HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019.06.10 Council Workshop PacketWorkshop Meeting
AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m.
June 10, 2019
Page
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:
4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
3 - 7 (a) Downtown Pasco Development Authority Funding Agreement
8 - 37 (b) PSD 2018 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report
38 - 69 (c) Presentation - WWTP Facility Plan Update
70 - 109 (d) 2020-2025 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan
110 - 124 (e) Foster Wells Force Main Update & Agreement
125 - 138 (f) Code Amendment: Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA2018-008)
139 - 151 (g) Code Amendment: Special Permits (MF# CA2019-008)
152 - 161 (h) Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) Risk Pool Update
Presentation to Council by Justin Tucker Safety/Training Specialist
5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
6. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
7. ADJOURNMENT.
REMINDERS:
1. Tuesday, June 11, 3:00-4:30 p.m. - PPFD Special Meeting - Conference Room 1
Page 1 of 161
Workshop Meeting June 10, 2019
(Councilmember Maloney, Rep.; Mayor Watkins, Alt.)
2. Thursday, June 13, 7:00-8:00 a.m. - BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee -
Cousin's Restaurant (Councilmember Alvarado, Rep.; Councilmember Serrano, Alt)
3. Thursday, June 13 7:00-8:00 p.m. - Ben-Franklin Transit Board - Transit Facility
(Mayor Watkins, Rep.; Councilmember Alvarado, Alt.)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and
streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance.
Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide
two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability. (Servicio de
intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal
dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad.)
Page 2 of 161
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 4, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19
FROM: Michael Morales, Deputy Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Downtown Pasco Development Authority Funding Agreement
I. REFERENCE(S):
Extension of DPDA Funding Agreement through December 31, 2019
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Consistent with the adopted 2019-2020 biennial budget.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City Council approved an extension of the DPDA funding agreement through June
30, 2019 in December 2018. The temporary extension was recommended in lieu of the
two year agreement because the DPDA Executive Director resigned December 14,
2018, and the board of directors and staff believed that it would be beneficial for a new
Executive Director to review and possible renegotiate some terms of a two year
agreement. Since that time, the DPDA has conducted a search for a new Executive
Director. While a broad range of qualified applications were submitted, before the
finalist interviews could be conducted, two applicants accepted other positions and the
third applicant withdrew their application from consideration.
The DPDA hiring committee has recommended that the search be suspended and
reopened in the 3rd Quarter of 2019. In the interim, the Operations Manager will
continue to serve with the responsibilities and authority of the Executive Director. For
these reasons, the DPDA board and staff are in agreement that an extension of the
agreement through the end of 2019 is in the best interest of the organization and its
future Executive Director.
Page 3 of 161
When the DPDA was formed, Council recognized that the DPDA would have
operational expenses exceeding revenues and most recently approved the latest funding
agreement with the DPDA, allocating an annual amount of $100,000 for 2017 and
2018 to supplement their revitalization efforts.
The extension of the agreement for 2019 will continue at the same funding level as
2018, and was included in the 2019-20 biennial budget.
V. DISCUSSION:
Council discussion of this approach is welcome.
Page 4 of 161
DOWNTOWN PASCO DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FUNDING AGREEMENT
T H IS AGREEMENT is m ade and e nt er ed into this .;?I day of f\.lov.embe C
20 16, b y and between the C it y of Pasco, Washington, a Muni c ipal Co rporation , herein after
referre d to as "City," and the Downtown Pasco Develo pment Authority, a no n-profi t Was hin gto n
Corporatio n , h erein a fter refe rred t o as "DPDA ."
WH EREAS , the City Council desires to foster re v italiz ation of the downtown bus iness
area and created the Downtown P asco Developme nt Authority (DPDA) in December 2 010 under
Ordinance No. 3985, with th e ex pectation of prov iding a three-yea r funding commitment to
permit the n ew agency to establi s h operations and demonstrate it s ability to fulfill the
r evitali zati o n goals enunciated in Ordinance No. 3985 a nd the DPDA C h a rter; and
WH EREAS , DPDA h as received a certificate of incorporation from the State of
Was hington as a non-profit corporation; and
WHEREAS, DPDA h as organi z ed and developed operating procedures, hired an initi a l
and a replacement executive directo r, reinitiated public events in D owntown Pasco (Cinco d e
Mayo and th e Fiery Foods Festival), undertake n m a n age m ent of th e Pasco Farmers Market a nd
Pasco Commercial Kitchen, b eca m e a 50l(c) (3) o rgani zation, became a certified Was hingto n
State Main Street organization, conducted se veral business educatio n classes and D ownto w n
c lean-up events, o rgani z ed and implemented a Peanuts Park r efurbi shme nt and (with C it y
financial ass is ta nce) completed a 5 year Strategic Work Pl a n in c ludin g web s ite revisio ns and
"branding;" and
WHERE AS, DPDA ta sks for 2 01 7 and 20 18 includ e impl e m entatio n of the "Passport to
Pasco Reward s Program," esta bli shm ent of a scholarship grant progra m consistent w ith th e
DPDA 's 50l(c)(3) status , initiating and completing a Downtown C u stomer Survey and
Downtown Pasco calendar; comple ting re staurant recruitment for vacant D owntown busi ness
sp ace; creating a nd maintaining a Do w ntown Property In vent o r y ; bus iness outreach effo rts
including a m ark eting/fundrai s ing pro gram and an a l ys is of th e fea s ibility of a "year round"
Farmers Market ; initiating a nd fillin g a p os iti o n for su st a inable fundrai s ing and other tasks
id e ntifi ed in the 5 Year Strategic W ork Plan; and
WHE REAS , DPDA lias r eques ted th at additi o n a l C ity funding b e made ava il able to
develop reso urces to eventually reduce th e amount of th e C it y subs id y ; NOW THEREFORE,
IN CON SID ERA TION of th e mutua l covenants conta ined h erein a nd other va luable
co nsi d eration, it i s agreed as fo ll ows:
Section 1: DPDA Responsibi,ities
The DPDA sh a ll conduct its act ivi ti es and efforts that further th e purpo se of the DPDA as
identified in Pasco Ordinance 3985 and Article IV of it s Ch arter to in cl ud e but not be limited to:
• Rev iew of C it y pl ans an d policies. T h e DPDA sh a ll r eview exis ting and evolvin g C it y
land use and capital improvement plans a nd policies affecting th e Dow ntow n Area a nd
a dv ise the c it y of appropriate co n siderations.
D PDA Funding Agreement -1
Page 5 of 161
• Facade Impro vement Program. The DPDA s hall pro vide information, appli ca ti ons a nd
profession a l assistance t o D owntown Area prope rty owners wishing to participa te in an
approved and funde d Communit y Development Block Grant fa9a de program .
• Promotio n a l Events. The DPDA s hould conduc t o r implement an additional promo ti o n a l
or s p ecial e vent in a dd it ion to C inco de Mayo and th e Fiery Foods Fes tival th at con trib ute
to the s uccess of the D ow nt own Area or oth e r wise ad van ce th e goal s of t he DPDA .
• Financing Strategy. In co ll aboration w ith C ity staff and/or other professionals, the DPDA
will d evelo p a comprehens ive in vento r y of public and pri vate capital and developme nt
financin g tool s and in centi ves that may be avail abl e to foster and s upport its re vita li z ation
effo rt s. T h ese should includ e tax credits or other incenti ves and identifi cati o n of
infras tructure and o th e r pub li c capital investme nts that may be necessary to suppo rt
pri va t e redevelopment projects.
• Marketing. The DPDA s h a ll dev elop a s trategy to identify a nd promote econo mi c v it a lity
of th e Downtown Area including the opportunities associated w ith the Farmer's Market
and Sp ecialty Kitchen . These strategies m ay include: creation of a Downtown Cale ndar,
quarterly business meetings for Downtown bus inesses , res ta urant recruitment for vacant
or available properties a nd completion of th e D owntown Survey.
• Farmer's Market and P asco Specialty Kitche n. The DPDA sh a ll optimi ze the
opportunities associated wi th th e Farmer's Market and Specialty Kitchen to increase
economic acti v ity a nd promote recogniti o n of the Dow ntown . Operation of th ese
fac ilities mus t be in accordance with the associated lease agreem e nt.
Repo rt s: A fo rmal prese ntatio n t o the C ity Coun c il b y the DPDA board sh a ll b e gi ven on
o r b efore March I each year. T h e DPDA s h a ll deli ver quarterly written status reports to t he
Pa sco City Manager detailing th e activ ities , accompli shments and fin an c ia l s ta tu s of th e DPDA.
Section 2: City Responsibilities
T h e C it y of Pasco w ill remit to DPDA o r it s des i g n ated bank up t o $25,000 per qu arter b y
th e I O'h day of the firs t month of said quarter.
Section 3: Term
This agreem e nt sh a ll be effective January I , 20 17 and sh a ll ex pire on Decemb er 3 1,
20 18; prov ided , however, either pa11y m ay termina te th e agreement w ith at least 180 d ays w ritte n
noti ce deli vered to the President of the DPDA or th e Pasco C ity Manager. It i s furth e r provided
t ha t thi s agreement i s predicated o n the DPDA maintaining its Main S t reet st a tu s fo r calendar
year s 20 17 and 20 18 a nd th e C ity's contri bution, as d escribed in Section 2, is d eem ed e li gi bl e for
Main Street tax c r edits by the State D epartment of R evenue. Should the DPD A become
in e li gibl e for Main Street tax c redi ts, thi s Agreement may be r eturned to the Pasco C it y Counci l
for determining its co ntinuati on.
Section 4: General Provisions
For th e purpose of thi s Agreem ent, tim e is of th e essence. Failure of the DPD A to either
provide th e accountin g or rem it disallowed fund s a s requ ired h e rei n s ha ll con stitu te a breach of
this agreement. T h e r e medi es avail able to th e Ci ty s h a ll include but n ot b e limited to , return of
DPDA Fu nding A g re e m en t -2
Page 6 of 161
all fund s delivered to the DPDA an d d e nial of the right of the DPDA to apply for any future
funding. In the event of a di sp ut e regarding the enforcement, breach, default or interpre ta ti on of
this Agreement, the parties sh a ll first meet in a good faith effort to reso lve such di spute. In the
eve nt th e di sp ute cannot be resol ved b y agree m ent of the parti es, said di spute s hall be res o lved
by arb itration purs uant to R CW 7.04A, as a m ended, and the Mandatory Arbitration Rul es
(MAR); ven ue sh a ll b e placed in Franklin County, Washington , the laws of the State of
Washington sh a ll appl y; and the prevailing p arty s h all be entitled to its reasonable a ttorn ey fees
and costs.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto ha ve caused this agreement to be executed
this a I 'day of Nch/-<Jm {oe v '2016.
C ITY OF PASCO
DPDA Fund ing A greement -3
DOWNTOWN PASCO D EVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
1 cob Gonzalez , (;lsid e nt
Page 7 of 161
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 3, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: PSD 2018 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report
I. REFERENCE(S):
School District Letter of Transmittal
PSD 2018 Capital Facilities Plan Update
Proposed Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
In January of 2011 the Pasco School District (PSD) informed City Council that there
was no longer the capacity to accommodate increased student enrollment due do
residential growth in the community. The District requested both the City and County
consider including the District’s Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) within their respective
Comprehensive Plans and adopt a school impact fee.
Council incorporated the District’s Capital Facilities Plan in the City’s Comprehensive
Plan in February of 2012 and in March of 2012 adopted Ordinance 4046 (establishing
school impact fees). An Interlocal Agreement for implementation and processing of
those fees was also approved by both the District and the City. The current impact fees
established by Council through Ordinance 4046 are $4,700 (of this amount $17 is
retained by the City for offsetting administrative costs) per single family unit and
$4,525 per multi-family unit.
One of the stipulations of the Interlocal Agreement is that the District provide a report
to the City on the impact fees including the source and amount of all monies received
Page 8 of 161
and the public improvements that were financed in whole or in part by the fees. This
report is prepared each year by the PSD.
The terms of the Interlocal Agreement also require the City to review and consider
biennial updates of the District’s CFP and if appropriate, incorporate the updated CFP
into our own capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan.
City Council considered the District's 2018 CFP update at the Workshop Meeting of
May 14, 2018 and a regular Council meeting of May 21, 2018. At the Workshop, there
was discussion relating to County - issued building permits and the relationship to the
School Impact Fee. Council reasoned it would be appropriate to defer action on the
District's CFP update until a track record of the District's efforts to collect school
impact fees from County developments was established.
Since that action in May of last year, County - issued building permits for new homes
outside the City limits but within the PSD has dramatically fallen off and there is no
empirical evidence to support the success of the District's efforts. In addition, the City
staff has since established conditions relating to use and extension of City water that
include payment of applicable impact fees and conformance with City development
regulations in a variety of circumstances.
V. DISCUSSION:
The District’s updated CFP contains a revised inventory of capital facilities -
recognizing the expansion of capacity as a result of the 2017 bond election, subsequent
new elementary and middle school construction and reconfiguration of the classes
attending middle schools. Forecast enrollment figures for the next 6 years show that
the District will increase a total (K through Grade 12) of approximately 3000 students.
The 2018 District CFP Update and impact fee calculation contains revised new facility
costs per dwelling unit based on the forecast student growth, the facilities that are
needed to serve that growth and the estimated costs for those facilities. The newly
calculated impact fee amounts (based on the accepted state-wide formula used in
Ordinance 4046 adopted in 2012) for single family dwellings is $5,770 and for multi -
family dwellings is $6,135. The District is not requesting an increase or change in the
amount of the established school impact fees of $4,700 per single family unit and
$4,525 per multi-family unit at this time.
Per State law, the District is precluded from using school impact fees for projects that
are not included as a part of the capital facilities element of an adopted Comprehensive
Plan. In this case, the District’s 2018 CFP includes a fourth high school as a growth-
related project and the District is hoping to use impact fee revenue to pay for a portion
of this project (including a current need to pay for site studies relating to school
development of the PSD property on Burns RD). However, the District is precluded
from using impact fees for this purpose until the City adopts the District’s 2018 CFP
Page 9 of 161
update by reference in the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Although the District's protocol
for seeking school mitigation fees under the State Environmental Policy Act outside
the City limits has not been squarely tested, City staff believes that the District’s
strategic use of the State Environmental Policy Act and the current process of
conditioning extension of City utilities guarantee that applicable mitigation fees will be
paid for residential development within the County.
Staff recommends Council's favorable consideration of the District's request for
inclusion of the latest CFP into the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Page 10 of 161
Pasco School District #1
C. L. Booth Education Service Center
1215 W. Lewis Street • Pasco, Washington 99301
Board of Directors • (509) 546-2801 • FAX (509) 543-6781
Equal Opportunity Employer
May 10, 2018
Mayor and Members of the Pasco City Council
525 North 3rd Ave
Pasco, WA 99301
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:
On behalf of the Pasco School District Board of Directors, I am writing to thank you for your
ongoing support of Pasco Public Schools, through among other things, the adoption and
implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance (Ordinance 4046). As required by the
Ordinance, the District has updated its Capital Facilities Plan. We are submitting the enclosed
2018 Update of the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan with a request that you continue to collect
school impact fees in the amount that was adopted in 2012.
Going forward, enrollment in the District is expected to continue to increase, with the majority of
the growth occurring in grades K-6. As reflected in the enclosed CFP Update, the District will
serve the forecast growth by completing the 2017 bond projects to construct new schools, adjust
portable classroom locations, and make improvements to Support Services to meet capacity
demands. The estimated cost for these improvements is over $150,000,000. The District will
pay for the improvements with bond proceeds, state construction fund dollars and impact fees, as
reflected in the finance plan in the CFP Update.
We understand that the imposition of school impact fees may be unpopular with some of the
people or organizations we are all elected to represent. At the same time, continued collection of
school impact fees is necessary to provide school facilities for students living in new housing.
The entire community benefits when we have quality schools, and the District relies on impact
fees to help provide those schools.
We appreciate our collaboration with the City through adoption and implementation of the
School Impact Fee Ordinance. We will renew our request to have a similar ordinance adopted in
Franklin County and until such time as the County adopts a school impact fee ordinance, we will
continue to request that every new residential development in the County mitigate impacts on
schools.
Page 11 of 161
Celebrating academics, diversity and innovation.
If you have any questions regarding the District’s 2018 CFP Update, or our request and need for
school impact fees, please contact Superintendent Whitney at 509.546.2800.
Sincerely,
Steven Christensen, President
Board of Directors
Pasco School District No. 1
cc: Michelle Whitney, Superintendent
Dave Zabell, City Manager
Page 12 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 1 of 23
May 2018
PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1
2018 UPDATE TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Steve Christensen, President
Amy Phillips, Vice President
Sherry Lancon, Member
Scott Lehrman, Member
Aaron Richardson, Member
SUPERINTENDENT
Michelle Whitney
Adopted. by the Pasco School Board
on May 8, 2018
Page 13 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 2 of 23
May 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section 1 Introduction……………………………….....3
Section 2 Program Standards…………………………6
Section 3 Capital Facilities Inventory………………..8
Section 4 Enrollment Projections & Capacity…….10
Section 6 Financing Plan……………………………..12
Section 7 School Impact or Mitigation Fees………13
Appendices
Appendix A—Charts & Supporting Data……….15
Building Capacity………………………….16
Building Condition Scores……………….17
Projected Enrollments…………………….18
Needed Capacity…………………………...19
Necessary Improvements & Costs……..20
Capital Facilities Financing Plan………..21
Appendix B—Impact Fee Calculations…………22
2018 Impact Fee……………………………23
Page 14 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 3 of 23
May 2018
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose of the 2018 Update to the Capital Facilities Plan
The Pasco School District (the “District”) in 2011 first adopted a Capital Facilities Plan (the
“2011 CFP”) in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act, Chapter
36.70A RCW (the “GMA”), and City of Pasco Ordinance 4046 (the “School Impact Fee
Ordinance”). The City of Pasco adopted the 2011 CFP on April 16, 2012, and adopted updates
to the CFP in 2014 and 2016.
