Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.03.22 Council Workshop Packet AGENDA City Council Workshop Meeting 7:00 PM - Monday, March 22, 2021 GoToWebinar Page 1. REMOTE MEETING INSTRUCTIONS - The Pasco City Council Workshops are broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive and on the City’s Facebook page at www.facebook.com/cityofPasco. Call-in information to GoToWebinar for "listen-only" mode is: (562) 247-8422 and use access code 465-398-545. 2. CALL TO ORDER 3. ROLL CALL (a) Pledge of Allegiance 4. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS 5. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 3 - 33 (a) Tourism Promotion Area Reserve Fund Request 34 - 69 (b) Transportation Planning Efforts 70 - 90 (c) Ordinance - PMC Amendment Related to Lot Size Averaging (MF# CA2020-002) 91 - 96 (d) Carryover Funds for Capital Projects from 2019-2020 Biennium 6. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION 8. ADJOURNMENT Page 1 of 99 9. ADDITIONAL NOTES 97 - 99 (a) Adopted 2020-2021 Council Goals (Reference Only) (b) REMINDERS • Monday, March 22, 4:00 PM: Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Advisory Committee Meeting – Ben Franklin Transit Main Conference Room (COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Rep.) • Thursday, March 25, 4:00 PM: TRIDEC Board Meeting – 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd., Kennewick (COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER CRAIG MALONEY. Alt.) • Thursday, March 25, 5:30 PM: Benton Franklin Community Action Connections Board Meeting – 720 Court Street, Pasco (COUNCILMEMBER ZAHRA ROACH, Rep.; MAYOR SAUL MARTINEZ, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad. (Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability.) Page 2 of 99 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 16, 2021 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 3/22/21 FROM: Adam Lincoln, Deputy City Manager Executive SUBJECT: Tourism Promotion Area Reserve Fund Request I. REFERENCE(S): Letter from Visit Tri-Cities dated March 10, 2021 2020 Annual Report PowerPoint Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation by Michael Novakavich, President and CEO, Visit Tri-Cities III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Visit Tri-Cities has provided an annual report for the prior year plus an outline of the current year work plan. Michael Novakovich, President and CEO will present the reports, as well as a request for approva l to spend from the Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) Reserve Account. The TPA was formed in late 2004 to generate and administer the proceeds of a "per room night assessment" on hotels/motels in the Tri -Cities, imposed by the hotels themselves. The interlocal agreement (between Pasco, Kennewick and Richland), that created the TPA, requires the annual budget, and any expenditures from the TPA reserve account, to first be approved by the City Councils. V. DISCUSSION: The TPA "assessment" is remitted by the hotels to the State which, in turn, distributes it to the City in which it was collected. The City is obligated to pass Page 3 of 99 the funds to the TPA for use, in accordance with the approved budget. The TPA Commission has voted unanimously to request the transfer of an additional $345,250 for special project expenditures for 2021 from the reserve account for the following: • DestinationNEXT Assessment and Strategic Planning - $35,000 • TBEX Promoting the Tri-Cities - $11,250 • Grants for Tourism Businesses Participate in SkyNav - $50,000 • Visiting Friends and Relatives (VRF) Digital Campaign - $19,000 • Billboard Advertising the Heart of Washington Wine Country - $50,000 • San Diego Campaign to Support new Direct Flight - $40,000 • Consumer Sentiment Study - $50,000 • Social Media Influencer - $20,000 • Top Recording Artist Licensing - $70,000 Council may approve the additional allocations of the reserve account or indicate changes necessary to gain approval. Page 4 of 99 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd., Suite B Kennewick, WA 99336 509-735-8486 1-800-254-5824 www.VisitTRI-CITIES.com info@VisitTRI-CITIES.com March 10, 2021 Mr. Dave Zabell City of Pasco P.O. Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 Dear Mr. Zabell: Thank you for the opportunity to present the Visit Tri-Cities 2020 Annual Report, 2021 Work Plan and to make a request to utilize Tourism Promotion Area reserve funds to the Pasco City Council on Monday, March 22, 2021. On behalf of the Tri-City Regional Hotel-Motel Commission, Visit Tri-Cities would like to request the transfer of $345,250 from Tourism Promotion Area Reserve Account to be used for supplemental tourism related projects. We prepare the Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) budget in July of each year for the following calendar year. As is the case with most every budget process, there are always more worthy projects to be considered than funds to support them. We manage our resources carefully to ensure our expenses never exceed our projected income and we budget conservatively. As a result, the TPA Commissioners have identified $518,268 in funds available for reinvestment in tourism related projects. The funds available for project investment are in addition to the minimum reserve requirement of $500,000, the amount set based on the recommendation of the City Managers who participate in at Commission meetings as Ex- Officios. It is the Commission’s position that once the reserve account reaches this level, that any additional funds should actively be used to promote the Tri Cities as a destination; creating increased visitor spending in the community. The projects under consideration accomplish that goal. Given that the balance of the Tourism Promotion Area Reserve Account exceeds the level of $500,000; the Commissioners of the Tri-City Regional Hotel-Motel Commission have voted in favor of re-investing the surplus revenues, in the amount of $345,250 that will help tourism related projects including digital advertising campaigns and promotions to increase leisure travel stays and secure new conventions and sports tournaments, a partnership with local tourism businesses for a virtual tour, strategic planning platform, and destination brand research. A summary of the projects and the associated expenditures is attached for your review. Again, thank you for your consideration and support of the tourism industry. I am available for any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, Michael Novakovich, CDME President and CEO Enclosure Page 5 of 99 1 2021 Proposed TPA Reserve Reinvestments DestinationNEXT Assessment and Strategic Planning: $35,000 DestinationNEXT is a robust version of SWOT analysis that provides destinations with practical actions and strategies for sustainable success. This is achieved via stakeholder interviews and an assessment of the destination. This tool provides the foundation for the successful development of a Strategic Plan, which outlines the overarching goals for the organization for the next three years. Together, these processes make the connection between the visitor economy, economic development and community well-being resulting in increased impact for the benefit of all stakeholders. TBEX Promoting the Tri-Cities $11,250 The Tri-Cities has been selected to host the TBEX North America 2021 Conference, August 16-19. Hosting a successful TBEX conference will help aid in our community’s recovery post pandemic by bringing in new visitors to our area. This is a prestigious event and will help put a spotlight on the Tri-Cities. The TBEX Conference is expected to bring in approximately 400 content creators into the region. Prior host destinations have indicated that hosting TBEX delivers between 5 to 20 years of their normal press trip impact. Local engagement between the participants and our business community will be vital to the success of the event. A retargeting digital campaign will allow VTC to advertise directly to participants and spectators of this event resulting in future visitations and stories. The digital retargeting campaign will run at the conclusion of the event for four weeks. Grants for Tourism Businesses Participate in SkyNav $50,000 VTC has partnered with SkyNav to produce a state-of-the-art virtual tour. SkyNav offers exclusive partner pricing for local businesses wanting a more prominent presence on the platform. Package pricing is up to $2,399 per tour based on 1-9 partner buy-ins. With 10 or more partner buy-ins, package pricing is up to $1,999. The grant would pay 50% of the fee for up to 50 tourism-related businesses that choose to participate in the partner buy-in option with SkyNav. A cost sharing program provides an opportunity for businesses to participate that otherwise could not afford the full cost. Increasing the number of local restaurants, attractions and hotels will result in a more robust and compelling tour and enhance the visitor experience. Visiting Friends and Relatives (VRF) Digital Campaign $19,000 This is an in-market campaign targeting residents. The campaign would be intended to promote SkyNav, an online interactive and immersive platform highlighting amenities in the Tri-Cities. Residents would be encouraged to take advantage of SkyNav and use it as a tool to invite of friends and relatives to visit the Tri-Cities and stay in one of the area’s hotels. The campaign would run mid-May through mid-December. Page 6 of 99 2 Billboard Advertising the Heart of Washington Wine Country $50,000 Focusing on an authentic wine country experiences, Visit Tri-Cities would secure billboards at key points along arterial highways from other popular wine destinations. Cost varies by location and requires a minimum 4-week commitment for each billboard. VTC is developing a funding strategy to partner with the local wine industry to share costs to fund the campaign. San Diego Campaign to Support new Direct Flight $40,000 A non-stop flight from San Diego to Tri-Cities will begin in late May 2021. There is an opportunity to target potential visitors in the San Diego area who are interested in (Washington) wine and wide-open spaces. A digital campaign beginning May – September would promote the region as a premier wine destination. A successful non-stop flight to a new market would also potentially provide opportunities for non-stop flights in new geographic markets. Consumer Sentiment Study $50,000 Visit Tri-Cities would contract with a company to provide destination brand research to include primary destination drivers as well as barriers and deterrents from visitation. This is essential information in developing strategic marketing campaigns. The final report would contain audience Identification and persona research, ROI (website, social, VG), Visitor Profiles, Marketing Asset Evaluation, and meetings market studies. Social Media Influencer $20,000 Social Media Influencers/Social Media Takeovers are a new tactic to support Visit Tri-Cities’ other marketing efforts. Social Media Influencers have already established trust with a dedicated audience. Contracting with qualified, social influencers with a travel focus with the capacity to tell an authentic story about their Tri-Cities visit will reinforce the VTC branded marketing messages. Top Recording Artist Licensing $70,000 Licensing of a top recording artist’s popular song for a "derivative work". Visit Tri-Cities would like to create original lyrics using the artist’s music to aid in the economic recovery of our region. 30-sec or possibly 60- sec version. Similar to Alaska Airlines parody of Men without Hats’ Safety Dance. Total All Requests: $345,250 Page 7 of 99 Page 8 of 99 ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION •2020 State of the •2021 Work Plan •TPA Reserve Request Tourism Industry Page 9 of 99 Page 10 of 99 Page 11 of 99 Page 12 of 99 CONVENTION & SPORTS •Hosted 41 conventions & sporting events in 2020 •$4,253,816 in visitor spending •110 new events secured for 2021 and beyond •Estimated future visitor spending $28,221,611 millionPage 13 of 99 MEDIA •124 Tri-Cities travel related stories •2 Travel writers and bloggers hosted •270,324,560 positive media views OUTREACH Page 14 of 99 DIGITAL AND SOCIAL MEDIA Social Media MARKETING 25,839 6,200 9,839 155,205 Website visits 391,286 page viewsPage 15 of 99 •3,852,190 impressions •11,327 click throughs Campaigns were limited due to pandemic related travel restrictions within the state. Tourism campaigns that were deployed earned MARKETING CAMPAIGNS Page 16 of 99 COVID-19 MARKETING MESSAGES •24 Creatives •2,398 TV •1,773 radio spots •16.8 million impressions •36,000 click throughsPage 17 of 99 WORK PLAN FOR 2021Page 18 of 99 TPA funds available $1,109,379 Previously approved projects $591,111 Funds available for reinvestment:$518,268 TPA Reserves Available Page 19 of 99 TPA RESERVE ACCOUNT REQUESTS PROPOSED PROJECTS: DestinationNEXt Assessment and Strategic Planning $35,000 TBEX Hosting/Promotion $11,250 Grants for SkyNAV $50,000 Visiting Friends & Relatives Campaign $19,000 Billboard Advertising—Heart of Washington Wine Country $50,000 New Market Advertising –San Diego $40,000 Consumer Sentiment Study $50,000 Social Media Influencers $20,000 Music Licensing $70,000 Reserve Request Total $345,250 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR REINVESTMENT $518,268 Page 20 of 99 Page 21 of 99 ANNUALANNUALANNUALANNUALANNUALREPORTREPORTREPORTREPORTREPORT 2020 Page 22 of 99 Dear Tourism Partners, As we have all experienced, the coronavirus pandemic changed so many aspects of all our lives, challenging us personally and professionally. While no business segment was spared, the tourism industry has been adversely affected, and the impacts will be felt for years to come. But with great challenges come great opportunities, and Visit Tri-Cities embraced every opportunity presented during the past year. It is with great appreciation that we report to you the achievements we accomplished together in 2020. The following Annual Report showcases our stewardship of community trust and resources. 2020 began with hope and optimism, with a series of tourism focused campaigns planned. We started the year by inviting visitors to “Get Your Geek On” with a robust science-themed campaign in partnership with Battelle, our Official Champion of STEM Tourism. Unfortunately, just as we began promoting the STEM- related assets unique to the Tri-Cities, travel restrictions were put in place and the STEM campaign was cut short. Knowing that our local tourism-related businesses would need support, staff developed the ”Get Your Order On!” campaign, highlighting curbside service following the Stay Home, Stay Safe order. The video was complemented with a public service announcement featuring General James Mattis encouraging residents to support our local businesses, jobs, economy and quality of life by using curbside pickup, delivery and safe practices. We, like all of you, were hopeful that travel would return by early summer. However, it became obvious that travel to the Tri-Cities was not going to be allowable for some time. Knowing we needed to aggressively battle the pandemic, the team shifted their energies to support public health endeavors that would ultimately allow businesses to reopen and lead to the return of tourism. We partnered with Benton County, utilizing CARES ACT money to provide COVID-19 mitigation marketing communications to the Tri-Cities region. We collaborated with the Benton Franklin Health District to create campaigns in English and Spanish. Most effective was our use of humor to encourage social sharing and adoption of public health behaviors. We created a series of spots called CYA. As in, Cover Your Airholes. Additionally, the team continued to foster strong partnerships with the Tri-Cities Regional Chamber of Commerce and TRIDEC to create the Tri-Cities Open and Safe Coalition; provided leadership on the Municipality Advisory Council (MAC), which is comprised of representatives of nine local jurisdictions, Benton Franklin Health District, the Regional Chamber and TRIDEC; remade a popular 90s alternative rock song to promote good COVID practices and a produced a message to the Governor’s Office in support of reopening local businesses that follow local, state and federal health guidelines. These endeavors didn’t divert Visit Tri-Cities from its mission of driving visitor traffic to the community. While it’s true that it was difficult to promote travel during county-specific restrictions, the team developed campaigns to raise awareness of the destination with a key message: visitors are welcome when it is the appropriate time to travel. National Travel & Tourism Week was celebrated virtually, highlighting Tri-Cities amenities and over 150 area businesses. The team promoted the destination to meeting planners with a virtual familiarization tour of area hotels and meeting and convention spaces. Additionally, the staff offered leadership on the Washington Safe Meetings Coalition, which led to the return of safe meetings in an earlier Phase. The same support was provided for festivals and events. Finally, our Annual Report is not only a summary of our activities, but a reminder of the economic impact of the tourism industry for the Tri-Cities. The most recent numbers available are from 2019, a year when the