The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018.08.06 Council Meeting PacketRegular Meeting AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. August 6, 2018 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Council members or the public, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately. 5 - 8 (a) Approval of Minutes To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council dated July 16, 2018. 9 - 10 (b) Bills and Communications To approve claims in the total amount of $4,747,404.04 ($2,547,573.66 in Checks Nos. 223546-223936; $1,382,327.82 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 821353-821367, 821381-821392, 821394-821453, 821456-821485, 821487- 821535, 821539-821575, 821577-821592, 821595, 821599-821623, 821648- 821656; $54,018.97 in Checks Nos. 51935-52007; $759,755.45 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30122948-30123488; $3,728.14 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 503-504). 11 - 16 (c) Dedication Deed: Right-of-Way for a Portion of Road 36 (MF# DEED 2018-008) To accept the deed from Larissa Murillo for a portion of the Road 36 right- of-way. 17 - 22 (d) Dedication Deed: Right-of-Way for a Portion of W. Argent Road (MF# DEED 2018-010) To accept the deed from Nancy Moore for a portion of the West Argent Road right-of-way. 23 - 29 (e) Street Vacation: A portion of W. Nixon Street (MF# VAC 2018-003) Page 1 of 139 Regular Meeting August 6, 2018 To approve Resolution No. 3850, a resolution setting 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, September 4, 2018, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of West Nixon Street. MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: 30 (a) Presentation of Proclamation for "National Health Center Week" Council to present Proclamation to Martin Valadez, Director of Business Development and Public Relations, Tri-Cities Community Health 31 - 36 (b) Yard and Business of the Month Awards Mayor Watkins to present Certificates of Appreciation for July 2018 "Yard of the Month" and "Business Appearance of the Month" to: • Osvaldo Munguia, 1015 N. 10th Avenue • David & Diana Campbell, 3602 W. Henry Street • Linton & Shawn Sims, 6304 Turf Paradise Drive • Tom & Judy Moore, 10300 Willow Way • Starbucks, 2411 W. Court Street 5. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: This item is provided to allow citizens the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. 6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: (a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers 37 - 39 (b) General Fund Operating Statement 7. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO: 40 - 59 (a) Chapel Hill Boulevard LID Formation, No. 16030 CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING Page 2 of 139 Regular Meeting August 6, 2018 MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4391, relating to full roadway improvements that includes road construction to three-lane and five-lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, and landscaping (collectively, the “Improvements”); ordering the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, all in accordance with Resolution No. 3829 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 150, and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvements; providing that payment for the improvements be made by special assessments upon the property in the District, payable by the mode of “payment by bonds;” and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and local improvement district bonds. 8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: 60 - 79 (a) *Special Permit: Location of a Church in a C-1 District (MF #SP 2018- 006) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3851, approving a special permit for the location of a church at 1103 West Court Street. 80 - 112 (b) *Preliminary Plat: The Parks at Riverbend (MF# PP 2018-004) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3852, approving the Preliminary Plat for The Parks at Riverbend. 113 - 120 (c) Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policy MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3853, approving the Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policy. 121 - 139 (d) Electronic Traffic Control MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4392, creating a New Section 10.22 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled "Automated Traffic Camera Systems", and amending Section 1.02.020 entitled " Initiation of Civil Infraction Proceedings" and further, to authorize publication by summary only. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 10. NEW BUSINESS: 11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: Page 3 of 139 Regular Meeting August 6, 2018 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 13. ADJOURNMENT. (RC) Roll Call Vote Required * Item not previously discussed Q Quasi-Judicial Matter MF# “Master File #....” REMINDERS: 1. 1:30 p.m., Monday, August 6, Fire Training Center, 1811 S. Ely, Kennewick – Emergency Medical Services Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BLANCHE BARAJAS, Rep.; DAVID MILNE, Alt.) 2. 7:00 a.m., Thursday, August 9, Cousin’s Restaurant, Pasco– BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER RUBEN ALVARADO, Rep.; PETE SERRANO, Alt.) 3. 7:00 p.m., Thursday, August 9, Transit Facility - Ben-Franklin Transit Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER RUBEN ALVARADO, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Spanish language interpreter service may be provided upon request. Please provide two business day's notice to the City Clerk to ensure availability. (Servicio de intérprete puede estar disponible con aviso. Por favor avisa la Secretaria Municipal dos días antes para garantizar la disponibilidad.) Page 4 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 30, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes I. REFERENCE(S): Minutes 07.16.18 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council dated July 16, 2018. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 5 of 139 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL JULY 16, 2018 CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Ruben Alvarado, Blanche Barajas, Craig Maloney, Saul Martinez, David Milne, Pete Serrano, and Matt Watkins. Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager; Leland Kerr, City Attorney; Steve Worley, Public Works Director; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Richa Sigdel, Finance Director; Dan Dotta, Interim Administrative & Community Services Director; Bob Metzger, Police Chief; Bob Gear, Fire Chief; Michael Morales, Deputy Community & Economic Development Director; Ken Roske, Deputy Police Chief and Colleen Chapin, Human Resources Manager. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of Minutes To approve the minutes of the Pasco City Council dated July 2, 2018. Bills and Communications To approve claims in the total amount of $1,921,582.79 ($941,836.38 in Check Nos. 223271-223545; $145,162.13 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 821393, 821454-821455, 821486, 821536; $50,285.15 in Check Nos. 51859-51934; $778,054.50 in Electronic Transfer Nos.30122404-30122947; $6,244.63 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 496-501). To approve bad debt write-off for Utility Billing, Ambulance, Cemetery, General Accounts, Miscellaneous Accounts, and Municipal Court (non- criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of $253,007.96 and, of that amount, authorize $176,122.97 to be turned over for collection. Interlocal Agreement for School Resource Officer Services To approve the Interagency Agreement with the Pasco School District for police resource officers services for the 2018-19 and 2019-20 school years and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. COPS Hiring Program To approve the acceptance of the 2017 COPS Hiring Program Award in the amount of $500,000 and authorize the city manager to sign the agreement. Special Permit Appeal: Mor-Stor Mini Storage Expansion in a C-1 Zone (MF# APPL 2018-002) To set 7:00 p.m., August 20, 2018, as the time and date for a closed record Page 1 of 3 Page 6 of 139 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL JULY 16, 2018 hearing to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission recommendation filed under Master File # APPL 2018-002. Mr. Maloney moved to approve the Consent Agenda as read. Mr. Martinez seconded. Approved by unanimous Roll Call vote. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: • Mark Christianson, 410 S. Meadow St. - Preciousness of time. • Rick Rios, 101 Heron Rd. - Does not support campaign by Latino Civic Alliance against Police Chief Metzger, excellent policing and community engagement. • Gabriel Munoz - Eastern Washington Vice-Chair Latino Civic Alliance - speaking for those dismissed and ignored. • Dora Murfin - comments regarding Border Patrol Training. • Columbia Basin Student - Petition that was signed by twenty-seven students and names withheld in regard to Border Patrol matter. • Unidentified Citizen - Speaking for those who are not heard. • Guadalupe Sanchez, Yakima, WA - Comments regarding history repeating itself. • Chris Mortensen - Local 1433 - Proud to work in a diverse community and serve. Supports the training and thanked Chief Metzger. • Jean Reichman - Pasco resident - agrees with Felix Vargas and supports the chief and local Latino community. Would not be good for Pasco to fire the chief. • Ravine Jimenez - 30 year resident - thanked the Latino Civic Alliance for bringing this to light. Plenty of interpreters who could have provided the training. • Peter Rieke - new member of Inclusivity Commission. "Bring concerns to us". • Russell Glatt - comments regarding red light camera issue. Is against the implementation. Would prefer to see more FTE police positions. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: Verbal Reports from Councilmembers • Mr. Alvarado attended the Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Meeting. DOT gave a presentation stating that they will be changing the way they are approving projects. • Mr. Milne attended Sundown in Tri-town and it was a great event. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: Ordinance Modifying PMC 10.56 "Parking - Streets Restricted" MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4390, amending Chapter 10.56, Section 10.56.080 Schedule III - Parking Prohibited at All Times on Certain Streets, of the Pasco Municipal Code. Mr. Alvarado seconded. Motion carried unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: Collective Bargaining Agreement with IAFF, Local 1433 MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to approve the Collective Bargaining Page 2 of 3 Page 7 of 139 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL JULY 16, 2018 Agreement with the IAFF Local #1433, for the years 2018 - 2020 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. Mr. Serrano seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Collective Bargaining Agreement with Pasco Police Officers Assoc. (PPOA) - Non-Uniform MOTION: Mr. Maloney move to approve the Collective Bargaining Agreement with the PPOA Non-Uniform Unit, for years 2017 - 2019 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute agreement. Ms. Barajas seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Bid Award: Road 84 Safe Walking Route Connection MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to award the Road 84 Safe Walking Route Connection project to Moreno & Nelson Construction Corp. in the amount of $141,910.00 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents. Mr. Alvarado seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Bid Award: Rowena Chess School Crossing MOTION: Mr. Maloney moved to award the Rowena Chess School Crossing project to Allstar Construction Group in the amount of $61,019.85 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents. Mr. Milne seconded. Motion carried unanimously. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: Mr. Zabell discussed the "Meal after School Program" between 7-11 and Pasco Recreation Services. It is for one year and last week forty children were served. ADJOURNMENT. