Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018.10.01 Council Meeting PacketRegular Meeting AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. October 1, 2018 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Council members or the public, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately. 5 - 8 (a) Approval of Minutes To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated September 17, 2018. 9 - 10 (b) Bills and Communications To approve claims in the total amount of $3,319,007.33 ($2,043,675.81 in Check Nos. 224691-224943; $497,979.18 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 821368, 821930-821974, 821978-822002, 822011-822048, 822058-822128, 822133-822195; $35,321.22 in Check Nos. 52185-52225; $739,041.26 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30125138-30125663; $2,989.86 in Electronic Transfer No. 518). 11 - 15 (c) 2019 Legislative Priorities To approve Resolution No. 3861, declaring the City's legislative priorities for the 2019 session of the Washington State Legislature. 16 - 24 (d) *Road Easement Vacation: Sedona Apartments (MF# VAC 2018-005) To approve Resolution No. 3862, a resolution setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 5, 2018, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating the road easement at 1327 North 24th Avenue. (RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Page 1 of 368 Regular Meeting October 1, 2018 25 - 30 (a) Yard and Business of the Month Awards Mayor Watkins to present Certificates of Appreciation for September 2018 "Yard of the Month" and "Business Appearance of the Month" to: • Robert & Sharon Hoffmann, 526 N. 8th Avenue • Jerry & Shelley Larson, 3815 W. Park Street • Janet Taggares, 3811 Desert Plateau Drive • BJ & Merry Loew, 8405 W. Richardson Road • Washington Physical Therapy, 3807 W. Court Street 5. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: This item is provided to allow citizens the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council o r to express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. 6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: (a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers 31 - 33 (b) General Fund Operating Statement 7. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO: 34 - 36 (a) Special Permit Appeal: Mor-Stor Mini Storage Expansion in a C-1 Zone (MF# APPL 2018-002) MOTION: I move to continue the Closed Record Hearing to the October 15, 2018 Regular Council Meeting. 8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: 37 - 98 (a) 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3863, approving the Capital Improvement Plan for calendar years 2019-2024. 99 - 106 (b) Ordinance modifying PMC 5.04.010 Business License Definitions and PMC 5.04.170 Business License Exemptions Page 2 of 368 Regular Meeting October 1, 2018 MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4397, amending PMC Section 5.04.010 "Definitions"; amending PMC Section 5.04.170 "Exemptions"; and, further, authorize publication by summary only. 107 - 123 (c) Sale of City Property on Dradie Street MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3864, approving the sale of certain real property on Dradie Street. 124 - 207 (d) Q*Preliminary Plat: Serrano Heights (MF# PP 2018-007) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3865, approving the Preliminary Plat for Serrano Heights 208 - 261 (e) Q* Special Permit: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-4 Zone (MF# SP 2018-007) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3866, granting a special permit for the location of wireless communication facilities at 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E. 262 - 312 (f) Q*Special Permit: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in a C-1 Zone (MF# SP 2018-008) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3867, granting a special permit for the location of wireless communication facilities at 115 South 10th Avenue. 313 - 368 (g) Q*Special Permit: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-S-1 Zone (MF# SP 2018-009) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3868, granting a special permit for the location of wireless communication facilities at 5304 Burden Boulevard. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 10. NEW BUSINESS: 11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 13. ADJOURNMENT. (RC) Roll Call Vote Required Page 3 of 368 Regular Meeting October 1, 2018 * Item not previously discussed Q Quasi-Judicial Matter MF# “Master File #....” REMINDERS: 1. Monday, October 1, 1:30 p.m., Emergency Medical Services Board Meeting – Fire Training Center, 1811 S. Ely, Kennewick (COUNCILMEMBER BLANCHE BARAJAS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Alt.) 2. Thursday, October 4, 5:30 p.m., Parks & Recreation Advisory Board – P&R Classroom, Pasco City Hall (COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER SAUL MARTINEZ, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability. (Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad.) Page 4 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 24, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes I. REFERENCE(S): Minutes 09.17.18 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated September 17, 2018. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 5 of 368 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Ruben Alvarado, Craig Maloney, Saul Martinez, David Milne, Pete Serrano, and Matt Watkins. Excused: Blanche Barajas. Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager; Leland Kerr, City Attorney; Steve Worley, Public Works Director; Michael Morales, Deputy Community & Economic Development Director; Zach Ratkai, Administrative & Community Services Director and Bob Metzger, Police Chief. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of Minutes To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated September 4, 2018. Bills and Communications To approve claims in the total amount of $2,226,194.76 ($834,568.71 in Check Nos. 224433-224690; $421,389.26 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 822008, 822049- 822051, 822054; $43,319.08 in Check Nos. 52128-52184; $926,917.71 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30124584-30125137. To approve bad debt write-off for Utility Billing, Ambulance, Cemetery, General Accounts, Miscellaneous Accounts, and Municipal Court (non-criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of $324,114.70 and, of that amount, authorize $185,064.34 to be turned over for collection. Downtown Pasco Development Authority Appointment To confirm the Mayor's appointment of Gabriel Portugal to Position No. 4 on the Downtown Pasco Development Authority Board, with the expiration date of 12/20/2020. MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to approve the Consent Agenda as read. Mr. Maloney seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Presentation of Proclamation for "Attendance Awareness Month" Mayor Watkins presented a Proclamation to LoAnn Ayers, President & CEO United Way of Benton-Franklin Counties, proclaiming September 2018, "Attendance Awareness Month." Page 6 of 368 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: Kyle Saltz - Senior Vice Commander for VFW. VFW can be utilized to assist with help for homeless and needy vets and provide other services to include funeral services free of charge. Jeffrey Robinson commented on the loss of Sen. John McCain and how his vision compliments that of the newly created Inclusivity Commission. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: Verbal Reports from Councilmembers • Mr. Alvarado attended Benton Franklin Council of Governments Policy Advisory Committee meeting. At the meeting they discussed having more cohesive communications. • Mr. Maloney attended the Public Market Meeting and the group received draft input from the consultant. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO: Special Permit Appeal: Mor-Stor Mini Storage Expansion in a C-1 Zone (MF# APPL 2018-002) MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to continue the Closed Record Hearing to the October 1, 2018 Regular Council Meeting. Mr. Alvarado seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 2019 Legislative Priorities Presentation (moved up from New Business) Presented by Briahna Murray and Josh Weiss with Gordon Thomas Honeywell - Governmental Affairs. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: Wrigley Drive Extension Funding STP Transfer MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3859 to transfer federal Surface Transportation Program (STP) grant funds from the Dual Right Turn SB Road 68 Project to the Wrigley Drive Extension Project. Mr. Serrano seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Sale of City Property on "A" Street MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to approve Resolution No. 3860, approving the sale of certain real property on "A" Street. Mr. Serrano seconded. Motion carried unanimously. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: Rezone: RT (Residential Transition) to C-3 (General Business) (Pati Hull) (MF# Z 2018-005) MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to accept the applicant's withdrawal of rezone application, Master File # Z 2018-005, for the property described as Short Plat Page 7 of 368 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 99-22, Lot 2 located at 3004 E. George Street; also known as Parcel # 113 780 104. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: Bid Award: 17003 Columbia East Pump Station MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to award the 17003 Columbia East Pump Station project to Clearwater Construction & Management, LLC. in the amount of $2,669,751.00 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents. Mr. Milne seconded. Motion carried unanimously. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: Mr. Zabell mentioned that the CIP Plan Presentation would be next Monday at the Workshop Meeting beginning at 6:00 p.m. Also, the second Columbia Rivershore Reconveyance Meeting will be held on Thursday, September 20th from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. at TRAC. Mr. Alvarado commended the Pasco Police on how well they handled the Shooting/Suicide that occurred last weekend in the Tierra Vida Neighborhood. Mayor Watkins commented on the Alumni of the Year honor and recognition he received from Columbia Basin College last week. Also, the Cable Bridge turned 40 years old this past Sunday. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:21 p.m. PASSED AND APPROVED this 1st day of October 2018. APPROVED: ATTEST: Matt Watkins, Mayor Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Page 8 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 27, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Director Finance SUBJECT: Bills and Communications I. REFERENCE(S): Accounts Payable 10.01.18 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve claims in the total amount of $3,319,007.33 ($2,043,675.81 in Check Nos. 224691-224943; $497,979.18 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 821368, 821930-821974, 821978-822002, 822011-822048, 822058-822128, 822133-822195; $35,321.22 in Check Nos. 52185-52225; $739,041.26 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30125138- 30125663; $2,989.86 in Electronic Transfer No. 518). III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 9 of 368 REPORTING PERIOD: October 1, 2018 Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined Check Numbers 224691-224943 52185-52225 Total Check Amount $2,043,675.81 $35,321.22 Total Checks 2,078,997.03$ Electronic Transfer Numbers 821368 30125138-30125663 518 821930-821974 821978-822002 822011-822048 822058-822128 822133-822195 Total EFT Amount $497,979.18 $739,041.26 $2,989.86 $0.00 Total EFTs 1,240,010.30$ Grand Total 3,319,007.33$ Councilmember 763,159.65 32,655.52 0.00 548.38 10,000.00 0.00 3,902.25 23,588.21 9,209.40 3,852.00 75,776.99 1,530.59 2,832.60 10,339.29 0.00 647.31 0.00 24,525.36 11,565.64 0.00 657,237.68 309,072.86 16,357.96 6,805.92 193,825.56 0.00 82,939.35 0.00 0.00 1,078,634.81 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:3,319,007.33$ EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT BUSINESS MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE OLD FIRE OPEB FLEX PAYROLL CLEARING STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER LID GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION UTILITY, WATER/SEWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS LITTER ABATEMENT REVOLVING ABATEMENT PARKS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ATHLETIC PROGRAMS GOLF COURSE SENIOR CENTER OPERATING MULTI-MODAL FACILITY RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN C.D. BLOCK GRANT HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT NSP GRANT MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER AMBULANCE SERVICE CEMETERY Councilmember SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERAL FUND STREET STREET OVERLAY City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim. Dave Zabell, City Manager Richa Sigdel, Finance Director We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this 1st day of October, 2018 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment: September 13 - 26, 2018 C I T Y O F P A S C O Council Meeting of: Accounts Payable Approved The City Council Page 10 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 27, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager Executive SUBJECT: 2019 Legislative Priorities I. REFERENCE(S): 2019 Legislative Priorities Proposed Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ________, declaring the City's legislative priorities for the 2019 session of the Washington State Legislature. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The 2019 legislative session will begin on January 14, 2019. This will be the first year of a biennial cycle where the primary responsibility of the legislature is to pass a budget. Commonly referred to as the "long session", on odd numbered years, the session lasts 105 days including weekends and state recognized holidays. This will precede the second year of the two-year cycle, where the legislature is tasked with implementing supplemental budgets during a shorter 60-day session. The City contracts with Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs (GTHGA) to assist in promoting the Council's legislative priorities to the Washington State Legislature. GTHGA assists the City Council in developing a comprehensive legislative agenda and furthering that agenda in Olympia to promote economic development and the vitality of the growing City and, provides an on-the-ground presence in Olympia during session, monitors the state legislature throughout the year, and advances the City's legislative agenda accordingly. The City has maintained a proactive posture with the legislature regarding the interests of Pasco. One means by which Council has historically made its concerns and interests known to the legislature, and specificall y its legislative delegation, is through the Page 11 of 368 adoption of its City Legislative Priorities Statement. V. DISCUSSION: Attached is the proposed 2019 legislative priorities list which reflects modifications to the previous agenda as recommended by staff and the legislative consultant, Briahna Murray, Vice President, Gordon Thomas Honeywell Governmental Affairs. The proposed changes consider changed circumstances over the past year, so that draft priorities for Council's consideration more accurately reflect current circumstances, Council's overall policy direction and the likelihood of success. The 2019 legislative session will be largely occupied by the adoption of biennial operating, capital, and transportation budgets. While state revenues continue to ex ceed expectations, with so much of the legislature's efforts over the past few years focused on addressing the McCleary decision, there appears to be significant pent up demand to spend new state dollars. As part of preliminary discussions around the budget, the legislature is anticipated to have a robust discussion around tax policy. It is anticipated that proposals concerning carbon tax, capital gains tax, closing tax loopholes, and other tax policy changes will be discussed in greater detail this upcoming session. There is some early dialogue around a small transportation funding package to fund some key projects that were omitted from the 16-year schedule of projects, though the political viability of a “mini package” is unclear at present. Beyond budget and tax policy, it is anticipated that the legislature will also address significant policy issues such as: mental health services, affordable housing, education construction, head tax preemption, internet sales taxes, culvert funding (fish passage), economic development (tools), small cell technology deployment, broadband expansion, Basic Law Enforcement Academy funding, and indigent defense funding. The 2019 session will be busy on all of these fronts. The GTHGA team will present Council with an overview of the upcoming session as well as discuss the attached list of priorities. Staff requests Council direction so that the priorities list can be put in resolution form for Council action at its October 1, 2018 regular meeting. Page 12 of 368 RESOLUTION NO. __________ A RESOLUTION declaring the City’s legislative priorities for the 2019 session of the Washington State Legislature. WHEREAS, the 2019 session of the Washington State Legislature commences on January 14; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, as a municipal corporation and subdivision of the state, can be substantially affected by the actions of the legislature; and WHEREAS, the City Council has evaluated conditions impacting the City and opportunities to improve the services the City provides to its citizenry; and WHERAS, the City Council desires to identify its legislative priorities for the 2019 legislative session so they can be provided to state legislators prior to commencement of the next legislative session; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the legislative objectives stated herein below constitute the priorities of the City of Pasco for the 2019 legislative session.  PEANUTS COMMUNITY PLAZA and FARMERS MARKET: At the epicenter of downtown Pasco is Peanuts Park, the primary and historic gathering place for the community. The park is the heart of a culturally diverse downtown core. The City is leveraging this project, as part of a bundle of projects to revitalize the downtown core, enhance economic opportunities for the agricultural community and provide the public greater access to locally grown produce. Design for these improvements is expected to be complete in the spring of 2019 with construction to commence shortly thereafter. Considerable public outreach was part of the master planning process and as a result the project enjoys significant public support. The City requests $3 million in funding for Phase 1 of this project to revitalize the downtown plaza and farmers market structures, upgrading this important community gathering place in a way that will spur economic development.  PROCESS WATER REUSE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I: The City requests $3 million for improvements to the City’s industrial wastewater treatment facility which supports a very successful food processing cluster and farmers within the region. These proposed conveyance, rehabilitation and treatment improvements will improve the reliability of the facility and allow for the needed and planned expansion in productivity of current food processors utilizing the facility and create capacity for additional processors. This project is necessary to support the current processors and farmers benefitting from the plant and allow for growth of the Pasco Ag Processing Cluster.  ALLOW CITY PUBLIC FACILITY DISTRICT TO FUND AQUATIC CENTER: The Pasco Public Facility District (PFD) would like to fund and construct an aquatic center. Page 13 of 368 2019 Legislative Priorities Resolution Page 2 Regional and county PFDs are authorized to construct “recreational facilities”; however, city PFDs are not. The City requests legislation or a local tool to bring this project to fruition.  INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING (TIB & PWAA): The City of Pasco has several significant infrastructure projects that are too expensive to fund solely with local funding, including; Lewis Street Overpass project replaces a deteriorating and functionally obsolete 1937 underpass on a former state highway; Argent Road, widening and improving safety, capacity and multi-modal opportunities in the immediate vicinity of the Tri-Cities Airport in Pasco, Columbia Basin College and nearby commercially zoned properties. The City requests that the Legislature fund key infrastructure funding programs, including the Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) and the Public Works Assistance Account (PWAA) to provide adequate funding sources to complete these projects. Specifically, the City requests that the legislature return funding streams, such as the utility tax and real estate excise tax revenues, to the PWAA.  BASIC LAW ENFORCEMENT ACADAMY (BLEA) FUNDING: The City of Pasco supports increased funding and other solutions to ensure newly hired officers are able to complete training through the Basic Law Enforcement Academy (BLEA) at the Criminal Justice Training Commission in a timely manner. At current funding levels, the Criminal Justice Training Commission has a backlog of officers awaiting training. State law requires that officers are trained within 6 months of hire. The current backlog exceeds this statutory timeline. This results in law enforcement agencies throughout the state hiring new officers, and then keeping them on staff for upwards of 6 months, unable to perform police work until their training is complete.  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOLS: The City of Pasco joins the Association of Washington Cities in encouraging the State to reinvigorate economic development programs currently in statute that now remain unfunded, such as the Local Revitalization Fund (LRF), the Local Infrastructure Financing Tool (LIFT), the Job Development Fund (JDF), and others. Additionally, Pasco supports establishing a tax increment financing or value capture financing program, similar to what is established in other states.  DEFEND LOCAL CONTROL: The City of Pasco believes the best governmental decisions are those that are made closest to the people represented. Cities possess strong local authority to provide for the safety and welfare of their residents, and the Legislature must abstain from restricting, mandating, or otherwise interfering with local decisions. The City of Pasco will oppose legislative actions that are inconsistent with this view. Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed to inform state legislators and other appropriate parties of the City’s 2019 legislative priorities. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at its regular meeting this _______ day of October, 2018. Matt Watkins, Mayor Page 14 of 368 2019 Legislative Priorities Resolution Page 3 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 15 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 25, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Darcy Bourcier, Planner I Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Road Easement Vacation: Sedona Apartments (MF# VAC 2018-005) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Resolution Overview Map Vicinity Map Vacation Petition II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No._____, a resolution setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 5, 2018, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating the road easement at 1327 North 24th Avenue. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The property owner of the Sedona Apartments has petitioned for the vacation of a road easement on the property addressed 1327 North 24th Avenue. The road easement in question is being used as an interior driveway and parking lot. The petition requires the City Council to fix a public hearing to consider the vacation request. The earliest regular City Council meeting available for a public hearing which provides the statutory 20-day hearing notice is November 5, 2018. V. DISCUSSION: Page 16 of 368 Per PMC 12.40 the Council may require compensation for vacated easements. The compensation involves obtaining a title report and appraisal of value. However, the compensation and the requirements attached thereto may be waived if one or more of the following conditions apply: 1. The vacation is initiated by the City Council by Resolution; 2. The vacation is at the request of the City; 3. The right-of-way/easement to be vacated was previously determined by the City Council not to be essential to public traffic circulation and available for vacation; 4. The grant of substitute right-of-way/easement which has a value as a right-of- way/easement at least equal to that right-of-way/easement to be vacated; and 5. The resulting benefit to the community of the project requiring the vacation outweighs the appraised value of the right-of-way/easement to be vacated. The 20-foot road easements on the property were dedicated to the City in February of 1978. The reasoning behind the dedication is unknown as the easement only serves the adjacent apartment complex. Page 17 of 368 RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION SETTING 7:00 PM, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2018 AS THE TIME AND DATE TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VACATING THE ROAD EASEMENT AT 1327 NORTH 24TH AVENUE. WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate road easements; and WHEREAS, a petition for the vacation of the road easement at the Sedona Apartments has been submitted to the City; and, WHEREAS, the vacation process provided in PMC 12.40 requires a title report and an appraisal of value and compensation unless waived by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council may waive the requirement for a title report, an appraisal of value and compensation if the Council has previously determined the street/easement in question can be vacated; and, WHEREAS, the vacation in question does not involve street right-of-way and therefore Council may choose not to require compensation for the vacation; and, WHEREAS, the road easement proposed for vacation was dedicated to the City of Pasco in February of 1978. Said easement is being used as an interior driveway and parking lot; and, WHEREAS, a public hearing is needed for the Council to more fully make a reasoned determination on the need for compensation to offset the loss of the road easement as the result of the proposed vacation, and; WHEREAS, RCW 35.79 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: Section 1. Compensation of Vacated Easement: Pursuant to PMC 12.40 the City Council hereby reserves the right to require an appraisal, survey, submittal of a title report and payment of compensation for the proposed vacation, and; Section 2. Notice of Hearing: That a public hearing to consider vacating the road easement at 1327 North 24th Avenue will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on November 5, 2018. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1st day of October, 2018. _____________________________ Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Daniela Erickson Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney Page 18 of 368 City of Pasco, IS Division OverviewMap Item : Easement Vacation - Sedona ApartmentsApplicant: Knutzen EngineeringFile #: VAC2018-005 ± SITE 0 150 300 450 60075FeetN 26th AveW Court St N 22nd AveN 24th AveW Marie St W Octave StPage 19 of 368 City of Pasco, IS Division VicinityMap Item : Easement Vacation - Sedona ApartmentsApplicant: Knutzen EngineeringFile #: VAC2018-005 ± 0 60 120 180 24030Feet N 22nd AveN 24th AveW Marie StPage 20 of 368 FEE S300 CITY OF PASCO STREET /ALLEY VACATION PETITION MASTER FILE a yA DATE SUBMXTTED:__3_[1|_,Qi___,._ I,we :11:;::d(-rsigncd,owners of two—Lhirds of the privately owned abutting property hvrcby pv...!ix,>n my City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the follawing described s'_re£:t/alley rights-of-way: SEC MTMHVO APPLICANT:CH Pasco LL-C PROPERTY OWNED Print Name:CH Pasco LLC PARCEL ''119332063 Sign Nmnc: Address"1 Phvnz’=‘\ _ ‘Q37/1<( 2;;’3"£“"’5’*"mM«mg,(<‘/on 74U /4 Aux'/V Print Name:L';"‘’‘‘' ‘/1’?747 6-D‘/(7 Sign Name: ____‘__>_‘ Date Prmt Name-: $i;_.;r N:i,me: M ____ 7______V_?V ______ Date [pd:u:d 7.18.2017 Page 21 of 368 lc9vD.I:..snuti..l;35l I....25.it.u~uH~\.!B.\..1B.o\.hz5r.8: MOZRJOIqz??mxso &zmz¢b<_mm¢m$w.wm.m<mm.<.mm<o I»!.43.yr9 can3.:B3.31::OI.Y.zcufacr£33...3.. » _r.miss!?ll EI@124--O-cg] hiieln l.l¢|cl.3lnl¢ §53..BqI. k??? 7.5 E nus?aasu-.3 1-~W3Hag22:;£8:aux-».a=n...s..n.-_.z = I. ‘'77-'uL5.'5.io~‘'' ?ridf?k?f?l?ll -sl!!R.1ta.m x . _.hl:.nl .\<..Itla{ . arias! .....h..r.........; . .5.3. ..u..;. ..8I...-313:.35I_iRu...)-8.3 243E. .2 vhPn..a.l..IPKI.Bto:l:53.... Page 22 of 368 '130 an em:«oft :’',. 877621 7 V 7' _..,3 EASEMENT V .- N!I vulunblooouudnxnlbn.rsulpt at which I:hulby Icklwwlodzad.ch:Grimm‘.......,. ,...9!‘J99...5.Tl$t3;m'M!J'4...T.'1‘1;...,.,.,....,. .., ‘nmby ;1Iu$.‘.....IM wnvor‘......to nu amm muum nu ulna,an um.prtvuugama uunmuyto cmtm¢.1nprm,npou-and mnxntun ..Am1.zmd.vuu.unnm. ucrou.nmr ind upon the Wu.Joan:"122'.at 'port£.on quukr 02.010 Jim-uh due:-thud u-roll:/w mm.mm m.......'.nmkno.mm...Oou.nty,lcauolNM‘7.0’'0!(Jul Wilt U7‘and KM hot 20 9!@110 But,_n wuré urn of ma ?orchuoll quarter at rthn D‘m*fIwu§:’ 1 avu"m"e!Boauon 9.5.rwnlhip 9 North.Hum 7.9 :.w.u..3‘ :BNDNINQ M.tho Sauzhnnt anrmr at um [Int 6-nanm T"|'.m‘iVIIar¢hnr'|y 0107!!I ?u nu.Mm '9!and ‘Ian.wan.6 usfdl ‘$8.92 fun "?lINz“!.Uuurly to A putrmonanSlut.‘line of ma New 6 urn:whtnh 1-MM‘Wu 136.16 rent from ?ulaud-wu’L aormlr thuruofr 1119*/??li?mrbhnrlv Along uld tint ‘um ‘I'L9.l;6hot H:uh:rsouzhmnt no:-Mr nl‘um want 6 umup 'TIl.|W:l;Cum-1y dang Qouthviim «F Iuh!Nut 6 Ann:119tho point.as‘lar.1m1£m;;IKEEFTvan ?oimuM1!Mnth»VealA5"?HCEPT tho --In‘,)4‘(ant um-not;ANDEl'TE’P‘Y'nauntv rain, The Onnkon...mu make no Im ol the land occupied by 1:14.. mm !or.........-.......................... In annulus cmrmmheron:3-nntcd,tho Ornnm..... and npul aver “M”V'V"HFl5UIII-r-I .nm:IuImI Ind Autpu.my p?ll my cut And roman burgh,manand cum nbstrumano which In In»opinion of tin:ammo. ,in- mmo vma,,,..............,.‘ Th:covmnmherein conmmd munrun with tho lmd And ll’!Ilndlnaupon all Iublqumtwhenunreal. Thnwntorikwotmd 3,,,.,..dn|Ihapulll|lvIuI,nndnM- Ame dutnnt on either mo (mm.I prlnoipul scour line now»said877821 MID '‘K?on§§.£'3%‘ 9 1......WI.‘ 7glggI€'/ifs:M1,;ms :2:sFH'|' comm mm um M II SW y H‘ 0: dug 1y/ [.1 .791%m_9],“) more than ......, land. (76 0.y : in wltuu Whnuhno all Ountorm.nu...meuudthn Inumnaun tho...IDM.9! anyu.-...mr.wz...'..........,....207° gv_,-‘wanzumrnms, vmm.|..:na«m,nun,vb,um I _-—-:13»,--V-;w..~~ L=m»-ga £12 ,_—.,. i:§7°76zi‘" ,,} Page 23 of 368 -1 377621 HTATI OF WMIWIWIUN, . II.KINIJIVIUVAL AVKNOWLEGMHTKW canny u.,, I,..‘§’.0,':4.*.'.7.*!..3.n99,9? .¢,,,,1A|t.1M..., ..!L!!’1'.‘.1.‘.".l’...............Dornndu -puma um .......... .h.MDMl..¢mB;.Il'M...:...'?932?..':'.'!'.'.’.'P."J.'.'.!:..¥.".’3a........,...... Inuulnonwpolv?d?...lawman iwmuuuuuvuvuunhneunb no uhwiinuoenm NM!!!IPIIMHIn Ind 10!VII Maid of Wuhlulon.ruldlm ,,,7.}.r...................nanumum:ymuouuu.....F*?‘.*!‘.':’.L.,.... 78Milt. ..J10.and -um an an u...,...’1L'..‘......!ru onenwnunnot and am for u»«nu mecuriousnun:intend. own:won at new up emu»um......tmr:b.du....................L:un: VE'.I.¥2r.“.b!‘x.. RIE11’OF WAYE1 3'7‘76;.’,1 w 10"“W Page 24 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council August 22, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Dan Dotta, Facilities Division Manager Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Yard and Business of the Month Awards I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Mayor Watkins to present Certificates of Appreciation for September 2018 "Yard of the Month" and "Business Appearance of the Month" to: • Robert & Sharon Hoffmann, 526 N. 8th Avenue • Jerry & Shelley Larson, 3815 W. Park Street • Janet Taggares, 3811 Desert Plateau Drive • BJ & Merry Loew, 8405 W. Richardson Road • Washington Physical Therapy, 3807 W. Court Street III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 25 of 368 wan..5a3uOwe3.an...E5:w>_U .muu£...ohowBm?mxuus.»nmamars:vanmwn?us?ohsm.5?»ma b?amnWain:BE3wva?$:uEu>o.:mEm2.3.3mm:we5:2...wasuso?xuwaw ~$_:=EEouuu?soaso?nnmbdou.59»now8332».50mmoumxumauauau>> .._.E.ZOEmgnoQM<?. 2z<E,.EoEzoma?mmwsmmmom Kcu=3~.~ m><~.~.n%.2mam uu?umDuU—.—Ou&mmoummm.«OuseW0=U—.=—OU25. :oBEuEowREn®9390‘F30 oomcavwe3.0 Page 26 of 368 .m..u5ohawBm?axm?oowamumagnum«Eamwnmvnsohnm.39»ac .3339Raga:ma:3avg:mu=uEu>o.~mEmw?.33:mo525.5wasanwasumunw mamns??auvnmgcano?snmb?cu.59»yawwv??mhw.5:mmuumxu.322w>> ..rE.ZOSmm...monmsr 203:3xm?mmmxwbani KcuEc~.~ hmv-~<n~.>>Ema uu?umDuvscummmoumumMO23W0—mU—.=.—Omv0£..—.. so?swomxmwow?M?9399‘\SLmU oomsauwe35 Page 27 of 368 8&3:.m=.U>.§>.»“H3: 28..~wa—3uOwe.3..3£55:0 daw?onewo?m?wxvE...»manm:_>.§UGNmwnmvauohsm.59»mo buuunWanna:053mvm?mu:uEu>oumEm23hamu:mob__....&canEm?numunu .m::=EEou_u..m>>3?o?snmbnou.59»new...u3=Emuse3.293.332ES .._.E.ZO2HEBmoQM<>a mm~:.Gw<,m525 K:m=3~.~ EEMQ:<E..3...~bimm?Humm 3333vsoummmoumummoEMU2.:we:u=:oU>309:. :oBEum%§N.G®?ay\Bx$U 8.069we35 Page 28 of 368 sums:\m=.5tESta: .w.55onew?m?mxmvoowamamagnumwasmw?mv?sohsm.59»mo 333$_m.:5m:353UUMEma:mEu>o.EEm2.:ha.um:moF?msw«Eme?msmaumu?u.$_:=EEoum..~m>>3GOmu§Dm.H——~OUuse.»uowm???muwuse329.....325:w>> ..E._.ZO2HEBmoQ~_.<>.. Ewenhim:.w3 Hau_=c~.~ Q<OM~zomQm<=u-~.3MGVW 3233vnoummmoummmmo359:ma=u:=oUEUugh :oBEum%§N.G$9:8‘\s.:mU 8.06%we35 Page 29 of 368 8?:.m=.c:ES3:: man..,.x_2uoweEu.3£5530 .9550acmEm?axm.25»amuwnt?umvanmmsmvcsohsm.39»wo Esau:Gina:933wuss.B:mEu>o.EE_useasaw:ma5:25min«:mE:u_.Eu bmss??cuvu?souuotsnmhuoo:5.»now2.33%»uuomwuumxu.322.o>> .9258z§<.,_.E<Ezosan8mmmzaa. >.:.£mm....u<u~m>mn~ZOHUZ:.~m.<>> Kcu?o? smmmemH-50_U.>>Namm avianDuvsoummmcummmWCQ?uMO—wU—H3DUO£.._... 2QwpGmum&%%§%9:3‘\3«$U oomcauwe35 Page 30 of 368 CommentsApril, May, Oct, Nov when taxes are receivedGENERAL FUND REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES: YTD revenue exceed expenditure by $2,141,437 compared to $218,083 in 2017 during the same period. Large part of this difference between the two years can be attributed to the sale of city property in 2018. With the exception of the revenue from sale of the property, 2018 year-end projection is for expenditures to exceed revenue by $210,000, mostly due to one time investments being made by the City to move to SEACOMM. At this time, we expect the revenue and expenses to track with budget as planned by the end of the year. Fund Balance reserves help to stabilize operations for unexpected adverse fluctuations in revenue or expenditure actual amounts. $0$5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000$45,000$50,000JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DECThousands2018 CUMULATIVE GENERAL FUND REVENUE & EXPENDITURES2018 Cumulative Revenue2018 Cumulative Expenditures4‐Yr Average Rev4‐Yr Average ExpPage 31 of 368 GENERAL FUND END FUND BALANCE HISTORY: The City designates the fund balance into two categories, restricted and unrestricted. The unrestricted fund balance represents funds the City sets aside as a stabilization fund, the intent of which is to smooth over unexpected fluctuations in revenues and expenditures. The fund balance is normally built up when revenues exceed expenditures. The 2017 fund balance is lower than prior year due to accrual of an additional pay period as recommended by State Auditor's Office. This accural was not a standard practice for the City in prior years.2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Estimated 2018 BudgetedRestricted633424 598779 5369708 442300 600000 600000Unrestricted5611795 8784382 11919407 14190914 13214866 12900000 $- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 $20,000$'s ThousandsGeneral Fund - Fund Balance Trend Page 32 of 368 Page 33 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 27, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Darcy Bourcier, Planner I Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit Appeal: Mor-Stor Mini Storage Expansion in a C-1 Zone (MF# APPL 2018-002) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to continue the Closed Record Hearing to the October 15, 2018 Regular Council Meeting. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On May 17, 2018 the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider an application for the expansion of the Mor-Stor Mini Storage Facility to be located at the southwest corner of Road 68 and Court Street. After deliberations at the June 21, 2018 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended the special permit be approved with the conditions listed in the Staff Report. The applicant appealed the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the special permit with the conditions listed, and Council scheduled a Closed Record Hearing to consider the appeal at the August 20, 2018 meeting. At the Closed Record Hearing on August 20, 2018, Council approved a motion to continue this item to the September 4, 2018 Council Meeting and on September 4, 2018, Council moved to continue the item to the September 17, 2018 Council Meeting in order to give staff and legal counsel the opportunity to negotiate an agreement for resolution of the appeal. Page 34 of 368 The applicant's attorney will be out of town until the second week of October and there remain minor wording revisions on the conditions of approval to work through with the applicant. A final continuation has been requested. V. DISCUSSION: The owner/applicant has again indicated that there are no complications from this request for additional time. Staff requests Council concurrence on the postponement until the October 15th, Council Meeting Page 35 of 368 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community OverviewMap Special Permit: Mini-Storage ExpansionApplicant: Melina PuckettFile #: SP2018-005 ± SITE 0 300 600 900 1,200150Feet W Court St Road 64Road 68Road 72Road 76CITY L IMITS Page 36 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 26, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Director Finance SUBJECT: 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan I. REFERENCE(S): Capital Improvement Plan Presentation Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ________, approving the Capital Improvement Plan for calendar years 2019-2024. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None. Budget appropriations for Capital Projects are made through the biennial Operating and Capital budget process. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The proposed six-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which identifies the various capital projects expected to be undertaken each year and the method of financing for each, is essential for effective financial and capital planning for the City. The plan is fiscally constrained, meaning that the plan could be accomplished with the funds reasonably expected to be available. Execution of CIP projects, particularly in the outward years, is reliant on anticipated grants, bonds, which will in part require rate adjustments, or other factors as discussed in the Plan. Approval of the CIP itself does not bind the City Council to future actions. Development of the CIP occurs as a prelude to the biennial budget. The first two years of the adopted CIP are largely incorporated into the subsequent annual budget document. Page 37 of 368 V. DISCUSSION: The staff presentation highlighted projects which are critical to the Council goals and objectives. As previously discussed, the CIP is a plan and, as such, requires annual updating to reflect changing conditions and priorities. The CIP identifies secured and unsecured revenue sources to highlight the funding status of each project. The proposed 2019-2024 CIP was presented to Council for discussion at the September 24th Council Workshop meeting. Following Council consideration and discussion of the Plan, the Peanuts Park Project was modified to reflect a Phase II project, in addition the Parks and Recreation sub-total and Plan total reflect a corresponding increase. Below is a summary of CIP Projects proposed for 2019 -2024. An updated Plan document will be distributed within the next several weeks reflecting the change discussed and a summary of completed projects which have been removed from the Plan, as discussed during the Workshop presentation. Page 38 of 368 Page 39 of 368 Overview Funding 6% 9% 11% 10% 19% 30% 13% Facilities Fire & Ambulance Parks & Recreation PWRF Sewer Transportation Water Irrigation Stormwater 0 50 100 150 200 250 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019$’s in Millions 59% Funds slated for 2019-2020 43% Funds slated for Utilities 63% Funding Secured Total CIP Request $204,647 Million 17% Increase over Prior Year CIP Cost Trend Page 40 of 368 CIP Project Amount vs. Project Count 0 50 100 150 200 250 $- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019$’s in thousandsTotal Proposed Cost Number of Projects Page 41 of 368 Funding Sources Current Revenue Rates, Taxes, Expansion Fees Debt Bonds & Loans Grants UnsecuredPage 42 of 368 Net Debt as a Percentage of Debt Limit 1994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620170% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%Page 43 of 368 Unsecured Funds 1 Grants 2 Bonds 3 Loans 4 Partnerships 5 Unknown/Undecided Funds are considered unsecured until the City has received confirmation from funding agency, and Council authorizes such actions.Page 44 of 368 Unsecured Funding -Logistics •Significant infrastructure projects with continuing efforts to close funding gap; e.g ., Lewis Street, Peanuts Park •Utility projects with anticipated but not finalized acquisition of debt; e.g., WWTP Facility Capital Improvement •Projects with grants identified as possible funding sources, but funding decisions not made yet; e.g., Sacajawea Heritage Trail •Projects with yet to be determined funding sources; e.g. Fire Stations 83 and 84 •Inclusion of project in Capital Improvement Plan is a decision making point for some funding organizationsPage 45 of 368 CIP Completed/Changes •20th Avenue Safety Improvement Project •City Wide Traffic Signal –Phase 1 •Columbia Water Intake Project •Oregon Avenue Safety Project –Phase 1 •Safe Routes to School(84/Rowena Chess) •East B Circle Roadway Improvements Page 46 of 368 CIP Completed/Changes -continued •First Ave Center •Chapel Hill Park Design •Facilities Shop Remodel •New Neighborhood Park Rd 48 & Court •Softball Complex •Soccer Facility –East side 40 Acre renamed “A” Street Soccer Complex and figures updatedPage 47 of 368 FACILITIES Page 48 of 368 Facilities Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 FACILITIES 9,151,544 3,375,000 200,000 - - - 12,726,544 - Animal Control Shelter 4,344,000 - - - - - 4,344,000 Downtown Police Substation & Services Facility 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 City Hall Remodel Phase II 1,667,544 - - - - - 1,667,544 Wayfinding & Signage 190,000 225,000 200,000 - - - 615,000 Community Center 900,000 3,150,000 - - - - 4,050,000 Gesa Stadium 2,000,000 - - - - - 2,000,000 Page 49 of 368 Animal Shelter Council goal Joint venture with City of Richland and Kennewick Schedule: Expected to be completed in 2019 Funding Source: City of Pasco share (1/3) from REET Schedule: Expected to be completed in 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $4.3MPage 50 of 368 Community Center Council goal Funding Source: Approximately $1M secured, remaining unsecured - possible UTGO/LTGO bond Schedule: 2019-2020 Total Estimated Cost: $4.0MPage 51 of 368 GESA Stadium Upgrades to 23yr old facility Many needed for Professional Baseball Standards Lodging Tax funds for 20yr internal loan Recommended by Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Construction 2019 Estimated cost: $2.0MPage 52 of 368 FIRE Page 53 of 368 Fire Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 FIRE/AMBULANCE 18,980,000 175,000 - 250,000 - - 19,405,000 Fire Station 83 Replacement 5,919,845 - - - - - 5,919,845 Fire Station 84 Replacement 12,630,155 - - - - - 12,630,155 Fire Station 81 Remodel 180,000 175,000 - 250,000 - - 605,000 Fire Station 85 Land Purchase 250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Page 54 of 368 Fire Station Relocation 83 & 84 Station 84 Meets Emergency Management Plan Includes community space for meeting and outdoor space Square Footage: 18,616+4,591 Total Estimated Cost: $12.4M Station 83 Emergency Management Plan Close proximity to high hazard facilities Square Footage: 10,168 Total Estimated Cost: $5.7M Information above reflects most recent information available as of 09/20/2018 Page 55 of 368 Fire Station 85 Land Purchase Purchase land for future fire station to provide adequate services Growth Management Act requirement Location: Northwest Pasco Total Estimated Cost: $250K Page 56 of 368 PARKS & RECREATION Page 57 of 368 Parks and Recreation Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 PARK & RECREATION 7,465,000 3,605,000 5,500,000 2,560,000 1,435,000 1,320,000 21,885,000 - Peanuts Park Restoration 5,225,000 - - - - - 5,225,000 Schlagel Park Improvements 110,000 610,000 - - - - 720,000 Chapel Hill Park 420,000 - - - - - 420,000 Highland Park Restroom/Concession/Storage Building 200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Dog Park 200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Road 84 Park 400,000 400,000 - - - - 800,000 Road 54 Park Improvement Erwen Property - 20,000 300,000 - - - 320,000 Rd 48 Park Development - - 1,250,000 - - - 1,250,000 Community Park - Northwest - - - 200,000 1,400,000 900,000 2,500,000 A Street Sporting Complex 140,000 900,000 - - - - 1,040,000 Sylvester Park Tennis Court Upgrades - - 80,000 - - - 80,000 Marina Dock Replacement - - 1,300,000 - - - 1,300,000 Pasco Sporting Complex Update Phase II 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Memorial Pool Upgrades 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 Kurtzman Shelter - 60,000 - - - - 60,000 Parks & Facilities Sign Replacement 20,000 15,000 15,000 - - - 50,000 Sacajawea Heritage Trail- Levee Lowering 100,000 - 2,500,000 2,000,000 - - 4,600,000 Sacajawea Heritage Trail - BNSF Tunnel Passage 50,000 1,600,000 - - - - 1,650,000 FCID Trail Phase I - - 55,000 360,000 - - 415,000 FCID Trail Phase II - - - - 35,000 420,000 455,000 Page 58 of 368 “A” Street Sporting Complex Council goal to provide additional soccer fields Funding Source: Anticipated RCO Grant, and Park Development fund Schedule: 2018-2020 Total Estimated Cost: $1.0MPage 59 of 368 Sacajawea Heritage Trail -BNSF Tunnel Passage Connect Sacajawea Heritage Trail to Schlagel Park Funding Source: Capital Improvement Fund (REET), anticipated RCO grant. Partially unsecured Schedule: 2019-2020 Total Estimated Cost: $1.6MPage 60 of 368 Sacajawea Heritage Trail –Levee Lowering Lower levee and widen trail Funding Source: Anticipated RCO Grant, and Capital Improvement Fund (REET) Schedule: 2019-2022 Total Estimated Cost: $4.6MPage 61 of 368 Memorial Pool Upgrades Cover for year-round use Partnership with local clubs, municipalities, and school districts Funding Source: External contributions and Capital Improvement Fund (REET) Schedule: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $500KPage 62 of 368 TRANSPORTATION Page 63 of 368 Transportation Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 TRANSPORTATION 16,682,000 19,638,000 15,881,000 1,550,000 2,270,000 6,130,000 62,151,000 - Chapel Hill Blvd Extension - LID 150 10,241,000 - - - - - 10,241,000 Argent Road (20th Ave to Rd 44)1,634,000 317,000 4,178,000 - - - 6,129,000 Lewis Street Overpass 1,000,000 15,447,000 10,553,000 - - - 27,000,000 James Street Improvements 480,000 1,089,000 - - - - 1,569,000 Road 68 Interchange Improvements 548,000 - - - - - 548,000 Crescent Road (Rd 108 to Chapel Hill Blvd)- 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Sandifur Parkway Widening (Rd 52 to 60)- 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Road 100 Widening - - - - 1,220,000 - 1,220,000 Wrigley Drive Extension 354,000 - - - - - 354,000 Sacajawea Park Road Overlay 385,000 - - - - - 385,000 20th Avenue Court Street to Interstate 182 Overlay 440,000 - - - - - 440,000 Sycamore, Hugo & Waldemar Grind & Overlay - - 195,000 - - - 195,000 Annual Sidewalk & Complete Street Project 100,000 200,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 800,000 Pavement Preservation Program - 555,000 555,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 3,360,000 Sandifur Sidewalk Replacement - 80,000 - - - - 80,000 City Wide Traffic Signal Improvement Phase II 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - - - 3,000,000 Court Street & Road 68 Intersection Improvements - - 150,000 700,000 - - 850,000 Oregon Ave (SR397) Corridor Improvement Phase II - - - - 200,000 2,530,000 2,730,000 Road 76 Overpass - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Pedestrian Walkway on Road 68 Overpass - - - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 Pedestrian Walkway on Sylvester Street Overpass - - - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 Page 64 of 368 Lewis Street Overpass Construction of a new overpass over the BNSF track Funding Source: Connecting WA, Anticipated TIB, Arterial Schedule: Construction 2019-2021 Total Estimated Cost: $27.0MPage 65 of 368 Chapel Hill Boulevard Extension of Chapel Hill Blvd from Road 68 to Road 84 Funding Source: LID, REET Schedule: Construction 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $10.2MPage 66 of 368 Road 68 Corridor Consists of 3 Projects •Wrigley Dr. Extensions (Underway) •Road 68 Interchange Improvements •Road 68 Widening South of I-182 Funding Source: STP, Arterial Fund, Traffic Impact Fund Schedule: Varies 2018-2023 Current Federal Grant Funds Available: $915KPage 67 of 368 Argent Road (20th Ave to Rd 36) Two Phases: Phase I -Saraceno/Varney to 20th Avenue Intersection Phase II -Road 36 to Saraceno/Varney Funding Source: Arterial Fund, partnerships with CBC & the Port of Pasco Schedule: Phase I Construction Complete: Summer 2019 Total Estimated Cost: Phase 1 -$1.8M, Phase II -$4.3MPage 68 of 368 Pavement Preservation Program Preserves and extends life of City streets Crack seal; Overlay; micro-surfacing Pavement rating system will help prioritize projects Total Estimated Cost: $3.4MPage 69 of 368 Annual Sidewalk and Complete Streets Project Address deficiencies of non-motorized pedestrian infrastructure: •Connectivity •Structural integrity •ADA compliance Construction: Ongoing 2019-2024 Total Estimated Cost: $800K Page 70 of 368 20th Avenue Court Street to Interstate 182 Overlay Grind, Overlay, Striping -curb to curb Schedule: Design & Construction: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $440KPage 71 of 368 Sacajawea Park Road -Overlay Main thoroughfare for Port of Pasco businesses Overlay approx. 