Tri-Cities enjoyed $496.5 million in economic impact due to visitor spending. These dollars support a vibrant business community, attracting more amenities to the Tri-Cities. Sales tax revenue generated by tourism reduces each household’s tax burden in Benton and Franklin counties by an average of $737, supporting schools, teachers, emergency services, roads maintenance, parks and other services provided by our local municipalities. Moreover, 5,600 jobs were supported by tourism. The economic impacts of tourism in our community for 2020 are not yet available and will be a stark contrast to 2019 and the years before, but it is inspiring to see the positive impacts of tourism in the Tri-Cities. While 2020 was a difficult year, through community collaboration and tourism innovation we overcame many challenges, together. We’re looking forward to doing even more with our community partners in 2021. Michael Novakovich President & CEO To be an industry leader for destination marketing in the Pacific Northwest; the primary source of visitor information; and the lead advocate for visitor industry development in the Tri-Cities region. OUR VISION Rob Roxburgh 2021 Chairman of the Board WHY TOURISM MATTERS Page 23 of 99 Source: Tourism Economics 2019, An Oxford Economics Company 5,628 jobs in Benton & Franklin Counties CREATES HOTEL MOTEL TAX DISTRIBUTIONS Kennewick Pasco Richland Totals 2016 $539,578 $274,798 $475,641 $1,290,017 2017 $568,745 $323,445 $536,682 $1,428,872 2018 $592,249 $343,642 $598,997 $1,534,888 2019 $592,210 $324,891 $633,862 $1,550,963 2020 $277,886 $151,941 $270,733 $700,560 IMPERATIVE: ADVOCATE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL TOURISM INFRASTRUCTURE $108million 22% $82.3Recreation million 16% Retail million 26% million 20% $99 $79.8 million16% TransportationFood & Beverage Hotels $127.4 million$496.5 VISITOR SPENDING 4,418 Hotel Guest Rooms Available SPENDINGBREAKDOWN Sales tax revenued generated by tourism reduces each household’s annual tax burden in Benton and Franklin Counties by an average of $737 Visitor Spending represented in this report reflect the economic impact of tourism in the Tri-Cities for the year of 2019. The economic impacts of tourism in our community for 2020 are not yet available. WHY TOURISM MATTERS IMPERATIVE: DEMONSTRATE VALUE TO OUR PARTNERS, MEMBERS AND COMMUNITY Page 24 of 99 COUNTY 13.1% ADVERTISING 0.9% TPA 43.3% HOTEL 27.5 GRANTS & MISC 4% MEMBER 11.1% IMPERATIVE: DEMONSTRATE VALUE TO OUR STAKEHOLDERS, PARTNERS AND COMMUNITIES VISIT TRI-CITIES AT-A-GLANCE MARKETING AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT 2020 2019 Generating additional cash flow in to the region through visitor spending is important for the local economy. Visitor spending improves the business climate and offers opportunities for new endeavors to thrive. Visit Tri-Cities promotes the region as a premier destination for meetings, conventions, sports and leisure travel. Visit Tri-Cities’ Convention Marketing, Sports Marketing and Media Outreach departments all incorporate sales-driven strategies directed at markets with the greatest potential to bring new visitor dollars to the region. While marketing is important, product development is a priority as well. Through the Tri-Cities Rivershore Enhancement Council (TREC), Visit Tri-Cities works with local jurisdictions and hospitality partners to ensure that attractions are upgraded or added to the community in order to continue offering fresh experiences for visitors. 2019 Revenue Summary$2,684,038 TOTAL REVENUES 2020 Revenue Summary$2,547,498 TOTAL REVENUES The coronavirus pandemic had a significant impact on the tourism industry throughout the world, including the Tri- Cities. Travel restrictions coupled with uncertainly related to the COVID-19 virus, impacted Visit Tri-Cities’s revenue sources. Visit Tri-Cities worked to reduce expenses and seek additional revenue sources to support the organization’s mission to drive visitation when appropriate, including CARES ACT funding from Benton County and government grants. The following is a comparison of Visit Tri-Cities’ revenues for 2019 and 2020. TOURISM PROMOTION ASSESSMENT 58% HOTEL/MOTEL TAX 24.5% MISC 0.4% ADVERTISING 5.5% GRANTS/ MISC 4.1% MEMBER 11.6% MEMBER 11.1% TOURISM PROMOTION ASSESSMENT 43.3% HOTEL/MOTEL TAX 27.5% COUNTY/ CARES ACT 13.1% ADVERTISING 0.9% 2019 2020 MEMBER $312,289 $283,293 GRANTS/MISC $11,580 $102,246 ADVERTISING $147,534 $23,883 HOTEL $656,606 $700,560 TPA $1,556,028 $1,103,258 COUNTY $334,258 TOTAL $2,684,037 $2,547,498 Page 25 of 99 IMPERATIVE: ESTABLISH BRAND CLARITY AND INCREASE AWARENESS THROUGH UNIFIED EFFORTSTOURISMDEVELOPMENT AIRPORT/CONVENTION CENTER KIOSKS MEDIAOUTREACH ADVERTISING & MARKETING CONVENTIONS& SPORTS TRI-CITY REGIONALHOTEL-MOTELCOMMISSION Visit Tri-Cities manages tourism-related programs and infastructure within the community to position the Tri-Cities as a desirable ad compelling visitor destination. The Visit Tri-Cities’ website was emphasized as a community portal in all advertisements and visitor publications throughout the year. We activily encouraged all visitors to visit our website. The digital and social campaigns earned 16.8 million impressions leading to more than 36,000 click throughs to the Benton Franklin Health District website. 151 events scheduled to take place in 2020 were canceled due to COVID-19, representing 113,387 visitors and $32,371,689 in visitor spending. 17 events scheduled to take place in 2021 were canceled due to COVID-19, representing 3,992 visitors and $1,924,087 in visitor spending. WEBSITE HIGHLIGHTS 155,205 391,286 UNIQUE VISITS PAGE VIEWS UNIQUE VISITORS 2,061 PAGE VIEWS 7,447 The sales department’s primary focus is to market to convention, sports and group meeting planners through direct sales contacts, advertising in targeted periodicals and attending industry events. These activities mean “heads in beds” that generate hotel/motel tax revenues for our community. Twitter Followers 6,200 Facebook Followers 25,839 Instagram Followers 9,835 LinkedIn Followers 1,213 Stories 124 Positive Earned Media Views 270,324,560 Travel Writers Hosted 2 Kennewick Jerry Beach, SpringHill Suites by Marriott Mark Blotz, Clover Island Inn Pasco Monica Hammerberg, Hampton Inn & Suites Pasco/Tri-Cities Vijay Patel, A-1 Hospitality Richland Wendy Higgins, The Lodge at Columbia Point Andrew Lucero, Courtyard by Marriott Tri-Cities Rivershore Enhancement Council Tri-Cities Sports Council Tri-Cities Wine Tourism Council Tri-Cities National Park CommitteeDirectors of Sales VISIT TRI-CITIES COUNCILS MARKETING AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Visitors attracted 2020 PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS Number of conventions, sports & group activities $4,253,816 41 13,237 Convention and Sports visitor spending to region: 2021 & BEYOND Future visitor spending: Future visitors Future conventions,meetings and sports events. $28,221,611 110 77,04592Future conventions, meetings and sports events booked in 2020. BUSINESS BOOKED IN 2020 Of these 92 events booked, 38 events cancelled or rescheduled due to COVID-19. Future visitor spending: $15,358,458 Visit Tri-Cities focused on print, digital marketing, including commercials on streaming TV, with no broadcast media buys in 2020. Campaigns were limited due to pandemic related travel restrictions within the state. Tourism campaigns deployed in 2020 earned3,852,190 impressions & 11,327 click throughs Visit Tri-Cities develops and deploys a robust marketing plan annually, using a variety of effective tactics to raise brand awareness of the Tri-Cities. Visit Tri-Cities secured CARES ACT grant money from Benton County to develop and execute in-market advertising campaigns to encourage social distancing, use of face coverings and safety precautions to mitigate the effects of COVID-19, improve the health of our community and begin economic recovery. Creatives developed and deployed through digital, broadcast (TV & radio) and social 9/1-12/15/2020.24 Corporate Sponsor: Mission Support Alliance Television & 2,398 1,773 Radio Spots GRANTS/ MISC 4.1% HOTEL/MOTEL TAX 27.5% Ex-Officios: Marie Mosley, City of Kennewick Cindy Reents, City of Richland Dave Zabell, City of Pasco Corporate Sponsor: Washington River Protection Solutions Page 26 of 99 2020 A YEAR IN REVIEW JANUARY 13 Know Your Dam Facts Rally 21 Columbia River and Snake River Dams Meeting with U.S. Representative Dan Newhouse 23 Tourism Presentation to WSU-Tri-Cities Marketing Class 23 Columbia Basin College Hall of Fame Banquet 24 Visit Tri-Cities Staff Retreat 25 “Love Our Locals” – a program of Visit Tri-Cities & Tri-Cities Wine Tourism Council 29-31 Hosted TBEX (Travel Bloggers Exchange) Site Visit 30-31 Tri-Cities Legislative Trip to Olympia FEBRUARY 19 Leadership Presentation to Leadership Tri-Cities Class XXV 20 Presented on Tourism at Tri-Cities Economic Outlook Forum 20 Published the Official Tri-Cities Visitor Guide 20 Published Great Golf Getaways Brochure 22-23 Spokane Golf & Travel Show 24 New Board Member Orientation 26-27 Hosted Planning Visit for Association of Washington Cities (AWC) and included introductions with LIGO, B Reactor Museum Association and Port of Kennewick 27-28 Hosted representatives from Osborne Northwest Public Relations MARCH Presentation of the 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Work Plan to Pasco and Richland City Councils 1 Launched “Get Your Geek On” STEM campaign in partnership with Battelle 2 Snake River Dams Press Conference 4 Washington Wine Foundation 5 New Board Member Orientation 5 Visit Tri-Cities CEO/Board Member Collaboration Meeting 5 Published the 2019 Annual Report and Work Plan 6 New Council Member Meeting 8-10 Meeting Professionals International (MPI) Cascadia Conference, Bend, OR 12 Presented “Tourism in the Tri-Cities” to Kiwanis Club 13 Hospitality Meeting to discuss COVID-19 Challenges with Hotel and Meeting Venue Partners 17 Launched “Tri-Cities Open for Business” in partnership with TRIDEC and Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce 18-19 Conducted Olympia Sales Blitz Virtual Appointments with State & Regional Meeting Planners 19 Hosted a Virtual Meeting Planner Luncheon, “Making Vitality Your Reality” 25 PSA with General Mattis to Support Local Business 26 Launched “Come on Get Your Order On” Campaign 29-31 PPE Drive to collect critical health supplies in partnership with TRIDEC and Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce APRIL 10 Launched Sports Message from Visit Tri-Cities 10 WSU Tri-Cities Beverage Management Craft Beverage/Distilled Spirits Meeting 13 First Meeting to Bring Back Gatherings of 50+ Attendees 21 Presentation of the 2019 Annual Report and 2020 Work Plan to Kennewick City Councils 23 Launched STEM Travel Itineraries 24 TRIDEC’s Coffee with Karl – Rebuilding Tomorrow MAY 4 Launched of Excellence in Service Award Program 4-8 National Tourism Week 8 Launched VTC Staff Video, “Wipe It” 14 Hosted Tri-Cities Winemakers Virtual Panel 18 Launched segmented “When It Is Time Travel” tourism campaign, highlight wine country, family friendly activities and outdoor recreation. JUNE 1 Visit Tri-Cities Staff Strategic Planning Meeting 2 Initiate Tri-Cities Open & Safe Coalition with TRIDEC and Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce 3 Congressman Dan Newhouse Community Check-in Meeting 4 TRIDEC’s Coffee with Karl – Getting Ready for Phase 2 10 Unified Mask Media Event Visit Tri-Cities CEO/Board Member Collaboration Meeting 11-12 Washington Society of Association Executives (WSAE) Virtual Annual Conference 15-16 Tri-Cities Open & Safe PPE Donation Drive 16 Port of Benton Community Leader Focus Group for Strategic Plan 20 Launched Elected Officials PSA to encourage use of face coverings and social distancing 25-26 Tri-Cities Open & Safe Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) Distribution Drive 30 Meeting with Governor Jay Inslee and Press Conference Page 27 of 99 JULY Issued RFP for the design, execution and maintenance for a fully functional and interactive website 1 Road to Recovery Press Conference 3 Tri-Cities (Benton & Franklin Counties) advanced to Modified Phase 1 3 Tri-Cities Open & Safe Coalition launched the Business Pledge 9 Launched “Social Distance” music video featuring VTC Staff 14-15 Destinations International (DI) Virtual Annual Convention 17 TRIDEC’s Coffee with Karl – Tourism & Economic Diversification 20 Announcement that the Tri-Cities will host 2021 TBEX (Travel Bloggers Exchange) 20 DMA West Virtual Leadership Summit 21 Benton City Tour with Mayor Linda Lehman 22 Port of Kennewick Downtown Waterfront Master Plan Community Group Discussion 30 Washington Hospitality Association Southwest Washington Town Hall 30 DMA West Virtual Leadership Summit AUGUST Tri-Cities (Benton & Franklin Counties) advanced to an enhanced Modified Phase 1 3 Launched “We Are Tri-Citians” video 3 Awarded Benton County CARES Act Community Support Program Grant 3-21 Sports ETA SportsBIZ XChange Virtual Meetings 5 DMA West Virtual CEO Summit 10 Community Leaders Luncheon with Congressman Dan Newhouse 11 Association of Washington Business (AWB) Federal Affairs Summit 12 Diversity & Inclusion Panel hosted by Tracci Dial, KNDU 13 Tourism Presentation to Washington Economic Development Association (WEDA) 24 Awarded COVID Mitigation Agreement with Benton County 24 Launched In-Market Campaign with 24 creatives in English and Spanish running on TV, radio, social media and digital platforms 25-26 Virtual CVent CONNECT Conference SEPTEMBER 1 Battelle Announced as the Official of Champion of STEM Tourism 1 Selected Tempest to design and execute new Visit Tri-Cities website 9 Visit Tri-Cities CEO/Board Member Collaboration Meeting 16 Community Leaders Meeting with Congressman Dan Newhouse 18 Presented “Tourism in the Tri-Cities” to Kiwanis Club of Tri-Cities Industry 22 PNNL New Employee On-Boarding Presentation 23 Tri-Cities Hotel & Lodging Association 29 Washington Tourism Alliance (WTA) Brand Campaign Kick-off OCTOBER Tri-City Regional Hotel-Motel Commission 2021 Budget and Marketing Plan presented to Kennewick, Pasco and Richland City Councils 5-9 Washington Bike, Walk, and Roll Virtual Summit 7-10 Hosted SkyNav to film 3D/360 virtual reality video experiences 8 Washington State Tourism Conference 13 Tri-Cities Advanced to Phase 2 14 Launched tourism-focused TV Ad and Social Media Campaigns 14 Western States Virtual Expo with Washington Tourism Alliance (WTA) 14 Congressman Dan Newhouse and Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Tour of Rattlesnake Mountain 19-22 Virtual TEAMS Conference & Expo 22 Washington Tourism Marketing Authority (WTMA) Annual Board of Directors Meeting NOVEMBER Interlocal Agreement signed by the Cities of Kennewick, Pasco and Richland for the increase of the TPA Assessment 6 DMA West Annual Business Meeting 10 Visit Tri-Cities Annual Meeting – 2020 in the Rearview Mirror 13 Launched Tri-Cities Region Wine Trail Pass in partnership with Bandwango 17-19 National Tour Association (NTA) Virtual Tour Exchange 19 Visit Tri-Cities Virtual FAM Tour for Meeting Professionals 19 Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR) Treaty Rights Meeting 20 Hospitals and Public Health Press Conference DECEMBER Five-year Agreement for the Promotion of Tourism with the Cities of Kennewick, Pasco and Richland and Visit Tri-Cities signed 7 Benton-Franklin River Heritage Foundation Annual Meeting 7 Launched Tri-Cities Elected Officials Message to Governor and Community to Safely Lift Restrictions and Re-Open Businesses 8 WSU Tri-Cities Marketing Student Tourism Research Project Presentations 8 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) Meeting 15-16 Destination International (DI) CEO Summit 17 Hosted IRONMAN Feasibility Meeting with Jurisdictions/Stakeholders Page 28 of 99 Visit Tri-Cities is the only organization dedicated to promoting the entire Tri-Cities area for leisure and group travel. Visit Tri-Cities offers a U.S. toll-free number for visitor inquiries and responds to requests for relocation, vacations, meetings, sports and community information. Visitor Center staff provide travel information, manage a community-wide events calendar and website, provide information through the Visitor Center, and maintain an informational kiosk at the Tri-Cities Airport and two satellite Visitor Centers. Rivershore, Heritage & Eco-Tourism The Tri-Cities Rivershore Enhancement Council (TREC) is made up of executive leaders from the cities of Kennewick, Pasco, Richland and West Richland; Benton and Franklin Counties; the ports of Benton, Kennewick and Pasco; and Visit Tri-Cities; and is sponsored by Bechtel National, Inc. TREC is focused on priortization of the tasks outlined in the Rivershore Master Plan II. The Rivershore Master Plan III outlines overarching themes for improving the Sacagawea Heritage Trail and shoreline areas including: wayfinding signage; art, culture and heritage; viewpoints and user amenities; water oriented activities; birding and wildlife viewing; inland linkages; and organized events. Each of the participating jurisdictions also worked on individual projects along the shoreline and adjacent parks that will add to the overall positive experience of visitors to the region. Telephone Email & Direct Mail PUBLICATIONS: VISITOR GUIDE GREAT GOLF GETAWAYS HERITAGE