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:54 p.m. PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of July, 2018. APPROVED: ATTEST: Matt Watkins, Mayor Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Page 3 of 3 Page 8 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council August 2, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Richa Sigdel, Director Finance SUBJECT: Bills and Communications I. REFERENCE(S): Accounts Payable 08.06.18 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve claims in the total amount of $4,747,404.04 ($2,547,573.66 in Checks Nos. 223546-223936; $1,382,327.82 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 821353-821367, 821381- 821392, 821394-821453, 821456-821485, 821487-821535, 821539-821575, 821577- 821592, 821595, 821599-821623, 821648-821656; $54,018.97 in Checks Nos. 51935- 52007; $759,755.45 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30122948-30123488; $3,728.14 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 503-504). III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 9 of 139 REPORTING PERIOD: August 6, 2018 Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined Check Numbers 223546-223936 51935-52007 Total Check Amount $2,547,573.66 $54,018.97 Total Checks 2,601,592.63$ Electronic Transfer Numbers 821353-821367 30122948-30123488 503-504 821381-821392 821394-821453 821456-821485 821487-821535 821539-821575 821577-821592 821595 821599-821623 821648-821656 Total EFT Amount $1,382,327.82 $759,755.45 $3,728.14 $0.00 Total EFTs 2,145,811.41$ Grand Total 4,747,404.04$ Councilmember 977,483.66 29,938.52 0.00 0.00 12.54 0.00 13,942.94 10,517.44 11,180.76 2,972.50 117,185.43 3,389.23 1,412.03 412.19 0.00 8,200.97 17,843.00 0.00 76,133.23 11,566.62 829,882.26 1,142,861.16 14,814.57 12,012.62 8,916.04 101,936.71 287.98 1,044.53 1,353,457.11 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:4,747,404.04$ EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE OLD FIRE OPEB FLEX PAYROLL CLEARING EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS LITTER ABATEMENT REVOLVING ABATEMENT TRAC DEVELOPMENT & OPERATING PARKS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION UTILITY, WATER/SEWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN C.D. BLOCK GRANT HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER AMBULANCE SERVICE CEMETERY ATHLETIC PROGRAMS GOLF COURSE SENIOR CENTER OPERATING MULTI-MODAL FACILITY STREET OVERLAY City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim. Dave Zabell, City Manager Richa Sigdel, Finance Director We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this 6th day of August, 2018 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment: Councilmember SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERAL FUND STREET ARTERIAL STREET The City Council July 12 - August 1, 2018 C I T Y O F P A S C O Council Meeting of: Accounts Payable Approved Page 10 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 30, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Darcy Bourcier, Planner I Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Dedication Deed: Right-of-Way for a Portion of Road 36 (MF# DEED 2018- 008) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Dedication Deed II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to accept the deed from Larissa Murillo for a portion of the Road 36 right-of-way. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: When a property owner applies for a building permit, they are required to dedicate the necessary right-of-way if sufficient right-of-way has not already been dedicated. This is a common occurrence in the parts of Pasco that were developed while in the Coun ty and later annexed into the City. Oftentimes, former County developments either: 1. Dedicated amounts of right-of-way satisfactory for County standards but not City standards; or 2. Not required to dedicate any right-of-way at all. It is likely in this case that right-of-way had not been dedicated at all at the time the applicant's neighborhood was platted. The property owner applied for a permit to construct a shed and fence. As a condition Page 11 of 139 of permit approval, she is required to dedicate (per Resolution 1372) the necessary right-of-way for Road 36 abutting her lot. V. DISCUSSION: The east thirty feet of the applicant's property must be dedicated for future use as municipal right of way as a condition of permit approval. Page 12 of 139 City of Pasco, IS Division OverviewMap Item : Dedication ROW for Road 36Applicant: Larissa MurilloFile #: DEED2018-008 ± SITE 0 90 180 270 36045Feet Road 35W Park St Road 37Road 36W Park St W Margaret St Page 13 of 139 VicinityMap Item : Dedication ROW for Road 36Applicant: Larissa MurilloFile #: DEED2018-008 ± SITE 0 25 50 75 10012.5 Feet Road 36W Park St Page 14 of 139 After Recording,Return To: City of Pasco,Washington Attn:City Planner 525 North 3"‘ Pasco,WA 99301 DEDICATION DEED Tax Parcel No.119521054 THE GRANTOR,ESQ wflullb by donation pursuant to RCW 35A.79.010,dedicates,conveys and quit claims to the GRANTEE,THE CITY OF PASCO,a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington,for the public use,as a public right-of-way and all interest in the land described as follows: The east thirty feet of the East half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter,Section 26,Township 9 North Range 29 East,less the north 544 feet and less the West half of the East half of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter except the noith 544 feet. DATEDthis Ol?vdayof)x/H3,2o1a. GRANT I STATE OF WASHINGTON ) :ss. County of Franklin ) Dedication Deed Parcel #119521054 Page 15 of 139 On this Q day of {M:1 ,2018,before me,the undersigned.duly commissioned and sworn,personally appeared to me known to be the individual(s)described above and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as an agent of the owner(s)of record,and acknowledged to me that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he/she/they is/are authorized to execute the said instrument. GIVEN under by hand and official seal this Q day of gutL\[, 2018. Print NamezfZ.P®.)51,P<::¢?— on‘Pubuc NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washingtonam.91 gm Residing at:D C2a,O"t‘\( RAQUELESPA My Commission Expires:U1 Z/DMYOOMMISSIONEXPIE M ' _ Dedication Deed Parcel #119521054 Page 16 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR:City Council July 30, 2018 TO:Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM:Darcy Bourcier, Planner I Community & Economic Development SUBJECT:Dedication Deed: Right-of-Way for a Portion of W. Argent Road (MF# DEED 2018-010) I.REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Dedication Deed II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to accept the deed from Nancy Moore for a portion of the West Argent Road right-of-way. III.FISCAL IMPACT: None IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: When a property owner applies for a building permit, they are required to dedicate the necessary right-of-way if sufficient right-of-way has not already been dedicated. This is a common occurrence in the parts of Pasco that were developed while in the County and later annexed into the City. Oftentimes, former County developments either: 1. Dedicated amounts of right-of-way satisfactory for County standards but not City standards; or 2. Not required to dedicate any right-of-way at all. It is likely in this case that right-of-way had not been dedicated at all at the time much of the applicant's neighborhood was platted. Page 17 of 139 In this case, the property owner applied for a permit to construct a single family dwelling. As a condition of permit approval, she is required to dedicate (per Resolution 1372) the necessary right-of-way for W. Argent Road abutting her lot. V.DISCUSSION: The south twenty feet of the applicant's property must be dedicated for future use as municipal right-of-way as a condition of permit approval. Page 18 of 139 City of Pasco, IS Division OverviewMap Item : Dedication ROW for W Argent RdApplicant: Nancy MooreFile #: DEED2018-010 ± SITE 0 120 240 360 48060Feet Road 56CITY LIMITS Pim lico Dr W Argent Rd Bosch CtPage 19 of 139 VicinityMap Item : Dedication ROW for W Argent RdApplicant: Nancy MooreFile #: DEED2018-010 ± SITE 0 30 60 90 12015Feet Road 56W Argent Rd Page 20 of 139 After Recording,Return To: City of Pasco,Washington Attn:City Planner 525 North 3'“ Pasco,WA 99301 DEDICATION DEED Tax Parcel No.117 480 085 Address:5529 W Argent Road THE GRANTOR,Nancy Heaton,by donation pursuant to RCW 35A.79.0lO,dedicates, conveys and quit claims to the GRANTEE,THE CITY OF PASCO,a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington,for the public use,as a public right-of—way,all interest in the land described as follows: The South 20 feet ofa portion of Section 15,Township 29,Range 9,W.M.City ofPasco, Franklin County,Washington being more particularly described as follows. The West 361'Feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarterof Section 15, Township 29,Range 9 lying South ofa line 50 Feet South of and a point to the center line of FCID #1 canal,except the right—of-wayfor Argent Road and except the East 180 Feet thereof. DATED thiszoday of {Fa,2018. GRANTOR(S) Owner(s) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) :ss. County of Franklin ) On this2Oday of l lL ,2018,before me,the undersigned,duly to be Dedication Deed -1 Page 21 of 139 the indiVidual(s)described above and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as an agent of the owner(s)of record,and acknowledged to me that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and urposes t rein mentioned,and on commissioned and sworn,personally appeared .0(}’@me known oath stated that he/she/they is/are authorized to execute the sa instrument. GIVEN under by hand and of?cial seal this 2(2 day of [, 2 0 18 . ‘\\\\\_.__ 7 V ' A.-N5‘_‘(\_a‘\“6;'-..,'Q2://zarzmzrl564-‘-‘7 NOTARY 'I '/¢in an frthe S -e fWashin ton-Y--,,-*“”‘‘"57"’ 4. "I!--g 0;’Residing at:Q’LI5575MyCommissionExpires: I <9?»5 Dedication Deed -2 Page 22 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 26, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Darcy Bourcier, Planner I Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Street Vacation: A portion of W. Nixon Street (MF# VAC 2018-003) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Resolution Overview Map Vicinity Map Vacation Petition II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No._____, a resolution setting 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, September 4, 2018, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of West Nixon Street. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Property owners near the northwest corner of W. Sylvester Street and Road 52 have petitioned for the vacation of a portion of W. Nixon Street in the referenced area. The W. Nixon Street right-of-way in question is undeveloped and is currently being used by the adjoining property owners as an extension of their backyards. Gabriel Portugal, who owns property to the north of the right-of-way, has plans to submit a short plat application to the City to divide his property after the right-of-way has been vacated. The petition requires the City Council to fix a public hearing to consider the vacation request. The earliest regular City Council meeting available for a public hearing which provides the statutory 20-day hearing notice is September 4, 2018. Page 23 of 139 V. DISCUSSION: Per PMC 12.40 the Council may require compensation for vacated right -of-way. The compensation involves obtaining a title report and appraisal of value. However, the compensation and the requirements attached thereto may be waived if one or more of the following conditions apply: 1. The vacation is initiated by the City Council by Resolution; 2. The vacation is at the request of the City; 3. The right-of-way to be vacated was previously determined by the City Council not to be essential to public traffic circulation and available for vacation; 4. The grant of substitute public right-of-way which has a value as a right-of-way at least equal to that right-of-way to be vacated; and 5. The resulting benefit to the community of the project requiring the vacation outweighs the appraised value of the right-of-way to be vacated. Page 24 of 139 RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION SETTING 7:00 PM, TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2018 AS THE TIME AND DATE TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VACATING A PORTION OF WEST NIXON STREET. WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate right-of-way; and WHEREAS, a petition for the vacation of a portion of West Nixon Street has been submitted to the City; and, WHEREAS, the street vacation process provided in PMC 12.40 requires a title report and an appraisal of value and compensation unless waived by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council may waive the requirement for a title report, an appraisal of value and compensation if the Council has previously determined the street in question can be vacated; and, WHEREAS, the date at which the right-of-way proposed for vacation was platted and dedicated is unknown. Said right-of-way has never been improved; and, WHEREAS, there is currently no justification for the Council to waive the requirements of PMC 12.40, and; WHEREAS, a public hearing is needed for the Council to more fully make a reasoned determination on the need for compensation to offset the loss of public right -of-way as the result of the proposed street vacation, and; WHEREAS, R.C.W. 35.79 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: Section 1. Compensation of Vacated Right-of-Way: Pursuant to PMC 12.40 the City Council hereby reserves the right to require an appraisal, survey, submittal of a title report and payment of compensation for the proposed vacation, and; Section 2. Notice of Hearing: That a public hearing to consider vacating West Nixon Street adjacent 804 Road 52 to the south will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on September 4, 2018. