% Lower 43% 54%47%41% Lower43% 54%47%41% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall quality of natural environment 58%62%61%52% Much lower vs. benchmark* 58%62%61%52% Much lower vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 24Page 227 of 354 Overall quality of naturalenvironment in Pasco, 2021Natural environmentThe natural environment plays a vital role in the health andwell-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residentslive and experience their communities has a direct andprofound effect on quality of life.CleanlinessWater resourcesAir qualityPlease also rate each of the following in the Pasco community.(% excellent or good)Preservation of natural areas Pasco open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up 32% 46% 24% 18% Much lower 32% 46% 24% 18% Much lower 66%67% 55% 53% Lower 66%67% 55% 53% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of natural environmentPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 25Page 228 of 354 Excellent 12% Good 31%Fair 39% Poor 19% Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities, 2021 Parks and recreation "There are no communities that pride themselves on their quality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location for businesses to relocate, or maintain that they are environmental stewards of their natural resources, without such communities having a robust, active system of parks and recreation programs for public use and enjoyment." - National Recreation and Park Association 2015 2017 2019 2021 Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities 61%60%57%48% Lower 61%60%57%48% Lower 59%53%49% 46% Lower 59%53%49% 46% Lower 42% 50% 43% 42% Much lower42% 50% 43% 42% Much lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities 66%68% 57% 53% Lower 66%68% 57% 53% Lower 50%53% 44% 34% Much lower 50%53% 44% 34% Much lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities 59%43% Much lower vs. benchmark* 59%43% Much lower vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 26Page 229 of 354 Overall quality of parks andrecreation opportunities, 2021Parks and recreation"There are no communities that pride themselves on theirquality of life, promote themselves as a desirable location forbusinesses to relocate, or maintain that they areenvironmental stewards of their natural resources, withoutsuch communities having a robust, active system of parks andrecreation programs for public use and enjoyment."- National Recreation and Park AssociationAvailability of paths and walking trailsFitness opportunitiesRecreational opportunitiesPlease also rate each of the following in the Pasco community.(% excellent or good)City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities 34% Much lower 34% Much lower 56%50% 32% 37% Much lower 56%50% 32% 37% Much lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco.(% excellent or good)Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunitiesPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 27Page 230 of 354 Excellent 10% Good 35% Fair 42% Poor 13% Overall health and wellness opportunities in Pasco, 2021 Health and wellness The characteristics of and amenities available in the communities in which people live has a direct impact on the health and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality of life overall. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care 59%66%55% Similar59%66%55% Similar 47% 60% 52%47% Lower47% 60% 52%47% Lower 53% 57% 53%46% Lower 53% 57% 53%46% Lower 49% 29%38%27% Lower 49% 29%38%27% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Health services 48%55%51% 54% Lower48%55%51% 54% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) Please rate your overall health. Please rate your overall health. (% excellent or very good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall health and wellness opportunities 48%46%40% 47% Lower vs. benchmark* 48%46%40% 47% Lower vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 28Page 231 of 354 Overall health and wellnessopportunities in Pasco, 2021Health and wellnessThe characteristics of and amenities available in thecommunities in which people live has a direct impact on thehealth and wellness of residents, and thus, on their quality oflife overall.Availability of affordable quality foodAvailability of affordable quality health careAvailability of preventive health servicesAvailability of affordable quality mental health carePlease also rate each of the following in the Pasco community.(% excellent or good)Health servicesPlease rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco.(% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Please rate your overall health.43% 68% 47% 63% Similar 43% 68% 47% 63% Similar Please rate your overall health. (% excellent or very good) Overall health and wellness opportunitiesPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 29Page 232 of 354 Excellent 9% Good 36%Fair 39% Poor 17% Overall opportunities for education, culture and the arts, 2021 Education, arts, and culture Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the local community. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities Opportunities to attend special events and festivals 36% 33% 33%21% Much lower 36% 33% 33%21% Much lower 30%29% Lower 30%29% Lower 46%48% 30% 31% Lower 46%48% 30% 31% Lower 53%55%54%45% Lower53%55%54%45% Lower 57% 51% 59%39% Similar 57% 51% 59%39% Similar 39% 47%39%38% Lower39% 47%39%38% Lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) Public library services Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts 55%47% 40% 45% Lower vs. benchmark* 47% 40% 45% Lower vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 30Page 233 of 354 Overall opportunities for education,culture and the arts, 2021Education, arts, and cultureParticipation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and incultural activities is linked to increased civic engagement,greater social tolerance, and enhanced enjoyment of the localcommunity.Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activitiesCommunity support for the artsAvailability of affordable quality childcare/preschoolK-12 educationAdult educational opportunitiesOpportunities to attend special events and festivalsPlease also rate each of the following in the Pasco community.(% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Public library services 79%77%75%71% Lower 79%77%75%71% Lower Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. (% excellent or good) Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the artsPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 31Page 234 of 354 Excellent 3% Good 29% Fair 50% Poor 18% Residents' connection and engagement with their community, 2021 Inclusivity and engagement Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to participate within their communities feel more included, involved, and engaged than those who do not. 2015 2017 2019 2021 Pasco as a place to raise children Pasco as a place to retire Sense of community 61%60% 73%71% Similar61%60% 73%71% Similar 45%54% 54% Similar66% 45%54% 54% Similar 38% 34% 43%45% Lower 38% 34% 43%45% Lower Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Residents' connection and engagement with their community 33%34% Lower vs. benchmark* 33%34% Lower vs. benchmark* Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. (% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 63%58% Similar 63%58% Similar Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. (% excellent or good) Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 32Page 235 of 354 Residents' connection andengagement with theircommunity, 2021Inclusivity and engagementInclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental feeling ofbelonging; residents who feel invited to participate within theircommunities feel more included, involved, and engaged thanthose who do not.Pasco as a place to raise childrenPasco as a place to retireSense of communityPlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco.(% excellent or good)Residents' connection and engagement with theircommunityPlease rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole.(% excellent or good) Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents 54%53% Similar 54%53% Similar 67%49% Similar 67%49% Similar 44%42% Similar 44%42% Similar Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following.(% excellent or good) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 31% 36% Lower31% 36% Lower 50%49% 41% 39% Lower 50%49% 41% 39% Lower 41%44%42% 30% Lower 41%44%42% 30% Lower 53%60%55% 37% Lower 53%60%55% 37% Lower 47%45% 34% 36% Lower 47%45% 34% 36% Lower 66% 48%49%43% Similar48%49%43% Similar Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. (% excellent or good) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 33Page 236 of 354 Residents' participation levels 2015 2017 2019 2021 Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information Contacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinion Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Volunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election 44% 43%44% 51% Similar vs. benchmark* 44% 43%44% 51% Similar vs. benchmark* 14%9% 15% 14% Similar 14%9% 15% 14% Similar 21% 20% 22%14% Similar 21% 20% 22%14% Similar 29% 36% 26% 34% Similar29% 36% 26% 34% Similar 37% 22% 31%27% Similar 37% 22% 31%27% Similar 18%15% 27% 16% Similar18%15% 27% 16% Similar 68%66% Lower68%66% Lower Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes) 2015 2017 2019 2021 Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online 88%89% Similar 88%89% Similar 90%96% Similar 90%96% Similar In general, how many times do you: (% a few times a week or more) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 34Page 237 of 354 Residents' participation levelsContacted the City of Pasco for help or informationContacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinionAttended a local public meetingWatched a local public meetingVolunteered your time to some group/activityCampaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidateVoted in your most recent local electionPlease indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.(% yes)Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online 90%96% Similar 90%96% Similar 81%82% Similar81%82% Similar 92%93% Similar 92%93% Similar 35%33% Similar 35%33% Similar 50%50% Similar50%50% Similar In general, how many times do you:(% a few times a week or more) * Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 35Page 238 of 354 Short-term rentals (overnight accommodations of less than 30 consecutive days, such as those provided by Airbnb, VRBO, FlipKey, etc.) are not currently permitted in Pasco. The City is considering creating an inspection program to manage short-term rentals, which would require hiring additional City staff to complete inspections and process licenses. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose adding City staff to manage a short-term rental program in our community. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Don't know Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources for the prevention and/or treatment for conditions such as substance abuse or mental illness remains limited. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose a one-tenth of a percent sales tax to fund additional mental health services in the city of Pasco. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Don't know In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate, license, and tax the production, processing, and sale of marijuana. Local jurisdictions have the option to prohibit or designate zones for state-licensed marijuana businesses. These businesses are currently prohibited in the city of Pasco. Council is now considering revisiting this prohibition. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose changing regulations to allow retail marijuana sales and related operations within Pasco city limits. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Don't know 15% 17% 18% 31% 19% 8% 12% 8% 31% 42% 10% 37% 9% 20% 25% Custom questions Below are the results of each custom question on the survey. Below are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. 36Page 239 of 354 % positiveRankNumber ofcommunitiesPercentilePlease rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to live Lower Your neighborhood as a place to live Lower Pasco as a place to raise children Similar Pasco as a place to work Similar Pasco as a place to visit Lower Pasco as a place to retire Similar The overall quality of life Lower Sense of community Lower Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall economic health Similar Overall quality of the transportation system Similar Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Lower Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Overall feeling of safety Lower Overall quality of natural environment Much lower Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Much lower Overall health and wellness opportunities Lower Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Lower Residents' connection and engagement with their community Lower Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Similar Remain in Pasco for the next five years Similar Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Similar In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day Much lower From property crime Lower 1132028372% 927324970% 2432324471% 5031415867% 727425535% 2232025054% 1534629169% 627325645% 3226117657% 401257551% 1125522743% 371227764% 1231227457% 226325752% 312712443% 725723847% 1025823245% 612311634% 1626522376% 1626221979% 729126882% 127727348% National benchmark tables This table contains the comparisons of Pasco's results to those from other communities. The first column shows the comparison of Pasco's rating to the benchmark. Pasco's results are noted as being “higher”, “lower” or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Pasco residents is statistically similar to or different than the benchmark. The second column is Pasco's “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good). The third column is the rank assigned to Pasco's rating among communities where a similar question was asked. The fourth column is the number of communities that asked a similar question. The fifth column shows the percentile for Pasco's result -- that is what percent of surveyed communities had a lower rating than Pasco. 