The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-20-2019 Planning Commission Meeting PacketI. II. 111. IV. v. VI. VII. VII I. IX. 1lii P~Sco CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES: OLD BUSINESS: A. Code Amendment PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Special Permit B. Block Grant c. Block Grant D. Block Grant E. Code Amendment F. Code Amendment G. Code Amendment WORKSHOP: OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall -525 North Third Avenue -Council Chambers THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2019 7:00 PM Declaration of Quorum May 16, 2019 Code Amendment for Minimum Lot Sizes (MF# CA 2017-009} Special Permit for the location of a museum annex building (Franklin County Museum} (MF# SP 2019-002} -Continued from a previous meeting 2020 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG} Allocations (MF# BGAP 2019-003) 2020 HOME Fund Allocations (MF# BGAP 2019-004) 2020 Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Fund Allocations (MF# BGAP 2019-005) Code Amendment Regarding Maximum Dwelling Height in R-3 and R-4 Zoning Districts (MF# CA 2019-009) Code Amendment Regarding Revisions to Planned Unit Developments (MF# CA 2019-010} Code Amendment Regarding Sidewalk Requirements (MF# CA 2019-011) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pa sco-w a .co m/psc t vl ive . Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact staff for assistance. CALL TO ORDER: MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall -525 North Third Avenue -Council Chambers THURSDAY, MAY 16, 2019 7:00 PM The meeting was called to order at 7:00 pm by Chairperson Roach . ATTENDANCE: Commissioners Present: Tanya Bowers, Joseph Campos, Abel Campos, Isaac Myhrum, Zahra Roach, Pam Bykonen Staff Present: Rick White (Community & Economic Development Director), Jacob B. Gonzalez (Senior Planner), Darcy Bourcier (Planner I), Krystle Shanks (Administrative Assistant II) MEETING VIDEO ON DEMAND: This meeting in its entirety has been posted and can be viewed on the City's webpage at https://psctv.viebit.com . APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS: Chairperson Roach read a statement about the appearance of fairness for hearings on land use matters. There were no declarations. Chairperson Roach then asked the audience and the Planning Commission if there were any objections based on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness question regarding the items to be discussed . There were no objections . ADMINISTERING THE OATH: Chairperson Roach explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or affirmation. Chairperson Roach swore in all those desiring to speak . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos that the minutes dated March 21, 2019 . The motion passed unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: A. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat, Black Belle Estates (33 lots) (J&J Kelly Construction) (MF# PP 2019-001) Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Darcy Bourcier, Planner I, discussed the preliminary plat application for Black Belle Estates (33 lots). There Planning Comm ission Meeti n g Page 1 May 16, 2019 were no further questions or comments . Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the May 16, 2019 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commis sioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, based on the findings of fact and conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Black Belle Estates with conditions as listed in the May 16, 2019 staff report . The motion passed unanimously. B. Rezone Rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) to C-3 (General Business) (YESMAR Properties Inc.) (MF# Z 2019-004) Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the rezone application from C-1 (Retail Business) to C-3 (General Business) with a concomitant agreement to eliminate some of the heavier uses typically allowed in C-3 zones but would allow for specific uses as the applicant requested. Commissioner Myhrum asked if the applicant was in agreement with the current conditions as listed in the staff report and concomitant agreement. The applicant did not wish to further speak to the item and was in agreement with the conditions. Commissioner A. Campos moved, seconded by Commissioner J. Campos, to close the hearing and adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the May 16, 2019 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner A. Campos moved, seconded by Commissioner Myhrum, based on the f indings of fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission recommend the City Council rezone the parcel from C-1 (Retail Business) to C-3 (General Business), with a concomitant agreement limiting the uses to those found in the C-1 zoning district, with the addition of microbreweries, and adding conditions pertaining to design standards. The motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Special Permit Location of Franklin County Museum Annex Building (Franklin County Historical Society) (MF# SP 2019-002)-Continued from a previous meeting Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the special permit application for the location of the Franklin County Museum Annex Building. A new site plan was submitted but there are still remaining concerns to parking. Planning Co mmissi o n Meeting Page 2 May 16, 2019 There was discussion between Staff and Commissioner regarding the PUD Easement, power access and the rev ised site plan and alley way access . Ri chard Scheuerman, 2685 Torrey Pines Way, Richland , WA spoke in support of hi s special permit application. He stated that they have revised the site plan due to feedback from the previous meeting. Commissioner Roach asked Mr. Scheuerman if he had a chance to look over the approval conditions, parking in particular. Mr. Scheuerman replied that he had and they are willing to do what it takes . Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner J. Campos, moved to continue th e publi c hearing for the special permit on the proposed location of an annex building for the Franklin County Museum in the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district to the June 20, 2019 Planning Commission Meeting. The motion passed unanimously. B. Code Amendment Code Amendment for Minimum Lot Sizes (MF# CA 2017-009) - Continued from a previous meeting Chairp erson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Darcy Bourcier, Planner I, discussed the code amendment for minimum lot sizes. In March 2019, the Planning Commi ss ion was in agreement to leave the R-1 zoning district at 7,200 square foot minimum lot sizes and 60' of frontage. Proposed revisions were to R-2 {5,000 sqft. minimum), R-3 (4,500 sqft . minimum) and R-4 {4 ,000 sqft . minimum) to change them to 50' lot frontages. There was discussion between Staff and Commi ssioners regarding the revi sions, ensuring the minimum lot sizes and frontages were proportionate, and minimum frontages in neighboring cities compared to the proposed lot frontages for Pasco . Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Myhrum, to close the public hearing on the proposed code amendment and set June 20, 2019 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. The motion passed unanimously. c. Code Amendment Code Amendment for Shared Street Frontages (MF# CA 2018- 008) -Continued from a previous meeting Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the code amendment for shared street frontages . The code amendment would allow for infill development in particular in areas with irregular lot shapes that are not able to develop with the current code that requires frontage. This would allow to develop with a private driveway. The criteria and standards were discussed in detail for development, fire and safety. This would be a tool for infill and not for regular development but would help meet housing goals. Chairwoman Roach asked if it would be written in the code to be used only for infill. Planning Co mmiss ion Meeting Pag e 3 May 16, 2019 Mr. Gonzalez explained that it would. Commissioner Myhrum asked about eme rgen cy access sta ndard s. Mr. Gonzales replied that cul de sacs would be preferred. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, added that it would be a 60' radius turn around in the cul de sac . Commissioner Bowers asked about multiple dwellings that was given as an option and was concerned about density. Mr. Gonzalez stated that it would still have to meet the density standards of the zoning. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to close the public hearing on the proposed code amendment. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, the Pl an ning Commission recommend to the City Council the adoption of the proposed code amendments for shared street frontages as contained in the May 16, 2016 Planning Commission staff report. The motion passed unanimously. D. Code Amendment Code Amendment Regarding Special Permits for Auto-Wrecking (MF# CA 2019-008) -Continued from a previous meeting Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner, discussed the code amendment regarding special permits for auto- wrecking. The applicant wishes to amend the Pasco Municipal Code sect ion regarding special permits to add an uncla ss ified use to allow for automobile wrecking yards . Special permits are required to undergo special review by Staff, Planning Commission and City Council. Staff illustrated in the staff report where this code amendment could be applicable if approved . If permitted, it still would not be allowed in the C-1 or C-2 zones but would be allowed via special permit in the C-3, BP and 1-1 zoning di stricts . The zon ing code already permits the use of auto-wrecking in 1-2 and 1-3 zoning districts. Because it is already allowed in the 1-2 and 1- 3 zoning districts, City Staff did not recommend the approval of the code amendment. Dwight Hume, 9101 N. Mountain View Lane, Spokane, WA spoke on behalf of his client how currently owns an auto-wrecking yard in Pasco . His client is looking to remediate code enforcement violations because part of their business is on a non-conforming site. He discussed in detail the issues with non-c onforming uses in Pasco . Commissioner Bowers