Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4033 Resolution - J-U-B Supplement Lewis St OverpassRESOLUTION NO. 4033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND EXECUTE SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 FOR THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH J -U -B ENGINEERS, INC. FOR THE LEWIS STREET OVERPASS PROJECT. WHEREAS, the City and J -U -B Engineers, Inc. entered into a Professional Services Agreement on 2/5/2018 to provide design services with respect to the Lewis Street Overpass Project. WHEREAS, the City and J -U -B Engineers, Inc. executed Supplement No. 1 to the Professional Services Contract No. 30-18-2020 on 1/22/2020 to add right-of-way tasks, a right-of- way sub consultant (Universal Field Services), along with various design revisions; WHEREAS, the City and J -U -B Engineers, Inc. desire to execute Supplement No. 2 to the Professional Services Contract No. 30-18-2020 to add additional design engineering and right-of- way services and bidding support (scope and fee); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: Section 1. That this agreement is amended to allow J -U -B Engineers, Inc. to provide additional design and right-of-way services and bidding support (scope & fee) as described within Exhibit A. Section 2. The City Manager of the City of Pasco, Washington, is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to sign and execute said Supplement on behalf of the City of Pasco. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington this 16a' day of February, 2021. Saul Martinez Mayor ATTEST: 1 � ebra Barham, CMC City Clerk Resolution — PSA Sup. —Lewis St. Overpass Design - 1 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7K `7 Kerr Fe son Law, PIxc City Att A111111111111111111111k � Washington State VI/ Department of Transportation Supplemental Agreement Number 2 Original Agreement Number 30-18-020 Organization and Address J -U -B ENGINEERS, INC. 2810 W. Clearwater Ave., Suite 201 Kennewick, WA 99338 EXHIBITA Phone: (509) 783-2144 Project Number Execution Date Completion Date STPUS-HLP-3530(006) February 5, 2018 December 31, 2021 Project Title New Maximum Amount Payable Lewis Street Overpass $1,623,000.00 Description of Work This supplement costs associated with project delays and design revisions. This supplement includes additional costs for right of way certification, environmental permitting, and extended construction bidding. The total estimated cost of Supplement 2 is $131,700.00 The Local Agency of City of Pasco desires to supplement the agreement entered in to with J -U -B ENGINEERS. INC. and executed on February 5, 2018 _ and identified as Agreement No. JUB No. 30-18-020 All provisions in the basic agreement remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement. The changes to the agreement are described as follows: Section 1, SCOPE OF WORK, is hereby changed to read: See Attached Exhibit A Scope of Work II Section IV, TIME FOR BEGINNING AND COMPLETION, is amended to change the number of calendar days for completion of the work to read: No change III Section V, PAYMENT, shall be amended as follows: Supplement No. 2 total estimated cost is $131,700.00 for a total increased budget of $1,623,000.00, Supplement includes updated WSDOT approved (reduced) overhead rate for J -U -B Engineers. as set forth in the attached Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part of this supplement. If you concur with this supplement and agree to the changes as stated above, please sign in the Appropriate spaces below and return to this office for final action. By: Richard H. or - Project Manager Consultant Signature DOT Form 140-063 Revised 09/2005 0 Approving Authority Signature l NU J-11.8 ENGINEERS, INC. J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Exhibit A Scope of Services, Basis of Fee, and Schedule PROJECT NAME: Lewis Street Overpass CLIENT: City of Pasco J -U -B PROJECT NUMBER: 30-18-020 CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER: 13007 FEDERAL AID NO. STPUS-HLP-3530(006) ATTACHMENT TO: ® SUPPLEMENT NO.2 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES DATED: 12/31/2020 The referenced Agreement for Professional Services executed between J -U -B ENGINEERS, Inc. (J -U -B) and the CLIENT is amended and supplemented to include the following provisions regarding the Scope of Services, Basis of Fee, and/or Schedule: PART 1: PROJECT UNDERSTANDING J -U -B's understanding of this project's history and CLIENT's general intent and scope of