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 4th day of September, 2018. _____________________________ Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Daniela Erickson Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney Page 25 of 139 City of Pasco, IS Division OverviewMap Item : Vacation ROW for W Nixon StApplicant: Gabriel PortugalFile #: VAC2018-003 ± SITE 0 250 500 750 1,000125Feet Road 52W Sylvester St Road 54Road 56W Nixon St W Margaret StR oad 50Page 26 of 139 VicinityMap Item : Vacation ROW for W Nixon StApplicant: Gabriel PortugalFile #: VAC2018-003 ± SITE 0 80 160 240 32040Feet Road 52W Sylvester StRoad 54Page 27 of 139 FEE $300 CITY OF PASCO STREET /ALLEY VACATION PETITION MASTER FILE #DATE SUBMITTED: I,we the undersigned,owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to Vacate the following described street /alley rights—of-way: ,7?r APPLICANT:a/arr‘//0 ft “I 5'PROPERTY OWNED Print Name;'’(Legal Description) ’ ,,/7/V 309’730 5; ‘n,‘pl,/~I -1’‘ ,'‘ I . > Sign Name:Wi7w~</iikrltvzvlv.é/ZZZZO/g /’C‘?L”?i/0,,., Address:$3C,Zf'7<DV§g,//Date 52"/25t'7‘N"5L"Z7'7’Z€/ Phone #(5(,u1)//3&0 ~C5°l’~’p 1532;u!«’5,ne_ste./S P _ ;1 .~--'9 Print Name:5 Few //0wé W‘1:279$359?53;];/E:‘‘Tc>c—:wm+w9'0 5‘*9 EL}FW ‘ A ~M‘ 'A/E4THl§:IeEOF,LESS éA5DEr1e.v‘}b5q"‘7 I Sign Name:‘ 5"’<0’9L3~"lg 277"RC’ Date 7/L f\/RD52 r ..”.‘Z?’7"’.°Z .»27Af_2<{ 4 ;/;//Z;8 455;:72,0 Da/te Updated 7.18.2017 Page 28 of 139 FEE $300!a‘.1u?"!..'! ‘ ‘m:«=f.w=v :1!»51-, CITY OF PASCO STREET /ALLEY VACATION PETITION MASTER FILE #DATE SUBMITTED: I,we the undersigned,owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the following described street/alley rights—of-Way: /,-”y /‘/v’/72V r /7 17' APPLICANT:374123rmdz r w P?”V;L PROPERTY OWNED Print Narnez '(Legal Description} /1 ,QC7 /V R D 531 Sign Namet,7'33/'[‘LI<+~».4/2 2/20/5}?qé 7/0729 Address::7/‘K D‘,5"3i'Date 5 ZNZ SE‘{SEL//\/E‘/'Z7—7:1? Phone #(Vbqpq)/7/3:3‘5,-C;f{cyi(_,i .. V I .5% PrintName:jmfm 9.17;ovi4,;U%a,v 5517 w Sylvester miwno «as A.E 70‘0F w32‘52SE‘f5EL{NE Sign Nm6§-[‘§@v\4’VWv9%201$1+‘27—7«2‘/Exc N/0' 0F57‘/ 1 era 5‘or w cos‘HE *JD L655 PUDEA5 R\:ol7& “/5301 W5911/estéc“Sf ‘‘‘(I /Hm/M: A I"it E /3"‘oFW 3<i¢'5‘2>E‘791%?‘/inf.5E*//\fE‘/27—Lz~27" Date Print Name: Sign Name: Updated 7.18.2017 Page 29 of 139 Proclamation “National Health Center Week” August 12-18, 2018 WHEREAS, for over 50 years, Community Health Centers have provided high-quality, affordable, comprehensive primary and preventive health care in our nation’s underserved communities, delivering value to, and having a significant impact on America’s health care system. WHEREAS, as the country’s largest primary care network, Health Centers are a critical element of the health system, serving both rural and urban populations, and often providing the only accessible and dependable source of primary care in their communities. One in every twelve people in the United States gets their care in a community health center and Health Centers serve one in every six residents in rural areas. WHEREAS, Health Centers are locally owned and operated small businesses that serve as critical economic engines, helping to power local economies by generating $45.6 billion in economic impact in some of the country’s most economically deprived communities. WHEREAS, Health Centers nationally employ more than 200,000 people, including physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and certified nurse midwives who work as part of multi-disciplinary clinical teams designed to treat the whole patient. WHEREAS, The Health Center model continues to prove an effective means of overcoming barriers to healthcare access, including geography, income and insurance status, and in doing so, improves health care outcomes and reduces health care system costs. WHEREAS, Health Centers are on the front lines of emerging health care crises, providing access to care for our nation’s veterans, addressing the opioid epidemic, and responding to public health threats in the wake of natural disasters. WHEREAS, National Health Center Week offers the opportunity to recognize America’s nearly 1,400 health center organizations with over 10,400 service delivery sites, their dedicated staff, board members, patients and all those responsible for their continued success and growth since the first health centers opened their doors more than 50 years ago. WHEREAS, During National Health Center Week, we celebrate the legacy of America’s Health Centers, and their vital role in shaping the past, present, and future of America’s health care system. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Matt Watkins, Mayor of the City of Pasco in Washington, do hereby proclaim August 12-18, 2018, as National Health Center Week. I encourage all residents to take part in this week by visiting their local Health Center and celebrating the important partnership between America’s Health Centers and the communities they serve. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Official Seal of the City of Pasco, State of Washington, to be affixed this 6th day of August 2018. Matt Watkins, Mayor City of Pasco Page 30 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 24, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Dan Dotta, Interim Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Yard and Business of the Month Awards I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Mayor Watkins to present Certificates of Appreciation for July 2018 "Yard of the Month" and "Business Appearance of the Month" to: • Osvaldo Munguia, 1015 N. 10th Avenue • David & Diana Campbell, 3602 W. Henry Street • Linton & Shawn Sims, 6304 Turf Paradise Drive • Tom & Judy Moore, 10300 Willow Way • Starbucks, 2411 W. Court Street III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 31 of 139 Citg03$‘P0900 Certi?catecfSzljajareciation The City Council of the City of Pasco is proud to select 1015 N.IOTHAVE Home of OSVALDO MUNGUIA “YARD OF THE MONTH” We hereby express our gratitude for your contribution toward community enrichment and quality of life by the improvements made to the natural beauty of your surroundings and serving as a good example for others. Given this 6th day of August,2018 Matt Watkins,Mayor Page 32 of 139 Given this 6th day of August,2018 Citg05Cpaeco Certi?cateqf?yyreciation The City Council of the City of Pasco is proud to select 3602 W.HENRY ST Home of DAVID 8*DIANA CAMPBELL “YARD OF THE MONTH” We hereby express our gratitude for your contribution toward community enrichment and quality of life by the improvements made to the natural beauty of your surroundings and serving as a good example for others. Matt Watkins,Mayor Page 33 of 139 Citg01$Cpasco Certi?catecfizljajoreciation The City Council of the City of Pasco is proud to select 6304 TURF PARADISE Home of LINTON 5’SHAWN SIMS “YARD OF THE MONTH” We hereby express our gratitude for your contribution toward community enrichment and quality of life by the improvements made to the natural beauty of your surroundings and serving as a good example for others. Matt Watkins,Mayor Page 34 of 139 Citg015(Pasco Certi?catecfiiljajareciation The City Council of the City of Pasco is proud to select 10300 WILLOW WAY Home of TOM 8*Iumr M00121; “YARD OF THE MONTH” We hereby express our gratitude for your contribution toward community enrichment and quality of life by the improvements made to the natural beauty of your surroundings and serving as a good example for others. Given this 6th day of August,2018 Matt Watkins,Mayor Page 35 of 139 Page 36 of 139 CommentsApril, May, Oct, Nov when taxes are receivedGENERAL FUND REVENUES OVER/UNDER EXPENDITURES: YTD revenue exceed expenditure by $4,252,477 compared to $2,074,247 in 2017 during the same period. The 2018 year-end projection is for expenditures to exceed revenue by $210,000, mostly due to one time investments being made by the City to move to SEACOMM. At this time, we expect the revenue and expenses to track with budget as planned by the end of the year. Fund Balance reserves help to stabilize operations for unexpected adverse fluctuations in revenue or expenditure actual amounts. $0$5,000$10,000$15,000$20,000$25,000$30,000$35,000$40,000$45,000$50,000JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DECThousands2018 CUMULATIVE GENERAL FUND REVENUE & EXPENDITURES2018 Cumulative Revenue2018 Cumulative Expenditures4‐Yr Average Rev4‐Yr Average ExpPage 37 of 139 GENERAL FUND END FUND BALANCE HISTORY: The City designates the fund balance into two categories, restricted and unrestricted. The unrestricted fund balance represents funds the City sets aside as a stabilization fund, the intent of which is to smooth over unexpected fluctuations in revenues and expenditures. The fund balance is normally built up when revenues exceed expenditures. The 2017 fund balance is lower than prior year due to accrual of an additional pay period as recommended by State Auditor's Office. This accural was not a standard practice for the City in prior years.2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 BudgetedRestricted633,424 598,779 5,369,708 442,300 451,628 451,628Unrestricted5,611,795 8,784,382 11,919,407 14,190,914 13,117,767 13,048,372 $- $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 $18,000 $20,000$'s ThousandsGeneral Fund - Fund Balance Trend Page 38 of 139 GENERAL FUND Average Elapsed Time 49%REVENUE SOURCES2017 Budget2017 YTD Actual% of Annual Budget 2018 Budget2018 YTD Actual% of Annual Budget Variance CommentsTAXES: PROPERTY 7,825,655 4,532,301 58% 8,182,758 4,701,904 57% SALES 12,300,000 6,174,005 50% 12,675,000 6,640,969 52% PUBLIC SAFETY 1,400,000 692,334 49% 1,488,740 768,612 52% UTILITY 9,267,000 4,755,550 51% 9,498,808 4,760,729 50% OTHER 1,204,000 593,413 49% 1,215,170 659,046 54%LICENSES & PERMITS 1,921,964 1,372,151 71% 2,054,200 1,600,521 78%INTERGOV'T REVENUE 2,118,837 1,024,958 48% 2,317,438 770,944 33% Timing of State PUD Priviledge tax. Not recv'd but expected soon.CHARGES FOR SERVICES 6,523,156 3,484,117 53% 7,093,604 3,644,437 51%FINES & FORFEITS 872,100 391,307 45% 853,100 498,087 58%MISC. REVENUE 498,760 267,598 54% 528,800 1,033,866 196% Sale of city propertyDEBT AND TRANSFERS IN593,000 541,504 91% 227,600 113,806 50% Timing of internal fund transfersTOTAL 44,524,472 23,829,238 54% 46,135,218 25,192,921 55%EXPENDITURES2017 Budget2017 YTD Actual% of Annual Budget 2018 Budget2018 YTD Actual% of Annual Budget Variance CommentsCITY COUNCIL111,975 54,646 49% 124,511 63,416 51%MUNICIPAL COURT 1,763,123 665,901 38% 1,464,406 656,460 45%CITY MANAGER 1,593,838 900,100 56% 2,564,519 794,818 31% One-time costs not expensed yetPOLICE 15,483,731 7,784,870 50% 16,544,349 7,537,538 46%FIRE 7,055,942 3,571,589 51% 6,859,386 3,545,094 52%ADMIN & COMMUNITY SVCS 6,801,261 3,442,842 51% 7,533,004 3,427,590 46%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1,592,376 849,287 53% 1,728,603 815,942 47%FINANCE 2,019,332 1,008,780 50% 2,231,311 1,011,349 45%ENGINEERING 1,798,269 811,791 45% 1,801,529 755,578 42%LIBRARY 1,330,220 669,493 50% 1,377,958 686,283 50%NON-DEPARTMENTAL 2,219,313 1,021,560 46% 2,173,513 1,063,742 49%DEBT AND TRANSFERS OUT 2,747,400 974,132 35% 1,941,700 582,634 30%TOTAL 44,516,780 21,754,991 49% 46,344,789 20,940,444 45%2017 20182017 2018 Page 39 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 23, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Steve Worley, Public Works Director Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Chapel Hill Boulevard LID Formation, No. 16030 I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution No. 3829 Estimated Project Costs Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. ____ relating to full roadway improvements that includes road construction to three-lane and five-lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, and landscaping (collectively, the “Improvements”); ordering the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, all in accordance with Resolution No. 3829 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 150, and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvements; providing that payment for the improvements be made by special assessments upon the property in the District, payable by the mode of “payment by bonds;” and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and local improvement district bonds. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated Project Cost $11.2M City Contribution $2.9M Page 40 of 139 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The Project In 2016, Department of Natural Resources (DNR) parceled and sold 230 acres bounded by Road 84, Road 68, Argent Road and the Franklin County Irrigation District (FCID) canal, and I-182. The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies the Chapel Hill Boulevard corridor through this area as a connection from Road 100 to Road 68. Preliminary design work has been prepared which proposes a section that accommodates all users from pedestrians and cyclists to passenger vehicles and delivery trucks. Proposed Process Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) are a means of assisting benefiting properties in financing needed capital improvements through the formation of special assessment districts. Special assessment districts provide the opportunity for improvements to be financed and paid for over a period of time through assessments on the benefiting properties. Resolution No. 3829 By Resolution No. 3829 approved April 2, 2018, the City Council declared its intention to order the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76. Resolution No. 3829 fixed May 7, 2018 at 7:00 pm, local time, in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall for the Public Hearing. Further, Resolution No. 3829 ordered the notification of involved property owners. On May 7, 2018, Council moved to continue the Public Hearing until a date to be announced in the future with at least 2 weeks notice to property owners. August 6, 2018 was selected as the appropriate date. V. DISCUSSION: The design and construction of this project is currently estimated to be at $8.7 million, with up to $2.45 million for financial elements like escrow, guaranty fund, and financing cost. Staff has consulted with experts in the LID process and found that an LID is appropriate for use in this situation. A special benefit analysis was recently conducted which demonstrated that the benefits of the project accrued to the parcels within the proposed LID boundary exceed the cost of the project and the projected assessments. Therefore, it is beneficial to move forward with the LID. The preliminary assessment roll was prepared using the Special Benefit Analysis method, rather than the Mathematical method. With the Special Benefit Analysis method, an appraiser calculates the value of each parcel with and without the proposed improvement. The mathematical method involves division of improvement costs based on lineal front-footage or area. The Special Benefit Analysis method was selected due to the subject parcels varying size and zoning type. This provides for a more equitable Page 41 of 139 preliminary assessment. The two major zoning types in this LID are commercial and residential. There is greater benefit to commercial property values with the construction of a road because access to these properties is vital to their economic development. Therefore, properties with commercial uses typically see greater benefit and higher assessment values than residential properties. Staff has met with interested property owners with the goal of getting consensus on the path to move forward. The plan presented this evening is the result of dialogue and compromise regarding LID costs and elements for a solution that benefits both the property owners and the City. Page 42 of 139 CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO.34p)a cy A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE IMPROVEMENTS OF CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD FROM ROAD 68 TO ROAD 84, INCLUDING THE INTERSECTION WITH ROAD 76) AND TO CREATE A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO ASSESS THE COST AND EXPENSE OF CARRYING OUT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SPECIALLY BENEFITTED THEREBY; NOTIFYING ALL PERSONS WHO DESIRE TO OBJECT TO THE IMPROVEMENTS TO APPEAR AND PRESENT THEIR OBJECTIONS AT A HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON MAY 7, 2018; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER PROPERLY RELATED MATTERS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, as follows: Section 1. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, to order the improvement of the property within the area described in Exhibit A, by the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard (from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76). The improvements are more fully described in Exhibit B, and consist of full roadway improvements, including road construction to three lane and five lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, and landscaping (collectively, the Improvements"). The referenced Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. All of the foregoing Improvements shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the City Engineer of the City and may be modified by the City as long as that modification does not affect the purpose of the improvements. Section 2. The total estimated cost and expense of the Improvements is declared to be 10,700,000, of which an estimated $9,600,000 shall be borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by the Improvements to be included in a local improvement district to be established and embracing as nearly as practicable all the property specially benefited by the Improvements. Actual assessments may vary from estimated assessments as long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value the Improvements add to the property. Section 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of the adoption of this resolution and of the date, time and place fixed herein for the public hearing to each owner or reputed owner of any lot, tract, parcel of land or other property within the proposed local improvement district by mailing such notice at least fifteen days before the date fixed for public hearing to the owner or reputed owner of the property as shown on the rolls of the Franklin County Assessor at the address shown thereon, as required by law. Page 43 of 139 This resolution also shall be published in its entirety in at least two consecutive issues of the official newspaper of the City, the date of the first publication to be at least 15 days prior to the date fixed herein for the public hearing. Section 4. All persons who may desire to object to the Improvements are notified to appear and present those objections at a hearing before the City Council to be held in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, 525 N. 3rd Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at 7:00 p.m. on May 7, 2018, which time and place are fixed for hearing all matters relating to the Improvements and all objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the Improvements. All persons who object thereto should appear and present their objections at that hearing. Any person who may desire to file a written protest with the City Council may do so within 30 days after the date of passage of the ordinance ordering the Improvements in the event the local improvement district is formed. The written protest should be signed by the property owner and should include the legal description of the property for which the protest is filed and that protest should be delivered to the City Clerk. The City Engineer is directed to submit to the City Council on or prior to May 7, 2018, all data and information required by law to be submitted. The foregoing resolution was ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof this 2nd day of April, 2018. Matt atkins, Mayor ATTEST: idVA- WM.7(1) (-,( Daniela Erickson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 44 of 139 CERTIFICATION I,the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Pasco,Washington(the"City"),hereby certify as follows: 1. The attached copy of Resolution No.3Q7cc 9 (the"Resolution")is a full,true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at the regular meeting place thereof on April 2, 2018, as that resolution appears on the minute book of the City; and the Resolution will be in full force and effect immediately following its adoption; and 2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the meeting and a majority of the members voted in the proper manner for the adoption of the Resolution. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand this 211d day of April,2018. CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON 4 . % 0 Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Page 45 of 139 ii3 4-7 4 k.- k% 1 . ' A ' 4.tieiiiiiiiiPlAidt, 1.---... '.011,-,....,•14-'°- ..- - „,,,..__-_, ,_ -- 4 - 11 , 7)2.:;,-7-1 2 -' lialiii r _ 1E- 4•;it.„-,--0‘'m-~S'''I '' iiiiiiiiinffill1011111101110 BURDEN BLVD • ___,.... itz 4,&oilittiAkiiiht1411 i ' - I?II"Itr5.*''''T''-- ''' . 11 - •''fa' L., . A0DE0DR• r 1--- ti ' • , e.. .. M .."M- . ' tvindwri, - -4 A I 1 die 119E5 , N illikfel-i 44 VII ' A 64 gal. cc it I 0 ViS1 s . cc. It i 1 f 4 i i co it;la. ‘.1**' ''.1, • , 1.------- 11 . joiw.....x.....„ _...,...:,_ , VALLFY VIEW PL T I 1 1 4'"' 10)..... - aigim / 0- 4. • -NNW& 4 fie'-\\=---...,4 4, i, , pisr Argent Road ompgars- witi". ..! 7... ....7 z--'.. , , ik .1-"*"' 'I. ..... a.• 11. ... ':014I.1 ''''... d Chapel Hill Boulevard LID Area Exhibit APage 46 of 139 1 t I- TRAIL 'LANDSCAPE TRAVEL LANE 1 _CENTER LANE I TRAVEL LANE --I LANDSCAPE'SIDEWALK 12' Chapel Hill Boulevard Three Lane Section t i,l- M AallIMIII tmmo TRAIL ILANDSCAPa._ TRAVEL LANE I TRAVEL LANE CENTER LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE _LANDSCAPE I SIDEWALK Chapel Hill Boulevard Five Lane Section Exhibit B Page 47 of 139 /Users/erleworley/Documents/Pasco/Copy of 2018-04-13 Preliminary Assessment Roll Chapel Hill Blvd.xlsx 8/1/18 City of Pasco Chapel Hill Boulevard LID ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS Design and Construction Chapel Hill Boulevard - Road 68 to Road 76*$3,763,517 Chapel Hill Boulevard - Road 76 to Road 84*$4,263,951 Subtotal $8,027,468 * Includes 8.6% sales tax on Utilities, 15% Contingency, 12% Design Engineering, 13% Constr. Admin DNR Right-of-Way Purchase $690,000 (2525’ x 50’ (north side) + 929’ x 50’ (south side) = 172,700 sq feet (3.97 acres) X $4.00/sf) LID Cost 3.0% LID Financing Cost (w/out DNR ROW)$240,824 Interim Finacing $320,000 Establishment of Escrow $931,000 LID Guarantee Fund - 10% (w/out DNR ROW)$951,929 Subtotal $2,443,753 Total Project Cost - (PE, RW, CN, Financing)$11,161,221 Less City Contribution 5-lane Upgrade - Rd 76 to 68 $253,952 Roundabout Upgrades $1,000,000 LID Guarantee Fund $951,929 Traffic Impact Fee Credit (DNR ROW)$690,000 Subtotal $2,895,881 Total LID Cost to be Assessed (w/ Interim Financing)$8,265,340 Total LID Cost to be Assessed (w/out Interim Financing)$7,945,340 Note: The costs provided above are for information only. Estimated project costs are subject to change based on the selected scope of improvements. Page 48 of 139 -1- CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, relating to full roadway improvements that includes road construction to three-lane and five-lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, and landscaping (collectively, the “Improvements”); ordering the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, all in accordance with Resolution No. 3829 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 150, and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvements; providing that payment for the improvements be made by special assessments upon the property in the District, payable by the mode of “payment by bonds;” and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and local improvement district bonds. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. RECITALS AND FINDINGS. 1.1 By Resolution No. 3829 adopted April 2, 2018, the City Council declared its intention to order the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, with full roadway improvements that includes road construction to three-lane and five-lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, bike lanes and landscaping. Resolution No. 3829 fixed May 7, 2018, at 7:00 p.m., local time, in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall as the time and place for hearing all matters relating to the proposed improvement and all comments thereon and objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the improvement (the “formation hearing”). The hearing was continued to August 6, 2018 at 7:00 p.m., local time, in the City Council Chambers of the City Hall. 1.2 The City Engineer caused an estimate to be made of the cost and expense of the proposed improvements and certified that estimate to the City Council, together with all papers and information in his possession touching the proposed improvement, a description of the boundaries of the proposed local improvement district and a statement of what portion of the cost and expense of the improvement should be borne by the property within the proposed district. The Engineer’s estimate is accompanied by a diagram of the proposed improvement showing thereon the lots, tracts, parcels of land, and other property which will be specially benefited by the proposed improvement and the estimated cost and expense thereof to be borne by each lot, tract and parcel of land or other property. Page 49 of 139 -2- 1.3 Due notice of the formation hearing was given in the manner provided by law, or such notice was waived by property owners as needed. The formation hearing was held by the City Council on the dates and at the time above-mentioned, and all objections to the proposed improvement were duly considered by the City Council. All persons appearing at such hearing and wishing to be heard were heard. 