37Page 240 of 354 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day Much lower From property crime Lower From violent crime Lower From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Similar Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Similar Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Similar Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Similar Taking care of vulnerable residents Similar Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Similar Variety of business and service establishments Similar Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Lower Employment opportunities Similar Shopping opportunities Lower Cost of living Similar Overall image or reputation Much lower Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Traffic flow on major streets Lower Ease of public parking Similar Ease of travel by car Similar Ease of travel by public transportation Higher Ease of travel by bicycle Lower Ease of walking Lower Well-planned residential growth Lower Well-planned commercial growth Similar Well-designed neighborhoods Similar Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the communi..Lower Public places where people want to spend time Much lower Variety of housing options Similar Availability of affordable quality housing Similar Overall quality of new development Similar Overall appearance Lower Cleanliness Lower Water resources Similar Air quality Lower 1113111754% 713112063% 521215882% 1712710658% 291258953% 1212511049% 211239742% 1726021656% 241229345% 1124521919% 752776856% 1826822037% 3525516639% 631529637% 1029026129% 3923814549% 3627517664% 792375057% 2227721533% 1427824045% 211259936% 271259242% 1812210044% 912111142% 225024630% 2126120737% 2828220427% 4527414950% 629627748% 1228324852% 261128352% 38Page 241 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Water resources Similar Air quality Lower Availability of paths and walking trails Lower Fitness opportunities Lower Recreational opportunities Much lower Availability of affordable quality food Similar Availability of affordable quality health care Lower Availability of preventive health services Lower Availability of affordable quality mental health care Lower Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Much lower Community support for the arts Lower Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Lower K-12 education Lower Adult educational opportunities Similar Sense of civic/community pride Lower Neighborliness of residents Lower Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Lower Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Lower Opportunities to volunteer Lower Opportunities to participate in community matters Lower Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of dive..Similar Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information Similar Contacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinion Similar Attended a local public meeting Similar Watched a local public meeting Similar Volunteered your time to some group/activity Similar Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Similar Voted in your most recent local election Lower Used public transportation instead of driving Similar Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Higher Walked or biked instead of driving Similar services in Pasco. Public information services Lower Economic development Similar 1424821463% 1328124548% 425024146% 327126242% 1824420055% 1425321847% 1424020646% 924021827% 226726021% 512211629% 925122831% 1425321745% 2124719439% 612211536% 325124239% 325724830% 325524838% 125425037% 325724936% 1227323943% 732927951% 2925117914% 1525121314% 832324034% 2925418127% 2224419016% 812411566% 4722612014% 932481756% 4025115054% 927024550%Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. 39Page 242 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Public information services Lower Economic development Similar Traffic enforcement Similar Traffic signal timing Similar Street repair Similar Street cleaning Similar Street lighting Similar Snow removal Lower Sidewalk maintenance Similar Bus or transit services Similar Land use, planning and zoning Similar Code enforcement Similar Affordable high-speed internet access Lower Garbage collection Similar Drinking water Similar Sewer services Similar Storm water management Similar Power (electric and/or gas) utility Similar Utility billing Similar Police/Sheriff services Lower Crime prevention Lower Animal control Much lower Ambulance or emergency medical services Lower Fire services Similar Fire prevention and education Lower Emergency preparedness Lower Preservation of natural areas Lower Pasco open space Lower Recycling Much lower Yard waste pick-up Lower City parks Lower Recreation programs or classes Much lower Recreation centers or facilities Much lower 4626314152% 2231124251% 4725513551% 3930618648% 2226820853% 2929821150% 722821136% 1726622044% 652328156% 1926921835% 2330323235% 1411910334% 5528713080% 4326215066% 5426812475% 5728312168% 522059877% 2623417464% 1233829861% 931028146% 128027641% 727425569% 829827477% 926424058% 726524547% 1024722342% 924121941% 128928518% 1424921453% 428327153% 227727234% 40Page 243 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Recreation programs or classes Much lower Recreation centers or facilities Much lower Health services Lower Public library services Lower Overall customer service by Pasco employees Lower Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco Lower The overall direction that Pasco is taking Similar The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Similar Overall confidence in Pasco government Similar Generally acting in the best interest of the community Similar Being honest Similar Being open and transparent to the public Similar Informing residents about issues facing the community Similar Treating all residents fairly Similar Treating residents with respect Similar Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each .. The City of Pasco Similar The Federal Government Similar Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Similar Overall quality of the transportation system Similar Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Much higher Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Similar Overall feeling of safety Similar Overall quality of natural environment Similar Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Similar Overall health and wellness opportunities Similar Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Similar Residents' connection and engagement with their community Similar In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Similar Access the internet from your cell phone Similar Visit social media sites Similar Use or check email Similar Share your opinions online Similar Shop online Similar 326225537% 1523520054% 828225871% 532530857% 1232828833% 3829117956% 1128925537% 1925720944% 2526119548% 2725318548% 241249542% 1513111243% 2225820046% 1612210348% 2131925061% 3524515936% 3523315189% 801212578% 99233390% 341208087% 5223311292% 1723319374% 571215281% 762335577% 4323313273% 4723312272% 612111489% 811212396% 761202982% 912111193% 641214433% 41Page 244 of 354 In general, how many times do you: Share your opinions online Similar Shop online Similar Please rate your overall health.Similar What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your fa..Similar 281218850% 602459763% 2824817925% 42Page 245 of 354 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to raise children Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to retire Excellent Good Fair Poor 7% 22% 52% 19% 7% 23% 44% 26% 8% 23% 47% 22% 12% 22% 50% 16% 21% 44% 25% 9% 29% 36% 18% Complete set of frequencies This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the survey. By default, "Don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. When a table for a question that only permitted a single response does not total to exactly 100%, it is due to the common practice of percentages being rounded to the nearest whole number. 43Page 246 of 354 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to retire Fair Poor The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 17% 7% 25% 57% 11% 19% 38% 37% 7% 9% 36% 45% 10% 19% 31% 40% 9% 20% 40% 34% 5% 6% 34% 46% 15% 44Page 247 of 354 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Poor Overall feeling of safety Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely 13% 30% 43% 13% 18% 32% 41% 9% 19% 39% 31% 12% 13% 42% 35% 10% 17% 39% 36% 9% 18% 50% 29% 3% 28% 45Page 248 of 354 Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Remain in Pasco for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe 12% 12% 47% 12% 11% 24% 53% 2% 5% 11% 32% 50% 8% 16% 31% 28% 17% 10% 19% 18% 38% 15% 17% 39% 22% 46Page 249 of 354 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: From violent crime Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair 8% 13% 2% 1% 14% 32% 51% 12% 31% 44% 13% 16% 28% 41% 15% 18% 32% 37% 13% 19% 37% 33% 10% 45% 11% 47Page 250 of 354 Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Cost of living Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation Excellent Good Fair Poor 14% 30% 14% 39% 36% 11% 30% 52% 11% 7% 13% 33% 35% 19% 32% 34% 28% 6% 27% 34% 30% 8% 38% 28% 6% 48Page 251 of 354 Overall image or reputation Fair Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Traffic flow on major streets Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of walking Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 29% 40% 36% 20% 4% 10% 42% 35% 13% 10% 27% 49% 13% 22% 23% 45% 10% 28% 38% 23% 11% 22% 35% 30% 13% Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. 49Page 252 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Ease of walking Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good 30% 37% 28% 5% 32% 30% 34% 5% 18% 39% 34% 9% 18% 40% 33% 9% 33% 39% 25% 4% 25% 41% 29% 4% 5% 50Page 253 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall appearance Excellent Good Fair Poor Cleanliness Excellent Good Fair Poor Water resources Excellent Good Fair Poor Air quality Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair 48% 27% 20% 15% 38% 31% 16% 20% 33% 39% 7% 14% 34% 47% 5% 19% 30% 38% 13% 6% 30% 51% 13% 40% 12% 51Page 254 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Availability of paths and walking trails Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of preventive health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Excellent Good Fair Poor 17% 31% 22% 31% 39% 8% 30% 29% 33% 8% 14% 30% 40% 17% 20% 34% 40% 7% 20% 35% 38% 8% 34% 22% 3% 52Page 255 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Availability of affordable quality mental health care Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Excellent Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 41% 35% 43% 15% 6% 31% 38% 25% 7% 35% 38% 26% 2% 17% 40% 34% 10% 21% 37% 22% 19% 21% 44% 30% 6% 53Page 256 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Sense of civic/community pride Poor Neighborliness of residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information No Yes 19% 42% 31% 8% 16% 53% 22% 8% 20% 39% 32% 9% 15% 47% 27% 12% 16% 48% 26% 9% 14% 43% 28% 15% 49% Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. 54Page 257 of 354 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information No Yes Contacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting No Yes Watched a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes Voted in your most recent local election No Yes Used public transportation instead of driving No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Public information services Excellent Good Fair Poor Economic development Excellent Good Fair 51% 13% 87% 15% 85% 34% 66% 28% 72% 17% 83% 72% 28% 12% 88% 53% 47% 52% 48% 10% 39% 41% 10% 35% 15% 55Page 258 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Economic development Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor Street lighting Excellent Good Fair Poor Snow removal Excellent Good Fair Poor 14% 36% 11% 39% 40% 10% 17% 32% 38% 13% 24% 30% 40% 6% 14% 35% 44% 8% 10% 40% 40% 10% 47% 29% 7% 56Page 259 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Snow removal Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Excellent Good Fair Poor Land use, planning and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor Code enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 17% 25% 30% 39% 5% 17% 28% 38% 17% 28% 36% 32% 4% 26% 38% 30% 6% 26% 41% 29% 4% 2% 18% 43% 37% 57Page 260 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Garbage collection Poor Drinking water Excellent Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Poor Storm water management Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair Poor Police/Sheriff services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good 7% 26% 42% 25% 2% 22% 43% 33% 6% 26% 45% 23% 1% 22% 52% 25% 8% 29% 42% 20% 12% 27% 35% 27% 10% 58Page 261 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair Poor Emergency preparedness Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas Excellent Good Fair 19% 36% 35% 35% 27% 29% 9% 7% 25% 38% 30% 3% 22% 44% 32% 10% 32% 34% 24% 25% 26% 33% 16% 30% 15% 59Page 262 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Preservation of natural areas Good Fair Poor Pasco open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good Fair Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent Good Fair Poor 19% 36% 20% 40% 28% 13% 47% 34% 15% 4% 18% 28% 30% 24% 13% 35% 37% 15% 25% 40% 22% 13% 37% 28% 10% 60Page 263 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Recreation centers or facilities Fair Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Pasco employees Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall direction that Pasco is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 26% 19% 29% 43% 9% 6% 21% 47% 26% 19% 23% 42% 17% 25% 43% 25% 7% 17% 30% 41% 13% 26% 36% 27% 12% 61Page 264 of 354 Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Poor Overall confidence in Pasco government Excellent Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Excellent Good Fair Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good 23% 35% 35% 7% 18% 34% 40% 8% 19% 34% 36% 10% 25% 35% 29% 11% 34% 26% 30% 10% 24% 30% 35% 11% 13% 62Page 265 of 354 Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Pasco Excellent Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essential Very important Somewhat important 15% 37% 34% 6% 35% 47% 12% 28% 40% 26% 7% 0% 12% 43% 45% 2% 23% 41% 34% 0% 11% 40% 49% 42% 43% 63Page 266 of 354 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall feeling of safety Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important 0% 15% 0% 9% 35% 56% 2% 27% 42% 29% 2% 19% 52% 27% 4% 21% 39% 35% 6% 22% 39% 32% 25% 43% 26% 64Page 267 of 354 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Residents' connection and engagement with their community Somewhat important Not at all important Short-term rentals (overnight accommodations of less than 30 consecutive days, such as those provided by Airbnb, VRBO, FlipKey, etc.) are not currently permitted in Pasco. The City is considering creating an inspection program to manage short-term rentals, which would require hiring additional City staff to complete inspections and process licenses. