HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022.01.24 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:20 PM - Monday, January 24, 2022
City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - The Pasco City Council
Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum
Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive
and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call (631) 992-3211 and use access code
613-585-088.
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
4 (a) Tri-City Dust Devils Season Recap
Presented by Derrel Ebert, General Manager for the Tri -City Dust
Devils Minor League Baseball Team
5 - 13 (b) Future Fire Station Considerations
14 - 19 (c) Fire Station 85 & Maple Street Extension
20 - 44 (d) SG Land Management LLC/Harris Road Annexation (ANX 2020-
001)
45 - 54 (e) Resolution - Interlocal Agreement for Columbia River Bacteria
Management Plan
Page 1 of 78
55 - 62 (f) Resolution - Bid Award for West Pasco Water Treatment Plant
Improvements (Phase 1)
63 (g) Council Voting Districts - Redistricting Discussion
64 - 72 (h) Local Finance Options - Income Tax
6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
(a) Consideration of the Minimum Offering Price for Sale or Lease of
Real Estate (if there’s a likelihood that disclosure would decrease
the price) per RCW 42.30.110(1)(c) (10 minutes)
8. ADJOURNMENT
9. ADDITIONAL NOTES
73 - 78 (a) Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only)
(b) REMINDERS
• Monday, January 24, 4:00 PM: Hanford Area Economic
Investment Fund Advisory Committee Meeting – Ben
Franklin Transit Main Conference Room
(COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Rep.)
• Wednesday, January 26, 7:30 AM: Visit Tri-Cities Board
Meeting – 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd., Kennewick
(COUNCILMEMBER ZAHRA ROACH, Rep.;
COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Alt.)
• Thursday, January 27, 4:00 PM: TRIDEC Board Meeting –
7130 W. Grandridge Blvd., Kennewick (COUNCILMEMBER
NIKKI TORRES, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE,
Alt.)
• Thursday, January 27, 5:30 PM: Benton Franklin
Community Action Connections Board Meeting – 720 Court
Street, Pasco (COUNCILMEMBER ZAHRA ROACH, Rep.;
COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Alt.)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
Clerk for assistance.
Page 2 of 78
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor
avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la
disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be
provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice
to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 3 of 78
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 5, 2022
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 1/24/22
FROM: Zach Ratkai, Director
Administrative & Community Services
SUBJECT: Tri-City Dust Devils Season Recap
I. REFERENCE(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presented by Derrel Ebert, General Manager for the Tri -City Dust Devils Minor
League Baseball Team
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 4 of 78
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 19, 2022
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 1/24/22
FROM: Bob Gear, Fire Chief
Fire Department
SUBJECT: Future Fire Station Considerations
I. REFERENCE(S):
Map of Current Station Locations and Their Service Areas
Station 81, 82, 83, & 84- 6 Minute Drive Time Analysis
2021 Map of Incidents
Proposed Station 85 Service Area Map
Proposed Station 87 Service Area Map
Map with Current and Proposed Stations 85 and 87 with 6 minute Drive Time
Analysis
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Current cost estimates are approximately $8 million per station. This is a one -
time cost to construct the Station. In addition, approximately $800,000 in
apparatus and equipment is needed.
Staffing a station is approximately $1.5 million per year per station depending
on the inclusion of ambulance units.
These numbers will increase over time.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City Council has been engaged with staff and the public over the past
several years to improve fire response capabilities and times, emergency
medical response, and services such as community risk reduction and resource
Page 5 of 78
navigation. In pursuing this course, the City Council has authorized several
major efforts:
• Utilization of banked property tax levy capacity to finance the construction
of new facilities.
• Relocation of Station 83 from Rd. 68 and Argent, to a new facility at
Sandifur and Rd. 76. Replacing an aging and inadequate Fire/EMS
facility located south of the service demand area with a larger state of the
art facility located in the heart of the service demand area. Completed in
2021.
• Construction of new Station 84, replacing a temporary station that was
authorized a couple of years earlier, the effect of which has been to
reduce response times and call loads from all stations. Station 84, located
on Court Street, is a state of the art Fire/EMS facility which also houses
Fire Administration.
• Significant upgrades to Stations 81 (Oregon Avenue) and Station 82
(Airport).
• Purchase of property for future Stations 85 and 87.
Beyond significant improvements in Fire/EMS capabilities and response times in
light of a rapidly growing population, the result of these and other improvements
in the Fire Department has been an improvement in the City's Washington State
Ratings Bureau (WSRB) from a Protection Class 5 to a Protection Class 3. The
improved rating has had a positive effect on fire insurance premiums for private
property owners across the community.
The current Council Goal is to maintain the WSRB Protection Class 3 Rating,
and respond to emergencies in 6 minutes or less 90% of the time.
V. DISCUSSION:
The City of Pasco has experienced extensive growth over the past decade and
anticipates more to occur in terms of population, residential units, commercial
and industrial square footage and land area of the City over the next 20 years.
Franklin County has recently expanded the City's urban growth area (UGA) to
accommodate an increase in population of 48,000 between 2019 and 2038
within the City's UGA.
In addition to the expanded UGA, as the Broadmoor and King City areas
continue to develop, the departments ability to respond in a timely manner is
challenged by the distance from current station locations. In addition to the
aforementioned, the department is experiencing increased demands on
currently available services. Call volume for 2021 is 18% over 2020 call
volumes. These are significant numbers that draw down available resources in
busier areas, requiring more distant stations to cover calls outside their service
area.
Page 6 of 78
The City has secured property for two future Fire Stations:
• The first parcel is on Road 100, South of the I-182 interchange
approximately 1 mile, at Maple Street. This is an ideal location to serve
not only the planned development on the Broadmoor area, but also
much of the Riverview area and planned development west of I-182 on
the river. This site is currently slated for Station 85. Preliminary design
work has started and will be ready if Council chooses to bid in two
phases with Phase 1- Right of Way Improvements in February 2022,
and Phase 2-Fire Station Construction in April 2022.
• The second parcel is located on the NW corner of the current AutoZone
site on Capitol Avenue. This property is designated as the future site of
Station 87. This Station will be well situated to serve the industrial
growth occurring in the immediate area, as well as the Colville Economic
Development projects, and Reimann Industrial Center being developed
by the Port of Pasco. Recent plans for the Reimann Center have added
some urgency to building this Station, as the Reimann Center is 6 miles
from our current Oregon Street Station (81), and as such would be
considered to have little or no fire protection.
Locating Station 86 in the Northwest area has been a bit more challenging as
we wait to see what the actual road network will be in that area. The current
County road network in that area tend to be long dead-ends with little to no
connectivity which have been developed within the past decade.
Page 7 of 78
l "“"«.,L,“1"_!Aq_L_"l’_“;,!31 ".‘
xv!
3.inn...\|‘r¥r'4v
h
t!
Pasco Fire ESZs
0.0 2.5
B5
>nCountyEmergencyServices
~-_—~-r:
W
p
<
V
mi
7r
ent
nLocations&ThrviceArea
TK
IB.
-;
—
>LA-_.~::,
Station Locations
81 -310 N Oregon Ave
82 -3502 Varney Ln (Airport)
83 -7510 Sandifur Pkwy
84 -4920 W Court St
Legend
Fire Stations
Railroad Tracks
River
5 4
_
«
00
it(I)
8
8Page 8 of 78
"*.'r«r~.«-.‘.“¥v;
gT
1 .
\*\.
\\
V
-
’
»-‘.--_,
‘?t .s’
L
i,
\‘.‘<4‘_"'\,‘I
\.,._:"*7
Norne:Fre0D(onNuIysvIPv'ononad -_,LA.¢-«-3
a.l 1'1..I ,0.‘.A.'\’,..J'.‘»“.,.u I452...:F»mgV..i
orocvuwuurn auuunnn-In-up
’9VOd-Cu.
.l .51!H,I.7 7
\mm ..
E ‘-7..2:3.3
2,‘u?s?a-.§.?":luI4J'
1'N3
|.u
'53
ital.
‘?t’ah“
r_s;n :43-is ann?wb-luluo-7.-.015
S.us:9%..-.
%.0.m1lUn.§...f
unau-1-out-1l
1.
2-DriveTime'sisforStations81,82,83,84
Thismap isbasedon an Origin Destinah‘onCoetMatrixAnaiyais
for Pasco,Washington?ne.The analysismeasures the least-cod
paths along our roads fromoriginto deaination.
Origin:Stations B182 &Proposed Stations 83 84
Destinations:all entrance eddres locationsin Pawo.
TheCost istirne in minutes and is based on the RANDTime
TravelEquationand Paco's road network.We set the Kvaiue at
2.0 and removed the vehicle-accelerationconstant.
Legend
-‘Hnsuui
Drive Time Analysis Raul:
MinimumEstimatedTravelTime in Minutes
~si.s
s:.o
«.5
so
<u.ito1rmoe>
Freon-d_Roe6u
DaceExported:
19 10:37
wmlv
u
m'.Nuer\sun,-uinn'w':'V'w?I-M?owennxp,.;mlFCMD.".'£B.’OL563‘A0IVEPO(¥‘l(9)1519,KitKat!"N.Dtbmt
%mWurnM.I...0D...
u..?n...u....I.$_n.?,.V .l.I!I:III.‘.Oo’I?nM.uU
JH:
§c=nQq
If
......|.%f§
,.?...m§._
AHLR.5,.“Page 9 of 78
aE.V'_"VA‘:
"".;9,'~.lv-1.4":'
_.«
.-—~§15}{-,-_.V-5':-va.v'
.!=Lix<M_..
5*u.‘.r,3,.
‘pg J-uTr5x,ijf2-‘.'w?I5'1
,.-?u
«-4»'
9‘
§-
«.4
r
‘z:s'kbi"'1Ji‘E.,'
Miles
I18/202_b Benc
3
0.0
MarCre ted 01.
Map P
F
D
2021MapofIncidents
1.0
"‘l""I.'.'
0.
5
1.52.02.5
7onCoun'EmeeServices
\
ESZ Call Totals
811 -21 836 -75
812 -25 841 —82
813 —389 842 -104
816-1298 843-158
821 -57 844 —310
822 -966 845 —391
823 -122 851 -208
824 —204 852 -286
825 -34 853 -15
832 -54 871 -154
834 -738 872 -12
835 -805
odlt
8
xx.
J Page 10 of 78
3URSRVHG(VUL+(5(*DUPLQ F 2SHQ6WUHHW0DSFRQWULEXWRUVDQGWKH*,6XVHUFRPPXQLW\7KLVPDSLVEDVHGRQDQ2ULJLQ'HVWLQDWLRQ&RVW0DWUL[$QDO\VLVIRU3DVFR:DVKLQJWRQ)LUH7KHDQDO\VLVPHDVXUHVWKHOHDVWFRVWSDWKVDORQJRXUURDGVIURPRULJLQWRGHVWLQDWLRQ'HVWLQDWLRQV DOOHQWUDQFHDGGUHVVORFDWLRQVLQ3DVFR7KH&RVWLVWLPHLQPLQXWHVDQGLVEDVHGRQWKH5$1'7LPH7UDYHO(TXDWLRQDQG3DVFR¶VURDGQHWZRUN:HVHWWKH.YDOXHDWDQGUHPRYHGWKHYHKLFOHDFFHOHUDWLRQFRQVWDQW'DWH([SRUWHG 30/HJHQG 3URSRVHGB5RDGV)LUH6WDWLRQ0LQLPXP(VWLPDWHG7UDYHO7LPHLQ0LQXWHV6HUYLFH$UHD5RDG&HQWHUOLQH1DPH :HE3XEOLVK3URSRVHGB)LUHB2'B&RVWB0RGLILHG2ULJLQ 3URSRVHG)LUH6WDWLRQ 0LOHV0DS 0LQXWH'ULYH7LPHIRU3URSRVHG6WDWLRQ6HUYLFH$UHD0DSPage 11 of 78
3URSRVHG(VUL+(5(*DUPLQ F 2SHQ6WUHHW0DSFRQWULEXWRUVDQGWKH*,6XVHUFRPPXQLW\7KLVPDSLVEDVHGRQDQ2ULJLQ'HVWLQDWLRQ&RVW0DWUL[$QDO\VLVIRU3DVFR:DVKLQJWRQ)LUH7KHDQDO\VLVPHDVXUHVWKHOHDVWFRVWSDWKVDORQJRXUURDGVIURPRULJLQWRGHVWLQDWLRQ'HVWLQDWLRQV DOOHQWUDQFHDGGUHVVORFDWLRQVLQ3DVFR7KH&RVWLVWLPHLQPLQXWHVDQGLVEDVHGRQWKH5$1'7LPH7UDYHO(TXDWLRQDQG3DVFR¶VURDGQHWZRUN:HVHWWKH.YDOXHDWDQGUHPRYHGWKHYHKLFOHDFFHOHUDWLRQFRQVWDQW'DWH([SRUWHG 30/HJHQG3URSRVHGB5RDGV*URXS)LUH6WDWLRQ3URSRVHGB0LQLPXP(VWLPDWHG7UDYHO7LPHLQ0LQXWHV6HUYLFH$UHD7R%UHDN5RDG&HQWHUOLQH1DPH :HE3XEOLVK3URSRVHGB)LUHB2'B&RVWB0RGLILHG2ULJLQ 3URSRVHG)LUH6WDWLRQ 0LOHV0DS 0LQXWH'ULYH7LPHIRU3URSRVHG)LUH6WDWLRQPage 12 of 78
3URSRVHG6WDWLRQ6WDWLRQ3URSRVHG3URSRVHG3URSRVHG(VUL+(5(*DUPLQ F 2SHQ6WUHHW0DSFRQWULEXWRUVDQGWKH*,6XVHUFRPPXQLW\7KLVPDSLVEDVHGRQDQ2ULJLQ'HVWLQDWLRQ&RVW0DWUL[$QDO\VLVIRU3DVFR:DVKLQJWRQ)LUH7KHDQDO\VLVPHDVXUHVWKHOHDVWFRVWSDWKVDORQJRXUURDGVIURPRULJLQWRGHVWLQDWLRQ'HVWLQDWLRQV DOOHQWUDQFHDGGUHVVORFDWLRQVLQ3DVFR7KH&RVWLVWLPHLQPLQXWHVDQGLVEDVHGRQWKH5$1'7LPH7UDYHO(TXDWLRQDQG3DVFR¶VURDGQHWZRUN:HVHWWKH.YDOXHDWDQGUHPRYHGWKHYHKLFOHDFFHOHUDWLRQFRQVWDQW'DWH([SRUWHG 30/HJHQG 3URSRVHGB5RDGV7HPSB)LUHB6WDWLRQVBB$OO0LQLPXP(VWLPDWHG7UDYHO7LPHLQ0LQXWHV RXWRIUDQJH!6HUYLFH$UHD5RDG&HQWHUOLQH1DPH :HE3XEOLVK3URSRVHGB)LUHB2'B&RVWB0RGLILHG2ULJLQ 6WDWLRQV 3URSRVHG6WDWLRQV0LOHV'ULYH7LPH$QDO\VLVIRU6WDWLRQV 3URSRVHG6WDWLRQVPage 13 of 78
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 19, 2022
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 1/24/22
FROM: Bob Gear, Fire Chief
Fire Department
SUBJECT: Fire Station 85 & Maple Street Extension
I. REFERENCE(S):
Aerial View of existing condition
Drawing of Proposed Maple Street Extension
Map of Proposed Maple Street Extension
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion of Extension of Maple Drive across City Property and Easement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Current estimate for Road 100 right-of-way work, utility re-location and Maple
Dr. extension to the back of the area used for future fire station construction is
$1.5 million.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City has made efforts over the past years to improve road connectivity and
traffic circulation in the Riverview area. In the Road 96 neighborhood, Council
and staff have received speeding and cut-through complaints on a regular basis
over the past several years due in large part to a lack of connectivity.