1.4 The City Council determines it to be in the best interests of the City that the improvement as hereinafter described be carried out and that a local improvement district be created in connection therewith. Section 2. IMPROVEMENTS ORDERED. The City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington (the “City”), orders the improvement of the properties within the area described in Exhibit B, by the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard as a principal arterial from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, to full roadway improvements that includes road construction to three-lane and five-lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, bike lanes and landscaping, as more particularly described in Exhibit A (the “Improvements”). The Improvements shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor prepared by the City Engineer, and may be modified by the City Council as long as such modification does not affect the purpose of the Improvements. Section 3. LID 150 CREATED. There is created and established a local improvement district to be called Local Improvement District No. 150 of the City of Pasco, Washington (the “District”), the boundaries or territorial extent of the District being more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 4. IMPROVEMENT COSTS ESTIMATED. The total current estimated cost and expense of the Improvements is declared to be $11.16 million. The Cost and expense of the Improvements shall be borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by such Improvements included in the District which embraces as nearly as practicable all property specially benefited by such Improvements. The City reserves the right under RCW 35.44.020 to exclude costs and expense of the Improvements from the cost and expense to be assessed against the property within LID 150 and may pay from any other moneys available therefor if the City Council so designates by ordinance at any time. Section 5. ASSESSMENT METHODS. In accordance with the provisions of RCW 35.44.047, the City may use any method or combination of methods to compute assessments which may be deemed to more fairly reflect the special benefits to the properties being assessed than the statutory method of assessing the properties. Actual assessments may vary from assessment estimates so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value the Improvements add to the property within the LID. Section 6. INTERIM AND BOND FINANCING AUTHORIZED. 6.1 Local improvement district warrants may be issued in payment of the cost and expense of the Improvements herein ordered to be assessed, such warrants to be paid out of the Local Improvement Fund, District No. 150, hereinafter created and referred to as the Local Page 50 of 139 -3- Improvement Fund, and, until the bonds referred to in this section are issued and delivered to the purchaser thereof, to bear interest from the date thereof at a rate to be established hereafter by the City’s Finance Manager, as issuing officer, and to be redeemed in cash and/or by local improvement district bonds herein authorized to be issued, such interest-bearing warrants to be hereafter referred to as “revenue warrants.” In the alternative, the City hereafter may provide by ordinance for the issuance of other short-term obligations pursuant to chapter 39.50 RCW. 6.2 If the City shall authorize expenditures to be made for such Improvements (other than for any cost or expense expected to be borne by the City) prior to the date that any short- term obligations or local improvement district bonds are issued to finance the Improvements, from proceeds of interfund loans or other funds that are not, and are not reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long-term basis or otherwise set aside to pay the cost of the Improvements herein ordered to be assessed against the property specially benefited thereby, the City declares its official intent that those expenditures, to the extent not reimbursed with prepaid special benefit assessments, are to be reimbursed from proceeds of short-term obligations or local improvement district bonds that are expected to be issued for the Improvements in the estimated principal amount not exceeding $11.16 million. 6.3 The City is authorized to issue local improvement district bonds for the District which shall bear interest at a rate and be payable on or before a date to be hereafter fixed by ordinance. The bonds shall be issued in exchange for and/or in redemption of any and all revenue warrants issued hereunder or other short-term obligations hereafter authorized and not redeemed in cash within twenty days after the expiration of the thirty-day period for the cash payment without interest of assessments on the assessment roll for the District. The bonds shall be paid and redeemed by the collection of special assessments to be levied and assessed against the property within the District, payable in annual installments, with interest at a rate to be hereafter fixed by ordinance under the mode of “payment by bonds,” as defined by law and the ordinances of the City. The exact form, amount, date, interest rate and denominations of such bonds hereafter shall be fixed by ordinance of the City Council. Such bonds shall be sold in such manner as the City Council hereafter shall determine. Section 7. CONSTRUCTION. In all cases where the work necessary to be done in connection with the making of such Improvements is carried out pursuant to contract upon competitive bids (and the City shall have and reserves the right to reject any and all bids), the call for bids shall include a statement that payment for such work may be made in cash warrants drawn upon the Local Improvement Fund or by check or other lawful instrument through the City LID Construction Fund, LID 150 Account, for and on behalf of the District. Section 8. LID FUND CREATED. The Local Improvement Fund for the District is created and established in the office of the City Finance Manager. The proceeds from the sale of revenue warrants or other short-term obligations drawn against the fund which may be issued and sold by the City and the collections of special assessments, interest and penalties thereon shall be deposited in the Local Improvement Fund. Cash warrants to the contractor or contractors in payment for the work to be done by them in connection with the Improvements and cash warrants in payment for all other items of expense in connection with the Improvements may be issued against the Local Page 51 of 139 -4- Improvement Fund. Alternatively, payment to the contractor or contractors may be made through the City LID Construction Fund, LID 150 Account, for and on behalf of the District. Section 9. LID NOTICE. Within 15 days of the passage of this ordinance there shall be filed with the City Clerk the title of the Improvements and District number, a copy of the diagram or print showing the boundaries of the District and the preliminary assessment roll or abstract of such roll showing thereon the lots, tracts and parcels of land that will be specially benefited thereby and the estimated cost and expense of such Improvements to be borne by each lot, tract or parcel of land. The City Clerk immediately shall post the proposed assessment roll upon her index of local improvement assessments against the properties affected by the local Improvements. The City may, but need not, give notice of the LID through other means, including but not limited to recording of this ordinance. PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Pasco, Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof, this 6th day of August, 2018. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Daniela Erickson, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 52 of 139 Exhibit A EXHIBIT A LID 150 – Chapel Hill Boulevard Street Improvements In – From – To Description In Street From To Chapel Hill Boulevard* Road 68 Road 84 * Including the intersection with Road 76 The LID 150 Improvements include full roadway improvements that includes road construction to three-lane and five-lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting and landscaping. Page 53 of 139 Exhibit B - 1 EXHIBIT B LID No. 150 –Improvements Legal description of the LID boundary: County Parcel # Legal Description 117510033 Lot 1 of Record Survey 1847849 117510036 Lot 4 of Record Survey 1847849 117510038 Lot 6 of Record Survey1847849 117510039 Lot 7 of Record Survey1847849 117510041 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 1 117510042 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 2 117510043 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 3 117510044 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 4 117510045 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 5 117510046 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 6 117510047 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 7 117510048 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 8 117510049 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 9 117510050 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 10 117510051 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 11 117510052 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 12 117510053 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 13 117510054 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 14 117510055 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 15 117510056 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 16 117510057 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 17 117510058 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 18 117510059 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 19 117510060 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 20 117510061 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 21 117510062 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 22 117510063 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 23 117510064 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 24 117510065 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 25 117510066 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 26 117510067 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 27 117510068 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 28 117510069 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 29 117510070 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 30 Page 54 of 139 Exhibit B - 2 117510071 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 31 117510072 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 32 117510073 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 33 117510074 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 34 117510075 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 35 117510076 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 36 117510077 Chiawana Heights Phase 1, Lot 37 117510078 LOT 3 OF RECORD SURVEY 1847849 EXCEPT CHIAWANA HEIGHTS PHASE 1 117510081 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 1 117510082 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 2 117510083 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 3 117510084 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 4 117510085 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 5 117510086 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 6 117510087 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 7 117510088 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 8 117510089 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 9 117510090 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 10 117510091 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 11 117510092 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 12 117510093 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 13 117510094 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 14 117510095 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 15 117510096 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 16 117510097 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 17 117510098 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 18 117510099 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 19 117510100 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 20 117510101 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 21 117510102 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 22 117510103 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 23 117510104 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 24 117510105 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 25 117510106 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 26 117510107 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 27 117510108 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 28 117510109 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 29 117510110 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 30 117510111 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 