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose adding City staff to manage a short-term rental program in our community. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources for the prevention and/or treatment for conditions such as substance abuse or mental illness remains limited. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose a one-tenth of a percent sales tax to fund additional mental health services in the city of Pasco. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate, license, and tax the production, processing, and sale of marijuana. Local jurisdictions have the option to prohibit or designate zones for state-licensed marijuana businesses. These businesses are currently prohibited in the city of Pasco. Council is now considering revisiting this prohibition. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose changing regulations to allow retail marijuana sales and related operations within Pasco city limits. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Visit social media sites Several times a day Once a day A few times a week 6% 20% 21% 36% 22% 13% 9% 33% 45% 41% 10% 22% 28% 8% 3% 10% 9% 69% 4% 0% 7% 4% 84% 8% 61% 65Page 268 of 354 In general, how many times do you: Visit social media sites Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Share your opinions online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Please rate your overall health.Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral 15% 4% 13% 4% 2% 14% 9% 70% 53% 13% 23% 1% 10% 27% 25% 26% 4% 17% 0% 7% 31% 37% 25% 17% 9% 66Page 269 of 354 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative How many years have you lived in Pasco?Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in?One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apa.. Mobile home Other Do you rent or own your home?Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? Less than $500 $500 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 to $2,499 $2,500 to $2,999 $3,000 to $3,499 $3,500 or more Do any children 17 or under live in your household?No Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes 8% 24% 41% 33% 23% 15% 24% 7% 1% 4% 26% 70% 72% 28% 0% 1% 6% 6% 29% 32% 17% 9% 38% 62% 73% 67Page 270 of 354 Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander Black or African American White Other In which category is your age?18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender?Female Male 27% 14% 15% 15% 16% 22% 19% 43% 57% 20% 79% 1% 4% 2% 9% 11% 9% 20% 14% 34% 3% 53% 47% 68Page 271 of 354 200520072009201120132015201720192021Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to live Your neighborhood as a place to live Pasco as a place to raise children Pasco as a place to work Pasco as a place to visit Pasco as a place to retire The overall quality of life Sense of community Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Remain in Pasco for the next five years Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds 45% 69% 54% 35% 67% 71% 70% 72% 43% 61% 54% 33% 56% 73% 77% 85% 34% 69% 66% 39% 72% 60% 73% 77% 38% 59% 45% 34% 47% 61% 74% 66% 33% 69% 59% 43% 56% 63% 77% 69% 48% 64% 59% 63% 63% 71% 73% 53% 76% 60% 64% 62% 77% 78% 46% 52% 45% 57% 49% 63% 59% 56% 64% 54% 65% 66% 68% 75% 34% 45% 47% 43% 52% 57% 64% 43% 51% 57% 33% 47% 46% 59% 61% 64% 74% 51% 57% 63% 55% 48% 62% 53% 41% 45% 40% 40% 58% 53% 42% 40% 52% 49% 57% 48% 45% 44% 55%56% 79% 76% 81% 78% 83% 84% 80% 76% 85% 77% 83% 79% 85% 83% 82% 63% 54% 48% 82% 88% 62% 65% 66% 90% 61% 87% 59% 85% 60% 92% 54% 44% 61% 91% 51% 44% 60% 92% 41% 32% 64% 80% 53% 40% 69% 85% 58%63% Full trends This table contains the trends over time for the City of Pasco. The combined "percent positive" responses for each survey year are presented (e.g., excellent/good or yes). If an item was not included during an administration of the survey, no percentage will be shown in the table. If the difference between the 2019 and 2021 surveys is greater than nine percentage points, the change is statistically significant. It is important to note that in 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent. 69Page 272 of 354 Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living Overall image or reputation Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of walking Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance Cleanliness Water resources Air quality Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care 42% 49% 53% 44% 67% 54% 37% 39% 37% 56% 19% 45% 56% 35% 45% 35% 47% 29% 54% 59% 34% 48% 40% 45% 23% 42% 23% 49% 35% 37% 14% 43% 28% 48% 31% 28% 18% 38% 32% 35% 40% 54% 37% 38% 48% 58% 35% 38% 33% 46% 35% 39% 55% 42% 46% 48% 63% 52% 52% 48% 50% 27% 37% 30% 42% 44% 42% 36% 45% 33% 57% 64% 49% 29% 66% 43% 53% 57% 71% 62% 47% 52% 62% 36% 44% 30% 50% 53% 43% 45% 49% 44% 62% 74% 66% 41% 59% 50% 59% 60% 65% 47% 45% 52% 41% 50% 46% 56% 52% 62% 66% 57% 49% 42% 49% 61% 64% 52% 44% 44% 48% 52% 41% 57% 57% 59% 72% 66% 47% 42% 53% 47% 56% 32% 33% 54% 54% 57% 31% 47% 35% 55% 67% 63% 47% 45% 59% 56% 38% 37% 66% 52% 57% 55% 53% 72% 55% 47% 62% 62% 45% 46% 73% 66% 70% 61% 67% 72% 54% 59% 48% 59% 33% 65% 52% 57% 55% 64% 53% 58% 47% 64% 48% 73% 55% 67% 63% 73% 65% 70Page 273 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diver.. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information Contacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinion Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Volunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Public information services Economic development Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Snow removal 43% 36% 37% 38% 30% 39% 36% 39% 45% 31% 29% 21% 27% 46% 47% 49% 34% 55% 47% 42% 49% 31% 51% 54% 30% 30% 33% 29% 53% 52% 66% 45% 60% 39% 44% 50% 57% 55% 48% 33% 49% 57% 60% 48% 47% 53% 39% 41% 41% 59% 53% 46% 36% 38% 53% 47% 45% 37% 45% 37% 29% 40% 54% 54% 38% 27% 30% 43% 51% 57% 51% 58% 50% 53% 47% 45% 49% 43% 63% 58% 72% 57% 63% 54% 47% 53% 54% 56% 50% 40% 51% 45% 54% 62% 41% 49% 42% 54% 56% 14% 66% 16% 27% 34% 14% 14% 51% 49% 55% 33% 68% 15% 31% 26% 22% 9% 44% 58% 56% 20% 18% 22% 36% 20% 14% 43% 41% 45% 28% 27% 37% 29% 21% 15% 44% 52% 47% 26% 20% 35% 30% 14% 15% 45% 57% 38% 47% 22% 46% 63% 40% 39% 19% 56% 51% 43% 41% 19% 71% 58% 41% 45% 31% 61% 50% 53% 48% 51% 51% 52% 50% 53% 57% 51% 51% 55% 55% 55% 47% 56% 49% 52% 56% 40% 53% 50% 59% 46% 48% 50% 41% 63% 46% 49% 39% 41% 61% 43% 51% 51% 60% 53% 57% 57% 46% 57% 57% 62% 53% 49% 63% 47% 65% 54% 59% 57% 44% 59% 53% 58% 57% 62% 54% 57% 63% 49% 55% 71Page 274 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Street lighting Snow removal Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Preservation of natural areas Pasco open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities Health services Public library services Overall customer service by Pasco employees Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco The overall direction that Pasco is taking The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Pasco government 57% 71% 54% 37% 34% 53% 53% 18% 41% 42% 47% 58% 77% 69% 41% 46% 61% 64% 77% 68% 75% 66% 80% 34% 35% 35% 56% 44% 36% 59% 75% 51% 32% 44% 57% 55% 24% 54% 49% 43% 69% 85% 82% 53% 61% 73% 54% 71% 81% 82% 86% 45% 37% 43% 70% 53% 42% 61% 77% 55% 50% 53% 68% 67% 46% 43% 51% 44% 68% 90% 92% 47% 62% 78% 62% 73% 76% 71% 82% 37% 38% 69% 42% 36% 57% 79% 48% 56% 50% 66% 66% 32% 47% 46% 40% 65% 87% 85% 36% 45% 63% 66% 69% 77% 64% 84% 31% 33% 64% 48% 51% 55% 69% 57% 38% 45% 56% 65% 34% 37% 42% 32% 62% 78% 73% 46% 50% 67% 56% 60% 65% 63% 76% 33% 36% 69% 49% 45% 71% 61% 58% 53% 53% 65% 66% 43% 51% 47% 70% 88% 84% 37% 56% 74% 68% 76% 65% 84% 27% 46% 73% 50% 47% 68% 76% 54% 51% 56% 65% 65% 51% 57% 53% 68% 88% 87% 43% 57% 71% 65% 73% 62% 83% 30% 45% 68% 47% 51% 60% 74% 53% 59% 68% 56% 52% 87% 73% 45% 43% 63% 63% 71% 54% 84% 39% 46% 77% 51% 46% 58% 68% 59% 69% 70% 61% 65% 89% 87% 53% 56% 70% 66% 69% 56% 85% 38% 53% 53% 45% 37% 56% 33% 49% 56% 50% 44% 46% 37% 38% 42% 45% 34% 51% 34% 40% 45% 49% 47% 60% 53% 48% 54% 51% 56% 61% 52% 72Page 275 of 354 Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Pasco government Generally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Pasco The Federal Government Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online Please rate your overall health. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your fa.. 48% 46% 43% 42% 48% 48% 44% 37% 60% 45% 40% 46% 51% 51% 43% 49% 50% 52% 43% 44% 44% 42% 39% 43% 34% 38% 46% 40% 40% 39% 34%40%47%48%56% 36% 61% 39% 62% 36% 63% 44% 60% 36% 64% 42% 61% 50% 69% 41% 58% 50% 69% 72% 73% 77% 81% 74% 92% 87% 90% 78% 89% 76% 86% 86% 91% 88% 94% 92% 87% 75% 92% 77% 78% 77% 70% 87% 74% 91% 82% 81% 73% 75% 91% 74% 89% 70% 81% 74% 68% 94% 56% 83% 50% 33% 93% 82% 96% 89% 50% 35% 92% 81% 90% 88% 63%68%43%47%55% 25%38%26%30%25%25%25%23%32% 73Page 276 of 354 Methods (open participation) As part of its participation in The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™), the City of Pasco conducted a survey of 346 residents. Survey invitations were mailed to randomly selected households and data were collected from November 17th, 2021 to January 12th, 2022. The results from this main survey effort represent the most robust estimate of your residents’ opinions. After the above data collection period was underway, a link to an online open participation survey was publicized by the City of Pasco. The open participation survey was identical to the probability sample survey with two small updates; it included a map at the beginning asking where the respondent lives and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on December 22nd, 2021. The survey remained open for three weeks and there were 208 responses. The open participation survey data were not collected through a random sample and it is unknown who in the community was aware of the survey; therefore, a level of confidence in the representativeness of the sample cannot be estimated. However, to reduce bias where possible, these data were statistically weighted to match the demographic characteristics of the 2010 Census and 2019 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Pasco. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.* The results of the weighting scheme for the open participation survey are presented in the following table. * Pasek, J. (2010). ANES Weighting Algorithm.  Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/iriss/cgi-bin/anesrake/resources/RakingDescription.pdf Unweighted Weighted Target* Age 18-34 35-54 55+ Area District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 District 6 Hispanic origin No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispa.. Housing tenure Own Rent Housing type Attached Detached Race & Hispanic origin Not white alone White alone, not Hispanic or Latino Sex Female Male Sex/age Female 18-34 Female 35-54 Female 55+ Male 18-34 Male 35-54 Male 55+ 26% 37% 38% 26% 36% 38% 35% 48% 17% 11% 18% 21% 24% 14% 12% 11% 18% 21% 24% 14% 12% 6% 34% 18% 27% 8% 8% 49% 51% 49% 51% 23% 77% 31% 69% 31% 69% 13% 87% 71% 29% 71% 29% 93% 7% 44% 56% 44% 56% 67% 33% 51% 49% 51% 49% 44% 56% 13% 19% 20% 13% 17% 18% 13% 19% 20% 13% 17% 18% 14% 23% 7% 18% 28% 11% 74Page 277 of 354 In which district of Pasco do you live? (Refer to map above.) Council District 1 Council District 2 Council District 3 Council District 4 Council District 5 Council District 6 None of these/I don't live in Pasco Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to raise children Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to retire Excellent Good 1% 11% 18% 21% 24% 14% 11% 4% 32% 39% 25% 6% 17% 42% 35% 8% 22% 44% 26% 5% 31% 47% 17% 21% 30% 36% 12% 23% Open participation survey results This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the open participation survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. When a table for a question that only permitted a single response does not total to exactly 100%, it is due to the common practice of percentages being rounded to the nearest whole number. 75Page 278 of 354 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to retire Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall feeling of safety Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good 14% 31% 31% 6% 23% 51% 21% 16% 31% 41% 11% 7% 30% 52% 11% 21% 33% 37% 9% 23% 32% 41% 4% 6% 20% 59% 16% 16% 36% 35% 13% 11% 76Page 279 of 354 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Remain in Pasco for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Very safe 15% 33% 41% 21% 29% 38% 11% 17% 36% 38% 9% 23% 42% 27% 9% 27% 47% 19% 6% 7% 9% 49% 34% 8% 5% 28% 59% 5% 0% 7% 27% 61% 77Page 280 of 354 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very unsafe In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 8% 21% 13% 36% 22% 7% 17% 19% 42% 15% 4% 11% 14% 41% 30% 1% 1% 9% 34% 55% 10% 35% 44% 10% 10% 29% 43% 18% 14% 34% 31% 21% 78Page 281 of 354 Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Cost of living Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 26% 41% 25% 8% 12% 26% 53% 9% 20% 33% 41% 6% 35% 37% 24% 4% 10% 39% 40% 11% 38% 34% 25% 4% 15% 52% 23% 10% 23% 34% 34% 8% 79Page 282 of 354 Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community.Overall image or reputation Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Traffic flow on major streets Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of walking Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 30% 36% 29% 5% 13% 34% 44% 9% 5% 26% 49% 19% 21% 29% 40% 10% 23% 35% 27% 15% 19% 34% 32% 16% 28% 37% 31% 3% 36% 25% 32% 7% 80Page 283 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Well-planned commercial growth Poor Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall appearance Excellent Good Fair Poor Cleanliness Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 18% 35% 43% 4% 28% 33% 31% 8% 34% 37% 23% 6% 24% 41% 28% 8% 47% 35% 12% 6% 12% 41% 35% 12% 15% 38% 39% 7% 18% 35% 34% 13% 81Page 284 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Cleanliness Poor Water resources Excellent Good Fair Poor Air quality Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of preventive health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 20% 30% 36% 14% 3% 26% 47% 24% 14% 27% 43% 15% 18% 33% 42% 8% 24% 32% 36% 8% 15% 25% 45% 16% 21% 38% 31% 10% 17% 45% 30% 8% 82Page 285 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Availability of preventive health services Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Excellent Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good Fair Poor Neighborliness of residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 39% 41% 17% 3% 44% 31% 19% 5% 40% 34% 20% 5% 47% 36% 10% 7% 8% 38% 42% 11% 14% 36% 44% 6% 23% 37% 26% 13% 9% 46% 37% 8% 83Page 286 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Neighborliness