Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOneza & Associates - 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update Amendment 1CITY OF PASCO AGREEMENT WITH Oneza and Associates AMENDMENT NO.1 I. RECITALS This is an amendment to the professional services agreement related to City of Pasco 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update between the contracting parties, the City of Pasco, Washington (hereinafter "City") and Oneza and Associates (hereinafter the "Consultant") There is now in full force and effect between the parties an Agreement, Executed by the City on October , 2018. The parties to this contract desire to modify said Agreement as follows; II. AGREEMENTS 1. The Consultant shall provide services described in the attached scope of work for additional EIS environmental support and is made part of this Agreement. Fees for these services shall be as stated in section 4. estimated costs of the scope of work for additional EIS environmental support attachment. 2. It is understood and agreed that all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall be and remain the same. 111. SIGNATURES CITY: Oneza and Associates: By: By:�' Title: Dave Zabel], City Manager Date: Page 1 of 1 Title: Ferdouse Oneza, AICP, Principal Date: -I.TTACHMENT 1 V__OPE OF WORK rz,IVP Pl,. Tt i�pdalt: Vv aier,�Se��L+;r r Planning Support This Scope of Services is for professional services between Murraysmith, Inc. and Oneza & Associates (Oneza). The intent of this work is to assist Oneza in the development of water and sewer infrastructure requirements to serve the proposed Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundary expansion. This includes both evaluating the capacity of the City's existing water and sewer infrastructure to serve this new area as well as assessing the additional required infrastructure. Murraysmith will support Oneza in identifying and confirming future infrastructure needs to accommodate the proposed future growth and provide planning level cost estimates. i kp" Und Murraysmith completed a Comprehensive Water System Plan (CWSP) Update for the City in 2018 and a Comprehensive Sewer Plan (CSP) Update for the City in 2014. The UGA impact analysis being performed by Oneza will address the City's proposed UGA expansion of 4800 acres. Murraysmith will review potential surplus capacity in the City's existing water system facilities and infrastructure based on the analysis in the CWSP to serve the 20 -year demands of the existing UGA. The surplus capacity will be compared to the proposed 20 -year demand for the UGA expansion. A conceptual layout of pressure zone boundaries, transmission piping, and any associated facilities will be developed within the UGA expansion area. New infrastructure and/or reasonable improvements to existing infrastructure, will be identified to extend service from the existing service area to supply the 20 -year projections for the UGA expansion area. Where applicable, Murraysmith will review the projects listed in the CWSP to determine potential overlap with the infrastructure requirements to serve the UGA expansion area. Planning level costs will be developed for any proposed infrastructure using ENR scaled unit costs developed during the CWSP. City of Pasco, WA Murraysmith, Inc. City of Pasco —Water/Sewer Planning Support October 2018 1 of 6 Pressure zone boundaries will be developed for the UGA expansion area based on available contour data at approximately 70 foot intervals. Boundaries will be aligned with existing City pressure zones where feasible. Oneza will provide spatially allocated 20 -year population projections for the UGA expansion area. Murraysmith will use the per capita demand and peaking factor assumptions from the CWSP to allocate residential water demands in the expansion area by pressure zone. Any specific non- residential demands for the area, including industrial, commercial, and public facilities (i.e. schools), etc. will be provided by Oneza Fire flow requirements for the UGA expansion will be based on the land use requirements identified in the CWSP. Building or structure -specific fire flows will not be evaluated. The zone boundary and demand projections will be used to determine the supply, storage, and pumping requirements to serve the UGA expansion. The surplus capacity from the 20 -year CWSP analysis for any applicable infrastructure will be evaluated to serve the UGA expansion. Where the existing infrastructure is inadequate, new infrastructure and/or improvements to existing facilities will be recommended using the design criteria in the CWSP Transmission piping to serve the UGA will be added to the hydraulic model along with any facility improvements from the pumping, storage and supply analysis. The demand will be allocated, and pipe sizing will be verified using the model under the 2036 MDD, fire flow, and PHD scenarios. Planning level costs for each recommended improvement