HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020.01.06 Council Meeting PacketRegular Meeting
AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m.
January 6, 2020
Page
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
3. COUNCIL BUSINESS:
(a) Election of Mayor
(b) Election of Mayor Pro Tem
4. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered
to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion
(in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If
further discussion is desired by Council members or the public, the item may be
removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered
separately.
5 - 15 (a) Approval of Meeting Minutes
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting held on
December 2, 2019 and Special Meetings held on December 9 and 11, 2019.
16 - 18 (b) Bills and Communications
To approve claims in the total amount of $11,048,397.38 ($4,767,175.64 in
Check Nos. 232774-233391; $1,178,258.31 in Electronic Transfer Nos.
826721, 826730-826796, 826800-826991, 827091; $50,738.98 in Check
Nos. 53107-53148; $2,063,353.99 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30141994-
30143015; $2,988,870.46 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 642-648).
To approve bad debt write-off for Utility Billing, Ambulance, Cemetery,
General Accounts, Miscellaneous Accounts, and Municipal Court (non-
criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of
$252,847.66 and, of that amount, authorize $144,512.62 to be turned over
for collection.
19 - 23 (c) Downtown Pasco Development Authority 2020 Funding Agreement
Page 1 of 111
Regular Meeting January 6, 2020
To approve the 2020 Funding Agreement with the Downtown Pasco
Development Authority, and further, authorize the City Manager to execute
the Agreement.
(RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
5. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
6. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: This item is provided to allow
citizens the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to
express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or
for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some
questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative
process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best
directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen
comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with
lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written
information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings.
7. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
24 - 27 (b) General Fund Monthly Report - November 2019
28 (c) 2019 Hanford Communities Annual Report
8. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO:
9. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS:
29 - 38 (a) *Segregation of Local Improvement District (LID) Assessment
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3932, relating to Local
Improvement District No. 150; providing for the segregation of assessments
for certain parcels consistent with RCW 35.44.410; and, ratifying and
confirming prior acts.
39 - 44 (b) NW Area Sanitary Trunk Sewer Local Improvement District Formation
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.3933, relating to public
improvements; declaring its intention to order the improvements of the
Northwest Area Sewer Trunk Main (from Harris Road north to one-quarter
mile past Burns Road and from Burns Road northeast to Broadmoor Blvd)
and to create a local improvement district to assess the cost and expense of
Page 2 of 111
Regular Meeting January 6, 2020
carrying out those improvements against the properties specially benefited
thereby; notifying all persons who desire to object to the improvements to
appear and present their objections at a hearing before the City Council to be
held on February 3, 2020; and providing for other properly related matters.
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
11. NEW BUSINESS:
45 - 72 (a) *Northwest Area Trunk Sewer Design – Approval of Professional
Services Agreement with RH2 Engineering
MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with
RH2 Engineering, in the amount of $556,668 for the NW Area Sewer
Project and further, authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.
73 - 111 (b) *Professional Services Agreement with Murraysmith for the
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements - Phase 1
MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement for
Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements - Phase 1 with
Murraysmith and further, authorize the City Manager to execute the
agreement.
12. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
13. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
14. ADJOURNMENT:
(a) (RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
MF# “Master File #....”
(b)
REMINDERS:
• Thursday, January 9, 7:00 PM: Ben Franklin Transit Board
Meeting – Transit Facility (COUNCILMEMBER RUBEN
ALVARADO, Alt.)
• Monday, January 13, 11:45 AM: Pasco Chamber of Commerce
Membership Luncheon – Pasco Red Lion Hotel
Page 3 of 111
Regular Meeting January 6, 2020
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on
Charter/Spectrum Cable in Pasco and Richland and streamed at
www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for
assistance.
Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la
Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad.
(Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request.
Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure
availability.)
Page 4 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council December 23, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Debby Barham, City Clerk
Administrative & Community Services
SUBJECT: Approval of Meeting Minutes
I. REFERENCE(S):
12.02.19, 12.09.19 & 12.11.19 Draft Council Minutes
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting held on December 2, 2019
and Special Meetings held on December 9 and 11, 2019.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 5 of 111
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 2, 2019
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers present: Ruben Alvarado, Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney,
Saul Martinez, David Milne, Pete Serrano, and Matt Watkins.
Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Steve
Worley, Public Works Director; Rick White, Community & Economic
Development Director; Richa Sigdel, Finance Director; Zach Ratkai,
Administrative & Community Services Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief; Bob
Gear, Fire Chief; and Debby Barham, City Clerk.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA:
Approval of Meeting Minutes
To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting held on November
18, 2019.
Bills and Communications
To approve claims in the total amount of $4,116,063.52 ($2,877,555.66 in
Check Nos. 232540-232773; $481,695.90 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 826403-
826447, 826468-826525, 826531-826621, 826624-826720; $ 20,345.88 in
Check Nos. 53084-53106; $733,329.18 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30141473-
30141993; $3,136.90 in Electronic Transfer No. 641)
December 2019 Council Meeting Cancellations & January 2020 Council
Workshop Change
To cancel the December 16th Regular Council Meeting and December 23rd
Council Workshop; and further more, to change the Council Workshop Meeting
scheduled for January 13, 2020 to 7 PM, January 14, 2020.
2020 Legislative Priorities
To approve Resolution No. 3921, declaring the City's legislative priorities for
the 2020 session of the Washington State Legislature.
Downtown Pasco Development Authority Appointments
To confirm the Mayor's appointment of Miguel Angulo to Position No. 5 and
Jose Iniquez to Position No. 7 on the Downtown Pasco Development Authority
Board, effective 1/01/2020, and to confirm the Mayor's reappointment of Sean
Gehlen to Position No. 1 on the Downtown Pasco Development Authority
Board, effective 1/01/2020.
RC MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve the Consent
Agenda as read. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously by Roll
Call vote.
Page 1 of 6 Page 6 of 111
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 2, 2019
VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS:
Jeff Robinson, Pasco resident, congratulated Council for creating an Arts and
Culture Commission.
Cindi Anderson, Pet Overpopulation Prevention (POPP) Tri-Cities Vice
President, expressed urgency for building the new Tri Cities Animal Shelter
and Control Services facility. POPP Tri-Cities received a $300,000 grant for
low-cost spay and neuter clinic, which would ideally be housed within the new
animal shelter or nearby the new shelter; however, POPP will need a firm
commitment from the three Cities by February 2020.
Julie Webb, Tri Cities Animal Shelter volunteer, also expressed urgency for
building the new animal shelter facility.
Drew Proctor, Kennewick resident, also expressed urgency for building the new
animal shelter facility.
Dawn Hanson, asked Council to consider what their constituents want and
make it a priority relating to a new animal shelter facility.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
General Fund Monthly Report - October 2019
The October 2019 General Fund Report was provided within the agenda packet
with no Council discussion.
Body Worn Camera Program Update "Records Impact"
Police Captain Harpster provided a brief report regarding the impact the Body
Worn Camera (BWC) Program, instituted within the Pasco Police Department
near the beginning of 2019, has had within the Police Department and also
provided statistics on the public records requests generated for BWC records.
Council and staff had a brief discussion regarding the benefits of BWC
program, as well as the costs for fulfilling public records requests associated
with BWC records.
HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO:
2019-2020 Proposed Mid-Biennium Budget Adjustment
Mr. Zabell reminded Council and the audience that this was the City of Pasco's
first biennial budget from 2019-2020 as well as the first mid-biennium budget
adjustment. Mr. Zabell commented on the most notable changes within the
budget.
Mayor Watkins declared the Public Hearing open to consider the proposed
2019-2020 Mid-Biennial Budget Adjustment at 7:36 PM.
Following three calls for comments, Mayor Watkins declared the Public
Hearing closed at 7:37 PM.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4473,
adjusting the 2019-2020 Biennial Operating Budget of the City of Pasco by
Page 2 of 6 Page 7 of 111
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 2, 2019
providing supplement thereto; by appropriating revenue received in excess of
estimated revenues for the current year and by providing transfers and
adjustment authority and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr
Alvarado seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4474,
amending the 2019-2020 Biennial Capital Budget of the City of Pasco by
providing supplement thereto; and, further, authorize publication by summary
only. Ms. Barajas seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS:
Amendments to PMC Title 6: Animal Control - Behavioral Testing
Standards per Amended RCW
Mr. Ratkai provided an overview of the required amendments to the Pasco
Municipal Code (PMC) Title 6: Animal Control imposed by Washington State
law.
Mayor Watkins opened a public comment period to the members of the
audience allowing them an opportunity to express their thoughts on the PMC
Title 6: Animal Control.
Deb Sporcich, Animal Control Director, expressed support of removing the
breed specific language within the PMC by telling her story of a dog that she
cared for in the shelter when she was a volunteer.
Melissa Madison, Benton City resident, distributed copies of her dog rescue
business to Council, which included stories of her rescue dogs; she also
expressed support of removing the breed specific language within the PMC.
Tom A., Pasco resident, is a pit bull dog owner and he expressed support of
removing the breed specific language within the PMC.
Elizabeth Leck, Pasco resident, expressed support of removing the breed
specific language within the PMC and stated that the language is
discriminatory.
Sherri Jorgen, Pasco resident, expressed support of removing the breed specific
language within the PMC and stated that this language is preventing many good
dogs good homes.
Rob Wesfall, Yakima Humane Society, stated that the City of Yakima
removed their breed specific language about a year and a half ago and the with
the removal of the breed specific language, Yakima is able to deal with the bad
(dog) owner problem. He expressed support of removing the breed specific
language within the PMC.
Christina Amos, Richland resident and certified dog trainer, expressed support
of removing the breed specific language within the PMC and allow the animal
control officers to address irresponsible pet owners.
Jeff Robinson, Pasco resident, reminded everyone of why the breed specific
language was enacted ten years ago. He stated that while he is opposed to breed
specific language and perhaps it is time for the City to reassess the need for
breed specific language now, he supports the City's prior actions and trusts that
the City will review the issue as it stands today.
Ashley Schoenwald, Richland resident, distributed copies of email and other pit
Page 3 of 6 Page 8 of 111
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 2, 2019
bull documents to Council and she expressed support of removing the breed
specific language from the PMC.
Mr. Serrano asked of the dogs at the Tri Cities Animal Shelter, how many are
pit bull mixture and of those dogs, how many were not adopted out.
Julie Webb, Tri Cities Animal Shelter volunteer, displayed a collage of pit bull
mix photos and pointed out that three of the 12 dogs were not adopted out as of
December 2.
Shannon Jolson, dog groomer, expressed concern about cost of the Canine-
Good Citizen (CGC) and the availability non-English language CGC testers and
she also expressed support of removing the breed specific language from the
PMC.
Kristen, Pasco resident, expressed support of removing the breed specific
language from the PMC.
Dawn Hanson, Kennewick resident and Tri Cities Animal Shelter volunteer,
expressed support of removing the breed specific language from the PMC.
Mayor Watkins and several Councilmembers thanked everyone that spoke,
appreciated the comments from those individuals confirming that Council
wants to do right thing and wished all dog owners were as caring and
supportive as the individuals speaking about the animals they care for. Mayor
Watkins summarized the comments, provided a brief history of the PMC Title
6: Animal Control and encouraged Council to review the PMC related to
animal control in 2020 during their annual retreat.
Amanda Cameron, Pasco resident, commented on the cost of CGC requirement
for her two dogs.
Mary Mahoney, Pasco resident, commented about an old agreement between
the Animal Control Authority and Washington State University and believed
the ordinances related to potentially dangerous or dangerous dogs within Pasco,
Kennewick or Richland did not abide by the constitution of due process and
need to be rewritten.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4475,
amending PMC Sections 6.05.010 'Definition of terms'; 6.05.080 'Disposition
of unclaimed animals'; 6.05.110 'Refusal to redeem'; 6.05.320 'Notice of
quarantine'; and 6.05.330 'Potentially dangerous and dangerous animals', and
further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Serrano seconded. Motion
carried unanimously.
Q* Iniguez Rezone (Z 2019-011)
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4476,
rezoning two parcels located at the northeast corner of East Alvina Street and
North Franklin Avenue from R-1 to R-3, and further, authorize publication by
summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Q* Mendoza Rezone (Z 2019-012)
Mr. Alvarado and Mr. White briefly discussed the City's criteria used to weigh-
in-on when considering a rezone of a property.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4477,
rezoning a parcel located at 2216 W Henry Place from R -2 to R-3, and further,
authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Alvarado seconded. Motion
Page 4 of 6 Page 9 of 111
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 2, 2019
carried unanimously.
Interfund and Intrafund Loans
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3922,
authorizing the interfund loans from the General Fund to the City's Marina
Fund and Stadium Fund. Mr. Milne seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3923,
authorizing the intrafund loans from the Water Utility to the Irrigation Utility
and Process Water Reuse Facility Utility. Mr. Serrano seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
*Personal Services Agreement Extension - Animal Control Services
Council expressed concern about the maintenance of the current animal shelter
facilities. Council and staff discussed the maintenance issues with the current
facilities and the 2020 budget, as well as the status of the new animal shelter
facilities.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve the extension of the
Personal Services Agreement with Chicle Animal Foundation for Animal
Control Services and, further authorize the City Manager to execute the
agreement. Ms. Barajas seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
*Performance of a City Official
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to accept the final report by
Kenbrio Inc. reflecting the City Council's corporate view of the City Manager's
performance for the period June 2018 - June 2019. Mr. Alvarado seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
Mr. Zabell announced Winter Fest is scheduled for Saturday, December 7, 2019
from 2 PM to 4 PM at Volunteer Park; also, the Lampson Cable Bridge Run is
scheduled for Saturday, December 21, 2019 starting at 9:00 AM and so far
1,300 runners have registered. Mr. Zabell commented on an upcoming
amendment for the 2020 BDI solid waste rates with an approximate reduction
of 0.7 percent. Lastly, he reminded Council that the Chapel Hill Roundabout
ribbon cutting ceremony was scheduled for Friday, December 6, 2019 at 1:00
PM.
Mr. Martinez commented about the new businesses along north side of Road 68
and that the Luminary was scheduled on Saturday, December 14, 2019.
Ms. Barajas announced the Pasco Employee Appreciation Recognition (PEAR)
Party was scheduled for Friday, December 6, 2019 at 6:30 PM in the Pasco
Police Training Center and will be hosted by the Pasco Safe Area Community
organization.
Mayor Watkins noted that the last Council meeting for 2019 will be a Special
Meeting and Workshop combination scheduled for Monday, December 9, 2019
and it will be his last meeting.
Page 5 of 6 Page 10 of 111
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 2, 2019
ADJOURNMENT.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:06 PM.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of January, 2020.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Matt Watkins, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 6 of 6 Page 11 of 111
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 9, 2019
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers present: Ruben Alvarado, Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney,
Saul Martinez, David Milne, Pete Serrano, and Matt Watkins.
Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Eric Ferguson, City Attorney; Rick
White, Community & Economic Development Director; Zach Ratkai,
Administrative & Community Services Director; Ken Roske, Police Chief, Bob
Gear, Fire Chief and City Clerk Barham.
Mayor Watkins introduced Boy Scout Troop No. 159 and invited the Troop to
lead the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance.
OATH OF OFFICE:
Judge Stilwill administered the Oath of Office to the newly re-elected
Councilmembers: Ruben Alvarado, District No. 2, Position 2 and David Milne,
District No. 5, Position 5 effective January 1, 2020.
Judge Roach administered the Oath of Office to newly elected Councilmember
Zahra Roach, At Large, Position No. 7, effective January 1, 2020.
RECOGNITION OF MAYOR WATKINS
Mayor Pro Tem Maloney lead the Council in recognizing Mayor Watkins for
16 years of service to the City of Pasco. Council read and presented a
proclamation of appreciation to Mayor Watkins. The audience filled with
community members, as well as family and friends of Mayor Watkins also
commended him for his many accomplishments associated with the City and
the Tri-Cities region as a whole.
Council also gave Mayor Watkins a ceremonial "Key" to the City and a
remembrance photo book of his years on Council.
MEETING RECESS:
Mayor Watkins called a brief recess from 7:05 PM to 7:20 PM.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS:
Non-Represented and Management Wage and Salary Plans
Mr. Zabell briefly explained the rationale used in determining the proposed
2020 wage and salary plans for non-represented and management positions.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4478,
providing for certain adjustments in the non-represented, non-management
wage plan beginning January 1, 2020 and, further, authorize publication by
summary only. Mr. Alvarado seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4479,
providing for certain adjustments in the management salary plan beginning
Page 1 of 3 Page 12 of 111
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 9, 2019
January 1, 2020 and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Ms.
Barajas seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution Related to Refugee Resettlement (EO 13888)
Mr. Zabell noted that one additional sentence within the resolution to include a
statement that the City Council encourages the Franklin County Board of
Commissioners to also provide its consent for refugee resettlement within the
corporate boundaries of Franklin County.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3924,
declaring an intent to grant consent for the relocation of refugees within
municipal boundaries per United States Executive Order 13888. Mr. Serrano
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
*Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement - Columbia Basin College
Student Housing
Mr. Ratkai explained the purpose of the requested amendment extending the
deadline for the option to purchase and develop Sub-Parcel B, as well as a
change with the reversionary period within the purchase and sale agreement for
the property located in the SE quadrants of 20th Avenue and Argent Road.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3925,
authorizing Amendment No. 1 to the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the
City of Pasco and CBC Student Housing, LLC, and further, to authorize the
City Manager to execute said amendment. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion
carried unanimously.
Project Acceptance - Multiple Public Works Projects
Mr. McCue provided an overview of the six public works projects that were
ready to be accepted formally as required by Washington State law.
Council and staff briefly discussed the projects.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3926,
accepting work performed by Apollo, Inc. under contract for the Columbia
Water Supply Project. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3927,
accepting work performed by Culbert Construction, Inc. under contract for the
Oregon Avenue (SR395) Phase 1 Project. Ms. Barajas seconded. Motion
carried unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3928,
accepting work performed by Culbert Construction, Inc. under contract for the
Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main Project. Mr. Alvarado. Motion carried
unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3929,
accepting work performed by Townsend Controls & Electric LLC, under
contract for the Butterfield WTP PLC & Controls Upgrades Project. Mr. Milne
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3930,
accepting work performed by Goodman & Mehlenbacher Ent., Inc. under
contract for the Waterline Extension – Schuman Lane Project. Mr. Serrano
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3931,
Page 2 of 3 Page 13 of 111
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 9, 2019
accepting work performed by Central Washington Asphalt under contract for
the 20th Avenue Overlay Project. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
Request to Invite Governor of Colima to Participate in 2020 Cinco de
Mayo Festival
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to authorize the Mayor to execute
the 2020 Pasco Cinco de Mayo Festival invitation letter to the Governor of
Colima. Mr. Serrano seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Basin Disposal Inc. - Amendment to 2020 Rates
Mr. Zabell stated that the Basin Disposal Inc. senior staff reassessed their
proposed 2020 fees and decided to reduce the 2020 fees increase by about 0.7
percent, which will result in a 3.4 percent increase instead of the original 4.08
percent increase previously approved at the November 12 Council meeting.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Maloney moved to confirm the solid waste
disposal rates for 2020 as presented by BDI. Mr. Alvarado seconded. Motion
carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT.
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:00 PM.
PASSED and APPROVED the 6th day of January, 2020.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Matt Watkins, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 3 of 3 Page 14 of 111
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 11, 2019
ATTENDANCE:
Councilmembers present: Ruben Alvarado, Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney,
Saul Martinez, David Milne, Pete Serrano, and Matt Watkins.
Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Steve Worley, Public Works
Director, Zach Ratkai, Administrative & Community Services Director; Ken
Roske, Police Chief, Bob Gear, Fire Chief and City Clerk Barham.
PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
The City of Pasco's Council and Staff along with many community members,
family and friends gathered together at the Pasco Red Lion Hotel from 5:30 PM
to 8:00 PM to express their appreciation to Mayor Watkins for his 16 years
serving Pasco, Washington and to wish him well during his travels over the
next two years.
ADJOURNMENT.
The special meeting adjourned at 8:15 PM.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of January, 2020.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Matt Watkins, Mayor Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 1 of 1 Page 15 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 3, 2020
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Bills and Communications
I. REFERENCE(S):
Accounts Payable 01.06.20
Bad Debt Write-off/Collection
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve claims in the total amount of $11,048,397.38 ($4,767,175.64 in Check Nos.
232774-233391; $1,178,258.31 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 826721, 826730-826796,
826800-826991, 827091; $50,738.98 in Check Nos. 53107-53148; $2,063,353.99 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 30141994-30143015; $2,988,870.46 in Electronic Transfer
Nos. 642-648).
To approve bad debt write-off for Utility Billing, Ambulance, Cemetery, General
Accounts, Miscellaneous Accounts, and Municipal Court (non-criminal, criminal, and
parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of $252,847.66 and, of that amount,
authorize $144,512.62 to be turned over for collection.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 16 of 111
REPORTING PERIOD:
January 6, 2020
Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined
Check Numbers 232774-233391 53107-53148
Total Check Amount $4,767,175.64 $50,738.98 Total Checks 4,817,914.62$
Electronic Transfer Numbers 826721 30141994-30143015 642-648
826730-826796
826800-826991
827091
Total EFT Amount $1,178,258.31 $2,063,353.99 $2,988,870.46 $0.00 Total EFTs 6,230,482.76$
Grand Total 11,048,397.38$
Councilmember
2,316,480.03
31,815.86
0.00
0.00
35,295.40
43.85
7,654.76
56,621.26
3,234.38
29,025.31
119,101.49
1,596.11
7,544.27
194.94
58,270.85
1,073.56
1,924.47
8,178.63
0.00
17,031.34
3,077.44
HOTEL/MOTEL EXCISE TAX 17,086.70
0.00
1,396,266.71
3,662,721.32
95,497.06
10,820.60
149,221.75
4,393.32
3,014,225.97
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:11,048,397.38$
MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE
FLEX
PAYROLL CLEARING
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LODGING
LITTER ABATEMENT
REVOLVING ABATEMENT
TRAC DEVELOPMENT & OPERATING
PARKS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER
LID
GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
UTILITY, WATER/SEWER
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL
RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN
C.D. BLOCK GRANT
HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT
MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER
AMBULANCE SERVICE
CEMETERY
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS
GOLF COURSE
SENIOR CENTER OPERATING
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY
STREET OVERLAY
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as
described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim.
Dave Zabell, City Manager Richa Sigdel, Finance Director
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this
6th day of January, 2020 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment:
Councilmember
SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND
STREET
ARTERIAL STREET
The City Council
November 27, 2019 - January 2, 2020
C I T Y O F P A S C O
Council Meeting of:
Accounts Payable Approved
Page 17 of 111
BAD DEBT WRITE-OFF/COLLECTION
November 1, – November 30, 2019
1. UTILITY BILLING - These are all inactive accounts, 60 days or older. Direct write-off are
under $20 with no current forwarding address, or are accounts in "occupant" status. Accounts
submitted for collection exceed $20.00.