AND ECO- TOURISM CORPORATE SPONSOR: BATTELLE RIVERSHORE ENHANCEMENT CORPORATE SPONSOR: BECHTEL NATIONAL INC. In-person Visitors 2020 VISITOR INQUIRIES 2,469 651 Now the Official Champion of STEM Tourism Page 29 of 99 Deborah Barnard, Barnard Griffin Winery Commissioner Don Barnes, Port of Kennewick Jerry Beach, SpringHill Suites by Marriott Commissioner Jim Beaver, Benton County Troy Berglund, West Richland Chamber of Commerce Karen Blasdel, Battelle Mark Blotz, Clover Island Inn Washington State Representative Matt Boehnke Gloria Boyce, Ben Franklin Transit Washington State Senator Sharon Brown Council Member Rich Buel, City of West Richland Jennifer Cunnington, STCU Karl Dye, TRIDEC Colleen French, Department of Energy Shae Frichette, Frichette Winery Monica Hammerberg, Hampton Inn & Suites Pasco/Tri-Cities Colin Hastings, Pasco Chamber of Commerce Sandra Haynes, WSU Tri-Cities Wendy Higgins, The Lodge at Columbia Point Diahann Howard, Port of Benton Commissioner Robert Koch, Franklin County Council Member Phillip Lemley, City of Richland Andrew Lucero, Courtyard by Marriott Richland Brian Paul Lubanski, KAPP/KVEW TV Lori Mattson, Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce Brent Miles, Tri-City Dust Devils Maynard Plahuta, B Reactor Museum Association Dara Quinn, Emerald of Siam Justin Raffa, Mid-Columbia Mastersingers Cliff Reynolds, Red Lion Hotel & Conference Center Pasco Council Member Zahra Roach, City of Pasco Rosanna Sharpe, The REACH Museum Steve Simmons, CG Public House & Catering Council Member Chuck Torelli, City of Kennewick Nikki Torres, Tri-Cities Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Rebekah Woods, Columbia Basin College Founded: 1969 as a non-profit organization Staff: 10 full-time employees Structure: Governed by a 42-member Board of Directors Members: 643 Websites: www.VisitTriCities.com www.VisitTri-Cities.com www.VisitTri-Cities.org www.VisitTri-Cities.travel www.TravelTri-Cities.com www.TravelTriCities.com www.GolfWineCountry.com www.FriendsofOurTrail.com Michael Novakovich, President & CEO Kim Shugart, Senior Vice President Hector Cruz, Vice President Gretchen Guerrero, Director of Operations Lara Watkins, Director of Convention Sales Karisa Saywers, Director of Marketing Maria Alleman, Convention Sales Manager Chase Wharton, Business Development Manager Justin Hawkes, Marketing Manager Linda Tedone, Sales Administrative Assistant Rob Roxburgh, Washington River Protection Solutions Kathy Moore, The Hotel Group Corey Pearson, Three Rivers Campus Vijay Patel, A-1 Hospitality (Hotel & Lodging Representative) Buck Taft, Tri-Cities Airport/Port of Pasco Staci West, Bechtel National, Inc. Ron Hue John Raschko, Miller Mertens & Comfort, P.L.L.C. Monte Nail 2020 BOARD OF DIRECTORSOVERVIEW VISIT TRI-CITIES STAFF 2020 VISIT TRI-CITIES LEADERSHIP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CHAIR PAST CHAIR FIRST VICE CHAIR VICE CHAIR VICE CHAIR VICE CHAIR TREASURER LEGAL COUNSEL CPA Page 30 of 99 Economic Development Partners City of Kennewick City of Pasco City of Richland Tri-City Regional Hotel Commission Diamond Members ($10,000+) Three Rivers Campus Bechtel National, Inc. Mission Support Alliance, LLC Battelle Washington River Protection Solutions Lamb Weston Platinum Members ($5,000–$9,999) Ben Franklin Transit Benton County Benton PUD City of West Richland Franklin PUD The HAPO Center Jacobs Port of Benton Port of Kennewick Port of Pasco Gold Members ($1,000–$4,999) Amentum Atkins Banner Bank Benton-Franklion Council of Gov Best Western Plus Columbia River Hotel & Conference Center Best Western Premier Pasco Inn & Suites Clover Island Inn Courtyard by Marriott Richland Columbia Point Energy Northwest Fluor Federal Services GESA credit union HAPO credit union Hilton Garden Inn Tri-Cities/Kennewick Holiday Inn Express & Suites Pasco Tri-Cities Holiday Inn Richland on the River Lourdes Health Network Numerica Credit Union Quality Inn Red Lion Columbia Center Red Lion Hotel Pasco Airport & Conference Center Riverfront Hotel, SureStay Collection by Best Western SpringHill Suites by Marriott Kennewick Tri-Cities Tri-Cities Community Health Trios Health Community Members ($185–$999) 14 Hands Winery 3 Eyed Fish Wine Bar 3 Rivers Folklife A&A Motorcoach AAA Washington Abadan Academy of Children’s Theatre Ace Jewelry & Loan Antiques & Collectibles Adventures Underground Amentum Affinity at Southridge Aflac - Dennis Sams AHBL MEMBERSHIP Visit Tri-Cities member investors create the foundation for our programs through their financial support. In turn, Visit Tri-Cities is equally committed to promoting our members throughquality publications, tourism marketing and advertising opportunities, referrals, educational forums and newsletters. In 2020, Visit Tri-Cities’ membership total reached 643. AIA Magnum Promotions Airfield Estates Winery AJ’s Edible Arts Alaska Airlines Alexandria Nicole Cellars Alexandria Nicole Cellars Destiny Ridge Tasting Room Allen Brecke Law Offices Allied Arts Association - Gallery at the Park Amazon.com Amber Rose Consignment Boutique American Association of University Women (AAUW) Anelare Winery Anneliese M. Johnson, CRPC, Financial Advisor ANS (Alternative Nursing Services) Anthology Event Center by Castle Catering Anthony’s at Columbia Point Arlene’s Flowers & Gifts Art on the Columbia Art Without Borders Artmil Arts Center Task Force As You Wish Houses Aspen Limo Tours At Michele’s Atomic Ale Brewpub & Eatery Atomic Bowl/Joker’s Lounge & Casino Atomic Escape Rooms Atomic Screenprinting, Signs & Embroidery AutoZone AXE KPR Hatchet Range Azteca B & B Express Printing B Reactor Museum Association Badger Mountain Vineyards Baker & Giles Baker Boyer D.S. Baker Advisors Bank of the West Banner Bank Corp. & RE Loan Center Barnard Griffin, Inc. Baum’s Baymont Inn & Suites Bekins Northwest Bella Italia Bella Vista Apartments Bennett Rentals Benton City Chamber of Commerce Benton County Fairgrounds Benton Franklin Fair & Rodeo Benton Rural Electric Association Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Bergstrom Aircraft, Inc. Berkshire Hathaway Home Services Tri Cities Real Estate Best Western Convention Center Hotel Kennewick Best Western Kennewick Inn Better Business Bureau Northwest Big Bend Electric Cooperative, Inc. Big River IT Bike Tri-Cities Bill’s Berry Farm Bingo Boulevard BITE at the Landing Black Heron Spirits, LLC Bleyhl Co-op Blue Dolphin Car Wash & Steptoe Mini Storage Bob’s Burgers and Brew - Kennewick Location Bob’s Burgers and Brew - Richland Location Boiada Brazilian Grill Bombing Range Brewing Company Boys & Girls Club of Benton and Franklin Counties Brews Taphouse & Growler Fills Brick House Pizza Broadmoor RV SuperStore Brutzman’s Office Solutions Bud Knore Insurance Budd’s Broiler Buds & Blossoms Too Burger Ranch Burger Ranch - Pasco Camerata Musica Campbell & Company Canyon Lakes Golf Course Caribbean Golf Cascade Natural Gas Corp Catering To You Cedars at Pier 1 CG Public House & Catering (was Country Gentleman) Chandler Reach Winery Chapala Express Chaplaincy Health Care Chaplaincy Repeat Boutique Cherry Chalet Bed & Breakfast Chervenell Construction Company Chuck E Cheese Chukar Cherries Cigar Savvy Shop, LLC City of Kennewick City of Pasco City of Richland Clearwater Square Apartment Houses Cliff Thorn Construction, LLC CliftonLarsenAllen LLP CloudSigns. TV Clover Island Marina Col Solare Winery Coldwell Banker Tomlinson Associated Brokers Columbia Bank, Pasco Columbia Basin BMX Columbia Basin College Columbia Basin Paper Supply Columbia Basin Racquet Club Columbia Basin Veterans Center Columbia Center Columbia Center Heights Exec. Suites Columbia Crest Winery Columbia Industries Columbia Park Golf Tri-Plex Columbia Point Golf Course Columbia Sun RV Resort Comfort Inn Comfort Suites Kennewick At Southridge Communities in Schools of Benton-Franklin Community Concerts of Tri-Cities Community First Bank Community Real Estate Group Connell Heritage Museum Conover Insurance - Felicia Green Conover Insurance - Tawni Gama Corwin Ford Cougar Cave Expresso Country Mercantile Country Mercantile - Richland Courtyard by Marriott Pasco Tri-Cities Airport Cowan Estates Coyote Bob’s Roadhouse Casino Coyote Canyon Mammoth Site Coyote Canyon Winery Craig J. Griffiths Crazy Moose Casino Cyber Art 509 Dallas Green Team D-Bat Columbia Basin Dennis Sams, AFLAC DermaCare Desert Food Mart Desert Wind Winery Devoted Builders LLC Digital Image Tri-Cities Inc. Quality Printing Distinctive Properties, Inc. Downtown Pasco Development Authority DownUnderSportFishing DrewBoy Creative E Benton Co. Historical Society Museum Eastern Washington Transportation Econo Lodge Edith Bishel Center for the Blind and Visually Imparired Einan’s at Sunset Emerald of Siam Thai Restaurant and Lounge Entertainment Warehouse Eritage Resort Europa Events at Sunset EverStar Realty EVM Productions Experience 46 Degrees Fairfield Inn by Marriott Farmers National Company, Flo Sayre Farmhand Winery Fast and Curryous FastSigns Fat Olives Restaurant & Catering Fidelitas Wine Fieldstone Grandridge First American Title Five Guys Burgers & Fries - Richland WA Focal Point Marketing & Multimedia Ford Audio Services Fort Walla Walla Museum Franklin County Franklin County Historical Society & Museum Franklin County RV Park FreshPicks WA Smoothies Frichette Winery Friends of Badger Mountain Friends of Sacajawea State Park Frontier Title & Escrow Company Frost Me Sweet Bakery & Bistro Fujiyama Japenese Steak House and Bar Fuse SPC G & S Properties Garden Hop Pot Garrett Electric Company, Inc. Gesa Carousel of Dreams Going Fishing Guide Service Goodwill Industries of the Columbia Goose Ridge Estate Winery Gordon Estate Winery Grandridge Eye Clinic GRAZE - ‘a place to eat’ Great Harvest Bread Company Greenies Growing Forward Services HALO Branded Solutions Hamilton Cellars Page 31 of 99 Hampton Inn & Suites Pasco/Tri-Cities Hampton Inn Kennewick at Southridge Hampton Inn Richland HAPO Community Credit Union Harvey Insurance Agency Havana Café Heaston Thompson Vision Clinic Hedges Family Estate Hermiston Chamber of Commerce & Confer- ence Center Hightower Cellars Historic Downtown Kennewick Partnership Historic Downtown Prosser Association Holiday Inn Express Hermiston Downtown Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites Richland Home 2 Suites by Hilton Home Builders Association of Tri-Cities Homes & Land Magazine Homewood Suites by Hilton - Richland HoneyBaked Ham Café Hops n Drops - Kennewick Location Hops n Drops - Richland Location Horn Rapids Golf Course Horn Rapids RV Resort & Mini Mart Hot Tamales, LLC Huck Finn Kennels Ice Harbor Brewing Co. Ice Harbor Brewing Co. at the Marina IHOP Restaurants Image Fashions Indian Eyes, LLC Infinity Homes of WA Inline Computer & Communications Innovative Mortgage Inter-Mountain Alpine Club International Bigfoot Conference iplay Experience It’s All in the Details J. Bookwalter Jim Custer Enterprises, Inc. Joe & Lety Torres John Clement Photography JPI Insurance Solutions JRN Consulting, LLC Kadlec Regional Medical Center KAPP- KVEW Television Kayla Pratt, Realtor Keller Williams Realty Keller Williams Realty Kelley’s Tele-Communications Kennewick Irrigation District Kennewick School District Kennewick Suites KEPR (CBS)/KUNW/CW9 Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC Kickstand Tours Kiona Vineyards and Winery Kiska Farms Inc. Kitzke Cellars Kiwanis Club of Horse Heaven Hills KNDU-TV Kris Watkins (Lifetime Honorary Member) La Quinta Inn and Suites La Serena at Hansen Park Lakeside Gem & Mineral Club Lampson International LCD Exposition Services Lemon Grass Liberty Christian School LIGO - Hanford Observatory Longship Cellars Lori Middleton - Realtor Keller Williams Lower Columbia Basin Audubon Society Lu Lu’s Craft Bar + Kitchen Lucky Flowers MacKay Sposito Magills Restaurant & Catering Magnolia Music Studio Margaret Merrifield, MD, CCFP Markel Properties Market Vineyards Martinez & Martinez Winery Maryhill Winery & Amphitheater Masala Indian Cuisine McCurley Business Elite McDonald’s Restaurant McKinley Springs MEIER Architecture * Engineering Melendy Entertainment Services Mercer Wine Estates Merrill Lynch Mezzo Thai Fusion Mid-Columbia Ballet Mid-Columbia Libraries Mid-Columbia Mastersingers Mid-Columbia Musical Theatre Mid-Columbia Symphony Middleton Six Sons Farms Milbrandt Vineyards Miller, Mertens & Comfort, PLLC Minuteman Press of Kennewick Miss Tamale Monarcha Winery Monte Nail, CPA P.S. Monterosso’s Italian Restaurant Moon Security Services, Inc. Moonshot Brewing Mooreshots Direct, Inc. Motel 6 Kennewick Motoring Services Auto Repair My Garden Overfloweth My Place Hotel NARFE Employees Association NCMI Corporation Northwest Golfmaps Northwest Paddleboarding Northwet United Protestant Church Nouveau Skin Care & Day Spa Nuclear Care Partners NV5 Octopus Garden OJEDA Pacific Shore Powersports Pahlisch Homes Paragon Corporate Housing Parkview Estates Pasco Aviation Museum Pasco Chamber of Commerce Pasco Golfland Pasco Specialty Kitchen Pay Plus Benefits, Inc. PayneWest Insurance Peak Mortgage Peak Mortgage Pepsi Cola Bottling Co Picture Yourself Piton Wealth PIXELSOFT FILMS Plateau Press, Printing • Branding • Design Polka Dot Pottery Power Up Arcade Bar Preszler’s Guide Service, LLC Pro Made Homes PROOF Gastropub Prosser Chamber of Commerce Prosser Economic Development Association Prosser Wine Network PS Media, Inc. Purple Star Wines Quality Inn - Kennewick Ranch & Home Rattlesnake Mountain Harley-Davidson RE/MAX Professionals REACH Museum Real Property Management Tri Cities Red Dot Paintball Red Lion Inn & Suites Kennewick Tri-Cities Red Lion Templin’s Hotel on the River Red Lobster Red Mountain AVA Alliance Red Mountain Photo Bus, LLC Red Mountain Trails Red Mountain Trails Winery Restaurante El Chapala Retter & Company, Sotheby’s International Realty Richland Players Theater Richland Public Library Richland School District Richland Senior Association RideNow Powersports Tri-Cities Roads2 Travel Company Rollarena Skating Center Rolling Hills Chorus Ron Hue Roxy Theater Antiques & Gifts RRoyal Rides Runners of the Sage Safeguard Printing & Promotional Products Sage Brewing Company Sageland Center Sandollar Farms & Alpacas Sandy’s Fabrics & Machines Sandy’s Trophies, Inc. Seattle Children’s Tri-Cities Clinic Seoul Fusion Korean Restaurant Shari’s Restaurant Sheep’s Clothing Shelby’s Floral & Gifts Simplified Celebrations Skippers Seafood n’ Chowder Sleep Inn Tri-Cities Sleeping Dog Wines Smooth Moves, LLC Snake River Adventures Soap Lake Natural Spa & Resort Solar Spirits Spare Time Lanes Speedy Movers Spencer Carlson Furniture & Design Sporthaus Northwest, Inc. Statewide Publishing STCU Stevenson Advertising Stonecrest Builders Sugar It Sun Willows Golf Course Sundance Aviation SunWest Sportwear Super 8 Kennewick SuperMex El Pueblo Market Swadee Thai Cuisine Swampy’s BBQ Sauce & Catering Tagaris Winery Tamastslikt Cultural Institute Tapteal Greenway Tapteil Vineyard Winery TC Black Teknologize Terra Blanca Winery & Estate Vineyard The Arc of Tri-Cities The Bradley The Children’s Reading Foundation The Crazy Crab Place The Edge Steakhouse & Sports Lounge The Educated Cigar, LLC The Endive Eatery The Garden Tri Cities The Grain Bin Inn The Hotel Group The L&W Team The Lodge at Columbia Point The Olive Garden The Pita Pit The Pub The Rude Mechanicals The Tip Pit The Uptown Business Improvement District Three Rivers Lacrosse Club Thurston Wolfe Winery Titan Homes, LLC Towne Place Suites by Marriott Toyota of Tri-Cities Traveler Mobile Espresso Treveri Cellars Tri City Furnished Home Rentals TRI•CU Credit Union Tri-Cities Alliance FC Tri-Cities Area Journal of Business Tri-Cities Auto Licensing Tri-Cities Battery, Inc. Tri-Cities Cancer Center Tri-Cities Figure Skating Club Tri-Cities Girls Fastpitch Softball Association Tri-Cities Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Tri-Cities Life Tri-Cities Newcomers Club Tri-Cities Prep, A Catholic High School Tri-Cities Sunrise Rotary / See3Slam Tri-Cities Tournament Committee Tri-Cities Wine Society Tri-City Americans Tri-City Association of Realtors Tri-City Dust Devils Tri-City Herald Tri-City Kart Club Tri-City Quilters’ Guild Tri-City Rage Semi-Pro Football Team Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce Tri-City Tappers Tri-City Water Follies Association TRIDEC Tri-Fun Tucannon Cellars Tumbleweeds Mexican Flair Twigs Bistro & Martini Bar U.S. Bank Tri-Cities Business Center U.S. Linen & Uniform United Way of Benton & Franklin Counties Uptown Antique Market US Army Corp of Engineers Vanguard Cleaning Systems Viking Homes Vintners Lodge Visit Lewis Clark Valley Walker Heye Meehan & Eisinger, PLLC Wallowa County Chamber of Commerce Washington Hospitality Association Washington State Railroads Historical Society Washington State University Tri-Cities Washington Trust Bank Water2Wine Cruises Wautoma Springs West Richland Area Chamber of Commerce West Richland Golf Course Wet Palette Uncork & Create Studio Wheelhouse Community Bike Shop White Bluff’s Brewing White Bluffs Quilt Museum Wildhorse Resort & Casino Windermere Group ONE Wine Valley Golf Club Wine Yakima Valley WingStop - Pasco Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities WoodSpring Suites WorkSource Columbia Basin Wright’s Desert Gold Yakama Nation Legends Casino & Legends Casino Hotel Yakima Federal Savings Ye Merrie Greenwood Players YMCA of the Greater Tri-Cities Z Place Salon & Spa Zintel Creek Golf Club Page 32 of 99 2020 CHAIRMAN’S CIRCLE MEMBERS GOLD MEMBERS Amentum Atkins Banner Bank Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Best Western Plus Columbia River Hotel and Conference Center Best Western Premier Pasco Inn & Suites Clover Island Inn Courtyard by Marriott Richland Columbia Point Energy Northwest Fluor Federal Services Gesa Credit Union HAPO Community Credit Union Hilton Garden Inn Tri-Cities/ Kennewick Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites Pasco-TriCities Holiday Inn Richland On The River Lourdes Health Network Numerica Credit Union Quality Inn Kennewick Red Lion Hotel Columbia Center Red Lion Hotel Pasco Airport & Conference Center Riverfront Hotel, SureStay Collection by Best Western SpringHill Suites by Marriott Kennewick Tri-Cities Tri-Cities Community Health Trios Health We acknowledge with pride and appreciation the support of our Chairman’s Circle members. It is their extra commitment to Visit Tri-Cities that helps us distribute our message about the Tri-Cities and welcome guests to our area. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS City of Kennewick City of Pasco City of Richland Tri-City Regional Hotel-Motel Commission DIAMOND Battelle Bechtel National, Inc. Mission Support Alliance Three Rivers Convention Center Toyota Arena Toyota Center Washington River Protection Solutions Lamb Weston PLATINUM MEMBERS Ben Franklin Transit Benton County Benton PUD City of West Richland Franklin PUD The HAPO Center Jacobs Port of Benton Port of Kennewick Port of Pasco 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd., Ste. B Kennewick, WA 99336 (509) 735-8486 I (800) 254-5824 www.VisitTri-Cities.com Page 33 of 99 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 17, 2021 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 3/22/21 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Transportation Planning Efforts I. REFERENCE(S): PowerPoint Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: None. III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Transportation is a vital resource for all communities. With over 385 miles of roadway and streets and over 400 miles of sidewalks, trails, or pathways in the City Limits, this infrastructure is an asset and necessity for fellow community members seeking to travel within Pasco. The design of Pasco's transportation system has a direct impact on everyone's ability to travel to work, our homes, parks, schools, medical appointments, or daily activities. It should also be mentioned, that the layout of Pasco's streets also has an impact on the emergency and first responders, who are tasked with navigating in Pasco on a 24/7 basis. The Pasco City Council (Council) has included transportation as a part of prior and current Council Goals, a significant part of the City's budgeting process, and is also the focus of major planning studies and plans. In Resolution No. 3985 (September 21, 2020), the Council established a set of primary goals for the years 2020-2021. The following transportation-related items are identified in the Resolution: Page 34 of 99 • Quality of Life o Ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and effectiveness of public resources in the delivery of municipal services, programs, and long-term maintenance and viability of public facilities o Updating design standards for the development of new neighborhoods and re-development to promote greater e.g.: design elements, cohesion neighborhood through walkability, aesthetics, sustainability, and community gathering spaces • Fiscal Sustainability o urbanization the of to the policies Updating relating unincorporated islands to assure consistency with long -range planning, community safety, and fiscal sustainability • Economic Vitality o The Completion of the Comprehensive Plan Update, Broadmoor Master Plan, adoption of Urban Growth Area expansion longadopted implementation alternative, of -range planning efforts with appropriate analysis and adoption of planning actions including zoning code changes, phased sign code update and development regulations and standards Transportation was the focus of an entire Council Goal, as provided below: • Community Transportation Network o Continued emphasis on improvements on the Road 68 / I-182 / Burden Blvd corridor to improve operation and safety o Data-driven, pro-active neighborhood traffic calming efforts o Continued collaboration with Ben Franklin Transit to enhance mobility and access o Master and Plan System of a Completion Transportation utilization of its recommendations to develop policies, regulations, programs, connectivity, greater for and that projects provide strategic investment, mobility, multi-modal systems, accessibility, efficiency, and safety Prior to the 2020-2021 Council Goals, transportation and mobility were also emphasized dating back to the Council Goals for 2010-2011 (Resolution No. 3233) indicating a need to address the increasing congestion at Road 68 and Interstate I-182 interchange. Resolution No. 3848 (Council Goals 2018 -2019) included and inclusive comprehensive transportation develop to efforts a planning and analysis process that would emphasize the facilitation of traffic flow in major corridors and support the integration of pedestrian, bicycle, and non-vehicle travel. Page 35 of 99 In total, transportation-related efforts and/or tasks to identify solutions were in each set of Council Goals from 2010 through 2020. Other policies adopted by Council have included the Complete Streets Policy of 2018 (Ordinance No. 4389) that was a follow-up action to Resolution No. 3725 passed by the Council in September 2016. This resolution required that all street projects shall include Complete Streets elements in order to create an interconnected, integrated network of inclusive facilities. Also in 2018, Council adopted the Pasco's first policy on Greenhouse Gas Emission identified This 3853. policy Resolution through Reductions No measures to address emission reductions including the following policies: • Policy G1: Encourage development patterns that utilize the existing infrastructure; reduce the need for new roads, utilizes and other public works in new growth areas; and enhance non-automobile transportation • Policy J2: Provide safe and convenient access for pedestrians and bicyclists, across, and along major transit priority streets focus 2018the on heavy was transportation recently, Most a -2038 Comprehensive Plan adopted by Council through Resolution No 3998. The Washington State Growth Management Act ("GMA") requires each jurisdiction planning under the GMA to develop a Transportation Element that encourages efficient multi-modal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with County and City Comprehensive Plans per RCW 36.70A.020. The following are from the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan: • Transportation Goal 1: Provide for and maintain a safe, integrated, and effective transportation system that promotes connectivity • Transportation Goal 2: Encourage efficient, alternate, and multi -modal transportation systems • Transportation Goal 3: Improve operating efficiency of the transportation system The actions by the Council and the development of policies confirm that transportation is a major focus of the City. This was moved forward with the approval for the development of the Pasco Transportation System Master Plan ("TSMP"). This is the first plan by the City that focuses solely on transportation in our community. Through the early stages of the TSMP, there were numerous inconsistencies identified within our development regulations and standards that did not align with Council Policy or adopted plans. The purpose of this report is to provide the Council with an update on the Transportation System Master Plan and related transportation -related efforts. A presentation has been prepared and will be provided by DKS Associates and Page 36 of 99 City staff. V. DISCUSSION: Presentation. Page 37 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts March 22, 2021Page 38 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts 1.Summary of Council Goals 2.Transportation System Masterplan Update, DKS Associates 3.Ongoing Planning Efforts 4.Q&APage 39 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts 2020-2021 Council Goals (Resolution No 3985) Community Transportation Network •Continued emphasis on improvements on the Road 68 / I-182 / Burden Blvd corridor to improve operation and safety; •Data-driven, pro-active neighborhood traffic calming efforts; •Continued collaboration with Ben Franklin Transit to enhance mobility and access; •Completion of a Transportation System Master Plan and utilization of its recommendations to develop policies, regulations, programs, and projects that provide for greater connectivity, strategic investment, mobility, multi-modal systems, accessibility, efficiency, and safetyPage 40 of 99 OVERVIEW AND WORK COMPLETED TO DATE MARCH 2021 CARL SPRINGER PROJECT MANAGER carl.springer@dksassociates.com 503-753-8991 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN Page 41 of 99 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN SOURCE: DKS ASSOCIATES PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • MARCH 22, 2021 5 The Pasco Transportation System Master Plan (TSMP) is a guide for future transportation investments to ensure that they align with the community’s goals, values, and vision for the future.Page 42 of 99 PROJECT SCHEDULE ITEMS COMPLETED: ●GOALS & POLICIES REVIEW ●PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN ●EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS ●ONLINE OPEN HOUSE #1 ●FUTURE CONDITIONS ONGOING WORK: ●SOLUTIONS ●IMPLEMENTATION ●TIF UPDATE ON-TRACK FOR ADOPTION IN LATE SPRING 2021 SOURCE: DKS ASSOCIATES PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • MARCH 22, 2021 6Page 43 of 99 OVERVIEW OF SYSTEM ISSUESPage 44 of 99 PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • MARCH 22, 2021 8 SOURCE: DKS ASSOCIATES SAFETY ISSUES •Burden •Sylvester •Court •Lewis CONGESTION •Road 68 /Burden •US 395/near Sylvester and LewisPage 45 of 99 STREET SYSTEM CONNECTIVITY CONSTRAINTS 1.DOWNTOWN AREA IS WELL CONNECTED 2.AREA SOUTH OF I-182 AND WEST OF US 395 IS MIXED QUALITY. 3.NORTH OF I-182 HAS LONG BLOCKS AND LIMITED ACCESS, DISJOINTED MULTIMODAL CONNECTIVITY. SOURCE: DKS ASSOCIATES PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • MARCH 22, 2021 9 1 2 3 Page 46 of 99 CONNECTIVITY & SPACING STANDARDS •DISTANCE BETWEEN CROSS- STREETS •ACCESS SPACING BY FUNCTIONAL CLASS 10Page 47 of 99 OVERVIEW OF SOLUTIONS 11Page 48 of 99 PRIORITY BICYCLE NETWORK PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN TAC MEETING #3 • DECEMBER 4, 2020 12Page 49 of 99 BIKE FACILITY OPTIONS PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • MARCH 22, 2021 13 SOURCE: STREETMIX TIER 1: SEPARATED TIER 2: SHAREDPage 50 of 99 ROAD RECONFIGURATIONS PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING • MARCH 22, 2021 14 20th Avenue Court Street Sylvester StreetPage 51 of 99 LANE REDUCTIONS VERSUS PRIOR PLANS PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • MARCH 22, 2021 15 Road 100 Road 100 Burns Road Page 52 of 99 CHALLENGES AT ROAD 100 & ROAD 68 INTERCHANGES WITH I-182 PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • MARCH 22, 2021 16 Road 100/ Sandifur Parkway Intersection Road 100/ I-182 Interchange Road 68/ I-182 InterchangePage 53 of 99 CHALLENGES ON US 12 PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN • MARCH 22, 2021 17 US 12/ A Street Intersection US 12/Tank Farm Intersection Potential Future Interchange Page 54 of 99 IMPLEMENTATION & FUNDING 18Page 55 of 99 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE UPDATE PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING • MARCH 22, 2021 •Major Street Improvement Projects to be Added •Cost Share Associated with Growth Applies to TIF •Proposed new fees will be compared to similar communitiesPage 56 of 99 OTHER IMPLEMENTATION STEPS PASCO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING • MARCH 22, 2021 •IMPROVE SAFETY AND ACCESSIBILITY >Update to complete street standards >Add street functional class for neighborhood collectors >Revise access spacing standards based on street classification >Retrofit streets to better balances walking and biking optionsPage 57 of 99 QUESTIONS? CARL SPRINGER PROJECT MANAGER carl.springer@dksassociates.com 503-753-8991Page 58 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts Street Connectivity (Code Amendment 2019-013) •TSMP identified barriers to access and mobility early in the plan •Planning Commission introduced to item in December 2019 Objective: Ensure consistency and alignment of established City Council Goals and development regulations Proposal •Considerations for non-motorized access •Reduction of block lengths and block perimeters •Added clarity for mobility standardsPage 59 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts Street Connectivity (Code Amendment 2019-013) Key Themes •Access •Collaboration •Connectivity •Efficiency •Mobility •Multi-modal •Safety Benefits •Addressing Community Input •Implementation of Recommendations & Best Practices •Compliance & Consistency Impacts •Increased Regulations •CostsPage 60 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts Street Connectivity (Code Amendment 2019-013) Why Now? •Council Goals •Transportation included in each Council Goal Resolution since 2010 •2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan (Resolution No 3998) •Implementation of Established Policies •2018 Complete Streets Policy (Ordinance No 4389) •2018 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Police (Resolution No 3853) •2011 Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan (Resolution No 3021)Page 61 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts How do we compare?Measuring Pasco with the 20 largest cities in Washington 75,43 Population #16 47% Housing + Transportation (PCT of Income) #10 Sources: Center for Neighborhood Technology; Census American Community Survey (2018 5-yr Estimates); Census LODES/LEHD 24% Transportation (PCT of Income) #3 22,776 Annual VMT/Household #2 $3,718 Annual VMT Cost / Household #2 9.96 Annual GHG / Household #2Page 62 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts 55% 11% 22% 12% 0% % Students in Walkable Neighborhoods 0-24 25-49 50-69 70-89 90-100 •55% of students in the Pasco School District have WalkScore below 25 •66% of students have a Walkscore below 50 Source: Walkscore.com & Enrollment & Demographic Data: Washington State OSPI 2019-2020 Report CardPage 63 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts Support & Collaboration Page 64 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts Lasting Concerns & Impacts Long after construction ends, concerns remain… •Infrastructure Gaps •Sidewalks •Streetlights •Stormwater •Inconsistency •Transportation & infrastructure planning is comprehensive, complex and impacts all of us whether it exists or does not existPage 65 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts Comments received via Online Transportation Open House (Spring-Summer 2020) “Burns road does not go through to rd 68. Huge problem! Also burns road, cars race and drive way too fast.road 68 too much traffic .” “Incomplete sidewalks. The only way to get to sandifur on a sidewalk from my house is to walk out to broadmoor Blvd. there are spots along sandifur that don’t have sidewalk so you have to walk through weedy terrain.” “I like to go for a walk everyday and when I’ve tried to cross Burden to Road 60 no one ever stops even though I’m looking at the cars like I’m trying to cross! I witness this happening to other people too.” “Developments in city limits are springing up all around us, offshooting from Burns and Kohler, with more in the planning, possibly another school. The traffic is getting quite busy on the narrow, wall hemmed in roads, with walkers, runners, small children on bikes, parents pushing strollers and walking pets, adults on off road motor bikes, and people speeding up to 50 mph on roads marked as 25. All in all quite a dangerous, accident waiting to happen situation.” “Long, lonely, walled-off shared use paths are intimidating for women.”Page 66 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts Future Transportation Investments Costs are passed onto every Pasco resident… •Transportation Improvement Plan •Burns Road Pathway (no sidewalk required when development occurred) •Road 92 accessway (lack of access to two new schools)Page 67 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts “Provide for and maintain a safe, integrated, and effective transportation system that promotes connectivity” (2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Goal 1) “Infrastructure, including transportation and utility planning is vital to economic development and attracting businesses” (2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan, Economic Development Policy 1-E) “Ensure that the public has a meaningful opportunity to participate in the planning efforts of the city” (2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan, Implementation Goal 3) “Coordinate with other governmental units in preparing development