the project are described as follows: The original agreement was authorized February 5, 2018 with a scope and budget for 24 months for the design and project administration. The current schedule with bid opening Scheduled for January 28, 2021 adds an additional 12 months of project administration. Supplement No. 1 was prepared December 3, 2019 and executed January 22, 2020 to add right of way tasks, a right-of-way subconsultant (Universal Field Services), along with various design revisions. Supplement No. 1 intended to include specifications updated to 2020 specifications, but costs were left out of the fee total of the supplement version approved. This supplement corrects that omission. BNSF continues to delay project delivery with lack of timely reviews and communication. Last comments received required a significant design change in the decommissioning of the existing Lewis Street underpass. All previous designs submitted to BNSF dating back to 2010 showed the existing underpass to be filled with embankment and top portion with concrete pumped into place. This design approach allowed minimal impact to railroad operations and required no closures or removal of existing tracks. BNSF's new direction will require the removal of the underpass to a minimum depth 6 feet below grade and will require substantial coordination on multiple track closures. Due to the coordination effort anticipated with BNSF, this supplement anticipates the removal will be incorporated by change order to the overpass construction contract or will be addressed in a separate contract after the Lewis Street Overpass structure is complete. PART 2: SCOPE OF SERVICES BY J -U -B J -U -B's Services under this Agreement are limited to the following tasks. Any other items necessary to plan and implement the project, including but not limited to those specifically listed in PART 3, are the responsibility of CLIENT. B. Task 1: Project Administration The following are scope items requiring additional costs: 1. Original agreement was authorized February 5, 2018 with a scope and budget for 24 months of project administration. The current schedule with bid opening Scheduled for January 28, 2021 adds an additional 12 months of project administration. J -U -B Agreement for Professional Services Attachment 1— Soope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 1 2. Additional schedule adds costs due to Cost of Living Adjustments (COLA) which were not included in the original estimated budget. The original fee was negotiated in November 2017. Comparing 2017 direct salary costs to 2020 represents an 8.7% increase without consideration for any 2021 COLA. Since this agreement is a Cost Plus Fixed Fee this represents a natural higher cost for the base scope. 3. The original scope was based on three design submittals for AGENCY review at 30%, 60%, 90%. The 100% Ad Ready assumed minor revisions from 90%. Conceptual Design Presented to City June 18, 2018 Based on this meeting the following decisions were made: • Eliminate reconstruction of Clark Street from the project. • Include the 1 st Avenue Overpass as scoped. • Based on Traffic Memo (Included in Supplement No. 1) design the bridge section for two lanes instead of original design of 4 lanes. Include bike lanes, sidewalks with one side wider for multi -use. Refine the bridge section as to not require additional pier widening in future. Future expandability to three lanes. • Decorative facing on retaining walls. • Present project concepts and recommendations to Council June 25, 2018. 30% Submittal to City July 23, 2018 • Comments received August 24, 2018 • City requested J -U -B to evaluate cost options between tiered SEW walls versus single walls with embankment slopes. J -U -B revised the design to the single SEW wall concept and incorporated into 60% submittal. 60% Submittal to City December 7, 2018 • Comments received December 26, 2018 • January 15, 2019 received City comments on 60% Structural Plans. The City requested the following design revisions between the 60% and 90% submittal: • Revise the roadway section surfacing and pavement depths. The original design was based on the original geotechnical pavement section recommendations. J -U -B coordinated with the geotechnical engineer to determine the adequacy of the requested design pavement section. With the reduced traffic projections, the City provided pavement section was determined to be adequate. J -U -B revised the plans, roadway sections, and quantities. • City requested the storm pond in the NE corner of Lewis Street and 1 st Avenue to be replaced with an underground infiltration gallery. At the City's request, J -U -B evaluated an alternative design to replace the storm pond designed for the NE Corner of Lewis Street/2nd Avenue. The design calculations were updated to include this infiltration gallery and included in a Memorandum submitted to the City on March 14, 2018. On March 29, 2019, the City directed J -U -B to revise the design for the 90% submittal. • Revise project limits on 2nd Avenue to eliminate 250 feet of reconstruction for construction cost saving. 