of residents Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information No Yes Contacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting No Yes Watched a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes No 35% 33% 26% 7% 28% 37% 24% 12% 15% 37% 37% 11% 24% 37% 29% 11% 12% 31% 36% 21% 56% 44% 26% 74% 28% 72% 60% 40% 38% 62% 30% 70% 84Page 287 of 354 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Yes Voted in your most recent local election No Yes Used public transportation instead of driving No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Public information services Excellent Good Fair Poor Economic development Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 74% 26% 14% 86% 50% 50% 48% 52% 17% 37% 34% 12% 14% 34% 40% 11% 18% 33% 40% 9% 20% 33% 38% 8% 20% 37% 37% 5% 15% 30% 47% 9% 85Page 288 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Street cleaning Poor Street lighting Excellent Good Fair Poor Snow removal Excellent Good Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Excellent Good Fair Poor Land use, planning and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor Code enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 15% 34% 44% 8% 23% 32% 32% 13% 13% 35% 44% 8% 6% 38% 48% 8% 27% 38% 27% 8% 28% 34% 29% 9% 24% 33% 32% 11% 4% 21% 39% 36% 86Page 289 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Garbage collection Poor Drinking water Excellent Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Poor Storm water management Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair Poor Police/Sheriff services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 8% 24% 33% 34% 4% 17% 48% 31% 6% 23% 40% 31% 2% 23% 42% 34% 9% 24% 40% 27% 12% 18% 37% 33% 13% 28% 39% 20% 28% 22% 42% 8% 87Page 290 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Animal control Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair Poor Emergency preparedness Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good Fair Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 2% 12% 50% 36% 0% 12% 41% 47% 11% 17% 41% 32% 26% 19% 38% 18% 26% 27% 28% 19% 24% 35% 30% 11% 63% 19% 14% 3% 28% 35% 22% 15% 88Page 291 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Yard waste pick-up Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent Good Fair Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Pasco employees Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall direction that Pasco is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 28% 31% 27% 14% 30% 34% 28% 8% 33% 31% 30% 6% 14% 47% 32% 7% 12% 19% 42% 27% 8% 26% 44% 22% 24% 33% 34% 9% 21% 28% 37% 14% 89Page 292 of 354 Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The overall direction that Pasco is taking Poor The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Pasco government Excellent Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Excellent Good Fair Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 20% 37% 30% 13% 21% 38% 28% 13% 22% 27% 37% 14% 19% 30% 34% 17% 20% 36% 29% 16% 33% 26% 30% 11% 24% 29% 34% 13% 15% 27% 44% 14% 90Page 293 of 354 Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance.Treating residents with respect Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Pasco Excellent Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall feeling of safety Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important 11% 29% 43% 18% 26% 42% 30% 2% 7% 42% 51% 5% 16% 41% 38% 3% 7% 43% 47% 0% 13% 40% 47% 0% 2% 38% 60% 2% 22% 44% 32% 40% 91Page 294 of 354 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Short-term rentals (overnight accommodations of less than 30 consecutive days, such as those provided by Airbnb, VRBO, FlipKey, etc.) are not currently permitted in Pasco. The City is considering creating an inspection program to manage short-term rentals, which would require hiring additional City staff to complete inspection.. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources for the prevention and/or treatment for conditions such as substance abuse or mental illness remains limited. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose a one-tenth of a percent sales tax to fund additional mental he.. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate, license, and tax the production, processing, and sale of marijuana. Local jurisdictions have the option to prohibit or designate zones for state-licensed marijuana businesses. These businesses are currently prohibited in the city of Pasco. Council is now cons.. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose In general, how many times do you:Access the internet from your home Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Several times a day 0% 16% 45% 2% 13% 42% 43% 2% 19% 33% 46% 2% 22% 35% 41% 14% 8% 32% 46% 9% 7% 24% 60% 22% 10% 10% 58% 1% 3% 5% 5% 85% 92Page 295 of 354 In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Less often or never Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day Every few weeks Less often or never Visit social media sites Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Share your opinions online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Please rate your overall health.Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative Less than 2 years 0% 0% 2% 97% 1% 0% 1% 19% 79% 4% 16% 80% 47% 9% 23% 6% 15% 6% 22% 41% 8% 23% 1% 3% 29% 43% 25% 6% 20% 33% 28% 13% 93Page 296 of 354 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:Very negative How many years have you lived in Pasco?Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in?One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apa.. Mobile home Other Do you rent or own your home?Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? Less than $500 $500 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 to $2,499 $2,500 to $2,999 $3,000 to $3,499 $3,500 or more Do any children 17 or under live in your household?No Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Are you Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino?Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander 49% 17% 12% 12% 9% 5% 1% 28% 67% 69% 31% 0% 2% 4% 10% 24% 35% 17% 8% 45% 55% 25% 75% 15% 19% 19% 16% 27% 4% 49% 51% 1% 94Page 297 of 354 What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander Black or African American White Other In which category is your age?18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender?Female Male Identify in another way How did you hear about this survey? (Select all that apply.) The City's website The City's social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,.. Received an email from the City In a City newsletter or utility bill Received a postcard or letter from the City Nextdoor In my Facebook feed Saw it on a video of a public meeting or at a meeting I atten.. Saw it on the City's cable channel Saw it in a newspaper article or ad (hard copy or online Heard about it from a family member, friend or neighborhood Heard about it from a business or social organization in my co.. Polco social media post On my Polco feed Other 26% 75% 0% 2% 4% 9% 12% 10% 26% 24% 14% 0% 52% 48% 7% 0% 2% 2% 8% 2% 0% 0% 28% 0% 1% 1% 8% 46% 9% 95Page 298 of 354 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2021 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Pasco 2021 Community Survey Page 1 of 5 Please complete this survey if you are the adult (age 18 or older) in the household who most recently had a birthday (the year of birth does not matter). Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. 1. Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Pasco as a place to live ........................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Your neighborhood as a place to live .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Pasco as a place to raise children ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Pasco as a place to work ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Pasco as a place to visit ......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Pasco as a place to retire ...................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 The overall quality of life in Pasco .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of community ................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall economic health of Pasco ..................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Pasco .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall design or layout of Pasco’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Pasco (water, sewer, storm water, electric, gas) ................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall feeling of safety in Pasco ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of natural environment in Pasco ....................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Pasco ................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .......................... 1 2 3 4 5 3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t likely likely unlikely unlikely know Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks .............................1 2 3 4 5 Remain in Pasco for the next five years ...................................................1 2 3 4 5 4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: Very Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don’t safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know In your neighborhood during the day ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 In Pasco’s downtown/commercial area during the day ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From property crime ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From violent crime ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 From fire, flood, or other natural disaster ............................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 5. Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Making all residents feel welcome ................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Attracting people from diverse backgrounds .............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) ........... 1 2 3 4 5 6. Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Overall quality of business and service establishments in Pasco ....................... 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of business and service establishments in Pasco ....................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Employment opportunities ................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Shopping opportunities ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Cost of living in Pasco ............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall image or reputation of Pasco .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Page 299 of 354 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2021 National Research Center, Inc. Page 2 of 5 7. Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Traffic flow on major streets ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of public parking ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by car in Pasco .............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by public transportation in Pasco ........................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of travel by bicycle in Pasco ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ease of walking in Pasco ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned residential growth ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-planned commercial growth .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Well-designed neighborhoods ........................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community ............ 1 2 3 4 5 Public places where people want to spend time ........................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Variety of housing options ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality housing ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall quality of new development in Pasco ............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Overall appearance of Pasco ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Cleanliness of Pasco ................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Water resources (beaches, lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Air quality .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of paths and walking trails .......................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) ... 1 2 3 4 5 Recreational opportunities .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality food ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality health care ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of preventive health services ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality mental health care ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Community support for the arts ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 K-12 education .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Adult educational opportunities ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sense of civic/community pride ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Neighborliness of residents in Pasco ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in social events and activities .................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to attend special events and festivals ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to volunteer .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Opportunities to participate in community matters ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. No Yes Contacted the City of Pasco (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information ................................... 1 2 Contacted Pasco elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion ....................... 1 2 Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Commissioners, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) ............................................ 1 2 Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting ............................................................................................... 1 2 Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Pasco ................................................................................................. 1 2 Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate .................................................................................. 1 2 Voted in your most recent local election ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Used bus, rail, subway, or other public transportation instead of driving ............................................................... 