HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.09.13 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA
City Council Workshop Meeting
7:00 PM - Monday, September 13, 2021
City Council Chambers & GoToWebinar
Page
1. MEETING INSTRUCTIONS for REMOTE ACCESS - The Pasco City Council
Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum
Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive
and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco.
To listen to the meeting via phone, call (213) 929-4212 and use access code
398-399-253.
2. CALL TO ORDER
3. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS
5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
3 - 12 (a) American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds Business Support
Program with Pasco Chamber of Commerce
13 - 15 (b) Life and Safety Program for Commercial Structures
16 - 61 (c) Resolution - I-182/Broadmoor Interchange Improvements – DKS
Associates, Inc. Professional Services Agreement (Design)
62 - 80 (d) Proposed Sewer Local Improvement Districts (LID)s in New Urban
Growth Area
81 - 86 (e) Utility Extension in the Unincorporated Islands & Urban Growth
Area (UGA)
87 - 97 (f) National Community Survey
Page 1 of 128
98 - 111 (g) Resolutions - Wehe Water Main & Wrigley Drive Extension Project
Acceptances
112 - 122 (h) Resolution - Tri-Cities Youth Soccer Association (T-CYSA)
Agreement
6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION
7. EXECUTIVE SESSION
8. ADJOURNMENT
9. ADDITIONAL NOTES
123 - 128 (a) Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only)
(b) REMINDERS
• Friday, September 17, 10:00 AM: Benton-Franklin Council
of Governments Board Meeting – Ben-Franklin Transit,
1000 Columbia Park Trail, Richland (COUNCILMEMBER
RUBEN ALVARADO, Rep., MAYOR PRO TEM BLANCHE
BARAJAS, Alt.)
• Monday, September 20, 6:00 PM: LEOFF Disability Board –
City Hall Conference Room 1, Pasco City Hall (MAYOR
SAUL MARTINEZ, Rep.; MAYOR PRO TEM BLANCHE
BARAJAS, Alt.)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the
Clerk for assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor
avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la
disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be
provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice
to the City Clerk to ensure availability.)
Page 2 of 128
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 9, 2021
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/13/21
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds Business Support Program
with Pasco Chamber of Commerce
I. REFERENCE(S):
Approved ARPA Agreement with the Pasco Chamber of Commerce
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund (ARPA Funds) - $2,500,000 (Additional to previously authorized
$1,000,000)
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan
Act of 2021 (ARPA, HR 1319) to provide federal funding relief for American
workers, families, industries, and state and local governments. The Act provides
over $350 billion to states, counties, tribal governments, territories, and cities,
with a total of $17,464,312 allocated to the City of Pasco in two equal
installments during the calendar years 2021 and 2022.
On July 6, 2021, Council authorized $1,000,000 to create a Business Support
Program to assist small businesses and nonprofit organizations within the City
of Pasco that have suffered negative economic impa cts as a result of the COVID-
19 public health emergency. As Council may recall, the initial $1,000,000
allocation of ARPA funds was intended as a placeholder to provide for the
implementation of the business assistance program. There was an expectation
at the time that demand would be greater, however the City had yet to explore
the opportunity for Franklin County to allocate a portion of the ARPA funds it
Page 3 of 128
received toward this program. Unfortunately, Franklin County has yet initiate the
process of allocating their ARPA funds.
The City of Pasco subsequently contracted with Pasco Chamber of Commerce
(Chamber) to manage this program. The Chamber is providing not only grant
assistance to businesses in need, but will be creating an education program to
assist businesses in critical areas such as accounting, regulatory compliance,
business development, market analysis, and inventory control/organization.
Furthermore, the agreement allowed the Chamber to create a business portal to
provide local businesses with resources, programs, and other benefits.
V. DISCUSSION:
Due to significant effort from the Chamber, City's Economic Development
Manager, word of mouth among community members, as well as the absence
of other programs in the community, demand has been hi gh. As of September
6th, the Chamber has received more than 125 applications, with over $3,000,000
in business grant requests. Upon further review of the documentations provided,
the Chamber was able to substantiate close to $2,000,000 of the requested
amount. The applications for this program are open until September 14th.
Lacking a funding partner, staff is requesting that Council consider an additional
$2,500,000 to meet the needs of the community. If approved, $3,500,000 in total
authorized funds would be spent in following categories:
• Business Grants - Up to $2,700,000
• Business Education - Up to $400,000-$500,000
• Business Portal - Up to $100,000
• Administration - Up to $200,000-$300,000 (Education is a high overhead
effort)
Additionally, if all eligible requests are not able to be funded, Staff requests a
direction from Council regarding a method of allocation of available funding.
Some factors to consider are:
1. Available funding to be proportionally allocated based on requested
amount;
2. Consideration of future viability of the business, i.e., restrict funding to
businesses that have not been doing any business in 2021; and/or
3. Consideration for certain subset of business like industry, economic
status etc.
4. Council authorization of additional funds.
At present, Council is asked to consider increasing its original ARPA allocation
for the above noted programs from $1 million to $3.5 million.
Page 4 of 128
Exhibit A to Resolution
AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT AGREEMENT
Between City of Pasco
and
Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between CITY of Pasco, a
municipality within the State of Washington, with its principal offices at 525 N 3 rd Ave, Pasco,
Washington 9930 l (hereinafter "CITY"), and the Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce, a
Washington non-profit corporation with its principal address at l I l 0 Osprey Pointe Boulevard,
Suite 101, Pasco WA 99301 (hereinafter "CONTRACTOR")
WHEREAS, on March I 1, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act (H.R. 1319), § 4001,
("ARPA") was signed into law providing federal funding relief for American workers, families,
industries, and stare and local governments; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2021, the United State Department of Treasury released an
interim final guide on allowed uses of funds and allocated $350 billion for state, local, territorial,
and Tribal governments from the American Rescue Plan Act Fund; and
WHEREAS, the City received $8,732,156 of its $17,400,000 in allocation on June 8,
202l;and
WHEREAS, the City desires to allocate a substantial portion of its share of the ARPA
Fund allocation to the -~ARPA Business Support Program" to assist small businesses and non-
profit organizations within the City of Pasco that have suffered negative economic impacts as a
result of the COVID-19 public health emergency; and
WHEREAS, under section 602(c)(3.) of ARPA, the City may transfer funds to a private
non-profit entity for the purpose of meeting ARPA's goals: and
WHEREAS, the City ha::. determined that engaging with Contractor would yield
efficiencies in time and process in the development and implementation of the Business Suppo11
Program that are not available to the City alone.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits and covenants contained
herein, the parlies agree as foJlows:
l.
2.
Contract Documents. This Agreement consists of this Agreement and the following
attached Exhibit A, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
Duration of Contract. The tenn of this Agreement shall begin when executed by both
parties and shall expir~ on September 30, 2024.
ARPA Agreement -Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce -I
Page 5 of 128
3. S ervices Provided. Contractor shall perform ARP A grant implementation, education,
and portal creation functions and services for the City for the duration of the Agreement,
as detailed in the Scope of Work and made part of this Agreement. All City funds
provided under this Agreement shall be used for the purposes of fonding the ARPA Act
Business Support Program totaling $1,000,000.
4. Contract Rep resentatives. The parties' representatives are as follows:
For Contractor
For City:
Colin Hastings. Executive Dtrector
Pasco Chamber of Commerce
1110 Osprey Pointe Blvd., Suite 10 I 0
Pasco, WA 9930 l
David K. Zabe11, City Manager
City of Pasco
525 N. 3'd Ave.
Pasco, WA 9930 I
A party may change its representative by providing prompt written notice to the other
party.
5. Com pensation and Invoicin g. The parties acknowledge that Federal funding, passed
through the City, is made available to support Contactor personnel in their work on
ARPA Business Support Program development and implementation of services described
in this Agreement. To compensate Contractor for the work to be performed under this
agreement, the City agrees to pay the Contractor the amount that is 15% to 20% of the
contract amount. The Contractor shall submit an invoice to the City on a quarterly basis.
Contractor shall provide the City with the necessary information to meet the City's
reporting requirements to the US Depa1tment of Treasury. These include maintaining
adequate records to demonstrate funds are utilized in accordance with the purposes of
ARP A, along with the recipient, amount, and date of transfer. The City may request
additional information, as needed, to meet Treasury guidelines. No invoices may be
submitted after October 31, 2024. The City shall make payments within twenty-eight (28)
days of receipt of the invoice from the Contractor.
6. Amendment and Changes in Work. No amendment, modification, or renewal of this
Agreement shall be effective, unless set forth in a written amendment signed by both
paiiies.
7. Hold Harmless and Indemnification.
7.1 The Contractor shall hold harmless, indemnify, and defend the City and its
officers, officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims,
actions, suits, liabilities, losses, expenses, damages, and judgements of any nature
whatsoever, including reasonable costs and attorney's fees in defense thereof, for
injury, sickness, disability, or death to persons or damage to property or business,
ARP A Agreement -Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce -2
-I
Page 6 of 128
arising in connection with the work performed under this Contract, or caused or
occasioned in whole or in part by reason of the presence of the Contractor, or its
subcontractors or their property upon or in proximity of the property of the City.
Provided, that the Contractor's obligation hereunder shall not extend to the injury,
sickness, death, or damage caused by or arising out of the sole negligence of the
City or its officers, officials, employees, or agents.
7.2 In any and all claims against the City and its officers, officials, employees, and
agents by any employee of the Contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or
indirectly employed by any of them, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be
liable~ the indemnification obligation under this section shall not be limited in any
way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation, or
benefits payable by or for the Contractor or subcontractor under Workers
Compensatjon acts, disability benefits acts, or other employee benefit acts, it
being clearly agreed and understood by the parties hereto that the Contractor
expressly waives any immunity the Contractor might have under such laws,
including but not limited to Title 51 of the Revised Code of Washington. By
executing this Contract, the Contractor acknowledges that the foregoing waiver
has been mutually negotiated by the parties and hat the provisions of this section
shall be incorporated, as relevant, into any contract ~he Contractor makes with any
subcontractor or agent perfo1ming work hereunder. Contractor obligations under
this Section 7 shal1 survive termination and expiration of this Contract.
7.3 The Contractor's obligations hereunder shall include, but are not limited to,
investigating, adjusting, and defending all claims alleging loss from action, enor,
or omission, or breach of any common law, statutory, or other delegated duty by
the Contractor, or the Contractor's employees, agents, or subcontractors.
8. Insurance.
8.1 Workers Compensation: Contractor shall comply with all Washington State
Workers Compensation laws. Except as prohibited by law, Contractor waives all
right of subrogation against the City for recovery of damages to the extent they
are covered by workers compensation, employer's liability, commercial liability
or commercial umbrella liability insurance.
8.2 Commercial General Liability [nsurance: Contractor shall maintain commercial
general liability coverage for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage,
subject to limits of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence.
The general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Contract and be no less
than two million dollars ($2,000,000). Contractor shall provide certificate of such
insurance to City's representative prior to start of work, with City as Certificate
Holder.
8.3 Verification of Coverage and Acceptability of Insurers: All insurance required
under this Contract shall be issued by companies admitted to do business within
ARP A Agreement -Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce -3
Page 7 of 128
the State of Washington and have a rating of A-, Class VII or better in the most
recently published edition of Best's Reports.
9. Termination. The City may terminate this Contract in whole or in part whenever the
City detennines, in its sole discretion that such tern1ination is in the best interests of the
City. The City may tenninate this Contract upon giving ( 10) days written noticed by
certified mail to the Contractor. In that event, the City shall pay the Contractor for
invoices previously submitted in accordance with this Agreement and a pro-rata payment
for the portion of the month for which services were rendered prior to the date any such
tennination is effective.
10. Comp liance with Laws. The Contractor, shall comply wlth all applicable federal, state,
and local laws, rules and regulations in performing this Agreement, including, but not
limited to, prevailing wage laws.
1 t. .Nond iscrimination. The Contractor, its assignees, delegates, or subcontractors shall not
discriminate against any person in the performance of any of its obligations hereunder on
the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin. age sex, marital status, veteran
status, or the presence of any disability.
12. Dis putes. Differences over the Contractor's perfom1ance will be promptly addressed in
writing by the aggravated party in order that such matters may be settled, or other
appropriate action promptly taken. Any dispute relating to the quality or acceptability of
performance and/or compensation due the Contractor shall be decided by the City's
Contract Representative or designee. All rulings, orders, instructions, and decisions of the
·city's Contract Representative shall be final and conclusive, subject to Contractor's right
to seek judicial relief. Prior to seeking judicial relief, the parties agree to meet in good
13.
14.
15.
faith to discuss and attempt to resolve any issues. In the event the parties are unable to
reach an agreement on the dispute, the parties agree to submit their dispute to binding
arbitration pursuant to the Uniform Arbitration Act RCW 7.04A, et seq. Venue shall be
Franklin County Superior Court, and the parties agree that the laws of the State of
Washington shall govem any dispute, to the extent pennitted by law.
Entire A g reement. The parties agree that this Agreement is the complete expression of
the agreement. Any oral or written represenlatives or understandings not incorporated in
this Contract are specifically excluded.
Notices. Any notices shall be effective if personally served upon the other party if mailed
be registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the addresses set out in Article
4 above. Notice may also be given by facsimile with the original to follow by regular
mail. Notice shall be deemed to be effective three (3) days following the date o,f mailing
or immediately of personally served.
Inde pendent Contractor. Nothing herein shall be constmed as creating an agency
relationship. The City shall not control the manner in which Contractor perfonns its
duties under this agreement, and the parties agree the Contractor shall perform these
ARP A Agreement -G realer Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce -4
Page 8 of 128
duties as an independent contractor. The Contractor shall maintain independent discretion
over the manner in which it perfom1s the services under this agreement, and the City's
authority to terminate the agreement shall not be constmed as an ability to manage how
Contractor performs its duties under this agreement.
16. Severability. If any portion of this agreement is found to be unenforceable, the remaining
provisions shall be enforceable and shall not render the contract void.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to the signed by
their duly constituted legal representatives and is effective on the last date · ned.
Dave abell~ C ty Manager
c~ of Pasco .,kh ~ ft "' ..... ...,. ....__,_ ' , 1)&r,Ji ~~ ~
Dated: ~ f.o/ 1.0 &{
ATTEST:
~&L
Debra Barham, CMC
City Clerk
Colin Hastings, Execu v · Director
Greater Pasco Chambe f Commerce
Dated: __ i ...a.........} /_Co--+-/ _2ozJ __ _
ARPA Agreement-Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce -5
Page 9 of 128
Exhibit A
City of Pasco American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) for Businesses Support Program
City of Pasco, WA is initiating a request for proposal from the Pasco Chamber of Commerce for
utilization of American Rescue Plan Act dollars to support local businesses that have been
severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the executive orders by the Governor of
Washington regulating business activities.
City of Pasco has approximately $1,000,000 to assist affected businesses in fonn of grant
distribution, business education, and business portal creation.
Background of organizations:
Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce
The Pasco Chamber of Commerce is a nonprofit federally recognized 50l(c)(6) focused on
business and economic develo pment in Pasco, Washington. The Pasco Chamber of Commerce
mission is to foster a vibrant local business environment and to enhance the quality of life in our
reg10n.
The Pasco Chamber of Commerce was established in 1912 and has served as the "front door" for
tens of thousands of individuals and businesses for l 00 years. From business to agriculture to
education, the Chamber is a major supporter of the Greater Pasco Area.
Pasco Chamber of Commerce Leadership
Jason Hogue, American Family Insurance, President of the Board
Joe Roach, Atkins Engineering, Immediate Past President
Tara Wiswall, Edward Jones, Past President
Randy Hayden, Port of Pasco, Vice President
Kim Fall, Conover [nsurance, Vice President
Dave Zabell, CITY of Pasco, Board member
Delt Clark, Christensen Inc., Board member
Vicki Haines, Atomic Dermatology, Board member
Shane Edinger, Pasco School District, Board member
Derrel Ebert, Tri-CITY Dust Devils, Board member
Nick Punch, Baker Boyer Bank, Board member
Rob Di Piazza, Hometown Values Magazine, Board member
Janet Mick, Minuteman Press, Board member
Rolando Rodriguez, Sol Case Management, Board member
Brief background of staff who will be involved in providing services under the proposed
cont,·act.
Colin Hastings, Executive Director of the Pasco Chamber of Commerce
ARP A Agreement -Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce -6
I
Page 10 of 128
Prior to accepting the Executive Director position for the Pasco Chamber in 20 l l, Mr.
Hastings and his wife owned a couple of small service-retail businesses and operated a
small cherry orchard outside of Pasco.
Mr. Hastings sits on the Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund (hanfordfund.com).
Meier Architecture & Engineering Board of Directors, and serves as Chairman of the
Board of Directors for the Annual Water Follies event featuring Unlimited Hydroplane
Races held each year in the Tri-Cities. He is also on the Board of Directors for the Pasco
Kiwanis Club, Pacific Technology Alliance promoting rural broadband access and the
Washington Policy Center Eastern WA Advisory Board. Mr. Hastings graduated from
Seattle University with a degree in Business Administration.
Contact information.
Colin Hastings, Executive Director, Pasco Chamber of Commerce
1110 Osprey Pointe Boulevard Suite t 0 I
Pasco, WA 9930 l
www.pascochambe r.org
509-547•9755
City of Pasco Business Support Program to address negative economic impacts of COVID-/9
pandemic
1. Create accessible and bilingual business assistance grants available for businesses. Grants
can be distributed in increments ofup to $30,000 based on need and proof ofrevenue loss
during the period of March 27, 2020 to December 31, 2021. Businesses located in City
of Pasco and demonstrating adverse effects financially will be eligible to apply.
2. Create business education programs to assist them in following areas:
a. Accounting
b. Regulatory Compliance
c. Business development
d . Market analysis
1. External analysis
2. Internal analysis
3. Business Plan implementation
4. Hiring Pracli<.:es
e. Inventory control/organization
l. Operational needs
2. Minimize overhead
3. Creation of business portal
ARP A Agreement -Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce -7
Page 11 of 128
The Business Support Program will approach this engagement with a tiered approach:
l. Create a bilingual culturally competent media outreach campaign to targeted businesses
using print, radio, social media (Facebool<-El Face), WhatsApp, television and through
collaboration with the non-profit organizations to educate small/minority business owners
of the eligibility for grant dollars. Emphasis wi11 be placed on meeting the business
where they are at, which can include face to face interactions.
2. Targeted businesses will be encouraged to apply online with easy-to-use fillable fonn. A
committee will be formed to review the applications to ensure businesses are eligible and
meet the criteria for the grant.
3. The Pasco Chamber Board of Directors representatives will fonn a committee to make
the detennination dispersing grants to eligible applicants.
To accommodate the intensive effort involved in deploying diverse communication effort to
reach out to local businesses and education efforts, City of Pasco will provide 15%-20% in
administrative cost of the program. Greater Pasco Chamber of Commerce will provide City of
Pasco with bi-annual reports with:
I. Breakdown of administrative costs by program areas :
a. Labor
b. Marketing
c. Software Purchase
d. Professional Services
ARP A Agreement -Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce -8
-I
Page 12 of 128
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 9, 2021
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/13/21
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Life and Safety Program for Commercial Structures
I. REFERENCE(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
There has been discussion of the use of ARPA funds for code improvements to
privately owned commercial structures both City-wide and in particular areas
(Downtown). As the mechanics of such a program are formulated, staff would
benefit from Council a more focused discussion of the several policy issues such
a program poses.
V. DISCUSSION:
In discussing the concept among key staff and business owners, it was evident
that due to some of the complexities that have arisen, additional discussion
among the policy makers is needed to bring focus and clarity to any program the
City may put forward. Complicating the discussion is that allowable uses differ
by funding source, federal CDBG funds are limited to qualified census tracts,
federal ARPA funds geared toward COVID impacts and recovery, the City's
General Fund dollars compete with essential government services, overall
community needs, and are limited by the State Constitution with respect to
lending of government credit and gifting of public funds.
In consideration of the above, the potential funding source(s) for different
activities vary and must be considered as part of any implementation strategy.
Page 13 of 128
In crafting a plan to address what Council has discussed thus far and what has
been brought forward by business community members, which has perhaps
been broad enough to exceed the prescribed uses of ARPA monies, a
discussion among Council will assist in being able to match project categories
with potential funding sources and timelines (as they pertain to specific funds)
and bring back alternatives for Council consideration.
To aid in Council's deliberations, staff has provided the policy related areas
below as a starting point:
Program focus:
• Correcting long-standing deficiencies within privately owned buildings
• Aiding the efforts of local business owners to recover from the impacts of
the pandemic and related mitigation measures by finding ways to assist
them e.g. their of rating properties; the increasing in occupancy
encouraging outside seating, addressing building deficiencies to allow for
occupancy of their building, upgrades to food preparation areas, etc.
Improvement types:
• Building improvements related to ingress/egress
• Electrical improvements
• Fire suppression provisions
• Facade improvements or windows
• Weatherization
Business and building type:
• Buildings constructed prior to a given year - this has a nexus with
International Building Code
• Common wall or stand alone
• City-wide or limited to a specific geographical area
• Those buildings housing a commercial activity that has been in business
for a particular length of time
• Type of business; restaurant, retail, warehouse, industrial, etc.
(restaurants and other hospitality industry can utilize ARPA funds)
Eligibility:
• Building owner
• Business owner/tenant
• Either
Grant or loan based program:
• Loans are more complicated to administer but may provide seed money
for maintaining an ongoing Program; grants are easier to administer but
should include prioritization on eligibility requirements
Page 14 of 128
• If a grant, should there be a cost sharing component - eg: a certain
percentage paid by the owner or tenant
• Type of security for loan if business owner
• Loan may not be possible/practical for some funding; e.g. ARPA (2026
deadline to spend funds)
• Level of participation by the owner or business owner for the requested
improvements
Accommodate current/existing use or tailor to allow an expansion:
• If current use, can the improvement/expenditure be tied to COVID (ARPA
finds)
• If expansion, will the entire array of necessary code improvements be
funded or limited in some fashion
Staff is seeking Council discussion on these policy questions to help guide
further development of the potential program(s) needed to meet Council's
objectives.
Page 15 of 128
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 3, 2021
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/13/21
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution - I-182/Broadmoor Interchange Improvements – DKS
Associates, Inc. Professional Services Agreement (Design)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Draft Resolution
Draft Professional Services Agreement (PSA)
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Design Phase: $679,073.00
Construction Phase: To be determined during design and coordination with
WDOT
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The existing freeway interchange (I/C) at Broadmoor Blvd. (Rd. 100) and I -182
serves as the areas primary access point for a large segment of the City's
population in the westerly portion of the City. As development has occurred over
the past decade or more in Pasco, demands on the existing I/C have increased
proportionately. The cumulative effects of increased commercial development
to the south of the interstate, office and commercial uses along Sandifur Blvd. in
the area, residential development east of Broadmoor/Rd. 100, both north and
south of the interstate, along with the impact of the development of Burns Rd.
between Rd. 68 and Broadmoor Blvd. as a minor arterial have all served to fully
utilize the existing I/C. During afternoon peaks hours, it is not uncommon for
eastbound traffic to back up down the off ramp and into the mainline of I-182.
The aforementioned deficiencies and the need for improvements to the I/C were
identified in the Transportation Element of the recently adopted Comprehensive
Page 16 of 128
Land Use Plan, the draft Transportation System Master Plan, and for these
reasons a project to implement such improvements was included by City Council
in the adoption of the City Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan this past
June.
capacity of need is I/C in the development, additional Without subject
improvements. That said, and as Council is aware, the Broad moor area is ripe
for development, the extension of sewer to the area and subsequent efforts such
as the NW Area Sewer Local Improvement District (LID) project, comp plan
update, the new for area prepared and economy booming a and have
transformational development. As developers continue to show a keen interest
in the greater Broadmoor area, recent traffic analyses completed, as part of the
Transportation System Master Plan, confirm the need for improvements to the I-
182 off ramps at the Broadmoor/Road 100 interchange. Increased traffic from
new development will exacerbate existing traffic back ups onto mainline I -182
causing greater congestion and delays.
Proposed improvements to be explored with the Washington State Department
of Transportation (WSDOT) will include an eastbound loop offramp and an
additional right turn lane on the westbound offramp. The final agreed upon
improvements will ensure a much-improved level of service at this interchange
that will safely accommodate current demands and future d evelopment within
the greater Broadmoor area.
V. DISCUSSION:
In furthering Council goals in the areas of safety, transportation and quality of
life, staff issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for design services for the I-
182/Broadmoor Interchange (DKS) Associates, Inc. Improvements. DKS
submitted a response to the RFQ and was selected as the most highly qualified
firm for this work.
The attached scope of work and fee addresses the planning phase of the
project, which will help determine the proposed improvements. This is
accomplished through the development, and WSDOT approval, of an Access
Revision Report (ARR). This scope will ensure all WSDOT/FHWA required
processes are followed and documents prepared for the proposed changes to
an existing federal interstate interchange.
Once the planning phase is under way and final/preferred improvements
identified, an amendment to this PSA will be brought to Council for the design
phase. This will include the final design and development of the plans,
specifications, and estimates (PSE) (bid package) with the intent to bid the
project for construction next year.
Page 17 of 128
City staff and DKS negotiated the proposed scope of work and fee and staff
recommends approval of the Professional Services Agreement with DKS for the
design phase of the I-182/Broadmoor Interchange Improvement project in the
amount of $679,073.00. The biennial budget will be amended as part of the mid -
term biennial budget amendment process.