Section 3.133.025 of the School Impact Fee Ordinance describes the elements that must be
addressed in the CFP. They include “the District’s standard of service, an inventory of facilities,
capacity by grade span, a six year enrollment forecast, facility needs and costs, a f inance plan
and calculation of the school impact fees.” Once the CFP with these elements is adopted, the
Ordinance says “[t]he District shall file an update to its capital facility plan at least once every
two years.” And, “[a]t lease once every two years, commencing on April 15, 2014, the City
Council shall review and consider the District submitted capital facilities plan update.”
This 2018 Update is submitted to comply with the above requirements in the School Impact Fee
Ordinance. The Update supplements and updates the core information in the 2011 CFP. The
2018 update also includes an updated calculation for the District’s school impact fees.
B. Changes in the Pasco School District
The District now serves 18,101 students (OSPI Form 1049, October 1, 2017), an increase of
2,111 students since 2012. Steady residential development within the district’s boundaries
continues. The latest demographics study (MGT of America, 2017, Chart 3 herein) projects
that residential growth will continue at a moderate rate over the six-year planning period and
beyond. Since 2012, the City of Pasco has approved the construction of 1,925 single family
units and 233 multi-family units (through March 2018).
To construct all the improvements that are required to serve existing needs (including those
from recent residential growth) and forecasted growth, the District asked its voters in
November 2017 to approve a $99.5 million bond measure. The District’s voters passed the
2017 bond with a 60.07% yes vote (approval of a bond requires 60% yes votes).
Previously, the last bond to pass was November 2013. This bond was developed with several
strategies to significantly reduce the cost of the bond projects after the previous bond failed
with a 48% yes vote in April 2011. The most significant measure was to reconfigure grade level
groupings to delay the construction of a more expensive per-pupil middle school. District
facilities planning to provide capacity to serve students has since been based upon this and
other measures taken after the April 2011 bond election failure.
• A community task force was engaged to provide recommendations to the board of
directors regarding strategies for handling enrollment growth. The task force
considered multi-track/year-round options, and recommended another less
expensive bond be submitted to voters as soon as possible.
• Based on the task force recommendations, the next bond in February 2013 was
developed with the direction that an additional elementary school would be built
Page 15 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 4 of 23
May 2018
because it was less expensive than a middle school, and the District would use the
additional elementary capacity to house 6th grade students at the elementary level
instead of the middle level.
• The three elementary schools approved in the 2013 bond opened in the 2014-2015
school year (one school) and the 2015-2016 school year (two schools). The added
capacity allowed the District to complete the plan to transition to a K-6 and 7-8
grade configuration in 2015-2016.
The November 2017 bond will fund additional capacity at the elementary level with two new
schools and at the middle level with funding to construct Middle School #4 and replace and
expand Stevens Middle School. In June 2017 the District’s Community Builders Group
recommended these projects for the bond, with the understanding that the additional
middle level capacity would cause the district to transition 6th grade back to the middle
school.
The District has continued to engage in cost-saving measures in facilities planning, and will
continue to use cost-reduction strategies and District construction standards to save
taxpayer dollars. Pasco School District’s construction costs have normally been lower than
other school construction costs around the State of Washington. Examples of cost-
reduction strategies includes the following:
• Use property already owned by the district for school sites;
• Use the updated Pasco design that has been built multiple times for Pasco schools,
thereby saving A/E, construction and maintenance costs;
• Curie and Whittier Elementary Schools share one playground, reducing the amount
of land to be purchased;
• Build larger elementary schools to reduce the total number needed and create
efficiencies in operations;
• Build schools to serve at least 50 years;
• Maintain school buildings well to ensure they last several decades; and
• Since middle school student enrollment was reduced in 2015 by keeping 6th grade
at the elementary school, and elementary enrollments increased, unused portable
classrooms on middle school campuses have been moved to provide temporary
capacity at the elementary level.
The voters of Washington state passed Initiative 1351 in 2014. The initiative imposes class
size values as recommended by the and the Legislature’s Quality Education Council (QEC).
The class size requirements have been implemented in part and delayed in part. Under the
Supreme Court’s McCleary decision, the Legislature is under court order to fully fund basic K-
12 education, including the K-3 class size reductions. Initiative 1351 class sizes are reflected in
Chart 1 and position the District for full legislative implementation.
The District implemented All-Day Kindergarten (ADK) in every elementary school in the 2015-
2016 school year. The District added portable classrooms to meet this requirement.
In Chart 2 in the Appendix, State scoring matrices show that Pasco School District is
effectively maintaining its schools as a community investment and asset, according to a third
Page 16 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 5 of 23
May 2018
party review. The schools’ adjusted maintenance score is significantly above its expected
score for the facility’s age, demonstrating effective maintenance by the district. These data
mean that they will last longer and be able to serve more students before needing to be
replaced.
Page 17 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 6 of 23
May 2018
SECTION 2
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARDS
The District’s core and special program needs, which are used to define the standard of service,
are addressed in the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan. The District has implemented K-3 class
size reduction and All Day Kindergarten and is positioned to implement I-1351’s targets for
grades 4-12 . Below is the District’s adopted educational program standards (or standard of
service).
A. Elementary Educational Program Standards
The state is required to provide funding for a student-to-teacher ratio of 17-1 in grades K-3 (15-1
for high poverty schools), consistent with QEC recommendations, Initiative 1351, and McCleary.
The class size of 15 will impact eleven elementary schools which qualify as high poverty. The
remaining four elementary schools will be impacted by the class size of 17.
Elementary Class Size Requirements-Initiative 1351
Grades K-3 Enacted by the Legislature
Grades 4-12 Implementation Delayed
Grade
Levels
Initiative 1351
Class Sizes
District Contract
Class Sizes
High-Poverty Schools Non-High Poverty Schools 2017
K-1 15 17 24
2-3 15 17 27
4-6 25 28
4 22
5-6 23
Capt. Gray Markham
Whittier McClintock
Robinson Livingston
Longfellow Angelou
Chess
Emerson
Frost
Twain
Curie
Franklin
McGee
B. Middle and High School Program Standards
Secondary (Middle and High) school class size standards also are projected to be reduced to
levels set by Initiative 1351 with recommendations to be mandated under McCleary as noted
below.
Page 18 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 7 of 23
May 2018
Secondary Class Size Requirements-Initiative 1351
Grades K-3 Enacted by the Legislature
Grades 4-12 Implementation Delayed
Grade
Levels
Initiative 1351
Class Size
District Contract
Class Size
High-Poverty Schools Non-High Poverty Schools 2017
7-8 23 25 *30
9-12 23 25 *30
*Max
Stevens MS 155/day
Ochoa MS
McLoughlin MS
Pasco HS
Chiawana HS
New Horizons HS
Page 19 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 8 of 23
May 2018
SECTION 3
CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY
As described in the 2011-2017 CFP, the District’s facilities inventory establishes a baseline for
determining the facilities necessary to accommodate future demand (student enrollment) at
acceptable levels of service. Three schools have been added since the 2014 update to the
CFP, resulting in an increase to the permanent capacity calculation. Elementary schools and
middle schools will be added through 2023. The District will also move portables between
schools and grade levels as additional capacity is needed.
A. Capacity Calculation and Standard of Service
The District’s Board of Directors directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of school
building capacity in 2017. The purpose of the review was to ensure consistent, reasonable
measures were being used to determine the capacity of each school building, and to provide a
safe and equitable standard of service for students throughout the school system.
Student safety has been a critical consideration for the District in determining this standard of
service. In 2014 and again in 2018, the District conducted a comprehensive safety review of
schools, including brick and mortar buildings and portable classrooms. It is the District’s goal to
house students in permanent facilities with controlled points of access, which can be best
accomplished by housing students in one contained brick and mortar building. Portable
classrooms will continue to be used as a temporary solution to provide student housing.
However, to achieve the desired standard of service to enhance student and staff safety,
portable classrooms should not be counted in the District’s permanent classroom inventory.
The state does not count portable classrooms when calculating a school district’s classroom
inventory for purposes of eligibility for state assistance for construction. In the 2011-2017 CFP,
the District counted some portables into the permanent capacity calculation after consultation
with the City of Pasco. Based on the above considerations, however, the 2017 CFP update
does not include portable classrooms in calculating permanent capacity but still recognizes the
capacity purpose.
B. Elementary Schools
The District currently has fifteen (15) elementary schools. Thirteen (13) of these schools serve
grades K-6, one (1) serves grades K-2, and one (1) serves grades 3-6. The fifteen (15)
elementary schools provide capacity to serve 7,167 students in permanent capacity. As of
October 1, 2017, there were 10,164 elementary students enrolled.
There are 139 portable classrooms at the elementary schools providing additional capacity to
house 2,489 students. Since 2014, the District has added 33 new portable classrooms as
temporary capacity. This includes the modification of septic and water service at Markham
elementary to allow expansion through the addition of portables which was completed in 2015.
Two new elementary schools, providing additional capacity for 1,240 elementary students, will
be constructed by 2023.
The District purchased the former Pasco Senior Center and an adjacent vacant lot from the City
in 2016 for the purpose of the converting the building into an early learning facility. The District
Page 20 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 9 of 23
May 2018
pursued, and was granted, two capital appropriations from the state totaling $1.3 million dollars
to help offset the costs. The Early Learning Center opened in January 2018, with designated
programs transitioned to the Center by September 2018. In addition, the District has leased the
former Kids World daycare facility on North 20th Avenue in Pasco to provide additional
classrooms for early learning. These projects have allowed the District to provide additional
capacity for K-6 students in elementary buildings by relocating early learning classes from the
elementary buildings to the new facilities.
C. Middle Schools
The District has three middle schools serving grades 7-8. The middle schools provide
permanent capacity to serve approximately 2,457 students. As of October 1, 2017, there were
2,693 students enrolled in those schools.
There are 46 portable classrooms at the middle schools providing additional capacity to house
874 students. Since 2011, the District added sixteen (16) new portable classrooms as
temporary capacity at the middle school level.
Middle School #4 and the replacement and expansion of Stevens Middle School will add
permanent capacity for approximately 995 students by 2023. The District also plans to add
portable capacity at the middle school level during the six years of this CFP (either newly
purchased or relocated from the elementary grade level).
D. High Schools
As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP, there are two traditional high schools serving
grades 9-12. There is permanent capacity to serve 3,716 students in the high schools. As of
October 1, 2017 there were 5,225 students enrolled. Pasco High School has additional capacity
to serve students in (25) portable classrooms and Chiawana High School has additional
capacity to serves students in 16 portable classrooms added to the campus in 2017.
New Horizons High School moved into a leased brick and mortar building on the Columbia
Basin College campus in 2017. The building capacity is 206.
E. Support Facilities
Bus parking has been expanded into the District’s maintenance lay-down yard at the Port of
Pasco property (Building 210). The District leased additional space from the Port to replace the
lost lay-down yard capacity, and is also leasing additional warehouse space. The November
2017 bond will provide funding for expansion of transportation and maintenance facilities.
F. Land Inventory
The District currently owns nine unimproved parcels, totaling approximately 146 acres. Two
sites will be the location of schools from the 2017 bond, bringing the District’s total available
unimproved property to 82 acres. The District plans to acquire additional property for future
schools.
Page 21 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 10 of 23
May 2018
SECTION 4
STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
AND CAPACITY BY GRADE SPAN
A. Projected Student Enrollment
Since 2016, the District received and reviewed four enrollment forecasts. For purposes of the
2018 CFP Update, the District is relying on the comprehensive forecast provided by MGT of
America. See Appendix, Chart 3.
In October 2011, there were 15,707 students enrolled in grades K-12. In October 2017, there
were 18,101 students enrolled, which is an increase of 2,394 students. By 2023, the forecast
predicts there will be 21,170 students enrolled in grades K-12, which is an additional 3,069
students over 2017. The District will need to add permanent and temporary capacity at the
elementary and secondary levels to serve the growth.
B. Capacity by Grade Span
Current enrollment at each grade level is identified in Chart 1 , which provides the actual
enrollment in District facilities as of October 1, 2017. Projected available student capacity
was derived by subtracting projected student 2023 enrollment (Chart 3 ) from total existing
October 2017 school capacity (Chart 1 ).
Enrollment in grades K-8 is expected to grow by approximately 1,969 students by 2023. At the
same time, class size standards have been reduced by the state, and further implementation of
reduced class sizes is expected. Based on the forecast enrollment increase, and without
considering planned projects (which will add a total of 2,235 new permanent K-8 seats), the
District will need to add capacity at the K-8 level for 1,859 students.
Enrollment in grades 9-12 is currently 5,225. High school enrollment is forecasted for continued
growth, adding more than 1,100 students by 2023. The District has added capacity for additional
students at New Horizons and Pasco High School. However, the District will need to add
capacity for 1,839 students at the high school level.
The current capacity in the existing schools and the capacity that is needed to serve forecast
growth through 2023 was revised based on class size reduction targets and construction
projects completed through the date of this CFP. Please see Chart 4 in the Appendix. Chart 4
does not consider capacity additions planned through 2023 and beyond.
Page 22 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 11 of 23
May 2018
SECTION 5
CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS
To determine future facility needs, existing school program capacity was compared to
projected enrollment throughout the six-year forecast period. See Section 4.
In November 2017, the District’s voters passed a $99.5 million bond measure to help fund the
construction of two new elementary schools, a new middle school, the expansion and
replacement of Stevens Middle School, safety and health improvements at various schools, and
improvements to the District’s transportation and maintenance facilities. See Chart 5, Appendix.
The District expects that all of the new capacity projects will be complete no later than the
2023-24 school year. Portable classrooms will be used to provide temporary facilities while
funding is secured to construct brick and mortar facilities. The new schools and portable
classrooms will provide the needed capacity identified in Section 4 above.
In addition to building schools that add capacity for growth, the District will make other
improvements to serve students. The improvements will be constructed in phases and cannot
occur until bonds are approved by the voters. The District will continue with long term facilities
planning efforts using community recommendations to identify which projects should be
prioritized.
The District will continue to plan for needs beyond 2023. Chart 5 includes estimated permanent
improvements and capacity conditioned on future funding. Future updates to this CFP will
provide more specific information as to the District’s updated planning beyond the 2017 Bond
projects.
Page 23 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 12 of 23
May 2018
SECTION 6
CAPITAL FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
The District's ability to fund the planned improvements that will add capacity is dependent upon
the passage of bond elections at a 60% supermajority and receipt of State Construction
Assistance Program (SCAP) funds, also known as “state match” funds. Costs for improvements
that add capacity are used to calculate school impact fees. School impact fees, or SEPA
mitigation fees collected from some new development projects in unincorporated Franklin
County, will be used to pay for a portion of the improvements that add capacity. The majority of
the costs to construct the capacity improvements will be paid for with bonds and state match
funds. See Section 6 of the 2011 CFP for a complete discussion regarding the framework for
financing planned improvements.
The District was not awarded a K-3 class size reduction grant as referenced in the 2016 update
to the Capital Facilities Plan. Therefore, to serve growth and address class size reduction, the
District plans to construct new schools and expand additional schools consistent with the
funding identified in this CFP.
In addition to construction of facilities to add capacity, the District also needs to acquire school
sites for future construction, and must make a variety of improvements that are needed at
existing facilities. A key Community Builders Group recommendation was to address capital
facilities needs related to safety and health.
The Capital Facilities Financing Plan in Chart 6 demonstrates how the District intends to fund
new construction and improvements to school facilities during the six-year planning period.
Page 24 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 13 of 23
May 2018
SECTION 7
SCHOOL IMPACT OR MITIGATION FEES
The District’s ability to fund the improvements that are needed to serve forecast growth depends
on new development contributing to the cost to build the schools that will serve the students that
live in new housing. The District is collecting school impact fees from development in the City
and will continue to request mitigation fees from developers in Franklin County (and continue to
request that Franklin County adopt a GMA-based school impact fee ordinance). The District
files annual reports with the City regarding the use of the school impact fees.
The District has calculated school impact fees using a standard school impact fee formula,
adopted by the City of Pasco and many other Washington cities and counties, that complies
with the Growth Management Act. The resulting figures are based on the District’s cost per
dwelling unit to construct schools needed to serve new development. A student factor (or
student generation rate) is used to identify the average cost per dwelling unit by measuring the
average number of students generated by each housing type (single-family dwellings and multi-
family dwellings). The District hires a consultant to update the student factor methodology
based upon the last six years of residential development data within the District , as
required by t he City of Pasco School Impact Fee Ordina nce. As required under the GMA,
credits are applied in the formula to account for State School Construction Assistance funds to
be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit.
The costs of projects that do not add capacity are not included in the impact fee calculations.
Furthermore, impact fees will not be used to address existing deficiencies.
The following projects are included in the impact fee calculation:
• New Elementary School (based on the average cost of Elementary 16 and 17); and
• New Middle School.
Please see Chart 6. Elementary #16, Elementary #17, Middle School #4, and the expanded
capacity at Stevens Middle School are eligible for impact fee funding as growth related projects.