60% Submittal to BNSF December 18, 2018 J -U -B prepared a 60% submittal for BNSF consisting of select plan sheets showing portions that BNSF was interested in reviewing. This was done at the suggestion of the railroad to aid the review process. The review set included all the structural plans J -U -B Agreement for Professional Services Attachment 1— Scope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 2 for the Lewis Street Overpass and some of the roadway and utilities plans including the existing underpass work. • Comments received July 9, 2019 Additional scope items resulting from BNSF's review included: • Research into the previous submittal of the original 2010 design. BNSF had questions about the previous direction provided by BNSF staff for the future track layouts and clearances that the design was based on. • The City requested assistance in locating documentation of the original C&M agreement and correspondence. The City's previous railroad consultant was not available and/or not unable to provide this information. J -U -B researched our archives and was able to provide the City a copy of the agreement and exhibits and copies of correspondence that was provided at the time to J -U -B. • BNSF turnover of personnel lead to different concerns than the original reviewers. A new concern was a line of site. J -U -B developed exhibits evaluating line of site with the proposed pier locations and track signals located at switches. • Recreating clearance documentation. We were able to locate the original survey of the tracks which included the top of rail. The plans were edited to include the vertical clearances and horizontal clearances from the face of piers. 90% Submittal to City April 1, 2019 • Received City comments between April 10, 2019 and April 19, 2019 • Additional topographic survey to reflect the as -built conditions of the Oregon Avenue project. Updated the design to reflect this. • At the City's direction J -U -B continued with the progress of design and plan development even though BNSF comments had not been received. The City requested the following scope revisions between the 90% and 100% submittal: • Right of Way appraisals and acquisition services. J -U -B added subconsultant Universal Field Services to provide appraisal services and assistance to right of way certification. As requested, the scope increased to include right of way plan development and legal descriptions. • KPG May 2019 additional costs KPG - Decorative fence (barrier) coordination with KPG and final design. 100% Submittal to City June 14, 2019 Constructability Review provided by WSP August 19, 2019 The following was additional scope items added after the 100% Submittal: • June 26, 2019 Preliminary Right of Way Plans submitted to WSDOT • July 2019 Noise Report as required by WSDOT to supplement the original work done by other Consultants. • July — August 2019 Practical Solutions Documentation as required by WSDOT for Connecting Washington Funding. • Railroad Easements legal descriptions and exhibits • Temporary Construction Easement for Oregon Street Group (Supplement No. 1) • Plaza design and removal from contract (Supplement No. 1) J -U -B Agreement for Professional Services Attachment 1— Scope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 3 • Bridge Plan Review Documentation requested by BNSF • July 1, 2019 Incorporated WSDOT comments and finalized and signed Right of Way Plan • September 24, 2019 City directed J -U -B to have bid ready documents for October 18, 2019 for December 2, 2019 Advertisement. • Easement concurrence with BNSF required revisions to Right of Way plan for utility waterline easement. • Updated Railroad provided costs and assisted with funding budget. • October 17, 2019 submitted final Right of Way documents and plans. • October 22, 2019 submitted final plans • October 28, 2019 received a draft overpass agreement to incorporate into the final specifications. • Developed