This item is currently scheduled for approval at Council’s September 20, 2021
regular meeting.
Page 18 of 128
Resolution – PSA with DKS
1-182/Broadmoor Interchange Improvements Resolution - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BY THE CITY MANAGER WITH
DKS ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR THE DESIGN OF THE I-182/BROADMOOR
INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington requires professional services from an
engineering firm for the purpose of design services for the I-182/Broadmoor Interchange
Improvements project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco published an announcement of its Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) related to its general need for professional services of design and
environmental services as required by RCW 39.80.030; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco reviewed and scored the one response received and
determined DKS to be the most highly qualified pursuant to RCW 39.80.040; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, pursuant to RCW 39.80.050(1), has negotiated a fair and
reasonable PSA with DKS Associates, Inc. based on the estimated value of the services including
their scope, complexity, and professional nature; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco hereby finds that DKS Associates, Inc. is the most highly
qualified firm to perform the necessary design services for the I-182/Broadmoor Interchange
Improvement Project, and the negotiated contract is both fair and reasonable, for an amount not to
exceed $679,073.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Manager for the City of Pasco is hereby authorized to execute the
Professional Services Agreement with DKS Associates, Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, and to make minor substantive changes as
necessary to execute the Agreement; and
Be It Further Resolved that this Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption.
Page 19 of 128
Resolution – PSA with DKS
1-182/Broadmoor Interchange Improvements Resolution - 2
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this ___ day of September,
2021.
_____________________________
Saul Martinez
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 20 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 1 of 10
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
21292 – I-182 and Broadmoor Boulevard Interchange
Agreement No. 21-044
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the City of Pasco, a Washington
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City”, and DKS Associates, Inc., hereinafter
referred to as “Consultant,” on the _______ day of _________________, 2021.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to have certain services and/or tasks performed as set forth
below requiring specialized skills, training, equipment, and other supportive capabilities; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant represents that it is qualified and possesses sufficient skills,
experience, equipment, and necessary capabilities, including: technical and professional expertise,
when required, to perform the services and/or tasks as set forth in this Agreement upon which the
City is relying.
WHEREAS, the City has, consistent with RCW 39.80, published an announcement related
to its need for Architectural and Engineering services, evaluated Consultant’s current performance
data, and has determined that Consultant is the most highly qualified firm to perform the
Architectural and Engineering services related to the 21292 – I-182 and Broadmoor Boulevard
Interchange project; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Public Works Director finds that the Agreement with Consultant
is both fair and reasonable in light of the duties to be performed, the Consultant’s performance
data, and the nature and complexity of the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, and performances
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1.Scope of Services. The Consultant shall perform such services and accomplish such tasks,
including the furnishing of all labor, materials, facilities and equipment necessary for full
performance thereof, as identified and designated as Consultant’s Responsibilities
throughout this Agreement, and as more particularly described in Scope of Work detailed
in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Project”).
2.Term. This Project shall begin on the execution date listed above and promptly be
completed by 12/31/2024.
3.Compensation and Payment.
3.1 Payment for services provided hereunder shall be made following the performance
of such services. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or
EXHIBIT A
Page 21 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 2 of 10
services rendered, and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals
necessary to complete the Project.
3.2 No payment shall be made for any services rendered by the Consultant except for
services identified and set forth in this Agreement except as may be authorized by
a written supplemental agreement approved by the City.
3.3 The City shall pay the Consultant for work performed under this Agreement upon
timely submitted invoices detailing work performed and expenses for which
reimbursement is sought. The City shall approve all invoices before payment is
issued. Payment shall occur within thirty (30) days of receipt and approval of an
invoice.
3.4 The City shall pay the Consultant for all work performed and expenses incurred
under this Agreement, as follows.
☒ Hourly (Multiple Rate): Such rates as identified on Exhibit B, plus actual
expenses incurred as provided under this Agreement, but not to exceed a
total of $679,073.00 without the prior written authorization by the City.
4. Reports and Inspections.
4.1 The Consultant at such times and in such forms as the City may require, shall
furnish to the City such statements, records, studies, surveys, reports, data, and
information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this
Agreement.
4.2 The Consultant shall, at any time during normal business hours and as often as the
City or the Washington State Auditor may reasonably deem necessary, make
available for examination all of its records and data with respect to all matters
covered, directly or indirectly, by this Agreement and shall permit the City, or its
designated authorized representative to audit and inspect other data relating to all
matters covered by this Agreement. The City shall receive a copy of all audit
reports made by the agency or firm as to the Consultant’s activities. The City may,
at its discretion, conduct an audit at its expense, using its own or outside auditors,
of the Consultant’s activities which relate, directly or indirectly, to this Agreement.
Consultant shall be provided a copy of such reports.
4.3 The Consultant, during the term of this Agreement, shall obtain all permits and
registration documents necessary for the performance of its work and for the
execution of services at its own expense, and shall maintain its validity. Upon
request, the Consultant shall deliver to the City copies of these licenses, registration
documents, and permits or proof of their issuance or renewal.
4.4 Consultant shall maintain books, records and documents, which sufficiently and
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of this
Page 22 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 3 of 10
Agreement, and shall maintain such accounting procedures and practices as may be
necessary to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement.
These records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection, review, or
audit as provided above.
4.5 The Consultant shall retain all books, records, documents or other material relevant
to this Agreement for three (3) years after its expiration. Consultant agrees that the
City, or its designee, shall have full access and right to examine any of said
materials at all reasonable times during this period.
5. Ownership and Use of Documents.
5.1 All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data, information, drawings and documents
made, collected, or prepared by the Consultant for performing the services subject
to this Agreement, as well as any final product, collectively referred to as “work
product,” shall be deemed as the exclusive property of the City, including copyright
as secured thereon. Consultant may not use them except in connection with the
performance of the services under this Agreement or with the prior written consent
of the City. Any prior copyrighted materials owned by the Consultant and utilized
in the performance of the services under this Agreement, or embedded in with the
materials, products and services provided thereunder, shall remain the property of
the Consultant subject to a license granted to the City for their continued use of the
products and services provided under this Agreement. Any work product used by
the Consultant in the performance of these services which it deems as
“confidential,” “proprietary,” or a “trade secret” shall be conspicuously designated
as such.
5.2 In the event of Consultant’s default, or in the event that this Agreement is
terminated prior to its completion, the work product of the Consultant, along with
a summary of the services performed to date of default or termination, shall become
the property of the City, and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of services
provided shall be prepared at no additional cost, if the Agreement is terminated
through default by the Consultant. If the Agreement is terminated through
convenience by the City, the City agrees to pay Consultant for the preparation of
the summary of services provided.
6. Public Records.
6.1 Consultant acknowledges that the City is an agency subject to Chapter 42.56 RCW
“Public Records Act.” All preliminary drafts or notes prepared or gathered by the
Consultant, and recommendations of the Consultant are exempt prior to the
acceptance by the City or public citation by the City in connection with City action.
6.2 If the Consultant becomes a custodian of public records of the City and request for
such records is received by the City, the Consultant shall respond to the request by
Page 23 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 4 of 10
the City for such records within five (5) business days by either providing the
records, or by identifying in writing the additional time necessary to provide the
records with a description of the reasons why additional time is needed. Such
additional time shall not exceed twenty (20) business days unless extraordinary
good cause is shown.
6.3 In the event the City receives a public records request for protected work product
of the Consultant within its possession, the City shall, prior to the release of any
protected work product or as a result of a public records request or subpoena,
provide Consultant at least ten (10) business days prior written notice of the pending
release and to reasonably cooperate with any legal action which may be initiated
by the Consultant to enjoin or otherwise prevent such release.
7. Independent Contractor Relationship.
7.1 The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship is created by this
Agreement. The City is interested primarily in the results to be achieved; subject
to the scope of services and the specific requirements of this Agreement, the
implementation of services will lie solely with the discretion of the Consultant. No
agent, employee, officer or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be
an employee, agent, officer, or representative of the City for any purpose, and the
employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits or privileges the
City provides for its employees. The Consultant will be solely and entirely
responsible for its acts and for the acts of its agents, employees, officers,
subcontractors or representatives during the performance of this Agreement.
7.2 In the performance of the services provided in this Agreement, Consultant is an
independent contractor with full authority to control and direct the performance of
the details of the work, however, the results of the work contemplated herein must
meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City’s general rights of
inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof.
7.3 The Consultant shall comply with all State and Federal laws including, but not
limited to:
7.3.1 The definition requirements of RCW 50.04.140 (Employment Security).
7.3.2 RCW 51.08.195 (Industrial Insurance).
7.3.3 Obtain a City of Pasco business license.
7.4 The City may, at its sole discretion, require the Consultant to remove any employee,
agent or servant from employment on this Project who, in the City’s sole discretion,
may be detrimental to the City’s interest.
8. Indemnification.
Page 24 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 5 of 10
8.1 The Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, employees, and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries,
damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from the
acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant in performance of this Agreement,
except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City.
8.2 However, should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement
is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out
of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the
concurrent negligence of the Consultant, and the City, its officers, officials,
employees, and volunteers, the Consultant’s liability, including the duty and cost
to defend, hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Consultant’s negligence. It is
further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided
herein constitutes the Consultant’s waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance,
Title 51 RCW, solely for purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been
mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the
expiration or termination of this Agreement.
8.3 No liability shall attach to the City by reason of entering into this Agreement except
as expressly provided herein.
8.4 This indemnification shall include damages, penalties and attorney fees sustained
as a result of Consultant’s delayed or failed performance of Section 6 above.
9. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its
agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. The Consultant’s maintenance of
insurance as required by the Agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the
Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City’s
recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
9.1 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types and
coverage described below:
9.1.1 Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and
leased vehicles. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services
Office (ISO) form CA 00 01.
9.1.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as ISO
occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises,
operations, stop-gap independent contractors and personal injury and
advertising injury. The City shall be named as an additional insured under
the Consultant’s Commercial General Liability insurance policy with
Page 25 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 6 of 10
respect to the work performed for the City using an additional insured
endorsement at least as broad as ISO endorsement form CG 20 26.
9.1.3 Workers’ Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance
laws of the State of Washington.
9.1.4 Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession.
9.2 Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following
insurance limits:
9.2.1 Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for
bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident.
9.2.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less
than:
☒ $2,000,000 each occurrence; and
☒ $2,000,000 general aggregate;
9.2.3 Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than:
☒ $2,000,000 per claim; and
☒ $2,000,000 policy aggregate limit;
9.3 Other Insurance Provision. The Consultant’s Automobile Liability, Professional
Liability, and Commercial General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be
endorsed to contain that they shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any
insurance, self-insurance, or self-insured pool coverage maintained by the City
shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
9.3.1 The Consultant’s insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not
be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice
by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
9.4 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best rating of not less than A: VII.
9.5 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including, but not
necessarily limited to, the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance
requirements of the Agreement before commencement of the work.
9.6 Notice of Cancellation. The Consultant shall provide the City with written notice
of any policy cancellation within two (2) business days of their receipt of such
notice.
Page 26 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 7 of 10
9.7 City Full Availability of Consultant Limits. If the Consultant maintains higher
insurance limits than the minimums shown above, the City shall be insured for the
full available limits of Commercial General and Excess or Umbrella liability
maintained by the Consultant, irrespective of whether such limits maintained by the
Consultant are greater than those required by this Agreement or whether any
certificate of insurance furnished to the City evidences limits of liability lower than
those maintained by the Consultant.
9.8 Failure to Maintain Insurance. Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of contract, upon which the
City may, after giving five (5) business days notice to the Consultant to correct the
breach, immediately terminate the Agreement or, at its discretion, procure or renew
such insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any
sums so expended to be repaid to the City on demand, or at t he sole discretion of
the City, offset against funds due the Consultant from the City.
10. Nondiscrimination. In the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant will not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the grounds of race,
creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental
or physical handicap; provided that the prohibition against discrimination in employment
because of handicap shall not apply if the particular disability prevents the proper
performance of the particular worker involved. The Consultant shall ensure that applicants
are employed, and that employees are treated during employment in the performance of
this Agreement without discrimination because of their race, creed, color, national origin,
sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap.
Consultant shall take such action with respect to this Agreement as may be required to
ensure full compliance with local, State and Federal laws prohibiting discrimination in
employment.
11. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company, firm, or person, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement; and that it has not paid
or agreed to pay any company, person or firm, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or
other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement.
12. Assignment and Subcontracting.
12.1 The City has awarded this Agreement to the Consultant due to its unique
qualifications to perform these services. The Consultant shall not assign (or
subcontract other than as specifically identified in Exhibit A) its performance under
this Agreement or any portions of this Agreement without the prior written consent
Page 27 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 8 of 10
of the City, which consent must be sought at least thirty (30) days prior to the date
of any proposed assignment.
12.2 Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each
provision of this Agreement including Section 6, Public Records; Section 10,
Nondiscrimination; proper bidding procedures where applicable; and all local, State
and Federal statutes, ordinances and guidelines.
12.3 Any technical or professional service subcontract not listed in this Agreement, must
have prior written approval by the City.
13. Termination.
13.1 Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any
reason upon giving the other party no less than ten (10) business days written notice
in advance of the effective date of such termination.
13.2 Termination for Cause. If the Consultant fails to perform in the manner called for
in this Agreement, or if the Consultant fails to comply with any other provisions of
this Agreement and fails to correct such noncompliance within five (5) business
days of written notice thereof, the City may terminate this Agreement for cause.
Termination shall be effected by serving a notice of termination on the Consultant
setting forth the manner in which the Consultant is in default. The Consultant will
only be paid for services and expenses complying with the terms of this Agreement,
incurred prior to termination.
14. General Provisions.
14.1 For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
14.2 Notice. Notice provided for in this Agreement shall be sent by:
14.2.1 Personal service upon the Project Administrators; or
14.2.2 Certified mail to the physical address of the parties, or by electronic
transmission to the e-mail addresses designated for the parties below.
14.3 The Project Administrator for the purpose of this Agreement shall be:
14.3.1 For the City: Steve M. Worley, P.E., or his/her designee
Public Works Director
525 North 3rd
PO Box 293
Pasco WA 99301
WorleyS@pasco-wa.gov (e-mail address)
Page 28 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 9 of 10
14.3.2 For the Consultant: Aaron Berger, P.E., or his/her designee
Senior Transportation Engineer
720 SW Washington Street, Suite 500
Portland, OR 97205
adb@dksassociates.com (e-mail address)
15. Dispute Resolution.
15.1 This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and entered
into and delivered within the State of Washington and it is agreed by each party
hereto that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington.
15.2 In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default, or
interpretation of this Agreement, the Project Administrators, or their designees,
shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the event the dispute
cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be resolved by
arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, with both parties waiving the right
of a jury trial upon trial de novo, with venue placed in Pasco, Franklin County,
Washington. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable
attorney fees and costs as additional award and judgment against the other.
16. Nonwaiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other similar event or
other provision of this Agreement.
17. Integration. This Agreement between the parties consists in its entirety of this document
and any exhibits, schedules or attachments. Any modification of this Agreement or change
order affecting this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties.
18. Authorization. By signature below, each party warrants that they are authorized and
empowered to execute this Agreement binding the City and the Consultant respectively.
Page 29 of 128
Professional Services Agreement – DKS Associates, Inc. Agreement No. 21-044
Interchange Improvements at Interstate 182/Road 100 Page 10 of 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date first written above.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON CONSULTANT
Dave Zabell – City Manager Richard J. Hutchinson – Managing Principal
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC, City Attorney
Page 30 of 128
INTERSTATE 182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD
INTERCHANGE PROJECT – SCOPE OF WORK
DATE: September 8, 2021
TO: Steve Worley | City of Pasco
FROM: Aaron Berger, PE | DKS Associates
Richard Hutchinson, PE | DKS Associates
SUBJECT: I-182 and Broadmoor Boulevard Interchange Project
Scope of Work
Project #21292
SCOPE OF WORK
INTRODUCTION
The City of Pasco expects to experience significant growth in the currently undeveloped northwest
portion of the City known as the “Broadmoor Area”. Broadmoor Boulevard is the primary arterial
connection between the regional freeway system (I-182) and this new growth area (located west of
Broadmoor Boulevard). The City of Pasco has identified several local improvements to Broadmoor
Boulevard both north and south of the I-182/Broadmoor Boulevard interchange to serve both the
short and long-term needs of the Broadmoor Area. The City has led recent traffic planning and
analysis efforts at the interchange, including the City of Pasco Transportation Master Plan, the
City’s most recent Comprehensive Plan update, master planning efforts for the Broadmoor Area,
and the most recent focused analysis of the existing and future needs at the I-182/Broadmoor
Boulevard interchange. All these planning efforts have consistently identified the current I-
182/Broadmoor Boulevard interchange as both an existing and future system deficiency for
multiple modes of travel.
The I-182/Broadmoor Boulevard interchange project is intended to identify, recommend, and
design a solution that addresses the short and long-term interchange needs for all modes of travel.
The I-182/Broadmoor Boulevard interchange project is a multi-phase program that consists of two
phases:
Phase 1: Access Revision Report (ARR) and Initial Environmental Permitting Process
EXHIBIT A
Page 31 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 2
Phase 2: Interchange Design
This scope of work addresses Phase 1 of the project, which includes the following:
• Project Methods and Assumptions
• WSDOT Access Revision Report (ARR)
• Basis of Design
• Alternatives Evaluation
• Initial Environmental Permitting Process
o Design Assistance and Early Agency Coordination
o Planning and Environmental Linkage Report
The completion of the interchange design phase is contingent on approval of Phase 1 by
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Federal Highways Administration
(FHWA) approval. This document is the scope for Phase 1 of the project, including the Basis of
Design and Alternatives Analysis Evaluation, which support the ARR process, as well as the
concurrent environmental tasks needed to meet State and Federal permitting requirements.
PHYSICAL PROJECT LIMITS
The immediate project area is approximately located on I-182 from the Columbia River to Road 68,
bounded by Argent Road to the south and Sandifur Parkway to the north (see Figure 1). The
roadway connections, intersections, and interchange improvements, if implemented, would relieve
motor vehicle operations and safety deficiencies at the I-182/Broadmoor Boulevard interchange,
and complete a safe north-south route for cyclists and pedestrians either on or parallel to
Broadmoor Boulevard through the interchange.
Page 32 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 3
FIGURE 1 : PROJECT STUDY AREA
The project limits for the project traffic analysis and modeling include:
Freeway:
• I-182 from the Columbia River to Road 68
Roadways:
• Broadmoor Boulevard from Argent Road to Sandifur Parkway
Intersections:
Up to 15 intersections (including up to four ramp terminal intersections) will be analyzed in this
study. The exact locations of these intersections will be defined in the Methods and Assumptions
task.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
This SOW details work elements needed to support the CITY in selecting of a preferred interchange
alternative, gaining the necessary agency approvals, and completing the permitting process to
allow the project to advance into the design phase. The SOW shall consist of the following major
work elements.
• Work Element 1 – Project Management
• Work Element 2 – WSDOT Access Revision Report (ARR)
• Work Element 3 – Basis of Design Broadmoor BlvdChapel Hill Blvd
Chapel Hill Blvd
Sandifur Pkwy
Burden Blvd
N
Argent Rd
Page 33 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 4
• Work Element 4 – Alternatives Analysis and Evaluation
• Work Element 5 – Environmental Documentation, Biological Assessment, and Permit
Coordination
• Work Element 6 – Public Involvement
• Work Element 7 – Funding Strategy
Page 34 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 5
WORK TASKS
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORTS AND BILLINGS
The CONSULTANT shall prepare monthly progress reports, in a form approved by the CITY, that
outlines in written and graphical forms the various phases of the work, and the order of
performance, in sufficient detail so that the progress of the work can be easily evaluated. These
reports shall
• Highlight project milestones
• Target potential problem areas needing special attention or coordination prior to delays
occurring and provide a proposal for addressing problem areas
• Outline activities planned for the next period
• Compare actual work progress with contractual obligations
• Show work complete (%) versus budget expended (%) for major tasks
Progress reports shall include current scheduling reports, indicating all progress to date and
resources expended. Progress shall be monitored and reported in diagram and quantitative forms
to present a clear, concise, and understandable picture of the project status. This update shall also
include any changes in schedule, sequence, or resource loading. If any schedule delays have
occurred, a plan for bringing the work back on schedule, and back on budget, shall be included.
Invoices shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT in a form and detail as approved by the CITY, and
submitted on a monthly basis. These shall be supported by detailed record keeping closely
tracking the project budget and expenditures.
Deliverable(s)
• Monthly progress reports, incorporating project schedule revisions as appropriate (electronic
copy)
• Monthly invoices
1.2 PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with SUBCONSULTANTs regarding contracting procedures, shall
prepare and execute contracts with individual SUBCONSULTANTs, and shall address contract-
related issues with the SUBCONSULTANTs as they arise during the project. As part of this task, the
CONSULTANT shall also provide as-needed support to the CITY in the internal administration
functions of the PROJECT.
Page 35 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 6
1.3 PROJECT SCHEDULE
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a project schedule that includes completion of all items identified in
this SOW. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a draft project schedule for the CITY to review.
Following the CITY’s review, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a final project schedule that
incorporates CITY comments.
The CONSULTANT’s project manager shall conduct the project tracking, document control, and
coordination efforts necessary for project execution. These efforts shall include the continuous
tracking of schedules, budgets, and products; coordination with SUBCONSULTANTs relating to work
in progress; and coordination with WSDOT and FHWA.
Deliverable(s)
• Draft project schedule
• Final project schedule
1.4 PROJECT KICK-OFF MEETING AND SITE WALKTHROUGH
The CONSULTANT shall prepare for and attend the project kick-off meeting in Pasco. This meeting
will include video conferencing options for project stakeholder attendees. The CITY will coordinate
the meeting and will invite agency staff. The CONSULTANT will prepare the meeting agenda and
meeting materials. All CONSULTANT attendees will also attend a project site walkthrough to
understand the needs and constraints of the existing interchange and surrounding area.
Assumptions
• Meeting will be attended by up to six members of the CONSULTANT Team
• Meeting duration will be 1.5 hours
• Site walkthrough will be conducted on the same day as the kick-off meeting and is expected to
last no more than 1.5 hours on-site
Deliverable(s)
• Project kick-off meeting attend by the CONSULTANT in Pasco.
• Project site walkthrough attended by the CONSULTANT team
1.5 PROJECT MANAGER CHECK-INS
The CONSULTANT shall host weekly 30-minute project management check-in meetings with the
City project manager. The CONSULTANT shall use these meetings to apprise the City project
manager of ongoing work tasks, upcoming review periods, schedule changes, and other project
management related items.
Assumptions
• Meetings will be attended by the CONSULTANT Project Manager or Deputy Project Manager, the
City Project Manager, and other City staff as needed
Page 36 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 7
• Meeting durations will be 0.5 hours
Deliverable(s)
• Weekly project manager check-in meetings hosted by the CONSULTANT via video conferencing.
2 WSDOT ACCESS REVISION REPORT (ARR)
The first step in Phase 1 of the project is to form support teams. These teams will assist the City to
create a project purpose and need statement. Per guidance from the support teams, the project
team will then either begin a Non-Access Feasibility Study or advance directly to the ARR. This
scope of work assumes that after the completion of the project purpose and need statement, the
project will move directly into the ARR.
The second step in the ARR phase of the project is to complete Access Revision Report
memorandum. The CONSULTANT shall prepare an Access Revision Report (ARR) on behalf of the
City for WSDOT as it relates to the eastbound ramp terminal at the Broadmoor Boulevard and I-
182 interchange per the current requirements of the WSDOT Design Manual. The Basis of Design
(Section 4) and Alternatives Analysis and Evaluation (Section 5) will be performed concurrently
with the ARR, providing the alternatives selection, evaluation, screening process and preferred
alternative required to complete the ARR. This effort shall require the layout of separate
roundabout and other interchange alternatives, which shall help determine the footprint and the
feasibility of each interchange alternative. The CONSULANT shall prepare the memorandum, which
shall be provided to the CITY for review prior to submitting it to WSDOT for review and approval.
2.1 BACKGROUND/DATA COLLECTION
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a refined topographic base map of the project area described in
the PROJECT limits section of this contract using GIS data, and existing base mapping information
provided by the CITY.
The CITY and WSDOT will provide useable transportation data and analysis files to the
CONSULTANT for review. A single background studies coordination meeting between the CITY and
CONSULTANT shall be conducted to evaluate previously developed information and alternatives to
be evaluated as part of the feasibility study PROJECT.
The CONSULTANT will base all analysis off traffic counts collected in prior studies under pre-COVID-
19 conditions.
The CONSULTANT shall query crash data for the last five years available from WSDOT. The
CONSULTANT will review and summarize the existing crash data, comparing against statewide
averages for similar facilities.
2.2 SUPPORT TEAMS
Page 37 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 8
2.2.1 EXECUTIVE TEAM
The CONSULTANT shall assist the City in establishing an executive support team. The executive
support team will be active throughout the access revision process. The primary duty of the
Executive Team is to interpret policy and set direction for their representatives involved in the
technical support team. The representatives will be signees on the deliverables that are required
throughout the access revision process. The executive support team meets to monitor the progress
of the deliverables.