will be developed. Unit costs from the CWSP will be scaled using the ENR factors. New unit costs will not be developed. Capacity improvements to the Water Treatment Plant (WTP) will be on a unit cost basis with no analysis of the WTP processes to increase capacity One review meeting with City staff will be conducted following the identification of improvements to get City input and buyoff on the proposed improvements. One iteration is assumed for updates based on City comments. If significant modifications are requested by City staff, this will be considered additional work outside the scope of this contract. City of Pasco, WA Murraysmith, Inc. City of Pasco— Water/Sewer Planning Support October 2018 2 of 6 ■ Oneza or the City will provide contours or equivalent elevation information for the UGA expansion area. ■ 20 -year population growth for the UGA expansion area will be provided by Oneza including the spatial location for the allocation of updated future demand projections. ■ Demand projections for the UGA expansion population will be based on the per capita future demand and peaking factors from the CWSP. For any specific non-residential demand beyond the population based projections, Oneza will provide locations and quantities. ■ Demand for the existing UGA will not be updated. The 2036 MDD allocation in the hydraulic model from the CWSP will be used to evaluate existing infrastructure. Murraysmith will utilize the existing 2036 model without modification except for the additional UGA expansion projections provided by Oneza. • Excess capacity in existing infrastructure will be utilized to serve the UGA expansion area where feasible. ■ Murraysmith will utilize the design standards developed for the 2018 CWSP in the analysis. ■ Operation and maintenance costs will not be addressed. ■ Phasing plans will not be developed. ■ The hydraulic model calibration is assumed to be adequate, and additional calibration will not be performed. =e o k 3 A I Nearly all of the UGA expansion area will be assumed to flow to the west of the existing system. Although the CSP indicated that the West Pasco Trunk and 9th & Washington Lift Station have limited or no capacity to serve the existing UGA 2031 flows, Murraysmith will review the capacity in this existing infrastructure under 20 -year flow conditions to determine any reserve capacity. Any surplus capacity will be compared to the proposed 20 -year flows for the UGA expansion. For the small UGA expansion area east of Railroad Avenue, the capacity in the Industrial Way piping will be analyzed to convey the flows from this portion of the expansion area. A conceptual layout of basin boundaries, trunk line piping, and any associated lift station facilities will be developed within the UGA expansion area. New infrastructure, or reasonable improvements to existing infrastructure, will be identified to convey flows through the existing service area. Where applicable, Murraysmith will review the projects listed in the CSP to determine where they overlap with the infrastructure requirements to serve the UGA expansion area. Planning level costs will be developed for any proposed infrastructure using ENR scaled unit costs developed during the CSP. City of Pasco, WA Murraysmith, Inc. City of Pasco — Water/Sewer Planning Support October 2018 3 of 6 Sewer basin boundaries will bed eveloped for the UGA expansion area based on available elevation data. Gravity sewer will be assumed where possible at a conceptual level. Oneza will provide spatially allocated 20 -year population projections for the UGA expansion area. Murraysmith will use the per capita average dry weather flow loading assumptions from the CSP and DOE design population -based peaking factors to allocate loading in the expansion area by basin. It is assumed that significant non-residential loading (i.e. food processing discharge in the area east of Railroad Avenue) will be directed to the reuse facility and not through the sewer collection system. It is also assumed that any specific non-residential flows for the area, including other industrial, commercial, public facilities (i.e. schools), etc. will be conveyed through the collection system, and these estimated flows will be provided by Oneza. For basins requiring lift stations, the lift station pump capacity and force main size will be determined. The CSP analysis indicated the 9t" & Washington Lift Station had limited or no capacity to serve 2031 flows. As a result, a new parallel lift station will be assumed and sized to convey just the UGA expansion area flows. New infrastructure and improvements to existing facilities will be recommended using the design criteria in the CSP. Trunk line piping to serve the UGA expansion will be added to the hydraulic model along with any facility improvements from the pumping analysis. The flows will be allocated, and pipe sizing will be verified. Costs for each recommended improvement will