aske d for clarification to for the location of the non-conforming portion of his client's property. Mr. Hume stated that it is an adjoining property. Pl anning Commission Meeting Page 4 May 16, 2019 Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, added that the location is on 'A' Street but the issues isn't a site specific issues. This code amendment would apply city-wide . Comm issioner Myhrum agreed with staff that this code amendment would not be optimal. He asked if there was a way to handle non-conforming use expansion on a case by case basis . Mr. Gonzalez stated that earlier in the year the Planning Commission did look at expansion of non-conforming uses but that request was withdrawn by the applicant to pursue this code amendment instead . Mr. White reminded the Planning Commission that they also didn't express interest at that time in expanding non-conforming uses. Commissioner Myhrum asked if the applicant could apply for a rezone to conform . Mr. White said rezones could be requested . In this case , it may need to be accompanied by a Comprehensive Plan Amendment . Commissioner Bowers asked if the staff recommendation for denial of the code amendment was due to its proximity to residential. Mr. Gonzalez said the main reason was because there are already existing zones were this type of use is appropriate. Chairwoman Roach asked what Staff would recommend in this case for the auto-salvaging company in order to resolve their issues . Mr. White replied that Staff didn't know if they could recommend anything. The Planning Commission needs to look at whether they are comfortable with wrecking yards in C-3 Zones . He briefly went over the history of the property in question and non -conforming uses. Commissioner Bowers said it is unfortunate that the applicant is having difficulties operating their business due to its non-conformity but with that said , she was not in favor of adding wrecking yards to the list of unclassified uses. Chairwoman Roach, Commissioner Myhrum and Commissioner A. Campos were in agreement with Commissioner Bowers. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to close the hearing on the proposed code amendment. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner A. Campos, to deny the proposed code amendment to the Pasco Municipal Code and not allow for the addition of automobile wrecking yards as an Unclassified Use as defined in PMC 25 .200 .020. The motion passed unanimously. WORKSHOP: Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 May 16, 2019 A. Code Amendment Code Amendment to Increase Dwelling Height in R-3 and R-4 Zones (MF# CA 2019-009) Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Darcy Bourcier, Planner I, discussed the proposed code amendment to increase dwelling heights in the R-3 and R-4 zoning districts. There was discussion between Staff and Commissioners regarding some concerns as well as support for the code amendment . No action wa s required at this t ime but the Commissioners agreed to bring it ba ck to the June meeting as a public hearing item . OTHER BUSINESS : A. Comprehensive Plan Comprehensive Plan Update (April 22, 2019 City Council Workshop Meeting) Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, gave a presentation on the Comprehensive Plan Update. The slides presented were from the April 22 , 2019 City Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT: With no further discussion or business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 8 :3 6 PM . Respectfully submitted, Krystle Shanks , Administrative Assistant II Community & Economic Development Department Pl anni ng Co mmission Meeting Page 6 May 16, 2019 MEMO TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall -525 North Third Avenue -Council Chambers THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2019 7:00 PM TO: FROM: Planning Commission Darcy Bourcier, Planner I SUBJECT: Minimum Lot Size and Frontage in Residential Zones (MF# CA 2017-009) Introduction The PMC states that for lots under 10,000 square feet in size, the minimum lot frontage is to be 60 feet. This provision includes zones R-1 (Low Density Residential) through R-4 (High Density Residential), which each have their own designated minimum lot size requirement (see table 1). However, interest has been expressed to decrease the minimum lot frontage for these residential zones . To illustrate, a property may be zoned R-1 which allows for a minimum lot area of 7,200 square feet and a minimum frontage of 60 feet . If one was to seek a rezone of the property from R- 1 to R-2-which would decrease the minimum lot size to 6,000 square feet-the minimum frontage would remain 60 feet. In the interest of creating additional lots for new dwellings in Pasco , the City is proposing the amendment of the Zoning Code to decrease the minimum frontage from 60 feet to 50 feet for zones R-2 through R-4 . By doing so , the resulting increase in lot density would allow for more homes to be constructed to help accommodate Pasco's growing population . Considering the above information, staff is also entertaining the idea of decreasing minimum lot size accordingly. Should the minimum frontage decrease while the minimum lot size remains unchanged, there is a concern regarding the possibility of disproportionately-sized lots . Therefore, staff proposes revisions to minimum lot size in zoning districts R-2 , R-3 , and R-4 , and seeks the Planning Commiss ion 's input on modifying the Zoning Code in order to accommodate builders and developers in their effort to offe r diverse residential properties at affordable prices while avoiding facilitating the creation of impractical or awkward lots. The R-2, R-3 and R-4 zoning districts allow for the development of single-family dwellings and multiple family structures such as duplexes, fourplexes and apartment buildings. Although established to allow multiple dwelling units on a single lot, the multi-family zoning districts can be a source of single family homes on smaller lots. Below is a table detailing Pasco's current zoning standards regarding single family dwellings in low-to-high density residential zones. Table 1 Pasco (current standard) Min Lot Size Min Lot Frontage (sq . ft.) (ft.) Low Density (R -1) 7,200 60 Med Density (R-2) 6,000 60 Med Density (R-3) 5,500 60 High Density (R-4) 5,000 60 1 Background The City of Pasco created the R-2 and R-3 zoning districts in 196S in which no lot within those two districts could be smaller than SO by 100 feet {S,000 square feet). This minimum lot size has been in the code in one form or another since 196S. Much of the original portions of Pasco were platted prior to the establishment of zoning. The general practice for platting in the early years was to divide blocks into 2S-foot wide lots . Builders would then buy two or more lots to build houses or commercial buildings. As a result it is not uncommon to find single-family lots close to or below S,000 square feet in size in older areas of town. The smallest lots in central Pasco between the High school and Sylvester Park (zoned R-1) are 4,7SO square feet. The smallest lots south of "A" Street are just over 4,600 square feet; some contain S,2SO square feet and others are slightly larger at S,400 square feet. Zoning Comparisons Kennewick and Richland both permit individual lots in their version of the R-2 and R-3 zones with a minimum of 4,000 square feet. The following tables show the minimum lot size and frontage standards for single family dwellings in Pasco's neighboring cities. Table 2 Kennewick Min Lot Size Min Lot Frontage Min Lot Width* (sq. ft .) (ft.) (ft.) Suburban (RS) 10,SOO 30 60 Low Density (RL) 7,SOO 30 60 Med Density (RM) 4,000 30 so High Density (RH) 4,000 30 N/A * Measured at front setback line Table 3 Richland Min Lot Size Min Lot Frontage (sq. ft .) (ft .) Single Family Res {R-1-12) 10,000 90 Single Family Res (R-1-10) 8,000 70 Med Density (R-2) 6,000 so Med Density Small (R-2S) 4,000 42 Multi Family (R-3) 4,000 42 Previous Code Amendments In 2014 a developer applied for R-2 zoning with the intent of building only single-family homes . Although most of the lots in the proposed development were in excess of 6,000 square feet the 2 potential wa s there for a development with numerous 5,000 square foot lots. The creation of 5,000 square foot single-family lots without forethought to building design and subdivision integration with ex isting and adjacent neighborhoods had the potential to impact those nei ghboring developments . As a result, the Planning Commiss ion wa s asked to provide some input on the matter as to whether or not the multi-family zoning districts should be reviewed as it related lot size s. Later that year the City Council pas sed Ordinance 4173 to amend PMC Title 25 to increase the minimum lot size from 5,000 to 6,000 square feet in the R-2 zoning district and 5,000 to 5,500 square feet in the R-3 zoning district. It can be argued, then, that reverting back to smaller minimum lot sizes in the medium-to-high density residential zon i ng districts would essentially negate what Ord i nance 4173 had accomplished . Once a developer goe s through the process to obtain multi-family zoning he does not usually diminish his potential return by building single-family homes . Options Because the Planning Commission indicated that the minimum lot frontage and size requirements of the R-1 zoning district should remain as they are, staff ha s updated the proposed standard accordingly (see table 4). Option #1 : The proposed changes have been highlighted below. Table 4 Pasco (proposed standard) Min Lot Size Min Lo t Frontage (sq. ft.) (ft.) Low Density (R-1) 7,200 60 Med Density (R-2) 5,000 50 Med Density (R-3) 4,500 50 High Density (R-4) 4,000 50 Option #2 : Some other variation of Option #1. Option #3 : Maintain the current standard . RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Recommendation: I move the Planning Commission recommend to City Council the adoption ofthe proposed amendment as contained in the June 20, 2019 Planning Commission memo. 3 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PMC CHAPTER 21 (SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS) AND 25 (ZONING) TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE AND FROTANGE REQUIREMENTS IN CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, the development and approval of plats within the State of Washington are governed by RCW 58.17; and, WHEREAS, local subdivision regulations including the City of Pasco subdivision regulations within Title 21 of the Pasco Municipal must conform to RCW 58.17; and , WHEREAS, the PMC currently states that parcels under 10,000 square feet in size must have at least 60 feet of street right-of-way frontage ; and , WHEREAS, interest has been expressed to decrease the minimum lot size and frontage requirements in certain residential zones; and, WHEREAS, decreasing the minimum lot size and frontage in certain residential zones would increase housing density to allow for more homes to be constructed to help accommodate Pasco's growing population; and, WHEREAS, the proposed rev1s10ns have been considered by the Pasco Planning Commission at a public hearing and the Commission has recommended City Council approve the revisions; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That section 21.20.040 of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 21.20.040 MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS. Lot areas shall confonn to the requirements of PMC Title 25. ( 1) Width and Depth. (a) Lot depth exceeding two and one-half times the lot width shall be avoided. (2) Frontage. A minimum frontage area for each lot shall be required as follows: (a) Lots in the R-1, R-1-A , and R-l-A2 zoning districts with less than 10 ,000 square feet in area shall have a minimum frontage of 60 feet except lots fronting on cul-de- sacs, which shall have a minimum frontage of35 feet and a width of 50 feet or more at the setback line; (b) Lots in the R-2 , R-3, and R-4 z oning districts with less than 10,000 square feet in area shall have a minimum frontage of 50 feet except lots fronting on cul-de-sacs. which shall have a minimum frontage of 35 feet and a width of 50 feet or more at the setback line; and except lots that are part of z ero-lot-l ine developments, which shall have a minimum frontage of 30 feet; (£} Lots with more than 10,000 square feet in area shall have a minimum frontage of 90 feet except lots fronting on cul-de-sacs, which shall have a minimum frontage of 35 feet and a width of 50 feet or more at the setback line. (3) In no case shall a residential lot contain less than 5,000 4,000 square feet of lot area unless the lot is approved by the City through the planned unit development or planned density development process~, or if the lot is part of a zero-lot-line development. (4) In subdivisions where septic tanks or other individual sewage disposal devices are to be installed, the size oflots shall be subject to the approval of the Benton/Franklin Health District, but by no means shall be smaller in size than the applicable zoning district in which the lot is located. [Ord . 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.16.040.] Section 2. That section 25.60.050 of the Pasco Municipal Code (R-2 Medium Density Residential) shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 25.60.050 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. (I) Minimum lot area: 6,000 5,000 square feet ; (2) One single-family dwelling shall be pennitted per lot. Multiple dwellings shall be permitted based on the density standards in PMC 25.60.050(3); (3) Density: One dwelling per 6,()00 5,000 square feet of lot area for single-family dwellings and~ 4,000 square feet of lot area for multiple-family dwellings except a s provided in PMC 25.60.030(8); (4) Maximum lot coverage: 40 percent; ( 5) Minimum Yard Setbacks. (a) Front: 20 feet ; (b) Side: five feet ; (c) Rear: Principal building: Equal to the height of the dwelling; Accessory structures: Accessory structures adjacent an alley may be placed on the alley line provided there are no openings in the wall parallel to the alley. Garages with vehicle doors parallel to an alley shall be set back from the alley 20 feet. Where there is no alley the setback shall be five feet. Structures related to rabbits and/or chicken hens, such as rabbit hutches and/or chicken coops, must be at least 10 feet from any property line, may not exceed six feet in height and 30 square feet in size, and must be located behind the rear line of the dwelling. Rabbit hutches and/or chicken coops adjacent an alley may be placed within five feet of the alley line provided there are no openings in the wall parallel to the alley. Property owners shall not allow such structures to become a nuisance due to noi se or odor. (6) Maximum Building H eight. (a) Principal building: 25 feet , except a greater height may be approved by special permit; (b) Accessory buildings: 15 feet ; (7) Fences and hedges: See Chapter 25.180 PMC; (8) Parking: See Chapter 25.185 PMC; (9) Landscaping: See Chapter 25 .180 PMC; and (10) Residential design standards: See PMC25.165.100.[0rd. 4110 §14, 2013; Ord. 4040 § 7, 2012; Ord. 4036 § 15 , 2011; Ord. 3731 § 14, 2005; Ord. 3354 § 2 , 1999; Code 1970 § 25.34.050 .] Section 3 . That section 25.6 5.050 of the Pas co Municipal Code (R-3 Medium D ensity Residential) shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 25 .65.050 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS . (1) Minimum lot area: ~ 4,500 square feet ; (2) One single-family dwelling shall be pennitted per lot. Multiple dwellings shall be permitted based on the density standards in PMC 25.65.050(3); One dwelling unit per~ 4,500 square feet of lot area for single-family dwellings and 3 ,000 square feet of lot area for multiple-family dwellings and dwellings part of zero-l ot- line developments except as provided in PMC 25.60.030(8); (4) Maximum lot coverage: 60 percent ; (5) Minimum Yard Setbacks . (a) Front: 20 feet ; (b) Side: Five feet;. except in zero-lot-line developments in which case no side yard setback is reguired from the common lo t line(s), provided the remaining side yard is at least I 0 feet; (c) Rear. Principal building: Equal to the height of the dwelling; Accessory structures: Accessory structures adjacent an alley may be placed on the alley line provided there are no openings in the wall parallel to the alley. Garages with vehicle doors parallel to an alley shall be set back from the alley 20 feet. Where there is no alley , the setback shall be five feet. Structures related to rabbits and/or chicken hens, such as rabbit hutches and/or chicken coops, must be at least I 0 feet from any property line, may not exceed six feet in height and 30 square feet in size, and must be located behind the rear line of the dwelling. Rabbit hutches and/or chicken coops adjacent an alley may be placed within five feet of the alley line provided there are no openings in the wall parallel to the alley. Property owners shall not allow such structures to become a nuisance due to noise or odor. (6) Maximum Building H e ight. (a) Principal building: 35 feet, except a greater height may be approved by special pennit; (b) Accessory buildings: 15 feet ; (7) Fences and hedges: See Chapter 25 .180 PMC; (8) Parking: See Chapter 25.185 PMC; and (9) Landscaping: See Chapter 25.180 PMC; (10) Residential design standards: See PMC 25.165.100. [Ord. 4110 § 15, 2013; Ord. 4040 § 8, 2012 ; Ord. 4036 § 17, 2011; Ord. 3731 §16, 2005; Ord. 3354 § 2, 1999 ; Code 1970 § 25.36.050 .] Section 4. That section 25.70.050 of the Pasco Municipal Code (R-4 High Density Residential) shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 25.70.050 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. (I) Minimum lot area : ~ 4,000 square feet ; (2) One single-family dwelling shall be permitted per lot. Multiple dwellings shall be permitted based on the density standards in PMC 25.70.050(3); (3) Density: One dwelling unit per~ 4,000 square feet of lot area for single-family dwellings and 1,500 square feet of lot area for multiple-family dwellings and dwellings part of zero-lot-line developments; (4) Lot coverage : 60 percent; (5) Minimum Yard S etbacks. (a) Front: 20 feet ; (b) Side: Five feet t. except in zero-lot-line developments in which case no side yard setback is required from the common Jot line(s), provided the remaining side yard is at lea st 10 feet; (c) Rear: Principal building: Equal to the height of the dwelling; Accessory structures: Accessory structures adjacent an alley may be placed on the alley line provided there are no openings in the wall parallel to the alley. Garages with vehicle doors parallel to an alley shall be set back from the alley 20 feet. Where there is no alley, the setback shall be five feet. Structures related to rabbits and/or chicken h ens , such as rabbit hutches and/or chicken coops, must be at least 10 feet from any property line, may not exceed six feet in height and 30 square feet in si ze , and must be located behind the rear line of the dwelling. Rabbit hutches and/or chicken coops adjacent an alley may be placed within five feet of the alley line provided there are no openings in the wall parallel to the alley. Property owners shall not allow such structures to become a nuisance due to noise or odor. (6) Maximum Building H e ig ht. (a) Principal building: 35 feet , except a greater height may be approved by s pecial pem1it ; (b) Accessory buildings: 15 feet; (7) Fences and hedges: See Chapter 25.180 PMC; (8) Parking: See Chapter 25.185 PMC; (9) Landscaping: See Chapter 25.180 PMC; and (10) Res idential design standards: See PMC25.165.100. [Ord. 4110§16, 2013 ; Ord. 4040 § 9, 2012; Ord. 4036 § 19 , 2011; Ord. 3731 § 18 , 2005; Ord. 3354 § 2 , 19 99; Code 19 70 § 25 .38.050.] Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect fi ve days after passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Co uncil of the City of Pas co , Washington, and approved as pro v ided by law this __ day of , 2019 . Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kerr Law Group TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMO TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall -525 North Third Avenue -Council Chambers THURSDAY, JUNE 20th, 2019 7:00PM Planning Commission Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner Special Permit -Franklin County Museum Annex (SP2019-002) This report is to provide an update to the Planning Commission regarding the status of the Special Permit Application (SP2019-002) for a proposed construction of an annex for the Franklin County Museum . The proposed 3,500 square foot building is located on W Bonneville Street on a site currently zoned as R-3 (Medium Density Residential). The applicant (Franklin County Historical Society) is currently working to obtain a formal arrangement with the business to the south for the purpose of a shared parking agreement. This will allow users of the proposed annex to utilize existing available parking within close proximity of the site. Staff and the applicant are in agreement that continuing the public hearing will allow for the appropriate amount of time for a formal arrangement to be made regarding the shared parking and revised site plan. MOTION: RECOMMENDATION I move to continue the public hearing for the Special Permit on the proposed location of an annex building for the Franklin County Museum in the R-3 (Medium Density Resident ial) zoning district to the July 181h, 2019 Planning Commission meeting. 1 Reference Map Item: Special Permit -Museum Annex Building Applicant: Franklin County Historical Society File#: SP 2109-002 N W+E s DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM June 13 , 2019 Planning Commission Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator {)l!P 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ALLOCATION (MF# BGAP2019-003) Requests for Funding Attached for your review and consideration are the CDBG Fund and Proposal Summaries (Attachments 1 & 2) relating to our Community Development Block Grant Program for program year 2020 . Fourteen (14) requests for funds were submitted totaling $1,864,075. Applicants will present their proposals before the Planning Commission on June 21, 2019. No action is required of the Planning Commission at the June 21th meeting, only consideration of the applications is necessary. Estimated Funds Available It is estimated that the 2020 annual entitlement grant will be $1 ,040,552 based on the award for program year 2019. There is always some question regarding actual funding levels approved by Congress. Actual available funding for these FY 2020 activities will remain in question until the early part of the year when the CDBG allocation is made by Congressional Resolution. If funding levels are lower than estimated or eliminated the city will need to consider a number of options, including a voluntary or proportionate reduction of allocation, possible inclusions in the 2020 city general fund budget requests. If funding levels are higher than estimated, activity funding will be reallocated in accordance with the contingency plan according to the greatest need. Public Service Cap HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support public service activities may not exceed 15% of the combined total of the entitlement plus the prior year's program income. Based on the estimated entitlement of $1 ,040,552 , the maximum available for public service activities in 2020 is $105,000. Current requests for public services total $154,500. Planning & Administration Cap HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support planning and administration activities may not exceed 20% of the combined total of the entitlement plus the current year's program income. For 2020, the estimated entitlement of $1,040 ,552 makes the maximum available for planning and administration $140,000. Current requests for planning and administration total $140 ,000. Staff recommends a maximum of $140,000 for planning and administration (20%) due to the additional burden for HOME and NSP grant administration, and project delivery. No action from the Planning Commission is necessary. The Commission is expected to hear from the 2020 applicants and have the opportunity to ask questions. The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. Attachments: 1 2020 CDBG Fund Summary 2 2020 CDBG Proposal Summary 3 2020 CDBG Projects and Proposal Requested Attachment 1 2020 COBG Fund Summary BGAP2019-003 06.20.19 R1 Planning Commission Meeting Proposals-Recommendations PJIO I LOCI 0 RECIPIENT ACTIVITY I AGEN CY NAME Non COB G Matc h Agency Reauested PC I GoalStr at Recommend ob· 0001 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0002 0003 0004 0005 0005 0006 000 7 0008 1 + 01 City of Pasco-Community & Economic Development 02 City of Pasco-Administrative & Community Services 03 City of Pasco-Administrative & Community Services 04 City of Pasco-Administrative & Community Services OS YMCA 10 City of Pasco-Administr ative & Community Service s 12 The Arc of Tri-Cities 06 Downtown Pasco Development Authority 07 Ci ty of Pasco -Community & Economic Development 13 Franklin County Historical Society & Museu m 14 Ci t y of Pasco -Administrative & Community Services 08 City of Pasco -Community & Economic Development 11 City of Pas co-Pub li c Works & Engineer ing 09 City of Pasco -Community & Economic Development l Es t imated Entitlement 2020 Avail able to Commit 2019 Avail able to Commit 2018 f:vailable to Commit 2017 Ava ilable to Commit 20_1~6 __ _ Program I ncome (Convert NSP to CDBG for <50%AMI) Funds available for Commitment Propos al s Received SURPLUS/DEFICIT Proposals Recommended Funds une nc umberd CDBG Program Administration (HOME and NSP} Civic Center -Youth Recreation Specialist Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist Martin Luther King Recreation Programs Recreation Scholarship Program Theraputic Re creation Program Scholarship Pa sco Specia lty Kitchen Tech nical Assistance CHIP Owner Occupied M inor Rehabilitation Heritage Demonstration Garden & Parking PSK Facility Improvements-Hood Expansion Project Code Enforcement Officer Downtown Physical Improvements SECTI ON 108 -DEBT REPAYMEN T Reprogram to Revitalization 2020 Reprogram to Revitalization 2020 Reprogram to Rehabilitation 2020 $20,488.00 $140,000.00 $49,375 .00 $37,500.00 $71,500.00 $37,500.00 $198,739.00 $3 7,500.00 $35,000.00 $20,000.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 $20,000.00 $9,000.00 $69,868.00 $119,575.00 $115,000.00 $7,500.00 $45,000.00 $50,000.00 $150,000.00 $220,000.00 $70,000.00 $700,000.00 $875,000.00 $200,000.00 1,444,470.00 1 ,864,075 .00 $ --t-$ t s $ $ $ $ 700 ,000 200.000 60,084 J 80,468 1,040 ,552 1,864 ,07 5 (82 3,523 ~ 1,040,552 ~CAP 15% CAP --,- All Risk 2 Attachment 1 Page 1 Priority 0 CITY OF PASCO 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY -JUNE 20, 2019 1 CDBG Program Administration -Requested: $140,000 CDBG funds provide for salary and benefits for the Block Grant Administrator to plan, administer and provide for the successful delivery of housing, community development and economic activities. The City receives funds for CDBG, HOME and NSP activities. The Block Grant Administrator ensures compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and law s for programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people in Pasco. 2 Civic Center Recreation Specialist -Requested: $37,500 CDBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Civic Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for at risk youth and families in the immediate service area. 3 Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist-Requested: $37,500 CDBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Martin Luther King Center. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Anny and Campfire USA , who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to school age children and families in the Kurtzman neighborhood service area. 4 Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist -Requested: $37,500 CDBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly of Pasco with support services, nutrition, health and living skills support. 5 YMCA Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Program -Requested: $20,000 CDBG funds provide YMCA recreation programs at the Martin Luther King Center. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Anny and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to school age children and their families. 10 Pasco Recreation Scholarship Fund -Requested: $ 8,000 CDBG funds provide funds to help low-income youth participate in recreation programs. CITY OF PASCO 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY -JUNE 20, 2019 12 Arc Theraputic Recreation Scholarship Fund -Requested: $ 9,000 CDBG funds provide funds to help disabled adults participate in recreation programs. 6 Pasco Specialty Kitchen Technical Assistance -Requested: $119,575 CDBG funds provide for wages, salaries and benefits for Technical Assistance at the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, a certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical assistance to small startup food-related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improv es their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals . In cons ideration for technical assistance, the startup businesses agree to create and/o r make jobs av a ilable to 14 low-to-moderate income persons. 7 CHIP Minor Rehab Program -Requested: $115,000 CDBG funds provide minor rehabilitation, emergency repairs and/or construction of wheelchair ramps or bathroom accessibility remodels for very low to low income households. This population includes frail , elderly and disabled (City-wide). It is estimated that 3 households, typically very low income will be assisted. 13 Heritage Demonstration Garden & Parking-Requested: $45,000 CDBG funds are requested for facility improvements at the Fanklin County Historical Society Museum. Facility improv ements include Heritage Demonstration Garden and site preparation for paved parking lot at the new Annex building 14 Certified Commercial Kitchen Facility Rehabilitation -Kitchen Expansion - Requested: $150,000 CDBG funds are requested for facility improvements at the Pasco Specialty Kitchen . Facility improvements include redesign of the kitchen area to reconfigure hood space and add one additional kitchen. 8 Code Enforcement Officer -Requested: $70,000 CDBG funds provide a portion of the s alary and benefits for one of five code enforcement officers to help bring approximately 520 properies into compliance with City codes. Code enforcement encourages property owners to maintain housing units to minimum property standards and improves neighborhood appearance in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts 201 , 202, 203 , 204 and 206). 