Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019.06.10 Council Workshop PacketWorkshop Meeting AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. June 10, 2019 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 3 - 7 (a) Downtown Pasco Development Authority Funding Agreement 8 - 37 (b) PSD 2018 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report 38 - 69 (c) Presentation - WWTP Facility Plan Update 70 - 109 (d) 2020-2025 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan 110 - 124 (e) Foster Wells Force Main Update & Agreement 125 - 138 (f) Code Amendment: Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA2018-008) 139 - 151 (g) Code Amendment: Special Permits (MF# CA2019-008) 152 - 161 (h) Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) Risk Pool Update Presentation to Council by Justin Tucker Safety/Training Specialist 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 7. ADJOURNMENT. REMINDERS: 1. Tuesday, June 11, 3:00-4:30 p.m. - PPFD Special Meeting - Conference Room 1 Page 1 of 161 Workshop Meeting June 10, 2019 (Councilmember Maloney, Rep.; Mayor Watkins, Alt.) 2. Thursday, June 13, 7:00-8:00 a.m. - BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee - Cousin's Restaurant (Councilmember Alvarado, Rep.; Councilmember Serrano, Alt) 3. Thursday, June 13 7:00-8:00 p.m. - Ben-Franklin Transit Board - Transit Facility (Mayor Watkins, Rep.; Councilmember Alvarado, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability. (Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad.) Page 2 of 161 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 4, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19 FROM: Michael Morales, Deputy Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Downtown Pasco Development Authority Funding Agreement I. REFERENCE(S): Extension of DPDA Funding Agreement through December 31, 2019 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Consistent with the adopted 2019-2020 biennial budget. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City Council approved an extension of the DPDA funding agreement through June 30, 2019 in December 2018. The temporary extension was recommended in lieu of the two year agreement because the DPDA Executive Director resigned December 14, 2018, and the board of directors and staff believed that it would be beneficial for a new Executive Director to review and possible renegotiate some terms of a two year agreement. Since that time, the DPDA has conducted a search for a new Executive Director. While a broad range of qualified applications were submitted, before the finalist interviews could be conducted, two applicants accepted other positions and the third applicant withdrew their application from consideration. The DPDA hiring committee has recommended that the search be suspended and reopened in the 3rd Quarter of 2019. In the interim, the Operations Manager will continue to serve with the responsibilities and authority of the Executive Director. For these reasons, the DPDA board and staff are in agreement that an extension of the agreement through the end of 2019 is in the best interest of the organization and its future Executive Director. Page 3 of 161 When the DPDA was formed, Council recognized that the DPDA would have operational expenses exceeding revenues and most recently approved the latest funding agreement with the DPDA, allocating an annual amount of $100,000 for 2017 and 2018 to supplement their revitalization efforts. The extension of the agreement for 2019 will continue at the same funding level as 2018, and was included in the 2019-20 biennial budget. V. DISCUSSION: Council discussion of this approach is welcome. Page 4 of 161 DOWNTOWN PASCO DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FUNDING AGREEMENT T H IS AGREEMENT is m ade and e nt er ed into this .;?I day of f\.lov.embe C 20 16, b y and between the C it y of Pasco, Washington, a Muni c ipal Co rporation , herein after referre d to as "City," and the Downtown Pasco Develo pment Authority, a no n-profi t Was hin gto n Corporatio n , h erein a fter refe rred t o as "DPDA ." WH EREAS , the City Council desires to foster re v italiz ation of the downtown bus iness area and created the Downtown P asco Developme nt Authority (DPDA) in December 2 010 under Ordinance No. 3985, with th e ex pectation of prov iding a three-yea r funding commitment to permit the n ew agency to establi s h operations and demonstrate it s ability to fulfill the r evitali zati o n goals enunciated in Ordinance No. 3985 a nd the DPDA C h a rter; and WH EREAS , DPDA h as received a certificate of incorporation from the State of Was hington as a non-profit corporation; and WHEREAS, DPDA h as organi z ed and developed operating procedures, hired an initi a l and a replacement executive directo r, reinitiated public events in D owntown Pasco (Cinco d e Mayo and th e Fiery Foods Festival), undertake n m a n age m ent of th e Pasco Farmers Market a nd Pasco Commercial Kitchen, b eca m e a 50l(c) (3) o rgani zation, became a certified Was hingto n State Main Street organization, conducted se veral business educatio n classes and D ownto w n c lean-up events, o rgani z ed and implemented a Peanuts Park r efurbi shme nt and (with C it y financial ass is ta nce) completed a 5 year Strategic Work Pl a n in c ludin g web s ite revisio ns and "branding;" and WHERE AS, DPDA ta sks for 2 01 7 and 20 18 includ e impl e m entatio n of the "Passport to Pasco Reward s Program," esta bli shm ent of a scholarship grant progra m consistent w ith th e DPDA 's 50l(c)(3) status , initiating and completing a Downtown C u stomer Survey and Downtown Pasco calendar; comple ting re staurant recruitment for vacant D owntown busi ness sp ace; creating a nd maintaining a Do w ntown Property In vent o r y ; bus iness outreach effo rts including a m ark eting/fundrai s ing pro gram and an a l ys is of th e fea s ibility of a "year round" Farmers Market ; initiating a nd fillin g a p os iti o n for su st a inable fundrai s ing and other tasks id e ntifi ed in the 5 Year Strategic W ork Plan; and WHE REAS , DPDA lias r eques ted th at additi o n a l C ity funding b e made ava il able to develop reso urces to eventually reduce th e amount of th e C it y subs id y ; NOW THEREFORE, IN CON SID ERA TION of th e mutua l covenants conta ined h erein a nd other va luable co nsi d eration, it i s agreed as fo ll ows: Section 1: DPDA Responsibi,ities The DPDA sh a ll conduct its act ivi ti es and efforts that further th e purpo se of the DPDA as identified in Pasco Ordinance 3985 and Article IV of it s Ch arter to in cl ud e but not be limited to: • Rev iew of C it y pl ans an d policies. T h e DPDA sh a ll r eview exis ting and evolvin g C it y land use and capital improvement plans a nd policies affecting th e Dow ntow n Area a nd a dv ise the c it y of appropriate co n siderations. D PDA Funding Agreement -1 Page 5 of 161 • Facade Impro vement Program. The DPDA s hall pro vide information, appli ca ti ons a nd profession a l assistance t o D owntown Area prope rty owners wishing to participa te in an approved and funde d Communit y Development Block Grant fa9a de program . • Promotio n a l Events. The DPDA s hould conduc t o r implement an additional promo ti o n a l or s p ecial e vent in a dd it ion to C inco de Mayo and th e Fiery Foods Fes tival th at con trib ute to the s uccess of the D ow nt own Area or oth e r wise ad van ce th e goal s of t he DPDA . • Financing Strategy. In co ll aboration w ith C ity staff and/or other professionals, the DPDA will d evelo p a comprehens ive in vento r y of public and pri vate capital and developme nt financin g tool s and in centi ves that may be avail abl e to foster and s upport its re vita li z ation effo rt s. T h ese should includ e tax credits or other incenti ves and identifi cati o n of infras tructure and o th e r pub li c capital investme nts that may be necessary to suppo rt pri va t e redevelopment projects. • Marketing. The DPDA s h a ll dev elop a s trategy to identify a nd promote econo mi c v it a lity of th e Downtown Area including the opportunities associated w ith the Farmer's Market and Sp ecialty Kitchen . These strategies m ay include: creation of a Downtown Cale ndar, quarterly business meetings for Downtown bus inesses , res ta urant recruitment for vacant or available properties a nd completion of th e D owntown Survey. • Farmer's Market and P asco Specialty Kitche n. The DPDA sh a ll optimi ze the opportunities associated wi th th e Farmer's Market and Specialty Kitchen to increase economic acti v ity a nd promote recogniti o n of the Dow ntown . Operation of th ese fac ilities mus t be in accordance with the associated lease agreem e nt. Repo rt s: A fo rmal prese ntatio n t o the C ity Coun c il b y the DPDA board sh a ll b e gi ven on o r b efore March I each year. T h e DPDA s h a ll deli ver quarterly written status reports to t he Pa sco City Manager detailing th e activ ities , accompli shments and fin an c ia l s ta tu s of th e DPDA. Section 2: City Responsibilities T h e C it y of Pasco w ill remit to DPDA o r it s des i g n ated bank up t o $25,000 per qu arter b y th e I O'h day of the firs t month of said quarter. Section 3: Term This agreem e nt sh a ll be effective January I , 20 17 and sh a ll ex pire on Decemb er 3 1, 20 18; prov ided , however, either pa11y m ay termina te th e agreement w ith at least 180 d ays w ritte n noti ce deli vered to the President of the DPDA or th e Pasco C ity Manager. It i s furth e r provided t ha t thi s agreement i s predicated o n the DPDA maintaining its Main S t reet st a tu s fo r calendar year s 20 17 and 20 18 a nd th e C ity's contri bution, as d escribed in Section 2, is d eem ed e li gi bl e for Main Street tax c r edits by the State D epartment of R evenue. Should the DPD A become in e li gibl e for Main Street tax c redi ts, thi s Agreement may be r eturned to the Pasco C it y Counci l for determining its co ntinuati on. Section 4: General Provisions For th e purpose of thi s Agreem ent, tim e is of th e essence. Failure of the DPD A to either provide th e accountin g or rem it disallowed fund s a s requ ired h e rei n s ha ll con stitu te a breach of this agreement. T h e r e medi es avail able to th e Ci ty s h a ll include but n ot b e limited to , return of DPDA Fu nding A g re e m en t -2 Page 6 of 161 all fund s delivered to the DPDA an d d e nial of the right of the DPDA to apply for any future funding. In the event of a di sp ut e regarding the enforcement, breach, default or interpre ta ti on of this Agreement, the parties sh a ll first meet in a good faith effort to reso lve such di spute. In the eve nt th e di sp ute cannot be resol ved b y agree m ent of the parti es, said di spute s hall be res o lved by arb itration purs uant to R CW 7.04A, as a m ended, and the Mandatory Arbitration Rul es (MAR); ven ue sh a ll b e placed in Franklin County, Washington , the laws of the State of Washington sh a ll appl y; and the prevailing p arty s h all be entitled to its reasonable a ttorn ey fees and costs. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto ha ve caused this agreement to be executed this a I 'day of Nch/-<Jm {oe v '2016. C ITY OF PASCO DPDA Fund ing A greement -3 DOWNTOWN PASCO D EVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1 cob Gonzalez , (;lsid e nt Page 7 of 161 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 3, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: PSD 2018 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report I. REFERENCE(S): School District Letter of Transmittal PSD 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Update Proposed Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In January of 2011 the Pasco School District (PSD) informed City Council that there was no longer the capacity to accommodate increased student enrollment due do residential growth in the community. The District requested both the City and County consider including the District’s Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) within their respective Comprehensive Plans and adopt a school impact fee. Council incorporated the District’s Capital Facilities Plan in the City’s Comprehensive Plan in February of 2012 and in March of 2012 adopted Ordinance 4046 (establishing school impact fees). An Interlocal Agreement for implementation and processing of those fees was also approved by both the District and the City. The current impact fees established by Council through Ordinance 4046 are $4,700 (of this amount $17 is retained by the City for offsetting administrative costs) per single family unit and $4,525 per multi-family unit. One of the stipulations of the Interlocal Agreement is that the District provide a report to the City on the impact fees including the source and amount of all monies received Page 8 of 161 and the public improvements that were financed in whole or in part by the fees. This report is prepared each year by the PSD. The terms of the Interlocal Agreement also require the City to review and consider biennial updates of the District’s CFP and if appropriate, incorporate the updated CFP into our own capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. City Council considered the District's 2018 CFP update at the Workshop Meeting of May 14, 2018 and a regular Council meeting of May 21, 2018. At the Workshop, there was discussion relating to County - issued building permits and the relationship to the School Impact Fee. Council reasoned it would be appropriate to defer action on the District's CFP update until a track record of the District's efforts to collect school impact fees from County developments was established. Since that action in May of last year, County - issued building permits for new homes outside the City limits but within the PSD has dramatically fallen off and there is no empirical evidence to support the success of the District's efforts. In addition, the City staff has since established conditions relating to use and extension of City water that include payment of applicable impact fees and conformance with City development regulations in a variety of circumstances. V. DISCUSSION: The District’s updated CFP contains a revised inventory of capital facilities - recognizing the expansion of capacity as a result of the 2017 bond election, subsequent new elementary and middle school construction and reconfiguration of the classes attending middle schools. Forecast enrollment figures for the next 6 years show that the District will increase a total (K through Grade 12) of approximately 3000 students. The 2018 District CFP Update and impact fee calculation contains revised new facility costs per dwelling unit based on the forecast student growth, the facilities that are needed to serve that growth and the estimated costs for those facilities. The newly calculated impact fee amounts (based on the accepted state-wide formula used in Ordinance 4046 adopted in 2012) for single family dwellings is $5,770 and for multi - family dwellings is $6,135. The District is not requesting an increase or change in the amount of the established school impact fees of $4,700 per single family unit and $4,525 per multi-family unit at this time. Per State law, the District is precluded from using school impact fees for projects that are not included as a part of the capital facilities element of an adopted Comprehensive Plan. In this case, the District’s 2018 CFP includes a fourth high school as a growth- related project and the District is hoping to use impact fee revenue to pay for a portion of this project (including a current need to pay for site studies relating to school development of the PSD property on Burns RD). However, the District is precluded from using impact fees for this purpose until the City adopts the District’s 2018 CFP Page 9 of 161 update by reference in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Although the District's protocol for seeking school mitigation fees under the State Environmental Policy Act outside the City limits has not been squarely tested, City staff believes that the District’s strategic use of the State Environmental Policy Act and the current process of conditioning extension of City utilities guarantee that applicable mitigation fees will be paid for residential development within the County. Staff recommends Council's favorable consideration of the District's request for inclusion of the latest CFP into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Page 10 of 161 Pasco School District #1 C. L. Booth Education Service Center 1215 W. Lewis Street • Pasco, Washington 99301 Board of Directors • (509) 546-2801 • FAX (509) 543-6781 Equal Opportunity Employer May 10, 2018 Mayor and Members of the Pasco City Council 525 North 3rd Ave Pasco, WA 99301 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: On behalf of the Pasco School District Board of Directors, I am writing to thank you for your ongoing support of Pasco Public Schools, through among other things, the adoption and implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance (Ordinance 4046). As required by the Ordinance, the District has updated its Capital Facilities Plan. We are submitting the enclosed 2018 Update of the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan with a request that you continue to collect school impact fees in the amount that was adopted in 2012. Going forward, enrollment in the District is expected to continue to increase, with the majority of the growth occurring in grades K-6. As reflected in the enclosed CFP Update, the District will serve the forecast growth by completing the 2017 bond projects to construct new schools, adjust portable classroom locations, and make improvements to Support Services to meet capacity demands. The estimated cost for these improvements is over $150,000,000. The District will pay for the improvements with bond proceeds, state construction fund dollars and impact fees, as reflected in the finance plan in the CFP Update. We understand that the imposition of school impact fees may be unpopular with some of the people or organizations we are all elected to represent. At the same time, continued collection of school impact fees is necessary to provide school facilities for students living in new housing. The entire community benefits when we have quality schools, and the District relies on impact fees to help provide those schools. We appreciate our collaboration with the City through adoption and implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance. We will renew our request to have a similar ordinance adopted in Franklin County and until such time as the County adopts a school impact fee ordinance, we will continue to request that every new residential development in the County mitigate impacts on schools. Page 11 of 161 Celebrating academics, diversity and innovation. If you have any questions regarding the District’s 2018 CFP Update, or our request and need for school impact fees, please contact Superintendent Whitney at 509.546.2800. Sincerely, Steven Christensen, President Board of Directors Pasco School District No. 1 cc: Michelle Whitney, Superintendent Dave Zabell, City Manager Page 12 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 1 of 23 May 2018 PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 2018 UPDATE TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF DIRECTORS Steve Christensen, President Amy Phillips, Vice President Sherry Lancon, Member Scott Lehrman, Member Aaron Richardson, Member SUPERINTENDENT Michelle Whitney Adopted. by the Pasco School Board on May 8, 2018 Page 13 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 2 of 23 May 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction……………………………….....3 Section 2 Program Standards…………………………6 Section 3 Capital Facilities Inventory………………..8 Section 4 Enrollment Projections & Capacity…….10 Section 6 Financing Plan……………………………..12 Section 7 School Impact or Mitigation Fees………13 Appendices Appendix A—Charts & Supporting Data……….15 Building Capacity………………………….16 Building Condition Scores……………….17 Projected Enrollments…………………….18 Needed Capacity…………………………...19 Necessary Improvements & Costs……..20 Capital Facilities Financing Plan………..21 Appendix B—Impact Fee Calculations…………22 2018 Impact Fee……………………………23 Page 14 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 3 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the 2018 Update to the Capital Facilities Plan The Pasco School District (the “District”) in 2011 first adopted a Capital