The calculated impact fee amounts (reduced by 25%), in Appendix B, are $5,770 for each single
family residence and $6,135 for each multi-family residence. However, the District is requesting
the City continue collecting the current amounts which are:
Single Family: $4,700
Multi Family: $4,525
The District began receiving impact fees from the City in 2012. Through December 2017, the
District has received approximately $9,426,689 in impact fee revenue. Of that amount,
$1,250,000 was used to reduce the principal of the 2013 bond, $2,208,772 was used to pay for
a portion of the 2015-2016 portable classrooms, and $1,164,955 was spent to acquire land in
2017. The District plans to use remaining revenue for portables to accommodate enrollment,
land acquisition, and reducing the cost of the 2017 Bond projects. The District will use future
impact fees as allowed by law for growth-related impacts identified in the CFP.
Page 25 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 14 of 23
May 2018
CONCLUSION
The District continues to use a variety of strategies to plan, reduce costs, and mitigate the
effects of student enrollment growth. Receipt of impact fees remains critical to ensuring the
District can manage growth by providing sufficient student facilities. The forecast of steady
enrollment growth over the next six years underscores the need to use a variety of financing
measures, including the passage of bonds, expenditure from the General Fund, and impact
fees/SEPA mitigation fees to meet the needs of the community.
Page 26 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix A
Page 15 of 23
May 2018
APPENDIX A
Charts with Supporting Data
Page 27 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix A
Page 16 of 23
May 8, 2018
Chart 1
Building Capacity
October 1, 2017
*Building Capacity is the number of classrooms multiplied by the weighted average I-1351 class size for
non-high poverty schools, multiplied by a utilization factor to allow for planning time and other uses.
Elementary Schools Grades
Served
Building
Classrooms
Building
Capacity
Temp Portable
Classrooms
Temp Portable
Capacity
Total
Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017
Enrollment
Gray K-6 25 449 10 180 35 629 551
Markham K-6 14 251 10 180 24 431 397
McGee K-6 22 388 14 251 36 639 666
Twain K-6 27 463 15 262 42 725 755
Angelou K-6 32 567 12 215 44 782 898
Livingston K-6 22 395 17 305 39 700 780
Whittier K-2 26 452 12 215 38 667 606
Robinson K-6 33 578 12 215 45 793 773
Emerson K-6 26 452 7 126 33 578 690
Longfellow K-6 24 416 4 72 28 488 466
Frost K-6 26 445 9 162 35 607 650
Chess K-6 27 477 9 162 36 639 533
Franklin K-6 35 614 6 108 41 722 804
McClintock K-6 34 596 2 36 36 632 754
Curie 3-6 36 624 0 0 36 624 841
Totals 409 7,167 139 2,489 548 9,656 10,164
Middle Schools Grades
Served
Building
Classrooms
Building
Capacity
Temp Portable
Classrooms
Temp Portable
Capacity
Total
Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017
Enrollment
McLoughlin 7-8 46 863 28 532 74 1,395 1,285
Stevens 7-8 38 740 12 228 50 968 708
Ochoa 7-8 44 854 6 114 50 968 700
Totals 128 2,457 46 874 174 3,331 2,693
High Schools Grades
Served
Building
Classrooms
Building
Capacity
Temp Portable
Classrooms
Temp Portable
Capacity
Total
Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017
Enrollment
Chiawana 9-12 109 1,984 16 300 125 2,284 2,717
Pasco 9-12 82 1,526 25 469 107 1,995 2,239
New Horizons 9-12 11 206 0 0 11 206 269
Totals 202 3,716 41 769 243 4,485 5,225
District Total 739 13,340 226 4,132 965 17,472 18,082
Page 28 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix A
Page 17 of 23
May 2018
Chart 2
Pasco School District Asset Preservation Program
2017 Building Condition Scores
OSPI 2015 2016 2017
Building
Age in
Years
Current
Draft Score
by Age
Adjusted
B.C.E.
Adjusted
B.C.E.
Adjusted
B.C.E.
Emerson 21 74 87.94 86.96 85.69
Frost 21 74 86.44 84.09 82.98
Franklin 4 95 100 100 99.06
McClintock 3 97 NA 98.52 97.69
Curie 3 97 NA 100 99.90
Chiawana High School 9 90 95.30 95.30 94.49
Delta High School 3 97 NA 95.56 96.10
“B.C.E.” is the Building Condition Evaluation score given by OSPI for those facilities in which
State School Construction Assistance Program (state match) dollars were used. The
Current Draft Score” is OSPI’s expected score for the age of the facility, given average use
and maintenance.
Pasco High School is no longer assigned a B.C.E. score for purposes of state reporting
because of the age of the facility. However, the district continues to monitor and score Pasco
High School for internal monitoring purposes.
Page 29 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix A
Page 18 of 23
May 2018
Chart 3
MGT of America
Projected Enrollments
Grade 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
K 1,455 1,480 1,491 1,530 1,520 1,528 1,521 1,539 1,552 1,558
1 1,475 1,519 1,502 1,585 1,617 1,646 1,664 1,682 1,693 1,726
2 1,465 1,437 1,463 1,581 1,644 1,674 1,694 1,703 1,736 1,754
3 1,424 1,449 1,458 1,579 1,616 1,656 1,668 1,689 1,701 1,731
4 1,526 1,524 1,587 1,687 1,741 1,781 1,809 1,820 1,847 1,869
5 1,547 1,568 1,565 1,709 1,748 1,782 1,810 1,837 1,856 1,880
6 1,484 1,506 1,538 1,565 1,674 1,716 1,713 1,774 1,792 1,822
7 1,443 1,524 1,491 1,540 1,515 1,574 1,600 1,620 1,672 1,715
8 1,298 1,299 1,436 1,415 1,469 1,489 1,516 1,557 1,596 1,619
9 1,430 1,520 1,498 1,581 1,613 1,484 1,455 1,492 1,478 1,555
10 1,332 1,316 1,458 1,509 1,513 1,526 1,536 1,512 1,574 1,618
11 1,304 1,426 1,430 1,441 1,526 1,608 1,631 1,681 1,718 1,783
12 1,297 1,286 1,411 1,474 1,592 1,707 1,762 1,790 1,819 1,824
TOTAL 18,479 18,854 19,328 20,195 20,788 21,170 21,380 21,697 22,034 22,454
Page 30 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix A
Page 19 of 23
May 2018
Chart 4
2023 Student Capacity and Future Need
Building
Capacity
2017
Total Capacity
(Permanent/Portable)
2017
Forecast
Enrollment
2023
Needed
Capacity
2023
Elementary (K-5) 7,167 9,656 10,066 410
Middle (6-8) 2,457 3,331 4,780 1,449
High (9-12) 3,638 4,485 6,324 1,839
“Building Capacity” is the number of classrooms multiplied by the weighted average I-1351 class
size for non-high poverty schools, multiplied by a utilization factor to allow for planning time and
other uses.
“Forecast Enrollment 2023” is based on the enrollment forecast provided by MGT of America.
“Needed Capacity” does not include new capacity planned for completion through 2023 or
portable additions/relocations.
Page 31 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix A
Page 20 of 23
May 2018
Chart 5
Necessary Facility Improvements, Added Capacity and Costs
2018 Update
2017 BOND PROJECT ESTIMATES
New Elementary School #16 620 $27,300,000
New Elementary School #17 620 $28,500,000
Stevens Middle School
Replacement and Expansion 75 $42,700,000
New Middle School #4 920 $46,500,000
Land Acquisition 0 $2,000,000
Support Services Capital
Improvements 0 $3,000,000
Health and Safety Capital
Improvements 0 $1,700,000
Total 2017
Bond Project Estimates 2,235 $151,700,000
ESTIMATED PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS & CAPACITY
CONDITIONED ON FUTURE BOND AND STATE ASSISTANCE
New High School #3 1,800 $135,000,000
New Innovative High School TBD $38,000,000
Replace Livingston Elem. 200 $34,000,000
Replace McGee Elem. 200 $35,300,000
New Elementary School #18 600 $38,900,000
New Middle School #5 900 $56,800,000
Curie ES Expansion 80 $1,800,000
Land Acquisition (160 acres) 0 $12,160,000
Total Permanent Capacity 4,380 $351,960,000
TEMPORARY CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000
Total 460 $3,250,000
TOTALS 7,075 $506,910,000
Page 32 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix A
Page 21 of 23
May 2018
Chart 6
Capital Facilities Financing Plan
Project Estimates
“State Match” refers to funds allocated by the State of Washington through the School
Construction Assistance Program administered by OSPI. This number is an estimate of state
matching funds and is subject to verification by OSPI.
*The cost of bonds being used to finance the replacement of Stevens Middle School includes $3
million held over from 2013 bond which had been designated for Stevens Middle School
Improvements.
*The “portion TBD” of impact fee revenue used to fund the growth-related capacity projects
included in the 2017 Bond Projects will be determined based upon impact fee revenue received
from new development. Impact fee revenue may be able to offset debt service on the bonds
and result in tax savings to the existing community. In particular, the District plans to use at
least $2 million in school impact fees to reduce the cost of the 2017 Bond projects. These
estimates will be adjusted accordingly in future updates to this CFP.
Project
Added
Capacity
Est.
Cost
Source of Funding
Bonds State
Match
Impact/
Mitigation Fees
General
Fund
Approved November 2017 Bond Projects and Other Improvements
Elementary #16 620 $27,300,000 $18,700,000 $8,600,000 Portion TBD
Elementary #17 620 $28,500,000 $19,900,000 $8,600,000 Portion TBD
Stevens Middle School
Replacement
75 $42,700,000 $24,100,000* $18,600,000
Portion TBD
Middle School #4 920 $46,500,000 $37,800,000 $8,700,000 Portion TBD
Safety & Health
Improvements
$1,700,000 $1,700,000
Transportation &
Maintenance Improvements
$3,000,000 $3,000,000
Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000 Portion TBD
Land Acquisition $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Portion TBD
Future Bond Projects (Subject to Future Planning & Board Approval)
New High School #3 1,800 $135,000,000 $80,000,000 $50,000,000 Portion TBD
New Innovative High School TBD $38,000,000 $23,900,000 $14,100,000
Replace Livingston Elem. 200 $34,000,000 $13,600,000 $20,400,000 Portion TBD
Replace McGee Elem. 200 $35,300,000 $14,100,000 $21,200,000 Portion TBD
Parent Partnership Program TBD $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Portion TBD
New Elementary School #18 600 $38,900,000 $38,900,000 Portion TBD
New Middle School #5 900 $56,800,000 $56,800,000 Portion TBD
Curie ES Expansion 80 $1,800,000 1,800,000 Portion TBD
Land Acquisition NA $12,160,000 Portion TBD
Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000 Portion TBD
Page 33 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix B, Page 22 of 23
May 2018
APPENDIX B
IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Page 34 of 161
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Appendix B, Page 23 of 23
May 2018
Page 35 of 161
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO INCORPORATING
THE PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT’S 2018 UPDATE OF THE CAPITAL FACILITES PLAN INTO THE
CITY OF PASCO COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is required by State law to determine that adequate provisions are
made in each subdivision, short plat, and other division of property used for residential purposes, including
the adequacy of schools and playgrounds; and
WHEREAS, the Pasco School District No. 1 by letter of January 11, 2011, placed the City on
notice that due to escalating student population, it is unable to accommodate additional students that are
incident to new developments of residential housing and has by Resolution No. 809 adopted its Pasco
School District Capital Facilities Plan demonstrating the need for additional classrooms to meet the
anticipated demand of students residing within the new development areas of the City; and
WHEREAS, in February 2012 the City amended the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of Pasco by
incorporating the Pasco School District’s 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan into it; and
WHEREAS, in March 2012 the City adopted School Impact Fees through Ordinance 4046
reflective of the cost per student for new facilities as described in the District’s 2011-2017 Capital Facilities
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Pasco School District have adopted an Interlocal Agreement that
requires the District to submit an update of the Capital Facilities Plan every two years; and
WHEREAS, the Interlocal Agreement requires the City to consider the update of the District’s
Capital Facility Plan and if appropriate, incorporate the update into the City’s Comprehensive Land Use
Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the revised information contained in the 2018 update of the
District’s Capital Facilities Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after due consideration of the District’s request that the City
continue to collect School Impact Fees as calculated by the 2011-2017 School District Capital Facilities
Plan and as approved by Ordinance 4046; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
Incorporates the 2018 Update of the Pasco School District’s Capital Facilities Plan into the City
of Pasco Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this ___ day of ______________, 2019.
________________________
Matt Watkins, Mayor
Page 36 of 161
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ _____________________________
Angela Pashon, Interim City Clerk Kerr Ferguson Law Group
Page 37 of 161
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 3, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Presentation - WWTP Facility Plan Update
I. REFERENCE(S):
Draft Executive Summary of WWTP Facility Plan
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) provides physical and
biological treatment of the collected incoming wastewater prior to discharge of
disinfected water to the Columbia River. The facility operates under NPDES
Permit WA-004496-2, which regulates discharge to Columbia River and is
administered by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology).
The WWTP is located in the southeast region of the City. The facility was originally
constructed in 1954 and has undergone a series of major and minor upgrades in the
1970s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010s to provide for additional capacity, application of new
technology and replacement of some components having reached the end of useful life.
The City’s current population is approximately 75,000 resulting in approximately 5.4
million gallons of wastewater per day being treated at the WWTP.
.
Page 38 of 161
V. DISCUSSION:
As an Ecology-permitted facility approaches capacity (85%), a Facility Plan is required
to determine future expansion needs. Further, approval by Ecology of a Facility Plan is
a prerequisite to any improvement that would increase capacity or alter treatment
processes at the facility.
MurraySmith, an engineering consulting firm, has assisted staff in preparing the draft
WWTP Facility Plan. The Plan was submitted to Ecology for their review in April
2019. The City has already received comments back from Ecology on the plan which
are being addressed. Approval of the plan is anticipated in the very near future.
The WWTP Facility Plan was developed in conformance with Chapter 173-240
Washington Administrative Code (WAC). The Plan assesses the current capacity and
condition of the facility. In addition, projected flows and loadings were developed for
the twenty horizon based on population, industrial, and commercial growth as
projected by the City's Comprehensive Land Use planning efforts. Based on the
aforementioned projections, loading to the WWTP is expected to approximately double
by the 2040 planning horizon.
The plan confirms that most of the major infrastructure components at the WWTP are
at or approaching the end of useful life. Further, that several of those components are
at or approaching maximum capacity along with other system deficiencies, such as the
need for redundant systems which were not a requirement at the time the plant was
constructed or during subsequent major upgrades. Accordingly, the plan recommends
a series of projects to maintain reliable treatment entailing the replacement of
numerous major components that have reached end of life, and to enhance their
replacement to provide for increased capacity and treatment capabilities to adequately
treat the 2040 projected flow and loading. The proposed improvements to the WWTP
are based on a detailed evaluation of feasible alternatives, with recommendations for
improvements that are cost-effective solutions for both near and long-term needs.
The cost of these improvements is on the order of $70 million over the 20 year horizon
much of which will be funded through a series of revenue bonds over the next two
decades supported by rates. The majority of these costs would be required with or
without increases in future loading to the WWTP as current and past users have
appropriately worn out the WWTP over the years. However, to maintain equity, it will
be imperative that new connections continue to pay their proportional share of the cost
to buy into the system and make room (capacity) for their impact.
A draft executive summary of the plan is included in this packet. The Executive
Summary provides more detailed information on the findings, analysis and proposed
20-year improvement plan.
Craig Anderson, PE Principal Engineer with MurraySmith will present the update on
Page 39 of 161
the WWTP Facility plan supplemented by staff. Aside from the Facility Plan,
MurraySmith is also assisting in the preparation of the Comprehensive Plan update so
there is excellent linkage between the two efforts.
Page 40 of 161
DRAFT
16-1916 Page ES-1 Facility Plan
April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco
Executive Summary
Purpose
This Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Facility Plan has been developed to be in conformance
with Chapter 173-240 Washington Administrative Code (WAC) involving the Submission of Plans
and Reports for Construction of Wastewater Facilities and Table G1-1 of the Washington
Department of Ecology (Ecology) “Criteria for Sewage Works Design.” This Plan will enable the City
of Pasco (City) to improve WWTP unit processes and operations, and continue to meet effluent
quality requirements. This Plan includes the recommended modifications to the City’s WWTP for
the next 20 years that are based on a detailed evaluation of feasible alternatives, with
recommendations for improvements that are found to be cost-effective solutions to both the
City’s near and long-term needs.
Discharge Permit
The Federal Clean Water Act requires municipal facilities that discharge treated wastewater into
waters of the United States to obtain a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit. The permit establishes maximum pollutant concentrations and loads allowed in the
effluent discharge stream. The Pasco WWTP operates under NPDES Permit WA-004496-2, which
allows discharge of treated wastewater to the Columbia River. This permit was issued June 29,
2010 and was scheduled to end on June 30, 2015 but has been administratively extended while
the Department of Ecology works on drafting the next permit. The projected wastewater flow
growth in Pasco requires compliance with antidegradation standards. Based upon the results of a
Tier II Antidegradation analysis and discussions with Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology)
Staff, the new discharge permit is expected to be issued in 2019/20 and remain largely unchanged.
Therefore, all analysis in this document is based upon the 2010 permit requirements.
It should be noted that statewide trending for discharge permits includes various levels of water
quality and source control testing beyond what existing permit holders have experienced in the
past. The City should review its pretreatment program and source control programs with an eye
towards reducing the compliance effort to meet future discharge limits for toxics. While the permit
conditions that will result from current rulemaking efforts are far from clear, the evidence points
toward more stringent standards. Involvement with the rulemaking process will help the City
achieve compliance flexibility and reasonable compliance schedules for any required
pretreatment program, source control program, or WWTP facility changes that may become
necessary in the future.