2 CITY OF PASCO 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY -JUNE 20, 2019 11 Pasco Neighborhood Business District Improvements -Requested: $865,000 Additional CDBG funds are requested for pedestrian safety and disability access improvements to downtown Pasco Nieghborhood Business District in the Vicinity of 4th and Lewis Streets between 2nd and 4th, and Clark and Columbia. 9 SECTION 108 -DEBT REPAYMENT -Requested: $200,000 CDBG funds are requested for continuing the multi-year Peanuts Park restoration project Phase 3 design documents. Funds are used to redesign the community park which includes the Farmer's Market Pavilion, construction includes replacement of existing curb , gutter, sidewalk, accessibility improvements, and replacement of aging water/sewer lines. 3 CITY OF PASCO 2019 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY -JUNE 20, 2019 11 Pasco Neighborhood Business District Improvements -Requested: $865,000 Additional CDBG funds are requested for pedestrian safety and disability access improvements to downtown Pasco Nieghborhood Business District in the Vicinity of 4th and Lewis Streets between 2nd and 4th, and Clark and Columbia. 9 SECTION 108-DEBT REPAYMENT-Requested: $200,000 CDBG funds are requested for continuing the multi-year Peanuts Park restoration project Phase 3 design documents. Funds are used to redesign the community park which includes the Farmer's Market Pavilion, construction includes replacement of existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, accessibility improvements, and replacement of aging water/sewer lines. 3 2020 Projects and A ctivities -Requ ested 0001 Project A dministration A ctivity A ctivity 01 C DB G Prog ra m Administration GoalStratObj: All Matrix/Citation 21A 570.206 Prog ram Ad ministration StrategyDesc: Prog ram Ad mini stration Nat Objective Obj Outcome N /R 570 .205 S LE A vaila bil ity/Acces s ibility S UM Proposed 79156 $140,000.00 R equested $1 40,000.00 Table3Des c : C DBG funds provide for salary a nd b enefits for th e Bl ock Grant Adminis trator to plan , admi ni st er and prov ide for th e s uccess ful deli very of ho us ing , community d evelopment a nd economic activities. The City rece ives funds for CDBG , HOM E and NS P acti vit ies . The Bl ock G ra nt Adm i nistrator ensures com pl ianc e wit h local, st ate and federal rules, regulat ion s and laws for program s th at primaril y benefi t low to moderate income people in Pasco . 0002 Public S e rvices Activity Activity 02 Civic Center Rec reation Sp ecial ist M a t rix/Citation 05Z 570.201 (e) N at Objective LMA 5 70 .208(a)(1) GoalStratObj: 3 Hom eless in terve ntions and prevention , and s upportive services Obj Outcom e SLE Avail abi lity/Accessib ili ty S UM Proposed 32600 StrategyD esc: Focus o n the basic living needs of lower-in come households a nd in dividuals by address ing one or more priority populati ons and needs. $149,500.00 R equest e d $37 ,500.00 Table3Desc: CD BG fun ds p rovide a portion of th e salary and benefits fo r recrea ti on spec ia lis t at the Ci vi c C enter. Th is facility's prog ram is to provide recreatio n prog ram s for at risk yo uth and families in the immedi ate service area . 03 Martin Lu t her King Community Center Recreati on Sp ecial ist 05Z 570.201 (e) LM A 57 0.20 8(a)(1) GoalStratObj: 3 Homeless interventions and p revention , and supportive servi c es SL E Ava ilab il ity/Accessibil ity 58950 StrategyD esc: Focus on the basic living needs of lower-i ncome households and individuals by add ressing one or more priority po pulations and needs. $37 ,500.00 Table3Desc: CDB G fund s pro vi de a porti on o f th e salary an d benefit s fo r rec reation specialist at the Martin Luther King Cen ter. This fa ci lity's progra m is coordinated with the YM CA, Salvation Arm y and Campfi re USA , who all colla borate to provide edu cation and phys ical activities to school age c hi ldren and famil ies i n th e Kurtzman neig hborhood servi ce a rea. 04 Senior Citizen 's Center Recreation S pec ialis t 0 5A 570.201 (e) LMC 570 .20 8(a)(2 ) GoalStratObj: 3 Homeless interventions and prevention, and su ppo rt ive services S LE Availabil ity /Ac cessi bilit y 1000 StrategyD esc: Focus on the basic livi ng needs of lower-income households and individuals by add ressing one or more priority population s and needs. $37 ,500 .00 Table3Desc: CDB G fu nds provide a porti on of the salary and benefits fo r recreati on spec ialist to oversee an d operate prog ram at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program pro vides su pervisi on and leaders hip necessa ry fo r program s se rv ing the elderly of Pas co wi th support services , nut rition , heal th and livi ng skills s upport . Thursday , Jun e 13, 2019 N onCDBG $20,488.00 Non CDBG $49,375 .00 $7 1,5 00.00 $198,739 .00 Page I of 4 05 YMCA Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Program 05Z 570.201(e) LMA 570.208(a)(1) Goa/StratObj: 3 Homeless interventions and prevention, and supportive services SLE Availability/Accessibility 58950 StrategyDesc: Focus on the basic livi ng needs of lower-income households and ind ividuals by addressing one or more pri ori ty populations and needs. $20,000.00 Table3Desc: CDBG funds provide YMCA recreation prog rams at the Martin Luther King Center. This faci lity's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to school age children and their famil ies. 10 Pasco Recreation Scholarship Fund 050 570.201 (e) LMC 570.208(a)(2) Goa/StratObj: 3 Homeless interventions and prevention , and supportive services SLE Affordability 230 StrategyDesc: Focus on the basic living needs of lower-income households and individuals by addressing one or more priority populations and needs. Table3Desc: CDBG funds provide funds to help low-income youth participate in recreation programs. 12 Arc Theraput ic Recreation Scholarship Fund 056 570.201 (e) LMC 570.208(a)(2) Goa/StratObj: 3 Homeless interventions and prevention , and supportive services SLE Availability/Accessibility 20 StrategyDesc: Focus on the basic living needs of lower-income households and individuals by addressing one or m ore priority populations and needs. Table3Desc: CDBG funds provide funds to help disabled adults participate in recreation programs . 0003 Economic Opportunities Activity Activity 06 Pasco Specialty Kitchen Technical Assistance M atri.x/Citation 186 570.203(b) Nat Objective LMJ 570 .208(a)(4) Goa/StratObj: 2 Co mmunity, neighborhood & economic development StrategyDesc: Support businesses that create permanent jobs for lower-income residents . Obj Outcome EO Availability/Accessibility SUM Proposed 15 $8,000.00 $9,000 .00 $119,575.00 R equested $119 ,575 .00 Table3Desc: CDBG funds provide for wages, sala ries and benefits for Technical Assistance at the Pasco Specialty Kitchen , a certified commercial incubator kitchen . By providi ng technical assistance to small startup food-related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance, the startup businesses agree to create and/or make jobs available to 14 low-to-moderate income perso ns. Thursday, June 13, 2019 $35,000.00 $2,000.00 $20,000.00 No11CDBG $69,868.00 Page 2of4 0004 Decent Housing Activity Activity Matrix/Citation Nat Objective 07 CHIP Minor Rehab Program 14A 570 .202 LMH 570.208(a)(3) GoalStratObj: 1 Increase and preserve affordable housing choices Obj Outcome DH Affordability SUM Proposed 2 $115,000.00 Requested $115 ,000 .00 StrategyDesc: Sustain or improve the quality of existing affordable housing stock. (Support acquisition or rehabilitation , code enforement , energy efficiency improvements, or new construction in targeted neighborhoods.) Table3Desc: CDBG funds provide minor rehabilitation , emergency repairs and/or co nstruction of wheelchair ramps or bathroom accessibility remodels for very low to low income households. This population includes frail, elderly and disabled (Ci ty-wide). It is estimated that 3 household s, typically very low income will be assisted . 0005 Public Facilility Improvements Activity Activity 13 Heritage Demonstration Garden & Parking Matrix/Citation 14E 570.202 Nat Objective LMA 570 .208(a)(1) GoalStratObj: 2 Community, neighborhood & economic development Obj Outcome EO Sustainability SUM Proposed 32 $195,000.00 Requested $45 ,000.00 StrategyDesc: Support the revitalization of neighborhoods by improving and supporting public facilities that serve low-and moderate-income neighborhoods and households. Table3Desc: CDBG funds are requested for facil ity improvements at the Fan klin County Historical Society Museum . Facility improvements include Heritage Demonstration Ga rd en and site preparation for paved parking lot at the new Annex building 14 Certified Commercial Kitchen Faci lity Rehabilitation -Kitchen Expansion 14E 570.202 LMC 570.208(a)(2) GoalStratObj: 2 Community, neighborhood & economic development EO Sustainability 25 $150,000 .00 StrategyDesc: Support the revitali zation of neighborhoods by improving and supporting public facilities that serve low-and moderate-income neighborhoods and households. Table3Desc: CDBG funds are requested for facility improvements at the Pasco Specialty Kitchen. Facility improvements include redesign of th e kitchen area to reconfigure hood space and add one additional kitchen. 0006 Code Enforcement Activity Activity Matrix/Citation Nat Objective 08 Code Enforcement Officer 15 570.202(c) LMA 570 .208(a)(1) GoalStratObj: 1 Increase and preserve affordable hou sing choices Obj Outcome SLE Sustainability S UM Proposed 500 $70,000.00 Requested $70,000.00 StrategyDesc: Sustain or improve the qual ity of existing affordable housing stock . (Support acquisition or rehabilitation , code enforement, energy efficiency improvements, or new constru ctio n in targeted neighborhoods.) Table3Desc: C DBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for one of five code enforcement officers to help bring approximately 520 properies into compliance with City codes. Code enforcement encourages property owners to maintain housing units to minimum property standard s and improves neighborhood appearance in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts 201, 202, 203, 204 and 206). Thursday, Jun e 13, 2019 No11CDBG NonCDBG $7,500.00 $50,000.00 NonCDBG $220,000 .0 0 Page3 o/4 0007 Community Infrastructure Activity Activity 11 Pasco Neighborhood Business District Improvements Matrix/Citation 03L 570 .201 (c) Nat Objective LMA 570 .208(a)(1) Goa/StratObj: 2 Community, neighborhood & economic development Obj Outcome SLE Sustainability StrategyDesc: Improve access for persons with disabilities and the elderly by improving streets and sidewalk systems. SUM Proposed 10060 $875,000.00 Requested $875 ,000 .00 Table3Desc: Additional CDBG funds are requested for pedestrian safety and disability access improvements to downtown Pasco Nieghborhood Business District in the Vicinity of 4th and Lewis Streets between 2nd and 4th, and Clark and Columbia. 