5,000 linear feet - Railroad to Hwy 12 Parts of street and shoulders have deteriorated Design: 2019; Construction: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $350KPage 72 of 368 UTILITIES Page 73 of 368 WATER Page 74 of 368 Water Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 IRRIGATION 1,000,000 453,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 2,113,000 Annual Irrigation System Improvements - Development 200,000 200,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 500,000 Annual Irrigation Upsize - Development 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 System Improvement & Rehab Projects 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard (Road 84 to Road 68) 220,000 - - - - - 220,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard to Interstate 182 - Irrigation Main 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV)90,000 - - - - - 90,000 Irrigation Main Extension - Wrigley Drive 100,000 113,000 - - - - 213,000 System Evaluation Project 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 WATER 2,286,000 1,446,000 3,480,000 7,057,000 6,226,000 6,005,000 26,500,000 Annual Water System Improvements - Development 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Annual Water Upsize - Development 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard Water Main Upsize 920,000 - - - - - 920,000 Aquifer Storage & Recovery (ASR) System - - 350,000 1,500,000 - - 1,850,000 West Pasco (WTP) Plant Improvements 800,000 856,000 1,100,000 720,000 - - 3,476,000 Butterfield (WTP) - Chlorine Safety 75,000 250,000 - - - - 325,000 Automated Meter Reading - - 750,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 3,750,000 Reservoir Storage Tank(s)- - 150,000 2,850,000 4,200,000 4,500,000 11,700,000 Water Main Extension - Alton Street (Wehe Ave to the alley west of Owen St) - - - 327,000 - - 327,000 Water Main Extension - Riverhaven Street (Rd 36 to Rd 40) - - - - - 305,000 305,000 Water Main Replacement - Star Lane (Rd 100 to Rd 97) 218,000 - - - - - 218,000 Water Main Replacement - South 18th Ave (Court St to WA Ave)73,000 - - - - - 73,000 Water Main Replacement - Alley East of Wehe Ave - 140,000 - - - - 140,000 Water Main Replacement - Road 60 (Court St to W Pearl)- - 930,000 - - - 930,000 Water Main Replacement - Richardson Road (Rd 92 to Rd 96)- - - 460,000 - - 460,000 Water Main Replacement - Road 76 (Wernett Rd to Court St) - - - - 826,000 - 826,000 Page 75 of 368 West Pasco WTP Improvements Added filtration and piping to increase treatment capacity Increases potable water supply from 6MGD to 12MGD Design: 2019; Construction: 2020 -2022 Total Estimated Cost: $3.5MPage 76 of 368 Reservoir Storage Tank Evaluate storage needs in NW area and E side. Identify a single storage site to support needs of both areas. Design: 2021-2022; Construction: 2023 -2024 Total Estimated Cost: $11.7M Page 77 of 368 Waterline Replacement –Star Lane Replace ~ 450’ of 2” PVC water main with 8” ductile iron. Adds 550 feet to loop Road 100 to Road 97 Supports enhanced fire suppression capabilities within the area with with the installation of two fire hydrants Design: 2019; Construction: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $218KPage 78 of 368 SEWER Page 79 of 368 Sewer Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 IRRIGATION 1,000,000 453,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 2,113,000 Annual Irrigation System Improvements - Development 200,000 200,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 500,000 Annual Irrigation Upsize - Development 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 System Improvement & Rehab Projects 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard (Road 84 to Road 68) 220,000 - - - - - 220,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard to Interstate 182 - Irrigation Main 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV)90,000 - - - - - 90,000 Irrigation Main Extension - Wrigley Drive 100,000 113,000 - - - - 213,000 System Evaluation Project 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 SEWER 10,173,000 5,850,000 5,424,000 5,420,000 6,110,000 5,200,000 38,177,000 - Annual Sewer System Improvements - Development 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Annual Sewer Upsize - Development 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 WWTP Facility Capital Improvement Projects - - 3,536,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 18,536,000 Wastewater Treatment Plant (PLC)s and Controls Upgrade 855,000 - - - - - 855,000 River Outfall Phase I 1,464,000 5,000,000 - - - - 6,464,000 Harris Road Sewer Transmission Main 2,500,000 - - - - - 2,500,000 9th & Washington Lift Station 731,000 - - - - - 731,000 Pearl Street Lift Station 510,000 380,000 - - - - 890,000 Road 36 Lift Station Upgrades 281,000 - - - - - 281,000 Maitland Lift Station - Purchase/ Install 4th Pump 132,000 - - - - - 132,000 Broadmoor Area Lift Station 3,500,000 - - - - - 3,500,000 Road 52 & Pearl Street Lift Station - 270,000 1,100,000 - - - 1,370,000 Road 84 & Roberts Drive Lift Station - - - 220,000 910,000 - 1,130,000 Road 44 Corrosion & Odor Control - - 588,000 - - - 588,000 Page 80 of 368 Harris Road Sewer 5,290 linear feet new sanitary sewer transmission main From W Court Street, under Interstate 182, to Harris Road Funding Source: Sewer fund Schedule: Construction 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $2.5MPage 81 of 368 Pearl Street Lift Station (Rebuild) Rebuild existing 1950s sewer lift station Existing access hatch in sidewalk Pump station located beneath Pearl St. Design: 2017-2018; Construction: 2019-2020 Total Estimated Cost: $890K, revenue bondPage 82 of 368 WWTP PLC Upgrade Upgrade 1989 Era Programmable Logic & Controllers (PLC) Replace with modern technology Design: 2019; Construction: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $855K, revenue bondPage 83 of 368 River Outfall Phase 1 Upsize sanitary sewer outfall pipe to the Columbia River Helps increase capacity at the WWTP Design: 2019; Construction: 2019-2020 Total Estimated Cost: $6.5M, revenue bondPage 84 of 368 STORMWATER Page 85 of 368 Stormwater Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 STORMWATER 200,000 200,000 310,000 779,000 200,000 200,000 1,889,000 - Annual Stormwater Improvements - Development 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capital Stormwater Participation Program 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 North Industrial Way Infiltration Retrofit Project - - 110,000 - - - 110,000 1st Avenue Pipe Rehab - - - 249,000 - - 249,000 Sylvester Pipe Relining - - - 330,000 - - 330,000 Page 86 of 368 N. Industrial Way Infiltration Retrofit Project Increase capacity to prevent flooding on N. Industrial Way Provides service for 37 acres of development Designed Design: 2021; Construction: 2021 Total Estimated Cost: $110KPage 87 of 368 IRRIGATION Page 88 of 368 Irrigation Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 IRRIGATION 850,000 453,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 1,963,000 Annual Irrigation System Improvements - Development 200,000 200,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 500,000 Annual Irrigation Upsize - Development 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 System Improvement & Rehab Projects 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard (Road 84 to Road 68) 220,000 - - - - - 220,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard to Interstate 182 - Irrigation Main 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Chapel Hill Boulevard Pressure Reducing Valve (PRV)90,000 - - - - - 90,000 Irrigation Main Extension - Wrigley Drive 100,000 113,000 - - - - 213,000 Page 89 of 368 Chapel Hill Boulevard (Rd 84 –Rd 68) 6,750 lineal feet of 12” irrigation main From Rd. 84 in the Chapel Hill area to Rd. 68 City partnership with development. Construction: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $220KPage 90 of 368 Process Water Resource Facility Page 91 of 368 PWRF Project Summary Project Name Plan Year 2019 Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Plan Year 2022 Plan Year 2023 Plan Year 2024 Total Request 2019-2024 PROCESS WATER REUSE FACILITY 17,111,000 2,839,000 - - - - 19,950,000 - Columbia East Force Main & Lift Station 6,943,000 927,000 - - - - 7,870,000 PWRF Solids Handling Improvements 300,000 - - - - - 300,000 PWRF Irrigation Pump Station (IPS) Improvements 4,271,000 - - - - - 4,271,000 Foster Wells Automatic Transfer Switch Replacement 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 PWRF Primary Treatment Improvement 5,447,000 1,912,000 - - - - 7,359,000 Note: Plan shown addresses only near-term treatment needs. Longer term needs are not identified plan as options vary widely at this point. Additionally, alternatives for additional major users under evaluation which would drive the need for considerable additional private investment to improve the plant.Page 92 of 368 Columbia East Lift Station and Forcemain Industrial Wastewater Lift Station and Dual Force Mains Directs food processor wastewater to the Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF) Allows Removal of 1.2MGD from Municipal Wastewater Plant Funding Sources: WA State Dept. of Commerce Grant Franklin County .09 Grant Federal EDA Grant Industrial Food Processors Construction Complete: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $7.9MPage 93 of 368 PWRF Solids Handling Improvements Facility/System for Solids Management WA Dept. of Ecology permit requirement Design: 2018-2019; Construction: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $300K Page 94 of 368 PWRF Industrial Pump Station (IPS) Improvements Replaces Irrigation Pump Station Current Pump Station at Full Capacity and at End of Life Costly Maintenance and Repair constantly needed Design: 2018; Construction: 2019 Total Estimated Cost: $4.3MPage 95 of 368 PWRF Pretreatment Improvements Provides improved Grit and Solids removal Updated technology and methods to meet Ecology requirements Improves Effluent Quality Increases Overall Capacity Design: 2019-2020; Construction: 2019-2020 Total Estimated Cost: $7.MPage 96 of 368 Page 97 of 368 RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION approving the Capital Improvement Plan for Calendar Years 2019-2024. WHEREAS, staff has prepared the Capital Improvement Plan which defines the capital projects proposed to be undertaken by the City over the ensuing six years; and WHEREAS, on September 24, 2018, the Capital Improvement Plan was presented to the City Council for review and prioritization; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON: That the Pasco City Council hereby approves the Capital Improvement Plan for calendar years 2019-2024 as the City’s list of capital projects proposed to be undertaken by the City over the coming six years, with the understanding that implementation of any project listed in the Capital Improvement Plan is subject to budget appropriation. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1st day of October, 2018. _____________________________ Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Daniela Erickson Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney Page 98 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 25, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Director Finance SUBJECT: Ordinance modifying PMC 5.04.010 Business License Definitions and PMC 5.04.170 Business License Exemptions I. REFERENCE(S): Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. ___________, amending PMC Section 5.04.010 "Definitions"; amending PMC Section 5.04.170 "Exemptions"; and, further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Expected to be minimal. Data on businesses making less than $2,000/year not available. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In 2017 the State Legislature adopted EHB 2005, codified in chapter 35.90 RCW, to address their concerns and simplify the administration of municipal general business licenses. These changes require cities to take specific actions by certain dates within a limited timeline. Chapter 35.90 RCW requires all cities and towns with general business licensing requirements to adopt a uniform "model ordinance" identifying what types of commercial activity are and are not subject to business licensing requirements. The provisions of the model ordinance only address general business licensing; they do not address temporary licenses (such as seasonal businesses or special event permits), regulatory licenses, or local business and occupation (B&O) taxes. However, it should be noted that this is not a comprehensive model ordinance – rather, it consists of just two provisions that must be incorporated into the rest of the city’s Page 99 of 368 business licensing regulations. The required provisions of the model ordinance were drafted by a committee through the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) and released in June 2018. The committee was comprised of representatives from cities that impose general business license requirements, with input from state and local business associations and chambers of commerce. The model ordinance has two required components: • Cities and towns may only impose licensing requirements upon individuals or companies "engaging in business within the city," as defined in the model ordinance. The ordinance also sets forth examples of activities that are considered "engaging in business," as well as business activities that do not require licensing. The definition is based on the model ordinance for B&O taxes. • For businesses that engage in business within the city but are not physically located within the city, the ordinance establishes a minimum dollar threshold below which the businesses must be partially or fully exempted from licensing requirements. The minimum threshold of business activity in the ordinance is $2,000, although cities may adopt a higher threshold if desired. Below this threshold, cities must either: exempt these businesses from the licensing requirements entirely, or require licensing, but at no cost to the businesses. EHB 2005 requires cities to take specific action by certain dates within a limited timeline. The deadline for current BLS partner cities to adopt the new model business license provisions is October 17, 2018. In addition they must provide notification to BLS a minimum of 75 days prior to effective date for "all changes that affect in any way who must obtain a license, who is exempt from obtaining a license, or the amount or method of determining any fee for the issuance or renewal of the license." Both provisions of the model ordinance will require the 75 day notification to BLS. V. DISCUSSION: On August 13, 2017 a presentation was given by Richa Sigdel, City of Pasco Finance Director, and discussion commenced with the Pasco City Council regarding the changes related to EHB-2005. Staff recommended a minimum threshold of $2,000/year for all businesses; exemption of business licensing requirements for all businesses below the minimum threshold; and agreed to the definitions of "Engaging in Business". Staff agreed it would have minimal impact to the City and stated they would have the City Attorney review PMC and the new required language for consistency. After further review and by Staff and the City Attorney, Staff recommend moving forward with the changes as written in the new Ordinance to comply with EHB 2005 and also to maintain consistency related to City licensing of businesses that are residents of the City and businesses that are non -residents but do business within the Page 100 of 368 City. Page 101 of 368 Ordinance Amending PMC 5.04.010 and PMC 5.04.170 - 1 ORDINANCE NO.__________ AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington Amending Pasco Municipal Code Section 5.04.010 “Definitions” and Section 5.04.170 “Exemptions” WHEREAS, the City of Pasco’s business license requirements, including fees, are adopted in Chapter 5.04 PMC; and WHEREAS, RCW 35.90 RCW requires the City to update its business license code by January 1, 2019, to include a new definition of what constitutes “engaging in business” in the City and licensing fee exemptions for certain businesses that do not maintain a place of business within the City; and WHEREAS, Chapter 5.04 PMC includes classification of certain types of business license and exemption that are no longer relevant or desired. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 5.04.010 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled “Definitions” shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 5.04.010 DEFINITIONS. A) “Business” means, unless otherwise exempted herein, all activities, occupations, services, trades, pursuits or professions conducted located and/or engaged in within the City with the object of gain, benefit, profit, or advantage, to the person or entity engaging in the same, or to any person or class, directly or indirectly, for which a State of Washington business license is required.. For the purpose of this Chapter, a business shall not include any qualifying religious, political, charitable or nonprofit activity, however, the same shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 5.07 of this title. Each business location within the City of Pasco shall be deemed a separate business for the purpose of requiring a business license except those additional business locations within the City which provide ancillary services to the primary business activity, but do not provide direct sale of services or products including, but not limited to, facilities utilized only for storage, product preparation, maintenance or training. B) “Business Licensing Service” or “BLS” means the office within the Washington State Department of Revenue that administers the application and renewal of the City’s General Business Licenses. C) “City” means City of Pasco, Washington. D) “Employee” means any person who performs work, labor, or services for a business and is on the business payroll. The term “employee” also includes self-employed persons, sole Page 102 of 368 Ordinance Amending PMC 5.04.010 and PMC 5.04.170 - 2 proprietors, owners, managers, partners, and all full-time, part-time, and temporary employees on the business payroll. E) Engaging in Business. 1) The term “engaging in business" means commencing, conducting, or continuing in business, and also the exercise of corporate or franchise powers, as well as liquidating a business when the liquidators thereof hold themselves out to the public as conducting such business. 2) This section sets forth examples of activities that constitute engaging in business in the City, and establishes safe harbors for certain of those activities so that a person who meets the criteria may engage in de minimis business activities in the City without having to pay a business license fee. The activities listed in this section are illustrative only and are not intended to narrow the definition of "engaging in business" in subsection (1). If an activity is not listed, whether it constitutes engaging in business in the City shall be determined by considering all the facts and circumstances and applicable law. 3) Without being all inclusive, any one of the following activities conducted within the City by a person, or its employee, agent, representative, independent contractor, broker or another acting on its behalf constitutes engaging in business and requires a person to register and obtain a business license: (a) Owning, renting, leasing, maintaining, or having the right to use, or using, tangible personal property, intangible personal property, or real property permanently or temporarily located in the City. (b) Owning, renting, leasing, using, or maintaining an office, place of business, or other establishment in the City. (c) Soliciting sales. (d) Making repairs or providing maintenance or service to real or tangible personal property, including warranty work and property maintenance. (e) Providing technical assistance or service, including quality control, product inspections, warranty work, or similar services on or in connection with tangible personal property sold by the person or on its behalf. (f) Installing, constructing, or supervising installation or construction of, real or tangible personal property. Page 103 of 368 Ordinance Amending PMC 5.04.010 and PMC 5.04.170 - 3 (g) Soliciting, negotiating, or approving franchise, license, or other similar agreements. (h) Collecting current or delinquent accounts. (i) Picking up and transporting tangible personal property, solid waste, construction debris, or excavated materials. (j) Providing disinfecting and pest control services, employment and labor pool services, home nursing care, janitorial services, appraising, landscape architectural services, security system services, surveying, and real estate services including the listing of homes and managing real property. (k) Rendering professional services such as those provided by accountants, architects, attorneys, auctioneers, consultants, engineers, professional athletes, barbers, baseball clubs and other sports organizations, chemists, consultants, psychologists, court reporters, dentists, doctors, detectives, laboratory operators, teachers, veterinarians. (l) Meeting with customers or potential customers, even when no sales or orders are solicited at the meetings. (m) Training or recruiting agents, representatives, independent contractors, brokers or others, domiciled or operating on a job in the City, acting on its behalf, or for customers or potential customers. (n) Investigating, resolving, or otherwise assisting in resolving customer complaints. (o) In-store stocking or manipulating products or goods, sold to and owned by a customer, regardless of where sale and delivery of the goods took place. (p) Delivering goods in vehicles owned, rented, leased, used, or maintained by the person or another acting on its behalf. 4) If a person, or its employee, agent, representative, independent contractor, broker or another acting on the person’s behalf, engages in no other activities in or with the City but the following, it need not register and obtain a business license. (a) Meeting with suppliers of goods and services as a customer. (b) Meeting with government representatives in their official capacity, other than those performing contracting or purchasing functions. Page 104 of 368 Ordinance Amending PMC 5.04.010 and PMC 5.04.170 - 4 (c) Attending meetings, such as board meetings, retreats, seminars, and conferences, or other meetings wherein the person does not provide training in connection with tangible personal property sold by the person or on its behalf. This provision does not apply to any board of director member or attendee engaging in business such as a member of a board of directors who attends a board meeting. (d) Renting tangible or intangible property as a customer when the property is not used in the City. (e) Attending, but not participating in a "trade show" or "multiple vendor events". Persons participating at a trade show shall review the City's trade show or multiple vendor event ordinances. (f) Conducting advertising through the mail. (g) Soliciting sales by phone from a location outside the City. 5) A seller located outside the City merely delivering goods into the City by means of common carrier is not required to register and obtain a business license, provided that it engages in no other business activities in the City. Such activities do not include those in subsection (4). The City expressly intends that engaging in business include any activity sufficient to establish nexus for purposes of applying the license fee under the law and the constitutions of the United States and the State of Washington. Nexus is presumed to continue as long as the taxpayer benefits from the activity that constituted the original nexus generating contact or subsequent contacts. FE) “Licensee” shall include the applicant(s) for a business license or the holder thereof for any use of period of time. GF) “Outside area” means unenclosed areas used for selling, display, or storage. HG) “Person” means any individual, partnership, joint venture, company, firm, corporation, association, receiver, assignee, trustee, trust, estate, club, or any group of individuals acting as a unit. Those engaged in the practice of a profession will be treated as any other person. (Ord. 4372, 2017; Ord. 3647 Sec. 1, 2003; Ord. 3569 Sec. 1, 2002; Ord. 2675 Sec. 1, 1988; prior code Sec. 3-1.04.) Section 2. That Section 5.04.170 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled “Exemptions” shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: Page 105 of 368 Ordinance Amending PMC 5.04.010 and PMC 5.04.170 - 5 5.04.170 EXEMPTIONS. To the extent set forth in this Chapter, the following persons and businesses shall be exempt from the registration, license and/or license fee requirements as outlined in this Chapter: A) Monetary Threshold. Any person or business whose annual value of products, gross proceeds of sales, or gross income of the business in the City is equal to or less than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) and who does not maintain a place of business within the City shall be exempt from the general business license requirements in this Chapter. The exemption does not apply to regulatory license requirements or activities that require a specialized permit. BA) Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit organizations operating without private profit, either regularly or temporarily, for a public, charitable, educational, literary, fraternal or religious purpose shall apply for a no fee business license at the City and conduct activities only after the no fee business license has been issued. This no fee provision shall apply only to the nonprofit organization but not persons sponsored by nonprofit organizations if any private profit whatsoever is derived from its operation. Any business conducted where only a part of the proceeds go to a nonprofit organization is not exempt from a business license fee. (Ord. 4380, 2018; Ord. 4372, 2017; Ord. 3394 Sec. 1, 1999; Ord. 2619, Sec. 1, 1986; Ord. 1907 Sec. 4, 1977; prior code Sec. 3- 1.170 – 3.1.206.) Section 3. All remaining terms and conditions of Chapter 5.04 “Licenses Generally” not amended herein, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect on January 1, 2019. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this ______ day of _______________, 2018. ____________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ ____________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 106 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 26, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager Executive SUBJECT: Sale of City Property on Dradie Street I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Resolution Resolution No. 3849 Purchase and Sale Agreement Location II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. _____, approving the sale of certain real property on Dradie Street. III. FISCAL IMPACT: $119,755 Net Water Fund IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City owns a 1.4 acre property on Dradie Street formerly used as a well site for the water utility. The property is zoned RS-20 and is no longer needed for the utility. The City held a public hearing in June regarding the disposition of the property; Council subsequently approved Resolution No. 3849 (attached) authorizing the City Manager to move forward with preparation to sell the parcel as one building lot. With the services of the City's Real Estate Broker, Rob Ellsworth, the property was valued at $124,000 ($24,000 in excess of the City's 2017 appraisal). Five offers were ultimately received with the offer from the Carrillo family in the amount of $130,000 (cash) being most advantageous to the City. V. DISCUSSION: Page 107 of 368 Staff recommends approval of the proposed Resolution authorizing the City Manager to complete the sale as outlined. Page 108 of 368 RESOLUTION NO. __ A RESOLUTION of the City of Pasco, Washington, approving the sale of certain real property on Dradie Street. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3849, the Pasco City Council authorized the sale of a 1.4- acre residential property on Dradie Street, subject to final approval of the City Council and in accordance with the provisions of said Resolution and applicable policy and law; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed a purchase offer on the property which has been recommended for approval by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the proposed purchase price of $130,000 by Helidoro Carrillo and Nancy Elizondo-Carrillo above the City’s asking price of $124,000 and has been determined to be most advantageous to the City, and is fully accepted. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to complete the sale transaction as outlined in the attached Purchase and Sale Agreement as Exhibit “A”. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular meeting this ______ day of October, 2018. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 109 of 368 RESOLUTION NO.Lieffei A RESOLUTION of the City of Pasco, Washington, approving the sale of certain real property on Dradie Street. WHEREAS, the City owns approximately 1.4 acres of real property on Dradie Street; and WHEREAS, the property was originally acquired in connection with the City's culinary water utility; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing before the City Council on June 4, 2018, pursuant to RCW 35.94.040, the Council has determined that the property is not necessary for anticipated future use of the City and its disposal will best serve the public's interest; and WHEREAS, the City has determined to offer the property for sale as one residential building lot; and WHEREAS,the City has determined to list the property with a real estate professional in order to provide widespread notice of the availability of the property and to assist the City in other matters related thereto; and WHEREAS, the proposed use of the property is consistent with zoning in the vicinity. NOW,THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That preparation for the sale of that certain real property consisting of 1.4 acres on Dradie Street, as one residential building lot, is hereby authorized. Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to undertake all actions deemed advisable, including the retention of a real estate professional, to prepare, appraise, market and complete all documents necessary to affect the sale of the property, subject to final approval of the City Council and in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution and applicable policy and law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular meeting this 270 day of July, 2018. Zf T-9--- Matt Watkins, Mayor TT ST: xj0,6(fil,)Daniela Erickson, y Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 110 of 368 Docusign Envelope ID:7865BAO9-A499-4045-B668-FD858B975D5B Form 25 Vacant Land Purchase 8.Sale Rev.2/17 Page 1 of 5 .“.‘°.°°.“.°"S" 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Date:segtembar 7!2018 Buyer: Buyer Seller: Seller VACANT LAND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT SP MLS No.:232373 Halidoro Carrillo,Nancy Elizondo-Carrillo ©Copyrighl 2017 Northwest Multiple Listing Service ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ECIFIC TERMS Buyer siaius City Seller of Pasco Property:Legal Description attached as Exhibit A.Tax Parcel No(s).:11ti.512.119 ,, nka Dradia Street,Pasco,Washington 99301 Offer Expiration Date:September 21 ,2018 Address city late Zip Purchase Price:$124 ,124 .00 Dollars Earnest Money:$1 ,000.00 [3]Check;Q Note;Q Other (held by Q Selling Firm;Closing Agent) Default:(check only one)?n Forfeiture of Earnest Money;Q Se||er’s Election of Remedies Title Insurance Company:Benton Franklin Title Closing Agent:Jennifer Lopez Company .Closing Date:October 5,2018 ;Poss Individual(opilonai) ession Date:3]on Closing;Q Other Services of Closing Agent for Payment of Utilities:ml Requested (attach NWMLS Form 22K);Q Waived chargeemssessments Levied Before but Due o 0SellerCitizenship(FIRPTA):seiier?ls?ns Subdivision:The Property Q must be subdivided before Feasibility Contingency Expiration Date:m 7 Closing:Q assumed by Buyer;x prepaid in full by Seller at Closing reign person for purposes of US.income taxation days after mutual acceptance;Q Other Agency Disclosure:Selling Broker represents:mBuyer;Q Seller,Q both parties;Q neither party Listing Broker represents:Seller;Q both parties Addendazlsecailation,Financing,Utilities ;Q is not required to be subdivided Docuil?mdby: thlioplm(xwvillo 9/9/2018 8:22:33 PM PDT I ‘endow Carrillo Dal:Szilers Signature City of Pasco Date 9/9/2018 8.27.35 PM PDT u ei:s°§'zlisondo-Carrillo Date Seller‘:Signature Date 1108 N.Road 36 523 “'3'”‘Ve- Buyers Address Sellers Address Palco ,WA 99301 FE5C°-WA 99301 City,State.Zip City,State,Zip (509)545-7906 509-543-5750 Phone No.Fax No.Phone No.Fax No a .aliodoroeyehoo .coin 51REBELS@nasco-we-gov Buyers E-mail Address Sellers E-rriailAddress SVN I Rotter 5 Coinpx SVN Rotter E Cganx Selling Firrn MLS Oi?ce N0.Listing Firm MLS Ollice Nn Rob Ellsworth Rob Ellsworth Selling Broker (Print)MLS LAG N04 Listing Broker (Print)MLS LAG No (509)430-2378 (509)I30-2378 Firm Phone No Broker Phone No.Firm Fax No.Firm Phone No Broker Phone No Firm Fax No robin Juughgg evn .eon Selling Firm Document E-mail Address Robeaoblllleworth .can Selling Brokefs E-mail Address robin .?I1IlDh1@ svn .com Listing Firm Document E-mail Address Robe?obzllsworth .com Listing Brokers E»rnai|Address Selling Broker DOL LlOeflSeNo Selling Firm DOL License No.Listing Broker DOL License No. Windcmicrckcal Eslatcfl'ri-Cities,329 Nonh Kellogg KcnncwickWA 99336 Rob EllswonhPhone:(509)430-2378 Fax. Produced with zlpFnmv®by zipLegix 18070 F?leen Mile Road,Fraser.Michigan 4en26 w my ngix cgm Listing Firm DOL License No l1i':n|ii- Page 111 of 368 Dncuslgn Envelope ID:7B65BA09-A599-4048-866&FD838B975D5B Form 25 ©Copyrighl 2017 V ntLandPrh &Sale Nrth tMlt'|Li"S ' R:§f"2,1,“°3“VACANT LAND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ‘’A{f=:,,G:,;g:.E';'E';§,,E°,,~'°e Page 2 of 5 GENERAL TERMS Continued a.Purchase Price.Buyer shall pay to Seller the Purchase Price,including the Earnest Money,in cash at Closing,unless otherwise speci?ed in this Agreement.Buyer represents that Buyer has suf?cient funds to close this sale in accordance with this Agreement and is not relying on any contingent source of funds,including funds from loans,the sale of other property.gifts.retirement,or future earnings,except to the extent otherwise speci?ed in this Agreement. b.Earnest Money.Buyer shall deliver the Earnest Money within 2 days after mutual acceptance to Selling Broker or to Closing Agent.If Buyer delivers the Earnest Money to Selling Broker,Selling Broker will deposit any check to be held by Selling Firm,or deliver any Earnest Money to be held by Closing Agent,within 3 days of receipt or mutual acceptance. whichever occurs later if the Earnest Money is held by Selling Firm and is over $10,000.00 it shall be deposited into an interest bearing trust account in Selling Firm's name provided that Buyer completes an lRS Form W-9.Interest,if any. after deduction of bank charges and fees,will be paid to Buyer.Buyer shall reimburse Selling Firm for bank charges and fees in excess of the interest earned.if any.if the Earnest Money held by Selling Firm is over $10,000.00 Buyer has the option to require Selling Firm to deposit the Earnest Money into the Housing Trust Fund Account,with the interest paid to the State Treasurer,if both Seller and Buyer so agree in writing.If the Buyer does not complete an IRS Form W-9 before Selling Firm must deposit the Earnest Money or the Earnest Money is $10,000.00 or less.the Earnest Money shall be deposited into the Housing Trust Fund Account.Selling Firm may transfer the Earnest Money to Closing Agent at Closing.If all or part of the Earnest Money is to be refunded to Buyer and any such costs remain unpaid,the Selling Firm or Closing Agent may deduct and pay them therefrom.The parties instruct Closing Agent to provide written verification of receipt of the Earnest Money and notice of dishonor of any check to the parties and Brokers at the addresses and/or fax numbers provided herein. Upon termination of this Agreement.a party or the Closing Agent may deliver a form authorizing the release of Earnest Money to the other party or the parties.The party(s)shall execute such form and deliver the same to the Closing Agent. If either party fails to execute the release form,a party may make a written demand to the Closing Agent for the Earnest Money Pursuant to RCW 64.04,Closing Agent shall deliver notice of the demand to the other party within 15 days.If the other party does not object to the demand within 20 days of Closing Agent's notice,Closing Agent shall disburse the Earnest Money to the party making the demand within 10 days of the expiration of the 20 day period.If Closing Agent timely receives an objection or an inconsistent demand from the other party.Closing Agent shall commence an interpleader action within 60 days of such objection or inconsistent demand,unless the parties provide subsequent consistent instructions to Closing Agent to disburse the earnest money or refrain from commencing an interpleader action for a specified period of time.Pursuant to RCW 4.28.080,the parties consent to service of the summons and complaint for an interpleader action by ?rst class mail.postage prepaid at the party's usual mailing address or the address identi?ed in this Agreement.If the Closing Agent complies with the preceding process,each party shall be deemed to have released Closing Agent from any and all claims or liability related to the disbursal of the Earnest Money.If either party fails to authorize the release of the Earnest Money to the other party when required to do so under this Agreement,that party shall be in breach of this Agreement.For the purposes of this section,the term Closing guwwwmrummnmmrolvw —n—\—a—\—-—-—-—-—-Awl\>—>Ot0m\lOaU1bwl\>—xo £Dm\imcIiAmro-aotoonxlotui Amw-x Agent includes a Selling Firm holding the Earnest Money.The parties authorize the party commencing an interpleader 35 action to deduct up to $500.00 for the costs thereof 36 c.Condition of Title.Unless otherwise speci?ed in this Agreement.title to the Property shall be marketable at Closing.37 The following shall not cause the title to be unmarketable:rights.reservations.covenants,conditions and restrictions.38 presently of record and general to the area;easements and encroachments,not materially affecting the value of or 39 unduly interfering with Buyer's reasonable use of the Property;and reserved oil and/or mining rights.Monetary 40 encumbrances or liens not assumed by Buyer.shall be paid or discharged by Seller on or before Closing.Title shall be 41 conveyed by a Statutory Warranty Deed.If this Agreement is for conveyance of a buyers interest in a Real Estate 42 Contract.the Statutory Warranty Deed shall include a buyer's assignment of the contract sufficient to convey after 43 acquired title.If the Property has been short platted.the Short Plat number is in the Legal Description.44 d.Title insurance.Seller authorizes Buyer's lender or Closing Agent.at Seller's expense,to apply for the then-current 45 ALTA form of standard fonn owner's policy of title insurance from the Title Insurance Company.If Seller previously 46 received a preliminary commitment from a Title insurance Company that Buyer declines to use,Buyer shall pay any 47 cancellation fees owing to the original Title Insurance Company.Othenivise.the party applying for title insurance shall 48 pay any title cancellation fee,in the event such a fee is assessed.The Title Insurance Company shall send a copy of 49 the preliminary commitment to Seller,Listing Broker.Buyer and Selling Broker.The preliminary commitment,and the 50 title policy to be issued.shall contain no exceptions other than the General Exclusions and Exceptions in said standard 51 form and Special Exceptions consistent with the Condition of Title herein provided.If title cannot be made so insurable 52 prior to the Closing Date.then as Buyer's sole and exclusive remedy.the Earnest Money shall,unless Buyer elects to 53 waive such defects or encumbrances.be refunded to the Buyer,less any unpaid costs described in the Agreement.and 54 this Agreement shall thereupon be terminated.Buyer shall have no right to speci?c performance or damages as a 55 consequence of Seller's inability to provide insurable title.56 e.Closing and Possession.This sale shall be closed by the Closing Agent on the Closing Date.'Closing"means the 57 date on which all documents are recorded and the sale proceeds are available to Seller.If the Closing Date falls on a 58 Saturday,Sunday,legal holiday as de?ned in RCW 1.16.050.or day when the county recording of?ce is closed,the 59 Closing Agent shall close the transaction on the next day that is not a Saturday.Sunday,legal holiday.or day when the 60 9/9/2°13 3‘22‘3?,;"““"9/9/2013s:27:35 PM PDT Buyer's Initials Date Buyers Initials Date Seller's Initials Date setters iniiiais Date Produced with zipForm®by zipmgix ieuro Filleen Mile Road.Fraser.Michigan 45026 Eg?jlg mix gm Dradio Page 112 of 368 DocuSign Envelope ID:7B65BA09-A499-4048-8668-FD838B975D5B Form 25 ©Copyught 2017 },’:§?;‘1L;‘““"””‘“a‘e 3‘33”VACANT LAND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT N“$3353,g,:'$g';;'§‘;Ej§g'°e Page 3 of 5 GENERAL TERMS Continued county recording office is closed.Buyer shall be entitled to possession at 9:00 pm.on the Possession Date Seller shall maintain the Property in its present condition,normal wear and tear excepted,until the Buyer is entitled to possession Buyer reserves the right to walk through the Property within 5 days of Closing to verify that Seller has maintained the Property as required by this paragraph.Seller shall not enter into or modify existing leases or rental agreements, service contracts,or other agreements affecting the Property which have terms extending beyond Closing without first obtaining Buyers consent,which shall not be unreasonably withheld Section 1031 Like-Kind Exchange.if either Buyer or Seller intends for this transaction to be a part of a Section 1031 like-kind exchange,then the other party shall cooperate in the completion of the like-kind exchange so long as the cooperating party incurs no additional liability in doing so,and so long as any expenses (including attorneys’fees and costs)incurred by the cooperating party that are related only to the exchange are paid or reimbursed to the cooperating party at or prior to Closing.Notwithstanding the Assignment paragraph of this Agreement,any party completing a Section 1031 like-kind exchange may assign this Agreement to its quali?ed intermediary or any entity set up for the purposes of completing a reverse exchange. Closing Costs and Prorations and Charges and Assessments.Seller and Buyer shall each pay onevhalf of the escrow fee unless otherwise required by applicable FHA or VA regulations.Taxes for the current year,rent,interest, and lienable homeowners association dues shall be prorated as of Closing.Buyer shall pay Buyer's loan costs, including credit report,appraisal charge and lender's title insurance,unless provided otherwise in this Agreement.If any payments are delinquent on encumbrances which will remain after Closing,Closing Agent is instructed to pay such delinquencies at Closing from money due,or to be paid by,Seller.Buyer shall pay for remaining fuel in the fuel tank it, prior to Closing,Seller obtains a written statement from the supplier as to the quantity and current price and provides such statement to the Closing Agent.Seller shall pay all utility charges,including unbilled charges.Unless waived in Speci?c Term No.11,Seller and Buyer request the services of Closing Agent in disbursing funds necessary to satisfy unpaid utility charges in accordance with RCW 60.80 and Seller shall provide the names and addresses of all utilities providing service to the Property and having lien rights (attach NWMLS Form 22K Identi?cation of Utilities or equivalent). Buyer is advised to verify the existence and amount of any local improvement district,capacity or impact charges or other assessments that may be charged against the Property before or after Closing.Seller will pay such charges that are or become due on or before Closing.Charges levied before Closing,but becoming due after Closing shall be paid as agreed in Speci?c Tenn No.12. Sale lnfonnation.Listing Broker and Selling Broker are authorized to report this Agreement (including price and all terms)to the Multiple Listing Service that published it and to its members,?nancing institutions,appraisers,and anyone else related to this sale.Buyer and Seller expressly authorize all Closing Agents,appraisers,title insurance companies, and others related to this Sale,to furnish the Listing Broker and/or Selling Broker,on request,any and all information and copies of documents concerning this sale. Seller Citizenship and FIRPTA.Seller warrants that the identification of sellers citizenship status for purposes of U.S. income taxation in Speci?c Term No.13 is correct Seller shall execute a certi?cation (NWMLS Form 22E or equivalent) under the Foreign investment In Real Property Tax Act (“FlRPTA")at Closing and provide the certification to the Closing Agent.if Seller is a foreign person for purposes of U S.income taxation,and this transaction is not otherwise exempt from FIRPTA,Closing Agent is instructed to withhold and pay the required amount to the Internal Revenue Service Notices and Delivery of Documents.Any notice related to this Agreement (including revocations of offers or counteroffers)must be in writing.Notices to Seller must be signed by at least one Buyer and shall be deemed delivered only when the notice is received by Seller,by Listing Broker,or at the licensed office of Listing Broker.Notices to Buyer must be signed by at least one Seller and shall be deemed delivered only when the notice is received by Buyer,by Selling Broker,or at the licensed of?ce of Selling Broker.Documents related to this Agreement,such as NWMLS Form 17C,Information on Lead-Based Paint and Lead~Based Paint Hazards,Public Offering Statement or Resale Certi?cate, and all other documents shall be delivered pursuant to this paragraph.Buyer and Seller must keep Selling Broker and Listing Broker advised of their whereabouts in order to receive prompt noti?cation of receipt of a notice Facsimile transmission of any notice or document shall constitute delivery.E-mail transmission of any notice or document (or a direct link to such notice or document)shall constitute delivery when:(i)the e-mail is sent to both Selling Broker and Selling Firm or both Listing Broker and Listing Firm at the e-mail addresses specified on page one of this Agreement;or (ii)Selling Broker or Listing Broker provide written acknowledgment of receipt of the e-mail (an automatic e-mail reply does not constitute written acknowledgment).At the request of either party,or the Closing Agent,the parties will confirm facsimile or e-mail transmitted signatures by signing an original document. Computation of Time.Unless otherwise speci?ed in this Agreement,any period of time measured in days and stated in this Agreement shall start on the day following the event commencing the period and shall expire at 9.00 pm of the last calendar day of the speci?ed period of time.Except for the Possession Date,if the last day is a Saturday,Sunday or legal holiday as de?ned in RCW 1.16.050,the speci?ed period of time shall expire on the next day that is not a Saturday,Sunday or legal holiday.Any speci?ed period of 5 days or less.except for any time period relating to the[E 9/9/2018 8:22:?;éPMPDT9/9/2018 8:27:35 PM PDT Buyer's initials Date Buyer's Initials Date Seller's initials Produced with zlpFdrm®by zipLcigix 15070 Fltteen Mlle Road Fraser.Michigan 48026 '33“?Seller's Initials www ;ipVLggl);C0tV! Date 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 Q5 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 1141 115 116 117 118 iii Litlit‘ Page 113 of 368 Docusign Envelope ID:7BSSBADQ-A499-4048-8668-FD838B975D5B \F/00712-‘I:d P h &S I ©Copyright 2017 acant an urc ase a e VACANT LAND puRCHAsE AND SALE AGREEMENT Northwest Multiple Listing Service f;:;e2“/1O7f5 GENECRA{LTERMS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED on Iriue Possesion Date,shall not include Saturdays.Sundays or legal holidays.If the parties agree that an event will occur on a 119 speci?c calendar date,the event shall occur on that date,except for the Closing Date,which,if it falls on a Saturday.120 Sunday,legal holiday as defined in RCW 1.16.050,or day when the county recording of?ce is closed,shall occur on the 121 next day that is not a Saturday,Sunday,legal holiday,or day when the county recording office is closed.If the parties 122 agree upon and attach a legal description after this Agreement is signed by the offeree and delivered to the offeror,then 123 for the purposes of computing time,mutual acceptance shall be deemed to be on the date of delivery of an accepted 124 offer or counteroffer to the offeror,rather than on the date the legal description is attached.Time is of the essence of 125 this Agreement 126 l.integration and Electronic Signatures.This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the parties and 127 supersedes all prior or contemporaneous understandings and representations.No modi?cation of this Agreement shall 128 be effective unless agreed in writing and signed by Buyer and Seller.The parties acknowledge that a signature in 129 electronic form has the same legal effect and validity as a handwritten signature.130 m.Assignment.Buyer may not assign this Agreement,or Buyer's rights hereunder,without Seller's prior written consent,131 unless the parties indicate that assignment is pennitted by the addition of ‘and/or assigns‘on the line identifying the 132 Buyer on the ?rst page of this Agreement.133 n.Default.In the event Buyer fails,without legal excuse,to complete the purchase of the Property,then the following 134 provision,as identi?ed in Specific Term No.7,shall apply:135 i.Forfeiture of Earnest Money.That portion of the Earnest Money that does not exceed ?ve percent (5%)of the 136 Purchase Price shall be forfeited to the Seller as the sole and exclusive remedy available to Seller for such failure.137 ii.Seller's Election of Remedies.Seller may,at Seller's option,(a)keep the Earnest Money as liquidated damages 138 as the sole and exclusive remedy available to Seller for such failure,(b)bring suit against Buyer for Sellers actual 139 damages,(c)bring suit to speci?cally enforce this Agreement and recover any incidental damages,or (d)pursue 140 any other rights or remedies available at law or equity.141 o.Professional Advice and Attorneys’Fees.Buyer and Seller are advised to seek the counsel of an attorney and a 142 certified public accountant to review the terms of this Agreement.Buyer and Seller shall pay their own fees incurred for 143 such review.However,if Buyer or Seller institutes suit against the other concerning this Agreement the prevailing party 144 I5 entitled to reasonable attorneys‘fees and expenses.145 p.Offer.Buyer shall purchase the Property under the terms and conditions of this Agreement,Seller shall have until 9:00 146 p.m.on the Offer Expiration Date to accept this offer,unless sooner withdrawn.Acceptance shall not be effective until a 147 signed copy is received by Buyer,by Selling Broker or at the licensed of?ce of Selling Broker.if this offer is not so 148 accepted,it shall lapse and any Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer.149 q.counteroffer.Any change in the terms presented in an offer or counteroffer,other than the insertion of or change to 150 Seller's name and Sellers warranty of citizenship status,shall be considered a counteroffer.If a party makes a 151 counteroffer,then the other party shall have until 9:00 p.m.on the counteroffer expiration date to accept that 152 counteroffer,unless sooner withdrawn.Acceptance shall not be effective until a signed copy is received by the other 153 party,the other party's broker,or at the licensed office of the other party's broker.If the counteroffer is not so accepted,154 it shall lapse and any Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer.155 r.Offer and counteroffer Expiration Date.If no expiration date is speci?ed for an offer/counteroffer,the 156 offer/counteroffer shall expire 2 days after the offerlcounteroffer is delivered by the party making the offer/counteroffer,157 unless sooner withdrawn.158 s.Agency Disclosure.Selling Firm,Selling Firm‘s Designated Broker,Selling Broker's Branch Manager (if any)and 159 Selling Broker’s Managing Broker (if any)represent the same party that Selling Broker represents.Listing Firm,Listing 160 Firm's Designated Broker,Listing Broker's Branch Manager (if any),and Listing Broker's Managing Broker (if any)161 represent the same party that the Listing Broker represents.If Selling Broker and Listing Broker are different persons 162 affiliated with the same Firm,then both Buyer and Seller con?nn their consent to Designated Broker,Branch Manager 163 (if any),and Managing Broker (if any)representing both parties as dual agents.if Selling Broker and Listing Broker are 164 the same person representing both parties then both Buyer and Seller con?rm their consent to that person and his/her 165 Designated Broker,Branch Manager (if any),and Managing Broker (if any)representing both parties as dual agents.All 166 parties acknowledge receipt of the pamphlet entitled “The Law of Real Estate Agency.