Page 41 of 161
DRAFT
16-1916 Page ES-2 Facility Plan
April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco
WWTP Evaluation
The City WWTP provides physical and biological treatment of the collected incoming wastewater
prior to discharge of disinfected water to the Columbia River. The WWTP is located in the
southeast region of the City. The facility was originally constructed in 1954 and was subsequently
upgraded in the 1970s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010s. This 27.5 acre facility is the City’s municipal
WWTP. An industrial wastewater treatment plant treats industrial wastewater in the north part of
the City. An aerial image of the WWTP facility, with major unit processes, is shown in Figure ES-1.
The City’s current population is 71,934 (2016) and results in approximately 5.4 million gallons of
wastewater per day being treated at the WWTP. Population, flow and load projections were also
developed for this Plan and are expected to approximately double by the 2040 planning horizon.
The City has been one of the fastest growing cities in the State of Washington and nation over the
last several years.
The City has an excellent track record of meeting WWTP permit requirements. However, the
capacity analysis of the WWTP identified portions of the WWTP that are currently at, or nearly at,
capacity. With the additional flow projected to come to the WWTP, the majority of the WWTP will
reach capacity limits during the planning horizon. These include aeration basins, the aeration
system, secondary clarifiers, river outfall, dissolved air floatation thickening, anaerobic digestion,
rotary drum thickener, drying beds and influent screens.
Alternatives Evaluation and Selected Improvements
Multiple alternatives to address the noted deficiencies were developed during workshops and site
visits with City Staff.
Alternatives considered for the liquid and biosolids streams at the WWTP are presented in Tables
ES-1 and ES-2, respectively.
Page 42 of 161
DRAFT
16-1916 Page ES-3 Facility Plan
April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco
Figure ES-1
WWTP Site
Page 43 of 161
DRAFT
16-1916 Page ES-4 Facility Plan
April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco
Table ES-1
Liquid Treatment Alternatives
Alternative
Number Alternative Name Alternative Description Deficiency Addressed
PRE-1 Screening No Action Continued use of existing screens None
PRE-2 Expand Screening Expand headworks and with fourth perforated plate screen Screen
SEC-1 Secondary Treatment No
Action
Continued use of existing aeration basins None
SEC-2 Activated Sludge - Plug
Flow
Activated sludge with aeration basins with greater than 4:1 aspect
ratio and/or multiple baffled stages
Secondary Treatment - Aeration
Basin, Aeration System
SEC-3 Membrane Bioreactor
(MBR)
Aeration basin with internal semipermeable membranes that are
used to separate mixed liquor from treated effluent
Aeration Basin
Secondary Clarifier
SEC-4 Internal Fixed Film
Activated Sludge (IFAS) –
Fixed Growth
Conventional activated sludge type basin with addition of suspended
plastic media with biological growth to generate a higher total
microbiological mass.
Secondary Treatment - Aeration
Basin, Aeration System
SEC-5 Zee lung membrane
aeration bioreactor –
Fixed Growth
Conventional activated sludge type basin with submerged gas
permeable membranes that support fixed film growth
Secondary Treatment - Aeration
Basin, Aeration System
SEC-6 Trickling Filter/Activated
Sludge
Plant flow treated over fixed film based trickling filter followed by
conventional activated sludge
Secondary Treatment - Aeration
Basin, Aeration System
SEC-7 BioMag Activated Sludge Ballasted activated sludge Secondary Treatment - Aeration
Basin, Aeration System
SC-1 Secondary Clarifier No
Action
Continued use of existing secondary clarifiers None
SC-2 Secondary Clarifier 3 and
4
Expand secondary sedimentation with Secondary Clarifier 3 and 4-
Gravity separation in quiescent tank
Secondary Clarifier
DIS-1 UV Disinfection No Action Continued use of existing UV system None
DIS-2 UV Disinfection Expansion Expand UV system Disinfection
OUT-1 Outfall No Action Continued use of existing gravity outfall None
OUT-2 Gravity Outfall Effluent discharge through gravity pipeline and diffuser Outfall Page 44 of 161
DRAFT
16-1916 Page ES-5 Facility Plan
April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco
Table ES-2
Biosolids Handling Alternatives
Alternative
Number
Alternative
Name Alternative Description Deficiency
Addressed
WAS-1 WAS Thickening
No Action
Continued use of single
Dissolved Air Flotation Thickener (DAFT) None
WAS-2 Mechanical
Thickening
Thickening of waste activated sludge through
mechanical process prior to stabilization. DAFT
STA-1
Anaerobic
Digestion No
Action
Continued use of two anaerobic digesters None
STA-2
Anaerobic
Digestion
Expansion
Anaerobic digestion system to stabilize biosolids. Anaerobic
Digester
STA-3 Chemical
Hydrolysis
Breakdown of sludge into smaller chemical
compounds prior to stabilization process.
Anaerobic
Digester
STA-4 WAS Only
Thermal Drying
Drying WAS biosolids through application of heat
to dry through evaporation of water. Other
treatment of primary sludge biosolids will still be
required.
Anaerobic
Digester
FIN-1
Biosolids
Finishing No
Action
Continued use of single RDT and drying beds None
FIN-2 Mechanical
Dewatering
Mechanically dewater stabilized sludge to remove
water and produce a "cake".
Rotary Drum
Thickener
Drying Beds
General Note:
RDT= rotary drum thickener
Capital Improvement Program
The alternatives presented above were reviewed by the City and project team to determine which
provided the required treatment capacity, were most cost effective, maintain reliable operation,
and satisfy known permit conditions. The preferred improvements were developed into the
WWTP Capital Improvement Program and the projects were prioritized and spread out over the
next 20 years. Table ES-3 lists the proposed project timeframe for implementing each identified
improvement, and Figure ES-2 graphically illustrates the proposed project timeframe.
Page 45 of 161
DRAFT
16-1916 Page ES-6 Facility Plan
April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco
Table ES-3
List of Recommended Improvement Projects
Project
Number Project Name 2019-2022 2023-2026 2027-2033 2034-2040
1 Project 1 $24,073,000 - - -
1A 1A Outfall Study $175,000 - - -
1B 1B Secondary Treatment
Project 1 $9,264,000 - - -
1C 1C Outfall Project 1 $1,637,000 - - -
1D 1D Mechanical Dewatering $8,653,000 - - -
1E 1E Mechanical Thickening $4,344,000 - - -
2 Project 2 - $17,664,000 - -
2A 2A Secondary Treatment
Project 2 - $9,950,000 - -
2B 2B Outfall Project 2 - $4,898,000 - -
2C 2C UV Expansion Project - $2,816,000 - -
3 WWTP Facility Plan - - $400,000 -
4 Secondary Treatment Project 3 - - $5,162,000 -
5 Secondary Treatment Project 4 - - $10,953,000 -
6 Anaerobic Digestion Expansion - - $8,138,000 -
7 Administration Building - - - $5,076,000
8 Laboratory Building - - - $1,539,000
9 Headworks Expansion - - - $3,269,000
TOTAL $24,073,000 $17,664,000 $24,653,000 $9,884,000
Page 46 of 161
DRAFT
16-1916 Page ES-7 Facility Plan
April 2019 Executive Summary City of Pasco
Figure ES-2
Recommended Projects Phasing
Effect of Capital Improvement Plan Implementation
By implementing the recommended WWTP improvements in a timely manner, and as included in
this Facility Plan, the City can ensure:
▪ The ability to handle wastewater generated within the collection system service area
▪ Compliance with discharge permit requirements for multiple constituents
▪ Protection of water quality in the Columbia River
▪ The ability to handle the projected biosolids generated at the WWTP
Ultimately, by following the recommendations in this Plan, the City will serve its sewer customers,
the general public and the environment for years to come while avoiding regulatory enforcement
actions and fines.
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000
20192020202120222023202420252026202720282029203020312032203320342035203620372038203920401A - Outfall Study
1B - Secondary Treatment
Project 1
1C - Outfall Project 1
1D - Mechanical Dewatering
1E - Mechanical WAS
Thickening
2A - Secondary Treatment
Project 2
2B - Outfall Project 2
2C - UV Expansion Project
3 - WWTP Facility Plan
4 - Secondary Treatment
Project 3
5 - Secondary Treatment
Project 4
Note: Engineering design designated
with hatched pattern (e.g. )
Page 47 of 161
Pasco City Council MeetingJune 10, 2019Page 48 of 161
City of Pasco2019 WWTP Facility PlanCity Council SummaryPresented by: Craig AndersonJune 10, 2019Page 49 of 161
1. Existing WWTP ‐Layout‐Function2. Planning Period Impacts‐Age‐Growth/Capacity3. Recommended Solutions‐Selection Process‐Final CIPPRESENTATION OVERVIEWPage 50 of 161
1. Existing WWTP ‐Layout‐Function2. Planning Period Impacts‐Age‐Growth/Capacity3. Recommended Solutions‐Selection Process‐Final CIPPRESENTATION OVERVIEWPage 51 of 161
Pasco’s WWTPPage 52 of 161
Pasco’s WWTPPage 53 of 161
Primary TreatmentPage 54 of 161
Secondary TreatmentPage 55 of 161
DisinfectionPage 56 of 161
Liquid Disposal/ReusePage 57 of 161
Solids TreatmentPage 58 of 161
Solids Disposal/ReusePage 59 of 161
1. Existing WWTP ‐Layout‐Function2. Planning Period Impacts‐Age‐Growth/Capacity3. Recommended Solutions‐Selection Process‐Final CIPPRESENTATION OVERVIEWPage 60 of 161
WWTP Age and HistoryPage 61 of 161
WWTP Flow GrowthCurrent‐5.9 MGD average annual‐6.5 MGD maximum monthYear 2040‐9.8 MGD average annual‐10.8 MGD maximum monthPage 62 of 161
Planning Horizon DeficienciesPage 63 of 161
1. Existing WWTP ‐Layout‐Function2. Planning Period Impacts‐Age‐Growth/Capacity3. Recommended Solutions‐Selection Process‐Final CIPPRESENTATION OVERVIEWPage 64 of 161
Planning Horizon DeficienciesPage 65 of 161
Selected WWTP PathPage 66 of 161
Overall Project CostProject NumberProject NameProject Cost1Project 1$24,073,000 1A Outfall Study1B Secondary Treatment Project 11C Outfall Project 11D Mechanical Dewatering1E Mechanical Thickening2Project 2$17,664,000 2A Secondary Treatment Project 22B Outfall Project 22C UV Expansion Project3 WWTP Facility Plan$400,000 4 Secondary Treatment Project 3$5,162,000 5 Secondary Treatment Project 4$10,953,000 6 Anaerobic Digestion Expansion$8,138,000 7 Administration Building$5,076,000 8 Laboratory Building$1,539,000 9 Headworks Expansion$3,269,000 TOTAL$76,274,000 Page 67 of 161
Project Cost Timeline (CIP)Page 68 of 161
Additional Future WorkDraft Facility PlanPublic Notice & PresentationSEPA, SERPFinal Facility PlanQuestionsPage 69 of 161
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 14, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: 2020-2025 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan
I. REFERENCE(S):
2020-2025 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project Map
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Sixtheir update to annually Washington are counties and cities required -Year
Transportation Improvement Programs (TIP). Update of the TIP is necessary to qualify
for federal and state funding. In addition, the updated includes small and large projects
varying from street overlays, street widening, intersection improvements, to ADA
improvements to pedestrian facilities to mega projects like the Lewis Street Overpass.
These projects are included in the project list and are depicted on the project map. The
TIP is a transportation system planning document and is not fiscally constrained,
meaning, many of the projects on the list lack a secure source of funding.
As a planning document, the proposed TIP update represents those projects that are
anticipated to be needed within six years. Projects are often strategically coordinated
with large utility projects, or may be delayed due to a lack of funding, and in some
cases impacted positively or negatively by other agencies having an interest in a
project; such as WSDOT, as a result timing of projects within the TIP will often and
necessarily require adjustment.
Page 70 of 161
Update of the TIP and subsequent submission to the State are statutory requirements,
and while our local program is not required to be fiscally constrained, the program
should be reasonable and realistic. The Council will see most of these projects again,
incorporated with the annual Six-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the annual
budgeting process, both of which are much more fiscally constrained than the TIP.
V. DISCUSSION:
The Plan is being presented to Council for questions and discussion. Upon Council
review and direction, the plan will be modified and staff will prepare a resolution
adopting the plan and present the TIP to the public in the form of a public hearing on
June 17, 2019.
The program will be submitted to the State after the public hearing.
Page 71 of 161
June 10, 2019
Page 72 of 161
Page 73 of 161
Page 74 of 161
Page 75 of 161
Page 76 of 161
Page 77 of 161
Questions?Page 78 of 161
Proj. #Project Name
# on
Map Road Name Begin & End Termini PE ROW Construction Total Project Cost
Ongoing
Project
Funding
Secured?2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
n/a -Annual Pavement Preservation Program 1 various various $ 252,000 $ - $ 5,246,148 $ 5,498,148 YES YES $ 850,000 $ 875,500 $ 901,765 $ 928,818 $ 956,682 $ 985,383
13007 -Lewis Street Overpass 2 Lewis Street Oregon Avenue to 2nd
Avenue $ 3,565,000 $ 4,080,000 $ 24,371,000 $ 32,016,000 YES PARTIAL $ 18,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 2,371,000
n/a -Lewis Street Corridor Improvements 3 Lewis Street 5th Avenue to 2nd
Avenue $ 125,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,625,000 YES PARTIAL $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 500,000
16014 -Citywide Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades - Phase 2 4 Multiple
Locations Multiple Locations $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,300,000 YES YES $ 3,000,000
13005 -Road 68 and Burden Road Intersection/channelization Improvements 5 Road 68 Chapel Hill Blvd to
Sandifur Parkway $ 55,000 $ - $ 205,000 $ 260,000 NEW YES $ 260,000
15009 -Wrigley Drive Extension 6 Wrigley Drive Clemente Lane to
Convention Drive $ 18,000 $ 16,000 $ 276,000 $ 310,000 YES YES $ 276,000
n/a -Road 68 Widening - South of Interstate 182 - Phase 1 7 Road 68 Interstate 182 to Argent
Road $ 57,628 $ 250,000 $ 307,628 NO YES $ 250,000
12001 -Argent Road Improvements - Phase 1 8 Argent Road Varney/Saraceno to
20th Avenue $ 415,000 $ - $ 1,600,000 $ 2,015,000 YES YES $ 1,600,000
12001 -Argent Road Improvements - Phase 2 9 Argent Road Road 36 to
Varney/Saraceno $ 715,000 $ - $ 3,000,000 $ 3,715,000 NO PARTIAL $ 300,000
n/a -Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 1 10 Burns Road Rd 100 to Rd 90 $ 12,000 $ - $ 108,000 $ 120,000 NEW NO $ 12,000 $ 108,000
n/a -Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 2 11 Burns Road Rd 90 to Rd 84 $ 8,000 $ - $ 63,000 $ 71,000 NEW NO $ 8,000 $ 63,000
n/a -Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 3 12 Burns Road Rd 84 to Rd 68 $ 11,000 $ - $ 91,000 $ 102,000 NEW NO $ 11,000 $ 91,000
n/a -Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 100 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership 13 Road 100 St. Thomas Drive to
Harris Rd $ 120,000 $ - $ 2,200,000 $ 2,320,000 NEW NO $ 120,000 $ 2,200,000
n/a -Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 68 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership 14 Road 68 Chapel Hill Blvd to
Burden Blvd $ 100,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 1,100,000 NEW NO $ 100,000 $ 1,000,000
n/a -Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street Overpass - WSDOT Partnership 15 Sylvester Street 32nd Avenue to 28th
Avenue $ 78,000 $ - $ - $ 78,000 NEW NO $ 78,000
n/a -Road 100 Widening - South of Interstate 182 16 Road 100 Court Street to Chapel
Hill $ 375,000 $ - $ 3,750,000 $ 4,125,000 NO NO $ 375,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,250,000
n/a -Sacajawea Heritage Trail/Levee Lowering 17 Sacajawea
Heritage Trail Road 72 to Road 52 $ 231,000 $ - $ 4,500,000 $ 4,731,000 NO NO $ 196,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,000,000
17001 -Sandifur Parkway Widening 18 Sandifur
Parkway Road 60 to Road 52 $ 25,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ 425,000 NO NO $ 25,000 $ 400,000
n/a -Court Street & Road 68 Intersection Improvements 19 Court Street Road 68 $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 735,000 $ 860,000 NEW NO $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 735,000
n/a -Road 44 and Argent Road Intersection Analysis 20 Road 44 and
Argent Road
Road 44 and Argent
Road $ 65,000 $ - $ - $ 65,000 NO NO $ 65,000
n/a -Traffic Analysis for Interstate 182 @ SR 395 Interchange 21 Interstate 182 MP 11 to MP 13 $ 265,000 $ - $ - $ 265,000 NO NO $ 265,000
n/a -Traffic Analysis for State Route 12 @ Tank Farm Road Interchange 22 State Route 12 State Route 12 and
Tank Farm Road $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000 NO NO $ 250,000
n/a -FCID Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway Study 23 None Road 100 to Road 76
FCID Canal Alignment $ 90,000 $ - $ 780,000 $ 870,000 YES NO $ 90,000 $ 360,000 $ 420,000
n/a -Crescent Road Surface Improvement 24 Crescent Road Broadmoor Apts to
Road 108 (1670 LF) $ 45,000 $ - $ 355,000 $ 400,000 NO NO $ 45,000 $ 355,000
n/a -Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 1 25 Sandifur
Parkway
Road 100 west to Road
to be named later $ 150,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,650,000 NEW NO $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000
n/a -Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 2 26 Sandifur
Parkway
Road to be named later
to Dent Road Extension $ 150,000 $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 1,650,000 NEW NO $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000
16010 -James Street Improvements 27 James Street Oregon Avenue to cul-
de-sac $ 48,000 $ - $ 435,000 $ 483,000 NO NO $ 48,000 $ 435,000
n/a -Road 76 Overpass 28 Road 76 Chapel Hill Blvd to
Burden Blvd $ 1,500,000 $ 500,000 $ 28,000,000 $ 30,000,000 NO NO $ 300,000
16017 -Transportation System Master Plan N/A Citywide various $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000 YES YES $ 200,000
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
25,207,000$ 8,524,500$ 6,700,765$ 4,584,818$ 6,477,682$ 5,690,383$
2020 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Page 79 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Annual Pavement Preservation Program
Citywide - Various 2020 Ongoing
The City has a pavement preservation program to assess the condition of roads and to determine if those roads would benefit from
preservation measures to repair and extend the life of the surface. Prioritization is based upon classification, condition, and determined
impact of expended funds to extend serviceability.