0008 Neighborhood Revitalization Activity Activity 09 SECTION 108 ·DEBT REPAYMENT Matrix/Citation 19F 570.206 Nat Objective LMA 570 .208(a)(1 ) Goa/StratObj: 2 Community, neighborhood & economic development Obj Outcome SLE Availability /Accessibility SUM Proposed 29295 $200,000.00 Requested $200 ,000 .00 StrategyDesc: Support the revitalization of neighborhoods by impro ving and supporting public facilities that serve low-and moderate-income neighborhoods and households. Table3Desc: CDBG funds are reque sted for continuing the multi-year Peanuts Park restoration project Phase 3 design documents. Funds are used to redesign the community park which includes the Farmer's Market Pavilion , construction in cludes replacement of existing curb , gutter, sidewalk, accessibility improvements, and repla c ement of aging water/sewer lines. $1,864,075.00 Thursday, June 13, 2019 NonCDBG $700 ,000 .00 NonCDBG $0.00 $1,444,470.00 Page4 of4 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 13, 2019 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administratoract:> SUBJECT: Background 2020 HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL WORK PLAN (MF# BGAP2019-004) Pas co entered into a HOME Consortium Agreement with Richland and Kennewick in 1996 making the City eligible for Federal HOME funds . The Agreement was renewed through 2023. Each year an annual action plan is required to be prepared and submitted to HUD for use of estimated funds for the following program year. Estimated Funds Available It is estimated that the 2020 annual entitlement grant to the HOME Consortium will be $430,000. Each member city is allocated an equal share of the entitlement after 10% Set-Aside for Administration and 15 % Set-Aside for Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO). Pasco 's share of the entitlement is estimated to be $107 ,000 when the remaining funds are split equally between the three cities. HOME Program income estimated in 2020 is $100,000 and may be used for Down Payment Assistance or an Eligible CHDO Project depending on need. These estimates are based on the 2019 HOME Allocation. There is always some question regarding actual funding levels approved by Congress . Actual available funding for these FY 2020 activities will remain in question until the early part of the year when the HOME allocation is made by Congressional Resolution and an amendment to the Annual Action Plan my be necessary. If funding levels are lower than estimated, activity funding may need to be reallocated accordingly. Any program income received may be allocated for eligible down payment assistance or CHDO development projects. Planning & Administration HUD regulations state that the amount of HOME Funds obligated within a program year to support planning and administration activities may not exceed 10% of the entitlement. This is awarded to Richland annually as the Lead Agency of the HOME Consortium to manage all activities. Member cities are provided funds for planning and administration from 10% of program income received from completed projects within their jurisdiction. CHDO Set-Aside Each year a minimum of 15% of the entitlement grant mu st be set-aside to help Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO) add to the permanent affordable housing stock . The CHDO set- aside funds may be combined with program income for a development project that will be selected through a competitive RFP process. Proposed Activities HOME funds are based on need and income eligibility and may be used a nywhere within the city limits, however, nei g hborhoods designated as priority by Pasco City Council receive first consideration. Funding is first targeted in the Longfellow and Museum neighborhoods, then within low-moderate in come censu s tracts (20 I , 202, 203 and 204). If HOME fund s cannot be applied to those areas, then they are u sed as needed within the Pasco City limits for the benefit of eligible low-moderate inc ome families. PY 2020 Funding Sources Budget Units 2020 Entitlement & Estimated Program Income $ 207,000.00 $ 207 ,000.00 2020 Proposed Activities 2020 R estricted for Administration $ 10 ,000.00 2020 Downpayment Assistance (up to 20% of purcha se) $ 181,000.00 4 2020 Closing Costs (up to $4,000) $ 16 ,000.00 $ 207,000.00 4 Recommendations After discuss ion s and staff evaluation, it is recomm ended that anticipated 2020 HOME entitlement funds be allocated to the First Time Homebuye r Down P ayment Ass istance Program. A contingent project for new construction infill or tenant based rental assistance should also be added if needed to meet timeliness. The activities set fo1th above would best meet the City's Consolidated Pl a n and be mo st effective in carrying out the objectives for the City in 2020. If conditions of the housing market make it difficult to use funds as planne d , Pasco may consider joining force s with Kennewic k and Richland t o allocate unu sed fund s for C HDO acquisition and/or infrastructure for low-income rental housing projects as pennitted in the interlocal agreement. Your review and rec ommendation to the C it y Counci l would be appreciated. /arp DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Background MEMORANDUM June 13 , 2019 Planning Commission Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator ClJP 2020 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM (NSP) ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL WORK PLAN (MF# BGAP2019-005) The City received a total of $426 ,343 in CDBG funding for the Neighborhood Stabi lization Program through 20 I 0. The City has recovered 16 foreclosed properties to date , more than double the estimated amount. Down payment assistance has been provided to 12 homebuyers , three are below 50 % of median income which accounts for 43% of the funds used . The City has also purchased and rehabilitated four homes , which have been so ld to income eligible households . Estimated Funds Available As a subrecipient under Commerce's Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSPl), City of Pasco has requests to transfer program income from NSPl [08 -F6401-014] to its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program as authorized by the Notice of Neighborhood Stabilization Program: Changes to C loseout Requirements related to Program Income (Program Income Notice) published in the Federal Register on June 14, 2016 (81 FR 38730). The NSPI program income specified in this request was generated under the Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting (DRGR) system activity numbers (03-8009, 04-8009 & 09-8009) As of December 31, 2018 , City of Pasco shows N SP 1 program income on hand in the amount of $80,468. This amount represents all NSP 1 program income less allocated NSP1 expenses collected since the grant close out. The program Of this amount, we are requesting to transfer $80,468 ofNSPl program income from DRGR to the Integrated Disbursement Information (IDIS) system for receipt to the CDBG program as program income. As required, City of Pasco has used 27% of its NSP2 grant and program income to assist households whose incomes are less than 50% of the area median income (the LH25 set-aside requirement). City of Pasco requests continued authorization to transfer future NSPl program income into the City 's CDBG entitlement program on a program year basis. The City will include all NSP l program income transferred to its CDBG program in its annual action plan to HUD. In addition, all transferred NSP 1 program income will be subject to applicable CDBG requirements as further specified in the Program Income Notice. Proposed Activities Staff proposes the funds be used to provide owner occupied rehabilitation for up to three household located in target areas in the low-moderate census tracts (201 , 202, 203 , and 204) per below : PY 2020 Funding Sources 2018 Program Income Remaining (SF425, 12/31/18) 2020 Proposed Activities 2020 Restricted for Administration 2020 Down Payment Assistance/Minor Rehab 2020 Down Payment Assistance/Minor Rehab **25% (LH25 Set-Aside) Recommendations Budget $ 80,468.00 $ 80,468.00 $ $ $ $ 8,017.00 24,000.00 48,451.00 80,468.00 Units 2 3 After discussions and staff evaluation, it is recommended that the activities set forth in above would best meet the City's Consolidated Plan and be most effective in carrying out the objectives for the City in 2020. A contingent project may be added if funds are not able to be used as planned. NSP program income may be converted to CDBG program income and used for eligible affordable housing projects. Your review and recommendation to the City Council would be appreciated. /arp ..J 1 1~ Pif'Sco MEMO TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall -525 North Third Avenue -Council Chambers THURSDAY, JUNE 20, 2019 7:00PM TO: FROM : Planning Comm iss ion Darcy Bourcier, Planner I SUBJECT: Increasing Building Height in the R-3 & R-4 Zoning Di strict s (CA 2019-009) To accommodate Pa sco 's fo reca st ed population growth in a limited Urban Growth Area (UGA}, Plann i ng staff b eliev e it nece ssa ry to rework zoning provi sion s specifically within medium and high den sity re sidential zoning di stricts. Below is a table showing the current building height standard of dwellings in R-3 (Medium Den sity Re sidential) and R-4 (High Den sity Residential) zonin g districts: City of Pasco (current standard) R-3 (Medium R-4 (High Density Density Residential) Residential) Max dwelling 35 feet 3 5 feet height With th e UGA under scrutiny for a