2. AMBULANCE - These are all delinquent accounts over 90 days past due or statements are
returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00. Direct
write off including DSHS and Medicare customers; the law requires that the City accept
assignment in these cases.
3. COURT ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - These are all delinquent non-criminal and criminal
fines, and parking violations over 30 days past due.
4. CODE ENFORCEMENT – LIENS - These are Code Enforcement violation penalties which
are either un-collectable or have been assigned for collections because the property owner has
not complied or paid the fine. There are still liens in place on these amounts which will
continue to be in effect until the property is brought into compliance and the debt associated
with these liens are paid.
5. CEMETERY - These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements are returned
with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00.
6. GENERAL - These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements are return ed
with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00.
7. MISCELLANEOUS - These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements are
returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00.
Direct
Write-off
Referred to
Collection
Total
Write-off
Utility Billing $ 11.77 150.70 162.47
Ambulance $ 108,323.27 31,965.40 140,288.67
Court A/R $ .00 100,675.00 100,675.00
Code Enforcement $ .00 10,570.00 10,570.00
Cemetery $ .00 1,151.52 1,151.52
General $ .00 .00 .00
Miscellaneous $ .00 .00 .00
TOTAL: $ 108,335.04 144,512.62 252,847.66
Page 18 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council December 20, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Downtown Pasco Development Authority 2020 Funding Agreement
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed 2020 Funding Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve the 2020 Funding Agreement with the Downtown Pasco Development
Authority, and further, authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
$100,000, with up to $75,000 returned to City via Main Street Utility Tax Credit
Program.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City has typically funded the Downtown Pasco Development Authority (DPDA) in
two-year increments; however, because of the organizational transition in 2019, the
prior agreement was extended by two (2) six -month extensions, the second of which
expired at the end of 2019.
The DPDA hired a new Executive Director in 2019 who will be working with the
DPDA Board this year to develop a new five-year strategic plan.
V. DISCUSSION:
Following the completion of a strategic plan, the DPDA will be in a better position to
define its activities and goals for a two-year funding agreement, in sync with the 2021-
2022 biennial budget. In order to maintain concurrency with the City's biennial budget
cycle, staff is recommending this one-year agreement for 2020.
Page 19 of 111
The proposal will establish a one-year agreement for funding and it contains a clause
allowing reconsideration by Council should the DPDA become ineligible for the Main
Street Utility Tax Credit Program.
Council generally concurred with this direction when this item was considered at the
December 9, 2019, Workshop Meeting.
Page 20 of 111
DPDA Funding Agreement - 1
DOWNTOWN PASCO DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FUNDING AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ______ day of ______________ 2020,
by and between the City of Pasco, Washington, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to
as “City,” and the Downtown Pasco Development Authority, a non-profit Washington
Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “DPDA.”
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to foster revitalization of the downtown business
area and created the Downtown Pasco Development Authority (DPDA) in December 2010 under
Ordinance No. 3985, with the expectation of providing a three-year funding commitment to permit
the new agency to establish operations and demonstrate its ability to fulfill the revitalization goals
enunciated in Ordinance No. 3985 and the DPDA Charter; and
WHEREAS, DPDA has received a certificate of incorporation from the State of
Washington as a non-profit corporation; and
WHEREAS, DPDA has organized and developed operating procedures, hired an
executive director, reinitiated public events in Downtown Pasco (Cinco de Mayo and the Fiery
Foods Festival), undertaken management of the Pasco Farmers Market and Pasco Commercial
Kitchen, became a 501(c) (3) organization, became a certified Washington State Main Street
organization, conducted several business education classes and Downtown clean-up events, and
participated in the development of a Peanuts Park and Pasco Farmers Market refurbishment, and
(with City financial assistance) completed a 5 year Strategic Work Plan including website revisions
and “branding;” and
WHEREAS, DPDA tasks for 2020 include:
1. Develop and adopt a new 5-year Strategic Plan;
2. Organize quarterly downtown business and property owner meetings:
3. Organize, finance and manage Cinco De Mayo Festival;
4. Organize, finance and manage Fiery Foods Festival;
5. Organize and manage the Pasco Farmers Market each Saturday from May through October;
6. Manage the operations of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen;
7. Provide a scholarship grant program consistent with the DPDA’s 501(c)(3) status,
8. Continue recruitment for vacant downtown business space;
9. Create and maintain a Downtown Property Inventory;
10. Business recruitment, development and engagement activities.
WHEREAS, DPDA has requested that additional City funding be made available to
develop resources to eventually reduce the amount of the City subsidy; NOW THEREFORE,
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valuable
consideration, it is agreed as follows:
Section 1: DPDA Responsibilities
The DPDA shall conduct its activities and efforts that further the purpose of the DPDA as
identified in Pasco Ordinance 3985 and Article IV of its Charter to include but not be limited to:
Page 21 of 111
DPDA Funding Agreement - 2
Review of City plans and policies. The DPDA shall review existing and evolving City land
use and capital improvement plans and policies affecting the Downtown Area and advise
the city of appropriate considerations.
Façade Improvement Program. The DPDA shall provide information, applications and
professional assistance to Downtown Area property owners wishing to participate in an
approved and funded Community Development Block Grant façade program.
Promotional Events. The DPDA should conduct or implement an additional promotional
or special event in addition to Cinco de Mayo and the Fiery Foods Festival that contribute
to the success of the Downtown Area or otherwise advance the goals of the DPDA.
Financing Strategy. In collaboration with City staff and/or other professionals, the DPDA
will develop a comprehensive inventory of public and private capital and development
financing tools and incentives that may be available to foster and support its revitalization
efforts. These should include tax credits or other incentives and identification of
infrastructure and other public capital investments that may be necessary to support private
redevelopment projects.
Marketing. The DPDA shall develop a strategy to identify and promote economic vitality
of the Downtown Area including the opportunities associated with the Farmer’s Market
and Specialty Kitchen. These strategies may include: creation of a Downtown Calendar,
quarterly business meetings for Downtown businesses, restaurant recruitment for vacant or
available properties and completion of the Downtown Survey.
Farmer’s Market and Pasco Specialty Kitchen. The DPDA shall optimize the opportunities
associated with the Farmer’s Market and Specialty Kitchen to increase economic activity
and promote recognition of the Downtown. Operation of these facilities must be in
accordance with the associated lease agreement.
Reports: A formal presentation to the City Council by the DPDA board shall be given on
or before December 1 each year. The DPDA shall deliver quarterly written status reports to the
Pasco City Manager detailing the activities, accomplishments and financial status of the DPDA.
Section 2: City Responsibilities
The City of Pasco will remit to DPDA or its designated bank up to $25,000 per quarter by
the 10th day of the first month of said quarter.
Section 3: Term
This agreement shall be effective January 1, 2020 and shall expire on December 31, 2020;
provided, however, either party may terminate the agreement with at least 180 days written notice
delivered to the President of the DPDA or the Pasco City Manager. It is further provided that this
agreement is predicated on the DPDA maintaining its Main Street status for calendar year 2020,
and the City’s contribution, as described in Section 2, is deemed eligible for Main Street tax credits
by the State Department of Revenue. Should the DPDA become ineligible for Main Street tax
credits, this Agreement may be returned to the Pasco City Council for determining its continuation.
The agreement may be extended up to 24 additional months, by mutual agreement of the
parties, subject to budget authority of the city manager.
Page 22 of 111
DPDA Funding Agreement - 3
Section 4: General Provisions
For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence. Failure of the DPDA to either
provide the accounting or remit disallowed funds as required herein shall constitute a breach of
this agreement. The remedies available to the City shall include but not be limited to, return of all
funds delivered to the DPDA and denial of the right of the DPDA to apply for any future funding.
In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default or interpretation of this
Agreement, the parties shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve suc h dispute. In the event
the dispute cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be resolved by
arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, and the Mandatory Arbitration Rules (MAR);
venue shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington, the laws of the State of Washington shall
apply; and the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed
this ______, day of ______________, 2020.
CITY OF PASCO DOWNTOWN PASCO DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
_______________________________ _______________________________
Dave Zabell, City Manager Gabriel Portugal, President
Page 23 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 2, 2020
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: General Fund Monthly Report - November 2019
I. REFERENCE(S):
General Fund Report
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
N/A
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Attached is a monthly financial update to Council on the General Fund, the City's
major fund. The administration provides quarterly reports to Council for other non-
major funds.
V. DISCUSSION:
2, December the approved adjustment budget a Council during Council 2019,
Workshop meeting. Budget adjustment approved during the meeting is included in the
attached executed report. Any contracts over $100,000 and under $300,000
administratively in the month of November are also included in the report.
Page 24 of 111
$0$10,000$20,000$30,000$40,000$50,000$60,000JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DECThousands2019-2020 Cumulative General Fund Revenue & Expenditures2019 Cumulative Revenue2019 Cumulative Expenditures5-Yr Average Rev5-Yr Average ExpPage 25 of 111
Fund NameFund DescriptionReport MonthNovember, 2019Elapsed Time45%2017 Actual 2018 Actual2019-2020 Adjusted Budget*2019-2020 Actual2019-2020 ProjectedVariance% of Biennial BudgetCommentsRevenuesTaxesProperty 7,963,302 8,352,750 21,648,971 10,363,623 21,648,971 0 48%Sales 13,180,233 14,154,008 28,570,809 13,452,960 28,570,809 0 47%Public Safety 1,523,723 1,661,707 3,389,400 1,533,320 3,389,400 0 45%Utility 9,409,979 9,585,916 19,123,919 9,361,252 19,123,919 0 49%Other 1,252,023 1,299,862 2,397,750 1,191,325 2,397,750 0 50%Licenses & Permits 2,177,235 2,640,720 4,988,400 2,527,699 4,988,400 0 51% Higher than expected building permits, and increase in number of business licenses.Intergovernmental 2,130,300 2,294,273 4,841,868 2,266,544 4,841,868 0 47%Charges Goods & Services 6,932,637 7,385,382 15,327,718 7,023,271 15,327,718 0 46%Fines & Forfeits 788,474 943,321 1,714,200 821,927 1,714,200 0 48%Miscellaneous 657,342 1,731,200 2,198,950 1,787,900 2,198,950 0 81% Revenue mostly includes property sales revenue that cannot be predicted for 2020.Debt & Transfer In 638,000 232,298 22,455,200 219,157 22,455,200 0 1% Timing of debt proceeds and grant transfers. Long Term investment on Chapel Hill LID, GESA Stadium and Animal Shelter transfer.Total Revenues 46,653,248 50,281,437 126,657,185 50,548,977 126,657,185 0 40%ExpendituresCity Council 111,918 124,533 260,540 106,293 260,540 0 41%Municipal Court 1,458,682 1,504,212 3,252,697 1,371,774 3,252,697 0 42%City Manager 1,709,640 1,635,045 3,806,136 1,254,353 3,806,136 0 33% Labor and non-labor items expected to be expended during 2020.Police 16,497,955 16,565,400 36,324,184 14,852,689 36,324,184 0 41%Fire 7,660,554 7,874,894 16,062,340 6,929,913 16,062,340 0 43%Administrative & Community Services 7,370,500 7,502,803 16,497,814 6,935,817 16,497,814 0 42%Community & Economic Development 1,748,053 1916402 3,878,345 1,778,777 3,878,345 0 46%Finance 2,196,310 2,270,459 5,231,873 2,293,824 5,231,873 0 44%Engineering 1,726,983 1,555,552 3,531,421 1,407,429 3,531,421 0 40%Library 1,445,550 1,375,894 2,905,818 1,297,470 2,905,818 0 45%Non-Departmental 2,025,292 2,795,354 4,371,905 1,709,413 4,371,905 0 39% Timing of receipt and payment of bills.Debt & Transfer Out 3,592,619 1,914,455 29,341,750 3,154,181 29,341,750 0 11% Timing of debt payments. Long Term investment on Chapel Hill LID, GESA Stadium and Animal Shelter transfer, as well as changes to schedules in capital budget. Total Expenditures 47,544,056 47,035,003 125,464,823 43,091,934 125,464,823 0 34%Status - LaborStatus - Non Labor*Budget includes Biennial budget adjustment approved by Council on December 2nd, 2019.General FundLargest fund within the City portfolio. Taxes are major revenue sources and Public Safety salaries and benefits are major expenses within this fund.City is expected to be on track for labor expenses.City is expected to be on track for non labor expenses.Page 26 of 111
Recipient Contract Type DescriptionContract AmountAmendment Contract Total PACE Engineering Amendment No. 2 Foster Wells Forcemain Improvements PSA 212,162$ 5,000$ 217,162$ Contracts/Purchases Over $100,000 and less than $300,000Page 27 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council December 18, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: 2019 Hanford Communities Annual Report
I. REFERENCE(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
None
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Hanford Communities was formed and exists to facilitate a coordinated local
government involvement in decision making regarding Hanford environmental
contamination; remediation, waste management, emergency response, and work force
and site transition issues.on issues affecting our jurisdictions. The organization works
to increase public awareness and involvement in Hanford cleanup issues. Board
members interact with DOE, the Washington State Department of Ecology, the EPA
and others. Hanford Community members consist of the cities of Kennewick, Pasco,
Richland and West Richland, Benton and Franklin counties and the Port of Benton.
V. DISCUSSION:
Hanford Communities Executive Director Brown-Larsen, will provide the annual
Hanford Communities report to Council.
Page 28 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council January 2, 2020
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Finance Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Segregation of Local Improvement District (LID) Assessment
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: Local to relating _________, No. approve to move I Resolution
Improvement District No. 150; providing for the segregation of assessments for certain
parcels consistent with RCW 35.44.410; and, ratifying and confirming prior acts.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On August 20, 2018, the Council created Local Improvement District No. 150 (“LID
No. 150”) to finance the cost of constructing Chapel Hill Boulevard improvements.
The final assessment roll for LID No. 150 was confirmed and approved on April 1,
2019. Subsequent to the final assessment roll confirmation, a number of properties
within the LID have been subdivided through final plat approval.
V. DISCUSSION:
State law requires that Council approve the segregation of LID assessments in the
event of a subdivision of property within the LID. Council determines that assessments
Page 29 of 111
against the subdivided parcels may be assessed as nearly as possible on the same basis
as the original assessments were levied, and the total of the segregated parts of the
assessment equals the assessment amounts before segregation. Based on the
recommendations of bond counsel, staff is recommending approval the of the
segregation of four parcels associated with LID 150 as of December 31, 2019.
Page 30 of 111
Resolution - 1
RESOLUTION NO. ____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, RELATING TO LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO.
150; PROVIDING FOR THE SEGREGATION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR
CERTAIN PARCELS CONSISTENT WITH RCW 35.44.410; AND,
RATIFYING AND CONFIRMING PRIOR ACTS.
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Ordinance No. 4393 passed on August 20, 2018, the City Council
of the City of Pasco, Washington (the “City”), created Local Improvement District No. 150 (“LID
No. 150”) to finance the cost of constructing Chapel Hill Boulevard improvements; and
WHEREAS, the final assessment roll for LID No. 150 was confirmed by Ordinance 4429
(April 1, 2019); and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the final assessment roll confirmation, a number of properties
within the LID have been subdivided through final plat approval; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.44.410 provides that whenever land against which there has been
levied a special assessment has been sold in part or subdivided, the legislative authority of that
City has the power to order a segregation of the assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that assessments against the subdivided parcels
may be assessed as nearly as possible on the same basis as the original assessments were levied,
and the total of the segregated parts of the assessment equals the assessment amounts before
segregation, NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, as follows:
Section 1. Assessment Segregations Approved. The following parcels in LID No. 150
are segregated for assessment as follows:
1.1 Tax Parcel 117-510-078 (LID Parcel No. 3.0): The assessment against this
parcel is segregated into 28 assessments against the 28 parcels as shown on attached
Exhibit A (Chiawana Heights Phase 3).
1.2 Tax Parcels 117-510-190 and 117-511-045 (LID Parcel No. 2.86): The
assessments against these parcels are segregated into assessments against the parcels as
shown on attached Exhibits B (45 parcels - Riverhawk Estates Phase 3) and C (42 parcels
- Riverhawk Estates Phase 4).
1.3 Tax Parcel 117-510-167 (LID Parcel No. 2.87): The assessment against this
parcel is segregated into 64 assessments against the 64 parcels as shown on attached
Exhibit D (Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1).
Page 31 of 111
Resolution - 2
1.4 117-510-036 (LID Parcel No. 4.0): The assessments against this parcel is
segregated into 29 assessments against the 29 parcels as shown on attached Exhibit E
Sorano Heights, Phase 1).
Section 2. Administration. City staff is directed to implement this Resolution and take
all actions necessary and appropriate to segregate the assessments, including recording of this
Resolution, as detailed in Exhibits A, B, C, D and E.
Section 3. Ratification. All acts prior to and consistent with this Resolution are hereby
ratified and confirmed
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 6th day of January, 2020.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 32 of 111
Exhibit A - Chiawana Heights Phase 3
LID
Parcel
No. 3.0 117510078
LOT 3 OF RECORD SURVEY 1847849
EXCEPT CHIAWANA HEIGHTS
PHASE 1 39,873.44$ 6.78 acres
117510301 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 1 1,334.35$
117510302 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 2 1,412.84$
117510303 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 3 1,334.35$
117510304 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 4 1,962.28$
117510305 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 5 1,334.35$
117510306 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 6 1,334.35$
117510307 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 7 1,334.35$
117510308 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 8 1,334.35$
117510309 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 9 1,412.84$
117510310 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 10 1,334.35$
117510311 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 11 1,334.35$
117510312 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 12 1,334.35$
117510313 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 13 1,334.35$
117510314 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 14 1,334.35$
117510315 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 15 1,334.35$
117510316 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 16 1,334.35$
117510317 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 17 1,412.84$
117510318 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 18 1,412.84$
117510319 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 19 1,412.84$
117510320 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 20 1,412.84$
117510321 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 21 1,569.82$
117510322 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 22 1,334.35$
117510323 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 23 1,412.84$
117510324 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 24 1,491.33$
117510325 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 25 1,569.82$
117510326 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 26 1,569.82$
117510327 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 27 1,569.82$
117510328 CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 3 LOT 28 1,569.82$
Total lots Total allocated to lots 39,873.44$
Subdivided into 28 lots
Page 33 of 111
Exhibit B - Riverhawk Estates Phase 3
LID Parcel
No. 2.86 117510190 241,236.94$ 23.51 acres Subdivided into 45 lots
117511001 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 1 2,095.57$
117511002 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 2 2,095.57$
117511003 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 3 2,095.57$
117511004 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 4 2,095.57$
117511005 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 5 2,095.57$
117511006 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 6 2,218.84$
117511007 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 7 2,218.84$
117511008 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 8 2,095.57$
117511009 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 9 2,218.84$
117511010 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 10 2,218.84$
117511011 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 11 2,218.84$
117511012 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 12 2,218.84$
117511013 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 13 2,218.84$
117511014 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 14 2,218.84$
117511015 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 15 2,095.57$
117511016 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 16 2,095.57$
117511017 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 17 2,095.57$
117511018 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 18 2,095.57$
117511019 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 19 2,095.57$
117511020 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 20 1,972.30$
117511021 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 21 1,972.30$
117511022 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 22 2,095.57$
117511023 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 23 2,095.57$
117511024 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 24 2,465.37$
117511025 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 25 2,095.57$
117511026 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 26 2,958.45$
117511027 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 27 1,972.30$
117511028 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 28 2,095.57$
117511029 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 29 2,711.91$
117511030 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 30 2,342.11$
117511031 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 31 2,342.11$
117511032 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 32 2,342.11$
117511033 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 33 2,342.11$
117511034 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 34 2,342.11$
117511035 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 35 2,465.37$
117511036 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 36 2,095.57$
117511037 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 37 2,095.57$
117511038 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 38 2,095.57$
117511039 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 39 2,095.57$
117511040 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 40 2,095.57$
117511041 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 41 2,095.57$
117511042 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 42 2,095.57$
117511043 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 43 2,218.84$
117511044 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 3 LOT 44 2,465.37$
117511045 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 2 TRACT A 144,470.97$
Total 241,236.94$ Total allocated to subdivided lots
Riverhawk Estates Ph1 , Tract A
Page 34 of 111
Exhibit C - Riverhawk Estates Phase 4
LID Parcel
No. 2.86 117511045 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 2 TRACT A 144,470.97$ 11.72 Acres subdivided into 42 lots
117511051 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 1 3,899.35$
117511052 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 2 3,314.45$
117511053 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 3 3,314.45$
117511054 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 4 3,314.45$
117511055 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 5 3,314.45$
117511056 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 6 3,899.35$
117511057 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 7 3,119.48$
117511058 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 8 3,314.45$
117511059 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 9 3,314.45$
117511060 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 10 3,314.45$
117511061 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 11 3,509.42$
117511062 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 12 3,314.45$
117511063 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 13 3,314.45$
117511064 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 14 3,314.45$
117511065 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 15 3,314.45$
117511066 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 16 3,314.45$
117511067 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 17 3,314.45$
117511068 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 18 3,314.45$
117511069 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 19 3,314.45$
117511070 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 20 3,314.45$
117511071 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 21 4,094.32$
117511072 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 22 4,289.29$
117511073 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 23 3,704.38$
117511074 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 24 3,704.38$
117511075 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 25 3,314.45$
117511076 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 26 3,314.45$
117511077 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 27 3,314.45$
117511078 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 28 3,314.45$
117511079 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 29 3,314.45$
117511080 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 30 3,314.45$
117511081 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 31 3,704.38$
117511082 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 32 3,314.45$
117511083 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 33 3,314.45$
117511084 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 34 3,314.45$
117511085 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 35 3,314.45$
117511086 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 36 3,704.38$
117511087 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 37 3,704.38$
117511088 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 38 3,314.45$
117511089 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 39 3,314.45$
117511090 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 40 3,314.45$
117511091 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 41 3,314.45$
117511092 RIVERHAWK ESTATES PHASE 4 LOT 42 3,704.38$
144,470.97$ Total Allocated to Lots
Page 35 of 111
Exhibit D - Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1
LID
Parcel No.