The City-owned property and future site of Fire Station 85 offers a rare
opportunity to implement a connection between Road 96 and Rd. 100 along the
Maple Dr. alignment. If this property were to be developed for private
development, the City would require the developer to extend Maple Dr. from
Road 100 to the current Maple Dr. cul-de-sac off of Road 96. This appears to
be the only opportunity to improve connectivity between Road 96 and Road 100.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 14 of 78
Staff and the consultant are currently in the process of design for the new station
and site improvements to the property. Through the site planning and review
process, staff identified the potential for improved connectivity mentioned above,
that entails the extension of Maple Dr. In addition to the street extension, the
project will provide improvements to Road 100, including widening, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, undergrounding of power lines and relocation of numerous
utilities including a Lumen vault on the Southwest corner of the property that has
a valid easement for its location, other utilities requiring relocation lack
easements and will be relocated at their expense.
An existing residence south of the city-owned property was constructed (in the
County) to provide for a future 30-foot half street right-of-way for a future Maple
Dr. extension, and that time has come. The development of half of Maple Dr. on
the property will have an impact on the property, better provisions should have
been required at the time the home was permitted to minimize the impact to the
private property to the South. Staff is proposing that the Maple Dr. extension
begin on the city-owned parcel and gradually sweep back to the proper
alignment east of the existing home located on t he property.
The intersection of the Maple Dr. west of Road 100 intersects at a sharp angle.
The current intersection geometry requires drivers entering Road 100 from
Maple Dr. to either look north over their shoulder for left turns, or to line up in the
oncoming lane before merging right. Sufficient right-of-way exists to realign the
intersection to provide a more perpendicular alignment. As part of the Station
85 project and associated Maple Dr. extension to the east of Road 100, Staff is
proposing to realign the existing intersection to provide for a perpendicular
alignment. This will improve general traffic safety and de-conflict the future fire
apparatus exiting the station onto Road 100.
The primary purpose of this presentation is to provide Council with an update on
the progress of the development of Station 85 and some of the issues and
opportunities to address current issues in the area as part of this project. A few
policy questions Council may wish to keep in mind or discuss this evening
include:
1. Establishing connectivity through the extension of Maple Dr. from Road
100 to Road 96 will require acquisition of future right -of-way; from the
parcel to the south at the time it develops further which will be relatively
straightforward, and additional remnants of property further east to
connect the future Maple Dr. to the cul-de-sac intersecting with Road 96.
Acquisition of the remnants could potentially require condemnation. On
the other hand, connectivity would drastically reduce emergency
response times into the Road 96 neighborhood, as well as address some
of the cut-through and speeding issues currently experienced due to very
limited connectivity in the area.
Page 15 of 78
2. If there is no interest in pursuing the extension of Maple St. to improve
connectivity, an early decision will save money and perhaps unnecessary
concern by potential property owners. Lack of connectivity through Maple
Dr. will ultimately result in a cul-de-sac backing up to another cul-de-sac
(Maple Dr. off of Road 96) as the City-owned parcel and parcel situated
immediately south are developed.
3. If the connection is not pursued, concern could be expressed by residents
in the area that the City is forgoing an opportunity to improve emergency
response times and putting them at greater risk.
The City is at a point in the development process where staff will be completing
final design and preparing a bid package for the civil improvements.
Staff looks forward to Council discussion and direction.
Page 16 of 78
Station 85 Area Legend
Feature 1
Station 85 property
600 ft
N➤➤NPage 17 of 78
112'-0"52$'9,6,7253$5.,1* 67$1'$5' ';1 ' 1 $'$&5(:3$5.,1* 12 67$1'$5' ';1 '2'-0" 1'-0"5($5<$5'6(7%$&.2'-0"52:0'-0")/$*32/(5($'(5%2$5'*(1(5$72575$6+(1&/2685(*(1(5$7256&5((120'-0"20'-0"87,/,7<(607 7%'
10'-0"39))87,/,7<(6077%'10'-0")38'(607
20'-0"
6,'(<5'6(7%$&.
10'-0"0$3/('5)5217<5'6(7%$&.2'-0"'&08)(1&( ( :22')(1&( 9(5,)</2&$7,21216,7( 1'-0"/$1'6&$3(6(7%$&.10'-0"$'-867('3523(57</,1()2552:(;,67,1*3523(57</,1( 6+2:1,1BLUE 352326E'1E:3523E57<L,1E620'5E6E59E')25 )U57U5E 52$'63 2-0
0'-2 "352326E'3523E57<L,1E*$60E7E50$3/('5),5(67$7,21)8785(0$3/('5,9(5226(9(/7:$<1257+($673URMHFW7LWOH 6KHHW7LWOH 3URMHFW1R 'DWH 6FDOH 6KHHW1XPEHU 6($77/(:$ WHO ID[ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
& ?8VHUV?ORUU\Q?'RFXPHQWV?3DVFR6WDWLRQB&HQWUDOBORUU\QUYWSATELLITE FIRE STATION 85A1.1A6,7(3/$1&217(;7 25RDG1003DVFR:$ 01&LW\RI3DVFRDESIGNDEVELOPMENT
6,7(3/$1)8//3$5&(/1R 'HVFULSWLRQ'DWH 112'-0"22121129,6,7253$5.,1* 67$1'$5' ';1 ''$ 1 $'$&5E:3$5.,1* 12 67$1'$5' ';1 ' 1'-0")L$*32LE*E1E5$72575$6+E1&L26U5E*E1E5$7256&5EE1UU777,,LL,,77<<777 EEEE607
1100''-0")3U'E600077
20'-0"
<<<5'6E77B$$$$&&...
10'-0"'&0U)E1&E1'-0"352326E'3523E57<L,1E*$60E7E57E$6$67EE6E6E7*$0),5(67$7,21<<<EREEEEEEEREERRETURE FIRFUUUUUUUFUUUUFUUUUFUFUTURE FIREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEFUFUFUUURUUUUUUEEEEEEFUFUFUUFUEEESITEETEETEETESTTESETTTEETETEEEETISEETTSITION 85 SSTATTASSATTASATTAATSSTTTAATTSTTATSTTATAATATSSTAATASSSTAAAAAAIIITTTTTTTEXISTINGPROPERTYLINESADJUSTEDPROPERTYLINES39)))ADJUSTEDUTILITYLOCATIONSEXISTINGUTILITYLOCATIONPage 18 of 78
Page 19 of 78
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 18, 2022
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
City Council Workshop
Meeting: 1/24/22
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: SG Land Management LLC/Harris Road Annexation (ANX 2020-001)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Overview Map
Proposed Annexation Ordinance
Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation
Assessor's Certificate of Sufficiency
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The addition of $318,000 to the assessed value of the City, expansion of
medium-density residential development and the commensurate responsibility
of providing government services to development.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On May 18, 2020, the City Council passed Resolution No. 3961 accepting a
"Notice and Intent" to commence annexation proceedings for the SG Land
Management LLC/Harris Road Annexation. Following the passage of the
Resolution, a final petition was submitted to the City.
The petition has been reviewed by the Franklin County Assessor's Office and
was determined to be sufficient to constitute a legally acceptable petition under
the petition method of annexation.
Page 20 of 78
In this case, the Notice of Intent contains the signatures of owners representing
100 percent of the assessed value within the proposed annexation area, as
described and depicted in the proposed ordinance.
The next step in the annexation process requires the City Council to conduct a
public hearing on the proposed annexation and decide whether to annex the
affected property.
V. DISCUSSION:
The proposed annexation will cause the area in question to be annexed to the
City subject to the following conditions:
1. The Pasco Comprehensive Plan will be applicable to the area.
2. The annexation area will assume proportionate and existing bonded
indebtedness.
3. The annexation area will be assigned to City Council District No. 5.
The Hearing Examiner conducted a zoning determination hearing for the
proposed annexation area on July 14, 2021 and recommended the area be
zoned R-3 (Medium-Density Residential). That recommendation will come to
Council as a quasi-judicial item following a decision on this proposed annexation.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the area as “Medium -High-Density
Residential” which may accommodate densities from 8-15 dwelling units per
acre, and allows for "Medium Density" and “Medium -High-Density Residential”
(MHDR) zoning. The City’s Comprehensive Plan has recently been updated and
approved by Council
The Medium Density Zoning Designations allow for single -family dwelling units,
townhouses, condominiums and multi-family units. In this case - the applicant
will also be pursuing a Planned Unit Development for developing a product with
special design and development measures which will also return to Council
accompanied by a recommendation from the Hearing Examiner.
This annexation item will return to Council on February 7, 2022 for conduct of
the formal public hearing on the annexation.
Page 21 of 78
CI
T
Y
L
I
M
I
T
S
CITY LIMITS
CITY LI
M
I
T
S
CITY LIMITS
ROAD 108W
C
O
U
R
T
S
t
SHO
R
E
L
I
N
E
Rd
HARRIS Rd CHAPEL HILL Blvd
CRESCENT RdHARRIS RdI-182 EI-182 W
Benton County WA, Pasco GIS, Maxar
0 710 1,400 2,100 2,800360
Feet
0 710 1,400 2,100 2,800360
Feet
Overview
Map
Item: Harris Road Annexation
Applicant: SG Properties LLC
File #: ZD 2020-002
Page 22 of 78
Ordinance - Harris Road Annexation ANX 2020-001 - 1
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
Attn: City Clerk
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
____________________________________________________________________________
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ANNEXATION AND ANNEXING
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF PASCO.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco received a petition application
completed by owners of no less than ten (10) percent of certain property, meeting the requirements
of RCW 35A.14.120; and
WHEREAS, a public meeting on the proposed annexation application was held on May
18, 2020, wherein City Council passed Resolution No. 3961, accepting the intent to annex and
determining the property to be annexed as set forth in Section 1 below (Property); and
WHEREAS, the City received a petition signed by not less than sixty (60) percent owners
of the Property; and
WHEREAS, the petition meets the requirements of RCW 35A.01.040 and has been
determined to be sufficient by the Franklin County Assessor; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on the proposed annexation has been published
and posted as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following described area, situated in Franklin County, Washington to-
wit:
That portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 9 North, Range 29
East, W.M. and the Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 9 North, Range 28
East, W.M., described as follows:
Page 23 of 78
Ordinance - Harris Road Annexation ANX 2020-001 - 2
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Section 18; Thence South 0°19’39”
West along the West line of said Section 40 feet to the Southerly right of way line
of Harris Road; Thence North 89°38’39” East along said right of way line 177.98
feet to the Northwest corner of Parcel “A” as shown on that Record of Survey
recorded in Book 3 of Surveys, Page 992, records of Franklin County, Washington,
and the Point of Beginning; Thence South 89°55’20” East along the North line of
Parcel “A” and Parcel “B” of said Survey 882.75 feet; Thence South 1°20’30” West
437.43 feet; Thence South 89°59’51” East 686.68 feet to the Easterly line of said
Parcel “B”; Thence South 3°04’35” East 216.66 feet to the Northwesterly right of
way line of State Route 182; Thence Southwesterly along said right of way line to
the intersection of the Northerly right of way line of Court Street; Thence
Southwesterly perpendicular to the Southerly right of way line of said Court Street
to a point on said Southerly right of way line; Thence Northwesterly along said
right of way line to the Easterly line of that portion of said Parcel “A” lying
Southerly of said Court Street; Thence South 87°50’12” West along said Easterly
line 19.06 feet; Thence South 35°08’12” West along said Easterly line 170.80 feet
to the most Southerly corner of said Parcel “A”; Thence North 55°07’35” West
along the Southerly line of said Parcel “A” 154.46 feet to the Southwest corner of
said Parcel “A”; Thence North 0°21’56” East along the Westerly line of said Parcel
“A” 288.77 feet to the Northerly right of way line of said Court Street; Thence
Northwesterly along said right of way line to the most Westerly corner of said
Parcel “A”; Thence North 21°47’33” East 82.11 feet; Thence North 74°31’02” East
185.00 feet; Thence North 0°19’30” East 1074.27 feet to the Point of Beginning;
(Franklin County Assessor’s Parcels 118180068 and 118180139)
Situated in Franklin County, Washington.
Together with and subject to Easements, Reservations, Covenants, and Restrictions, of
record and in View, as depicted in the map attached hereto and labeled Exhibit A.
Section 2. That the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Pasco be and the same is hereby
adopted for the above described tract of land.
Section 3. That said tract of land shall be required to assume any portion of the existing
bonded indebtedness of the City of Pasco.
Section 4. That said tract of land shall be in Voting District No. 5.
Section 5. That a certified copy of this ordinance be and the same shall be filed with the
Franklin County Commissioners.
Section 6. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval,
passage and publication as required by law.
Page 24 of 78
Ordinance - Harris Road Annexation ANX 2020-001 - 3
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ___ day of
_______________, 20__.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Published: ________________________
Page 25 of 78
C
OLUMBIA RIVER
C
OLUMBIA RIVER CITY LIMITSCITY LIMITSCITY LIMITS
Parcel
118180068 Parcel
118180139
VI
E
W
Ln
SH
O
R
E
L
I
N
E
Ct
IONE St
WATERS
EDGE Dr
SH
A
D
Y
L
nROAD 111HARRIS Rd
W
C
O
U
R
T
S
t
HARRIS Rd
I-182 EI-182 W
0 280 560 840 1,100140
Feet
"Exhibit A"
Item: Harris Road Annexation
Applicant: SG Properties LLC
File #: ZD 2020-002
Page 26 of 78
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF PASCO
TO: The City Council of the City of Pasco
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco, Washington 99301
The undersigned, being the owners of not less than fifty percent (50%), in value,
according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of the real property described in
Exhibit "1" attached hereto, lying contiguous to the City of Pasco, Washington, do hereby
petition that such territory be annexed to and made a part of the City of Pasco under the
provisions of RCW 35.14.120, et seq., and any amendments thereto, of the State of
Washington.