proposed ex p an sion, the potenti al for low-den sity r es idential sprawl is probl em at ic. To h elp mitiga te thi s potentia l and provid e more opportunity for hou sin g units, th e following revis ion s h ave be en proposed : R-3 Zone : Increase m ax imum dwelling height to 40 feet (m easured to midpoint of gable), and allow for a grea t er dwe lling height vi a Special Permit R-4 Zone : Increase m ax imum dwe lling h eight to 45 f eet (m eas ured to midpoint of gable), and allow for a grea t er dwelling h eight vi a Sp eci al Permit It should b e noted that the definition of "building hei ght" accordin g to th e Zo ning Code is "[ ... ] the vertical dist anc e from g rade pl ane to the average he ight of the highest roof surface[ ... ]". Below i s a simplified representation of this provision . Midpoint of highest roof surface 1 For example, according to current provisions, a building in an R-4 zoning district is permitted at 35 feet to the midpoint of the gable, but the resulting height to the peak of the building is 40 feet (plus or minus). Thus, if the proposed code revisions are adopted, a building in an R-4 zone will be permitted at 45 feet to the midpoint, and around 50 feet to the peak. Both Richland and Kennewick permit dwelling heights in excess of what Pasco currently permits, at least in their versions of the R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning district . City of Richland R-25 (Medium R-3 (Multiple- Density Family Residential) Residential) Max dwelling 30 feet 40 feet height *Dwelling height is measured to midpoint of highest roof surface (same as PMC) City of Kennewick RM (Medium RH {High Density Density Residential) Residential) Max dwelling 35 feet 45 feet height *Dwelling height is measured to highest point on roof Richland and Kennewick measure this distance differently; however, these measurements result in comparable dwelling height due to the height of the average gable. Should the proposed standard be adopted, the City of Pasco will permit the tallest buildings in the Tri-Cities MSA (at least in the R-4 zoning district). Planning staff has discussed this proposed code revision with the Fire Marshal/Building Official regarding any building implications by increasing building height, and no contradictions with the International Building Code or other adopted codes have arisen . It should be noted that because the rear setback of a dwelling in an R-3 or R-4 zoning district must be at least equal to the dwelling height (as shown above), the rear setback in these zones will increase proportionally. This item has been advertised as a public hearing. A draft Ordinance has been attached for review and discussion. Based on discussion, it may be appropriate to continue the hearing if necessary. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed code amendment and set July 18, 2019 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. 2 Exhibit #1 0.5 1 All Parcels Zoned R-3 or R-4 File#: CA2019-009 2 Mile \, ~/·,;,; I ~ 1.1·1~{JgG/~ ~ W+E s Parcels zoned R-3 Parcels zoned R-4 ~ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PMC TITLE 25 TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM DWELLING HEIGHT IN R-3 AND R-4 ZONING DISTRICTS WHEREAS, cities have the responsibility to regulate and control physical development within their borders and to ensure public health, safety and welfare are maintained ; and, WHEREAS, the regulations must be driven by conformance with State and local law that protect public interest, health and safety; and, WHEREAS, to accommodate Pasco 's forecasted population growth in a limited Urban Growth Area , City staff believe increasing the maximum dwelling height in the medium and high density zoning districts will facilitate housing development; and , WHEREAS, no conflicts with the a dopted International Building Code or any other adopted loca l or State law have arisen or are anticipated; and , WHEREAS, in order to provide for the health, safety, and welfare of the community by regulating building height the City Council hereby approves the reco mmendation of the Planning Commission to amend the City of Pasco Municipal Code; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Pasco Municipal code 25.65.050 (R-3 Medium Density Residential District) shall be amended as follows: 25.65.050 Development Standards (6) Maximum Building H eight. (a) Principal building: ;MO feet , except a greater height may be approved by special permit; Section 2. That Pasco Municipal code 2 5.7 0.050 (R-4 High Density Residential District) shall be amended as follows: 25.65.050 Development Standards (6) Maximum Building H eig ht. (a) Principal building: ;MS feet , except a greater height may be approved by special pennit; Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as required by law . PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco , Washington, and approved as provided by law this __ day of , 2019. MF# CA 2019-009 Page 1of2 Matt W atkins, Mayor ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk Kerr Law Group MF# CA 2019-009 Page 2 of 2 I I n~tys'~ r.o .. Ii ru ~ MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall -525 North Third Avenue -Council Chambers DATE: THURSDAY, June 20th, 2019 7:00 PM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MF# CA2019-010-Planned Unit Development Revisions A Planned Unit Development (PUD) is both a type of development and a regulatory process. PUDs are identified in the Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) in title 25.140 with the purpose of providing opportunitie s for innovation, creativity and flexibility for land development within the city. PUDs can include a variety of housing types and are often maintained by a homeowner's association . In addition to the housing types, the benefit of PUDs is that they can offer amenities such as open space, parks and gathering space s for the homeowners within the development. As identified in the PMC, PUD s are exempt from certain design standards and requirements including: minimum lot size and setbacks. While the code currently allows for flexibility, the minimum site area requirement of ten acres (PMC 25.140.030) i s prohibitive of where the PUD ordinance can actually be applied. In 2017, city staff presented to the Planning Comm is sion on the ope n space requirements for a Planned Unit Development. The PMC currently requires that each PUD shall provide not less than 35 perce nt of the gro ss land for common open space (PMC 25.140.080(5)). As with the minimum site requirement, staff believe s the open space requirement of 3 5 percent is overly burden some and detracts from the PUD ordinance mis sion to provide flexible and creative approach to development opportunities within the city. Staff ha s provided the following analysis and proposed code amendments to the Planned Unit Development requirements for your review. Analysis -Minimum Site Area Requirement The table below includes the minimum site area required by jurisdiction s of varying size s. Jurisdiction Minimum Site Area City of Kenn ewick (WA) 5 Acres City of Olympi a (WA) None City of Vancouver (WA) None City of Spokane (WA) None City of Yakima (WA) 2 Acre s Table I -Mi 11i11111111 Sile Area Compa ris on The City of Pa sco requirement of a minimum of ten acre s is twice the size of our neighboring jurisdiction (Kennewick). Becau se of the cont inued residential growth, staff believe s the city requirement for site area should be reduced to align more closely between other large cities in Washington. The City Comprehensive Plan identifies four land-use classification s that permit re sidential development. Aligning the site requirement to correlate with the intended goals and uses of each land use classification would allow a PUD to be utilized while remaining consistent with the underlying residential zoning district. The current PMC exempts a PUD from variou s design standards and requirements, intended to promote its utilization however additional parameters should be included to ensure that the PUD is developed to meet the goals and policies of each land-use classification. The table below provides a breakdown of proposed minimum site area, units and ma x imum lot sizes for each land-use classification within the Comprehensive Plan . Land-Use Cla ssification Minimum Minimum Site Maximum Lot Density Units Area {Acres} Size Bonus Low Den sity Residential 6 1 7 ,300 20% Mixed Re sidential 12 None 3,600 20% High Density Residential 20 None 2,200 30% Mixed Residential/Commercial 20 None 2,200 30% Table 2-Proposed Minimum Site Area Req11 ireme111sfor PUDs Minimum Units: Minimum number of hou sing units required Minimum Site Area : Minimum site area (acre s) required for a PUD per each land-u se clas sification Maximum Lot Site: Max imum lot size, to encourage efficient use of land and promote infill Density Bonus : The ba se density of a PUD is established for each underlying land- u se cla ssification in the Comprehensive Plan . The Density Bonus (currently 20% for all) would permit the Planning Commission and City Council to authorize a density not more than the identified value from table 2. An additional table below is provided as an ex ample of possible PUD applications. Table 3 calculates the number of po ss ible lots created by dividing the size of the PUD area by the maximum lot size. PUD Example Area (Acres) Maximum Lot Size Lots Created Low Density Re sidential 2.5 7,300 12 .10 Mixed Residential 1 3,600 12.10 High Density Residential 0.5 2,200 9.90 Mixed Re sidential I Commercial 2.5 2,200 49.50 Table 3-P U D Examples 2 For reference, the table below i s from the current Comprehensive Plan and identifies land-use classifications with dwelling unit density. Land-Use Classification Dwelling Units/ Acre Low Density Residential 2 -5 Mixed Residential 5-20 High Density Residential 29 + Mixed Residential I Commercial 29 + Table 4-Tobie LU-3 -Land Use Designations & Criteria (2008 Comprelu•nsil'e Plan) Analysis -Open Space Requirement The PUD ordinance is a tool provided to allow for flexibility in the land development code . In exchange for this flexibility, the PUD was to provide a minimum percentage of open space for those residing within the development. The current requirement of 35 % can create a challenge for the utilization of the PUD ordinance . Jurisdiction Open Space Requirement City of Kennewick (WA) 15% City of Vancouver (WA) 10% City of Spok ane (WA) 10% Table 5 -Ope n Space Requirement Comparison Staff i s proposin g to clearly define Open Space and reduce the requirement from 35% to 15%. Suggested wording for the definition of Open Space is as follows : Each PUD shall dedicate not le ss than 15% of the gro ss land available for common open space for the use of its residents. Common open space shall be entirely within the PUD and where all dwelling units have legal acce ss to the proposed space at the time of final approval. Required common open space may include p edestrian walkways, parkland op en area s, bridle path s, land scaped drainage ways and land scaped detention basin s, swimming pool s, clubhou ses , playfields and/or court s and golf courses. The area proposed for common open space shall be dedicated in common to the owners within the development. Maintenance and operation of the dedicated open space shall be the respon sibility of the property owners or homeowner's ass ociation . RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to continue th e public hearing on the revisions to the Planned Unit Development ordinance to the July 1gth , 2019 Planning Commis sion Meeting. 