2.87 117510167 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Tract B 494,350.58$ 48.18 Acres Subdivided into 64 lots
117-510-450 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Tract A 307,523.23$
117-510-451 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 1 2,646.92$
117-510-452 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 2 3,092.88$
117-510-453 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 3 4,152.72$
117-510-454 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 4 3,358.11$
117-510-455 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 5 2,971.68$
117-510-456 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 6 3,259.36$
117-510-457 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 7 2,998.06$
117-510-458 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 8 2,998.06$
117-510-459 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 9 2,997.70$
117-510-460 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 10 2,997.70$
117-510-461 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 11 2,997.70$
117-510-462 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 12 2,997.34$
117-510-463 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 13 2,997.34$
117-510-464 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 14 2,996.99$
117-510-465 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 15 2,996.99$
117-510-466 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 16 2,996.99$
117-510-467 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 17 3,425.84$
117-510-468 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 18 3,307.49$
117-510-469 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 19 2,658.68$
117-510-470 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 20 2,639.07$
117-510-471 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 21 2,638.00$
117-510-472 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 22 2,636.93$
117-510-473 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 23 2,635.86$
117-510-474 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 24 2,634.80$
117-510-475 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 25 2,992.35$
117-510-476 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 26 2,568.85$
117-510-477 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 27 2,568.85$
117-510-478 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 28 2,568.85$
117-510-479 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 29 2,568.85$
117-510-480 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 30 2,568.85$
117-510-481 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 31 2,568.85$
117-510-482 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 32 2,568.85$
117-510-483 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 33 2,657.61$
117-510-484 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 34 3,348.84$
117-510-485 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 35 4,800.81$
117-510-486 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 36 4,072.86$
117-510-487 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 37 3,261.50$
117-510-488 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 38 2,895.39$
117-510-489 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 39 2,921.05$
117-510-490 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 40 2,639.07$
117-510-491 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 41 3,116.05$
117-510-492 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 42 4,027.59$
117-510-493 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 43 3,000.91$
117-510-494 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 44 2,826.23$
117-510-495 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 45 2,828.37$
117-510-496 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 46 3,006.61$
117-510-497 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 47 2,866.51$
Page 36 of 111
Exhibit D - Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1
117-510-498 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 48 2,822.66$
117-510-499 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 49 3,158.12$
117-510-500 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 50 3,304.63$
117-510-501 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 51 2,824.09$
117-510-502 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 52 3,090.03$
117-510-503 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 53 2,779.89$
117-510-504 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 54 2,994.49$
117-510-505 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 55 2,623.03$
117-510-506 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 56 2,666.88$
117-510-507 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 57 2,666.88$
117-510-508 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 58 2,666.88$
117-510-509 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 59 2,666.88$
117-510-510 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 60 2,666.88$
117-510-511 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 61 2,666.88$
117-510-512 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 62 2,666.88$
117-510-513 Riverhawk Pointe II Phase 1, Lot 63 3,285.38$
494,350.58$ Total Allocated to Lots
Page 37 of 111
Exhibit E - Sorano Heights Phase 1
LID Parcel
No. 4 117510036 LOT 4 OF RECORD SURVEY 1847849 341,576.00$ 34.84 Acres Subdivided into 29 lots
117510600 Sorano Heights, Tract B 248,076.75$
117510601 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 1 2,601.14$
117510602 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 2 2,546.07$
117510603 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 3 2,546.07$
117510604 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 4 2,546.07$
117510605 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 5 2,546.07$
117510606 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 6 2,546.07$
117510607 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 7 2,546.07$
117510608 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 8 2,546.07$
117510609 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 9 2,883.41$
117510610 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 10 2,638.56$
117510611 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 11 4,081.31$
117510612 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 12 16,925.98$
117510613 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 13 5,100.81$
117510614 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 14 3,475.17$
117510615 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 15 2,616.71$
117510616 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 16 2,787.02$
117510617 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 17 2,399.40$
117510618 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 18 2,474.23$
117510619 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 19 3,126.76$
117510620 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 20 2,464.05$
117510621 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 21 2,920.22$
117510622 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 22 2,975.60$
117510623 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 23 2,580.79$
117510624 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 24 3,200.69$
117510625 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 25 2,187.17$
117510626 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 26 2,811.87$
117510627 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 27 2,557.74$
117510628 Sorano Heights, Phase 1 - Lot 28 2,868.14$
341,576.00$ Total Allocated to Lots
Page 38 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council December 30, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: NW Area Sanitary Trunk Sewer Local Improvement District Formation
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution with Exhibits
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: public to relating ______, No. to approve move I Resolution
improvements; declaring its intention to order the improvements of the Northwest Area
Sewer Trunk Main (from Harris Road north to one-quarter mile past Burns Road and
from Burns Road northeast to Broadmoor Blvd) and to create a local improvement
district to assess the cost and expense of carrying out those improvements against the
properties specially benefited thereby; notifying all persons who desire to object to the
improvements to appear and present their objections at a hearing before the City
Council to be held on February 3, 2020; and providing for other properly related
matters.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Estimated Project Cost: $6,879,989; Estimated City Contribution: $969,989; Estimated
LID Contribution: $5,910,000
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Project
The Northwest Area of Pasco has unprecedented potential for development with as
much as 4,600 acres available. The City is working with property owners and
developers in the area to create preliminary plans for providing infrastructure to this
area. The proposed Urban Growth Area (UGA) expansion contemplates significant
growth to occur to the North and West areas of Pasco. Providing sanitary sewer in this
area will help lessen urban sprawl by allowing for more efficient use of land, which in
turn will better support commercial development within the Broadmoor area. This is
Page 39 of 111
also consistent with the Growth Management Act, adopted Council goals and the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
Proposed Process
Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) are a means of assisting benefiting properties in
financing needed capital improvements through the formation of special assessment
districts. Special assessment districts provide the opportunity for improvements to be
financed and paid for over a period of time through assessments on the benefiting
properties.
V. DISCUSSION:
This item was discussed at the February 25, 2019, October 14 2019, and December 9,
2019, Council workshop meetings.
The design and construction of this project is currently estimated to be $5.52 million,
with $1.36 million for financial elements like escrow, guaranty fund, and financing
costs.
Staff has consulted with experts in the LID process and found that an LID is
appropriate for use in this situation. A special benefit analysis will be conducted to
demonstrate that the benefits of the project accrued to the parcels within the proposed
LID boundary exceed the cost of the project and the projected assessments. Therefore,
it is beneficial to move forward with the LID.
The major property owners associated with the proposed LID are supportive of the
project.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution setting a public hearing date of February
3, 2020, for Council consideration on the formation of an LID for the completion of the
Northwest Area Sewer Trunk Main project.
Page 40 of 111
Resolution - 1
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE NORTHWEST
AREA SANITARY TRUNK SEWER (FROM HARRIS ROAD TO ONE-
QUARTER MILE NORTH OF BURNS ROAD) AND TO CREATE A LOCAL
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO ASSESS THE COST AND EXP ENSE OF
CARRYING OUT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY
SPECIALLY BENEFITTED THEREBY; NOTIFYING ALL PERSONS WHO
DESIRE TO OBJECT TO THE IMPROVEMENTS TO APPEAR AND
PRESENT THEIR OBJECTIONS AT A HEARING BEFORE THE CITY
COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON FEBRUARY 3, 2020; AND PROVIDING FOR
OTHER PROPERLY RELATED MATTERS.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, as follows:
Section 1. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, to order
the improvement of the property within the area described in Exhibit A, by the construction of the
Northwest Area Trunk Sewer (from Harris Road to one-quarter mile north of Burns Road). The
improvements consist of full sanitary sewer construction, including site grading, manholes, and
sewer pipe, (collectively, the “Improvements”). The referenced Exhibit A is attached hereto and
by this reference made a part hereof.
All of the foregoing Improvements shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications
prepared by the Public Works Director of the City and may be modified by the City as long as that
modification does not affect the purpose of the improvements.
Section 2. The total estimated cost and expense of the Improvements is declared to be
$6,879,989, of which an estimated $5,910,000 shall be borne by and assessed against the property
specially benefited by the Improvements to be included in a local improvement district to be
established and embracing as nearly as practicable all the property specially benefited by the
Improvements. Actual assessments may vary from estimated assessments as long as they do not
exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value the Improvements add to the property.
Section 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of the adoption of this
resolution and of the date, time and place fixed herein for the public hearing to each owner or
reputed owner of any lot, tract, parcel of land or other property within the proposed local
improvement district by mailing such notice at least fifteen days before the date fixed for public
hearing to the owner or reputed owner of the property as shown on the rolls of the Franklin County
Assessor at the address shown thereon, as required by law.
Page 41 of 111
Resolution - 2
This resolution also shall be published in its entirety in at least two consecutive issues of
the official newspaper of the City, the date of the first publication to be at least 15 days prior to
the date fixed herein for the public hearing.
Section 4. All persons who may desire to object to the Improvements are notified to appear
and present those objections at a hearing before the City Council to be held in the Council
Chambers in the City Hall, 525 N. 3rd Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at 7:00 p.m. on February 3,
2020, which time and place are fixed for hearing all matters relating to the Improvements and all
objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the Improvements. All persons
who object thereto should appear and present their objections at that hearing. Any person who may
desire to file a written protest with the City Council may do so within 30 days after the date of
passage of the ordinance ordering the Improvements in the event the local improvement district is
formed. The written protest should be signed by the property owner and should include the legal
description of the property for which the protest is filed and that protest should be delivered to the
City Clerk.
The Public Works Director is directed to submit to the City Council on or prior to February
3, 2020, all data and information required by law to be submitted.
The foregoing resolution was ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pasco,
Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof this 6th day of January, 2020.
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________ ___________________________
Debra Barham, CMC Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 42 of 111
Resolution - 3
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Pasco, Washington (the “City”), hereby certify as
follows:
1. The attached copy of Resolution No. __________ (the “Resolution”) is a full, true and
correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held
at the regular meeting place thereof on January 6, 2020, as that resolution appears on the minute
book of the City; and the Resolution will be in full force and effect immediately following its
adoption; and
2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the meeting and a
majority of the members voted in the proper manner for the adoption of the Resolution.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6th day of January, 2020.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
_____________________________________
Debra Barham, City Clerk
Page 43 of 111
CITY OF PASCO
BROADMOOR AREA
SEWER LID
EW
S
N
1
1
HLA 2803 River Road
Yakima, WA 98902
509.966.7000
Fax 509.965.3800
www.hlacivil.comEngineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
6
5
4
3
SEGMENT 1SEGMENT 3SEGM
E
N
T
2
BURNS ROAD
I-182 BROADMOOR BLVDDRAFTPage 44 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council December 30, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Northwest Area Trunk Sewer Design – Approval of Professional Services
Agreement with RH2 Engineering
I. REFERENCE(S):
Professional Services Agreement
Preliminary LID Map
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: RH2 with Agreement Services Professional to approve move I the
Engineering, in the amount of $556,668 for the NW Area Sewer Project and further,
authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Professional Services Agreement = $556,668 (This Agenda Item)
Funding for the Professional Services Agreement will be paid for through the NW Area
Sewer Trunk LID and proportionately the City share for the project.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
As previously discussed in the 2020-2025 CIP, this project will extend sanitary sewer,
by means of a sewer trunk line into the Northwest (Broadmoor) Area. This vital
connection to the sanitary sewer system will allow the development in this area to
occur at a density consistent with the City's overall planning and land use objectives for
the area.
The proposed Urban Growth Area (UGA) expansion contemplates significant growth
to occur to the North and West areas of Pasco. Provision of sanitary sewer in this area
lessens urban sprawl by allowing for more efficient use of land, which in turn will
better support commercial development within the Broadmoor and Rd. 68 commercial
corridors. The proposed sanitary sewer trunk has the potential to serve approximately
Page 45 of 111
990 acres of land currently within the city limits, with the abilit y for future extension
into the future urban growth area.
This effort will design the proposed sewer trunk from the recently completed Harris
Road trunk sewer line, northly to a point approximately one-quarter-mile north of
Burns Road (Deseret Road extended). Also contemplated is a secondary sanitary sewer
trunk, which extends from the north-south trunk at Burns Road easterly to Road 100,
the extent and final alignment of this segment will be determined as part of the final
design process.
V. DISCUSSION:
As proposed, the Professional Services Agreement, herein, would provide for RH2
Engineering to complete the sanitary sewer trunk alignment by preparing plans,
specifications, and construction cost estimates. Further, the Professional Services
agreement would task RH2 with Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisitions and easements,
permitting assistance, geotechnical assessments, LID administration, and services
during both bidding and construction.
The proposed Professional Services Agreement is attached. Staff views the Agreement
to be sufficient in scope to complete the work outlined above and finds the costs to be
reasonable. Accordingly, staff recommends approval of the proposed Professional
Services Agreement with RH2 Engineering.
Page 46 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 1 of 9
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer ULID
Agreement No. 19049
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the City of Pasco, a Washington
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City”, and RH2 Engineering, Inc., hereinafter
referred to as “Consultant,” on the _______ day of _________________, 2020.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to have certain services and/or tasks performed as set forth
below requiring specialized skills, training, equipment, and other supportive capabilities; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant represents that it is qualified and possesses sufficient skills,
experience, equipment, and necessary capabilities, including: technical and professional expertise,
when required, to perform the services and/or tasks as set forth in this Agreement upon which the
City is relying.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, and performances
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Scope of Services. The Consultant shall perform such services and accomplish such tasks,
including the furnishing of all labor, materials, facilities and equipment necessary for full
performance thereof, as identified and designated as Consultant’s Responsibilities
throughout this Agreement, and as more particularly described in Scope of Work detailed
in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Project”).
2. Term. This Project shall begin on the execution date listed above and promptly be
completed by 12/31/2020.
3. Compensation and Payment.
3.1 Payment for services provided hereunder shall be made following the performance
of such services. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or
services rendered, and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals
necessary to complete the Project.
3.2 No payment shall be made for any services rendered by the Consultant except for
services identified and set forth in this Agreement except as may be authorized by
a written supplemental agreement approved by the City.
3.3 The City shall pay the Consultant for work performed under this Agreement upon
timely submitted invoices detailing work performed and expenses for which
reimbursement is sought. The City shall approve all invoices before payment is
Page 47 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 2 of 9
issued. Payment shall occur within thirty (30) days of receipt and approval of an
invoice.
3.4 The City shall pay the Consultant for all work performed and expenses incurred
under this Agreement, as follows.
☐ Hourly (Single Rate): $__________ per hour plus actual expenses incurred
as provided under this Agreement, but not to exceed a total of
$____________ without prior written authorization by the City; or
☒ Hourly (Multiple Rate): Such rates as identified on Exhibit B, plus actual
expenses incurred as provided under this Agreement, but not to exceed a
total of $556,668 without the prior written authorization by the City; or
☐ Fixed Sum: A total of $__________________; or
☐ Other: ______________________________________________________
4. Reports and Inspections.
4.1 The Consultant at such times and in such forms as the City may require, shall
furnish to the City such statements, records, studies, surveys, reports, data, and
information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this
Agreement.
4.2 The Consultant shall, at any time during normal business hours and as often as the
City or the Washington State Auditor may reasonably deem necessary, make
available for examination all of its records and data with respect to all matters
covered, directly or indirectly, by this Agreement and shall permit the City, or its
designated authorized representative to audit and inspect other data relating to all
matters covered by this Agreement. The City shall receive a copy of all audit
reports made by the agency or firm as to the Consultant’s activities. The City may,
at its discretion, conduct an audit at its expense, using its own or outside auditors,
of the Consultant’s activities which relate, directly or indirectly, to this Agreement.
Consultant shall be provided a copy of such reports.
4.3 The Consultant, during the term of this Agreement, shall obtain all permits and
registration documents necessary for the performance of its work and for the
execution of services at its own expense, and shall maintain its validity. Upon
request, the Consultant shall deliver to the City copies of these licenses, registration
documents, and permits or proof of their issuance or renewal.
4.4 Consultant shall maintain books, records and documents, which sufficiently and
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of this
Agreement, and shall maintain such accounting procedures and practices as may be
necessary to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement.
Page 48 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 3 of 9
These records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection, review, or
audit as provided above.
4.5 The Consultant shall retain all books, records, documents or other material relevant
to this Agreement for three (3) years after its expiration. Consultant agrees that the
City, or its designee, shall have full access and right to examine any of said
materials at all reasonable times during this period.
5. Ownership and Use of Documents.
5.1 All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data, information, drawings and documents
made, collected, or prepared by the Consultant for performing the services subject
to this Agreement, as well as any final product, collectively referred to as “work
product,” shall be deemed as the exclusive property of the City, including copyright
as secured thereon. Consultant may not use them except in connection with the
performance of the services under this Agreement or with the prior written consent
of the City. Any prior copyrighted materials owned by the Consultant and utilized
in the performance of the services under this Agreement, or embedded in with the
materials, products and services provided thereunder, shall remain the property of
the Consultant subject to a license granted to the City for their continued use of the
products and services provided under this Agreement. Any work product used by
the Consultant in the performance of these services which it deems as
“confidential,” “proprietary,” or a “trade secret” shall be conspicuously designated
as such.
5.2 In the event of Consultant’s default, or in the event that this Agreement is
terminated prior to its completion, the work product of the Consultant, along with
a summary of the services performed to date of default or termination, shall become
the property of the City, and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of services
provided shall be prepared at no additional cost, if the Agreement is terminated
through default by the Consultant. If the Agreement is terminated through
convenience by the City, the City agrees to pay Consultant for the preparation of
the summary of services provided.
6. Public Records.
6.1 Consultant acknowledges that the City is an agency subject to Chapter 42.56 RCW
“Public Records Act.” All preliminary drafts or notes prepared or gathered by the
Consultant, and recommendations of the Consultant are exempt prior to the
acceptance by the City or public citation by the City in connection with City action.
6.2 If the Consultant becomes a custodian of public records of the City and request for
such records is received by the City, the Consultant shall respond to the request by
the City for such records within five (5) business days by either providing the
records, or by identifying in writing the additional time necessary to provide the
Page 49 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 4 of 9
records with a description of the reasons why additional time is needed. Such
additional time shall not exceed twenty (20) business days unless extraordinary
good cause is shown.
6.3 In the event the City receives a public records request for protected work product
of the Consultant within its possession, the City shall, prior to the release of any
protected work product or as a result of a public records request or subpoena,
provide Consultant at least ten (10) business days prior written notice of the pending
release and to reasonably cooperate with any legal action which may be initiated
by the Consultant to enjoin or otherwise prevent such release.
7. Independent Contractor Relationship.
7.1 The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship is created by this
Agreement. The City is interested primarily in the results to be achieved; subject
to the scope of services and the specific requirements of this Agreement, the
implementation of services will lie solely with the discretion of the Consultant. No
agent, employee, officer or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be
an employee, agent, officer, or representative of the City for any purpose, and the
employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits or privileges the
City provides for its employees. The Consultant will be solely and entirely
responsible for its acts and for the acts of its agents, employees, officers,
subcontractors or representatives during the performance of this Agreement.
7.2 In the performance of the services provided in this Agreement, Consultant is an
independent contractor with full authority to control and direct the performance of
the details of the work, however, the results of the work contemplated herein must
meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City’s general rights of
inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof.
7.3 The Consultant shall comply with all State and Federal laws including, but not
limited to:
7.3.1 The definition requirements of RCW 50.04.140 (Employment Security).
7.3.2 RCW 51.08.195 (Industrial Insurance).
7.3.3 Obtain a City of Pasco business license.
7.4 The City may, at its sole discretion, require the Consultant to remove any employee,
agent or servant from employment on this Project who, in the City’s sole discretion,
may be detrimental to the City’s interest.
Page 50 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 5 of 9
8. Indemnification.
8.1 The Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers from any and all claims and causes of
action, including, but not limited to, actions of law or administrative proceedings
for all injuries to persons or damages to property, and all losses, damages, demands,
suits, judgments, including attorney fees, arising out of, or as a result of, or in
connection with the work performed under this Agreement, and caused or
occasioned in whole or in part by reason of errors, negligent acts or omissions of
the Consultant or its subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement, except
for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City, its officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers.
8.2 Should a Court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject
to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily
injuries or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent
negligence of the Consultant, and the City, its officers, employees, agents and
volunteers, the Consultant’s liability and obligation to defend hereunder shall only
be the proportionate extent of the Consultant’s negligence.
8.3 It is further agreed that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the
Consultant’s waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely
for the purposes of this indemnification.
8.4 No liability shall attach to the City by reason of entering into this Agreement except
as expressly provided herein.
8.5 This indemnification shall include damages, penalties and attorney fees sustained
as a result of Consultant’s delayed or failed performance of Section 6 above.
8.6 This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties, and the provisions of this
section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
9. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its
agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
9.1 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types
described below:
9.1.1 Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and
leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office
(ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability
coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual
liability coverage.
Page 51 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 6 of 9
9.1.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence
form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations,
independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The
City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant’s Commercial
General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for
the City.
9.1.3 Workers’ Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance
laws of the State of Washington.
9.1.4 Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession.
9.2 Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following
insurance limits:
9.2.1 Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for
bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident.
9.2.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less
than:
☒ $1,000,000 each occurrence;
☒ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or
☐ $________ each occurrence; and $________ general aggregate
9.2.3 Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than:
☒ $1,000,000 per claim;
☒ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or
☐ $________ per claim; and $________ per policy aggregate limit
9.3 Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed
to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability, Professional
Liability, and Commercial General Liability insurance:
9.3.1 The Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage
maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and
shall not contribute with it.
9.3.2 The Consultant’s insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not
be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice
by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
Page 52 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 7 of 9
9.4 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII.
9.5 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including, but not
necessarily limited to, the additional insured endorsement evidencing the insurance
requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work.
10. Nondiscrimination. In the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant will not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the grounds of race,
creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental
or physical handicap; provided that the prohibition against discrimination in employment
because of handicap shall not apply if the particular disability prevents the proper
performance of the particular worker involved. The Consultant shall ensure that applicants
are employed, and that employees are treated during employment in the performance of
this Agreement without discrimination because of their race, creed, color, national origin,
sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap.
Consultant shall take such action with respect to this Agreement as may be required to
ensure full compliance with local, State and Federal laws prohibiting discrimination in
employment.
11. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company, firm, or person, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement; and that it has not paid
or agreed to pay any company, person or firm, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or
other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement.
12. Assignment and Subcontracting.
12.1 The City has awarded this Agreement to the Consultant due to its unique
qualifications to perform these services. The Consultant shall not assign (or
subcontract other than as specifically identified in Exhibit A) its performance under
this Agreement or any portions of this Agreement without the prior written consent
of the City, which consent must be sought at least thirty (30) days prior to the date
of any proposed assignment.
12.2 Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each
provision of this Agreement including Section 6, Public Records; Section 10,
Nondiscrimination; proper bidding procedures where applicable; and all local, State
and Federal statutes, ordinances and guidelines.
12.3 Any technical or professional service subcontract not listed in this Agreement, must
have prior written approval by the City.
Page 53 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 8 of 9
13. Termination.
13.1 Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any
reason upon giving the other party no less than ten (10) business days written notice
in advance of the effective date of such termination.
13.2 Termination for Cause. If the Consultant fails to perform in the manner called for
in this Agreement, or if the Consultant fails to comply with any other provisions of
this Agreement and fails to correct such noncompliance within five (5) business
days of written notice thereof, the City may terminate this Agreement for cause.
Termination shall be effected by serving a notice of termination on the Consultant
setting forth the manner in which the Consultant is in default. The Consultant will
only be paid for services and expenses complying with the terms of this Agreement,
incurred prior to termination.