This amount also includes 50% of the monies slated for alley hard surfacing.
$ 4,500,000
OVERLAY (S)$ 4,500,000
TOTAL $ 4,500,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 750,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 0 $ 4,500,000
$ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000
$ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000
$ 750,000
Map # 1
Page 80 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
13007
2020 to 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Lewis Street Overpass
Oregon Avenue to 2nd Avenue 2020 Ongoing
One of the largest, regionally significant projects, for Pasco in the last 20 years. This project will replace the restrictive, deteriorating, and
inefficient underpass, built in 1937, with a new overpass between 2nd Avenue and Oregon Avenue.
This new overpass will be the gateway to downtown Pasco and will begin the design theme with Streetscape and decorative elements that
will ultimately bring new life to the Peanuts Park area which houses the well-known Pasco Farmers Market, now retitled el Mercado de
Pasco.
Improvements include concrete overpass, new roadway surface with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including potable water, irrigation
water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater will also be built.
$ 32,016,000
$ 7,082,005
City 120-Arterial (S)$ 2,756,281
CWA (S)$ 15,000,000
City 193-REET (S)$ 1,565,982
Fed Grant (S)$ 3,754,231
City 125 - I-82 (S)$ 12,252
Stormwater Part (S)$ 300,000
$ 3,565,000 $ 0 $ 3,565,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 4,080,000 $ 0 $ 4,080,000
$ 31,000 $ 24,340,000 $ 24,371,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 7,676,000 $ 18,000,000 $ 24,340,000 $ 0 $ 32,016,000
$ 4,000,000 $ 2,340,000
$ 4,000,000 $ 2,340,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
$ 18,000,000
Map # 2
Page 81 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Lewis Street Corridor Improvement
5th Avenue to 2nd Avenue 2020 Ongoing
The project is intended to tie the improvements made with the overpass project into those made under the Peanuts Park improvement
project. Taking into account the anticipated increase in pedestrian/bicycle traffic as well as the positive impact to businesses within this
corridor, this project is intended to enhance the accessibility to businesses and improve the safety and efficiency of the transportation
corridor.
$ 1,625,000
CDBG (S)$ 875,000
REET (U)$ 750,000
TOTAL $ 1,625,000
$ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 125,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 25,000 $ 550,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 0 $ 1,625,000
$ 50,000
$ 500,000 $ 500,000
$ 550,000 $ 500,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
$ 500,000
Map # 3
Page 82 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
16014
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Citywide Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades - Phase 2
Multiple Location 2019 Ongoing
The City’s signal controllers are out of date. This project continues where phase 1 left off to update the signal controllers, as well as the
interconnect equipment. The project will also improve the vehicle detection system, and emergency vehicle priority. Pedestrian access will
also be upgraded to meet current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines.
$ 3,300,000
FUND 120 (S)$ 435,000
STBG (S)$ 2,642,361
TAP (S)$ 146,891
FUND 125 (S)$ 158,000
TOTAL $ 3,300,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 300,000 $ 0 $ 300,000
$ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 0 $ 3,300,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0
$ 3,000,000
Map # 4
Page 83 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Road 68 and Burden Blvd Intersection/Channelization Improvements
Road 68 & Burden Blvd 2020 New
Often identified as Pasco’s most congested corridor this project, in conjunction with the Wrigley Drive Extension Project, is intended to
reduce traffic congestion, increase efficiency, and improve safety.
WSDOT is an important partner in identifying and prioritizing these projects as the first to address immediate concerns and make the
largest impact with the available funds.
This project will include signing, striping, and channelization considerations on Burden Boulevard and Road 68 to reduce stacking of
vehicles in the westbound lanes at the intersection.
$ 260,000
City 120 - Arterial (S)$ 35,100
STBG (S)$ 224,900
TOTAL $ 260,000
$ 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 55,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 205,000 $ 205,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 260,000 $ 260,000 $ 0 $ 260,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0
$ 205,000
Map # 5
Page 84 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
15009
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Wrigley Drive Extension
Clemente Lane to Convention Drive 2019 Ongoing
This project, identified by WSDOT as an important co-effort with the Road 68 and Burden Road Intersection/Channelization Improvements
Project, in addressing congestion, efficiency, and safety concerns associated with the Road 68 Corridor. This connection will provide
another alternative to residents for accessing Road 68 at a signalized intersection.
Although no frontage improvements are being considered as part of this effort, this project will provide a core-road that when adjacent
properties develop those additional improvements will be added. This improvement will provide an important connection to road 68 for area
residents and will relieve some of the demand placed upon the intersection of Road 68 and Burden Boulevard.
Improvements include new roadway surface without curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including potable water, irrigation water, and sanitary
sewer are also being extended.
$ 310,000
City 450-Sewer (S)$ 13,950
City 411-Water (S)$ 13,950
City 420-Irr (S)$ 13,950
STP(UL) (S)$ 268,150
TOTAL $ 310,000
$ 18,000 $ 0 $ 18,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 16,000 $ 0 $ 16,000
$ 276,000 $ 276,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 34,000 $ 276,000 $ 276,000 $ 0 $ 310,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0
$ 276,000
Map # 6
Page 85 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Road 68 Widening - South of I-182 - Phase 1
Rd 68 - I-182 2020 Pre-Existing
This project is intended to add width to the westerly side of Road 68 to better handle the increased Average Daily Traffic (ADT) numbers
due to continued development of the area. Although some of this will be developer driven there will still be remaining pieces that will need
city involvement for consistency.
Improvements include street widening with a new roadway surface along with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including stormwater may
also be built as part of the improvements.
$ 307,628
FUND 110 (S) $ 41,530
STBG (S)$ 266,098
TOTAL $ 307,628
$ 57,628 $ 0 $ 57,628
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 250,000 $ 250,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 57,628 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 307,628$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0
$ 250,000
Map # 7
Page 86 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
12001
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Argent Road Improvement, Phase 1
Argent Rd - Varney/Saraceno to 20th Ave 2020 Ongoing
This project was originally considered in its entirety from Road 36 to 20th Avenue. It also includes two important stakeholders in Columbia
Basin Community College (CBC) and The Port of Pasco (Port). Do to the immediate improvements necessary as part of the development
of the Port of Pasco’s property, namely the new hotel, it became necessary to break the project into two phases.
This project now includes two phases. Phase 1 includes improvements from Varney Lane/Saraceno Way to 20th Avenue while Phase 2
extends from road 36 to Varney Lane/Saraceno Way.
Improvements include street widening with a new roadway surface along with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including stormwater will
also be built as part of the improvements.
$ 1,600,000
$ 415,000
PORT OF PASCO (S)$ 800,000
CBC (S)$ 800,000
TOTAL $ 1,600,000
$ 415,000 $ 0 $ 415,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 415,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 1,600,000 $ 0 $ 2,015,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0
$ 1,600,000
Map # 8
Page 87 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
12001
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Argent Road Improvement, Phase 2
Argent Rd - Rd 36 to Varney/Saraceno 2025 Pre-Existing
This project was originally considered in its entirety from Road 36 to 20th Avenue. It also includes two important stakeholders in Columbia
Basin Community College (CBC) and The Port of Pasco (Port). Do to the immediate improvements necessary as part of the development
of the Port of Pasco’s property, namely the new hotel, it became necessary to break the project into two phases.
This project now includes two phases. Phase 1 includes improvements from Varney Lane/Saraceno Way to 20th Avenue while Phase 2
extends from road 36 to Varney Lane/Saraceno Way.
Improvements include street widening with a new roadway surface along with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including stormwater will
also be built as part of the improvements.
$ 3,300,000
$ 415,000
PORT (S)$ 100,000
CBC (S)$ 100,000
City (U)$ 100,000
TOTAL $ 300,000
$ 415,000 $ 300,000 $ 715,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 415,000 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 3,000,000 $ 3,715,000
$ 300,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 300,000
Map # 9
Page 88 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathways - Phase 1
Burns Rd - Rd 100 to Rd 90 2021 New
With the development of properties to the north of Burns Road and the associated improvement of the road itself what is missing is a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway on the south side of Burns Road to provide a safe connection to other residential communities but also for
children to effectively get to and from the new schools under design just north of Burns Road.
This 12’ wide asphalt pathway is similar to many other pedestrian/bicycle pathways in the city and will provide a safe and convenient way
for citizens to move within the area.
$ 120,000
REET (U)$ 30,000
SRTS (U)$ 90,000
TOTAL $ 120,000
$ 12,000 $ 12,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 108,000 $ 108,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 120,000 $ 0 $ 120,000
$ 12,000
$ 108,000
$ 12,000 $ 108,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 10
Page 89 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathways - Phase 2
Burns Rd - Rd 90 to Rd 84 2021 New
With the development of properties to the north of Burns Road and the associated improvement of the road itself what is missing is a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway on the south side of Burns Road to provide a safe connection to other residential communities but also for
children to effectively get to and from the new schools under design just north of Burns Road.
This 12’ wide asphalt pathway is similar to many other pedestrian/bicycle pathways in the city and will provide a safe and convenient way
for citizens to move within the area
$ 71,000
REET (U)$ 16,000
SRTS (U)$ 55,000
TOTAL $ 71,000
$ 8,000 $ 8,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 63,000 $ 63,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 71,000 $ 0 $ 71,000
$ 8,000
$ 63,000
$ 8,000 $ 0 $ 63,000 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 11
Page 90 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathways - Phase 3
Burns Rd - Rd 84 to Rd 68 2021 New
With the development of properties to the north of Burns Road and the associated improvement of the road itself what is missing is a
pedestrian/bicycle pathway on the south side of Burns Road to provide a safe connection to other residential communities but also for
children to effectively get to and from the new schools under design just north of Burns Road.
This 12’ wide asphalt pathway is similar to many other pedestrian/bicycle pathways in the city and will provide a safe and convenient way
for citizens to move within the area.
$ 102,000
REET (U)$ 25,500
SRTS (U)$ 76,500
TOTAL $ 102,000
$ 11,000 $ 11,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 91,000 $ 91,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 102,000 $ 0 $ 102,000
$ 11,000
$ 91,000
$ 11,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 91,000 $ 0
Map # 12
Page 91 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 100 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership
Rd 100 - St Thomas Dr to Harris Rd 2022 New
Along with the Complete Streets Ordinance that the City of Pasco applies to all transportation corridors presented for improvements within
the City the interchanges result in barriers to pedestrians and bicyclists wishing to traverse them. In an effort to provide better access to
pedestrians and bicyclists the City will work with WSDOT to either improve existing facilities, such as those already in place on Road 68 or
add improvements such as those identified for Road 100 Interchange.
Since pedestrian/bicycle facilities don’t currently exist at this location the City will work with WSDOT to add those. Initial discussions
indicate that the interchange bridge deck provides enough width to accommodate pedestrian/bicycle facilities. With that, the City is
proposing that the overpass be re-striped in a “first phase” with the ultimate project having enhanced facilities providing safe and
encouraging access.
$ 2,320,000
WSDOT (U)$ 470,000
TIF (U)$ 50,000
STBG (U)$ 1,500,000
ARTERIAL (U)$ 300,000
TOTAL $ 2,320,000
$ 120,000 $ 120,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 2,200,000 $ 2,200,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 2,320,000 $ 0 $ 2,320,000
$ 120,000
$ 2,200,000
$ 0 $ 120,000 $ 2,200,000 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 13
Page 92 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 68 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership
Rd 68 - Chapel Hill Blvd to Burden Blvd 2023 New
Along with the Complete Streets Ordinance that the City of Pasco applies to all transportation corridors presented for improvements within
the City the interchanges result in barriers to pedestrians and bicyclists wishing to traverse them. In an effort to provide better access to
pedestrians and bicyclists the City will work with WSDOT to either improve existing facilities, such as those already in place on Road 68 or
add improvements such as those identified for Road 100 Interchange.
Since pedestrian/bicycle facilities currently exist at this location the City will work with WSDOT to improve and enhance the access that
those facilities are intended to provide.
$ 1,100,000
WSDOT (U)$ 275,000
TIF (U)$ 25,000
STBG (U)$ 800,000
TOTAL $ 1,100,000
$ 100,000 $ 100,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 1,100,000 $ 0 $ 1,100,000
$ 100,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 100,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 0
Map # 14
Page 93 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester St Overpass - WSDOT Partnership
Sylvester St - 32nd Ave to 28th Ave 2021 New
Along with the Complete Streets Ordinance that the City of Pasco applies to all transportation corridors presented for improvements within
the City the interchanges and overpasses result in barriers to pedestrians and bicyclists wishing to traverse them. In an effort to provide
better access to pedestrians and bicyclists the City will work with WSDOT to either improve existing facilities access.
Since pedestrian/bicycle facilities don’t currently exist at this location the City will work with WSDOT to add those. Integral to the exterior
wall supporting the upper metal barrier exists a “stepped” or raised concrete section that interferes with the ability to provide a level
platform for pedestrians and/or bicyclists. The City proposes to work with WSDOT to undertake an evaluation to determine whether or not
that raised section can be eliminated or possibly extended to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists.
$ 78,000
WSDOT (U) $ 25,000
ARTERIAL (U)$ 25,000
TAP (U)$ 28,000
TOTAL $ 78,000
$ 78,000 $ 78,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 78,000 $ 0 $ 78,000
$ 78,000
$ 78,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 15
Page 94 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Road 100 Widening (South of I-182)
Court Street to Chapel Hill 2023 Pre-Existing
This project is intended to improve both deficiencies in Right-of-way and road surface width in areas that used to be within the County.
Road 100 is a major arterial providing citizens direct access to the interchange at Interstate 182. The extents of this project are Court Street
on the South and Chapel Hill Boulevard on the north.
Improvements include street widening with a new roadway surface along with curb/gutter and sidewalk. Utilities including stormwater will
also be built as part of the improvements.
$ 4,125,000
TIF (U)$ 500,000
City (U)$ 1,525,000
ARTERIAL (U)$ 2,000,000
TAP (U)$ 100,000
TOTAL $ 4,125,000
$ 375,000 $ 375,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 3,750,000 $ 3,750,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 4,125,000 $ 0 $ 4,125,000
$ 375,000
$ 1,500,000 $ 2,250,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 375,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 2,250,000
Map # 16
Page 95 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Sacajawea Heritage Trail Levee Lowering
Sacajawea Heritage Trail - Rd 72 to Rd 52 2020 Pre-Existing
This project will lower the existing levee height to reflect the actual height necessary to provide protection to those properties bounded by
its extents.
The lowering will provide the opportunity to rebuild the pedestrian/bicycle pathway and provide additional width, outside that paved, for
added safety to users than currently exists. This pathway will connect the Sacajawea Heritage Trail from Road 72 to Road 52.
$ 4,696,000
$ 35,000
RCO (U)$ 3,650,000
REET (U)$ 1,081,000
TOTAL $ 4,731,000
$ 35,000 $ 196,000 $ 196,000 $ 231,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 4,500,000 $ 4,500,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 35,000 $ 196,000 $ 4,696,000 $ 0 $ 4,731,000
$ 2,500,000 $ 2,000,000
$ 2,500,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 17
Page 96 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
2020 to 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Sandifur Parkway Widening
Road 60 to Road 52 2020 Pre-Existing
This project will add the necessary asphalt pavement width, approximately 15', to Sandifur Parkway from Road 52 to Road 60.
This improvement will complete the "core road" section providing safe and consistent lanes widths.
$ 425,000
CITY (U)$ 125,000
OVERLAY (U)$ 300,000
TOTAL $ 425,000
$ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 400,000 $ 400,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 25,000 $ 425,000 $ 0 $ 425,000
$ 400,000
$ 400,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 18
Page 97 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Court St & Road 68 Intersection Improvements
Court St & Road 68 2022 New
This project will consist of the design and construction of intersection control measures. This intersection has proven to be unsafe and in
need of improvement due to an increase in the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) demands associated with the development in the area that has
added additional vehicles to this intersection.
$ 860,000
TIF (U)$ 25,000
ARTERIAL (U)$ 100,000
TIB (U)$ 735,000
TOTAL $ 860,000
$ 75,000 $ 75,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 50,000 $ 50,000
$ 735,000 $ 735,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 860,000 $ 0 $ 860,000
$ 75,000
$ 50,000
$ 735,000
$ 0 $ 75,000 $ 50,000 $ 735,000 $ 0
Map # 19
Page 98 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Road 44 aand Argent Rd Intersection Improvements - Partnership with County
Road 44 & Argent Rd 2024 Pre-Existing
Connecting a heavily populated residential area of the City with an arterial street, Argent Road, this intersection continues to receive a large
volume of traffic with concerns of the level of service falling below allowable limits.