be developed. Unit costs from the CSP will be scaled using the ENR factors. No new unit costs will be developed. One review meeting with City staff will be conducted following the identification of improvements to get City input and agreement on the proposed improvements. One iteration is assumed for updates based on City comments. if significant modifications are requested by City staff, this will be considered additional work outside the scope of this contract. City of Pasco, WA Murraysmith, Inc. City of Pasco — Water/Sewer Planning Support October 2018 4 of 6 ■ Oneza or the City will provide contours or equivalent elevation information for the UGA expansion area. ■ 20 -year population growth for the UGA expansion area will be provided by Oneza including the spatial location for the allocation of updated future flow projections. ■ Sewer flow projections for the UGA expansion population will be based on the per capita future flow from the CWSP and DOE design peaking factors. For any specific non-residential flows beyond the population -based projections, Oneza will provide locations and quantities. ■ Sewer flows for the existing UGA will not be updated. The 2031 dry weather and wet weather flow allocation and piping in the hydraulic model from the CSP will be used to evaluate existing infrastructure. Murraysmith will utilize the existing 2031 model without modification except for the additional UGA expansion projections provided by Oneza. Murraysmith will utilize the design standards developed for the 2014 CSP in the analysis. ■ Oneza will provide any specific non-residential flows for the UGA expansion area, including other industrial, commercial, public facilities (i.e. schools), etc. that are to be conveyed through the collection system, ■ Excess capacity in existing infrastructure will be utilized to serve the UGA expansion area where feasible. ■ Murraysmith will utilize the design standards developed for the 2014 CSP in the analysis. ■ Evaluation of wastewater treatment plant capacity and performance is currently being performed by Murraysmith under a separate contract. Therefore, specific process or capacity improvements to the wastewater treatment plant will not be evaluated as part of this project. ■ The 2014 CSP identified future capacity limitations in the existing West Pasco Trunk alignment, which is the logical route for discharge from the northwest UGA expansion area The capacity limitations are more probable based on the growth experienced in the City since completion of the 2014 CSP, and it is assumed that the West Pasco Trunk has limited or no capacity to serve the UGA expansion area. As a result, it is assumed that sewer flow from the UGA expansion area will be conveyed through a new trunk line parallel to the West Pasco Trunk. ■ The hydraulic model calibration is assumed to be adequate, and additional calibration will not be performed. ■ Operation and maintenance costs will not be addressed. City of Pasco, WA Murraysmith, Inc. City of Pasco — Water/Sewer Planning Support October 2018 5 of 6 ■ Phasing plans will not be developed. ■ A summary of the assumptions, conclusions and recommendations for potable water and sewer infrastructure to serve the expanded UGA will be provided in a draft and final technical memorandum. Murraysmith's effort will begin once complete population growth and non-residential water demand and sewer flows are provided. Once these data are provided, the initial draft technical memorandum will be completed within 2.5 months, with the final technical memorandum completed within 2 weeks of receipt of comments on the draft report. Murraysmith's estimated fee to perform the work identified in this scope of work is $40,000, to be billed on a not -to -exceed, time -and -materials basis. City of Pasco, WA Murraysmith, Inc. City of Pasco — Water/Sewer Planning Support October 2018 6 of 6 Scope of Work Amendment 1 City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan Update Additional EIS Environmental Support 1. Project Understanding The City has hired Oneza & Associates to assist with updating its Comprehensive Plan consistent with Washington state requirements. White Bluffs Consulting is assisting with public involvement and environmental elements, as part of the consultant team. J -U -B Engineers is assisting with updating and evaluating the Capital Facilities and Transportation Elements of the Comprehensive Plan. Murraysmith is assisting with water and sewer infrastructure capacity, requirements and cost estimate for future growth. The City of Pasco has determined this proposal could potentially have a significant adverse impact on the environment or have increased public scrutiny, and accordingly it has been determined that a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required. The consultant team will prepare a non -project programmatic EIS. The following includes scope and estimated budget for developing the SEPA EIS