14. General Provisions.
14.1 For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
14.2 Notice. Notice provided for in this Agreement shall be sent by:
14.2.1 Personal service upon the Project Administrators; or
14.2.2 Certified mail to the physical address of the parties, or by electronic
transmission to the e-mail addresses designated for the parties below.
14.3 The Project Administrator for the purpose of this Agreement shall be:
14.3.1 For the City: Steve M. Worley, P.E, or his/her designee
Public Works Director
525 North 3rd
PO Box 293
Pasco WA 99301
WorleyS@pasco-wa.gov (e-mail address)
14.3.2 For the Consultant: Paul Cross, PE, or his/her designee
RH2 Engineering, Inc.
114 Columbia Point Dr, Suite C
Richland, WA 99352
pcross@rh2.com (e-mail address)
15. Dispute Resolution.
15.1 This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and entered
into and delivered within the State of Washington and it is agreed by each party
Page 54 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – RH2 Engineering, Inc. Agreement No. 19049
1800076 – Northwest Area Sewer LID Page 9 of 9
hereto that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington.
15.2 In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default, or
interpretation of this Agreement, the Project Administrators, or their designees,
shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the event the dispute
cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be resolved by
arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, with both parties waiving the right
of a jury trial upon trial de novo, with venue placed in Pasco, Franklin County,
Washington. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable
attorney fees and costs as additional award and judgment against the other.
16. Nonwaiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other similar event or
other provision of this Agreement.
17. Integration. This Agreement between the parties consists in its entirety of this document
and any exhibits, schedules or attachments. Any modification of this Agreement or change
order affecting this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties.
18. Authorization. By signature below, each party warrants that they are authorized and
empowered to execute this Agreement binding the City and the Consultant respectively.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date first written above.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON CONSULTANT
Dave Zabell, City Manager Paul Cross – Project Manager
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC, City Attorney
Page 55 of 111
1
12/27/2019 3:04:16 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
EXHIBIT A
Scope of Work
City of Pasco
Northwest Sewer Area Alignment Project
December 2019
Background
The City of Pasco (City) has retained RH2 Engineering, Inc., (RH2) to design a gravity sewer
transmission main to connect the growing Broadmoor area of West Pasco to the existing sewer
system. The City’s preliminary design concepts call for a 30-inch-diameter gravity sewer main with
up to three (3) road crossing through the Franklin County (County) and United States Bureau of
Reclamation (USBR) right-of-way (ROW).
Task 1 – Preliminary Alignment Assessment
Objective: Perform preliminary alignment assessment based upon City contact with willing
landowners, existing utility congestion, regulatory requirements, and City objectives and
preferences.
Approach:
1.1 Confirm the Northwest (NW) sewer basin service area, projected sewer basin flows, and
proposed gravity main alignments, depth, and diameters. Include consideration for future
development plans and loadings as identified in the City’s Broadmoor Master Planning efforts
to the north and west of the NW sewer basin area boundary.
1.2 Prepare figures and comparison matrices for the preferred gravity main alignments (as
identified by the City) and one (1) alternative alignment based on City input, utility
congestion, property owner preferences, rough order of magnitude construction cost
estimates, accessibility, anticipated ROW acquisition and costs, and general feasibility.
1.3 Conduct one (1) site visit to identify and photograph visible existing conditions within and
around the preferred pipe alignment and alternative alignment.
1.4 Attend up to five (5) meetings with the City and property owners to review alternatives and
discuss alignment selection. Prepare meeting agenda and minutes.
Assumptions:
• RH2 will rely upon the accuracy and completeness of data, materials, and information
provided by the City or others in relation to this Scope of Work.
• The project schedule assumes that the City will select an alignment for design based upon
recommendations within five (5) working days of receipt of Task deliverables.
Provided by City:
• Attendance at up to five (5) meetings with RH2 and property owners at City Hall.
Page 56 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
2
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
• Selection of gravity main alignment to be used as the basis for design.
• LiDAR data of the NW Sewer Area performed in 2018.
RH2 Deliverables:
• Up to two (2) figures identifying alignment alternatives with accompanying comparison
matrices in electronic PDF.
• Attendance at up to five (5) meetings with City staff and property owners at City Hall. Provide
meeting agenda and minutes in electronic PDF.
Task 2 – Right-of-Way Acquisition and Easements
Objective: Subcontract and coordinate with Tierra Right-of-Way Services, Ltd., (Tierra) to appraise
and prepare documentation for negotiations and acquisition of easements for lands from up to ten
(10) properties. Subcontract with Rogers Surveying, Inc., P.S. (Rogers) to provide legal descriptions
for up to ten (10) properties.
Approach:
2.1 Subcontract with Rogers to prepare legal descriptions and exhibit maps for up to ten (10)
properties.
2.2 Provide one (1) real estate appraisal for each property from which an interest is to be
acquired, for up to ten (10) properties.
2.3 Subcontract with Tierra to provide acquisition advisory services for up to ten (10) ROW files,
including obtaining preliminary title reports, working with the title company to clear title
encumbrances or making the offer subject to clearing title encumbrances, preparing Offer
Packets and Final Report Packets for each property, obtaining escrow services, and
coordinating closing transactions.
2.4 Prepare legal descriptions and maps for up to ten (10) permanent sewer utility easements.
This subtask will be completed by Rogers.
2.5 Attend up to twenty (20) meetings with up to ten (10) property owners and the City to discuss
acquisitions and projected project impacts.
2.6 Coordinate with up to ten (10) property owners to obtain rights-of-entry (ROEs) for
topographic survey, cultural survey, and geotechnical investigation access. Any effort for
these services in excess of sixty (60) hours is outside of this Scope of Work and will be
negotiated as part of an amended scope of work.
Assumptions:
• ROW acquisition is on the critical path for this project. The project schedule assumes that the
City will review and approve Tierra’s deliverables within five (5) business days of receipt, and
that negotiations will proceed without significant delay such that closing is achieved by June
2020.
Page 57 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
3
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
• The term “properties” shall be understood to mean property that constitutes the “larger
parcel” as described in the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Right-
of-Way Manual.
• All appraisal reports shall be abbreviated or short form (AOS) valuations for simple takings
and detailed (before/after or taking/damages) appraisals for complex takings.
• Tierra will provide written notice to owners of the planned appraisal inspections. The property
owners will be invited to accompany the appraiser on any inspection of their property for
appraisal purposes.
• Special benefits, if any, must be quantified by the appraiser whether or not there are any
compensable damages to the property.
• All ROWs shall be acquired in the name of the City.
• Offers will be made on City letterhead and will include City contact information, acquisition
and relocation brochures, offer-benefit letter, acquisition and relocation summary
statements, conveyance documents, exhibits, a copy of the appraisal, map of acquisition,
instruments of conveyance, and W-9 form (if money is exchanged).
o If the offer is accepted, Tierra will obtain escrow services from a local title company
for permanent acquisitions and coordinate closing transactions between the title
company and the City. All signed Temporary Construction Easements will be forwarded
to the City for processing.
o If a counteroffer is received and accepted, Tierra shall prepare a justification letter
supporting Administrative Settlement for the City’s acquisition file.
o If an acceptable agreement is not reached, Tierra shall prepare a Recommendation for
Condemnation.
• Tierra shall review the Report of Personal Interview for each file. The Report of Personal
Interview must include contact with property owners, owners’ attorneys, and occupants;
efforts to achieve amicable settlements; owners' suggestions for changes in plans; responses
to owners' counterproposals, etc.
• There are no residential or non-residential relocations, or personal property relocations.
• Negotiation services are not included in this Scope of Work.
• The City will perform first contact with property owners and provide contact information to
RH2 to coordinate ROEs.
• Escrow services and title insurance are necessary for permanent acquisitions only. This budget
assumes that there will be five (5) files with permanent easements.
• Temporary Construction Easements will not be recorded.
Page 58 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
4
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
Provided by City:
• The City will provide final review and acceptance of the appraisals.
• The City will perform first contact with affected property owners.
• The City will negotiate with, and establish just compensation for, each property owner and
will provide notification to RH2 and Tierra.
• The City will be responsible for reviewing and signing the offer packets provided by Tierra.
• Attendance at up to twenty (20) meetings with property owners, Tierra, and RH2 staff at City
Hall.
RH2 Deliverables:
• One (1) exhibit map and legal description in electronic format per property for up to ten (10)
properties.
• Up to ten (10) appraisals in electronic format.
• Up to ten (10) Offer Packets for review and signature by the City in electronic PDF.
• Up to ten (10) Final Report Packets for each file for payment and conveyance of title and
recording to the City in electronic PDF.
• Up to ten (10) Recommendations for Condemnation, if applicable, in electronic PDF.
• Attendance at up to twenty (20) meetings with property owners, Tierra, and City staff at City
hall.
Task 3 – Permitting Assistance
Objective: Assist the City with the preparation of necessary documents and permit submittals to
meet local and state requirements with regard to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA),
Washington State Department of Ecology’s (Ecology) jurisdiction over public wastewater
improvements, the County’s ROW permit and encroachment process, and required City permit
processes. Subcontract and coordinate with Cultural Resource Consultants, LLC (CRC) to perform
cultural survey of the proposed project alignment to the extent required by the City and regulatory
agencies with jurisdiction.
Approach:
3.1 Coordinate with CRC to complete cultural survey work. CRC will contact the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) and applicable tribes, perform background research and site
investigation, and prepare a Cultural Resources Assessment report to identify archaeological
and historical resources in accordance with Washington State Department of Archaeology
and Historic Preservation (DAHP) guidelines.
3.2 Collect and review readily available background information related to the project, including
published relevant environmental reports, sensitive areas mapping and data, aerial
photography, and topographic maps. Data collected will be used to inform field
Page 59 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
5
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
investigations, included in permit applications/reports, and used during discussions with
regulatory agency staff.
3.3 Conduct an environmental site investigation to identify, characterize, and delineate
environmental resources at and within 150 feet of the selected sewer alignment. It is
assumed that wetland habitat is associated with the South Columbia Basin Irrigation District
(SCBID) irrigation drainage in the vicinity of the project, and consequently, the proposed sewer
alignment will cross and/or be constructed in proximity to this drainage feature. Field-flag
delineated wetland boundaries for subsequent survey. Complete wetland ratings for
identified wetlands. Compile field data and maps for topographic survey and critical areas
reporting. Coordinate with Rogers to obtain survey of environmental boundaries and data
points. It is assumed that the City will coordinate and obtain ROE access to adjacent parcels
for RH2’s site investigations.
3.4 Prepare a Wetland Detailed Study (WDS) in accordance with Pasco Municipal Code (PMC)
28.16.050 utilizing background information and site-specific data collected during the site
investigation. The WDS will be submitted to the City for permit review purposes. It is assumed
through alternatives analysis and design that impacts to the wetland drainage can be avoided
and minimized, such that no compensatory mitigation will be needed for permanent wetland
fill or excavation. This subtask estimates six (6) hours of RH2 effort to coordinate with the City
regarding avoidance and minimization measures and prepare corresponding language for
inclusion in the WDS.
3.5 Prepare a utility crossing permit application from the SCBID for the USBR crossings, together
with required plan and profile details of pipeline, casing, bore pits, traffic control, and all
other requirements for the crossings. The effort involved in this subtask is not well-defined;
therefore, RH2 has conservatively estimated sixteen (16) hours to coordinate with SCBID. If
additional effort is determined necessary, an amendment to this Scope of Work may be
needed.
3.6 Prepare a draft SEPA Checklist for City staff review in electronic PDF. Based on City staff
comments, finalize the SEPA Checklist and provide to City Planning staff for completion of a
SEPA Determination and subsequent publication.
3.7 Compile and submit construction drawings and specifications for Ecology review and project
approval.
3.8 Attend up to three (3) meetings with the City, Ecology, SCBID and/or USBR to discuss
permitting tasks and progress. Prepare meeting agenda and minutes for each meeting.
3.9 Prepare and submit a Franklin County ROW Permit application to the City for review and final
submittal.
3.10 Prepare and submit a City ROW Permit application to the City for review and final submittal.
Page 60 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
6
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
Assumptions:
• Cultural survey and wetland delineation costs are based on a preliminary alignment and may
change if the alignment is lengthened or significantly altered.
• Cultural survey and wetland delineation costs assume the project area is clear of dense
vegetation such that archaeologists and biologists will be able to complete investigations with
minimal path clearing.
• Cultural costs assume that no more than one (1) unrecorded archaeological site or one (1)
unrecorded historic site will be identified within the project area. If additional sites are found,
it may be necessary to increase the cost of this task. This budget was prepared with the
assumption that no more than twenty (20) shovel test probes would be excavated. If extensive
archaeological deposits are encountered or if additional shovel test probes are warranted
within the project area, it may be necessary to modify this Scope of Work to accommodate
additional investigations for purposes of site identification.
• This Scope of Work does not include effort for mitigation to impacts associated with
archaeological or historic sites.
• If human remains are found within the project area, all cultural field investigations will cease
immediately, proper authorities will be notified, and field investigations will not resume until
applicable state laws are addressed.
• CRC assumes that the City will submit the Cultural Resources Assessment report to DAHP
within fifteen (15) days of receipt of said report for review. CRC cannot be held liable for
reports prepared but not submitted to DAHP in a timely manner. Additional fees may apply
for additional services required as part of DAHP’s review process for reports submitted more
than fifteen (15) days after receipt.
• No cultural resources study can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for
prehistoric sites, historic properties, or traditional cultural properties to be associated with a
project. The information presented in reports is based on experience and professional opinions
derived from the analysis and interpretation of the documents, records, literature, and
information identified and used within the report, and during field investigations. The
conclusions and recommendations presented will apply to the project conditions existing at
the time of the study and those reasonably foreseeable.
• The City will assist RH2 with supplying information required for the SEPA Checklist to the
extent that information is accessible to the City.
• No engineering report will be required for Ecology review and approval.
• The City will submit all final permit applications directly.
• The City will pay all permit and review fees directly.
• It is assumed that impacts to the wetland drainage and/or other critical areas will be avoided
and minimized. As such, this Scope of Work does not include development of compensatory
Page 61 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
7
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
mitigation plans. Should it be necessary, mitigation design services will be addressed in an
amendment to this Scope of Work.
• No federal funds are involved in the project. No federal permitting, federal biological
assessments or evaluations, or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permitting, or coordination will
be involved. This Scope of Work assumes that the USBR crossing will not trigger requirements
of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). If that is not the case, additional permitting
may be required, which would be addressed through an amendment to this Scope of Work.
• Archaeological monitoring, more detailed scientific assessment, or other requirements
imposed as part of the permit approval process will require an additional authorization and a
modification to this Scope of Work.
• Permitting-related work will be conducted on a time and expense basis with the goal that the
required permitting can be accomplished within the proposed permitting budget on the
attached Fee Estimate.
• RH2 is not responsible for site safety, nor for directing Rogers in collection of survey data.
• RH2 cannot warrant or guarantee any agency’s approval or response time.
• RH2 will rely on the accuracy and completeness of data, materials, and information provided
or generated by the City or others in relation to this Scope of Work.
Provided by City:
• Payment of all permit application fees.
• Assistance with completion of permit applications and coordination with agency staff, as
needed.
• Review and comment on draft permit applications prior to submittal.
• Determination and publication elements of permit applications.
RH2 Deliverables:
• One (1) Cultural Resources Assessment report in electronic PDF.
• One (1) Wetland Detailed Study in electronic PDF.
• One (1) completed SCBID/USBR utility crossing application in electronic PDF.
• One (1) completed draft and final SEPA checklist in electronic PDF.
• One (1) completed County ROW permit in electronic PDF format.
• One (1) completed City ROW Permit in electronic PDF format.
• Attendance at up to three (3) meetings with agency and City staff. Prepare meeting agendas
and minutes for each meeting in electronic PDF.
Page 62 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
8
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
Task 4 – Geotechnical Assessment
Objective: Subcontract and coordinate with Shannon & Wilson, Inc., (S&W) to perform geotechnical
engineering services to provide design and construction recommendations for the project segments
through the sand drifts, irrigation ponds, and black sand areas.
Approach:
4.1 Perform geotechnical assessment (S&W): perform utility locates; obtain landowner approval
for drilling access (as required); complete drilling fieldwork and observation; obtain
laboratory analysis of soil samples for moisture content, particle size distribution, and
corrosion potential; perform engineering analyses; and prepare geotechnical engineering
report that summarizes observations, explorations, analyses, and design and construction
recommendations.
4.2 Support S&W field work, review draft geotechnical report, support field activities and
communication with the City.
Assumptions:
• The geotechnical engineering report will include exploration logs and a site exploration plan,
interpreted soil classifications, groundwater depth, if encountered, utility trenching
recommendations, trenchless alternatives and recommendations, including relative feasibility
and risks of different alternative methods, and County or SCBID specific requirements for the
selected alternative, excavation and shoring recommendations for launching and receiving
pits, geotechnical instrumentation recommendations for monitoring the performance and
potential settlement and heave above the trenchless installation, general grading
recommendations, and wet weather construction considerations.
• Boring site accessibility at time of investigation will affect selection of tracked-rig or truck-
mounted drill rig.
• Most drilling will be completed on private property, and a private utility locator will be
subcontracted by S&W to locate underground utilities.
• No soil contamination will be encountered at the site.
• The soil cuttings (spoils) will spread around on drilling sites.
RH2 Deliverables:
• One (1) draft and one (1) final geotechnical report in electronic PDF.
Task 5 – Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
Objective: Prepare 30-percent, 60-percent, agency review, and bid-ready submittal packages with
construction drawings, specifications (post 60-percent only), and cost estimates for the proposed
improvements. Subcontract and coordinate with Rogers to obtain a topographic survey of the
preferred alignment and adjacent property boundaries.
Page 63 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
9
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
Approach:
5.1 Subcontract with Rogers to perform topographic survey of the selected sewer main
alignment.
5.2 Assist the City with potholing of existing utility crossings by identifying required locations and
supplying coordinates/exhibits.
5.3 Incorporate topographic survey, along with City utility locates, City input, pothole data, and
available record data, to prepare base drawing.
5.4 Prepare cover sheet, general notes, and legends; three (3) sheets total.
5.5 Prepare 30-percent sewer plan and profile sheets and details; twenty-five (25) sheets total.
5.6 Prepare 30-percent cost estimate.
5.7 Perform hydraulic calculations and prepare technical memorandum to document design
assumptions, basis, and methodology.
5.8 Prepare 60-percent technical specifications based on RH2’s modified WSDOT format.
5.9 Incorporate review comments and prepare 60-percent civil sheets and details, including
sewer plans and profiles, and horizontal control, demolition, restoration, and traffic control
plans and details; fifty (50) sheets total.
5.10 Prepare 60-percent cost estimate.
5.11 Provide in-house quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) review of 60-percent plans,
specifications, and estimate.
5.12 Incorporate review comments and prepare agency review technical specifications based on
RH2’s modified WSDOT format.
5.13 Incorporate review comments and prepare agency review plans.
5.14 Prepare final cost estimate.
5.15 Incorporate agency review comments and prepare bid-ready plans and specifications for
bidding.
5.16 Attend up to three (3) meetings with the City to discuss the plans, specifications, and estimate
at milestone submittals (30-percent, 60-percent, and agency review). Prepare meeting
agenda and minutes for each meeting.
Assumptions:
• The design will utilize City standard details and City general contractual conditions and forms
to the extent applicable.
• The design does not include additional provisions for other utilities. If additional utilities are
added to this Scope of Work, an amendment will need to be mutually determined between
the City and RH2.
Page 64 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
10
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
• No flagging or traffic control will be required to obtain the required survey data.
• Upon reviewing information, materials, or data provided by others in relation to this project,
RH2 will coordinate with the City to identify missing or incomplete information deemed
necessary to complete the work. Any work outside of this Scope of Work will be negotiated as
part of an amended scope of work.
Provided by City:
• Reviews and comments on the 30-percent, 60-percent, and agency review plans,
specifications, and estimates. The project schedule assumes that City will complete reviews
within five (5) business days of receipt.
RH2 Deliverables:
• One (1) topographic survey in electronic (PDF and AutoCAD) formats.
• One (1) technical memorandum in electronic PDF documenting design decisions.
• One (1) full-size set each of 30-percent, 60-percent, agency review, and bid-ready design
drawings in electronic format.
• One (1) set each of 60-percent, agency review, and bid-ready technical specifications in
electronic format.
• One (1) engineer’s estimate each of construction costs at 30-percent, 60-percent, and bid-
ready design in electronic format.
• Attendance at up to three (3) meetings with agency and City staff. Prepare meeting agendas
and minutes for each meeting in electronic PDF.
Task 6 – LID Process and Appraisals
Objective: Prepare a preliminary assessment map and assessment roll and hold an informal survey
to gauge property owner support of the LID (Local Improvement District). Assist the City with
development of draft resolutions, public hearings, and City Council presentations.
Approach:
6.1 Prepare a preliminary assessment map and assessment roll based upon a combination of
front footage, parcel area, and per property within the LID for initial discussion.
6.2 Meet with the City staff to discuss and compare methodology and decide on preliminary LID
assessment approach.
6.3 Adjust the preliminary assessment map and assessment roll based upon appraisals and
feedback from LID participants.
6.4 Assist the City with development of draft resolutions and attend public hearings and City
Council presentations.
Page 65 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
11
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
6.5 Upon completion of construction, assist with the preparation of the final assessment roll and
prepare the roll for City Council action and filing.
Assumptions:
• The City will contract and coordinate directly with an appraisal firm to obtain pre- and post-
process, market-based property values of adjacent property boundaries benefiting from the
improvements.
• RH2 will attend up to three (3) public hearings and three (3) City Council presentations related
to subtask 6.4.
Provided by City:
• Pre- and post-process, market-based property values of adjacent properties benefiting from
the improvements.
• Attendance at one (1) meeting to discuss LID methodology and approach.
• Attendance at up to three (3) public hearings and three (3) City Council presentations.
RH2 Deliverables:
• Attendance at one (1) meeting to discuss LID methodology and approach.
• Attendance at up to three (3) public hearings and three (3) City Council presentations.
• Preliminary and final assessment rolls and maps in electronic format (Excel and PDF).
Task 7 – Services During Bidding
Objective: Provide engineering assistance throughout the bidding phase to prepare required
documentation and respond to contractor questions.
Approach:
7.1 Prepare bid documents in electronic PDF. Provide PDF to the City and submit bid package to
online plan center (i.e., QuestCDN).
7.2 Prepare advertisement for bids, contact potential bidders, and coordinate the timing and
placement of the bid advertisement with the City. The City will submit the advertisement to
the appropriate publications, and directly pay for the advertisements.
7.3 Respond to contractor and supplier questions during bidding, review product prequalification
requirements, and document responses to the file.
7.4 Prepare up to three (3) addenda when determined necessary to clarify, revise, or change
construction plans, technical specifications, or project conditions during the bidding process.