The territory proposed to be annexed is within Franklin County, Washington, and is
described in Exhibit "1," attached hereto.
WHEREFORE, the undersigA,ed respectively petition the Honorable City Council and
ask:
a)That appropriate action be taken to entertain this petition, fixing a date for a
public hearing, causing notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of
such hearing, and inviting all persons interested to appear and voice approval or
disapproval of such annexation; and,
b)That following such hearing the City Council determine by Ordinance that
such annexation shall be effective; and that property so annexed shall become a part of the
City of Pasco, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter enforced.
The Petitioners subscribing hereto agree that all property within the territory
hereby sought to be annexed shall assume any existing indebtedness but will not require
simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations in accordance with the City Council's
acceptance of the Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation as indicated in Resolution
No. 3961 as recorded in the May 18, 2020 Council minutes of the City of Pasco,
Washington.
This Petition is accompanied by a diagram, as attached hereto as Exhibit "2" which
outlines the boundaries of the property sought to be annexed.
1
Page 27 of 78
Page 28 of 78
Page 29 of 78
WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his/her name,
or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an
election when he/she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he/she is otherwise not
qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor.
PRAYER OF PETITION: (1) Annexation of area described and depicted in Exhibits "1" and
"2", with (2) assumption of indebtedness of the City of Pasco but without (3) simultaneous
adoption of the City of Pasco Zoning Regulations.
OWNER'S SIGNATURE PRINT NAME/ADDRESS DATE SIGNED
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
2 Page 30 of 78
SURIIEYOR'S NARRAIIYf· l000( RECORD SURVEY
�� !iii� 1,1
FOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
IN THE NW 1/4, SEC. 18, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST. & IN THE NE 1/4, SEC. 13, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 28 EAST, W.M. FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
f)I), 2" WA9i. DOT. POSITlON CX>WPIJTf.D / :�MO:.PE� HNI. �
FRON :MM:'Y 159& /
/
/ /
�1fr I I I
NOT F'OUNO THIS SURYEY X /
...-1!'.�'.1'2.'17.11.:__ 12, ___________ ..!:f!,l?R§._R�P, _____ j ______ �,0•2 n_2040�•---·--··--·-··-··-··-··---·-./-13 18 SM'55'20"E SM"55'20"'E: _ -/ 19 us •n.od 405.75· - - - - - - -/ IDT 1 �·22-w 175.12' /
1•-200' -+-
111I III l I I I� I �'1' 18 I I I, I , I l \ I I
-Jl', .. ;t.J..�� '1) �-·� ..... ) :,.,,�""
���-
\\\
CAP I\.'' '"
\\\���
I ' '-: ', ' I ''� I �:11>,• '-. '..._,_ I ,_,., �� '-l q,. j' ',, �->.}'-tr� �Oi, ', 'tl) • ''tt).-',,,. 1.-r:,,.�-\;, ',,.... �', ',
�
I
. 1 �-.r �I
f'-fl
�I
I
�i �i
PARCEL •t,,.• 15,UJ ACRES
3� ;;�;!i
""""'-,,. 22.T7 ACRES
�I�!
S.P.f 2010-13 savsa·�-w J09,32"
t.ar 2, SHORT Pl.AT f2010-13
SM"st'51 "E 886.88'
30· UTILITY [SM�. 111, A.F.f1enoo• I I
I�� ,�,�Ii.
111 -------�PNici:i-tK-------rir-�:--�j
.�·
�-<,_tc)r
,.,,. ,'oi
0"'-t-
iO
F'OOP£R'lY UNE T.ta.£ lM l)ftC1l(lN LfMCTH L1 SJ"04'35"E 21&.H
u S29"48'08-W 00.27
/
/ / PARCQ.. 1, R.OS. '598 / NOT A PMT Of THIS SUIM.Y / /
/
/ / / / / /
NOTES:
/ SECTION 13 ltMNSHI' • """"' RANCE 26 EAST W.M. SECTION 18 11lWNSHIP • NORTli RANGE 29 fASf WM. r··,--·-,-··....,.�%�--· ··-r-·7 . I I V.1. � I . · I I I · r--�---L..--¼--�--iI I I � I I : I I I . I I : r--➔--+--l---�--+--l---i : : :. : : :. r--;---r----r--+--;---r----r--i . I I I . I I I I I I I I I L .. ..L .. ...J.... •. ...L.. .. ...L .. ...1... .. ..L .. ...L..,.J
SECTION INDEX
fWi!S Of 81:MNC IS WASHltrtGTON STAT[ Pl.ME <iRO (S01m4 ZONE) IW)_SJ{2011), DA1'\JM M.SEI) ON GNSS 08SERYA1lONS 0� THE OONTROlUNG CORNERS SHOWN HEREON. 1. 0 •DOICJTES SET s;e•,:2,4• REBM: 'Mffl YEllDW PlASTIC C>P STAMPE> � LSfJ0440 2. e -DEHCJTES FWND 5/8" REat.R: PER SURVEY NO. 178 J. • •ODKn'ES f'OUND s;a• REHM STNl!Pm -slRAffl)N" AS SHOWN ON SHORT PUT 2010-13 FND. U.S.A.C.E. BRASS CW STAMPED: SS 22-22 0ELD fOR SECTllN UNE)
',, lJ NOO'J3'22"E 11.3& 4. 0•0ENOTES CALCULATED POSmoN ONLY-CORNER NOT SCT PER SHORT PLAT 2010-13 Oft PU 'THIS SURVEY
CWW.Tot,1• CURVE l£NGTH RADIUS DELTA Qi. BRNG. 010RO C1 164.45 4252.75 2'12"Jr NM'59'24"'W 154.4-4
SURVE YOR'S CERTIFJCATE THIS MN' COAR£CTLY REPRESEN'1S A SU� M.trDE: 8'f ME OR WUR MY DIRECTION ... COHfORW,NCE WfTH THE R£QUIRDIENTS CE 1HE SUfNEY RECORDING N:r AT ll-!E REQUEST OF HMRIS fJIMILY TRUST .. OCTOBER, 2011.
GARY 8. WACN£A PlSf30440
0,1[
200 100
l4 S!Si5'51'f7"E LO S55'51'1TE l4 S21"47"33"W l7 N74"31'02"E
,.. HW3B'3i"E u H87'50'12"E l10 N35'08'12"E l11 S5507'35"E L13 S55'51'18"E ' I"' S0'21'51"W "'-
200 400
SCALEINFID
129.b4
=,11 82.11 185.00 177.H ,. ... 170.80 154.48 203.23 1 .....
000
5. (M) • MfASURED PER MS SlM\C' (RI) • RECORD PER SURVEY #978 S. TI-IS SURVEY DOES NOT PUIIPORT ID SHOW Al..l EASEWMS or RECORD. 7, COURT STRffi RIGHT Of WI« IN SEC110N 18 WAS OCT'ERMINED FROM A flEl.D AS-BUILD Of lME EXISTING CENTERl..JNE WHICH VARIES CONSIOEFW!l.Y FROM & FROM lHE AIJGfMENT SHOWN OM tWtilS SUBDMSK>N. 19. THIS SUIM:Y '-.s PEN'OF.tilED UTUZlHG 'TRIMBI.E MULTI FREQUENCY GNSS REC£NERS CONFIGURED FOR R£AI.. TIME KIHEW.TIC �
AUDITOR'S CERT IFICATE AL£D fOR RECORD THIS __ MY Of ____ _ 20--AT __M. IN ""'-'"" __ OF SURVEYS. AT PN:iE __ AT lH£ REQUEST OF ROGERS SURVEYING.
F'RNOQJN COUNT'r AI.OTOR !iJc��ROGERS -
SURYltYINC INC., P.S,
1466 co.tUDIA pjltl rlU1l, AICIIUJQ, ..... � �<J:.°!>1:l�i�1 YW.r•••w�oom.
Cl.ENT
PROJECT
MH>frOR's FlL.L NUMBER -NONC
HARRIS IJVJNG TRUST
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
PORTION OF SEC. 1 B, T9N., R29E DRN.'1iY 1------G8W I SCALE ,._ 200· I F. ·a.-NO. � I APPR<MD GBW MlE 10 /07 /19 � VER:,1 4�11
JOO 31419
stEET...! � Page 31 of 78
NEW LfGAL DESCR1PTIONS·
FOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
IN THE NW 1/4, SEC. 18, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, & IN THE NE 1/4, SEC. 13, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 28 EAST, W.M. FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHJNGTON
Al/DITOR'S CERTIFICATE Page 32 of 78
Affidavit of Signature for
Annexation Notice of Intent and Petition
Under the penalty of perjury, I declare under oath, that I am authorized to sign deeds and
encumbrances on behalf of .SC--/Jvo p<-,,.J,'e.� llc__, and I am further
authorized to sign other documents including Notices of Intent and Petitions.
Signature
State of Washington
County of f, c.v\..\c,1'
): ss.
)
I /2'3/2.o-Z. 0== Date
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that £t.:\<-< 5 ;,-r.-t.'r-... "'--is the person who appeared
b fore me, and said person acknowledged that�she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that
she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as
____________ of _____________ to be the free and voluntary act
of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument .
.,. "'
Given under my hand and official seal this 1..!__ day of 'J "'"'½K':f a� I 2020
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
Residing at: -�-'--'-'�,....,.__,,_u ________ _
My Commission Expires: i \-'2. C..- '2 I.)
Page 33 of 78
1.Please print your name in addition to signing.
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS DATE
Page 34 of 78
September 13, 2021
FRANKLIN COUNTY ASSESSOR
JOHN A. ROSENAU -ASSESSOR
PIPER MITCHELL -CHIEF DEPUTY
NIKKI MORGAN -CHIEF APPRAISER
VALIDATION OF ANNEXATION PETITION
I, John A Rosenau, Franklin County Assessor, do hereby certify that the petition for annexation provided by
the City of Pasco known as the Harris Rd Project 20191 Annexation Project located and described in Exhibit
"1 Parcels A & B Attached, County Parcels 118180139 & 118180068 is sufficient as far as the percentage of
valuation required for the annexation.
The specific validation is as follows:
VALUE SIGN ATURES
$1,942,800.00 $1,942,800.00
ATTEST:
John A Rosenau
FRANKLIN COUNTY ASSESSOR
PERCENTAGE
100%
Franklin County Assessor
1016 N 4th
Pasco, WA 99301
Phone: 509-545-3506
Fax: 509-546-5840
Email: jrosenau@co. frank/in. wa.us
Page 35 of 78
September 3, 2021
City of Pasco
Harris Annexation
HLA Project No. 20191
Legal Description for Annexation
That portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M. and the
Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 9 North, Range 28 East, W.M., described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Secti on 18;
Thence South 0°19'39" West along the West line of said Section 40 feet to the Southerly right of way
line of Harris Road;
Thence North 89°38'39" East along said right of way line 177.98 feet to the Northwest corner of Parcel
"A" as shown on that Record of Survey recorded in Book 3 of Surveys, Page 992, records of Franklin
County, Washington, and the Point of Beginning;
Thence South 89°55'20" East along the North line of Parcel "A" and Parcel "B" of said Survey 882.75
feet;
Thence South 1 °20'30" West 437.43 feet;
Thence South 89°59'51" East 686.68 feet to the Easterly line of said Parcel "B";
Thence South 3°04'35" East 216.66 feet to the Northwesterly right of way line of State Route 182;
Thence Southwesterly along said right of way line to the intersection of the Northerly right of way line of
Court Street;
Thence Southwesterly perpendicular to the Southerly right way line of said Court Street to a point on
said Southerly right of way line;
Thence Northwesterly along said right of way line to the Easterly line of that portion of said Parcel "A"
lying Southerly of said Court Street;
Thence South 87 °50'12" West along said Easterly line 19.06 feet;
Thence South 35°08'12" West along said Easterly line 170.80 feet to the most Southerly corner of said
Parcel "A";
Thence North 55°07'35" West along the Southerly line of said Parcel "A" 154.46 feet to the Southwest
corner of said Parcel "A";
Thence North 0°21'56" East along the Westerly line of said Parcel "A" 288.77 feet to the Northerly right
of way line of said Court Street;
Thence Northwesterly along said right of way line to the most Westerly corner of said Parcel "A";
Thence North 21 °47'33" East 82.11 feet;
Thence North 74 °31'02" East 185.00 feet;
Thence North 0°19'30" East 1074.27 feet to the Point of Beginning;
Situate in Franklin County, Washington.
Page 36 of 78
NW COR, SEC. 1 B, T.9N., R.29E., W.M.EXISTING CITY LIMITS LINE
HARRIS ROAD-----..,____ _____ _
C o<'.u, /�S1. / '-1
/N
/W ♦E O
s
� POINT OF
� BEGINNING
z
LL
250 500
+.._♦HLA � Engineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
2803 River Road
Yakima, WA 98902
509.966.7000 Fax 509.965.3800
www.blaciviLcom
SEPT. 3, 2021
PROJ: 20191
REVIEW: ETH
DRAWN: TDF
��<:cP o
�..:)� 'i(-c-:,0
,.�� �<?
�'<"' . �....I.. 0 'o'l,c,' <v "'�-<:. <?:-0
�.;:.<v
C":,
CITY OF PASCO
"HARRIS ANNEXATION"
CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, STATE OF WASHINGTON Page 37 of 78
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEDURES
TO: The City Council of the City of Pasco
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco, Washington 99301
Council Members:
The undersigned, who are the owners of not less than ten percent in value, according to
the assessed valuation for general taxation of the property for which annexation is
sought, hereby advise the City Council of the City of Pasco that it is the desire of the
undersigned owners of the following area to commence annexation proceedings.
The property herein referred to is described on Exhibit "1" attached hereto and is
depicted on Exhibit "2" further attached hereto.
It is requested that the City Council of the City of Pasco set a date not later than sixty
days after the filing of this request for a meeting with the undersigned to determine:
(1)Whether the City Council will accept the proposed annexation; and,
(2)Whether the City Council will require the assumption of existing City
indebtedness by the area to be annexed; and,
(3)Whether the City Council will require simultaneous zoning.
This page is one of a group of pages containing identical text material and is intended by
the signers of this Notice of Intention to be presented and considered as one Notice of
Intention and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which
cumulatively may be considered as a single Notice of Intention.