regulations” (2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan, Implementation Policy 4-A)Page 68 of 99 Transportation Planning Efforts Thank You Q&APage 69 of 99 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 17, 2021 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 3/22/21 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Ordinance - PMC Amendment Related to Lot Size Averaging (MF# CA2020-002) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance Exhibit B - Staff Report to Planning Commission (December 17, 2020) Exhibit C - Meeting Minutes from Planning Commission (December 17, 2020) Exhibit D - City of Pasco House Bill 1923 Authorization Letter Exhibit E - Washington State Department of Commerce Award Letter II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The Washington State Legislature passed the Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 1923 (HB 1923) in 2019, encouraging all cities, planning under the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA), to adopt actions that increase residential building capacities. As directed through HB 1923, the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce) developed a grant program awarding jurisdictions that chose to adopt at least two (2) of the thirteen (13) actions listed in HB 1923. The Pasco City Council authorized the Mayor to execute the authorization letter for the grant application for HB 1923 funding and submittal to the Washington State Department of Commerce (Exhibit D). The City of Pasco was notified of their selection for grant funding in the amount of $40,872.00 on November 5, 2019. (Exhibit E). Pasco proposed three (3) actions associated with HB 1923: Page 70 of 99 1. Authorize at least one duplex, triplex, or courtyard apartment on each parcel singlethat districts zoning permit or one in more -family residences; 2. Authorize cluster zoning, or lot size averaging in all zoning districts that permit single-family residences; and 3. Authorize accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on all parcels containing single-family homes; City staff has prepared a report and presentation for City Council discussion on Item No. 2, above, permitting lot size averaging in all zoning districts that permit single-family residences. What is Lot Size Averaging? Lot size averaging is an approach to subdividing land that allows a parcel of land to be divided into unequally-sized lots as long as the average of all the lot sizes lot size Lot size. zoned remains equal above or to the minimum averaging allows more efficient use of the land and adds additional units that might not be realized. It also adds variety to neighborhoods and provides more home size and style choices. It should be noted that the density allowed remains zoniunderlying the preserves and same the ng and district Comprehensive Plan Land Use. The flexibility allowed by lot size averaging can be useful for development on odd-shaped parcels or properties with topographic, geological, or sensitivity constraints, as well as for mixing housing types in larger developments. In places with rapidly escalating land or construction costs, allowing flexible lot sizes can augment a property’s affordability, especially for moderate -income households. The Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) currently provides two meth ods where lot size flexibility is permitted. Planned Unit Developments (PMC Chapter 25.140) and Planned Density Developments (PMC Chapter 25.145) allow a variety of development flexibilities in addition to lot size including setbacks and overall density in size lot The amenities. other for space open exchange and averaging proposal would be applicable across all zoning districts but would be regulated with threshold allowances. Many cities across Washington have revised their lot size requirements to allow lot size averaging or similar tools to address housing needs and meet growth demands. The table below shows cities (and populations) that have recently adopted ordinances. Table 1: Lot Size Average and Cluster Zoning Cities City Population Page 71 of 99 Bellevue 148,164 Black Diamond 4,781 Bothell 47,415 Edgewood 13,053 Everett 111,475 Federal Way 96,289 Ilwaco 936 Kent 132,319 Kirkland 93,010 Lake Stevens 33,911 Rainier 2,287 Sultan 5,388 Tacoma 217,827 As Table 1 indicates, the use of lot size averaging is not reserved for large or quickly growing cities, rather it is a tool that allows developers and cities to be flexible while maintaining the underlying integrity of each base zoning district. Pasco, with an estimated population of 77,100 (April 1, 2020) would rank among the upper half of the cities represented in Table 1. Existing Lot Size Estimates The average lot size for all residential parcels in Pasco is approximately 0.30 acres the to due high is number or feet. square 13,068 roughly this overwhelming supply of low-density zoning (84%) compared to medium (14%) and high (2%) districts. This average also includes many rural neighborhoods developed at rural densities when platted by Franklin County which were subsequently annexed into the City. Staff reviewed approved residential plats, dating back to the year 2014, which resulted in a total of 27,111 homes with an approximate average lot size of 10,892 square feet. These results encompass each zoning district within the City, ranging with minimum lot sizes of 1,500 sqft (R-4) to 20,000 sqft (RS-20). Further review of lot sizes in Pasco indicated that detached homes averaged 13,068 sqft; attached homes (ex: townhomes) 6,969 sqft and multi-family homes just under 14,000 sqft. Policy Guidance Implementation of lot size averaging would meet the intent of HB 1923. The proposal would also comply with the GMA, specifically the GMA Planning Goal on Housing per RCW 36.70A.020(4) that requires cities to "Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and Page 72 of 99 encourage the preservation of existing housing stock." The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan, approved by the Pasco City Council in Resolution No 3998, includes a Housing Element with the following goals and policies: Housing Goal-1: Encourage housing for all economic segments of the city's population consistent with the local and regional market. Housing Policy H-4-C: Increase housing supply and diversity through appropriate and flexible development standards. On September 21, 2020, the Pasco City Council adopted Resolution No. 3985, establishing Primary Council Goals for the years 2020 -2021, including the development of the Housing Action Plan ("Quality of Life"). This proposal and others related to HB 1923 implements some of the st rategies necessary to address affordable housing in our region. V. DISCUSSION: PMC Title 25 Zoning, specifies a minimum lot size for reach residential zoning district. Table 1 below indicates the current minimum lot sizes for residential zoning districts in Pasco: Zoning District Minimum Lot Size (Square Feet) RS-20 20,000 RS-12 12,000 RS-1 10,000 R-1 7,200 R-2 5,000 (SF); 4,000 (MF) R-3 4,500 (SF); 3,000 (MF) R-4 4,000 (SF); 1,500 (MF) Though the Comprehensive Plan provides density requirements for Land Use, the minimum lot sizes established in the PMC are the most impactful regulation used to govern densities in the City. In addition to the minimum lot size, current regulations prealso setback necessary and coverage lot maximum scribe requirements controlling the use of one lot for housing. Referring back to the Comprehensive Plan's Housing Element Policies, the use of flexible development standards to encourage housing supply and diversity is addressed by the proposed amendment by staff. Proposal Summary The proposed amendment would require additions to the Pasco Urban Area Page 73 of 99 Subdivision Regulations (PMC Title 21). A summary of the proposed changes to accommodate lot size averaging and a new definition are below. Lot Size Averaging: Lot size averaging allows the size of individual lots within a development to vary from the zoned minimum lot size, provided that the average lot size in the development as a whole meets the established minimum of the underlying zoning district. PMC 21.20 Lots and Blocks (1) Lot Size Averaging – in approved short plans, long-plats, and residential subdivisions, the individual lots shall be considered in compliance with the minimum site area requirements if the average of all of the lots within a proposed application is equal to or above the established minimum of the underlying zoning district. Under this provision, either: (a) No individual lot shall be reduced by more than 20% from the minimum required lot size, except lots within ¼ mile as measured through public access or street centerline of an existing, planned, or proposed public facility, lands zoned for government, quasi-public or civic use including medical facilities which may be reduced up to 25%; (b) Lot size reductions shall be compliant with the table below: Zoning District Minimum Lot Size (Current) Lot Size Average (20%) Lot Size Average (25% - 1/4mi Buffer) RS-20 20,000 16,000 15,000 RS-12 12,000 9,600 9,000 RS-1 10,000 8,000 7,500 R-1 7,200 5,760 5,400 R-2 5,000 (SF); 4,000 (MF) 4,000 (SF); 3,200 (MF) 3,750 (SF); 3,000 (MF) R-3 4,500 (SF); 3,000 (MF) 3,600 (SF); 2,400 (MF) 3,375 (SF); 2,250 (MF) R-4 4,000 (SF); 1,500 (MF) 3,200 (SF); 1,200 (MF) 3,000 (SF); 1,125 (MF) (c) Not more than a 40% increase over the required minimum lot area for an individual lot shall be approved when applying the lot size averaging for any proposed application; and (d) No more than 75% of the number of lots in a proposed application may contain an area less than the prescribed minimum for the underlying zoning district. Planning Commission & Environmental Determination Page 74 of 99 This item was presented to the Planning Commission on three occasions, including two public hearings at the November and December 2020 meetings. The SEPA (Environmental) Determination of Non -Significance was issued on December 21, 2020, indicating that the proposal does not have a probable adverse impact on the environment. The Pasco Planning Commission recommended approval of the code amendment and for it to be forwarded to the City Council at the December 17, 2020 meeting. Consistency with Community & Stakeholder Outreach The City has continually reached out to the community and stakeholders for input and interests related to housing. The following are taken from the 2020 Housing Choices Survey (stakeholders) and the 2020 National Citizen Survey for Pasco. •57% - Housing prices are forcing members to seek housing outside of Pasco •95% - More housing options are needed in Pasco •77% - Support or Strongly support allowing more duplexes •64% Support or Strongly Support allowing more triplexes •74% - Support affordable housing incentives •65% - Support zoning changes to increase housing supply •61% - Support letting the “market” decide The proposed PMC amendment for Council's review is consistent with and addresses community and stakeholder input received on creating more housing opportunities in Pasco. Page 75 of 99 Ordinance Amending PMC 21.10.020 and Creating PMC 21.20.070 - 1 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AMENDING SECTION 21.10.020 “TERMS DEFINED” AND CREATING SECTION 21.20.070 “LOT SIZE AVERAGING” OF THE PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, cities planning under the Washington State Growth Management Act are required to plan for the availability of affordable and accessible housing to all economic segments in addition to promoting a variety of residential densities and housing types for the community per RCW 36.70A.020(4); and WHEREAS, projections from the Washington State Office of Financial Management indicate Pasco’s population will increase to 121,828 by the year 2038; and WHEREAS, the 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan anticipates an additional 15,200 housing units will be necessary to accommodate the projected residential growth demands; and WHEREAS, counties and cities planning under the Growth Management Act are required to plan for the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of their communities, encourage the availability of affordable housing and promote a variety of residential densities and housing types per RCW 36.70A.020(4); and WHEREAS, Policy LU-4-B of the 2018-2038 Pasco Comprehensive Plan encourages infill and higher residential densities within proximity to travel corridors and public transportation service areas; and WHEREAS, Policy LU-5-A of the 2018-2038 Pasco Comprehensive Plan states that the allowance of a variety of residential densities within the Urban Growth Area is important to maintaining a broad range of residential housing opportunities; and WHEREAS, Policy H-3-A of the 2018-2038 Pasco Comprehensive Plan supports the increase of the housing supply through appropriate and flexible development standards; and WHEREAS, Priority Need #1 of the 2020-2024 Tri-Cities Consolidated Home Plan identifies the need for affordable housing choices; and WHEREAS, the collaboration with local and regional partners with a focus on strategies that emphasize affordable housing was identified in the 2020-2021 Pasco City Council Goals as adopted in Resolution No 3985. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Page 76 of 99 Ordinance Amending PMC 21.10.020 and Creating PMC 21.20.070 - 2 Section 1. That Section 21.10.020 entitled “Terms defined”, of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 21.10.020 Terms defined. “Alley” means a dedicated narrow service way, not more than 20 feet wide, providing a secondary means of public access to abutting properties. “Binding site plan” means a drawing to scale utilized for the purposes of creating lots for selling, leasing, or otherwise transferring property rights from one person, firm, or corporation to another. A binding site plan: (a) Identifies and shows the areas and locations of all streets, roads, improvements, parcels, utilities, open spaces, and other information as may be required by this title; (b) Contains inscriptions or attachments setting forth such appropriate limitations and conditions for the use of land as specified by this title; and (c) Contains provisions making any development be in conformity with the site plan for all such land. “Block” means a group of lots, tracts, or parcels within a well-defined and fixed boundary. “Boundary line adjustment” means the relocation of the boundaries between two or more lots, which relocation does not result in the creation of any additional lot or lots. “Comprehensive Plan” means the current Comprehensive Plan for the City, adopted by the City Council pursuant to state law. “Cul-de-sac” means a road closed at one end by a circular area of sufficient size for turning vehicles around. “Dedication” means the deliberate conveyance of land by an owner or owners to the City of Pasco, for any general and public uses, reserving to the owner or owners no other rights than such as are compatible with the full exercise and enjoyment of the public uses to which the property has been devoted. “Developer, subdivider, platter or owner” means any person, firm or corporation undertaking the subdividing or resubdividing of a lot, tract or parcel of land as, or on behalf of, the owner thereof. “Easement” means a grant by the property owner to the public, corporation, or persons, of the use of a strip of land for a specific purpose and, on or over which, the owner will not erect any permanent improvements which serve to interfere with the free exercise of that right. “Final approval” means that approval given by the City Council, which authorizes the subdivider to record his/her plat. Page 77 of 99 Ordinance Amending PMC 21.10.020 and Creating PMC 21.20.070 - 3 “Final plat” means the plan of a plat, subdivision, or dedication, or any portion thereof, prepared for filing for record by the County Auditor, and containing all elements and requirements set forth for final plats in these regulations. “Hammerhead/T” means a roadway that provides a “T” shaped, three-point turnaround space for emergency equipment. “Improvements” means any required improvements, including streets, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drainage, landscaping, utilities, pavement markings, signing, and other appropriate improvements. “Lot” means a portion of a subdivision, or other parcel of land, intended as a unit for transfer o f ownership or for development, being of sufficient area and dimensions to meet minimum zoning requirements for width and area. The term shall include tracts or parcels. “Lot Size Averaging” means the area of individual lots within a development may vary from the zoned minimum lot area, provided that the average density in the development as a whole meets the established minimum density of the underlying zoning district, and each individual lot in the application complies with all other restrictions set forth in PMC 20.21.070. “Monument” means a permanent-type survey marker, which conforms to the City of Pasco standard detail for monuments, or an approved substitute. “Pedestrian way” means a right-of-way dedicated to public use which cuts across a block to facilitate pedestrian access to adjacent streets and properties. “Plat or subdivision” means an area of land which has been divided into two or more lots, tracts, parcels