7.5 Attend one (1) site visit with prospective bidders and the City.
7.6 Review bids and assist the City with the evaluation of the qualifications and references for
the apparent low bidder. The City will administer the bid opening and prepare the bid
Page 66 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
12
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
tabulation to verify total bid prices. The City will prepare and issue the project award
recommendation letter.
Assumptions: Because services during bidding can vary in nature, RH2 will perform Task 7 services as
requested up to the amount included in the attached Fee Estimate. If needed, additional work will be
mutually determined by the City and RH2.
Provided by City:
• City to submit and pay for the advertisement to the appropriate publications.
RH2 Deliverables:
• One (1) advertisement for bid in electronic PDF.
• Written responses to vendor and bidder questions during the advertisement phase,
submitted to the City in electronic PDF or electronic mail.
• Up to three (3) addenda in electronic PDF.
• Reference check of lowest bidder.
Task 8 – Project Management Services
Objective: Prepare and update project schedule. Review and update project files and budget
progress.
Approach:
8.1 Prepare a project schedule and update monthly for up to nine (9) months (does not include
construction).
8.2 Review and update project files and budget progress monthly for up to nine (9) months.
Assumptions: It is assumed that the City, agencies, property owners, subconsultants, and other
stakeholders outside of RH2’s control or influence will approach the project with good faith and fair
dealings, and that coordination and communications above and beyond those reasonably expected
of a similarly sized project will not be required.
RH2 Deliverables:
• Monthly project schedule in electronic PDF.
• Electronic budget invoices or updates monthly for up to nine (9) months.
Task 9 – Services During Construction (Limited)
Objective: Provide services during project construction to support the City. As the engineer of record,
RH2 will perform at least one (1) site visit for observation of construction progress. While not on-
site, RH2 will work with the City and its designated utility and special inspector to respond to
Page 67 of 111
City of Pasco Exhibit A
Northwest Area Sewer Alignment Project Scope of Work
13
12/27/19 3:04 PM Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_SOW_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.docx
technical questions and issues. It is anticipated the City will take the lead in inspection and
construction contract administration and will handle day-to-day responsibilities.
Approach:
9.1 Assist the City for a maximum of one hundred twenty (120) hours to perform on-site
observation and respond to contractor’s requests for information (RFIs) or change orders.
Assumptions: It is assumed that the City will provide most services during construction. If the City
determines it needs technical support from RH2, a maximum of one hundred twenty (120) hours to
respond to contractor questions, observe construction activities, observe special inspections, or assist
with change orders will be provided in this Scope of Work and Fee Estimate. Effort for these services
in excess of one hundred twenty (120) hours are outside of this Scope of Work and will be negotiated
as part of an amended scope of work. RH2 is not responsible for site safety or for directing the
contractor in their work.
RH2 Deliverables:
• Applicable field observation reports and documentation in electronic PDF.
Additional Services
A more detailed cultural evaluation of specific properties within the NW Sewer Area basin may be
provided by a subconsultant if requested by the City.
A topographic survey resulting in 1-foot contour data of specific properties within the NW Sewer
Area basin may be provided by a subconsultant if requested by the City.
Effort for these services are outside of this Scope of Work and will be negotiated as part of an
amended scope of work.
Project Schedule
RH2 will commence with design and permitting work upon notice to proceed from the City.
It is anticipated that LID process and preliminary assessment roll will be approved by late August
2020, that bidding will occur in September 2020, and that construction will commence before the
end of October 2020. The schedule is contingent on finalizing the preferred alignment within three
(3) months of notice to proceed.
Page 68 of 111
EXHIBIT BFee EstimateCity of PascoNorthwest Sewer Area Alignment ProjectDec-19DescriptionTotal HoursTotal Labor Total Subconsultant Total Expense Total CostClassificationTask 1Preliminary Alignment Assessment25842,914$ -$ 4,729$ 47,643$ 1.1Confirm basin properties12420,118$ -$ 2,428$ 22,546$ 1.2Prepare alignment alternative matrices, figures, and costs7011,240$ -$ 1,271$ 12,511$ 1.3Conduct 1 site vist to view alignments142,406$ -$ 276$ 2,682$ 1.4Attend up to 5 meetings to discuss alignments and alternatives509,150$ -$ 753$ 9,903$ Task 2Right-of-way Acquisition and Easements22643,388$ 53,258$ 1,766$ 98,412$ 2.1Prepare legal descriptions and exhibit maps for 10 properties204,204$ 4,025$ 133$ 8,362$ 2.2Provide appraisal for 10 properties245,144$ 46,358$ 156$ 51,658$ 2.3Provide acquisition services for 10 right-of-way files102,120$ -$ 53$ 2,173$ 2.4Attend up to 20 meetings with property owners and City7815,094$ -$ 638$ 15,732$ 2.5Subcontract with Rogers for easement documentation264,402$ 2,875$ 385$ 7,662$ 2.6Coordinate with property owners to obtain ROEs6812,424$ -$ 401$ 12,825$ Task 3Permitting Assistance17528,291$ 11,011$ 1,755$ 41,057$ 3.1Prepare Cultural Resources Assessment4823$ 9,286$ 21$ 10,131$ 3.2Collect and review background information81,282$ -$ 128$ 1,410$ 3.3Conduct environmental site investigation253,886$ 1,725$ 204$ 5,815$ 3.4Prepare Wetland Detailed Study385,852$ -$ 295$ 6,147$ 3.5Prepare SCBID utility crossing permit application162,494$ -$ 276$ 2,770$ 3.6Prepare draft SEPA checklist for City review243,594$ -$ 146$ 3,740$ 3.7Finalize SEPA checklist and provide to City for completion101,674$ -$ 70$ 1,744$ 3.8Prepare and submit materials for Ecology review142,254$ -$ 270$ 2,524$ 3.9Attend meetings with City, Ecology, SCBID, USBR203,920$ -$ 185$ 4,105$ 3.10Prepare Franklin County ROW Permit application81,256$ -$ 80$ 1,336$ 3.11Prepare City ROW Permit application81,256$ -$ 80$ 1,336$ Task 4Geotechnical Assessment254,983$ 60,456$ 220$ 65,659$ 4.1Perform geotechnical assessment in field and report findings61,300$ 60,456$ 78$ 61,833$ 4.2Support geotechnical assessment field work193,683$ -$ 143$ 3,826$ Task 5Plans, Specifications, and Estimates1237192,832$ 11,500$ 26,507$ 230,839$ 5.1Subcontract with Rogers for topographic survey5802$ 11,500$ 75$ 12,377$ 5.2Assist with potholing and incorporate into base drawings4742$ -$ 74$ 816$ Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_FEE_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.xlsx12/27/2019 4:31 PMPage 69 of 111
DescriptionTotal HoursTotal Labor Total Subconsultant Total Expense Total CostClassification5.3Incorporate format of City-provided survey into base drawings6968$ -$ 107$ 1,075$ 5.4Prepare cover, general notes, and legends284,240$ -$ 629$ 4,869$ 5.5Prepare 30-percent plan and profile sheets28843,968$ -$ 6,434$ 50,402$ 5.6Prepare 30-percent cost estimate325,440$ -$ 521$ 5,961$ 5.7Calculate design loadings and memorialize design decisions366,076$ -$ 627$ 6,703$ 5.8Prepare 60-percent specifications6410,880$ -$ 1,070$ 11,950$ 5.9Prepare 60-percent plan and profile sheets27240,832$ -$ 6,356$ 47,188$ 5.10Prepare 60-percent cost estimate325,440$ -$ 521$ 5,961$ 5.11Provide in-house review of plans, specifications, and estimate244,782$ -$ 285$ 5,067$ 5.12Incorporate in-house review comments426,360$ -$ 957$ 7,317$ 5.13Prepare agency review plans and specifications28842,160$ -$ 7,189$ 49,349$ 5.14Prepare bid-ready cost estimate121,936$ -$ 241$ 2,177$ 5.15Incorporate agency review comments and prepare documents for bidding7211,310$ -$ 1,108$ 12,418$ 5.16Attend up to 3 meetings with City staff326,896$ -$ 316$ 7,212$ Task 6LID Process and Appraisals17029,590$ -$ 2,999$ 32,589$ 6.1Prepare preliminary assessment roll488,472$ -$ 789$ 9,261$ 6.2Meet with City to discuss LID methodology and approach81,724$ -$ 43$ 1,767$ 6.3Adjust assessment roll and maps345,910$ -$ 533$ 6,443$ 6.4Draft resolutions, attend public hearings, attend City Council meetings366,440$ -$ 1,073$ 7,513$ 6.5Prepare final assessment roll447,044$ -$ 561$ 7,605$ Task 7Services During Bidding7511,940$ -$ 1,080$ 13,020$ 7.1Prepare bid documents and submit to online plan center4680$ -$ 72$ 752$ 7.2Prepare bid advertisement and coordinate ad timing with City2392$ -$ 10$ 402$ 7.3Respond to contractor and supplier questions183,190$ -$ 272$ 3,462$ 7.4Prepare up to 3 addenda334,849$ -$ 479$ 5,328$ 7.5Attend 1 site visit during bidding91,725$ -$ 137$ 1,862$ 7.6Review bids and evaluate low bidder references91,104$ -$ 110$ 1,214$ Task 8Project Management Services275,643$ -$ 196$ 5,839$ 8.1Maintain schedule for 9 months91,764$ -$ 72$ 1,836$ 8.2Update project files and budget for 9 months183,879$ -$ 124$ 4,003$ Task 9Services During Construction (Limited)12019,360$ -$ 2,250$ 21,610$ 9.1Perform on-site observation and respond to contractor’s requests12019,360$ -$ 2,250$ 21,610$ Subtotal Northwest Sewer Area Alignment Project Tasks2313378,941$ 136,225$ 41,502$ 556,668$ PROJECT TOTAL2313378,941$ 136,225$ 41,502$ 556,668$ Z:\NewBusiness\Proposal\PSC\20191101_PSC_M190158_NW Sewer Area\Contract\PSA_FEE_PSC_NW Sewer Area Alignment Project.xlsx12/27/2019 4:31 PMPage 70 of 111
RATE LIST RATE UNIT
Professional I $144 $/hr
Professional II $157 $/hr
Professional III $171 $/hr
Professional IV $184 $/hr
Professional V $196 $/hr
Professional VI $212 $/hr
Professional VII $227 $/hr
Professional VIII $235 $/hr
Professional IX $235 $/hr
Control Specialist I $130 $/hr
Control Specialist II $141 $/hr
Control Specialist III $155 $/hr
Control Specialist IV $168 $/hr
Control Specialist V $178 $/hr
Control Specialist VI $191 $/hr
Control Specialist VII $206 $/hr
Control Specialist VIII $214 $/hr
Technician I $106 $/hr
Technician II $118 $/hr
Technician III $135 $/hr
Technician IV $145 $/hr
Technician V $157 $/hr
Technician VI $172 $/hr
Technician VII $187 $/hr
Technician VIII $196 $/hr
Administrative I $72 $/hr
Administrative II $83 $/hr
Administrative III $98 $/hr
Administrative IV $118 $/hr
Administrative V $138 $/hr
CAD/GIS System $27.50 $/hr
CAD Plots - Half Size $2.50 price per plot
CAD Plots - Full Size $10.00 price per plot
CAD Plots - Large $25.00 price per plot
Copies (bw) 8.5" X 11"$0.09 price per copy
Copies (bw) 8.5" X 14"$0.14 price per copy
Copies (bw) 11" X 17"$0.20 price per copy
Copies (color) 8.5" X 11"$0.90 price per copy
Copies (color) 8.5" X 14"$1.20 price per copy
Copies (color) 11" X 17"$2.00 price per copy
Technology Charge 2.50%% of Direct Labor
Mileage $0.58
price per mile
(or Current IRS Rate)
Subconsultants 15%Cost +
Outside Services at cost
EXHIBIT C
RH2 ENGINEERING, INC.
2020 SCHEDULE OF RATES AND CHARGES
Rates listed are adjusted annually.
Page 71 of 111
CITY OF PASCO
BROADMOOR AREA
SEWER LID
EW
S
N
1
1
HLA 2803 River Road
Yakima, WA 98902
509.966.7000
Fax 509.965.3800
www.hlacivil.comEngineering and Land Surveying, Inc.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
6
5
4
3
SEGMENT 1SEGMENT 3SEGM
E
N
T
2
BURNS ROAD
I-182 BROADMOOR BLVDDRAFTPage 72 of 111
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council December 30, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 1/6/20
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Murraysmith for the Wastewater
Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements - Phase 1
I. REFERENCE(S):
Professional Services Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement for Wastewater
Treatment Plant (WWTP) Improvements - Phase 1 with Murraysmith and further,
authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Agreement total: Not to exceed $2,321,567.00
Funding:
Revenue Bond and/or WA Department of Ecology Water Quality Loan (application
submitted): $2,321,567.00
2019-2020 Biennial Budget Authorized: $2,500,000.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Wastewater Treatment Plan (WWTP) Facility Plan was prepared by Murraysmith
and approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) in August o f
2019. This plan identified existing and future WWTP deficiencies through the year
2040 and developed a plan to address them, ensuring the facility has adequate
treatment capacity for the foreseeable future. The currently adopted Capital
Improvement Plan and 2019-2020 budget were in part developed from the
aforementioned Facility Plan.
Contemplated WWTP upgrades include the replacement of components that have
surpassed their useful life and the addition of capacity improvements to accommodate
Page 73 of 111
current loading and anticipated growth.
The initial improvements proposed to the WWTP involve addressing short -term
capacity and operational needs and improving the efficiency of design execution.
Qualifications for Request a frCity the 2019, August In issued consulting om
engineering firms for the design of the first two phases of work as identified in the
approved Facility Plan. In September 2019, Statements of Qualifications were received
from five firms, four of which were subsequently interviewed. The selection committee
found Murraysmith to be the most qualified consultant and negotiated the scope and
fee for the design of Phase I of the improvements.
Phase I of the proposed WWTP improvements focuses on secondary treatment
upgrades/expansion and outfall replacement, along with plant electrical upgrades.
Subconsultants characterization, geotechnical investigation: will in assist site
topographic survey, archaeological investigation, among others. Hydraulic modeling
for liquid and solids streams and right-of-way acquisition are included in the scope of
work, as well. Phase I improvements have an estimated project cost of $21M.
V. DISCUSSION:
Through this agreement, Murraysmith will provide design services and bid assistance
for Phase I improvements to the WWTP. The scope of work includes sub-consultant
work for topographical survey, geotechnical exploration, and hydraulic modeling,
amongst others. The current schedule provides for approval of final design by Ecology
in December of 2020; however, that could lessen or extend depending on several
variables.
Staff recommends approval of the Professional Services Agreement with Murraysmith,
for phase 1 of the project only, in an amount not to exceed $2,321,567.00.
Page 74 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 1 of 9
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1
Agreement No. 19048
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the City of Pasco, a Washington
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City”, and Murraysmith, hereinafter referred to
as “Consultant,” on the _______ day of _________________, 2020.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to have certain services and/or tasks performed as set forth
below requiring specialized skills, training, equipment, and other supportive capabilities; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant represents that it is qualified and possesses sufficient skills,
experience, equipment, and necessary capabilities, including: technical and professional expertise,
when required, to perform the services and/or tasks as set forth in this Agreement upon which the
City is relying.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, and performances
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Washington State Department of Ecology – Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund
Engineering Services Insert. The Consultant shall comply with all clauses incorporated
within the attached insert detailed in Exhibit A. For clarification the Department of
Ecology refers to the “Consultant” as “Contractor.” In the event of conflict within the
contract these clauses shall take precedence.
Scope of Services. The Consultant shall perform such services and accomplish such tasks,
including the furnishing of all labor, materials, facilities and equipment necessary for full
performance thereof, as identified and designated as Consultant’s Responsibilities
throughout this Agreement, and as more particularly described in Scope of Work detailed
in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the “Project”).
2. Term. This Project shall begin on the execution date listed above and promptly be
completed by 12/31/2021.
3. Compensation and Payment.
3.1 Payment for services provided hereunder shall be made following the performance
of such services. Such payment shall be full compensation for work performed or
services rendered, and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and incidentals
necessary to complete the Project.
Page 75 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 2 of 9
3.2 No payment shall be made for any services rendered by the Consultant except for
services identified and set forth in this Agreement except as may be authorized by
a written supplemental agreement approved by the City.
3.3 The City shall pay the Consultant for work performed under this Agreement upon
timely submitted invoices detailing work performed and expenses for which
reimbursement is sought. The City shall approve all invoices before payment is
issued. Payment shall occur within thirty (30) days of receipt and approval of an
invoice.
3.4 The City shall pay the Consultant for all work performed and expenses incurred
under this Agreement, as follows.
☒ Hourly (Multiple Rate): Such rates as identified on Exhibit C, plus actual
expenses incurred as provided under this Agreement, but not to exceed a
total of $2,321,567.00 without the prior written authorization by the City.
Consultant’s 2020 Schedule of Charges is also attached within the rates
identified.
4. Reports and Inspections.
4.1 The Consultant at such times and in such forms as the City may require, shall
furnish to the City such statements, records, studies, surveys, reports, data, and
information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this
Agreement.
4.2 The Consultant shall, at any time during normal business hours and as often as the
City or the Washington State Auditor may reasonably deem necessary, make
available for examination all of its records and data with respect to all matters
covered, directly or indirectly, by this Agreement and shall permit the City, or its
designated authorized representative to audit and inspect other data relating to all
matters covered by this Agreement. The City shall receive a copy of all audit
reports made by the agency or firm as to the Consultant’s activities. The City may,
at its discretion, conduct an audit at its expense, using its own or outside auditors,
of the Consultant’s activities which relate, directly or indirectly, to this Agreement.
Consultant shall be provided a copy of such reports.
4.3 The Consultant, during the term of this Agreement, shall obtain all permits and
registration documents necessary for the performance of its work and for the
execution of services at its own expense, and shall maintain its validity. Upon
request, the Consultant shall deliver to the City copies of these licenses, registration
documents, and permits or proof of their issuance or renewal.
4.4 Consultant shall maintain books, records and documents, which sufficiently and
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of this
Agreement, and shall maintain such accounting procedures and practices as may be
Page 76 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 3 of 9
necessary to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this Agreement.
These records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection, review, or
audit as provided above.
4.5 The Consultant shall retain all books, records, documents or other material relevant
to this Agreement for three (3) years after its expiration. Consultant agrees that the
City, or its designee, shall have full access and right to examine any of said
materials at all reasonable times during this period.
5. Ownership and Use of Documents.
5.1 All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data, information, drawings and documents
made, collected, or prepared by the Consultant for performing the services subject
to this Agreement, as well as any final product, collectively referred to as “work
product,” shall be deemed as the exclusive property of the City, including copyright
as secured thereon. Consultant may not use them except in connection with the
performance of the services under this Agreement or with the prior written consent
of the City. Any prior copyrighted materials owned by the Consultant and utilized
in the performance of the services under this Agreement, or embedded in with the
materials, products and services provided thereunder, shall remain the property of
the Consultant subject to a license granted to the City for their continued use of the
products and services provided under this Agreement. Any work product used by
the Consultant in the performance of these services which it deems as
“confidential,” “proprietary,” or a “trade secret” shall be conspicuously designated
as such. Any reuse of such work product outside the scope of work for which it
was developed, or any substantive alteration, without Consultant’s review and
approval, shall be at the City’s sole risk.
5.2 In the event of Consultant’s default, or in the event that this Agreement is
terminated prior to its completion, the work product of the Consultant, along with
a summary of the services performed to date of default or termination, shall become
the property of the City, and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of services
provided shall be prepared at no additional cost, if the Agreement is terminated
through default by the Consultant. If the Agreement is terminated through
convenience by the City, the City agrees to pay Consultant for the preparation of
the summary of services provided.
6. Public Records.
6.1 Consultant acknowledges that the City is an agency subject to Chapter 42.56 RCW
“Public Records Act.” All preliminary drafts or notes prepared or gathered by the
Consultant, and recommendations of the Consultant are exempt prior to the
acceptance by the City or public citation by the City in connection with City action.
Page 77 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 4 of 9
6.2 If the Consultant becomes a custodian of public records of the City and request for
such records is received by the City, the Consultant shall respond to the request by
the City for such records within five (5) business days by either providing the
records, or by identifying in writing the additional time necessary to provide the
records with a description of the reasons why additional time is needed. Such
additional time shall not exceed twenty (20) business days unless extraordinary
good cause is shown.
6.3 In the event the City receives a public records request for protected work product
of the Consultant within its possession, the City shall, prior to the release of any
protected work product or as a result of a public records request or subpoena,
provide Consultant at least ten (10) business days prior written notice of the pending
release and to reasonably cooperate with any legal action which may be initiated
by the Consultant to enjoin or otherwise prevent such release.
7. Independent Contractor Relationship.
7.1 The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship is created by this
Agreement. The City is interested primarily in the results to be achieved; subject
to the scope of services and the specific requirements of this Agreement, the
implementation of services will lie solely with the discretion of the Consultant. No
agent, employee, officer or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to be
an employee, agent, officer, or representative of the City for any purpose, and the
employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits or privileges the
City provides for its employees. The Consultant will be solely and entirely
responsible for its acts and for the acts of its agents, employees, officers,
subcontractors or representatives during the performance of this Agreement.
7.2 In the performance of the services provided in this Agreement, Consultant is an
independent contractor with full authority to control and direct the performance of
the details of the work, however, the results of the work contemplated herein must
meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City’s general rights of
inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof.
7.3 The Consultant shall comply with all State and Federal laws including, but not
limited to:
7.3.1 The definition requirements of RCW 50.04.140 (Employment Security).
7.3.2 RCW 51.08.195 (Industrial Insurance).
7.3.3 Obtain a City of Pasco business license.
7.4 The City may, at its sole discretion, require the Consultant to remove any employee,
agent or servant from employment on this Project who, in the City’s sole discretion,
may be detrimental to the City’s interest.
Page 78 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 5 of 9
8. Indemnification.
8.1 The Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers from any and all claims and causes of
action, including, but not limited to, actions of law or administrative proceedings
for all injuries to persons or damages to property, and all losses, damages, demands,
suits, judgments, including attorney fees, arising out of, or as a result of, or in
connection with the work performed under this Agreement, and caused or
occasioned in whole or in part by reason of errors, negligent acts or omissions of
the Consultant or its subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement, except
for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City, its officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers.
8.2 Should a Court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject
to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily
injuries or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent
negligence of the Consultant, and the City, its officers, employees, agents and
volunteers, the Consultant’s liability and obligation to defend hereunder shall only
be the proportionate extent of the Consultant’s negligence.
8.3 It is further agreed that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the
Consultant’s waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely
for the purposes of this indemnification.
8.4 No liability shall attach to the City by reason of entering into this Agreement except
as expressly provided herein.
8.5 This indemnification shall include damages, penalties and attorney fees sustained
as a result of Consultant’s delayed or failed performance of Section 6 above.