The City will undertake an evaluation, with Franklin County, to determine the best course of action, if any, to ensure that the intersection
continues to perform at an acceptable level.
$ 65,000
TIF (U)$ 10,000
CITY (U)$ 15,000
HSIP (U)$ 40,000
TOTAL $ 65,000
$ 65,000 $ 65,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 0 $ 65,000
$ 65,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 65,000 $ 0
Map # 20
Page 99 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Traffic Analysis for I-182 @ US 395 Interchange
I-182 MP 11 - MP13 2022 Pre-Existing
As a continuing effort associated with the Interstate 182 interchange feasibility study done recently by the City of Pasco this effort will
further study the connectivity of this critical interchange to determine if improvements can be made to improve efficiency, provide better
connectivity for motorists taking pressure off of other areas of the City transportation network.
$ 265,000
TIF (U)$ 60,000
CITY (U)$ 165,000
HSIP (U)$ 40,000
TOTAL $ 265,000
$ 265,000 $ 265,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 265,000 $ 0 $ 265,000
$ 265,000
$ 0 $ 265,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 21
Page 100 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Traffic Analysis for SR 12 @ Tank Farm Road Interchange
SR 12 & Tank Farm Road 2023 Pre-Existing
Identified as a possible interchange improvement by WSDOT this location serves a large potential industrial area that the City of Pasco has
already invested money. This analysis, in conjunction with WSDOT and Federal Highways, would provide the information to better prepare
a strategic plan in addressing transportation connectivity with State Route 12 in this area.
$ 250,000
TIF (U)$ 60,000
CITY (U)$ 160,000
HSIP (U)$ 30,000
TOTAL $ 250,000
$ 250,000 $ 250,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 250,000
$ 250,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 250,000 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 22
Page 101 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
FCID Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway Study
Rd 100 to Rd 76 (FCID Canal Alignment)2020 Ongoing
This project, originally identified in the 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan as FCID Trail – Phase 2, will be further evaluated with new
information as to ownership of the property. As a part of that evaluation the City will endeavor to coordinate with multiple stakeholders to
create a plane to secure and build a 12’ wide pedestrian/bicycle asphalt pathway further extending and connecting those pathways through
and around the City of Pasco.
$ 870,000
RCO (U)$ 585,000
REET (U)$ 285,000
TOTAL $ 870,000
$ 90,000 $ 90,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 780,000 $ 780,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 870,000 $ 0 $ 870,000
$ 90,000
$ 360,000 $ 420,000
$ 90,000 $ 360,000 $ 420,000 $ 0 $ 0
Map # 23
Page 102 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Crescent Road Surface Improvements
Broadmoor Apts to Road 108 (1670 LF)2024 Pre-Existing
This project is intended to design and construct an asphalt road from Road 108 to Chapel Hill Boulevard. The existing roadway does not
make connection to Chapel Hill Boulevard in its present extents. Although no frontage improvements are being considered as part of this
effort, this project will provide a core-road that when adjacent properties develop those additional improvements will be added. This
improvement will provide an important connection to road 100 for area residents and will relieve some of the demand placed upon the
southern end of Road 100.
$ 400,000
CITY (U)$ 100,000
DEVELOPER (U)$ 300,000
TOTAL $ 400,000
$ 45,000 $ 45,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 355,000 $ 355,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 400,000 $ 0 $ 400,000
$ 45,000
$ 355,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 45,000 $ 355,000
Map # 24
Page 103 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 to 2025
PW/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 1
Road 100 west to Road to be named (2,800')2023 New
This project extends Sandifur Parkway from Road 100 to the east approximately 2800’ to a future north-south road (Name TBD). This
north-south roadway encompasses the trunk sewer main.
This project would include new asphalt roadway surface, curb/gutter, and sidewalks consistent with Sandifur Parkway as it exists on the
west side of Road 100. This project would also modify the current connection of Harris Road into Road 100, as well as its potential
alignment change to address a future NW loop ramp for the interchange improvement as originally identified in the 2017 feasibility for
Traffic Study for Interchanges. Although this alignment and connection change would be made development is anticipated to finish the
necessary frontage improvements.
$ 1,650,000
CITY (U)$ 150,000
DEVELOPER (U)$ 1,500,000
TOTAL $ 1,650,000
$ 150,000 $ 150,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 1,650,000 $ 0 $ 1,650,000
$ 150,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000 $ 0
Map # 25
Page 104 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 to 2025
PW/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 2
Road to be named to Dent Road (2,800')2024 New
This project continues the extension of Sandifur Parkway with a connection to the Pahlisch Homes development. This project would include
new asphalt roadway surface, curb/gutter, and sidewalks consistent with Sandifur Parkway Phase 1.
$ 1,650,000
CITY (U)$ 150,000
DEVELOPER (U)$ 1,500,000
TOTAL $ 1,650,000
$ 150,000 $ 150,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 1,500,000 $ 1,500,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 1,650,000 $ 0 $ 1,650,000
$ 150,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 150,000 $ 1,500,000
Map # 26
Page 105 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
16010
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
James Street Improvements
Oregon Avenue to Cul-De-Sac 2023 Pre-Existing
This project is intended to provide a safe and consistent roadway to many of Pasco’s heavy machinery and agricultural/industrial oriented
businesses.
James street has evolved over time as different business located along its sides into what is now a hodgepodge of intermingled access
points, utility risers, and poorly lit travel ways. This area deserves to be a focal point representing the pride that Pasco has for services
offered by these businesses for the economic vitality of the region.
This project will redefine the heavily used roadway by providing a new heavy duty roadway section, curb/gutter and pedestrian
considerations along with r/w improvements that will not only beautify but enhance accessibility and safety for the traveling public and the
businesses within this corridor, now and in the future.
$ 483,000
LID $ 483,000
TOTAL $ 483,000
$ 48,000 $ 48,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 435,000 $ 435,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 483,000 $ 0 $ 483,000
$ 48,000
$ 435,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 48,000 $ 435,000 $ 0
Map # 27
Page 106 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
N/A
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Road 76 Overpass
Chapel Hill to Burden Blvd 2025 Pre-Existing
An overpass was suggested as part of the DNR property improvements. That area is defined as south of Interstate 182, east of Road 84
and west of Road 68. This overpass would help to take the pressure off of the interchange at Road 68 by providing another access route to
the popular businesses along Road 68.
The initial money allocated are to analyze the effectiveness of the overpass and provide a feasibility plan for its construction.
$ 30,000,000
CITY (U)$ 300,000
TOTAL $ 300,000
$ 300,000 $ 1,200,000 $ 1,500,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 500,000 $ 500,000
$ 0 $ 28,000,000 $ 28,000,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0 $ 300,000 $ 29,700,000 $ 30,000,000
$ 300,000
$ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 300,000
Map # 28
Page 107 of 161
PROJECT
TITLE
PROJECT
LOCATION
7RWDOBudget
([SHQGLWXUHV
CAPITAL
COSTS
Prior
Year(s)2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
2020-2025
TOTAL
Future
Year(s)Total
<HDU
Planning/Design/
Engineering
In-House
Professional Svcs.
Land Acquisition
Construction
Comp. Hardware/
Software
Equipment
Other Services
Total
$17,&,3$7('METHOD
OF FINANCING ($)
(S)= Secured
(U)= Unsecured
DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
PROJECT STATUS
Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
City of Pasco
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Project #
Department/Division
Department Contact
PROJECT START
352-(&767$786 ($)
%XGJHWDQG([SHQGLWXUHV
16017
2020 TO 2025
Public Works/Engineering
Daniel S. Ford
Transportation System Master Plan
Citywide 2019 Ongoing
A critical tool that the City of Pasco can utilize as it continues to address its unprecedented growth and provide an acceptable level of
service to the Citizens of Pasco. The plan will outline policies and projects, analyze current and projects transportation conditions, create a
plan of what transportation system might look like for the next 20 years, reflects community values and council goals, supports proposed
land development patterns, attempts to balance the needs of the motorized public including freight and multimodal transportation
considerations as well as provides a financial plan in effectively addressing the transportation needs of the City.
$ 300,000
FUND 110 (S)$ 300,000
TOTAL $ 300,000
$ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 300,000
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 0 $ 0
$ 100,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 0 $ 300,000$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ 0
Map # n/a
Page 108 of 161
ROAD 44BURDEN BLVD.
I-18
2
ARGENT
COURT STREET
SYLVESTER STREET
WRIGLEY ROAD 68CITY LIMITS
SANDIFUR
CITY LIMITS
A STREET
LEWIS ST
AIN
S
W
O
R
T
H
SR-
3
9
7OREGON AVE.SR-397BNSF RR4TH AVE.20TH AVE.ARGENT BNSF RRHILLSBORO COMMERCIALST. HELENS
KAH
L
O
T
U
S
HI
G
H
W
A
Y
S
R
-
1
2
C
I
T
Y
L
IM
I
T
SSR-395CAPITALCITY LIMITS
FOSTER WELLS RD
ROAD 100YEAR 2020-2025
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CITY OF PASCO
Projects
N/A Annual Pavement Preservation Program
2 Lewis Street Overpass
3 Lewis Street Corridor Improvements
4 Citywide Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades - Phase 2
5 Road 68 and Burden Road Intersection/channelization Improvements
6 Wrigley Drive Extension
7 Road 68 Widening - South of Interstate 182 - Phase 1
8 Argent Road Improvements - Phase 1
9 Argent Road Improvements - Phase 2
10 Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 1
11 Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 2
12 Burns Road Pedestrian/Bicycle Pathway - Phase 3
13 Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 100 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership
14 Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Road 68 Interchange - WSDOT Partnership
15 Pedestrian/Bicycle Access Sylvester Street Overpass - WSDOT Partnership
16 Road 100 Widening - South of Interstate 182
17 Sacajawea Heritage Trail/Levee Lowering
18 Sandifur Parkway Widening
Projects
19 Court Street & Road 68 Intersection Improvements
20 Road 44 and Argent Road Intersection Analysis
21 Traffic Analysis for Interstate 182 @ SR 395 Interchange
22 Traffic Analysis for State Route 12 @ Tank Farm Road Interchange
23 FCID Canal Bicycle/Pedestrian Pathway Study
24 Crescent Road Surface Improvement
25 Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 1
26 Sandifur Parkway Extension - Phase 2
27 James Street Improvements
28 Road 76 Overpass
N/A Transportation System Master PlanPage 109 of 161
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 3, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19
FROM: Steve Worley, Director
Public Works
SUBJECT: Foster Wells Force Main Update & Agreement
I. REFERENCE(S):
Vicinity Map
Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 13.55
Reimbursement Agreement
Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Estimated project cost - $4.26 million
Funded with revenue bonds
Paid by Processors
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco has owned and operated the Pasco Process Water Reuse Facility
(PWRF) since 1995. The PWRF and associated farm properties are located in an area
of irrigated agriculture production fields on approximately 1,800 acres north of Pasco
off Foster Wells Road, east of Highway 395 in Franklin County.
The PWRF currently receives process wastewater from five food processors; Pasco
Processing, Twin City Foods, Reser’s, Simplot RDO, and Freeze Pack. Flows from the
first three processors listed are pumped from the Foster Wells Lift Station located at
the northeast corner of E Foster Wells Road and Industrial Way through two force
mains (16” and 8” diameters) to the PWRF.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 110 of 161
Due to the age of the existing Foster Wells force mains, breaks within the piping
system occur frequently. In 2018 there was a valve failure that caused a three-day shut
down of the pump station, which in turn shut down Pasco Processing, Twin City Foods
and Reser’s. The economic impact to each Processor of a shut down due to repairs to
the Foster Wells force main are significant enough that the Processors asked what
could be done to minimize the shutdowns.
The idea of a redundant force main from the Foster Wells Lift Station to the PWRF
was proposed. This additional force main would provide reliability through redundancy
to the system which would allow the flows from the lift station to the PWRF to be
switched between the existing force mains to the new force mains such that repairs to
either system could be made without shutdowns being required of the Processors. The
Processors have supported this idea and asked the City to move forward as quickly as
possible with the design and construction of this new force main.
PACE Engineers was selected to design the force main and the project is now out for
bid. The Processors have been notified that a reimbursement agreement for the cost of
this project will be required prior to the award of the bid.
Staff will provide a quick presentation of this information.
Page 111 of 161
EXISTING FOSTERWELLS LIFT STATIONNEW COLUMBIA EASTFORCE MAINS UNDERSEPARATE CONTRACTEXISTING FOSTER WELLSFORCE MAINS(SCHEDULE A)NEW FOSTER WELLSFORCE MAINFOSTER WELLS ROADFOSTER WELLS ROAD
US 395
US 395
CAPITAL AVENUE
PWRF(SCHEDULE B)COLUMBIA EASTFORCE MAINPage 112 of 161
Foster Wells Force Main
Reimbursement Agreement - 1 of 5
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF:
City of Pasco, Washington
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City Clerk
City of Pasco, Washington
525 North 3rd
Pasco WA 99301
_____________________________________________________________________________
FOSTER WELLS FORCE MAIN
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT between the City of Pasco, a Washington
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “City”; and Reser’s Fine Foods, Inc.,
hereinafter referred to as “Reser’s’; Tri-Cities Foods, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Twin City
Foods, Inc.”; and Pasco Processing, LLC, hereinafter referred to as “Pasco Processing”, and
collectively referred to as “Processors” enter into this Agreement for the purpose of providing an
additional force main processed wastewater transmission from the Processors’ business sites to
the City’s Reuse Facility according to the following terms and conditions.
WHEREAS, the City operates and maintains a Reuse Facility for the disposal of
wastewater from the Processors’ plants; and
WHEREAS, the existing 8” and 16” force mains, which were built as part of the original
Reuse Facility and the original Foster Wells Lift Station, are aging and often experience leaks
that need to be repaired; and
WHEREAS, when repairs to the existing 8” and/or 16” force mains are needed,
shutdown of the Processors flows to the Foster Wells Lift Station is sometimes needed, thus
causing economic impacts to the Processors; and
WHEREAS, the Processors have requested that the City construct a redundant 16” force
main from the Foster Wells Lift Station to the Reuse Facility such that if repairs to any of the
force mains are needed in the future, flows from the Processors can continue to the Reuse
Facility using the redundant force main, and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed, at its initial cost, to design and construct such
redundant 16” force main line; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the Processors’ request and direct benefit for the City’s design
and construction of this pipeline, the Processors have agreed to reimburse the City for the actual
costs of the design and construction of the pipeline.
Page 113 of 161
Foster Wells Force Main
Reimbursement Agreement - 2 of 5
NOW, THEREFORE,
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE MUTUAL CONVENANTS CONTAINED
HEREIN, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Design and Construction of the 16” Force Main Wastewater Pipeline. The
City, at its sole expense, shall provide for the design and construction of a 16” (iron pipe size or
equivalent HDPE size) force main wastewater distribution pipeline more particularly described
in Exhibit A which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The wastewater
distribution pipeline as described above, upon acceptance, shall be the sole and exclusive
property of the City with all rights and title thereto reserved to the City alone.
2. Cost of Project. The estimated cost of the project is $4,250,500. The City shall
upon completion of the design and execution of this Agreement expeditiously place the project
out for bid, and timely award the bid to a qualifying contactor in accordance with State law.
Upon completion of the project and acceptance by the City, the final actual cost of the project
shall be determined. The final actual cost of the project shall be the reimbursement amount
required to be paid by the Processors as provided in Section 3 below.
3. Allocation of Reimbursement Costs. The final reimbursement costs shall be
allocated among the Processors as a percentage based upon their existing permitted flows to the
Reuse Facility. The estimated costs and percentage of reimbursement for each processor is
identified below. These amounts shall be adjusted based on the final actual costs for the Project.
A. Reser’s Fine Foods, Inc.
Flow Amount 115 million gallons/year
Percentage 16%
B. Twin City Foods, Inc.
Flow Amount: 220 million gallons/year
Percentage: 31%
C. Pasco Processing, LLC
Flow Amount 383 million gallons/year
Percentage 53%
4. Reimbursement Schedule. Each Processors’ portion of the reimbursement cost,
together with interest, hall be paid to the City based on the debt service schedule of the financial
instrument used to fund the project. It is currently anticipated the City will sell bonds to be
repaid over a period of fifteen (15) years. Reimbursements shall be payable on the 1st day of
each month in the following amounts. These amounts shall be adjusted based on the final actual
costs for the Project.
A. Reser’s Find Foods, Inc. $ 4,820
B. Twin City Foods, Inc. $ 9,220
C. Pasco Processing, LLC $16,051
Page 114 of 161
Foster Wells Force Main
Reimbursement Agreement - 3 of 5
5. City’s Responsibility. The City shall assume sole responsibility and cost for the
maintenance and operation, and repair of the facility identified in Section 1 above except for any
damage or accelerated deterioration caused in whole or in part, by the negligent acts or omissions
of a Processor, including discharge of material inconsistent with the standards established by the
City for wastewater transmission, which damages, including the repair or replacement of the
effective portions of the pipeline, shall be the responsibility of the Processor or contributing
processors causing the damage who shall be solely liable for the reasonable costs of the repair or
replacement of the damaged components of the pipeline.
Processors shall have full use of the transmission pipeline, as an alternate or primary (at
the discretion of the City) transmission of processed wastewater from its plant to the City’s
Reuse Facility.
6. Default. In the event any Processor fails to make payment as provided in Section
4 above within thirty (30) days of the date due, a late fee in an amount equal to five percent (5%)
of the payment shall be assessed and due and payable by Processor. In the event Processor fails
to make payment, including the late fee, within sixty (60) days of the payment due date, the City
may elect to accelerate Processor’s obligation at which time the entire unpaid principal balance,
together with accrued interest, shall be payable in full. Processor shall not be entitled to any
offset against the payments required under this Agreement for any reason.