Facilities Plan (the “2011 CFP”) in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW (the “GMA”), and City of Pasco Ordinance 4046 (the “School Impact Fee Ordinance”). The City of Pasco adopted the 2011 CFP on April 16, 2012, and adopted updates to the CFP in 2014 and 2016. Section 3.133.025 of the School Impact Fee Ordinance describes the elements that must be addressed in the CFP. They include “the District’s standard of service, an inventory of facilities, capacity by grade span, a six year enrollment forecast, facility needs and costs, a f inance plan and calculation of the school impact fees.” Once the CFP with these elements is adopted, the Ordinance says “[t]he District shall file an update to its capital facility plan at least once every two years.” And, “[a]t lease once every two years, commencing on April 15, 2014, the City Council shall review and consider the District submitted capital facilities plan update.” This 2018 Update is submitted to comply with the above requirements in the School Impact Fee Ordinance. The Update supplements and updates the core information in the 2011 CFP. The 2018 update also includes an updated calculation for the District’s school impact fees. B. Changes in the Pasco School District The District now serves 18,101 students (OSPI Form 1049, October 1, 2017), an increase of 2,111 students since 2012. Steady residential development within the district’s boundaries continues. The latest demographics study (MGT of America, 2017, Chart 3 herein) projects that residential growth will continue at a moderate rate over the six-year planning period and beyond. Since 2012, the City of Pasco has approved the construction of 1,925 single family units and 233 multi-family units (through March 2018). To construct all the improvements that are required to serve existing needs (including those from recent residential growth) and forecasted growth, the District asked its voters in November 2017 to approve a $99.5 million bond measure. The District’s voters passed the 2017 bond with a 60.07% yes vote (approval of a bond requires 60% yes votes). Previously, the last bond to pass was November 2013. This bond was developed with several strategies to significantly reduce the cost of the bond projects after the previous bond failed with a 48% yes vote in April 2011. The most significant measure was to reconfigure grade level groupings to delay the construction of a more expensive per-pupil middle school. District facilities planning to provide capacity to serve students has since been based upon this and other measures taken after the April 2011 bond election failure. • A community task force was engaged to provide recommendations to the board of directors regarding strategies for handling enrollment growth. The task force considered multi-track/year-round options, and recommended another less expensive bond be submitted to voters as soon as possible. • Based on the task force recommendations, the next bond in February 2013 was developed with the direction that an additional elementary school would be built Page 15 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 4 of 23 May 2018 because it was less expensive than a middle school, and the District would use the additional elementary capacity to house 6th grade students at the elementary level instead of the middle level. • The three elementary schools approved in the 2013 bond opened in the 2014-2015 school year (one school) and the 2015-2016 school year (two schools). The added capacity allowed the District to complete the plan to transition to a K-6 and 7-8 grade configuration in 2015-2016. The November 2017 bond will fund additional capacity at the elementary level with two new schools and at the middle level with funding to construct Middle School #4 and replace and expand Stevens Middle School. In June 2017 the District’s Community Builders Group recommended these projects for the bond, with the understanding that the additional middle level capacity would cause the district to transition 6th grade back to the middle school. The District has continued to engage in cost-saving measures in facilities planning, and will continue to use cost-reduction strategies and District construction standards to save taxpayer dollars. Pasco School District’s construction costs have normally been lower than other school construction costs around the State of Washington. Examples of cost- reduction strategies includes the following: • Use property already owned by the district for school sites; • Use the updated Pasco design that has been built multiple times for Pasco schools, thereby saving A/E, construction and maintenance costs; • Curie and Whittier Elementary Schools share one playground, reducing the amount of land to be purchased; • Build larger elementary schools to reduce the total number needed and create efficiencies in operations; • Build schools to serve at least 50 years; • Maintain school buildings well to ensure they last several decades; and • Since middle school student enrollment was reduced in 2015 by keeping 6th grade at the elementary school, and elementary enrollments increased, unused portable classrooms on middle school campuses have been moved to provide temporary capacity at the elementary level. The voters of Washington state passed Initiative 1351 in 2014. The initiative imposes class size values as recommended by the and the Legislature’s Quality Education Council (QEC). The class size requirements have been implemented in part and delayed in part. Under the Supreme Court’s McCleary decision, the Legislature is under court order to fully fund basic K- 12 education, including the K-3 class size reductions. Initiative 1351 class sizes are reflected in Chart 1 and position the District for full legislative implementation. The District implemented All-Day Kindergarten (ADK) in every elementary school in the 2015- 2016 school year. The District added portable classrooms to meet this requirement. In Chart 2 in the Appendix, State scoring matrices show that Pasco School District is effectively maintaining its schools as a community investment and asset, according to a third Page 16 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 5 of 23 May 2018 party review. The schools’ adjusted maintenance score is significantly above its expected score for the facility’s age, demonstrating effective maintenance by the district. These data mean that they will last longer and be able to serve more students before needing to be replaced. Page 17 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 6 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 2 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARDS The District’s core and special program needs, which are used to define the standard of service, are addressed in the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan. The District has implemented K-3 class size reduction and All Day Kindergarten and is positioned to implement I-1351’s targets for grades 4-12 . Below is the District’s adopted educational program standards (or standard of service). A. Elementary Educational Program Standards The state is required to provide funding for a student-to-teacher ratio of 17-1 in grades K-3 (15-1 for high poverty schools), consistent with QEC recommendations, Initiative 1351, and McCleary. The class size of 15 will impact eleven elementary schools which qualify as high poverty. The remaining four elementary schools will be impacted by the class size of 17. Elementary Class Size Requirements-Initiative 1351 Grades K-3 Enacted by the Legislature Grades 4-12 Implementation Delayed Grade Levels Initiative 1351 Class Sizes District Contract Class Sizes High-Poverty Schools Non-High Poverty Schools 2017 K-1 15 17 24 2-3 15 17 27 4-6 25 28 4 22 5-6 23 Capt. Gray Markham Whittier McClintock Robinson Livingston Longfellow Angelou Chess Emerson Frost Twain Curie Franklin McGee B. Middle and High School Program Standards Secondary (Middle and High) school class size standards also are projected to be reduced to levels set by Initiative 1351 with recommendations to be mandated under McCleary as noted below. Page 18 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 7 of 23 May 2018 Secondary Class Size Requirements-Initiative 1351 Grades K-3 Enacted by the Legislature Grades 4-12 Implementation Delayed Grade Levels Initiative 1351 Class Size District Contract Class Size High-Poverty Schools Non-High Poverty Schools 2017 7-8 23 25 *30 9-12 23 25 *30 *Max Stevens MS 155/day Ochoa MS McLoughlin MS Pasco HS Chiawana HS New Horizons HS Page 19 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 8 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 3 CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY As described in the 2011-2017 CFP, the District’s facilities inventory establishes a baseline for determining the facilities necessary to accommodate future demand (student enrollment) at acceptable levels of service. Three schools have been added since the 2014 update to the CFP, resulting in an increase to the permanent capacity calculation. Elementary schools and middle schools will be added through 2023. The District will also move portables between schools and grade levels as additional capacity is needed. A. Capacity Calculation and Standard of Service The District’s Board of Directors directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of school building capacity in 2017. The purpose of the review was to ensure consistent, reasonable measures were being used to determine the capacity of each school building, and to provide a safe and equitable standard of service for students throughout the school system. Student safety has been a critical consideration for the District in determining this standard of service. In 2014 and again in 2018, the District conducted a comprehensive safety review of schools, including brick and mortar buildings and portable classrooms. It is the District’s goal to house students in permanent facilities with controlled points of access, which can be best accomplished by housing students in one contained brick and mortar building. Portable classrooms will continue to be used as a temporary solution to provide student housing. However, to achieve the desired standard of service to enhance student and staff safety, portable classrooms should not be counted in the District’s permanent classroom inventory. The state does not count portable classrooms when calculating a school district’s classroom inventory for purposes of eligibility for state assistance for construction. In the 2011-2017 CFP, the District counted some portables into the permanent capacity calculation after consultation with the City of Pasco. Based on the above considerations, however, the 2017 CFP update does not include portable classrooms in calculating permanent capacity but still recognizes the capacity purpose. B. Elementary Schools The District currently has fifteen (15) elementary schools. Thirteen (13) of these schools serve grades K-6, one (1) serves grades K-2, and one (1) serves grades 3-6. The fifteen (15) elementary schools provide capacity to serve 7,167 students in permanent capacity. As of October 1, 2017, there were 10,164 elementary students enrolled. There are 139 portable classrooms at the elementary schools providing additional capacity to house 2,489 students. Since 2014, the District has added 33 new portable classrooms as temporary capacity. This includes the modification of septic and water service at Markham elementary to allow expansion through the addition of portables which was completed in 2015. Two new elementary schools, providing additional capacity for 1,240 elementary students, will be constructed by 2023. The District purchased the former Pasco Senior Center and an adjacent vacant lot from the City in 2016 for the purpose of the converting the building into an early learning facility. The District Page 20 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 9 of 23 May 2018 pursued, and was granted, two capital appropriations from the state totaling $1.3 million dollars to help offset the costs. The Early Learning Center opened in January 2018, with designated programs transitioned to the Center by September 2018. In addition, the District has leased the former Kids World daycare facility on North 20th Avenue in Pasco to provide additional classrooms for early learning. These projects have allowed the District to provide additional capacity for K-6 students in elementary buildings by relocating early learning classes from the elementary buildings to the new facilities. C. Middle Schools The District has three middle schools serving grades 7-8. The middle schools provide permanent capacity to serve approximately 2,457 students. As of October 1, 2017, there were 2,693 students enrolled in those schools. There are 46 portable classrooms at the middle schools providing additional capacity to house 874 students. Since 2011, the District added sixteen (16) new portable classrooms as temporary capacity at the middle school level. Middle School #4 and the replacement and expansion of Stevens Middle School will add permanent capacity for approximately 995 students by 2023. The District also plans to add portable capacity at the middle school level during the six years of this CFP (either newly purchased or relocated from the elementary grade level). D. High Schools As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP, there are two traditional high schools serving grades 9-12. There is permanent capacity to serve 3,716 students in the high schools. As of October 1, 2017 there were 5,225 students enrolled. Pasco High School has additional capacity to serve students in (25) portable classrooms and Chiawana High School has additional capacity to serves students in 16 portable classrooms added to the campus in 2017. New Horizons High School moved into a leased brick and mortar building on the Columbia Basin College campus in 2017. The building capacity is 206. E. Support Facilities Bus parking has been expanded into the District’s maintenance lay-down yard at the Port of Pasco property (Building 210). The District leased additional space from the Port to replace the lost lay-down yard capacity, and is also leasing additional warehouse space. The November 2017 bond will provide funding for expansion of transportation and maintenance facilities. F. Land Inventory The District currently owns nine unimproved parcels, totaling approximately 146 acres. Two sites will be the location of schools from the 2017 bond, bringing the District’s total available unimproved property to 82 acres. The District plans to acquire additional property for future schools. Page 21 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 10 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 4 STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS AND CAPACITY BY GRADE SPAN A. Projected Student Enrollment Since 2016, the District received and reviewed four enrollment forecasts. For purposes of the 2018 CFP Update, the District is relying on the comprehensive forecast provided by MGT of America. See Appendix, Chart 3. In October 2011, there were 15,707 students enrolled in grades K-12. In October 2017, there were 18,101 students enrolled, which is an increase of 2,394 students. By 2023, the forecast predicts there will be 21,170 students enrolled in grades K-12, which is an additional 3,069 students over 2017. The District will need to add permanent and temporary capacity at the elementary and secondary levels to serve the growth. B. Capacity by Grade Span Current enrollment at each grade level is identified in Chart 1 , which provides the actual enrollment in District facilities as of October 1, 2017. Projected available student capacity was derived by subtracting projected student 2023 enrollment (Chart 3 ) from total existing October 2017 school capacity (Chart 1 ). Enrollment in grades K-8 is expected to grow by approximately 1,969 students by 2023. At the same time, class size standards have been reduced by the state, and further implementation of reduced class sizes is expected. Based on the forecast enrollment increase, and without considering planned projects (which will add a total of 2,235 new permanent K-8 seats), the District will need to add capacity at the K-8 level for 1,859 students. Enrollment in grades 9-12 is currently 5,225. High school enrollment is forecasted for continued growth, adding more than 1,100 students by 2023. The District has added capacity for additional students at New Horizons and Pasco High School. However, the District will need to add capacity for 1,839 students at the high school level. The current capacity in the existing schools and the capacity that is needed to serve forecast growth through 2023 was revised based on class size reduction targets and construction projects completed through the date of this CFP. Please see Chart 4 in the Appendix. Chart 4 does not consider capacity additions planned through 2023 and beyond. Page 22 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 11 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS To determine future facility needs, existing school program capacity was compared to projected enrollment throughout the six-year forecast period. See Section 4. In November 2017, the District’s voters passed a $99.5 million bond measure to help fund the construction of two new elementary schools, a new middle school, the expansion and replacement of Stevens Middle School, safety and health improvements at various schools, and improvements to the District’s transportation and maintenance facilities. See Chart 5, Appendix. The District expects that all of the new capacity projects will be complete no later than the 2023-24 school year. Portable classrooms will be used to provide temporary facilities while funding is secured to construct brick and mortar facilities. The new schools and portable classrooms will provide the needed capacity identified in Section 4 above. In addition to building schools that add capacity for growth, the District will make other improvements to serve students. The improvements will be constructed in phases and cannot occur until bonds are approved by the voters. The District will continue with long term facilities planning efforts using community recommendations to identify which projects should be prioritized. The District will continue to plan for needs beyond 2023. Chart 5 includes estimated permanent improvements and capacity conditioned on future funding. Future updates to this CFP will provide more specific information as to the District’s updated planning beyond the 2017 Bond projects. Page 23 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 12 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 6 CAPITAL FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN The District's ability to fund the planned improvements that will add capacity is dependent upon the passage of bond elections at a 60% supermajority and receipt of State Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds, also known as “state match” funds. Costs for improvements that add capacity are used to calculate school impact fees. School impact fees, or SEPA mitigation fees collected from some new development projects in unincorporated Franklin County, will be used to pay for a portion of the improvements that add capacity. The majority of the costs to construct the capacity improvements will be paid for with bonds and state match funds. See Section 6 of the 2011 CFP for a complete discussion regarding the framework for financing planned improvements. The District was not awarded a K-3 class size reduction grant as referenced in the 2016 update to the Capital Facilities Plan. Therefore, to serve growth and address class size reduction, the District plans to construct new schools and expand additional schools consistent with the funding identified in this CFP. In addition to construction of facilities to add capacity, the District also needs to acquire school sites for future construction, and must make a variety of improvements that are needed at existing facilities. A key Community Builders Group recommendation was to address capital facilities needs related to safety and health. The Capital Facilities Financing Plan in Chart 6 demonstrates how the District intends to fund new construction and improvements to school facilities during the six-year planning period. Page 24 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 13 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 7 SCHOOL IMPACT OR MITIGATION FEES The District’s