8.6 This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties, and the provisions of this
section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
9. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement,
insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its
agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
9.1 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types
described below:
9.1.1 Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non-owned, hired and
leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office
(ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability
coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual
liability coverage.
Page 79 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 6 of 9
9.1.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence
form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations,
independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The
City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant’s Commercial
General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for
the City.
9.1.3 Workers’ Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance
laws of the State of Washington.
9.1.4 Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession.
9.2 Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following
insurance limits:
9.2.1 Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for
bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident.
9.2.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less
than:
☒ $1,000,000 each occurrence;
☒ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or
☐ $________ each occurrence; and $________ general aggregate
9.2.3 Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than:
☒ $1,000,000 per claim;
☒ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or
☐ $________ per claim; and $________ per policy aggregate limit
9.3 Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed
to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability, Professional
Liability, and Commercial General Liability insurance:
9.3.1 The Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects
the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool coverage
maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and
shall not contribute with it.
9.3.2 The Consultant’s insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not
be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice
by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
9.4 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current
A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII.
Page 80 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 7 of 9
9.5 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including, but not
necessarily limited to, the additional insured endorsement evidencing the insurance
requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work.
10. Nondiscrimination. In the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant will not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the grounds of race,
creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental
or physical handicap; provided that the prohibition against discrimination in employment
because of handicap shall not apply if the particular disability prevents the proper
performance of the particular worker involved. The Consultant shall ensure that applicants
are employed, and that employees are treated during employment in the performan ce of
this Agreement without discrimination because of their race, creed, color, national origin,
sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap.
Consultant shall take such action with respect to this Agreement as may be required to
ensure full compliance with local, State and Federal laws prohibiting discrimination in
employment.
11. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company, firm, or person, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement; and that it has not paid
or agreed to pay any company, person or firm, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or
other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement.
12. Assignment and Subcontracting.
12.1 The City has awarded this Agreement to the Consultant due to its unique
qualifications to perform these services. The Consultant shall not assign (or
subcontract other than as specifically identified in Exhibit A) its performance under
this Agreement or any portions of this Agreement without the prior written consent
of the City, which consent must be sought at least thirty (30) days prior to the date
of any proposed assignment.
12.2 Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each
provision of this Agreement including Section 6, Public Records; Section 10,
Nondiscrimination; proper bidding procedures where applicable; and all local, State
and Federal statutes, ordinances and guidelines.
12.3 Any technical or professional service subcontract not listed in this Agreement, must
have prior written approval by the City.
Page 81 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 8 of 9
13. Termination.
13.1 Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any
reason upon giving the other party no less than ten (10) business days written notice
in advance of the effective date of such termination.
13.2 Termination for Cause. If the Consultant fails to perform in the manner called for
in this Agreement, or if the Consultant fails to comply with any other provisions of
this Agreement and fails to correct such noncompliance within five (5) business
days of written notice thereof, the City may terminate this Agreement for cause.
Termination shall be effected by serving a notice of termination on the Consultant
setting forth the manner in which the Consultant is in default. The Consultant will
only be paid for services and expenses complying with the terms of this Agreement,
incurred prior to termination.
14. General Provisions.
14.1 For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
14.2 Notice. Notice provided for in this Agreement shall be sent by:
14.2.1 Personal service upon the Project Administrators; or
14.2.2 Certified mail to the physical address of the parties, or by electronic
transmission to the e-mail addresses designated for the parties below.
14.3 The Project Administrator for the purpose of this Agreement shall be:
14.3.1 For the City: Steve Worley, P.E, or his/her designee
Public Works Designee
525 North 3rd
PO Box 293
Pasco WA 99301
WorleyS@pasco-wa.gov (e-mail address)
14.3.2 For the Consultant: Craig Anderson, P.E., or his/her designee
Project Manager
345 Bobwhite Ct., Suite 230
Boise, ID 83706
Craig.Anderson@murraysmith.us (e-mail address)
Page 82 of 111
Professional Services Agreement – Murraysmith Agreement No. 19048
19072 – WWTP Improvements – Phase 1 Page 9 of 9
15. Dispute Resolution.
15.1 This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and entered
into and delivered within the State of Washington and it is agreed by each party
hereto that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington.
15.2 In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default, or
interpretation of this Agreement, the Project Administrators, or their designees,
shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the event the dispute
cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be resolved by
arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, with both parties waiving the right
of a jury trial upon trial de novo, with venue placed in Pasco, Franklin County,
Washington. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable
attorney fees and costs as additional award and judgment against the other.
16. Nonwaiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time limitation
provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other similar event or
other provision of this Agreement.
17. Integration. This Agreement between the parties consists in its entirety of this document
and any exhibits, schedules or attachments. Any modification of this Agreement or change
order affecting this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties.
18. Authorization. By signature below, each party warrants that they are authorized and
empowered to execute this Agreement binding the City and the Consultant respectively.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the
date first written above.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON CONSULTANT
Dave Zabell, City Manager Craig Anderson, P.E. – Project Manager
ATTEST:
Debra C. Barham, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Kerr Ferguson Law, PLLC, City Attorney
Page 83 of 111
SRF Specification Insert 1 Revised 10/24/2014
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND
ENGINEERING SERVICES INSERT
Revised 10/24/14
The following clauses will be incorporated into contracts for engineering services receiving
financial assistance from the Washington State Department of Ecology Water Pollution Control
Revolving Fund. In the event of conflict within the contract these clauses shall take precedence
Compliance with State and Local Laws
The engineering services provider (CONTRACTOR) shall assure compliance with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws, requirements, and ordinances as they pertain to the design,
implementation, and administration of the approved project.
State Interest Exclusion
Partial funding of this project is being provided through the Washington State Department of
Ecology Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund. Neither the State of Washington nor any of
its departments or employees are, or shall be, a party to this contract or any subcontract.
Third Party Beneficiary
Partial funding of this project is being provided through the Washington State Department of
Ecology Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund. All parties agree that the State of Washington
shall be, and is hereby, named as an express third-party beneficiary of this contract, with full
rights as such.
Cost Basis of Contract
No contract may be written for "cost-plus-a-percentage-of-cost" or "percentage of construction
cost." The cost basis for this contract must be cost-reimbursement, unit price, fixed-price, time
and materials, or any combination of these four methods.
Funding Recognition
Documents produced under this agreement shall inform the public that the project received
financial assistance from the Washington State Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund.
Washington State Department of Ecology’s and the EPA’s logomust be on all signs and
documents. Logos will be provided as needed.
Access to the work site and to records
The CONTRACTOR shall provide for access to their records by Washington State Department
of Ecology and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) personnel.
EXHIBIT A
Page 84 of 111
SRF Specification Insert 2 Revised 10/24/2014
The CONTRACTOR shall maintain accurate records and accounts to facilitate the Owner’s audit
requirements and shall ensure that all subcontractors maintain auditable records. These records
shall be separate and distinct from the CONTRACTOR’s other records and accounts.
All such records shall be available to the Owner and to Washington State Department of Ecology
and EPA personnel for examination. All records pertinent to this project shall be retained by the
CONTRACTOR for a period of three (3) years after the final audit.
Certification Regarding Suspension, Debarment, Ineligibility Or Voluntary
Exclusion
1. The CONTRACTOR, by signing this agreement, certifies that it is not suspended,
debarred, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible or otherwise excluded from
contracting with the federal government, or from receiving contracts paid for with federal
funds. If the CONTRACTOR is unable to certify to the statements contained in the
certification, they must provide an explanation as to why they cannot.
2. The CONTRACTOR shall provide immediate written notice to the Washington State
Department of Ecology if at any time the CONTRACTOR learns that its certification was
erroneous when submitted or had become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
3. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered
transaction, participant, person, primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and
voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meaning set out in the Definitions
and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact
the Washington State Department of Ecology for assistance in obtaining a copy of the
regulations.
4. The CONTRACTOR agrees it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered
transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under the applicable Code of
Federal Regulations, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
from participation in this covered transaction.
5. The CONTRACTOR further agrees by signing this agreement, that it will include this
clause titled “Certification Regarding Suspension, Debarment, Ineligibility Or Voluntary
Exclusion” without modification in all lower tier covered transactions and in all
solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.
6. Pursuant to 2CFR180.330, the CONTRACTOR is responsible for ensuring that any lower
tier covered transaction complies with certification of suspension and debarment
requirements.
7. The CONTRACTOR acknowledges that failing to disclose the information required in
the Code of Federal Regulations may result in the delay or negation of this funding
agreement, or pursuance of legal remedies, including suspension and debarment.
8. The CONTRACTOR agrees to keep proof in its agreement file that it and all lower tier
Page 85 of 111
SRF Specification Insert 3 Revised 10/24/2014
recipients or contractors are not suspended or debarred and will make this proof available
to the Washington State Department of Ecology upon request. The
RECIPIENT/CONTRACTOR must run a search in http://www.sam.gov/ and print a copy
of completed searches to document proof of compliance.
This term and condition supersedes EPA Form 5700-49, “Certification Regarding Debarment,
Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters.”
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises
General Compliance (40 CFR Part 33).
The CONTRACTOR shall comply with the requirements of the Environmental Protection
Agency’s Program for Participation By Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) 40 CFR Part
33.
Non-discrimination Provision (40CFR Appendix A to Part 33).
The CONTRACTOR shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in
the performance of this contract. The CONTRACTOR shall carry out applicable requirements of
40 CFR part 33 in the award and administration of contracts awarded under EPA financial
assistance agreements. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to carry out these requirements is a
material breach of this contract which may result in the termination of this contract or other
legally available remedies.
Six Good Faith Efforts (40 CFR Part 33 Subpart C).
The CONTRACTOR agrees to make the following good faith efforts whenever procuring
subcontracts, equipment, services and supplies. The CONTRACTOR shall retain records
documenting compliance with the following six good faith efforts.
Ensuring Disadvantaged Business Enterprises are made aware of contracting
opportunities to the fullest extent practicable through outreach and recruitment activities.
For Indian Tribal, State and Local and Government recipients, this will include placing
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises on solicitation lists and soliciting them whenever
they are potential sources. Qualified Women and Minority business enterprises may be
found on the Internet at www.omwbe.wa.gov or by contacting the Washington State
Office of Minority and Women’s Enterprises at (866) 208-1064.
Making information on forthcoming opportunities available to Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises and arrange time frames for contracts and establish delivery schedules, where
the requirements permit, in a way that encourages and facilitates participation by
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in the competitive process. This includes, whenever
possible, posting solicitations for bids or proposals for a minimum of thirty (30) calendar
days before the bid or proposal closing date.
Considering in the contracting process whether firms competing for large contracts could
subcontract with Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. For Indian Tribal, State and local
Government recipients, this will include dividing total requirements when economically
feasible into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by
Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in the competitive process.
Encourage contracting with a consortium of Disadvantaged Business Enterprises when a
Page 86 of 111
SRF Specification Insert 4 Revised 10/24/2014
contract is too large for one of these firms to handle individually.
Using services and assistance of the Small Business Administration and the Minority
Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce.
If the prime contractor awards subcontracts, requiring the subcontractors to take the six
good faith efforts in paragraphs 1 through 5 above.
Page 87 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 1
SCOPE OF WORK
WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
CITY OF PASCO, WA
Background
The City of Pasco, Washington (City) has been one of the fastest growing cities in the State of
Washington and the nation over the last several years. To plan for the impacts of this growth on
the City’s municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and ensure it has adequate treatment
capacity for the foreseeable future, a Facility Plan was recently completed. This report identified
existing and projected future WWTP deficiencies through the year 2040 and developed a plan to
address them. The Facility Plan was approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology
(Ecology) in August of 2019.
In late August of 2019, the City solicited Statements of Qualifications from consulting engineering
firms for the design of the first two phases of work identified in the Facility Plan listed below.
•Facility Plan Project 1B - Secondary Treatment
•Facility Plan Project 1C - Outfall (Project No. 1)
•Facility Plan Project 1D - Mechanical Dewatering
•Facility Plan Project 1E - Mechanical Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) Thickening
•Facility Plan Project 2A - Secondary Treatment (Project No. 2)
•Facility Plan Project 2B - Outfall (Project No. 2)
•Facility Plan Project 2C - UV Expansion Project
In early September 2019, the City received responses from five firms, four of which were
subsequently interviewed on October 17th. Murraysmith (Consultant) was notified they were
selected to perform this work on October 25th.
During the process of developing this scope of work, these projects were reorganized into the
following two phases to better address the short-term capacity needs of the WWTP, improve the
efficiency of design execution, and better accommodate the loan funding application schedule
associated with the first phase of work.
PHASE 1
•Facility Plan Project 1B - Secondary Treatment (Project No. 1)
•Facility Plan Project 2A - Secondary Treatment (Project No. 2)
•Facility Plan Project 1C - Outfall (Project No. 1)
EXHIBIT B
Page 88 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 2
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
PHASE 2
• Facility Plan Project 1D - Mechanical Dewatering
• Facility Plan Project 1E - Mechanical Waste Activated Sludge (WAS) Thickening
• Facility Plan Project 2B - Outfall (Project No. 2)
• Facility Plan Project 2C - UV Expansion Project
The following Scope of Services has nine different tasks and is for the design of the Phase 1
improvements only.
Scope of Services
Task 1 - Project Management
The objective of the Project Management task is to assure the design team stays on track to deliver
the project on time and budget and that City goals and objectives are met. This task includes
project invoicing and status tracking, the development of and updates to the Project Management
Plan, a kick-off meeting, City and internal design team communications and coordination, and
other general administrative and project management activities to keep the project on track.
Activities:
1.1 Invoices/Progress Reports
The project will be managed to maintain the scope, schedule, and budget. At a minimum, updates
on project schedule and budget will be provided as part of the monthly invoicing process. Monthly
invoices will include expenditures by task, hours worked by project personnel, and other direct
expenses with the associated backup documentation. Monthly progress reports will accompany
each invoice and include budget status (percent spent and budget remaining), progress (in terms
of percent complete), summary of work accomplished, estimated work to be completed in the
next invoice, issues encountered and actions taken for their resolution or that still require project
team action, and discussion of identified potential impacts to scope, budget, or schedule.
1.2 Project Management Plan
A Project Management Plan (PMP) will be developed to guide the overall execution of the project
and will include: a project overview and key understandings; organizational chart summarizing
roles/responsibilities and contact information for all team members; project scope of work and
schedule with a summary of key deliverables and milestone dates; Project Budget summary
broken down by subtask and discipline; a project customized 4-step design process checklist; and
a Quality Management Plan summarizing QA/QC procedures for all deliverables.
Page 89 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 3
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
1.3 Kick-Off Meeting
A kick-off meeting will be held at the WWTP to review the project, introduce new team members
to the facility and the City, establish project goals and objectives, review communication protocols,
and discuss the project scope and schedule. A tour of the WWTP site will be conducted following
the kickoff meeting to show the new team members the facility and start specific discussions on
critical elements that need to be resolved before the development of the contract documents
begin in Task 5.
1.4 City and Design Team Coordination
As project manager, Craig Anderson will lead and oversee project communications with the City
and design team throughout the duration of the project, lead meeting and workshop discussions,
keep the City up-to-date on project issues and details and make sure the City’s input is
incorporated into the work product. Mark Cummings and Miaomiao Zhang will assist Craig with
project management efforts to ensure secondary points of contact and res ponsibility due to the
scale of the project.
1.5 City Council Presentation Support
Updates to the City Council are anticipated throughout the design and at the time of bid award.
Consultant’s project manager will assist with up to three presentations to Council by being in
attendance and preparing presentation support material.
Deliverables
1. Monthly invoice and progress report (PDF electronic format)
2. Project Management Plan (PDF electronic format)
3. Kick-Off Meeting Notes/Action Item Summary (PDF electronic format)
4. City Council Presentation Materials (electronic format)
Assumptions
1. Consultant assumes a Notice to Proceed date by the second week of January 2020.
2. Project duration is anticipated to be no more than 15 months; therefore, it is assumed that
there will be up to 15 progress payments/status reports.
3. Meeting and workshop facilitation will be limited to those specifically identified in this
scope of work.
4. The City will provide clear, consolidated and timely input and review of the work products
produced by the consultant
5. The development of a detailed alternative decision process (e.g. – pairwise comparison,
business case evaluation, etc.) will not be required to aid the City in making final design
decisions.
Page 90 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 4
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
Task 2 – Project Definition
The WWTP improvements that will be designed under this scope of work are based on the Facility
Plan recommendations but require further refinement, analysis, and information to support the
design process. The intent of this task is to further refine the proposed improvements by gathering
and reviewing additional facility information and big picture treatment process options and
preferences. The work in this design step focuses on ensuring the facility and process details have
been refined, discussed, and agreed to before more detailed design proceeds.
Activities:
2.1 Facility Data Collection & Analysis
Detailed existing facility information will be gathered and processed for future use in the
development of the detailed facility design. This information will be reviewed for potential
impacts to the Facility Plan improvement concepts. Work will include:
• Site survey – field topographic and boundary survey of the WWTP site used to develop
AutoCAD base map for use in the design. Survey will capture open space topography,
above ground evidence of all existing underground utilities/pipe/conduit, power poles,
light poles, fences, walls, noteworthy site features, significant vegetation, hardscape
features (curb, pavement, sidewalk, etc.), buildings, key hydraulic features on various unit
processes, and location and approximate depth of utilities/pipe/conduit using ground
penetrating radar and electromagnetic line locating devices.
• Geotechnical investigations – geotechnical field investigations and testing will be
performed to support the preparation of a Geotechnical Report that will be produced
under Task 3. Geotechnical field investigations are assumed to include up to eleven (11)
soil borings to a depth of up to 40 feet and associated testing to provide data and design
recommendations for the design of the proposed facilities.
• Existing E & IC system review and analysis – an on-site review of the existing WWTP’s
electrical and instrumentation systems, including an arc-flash hazard analysis and
modeling, will be performed for the purposes of verifying the accuracy of existing system
relative to record drawings and quantifying system operational improvement needs
associated with the proposed work.
• Existing Facility Structural and Architectural review – desktop and field review and
evaluations of existing structural and architectural facilities that will be modified as part of
the project.
• WWTP Operation and Automation preferences – City WWTP staff will be interviewed to
understand and document general facility operation and automation preferences that will
be used to guide the design on the proposed improvements.
• Preliminary Building Official Coordination and Code Review – Consultant will initiate
discussions with the local Building Official and their representatives to discuss and
document the codes, design criteria, and process required for the design and construction
of the proposed facilities. Topics will include items such as applicable codes
Page 91 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 5
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
(building/plumbing/electrical/fire) and requirements, special inspection requirements for
non-facility improvements, NFPA 820 considerations, and design and construction review
and approval process.
2.2 Process Data Collection & Analysis
The Facility Plan relied on general system information and historical treatment process data
routinely collected by the City for the evaluation and selection of improvement alternatives. More
detailed unit process system performance analysis and wastewater characterization is needed to
properly size and configure the WWTP improvements. This work includes:
• Supplemental Wastewater Characterization – existing wastewater and WWTP process
data will be reviewed and a plan developed for the collection and testing of additional data
that is needed to for biological and general process modelling and design of the proposed
upgrades. Collected information will be analyzed and used for the development of the
necessary model inputs or design criteria.
• WWTP Process Model Refinement – The process modelling performed as part of the
Facility Plan will be updated and calibrated further using the supplemental wastewater
characterization data that was collected.
• WWTP Hydraulic Models Refinement – The hydraulic model performed as part of the
Facility Plan will be updated using critical hydraulic control element measurements
gathered as part of the site survey. Additionally, a model of the City’s existing aeration
basin low pressure air system will be developed and calibrated.
2.3 Major Equipment/Product Refinement
There are numerous equipment options available for performing key treatment functions, several
with unique characteristics (e.g. – purchase cost, energy efficiency, operational ease, mechanical
configuration, noise levels, space requirements, etc.). The design team will use their collective
past project experience as well as solicited input from various equipment suppliers to generate a
list of the major equipment and product options and their relative differences for review with City
staff. It is anticipated that selection of the preferred equipment/product options can be addressed
during the normal course of the Task 2 and Task 3 work items. However, it is anticipated that
some items will require a more thorough review as provided in Task 8.
2.4 Unit Process Configuration Refinement
Similar to equipment and product options, there are multiple unit process sizing and configuration
options available that impact the design of the proposed improvements. The design team will use
their collective past project experience, the results of the subtask 2.1 and 2.2 work, additional unit
process concept development efforts, and discussions with City staff to identify the most feasible
process configuration options available for the WWTP. Consultant will identify and quantify the
relative differences between these options for City review, input, and selection.
Page 92 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 6
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
2.5 Progress/Findings Workshop & Project Definition Report
The deliverables and findings from this task will be presented to the City in an interactive half day
workshop to gather City input and direction. A summary of the Workshop Presentation
discussions, decisions, and action items along with all other task deliverables will be compiled into
a Project Definition Report.
Deliverables
1. Draft technical memoranda (PDF electronic format) that summarize the work efforts of
subtasks 2.1 through 2.4
2. Workshop Presentation (PowerPoint electronic format)
3. Project Definition Report (PDF electronic format)
Assumptions
1. City will provide open access to the WWTP facilities for Consultant investigations and
evaluations.
2. City staff to provide as much of the requested background information as possible and
coordinate with previous consultants, if necessary, to gather missing information.
3. City staff will help locate existing buried pipelines, utilities and conduits as part of the site
survey and geotechnical investigation activities.
4. Spoils from geotechnical field investigations can be disposed of at the WWTP site.
5. Electrical, I&C, Structural, and Architectural site reviews will be limited to what can be
visually observed and easily accessed. The need for more extensive activities (e.g. –
excavations and destructive or non-destructive testing) is not anticipated.
6. Electrical and I&C work will be coordinated with MCC 140 breaker coordination work the
City is presently executing under a separate contract.
7. City staff will collect the supplemental wastewater sampling that is identified and deliver
them to the designated testing location.
8. Consultant is responsible for developing a sampling plan for execution by City staff. City
staff will collect the samples, complete testing that they can handle in their lab, and take
samples to a private lab (Energy Northwest) for any remaining testing that is required.
Consultant will pay for the testing by the private lab and a $3,500 allowance is provided
in the budget for these costs.
9. Consultant will coordinate site visit needs with City staff at least 48 hours in advance.
10. City will both collect data requested by Consultant and provide feedback to Consultant
in a timely manner so as to not negatively impact the project schedule.
11. Ecology’s regional representative will be invited to the Workshop and be provided the
deliverables for review and comment.
12. City and Ecology review will occur after the workshop. Consultant and City project
managers will meet to discuss review comments and resolve conflicting comments no
later than two weeks after the workshop.
Page 93 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 7
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
13. The City will provide clear, consolidated and timely input and review of the work products
produced by the consultant.
14. Consultant will continue to proceed with design efforts, as needed, while City and
Ecology perform their reviews.