a construction schedule for estimating railroad cost and bridge construction phasing. • October and early November coordination on Railroad costs and incorporating into final estimate. November 5, 2019 submitted final cost estimate. • November 7, 2019 received additional BNSF Comments on 60% Design • November 14, 2019 administrative offer for BNSF submitted to City for approval. • December and January 2020 mostly right of way coordination. • February 2020 at the City request J -U -B explored Tri City Airport as a borrow site for earthwork. • April 4, 2020 Right of Way Certification 2 submitted by the City, J -U -B revised ROW plans to match. • July 23, 2020 additional BNSF comments received. • July 28, 2020 Submitted ROW package to WSDOT for Cert. 3 • August 31, 2020 City requested revisions to contingencies, and costs for the Engineer Estimate to align with funding obligation. • September 11, 2020 received additional BNSF review comments requiring design revisions. November 2020 Final Ad Submittal The shelved plans were reworked to update one year's worth of minor design revisions and two additional contract specification updates ready for a November 6, 2020 advertisement. The City delayed a week for a November 13, 2020 advertisement. The additional submittal being one year later than planned required an additional quality control reviews. At the request of the City, we reduced the actual hours of our Senior Level Structural Manager QC reviews by half due to perceived inefficiencies. The excess hours are largely due to staff availability one year after the planned assignments. 4. Original Agreement assumed AGENCY to provide a single set of review comments within 3 weeks of submittal. Additional time was required to review comments. 5. The frequency of project meetings increased to weekly for a period after City staffing changes. This was useful in moving the project ahead but did add additional time charged to the project. COVID required all meetings to be via Zoom and some work has been done remotely to meet J -U -B Agreement for Professional Services Attachment 1— Scope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 4 COVID guidelines. 6. Communicate and coordinate subconsultant activities under J -U -B, as necessary. 7. Regularly monitor project status, budget and schedule. 8. Provide ongoing document handling and filing. C. Task 2: Data Collection — No Additional Scope D. Task 3: BNSF Coordination The following are scope items requiring additional costs: Extensive elapsed time between submittals and receipt of BNSF comments required addityinal time to research previous submittals for each round of comments and responses. Changes in reviewers and time sequence lead to confusion on previously provided information versus new issues to address. For example: we received BNSF comments only to determine some of their review comments were repeats of previous reviews that were already resolved. BNSF apparently did not use the updated plans submitted for subsequent reviews. Providing quick responses to BNSF was and continues to be a highest priority to the City and Consultant team, even at cost in efficiency in readdressing previous comments along with new issues. 2. Original Scope and Fee was based on two submittals to BNSF Railway assuming responsive timely comments. Because comments were not received by BNSF within the same submittal schedule reviews, additional submittals and design updates were required. First submittal was the 60% BNSF Preliminary Design Submittal December 18, 2018. The City received BNSF review comments July 8, 2019. J -U -B provided design revisions and updated plans to respond to the 60% plan review. The submittal back to the railroad was August 13, 2019. This additional update was months after the 90% plan submittal to the City on April 1, 2019. Second submittal was the 100% plans and specifications submitted back to BNSF November 12, 2019. We received BNSF comments September 11, 2020. 3. BNSF requiring the underpass to be demolished to a minimum of 6 feet below grade required design revisions impacting utilities, especially the waterline. 