Page 38 of 78
Parcel "A" (APN #118 180 068):
Harris Annexation Legal
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST AND THAT
PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH RANGE 28 EAST, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00°19'39" WEST, 40.00 FEET
ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18 TO A 5/8" REBAR STAMPED "WORLEY" ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF
WAY OF HARRIS ROAD; THENCE NORTH 89°38'39" EAST, 177.98 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY TO A5/8" REBAR
STAMPED "WORLEY" AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: (SAID CORNER BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
PARCEL 1 OF RECORD SURVEY NO. 978 RECORDED IN AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1686716, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN
COUNTY); THENCE SOUTH 89°55'20" EAST, 477.00 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE SOUTH 00°19'30"
WEST, 1021.10 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 34°08'44" WEST, 532.53 FEET
TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF COURT STREET; THENCE NORTH 55°51'17" WEST, 467.81 FEET ALONG SAID
RIGHT OF WAY TO A 5/8" REBAR STAMPED "WORLEY" MARKING THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1
AFOREMENTIONED; THENCE NORTH 21°47'33" EAST, 82.11 FEET ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL TO A
5/8" REBAR ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, NORTH
74°31'02" EAST, 185.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00'19'30" EAST, 1074.27 FEET ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID PARCEL
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00 °19'39" WEST, 1162.58 FEET
ALONG THE WEST LINE THEREOF TO A 5/8" REBAR MARKING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 18, SOUTH 00°21'56" WEST, 168.59
FEET TO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF COURT STREET AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
CONTINUING SOUTH 00°21'56" WEST, 216.68 FEET TO A U.S.A.C.E. BRASS CAP ON THE McNARY PROJECT
BOUNDARY; THENCE SOUTH 55 °07'35" EAST, 154.46 FEET ALONG SAID BOUNDARY TO THE MOST WESTERLY
CORNER OF LOT 14, PLAT OF HARRIS SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME C OF
PLATS, PAGE 92, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 35'08'12" EAST, 170.80 FEET ALONG THE WEST
LINE OF SAID LOT 14; THENCE NORTH 87°50'12"' EAST, 19.06 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF COURT
STREET; THENCE NORTH 55°51'16" WEST, 293.23 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 15.93 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Parcel "B" (APN #118 180 139):
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18. TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 18; THENCE SOUTH 00°19'39" WEST,
40.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 18 TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF HARRIS ROAD;
THENCE NORTH 89°38'39" EAST 177.98 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY; SOUTH 89°55'20" EAST, 477.00 FEET
ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
Page 39 of 78
THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 89°55'20" EAST. 405. 75 FEET TO A 5/8" REBAR STAMPED "STRATTON" MARKING THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2, SHORT PLAT NO. 2010-13 ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY THEREOF, RECORDED IN
VOLUME 1 OF SHORT PLATS, PAGE 834, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 01°20'30" WEST, 437.43
FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2 TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 89°59'51" EAST,
686.68 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT TO A 5/8" REBAR STAMPED "STRATTON" MARKING THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2; THENCE SOUTH 03°04'35" EAST, 216.66 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SHORT PLAT TO A 5/8" REBAR STAMPED "ROGERS" ON THE WESTERLY
RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROUTE 182;THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY THE FOLLOWING FIVE
COURSES: THENCE SOUTH 49°14'59" WEST, 250.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53°09'39" WEST, 150.33 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 51 °38'31" WEST, 1000.40 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 32°59'13" WEST, 104.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21°44'58"
WEST, 12.90 FEET TO A POINT OF NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT
OF WAY OF WEST COURT STREET; (THE LONG CHORD OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 54°59'24" WEST, 164.44 FEET)
THENCE WESTERLY, 164.45 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY ON THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 02 °12'37"; THENCE NORTH 55°51'17" WEST, 129.54 FEET ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY; THENCE NORTH
34°08'44" EAST, 532.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°19'30" EAST, 1021.10 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 22.77 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
Page 40 of 78
SUBYEXQR's NARRAJM;· RECORD SURVEY )000(
i§
FOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT IN THE NW 1/4, SEC. 18, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, & IN THE NE 1/4, SEC. 13, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 28 EAST, W.M. FRANI<IJN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
/ / ,fa � /
ii ii NOT Fl)IN) 1H15 """""'X / I ""'- r _,_ ""'· POSmON co11PUTU1 /
. l::c"'...:�-"i ,_......,.,... ,, __ fr -�S,.'."_!97.1,.:__ -Z---··-· _serM'20'E�.RR§..�---.·-'·-··-··�n_•":"'-2!'' .. ____ -··--·-··--·-··-.--··-;/·--· I -· -· -· -· ts tn.od -:=;-c ---------/19
, . '22-W 11.s.,r / I I I I � i:;_,, 20,0-1> /
,·-200· -+-
'I' "' ...... -..... :,00.32• /
I I � ; """"11. '· •.o.s. ,...
/ /
11 L �-,�, -n �..;;;,. ;r.g'-JEll i;! ,� NOT. ,.,..,.OFntlS 6UIMY / , 1,� QJ!;--.'f;;;rl.��-''�"'" I � IDT'· -P>.4lf••·•-•· Is //
I Is 3/��d9· I I� /
1 1 18 \ill""' �: � � ........ ,... ....... $. /,,
1 I 1 ::I � a ,1 L /,, I I ,.. ' l 31/unurrEWt I I �, • ; A.F.f18110ffll // l I l �, i
\ \ \
\ \\_ \\\ 1,,,� .. uJ.=-'CN' : ' I " '-: � ..... ,, I S�· ..... -....:::: ...... ',<,�),q. ..... �
i
I .� \t , ..NOTES:
SET10N 1J """"""""""""' lW«Z'. 28 EAST W.11. SE.cnDN 18 lt'WHSHI' 9 NOfll1i RNIGE 29 £>.Sr W,11. �--1-·T··-v/7'1/�;x-.. .T .. , r--➔---1.. __ t(/��--�--1 . I I I I I . . I I I-� I I. r---1--+--1---�--+--f---1 : : :. : : : . r--1---i---r--t--1---i---r--1 . I I I . I I I • I I I I I I · L .. ...&... •• -L... •. ....L.. •• .J.... .. J.... .• .....L...., .J... •. J SECTION INDEX
',, �>a}'O$ ..... "-i.a;, ....... ·-1,..• � \\ �IJNETAIU BJISIS Of' EEJaNG IS WASHINGf0N sr.-TE PLINE '11:10 (SDl.nM ZONE) tW)_BJ{ZOII). DAlUII USED ON GNSS Q!ISEJN'ATIOHS 0� ll£ t;:ONIRDl1JNO CORNERS SHOIMt H0EoN. ........ --,� ................ �.:, ................ �I� ', Flm. U.S.A.C.E. l!IRASS CN> SIMIPED: S'S 22-22 (MELD FOR SECmN UNO
C....Tot,1• CUfM I WtC:IH t RADIUS I DELTA I Qi. 9RNG. I otoRD C1 I tN.45 I 42N-7S I rt2'37"1 f61."M'24"W I 1M.44
/ /
I I I
�
�PNIC<l.lHJ
¾r,4 ,:::s.,f.o '-"' c, � IHWR/$ J -"), ........ ...t .... .SU!>�2/ ';.., "
,/SUIJ./ /' ..........
/ / "-,,/
/
/ ,,, X, ..... ' / I
' / / ' "'
-1,-,,.,., 1-"S.J'04'.15"E 2111.11 L2 S2t"4&'0B"'W .., .. ,
u N50"l.1'22"'E 11.36 L4 S!55'!t1"17"t , .....Ill 5'5'51'17"'E 481.1!11 Ill S21•4T3J"W 82.11 L7 N74".51'02"[ 180.00 .. NS31!1'3e-E 177.18 L9 N17"90"1r'E ,...,. l!O Nl5'D8'12-C 170.IIC L11 S55'07'M"'E 114.48 L!• 555",1·11-r ....... ( l14 Sll"21'M:'"I 118 ...
I. 0 -oomt:s SET 5/8">24• RElWt WllH -.ru.tlW PI.AS11C CN' S1JIIMP£D "G9W" I.Sf,o,MO 2. • -O£NOJt!: FOUND &/8• R£BM PER SUNEY NO. 978 ;-5. )I( •DO«:J'fB FUUND wa• fl£BltR !TM.Pm �Tn)N9 AS 5J,40IN ON SM0RT Pt.AT 2010-1:S 4. 0•000ES CM.CULATEU POSrT10N ONLY-CORNER NQf SET POI SHORr PlAT 2010-13 0A Pb THIS 5UMY �-(II) • � P!R ntlS SllMl' (A1) • A£COA:D PDt SUIMY 1171 8. 1tts SURYE'I' DoEii HOf """""°"'" TO S>t0III � 1 fASDIEMS OF' Rl'CORD. 7. COURT SJlll[H RIGHT or WXf IN SE'.c'IION 11 -.S �lNED FROM A na.o AS-BUU.D Of lt1[ EnSTING CVfTEIIJNE WHICH VARIES CQNS10fJWll.Y mot, 11 nlDM M AUGMt!DIT S>tOWN ON fwtRIS SUSDMSION. 8, lHIS Slll'll£r Wt:5 PDtf"QfiMED UTI.Q.NG 'TJIIIIMl!llE IIUl..11 FlltDUENC'I' IJrl5S RECtMllS C0""1GUtCD FOR fl9l. 'IIIIEklC�TIC�
AUDITOR'S CERTJFJCATE FUD FOR R£CORD '1'MIS _ DAY M ---�--2Q_., 4l ---"• IN \'ti.WE -- Of $\RIO'S, AT pa -- Ill THE REQUE31' or ROGERS SURYEYINC.
S\JRYEYOR'S CERTIFJCATE THIS W,, OOltR£Cll.V t!:E� II SUMY IWX. 8'r I« DA UtllOI 1ft' tlAt:CllON ,. CONF'OfllMNCE WffH 111£ REQURDID(JS c, fflE SlMM"r lll£CORONG N!f 111 THE A£QUEST OF H.lltRIS r.at.Y 1lt\JST" .. OCf0etl, 2011ii1.
GARY' B. WM.NER PL.SflGWO -200 100 0 200
sc,u: I< FEET
... 100
FRolNKtJN COUNTY AlDTOR
('j{Jfjj�••c•=
SURVll'nNC INC., P.B. '"" CDiWJmU NlfZ rJW£ I ..,.,,..,,.,...._,._ :::.nJ::r>T:r;:::t IS IO IA 11¥
CL.ENI
P90JECr
-.ar
MJDffOf(S FILE HUWJER
..., M#<C
HARRIS IJVING THU&"!'
BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT
PORTION Of" SEC. 1 B, T9N., R29E -StlilE 1•• UIO' F. I. NO, ...-.... -IO{_rJl/11 IOIJ YE]II -2019 FU; Jl1411
l�,liil
1:m·Page 41 of 78
RECORD SURVEY
NE'.W L£CIJ PESCBIPIIPHS·
FOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT IN THE NW 1/4. SEC. 18, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, & IN THE NE 1/4. SEC. 13, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTII, RANGE 28 EAST, W.M. FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON PMa)..·•·
™"T tllClfflOIII a, THE NDlfftffllSI' GUNMA 0, SD:Tl0N UI, � • NOlffll. MHllE: D DST MO ,._, � Of lME NORfHEUI' Ql.wnD o, 5tCTl0N 13. 'ftMIStllP t N0Rnf � 211 rAST. Ol:stlllltl>IISJl)U.OIS:
CDMWOOC AT THE NClffMlllSJ COtlNDI Of SM:! SEcn0N \I; 1MDCI: SDUn4 IX111'll• W[ST, 40.00 FtET '-LllC THE IIISJ l.9€ a, SAID SECQON 18 TO n£ 90Un0L.Y Nff Of 11W' Of' ....-S � TNDIJC ta'IM •w»• WT, \77.811 FED AU»IG SM> ltaHT a, WM' TO A 6/W"' RQIII STJIIPQJ "'WIUY" Ml) ntE TINE POlff al 8£.CINHQ (SM> PCMff IIE:IC 1tlE Nl)ffitMSI C0RNOt r:11' ntl\T PMCl1. 0, UNI 9QIIN ON l900III> 5UIMY IIE'tDl)Q) N I.OU.A« 2 ar SU1YCn. PG: 171,. � or '1WNJN tOUtffl'); l1tO«X 90Uft4 ans·m- mr. tT1.CG rttr MJ:IC SW AJQff OF Wi\'f: � � OV1llJ'30• 111:ST, 1021.10 FUT PNtAU& 'WITH 11« IIUI' LJIIIE OF SM> PMCO; 'ntbQ DnH )4"_.41. IIIEST, 532..5J Fllfl' 1'0 n£ NOlffiOI.Y IIOC1' 0, _. 0f C0l.lff S111rD: � N0llfM ,.,..,,. Wl31;. 497 .. t nu MllNC SAD ,..... or .. 'TO A 511· ftl1Wt STAMPED� IMAICINC lHE � taNJI o, 5e PMCn � fHOICt N0ffflf 21'4T� tA$1', la.11 RE1' Mote 1HE '°'1JI..Y lM 0f' SAG PMCIL fl) A ,ta• fll:llNI C11 M Wf:ST lK OI WJ SCftCIN 19; lt40CE tOffll 14'3t"Dr £Mf. 118.00 REr. lMDIC( N0MH CIP11'3C)• US'I', 1074.27 f'EIT lD M 'nlU£ PmiT OF' lll[QNJalC.
� 1MIT P0fffl0N Of WD MoafMST GWfl'DI 0/F srrT'DI IS. OE5a&J> A9 J'0U.OIIS!
CC'JIAIOc:ac. Al 1ltE lt£ � COIINJt OIi SAO E'll>N 18; 1t4DIC[ SCM'H 0719'»• 11U1, 11G.SI FtrT MONC. 1HE WISI lN'. '1911Df ,0 A 5/r lilllWI' .,._ 1M MCILE P0l(t • THE. � LI€ THE: 18M: OCD:IIEJ PNICO,: lMOa: $IM'H C1721"511• 111'.ST, 11&51 ,u:t" TD 114[ NllnHEl..'1' ...W or M'f Df COUIIIT srREE' -.0 TH£ .,,.._ ..a,wr OT .r.:INNING: ncJC( � !11.JTM 00'21'$1'"' waT, 211.U Fm 10 A U.5.A.C.(. M1r1S! C#IP 0N THE lllc::N,lf"( ll'RDe:,' m.tf01RYt lHDQ: SIOUni ll"DT»• [IQ. 1,M.-41 FE 11&.aNC SM) DJtCWl't 1U T..: ll&'l$f Wf::fflJI.T aN90: Of lO'I 14, PIAT OF' H,tfWS � /ICCQllmt,1; 1D 1Hl. fl\AI lkOS0f" IU:IIRDED II '101.Wt C a, PIATS. PA« e. fEXlllllZ a, RWeQJN CQMn; TMJa 1Ja11tt 3S'Cl8'1r rAST. 110.m ,ur MlNi 1HE WISI UJra. 0/F MIO I.Of 14: lMDG. NDRn-4 87SD'ta• £.AST, 1111.DI ,m TO M �y Ran' or .., ar COJWr snu:r: THENCE NORTH ,se,1·11· war, wn nn lilJ>NC s-., ltDtT or .. 10 TNE T1ld. POllr a, 11EGNaC.