15. At the conclusion of this task, the design is considered 5 to 10% complete.
Task 3 – Schematic Design
The purpose of this task is to develop a schematic design that incorporates the preferences,
requirements and constraints previously identified to solicit City input and refinement. This task
is considered the start of the project’s detailed design process. In this task, all key design discipline
leads begin their development of the design concept. The schematic design that is developed
establishes the general scope, conceptual design, scale and relationships among the components
of the project. It will include discipline specific design ideas so that major process decisions such
as equipment spacing, process type/configuration, redundancy, and O&M preferences can be
made by the City.
Activities:
3.1 Technical Memoranda
Several technical memoranda will be generated to document and define the schematic design
associated with each unit process improvement area and will use the following general format, as
appropriate:
• Introduction and Background
• Design Criteria
• Option Development and Discussion, including:
‐ Process Schematic Diagram & Flow Diagram
‐ Building Floor Plan or Unit Process Plan View sketches
‐ Equipment and Material Cut Sheets
‐ Process and Hydraulic Evaluations
‐ Potential Impact on other WWTP Unit Processes
• Option Evaluation, including:
‐ Non-economic factors and considerations
‐ Capital and lifecycle costs
‐ Energy efficiency funding opportunities
• Recommendations
The following unit process technical memoranda are anticipated:
• Headworks concrete repair
• Selector Options
Page 94 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 8
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
• Aeration Basin Evaluation and Options
• RAS/WAS System Evaluation
• Outfall Concept
• Effluent Flowmeter Options
3.2 Schematic Design Report
An executive summary and supplemental materials (as listed below) will be prepared to add to the
technical memoranda prepared in subtask 3.1to create a Draft Schematic Design Report for City
and Ecology Review.
• Preliminary WWTP Site Plan (Civil)
• Overall WWTP Process Flow Diagram
• Flow Stream Identification Methodology Proposal
• WWTP Hydraulic Profile
• WWTP Mass Balance
• Draft Geotechnical Report
• Preliminary Electrical Design Concepts
• Preliminary Structural and Architectural Design Concepts
• Preliminary Control System Block Diagram and Control Philosophy
• Ecology SRF Loan Requirement Summary
• Construction Cost Estimate (per Task 6)
3.3 Progress/Findings Workshop
The deliverables and findings from this task will be presented to the City in up to a full day
interactive workshop to solicit City input and direction. At the completion of subtask 3.3, a
summary of the Workshop Presentation discussions, decisions, and action items will be
documented and added to the Draft Schematic Design Report to create the final report.
Deliverables
1. Workshop Presentation (PowerPoint electronic format)
2. Draft and Final Schematic Design Reports (PDF electronic format)
Assumptions
1. The Facility Plan meets the requirements of an Engineering Report per Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) 173-240-060 and a separate Engineering Report for the work
proposed and subsequent Ecology review will not be required.
2. Ecology’s regional representative will be invited to the Workshop and be provided the
deliverables for review and comment.
Page 95 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 9
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
3. City and Ecology review will occur after the workshop. Consultant and City project
managers will meet to discuss review comments and resolve conflicting comments no later
than two weeks after the workshop.
4. The City will provide clear, consolidated and timely input and review of the work products
produced by the consultant.
5. Consultant will continue to proceed with design efforts, as needed, while City and Ecology
perform their reviews.
6. At the conclusion of this task, the design is considered 20 to 30% complete.
Task 4 – Design Development
The objective of this task is to finalize the design concept and describe it in terms of structural,
architectural, electrical, mechanical and treatment systems. At the completion of this phase of
the design process, it is intended that all major decisions have been made and the design elements
are essentially “frozen” so that the larger design team can efficiently use the deliverables to guide
the detailed development of the construction contract documents.
Activities:
4.1 Design Concept Refinement
With the basic process, site, major equipment, O&M and overall concept identified at the end of
Task 3, additional analysis will be performed as required to adequately define and communicate
the design for City and Ecology review, input and endorsement. The design of supporting systems
and utilities will be detailed by discipline in both technical memoranda and preliminary drawing
format. Work products from this design step will include the update or preparation of at least the
following items.
• Final flow stream IDs, legends, and abbreviations
• Final Process Flow Diagrams
• 90% Process & Instrumentation and Control Diagrams (P&IDs)
• WWTP Hydraulic Profile
• Equipment Database Spreadsheet with support requirements
• Final WWTP Mass Balance
• Site Plans for Civil, Mechanical, and Electrical Utilities
• Preliminary Construction Duration and Sequencing Plans
• General Contractor Supplemental Bidder Responsibilities (per 4.2)
• Preliminary Electrical One-Line diagrams
• Building Floor Plans and Sections
• Unit Process Renderings, Plan Views and Sections
• 90% Control System Block Diagram
Page 96 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 10
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
• Process Control Narrative Descriptions
• Construction Cost Estimate (per Task 6)
4.2 General Contractor Supplemental Bidder Responsibilities
Due to the specialized nature of the construction work, Consultant will work with City to develop
supplemental bidder responsibility criteria to include in the bidding documents. The criteria used
will be based on similar material used by the Consultant on past projects with modifications as
necessary to meet specific state, Ecology, or City needs. Criteria will be crafted with the intent of
not unduly restricting competition, but to establish a baseline threshold of the ability of the bidder
to successfully perform the work.
4.3 Preliminary Contract Document Configuration
Consultant will prepare the following items to facilitate, City, Ecology, and design team review and
comment. Input received on all three will be incorporated and the modified documents used to
start the formal assembly of the contract documents in Task 5.
• City Construction Contract Legal/Insurance Questionnaire
• Draft Specification list (including Ecology SRF inserts, as appropriate) and draft major
equipment specifications
• Draft Design Drawing Index
4.4 Design Development Package and Review Workshop
The work products produced in this task will be assembled into a Draft Design Development
Package for City and Ecology Review. A workshop presentation that summarizes the work
products, findings and conclusions from this task will be prepared and presented to the City in up
to a full day interactive workshop. At the completion of the workshop, a summary of the
Workshop Presentation discussions, decisions, and action items will be documented and created
and added to finalize the Design Development Package.
Deliverables
1. Workshop Presentation (PowerPoint electronic format)
2. Draft and Final Design Development Package (PDF electronic format)
Assumptions
1. At the completion of this task, all major design decisions are considered complete and
ready for final contract document development by the expanded design team. Significant
design changes initiated by the City after this point will likely require a design budget
adjustment.
2. Ecology’s regional representative will be invited to the Workshop and be provided the
deliverables for review and comment.
Page 97 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 11
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
3. City and Ecology review will occur after the workshop. Consultant and City project
managers will meet to discuss review comments and resolve conflicting comments no later
than two weeks after the workshop.
4. The City will provide clear, consolidated and timely input and review of the work products
produced by the consultant.
5. Consultant will continue to proceed with design efforts, as needed, while City and Ecology
perform their reviews.
6. At the conclusion of this task, the design is considered 50 to 60% complete.
Task 5 – Contract Document Development
The purpose of this task is to transform the developed design concept into the detailed Contract
Documents necessary for the bidding, award, and construction of the work. This task has been
divided into two steps to facilitate review and finalization of the documents.
Activities:
5.1 90% Contract Document Development
Consultant will prepare a 90% complete set of Contract Documents, which will be the basis for the
final Contract Document review submittal. These documents will include the Bidding
Requirements, Contract Form, Conditions of the Contract, Specifications, and Drawings. Drawings
and specifications will include the required civil site work, landscaping, architectural, structural,
process mechanical, HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and instrumentation and control design necessary
for both the bidding and construction of the proposed improvements.
5.2 90% Contract Document Overview Workshop
A workshop presentation that summarizes the work products from this task will be prepared and
presented to the City in up to a full day interactive workshop. Workshop Presentation discussions,
decisions, and action items along with City and Ecology review comments will be documented and
consolidated for use in finalizing the Contract Documents.
5.3 Constructability Review
A constructability and general review of the prepared design documents (starting with the
schematic design report and ending with the 90% Contract Documents) will be completed by
consultant’s in-house construction management staff, third party construction management staff,
or other entity as agreeable to the City. The review documents will be provided a week in advance
of review meetings. Budget includes up to two review meetings of four hour duration with the
design team leads to discuss project constructability and recommended alternative approaches.
Consultant will prepare and distribute a summary of the review comments received for discussion
and potential inclusion in the next design deliverable.
Page 98 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 12
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
5.4 Finalization of Contract Documents
Following receipt of the review comments, consultant will incorporate them, as appropriate, and
prepare a final stamped set of Contract Documents ready for formal Ecology review and approval.
5.5 Final Contract Document Overview Workshop
Modifications to the 90% documents and how the various review comments were addressed, will
be documented and presented to the City and Ecology in up to a half day workshop.
Deliverables
1. 90% and Final Contract Document Workshop Presentations (PowerPoint electronic
format)
2. 90% and Final Contract Document Packages (PDF electronic format, up to four hard copies
with half size drawings, and up to one full size drawing set of Final drawings)
Assumptions
1. Ecology’s regional representative will be invited to the Workshops and be provided the
deliverables for review and comment.
2. City and Ecology review will occur after the workshop. Consultant and City project
managers will meet to discuss review comments and resolve conflicting comments no later
than two weeks after the workshop.
3. The City will provide clear, consolidated and timely input and review of the work products
produced by the consultant.
4. Consultant will continue to proceed with design efforts, as needed, while City and Ecology
perform their reviews.
5. The Contract Documents shall consist of the following elements or sections – Bidding
Requirements, Contract Forms, Conditions of the Contract, Technical Specifications, and
Drawings.
6. Consultant’s standard documents (which are based on the Engineering Joint Contract
Documents) will be used for the basis of the Bidding Requirements, Contract Forms, and
Conditions of the Contract sections of the Contract Documents. These base documents
will be augmented with amendments or revisions as necessary to address both Pasco and
Ecology SRF specific standards and requirements, as applicable.
7. The specifications will be based on consultant’s standard documents and follow the 50
division Construction Specification Institute (CSI) format.
8. Only one set of Contract Documents is assumed.
9. It is assumed the construction will be performed by a single general contractor who will
furnish all equipment, materials, and labor necessary to construct the project.
10. The Contract Documents will assume a lump sum bid with award to the lowest responsive,
responsible bidder.
Page 99 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 13
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
11. The drawings will be developed using consultant’s standard AutoCAD software. At
consultant’s discretion, some drawings may be produced in three-dimensional format to
assist the design, review, and construction process.
12. The drawings will be produced on 22” by 34” full-size format, but with text and layout that
will allow the use of half-size sheets.
Task 6 – Cost Opinions
The intent of this task is to prepare construction cost opinions throughout the design process to
be used as a tool to help the City and design team evaluate the relative impact of design changes
and manage the project from a budgetary perspective. The relative accuracy of this work will
increase as the design progresses. Consultant will endeavor to produce these opinions within the
accuracy ranges identified in AACE International’s Recommended Practice Document No. 18-R-97.
These cost opinions should be expected to vary from the actual construction bids received due to
a number of factors outside the control of the City or Consultant. These factors include, but are
not limited to, volatility and unknowns regarding commodity pricing, the labor market, inflationary
escalation, etc. Consultant will employ an outside construction cost estimating firm for this task.
Activities:
An estimate of construction costs will be developed based on the deliverables prepared for each
of the project tasks as listed below:
6.1 Project Definition Construction Cost Opinion
6.2 Schematic Design Construction Cost Opinion
6.3 Design Development Construction Cost Opinion
6.4 90% Contract Document Construction Cost Opinion
6.5 100% Contract Document Construction Cost Opinion
Deliverables:
1. Construction cost opinion report based on the design information available in each step as
described in Task 2 through 5.
Task 7 – Design Reviews
The purpose of this task is to monitor the quality of the project using design lead independent
quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) reviews. Multidiscipline internal QA/QC design reviews
will be performed informally during the progress of the design. Formal QA/QC reviews will be
performed in parallel with the City and Ecology reviews at the following stages/subtasks.
Page 100 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 14
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
Activities:
7.1 Project Definition QA/QC
7.2 Schematic Design QA/QC
7.3 Design Development QA/QC
7.4 90% Contract Document QA/QC
7.5 Final Contract Document QA/QC
Task 8 – Special Activities & Investigations
The objective of this task is to provide for the execution of a number of special activities or
investigations that are either not included in the previous tasks and/or whose timing or need has
yet to be determined. For each item, either a technical memorandum or activity specific
document will be prepared to facilitate City review and comment.
Activities:
8.1 Interim WAS Thickening Plan
The existing waste activated sludge (WAS) thickening equipment (DAFT) is old and is at or near
capacity. The City also has a rotary drum thickener (RDT) that is used for digested sludge
thickening that may be used to either fully or partially as a substitute for the DAFT, if it fails. This
plan will be developed to help ensure that this critical WWTP function is maintained while design
and construction of the proposed WAS thickening improvements are being completed. The plan
will explore and quantify the costs and operational impacts of various options to provide interim
WAS thickening ranging from using the RDT with the existing or a new polymer to the rental or
lease of new equipment that could be housed in a temporary enclosure until the new facilities are
completed. City staff will support this plan by doing operational tests of the RDT in early 2020.
8.2 Interim Blower Redundancy Plan
Air supply to the City’s two existing aeration basins is provided by two magnetic bearing turbo
blowers that were installed in 2012. While this equipment is relatively new and has performed
well, the operation of both blowers is regularly needed. If one of these blowers were to fail, the
City would not be able to treat their wastewater adequately. This plan will be developed to help
ensure that this critical WWTP function is maintained while design and construction of the
proposed Secondary Treatment improvements are being completed. The plan will explore and
quantify the costs and impacts of various options to provide supplemental interim blower capacity
ranging from refurbishing and making an old blower from the 1990s operational to expediting the
purchase and installation of a new magnetic bearing turbo blower similar to those presently being
used.
Page 101 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 15
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
8.3 Detailed Equipment Selection Reviews
The proposed improvements can employ numerous different types and configurations of
traditional and emerging treatment equipment with varying levels of treatment performance, up-
front equipment costs, operational costs, and maintenance needs. While the selection of most of
the equipment needed is anticipated not to require more than a desktop analysis by the
consultant, this subtask provides an allowance for the City and Consultant to perform specialized
investigations into some of these technologies to help determine the equipment that is best suited
to meet there needs. Equipment that may warrant a higher level of investigation include aeration
diffusers, aeration blowers, open channel flowmeters, and flow splitting devices. No work on this
subtask will be performed without the advance approval of the City
8.4 WWTP Site Visits
Like subtask 8.3 this subtask is an allowance for visiting active WWTPs to aid equipment selection.
These visits will involve seeing the equipment options in operation and talking to the operators
that use them on a daily basis to solicit their input on performance and ease of use versus that
claimed by the various equipment manufacturers. No work on this subtask will be performed
without the advance approval of the City.
8.5 Energy Efficiency Incentive Coordination & Application
Energy efficiency incentive payments are available from the Bonneville Power Administration
which are applied for and coordinated with the local power authority. Depending on the
equipment and processes selected by the City as part of the proposed improvements, there is a
strong likelihood that energy efficiency incentive payments can be received. This subtask is an
allowance for the Consultant to work with both the City and local power company to apply and
receive energy efficiency incentive approval prior to the bidding and construction of the work (a
requirement of the incentive program). No work on this subtask will be performed without the
advance approval of the City.
8.6 Permitting and Public Outreach
The proposed improvements will require multiple permitting elements, some of which may or may
not be required. This work includes SERP/SEPA checklists and reports, Cultural and Historical
Resources review and concurrence, the development of Inadvertent Discovery Plans, and Federal
Crosscutter coordination and review as a potential condition of receiving a state SRF Loan.
Associated public outreach may also be necessary depending on cultural and historical resource
sensitivities and federal cross-cutter review comments.
This subtask is an allowance, based on similar past efforts by both Consultant and City, for the
Consultant to assist City staff in public outreach to stakeholders as well as the joint preparation of
the reports, checklists, and applications needed for the execution of the proposed design. No work
on this subtask will be performed without the advance approval of the City.
Page 102 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 16
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
8.7 Right-of-Way and Easement Acquisition
The vast majority of the proposed improvements are planned to take place in City owned land at
the WWTP site. Work on the outfall pipeline is anticipated to require some level of additional
right-of-way. This subtask is an allowance, based on similar past efforts by both Consultant and
City, for the Consultant to assist City staff in the acquisition of all rights needed to execute the
proposed work, including permanent and temporary easements and right of entries. Work
anticipated includes the generation of legal descriptions, exhibits, title reports, appraisals, offer
letters and Administrative Offer Settlement. Work is assumed to be limited to negotiations with
the Port of Pasco only. Fees or payment for the purchase of land or easements are assumed to be
payed by the City and are not included in the budget for this work.
Task 9 – Bid-Phase Assistance
The aim of this task is to provide support to City staff during bidding and finalizing contracts with
the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with the Consultant providing the following services:
Activities:
9.1 Pre-Bid Meeting
Prepare a meeting agenda and attend the Pre-Bid Meeting with City staff, Contractors and other
parties interested in the project. Provide sign-in sheets and document questions and informal
responses made during the meeting.
9.2 Reponses to Bidder Inquiries and Addenda
Assist City with responses to Bidder inquiries and questions. Questions and inquiries that require
clarification to all Bidders will be issued via Addenda prepared by Consultant for City review and
use. This work may also include the development of addenda to cover minor comments received
by the City, Ecology, or other permitting agency that are received after the development of the
Contract Documents are complete.
9.3 Bid Evaluation Support
Conduct an evaluation of all bids received and prepare a Bid Tabulation spreadsheet that includes
a summary of the engineer’s estimate, the monetary bid from each bidder, a review of the selected
major equipment manufacturers, a review of required bid materials (e.g. – bid bond, listed
subcontractors, acknowledgement of addenda, etc.), and a review of the supplemental
responsibility criteria provided by the lowest responsive bidder. Discuss findings with the City and
then prepare a draft Recommendation of Award for City use.
Assumptions
1. All deliverables described in the subtasks will be provided in either PDF or Microsoft Word
format as needed.
Page 103 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 17
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
Budget
The work covered under this scope of work will be billed on a time and materials basis at the billing
rates for personnel working directly on the project, which will be made at the Consultant’s Hourly
Rates, plus Direct Expenses incurred. The overall budget estimate breakdown for this work is
outlined in the table below. Consultant will manage the work identified to the aggregate
authorized budget amount which shall not be exceeded without prior written authorization from
the City.
Task Amount
Task 1 - Project Management $230,475
Task 2 – Project Definition $171,445
Task 3 – Schematic Design $248,233
Task 4 – Design Development $314,948
Task 5 – Contract Document Development (90%) $669,558
Task 5 – Contract Document Development (Final) $156,351
Task 6 – Cost Opinions $125,124
Task 7 – Design Reviews $138,749
Task 8 – Special Activities & Investigations* $225,105
Task 9 – Bid-Phase Assistance $41,579
TOTAL $2,321,567*
* $144,950 of this budget on an as-needed basis and used only if approved by the City
Project Schedule
Assuming a Notice to Proceed by the second week of January 2020, the work provided under this
scope of work is anticipated to be completed per the milestone dates provided in the table below
to meet the City’s desire to apply for Ecology Funding for construction. Consultant will make every
effort to complete the work in a timely manner; however, it is agreed that consultant can not be
responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond its control, nor by factors that could not
reasonably have been foreseen at the time this scope was executed.