or other divisions of land, and shall include a map or maps related thereto for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of transfer of ownership, or for building developments, including all designations in street lines, alley lines, public area boundaries, lot lines, easements, rights-of-way, pavement widths, curb lines, location and size of utilities, location and size of land areas to be dedicated; those divisions of land for agricultural purposes, where each parcel is five acres or more in area and which do not include any new streets, easements, rights-of-way or other provisions for necessary public areas and facilities; and further provided, that this definition shall not apply to the division by description of a portion of a platted lot. “Preliminary plat” means an approximate drawing of the proposed layout of streets, blocks, lots and other elements of a subdivision or plat from which the City Hearing Examiner gives preliminary approval to the general layout features of the subdivision or plat. “Primary arterial” means a street or road of great continuity which serves or is intended to serve as the principal traffic way between separated areas of the City or region and is designated in the Comprehensive Plan, or otherwise designated, as a limited access highway, major thoroughfare, boulevard, parkway or other equivalent term to identify those streets that comprise the basic structure of the regional traffic plan. Page 78 of 99 Ordinance Amending PMC 21.10.020 and Creating PMC 21.20.070 - 4 “Public right-of-way” means any publicly owned land set aside for surface transportation purposes, including vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian transportation, whether improved or not improved. “Secondary arterial” means a street or road which forms part of the arterial street system, the function of which is to collect traffic from the local or residential streets for delivery to the primary arterials. “Short plat” or “short subdivision” means the division or redivision of land into nine or fewer lots for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer of ownership. Street, Dead-End. “Dead-end street” means a street similar to a cul-de-sac, but providing no turnaround at its closed end. Street, Frontage. “Frontage street” means an access street which is generally parallel to and adjacent to arterials, streets, traffic ways, limited access highways or railroad rights-of-way; and which provides access to abutting properties and protection from through traffic. Street, Local Access. “Local access street” means a street of limited continuity, which serves or is intended to serve the local needs of the immediate community. Street, Private. “Private street” means a street of limited continuity, which serves or is intended to serve the local needs of the immediate community and which has not been dedicated to the public. Street, Public. “Public street” means a street, whether improved or unimproved, held in public ownership and intended to be open as a matter of right for public vehicular travel and to provide access now or in the future to adjacent properties. “Tax parcel segregation” means the separation of lots of record into two or more tax parcels for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer of ownership, and which segregation does not result in the creation of more parcels than lots of record. “Urban growth area” means that area design ated by the County pursuant to RCW 36.70A.110, identifying the limits of the extension of urban facilities and services. [Ord. 4496 § 2, 2020; Ord. 3736 § 2, 2005; Ord, 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 §§ 26.08.010-26.08.290.] Section 2. That a new Section 21.20.070 entitled “Lot size averaging” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is created and shall read as follows: 21.20.070 Lot Size Averaging. (1) Lot size averaging. In approved subdivisions within the RS-20, RS-12, RS-1, R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4 zoning designations, the individual lots shall be considered in compliance with the minimum site area requirements if the average of all of the lots within the proposed application are equal to or above Page 79 of 99 Ordinance Amending PMC 21.10.020 and Creating PMC 21.20.070 - 5 the established minimum of the underlying zoning district. In addition, the following conditions must also be met: (a) No individual lot shall be reduced by more than 20% from the minimum required lot size, except lots within ¼ mile as measured through a public access or street centerline of an existing, planned or proposed public facility, lands zoned for government, quasi - public or civic use including medical facilities which may be reduced up to 25%. (b) Lot size reductions under subparagraph (a) shall be compliant with the table below: Zoning District Minimum Lot Size - Current (sqft) Twenty Percent Reduction from- Standard (sqft) Twenty Five Percent Reduction from Standard– ¼ (sqft) RS-20 20,000 16,000 15,000 RS-12 12,000 9,600 9,000 RS-1 10,000 8,000 7,500 R-1 7,200 5,760 5,400 R-2 5,000 (SF); 4,000 (MF) 4,000 (SF); 3,200 (MF) 3,750 (SF); 3,000 (MF) R-3 4,500 (SF); 3,000 (MF) 3,600 (SF); 2,400 (MF) 3,375 (SF); 2,250 (MF) R-4 4,000 (SF); 1,500 (MF) 3,200 (SF); 1,200 (MF) 3,000 (SF); 1,125 (MF) (c) No more than a 40% increase over the minimum lot area for any individual lot shall be approved. (d) No more than 75% of the total number of lots in a proposed application may contain an area less than the prescribed minimum for the underlying zoning district. (e) When recording any final plat subject to lot size averaging, the developer must include a restrictive covenant outlining the transferred development rights of the larger parcel to the smaller parcels. Such covenant should restrict subsequent purchasers from developing the larger parcel in a manner inconsistent with the lot size averaging, as established through the platting process, and except as modified by subsequent rezones. Section 3. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by the law. Page 80 of 99 Ordinance Amending PMC 21.10.020 and Creating PMC 21.20.070 - 6 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, this day of , . Saul Martinez Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ _______________________________ Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC City Clerk City Attorney Published: _____________________________ Page 81 of 99 MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers DATE: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2020 6:30 PM 1 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CA2020-002 – House Bill 1923 (Lot Size Averaging) Background In September 2019, the Pasco City Council approved staff’s recommendation to study the potential benefits and impacts of three proposed code amendments associated with House Bill 1923 (HB 1923). Staff has evaluated the impacts and benefits of permitting lot size averaging in all residential zoning districts of the City. The specific action proposed, per House Bill 1923: •Authorize cluster zoning (lot size averaging) in all zoning districts that permit single- family residences; Current Requirements Title 25 (Zoning) of the Pasco Municipal Code specifies a minimum lot size for reach residential zoning district. Table 1 below indicates the current minimum lot sizes for residential zoning districts in Pasco: Table 1: Zoning District Minimum Lot Size (square feet) RS-20 20,000 RS-12 12,000 RS-1 10,000 R-1 7,200 R-2 5,000 (SF); 4,000 (MF) R-3 4,500 (SF); 3,000 (MF) R-4 4,000 (SF); 1,500 (MF) Although the Comprehensive Plan provides density requirements for Land Use, the minimum lot sizes established in the PMC is the most impactful regulation used to govern densities in the City. The requirement of a minimum lot size mandates that all parcels of land for housing developments be larger than a certain size, regardless of environment and adjacent infrastructure. For example, the RS-12 zoning district calls for lots that are a minimum of 12,000 square feet, which yields a density of 3.63 dwelling units per acre. The minimum certainly adds clarity for those seeking to subdivide lots at a small scale, or large home-builders and developers seeking to build dozens of new units, but they may also prohibit EXHIBIT #B Page 82 of 99 2 the efficient utilization of available land for housing. In addition to the minimum lot size, current regulations also prescribe a maximum lot coverage and necessary setback requirements controlling the use of one lot for housing. What is Lot Size Averaging? Lot size averaging is an approach to subdividing land that allows a parcel of land to be divided into unequally-sized lots as long as the average of all the lot sizes remains equal to or above the minimum zoned lot size. Lot size averaging allows more efficient use of the land and adds additional units that might not be realized. It also adds variety to neighborhoods and provides more home size and style choices. It should be noted that the density allowed remains the same and preserves the underlying zoning district and Comprehensive Plan Land Use. The flexibility and variety allowed by lot size averaging can be useful for developing housing on unusually shaped parcels or properties with critical areas, as well as for mixing housing types in larger developments. In places with rapidly escalating land or construction costs, smaller lot sizes can augment a property’s affordability, especially for moderate-income households. Many cities across Washington have revised their lot size requirements to allow lot size averaging or similar tools to address housing needs and meet growth demands. The table below shows cities (and populations) who have recently adopted ordinances. Table 2: Lot Size Average and Cluster Zoning Cities City Population (2019) Bellevue 148,164 Everett 111,475 Kirkland 93,010 Lake Stevens 33,911 Sultan 5,388 Snohomish 10,154 Tacoma 217,827 Black Diamond 4,781 Bothell 47,415 Edgewood 13,053 Federal Way 96,289 Ilwaco 936 Kent 132,319 Rainier 2,287 As Table 2 indicates, the use of lot size averaging is not reserved for large or quickly growing cities, rather it is tool that allows developers and cities to be flexible while maintaining the underlying integrity of each base zoning district. Page 83 of 99 3 Policy Guidance Implementation of lot size averaging would meet the intent of Engrossed Senate House Bill 1923. The proposal would also comply with the Growth Management Act, specifically the GMA Planning Goal on Housing per RCW 36.70A.020(4) that requires cities to Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. The 2018-2038 Comprehensive Plan approved by Council in Resolution No 3998 (awaiting certification from Franklin County) included numerous housing references including Housing Goal #1 Encourage housing for all economic segments of the city’s population consistent with the local and regional market and Housing Policy H-4-C Increase housing supply and diversity through appropriate and flexible development standards. Resolution No 3985, passed by the City Council on September 21, 2020 established Primary Council Goals for the years 2020-2021. The Development of a Housing Action Plan was included that would develop a series of strategies aimed at increasing affordable housing. One of the strategies points back to the housing policy on flexible development standards, which would include lot size averaging. The Pasco Municipal Code currently provides two methods where lot size flexibility is permitted. Planned Unit Developments (PMC25.140) and Planned Density Developments (PMC 25.145) allow a variety of development flexibilities in addition to lot size including setbacks and overall density in exchange for open space and other amenities. The lot size averaging proposal would be applicable across all zoning districts but would be regulated with threshold allowances. Existing Lot Size Estimates The average lot size for all residential parcels in Pasco is approximately 0.30 acres, or roughly 13,068 square feet. As indicated in prior staff reports, this number is high due to the overwhelmingly supply of low-density zoning (84%) compared to medium (14%) and high (2%) districts. This average also includes many rural neighborhoods developed at rural densities when platted by Franklin County which were subsequently annexed into the City. Staff reviewed approved residential plats, dating back to the year 2014, which resulted in a total of 27,111 homes with an approximate average lot size of 10,892 square feet. These results encompass each zoning district within the city, ranging with minimum lot sizes of 1,500 sqft (R- 4) to 20,000 sqft (RS-20). Further review of lots sizes in Pasco indicated that detached homes averaged 13,068 sqft; attached homes (ex: townhomes) 6,969 sqft and multi-family homes just under 14,000 sqft. Across the country, lot sizes continue to decrease. The median lot size for a detached home decreased to 8,177 square feet, 5% lower than 2018 1. The National Association of Home Builders 1 Median Single-Family Lot Size Hits Record Low Page 84 of 99 4 estimates that detached homes along the western states of Washington, Oregon and California are the smallest in the country at 6,354 square feet. Similar trends exist in multi-family and apartment sizes. Since 2000, the average apartment unit size has decreased from 1,031 square feet to 931 square feet across the country. Summary of Amendment Proposal The following draft set of revisions offer options for the Planning Commission to consider prior to a formal recommendation. New term and definition to be added: Lot Size Averaging: Lot size averaging allows the size of individual lots within a development to vary from the zoned minimum lot size, provided that the average lot size in the development as a whole meets the established minimum of the underlying zoning district PMC 21.20 Lots and Blocks (1) Lot Size Averaging – in approved short plans, long-plats and residential subdivisions, the individual lots shall be considered in compliance with the minimum site area requirements if the average of all of the lots within a proposed application are equal to or above the established minimum of the underlying zoning district. Under this provision, either: (a) No individual lot shall be reduced by more than 20% from the minimum require lot size, except lots within ¼ mile as measured through a public access or street centerline of an existing, planned or proposed public facility, lands zoned for government, quasi- public or civic use including medical facilities which may be reduced up to 25% (b) Lot size reductions shall be compliant with the table below: Zoning District Minimum Lot Size - Current (sqft) Lot Size Average - Standard (sqft) Lot Size Average – ¼ (sqft) RS-20 20,000 16,000 15,000 RS-12 12,000 9,600 9,000 RS-1 10,000 8,000 7,500 R-1 7,200 5,760 5,400 R-2 5,000 (SF); 4,000 (MF) 4,000 (SF); 3,200 (MF) 3,750 (SF); 3,000 (MF) R-3 4,500 (SF); 3,000 (MF) 3,600 (SF); 2,400 (MF) 3,375 (SF); 2,250 (MF) R-4 4,000 (SF); 1,500 (MF) 3,200 (SF); 1,200 (MF) 3,000 (SF); 1,125 (MF) https://nahbnow.com/2020/10/median-single-family-lot-size-hits-record-low/ Page 85 of 99 5 c) Not more than a 40% increase over the requirement minimum lot area for individual lot shall be approved when applying the lot size averaging for any proposed application d) No more than 75% of the number of lots in a proposed application may contain an area less than the prescribed minimum for the underlying zoning district Recommendation MOTION: I move to close the public hearing on the proposed code amendment for House Bill 1923, # CA2020-002 and recommend to the Pasco City Council the adoption of the proposed code amendment for Lot Size Averaging as contained in the December 17, 2020 Planning Commission staff report. Page 86 of 99 PUBLIC HEARINGS Code Amendment- House Bill 1923- Lot Size Avg. (MF#2020-002) Jacob Gonzalez stated members of the planning commission averaging was one of the three proposed actions to be considered for adoption in conjunction with House Bill 1923, the Pasco City Council had authorized staff's intent to adopt three actions associated with the bill back in September of 2019. The next slide, you can see the three proposed actions and we will focus on an action number two. Tonight, staff prepared a presentation summarizing the use and benefits of size averaging along with the staff recommendation for approval and a draft ordinance shared in your Planning Commission report today. So lot size averaging as a tool and method that allows for the subdivision of land to occur that permits lots below the established minimum if the average of all plots is equal to that minimum. So as an example, the proposed subdivision in the iris, one district in Pasco, which requires 10,000 square feet, lots would be permitted under that 10,000 square foot if the average of all of the proposed lots was at least 10,000 square feet. Some of the noted and intended benefits, a lot size averaging include increased design flexibility for homebuilders, property owners and developers, the efficiency of land use and the promotion of infill and design and density considerations. Results of the Housing Choices survey, which is that the pie chart in the bottom right of that last slide had indicated that 64% of responses were favorable and in support of flexible