Due to the scalability of the process, the Executive Team will include the following individuals:
• FHWA Safety and Geometric Design Engineer
• Region Representatives (Assistant Regional Administer, Traffic Engineer, Local Programs
Engineer, Environmental Manager, and/or Planning Manager)
• WSDOT Assistant State Design Engineer
• WSDOT HQ Traffic
• Local agency representatives from the City of Pasco, Benton-Franklin Council of Governments
(BFCG), Ben-Franklin Transit (BFT), and Franklin County
Assumption(s)
• Executive Team meetings will be held via video conferencing
• The CONSULTANT will provide the meeting materials and record meeting minutes
Meeting(s)
• Maximum of three (3) Executive Team meetings through Phase 1 of the project.
Deliverable(s)
• Meeting agendas, notification, facilitation, and summaries for up to three (3) meetings (one
electronic copy)
2.2.2 TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE SUPPORT
The CONSULTANT shall assist the City in establishing a Technical Advisor Committee (TAC), which
will provide technical review and guidance on the detailed analyses required throughout the access
revision process. The TAC will meet regularly to ensure deliverables and project details are
coordinated across disciplines. A subgroup of the TAC may also conduct separate meetings to
coordinate specific details. The TAC will review the results and conclusions developed by the
CONSULTANT and the City prior to submittal to the executive support team for review and
approval.
The Executive Team will work with the City and the CONSULTANT to ensure the right personnel are
on the TAC. The TAC members may include representation from the following groups:
• BFCG staff
• FHWA (Area Engineer, Environmental Program Manager, and/or ITS Engineer)
Page 38 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 9
• WSDOT South Central Region (planning, design, environmental, maintenance, and traffic)
• WSDOT HQ Multimodal Development & Delivery
• City development services and public works representatives
• City and State Multimodal specialists (transit, bike, and/or pedestrian)
• Other identified stakeholders/partners
Assumption(s)
• TAC meetings will be held via video conferencing
• The CONSULTANT will provide the meeting materials and record meeting minutes
Meeting(s)
• Maximum of four (4) TAC Team meetings through the ARR phase of the project.
Deliverable(s)
• Meeting agendas, notification, facilitation, and summaries for up to four (4) meetings (one
electronic copy)
2.2.3 PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
The CONSULTANT shall present findings from the most recent relevant planning studies to the
Executive Team and form a project Purpose and Need Statement. The CONSULTANT shall then
create a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City, WSDOT, FHWA, and all other
members of the Executive Team agreeing to move directly to the Access Revision Report,
bypassing the Non-Access Feasibility Study. If the Executive Team requires a Non-Access
Feasibility Study, this scope must be amended to complete that new task.
Deliverable(s)
• DRAFT Purpose and Need Statement
• FINAL Purpose and Need Statement
• DRAFT Non-Access Feasibility Study Memorandum of Understanding
• FINAL Non-Access Feasibility Study Memorandum of Understanding
2.2.4 BFCG AND PARTNER AGENCY COORDINATION
Throughout the ARR process, the CONSULANT shall coordinate on a monthly basis with BFCG staff.
These monthly check-in meetings will be limited to 30 minutes and attended by the CONSULTANT
project manager, select BFCG staff, and CITY staff as needed.
In addition, the CONSULTANT shall host bi-weekly 30 minute check-in meetings with key WSDOT
traffic analysis staff throughout the duration of the project. These meetings will be attended by the
CONSULTANT project manager, an additional CONSULTANT team member, select CITY staff, and
select WSDOT staff.
Page 39 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 10
Deliverable(s)
• Monthly BFCG 30-minute check-in video conference meetings led and hosted by the
CONSULANT and attended by one CONSULTANT team member
• Bi-monthly WSDOT 30-minute check-in video conference meetings led and hosted by the
CONSULANT and attended by two CONSULTANT team members
2.3 METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS
The CONSULTANT shall create a methods and assumptions (M&A) document that establishes the
methods followed and assumptions made for the Access Revision Report. The M&A document will
include the following:
• Team Participants
• Scalability
• Planning Linkage
• Environmental Linkage
• Community Engagement
• Alternative Selection
• Traffic Operational Analysis Scope and Scale
• Safety Performance Analysis Scope and Scale
• Identify and Record Assumptions
• Change Management
The M&A document will contain a signature page for concurrence by the executive support team.
Deliverable(s)
• TAC Draft Methods and Assumptions Memorandum
• Executive Team Draft Methods and Assumptions Memorandum
• Final Signed Methods and Assumptions Memorandum
2.4 ACCESS REVISION REPORT
The CONSULTANT will build upon the prior interchange analysis conducted by DKS Associates as
part of a separate contract. The ARR analysis will include reasonable alternatives that consider
revisions in freeway access as well as non-access improvements that are carried forward from prior
planning efforts. The analysis is anticipated to include but not be limited to:
• A minimum of the first adjacent existing interchange to the east of the I-182/Broadmoor
Boulevard interchange
• The crossroads and the local street network, including the first major intersection on either side
of the I-182/Broadmoor Boulevard interchange
o Safety performance
o Operational impacts
Page 40 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 11
o Active Transportation impacts
• A description and assessment of the impacts and ability of the proposed changes at the I-
182/Broadmoor Boulevard interchange to collect, distribute, and accommodate traffic on the
freeway facility, ramps, intersection of ramps with Broadmoor Boulevard (Broadmoor Boulevard)
and the local street network
The ARR will include the following sections:
• Reasonable Alternatives
• Operational Analysis
• Safety Performance Analysis
• Conceptual Signing Plan
In addition, the ARR will include coordination with project stakeholder and support teams through
meetings at key junctures in the process.
2.4.1 MEETINGS
Throughout the ARR process the CONSULANT shall facilitate meetings with the Support Teams
established in Section 2.2.
• Up to three (3) meetings shall be held with the CITY, which shall be approximately 1 hour in
duration, assuming on-line meetings. These shall be attended by the CONSULTANT project
manager and four additional team members.
• Up to three (3) meetings shall be held with the TAC, which shall be approximately 2 hours in
duration, assuming on-line meetings. These shall be attended by the CONSULTANT project
manager and four additional team members. These meetings are covered in Task 2.2.2.
• Up to two (2) meetings shall be held with the Executive Team, which shall be approximately 1
hour in duration, assuming on-line meetings. These shall be attended by the CONSULTANT
project manager and four additional team members. These meetings are covered in Task 2.2.1.
• The CONSULTANT shall provide meeting notes for meetings held with WSDOT and submit those
to the CITY for review.
2.4.2 ALTERNATIVES SELECTION
The alternatives selection process shall follow the screening process outlined in Section 5 to include
the Reasonable Alternatives in the ARR. All the alternatives evaluated under Section 5 of this scope
will be reported by the CONSULTANT in the Reasonable Alternatives portion of the ARR document.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Alternatives considered in the ARR shall be limited to the alternatives considered in Section 5
(Alternatives Analysis and Evaluation) of this scope of work
2.4.3 OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
The operations analysis will build off the prior analysis performed by DKS associates at the
interchange, and any analysis performed under the Section 2 (Non-Access Feasibility Study)
portion of this scope of work. The CONSULTANT will update and refine methods and assumptions
developed in Section 2.2 per the direction of the TAC and Executive Team. The analysis of the
Page 41 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 12
alternatives will include the operational performance measures required to meet the ARR
requirements as well as quantitative active transportation measures to assess the operational
benefits for all modes of travel. The software tools used to the operational analysis will be defined
in the updated methods and assumptions document and may include Synchro/SimTraffic, Vissim,
Sidra, and HCS.
As part of the Access Revision analysis, the CONSULTANT will confirm that the appropriate
intersection control is selected for the I-182 ramp terminals at Broadmoor Boulevard per WSDOT
DM 1300, meeting the WSDOT Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) requirements.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Formal channelization and Intersection Plans for approval will be developed during the
subsequent design phase
• Intersections north and south of the interchange as well as I-182 east and west may need to be
built into the analysis model to fully capture the expected operations of this interchange
• The BFCG year 2045 regional future traffic demand model volumes will be post-processed per
NCHRP 765 procedures to estimate the expected future year volumes for this interchange
project
2.4.4 SAFETY PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
The CONSULTANT will conduct a safety performance analysis of all the baseline and reasonable
alternatives under consideration per Chapter 321 of the WSDOT Design Manual and Section 8.1 of
the WSDOT Safety Analysis Guide. The CONSULTANT shall provide figures and narrative discussing
and comparing the safety of each alternative included in the ARR. The figures are anticipated to
include but not be limited to:
• Conflict points
• Collision heat maps
In addition, the CONSULTANT will perform predictive Highway Safety Manual (HSM) analysis for
each alternative under consideration to support the selection of a preferred alternative.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Safety analysis will include “HSM - Part D” for each alternative
2.4.5 CONCEPTUAL SIGNING PLAN
The CONSULTANT shall develop a conceptual plan of the type and location of the signs proposed
for the preferred alternative to support the Access Revision Report. The conceptual plan may
include both regulatory or warning signs and guide signs due to the channelization issues on
Broadmoor Boulevard and at the I-182 ramp terminals.
2.4.6 DOCUMENT ATION
Page 42 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 13
The CONSULTANT shall compile the Alternatives Analysis and Evaluation, Operational Analysis,
Safety Performance Analysis, and Conceptual Signing Plan into a draft report. This Draft ARR will
be first reviewed by the executive and technical support teams. After their review, the WSDOT
South Central Region will submit an electronic copy (in PDF format), including appendices, to the
Assistant State Design Engineer (ASDE) along with a cover memo requesting review. The ASDE will
respond in writing either with needed revisions or to request the final draft.
For the final submittal, the final ARR will be sent in PDF format to the ASDE. The WSDOT South
Central Region shall submit a memo to the appropriate ASDE requesting final approval of the ARR.
After ASDE concurrence, the ASDE shall submit the ARR to FHWA for approval.
ASSUMPTIONS
• The environmental documentation included in Section 7 of the scope of work is assumed to be
completed at the same time the ARR goes to FHWA for approval
• Allow for a 30-day FHWA review period
• For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that WSDOT shall review the document a maximum of
two times before it is finalized and provide one consolidated set of comments for each review.
After each review, as part of the next submittal, the CONSULANT shall prepare written
responses to each review comment indicating how and where the comment was addressed.
• Up to three submittals shall be required of the document before it is accepted by WSDOT. Each
revision shall be submitted to the CITY for review prior to submitting it to WSDOT for review.
DELIVERABLES
• The draft report and one (1) revision to the report for submittal to the CITY for review and
comment prior to submittal to WSDOT
• The draft report and up to two (2) revisions to the memorandum for submittal to WSDOT for
review and acceptance
• The CONSULTANT shall provide formal responses to comments received by the CITY and
WSDOT, which shall be included in subsequent revisions as applicable.
3 BASIS OF DESIGN
The CONSULTANT shall develop a Basis of Design for the project, which will document general
project information, project needs, context, and design controls. The Basis of design will comprise
of three main elements:
1. Summary of Regulatory Parameters (memo format)
2. Site Context Opportunities and Constraints (memo format)
3. WSDOT Basis of Design Form (form)
These three elements may be compiled into a single document, with a general introduction section.
This Basis of Design shall form the foundation for the development of project alternatives and the
final design of the preferred alternative.
Page 43 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 14
An initial draft of the Basis of Design shall be prepared early in the process and circulated to
WSDOT and the CITY for review. Comments from the review shall be updated in the document and
communicated to the project team. This form shall be finalized and included in the design report.
3.1 REGULATORY PARAMETERS
The CONSULTANT shall determine the regulatory parameters that shall be used for the design of
the project, summarized in a memorandum. Items include:
• Bridge and structures codes, advisories, and references
• Pedestrian and bicycle design guidelines, accessibility requirements
• Design loads
• Performance parameters (design speed, traffic volumes, vehicle types, safety requirements,
horizontal and vertical clearances, clear-zone)
• Materials
• Zoning, land use, and other planning documents
• City, State and regional design guidelines
• WSDOT Right-of-Way Manual
• Stormwater Codes (City, State)
• Environmentally critical area and wetland regulations
DELIVERABLES
• Technical memorandum summary of regulatory parameters that shall influence type, size, and
location of improvements.
3.2 SITE CONTEXT OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS
The CONSULTANT shall define the site opportunities and constraints that will determine the location
of the facilities for the project, summarized in a memorandum.
• Existing right-of-way and limited access boundaries (figure)
• Urban design character and planning influences (such as existing and planned land uses)
• Bicycle and pedestrian connectivity (concept figures)
• Land use opportunities
• Identification of context opportunities and constraints:
o Neighborhood character and connectivity
o Preliminary environmental considerations (water connections, soil, and habitat)
o Environmental constraints
DELIVERABLES
• Memorandum of site context opportunities that shall influence type, size, and location, including
opportunities and constraints.
Page 44 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 15
3.3 BASIS OF DESIGN DISCUSSION
The CONSULTANT shall conduct a workshop with the CITY and key stakeholders to discuss the
Basis of Design assumptions with the objective of confirming and prioritizing design goals,
objectives, criteria, and assumptions.
3.3.1 WORKSHOP
The CONSULTANT shall conduct one (1) workshop with the CITY to discuss assumptions for the
Basis of Design. The workshop shall be included as one of the meetings identified in Section 3.1.1.
3.3.2 STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS
The CONSULTANT shall attend and participate in meetings with key stakeholders, identified
through the stakeholder analysis process, to discuss assumptions for the Basis of Design. These
meetings shall be included in the meetings identified in Section 3.1.1.
DELIVERABLES
• Workshop and meeting agendas
• Workshop and meeting minutes
3.4 BASIS OF DESIGN DOCUMENT
The CONSULTANT shall create a document describing the Basis of Design for the project. The
document is to include the following information:
• Regulatory parameters
• Site context opportunities and constraints
• WSDOT Basis of Design Form
DELIVERABLES
• Draft Basis of Design document
• Responses to CITY review comments for the Basis of Design
• Final Basis of Design document
There are other design documents that will prepared in Phase 2 of this design contract, which will
be based on the preferred alternative. These documents may include:
• Channelization Plans for Approval
• WSDOT Design Analysis (including design exceptions & deviations if required)
• Design Parameters Forms
• Geotechnical Report
• Hydraulic Report
• Clear Zone Inventory
Page 45 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 16
• ADA Memorandum
• Intersection Control Evaluation
4 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION
The CONSULTANT shall develop ramp configuration, intersection geometry, and active
transportation alternatives supported by the Basis of Design. The alternative analysis and
evaluation process shall have the following three development steps:
• Step I: Screening Parameters
• Step II: Interchange Ramp Configuration and Intersection Geometry Alternatives
• Step III: Active Transportation Alternatives
4.1 STEP I: SCREENING PARAMETERS
The CONSULTANT shall work with the CITY to establish the screening parameters that shall be used
to assess and rank the various alternatives for the project. Screening parameters shall be defined
for each of the major components of the project, including the interchange ramp configuration,
intersection geometry, and active transportation improvements.
Alternatives shall be evaluated by a two-level screening process. The alternatives evaluated
through the screening process shall be limited as follows:
• Eastbound I-182 Ramp at Broadmoor Boulevard:
o Up to two (2) ramp configuration options
o Up to two (2) intersection geometry alternatives (roundabout versus modified signal)
• Westbound I-182 Ramp at Broadmoor Boulevard:
o No Ramp new ramp configuration options
o Up to two (2) intersection geometry alternatives (roundabout versus modified signal)
• Active Transportation Alternatives
o Up to three (3) active transportation improvement options on Broadmoor Boulevard through
the I-182 interchange, including a separate pedestrian overcrossing
The screening matrix shall be used to narrow the alternatives to a final preferred alternative
selection. The matrix shall remain the same to provide a consistent measurement tool, as the
alternatives are refined to meet the overall goals and objectives defined by the screening process.
DELIVERABLES
• Draft screening matrix to be used for the evaluation of the interchange ramp configuration and
active transportation alternatives
• Final screening matrix
Page 46 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 17
4.2 STEP II: INTERCHANGE RAMP CONFIGURATION AND INTERSECTION
G EOMETRY ALTERNATIVES
For each alternative, horizontal and vertical alignments will be established, and a conceptual
grading model will be created to determine earthwork volumes and construction limits. Conceptual
channelization plans will be prepared, approximate extents of structural impacts to the bridge
structure will be established if applicable, and preliminary cost estimates will be generated.
Constructability and maintenance of traffic challenges will be identified for each alternative.
4.2.1 LEVEL 1 SCREENING—INTERCHANGE RAMP CONFIGURATION AND
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT
The CONSULTANT shall work with the CITY to develop two (2) ramp configuration alternatives at
the I-182 and Broadmoor Boulevard eastbound ramps, and two (2) intersection geometry
alternatives each at the eastbound and westbound I-182 and Broadmoor Boulevard ramp
terminals. Preliminary concepts for each ramp terminal address the following elements:
• Conceptual alignment and corridor footprint
• Vertical alignment challenges
• Identification of major utility impacts
• Potential right-of-way needs
• Non-motorized connectivity opportunities
• Truck and vehicle access
The ramp and intersection alternatives to be studied may include but are not limited to:
• Geometric modifications to the existing signalized intersections
• Roundabouts
• A new eastbound I-182 loop off-ramp separating the eastbound left turn from the eastbound
right turn
ASSUMPTIONS
• Two (2) Eastbound I-182 ramp configuration alternatives developed by the CONSULTANT
• Two (2) Broadmoor Boulevard and Eastbound I-182 ramp terminal intersection geometry
alternatives developed by the CONSULTANT
• Two (2) Broadmoor Boulevard and Westbound I-182 ramp terminal intersection geometry
alternatives developed by the CONSULTANT
• Three (3) Active Transportation Alternatives for the I-182 and Broadmoor Boulevard interchange
developed by the CONSULTANT
DELIVERABLES
• Schematic-level interchange alternatives plan and profile sketched over basemap aerial
• Screening matrix results for each alternative
Page 47 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 18
• Two (2) ramp configuration, four (4) intersection geometry, and three (3) active transportation
alternatives will be prepared on 11x17 sheets and submitted to the CITY (PDF).
4.2.2 LEVEL 2 SCREENING— INTERCHANGE RAMP CONFIGURATION AND
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY ALTERNATIVES REFINEMENT
The objective of the Level 2 Screening is to reduce the interchange ramp configuration and
intersection geometry alternatives from six (6) separate alternatives to a cohesive set of three (3)
solutions (one eastbound ramp configuration, one eastbound ramp terminal geometry, and one
westbound ramp terminal geometry) comprising a preferred alternative. For each alternative, a
horizontal and vertical alignment will be established, and a finished grade model will be created to
determine earthwork volumes and construction limits. Conceptual channelization plans will be
prepared, and preliminary cost estimates will be generated. Constructability and maintenance of
traffic challenges will be identified for each alternative.
Schematic-level figures will be created for the primary alternatives and are anticipated to include
the following elements:
• Horizontal alignments, curb lines and channelization
• Vertical alignments and finished grade surface models
• Right-of-way needs
• Utility impacts
• Preliminary stormwater management assessment
• Maintenance of traffic strategy
• Truck-turning movements
DELIVERABLES
• Illustrated memo with a description of the preferred alternative
• Screening matrix results for Level 2 Screening of each alternative
4.3 STEP III: ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES
4.3.1 LEVEL 1 SCREENING—ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES
DEVELOPMENT
The CONSULTANT shall work with the CITY to develop three (3) active transportation alternatives
for the I-182 Broadmoor Boulevard interchange, focusing on improving north-south connectivity
and pedestrian/cyclist safety. At minimum one of the alternatives will consider a new active
transportation only overpass of I-182 parallel to Broadmoor Boulevard.
DELIVERABLES
• Three (3) active transportation alternatives with preliminary evaluation, including screening
matrix results
Page 48 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 19
4.3.2 LEVEL 2 SCREENING— ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES
REFINEMENT
The objective of the Level 2 Screening is to reduce the active transportation alternatives from three
alternatives to the preferred alternative. This screening process will also provide input to the Level
2 Screening for the ramp configurations and intersection geometry alternatives under consideration
in Section 5.2.2, ensuring that the preferred active transportation alternative is fully compatible
with the preferred interchange alternative.
DELIVERABLES
• Illustrated memorandum with a description of the preferred active transportation alternative.
• Screening matrix results for Level 2 Screening of each alternative
4.4 ALTERNATIVES ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
The CONSULTANT shall develop conceptual costs for the components included in the alternatives
analysis. This shall include a conceptual level cost estimate for the entire project that would
consider items of significance, including constructability issues, traffic control, utility relocation,
temporary roadways, etc. Major cost items, such as HMA, concrete, and earthwork, will be
quantified using the CAD layouts and models for each alterative. Unit prices will be based on the
WSDOT Unit Bid Analysis.
Some items—such as drainage, signing and pavement marking, mobilization, etc.—shall be
estimated as a percentage of the construction cost. Cost estimates shall be developed with present
worth prices. The estimates shall also include a reasonable contingency, since the project at this
point shall only be at the conceptual stage.
ASSUMPTIONS
• Alternative costs for bridge modifications or new structures shall be based on structure costs per
square foot from WSDOT’s Bridge Design Manual, with necessary engineering judgment
documented.
• Roadway costs will be based on the WSDOT Unit Bid Analysis for key quantifiable items and will
use a percentage-based approach for unknown items.
DELIVERABLES
• Conceptual construction cost estimates of alternatives in MS Excel
5 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, AND PERMIT
COORDINATION
Widener and Associates, under a SUBCONSULTANT agreement with the CONSULTANT, will assist
the City in the preparation of environmental documentation and permitting of the project by
providing the following services under the subsequent tasks.
Page 49 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 20
5.1 DESIGN ASSISTANCE AND EARLY AGENCY COORDINATION
Early input into the formation of project alternatives will be provided to ensure each alternative
includes provisions to minimize impacts to the surrounding environment. This coordination within
the various design elements of the project will identify and incorporate minimization measures
early in the alternative development phase of the project and will ensure that an appropriate range
of alternatives are developed prior to the agency coordination.
The CONSULTANT, with assistance from Widener and Associates, will assist the City in presenting
the east west corridor alternatives to both the state and federal permitting agencies to identify the
regulatory issues associated with each alternative. Potential minimization measures for each
alternative will also be identified during the coordination with agency representatives. All
permitting issues and the recommended permitting process for the preferred alternative will be
documented in the project TS&L report.
It is assumed that this effort will be accomplished with the graphics and design drawings required
to complete the TS&L and to conduct the open houses and that no other special presentation
materials are required.
DELIVERABLES
• The CONSULTANT’s permitting specialist will prepare meeting minutes and memoranda
documenting the coordination activities with state and federal agencies, as required.
5.2 NOISE STUDY
The purpose of the Traffic Noise Report is to evaluate traffic noise levels at sensitive receptors near
the project that would be potentially affected by traffic noise and to identify potential mitigation
measures. If required by WSDOT or FHWA, the Traffic Noise Report will be developed in accordance
with the Washington State Department of Transportation's Environmental Procedures Manual.
1. Sound Level Measurements:
After review of the proposed project alternatives the CONSULTANT shall visit the project
area to identify potentially sensitive noise receivers and to take measurements of existing
sound levels. The CONSULTANT will measure existing noise levels during the peak hours to
be used in calibrating the noise model. Measurements will be undertaken in accordance
with WSDOT and FHWA guidelines and will be made with a Type 1 sound level meter.
During these measurements, sources of existing noise and topographical features will be
noted and traffic speeds and vehicle numbers and mix will be noted.
2. Construction Noise Impact Evaluation:
The noise analysis will evaluate potential short-term impacts of noise from construction
activities. Construction noise on nearby sensitive receptors will be evaluated based on
estimates published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of maximum noise
Page 50 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 21
levels of typical construction equipment in conjunction with simple distance attenuation.
Computer modeling of construction noise levels will not be performed.
3. Traffic Noise Impact Evaluation:
The CONSULTANT will evaluate traffic noise impacts using the FHWA Traffic Noise Model
(TNM) to estimate future traffic noise levels for the worst-case build alternative. The worst-
case scenario will be selected from among the build alternatives and will be chosen based
on expected future traffic volumes and the location of the alignment relative to sensitive
receivers. The noise modeling will predict PM peak-hour Leq noise levels from traffic at a
maximum of fifteen (15) receptor locations that could be affected by the proposed project
and will consider existing conditions and design year conditions. Modeling to calculate noise
contour lines is not included.
4. Mitigation Analysis:
The CONSULTANT will identify mitigation measures to reduce noise levels during
construction. If predicted long-term traffic noise levels from operation of the project would
cause noise impacts, mitigation measures will be developed in cooperation with the lead
agency and design engineers. Mitigation analysis, if required, will include evaluation of the
effectiveness and general size and location of natural and man-made noise barriers using
the TNM model.
DELIVERABLES
• A draft Traffic Noise Analysis Report for review by City with accompanying draft special
provisions if required.
• A draft Traffic Noise Analysis Report, incorporating the City’s comments, for submittal to
FHWA/WSDOT.
• A revised draft Traffic Noise Analysis Report, incorporating comments by FHWA/WSDOT, for
submittal for approval.
5.3 SECTION 106 REPORT (CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES)
This work would include the preparation of the project APE and the Section 106 report in
accordance with the State Historic Preservation Office standards and guidelines. If this work effort
is required by WSDOT or FHWA, it would include the following subtasks:
1. Pertinent literature on the archaeology, ethnography, and history of the project area will be
reviewed to determine the existence of archaeological sites and to refine the probability of
archaeological resources and traditional cultural places in the project areas.
2. The CONSULTANT will maintain contact with the local tribes for any information on historic
Indian use of the project area.