4. Note: The future lowering of the underpass is not included in this supplement. It is anticipated that either a change order or a separate project will provide the BNSF requirement to demolish the existing underpass to 6 feet below grade. Design changes were made in the final plans to accommodate this requirement and avoid conflicts. At the time of bid, the final CSM agreement was not yet authorized. Additional coordination with BNSF will be required during construction to determine the acceptable approach to train interruptions and acceptable construction methods. E. Task 4: Preliminary Design — No Additional Scope F. Task 5: Final Design The following are scope items requiring additional costs: 1. Utility coordination increased in scope. The original scope assumed coordination consisting of updating the utility changes from the 2010 design by contacting utilities and verifying any updated improvements not assuming relocation would significantly change. The original design utility coordination included the following: • September 13, 2010 J -U -B met with Mike McShane of the City. Our direction was not to include or plan for any additional utilities through the existing underpass. Any utilities requesting conduits would need to provide separate from this project. No utilities requested conduits. J -U -B Agreement for Professional Services Attachment 1— Scope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 5 • March 23, 2011 J -U -B sent 70% Plans to all utilities for review and comment. No responses were received. • March 25, 2011 J -U -B Utility coordinator Jim Crowder met with Franklin PUD to discuss project power supply needs and location for illumination system. • April 21, 2011, we received comments on the power supply location that FPUD would provide. Utility Coordination (excluding City utilities) after scoping the redesign of Lewis Street Overpass included: • February 15, 2019 Submitted Review Set to Utilities • March 2, 2019 KPG coordinated with Franklin County PUD power supply needs • May 23, 2019 Utility Meeting at JUB Office. Presented the new redesign without the couplet to utilities in attendance. • July 2, 2019 CAD drawing requested by FPUD to layout their relocation plan. • December 19, 2019 J -U -B submitted BNSF Application for Pipeline or Wire Line — Crossing to Jones Lang LaSalle. Note no utilities other than the City waterline were proposed. Nine 4 -inch conduits were shown for "future utilities". • January 14, 2020 Utility Meeting at J -U -B. Franklin • April 30, 2020 Utility Zoom Meeting • May 6, 2020 Zoom Meeting — FPUD change from nine 4 -inch conduits to three 6 inch. BNSF utility application showed nine 4 -inch. The BNSF application will not be approved prior to the C&M agreement. Revision to utility application to follow. • May 21, 2020 Follow up Zoom Meeting with FPUD on revisions to plans. • May 29, 2020 Utility Zoom Meeting — FPUD provided conduit layout sheet. FPUD Engineer will not be available for a month and another Engineer will follow up of deign relocation. • June 11, 2020 Utility Zoom Meeting 2. Waterline adjustments required lowering the profile through the underpass to avoid conflicts with the demolition of the top 6 feet of the structure. 3. Opinion of Probable Costs quantity revisions resulting from utility items, BNSF underpass demolition, and 2020 specifications requirements, required multiple versions of updated final costs. Coordination with the City to include appropriate contingencies and consistency with funding requirements were also reasons for multiple additional updates. 4. The base agreement assumed one update to the original contract documents to 2018 specifications. This was accomplished with the 60% and 90% submittal the original scope. The project delay required the specifications to be updated again to meet the 2020 Standard Specifications. Supplement No. 1 addressed the anticipated scope for this update but did not include additional cost in the supplement. At the time of scoping Supplement No.1 it was not known that WSDOT would change their process of quarterly updates for a real time updates meaning updates are made anytime and therefore specifications cannot be valid for an extended period of time prior to bid. Because of this, Amendments were eliminated from 2020 updates. With the continued delay, WSDOT reviewed the PS&E twice requiring an additional update. With the delays continuing, coordination with Local Programs allowed a hold date that would be acceptable for specification updates and revert to the training and UDBE goals previously determined. 