1 2 Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone .............................................................................. 1 2 Walked or biked instead of driving ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Page 300 of 354 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2021 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Pasco 2021 Community Survey Page 3 of 5 9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know Public information services ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Economic development ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic enforcement ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Traffic signal timing ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Street repair ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Street cleaning ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Street lighting ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Snow removal ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 Sidewalk maintenance ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Bus or transit services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Land use, planning, and zoning ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Affordable high-speed internet access ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Garbage collection ............................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Drinking water ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Sewer services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) .................... 1 2 3 4 5 Power (electric and/or gas) utility ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Utility billing .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Police/Sheriff services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Crime prevention ................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Animal control ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Ambulance or emergency medical services ............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Fire services ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Fire prevention and education ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) ..... 1 2 3 4 5 Pasco open space ................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Recycling .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Yard waste pick-up .............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 City parks ................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation programs or classes .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Recreation centers or facilities ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Health services ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Public library services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall customer service by Pasco employees (police, receptionists, planners, etc.) ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 10. Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco ................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 The overall direction that Pasco is taking ................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Overall confidence in Pasco government .................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Generally acting in the best interest of the community ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Being honest ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Being open and transparent to the public ................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Informing residents about issues facing the community ................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Treating all residents fairly ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Treating residents with respect .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Page 301 of 354 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2021 National Research Center, Inc. Page 4 of 5 11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Excellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know The City of Pasco .................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 The Federal Government .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Very Somewhat Not at all Essential important important important Overall economic health of Pasco ........................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in Pasco .......................................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall design or layout of Pasco’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) .....................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Pasco (water, sewer, storm water, electric, gas) ....................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall feeling of safety in Pasco ..........................................................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of natural environment in Pasco ..........................................................1 2 3 4 Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ...............................................1 2 3 4 Overall health and wellness opportunities in Pasco ....................................................1 2 3 4 Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts........................................1 2 3 4 Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .............................1 2 3 4 13. Short-term rentals (overnight accommodations of less than 30 consecutive days, such as those provided by Airbnb, VRBO, FlipKey, etc.) are not currently permitted in Pasco. The City is considering creating an inspection program to manage short-term rentals, which would require hiring additional City staff to complete inspections and process licenses. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose adding City staff to manage a short-term rental program in our community.  Strongly support  Somewhat support  Somewhat oppose  Strongly oppose  Don’t know 14. Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources for the prevention and/or treatment for conditions such as substance abuse or mental illness remains limited. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose a one-tenth of a percent sales tax to fund additional mental health services in the city of Pasco.  Strongly support  Somewhat support  Somewhat oppose  Strongly oppose  Don’t know 15. In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate, license, and tax the production, processing, and sale of marijuana. Local jurisdictions have the option to prohibit or designate zones for state- licensed marijuana businesses. These businesses are currently prohibited in the city of Pasco. Council is now considering revisiting this prohibition. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose changing regulations to allow retail marijuana sales and related operations within Pasco city limits.  Strongly support  Somewhat support  Somewhat oppose  Strongly oppose  Don’t know Page 302 of 354 The National Community Survey™ • © 2001-2021 National Research Center, Inc. The City of Pasco 2021 Community Survey Page 5 of 5 Our last questions are about you and your household. Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared. D1. In general, how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don’t times a day a day a week few weeks or never know Access the internet from your home using a computer, laptop, or tablet computer ......................1 2 3 4 5 6 Access the internet from your cell phone .......................1 2 3 4 5 6 Visit social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Nextdoor, etc. .......................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Use or check email ....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Share your opinions online ...................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 Shop online ..................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 D2. Please rate your overall health.  Excellent  Very good  Good  Fair  Poor D3. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:  Very positive  Somewhat positive  Neutral  Somewhat negative  Very negative D4. How many years have you lived in Pasco?  Less than 2 years  2-5 years  6-10 years  11-20 years  More than 20 years D5. Which best describes the building you live in?  One family house detached from any other houses  Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apartment, or condominium)  Mobile home  Other D6. Do you rent or own your home?  Rent  Own D7. About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners’ association (HOA) fees)?  Less than $500  $2,000 to $2,499  $500 to $999  $2,500 to $2,999  $1,000 to $1,499  $3,000 to $3,499  $1,500 to $1,999  $3,500 or more D8. Do any children 17 or under live in your household?  No  Yes D9. Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older?  No  Yes D10. How much do you anticipate your household’s total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.)  Less than $25,000  $75,000 to $99,999  $25,000 to $49,999  $100,000 to $149,999  $50,000 to $74,999  $150,000 or more D11. Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?  No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino  Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino D12. What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.)  American Indian or Alaskan Native  Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander  Black or African American  White  Other D13. In which category is your age?  18-24 years  55-64 years  25-34 years  65-74 years  35-44 years  75 years or older  45-54 years D14. What is your gender?  Female  Male  Identify in another way Thank you! Please return the completed survey in the postage-paid envelope to: National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 549, Belle Mead, NJ 08502 Page 303 of 354 District 1District 2District 3District 4District 5District 6Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to live Your neighborhood as a place to live Pasco as a place to raise children Pasco as a place to work Pasco as a place to visit Pasco as a place to retire The overall quality of life Sense of community Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Remain in Pasco for the next five years Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day From property crime From violent crime 85%57%80%89%46%49% 67%72%96%91%6%31% 80%56%86%89%32%45% 88%48%69%76%43%73% 24%37%27%49%1%44% 45%41%64%62%42%42% 80%63%74%85%31%49% 58%43%38%48%28%43% 75%34%68%69%31%35% 44%40%35%70%31%66% 59%25%35%53%26%33% 55%48%87%69%43%33% 18%50%71%76%33%42% 46%43%61%52%48%36% 46%35%39%59%34%28% 29%41%37%63%31%48% 61%35%37%58%28%40% 35%24%22%40%48%32% 63%76%79%86%37%86% 67%81%89%76%29%86% 67%82%94%97%67%56% 47%37%50%48%60%29% 27%53%63%74%24%35% Comparison of Responses by Respondent Characteristics This dashboard allows the user to specify which demographics to include in the table using the dropdown menu below. Responses have been summarized to show only the proportion of respondents giving a positive answer; for example, the percent of respondents who rated the quality of life as excellent or good. In the "Statistical significance" tab, you will find a tool to help determine the threshold values for statistically significant differences between groups. Page 304 of 354 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: From property crime From violent crime From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Taking care of vulnerable residents Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Variety of business and service establishments Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Employment opportunities Shopping opportunities Cost of living Overall image or reputation Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Traffic flow on major streets Ease of public parking Ease of travel by car Ease of travel by public transportation Ease of travel by bicycle Ease of walking Well-planned residential growth Well-planned commercial growth Well-designed neighborhoods Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Public places where people want to spend time Variety of housing options Availability of affordable quality housing Overall quality of new development Overall appearance Cleanliness Water resources Air quality 69%68%76%78%41%11% 97%89%81%96%63%55% 60%55%46%79%48%45% 65%46%33%89%35%42% 64%45%38%80%34%26% 7%33%46%72%54%24% 66%39%57%75%45%42% 68%43%37%63%44%25% 12%19%19%22%22%6% 62%49%44%60%44%65% 50%28%29%37%23%44% 36%41%42%51%40%9% 25%24%36%46%30%29% 21%12%27%34%24%21% 41%40%53%73%24%21% 56%46%70%78%59%43% 52%62%51%55%35%72% 21%32%24%62%25%9% 30%44%41%58%27%39% 13%19%35%47%35%28% 49%26%35%43%47%44% 44%25%53%56%26%30% 49%37%38%38%43%49% 21%24%24%28%36%45% 23%26%29%54%40%5% 7%17%10%47%35%22% 35%41%58%54%36%31% 47%37%57%52%30%44% 48%47%68%69%25%22% 82%37%57%66%23%32% Page 305 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Water resources Air quality Availability of paths and walking trails Fitness opportunities Recreational opportunities Availability of affordable quality food Availability of affordable quality health care Availability of preventive health services Availability of affordable quality mental health care Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Community support for the arts Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool K-12 education Adult educational opportunities Sense of civic/community pride Neighborliness of residents Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Opportunities to volunteer Opportunities to participate in community matters Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information Contacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinion Attended a local public meeting Watched a local public meeting Volunteered your time to some group/activity Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Voted in your most recent local election Used public transportation instead of driving Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone Walked or biked instead of driving Public information services 68%63%74%71%58%37% 53%48%50%69%55%18% 11%46%63%53%26%46% 34%42%43%51%23%39% 56%55%66%73%40%24% 37%35%44%66%44%34% 75%37%37%65%42%21% 8%8%6%61%23%18% 44%30%8%20%19%16% 44%35%7%43%23%40% 22%23%33%36%9%25% 48%34%44%57%27%35% 34%49%36%57%4%33% 44%42%33%39%20%29% 38%31%42%48%41%24% 45%28%19%44%30%3% 46%43%21%51%44%39% 44%49%23%51%40%17% 38%37%18%48%54%23% 53%50%24%64%34%21% 44%47%59%47%45%59% 7%17%12%17%18%2% 8%24%7%21%21%0% 41%64%26%34%24%8% 41%33%27%28%21%22% 18%23%5%21%37%9% 45%83%71%81%55%67% 12%4%11%3%43%20% 56%48%57%42%54%76% 53%61%54%37%60%57% Page 306 of 354 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.Walked