3. A systematic field reconnaissance will be conducted to identify previously recorded and/or
unrecorded archaeological sites for the proposed project where ground-disturbing activities are
Page 51 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 22
expected to take place. Field reconnaissance will consist of the traverse of pedestrian transects
at varying intervals, depending on terrain throughout the proposed project area. Shovel probes
(digging a hole with a shovel) will be excavated, as deep as feasible, and in areas expected to
have a high probability for cultural resources. Shovel probes will be augmented through auger
probes to explore the deepest possible deposits. Shovel probes will be screened in highly
probable areas and in soil matrixes too dense to identify small chipping debris.
4. All new sites will be mapped, photographed, and recorded on Washington State Archeological
Inventory forms and submitted to the state Office of Archeological and Historic Preservation
(OAHP) for Smithsonian numbers. Every effort will be made to include Tribal cultural resources
personnel in assisting the field effort. Rights-of-entry will be provided by the City.
DELIVERABLES
• Draft APE
• Final APE
• Draft Section 106 Report
• Revised draft Section 106 report incorporating City comments.
• Final Section 106 report incorporating WSDOT comments.
5.4 BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT – NO EFFECT LETTER
If required by WSDOT or FHWA, a Biological Assessment (BA) will be prepared for the preferred
alternative in accordance with WSDOT guidelines. The following subtasks will be undertaken in
preparation of the project BA:
1. Collect available documentation concerning the project activities and pertinent biological
information. Biological information will include priority habitat and species data from the
Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife along with rare plant and high-quality
ecosystem data from WDNR. This information will be reviewed, and a consultation strategy
will be developed.
2. Initiate informal consultation with United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries by preparing
written requests for lists of endangered, threatened, proposed, and candidate species.
3. Conduct a field reconnaissance to investigate on-site habitat conditions.
4. Make telephone contact with the appropriate resource agency staff for input on species
occurrence, habitat use, and potential project impacts.
5. Prepare a draft BA addressing listed species, proposed species, candidate species, species of
concern, and critical habitat. The BA will include a project description, a list of species, a
description of the species and their habitat, an analysis of project effects, and mitigation
recommendations.
Page 52 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 23
6. Provide the draft BA to the City for review and approval.
7. Revise the BA, as appropriate, and submit the final BA to USFWS and NOAA Fisheries for
their review, possible negotiation of mitigation measures, and concurrence.
8. Concurrent with Endangered Species Act (ESA) consultation, the CONSULTANT will
coordinate with NOAA Fisheries to meet essential fish habitat (EFH) requirements under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), as amended 1996. In
doing so, the CONSULTANT will provide NOAA Fisheries with the BA and a cover letter
requesting the initiation of consultation, stating the effect determination(s), reasoning
behind them, and proposed mitigation measures if any.
9. If NOAA Fisheries responds with advisory EFH conservation recommendations, the
CONSULTANT will coordinate with the City and FHWA to jointly discuss the
recommendations.
10. Formally address and respond to NOAA Fisheries’ recommendations within the regulated
time frame.
DELIVERABLES
• Draft BA for review by City with accompanying draft special provisions if required.
• Revised Draft BA, incorporating the City’s comments, for submittal to WSDOT.
• Revised Final BA, incorporating comments by WSDOT.
5.5 ENV IRONMENTAL JUSTICE SURVEY
If required by WSDOT or FHWA, the following services may be provided by the CONSULTANT to
complete an environmental justice (EJ) analysis includes the following main components:
1. Collecting demographic data for the project area using local data sources and the US Census
Data.
2. Identifying any environmental justice populations in the area (minority or low-income
populations).
3. Review public outreach activities to ensure potential EJ populations are offered an
opportunity to participate in project planning and decision-making.
4. Identifying any potential disproportionate effects to EJ populations from project activities
and identifying how impacts could not be avoided or minimized and what mitigation
measures could be implemented.
DELIVERABLES
• Draft EJ documentation will be provided.
• Revised Final EJ documentation will be provided incorporating City comments.
Page 53 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 24
• Final EJ documentation will be provided incorporating WSDOT comments.
5.6 LAND USE REPORT
If required by WSDOT or FHWA, the CONSULTANT will prepare the Land Use Discipline Report that
complies with chapter 450 of the Environmental Procedures Manual. A Land Use Discipline Report
is needed when there is a probability that the project will have more than a moderate effect on the
land use within the project area as a result of any direct, indirect, or cumulative land use impacts,
despite any proposed mitigation.
The CONSULTANT will evaluate existing conditions in the project area; summarize the existing land
uses, planned land uses, and zoning, shoreline environment and critical area designations, and
development trends in the study area. Widener will evaluate impacts and summarize any direct,
indirect, and cumulative land use impacts of the project and indicate whether the project is likely to
have more than a moderate effect on land use in the study area. The CONSULTANT will ensure
consistency with Land Use Plans and Implementing Regulations and summarize the analysis of
consistency with land use plans and implementing regulations, including City-wide planning
policies. Widener will look at mitigation and summarize any mitigation and enhancement measures
identified for addressing the direct and indirect land use impacts of the project and reconciling any
inconsistencies with land use plans and implementing regulations.
DELIVERABLES
• Draft 4f Statement for review by City
• Revised Draft Land Use Report incorporating City comments
• Final Land Use Report will be prepared incorporating FHWA/WSDOT comments
5.7 PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL LINKAGE REPORT
The CONSULTANT will prepare a Planning and Environmental Linkage Report that will document the
project decision making process. This report will eliminate the need for any further NEPA
alternative analysis.
DELIVERABLES
• Draft Report Environmental Linkage Report for review by City
• Revised Draft Environmental Linkage Report incorporating City comments
• Final Environmental Linkage Report incorporating WSDOT comments.
5.8 NEPA CE
Services will be provided to prepare the Environmental Classification Summary (ECS) form by
reviewing technical reports related to the project, applying project-specific data to the form, and
coordinating approval for the project by both WSDOT and FHWA.
DELIVERABLES
Page 54 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 25
• Draft ECS will be provided.
• Final ECS documentation will be provided incorporating City comments.
• Final ECS documentation will be provided incorporating WSDOT.
5.9 SEPA
The CONSULTANT shall complete appropriate SEPA documentation including all needed studies,
modeling, and analysis in accordance with State Environmental Policy Act (RCW 43.21C) and SEPA
Rules (WAC 197-11). The CONSULTANT will coordinate with the Yakima Planning Department to
address comments on the SEPA Checklist and provide support for the SEPA process. The City
presently anticipates a SEPA Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance.
DELIVERABLES
• SEPA Checklist
• SEPA MDNS
6 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
6.1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN
The CONSULTANT shall develop a public involvement plan (PIP) that includes the following
elements.
• Public involvement goals (i.e., education on the project and environmental process, effective
stakeholder engagement), and public involvement schedule
• Target audiences (i.e., businesses, community groups, public agencies, Tribes, key
stakeholders, public officials, and broader public interests)
• Identify communication tactics and tools (newsletters, posters, interactive web site,
presentations, and media release content), including approaches to solicit input of those
traditionally underserved by transportation (environmental justice and Title VI populations)
• The procedures for acknowledging, considering, and responding to public comments
• Coordination with the City’s Communications Officer
• Demographic and behavioral analysis to ensue engagement of social economically diverse
populations
• Accommodations for translation and bilingual meeting facilitation
Assumption(s)
• CITY will respond to all media inquiries and serve as the public information officer for this
PROJECT
• CITY will provide input on targeted audiences
• The CITY will provide information on hand regarding minority and low-income communities, and
any known stakeholders from these communities that should be engaged in the design process
Page 55 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 26
CONSULTANT Deliverable(s)
• Draft PIP (electronic copy) (one review)
• Final PIP (electronic copy) (one review)
Deliverable(s)
• Minority and low-income population maps
6.2 IMPLEMENTATION
The Public Involvement Plan will use a multi-faceted approach, with a goal of engaging specific
stakeholders with an interest in the Transportation Impact Mitigation Fee Update. Information will
also be shared with the general public throughout the process via social media, news and other City
resources.
The CONSULTANT shall prepare materials subject to the CITY’S review including:
• Project Fact Sheet
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Presentations
• Social Media Content (3)
• News Releases (3)
• Development of a Social Pinpoint Site to capture comments (Spanish and English) in a
Google map format, to be hosted on the City’s website.
• Bilingual postcard mailer to all homes/businesses within a one-mile radius of the project
(approximately 2500).
The CITY shall plan for two virtual public open house meetings at key points in the project where
community feedback is needed. The focus of these open house will be first to gather input from
the community on the interchange needs and second to inform local residents, area businesses,
property owners, and the community at large of the project findings and alternatives and gather
input on the draft findings.
The CONSULTANT shall prepare graphics and text to facilitate the virtual meeting. The virtual
meeting shall solicit comments from the virtual meeting attendees. The CONSULTANT will prepare
a summary of the meeting including tabulation of the written comments received.
Assumption(s)
• The CONSULTANT will take the lead in preparing the virtual meeting.
• The CITY will take the lead in sending out emails, Facebook posts, and other media outreach to
inform interested parties about the virtual meeting.
Page 56 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 27
Deliverable(s)
• Maximum of four graphics for each virtual open house and a presentation (one draft and final)
6.3 COUNCIL WORK SESSIONS
CONSULTANT shall prepare for and attend up to three City County work sessions. These work
sessions can include the Planning Commission for a joint work session if desired by the CITY.
Assumption(s)
• Council work sessions will be held in Pasco, Washington.
• Depending on COVID-19 restrictions, the CONSULTANT may be required to attend these work
sessions remotely
Meeting(s)
• Maximum of three Council Work Sessions in Pasco.
Deliverable(s)
• Meeting agendas, notification, facilitation, and summaries for three meetings (one electronic
copy)
7 FUNDING STRATEGY
7.1 INITIAL FUNDING STRATEGY SUPPORT
The Funding Strategy task will be led by the CONSULTANT, providing the City guidance for
developing a methodology to re-coup a portion of the capital cost for the selected interchange
design from future development in the surrounding areas. This task will be activated upon the
approval of the ARR by WSDOT and FHWA and will include a memorandum summarizing the
funding strategy methods, a planning commission work session, and a City Council presentation.
Assumption(s)
• Planning Commission Work Session and Presentation to City Council will be held in Pasco,
Washington.
• Depending on COVID-19 restrictions, the CONSULTANT may be required to attend meetings
remotely
Meeting(s)
• One Planning Commission Work Session in Pasco.
• One Presentation to City Council in Pasco.
Deliverable(s)
Page 57 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 28
• Meeting agendas, notification, facilitation, and summaries for one meeting (one electronic copy)
• Council Presentation (PowerPoint and pdf)
• Draft Funding Strategy Memorandum
• Final Funding Strategy Memorandum
Page 58 of 128
I -182 AND BROADMOOR BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PROJECT • DRAFT SCOPE OF WORK •
SEPTEMBER 7 , 2021 29
PHASE 2 – DESIGN
The design phase of this project shall begin during the Phase 1. Some tasks from Phase 2 likely to
be extended in Phase 2 include:
• Task 7 – Funding Strategy
Phase 2 is anticipated to include the following tasks:
• Topographic Survey and Right-of-Way Plan
• Geotechnical Research and Recommendations
• Hydraulic Analysis
• 30% PSE
• 60% PSE
• 90% PSE
• 100% PSE
• Bid Documents
Page 59 of 128
Task Total Cost
Task 1 - Project Management 63,379$
Task 2 - WSDOT Access Revision Report (ARR)122,240$
Task 3 - Basis of Design 84,555$
Task 4 - Alternatives Analysis and Evaluation 193,590$
Task 5 - Environmental Documentation,
Biological Assessment, and Permit Coordination $ 150,586
Task 6 - Public Involvement 52,428$
Task 7 - Funding Strategy 12,295$
Total 679,073$
&9)*#*5#
Page 60 of 128
PROJECT NAME:I-182/Road 100 Interchange Phase 1PROJECT #: 21292Date: 9/08/2021Principal-in-ChargeProject ManagerDeputy Project ManaDesign Project ManaTraffic Analysis LeadSafety LeadActive TransportatioPublic Involvement LSpanish Language SuFunding Strategy LeaTraffic Analysis EngiProject EngineerCreative ServicesProject AdministratoPrincipal-in-ChargeCivil ManagerCivil Designer (PE)Civil Designer (EIT)Civil CADStructural ManagerStructural Designer (Structural Designer (Structural CADProject AdministratoProject ManagerSenior BiologistProject BiologistBilling Rates$295.00 $185.00 $195.00 $230.00 $195.00 $255.00 $205.00 $245.00 $100.00 $240.00 $145.00 $145.00 $140.00 $135.00 195.22$ 181.72$ 167.44$ 115.36$ 110.46$ 201.94$ 182.28$ 115.36$ 110.46$ 70.00$ $170.40 $120.00 $86.80Task DescriptionTask 1 - Project Management228 42,370$ 3,000$ 118 15,009$ 3,000$ 0 -$ -$ 63,379$ 1.1 - Monthly Progress Reports and Billings3964224,260$ 183654 5,791$ 0-$ 10,051$ 1.2 - Project Administration62424409416,290$ 4424323,188$ 0-$ 19,478$ 1.3 - Project Schedule2164830 5,410$ 4481,508$ 0-$ 6,918$ 1.4 - Project Kick-Off2 12121212245611,300$ 3,000$ 2102 82244,523$ 3,000$ 0-$ 21,823$ 1.5 - Project Manager Check-ins41264265,110$ 0-$ 0-$ 5,110$ Task 2 - WSDOT Access Revision Report (ARR)692 118,010$ -$ 24 4,230$ -$ 0-$ -$ 122,240$ 2.1 - Background/Data Collection4820325,200$ 0-$ 0-$ 5,200$ 2.2 - Support Teams11 66 15 148619233,580$ 2461,033$ 0000-$ 34,613$ 2.3 - Methods and Assumptions241016325,600$ 4481,397$ 0-$ 6,997$ 2.4 - Access Revision Report9 30 39 4 75 18 2 187 24 40 843673,630$ 44 2101,801$ 0-$ 75,431$ Task 3 - Basis of Design200 39,000$ -$ 290 45,555$ -$ 0-$ -$ 84,555$ 3.1 - Regulatory Parameters441684238 8,170$ 16 40 16 4 16 810016,098$ 0000-$ 24,268$ 3.2 - Site Context Opportunities and Constraints2824816248215,190$ 16 24 24 10 4 8 4 69614,190$ 0-$ 29,380$ 3.3 - Basis of Design Discussion4102044485410,810$ 66 6183,307$ 0-$ 14,117$ 3.4 - Basis of Design Document248 48264,830$ 16 24 24 4 87611,961$ 0-$ 16,791$ Task 4 - Alternatives Analysis and Evaluation308 53,740$ -$ 950 139,850$ -$ 0-$ -$ 193,590$ 4.1 - Step I: Screening Parameters288 4426 5,430$ 4481,397$ 0-$ 6,827$ 4.2 - Step II: Interchange Ramp Terminal Configuration and Intersection Geometry Alternatives41616816848 2414024,580$ 8 42140180602440322455078,508$ 0-$ 103,088$ 4.3 - Step III: Active Transportation Alternatives442456 3612419,840$ 8 2464402432402424280 43,077$ 0000-$ 62,917$ 4.4 - Alternatives Estimated Project Costs421218 3,890$ 2 8 32 40 6 16 8112 16,868$ 0-$ 20,758$ Task 5 - Environmental Documentation, Biological Assessment, and Permit Coordination36 7,660$ -$ 0-$ -$ 1132 137,426$ 5,500$ 150,586$ 5.1 - Design Assistance and Early Agency Coordination48416 3,440$ 0-$ 120 40 1017026,116$ 29,556$ 5.2 - Noise Study0-$ 0-$ 42 100 9023226,969$ 26,969$ 5.3 - Section 106 Report0-$ 0-$ 10 16 26525,881$ 5,500.000$ 11,381$ 5.4 - Biologoical Assessment - No Effect Letter0-$ 0-$ 12 24 28647,355$ 7,355$ 5.5 - Environmental Justice Survey0-$ 0-$ 14 42 5411012,113$ 12,113$ 5.6 - Land Use Report0-$ 0-$ 60 70 92222 26,610$ 26,610$ 5.7 - Planning and Environmental Linkage Report488204,220$ 0-$36 40 70146 17,010$ 21,230$5.8 - NEPA CE0-$ 0-$ 10 24 4680 8,577$ 8,577$ 5.9 - SEPA0-$ 0-$ 16 18 2256 6,796$ 6,796$ Task 6 - Public Involvement204 34,420$ 10,000$ 42 8,008$ -$ 0-$ -$ 52,428$ 6.1 - Public Involvement Plan221216 3,900$ 0-$ 0-$ 3,900$ 6.2 - Implementation436 48 5614422,200$ 10,000$ 22 261,102$ 0-$ 33,302$ 6.3 - Council Work Sessions412412 1244 8,320$ 18 1836 6,906$ 0-$ 15,226$ Task 7 - Funding Strategy46 9,410$ -$ 22 2,885$ -$ 0-$ -$ 12,295$ 7.1 - Initial Funding Strategy Support2424 1646 9,410$ 241622 2,885$ 0-$ 12,295$ Total1714 304,610$ 13,000$ 1446 215,537$ 3,000$ 1132 137,426$ 5,500$ 679,073$ Total Cost by TaskDKSKPFFDKSTotal DKS Hours by TaskDKS Labor Cost by TaskDKS Other Direct Costs (ODC)Total KPFF Hours by TaskKPFF Labor Cost by TaskKPFF Other Direct Costs (ODC)Widener AssociatesKPFFWidener AssociatesTotal Widener Associates Hours by TaskWidener Associates Labor Cost by TaskWidener Associates Other Direct Costs (ODC)Page 61 of 128
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 9, 2021
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/13/21
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Proposed Sewer Local Improvement Districts (LID)s in New Urban
Growth Area
I. REFERENCE(S):
PowerPoint Presentation
Exhibit A - Technical Memorandum Sewer LID Breakout
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The preliminary construction costs for the proposed improvements are estimated
based on costs of similar recently constructed sewer projects in the Pacific
Northwest and are presented in 2021 dollars. The costs are at the planning level
and based on a conceptual alignment and cooperation from the property owners
relating to easements, etc.
West UGA Expansion LID: $11,105,000.00
East UGA Expansion LID: $19,900,000.00
NOTE: These amounts exclude Right of Way acquisition costs and LD
administration and financing costs.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City anticipates that the area recently included in the expanded UGA west
of the Tri Cities Airport and north of Burns Road will be under considerable
pressure from development over the coming years. The subject area is
illustrated in Figure 1 in the attached Exhibit A. To achieve the densities
provided for in the recently adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan, meet the
population target the City is mandated to plan for under the Growth Management
Page 62 of 128
Act, and avoid substandard development and the sprawl goes with
underdeveloped area, extension of sanitary sewer in the area is necessary.
Development of large areas does not often occur in an orderly, one piece at a
time, fashion with roads, utilities and other public infrastructure and amenities
being developed and extended in a seamlessly as each property develops. As
one can see from a satellite view of Pasco, or any other community in transition,
the development of private property most often occurs sporadically when
circumstances for a particular property owner present themselves such that
development is their best option. And with few exceptions, larger parcels
develop much faster and more efficiently, than areas the have been partially
developed into 5 acre or less parcels which are more expensive to acquire,
require considerable effort to assemble, require razing or incorporate existing
structures and infrastructure substandard for suburban/urban densities, etc.
Further, as Pasco and countless other communities have experienced,
inconsistent and underdeveloped properties have an adverse impact on
municipal operations, increasing costs for maintenance of roads and
infrastructure, and have an adverse impact on emergency response times
impacting overall community safety.
While it is difficult for the City to regulate the orderly development property and
individual property owners within a particular area, from a policy standpoint the
City can influence the orderly development and discourage sporadic or under
development of the area(s) in question through the conditions surrounding the
extension of utilities, and in this case specifically, sanitary sewer through a Local
Improvement District (LID) or Utility Local Improvement District (ULID). A
property owner funded LID/ULID could finance the backbone of a sanitary sewer
conveyance system in a large area that could reach each large parcel and
assure densities necessary to meet the City's obligations under GMA and avoid
large swaths of underdeveloped properties and substandard streets and rights
of way within the cities recently added UGA and the problems this type of
development creates.
V. DISCUSSION:
In an attempt to be proactive and facilitate development within the subject areas
consistent with the recently adopted Comprehensive Plan, staff has been
exploring the alternatives to provide sanitary sewer service into these areas in a
comprehensive fashion rather than in a piecemeal fashion development by
development. In this effort staff has been meeting with major property owners
and their representatives to gauge support for the concept, which has thus far
been overwhelmingly positive.
Page 63 of 128
To assist us in the aforementioned effort, RH2 Engineering, Inc. was tasked to
complete an addendum to its Comprehensive Sewer Plan (CSP) in the form of
a technical memorandum providing a detailed analysis of the City’s expanded
Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary and how the subject area might logically
organized into future local improvement district (LID) areas based on projected
growth. The tech memo further evaluates sanitary sewer conveyance for the
area, developing a preliminary conveyance system to serve as a bac kbone for
these areas and a planning level construction cost estimate. The technical
memorandum will supplement the CSP which Figure 1 in the attached Exhibit
A illustrates the areas specifically evaluated as part of this analysis, with the
City’s proposed 20-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) improvements
shown in the figure as well for reference.
A presentation on this topic will be provided by City staff and RH2 Engineering
(consultant).
Page 64 of 128
Pasco City Council Workshop Meeting September 13, 2021Page 65 of 128
UGA Expansion Sewer System OverviewPage 66 of 128
West UGA Expansion LID AreaPage 67 of 128
East UGA Expansion LID AreaPage 68 of 128
UGA Expansion LID SummaryTwo LIDs: West and East UGA Expansion LIDsBenefits:Construct sewer main prior to other utilities and improvementsPromotes near-term development of properties in expanded UGAEnsures coordination among landowners and developersUnified plan for wastewater service in areaPage 69 of 128
9/2/2021 2:21 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\719-106\10 REPORTS\LID BREAKOUT\TM_LIDBREAKOUTANALYSIS.DOCX
TECHNICAL
MEMORANDUM
Signed: 09/02/2021 Signed: 09/02/2021
Background
The City of Pasco (City) has retained RH2 Engineering, Inc., (RH2) to complete an addendum to its
Comprehensive Sewer Plan (CSP). The City requested RH2 prepare a technical memorandum to
supplement the CSP that provides a detailed analysis of the City’s expanded Urban Growth Area
(UGA) boundary and how it might logically be broken out into future local improvement district
(LID) areas based on projected growth. Figure 1 shows the areas specifically evaluated as part of
this analysis, with the City’s proposed 20-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) improvements
shown in the figure as well for reference.
LID Delineation
The areas shown in Figure 1 were evaluated based on a variety of factors, including topography,
property ownership, and proximity to existing sewer infrastructure to identify two future LID
areas. These LID areas are shown in Figures 2 and 3, and are summarized as follows.
Client: City of Pasco
Project: Addendum to the Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Project File: PSC 719.106.01.0113 Project Manager: Ryan Withers, PE
Composed by: Ryan Withers, PE
Reviewed by: Paul Cross, PE
Subject: Expanded Urban Growth Area LID Breakout Analysis
Date: September 2, 2021
EXHIBIT A
Page 70 of 128
Technical Memorandum: Expanded Urban Growth Area LID Breakout Analysis
September 2, 2021
Page 2
9/2/2021 2:21 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\719-106\10 REPORTS\LID BREAKOUT\TM_LIDBREAKOUTANALYSIS.DOCX
West UGA Expansion LID
The West UGA Expansion LID includes an approximate 1,700-acre area west of Road 68.
Development within the West UGA Expansion LID is anticipated to require gravity main as large as
18-inch diameter at the downstream extent of the LID area, with 8-, 12-, and 15-inch-diameter
gravity sewer also planned within the LID area, as shown in Figures 1 and 2. A lift station is
anticipated to be required in the southwest portion of the area to pump wastewater from the
western portion of this LID area to the east to 21-inch-diameter gravity main proposed to be
installed as part of the development in the Barker Ranch property. The majority of the West UGA
Expansion LID area is anticipated to flow via gravity to 12- and 21-inch-diameter gravity main
proposed to be installed as part of the development in the Barker Ranch property.
East UGA Expansion LID
The East UGA Expansion LID includes an approximate 1,000-acre area east of Road 68, and an
approximate 150-acre area adjacent to Railroad Avenue.
The majority of this LID area, and specifically the west and central portions of this LID area, are
anticipated to require 12-inch-diameter gravity sewer main to convey wastewater to a proposed
East UGA Lift Station as shown in Figures 1 and 3. The entirety of the East UGA Lift Station flow is
planned to be conveyed to the east to Glade Road via 12- and 15-inch-diameter gravity sewer, as
shown in Figures 1 and 3. Analyses were performed to determine if this portion of the East UGA
Expansion LID area could be conveyed into the City’s existing collection system between Road 36
and Road 68, but the collection system’s downstream capacity is not sufficient to accommodate
the flows from this area.
The 150-acre area adjacent to Railroad Avenue is anticipated to require gravity main extending
from the southwest corner of the area, beneath the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, and
south on Glade Road to a proposed Glade Road Lift Station that is also necessary for the 1,000-
acre area between Road 36 and Road 68.