ability to fund the improvements that are needed to serve forecast growth depends on new development contributing to the cost to build the schools that will serve the students that live in new housing. The District is collecting school impact fees from development in the City and will continue to request mitigation fees from developers in Franklin County (and continue to request that Franklin County adopt a GMA-based school impact fee ordinance). The District files annual reports with the City regarding the use of the school impact fees. The District has calculated school impact fees using a standard school impact fee formula, adopted by the City of Pasco and many other Washington cities and counties, that complies with the Growth Management Act. The resulting figures are based on the District’s cost per dwelling unit to construct schools needed to serve new development. A student factor (or student generation rate) is used to identify the average cost per dwelling unit by measuring the average number of students generated by each housing type (single-family dwellings and multi- family dwellings). The District hires a consultant to update the student factor methodology based upon the last six years of residential development data within the District , as required by t he City of Pasco School Impact Fee Ordina nce. As required under the GMA, credits are applied in the formula to account for State School Construction Assistance funds to be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit. The costs of projects that do not add capacity are not included in the impact fee calculations. Furthermore, impact fees will not be used to address existing deficiencies. The following projects are included in the impact fee calculation: • New Elementary School (based on the average cost of Elementary 16 and 17); and • New Middle School. Please see Chart 6. Elementary #16, Elementary #17, Middle School #4, and the expanded capacity at Stevens Middle School are eligible for impact fee funding as growth related projects. The calculated impact fee amounts (reduced by 25%), in Appendix B, are $5,770 for each single family residence and $6,135 for each multi-family residence. However, the District is requesting the City continue collecting the current amounts which are: Single Family: $4,700 Multi Family: $4,525 The District began receiving impact fees from the City in 2012. Through December 2017, the District has received approximately $9,426,689 in impact fee revenue. Of that amount, $1,250,000 was used to reduce the principal of the 2013 bond, $2,208,772 was used to pay for a portion of the 2015-2016 portable classrooms, and $1,164,955 was spent to acquire land in 2017. The District plans to use remaining revenue for portables to accommodate enrollment, land acquisition, and reducing the cost of the 2017 Bond projects. The District will use future impact fees as allowed by law for growth-related impacts identified in the CFP. Page 25 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 14 of 23 May 2018 CONCLUSION The District continues to use a variety of strategies to plan, reduce costs, and mitigate the effects of student enrollment growth. Receipt of impact fees remains critical to ensuring the District can manage growth by providing sufficient student facilities. The forecast of steady enrollment growth over the next six years underscores the need to use a variety of financing measures, including the passage of bonds, expenditure from the General Fund, and impact fees/SEPA mitigation fees to meet the needs of the community. Page 26 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 15 of 23 May 2018 APPENDIX A Charts with Supporting Data Page 27 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 16 of 23 May 8, 2018 Chart 1 Building Capacity October 1, 2017 *Building Capacity is the number of classrooms multiplied by the weighted average I-1351 class size for non-high poverty schools, multiplied by a utilization factor to allow for planning time and other uses. Elementary Schools Grades Served Building Classrooms Building Capacity Temp Portable Classrooms Temp Portable Capacity Total Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017 Enrollment Gray K-6 25 449 10 180 35 629 551 Markham K-6 14 251 10 180 24 431 397 McGee K-6 22 388 14 251 36 639 666 Twain K-6 27 463 15 262 42 725 755 Angelou K-6 32 567 12 215 44 782 898 Livingston K-6 22 395 17 305 39 700 780 Whittier K-2 26 452 12 215 38 667 606 Robinson K-6 33 578 12 215 45 793 773 Emerson K-6 26 452 7 126 33 578 690 Longfellow K-6 24 416 4 72 28 488 466 Frost K-6 26 445 9 162 35 607 650 Chess K-6 27 477 9 162 36 639 533 Franklin K-6 35 614 6 108 41 722 804 McClintock K-6 34 596 2 36 36 632 754 Curie 3-6 36 624 0 0 36 624 841 Totals 409 7,167 139 2,489 548 9,656 10,164 Middle Schools Grades Served Building Classrooms Building Capacity Temp Portable Classrooms Temp Portable Capacity Total Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017 Enrollment McLoughlin 7-8 46 863 28 532 74 1,395 1,285 Stevens 7-8 38 740 12 228 50 968 708 Ochoa 7-8 44 854 6 114 50 968 700 Totals 128 2,457 46 874 174 3,331 2,693 High Schools Grades Served Building Classrooms Building Capacity Temp Portable Classrooms Temp Portable Capacity Total Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017 Enrollment Chiawana 9-12 109 1,984 16 300 125 2,284 2,717 Pasco 9-12 82 1,526 25 469 107 1,995 2,239 New Horizons 9-12 11 206 0 0 11 206 269 Totals 202 3,716 41 769 243 4,485 5,225 District Total 739 13,340 226 4,132 965 17,472 18,082 Page 28 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 17 of 23 May 2018 Chart 2 Pasco School District Asset Preservation Program 2017 Building Condition Scores OSPI 2015 2016 2017 Building Age in Years Current Draft Score by Age Adjusted B.C.E. Adjusted B.C.E. Adjusted B.C.E. Emerson 21 74 87.94 86.96 85.69 Frost 21 74 86.44 84.09 82.98 Franklin 4 95 100 100 99.06 McClintock 3 97 NA 98.52 97.69 Curie 3 97 NA 100 99.90 Chiawana High School 9 90 95.30 95.30 94.49 Delta High School 3 97 NA 95.56 96.10 “B.C.E.” is the Building Condition Evaluation score given by OSPI for those facilities in which State School Construction Assistance Program (state match) dollars were used. The Current Draft Score” is OSPI’s expected score for the age of the facility, given average use and maintenance. Pasco High School is no longer assigned a B.C.E. score for purposes of state reporting because of the age of the facility. However, the district continues to monitor and score Pasco High School for internal monitoring purposes. Page 29 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 18 of 23 May 2018 Chart 3 MGT of America Projected Enrollments Grade 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 K 1,455 1,480 1,491 1,530 1,520 1,528 1,521 1,539 1,552 1,558 1 1,475 1,519 1,502 1,585 1,617 1,646 1,664 1,682 1,693 1,726 2 1,465 1,437 1,463 1,581 1,644 1,674 1,694 1,703 1,736 1,754 3 1,424 1,449 1,458 1,579 1,616 1,656 1,668 1,689 1,701 1,731 4 1,526 1,524 1,587 1,687 1,741 1,781 1,809 1,820 1,847 1,869 5 1,547 1,568 1,565 1,709 1,748 1,782 1,810 1,837 1,856 1,880 6 1,484 1,506 1,538 1,565 1,674 1,716 1,713 1,774 1,792 1,822 7 1,443 1,524 1,491 1,540 1,515 1,574 1,600 1,620 1,672 1,715 8 1,298 1,299 1,436 1,415 1,469 1,489 1,516 1,557 1,596 1,619 9 1,430 1,520 1,498 1,581 1,613 1,484 1,455 1,492 1,478 1,555 10 1,332 1,316 1,458 1,509 1,513 1,526 1,536 1,512 1,574 1,618 11 1,304 1,426 1,430 1,441 1,526 1,608 1,631 1,681 1,718 1,783 12 1,297 1,286 1,411 1,474 1,592 1,707 1,762 1,790 1,819 1,824 TOTAL 18,479 18,854 19,328 20,195 20,788 21,170 21,380 21,697 22,034 22,454 Page 30 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 19 of 23 May 2018 Chart 4 2023 Student Capacity and Future Need Building Capacity 2017 Total Capacity (Permanent/Portable) 2017 Forecast Enrollment 2023 Needed Capacity 2023 Elementary (K-5) 7,167 9,656 10,066 410 Middle (6-8) 2,457 3,331 4,780 1,449 High (9-12) 3,638 4,485 6,324 1,839 “Building Capacity” is the number of classrooms multiplied by the weighted average I-1351 class size for non-high poverty schools, multiplied by a utilization factor to allow for planning time and other uses. “Forecast Enrollment 2023” is based on the enrollment forecast provided by MGT of America. “Needed Capacity” does not include new capacity planned for completion through 2023 or portable additions/relocations. Page 31 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 20 of 23 May 2018 Chart 5 Necessary Facility Improvements, Added Capacity and Costs 2018 Update 2017 BOND PROJECT ESTIMATES New Elementary School #16 620 $27,300,000 New Elementary School #17 620 $28,500,000 Stevens Middle School Replacement and Expansion 75 $42,700,000 New Middle School #4 920 $46,500,000 Land Acquisition 0 $2,000,000 Support Services Capital Improvements 0 $3,000,000 Health and Safety Capital Improvements 0 $1,700,000 Total 2017 Bond Project Estimates 2,235 $151,700,000 ESTIMATED PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS & CAPACITY CONDITIONED ON FUTURE BOND AND STATE ASSISTANCE New High School #3 1,800 $135,000,000 New Innovative High School TBD $38,000,000 Replace Livingston Elem. 200 $34,000,000 Replace McGee Elem. 200 $35,300,000 New Elementary School #18 600 $38,900,000 New Middle School #5 900 $56,800,000 Curie ES Expansion 80 $1,800,000 Land Acquisition (160 acres) 0 $12,160,000 Total Permanent Capacity 4,380 $351,960,000 TEMPORARY CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000 Total 460 $3,250,000 TOTALS 7,075 $506,910,000 Page 32 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 21 of 23 May 2018 Chart 6 Capital Facilities Financing Plan Project Estimates “State Match” refers to funds allocated by the State of Washington through the School Construction Assistance Program administered by OSPI. This number is an estimate of state matching funds and is subject to verification by OSPI. *The cost of bonds being used to finance the replacement of Stevens Middle School includes $3 million held over from 2013 bond which had been designated for Stevens Middle School Improvements. *The “portion TBD” of impact fee revenue used to fund the growth-related capacity projects included in the 2017 Bond Projects will be determined based upon impact fee revenue received from new development. Impact fee revenue may be able to offset debt service on the bonds and result in tax savings to the existing community. In particular, the District plans to use at least $2 million in school impact fees to reduce the cost of the 2017 Bond projects. These estimates will be adjusted accordingly in future updates to this CFP. Project Added Capacity Est. Cost Source of Funding Bonds State Match Impact/ Mitigation Fees General Fund Approved November 2017 Bond Projects and Other Improvements Elementary #16 620 $27,300,000 $18,700,000 $8,600,000 Portion TBD Elementary #17 620 $28,500,000 $19,900,000 $8,600,000 Portion TBD Stevens Middle School Replacement 75 $42,700,000 $24,100,000* $18,600,000 Portion TBD Middle School #4 920 $46,500,000 $37,800,000 $8,700,000 Portion TBD Safety & Health Improvements $1,700,000 $1,700,000 Transportation & Maintenance Improvements $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000 Portion TBD Land Acquisition $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Portion TBD Future Bond Projects (Subject to Future Planning & Board Approval) New High School #3 1,800 $135,000,000 $80,000,000 $50,000,000 Portion TBD New Innovative High School TBD $38,000,000 $23,900,000 $14,100,000 Replace Livingston Elem. 200 $34,000,000 $13,600,000 $20,400,000 Portion TBD Replace McGee Elem. 200 $35,300,000 $14,100,000 $21,200,000 Portion TBD Parent Partnership Program TBD $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Portion TBD New Elementary School #18 600 $38,900,000 $38,900,000 Portion TBD New Middle School #5 900 $56,800,000 $56,800,000 Portion TBD Curie ES Expansion 80 $1,800,000 1,800,000 Portion TBD Land Acquisition NA $12,160,000 Portion TBD Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000 Portion TBD Page 33 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix B, Page 22 of 23 May 2018 APPENDIX B IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Page 34 of 161 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix B, Page 23 of 23 May 2018 Page 35 of 161 RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO INCORPORATING THE PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT’S 2018 UPDATE OF THE CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN INTO THE CITY OF PASCO COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is required by State law to determine that adequate provisions are made in each subdivision, short plat, and other division of property used for residential purposes, including the adequacy of schools and playgrounds; and WHEREAS, the Pasco School District No. 1 by letter of January 11, 2011, placed the City on notice that due to escalating student population, it is unable to accommodate additional students that are incident to new developments of residential housing and has by Resolution No. 809 adopted its Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan demonstrating the need for additional classrooms to meet the anticipated demand of students residing within the new development areas of the City; and WHEREAS, in February 2012 the City amended the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of Pasco by incorporating the Pasco School District’s 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan into it; and WHEREAS, in March 2012 the City adopted School Impact Fees through Ordinance 4046 reflective of the cost per student for new facilities as described in the District’s 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the City and the Pasco School District have adopted an Interlocal Agreement that requires the District to submit an update of the Capital Facilities Plan every two years; and WHEREAS, the Interlocal Agreement requires the City to consider the update of the District’s Capital Facility Plan and if appropriate, incorporate the update into the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the revised information contained in the 2018 update of the District’s Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council after due consideration of the District’s request that the City continue to collect School Impact Fees as calculated by the 2011-2017 School District Capital Facilities Plan and as approved by Ordinance 4046; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: Incorporates the 2018 Update of the Pasco School District’s Capital Facilities Plan into the City of Pasco Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this ___ day of ______________, 2019. ________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor Page 36 of 161 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ _____________________________ Angela Pashon, Interim City Clerk Kerr Ferguson Law Group Page 37 of 161 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 3, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19 FROM: Steve Worley, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Presentation - WWTP Facility Plan Update I. REFERENCE(S): Draft Executive Summary of WWTP Facility Plan Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) provides physical and biological treatment of the collected incoming wastewater prior to discharge of disinfected water to the Columbia River. The facility operates under NPDES Permit WA-004496-2, which regulates discharge to Columbia River and is administered by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). The WWTP is located in the southeast region of the City. The facility was originally constructed in 1954 and has undergone a series of major and minor upgrades in the 1970s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010s to provide for additional capacity, application of new technology and replacement of some components having reached the end of useful life. The City’s current population is approximately 75,000 resulting in approximately 5.4 million gallons of wastewater per day being treated at the WWTP. . Page 38 of 161 V. DISCUSSION: As an Ecology-permitted facility approaches capacity (85%), a Facility Plan is required to determine future expansion needs. Further, approval by Ecology of a Facility Plan is a prerequisite to any improvement that would increase capacity or alter treatment processes at the facility. MurraySmith, an engineering consulting firm, has assisted staff in preparing the draft WWTP Facility Plan. The Plan was submitted to Ecology for their review in April 2019. The City has already received comments back from Ecology on the plan which are being addressed. Approval of the plan is anticipated in the very near future. The WWTP Facility Plan was developed in conformance with Chapter 173-240 Washington Administrative Code (WAC). The Plan assesses the current capacity and condition of the facility. In addition, projected flows and loadings were developed for the twenty horizon based on population, industrial, and commercial growth as projected by the City's Comprehensive Land Use planning efforts. Based on the aforementioned projections, loading to the WWTP is expected to approximately double by the 2040 planning horizon. The plan confirms that most of the major infrastructure components at the WWTP are at or approaching the end of useful life. Further, that several of those components are at or approaching maximum capacity along with other system deficiencies, such as the need for redundant systems which were not a requirement at the time the plant was constructed or during subsequent major upgrades. Accordingly, the plan recommends a series of projects to maintain reliable treatment entailing the replacement of numerous major components that have reached end of life, and to enhance their replacement to provide for increased capacity and treatment capabilities to adequately treat the 2040 projected flow and loading. The proposed improvements to the WWTP are based on a detailed evaluation of feasible alternatives, with recommendations for improvements that are cost-effective solutions for both near and long-term needs. The cost of these improvements is on the order of $70 million over the 20 year horizon much of which will be funded through a series of revenue bonds over the next two decades supported by rates. The majority of these costs would be required with or without increases in future loading to the WWTP as current and past users have appropriately worn out the WWTP over the years. However, to maintain equity, it will be imperative that new connections continue to pay their proportional share of the cost to buy into the system and make room (capacity) for their impact. A draft executive summary of the plan is included in this packet. The Executive Summary provides more detailed information on the findings, analysis and proposed 20-year improvement plan. Craig Anderson, PE Principal Engineer with MurraySmith will present the update on Page 39 of 161 the WWTP Facility plan supplemented by staff. Aside from the Facility Plan, MurraySmith is also assisting in the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan update so there is excellent linkage between the two efforts. Page 40 of 161 DRAFT 16-1916 Page ES-1 Facility Plan April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco Executive Summary Purpose This Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Facility Plan has been developed to be in conformance with Chapter 173-240 Washington Administrative Code (WAC) involving the Submission of Plans and Reports for Construction of Wastewater Facilities and Table G1-1 of the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) “Criteria for Sewage Works Design.” This Plan will enable the City of Pasco (City) to improve WWTP unit processes and operations, and continue to meet effluent quality requirements. This Plan includes the recommended modifications to the City’s WWTP for the next 20 years that are based on a detailed evaluation of feasible alternatives, with recommendations for improvements that are found to be cost-effective solutions to both the City’s near and long-term needs. Discharge Permit The Federal Clean Water Act requires municipal facilities that discharge treated wastewater into waters of the United States to obtain a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The permit establishes maximum pollutant concentrations and loads allowed in the effluent discharge stream. The Pasco WWTP operates under NPDES Permit WA-004496-2, which allows discharge