‘167 t.Commission.Seller and Buyer shall pay a commission in accordance with any listing or commission agreement to 168 which they are a party.The Listing Firm's commission shall be apportioned between Listing Firm and Selling Firm as 169 speci?ed in the listing.Seller and Buyer hereby consent to Listing Finn or Selling Firm receiving compensation from 170 more than one party.Seller and Buyer hereby assign to Listing Firm and Selling Firm,as applicable,a portion of their 171 funds in escrow equal to such commission(s)and irrevocably instruct the Closing Agent to disburse the commission(s)172 directly to the Firm(s).In any action by Listing or Selling Firm to enforce this paragraph,the prevailing party is entitled to 173 {Kiel 9/9/2018 8:22:33{Fr2JtélPDT 9/9/2013 3:27:35 pM p[)T Buyer'sInitials Date Buyers Initials Date Seller's Initials Date setters inmais page Produced Wl|h zipromvo by LIPLOQIX19070 Fifteen we Road,Fraser,Michigan 48026 mm Dradic Page 114 of 368 Docuslgn Envelope ID:7B65BA09-A499-4048-B668-FD838B975D5B Form 25 @Copyright 2017 N rth tM It le L'stIn Service‘R’§§_a’2‘§,L7‘”“‘°“'°““°“5”VACANT LAND PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ‘’A{Vf,§,,G;‘,T'§RE'sEF?,,ED Page 5 of5 GENERAL TERMS Continued court costs and reasonable attorneys’fees.Seller and Buyer agree that the Firms are intended third party beneficiaries 174 under this Agreement.175 u.Feasibility Contingency.It is the Buyer’s responsibility to verify before the Feasibility Contingency Expiration Date 176 identi?ed in Specific Term No.15 whether or not the Property can be platted,developed and/or built on (now or in the 177 future)and what it will cost to do this.Buyer should not rely on any oral statements concerning this made by the Seller,178 Listing Broker or Selling Broker Buyer should inquire at the city or county,and water,sewer or other special districts in 179 which the Property is located.Buyer's inquiry should include,but not be limited to:building or development moratoriums 180 applicable to or being considered for the Property;any special building requirements,including setbacks,height limits oi 181 restrictions on where buildings may be constructed on the Property;whether the Property is affected by a flood zone,182 wetlands,shorelands or other environmentally sensitive area;road,school,?re and any other growth mitigation or 183 impact fees that must be paid;the procedure and length of time necessary to obtain plat approval and/or a building 184 permit;suf?cient water,sewer and utility and any service connection charges;and all other charges that must be paid.185 Buyer and Buyer‘s agents,representatives,consultants,architects and engineers shall have the right.from time to time 186 during and after the feasibility contingency,to enter onto the Property and to conduct any tests or studies that Buyer 187 may need to ascertain the condition and suitability of the Property for Buyers intended purpose.Buyer shall restore the 188 Property and all improvements on the Property to the same condition they were in prior to the inspection.Buyer shall be 189 responsible for all damages resulting from any inspection of the Property performed on Buyer’s behalf If the Buyer does 190 not give notice to the contrary on or before the Feasibility Contingency Expiration Date identi?ed in Specific Term No 191 15,it shall be conclusively deemed that Buyer is satisfied as to development and/or construction feasibility and cost It 192 Buyer gives notice this Agreement shall terminate and the Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer,less any unpaid 193 costs.194 Seller shall cooperate with Buyer in obtaining permits or other approvals Buyer may reasonably require for Buyer's 195 intended use of the Property;provided that Seller shall not be required to incur any liability or expenses in doing so.196 v.Subdivision.if the Property must be subdivided,Seller represents that there has been preliminary plat approval for the 197 Property and this Agreement is conditioned on the recording of the ?nal plat containing the Property on or before the 198 date speci?ed in Speci?c Term No.14.if the final plat is not recorded by such date,this Agreement shall terminate and 199 the Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer.200 w.Information Veri?cation Period.Buyer shall have 10 days after mutual acceptance to verify all information provided 201 from Seller or Listing Firm related to the Property.This contingency shall be deemed satis?ed unless Buyer gives notice 202 identifying the materially inaccurate information within 10 days of mutual acceptance.If Buyer gives timely notice under 203 this section,then this Agreement shall terminate and the Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer.204 3:.Property Condition Disclaimer.Buyer and Seller agree.that except as provided in this Agreement,all representations 205 and information regarding the Property and the transaction are solely from the Seller or Buyer,and not from any Broker 205 The parties acknowledge that the Brokers are not responsible for assuring that the parties perform their obligations 207 under this Agreement and that none of the Brokers has agreed to independently investigate or confirm any matter 208 related to this transaction except as stated in this Agreement,or in a separate writing signed by such Broker.in 209 addition,Brokers do not guarantee the value,quality or condition of the Property and some properties may contain 210 building materials,including siding,roo?ng,ceiling,insulation,electrical,and plumbing,that have been the subject of 211 lawsuits and/or governmental inquiry because of possible defects or health hazards.Some properties may have other 212 defects arising after construction,such as drainage,leakage,pest,rot and mold problems.Brokers do not have the 213 expertise to identify or assess defective products.materials,or conditions.Buyer is urged to use due diligence to 214 inspect the Property to Buyer’s satisfaction and to retain inspectors quali?ed to identify the presence of defective 215 materials and evaluate the condition of the Property as there may be defects that may only be revealed by careful 216 inspection.Buyer is advised to investigate whether there is a suf?cienl water supply to meet Buyer‘s needs.Buyer is 217 advised to investigate the cost of insurance for the Property,including.but not limited to homeowners,flood,218 earthquake,landslide,and other available coverage.Brokers may assist the parties with locating and selecting third 219 party service providers,such as inspectors or contractors,but Brokers cannot guarantee or be responsible for the 220 services provided by those third parties.The parties shall exercise their own judgment and due diligence regarding 221 third-party service providers.222 E2:9/9/2018 8:22:33 @:;'PDT9/9/2018 8:27:35 PM PDT Buyer‘s initials Date Buyer‘s Initials Date Seller's Initials Date setters initials [3319 Produced mm zipromm by 2IpLGglx mom Fllteen Mile Road,Fraser,Michigan 43025 v~«w;igLgm_cg;;i |)r.iilit- Page 115 of 368 Docusrgn Envelope ID:7B65BA09-A499-404843668-FD838B975D5B 4L;svr~I EXHIBITA [Legal Description} Franklin County Tax Parcel #:118.512.119 Legally Described As: lo1 1 RIVERHILLS ADDITION.according to ma pint lhurnol recorded In Volumu ''D''or plnlsr Page 99,records of Franklin CounlvcW=5M"B‘°"- L ‘Z LE 9/9/2018 8:22:33 PM PDT E2‘9/9/2018 8:27:35 PM PDT Page 116 of 368 Docusigri Envelope ID:7865BA09-A499-4048-8668-FD838B975D58 I 2017Ef’n‘.~’,"n§i?’§Addendum FINANCING ADDENDUM To NonhweS°it’t’.tiI§iL‘l.s..,1g Rev 2/17 PURCHASE &SALE AGREEMENT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Page 1 of 3 The following is part of the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 7!2°13 1 between Helidoro Carrillo,Nanci Elizondo-Carrillo (“Buyer")2 Buyer Buyer and City of Pasco ("Seller")3 Seller Seller concerning nka Dradie Street,Pasco,Washington 99301 (the "Property")4 Address City State Zip 1.LOAN APPLICATIONIWAIVEROF CONTINGENCY.5 a.Loan Application.This Agreement is contingent on Buyer obtaining the following type of loan or loans to 6 purchase the Property (the "Loan(s)"):H Conventional First;[I Conventional Second;[I Bridge;El VA;EIFHA:7 DUSDA;[3 Home Equity Line of Credit;C]Other 8 (the “Financing Contingency”).Buyer shall paynzl $60,00000 ;orlZl %ofthe Purchase 9 Price down,in addition to the Loans.Buyer shall make application for the Loans to pay the balance of the 10 Purchase Price and pay the application fee,if required,for the subject Property within days (5 11 days if not ?lled in)after mutual acceptance of this Agreement.For the purposes of this Addendum,12 “application"means the submission of Buyers financial information for the purposes of obtaining an extension 13 of credit including Buyer's name,income,social security number (if required),the Property address,purchase 14 price,and the loan amount.15 b.Waiver ofFinancing Contingency.If Buyer (i)fails to make application for financing for the Property within 16 the agreed time;(ii)changes the type of loan at any time without Sel|er’s prior written consent;or (iii)changes 17 the lender without Seller's prior written consent after the agreed upon time to apply for financing expires,then 18 the Financing Contingency shall be deemed waived.Buyer's waiver of the Financing Contingency under this 19 Paragraph 1(b)also constitutes waiver of Paragraph 7 (Appraisal Less Than Sales Price).For purposes of 20 this Addendum,“lender”means either the party to whom the application was submitted or the party funding 21 the loan.22 2.LOAN INFORMATION.23 a.Seller's Request for Loan Information.At any time days (10 days if not filled in)after mutual 24 acceptance,Seller may give,once,a notice requesting information related to the status of Buyer's loan 25 application (“Request for Loan Information").NWMLSForm 22AL may be used for this notice.26 b.Buyer’s Loan Information Notice.Within days (3 days if not ?lled in)of receiving Seller's Request 27 for Loan Information,Buyer shall give notice of the status of Buyer's loan application ("Loan Information 28 Notice”),Buyer‘s notice shall be on NWMLS Form 22AP and shall include the date of application,the name 29 of lender,a list of the information that Buyer has provided to lender,and a warranty that Buyer has provided 30 all information requested by lender.31 c.Failure to Provide Loan Information Notice.If Buyer fails to timely give to Seller a completed Loan 32 Information Notice,Seller may give the Right to Terminate Notice described in Paragraph 3 (Sellers Right to 33 Tenninate)at any time after the date that the Loan Information Notice is due.34 3.SELLER’S RIGHT TO TERMINATE.35 a.Right to Terminate Notice.At any time days (30 days if not filled in)after mutual acceptance,36 Seller may give notice that Seller may terminate the Agreement at any time 3 days after delivery of that notice 37 (the "Right to Terminate Notice").NWMLSForm 22AR may be used for this notice.38 b.Termination Notice.If Buyer has not previously waived the Financing Contingency,Seller may give notice of 39 termination of this Agreement (the “Termination Notice")any time following 3 days after delivery of the Right 40 to Terminate Notice.If Seller gives the Termination Notice before Buyer has waived the Financing 41 Contingency,this Agreement is terminated and the Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer.NWMLS Form 42 ZMR shall be used for this notice.If not waived,the Financing Contingency shall survive the Closing Date.43 c.Appraisal Less Than Sales Price.Buyer's waiver of the Financing Contingency under this Paragraph 3 |:l will.44 orlj will not (will,if not filled in)constitute waiver of Paragraph 7 (Appraisal Less Than Sales Price).45 [E 9/9/2018 8:22,”5;“pm.9/9/2018 8:27:35 PM PDT Buyers Initials 0316 Buyer's Initials Date Seller's Initials Date Se|ler‘s Initials Dale \Vinr.lcrmercReal Estate/Tri-Citiizs,329 North Kellogg Kitnncwick WA 99336 I’lione'(509)430-2378 Fax Rob Ellsworth l)r:i.|u- Produced with zipForm®by zipLogix 18070 Fifteen Mile Road,Fraser,Michigan 43026 mr?v_zipLogix ggrn Page 117 of 368 Docllsign Envelope ID:7B65BA09-A499-4048-8665-FD838B975DSB El?:;“d§%’;Addendum FINANCING ADDENDUMTo ddddwd‘§i°il’5.¥lii‘;‘l?d‘i.'d;Service Rev 2/17 PURCHASE &SALE AGREEMENT ALL RlGHTS RESERVED Page 2 0‘3 Continued 4.LOAN COST PROVISIONS.Seller shall pay up to D $;orEi 0-000 %of the Purchase 46 Price ($0.00 if not filled in),which shall be applied to Buyer's Loan(s)and settlement costs,including prepaids,loan 47 discount,loan fee,interest buy down,?nancing,closing or other costs allowed by lender.That amount shall include 48 the following costs that lender is prohibited from collecting from Buyer:(a)up to $300.00 for Buyer's Loan(s)and 49 settlement costs for FHAIUSDANA loans;and (b)Buyer’s share of the escrow fee for a VA loan.Seller shall pay the 50 costs for (a)and (b),even ifthe amount agreed upon in this Paragraph 4 is insufficient to pay for those costs.51 5.EARNEST MONEY.lf Buyer has not waived the Financing Contingency,and is unable to obtain ?nancing by 52 Closing after a good faith effort then,on Buyer's notice,this Agreement shall terminate.The Earnest Money shall 53 be refunded to Buyer after lender confirms in writing (a)the date Buyer's loan application for the Property was 54 made,including a copy of the loan estimate that was provided to Buyer;(b)that Buyer possessed suf?cient funds 55 to close;and (c)the reasons Buyer was unable to obtain financing by Closing.lf Seller tenninates this Agreement,56 the Earnest Money shall be refunded without need for such confirmation.57 6.INSPECTION.Seller agrees to permit inspections required by lender,including but not limited to structural,pest,58 heating,plumbing,roof,electrical,septic,and well inspections.Seller is not obligated to pay for such inspections 59 unless otherwise agreed.60 7.APPRAISAL LESS THAN SALE PRICE.61 a.Notice of Low Appraisal.If lender's appraised value of the Property is less than the Purchase Price,Buyer 62 may,within 3 days after receipt of a copy of lenders appraisal,give notice of low appraisal,which shall 63 include a copy of lender's appraisal.NWMLS Form 22AN may be used for the notices in this Paragraph 7.64 b.Sel|er’s Response.Seller shall,within 10 days after Buyer's notice of low appraisal,give notice of:65 (i)A reappraisal or reconsideration of value,at Seller's expense.by the same appraiser or another appraiser 66 acceptable to lender,in an amount not less than the Purchase Price.Buyer shall promptly seek lender's 67 approval of such reappraisal or reconsideration of value.The parties are advised that lender may elect 68 not to accept a reappraisal or reconsideration of value;69 (ii)Seller's consent to reduce the Purchase Price to an amount not more than the amount speci?ed in the 70 appraisal or reappraisal by the same appraiser,or an appraisal by another appraiser acceptable to 71 lender,whichever is higher.(This provision is not applicable if this Agreement is conditioned on FHA,VA,72 or USDA financing.FHA,VA,and USDA financing does not permit the Buyer to be obligated to buy if the 73 Seller reduces the Purchase Price to the appraised value.Buyer,however,has the option to buy at the 74 reduced price.);75 (iii)Seller's proposal to reduce the Purchase Price to an amount more than the amount speci?ed in the 76 appraisal and for Buyer to pay the necessary additional funds (the amount the reduced Purchase Price 77 exceeds the appraised value)to close the sale;or 78 (iv)Seller's rejection of Buyer's notice of low appraisal.79 If Seller timely delivers notice of (i)reappraisal or,reconsideration of value;or (ii)consent to reduce the 80 Purchase Price to an amount not more than the amount specified in the appraisal.and lender accepts Seller's 81 response,then Buyer shall be bound by Seller's response.82 C.Buyer's Reply.83 (i)Buyer shall have 3 days from either Seller's notice of rejection of low appraisal or,if Seller fails to respond,84 the day Seller's response period ends,whichever is earlier,to (a)waive the Financing Contingency;or (b)85 terminate the Agreement,in which event the Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer.86 (ii)If Seller proposes to reduce the Purchase Price to an amount more than the appraised value,Buyer shall 87 have 3 days to (a)accept and represent that Buyer has sufficient funds to close the sale in accordance with 88 this provision;or (b)terminate the Agreement,in which event the Earnest Money shall be refunded to Buyer.89 Buyer's inaction during this reply period shall result in termination of the Agreement and return of the Earnest 90 Money to Buyer.The Closing Date shall be extended as necessary to accommodate the foregoing times for 91 notices.92 Mr‘9/9/2018 8:22:33p%~1PDT9/9/2018 8:27:35 PM PDT Buyer's iniiiais Dale Bi-iver'Siniiiais Daie Seller‘;Initials Date Seller's Initials Date Produced with zIpForm®by ZipLoglx (8070 Fifteen Mile Road.Fraser.Michigan 46026 @_Dradic Page 118 of 368 Docusign Envelope lD:7865BAO9-A499-4048-B668-FDE385975053 ©Copyright 2017lI:i°r'Ir:'a'r]1§ft;Addendum FINANCING ADDENDUMTo Northwest Multiple Listing Service Rev.2/17 PURCHASE &SALE AGREEMENT ALLRIGHTS RESERVED Page 3 07 3 Continued 8.FHANAIUSDA -Appraisal Certi?cate.If this Agreement is contingent on Buyer obtaining FHA,VA,or USDA ?nancing,notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement,Buyer is not obligated to complete the purchase of the Property unless Buyer has been given in accordance with HUD/FHA,VA,or USDA requirements a written statement by FHA,VA,USDA or a Direct Endorsement lender,setting forth the appraised value of the Property (excluding closing costs).Buyer shall pay the costs of any appraisal.If the appraised value of the Property is less than the Purchase Price,Paragraph 7 above shall apply. Purpose of Appraisal.The appraised valuation is arrived at only to determine the maximum mortgage FHA.VA, 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 or USDA will insure.FHA,VA,or USDA do not warrant the value or the condition of the Property.Buyer agrees to1OO satisfy himself/herself that the price and condition of the Property are acceptable.101 9.EXTENSION OF CLOSING.it,through no fault of Buyer,lender is required by 12 CFR 1026 to give correctedtoz disclosures to Buyer due to (a)a change in the Annual Percentage Rate (“APR”)of Buyer's Loan(s)by 125%ori03 more for a fixed rate loan or 250%or more for an adjustable rate loan;(b)a change in the loan product;or (c)the104 addition of a prepayment penalty,then upon notice from Buyer,the Closing Date shall be extended for up to 4 days105 to accommodate the requirements of Regulation Z of the Truth in Lending Act.This paragraph shall survive Buyer"s106 waiver of this Financing Contingency. E 9/9/2013 8:22:3 pm 9/9/2018 8:27:35 PM PDT Buyer's Initials Date Buyer's Initials Date Sel|er‘s Initials Date Seller's Initials Dale Produced with zIpForrr\®by 2IpLogIX 18070 Fifteen Mile Road,Fraser,Michigan 43025 mm,z;gLg_qg_;_am |;,,,.i,,. 107 Page 119 of 368 Docuslgn Envelope ID:7B6SBA09-A499-4048-8668»FD838B975D5B F0"\'1_22K__._ ©Copyright 2014 lgenti?calionoiUtilities Addendum |DEN'|'|F|cA'|'|oN OF UT”_|‘|'|ES Northwest Multiple Listing Senrice P§;e5{‘,3,ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT A”“HTS RESERVED The following is part of the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 7 ,2018 between Helidoro Carrillo,Nancy Elizondo-Carrillo ("Buyer") Buyer Buyer and City of Pasco ("Seller") Seller Seller concerning nka Dradie street-.,Pasco,Washington 99301 (the "Property"). Address City State Zip Pursuant to RCW60.80,Buyerand Seller request the Closing Agent to administer the disbursement of closing funds necessary to ‘satisfy unpaid utility charges,if any,affecting the Property.The names and addresses of all utilities providing service to the Property and having lien rights are as follows: WATER DISTRICT:City of Pasco Name Address City.State.Zip Fax,No. SEWER DISTRICT: Name Address City,State.Zip Fax.No. IRRIGATION DlSTR|CT' Name Address City.State,Zip Fax.No. GARBAGE:Basin Disposal Name Address City.State,Zip Fax.No. ELECTRICITY:Franklin PUD Name Address Ciw.State.Zip Fax.No. GAS‘ Name Address City.State‘Zip Fax.No. SPECIAL DlSTRlCT(S): (local improvement districts or Name utility local improvement districts) Address City,State.Zip Fax.No. If the above information has not been filled in at the time of mutual acceptance of this Agreement,then (1) within days (5 if not filled in)of mutual acceptance of this Agreement,Seller shall provide the Listing Broker or Selling Broker with the names and addresses of all utility providers having lien rights affecting the Property and (2)Buyer and Seller authorize Listing Broker or Selling Broker to insert into this Addendum the names and addresses of the utility providers identified by Seller. Nothing in this Addendum shall be construed to diminish or alter the Sel|er’s obligation to pay all utility charges (including unbilled charges).Buyer understands that the Listing Broker and Selling Broker are not responsible for,or to insure payment of,Seller's utility charges. W.9/9/2018 8:22 :33 Pjir-“EDT9/9/2018 8:27:35 PM PDT Buyers Initials Date Buyer's initials Date Date seller-5 initials \\1...ml 1 m.i.-in (the;321:’\orllt mitt“;kmnnnck WA 9931:;Phone (509)410-2113 Fix “W Produced with zipForm®by zipLagix 113070 Fifteen Mile Road,Fraser.Michigan 43026 Sellers initials Dale 2 3 m xlmui 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Dludii: Page 120 of 368 Docusign Envelope ID:7B65BA09-A499-4048-8668-FD838B975D5B Form 35E ©Copyr>ght 2015 Escalation Addendum Northwest Multiple Listlng Service Rev.7/15 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED P3951 °”ESCALATION ADDENDUMTO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT The following is part of the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated September 7 ,2018 _ 1 between He-lidoro Carrillo,Nancy Elizondo—Carr:i.llo _("Buyer")2 Buyer Buyer and City of Pasco ("Seller")3 Seller Seller concerning nka Dradie Street,Pasco,Washington 99301 (the ‘‘Property‘')4 Address City State Zip NOTICE TO BUYER:By including this Addendum in the Agreement,you agree to have your purchase price 5 increased if Seller receives an equal or higher offer from another buyer (the "Competing Offer“).This Addendum does 6 not assure that the Competing Offer used to establish your purchase price will,in all ways,be comparable to yours 7 You are cautioned to offer no more than you are willing to pay for the Property.You are further advised that Seller or 8 Seller's broker(s)may disclose the terms of your offer,including this Addendum,to others.9 1.PURCHASE PRICE.If Seller receives a Competing Offer for the Property prior to accepting this offer,with a 10 Net Price equal to or greater than the Net Price of this offer,then the Net Price of this offer shall be 11 increased to S 500 .00 more than the Net Price of the Competing Offer.In no event,however,shall the 12 new purchase price of this offer exceed $130 ,000 .O0 .The term "Net Price"means the stated purchase 13 price (or the maximum price if the Competing Offer contains a price escalation clause)less any price adjustments 14 such as credits to Buyer for closing costs.15 2.COMPETING OFFER.A Competing Offer must be a bona ?de,arm's length,written offer on NWMLS or similar 16 forms,containing all material terms necessary for an enforceable agreement which (a)requires the full purchase 17 price to be paid in cash at closing;(b)provides for closing no Iaterthan 45 days (60 days if not filled in)18 from the date of this offer;and (c)is not contingent on the sale of the buyer's property (i.e.no NWMLS Form 228 19 or equivalent).A Competing Offer may include other conditions,such as a buyer's pending sale of property 20 contingency (i.e.NWMLS Form 22Q or equivalent).21 3.SELLER’S ACCEPTANCE.Seller's escalation of this offer shall not be effective unless it is accompanied 22 by a complete copy of any Competing Offer used to escalate the purchase price,including any escalation 23 provision.24 4.NEW PURCHASE PRICE WORKSHEET.The following formula is provided to assist the parties in calculating the 25 new purchase price.The worksheet can only be completed when the purchase price of the Competing Offer is 26 known.The accuracy or completeness of the calculation shall not render this Agreement unenforceable,and to 27 the extent the following calculations are inconsistent with the escalation provisions above,the escalation 28 provisions shall control.29 Purchase Price of Competing Offer $130900 30 (or the maximum purchase price of the Competing Offer if it contains an escalation provision) Less Credits to Buyer in Competing Offer $ 0 31 ..130.000CompetingOfferNetPurchasePrice$32 Plus Escalation Amount (this offer)$33 Plus Any Credits to Buyer (this offer)$34 New Purchase Price (this offer)$130000 35 Q?’9/9/2013 s:22:33@rPDT 9/9/2018 8:27:35 PM PDT Buyer's Initials Date Buyer's Initials Date Seller's Initials Date Seller's Initials Dale WlndisrincrcReal E:Iuti:fl'ri-Cities,32‘)Nurl|1Kcllogg KciincwickWA 99336 Phone (5U9)43l)-237K Fax.Rnb Ellsworth llimlru Produced with zipronne by zIpLogix 19070 Fifteen Mile Road Fraser.Michigan «asoze mm zglggig gm Page 121 of 368 L)ocuSIgn Envelope ID.BDDBFQB8-D24C—48AE-9608-56E3F630776B Form 34 Addendum/Amendment to P86 Rev.7/10 Page 1 of 1 ADDENDUMIAMENDMENTTO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT The following is part of the Purchase and Sale Agreement dated between Helidoro Carrillo,Nancy Elizondo-Carrillo and City of Pasco concerning nka Dradie StreetL Pasco,Washing_I:on 99301 IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE SELLER AND BUYERAS FOLLOWS: Purchase to be all cash with no financing contingency. ©Copyn‘ght 2010 Northwest Multiple Listing Service ALLRIGHTS RESERVED Segatember 7,2018 ("Buyer") ("Seller") (the ''Property‘'). Lot sale to be subject to deed restriction that will prevent lot from being subdivided . ND CONDITIONS of said Agreement remain unchanged.ALL OTHER TE “S 9/18/2018 12:35:28 PM PDT Initials:BUYER:Date:.:'3.§§LF:ll‘?i=s. BUYER:Date:SELLER: \V milcriucrc Ru-ullistalcffri-Cilies,329 North Kellogg KenncwickWA 99336 Plmuc l5t)‘1l430-Z373 Fax Rob [Ellsworth Produced with zlpF0rm®by zipLogix 13070 Filteen Mlle Road,Fraser.Michigan 48026 mM¢; Date: Date: Dmdic Page 122 of 368 Item: Lot Size Comparison Map - Riverhill Lot 1Applicant: City of Pasco WAFile #: EXEC 2017-021 Exhibit#1SITELegendUnder .5 Acres.5 to 1.0 Acres1.0 to 1.25 Acres1.25 to 1.5 AcresOver 1.5 AcresPage 123 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 24, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Serrano Heights (MF# PP 2018-007) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Preliminary Plat Proposed Resolution Report to the Planning Commission Dated: 7/19/2018, 8/16/2018 and 9/20/2018 Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 7/19/2018, 8/16/2018 and 9/20/2018 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ___, approving the Preliminary Plat for Serrano Heights III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 19, which was reopened on August 16, and then continued to September 20, 2018 to develop a recommendation for the City Council on the preliminary plat for Serrano Heights. The proposed plat is located between Road 68 to the east and proposed Elementary School #16 and Riverhawk Pointe II to the west. Following the hearing, the Planning Commission determined that with conditions, the preliminary plat should be recommended for approval. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached resolution. Page 124 of 368 No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. V. DISCUSSION: The proposed plat contains approximately 38.1 acres that will be divided into 109 lots. The lots range in size from 7,306 square feet to 25,977 square feet in size. The average lot size for the plat will be 9,810 square feet. If approved, the developer will be responsible for sharing in the construction of Chapel Hill Boulevard to the north along with improvements for Road 76. Road 76 will become a collector arterial street that will connect south of the irrigation canal to Argent Road, and the developer will be responsible for developing a portion of the canal crossing for Road 76. A Local Improvement district (LID) was assembled for Chapel Hill Boulevard and as per proposed condition #10. The LID would be seen as acceptable in the fulfillment of the requirements for the development of Chapel Hill Boulevard. The conditions of the proposed resolution include signing a "no protest agreement" for the formation of and participation in an LID for the development of Road 76. Page 125 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 126 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetPage 127 of 368 318,671 SF488,954 SF399,062 SF388,979 SF378,976 SF368,976 SF358,792 SF348,976 SF339,551 SF328,976 SF3010,144 SF4211,567 SF448,954 SF458,954 SF468,954 SF478,954 SF499,895 SF518,503 SF6411,146 SF5711,406 SF568,503 SF558,503 SF548,543 SF538,503 SF528,503 SF5011,186 SF5811,158 SF599,568 SF609,592 SF619,718 SF629,592 SF1920,570 SF189,728 SF1710,278 SF1611,869 SF1512,852 SF1413,562 SF139,346 SF,9999979 SSSSSSSSF4113,856 SF66SF4011,295 SF439,455 SF639,546 SF238,580 SF248,580 SF258,580 SF268,580 SF278,580 SF2011,280 SF288,580 SF218,580 SF2911,405 SF228,580 SF8555558L=44.4'L=2 4.9'73.0'110.0'55.8'L=37.5'13.8'L=34.4'19.5'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'17.5'119.8'127.5'L=61.0'136.9'60.2'69.0'83.7'L=91.0'120.0'L=30.6'40.0'L=31.4'58.0'L=29.4'97.6'L=45.0'L=19.9 'L=52.6'133.4'88.7'L =5 6 .8'134.4'L=48.1'163.5'L=51.6'L=41.8'L=141.2'91.6'L=51.4'91.6'L=115.4'110.0'L=9.5'L=1 4 .2'57.1'L=39.0'L=6.0'98.3'19.4'59.4'110.0'8.6'L=22.7'110.0'86.4'38.9'48.3'110.0'87.2'29.0'58.2'110.0'88.3'19.1'69.3'110.0'87.2'8.0'77.7'1.5'75.8'11.2'110.0'87.0'66.1'36.2'26.6'L=103.0'L=28 .5 'L=43.1'9.7'110.0'70.1'L=45.5'L=36.0'L=103.0'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.7'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'98.8'L=2 8.1'15.6'L=25.0'25.0'110.0'37.6'L=16.7'16.1'L=27.5'95.8'63.9'24.8'4.8'74.1'7.3'110.0'81.4'74.3'7.1'110.0'81.4'79.7'1.7'110.0'81.4'79.9'1.5'110.0'81.4'78.4'3.0'110.0'81.4'110.4'81.4'78.6'11.9'69.7'57.0'130.1'L=45.7'33.2'L=109.0'L=27.5'L=55.1'24.6'3.4'25.6'90.0'90.0'L=7.8 '118.3'L=23.5'58.0'L=31.4 '110.0'35.3'L=97.4'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'79.9'110.0'81.6'110.0'86.8'110.0'81.6'110.0'78.8'82.1'L=12.0'L=3 6.8'3.4'L=56.3'8.4'898,264 SF908,015 SF9417,038 SF76.3'919,479 SF9210,542 SF939,644 SF869,748 SF878,231 SF979,612 SF10813,829 SF10713,304 SF10610,968 SF1059,603 SF1048,595 SF1038,154 SF10210,014 SF10111,390 SF10011,174 SF9910,243 SF9810,145 SF9513,632 SF968,833 SF668,888 SF788,504 SF718,888 SF708,888 SF698,888 SF688,888 SF678,888 SF658,888 SF728,504 SF738,504 SF748,504 SF758,504 SF768,504 SF778,504 SF110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'8310,691 SF799,580 SF808,543 SF819,392 SF827,306 SF859,940 SF848,621 SF107.1'103.7'.28,691 SF33.3'79.0'79.0' 38.7'L=45.3'L=88.8'110.0'L=69.2'L=35.4'38.7' 79.0' 79.0'128,691 SF118,691 SF108,691 SF98,691 SF88,691 SF78,691 SF68,691 SF58,691 SF48,691 SF38,691 SF18,691 SF33.3'L=49 .8'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=48.6'18.6'L6'6'=3233.9'9970.4'L27.4'15.8'LL==2L=40.5'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=711.88'L=71.8'L=41.5'110.0'110.0'LL==5599..55 ''110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'10925,977 SF2.1'22222222222340.6'58.7'L=54.9'50.7'7550555550500000000050000000000500366.1'3333333331'''1140.5'L=2 922 .9'9970.2'L=32.9'59.3'91.3'L=30.1'L=16.8LL'88LLL116.6'L=50.1'141.7'45.8'92.5'104.2'L=35 .7 '115.4'L=36.2'107.1'7.1'7.1'114.2'116.8'L=35.3'79.7'5.3'.364.4'L=44.3'108.4'L=32.9'33.0'''L=16.8 'L88=88 33.5'L=3 7 .9 'L=41.4'L=36.0'L=50.6'100.5'L=16.8 '36.0'L=31.4'3378.1'96.7'39.1'L=25.6'8.8'8LL23.7'73.5'20.9'88L=15.12222L ==11=LL==1 LL9 .9'99L==688.1'147.0'120.2'80.3'20.4'23.4'145.5'53.0'45.3'120.1'72.6'10.7'108810,444 SF120.8'52.5'52.5'133.4'133.4'L=42.4'L=39.7'112.1'L=17.33'L=L1LL6LL.8=='8836.2'L=3133.4'44108.4'4488666688222222222139.9'L=17.88'65.3'117.3'L=36.8'47.5'L=49.5'L=44.1'33.7'138.2'91.7'LL..8888=8825.6'74.0'133.9'31.4'L=49.8'4.7'4125.7'74.5'74.0'40.1'L=43.50.7'7''125.3'FF2.6'6L=48.1'2.1'.119.7'FFL=22.44'37.8'74.0'74.0'142.5'FF49.1'L''=36.1'65.8'L=8..2'161.5'FFL=39.5'38.3'L=47.3'162.9'L=46.4'38.2'L55=5544.8'33L''==11.5'LL=21.9'36.0'143.2'68.1'75.4'127.2'L=17.66'59.5'27.5'L=32.28.9'22''L8.98.=9914.88'130.0'28.1'L''=39.0'L11=4400..8888.8833'''LL11=44==4444001880888933.9 'L=62.1'109.8'86.8'L=49.7'102.4'144.6'63.7'110.0'57.2'L=16.8'L1166=88388''3.6'L=85.4'70.4'14.2'1L=65.9'26.2'L.2.=2229.9 '54.7'10.7'66.6'77.3'7.2'770.1'77.3'110.0'80.8'110.0'80.8'110.0'80.8'73.6'110.0'80.8'3.7'777.1'110.0'0.2'.77.3'110.0'2.4'2..74.9'77.3'109.9'L=12.4'74.1'82.8'L=33.3'76.0'L=3133.4'4464.3'L 22.=1122222222 ===.7 LL'0.2'.2.L=170011222'2229.7'L=70.7'8.9'L33=45.0'PHASE 3 - 49 LOTSAS9LO399SSSS7111PHASE 1 - 23 LOTSPHASE 3 - 49 LOTSPHASE 2 - 37 LOTSPHASE 2 - 37 LOTSR55'55559PHASE 1 - 23 LOTSPHASE 3 - 49 LOTSOTPHHASSerrano HeightsA project in the City of Pasco, WAPreliminary plat for:July 25, 2018Date:0074.00JF Eng. Job #5220 S. Auburn PlKennewick, WA 99337(509) 551-8174 PHNwww.JFEngineering.proCIVIL ENGINEERINGPROJECT MANAGEMENTPLANNINGENGINEERING, PLLCChecked by: JEFDrawn by: KWETATEOFWASHNG T ON JOHNERICFETTER O L F DEDDREENIGNELANOIISSEFORP C100Scale V: N/AScale H: 1"=80'Know what'sR'C' LANECENTRAL CT.'D' LANEMASSEY DRIVEVALLEY VIEW PLACE'A' LANE'B' LANENORTH DRIVEW. NO R T H C T.CHAPEL HILL BLVD.E. NORTH CT.EXISTING 100' EASMENT117-510-039RIVERHAWK POINTE II PRELIMINARY PLATSERRANO HEIGHTS SUBDIVISIONLOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T 9 N, R 29 E OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIANPROPERTY BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PROVIDED BY HDJ, A DIVISION OF PBS,2017.BASIS OF BEARING IS: NAD83/91 WASHINGTON STATEPLANE, SOUTH ZONE HOLDING THE COORDINATES FORPOINT 1507 PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3774, BEING ABRASS CAP IN CASE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OFSECTION 16, T9N, R29E, W.M., LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF ARGENT ROAD AND ROAD 84. THENGVD29 ELEVATION OF 390.12 AS LISTED BY CITY OF PASCO(PSI #53-16) FORTHIS MONUMENT WAS HELD.VERTICAL DATUM IS CITY OF PASCO DATUM, PSI10-33, ELEV: 357.65TAX ID # OF SUBJECT PARCEL: 117-510-036COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIALLAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION: R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALCURRENT PROPERTY USE: AGRICULTURALTOTAL PARCEL AREA:38.1 Ac, 1,659,196 SFPHASE 1: 23 LOTSPHASE 2: 37 LOTSPHASE 3: 49 LOTSTOTAL LOTS: 109AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 9,810 SFMIN. LOT SIZE: 7,306 SF (LOT 82)LARGEST LOT SIZE: 25,977 SF (LOT 109)R/W AREA: 346,375 SFANTICIPATED TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION SPRING2019 AND COMPLETE BY 2023, DEPENDANT UPONMARKET CONDITIONS.PUBLIC STREETS, UTILITIES, AND STORMWATERPUBLIC STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITYOF PASCO STANDARD 3-2A, LOCAL ACCESSSTREETS AND CUL-DE-SAC BULB. THIS SECTIONINCLUDES CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS.CITY POTABLE WATER, IRRIGATION, ANDSANITARY SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED TO EACHLOT WITHIN THE PLAT. FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BEINSTALLED AND LOCATED PER THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY FIRE CHIEF.SANITARY SEWER EXISTS WITHIN AN EASEMENTTHROUGH THIS PROJECT AND WILL BE UTILIZEDTO SERVE THIS PROJECT.STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL BE COLLECTEDFROM PUBLIC STREETS AND DISPOSED OF,ONSITE, IN LOCALIZED SUBSURFACEINFILTRATION SYSTEMS.STREET LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITYOF PASCO STANDARDS.PROPERTY AND PLAT STATISTICSLEGENDLOT #LOT TOTAL AREARESIDENTIALRIVER...ADJACENT USEADJACENT SUBDIVISION NAME117-510-033CO TAX ID #UNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)30'30'30'30'117-510-167EXTG 10"IRRIGATIONPROP E RT Y B O U N D A R Y 117-510-038117-641-062117-641-071EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENT FCID CANALFCID CANALEXISTING 50'CANAL ROWEXISTING 20'EASEMENT(RESIDENTIAL)(RESIDENTIAL)ROAD 76EXISTING IRRIGATIONPIVOTCHIAWANA PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT117-510-037CHIAWANA HIGH SCHOOL117-590-010EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYCHAPEL HILL BLVD.30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'110.0110 0110 0110 030'66R55'R55'R55'40'PROPERTY BOUNDARYAAAAAAAAAARARRRRRRRYRYRYYYYYYYY30'0'0000000030'EXISTING 30'EASEMENTEXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 30'G330GEASEMENTVICINITY MAP1" = 2,000'±RD 76RD 72RD 80ARGENT RD.I-182RD 84RD 68BURDEN BLVD.HILL BLVD.CHAPELLSITEEUNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)UNDEVELOPED(OFFICE)40'UTILESMT7/25/18SSSSSSSTTTTTTJOEREERTSIGEGRE38322NELANOISSEFORPPPPPPPPPP Page 128 of 368 RESOLUTION NO.______ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SERRANO HEIGHTS. WHEREAS, RCW 58.17 enables the City to uniformly administer the process of subdividing property for the overall welfare of the community; and, WHEREAS, owners and developers of property situated on Lot 4 of Record Survey 1847849 in Section 16, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, WM., have requested approval of a preliminary plat; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Serrano Heights plat and developed findings related thereto and said findings are hereby adopted by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission found the proposed plat promoted the general welfare of the community and recommended said preliminary plat be approved with conditions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That the preliminary plat for Serrano Heights located on Lot 4 of Record Survey 1847849 in Section 16, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, WM., is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The developer shall install common "Estate" type fence/wall six-feet in height along Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76 as a part of the infrastructure improvements associated with the plat. The fence/wall must be constructed of masonry block. A fencing detail must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. An approved vision triangle at the intersection of streets will be required. Following construction of the masonry fence/wall the City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep of the fence/wall. These fencing requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the final plat(s). A concrete mow strip shall be installed under any common fence as directed by the City Parks Division and shall be approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. Alternative designs may be considered and accepted by the Director of Community & Economic Development. 4. Excess right-of-way along Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard must be landscaped. Said landscaping shall include irrigation, turf, and trees. Trees shall be planted at 50 foot intervals. The species of the trees will be determined by the Parks Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department Page 129 of 368 prior to installation. Water usage for City right-of-way landscaping shall come from a source approved by the City of Pasco with the connection and meter fees paid for by the developer. 5. The sidewalks on Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard shall be offset to accommodate the planting strip required in Number 4 above. 6. The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $475 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. The City shall not accept maintenance responsibility for the landscaping abutting said streets until such time as all fees are collected for each phase that abut said streets. 7. Lots abutting Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard shall not have direct access to said streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of deed restrictions and/or statements on the face of the final plat(s). 8. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 9. The owner/developer is responsible for one quarter of the cost of installing the Road 76 canal crossing, but based upon the need to connect to Argent Road, may be required to build the crossing at the time of the development with the expectation of reimbursement through a future latecomer’s agreement. This contribution shall be in the form a cash deposit to the City in an amount determined by the City Engineer to ensure the completion of the canal crossing. Said deposit must be accompanied by a signed development agreement ensuring the developer's full proportionate share of the crossing is covered in the event the initial deposit falls short of the final construction costs. The owner/ developer must sign a non- protest agreement to the formation of an LID to cover the cost of the share of the canal crossing. Said non-protest agreement may also include the development's share of the required Road 76 improvements. The non-protest agreement shall be recorded, run with the property and be binding upon successors in the property ownership and must be executed within 10 days of Preliminary Plat approval by City Council. The formation and approval of an LID for these improvements shall be deemed sufficient for the fulfilment of this condition. 10. The owner/developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of an LID for the construction of Chapel Hill Boulevard and/or Road 76. The non-protest agreement shall be recorded, run with the property and be binding upon successors in the property ownership and must be executed within 10 days of Preliminary Plat approval by City Council. The formation, approval of and participation in an LID for these improvements shall be deemed sufficient for the fulfilment of the Chapel Hill Boulevard portion of this condition 11. The developer shall prepare a traffic study in accordance with standard practices—the scope and results of which must be approved by the City. The study must consider impacts both with and without a Chapel Hill Boulevard connection to Road 68, and with and without a Valley view connection to Road 68. The cumulative impacts of the proposed subdivision must be considered on the capacity of the intersections of Road 76 and Argent Road, Massey Drive and Road 68, Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 68, and Road 68 and Argent at minimum. The Traffic study must recommend necessary improvements to address capacity issues and the efficient diffusion of traffic through the neighborhood. These recommendations may include participation in the installation of a traffic signal at Argent/Road 76; construction of a roundabout at Road 76 and Chapel Hill, construction of a Page 130 of 368 canal crossing as identified in condition #9 above, and any other mitigation efforts outlined by the results of said traffic study. The results and recommendations of the traffic study— once approved by the City—shall become conditions upon the preliminary plat and must be implemented prior to final plat approval. The formation, approval of and participation in an LID for Chapel Hill Boulevard shall be deemed sufficient for the fulfilment of this condition. 12. The developer shall provide the necessary right-of-way at the southeast corner of Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard for a roundabout at said intersection. 13. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat." Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this ______ day of October, 2018. __________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ _____________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 131 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2018-007 HEARING DATE: 7/19/2018 ACTION DATE: 8/16/2018 APPLICANT: RP Development 6159 W Deschutes Ave Suite 509 Kennewick WA 99336 BACKGROUND REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Serrano Heights, (104-Lot Single-Family Subdivision). 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 4 of Record Survey 1847849 General Location: South of Future Chapel Hill Blvd between Roads 70 & 76 Property Size: 38.1 Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 104 single-family lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 8,154 ft² to 20,571 ft² Average Lot Square Footage: 10,186 ft² 2. ACCESS: The property is proposed to have access from Chapel Hill Boulevard, Valley View Place, Road 76 and Massey Drive. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal sewer service is located in future Massey Drive extension along the southern portion of the site. Water service will be located primarily in Massey Drive and Chapel Hill Boulevard. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (Low-Density Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 Vacant; DNR Lease Property EAST: C-1; O; R-1 Vacant & Single-Family SOUTH: R-S-1 Vacant; Chiawana Place Subdivision WEST R-1 Vacant; Riverhawk Pointe II Subdivision 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for low-density residential development. According to the Comprehensive Plan, low-density residential development means 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future land use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II, page 17) encourages development of lands designated for low-density residential uses when or where sewer is available; the location is suitable for home sites and there is a market demand for new home sites. Policy H-1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership, and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU-2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. Page 132 of 368 2 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non- Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11-355). ANALYSIS The project site is located south and west of property held in trust by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), who expects to lease their land to commercial developers. Also to the east is the Valley View Addition, which is located in a County island and is built out with single-family homes. The property to the south has been preliminarily platted as the Chiawana Place subdivision and is zoned at a lower density (R-S-1; 10,000 square foot minimum lot size) as a transition between the R-1 on site and the lower density (RS-20) county areas to the south. Property directly to the west will be developed with future phases of the Riverhawk Pointe II subdivision, and further west along Massey Drive will be the Pasco School District Elementary School #16. The site was part of the Road 68 DNR property which sold off a few years ago. The applicant is seeking preliminary plat approval in preparation for the development of a single-family subdivision. The site was initially designated for low-density residential development under the 1982 Comprehensive Plan and again under the 1995 Plan and the updated Plan of 2008. The property is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). The proposed plat will provide additional lots within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) for single-family homes consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The old DNR site is one of the few large remaining areas within the UGA to be developed. The proposed plat can be considered an infill development on property that was passed over during the time most of the I-182 Corridor was developed. The proposed plat was originally part of a larger parcel that extended easterly from Road 84 to the west boundary of Valley View Addition. Improvement of portions of Chapel Hill Boulevard to the north will be the responsibility of the developer of the proposed plat along with improvements for Road 76 and Valley View Place. Road 76 will become a collector arterial street that will connect south of the irrigation canal to Argent Road. As such the developer will be responsible for developing a portion of the canal crossing for Road 76. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 104 residential lots. The lots vary in size from 8,154 to 20,571 square feet. The average lot size is 10,186 square feet. The proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the R-1 zoning on the site and the R-S-1 zoning to the south. The minimum lot size for the R-1 zone is 7,200 square feet. Page 133 of 368 3 RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets, which will be dedicated. The east half of Road 76 will be finished with this subdivision to match the improvements in the future Riverhawk Pointe II subdivision. The developers of Riverhawk Pointe II will build the west side of the street. Improvements with this plat could also include the easterly extension of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 and improvements to Valley View Place, which is expected to be an extension of, and renamed Massey Drive. With Road 76 extending south to Argent Road the developer will need to participate in the construction of the canal crossing. UTILITIES: Municipal water service will need to be extended to the site from Road 84, Road 68, future Chapel Hill Boulevard, and/or future Chiawana Heights. All utility lines will be extended through the plat and must be guided by the Comprehensive Water, Sewer and Irrigation Plans. A sewer trunk line is located along the south portion of the site about 150 feet north of the FCID canal. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not diminish the buildable area of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of less than 300 feet on residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets. The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street. STREET NAMES: The proposed street names following a river theme will be added prior to final plat approval. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines as part of the infrastructure improvements. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact:" Page 134 of 368 4 Prevent Overcrowding: Density requirements of the R-1 zone are designed to address overcrowding concerns. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property in question be developed with 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Plat has a density of approximately 2.7 units per acre. No more than 40 percent of each lot is permitted to be covered with structures per the R-1 standards. Parks Opens Space/Schools: There are no City parks in the immediate vicinity, however; the School District has express a desire to work with the City on the development of a park on the school site west of Road 80. City parks have been co-located with McGee, Franklin, McClintock, Maya Angelo and Whitter schools. A park impact fee will be assessed at the time permits are issued for each house in the subdivision to help cover the cost of the future park. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new dwelling unit at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The Plat is laid out for single- family development as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density permitted under the Comprehensive Plan is 5 dwelling units per acre. The developer is proposing a density of approximately 2.7 units per acre. The proposed development will include improvements to both Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to current City standards and to the standards of the American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of all intersection will be installed with the construction of the road improvements and the sidewalks along Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76 will be installed with the infrastructure improvements. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the Plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This Preliminary Plat contains 104 residential building lots, providing an opportunity for the construction of 104 new dwelling units in Pasco. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitations, building height restrictions and building setbacks will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The streets through and adjoining the Plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained Page 135 of 368 5 to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by Road 76, Chapel Hill Boulevard, Massey Drive, and potentially Valley View Place. The Preliminary Plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review (The discussion under “Safe Travel” above applies to this section also). At this time there is no guarantee that Chapel Hill will connect to Roads 68 or 84, thus limiting access to the Plat. Development of Chapel Hill Boulevard all the way through from Road 68 to Road 84 via the LID process between all property owners along said route should be a condition of Plat approval. Valley View Place is currently a dead-end road located in a Franklin County island off of Road 68 and aligned with the future extension of Massey Drive. During most hours of the day and particularly at rush hour it is very difficult to make left turns in or out of the street, and doing so can be dangerous. As well, the Valley View Place intersection is located close to two signaled intersections on Road 68, namely Chapel Hill Boulevard and Argent Road. Adding more ingress/egress traffic at this location would likely snarl traffic at that location, necessitating installation of a traffic signal. Adding another signaled intersection this close to the two existing signals may also compound traffic issues along Road 68. One option would be to realign Massey Drive north to connect to future Chapel Hill Boulevard to avoid a direct connection to Valley View Place; another option would be to close off Valley View at Road 68, redirecting Valley View traffic west and out to either Argent to the south or to the future Chapel Hill Boulevard to the north. A traffic analysis is needed to address the above issues, specifically how and where plat access should occur, and what improvements should be required at Argent Road, Chapel Hill Boulevard, Roads 68 and 84, at the very least. Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates the Plat site for low-density residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings:  The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary.  The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within the Urban Growth Boundaries.  The site is relatively flat with undulations and slopes toward the south.  The site is currently vacant.  The site is not considered a critical area, a mineral resource area or a wetland.  The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for low-density residential development. Page 136 of 368 6  Low-density residential development is described in the Comprehensive Plan as two to five dwelling units per acre.  The site is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential).  The developer is proposing approximately 2.7 dwelling units per acre.  The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the advancement of programs that promote home ownership and development of a variety of residential densities and housing types.  The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the interconnection of neighborhood streets to provide for the disbursement of traffic.  The interconnection of neighborhood streets is necessary for utility connections (looping) and the provision of emergency services.  Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 995 vehicle trips per day.  The current traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the I-182 Corridor when warranted.  The current park impact fee is $1,420 per dwelling unit. The fee can be reduced by 58 percent if a developer dedicates a five acre park site to the City. The dedication of a fully constructed park reduces the fee by 93 percent.  RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved.  The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012.  Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools.  Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped-accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses, except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements.  Water lines and fire hydrants are required to be looped. Page 137 of 368 7  Per PMC 12.36.050 the developer must extend all utilities to and through the subject parcel.  All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum.  All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans.  Storm water runoff and infiltration calculations must comply with the Storm Water Management Manual for Easter Washington, they must be provided for review and approval. Storm water calculations must be prepared, stamped, signed and dated by a currently licensed Professional Engineer registered in the State of Washington.  The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160.  The developer is responsible for all costs associated with construction, inspection, and plan review service expenses incurred by the City Engineering Office.  The developer is responsible for installing irrigation lines, which shall be installed per City of Pasco Standard Detail 3-1. Irrigation mains shall be required along Chapel Hill Boulevard, Road 76, and all internal streets.  The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner that does not injure, annoy, or endanger the comfort and repose of other property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including houses.  Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval.  The final plat will contain 10-foot utility easements parallel to all streets. Additional easement will be provided as needed by utility providers.  Road 76 will become a collect arterial street connecting Chapel Hill Boulevard with Argent Road. This connection will require a crossing over Page 138 of 368 8 the FCID canal. The developer will be responsible for a portion (one quarter) of the canal crossing.  The Comprehensive Water Plan calls for a 12 inch line running north and south in Road 76 with a 12 inch connection west to Road 84.  The Irrigation Master Plan calls for a 12 inch line running north and south in Road 80.  To properly serve the proposed subdivision one or more Pressure reducing valves may be needed. The design and installation of which is typically the responsibility of the developer. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the PUD, the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable, franklin County Irrigation District and Ben-Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. The proposed plat has the potential to be partially or wholly “landlocked” if adequate provision for connections to Argent Road, Roads 68 and 84 and future Chapel Hill Boulevard. The approval conditions need to provide for a solution to this potential. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. City parks are located in the subdivisions to the west and southwest of the site. All new developments participate in establishing parks through the payment of park fees at the time of permitting. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed Plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for the looping of utilities and interconnectivity of streets as supported in the Page 139 of 368 9 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision will provide arterial street improvements along Chapel Hill Boulevard and connect to Argent Road via Road 76. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low-density residential development. Low-density residential development is described as 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Plan encourages the promotion of a variety of residential densities and suggests the community should support the advancement of programs encouraging home ownership. The Transportation Element of the Plan suggests major streets should be beautified with trees and landscaping. The Plan also encourages the interconnection of local streets for inter-neighborhood travel for public safety as well as providing for traffic disbursement. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e., school impact fees are paid). (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. The proposed Plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will ensure the public use and interest are served. TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. Page 140 of 368 10 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The developer shall install common "Estate" type fence/wall six-feet in height along Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76 as a part of the infrastructure improvements associated with the plat. The fence/wall must be constructed of masonry block. A fencing detail must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. An approved vision triangle at the intersection of streets will be required. Following construction of the masonry fence/wall the City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep of the fence/wall. These fencing requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the final plat(s). A concrete mow strip shall be installed under any common fence as directed by the City Parks Division and shall be approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. 4. Excess right-of-way along Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard must be landscaped. Said landscaping shall include irrigation, turf, and trees. Trees shall be planted at 50 foot intervals. The species of the trees will be determined by the Parks Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. Water usage for City right-of-way landscaping shall come from a source approved by the City of Pasco with the connection and meter fees paid for by the developer. 5. The sidewalks on Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard shall be offset to accommodate the planting strip required in Number 4 above. 6. The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $475 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. The City shall not accept maintenance responsibility for the landscaping abutting said streets until such time as all fees are collected for each phase that abut said streets. 7. Lots abutting Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard shall not have direct access to said streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of deed restrictions and/or statements on the face of the final plat(s). 8. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 9. The owner/developer is responsible for one quarter of the cost of installing the Road 76 canal crossing, but based upon the need to connect to Argent Road, may be required to build the crossing at the time of the development with the expectation of reimbursement through a future latecomer’s agreement. This contribution shall be in the form a cash deposit to the City in an amount determined by the City Engineer to Page 141 of 368 11 ensure the completion of the canal crossing. Said deposit must be accompanied by a signed development agreement ensuring the developer's full proportionate share of the crossing is covered in the event the initial deposit falls short of the final construction costs. The owner/ developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of an LID to cover the cost of the share of the canal crossing. Said non-protest agreement may also include the development's share of the required Road 76 improvements. The non-protest agreement shall be recorded, run with the property and be binding upon successors in the property ownership and must be executed within 10 days of Preliminary Plat approval by City Council. 10. The owner/developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of an LID for the construction of Chapel Hill Boulevard and/or Road 76. The non-protest agreement shall be recorded, run with the property and be binding upon successors in the property ownership and must be executed within 10 days of Preliminary Plat approval by City Council. 11. The developer shall prepare a traffic study in accordance with standard practices—the scope and results of which must be approved by the City. The study must consider impacts both with and without a Chapel Hill Boulevard connection to Road 68. The cumulative impacts of the proposed subdivision must be considered on the capacity of the intersections of Road 76 and Argent Road, Massey Drive/Valley View Court and Road 68, Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 68, and Road 68 and Argent at minimum. The Traffic study must recommend necessary improvements to address capacity issues and the efficient diffusion of traffic through the neighborhood. These recommendations may include participation in the installation of a traffic signal at Argent/Road 76; installation of a traffic signal at Massey Drive/Valley View Court and Road 68; construction of a roundabout at Road 76 and Chapel Hill, construction of a canal crossing as identified in condition #9 above, and any other mitigation efforts outlined by the results of said traffic study. The results and recommendations of the traffic study—once approved by the City—shall become conditions upon the preliminary plat and must be implemented prior to final plat approval. 12. The developer shall provide the necessary right-of-way at the southeast corner of Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard for a roundabout at said intersection. 13. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full Page 142 of 368 12 advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/ or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat." RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and set August 16, 2018 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. Page 143 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 144 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetPage 145 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetNew SFResidentialDevelopmentProposedElementarySchoolMH ParkChiawanaHighSchoolVacant--Platted forSF ResidentialDevelopmentVacant--Platted for SFResidentialDevelopmentVacantCommercialMulti-FamilySFDUsSFDUs(County)SFDUsSFDUs (County)SFDUsVac.Vac.FSCommercialPage 146 of 368 ZoningMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetR-1RPC-1C-1R-4R-1RS-20(County)RS-12RS-20 (County)RS-20C-1C-1"O"RS-20RS-1R-3R-3Page 147 of 368 210,025 SF510,025 SF410,025 SF310,025 SF110,025 SF838,671 SF808,954 SF919,062 SF908,979 SF898,976 SF888,976 SF878,792 SF868,976 SF859,551 SF848,976 SF8210,144 SF7411,567 SF768,954 SF778,954 SF788,954 SF798,954 SF819,895 SF668,503 SF6411,146 SF7211,406 SF718,503 SF708,503 SF698,543 SF688,503 SF678,503 SF6511,186 SF5811,158 SF599,568 SF609,592 SF619,718 SF629,592 SF1009,623 SF1049,623 SF1039,623 SF1029,623 SF1019,623 SF999,623 SF9510,778 SF989,800 SF979,800 SF969,800 SF949,925 SF9311,470 SF5710,392 SF5210,117 SF399,686 SF5510,315 SF5610,477 SF5410,117 SF539,020 SF4410,158 SF4210,873 SF419,001 SF409,947 SF389,999 SF4310,531 SF4510,165 SF5011,086 SF5111,086 SF4713,080 SF4810,541 SF4911,182 SF4610,098 SF1220,570 SF119,728 SF1010,278 SF911,869 SF812,852 SF713,562 SF69,346 SF3716,568 SF7313,856 SF9211,295 SF759,455 SF639,546 SF3610,441 SF2313,829 SF2910,014 SF3011,390 SF3116,994 SF3210,479 SF338,362 SF348,428 SF359,448 SF288,154 SF278,595 SF269,603 SF2510,968 SF2413,304 SF168,580 SF178,580 SF188,580 SF198,580 SF208,580 SF1311,280 SF218,580 SF148,580 SF2211,405 SF158,580 SFL=44.4'L=2 4.9'73.0'110.0'55.8'L=37.5'13.8'L=34.4'19.5'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'17.5'119.8'127.5'L=61.0'136.9'60.2'69.0'83.7'L=91.0'120.0'L=30.6'40.0'L=31.4'58.0'L=29.4'97.6'L=45.0'L=19.9 'L=52.6'133.4'88.7'L =5 6 .8'134.4'L=48.1'163.5'L=51.6'L=41.8'L=141.2'91.6'L=51.4'L=59.5 'L=115.4'110.0'L=9.5'L=1 4 .2'L=102.4'110.0'L=79.9'L=31.7 '62.9'110.0'62.9'L=24.7 '91.1'110.0'91.1'76.0'L=13.8'110.0'L=16 .6'76.0'L=63.2'L=29.7'70.2'L=33.0'L=82.2'110.0'L=78.3'L=33.0'70.2'L=29.7'L=59.9'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=40.8'42.6'110.0'42.6'L=49.0'87.5'110.0'87.5'86.6'L=54.4'L=16.8'29.4'106.2'129.1'L=42.8'124.1'29.6'106.0'L =4 6.4'142.9'137.7'L=36.3'111.4'24.4'16.2'102.8'L=45.4'144.2'82.4'111.7'L=32.9'33.0'L=16.8 'L=39.9'105.0'102.8'L=35.8'L=16.8'36.2'L=31.4'L=49.0'147.7'L=40 .6 '134.3'101.4'L=54.6'79.0'53.0'27.2'97.5'L=51.9'16.7'78.0'102.3'103.8'L=33.4'7.0'69.4'110.5'56.1'L=16.8 '110.5'91.9'8.1'84.0'110.5'91.9'91.9'90.5'L=31.4'76.1'5.0'91.0'L=31.4'64.3'L=15.1'23.4'111.0'74.2'113.7'17.1'L=48.3'1.8'125.5'83.2'123.6'77.3'96.7'74.9'83.1'L=3.8'L=15.3'135.7'L=15.6'L=0.5'38.6'L=54.9'58.7'134.1'102.2'134.1'61.3'127.7'74.0'74.0'127.7'L=17.0'57.0'43.3'L=14.5'128.4'59.0'L=15.1'L=42.1'14.5'133.1'74.0'75.9'150.1'L=69.2'5.9'37.1'L=57.9'38.2'L=4.8'161.5'L=8.2'L=39.5'38.3'142.5'65.8'49.1'L=36.1'119.7'74.0'L=22.4'37.8'125.3'74.0'2.6'L=48.1'2.1'125.7'40.1'L=43.5'0.7'74.5'133.9'74.0'31.4'L=49.8'4.7'138.2'74.0'91.7'L=25.6'139.9'L=44.1'33.7'L=17.8'65.3'117.3'L=36.8'47.5'L=49.5'L=31.4'90.0'92.7'110.0'72.8'2.6'79.4'110.0'82.0'15.9'83.3'L=65.9'26.2'L=29.9 '69.3'110.0'70.1'L=16.8'L=33.6'L=85.4'110.0'95.2'90.0'L=3 1.4'75.2'57.1'L=39.0'L=6.0'98.3'19.4'59.4'110.0'8.6'L=22.7'110.0'86.4'38.9'48.3'110.0'87.2'29.0'58.2'110.0'88.3'19.1'69.3'110.0'87.2'8.0'77.7'1.5'75.8'11.2'110.0'87.0'66.1'36.2'26.6'L=103.0'L=28 .5 'L=43.1'9.7'110.0'70.1'L=45.5'L=36.0'L=103.0'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.7'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'98.8'L=2 8.1'15.6'L=25.0'25.0'110.0'37.6'L=16.7'16.1'L=27.5'95.8'63.9'24.8'4.8'74.1'7.3'110.0'81.4'74.3'7.1'110.0'81.4'79.7'1.7'110.0'81.4'79.9'1.5'110.0'81.4'78.4'3.0'110.0'81.4'110.4'81.4'78.6'11.9'69.7'57.0'130.1'L=45.7'33.2'L=109.0'L=27.5'L=55.1'24.6'3.4'25.6'90.0'90.0'L=7.8 '118.3'L=23.5'58.0'L=31.4 '110.0'35.3'L=97.4'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'79.9'110.0'81.6'110.0'86.8'110.0'81.6'110.0'78.8'82.1'L=12.0'L=3 6.8'3.4'L=56.3'8.4'6688884466.800TRACT ATRTR4,487 SF42.1'222143.4'64.4'487 487 139.8'PHASEHASSE 2 - 31 LOTSLOT-11SESESS001111PHASE 1 - 24 LOTSPHASE 3 - 30 LOTSPHASE 3 - 30 LOTSPHASE 4 - 19 LOTSSerrano HeightsA project in the City of Pasco, WAPreliminary plat for:May 25, 2018Date:0074.00JF Eng. Job #5220 S. Auburn PlKennewick, WA 99337(509) 551-8174 PHNwww.JFEngineering.proCIVIL ENGINEERINGPROJECT MANAGEMENTPLANNINGENGINEERING, PLLCChecked by: JEFDrawn by: KWETATEOFWASHNG T ON JOHNERICFETTER O L F DEDDREREENIGNELANOIISSEFORP C100Scale V: N/AScale H: 1"=80''C' LANECENTRAL DRIVECENTRAL CT.'D' LANEVALLEY VIEW PLACEVALLEY VIEW PLACE'A' LANE'B' LANENORTH DRIVEW. NO R T H C T.CHAPEL HILL BLVD.E. NORTH CT.EXISTING 100' EASMENT117-510-039RIVERHAWK POINTE II PRELIMINARY PLATSERRANO HEIGHTS SUBDIVISIONLOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T 9 N, R 29 E OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIANPROPERTY BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PROVIDED BY HDJ, A DIVISION OF PBS,2017.BASIS OF BEARING IS: NAD83/91 WASHINGTON STATEPLANE, SOUTH ZONE HOLDING THE COORDINATES FORPOINT 1507 PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3774, BEING ABRASS CAP IN CASE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OFSECTION 16, T9N, R29E, W.M., LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF ARGENT ROAD AND ROAD 84. THENGVD29 ELEVATION OF 390.12 AS LISTED BY CITY OF PASCO(PSI #53-16) FORTHIS MONUMENT WAS HELD.VERTICAL DATUM IS CITY OF PASCO DATUM, PSI10-33, ELEV: 357.65TAX ID # OF SUBJECT PARCEL: 117-510-036COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIALLAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION: R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALCURRENT PROPERTY USE: AGRICULTURALTOTAL PARCEL AREA:38.1 Ac, 1,659,196 SFPHASE 1: 24 LOTSPHASE 2: 31 LOTSPHASE 3: 30 LOTSPHASE 4: 19 LOTSTOTAL LOTS: 104AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10,186 SFMIN. LOT SIZE: 8,154 SF (LOT 28)LARGEST LOT SIZE: 20,571 SF (LOT 12)R/W AREA: 359,350 SFANTICIPATED TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION SPRING2019 AND COMPLETE BY 2023, DEPENDANT UPONMARKET CONDITIONS.PUBLIC STREETS, UTILITIES, AND STORMWATERPUBLIC STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITYOF PASCO STANDARD 3-2A, LOCAL ACCESSSTREETS AND CUL-DE-SAC BULB. THIS SECTIONINCLUDES CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS.CITY POTABLE WATER, IRRIGATION, ANDSANITARY SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED TO EACHLOT WITHIN THE PLAT. FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BEINSTALLED AND LOCATED PER THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY FIRE CHIEF.SANITARY SEWER EXISTS WITHIN AN EASEMENTTHROUGH THIS PROJECT AND WILL BE UTILIZEDTO SERVE THIS PROJECT.STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL BE COLLECTEDFROM PUBLIC STREETS AND DISPOSED OF,ONSITE, IN LOCALIZED SUBSURFACEINFILTRATION SYSTEMS.STREET LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITYOF PASCO STANDARDS.PROPERTY AND PLAT STATISTICSLEGENDLOT #LOT TOTAL AREARESIDENTIALRIVER...ADJACENT USEADJACENT SUBDIVISION NAME117-510-033CO TAX ID #UNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)30'30'30'30'30'30'117-510-167EXTG 10"IRRIGATIONPROP E RT Y B O U N D A R Y 117-510-038117-641-062117-641-071EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENT FCID CANALFCCIDCANALFCID CANALFCIDCCANALEXISTING 50'CANAL ROWEXISTING 20'EASEMENT(RESIDENTIAL)(RESIDENTIAL)ROAD 76EXISTING IRRIGATIONPIVOTCHIAWANA PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT117-510-037CHIAWANA HIGH SCHOOL117-590-010EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYCHAPEL HILL BLVD.30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'R55'R55'R55'40'PROPERTY BOUNDARY30'0'30'EXISTING 30'EASEMENTEXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXSTNGG 244 SAN. SEWEREXISTING 30'G330XEASEMENTEVICINITY MAP1" = 2,000'±RD 76RD 72RD 80ARGENT RD.I-182RD 84RD 68BURDEN BLVD.HILL BLVD.CHAPELLSITEEUNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)UNDEVELOPED(OFFICE)SSSSSTTTTTTTTTATTJOEREERTSIGEGRE38322ELANOISSEFORPPPPP 5/25/18Page 148 of 368 Looking NorthPage 149 of 368 Looking EastPage 150 of 368 Looking SouthPage 151 of 368 Looking WestPage 152 of 368 Chiawana HS to the Southwest of SitePage 153 of 368 Chapel Hill Boulevard Connect Point to NortheastPage 154 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2018-007 HEARING DATE: 7/19/2018 ACTION DATE: 8/16/2018 APPLICANT: RP Development 6159 W Deschutes Ave Suite 509 Kennewick WA 99336 BACKGROUND REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Serrano Heights, (104-Lot Single-Family Subdivision). 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 4 of Record Survey 1847849 General Location: South of Future Chapel Hill Blvd between Roads 70 & 76 Property Size: 38.1 Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 104 single-family lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 8,154 ft² to 20,571 ft² Average Lot Square Footage: 10,186 ft² 2. ACCESS: The property is proposed to have access from Chapel Hill Boulevard, Valley View Place, Road 76 and Massey Drive. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal sewer service is located in future Massey Drive extension along the southern portion of the site. Water service will be located primarily in Massey Drive and Chapel Hill Boulevard. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (Low-Density Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 Vacant; DNR Lease Property EAST: C-1; O; R-1 Vacant & Single-Family SOUTH: R-S-1 Vacant; Chiawana Place Subdivision WEST R-1 Vacant; Riverhawk Pointe II Subdivision 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for low-density residential development. According to the Comprehensive Plan, low-density residential development means 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future land use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II, page 17) encourages development of lands designated for low-density residential uses when or where sewer is available; the location is suitable for home sites and there is a market demand for new home sites. Policy H-1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership, and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU-2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. Page 155 of 368 2 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non- Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11-355). ANALYSIS The project site is located south and west of property held in trust by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), who expects to lease their land to commercial developers. Also to the east is the Valley View Addition, which is located in a County island and is built out with single-family homes. The property to the south has been preliminarily platted as the Chiawana Place subdivision and is zoned at a lower density (R-S-1; 10,000 square foot minimum lot size) as a transition between the R-1 on site and the lower density (RS-20) county areas to the south. Property directly to the west will be developed with future phases of the Riverhawk Pointe II subdivision, and further west along Massey Drive will be the Pasco School District Elementary School #16. The site was part of the Road 68 DNR property which sold off a few years ago. The applicant is seeking preliminary plat approval in preparation for the development of a single-family subdivision. The site was initially designated for low-density residential development under the 1982 Comprehensive Plan and again under the 1995 Plan and the updated Plan of 2008. The property is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). The proposed plat will provide additional lots within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) for single-family homes consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The old DNR site is one of the few large remaining areas within the UGA to be developed. The proposed plat can be considered an infill development on property that was passed over during the time most of the I-182 Corridor was developed. The proposed plat was originally part of a larger parcel that extended easterly from Road 84 to the west boundary of Valley View Addition. Improvement of portions of Chapel Hill Boulevard to the north will be the responsibility of the developer of the proposed plat along with improvements for Road 76 and Valley View Place. Road 76 will become a collector arterial street that will connect south of the irrigation canal to Argent Road. As such the developer will be responsible for developing a portion of the canal crossing for Road 76. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 104 residential lots. The lots vary in size from 8,154 to 20,571 square feet. The average lot size is 10,186 square feet. The proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the R-1 zoning on the site and the R-S-1 zoning to the south. The minimum lot size for the R-1 zone is 7,200 square feet. Page 156 of 368 3 RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets, which will be dedicated. The east half of Road 76 will be finished with this subdivision to match the improvements in the future Riverhawk Pointe II subdivision. The developers of Riverhawk Pointe II will build the west side of the street. Improvements with this plat could also include the easterly extension of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 and improvements to Valley View Place, which is expected to be an extension of, and renamed Massey Drive. With Road 76 extending south to Argent Road the developer will need to participate in the construction of the canal crossing. UTILITIES: Municipal water service will need to be extended to the site from Road 84, Road 68, future Chapel Hill Boulevard, and/or future Chiawana Heights. All utility lines will be extended through the plat and must be guided by the Comprehensive Water, Sewer and Irrigation Plans. A sewer trunk line is located along the south portion of the site about 150 feet north of the FCID canal. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not diminish the buildable area of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of less than 300 feet on residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets. The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street. STREET NAMES: The proposed street names following a river theme will be added prior to final plat approval. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines as part of the infrastructure improvements. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact:" Page 157 of 368 4 Prevent Overcrowding: Density requirements of the R-1 zone are designed to address overcrowding concerns. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property in question be developed with 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Plat has a density of approximately 2.7 units per acre. No more than 40 percent of each lot is permitted to be covered with structures per the R-1 standards. Parks Opens Space/Schools: There are no City parks in the immediate vicinity, however; the School District has express a desire to work with the City on the development of a park on the school site west of Road 80. City parks have been co-located with McGee, Franklin, McClintock, Maya Angelo and Whitter schools. A park impact fee will be assessed at the time permits are issued for each house in the subdivision to help cover the cost of the future park. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new dwelling unit at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The Plat is laid out for single- family development as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density permitted under the Comprehensive Plan is 5 dwelling units per acre. The developer is proposing a density of approximately 2.7 units per acre. The proposed development will include improvements to both Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to current City standards and to the standards of the American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of all intersection will be installed with the construction of the road improvements and the sidewalks along Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76 will be installed with the infrastructure improvements. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the Plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This Preliminary Plat contains 104 residential building lots, providing an opportunity for the construction of 104 new dwelling units in Pasco. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitations, building height restrictions and building setbacks will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The streets through and adjoining the Plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained Page 158 of 368 5 to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by Road 76, Chapel Hill Boulevard, Massey Drive, and potentially Valley View Place. The Preliminary Plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review (The discussion under “Safe Travel” above applies to this section also). At this time there is no guarantee that Chapel Hill will connect to Roads 68 or 84, thus limiting access to the Plat. Development of Chapel Hill Boulevard all the way through from Road 68 to Road 84 via the LID process between all property owners along said route should be a condition of Plat approval. Valley View Place is currently a dead-end road located in a Franklin County island off of Road 68 and aligned with the future extension of Massey Drive. During most hours of the day and particularly at rush hour it is very difficult to make left turns in or out of the street, and doing so can be dangerous. As well, the Valley View Place intersection is located close to two signaled intersections on Road 68, namely Chapel Hill Boulevard and Argent Road. Adding more ingress/egress traffic at this location would likely snarl traffic at that location, necessitating installation of a traffic signal. Adding another signaled intersection this close to the two existing signals may also compound traffic issues along Road 68. One option would be to realign Massey Drive north to connect to future Chapel Hill Boulevard to avoid a direct connection to Valley View Place; another option would be to close off Valley View at Road 68, redirecting Valley View traffic west and out to either Argent to the south or to the future Chapel Hill Boulevard to the north. A traffic analysis is needed to address the above issues, specifically how and where plat access should occur, and what improvements should be required at Argent Road, Chapel Hill Boulevard, Roads 68 and 84, at the very least. Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates the Plat site for low-density residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings:  The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary.  The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within the Urban Growth Boundaries.  The site is relatively flat with undulations and slopes toward the south.  The site is currently vacant.  The site is not considered a critical area, a mineral resource area or a wetland.  The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for low-density residential development. Page 159 of 368 6  Low-density residential development is described in the Comprehensive Plan as two to five dwelling units per acre.  The site is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential).  The developer is proposing approximately 2.7 dwelling units per acre.  The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the advancement of programs that promote home ownership and development of a variety of residential densities and housing types.  The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the interconnection of neighborhood streets to provide for the disbursement of traffic.  The interconnection of neighborhood streets is necessary for utility connections (looping) and the provision of emergency services.  Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 995 vehicle trips per day.  The current traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the I-182 Corridor when warranted.  The current park impact fee is $1,420 per dwelling unit. The fee can be reduced by 58 percent if a developer dedicates a five acre park site to the City. The dedication of a fully constructed park reduces the fee by 93 percent.  RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved.  The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012.  Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools.  Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped-accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses, except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements.  Water lines and fire hydrants are required to be looped. Page 160 of 368 7  Per PMC 12.36.050 the developer must extend all utilities to and through the subject parcel.  All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum.  All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans.  Storm water runoff and infiltration calculations must comply with the Storm Water Management Manual for Easter Washington, they must be provided for review and approval. Storm water calculations must be prepared, stamped, signed and dated by a currently licensed Professional Engineer registered in the State of Washington.  The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160.  The developer is responsible for all costs associated with construction, inspection, and plan review service expenses incurred by the City Engineering Office.  The developer is responsible for installing irrigation lines, which shall be installed per City of Pasco Standard Detail 3-1. Irrigation mains shall be required along Chapel Hill Boulevard, Road 76, and all internal streets.  The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner that does not injure, annoy, or endanger the comfort and repose of other property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including houses.  Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval.  The final plat will contain 10-foot utility easements parallel to all streets. Additional easement will be provided as needed by utility providers.  Road 76 will become a collect arterial street connecting Chapel Hill Boulevard with Argent Road. This connection will require a crossing over Page 161 of 368 8 the FCID canal. The developer will be responsible for a portion (one quarter) of the canal crossing.  The Comprehensive Water Plan calls for a 12 inch line running north and south in Road 76 with a 12 inch connection west to Road 84.  The Irrigation Master Plan calls for a 12 inch line running north and south in Road 80.  To properly serve the proposed subdivision one or more Pressure reducing valves may be needed. The design and installation of which is typically the responsibility of the developer. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the PUD, the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable, franklin County Irrigation District and Ben-Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. The proposed plat has the potential to be partially or wholly “landlocked” if adequate provision for connections to Argent Road, Roads 68 and 84 and future Chapel Hill Boulevard. The approval conditions need to provide for a solution to this potential. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. City parks are located in the subdivisions to the west and southwest of the site. All new developments participate in establishing parks through the payment of park fees at the time of permitting. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed Plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for the looping of utilities and interconnectivity of streets as supported in the Page 162 of 368 9 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision will provide arterial street improvements along Chapel Hill Boulevard and connect to Argent Road via Road 76. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low-density residential development. Low-density residential development is described as 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Plan encourages the promotion of a variety of residential densities and suggests the community should support the advancement of programs encouraging home ownership. The Transportation Element of the Plan suggests major streets should be beautified with trees and landscaping. The Plan also encourages the interconnection of local streets for inter-neighborhood travel for public safety as well as providing for traffic disbursement. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e., school impact fees are paid). (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. The proposed Plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will ensure the public use and interest are served. TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. Page 163 of 368 10 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The developer shall install common "Estate" type fence/wall six-feet in height along Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76 as a part of the infrastructure improvements associated with the plat. The fence/wall must be constructed of masonry block. A fencing detail must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. An approved vision triangle at the intersection of streets will be required. Following construction of the masonry fence/wall the City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep of the fence/wall. These fencing requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the final plat(s). A concrete mow strip shall be installed under any common fence as directed by the City Parks Division and shall be approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. Alternative designs may be considered and accepted by the Director of Community & Economic Development. 4. Excess right-of-way along Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard must be landscaped. Said landscaping shall include irrigation, turf, and trees. Trees shall be planted at 50 foot intervals. The species of the trees will be determined by the Parks Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. Water usage for City right-of-way landscaping shall come from a source approved by the City of Pasco with the connection and meter fees paid for by the developer. 5. The sidewalks on Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard shall be offset to accommodate the planting strip required in Number 4 above. 6. The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $475 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. The City shall not accept maintenance responsibility for the landscaping abutting said streets until such time as all fees are collected for each phase that abut said streets. 7. Lots abutting Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard shall not have direct access to said streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of deed restrictions and/or statements on the face of the final plat(s). 8. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 9. The owner/developer is responsible for one quarter of the cost of installing the Road 76 canal crossing, but based upon the need to connect to Argent Road, may be required to build the crossing at the time of the development with the expectation of reimbursement through a Page 164 of 368 11 future latecomer’s agreement. This contribution shall be in the form a cash deposit to the City in an amount determined by the City Engineer to ensure the completion of the canal crossing. Said deposit must be accompanied by a signed development agreement ensuring the developer's full proportionate share of the crossing is covered in the event the initial deposit falls short of the final construction costs. The owner/ developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of an LID to cover the cost of the share of the canal crossing. Said non-protest agreement may also include the development's share of the required Road 76 improvements. The non-protest agreement shall be recorded, run with the property and be binding upon successors in the property ownership and must be executed within 10 days of Preliminary Plat approval by City Council. 10. The owner/developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of an LID for the construction of Chapel Hill Boulevard and/or Road 76. The non-protest agreement shall be recorded, run with the property and be binding upon successors in the property ownership and must be executed within 10 days of Preliminary Plat approval by City Council. 11. The developer shall prepare a traffic study in accordance with standard practices—the scope and results of which must be approved by the City. The study must consider impacts both with and without a Chapel Hill Boulevard connection to Road 68, and with and without a Valley view connection to Road 68. The cumulative impacts of the proposed subdivision must be considered on the capacity of the intersections of Road 76 and Argent Road, Massey Drive/Valley View Court and Road 68, Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 68, and Road 68 and Argent at minimum. The Traffic study must recommend necessary improvements to address capacity issues and the efficient diffusion of traffic through the neighborhood. These recommendations may include participation in the installation of a traffic signal at Argent/Road 76; installation of a traffic signal at Massey Drive/Valley View Court and Road 68; construction of a roundabout at Road 76 and Chapel Hill, construction of a canal crossing as identified in condition #9 above, and any other mitigation efforts outlined by the results of said traffic study. The results and recommendations of the traffic study—once approved by the City— shall become conditions upon the preliminary plat and must be implemented prior to final plat approval. 12. The developer shall provide the necessary right-of-way at the southeast corner of Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard for a roundabout at said intersection. 13. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all Page 165 of 368 12 trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat." RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the August 16, 2018 staff report. MOTION: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Serrano Heights, with conditions as listed in the August 16, 2018 staff report. Page 166 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 167 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetPage 168 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetNew SFResidentialDevelopmentProposedElementarySchoolMH ParkChiawanaHighSchoolVacant--Platted forSF ResidentialDevelopmentVacant--Platted for SFResidentialDevelopmentVacantCommercialMulti-FamilySFDUsSFDUs(County)SFDUsSFDUs (County)SFDUsVac.Vac.FSCommercialPage 169 of 368 ZoningMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetR-1RPC-1C-1R-4R-1RS-20(County)RS-12RS-20 (County)RS-20C-1C-1"O"RS-20RS-1R-3R-3Page 170 of 368 210,025 SF510,025 SF410,025 SF310,025 SF110,025 SF838,671 SF808,954 SF919,062 SF908,979 SF898,976 SF888,976 SF878,792 SF868,976 SF859,551 SF848,976 SF8210,144 SF7411,567 SF768,954 SF778,954 SF788,954 SF798,954 SF819,895 SF668,503 SF6411,146 SF7211,406 SF718,503 SF708,503 SF698,543 SF688,503 SF678,503 SF6511,186 SF5811,158 SF599,568 SF609,592 SF619,718 SF629,592 SF1009,623 SF1049,623 SF1039,623 SF1029,623 SF1019,623 SF999,623 SF9510,778 SF989,800 SF979,800 SF969,800 SF949,925 SF9311,470 SF5710,392 SF5210,117 SF399,686 SF5510,315 SF5610,477 SF5410,117 SF539,020 SF4410,158 SF4210,873 SF419,001 SF409,947 SF389,999 SF4310,531 SF4510,165 SF5011,086 SF5111,086 SF4713,080 SF4810,541 SF4911,182 SF4610,098 SF1220,570 SF119,728 SF1010,278 SF911,869 SF812,852 SF713,562 SF69,346 SF3716,568 SF7313,856 SF9211,295 SF759,455 SF639,546 SF3610,441 SF2313,829 SF2910,014 SF3011,390 SF3116,994 SF3210,479 SF338,362 SF348,428 SF359,448 SF288,154 SF278,595 SF269,603 SF2510,968 SF2413,304 SF168,580 SF178,580 SF188,580 SF198,580 SF208,580 SF1311,280 SF218,580 SF148,580 SF2211,405 SF158,580 SFL=44.4'L=2 4.9'73.0'110.0'55.8'L=37.5'13.8'L=34.4'19.5'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'17.5'119.8'127.5'L=61.0'136.9'60.2'69.0'83.7'L=91.0'120.0'L=30.6'40.0'L=31.4'58.0'L=29.4'97.6'L=45.0'L=19.9 'L=52.6'133.4'88.7'L =5 6 .8'134.4'L=48.1'163.5'L=51.6'L=41.8'L=141.2'91.6'L=51.4'L=59.5 'L=115.4'110.0'L=9.5'L=1 4 .2'L=102.4'110.0'L=79.9'L=31.7 '62.9'110.0'62.9'L=24.7 '91.1'110.0'91.1'76.0'L=13.8'110.0'L=16 .6'76.0'L=63.2'L=29.7'70.2'L=33.0'L=82.2'110.0'L=78.3'L=33.0'70.2'L=29.7'L=59.9'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=40.8'42.6'110.0'42.6'L=49.0'87.5'110.0'87.5'86.6'L=54.4'L=16.8'29.4'106.2'129.1'L=42.8'124.1'29.6'106.0'L =4 6.4'142.9'137.7'L=36.3'111.4'24.4'16.2'102.8'L=45.4'144.2'82.4'111.7'L=32.9'33.0'L=16.8 'L=39.9'105.0'102.8'L=35.8'L=16.8'36.2'L=31.4'L=49.0'147.7'L=40 .6 '134.3'101.4'L=54.6'79.0'53.0'27.2'97.5'L=51.9'16.7'78.0'102.3'103.8'L=33.4'7.0'69.4'110.5'56.1'L=16.8 '110.5'91.9'8.1'84.0'110.5'91.9'91.9'90.5'L=31.4'76.1'5.0'91.0'L=31.4'64.3'L=15.1'23.4'111.0'74.2'113.7'17.1'L=48.3'1.8'125.5'83.2'123.6'77.3'96.7'74.9'83.1'L=3.8'L=15.3'135.7'L=15.6'L=0.5'38.6'L=54.9'58.7'134.1'102.2'134.1'61.3'127.7'74.0'74.0'127.7'L=17.0'57.0'43.3'L=14.5'128.4'59.0'L=15.1'L=42.1'14.5'133.1'74.0'75.9'150.1'L=69.2'5.9'37.1'L=57.9'38.2'L=4.8'161.5'L=8.2'L=39.5'38.3'142.5'65.8'49.1'L=36.1'119.7'74.0'L=22.4'37.8'125.3'74.0'2.6'L=48.1'2.1'125.7'40.1'L=43.5'0.7'74.5'133.9'74.0'31.4'L=49.8'4.7'138.2'74.0'91.7'L=25.6'139.9'L=44.1'33.7'L=17.8'65.3'117.3'L=36.8'47.5'L=49.5'L=31.4'90.0'92.7'110.0'72.8'2.6'79.4'110.0'82.0'15.9'83.3'L=65.9'26.2'L=29.9 '69.3'110.0'70.1'L=16.8'L=33.6'L=85.4'110.0'95.2'90.0'L=3 1.4'75.2'57.1'L=39.0'L=6.0'98.3'19.4'59.4'110.0'8.6'L=22.7'110.0'86.4'38.9'48.3'110.0'87.2'29.0'58.2'110.0'88.3'19.1'69.3'110.0'87.2'8.0'77.7'1.5'75.8'11.2'110.0'87.0'66.1'36.2'26.6'L=103.0'L=28 .5 'L=43.1'9.7'110.0'70.1'L=45.5'L=36.0'L=103.0'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.7'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'98.8'L=2 8.1'15.6'L=25.0'25.0'110.0'37.6'L=16.7'16.1'L=27.5'95.8'63.9'24.8'4.8'74.1'7.3'110.0'81.4'74.3'7.1'110.0'81.4'79.7'1.7'110.0'81.4'79.9'1.5'110.0'81.4'78.4'3.0'110.0'81.4'110.4'81.4'78.6'11.9'69.7'57.0'130.1'L=45.7'33.2'L=109.0'L=27.5'L=55.1'24.6'3.4'25.6'90.0'90.0'L=7.8 '118.3'L=23.5'58.0'L=31.4 '110.0'35.3'L=97.4'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'79.9'110.0'81.6'110.0'86.8'110.0'81.6'110.0'78.8'82.1'L=12.0'L=3 6.8'3.4'L=56.3'8.4'6688884466.800TRACT ATRTR4,487 SF42.1'222143.4'64.4'487 487 139.8'PHASEHASSE 2 - 31 LOTSLOT-11SESESS001111PHASE 1 - 24 LOTSPHASE 3 - 30 LOTSPHASE 3 - 30 LOTSPHASE 4 - 19 LOTSSerrano HeightsA project in the City of Pasco, WAPreliminary plat for:May 25, 2018Date:0074.00JF Eng. Job #5220 S. Auburn PlKennewick, WA 99337(509) 551-8174 PHNwww.JFEngineering.proCIVIL ENGINEERINGPROJECT MANAGEMENTPLANNINGENGINEERING, PLLCChecked by: JEFDrawn by: KWETATEOFWASHNG T ON JOHNERICFETTER O L F DEDDREREENIGNELANOIISSEFORP C100Scale V: N/AScale H: 1"=80''C' LANECENTRAL DRIVECENTRAL CT.'D' LANEVALLEY VIEW PLACEVALLEY VIEW PLACE'A' LANE'B' LANENORTH DRIVEW. NO R T H C T.CHAPEL HILL BLVD.E. NORTH CT.EXISTING 100' EASMENT117-510-039RIVERHAWK POINTE II PRELIMINARY PLATSERRANO HEIGHTS SUBDIVISIONLOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T 9 N, R 29 E OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIANPROPERTY BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PROVIDED BY HDJ, A DIVISION OF PBS,2017.BASIS OF BEARING IS: NAD83/91 WASHINGTON STATEPLANE, SOUTH ZONE HOLDING THE COORDINATES FORPOINT 1507 PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3774, BEING ABRASS CAP IN CASE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OFSECTION 16, T9N, R29E, W.M., LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF ARGENT ROAD AND ROAD 84. THENGVD29 ELEVATION OF 390.12 AS LISTED BY CITY OF PASCO(PSI #53-16) FORTHIS MONUMENT WAS HELD.VERTICAL DATUM IS CITY OF PASCO DATUM, PSI10-33, ELEV: 357.65TAX ID # OF SUBJECT PARCEL: 117-510-036COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIALLAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION: R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALCURRENT PROPERTY USE: AGRICULTURALTOTAL PARCEL AREA:38.1 Ac, 1,659,196 SFPHASE 1: 24 LOTSPHASE 2: 31 LOTSPHASE 3: 30 LOTSPHASE 4: 19 LOTSTOTAL LOTS: 104AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10,186 SFMIN. LOT SIZE: 8,154 SF (LOT 28)LARGEST LOT SIZE: 20,571 SF (LOT 12)R/W AREA: 359,350 SFANTICIPATED TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION SPRING2019 AND COMPLETE BY 2023, DEPENDANT UPONMARKET CONDITIONS.PUBLIC STREETS, UTILITIES, AND STORMWATERPUBLIC STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITYOF PASCO STANDARD 3-2A, LOCAL ACCESSSTREETS AND CUL-DE-SAC BULB. THIS SECTIONINCLUDES CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS.CITY POTABLE WATER, IRRIGATION, ANDSANITARY SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED TO EACHLOT WITHIN THE PLAT. FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BEINSTALLED AND LOCATED PER THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY FIRE CHIEF.SANITARY SEWER EXISTS WITHIN AN EASEMENTTHROUGH THIS PROJECT AND WILL BE UTILIZEDTO SERVE THIS PROJECT.STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL BE COLLECTEDFROM PUBLIC STREETS AND DISPOSED OF,ONSITE, IN LOCALIZED SUBSURFACEINFILTRATION SYSTEMS.STREET LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITYOF PASCO STANDARDS.PROPERTY AND PLAT STATISTICSLEGENDLOT #LOT TOTAL AREARESIDENTIALRIVER...ADJACENT USEADJACENT SUBDIVISION NAME117-510-033CO TAX ID #UNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)30'30'30'30'30'30'117-510-167EXTG 10"IRRIGATIONPROP E RT Y B O U N D A R Y 117-510-038117-641-062117-641-071EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENT FCID CANALFCCIDCANALFCID CANALFCIDCCANALEXISTING 50'CANAL ROWEXISTING 20'EASEMENT(RESIDENTIAL)(RESIDENTIAL)ROAD 76EXISTING IRRIGATIONPIVOTCHIAWANA PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT117-510-037CHIAWANA HIGH SCHOOL117-590-010EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYCHAPEL HILL BLVD.30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'R55'R55'R55'40'PROPERTY BOUNDARY30'0'30'EXISTING 30'EASEMENTEXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXSTNGG 244 SAN. SEWEREXISTING 30'G330XEASEMENTEVICINITY MAP1" = 2,000'±RD 76RD 72RD 80ARGENT RD.I-182RD 84RD 68BURDEN BLVD.HILL BLVD.CHAPELLSITEEUNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)UNDEVELOPED(OFFICE)SSSSSTTTTTTTTTATTJOEREERTSIGEGRE38322ELANOISSEFORPPPPP 5/25/18Page 171 of 368 318,671 SF488,954 SF399,062 SF388,979 SF378,976 SF368,976 SF358,792 SF348,976 SF339,551 SF328,976 SF3010,144 SF4211,567 SF448,954 SF458,954 SF468,954 SF478,954 SF499,895 SF518,503 SF6411,146 SF5711,406 SF568,503 SF558,503 SF548,543 SF538,503 SF528,503 SF5011,186 SF5811,158 SF599,568 SF609,592 SF619,718 SF629,592 SF1920,570 SF189,728 SF1710,278 SF1611,869 SF1512,852 SF1413,562 SF139,346 SF,9999979 SSSSSSSSF4113,856 SF66SF4011,295 SF439,455 SF639,546 SF238,580 SF248,580 SF258,580 SF268,580 SF278,580 SF2011,280 SF288,580 SF218,580 SF2911,405 SF228,580 SF8555558L=44.4'L=2 4.9'73.0'110.0'55.8'L=37.5'13.8'L=34.4'19.5'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'17.5'119.8'127.5'L=61.0'136.9'60.2'69.0'83.7'L=91.0'120.0'L=30.6'40.0'L=31.4'58.0'L=29.4'97.6'L=45.0'L=19.9 'L=52.6'133.4'88.7'L =5 6 .8'134.4'L=48.1'163.5'L=51.6'L=41.8'L=141.2'91.6'L=51.4'91.6'L=115.4'110.0'L=9.5'L=1 4 .2'57.1'L=39.0'L=6.0'98.3'19.4'59.4'110.0'8.6'L=22.7'110.0'86.4'38.9'48.3'110.0'87.2'29.0'58.2'110.0'88.3'19.1'69.3'110.0'87.2'8.0'77.7'1.5'75.8'11.2'110.0'87.0'66.1'36.2'26.6'L=103.0'L=28 .5 'L=43.1'9.7'110.0'70.1'L=45.5'L=36.0'L=103.0'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.7'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'98.8'L=2 8.1'15.6'L=25.0'25.0'110.0'37.6'L=16.7'16.1'L=27.5'95.8'63.9'24.8'4.8'74.1'7.3'110.0'81.4'74.3'7.1'110.0'81.4'79.7'1.7'110.0'81.4'79.9'1.5'110.0'81.4'78.4'3.0'110.0'81.4'110.4'81.4'78.6'11.9'69.7'57.0'130.1'L=45.7'33.2'L=109.0'L=27.5'L=55.1'24.6'3.4'25.6'90.0'90.0'L=7.8 '118.3'L=23.5'58.0'L=31.4 '110.0'35.3'L=97.4'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'79.9'110.0'81.6'110.0'86.8'110.0'81.6'110.0'78.8'82.1'L=12.0'L=3 6.8'3.4'L=56.3'8.4'898,264 SF908,015 SF9417,038 SF76.3'919,479 SF9210,542 SF939,644 SF869,748 SF878,231 SF979,612 SF10813,829 SF10713,304 SF10610,968 SF1059,603 SF1048,595 SF1038,154 SF10210,014 SF10111,390 SF10011,174 SF9910,243 SF9810,145 SF9513,632 SF968,833 SF668,888 SF788,504 SF718,888 SF708,888 SF698,888 SF688,888 SF678,888 SF658,888 SF728,504 SF738,504 SF748,504 SF758,504 SF768,504 SF778,504 SF110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'8310,691 SF799,580 SF808,543 SF819,392 SF827,306 SF859,940 SF848,621 SF107.1'103.7'.28,691 SF33.3'79.0'79.0' 38.7'L=45.3'L=88.8'110.0'L=69.2'L=35.4'38.7' 79.0' 79.0'128,691 SF118,691 SF108,691 SF98,691 SF88,691 SF78,691 SF68,691 SF58,691 SF48,691 SF38,691 SF18,691 SF33.3'L=49 .8'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=48.6'18.6'L6'6'=3233.9'9970.4'L27.4'15.8'LL==2L=40.5'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=711.88'L=71.8'L=41.5'110.0'110.0'LL==5599..55 ''110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'10925,977 SF2.1'22222222222340.6'58.7'L=54.9'50.7'7550555550500000000050000000000500366.1'3333333331'''1140.5'L=2 922 .9'9970.2'L=32.9'59.3'91.3'L=30.1'L=16.8LL'88LLL116.6'L=50.1'141.7'45.8'92.5'104.2'L=35 .7 '115.4'L=36.2'107.1'7.1'7.1'114.2'116.8'L=35.3'79.7'5.3'.364.4'L=44.3'108.4'L=32.9'33.0'''L=16.8 'L88=88 33.5'L=3 7 .9 'L=41.4'L=36.0'L=50.6'100.5'L=16.8 '36.0'L=31.4'3378.1'96.7'39.1'L=25.6'8.8'8LL23.7'73.5'20.9'88L=15.12222L ==11=LL==1 LL9 .9'99L==688.1'147.0'120.2'80.3'20.4'23.4'145.5'53.0'45.3'120.1'72.6'10.7'108810,444 SF120.8'52.5'52.5'133.4'133.4'L=42.4'L=39.7'112.1'L=17.33'L=L1LL6LL.8=='8836.2'L=3133.4'44108.4'4488666688222222222139.9'L=17.88'65.3'117.3'L=36.8'47.5'L=49.5'L=44.1'33.7'138.2'91.7'LL..8888=8825.6'74.0'133.9'31.4'L=49.8'4.7'4125.7'74.5'74.0'40.1'L=43.50.7'7''125.3'FF2.6'6L=48.1'2.1'.119.7'FFL=22.44'37.8'74.0'74.0'142.5'FF49.1'L''=36.1'65.8'L=8..2'161.5'FFL=39.5'38.3'L=47.3'162.9'L=46.4'38.2'L55=5544.8'33L''==11.5'LL=21.9'36.0'143.2'68.1'75.4'127.2'L=17.66'59.5'27.5'L=32.28.9'22''L8.98.