The force main downstream of the Glade Road Lift Station is anticipated to be conveyed to the
east beneath the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad with at least two long -term
connections to the City’s existing gravity collection system. A maximum of approximately
1,440 gpm (approximately 2.1 million gallons per day [MGD]) on a PHF basis can be conveyed
within the existing Industrial Way gravity sewer main without causing significant downstream
capacity deficiencies. Flows in excess of approximately 1,440 gpm on a PHF basis are
recommended to be conveyed east of US 395 along the alternate force main location shown in
Figures 1 and 3. The easterly force main connection at Capitol Avenue is capable of conveying
approximately 545 gpm on a PHF basis without the need for downstream gravity main or
Capitol Lift Station capacity improvements.
Flow Projections
The flows projected within each of the LID areas are shown in Table 1 for the City’s 10-year,
20-year, and build-out planning periods. Table 1 also summarizes the approximate year(s) that
development within each LID area may begin to occur based on City and RH2 conversations with
developers and landowners. The 10- and 20-year ERU and flow projections shown in Table 1 are
Page 71 of 128
Technical Memorandum: Expanded Urban Growth Area LID Breakout Analysis
September 2, 2021
Page 3
9/2/2021 2:21 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\719-106\10 REPORTS\LID BREAKOUT\TM_LIDBREAKOUTANALYSIS.DOCX
consistent with the City’s 2021 CSP. Build-out projections in the West UGA Expansion LID are
based on an additional 20-percent growth beyond the City’s 20-year planning period for
residential areas. Build-out projections in the East UGA Expansion LID are based on a combined
3.0 MGD, consistent with the downstream capacity of the existing gravity main in Industrial Way
and Capitol Avenue.
Table 1: Expanded UGA LID Area Flow Projections
Proposed Wastewater Infrastructure
Future wastewater infrastructure within each of the expanded UGA LID areas that is
recommended to be considered for incorporation into a future LID is summarized in the following
sections.
West UGA Expansion LID
Figure 2 shows the proposed West UGA Expansion LID infrastructure locations and invert
elevations, as well as the area within the LID capable of flowing into the proposed improvements
via gravity to the proposed Dent Road Lift Station or directly to the Barker property, based on
existing ground elevations. A summary of the proposed infrastructure is as follows.
• Gravity Collection System: Primarily 12 and 15 inches in diameter with slopes between
0.22 and 0.90 percent for the proposed gravity main shown in Figure 2. Gravity main
within future development that is not shown in Figure 2 is recommended to be 8 inches in
diameter with slopes between 0.60 and 1.00 percent. Gravity main upstream of the Dent
Road Lift Station is recommended to be 8-inch diameter with slopes between 0.50 and
1.10 percent.
• Lift Station: Duplex lift station with 300 gpm firm capacity (based on approximately 600
ERUs upstream of the lift station).
• Force Main: 6-inch diameter (approximately 3.4 fps based on 300 gpm firm capacity).
• Phasing: Unlikely to be applicable within the LID area flowing via gravity through the
Barker property. For the area upstream of the Dent Road Lift Station, if 200 or more
homes are planned for development as part of initial construction, no significant phasing
is recommended. If less than 200 homes are anticipated for an extended period of time
following construction of the Dent Road Lift Station, the City is recommended to evaluate
installing pumps with a reduced capacity to be utilized until more development occurs.
ERUs
ADF
(gpm)
PHF
(gpm)ERUs
ADF
(gpm)
PHF
(gpm)ERUs
ADF
(gpm)
PHF
(gpm)
West UGA Expansion LID 1,350 2023 to 2024 1,203 208 466 4,305 743 1,666 5,166 892 2,000
East UGA Expansion LID 1,150 2023 to 2024 1,710 295 662 3,771 651 1,460 5,382 929 2,083
LID Area
10-Year Projections 20-Year Projections Build-Out Projections
Approximate
Year of
Development
Area
(acres)
Page 72 of 128
Technical Memorandum: Expanded Urban Growth Area LID Breakout Analysis
September 2, 2021
Page 4
9/2/2021 2:21 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\719-106\10 REPORTS\LID BREAKOUT\TM_LIDBREAKOUTANALYSIS.DOCX
East UGA Expansion LID
Figure 3 shows the proposed East UGA Expansion LID infrastructure locations and invert
elevations, as well as the area within the LID capable of flowing into the proposed improvements
via gravity based on existing ground elevations. A summary of the proposed infrastructure is as
follows.
• Gravity Collection System: 12- and 15-inch diameter with slopes between 0.40 and 1.25
percent for the proposed gravity main shown in Figure 3. Gravity main within future
development that is not shown in Figure 3 is recommended to be 8 or 12 inches in
diameter with slopes between 0.60 and 1.00 percent (as needed for individual buildings or
facilities within the development). Portions of the LID area are anticipated to be capable
of flow by gravity directly to the Glade Road Lift Station, and the eastern portion of the
LID area is anticipated to be pumped by the East UGA Lift Station, upstream of the Glade
Road Lift Station. This area is shown with bright green fill in Figure 3. The area shown in
blue in Figure 3 represents area that may be capable of flowing by gravity to either the
East UGA or the Glade Road Lift Stations depending on proposed grading, phasing, or
timing of development within this LID. Some gravity main shown in this LID area, and
specifically the gravity main outside of the City’s UGA boundary near Roberta Road and
Road 36, may be eliminated pending proposed grading of future development in the
property currently owned by Farm 2005, LLC, as shown in Figure 3.
• Lift Station:
o The East UGA Lift Station is recommended to be a duplex or triplex lift station with
approximately 500 to 700 gpm firm capacity (20-year capacity), based on
approximately two-thirds of the East UGA Expansion LID flowing by gravity to the
proposed lift station. Capacity of the lift station is dependent on proposed grading
within the development area, and is recommended to be re-evaluated during the
platting process and predesign phase for the future development. A phased
approach to gradually increase pumping capacity of the lift station may be
necessary based on the timing of development within the LID.
o The Glade Road Lift Station is recommended to be a triplex or quadplex lift station.
The near-to-medium-term firm capacity requirement of this lift station is
approximately 2.0 MGD, inclusive of approximately 1.1 MGD from the
development in the bright green, dark green, and blue filled areas shown in
Figure 3, and approximately 0.9 MGD from the development in the orange filled
area shown in Figure 3. If the areas west of the Glade Road Lift Station are
anticipated to convey significant flows to the lift station within approximately
1 year of lift station construction completion, either three 1.0 MGD pumps are
recommended for installation or two 1.5 MGD pumps. In either case, provisions
are recommended to be installed for one additional identical pump to be installed
within the wet well in the future as necessitated by future flows.
If timing of the areas west of the Glade Road Lift Station anticipated to be more
than 1 year beyond the completion of the proposed Glade Road Lift Station, the
Page 73 of 128
Technical Memorandum: Expanded Urban Growth Area LID Breakout Analysis
September 2, 2021
Page 5
9/2/2021 2:21 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\719-106\10 REPORTS\LID BREAKOUT\TM_LIDBREAKOUTANALYSIS.DOCX
original construction of the lift station is recommended to include two 1.0 to
1.2 MGD pumps with provisions for two additional 1.0 MGD pumps in the future,
or one 1.5 MGD pump with provisions for two additional 1.5 MGD pumps in the
future.
The Glade Road Lift Station is recommended to be designed to accommodate a
future firm pumping capacity of 3.0 MGD, consistent with the downstream
capacity remaining in the gravity main within Industrial Way and Capitol Avenue.
• Force Main:
o For the East UGA Lift Station with up to a 700 gpm firm capacity, an
8-inch-diameter force main is recommended (approximately 4.5 fps). Based on
proposed grading and development density, the proposed lift station may serve
1,300 ERUs (500 gpm) or less, resulting in a 6-inch-diameter force main being
sufficient. Force main sizing is recommended to be confirmed during the platting
process and predesign phase for the future development as additional information
regarding the lift station capacity is known. No temporary connection of the East
UGA Lift Station is recommended in the vicinity of the City’s Three Rivers or
Madison Park Lift Station basins.
o Two parallel force mains are likely necessary downstream of the Glade Road Lift
Station, with sizing depending on the timing and phasing of the upstream
developments. Viable force main combinations include parallel 8- and 12-inch-
diameter force mains, or two parallel 10-inch-diameter force mains. Force main
sizing is recommended to be confirmed during the platting process and predesign
phase for the future development as additional information regarding the lift
station capacity and development timing is known.
• Phasing: A phased improvement approach may be recommended for this LID, depending
on the timing of development for properties within the lift station basin. Coordination
with landowners and developers is recommended during the platting process and
predesign phase of this development to identify the phased approach best suited for this
LID.
ESTIMATING COSTS OF IMPROVEMENTS
Project costs for the proposed improvements were estimated based on costs of similar recently
constructed sewer projects in the Pacific Northwest and are presented in 2021 dollars. The unit
costs for each pipe size are based on estimates of construction-related improvements, such as
materials and labor for installation, services, manholes, connections to the existing system,
trench restoration, asphalt surface restoration, and other work for a complete installation.
Project cost estimates for sewer pipe projects were determined from the unit costs (i.e., cost
per foot-length) shown in Tables 2 and 3, and the proposed diameter and approximate length
of each improvement. The gravity sewer main costs shown in Tables 2 and 3 include a
reduction of costs from those shown in the City’s CSP to remove significant roa dway-related
construction that is not anticipated in the majority of the largely undeveloped (or
Page 74 of 128
Technical Memorandum: Expanded Urban Growth Area LID Breakout Analysis
September 2, 2021
Page 6
9/2/2021 2:21 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\719-106\10 REPORTS\LID BREAKOUT\TM_LIDBREAKOUTANALYSIS.DOCX
underdeveloped) LID areas analyzed in this technical memorandum. The reduction in unit costs
compared to the City’s CSP include reduced select backfill, no asphalt overlay, no crushed
surfacing top course, reduced traffic control, and a reduced number of sewer laterals given that
the gravity main shown in this analysis is primarily trunk main . The indirect costs shown in
Tables 2 and 3 are estimated at 35 percent of the construction cost for engineering preliminary
design, final design, construction contract administration, project administration, permitting,
and legal and administrative services, consistent with the indirect cost calculations in the City’s
2021 CSP.
Table 2
Gravity Sewer Pipe Unit Costs
Table 3
Force Main Unit Costs
The cost estimates presented in this section include the estimated project cost of the
improvement, including 8.6 percent sales tax. The cost estimates do not include costs
associated with ROW or easement acquisition.
Planning-level project cost estimates for the wastewater system improvements in each LID are
summarized in Table 4. For LIDs recommended to have phased improvements, the project cost
estimates are based on the final phase of improvements, representing the recommended
capacity of the improvements at or beyond the City’s 20-year planning period.
Sewer Main
Diameter
(inches)
Construction Cost
per Linear Foot
(2021 $ per LF)
Indirect Cost per
Linear Foot
(2021 $ per LF)
Project Cost per
Linear Foot
(2021 $ per LF)
8 $206 $72 $278
12 $237 $83 $320
15 $243 $85 $327
18 $276 $96 $372
Force Main
Diameter
(inches)
Construction Cost
per Linear Foot
(2021 $ per LF)
Indirect Cost per
Linear Foot
(2021 $ per LF)
Project Cost per
Linear Foot
(2021 $ per LF)
6 $81 $28 $109
8 $89 $31 $121
10 $98 $34 $133
12 $108 $38 $145
Page 75 of 128
Technical Memorandum: Expanded Urban Growth Area LID Breakout Analysis
September 2, 2021
Page 7
9/2/2021 2:21 PM \\CORP.RH2.COM\DFS\PROJECTS\DATA\PSC\719-106\10 REPORTS\LID BREAKOUT\TM_LIDBREAKOUTANALYSIS.DOCX
Table 4
LID Project Cost Estimates
Attachments:
Figure 1 – UGA Expansion Landowner Overview
Figure 2 – Gravity Sewer Contribution Basins West UGA Expansion LID
Figure 3 – Gravity Sewer Contribution Basins East UGA Expansion LID
Description
8-inch Gravity Sewer 10,060 LF $278 $2,798,692
12-inch Gravity Sewer 17,650 LF $320 $5,640,940
15-inch Gravity Sewer 2,690 LF $327 $880,706
18-inch Gravity Sewer 785 LF $372 $292,020
Duplex Lift Station (500 gpm)1 1 LS $1,206,000 $1,206,000
6-inch Force Main 2,620 LF $109 $286,104
Rounded Totals ---------$11,105,000
12-inch Gravity Sewer 36,725 LF $320 $11,737,310
15-inch Gravity Sewer 8,355 LF $327 $2,735,427
East UGA Duplex Lift Station
(700 gpm)1 1 LS $1,765,000 $1,765,000
Glade Road Triplex Lift Station
(2,100 gpm)1 1 LS $2,324,000 $2,324,000
8-inch Force Main 8090 LF $121 $976,139
12-inch Force Main 2,490 LF $145 $361,866
Rounded Totals ---------$19,900,000
(1) Firm capacity.
Quantity Units
Total Project
CostUnit Cost
West UGA Expansion LID
East UGA Expansion LID
LID Area
Page 76 of 128
Figures
Page 77 of 128
<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SLWWTP<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL<SL&200(5&,$//63(11,(/652$'/652$'/60$,7/$1'/6 7+ :$6+,1*721/63($5//6$,53257/61$9<%$6(/6&$3,72//65,9(56+25(/67+5((5,9(56/60$',6213$5./61:&200216/6:HVW%URDGPRRU/6*ODGH5RDG/67DQN)DUP/6'HQW5RDG/6::73West UGA ExpansionLIDEast UGAExpansion LIDEast UGAExpansion LID24''30''24''12''30''12''12''12''16''12''14''18''12''15''12''12''8''12''15''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''15''12''15''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''15''12''15''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''16''12''12''12''16''12''8''12''12''15''15''15''12''12''12''8''8''8''16''12''12''12''21''12''12''15''12''15''%$/&20 02()$506//&38' )5$1./,1&2817< '7:$5(+286(//&0$560$567+5((%$,56//&68//,9$17+5((%$,56//&7+5((%$,56//&7+5((%$,56//&32572)3$6&2/$0%:(672132572)3$6&2%8516:(,7=52&.<+,//60$1$*(0(17/3&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&08//(1 (7$/ (,&.0(<(5:(,7=&2/($/)25'$%/,9,1*75867&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*3$6&26&+22/',675,&7123$6&26&+22/',675,&7122/%(5',1*3520$'(&216758&7,21//&2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*)$50//&'(3$570(172)1$785$/5(6285&(632572)3$6&286$32572)3$6&2&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&6,03621 (7$/ 6,03621 (7$/ 5RDGDQG3HDUO6WUHHW/6(DVW8*$/65LYHUYLHZ:HVW/648''42''48''48''48''42''48''48''30''42''48''42''30''48''48''48''30''30''42''48''48''48''48'''5$:,1*,6)8//6&$/(:+(1%$50($685(6´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age 78 of 128
3333333333333333333333333333333333<SL%52$'0225 %/9''(175'($*/
(
&5(
6
7
'5 %85165'&2/
8
0%,$
5,9(
5
5 '
6$1'<
5,'*(5'
52$'
1
5,&+9,(
:
'
5
)$11,1*5'0&'21$/''5 ,5,6/1&/$5.5'($6<677$</25)/$765''HQW5RDG/6West UGAExpansion LIDEast UGAExpansion LID24''24''12''18'' @S=0.22%15'' @ S=0.5%8'' @ S=0.5%12''@ S=0.9%12''@ S=0.5%12''@ S=0.5%12''@ S=0.6%12''@ S=0.6%12''@ S=0.22%12''@ S=0.5%12''@ S=0.22%12'' @ S=0.5%12''@ S=0.5%12''@ S=0.5%12''@ S=0.6%12''@ S=0.6%12''@ S=0.9%12''@ S=0.6%8'' @ S=0.5%12'' @S=0.5%15'' @ S=0.5%8'' @ S=0.5%
8'' @
S=0.5%8''@ S=1.1%12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''12''21'''7:$5(+286(//&0$560$567+5((%$,56//&68//,9$17+5((%$,56//&7+5((%$,56//&7+5((%$,56//&%8516:(,7=52&.<+,//60$1$*(0(17/3&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&08//(1 (7$/ (,&.0(<(5:(,7=$/)25'$%/,9,1*75867&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&6,03621 (7$/ 6,03621 (7$/ RE = 456.01'IE = 442.01'RE = 458.00'IE = 447.01'RE = 464.04'IE = 452.01'RE = 466.06'IE = 454.81'RE = 471.08'IE = 459.81'RE = 471.96'IE = 464.81'RE = 476.22'IE = 467.31'RE = 476.47'IE = 459.81'RE = 476.47'IE = 464.81'RE = 487.38'IE = 467.81'RE = 480.75'IE = 461.50'RE = 480.75'IE = 461.50'RE = 486.45'IE = 463.30RE = 491.14'IE = 465.50'RE = 500.04'IE = 467.66'RE = 504.73'IE = 476.66'RE = 518.63'IE = 485.66'RE = 512.94'IE = 491.66'RE = 526.31'IE = 497.66'RE = 520.02'IE = 503.66'RE = 520.00'IE = 509.66'RE = 525.95'IE = 517.16'RE = 487.30'IE = 468.30'RE = 498.28'IE = 476.75'RE = 506.00'IE = 481.75'RE = 507.82'IE = 486.25'RE = 519.26'IE = 491.25'RE = 518.01'IE = 496.25'RE = 521.99'IE = 501.25'RE = 530.27'IE = 506.25'RE = 525.44'IE = 511.25'RE = 531.00'IE = 518.75'RE = 519.00'IE = 491.25'RE = 520.00'IE = 498.25''5$:,1*,6)8//6&$/(:+(1%$50($685(6´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age 79 of 128
<SL<SL<SL<SL33333333333333333333333333333333333<SL<SL17+$9(
52$'$17,*8$'57+5((5,9(56 '56$1',)853.:<52$')(1:$<'5:5,*/(<'552%(57:$<1('56,52&&2'552$'6$17$)(/1
+8'6
2
1
'5
52$'6$17$&58=/148$'5$'5.$875$,/5'/$5('2'5&2/
8
0%,$
5,
9(
5
5
'52$'1$57(6,$'56$+$5$'56,1$,'552$'%85'(1%/9'52%(57$5'52$'&219(17,21'515$,/52$'$9(,9<5'%85165'29(57215'52$'1-$1(75'52$'
1 +,//723'5)267(5:(//6 5'1257+:(67&200216'5&+$3(/+,//%/9',(+20(5815'&/$5.5',:*/$'(125
7
+
5
'7$</25)/$765'52$'/67+5((5,9(56/60$',6213$5./61:&200216/6*ODGH5RDG/612'' @S=0.65%12'' @S=0.65%15'' @
S=0.5%12'' @S=0.65%12'' @
S=0.4%15'' @S=0.5%12'' @S=1.25%12'' @S=1.25%12'' @S=0.65%12''@ S=0.4%12'' @S=0.4%12'' @S=0.4%12'' @S=0.4%12'' @S=0.65%12'' @S=0.65%15'' @S=0.5%12'' @S=1.25%12'' @S=0.5%15'' @S=0.5%15'' @
S=0.5%
12'' @
S=0.75%12'' @S=0.65%12''@ S=0.4%12'' @S=0.75%12''@ S=1.25%12'' @S=0.5%12''@ S=0.75%12''@ S=0.75%12'' @
S=0.75%12'' @S=0.65%15'' @ S=0.5%15'' @ S=0.5%12'' @
S=0.4%12'' @ S=0.5%12'' @ S=0.5%
12'' @ S=0.5%12''12''12''12''15''%$/&20 02()$506//&38' )5$1./,1&2817< '7:$5(+286(//&0$560$5632572)3$6&2/$0%:(672132572)3$6&2&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&08//(1 (7$/ &2/($/)25'$%/,9,1*75867&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*3$6&26&+22/',675,&7123$6&26&+22/',675,&7122/%(5',1*3520$'(&216758&7,21//&2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*2/%(5',1*)$50//&'(3$570(172)1$785$/5(6285&(632572)3$6&286$32572)3$6&2&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&&2/80%,$:$7(56)$50//&RE = 398.00'IE = 377.50'RE = 410.01'IE = 393.30'RE = 445.92'IE = 430.80'RE = 412.81'IE = 400.88'RE = 417.59'IE = 405.88'RE = 452.41'IE = 410.88'RE = 438.33'IE = 419.28'RE = 470.42'IE = 448.28'RE = 478.06'IE = 460.78'RE = 493.71'IE = 473.28'RE = 486.09'IE = 478.28'RE = 442.32'IE = 428.65'RE = 459.94'IE = 438.78'RE = 464.83'IE = 448.90'RE = 472.96'IE = 459.10'RE = 477.55'IE = 468.78'RE = 482.61'IE = 475.43'RE = 500.00'IE = 477.00'RE = 505.91'IE = 486.75'RE = 511.28'IE = 494.88'RE = 512.36'IE = 486.91'RE = 510.72'IE = 493.41RE = 523.58'IE = 506.41'RE = 526.35'IE = 512.91'RE = 515.25'IE = 486.53'RE = 508.26'IE = 493.33'RE = 519.90'IE = 497.33'RE = 520.00'IE = 501.33'RE = 520.01'IE = 505.33'RE = 522.01'IE = 509.33'RE = 531.14'IE = 513.33'(DVW8*$/6West UGAExpansion LIDEast UGAExpansion LIDEast UGAExpansion LID'5$:,1*,6)8//6&$/(:+(1%$50($685(6´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age 80 of 128
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 8, 2021
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/13/21
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Utility Extension in the Unincorporated Islands & Urban Growth Area
(UGA)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Comprehensive Land Use Map with UGA Boundaries
UGA Comparison Map
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Providing municipal services to efficiently developed land is less of a financial
burden to the general taxpayers and ratepayer than providing those same
services to inefficiently developed land.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City has extended potable water to much of the unincorporated prior Urban
Growth Area (UGA) both north and south of Interstate 182 (I-182). While much
of the former County Riverview Area received potable water extensions many
years ago, the unincorporated area north of I-182 has received potable city water
more recently. For example, the unincorporated UGA area north of Burns Road
and west of Broadmoor has received City water within the last decade through
an agreement with the City.
With the recent adoption of the 2021 Compreh ensive Plan and expanded UGA,
staff requests consideration by Council of the overall policy direction for utility
extensions into the previous and expanded UGA.
Page 81 of 128
V. DISCUSSION:
The major consequence of uncoordinated/unplanned growth is sprawl, which
while inexpensive to develop, is the most expensive form of development to
provide with urban or municipal services. This results in a higher tax burden on
all taxpayers and higher rates on all ratepayers to fund such services.
Council, through the Comprehensive Plan process and in the adopted Council
Goals, has placed emphasis on increasing density within the UGA, recognizing
that lower density development on large lots is expensive and inefficient to
provide with urban level services, and is inconsistent with other adopted planning
goals and policies. To that end, the Comprehensive Plan is intended to avoid
sprawl by encouraging growth in areas where urban level services are available.
State - wide Planning Goals encourage the following:
1. encourage urban development in urban areas where adequate public
facilities
and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner; and
2. reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
low density development.
UGA's by definition are areas where growth and higher densities are expected
and that can be supported by cost -effective urban services. “Urban level
services” specifically include, both city sewer and water. On-site septic is not an
urban level service. Past practices of allowing the extension of City water, but
not low inefficient, to led has density our of portions into sewer, UGA
development patterns utilizing on-site septic. The amount of land required for on-
site septic is not conducive to achieving urban level densities.
Unlike developers constructing large scale plats, the individual homeowners of
smaller parcels currently served by septic are less financially capable of adding
density of cost relative the as portions the of unincorporated to UGA
decommissioning on-site septic and extending sewer to smaller replat projects
renders such extensions economically impracticable.
Because the Growth Management Act requires urban growth to occur within all
areas of the UGA, the legacy of these past development patterns may increase
costs of urban infill projects within certain areas of our UGA. To correct these
issues, the City recommends encouraging growth which will result in the phasing
in of urban level services, such as sewer, when such services are capable of
being provided.
Page 82 of 128
There are three general categories of unincorporated lands within the UGA
where policy direction should be established:
1. islands Unincorporated - partially area, the in Riverview primarily
developed (60%) with a domestic water system of varying adequacy
throughout, on-site septic systems, substandard rights-of-way in many
areas and grid system integrity hampered by proliferation of cul-de-sacs
or permitted structures that block logical road extensions. There are
some opportunities for development consistent with Comprehensive Plan
densities. Because of the past development patterns allowed, municipal
services will be challenging and costly to implement in much of this area.
The burden to current tax and rate payers should be a consideration for
annexations within these areas.
2. Lands within the 2008 UGA - generally there is a significant amount of
development relying on on-site septic systems (1/2 acre lot density).
Some opportunities remain for sanitary sewer to be provided in an
efficient manner but due to development patterns, more isolated parcels
would need to construct considerable off-site improvements to serve their
properties. Adequacy of existing public infrastructure and burden to
current rate and tax payers should be a consideration of annexati ons
within this area.
3. Lands added as part of the current UGA - these generally offer a "clean
slate" for development considerations and providing for urban level
densities.
Staff recommends that the City's utility extension policy is formulated using the
guidelines outlined below.
Unincorporated Islands:
• The unincorporated Riverview Area south of I-182 will be provided City
potable water in conjunction with building permits for single family homes
on existing parcels.
• Subdivision of existing parcels in the incorporated and unincorporated
Riverview Area south of I-182 will require extension of City sanitary sewer
in conjunction with any extension of City potable water.