� 1&.'3 ACfllEJ. � OR u;ss.
Nllal."I'
nMf fll0«n0N OF' THE NIJllfflfll5T O\WfflJI 0, !D:1'ION II. �· 0 Namt llllfQ: D US'T Daala:D - f'OU.DW5:
c:OlalODIO AT ntE tOlltflCf CfflllHOI Of IND stcrDI 18; n£NCC SOUfH OCT19"3r KST. ilQ.00 fmAiiaa::: n€1111fflN Of SAIDSE.'Cll)N ti to MIOUltOLY IQff MMt'OftWltlS 91C»o: 1HENC1: NmrrM 11"31'»• wr, ,n.u ,m "'-ONO sai1D RIGHT a,""'= SCMM erM'1G· OS\ •n.oo '11T .tU)NQ $-«I flGKT Of _, TD 1NE TIU: P0WJ Of ltQfMNC: 1MDIX CICINNAMC SOlffM �����::'20�t,vr������ .. m 9tOllff Pl.Aft, PG 834, 11l'OOACS 0/f ,..,_.. a:uffY: flOl2 SOUIM Ot'20"30" WST. ffl.� ,m MtJNC TH[ W(5J UNIE Of SM> I.Dr l 10 'THE � 00AJElt THDll'Or. 1MDK:£ Sl0tmt 9"11"51 • O&T. 111.U m;T' M.0NO "RiE swnt UN[ OF � I.DI' TD A &11• 1111N 81NilPED "'Snw'TtJN• IWl!OftO -nc 1C1UM11Sr a:weo or SiNO LDT 2,; lt4ENIX SCJtnM GY04"35" DrST", z1e.u ,ur � TME IDllnCRLT � OF THE f'AST IJNt OF MO SNCln fUT lO A 511"' RIIWI SrolMPl:D � ON 11« waTOl,.Y .CHT 01 -, Of IT'Alt R10t.nt 112;; lNDC:l �T M.ONQ MD IIICfff at W M f'OLlDWWC FM CXQmS: lle«:I: 1lllfflt Wt4°H•, a,o,70 F1Er. nDa: sum. s.J'OI'»• IIIEST, 120..D ral; TMENCI. 'SOU1H !lol"ll'llt• WE:ST, ICIICl'.4O rttl; fflEJG. 5a/1M 21r4r� WIST, I0.27 Fm; THOU S0Ul1't !!Kl"M'22"' WEST', II.JI FUT TO A PCaCf OI NDN-TANCIJrff CUM CIWTMt:JCJlmGLTMilff Of'lllrf'Drco.nn-snnT:; ('nC u»GC..._,Ol'IIIJ CUIW°IEM!!li NDlm4 M'W:t•· mr. 114.44 n;EI) THo«::E WD1UI.Y, , ... 40 nl'T MDtC 1NO .aGlff Of'._ ON fl4£ Alie c.- MIO C1A1M. T'9DD4 A CE«M. .-u. °" ar,nr: 11811% 1G1Ttt ws,·,r 111ST. 1n.54 fEEI' AL.DIGS-, IIIIOff Of� n«JU" NCll11I U.-41• WT, 5U.s.> RD; lMDG'. N0IIITH DCTlt'.X,OSl, 10::n.to Fm TD THE TIU: PDl"1 CF IIIQtnl..,_
CCNfAINIC 22.n '°'6, lll0fl[ OR Las.
AUDITOR'S CER1'1f1CATE
Fl.ED FOR � lHt! _ CWr OI ______ 20__ AT -----.M,
.. IIOUlloE --or SUNtr!i. Ill HG[ --AT TH[ RIDUESr' or fllOGOS SUIIIVtTINQ.
,_ COUNTY"""'1'0R AtllntR'S FIL NUURER
""" NON£
QJll<f at'{ [&��ROGERS BARRIS UVJNG TRUST
OMr a WGCJt PI.Sf3D440 ""--D �,;-:::· -BOUNOARY LINE Af>JUSTMENT
'\: ,,,,,,,,,. (doe) 7�1.fl PORTION OF SEC. 18, T9N.. R29E
,U.• , ... i,_ Oi\Tt - .. wt:c CNII APPMMXI °"" M1't 10 • -
_.,. -� ,._ 200' .• f'. I. NO. ... AC40 \GI -2011 ru: 31411
...
31411 Js,,m
or Page 42 of 78
Affidavit of Signature for
Annexation Notice of Intent and Petition
Under the penalty of perjury, I declare under oath, that I am authorized to sign deeds and
encumbrances on behalf of .SC. /.),� o ,,:i-<- ,.. t, e � l l c__ and I am further
authorized to sign other documents including Notices of Intent and Petitions.
Signature
State of Washington
County of ·{7:, c ,,...\c, ·"
)
): ss.
)
Date
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that £01:c.r ��c.1."-..._ \\. is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowledged that�o/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that
((h�she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as 'if<e ____________ of _____________ to be the free and voluntary act
of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Given under my hand and official seal this 7. �:..
..-day of Jc., nv,, �:c�,
/] �..
•2020
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
Residing at: _9.,...;, �:;..' ....._· "�· ________ _ My Commission Expires: , , .. '2 <, • ·z I.)
Page 43 of 78
1.Please print your name in addition to signing.
PRINT NAME SIGNATURE ADDRESS DATE
Page 44 of 78
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 19, 2022
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 1/24/22
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution - Interlocal Agreement for Columbia River Bacteria
Management Plan
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Interlocal Agreement (ILA)
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
ILA Total Cost for RH2 Contract: $78,438
Pasco, Richland & Kennewick's share: $22,411 (each)
West Richland's share: $11,205
Due to West Richland not having a water treatment plant, and a wholesale
water customer of Richland, they would not be responsible to pay a full share
as the other Cities. They will be paying a half share of this agreement.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Richland, Kennewick, Pasco, and West Richland were granted Washington
State Surface Water Right Permit S4-30976 on September 15, 2003 (hereinafter
“Permit” or “Quad-City Water Right”). The Cities use the Permit and other water
rights to access the Columbia River for potable water supply. Richland,
Kennewick, and Pasco withdraw, treat, and deliver Columbia River water to their
residents. West Richland purchases treated water provided by Richland for a
substantial portion of its potable water supply.
In 2021, harmful algal blooms were detected and monitored in the Columbia
River. Harmful algal blooms may release toxins that pose a risk to human health.
Page 45 of 78
Harmful algal blooms and their associated toxins are an emerging risk to water
utilities across the United States, but at present are not regulated by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or the Washington State
Department of Health (DOH). It is prudent for a ll four jurisdictions to prepare
plans to monitor and respond to the possible impairment of our potable water
supplies by a harmful algal bloom.
The City of Richland retained RH2 Engineering, Inc., (RH2) to assist in the
preparation of an Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan (Plan) for the
Quad Cities. The plan will follow the guidance of DOH’s 331-654, entitled Dealing
with Algal Blooms: Time to Make a Plan, and modeled after the Cyanotoxin
Monitoring Plan developed by Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB).
V. DISCUSSION:
Since the proposed management and response plan is important to all four
Cities, staff recommends the execution of the ILA between the Cities of
Kennewick, Richland, Pasco, and West Richland. This will allow the sharing of
cost for the development of a Regional Algal Bloom Management and Response
Plan.
Page 46 of 78
Resolution - Quad Cities ILA –Regional Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT (ILA) WITH THE CITIES OF KENNEWICK, RICHLAND, AND
WEST RICHLAND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A REGIONAL ALGAL
BLOOM MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City together with Richland, Kennewick and West Richland were granted
Washington State Surface Water Right Permit S4-30976 on September 15, 2003 (herein after
“Permit”); and
WHEREAS, the Parties use the Permit and other water rights to access the Columbia River
for potable water supply. Richland, Kennewick and Pasco withdraw, treat, and deliver Columbia
River water to their residents. West Richland purchases treated water provided by Richland for a
substantial portion of its potable water supply; and
WHEREAS, in 2021 harmful algal blooms were detected and monitored in the Columbia
River; and
WHEREAS, harmful algal blooms may release toxins that pose a risk to human health;
and
WHEREAS, harmful algal blooms and their associated toxins are an emerging risk to
water utilities across the United States, but at present are not regulated by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency or the Washington State Department of Health; and
WHEREAS, it is prudent for the Parties to prepare plans to monitor and respond to the
possible impairment of their potable water supplies by a harmful algal bloom; and
WHEREAS, staff in Richland selected an engineering consultant and to negotiate a scope
of work and budget for this work; and
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Cooperation Act contained in RCW 39.34 authorizes local
governments such as the Parties to this Interlocal to contract for the joint conduct of activities
which each of the Parties is individually authorized to perform.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
Section 1. The purpose of this Interlocal Cooperation Agreement is to authorize a
collaborative effort between the Parties to prepare a Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan,
as described within Exhibit A attached hereto.
Section 2. The City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized,
empowered, and directed to execute said ILA on behalf of the City of Pasco.
Page 47 of 78
Resolution - Quad Cities ILA –Regional Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of ___, 2022.
_____________________________
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ _____________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 48 of 78
1
1/12/2022 1:53:17 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\RIC\00-BUSDEV\2022 ALGAL BLOOM MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE PLAN\CONTRACT\PSA_SOW_ALGAL BLOOM
RESPONSE PLAN.DOCX
EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work
City of Richland
Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan
January 2022
Background
The City of Richland (City) retained RH2 Engineering, Inc., (RH2) to assist in the preparation of an
Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan (Plan) for the Quad Cities (Richland, West Richland,
Pasco and Kennewick, hereinafter “Cities”) following the guidance of DOH’s 331-654 Dealing with
Algal Blooms: Time to Make a Plan and modeled after the Cyanotoxin Monitoring Plan developed by
Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB).
As part of the plan, the City would like RH2 to develop background materials that summarize what is
known about cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in the vicinity, how it impacts the vulnerability of the
drinking water supplies for the four water purveyors and to document what is being done to monitor
and predict algal blooms this upcoming season. The Washington State Department of Health (DOH)
is preparing to do a baseline study in 2022 that includes monitoring raw water supplies at the
Richland Intake for temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, nutrients, chlorophyll, and phycocyanin.
Benton-Franklin Health District (BFHD) will use an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
laboratory procedure to test for microcystins and anatoxin-a. Testing will be done every two weeks
and the Cities participants will collect the samples, deliver them to BFHD and pay for the laboratory
efforts.
The plan will also include a raw and finished water monitoring plan at the intakes and water
treatment plants at Richland, Pasco, and Kennewick that describes sampling procedures, establishes
a sampling schedule, identifies laboratories available, and describes how to use Hazen -Adams
CyanoTOX spreadsheets to manage the bacteria and toxi ns present. DOH plans to obtain funding to
support ELISA testing at King County in the event of a bloom and when the purveyors will need to
operate and respond to the vulnerability depending upon the level of risk.
The plan will also include a crisis communications and a joint and cooperative operational strategy
for the Quad Cities that aligns with the health advisory level identified.
Project Assumptions
The following is a list of assumptions used in preparing this Scope of Work:
• Cities and Agency reviews will be performed and document requests fulfilled in a timely
fashion. RH2 is not responsible for delays attributed to the performance of others.
• RH2 will perform the services outlined in this Scope of Work to the level of effort identified in
the accompanying Fee Estimate.
• Project submittals, contract documents, invoices, and materials will be transmitted between
the project team and the City via email.
Page 49 of 78
City of Richland Exhibit A
Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan Scope of Work
2
1/12/2022 1:53:17 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\RIC\00-BUSDEV\2022 ALGAL BLOOM MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE PLAN\CONTRACT\PSA_SOW_ALGAL BLOOM
RESPONSE PLAN.DOCX
• All RH2 deliverables will be provided to the Cities in electronic PDF.
• Meetings are assumed to be virtual via Microsoft Teams.
Task 1 – Project Management
Objective: Manage the RH2 project team, files, and records. Monitor the Scope of Work, schedule,
and budget. Prepare and provide monthly invoices with progress reports documenting work
completed. Communicate project progress with the City.
Approach:
Provide direction, coordination, and oversight to the RH2 project team.
Document and retain information generated during the execution of the project.
Prepare monthly invoices and budget status summaries.
RH2 Deliverables:
• Schedule, scope, and budget administration and management.
• Project team and resource management.
• Monthly invoices with progress reporting (electronic copies via email).
• Communication with the City.
Task 2 – Prepare Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan
Objective: Prepare a management and response plan to mitigate bacteria and toxins in the City’s
source water to better protect City supplies.
Approach:
Attend a kickoff meeting with the Cities to review the history of the cyanobacteria detections
in 2021, the impact on operations, and current treatment response. Kickoff meeting will
establish points of contact for each of the Cities for both review and data collection purposes.
Prepare background materials on cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins in Columbia River waters.
Describe the Health Advisory Levels (HAL) at which customers will be at risk and actions will be
required in response to bacteria and toxins being present and match up with other Level 1
through Level 4 emergencies per the Washington State Department of Health (DOH) guidelines.
Describe the vulnerability of the Cities water supplies to cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins and the
water quality parameters that may indicate conditions suitable for algal blooms.
Review the six existing treatment processes at Richland (2), Pasco (2), and Kennewick (2)
vulnerable to cyanobacteria and describe the strengths and weaknesses of each treatment
plant for removing or eliminating cyanobacteria, algae, and cyanotoxins, and identify treatment
adjustments in the event of a bloom.
Page 50 of 78
City of Richland Exhibit A
Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan Scope of Work
3
1/12/2022 1:53:17 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\RIC\00-BUSDEV\2022 ALGAL BLOOM MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE PLAN\CONTRACT\PSA_SOW_ALGAL BLOOM
RESPONSE PLAN.DOCX
Describe potential capital improvements needed to optimize existing tre atment and identify
additional needs.
Meet with Cities to review and discuss the draft treatment response plan . Review Cities
comments and finalize the treatment response plan.
Document the current multi-jurisdictional efforts and pilot studies being planned for source
water observation and monitoring. Identify holes in the pilot study that are recommended by
DOH’s 331-654 Dealing with Algal Blooms: Time to Make a Plan, but are not currently being
planned for implementation. Prepare a Cities-based supplement source water observations and
monitoring plan.