5. September 17, 2020 The City directed J -U -B to make design changes to incorporate BNSF's requirement for the underpass demolition. This request evaluating and revising construction phasing, additional details sheets to the Underpass Sheets, revise elevations, revise waterline design, and other items impacted by this decision. Design included research into the original underpass plans in determining the cutoff elevation and additional costs. Plans, specifications J -U -B Agreement for Professional Services Attachment 1— Scope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 6 and costs were revised. All disciplines evaluated potential impacts and several meeting specific to this change were added. 6. Additional costs for extended bidding process to answer Contractor questions and assist the City with addendums. Current estimate is 11 weeks of bidding compared to 4 weeks assumed in costs. Actual hours are included in this Supplement with an additional three weeks projected. The negotiated estimated hours for this task was 68 for a 4 -week advertisement compared to estimated 139 hours for 11 -week advertisement. G. Task 6: Structures 1. Additional costs related to the design of the stairs over and above the Supplement No. 1 estimated scope. Supplement No. 1 did not include the additional SEW walls required for the stairs. 2. Additional updates in quantities and costs resulting from additional submittals and reviews. Revise costs to account for updated construction cost. 3. Additional senior level structural reviews of added submittals. H. Task 7: Urban Design, Lighting, Landscaping (KPG) 1. Estimated costs for providing bidding assistance which was not included in KPG's original scope. An estimated fee is included in the Consultant Cost Fee Determination based on invoices to date and anticipated level of effort. KPG also provided additional specification assistance. I. Task 8: Geotechnical Investigation (GPI) - No Additional Scope J. Task 9: NEPA Update (Widener) 1. Estimated costs for additional BNSF coordination is included in the Consultant Cost Fee Determination Exhibit. K. Task 10: Funding — No Additional Scope L. Task 11: Right of Way (UFS) 1. Estimated costs for research, preparation, and coordination with WSDOT Real Estate Services for the right of way certification documentation is included in the Consultant Cost Fee Determination Exhibit. This additional cost is still below the original $50,000 estimated budget. PART 3: CLIENT -PROVIDED WORK AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES M. CLIENT -Provided Work -CLIENT is responsible for completing, or authorizing others to complete, all tasks not specifically included above in PART 2 that may be required for the project including, but not limited to: 1. Construction Management 2. Testing of Materials 3. Construction Surveying or Staking N. Additional Services - CLIENT reserves the right to add future tasks for subsequent phases or related work to the scope of services upon mutual agreement of scope, additional fees, and schedule. These future tasks to be added by amendment at a later date as Additional Services, may include: 1. Design and preparation of a separate contract for removing the existing Lewis Street underpass as required by BNSF. 2. Engineering assistance beyond bidding assistance. 3. Engineering Support during Construction and Record Drawings. J -U -B Agreement for Professional Services Attachment 1 — Scope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 7 PART 4: BASIS OF FEE AND SCHEDULE OF SERVICES A. CLIENT shall pay J -U -B for the identified Services in PART 2 as follows: 1. For Cost Plus Fixed Fees: • Client shall pay J -U -B an amount equal to the cumulative hours charged to the Project by each class of J -U -B's personnel times their hourly salary rate times J -U -B's audited overhead multiplier for all services performed on the Project. • Client shall pay J -U -B a lump sum fixed fee based on 30% of the Direct Costs. • Client shall pay J -U -B for Reimbursable Expenses (no multiplier per WSDOT/LAG). • Client shall pay J -U -B for J -U -B's Consultants' charges (no multiplier per WSDOT LAG) 2. J -U -B may alter the distribution of compensation between individual tasks to be consistent with services rendered while not exceeding the total project amount. B. Period of Service: If the period of service for the task identified above is extended beyond 12 months, the compensation amount for J -U -B's services may be appropriately adjusted to account for salary adjustments and extended duration of project management and administrative services. C. CLIENT acknowledges that J -U -B will not be responsible for impacts to the schedule by actions of others over which J -U -B has no control. D. The following table summarizes the fees and anticipated schedule for the services identified in PART Task Number Task