7. Dispute Resolution. In the event of failure to make any of the payments as
required above, and upon election by the City to accelerate that debt, venue for such action shall
be in Franklin County, Washington, the laws of the State of Washington shall apply, and the
prevailing party shall be awarded their reasonable fees and costs. In the event of any other
dispute other than the payment of money, the parties shall first meet in a good faith attempt to
resolve such dispute, with or without the assistance of mediation. In the event the dispute
remains, it shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, and the
Mandatory Rules of Arbitration (MAR). Venue shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington;
the laws of the State of Washington shall apply; and the prevailing party shall be entitled to its
reasonable attorney fees and costs.
8. Supplemental Agreements. This Agreement applies only to the construction of
the pipeline described in Section 1 above by the City, including the capital contributions by the
Processors. Maintenance and operation of the pipeline, together with the Reuse Facility, is
subject to a subsequent and supplemental agreement.
9. Assignability. This Agreement, and the rights and responsibilities hereunder,
shall not be assigned, conveyed, sublet, or transferred by the Processor without the prior written
consent of the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
10. Notice. Any notice or information required or permitted to be given to the parties
under this Agreement shall be to the following addresses, unless otherwise specified:
Page 115 of 161
Foster Wells Force Main
Reimbursement Agreement - 4 of 5
A. City of Pasco
Mr. Dave Zabell, City Manager
525 North 3rd
Pasco, WA 99301
(509) 545-3404
zabelld@pasco-wa.gov
B. Reser’s Fine Foods, Inc.
Mr. Mark Reser
15570 SW Jenkins Road
Beaverton OR 97006-0003
C. Twin City Foods, Inc.
Mr. Mark Lervick
10120 269th Place NW
Standwood WA 98292
D. Pasco Processing, LLC
Janelle McClory (jmcclory@westernmort.com)
PO Box 3110
Pasco,WA 99302
CC: sschossberger@oregonpotato.com
Notice shall be deemed given upon receipt of personal delivery, e-mail transmission, or
three (3) days after deposit in the United States Mail in the case of regular mail, or next day in
the case of overnight delivery.
11. Modification. This Agreement may not be amended, modified, or termination
except by written agreement signed and approved by all parties.
12. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective as of the _____ day of
___________, 2019, or upon the date of signature approval by the last party, whichever shall last
occur.
DATED this ________day of ____________, 2019.
[Signature page follows]
Page 116 of 161
Foster Wells Force Main
Reimbursement Agreement - 5 of 5
CITY OF PASCO:
By: ____________________________ Date: _______________________
Dave Zabell, City Manager
RESER’S FINE FOODS, INC.
By: ____________________________ Date: ______________________
Mark Reser,
TWIN CITY FOODS, INC.
By: _____________________________ Date: ______________________
Mark Lervick
PASCO PROCESSING, LLC
By: _____________________________ Date: ______________________
Steven Schossberger
Page 117 of 161
Pasco City Council Meeting
June 10, 2019
Foster Wells Force Main UpdatePage 118 of 161
PWRF EFFORTS
1.PWRF Capital Facilities
2.New Irrigation Pump Station
3.New Columbia East Pump Station
4.New Columbia East Force Mains
5.New Foster Wells Force Main
6.PWRF Pretreatment Improvements
Page 119 of 161
NEW FOSTER WELLS FORCE MAIN
DESCRIPTION:
2.4 Miles of 20 inch Force Main Connecting Foster Wells Pump Station to PWRF
STATUS:
Project currently advertised for bids
WORK IN PROGRESS:
Franklin County Right of Way Permit
BPA Crossing Permit
WSDOT Utility Franchise Permit
Utility Easement Negotiations
Reimbursement Agreement Page 120 of 161
New Foster Wells Force Main
Page 121 of 161
New Foster Wells Force Main
Estimated Project Schedule:
Advertise for Bids –May 24 & May 31, 2019
Bid Opening –June 11
Council Bid Award –June 17
Begin Construction –Mid July
Complete Construction –October 2019
Page 122 of 161
New Foster Wells Force Main
Processor Reimbursement
Agreement:
Reviewed by all three
Processors
Out to Processors for
signature
Executed Agreement
required prior to Bid Award
Page 123 of 161
Questions?Page 124 of 161
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 3, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Department
Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19
FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Senior Planner
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA2018-008)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Ordinance
Report to Planning Commission Dated: 5/16/2019
Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 3/21/2019 and 5/16/2019
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
No direct impact.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Continued growth and the need to provide housing has prompted interest from local
property owners, developers and staff on methods to increase housing stock. Housing
constructed within the City of Pasco City Limits are required to meet the various
requirements identified in the Pasco Municipal Code’s Subdivision Regulations (Title
21) and Zoning (Title 25).
The standards and requirements in the PMC provide a mechanism for the regulation
and division of land. While this creates a consistent and uniform manner for the city to
develop there are some constraints that limit the potential for housing construction to
occur in some areas.
The Pasco Municipal Code requires all lots to abut on a street (PMC 21.20.050).
However, the city contains lots, particularly west of Highway 395 and south of
Page 125 of 161
Interstate I-182 that are land locked or have irregular shapes that limit the potential for
public street frontage. Although these lots meet the lot size requirements to develop
additional housing, the public frontage requi rement, which was written with traditional
subdivision style development in mind, essentially prohibits the owners of many
irregular, or partially developed large lots, from subdividing the property.
Shared street frontages, or lots without public frontage provide the opportunity to
increase density, allows for greater diversity of housing styles and types and promotes
the infill of vacant or underutilized land within the city.
The Planning Commission has considered this item at several workshops and m eetings
beginning in late 2018. the Commission held a public hearing was on May 16th, 2019
and has recommended approval of the attached ordinance.
V. DISCUSSION:
City Council has identified increasing affordable housing as a Council Goal. Amending
the Pasco Zoning Code to allow for greater flexibility in housing production is likely to
assist in meeting those goals. Recent changes in Olympia, Spokane and Vancouver,
Washington have included similar changes to their zoning requirements.
Shared street frontages allow lots to have access via a private or shared driveway or
street. This would enable the development of infill housing in vacant and underutilized
lands to occur through the regulation of “flag lot” development. Flag Lots are defined
as lots not meeting minimum frontage requirements and where access to the public
right-of-way is by private driveway (PMC 25.15.140).
The ordinance as drafted provides another option for the City to meet the goals and
policies identified in the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff requests Council consideration of this proposed code revision.
Page 126 of 161
ORDINANCE NO. _______
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington
Amending Section 21.20 “Lots and Blocks” to Allow the creation
of Residential Lots without Public Street Frontage
WHEREAS, the City has pursuant to PMC 21.05.020 identified that regulating the division
of land within the Pasco Urban Growth Area to promote the health, safety, convenience,
comfort, prosperity and general welfare of the present and future inhabitants of the Pasco
Urban Growth Area; and
WHEREAS, the City has existing isolated lots where the width exceeds the depth,
creating constraints for efficient use of underutilized properties; and
WHEREAS, the requirement for public street frontage for each lot can prevent
development and the efficient use of land; and
WHEREAS, the City Comprehensive Plan identifies the encouragement of infill and
density development to protect open space and critical areas, accommodate population
increases and provide support for more walkable neighborhoods (LU-3-B);
WHEREAS. “Flag Lots” are defined as lots not meeting minimum frontage requirements
and where access to the public right-of-way is by a narrow private driveway, as defined in PMC
25.15.140; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that providing shared street frontage for isolated
residential lots (flag lots) may assist in meeting the goals of the City Comprehensive Plan, The
Washington State Growth Management Act and City Council Goals. NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 21.20.060 of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is
created and shall read as follows:
21.20.060 LOTS WITHOUT PUBLIC STREET FRONTAGE
(1) Characteristics
Flag lot developments may be approved on a lot without full public street frontage in
which access is provided by an approved private driveway / access strip.
(2) Restrictions and Standards
The City’s preferred standard for lot configuration are defined in Section 21.20.050.
Creation of residential lots without public street frontage may be approved only by
meeting the criteria identified in 21.20.060 (2) (a-n):
Page 127 of 161
a) Allowed in residential zones where construction of a public street would
prevent the achievement of the minimum residential density of the underlying
zone designation;
b) Permitted only where due to geometric, topographic, or other physical
features in proportion to the size of the development, would be impractical to
extend or build a publically dedicated street;
c) Must be approved through Subdivision process identified in Title 21 of the
Pasco Municipal Code;
d) There shall be no more than three adjoining lots created without public street
frontage;
e) Emergency Access: When the furthest point of a proposed structure is greater
than 150 feet in distance from the public right-of-way, as measured along an
accessible route, an approved fire vehicle turnaround is required as defined by
the International Fire Code
f) Parking: No parking is permitted along the access (shared driveway) portion of
the lot. The installation of No Parking signage may be required as a condition of
approval;
g) Utilities: Fire hydrants shall be located to meet the requirements of the
International Fire Code. Extension of sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water or other
utility lines that results from the creation of lot(s), will be at the expense of the
property owners and subject to approval by the City Public Works, Building and
Fire departments;
h) Drainage and storm water shall meet the requirements of PMC 16.10.050
i) Signage with addresses shall be posted on the public street side for all
properties that are adjacent to any private shared driveway or access;
j) Structural setbacks on lots without public street frontage shall conform to the
requirements of the applicable zone;
k) Access, maintenance and utility easements necessary to accommodate and
maintain proposed driveway / shared access improvements and utilizes shall be
approved through the Subdivision process in Title 21 and included on the face of
the final plat;
Page 128 of 161
l) Pavement sections for non-public street frontage driveway improvements are
subject to approval by the Pasco Public Works and Fire Department. Gravel
access will not be permitted;
m) The shared driveway / access must be maintained by the Homeowners
Association or by the adjoining property owners. A maintenance agreement
must be recorded prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy and
signage on the plat and must include provisions for snow removal, garbage
pickup and any other necessary provisions as determined by the City;
n) Access shared/common driveways for lots without public street frontage shall
abide by the minimum frontage, pavement and easement widths shown in the
table below:
Lot Configuration Minimum Lot
Frontage (Flag
Width)
Minimum Pavement
Width
Minimum Easement
Width
Single Family Detached; One Dwelling Unit per Lot
1 Lot 12 10 14
2 lots with adjacent flags 8 (per lot)15 19
3 lots with adjacent flags 8 (per lot)20 24
Multiple Dwellings
Duplex on 1 lot (2 Units on 1 lot)12 15 20
Section 2. That Section 21.20.050 of the Pasco Municipal Code (Lot Requirements), shall
be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
Every lot shall abut on a street.
(1) Lots with double frontage shall be avoided when possible.
(2) Corner lots in residential districts shall be designed to allow for appropriate setbacks of a
building from both streets.
(3) Side lines of lots shall be approximately at right angles to the street line or radial to curved
street lines.
(4) A plat containing lots adjacent to an arterial street shall not be approved unless the plat
recites a waiver of the right of direct access to the arterial. Exceptions to this requirement may
be permitted due to pre-existing development patterns that create practical difficulties for
limiting arterial access. [Ord. 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.16.050.]
(5) Lots without public frontage may be only be approved in residential zones where due to
geometric, topographic, or other physical features in proportion to the size of the development,
Page 129 of 161
would be impractical to extend or build a publically dedicated street. Regulations can be found
in Section 21.20.060 of the PMC;
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and
publication as required by the law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, and approved as provided by law this
________ day of ____________________, 2019.
_____________________________
Matt Watkins, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________ __________________________
City Clerk City Attorney
Page 130 of 161
MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers
DATE: THURSDAY, May 16th, 2019
7:00 PM
1
TO:Planning Commission
FROM:Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:Shared Street Frontages (Lots) (MF# CA 2018-008)
Background
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide an update to the Planning Commission
regarding the ongoing efforts to address appropriate infill and development strategies for the
City. This item was introduced to the Planning Commission in late 2018 followed by a public
hearing in February. It was postponed at the March 2019 meeting to allow for additional staff
review, considerations and refinement.
The discussions originate from the increasing need to accommodate housing needs in our city.
Staff has coordinated the details of the ordinances for review including the impacts and
relationship to housing, safety (fire and emergency) and transportation.
The following ordinance was proposed:
Ordinance: Residential Lots without Public Street Frontage (new)
Attached to the staff report are references (sketches) and ordinance for your review.
______________________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION:
MOTION: I move to close the public hearing on the proposed code amendments.
MOTION: I move the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council the adoption of the
proposed code amendments for Shared Street Frontages as contained in the May 16th, 2019
Planning Commission staff report.
Page 131 of 161
n)
Lot Configuration Minimum Lot Frontage / Flag
Width
Minimum Pavement
Width
Minimum Easement
Width
Single Family Detached; One Dwelling Unit per Lot
1 lot 12 10 14
2 lots with adjacent flags 8 (for each lot) 15 19
3 lots with adjacent flags 8 (for each lot) 20 24
Multiple Dwellings
Duplex on 1 lot (2 units on 1
lot)
12 (for each lot) 15 19
Page 132 of 161
SFDU – 1 Lot
New Lot
Existing Lot
< - 14' Min Easment Width - >
Min Pavement Width
Min Lot Frontage Width<- 12' Min ->
<-10' ->
PUBLIC STREET
Shared
Frontage /
Access
Fire / Emergency Access: If
length is 150 ft or more,
turnaround required as per IFC.
Page 133 of 161
SFDU – 2 Lots
Adjacent Lot 2
Adjacent Lot 1
Existing Lot
< - 19' Min Easment Width - >
Min Pavement Width
<- 16' Ft Min ->Min Lot Frontage Width
<-15' ->
PUBLIC STREET
Shared
Frontage /
Access
Fire / Emergency Access: If
length is 150 ft or more,
turnaround required as per IFC.
Page 134 of 161
SFDU – 3 Lots
Adjacent Lot 3
Adjacent Lot 2
Adjacent Lot 1
Existing Lot
< - 24' Min Easment Width - >
Min Pavement Width
Min Lot Frontage Width< - 24' Min - >
<-20' ->
PUBLIC STREET
Shared
Frontage /
Access
Fire / Emergency Access: If
length is 150 ft or more,
turnaround required as per IFC.
Page 135 of 161
MDU – Duplex
New Lot
Existing Lot
< - 20' Min Easment Width - >
Min Pavement Width
Min Lot Frontage Width
<-15' ->
<- 12' Min ->
PUBLIC STREET
Shared
Frontage /
Access
Fire / Emergency Access: If
length is 150 ft or more,
turnaround required as per IFC.
Page 136 of 161
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers
THURSDAY, MARCH 21, 2019
7:00 PM
E. Code Amendment Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA 2018-008)
Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff.
Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the proposed code amendment for shared street frontages.
The code amendment stems from the growing need to accommodate housing needs in the city and to
help develop unique or difficult lots for infill development. There were two proposed ordinances; an
ordinance amending PMC Section 21.20 “Lots and Blocks” to allow the creation of residential lots without
public street frontages and an ordinance amending PMC Section 25.140 “Planned Unit Development”.
Staff has coordinated the details of the ordinances for review including the impacts and relationship to
housing, safety (fire) and transportation. It was discussed in detail what the proposed ordinances
contained.
There was discussion between the Planning Commissioner’s and staff regarding the details of the
proposed code amendment and ordinances, in particular flag lots and PUD’s.
Commissioner Mendez noted a typo in which Mr. Gonzalez said would be corrected.
Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Mendez, to postpone the proposal to a
later date. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 137 of 161
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers
THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2019
7:00 PM
C. Code Amendment Code Amendment for Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA 2018-
008) – Continued from a previous meeting
Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff.
Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the code amendment for shared street frontages. The code
amendment would allow for infill development in particular in areas with irregular lot shapes that are not
able to develop with the current code that requires frontage. This would allow to develop with a private
driveway. The criteria and standards were discussed in detail for development, fire and safety. This would
be a tool for infill and not for regular development but would help meet housing goals.
Chairwoman Roach asked if it would be written in the code to be used only for infill.
Mr. Gonzalez explained that it would.
Commissioner Myhrum asked about emergency access standards.
Mr. Gonzales replied that cul de sacs would be preferred.
Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, added that it would be a 60’ radius turn
around in the cul de sac.
Commissioner Bowers asked about multiple dwellings that was given as an option and was concerned
about density.
Mr. Gonzalez stated that it would still have to meet the density standards of the zoning.
Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to close the public hearing on the
proposed code amendment. The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, the Planning Commission
recommend to the City Council the adoption of the proposed code amendments for shared street
frontages as contained in the May 16, 2016 Planning Commission staff report. The motion passed
unanimously.
Page 138 of 161
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 3, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19
FROM: Jacob Gonzalez, Senior Planner
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Code Amendment: Special Permits (MF# CA2019-008)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Report to Planning Commission Dated: 5/16/2019
Exhibit 1 - Zoning Map
Planning Commission Minutes Dated:5/16/2019
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
City staff received a request to amend the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) to include
automobile wrecking yards as an unclassified use within the Special Permits chapter of
Title 25 (Zoning). Staff and the Planning Commission reviewed the request and offers
the information below for Council’s consideration.
The applicant has submitted the request on behalf of a currently operating auto -
wrecking yard business located in Pasco. A specific site or location for the business
was not included in the request.
The request was brought to the Planning Commission at the April 2019 meeting for
discussion. May the at hearing public It an as held was 2019 open Planning
Commission meeting. The staff report indicated that applications for Special Permits
must undergo additional review the City Planning Commission and Council to allow
Page 139 of 161
for the consideration of mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate negative impacts on
surrounding uses.
