The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019.01.28 Council Workshop PacketWorkshop Meeting AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. January 28, 2019 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 3 - 24 (a) Presentation - Public Market Feasibility Analysis Presented by Michael Morales, Community & Economic Development Deputy Director 25 - 36 (b) Presentation - Colima Sister City Program Work Plan & Cooperation Agreement Presented by Michael Morales, Community & Economic Development Deputy Director 37 - 52 (c) Presentation - Operations Plants Presented by Heath Bateman, Division Manager 53 - 73 (d) Rivershore Reconveyance Update and Discussion 74 - 94 (e) Hearing Examiner System for Land Use Permits (MF# CA2018-007) 95 - 123 (f) Comprehensive Plan Update Process 124 - 130 (g) Bid Award - 14001 Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 7. ADJOURNMENT. Page 1 of 130 Workshop Meeting January 28, 2019 REMINDERS: Monday, January 28, 4:00 p.m., Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Advisory Committee Meeting – Ben Franklin Transit Main Conference Room (COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Rep.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability. (Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad.) Page 2 of 130 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 24, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/28/19 FROM: Michael Morales, Deputy Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Presentation - Public Market Feasibility Analysis I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presented by Michael Morales, Community & Economic Development Deputy Director III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 3 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFWĂƐĐŽWƵďůŝĐDĂƌŬĞƚ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇWŚĂƐĞϭ͗DĂƌŬĞƚZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚΘ^ŝƚĞƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ:ĂŶƵĂƌǇϮϴ͕ϮϬϭϵϭPage 4 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ƵŵŵĂƌǇWŽƌƚĂŶĚŝƚǇŽĨWĂƐĐŽƌĞƚĂŝŶĞĚDĂƌŬĞƚsĞŶƚƵƌĞƐ͕/ŶĐ͘ƚŽĞǆƉůŽƌĞƚŚĞƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĨŽƌĚĞǀĞůŽƉŝŶŐĂƉƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚĂŶĚĞǀĂůƵĂƚĞƚǁŽůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶƐ͗ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶĐŽƌĞŶĞĂƌWĂƐĐŽ&ĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛DĂƌŬĞƚDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂů^ƚƵĚǇƚĂƐŬƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͗ŶĂůǇƐŝƐŽĨƐƵƉƉůǇ͕ĚĞŵĂŶĚĂŶĚĐŽŵƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶDĞƌĐŚĂŶĚŝƐŝŶŐĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ^ŝƚĞĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐDĞƚŚŽĚƐŝŶĐůƵĚĞĚ͗ŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇŝŶƚĞƌŶĞƚƐƵƌǀĞǇ;EсϮ͕ϵϴϮͿ/ŶƚĞƌǀŝĞǁƐΘĨŽĐƵƐŐƌŽƵƉƐdƌĂĚĞĂƌĞĂĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐKďƐĞƌǀĂƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůŵĂƌŬĞƚƐĂŶĚƌĞƚĂŝůĞƌƐ^ƚĞĞƌŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƚƚĞĞϮPage 5 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFDŝƐƐŝŽŶǇĚĞĨŝŶŝƚŝŽŶ͕ƉƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚƐĂƌĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶͲĚƌŝǀĞŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐ͘dŚĞŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐŚŽƵůĚĚƌŝǀĞƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͕ŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚĞǀĂůƵĂƚŝŽŶ͘dŚĞƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĞĚŵŝƐƐŝŽŶŽĨƚŚĞdƌŝŝƚŝĞƐWƵďůŝĐDĂƌŬĞƚŝƐƚŽ͗±ƌĞĂƚĞĂǁĞůĐŽŵŝŶŐdƌŝŝƚŝĞƐͲǁŝĚĞŐĂƚŚĞƌŝŶŐƐƉĂĐĞƚŚĂƚďƌŝŶŐƐƚŽŐĞƚŚĞƌĂŶĚĐĞůĞďƌĂƚĞƐƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇ±^ƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƚĂƌƚͲƵƉĞŶƚƌĞƉƌĞŶĞƵƌƐĂŶĚƐŵĂůůŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ±ŶŚĂŶĐĞƚŚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůĨŽŽĚƐǇƐƚĞŵ±ƚƚƌĂĐƚǀŝƐŝƚŽƌƐǁŝƚŚĂƵŶŝƋƵĞůǇdƌŝŝƚŝĞƐĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶ±ĂƚĂůǇǌĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽŶƚŚĞĞĂƐƚƐŝĚĞŽĨƚŚĞdƌŝŝƚŝĞƐϯPage 6 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QF^ŝƚĞZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶKƉƚŝŵĂůƐŝƚĞǁŽƵůĚďĞĂůŽŶŐƚŚĞǁĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŶƚŝŶĂŶŚŝƐƚŽƌŝĐďƵŝůĚŝŶŐǁŝƚŚĂŶĂĚũĂĐĞŶƚŽƵƚĚŽŽƌĨĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛ŵĂƌŬĞƚʹ ŶŽƚĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂůŽĨĨĞƌƐƚŚĞƐƵƉĞƌŝŽƌůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶďƵƚŵŽƌĞĐŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐƚŽŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶŽǁŶƚŽǁŶWĂƐĐŽŽĨĨĞƌƐƚŚĞŶĞĞĚĞĚƐŝƚĞĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐĨŽƌĂƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨƵůƉƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚĂŶĚŵĂƌŬĞƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͖ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŚĞƌĞĐĂŶŚĂƉƉĞŶŵŽƌĞƋƵŝĐŬůǇͬůŽǁĞƌĐŽƐƚZĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚĂƚŝŽŶ͗ƉƵƌƐƵĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶĨŝƌƐƚƚŚƌŽƵŐŚĂƉƵďůŝĐͬŶŽŶƉƌŽĨŝƚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉ͘/ĨƵŶƐƵĐĐĞƐƐĨƵů͕ƌĞĨŝŶĞƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚĐŽŶĐĞƉƚĂƚƚŚĞDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂůĂŶĚŝƐƐƵĞĂŶZ&WƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐ͘3\EXV 3XEOLF0DUNHW*UDQYLOOH,VODQG3XEOLF0DUNHWϰPage 7 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ&ŝŶĚŝŶŐƐĞŵĂŶĚ±ϯͲϭϬŵŝůĞďĂŶĚůĂƌŐĞƐƚůŝŬĞůǇĐƵƐƚŽŵĞƌƐŽƵƌĐĞ±dŽƚĂůĚĞŵĂŶĚΕΨϭϭ͘ϯŵŝůůŝŽŶ±ƐƐƵŵŝŶŐƐĂůĞƐŽĨΨϴϬϬͬƐĨ͕WĂƐĐŽĐĂŶƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƉƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚƵƉƚŽΕϮϰ͕ϬϬϬƐĨ±^ƵƌǀĞǇƌĞƐƉŽŶĚĞŶƚƐƉƌĞĨĞƌDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂůƐŝƚĞϬ͘Ϭйϱ͘ϬйϭϬ͘Ϭйϭϱ͘ϬйϮϬ͘ϬйϮϱ͘ϬйϯϬ͘Ϭйϯϱ͘ϬйϯŵŝůĞƌŝŶŐ ϯͲϭϬŵďĂŶĚ ϭϬͲϰϬŵŝůĞďĂŶĚh^ĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂůƚƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚWĂƐĐŽdƌĂĚĞƌĞĂƐĂĐŚĞůŽƌΖƐĞŐƌĞĞDĂƐƚĞƌΖƐ͕WƌŽĨĞƐƐŝŽŶĂůŽƌŽĐƚŽƌĂƚĞ^ƵƉƉůǇ±'ƌŽǁŝŶŐƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐĞĐƚŽƌŝŶdƌŝŝƚŝĞƐ±WĂƐĐŽŚĂƐǀĂƌŝĞƚǇŽĨĞƚŚŶŝĐƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐďƵƚĨĞǁĞĂƚĞƌŝĞƐĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ±^ŝŶĐĞƌĞŐŝŽŶŚĂƐĨĞǁĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇĨŽŽĚƌĞƚĂŝůĞƌƐ͕ƉƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚǁŝůůŶĞĞĚƚŽƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐƚĂƌƚͲƵƉƐĂŶĚĂƚƚƌĂĐƚǀĞŶĚŽƌƐĨƌŽŵŽƵƚƐŝĚĞƌĞŐŝŽŶ±ĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞĚŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚĨƌŽŵƉŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůǀĞŶĚŽƌƐϱPage 8 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ&ŝŶĚŝŶŐƐŽŵƉĞƚŝƚŝŽŶ±ZĞŐŝŽŶǁĞůůƐĞƌǀĞĚǁŝƚŚǀĂƌŝĞƚǇŽĨƐƵƉĞƌŵĂƌŬĞƚƐĂƚĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚƉƌŝĐĞƉŽŝŶƚƐ͕ĞƚŚŶŝĐĨŽŽĚƐ±ZĂƉŝĚĐŚĂŶŐĞƐƚŽŐƌŽĐĞƌǇƐĞĐƚŽƌ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐĚĞůŝǀĞƌŝĞƐ±WƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚǁŝůůŶĞĞĚƚŽĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚŝĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶƚŚĞƵŶŝƋƵĞĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞŽĨƐŚŽƉƉŝŶŐĂƚĂŶĂƵƚŚĞŶƚŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚϲPage 9 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂůĞƐĐƌŝƉƚŝŽŶ±ϱϱͲĂĐƌĞƐŝƚĞĂůŽŶŐŽůƵŵďŝĂZŝǀĞƌ͕ǀŝƐŝďůĞĨƌŽŵĂďůĞƌŝĚŐĞ±sĂĐĂŶƚůĂŶĚǁŝƚŚĐŽŵƉůĞƚĞĚƌĞŵĞĚŝĂƚŝŽŶ±ϮϬϭϬŵĂƐƚĞƌƉůĂŶĐĂůůƐĨŽƌŵŝǆĞĚͲƵƐĞĚͲƉƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚĐŽƵůĚďĞĐŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůĂŶĚƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞĂŶĐŚŽƌƚŚĂƚƐƉƵƌƐŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚŝŶĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂůƐƐĞƚƐ±>ĂƌŐĞďůĂŶŬƐůĂƚĞǁŝƚŚϱ͕ϬϬϬƐĨDĂƌŝŶĞďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ±tĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŶƚĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ŝŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐƉŝĞƌĂŶĚƚǁŽĂĐƌĞƐďƵŝůĚĂďůĞƉƌŽƉĞƌƚǇŽŶǁĂƚĞƌƐŝĚĞŽĨůĞǀĞĞ±ZŝǀĞƌĨƌŽŶƚƚƌĂŝůΘǀŝƐŝďŝůŝƚǇϳPage 10 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂůŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐ±WƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚĐĂŶŶŽƚďĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚŚĞƌĞŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚůǇʹ ƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂůĂƌŐĞƐĐĂůĞŵŝǆĞĚͲƵƐĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĐŽŶĐĞƉƚĂŶĚŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƚŝŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞŐǇŝŶǀŽůǀŝŶŐƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌƐ±ŽŵƉůĞǆƌŝǀĞƌͲƐŚŽƌĞƉĞƌŵŝƚƚŝŶŐŝƐƐƵĞƐĂŶĚŶĞǁǌŽŶŝŶŐƌĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ±DĂŶǇŵŽƌĞƵŶŬŶŽǁŶƐƚŚĂŶĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶWĂƐĐŽƐŝƚĞ±^ŝŵŝůĂƌĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ;DĂƌƌŽǁDĂƌŬĞƚ,ĂůůͿƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚďǇƉƌŝǀĂƚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉĞƌĂƚKƐƉƌĞǇWŽŝŶƚĞʹ ŝĨƉƌŽĐĞĞĚƐ͕ƚŚĞŶĨƵůĨŝůůƐŶĞĞĚĨŽƌǁĂƚĞƌĨƌŽŶƚŵĂƌŬĞƚϴPage 11 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFŽǁŶƚŽǁŶWĂƐĐŽǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂƐƐĞƚƐ±WĂƐĐŽ&ĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛DĂƌŬĞƚĂŶĚƉůĂǌĂƵƉŐƌĂĚĞ±WĂƐĐŽ^ƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇ<ŝƚĐŚĞŶ±&ŽŽĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ͗sŝĞƌĂ͛ƐĂŬĞƌǇ͕ůdŽƌŝƚŽ DyDĂƌŬĞƚWŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĂƐƐĞƚƐ±&ŽŽĚĐŽƵƌƚƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚĨŽƌďƵŝůĚŝŶŐŶĞǆƚƚŽ&ĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛DĂƌŬĞƚ±KƚŚĞƌŶĞĂƌďǇďƵŝůĚŝŶŐƐĐŽƵůĚďĞƌĞƚƌŽĨŝƚƚĞĚĨŽƌĨŽŽĚΘďĞǀĞƌĂŐĞ±WŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůƚŽĞƐƚĂďůŝƐŚĂďƌĂŶĚĞĚŵĂƌŬĞƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚůŝŬĞWŝŬĞWůĂĐĞĂŶĚ'ƌĂŶǀŝůůĞ/ƐůĂŶĚϵPage 12 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFŽǁŶƚŽǁŶWĂƐĐŽŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐ±EĞŐĂƚŝǀĞƉĞƌĐĞƉƚŝŽŶƐŽĨƉĂƌŬŝŶŐ±&ĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛ŵĂƌŬĞƚƐĂůĞƐĚƌŽƉŽĨĨĨƌŽŵƉĞĂŬ±ŝƐĐŽŵĨŽƌƚŽƌƉƌĞũƵĚŝĐĞƚŚĂƚĚŝƐĐŽƵƌĂŐĞƐƌĞŐŝŽŶĂůƌĞƐŝĚĞŶƚƐĨƌŽŵǀŝƐŝƚŝŶŐĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶϭϬPage 13 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFDĂƌŬĞƚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͞DĂƌŬĞƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͟ŝƐĂďƌĂŶĚŝŶŐĂŶĚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĐŽŶĐĞƉƚ͕ǁŝƚŚŝŶĚŽŽƌĂŶĚŽƵƚĚŽŽƌ;ƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞͿĐŽŵƉŽŶĞŶƚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶĂĚĞĨŝŶĞĚŐĞŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĂƌĞĂƌĂŶĚƉƌŽŵŝƐĞƐ±͞DĂƌŬĞƚĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞ͟ĞǀĞƌǇĚĂǇ±>ŽĐĂůĨŽŽĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐĂŶĚĞŶƚĞƌƚĂŝŶŵĞŶƚ͕ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĞǆƉĞƌŝĞŶĐĞϭϭPage 14 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFDĂƌŬĞƚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚDĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶĚŽǀĞƌƐŝŐŚƚĂƌĞŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉĂŶĚƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂŵĂƌŬĞƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ±DĂƌŬĞƚŝŶŐͬĞǀĞŶƚƐͬƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞĂĐƚŝǀĂƚŝŽŶ±ŽŽƌĚŝŶĂƚĞǁŝƚŚĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĞǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĂƐƐĞƚƐ±ZĞĐƌƵŝƚĐŽŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƌǇďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐ±^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐƉůĂŶŶŝŶŐϭϮPage 15 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFWĂƐĐŽDĂƌŬĞƚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚůĞŵĞŶƚƐǆŝƐƚŝŶŐĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ±WĂƐĐŽ&ĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛DĂƌŬĞƚƉĂǀŝůŝŽŶΘƉůĂǌĂ±sŝĞƌĂ͛ƐĂŬĞƌǇ±WĂƐĐŽ^ƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇ<ŝƚĐŚĞŶ±ůdŽƌŝƚŽ DyŐƌŽĐĞƌǇWŽƚĞŶƚŝĂůĞůĞŵĞŶƚƐ±/ŶĚŽŽƌƉƵďůŝĐŵĂƌŬĞƚǁŝƚŚĨƌĞƐŚ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨŽŽĚƐ±EĞǁŽƵƚĚŽŽƌŵĂƌŬĞƚƐ͗sŝŶƚĂŐĞDĂƌŬĞƚ͕DĂŬĞƌƐDĂƌŬĞƚ±/ŶĚŽŽƌǁŝŶƚĞƌĨĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛ŵĂƌŬĞƚ±&ŽŽĚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶͬĞǀĞŶƚĨĂĐŝůŝƚŝĞƐĂŶĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵŝŶŐ±ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚͲǁŝĚĞĨŽŽĚĨĞƐƚŝǀĂůƐƚŚĂƚĨĞĂƚƵƌĞůŽĐĂůĨŽŽĚŚŝƐƚŽƌǇĂŶĚĂƌĞĂ͛ƐƵŶŝƋƵĞĂŐƌŝĐƵůƚƵƌĂůĂƐƐĞƚƐ±ĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƌĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚƐĂŶĚƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇĨŽŽĚƌĞƚĂŝůĞƌƐϭϯPage 16 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QF^ŝƚĞ^ĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶƌŝƚĞƌŝĂϭ͘ ^ŝǌĞ͕ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ;ĚĞŵĂŶĚĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĞĚƵƉƚŽϮϰ͕ϬϬϬƐĨŐƌŽƐƐͿϮ͘ ĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ;ƉŚǇƐŝĐĂůĂŶĚƉƐǇĐŚŽůŽŐŝĐĂůͿʹ ĐĂƌ͕ƉĞĚĞƐƚƌŝĂŶ͕ƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚ͕ďŝĐǇĐůĞϯ͘ sŝƐŝďŝůŝƚǇĨƌŽŵŚŝŐŚǁĂǇƐŽƌŵĂũŽƌƚŚŽƌŽƵŐŚĨĂƌĞƐϰ͘ ďŝůŝƚǇƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂǁĞůĐŽŵŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞĨŽƌƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇϱ͘ ŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͗ĂƚƚƌĂĐƚŝǀĞŶĞƐƐŽĨƐƵƌƌŽƵŶĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂ͖ĂďŝůŝƚǇƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞƵŶŝƋƵĞĚĞƐƚŝŶĂƚŝŽŶϲ͘ ŽŶƐƵŵĞƌƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ;ƐƵƌǀĞǇͿϳ͘ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ;ƉĞĂŬĚĞŵĂŶĚΕϮϬϬƐƉĂĐĞƐͿϴ͘ ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚŝǀĞĐŽŶƚĞǆƚ͕ƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇŽƚŚĞƌĨŽŽĚďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐϵ͘ /ŵƉĂĐƚŽŶWĂƐĐŽ&ĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛DĂƌŬĞƚϭϬ͘ ŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚůŽĂĚŝŶŐĚŽĐŬƐϭϭ͘ ĂƐĞĂŶĚĐŽƐƚƚŽƐĞĐƵƌĞ͕ŽǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉŽƌůĞĂƐĞĚƵƌĂƚŝŽŶϭϮ͘ ŽƐƚŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚͬƉƵďůŝĐƐƵďƐŝĚǇϭϯ͘ dŝŵĞůŝŶĞͬĐŽŵƉůĞǆŝƚǇŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚϭϰPage 17 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QF^ŝƚĞ^ĞůĞĐƚŝŽŶDĂƚƌŝǆtĞŝŐŚƚĞĚ^ĐŽƌĞƌŝƚĞƌŝĂDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂůŽǁŶƚŽǁŶWĂƐĐŽWŽŝŶƚĚŝĨĨĞƌĞŶƚŝĂů^ŝƚĞĐŚĂƌĂĐƚĞƌŝƐƚŝĐƐ^ŝǌĞ͕ŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌĞǆƉĂŶƐŝŽŶ ϭϬϬ ϴϬ ϮϬĐĐĞƐƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ ϳϬ ϲϬ ϭϬsŝƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ ϯϱ ϮϬ ϭϱďŝůŝƚǇƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞĂǁĞůĐŽŵŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐƐƉĂĐĞ ϱϬ ϯϱ ϭϱŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚͬĂƚƚƌĂĐƚŝǀĞŶĞƐƐŽĨŶĞĂƌďǇĂƌĞĂ ϰϬ Ϯϱ ϭϱŽŶƐƵŵĞƌƉƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐ ϳϬ ϯϬ ϰϬWĂƌŬŝŶŐ ϰϬ Ϯϰ ϭϲ^ƵƉƉŽƌƚŝǀĞĐŽŶƚĞǆƚ ϮϬ ϯϱ Ͳϭϱ/ŵƉĂĐƚŽŶWĂƐĐŽ&ĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛DĂƌŬĞƚ ϮϬ ϱϬ ͲϯϬŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚůŽĂĚŝŶŐĚŽĐŬƐ Ϯϱ ϯϱ ͲϭϬ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůϰϳϬ ϯϵϰ ϳϲĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂƐĞĂŶĚĐŽƐƚƚŽƐĞĐƵƌĞ ϱϬ ϰϬ ϭϬŽƐƚƚŽĚĞǀĞůŽƉ ϲϬ ϭϬϱ ͲϰϱdŝŵĞůŝŶĞͬĐŽŵƉůĞǆŝƚǇŽĨĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ ϯϲ ϵϲ ͲϲϬ^ƵďƚŽƚĂůϭϰϲ Ϯϰϭ ͲϵϱdŽƚĂů ϲϭϲ ϲϯϱ ͲϭϵϭϱPage 18 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐϭ͘ &ĞĂƚƵƌĞǀĞŶĚŽƌƐǁŚŽŽĨĨĞƌĂǀŝďƌĂŶƚŵŝǆŽĨŚŝŐŚƋƵĂůŝƚǇĨƌĞƐŚĂŶĚƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇĨŽŽĚƐĂŶĚĐƌĂĨƚƐƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚŝŶ^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚtĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ͕ĂĐĐŽŵƉĂŶŝĞĚďǇĞƚŚŶŝĐĂůůǇĚŝǀĞƌƐĞƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨŽŽĚĂŶĚĚƌŝŶŬŽĨĨĞƌŝŶŐƐǁŝƚŚĂƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌĨŽĐƵƐŽŶ,ŝƐƉĂŶŝĐĨŽŽĚƐ͕ ŵĂŬŝŶŐƚŚĞWƵďůŝĐDĂƌŬĞƚĂŐƌĞĂƚƉůĂĐĞƚŽƐŚŽƉĂŶĚĞĂƚϮ͘ DĂŬĞƚŚĞŝŶĚŽŽƌŵĂƌŬĞƚůĂƌŐĞĞŶŽƵŐŚƚŽĂƚƚƌĂĐƚĐƵƐƚŽŵĞƌƐĨƌŽŵĂǁŝĚĞŐĞŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐĂƌĞĂ͕ďƵƚŶŽƚƐŽůĂƌŐĞƚŚĂƚǁĞĂŬǀĞŶĚŽƌƐĂƌĞƐĞůĞĐƚĞĚũƵƐƚƚŽĨŝůůƐƉĂĐĞϯ͘ ^ƚƌĞƐƐŝŶŶŽǀĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŽŶͲƐŝƚĞƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ǁŝƚŚŵĂŶǇƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐĞŝƚŚĞƌŐƌŽǁŶŽƌŵĂĚĞďǇƚŚĞǀĞŶĚŽƌ͕ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĂůůǇĐƌĞĂƚŝŶŐƵŶŝƋƵĞĂŶĚƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐŽŶůǇĂǀĂŝůĂďůĞŝŶƚŚĞDĂƌŬĞƚϭϲPage 19 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐϰ͘ /ĨůŽĐĂƚĞĚĚŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͕ŝŶƚĞŐƌĂƚĞƚŚĞWĂƐĐŽ&ĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛DĂƌŬĞƚĂŶĚ^ƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇ<ŝƚĐŚĞŶŝŶƚŽƚŚĞDĂƌŬĞƚ͛ƐŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚďƌĂŶĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŶĚĞǆƉůŽƌĞĐƌĞĂƚŝŽŶŽĨĂďƌĂŶĚĞĚŵĂƌŬĞƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚ͘KǀĞƌƚŝŵĞ͕ĞǆƉĂŶĚƚŚĞŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŶŐĚĂǇƐĨŽƌƚŚĞŽƵƚĚŽŽƌĨĂƌŵĞƌƐ͛ŵĂƌŬĞƚĂŶĚŝŶƚƌŽĚƵĐĞŽƚŚĞƌŵĂƌŬĞƚĂĐƚŝǀŝƚŝĞƐƐƵĐŚĂƐĂ͞ŵĂŬĞƌƐŵĂƌŬĞƚ͟ĂŶĚĂŶƚŝƋƵĞĨĂŝƌƐϱ͘ /ĨůŽĐĂƚĞĚĂƚDĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂů͕ŝŶĐůƵĚĞŽƵƚĚŽŽƌĞǀĞŶƚĂŶĚƐĂůĞƐƐƉĂĐĞϲ͘ ŶĐŽƵƌĂŐĞǀĞŶĚŽƌƐƚŽŚĂǀĞŵƵůƚŝƉůĞƐĂůĞƐĐŚĂŶŶĞůƐƐŽƚŚĞǇĂƌĞŶŽƚƐŽůĞůǇƌĞůŝĂŶƚŽŶŝŶͲŵĂƌŬĞƚƌĞƚĂŝůƐĂůĞƐϳ͘ KƉĞƌĂƚĞŽŶĂĚĂŝůǇďĂƐŝƐ͕ǁŝƚŚĐŽŶǀĞŶŝĞŶƚŚŽƵƌƐϴ͘ ,ŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚƚŚĞƚŚĞĂƚĞƌŽĨďĞŝŶŐĂƚƚŚĞDĂƌŬĞƚǁŝƚŚĂďƵŶĚĂŶƚĚŝƐƉůĂǇƐĂŶĚŽƉĞŶŬŝƚĐŚĞŶƐϭϳPage 20 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ^ƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĞƐϵ͘ ƌĞĂƚĞƐƚƌŽŶŐĐƵƐƚŽŵĞƌͲǀĞŶĚŽƌƌĞůĂƚŝŽŶƐŚŝƉƐďǇƉƌŽǀŝĚŝŶŐŽůĚͲǁŽƌůĚƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůƐĞƌǀŝĐĞďǇƉĂƐƐŝŽŶĂƚĞŽǁŶĞƌͲŽƉĞƌĂƚŽƌƐĂŶĚŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞĂďůĞĞŵƉůŽǇĞĞƐ͕ǁŝƚŚŶŽŶĂƚŝŽŶĂůĐŚĂŝŶƐϭϬ͘tĞůĐŽŵĞ ƚŚĞĞŶƚŝƌĞĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚǇĂŶĚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐĐĞƐƐƚŽĂĨĨŽƌĚĂďůĞ͕ĐƵůƚƵƌĂůůǇĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞĨŽŽĚƐϭϭ͘^ƵƉƉŽƌƚ ƐŵĂůůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞƐǁŝƚŚƐĐĂůĂďůĞƌĞŶƚƐ͕ůŽǁĐŽƐƚĞŶƚƌǇ͕ĂŶĚĂƌĂŶŐĞŽĨŵĂƌŬĞƚŝŶŐƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͕ƚƌĂŝŶŝŶŐƐ͕ŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͕ŵĞŶƚŽƌƐŚŝƉƐ͕ĂŶĚƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉƐϭϮ͘^ƚĂŐĞĨŽŽĚͲĨŽĐƵƐĞĚĞǀĞŶƚƐƚŚĂƚŚŝŐŚůŝŐŚƚDĂƌŬĞƚǀĞŶĚŽƌƐĂŶĚƚŚĞŝƌƵŶŝƋƵĞƉƌŽĚƵĐƚƐϭϯ͘KĨĨĞƌĂďƵŶĚĂŶƚĨƌĞĞƉĂƌŬŝŶŐĂŶĚĞĂƐǇĂĐĐĞƐƐǀŝĂƉƵďůŝĐƚƌĂŶƐŝƚĂŶĚĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚŝǀĞƚƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚĂƚŝŽŶϭϰ͘WƵƌƐƵĞƉĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐƚŚĂƚůŝŶŬƚŚĞWƵďůŝĐDĂƌŬĞƚǁŝƚŚĂƌĞĂŝŶƐƚŝƚƵƚŝŽŶƐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚŝŶŐĨŽŽĚĂĐĐĞƐƐ͕ŚĞĂůƚŚ͕ĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶ͕ĂŶĚƐŵĂůůďƵƐŝŶĞƐƐĞŶƚƌĞƉƌĞŶĞƵƌƐŚŝƉϭϴPage 21 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFWƵďůŝĐDĂƌŬĞƚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚWƌŽŐƌĂŵ>ĞĂƐĞŚŽůĚǀĞŶĚŽƌƐ±DŝǆŽĨĨƌĞƐŚ͕ƐƉĞĐŝĂůƚǇĂŶĚƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚĨŽŽĚƐ͕ǁŝƚŚĨŽŽĚƉƌŽĚƵĐƚŝŽŶŽŶͲƐŝƚĞ±ŽǁŶƚŽǁŶ͗ĚĞƉĞŶĚƐŽŶƐŝƚĞʹŵŝŶŝŵƵŵϭϰǀĞŶĚŽƌƐ±DĂƌŝŶĞdĞƌŵŝŶĂů͗ϭϴͲϮϰǀĞŶĚŽƌƐǀĞŶƚĂŶĚĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƉĂĐĞ^ƚŽƌĂŐĞ^ĞĂƚŝŶŐZĞƐƚƌŽŽŵƐDĂƌŬĞƚŽĨĨŝĐĞ>ŽĂĚŝŶŐĂƌĞĂtĂƐƚĞŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚʹĐŽŵƉĂĐƚŽƌĂŶĚƌĞĐǇĐůŝŶŐWĂƌŬŝŶŐ;ΕϮϬϬƐƉĂĐĞƐƉĞĂŬĚĞŵĂŶĚͿϭϵPage 22 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFEĞǆƚ^ƚĞƉƐ^ĞůĞĐƚƉƌĞĨĞƌƌĞĚĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƐŝƚĞWŚĂƐĞϮĨĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇƐƚƵĚǇͬĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƉůĂŶ±dĞŶĂŶƚŵŝǆƉůĂŶ±ŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůĚĞƐŝŐŶ±DĂƌŬĞƚĚŝƐƚƌŝĐƚďƌĂŶĚŝŶŐΘƉƌŽŐƌĂŵŵŝŶŐ±WĂƌƚŶĞƌƐŚŝƉĞǆƉůŽƌĂƚŝŽŶ͕ƉĂƌƚŝĐƵůĂƌůǇǁŝƚŚƚŚĞĨŽŽĚͬĂŐ͕ĞĚƵĐĂƚŝŽŶĂŶĚŵĞĚŝĐĂůƐĞĐƚŽƌƐ±KǁŶĞƌƐŚŝƉĂŶĚŵĂŶĂŐĞŵĞŶƚƉůĂŶ±DĂƌŬĞƚŝŶŐƐƚƌĂƚĞŐǇ±&ŝŶĂŶĐŝĂůŵŽĚĞůŝŶŐ;ǀĞŶĚŽƌĂŶĚŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶƐƉƌŽĨŽƌŵĂ͕ĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĐŽƐƚĞƐƚŝŵĂƚĞ͕ĨŝŶĂŶĐŝŶŐͿ±ĐŽŶŽŵŝĐŝŵƉĂĐƚĂŶĂůǇƐŝƐKŶŐŽŝŶŐƉƵďůŝĐŝŶƉƵƚĂŶĚĞŶŐĂŐĞŵĞŶƚϮϬPage 23 of 130 3DVFR3XEOLF0DUNHW)HDVLELOLW\6WXG\0DUNHW9HQWXUHV,QFWĂƐĐŽWƵďůŝĐDĂƌŬĞƚ&ĞĂƐŝďŝůŝƚǇ^ƚƵĚǇWŚĂƐĞϭ͗DĂƌŬĞƚZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚΘ^ŝƚĞƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ;ϮϬϳͿϯϮϭͲϮϬϭϲͬǁǁǁ͘ŵĂƌŬĞƚǀĞŶƚƵƌĞƐŝŶĐ͘ĐŽŵϮϭPage 24 of 130 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 24, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/28/19 FROM: Michael Morales, Deputy Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Presentation - Colima Sister City Program Work Plan & Cooperation Agreement I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presented by Michael Morales, Community & Economic Development Deputy Director III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 25 of 130 Page 26 of 130 Page 27 of 130 Page 28 of 130 Pasco-Colima Cooperation Agreement Education & Training Public Health Public Safety Social Services Arts & Culture Tourism Port to Port Trade Opportunities Page 29 of 130 Pasco-Colima Sister City Steering Committee Education PSD, CBCC, WSU-TC Public Health TCCH, Lourdes & Kadlec Foundations Public Safety Pasco Fire & Police Departments Social Services Various Agencies Arts & Culture Patron & Benefactor Groups Tourism Visit Tri-Cities Wine Associations Port to Port Trade Port of Pasco Page 30 of 130 Page 31 of 130 Page 32 of 130 Page 33 of 130 Page 34 of 130 Page 35 of 130 Page 36 of 130 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 23, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/28/19 FROM: Steve Worley, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Presentation - Operations Plants I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presented by Heath Bateman, Division Manager III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 37 of 130 Page 38 of 130 Page 39 of 130 Superintendent of Public Works Division Manager Water Treatment Plants x2 Chief WTP Operator x1 Water Plant Operator x3 Utility Maintenance Worker x1 Waste Water Treatment Plant x1 Lab Tech x1 Chief WWTP Plant Operator x1 Waste Water Plant Operator x6 Utility Maintenance Worker x2Page 40 of 130 Page 41 of 130 Page 42 of 130 Page 43 of 130 Page 44 of 130 Page 45 of 130 Page 46 of 130 Page 47 of 130 Page 48 of 130 Page 49 of 130 Page 50 of 130 Page 51 of 130 Page 52 of 130 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 23, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/28/19 FROM: Zach Ratkai, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Rivershore Reconveyance Update and Discussion I. REFERENCE(S): Powerpoint Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Unknown at this time. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: For the past couple years, the Tri-Cities region, catalyzed by the City of Kennewick and facilitated through TRIDEC, has been discussing the re-conveyance of the Columbia River shoreline from Federal control to local agencies. During the latter part of 2018, Kennewick, Pasco and Richland, in partnership with TRIDEC each conducted public meetings to present information, gather input, and gauge overall support for the project on the part of the public. The Council was updated on the re-conveyance evaluation effort on September 24, 2018 and most recently updated on November 13, 2018 by staff. Since the last update, TRIDEC initiated a study on a number of underlying concerns expressed by the cities and counties in the region, based in part on public inpu t from the three public meetings. This study addresses the following areas of concern: - Deed Restrictions: What existing deed restrictions exist on current USACE -owned property? Page 53 of 130 - Environmental Review: What Federal environmental regulations would be exempt during and after the transfer, as well, which applicable state environmental regulations would remain? - Tribal Treaties and Rights: How would a potential land transfer impact historical tribal treaties and rights to the land and river access? - Federal Flowage Easement Status: Some jurisdictions, including Pasco, have USACE-controlled flowage easements on parcels away from the rivershore. How would a potential land transfer impact these easements? An analysis on these issues was released for review by TRIDEC on January 11th. The presentation this evening will go through the results of the research in order to provide the Pasco City Council with a number of options regarding a decision on involvement in land transfer legislation. TRIDEC has requested that all jurisdictions potentially interested in pursuing re- conveyance provide details regarding their support/non-support and the extent of lands each jurisdiction wishes to have conveyed to TRIDEC by February 8, 2019 in order to begin drafting legislation in the United State Congress. Should Council direct, staff can formulate a formal response to TRIDEC to have ready for signature at the February 4, 2019 City Council regular meeting. V. DISCUSSION: City staff will present the findings and analysis in order to begin discussion on Pasco's desired course of action. Page 54 of 130 Page 55 of 130 Page 56 of 130 Page 57 of 130 Page 58 of 130 Page 59 of 130 Page 60 of 130 Page 61 of 130 Page 62 of 130 Page 63 of 130 Page 64 of 130 Page 65 of 130 Page 66 of 130 Insert photos from GIS team Page 67 of 130 Current Shoreline Page 68 of 130 Page 69 of 130 Page 70 of 130 Page 71 of 130 Type Cost Pro/Con Full $$$$PRO: Local control,fewer agencies CON:All costs ours, WA regs apply, responsible for private owners Partial $$PRO: Control of parks/public,familiar w/ lands CON: None $PRO: Little budget impact, no new regulations, processes for maintenance in place CON: Bureaucratic layers for simple maintenance, limited improvement capability Page 72 of 130 Page 73 of 130 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 21, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/28/19 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Hearing Examiner System for Land Use Permits (MF# CA2018-007) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance Amending Title 2 of the PMC Proposed Ordinance Amending Title 25 of the PMC Proposed Ordinance Amending Title 26 of the PMC II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion - no action is requested of City Council at this time. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: At the Council Workshop in October 2018, City Council concurred that incorporating the use of a hearing examiner system for additional responsibilities in land use and project permitting was a preferred course for the City. City Council also concurred that the hearing examiner system (including the rendering of final decisions on applicable land use actions) would increase expediency and decrease liability in land use and project permitting. Toward that end, staff has prepared revisions to Pasco Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel); Title 25 (Zoning); Title 26 (Pasco Urban Area Subdivision regulations) and prepared and distributed a Request for Proposals (to the Washington State Hearing Examiner Association) for additional hearing examiner duties. At present, the hearing examiner duties include: • Variances, review of administrative actions, waiver of violations, extension on use of borders of zoning districts and administrative exceptions; • Appeals of administrative decisions; • SEPA appeals; • Vehicle impounds; and, Page 74 of 130 • Appeals of decisions of the Poundmaster and Business license revocations, appeals and reinstatement. This past October Council also noted that our neighboring cities (Kennewick, Richland, Walla Walla and Yakima) use the hearing examiner system in one form or another. In November and December of 2018 the Planning Commission conducted a workshop on expansion of the hearing examiner duties and held a public hearing on the proposed code revisions necessary to accommodate that process. The Planning Commission recognized that use of a hearing examiner for additional land use and project permitting would reserve for the Commission: • Comprehensive Plan development and review; • Master Plans/special planning projects or design standard developments; • Shoreline Management Plan development and review; • Rezone requests; • Annexation Zoning; • Development Agreements; • Code Amendments; and • Block Grant and HOME Advisory Committee recommendations The Commission has forwarded a recommendation to Council for approval of the attached code amendments. V. DISCUSSION: The process associated with the Request for Proposals and choice of a hearing examiner is not yet complete. The attached PMC revisions will be timed and brought back to Council so that the legislative process of formalizing additional hearing examiner duties is concurrent with the starting date of the examiner. Staff is providing Council this update and expects to bring the proposed ordinances back to City Council for action so the additional duties for the hearing examiner may begin on April 1st this year. Page 75 of 130 Page 1 of 6 ORDINANCE NO. ______ AN ORDINANCE relating to the hearing examiner and amending PMC Title 2 “Administration and Personnel”. WHEREAS, cities have the responsibility to regulate and control the physical development within their borders and to ensure public health, safety and welfare are maintained; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has zoning regulations that encourage orderly growth and development; and WHEREAS, over time, regulations and case law have evolved to produce a complicated administration process related to this Title; and WHEREAS, use of politically appointed or elected officials administering land use law has become prone to liability and complicated land use and project approval decisions; and WHEREAS, use of a hearing examiner system has proven to be an advantageous revision to municipalities in the area of land use regulations; and WHEREAS, a hearing examiner is a specifically trained individual that is experienced in the knowledge and application of land use law and project permitting; and WHEREAS, use of a hearing examiner system can reduce the liability exposure of the City and increase the resources that the City Council and Planning Commission can concentrate on policy decisions; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that to further the purposes of comprehensive planning and to maintain and protect the welfare of the community, it is necessary to amend PMC Title 2 to establish increase decision authority for the hearing examiner, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following section of Chapter 2.19 entitled “Hearing Examiner” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 2.19.010 PURPOSE. The purpose of this Chapter is to establish a hearing examiner system for the application of land use regulatory controls, appeal of administrative determinations and decisions and including those administrative decisions and determinations made pursuant to Chapter 43.21C RCW (SEPA), animal code appeals, vehicle and personal property forfeiture hearings, vehicle impoundment hearings, and such other determinations and appeals as be required by the City and permitted by law. This system is adopted to: A) Insure procedural due process and appearance of fairness in administrative and regulatory hearings. Page 76 of 130 Page 2 of 6 B) Provide an efficient and effective decision making and appellate system which integrates the public hearing and decision-making process. 2.19.020 CREATION OF HEARING EXAMINER. The office of Pasco Hearing Examiner, hereinafter referred to as "examiner" is hereby created. The examiner or examiners shall interpret, review, and render decisions on land use regulations, conduct hearings thereon; hear and determine appeals of administrative decisions and determinations, including appeals of administrative decisions or determinations pursuant to 43.21C RCW (SEPA); animal code appeals, vehicle and personal property forfeiture hearings, vehicle impoundment hearings, and such other determinations and appeals as be required by the City and permitted by law, or imposed by other ordinances of the City of Pasco. 2.19.030 APPOINTMENT AND TERMS. The City Manager may appoint one or more examiners for renewable terms of one (1) year; however, said appointment may be terminated by either party upon sixty (60) days advanced notice. Such appointments may be made by professional service contract. Examiners may also be contracted to serve on an as-needed basis. 2.19.040 QUALIFICATIONS. Examiners shall be appointed solely with regard to their qualifications for the duties of their office and will have such training and experience as will qualify them to conduct administrative or quasi-judicial hearings on regulatory enactments and to discharge the other functions conferred upon them. Examiners shall hold no other elective or appointed office or position in the City of Pasco. 2.19.050 FREEDOM FROM IMPROPER INFLUENCE. No person shall attempt to influence an examiner in any manner pending before him/her except publicly at a public hearing duly called for such purpose, or to interfere with an examiner in the performance of his/her duties in any other way; PROVIDED, that this Section shall not prohibit the City Attorney from rendering legal services to the examiner. 2.19.060 CONFLICT OF INTEREST. No examiner shall conduct or participate in any open record hearing, decision or recommendation in which the examiner has a direct or indirect substantial financial or family interest, or concern in which the examiner has had substantial prehearing contacts with proponents or opponents wherein the issues were discussed. This is not intended to prohibit necessary or proper inquiries on matters such as scheduling, but any such contacts are to be entered into the official record of the hearing. Whenever possible, such inquiries and the responses to such inquiries shall be in writing. 2.19.070 RULES. The examiner shall have the power to prescribe rules for the scheduling and conduct of hearings and other procedural matters related to the duties of his office. Such rules shall provide for rebuttal, and may authorize the examiner to limit the time allowed to parties testifying on an equal basis, and time limits on rebutting. Any person desiring to question other parties testifying at the hearing shall direct such questions to the examiner, who shall rule on whether or not such questions are to be answered and who shall answer them. 2.19.080 POWERS. The examiner shall receive and examine available information, conduct public hearings and prepare a record thereof, and enter decisions as provided for herein. The examiner, subject to the appropriate conditions and safeguards as provided by the Pasco Municipal Code, shall hear and decide: Page 77 of 130 Page 3 of 6 A) Land use decisions including preliminary plats, special and conditional use permits, planned density developments, recreational vehicle parks, wineries, variances, review of administrative actions, waiver of violations, extension of use on border of district, and administrative exceptions as provided in PMC 25.84.020. The examiner may also conduct hearings and prepare recommendations for City Council consideration of rezone applications. B) Administrative Decisions. Appeals of administrative decisions or determinations may be heard by the examiner as directed by the City Manager, City Council or by Ordinance. C) SEPA Appeals. Appeals of administrative decisions and determinations made pursuant to Chapter 43.21C RCW may be heard by the examiner. D) Vehicle Impounds. The examiner shall conduct vehicle impound hearings as provided in PMC Chapter 10.18. E) Criminal Seizure and Forfeiture Hearings. The examiner may, as designee of the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the City of Pasco, conduct seizure and forfeiture hearings as provided in RCW 10.105.010. F) Animal Code - - Wild, Potentially Dangerous or Dangerous Animals. The examiner shall hear the appeal of any owner of an animal determined by the Poundmaster to be a dangerous or potentially dangerous animal as provided in Chapter 8.02 of the Pasco Municipal Code. G) Hear revocations, appeals, and requests for reinstatement of business license under Title 5 PMC. H) Hear appeals of a Right-of-Way Use Permit, Construction Permit, or the renewal or conditioning thereof. G) Other Powers. In the performance of duties prescribed by this Chapter or other ordinances, examiners may: 1) Administer oaths and affirmations, examine witnesses, rule upon offers of proof, receive relevant evidence, and conduct discovery procedures which may include propounding interrogatories and taking oral depositions pursuant to Washington State Court Rules; PROVIDED, that no person shall be compelled to divulge information which he could not be compelled to divulge in a court of law. 2) Upon the request of any other party, or upon his own volition, issue, and cause to be served subpoenas to the attendance of witnesses and for production of examination of any books, records, or other information in the possession or under the control of any witness; PROVIDED, that such subpoenas shall state the name and address of the witness sought, and if for production of books, documents or things, shall specifically identify the same and the relevance thereof to the issues involved. 