Name Fee Type (Rounded) Amount Anticipated Schedule 1 Project Management Cost Plus Fixed $25,900 Concurrent with work progress Fee (T&M Cost portion) 3 BNSF Coordination Cost Plus Fixed $7,000 Concurrent with work progress Fee (T&M Cost portion) 5 Final Design Cost Plus Fixed $59,000 Concurrent with work progress Fee (T&M Cost portion) 6 Structures Cost Plus Fixed $13,000 Concurrent with work progress Fee (T&M Cost portion) 7,9 & 11 Subconsultants for BNSF See Consultant $15,000 Concurrent with work progress Coordination and ROW Fee Determination Certification & Urban Design Expenses Estimated See $0 As required Consultant Fee Determination Fixed Fee Cost Plus Fixed $11,800 n/a Fee (Lump Sum Fixed Feeportion) Total: $131,700 Rounded $100 J -U -B Agreement for Professional Services Attachment 1— Scope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 8 NOTE on Coronavirus and Schedule: J -U -B is committed to meeting yourproject schedule commitments as delineated above. As our response to the COVID-19 pandemic, J -U -B is engaging in safety procedures in help to protect clients, staff, their families, and the public. Our staff or offices may be subject to quarantine or other interruptions. Since COVID-19 impacts are beyond J -U -B's control, we are not responsible for the force majeure impacts to delivery timelines, or subsequent project delays and related claims, costs, or damages. Should circumstances related to the COVID-19 issue arise with J -U -B staff or in a J -U -B office that will impact our delivery schedule, we will notify you of the circumstances and mutually agree to a schedule adjustment. E. The above fees were developed from the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Exhibit and Exhibit D Consultant Fee Determination -Summary Sheet. For interna/ J -U -B use only. PROJECT LOCATION (STATE): Washington TYPE OF WORK: Cjt R&D: No GROUP: Transportation PROJECT DESCRIPTION(S): 1. Bridge (B02) 2. Highway/Interstate/Roadway (H07 J -U -B Agreement for Professional services Attachment 1— Scope of Services, Schedule, and Basis of Fee Page 9 Lewis Street Overpass 1/11/2021 Summary of Payments Supplement No. 2 W/O Construction Basic Agreement Basic Agreement with Adjustment Supplement 1 Supplement 2 Total Direct Salary $308,504.37 $301,767.71 $18,911.61 $39,312.12 $359,991.44 Overhead $586,027.86 $573,231.05 $32,930.45 $65,622.83 $671,784.33 * Direct Non -Salary $399,226.27 $399,226.27 $69,031.45 $15,000.00 $483,257.72 ** Adjustment ($21,554.47) Fixed Fee $92,551.31 $90,530.31 $5,673.48 $11,793.64 $107,997.43 Total $1,364,755.34 $1,364,755.34 $126,546.99 $131,728.59 $1,623,030.92 Rounded $1,364,800.00 $1,364,800.00 $126,500.00 $131,700.00 $1,623,000.00 * Direct Non -Salary Costs Direct Expenses $2,147.60 $2,147.60 $570.45 $0.00 $2,718.05 Subconsultants $397,078.67 $397,078.67 $68,461.00 $15,000.00 $480,539.67 Direct Non -Salary $399,226.27 $399,226.27 $69,031.45 $15,000.00 $483,257.72 ** Base Agreement Credit from 2010 Scope ESTIMATED WBS EXHIBIT Lewis Street Overpass - Supplement No. 2 CLIENT: City of Pasco DATE: January 11, 2021 Section: 2nd Avenue to Oregon Avenue Principal In- Lead Project Project Structural Structural Roadway/Structural Charge Project Manager Engineer Engineer Manager/QC Engineer Design Engineer Designer/CADD Clerical PROJECT TASK Hours TASK 1 I PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 1 0.0 74.0 6.0 9.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 1.1 Project Management 0.0 34.0 0.0 4.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 1.2 QC Submittals and Reviews 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 Project Meetings 0.0 22.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 Stakeholder involvement 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Public Open House 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 TASK 2 1 DATA COLLECTION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 Utility Coordination Request Locates 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 Topographic Surveys 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.3 Update Base Map 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TASK 3 JBNSF RAILWAY COORDINATION 2020 Only) 0.0 24.0 7.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 Design Submittals 0.0 24.0 7.