standards in the municipal code. So staff is proposing that we allow a 20% allowance below the minimum for all residential zoning districts and for those parcels and residential lots within a quarter mile, 1320 of a public facility or amenities such as a school, park hospital or transit corridor would be permitted a 25% allowance to go below the threshold. The following slide here shows us a map of the of how that would be allowed in the city of Pasco under the current proposal. So in the light green are all of the residential parcels. And I'll say that this map may not be up to date as of December of 2020, but it is just shown here to give us a sense of our residential development here in the city so that light green are all residential parcels. Those in green are within a quarter mile of a public facility or amenities such as a school park, et cetera. Those in that light purple are the vacant residential lots. If you remember from the 2018 line capacity work that the city conducted for the comprehensive plan at urban growth area expansion that the city had at the time of October, 2018 less than 560 vacant residential parcels. We expect that this would be a tool that would be available for the remaining vacant parcels and potentially valuable for those that are seeking to subdivide if they can meet the zoning requirements. The proposal for the Planning Commission tonight for consideration is the draft ordinance that would permit losses averaging in the city of Pasco for our residential zoning districts. It would be a 20% allowance on all zones, on all residential parcels and an 25% allowance for those within a quarter mile of a public land use. Also want to mention that staff is now incorporating legal review before it comes to the Planning Commission. We believe that's in obviously the city's best interest and so that the Planning Commission can look at an ordinance has been vetted by our legal counsel here at the city. There are also certain criteria with the lot size averaging that would ensure that appropriate development occurs, including that no more than 25% of all of the lots would be allowed to be below the establishment. So if you have one hundred lots and the answer is 20, no more than 75 of those lots could be below 20 thousand square feet. We don't expect that EXHIBIT #C Page 87 of 99 to ever be a problem here. However, better to put that in the provisions and to ask for it later when it's too late. So that is staff's proposal and recommendation to the Planning Commission for approval of lot size averaging. Commissioner Abel Campos stated the 20% is that kind of normal, how all the cities are doing it or how do we come to that percentage. Jacob Gonzalez stated the 20% or 25% threshold, I believe is going on in some of the jurisdictions that have recently passed it is that there is no threshold is just as a lot size average. When you try to pencil out of 50 or 60 or even 10 lots to go below the threshold and still meet the minimum with all the average is rather difficult. And perhaps that's why there is no threshold that is specifically stated in their municipal zoning codes. However, I think it's in the Pasco's best interests to just put a cap, a maximum of what we would permit. I believe I think staff's intent would be that that ensures that there's some consistency in neighborhood development patterns. Commissioner Hendler stated is there a minimum dimension to these lot size averages. Jacob Gonzalez stated speaking of dimensioned would be a lot to achieve their requirements with the each zoning district and municipal code has a development standard section which dictates not only the minimum lot size, but also the frontage requirements. So they vary between thirty five in the dense areas with zero lot line construction all the way up to, I believe, 90 feet in the is 20. That's the 20 thousand square foot zoning district. There's also some provisions in the code that state that I believe it's two and a half times that the length of a lot shall not be more than two and a half times the width. And that's probably to protect or to maybe deter from developments that end up being with the kind of odd shaped lots, your flag lots. So there are some provisions in the code to ensure that that doesn't occur. But, yeah, the city does have standards for a lot with frontages, et cetera.  Commissioner Myhrum stated the recommendation is we move to close the public hearing on the proposed code amendment for House Bill 1923 number 2020-001 and recommend to the Pasco City Council the adoption of the proposed code amendment. Commissioner A Campos seconded and the motion carried. Page 88 of 99 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR• (509) 545-3404 • FAX (509) 545-3403 P.O. Box 293 • 525 North 3 rd Ave.• Pasco, WA 99301 www.pasco-wa.gov October 7, 2019 I, Matt Watkins, Mayor of Pasco, Washington, authorize the city to propose the attached scope of work and budget request for E2SHB 1923 grant funding to increase residential building capacity. The following items are identified as actions the City of Pasco intends to take action on: •Authorize at least one duplex, triplex, or courtyard apartment on each parcel in one or more zoning districts that permit single-family residences. •Authorize cluster zoning or lot size averaging in all zoning districts that permit single- family residences. •Authorize accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on all parcels containing single-family homes. The intended actions represent an opportunity for the City of Pasco to meet Council goals for the revitalization of older neighborhoods, improve the efficiency of public and municipal resources and increase the opportunity for infill development. The expected population growth will be better accommodated by moving forward with innovative strategies identified by the intended actions in HB 1923. The ongoing Comprehensive Plan efforts have included updated goals and policies that align with the intent of HB 1923 while recently adopted code amendments have allowed for more flexibility in housing construction via reduced lot sizes and frontages, height increases and the utilization of shared (private) access ways in hard to develop lots. We agree to adopt the ordinances and/or plans that result from the grant, by April 1, 2021, acknowledging that, at minimum, the actions must meet the requirements of E2SHB 1923. Sincerely, Matt Watkins Mayor EXHIBIT #D Page 89 of 99 STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 1011 Plum Street SE  PO Box 42525  Olympia, Washington 98504-2525  (360) 725-4000 www.commerce.wa.gov November 5, 2019 The Honorable Matt Watkins Mayor of Pasco 525 N 3rd Avenue Pasco, Washington 99301 RE: E2SHB 1923 Grant – Increasing Residential Building Capacity Dear Mayor Watkins: I am pleased to inform you that the city of Pasco has been awarded $40,872.00 in grant funds for the 2019-21 Biennium to assist with increasing urban residential building capacity and streamlining regulations. The Washington State Legislature created this new grant program under Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill (E2SHB) 1923 (Chapter 348, Laws of 2019), which provides a number of eligible land use planning activities for cities to consider implementing to increase housing capacity. Your jurisdiction recently submitted a grant application, identifying actions it intends to develop and adopt, as well as its grant funding need to assist with this work. Your scope of work and budget must be consistent with the scope of work and budget included in your grant application. This grant will be administered by the Washington Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services unit. Before we disburse the funds, a contract with an agreed upon scope of work and budget will need to be executed between your organization and the Department of Commerce. Funds may be retroactively applied to project costs related to your grant scope of work, beginning July 28, 2019, the effective date of E2SHB 1923. William Simpson, Senior Planner is available to help you if you have any questions. Please call (509) 280-3602 or will.simpson@commerce.wa.gov for assistance with this contract going forward. Sincerely, Dave Andersen, AICP Managing Director Growth Management Services cc: Jacob Gonzalez, Senior Planner William Simpson EXHIBIT #E Page 90 of 99 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council March 22, 2021 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager City Council Workshop Meeting: 3/22/21 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Finance Director Finance SUBJECT: Carryover Funds for Capital Projects from 2019-2020 Biennium I. REFERENCE(S): Capital Projects with Proposed Budgets II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Various Funds - $57,103,521 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Budget carry forward/carryover for capital projects is a business standard adopted by a majority of organizations. This process accommodates project schedules crossing budget periods and schedule delays. The City of Pasco had not adopted this process, resulting in staff expending significant time to make estimates for the year during the budgeting process and resulting in inaccurate budget authorizations when such basis of estimates changed. During 2021-2022 Biennial Budget preparation, staff recommended a change in the budgeting process to allow for the carryover budgeting for capital projects. Operational budgets will continue to be authorized during the biennial budgeting process and any changes to the budget will be brought to Council as such needs are identified. Staff has reimplemented a project accounting module in the financial system that allows for the tracking of the project budgets in a more effective and centralized manner. Page 91 of 99 V. DISCUSSION: Staff has prepared a carryover budget adjustment request to Council, which is attached. The carryover requests are calculated with not just an authorized budget at the time of its approval, but new information provided by various departments. Favorable bidding terms, changes in anticipated grant funding, and other new information have reduced the project budgets by $17M. Staff has reduced the budget where necessary; however, any request to increase budget will be routed to Council as such needs are identified. In addition to authorization of carryover funding, staff is requesting additional project allocation for Maitland Lift Station ($96K) and Wrigley Drive Extension ($39K). Allocation for Wrigley Drive Extension was an omission error on staff's part during the 2019-2020 budget adjustment, and Maitland Lift Station costs are expected to be higher than previously anticipated costs. The attached report will provide further details on individual projects. Page 92 of 99 Category Project Number Project Name Revenue Source 2021 Carryover2021-2022 Budgeted Allocation Increase Project Budget Grand Total Major Revenue Changes01 CIP Gen Govt 19 997GESA Stadium Improvement Secured LTGO Bond 810,478 810,478GESA Stadium Improvement Total810,478 810,47821 213City Hall Remodel Phase II Transfer from Fund 193 REET1 62,887 62,887City Hall Remodel Phase II Total62,887 62,88721 257Community Center Secured LTGO Bond 1,150,000 1,150,000Community Center Total1,150,000 1,150,00021 262Wayfinding and Signage Transfer from General Fund 415,000 415,000Wayfinding and Signage Total415,000 415,00001 CIP Gen Govt Total2,438,365 2,438,36502 CIP Econ Dev 17 999Animal Shelter Facility Secured LTGO Bond 1,944,379 1,944,379Secured City of Kennewick 1,911,721 1,911,721Secured City of Richland 1,911,721 1,911,721Animal Shelter Facility Total5,767,821 5,767,82102 CIP Econ Dev Total5,767,821 5,767,82103 CIP Transport 12 001Argent Road Widening (Road 36th to 20th Ave) Secured Columbia Basin College 800,000 800,000Secured Port of Pasco 716,438 716,438Transfer from Arterial Fund 85,442 85,442Argent Road Widening (Road 36th to 20th Ave) Total1,601,880 1,601,88013 007Lewis Street Overpass Secured Connecting Washington 1,909,782 11,385,630 13,295,412Secured Washington State Department of Transportation MVA 4,400,000 4,400,000Secured Washington State TIB 5,000,000 5,000,000Transfer from Arterial Fund 118,381 6,000 124,381Transfer from Street Overlay Fund 891,099 2,987,000 3,878,099Transfer from Fund 193 REET2 128,821 128,821Transfer from Water Fund 137,000 137,000Transfer from Stromwater Fund 165,000 165,000Lewis Street Overpass Total12,750,083 14,378,630 27,128,71315 009Wrigley Drive Extension Secured Washington State STP 223,555 39,445 263,000Transfer from Arterial Fund 2,395 2,395Transfer from Water Fund 47,655 47,655Transfer from Irrigation Fund 19,655 19,655Transfer from Sewer Fund 31,655 31,655Transfer from Stromwater Fund 45,060 45,060Wrigley Drive Extension Total369,975 39,445 409,42016 010James Street Improvements Transfer from Street Overlay Fund 469,271 469,271James Street Improvements Total469,271 469,27117 014City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements ? Phase 2 Secured United States Department of Transportation HIP 405,987 405,987Secured United States Department of Transportation STBG 1,402,058 748,711 2,150,769Secured United States Department of Transportation TAP 146,891 146,891Transfer from Arterial Fund 51,428 51,428Transfer from I-182 Impact Fund 107,932 530,000 637,932City Wide Traffic Signal Improvements ? Phase 2 Total1,708,309 1,684,698 3,393,00719 043Court Street & Road 68 Intersection Improvements Secured United States Department of Transportation STBG 86,352 64,875 151,227Transfer from Arterial Fund 5,390 5,390Transfer from I-182 Impact Fund75,000 75,000Court Street & Road 68 Intersection Improvements Total91,742 139,875 231,61720 007Lewis Street Corridor Improvements - 2nd to 5th Ave Secured Washington State Legislative Grant339,000 339,000Unsecured Unknown Federal Grant530,000 530,000Transfer from CDBG Fund 292,634 348,000 640,634Transfer from Fund 193 REET1 175,870 368,000 543,870Transfer from Stromwater Fund 100,000 100,000Lewis Street Corridor Improvements - 2nd to 5th Ave Total568,504 1,585,000 2,153,50420 008Signage & Striping Improvements at Rd 68 & Burden Blvd Secured Federal STPUL 177,771 177,771Transfer from Arterial Fund 21,866 21,866Signage & Striping Improvements at Rd 68 & Burden Blvd Total199,637 199,63720 009Road 68 Widening - South of I-182 Secured Federal STPUL 192,639 192,639Transfer from Arterial Fund 64,905 64,905Road 68 Widening - South of I-182 Total257,544 257,54420 010Argent Road Widening (Road 36 to Saraceno) Secured Columbia Basin College00Secured Port of Pasco00Transfer from Arterial Fund 64,097 420,000 484,097Argent Road Widening (Road 36 to Saraceno) Total64,097 420,000 484,09720 012Burns Road Pathway - Phase 1 (Rd 100 to Rd 90) Transfer from Fund 193 REET219,170 152,000 171,170Burns Road Pathway - Phase 1 (Rd 100 to Rd 90) Total19,170 152,000 171,17020 101North Industrial Way Infiltration Retrofit Project & Overlay Transfer from Street Overlay Fund500,000 500,000Transfer from Stromwater Fund 150,000 150,000North Industrial Way Infiltration Retrofit Project & Overlay Total150,000 500,000 650,000 Page 93 of 99 Category Project Number Project Name Revenue Source 2021 Carryover2021-2022 Budgeted Allocation Increase Project Budget Grand Total Major Revenue Changes03 CIP Transport 20 102Court Street Overlay Transfer from Street Overlay Fund550,000 550,000Court Street Overlay Total550,000 550,00021 225Burns Road Pathway - Phase 2 (Rd 90 to 84) Transfer from Fund 193 REET223,000 111,000 134,000Burns Road Pathway - Phase 2 (Rd 90 to 84) Total23,000 111,000 134,00021 226Burns Road Pathway - Phase 3 (Rd 84 to 68) Transfer from Fund 193 REET2 23,000 23,000Burns Road Pathway - Phase 3 (Rd 84 to 68) Total23,000 23,00021 227Sylvester Street Safety Program - Phase 1 Secured Washington State HSIP469,000 469,000Transfer from Arterial Fund52,000 52,000Sylvester Street Safety Program - Phase 1 Total521,000 521,00021 228Sylvester Street Safety Program - Phase 2 Secured Washington State HSIP00Unsecured Washington State HSIP381,000 381,000Transfer from Fund 193 REET295,000 95,000Sylvester Street Safety Program - Phase 2 Total476,000 476,00021 229Argent Road Widening (Intersection Improvement) Secured Columbia Basin College310,000 310,000Secured Port of Pasco310,000 310,000Transfer from Arterial Fund00Argent Road Widening (Intersection Improvement) Total620,000 620,00021 230South 10th Ave and W Lewis Street Advanced Intersection Warning Secured Washington State HSIP41,900 41,900Transfer from Arterial Fund6,000 6,000South 10th Ave and W Lewis Street Advanced Intersection Warning Total47,900 47,90021 231Sandifur Parkway Widening - Road 52 to Road 60 Transfer from Street Overlay Fund458,000 458,000Sandifur Parkway Widening - Road 52 to Road 60 Total458,000 458,00021 232Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street Overpass Unsecured Unknown State Grant200,000 200,000Transfer from Arterial Fund100,000 100,000Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street Overpass Total300,000 300,00021 233Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 100 Interchange Unsecured Unknown State Grant102,000 102,000Transfer from Arterial Fund18,000 18,000Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 100 Interchange Total120,000 120,00021 234North Road 100 Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements Transfer from Fund 193 REET1350,000 350,000North Road 100 Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements Total350,000 350,00021 235Annual Pavement Preservation Transfer from Street Overlay Fund728,000 728,000Annual Pavement Preservation Total728,000 728,00003 CIP Transport Total18,296,212 23,142,103 39,445 41,477,76005 CIP Parks Rec 16 001Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering Unsecured Washington State Recreation Conservation Office 151,000 1,827,000 1,978,000Transfer from General Fund 00Transfer from Fund 193 REET1 39,688 830,000 869,688Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering Total190,688 2,657,000 2,847,68816 014Peanuts Park Restoration Secured Washington State Legislative Grant 150,000 150,000Secured Housing and Urban Development Section 108 3,800,000 3,800,000Transfer from General Fund 1,205,744 1,205,744Transfer from Fund 193 REET2 1,184,809 1,184,809Peanuts Park Restoration Total6,340,553 6,340,55316 999Schlagel Park Boating Facilities Updates Secured Washington State Recreation Conservation Office 563,933 563,933Transfer from Fund 193 REET1 210,591 210,591Schlagel Park Boating Facilities Updates Total774,524 774,52418 998Softball Complex Updates Transfer from Fund 193 REET1 240,000 240,000Softball Complex Updates Total240,000 240,00018 999Chapel Hill Park Funded By Park Development Fund 626,058 626,058Chapel Hill Park Total626,058 626,05821 155A Street Sports Complex Phase 1 Secured Washington State Recreation Conservation Office 328,548 328,548Funded By Park Development Fund 170,846 170,846A Street Sports Complex Phase 1 Total499,394 499,39421 212Road 48 Park Unfunded - No Revenue Identified50,000 50,000Road 48 Park Total50,000 50,00021 217Marina Dock B Replacement Funded by Funded By Rivershore Trail and Marina Maintenance Fund 200,000 200,000Marina Dock B Replacement Total200,000 200,00021 218Highland Park Improvements Unsecured Unknown 35,000 35,000Transfer from CDBG Fund 55,000 55,000Funded By Park Development Fund75,000 75,000Transfer from Fund 193 REET2 62,929 62,929Highland Park Improvements Total152,929 75,000 227,92921 219Road 84 Park Funded By Park Development Fund 154,130 270,000 424,130Road 84 Park Total154,130 270,000 424,13021 220Franklin County Irrigation District (FCID) Trail Phase 1 and 2 Unsecured Washington State Recreation Conservation Office 360,000 360,000Transfer from Fund 193 REET255,000 55,000Franklin County Irrigation District (FCID) Trail Phase 1 and 2 Total415,000 415,00021 258Community Park Northwest Funded By Park Development Fund 1,400,000 1,400,000 Page 94 of 99 Category Project Number Project Name Revenue Source 2021 Carryover2021-2022 Budgeted Allocation Increase Project Budget Grand Total Major Revenue Changes05 CIP Parks Rec 21 258 Community Park Northwest Total1,400,000 1,400,00021 259Kurtzman Shelter Transfer from Fund 193 REET1 125,000 125,000Kurtzman Shelter Total125,000 125,00021 260Road 54 Erwen Property Funded By Park Development Fund 20,000 20,000Road 54 Erwen Property Total20,000 20,00021 261Sacajawea Trail Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Crossing Transfer from Fund 193 REET2 125,000 125,000Sacajawea Trail Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Crossing Total125,000 125,00005 CIP Parks Rec Total10,648,276 3,667,000 14,315,27606 CIP Pub Sfty 19 998Fire Station 83 Replacement Secured LTGO Bond 1,226,621 1,226,621Fire Station 83 Replacement Total1,226,621 1,226,62119 999Fire Station 84 Replacement Secured LTGO Bond 1,413,4703,040,000 4,453,470Fire Station 84 Replacement Total1,413,470 3,040,000 4,453,47020 999Fire Station 81 Remodel Secured LTGO Bond 170,525 170,525Fire Station 81 Remodel Total170,525 170,52521 198Fire Station 82 Remodel Secured LTGO Bond -262,402 -262,402Fire Station 82 Remodel Total-262,402 -262,40221 199Fire Station 85 Secured LTGO Bond449,000 449,000Transfer from Fund 193 REET2 39,115 39,115Fire Station 85 Total39,115 449,000 488,11521 200Fire Training Center Restroom Secured LTGO Bond 299,433 299,433Fire Training Center Restroom Total299,433 299,43321 202Fire Stations Alerting Systems Transfer from General Fund -327,007 262,000 -65,007Fire Stations Alerting Systems Total-327,007 262,000 -65,00721 203Fire Station 87 Transfer from General Fund265,000 265,000Fire Station 87 Total265,000 265,00021 214Training Center Improvements Secured LTGO Bond142,000 142,000Training Center Improvements Total142,000 142,00021 221Fire Stations Alerting Systems Secured LTGO Bond 0 0 0Fire Stations Alerting Systems Total00 006 CIP Pub Sfty Total2,559,755 4,158,000 6,717,75521 CIP Water 16 008West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Expansion Secured Revenue Bond -75,000 775,000 700,000Secured Washington Department of Health Safe Drinking Water Loan-700,000 700,000 0Transfer from Water Fund 2,772,068 0 2,772,068West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Expansion Total1,997,068 1,475,000 3,472,06817 004Butterfield WTP - Chlorine Safety Improvements Secured Revenue Bond 00Butterfield WTP - Chlorine Safety Improvements Total0018 059WWTP PLC and Controls Upgrade Secured Revenue Bond 271,456 271,456WWTP PLC and Controls Upgrade Total271,456 271,45619 046Water Main Replacement - Star Lane (Rd 100 to Rd 97)Transfer from Water Fund235,000 235,000Water Main Replacement - Star Lane (Rd 100 to Rd 97) Total235,000 235,00019 073Water Main Replacement - Alley East of Wehe Ave Secured Revenue Bond 214,202 214,202Transfer from Water Fund -107,101 -107,101Water Main Replacement - Alley East of Wehe Ave Total107,101 107,10120 030Water Main Replacement - Maple Dr AC Main (Rd 100 to Rd 103) Transfer from Water Fund 212,973 212,973Water Main Replacement - Maple Dr AC Main (Rd 100 to Rd 103) Total212,973 212,97321 238Transmission Main -WPWTP to Zone 3 Transfer from Water Fund 500,000 2,500,000 3,000,000Transmission Main -WPWTP to Zone 3 Total500,000 2,500,000 3,000,00021 243Emergency Power Improvements Transfer from Water Fund 250,000 1,100,000 1,350,000Emergency Power Improvements Total250,000 1,100,000 1,350,00021 244Water Main Replacement - Richardson Road (Rd 92 to Rd 96) Transfer from Water Fund460,000 460,000Water Main Replacement - Richardson Road (Rd 92 to Rd 96) Total460,000 460,00021 245Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Improvements Unsecured Revenue Bond5,000,000 5,000,000Butterfield Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Improvements Total5,000,000 5,000,00021 246Water Main Ext - Alton St (Wehe Ave to the alley west of Owe Transfer from Water Fund187,000 187,000Water Main Ext - Alton St (Wehe Ave to the alley west of Owe Total187,000 187,00021 247Water Main Ext - Road 103 (Maple Street to Willow Way) Transfer from Water Fund113,000 113,000Water Main Ext - Road 103 (Maple Street to Willow Way) Total113,000 113,00021 248Water Main Replacement - South 18th Ave (Court Street to WA Ave) Transfer from Water Fund79,000 79,000Water Main Replacement - South 18th Ave (Court Street to WA Ave) Total79,000 79,00021 249Automated Meter Reading Unsecured Revenue Bond1,750,000 1,750,000Automated Meter Reading Total1,750,000 1,750,00021 250Annual Water Upsize - Development Funded By Water Fund - Expansion Fees200,000 200,000Annual Water Upsize - Development Total200,000 200,00021 251Annual Water System Improvements - Development Funded By Water Fund - Expansion Fees200,000 200,000Annual Water System Improvements - Development Total200,000 200,00021 252Reservoir Storage Tank Unsecured Revenue Bond4,200,000 4,200,000Funded By Water Fund - Expansion Fees 750,000 2,250,000 3,000,000 Page 95 of 99 Category Project Number Project Name Revenue Source 2021 Carryover2021-2022 Budgeted Allocation Increase Project Budget Grand Total Major Revenue Changes21 CIP Water 21 252 Reservoir Storage Tank Total750,000 6,450,000 7,200,00021 CIP Water Total4,088,598 19,749,000 23,837,59822 CIP Irrig 21 222Well Capacity Upgrades Transfer from Irrigation Fund470,000 470,000Well Capacity Upgrades Total470,000 470,00021 223Annual Irrigation Upsize - Development Transfer from Irrigation Fund100,000 100,000Annual Irrigation Upsize - Development Total100,000 100,00021 224Annual Irrigation System Improvements - Development Transfer from Irrigation Fund50,000 50,000Annual Irrigation System Improvements - Development Total50,000 50,00021 264Columbia River Intake Capacity Upgrades Transfer from Irrigation Fund 229,000 229,000Columbia River Intake Capacity Upgrades Total229,000 229,00022 CIP Irrig Total229,000 620,000 849,00023 CIP Sewer 15 002Pearl Street Lift Station Secured Revenue Bond -12,400 -12,400Pearl Street Lift Station Total-12,400 -12,40015 003Maitland Lift Station Secured Revenue Bond 102,031 96,000 198,031Maitland Lift Station Total102,031 96,000 198,03116 006Road 36 Lift Station Upgrades Secured Revenue Bond 0 0 0Transfer from Sewer Fund 638,807 134,000 772,807Road 36 Lift Station Upgrades Total638,807 134,000 772,80716 0079th & Washington Lift Station Secured Revenue Bond 585,332 585,3329th & Washington Lift Station Total585,332 585,33218 076Northwest Area (Broadmoor) Sewer LID (#151) Secured LID Bond2,307,310 2,307,310Unsecured LID Bond 0 0 0Transfer from Sewer Fund - Expansion Fees 0 0 0Northwest Area (Broadmoor) Sewer LID (#151) Total0 2,307,310 2,307,3102021-2022 reduced from 3.7M to 2.3M19 053Road 52 & Pearl Street Lift Station Secured Revenue Bond300,000 300,000Road 52 & Pearl Street Lift Station Total300,000 300,00019 072WWTP Improvements Phase 1 Secured Revenue Bond 241,304 241,304Unsecured Revenue Bond4,460,000 4,460,000Secured Washington Department of Ecology Loan 2,200,000 2,200,000Unsecured Washington Department of Ecology Loan 13,000,000 13,000,000WWTP Improvements Phase 1 Total241,304 19,660,000 19,901,30421 237WWTP Improvement Phase 2 Unsecured Revenue Bond200,000 200,000Secured Washington Department of Ecology Loan 2,400,000 2,400,000Unsecured Washington Department of Ecology Loan 100,000 100,000WWTP Improvement Phase 2 Total2,700,000 2,700,00021 239Southeast Industrial Trunkline Unsecured Revenue Bond200,000 200,000Southeast Industrial Trunkline Total200,000 200,00021 240Court and Sylvester Sewer Main Improvement Unsecured Revenue Bond1,500,000 1,500,000Court and Sylvester Sewer Main Improvement Total1,500,000 1,500,00021 241Annual Sewer Upsize - Development Transfer from Sewer Fund - Expansion Fees200,000 200,000Annual Sewer Upsize - Development Total200,000 200,00021 242Annual Sewer System Improvements - Development Transfer from Sewer Fund - Expansion Fees200,000 200,000Annual Sewer System Improvements - Development Total200,000 200,00021 263Northwest Area Lift Station Unsecured Revenue Bond00Transfer from Sewer Fund - Expansion Fees 0 500,000 500,000 2021-2022 reduced from 3.2M to 500KNorthwest Area Lift Station Total0 500,000 500,00023 CIP Sewer Total1,555,074 27,701,310 96,000 29,352,38424 CIP PWRF 17 003Columbia East Forcemain and Lift Station Secured United States Economic Development Agency 2,575,000 3,425,000 6,000,000Secured Washington State Department of Commerce 2,870,000 2,870,000Transfer from Sewer Fund 740,745 740,745Columbia East Forcemain and Lift Station Total6,185,745 3,425,000 9,610,7452021-2022 reduced from 5.1M to 3.4M18 070Irrigation Pump Station (IPS) Secured Revenue Bond 547,152 547,152Irrigation Pump Station (IPS) Total547,152 547,15219 055PWRF Pretreatment Improvements Unsecured Revenue Bond 4,139,000 24,641,000 28,780,000Secured Grant 09 Grant Franklin County500,000 500,000Secured Public Works Board Construction Loan 648,523 712,000 1,360,523PWRF Pretreatment Improvements Total4,787,523 25,853,000 30,640,5232021-2022 reduced from 26.6M to 25.8M24 CIP PWRF Total11,520,420 29,278,000 40,798,42025 CIP Strmwater 21 253Sylvester Pipe Relining Transfer from Stromwater Fund330,000 330,000Sylvester Pipe Relining Total330,000 330,00021 2541st Avenue Pipe Rehab Transfer from Stromwater Fund249,000 249,0001st Avenue Pipe Rehab Total249,000 249,00021 255Annual Stormwater System Improvements - Development Transfer from Stromwater Fund200,000 200,000Annual Stormwater System Improvements - Development Total200,000 200,00025 CIP Strmwater Total779,000 779,000Grand Total57,103,521 109,094,413 135,445 166,333,379 Page 96 of 99 2020-2021CITVCOUNCILGOAISUsigCommunityDevelopmentBlockGrant(CD55)andotherpublicandprivatecapitaltorevitaiizeolderneighborhoodsandsaferoutestoessentialservices.Continuingeffortstowarddesigning,siting,programmingneeds,andsiteselectionforacommunitycenterandpursuingacquisitionoflandforfuturecommunitypark.DevelopingPhaseIoftheAStreetSportingComplexandcontinueeffortstoprovideadditionalsoccerandspans?elds.CoordinatingwiththePascoPublicFacilitiesDistricttodevelopapubliceducationcampaign,?nancialanalysisandprepareaballotmeasureconcerningthedevelopmentofaregionalaquaticfacilityforconsiderationbythepeople.Completingconstructionofanewanimalcontrolfacility.Ongoingeffortstoimproveefficiencyandeffectivenessofpublicresourcesinthedeliveryofmunicipalservices,programs,andIong~termmaintenanceandviabilityofpublicfacilities.Collaboratingwiththeinclusion,DiversityandEquityCommissionandcommunityleaderstoenhanceengagementeffortsandorganizationalculturalcompetency.Updatingdesignstandardsforthedevelopmentofnewneighborhoodsandredevelopmenttopromotegreaterneighborhoodcohesionthroughdesignelements,eg.:walkabillty,aesthetics,sustainability,andcommunitygatheringspaces.UpdatingParksandFacilitiesComprehensivePlantoinclude:publicfacilitiesinventory,needsassessment,levelofservice,andcentersevaluation.TeamingwithlocalandregionalpartnerstodevelopaHousingActionPlanwithafocusonstrategiesthatemphasizeaffordablehousing.Regularevaluationofservicesandprogramstocon?rmimportancetocommunity,adequacy,andcost—bene?t.ContinuationofcostofserviceandrecoverytargetsinevaluatingCityservices.Ongoingevaluationofcosts,processesandperformanceassociatedwithdeliveryofCityservicesIncludingcustomerfeedbackandsatisfaction,staffing,facilities,andpartnershipopportunities.instillingandpromotinganorganizationalcultureofcustomerserviceacrossallbusinesslines.Updatingpoliciesrelatingtourbanizationoftheunincorporatedislandstoassureconsistencywithlong~rangeplanning,communitysafety,andfiscalsustainability.Page 97 of 99 2020-1011CITVCOUNCILGOAISlDvelopingaComprehensivePoliceStrategicMasterPlanthroughatransparentprocesstoevaluatefutureservicelevelsofthedertmenttoassuresustainability,publicsafety,andcrimecontroloverthenext5-10years.Collaboratingwithregionalandcommunitypartnerstoevaluateandimplementstrategiestoreducetheincidenceofhomelessness.Leveragingandexpandingpartnershipstomaintainandenhancebehavioralhealthservicestocommunitymembersincrisisbeingassistedbypoliceandfire.Continuingeffortstoimprovepoliceandcommunityrelations.WorkingtoachieveandmaintaintargetfireresponsetimesthroughoperationalImprovementsandlong-rangestrategicplanningoffacilitiesandstaf?ng.Focusingonthelong-terrngoalofsustainingaWashingtonStateRatingBureauClass3communityrating.Leveraginginfrastructuredatabaseofsidewalks,streetllghtsandpavementconditionsalongwithevaluatingpoliciesandmethodstoaddressneedsandinequities.CommencementandcompletionofconstructionoftheLewisStreetOverpassproject,ContinuedemphasisonimprovementsinRoad68/l~182/BurdenBlvd.corridortoimproveoperationandsafety.Data-drivenpro-activeneighborhoodtrafficcalmingefforts.ContinuedcollaborationwithBenFmnklinTransittoenhancemobilityandaccess.CompletionofaTransportationSystemMasterPlanandutilitationofitsrecommendationstodeveloppolicies,regulations,programs,andprojectsthatprovideforgreaterconnectivity,strategicinvestment,mobility,multi-modalsystems,accessibility,efficiencyandsafety.DowntownrevitalizationeffortsofDowntownPascoDevelopmentAuthority(DPDA),post-COVIDrestart,andCityinitiativessuchasDowntownMasterPlanprocessandsigncodemodi?cations.TheconstructionofPeanutsParkandFarmersMarketandcontinuedeffortstopursuestreetscapeandgatewayupgrades.ThecompletionoftheComprehensiveLandUsePlanUpdateandBroadmoorMasterPlanefforts,adoptionofUrbanGrowthAreaexpansionalternative,implementationofadoptedlong-rangeplanningeffortswithappropriateanalysisandadoptionofplanningactionsincluding:zoningcodechanges,phasedsigncodeupdate,anddevelopmentregulationsandstandards.Page 98 of 99 2010-2011CITVCOUNCILGOAL‘IncreasedeffortstopromotethecommunityasadesirableplaceforcommercialandIndustrialdevelopmentbypromotingsmallbusinessoutreachandassistance,predictabilityinprojectreview,andexcellentcustomerservice.PartnershipsandencouragementofDepartmentofNaturalResources(DNR)tofacilitatedevelopmentoftheremainingstate-ownedpropertiesatRoad68/l-182.ContinuedcoordinationwiththePortofPascotocompleteandimplementawaterfrontdoningplanandprovideforpublicinfrastructure.Activepartnershipsintheplanninganddevelopmentofstrategiestopromotetourismanddeploymentofassetstospureconomicactivity.Inconcertwithcommunitypartners,developmentofacomprehensiveeconomicdevelopmentplan.nInuedeffortsofcommunitysurveyingthroughtraProvidingopportunitiesforcommunityengagementthroughboards,commissions,volunteeropportunities,socialmedia,forums,andotheroutlets.Enhancedinter-agencyandconstituentcoordinationdevelopedduringthepandemic.Continuedeffortsofthecommunityidentity/imageenhancementcampaigntoincludepromotionofcommunityandorganizationalsuccesses.Enhancedparticipationandsupportofculturaleventsoccurringwithintheoommunity.SupportoftheArtsandCultureCommissioninpromotingunityandthecelebrationofdiversitythroughartandcultureprograms.Ionameosaneappicauononewecnoogies.Page 99 of 99