• Staff to develop a variance procedure for Council consideration where
provision of sewer is considered impractical based on an engineering
analysis.
Lands within the 2008 UGA:
• Properties within the 2008 UGA will be provided City potable water in
conjunction with building permits for single family homes on existing
parcels.
Page 83 of 128
• Subdivision of existing parcels within the 2008 UGA will require extension
of City sanitary sewer in conjunction with any extension of City potable
water. Development to City level standards for streets and sidewalks
should be achieved through this process as well.
Lands added by the 2021 UGA:
• Lands added with the 2021 UGA will require annexation in conjunction
with any extension of City utilities (as a result of annexation - full
conformance with the City's Development and Construction Standards,
Impact Fees and other development regulations will apply).
While this initial direction is broken down to the above essentials, staff will
appreciate Council discussion and direction so the applicable code
revisions/ordinances can be prepared for formal consideration.
Page 84 of 128
Urban Growth BoundaryIndustrialIndustrialIndustrialAirport ReserveLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialIndustrialCommercialDNR ReserveLow Density ResidentialIndustrialDNR ReserveIndustrialLow Density ResidentialCommercialAirport ReserveCommercialCommercialLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialIndustrialLow Density ResidentialOpen Space ParksLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialIndustrialCommercialIndustrialCommercialOpen Space ParksIndustrialOpen Space ParksPublic Quasi-PublicPublic Quasi-PublicLow Density ResidentialMixed Use RegionalCommercialOpen Space ParksIndustrialLow Density ResidentialOfficeLow Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialConfederated Tribes - ColvilleLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialOpen Space ParksOfficeDNR ReserveMedium Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialOpen Space Parks
Medium Density ResidentialDNR ReserveLow Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialPublic Quasi-PublicCommercialMedium Density Residential Public Quasi-PublicPublic Quasi-PublicCommercial
CommercialCommercialOpen Space ParksOfficeCommercialMedium Density ResidentialMedium
De
nsit
y
R
esi
d
e
nti
alLow Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialPublic Quasi-PublicCommercial
Low De
n
sit
y
R
e
si
d
e
nti
al
DNR Reserve
High Density Residential
CommercialMedium Density ResidentialCommercialMixed Resi
d
e
n
t
i
al
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l Public Quasi-PublicMedium Density ResidentialLow Density ResidentialMedium High Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialOfficeMixed Residential CommercialAirport ReserveAirport ReserveMixed Residential CommercialMedium Density Residential
Medium De
n
s
i
t
y
R
e
si
d
e
n
ti
alMedium Density ResidentialCommercial Airport ReserveLow Density R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Low Density ResidentialComm
erci
al CommercialIndustrialCommercialMedium Density ResidentialOpen Space ParksCommercialCommercialCommercialAirport ReserveOpen Space Parks
Commercial
CommercialCommercialCommercialMedium Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialMixed Residential CommercialPascoI-182 EI-182 WUS 12 W
US 395 NUS 12 EE I 182 TO 20TH RAMPW LEWIS StE I 182 TO US 395 RAMP SN ROAD 68 TO I 182 RAMP WS ROAD 68 TO I 182 RAMP EA TO US 12 RAMP EUS 395 S20TH TO I 182 RAMP EI-182 EI-182 WW COURT StUS 12 WUS 12 EUS 395 S
W ARGENT RdUS 395 N E A StROAD 68CLARK RdW A StDENT RdW SYLVESTER StN RAILR
O
A
D
A
v
e
SANDIFUR PkwyW LEWIS StW WERNETT RdROAD 52BURNS RdBURDEN BlvdROAD 44CHAPEL HILL BlvdROAD 48ROAD 84ROAD 56N 20TH AveROAD 60WRIGLEY DrROAD 64HARRIS RdROAD 36N COMMERCIAL Ave
N 4TH A
v
e
ROAD 92IVY RdROAD 96W PEARL StN 14TH AveBROADMOOR BlvdGLADE NORT
H
R
d E FOSTER WELLS RDROAD 72W CLARK StROAD 90E CRANE StMASSEY DrN CAPITOL AvePASCO KAHLOTUS RdEASY StJANET RdROAD 88ROAD 68 N E LEWIS StW B StW HENRY StROAD 100ALDERSON RdS 10TH AveN 18TH AveROAD 34N 19TH AveW BONNEVILLE StE AINSWORTH AveN OREG
O
N
A
v
e
N 22ND AveE LEWIS PlS ROAD 40 EIRIS LnE DOCK StINDUSTRIAL WayKOHLER RdW ELLA StN ELM AveE WAREHOUSE StROAD 36 NN 1ST Av
eDIETRICH RdROAD 111S OREG
O
N
A
v
e
RICHVIEW
D
R PIMLICO DrSHORELINE RdSACAJAWEA PARK RdSINAI DrLAREDO DrSWALLO
W
A
v
e
N 7TH AveCONVENTION DrSANTA FE LnE B Cir
STEARM
A
N
A
v
e E BROADWAY StN OWEN AveHILLTOP DrSAHARA DrS 4TH A
v
e
ARTESIA DrMADISON AveROBERT WAYNE Dr W DRADIE StATLANTA LnN WEHE AveE CARGO StS ELM AveS 5TH AveROAD 42 NE FOSTER WELLS RdFENWAY DrW COLUMBIA StPIERRE DrTHREE RIVERS DrWELSH DrYUMA DrN 28TH AveOLIVER DrMEADOW VIEW DrDESERT PLATEAU DrROAD 62ROAD 30ST THOMAS DrN 24TH AveS 6TH AveMESSARA LnTAYLOR FLATS RDSIDON LnFARM RdN CEDAR AveN 26TH AveN 18TH DrBYERS RdCOLU
M
BI
A
RIVE
R
Rd E KARTCHNER StE B StE BUTTE StROAD 54SANDY RIDGE Rd HERITAGE BLVDROBERTA RdGALWAY LnMIDLAND LnROAD 42VALDEZ LnPHOENIX LnW SHOSHONE StROAD 57IVY LnW AINSWORTH AveS WEHE AveN UTAH A
v
e
SIROCCO DrS 9TH AveQUADRA DrFLORES LnWILL
O
W
WaySALEM DrN 17TH AveKAU TRAIL RdW RICHARDSON RdROAD 108PORTO LnSEVILLE DrS CEDAR AveHORIZON DrS 1ST AveHUDSON DrOCHOCO LnMIA LnMAPLE DrKING AveE SALT LAKE StE PARKVIEW BlvdROAD 105ROAD 67N VENTURE RdROAD 80VINCENZO DrE HIGHLAND StROAD 103SEGOVIA DrSANTA CRUZ LnLINCOLN DrNW COMMONS DrMOLINE
LnSAVARY DrFINNH
O
R
S
E
L
nARTHUR LnVENTURE PlN CAPITOL AVES OWEN Ave SE ROAD 36HERITAGE BlvdTEXADA LnE JAMES StVALENCIA DrE SPOKANE StBABINE DrS 12TH AveMURI
S
L
nMELODY LnCOMISKEY DrCURLEW LnCATALONIA DrW C StCHIAWANA PARK RdN 13TH AveSUNSET LnW RIVER StN DOUGLAS AveS MAITLAND AveTRUMAN LnS 28TH AveDESERET DrMONTAGUE LnPARLEY DrN SYCAMORE AveDUNDAS LnST PAUL LnROAD 76MUSTANG DrDUROC LnCLEVELAND LnMADRONA Ave
PERCHERON DrW PARK StROAD 39JEFFERSON DrMONTEREY DrRIVERHILL DrTAMARISK DrROAD 50REAGAN WayCOOK LnN 2ND A
v
e
TAFT DrS 7TH AveDESERT PlSEDONA DrW RIVERHAVEN StW JAN StOAK LnHAYDEN LnN RAINI
E
R
A
v
e
W NIXON StTYRE DrRICKY CtPROVIDENCE LnBUCHANAN LnNASH DrS 20TH AveTUSAYAN DrHOMERUN RdQUAIL RdS MAIN
A
v
e
E HILLSBORO StCRESCENT RdW BELL StN 5TH AveWESTMINSTER LnROAD 97BLACKFOOT DrSE ROAD 18MALAGA DrEL PASO DrROAD 37ROAD 104W OPAL StBAJA DrSIERRA DrTRAVEL PL
A
Z
A
W
a
y
STUTZ DrBILBAO DrSUNSET TrlRICKY RdROAD 38AMY LoopGRANT LnS 13TH AveS IDAHO
A
v
e
SNOQUALMIE DrN 16TH AveMOJAVE DrE ALTON StN 10TH AveLUCENA DrROCK CREEK DrBEDFORD StE BAKER StKENT Ln62ND PlJACKSON LnE DOCK STMATIA LnROAD 32LUNA DrCLEMENTE LnPALOMINO DrW IRVING StW HOPKINS StW AGATE StROAD 35BUDSAGE DrIBIS LnEMPIRE DrHAYES LnS HUGO AveCOLDWATER DrGARLAND StARBUTUS AveLADD RdDESOTO DrRoad 119TANK FARM RdE CLARK StW RUBY StROCKET LnROAD 101E ADAMS StBAKERLOO LnTARSUS LnRUTH DrWHIPPLE AveSTERLING RdCATHEDRAL DrN TACO
M
A
A
v
e
RODEO DrFRANKLIN RdNorfolk DrOUTLET DrASHEN DrCHARDONNAY DrPHILIPPI DrRIVER BlvdDODGER DrW MARGARET StBOISE DrVARNEY Ln
KITIMAT LnBAYBERRY DrLA SALLE DrANTIGUA DrN 12TH AveS GRAY AveRIO GRANDE LnSARATOGA LnKLICKITAT LnBELMONT DrFRONTAGE RdSTAR LnPACKARD DrSHETLAND DrE ST HELENS StCASSIAR DrKALAHARI DrKOKANEE DrHOMESTEAD DrROAD 45N 9TH Av
e
N 21ST AveW JAY StPALMYRA DrJASON AveJUNEAU LnS 18TH AveJULIE LnSE ROAD 24SALMON DrCAMDEN DrEARHART DrGEHRIG DrADOBE DrSHIRE DrAVION DrN BEECH AveN 23RD AveBAYVIEW LnLAKELSE LNMALTESE DrROAD 40ROAD 94BULLDOG LnCHEHALIS DrW MELVILLE RdWILDCAT LnDESERT DrE ALVINA StN 15TH AveSYRAH DrPELICAN RdROBINSON DrBISMARCK LnROAD 44 NW MARIE StTERUEL LnPANTHER LnROAD 46ROAD 49RYELAND DrINDIGO LnWOODSMAN DrPRAIRIE LnCYAN DrKATHREN LnLAPIS LnSPIEDEN DrSTINSO
N
A
v
e
ELON LnORIOLE DrN 11TH A
v
e E WASHINGTON StROAD 61ROOSEVELT DrW LIVINGSTON RdMILAGRO DrCANYON DrAUSTIN DrPADDINGTON LnW OCTAVE StPAMPLONA DrPINEHURST DrMELITA LnSTAFFORD DrPEARL StSTUDEBAKER DrPHEASANT LnRUVEN StTERMINAL DrSOMERSET LnSHORELINE CtAUTOPLEX WayARIANA LnSONORA DrCOWLITZ LnEXETER LnKINGSBURY DrWHETSTONE DrQUAIL RUN RdS COMMERCIAL AveVALLEY VIEW PlN 19TH Dr43RD WayROCKROSE LnRIVERHAWK LnW HAVSTAD StMAYNE DrN 6TH AveMISSION RIDGE DrROAD 47ROAD 70 NJERSEY DrTIPPET LnN 3RD AveS WALNUT AvePERGA DrROAD 110W CLARA StHORNBY LnGALLATIN RdRALEIGH DrSE ROAD 20GRANDIN LnCHARLESTON LnOLIVIA CtFRONTIER LoopRUBY CtSPRINGER LnKENDALL DrWHITEFISH LnMONROVIA LnROAD 70TIGER LnROAD 70 PlPENDER DrW LEOLA StN IDAHO AveBURLI
N
GT
O
N StN CHARLES AveSILVER MOUND DrCOVENTRY LnMARIE CtAINTREE LnROBERTS DrWALLOWA LnPOOLER RdLAMB CtANGUS DrW YAKIMA StCOHO CtSTONE CtCHELAN CtROAD 41S MYRTLE Ave65TH PlWILLOW CirW BROWN StW OPAL PlCOLBY CtREDONDA DrROGUE DrWALKER WayW PARK PlN 8TH AveROAD 48 NMAXIM CtDURHAM CtANTIOCH DrBOSCH CtCORNISH LnINDUST
RI
AL PlLANDON CtWHISKEY RIVER RdMIDDLE FORK St
SOCKEYE LnS 19TH AveTIGUE CtATHENS DrJACOBS LnROAD 57 PlZINNIA CtFERNWOOD LnOLIN CtSTEELE PlCARIBOO DrW CARTMELL StMAGNOLIA CtBUMPAOUS StS 3RD AveZEPHER CtCAVALIER CtST PAUL CtPINNACLE LNTIMOTHY CtHUDSON CtVICTORIA CtIONE StROAD 57 CtCHRISTINA CtRoad 71 NMOREHOUSE PlSANTA ROSA CtSEMILLA CtN 27TH AveGUEMES LnS 17TH AveS 15TH AveBLACKHAWK CtALDERMAN RdS CHESTNUT AvePINE CtCEDAR
R
o
w
RED ROAN CtEAGLE REACH CtCAM RdROAD 55TER-RAY CtROAD 60N 9TH AveROAD 54W LIVINGSTON RdN 8TH A
v
eUS 395 NW NIXON StROAD 38W BROWN StN 2ND A
v
e
MAPLE DrW YAKIMA StW AGATE StN 10TH AveW IRVING StW BROWN StS 7TH Av
e
W DRADIE StW BROWN StN 7TH AveW RICHARDSON RdW MARGARET StN 6TH Av
e S 5TH AveW NIXON StE ST HELENS StW MARIE StW NIXON StW IRVING StROAD 32W JAN StW MARIE StROAD 80W OCTAVE StW PARK StROAD 76W BROWN StROAD 84W MARIE StW RUBY StW PARK StBURNS RdN 5TH AveANTIGUA DrROAD 54ROAD 36ROAD 76N 8TH AveROAD 60BURNS RdW HENRY StUS 395 S
W JAY StROAD 37W RUBY StROAD 35W RUBY StN 16TH AveN 12TH AveROAD 52W JAY StUS 395 SN 26TH AveW RICHARDSON RdN 15TH AveW PEARL StN 9TH Av
e
W DRADIE StW BROWN StROAD 41W ELLA StROAD 70W HENRY StUS 395 NW PARK StW RUBY StWHIPPLE AveROAD 44ROAD 45N 12TH A
v
e
W RUBY StW MARIE StW HOPKINS StN 4TH A
v
e
W MARGARET StN 15TH AveN 19TH AvePEARL StROAD 46N 10TH A
v
e
W MARIE StN 22ND AveSUNSET TrlW HENRY StW LIVINGSTON RdN 7TH Av
eW SHOSHONE StROAD 38W RUBY StROAD 42N 24TH AveW OCTAVE StROAD 50FRANKLIN RdS GRAY AveROAD 39E HILLSBORO StW MARIE StN 17TH AveN BEECH AveW AGATE StROAD 37W JAY StN 3RD A
v
e
Comp Plan Land Use ApprovedFuture_LUAirport ReserveCommercialConfederated Tribes - ColvilleDNR ReserveHigh Density ResidentialIndustrialLow Density ResidentialMedium Density ResidentialMedium High Density ResidentialMixed Residential CommercialMixed Use InterchangeMixed Use NeighborhoodMixed Use RegionalOfficeOpen Space ParksPublic Quasi-PublicCity LimitsUGA 20210 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000FeetPage 85 of 128
Old UGAI-182 EI-182 WUS 12 W
US 395 NUS 12 EE I 182 TO 20TH RAMPW LEWIS StE I 182 TO US 395 RAMP SN ROAD 68 TO I 182 RAMP WS ROAD 68 TO I 182 RAMP EA TO US 12 RAMP EUS 395 S20TH TO I 182 RAMP EI-182 EI-182 WW COURT StUS 12 WUS 12 EUS 395 S
W ARGENT RdUS 395 N E A StROAD 68CLARK RdW A StDENT RdW SYLVESTER StN RAILR
O
A
D
A
v
e
SANDIFUR PkwyW LEWIS StW WERNETT RdROAD 52BURNS RdBURDEN BlvdROAD 44CHAPEL HILL BlvdROAD 48ROAD 84ROAD 56N 20TH AveROAD 60WRIGLEY DrROAD 64HARRIS RdROAD 36N COMMERCIAL Ave
N 4TH A
v
e
ROAD 92IVY RdROAD 96W PEARL StN 14TH AveBROADMOOR BlvdGLADE NORT
H
R
d E FOSTER WELLS RDROAD 72W CLARK StROAD 90E CRANE StMASSEY DrN CAPITOL AvePASCO KAHLOTUS RdEASY StJANET RdROAD 88ROAD 68 N E LEWIS StW B StW HENRY StROAD 100ALDERSON RdS 10TH AveN 18TH AveROAD 34N 19TH AveW BONNEVILLE StE AINSWORTH AveN OREG
O
N
A
v
e
N 22ND AveE LEWIS PlS ROAD 40 EIRIS LnE DOCK StINDUSTRIAL WayKOHLER RdW ELLA StN ELM AveE WAREHOUSE StROAD 36 NN 1ST Av
eDIETRICH RdROAD 111S OREG
O
N
A
v
e
RICHVIEW
D
R PIMLICO DrSHORELINE RdSACAJAWEA PARK RdSINAI DrE HELENA StLAREDO DrSWALLO
W
A
v
e
N 7TH AveCONVENTION DrSANTA FE LnE B Cir
STEARM
A
N
A
v
e E BROADWAY StN OWEN AveHILLTOP DrSAHARA DrS 4TH A
v
e
ARTESIA DrMADISON AveROBERT WAYNE DrW DRADIE StATLANTA LnN WEHE AveE CARGO StS ELM AveS 5TH AveROAD 42 NE FOSTER WELLS RdFENWAY DrW COLUMBIA StPIERRE DrTHREE RIVERS DrWELSH DrYUMA DrN 28TH AveOLIVER DrMEADOW VIEW DrDESERT PLATEAU DrROAD 62ROAD 30ST THOMAS DrN 24TH AveS 6TH AveMESSARA LnTAYLOR FLATS RDSIDON LnFARM RdN CEDAR AveN 26TH AveN 18TH DrBYERS RdCOLU
M
BI
A
RI
V
E
R
R
d E KARTCHNER StE B StE BUTTE StROAD 54SANDY RIDGE Rd HERITAGE BLVDROBERTA RdGALWAY LnMIDLAND LnROAD 42VALDEZ LnPHOENIX LnW SHOSHONE StROAD 57IVY Ln W AINSWORTH AveS WEHE AveN UTAH
A
v
e
SIROCCO DrS 9TH AveQUADRA DrFLORES LnWILL
O
W
WaySALEM DrN 17TH AveKAU TRAIL RdW RICHARDSON RdROAD 108PORTO LnSEVILLE DrW ARGENT PlS CEDAR AveHORIZON DrS 1ST AveHUDSON DrOCHOCO LnMIA LnMAPLE DrKING AveE SALT LAKE StE PARKVIEW BlvdW WASHINGTON StROAD 105ROAD 67N VENTURE RdROAD 80VINCENZO DrE HIGHLAND StROAD 103SEGOVIA DrSANTA CRUZ LnLINCOLN DrNW COMMONS DrMOLINE
LnSAVARY DrFINNHORSE LnARTHUR LnVENTURE PlN CAPITOL AVES OWEN AveSE ROAD 36HERITAGE BlvdTEXADA LnE JAMES StVALENCIA DrE SPOKANE StBABINE DrS 12TH AveMURI
S
L
nMELODY LnCOMISKEY DrCURLEW LnCATALONIA DrW C StCHIAWANA PARK RdN 13TH AveSUNSET LnW RIVER StMARYHILL LnN DOUGLAS AveS MAITLAND AveTRUMAN LnN HUGO AveS 28TH AveDESERET DrMONTAGUE LnPARLEY DrN SYCAMORE AveDUNDAS LnST PAUL LnROAD 76MUSTANG DrCLEVELAND LnMADRONA Ave
PERCHERON DrW PARK StROAD 39OVERTON RdJEFFERSON DrMONTEREY DrRIVERHILL DrTAMARISK DrROAD 50E SUPERIOR StREAGAN WayCOOK LnN 2ND A
v
e
TAFT DrS 7TH AveDESERT PlSEDONA DrW RIVERHAVEN StW JAN StOAK LnHAYDEN LnN RAINI
E
R
A
v
e
W NIXON StTYRE DrRICKY CtPROVIDENCE LnS 4TH LnBUCHANAN LnWOODBINE DrNASH DrS 20TH AveTUSAYAN DrHOMERUN RdCORD DrQUAIL RdDES MOINES LnS MAIN
A
v
e
E HILLSBORO StCRESCENT RdN WALDEMAR AveW BELL StN 5TH AveWESTMINSTER LnROAD 97BLACKFOOT DrSE ROAD 18MALAGA DrEL PASO DrROAD 37ROAD 104W OPAL StBAJA DrSIERRA DrTRAVEL PL
A
Z
A
W
a
y
STUTZ DrBILBAO DrSUNSET TrlRICKY RdROAD 38LATAH LnAMY LoopMAJESTIA LnGRANT LnS 25TH AveS 13TH AveS IDAHO
A
v
e
SNOQUALMIE DrN 16TH AveMOJAVE DrE ALTON StN 10TH AveLUCENA DrROCK CREEK DrTHISTLEDOWN DrBEDFORD StE BAKER StMONTGOMERY LnKENT LnANACONDA Ave62ND PlJACKSON LnE DOCK STMATIA LnROAD 32LUNA DrVERMILION LnCLEMENTE LnPALOMINO DrW IRVING StW HOPKINS StW AGATE StROAD 35BUDSAGE DrIBIS LnEMPIRE DrHAYES LnS HUGO AveCOLDWATER DrGARLAND StARBUTUS AveLADD RdDESOTO DrRoad 119 TANK FARM RdE CLARK StW RUBY StROCKET LnROAD 101E ADAMS StBAKERLOO LnTARSUS LnRUTH DrWHIPPLE AveSTERLING RdCATHEDRAL DrN TACO
M
A
A
v
e
RODEO DrFRANKLIN RdNorfolk DrOUTLET DrASHEN DrCHARDONNAY DrPHILIPPI DrRIVER BlvdDODGER DrW MARGARET StBOISE DrVARNEY Ln
KITIMAT LnBAYBERRY DrLA SALLE DrANTIGUA DrN 12TH AveS GRAY AveRIO GRANDE LnKLICKITAT LnBELMONT DrFRONTAGE RdSTAR LnPACKARD DrSHETLAND DrE ST HELENS StKALAHARI DrKOKANEE DrE GEORGE StHOMESTEAD DrROAD 45N 9TH Av
e
N 21ST AveW JAY StPALMYRA DrJASON AveJUNEAU LnS 18TH AveJULIE LnSE ROAD 24SALMON DrCAMDEN DrEARHART DrGEHRIG DrADOBE DrSHIRE DrAVION DrROAD 76 NN BEECH AveN 23RD AveBAYVIEW LnLAKELSE LNMALTESE DrROAD 40DUNSMUIR DrROAD 94BULLDOG LnCHEHALIS DrW MELVILLE RdWILDCAT LnDESERT DrE ALVINA StN 15TH AveSYRAH DrPELICAN RdROBINSON DrBISMARCK LnROAD 44 NW MARIE StTERUEL LnPANTHER LnROAD 46ROAD 49RYELAND DrINDIGO LnWOODSMAN DrN AVERY AvePRAIRIE LnCYAN DrKATHREN LnLAPIS LnSPIEDEN DrSTINSO
N
A
v
e
ELON LnORIOLE DrN 11TH AveROAD 58E WASHINGTON StROAD 61ROOSEVELT DrW LIVINGSTON RdMILAGRO DrWELLINGTON DrCANYON DrAUSTIN DrPADDINGTON LnW OCTAVE StMANZANITA LnPAMPLONA DrPINEHURST DrMELITA LnSTAFFORD DrPEARL StSTUDEBAKER DrPHEASANT LnTERMINAL DrSOMERSET LnSHORELINE CtAUTOPLEX WayARIANA LnSONORA DrCOWLITZ LnKINGSBURY DrWHETSTONE DrS COMMERCIAL AveVALLEY VIEW PlN 19TH Dr43RD WayROCKROSE LnRIVERHAWK LnW HAVSTAD StMAYNE DrN 6TH AveMISSION RIDGE DrROAD 47ROAD 70 NCANDLESTICK DrJERSEY DrTIPPET LnN 3RD AveTURF PARADISE DrS WALNUT AvePERGA DrROAD 110W CLARA StHORNBY LnGALLATIN RdRALEIGH DrSE ROAD 20GRANDIN LnCHARLESTON LnOLIVIA CtFRONTIER LoopRUBY CtSPRINGER LnKENDALL DrS 26TH AveWHITEFISH LnMONROVIA LnROAD 70NOTTINGHAM DrTIGER LnNORFOLK DrROAD 70 PlPENDER DrW LEOLA StN IDAHO AveBUCKINGHAM DrBURLI
N
GT
O
N StN CHARLES AveSILVER MOUND DrHOLLAND AVEMARIE CtAINTREE DrWALLOWA LnPOOLER RdLAMB CtANGUS DrROBERTS DrW YAKIMA StCOHO CtSTONE CtCHELAN CtROAD 41S MYRTLE Ave65TH PlWILLOW CirW BROWN StW OPAL PlCOLBY CtREDONDA DrROGUE DrWALKER WayW PARK PlN 8TH AveROAD 48 NMAXIM CtHOLLAND LnDURHAM CtANTIOCH DrBOSCH CtCORNISH LnCOCHINS LnINDUST
RI
AL PlLANDON CtWHISKEY RIVER RdMIDDLE FORK St
SOCKEYE LnS 19TH AveCHIAWANA DrTIGUE CtATHENS DrJACOBS LnKILLDEER LnROAD 57 PlZINNIA CtFERNWOOD LnOLIN CtSTEELE PlCARIBOO DrW CARTMELL StMAGNOLIA Ct66TH PlBUMPAOUS StS 3RD AveZEPHER CtCAVALIER CtST PAUL CtTEKOA DrPINNACLE LNTIMOTHY CtHUDSON CtCHERRY LnVICTORIA CtIONE StROAD 57 CtCHRISTINA CtRoad 71 NMAVERICK CtMOREHOUSE PlSANTA ROSA CtRoad 53 CtSEMILLA CtN 27TH AveGUEMES LnS 17TH AveS 15TH AveBLACKHAWK CtALDERMAN RdS CHESTNUT AveWENATCHEE CtPINE CtCEDAR
R
o
w
RED ROAN CtEAGLE REACH CtCAM RdROAD 55PACIFIC PINES DrTER-RAY CtWADE CtW RUBY StSUNSET TrlN 4TH A
v
e W NIXON StW HENRY StW LIVINGSTON RdROAD 44W YAKIMA StW BROWN StROAD 45ROAD 60ROAD 76ROAD 38W BROWN StN 8TH A
v
e
W BROWN StROAD 56N 17TH AveROAD 41N 3RD Av
e
MAPLE DrW NIXON StW MARIE StW MARGARET StN 11TH A
v
e
W AGATE StROAD 36US 395 NW MELVILLE RdN 26TH AveROAD 52E HILLSBORO StN 22ND AveW MARIE StW MARGARET StN 9TH AvePEARL StW PARK StW RICHARDSON RdN 12TH A
v
e
W HENRY StW OCTAVE StROAD 37ROAD 32ROAD 70US 395 NUS 395 S
ROAD 35W RUBY StN 10TH AveN 7TH Av
e
W HENRY StROAD 54ROAD 42W MARIE StN 12TH AveN BEECH AveBURNS RdW JAN StN 8TH AveW RICHARDSON RdN 15TH AveW PARK StROAD 38W RUBY StW PARK StW JAY StN 23RD AveW SHOSHONE StROAD 37W JAY StW RUBY StS 7TH Av
e
ROAD 76W NIXON StROAD 50W DRADIE StN 7TH AveW BROWN StS 5TH AveW MARGARET StW ELLA StW PEARL StW JAY StROAD 84ROAD 76W RUBY StN 19TH AveUS 395 SN 9TH Av
e
W MARIE StFRANKLIN RdN 10TH A
v
e
ROAD 46ROAD 80W MARIE StW DRADIE StBURNS RdS GRAY AveROAD 60W LIVINGSTON RdROAD 92W IRVING StN 12TH AveW IRVING StANTIGUA DrN 24TH AveW OCTAVE StW OCTAVE StW MARGARET StN 5TH AveW MARIE StW HENRY StROAD 39W HOPKINS StE ALVINA StW RICHARDSON RdROAD 35W PARK StE ST HELENS StW JAY StN 3RD Ave0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,0001,000FeetPage 86 of 128
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 3, 2021
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/13/21
FROM: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: National Community Survey
I. REFERENCE(S):
Draft Policy Questions
Prior Community Survey Policy Questions
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
General Fund - $18,500 budgeted for this effort.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
In anticipation for Council's biennial goal setting effort, the City has contracted
for a community survey to be completed since 2005. Staff is in communication
with the National Research Center (NRC) to conduct the National Community
Survey (NCS) in Pasco consisting primarily of standard questions regarding the
availability and quality of municipal services.