Prepare a raw and finished water monitoring plan at the intakes and water treatment plants
that describes sampling procedures, establishes a sampling schedule, identifies laboratories
available, and describes how to use Hazen-Adams CyanoTOX spreadsheets to manage the
bacteria and toxins present.
Meet with Cities staff to review and discuss the monitoring plans. Review Cities comments and
finalize the monitoring plans.
Prepare HAL-based public notice templates to use for customer communications. Meet with
Cities staff to develop a draft communications plan for crisis management if a “do not drink”
health advisory is required. Coordinate the management and communications plan s with the
other Cities approach to emergency response in order to provide coordinated responses to the
public. Finalize plan based upon Cities comments.
Compile a final Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan. Append the Plan with contact
lists, references, resources, and sampling and handling procedures.
Assumptions:
• The Plan will be modeled after Eugene Water and Electric Board’s (EWEB) Cyanotoxin
Monitoring Plan, which will be modified to be in compliance with DOH 331-654.
• A kickoff and up to three review meetings with the Cities are planned. Agendas and minutes
will be prepared and distributed electronically by RH2.
Provided by Cities:
• Description, list, or block diagram of existing water treatment processes.
• As-built drawings of the treatment facilities site plan and mechanical layout.
• List of monitoring locations for cyanobacteria bloom indicators.
• EWEB Cyanotoxin Monitoring Plan. (Provided)
RH2 Deliverables:
• Draft treatment response plan with final included in overall Plan.
Page 51 of 78
City of Richland Exhibit A
Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan Scope of Work
4
1/12/2022 1:53:17 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\PROJECTS\PROJECT\DATA\RIC\00-BUSDEV\2022 ALGAL BLOOM MANAGEMENT AND RESPONSE PLAN\CONTRACT\PSA_SOW_ALGAL BLOOM
RESPONSE PLAN.DOCX
• Draft Cities-based supplement source water observations and monitoring plan with final
included in overall Plan.
• Draft raw and finished water monitoring plan with final included in overall Plan.
• HAL-based public notices to use for customer communications in Word format for copying
onto Cities letterheads.
• Draft communications plan with final included in overall Plan.
• Draft and final Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan.
Schedule
It is anticipated that Task 2 will begin within two (2) weeks of a signed authorization and will require
up to eight (8) weeks to complete a draft plan with an additional six (6) weeks to finalize the plan
once Cities comments have been received.
Page 52 of 78
EXHIBIT B
Fee Estimate
City of Richland
Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan
Jan-22
Description Total
Hours Total Labor Total Expense Total Cost
Classification
Task 1 Project Management 36 7,586$ 343$ 7,929$
Task 2 Prepare Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan 360 66,390$ 4,119$ 70,509$
PROJECT TOTAL 396 73,976$ 4,462$ 78,438$
\\corp.rh2.com\projects\Project\Data\RIC\00-BusDev\2022 Algal Bloom Management and Response Plan\Contract\PSA_FEE_Algal Bloom Response Plan 1/12/2022 1:55 PMPage 53 of 78
RATE LIST RATE UNIT
Professional I $153 $/hr
Professional II $166 $/hr
Professional III $182 $/hr
Professional IV $198 $/hr
Professional V $210 $/hr
Professional VI $227 $/hr
Professional VII $241 $/hr
Professional VIII $252 $/hr
Professional IX $252 $/hr
Control Specialist I $138 $/hr
Control Specialist II $149 $/hr
Control Specialist III $164 $/hr
Control Specialist IV $180 $/hr
Control Specialist V $190 $/hr
Control Specialist VI $205 $/hr
Control Specialist VII $218 $/hr
Control Specialist VIII $229 $/hr
Technician I $114 $/hr
Technician II $126 $/hr
Technician III $144 $/hr
Technician IV $155 $/hr
Technician V $168 $/hr
Technician VI $184 $/hr
Technician VII $200 $/hr
Technician VIII $209 $/hr
Administrative I $76 $/hr
Administrative II $89 $/hr
Administrative III $105 $/hr
Administrative IV $126 $/hr
Administrative V $147 $/hr
CAD/GIS System $27.50 $/hr
CAD Plots - Half Size $2.50 price per plot
CAD Plots - Full Size $10.00 price per plot
CAD Plots - Large $25.00 price per plot
Copies (bw) 8.5" X 11"$0.09 price per copy
Copies (bw) 8.5" X 14"$0.14 price per copy
Copies (bw) 11" X 17"$0.20 price per copy
Copies (color) 8.5" X 11"$0.90 price per copy
Copies (color) 8.5" X 14"$1.20 price per copy
Copies (color) 11" X 17"$2.00 price per copy
Technology Charge 2.50%% of Direct Labor
Mileage $0.560
price per mile
(or Current IRS Rate)
Subconsultants 15%Cost +
Outside Services at cost
EXHIBIT C
RH2 ENGINEERING, INC.
2022 SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES
Rates listed are adjusted annually. Page 54 of 78
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 14, 2022
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 1/24/22
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution - Bid Award for West Pasco Water Treatment Plant
Improvements (Phase 1)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Vicinity Map
Recommendation of Award and Bid Tabulations
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Contract Total $8,411,830.20
Funded through Drinking Water State Revolving Fund low-interest loan in the
amount of $5M (2021 award by Department of Health) and local funds (water
rates/ARPA FUNDS).
Construction costs are higher than estimated at the time the 2022 budget was
developed, which impacts the planned project budget. Budget authorization is
on the fund level, so a budget amendment is not required, however staff will
need to coordinate closely on cash flow and funding availability to support
completion of this critical project and others relying on the same fund.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Design, permitting, and final costs estimates for this project were completed in
late 2021. Phase 1 project consists of the first set of improvements to expand
the production capacity of the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant (WPWTP)
from 6 million gallons per day (MGD) to a 12 MGD, through the installation of
membrane treatment units and ancillary equipment, installation of a new process
Page 55 of 78
residuals system involving a clarifier and new residuals pump station building,
SCADA system upgrades, and other plant improvements.
A Phase 2 project for this facility is currently under design and expected to be
bid later in 2022.
The improvements at this facility provide cost effective resiliency for the City’s
water system as the main water treatment facility (Butterfield WTP) is aging and
will be undergoing planned and extensive improvements in the coming years.
Increasing treatment capacity at WPWTP provides for additional supply to meet
our current and future potable water demands, as well as provide much needed
supply redundancy for existing water customers. With the planned
improvements to the Butterfield plant on the near-horizon, there is some urgency
for completion the Phase I and II improvements.
V. DISCUSSION:
The project was advertised for bids on November 8, 2021. On January 13, 2022
bids were publicly opened. A total of four (4) bids were received.
The lowest responsible, responsive bidder is Apollo, Inc. of Pasco, WA in the
amount of $8,411,830.20. The recent Engineer's Estimate is $8,382,834.00. The
bid is just $30K (equivalent to 0.35%) above the Engineer’s Estimate.
The Engineer of Record, RH2, and City staff completed the review of the bid
submittal and found no exemptions or irregularities.
Staff recommends award of the contract to Apollo, Inc. of Pasco, WA.
Page 56 of 78
Resolution – Bid Award for the WPWTP Improvements, Phase 1 project - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, AWARDING BID NO. 16008 FOR THE WEST PASCO
WATER TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1 PROJECT TO
APOLLO, INC. OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AND FURTHER, AUTHORIZE
THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND
ALLOWING ALL NECESSARY BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has an identified capital improvement public works project
described as the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant (WPWTP) Improvements, Phase 1 project;
and
WHEREAS, this project involves installation of membrane treatment units and ancillary
equipment to expand treatment plant capacity from 6 MGD to 12 MGD, installation of a new
process residuals system involving a clarifier and new residuals pump station building, SCADA
system upgrades, and other plant improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City solicited sealed public bids for this project, identified as the WPWTP
Improvements, Phase 1 project; and
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2022 at 2:00 p.m., Four (4) bids were received and opened by
the City; and
WHEREAS, the lowest responsive bidder was Apollo, Inc. with a Bid of $8,411,830.20,
the Engineer’s Estimate was $8,382,834.00; and
WHEREAS, the bid documentation was reviewed and the bidder was determined to be
responsible and responsive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City hereby awards the WPWTP Improvements, Phase 1 project to Apollo, Inc.
of Pasco, Washington in the amount of $8,411,830.20, including Washington State Sales Tax; and
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force
immediately upon passage by the City Council.
Page 57 of 78
Resolution – Bid Award for the WPWTP Improvements, Phase 1 project - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of February,
2022.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 58 of 78
______________
______
,________________
______%
Contractor:
Apollo,Inc.
Unit Price
(D-'U5r'UI-in-(D-‘U5-‘(h-1/Fin-‘(Iii/?ih-{D-(D-‘U3-(D-(/11/ii/1
581,000.00
10,000.00
632,700.00
539,000.00
105,000.00
222,000.00
310,000.00298,000.00112,000.001,950,000.00725,000.00538,000.00406,000.00407,000.00418,000.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.00
Total Amount
'(h-'U}‘U¥'U¥'(D-U$'U¥'U}1D-i.D-'LI>'U}(h'U¥'U¥'(I}£/>1/}(h-
581,000.00
10,000.00
532,700.00
539,000.00
105,000.00
222,000.00
310,000.00293,000.00112,000.001,950,000.00725,000.00538,000.00406,000.00407,000.00418,000.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.00
Bid Tabulations -West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Improvements,Phase 1Project#16-008BidDate:January 13,2022ItemNo.Description1Mobilization2TrenchSafetyandShoring3SiteWork4SiteUtilities5Structura|—WPWTP Hoist and Access Systems6Structura|—Equalization and Flocculation Basin7Structural-Clarifier8Structura|—Process Residuals Pump Station9Finishes10Mechanical-WPWTP Chemical System Upgrades11Mechanical-Pall Water Membrane System Package12Mechanica|—WTWTP Improvements13Mechanical-EQ Basin,Clarifier,and Appurtenances14Mechanica|—Process Residuals Pump Station15Electrical16TelemetryandAutomaticControl17ConstructionRecordsandO&M Manuals18Testing,Startup,and Training19MinorChange Quant Unit1
l—‘l—‘l--‘l-‘l—‘I—‘l—‘l-‘|—‘l-‘l-‘I-‘I-‘l—‘l—‘l—‘l—‘l-‘
Competitive bids were opened on January 13,2022.All bids have
been reviewed by this office,and all unbalanced bids checked.
Date Project Manager
LSLSLSLSLSLSLSLSLSLSLSL5L5LSLSLSLSLSLS Engineer's EstimateUnitPrice$505,000.00$14,000.00$391,000.00$550,000.00$136,000.00$175,000.00$505,000.00$627,000.00$58,000.00$38,000.00$1,950,000.00$640,000.00$417,000.00$436,000.00$915,000.00$232,000.00$10,000.00$20,000.00$50,000.00Subtotal:
'(D-i/¥i/¥'U¥'(D-'U¥iD-{D-(n.'U)-'U){l¥(/¥1/1-'U1-(h-in-U)-{n-
Total Amount505,000.0014,000.00391,000.00550,000.00136,000.00175,000.00505,000.00627,000.0058,000.0038,000.001,950,000.00640,000.00417,000.00436,000.00915,000.00282,000.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.00S7,719,000.00Subtotal:S
WA St Sales Tax (8.6%):S
TOTAL:S 8,382,834.00
7,719,000.00
663,834.00
Contractor:StriderConstructionCo,IncUnitPrice5
'U¥.'(h-'U¥{h-'(D-1h-£h'U3-'U¥'(l3-ih-(I}(hin-{D-'U3-'U1i?-
S7,745,700.00S7,745,700.00
S666,130.20
S8,411,830.20
800,000.0040,000.00200,000.00650,000.00170,000.00260,000.00615,000.00450,000.00215,000.00140,000.001,950,000.00750,000.00650,000.00350,000.00375,000.00450,000.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.00
‘(D-‘U!mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
TotalAmount800,000.0040,000.00200,000.00650,000.00170,000.00260,000.00615,000.00450,000.00215,000.00140,000.001,950,000.00750,000.00650,000.00350,000.00375,000.00450,000.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.008,145,000.008,145,000.00
700,470.00
8,845,470.00
Contractor.McClure&Sons,IncUnitPrice
'U5-{D-(h-£h'£D-1/¥'U¥{D-iD-£h1n-'U)-'U¥'£h'U¥'U)£D1?-ih-
475,000.0025,000.00750,000.00925,000.0050,000.00125,000.00360,000.00600,000.00200,000.00225,000.001,950,000.00920,000.00700,000.00540,000.00440,500.00380,000.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.00TotalAmount
‘U!-‘U5 (h-1/?iD-'U)-(h-'U1i?-'U3-1D-(?-UT(hih'U¥{?-iD-(D-i/¥'(D-(D-
475,000.0025,000.00750,000.00925,000.0050,000.00125,000.00360,000.00600,000.00200,000.00225,000.001,950,000.00920,000.00700,000.00540,000.00440,500.00380,000.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.008,745,500.008,745,500.00
752,113.00
9,497,613.00
Contractor:UnitPrice5
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
641,453.003,900.00574,900.001,794,900.00253,900.00207,300.00396,700.00549,500.00262,500.00127,000.001,950,000.00268,732.00495,300.00356,900.00376,500.00491,521.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.00
mm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
ClearwaterConst&Mgmt,LLCTotalAmount641,453.003,900.00574,900.001,794,900.00253,900.00207,300.00396,700.00549,500.00262,500.00127,000.001,950,000.00268,732.00495,300.00356,900.00376,500.00491,521.0010,000.0020,000.0050,000.008,831,006.008,831,006.00
759,466.52
9,590,472.52Page 59 of 78
RH2 ENGINEERING
Richland
114 Columbia Point Drive, Suite C
Richland, WA 99352
1.800.720.8052 / rh2.com
01/19/22 9:02 AM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\20-0062\50 SDB\RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD - WPWTP
IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX
WASHINGTON
LOCATIONS
Bellingham
Bothell (Corporate)
East Wenatchee
Issaquah
Richland
Tacoma
OREGON
LOCATIONS
Medford
Portland
IDAHO
LOCATIONS
Meridian
January 19, 2022
Ms. Maria Serra
City of Pasco
525 N. Third Avenue
Second Floor
Pasco, WA 99301
Sent via: Email
Subject: Recommendation of Bid Award
West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Phase 1 Improvements
Dear Ms. Serra:
The bids for the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Phase 1 Improvements
project were opened at the City of Pasco City Hall on January 13, 2022, at
2:00 p.m. Of the four (4) bids received, Apollo, Inc., (Apollo) submitted the
lowest bid.