PMC 25.200.020 provides a description of unclassified uses. Unclassified uses are
allowed in various zoning districts. A table and map were provided to the Planning
Commission representing the zoning districts in which the code amendment would be
applicable to. (See: Exhibit #1 Zoning Map)
On May 16th, 2019, the Planning Commission held a public hearing where they
recommended the denial of the proposed code amendment. Staff and the Planning
Commission received a letter from a local business supporting the denial of proposed
amendment.
V. DISCUSSION:
Automobile wrecking yards are currently permitted in the I-2 (Medium Industrial) and
I-3 (Heavy Industrial) zoning districts. The proposed code amendment would be
applicable via Special/Conditional Use Permit to the following zoning districts:
• C-3 - General Business
• BP - Business Park
• I-1 - Light Industrial
Neighboring jurisdictions limit automobile wrecking and storage sites to their heavier
and more intense industrial or manufacturing districts.
This item was also under consideration in late 2018 via a proposed code amendment to
allow for the expansion of a non-conforming use. The applicant withdrew that request
in February 2019.
The Planning Commission in particular, noted the proximity of C-3 zoning districts to
residential neighborhoods. For the reasons noted above and in the report, the Planning
Commission voted unanimously to decline the proposed code amendment adding
automobile wrecking yards as an unclassified use.
Staff recommends that the City Council consider the requested amendment and the
Planning Commission’s recommendation and provide direction regarding the requested
amendment. A resolution reflecting Council’s deliberation and direction will be
presented for formal action at the June 17th regular meeting of the City Council.
Page 140 of 161
MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers
DATE: THURSDAY, May 16th, 2019
7:00 PM
1
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: MF # CA2019-008 – Special Permits
City staff received a request to amend the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) to include automobile
wrecking yards as an unclassified use within the Special Permits chapter of Title 25 (Zoning).
Applications for special permits are required to undergo additional review by both the Pasco
Planning Commission and City Council. This allows for mitigation measures to be considered to
reduce or eliminate negative impacts on surrounding uses.
The Special Permits Chapter, in 25.200 provides information on the uses, requirements and
processes required for application. Unclassified Uses are described in 25.200.020 and the full list
is provided below:
PMC 25.200.020 Unclassified Uses
The following uses shall be considered unclassified:
(1) High schools, colleges, universities, vocational schools, business colleges and other
similar academic or skills training facilities or institutions not heretofore permitted within
any district;
(2) Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, and other places of burial or interment of
remains;
(3) Churches;
(4) Community service facilities, levels one and two, as defined in PMC 25.15.050;
(5) Airports, heliports, or any other landing or maneuvering space for aircraft, together
with terminals and other customary facilities accessory to the unclassified use;
(6) Golf courses, pitch-and-putt courses, miniature golf courses, water parks, sports
complexes, riding stables, and similar facilities for public, private or membership use;
(7) Monasteries, convents or other functionally similar facilities;
(8) Landfills, garbage dumps, and resource recovery facilities;
Page 141 of 161
2
(9) Off-site parking lots, except those required for a residential use, provided such
parking area is not more than 500 feet from the building;
(10) Electrical substations and load transfer stations, natural gas booster stations, and
other similar utility facilities;
(11) Park-and-ride lots, off-street transfer stations or other similar facilities involving the
storage, start-up, idling and movement of public or privately operated carriers, charter or
transit buses, vans, and similar vehicles; and
(12) Agricultural use (commercial), except in areas 1,000 feet from a residential zoning
district, subdivision or dwelling unit.
The proposed code amendment would add an additional unclassified use:
(13) Automobile wrecking yards, subject to the performance standards of 25.120.020 (2)
(a-e)
The text referencing PMC 25.120.020 regards to the permitted uses of the I-2 (Medium Industrial
District).
(2) Junkyards, automobile wrecking yards, scrap iron, scrap paper, or rag storage, sorting
or bailing shall be permitted, provided:
(a) An eight-foot, sight-obscuring fence must be constructed and inspected prior
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for use of the goods. The fence shall
be of solid single neutral color.
(b) No automobile or parts thereof, junk or salvage materials or parts thereof
shall be visible from any public right-of-way. All materials or parts shall be located
within the fenced area.
(c) Fire lanes shall be provided as required in the International Fire Code.
(d) A performance bond for $1,000 shall be required prior to the issuance of an
occupancy permit, to ensure compliance with provisions of this section. The bond
shall remain in force as long as the use exists.
(e) The permit shall be granted for a period not to exceed two years, and at the
end of such period an inspection shall be made of the premises to determine the
advisability of renewing such permit. [Ord. 3354 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 §
25.54.020.]
Page 142 of 161
3
A review of the Pasco Zoning Code was conducted and the table below represents zoning districts
and the applicability of the code amendment.
Zone Applicability
C-1 – Retail Business District Not Permitted
C-2 – Central Business District Not Permitted (PMC 25.90.050 (2))
C-3 – General Business District Requires Special/Conditional Use Permit (PMC 25.100.040)
CR – Regional Commercial District Not Permitted
BP – Business Park District Requires Special/Conditional Use Permit (PMC 25.110.040)
I-1 – Light Industrial District Requires Special/Conditional Use Permit (PMC 25.115.040)
I-2 – Medium Industrial District Permitted (PMC 25.120.020)
I-3 – Heavy Industrial District Permitted (PMC 25.125.020)
The map below depicts the zoning districts applicable through the approval of the proposed code
amendment:
Page 143 of 161
4
The City of Kennewick (WA) limits automobile wrecking and storage sites to their Heavy Industrial
zoning district and the City of Richland limits locations within their Heavy Manufacturing District.
The approval of the proposed code amendment would allow for currently operating or potential
new business to open in applicable zoning districts. In addition to potential benefits of new
businesses, staff encourages the Planning Commission also consider increased residential growth
east of Oregon Avenue and potential impacts to surrounding communities.
Staff recommends the denial of the code amendment request.
Included in the report is the letter of support from the applicant and an enlarged map displaying
applicable zoning districts.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed code amendments.
OPTION #1
MOTION: I move to deny the proposed code amendment to the Pasco Municipal Code and not
allow for the addition of automobile wrecking yards as an Unclassified Use as defined in PMC
25.200.020
OPTION #2
MOTION: I move to accept the proposed code amendments to the Pasco Municipal Code for
the addition of automobile wrecking yards as an Unclassified Use to PMC 25.200.020 and
schedule deliberations and a recommendation to City Council for the June 20th, 2019 Planning
Commission Meeting.
Page 144 of 161
Zoning
District
BP
C-1
C-2
C-3
CR
I-1
I-2
I-3
O
R-1
R-1-A
R-1-A2
R-1/PUD
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-S-1
R-S-1/PUD
RP
RS-12
RS-20
RT
Zoning selection
City Limits
Pasco Urban Growth Boundary
¯Page 145 of 161
Land Use Solutions
& Entitlement Land Use Planning Services 9101 N. MT. VIEW LANE Spokane, WA 99218
509-435-3108 (V)
4-30-19
Mr. Rick White
Community & Economic Development Director
City Hall
525 N Third Avenue
Pasco WA 99301
Ref: Draft Zone Code Amendment PMC 25.200. 020 Unclassified Uses
Dear Mr. White:
Upon review of Chapter 25 of the PMC, I find that there is very little language needing
amendment to provide for automobile wrecking yard use within “Unclassified Uses”. In other
words, simply add a new line item to 25.200.020 (13) Automobile Wrecking Yard. (See
attached). This would then require the proposed use to become a Conditional Use Permit
reviewed by the Planning Commission pursuant to the applicable provisions and procedures of
said Chapter 25.200.
As such, automobile wrecking yards would then be permitted by CUP as an Unclassified Use
within the C-3 zone and the I-1 zone and be permitted outright within the I-2 and the I-3 zones. I
would also point out that the I-2 zone has performance criteria for auto wrecking yards as well as
similar outdoor open storage uses.
Please note that I had originally suggested that this CUP adhere to the performance criteria
spelled out within the I-2 zone under 25.120.020 (2) a-e. However, Chapter 25.200 seems to
cover this aspect in 25.200.080. I was simply trying to address “automobile wrecking yards
rather than other similar outdoor storage uses as mentioned within that sub-section. I will leave
this recommendation for you and staff to make.
Please let me know your thoughts and of course, when this is scheduled for a PC hearing. Thank
you for your help in bringing about a better solution for a zoning dilemma.
Respectfully Submitted
Dwight J Hume
Dwight J Hume
Attached draft language
Page 146 of 161
25.200.020 Unclassified Uses
The following uses shall be considered unclassified:
(1) High schools, colleges, universities, vocational schools, business colleges and other similar
academic or skills training facilities or institutions not heretofore permitted within any district;
(2) Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, and other places of burial or interment of remains;
(3) Churches;
(4) Community service facilities, levels one and two, as defined in PMC 25.15.050;
(5) Airports, heliports, or any other landing or maneuvering space for aircraft, together with
terminals and other customary facilities accessory to the unclassified use;
(6) Golf courses, pitch-and-putt courses, miniature golf courses, water parks, sports complexes,
riding stables, and similar facilities for public, private or membership use;
(7) Monasteries, convents or other functionally similar facilities;
(8) Landfills, garbage dumps, and resource recovery facilities;
(9) Off-site parking lots, except those required for a residential use, provided such parking area
is not more than 500 feet from the building;
(10) Electrical substations and load transfer stations, natural gas booster stations, and other
similar utility facilities;
(11) Park-and-ride lots, off-street transfer stations or other similar facilities involving the
storage, start-up, idling and movement of public or privately-operated carriers, charter or
transit buses, vans, and similar vehicles; and
(12) Agricultural use (commercial), except in areas 1,000 feet from a residential zoning district,
subdivision or dwelling unit. [Ord. 4110 § 30, 2013; Ord. 3514 § 7, 2001; Ord. 3354 § 2, 1999;
Code 1970 § 25.86.020.]
(13) Automobile Wrecking Yards
Page 147 of 161
Zoning
District
BP
C-1
C-2
C-3
CR
I-1
I-2
I-3
O
R-1
R-1-A
R-1-A2
R-1/PUD
R-2
R-3
R-4
R-S-1
R-S-1/PUD
RP
RS-12
RS-20
RT
Zoning selection
City Limits
Pasco Urban Growth Boundary
¯
0 1 20.5 Miles
EXHIBIT #1 - ZONING MAP
Page 148 of 161
25.200.020 Unclassified Uses
The following uses shall be considered unclassified:
(1) High schools, colleges, universities, vocational schools, business colleges and other similar
academic or skills training facilities or institutions not heretofore permitted within any district;
(2) Cemeteries, crematories, mausoleums, and other places of burial or interment of remains;
(3) Churches;
(4) Community service facilities, levels one and two, as defined in PMC 25.15.050;
(5) Airports, heliports, or any other landing or maneuvering space for aircraft, together with
terminals and other customary facilities accessory to the unclassified use;
(6) Golf courses, pitch-and-putt courses, miniature golf courses, water parks, sports complexes,
riding stables, and similar facilities for public, private or membership use;
(7) Monasteries, convents or other functionally similar facilities;
(8) Landfills, garbage dumps, and resource recovery facilities;
(9) Off-site parking lots, except those required for a residential use, provided such parking area
is not more than 500 feet from the building;
(10) Electrical substations and load transfer stations, natural gas booster stations, and other
similar utility facilities;
(11) Park-and-ride lots, off-street transfer stations or other similar facilities involving the
storage, start-up, idling and movement of public or privately-operated carriers, charter or transit
buses, vans, and similar vehicles; and
(12) Agricultural use (commercial), except in areas 1,000 feet from a residential zoning district,
subdivision or dwelling unit. [Ord. 4110 § 30, 2013; Ord. 3514 § 7, 2001; Ord. 3354 § 2, 1999;
Code 1970 § 25.86.020.]
(13) Automobile Wrecking Yards
Page 149 of 161
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers
THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2019
7:00 PM
D. Code Amendment Code Amendment Regarding Special Permits for Auto-
Wrecking (MF# CA 2019-008) – Continued from a previous
meeting
Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff.
Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the code amendment regarding special permits for auto-
wrecking. The applicant wishes to amend the Pasco Municipal Code section regarding special permits to
add an unclassified use to allow for automobile wrecking yards. Special permits are required to undergo
special review by Staff, Planning Commission and City Council. Staff illustrated in the staff report where
this code amendment could be applicable if approved. If permitted, it still would not be allowed in the C-
1 or C-2 zones but would be allowed via special permit in the C-3, BP and I-1 zoning districts. The zoning
code already permits the use of auto-wrecking in I-2 and I-3 zoning districts. Because it is already allowed
in the I-2 and I-3 zoning districts, City Staff did not recommend the approval of the code amendment.
Dwight Hume, 9101 N. Mountain View Lane, Spokane, WA spoke on behalf of his client how currently
owns an auto-wrecking yard in Pasco. His client is looking to remediate code enforcement violations
because part of their business is on a non-conforming site. He discussed in detail the issues with non-
conforming uses in Pasco.
Commissioner Bowers asked for clarification to for the location of the non-conforming portion of his
client’s property.
Mr. Hume stated that it is an adjoining property.
Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, added that the location is on ‘A’ Street but
the issues isn’t a site specific issues. This code amendment would apply city-wide.
Commissioner Myhrum agreed with staff that this code amendment would not be optimal. He asked if
there was a way to handle non-conforming use expansion on a case by case basis.
Mr. Gonzalez stated that earlier in the year the Planning Commission did look at expansion of non-
conforming uses but that request was withdrawn by the applicant to pursue this code amendment
instead.
Mr. White reminded the Planning Commission that they also didn’t express interest at that time in
expanding non-conforming uses.
Commissioner Myhrum asked if the applicant could apply for a rezone to conform.
Page 150 of 161
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
City Hall – 525 North Third Avenue – Council Chambers
THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2019
7:00 PM
Mr. White said rezones could be requested. In this case, it may need to be accompanied by a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
Commissioner Bowers asked if the staff recommendation for denial of the code amendment was due to
its proximity to residential.
Mr. Gonzalez said the main reason was because there are already existing zones were this type of use is
appropriate.
Chairwoman Roach asked what Staff would recommend in this case for the auto-salvaging company in
order to resolve their issues.
Mr. White replied that Staff didn’t know if they could recommend anything. The Planning Commission
needs to look at whether they are comfortable with wrecking yards in C-3 Zones. He briefly went over
the history of the property in question and non-conforming uses.
Commissioner Bowers said it is unfortunate that the applicant is having difficulties operating their
business due to its non-conformity but with that said, she was not in favor of adding wrecking yards to
the list of unclassified uses.
Chairwoman Roach, Commissioner Myhrum and Commissioner A. Campos were in agreement with
Commissioner Bowers.
Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to close the hearing on the
proposed code amendment. The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to deny the proposed code
amendment to the Pasco Municipal Code and not allow for the addition of automobile wrecking yards as
an Unclassified Use as defined in PMC 25.200.020. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 151 of 161
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 6, 2019
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/10/19
FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) Risk Pool Update
I. REFERENCE(S):
Pasco 2014 - 2018 Risk Profile
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation to Council by Justin Tucker Safety/Training Specialist
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City has been a member of the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA), a self
insurance risk pool of about 170 Washington cities and special purpose districts/entities, since
1986. The Authority is created by an interlocal agreement between the several entities and
provides members with options for liability and property damage coverage in addition to
several specialized coverages (cyber, boiler and machinery, special events, etc.) The City's
participation is limited to liability (general and automobile) plus cyber coverage. The City has
found that property coverage rates are more favorable with a local commercial broker as many
natural hazard coverage costs can be minimized through underwriting (flood and earthquakes).
In addition to coverage for liability exposures, WCIA also provides risk management
consulting and training to assist members. As virtually all cities and most special districts have
similar exposures, the Authority can offer services which are essentially custom developed for
the City's needs.
The presentation is designed to provide Councilmembers with an introduction to the Insurance
Authority as well as to provide a review of the City's claim experience over the five year period
of 2014 - 2018.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 152 of 161
Risk Profile I City of Pasco6/10/2019Page 153 of 161
INTROPage 154 of 161
EXPECTED VS. ACTUALPage 155 of 161
EXPECTED VS. ACTUAL BY DEPARTMENTPage 156 of 161
CLAIM FREQUENCY AND SEVERITYPage 157 of 161
CLAIM SEVERITY 2014-2018Page 158 of 161
TOP LOSSES BY FREQUENCY AND SEVERITY 2014-2018Page 159 of 161
STEWARDSHIP REPORT 2014-2018Summary of BenefitsConsultation $11,562.30Grants $8,900.00Pre-Defense $27,479.10Reimbursement $12,231.33Total: $60,172.73Page 160 of 161
2019 TRAININGS TO MITIGATE RISK2019 Education January Full Board Session-Confronting Homelessness2019 May Full Board Education Session-WCIA insurance Coverage from A to UWCIA Parks and Recreation Forum-Risk ManagementBuilding Supervisory Skills 101Building Supervisory Skills 201Building Supervisory Skulls 301Employment Law for SupervisorsWCIA Parks and Recreation Forum-Risk Management WICA Parks and Recreation Forum-Risk Management2019 WCIA Spring Municipal Attorney TrainingEmployment Law for Supervisors2019 January Full Board Education SessionPublic Works Risk Management 1012019May Full Board Education Session Insurance CoverageBuilding Supervisory Skills 101Building Supervisory Skills 201Building Supervisory Skills 301Employment Law for SupervisorsWCIA Parks and Recreation Forum-Risk ManagementBuilding Supervisory Skills 301Building Supervisory Skills 101Building Supervisory Skills 201Page 161 of 161