The results of this statistically valid survey have served as a valuable tool for
Council in goal-setting efforts and decision making with respect to public policies,
investment and programmatic focus areas. With several cycles of experience,
Council, staff and the public can identify trend lines where the city is making
progress in the opinion of respondents, where we are not, and fine tune efforts
to be more effective. The survey results and subsequent analysis provides
policy-makers with reliable information on which to make decisions in the public
interest and how Pasco compares in terms of performance with other similar
cities utilizing the NCS as a tool. Historically, the City has conducted the NCS in
Page 87 of 128
the fall so that the information is available for the Council's post -election cycle
goal-setting retreat, in this case, in early 2022.
In addition to the questions specific to the major services the City provides, the
Council may add up to three "policy" questions to the survey without additional
cost. Each of the City's previous NCS efforts included policy questions. In order
to have the policy questions included in the survey this fall, NRC will need our
finalized questions to them by early-October. Attached is a comprehensive listing
of supplemental questions and results dating back to 2005.
The 2019 yielded 207 responses from a sample of 1,700 households with their
traditional mailing approach. NRC recommends a hybrid approach, 1,200
households to receive traditional mailed surveys and another 1,500 households
to receive information to complete survey online only, to achieve a margin of
error of +/- 5% for the 2021 survey. The database utilized to generate the
households is from the City's utility billing data.
In addition to responding by mail, sample households have the option to respond
to the survey online. The City has opted to include survey enhancements
including a Spanish-only survey online and survey results geographically (City
Council voting districts) in previous surveys.
The City has also invited the community to submit survey responses online
(results to be kept separate to maintain the scientific results of the base random
survey) in previous years. An additional 289 responses were received in 2019
with this option.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends continuation of the Spanish-only online response option,
results by geographic areas in the 2021 survey, and inclusion of City policy
questions. The total cost of the survey is estimated at $18,500.
With the potential for hundreds of households to participate and provide input to
their City government, the NCS is one of the City's largest interactive community
outreach efforts in terms of numbers involved.
In an effort to stimulate discussion, staff proposed possible policy topics at the
August 23 workshop meeting for Council's consideration. Council considered the
proposed topics and, discussed others. Based on Council direction, staff has
drafted policy questions for Council consideration.
Staff seeks Council discussion on the attached drafted policy questions.
Page 88 of 128
Draft National Community Survey Policy Questions
Short Term Rentals: Please indicate how much you would support or oppose short term rentals
(Airbnb, VRBO, Flipkey, etc.) in our community.
• Strongly support
• Somewhat support
• Somewhat oppose
• Strongly oppose
• Don't know
Mental Health Sales Tax: Please indicate how much you would support or oppose a one-tenth
of a percent sales tax for mental health services in our community.
• Strongly support
• Somewhat support
• Somewhat oppose
• Strongly oppose
• Don't know
Marijuana: Please indicate how much you would support or oppose lifting the moratorium on
private sale of marijuana in the City of Pasco.
• Strongly support
• Somewhat support
• Somewhat oppose
• Strongly oppose
• Don't know
OR
Marijuana: Please indicate how much you would support or oppose lifting the private sale of
marijuana in the City of Pasco.
• Strongly support
• Somewhat support
• Somewhat oppose
• Strongly oppose
• Don't know
Page 89 of 128
2019
Funding Public Art: Pasco recently formed an Arts and Culture
Commission. The Commission will be responsible for finding funding and
resources to create several public art projects. To what extent do you
support or oppose using public funds to help pay for public art projects?
Affordable Housing: The City of Pasco is
exploring ways to take action to increase the
development/supply of more affordable housing
units. To what extent would you support or oppose
the City exploring each the following options?
Interest in Downtown: How likely, if at all, would each of the following be to bring you to downtown more often?
Page 90 of 128
2017
Code Enforcement: Responding to resident
complaints about trash, weeds, loud noise and
barking dots, the City handles approximately 3,000
code violations per year. Would you like to see code
enforcement in Pasco increase, decrease or stay the
same?
Fire Stations: Two fire protection and emergency
medical response facilities need to be replaced
and/or relocated to better serve the community with
improved response times and space for staffing and
modern equipment. To what extent would you
support or oppose a property tax to fund a new
fire/EMS facility?
Community Center: If a new community recreation center were to be constructed, it could
support a number of different recreation interests. Please indicate your household’s likely level
of interest, if any, in each of the following types of recreation categories:
Page 91 of 128
2015
Recycling and Yard Waste
Services: The City is
considering proving curbside
container recycling and yard
waste services. To what
extent would you support or
oppose these services being
offered:
Traffic Cameras: In order to reduce the rate of serious
traffic accidents at major intersections, the City is
considering installing cameras to increase red light
compliance. To what extent do you support or oppose the
installation of traffic cameras at select intersections in
Pasco?
District‐based Voting in General Elections: Of the seven members of City Council, five
members are district‐based, with only residents within the district able to run for election and
only voters residing within the district voting on district candidates in primary elections and
city‐wide voting in the general (final) election. The method of voting for district‐based
candidates (district‐based voting at the primary level and city‐wide voting in the general
election) is dictated by state law. The City is considering whether to push to change the law to
allow for district‐based voting in the general election in communities that choose this approach.
To what extent do you support or oppose…
Page 92 of 128
2013
Ambulance Fees in Fire District #3: The “donut hole” area surrounded by Pasco has received
ambulance service from the Pasco Fire Department paid by Fire District #3 at an equivalent fee
of $1.00 per household per month (compared with Pasco residents’ fee of $6.25/month). If the
City continues to provide the same paramedic ambulance service to
Fire District #3 that it provides to City residents, to what extent do
you support or oppose altering the contract so that District residents
pay at least the same fee as Pasco residents?
Funding Large Projects: Funding large projects, such as a convention center, performing arts
center, aquatics facility or museum in Pasco can be done in a number of ways. Partnering with
the Regional Public Facilities District (with the approval of Tri City voters) can finance projects of
$35 million or more. The Pasco Public Facilities District (Pasco only) could finance a project of
about $10 million. To what extent do you support or oppose each of the following?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Partnering with the RPFD on large projects that can be
approved by the voters of the three cities
44% 35%
Working independently with the PFD to identify a small
project for Pasco
27% 48%
Abandoning efforts to consider future facilities 7% 24%
Pasco Senior Center: Use of the Pasco Senior Center by seniors has continued to decline over
time, but still requires increased funding to remain open. To what extent do you support or
oppose transitioning the Pasco Senior Center into a “community recreation center” with the
following programming options?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Create a community recreation center with
programming for all ages and maintain the current
amount of programming for seniors
38% 41%
Create a community recreation center with
programming for all ages and decrease programming
for seniors
31% 30%
Leave Pasco Senior Center as is; do not create a
community recreation center
11% 25%
Strongly Support 70%
Somewhat Support 16%
Somewhat Oppose 7%
Strongly Oppose 6%
Page 93 of 128
2011
Impact Fees: Impact fees are assessed on all new housing construction to help pay for related
public infrastructure (like roads and parks). To what extent do you support or oppose a change
to reflect the city’s “ability to pay”?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
42% 37% 11% 9%
Labor Negotiations and Arbitration: The City of Pasco is considering asking the state to change
the process arbitrators use in organized‐labor negotiations to ensure that an individual city’s
budget or “ability to pay” is factored into the arbitration decisions. To what extent do you
support or oppose a change to reflect the city’s “ability to pay”?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
27% 39% 22% 12%
District Based Voting: There are seven members of the City Council; five positions require a
candidate to reside within a geographical district within the City and two positions are elected
“at large” without regard to district residency. The purpose of having some districts is to assure
reasonable geographic representation of Council members throughout the city. Please indicate
which of the following best reflects your view:
Favor the current system as described
above
70%
Prefer fewer at large representatives 16%
Prefer more at large representatives 7%
Page 94 of 128
2009
Curbside Recycling: To what extent do you support or oppose establishing curbside recycling
service, if it requires an increase to your garbage pickup service cost of $4 to $5 per month?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
35% 28% 18% 19%
Fluoride: To what extent do you support or oppose the City continuing to add fluoride to the
City’s drinking water system?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
73% 30% 12% 16%
Regional Centers Sales Tax: A committee, consisting of representatives of the cities of
Kennewick, Richland and Pasco, has been studying the feasibility of developing regional centers
(e.g. aquatic center, performing arts center, etc.) that could be used by all residents in the
region and considering voter approved sales tax and property tax options to finance them.
Because a sales tax would be paid by visitors as well as residents and would be paid in much
smaller increments throughout the year, among other reasons, the committee has tentatively
concluded that a sales tax increase would be preferable to a property tax increase. To what
extent d oy agree or disagree with this conclusion?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
30% 47% 15% 9%
Page 95 of 128
2007
City’s Role in Downtown Business: To what extent do you support or oppose the City taking a
more active role in working to improve downtown business area?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
54% 38% 6% 2%
Corridor Landscaping: To what extent do you support or oppose the City installing and
maintaining landscaping along select major street corridors to improve the appearance of the
community?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
57% 32% 10% 1%
Aquatics/Water Park: As you may know, the three public pools in Pasco are in need of
complete renovation. As an alternative, to what degree would you support or oppose the City
building a new water park (including a pool slide and other water features) that would replace
on (or possibly two) existing swimming pools?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
48% 30% 13% 8%
Page 96 of 128
2005
Chiawana Park Costs: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
“The City of Pasco should assume all the cost of maintaining and operating Chiawana Park?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
35% 43% 14% 8%
Aquatics Center Sales Tax: To what extent do you support or oppose an increased sales tax of
1/10 of one percent (one extra penny on each %10 purchase) to have a regional aquatic center
in the Tri‐Cities?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
32% 31% 17% 20%
Funds for Pasco School District Programs & Facilities: The City has a history of supporting
Pasco School District programs and facilities with City funds. To what extent do you support or
oppose the City of Pasco continuing to support Pasco School District programs and facilities
with City funds?
Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
63% 27% 3% 7%
Page 97 of 128
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 8, 2021
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/13/21
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolutions - Wehe Water Main & Wrigley Drive Extension Project
Acceptances
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolutions
PowerPoint Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
See below.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Wehe Water Main Project:
The project bid was awarded to Industrial Construction of Washington LLC. of
West Richland, WA on December 28, 2020, in the amount of $158,269.80 by the
City Manager. The project is complete and constructed per specifications. Total
construction costs were $184,292.01, which included change orders in the
amount of $21,263.88. The change orders related to overruns on estimated
quantities in bid items.
Wrigley Drive Extension Project:
The project bid was awarded by Council to Culbert Construction, Inc. o f Pasco,
WA on December 23, 2020, in the amount of $285,000.17. The project is
complete and constructed per specifications. Total construction costs were
$302,289.79, which included change orders in the amount of $20,137.97. The
change orders related to overruns on estimated quantities in bid proposal items.
Page 98 of 128
Formal acceptance of public works projects are required by State law and start
the 45-day period within which an outside vendor, supplier or laborer would have
an opportunity to file a claim against this project pursuant to RCW 60.28.011 (2).
Upon completion of the 45-day lien filing period, retainage being held by the City
may be released upon receipts of the following:
• An affidavit of no liens
• A release from the Department of Revenue that all taxes have been paid
• A release from any claims from the Department of Labor and Industries,
pursuant to RCW 60.28.051
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends the City Council's acceptance of the projects as constructed
by the above listed contractors.
This item is currently scheduled for approval at Council’s September 20, 2021
regular meeting.
Page 99 of 128
Resolution – Water Main Replacement (Wehe) Closeout - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION OF
WASHINGTON, LLC., UNDER CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. 19073,
WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT – ALLEY EAST OF WEHE AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the work performed by Industrial Construction of Washington, LLC., under
contract for the Water Main Replacement – Alley East of Wehe Avenue project, has been
examined by City of Pasco staff and has been found to be in apparent compliance with the
applicable project specifications and drawings; and
WHEREAS, it is the City staff’s recommendation that the Council formally accept the
contractor's work and the project as complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council concurs with the staff’s recommendation and thereby accepts the
work performed by Industrial Construction of Washington, LLC., under contract for the Water
Main Replacement – Alley East of Wehe Avenue project, as being completed in apparent
compliance with the project specifications and drawings; and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance; and
Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to
applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction
of same and verification thereof by the Public Works Director and Finance Director.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of
___________, 2021.
Saul Martinez
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 100 of 128
Resolution – Wrigley Dr. Ext. Project Closeout - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON,
ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY C&E TRENCHING, LLC., UNDER
CONTRACT FOR PROJECT NO. 15009, WRIGLEY DRIVE EXTENSION.
WHEREAS, the work performed by Culbert Construction, Inc., under contract for the
Wrigley Drive Extension project, has been examined by City of Pasco staff and has been found to
be in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings; and
WHEREAS, it is the City Staff’s recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept
the contractor's work and the project as complete.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Council concurs with the Staff’s recommendation and thereby accepts the
work performed by Culbert Construction, Inc., under contract for the Wrigley Drive Extension
project, as being completed in apparent compliance with the project specifications and drawings;
and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance; and
Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to
applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction
of same and verification thereof by the Public Works Director and Finance Director.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this ___ day of
_______________, 2021.
Saul Martinez
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorneys
Page 101 of 128
Pasco City Council Workshop Meeting September 13, 2021Page 102 of 128
Water Main Replacement(Alley East of Wehe)Project - Before
Page 103 of 128
Water Main Replacement(Alley East of Wehe)Project- in-ProgressgjPage 104 of 128
Water Main Replacement(Alley East of Wehe)Project - completed
Page 105 of 128
Change Order DetailsWater Main Replacement (Alley East of Wehe) ($21,263.88)•During construction it was discovered there was no way to tap the existing line so a cut-in tee with 2 adapters was required.•Total Construction Contract cost $184,292.01Page 106 of 128
Wrigley Drive ExtensionProject - Before
Page 107 of 128
Wrigley Drive ExtensionProject- in-progress
Page 108 of 128
Wrigley Drive ExtensionProject - completed
Page 109 of 128
Change Order DetailsWrigley Drive Extension ($20,137.97)•There were revisions needed to existing irrigation; and curbing & grading modifications were necessary to the intersection of Clemente to ensure proper drainage.•Total Construction Contract cost $302KPage 110 of 128
Questions?Page 111 of 128
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 1, 2021
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop
Meeting: 9/13/21
FROM: Zach Ratkai, Director
Administrative & Community Services
SUBJECT: Resolution - Tri-Cities Youth Soccer Association (T-CYSA) Agreement
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Resolution
Proposed T-CYSA Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
No notable fiscal impact. City costs for maintenance of the facility should remain
consistent and compensation from T-CYSA is similar to past years; $44,056 in
2021, increasing 3% annually thereafter.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City and T-CYSA (f.k.a. TCJSA) entered into an 25-year agreement on
February and improvement for providing of purpose the for 1995, 21,
development of approx. 44 acres of property on Burden Blvd. near GESA
Stadium to serve primarily as a soccer complex. The agreement was
subsequently amended on September 6, 2005, for the purpose of updating the
organization’s name to reflect its change from TCJSA to T -CYSA, and for the
purpose of incorporating a 10-year extension option into the agreement.
T-CYSA desires to exercise the 10 year extension.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 112 of 128
In exercising the extension, T-CYSA was amenable to modifying some of the
terms and conditions of the original agreement. As proposed, the amendment
provides:
• The extension of the lease through February 22, 2030.
• The premises shall generally be used for soccer play, including league
play, clinics and tournament play.
• T-CYSA will communicate use-schedule with the City.
• T-CYSA will organize and hold 4th of July Soccer tournament as part of
Grand Old 4th activities and organize/facilitate additional tournaments
throughout the year.
• T-CYSA will submit rental rates with supporting rational to City on a yearly
basis.
• T-CYSA to pay City $44,056 in 2021 increasing 3% annually thereafter.
• City may initiate improvements to the facility without having to terminate
the agreement.
• City may terminate lease without cause by providing 2-years advance
written notice together with depreciated compensation payment for T -
CYSA's cost of development of the premises.
The conditions are acceptable to the T-CYSA, staff recommends Council review
and provide comment as appropriate. The intent is to bring the agreement back
to Council for their consideration at the next available regular meeting.
Page 113 of 128
Resolution – TCYSA Agreement - 1
RESOLUTION NO. _________
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH
TRI-CITIES YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco and Tri-Cities Youth Soccer Association entered into an
agreement on February 21, 1995 for development of 44 acres on Burden Blvd for a soccer
complex; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco and Tri-Cities Youth Soccer amended said agreement on
September 6, 2005 for the purpose of incorporating a 10-year extension option; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco and Tri-Cities Youth Soccer desire to extend said
agreement for an additional ten years and make substantive amendments to the contract,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PASCO, WASHINGTON:
That the City Manager for the City of Pasco is hereby authorized to execute the amended
agreement between the City of Pasco and Tri-Cities Youth Soccer Association.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this _____day of
________________, 2021.
_____________________________
Saul Martinez
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 114 of 128
PdSco I I.
,, AMENDMENT OF AND EXERCISE OF EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT FOR LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PASCO AND TRI-CITIES YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION FIELD SPORTS COMPLEX TmS AMENDED AGREEMENT is entered into on this 1f2._ day of L� , n -\h � .\-2021, by and between the City of Pasco, Washington, a Municipal Corporat�;einafter referred to as "City" and the Tri-Cities Youth Soccer Association (formerly TCJSA), a Washington nonprofit Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "T-CYSA."WHEREAS, the City and the T-CYSA (f.k.a. TCJSA) entered into agreement on February 21, 1995, for the purpose of providing for improvement and development of property to serve primarily as a soccer complex for the educational and youth programs and opportunities for the public and the community as a whole related to soccer as a recreational activity and for major tournament play attracting visitors to Pasco, and, WHEREAS, the City and T-CYSA amended the original agreement on September 6, 2005, for the purpose of updating the organization's name to reflect its change from TCJSA to TCYSA, and for the purpose of incorporating a 10-year extension option into the agreement, and, WHEREAS, T-CYSA has a desire now to exercise the 10-year extension option included in the 2005 amended agreement, THEREFORE, The City and T-CYSA do hereby agree to exercise the 10-year·extension option and amend the agreement as follows to reflect the understanding and agreement of the parties: In consideration of the mutual terms, covenants, conditions, promises and representations contained herein, the parties do promise, agree and provide the following: 1.Term. All rights and obligations under this agreement, unless othetwise stated herein,shall terminate effective February 22, 2030, unless earlier terminated as set forth inSection 12 below. "Term" shall mean the period between execution of this agreementand its termination as provided. Unless otherwise stated in this agreement, thisagreement may be altered, modified, extended or terminated prior to that date only uponexecution by all of the parties or an instrument to that effect. At the termination of thisagreement extension, if the city desires to enter into another lease agreement for themanagement of the complex, and if T-CYSA is in good standing and not in breach oftheir agreement, T-CYSA shall be given priority when accepting management proposalsfor the new lease agreement.2.Improvements. The parties acknowledge that T-CYSA has developed the premises withmultiple soccer fields, one (I) of which is a championship field with potential for lightsand seating (berm initially) arrangements suitable for championship and tournament play.Amended Agreement for Land Use & Development/ Soccer Complex
- 1
Page 115 of 128
In addition, T-CYSA has caused to be constructed a restroom/concession stand and out
building on the complex.
The City shall furnish the premises, at its cost and expense, with the necessary utilities,
including electrical power, domestic water service, and domestic sewer. The City shall
also provide irrigation water service for the premises. As agreed in the 2005 amended
agreement, T-CYSA shall continue to pay for monthly electricity use and the City shall
pay for monthly water and sewer use. In addition, irrigation water for the system shall be
provided to the premises/complex by the City at its cost and expense. At the end of the
lease term or in the event that this lease is terminated with or without cause as set forth in
Section 12, hereof, all improvements made to or installed on the premises by the T-
CYSA as provided for herein, except trade fixtures and moveable personal property (i.e.
goals, equipment, etc.), shall become the property of the City.
The City and T-CYSA acknowledge that Visit Tri-Cities, with the support of the City,
Richland, and Kennewick in 2019, initiated and completed a regional Sports Facilities
Market Analysis & Feasibility Study. The City and T-CYSA further acknowledge that
the recommendations stemming from that study call for specific improvements to the
premises. In the event the City, either in partnership with or separate from T-CYSA or
other Youth Soccer Organization, decides to initiate substantial improvements at the
premises, including, but not limited to those set forth in the prior mentioned Sports
Facility Feasibility Study, the City will inform T-CYSA of that decision not less than 60
days prior to the commencement of design work AND not less than one ( 1) year prior to
the commencement of construction. As T-CYSA originally developed the Premises, they
will have first right of refusal, should the City initiate said improvements in a partnership
with a Youth Soccer Organization partner.
3. Maintenance. The maintenance of the facility shall be performed as follows; T-CYSA
shall repair and perform all improvements made to the concession/restroom building.
They shall perform all painting/lining of the soccer fields as needed throughout each
season, and shall replace and be responsible for all maintenance of soccer field equipment
such as goals, nets, comer flags, etc. The maintenance of the building and restrooms shall
be the responsibility of and the sole expense of the T-CYSA. The City shall perform all
other maintenance and repair of all improvements made to the premises and they shall be
performed by and at the sole expense of the City. Maintenance and repair schedules and
needs of the fields shall be in accordance with maintenance and repair standards,
schedules and plans mutually adopted and agreed upon by the parties hereto.