of treated wastewater to the Columbia River. This permit was issued June 29, 2010 and was scheduled to end on June 30, 2015 but has been administratively extended while the Department of Ecology works on drafting the next permit. The projected wastewater flow growth in Pasco requires compliance with antidegradation standards. Based upon the results of a Tier II Antidegradation analysis and discussions with Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) Staff, the new discharge permit is expected to be issued in 2019/20 and remain largely unchanged. Therefore, all analysis in this document is based upon the 2010 permit requirements. It should be noted that statewide trending for discharge permits includes various levels of water quality and source control testing beyond what existing permit holders have experienced in the past. The City should review its pretreatment program and source control programs with an eye towards reducing the compliance effort to meet future discharge limits for toxics. While the permit conditions that will result from current rulemaking efforts are far from clear, the evidence points toward more stringent standards. Involvement with the rulemaking process will help the City achieve compliance flexibility and reasonable compliance schedules for any required pretreatment program, source control program, or WWTP facility changes that may become necessary in the future. Page 41 of 161 DRAFT 16-1916 Page ES-2 Facility Plan April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco WWTP Evaluation The City WWTP provides physical and biological treatment of the collected incoming wastewater prior to discharge of disinfected water to the Columbia River. The WWTP is located in the southeast region of the City. The facility was originally constructed in 1954 and was subsequently upgraded in the 1970s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010s. This 27.5 acre facility is the City’s municipal WWTP. An industrial wastewater treatment plant treats industrial wastewater in the north part of the City. An aerial image of the WWTP facility, with major unit processes, is shown in Figure ES-1. The City’s current population is 71,934 (2016) and results in approximately 5.4 million gallons of wastewater per day being treated at the WWTP. Population, flow and load projections were also developed for this Plan and are expected to approximately double by the 2040 planning horizon. The City has been one of the fastest growing cities in the State of Washington and nation over the last several years. The City has an excellent track record of meeting WWTP permit requirements. However, the capacity analysis of the WWTP identified portions of the WWTP that are currently at, or nearly at, capacity. With the additional flow projected to come to the WWTP, the majority of the WWTP will reach capacity limits during the planning horizon. These include aeration basins, the aeration system, secondary clarifiers, river outfall, dissolved air floatation thickening, anaerobic digestion, rotary drum thickener, drying beds and influent screens. Alternatives Evaluation and Selected Improvements Multiple alternatives to address the noted deficiencies were developed during workshops and site visits with City Staff. Alternatives considered for the liquid and biosolids streams at the WWTP are presented in Tables ES-1 and ES-2, respectively. Page 42 of 161 DRAFT 16-1916 Page ES-3 Facility Plan April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco Figure ES-1 WWTP Site Page 43 of 161 DRAFT 16-1916 Page ES-4 Facility Plan April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco Table ES-1 Liquid Treatment Alternatives Alternative Number Alternative Name Alternative Description Deficiency Addressed PRE-1 Screening No Action Continued use of existing screens None PRE-2 Expand Screening Expand headworks and with fourth perforated plate screen Screen SEC-1 Secondary Treatment No Action Continued use of existing aeration basins None SEC-2 Activated Sludge - Plug Flow Activated sludge with aeration basins with greater than 4:1 aspect ratio and/or multiple baffled stages Secondary Treatment - Aeration Basin, Aeration System SEC-3 Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Aeration basin with internal semipermeable membranes that are used to separate mixed liquor from treated effluent Aeration Basin Secondary Clarifier SEC-4 Internal Fixed Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) – Fixed Growth Conventional activated sludge type basin with addition of suspended plastic media with biological growth to generate a higher total microbiological mass. Secondary Treatment - Aeration Basin, Aeration System SEC-5 Zee lung membrane aeration bioreactor – Fixed Growth Conventional activated sludge type basin with submerged gas permeable membranes that support fixed film growth Secondary Treatment - Aeration Basin, Aeration System SEC-6 Trickling Filter/Activated Sludge Plant flow treated over fixed film based trickling filter followed by conventional activated sludge Secondary Treatment - Aeration Basin, Aeration System SEC-7 BioMag Activated Sludge Ballasted activated sludge Secondary Treatment - Aeration Basin, Aeration System SC-1 Secondary Clarifier No Action Continued use of existing secondary clarifiers None SC-2 Secondary Clarifier 3 and 4 Expand secondary sedimentation with Secondary Clarifier 3 and 4- Gravity separation in quiescent tank Secondary Clarifier DIS-1 UV Disinfection No Action Continued use of existing UV system None DIS-2 UV Disinfection Expansion Expand UV system Disinfection OUT-1 Outfall No Action Continued use of existing gravity outfall None OUT-2 Gravity Outfall Effluent discharge through gravity pipeline and diffuser Outfall Page 44 of 161 DRAFT 16-1916 Page ES-5 Facility Plan April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco Table ES-2 Biosolids Handling Alternatives Alternative Number Alternative Name Alternative Description Deficiency Addressed WAS-1 WAS Thickening No Action Continued use of single Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener (DAFT) None WAS-2 Mechanical Thickening Thickening of waste activated sludge through mechanical process prior to stabilization. DAFT STA-1 Anaerobic Digestion No Action Continued use of two anaerobic digesters None STA-2 Anaerobic Digestion Expansion Anaerobic digestion system to stabilize biosolids. Anaerobic Digester STA-3 Chemical Hydrolysis Breakdown of sludge into smaller chemical compounds prior to stabilization process. Anaerobic Digester STA-4 WAS Only Thermal Drying Drying WAS biosolids through application of heat to dry through evaporation of water. Other treatment of primary sludge biosolids will still be required. Anaerobic Digester FIN-1 Biosolids Finishing No Action Continued use of single RDT and drying beds None FIN-2 Mechanical Dewatering Mechanically dewater stabilized sludge to remove water and produce a "cake". Rotary Drum Thickener Drying Beds General Note: RDT= rotary drum thickener Capital Improvement Program The alternatives presented above were reviewed by the City and project team to determine which provided the required treatment capacity, were most cost effective, maintain reliable operation, and satisfy known permit conditions. The preferred improvements were developed into the WWTP Capital Improvement Program and the projects were prioritized and spread out over the next 20 years. Table ES-3 lists the proposed project timeframe for implementing each identified improvement, and Figure ES-2 graphically illustrates the proposed project timeframe. Page 45 of 161 DRAFT 16-1916 Page ES-6 Facility Plan April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco Table ES-3 List of Recommended Improvement Projects Project Number Project Name 2019-2022 2023-2026 2027-2033 2034-2040 1 Project 1 $24,073,000 - - - 1A 1A Outfall Study $175,000 - - - 1B 1B Secondary Treatment Project 1 $9,264,000 - - - 1C 1C Outfall Project 1 $1,637,000 - - - 1D 1D Mechanical Dewatering $8,653,000 - - - 1E 1E Mechanical Thickening $4,344,000 - - - 2 Project 2 - $17,664,000 - - 2A 2A Secondary Treatment Project 2 - $9,950,000 - - 2B 2B Outfall Project 2 - $4,898,000 - - 2C 2C UV Expansion Project - $2,816,000 - - 3 WWTP Facility Plan - - $400,000 - 4 Secondary Treatment Project 3 - - $5,162,000 - 5 Secondary Treatment Project 4 - - $10,953,000 - 6 Anaerobic Digestion Expansion - - $8,138,000 - 7 Administration Building - - - $5,076,000 8 Laboratory Building - - - $1,539,000 9 Headworks Expansion - - - $3,269,000 TOTAL $24,073,000 $17,664,000 $24,653,000 $9,884,000 Page 46 of 161 DRAFT 16-1916 Page ES-7 Facility Plan April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco Figure ES-2 Recommended Projects Phasing Effect of Capital Improvement Plan Implementation By implementing the recommended WWTP improvements in a timely manner, and as included in this Facility Plan, the City can ensure: ▪ The ability to handle wastewater generated within the collection system service area ▪ Compliance with discharge permit requirements for multiple constituents ▪ Protection of water quality in the Columbia River ▪ The ability to handle the projected biosolids generated at the WWTP Ultimately, by following the recommendations in this Plan, the City will serve its sewer customers, the general public and the environment for years to come while avoiding regulatory enforcement actions and fines. $0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 20192020202120222023202420252026202720282029203020312032203320342035203620372038203920401A - Outfall Study 1B - Secondary Treatment Project 1 1C - Outfall Project 1 1D - Mechanical Dewatering 1E - Mechanical WAS Thickening 2A - Secondary Treatment Project 2 2B - Outfall Project 2 2C - UV Expansion Project 3 - WWTP Facility Plan 4 - Secondary Treatment Project 3 5 - Secondary Treatment Project 4 Note: Engineering design designated with hatched pattern (e.g. ) Page 47 of 161 Pasco City Council MeetingJune 10, 2019Page 48 of 161 City of Pasco2019 WWTP Facility PlanCity Council SummaryPresented by: Craig AndersonJune 10, 2019Page 49 of 161 1. Existing WWTP ‐Layout‐Function2. Planning Period Impacts‐Age‐Growth/Capacity3. Recommended Solutions‐Selection Process‐Final CIPPRESENTATION OVERVIEWPage 50 of 161 1. Existing WWTP ‐Layout‐Function2. Planning Period Impacts‐Age‐Growth/Capacity3. Recommended Solutions‐Selection Process‐Final CIPPRESENTATION OVERVIEWPage 51 of 161 Pasco’s WWTPPage 52 of 161 Pasco’s WWTPPage 53 of 161 Primary TreatmentPage 54 of 161 Secondary TreatmentPage 55 of 161 DisinfectionPage 56 of 161 Liquid Disposal/ReusePage 57 of 161 Solids TreatmentPage 58 of 161 Solids Disposal/ReusePage 59 of 161 1. Existing WWTP ‐Layout‐Function2. Planning Period Impacts‐Age‐Growth/Capacity3. Recommended Solutions‐Selection Process‐Final CIPPRESENTATION OVERVIEWPage 60 of 161 WWTP Age and HistoryPage 61 of 161 WWTP Flow GrowthCurrent‐5.9 MGD average annual‐6.5 MGD maximum monthYear 2040‐9.8 MGD average annual‐10.8 MGD maximum monthPage 62 of 161 Planning Horizon DeficienciesPage 63 of 161 1. Existing WWTP ‐Layout‐Function2. Planning Period Impacts‐Age‐Growth/Capacity3. Recommended Solutions‐Selection Process‐Final CIPPRESENTATION OVERVIEWPage 64 of 161 Planning Horizon DeficienciesPage 65 of 161 Selected WWTP PathPage 66 of 161 Overall Project CostProject NumberProject NameProject Cost1Project 1$24,073,000 1A Outfall Study1B Secondary Treatment Project 11C Outfall Project 11D Mechanical Dewatering1E Mechanical Thickening2Project 2$17,664,000  2A Secondary Treatment Project 22B Outfall Project 22C UV Expansion Project3 WWTP Facility Plan$400,000  4 Secondary Treatment Project 3$5,162,000  5 Secondary Treatment Project 4$10,953,000  6 Anaerobic Digestion Expansion$8,138,000  7 Administration Building$5,076,000  8 Laboratory Building$1,539,000  9 Headworks Expansion$3,269,000  TOTAL$76,274,000  Page 67 of 161 Project Cost Timeline (CIP)Page 68 of 161 Additional Future WorkDraft Facility PlanPublic Notice & PresentationSEPA, SERPFinal Facility PlanQuestionsPage 69 of 161 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 14, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19 FROM: Steve Worley, Director Public Works SUBJECT: 2020-2025 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan I. REFERENCE(S): 2020-2025 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Project Map II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Sixtheir update to annually Washington are counties and cities required -Year Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP). Update of the TIP is necessary to qualify for federal and state funding. In addition, the updated includes small and large projects varying from street overlays, street widening, intersection improvements, to ADA improvements to pedestrian facilities to mega projects like the Lewis Street Overpass. These projects are included in the project list and are depicted on the project map. The TIP is a transportation system planning document and is not fiscally constrained, meaning, many of the projects on the list lack a secure source of funding. As a planning document, the proposed TIP update represents those projects that are anticipated to be needed within six years. Projects are often strategically coordinated with large utility projects, or may be delayed due to a lack of funding, and in some cases impacted positively or negatively by other agencies having an interest in a project; such as WSDOT, as a result timing of projects within the TIP will often and necessarily require adjustment. Page 70 of 161 Update of the TIP and subsequent submission to the State are statutory requirements, and while our local program is not required to be fiscally constrained, the program should be reasonable and realistic. The Council will see most of these projects again, incorporated with the annual Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the annual budgeting process, both of which are much more fiscally constrained than the TIP. V. DISCUSSION: The Plan is being presented to Council for questions and discussion. Upon Council review and direction, the plan will be modified and staff will prepare a resolution adopting the plan and present the TIP to the public in the form of a public hearing on June 17, 2019. The program will be submitted to the State after the public hearing. Page 71 of 161 June 10, 2019 Page 72 of 161 Page 73 of 161 Page 74 of 161 Page 75 of 161 Page 76 of 161 Page 77 of 161 Questions?Page 78 of 161 Proj. #Project Name # on Map Road Name Begin & End Termini PE ROW Construction Total Project Cost Ongoing Project Funding Secured?2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 n/a -Annual Pavement Preservation Program 1 various various $ 252,000 $ - $ 5,246,148 $ 5,498,148 YES YES $ 850,000 $ 875,500 $ 901,765 $ 928,818 $ 956,682 $ 985,383 13007 -Lewis Street Overpass 2 Lewis Street Oregon Avenue to 2nd Avenue $ 3,565,000 $ 4,080,000 $ 24,371,000 $ 32,016,000 YES PARTIAL $ 18,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 2,371,000 n/a -Lewis Street Corridor Improvements 3 Lewis Street 5th Avenue to 2nd Avenue $ 125,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,625,000 YES PARTIAL $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 500,000 16014 -Citywide Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades - Phase 2 4 Multiple Locations Multiple Locations $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,300,000 YES YES $ 3,000,000 13005 -Road 68 and Burden Road Intersection/channelization Improvements 5 Road 68 Chapel Hill Blvd to Sandifur Parkway $ 55,000 $ - $ 205,000 $ 260,000 NEW YES $ 260,000 15009 -Wrigley Drive Extension 6 Wrigley Drive Clemente Lane to Convention Drive $ 18,000 $ 16,000 $ 276,000 $ 310,000 YES YES $ 276,000 n/a -Road 68 Widening - South of Interstate 182 - Phase 1 7 Road 68 Interstate 182 to Argent Road $ 57,628 $ 250,000 $ 307,628 NO YES $ 250,000 12001 -Argent Road Improvements - Phase 1 8 Argent Road Varney/Saraceno to 20th Avenue $ 415,000 $ - $ 1,600,000 $ 2,015,000 YES YES $ 1,600,000 12001 -Argent Road Improvements - Phase 2 9 Argent Road Road 36 to Varney/Saraceno $ 715,000 $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,715,000 NO PARTIAL $ 300,000 n/a -Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 1 10 Burns Road Rd 100 to Rd 90 $ 12,000 $ - $ 108,000 $ 120,000 NEW NO $ 12,000 $ 108,000 n/a -Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 2 11 Burns Road Rd 90 to Rd 84 $ 8,000 $ - $ 63,000 $ 71,000 NEW NO $ 8,000 $ 63,000 n/a -Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 3 12 Burns Road Rd 84 to Rd 68 $ 11,000 $ - $ 91,000 $ 102,000 NEW NO $ 11,000 $ 91,000 n/a -Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 100 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership 13 Road 100 St. Thomas Drive to Harris Rd $ 120,000 $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 2,320,000 NEW NO $ 120,000 $ 2,200,000 n/a -Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 68 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership 14 Road 68 Chapel Hill Blvd to Burden Blvd $ 100,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,100,000 NEW NO $ 100,000 $ 1,000,000 n/a -Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street Overpass - WSDOT Partnership 15 Sylvester Street 32nd Avenue to 28th Avenue $ 78,000 $ - $ - $ 78,000 NEW NO $ 78,000 n/a -Road 100 Widening - South of Interstate 182 16 Road 100 Court Street to Chapel Hill $ 375,000 $ - $ 3,750,000 $ 4,125,000 NO NO $ 375,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,250,000 n/a -Sacajawea Heritage Trail/Levee Lowering 17 Sacajawea Heritage Trail Road 72 to Road 52 $ 231,000 $ - $ 4,500,000 $ 4,731,000 NO NO $ 196,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,000,000 17001 -Sandifur Parkway Widening 18 Sandifur Parkway Road 60 to Road 52 $ 25,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ 425,000 NO NO $ 25,000 $ 400,000 n/a -Court Street & Road 68 Intersection Improvements 19 Court Street Road 68 $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 735,000 $ 860,000 NEW NO $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 735,000 n/a -Road 44 and Argent Road Intersection Analysis 20 Road 44 and Argent Road Road 44 and Argent Road $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ 65,000 NO NO $ 65,000 n/a -Traffic Analysis for Interstate 182 @ SR 395 Interchange 21 Interstate 182 MP 11 to MP 13 $ 265,000 $ - $ - $ 265,000 NO NO $ 265,000 n/a -Traffic Analysis for State Route 12 @ Tank Farm Road Interchange 22 State Route 12 State Route 12 and Tank Farm Road $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 NO NO $ 250,000 n/a -FCID Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway Study 23 None Road 100 to Road 76 FCID Canal Alignment $ 90,000 $ - $ 780,000 $ 870,000 YES NO $ 90,000 $ 360,000 $ 420,000 n/a -Crescent Road Surface Improvement 24 Crescent Road Broadmoor Apts to Road 108 (1670 LF) $ 45,000 $ - $ 355,000 $ 400,000 NO NO $ 45,000 $ 355,000 n/a -Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 1 25 Sandifur Parkway Road 100 west to Road to be named later $ 150,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,650,000 NEW NO $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000 n/a -Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 2 26 Sandifur Parkway Road to be named later to Dent Road Extension $ 150,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,650,000 NEW NO $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000 16010 -James Street Improvements 27 James Street Oregon Avenue to cul- de-sac $ 48,000 $ - $ 435,000 $ 483,000 NO NO $ 48,000 $ 435,000 n/a -Road 76 Overpass 28 Road 76 Chapel Hill Blvd to Burden Blvd $ 1,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 28,000,000 $ 30,000,000 NO NO $ 300,000 16017 -Transportation System Master Plan N/A Citywide various $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 YES YES $ 200,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 25,207,000$ 8,524,500$ 6,700,765$ 4,584,818$ 6,477,682$ 5,690,383$ 2020 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Page 79 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Annual Pavement Preservation Program Citywide - Various 2020 Ongoing The City has a pavement preservation program to assess the condition of roads and to determine if those roads would benefit from preservation measures to repair and extend the life of the surface. Prioritization is based upon classification, condition, and determined impact of expended funds to extend serviceability. This amount also includes 