Page 104 of 111
City of Pasco MURRAYSMITH WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
December 2019 18
Pasco WWTP SOW_Phase 1 (31DEC2019).docx
Task Completion Date
Task 2 – Project Definition 2/21/2020
Task 3 – Schematic Design 4/10/2020
Task 4 – Design Development 5/29/2020
Task 5 – Contract Document Development (90%) 9/22/2020
Task 5 – Contract Document Development (Final) 11/16/2020
Page 105 of 111
Subconsultant Project Role Summary
Dr. David Stensel Treatment Process Technical Advisor - similar role in Facility Plan
Dale Richwine General Technical Advisor and Independent QA/QC - similar role in Facility
Plan
Tracy Cork General Technical Advisor and Independent QA/QC - similar role in Facility
Plan
Dr. Diego Rosso Energy Efficiency and Diffuser Option Specialist
Industrial Systems Supplemental Electrical and Instrumentation Design Support (Murraysmith
and IS have established work/expertise share working agreement)
Townsend Controls Supplemental Electrical and Instrumentation Support - local firm with
extensive knowledge of City systems and programming
Architects West Architectural/Building Facility Design
Shannon & Wilson Geotechnical Exploration and Engineering Support
Permit Survey Topographic and plant feature surveying
Geophysical Survey Utility locate support to Permit Survey
USF Right of Way Negotiations - outfall alignment focus
ESA/CRC Permitting and Cultural Resources Support, if required
Ott Sakai Independent Construction Cost Estimating Professionals
Page 106 of 111
WWTP IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE 1
City of Pasco, WA
PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE
LABOR CLASSIFICATION (HOURS)
Principal
Engineer III
Principal
Engineer III
Professional
Engineer V
Professional
Engineer VII
Professional
Engineer VIII
Professional
Engineer IV
Professional
Engineer IX
Professional
Engineer IX
Engineering
Designer II
Professional
Engineer VI
Professional
Engineer IX
Professional
Engineer VIII
Engineering
Designer VII
Principal
Engineer VI
Professional
Engineer III
Structural
Engineer
Engineering
Designer VI
$228 $228 $163 $182 $192 $153 $202 $202 $137 $173 $202 $192 $175 $257 $149 $250 $167
$239 $239 $171 $191 $202 $161 $212 $212 $144 $182 $212 $202 $184 $270 $156 $263 $175
Anderson, C.Zhang Cummings Flowers Brown Ellestad Foote II Szatkowski Pina Snider Jordan Real Bourque Kotey, T.Kotey, R.Friederichs Polglase
Task 1 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 - Invoices/Progress Reports 15 8 40
1.2 - PMP 16 40 16 2 2 2 2 2 2
1.3 - Kick-Off Meeting 24 16 24 12 12 8 12 12 12 12
1.4 - City and Design Team Coordination 360 120 120
1.5 - City Council Presentation Support 48 24
Task 1 Subtotal 463 184 224 0 14 12 10 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 14 14
Task 2 - PROJECT DEFINITION
2.1 - Site survey 2 4 4
2.1 - Geotechnical investigations 2 4 2 4
2.1 - Existing E&IC investigations 2 24 24
2.1 - Existing Facility Structural and Architectural review 2 12 12
2.1 - WWTP Operation and Automation preferences 2 4 4 4
2.1 - Preliminary Building Official Coordination and Code Review 1 2 2 2
2.2 - Supplemental WW Characterization 4 8 16
2.2 - WWTP Process Model Refinement 2 24 24
2.2 - Hydraulic Model (liquid)2 4 2 24
2.2 - Hydraulic Model (air)2 4 32
2.3 - Major Equipment/Product Refinement 2 8 8 8
2.4 - Unit Process Configuration Refinement 8 8 8 8 8
2.5 - Progress/Findings Workshop 8 4 24 2 8
2.5 - Project Definition Report 2 2 12
Task 2 Subtotal 41 60 72 48 6 0 4 0 0 0 84 26 24 0 12 18 0
Task 3 - SCHEMATIC DESIGN
3.1 - TM Headworks 2 4 4
3.1 - TM Selector 2 2 4 8 8
3.1 - TM Aeration Basins 2 2 4 8 8
3.1 - TM RAS/WAS 2 2 4 2 24 2
3.1 - TM Outfall 1 1 4 8
3.1 - TM Effluent Flowmeter 2 4 16 24
3.2 - Preliminary WWTP Site Plan (Civil)2 2 4 20 40 8
3.2 - Overall Process Flow Diagram 1 4 4 2 4
3.2 - Flow Stream Identification Methodology 2 4 2 4
3.2 - WWTP Hydraulic Profile 2 8 8 16 8
3.2 - Mass Balance 2 4 8 8
3.2 - Draft Geotechnical Report 1 2 4
3.2 - Preliminary Electrical Design Concepts 1 2 4 24 24
3.2 - Preliminary Structural and Architectural Design Concepts 2 4 4 2 8 8 8
3.2 - Preliminary Control System 1 2 2 2 8 16
3.2 - Ecology SRF Loan Requirement Summary 8 4 4
3.2 - Draft Schematic Design Report 4 4 24 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
3.3 - Progress/Findings Workshop 8 4 24 8
3.3 - Final Schematic Design Report 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Task 3 Subtotal 47 40 105 29 23 43 23 0 35 32 67 35 43 0 8 15 35
Task 4 - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
4.1 - Final Flow Stream IDs, legends, and abbreviations 2 4 2 2 2
4.1 - Final Process Flow Diagrams 2 8 8 8 8
4.1 - 90% P&IDS 2 8 8 8 16 16
4.1 - WWTP Hydraulic Profile 2 8 4 8 8 16
4.1 - Equipment Database Spreadsheet 2 8 8 8 8
4.1 - WWTP Mass Balance 2 4 8
4.1 - Civil Site Plan 8 4 4 24 48 4 32
4.1 - Mechanical Site Plan 8 4 4 16 16 40 16 40 16 24 4 32
4.1 - Electrical Site Plan 1 2 2 2 2 4 4 24 24
4.1 - Prelim Construction Duration/Sequencing Plan 8 2 2 8 8 8 8 8
4.1 - Electrical One-Line Diagrams 1 1 1 8 8
4.1 - Building Floor Plans and Sections 1 2 2 1 8 8 8 4 8 8 16
4.1 - Unit Process Renderings, Plan Views, and Sections 8 8 8 4 4 16 16 4 4 4 16
4.1 - 90% Control System Block Diagram 1 1 2 16
4.1 - Process Control Narrative Descriptions 4 4 4 8 16 4
4.2 - General Contractor Supplemental Bidder Responsibilities 16 4 4
4.3 - City Contract Legal/Insurance Questionnaire 8 16
4.3 - Draft Specification list 4 12 4 4 4 4 4 4 2
4.3 - Draft Major equipment specifications 8 24 16 16 16
4.3 - Draft Design Drawing Index 4 12 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 8
4.4 - Draft Design Development Package 4 4 24 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
4.4 - Review Workshop 8 4 24 8
4.4 - Final Design Development Package 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Task 4 Subtotal 106 130 125 11 65 78 67 16 43 102 139 95 35 0 20 37 163
City of Pasco, WA
December 2019
Pasco WWTP Fee Estimate_12.31.2019.xlsx
Murraysmith
WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
1 of 4Page 107 of 111
WWTP IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE 1
City of Pasco, WA
PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE
LABOR CLASSIFICATION (HOURS)
Principal
Engineer III
Principal
Engineer III
Professional
Engineer V
Professional
Engineer VII
Professional
Engineer VIII
Professional
Engineer IV
Professional
Engineer IX
Professional
Engineer IX
Engineering
Designer II
Professional
Engineer VI
Professional
Engineer IX
Professional
Engineer VIII
Engineering
Designer VII
Principal
Engineer VI
Professional
Engineer III
Structural
Engineer
Engineering
Designer VI
$228 $228 $163 $182 $192 $153 $202 $202 $137 $173 $202 $192 $175 $257 $149 $250 $167
$239 $239 $171 $191 $202 $161 $212 $212 $144 $182 $212 $202 $184 $270 $156 $263 $175
Anderson, C.Zhang Cummings Flowers Brown Ellestad Foote II Szatkowski Pina Snider Jordan Real Bourque Kotey, T.Kotey, R.Friederichs Polglase
Task 5 - CONTRACT DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT (90%)
5.1 - 90% General Sheets & Front-End Legal/Contract Docs 20 20 20
5.1 - 90% Civil/Site Drawings and Specifications 12 12 12 32 60 40 16 80 16 16 8 40
5.1 - 90% Architectural Drawings and Specifications 4 4 4 4 8 4 8 8 24
5.1 - 90% Structural Drawings and Specifications 4 4 4 4 8 2 8 4 8 32 120 60 60
5.1 - 90% Mechanical Drawings and Specifications 60 60 60 20 80 160 160 160
5.1 - 90% Electrical Drawings and Specifications 8 16 8 16 32 32 32 120 120
5.1 - 90% Instrumentation Drawings and Specifications 4 4 4 8 24 32 32
5.2 - 90% Documents Overview Workshop 32 32 32 24 24 24 24 24
5.2 - 90% Comment Consolidation 16 16 16 8 8 8 8 8
5.3 - Constructability Review 16 12 12 4 4 4 4 4
Task 5 Subtotal 176 180 172 0 112 188 78 16 88 224 284 188 152 32 120 112 284
Task 5 - CONTRACT DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT (FINAL)
5.4 - General Sheets and Front-End Legal/Contract Documents 5 5 5
5.4 - Civil/Site Drawings and Specifications 3 3 3 8 15 10 4 20 4 4 2 10
5.4 - Architectural Drawings and Specifications 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 6
5.4 - Structural Drawings and Specifications 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 8 30 15 15
5.4 - Mechanical Drawings and Specifications 15 15 15 5 20 40 40 40
5.4 - Electrical Drawings and Specifications 2 4 2 4 8 8 8 30 30
5.4 - Instrumentation Drawings and Specifications 1 1 1 2 6 8 8
5.4 - Final Documents Overview Workshop 8 8 8 6 6 6 6 6
Task 5 Subtotal 36 38 36 0 25 47 17 4 22 56 68 44 38 8 30 25 71
Task 6 - COST OPINIONS
6.1 - PD Construction Cost Opinion 4 16 4 4 4 4
6.2 - SD Construction Cost Opinion 2 8 2 2 2 2
6.3 - DD Construction Cost Opinion 2 8 2 2 2 2
6.4 - 90% CD Construction Cost Opinion 8 24 8 8 8 8
6.5 - Final CD Construction Cost Opinion 2 8 2 2 2 2
Task 6 Subtotal 18 0 64 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 18 18 0 0 0 18 0
Task 7 - DESIGN REVIEWS
7.1 - PD QA/QC 1 4 1 2 2
7.2 - SD QA/QC 2 8 2 4 4
7.3 - DD QA/QC 3 12 3 6 6
7.4 - 90% CD QA/QC 8 32 8 16 16
7.5 - Final CD QA/QC 2 8 2 4 4
Task 7 Subtotal 16 64 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 32
Task 8 - SPECIAL ACTIVITIES & INVESTIGATIONS
8.1 - Interim WAS Thickening Plan 4 4 8 8 8
8.2 - Interim Blower Redundancy Plan 4 4 8 60 20
8.3 - Detailed Equipment Selection Reviews 16 20 20 40 16
8.4 - WWTP Site Visits 12 12 12 12
8.5 - Energy Incentive Coordination & Application 12 24 16
8.6 - Permitting and Public Outreach 16 16 8 8
8.7 - ROW & Easement Acquisition 4 8 16 16
Task 8 Subtotal 68 40 96 0 0 0 24 0 24 0 120 60 0 0 0 0 0
Task 9 - BID-PHASE ASSISTANCE
9.1 - Pre-Bid Meeting 8 16
9.2 - Responses to Bidder Inquiries and Addenda 8 24 8 8 8 8 8 16
9.3 - Bid Evaluation Support 8 16
Task 9 Subtotal 24 0 56 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 8 16
TOTAL - ALL TASKS 995 736 966 88 271 368 231 36 212 414 802 488 292 72 190 247 615
City of Pasco, WA
December 2019
Pasco WWTP Fee Estimate_12.31.2019.xlsx
Murraysmith
WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
2 of 4Page 108 of 111
WWTP IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE 1
City of Pasco, WA
PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE
LABOR CLASSIFICATION (HOURS)
Construction
Manager VIII Inspector II
Principal
Engineer V
Principal
Engineer VI Admin. II Hours Labor
$216 $111 $248 $257 $97
$227 $117 $260 $270 $102
Machan Anderson, S.Van Meter Perry Thurston
18 81 14,186$ -$ -$ -$ 14,186$
2 1 1 90 19,863$ -$ -$ 36$ 19,899$
144 29,946$ 2,400$ 2,400$ 1,600$ 2,400$ 9,680$ 4,000$ 216$ 43,842$
600 135,450$ -$ -$ -$ 135,450$
72 15,599$ -$ 1,500$ -$ 17,099$
2 0 1 1 18 987 215,043$ 2,400$ -$ -$ -$ 2,400$ 1,600$ 2,400$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,680$ 5,500$ 252$ 230,475$
10 1,970$ 8,000$ 3,820$ 13,002$ 500$ -$ 15,472$
12 2,617$ 18,750$ 20,625$ -$ -$ 23,242$
2 52 9,931$ 14,750$ 2,400$ 18,865$ 1,000$ -$ 29,796$
2 28 5,710$ 4,800$ 5,280$ 1,500$ -$ 12,490$
2 16 3,173$ 2,500$ 400$ 3,190$ -$ -$ 6,363$
2 9 1,850$ 800$ 880$ -$ -$ 2,730$
1 29 6,032$ -$ 3,500$ -$ 9,532$
2 52 11,015$ 600$ 3,200$ 4,180$ -$ -$ 15,195$
2 34 6,882$ -$ -$ -$ 6,882$
2 40 8,154$ -$ -$ -$ 8,154$
2 28 5,664$ 5,000$ 5,500$ -$ -$ 11,164$
2 42 8,629$ 1,600$ 1,600$ 1,600$ 5,280$ -$ -$ 13,909$
4 50 9,509$ 1,500$ 1,650$ 1,500$ -$ 12,659$
4 20 3,419$ 200$ 200$ 440$ -$ -$ 3,859$
0 0 0 0 27 422 84,553$ 3,700$ 7,500$ 1,800$ 5,000$ 15,550$ 2,400$ 5,200$ 18,750$ 8,000$ 3,820$ -$ -$ -$ 78,892$ 8,000$ -$ 171,445$
2 12 2,417$ -$ -$ -$ 2,417$
2 26 5,072$ 1,600$ 1,760$ -$ -$ 6,832$
2 26 5,072$ 1,600$ 1,760$ -$ -$ 6,832$
2 38 7,012$ -$ -$ -$ 7,012$
2 16 2,613$ -$ -$ -$ 2,613$
2 48 8,213$ -$ -$ -$ 8,213$
2 78 13,707$ 16,000$ 7,640$ 26,004$ -$ 144$ 39,855$
2 17 3,211$ 400$ 440$ -$ 72$ 3,723$
2 14 2,831$ 800$ 880$ -$ -$ 3,711$
2 44 8,301$ -$ -$ 144$ 8,445$
2 24 4,866$ 800$ 880$ -$ -$ 5,746$
1 8 1,385$ 56,250$ 61,875$ -$ 72$ 63,332$
2 57 10,882$ 18,350$ 3,600$ 24,145$ -$ -$ 35,027$
2 38 7,503$ 3,200$ 3,520$ -$ 144$ 11,167$
2 33 6,241$ 800$ 3,000$ 4,180$ -$ -$ 10,421$
2 18 3,761$ -$ -$ -$ 3,761$
8 60 10,727$ 200$ 400$ 400$ 1,100$ -$ 36$ 11,863$
4 48 9,085$ 1,500$ 1,650$ 2,500$ -$ 13,235$
2 20 3,791$ 200$ 220$ -$ 18$ 4,029$
0 0 0 0 45 625 116,689$ 5,500$ 1,200$ 1,200$ -$ 19,150$ 6,600$ 3,200$ 56,250$ 16,000$ 7,640$ -$ -$ -$ 128,414$ 2,500$ 630$ 248,233$
2 14 2,770$ 200$ 220$ -$ -$ 2,990$
4 38 7,270$ 800$ 880$ -$ 144$ 8,294$
2 60 11,695$ 800$ 800$ 1,600$ 6,400$ 6,400$ 17,600$ -$ 288$ 29,583$
2 48 8,650$ -$ -$ 288$ 8,938$
4 38 7,018$ 400$ 400$ 1,600$ 1,600$ 4,400$ -$ -$ 11,418$
2 16 3,169$ 800$ 800$ 200$ 1,980$ -$ -$ 5,149$
124 22,768$ -$ -$ 576$ 23,344$
220 41,643$ -$ -$ 576$ 42,219$
65 12,608$ 3,600$ 3,600$ 7,920$ -$ -$ 20,528$
8 2 62 13,314$ 400$ 400$ 1,600$ 2,640$ -$ -$ 15,954$
2 21 3,936$ 1,600$ 1,600$ 3,520$ -$ -$ 7,456$
66 13,032$ 4,000$ 4,400$ -$ 288$ 17,720$
92 18,236$ -$ -$ 288$ 18,524$
20 3,709$ -$ -$ 288$ 3,997$
4 44 8,660$ 800$ 800$ 1,760$ -$ -$ 10,420$
4 28 5,880$ -$ -$ -$ 5,880$
4 28 6,153$ -$ -$ -$ 6,153$
4 46 9,261$ 400$ 400$ 800$ 1,760$ -$ -$ 11,021$
40 120 21,260$ -$ -$ -$ 21,260$
4 56 11,189$ 400$ 400$ 800$ 1,760$ -$ 144$ 13,093$
8 60 10,727$ 200$ 800$ 800$ 1,980$ -$ 36$ 12,743$
4 48 9,085$ 1,500$ 1,650$ 3,500$ -$ 14,235$
2 20 3,791$ 200$ 220$ -$ 18$ 4,029$
8 0 0 0 94 1334 255,824$ 4,300$ 3,200$ 3,600$ -$ 14,800$ 14,800$ 5,600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,600$ 52,690$ 3,500$ 2,934$ 314,948$
Total
USF (ROW)ESA/CRC Ott SakaiTownsend
Controls
Architects
West
Shannon &
Wilson
Permit
Survey
Geophys
SurveyStenselRichwineVisionRossoIndustrial
Systems
Subconsultants
Subconsultant
Total with Markup Expenses CADD Units
$18/hr
City of Pasco, WA
December 2019
Pasco WWTP Fee Estimate_12.31.2019.xlsx
Murraysmith
WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
3 of 4Page 109 of 111
WWTP IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE 1
City of Pasco, WA
PROPOSED FEE ESTIMATE
LABOR CLASSIFICATION (HOURS)
Construction
Manager VIII Inspector II
Principal
Engineer V
Principal
Engineer VI Admin. II Hours Labor
$216 $111 $248 $257 $97
$227 $117 $260 $270 $102
Machan Anderson, S.Van Meter Perry Thurston
Total
USF (ROW)ESA/CRC Ott SakaiTownsend
Controls
Architects
West
Shannon &
Wilson
Permit
Survey
Geophys
SurveyStenselRichwineVisionRossoIndustrial
Systems
Subconsultants
Subconsultant
Total with Markup Expenses CADD Units
$18/hr
24 84 15,443$ -$ -$ -$ 15,443$
24 368 65,134$ -$ -$ 720$ 65,854$
24 92 15,868$ 18,000$ 19,800$ -$ 432$ 36,100$
24 342 64,814$ 2,000$ 2,200$ -$ 1,080$ 68,094$
24 784 149,381$ 5,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 5,000$ 33,000$ -$ 2,880$ 185,261$
24 408 76,768$ 30,000$ 30,000$ 66,000$ -$ -$ 142,768$
24 132 23,919$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 13,200$ -$ -$ 37,119$
26 242 49,604$ 1,600$ 2,100$ 2,100$ 1,600$ 1,600$ 2,400$ 12,540$ 2,500$ -$ 64,644$
8 96 19,933$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 400$ 800$ 3,080$ -$ -$ 23,013$
32 60 8 160 28,182$ 600$ 600$ 400$ 400$ 800$ 3,080$ -$ -$ 31,262$
32 60 0 0 210 2708 509,046$ 7,000$ 13,100$ 13,100$ 5,000$ 38,400$ 38,400$ 22,000$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 152,900$ 2,500$ 5,112$ 669,558$
6 21 3,861$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,861$
6 92 16,283$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 180$ 16,463$
6 23 3,967$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,950$ -$ 108$ 9,025$
6 86 16,204$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,200$ -$ 270$ 18,674$
6 196 37,345$ 1,250$ 2,400$ 2,400$ 1,250$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 8,030$ -$ 720$ 46,095$
6 102 19,192$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,500$ 7,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 16,500$ -$ -$ 35,692$
6 33 5,980$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,500$ 1,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,300$ -$ -$ 9,280$
7 61 12,401$ 400$ 400$ 400$ -$ 400$ 400$ 600$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,860$ 2,000$ -$ 17,261$
0 0 0 0 49 613 115,233$ 1,650$ 2,800$ 2,800$ 1,250$ 9,400$ 9,400$ 5,100$ 2,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 37,840$ 2,000$ 1,278$ 156,351$
4 2 42 8,318$ 400$ 400$ 800$ 400$ 800$ 16,000$ 20,680$ 500$ -$ 29,498$
2 2 22 4,261$ 400$ 400$ 800$ 200$ 800$ 8,000$ 11,660$ 500$ -$ 16,421$
2 2 22 4,261$ 400$ 400$ 1,600$ 200$ 1,600$ 8,000$ 13,420$ 500$ -$ 18,181$
8 2 74 15,063$ 800$ 800$ 3,200$ 400$ 3,200$ 20,000$ 31,240$ 500$ -$ 46,803$
2 2 22 4,261$ 400$ 400$ 800$ 200$ 800$ 6,000$ 9,460$ 500$ -$ 14,221$
18 0 0 0 10 182 36,164$ -$ 2,400$ 2,400$ -$ 7,200$ 1,400$ 7,200$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 58,000$ 86,460$ 2,500$ -$ 125,124$
4 4 18 4,380$ 1,600$ 1,600$ 800$ 4,400$ -$ 36$ 8,816$
8 8 36 8,759$ 3,200$ 3,200$ 1,600$ 8,800$ 500$ 72$ 18,131$
12 12 54 13,139$ 4,800$ 1,800$ 2,400$ 9,900$ 500$ 108$ 23,647$
32 32 144 35,036$ 12,800$ 12,800$ 6,400$ 35,200$ -$ 288$ 70,524$
8 8 36 8,759$ 3,200$ 3,200$ 1,600$ 8,800$ -$ 72$ 17,631$
0 0 64 64 0 288 70,073$ -$ 25,600$ 22,600$ -$ -$ 12,800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 67,100$ 1,000$ 576$ 138,749$
32 6,594$ 15,000$ 16,500$ 500$ -$ 23,594$
96 20,042$ 3,200$ 3,520$ 500$ -$ 24,062$
112 23,751$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 15,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 38,500$ 2,500$ -$ 64,751$
12 60 13,469$ 1,500$ 1,500$ 1,500$ 1,500$ 6,600$ 5,000$ -$ 25,069$
4 56 10,613$ -$ 500$ -$ 11,113$
48 9,416$ 31,000$ 34,100$ 500$ -$ 44,016$
44 8,022$ 21,796$ 23,976$ 500$ -$ 32,498$
0 0 12 0 4 448 91,909$ 1,500$ 6,500$ 24,700$ 16,500$ 5,000$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 21,796$ 31,000$ -$ 123,196$ 10,000$ -$ 225,105$
2 26 4,857$ -$ 1,000$ -$ 5,857$
8 8 104 20,177$ 400$ 400$ 2,200$ 2,200$ 3,000$ 800$ 9,900$ -$ 288$ 30,365$
2 26 4,857$ -$ 500$ -$ 5,357$
8 0 0 0 12 156 29,891$ -$ 400$ 400$ -$ 2,200$ 2,200$ 3,000$ 800$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 9,900$ 1,500$ 288$ 41,579$
68 60 77 65 469 7763 1,524,425$ 26,050$ 62,700$ 72,600$ 27,750$ 114,100$ 94,600$ 53,700$ 79,800$ 24,000$ 11,460$ 21,796$ 31,000$ 59,600$ 747,072$ 39,000$ 11,070$ 2,321,567$
City of Pasco, WA
December 2019
Pasco WWTP Fee Estimate_12.31.2019.xlsx
Murraysmith
WWTP Improvements, Phase 1
4 of 4Page 110 of 111
Personnel:
Billing Classifications 2020 Rates Billing Classifications
Principal Engineer VI $270 Construction Manager VIII $227
Principal Engineer V $260 Construction Manager VII $219
Principal Engineer IV $250 Construction Manager VI $203
Principal Engineer III $239 Construction Manager V $188
Principal Engineer II $230 Construction Manager IV $178
Principal Engineer I $222 Construction Manager III $162
Professional Engineer IX $212 Construction Manager II $150
Engineering Designer IX $204 Construction Manager I $133
Professional Engineer VIII $202 Inspector VII $188
Engineering Designer VIII $193 Inspector VI $172
Professional Engineer VII $191 Inspector V $156
Engineering Designer VII $184 Inspector IV $145
Professional Engineer VI $182 Inspector III $129
Engineering Designer VI $175 Inspector II $117
Professional Engineer V $171 Inspector I $100
Engineering Designer V $164 Technician IV $155
Professional Engineer IV $161 Technician III $139
Engineering Designer IV $161 Technician II $120
Professional Engineer III $157 Technician I $101
Engineering Designer III $157 Administrative III $110
Engineering Designer II $143 Administrative II $101
Engineering Designer I $132 Administrative I $89
Project Expenses:
CADD Hardware/Software $18.00/hour
Modeling and GIS Hardware/Software $10.00/hour
Mileage Then-current IRS Rate
Postage and Delivery Services At Cost
Printing and Reproduction At Cost
Travel, Lodging, and Subsistence At Cost
Outside Services:
2020 SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
Labor will be invoiced by staff classification at the following hourly rates, which are valid from January 1, 2020 through
December 31, 2020. After this period, the rates are subject to adjustment.
Expenses incurred that are directly attributable to the project will be invoiced at actual cost. These expenses include the
following:
Outside technical, professional, and other services will be invoiced at actual cost-plus 10 percent to cover administration and
overhead.
2020OR/SW WA/ID/CO MURRAYSMITH ConfidentialPage 111 of 111