=9914.88'130.0'28.1'L''=39.0'L11=4400..8888.8833'''LL11=44==4444001880888933.9 'L=62.1'109.8'86.8'L=49.7'102.4'144.6'63.7'110.0'57.2'L=16.8'L1166=88388''3.6'L=85.4'70.4'14.2'1L=65.9'26.2'L.2.=2229.9 '54.7'10.7'66.6'77.3'7.2'770.1'77.3'110.0'80.8'110.0'80.8'110.0'80.8'73.6'110.0'80.8'3.7'777.1'110.0'0.2'.77.3'110.0'2.4'2..74.9'77.3'109.9'L=12.4'74.1'82.8'L=33.3'76.0'L=3133.4'4464.3'L 22.=1122222222 ===.7 LL'0.2'.2.L=170011222'2229.7'L=70.7'8.9'L33=45.0'PHASE 3 - 49 LOTSAS9LO399SSSS7111PHASE 1 - 23 LOTSPHASE 3 - 49 LOTSPHASE 2 - 37 LOTSPHASE 2 - 37 LOTSR55'55559PHASE 1 - 23 LOTSPHASE 3 - 49 LOTSOTPHHASSerrano HeightsA project in the City of Pasco, WAPreliminary plat for:July 25, 2018Date:0074.00JF Eng. Job #5220 S. Auburn PlKennewick, WA 99337(509) 551-8174 PHNwww.JFEngineering.proCIVIL ENGINEERINGPROJECT MANAGEMENTPLANNINGENGINEERING, PLLCChecked by: JEFDrawn by: KWETATEOFWASHNG T ON JOHNERICFETTER O L F DEDDREENIGNELANOIISSEFORP C100Scale V: N/AScale H: 1"=80'Know what'sR'C' LANECENTRAL CT.'D' LANEMASSEY DRIVEVALLEY VIEW PLACE'A' LANE'B' LANENORTH DRIVEW. NO R T H C T.CHAPEL HILL BLVD.E. NORTH CT.EXISTING 100' EASMENT117-510-039RIVERHAWK POINTE II PRELIMINARY PLATSERRANO HEIGHTS SUBDIVISIONLOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T 9 N, R 29 E OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIANPROPERTY BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PROVIDED BY HDJ, A DIVISION OF PBS,2017.BASIS OF BEARING IS: NAD83/91 WASHINGTON STATEPLANE, SOUTH ZONE HOLDING THE COORDINATES FORPOINT 1507 PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3774, BEING ABRASS CAP IN CASE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OFSECTION 16, T9N, R29E, W.M., LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF ARGENT ROAD AND ROAD 84. THENGVD29 ELEVATION OF 390.12 AS LISTED BY CITY OF PASCO(PSI #53-16) FORTHIS MONUMENT WAS HELD.VERTICAL DATUM IS CITY OF PASCO DATUM, PSI10-33, ELEV: 357.65TAX ID # OF SUBJECT PARCEL: 117-510-036COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIALLAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION: R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALCURRENT PROPERTY USE: AGRICULTURALTOTAL PARCEL AREA:38.1 Ac, 1,659,196 SFPHASE 1: 23 LOTSPHASE 2: 37 LOTSPHASE 3: 49 LOTSTOTAL LOTS: 109AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 9,810 SFMIN. LOT SIZE: 7,306 SF (LOT 82)LARGEST LOT SIZE: 25,977 SF (LOT 109)R/W AREA: 346,375 SFANTICIPATED TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION SPRING2019 AND COMPLETE BY 2023, DEPENDANT UPONMARKET CONDITIONS.PUBLIC STREETS, UTILITIES, AND STORMWATERPUBLIC STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITYOF PASCO STANDARD 3-2A, LOCAL ACCESSSTREETS AND CUL-DE-SAC BULB. THIS SECTIONINCLUDES CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS.CITY POTABLE WATER, IRRIGATION, ANDSANITARY SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED TO EACHLOT WITHIN THE PLAT. FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BEINSTALLED AND LOCATED PER THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY FIRE CHIEF.SANITARY SEWER EXISTS WITHIN AN EASEMENTTHROUGH THIS PROJECT AND WILL BE UTILIZEDTO SERVE THIS PROJECT.STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL BE COLLECTEDFROM PUBLIC STREETS AND DISPOSED OF,ONSITE, IN LOCALIZED SUBSURFACEINFILTRATION SYSTEMS.STREET LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITYOF PASCO STANDARDS.PROPERTY AND PLAT STATISTICSLEGENDLOT #LOT TOTAL AREARESIDENTIALRIVER...ADJACENT USEADJACENT SUBDIVISION NAME117-510-033CO TAX ID #UNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)30'30'30'30'117-510-167EXTG 10"IRRIGATIONPROP E RT Y B O U N D A R Y 117-510-038117-641-062117-641-071EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENT FCID CANALFCID CANALEXISTING 50'CANAL ROWEXISTING 20'EASEMENT(RESIDENTIAL)(RESIDENTIAL)ROAD 76EXISTING IRRIGATIONPIVOTCHIAWANA PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT117-510-037CHIAWANA HIGH SCHOOL117-590-010EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYCHAPEL HILL BLVD.30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'110.0110 0110 0110 030'66R55'R55'R55'40'PROPERTY BOUNDARYAAAAAAAAAARARRRRRRRYRYRYYYYYYYY30'0'0000000030'EXISTING 30'EASEMENTEXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 30'G330GEASEMENTVICINITY MAP1" = 2,000'±RD 76RD 72RD 80ARGENT RD.I-182RD 84RD 68BURDEN BLVD.HILL BLVD.CHAPELLSITEEUNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)UNDEVELOPED(OFFICE)40'UTILESMT7/25/18SSSSSSSTTTTTTJOEREERTSIGEGRE38322NELANOISSEFORPPPPPPPPPP Page 172 of 368 Looking NorthPage 173 of 368 Looking EastPage 174 of 368 Looking SouthPage 175 of 368 Looking WestPage 176 of 368 Chiawana HS to the Southwest of SitePage 177 of 368 Chapel Hill Boulevard Connect Point to NortheastPage 178 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2018-007 HEARING DATE: 7/19/2018 ACTION DATE: 9/20/2018 APPLICANT: RP Development 6159 W Deschutes Ave Suite 509 Kennewick WA 99336 BACKGROUND REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Serrano Heights, (104-Lot Single-Family Subdivision). 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 4 of Record Survey #1847849 General Location: South of Future Chapel Hill Blvd between Roads 70 & 76 Property Size: 38.1 Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 109 single-family lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 7,306 ft² to 25,977 ft² Average Lot Square Footage: 9,810 ft² 2. ACCESS: The property is proposed to have access from Chapel Hill Boulevard, Road 76, and Massey Drive. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal sewer service is located in future Massey Drive extension along the southern portion of the site. Water service will be located primarily in Massey Drive and Chapel Hill Boulevard. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (Low-Density Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 Vacant; DNR Lease Property EAST: C-1; O; R-1 Vacant & Single-Family SOUTH: R-S-1 Vacant; Chiawana Place Subdivision WEST R-1 Vacant; Riverhawk Pointe II Subdivision 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for low-density residential development. According to the Comprehensive Plan, low-density residential development means 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future land use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II, page 17) encourages development of lands designated for low-density residential uses when or where sewer is available; the location is suitable for home sites and there is a market demand for new home sites. Policy H-1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership, and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU-2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. Page 179 of 368 2 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. ANALYSIS The project site is located south and west of property held in trust by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), who expects to lease their land to commercial developers. Also to the east is the Valley View Addition, which is located in a County island and is built out with single-family homes. The property to the south has been preliminarily platted as the Chiawana Place subdivision and is zoned at a lower density (R-S-1; 10,000 square foot minimum lot size) as a transition between the R-1 on site and the lower density (RS-20) county areas to the south. Property directly to the west will be developed with future phases of the Riverhawk Pointe II subdivision, and further west along Massey Drive will be the Pasco School District Elementary School #16. The site was part of the Road 68 DNR property which sold off a few years ago. The applicant is seeking preliminary plat approval in preparation for the development of a single-family subdivision. The site was initially designated for low-density residential development under the 1982 Comprehensive Plan and again under the 1995 Plan and the updated Plan of 2008. The property is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). The proposed plat will provide additional lots within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) for single-family homes consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The old DNR site is one of the few large remaining areas within the UGA to be developed. The proposed plat can be considered an infill development on property that was passed over during the time most of the I-182 Corridor was developed. The proposed plat was originally part of a larger parcel that extended easterly from Road 84 to the west boundary of Valley View Addition. Improvement of portions of Chapel Hill Boulevard to the north will be the responsibility of the developer of the proposed plat along with improvements for Road 76 and Valley View Place. Road 76 will become a collector arterial street that will connect south of the irrigation canal to Argent Road. As such the developer will be responsible for developing a portion of the canal crossing for Road 76. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 109 residential lots. The lots vary in size from 7,306 to 25,977 square feet. The average lot size is 9,810 square feet. The proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the R-1 zoning on the site and the R-S-1 zoning to the south. The minimum lot size for the R-1 zone is 7,200 square feet. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets, which will be dedicated. The east half of Road 76 will be finished with this subdivision to match the Page 180 of 368 3 improvements in the future Riverhawk Pointe II subdivision. The developers of Riverhawk Pointe II will build the west side of the street. Improvements with this plat could also include the easterly extension of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68. With Road 76 extending south to Argent Road the developer will need to participate in the construction of the canal crossing. UTILITIES: Municipal water service will need to be extended to the site from Road 84, Road 68, future Chapel Hill Boulevard, and/or future Chiawana Heights. All utility lines will be extended through the plat and must be guided by the Comprehensive Water, Sewer and Irrigation Plans. A sewer trunk line is located along the south portion of the site about 150 feet north of the FCID canal. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not diminish the buildable area of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of less than 300 feet on residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets. The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street. STREET NAMES: The proposed street names will be approved by Staff and added prior to final plat approval. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines as part of the infrastructure improvements. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact:" Prevent Overcrowding: Density requirements of the R-1 zone are designed to address overcrowding concerns. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property in question be developed with 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Plat Page 181 of 368 4 has a density of approximately 2.9 units per acre. No more than 40 percent of each lot is permitted to be covered with structures per the R-1 standards. Parks Opens Space/Schools: There are no City parks in the immediate vicinity, however; the School District has express a desire to work with the City on the development of a park on the school site west of Road 80. City parks have been co-located with McGee, Franklin, McClintock, Maya Angelo and Whitter schools. A park impact fee will be assessed at the time permits are issued for each house in the subdivision to help cover the cost of the future park. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new dwelling unit at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The Plat is laid out for single- family development as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density permitted under the Comprehensive Plan is 5 dwelling units per acre. The developer is proposing a density of approximately 2.9 units per acre. The proposed development will include improvements to both Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to current City standards and to the standards of the American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of all intersection will be installed with the construction of the road improvements and the sidewalks along Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76 will be installed with the infrastructure improvements. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the Plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This Preliminary Plat contains 109 residential building lots, providing an opportunity for the construction of 109 new dwelling units in Pasco. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitations, building height restrictions and building setbacks will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The streets through and adjoining the Plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by Road 76, Chapel Hill Boulevard, and Massey Drive. The Preliminary Plat was submitted to the Page 182 of 368 5 Transit Authority for review (The discussion under “Safe Travel” above applies to this section also). At this time there is no guarantee that Chapel Hill will connect to Roads 68 or 84, thus limiting access to the Plat. Development of Chapel Hill Boulevard all the way through from Road 68 to Road 84 via the LID process between all property owners along said route should be a condition of Plat approval. The LID has been formed by city Council action; however there is a 30-day protest period which expires on September 19, 2018. Valley View Place is currently a dead-end road located in a Franklin County island off of Road 68 and was aligned with the future extension of Massey Drive. During most hours of the day and particularly at rush hour it is very difficult to make left turns in or out of the street, and doing so can be dangerous. As well, the Valley View Place intersection is located close to two signaled intersections on Road 68, namely Chapel Hill Boulevard and Argent Road. Adding more ingress/egress traffic at this location would likely snarl traffic at that location, necessitating installation of a traffic signal. Adding another signaled intersection this close to the two existing signals may also compound traffic issues along Road 68. Applicant has adjusted their plat as per Staff recommendation so that Massey Drive has been re-routed north to connect to future Chapel Hill Boulevard to avoid a direct connection to Valley View Place. A traffic analysis is needed to address the above issues, specifically how and where plat access should occur, and what improvements should be required at Argent Road, Chapel Hill Boulevard, Roads 68 and 84, at the very least. Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates the Plat site for low-density residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings:  The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary.  The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within the Urban Growth Boundaries.  The site is relatively flat with undulations and slopes toward the south.  The site is currently vacant.  The site is not considered a critical area, a mineral resource area or a wetland.  The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for low-density residential development.  Low-density residential development is described in the Comprehensive Plan as two to five dwelling units per acre. Page 183 of 368 6  The site is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential).  The developer is proposing approximately 2.9 dwelling units per acre.  The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the advancement of programs that promote home ownership and development of a variety of residential densities and housing types.  The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the interconnection of neighborhood streets to provide for the disbursement of traffic.  The interconnection of neighborhood streets is necessary for utility connections (looping) and the provision of emergency services.  Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 995 vehicle trips per day.  The current traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the I-182 Corridor when warranted.  The current park impact fee is $1,420 per dwelling unit. The fee can be reduced by 58 percent if a developer dedicates a five acre park site to the City. The dedication of a fully constructed park reduces the fee by 93 percent.  RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved.  The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012.  Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools.  Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped-accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses, except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements.  Water lines and fire hydrants are required to be looped.  Per PMC 12.36.050 the developer must extend all utilities to and through the subject parcel. Page 184 of 368 7  All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum.  All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans.  Storm water runoff and infiltration calculations must comply with the Storm Water Management Manual for Easter Washington, they must be provided for review and approval. Storm water calculations must be prepared, stamped, signed and dated by a currently licensed Professional Engineer registered in the State of Washington.  The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160.  The developer is responsible for all costs associated with construction, inspection, and plan review service expenses incurred by the City Engineering Office.  The developer is responsible for installing irrigation lines, which shall be installed per City of Pasco Standard Detail 3-1. Irrigation mains shall be required along Chapel Hill Boulevard, Road 76, and all internal streets.  The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner that does not injure, annoy, or endanger the comfort and repose of other property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including houses.  Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval.  The final plat will contain 10-foot utility easements parallel to all streets. Additional easement will be provided as needed by utility providers.  Road 76 will become a collector arterial street connecting Chapel Hill Boulevard with Argent Road. This connection will require a crossing over the FCID canal. The developer will be responsible for a portion (one quarter) of the canal crossing costs and dedication of appropriate right- of-way. Page 185 of 368 8  The Comprehensive Water Plan calls for a 12 inch line running north and south in Road 76 with a 12 inch connection west to Road 84.  The Irrigation Master Plan calls for a 12 inch line running north and south in Road 80.  To properly serve the proposed subdivision one or more pressure reducing valves may be needed. The design and installation of which is typically the responsibility of the developer. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the PUD, the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable, franklin County Irrigation District and Ben-Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. The proposed plat has the potential to be partially or wholly “landlocked” if adequate provision for connections to Argent Road, Roads 68 and 84 and future Chapel Hill Boulevard. The approval conditions need to provide for a solution to this potential. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. City parks are located in the subdivisions to the west and southwest of the site. All new developments participate in establishing parks through the payment of park fees at the time of permitting. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed Plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for the looping of utilities and interconnectivity of streets as supported in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision will provide arterial street Page 186 of 368 9 improvements along Chapel Hill Boulevard and connect to Argent Road via Road 76. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low-density residential development. Low-density residential development is described as 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Plan encourages the promotion of a variety of residential densities and suggests the community should support the advancement of programs encouraging home ownership. The Transportation Element of the Plan suggests major streets should be beautified with trees and landscaping. The Plan also encourages the interconnection of local streets for inter-neighborhood travel for public safety as well as providing for traffic disbursement. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e., school impact fees are paid). (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. The proposed Plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will ensure the public use and interest are served. TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). Page 187 of 368 10 3. The developer shall install common "Estate" type fence/wall six-feet in height along Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76 as a part of the infrastructure improvements associated with the plat. The fence/wall must be constructed of masonry block. A fencing detail must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. An approved vision triangle at the intersection of streets will be required. Following construction of the masonry fence/wall the City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep of the fence/wall. These fencing requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the final plat(s). A concrete mow strip shall be installed under any common fence as directed by the City Parks Division and shall be approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. Alternative designs may be considered and accepted by the Director of Community & Economic Development. 4. Excess right-of-way along Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard must be landscaped. Said landscaping shall include irrigation, turf, and trees. Trees shall be planted at 50 foot intervals. The species of the trees will be determined by the Parks Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. Water usage for City right-of-way landscaping shall come from a source approved by the City of Pasco with the connection and meter fees paid for by the developer. 5. The sidewalks on Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard shall be offset to accommodate the planting strip required in Number 4 above. 6. The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $475 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. The City shall not accept maintenance responsibility for the landscaping abutting said streets until such time as all fees are collected for each phase that abut said streets. 7. Lots abutting Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard shall not have direct access to said streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of deed restrictions and/or statements on the face of the final plat(s). 8. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 9. The owner/developer is responsible for one quarter of the cost of installing the Road 76 canal crossing, but based upon the need to connect to Argent Road, may be required to build the crossing at the time of the development with the expectation of reimbursement through a future latecomer’s agreement. This contribution shall be in the form a cash deposit to the City in an amount determined by the City Engineer to ensure the completion of the canal crossing. Said deposit must be Page 188 of 368 11 accompanied by a signed development agreement ensuring the developer's full proportionate share of the crossing is covered in the event the initial deposit falls short of the final construction costs. The owner/ developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of an LID to cover the cost of the share of the canal crossing. Said non-protest agreement may also include the development's share of the required Road 76 improvements. The non-protest agreement shall be recorded, run with the property and be binding upon successors in the property ownership and must be executed within 10 days of Preliminary Plat approval by City Council. The formation and approval of an LID for these improvements shall be deemed sufficient for the fulfilment of this condition. 10. The owner/developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of an LID for the construction of Chapel Hill Boulevard and/or Road 76. The non-protest agreement shall be recorded, run with the property and be binding upon successors in the property ownership and must be executed within 10 days of Preliminary Plat approval by City Council. The formation, approval of and participation in an LID for these improvements shall be deemed sufficient for the fulfilment of the Chapel Hill Boulevard portion of this condition 11. The developer shall prepare a traffic study in accordance with standard practices—the scope and results of which must be approved by the City. The study must consider impacts both with and without a Chapel Hill Boulevard connection to Road 68, and with and without a Valley view connection to Road 68. The cumulative impacts of the proposed subdivision must be considered on the capacity of the intersections of Road 76 and Argent Road, Massey Drive and Road 68, Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 68, and Road 68 and Argent at minimum. The Traffic study must recommend necessary improvements to address capacity issues and the efficient diffusion of traffic through the neighborhood. These recommendations may include participation in the installation of a traffic signal at Argent/Road 76; construction of a roundabout at Road 76 and Chapel Hill, construction of a canal crossing as identified in condition #9 above, and any other mitigation efforts outlined by the results of said traffic study. The results and recommendations of the traffic study—once approved by the City—shall become conditions upon the preliminary plat and must be implemented prior to final plat approval. The formation, approval of and participation in an LID for Chapel Hill Boulevard shall be deemed sufficient for the fulfilment of this condition. 12. The developer shall provide the necessary right-of-way at the southeast corner of Road 76 and Chapel Hill Boulevard for a roundabout at said intersection. Page 189 of 368 12 13. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat." RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. MOTION: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Serrano Heights, with conditions as listed in the September 20, 2018 staff report. Page 190 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 191 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetPage 192 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetNew SFResidentialDevelopmentProposedElementarySchoolMH ParkChiawanaHighSchoolVacant--Platted forSF ResidentialDevelopmentVacant--Platted for SFResidentialDevelopmentVacantCommercialMulti-FamilySFDUsSFDUs(County)SFDUsSFDUs (County)SFDUsVac.Vac.FSCommercialPage 193 of 368 ZoningMapItem: Serrano Heights Preliminary PlatApplicant: RP DevelopmentFile #: PP 2018-007SITE0 300 600 900 1200FeetR-1RPC-1C-1R-4R-1RS-20(County)RS-12RS-20 (County)RS-20C-1C-1"O"RS-20RS-1R-3R-3Page 194 of 368 210,025 SF510,025 SF410,025 SF310,025 SF110,025 SF838,671 SF808,954 SF919,062 SF908,979 SF898,976 SF888,976 SF878,792 SF868,976 SF859,551 SF848,976 SF8210,144 SF7411,567 SF768,954 SF778,954 SF788,954 SF798,954 SF819,895 SF668,503 SF6411,146 SF7211,406 SF718,503 SF708,503 SF698,543 SF688,503 SF678,503 SF6511,186 SF5811,158 SF599,568 SF609,592 SF619,718 SF629,592 SF1009,623 SF1049,623 SF1039,623 SF1029,623 SF1019,623 SF999,623 SF9510,778 SF989,800 SF979,800 SF969,800 SF949,925 SF9311,470 SF5710,392 SF5210,117 SF399,686 SF5510,315 SF5610,477 SF5410,117 SF539,020 SF4410,158 SF4210,873 SF419,001 SF409,947 SF389,999 SF4310,531 SF4510,165 SF5011,086 SF5111,086 SF4713,080 SF4810,541 SF4911,182 SF4610,098 SF1220,570 SF119,728 SF1010,278 SF911,869 SF812,852 SF713,562 SF69,346 SF3716,568 SF7313,856 SF9211,295 SF759,455 SF639,546 SF3610,441 SF2313,829 SF2910,014 SF3011,390 SF3116,994 SF3210,479 SF338,362 SF348,428 SF359,448 SF288,154 SF278,595 SF269,603 SF2510,968 SF2413,304 SF168,580 SF178,580 SF188,580 SF198,580 SF208,580 SF1311,280 SF218,580 SF148,580 SF2211,405 SF158,580 SFL=44.4'L=2 4.9'73.0'110.0'55.8'L=37.5'13.8'L=34.4'19.5'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'17.5'119.8'127.5'L=61.0'136.9'60.2'69.0'83.7'L=91.0'120.0'L=30.6'40.0'L=31.4'58.0'L=29.4'97.6'L=45.0'L=19.9 'L=52.6'133.4'88.7'L =5 6 .8'134.4'L=48.1'163.5'L=51.6'L=41.8'L=141.2'91.6'L=51.4'L=59.5 'L=115.4'110.0'L=9.5'L=1 4 .2'L=102.4'110.0'L=79.9'L=31.7 '62.9'110.0'62.9'L=24.7 '91.1'110.0'91.1'76.0'L=13.8'110.0'L=16 .6'76.0'L=63.2'L=29.7'70.2'L=33.0'L=82.2'110.0'L=78.3'L=33.0'70.2'L=29.7'L=59.9'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=79.5'110.0'L=95.4'L=40.8'42.6'110.0'42.6'L=49.0'87.5'110.0'87.5'86.6'L=54.4'L=16.8'29.4'106.2'129.1'L=42.8'124.1'29.6'106.0'L =4 6.4'142.9'137.7'L=36.3'111.4'24.4'16.2'102.8'L=45.4'144.2'82.4'111.7'L=32.9'33.0'L=16.8 'L=39.9'105.0'102.8'L=35.8'L=16.8'36.2'L=31.4'L=49.0'147.7'L=40 .6 '134.3'101.4'L=54.6'79.0'53.0'27.2'97.5'L=51.9'16.7'78.0'102.3'103.8'L=33.4'7.0'69.4'110.5'56.1'L=16.8 '110.5'91.9'8.1'84.0'110.5'91.9'91.9'90.5'L=31.4'76.1'5.0'91.0'L=31.4'64.3'L=15.1'23.4'111.0'74.2'113.7'17.1'L=48.3'1.8'125.5'83.2'123.6'77.3'96.7'74.9'83.1'L=3.8'L=15.3'135.7'L=15.6'L=0.5'38.6'L=54.9'58.7'134.1'102.2'134.1'61.3'127.7'74.0'74.0'127.7'L=17.0'57.0'43.3'L=14.5'128.4'59.0'L=15.1'L=42.1'14.5'133.1'74.0'75.9'150.1'L=69.2'5.9'37.1'L=57.9'38.2'L=4.8'161.5'L=8.2'L=39.5'38.3'142.5'65.8'49.1'L=36.1'119.7'74.0'L=22.4'37.8'125.3'74.0'2.6'L=48.1'2.1'125.7'40.1'L=43.5'0.7'74.5'133.9'74.0'31.4'L=49.8'4.7'138.2'74.0'91.7'L=25.6'139.9'L=44.1'33.7'L=17.8'65.3'117.3'L=36.8'47.5'L=49.5'L=31.4'90.0'92.7'110.0'72.8'2.6'79.4'110.0'82.0'15.9'83.3'L=65.9'26.2'L=29.9 '69.3'110.0'70.1'L=16.8'L=33.6'L=85.4'110.0'95.2'90.0'L=3 1.4'75.2'57.1'L=39.0'L=6.0'98.3'19.4'59.4'110.0'8.6'L=22.7'110.0'86.4'38.9'48.3'110.0'87.2'29.0'58.2'110.0'88.3'19.1'69.3'110.0'87.2'8.0'77.7'1.5'75.8'11.2'110.0'87.0'66.1'36.2'26.6'L=103.0'L=28 .5 'L=43.1'9.7'110.0'70.1'L=45.5'L=36.0'L=103.0'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.7'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'98.8'L=2 8.1'15.6'L=25.0'25.0'110.0'37.6'L=16.7'16.1'L=27.5'95.8'63.9'24.8'4.8'74.1'7.3'110.0'81.4'74.3'7.1'110.0'81.4'79.7'1.7'110.0'81.4'79.9'1.5'110.0'81.4'78.4'3.0'110.0'81.4'110.4'81.4'78.6'11.9'69.7'57.0'130.1'L=45.7'33.2'L=109.0'L=27.5'L=55.1'24.6'3.4'25.6'90.0'90.0'L=7.8 '118.3'L=23.5'58.0'L=31.4 '110.0'35.3'L=97.4'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'79.9'110.0'81.6'110.0'86.8'110.0'81.6'110.0'78.8'82.1'L=12.0'L=3 6.8'3.4'L=56.3'8.4'6688884466.800TRACT ATRTR4,487 SF42.1'222143.4'64.4'487 487 139.8'PHASEHASSE 2 - 31 LOTSLOT-11SESESS001111PHASE 1 - 24 LOTSPHASE 3 - 30 LOTSPHASE 3 - 30 LOTSPHASE 4 - 19 LOTSSerrano HeightsA project in the City of Pasco, WAPreliminary plat for:May 25, 2018Date:0074.00JF Eng. Job #5220 S. Auburn PlKennewick, WA 99337(509) 551-8174 PHNwww.JFEngineering.proCIVIL ENGINEERINGPROJECT MANAGEMENTPLANNINGENGINEERING, PLLCChecked by: JEFDrawn by: KWETATEOFWASHNG T ON JOHNERICFETTER O L F DEDDREREENIGNELANOIISSEFORP C100Scale V: N/AScale H: 1"=80''C' LANECENTRAL DRIVECENTRAL CT.'D' LANEVALLEY VIEW PLACEVALLEY VIEW PLACE'A' LANE'B' LANENORTH DRIVEW. NO R T H C T.CHAPEL HILL BLVD.E. NORTH CT.EXISTING 100' EASMENT117-510-039RIVERHAWK POINTE II PRELIMINARY PLATSERRANO HEIGHTS SUBDIVISIONLOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T 9 N, R 29 E OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIANPROPERTY BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PROVIDED BY HDJ, A DIVISION OF PBS,2017.BASIS OF BEARING IS: NAD83/91 WASHINGTON STATEPLANE, SOUTH ZONE HOLDING THE COORDINATES FORPOINT 1507 PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3774, BEING ABRASS CAP IN CASE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OFSECTION 16, T9N, R29E, W.M., LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF ARGENT ROAD AND ROAD 84. THENGVD29 ELEVATION OF 390.12 AS LISTED BY CITY OF PASCO(PSI #53-16) FORTHIS MONUMENT WAS HELD.VERTICAL DATUM IS CITY OF PASCO DATUM, PSI10-33, ELEV: 357.65TAX ID # OF SUBJECT PARCEL: 117-510-036COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIALLAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION: R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALCURRENT PROPERTY USE: AGRICULTURALTOTAL PARCEL AREA:38.1 Ac, 1,659,196 SFPHASE 1: 24 LOTSPHASE 2: 31 LOTSPHASE 3: 30 LOTSPHASE 4: 19 LOTSTOTAL LOTS: 104AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 10,186 SFMIN. LOT SIZE: 8,154 SF (LOT 28)LARGEST LOT SIZE: 20,571 SF (LOT 12)R/W AREA: 359,350 SFANTICIPATED TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION SPRING2019 AND COMPLETE BY 2023, DEPENDANT UPONMARKET CONDITIONS.PUBLIC STREETS, UTILITIES, AND STORMWATERPUBLIC STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITYOF PASCO STANDARD 3-2A, LOCAL ACCESSSTREETS AND CUL-DE-SAC BULB. THIS SECTIONINCLUDES CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS.CITY POTABLE WATER, IRRIGATION, ANDSANITARY SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED TO EACHLOT WITHIN THE PLAT. FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BEINSTALLED AND LOCATED PER THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY FIRE CHIEF.SANITARY SEWER EXISTS WITHIN AN EASEMENTTHROUGH THIS PROJECT AND WILL BE UTILIZEDTO SERVE THIS PROJECT.STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL BE COLLECTEDFROM PUBLIC STREETS AND DISPOSED OF,ONSITE, IN LOCALIZED SUBSURFACEINFILTRATION SYSTEMS.STREET LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITYOF PASCO STANDARDS.PROPERTY AND PLAT STATISTICSLEGENDLOT #LOT TOTAL AREARESIDENTIALRIVER...ADJACENT USEADJACENT SUBDIVISION NAME117-510-033CO TAX ID #UNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)30'30'30'30'30'30'117-510-167EXTG 10"IRRIGATIONPROP E RT Y B O U N D A R Y 117-510-038117-641-062117-641-071EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENT FCID CANALFCCIDCANALFCID CANALFCIDCCANALEXISTING 50'CANAL ROWEXISTING 20'EASEMENT(RESIDENTIAL)(RESIDENTIAL)ROAD 76EXISTING IRRIGATIONPIVOTCHIAWANA PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT117-510-037CHIAWANA HIGH SCHOOL117-590-010EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYCHAPEL HILL BLVD.30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'R55'R55'R55'40'PROPERTY BOUNDARY30'0'30'EXISTING 30'EASEMENTEXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXSTNGG 244 SAN. SEWEREXISTING 30'G330XEASEMENTEVICINITY MAP1" = 2,000'±RD 76RD 72RD 80ARGENT RD.I-182RD 84RD 68BURDEN BLVD.HILL BLVD.CHAPELLSITEEUNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)UNDEVELOPED(OFFICE)SSSSSTTTTTTTTTATTJOEREERTSIGEGRE38322ELANOISSEFORPPPPP 5/25/18Page 195 of 368 318,671 SF488,954 SF399,062 SF388,979 SF378,976 SF368,976 SF358,792 SF348,976 SF339,551 SF328,976 SF3010,144 SF4211,567 SF448,954 SF458,954 SF468,954 SF478,954 SF499,895 SF518,503 SF6411,146 SF5711,406 SF568,503 SF558,503 SF548,543 SF538,503 SF528,503 SF5011,186 SF5811,158 SF599,568 SF609,592 SF619,718 SF629,592 SF1920,570 SF189,728 SF1710,278 SF1611,869 SF1512,852 SF1413,562 SF139,346 SF,9999979 SSSSSSSSF4113,856 SF66SF4011,295 SF439,455 SF639,546 SF238,580 SF248,580 SF258,580 SF268,580 SF278,580 SF2011,280 SF288,580 SF218,580 SF2911,405 SF228,580 SF8555558L=44.4'L=2 4.9'73.0'110.0'55.8'L=37.5'13.8'L=34.4'19.5'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'78.0'78.0'110.0'17.5'119.8'127.5'L=61.0'136.9'60.2'69.0'83.7'L=91.0'120.0'L=30.6'40.0'L=31.4'58.0'L=29.4'97.6'L=45.0'L=19.9 'L=52.6'133.4'88.7'L =5 6 .8'134.4'L=48.1'163.5'L=51.6'L=41.8'L=141.2'91.6'L=51.4'91.6'L=115.4'110.0'L=9.5'L=1 4 .2'57.1'L=39.0'L=6.0'98.3'19.4'59.4'110.0'8.6'L=22.7'110.0'86.4'38.9'48.3'110.0'87.2'29.0'58.2'110.0'88.3'19.1'69.3'110.0'87.2'8.0'77.7'1.5'75.8'11.2'110.0'87.0'66.1'36.2'26.6'L=103.0'L=28 .5 'L=43.1'9.7'110.0'70.1'L=45.5'L=36.0'L=103.0'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.7'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'110.0'77.3'98.8'L=2 8.1'15.6'L=25.0'25.0'110.0'37.6'L=16.7'16.1'L=27.5'95.8'63.9'24.8'4.8'74.1'7.3'110.0'81.4'74.3'7.1'110.0'81.4'79.7'1.7'110.0'81.4'79.9'1.5'110.0'81.4'78.4'3.0'110.0'81.4'110.4'81.4'78.6'11.9'69.7'57.0'130.1'L=45.7'33.2'L=109.0'L=27.5'L=55.1'24.6'3.4'25.6'90.0'90.0'L=7.8 '118.3'L=23.5'58.0'L=31.4 '110.0'35.3'L=97.4'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'81.6'110.0'79.9'110.0'81.6'110.0'86.8'110.0'81.6'110.0'78.8'82.1'L=12.0'L=3 6.8'3.4'L=56.3'8.4'898,264 SF908,015 SF9417,038 SF76.3'919,479 SF9210,542 SF939,644 SF869,748 SF878,231 SF979,612 SF10813,829 SF10713,304 SF10610,968 SF1059,603 SF1048,595 SF1038,154 SF10210,014 SF10111,390 SF10011,174 SF9910,243 SF9810,145 SF9513,632 SF968,833 SF668,888 SF788,504 SF718,888 SF708,888 SF698,888 SF688,888 SF678,888 SF658,888 SF728,504 SF738,504 SF748,504 SF758,504 SF768,504 SF778,504 SF110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'8310,691 SF799,580 SF808,543 SF819,392 SF827,306 SF859,940 SF848,621 SF107.1'103.7'.28,691 SF33.3'79.0'79.0' 38.7'L=45.3'L=88.8'110.0'L=69.2'L=35.4'38.7' 79.0' 79.0'128,691 SF118,691 SF108,691 SF98,691 SF88,691 SF78,691 SF68,691 SF58,691 SF48,691 SF38,691 SF18,691 SF33.3'L=49 .8'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=86.2'L=48.6'18.6'L6'6'=3233.9'9970.4'L27.4'15.8'LL==2L=40.5'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=71.8'L=711.88'L=71.8'L=41.5'110.0'110.0'LL==5599..55 ''110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'110.0'10925,977 SF2.1'22222222222340.6'58.7'L=54.9'50.7'7550555550500000000050000000000500366.1'3333333331'''1140.5'L=2 922 .9'9970.2'L=32.9'59.3'91.3'L=30.1'L=16.8LL'88LLL116.6'L=50.1'141.7'45.8'92.5'104.2'L=35 .7 '115.4'L=36.2'107.1'7.1'7.1'114.2'116.8'L=35.3'79.7'5.3'.364.4'L=44.3'108.4'L=32.9'33.0'''L=16.8 'L88=88 33.5'L=3 7 .9 'L=41.4'L=36.0'L=50.6'100.5'L=16.8 '36.0'L=31.4'3378.1'96.7'39.1'L=25.6'8.8'8LL23.7'73.5'20.9'88L=15.12222L ==11=LL==1 LL9 .9'99L==688.1'147.0'120.2'80.3'20.4'23.4'145.5'53.0'45.3'120.1'72.6'10.7'108810,444 SF120.8'52.5'52.5'133.4'133.4'L=42.4'L=39.7'112.1'L=17.33'L=L1LL6LL.8=='8836.2'L=3133.4'44108.4'4488666688222222222139.9'L=17.88'65.3'117.3'L=36.8'47.5'L=49.5'L=44.1'33.7'138.2'91.7'LL..8888=8825.6'74.0'133.9'31.4'L=49.8'4.7'4125.7'74.5'74.0'40.1'L=43.50.7'7''125.3'FF2.6'6L=48.1'2.1'.119.7'FFL=22.44'37.8'74.0'74.0'142.5'FF49.1'L''=36.1'65.8'L=8..2'161.5'FFL=39.5'38.3'L=47.3'162.9'L=46.4'38.2'L55=5544.8'33L''==11.5'LL=21.9'36.0'143.2'68.1'75.4'127.2'L=17.66'59.5'27.5'L=32.28.9'22''L8.98.=9914.88'130.0'28.1'L''=39.0'L11=4400..8888.8833'''LL11=44==4444001880888933.9 'L=62.1'109.8'86.8'L=49.7'102.4'144.6'63.7'110.0'57.2'L=16.8'L1166=88388''3.6'L=85.4'70.4'14.2'1L=65.9'26.2'L.2.=2229.9 '54.7'10.7'66.6'77.3'7.2'770.1'77.3'110.0'80.8'110.0'80.8'110.0'80.8'73.6'110.0'80.8'3.7'777.1'110.0'0.2'.77.3'110.0'2.4'2..74.9'77.3'109.9'L=12.4'74.1'82.8'L=33.3'76.0'L=3133.4'4464.3'L 22.=1122222222 ===.7 LL'0.2'.2.L=170011222'2229.7'L=70.7'8.9'L33=45.0'PHASE 3 - 49 LOTSAS9LO399SSSS7111PHASE 1 - 23 LOTSPHASE 3 - 49 LOTSPHASE 2 - 37 LOTSPHASE 2 - 37 LOTSR55'55559PHASE 1 - 23 LOTSPHASE 3 - 49 LOTSOTPHHASSerrano HeightsA project in the City of Pasco, WAPreliminary plat for:July 25, 2018Date:0074.00JF Eng. Job #5220 S. Auburn PlKennewick, WA 99337(509) 551-8174 PHNwww.JFEngineering.proCIVIL ENGINEERINGPROJECT MANAGEMENTPLANNINGENGINEERING, PLLCChecked by: JEFDrawn by: KWETATEOFWASHNG T ON JOHNERICFETTER O L F DEDDREENIGNELANOIISSEFORP C100Scale V: N/AScale H: 1"=80'Know what'sR'C' LANECENTRAL CT.'D' LANEMASSEY DRIVEVALLEY VIEW PLACE'A' LANE'B' LANENORTH DRIVEW. NO R T H C T.CHAPEL HILL BLVD.E. NORTH CT.EXISTING 100' EASMENT117-510-039RIVERHAWK POINTE II PRELIMINARY PLATSERRANO HEIGHTS SUBDIVISIONLOCATED IN THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 16, T 9 N, R 29 E OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIANPROPERTY BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHICSURVEY PROVIDED BY HDJ, A DIVISION OF PBS,2017.BASIS OF BEARING IS: NAD83/91 WASHINGTON STATEPLANE, SOUTH ZONE HOLDING THE COORDINATES FORPOINT 1507 PER RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 3774, BEING ABRASS CAP IN CASE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OFSECTION 16, T9N, R29E, W.M., LOCATED AT THEINTERSECTION OF ARGENT ROAD AND ROAD 84. THENGVD29 ELEVATION OF 390.12 AS LISTED BY CITY OF PASCO(PSI #53-16) FORTHIS MONUMENT WAS HELD.VERTICAL DATUM IS CITY OF PASCO DATUM, PSI10-33, ELEV: 357.65TAX ID # OF SUBJECT PARCEL: 117-510-036COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIALLAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION: R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIALCURRENT PROPERTY USE: AGRICULTURALTOTAL PARCEL AREA:38.1 Ac, 1,659,196 SFPHASE 1: 23 LOTSPHASE 2: 37 LOTSPHASE 3: 49 LOTSTOTAL LOTS: 109AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 9,810 SFMIN. LOT SIZE: 7,306 SF (LOT 82)LARGEST LOT SIZE: 25,977 SF (LOT 109)R/W AREA: 346,375 SFANTICIPATED TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION SPRING2019 AND COMPLETE BY 2023, DEPENDANT UPONMARKET CONDITIONS.PUBLIC STREETS, UTILITIES, AND STORMWATERPUBLIC STREETS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO CITYOF PASCO STANDARD 3-2A, LOCAL ACCESSSTREETS AND CUL-DE-SAC BULB. THIS SECTIONINCLUDES CURBS, GUTTERS, AND SIDEWALKS.CITY POTABLE WATER, IRRIGATION, ANDSANITARY SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED TO EACHLOT WITHIN THE PLAT. FIRE HYDRANTS WILL BEINSTALLED AND LOCATED PER THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY FIRE CHIEF.SANITARY SEWER EXISTS WITHIN AN EASEMENTTHROUGH THIS PROJECT AND WILL BE UTILIZEDTO SERVE THIS PROJECT.STORMWATER RUNOFF WILL BE COLLECTEDFROM PUBLIC STREETS AND DISPOSED OF,ONSITE, IN LOCALIZED SUBSURFACEINFILTRATION SYSTEMS.STREET LIGHTS WILL BE INSTALLED PER THE CITYOF PASCO STANDARDS.PROPERTY AND PLAT STATISTICSLEGENDLOT #LOT TOTAL AREARESIDENTIALRIVER...ADJACENT USEADJACENT SUBDIVISION NAME117-510-033CO TAX ID #UNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)30'30'30'30'117-510-167EXTG 10"IRRIGATIONPROP E RT Y B O U N D A R Y 117-510-038117-641-062117-641-071EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENT FCID CANALFCID CANALEXISTING 50'CANAL ROWEXISTING 20'EASEMENT(RESIDENTIAL)(RESIDENTIAL)ROAD 76EXISTING IRRIGATIONPIVOTCHIAWANA PLACE PRELIMINARY PLAT117-510-037CHIAWANA HIGH SCHOOL117-590-010EXISTING 75'GAS EASEMENPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYPROPERTY BOUNDARYCHAPEL HILL BLVD.30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'30'110.0110 0110 0110 030'66R55'R55'R55'40'PROPERTY BOUNDARYAAAAAAAAAARARRRRRRRYRYRYYYYYYYY30'0'0000000030'EXISTING 30'EASEMENTEXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 24" SAN. SEWEREXISTING 30'G330GEASEMENTVICINITY MAP1" = 2,000'±RD 76RD 72RD 80ARGENT RD.I-182RD 84RD 68BURDEN BLVD.HILL BLVD.CHAPELLSITEEUNDEVELOPED(COMMERCIAL)UNDEVELOPED(OFFICE)40'UTILESMT7/25/18SSSSSSSTTTTTTJOEREERTSIGEGRE38322NELANOISSEFORPPPPPPPPPP Page 196 of 368 Looking NorthPage 197 of 368 Looking EastPage 198 of 368 Looking SouthPage 199 of 368 Looking WestPage 200 of 368 Chiawana HS to the Southwest of SitePage 201 of 368 Chapel Hill Boulevard Connect Point to NortheastPage 202 of 368 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7/19/2018 C. Preliminary Plat Serrano Heights, 109-lots (RP Development) (MF# PP 2018-007) Chairwoman Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the preliminary plat application for Serrano Heights. The developer is proposing to develop 104 single family homes on the 38 acre site. It will follow the pattern that the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has set for this property. This plat has a particular set of circumstances relating to access and the layout of streets – the issues and options were discussed. Commissioner Myhrum asked for clarification on the travel study. Mr. White responded that it would be a technical document under the purview of the Engineering Division of the City. Commissioner Myhrum asked if the staff recommendation was to not have Valley View Drive as a thru street. Mr. White said that is correct. Chairwoman Roach asked if staff has considered access to the neighborhood from Argent Road. Mr. White replied that was a potential option in the staff report but would be determined based on the results of the traffic impact analysis. Commissioner Myhrum asked if staff had worked on the canal crossing issues and if they’ve communicated with the applicant. Mr. White said that staff has worked with this developer and he believed they were aware to join this crossing. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Myhrum, to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and set August 16, 2018 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. The motion passed unanimously. Page 203 of 368 PLANNING COMMISISON MINUTES 8/16/2018 B. Preliminary Plat Serrano Heights, 109 lots (RP Development) (MF# PP 2018-007) – Continued from July 19, 2018 Meeting Chairman Myhrum read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the preliminary plat application for Serrano Heights, 109 lots. This item was continued from the previous hearing because the applicant did not receive their packet in time for the last hearing. That has been corrected and the applicant was present. He clarified discrepancies on the agenda and other places on the number of lots proposed. There will either be 104 or 109 lots based on street connections and Planning Commission decision. Staff felt the Planning Commission should look at options to avoid a direct connection from Valley View Place to Road 68 to prevent any issues with traffic safety on Road 68 and existing Valley View Place. Commissioner Portugal asked for clarification on the number of proposed lots. Mr. White said either 104 or 109 lots depending on what the Planning Commission decides on street connections. Stephen Bauman, 5114 Maxim Court, spoke on behalf of his application. He stated that the preliminary plat will be spelled “Sorano” but they are still working out the details. Street names will not continue with the river theme because these homes will be in a different price point than the adjoining neighborhoods so he wishes to have them stand out. He addressed several issues he had with the approval conditions; one of his main concerns being the requirement to sign a non-protest agreement to the LID. He stated that he would not move forward if he is required to sign the agreement – he would seek legal counsel. Commissioner Greenaway asked Mr. Bauman if he would like the Planning Commission to continue the hearing to allow him time to speak with City staff to work out some of the approval conditions. Mr. Bauman replied that he was told by staff that wasn’t an option at this point. He asked the Commissioner where he could go at this point because he felt he has been burned but the City in the past and was not in agreement of the conditions. Commissioner Greenaway asked if Mr. Bauman should withdraw his application and seek legal counsel. Mr. White replied that the staff recommendation will not change. The DNR properties are very problematic. The area is completely unserved by access, it has significant impacts on adjoining and existing street intersections. This is why there is a need for a Page 204 of 368 traffic study. The City has to cover the bases if the LID is formed or if the LID isn’t formed. It is unknown at this time. Staff was hoping the LID decision would be made at this point but it still is not made so the City doesn’t have a lot of options. The City will not adversely impact public health and safety by funneling traffic onto intersections that aren’t improved or capable of handling the additional traffic. And the City must cover all bases in case the LID is the chosen method of addressing traffic concerns. The non-protest agreement involves the assessment of fees on the participants of the LID. With each plat that occurs, there will be another 104 or 109 property owners to deal with. Mr. White said he could clarify the conditions for the Commission or he could pull examples from other approved plats within the DNR property to provide if the hearing were continued. Mr. Bauman stated that he was very clear of the consequences of signing the agreement. He said it cancels his vote and he regrets signing one on the last plat he did. Commissioner Portugal asked the applicant if he was withdrawing his application. Mr. Bauman said he was not willing to accept the plat conditions as they exist since there were too many unanswered questions and fees he felt he would have to pay for twice. Commissioner Portugal asked what options were available in moving forward for the applicant. Mr. White said the Commission needs to address the direction they would like to give to staff. They could approve the plat with the conditions as presented, the hearing could be continued to allow staff to clarify the conditions or they could recommend staff prepare findings and facts for denial of the plat. Commissioner J. Campos stated that as the Planning Commission, it is there job to make decisions and recommendations based on land usage issues. What was before them he felt was past that point and he felt they were asked to provide legal counsel which did not fit their job. The City has made their position clear that they will no t change their recommendation. Commissioner Portugal asked the applicant if he would be willing to continue the hearing to try to work things out with the City or if he wants to withdraw. Mr. Bauman said he was torn on what needs to happen. He will not sign a non-protest agreement as he didn’t feel it was fair and if he signed he wouldn’t get a vote in the LID. Michael Morales, Community & Economic Development Deputy Director, gave clarification on LID’s. The City would act as a financing instrument to make something happen. If the developer doesn’t want an LID, they can pay for all the costs themselves. The vote is right now during this process with one property owner – rather than waiting five years from now when there are hundreds of property owners who had no idea what went into constructing that subdivision. This is a standard urban planning practice all over the country and state. The best way to do an LID is when there is one property Page 205 of 368 owner. Mr. Bauman said the he disagreed. He said he was at an impasse because the City has said they will not budge but neither would he. Chairman Myhrum offered to continue the hearing at this time. Commissioner J. Campos said that the Planning Commission has to make a motion based on what’s in front of them. Mr. White went over the options one more time for the applicant and Commissioners. Mr. Bauman asked about the appeal process. Chairman Myhrum stated that the applicant can appeal whatever decision the Planning Commission makes. Mr. Bauman asked what the appeal would do. Mr. White replied that it would go to a closed record hearing with City Council and they would make the final decision. There was further discussion on the options and process. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Campos moved to continue the hearing and deliberations to the September 20, 2018 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Page 206 of 368 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/20/2018 B. Preliminary Plat Serrano Heights, 109 lots (RP Development) (MF# PP 2018-007) – Continued from August 16, 2018 Meeting Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the continued preliminary plat application for Serrano Heights. This item has been before the Planning Commission numerous times. The plat consists of 38 acres, divided into 109 lots. The applicant had issues with a number of the conditions discussed at the previous hearing and it was concerning that the applicant was not p resent at the current meeting, however, they were notified. The biggest factor was the LID for the Chapel Hill Boulevard Extension. At the time of the previous hearing, the LID was formed by City Council but there was a 30 day protest period. Since the hearing, the protest period expired and the there was only roughly 1% opposition so the LID has been approved. Some of the conditions in the staff report have been changed to reflect the LID and those changes were discussed. Staff is recommending adoption of the recommendations. There was dialogue between Chairwoman Roach, Commissioner Bowers, Commissioner J. Campos and staff pertaining to the updated conditions and the connection of Valley View Drive. Mr. White responded to the conditions and addressed the design of the revised plat and that eliminates Valley View Drive from becoming a thru street to Road 68 due to traffic safety. The applicant may appeal if they choose. With no applicant present the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the preliminary plat for Serrano Heights with conditions as listed in the September 20, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Portugal acknowledged that the applicant had mentioned at the previous hearing changing the spelling of the plat. Commissioner Campos and Rick White stated that it doesn’t pertain to the approval of the plat and that it is common for developers to make those changes at the time of the final plat process. Page 207 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 26, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-4 Zone (MF# SP 2018-007) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Reports to Planning Commission Dated: 08/16/2018 and 09/20/2018 Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 08/16/2018 and 09/20/2018 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.____, granting a special permit for the location of wireless communication facilities at 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On August 16, 2018 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend approval for the location of wireless communication facilities at 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E (Parcel #117 420 011). Wireless Communication facilities are regulated in the City by Pasco Municipal Code 25.70.075, as follows: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: Page 208 of 368 1. Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. 2. Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: a. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty- five (35) feet; or b. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 3. All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: a. Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/ or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public rights- of-way, and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. b. Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: i. Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii. Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii. Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). iv. If an applicant chooses to construct a new freestanding wireless communication facility, the burden of proof shall be on the applicant to show a wireless communication facility located on a higher order of preference site cannot reasonably be accommodated. The city reserves the right to retain a qualified consultant, at the applicant’s expense, to review the supporting documentation for accuracy. 4. All applications for building permits must be accompanied by verification of approval by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and any other state or federal requirements for tower design and location. Additionally all tower construction plans must be designed and stamped by a licensed professional engineer. 5. All wireless communication facilities shall be removed by the facility owner within 6 months of the date the facility ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair. Following the conduct of a public hearing the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to allow for the location of wireless communication facilities, and recommend approval of the Special Permit with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation was received. Page 209 of 368 V. DISCUSSION: Sprint Wireless proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array concealed in a cupola on the roof of a three story apartment building located at 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E. The proposed antennae would be designed and painted to match existing building. The proposal also includes a 9' X 19' fenced area in the southeast corner of the parking lot for auxiliary equipment. Page 210 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-007SITE0 100 200 300 400 500FeetPage 211 of 368 RESOLUTION NO._______ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE FOR THE LOCATION OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AT 6626 CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD, BUILDING #E. WHEREAS, Sprint Spectrum LP submitted an application for the location of a Wireless Communication Facilities at 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E (Parcel #117 420 011); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 16, 2018 to review a Special Permit for the proposed Wireless Communication Facilities; and, WHEREAS, following deliberations on September 20, 2018 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Special Permit for location of the Wireless Communication Facilities with certain conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: 1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to Sprint Spectrum LP for Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-4 Zoning district under Master File #SP 2018- 007 with the following conditions: a. The special permit shall apply to parcel #117 420 011; b. The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the elevations and site plan submitted with the application; c. The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; d. The cupola, wireless equipment, and all its associated ground equipment and appurtenances must be removed within 90 days of discontinuation. e. The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. 2. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1st day of October, 2018. _______________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ _____________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 212 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2018-007 APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum LP HEARING DATE: 08/16/2018 655 Bradford Lane ACTION DATE: 09/20/2018 Idaho Falls, ID 83404 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-4 (High Density Residential District) Zone 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Short Plat 2004-24 LOT 2 General Location: 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E (Parcel #117 420 011). Property Size: The parcel is approximately 3 acres; the lease area contains approximately 171 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array to be built inside a cupola on building #E. 2. ACCESS: The site is accessed from Roads 68 and 76 and Burden Blvd. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are currently available to the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned R-4 (High Density Residential District) and contains three apartment buildings. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 Vacant; Mini-Storage; Retail Commercial EAST: R-1, R-3 SFDUs; Multi-Family SOUTH: R-1 SFDUs WEST: R-4 Apartments 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Residential uses. Goal UF-2 suggests the City ought to maintain land use flexibility in regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. Policy UF-2-A encourages the sound management of all energy and communication utilities through coordination and cooperation dealing with construction of such facilities. Policy UF-2-B Page 213 of 368 2 encourages the placement of utility substations which are necessary for the surrounding neighborhood. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non- Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11-355). ANALYSIS Sprint Wireless proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array concealed in an 8' X 8' X 9' cupola on the roof of a three story apartment building located at 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E. Sprint will also fence off a 9' X 19' area in the southeast corner of the existing parking lot in order to house a power meter and fiber optic connection box. The proposed antennae would be located in a cupola on the south end of the building and would be designed and painted to match existing building. The PMC special permit review criteria for wireless facilities are written as follows: 25.70.075 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: (1) Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. (2) Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: (a) Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or (b) Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. (3) All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: (a) Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public Page 214 of 368 3 rights-of-way and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. (b) Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: i) Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii) Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii) Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). Commonly, cellular providers locate the equipment cabinets within a fenced area surrounding the base of a pole; in this case the ground-level equipment is proposed to be located behind a sight-obscuring fence in the southeast corner of the parking lot. The screening must meet design requirements of the I-182 Overlay District (PMC 25.58). Typical neighborhood concerns expressed over proposed cell towers in the past have included fear of electromagnetic radio waves and the unsightliness of tall towers within the neighborhood. Because the antennae will be mounted in a cupola designed and painted to match the existing building the provisions for tower height do not apply to this application. As well, under Federal regulations cities are barred from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers. An application for a cell tower cannot be denied based on concern over electromagnetic waves, provided the equipment meets FCC standards. INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned R-4 (High Density Residential District). 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Mixed Residential uses. 3. The site is approximately 3 acres; the lease area contains approximately 171 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array to be built inside a cupola on building #E. 4. The site contains three apartment buildings adjacent 10 similar buildings to the east. Page 215 of 368 4 5. The proposed antennae will be mounted inside a cupola mounted on the top of building “E” which will be designed and painted to match the current building. 6. All municipal utilities currently serve the site. 7. In the R-4 zone cellular facilities may be permitted by special permit provided the tower is either: i. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or ii. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 8. The proposed cellular antennae will be mounted inside a cupola on the top of an existing 49’ tall apartment building. 9. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured 9'x19' area in the southeast corner of the existing parking lot. 10. Federal regulations bar the City from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers or denying permits based upon concerns over electromagnetic radio waves. 11. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the City should maintain land use flexibility with regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. 12. Cellular equipment creates minimal demands on City infrastructure. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address cellular equipment. The Comprehensive Plan goal UF-2 and policy UF-2-A discuss the need for sound management and coordination in the location of utilities and community facilities. Policy UT-1-C encourages coordination of utility providers’ functional plans with the City’s land use and utility plans to ensure long term service availability. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? Page 216 of 368 5 The proposed use is a part of the communication network utilized by the general public. The proposed equipment will be located in such a manner so as not to impact other public utilities or services. The proposed use does not require water and sewer. Only one service trip is expected to be generated each month. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The character of the vicinity is dominated by retail commercial uses to the north, mixed residential to the east, low-density residential to the south, and high-density residential development to the west. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The areas to the north include vacant commercial property and commercial lands under development; properties to the east, south and west are fully developed with permitted uses. The antennae will be located on an existing residential structure inside a cupola designed and painted to match the building. Equipment cabinets will be located within a sight-obscured 9' X 19' area in the southeast corner of the existing parking lot. The Antennae and equipment will likely not be noticeable from any surrounding properties. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The proposed cellular equipment will create no fumes, dust or noise during normal operations. Cellular facilities have been located throughout the community in residential, commercial and industrial zones without generating any complaints received by the City. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposal is required to be designed by a professional engineer to withstand the forces of nature. The applicant is also required by law to coordinate with the FAA and FCC prior to obtaining a building permit. Radio waves at frequencies utilized by local cellular networks have not been proven to be harmful to human health. Federal law prohibits the City from considering the impacts of radio wave frequencies when reviewing permits for cellular equipment. TENTATIVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS Page 217 of 368 6 1) The special permit shall apply to parcel #117 420 011; 2) The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the elevations and site plan submitted with the application except as conditioned herein; 3) The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; 4) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed Sprint Spectrum antennae and equipment proposal, and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the September 20, 2018 meeting. Page 218 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-007SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 219 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-007SITE0 100 200 300 400 500FeetPage 220 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-007SITE0 100 200 300 400 500FeetVacantMulti-FamilyMulti-FamilySFDUsSFDUsCommercialVacantComm.VacantPage 221 of 368 RS-12C-1ZoningMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-0070 100 200 300 400 500FeetR-4R-3R-1R-1C-1R-3RTSITEPage 222 of 368 Page 223 of 368 Template Version: 4:3GBED1.2Version Date: 01/05/16©2016 Sprint. This information is subject to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Sprint and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted, confidential or privileged materials intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure is prohibited without authorization.4Sprint Proprietary and Confidential InformationSE90XC186 Crossings at Chapel Hill Apartments 6626 Chapel Hill BLVD LegendProposed NewSitesExistingOnAirSiteCurrent 1900LTECoverageProposed1900LTECoverageCurrent 1900 LTE Coverage – PascoProposed 1900 LTE Coverage – Pasco Page 224 of 368 Ill Ii I -!,4i;' ----- --~ i REGION MAP ~ am LOCATION 9 _ .. _~:.. ' AERIAL MAP I ... -i.:..i..;.;:.:. .-.J • =---·.~~ ~ -;;. __ IH.2. • , ~.:a =·,'G ' . ' " . ~ -:-;. r-=-=:.. . -. :.;:;_~· ~ ~-:-~" :·'· JURISDICTION COMPLIANCE ML WORK S~ BE PERFORMED AUD rMTER~ !!~STALLED It~ ACCOROHlCE WITH THE CURREt.ff EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES 1'S AOOPlEO l?r' THE L.DCAL GOVER~J lt4G AUTHORITIES. NOTHING l~J TH ESE PLANS IS TO BE O'.lNSTRU EO TO PERMIT WORK tl<lT COtJFORMllJG TO THESE CODES. 1. 201 S I r.JTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2. Ar~Sl(TIA-222 STRUCTUPJ>L STANDARD 3. tJFPA 780 -LIGHTI'l ING PROTECTION COOE 4.. 2.015 rlATIOrlAL El.ECTRI~ com: @ CALL IDAHO ONB CALL (800) 482-4950 CALL! 'll'OllXING DA'llll llllFOllE YOUDIG1 THE lJTILITI ES "5 SHOWtJ otJ THIS SET OF DRAWINGS WERE DEVELOPED FROM THE l~JFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE rtJFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT IMPLIED NOR rtJTENDED TO BE THE CDl.4PLETE lt.JVEtJTORr OF lJTILrTIES IN THIS I-REA. rr 15 1HE CCf'.JTRACTOR"S RESPOt~SIBIUTY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIOt~ OF & UTILITIES (WHETHER SHOWN OR ~lOT) AND PROlECT SAID UTILITIES FROM M'ff ~AGE CAUSED BY COIJTRAGTOR'S ACTIVITIES. PROJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD EXPANSION SITE NAME: CROSSING AT CHAPEL HILL APARTMENTS SITE NUMBER: SP90XC186 SITE ADDRESS: 6626 CHAPEL HILL BL VD PASO, WA 99301 JURISDICTION: FRANKLIN COUNTY SITE TYPE: 46' ROOFTOP SITE INFORMATION SITE ADDRESS: 0028 CHAPEL Hill. BL\o!J PAOO, WA 99:501 COUNTY: FFWlKLlt< ZONING JURISDICTION: FFWIKLlrJ COUrlTY POWER COMPANY: lllO TBD AAV PROVIDER: lllD PROPERTY OWNER: lltE CltOSSINCB Al 0tAPa. tm.1 l'HASE IU.C POICXNUXW FQeTWORTH, IX1'161 STRUCTURE INrDRt..IATION: LATITUDE: +s· 15• 36.36" N (too B3) 41i.2601" LONGITUDE: 119" 10' l<l.72"W (NAD 83) -119.175~' GROUND ELEVATION: +69' STRUCTURE HEIGHT: 46' AGL STRUCTURE TYPE: ROOFTOP ANTENNA CEMTERL.INE: +•·-o·± AGL APPLICANT: SPRINT CONTACT: SoRINT 65!!10 SPRIMT P,&,RKWAY OvERWJD PARK. KS 66251 LAURA BEFITELLOTTI LAUAA BERTELLOTllQSPRlr.JT.COM HEETI Mg. T-1 ITITLE SHEET DRAWING INDEX SHEET TITLE Z-1 IOYE!tb.LL SITE Pl.AtJ Z-2. IEQUIPMEJ'ff PL.AtJ Z-J IEOUIPMEJ'ff PL.AtJ Z-4 IELEYATimis REV PLHIS PREPARED FOR;------. -..-"""""" > Sprint PlPJ'lS PREPARED FOR;------. ·:MasTec IXJ 8, IXllJGLAS ROAD. 12111 fUlOR cc.w. GAllBI, R. Sl114 PLNllS PREPARED :·~ftl­-,CO- -.irl'48 HOii -h---..-.. .. _. .... __ _..__ ---EJ'JCtN EERING LICEtJSE: ~N<lTICE: mrll•ClllR9Tw.Mi..-T'ISICllMOPET MG.,...,.,.. • ........._-.W.m Wl"llDIJTIE ~WllllTElltnmll'lflf...,., SUBMITT.M..S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE 8 1 REV '"'~ CB.1~18 1M , ~ED mt Rr.EW lll.04.JB Jll 0 MASTEC CONTACT: MASTEC CM: r Af'PUCIMT SITE t<•ME' CH RISTltlE Wl orn CHR1sr1NE.LANorn11MASITC.coM CROSSING AT CHAPEL I ;~,:JE;,A:::;""'' lfilL APARTMENTS 5EAt4.NAGEOTTEi!IMASTEC.C<JM ll PHOIJE' 310.910.BOlJ r Af'PUCIWT SITE CASCAIJL DIRECTIONS I APPROVALS I PROJECT INFORMATION CONSULTING TEAM SP90XClS6 I - DIRECTlmJs FROM PASCO. WA: DEPART TOWAAO r~ 41H AVE., TUR~I LEFT oroo ~I 4lH AYE, TURN RIGHT or.sro w r11XON ST, TUArJ LEFT or.sro ~l JRO AVE, BEAR RIGHT OtJTO tJ 41H AYE., TAKE R.AA1P LEFT FOR 1-182 WEST / US-12 WEST TOWARO IMIMA, AT D:IT 9, TME RliUP ~lGHT NJD FOLLOW SIGUS FOR RIJ!<D 68, lURtJ LEFT or.rm rJ ROAD 86, TURN LEFT or.JTO CHAPEL Hill.. BL\IO, ARRIYE AT C~EL Hill.. BLVD ON THE RIGHT. THE LAST INTERSECTIOtJ IS AINTREE IJ'J, IF YOU RD.CH CHAPEL HILL BLVD, IOU\.£ GOrJE TOO FAR, ~li26 CHAPEL Hill.. BLVD, PASOO, WA 99301 SIGNER SPRINT CONSTRUCTION MM AGER SPRINT OPERATIONS MANAGER SPRINT RF ENGINEER LANOL.oRO SIGNATURE DATE • • lrlST.U <2) CABlrlETS rSITE ADDRESS:-- 1 lrlSTM.l. { 1) POWER PRCTTECTION CABlrl ET ME FIRM' T-SQUARED SITE SERVICES, Ll.C 6626 CBAPBL llILL BL VD :~:~~ ~~~ ~:;;BINET ~~~rr~1g~.LA~~ ~~SUITE 201 PASO, WA99l()l lrlSTM.l. { 1) CONCRETE EQU IPMEtJT PAO (724) 306-7855 INSTALL {S) At.JTENtJ.\S lrlSTAl...L (J) 1!300 RRU':!I l~lSTMl.. {3) 1900 RRUs l"STM.l. {1) STEALTH CUPOLA l"STM.l. (4) rrr!lRID CABLES PROJECT MANAGERS! HOSS cor~SUL llNG 4~0 W. .5TH AVEtJUE DENVER, CO 8021>4 :!IDJ.J24.074g cm.JTACT: ED MAGINU 2.0B.530.-Q 1 .39 DWG ltJFORM ION: DAA'ffl'J Irr; JI CHECKED BY: Gl'lt Page 225 of 368 CH/li~EL HILL BLVD ·PROPERTY LJPlE 0 I / PROPERTY LI tJE P.1f:ADOW$ LPJJE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- N ' 1/1&" = 1'-0" Page 226 of 368 1/7" ~EXISrnJG' ~~\ '-------r -lllDIJH CIAllA / ~ ~C<ISTirJG' BUILDING ' ~ ~EXISlltJG"" ASPl"W...T ~XISlll<G' BUIL.DllJG ' I I c __________ _ (4)Pllll'CIEllML4"_7----- ~EXISTltJG'-. ASPHALT ""- --Q&lll ---------l'alt' ff --~ i.. FlllCIE ~ 9UIJS --- r.11' -IDIE ----- --U1Ul'I ~--;::::::::::r::::..! -POllllllUO PPC -----7'1110' CIKllDE 1'1111 + PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. _Sptt........,. > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FOR;------. ·:-MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGLAll R(W). '12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PW,JS PREPARED :·~ftl­-,CO- ~ HOii -h---..-.. PWiJS PREPARED : ___ _ _ ...... ---EJJClNEERING LICEtJSE:------. ~R.\llllJG NOTICE: mrll•ClllR9ftl&Mi.• T'ISICllMOPET I MGllM'mr•--....-.wmm Wl"llDIJTIE._MllTEll~flf...,.. SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE I BY I REV "''~ CB.15.181 JPA I 1 ~ED mt Ar.EW al.D4JB I JN I c r CROSS8ING,AT CHAPEL I HILL APARTMBNTS [~PUCAIIT ~~~;~186 I r SITE ADDRESS' I 6626 CBAPBL llILL BLVD PASO, WA99301 I DWG ltJFOR" IDrJ: [SHEET tJU"BER' l I I 112· = 1·-0· I 1 ~~~E~~' ! Z-2 EOUIPIAENT Pl AN Page 227 of 368 .......... .......... _ .... --------..... :::..:::. ..................... .... ..... KEYED NOTES: ..... ..... ............................... .............. -... .......................... ..... .... -..... -_/-..... :.:.-:, ......... _ ............................... ..._ ....... ............. ....... ......... (4) PROPDllD u.o. 4• .................................. -.. .._ 1'1111-CllLD ..... -, ............................... ...... ...... -- ~E<IST1r1G'-._ ASPHALT ""- 0 1Q'-----------------J ROlJTE H'r'ERI D CMJL£S U.G. FROM EQUIPMDJT PAD TO BUILnltJG TO >tJTHJM!i. CEtJTEHUUE. SH::URE />S REQ!J IRED PER SA. ................ ..... "" .............. -... ..... -.... ..... ...... ...... ....................................... ....... -... .............. .... ----:.;i l'lcll'-LDSI!~ -.:"'..:=--/I r --- ~ I A ~4"QDIDlll" -~ ----, ~---4•_5• ___ __, --""'""--I.NI l'DICI! 'l/PflNll:f UIS --IJllJl'I ~. -""10' -~l'PC -1'111) "' ,._ j + PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. _Sptt........,. > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FOR;------. ·:-MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGLAll R(W). '12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PWllS PREPARED :·~ftl­-,CO- ~ HOii -h---..-.. PWilS PREPARED : ___ _ _ ...... ---EJJClNEERING LICEtJSE:------. I ~Ro\llllJG NOTICE: ,... IKIQAll.,_ClllR9ftl&Mi.• T'ISICllMOPET I •1191T'~llM'mr•--....-.wmm Wl"llDIJTIE._MllTEll~flf...,-. SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE I BY IRE\/ "''~ CB.15.181 JPA I 1 ~ED mt Ar.EW al.D4JB I JN I c r CROSS8ING,AT CHAPEL I HILL APARTMBNTS [~PUCAIIT ~~~;~186 I r SITE ADDRESS' I 6626 CBAPBL llILL BLVD PASO, WA99301 I DWG ltJFOR" IDrl: [SHEET tJU"BER' l I EOUIPIAENT Pl AN I 1/2" = 1·-0· I 1 ~~~Er\"~, ! Z-3 Page 228 of 368 STRUCTURE INFORtJA.TIOt.I IS SHOWN FQ.R IWJSTRATJVE PtJRPOSES ONLY. STRUCTLJRAL INTEGRITY or StJPPORTlt'lG STRUCT\JRES, AHTEN~ MOUNTS, ANO FOUNDATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS ACCEPTABLE BY Nl rnGINEER CERTIFIED STRUCTURAL Atw_rs1s. UTILIZING THE tJEW LOADlrJG REPRESEtJTED 1MTHIN THESE DRAWl~JGS PRIOR TO THE EXECl.ITICN OF EOIJIPMEtlT CHAllCES COtJTAltlED 11~ THESE OR(<.Wlt~GS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAlrJ .tJ..l. STRUCTI.JRAL REPORTS .MJD FOLLOW ALL RECOl.H.iE~JDATIONS. ACT\..IAL EQUIPMEtJT LOCATiot~S MAY SLlGHllY VA~ BASED otJ Fltw_ STF!UCTU RAL NlAL YSIS. EE GR'>JJE Gl>ADE EE EB SOUTH ELEVATION GB EAST El EYAT!ON TOP OF CUPOLA rJ.. <ti ELBI. 55' O"± AGL V lf~5TAl...1.. SPRlr-IT At.JTEI'Hol-\5 iD El.£\1. 49 -S ±: AGL TCP OF EXISTING ROOF ~ ______ 1 G ELEV. 46 -O'I AGL 3/16" = 1'-0" PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. -Sptt"""""' > Sprint PlPJ'lS PREPARED FOR; ·:-MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGLAll R(W). '12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PWllS PREPARED :·~ftl­-,CO- ~ HOii -h---..-.. PWilS PREPARED : ___ _ _ ...... ---EJJClNEERING UCErJSE: DATE I BY IRE\/ "''~ CB.15.181 JPA I 1 ~ED mt Ar.EW ai.114..1B I JN I c r CROSS8ING,AT CHAPEL I HILL APARTMBNTS [~PUCAIIT ~~~;~186 I r SITE ADORESS' I 6626 CBAPBL llILL BLVD PASO, WA99301 DWG ltJFORM ION: DAA'ffl'J Irr; JI CH ECKEO BY: Gl'lt Page 229 of 368 Prepared by: T·8QU.AllED SITE 8ERVICE8, LLC Prepared for: Sprint~ ~e ·:-MasTec SP90XC186-A CHAPEL HILL 6626 Chapel Hill Blvd. Pasco, WA LOOKING NORTHWEST Page 230 of 368 Looking NorthPage 231 of 368 Looking EastPage 232 of 368 Looking SouthPage 233 of 368 Looking WestPage 234 of 368 SitePage 235 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2018-007 APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum LP HEARING DATE: 08/16/2018 655 Bradford Lane ACTION DATE: 09/20/2018 Idaho Falls, ID 83404 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-4 (High Density Residential District) Zone 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Short Plat 2004-24 LOT 2 General Location: 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E (Parcel #117 420 011). Property Size: The parcel is approximately 3 acres; the lease area contains approximately 171 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array to be built inside a cupola on building #E. 2. ACCESS: The site is accessed from Roads 68 and 76 and Burden Blvd. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are currently available to the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned R-4 (High Density Residential District) and contains three apartment buildings. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 Vacant; Mini-Storage; Retail Commercial EAST: R-1, R-3 SFDUs; Multi-Family SOUTH: R-1 SFDUs WEST: R-4 Apartments 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Residential uses. Goal UF-2 suggests the City ought to maintain land use flexibility in regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. Policy UF-2-A encourages the sound management of all energy and communication utilities through coordination and cooperation dealing with construction of such facilities. Policy UF-2-B Page 236 of 368 2 encourages the placement of utility substations which are necessary for the surrounding neighborhood. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. ANALYSIS Sprint Wireless proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array concealed in an 8' X 8' X 9' cupola on the roof of a three story apartment building located at 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E. Sprint will also fence off a 9' X 19' area in the southeast corner of the existing parking lot in order to house a power meter and fiber optic connection box. The proposed antennae would be located in a cupola on the south end of the building and would be designed and painted to match existing building. The PMC special permit review criteria for wireless facilities are written as follows: 25.70.075 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: (1) Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. (2) Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: (a) Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or (b) Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. (3) All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: (a) Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public Page 237 of 368 3 rights-of-way and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. (b) Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: i) Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii) Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii) Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). Commonly, cellular providers locate the equipment cabinets within a fenced area surrounding the base of a pole; in this case the ground-level equipment is proposed to be located behind a sight-obscuring fence in the southeast corner of the parking lot. The screening must meet design requirements of the I-182 Overlay District (PMC 25.58). Typical neighborhood concerns expressed over proposed cell towers in the past have included fear of electromagnetic radio waves and the unsightliness of tall towers within the neighborhood. Because the antennae will be mounted in a cupola designed and painted to match the existing building the provisions for tower height do not apply to this application. As well, under Federal regulations cities are barred from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers. An application for a cell tower cannot be denied based on concern over electromagnetic waves, provided the equipment meets FCC standards. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned R-4 (High Density Residential District). 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Mixed Residential uses. 3. The site is approximately 3 acres; the lease area contains approximately 171 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array to be built inside a cupola on building #E. 4. The site contains three apartment buildings adjacent 10 similar buildings to the east. Page 238 of 368 4 5. The proposed antennae will be mounted inside a cupola mounted on the top of building “E” which will be designed and painted to match the current building. 6. All municipal utilities currently serve the site. 7. In the R-4 zone cellular facilities may be permitted by special permit provided the tower is either: i. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or ii. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 8. The proposed cellular antennae will be mounted inside a cupola on the top of an existing 49’ tall apartment building. 9. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured 9'x19' area in the southeast corner of the existing parking lot. 10. Federal regulations bar the City from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers or denying permits based upon concerns over electromagnetic radio waves. 11. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the City should maintain land use flexibility with regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. 12. Cellular equipment creates minimal demands on City infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address cellular equipment. The Comprehensive Plan goal UF-2 and policy UF-2-A discuss the need for sound management and coordination in the location of utilities and community facilities. Policy UT-1-C encourages coordination of utility providers’ functional plans with the City’s land use and utility plans to ensure long term service availability. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? Page 239 of 368 5 The proposed use is a part of the communication network utilized by the general public. The proposed equipment will be located in such a manner so as not to impact other public utilities or services. The proposed use does not require water and sewer. Only one service trip is expected to be generated each month. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The character of the vicinity is dominated by retail commercial uses to the north, mixed residential to the east, low-density residential to the south, and high-density residential development to the west. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The areas to the north include vacant commercial property and commercial lands under development; properties to the east, south and west are fully developed with permitted uses. The antennae will be located on an existing residential structure inside a cupola designed and painted to match the building. Equipment cabinets will be located within a sight-obscured 9' X 19' area in the southeast corner of the existing parking lot. The Antennae and equipment will likely not be noticeable from any surrounding properties. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The proposed cellular equipment will create no fumes, dust or noise during normal operations. Cellular facilities have been located throughout the community in residential, commercial and industrial zones without generating any complaints received by the City. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposal is required to be designed by a professional engineer to withstand the forces of nature. The applicant is also required by law to coordinate with the FAA and FCC prior to obtaining a building permit. Radio waves at frequencies utilized by local cellular networks have not been proven to be harmful to human health. Federal law prohibits the City from considering the impacts of radio wave frequencies when reviewing permits for cellular equipment. Page 240 of 368 6 APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to parcel #117 420 011; 2) The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the elevations and site plan submitted with the application; 3) The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; 4) The cupola, wireless equipment, and all its associated ground equipment and appurtenances must be removed within 90 days of discontinuation. 5) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Sprint Spectrum LP for the location of a concealed rooftop cell phone antenna array and its associated ground equipment at 6626 Chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. Page 241 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-007SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 242 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-007SITE0 100 200 300 400 500FeetPage 243 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-007SITE0 100 200 300 400 500FeetVacantMulti-FamilyMulti-FamilySFDUsSFDUsCommercialVacantComm.VacantPage 244 of 368 RS-12C-1ZoningMapItem: Cell Tower in R-4 Zone (Crossings@Chapel Hill)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-0070 100 200 300 400 500FeetR-4R-3R-1R-1C-1R-3RTSITEPage 245 of 368 Page 246 of 368 Template Version: 4:3GBED1.2Version Date: 01/05/16©2016 Sprint. This information is subject to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Sprint and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted, confidential or privileged materials intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure is prohibited without authorization.4Sprint Proprietary and Confidential InformationSE90XC186 Crossings at Chapel Hill Apartments 6626 Chapel Hill BLVD LegendProposed NewSitesExistingOnAirSiteCurrent 1900LTECoverageProposed1900LTECoverageCurrent 1900 LTE Coverage – PascoProposed 1900 LTE Coverage – Pasco Page 247 of 368 Ill Ii I -!,4i;' ----- --~ i REGION MAP ~ am LOCATION 9 _ .. _~:.. ' AERIAL MAP I ... -i.:..i..;.;:.:. .-.J • =---·.~~ ~ -;;. __ IH.2. • , ~.:a =·,'G ' . ' " . ~ -:-;. r-=-=:.. . -. :.;:;_~· ~ ~-:-~" :·'· JURISDICTION COMPLIANCE ML WORK S~ BE PERFORMED AUD rMTER~ !!~STALLED It~ ACCOROHlCE WITH THE CURREt.ff EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES 1'S AOOPlEO l?r' THE L.DCAL GOVER~J lt4G AUTHORITIES. NOTHING l~J TH ESE PLANS IS TO BE O'.lNSTRU EO TO PERMIT WORK tl<lT COtJFORMllJG TO THESE CODES. 1. 201 S I r.JTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2. Ar~Sl(TIA-222 STRUCTUPJ>L STANDARD 3. tJFPA 780 -LIGHTI'l ING PROTECTION COOE 4.. 2.015 rlATIOrlAL El.ECTRI~ com: @ CALL IDAHO ONB CALL (800) 482-4950 CALL! 'll'OllXING DA'llll llllFOllE YOUDIG1 THE lJTILITI ES "5 SHOWtJ otJ THIS SET OF DRAWINGS WERE DEVELOPED FROM THE l~JFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE rtJFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT IMPLIED NOR rtJTENDED TO BE THE CDl.4PLETE lt.JVEtJTORr OF lJTILrTIES IN THIS I-REA. rr 15 1HE CCf'.JTRACTOR"S RESPOt~SIBIUTY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIOt~ OF & UTILITIES (WHETHER SHOWN OR ~lOT) AND PROlECT SAID UTILITIES FROM M'ff ~AGE CAUSED BY COIJTRAGTOR'S ACTIVITIES. PROJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD EXPANSION SITE NAME: CROSSING AT CHAPEL HILL APARTMENTS SITE NUMBER: SP90XC186 SITE ADDRESS: 6626 CHAPEL HILL BL VD PASO, WA 99301 JURISDICTION: FRANKLIN COUNTY SITE TYPE: 46' ROOFTOP SITE INFORMATION SITE ADDRESS: 0028 CHAPEL Hill. BL\o!J PAOO, WA 99:501 COUNTY: FFWlKLlt< ZONING JURISDICTION: FFWIKLlrJ COUrlTY POWER COMPANY: lllO TBD AAV PROVIDER: lllD PROPERTY OWNER: lltE CltOSSINCB Al 0tAPa. tm.1 l'HASE IU.C POICXNUXW FQeTWORTH, IX1'161 STRUCTURE INrDRt..IATION: LATITUDE: +s· 15• 36.36" N (too B3) 41i.2601" LONGITUDE: 119" 10' l<l.72"W (NAD 83) -119.175~' GROUND ELEVATION: +69' STRUCTURE HEIGHT: 46' AGL STRUCTURE TYPE: ROOFTOP ANTENNA CEMTERL.INE: +•·-o·± AGL APPLICANT: SPRINT CONTACT: SoRINT 65!!10 SPRIMT P,&,RKWAY OvERWJD PARK. KS 66251 LAURA BEFITELLOTTI LAUAA BERTELLOTllQSPRlr.JT.COM HEETI Mg. T-1 ITITLE SHEET DRAWING INDEX SHEET TITLE Z-1 IOYE!tb.LL SITE Pl.AtJ Z-2. IEQUIPMEJ'ff PL.AtJ Z-J IEOUIPMEJ'ff PL.AtJ Z-4 IELEYATimis REV PLHIS PREPARED FOR;------. -..-"""""" > Sprint PlPJ'lS PREPARED FOR;------. ·:MasTec IXJ 8, IXllJGLAS ROAD. 12111 fUlOR cc.w. GAllBI, R. Sl114 PLNllS PREPARED :·~ftl­-,CO- -.irl'48 HOii -h---..-.. .. _. .... __ _..__ ---EJ'JCtN EERING LICEtJSE: ~N<lTICE: mrll•ClllR9Tw.Mi..-T'ISICllMOPET MG.,...,.,.. • ........._-.W.m Wl"llDIJTIE ~WllllTElltnmll'lflf...,., SUBMITT.M..S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE 8 1 REV '"'~ CB.1~18 1M , ~ED mt Rr.EW lll.04.JB Jll 0 MASTEC CONTACT: MASTEC CM: r Af'PUCIMT SITE t<•ME' CH RISTltlE Wl orn CHR1sr1NE.LANorn11MASITC.coM CROSSING AT CHAPEL I ;~,:JE;,A:::;""'' lfilL APARTMENTS 5EAt4.NAGEOTTEi!IMASTEC.C<JM ll PHOIJE' 310.910.BOlJ r Af'PUCIWT SITE CASCAIJL DIRECTIONS I APPROVALS I PROJECT INFORMATION CONSULTING TEAM SP90XClS6 I - DIRECTlmJs FROM PASCO. WA: DEPART TOWAAO r~ 41H AVE., TUR~I LEFT oroo ~I 4lH AYE, TURN RIGHT or.sro w r11XON ST, TUArJ LEFT or.sro ~l JRO AVE, BEAR RIGHT OtJTO tJ 41H AYE., TAKE R.AA1P LEFT FOR 1-182 WEST / US-12 WEST TOWARO IMIMA, AT D:IT 9, TME RliUP ~lGHT NJD FOLLOW SIGUS FOR RIJ!<D 68, lURtJ LEFT or.rm rJ ROAD 86, TURN LEFT or.JTO CHAPEL Hill.. BL\IO, ARRIYE AT C~EL Hill.. BLVD ON THE RIGHT. THE LAST INTERSECTIOtJ IS AINTREE IJ'J, IF YOU RD.CH CHAPEL HILL BLVD, IOU\.£ GOrJE TOO FAR, ~li26 CHAPEL Hill.. BLVD, PASOO, WA 99301 SIGNER SPRINT CONSTRUCTION MM AGER SPRINT OPERATIONS MANAGER SPRINT RF ENGINEER LANOL.oRO SIGNATURE DATE • • lrlST.U <2) CABlrlETS rSITE ADDRESS:-- 1 lrlSTM.l. { 1) POWER PRCTTECTION CABlrl ET ME FIRM' T-SQUARED SITE SERVICES, Ll.C 6626 CBAPBL llILL BL VD :~:~~ ~~~ ~:;;BINET ~~~rr~1g~.LA~~ ~~SUITE 201 PASO, WA99l()l lrlSTM.l. { 1) CONCRETE EQU IPMEtJT PAO (724) 306-7855 INSTALL {S) At.JTENtJ.\S lrlSTAl...L (J) 1!300 RRU':!I l~lSTMl.. {3) 1900 RRUs l"STM.l. {1) STEALTH CUPOLA l"STM.l. (4) rrr!lRID CABLES PROJECT MANAGERS! HOSS cor~SUL llNG 4~0 W. .5TH AVEtJUE DENVER, CO 8021>4 :!IDJ.J24.074g cm.JTACT: ED MAGINU 2.0B.530.-Q 1 .39 DWG ltJFORM ION: DAA'ffl'J Irr; JI CHECKED BY: Gl'lt Page 248 of 368 CH/li~EL HILL BLVD ·PROPERTY LJPlE 0 I / PROPERTY LI tJE P.1f:ADOW$ LPJJE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- N ' 1/1&" = 1'-0" Page 249 of 368 1/7" ~EXISrnJG' ~~\ '-------r -lllDIJH CIAllA / ~ ~C<ISTirJG' BUILDING ' ~ ~EXISlltJG"" ASPl"W...T ~XISlll<G' BUIL.DllJG ' I I c __________ _ (4)Pllll'CIEllML4"_7----- ~EXISTltJG'-. ASPHALT ""- --Q&lll ---------l'alt' ff --~ i.. FlllCIE ~ 9UIJS --- r.11' -IDIE ----- --U1Ul'I ~--;::::::::::r::::..! -POllllllUO PPC -----7'1110' CIKllDE 1'1111 + PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. _Sptt........,. > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FOR;------. ·:-MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGLAll R(W). '12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PW,JS PREPARED :·~ftl­-,CO- ~ HOii -h---..-.. PWiJS PREPARED : ___ _ _ ...... ---EJJClNEERING LICEtJSE:------. ~R.\llllJG NOTICE: mrll•ClllR9ftl&Mi.• T'ISICllMOPET I MGllM'mr•--....-.wmm Wl"llDIJTIE._MllTEll~flf...,.. SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE I BY I REV "''~ CB.15.181 JPA I 1 ~ED mt Ar.EW al.D4JB I JN I c r CROSS8ING,AT CHAPEL I HILL APARTMBNTS [~PUCAIIT ~~~;~186 I r SITE ADDRESS' I 6626 CBAPBL llILL BLVD PASO, WA99301 I DWG ltJFOR" IDrJ: [SHEET tJU"BER' l I I 112· = 1·-0· I 1 ~~~E~~' ! Z-2 EOUIPIAENT Pl AN Page 250 of 368 .......... .......... _ .... --------..... :::..:::. ..................... .... ..... KEYED NOTES: ..... ..... ............................... .............. -... .......................... ..... .... -..... -_/-..... :.:.-:, ......... _ ............................... ..._ ....... ............. ....... ......... (4) PROPDllD u.o. 4• .................................. -.. .._ 1'1111-CllLD ..... -, ............................... ...... ...... -- ~E<IST1r1G'-._ ASPHALT ""- 0 1Q'-----------------J ROlJTE H'r'ERI D CMJL£S U.G. FROM EQUIPMDJT PAD TO BUILnltJG TO >tJTHJM!i. CEtJTEHUUE. SH::URE />S REQ!J IRED PER SA. ................ ..... "" .............. -... ..... -.... ..... ...... ...... ....................................... ....... -... .............. .... ----:.;i l'lcll'-LDSI!~ -.:"'..:=--/I r --- ~ I A ~4"QDIDlll" -~ ----, ~---4•_5• ___ __, --""'""--I.NI l'DICI! 'l/PflNll:f UIS --IJllJl'I ~. -""10' -~l'PC -1'111) "' ,._ j + PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. _Sptt........,. > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FOR;------. ·:-MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGLAll R(W). '12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PWllS PREPARED :·~ftl­-,CO- ~ HOii -h---..-.. PWilS PREPARED : ___ _ _ ...... ---EJJClNEERING LICEtJSE:------. I ~Ro\llllJG NOTICE: ,... IKIQAll.,_ClllR9ftl&Mi.• T'ISICllMOPET I •1191T'~llM'mr•--....-.wmm Wl"llDIJTIE._MllTEll~flf...,-. SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE I BY IRE\/ "''~ CB.15.181 JPA I 1 ~ED mt Ar.EW al.D4JB I JN I c r CROSS8ING,AT CHAPEL I HILL APARTMBNTS [~PUCAIIT ~~~;~186 I r SITE ADDRESS' I 6626 CBAPBL llILL BLVD PASO, WA99301 I DWG ltJFOR" IDrl: [SHEET tJU"BER' l I EOUIPIAENT Pl AN I 1/2" = 1·-0· I 1 ~~~Er\"~, ! Z-3 Page 251 of 368 STRUCTURE INFORtJA.TIOt.I IS SHOWN FQ.R IWJSTRATJVE PtJRPOSES ONLY. STRUCTLJRAL INTEGRITY or StJPPORTlt'lG STRUCT\JRES, AHTEN~ MOUNTS, ANO FOUNDATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS ACCEPTABLE BY Nl rnGINEER CERTIFIED STRUCTURAL Atw_rs1s. UTILIZING THE tJEW LOADlrJG REPRESEtJTED 1MTHIN THESE DRAWl~JGS PRIOR TO THE EXECl.ITICN OF EOIJIPMEtlT CHAllCES COtJTAltlED 11~ THESE OR(<.Wlt~GS. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAlrJ .tJ..l. STRUCTI.JRAL REPORTS .MJD FOLLOW ALL RECOl.H.iE~JDATIONS. ACT\..IAL EQUIPMEtJT LOCATiot~S MAY SLlGHllY VA~ BASED otJ Fltw_ STF!UCTU RAL NlAL YSIS. EE GR'>JJE Gl>ADE EE EB SOUTH ELEVATION GB EAST El EYAT!ON TOP OF CUPOLA rJ.. <ti ELBI. 55' O"± AGL V lf~5TAl...1.. SPRlr-IT At.JTEI'Hol-\5 iD El.£\1. 49 -S ±: AGL TCP OF EXISTING ROOF ~ ______ 1 G ELEV. 46 -O'I AGL 3/16" = 1'-0" PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. -Sptt"""""' > Sprint PlPJ'lS PREPARED FOR; ·:-MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGLAll R(W). '12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PWllS PREPARED :·~ftl­-,CO- ~ HOii -h---..-.. PWilS PREPARED : ___ _ _ ...... ---EJJClNEERING UCErJSE: DATE I BY IRE\/ "''~ CB.15.181 JPA I 1 ~ED mt Ar.EW ai.114..1B I JN I c r CROSS8ING,AT CHAPEL I HILL APARTMBNTS [~PUCAIIT ~~~;~186 I r SITE ADORESS' I 6626 CBAPBL llILL BLVD PASO, WA99301 DWG ltJFORM ION: DAA'ffl'J Irr; JI CH ECKEO BY: Gl'lt Page 252 of 368 Prepared by: T·8QU.AllED SITE 8ERVICE8, LLC Prepared for: Sprint~ ~e ·:-MasTec SP90XC186-A CHAPEL HILL 6626 Chapel Hill Blvd. Pasco, WA LOOKING NORTHWEST Page 253 of 368 Looking NorthPage 254 of 368 Looking EastPage 255 of 368 Looking SouthPage 256 of 368 Looking WestPage 257 of 368 SitePage 258 of 368 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 8/16/2018 E. Special Permit Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-4 Zone (Sprint Spectrum LP) (MF# SP 2018- 007) Chairman Myhrum read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit application for the location of wireless communications facilities in an R-4 zone. The proposed site is located at an existing apartment complex on Chapel Hill Boulevard. This will be a stealth tower disguised as a building architectural feature. Commissioner Portugal asked how the City keeps up with technological advances and public concerns. Mr. White replied that the City and State will probably be seeing pre -emption on a Federal level pertaining to wireless communications. The State of Washington considered this in the past for 5G facilities. It did not happen but likely will in 2019. This will probably happen at the Federal level as well. Ed Maginn, Hoss Consulting, Idaho Falls, ID spoke on behalf of the applicant. He explained that the nearby tower at GESA Stadium was full as was another tower, which is why they are proposing a new stealth tower. Co-locating on another tower would have been the preferred and cheaper option but it was not available. The need for a new tower was growth driven, not technology upgrade driven. Commissioner A. Capos asked what happens to the tower if Sprint leaves. Patrick Kelley, Hoss Consulting, Denver, CO stated that the terms of the lease state that Sprint would have to return the site to its original condition should the contract be terminated. Amanda Cameron, 5206 Roosevelt Drive, spoke in opposition to the special permit application. She addressed he thoughts on the ability to make 911 emergency calls. Chris Acevedo, 4619 Phoenix Lane, spoke in opposition to the special permit application. He voiced concern over the applicant being able to increase the height of the tower once this is permitted. Patrick Kelley, Hoss Consulting, Denver, CO addressed the comments and concerns from the audience and stated that each cell carrier has different coverage and technology. Commissioner J. Campos responded to the permitting concerns and how they are located where they are located and whether or not they need speci al permits. He Page 259 of 368 reminded the audience that the Planning Commission cannot deny special permits based on health concerns per the FCC. Commissioner Greenaway addressed permitting concerns and stated that the applicant could not raise the height of the tower without coming back to the Planning Commission because there are approval conditions as a part of the special permit. Eduardo Hernandez, 5301 Montpelier Drive, spoke in opposition to the special permit application and said they already had coverage in the area. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, to close the hearing on the proposed Sprint Spectrum antennae and equipment proposal, and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the September 20, 2018 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Page 260 of 368 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/20/2018 A. Special Permit Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-4 Zone (Sprint Spectrum LP) (MF# SP 2018- 007) Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit application for the location of wireless communication facilities in an R -4 zone. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Sprint Spectrum LP for the location of a concealed rooftop cell phone antenna array and its associated ground equipment at 6626 chapel Hill Boulevard, Building #E, with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Page 261 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 26, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in a C -1 Zone (MF# SP 2018-008) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Reports to Planning Commission Dated: 08/16/2018 and 09/20/2018 Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 08/16/2018 and 09/20/2018 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.____, granting a special permit for the location of wireless communication facilities at 115 South 10th Avenue. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On August 16, 2018 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend approval for the location of wireless communication facilities at 115 South 10th Avenue (Parcel #112-253-124). Wireless Communication facilities are regulated in the City by Pasco Municipal Code 25.70.075, as follows: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: 1. Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts Page 262 of 368 provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. 2. Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: a. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty- five (35) feet; or b. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 3. All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: a. Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/ or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public rights- of-way, and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. b. Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: i. Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii. Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii. Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). c. If an applicant chooses to construct a new freestanding wireless communication facility, the burden of proof shall be on the applicant to show a wireless communication facility located on a higher order of preference site cannot reasonably be accommodated. The city reserves the right to retain a qualified consultant, at the applicant’s expense, to review the supporting documentation for accuracy. 4. All applications for building permits must be accompanied by verification of approval by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and any other state or federal requirements for tower design and location. Additionally all tower construction plans must be designed and stamped by a licensed professional engineer. 5. All wireless communication facilities shall be removed by the facility owner within 6 months of the date the facility ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair. Following the conduct of a public hearing the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to allow for the location of the wireless communication facilities, and recommend approval of the special permit with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation was received. V. DISCUSSION: Page 263 of 368 Sprint proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array (concealed in canisters painted to match the building) on the roof of the Fiesta Foods grocery store. Sprint will also fence off a 10 X 11’ area behind the building in order to house a power meter and fiber optic connection box. No other modifications will be made to the building or property. Page 264 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-008SITE0 100 200 300 400 500FeetPage 265 of 368 RESOLUTION NO._______ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE FOR THE LOCATION OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AT 115 SOUTH 10TH AVENUE. WHEREAS, Sprint Spectrum LP submitted an application for the location of a Wireless Communication Facilities at 115 South 10th Avenue (Parcel #112-253-124); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 16, 2018 to review a Special Permit for the proposed Wireless Communication Facilities; and, WHEREAS, following deliberations on September 20, 2018 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Special Permit for location of the Wireless Communication Facilities with certain conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: 1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to Sprint Spectrum LP for Wireless Communication Facilities in a C-1 Zoning district under Master File #SP 2018- 008 with the following conditions: a. The special permit shall apply to Parcel #112-253-124; b. The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the Modified elevations and site plan submitted with the application; c. The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; d. The wireless equipment and all its associated ground equipment and appurtenances must be removed within 90 days of discontinuation; e. The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. 2. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1st day of October, 2018. _______________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ _____________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 266 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2018-008 APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum LP HEARING DATE: 08/16/2018 655 Bradford Lane ACTION DATE: 09/20/2018 Idaho Falls, ID 83404 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in a C-1 (Retail Business) Zone 1.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: The west ½ of block 3 & all of block 4 of Pettit's Addition except a portion deeded to the City (320291) together with all vacated streets & alleys adjoining. General Location: 115 South 10th Avenue (Parcel #112-253-124). Property Size: The parcel is approximately 3 acres; the lease area contains approximately 110 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array consisting of 6 antennae to be mounted at three locations on the roof. 2.ACCESS: The site is accessed from West Lewis Street, West Columbia Street, and South 10th Avenue. 3.UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are currently available to the site. 4.LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Business) and contains a grocery store. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 Commercial/Mixed Residential EAST: C-1 Commercial (Grigg’s) SOUTH: I-1 Fuel Station/Vacant WEST: C-3 Heavy Commerial 2.COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Commercial uses. Goal UF-2 suggests the City ought to maintain land use flexibility in regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. Policy UF-2-A encourages the sound management of all energy and communication utilities through coordination and cooperation dealing with construction of such facilities. Policy UF-2-B encourages the placement of utility substations which are necessary for the surrounding neighborhood. Page 267 of 368 2 3.ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non- Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11-355). ANALYSIS Sprint proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array (concealed in canisters painted to match the building) on the roof of the grocery store located on the property listed above. Sprint will also fence off a 10 X 11’ area behind the building in order to house a power meter and fiber optic connection box. No other modifications will be made to the building or property. The PMC special permit review criteria for wireless facilities are written as follows: 25.70.075 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: (1) Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. (2) Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: (a) Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or (b) Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. (3) All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: (a) Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public rights-of-way and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. (b) Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: Page 268 of 368 3 i) Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii) Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii) Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). Commonly, cellular providers locate the equipment cabinets within a fenced area surrounding the base of a pole; in this case the ground-level equipment is proposed to be located behind a sight-obscuring fence in the alley behind the building. Typical neighborhood concerns expressed over proposed cell towers in the past have included fear of electromagnetic radio waves and the unsightliness of tall towers within the neighborhood. Under Federal regulations cities are barred from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers. An application for a cell tower cannot be denied based on concern over electromagnetic waves. INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned C-1 (Retail Business). 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Commercial uses. 3. The site is approximately 3 acres; the lease area contains approximately 110 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array on the roof. 4. The site contains a grocery store. 5. The store roof deck is 25’8” tall and a parapet at 26’8” with a cupola extending up another 20’ or so at the store’s west entrance. 6. The proposed antennae will be mounted on the roof at three locations inside of 36’ diameter “Stealth canisters” painted to match the current building. 7. All municipal utilities currently serve the site. 8. In the C-1 zone cellular facilities may be permitted by special permit provided the tower is either: a. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or Page 269 of 368 4 b. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 9. The proposed antennae are not designed to be attached on the parts of the building that exceed 35’ (i.e., the cupola). As such, the proposal does not meet the strict interpretation of code requirement. 10. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured 10’ X 11’ fenced area in the alley behind the store to the east. 11. Federal regulations bar the City from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers or denying permits based upon concerns over electromagnetic radio waves. 12. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the City should maintain land use flexibility with regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. 13. The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address cellular equipment. 14. Cellular equipment creates minimal demands on City infrastructure. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: (1)Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address cellular equipment. The Comprehensive Plan goal UF-2 and policy UF-2-A discuss the need for sound management and coordination in the location of utilities and community facilities. Policy UT-1-C encourages coordination of utility providers’ functional plans with the City’s land use and utility plans to ensure long term service availability. (2)Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed use is a part of the communication network utilized by the general public. The proposed equipment will be located in such a manner so as not to impact other public utilities or services. The proposed use does not require water and sewer. Only one service trip is expected to be generated each month. Page 270 of 368 5 (3)Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The character of the vicinity is a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial uses. (4)Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The areas on all sides are fully developed with a mix of single-family dwelling units, commercial/office buildings, and industrial uses. The antennae would be located in 6 “stealth canisters” in three locations on the roof and painted to match the building. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured 10’ X 11’ fenced area in the alley behind the store to the east. The Antennae would be visible from the street, parking areas, and from surrounding buildings; the equipment on the ground will be visible from Lewis Street when looking down the alley. (5)Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The proposed cellular equipment will create no fumes, dust or noise during normal operations. Cellular facilities have been located throughout the community in residential, commercial and industrial zones without generating any complaints received by the City. (6)Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposal is required to be designed by a professional engineer to withstand the forces of nature. The applicant is also required by law to coordinate with the FAA and FCC prior to obtaining a building permit. Radio waves at frequencies utilized by local cellular networks have not been proven to be harmful to human health. Federal law prohibits the City from considering the impacts of radio wave frequencies when reviewing permits for cellular equipment. TENTATIVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to Parcel #112-253-124; 2) The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the elevations and site plan submitted with the application except as conditioned herein; Page 271 of 368 6 3) The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; 4) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed Sprint Spectrum antennae and equipment proposal, and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the September 20, 2018 meeting. Page 272 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-008SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 273 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-008SITE0 100 200 300 400 500FeetPage 274 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-0080 100 200 300 400 500FeetMixedRes.CommercialVacantVacantIndustrialMixedComm/ResCommercialMixed Res.SFDUsMixed Res.CommH2OPlantSFDUsComm.SITECommPage 275 of 368 ZoningMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-0080 100 200 300 400 500FeetR-2C-1C-3I-1C-1R-2R-2R-2C-1R-1SITEC-1R-2R-3C-3C-3Page 276 of 368 Template Version: 4:3GBED1.2Version Date: 01/05/16©2016 Sprint. This information is subject to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Sprint and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted, confidential or privileged materials intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure is prohibited without authorization.6Sprint Proprietary and Confidential InformationSE90XC383 Fiesta Foods 115 S 10thAveLegendProposed NewSitesExistingOnAirSiteCurrent 1900LTECoverageProposed1900LTECoverageCurrent 1900 LTE Coverage – PascoProposed 1900 LTE Coverage – Pasco Page 277 of 368 REGION MAP SnE ·-Ji. ""a AERIAL MAP OIRECTIOtJS FROM SPOKANE: DEPART W AIRPORT OR TOWARD W AJRPORT OR BEAR LEFT >no THEN TURt.J LEFT or.JTO w AIRPORT OR ~JRIJ RIGHT ONTO S SPOTTED RD rnRtJ LEFT OtJTO W FUGHTl.Jt.JE BLVD ROAO t.Wo1E C..W~GES TO S GROVE RO TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR 1-90 WEST TOWARD SEAffiE AT El'\IT 220. TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR •JS-395 SOUTH TO'l'fARO PASCO KEEP STRAIGHT ONTO WA-397 S TURl'J RIGHT ONTO E A ST ROAD t.W11E CHM'JGES TO W A ST TURN RIGHT OtJTO S 10TH AVE ARRNE AT S IOTH AVE JURISDICTION COMPLIANCE ALL WORK SHllU.. BE PERf'ORMEO Ar.JO MATERW..S ll'JSTAU.£0 lf.J olOOOROAtJCE Yl1TH THE CURRENT EDITIOIJS or THE fOLLCll>'ltJG CODES AS M>OPTEO BY THE LOCM. GOYERNIHG A.VTHORITIES. t.JOTHU.JG IN THESE PlAt.JS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK t.JOT COr.Jf"OAlltn.JC TO THESE CODES. 1. 2015 U.JTERNATIOl'JAL 8UllDU.JC CODE 2. AJ.JSl/TIA-222 STRUCTURAL STAtJOARO 3. t.JFP'A 780 -LIGHTHUJG PROlECTIOl'J CODE 4, 201S NATIONAL ELECTRIC<l. COOE @ CALL WASHINGTON ONECllLL (800) 424-SSSS CAIL! WOllKING DA~ BBl'Olll YOU DIG! THE UTILITIES AS SHOWN Ol'J THIS SET Of" ORAWlf.JCS WERE DEVELOPED FROM THE ll'JFORMA.TIOtJ AVAILA8L£. THE ll'Jf'ORMil.TIOtJ PRO'YIDED IS NOT IMPLIED tJOR ltJTENDED TO &E THE COMPLETE IHVEJ'nORY OF UTILITIES lt.J THIS AAEA IT IS THE COHTAACTOR'S AESPONSl81UTY TO VERIFY THE LOCATION Of" & UTILITIES (WHETHER SHOWl'J OR !'JOT) At.JO PROTECT SAID UTILITIES FROM AtJY QAUAGE CAUSED BY COHTRA.CTOR•s ACllVffiES. PROJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD EXPANSION SITE NAME: FIESTA FOODS SITE NUMBER: SP90XC383-A SITE ADDRESS: 115 SOUTH 1 OTH AVENUE PASCO, WA 99301 JURISDICTION: FRANKLIN SITE TYPE: 27' ROOFTOP SIT! SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY: ZONING JURISDICTION: POWER COMPANY: AAY PROVIDER: INFORMATION 115 SOUTH 10TH AVEl'JUE PASCO, WA 99301 FFi'At.JKUf.J FFAt.JKUf.J FRAt.JUf'J PUO TBD TBD BUILDING OWNER: 111) STRUCTURE INFORMATION: LATITUDE: 4e 13' 41.5992" <I {t¥-O 63) -Ml.228222' LONGITUDE: 119' S' S9.9994"W (NAO eJ} _, 19.100000' GROUND ELEVATIOl'I: 380' STRUCTURE HEICHT: 27' AGL STRUCTURE TYPE: ROOflOP ANTENtlA CENTERLINE: J5' AGL APPLICANT: SPR1tJT 6580 SPRlf.JT PARKWAY OVERLAt.JO PARK, KS 86251 SPRINT COHTACT: LAURA BERTEWITTI HEE No. T -1 I TITLE SHEET DRAWING INDEX SHEET TITLE Z-1 IMl'ALL SITE PWI Z-2 ISITE PLAH 2-3 IELEVATIOr.J REV I PLAt.JS PREPARED f'OR:------ lllllOl!ptlt,..._ > °Sprlnt PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR: ··~·~ 800 I. DOUGtAll RQlll. 1!h R.OCI\ cow. GAllJlll, R. 31134 PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR: ' <IZOWllllA-1» -.co--.01 ... Hilla _h __ _ PL.At.JS PREPARED B'f: T"-==.~-T...------HIGINEERllJG UCEIJSE:------ D•TE I Irr I REVI (DS RNE> ow.1slrwl 1 IW_J_CD_~_llf\CCI o;1118 I "I o LAURA BERTEWITTIOSPRllJT.COM [ APPLlc.>J'IT SITE t.WdE: MASTEC CONTACT: CHRISTirlE tAl'lDEl'l CHRISTiflE.WIOE<l@h\o\STEC.COM FIESTA FOODS I PHOf~E: 949 • .362.8811 MASTEC Ch!: SEN• t....CEOTTE ~~:.:~~~!~~lj=COOM r··LIOOIT SITE CASCADE: 1 OVALS I PROJ£CT INtoRMATIOH COHSULTING TEAM SP90XC383-A SIGHER CONSTRUCTION t.iA.tlAGER OPERATIOtlS t.IAl'IACER RF EHGINEER LAtU>LDRO SIGNATURE I DATE I • it1STALL (l) CABtrlET I I rSITE, DORESS: AkE FIRM: • INSTALL (1) CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAO • IHSTA!.L (l) 800/1901) MH2 ANTEtJt~ • INST/.J..L ()) MIMO AtJTENNA.5 • INSTALL (3) 800 MHz RRUs • ll'JSTALL (3) 1900 MHz RRUa • IHSTALL (6) STEALTH AfJIDJt~ SECTOR TRIPOD MOUl'JTS • INSTALL (4) HlBRID CABLES PROJECT IAAt<P.GERS: T-SQUARED SITE SERVICES, LLC 2500 HICHLAt.JO ROAD, SUITE 201 HERt.IITACE, PA, 16148 (724) 308-7855 HOSS COt.JSULTING 420 W. S1H AVENUE OEr./l/ER, 00 80204 303 . .324.0749 corJTACT: ED W.CltJl'J 208.530.9139 11$ S001H 101H A Vl!NUB PASCO, WA99301 owG INFORt1'A ION: OPAWN B'f: DI CHECKED Br: G'llC Page 278 of 368 STRUcruRE INFORMAT10N IS SHOWN FOR IU.USTRA.llVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUC'T\JRAL ll'llmRrTY OF SUPPORTING STRUCTURES, ANTENNA MOUNTS, AND FOUNDATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ~ ACCEPT.ABLE BY AN ENGINEER CERTIFIED STRUC1'\JRAL ANALY'SlS, UTILIZING THE NEW LOMING REPRESENTED WITlllN TllESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO THE ElCECUTION OF EQUIPMENT CHANGES CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS. CO~OR S~LL OBTAIN AILL STRUCTURAL REPORTS AND FOLLOW AILL RECOMMENDATIONS. llCTU~ EOUIPMENT LOCATIONS MAY SUGHTlY V/!RY 6'\SED ON FlNAL STRUCT\JRAL ANALYSIS. EJCISTIN~ PROPERTY UNE . > . ,/ I I \ \_ . -- Q "'lb ~; ~ '-..._ROOF AREA----....... '\_ -- a Q . -- __.. _--. _..-~ISTING PROPERrTY UNE OVERALL SITE PIAN ~ _... --. ISTING BUllDING ) -~ --W~SIW.TH CN8IDI (SlrAL...-IWlllED TO -EXllRIOR llADINCI) ' 4 1/32" = 1·-0· PLANS PREPARED FOR'------. 8580Sprl'ltPskwoy ~ ~5j;;i~t, Pl.ANS PREPARED FOR: "'--- llOOS. DOUGLAS RCWJ, 121hR.OOR CORAL GABLES, A. 33134 Pl.ANS PREPARED FOR: I .uow..,Awn• O.W.r1 CO ID2D4 llOUM.07• HOii -.--........ PLANiS PREPARED : __ ...,,, ... HBM'T-PA MUAI ---ENGINEERING LICENSE'------. DRAWING NaTICE' n18'EOOOJMIWISMEOO•IU1BrflW.AM)MEM50tl Pll:flm' Cl' .... JIT .Mii MATNDTalE'MDJCID, DIBMIMTBJCI IEllllmanliDwmtCJUllltt:Ell'llSIWlllTli•aJN51111TCF .. Mr, SUBMITTALS: DESCRIPTION DATE I BY I REVI CDS E\IEl m.:m.1e I TM IS&EllRltRE\'IEI 0!.15.111 TM I D r··PU;;;:E,FOODS 1 r·PPUCAN~~~~;~3-A I r SITE ADDRESS: 11S sourn lOTIIAVENUE PASCO, WA 99301 r SHEET DESCR;~ SITE PLAN I DWG INFORMA ON' r SHEET NUMBER' l ~:~EDBY~: : z -1 Page 279 of 368 STRUcruRE INFORMAT10N IS SHOWN FOR IU.USTRA.llVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUC'T\Jf!llL ll'llmRrTY OF SUPPORTING STRUCTURES, ANTENNA MOUNTS, AND FOUNDATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ~ ACCEPT.ABLE BY AN ENGINEER CERTIFIED STRUC1'\JRAL ANALY'SlS, UTILIZING THE NEW LOMING REPRESENTED WITlllN lljESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO THE ElCECUTION OF EQUIPMENT CHANGES CONTAINED IN THESE Df!llWINGS. CO~OR S~LL OBTAIN fil STRUCTUf!llL REPORTS AND FOLLOW fil RECOMMENDATIONS. llCTU~ EOUIPMENT LOCATIONS MAY SUGHTlY V/!RY 6'\SED ON FlNAL STRUCT\JRAL ANALYSIS. -.........__ROOF AREA-..........._ _.....--ccwcc.111.£ TMYW/IUBRlllITTlll S!I.L.E'.LA!i 10' lllDIE CHAIN '--QllrE -a.me CIBllEI' U./ \ ~~~1~ --~~1~NT I.EASE \ ~ISTING ·r-PROPER'TY LINE 4 1/2" -1·-0· PLANS PREPARED FOR'------. 8580Sprl'ltPskwoy ~ ~5j;;i~t, Pl.ANS PREPARED FOR: "'--- llOOS. DOUGLAS RCWl, 121hR.OOR CORAL GABLES, A. 33134 Pl.ANS PREPARED FOR: I oUOW ... Awn• O.W.r1 CO ID2D4 llOUM.07• HOii -.--........ PLANiS PREPARED : __ ...,,, ... HBM'T-PA MUAI ---ENGINEERING LICENSE'------. Df!llWING NaTICE' n18'EOOOJMIWISMEOO•IU1BrflW.AM)MEM50tl Pll:flm' Cl' .... JIT .Mii MATNDTalE'MDJCID, DIBMIMTBJCI IEllllmanliDwmtCJUllltt:Ell'llSIWlllTli• aJN51111TCF ... Mr. SUBMITTALS: DESCRIPTION DATE I BY I REVI CDS E\IEl m.:m.1e I TM IS&EllRltRE\'IEI 0!.15.11 I 1M I D r··PU;;;:E,FOODS 1 [APPUCAN~~~~;~3-A I r SITE ADDRESS: 11S sourn lOTIIAVENUE PASCO, WA 99301 Page 280 of 368 STRUcruRE INFORMAT10N IS SHOWN FOR IU.USTRA.llVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUC'T\JRAL ll'llmRrTY OF SUPPORTING STRUCTURES, ANTENNA MOUNTS, AND FOUNDATION SHALL BE VERIFIED ~ ACCEPT.ABLE BY ~N ENGINEER CERTIFIED STRUC1'\JRAL ANALY'SlS, UTILIZING THE NEW LOMING REPRESENTED WITlllN TllESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION OF EQUIPMENT CHANGES CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS. CO~OR S~LL OBTAIN AILL STRUCTURAL REPORTS AND FOLLOW AILL RECOMMENDATIONS. llCTU~ EOUIPMENT LOCATIONS MAY SUGHTlY V/!RY 6'\SED ON FlNAL STRUCT\JRAL ANALYSIS. F F F F El El El El El El El F F F F F PllDl'OllED 9'RINT MM-PDllEIRlill~ -MOUNT W~ STVIi.:!!;! { l1#ISIBI (l'Mlr 1Q llA1Clt) (2 PER IECIOR-4 T0WJ @ \@ ~ fTh F m cg g ~~I I I II II I I I~ $ INSTALL SPRINT ANTENNA C.L D ELEV. 35 -0 AGL '-I" 0 ELEV. Z4'-J"± AGL $ROOF DECK r 0 ELEV. 2Y 1"± AGL GRADE PllllPOllEllSPRllT~ NllEJINA -·~--SlrM.lH CllNl5TER (l'Mlr 1Q llA1Clt) (2PERIEroR-llT0WJ JI\ JI\ 10'"11'-NT~ ~~ WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION ~ F ~ -llllUo llOUllTED EIND -Nill 10 - -Pl'IE MOUNT (2 PER m:MR, I T0WJ INSfALL SPRINT ANTENNA C.L ~ o ELEV. 35 -b AGL TOP OF EXISTING ROOF rl. --,,.. 0 EL.EV. ze'-B"± AGL v '-.ROOF DECK rJ. 0 ELEV. 25°-8•± AGL V PLANS PREPARED FOR'------. 8580Sprl'ltPskwoy ~ ~5j;;i~t, Pl.ANS PREPARED FOR: "'--- llOOS. DOUGLAS RCWJ, 121hR.OOR CORAL GABLES, A. 33134 Pl.ANS PREPARED FOR: I .uow..,Awn• O.W.r1 CO ID2D4 llOUM.07• HOii -.--........ PLANiS PREPARED : __ ...,,, ... HBM'T-PA MUAI ---ENGINEERING LICENSE'------. DRAWING NaTICE' n18'EOOOJMIWISMEOO•IU1BrflW.AM)MEM50tl Pll:flm' Cl' .... JIT .Mii MATNDTalE'MDJCID, DIBMIMTBJCI IEllllmanliDwmtCJUllltt:Ell'llSIWlllTli•aJN51111TCF .. Mr, SUBMITTALS: DESCRIPTION DATE I BY I REVI CDS E\IEl m.:m.1e I TM I 1 IS&EllRltRE\'IEI 0!.15.11 I 1M I D [~PPU;;;:E'FOODS I r·PPUCAN~~~~;~3-A I r SITE ADDRESS: 11S sourn lOTIIAVENUE PASCO, WA 99301 r SHEET DESCRIPTION:=:--! ELEVATIONS I ELEVATIONS DWG INFORM..: ON' [SHEET NUMBER' l I I J/32" -1'-D" I , .: Z-3 Page 281 of 368 Looking NorthPage 282 of 368 Looking NortheastPage 283 of 368 Looking SouthPage 284 of 368 Looking WestPage 285 of 368 SitePage 286 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2018-008 APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum LP HEARING DATE: 08/16/2018 655 Bradford Lane ACTION DATE: 09/20/2018 Idaho Falls, ID 83404 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in a C-1 (Retail Business) Zone 1.PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: The west ½ of block 3 & all of block 4 of Pettit's Addition except a portion deeded to the City (320291) together with all vacated streets & alleys adjoining. General Location: 115 South 10th Avenue (Parcel #112-253-124). Property Size: The parcel is approximately 3 acres; the lease area contains approximately 110 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array consisting of 6 antennae to be mounted at three locations on the roof. 2.ACCESS: The site is accessed from West Lewis Street, West Columbia Street, and South 10th Avenue. 3.UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are currently available to the site. 4.LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Business) and contains a grocery store. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 Commercial/Mixed Residential EAST: C-1 Commercial (Grigg’s) SOUTH: I-1 Fuel Station/Vacant WEST: C-3 Heavy Commerial 5.COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Commercial uses. Goal UF-2 suggests the City ought to maintain land use flexibility in regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. Policy UF-2-A encourages the sound management of all energy and communication utilities through coordination and cooperation dealing with construction of such facilities. Policy UF-2-B encourages the placement of utility substations which are necessary for the surrounding neighborhood. 6.ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Page 287 of 368 2 Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. ANALYSIS Sprint proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array (concealed in canisters painted to match the building) on the roof of the grocery store located on the property listed above. Sprint will also fence off a 10 X 11’ area behind the building in order to house a power meter and fiber optic connection box. No other modifications will be made to the building or property. The PMC special permit review criteria for wireless facilities are written as follows: 25.70.075 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: (1) Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. (2) Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: (a) Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or (b) Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. (3) All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: (a) Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public rights-of-way and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. (b) Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: Page 288 of 368 3 i) Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii) Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii) Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). Commonly, cellular providers locate the equipment cabinets within a fenced area surrounding the base of a pole; in this case the ground-level equipment is proposed to be located behind a sight-obscuring fence in the alley behind the building. Typical neighborhood concerns expressed over proposed cell towers in the past have included fear of electromagnetic radio waves and the unsightliness of tall towers within the neighborhood. Under Federal regulations cities are barred from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers, provided the equipment meets FCC standards. An application for a cell tower cannot be denied based on concern over electromagnetic waves. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned C-1 (Retail Business). 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Commercial uses. 3. The site is approximately 3 acres; the lease area contains approximately 110 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array on the roof. 4. The site contains a grocery store. 5. The store roof deck is 25’8” tall and a parapet at 26’8” with a cupola extending up another 20’ or so at the store’s west entrance. 6. The proposed antennae will be mounted on the roof at three locations inside of 36’ diameter “Stealth canisters” painted to match the current building. 7. Subsequent to the public hearing a slightly shorter microwave dish assembly was added, proposed to be located roughly in the center of the three stealth canister locations on the roof. 8. All municipal utilities currently serve the site. 9. In the C-1 zone cellular facilities may be permitted by special permit provided the tower is either: Page 289 of 368 4 a. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or b. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 10. The proposed antennae are not designed to be attached on the parts of the building that exceed 35’ (i.e., the cupola). The applicant has positioned the canisters further toward the center of the roof, thus obscuring them from view of casual passers-by (see attached mock-up photo). The additional microwave dish assembly will also be positioned so as to be mostly obscured from view. 11. Pasco Municipal Code 25.70.075(3)(a) also specifies that antennae be “screened or camouflaged by employing . . . compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public rights-of-way, and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility.” 12. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured, 10’ X 11’ fenced area in the alley behind the store to the east. 13. Federal regulations bar the City from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers or denying permits based upon concerns over electromagnetic radio waves. 14. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the City should maintain land use flexibility with regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. 15. Cellular equipment creates minimal demands on City infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: (1)Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address cellular equipment. The Comprehensive Plan goal UF-2 and policy UF-2-A discuss the need for sound management and coordination in the location of utilities and community facilities. Policy UT-1-C encourages Page 290 of 368 5 coordination of utility providers’ functional plans with the City’s land use and utility plans to ensure long term service availability. (2)Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed use is a part of the communication network utilized by the general public. The proposed equipment will be located in such a manner so as not to impact other public utilities or services. The proposed use does not require water and sewer. Only one service trip is expected to be generated each month. (3)Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The character of the vicinity is a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial uses. (4)Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The areas on all sides are fully developed with a mix of single-family dwelling units, commercial/office buildings, and industrial uses. The antennae would be located in 6 “stealth canisters” in three locations on the roof and painted to match the building. The canisters would be located far enough back from the edge of the roofline as to hide them from view of most passers-by. A microwave dish antenna was added to the proposal subsequent to the hearing and would be located roughly in the center of the three canister locations. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight- obscured 10’ X 11’ fenced area in the alley behind the store to the east. The Antennae would not be visible from most locations along the street, parking areas, and from surrounding buildings; the equipment enclosure on the ground will be visible from Columbia Avenue when looking down the alley. (5)Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The proposed cellular equipment will create no fumes, dust or noise during normal operations. Cellular facilities have been located throughout the community in residential, commercial and industrial zones without generating any complaints received by the City. (6)Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Page 291 of 368 6 The proposal is required to be designed by a professional engineer to withstand the forces of nature. The applicant is also required by law to coordinate with the FAA and FCC prior to obtaining a building permit. Radio waves at frequencies utilized by local cellular networks have not been proven to be harmful to human health. Federal law prohibits the City from considering the impacts of radio wave frequencies when reviewing permits for cellular equipment. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to Parcel #112-253-124; 2) The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the Modified elevations and site plan submitted with the application; 3) The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; 4) The wireless equipment and all its associated ground equipment and appurtenances must be removed within 90 days of discontinuation; 5) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Sprint Spectrum LP for the location of a rooftop cell phone antenna array and its associated ground equipment at 115 South 10th Avenue (Parcel #112-253-124) with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. Page 292 of 368 1 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 4, 2018 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey B. Adams, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ADDENDUM: Sprint Spectrum Wireless Facility at Fiesta Foods (SP 2018-008; Sprint Spectrum LP) Sprint applied for a Special Permit to place wireless cell antennae on the roof of Fiesta foods, and had submitted three versions of the site plan prior to the public hearing. Since the public hearing Applicant has submitted a fourth site plan (see attached) showing an added microwave antenna, to be located roughly between the three proposed “stealth canisters.” According to the site plan the proposed microwave dish appears shorter than the three stealth canisters and would not add noticeably to the street view of the rooftop equipment. Staff requests the Planning Commission review the addition to see if it represents a substantial alteration of the application. If not it should be seen as part of the recommendation to City Council. Otherwise Applicant shall be required to re-submit the application for another public hearing before the Planning Commission. Page 293 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-008SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 294 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-008SITE0 100 200 300 400 500FeetPage 295 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-0080 100 200 300 400 500FeetMixedRes.CommercialVacantVacantIndustrialMixedComm/ResCommercialMixed Res.SFDUsMixed Res.CommH2OPlantSFDUsComm.SITECommPage 296 of 368 ZoningMapItem: Cell Tower in C-1 Zone (Fiesta Foods)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-0080 100 200 300 400 500FeetR-2C-1C-3I-1C-1R-2R-2R-2C-1R-1SITEC-1R-2R-3C-3C-3Page 297 of 368 Template Version: 4:3GBED1.2Version Date: 01/05/16©2016 Sprint. This information is subject to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Sprint and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted, confidential or privileged materials intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure is prohibited without authorization.6Sprint Proprietary and Confidential InformationSE90XC383 Fiesta Foods 115 S 10thAveLegendProposed NewSitesExistingOnAirSiteCurrent 1900LTECoverageProposed1900LTECoverageCurrent 1900 LTE Coverage – PascoProposed 1900 LTE Coverage – Pasco Page 298 of 368 REGION MAP SnE ·-Ji. ""a AERIAL MAP OIRECTIOtJS FROM SPOKANE: DEPART W AIRPORT OR TOWARD W AJRPORT OR BEAR LEFT >no THEN TURt.J LEFT or.JTO w AIRPORT OR ~JRIJ RIGHT O"TO S SPOTTED RD rnRtJ LEFT OtJTO W FUGHTlmE BLVD ROAO r.w.1E C..W~GES TO s GROVE RO TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR 1-90 WEST TOWARO SEAffiE AT El'\IT 220. TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR •JS-395 SOUTH TO'UARO PASCO KEEP STRAIGHT omo WA-397 s TURl'J RIGHT omo E A ST ROAD t.W11E CHM'JGES TO W A ST TURN RIGHT OtJTO S 10TH AVE ARRNE AT S IOTH AVE JURISDICTION COMPLIANCE ALL WORK SHllU.. BE PERf'ORMEO Ar.JO MATERW..S ll'JSTAU.£0 lf.J olOOOROAtJCE Yl1TH THE CURRENT EDITIOIJS or THE fOLLCll>'ltJG CODES AS M>OPTEO BY THE LOCM. GOYERNIHG A.VTHORITIES. t.JOTHU.JG IN THESE PlAt.JS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK t.JOT COr.Jf"OAlltn.JC TO THESE CODES. 1. 2015 U.JTERNATIOl'JAL 8UllDU.JC CODE 2. AJ.JSl/TIA-222 STRUCTURAL STAtJOARO 3. t.JFP'A 780 -LIGHTHUJG PROlECTIOl'J CODE 4, 201S NATIONAL ELECTRIC<l. COOE @ CALL WASHINGTON ONECllLL (800) 424-SSSS CAIL! WOllKING DA~ BBl'Olll YOU DIG! THE UTILITIES AS SHOWN Ol'J THIS SET Of" ORAWlf.JCS WERE DEVELOPED FROM THE ll'JFORMA.TIOtJ AVAILA8L£. THE ll'Jf'ORMil.TIOtJ PRO'YIDED IS NOT IMPLIED tJOR ltJTENDED TO &E THE COMPLETE IHVEJ'nORY OF UTILITIES lt.J THIS AAEA IT IS THE COHTAACTOR'S AESPONSl81UTY TO VERIFY THE LOCATION Of" & UTILITIES (WHETHER SHOWl'J OR !'JOT) At.JO PROTECT SAID UTILITIES FROM AtJY QAUAGE CAUSED BY COHTRA.CTOR•s ACllVffiES. PROJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD EXPANSION SITE NAME: FIESTA FOODS SITE NUMBER: SP90XC383-A SITE ADDRESS: 115 SOUTH 1 OTH AVENUE PASCO, WA 99301 JURISDICTION: FRANKLIN SITE TYPE: 27' ROOFTOP SIT! SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY: ZONING JURISDICTION: POWER COMPANY: AAY PROVIDER: INFORMATION 115 SOUTH 10TH AVEl'JUE PASCO, WA 99301 FFi'At.JKUf.J FFAt.JKUf.J FRAt.JUf'J PUO TBD TBD BUILDING OWNER: 111) STRUCTURE INFORMATION: LATITUDE: 4e 13' 41.5992" <I {t¥-O 63) -Ml.228222' LONGITUDE: 119' S' S9.9994"W (NAO eJ} _, 19.100000' GROUND ELEVATIOl'I: 380' STRUCTURE HEICHT: 27' AGL STRUCTURE TYPE: ROOflOP ANTENtlA CENTERLINE: J5' AGL APPLICANT: SPR1tJT 6580 SPRlf.JT PARKWAY OVERLAt.JO PARK, KS 86251 SPRINT COHTACT: LAURA BERTEWITTI HEE No. T -1 I TITLE SHEET DRAWING INDEX SHEET TITLE Z-1 IMl'ALL SITE PWI Z-2 ISITE PLAH 2-3 IELEVATIOr.J REV I PLAt.JS PREPARED f'OR:------ lllllOl!ptlt,..._ > °Sprlnt PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR: ·:-MasTec 800 I. DOUGtAll RQlll. 1!h R.OCI\ cow. GAllJlll, R. 31134 PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR: ' <IZOWllllA-1» -.co--.01 ... Hilla _h __ _ PL.At.JS PREPARED B'f: T"-==.~-T...------HIGINEERllJG UCEIJSE:------ D•TE I Irr I REVI .......... c:e.31.131.,..,.1 ' lOS '""" 11a.az.1sl rwl 2 ""'"'"" 11w.1slrwl 1 IW_J_CD_~_llf\CCI o;1118 I "I o LAURA BERTEWITTIOSPRllJT.COM [ APPLlc.>J'IT SITE t.WdE: MASTEC CONTACT: CHRtSTirlE tAl'lDEl'l CHRISTiflE.WIOE<l@h\o\STEC.COM FIESTA FOODS I PHOf~E: 949 • .362.8811 MASTEC Ch!: SEN• t....CEOTTE ~~:.:~~~!~~lj=COOM r··LIOOIT SITE CASCADE: 1 OVALS I PROJ£CT INtoRMATIOH COHSULTING TEAM SP90XC383-A SIGHER CONSTRUCTION t.iA.tlAGER OPERATIOtlS t.IAl'IAGER RF EHGINEER LAtU>LDRO SIGNATURE I DATE I • '"STALL (l) CABtflET I I rSITE, DORESS: • ll'JSTA!.L (1) CONCRETE EQUIPMENT PAO • IHSTA!.L (l) 800/1901) MH2 ANTEtJt-!AS • INST/.J..L ()) MIMO AtJTENNA.5 • ll'JSTA!.L (3) 800 MH2 RRUs • ll'JSTALL (3) 1900 MH2 RRUa • IHSTALL (1) 2.' LCICROWi'.VE DISH • INSTALL (4) Hl'BRIO CABLES • ll'JSTALL (6) t.JOt.J-PEt.JETRAlU.JC TRIPOO AtJTENt.ito. MOUtJTS • ll'JSTALL (1) t.JOtJ-PEt.JETRATitJC TRIPOD MICROWAVE MOUt./T • ALL At./TENtJ.\S. RRU~ AtJO ASSOCIAlEO EQUIPMEl'JT TO BE PAlt./TED TO MATCH BUILDltJC EXTERIOR AkE FIRM: PROJECT IAAt<P.GERS: T-SQUARED SITE SERVICES, LLC 2500 HICHLAt.JO ROAD, SUITE 201 HERt.IITACE, PA, 16148 (724) 308-7855 HOSS COt.JSULTING 420 W. S1H AVENUE OEr./l/ER, 00 80204 303 . .324.0749 cor.JTACT: ED W.CltJl'J 208.530.9139 11$ S001H 101H A Vl!NUB PASCO, WA99301 owG INFORt1'A ION: OPAWN B'f: DI CHECKED Br: G'llC Page 299 of 368 STRUCTURE INFORM.\TION IS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUCTURAL IHTEGRIT'f' Of" SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. ANTENNA MOUNTS. ANO FOUNDATION SHALL BE \'ERIFIED AS ACCEPTABLE B'f ~n EHClt.JEER CERTIFlEO STRUCTUR.\L N.W.YSIS. VTIUZU.JC THE t.JEW LOADING REPRESEf./TEO WITHU.J THESE OR.l.Wlf'JGS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTIOtJ OF EQUIPMEtJT CH'J'JGES CONTAlf.JEO ll'J THESE OAAWltJCS. COl'JTRACTOR SK'd.L OBT>Jf'J All STRUCTURAL REPORTS NJO f"OLLOW ALL RECOUMEHOATIOt.JS. ACTUAL EQ•JIPMEIJT LO()l>.TIONS MAY SLIGHTLY VA~ BASED ON m.w_ STRUCTIJR.lt. ..V~Al. l"SIS. EXIST It.JG~ PROPERTY Ll"E . > .. .-.. ,,-. ,,-· I I I \ \._ .. PROPOSED SPRltJT tJOl'J-PEtJTETRATll'JG· ,llfffft.JNA. Mourn W/Je·o ST(ALTH CAt.JISTER {STEAL THU.JC PAltJTED TO MATCH EXTERIOR BUILDING} . .-.-··\ \ ,,,-· \..... _,.,,-l(ISTitJC PROPERTY UtJE OVERAii SITE' Pl AH ~ .. -ib ~~ ~··~·· .~·· PROPOSED SPRll'JT 2' MICROWAVE DISH MOUl'JTEO Ol'J A f.JOtJ-PEf.JETRATitJC TRI-POD MOUl'JT ROPOSED SPRU./T f.JOtJ-PEtJTETR.l,TINC NJTEf.Jl'JA MOUNT W/36•o STEALTH CAt.JISTER (STEAL THU.JG PA.ltJTED TO M~TCH EXTERIOR 9UllDU.JC) \.~ \ ... ~ __ j EXISTll'JC 8UllDU.JC + 1(J2· = 1 '-0" PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR:------ lllllOl!ptlt,..._ > Sprint PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR: ·:-MasTec 800 I. DOUGtAll RQlll. 1!h R.OCI\ cow. GAllJlll, R. 31134 PLAt.JS PREPARED f'OR: ' <IZOWllllA-1» -.co--.,,,. 111111 _h __ _ PL.At.JS PREPARED 8Y: .. ___ ama .. ~~ -==::.=" ---EHGINEERU.JG UCEHSE::------ SUSMITTALS; DESCRIPTIOt.J DATE 9Y REVI I I .......... C8.31.13 ,,. ' lD5 '""" 118.CrZ.18 .. ' """'"" llUUI .. 1 IS9JCD_~_llf\CCI 05.15.18 .. ' r••u;;;::FOODS I [APPL100;~;;~~3-A I rSITE .MlDRESS: US S001H lOlH A Vl!NUB PASOO, WA 99301 crttG l"FOR"I< IOI<: [SHEET r<UM6ER: l g~~~:~= ! Z-1 Page 300 of 368 STRUCTURE INFORM.\TION IS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUCTURAL IHTEGRIT'f' Of" SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. ANTENNA MOUNTS. ANO FOUNDATION SHALL BE \'ERIFIED AS ACCEPTABLE B'f ~n EHClt.JEER CERTIFlEO STRUCTUR.\L N.W.YSIS. VTIUZU.JC THE t.JEW LOADING REPRESEf./TEO WITHU.J THESE OR.l.Wlf'JGS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTIOtJ OF EQUIPMEtJT CH'J'JGES COHTAlf.JEO ll'J THESE OAAWltJCS. COl'JTRACTOR SK'd.L OBT>Jf'J All STRUCTURAL REPORTS NJO f"OLLOW ALL RECOUMEHOATIOt.JS. ACTUAL EQ•JIPMEIJT LO()l>.TIONS MAY SLIGHTLY VA~ BASED ON m.w_ STRUCTIJR.lt. ..V~Al. l"SIS. EXIST It.JG~ PROPERTY Ll"E . > .. .-.. ,,-. ,,-· I I I \ \._ .. . .-.-··\ \ ,,,-· \..... _,.,,-l(ISTitJC PROPERTY UtJE OVERAii SITE' Pl AH ~ .. -ib ~~ ,.,,-··~·· .,.,,-·· ROPOSED SPRlf./T 2' MICROWAVE DISH MOUt-rnD Ot.J A tJOl'J-PEf.JETRATING TRI-POD MOUfJT \.~ \ ... ~ __ j EXISTll'JC 8UllDU.JC + 1(J2· = 1 '-0" PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR:------ lllllOl!ptlt,..._ > Sprint PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR: ·:-MasTec 800 I. DOUGtAll RQlll. 1!h R.OCI\ cow. GAllJlll, R. 31134 PlAt.JS PREPARED f'OR: ' <IZOWllllA-1» -.co--.,,,. 111111 _h __ _ PL.At.JS PREPARED 8Y: .. ___ ama .. ~~ -==::.=" ---EHGINEERU.JG UCEHSE::------ SUSMITTALS; OESCRIPTIOt.J DATE 9Y REVI I I .......... C8.31.13 ,,. ' lD5 '""" 118.CrZ.18 .. ' """'"" llUUI .. 1 IS9JCD_~_llf\CCI 05.15.18 .. ' r••u;;;::FOODS I [APPL100;~;;~~3-A I rSITE .MlORESS: US S001H lOlH A Vl!NUB PASOO, WA 99301 crttG l"FOR"I< IOI<: [SHEET r<UM6ER: l g~~~:~= ! Z-1 Page 301 of 368 STRUCTURE INFORM.\TION IS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUCTURAL IHTEGRIT'f' Of" SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. ANTENNA MOUNTS. ANO FOUNDATION SHALL BE \'ERIFIED AS ACCEPTABLE B'f ~n EHClt.JEER CERTIFlEO STRUCTUR.\L N.W.YSIS. VTIUZU.JC THE t.JEW LOADING REPRESEf./TEO WITHU.J THESE OR.l.Wlf'JGS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTIOtJ OF EQUIPMEtJT CH'J'JGES COHTAlf.JEO ll'J THESE OAAWltJCS. COl'JTRACTOR SK'd.L OBT>Jf'J All STRUCTURAL REPORTS NJO f"OLLOW ALL RECOUMEHOATIOt.JS. ACTUAL EQ•JIPMEIJT LO()l>.TIONS MAY SLIGHTLY VA~ BASED ON m.w_ STRUCTIJR.lt. ..V~Al. l"SIS. ...______ROOF AAEA----- _. COM Qlllll£ 11W( ·~ IW11IO ~oor AREA--- Sll£..B.Ali ttY'llllE-1.MOllll: \ \ \ ~XISTIIJG \----PROPERIT Ur.Jf: + 112· = 1'-0" PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR:------ lllllOl!ptlt,..._ > Sprint PL.At.JS PREPARED f'OR: ·:-MasTec 800 I. DOUGtAll RQlll. 1!h R.OCI\ cow. GAllJlll, R. 31134 PlAt.JS PREPARED f'OR: ' <IZOWllllA-1» -.co--.,,,. 111111 _h __ _ PL.At.JS PREPARED 8Y: .. ___ ama .. ~~ -==::.=" ---EHGINEERU.JG UCEHSE::------ SUSMITTALS; OESCRIPTIOt.J OATE 9Y REVI I I .......... C8.31.13 ,,. ' lD5 '""" 118.CrZ.18 .. ' """'"" OUUI .. 1 IS9JCD_~_llf\CCI 05.15.18 .. ' r••u;;;::FOODS I [APPL100;~;;~~3-A I rSITE .MlC>RESS: US S001H lOlH A Vl!NUB PASCO, WA 99301 owG INFORt1'A ION: OPAWH Br: DI CHECKED Br: Oii;, Page 302 of 368 STRUCTURE INFORM.\TION IS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUCTURAL IHTEGRIT'f' Of" SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. ANTENNA MOUNTS. ANO FOUNDATION SHALL BE \'ERIFIED AS ACCEPTABLE B'f ~n EHClt.JEER CERTIFlEO STRUCTUR.\L N.W.YSIS. VTIUZU.JC THE t.JEW LO.t.OINC REPRESEt./TEO WITHU.J THESE DR.l.Wlf'JGS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTIOtJ OF EQUIPMEtJT CH'J'JGES COHTAlf.JEO ll'J THESE OAAWltJCS. COl'JTRACTOR SK'd.L OBT>Jf'J All STRUCTURAL REPORTS NJO f"OLLOW ALL RECOUMEHOATIOt.JS. ACTUAL EQ•JIPMEIJT LO()l>.TIONS MAY SLIGHTLY VA~ BASED ON m.w_ STRUCT•JR.lt. ..V~Al. l"SIS. -=-~-~':' $ ll'JSTAU. SPRll'JT HJTEt.Jl'JA C.L. 0 El.£V. 35 o :t Ml I\ TOP Of fXISTIHG ROOF ~ =~~~~;:·-e•:t AGL r ~ (S'IDUIN IWNn:D 'IO --~ p p -~ ""'1ilM llOUllT W/W'f ~'IH CMl!D (flW.1Hlll ~ 10 __ __, ~!PDP p $ @ ELEV. 25 -s•± AGL BBBBBBB -r---ONA-1BE-~- w ;=; p p V'-..1 ~ ® qn p p p PL.At.JS PREPARED FOR:------ lllllOl!ptlt,..._ > Sprint PL.At.JS PREPARED FOR: ·:-MasTec 800 I. DOUGtAll RQlll. 1!h R.OCI\ cow. GAllJlll, R. 31134 PLAt.JS PREPARED FOR: ' <IZOWllllA-1» -.co--.,,,. 111111 _h __ _ PL.At.JS PREPARED 8Y: .. ___ ama .. ~~ -==::.=" ---EHGINEERU.JG UCEHSE::------ m 1\ A n11111 11111~ WEST ELEVATION __ r __ _, litOllf1EIQllA~I --~-:.n.~ CIHBTB (lmll.-IWf1!P 111 $ INSTM..L SPRltJT Af./TEl'HJI\ C.L @ ELEV. .>5 -0 :t AGL ~ TOP OF EXISTING ROOF qr :~~~~~to"± l<lL r $ @ ELEV. 23 -1'± ACL lllllM1. ,. llOll --I UllC FECE .,_-----....J -EITElllCll ...._, ~ h "· A r ~ -· -~ -llUCT .,... mN.lM -(ll!lli.--111 llM10! -aa-> /'--..... rn ~Fi'AWlf~G t.JOTICE: COG.liMllWCl:Wl:llllTW.NltlWMG.lllfill»lm' Alll!M'NOT•~~'IWOI. wmt:M'rt1€--.W'll'TTDlt:OMaTCIF..-r. SUSMITTALS; OESCRIPTIOt.J .......... lD5 '""" DATE I BY I REVI c:e.31.13 I .iYl'I 3 11a.crz.1sl rwl 2 I"""'"" I '..,..\'I "'I ' IS9JCD!'MPUCCI 05.15.18 DI 0 r••u;;;::FOODS I ON 1llP I [APPL100;~;;~~3-A I L ____________________ _J.lJ __________________ ..1.......1.--'~------------, rSITE .MlC>RESS: NORTH ELEVATION ~1"Sf'MITLDIE ND US S001H lOlH A Vl!NUB PASOO, WA 99301 rHEET OES=~TIONS I crttG l"FOR"I< IOI<: [SHEET r<UM6ER: l I I I o•~"Erf: .. z 3 3/32• = 1 '-o• 1 CHECKED Ert: O<C -ELEYAI!ONS Page 303 of 368 AntennasAreNOTVisibleFromInsideTheRedCircles123Page 304 of 368 Modified Elevation Looking EastPage 305 of 368 Looking NorthPage 306 of 368 Looking NortheastPage 307 of 368 Looking SouthPage 308 of 368 Looking WestPage 309 of 368 SitePage 310 of 368 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 8/16/2018 F. Special Permit Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in a C-1 Zone (Sprint Spectrum LP) (MF# SP 2018- 008) Chairman Myhrum read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit application for the location of wireless communication facilities in a C -1 zone. The proposed location is the Fiesta Food Grocery Store. He briefly went over three different stealth options that the Commission could consider with graphics presented on the overhead. Ed Maginn, Hoss Consulting, Idaho Falls, ID spoke on behalf of the applicant. The three options for the antennae were a result of City Staff, an engineer hired by Sprint and Hoss Consulting to see what options would be supported by the existing structure. They went with the option that wasn’t the best for coverage, however, it was the better option for the building and for the community and the most stealth. Stephen Bauman, 7114 Maxim Court, spoke in favor of the application. He said that he appreciated how the company was presenting this application and how they are operating. Commissioner Bykonen discussed the fact that the majority of people have cell phones – often multiple cell phones per home. Cell towers are inevitable and unavoidable. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, to close the hearing on the proposed Sprint Spectrum antennae and equipment proposals, and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the September 20, 2018 meeting. The motion passed unanimously with Commissioner J. Campos recused. Page 311 of 368 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/20/2018 B. Special Permit Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in a C-1 Zone (Sprint Spectrum LP) (MF# SP 2018- 008) Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit application for the location of wireless communication facilities in a C-1 zone, pointing out one change in the design of the equipment since the previous hearing. The equipment will include a microwave dish rather than the originally proposed cell array and will be less visible than the original design that was submitted. There was dialogue between Chairperson Roach, Commissioner Portugal and staff on the design of the array and then special permitting process moving forward pertaining to the memo that was included in the staff report. Mr. White replied that the array will be smaller and less visible and that there is an option to reopen the public hearing for the new design although that was not recommended by staff. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Sprint Spectrum LP for the location of a rooftop cell phone antenna array and its associated ground equipment at 115 South 10 th Avenue (Parcel # 112-253-124) with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Page 312 of 368 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council September 26, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 10/1/18 FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-S-1 Zone (MF# SP 2018-009) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Reports to Planning Commission Dated: 08/16/2018 and 09/20/2018 Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 08/16/2018 and 09/20/2018 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.____, granting a special permit for the location of wireless communication facilities at 5304 Burden Boulevard. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On August 16, 2018 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend approval for the location of wireless communication facilities at 5304 Burden Boulevard (Parcel #117-330-067). Wireless Communication facilities are regulated in the City by Pasco Municipal Code 25.70.075, as follows: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: 1. Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts Page 313 of 368 provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. 2. Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: a. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty- five (35) feet; or b. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 3. All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: a. Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/ or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public rights- of-way, and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. b. Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: i. Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii. Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii. Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). c) If an applicant chooses to construct a new freestanding wireless communication facility, the burden of proof shall be on the applicant to show a wireless communication facility located on a higher order of preference site cannot reasonably be accommodated. The city reserves the right to retain a qualified consultant, at the applicant’s expense, to review the supporting documentation for accuracy. 4. All applications for building permits must be accompanied by verification of approval by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and any other state or federal requirements for tower design and location. Additionally all tower construction plans must be designed and stamped by a licensed professional engineer. 5. All wireless communication facilities shall be removed by the facility owner within 6 months of the date the facility ceases to be operational or if the facility falls into disrepair. Following the conduct of a public hearing the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to allow for the location of the Wireless Communication Facilities, and recommend approval of the special permit with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation was received. V. DISCUSSION: Page 314 of 368 Sprint proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array concealed in a raised steeple tower of a church structure located at 5304 Burden Boulevard. Sprint will also fence off an 11’ X 16’ area just adjacent to the HVAC unit on the south side of the church structure in order to house a power meter and fiber optic connection box. The proposed antennae would be located in the steeple tower, which would be raised an additional 6’ on the north (front) side of the building and would be designed and painted to match existing building. Page 315 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 75 150 225 300 375FeetPage 316 of 368 RESOLUTION NO._______ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE FOR THE LOCATION OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES AT 5304 BURDEN BOULEVARD. WHEREAS, Sprint Spectrum LP submitted an application for the location of a Wireless Communication Facilities at 5304 Burden Boulevard (Parcel #117-330-067); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on August 16, 2018 to review a Special Permit for the proposed Wireless Communication Facilities; and, WHEREAS, following deliberations on September 20, 2018 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Special Permit for location of the Wireless Communication Facilities with certain conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: 1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to Sprint Spectrum LP for Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-S-1 Zoning district under Master File #SP 2018-009 with the following conditions: a. The special permit shall apply to parcel #117-330-067; b. The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the approved elevations and site plan; c. The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; d. The wireless equipment and all its associated ground equipment and appurtenances must be removed within 90 days of discontinuation. e. The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. 2. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1st day of October, 2018. _______________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ _____________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 317 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2018-009 APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum LP HEARING DATE: 08/16/2018 655 Bradford Lane ACTION DATE: 09/20/2018 Idaho Falls, ID 83404 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-S-1 (Suburban District) Zone 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Short Plat 2005-02, LOT 2 General Location: 5304 Burden Boulevard (Parcel #117-330-067). Property Size: The parcel is approximately 1 acre; the lease area contains approximately 176 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array to be built inside a raised steeple. 2. ACCESS: The site is accessed from Burden Boulevard. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are currently available to the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned R-S-1 (Suburban District) and contains a church. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-1 SFDUs EAST: R-S-1 SFDUs SOUTH: R-S-1 SFDUs WEST: R-1 SFDUs 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Residential uses. Goal UF-2 suggests the City ought to maintain land use flexibility in regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. Policy UF-2-A encourages the sound management of all energy and communication utilities through coordination and cooperation dealing with construction of such facilities. Policy UF-2-B encourages the placement of utility substations which are necessary for the surrounding neighborhood. Page 318 of 368 2 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. ANALYSIS Sprint Wireless Sprint proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array concealed in a raised steeple tower of a church structure located at 5304 Burden Boulevard. Sprint will also fence off an 11’ X 16’ area just adjacent to the HVAC unit on the south side of the church structure in order to house a power meter and fiber optic connection box. The proposed antennae would be located in the steeple tower, which would be raised an additional 6’ on the north (front) side of the building and would be designed and painted to match existing building. The PMC special permit review criteria for wireless facilities are written as follows: 25.70.075 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: (1) Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. (2) Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: (a) Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or (b) Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. (3) All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: (a) Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public Page 319 of 368 3 rights-of-way and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. (b) Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: i) Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii) Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii) Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). Commonly, cellular providers locate the equipment cabinets within a fenced area surrounding the base of a pole; in this case the ground-level equipment is proposed to be located behind a sight-obscuring fence adjacent the HVAC unit behind the building. The screening must meet design requirements of the I-182 Overlay District (PMC 25.58). Typical neighborhood concerns expressed over proposed cell towers in the past have included fear of electromagnetic radio waves and the unsightliness of tall towers within the neighborhood. Under Federal regulations cities are barred from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers, provided the equipment meets FCC standards. An application for a cell tower cannot be denied based on concern over electromagnetic waves. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned R-S-1 (Suburban District). 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Low-Density Residential uses. 3. The site is approximately 1 acre; the lease area contains approximately 176 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array to be built inside an extended height steeple tower. 4. The site contains a church structure. 5. The proposed antennae will be mounted inside a steeple tower which would be raised an additional 6’ and designed and painted to match the current building. 6. All municipal utilities currently serve the site. Page 320 of 368 4 7. In the R-S-1 zone cellular facilities may be permitted by special permit provided the tower is either: i. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or ii. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 8. The proposed cellular antennae will be mounted inside an existing 37’ church steeple tower which would be raised an additional 6.’ 9. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured 11’ X 16’ fenced area just adjacent to the HVAC unit on the south side of the church structure. 10. Federal regulations bar the City from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers or denying permits based upon concerns over electromagnetic radio waves. 11. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the City should maintain land use flexibility with regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. 12. Cellular equipment creates minimal demands on City infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address cellular equipment. The Comprehensive Plan goal UF-2 and policy UF-2-A discuss the need for sound management and coordination in the location of utilities and community facilities. Policy UT-1-C encourages coordination of utility providers’ functional plans with the City’s land use and utility plans to ensure long term service availability. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed use is a part of the communication network utilized by the general public. The proposed equipment will be located in such a manner so as not to impact other public utilities or services. The Page 321 of 368 5 proposed use does not require water and sewer. Only one service trip is expected to be generated each month. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The character of the vicinity is dominated by single-family dwelling units on all sides. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The areas on all sides are fully developed with single-family dwelling units. The antennae will be located on an existing church structure inside an existing steeple tower which would be raised an additional 6’ and designed and painted to match the building. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured 11’ X 16’ fenced area just adjacent to the HVAC unit on the south side of the church structure. The Antennae and equipment will likely not be noticeable from any surrounding properties. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The proposed cellular equipment will create no fumes, dust or noise during normal operations. Cellular facilities have been located throughout the community in residential, commercial and industrial zones without generating any complaints received by the City. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposal is required to be designed by a professional engineer to withstand the forces of nature. The applicant is also required by law to coordinate with the FAA and FCC prior to obtaining a building permit. Radio waves at frequencies utilized by local cellular networks have not been proven to be harmful to human health. Federal law prohibits the City from considering the impacts of radio wave frequencies when reviewing permits for cellular equipment. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to parcel #117-330-067; 2) The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the approved elevations and site plan; Page 322 of 368 6 3) The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; 4) The wireless equipment and all its associated ground equipment and appurtenances must be removed within 90 days of discontinuation. 5) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Sprint Spectrum LP for the location of a concealed rooftop cell phone antenna array and its associated ground equipment located at 5304 Burden Boulevard with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. Page 323 of 368 1 Darcy Bourcier From:Mike Koontz <irondude99301@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 08, 2018 4:03 PM To:Darcy Bourcier Subject:Proposed Cellular Antennae Array at the Christian Science Church I am a home owner who lives in very close proximity to the Christian Science Church. I strongly oppose approving a permit to allow installation of a cellular antennae array in the church steeple. Long term studies have not been done to verify that the electromagnetic waves are not harmful to human health. Additionally there is evidence that shows there is a potential for decreased property values due to the perceived health hazards from exposure to cellular antennae arrays. Understandably I do not want to take on either of these risks. I am very disappointed that the City of Pasco would consider allowing installation of a cellular tower array in a residential area much less want to take on the legal liability for approving this project. I would not live in a home with a cellular antennae array in close proximity to my living and sleeping areas. Sincerely, Michael L. Koontz Resident at 5213 Montpelier Dr., Pasco, WA.Yahoo Mail on Android Page 324 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 325 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 75 150 225 300 375FeetPage 326 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 75 150 225 300 375FeetSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsPage 327 of 368 ZoningMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 75 150 225 300 375FeetR-1R-1R-S-1R-S-1Page 328 of 368 Template Version: 4:3GBED1.2Version Date: 01/05/16©2016 Sprint. This information is subject to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Sprint and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted, confidential or privileged materials intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure is prohibited without authorization.5Sprint Proprietary and Confidential InformationSE90XC142 Christian Science Church 5304 Burden RoadLegendProposed NewSitesExistingOnAirSiteCurrent 1900LTECoverageProposed1900LTECoverageCurrent 1900 LTE Coverage – PascoProposed 1900 LTE Coverage – Pasco Page 329 of 368 REGION MAP --/ ' 0 / 0 *SITE DIRECTIONS DIRECTlmJs FROM SPOKANE AIRPORT: DEPN\T W AIRPORT DR TOW/.RD W AIRPORT DR BEAR LEFT MIO THEN TURN LEFT OrffO W Al RPORT OR 1UArJ RIGHT omo s SPOTTED RD 1\JRrJ LEFT Ot.fl'O W FUGHTLl~J E BL\itl ROAD r.i.iME CH,6,!JGES TO S GROVE RO TM<E RAMP RIGHT FOR 1-90 WEST TOWAAQ S:E.i'.TTLE AT E<IT .220, TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR US-3o;i5 SOIJTH lOWARD PASCO TURN RIGHT ot.fl'CI SELPH LAt~DlrJG RO TURfJ RIGHT TO STAY ON SEl.PH LANDING RD TVRt4 LEFT NlTO TAYLOR FLATS RO ROAD NAME CHM"JGES TC tJ ROAD SS TUR~J LEFT OMTO BUROHJ BLVD ARRIVE AT BUROErJ 8 LVD ON THE RIGHT JURISDICTION COMPLIANCE ML WORK S~ BE PERFORMED AUD rMTER~ !!~STALLED It~ ACCOROHlCE WITH THE CURREt.ff EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES 1'S AOOPlEO l?r' THE L.DCAL GOVER~J lt~G AUTHORITIES. NOTHING l~J TH ESE PLANS IS TO BE O'.lNSTRU ED TO PERMIT WORK tl<lT COtJFORMlljG TO THESE CODES. 1. 201 S I r.JTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2. Ar~Sl(TIA-222 STRUCTUPJ>L STANDARD 3. tJFPA 780 -LIGHTI'J ING PROTECTION CODE 4.. 2.015 rlATlOrlAL El.ECTRI~ com: @ CAU. WASHINGTON ONECML (800) 424-SSSS CAU.1 WOUINGDA'YS lllll'OllE YcnJ DIG! THE lJTILJTl ES "5 SHOWr~ or~ THIS SET OF DRAWINGS WERE DEVELOPED FROM THE l~JFDRMATION AVAILABLE. THE rtJFORMATIDN PROVIDED IS NOT IMPLIED NOR rtJTHlDED TO BE THE CDl.4PLETE lt.JVEtJTORr OF UTILITIES IN THIS I-REA. rr 15 1HE CCf'.JTRACTOR"S RESPOt~SIBIUTY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIOt~ OF & VTI UTIES (WHETHER SHOWN OR ~JOT) AND PROlECT SAID UTILITIES FROM M'ff ~AGE CAUSED BY CONTRAGTOR'S ACTIVrTIES. PROJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD EXPANSION SITE NAME: BURDEN ROAD CHURCH SITE NUMBER: SP90XC142 A SITE ADDRESS: 5304 BURDEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 JURISDICTION: FRANKLIN COUNTY SITE TYPE: 37' ROOFTOP SITE INFORMATION SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY: ZONING JURISDICTION: POWER COMPANY: AAV PROVIDER: PROPERTY OWNER: 5J04 BU ROEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 FOO~Kllt4 FRANKLlrJ COUNTY FRJJ'lKLlrJ UTILITY DEPARTMENT lllD tJ(A ftlllfOiUlfCH ofatmT,ICIEtfl\ST CONTACT: EVAN MEHtm5i\O&, Clli -SW.'7UIOO STRUCTURE INrDRt..IATION: LATITUDE: +s· 16' 13.630B" 1J (rlAD B3) 41;i.2704-.:528" LONGITUDE: 119· g• J<.9992'W (NAD fl.3) -119.15972.!' GROUND ELEVATION: 100• STRUCTURE HEIGHT: 37' AGL STRUCTURE TYPE: ROOFTOP ANTENNA CENTERLINE: 35'-10· AGL APPLICANT: SoRINT 65BD SPRIMT P,&,RKWAY OvERWJD PARK. KS 66251 SPRINT CONTACT: LAURA BEFITELLOTTI LAUAA BERTELLOTllQSPRlr.JT.COM HEETI Ng. T-1 ITITLE SHEET DRAWING INDEX SHEET TITLE Z-1 IOYE!tb.LL SITE PLArJ Z-2. IEQUIPMEJ'ff PL.A!J Z-J IELEYATIOtlS REV PLPNS PREPARED FOR;------. -...-"""""" > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FCIR; ·:-MasTec IXJ 8, IXllJGLAS RtW>. '12111 R.OOR cc.IAI. GAllBI, II. Sl114 PLJ.NS PREP,6,RED FOR: l 4m!Wftl--.co-. -.ir748 HOii -h---..-.. PLJ./"lS PREPARED BY: i -----_ ... _ ---EJ'JCtN EERIHG LICEtJSE: ~tl<lTICE: mrll•ClllR9ftl&Mi..m T'ISICllMOPET MG.,...,.,.. • ........._-.W.m Wl"llDIJTIE~WllllTEll~flfllUIT, SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE BY REV iIJSllUISED 00.113..1! 1M 1 ~ED mt Rr.EW D5.21.1B 1M 0 MASTEC CONTACT: MASTEC CM: fi Af'PUCIMT SITE t<•ME' CH RISTltlE Wl orn CHR1sr1NE.LANorn11MASITC.coM BURDEN ROAD CHURCHI PHotJE~ 'Q4Q_3S2.Bfl11 SE/\lj NAGEOTTE SEAt4.NAGEOTTEi!IMASTEC.C<JM PHONE' 310.910.001' r Af'PUCIWT SITE CA5CAIJL APPROVALS I PROJECT INFORMATION CONSULTING TEAM SP90XCl42A I SIGNER SPRINT CONSTRUCTION MM AGER SPRINT OPERATIONS MANAGER SPRINT RF ENGINEER 1.ANOLORO DDRESS~ SIGNATURE DATE I • 1t<STALL (2) C>.B1.irrs I I rSITE' • ilj5TALL (1) POWER Pl\OTECTOI< C'.BltlET lt4STAU.. (1) TEL.CO C.'\Blt4ET lt4STAL.L (1) H-FR,6,UE • llj5TALL (1) cot•CRETE EQUIPMENT PAD lt4SfAU.. (3) BDD/1900 MHz MlTE!JNAS lfJSTAL.L (3) BOD MHz RAUB • 1r~STAL.l.. (;;,) HIOO MHz RRU::; lt4STA1..L (3) MIMD NHENtlAS ltJSTALL (4) HYBRID CA.Bl.ES llJSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE lr~STAL.l.. AfJDrTIOrl TO EXISTIPJG STEEPLE ME FIRM; PROJECT MANAGERS! T-SOU A RED SITE SEFl\/IC:ES, L.LC 2500 HIGHLAt4D AQ.t.D, SUITE 201 HERMITAGE, PA.. 1S14B (724) 306-7855 HOSS corJSUL lltlG 4~0 W. .5TH AVEtJUE DENVER, CO 8021)4 :!IDJ.J24.074g CQUTACT: ED MAGINU 2.0B.530.'Q 1.39 '304-BUJWBN ROAD PASCO, WA99301 DWG ltJFORM ION: OAAWN Irr; 1)1 CH ECKEO BY: Gl'lt Page 330 of 368 STRUCTURE: INFORMA110N IS SHOWN fOR ILLUSTl?ATJVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUCTURAL IHTEGRrrr OF SUPPORTING STRUCTll RES, ANTE NH A MOUNTS, ANO FDU NDA TION SHALL BE VERIFl ED AS 1'.CCEPTMJLE BY AN mm rJEER CERTIR rn STRUCTUR'iL NJALYSIS, UTILIZING lHE ~JEW LOAf)l~JG REPRESENTED WllHll1 TI-IESE Dl'AWltlGS PRIO~ TO THE EXECVTtON OF ECVIPMEfJT CHAf~GES OONT.aJf~ED IN 'THESE DRAWINGS. OONTR.t\CTOR Sl¥il. OBTAl~l ALL S'mUCTUFW_ REPORTS Nm FOLLOW All. RECOMMErJOATiot~S-ACllJAL EQUIPMEJff LOCATIOtJS tMY SLIGHTLY VAFtr B&SEO ml Fl t.W. STRUCTUR,6,L AtJALYSIS. -' -PROPERTY Llf~E --::--__________ -::1/rnntJG = 0 EXISTl f~G BIJILDUJG· ,~ ~~· b ~I~ 1(7 >o" ~ 0 L'.1.' 1 .. I .. I .. 1 1 .. I .. 1 .. 1 .1. 1 .. I .. I . i I I I J OYERAI I SITE Pl AN 0 I 81 I I EXISTING BUI LOING , .. , .. _.__ _J + 1/1&" = 1'-0" PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. -Sptt"""""" > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FOR; ·:·MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGl.All R(W). 12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PLANS PREP,6,RED FOR: l 4m!Wftl--.co-. ~ HOii -h---..-.. PL>l'lS PREPARED BY: i -----_ ...... ---EJJClN EERING LICEtJSE: mrll•ClllR9ftl&Mi..m T'ISICllMOPET ~NOTICE: MGllM'mr•--....-.wmm Wl"llDIJTIE._MllTEll~flf...,-. SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE BY REV iIJSllUISED 00.113..18 .. , ~ED mt Ar.EW a:i.ll.1B "' ' r:=i:E~~:n CHURCHI [ ~PUCA•;;;o~~~42 A I r SITE ADDRESS' I '304-BUJWllN ROAD PASCO, WA99301 rHEET DESC= 1 DWG HJFOR" ION: [SHEET IJU"BER' l ~~~E~~: ! Z-1 Page 331 of 368 STRUCTURE: INFORMA110N IS SHOWN fOR ILLUSTl?ATJVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUCTURAL IHTEGRrrr OF SUPPORTING STRUCTll RES, ANTE NH A MOUNTS, ANO FDU NDA TION SHALL BE VERIFl ED AS 1'.CCEPTMJLE BY AN mm rJEER CERTIR rn STRUCTUR'iL NJALYSIS, UTILIZING lHE ~JEW LOAf)l~JG REPRESENTED WllHll1 TI-IESE Dl'AWltlGS PRIO~ TO THE EXECVTtON OF ECVIPMEfJT CHAf~GES OONT.aJf~ED IN 'THESE DRAWINGS. OONTR.t\CTOR Sl¥il. OBTAl~l ALL S'mUCTUFW_ REPORTS Nm FOLLOW All. RECOMMErJOATiot~S-ACllJAL EQUIPMEJff LOCATIOtJS tMY SLIGHTLY VAFtr B&SEO ml Fl t.W. STRUCTUR,6,L AtJALYSIS. D'ilSTirJG BUILDJtl~ ,r:.<t¥" ~«· SlILfl.Ali :s1~ ~~ ~"" ·~~ 0 0 .. _ -UICRIU flNJJ.... GONCR CTE PAD PLACEMENT ~UST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION • + 0/1&" = 1'-0" PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. _Sptt........,. > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FOR; ·:·MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGLAll R(W). '12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PLANS PREP,6,RED FOR: l 4m!Wftl--.co-. ~ HOii -h---..-.. PL>l'lS PREPARED BY: i -----_ ...... ---EJJClN EERING LICErJSE: mrll•ClllR9ftl&Mi..m T'ISICllMOPET ~NOTICE: MGllM'mr•--....-.wmm Wl"llDIJTIE._MllTEll~flf...,-. SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE BY REV iIJSllUISED 00.113..18 .. , ~ED mt Ar.EW a:i.ll.1B ... ' r:=i:E~~:n CHURCHI [ ~PUCA•;;;o~~~42 A I r SITE ADDRESS' I '304-BUJWllN ROAD PASCO, WA99301 DWG ltJFORM ION: DAA'ffl'J Irr; 1)1 CH ECKEO BY: Gl'lt Page 332 of 368 smucruRE INFORMATION IS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. SlRUCTIJRAL INTEGRllY DF SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. ANTENNA MOUNTS. ANO FOUNDATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS ACCEPTABLE BY AN ENGINEER CERTIFIED STRUCTIJRAL ANALYSIS, UTILIZING lliE NEW LOADING REPRESENTED WrTHIN THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION OF EQUIPMENT CHANGES CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHA.LL OBTAIN AU.. STRUCTIJRAL REPORTS AND FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS. ACTUAL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS MAY SLIGHTLY VAffr BASED ON FINAL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. INSTllLL SPRllT I' CHMI LINK FENCE II 11 II II 11 II ¢ II 11 II 0000 --t1F IWSED ROOF"' e EUV. 431-11 "'-AOL TOP OF EXISTING ROOF ~ _/ 0 ELEV. J7°-o'± AGL INSTALL SPRi;T ANTENNAS rlo. O ELEV. J5 10 AGL V ..._~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-GRADE EAST ELEVATION 1/4" -1·-0· I IDuDI II I I II I I I I II GRADE NORTH ELEVATION 1/8 " -1·-0 · PLANS PREPARED FOR:----- 8580Sprint Pal1aoay > Owrlor<I Palk, Kansls 116251 Sprint PLANS PREPARED FOR: ·=·MasTec 800 S. DOUGLAS ROAD, 121h R.OOR CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 PLANS PREPARED FOR: i '20WothA_,. O.nwr, CO 802CM 303.J:M.0748 HOSS www.ho .. con.ultlng.com PLANS PREPARED BY: .... ""'HIGHWID-"""'°' -a-HElllUTMLl'A U:UI .,......,_ -~ --ENGINEERING LICENSE:------. DRAWING NOTICE: Tl£Sl DOOJMUfTSAllEa>NADINIW.MDMETlllSOl.L l'ROPEIWf OFSJIAINT AlllO MA.V NOTBf'AElllOOIJCfD, DISISf'MINA.TmOI ltmmtBUTI:DwmtCUTTMf'f»RESSWlllTTINCON!if.HTCl-WlHT.1 SUBM ITTALS: DESCRIPTION DATE I BY IREV ZDSREYISED Oll.Gl1B ] 1lil IS9JEDFORRE'O 05.u.ia I 1111 I o r:=E:·;~:n CHURCHI [APPLICA;~o~~~~2 A I r SITE ADDRESS : 5304 BURDEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 Page 333 of 368 Looking NorthPage 334 of 368 Looking EastPage 335 of 368 Looking SouthPage 336 of 368 Looking WestPage 337 of 368 SitePage 338 of 368 BEFORE Prepared by: ~ T-8QUARED SITE 8EllVICE8, UA: A , ... ~~. ~ HOSS Prepared for: Sprint\' ·:-MasTec ~ SP90XC142-A BURDEN ROAD CHURCH 5304 BURDEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 LOOKING NORTHWEST AFTER Page 339 of 368 BEFORE Prepared by: ~ T-8QUARED SITE 8EllVICE8, UA: A , ... ~~. ~ HOSS Prepared for: Sprint\' ~ ·:-MasTec PROPOSED SPRINT 6 '-6" STEEPLE EXTENSION \ SP90XC142-A BURDEN ROAD CHURCH 5304 BURDEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 LOOKING SOUTHEAST AFTER Page 340 of 368 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2018-009 APPLICANT: Sprint Spectrum LP HEARING DATE: 08/16/2018 655 Bradford Lane ACTION DATE: 09/20/2018 Idaho Falls, ID 83404 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-S-1 (Suburban District) Zone 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Short Plat 2005-02, LOT 2 General Location: 5304 Burden Boulevard (Parcel #117-330-067). Property Size: The parcel is approximately 1 acre; the lease area contains approximately 176 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array to be built inside a raised steeple. 2. ACCESS: The site is accessed from Burden Boulevard. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are currently available to the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned R-S-1 (Suburban District) and contains a church. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-1 SFDUs EAST: R-S-1 SFDUs SOUTH: R-S-1 SFDUs WEST: R-1 SFDUs 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Residential uses. Goal UF-2 suggests the City ought to maintain land use flexibility in regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. Policy UF-2-A encourages the sound management of all energy and communication utilities through coordination and cooperation dealing with construction of such facilities. Policy UF-2-B encourages the placement of utility substations which are necessary for the surrounding neighborhood. Page 341 of 368 2 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. ANALYSIS Sprint Wireless Sprint proposes a rooftop cell phone antenna array concealed in a raised steeple tower of a church structure located at 5304 Burden Boulevard. Sprint will also fence off an 11’ X 16’ area just adjacent to the HVAC unit on the south side of the church structure in order to house a power meter and fiber optic connection box. The proposed antennae would be located in the steeple tower, which would be raised an additional 6’ on the north (front) side of the building and would be designed and painted to match existing building. The PMC special permit review criteria for wireless facilities are written as follows: 25.70.075 WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. Wireless Communication Facilities are permitted under the following conditions: (1) Such structures shall be permitted in all industrial or C-3 zoning districts provided the location is 500 feet or more from a residential district. Any location closer than 500 feet requires special permit approval. (2) Such structures may be permitted by special permit in all other zoning districts provided said structures are: (a) Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or (b) Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. (3) All wireless communication facilities shall comply with the following standards: (a) Wireless facilities shall be screened or camouflaged by employing the best available technology. This may be accomplished by use of compatible materials, strategic location, color, stealth technologies, and/or other measures to achieve minimum visibility of the facility when viewed from public Page 342 of 368 3 rights-of-way and adjoining properties such that a casual observer cannot identify the Wireless Communication Facility. (b) Wireless facilities shall be located in the City in the following order of preference: i) Attached to or located on buildings or structures higher than 35 feet. ii) Located on or with a publicly owned facility iii) Located on a site other than those listed in a) or b). Commonly, cellular providers locate the equipment cabinets within a fenced area surrounding the base of a pole; in this case the ground-level equipment is proposed to be located behind a sight-obscuring fence adjacent the HVAC unit behind the building. The screening must meet design requirements of the I-182 Overlay District (PMC 25.58). Typical neighborhood concerns expressed over proposed cell towers in the past have included fear of electromagnetic radio waves and the unsightliness of tall towers within the neighborhood. Under Federal regulations cities are barred from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers, provided the equipment meets FCC standards. An application for a cell tower cannot be denied based on concern over electromagnetic waves. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned R-S-1 (Suburban District). 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Low-Density Residential uses. 3. The site is approximately 1 acre; the lease area contains approximately 176 square feet of equipment cabinet area on the ground plus an antenna array to be built inside an extended height steeple tower. 4. The site contains a church structure. 5. The proposed antennae will be mounted inside a steeple tower which would be raised an additional 6’ and designed and painted to match the current building. 6. All municipal utilities currently serve the site. Page 343 of 368 4 7. In the R-S-1 zone cellular facilities may be permitted by special permit provided the tower is either: i. Attached to or located on an existing or proposed building or structure that is higher than thirty-five (35) feet; or ii. Located on or with a publicly owned facility such as a water reservoir, fire station, police station, school, county or port facility. 8. The proposed cellular antennae will be mounted inside an existing 37’ church steeple tower which would be raised an additional 6.’ 9. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured 11’ X 16’ fenced area just adjacent to the HVAC unit on the south side of the church structure. 10. Federal regulations bar the City from considering electromagnetic radio waves in the permitting process for cell towers or denying permits based upon concerns over electromagnetic radio waves. 11. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the City should maintain land use flexibility with regard to placement of infrastructure for public and private utilities. 12. Cellular equipment creates minimal demands on City infrastructure. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address cellular equipment. The Comprehensive Plan goal UF-2 and policy UF-2-A discuss the need for sound management and coordination in the location of utilities and community facilities. Policy UT-1-C encourages coordination of utility providers’ functional plans with the City’s land use and utility plans to ensure long term service availability. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed use is a part of the communication network utilized by the general public. The proposed equipment will be located in such a manner so as not to impact other public utilities or services. The Page 344 of 368 5 proposed use does not require water and sewer. Only one service trip is expected to be generated each month. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The character of the vicinity is dominated by single-family dwelling units on all sides. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The areas on all sides are fully developed with single-family dwelling units. The antennae will be located on an existing church structure inside an existing steeple tower which would be raised an additional 6’ and designed and painted to match the building. Equipment serving the proposed antennae will be located within a sight-obscured 11’ X 16’ fenced area just adjacent to the HVAC unit on the south side of the church structure. The Antennae and equipment will likely not be noticeable from any surrounding properties. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The proposed cellular equipment will create no fumes, dust or noise during normal operations. Cellular facilities have been located throughout the community in residential, commercial and industrial zones without generating any complaints received by the City. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposal is required to be designed by a professional engineer to withstand the forces of nature. The applicant is also required by law to coordinate with the FAA and FCC prior to obtaining a building permit. Radio waves at frequencies utilized by local cellular networks have not been proven to be harmful to human health. Federal law prohibits the City from considering the impacts of radio wave frequencies when reviewing permits for cellular equipment. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to parcel #117-330-067; Page 345 of 368 6 2) The property shall be developed in substantial conformity with the elevations and site plan submitted with the application except as conditioned herein; 3) The proposed cellular facility must comply with all FCC and FAA regulations; 4) The wireless equipment and all its associated ground equipment and appurtenances must be removed within 90 days of discontinuation. 5) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit is not obtained by July 30, 2019. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Sprint Spectrum LP for the location of a concealed rooftop cell phone antenna array and its associated ground equipment located at 5304 Burden Boulevard with conditions as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. Page 346 of 368 1 Darcy Bourcier From:Mike Koontz <irondude99301@yahoo.com> Sent:Wednesday, August 08, 2018 4:03 PM To:Darcy Bourcier Subject:Proposed Cellular Antennae Array at the Christian Science Church I am a home owner who lives in very close proximity to the Christian Science Church. I strongly oppose approving a permit to allow installation of a cellular antennae array in the church steeple. Long term studies have not been done to verify that the electromagnetic waves are not harmful to human health. Additionally there is evidence that shows there is a potential for decreased property values due to the perceived health hazards from exposure to cellular antennae arrays. Understandably I do not want to take on either of these risks. I am very disappointed that the City of Pasco would consider allowing installation of a cellular tower array in a residential area much less want to take on the legal liability for approving this project. I would not live in a home with a cellular antennae array in close proximity to my living and sleeping areas. Sincerely, Michael L. Koontz Resident at 5213 Montpelier Dr., Pasco, WA.Yahoo Mail on Android Page 347 of 368 OverviewMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 500 1000 1500 2000FeetPage 348 of 368 VicinityMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 75 150 225 300 375FeetPage 349 of 368 Land UseMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 75 150 225 300 375FeetSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsSFDUsPage 350 of 368 ZoningMapItem: Cell Tower in R-S-1 Zone (FCCS Church)Applicant: Sprint Spectrum LPFile #: SP 2018-009SITE0 75 150 225 300 375FeetR-1R-1R-S-1R-S-1Page 351 of 368 Template Version: 4:3GBED1.2Version Date: 01/05/16©2016 Sprint. This information is subject to Sprint policies regarding use and is the property of Sprint and/or its relevant affiliates and may contain restricted, confidential or privileged materials intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure is prohibited without authorization.5Sprint Proprietary and Confidential InformationSE90XC142 Christian Science Church 5304 Burden RoadLegendProposed NewSitesExistingOnAirSiteCurrent 1900LTECoverageProposed1900LTECoverageCurrent 1900 LTE Coverage – PascoProposed 1900 LTE Coverage – Pasco Page 352 of 368 REGION MAP --/ ' 0 / 0 *SITE DIRECTIONS DIRECTlmJs FROM SPOKANE AIRPORT: DEPN\T W AIRPORT DR TOW/.RD W AIRPORT DR BEAR LEFT MIO THEN TURN LEFT OrffO W Al RPORT OR 1UArJ RIGHT omo s SPOTTED RD 1\JRrJ LEFT Ot.fl'O W FUGHTLl~J E BL\itl ROAD r.i.iME CH,6,!JGES TO S GROVE RO TM<E RAMP RIGHT FOR 1-90 WEST TOWAAQ S:E.i'.TTLE AT E<IT .220, TAKE RAMP RIGHT FOR US-3o;i5 SOIJTH lOWARD PASCO TURN RIGHT ot.fl'CI SELPH LAt~DlrJG RO TURfJ RIGHT TO STAY ON SEl.PH LANDING RD TVRt4 LEFT NlTO TAYLOR FLATS RO ROAD NAME CHM"JGES TC tJ ROAD SS TUR~J LEFT OMTO BUROHJ BLVD ARRIVE AT BUROErJ 8 LVD ON THE RIGHT JURISDICTION COMPLIANCE ML WORK S~ BE PERFORMED AUD rMTER~ !!~STALLED It~ ACCOROHlCE WITH THE CURREt.ff EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES 1'S AOOPlEO l?r' THE L.DCAL GOVER~J lt~G AUTHORITIES. NOTHING l~J TH ESE PLANS IS TO BE O'.lNSTRU ED TO PERMIT WORK tl<lT COtJFORMlljG TO THESE CODES. 1. 201 S I r.JTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2. Ar~Sl(TIA-222 STRUCTUPJ>L STANDARD 3. tJFPA 780 -LIGHTI'J ING PROTECTION CODE 4.. 2.015 rlATlOrlAL El.ECTRI~ com: @ CAU. WASHINGTON ONECML (800) 424-SSSS CAU.1 WOUINGDA'YS lllll'OllE YcnJ DIG! THE lJTILJTl ES "5 SHOWr~ or~ THIS SET OF DRAWINGS WERE DEVELOPED FROM THE l~JFDRMATION AVAILABLE. THE rtJFORMATIDN PROVIDED IS NOT IMPLIED NOR rtJTHlDED TO BE THE CDl.4PLETE lt.JVEtJTORr OF UTILITIES IN THIS I-REA. rr 15 1HE CCf'.JTRACTOR"S RESPOt~SIBIUTY TO VERIFY THE LOCATIOt~ OF & VTI UTIES (WHETHER SHOWN OR ~JOT) AND PROlECT SAID UTILITIES FROM M'ff ~AGE CAUSED BY CONTRAGTOR'S ACTIVrTIES. PROJECT: NEIGHBORHOOD EXPANSION SITE NAME: BURDEN ROAD CHURCH SITE NUMBER: SP90XC142 A SITE ADDRESS: 5304 BURDEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 JURISDICTION: FRANKLIN COUNTY SITE TYPE: 37' ROOFTOP SITE INFORMATION SITE ADDRESS: COUNTY: ZONING JURISDICTION: POWER COMPANY: AAV PROVIDER: PROPERTY OWNER: 5J04 BU ROEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 FOO~Kllt4 FRANKLlrJ COUNTY FRJJ'lKLlrJ UTILITY DEPARTMENT lllD tJ(A ftlllfOiUlfCH ofatmT,ICIEtfl\ST CONTACT: EVAN MEHtm5i\O&, Clli -SW.'7UIOO STRUCTURE INrDRt..IATION: LATITUDE: +s· 16' 13.630B" 1J (rlAD B3) 41;i.2704-.:528" LONGITUDE: 119· g• J<.9992'W (NAD fl.3) -119.15972.!' GROUND ELEVATION: 100• STRUCTURE HEIGHT: 37' AGL STRUCTURE TYPE: ROOFTOP ANTENNA CENTERLINE: 35'-10· AGL APPLICANT: SoRINT 65BD SPRIMT P,&,RKWAY OvERWJD PARK. KS 66251 SPRINT CONTACT: LAURA BEFITELLOTTI LAUAA BERTELLOTllQSPRlr.JT.COM HEETI Ng. T-1 ITITLE SHEET DRAWING INDEX SHEET TITLE Z-1 IOYE!tb.LL SITE PLArJ Z-2. IEQUIPMEJ'ff PL.A!J Z-J IELEYATIOtlS REV PLPNS PREPARED FOR;------. -...-"""""" > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FCIR; ·:-MasTec IXJ 8, IXllJGLAS RtW>. '12111 R.OOR cc.IAI. GAllBI, II. Sl114 PLJ.NS PREP,6,RED FOR: l 4m!Wftl--.co-. -.ir748 HOii -h---..-.. PLJ./"lS PREPARED BY: i -----_ ... _ ---EJ'JCtN EERIHG LICEtJSE: ~tl<lTICE: mrll•ClllR9ftl&Mi..m T'ISICllMOPET MG.,...,.,.. • ........._-.W.m Wl"llDIJTIE~WllllTEll~flfllUIT, SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE BY REV iIJSllUISED 00.113..1! 1M 1 ~ED mt Rr.EW D5.21.1B 1M 0 MASTEC CONTACT: MASTEC CM: fi Af'PUCIMT SITE t<•ME' CH RISTltlE Wl orn CHR1sr1NE.LANorn11MASITC.coM BURDEN ROAD CHURCHI PHotJE~ 'Q4Q_3S2.Bfl11 SE/\lj NAGEOTTE SEAt4.NAGEOTTEi!IMASTEC.C<JM PHONE' 310.910.001' r Af'PUCIWT SITE CA5CAIJL APPROVALS I PROJECT INFORMATION CONSULTING TEAM SP90XCl42A I SIGNER SPRINT CONSTRUCTION MM AGER SPRINT OPERATIONS MANAGER SPRINT RF ENGINEER 1.ANOLORO DDRESS~ SIGNATURE DATE I • 1t<STALL (2) C>.B1.irrs I I rSITE' • ilj5TALL (1) POWER Pl\OTECTOI< C'.BltlET lt4STAU.. (1) TEL.CO C.'\Blt4ET lt4STAL.L (1) H-FR,6,UE • llj5TALL (1) cot•CRETE EQUIPMENT PAD lt4SfAU.. (3) BDD/1900 MHz MlTE!JNAS lfJSTAL.L (3) BOD MHz RAUB • 1r~STAL.l.. (;;,) HIOO MHz RRU::; lt4STA1..L (3) MIMD NHENtlAS ltJSTALL (4) HYBRID CA.Bl.ES llJSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE lr~STAL.l.. AfJDrTIOrl TO EXISTIPJG STEEPLE ME FIRM; PROJECT MANAGERS! T-SOU A RED SITE SEFl\/IC:ES, L.LC 2500 HIGHLAt4D AQ.t.D, SUITE 201 HERMITAGE, PA.. 1S14B (724) 306-7855 HOSS corJSUL lltlG 4~0 W. .5TH AVEtJUE DENVER, CO 8021)4 :!IDJ.J24.074g CQUTACT: ED MAGINU 2.0B.530.'Q 1.39 '304-BUJWBN ROAD PASCO, WA99301 DWG ltJFORM ION: OAAWN Irr; 1)1 CH ECKEO BY: Gl'lt Page 353 of 368 STRUCTURE: INFORMA110N IS SHOWN fOR ILLUSTl?ATJVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUCTURAL IHTEGRrrr OF SUPPORTING STRUCTll RES, ANTE NH A MOUNTS, ANO FDU NDA TION SHALL BE VERIFl ED AS 1'.CCEPTMJLE BY AN mm rJEER CERTIR rn STRUCTUR'iL NJALYSIS, UTILIZING lHE ~JEW LOAf)l~JG REPRESENTED WllHll1 TI-IESE Dl'AWltlGS PRIO~ TO THE EXECVTtON OF ECVIPMEfJT CHAf~GES OONT.aJf~ED IN 'THESE DRAWINGS. OONTR.t\CTOR Sl¥il. OBTAl~l ALL S'mUCTUFW_ REPORTS Nm FOLLOW All. RECOMMErJOATiot~S-ACllJAL EQUIPMEJff LOCATIOtJS tMY SLIGHTLY VAFtr B&SEO ml Fl t.W. STRUCTUR,6,L AtJALYSIS. -' -PROPERTY Llf~E --::--__________ -::1/rnntJG = 0 EXISTl f~G BIJILDUJG· ,~ ~~· b ~I~ 1(7 >o" ~ 0 L'.1.' 1 .. I .. I .. 1 1 .. I .. 1 .. 1 .1. 1 .. I .. I . i I I I J OYERAI I SITE Pl AN 0 I 81 I I EXISTING BUI LOING , .. , .. _.__ _J + 1/1&" = 1'-0" PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. -Sptt"""""" > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FOR; ·:·MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGl.All R(W). 12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PLANS PREP,6,RED FOR: l 4m!Wftl--.co-. ~ HOii -h---..-.. PL>l'lS PREPARED BY: i -----_ ...... ---EJJClN EERING LICEtJSE: mrll•ClllR9ftl&Mi..m T'ISICllMOPET ~NOTICE: MGllM'mr•--....-.wmm Wl"llDIJTIE._MllTEll~flf...,-. SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE BY REV iIJSllUISED 00.113..18 .. , ~ED mt Ar.EW a:i.ll.1B "' ' r:=i:E~~:n CHURCHI [ ~PUCA•;;;o~~~42 A I r SITE ADDRESS' I '304-BUJWllN ROAD PASCO, WA99301 rHEET DESC= 1 DWG HJFOR" ION: [SHEET IJU"BER' l ~~~E~~: ! Z-1 Page 354 of 368 STRUCTURE: INFORMA110N IS SHOWN fOR ILLUSTl?ATJVE PURPOSES ONLY. STRUCTURAL IHTEGRrrr OF SUPPORTING STRUCTll RES, ANTE NH A MOUNTS, ANO FDU NDA TION SHALL BE VERIFl ED AS 1'.CCEPTMJLE BY AN mm rJEER CERTIR rn STRUCTUR'iL NJALYSIS, UTILIZING lHE ~JEW LOAf)l~JG REPRESENTED WllHll1 TI-IESE Dl'AWltlGS PRIO~ TO THE EXECVTtON OF ECVIPMEfJT CHAf~GES OONT.aJf~ED IN 'THESE DRAWINGS. OONTR.t\CTOR Sl¥il. OBTAl~l ALL S'mUCTUFW_ REPORTS Nm FOLLOW All. RECOMMErJOATiot~S-ACllJAL EQUIPMEJff LOCATIOtJS tMY SLIGHTLY VAFtr B&SEO ml Fl t.W. STRUCTUR,6,L AtJALYSIS. D'ilSTirJG BUILDJtl~ ,r:.<t¥" ~«· SlILfl.Ali :s1~ ~~ ~"" ·~~ 0 0 .. _ -UICRIU flNJJ.... GONCR CTE PAD PLACEMENT ~UST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION • + 0/1&" = 1'-0" PL>l'lS PREPARED FOR:------. _Sptt........,. > Sprint PLPJ'lS PREPARED FOR; ·:·MasTec IXJ 8. IXllJGLAll R(W). '12111 R.OOR cc.w. GAllBI, II. Zl114 PLANS PREP,6,RED FOR: l 4m!Wftl--.co-. ~ HOii -h---..-.. PL>l'lS PREPARED BY: i -----_ ...... ---EJJClN EERING LICErJSE: mrll•ClllR9ftl&Mi..m T'ISICllMOPET ~NOTICE: MGllM'mr•--....-.wmm Wl"llDIJTIE._MllTEll~flf...,-. SUBMITT.M...S: DESCRIPTlmJ DATE BY REV iIJSllUISED 00.113..18 .. , ~ED mt Ar.EW a:i.ll.1B ... ' r:=i:E~~:n CHURCHI [ ~PUCA•;;;o~~~42 A I r SITE ADDRESS' I '304-BUJWllN ROAD PASCO, WA99301 DWG ltJFORM ION: DAA'ffl'J Irr; 1)1 CH ECKEO BY: Gl'lt Page 355 of 368 smucruRE INFORMATION IS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. SlRUCTIJRAL INTEGRllY DF SUPPORTING STRUCTURES. ANTENNA MOUNTS. ANO FOUNDATION SHALL BE VERIFIED AS ACCEPTABLE BY AN ENGINEER CERTIFIED STRUCTIJRAL ANALYSIS, UTILIZING lliE NEW LOADING REPRESENTED WrTHIN THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO THE EXECUTION OF EQUIPMENT CHANGES CONTAINED IN THESE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHA.LL OBTAIN AU.. STRUCTIJRAL REPORTS AND FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS. ACTUAL EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS MAY SLIGHTLY VAffr BASED ON FINAL STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. INSTllLL SPRllT I' CHMI LINK FENCE II 11 II II 11 II ¢ II 11 II 0000 --t1F IWSED ROOF"' e EUV. 431-11 "'-AOL TOP OF EXISTING ROOF ~ _/ 0 ELEV. J7°-o'± AGL INSTALL SPRi;T ANTENNAS rlo. O ELEV. J5 10 AGL V ..._~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-GRADE EAST ELEVATION 1/4" -1·-0· I IDuDI II I I II I I I I II GRADE NORTH ELEVATION 1/8 " -1·-0 · PLANS PREPARED FOR:----- 8580Sprint Pal1aoay > Owrlor<I Palk, Kansls 116251 Sprint PLANS PREPARED FOR: ·=·MasTec 800 S. DOUGLAS ROAD, 121h R.OOR CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 PLANS PREPARED FOR: i '20WothA_,. O.nwr, CO 802CM 303.J:M.0748 HOSS www.ho .. con.ultlng.com PLANS PREPARED BY: .... ""'HIGHWID-"""'°' -a-HElllUTMLl'A U:UI .,......,_ -~ --ENGINEERING LICENSE:------. DRAWING NOTICE: Tl£Sl DOOJMUfTSAllEa>NADINIW.MDMETlllSOl.L l'ROPEIWf OFSJIAINT AlllO MA.V NOTBf'AElllOOIJCfD, DISISf'MINA.TmOI ltmmtBUTI:DwmtCUTTMf'f»RESSWlllTTINCON!if.HTCl-WlHT.1 SUBM ITTALS: DESCRIPTION DATE I BY IREV ZDSREYISED Oll.Gl1B ] 1lil IS9JEDFORRE'O 05.u.ia I 1111 I o r:=E:·;~:n CHURCHI [APPLICA;~o~~~~2 A I r SITE ADDRESS : 5304 BURDEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 Page 356 of 368 Looking NorthPage 357 of 368 Looking EastPage 358 of 368 Looking SouthPage 359 of 368 Looking WestPage 360 of 368 SitePage 361 of 368 BEFORE Prepared by: ~ T-8QUARED SITE 8EllVICE8, UA: A , ... ~~. ~ HOSS Prepared for: Sprint\' ·:-MasTec ~ SP90XC142-A BURDEN ROAD CHURCH 5304 BURDEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 LOOKING NORTHWEST AFTER Page 362 of 368 BEFORE Prepared by: ~ T-8QUARED SITE 8EllVICE8, UA: A , ... ~~. ~ HOSS Prepared for: Sprint\' ~ ·:-MasTec PROPOSED SPRINT 6 '-6" STEEPLE EXTENSION \ SP90XC142-A BURDEN ROAD CHURCH 5304 BURDEN ROAD PASCO, WA 99301 LOOKING SOUTHEAST AFTER Page 363 of 368 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 8/16/2018 G. Special Permit Location of a Wireless Communication Facilities in an RS-1 Zone (Sprint Spectrum LP) (MF# SP 2018-009) Chairman Myhrum read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit for the location of wireless communication facilities in an R -4 Zone. This application involves the location of a relay on top of an existing church at 5304 Burden Boulevard. The Pasco Municipal Code (PMC) establishes priorities for locating wireless facilities, with a preference in commercial or C-3 Zones. If not applicable, they may be permitted by the special permit process in other zones if they are attached to an existing building or structure at least 35’ in height or located within a publicly owned facility. The PMC contains standards for the aesthetics of the tower itself. The staff report contains information that that Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not allow a cell tower site to be rejected based on health effects provided that equipment meets the federal standards and regulations. This particular tower would be disguised in an existing steeple that will be raised approximately 6 ½ feet. Drawings of the before and after plans were presented of what the church will look like. Commissioner Bowers asked where the nearest C-3 zoning was to the proposed site. Mr. White said that he was unsure but nothing on Burden Boulevard. Commissioner Bykonen noted that in several letters received from the public there were comments that mentioned declining property values due nearby cell towers. Since this tower would be completely disguised and enclosed, she asked if there was any obligation on neighboring property owners to disclose of the nearby cell tower. Mr. White said he was not aware of any disclosure the nearby property owners would need to make. This topic has been discussed in prior public hearings regarding cell towers and the problem is that there are hundreds of internet articles and research indicating property value declines as well as adverse health effects and articles and research stating the opposite. Commissioner J. Campos stated that the proposed cell tower is much less invasive than many of the other cell towers the Planning Commission has approved in the past. Commissioner Bowers stated that she found the comments regarding declining property values interesting because everyone wants great cell phone reception. Ed Maginn, Hoss Consulting, Idaho Falls, ID spoke on behalf of his client, Sprint Spectrum LP. As Pasco continues to grow cell providers are trying to keep up with the growth. Sprint hired Hoss Consulting and they identified gaps in their coverage in Page 364 of 368 Pasco. They were hired to find the best locations to serve. Commissioner J. Campos asked the applicant why they decided on a stealth tower rather than a traditional tower. Mr. Maginn responded that it was due to the zoning and the locations needing coverage. Commissioner J. Campos asked if they could co-locate on other existing towers. Mr. Maginn answered that they looked at all of the options and that would have been their preferred option, however, all nearby towers were already at capacity. Commissioner Bowers asked if Sprint will pay the property owners to locate the tower on their building. Mr. Maginn said yes, they will lease the space. Commissioner Bowers discussed a map with other cell phone towers located nearby that she remembered seeing in previous special permit hearings. Mike Koontz, 5213 Montpelier Drive, spoke in opposition to the special permit application. He stated that his property adjoined the proposed site and while the towers cannot be denied based on health terms, it didn’t relieve his concerns as a neighbor as well as property value concerns. He questioned if he would have to disclose the cell tower if he were to sell his home and asked who would be responsible if studies come out in the future stating that the towers do cause issues with people. Amanda Cameron, 5206 Roosevelt Drive, spoke in opposition to the special permit application. She stated that her home was located directly behind the church and the steeple can be seen from her windows. She had many concerns about health and addressed studies that relate to people who live near cell towers. She was also concerned about home values. Irving Brown, 4701 Phoenix Lane, spoke in opposition to the special permit application siting health issues. He was also concerned with transparency and felt that the stealth tower was to conceal and hide the problem. Amanda Cameron, 5206 Roosevelt Drive, spoke again to add that she spoke with neighbors who did not receive their notice about the hearing. Mike Koontz, 5213 Montpelier Drive, spoke again to ask the Planning Commissioner’s if any of them would want the tower in their backyards. Chris Acevedo, 4619 Phoenix Lane, spoke in opposition to the special permit application. He asked if the City was getting any money from the tower and if the City would benefit from the tower in any way and where would that money go. He also Page 365 of 368 addressed decreasing property values and how it could hurt the community. Eduardo Hernandez, 5301 Montpelier Drive, spoke in opposition to the special permit application. He said his home was behind the church and he was concerned with health issues and property values. He suggested placing the tower elsewhere. Silbestre Hernandez, 5305 Montpelier Drive, spoke in opposition to the special permit application. He addressed health issues and property values and asked what gains the City would make. He said the towers should be located in nearby commercial. Irving Brown, 4701 Phoenix Lane, spoke again in opposition to the application and proposed some questions. Ed Maginn, Hoss Consulting, Idaho Falls, ID, addressed concerns discussed by the audience. He stated that the proposed stealth tower was not intended to “hide” anything but rather to protect properties values and be more aesthetically pleasing. The church is the only property that would have to disclose a wireless tower on a title report but not nearby property owners. Since the tower is under 35’, it will not be reported on the FAA websites as taller towers are so it will be difficult for people to search for this tower unless they know what they are looking for. The reason for this site is because one tower could service the entire area. If this site were denied and they would have to do towers, they would need three towers around the neighborho od just to make the same coverage as this one tower. Chairman Myhrum asked for clarification on the coverage and density pertaining to the cell tower. Patrick Kelley, Hoss Consulting, Denver, CO, clarified that the site selected is considered a “capacity site” and he explained what that meant. Most homes in the neighborhood don’t have landlines, they rely on cell phones. This service becomes a public safety issues for emergencies. Commissioner Myhrum asked if Sprint could lease this tower to other carriers in the future. Mr. Kelley said no, this is only a single carrier tower. Commissioner Portugal asked the applicant how they process community concerns when they select a location for a tower. Mr. Kelley replied that they do so through the process of special permits and attending public hearings which is the typical process in most communities. Ed Maginn, Hoss Consulting, Idaho Falls, ID added comments addressing their transparency and reminded the audience and Commissioner’s that if they were locating in a C-3 zone, they wouldn’t have to have a public hearing but with it being in a residential they have the special permit and hearings to be transparent and receive Page 366 of 368 public feedback. Commissioner Bowers referenced a cell tower the Planning Commission recommended for City Council approval that was disguised as a pine tree because people did not want to see a cell tower so it is common to disguise them and make them but had nothing to do with transparency. She also asked the applicant to address money to the applicant or City. Mr. Kelley said that they cannot disclose the amount in the agreement with the church but no money was to go to the City. Commissioner Bowers asked who would be liable if studies later prove cell towers effect health. Mr. Kelley said that would be up to the FCC. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to close the hearing on the proposed Sprint Spectrum antennae and equipment proposal, and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the September 20, 2018 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Page 367 of 368 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/20/2018 C. Special Permit Location of Wireless Communication Facilities in an R-S-1 Zone (Sprint Spectrum LP) (MF# SP 2018-009) Chairperson Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit application for the location of wireless communication facilities in an R-S-1 zone. There was dialogue between Commissioner Bowers, Chairperson Roach and staff regarding other locations of cell antennas concealed inside church steeples and if there had been any issues. Mr. White stated that there was one permitted recently inside a church steeple on Argent Road and that there have been no issues brought to the City’s attention. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Mendez, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Mendez, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the Sprint Spectrum LP for the location of a concealed rooftop cell phone antenna array and its associated ground equipment located at 5304 Burden Boulevard with conditions has contained in the September 20, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Page 368 of 368