50% of the monies slated for alley hard surfacing. $ 4,500,000 OVERLAY (S)$ 4,500,000 TOTAL $ 4,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 750,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 0 $ 4,500,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Map # 1 Page 80 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV 13007 2020 to 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Lewis Street Overpass Oregon Avenue to 2nd Avenue 2020 Ongoing One of the largest, regionally significant projects, for Pasco in the last 20 years. This project will replace the restrictive, deteriorating, and inefficient underpass, built in 1937, with a new overpass between 2nd Avenue and Oregon Avenue. This new overpass will be the gateway to downtown Pasco and will begin the design theme with Streetscape and decorative elements that will ultimately bring new life to the Peanuts Park area which houses the well-known Pasco Farmers Market, now retitled el Mercado de Pasco. Improvements include concrete overpass, new roadway surface with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including potable water, irrigation water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater will also be built. $ 32,016,000 $ 7,082,005 City 120-Arterial (S)$ 2,756,281 CWA (S)$ 15,000,000 City 193-REET (S)$ 1,565,982 Fed Grant (S)$ 3,754,231 City 125 - I-82 (S)$ 12,252 Stormwater Part (S)$ 300,000 $ 3,565,000 $ 0 $ 3,565,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,080,000 $ 0 $ 4,080,000 $ 31,000 $ 24,340,000 $ 24,371,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 7,676,000 $ 18,000,000 $ 24,340,000 $ 0 $ 32,016,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 2,340,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 2,340,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,000,000 Map # 2 Page 81 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Lewis Street Corridor Improvement 5th Avenue to 2nd Avenue 2020 Ongoing The project is intended to tie the improvements made with the overpass project into those made under the Peanuts Park improvement project. Taking into account the anticipated increase in pedestrian/bicycle traffic as well as the positive impact to businesses within this corridor, this project is intended to enhance the accessibility to businesses and improve the safety and efficiency of the transportation corridor. $ 1,625,000 CDBG (S)$ 875,000 REET (U)$ 750,000 TOTAL $ 1,625,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 125,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,000 $ 550,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 0 $ 1,625,000 $ 50,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 550,000 $ 500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 500,000 Map # 3 Page 82 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV 16014 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Citywide Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades - Phase 2 Multiple Location 2019 Ongoing The City’s signal controllers are out of date. This project continues where phase 1 left off to update the signal controllers, as well as the interconnect equipment. The project will also improve the vehicle detection system, and emergency vehicle priority. Pedestrian access will also be upgraded to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines. $ 3,300,000 FUND 120 (S)$ 435,000 STBG (S)$ 2,642,361 TAP (S)$ 146,891 FUND 125 (S)$ 158,000 TOTAL $ 3,300,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 0 $ 3,300,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 3,000,000 Map # 4 Page 83 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Road 68 and Burden Blvd Intersection/Channelization Improvements Road 68 & Burden Blvd 2020 New Often identified as Pasco’s most congested corridor this project, in conjunction with the Wrigley Drive Extension Project, is intended to reduce traffic congestion, increase efficiency, and improve safety. WSDOT is an important partner in identifying and prioritizing these projects as the first to address immediate concerns and make the largest impact with the available funds. This project will include signing, striping, and channelization considerations on Burden Boulevard and Road 68 to reduce stacking of vehicles in the westbound lanes at the intersection. $ 260,000 City 120 - Arterial (S)$ 35,100 STBG (S)$ 224,900 TOTAL $ 260,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 205,000 $ 205,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 260,000 $ 260,000 $ 0 $ 260,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 205,000 Map # 5 Page 84 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV 15009 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Wrigley Drive Extension Clemente Lane to Convention Drive 2019 Ongoing This project, identified by WSDOT as an important co-effort with the Road 68 and Burden Road Intersection/Channelization Improvements Project, in addressing congestion, efficiency, and safety concerns associated with the Road 68 Corridor. This connection will provide another alternative to residents for accessing Road 68 at a signalized intersection. Although no frontage improvements are being considered as part of this effort, this project will provide a core-road that when adjacent properties develop those additional improvements will be added. This improvement will provide an important connection to road 68 for area residents and will relieve some of the demand placed upon the intersection of Road 68 and Burden Boulevard. Improvements include new roadway surface without curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including potable water, irrigation water, and sanitary sewer are also being extended. $ 310,000 City 450-Sewer (S)$ 13,950 City 411-Water (S)$ 13,950 City 420-Irr (S)$ 13,950 STP(UL) (S)$ 268,150 TOTAL $ 310,000 $ 18,000 $ 0 $ 18,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 16,000 $ 0 $ 16,000 $ 276,000 $ 276,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 34,000 $ 276,000 $ 276,000 $ 0 $ 310,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 276,000 Map # 6 Page 85 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Road 68 Widening - South of I-182 - Phase 1 Rd 68 - I-182 2020 Pre-Existing This project is intended to add width to the westerly side of Road 68 to better handle the increased Average Daily Traffic (ADT) numbers due to continued development of the area. Although some of this will be developer driven there will still be remaining pieces that will need city involvement for consistency. Improvements include street widening with a new roadway surface along with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including stormwater may also be built as part of the improvements. $ 307,628 FUND 110 (S) $ 41,530 STBG (S)$ 266,098 TOTAL $ 307,628 $ 57,628 $ 0 $ 57,628 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 57,628 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 307,628$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 250,000 Map # 7 Page 86 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV 12001 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Argent Road Improvement, Phase 1 Argent Rd - Varney/Saraceno to 20th Ave 2020 Ongoing This project was originally considered in its entirety from Road 36 to 20th Avenue. It also includes two important stakeholders in Columbia Basin Community College (CBC) and The Port of Pasco (Port). Do to the immediate improvements necessary as part of the development of the Port of Pasco’s property, namely the new hotel, it became necessary to break the project into two phases. This project now includes two phases. Phase 1 includes improvements from Varney Lane/Saraceno Way to 20th Avenue while Phase 2 extends from road 36 to Varney Lane/Saraceno Way. Improvements include street widening with a new roadway surface along with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including stormwater will also be built as part of the improvements. $ 1,600,000 $ 415,000 PORT OF PASCO (S)$ 800,000 CBC (S)$ 800,000 TOTAL $ 1,600,000 $ 415,000 $ 0 $ 415,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 415,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 0 $ 2,015,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 $ 1,600,000 Map # 8 Page 87 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV 12001 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Argent Road Improvement, Phase 2 Argent Rd - Rd 36 to Varney/Saraceno 2025 Pre-Existing This project was originally considered in its entirety from Road 36 to 20th Avenue. It also includes two important stakeholders in Columbia Basin Community College (CBC) and The Port of Pasco (Port). Do to the immediate improvements necessary as part of the development of the Port of Pasco’s property, namely the new hotel, it became necessary to break the project into two phases. This project now includes two phases. Phase 1 includes improvements from Varney Lane/Saraceno Way to 20th Avenue while Phase 2 extends from road 36 to Varney Lane/Saraceno Way. Improvements include street widening with a new roadway surface along with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including stormwater will also be built as part of the improvements. $ 3,300,000 $ 415,000 PORT (S)$ 100,000 CBC (S)$ 100,000 City (U)$ 100,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 415,000 $ 300,000 $ 715,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 415,000 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,715,000 $ 300,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 300,000 Map # 9 Page 88 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathways - Phase 1 Burns Rd - Rd 100 to Rd 90 2021 New With the development of properties to the north of Burns Road and the associated improvement of the road itself what is missing is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway on the south side of Burns Road to provide a safe connection to other residential communities but also for children to effectively get to and from the new schools under design just north of Burns Road. This 12’ wide asphalt pathway is similar to many other pedestrian/bicycle pathways in the city and will provide a safe and convenient way for citizens to move within the area. $ 120,000 REET (U)$ 30,000 SRTS (U)$ 90,000 TOTAL $ 120,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 108,000 $ 108,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 120,000 $ 0 $ 120,000 $ 12,000 $ 108,000 $ 12,000 $ 108,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 10 Page 89 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathways - Phase 2 Burns Rd - Rd 90 to Rd 84 2021 New With the development of properties to the north of Burns Road and the associated improvement of the road itself what is missing is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway on the south side of Burns Road to provide a safe connection to other residential communities but also for children to effectively get to and from the new schools under design just north of Burns Road. This 12’ wide asphalt pathway is similar to many other pedestrian/bicycle pathways in the city and will provide a safe and convenient way for citizens to move within the area $ 71,000 REET (U)$ 16,000 SRTS (U)$ 55,000 TOTAL $ 71,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 63,000 $ 63,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 71,000 $ 0 $ 71,000 $ 8,000 $ 63,000 $ 8,000 $ 0 $ 63,000 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 11 Page 90 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathways - Phase 3 Burns Rd - Rd 84 to Rd 68 2021 New With the development of properties to the north of Burns Road and the associated improvement of the road itself what is missing is a pedestrian/bicycle pathway on the south side of Burns Road to provide a safe connection to other residential communities but also for children to effectively get to and from the new schools under design just north of Burns Road. This 12’ wide asphalt pathway is similar to many other pedestrian/bicycle pathways in the city and will provide a safe and convenient way for citizens to move within the area. $ 102,000 REET (U)$ 25,500 SRTS (U)$ 76,500 TOTAL $ 102,000 $ 11,000 $ 11,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 91,000 $ 91,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 102,000 $ 0 $ 102,000 $ 11,000 $ 91,000 $ 11,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 91,000 $ 0 Map # 12 Page 91 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 100 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership Rd 100 - St Thomas Dr to Harris Rd 2022 New Along with the Complete Streets Ordinance that the City of Pasco applies to all transportation corridors presented for improvements within the City the interchanges result in barriers to pedestrians and bicyclists wishing to traverse them. In an effort to provide better access to pedestrians and bicyclists the City will work with WSDOT to either improve existing facilities, such as those already in place on Road 68 or add improvements such as those identified for Road 100 Interchange. Since pedestrian/bicycle facilities don’t currently exist at this location the City will work with WSDOT to add those. Initial discussions indicate that the interchange bridge deck provides enough width to accommodate pedestrian/bicycle facilities. With that, the City is proposing that the overpass be re-striped in a “first phase” with the ultimate project having enhanced facilities providing safe and encouraging access. $ 2,320,000 WSDOT (U)$ 470,000 TIF (U)$ 50,000 STBG (U)$ 1,500,000 ARTERIAL (U)$ 300,000 TOTAL $ 2,320,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,320,000 $ 0 $ 2,320,000 $ 120,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 0 $ 120,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 13 Page 92 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 68 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership Rd 68 - Chapel Hill Blvd to Burden Blvd 2023 New Along with the Complete Streets Ordinance that the City of Pasco applies to all transportation corridors presented for improvements within the City the interchanges result in barriers to pedestrians and bicyclists wishing to traverse them. In an effort to provide better access to pedestrians and bicyclists the City will work with WSDOT to either improve existing facilities, such as those already in place on Road 68 or add improvements such as those identified for Road 100 Interchange. Since pedestrian/bicycle facilities currently exist at this location the City will work with WSDOT to improve and enhance the access that those facilities are intended to provide. $ 1,100,000 WSDOT (U)$ 275,000 TIF (U)$ 25,000 STBG (U)$ 800,000 TOTAL $ 1,100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,100,000 $ 0 $ 1,100,000 $ 100,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 0 Map # 14 Page 93 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester St Overpass - WSDOT Partnership Sylvester St - 32nd Ave to 28th Ave 2021 New Along with the Complete Streets Ordinance that the City of Pasco applies to all transportation corridors presented for improvements within the City the interchanges and overpasses result in barriers to pedestrians and bicyclists wishing to traverse them. In an effort to provide better access to pedestrians and bicyclists the City will work with WSDOT to either improve existing facilities access. Since pedestrian/bicycle facilities don’t currently exist at this location the City will work with WSDOT to add those. Integral to the exterior wall supporting the upper metal barrier exists a “stepped” or raised concrete section that interferes with the ability to provide a level platform for pedestrians and/or bicyclists. The City proposes to work with WSDOT to undertake an evaluation to determine whether or not that raised section can be eliminated or possibly extended to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists. $ 78,000 WSDOT (U) $ 25,000 ARTERIAL (U)$ 25,000 TAP (U)$ 28,000 TOTAL $ 78,000 $ 78,000 $ 78,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 78,000 $ 0 $ 78,000 $ 78,000 $ 78,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 15 Page 94 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Road 100 Widening (South of I-182) Court Street to Chapel Hill 2023 Pre-Existing This project is intended to improve both deficiencies in Right-of-way and road surface width in areas that used to be within the County. Road 100 is a major arterial providing citizens direct access to the interchange at Interstate 182. The extents of this project are Court Street on the South and Chapel Hill Boulevard on the north. Improvements include street widening with a new roadway surface along with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including stormwater will also be built as part of the improvements. $ 4,125,000 TIF (U)$ 500,000 City (U)$ 1,525,000 ARTERIAL (U)$ 2,000,000 TAP (U)$ 100,000 TOTAL $ 4,125,000 $ 375,000 $ 375,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,750,000 $ 3,750,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,125,000 $ 0 $ 4,125,000 $ 375,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,250,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 375,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,250,000 Map # 16 Page 95 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering Sacajawea Heritage Trail - Rd 72 to Rd 52 2020 Pre-Existing This project will lower the existing levee height to reflect the actual height necessary to provide protection to those properties bounded by its extents. The lowering will provide the opportunity to rebuild the pedestrian/bicycle pathway and provide additional width, outside that paved, for added safety to users than currently exists. This pathway will connect the Sacajawea Heritage Trail from Road 72 to Road 52. $ 4,696,000 $ 35,000 RCO (U)$ 3,650,000 REET (U)$ 1,081,000 TOTAL $ 4,731,000 $ 35,000 $ 196,000 $ 196,000 $ 231,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 35,000 $ 196,000 $ 4,696,000 $ 0 $ 4,731,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 17 Page 96 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV 2020 to 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Sandifur Parkway Widening Road 60 to Road 52 2020 Pre-Existing This project will add the necessary asphalt pavement width, approximately 15', to Sandifur Parkway from Road 52 to Road 60. This improvement will complete the "core road" section providing safe and consistent lanes widths. $ 425,000 CITY (U)$ 125,000 OVERLAY (U)$ 300,000 TOTAL $ 425,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 25,000 $ 425,000 $ 0 $ 425,000 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 18 Page 97 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Court St & Road 68 Intersection Improvements Court St & Road 68 2022 New This project will consist of the design and construction of intersection control measures. This intersection has proven to be unsafe and in need of improvement due to an increase in the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) demands associated with the development in the area that has added additional vehicles to this intersection. $ 860,000 TIF (U)$ 25,000 ARTERIAL (U)$ 100,000 TIB (U)$ 735,000 TOTAL $ 860,000 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 735,000 $ 735,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 860,000 $ 0 $ 860,000 $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 735,000 $ 0 $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 735,000 $ 0 Map # 19 Page 98 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Road 44 aand Argent Rd Intersection Improvements - Partnership with County Road 44 & Argent Rd 2024 Pre-Existing Connecting a heavily populated residential area of the City with an arterial street, Argent Road, this intersection continues to receive a large volume of traffic with concerns of the level of service falling below allowable limits. The City will undertake an evaluation, with Franklin County, to determine the best course of action, if any, to ensure that the intersection continues to perform at an acceptable level. $ 65,000 TIF (U)$ 10,000 CITY (U)$ 15,000 HSIP (U)$ 40,000 TOTAL $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 65,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 0 Map # 20 Page 99 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Traffic Analysis for I-182 @ US 395 Interchange I-182 MP 11 - MP13 2022 Pre-Existing As a continuing effort associated with the Interstate 182 