The bids for this project are as follows, and a complete tabulation of the bids is
attached for your records.
Apollo, Inc. $8,411,830
Strider Construction $8,845,470
McClure & Sons, Inc. $9,497,613
Clearwater Construction $9,590,473
Engineer’s Estimate $8,383,000
RH2 Engineering, Inc., (RH2) reviewed the bid proposals and compiled the bid
tabulation. RH2 confirmed that the documentation submitted by Apollo is
responsive and in accordance with the bid specifications. Based on this review,
RH2 recommends that Apollo be awarded the contract for this project.
If you have any questions regarding this recommendation, please feel free to
contact me at (425) 951-5456.
Page 60 of 78
01/19/22 9:02 AM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\20-0062\50 SDB\RECOMMENDATION OF AWARD - WPWTP IMPROVEMENTS.DOCX
MS. SERRA
January 19, 2022
Page 2
Sincerely,
Barney Santiago, PE
Project Engineer
BS/fs
Attachments: Bid Tabulation
Page 61 of 78
City of PascoWest Pasco Water Treatment Plant ImprovementsBid TabulationRH2 Engineering, Inc.RH2 Project Number: 20-0062Bid Opening 1/13/2022 at 2:00 PMItem DescriptionQuantityUnit Unit PriceTotalUnit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total Unit Price Total1Mobilization1LS$505,000.00$505,000.00581,000.00$ 581,000.00$ 800,000.00$ 800,000.00$ 475,000.00$ 475,000.00$ 641,453.00$ 641,453.00$ 2Trench Safety and Shoring1LS$14,000.00$14,000.0010,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 40,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 3,900.00$ 3,900.00$ 3Site Work1LS$391,000.00$391,000.00632,700.00$ 632,700.00$ 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 750,000.00$ 750,000.00$ 574,900.00$ 574,900.00$ 4Site Utilities1LS$550,000.00$550,000.00539,000.00$ 539,000.00$ 650,000.00$ 650,000.00$ 925,000.00$ 925,000.00$ 1,794,900.00$ 1,794,900.00$ 5Structural - WPWTP Hoist and Access Systems1LS$136,000.00$136,000.00105,000.00$ 105,000.00$ 170,000.00$ 170,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 253,900.00$ 253,900.00$ 6Structural - Equalization and Flocculation Basin1LS$175,000.00$175,000.00222,000.00$ 222,000.00$ 260,000.00$ 260,000.00$ 125,000.00$ 125,000.00$ 207,300.00$ 207,300.00$ 7Structural - Clarifier1LS$505,000.00$505,000.00412,000.00$ 412,000.00$ 615,000.00$ 615,000.00$ 360,000.00$ 360,000.00$ 396,700.00$ 396,700.00$ 8Structural - Process Residuals Pump Station1LS$627,000.00$627,000.00310,000.00$ 310,000.00$ 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ 600,000.00$ 600,000.00$ 549,500.00$ 549,500.00$ 9Finishes1LS$58,000.00$58,000.00298,000.00$ 298,000.00$ 215,000.00$ 215,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 200,000.00$ 262,500.00$ 262,500.00$ 10Mechanical - WPWTP Chemical System Upgrades1LS$38,000.00$38,000.00112,000.00$ 112,000.00$ 140,000.00$ 140,000.00$ 225,000.00$ 225,000.00$ 127,000.00$ 127,000.00$ 11Mechanical - Pall Water Membrane System Package1LS$1,950,000.00$1,950,000.00$1,950,000.001,950,000.00$ $1,950,000.001,950,000.00$ $1,950,000.001,950,000.00$ $1,950,000.001,950,000.00$ 12Mechanical - WPWTP Improvements1LS$640,000.00$640,000.00725,000.00$ 725,000.00$ 750,000.00$ 750,000.00$ 920,000.00$ 920,000.00$ 268,732.00$ 268,732.00$ 13Mechanical - EQ Basin, Clarifier, and Appurtenances1LS$417,000.00$417,000.00538,000.00$ 538,000.00$ 650,000.00$ 650,000.00$ 700,000.00$ 700,000.00$ 495,300.00$ 495,300.00$ 14Mechanical - Process Residuals Pump Station1LS$436,000.00$436,000.00406,000.00$ 406,000.00$ 350,000.00$ 350,000.00$ 540,000.00$ 540,000.00$ 356,900.00$ 356,900.00$ 15Electrical1LS$915,000.00$915,000.00407,000.00$ 407,000.00$ 375,000.00$ 375,000.00$ 440,500.00$ 440,500.00$ 376,500.00$ 376,500.00$ 16Telemetry and Automatic Control1LS$282,000.00$282,000.00418,000.00$ 418,000.00$ 450,000.00$ 450,000.00$ 380,000.00$ 380,000.00$ 491,521.00$ 491,521.00$ 17Construction Records and O&M Manuals1LS$10,000.00$10,000.00$10,000.0010,000.00$ $10,000.0010,000.00$ $10,000.0010,000.00$ $10,000.0010,000.00$ 18Testing, Startup, and Training1LS$20,000.00$20,000.00$20,000.0020,000.00$ $20,000.0020,000.00$ $20,000.0020,000.00$ $20,000.0020,000.00$ 19Minor Change1LS$50,000.00$50,000.00$50,000.0050,000.00$ $50,000.0050,000.00$ $50,000.0050,000.00$ $50,000.0050,000.00$ Subtotal Cost$7,719,000 $7,745,700 $8,145,000 $8,745,500 $8,831,0068.6%$663,900.00$666,130.20$700,470.00$752,113.00$759,466.52$8,383,000.00$8,411,830.20$8,845,470.00$9,497,613.00$9,590,472.52McClure & Sons Clearwater ConstructionSales TaxWTP Improvements Total Construction CostEngineer's Estimate Apollo Strider ConstructionJ:\Data\PSC\20-0062\50 SDB\Bids\WPWTP Improvements Bid Tab.xlsx : SummaryPage 1 of 1Page 62 of 78
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 1/24/22
FROM: Eric Ferguson, City Attorney
Executive
SUBJECT: Council Voting Districts - Redistricting Discussion
I. REFERENCE(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
May 8, 2017, was the most recent revisions to the City of Pasco's Council Voting
Districts and were instituted after Judge Suko approved the motion to revise the
City's Council District Boundary Map based on an ACLU law suit.
The U.S. Census completed the 10-year census in 2020 and in August of 2021
released key census information to Washington State Office of Financial
Management who in turn provided information to the State's Counties and
Municipalities.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff will provide a brief history and status report of the redistricting of the City of
Pasco's Council Voting Districts and a timeline for the current redistricting effort.
Page 63 of 78
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 20, 2022
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 1/24/22
FROM: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: Local Finance Options - Income Tax
I. REFERENCE(S):
Tax Structure Workgroup Background & Draft Letter
Draft Resolutions
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The issue of a local income tax has been discussed by the City Council in their
previous two meetings. While Councilmembers speaking to the issue have
uniformly indicated they would not favor a locally imposed income tax, the
Council has not been as uniform in how to convey their collective position on the
matter to the public, or even whether further communication on the topic is
necessary. A few differing approaches have been proposed by Councilmembers
as to how the Council may express their sentiments on the matter of local tax
policy, in particular the imposition of a local income tax:
• Passage of a resolution affirming that the City Council has no intention of
imposing a local income tax.
• Passage of an ordinance prohibiting the imposition of a local income tax
by the City of Pasco.
• matter, Interaction with the Washington State Legislature on the
specifically, a higher level of engagement on legislation relating to local
taxing authority proposals.
Page 64 of 78
Following discussion on the matter at the January 18 regular meeting, staff
conferred with the City’s governmental liaison, Briahna Murry of Gordon Thomas
Honeywell (GTH). Ms. Murray advised that as the committee meeting for the
specific is 5554, meeting, 18th SB the at discussed legislation January
scheduled for a January 20th hearing before the Senate Committee on Housing
& Local Government, prior the Council's next opportunity to discuss this bill and
formulate a position, there is no opportunity for timely testimony, unless the bill
were to move forward. Ms. Murray suggested that local options to solve local
issues has been something the City has historically advocated for, adding that
fiscal policy is a prominent topic of discussion and legislation during this current
session. To that end, Ms. Murray has provided a draft letter expressing general
sentiments on the topic for Council’s consideration.
Staff and the City Attorney’s office also met to discuss the development of source
documents for Council discussion. As was mentioned by City Attorney Ferguson
at the January 18th meeting, his office had previously developed a resolution
template for other agencies.
As noted above, Council has indicated uniformity in their opposition with respect
to imposition of a local income tax, how best to express this sentiment has been
more difficult to agree upon, the apparent options, in no particular order, being
as follows:
1. No further action – Deem the conversation among Council to date as
sufficient to assure the public that the City Council has no intention of
imposing a local income tax.
2. Passage of a resolution - A resolution stating the Council’s opposition to
a local income tax represents a more formal manner for Council to assure
the public of its intention, however, resolutions lack the force of law,
3. Passage of an ordinance - An ordinance prohibiting a local income tax
would have the force of law, however all a future Council would need do
to enact an income tax is repeal the prohibition by passage of an
ordinance enacting such a tax.
4. Active engagement on fiscal policy matters before the legislature. This
option could be implemented as a singular course of action or accompany
other options.
V. DISCUSSION:
Consistent with the discussion at the January 18 Workshop and to assist in
Council deliberations on the matter, the following source documents have been
provided:
• Draft resolution opposing imposition of a local income tax by the City of
Pasco.
Page 65 of 78
• Draft resolution opposing imposition of a local income tax and directing
staff to prepare on ordinance amending the Pasco Municipal Code to
provide for such a prohibition.
• Draft letter prepared by Ms. Murray, VP GTH, con veying Council
sentiments regarding home rule fiscal policy.
Staff recommends Council discuss the options outlined above, and others that
may arise during discussion, consider the options in light of what Council wishes
to accomplish by further action on this matter, and provide appropriate direction
to staff.
Page 66 of 78
Background
Website: https://taxworkgroup.org/overview
In 2017, the Washington State Legislature established the Tax Structure Work Group (TSWG) to
identify options to make the Washington State tax code more fair, adequate, stable, and
transparent. As of 2019, the TSWG is comprised of bipartisan Washington State legislators, as
well as representatives from the Governor’s Office, the Washington State Department of
Revenue, the Washington State Association of Counties (WSAC), and the Association of
Washington Cities (AWC). The TSWG facilitates public discussions throughout the state about
the advantages and disadvantages of the state's current and potential tax structure to inform
recommendations to improve Washington State’s tax structure to benefit individuals, families,
and businesses in Washington State. The Work Group will develop recommended legislation for
the 2023 Legislature to consider.
Explanatory video.
The TSWG recently completed a series of town hall meetings held virtually throughout the state
and continue to see public input. In the town halls, they explained several different scenarios
that they are considering, as outlined in this PowerPoint. There are two scenarios that include a
personal income tax.
Page 67 of 78
DISCUSSION DRAFT
January X, 2022
Dear Workgroup Members,
As elected leaders for the Pasco community, we wanted to provide you with input on current
and future tax structure of our state and our community. We understand that you are currently
developing recommendations to provide the Legislature on different types of taxes that our
state could be imposed.
It’s our understanding that you are considering many different types of taxes including revising
the state property tax levy limit, a wealth tax, a personal income tax, a value-added tax,
margins tax, and employer compensation tax, and more. We would like to offer our feedback
on just one of these taxes – the income tax and express our strong opposition to it.
We believe that integrating an income tax into Washington State’s tax code, even if it comes
with a reduction to the sales and/or property tax, could reduce our state’s economic
competitiveness.
Additionally, our community has concerns that over time state elected officials would not
return to the familiar, and increase the sales and property tax, offsetting the revenue neutrality
of the scenarios that the Work Group has presented.
We encourage you to continue your work on our state’s tax code and look forward to reviewing
your recommendations.
Page 68 of 78
Resolution – Ban Local Income Tax
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
OPPOSING A LOCAL INCOME TAX ON THE RESIDENTS AND
BUSINESSES OF THE CITY OF PASCO
WHEREAS, Article VII, § 1 of the Washington State Constitution establishes the basic
framework for taxation in the State of Washington, including what shall be permitted as a tax; and
WHEREAS, after the City of Seattle attempted to enact an income tax on certain
individuals applicable within its municipal boundaries, the Washington State Court of Appeals,
Division 1, ruled that such a tax, when selectively applied, was unconstitutional and invalid.
Kunath v. City of Seattle, 10 Wash. App. 2d 205 (Div. 1 2019); and
WHEREAS, certain language in the Kunath ruling has caused discussion in various
committees across Washington as to whether cities have authority to impose a local income tax,
which is legally considered a tax on property; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Supreme Court denied request for appeal of the Kunath
case such that the ruling stands at this time; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wants to declare its opposition regarding a local income tax
on its residents and businesses; and
WHEREAS, businesses large and small, provide the economic lifeblood in our City, the
region, state, and country; and
WHEREAS, the City Council knows that a strong and encouraging business climate and
quality of place are the best ways to attract and retain good businesses to employ people in family
wage jobs; and
WHEREAS, use of a local income tax would most likely result in less long-term revenue
due to the dampening effect it would have on our businesses and local economy.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the imposition of a local income tax on the businesses and residents of the City of
Pasco is opposed. Such a tax would be a direct conflict with the high value the City places on
promoting economic development through the attraction and expansion of financially healthy,
family wage paying employers. Small businesses are the backbone of our local, regional, state,
and national economy and it is imperative that the City not put unnecessary hurdles in the way of
their success. As such, the City of Pasco opposes the imposition of a local income tax in the event
a local income tax is determined legal and permissible by the Washington State Supreme Court or
the Washington State Legislature.
Page 69 of 78
Resolution – Ban Local Income Tax
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ___ day of ________,
2022.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 70 of 78
Resolution – Ban Local Income Tax and Create PMC Chapter - 1
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
OPPOSING A LOCAL INCOME TAX ON THE RESIDENTS AND
BUSINESSES OF THE CITY OF PASCO
WHEREAS, Article VII, § 1 of the Washington State Constitution establishes the basic
framework for taxation in the State of Washington, including what shall be permitted as a tax; and
WHEREAS, after the City of Seattle attempted to enact an income tax on certain
individuals applicable within its municipal boundaries, the Washington State Court of Appeals,
Division 1, ruled that such a tax, when selectively applied, was unconstitutional and invalid.