31 117510112 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 32 Page 55 of 139 Exhibit B - 3 117510113 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 33 117510114 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 34 117510115 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 35 117510116 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 36 117510117 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 37 117510118 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 38 117510119 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 39 117510120 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 40 117510121 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 41 117510122 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 42 117510123 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 43 117510124 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 44 117510125 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 45 117510126 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 46 117510127 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 47 117510128 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 48 117510129 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 49 117510130 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 50 117510131 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 51 117510132 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 52 117510133 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 53 117510134 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 54 117510135 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 55 117510136 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 56 117510137 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 57 117510138 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 58 117510139 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 59 117510140 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 60 117510141 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 61 117510142 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 62 117510143 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 63 117510144 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 64 117510145 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 65 117510146 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 66 117510147 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 67 117510148 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 68 117510149 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 69 117510150 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 70 117510151 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 71 117510152 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 72 117510153 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 73 Page 56 of 139 Exhibit B - 4 117510154 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 74 117510155 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 75 117510156 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 76 117510157 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 77 117510158 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 78 117510159 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 79 117510160 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 80 117510161 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 81 117510162 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 82 117510163 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 83 117510164 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 84 117510165 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Lot 85 117510166 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Tract A 117510167 Riverhawk Estates Phase 1, Tract B 117581010 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, WM, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE NORTH ROAD 84 PER THE RIGHT OF WAY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER 1869069 AND NORTHERLY OF THE LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ABOVE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 89°17’14”EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF 40.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH ROAD 84 PER THE RIGHT OF WAY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS FILE NUMBER 1869069, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY WASHINGTON; THENCE SOUTH 01°10’30”WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 547.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 78°49’30”EAST, 53.52 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 11°10’30”WEST, 800.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 67.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°58’44”EAST, 488.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 16°01’16”EAST, 1500.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 330.06 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86°35’10”EAST, 119.76 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 03°24’50”WEST, 1000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 68.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82°39’37”EAST, 130.61 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE RADIUS OF Page 57 of 139 Exhibit B - 5 WHICH BEARS SOUTH 07°20'23" WEST, 500.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SURVEY 50.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS AND EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF ABOVE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER. 117582019 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, WM, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY IRRIGATION DISTRICT CANAL, EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH ROAD 84 PER THE RIGHT OF WAY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR FILE NUMBER 1869069 AND SOUTHERLY OF THE LINE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ABOVE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 89°17’14”EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF, 40.01 FEET TO THE POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF NORTH ROAD 84 PER THE RIGHT OF WAY DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITORS; FILE NUMBER 1869069, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 01°10’30”WEST 547.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 78°49’30”EAST 52.52 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 11°10’30”WAST 800.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 67.66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73°58’44”EAST, 488.23 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 16°01’16” EAST 1500.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 330.06 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86°35’10”EAST 119.76 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 03°24’50”WEST 1000.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 68.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82°39’37”EAST, 130.61 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 07°20’23”WEST 500.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE 50.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINUS AND EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF ABOVE SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER. Page 58 of 139 CERTIFICATION I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Pasco, Washington (the “City”), hereby certify as follows: 1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. ____ (the “Ordinance”) is a full, true and correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City held at the regular meeting place thereof on August 6, 2018, as that ordinance appears on the minute book of the City; and the Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after the publication of its summary in the City’s official newspaper; and 2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the meeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the passage of the Ordinance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of , 2018. CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Page 59 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 30, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit: Location of a Church in a C-1 District (MF #SP 2018-006) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Report to Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 06/21/2018 and 07/19/2018 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.____, approving a special permit for the location of a church at 1103 West Court Street. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On June 21, 2018 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend approval for the location of a church at 1103 West Court Street (Parcel #113 384 320). Following the conduct of a public hearing the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to allow for the location of the church, and recommend approval of the Special Permit with conditions as contained in the July 19, 2018 staff report. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation was received. V. DISCUSSION: Page 60 of 139 The applicant, Tiempos de Poder, is seeking a special permit to allow the location of a church in 11,260 square feet of a multi-tenant commercial center at 1103 West Court Street. It is anticipated the church will use the space on Sunday afternoons from 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm and Friday evenings between 7:00 and 8:00 pm. The applicant has proposed a maximum capacity of between 300 and 400 congregants. The City Municipal Code Requires one parking space per four seats based upon maximum seating capacity; with 400 congregants, one hundred paved and striped parking spaces above and beyond those required for the other suites would be mandated for the church use. Page 61 of 139 VicinityMapItem: Church in a C-1 Zoning districtApplicant: Tiempos de Poder ChurchFile #: SP 2018-0060 1000 2000 3000 4000FeetSITEPage 62 of 139 Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO._______ A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE FOR THE LOCATION OF CHURCH AT 1103 WEST COURT STREET. WHEREAS, Tiempos de Poder submitted an application for the location of a church at 1103 West Court Street (Tax Parcel # 113 384 320); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 21, 2018 to review a Special Permit for the proposed church; and, WHEREAS, following deliberations on July 19, 2018 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Special Permit for location of the church with certain conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: 1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to Tiempos de Poder for a church in a C-1 Zoning district under Master File #SP 2018-006 with the following conditions: a. The space leased to the church must be maintained to conform with all “A” occupancy requirements of the International Building Code; b. The outside store front shall not be modified from its current condition with the exception of a sign installed in conformance with a City approved sign permit; c. The church shall not object to the transfer, renewal or issuance of a liquor license for an existing or new establishment within 1,000 feet of the property; d. The capacity of the church shall be based on availability of on-site paved and striped parking located on tax parcel #113 384 320, but in no case to exceed building rated capacity, as per City of Pasco Municipal Code. e. The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco business license is not obtained by December 1, 2018. 2. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 6th day of August, 2018. _______________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ _____________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 63 of 139 1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2018-006 APPLICANT: Tiempos de Poder HEARING DATE: 06/21/2018 1103 W Court St ACTION DATE: 07/19/2018 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church (Tiempos de Poder) in a C-1 District 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Parcel # 113 384 320: FOSTERS LOT 15, Block 8 & Together with a Portion of the south ½ of the Southeast ¼ of the Southwest ¼ of the Southeast ¼ of Section 19, Township 9, Range 30. General Location: 1103 West Court Street Property Size: Approximately 1.54 acres; suite approximately 11,260 square feet 2. ACCESS: The site has access from West Court Street and North 10th Avenue 3. UTILITIES: Municipal utilities currently serve the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-3 (General Business) and contains various commercial suites within the existing building. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-3– Multi-Family EAST: C-1—Commercial Tire Store SOUTH: R-1 – Captain Gray/Pasco High School Campus WEST: R-3 – Church 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for commercial uses. The Plan does not specifically address churches, but elements of the Plan encourage the promotion of orderly development including the development of zoning standards for off-street parking and other development standards. Policy LU-2-B of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the support of facilities for educational and cultural activities. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non- Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11-355). Page 64 of 139 2 ANALYSIS The applicant is seeking a special permit to allow the location of a church in a multi-tenant commercial center at 1103 West Court Street. Churches are defined in Pasco Municipal Code as “Unclassified Uses” which require a special permit prior to locating in any zone within the City. The applicant proposes to locate the church within Suite 1103 which occupies around 11,260 square feet of floor area inside the building. The site had been used previously for retail sales of clothing and furniture. It has since ceased operation. Surrounding uses include a tax preparation service, a barber shop/beauty salon, a drug store, and a health food store. The balance of the suites are currently vacant. A donut shop occupies a separate building on the adjoining parcel to the southwest. The proposed site has been developed with a commercial structure since 1955. The approximately 19,661 square foot building is divided into one larger suite (proposed for the church use) and nine smaller suites. The parcel contains 61 marked parking stalls in the front of the building along Court Street and an unmarked gravel parking lot to the rear of the building. It is anticipated the Tiempos de Poder Church will use the space on Sunday afternoons from 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm and Friday evenings between 7:00 and 8:00 pm. with between 300 and 400 church-goers in attendance. The City Municipal Code Requires one parking space per four seats based upon maximum seating capacity; one hundred spaces above and beyond those required for the other suites would be required for the church use with 400 congregants. The proposed use could generate around 414 vehicle trips on Sundays based on maximum occupancy for an 11,300 square foot building. About 1/3 of that space is office/classroom area, so that overall number may be reduced accordingly. Traffic generated by the church will occur mostly on Friday evening and Sunday afternoons. The operations of churches generally generate few complaints from adjoining property owners. A potential problem with a church locating in a commercial area is that some proximal businesses sell or serve liquor. There is a concern some churches may object to the approval of liquor licenses nearby. The issue is typically addressed by placing a condition on the Special Permit approval limiting the church’s ability to object to a liquor license. INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the Page 65 of 139 3 result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Churches are unclassified uses requiring review through the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district. 2. The proposed church site is zoned C-1 (General Business). 3. The proposed site is located at 1103 West Court Street. 4. The site is approximately 1.54 acres. 5. The site contains a 19,661 square foot building divided into one larger suite (proposed for the church use) and nine smaller suites. 6. The remainder of the strip mall contains 8,401 square feet of retail use which requires one space per 300 square feet, or 28 parking spaces. 7. The proposed tenant suite is around 11,260 square feet in floor area. 8. Applicant is anticipating between 300 and 400 congregants. 9. The City Municipal Code requires one parking space per four seats based upon maximum seating capacity; the church would need 100 spaces above and beyond those 28 required for the other suites for 400 congregants, or 67 additional spaces. 10. The site contains 61 paved/marked off-street parking stalls at the front of the site along West Court Street, and a gravel parking area to the rear of the building. 11. The main access to the site is from West Court Street. Secondary access is available from North 10th Avenue. 12. The proposed site has been developed with a commercial structure since 1955. 13. Church functions will occur on Sunday afternoons and Friday evenings, as indicated by the applicant. Page 66 of 139 4 CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 and determine whether or not the proposal: 1. Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Plan does not specifically address churches, but elements of the Plan encourage the promotion of orderly development including the development of zoning standards for off-street parking and other development standards. Policy LU-2-B of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the support of facilities for educational and cultural activities. 2. Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed use will have a minimal impact on public infrastructure. Churches are generally used during off-peaks hours, on Sundays and during evenings in the middle of the week. The church will use existing City utilities and infrastructure. 3. Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? Churches are typically located in or near residential areas. In this case, all surrounding land uses are of a commercial nature. The site would not be modified to appear any differently than retail businesses located in the same building. 4. Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The location and height of the existing structure has not discouraged the development of permitted uses on surrounding properties in the past. No exterior site modifications are proposed. Any prospective businesses seeking to locate within the vicinity will not be affected by the proposed church. 5. Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or Page 67 of 139 5 flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Churches are typically used infrequently, generally two or three days per week and generate traffic during off-peak times such as Sundays and in evenings during the week. Permitted uses in the C-1 zone include: Hotels and motels; Restaurants; Stores and shops for the conduct of retail business; Stores and shops for repair and similar services; Garage and filling stations; Membership clubs; and Theaters. Accommodating for anticipated traffic and parking will be the primary issues. 6. Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do not endanger public health or safety and are generally not nuisance generators. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The space leased to the church must be maintained to conform with all “A” occupancy requirements of the International Building Code; 2) The outside store front shall not be modified from its current condition with the exception of a sign installed in conformance with a City approved sign permit; 3) The church shall not object to the transfer, renewal or issuance of a liquor license for an existing or new establishment within 1,000 feet of the property; 4) The capacity of the church shall be based on availability of on-site paved and striped parking located on tax parcel #113 384 320, but in no case to exceed building rated capacity, as per City of Pasco Municipal Code. 5) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco business license is not obtained by December 1, 2018. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed special permit and adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the July 19, 2018 staff report. Page 68 of 139 6 MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Tiempos de Poder for the location of a church at 1103 West Court Street (parcel #113 384 320) with conditions as contained in the July 19, 2018 staff report. Page 69 of 139 VicinityMapItem: Church in a C-1 Zoning districtApplicant: Tiempos de Poder ChurchFile #: SP 2018-0060 1000 2000 3000 4000FeetSITEPage 70 of 139 Land UseMapItem: Church in a C-1 Zoning districtApplicant: Tiempos de Poder ChurchFile #: SP 2018-006MFDUsChurchChurchSFDUsCommercialSchoolSITEMFDUsSFDUSFDU0 1000 2000 3000 4000FeetSFDUsPage 71 of 139 ZoningMapItem: Church in a C-1 Zoning districtApplicant: Tiempos de Poder ChurchFile #: SP 2018-006R-3R-3R-3R-3R-1R-1R-1C-1C-10 1000 2000 3000 4000FeetSITEC-1Page 72 of 139 SitePage 73 of 139 Looking NorthPage 74 of 139 Looking EastPage 75 of 139 Looking SouthPage 76 of 139 Looking WestPage 77 of 139 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 21, 2018 C. Special Permit Location of a Church in a C-1 District (Tiempos de Poder) (MF# SP 2018-006) Chairwoman Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit for the location of a church in a C-1 district. The proposed site is in an existing multi-tenant commercial building in a strip mall. They are proposing to use roughly 11,000 square feet of the building for the church. The only complication for this application is the amount of parking that will be re quired. The applicant indicated there may be as many as 400 congregants and this site would not allow for the number of parking stalls required for a congregation of that size. Other parking arrangements may need to be made or conditions may need to be placed to limit the size of the congregation. Commissioner Myhrum asked if there were any fire code compliance issues with this structure. Mr. White responded none that staff is aware of at this time. If they were to proceed and develop, exiting and bathroom considerations will need to be developed based on their occupancy type. Francier Obando, 10305 Chapel Hill Boulevard, spoke on behalf of his application. Adriana Gonzalez, 3617 Lantana Drive, translated for Mr. Obando. She stated the 400 congregants was their goal but at this time they don’t have that large of a congregation. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Campos, to close the public hearing on the proposed special permit and set July 19, 2018 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. The motion passed unanimously. Page 78 of 139 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 19, 2018 C. Special Permit Location of a Church in a C-1 District (Tiempos de Poder) (MF# SP 2018-006) Chairwoman Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discu ssed the special permit application for the location of a church in a C-1 district. There were no changes to the staff report since the public hearing at the previous meeting. Commissioner A. Campos asked if the applicant was aware of the parking requirements. Mr. White said they were. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the July 19, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on findings of fact and conclusions as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Tiempos de Poder for the location of a church at 1103 West Court Street (Parcel # 113-384-320) with conditions as contained in the July 19, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Page 79 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 30, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Darcy Bourcier, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: The Parks at Riverbend (MF# PP 2018-004) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Resolution Overview Map Vicinity Map Preliminary Plat Report to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 5/17/18, 6/21/18 & 7/19/18 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.______, approving the Preliminary Plat for The Parks at Riverbend. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On May 17, 2018 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to develop a recommendation for the City Council on the preliminary plat for The Parks at Riverbend. The proposed plat is located at the southwest corner of Burns Road and Dent Road along the northern City limits. Following the hearing, the Planning Commission determined that with conditions, the preliminary plat should be recommended for approval. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached resolution. Page 80 of 139 No written appeal of the Planning Commission’s recommendation has been received. V. DISCUSSION: The proposed plat contains approximately 144 acres with 322 single family lots. The developer has proposed a lift station in the southernmost portion of the plat to serve the development with Municipal sewer when it is made available. Sewer must be extended to the site at the time the site is developed. The location of the proposed plat exceeds the adopted goal of 6 minute or less travel time for fire and/or emergency responders. A development agreement for contribution to relocate Fire Station #83 is necessary to address this issue. A traffic impact analysis must be prepared to address impacts on existing and proposed intersections, including Burns Road/Broadmoor Blvd, Burns Road/I Lane, and Burns Road/Dent Road. Improvement of portions of Burns Road to the north will be the responsibility of the developer of the proposed plat along with improvements for the extension of Dent Road. Page 81 of 139 RESOLUTION NO.