interchange feasibility study done recently by the City of Pasco this effort will further study the connectivity of this critical interchange to determine if improvements can be made to improve efficiency, provide better connectivity for motorists taking pressure off of other areas of the City transportation network. $ 265,000 TIF (U)$ 60,000 CITY (U)$ 165,000 HSIP (U)$ 40,000 TOTAL $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 265,000 $ 0 $ 265,000 $ 265,000 $ 0 $ 265,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 21 Page 100 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Traffic Analysis for SR 12 @ Tank Farm Road Interchange SR 12 & Tank Farm Road 2023 Pre-Existing Identified as a possible interchange improvement by WSDOT this location serves a large potential industrial area that the City of Pasco has already invested money. This analysis, in conjunction with WSDOT and Federal Highways, would provide the information to better prepare a strategic plan in addressing transportation connectivity with State Route 12 in this area. $ 250,000 TIF (U)$ 60,000 CITY (U)$ 160,000 HSIP (U)$ 30,000 TOTAL $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 22 Page 101 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford FCID Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway Study Rd 100 to Rd 76 (FCID Canal Alignment)2020 Ongoing This project, originally identified in the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan as FCID Trail – Phase 2, will be further evaluated with new information as to ownership of the property. As a part of that evaluation the City will endeavor to coordinate with multiple stakeholders to create a plane to secure and build a 12’ wide pedestrian/bicycle asphalt pathway further extending and connecting those pathways through and around the City of Pasco. $ 870,000 RCO (U)$ 585,000 REET (U)$ 285,000 TOTAL $ 870,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 780,000 $ 780,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 870,000 $ 0 $ 870,000 $ 90,000 $ 360,000 $ 420,000 $ 90,000 $ 360,000 $ 420,000 $ 0 $ 0 Map # 23 Page 102 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Crescent Road Surface Improvements Broadmoor Apts to Road 108 (1670 LF)2024 Pre-Existing This project is intended to design and construct an asphalt road from Road 108 to Chapel Hill Boulevard. The existing roadway does not make connection to Chapel Hill Boulevard in its present extents. Although no frontage improvements are being considered as part of this effort, this project will provide a core-road that when adjacent properties develop those additional improvements will be added. This improvement will provide an important connection to road 100 for area residents and will relieve some of the demand placed upon the southern end of Road 100. $ 400,000 CITY (U)$ 100,000 DEVELOPER (U)$ 300,000 TOTAL $ 400,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 355,000 $ 355,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 400,000 $ 0 $ 400,000 $ 45,000 $ 355,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,000 $ 355,000 Map # 24 Page 103 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 to 2025 PW/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 1 Road 100 west to Road to be named (2,800')2023 New This project extends Sandifur Parkway from Road 100 to the east approximately 2800’ to a future north-south road (Name TBD). This north-south roadway encompasses the trunk sewer main. This project would include new asphalt roadway surface, curb/gutter, and sidewalks consistent with Sandifur Parkway as it exists on the west side of Road 100. This project would also modify the current connection of Harris Road into Road 100, as well as its potential alignment change to address a future NW loop ramp for the interchange improvement as originally identified in the 2017 feasibility for Traffic Study for Interchanges. Although this alignment and connection change would be made development is anticipated to finish the necessary frontage improvements. $ 1,650,000 CITY (U)$ 150,000 DEVELOPER (U)$ 1,500,000 TOTAL $ 1,650,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,650,000 $ 0 $ 1,650,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 Map # 25 Page 104 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 to 2025 PW/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 2 Road to be named to Dent Road (2,800')2024 New This project continues the extension of Sandifur Parkway with a connection to the Pahlisch Homes development. This project would include new asphalt roadway surface, curb/gutter, and sidewalks consistent with Sandifur Parkway Phase 1. $ 1,650,000 CITY (U)$ 150,000 DEVELOPER (U)$ 1,500,000 TOTAL $ 1,650,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1,650,000 $ 0 $ 1,650,000 $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000 Map # 26 Page 105 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV 16010 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford James Street Improvements Oregon Avenue to Cul-De-Sac 2023 Pre-Existing This project is intended to provide a safe and consistent roadway to many of Pasco’s heavy machinery and agricultural/industrial oriented businesses. James street has evolved over time as different business located along its sides into what is now a hodgepodge of intermingled access points, utility risers, and poorly lit travel ways. This area deserves to be a focal point representing the pride that Pasco has for services offered by these businesses for the economic vitality of the region. This project will redefine the heavily used roadway by providing a new heavy duty roadway section, curb/gutter and pedestrian considerations along with r/w improvements that will not only beautify but enhance accessibility and safety for the traveling public and the businesses within this corridor, now and in the future. $ 483,000 LID $ 483,000 TOTAL $ 483,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 435,000 $ 435,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 483,000 $ 0 $ 483,000 $ 48,000 $ 435,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 48,000 $ 435,000 $ 0 Map # 27 Page 106 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV N/A 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Road 76 Overpass Chapel Hill to Burden Blvd 2025 Pre-Existing An overpass was suggested as part of the DNR property improvements. That area is defined as south of Interstate 182, east of Road 84 and west of Road 68. This overpass would help to take the pressure off of the interchange at Road 68 by providing another access route to the popular businesses along Road 68. The initial money allocated are to analyze the effectiveness of the overpass and provide a feasibility plan for its construction. $ 30,000,000 CITY (U)$ 300,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 $ 0 $ 28,000,000 $ 28,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 29,700,000 $ 30,000,000 $ 300,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 300,000 Map # 28 Page 107 of 161 PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LOCATION 7RWDOBudget ([SHQGLWXUHV CAPITAL COSTS Prior Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2020-2025 TOTAL Future Year(s)Total <HDU Planning/Design/ Engineering In-House Professional Svcs. Land Acquisition Construction Comp. Hardware/ Software Equipment Other Services Total $17,&,3$7('METHOD OF FINANCING ($) (S)= Secured (U)= Unsecured DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION PROJECT STATUS Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) City of Pasco Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Project # Department/Division Department Contact PROJECT START 352-(&767$786 ($) %XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV 16017 2020 TO 2025 Public Works/Engineering Daniel S. Ford Transportation System Master Plan Citywide 2019 Ongoing A critical tool that the City of Pasco can utilize as it continues to address its unprecedented growth and provide an acceptable level of service to the Citizens of Pasco. The plan will outline policies and projects, analyze current and projects transportation conditions, create a plan of what transportation system might look like for the next 20 years, reflects community values and council goals, supports proposed land development patterns, attempts to balance the needs of the motorized public including freight and multimodal transportation considerations as well as provides a financial plan in effectively addressing the transportation needs of the City. $ 300,000 FUND 110 (S)$ 300,000 TOTAL $ 300,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 0 $ 300,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0 Map # n/a Page 108 of 161 ROAD 44BURDEN BLVD. I-18 2 ARGENT COURT STREET SYLVESTER STREET WRIGLEY ROAD 68CITY LIMITS SANDIFUR CITY LIMITS A STREET LEWIS ST AIN S W O R T H SR- 3 9 7OREGON AVE.SR-397BNSF RR4TH AVE.20TH AVE.ARGENT BNSF RRHILLSBORO COMMERCIALST. HELENS KAH L O T U S HI G H W A Y S R - 1 2 C I T Y L IM I T SSR-395CAPITALCITY LIMITS FOSTER WELLS RD ROAD 100YEAR 2020-2025 SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CITY OF PASCO Projects N/A Annual Pavement Preservation Program 2 Lewis Street Overpass 3 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements 4 Citywide Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades - Phase 2 5 Road 68 and Burden Road Intersection/channelization Improvements 6 Wrigley Drive Extension 7 Road 68 Widening - South of Interstate 182 - Phase 1 8 Argent Road Improvements - Phase 1 9 Argent Road Improvements - Phase 2 10 Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 1 11 Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 2 12 Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 3 13 Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 100 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership 14 Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 68 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership 15 Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street Overpass - WSDOT Partnership 16 Road 100 Widening - South of Interstate 182 17 Sacajawea Heritage Trail/Levee Lowering 18 Sandifur Parkway Widening Projects 19 Court Street & Road 68 Intersection Improvements 20 Road 44 and Argent Road Intersection Analysis 21 Traffic Analysis for Interstate 182 @ SR 395 Interchange 22 Traffic Analysis for State Route 12 @ Tank Farm Road Interchange 23 FCID Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway Study 24 Crescent Road Surface Improvement 25 Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 1 26 Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 2 27 James Street Improvements 28 Road 76 Overpass N/A Transportation System Master PlanPage 109 of 161 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 3, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19 FROM: Steve Worley, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Foster Wells Force Main Update & Agreement I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 13.55 Reimbursement Agreement Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated project cost - $4.26 million Funded with revenue bonds Paid by Processors IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City of Pasco has owned and operated the Pasco Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF) since 1995. The PWRF and associated farm properties are located in an area of irrigated agriculture production fields on approximately 1,800 acres north of Pasco off Foster Wells Road, east of Highway 395 in Franklin County. The PWRF currently receives process wastewater from five food processors; Pasco Processing, Twin City Foods, Reser’s, Simplot RDO, and Freeze Pack. Flows from the first three processors listed are pumped from the Foster Wells Lift Station located at the northeast corner of E Foster Wells Road and Industrial Way through two force mains (16” and 8” diameters) to the PWRF. V. DISCUSSION: Page 110 of 161 Due to the age of the existing Foster Wells force mains, breaks within the piping system occur frequently. In 2018 there was a valve failure that caused a three-day shut down of the pump station, which in turn shut down Pasco Processing, Twin City Foods and Reser’s. The economic impact to each Processor of a shut down due to repairs to the Foster Wells force main are significant enough that the Processors asked what could be done to minimize the shutdowns. The idea of a redundant force main from the Foster Wells Lift Station to the PWRF was proposed. This additional force main would provide reliability through redundancy to the system which would allow the flows from the lift station to the PWRF to be switched between the existing force mains to the new force mains such that repairs to either system could be made without shutdowns being required of the Processors. The Processors have supported this idea and asked the City to move forward as quickly as possible with the design and construction of this new force main. PACE Engineers was selected to design the force main and the project is now out for bid. The Processors have been notified that a reimbursement agreement for the cost of this project will be required prior to the award of the bid. Staff will provide a quick presentation of this information. Page 111 of 161 EXISTING FOSTERWELLS LIFT STATIONNEW COLUMBIA EASTFORCE MAINS UNDERSEPARATE CONTRACTEXISTING FOSTER WELLSFORCE MAINS(SCHEDULE A)NEW FOSTER WELLSFORCE MAINFOSTER WELLS ROADFOSTER WELLS ROAD US 395 US 395 CAPITAL AVENUE PWRF(SCHEDULE B)COLUMBIA EASTFORCE MAINPage 112 of 161 Foster Wells Force Main Reimbursement Agreement - 1 of 5 FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF: City of Pasco, Washington WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Pasco, Washington 525 North 3rd Pasco WA 99301 _____________________________________________________________________________ FOSTER WELLS FORCE MAIN REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT between the City of Pasco, a Washington Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City”; and Reser’s Fine Foods, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Reser’s’; Tri-Cities Foods, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Twin City Foods, Inc.”; and Pasco Processing, LLC, hereinafter referred to as “Pasco Processing”, and collectively referred to as “Processors” enter into this Agreement for the purpose of providing an additional force main processed wastewater transmission from the Processors’ business sites to the City’s Reuse Facility according to the following terms and conditions. WHEREAS, the City operates and maintains a Reuse Facility for the disposal of wastewater from the Processors’ plants; and WHEREAS, the existing 8” and 16” force mains, which were built as part of the original Reuse Facility and the original Foster Wells Lift Station, are aging and often experience leaks that need to be repaired; and WHEREAS, when repairs to the existing 8” and/or 16” force mains are needed, shutdown of the Processors flows to the Foster Wells Lift Station is sometimes needed, thus causing economic impacts to the Processors; and WHEREAS, the Processors have requested that the City construct a redundant 16” force main from the Foster Wells Lift Station to the Reuse Facility such that if repairs to any of the force mains are needed in the future, flows from the Processors can continue to the Reuse Facility using the redundant force main, and WHEREAS, the City has agreed, at its initial cost, to design and construct such redundant 16” force main line; and WHEREAS, as a result of the Processors’ request and direct benefit for the City’s design and construction of this pipeline, the Processors have agreed to reimburse the City for the actual costs of the design and construction of the pipeline. Page 113 of 161 Foster Wells Force Main Reimbursement Agreement - 2 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL CONVENANTS CONTAINED HEREIN, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Design and Construction of the 16” Force Main Wastewater Pipeline. The City, at its sole expense, shall provide for the design and construction of a 16” (iron pipe size or equivalent HDPE size) force main wastewater distribution pipeline more particularly described in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The wastewater distribution pipeline as described above, upon acceptance, shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City with all rights and title thereto reserved to the City alone. 2. Cost of Project. The estimated cost of the project is $4,250,500. The City shall upon completion of the design and execution of this Agreement expeditiously place the project out for bid, and timely award the bid to a qualifying contactor in accordance with State law. Upon completion of the project and acceptance by the City, the final actual cost of the project shall be determined. The final actual cost of the project shall be the reimbursement amount required to be paid by the Processors as provided in Section 3 below. 3. Allocation of Reimbursement Costs. The final reimbursement costs shall be allocated among the Processors as a percentage based upon their existing permitted flows to the Reuse Facility. The estimated costs and percentage of reimbursement for each processor is identified below. These amounts shall be adjusted based on the final actual costs for the Project. A. Reser’s Fine Foods, Inc. Flow Amount 115 million gallons/year Percentage 16% B. Twin City Foods, Inc. Flow Amount: 220 million gallons/year Percentage: 31% C. Pasco Processing, LLC Flow Amount 383 million gallons/year Percentage 53% 4. Reimbursement Schedule. Each Processors’ portion of the reimbursement cost, together with interest, hall be paid to the City based on the debt service schedule of the financial instrument used to fund the project. It is currently anticipated the City will sell bonds to be repaid over a period of fifteen (15) years. Reimbursements shall be payable on the 1st day of each month in the following amounts. These amounts shall be adjusted based on the final actual costs for the Project. A. Reser’s Find Foods, Inc. $ 4,820 B. Twin City Foods, Inc. $ 9,220 C. Pasco Processing, LLC $16,051 Page 114 of 161 Foster Wells Force Main Reimbursement Agreement - 3 of 5 5. City’s Responsibility. The City shall assume sole responsibility and cost for the maintenance and operation, and repair of the facility identified in Section 1 above except for any damage or accelerated deterioration caused in whole or in part, by the negligent acts or omissions of a Processor, including discharge of material inconsistent with the standards established by the City for wastewater transmission, which damages, including the repair or replacement of the effective portions of the pipeline, shall be the responsibility of the Processor or contributing processors causing the damage who shall be solely liable for the reasonable costs of the repair or replacement of the damaged components of the pipeline. Processors shall have full use of the transmission pipeline, as an alternate or primary (at the discretion of the City) transmission of processed wastewater from its plant to the City’s Reuse Facility. 6. Default. In the event any Processor fails to make payment as provided in Section 4 above within thirty (30) days of the date due, a late fee in an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the payment shall be assessed and due and payable by Processor. In the event Processor fails to make payment, including the late fee, within sixty (60) days of the payment due date, the City may elect to accelerate Processor’s obligation at which time the entire unpaid principal balance, together with accrued interest, shall be payable in full. Processor shall not be entitled to any offset against the payments required under this Agreement for any reason. 7. Dispute Resolution. In the event of failure to make any of the payments as required above, and upon election by the City to accelerate that debt, venue for such action shall be in Franklin County, Washington, the laws of the State of Washington shall apply, and the prevailing party shall be awarded their reasonable fees and costs. In the event of any other dispute other than the payment of money, the parties shall first meet in a good faith attempt to resolve such dispute, with or without the assistance of mediation. In the event the dispute remains, it shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, and the Mandatory Rules of Arbitration (MAR). Venue shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington; the laws of the State of Washington shall apply; and the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs. 8. Supplemental Agreements. This Agreement applies only to the construction of the pipeline described in Section 1 above by the City, including the capital contributions by the Processors. Maintenance and operation of the pipeline, together with the Reuse Facility, is subject to a subsequent and supplemental agreement. 