4. Use of the Premises. The premises shall generally be used for soccer play, including
league play, clinics and tournament play. The fields at the complex shall be considered
game fields and as such, use of the fields for practice by T-CYSA or any other
organization shall be at the discretion of T-CYSA and should be minimized to prevent
undue wear and tear. The City maintains the right to close specific fields down
completely and/or stop their use for practice purposes should the City determine the field
condition has been compromised due to overuse. Although the fields should primarily be
used for soccer purposes, they shall be open to other uses upon agreement between T-
Amended Agreement for Land Use & Development/ Soccer Complex
-2
Page 116 of 128
CYSA and the City, if it is determined that said use will not cause undo damage to the
turf or the facility, and that it will not conflict with other previously scheduled use. The
T-CYSA as managers of the facility shall maintain the schedule. T-CYSA programs shall
have priority over other persons or groups for use of the premises for its league and
tournament play. T-CYSA on or about February 15 and August 15 of each year, must
provide to the City a copy of all scheduled field use for the next six months. An 8-week
shut down of all fields must be included in the schedule. The shutdown shall not limit the
ability to set up or tear down fields by T-CYSA staff and T-CYSA will, as determined
and coordinated with the City, remove all equipment from the fields to minimize
obstruction during the maintenance period.
To better serve its patrons T-CYSA may place portable toilets in mutually agreed upon
locations within the complex. T-CYSA will annually review and confirm with contracted
portable toilet vendor, the route that is to be used to service the units as determined by the
City. If in the course of its duties of management of the facility T-CYSA desires to bring
in other temporary equipment, such as portable field lighting, etc. T-CYSA will first
check with the City to confirm it can be placed, maintained and removed with minimal or
no damage to the fields. They will also check with both T-CYSA and the City's insurance
providers to ensure coverage will not be jeopardized.
Note: T-CYSA and the City each will have the right to ban organizations from use of the
fields for documented failure to abide by the rules of use and/or destruction of property.
At the beginning of each new calendar year, T-CYSA shall submit to the City a field
rental rate menu reflective of service provided and include a breakdown of the costs as
backup and justification of the proposed rates. Rental rates shall be reflective of rates
charged by other comparable facilities and in line with industry standards. No rental fees
will be charged the City for their use of the facility.
To aid in communication, understanding and field maintenance coordination, each season
T-CYSA shall provide the City a diagram of the configuration of all fields at the complex
indicating each field's assigned field number.
Parties shall not use the premises in any manner that will increase risks occurred by
insurance on the premises and result in an increase in the rate of insurance or a
cancellation of any insurance policy, even if such use may be in furtherance of the
primary purpose.
Parties shall not allow any waste or nuisance on the premises, or use, or allow the
premises to be used for any unlawful purposes.
T-CYSA further agrees to organize and/or work with outside tournament directors, with
the intent to hold at least two (2) major soccer tournaments per year with the primary
purpose of bringing in out-of-town teams. These tournaments shall take place sometime
between the months of March and October. Separately T-CYSA shall work with the City
and Visit-Tri Cities to host 1-2 other regional soccer tournaments each year. In
Amended Agreement for Land Use & Development/ Soccer Complex
-3
Page 117 of 128
conjunction with the City as part of the Grand Old 4th of July Celebration T-CYSA shall
run a soccer tournament, which may serve as one of the major or regional tournaments
previously mentioned. All revenues collected by T-CYSA during these tournaments, i.e.
tournament entry fees, team fees, player fees, and concession revenue shall, except as
otherwise stated herein, belong to the T-CYSA for its uses and purposes. Should the City
hold soccer tournaments or events of its own at the facility, revenues therefrom shall
belong to the City, with concession stand revenues subject to addendum and special
agreement, as the case may be, since the T-CYSA has sole control and responsibility
therefore. Such tournaments and/or events held by the City must be coordinated with T-
CYSA and be mutually agreed upon.
S. Parking. The T-CYSA shall have the right to use the parking lot at the adjacent
professional baseball complex for its coaches, spectators, team members and officials and
shall make all reasonable efforts to avoid conflicts between special stadium events and T-
CYSA soccer events for stadium parking.
For its events, T-CYSA may provide parking attendants and collect a parking fee. The
fee shall be a fee in an amount established by T-CYSA. All parking fees collected shall
be the exclusive property of T-CYSA. To better coordinate events and accommodate
parking in the area, T-CYSA will give a minimum thirty (30) days' notice, ofT-CYSA's
intent to collect parking fees, to both with the Minor League Baseball Team housed at the
baseball Stadium and to the City's Recreation Services Manager.
The placement of a parking attendant at the neighboring Softball complex must be
coordinated with the City and, in the event a Softball Tournament is taking place on the
same day, the parking attendant must direct all soccer event attendees to the Baseball
Stadium parking lot.
6. Payment to the City. Beginning in 2021, T-CYSA shall pay to the City, as partial
compensation for maintenance of the soccer fields, the sum of $44,056. Thereafter, the
annual payment shall be increased by 3% per year through the end of the tenn.
7. Development Permits. Because the City is the owner of the property, it agrees to make
application for all necessary pennits, which may be required for any further development
of the complex.
8. Indemnification. In addition to any other indemnities provided by this agreement, and
to the extent pennitted by law, each party ("indemnifying party") shall, at its sole cost
and expense, indemnify and save hannless the other, and their respective agents, officers,
or employees ("indemnities") against and from all claims asserted against the other party
or their respective indemnities by reason of any work or things done or not done in, on, or
about the premises or the improvements made in connection with the indemnifying
party's construction, development, maintenance or repair obligations under Sections 2
and 3 of this agreement.
Amended Agreement for Land Use & Development/ Soccer Complex
-4
Page 118 of 128
Each party ("indemnifying party") agrees at its sole cost and expense, and to the extent
permitted by law, to indemnify and defend the other party and their respective
indemnities and hold them harmless from all claims, arising from or as a consequence of
the rights granted to or obligations incurred by the indemnifying party under this
agreement, the use of the premises by the indemnifying party or the operation, alteration,
maintenance or removal of the improvements by the indemnifying party. It is the intent
of this paragraph that each indemnifying party shall indemnify the other party with
respect to all claims arising out of the indemnifying party's use, activities, and/or
occupancy of the premises. The provisions of this section shall survive beyond the terms
of this agreement for occurrences which occur during the term.
9. Liens. The T-CYSA shall not create or permit to be created or to remain, and shall
discharge as provided in this paragraph, any liens, encumbrance, or charge levied on
account of any mechanics, laborers, or materialmen, or otherwise (collectively, "a lien")
which might be or become a lien, encumbrance or charge upon the premises.
10. Insurance. The City represents that it is a self-insured public entity and a member of a
self-insurance pool of municipalities (Washington Cities Insurance Authority). The T-
CYSA shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damage to property, which may arise from or in
connection with the performance of any and all activities hereunder by T-CYSA, its
agents, representatives, or employees.
Minimum Scope of Insurance. T-CYSA shall obtain insurance of the types described
below:
Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form
CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, personal
injury, advertising injury, activities of T-CYSA and activities of independent
teams who are participating with or competing against T-CYSA. The City shall
be named as an additional insured under T-CYSA's Commercial General Liability
insurance policy with respect to the activities ofT-CYSA under this Agreement.
Minimum Amounts oflnsurance. T-CYSA shall maintain the following insurance limits:
Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than:
181 $2,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate; OR • $ ____ each occurrence; and $. ____ general aggregate
Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to
contain, the following provisions for Commercial General Liability insurance:
T-CYSA's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City.
Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City
shall be excess ofT-CYSA's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Amended Agreement for Land Use & Development/ Soccer Complex
-5
Page 119 of 128
T-CYSA's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be
cancelled, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail,
return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best rating of not less than A:VII.
Verification of Coverage. T-CYSA shall furnish the City with original certificates and a
copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the
additional insured endorsement, evidencing full satisfaction of the insurance requirements
ofT-CYSA before commencement of any activities hereunder.
No Limitation. T-CYSA's procurement and maintenance of insurance as required by this
Agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of T-CYSA to the coverage
provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy
available at law or in equity.
11. Fee for Use of Premises. In the event that either the City or T-CYSA, intends to impose
any fee or rental for the use of the premises by any other organization it shall first secure
an indemnity agreement from the potential user holding both the City and T-CYSA
harmless against all claims, losses and expenses in connection with such user's use of the
premises and further, shall secure a certificate of insurance, comparable to the limits set
forth in Section 10 of this agreement, naming both the City and T-CYSA as additional
insureds under such policy of the potential users. This restriction is intended to protect
the parties from liability through the provisions of the State Recreational Land Use
Immunity Statutes. This provision shall not preclude the fees charged by either party for
general registration or tournament entry.
12. Early Termination.
1. Without Cause. Either party may terminate this agreement for any reason by
giving the other party two (2) years advance written notice of its intention to
terminate to the other party. Should termination by the City occur herein under,
the amount of compensation due T-CYSA shall be 20% of the determined or
agreed 2007 replacement cost exclusive of land acquisition as set forth in the
2005 amended agreement, then for each year thereafter the amount of
compensation shall be reduced by three percent (3%) per year for the remaining
years of this agreement.
2. With Cause. Should T-CYSA be found in breach of this agreement, notifications
will be sent via certified mail to the address and contact information listed in
section 16 below. Notification will be considered delivered upon receipt of
certified delivery slip or 3 days after postmark date. T-CYSA will have 30 days
from notification to remedy breach to City's satisfaction, if unwilling to rectify
breach; agreement will terminate in 6 months without compensation to T-CYSA.
Amended Agreement for Land Use & Development/ Soccer Complex
-6
Page 120 of 128
13. Dispute Resolution. This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been
made and entered into and delivered within the State of Washington and it is agreed by
each party hereto that the laws of the State of Washington shall govern this Agreement.
In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default, or interpretation of
this Agreement, the Project Administrators, or their designees, shall first meet in a good
faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the event the dispute cannot be resolved by
agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be resolved by arbitration pursuant to RCW
7 .04A, as amended, with both parties waiving the right of a jury trial upon trial de novo,
with venue placed in Pasco, Franklin County, Washington. The substantially prevailing
party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs as additional award and
judgment against the other.
14. Remedies. Each of the parties shall have all remedies available by law or in equity,
including specific performance, to force any obligation of the other party to this
agreement. However, except as provided in this agreement, (Sectionl2) termination of
this agreement shall not be available as a remedy for any party.
15. No Waiver. No failure by any party to insist upon the strict performance of any
covenant, agreement, promise, term or condition of this agreement or to exercise any
right or remedy consequent upon any breach shall constitute a waiver of any breach of a
covenant, agreement, promise term or condition.
16. Notices. All notices required or permitted under this agreement shall be in writing and
shall be served upon the parties in person or by certified or registered mail (return receipt
requested) directed to the addresses set forth below or addresses designated by a party
pursuant to written notice. Any notice so mailed shall be effective three (3) days after
mailing. All changes of address shall be effective upon written notice in the fashion
provided by this section
City of Pasco, ACS Director
Pasco City Hall
525 N. 3rd
P.O. Box293
Pasco, Washington 99301
Tri-Cities Youth Soccer Association
President
6160 Burden Blvd
Pasco, WA 99301
17. Assignment. The T-CYSA shall not assign this agreement or any rights hereunder to any
person, entity, or organization without the written permission of the City. This agreement
is personal to the parties.
18. Entire Agreement. This agreement, including the exhibits, contains all the promises,
agreements, conditions, inducements and understandings between the parties relative to
the premises and there are no promises, agreements, conditions, inducements,
understandings, warranties or representations oral or written expressed or implied,
between them other than as set forth herein.
Amended Agreement for Land Use & Development/ Soccer Complex
-7
Page 121 of 128
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have signed this Agreement on the date set forth
above.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
By:. ________ _
Signature: City Manager
Name: _________ _
Printed
Approved as to Form:
Kerr Ferguson Law PLLC
City Attorney
Name: <;"�e h(lf\� !\tef fleY-
Printed
Amended Agreement for Land Use & Development/ Soccer Complex
- 8
Page 122 of 128
QUALITY OF LIFE
Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re-
investment in community infrastructure by:
• Using Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and other public and private capital to
revitalize older neighborhoods and safe routes to essential services.
• Continuing efforts toward designing, siting, programming needs, and site selection for a
community center and pursuing acquisition of land for future community park.
• Developing Phase I of the A Street Sporting Complex and continue efforts to provide additional
soccer and sports fields.
• Coordinating with the Pasco Public Facilities District to develop a public education campaign,
financial analysis and prepare a ballot measure concerning the development of a regional aquatic
facility for consideration by the people.
• Completing construction of a new animal control facility.
• Ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and effectiveness of public resources in the delivery of
municipal services, programs, and long-term maintenance and viability of public facilities.
• Collaborating with the Inclusion, Diversity and Equity Commission and community leaders to
enhance engagement efforts and organizational cultural competency.
• Updating design standards for the development of new neighborhoods and re-development to
promote greater neighborhood cohesion through design elements, e.g.: walkability, aesthetics,
sustainability, and community gathering spaces.
• Updating Parks and Facilities Comprehensive Plan to include: public facilities inventory, needs
assessment, level of service, and centers evaluation.
• Teaming with local and regional partners to develop a Housing Action Plan with a focus on strategies
that emphasize affordable housing.
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY
Enhance the long-term financial viability, value, and service levels of services and programs, including:
• Regular evaluation of services and programs to confirm importance to community, adequacy, and
cost-benefit.
• Continuation of cost of service and recovery targets in evaluating City services.
• Ongoing evaluation of costs, processes and performance associated with delivery of City services
including customer feedback and satisfaction, staffing, facilities, and partnership opportunities.
• Instilling and promoting an organizational culture of customer service across all business lines.
• Updating policies relating to urbanization of the unincorporated islands to assure consistency with
long-range planning, community safety, and fiscal sustainability.
City Council Goals 2020-2021
Page 123 of 128
COMMUNITY SAFETY
Preserve past improvements and promote future gains by:
• Developing a Comprehensive Police Strategic Master Plan through a transparent process to evaluate
future service levels of the department to assure sustainability, public safety, and crime control over
the next 5-10 years.
• Collaborating with regional and community partners to evaluate and implement strategies to
reduce the incidence of homelessness.
• Leveraging and expanding partnerships to maintain and enhance behavioral health services to
community members in crisis being assisted by police and fire.
• Continuing efforts to improve police and community relations.
• Working to achieve and maintain target fire response times through operational improvements and
long-range strategic planning of facilities and staffing.
• Focusing on the long-term goal of sustaining a Washington State Rating Bureau Class 3 community
rating.
• Leveraging infrastructure database of sidewalks, streetlights and pavement conditions along with
evaluating policies and methods to address needs and inequities.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK
Promote a highly-functional multi-modal transportation network through:
• Commencement and completion of construction of the Lewis Street Overpass project.
• Continued emphasis on improvements in Road 68/I-182/Burden Blvd. corridor to improve operation
and safety.
• Data-driven pro-active neighborhood traffic calming efforts.
• Continued collaboration with Ben Franklin Transit to enhance mobility and access.
• Completion of a Transportation System Master Plan and utilization of its recommendations to
develop policies, regulations, programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic
investment, mobility, multi-modal systems, accessibility, efficiency and safety.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
Promote and encourage economic vitality by supporting:
• Downtown revitalization efforts of Downtown Pasco Development Authority (DPDA), post-COVID
restart, and City initiatives such as Downtown Master Plan process and sign code modifications.
• The construction of Peanuts Park and Farmers Market and continued efforts to pursue streetscape
and gateway upgrades.
• The completion of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update and Broadmoor Master Plan efforts,
adoption of Urban Growth Area expansion alternative, implementation of adopted long-range
planning efforts with appropriate analysis and adoption of planning actions including: zoning code
changes, phased sign code update, and development regulations and standards.
• Increased efforts to promote the community as a desirable place for commercial and industrial
development by promoting small business outreach and assistance, predictability in project review,
and excellent customer service.
• Partnerships and encouragement of Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to facilitate
development of the remaining state-owned properties at Road 68/I-182.
Page 124 of 128
• Continued coordination with the Port of Pasco to complete and implement a waterfront-zoning
plan and provide for public infrastructure.
• Active partnerships in the planning and development of strategies to promote tourism and
deployment of assets to spur economic activity.
• In concert with community partners, development of a comprehensive economic development
plan.
COMMUNITY IDENTITY
Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion and image through:
• Continued efforts of community surveying through traditional methods and the application of new
technologies.
• Providing opportunities for community engagement through boards, commissions, volunteer
opportunities, social media, forums, and other outlets.
• Enhanced inter-agency and constituent coordination developed during the pandemic.
• Continued efforts of the community identity/image enhancement campaign to include promotion
of community and organizational successes.
• Enhanced participation and support of cultural events occurring within the community.
• Support of the Arts and Culture Commission in promoting unity and the celebration of diversity
through art and culture programs.
For more information, visit www.pasco-wa.gov/councilgoals
Page 125 of 128
CALIDAD DE VIDA
Promover una vida de buena calidad a través de programas de calidad, servicios e inversiones y
reinversiones adecuadas en la infraestructura de la comunidad al:
• Utilizar una Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (Concesión de Ayuda Federal para el
Desarrollo Comunitario) y otro capital público y privado para renovar las vecindades antiguas y las
rutas seguras a los servicios esenciales.
• Continuar los esfuerzos hacia el diseño, las obras de construcción, las necesidades programáticas, y
la elección de dichas obras de construcción, para un centro comunitario y comprar el terreno para
un futuro parque comunitario.
• Desarrollar la 1era Fase del Sporting Complex (Complejo Deportivo) de la Calle A y continuar los
esfuerzos de proporcionar más campos de fútbol y de otros deportes.
• Coordinar con el Pasco Public Facilities District (Distrito de las Instalaciones Públicas de Pasco) para
desarrollar una campaña de educación pública, un análisis financiero, y preparar una propuesta
sobre el desarrollo de una instalación acuática regional para que sea considerada por el público.
• Terminar la construcción de una nueva instalación para el control de animales.
• Continuar los esfuerzos para mejorar la eficiencia y la eficacia de los recursos públicos en la entrega
de servicios municipales, programas, y el mantenimiento y la viabilidad a largo plazo de
instalaciones públicas.
• Colaborar con la Inclusion, Diversity and Equity Commission (Comisión de Inclusión, Diversidad, y
Equidad) y con los líderes comunitarios para mejorar los esfuerzos de participación y la capacidad
cultural organizacional.
• Actualizar los estándares de diseño para el desarrollo de nuevas vecindades y el redesarrollo para
promover más cohesión de las vecindades a través de elementos de diseño, p. ej.: viabilidad peatonal,
evaluación de las necesidades, sustentabilidad, y lugares donde se puedan reunir los miembros de
la comunidad.
• Actualizar el Parks and Facilities Comprehensive Plan (Plan Comprehensivo de los Parques y las
Instalaciones) para que incluya: un inventario de instalaciones públicas, una evaluación de las
necesidades, el nivel de servicio, y la evaluación del centro.
• Trabajar en equipo con colaboradores regionales para desarrollar un Housing Action Plan (Plan de
Acción para Viviendas) con un enfoque en las estrategias que enfatizan viviendas económicas.
SUSTENTABILIDAD FINANCIERA
Mejorar la sustentabilidad financiera a largo plazo, el valor, y los niveles de servicios y programas,
incluyendo:
• La evaluación regular de los servicios y de los programas para confirmar la importancia de la
comunidad, la capitalización adecuada, y el costo-beneficio.
Metas del Concilio de la
Ciudad del 2020-2021
Page 126 of 128
• La continuación del costo por el servicio y de las metas de recuperación al evaluar los servicios de la
Ciudad.
• La evaluación continua de los costos, los procesos y el desempeño relacionado con la entrega de los
servicios de la Ciudad incluyendo la retroalimentación y la satisfacción del cliente, el personal, las
instalaciones, y las oportunidades colaborativas.
• Inculcar y promover una cultura organizacional de servicio al cliente a lo largo de todas las líneas de
negocio.
• Actualizar las políticas relacionadas con la urbanización de las islas no incorporadas para asegurar
consistencia con la planificación a largo plazo, la seguridad comunitaria, y la sustentabilidad fiscal.
SEGURIDAD COMUNITARIA
Preservar las mejorías anteriores y promover las ganancias futuras al:
• Desarrollar un Comprehensive Police Strategic Master Plan (Plan Maestro Estratégico
Comprehensivo Policial) a través de un proceso transparente para evaluar los niveles futuros de
servicio del departamento para asegurar sustentabilidad, seguridad pública, y control de crímenes
durante los siguientes 5-10 años.
• Trabajar con colaboradores regionales y comunitarios para evaluar e implementar estrategias para
reducir los casos de personas sin techo.
• Hacer uso y ampliar las colaboraciones para mantener y mejorar los servicios de salud conductual a
los miembros de la comunidad que se encuentran en medio de una crisis, ayudados por la policía y
por los bomberos.
• Continuar los esfuerzos para mejorar la relación con la policía y con la comunidad.
• Trabajar para lograr y mantener el tiempo de reacción de los bomberos a través de mejorías
operacionales y la planificación estratégica de instalaciones y personal a largo plazo.
• Enfocarse en la meta a largo plazo de mantener una clasificación de la comunidad Clase 3 del
Washington State Rating Bureau (Departamento de Clasificación del Estado de Washington).
• Utilizar la base de datos de la infraestructura de las banquetas, los faroles, y las condiciones del
pavimento, como también evaluar las políticas y los métodos para tratar las necesidades y las
injusticias.
RED DE TRANSPORTE COMUNITARIO
Promover una red de transporte extremadamente funcional y multimodal a través de:
• El comienzo y el término de la construcción del proyecto Lewis Street Overpass.
• El énfasis continuo en las mejorías de la ruta Road 68/I-182/Burden Blvd. para mejorar la operación y
la seguridad.
• Los esfuerzos proactivos basados en datos para calmar el tráfico en las vecindades.
• La colaboración continua con Ben Franklin Transit para mejorar la movilidad y el acceso.
• El término del Transportation System Master Plan (Plan Maestro del Sistema de Transporte) y la
utilización de sus recomendaciones para desarrollar políticas, reglas, programas, y proyectos que
proporcionan más conectividad, inversiones estratégicas, movilidad, sistemas multimodales,
accesibilidad, eficiencia, y seguridad.
Page 127 of 128
VITALIDAD ECONOMICA
Promover y motivar la vitalidad económica al apoyar:
• Los esfuerzos de renovación de la Downtown Pasco Development Authority (DPDA) (Autoridad de
Desarrollo del Centro de Pasco), el reinicio después de COVID, y las iniciativas de la Ciudad como el
proceso del Downtown Master Plan (Plan Maestro del Centro) y las modificaciones de los códigos de
anuncios.
• La construcción del Peanuts Park and Farmers Market (Parque Peanuts y el Mercado) y los esfuerzos
continuos para discutir paisajes urbanos y actualizaciones de entradas.
• El término de los esfuerzos de la Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update (Actualización
Comprehensiva del Uso de Terrenos) y los esfuerzos del Broadmoor Master Plan (Plan Maestro de
Broadmoor), la adopción de la alternativa de la expansión de Urban Growth Area (Área del
Crecimiento Urbano), la implementación de los esfuerzos de planificación a largo plazo con los
análisis adecuados y la adopción de acciones de planificación incluyendo: los cambios a los códigos
de zonas, la actualización de los códigos de los anuncios de las fases, y el desarrollo de las reglas y los
estándares.
• Más esfuerzos para promover a la comunidad como un lugar atractivo para el desarrollo comercial
e industrial al fomentar el alcance y la ayuda a los negocios pequeños, la predictibilidad en la
revisión de proyectos, y un excelente servicio al cliente.
• Las colaboraciones y la motivación del Department of Natural Resources (DNR) (Departamento de
Recursos Naturales) para facilitar el desarrollo de las propiedades restantes del estado en Road 68/I-
182.
• La coordinación continua con el Port of Pasco (Puerto de Pasco) para terminar e implementar un
plan de zonas costeras y proporcionar una infraestructura pública.
• Las colaboraciones activas en la planificación y el desarrollo de estrategias para promover el turismo
y la utilización de recursos para estimular actividad económica.
• Junto con los colaboradores de la comunidad, crear un plan comprehensivo de desarrollo
económico.
IDENTIDAD COMUNITARIA
Identificar oportunidades para mejorar la identidad comunitaria, la cohesión, y la imagen a través de:
• Los esfuerzos continuos para evaluar a la comunidad a través de los métodos tradicionales y la
aplicación de nuevas tecnologías.
• Proporcionar oportunidades para la involucración comunitaria a través de mesas directivas,
comisiones, oportunidades para voluntarios, medios sociales, foros, y otros medios.
• Una mejor coordinación entre las agencias y los constituyentes desarrollada durante la pandémica.
• Los esfuerzos continuos de campañas para la mejoría de la identidad/imagen comunitaria que
promuevan a la comunidad y a los éxitos organizacionales.
• Una mejor participación y apoyo de los eventos culturales llevados a cabo dentro de la comunidad.
• El apoyo de la Arts and Culture Commission (Comisión de Artes y Cultura) al promover la unidad y
celebrar la diversidad a través de programas de arte y cultura.
Para más información, visite www.pasco-wa.gov/councilgoals
Page 128 of 128