3 I I n~tys1'{ ""'0 -.,r ra" MEMORANDUM TO PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall -525 North Third Avenue -Council Chambers DATE: THURSDAY, June 20th, 2019 7:00 PM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jacob B. Gonzalez, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MF# CA2019-011-Street Improvements (RS-12 & RS -2 0) City staff and Council have placed an increase d emphasis on providing a more connected transportation network over the past years . Recent changes to the Pasco Municipal Code to promote infill development for housing has also increased the need for our tran sportation infrastructure to meet improved standards. As the city works to coordinate land use and transportation (infrastructure), additional refinements are necessary. In 2018, the Pasco City Council adopted the Complete Streets Policy (PMC 12.15). The purpose of the policy is to consider all users of the right-of-way in the planning, design, construction and operation in city transportation projects. Currently, our RS-12 and RS-20 zoning di stricts do not require street improvements to be made as lots are developed. While these two zones are our lowest residential density zoning districts, they represent 15% of the city and 35% of residentially zoned land . The lack of a requirement has decreased the connectivity and efficiency of our transportation network and increased the need to address inadequate sta nd ard s of the adjacent infrastructure. The city require s appropriate street improvements to be made in all other zoning di stricts at the time of development. Additionally, many regional, state and federal partner agencie s encourage and/or require street improvements citing their benefits on safety, mobility and funding opportunities. The AARP states that safe, accessible, and well-ma intained si dewalks are a fundamental community investment that enhances health and plays a vital role in community life. The United States Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration have produced guides and studies on the benefits of a well-co nnected tran sportation network. Locally, the Benton- Franklin Council of Governments, Ben Franklin Transit and the Wa shington State Department of Tran sportation have goals and policies aimed at incre as ing mobility options in our communities within their long-range plan s. Staff ha s prepared the code amendments (attached) to the Pa sco Municipal Code for your consideration. RECOMMEN DA Tl ON MOTION: I move to close the public hearing on the proposed code amendment regarding Street Improvements in RS -12 and RS -20 zoning districts and set the July 18t h as the date for deliberation s and the recommendation for City Council. 2 Legend Applicable Zones (RS-12 & RS-20) CJ City Limits CJ Pasco Urban Growth Boundary Buffer Distance (0 .25mi) Applicable Zones (RS-12 & RS-20) c:J City Limits c:J Pasco Urban Growth Boundary N A ,, ORDINANCE NO. __ _ AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington Relating to Street Improvement Requirements for RS-12 and RS-20 Residential Zoning Districts and Amending the Pasco Municipal Code WHEREAS, in 2018, the Pasco City Council approved Ordinance 4389 creating Chapter 12.15, adopting a Complete Streets Policy within the City of Pasco; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is committed to the safety and health of its residents and visitors; and WHEREAS, the development of a more complete transportation network can improve pedestrian safety, increase mobility options for residents and visitors and promote improvements in public health; and WHEREAS, the City does not require all street improvements to be made at the time of development in the RS-12 and RS-20 residential zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the City requires street improvements during the time of development or redevelopment in all other zoning districts; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer shall review and ensure adeq u ate prov1s1ons are in conformance with city standards and specifications per PMC 21.40.070(2)(b); and WHEREAS, RS-12 and RS-20 zoning districts comprise 35% of all residentially zoned land within the City; and WHEREAS, improvements to the transportation network are necessary to keep up with the added population growth of the City; and WHEREAS, Policy TR-1-F of the Comprehensive Plan calls for the development of an interconnected network of streets, trails and other public access ways; and WHEREAS, Policy TR -2-D of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the greater use of multi- modal transportation by providing safe and purposeful bicycle and pedestrian routes WHEREAS, the 2011 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan states that the absence of concurrency requirements in RS-12 and RS-20 zones is a barrier to the goa l s of the plan and recommended the revision to the PMC ; and WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council recognized the promotion of a highly-functional, multi- modal transportation network as a City Council Goal. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 . That Section 12.04.080 of the Pasco Municipal Code is amended to remove the stricken language : 12.04.080 Optional standards for the R S 20 and RS 12 districts. Within the R S 20 and R S 12 zoning districts, the installation of side·1talk, curb , gutters and street lights shall not be a mandatory permit requirement for ne·A' construction, but rather may be installed at the option of the developer. [Ord . 2972 § G, 1993; Code 1970 § 12.04 .080.] Section 2 . That Section 12.3 6 .050 ofthe Pasco Municipal Code is amended to remove the stricken language : 12.3 6.050 Concurrency de ve lopment standards. (1) Street Improvements. (e) Curbs , gutters, sidewalks and street lights are not required in RS 12 or RS 20 residential zones , but may be installed at the option of the developer. Section 3. That Se ction 21.15.030 of the Pasco Municipal Code is amended to remove the stricken language: 21.15.030 Street improvements. (S) Curbs , gutters, sidewalks and street lights are not required in RS 12 or RS 20 residential zones , but rnay be installed at the option of the developer. [Ord . 3398 § 2, 1999; Code 1970 § 26.12.030.] Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after pas sage and publication as required by the law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pa sc o, and approved as provided by law thi s ___ day of , 2019. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST : APPROVED AS TO FORM : City Cler k City Attorney TRANSIT June 5, 2019 Pasco Planning Commission 525 N. Third Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 1000 Columbia Park Trail, Richland, WA 99352 509.735.4131 I 509.735.1800/ax I www.bft.org RECEIVED JUN 1 3 2019 COMMUN IT Y & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN1 Re: MF# CA2019-011 -Street Improvements to RS-12 and RS-20 Residential Zoning Dear Planning Commission: Ben Franklin Transit (BFT) commends City of Pasco's efforts to improve access through its complete streets initiatives, as well as efforts to promote infill development. As you know, Pasco residents are already more likely to use transit than other Tri-Cities residents, and, according to the Benton Franklin Council of Governments (BFCOG) 2018 sidewalk inventory, Pasco already has sidewalks in fair or better condition on 75% of its street frontages (a much higher percentage than neighboring jurisdictions). The proposed measures would help close the sidewalk gap in Pasco . Additional development density and more sidewalks would enable more residents to walk from their homes to a bus stop. With increased ridership, BFT can expand and i mprove service. Trans it riders are disproportionately younger (student age) and older (seniors). In addition, many of our riders have disabilities. We commend your efforts to improve sidewalk access, but we also ask for heightened diligence when approving sidewalk designs. The BFCOG study identified some form of obstacle, such as utility poles, in 28% of sidewalks surveyed in Pasco. The State of Washington endorses "strategies that support increased bicycling and walking, as well as greater use of public transportation, which are all shown to increase physical activity levels, contribute to overall improved personal health, and reduce personal and public spending on health care ." BFT 's fixed route bus service depends on safe sidewalks to connect passengers to their destinations. The City Council's 2018-2019 community safety action goals commit Pasco to a review of sidewalk and streetlight inventories, and to support integration of pedestrian, bicycle and other non-vehicular means of transportation. We endorse the proposed changes to the RS-12 and RS -20 zones as a step toward achieving the City's safety goals while helping BFT enable improved access to public transit. Sincerely, Ben Franklin Transit Cc: Keith Hall, Director of Planning and Service Development