9. Assignability. This Agreement, and the rights and responsibilities hereunder, shall not be assigned, conveyed, sublet, or transferred by the Processor without the prior written consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 10. Notice. Any notice or information required or permitted to be given to the parties under this Agreement shall be to the following addresses, unless otherwise specified: Page 115 of 161 Foster Wells Force Main Reimbursement Agreement - 4 of 5 A. City of Pasco Mr. Dave Zabell, City Manager 525 North 3rd Pasco, WA 99301 (509) 545-3404 zabelld@pasco-wa.gov B. Reser’s Fine Foods, Inc. Mr. Mark Reser 15570 SW Jenkins Road Beaverton OR 97006-0003 C. Twin City Foods, Inc. Mr. Mark Lervick 10120 269th Place NW Standwood WA 98292 D. Pasco Processing, LLC Janelle McClory (jmcclory@westernmort.com) PO Box 3110 Pasco,WA 99302 CC: sschossberger@oregonpotato.com Notice shall be deemed given upon receipt of personal delivery, e-mail transmission, or three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail in the case of regular mail, or next day in the case of overnight delivery. 11. Modification. This Agreement may not be amended, modified, or termination except by written agreement signed and approved by all parties. 12. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective as of the _____ day of ___________, 2019, or upon the date of signature approval by the last party, whichever shall last occur. DATED this ________day of ____________, 2019. [Signature page follows] Page 116 of 161 Foster Wells Force Main Reimbursement Agreement - 5 of 5 CITY OF PASCO: By: ____________________________ Date: _______________________ Dave Zabell, City Manager RESER’S FINE FOODS, INC. By: ____________________________ Date: ______________________ Mark Reser, TWIN CITY FOODS, INC. By: _____________________________ Date: ______________________ Mark Lervick PASCO PROCESSING, LLC By: _____________________________ Date: ______________________ Steven Schossberger Page 117 of 161 Pasco City Council Meeting June 10, 2019 Foster Wells Force Main UpdatePage 118 of 161 PWRF EFFORTS 1.PWRF Capital Facilities 2.New Irrigation Pump Station 3.New Columbia East Pump Station 4.New Columbia East Force Mains 5.New Foster Wells Force Main 6.PWRF Pretreatment Improvements Page 119 of 161 NEW FOSTER WELLS FORCE MAIN DESCRIPTION: 2.4 Miles of 20 inch Force Main Connecting Foster Wells Pump Station to PWRF STATUS: Project currently advertised for bids WORK IN PROGRESS: Franklin County Right of Way Permit BPA Crossing Permit WSDOT Utility Franchise Permit Utility Easement Negotiations Reimbursement Agreement Page 120 of 161 New Foster Wells Force Main Page 121 of 161 New Foster Wells Force Main Estimated Project Schedule: Advertise for Bids –May 24 & May 31, 2019 Bid Opening –June 11 Council Bid Award –June 17 Begin Construction –Mid July Complete Construction –October 2019 Page 122 of 161 New Foster Wells Force Main Processor Reimbursement Agreement: Reviewed by all three Processors Out to Processors for signature Executed Agreement required prior to Bid Award Page 123 of 161 Questions?Page 124 of 161 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 3, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Department Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19 FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Senior Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA2018-008) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance Report to Planning Commission Dated: 5/16/2019 Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 3/21/2019 and 5/16/2019 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct impact. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Continued growth and the need to provide housing has prompted interest from local property owners, developers and staff on methods to increase housing stock. Housing constructed within the City of Pasco City Limits are required to meet the various requirements identified in the Pasco Municipal Code’s Subdivision Regulations (Title 21) and Zoning (Title 25). The standards and requirements in the PMC provide a mechanism for the regulation and division of land. While this creates a consistent and uniform manner for the city to develop there are some constraints that limit the potential for housing construction to occur in some areas. The Pasco Municipal Code requires all lots to abut on a street (PMC 21.20.050). However, the city contains lots, particularly west of Highway 395 and south of Page 125 of 161 Interstate I-182 that are land locked or have irregular shapes that limit the potential for public street frontage. Although these lots meet the lot size requirements to develop additional housing, the public frontage requi rement, which was written with traditional subdivision style development in mind, essentially prohibits the owners of many irregular, or partially developed large lots, from subdividing the property. Shared street frontages, or lots without public frontage provide the opportunity to increase density, allows for greater diversity of housing styles and types and promotes the infill of vacant or underutilized land within the city. The Planning Commission has considered this item at several workshops and m eetings beginning in late 2018. the Commission held a public hearing was on May 16th, 2019 and has recommended approval of the attached ordinance. V. DISCUSSION: City Council has identified increasing affordable housing as a Council Goal. Amending the Pasco Zoning Code to allow for greater flexibility in housing production is likely to assist in meeting those goals. Recent changes in Olympia, Spokane and Vancouver, Washington have included similar changes to their zoning requirements. Shared street frontages allow lots to have access via a private or shared driveway or street. This would enable the development of infill housing in vacant and underutilized lands to occur through the regulation of “flag lot” development. Flag Lots are defined as lots not meeting minimum frontage requirements and where access to the public right-of-way is by private driveway (PMC 25.15.140). The ordinance as drafted provides another option for the City to meet the goals and policies identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff requests Council consideration of this proposed code revision. Page 126 of 161 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington Amending Section 21.20 “Lots and Blocks” to Allow the creation of Residential Lots without Public Street Frontage WHEREAS, the City has pursuant to PMC 21.05.020 identified that regulating the division of land within the Pasco Urban Growth Area to promote the health, safety, convenience, comfort, prosperity and general welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the Pasco Urban Growth Area; and WHEREAS, the City has existing isolated lots where the width exceeds the depth, creating constraints for efficient use of underutilized properties; and WHEREAS, the requirement for public street frontage for each lot can prevent development and the efficient use of land; and WHEREAS, the City Comprehensive Plan identifies the encouragement of infill and density development to protect open space and critical areas, accommodate population increases and provide support for more walkable neighborhoods (LU-3-B); WHEREAS. “Flag Lots” are defined as lots not meeting minimum frontage requirements and where access to the public right-of-way is by a narrow private driveway, as defined in PMC 25.15.140; and WHEREAS, the City recognizes that providing shared street frontage for isolated residential lots (flag lots) may assist in meeting the goals of the City Comprehensive Plan, The Washington State Growth Management Act and City Council Goals. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 21.20.060 of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is created and shall read as follows: 21.20.060 LOTS WITHOUT PUBLIC STREET FRONTAGE (1) Characteristics Flag lot developments may be approved on a lot without full public street frontage in which access is provided by an approved private driveway / access strip. (2) Restrictions and Standards The City’s preferred standard for lot configuration are defined in Section 21.20.050. Creation of residential lots without public street frontage may be approved only by meeting the criteria identified in 21.20.060 (2) (a-n): Page 127 of 161 a) Allowed in residential zones where construction of a public street would prevent the achievement of the minimum residential density of the underlying zone designation; b) Permitted only where due to geometric, topographic, or other physical features in proportion to the size of the development, would be impractical to extend or build a publically dedicated street; c) Must be approved through Subdivision process identified in Title 21 of the Pasco Municipal Code; d) There shall be no more than three adjoining lots created without public street frontage; e) Emergency Access: When the furthest point of a proposed structure is greater than 150 feet in distance from the public right-of-way, as measured along an accessible route, an approved fire vehicle turnaround is required as defined by the International Fire Code f) Parking: No parking is permitted along the access (shared driveway) portion of the lot. The installation of No Parking signage may be required as a condition of approval; g) Utilities: Fire hydrants shall be located to meet the requirements of the International Fire Code. Extension of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water or other utility lines that results from the creation of lot(s), will be at the expense of the property owners and subject to approval by the City Public Works, Building and Fire departments; h) Drainage and storm water shall meet the requirements of PMC 16.10.050 i) Signage with addresses shall be posted on the public street side for all properties that are adjacent to any private shared driveway or access; j) Structural setbacks on lots without public street frontage shall conform to the requirements of the applicable zone; k) Access, maintenance and utility easements necessary to accommodate and maintain proposed driveway / shared access improvements and utilizes shall be approved through the Subdivision process in Title 21 and included on the face of the final plat; Page 128 of 161 l) Pavement sections for non-public street frontage driveway improvements are subject to approval by the Pasco Public Works and Fire Department. Gravel access will not be permitted; m) The shared driveway / access must be maintained by the Homeowners Association or by the adjoining property owners. A maintenance agreement must be recorded prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy and signage on the plat and must include provisions for snow removal, garbage pickup and any other necessary provisions as determined by the City; n) Access shared/common driveways for lots without public street frontage shall abide by the minimum frontage, pavement and easement widths shown in the table below: Lot Configuration Minimum Lot Frontage (Flag Width) Minimum Pavement Width Minimum Easement Width Single Family Detached; One Dwelling Unit per Lot 1 Lot 12 10 14 2 lots with adjacent flags 8 (per lot)15 19 3 lots with adjacent flags 8 (per lot)20 24 Multiple Dwellings Duplex on 1 lot (2 Units on 1 lot)12 15 20 Section 2. That Section 21.20.050 of the Pasco Municipal Code (Lot Requirements), shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: Every lot shall abut on a street. (1) Lots with double frontage shall be avoided when possible. (2) Corner lots in residential districts shall be designed to allow for appropriate setbacks of a building from both streets. (3) Side lines of lots shall be approximately at right angles to the street line or radial to curved street lines. (4) A plat containing lots adjacent to an arterial street shall not be approved unless the plat recites a waiver of the right of direct access to the arterial. Exceptions to this requirement may be permitted due to pre-existing development patterns that create practical difficulties for limiting arterial access. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.16.050.] (5) Lots without public frontage may be only be approved in residential zones where due to geometric, topographic, or other physical features in proportion to the size of the development, Page 129 of 161 would be impractical to extend or build a publically dedicated street. Regulations can be found in Section 21.20.060 of the PMC; Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as required by the law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, and approved as provided by law this ________ day of ____________________, 2019. _____________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________ __________________________ City Clerk City Attorney Page 130 of 161 MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers DATE: THURSDAY, May 16th, 2019 7:00 PM 1 TO:Planning Commission FROM:Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner SUBJECT:Shared Street Frontages (Lots) (MF# CA 2018-008) Background The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an update to the Planning Commission regarding the ongoing efforts to address appropriate infill and development strategies for the City. This item was introduced to the Planning Commission in late 2018 followed by a public hearing in February. It was postponed at the March 2019 meeting to allow for additional staff review, considerations and refinement. The discussions originate from the increasing need to accommodate housing needs in our city. Staff has coordinated the details of the ordinances for review including the impacts and relationship to housing, safety (fire and emergency) and transportation. The following ordinance was proposed: Ordinance: Residential Lots without Public Street Frontage (new) Attached to the staff report are references (sketches) and ordinance for your review. ______________________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION: MOTION: I move to close the public hearing on the proposed code amendments. MOTION: I move the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the adoption of the proposed code amendments for Shared Street Frontages as contained in the May 16th, 2019 Planning Commission staff report. Page 131 of 161 n) Lot Configuration Minimum Lot Frontage / Flag Width Minimum Pavement Width Minimum Easement Width Single Family Detached; One Dwelling Unit per Lot 1 lot 12 10 14 2 lots with adjacent flags 8 (for each lot) 15 19 3 lots with adjacent flags 8 (for each lot) 20 24 Multiple Dwellings Duplex on 1 lot (2 units on 1 lot) 12 (for each lot) 15 19 Page 132 of 161 SFDU – 1 Lot New Lot Existing Lot < - 14' Min Easment Width - > Min Pavement Width Min Lot Frontage Width<- 12' Min -> <-10' -> PUBLIC STREET Shared Frontage / Access Fire / Emergency Access: If length is 150 ft or more, turnaround required as per IFC. Page 133 of 161 SFDU – 2 Lots Adjacent Lot 2 Adjacent Lot 1 Existing Lot < - 19' Min Easment Width - > Min Pavement Width <- 16' Ft Min ->Min Lot Frontage Width <-15' -> PUBLIC STREET Shared Frontage / Access Fire / Emergency Access: If length is 150 ft or more, turnaround required as per IFC. Page 134 of 161 SFDU – 3 Lots Adjacent Lot 3 Adjacent Lot 2 Adjacent Lot 1 Existing Lot < - 24' Min Easment Width - > Min Pavement Width Min Lot Frontage Width< - 24' Min - > <-20' -> PUBLIC STREET Shared Frontage / Access Fire / Emergency Access: If length is 150 ft or more, turnaround required as per IFC. Page 135 of 161 MDU – Duplex New Lot Existing Lot < - 20' Min Easment Width - > Min Pavement Width Min Lot Frontage Width <-15' -> <- 12' Min -> PUBLIC STREET Shared Frontage / Access Fire / Emergency Access: If length is 150 ft or more, turnaround required as per IFC. Page 136 of 161 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers THURSDAY, MARCH 21, 2019 7:00 PM E. Code Amendment Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA 2018-008) Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the proposed code amendment for shared street frontages. The code amendment stems from the growing need to accommodate housing needs in the city and to help develop unique or difficult lots for infill development. There were two proposed ordinances; an ordinance amending PMC Section 21.20 “Lots and Blocks” to allow the creation of residential lots without public street frontages and an ordinance amending PMC Section 25.140 “Planned Unit Development”. Staff has coordinated the details of the ordinances for review including the impacts and relationship to housing, safety (fire) and transportation. It was discussed in detail what the proposed ordinances contained. There was discussion between the Planning Commissioner’s and staff regarding the details of the proposed code amendment and ordinances, in particular flag lots and PUD’s. Commissioner Mendez noted a typo in which Mr. Gonzalez said would be corrected. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Mendez, to postpone the proposal to a later date. The motion passed unanimously. Page 137 of 161 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2019 7:00 PM C. Code Amendment Code Amendment for Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA 2018- 008) – Continued from a previous meeting Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the code amendment for shared street frontages. The code amendment would allow for infill development in particular in areas with irregular lot shapes that are not able to develop with the current code that requires frontage. This would allow to develop with a private driveway. The criteria and standards were discussed in detail for development, fire and safety. This would be a tool for infill and not for regular development but would help meet housing goals. Chairwoman Roach asked if it would be written in the code to be used only for infill. Mr. Gonzalez explained that it would. Commissioner Myhrum asked about emergency access standards. Mr. Gonzales replied that cul de sacs would be preferred. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, added that it would be a 60’ radius turn around in the cul de sac. Commissioner Bowers asked about multiple dwellings that was given as an option and was concerned about density. Mr. Gonzalez stated that it would still have to meet the density standards of the zoning. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to close the public hearing on the proposed code amendment. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the adoption of the proposed code amendments for shared street frontages as contained in the May 16, 2016 Planning Commission staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Page 138 of 161 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 3, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19 FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Senior Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Special Permits (MF# CA2019-008) I. REFERENCE(S): Report to Planning Commission Dated: 5/16/2019 Exhibit 1 - Zoning Map Planning Commission Minutes Dated:5/16/2019 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: City staff received a request to amend the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) to include automobile wrecking yards as an unclassified use within the Special Permits chapter of Title 25 (Zoning). Staff and the Planning Commission reviewed the request and offers the information below for Council’s consideration. The applicant has submitted the request on behalf of a currently operating auto - wrecking yard business located in Pasco. A specific site or location for the business was not included in the request. The request was brought to the Planning Commission at the April 2019 meeting for discussion. May the at hearing public It an as held was 2019 open Planning Commission meeting. The staff report indicated that applications for Special Permits must undergo additional review the City Planning Commission and Council to allow Page 139 of 161 for the consideration of mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate negative impacts on surrounding uses. PMC 25.200.020 provides a description of unclassified uses. Unclassified uses are allowed in various zoning districts. A table and map were provided to the Planning Commission representing the zoning districts in which the code amendment would be applicable to. (See: Exhibit #1 Zoning Map) On May 16th, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing where they recommended the denial of the proposed code amendment. Staff and the Planning Commission received a letter from a local business supporting the denial of proposed amendment. V. DISCUSSION: Automobile wrecking yards are currently permitted in the I-2 (Medium Industrial) and I-3 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts. The proposed code amendment would be applicable via Special/Conditional Use Permit to the following zoning districts: • C-3 - General Business • BP - Business Park • I-1 - Light Industrial Neighboring jurisdictions limit automobile wrecking and storage sites to their heavier and more intense industrial or manufacturing districts. This item was also under consideration in late 2018 via a proposed code amendment to allow for the expansion of a non-conforming use. The applicant withdrew that request in February 2019. The Planning Commission in particular, noted the proximity of C-3 zoning districts to residential neighborhoods. For the reasons noted above and in the report, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to decline the proposed code amendment adding automobile wrecking yards as an unclassified use. Staff recommends that the City Council consider the requested amendment and the Planning Commission’s recommendation and provide direction regarding the requested amendment. A resolution reflecting Council’s deliberation and direction will be presented for formal action at the June 17th regular meeting of the City Council. Page 140 of 161 MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers DATE: THURSDAY, May 16th, 2019 7:00 PM 1 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MF # CA2019-008 – Special Permits City staff received a request to amend the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) to include automobile wrecking yards as an unclassified use within the Special Permits chapter of Title 25 (Zoning). Applications for special permits are required to undergo additional review by both the Pasco Planning Commission and City Council. This allows for mitigation measures to be considered to reduce or eliminate negative impacts on surrounding uses. The Special Permits Chapter, in 25.200 provides information on the uses, requirements and processes required for application. Unclassified Uses are described in 25.200.020 and the full list is provided below: PMC 25.200.020 Unclassified Uses The following uses shall be considered unclassified: (1) High schools, colleges, universities, vocational schools, business colleges and other similar academic or skills training facilities or institutions not heretofore permitted within any district; (2) Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, and other places of burial or interment of remains; (3) Churches; (4) Community service facilities, levels one and two, as defined in PMC 25.15.050; (5) Airports, heliports, or any other landing or maneuvering space for aircraft, together with terminals and other customary facilities accessory to the unclassified use; (6) Golf courses, pitch-and-putt courses, miniature golf courses, water parks, sports complexes, riding stables, and similar facilities for public, private or membership use; (7) Monasteries, convents or other functionally similar facilities; (8) Landfills, garbage dumps, and resource recovery facilities; Page 141 of 161 2 (9) Off-site parking lots, except those required for a residential use, provided such parking area is not more than 500 feet from the building; (10) Electrical substations and load transfer stations, natural gas booster stations, and other similar utility facilities; (11) Park-and-ride lots, off-street transfer stations or other similar facilities involving the storage, start-up, idling and movement of public or privately operated carriers, charter or transit buses, vans, and similar vehicles; and (12) Agricultural use (commercial), except in areas 1,000 feet from a residential zoning district, subdivision or dwelling unit. The proposed code amendment would add an additional unclassified use: (13) Automobile wrecking yards, subject to the performance standards of 25.120.020 (2) (a-e) The text referencing PMC 25.120.020 regards to the permitted uses of the I-2 (Medium Industrial District). (2) Junkyards, automobile wrecking yards, scrap iron, scrap paper, or rag storage, sorting or bailing shall be permitted, provided: (a) An eight-foot, sight-obscuring fence must be constructed and inspected prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for use of the goods. The fence shall be of solid single neutral color. (b) No automobile or parts thereof, junk or salvage materials or parts thereof shall be visible from any public right-of-way. All materials or parts shall be located within the fenced area. (c) Fire lanes shall be provided as required in the International Fire Code. (d) A performance bond for $1,000 shall be required prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, to ensure compliance with provisions of this section. The bond shall remain in force as long as the use exists. (e) The permit shall be granted for a period not to exceed two years, and at the end of such period an inspection shall be made of the premises to determine the advisability of renewing such permit. [Ord. 3354 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 25.54.020.] Page 142 of 161 3 A review of the Pasco Zoning Code was conducted and the table below represents zoning districts and the applicability of the code amendment. Zone Applicability C-1 – Retail Business District Not Permitted C-2 – Central Business District Not Permitted (PMC 25.90.050 (2)) C-3 – General Business District Requires Special/Conditional Use Permit (PMC 25.100.040) CR – Regional Commercial District Not Permitted BP – Business Park District Requires Special/Conditional Use Permit (PMC 25.110.040) I-1 – Light Industrial District Requires Special/Conditional Use Permit (PMC 25.115.040) I-2 – Medium Industrial District Permitted (PMC 25.120.020) I-3 – Heavy Industrial District Permitted (PMC 25.125.020) The map below depicts the zoning districts applicable through the approval of the proposed code amendment: Page 143 of 161 4 The City of Kennewick (WA) limits automobile wrecking and storage sites to their Heavy Industrial zoning district and the City of Richland limits locations within their Heavy Manufacturing District. The approval of the proposed code amendment would allow for currently operating or potential new business to open in applicable zoning districts. In addition to potential benefits of new businesses, staff encourages the Planning Commission also consider increased residential growth east of Oregon Avenue and potential impacts to surrounding communities. Staff recommends the denial of the code amendment request. Included in the report is the letter of support from the applicant and an enlarged map displaying applicable zoning districts. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed code amendments. OPTION #1 MOTION: I move to deny the proposed code amendment to the Pasco Municipal Code and not allow for the addition of automobile wrecking yards as an Unclassified Use as defined in PMC 25.200.020 OPTION #2 MOTION: I move to accept the proposed code amendments to the Pasco Municipal Code for the addition of automobile wrecking yards as an Unclassified Use to PMC 25.200.020 and schedule deliberations and a recommendation to City Council for the June 20th, 2019 Planning Commission Meeting. Page 144 of 161 Zoning District BP C-1 C-2 C-3 CR I-1 I-2 I-3 O R-1 R-1-A R-1-A2 R-1/PUD R-2 R-3 R-4 R-S-1 R-S-1/PUD RP RS-12 RS-20 RT Zoning selection City Limits Pasco Urban Growth Boundary ¯Page 145 of 161 Land Use Solutions & Entitlement Land Use Planning Services 9101 N. MT. VIEW LANE Spokane, WA 99218 509-435-3108 (V) 4-30-19 Mr. Rick White Community & Economic Development Director City Hall 525 N Third Avenue Pasco WA 99301 Ref: Draft Zone Code Amendment PMC 25.200. 020 Unclassified Uses Dear Mr. White: Upon review of Chapter 25 of the PMC, I find that there is very little language needing amendment to provide for automobile wrecking yard use within “Unclassified Uses”. In other words, simply add a new line item to 25.200.020 (13) Automobile Wrecking Yard. (See attached). This would then require the proposed use to become a Conditional Use Permit reviewed by the Planning Commission pursuant to the applicable provisions and procedures of said Chapter 25.200. As such, automobile wrecking yards would then be permitted by CUP as an Unclassified Use within the C-3 zone and the I-1 zone and be permitted outright within the I-2 and the I-3 zones. I would also point out that the I-2 zone has performance criteria for auto wrecking yards as well as similar outdoor open storage uses. Please note that I had originally suggested that this CUP adhere to the performance criteria spelled out within the I-2 zone under 25.120.020 (2) a-e. However, Chapter 25.200 seems to cover this aspect in 25.200.080. I was simply trying to address “automobile wrecking yards rather than other similar outdoor storage uses as mentioned within that sub-section. I will leave this recommendation for you and staff to make. Please let me know your thoughts and of course, when this is scheduled for a PC hearing. Thank you for your help in bringing about a better solution for a zoning dilemma. Respectfully Submitted Dwight J Hume Dwight J Hume Attached draft language Page 146 of 161 25.200.020 Unclassified Uses The following uses shall be considered unclassified: (1) High schools, colleges, universities, vocational schools, business colleges and other similar academic or skills training facilities or institutions not heretofore permitted within any district; (2) Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, and other places of burial or interment of remains; (3) Churches; (4) Community service facilities, levels one and two, as defined in PMC 25.15.050; (5) Airports, heliports, or any other landing or maneuvering space for aircraft, together with terminals and other customary facilities accessory to the unclassified use; (6) Golf courses, pitch-and-putt courses, miniature golf courses, water parks, sports complexes, riding stables, and similar facilities for public, private or membership use; (7) Monasteries, convents or other functionally similar facilities; (8) Landfills, garbage dumps, and resource recovery facilities; (9) Off-site parking lots, except those required for a residential use, provided such parking area is not more than 500 feet from the building; (10) Electrical substations and load transfer stations, natural gas booster stations, and other similar utility facilities; (11) Park-and-ride lots, off-street transfer stations or other similar facilities involving the storage, start-up, idling and movement of public or privately-operated carriers, charter or transit buses, vans, and similar vehicles; and (12) Agricultural use (commercial), except in areas 1,000 feet from a residential zoning district, subdivision or dwelling unit. [Ord. 4110 § 30, 2013; Ord. 3514 § 7, 2001; Ord. 3354 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 25.86.020.] (13) Automobile Wrecking Yards Page 147 of 161 Zoning District BP C-1 C-2 C-3 CR I-1 I-2 I-3 O R-1 R-1-A R-1-A2 R-1/PUD R-2 R-3 R-4 R-S-1 R-S-1/PUD RP RS-12 RS-20 RT Zoning selection City Limits Pasco Urban Growth Boundary ¯ 0 1 20.5 Miles EXHIBIT #1 - ZONING MAP Page 148 of 161 25.200.020 Unclassified Uses The following uses shall be considered unclassified: (1) High schools, colleges, universities, vocational schools, business colleges and other similar academic or skills training facilities or institutions not heretofore permitted within any district; (2) Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, and other places of burial or interment of remains; (3) Churches; (4) Community service facilities, levels one and two, as defined in PMC 25.15.050; (5) Airports, heliports, or any other landing or maneuvering space for aircraft, together with terminals and other customary facilities accessory to the unclassified use; (6) Golf courses, pitch-and-putt courses, miniature golf courses, water parks, sports complexes, riding stables, and similar facilities for public, private or membership use; (7) Monasteries, convents or other functionally similar facilities; (8) Landfills, garbage dumps, and resource recovery facilities; (9) Off-site parking lots, except those required for a residential use, provided such parking area is not more than 500 feet from the building; (10) Electrical substations and load transfer stations, natural gas booster stations, and other similar utility facilities; (11) Park-and-ride lots, off-street transfer stations or other similar facilities involving the storage, start-up, idling and movement of public or privately-operated carriers, charter or transit buses, vans, and similar vehicles; and (12) Agricultural use (commercial), except in areas 1,000 feet from a residential zoning district, subdivision or dwelling unit. [Ord. 4110 § 30, 2013; Ord. 3514 § 7, 2001; Ord. 3354 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 25.86.020.] (13) Automobile Wrecking Yards Page 149 of 161 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2019 7:00 PM D. Code Amendment Code Amendment Regarding Special Permits for Auto- Wrecking (MF# CA 2019-008) – Continued from a previous meeting Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the code amendment regarding special permits for auto- wrecking. The applicant wishes to amend the Pasco Municipal Code section regarding special permits to add an unclassified use to allow for automobile wrecking yards. Special permits are required to undergo special review by Staff, Planning Commission and City Council. Staff illustrated in the staff report where this code amendment could be applicable if approved. If permitted, it still would not be allowed in the C- 1 or C-2 zones but would be allowed via special permit in the C-3, BP and I-1 zoning districts. The zoning code already permits the use of auto-wrecking in I-2 and I-3 zoning districts. Because it is already allowed in the I-2 and I-3 zoning districts, City Staff did not recommend the approval of the code amendment. Dwight Hume, 9101 N. Mountain View Lane, Spokane, WA spoke on behalf of his client how currently owns an auto-wrecking yard in Pasco. His client is looking to remediate code enforcement violations because part of their business is on a non-conforming site. He discussed in detail the issues with non- conforming uses in Pasco. Commissioner Bowers asked for clarification to for the location of the non-conforming portion of his client’s property. Mr. Hume stated that it is an adjoining property. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, added that the location is on ‘A’ Street but the issues isn’t a site specific issues. This code amendment would apply city-wide. Commissioner Myhrum agreed with staff that this code amendment would not be optimal. He asked if there was a way to handle non-conforming use expansion on a case by case basis. Mr. Gonzalez stated that earlier in the year the Planning Commission did look at expansion of non- conforming uses but that request was withdrawn by the applicant to pursue this code amendment instead. Mr. White reminded the Planning Commission that they also didn’t express interest at that time in expanding non-conforming uses. Commissioner Myhrum asked if the applicant could apply for a rezone to conform. Page 150 of 161 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2019 7:00 PM Mr. White said rezones could be requested. In this case, it may need to be accompanied by a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Commissioner Bowers asked if the staff recommendation for denial of the code amendment was due to its proximity to residential. Mr. Gonzalez said the main reason was because there are already existing zones were this type of use is appropriate. Chairwoman Roach asked what Staff would recommend in this case for the auto-salvaging company in order to resolve their issues. Mr. White replied that Staff didn’t know if they could recommend anything. The Planning Commission needs to look at whether they are comfortable with wrecking yards in C-3 Zones. He briefly went over the history of the property in question and non-conforming uses. Commissioner Bowers said it is unfortunate that the applicant is having difficulties operating their business due to its non-conformity but with that said, she was not in favor of adding wrecking yards to the list of unclassified uses. Chairwoman Roach, Commissioner Myhrum and Commissioner A. Campos were in agreement with Commissioner Bowers. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to close the hearing on the proposed code amendment. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to deny the proposed code amendment to the Pasco Municipal Code and not allow for the addition of automobile wrecking yards as an Unclassified Use as defined in PMC 25.200.020. The motion passed unanimously. Page 151 of 161 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 6, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager Executive SUBJECT: Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) Risk Pool Update I. REFERENCE(S): Pasco 2014 - 2018 Risk Profile II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation to Council by Justin Tucker Safety/Training Specialist III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City has been a member of the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA), a self insurance risk pool of about 170 Washington cities and special purpose districts/entities, since 1986. The Authority is created by an interlocal agreement between the several entities and provides members with options for liability and property damage coverage in addition to several specialized coverages (cyber, boiler and machinery, special events, etc.) The City's participation is limited to liability (general and automobile) plus cyber coverage. The City has found that property coverage rates are more favorable with a local commercial broker as many natural hazard coverage costs can be minimized through underwriting (flood and earthquakes). In addition to coverage for liability exposures, WCIA also provides risk management consulting and training to assist members. As virtually all cities and most special districts have similar exposures, the Authority can offer services which are essentially custom developed for the City's needs. The presentation is designed to provide Councilmembers with an introduction to the Insurance Authority as well as to provide a review of the City's claim experience over the five year period of 2014 - 2018. V. DISCUSSION: Page 152 of 161 Risk Profile I City of Pasco6/10/2019Page 153 of 161 INTROPage 154 of 161 EXPECTED VS. ACTUALPage 155 of 161 EXPECTED VS. ACTUAL BY DEPARTMENTPage 156 of 161 CLAIM FREQUENCY AND SEVERITYPage 157 of 161 CLAIM SEVERITY 2014-2018Page 158 of 161 TOP LOSSES BY FREQUENCY AND SEVERITY 2014-2018Page 159 of 161 STEWARDSHIP REPORT 2014-2018Summary of BenefitsConsultation $11,562.30Grants $8,900.00Pre-Defense $27,479.10Reimbursement $12,231.33Total: $60,172.73Page 160 of 161 2019 TRAININGS TO MITIGATE RISK2019 Education January Full Board Session-Confronting Homelessness2019 May Full Board Education Session-WCIA insurance Coverage from A to UWCIA Parks and Recreation Forum-Risk ManagementBuilding Supervisory Skills 101Building Supervisory Skills 201Building Supervisory Skulls 301Employment Law for SupervisorsWCIA Parks and Recreation Forum-Risk Management WICA Parks and Recreation Forum-Risk Management2019 WCIA Spring Municipal Attorney TrainingEmployment Law for Supervisors2019 January Full Board Education SessionPublic Works Risk Management 1012019May Full Board Education Session Insurance CoverageBuilding Supervisory Skills 101Building Supervisory Skills 201Building Supervisory Skills 301Employment Law for SupervisorsWCIA Parks and Recreation Forum-Risk ManagementBuilding Supervisory Skills 301Building Supervisory Skills 101Building Supervisory Skills 201Page 161 of 161