or biked instead of driving Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Public information services Economic development Traffic enforcement Traffic signal timing Street repair Street cleaning Street lighting Snow removal Sidewalk maintenance Bus or transit services Land use, planning and zoning Code enforcement Affordable high-speed internet access Garbage collection Drinking water Sewer services Storm water management Power (electric and/or gas) utility Utility billing Police/Sheriff services Crime prevention Animal control Ambulance or emergency medical services Fire services Fire prevention and education Emergency preparedness Preservation of natural areas Pasco open space Recycling Yard waste pick-up City parks 60%54%37%70%36%25% 60%57%43%69%9%37% 68%35%56%65%39%29% 59%45%49%69%42%30% 46%34%52%62%35%29% 58%49%58%72%23%16% 50%52%58%63%35%20% 33%46%32%45%34%8% 38%38%48%62%24%32% 56%61%49%59%40%59% 36%21%24%60%34%30% 61%19%26%47%39%33% 61%53%19%22%58%13% 78%80%92%78%67%76% 97%69%70%65%60%48% 78%73%93%77%66%51% 71%61%88%77%54%43% 75%78%93%81%75%43% 52%57%81%77%58%23% 37%55%76%70%49%55% 31%49%45%52%41%40% 19%29%75%43%24%23% 72%59%82%85%58%45% 66%70%92%85%60%58% 46%44%71%77%49%27% 42%39%51%69%28%44% 46%37%51%61%34%11% 57%24%32%60%44%28% 20%19%6%23%6%39% 58%58%50%51%45%63% Page 307 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Yard waste pick-up City parks Recreation programs or classes Recreation centers or facilities Health services Public library services Overall customer service by Pasco employees Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco The overall direction that Pasco is taking The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Overall confidence in Pasco government Generally acting in the best interest of the community Being honest Being open and transparent to the public Informing residents about issues facing the community Treating all residents fairly Treating residents with respect Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Pasco The Federal Government Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Overall quality of the transportation system Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Overall feeling of safety Overall quality of natural environment Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Overall health and wellness opportunities Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Residents' connection and engagement with their community Short-term rentals (overnight accommodations of less than 30 consecutive days, such as those provided by Airbnb, VRBO, Flip.. Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources for the pre.. In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate, license, and tax the production, processing, and sale o.. 55%43%59%62%36%41% 38%33%21%56%35%16% 39%43%30%53%29%21% 48%55%52%65%35%41% 60%60%84%86%55%65% 40%60%51%80%36%51% 33%32%13%60%25%10% 48%45%56%62%47%55% 42%45%18%48%38%28% 49%35%34%58%47%23% 45%46%38%69%29%33% 53%47%34%60%48%21% 54%37%15%62%30%23% 33%36%27%61%36%36% 52%37%23%65%30%54% 64%49%35%65%27%40% 59%56%69%68%47%36% 44%23%21%40%44%32% 99%78%93%89%83%88% 92%65%78%64%97%79% 96%86%91%86%82%98% 97%86%98%76%69%81% 98%87%81%91%100%100% 75%75%57%61%93%86% 93%81%74%64%93%93% 99%62%71%61%100%93% 98%52%68%64%98%85% 57%61%71%67%100%68% 73%54%52%56%94%43% 57%72%89%80%80%81% Page 308 of 354 Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources for the pre.. In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate, license, and tax the production, processing, and sale o.. In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Access the internet from your cell phone Visit social media sites Use or check email Share your opinions online Shop online Please rate your overall health. What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact wil.. 73%60%49%41%72%19% 98%98%98%94%83%50% 99%97%100%97%99%79% 86%76%80%94%82%68% 100%99%100%92%100%71% 44%39%27%34%24%38% 52%69%53%55%40%0% 21%54%79%79%72%27% 30%21%27%32%40%11% Page 309 of 354 In which district of Pasco do you live? (Refer to map above.) Council District 1 Council District 2 Council District 3 Council District 4 Council District 5 Council District 6 None of these/I don't live in Pasco Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Your neighborhood as a place to live Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to raise children Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to work Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to visit Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco as a place to retire Excellent Good 1% 11% 18% 21% 24% 14% 11% 4% 32% 39% 25% 6% 17% 42% 35% 8% 22% 44% 26% 5% 31% 47% 17% 21% 30% 36% 12% 23% Open participation survey results This dashboard contains a complete set of responses to each question on the open participation survey. By default, "don't know" responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter to the right. When a table for a question that only permitted a single response does not total to exactly 100%, it is due to the common practice of percentages being rounded to the nearest whole number. Page 310 of 354 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Pasco. Pasco as a place to retire Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall quality of life Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall economic health Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the transportation system Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall feeling of safety Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good 14% 31% 31% 6% 23% 51% 21% 16% 31% 41% 11% 7% 30% 52% 11% 21% 33% 37% 9% 23% 32% 41% 4% 6% 20% 59% 16% 16% 36% 35% 13% 11% Page 311 of 354 Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Pasco as a whole. Overall quality of natural environment Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall health and wellness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Residents' connection and engagement with their community Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. Recommend living in Pasco to someone who asks Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Remain in Pasco for the next five years Very likely Somewhat likely Somewhat unlikely Very unlikely Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Very safe 15% 33% 41% 21% 29% 38% 11% 17% 36% 38% 9% 23% 42% 27% 9% 27% 47% 19% 6% 7% 9% 49% 34% 8% 5% 28% 59% 5% 0% 7% 27% 61% Page 312 of 354 Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: In your neighborhood during the day Very unsafe In Pasco's downtown/commercial area during the day Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From property crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From violent crime Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe From fire, flood, or other natural disaster Very safe Somewhat safe Neither safe nor unsafe Somewhat unsafe Very unsafe Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Making all residents feel welcome Excellent Good Fair Poor Attracting people from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 8% 21% 13% 36% 22% 7% 17% 19% 42% 15% 4% 11% 14% 41% 30% 1% 1% 9% 34% 55% 10% 35% 44% 10% 10% 29% 43% 18% 14% 34% 31% 21% Page 313 of 354 Please rate the job you feel the Pasco community does at each of the following. Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds Poor Taking care of vulnerable residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Overall quality of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of business and service establishments Excellent Good Fair Poor Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area Excellent Good Fair Poor Employment opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Shopping opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Cost of living Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall image or reputation Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 26% 41% 25% 8% 12% 26% 53% 9% 20% 33% 41% 6% 35% 37% 24% 4% 10% 39% 40% 11% 38% 34% 25% 4% 15% 52% 23% 10% 23% 34% 34% 8% Page 314 of 354 Please rate each of the following in the Pasco community.Overall image or reputation Poor Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Traffic flow on major streets Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of public parking Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by car Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by public transportation Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of travel by bicycle Excellent Good Fair Poor Ease of walking Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned residential growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Well-planned commercial growth Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 30% 36% 29% 5% 13% 34% 44% 9% 5% 26% 49% 19% 21% 29% 40% 10% 23% 35% 27% 15% 19% 34% 32% 16% 28% 37% 31% 3% 36% 25% 32% 7% Page 315 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Well-planned commercial growth Poor Well-designed neighborhoods Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Public places where people want to spend time Excellent Good Fair Poor Variety of housing options Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality housing Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall quality of new development Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall appearance Excellent Good Fair Poor Cleanliness Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 18% 35% 43% 4% 28% 33% 31% 8% 34% 37% 23% 6% 24% 41% 28% 8% 47% 35% 12% 6% 12% 41% 35% 12% 15% 38% 39% 7% 18% 35% 34% 13% Page 316 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Cleanliness Poor Water resources Excellent Good Fair Poor Air quality Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of paths and walking trails Excellent Good Fair Poor Fitness opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality food Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of preventive health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 20% 30% 36% 14% 3% 26% 47% 24% 14% 27% 43% 15% 18% 33% 42% 8% 24% 32% 36% 8% 15% 25% 45% 16% 21% 38% 31% 10% 17% 45% 30% 8% Page 317 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Availability of preventive health services Poor Availability of affordable quality mental health care Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Community support for the arts Excellent Good Fair Poor Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool Excellent Good Fair Poor K-12 education Excellent Good Fair Poor Adult educational opportunities Excellent Good Fair Poor Sense of civic/community pride Excellent Good Fair Poor Neighborliness of residents Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 39% 41% 17% 3% 44% 31% 19% 5% 40% 34% 20% 5% 47% 36% 10% 7% 8% 38% 42% 11% 14% 36% 44% 6% 23% 37% 26% 13% 9% 46% 37% 8% Page 318 of 354 Please also rate each of the following in the Pasco community. Neighborliness of residents Poor Opportunities to participate in social events and activities Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to attend special events and festivals Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to volunteer Excellent Good Fair Poor Opportunities to participate in community matters Excellent Good Fair Poor Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds Excellent Good Fair Poor Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Contacted the City of Pasco for help or information No Yes Contacted Pasco elected officials to express your opinion No Yes Attended a local public meeting No Yes Watched a local public meeting No Yes Volunteered your time to some group/activity No Yes Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate No Yes No 35% 33% 26% 7% 28% 37% 24% 12% 15% 37% 37% 11% 24% 37% 29% 11% 12% 31% 36% 21% 56% 44% 26% 74% 28% 72% 60% 40% 38% 62% 30% 70% Page 319 of 354 Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate Yes Voted in your most recent local election No Yes Used public transportation instead of driving No Yes Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone No Yes Walked or biked instead of driving No Yes Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Public information services Excellent Good Fair Poor Economic development Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Traffic signal timing Excellent Good Fair Poor Street repair Excellent Good Fair Poor Street cleaning Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 74% 26% 14% 86% 50% 50% 48% 52% 17% 37% 34% 12% 14% 34% 40% 11% 18% 33% 40% 9% 20% 33% 38% 8% 20% 37% 37% 5% 15% 30% 47% 9% Page 320 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Street cleaning Poor Street lighting Excellent Good Fair Poor Snow removal Excellent Good Fair Poor Sidewalk maintenance Excellent Good Fair Poor Bus or transit services Excellent Good Fair Poor Land use, planning and zoning Excellent Good Fair Poor Code enforcement Excellent Good Fair Poor Affordable high-speed internet access Excellent Good Fair Poor Garbage collection Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 15% 34% 44% 8% 23% 32% 32% 13% 13% 35% 44% 8% 6% 38% 48% 8% 27% 38% 27% 8% 28% 34% 29% 9% 24% 33% 32% 11% 4% 21% 39% 36% Page 321 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Garbage collection Poor Drinking water Excellent Good Fair Poor Sewer services Excellent Good Fair Poor Storm water management Excellent Good Fair Poor Power (electric and/or gas) utility Excellent Good Fair Poor Utility billing Excellent Good Fair Poor Police/Sheriff services Excellent Good Fair Poor Crime prevention Excellent Good Fair Poor Animal control Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 8% 24% 33% 34% 4% 17% 48% 31% 6% 23% 40% 31% 2% 23% 42% 34% 9% 24% 40% 27% 12% 18% 37% 33% 13% 28% 39% 20% 28% 22% 42% 8% Page 322 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Animal control Poor Ambulance or emergency medical services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire services Excellent Good Fair Poor Fire prevention and education Excellent Good Fair Poor Emergency preparedness Excellent Good Fair Poor Preservation of natural areas Excellent Good Fair Poor Pasco open space Excellent Good Fair Poor Recycling Excellent Good Fair Poor Yard waste pick-up Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 2% 12% 50% 36% 0% 12% 41% 47% 11% 17% 41% 32% 26% 19% 38% 18% 26% 27% 28% 19% 24% 35% 30% 11% 63% 19% 14% 3% 28% 35% 22% 15% Page 323 of 354 Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Pasco. Yard waste pick-up Poor City parks Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation programs or classes Excellent Good Fair Poor Recreation centers or facilities Excellent Good Fair Poor Health services Excellent Good Fair Poor Public library services Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall customer service by Pasco employees Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The value of services for the taxes paid to Pasco Excellent Good Fair Poor The overall direction that Pasco is taking Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 28% 31% 27% 14% 30% 34% 28% 8% 33% 31% 30% 6% 14% 47% 32% 7% 12% 19% 42% 27% 8% 26% 44% 22% 24% 33% 34% 9% 21% 28% 37% 14% Page 324 of 354 Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance. The overall direction that Pasco is taking Poor The job Pasco government does at welcoming resident involvement Excellent Good Fair Poor Overall confidence in Pasco government Excellent Good Fair Poor Generally acting in the best interest of the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Being honest Excellent Good Fair Poor Being open and transparent to the public Excellent Good Fair Poor Informing residents about issues facing the community Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating all residents fairly Excellent Good Fair Poor Treating residents with respect Excellent Good Fair Poor Excellent 20% 37% 30% 13% 21% 38% 28% 13% 22% 27% 37% 14% 19% 30% 34% 17% 20% 36% 29% 16% 33% 26% 30% 11% 24% 29% 34% 13% 15% 27% 44% 14% Page 325 of 354 Please rate the following categories of Pasco government performance.Treating residents with respect Poor Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? The City of Pasco Excellent Good Fair Poor The Federal Government Excellent Good Fair Poor Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall economic health Essential Very important Somewhat important Overall quality of the transportation system Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall design or layout of residential and commercial areas Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of the utility infrastructure Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall feeling of safety Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of natural environment Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important 11% 29% 43% 18% 26% 42% 30% 2% 7% 42% 51% 5% 16% 41% 38% 3% 7% 43% 47% 0% 13% 40% 47% 0% 2% 38% 60% 2% 22% 44% 32% 40% Page 326 of 354 Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Pasco community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years. Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall health and wellness opportunities Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Residents' connection and engagement with their community Essential Very important Somewhat important Not at all important Short-term rentals (overnight accommodations of less than 30 consecutive days, such as those provided by Airbnb, VRBO, FlipKey, etc.) are not currently permitted in Pasco. The City is considering creating an inspection program to manage short-term rentals, which would require hiring additional City staff to complete inspection.. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources for the prevention and/or treatment for conditions such as substance abuse or mental illness remains limited. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose a one-tenth of a percent sales tax to fund additional mental he.. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate, license, and tax the production, processing, and sale of marijuana. Local jurisdictions have the option to prohibit or designate zones for state-licensed marijuana businesses. These businesses are currently prohibited in the city of Pasco. Council is now cons.. Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose In general, how many times do you:Access the internet from your home Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Several times a day 0% 16% 45% 2% 13% 42% 43% 2% 19% 33% 46% 2% 22% 35% 41% 14% 8% 32% 46% 9% 7% 24% 60% 22% 10% 10% 58% 1% 3% 5% 5% 85% Page 327 of 354 In general, how many times do you: Access the internet from your home Less often or never Access the internet from your cell phone Several times a day Once a day Every few weeks Less often or never Visit social media sites Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Use or check email Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Share your opinions online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Shop online Several times a day Once a day A few times a week Every few weeks Less often or never Please rate your overall health.Excellent Very good Good Fair Poor What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be: Very positive Somewhat positive Neutral Somewhat negative Very negative Less than 2 years 0% 0% 2% 97% 1% 0% 1% 19% 79% 4% 16% 80% 47% 9% 23% 6% 15% 6% 22% 41% 8% 23% 1% 3% 29% 43% 25% 6% 20% 33% 28% 13% Page 328 of 354 What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:Very negative How many years have you lived in Pasco?Less than 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years More than 20 years Which best describes the building you live in?One family house detached from any other houses Building with two or more homes (duplex, townhome, apa.. Mobile home Other Do you rent or own your home?Rent Own About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance, and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? About how much is your monthly housing cost for the place you live (including rent, mortgage payment, property tax, property insurance and homeowners' association (HOA) fees)? Less than $500 $500 to $999 $1,000 to $1,499 $1,500 to $1,999 $2,000 to $2,499 $2,500 to $2,999 $3,000 to $3,499 $3,500 or more Do any children 17 or under live in your household?No Yes Are you or any other members of your household aged 65 or older? No Yes How much do you anticipate your household's total income before taxes will be for the current year? (Please include in your total income money from all sources for all persons living in your household.) Less than $25,000 $25,000 to $49,999 $50,000 to $74,999 $75,000 to $99,999 $100,000 to $149,999 $150,000 or more Are you Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino?Are you Spanish, Hispanic or Latino?No, not Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino Yes, I consider myself to be Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander 49% 17% 12% 12% 9% 5% 1% 28% 67% 69% 31% 0% 2% 4% 10% 24% 35% 17% 8% 45% 55% 25% 75% 15% 19% 19% 16% 27% 4% 49% 51% 1% Page 329 of 354 What is your race? (Mark one or more races to indicate what race you consider yourself to be.) American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian, Asian Indian, or Pacific Islander Black or African American White Other In which category is your age?18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years 65-74 years 75 years or older What is your gender?Female Male Identify in another way How did you hear about this survey? (Select all that apply.) The City's website The City's social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,.. Received an email from the City In a City newsletter or utility bill Received a postcard or letter from the City Nextdoor In my Facebook feed Saw it on a video of a public meeting or at a meeting I atten.. Saw it on the City's cable channel Saw it in a newspaper article or ad (hard copy or online Heard about it from a family member, friend or neighborhood Heard about it from a business or social organization in my co.. Polco social media post On my Polco feed Other 26% 75% 0% 2% 4% 9% 12% 10% 26% 24% 14% 0% 52% 48% 7% 0% 2% 2% 8% 2% 0% 0% 28% 0% 1% 1% 8% 46% 9% Page 330 of 354 2021 Community SurveyMarch 21, 2022Page 331 of 354 Community Surveying•National Community Survey •Developed to provide communities an accurate, affordable and easy way to assess and interpret resident opinion & offer insight into residents’ perspectives about the community as a whole•Standardization of common questions and survey methods assure valid results•Surveying Pasco•Conducted survey in odd years since 2005, providing trends over time•Survey information has subsequently been part of the information considered by Council in developing goals for the ensuing biennium•Custom policy questions•Open participation (in addition to statistically valid)•Spanish participation optionPage 332 of 354 Facets of a Community•Economy•Mobility•Community Design•Utilities•Safety•Natural Environment•Parks and Recreation•Health and Wellness•Education, Arts, and Culture•Inclusivity and EngagementPage 333 of 354 2021 Survey TimelinePolicy Questions• Council discussed and approved (3) questions to include in Fall 2021.-Short-Term Rental Program-Mental Health Sales Tax-Regulation Changes to Allow Retail Marijuana Random (Statistically Valid) Survey• 3,700 households randomly selected• 1,700 traditional • 2,000 online invitation • Data collected November 17- January 12Open Participation Survey• December 22-January 12ResultsDraft results provided in February 2022Page 334 of 354 Survey Responses Year HouseholdsCompeted by MailCompleted OnlineCompleted Online -SpanishTotal ResponsesResponseRateError Factor2021 3700 137 195 14 346 10% +/- 5%2019 1700 190 16 1 207 12% +/- 7%2017 1500 196 16 3 215 15% +/- 7% Page 335 of 354 Results•Changes greater than 9% are considered statistically significant•Overall ratings remain stable (page 7 of “The NRC Report”)•Parks and recreation opportunities (COVID restrictions)•Benchmark data is largely from prior to pandemicPage 336 of 354 Highlights2019 –Statistically Valid2021 –Statistically Valid2021 – Open ParticipationOverall quality of life61% 69% 72%Recommend Pasco as place to live78% 76% 83%Remain in Pasco next 5 years81% 79% 87%Pasco as a place to visit33% 35% 48%Pasco as a place to work56% 67% 64% Page 337 of 354 Highlights2019 –Statistically Valid2021 –Statistically Valid2021 – Open ParticipationOverall customer service by City employees59% 57% 66%Quality of service provided by the City62% 61% 61%Overall direction City is taking56% 56% 51%Utility billing54% 64% 67%Police services73% 61% 70%Fire services85% 77% 88% Page 338 of 354 Highlights2019 – Statistically Valid 2021 – Statistically Valid 2021 – Open ParticipationValue of services for taxes paid50% 33% 43%Variety of business and service establishments54% 45% 47%Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area29% 19% 28%Community valuing/respecting residents of diverse backgrounds67% 49% 52%Opportunities to participate in social events/activities42% 30% 33% Page 339 of 354 Mobility2019 –Statistically Valid2021 –Statistically Valid2021 – Open ParticipationOverall quality of transportation system57% 51% 46%Traffic flow on major streets41% 29% 34%Ease of travel by bicycle44% 33% 42%•Completion of City’s first Transportation System Master PlanPage 340 of 354 Community Design•Areas of focus based on responses•Well-planned residential growth•Public places where people can spend time•Variety of housing options•Availability of affordable quality housing•Staff efforts•HB 1406 (ADUs, duplex/triplex, lot size averaging)•Housing Action & Implementation Plan •Coordinating w/Home Builders Association of Tri-Cities•Participation in national Housing Solutions Workshop & Peer Cities Network with NYU Furman Center & Lincoln Institute of Land PolicyPage 341 of 354 Safety2019 – Statistically Valid 2021 – Statistically Valid 2021 – Open ParticipationSafety in neighborhood during the day90% 82% 88%Safety DT/commercial area during day66% 48% 58%Quality of crime prevention services61% 46% 59%Ambulance & EMS82% 69% 86%Fire prevention & education69% 58% 73%•Remains an area of continued importance•Decreased after steady levels last several cycles; recent actions/activities:•2021 State Legislative actions related to police response•2021 Washington State Supreme Court Blake decision (possession of controlled substances)•National dialogue on police reform•COVID-19 Page 342 of 354 Short-Term RentalsPolicy Question No. 1Short-term rentals (overnight accommodations of less than 30 consecutive days, such as those provided by Airbnb, VRBO, FlipKey, etc.) are not currently permitted in Pasco. The City is considering creating an inspection program to manage short-term rentals, which would require hiring additional City staff to complete inspections and process licenses. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose adding City staff to manage a short-term rental program in our community.Statistically Valid Open ParticipationStrongly support / somewhat support50% 74%Strongly oppose / somewhat oppose35% 21%Don’t know15% 5% Page 343 of 354 Mental Health Sales TaxPolicy Question No. 2Mental health includes a broad spectrum of social, psychological, emotional, and behavioral traits. Funding resources for the prevention and/or treatment for conditions such as substance abuse or mental illness remains limited. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose a one-tenth of a percent sales tax to fund additional mental health services in the city of Pasco.Statistically Valid* Open ParticipationStrongly support / somewhat support73% 81%Strongly oppose / somewhat oppose20% 16%Don’t know8% 3%*over 100% method of roundingPage 344 of 354 Regulation Changes to Allow Retail MarijuanaPolicy Question No. 3In 2012, Washington voters approved a ballot initiative to regulate,license, and tax the production, processing, and sale of marijuana. Local jurisdictions have the option to prohibit or designate zones for state-licensed marijuana businesses. These businesses are currently prohibited in the city of Pasco. Council is now considering revisiting this prohibition. Please indicate how much you would support or oppose changing regulations to allow retail marijuana sales and related operations within Pasco city limits.Statistically Valid* Open ParticipationStrongly support / somewhat support45% 68%Strongly oppose / somewhat oppose46% 31%Don’t know10% 1%*over 100% method of roundingPage 345 of 354 Reports Available•Full PDF Report available in Council Agenda Packet•Online dashboard through Tableau•Data can be viewed by age, sex, race & Hispanic origin, housing tenure, housing type, length of residency, presence of children/older adults, and area (Council District) on “Comparisons” tab by using “Select Column”•Council District Report: As a caution, given the relatively small numbers of respondents in some districts, the numbers should be weighed accordingly.Page 346 of 354 •Questions?Page 347 of 354 Pasco City Council MeetingMarch 21, 2022Page 348 of 354 QUALITY OF LIFE Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re- investment in community infrastructure by: • Using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and other public and private capital to revitalize older neighborhoods and safe routes to essential services. • Continuing efforts toward designing, siting, programming needs, and site selection for a community center and pursuing acquisition of land for future community park. • Developing Phase I of the A Street Sporting Complex and continue efforts to provide additional soccer and sports fields. • Coordinating with the Pasco Public Facilities District to develop a public education campaign, financial analysis and prepare a ballot measure concerning the development of a regional aquatic facility for consideration by the people. • Completing construction of a new animal control facility. • Ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and effectiveness of public resources in the delivery of municipal services, programs, and long-term maintenance and viability of public facilities. • Collaborating with the Inclusion, Diversity and Equity Commission and community leaders to enhance engagement efforts and organizational cultural competency. • Updating design standards for the development of new neighborhoods and re-development to promote greater neighborhood cohesion through design elements, e.g.: walkability, aesthetics, sustainability, and community gathering spaces. • Updating Parks and Facilities Comprehensive Plan to include: public facilities inventory, needs assessment, level of service, and centers evaluation. • Teaming with local and regional partners to develop a Housing Action Plan with a focus on strategies that emphasize affordable housing. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY Enhance the long-term financial viability, value, and service levels of services and programs, including: • Regular evaluation of services and programs to confirm importance to community, adequacy, and cost-benefit. • Continuation of cost of service and recovery targets in evaluating City services. • Ongoing evaluation of costs, processes and performance associated with delivery of City services including customer feedback and satisfaction, staffing, facilities, and partnership opportunities. • Instilling and promoting an organizational culture of customer service across all business lines. • Updating policies relating to urbanization of the unincorporated islands to assure consistency with long-range planning, community safety, and fiscal sustainability. City Council Goals 2020-2021 Page 349 of 354 COMMUNITY SAFETY Preserve past improvements and promote future gains by: • Developing a Comprehensive Police Strategic Master Plan through a transparent process to evaluate future service levels of the department to assure sustainability, public safety, and crime control over the next 5-10 years. • Collaborating with regional and community partners to evaluate and implement strategies to reduce the incidence of homelessness. • Leveraging and expanding partnerships to maintain and enhance behavioral health services to community members in crisis being assisted by police and fire. • Continuing efforts to improve police and community relations. • Working to achieve and maintain target fire response times through operational improvements and long-range strategic planning of facilities and staffing. • Focusing on the long-term goal of sustaining a Washington State Rating Bureau Class 3 community rating. • Leveraging infrastructure database of sidewalks, streetlights and pavement conditions along with evaluating policies and methods to address needs and inequities. COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Promote a highly-functional multi-modal transportation network through: • Commencement and completion of construction of the Lewis Street Overpass project. • Continued emphasis on improvements in Road 68/I-182/Burden Blvd. corridor to improve operation and safety. • Data-driven pro-active neighborhood traffic calming efforts. • Continued collaboration with Ben Franklin Transit to enhance mobility and access. • Completion of a Transportation System Master Plan and utilization of its recommendations to develop policies, regulations, programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic investment, mobility, multi-modal systems, accessibility, efficiency and safety. ECONOMIC VITALITY Promote and encourage economic vitality by supporting: • Downtown revitalization efforts of Downtown Pasco Development Authority (DPDA), post-COVID restart, and City initiatives such as Downtown Master Plan process and sign code modifications. • The construction of Peanuts Park and Farmers Market and continued efforts to pursue streetscape and gateway upgrades. • The completion of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update and Broadmoor Master Plan efforts, adoption of Urban Growth Area expansion alternative, implementation of adopted long-range planning efforts with appropriate analysis and adoption of planning actions including: zoning code changes, phased sign code update, and development regulations and standards. • Increased efforts to promote the community as a desirable place for commercial and industrial development by promoting small business outreach and assistance, predictability in project review, and excellent customer service. • Partnerships and encouragement of Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to facilitate development of the remaining state-owned properties at Road 68/I-182. Page 350 of 354 • Continued coordination with the Port of Pasco to complete and implement a waterfront-zoning plan and provide for public infrastructure. • Active partnerships in the planning and development of strategies to promote tourism and deployment of assets to spur economic activity. • In concert with community partners, development of a comprehensive economic development plan. COMMUNITY IDENTITY Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion and image through: • Continued efforts of community surveying through traditional methods and the application of new technologies. • Providing opportunities for community engagement through boards, commissions, volunteer opportunities, social media, forums, and other outlets. • Enhanced inter-agency and constituent coordination developed during the pandemic. • Continued efforts of the community identity/image enhancement campaign to include promotion of community and organizational successes. • Enhanced participation and support of cultural events occurring within the community. • Support of the Arts and Culture Commission in promoting unity and the celebration of diversity through art and culture programs. For more information, visit www.pasco-wa.gov/councilgoals Page 351 of 354 CALIDAD DE VIDA Promover una vida de buena calidad a través de programas de calidad, servicios e inversiones y reinversiones adecuadas en la infraestructura de la comunidad al: • Utilizar una Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (Concesión de Ayuda Federal para el Desarrollo Comunitario) y otro capital público y privado para renovar las vecindades antiguas y las rutas seguras a los servicios esenciales. • Continuar los esfuerzos hacia el diseño, las obras de construcción, las necesidades programáticas, y la elección de dichas obras de construcción, para un centro comunitario y comprar el terreno para un futuro parque comunitario. • Desarrollar la 1era Fase del Sporting Complex (Complejo Deportivo) de la Calle A y continuar los esfuerzos de proporcionar más campos de fútbol y de otros deportes. • Coordinar con el Pasco Public Facilities District (Distrito de las Instalaciones Públicas de Pasco) para desarrollar una campaña de educación pública, un análisis financiero, y preparar una propuesta sobre el desarrollo de una instalación acuática regional para que sea considerada por el público. • Terminar la construcción de una nueva instalación para el control de animales. • Continuar los esfuerzos para mejorar la eficiencia y la eficacia de los recursos públicos en la entrega de servicios municipales, programas, y el mantenimiento y la viabilidad a largo plazo de instalaciones públicas. • Colaborar con la Inclusion, Diversity and Equity Commission (Comisión de Inclusión, Diversidad, y Equidad) y con los líderes comunitarios para mejorar los esfuerzos de participación y la capacidad cultural organizacional. • Actualizar los estándares de diseño para el desarrollo de nuevas vecindades y el redesarrollo para promover más cohesión de las vecindades a través de elementos de diseño, p. ej.: viabilidad peatonal, evaluación de las necesidades, sustentabilidad, y lugares donde se puedan reunir los miembros de la comunidad. • Actualizar el Parks and Facilities Comprehensive Plan (Plan Comprehensivo de los Parques y las Instalaciones) para que incluya: un inventario de instalaciones públicas, una evaluación de las necesidades, el nivel de servicio, y la evaluación del centro. • Trabajar en equipo con colaboradores regionales para desarrollar un Housing Action Plan (Plan de Acción para Viviendas) con un enfoque en las estrategias que enfatizan viviendas económicas. SUSTENTABILIDAD FINANCIERA Mejorar la sustentabilidad financiera a largo plazo, el valor, y los niveles de servicios y programas, incluyendo: • La evaluación regular de los servicios y de los programas para confirmar la importancia de la comunidad, la capitalización adecuada, y el costo-beneficio. Metas del Concilio de la Ciudad del 2020-2021 Page 352 of 354 • La continuación del costo por el servicio y de las metas de recuperación al evaluar los servicios de la Ciudad. • La evaluación continua de los costos, los procesos y el desempeño relacionado con la entrega de los servicios de la Ciudad incluyendo la retroalimentación y la satisfacción del cliente, el personal, las instalaciones, y las oportunidades colaborativas. • Inculcar y promover una cultura organizacional de servicio al cliente a lo largo de todas las líneas de negocio. • Actualizar las políticas relacionadas con la urbanización de las islas no incorporadas para asegurar consistencia con la planificación a largo plazo, la seguridad comunitaria, y la sustentabilidad fiscal. SEGURIDAD COMUNITARIA Preservar las mejorías anteriores y promover las ganancias futuras al: • Desarrollar un Comprehensive Police Strategic Master Plan (Plan Maestro Estratégico Comprehensivo Policial) a través de un proceso transparente para evaluar los niveles futuros de servicio del departamento para asegurar sustentabilidad, seguridad pública, y control de crímenes durante los siguientes 5-10 años. • Trabajar con colaboradores regionales y comunitarios para evaluar e implementar estrategias para reducir los casos de personas sin techo. • Hacer uso y ampliar las colaboraciones para mantener y mejorar los servicios de salud conductual a los miembros de la comunidad que se encuentran en medio de una crisis, ayudados por la policía y por los bomberos. • Continuar los esfuerzos para mejorar la relación con la policía y con la comunidad. • Trabajar para lograr y mantener el tiempo de reacción de los bomberos a través de mejorías operacionales y la planificación estratégica de instalaciones y personal a largo plazo. • Enfocarse en la meta a largo plazo de mantener una clasificación de la comunidad Clase 3 del Washington State Rating Bureau (Departamento de Clasificación del Estado de Washington). • Utilizar la base de datos de la infraestructura de las banquetas, los faroles, y las condiciones del pavimento, como también evaluar las políticas y los métodos para tratar las necesidades y las injusticias. RED DE TRANSPORTE COMUNITARIO Promover una red de transporte extremadamente funcional y multimodal a través de: • El comienzo y el término de la construcción del proyecto Lewis Street Overpass. • El énfasis continuo en las mejorías de la ruta Road 68/I-182/Burden Blvd. para mejorar la operación y la seguridad. • Los esfuerzos proactivos basados en datos para calmar el tráfico en las vecindades. • La colaboración continua con Ben Franklin Transit para mejorar la movilidad y el acceso. • El término del Transportation System Master Plan (Plan Maestro del Sistema de Transporte) y la utilización de sus recomendaciones para desarrollar políticas, reglas, programas, y proyectos que proporcionan más conectividad, inversiones estratégicas, movilidad, sistemas multimodales, accesibilidad, eficiencia, y seguridad. Page 353 of 354 VITALIDAD ECONOMICA Promover y motivar la vitalidad económica al apoyar: • Los esfuerzos de renovación de la Downtown Pasco Development Authority (DPDA) (Autoridad de Desarrollo del Centro de Pasco), el reinicio después de COVID, y las iniciativas de la Ciudad como el proceso del Downtown Master Plan (Plan Maestro del Centro) y las modificaciones de los códigos de anuncios. • La construcción del Peanuts Park and Farmers Market (Parque Peanuts y el Mercado) y los esfuerzos continuos para discutir paisajes urbanos y actualizaciones de entradas. • El término de los esfuerzos de la Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update (Actualización Comprehensiva del Uso de Terrenos) y los esfuerzos del Broadmoor Master Plan (Plan Maestro de Broadmoor), la adopción de la alternativa de la expansión de Urban Growth Area (Área del Crecimiento Urbano), la implementación de los esfuerzos de planificación a largo plazo con los análisis adecuados y la adopción de acciones de planificación incluyendo: los cambios a los códigos de zonas, la actualización de los códigos de los anuncios de las fases, y el desarrollo de las reglas y los estándares. • Más esfuerzos para promover a la comunidad como un lugar atractivo para el desarrollo comercial e industrial al fomentar el alcance y la ayuda a los negocios pequeños, la predictibilidad en la revisión de proyectos, y un excelente servicio al cliente. • Las colaboraciones y la motivación del Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (Departamento de Recursos Naturales) para facilitar el desarrollo de las propiedades restantes del estado en Road 68/I- 182. • La coordinación continua con el Port of Pasco (Puerto de Pasco) para terminar e implementar un plan de zonas costeras y proporcionar una infraestructura pública. • Las colaboraciones activas en la planificación y el desarrollo de estrategias para promover el turismo y la utilización de recursos para estimular actividad económica. • Junto con los colaboradores de la comunidad, crear un plan comprehensivo de desarrollo económico. IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen a través de: • Los esfuerzos continuos para evaluar a la comunidad a través de los métodos tradicionales y la aplicación de nuevas tecnologías. • Proporcionar oportunidades para la involucración comunitaria a través de mesas directivas, comisiones, oportunidades para voluntarios, medios sociales, foros, y otros medios. • Una mejor coordinación entre las agencias y los constituyentes desarrollada durante la pandémica. • Los esfuerzos continuos de campañas para la mejoría de la identidad/imagen comunitaria que promuevan a la comunidad y a los éxitos organizacionales. • Una mejor participación y apoyo de los eventos culturales llevados a cabo dentro de la comunidad. • El apoyo de la Arts and Culture Commission (Comisión de Artes y Cultura) al promover la unidad y celebrar la diversidad a través de programas de arte y cultura. Para más información, visite www.pasco-wa.gov/councilgoals Page 354 of 354