Kunath v. City of Seattle, 10 Wash. App. 2d 205 (Div. 1 2019); and
WHEREAS, certain language in the Kunath ruling has caused discussion in various
committees across Washington as to whether cities have authority to impose a local income tax,
which is legally considered a tax on property; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Supreme Court denied request for appeal of the Kunath
case such that the ruling stands at this time; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wants to declare its opposition regarding a local income tax
on its residents and businesses; and
WHEREAS, businesses large and small, provide the economic lifeblood in our City, the
region, state, and country; and
WHEREAS, the City Council knows that a strong and encouraging business climate and
quality of place are the best ways to attract and retain good businesses to employ people in family
wage jobs; and
WHEREAS, use of a local income tax would most likely result in less long-term revenue
due to the dampening effect it would have on our businesses and local economy.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the imposition of a local income tax on the businesses and residents of the City of
Pasco is opposed. Such a tax would be a direct conflict with the high value the City places on
promoting economic development through the attraction and expansion of financially healthy,
family wage paying employers. Small businesses are the backbone of our local, regional, state,
and national economy and it is imperative that the City not put unnecessary hurdles in the way of
their success. As such, the City of Pasco opposes the imposition of a local income tax in the event
a local income tax is determined legal and permissible by the Washington State Supreme Court or
the Washington State Legislature.
Page 71 of 78
Resolution – Ban Local Income Tax and Create PMC Chapter - 2
Be It Further Resolved, that Council instructs the City Manager and City Attorney to
prepare an Ordinance amending the Pasco Municipal Code by creating a new Chapter opposing a
local income tax on the residents and businesses of the City of Pasco, Washington.
Be It Further Resolved, that this Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ___ day of ________,
2022.
Blanche Barajas
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 72 of 78
QUALITY OF LIFE
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re-
investment in community infrastructure by:
• Using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and other public and private capital to
revitalize older neighborhoods and safe routes to essential services.
• Continuing efforts toward designing, siting, programming needs, and site selection for a
community center and pursuing acquisition of land for future community park.
• Developing Phase I of the A Street Sporting Complex and continue efforts to provide additional
soccer and sports fields.
• Coordinating with the Pasco Public Facilities District to develop a public education campaign,
financial analysis and prepare a ballot measure concerning the development of a regional aquatic
facility for consideration by the people.
• Completing construction of a new animal control facility.
• Ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and effectiveness of public resources in the delivery of
municipal services, programs, and long-term maintenance and viability of public facilities.
• Collaborating with the Inclusion, Diversity and Equity Commission and community leaders to
enhance engagement efforts and organizational cultural competency.
• Updating design standards for the development of new neighborhoods and re-development to
promote greater neighborhood cohesion through design elements, e.g.: walkability, aesthetics,
sustainability, and community gathering spaces.
• Updating Parks and Facilities Comprehensive Plan to include: public facilities inventory, needs
assessment, level of service, and centers evaluation.
• Teaming with local and regional partners to develop a Housing Action Plan with a focus on strategies
that emphasize affordable housing.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Enhance the long-term financial viability, value, and service levels of services and programs, including:
• Regular evaluation of services and programs to confirm importance to community, adequacy, and
cost-benefit.
• Continuation of cost of service and recovery targets in evaluating City services.
• Ongoing evaluation of costs, processes and performance associated with delivery of City services
including customer feedback and satisfaction, staffing, facilities, and partnership opportunities.
• Instilling and promoting an organizational culture of customer service across all business lines.
• Updating policies relating to urbanization of the unincorporated islands to assure consistency with
long-range planning, community safety, and fiscal sustainability.
City Council Goals 2020-2021
Page 73 of 78
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Preserve past improvements and promote future gains by:
• Developing a Comprehensive Police Strategic Master Plan through a transparent process to evaluate
future service levels of the department to assure sustainability, public safety, and crime control over
the next 5-10 years.
• Collaborating with regional and community partners to evaluate and implement strategies to
reduce the incidence of homelessness.
• Leveraging and expanding partnerships to maintain and enhance behavioral health services to
community members in crisis being assisted by police and fire.
• Continuing efforts to improve police and community relations.
• Working to achieve and maintain target fire response times through operational improvements and
long-range strategic planning of facilities and staffing.
• Focusing on the long-term goal of sustaining a Washington State Rating Bureau Class 3 community
rating.
• Leveraging infrastructure database of sidewalks, streetlights and pavement conditions along with
evaluating policies and methods to address needs and inequities.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Promote a highly-functional multi-modal transportation network through:
• Commencement and completion of construction of the Lewis Street Overpass project.
• Continued emphasis on improvements in Road 68/I-182/Burden Blvd. corridor to improve operation
and safety.
• Data-driven pro-active neighborhood traffic calming efforts.
• Continued collaboration with Ben Franklin Transit to enhance mobility and access.
• Completion of a Transportation System Master Plan and utilization of its recommendations to
develop policies, regulations, programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic
investment, mobility, multi-modal systems, accessibility, efficiency and safety.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Promote and encourage economic vitality by supporting:
• Downtown revitalization efforts of Downtown Pasco Development Authority (DPDA), post-COVID
restart, and City initiatives such as Downtown Master Plan process and sign code modifications.
• The construction of Peanuts Park and Farmers Market and continued efforts to pursue streetscape
and gateway upgrades.
• The completion of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update and Broadmoor Master Plan efforts,
adoption of Urban Growth Area expansion alternative, implementation of adopted long-range
planning efforts with appropriate analysis and adoption of planning actions including: zoning code
changes, phased sign code update, and development regulations and standards.
• Increased efforts to promote the community as a desirable place for commercial and industrial
development by promoting small business outreach and assistance, predictability in project review,
and excellent customer service.
• Partnerships and encouragement of Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to facilitate
development of the remaining state-owned properties at Road 68/I-182.
Page 74 of 78
• Continued coordination with the Port of Pasco to complete and implement a waterfront-zoning
plan and provide for public infrastructure.
• Active partnerships in the planning and development of strategies to promote tourism and
deployment of assets to spur economic activity.
• In concert with community partners, development of a comprehensive economic development
plan.
COMMUNITY IDENTITY
Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion and image through:
• Continued efforts of community surveying through traditional methods and the application of new
technologies.
• Providing opportunities for community engagement through boards, commissions, volunteer
opportunities, social media, forums, and other outlets.
• Enhanced inter-agency and constituent coordination developed during the pandemic.
• Continued efforts of the community identity/image enhancement campaign to include promotion
of community and organizational successes.
• Enhanced participation and support of cultural events occurring within the community.
• Support of the Arts and Culture Commission in promoting unity and the celebration of diversity
through art and culture programs.
For more information, visit www.pasco-wa.gov/councilgoals
Page 75 of 78
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover una vida de buena calidad a través de programas de calidad, servicios e inversiones y
reinversiones adecuadas en la infraestructura de la comunidad al:
• Utilizar una Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (Concesión de Ayuda Federal para el
Desarrollo Comunitario) y otro capital público y privado para renovar las vecindades antiguas y las
rutas seguras a los servicios esenciales.
• Continuar los esfuerzos hacia el diseño, las obras de construcción, las necesidades programáticas, y
la elección de dichas obras de construcción, para un centro comunitario y comprar el terreno para
un futuro parque comunitario.
• Desarrollar la 1era Fase del Sporting Complex (Complejo Deportivo) de la Calle A y continuar los
esfuerzos de proporcionar más campos de fútbol y de otros deportes.
• Coordinar con el Pasco Public Facilities District (Distrito de las Instalaciones Públicas de Pasco) para
desarrollar una campaña de educación pública, un análisis financiero, y preparar una propuesta
sobre el desarrollo de una instalación acuática regional para que sea considerada por el público.
• Terminar la construcción de una nueva instalación para el control de animales.
• Continuar los esfuerzos para mejorar la eficiencia y la eficacia de los recursos públicos en la entrega
de servicios municipales, programas, y el mantenimiento y la viabilidad a largo plazo de
instalaciones públicas.
• Colaborar con la Inclusion, Diversity and Equity Commission (Comisión de Inclusión, Diversidad, y
Equidad) y con los líderes comunitarios para mejorar los esfuerzos de participación y la capacidad
cultural organizacional.
• Actualizar los estándares de diseño para el desarrollo de nuevas vecindades y el redesarrollo para
promover más cohesión de las vecindades a través de elementos de diseño, p. ej.: viabilidad peatonal,
evaluación de las necesidades, sustentabilidad, y lugares donde se puedan reunir los miembros de
la comunidad.
• Actualizar el Parks and Facilities Comprehensive Plan (Plan Comprehensivo de los Parques y las
Instalaciones) para que incluya: un inventario de instalaciones públicas, una evaluación de las
necesidades, el nivel de servicio, y la evaluación del centro.
• Trabajar en equipo con colaboradores regionales para desarrollar un Housing Action Plan (Plan de
Acción para Viviendas) con un enfoque en las estrategias que enfatizan viviendas económicas.
SUSTENTABILIDAD FINANCIERA
Mejorar la sustentabilidad financiera a largo plazo, el valor, y los niveles de servicios y programas,
incluyendo:
• La evaluación regular de los servicios y de los programas para confirmar la importancia de la
comunidad, la capitalización adecuada, y el costo-beneficio.
Metas del Concilio de la
Ciudad del 2020-2021
Page 76 of 78
• La continuación del costo por el servicio y de las metas de recuperación al evaluar los servicios de la
Ciudad.
• La evaluación continua de los costos, los procesos y el desempeño relacionado con la entrega de los
servicios de la Ciudad incluyendo la retroalimentación y la satisfacción del cliente, el personal, las
instalaciones, y las oportunidades colaborativas.
• Inculcar y promover una cultura organizacional de servicio al cliente a lo largo de todas las líneas de
negocio.
• Actualizar las políticas relacionadas con la urbanización de las islas no incorporadas para asegurar
consistencia con la planificación a largo plazo, la seguridad comunitaria, y la sustentabilidad fiscal.
SEGURIDAD COMUNITARIA
Preservar las mejorías anteriores y promover las ganancias futuras al:
• Desarrollar un Comprehensive Police Strategic Master Plan (Plan Maestro Estratégico
Comprehensivo Policial) a través de un proceso transparente para evaluar los niveles futuros de
servicio del departamento para asegurar sustentabilidad, seguridad pública, y control de crímenes
durante los siguientes 5-10 años.
• Trabajar con colaboradores regionales y comunitarios para evaluar e implementar estrategias para
reducir los casos de personas sin techo.
• Hacer uso y ampliar las colaboraciones para mantener y mejorar los servicios de salud conductual a
los miembros de la comunidad que se encuentran en medio de una crisis, ayudados por la policía y
por los bomberos.
• Continuar los esfuerzos para mejorar la relación con la policía y con la comunidad.
• Trabajar para lograr y mantener el tiempo de reacción de los bomberos a través de mejorías
operacionales y la planificación estratégica de instalaciones y personal a largo plazo.
• Enfocarse en la meta a largo plazo de mantener una clasificación de la comunidad Clase 3 del
Washington State Rating Bureau (Departamento de Clasificación del Estado de Washington).
• Utilizar la base de datos de la infraestructura de las banquetas, los faroles, y las condiciones del
pavimento, como también evaluar las políticas y los métodos para tratar las necesidades y las
injusticias.
RED DE TRANSPORTE COMUNITARIO
Promover una red de transporte extremadamente funcional y multimodal a través de:
• El comienzo y el término de la construcción del proyecto Lewis Street Overpass.
• El énfasis continuo en las mejorías de la ruta Road 68/I-182/Burden Blvd. para mejorar la operación y
la seguridad.
• Los esfuerzos proactivos basados en datos para calmar el tráfico en las vecindades.
• La colaboración continua con Ben Franklin Transit para mejorar la movilidad y el acceso.
• El término del Transportation System Master Plan (Plan Maestro del Sistema de Transporte) y la
utilización de sus recomendaciones para desarrollar políticas, reglas, programas, y proyectos que
proporcionan más conectividad, inversiones estratégicas, movilidad, sistemas multimodales,
accesibilidad, eficiencia, y seguridad.
Page 77 of 78
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Promover y motivar la vitalidad económica al apoyar:
• Los esfuerzos de renovación de la Downtown Pasco Development Authority (DPDA) (Autoridad de
Desarrollo del Centro de Pasco), el reinicio después de COVID, y las iniciativas de la Ciudad como el
proceso del Downtown Master Plan (Plan Maestro del Centro) y las modificaciones de los códigos de
anuncios.
• La construcción del Peanuts Park and Farmers Market (Parque Peanuts y el Mercado) y los esfuerzos
continuos para discutir paisajes urbanos y actualizaciones de entradas.
• El término de los esfuerzos de la Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update (Actualización
Comprehensiva del Uso de Terrenos) y los esfuerzos del Broadmoor Master Plan (Plan Maestro de
Broadmoor), la adopción de la alternativa de la expansión de Urban Growth Area (Área del
Crecimiento Urbano), la implementación de los esfuerzos de planificación a largo plazo con los
análisis adecuados y la adopción de acciones de planificación incluyendo: los cambios a los códigos
de zonas, la actualización de los códigos de los anuncios de las fases, y el desarrollo de las reglas y los
estándares.
• Más esfuerzos para promover a la comunidad como un lugar atractivo para el desarrollo comercial
e industrial al fomentar el alcance y la ayuda a los negocios pequeños, la predictibilidad en la
revisión de proyectos, y un excelente servicio al cliente.
• Las colaboraciones y la motivación del Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (Departamento de
Recursos Naturales) para facilitar el desarrollo de las propiedades restantes del estado en Road 68/I-
182.
• La coordinación continua con el Port of Pasco (Puerto de Pasco) para terminar e implementar un
plan de zonas costeras y proporcionar una infraestructura pública.
• Las colaboraciones activas en la planificación y el desarrollo de estrategias para promover el turismo
y la utilización de recursos para estimular actividad económica.
• Junto con los colaboradores de la comunidad, crear un plan comprehensivo de desarrollo
económico.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen a través de:
• Los esfuerzos continuos para evaluar a la comunidad a través de los métodos tradicionales y la
aplicación de nuevas tecnologías.
• Proporcionar oportunidades para la involucración comunitaria a través de mesas directivas,
comisiones, oportunidades para voluntarios, medios sociales, foros, y otros medios.
• Una mejor coordinación entre las agencias y los constituyentes desarrollada durante la pandémica.
• Los esfuerzos continuos de campañas para la mejoría de la identidad/imagen comunitaria que
promuevan a la comunidad y a los éxitos organizacionales.
• Una mejor participación y apoyo de los eventos culturales llevados a cabo dentro de la comunidad.
• El apoyo de la Arts and Culture Commission (Comisión de Artes y Cultura) al promover la unidad y
celebrar la diversidad a través de programas de arte y cultura.
Para más información, visite www.pasco-wa.gov/councilgoals
Page 78 of 78