and additional work to update the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, this scope includes preparing the environmental and additional analyses. The following support activities are expected to be required for this effort: • Additional meetings, including additional City staff, City Commissions, County Commissions and Public Meetings. Budget for this support will be added to task 8 in the original scope of work • SEPA EIS Environmental Analysis and Response to Comments. Budget for this support will be added to Task 6 in the original scope of work • Changes to land use development patterns in the proposed UGA area including commercial, transportation corridors, parks and public lands, and any associated UGA total area updates to support these uses • Development of one new alternative land use scenario, in addition to revising the currently proposed land use scenario and, and preparing existing information for one no -action scenario • More detailed capital improvements analysis, including evaluation of state owned transportation facilities with emphasis on the impacts of the UGA area and comparison of alternatives. • Utilize City provided GIS data to develop a more detailed land capacity analysis • Project Management and coordination with the City It is expected that the timing for completion of these tasks will extend the overall project schedule by three to six months. A more specific project schedule will be provided. Oneza & Associates Page I of 5 City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan Update 2018 Accompanying GIS mapping and analysis will be conducted by the City and provided to the Consultant team for the EIS alternatives and evaluation of specific EIS elements. The City will prepare all accompanying figures for the EIS. In addition, if needed, all additional analysis related to the water, sewer, and storm facilities will be completed by the city or provided by the City's consultant (Murray Smith). Cost for additional analysis by the City's consultant is not included in this scope. 2. Scope of Services and Deliverables Task 1: Meetings with City This task includes additional budget for coordination meetings with the City staff and consultant team regarding EIS elements. This will also include identification of available resources, development of a conceptual scenarios etc. Task 2: Lead Public Involvement, Meetings Facilitation, and Working Meetings with Agencies This task includes time for up to five additional public meetings, meetings with the County and City Council to discuss EIS review findings and potential mitigation strategies. This will also include five additional working meetings with multiple departments of the City, WSDOT, Benton -Franklin Council of Government (BFCG) and Franklin County. Deliverables • Presentations, inputs to staff reports, and other materials to support Public and City meetings. Task 3: SEPA EIS Environmental Analysis and Response to Comments This task includes budget for developing Part Four of the SEPA EIS consistent with Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 197-11. Three alternatives will be developed for the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update, including one "No Action" alternative and two "Action" alternatives, including focused evaluation of the UGA expansion area in the two action alternatives. The environmental analysis for these alternatives would evaluate the affected environment, impacts, and mitigation measures for ten elements of the environment, including: Earth; Surface Water: Plants and Animals; Land Use; Shoreline Use; Population, Housing, and Employment; Parks and Recreation; Transportation; Public Services and Utilities; and Heritage Conservation. The proposed level of detail for environmental analysis will be programmatic and City and UGA area -wide, for those areas to develop in the future. This task includes budget for responding to City and public comments on the SEPA EIS Part Four. This process will include a separate City and public comment process, requiring two separate comment/response efforts to occur for the Comprehensive Plan and the EIS. A comment/response matrix will be used to collect and respond to comments received from the City and the public. Page 2 of 5 City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan Update 2018 Subtask 3.1: Supplemental Land Use Analysis • Utilize City provided GIS data to develop a more detailed land capacity analysis • Develop a land use development patterns in the proposed UGA area including commercial, transportation corridors, parks and public lands, and any associated UGA total area updates to support these uses. • Work with the transportation data to ensure that land use plan and traffic assumptions are consistent Subtask 3.2: Develop EIS Alternatives • Develop one new alternative land use scenario • Evaluate and revise the data for the currently proposed land use scenario Prepare