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 M8A Agreement 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 BNSF Easements 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TASK 4 30% PRELIMINARY DESIGN 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TASK 5 1 FINAL DESIGN 2020 only) 0.0 137.0 60.5 57.0 23.5 0.0 54.0 70.0 0.0 5.1 Roadway Design 0.0 0.0 2.5 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.5 0.0 5.2 Drainage Design Revisions 0.0 8.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 5.3 Utility Coordination & Design Revisions 0.0 13.5 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.5 2.5 0.0 5.4 Traffic Control Plans 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 Roadway Design Revisions 0.0 8.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0.0 5.6 Opinion of Probable Cost Estimate 0.0 10.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.7 Specifications - Update Specifications 0.0 38.5 3.0 21.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 Bid Assistance(January 28,2021 0.0 59.0 8.0 30.5 17.0 0.0 7.5 16.5 0.0 TASK 6A STRUCTURES LEWIS STREET REDESIGN 2020 Only)0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 67.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 Situation and Layout (SIkL) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 Superstructure Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 Substructure Design 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 Bridge Summary Sheets 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TASK 7 1 URBAN DESIGN LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING G TASK 8GEO C NICA INVESTIGATION GPI TASK 9 NEP / BNSF(WIDENER) TASK 10 IFLINDING 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 Funding Support 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TASK 11 Right of Way (Included in Supplement No. 1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 ROW Coordination 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 Plans, Exhibits, Legal Descriptions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.31 RIGHT OF WAY UFS TOTAL 0.0 235.0 73.5 75.5 140.5 22.0 54.0 70.0 14.0 Exhibit D Consultant Fee Determination - Summary Sheet Cost Plus Fixed Fee Project: Lewis Street Overpass Supplement No. 2 -With Out Construction Support nirPrt Salary rnct inSr1, File: City of Pasco - Lewis Street Overpass Supplement No. 2 - WO Const 1-6-21 PE Fees Exhibit D 2020 Classification Man -Hours Rates of Pay Costs Project Manager 235.0 $72.01 $16,922.35 Lead Project Engineer 73.5 $54.32 $3,992.52 Project Engineer 75.5 $54.24 $4,095.12 Structural Manager/QC 140.5 $60.82 $8,545.21 Structural Engineer 22.0 $35.77 $786.94 Design Engineer 54.0 $30.32 $1,637.28 Roadway/Structural Designer/CADD 70.0 $39.85 $2,789.50 Clerical 14.0 $38.80 $543.20 684.5 Total DSC = $39,312.12 Overhead (OH Cost - including Salary Additives): Updated 2018 OH Rate x DSC of 166.93% $65,622.83 Fixed Fee Fixed Fee 30.00% _ $11,793.64 Total DSC, OH & Profit $116,728.59 Reimbursables: Travel and Per Diem Per Diem 0 days @ $41.00 $0.00 Air Travel 0 trips @ $800.00 $0.00 Mileage 0 miles C $0.535 $0.00 Lodging 0 nights $100.00 $0.00 Title Report 0 each $380.10 $0.00 Survey Equipment GPS 0.0 hours $20.45 $0.00 Reimbursable Sub -Total $0.00 Subconsultant Costs: Total UFS $5,000.00 KPG $5,000.00 Widener $5,000.00 Subconsultant Costs $15,000.00 Total $131,728.59 Total Rounded $100 $131 700.00 Mana ement Reserve 0% $0.00 Grand Total $131,700.00 Prepared by: Rick Door Date: 1/11/2021 File: City of Pasco - Lewis Street Overpass Supplement No. 2 - WO Const 1-6-21 PE Fees Exhibit D EXHIBIT F WSDOT Breakdown of Overhead Cost Year Ending December 31, 2019 FRINGE BENEFITS Direct Labor Beginning Total 17,947,482 % of Direct Labor FICA 2,323,619 12.95% Unemployment 96,553 0.54% Medical Aid and Industrial Insurance 68,022 0.38% Company Insurance and Medical 2,976,737 16.59% Vacation, Holiday, and Sick Leave 3,750,727 20.90% Commission, Bonuses/Pension Plan 3,461,495 19.29% Total Fringe Benefits 12,677,153 70.63% GENERAL OVERRAD State B &0 Taxes 297,497 1.66% Insurance 529,826 2.95% Administration and Time Not Assignable 10,129,547 56.44% Printing, Stationery, and Supplies 574,157 3.20% Professional Services 326,308 1.82% Travel Not Assignable 1,198,385 6.68% Telephone and Telegraph Not Assignable 306,860 1.71% Fees, Dues, Professional Meetings 157,022 0.87% Utilities and Maintenance 348,909 1.94% Professional Development 192,728 1.07% Rent 1,170,561 6.52% Equipment Support ; Depreciation 8t Computer expense 1,867,654 10.41% Cost of money 161,438 0.90% Office Miscellaneous, Postage 21,280 0.12% Total General Overhead 17,282,172 96.29% I.Total Overhead Fringe + General 29,959,325 166.93%