3) Regulate the course of the hearing in accordance with this and other applicable ordinances. 4) Hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties. 5) Dispose of procedural requests or similar matters. 6) Take any other action authorized by ordinance. In case of failure or refusal without lawful excuse of any person duly subpoenaed to attend pursuant to said subpoena, or to be sworn, or to answer any material and proper question, or to produce upon reasonable notice any material of proper books or records or other information in his possession and under his control, the examiner may invoke the aid of the City Attorney who shall apply to the appropriate court for an order or other court action necessary to secure enforcement of the subpoena. 7) The examiner is hereby empowered to act in lieu of the Board of Adjustment, and such officials, boards or commissions as may be assigned. Wherever existing Page 78 of 130 Page 4 of 6 ordinances, codes or policies authorize or direct the Board of Adjustment, or other officials, boards or commissions to undertake certain activities which the examiner has been assigned, such ordinances, codes or policies shall be construed to refer to the examiner. (Ord. 4347, 2017.) 8) The examiner may, as a part of any land use hearing, conduct an unescorted view of the subject property and shall report on the record the date, time and general location of the view. 2.19.090 PUBLIC HEARING. Prior to rendering a decision, the examiner shall hold an open record public hearing thereon with proper notice according to the procedures for hearing notification as prescribed. Such notice shall include an invitation to any interested parties to submit information in writing in advance of the hearing if unable to be present at the hearing, and an invitation to review any information submitted during the seven (7) days preceding the hearing. The examiner presiding at the hearing shall admit and give probative affect to evidence which possesses probative value commonly accepted by reasonably prudent men in the conduct of their affairs and shall give affect to the rules of privilege recognized by law. All evidence including records and documents in the possession of the City which the examiner desires to consider shall be offered and made a part of the record. After all interested parties have had an opportunity to speak, in accordance with the examiner's rules for conducting a hearing, the examiner shall either close the hearing, continue the hearing to a specified date, or invite additional testimony restricted only to issues which, in the opinion of the examiner, there is need for additional testimony, and thereafter the hearing shall be closed or continued to a specified date. A continuing hearing to a specified date may be restricted to testimony or evidence on specific aspects of the case. No additional information may be submitted after the close of the hearing, unless, in the opinion of the examiner, additional opportunity for testimony is warranted. In such case, the hearing may be re-opened upon seven (7) days written notice to all parties who participated at the first hearing. Once legal notice has been given, no matter shall be postponed over the objection of any interested party, except for good cause shown. Continuances may be granted at the discretion of the examiner: PROVIDED, interested parties in attendance shall be given an opportunity to testify prior to the continuance. The applicant shall be given opportunity to testify prior to the continuance. The applicant shall pay an amount equal to one-half (1/2) the original application fee for any hearing postponed or continued by request of the applicants after legal notice has been given: PROVIDED, that this requirement shall not apply where the request is based upon new information presented at the hearing. 2.19.100 EXAMINER'S DECISION. The examiner shall render a written decision within ten (10) working days of the conclusion of a hearing, unless a longer period is agreed to in writing by the applicant. The decision shall include at least the following: A) Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law based upon and supported by the record. B) A decision and/or order based upon the findings granting, conditionally granting, or denying the relief requested. C) A statement that the decision will become final in twenty-one (21) calendar days unless appealed to the Franklin County Superior Court, together with a description of the appeal procedure. Page 79 of 130 Page 5 of 6 2.19.110 NOTICE OF EXAMINER'S DECISION. Not later than three (3) working days following the rendering of a written decision, copies thereof shall be mailed to the applicant and to the other parties of record in the case. "Parties of record" shall include the applicant and all other persons who specifically request notice of decision by signing a register provided for such purpose at the public hearing, or otherwise provide written request for such notice. 2.19.120 APPEAL FROM EXAMINER'S DECISION. Except for impound hearing decisions provided in PMC 10.18.045, where appeals shall be to the Pasco Municipal Court, all other decisions of the hearing examiner shall be final and conclusive unless a timely appeal thereof is filed with the Superior Court of Franklin County by an aggrieved party within twenty-one (21) calendar days from the date of issuance of the decision in the manner required by law. Section 2. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this ____ day of _________________, 2019. __________________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ __________________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 80 of 130 Page 6 of 6 Page 81 of 130 Page 1 of 8 ORDINANCE NO. ______ AN ORDINANCE relating to use of a hearing examiner and zoning amending PMC Title 25 “Zoning”. WHEREAS, cities have the responsibility to regulate and control the physical development within their borders and to ensure public health, safety and welfare are maintained; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has zoning regulations that encourage orderly growth and development; and WHEREAS, over time, regulations and case law have evolved to produce a complicated administration process related to Title; and WHEREAS, use of politically appointed or elected officials administering land use law has become prone to liability and complicated land use and project approval decisions; and WHEREAS, use of a hearing examiner system has proven to be an advantageous revision to municipalities in the area of land use regulations; and WHEREAS, a hearing examiner is a specifically trained individual that is experienced in the knowledge and application of land use law and project permitting; and WHEREAS, use of a hearing examiner system can reduce the liability exposure of the City and increase the resources that the City Council and Planning Commission can concentrate on policy decisions; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that to further the purposes of comprehensive planning and to maintain and protect the welfare of the community, it is necessary to amend PMC Title 25 to establish increase decision authority for the hearing examiner, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following section of Chapter 25.64 entitled “Planned Density Development” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 25.64.080 PROCEDURE. (1) Any property owner or property owners may petition by application for a planned density development designation. There shall be filed with the application a Title report showing an existing interest in the property by the applicant. Said Title report shall also include the names and addresses of all property owners within three hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the subject property; (2) The petition shall be presented to the City Planning Commission Hearing Examiner who shall after public hearing make his/her recommendation to the City Council decision in writing as to whether the planned density development shall be approved, modified or denied. All planned density developments shall be platted in accordance with Chapter 21, Plats and Subdivisions, of the Pasco Municipal Code; Page 82 of 130 Page 2 of 8 (3) The City Council may, after receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission, designate by ordinance the planned density development and shall require said designation to be entered on the preliminary plat; and (3) If the preliminary plat is not given final approval within five years from the date of the public hearing at which approval was granted, the plat shall become invalid and approval for the planned density development shall expired. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) Section 2. The following section of Chapter 25.69 entitled “Recreational Vehicle Parks” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 25.69.100 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK APPLICATION PROCEDURE. (1) The applicant shall make application at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the Planning Commission meeting open record hearing at which action is desired; on forms provided by the Planning Officer; (2) The application shall include a $300 fee as established in Title 3, be accompanied by an Environmental Checklist with associated fee, and a report from a Title insurance company showing ownership of the property involved and a list of the names and addresses of all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the proposed development; (3) The application shall further be accompanied by twenty (20) copies of a site plan which shall be drawn at a scale of not less than one hundred (100) feet to the inch, and shall be clear and precise. If necessary, the site plan can consist of more than one (1) drawing. The site plan shall contain, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: (a) Name of the owner and operator, with address and phone numbers; and the name of the proposed recreational vehicle park. (b) Legal description of the subject tract of land. (c) Name, address and phone number of the person or firm preparing the site plan. (d) Scale of the drawing and north arrow. (e) The area and dimensions of the tract of land. (f) The number, size and location of all recreational vehicle spaces. (g) The number, location and size of all off-street parking spaces. (h) The location and width of all streets and walkways. (i) The location of service buildings, management offices, sanitary stations, recreation areas, and any other proposed facilities or structures. (j) Location of all utility easements. (k) Specifications of the water supply, sewage disposal, electrical supply, and refuse collection systems. (l) Drainage plan (may be submitted on a separate drawing). (m) Landscaping plan (may be submitted on a separate drawing). (n) Topography at an appropriate contour interval unless specifically waived by the City Engineer. (o) A vicinity map indicating the names and locations of all streets within at least a quarter mile radius of the subject area. (o) Signage. (p) Fencing and screening. (4) Special Permit Review. Once a complete application has been received by the City, the Planning Office will schedule a hearing before the hearing examiner Planning Commission. The application will then continue through the standard special permit process until a special permit is approved or denied. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) Page 83 of 130 Page 3 of 8 Section 3. The following section of Chapter 25.70 entitled “Use Regulations” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 25.70.160 WINERIES. The following standards must be met or exceeded: (1) Outdoor Storage. Outdoor storage of any kind, except wine storage, is prohibited unless such storage is completely screened from public view by an opaque screening device. Screening visible from public rights-of-way and less intense zoning districts shall be constructed of brick, decorative concrete, natural stone, decorative masonry or cedar fencing material. Screening shall be constructed and maintained at a sufficient height to visually screen all stored materials; (2) Utilitarian Areas. All areas of the property used for loading and unloading purposes, trash receptacles, transformers and utility purposes shall be visually screened as provided in Section (1) above; (3) Landscape and Buffering. In addition to the landscape provisions of Chapter 25.75, the Planning Commission hearing examiner may require additional landscape features to ensure the proposed winery will be in harmony with and not impair the value of present and future development of adjacent lands. The spacing of shade trees in all buffer areas shall not be greater than thirty linear feet. Buffer area trees shall be a caliper size of one and one-half inch at the planting; (4) Exterior Lighting. Exterior lighting shall be directed on site so as not to interfere with the comfort and repose of adjoining property owners; and (5) Building Design. The exterior of all structures shall be constructed of brick, natural stone, exposed aggregate, decorative concrete, stucco, cedar siding or lap siding as approved by the Planning Commission hearing examiner. Roofing materials may consist of composition shingles, standing rib or delta rib, baked enamel metal roofs, or alternate as approved by the Planning Commission. hearing examiner (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) Section 4. The following section of Chapter 25.84 entitled “Land Use Hearings by Examiner” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 25.84.020 LAND USE DECISION AUTHORITY. The hearing examiner shall receive and examine available information, conduct public hearings, and prepare a record thereof, and enter findings of fact, conclusions and a decision as provided for herein. The hearing examiner shall hear and decide the following land use decisions: A) Land use decisions described in Section 2.19.080 Special and Conditional Uses; Preliminary Plats; Planned Unit Developments; B) Variances. Applications for variances from the terms of this Title; PROVIDED, that any variance granted shall be subject to such conditions as will assure that the adjustment thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zoning which the subject property is situated, and that the following circumstances are found to apply: 1) Because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property, including size, shape, topography, location of surroundings, the strict application of the zoning ordinance is found to deprive subject property of rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and under identical zone classification. 2) That the granting of the variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the subject property is situated. Page 84 of 130 Page 4 of 8 3) The special circumstances applicable to the subject property were not created through the action(s) of the applicant or any predecessor in interest. C) Review - Administrative Action. Appeals may be heard by the examiner, where it is alleged by the applicant that there is error in any order, requirement, permit, decision or determination made by the City Planner in the administration or enforcement of this Title. Where the street or lot lay out actually on the ground, or as recorded, are different from the street and lot lines as shown on the zoning map, the examiner, after notice to the owners of the property, and after public hearings, shall interpret the map in such a way as to carry out the intent and purposes of this Title. In case of any questions as to the location of any boundary line between zoning districts, a request for interpretation of the zoning map may be made to the examiner, and a determination shall be made by the examiner. D) Waiver of Violations. Recognizing the fact that a building may be erected in good faith with every intent to comply with the provisions of this Title in respect to the location of the building upon the lot and the size and location of required yards, and that it may later be determined that such building does not comply in every detail with such requirements, although not violating the spirit or intent of the zoning ordinance, the examiner may issue a waiver of violation subject to such conditions as will safeguard the public health, safety, convenience and general welfare. E) Extension of Use on Border of District. The examiner may hear and approve the extension of a use or building into a more restricted zone classification immediately adjacent thereto, but not more than thirty (30) feet beyond the dividing line of the two (2) zone classifications, and under such conditions as will safeguard development in the more restricted district. F) Administrative Exceptions. An administrative exception not to exceed one (1) foot of any dimensional standard pertinent to front yard, side yard, rear yard, flanking street, and building line may be granted by administrative action of the examiner without public hearing and without posting or public notices. 25.84.030 LAND USE APPLICATION. Applications for permits or approvals within the jurisdiction of the hearing examiner shall be presented to the office of the Planning Division. The City Planner shall accept such applications only if application shall be accepted only if applicable filing requirements are met. The City Planner Planning Division shall be responsible for assigning a date for and assuring due notice of public hearing for each application, which date and notice shall be in accordance with the statute or ordinance governing the application. 25.84.040 REPORT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR LAND USE APPLICATION. For any land use issue coming before the examiner, the Department of Community Development shall coordinate and assemble the reviews of other City Departments, governmental agencies, and other interested parties and shall prepare a report summarizing the factors involved and the department's finding and recommendations. At least seven (7) calendar days prior to the scheduled hearing, the report shall be filed with the examiner and copies thereof shall be mailed to the applicant and made available for public inspection. Copies thereof shall be provided to interested parties upon payment of reproduction costs. In the event that information to be provided by the applicant or other parties outside of City control has not been provided in sufficient time for filing seven (7) days in advance of the hearing, the Community Development Department may reschedule the hearing and notify interested parties. (Ord 3765 Sec. 4, 2006) Section 5. The following section of Chapter 25.86 entitled “Special Permits” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: Page 85 of 130 Page 5 of 8 25.86.050 PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED. Upon the filing of a complete application for a special permit, the application shall be scheduled for an open record pre-decision hearing before the Planning Commission hearing examiner. Notice of such open record hearing shall be given as provided for in Section 25.88.040. Except that in the case of commercial agricultural uses, the notification distance shall be increased to 1,000 feet. The open record hearing may be continued as deemed necessary by the Planning Commission hearing examiner, provided the applicant consents to any such continuance. In the event the applicant does not consent to a continuance, the Planning Commission hearing examiner shall close the public hearing and render a decision recommendation to the City Council in accordance with the provisions of Sections 25.86.060 and 2.19.100 25.86.070. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) 25.86.060 FINDINGS OF FACT BY PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING EXAMINER. Upon conclusion of the open record pre-decision hearing, the hearing examiner Planning Commission shall make and enter findings from the record and conclusions thereof as to whether or not: (1) The proposal is in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives, maps and/or narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; (2) The proposal will adversely affect public infrastructure; (3) The proposal will be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity; (4) The location and height of proposed structures and the site design will discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof; (5) The operations in connection with the proposal will be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district; and (6) The proposal will endanger the public health, or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) 25.86.065 SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS BY HEARING EXAMINER PLANNING COMMISSION FOR SHOPS/GARAGES. In addition to making and entering conclusions from the record for special permits based on the criteria in 25.86.060 the Planning Commission hearing examiner shall consider the following for special permits dealing with increased heights and/or floor area for detached shops and garages: (1) Will the shop/garage match the principle structure in design and exterior treatments such as roofing materials, siding, color, window and door openings, eave overhangs, fenestrations and other architectural features; (2) Will the existing topography and elevation of the site and surrounding property exacerbate or attenuate the height of the proposed shop/garage; (3) Will the proposal include landscaping features or berms to ameliorate the height and/or floor area of the shop/garage; (4) Will the shop/garage be erected on the property utilizing minimum setbacks; (5) Is the site larger than the minimum lot size requirement for the zoning district. (Ord. 4144, 2014; Ord. 4110, 2013.) 25.86.070 RECOMMENDATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION. After a open record pre-decision hearing on a proposed temporary, conditional or unclassified use, the Planning Page 86 of 130 Page 6 of 8 Commission shall render a recommendation to the City Council as to whether the proposal be denied, approved, or approved with modifications and/or conditions. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) 25.86.080 APPEAL - FILING REQUIREMENTS. (1) Any recommendation of the Planning Commission regarding a special permit application may be appealed in accordance with one of the following methods: (a) Applicant. Within ten calendar days from the date of the Planning Commission recommendation, the applicant files written appeal with the City Planner stating the basis of appeal from said recommendation. (b) Other Person. Within ten calendar days from the date of the Planning Commission recommendation, any person aggrieved by said decision files written appeal with the City Planner stating the harm to be experienced by such person as a result of the Planning Commission's recommendation. (c) A proper and timely filed appeal shall cause the City Council to schedule a closed record hearing, notice of which shall be given in accordance with Section 25.88.040 to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation. (2) Either method of appeal shall include payment of an appeal fee in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100) at the time of filing said appeal. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) 25.86.090 CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. (1) Unless a proper and timely appeal is filed or the City Council by majority vote deems further review is necessary, the recommendation of the Planning Commission shall be effected by proper action of the City Council without further review. In the event the City Council deems further review is necessary, it shall conduct a closed record hearing, notice of which shall be given in accordance with Section 25.88.040; (2) In those cases, which require further review, the City Council shall at the conclusion of a closed record hearing make and enter findings of fact and take one of the following actions: (a) Approve the special permit with or without conditions. (b) Deny the special permit. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) 25.86.100 EFFECTIVE DATE. Special permits shall become effective on the day after the date of the decision of the City Council. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) 25.86.120 EXTENSIONS. The City Council hearing examiner may grant a one-time extension without a public hearing provided the extension does not exceed six months and an application for extension is submitted to the City Planner hearing examiner no later than thirty days prior to the expiration date of the special permit. This provision does not apply to temporary special permits. (Ord. 4110, 2013; Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) 25.86.130 REVOCATION OF PERMIT. Any special permit may be revoked by the City Council hearing examiner if, after a public hearing, notice of which shall be given in accordance with Section 25.88.040, it is found that the conditions upon which the special permit was authorized have not been fulfilled or if the use authorized has changed in size, scope, nature or intensity so as to become a detriment to the surrounding area. The decision of the City Council is final. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999.) Section 6. The following Section of Chapter 25.88 entitled “Notice Requirements” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: Page 87 of 130 Page 7 of 8 25.88.040 NOTICE REQUIREMENTS. At least ten fourteen days notice of time, place and general purpose of any open record hearing required by this chapter shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. In addition thereto, written notice of the hearing shall be mailed to each property owner of record, within three hundred feet of the boundaries of the area proposed to be changed or altered. Owners of record shall be determined by a title company report not more than thirty calendar days preceding the date of publication. Substantial compliance shall be deemed to be full and sufficient compliance. (Ord. 3354 Sec. 2, 1999) Section 7. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this ____ day of _________________, 2019. __________________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________________ __________________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 88 of 130 Page 8 of 8 Page 89 of 130 Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. ______ AN ORDINANCE relating to use of a hearing examiner and amending PMC Title 26 “Pasco Urban Area Subdivision Regulations”. WHEREAS, cities have the responsibility to regulate and control the physical development within their borders and to ensure public health, safety and welfare are maintained; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has zoning regulations that encourage orderly growth and development; and WHEREAS, over time, regulations and case law have evolved to produce a complicated administration process related to Title; and WHEREAS, use of politically appointed or elected officials administering land use law has become prone to liability and complicated land use and project approval decisions; and WHEREAS, use of a hearing examiner system has proven to be an advantageous revision to municipalities in the area of land use regulations; and WHEREAS, a hearing examiner is a specifically trained individual that is experienced in the knowledge and application of land use law and project permitting; and WHEREAS, use of a hearing examiner system can reduce the liability exposure of the City and increase the resources that the City Council and Planning Commission can concentrate on policy decisions; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that to further the purposes of comprehensive planning and to maintain and protect the welfare of the community, it is necessary to amend PMC Title 26 to establish increase decision authority for the hearing examiner, NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The following section of Chapter 26.24 entitled “Preliminary Plat” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 26.24.050 PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED. (1) Upon receipt of a fully completed application for preliminary plat approval, a date shall be set for an open record pre-decision hearing before the hearing examiner Planning Commission at the next regular meeting for which adequate notice can be given. (2) Any notice of public hearing required by this section shall include the hour and location of the hearing and a description of the property to be subdivided. The description may be in the form of either a vicinity location sketch or a written description other than a legal description. (3) At a minimum, a notice of the pre-decision open record hearing is to be given in the following manner: (a) Notice shall be published not less than ten (10) fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation within Franklin County; Page 90 of 130 Page 2 of 5 (b) Notice shall be mailed to the owners of real property, as shown by the records of the County Assessor, located within three hundred (300) feet of any portion of the boundary of the proposed subdivision; (c) Where the proposed subdivision adjoins the municipal boundaries of the City of Pasco notice shall be mailed to the appropriate county officials; (d) Where the proposed subdivision is located adjacent to the right-of-way of a state highway notice shall be mailed to the Washington State Department of Transportation; and (e) Where the proposed subdivision is located within two (2) miles of a publicly owned airport, notice shall be mailed to the Washington State Secretary of Transportation. (Ord. 3398 Sec. 2, 1999.) 26.24.060 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. After a open record pre-decision hearing on a proposed preliminary plat, the Planning Commission shall render a recommendation within fourteen (14) days to the City Council as to whether the proposal based on the findings shall be denied, approved or approved with modifications or conditions. (Ord. 3398 Sec. 2, 1999.) 26.24.060 FINDINGS OF FACT. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, the hearing examiner Planning Commission shall approve the preliminary plat with or without conditions or deny the preliminary plat. The hearing examiner shall make and enter into findings from the record and conclusions thereof as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of this Title; (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. (Ord. 3398 Sec. 2, 1999.) 26.24.080 CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. (1) Unless a proper and timely appeal is filed or the City Council by majority vote deems further review is necessary, the recommendation of the Planning Commission shall be confirmed by a resolution of the City Council without further review. In the event of an appeal or the City Council deems further review is necessary, it shall conduct a closed record hearing, notice of which shall be given in accordance with Section 26.24.050. (2) In those cases that require further review, the City Council shall at the conclusion of such a closed record hearing make and enter findings of fact following the review criteria of 26.24.070 and take one of the following actions: (a) Approve the preliminary plat with or without conditions; (b) Deny the preliminary plat. (Ord. 3398 Sec. 2, 1999.) Page 91 of 130 Page 3 of 5 26.24.090 NOTICE OF DECISION. Following adoption of a resolution approving or denying a preliminary plat, the applicant shall be notified of the City Council’s hearing examiner’s action. The notice shall be accompanied by a copy of the adopted resolution and shall also inform the applicant of applicable time limitations for final plat submittal if the preliminary plat was approved. The approved preliminary plat does not constitute an acceptance of the subdivision, but is deemed to be an authorization to proceed with preparation of the final plat. (Ord. 3398 Sec. 2, 1999.) Section 2. The following section of Chapter 26.28 entitled “Final Plat” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 26.28.010 APPLICATION. (1) Except as provided in subsection (2) below, a final plat meeting all of the requirements of this Chapter shall be submitted to the City Planner Planning Division for approval within seven (7) years of the date of the preliminary plat approval if the date of the preliminary plat approval was on or after January 1, 2008 but before December 31, 2014, and within five (5) years of the date of preliminary plat approval, if the date of preliminary plat approval was on or after January 1, 2015. (2) A final plat meeting all requirements of this Chapter shall be submitted to the City Planner Planning Division for approval within ten (10) years of the date or preliminary plat approval if the project is within the City limits, not subject to the requirements adopted under Chapter 90.48 RCW (Shoreline Management Plan), and the date of the preliminary plat approval was on or before December 31, 2007. (3) A complete application for final plat approval shall consist of ten full sized, four 11x17 paper copies and an electronic copy of the plat. The paper copies together with such supplementary information and certificates which may be required shall be submitted to the Planning Division at least twenty ten days prior to the date sought for final plat approval. Following written notification of corrections or modifications necessary for the final plat, if any, the applicant shall submit a signed, dated and stamped mylar drawing of the subdivision with an updated electronic copy and the applicable bonding instrument as identified in 26.28.050. A bond will only be needed if there are outstanding improvements to complete. (Ord. 4383, 2018; Ord. 4107, 2013; Ord. 4056, 2012; Ord. 3398 Sec. 2, 1999.) 26.28.030 FINAL PLAT CONTENTS. The final plat shall show and contain the following information: (1) Primary control points approved by the City Engineer, and descriptions and ties to such control points, to which all dimensions, angles, bearings, and similar data on the plat shall be referenced; (2) The final plat shall be accompanied by complete field and computation notes showing original or reestablished corners, with description of them and actual traverse showing error of closure and method of balancing, with sketch showing all distances, angles, and calculations required to determine corners and distances of the plat. The allowable error of closure shall not exceed one (1) foot in four thousand (4000) feet (Authority, RCW 58.16.130); (3) Tract boundary lines, right-of-way lines of streets, easements and other rights-of-way, and property lines of residential lots and other sites, with accurate courses, distances, dimensions, or deflection angles, complete curve data for street centerlines and property lines, and other information necessary to reproduce the plat on the ground. Dimensions shall be shown from all angle points and points of curve to lot lines; (4) Name and right-of-way width of each street and other right-of-way, or easement; (5) Locations, dimensions and purpose of any easements; Page 92 of 130 Page 4 of 5 (6) Number, to identify each lot or site with accurate dimensions in feet and hundredths of feet; (7) A table showing the square footage of each lot; (8) Purpose for which sites, other than residential lots, are dedicated or reserved; (9) Location and description of monuments; (10) Reference to recorded subdivision plats of adjoining platted land by recorded name, date and number; (11) Certification by surveyor or engineer certifying to the accuracy of the survey and plat; (12) Statement by the owner dedicating streets; rights-of-way and any other sites for public use; (13) Name of the plat, scale, northpoint and date; (14) Spaces for certificates or approvals of the following officials or agencies: (a) City Manager or Designee. (b) City Planner. (c) City Engineer. (d) County Engineer (where applicable). (e) Franklin County P.U.D. or applicable utility provider. (f) Franklin County Irrigation District #1 (where applicable). (g) Benton Franklin Health District (where applicable). (h) County Assessor. (i) County Treasurer. (j) County Auditor. (15) All signatures shall be in permanent black ink. (Ord. 4383, 2018; Ord. 3398 Sec. 2, 1999.) 26.28.060 ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL. The final approval of a plat is an administrative function not requiring action by the City Council. A final plat shall only be approved if the administrative review process finds the subdivision proposed for final plat approval conforms to all terms of the preliminary plat approval, and said subdivision meets the requirements of Chapter 58.17 RCW, other applicable state laws and this title which requirements were in effect on the date of submission of a fully completed preliminary plat application. The final plat applicant may appeal a determination of the administrative review process by a closed record appeal to the City Council pursuant to PMC 4.02.100. (Ord. 4383, 2018; Ord. 3398 Sec. 2, 1999.) Section 3. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this ____ day of _________________, 2019. __________________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Page 93 of 130 Page 5 of 5 __________________________________ __________________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 94 of 130 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/28/19 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update Process I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution 3845 PowerPoint Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Franklin County and Pasco are required to update their respective Comprehensive Plans through the Growth Management Act. A key component of that update is accommodation of the city’s 20 year population forecast (an additional 51,000 people by the year 2038) which is officially transmitted to the City through Franklin County. That transmittal was received in mid-January of 2018. As a first step in the process, City Council adopted the initial proposed urban expansion area, consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation, through Resolution 3845. This enabled staff to submit the application to Franklin County for consideration. In August and September of this year, the Franklin County Planning Commission held a workshop and public meeting to discuss the City of Pasco’s proposal which includes an additional 4,800 acres of property, generally north and west of the existing urban area to accommodate the OFM population forecast. That proposal caused a number of issues and concern from state agencies and special interest groups. It was decided that in order to minimize the risk of a last minute appeal of the entire Page 95 of 130 Comprehensive Plan update to the Growth Management Hearing Board, a prudent and logical step in the update process is the preparation of a non-project environmental impact statement (EIS). V. DISCUSSION: The EIS process allows for additional detail in the land capacity analysis – which addresses concerns of state agencies; additional opportunities for public meetings and input (Planning Commission, City Council, Franklin County Planning Commission, and likely, the County Commissioners) and preparation of several alternatives for the initial 4800 - acre expansion. The process associated with preparation of an EIS will work greatly in the City’s favor should an appeal occur. The EIS process includes development of a “no action” alternative - use of the City's existing UGA to accommodate our 20 year growth; a second alternative - use of the UGA proposal approved by Resolution 3845 and a third alternative consisting of a lessor expansion area and higher densities. This will allow the land capacity analysis, traffic impact analysis and utility coordination to be further detailed for each alternative which will provide the Planning Commission and Council, state agencies and affected special interest groups additional information. The timeframe for this process to occur is by the end of Summer 2019. That timeframe will need to accommodate a 30-day comment period once the draft EIS is released and the required 60-day review associated with the Washington State Department of Commerce for the final update product. The City's consulting team and staff will provide an update report/presentation to Council. Page 96 of 130 RESOLUTION NO. 5 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE PREFERRED URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY FOR THE CITY OF PASCO. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco and Franklin County are planning under the State Growth Management Act(GMA) of 1990 as amended; and WHEREAS, The GMA (RCW 36.70A.110) requires the establishment of Urban Growth Areas (UGA); and WHEREAS, each city located in Franklin County must be included within a UGA; and WHEREAS, UGA's may include portions of the County already characterized by urban growth or adjacent to urban growth; and WHEREAS, the proposed UGA boundary includes a portion of the Clark Addition, the Desert Drive Area, the Byers Road Area the McDonald Road Area and the Douglas Fruit facilities which are areas characterized by urban type development; and WHEREAS, the proposed UGA boundary is adjacent to the north City limits where schools, schools sites, roads and utilities exits to serve future urban growth in the proposed UGA; and WHEREAS, per RCW 36.70a.110 UGA's are to include a sufficient area of land to accommodate forecasted growth for a 20 year planning period; and WHEREAS, forecasted growth is determined by population projections provided by the State Office of Financial Management(OFM); and WHEREAS, OFM projections indicate Pasco's population will increase by approximately 50,000 for a total population of 121,828 by the year 2038; and, WHEREAS, to address the OFM population projections over 15,000 new residential dwelling units will need to be constructed in Pasco over the next 20 years; and WHEREAS, based on available land the current UGA can only accommodate another 5,000 dwelling units or over 16,000 new residents; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to expand the UGA to accommodate over 10,000 new dwelling units by the year 2018; and WHEREAS, in addition to providing land for anticipated housing RCW 36.70a.110 suggests the UGA must also include areas sufficient to accommodate the Page 1 of 3 Page 97 of 130 broad range of needs and uses that will accompany the projected urban growth including medical, governmental, institutional, commercial, service, retail, other nonresidential uses,parks, greenbelts and open space; and WHEREAS, State and local housing goals encourage the provision of affordable housing(RCW 36.70A.210(3)e&County Policy#6)within the community; and WHEREAS, due to the lack of land within the current UGA land prices have significantly risen recently, as indicated by sales records recorded in the Franklin County Courthouse, impacting the affordability of housing; and WHEREAS, to meet State and local goals to encourage affordable housing the Pasco UGA needs to be expanded; and WHEREAS, the proposed UGA expansion area is constrained on the north by prime irrigated agricultural resource lands making it difficult to provide the area necessary to fully accommodate the OFM projected growth; and WHEREAS, reducing or removing areas from the proposed UGA will not enable the City to meet the mandate (RCW 36.70a.110) of providing sufficient lands for projected urban growth including the requirement to provide for a broad range of land uses; and WHEREAS, removing developable lands adjacent to but not encumbered by the Airport Overlay zones will reduce the City ability to meet the mandates and goals of the Growth Management Act that requires the City to provide enough land to accommodate OFM growth projections and address needs for affordable housing; and WHEREAS, the City has met the need to protect the operations of the Tri-Cities Airport by enacting zoning regulations that implement RCW 36.70.547 that address land use compatibility concerns near the airport; and WHEREAS, Pasco's Airport Overlay regulations incorporate both Federal Aviation Regulation Part 77 requirements and the recommendations of the WSDOT Airport and Compatible Land Use Guide Book; and WHEREAS, on February 15, 2018 and April 19, 2018 the Planning Commission held workshop to study and discuss the need for expanding the Pasco UGA; and WHEREAS, on April 9, 2018 and June 11, 2018 the Pasco City Council held a workshops to discuss the Comprehensive Plan and the UGA; and WHEREAS, on May 9, 2018 City staff met with property owners within the proposed UGA boundaries to receive feedback from the owners and answer questions about the need to expand the UGA to accommodate the OFM population projections; and WHEREAS, on May 17, 2018 Pasco Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive public input on the proposed Pasco UGA; and Page 2 of 3 Page 98 of 130 WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council has determined the Pasco Urban Growth Area boundary must be expanded to permitted the City to properly plan for future growth and meet the requirements of the Growth Management Act; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: Section 1. That the boundary identified in Exhibit "1" is the preferred boundary for the Pasco Urban Growth Area. Section 2. That this resolution be forwarded to Franklin County for its due consideration of the City Council's request for desired the UGA boundary as identified in Exhibit"1". Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 18t1i day of June 2018. 1449 /// Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST:APP ED AS TO FORM: 414 A_ .1 l Daniela Erickson Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney City Clerk Page 3 of 3 Page 99 of 130 IJ r o- 73_ i2 S o U o. xt,. 7 Q C y co N g Z o 4 oo as 114 i. A fA , intj a 0 as 1 1 ammisCOItkN 1O 0a0 C j II 11. r s 1111 .. I.4. r II r • 0, . . r • . ti.. i i•. 4.. ,.. 44:§ 4 14. 1% 1145"- f e.:•:•• r••••: r.' ar e" 1•: a• w• a a P l ate¢ i h 4 M a• Vas: z-ar1•:r:'. 7,..., 70, a t•} iilmIL it1i i:: l k _- S- t f j= I A'''. 41" i IIIw v. O 1 cd 01.‘ 4, T! 11Page 100 of 130 January 28, 2019 City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan Update Pasco City Council Workshop Oneza & Associates In partnership with: White Bluffs Consulting and J-U-B Engineers Page 101 of 130 Council reviewed goals and policies in 2018 Proposed UGA expansion Plan elements are being updated Integrate with other planning efforts (e.g. Broadmoor Sub-area Plan) Background Page 102 of 130 Broad categories: Address water rights Discuss flexibility of the plan and implementation Address current challenges regarding infill, such as lack of sewer, public right of way, incoherent street system Acknowledge economic development efforts with Port of Pasco and TRIDEC City Council Direction Page 103 of 130 Specific goals and policies: Land use designations clarification Avoid giving up existing commercial land for residential development Clarifications in certain policies regarding applicability (e.g. some policies may not be appropriate for each neighborhood) Avoid conflicts in policies, e.g. housing and land use policies City Council Direction Page 104 of 130 Specific goals and policies review: Capital facilities and mitigation Transportation –Level of Service (LOS) standards, bicycle planning, landscaping Economic development –flexibility in redevelopment City Council Direction Page 105 of 130 Initial UGA Expansion Proposal Population projected to increase by 48,238 (by 2038 based on OFM data) City proposed UGA expansion of 4800 acres for additional growth Raised questions from State agencies, special interest groups and public Page 106 of 130 Initial UGA Expansion Proposal Page 107 of 130 Considers range of alternatives and effects Considers impacts on physical and natural affected environment Addresses land capacity analysis in greater detail Provides additional opportunities for public and agency input Development of an EIS Page 108 of 130 A new alternative being developed: Higher density development Requires less area for expansion Three alternatives Alternative 1: No-action Alternative 2: Traditional Growth Target (Original UGA Expansion Proposal) Alternative 3: Compact Growth Target (Modified UGA Expansion Proposal) EIS Alternatives Page 109 of 130 Scoping notice issued in September and comments received in November 2018 Comments have been reviewed Comments compiled and being addressed in draft EIS A land capacity analysis being developed EIS Process Page 110 of 130 Support for preparing EIS Higher density alternative Transportation system (roads/airport) and other infrastructure impacts Characterize impacts to agriculture lands and critical areas/shrub steppe Consider employment forecast and regional availability of industrial lands EIS Scoping Comments Page 111 of 130 Conduct detailed land capacity and densities analysis Characterize impacts on existing water rights and needs/deficiencies Evaluate affordable housing effects Characterize air quality effects EIS Scoping Comments Page 112 of 130 Pasco to grow to accommodate additional 48,238 persons (from 2018 to 2038 based on OFM data) Identifies vacant and under-utilized land in the City and UGA Considers Broadmoor areas development capacity Current capacity -population to accommodate in the City, existing UGA and Broadmoor –about 29,600 persons Still need to accommodate additional 18,609 persons and related businesses and services Land Analysis: supply Page 113 of 130 Land Analysis: demand Low Density Residential –appx. 1600 acres Mixed Density Residential –appx. 250 acres High Density Residential –appx. 100 acres Commercial -appx. 450 acres Public Facilities -appx. 250 acres Parks and Recreation -appx. 250 acres Industrial –appx. 650 acres (moving industrial land from County into City to improve available services/utilities/infrastructure) A total of about 3,550 acres neededPage 114 of 130 EIS Alternative 1: No Action Existing land use and UGA, no expansion for the 20 year growthPage 115 of 130 EIS Alternative 2: Traditional Growth •UGA expansion for the 20 year growth in a traditional pattern •Approximately 4800 acres proposedPage 116 of 130 EIS Alternative 3: Compact Growth •UGA expansion for the 20 year growth in a higher density growth pattern •Approximately 3600 acres proposed •10 year and 20 years growth Page 117 of 130 EIS Alternative 3: Compact Growth •UGA expansion for the 20 year growth in a higher density growth pattern •Approximately 3600 acres proposed •10 year and 20 year boundariesPage 118 of 130 EIS Alternative 3: Compact Growth Potential public facilities and parks land -Consisting of about 15% of the proposed UGA -About 28% of the residential land Low density –42% Mixed Residential –10% High density –4% Commercial –10% Industrial –19% Parks and public land –15% * Includes rowPage 119 of 130 EIS Alternatives UGA Comparisons Page 120 of 130 Traffic and Utilities Evaluation of infrastructure needs Local Improvement District New lift station in the UGA area New Roads and improvement of existing roads Cost estimates Page 121 of 130 Public Participation Timeline in 2018 EIS Alternatives DEIS Development and Plan Update Adoption Jan-Feb Jan -May SEPA Commerce review Sept -Oct UGA application to County Page 122 of 130 Next Steps Address future growth, and facilities needed –transportation, water, sewer Issue draft EIS and Comp Plan –May 2019 UGA expansion application to County - May-June 2019 Department of Commerce 60-day review –June-July 2019 Planning Commission Public Hearing – September 2019 Council adoption –Sept-Oct 2019Page 123 of 130 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 16, 2019 TO: Dave Zabell. City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/28/19 FROM: Steve Worley, Public Works Director Public Works SUBJECT: Bid Award - 14001 Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Bid Tabulation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Fund 450 Sewer - Fund Balance $ 90,747 Fund 450 Sewer - 2017 Revenue Bond $ 3,890,733 Fund 411 Water - Capital Expansion Fee* $ 400,000 Total Project Funding $ 4,381,480 *Budget supplement requested to build an additional water crossing under freeway. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: This project includes installation of approximately 4,000 linear feet of PVC gravity sewer transmission main, two (2) trench-less boring(s) under WSDOT’s right-of-way on Interstate 182, and pavement restoration of portions of Court Street, Road 111, and Harris Road, as necessary. V. DISCUSSION: On January 11, 2018, the City received six (6) bids for construction of the project. For clarification; the (base) bid included full width surface restoration of Harris Road Page 124 of 130 and no allowance of road closure for Harris Road. Alternate B1 allowed for either a credit or debit of paving only half of Harris Road. Alternate C1 allowed for a credit allowing for road closure during construction. With the low (base) bid offers the best final product (full road width restoration) and Alternate B1 being a credit of only $11,077.71 (Half road width surface restoration on Harris Road) as well as Alternate C1 begin a credit of only $17, 937.71 (Credit back to the City to allow full closure of Harris Road) and considering the local residential and commercial traffic that utilizes Harris Road, the recommendation is to award the low (base) bid without alternates. The low (base) bid, without alternate bid items B1 or C1, was from Culbert Construction, Inc. in the amount of $2,412,115.89. The Engineer's construction estimate was $3,998,364.21. This is a critical project, as determined by Council, associated with the 2018-2019 Economic Vitality Goals. Specifically "completion of the Broadmoor sub-area plan and environmental analysis, including plan for needed utilities, and transportation improvements." This project is included in the City's 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan with an expected completion date in 2019. Staff reviewed the bid submittal and found no exceptions or irregularities existed. Therefore, Staff recommends award of the contract to Culbert Construction, Inc. of Pasco, Washington. Page 125 of 130 PROJECT VICINITY MAP HARRIS R OAD Page 126 of 130 Page 127 of 130 FILE: BID DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2017 20th Ave Safety Improvements Bid Summary.pub SHEET of 2 4 Contract No.: CP5-ST-3A-14-06 Fed. Aid No.: HSIP-3551(004) Continued from Previous Sheet CITY OF PASCO N. 20th Ave Safety Improvements Project No. 14006 FILE: BID DATE: JANUARY 11, 2019 Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main Bid Summary.pub Contract No.: CP7-SE-2A-14-02 CITY OF PASCO Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main Project No. 14001 BID SUMMARY Culbert Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main ENGINEER'S Construction, Inc. C & E Trenching Apollo, Inc. Project No. 14001 ESTIMATE Pasco, WA Pasco, WA Kennewick, WA City Contract Number: CP7-SE-2A-14-02 Item Bid Security 5% Bid Bond 5% Bid Bond 5% Bid Bond No. ITEM QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 22 Plastic Stop Line 16 LF 20.00 320.00 30.75 492.00 10.92 174.72 10.92 174.72 23 Protection & Support of Existing Utilities 1 LS 100,000.00 100,000.00 21,798.50 21,798.50 5,462.12 5,462.12 5,462.12 5,462.12 24 Minor Change Force Account 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 25 Record Drawings 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 26 PVC Pipe for Irrigation Main 8 In. Diam 595 LF 75.00 44,625.00 33.15 19,724.25 16.37 9,740.15 16.37 9,740.15 27 Removal of Structures and Obstructions 1 LS 41,000.00 41,000.00 76,595.87 76,595.87 44,869.16 44,869.16 44,869.16 44,869.16 28 Crushed Surfacing Base Course 3,120 TON 40.00 124,800.00 23.50 73,320.00 34.56 107,827.20 34.56 107,827.20 29 Crushed Surfacing Top Course 1,290 TON 45.00 58,050.00 45.77 59,043.30 51.43 66,344.70 51.43 66,344.70 30 HMA Cl. 1/2" Pg 64-22 1,300 TON 100.00 130,000.00 80.38 104,494.00 107.88 140,244.00 107.88 140,244.00 31 Project Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 100,000.00 100,000.00 112,751.34 112,751.34 93,385.90 93,385.90 93,385.90 93,385.90 Subtotal $3,681,735.00 $2,221,101.19 $2,325,688.42 $2,325,688.42 Washington State Sales Tax 8.6% $ 316,629.21 $ 191,014.70 $ 200,009.20 $ 200,009.20 Base Bid Total $3,998,364.21 $2,412,115.89 $2,525,697.62 $2,525,697.62 Bid Alternate B1 $ 80,000.00 $ (11,077.71) $ 25,000.00 $ 65,500.00 Bid Alternate C1 $ (150,000.00) $ (17,937.71) $ (32,000.00) $ (26,000.00) Page 128 of 130 FILE: BID DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2017 20th Ave Safety Improvements Bid Summary.pub SHEET of 3 4 Contract No.: CP5-ST-3A-14-06 Fed. Aid No.: HSIP-3551(004) Continued from Previous Sheet CITY OF PASCO N. 20th Ave Safety Improvements Project No. 14006 FILE: BID DATE: JANUARY 11, 2019 Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main Bid Summary.pub Contract No.: CP7-SE-2A-14-02 CITY OF PASCO Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main Project No. 14001 BID SUMMARY Big D's DW Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main ENGINEER'S Construction Rotschy, Inc. Excavating, Inc. Project No. 14001 ESTIMATE Pasco, WA Vancouver, WA Davenport, WA City Contract Number: CP7-SE-2A-14-02 Item Bid Security 5% Bid Bond 5% Bid Bond 5% Bid Bond No. ITEM QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Mobilization 1 LS 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 325,000.00 255,000.00 255,000.00 249,000.00 249,000.00 2 Pothole Existing Utility 8 EA 1,000.00 8,000.00 2,000.00 16,000.00 500.00 4,000.00 933.00 7,464.00 3 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe 30 In. Diam. 3,994 LF 275.00 1,098,350.00 169.00 674,986.00 165.00 659,010.00 212.00 846,728.00 4 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe 12 In. Diam. 45 LF 100.00 4,500.00 138.00 6,210.00 110.00 4,950.00 200.00 9,000.00 5 PVC Sanitary Sewer Pipe 8 In. Diam. 25 LF 250.00 6,250.00 110.00 2,750.00 100.00 2,500.00 220.00 5,500.00 6 HDPE Sanitary Sewer Pipe 36 In. Diam. 387 LF 100.00 38,700.00 171.00 66,177.00 160.00 61,920.00 226.00 87,462.00 7 Schedule A Culv. Pipe 12 In. Diam 275 LF 30.00 8,250.00 30.00 8,250.00 30.00 8,250.00 63.00 17,325.00 8 Trenchless Crossing and Casing for Sewermain (I-182) 366 LF 1,315.00 481,290.00 924.00 338,184.00 1,060.00 387,960.00 973.00 356,118.00 9 Manhole 60 In. Diam. Type 1 17 EA 20,000.00 340,000.00 9,000.00 153,000.00 7,500.00 127,500.00 7,400.00 125,800.00 10 Manhole Additional Height 60 In. Diameter 110 LF 550.00 60,500.00 100.00 11,000.00 25.00 2,750.00 117.00 12,870.00 11 Manhole 72 In. Diam. Type 1 2 EA 25,000.00 50,000.00 14,000.00 28,000.00 9,200.00 18,400.00 10,000.00 20,000.00 12 Manhole Additional Height 72 In. Diameter 9 LF 600.00 5,400.00 100.00 900.00 35.00 315.00 360.00 3,240.00 13 Gravel Backfill for Pipe Zone Bedding 2,180 TON 35.00 76,300.00 30.00 65,400.00 15.00 32,700.00 38.00 82,840.00 14 Erosion/Water Pollution Control 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 15 Temporary Barriers 400 LF 25.00 10,000.00 10.00 4,000.00 28.00 11,200.00 28.00 11,200.00 16 Roadway Surveying 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 137,200.00 137,200.00 68,000.00 68,000.00 135,000.00 135,000.00 17 Roadside Cleanup 1 LS 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 18 Trenchless Crossing and Casing for Future Watermain (I-182) 366 LF 1,100.00 402,600.00 565.00 206,790.00 625.00 228,750.00 1,328.00 486,048.00 19 Shoring or Extra Excavation Class B 1 LS 100,000.00 100,000.00 125,000.00 125,000.00 11,000.00 11,000.00 77,000.00 77,000.00 20 High Visibility Fence 520 LF 10.00 5,200.00 6.00 3,120.00 4.00 2,080.00 3.00 1,560.00 21 Plastic Line 3,800 LF 2.00 7,600.00 2.00 7,600.00 1.50 5,700.00 1.67 6,346.00 Page 129 of 130 FILE: BID DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2017 20th Ave Safety Improvements Bid Summary.pub SHEET of 4 4 Contract No.: CP5-ST-3A-14-06 Fed. Aid No.: HSIP-3551(004) Continued from Previous Sheet CITY OF PASCO N. 20th Ave Safety Improvements Project No. 14006 FILE: BID DATE: JANUARY 11, 2019 Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main Bid Summary.pub Contract No.: CP7-SE-2A-14-02 CITY OF PASCO Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main Project No. 14001 BID SUMMARY Big D's DW Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main ENGINEER'S Construction Rotschy, Inc. Excavating, Inc. Project No. 14001 ESTIMATE Pasco, WA Vancouver, WA Davenport, WA City Contract Number: CP7-SE-2A-14-02 Item Bid Security 5% Bid Bond 5% Bid Bond 5% Bid Bond No. ITEM QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 22 Plastic Stop Line 16 LF 20.00 320.00 12.00 192.00 10.00 160.00 37.00 592.00 23 Protection & Support of Existing Utilities 1 LS 100,000.00 100,000.00 112,000.00 112,000.00 34,000.00 34,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00 24 Minor Change Force Account 1 LS 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 25 Record Drawings 1 LS 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 26 PVC Pipe for Irrigation Main 8 In. Diam 595 LF 75.00 44,625.00 24.00 14,280.00 35.00 20,825.00 35.00 20,825.00 27 Removal of Structures and Obstructions 1 LS 41,000.00 41,000.00 94,000.00 94,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 100.00 100.00 28 Crushed Surfacing Base Course 3,120 TON 40.00 124,800.00 18.00 56,160.00 18.00 56,160.00 29.00 90,480.00 29 Crushed Surfacing Top Course 1,290 TON 45.00 58,050.00 20.00 25,800.00 20.00 25,800.00 29.00 37,410.00 30 HMA Cl. 1/2" Pg 64-22 1,300 TON 100.00 130,000.00 80.00 104,000.00 105.00 136,500.00 88.85 115,505.00 31 Project Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 100,000.00 100,000.00 136,000.00 136,000.00 110,000.00 110,000.00 155,000.00 155,000.00 Subtotal $3,681,735.00 $2,766,999.00 $2,370,430.00 $3,035,413.00 Washington State Sales Tax 8.6% $ 316,629.21 $ 237,961.91 $ 203,856.98 $ 261,045.52 Base Bid Total $3,998,364.21 $3,004,960.91 $2,574,286.98 $3,296,458.52 Bid Alternate B1 $ 80,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ (30,000.00) $ (40,000.00) Bid Alternate C1 $ (150,000.00) $ (55,000.00) $ (10,000.00) $ (30,000.00) Page 130 of 130