existing information for one no -action scenario • Incorporate the preferred alternative into the Comprehensive Plan Elements Subtask 3.3: Supplemental Transportation Analysis and CIP • Obtain or estimate existing traffic volumes on the state highway system within the City, including 51 freeway ramps and roadway segments. Evaluate existing state transportation facilities within the City of Pasco for deficiencies. Incorporate results into previously prepared documentation for Comprehensive Plan. • Assist in the development of two action alternatives land use scenarios described above to address anticipated transportation deficiencies under the traditional land use development pattern. • Evaluate the regional transportation model and perform other research necessary to make manual modifications to traffic volumes on I-182 and other transportation facilities that feed the I-182 corridor including US 395 for two future land use scenarios. • Evaluate the transportation system for two future land use scenarios, focusing on the Road 68, Broadmoor Boulevard, US 395 and I-182 corridors to identify future deficiencies and potential mitigation strategies. • Prepare a traffic analysis for inclusion in the EIS that describes the methodology and results of the alternatives analysis. • Prepare planning level cost estimates for projects identified for the two scenarios. • Incorporate the results of the preferred alternative into the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Pian. • Respond to comments on the draft EIS, and draft Comprehensive Plan and finalize both documents. • Make necessary adjustments on the previously prepared UGA Expansion Capital Facilities Plan. Page 3of5 City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan Update 2018 Subtask 3.4: Supplemental Utilities Analysis and CIP This task includes working with city staff, especially the Planning and Public Works Department, to identify and compare the overall system wide impacts of each alternative. Evaluation will be limited to the water, sewer, and storm utilities. Additional tasks include: • Respond to comments on the draft EIS, and draft Comprehensive Plan and finalize both documents. • Make necessary adjustments on the previously prepared UGA Expansion Capital Facilities Plan. • Identify capacity, requirements and cost estimates for future water and sewer facilities. All relevant maps needed for the document will be provided by the City. Deliverables • Scoping notice • Draft and final SEPA EIS, and associated GIS maps/summaries • Inputs to other SEPA EIS Sections • Comment/response matrix • Final document formatting and editing • Updates in the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the preferred land use scenario Task 4: Project Management This task includes additional budget for preparing monthly invoice and progress reports. Coordination with County and City meetings. Deliverables Monthly invoices and progress reports 3. Assumptions • Research and data collection will be based on readily available secondary sources of information, including previous environmental documents, reports, inventories, maps, and other similar literature from local governments and other sources. • Three alternatives will be selected for the SEPA EIS, including one no action alternative and two action alternatives. Additionally, ten elements of the environment have been selected based on the initial scoping process for this work. Should these alternatives or elements of the environment be substantively revised or new ones be considered, then this scope of work and associated budget may need to be modified. • It is expected that the City and public review and comment on draft documents will occur in accordance with the project schedule. Page 4 of 5 City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan Update 2018 City and public SEPA EIS comments will be relatively minor and will not require new analysis or substantive changes to the analysis. • GIS analysis and figures will be prepared by the City • All water, sewer, and storm water cost estimates, analysis and modeling will be complete/provided by the City or their consultant • This scope of work does not include work related to appeals. Should support for appeals be required, a separate scope of services will need to be developed. Budget can be transferred from one task to another based on needs in the tasks 4. Estimated Costs The following table includes a summary of estimated costs for the proposed scope of work. Task Estimated Cost Task 1: Additional Meetings with City 2,200 Task 2: Lead Public Involvement and Meetings Facilitation 18,000 Task 3: SEPA EIS Environmental Analysis and Response to Comments 85,500 Subtask 3.1: Supplemental Land Use Analysis Subtask 3.2: Develop EIS Alternatives Subtask 3.3: Supplemental Transportation Analysis and CTP 3.4: Supplemental Utilities Analysis and CIP Task 4: Project Management 4,200 TOTAL: 109,900 Page 5 of 5