______ A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE PARKS AT RIVERBEND WHEREAS, RCW 58.17 enables the City to uniformly administer the process of subdividing property for the overall welfare of the community; and, WHEREAS, owners and developers of property situated in a portion of Section 12, Township 9 North, Range 28 East, W.M., have requested approval of a preliminary plat; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and developed findings related thereto and said findings are hereby adopted by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission found the proposed plat promoted the general welfare of the community and recommended said preliminary plat be approved with conditions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That the preliminary plat for The Parks at Riverbend located in a portion of Section 12, Township 9 North, Range 28, East W.M., is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The developer shall install common “Estate” type fence/wall six-feet in height along Burns Road, Sandifur Parkway, and the extension of Dent Road as a part of the infrastructure improvements associated with the plat. The fence/wall should be constructed of masonry block. An alternate design may be considered by the Director of the Community Development Department. A fencing detail must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. Consideration must be given to a reasonable vision triangle at the intersection of streets. Following construction of the masonry fence/wall the City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep of the fence/wall. These fencing requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the final plat(s). A concrete mow strip shall be installed under any common fence as directed by the City Parks Division and shall be approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. 4. Excess right-of-way along Burns Road, Sandifur Parkway, and the extension of Dent Road must be landscaped. Said landscaping shall include irrigation, turf, and trees. Trees shall be planted at 50 foot intervals. The species of the trees will be determined by the Parks Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department and Planning Division prior to installation. Water usage for City right-of-way landscaping shall come from a source approved by the City of Pasco with the connection and meter fees paid for by the developer. 5. Phase 1 of the plat must include at least two entrances into the development area. 6. The sidewalks on Burns Road, Sandifur Parkway, and the extension of Dent Road shall be offset to accommodate the planting strip required in #4 above. Sandifur Parkway shall be designed to include bike lanes or paths. Page 82 of 139 7. The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $475 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. The City shall not accept maintenance responsibility for the landscaping abutting said streets until such time as all fees are collected for each phase that abut said streets. 8. Lots abutting Burns Road, Sandifur Parkway, and Dent Road shall not have direct access to said streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of deed restrictions or statements on the face of the final plat(s). 9. The developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of a utility LID for the installation of water/sewer facilities. 10. The covenants and restrictions must be approved by the Community Development Director and recorded prior to Final Plat approval. 11. A traffic impact analysis must be prepared to address impacts on existing and proposed intersections. The Public Works Department must approve the scope and results of the traffic analysis for impacts. Results and recommendations will be conditions of plat approval. 12. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 13. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: “The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD’s primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat.” 14. Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. 15. The final plat will contain 10-foot utility easements parallel to all streets. Additional easement will be provided as needed by utility providers. 16. To properly serve the proposed subdivision one or more pressure reducing valves may be needed. The design and installation of which is typically the responsibility of the developer. 17. Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped- accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses, except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements. 18. Water lines and fire hydrants are required to be looped. 19. Per PMC 12.36.050 the developer must extend all utilities to and through the subject parcel. 20. All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. 21. All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The Page 83 of 139 developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. 22. Storm water runoff and infiltration calculations must comply with the Storm Water Management Manual for Easter Washington, they must be provided for review and approval. Storm water calculations must be prepared, stamped, signed and dated by a currently licensed Professional Engineer registered in the State of Washington. 23. The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. 24. The developer is responsible for all costs associated with construction, inspection, and plan review service expenses incurred by the City Engineering Office. 25. The developer is responsible for installing irrigation lines, which shall be installed per City of Pasco Standard Detail 3-1. 26. Approval of the preliminary plat does not constitute approval of the proposed lift station location. All costs associated with the review of the developer’s proposal to relocate the regional lift station will be borne by the developer. 27. A development agreement for contribution to relocate Fire Station #83 is required to provide adequate emergency response to the subdivision. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 6th day of August, 2018. __________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ _____________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 84 of 139 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community OverviewMap Preliminary Plat: The Parks at RiverbendApplicant: Pahlisch HomesFile #: PP2018-004 ± SITE 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500Feet I-182Kohler RdBurns Rd Broadmoor BlvdChapel Hill BlvdDent RdCITY L IMITS Page 85 of 139 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS,AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community VicinityMap Preliminary Plat: The Parks at RiverbendApplicant: Pahlisch HomesFile #: PP2018-004 ± SITE 0 550 1,100 1,650 2,200275Feet Kohler RdBurns Rd Dent RdCITY L IMITS Shoreline RdPage 86 of 139 EPARKSMI"I'(I:LIIVIINl-\I(II"LI-\ILOCATEDwTHENE«/4orsscnou:2‘TOWNSHIP9NORTH,RANGE25EAST.wMcmrOFPASCOFRANKUNCOUNTV.WASHINGTONE%cwvorSITEM550EIPBSE‘TlVt‘VIOINITVMAPr'..:f...v.wcams»enemas»:zcwwecussmcmouhocxvMusMAM5EIaEML?>35Ma-4MAYTOXR-xmwbiusuvnzsmtmwxD___?vnmwcomzvsvxmsnnnivanvbswims12msrmmwMnovAkEA/~n.,|—-~.«~»»~=v~»Z».Tu;‘mHwowsnewonvvmz4S<Ir3sc1ozsuivsvok12$?mumcrunusrrsswukmvnsAAExIwnERw«nnAzznmow»vmwsszrsvsr?nznocuwnusznewLIVERBE{SATRmmEaxiusuuaurrwemvmexvorvmvVMINARYPLATFmIEPARIIDIVISIONLOCATEF!E:(.T/I-saw:aw-wswcPage 87 of 139 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2018-004 HEARING DATES : 5/ 17 /2018 6/21/2018 ACTION DATE : 7/19/2018 BACKGROUND APPLICANT : Pahlisch Homes 210 SW Wilson Av e Ste 100 B e nd , OR 97702 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: The Parks at Riverbend, (322-Lot Single-Family Subdivision). 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Le gal: Farm Unit 84, Irrigation Block 1 General Location: 3291 Burns Road, south of Burns Road and west of Dent Road Property Size: 144 Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 322 single-family lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 8,088 ft2 to 25,770 ft2 Average Lot Square Footage: 11,343 ft2 2. ACCESS: The property will have access from Burns Road and the future southward extension of Dent Road. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water service is located in Burns Road . Municipal sewer is not available at this time. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (Low -Density R esidential). Surrounding prope rties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: SOUTH: EAST: WEST County RT RT County -Single-Family -Quarry -Quarry, Vacant -Vacant 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for low-density residential development. According to the Comprehensive Plan , low-density residential developme nt means 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The c riteria for allocation under the future land use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II , page 17) e ncourages development of lands designated for low-density residential uses when or where sewer is available; the location is suitable for home sites; and there is a market d e mand for new home sites. Policy H-1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership, and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of Page 88 of 139 the community. Goal LU-2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this projec t. A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance is likely for this application based on a fire station mitigation and a traffic study (WAC 197-11-355). ANALYSIS The project site is located at the northwest corner of the City limits south of Burns Road and west of Dent Road. To the north lies the County subdivision of Spencer Estates and Eagle Crest and to the south is the quarry. The project site was annexed into the City in 1998 and zoned RT (Residential Transition), but was later rezoned to R-1 (Low-Density Residential) in December of 2017 in anticipation of a housing development. The proposed plat lies within the greater Broadmoor area and thus has been considered under the City's Broadmoor Master Plan. The Plan includes the 671-acre development site west of Broadmoor Blvd and illustrates the City's vision of a community that consists of mixed-use properties, retail complexes, single and multi-family residences, recreational opportunities, and open spaces. Consistent with the Broadmoor Master Plan, the plat lie s within a designated low-density residential section and the offers varied lot sizes for a range of housing options. In addition, the plat shows an east/west street that spans the development area, connecting it to future developments on both Dale Adams' property to the east and Horrigan Farms to the west. The proposed plat will provide additional lots within the Urban Growth Area (UGA) for single-family homes consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Broadmoor area is one of the few large remaining areas within the UGA to be developed. Municipal sewer is currently not available in the area and the City can give no definite timeline for future availability in the Broadmoor area. Given the size of the lots, septic systems are not an option. The developer has proposed a lift station in the southernmost portion of the plat to serve the development with sewer when it is made available. City engineers have been in correspondence with the developer regarding the placement of said lift station and whether or not providing sewer service to this development is feasible . That being said, the preliminary plat will be valid for a 5 year period following City Council approval. Municipal sewer must be extended to the site at the time the site is developed . 2 Page 89 of 139 Improvement of portions of Burns Road to the north will be the responsibility of the developer of the proposed plat along with improvements for the extension of Dent Road. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 322 residential lots. The lots vary in size from 8,088 ft2 to 25,770 ft2 . The average lot size is 11,343 ft2 • The proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the R-1 zoning on the site. The minimum lot size for the R-1 zone is 7 ,200 square feet. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets which will be dedicated. The south half of Burns Road along the development area will be fully improved with this subdivision. Improvements with this plat will also include the southerly extension of Dent Road which will connect with the proposed east/West Street that spans the plat. UTILITIES: Future plans for development require the installation of a 12" water main extending from Burns Road south through this Parcel near the eastern border. Provisions shall be made to incorporate this feature of the water utility into the design. All utility lines will be extended through the plat and must be guided by the Comprehensive Water, Sewer and Irrigation Plans. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not diminish the buildable area of the lots. There has been no finalized sewer plan for this area. The shown location of the lift station is considered reference only. Approval of the preliminary plat does not constitute approval of the proposed lift station location. All costs associated with the review of the developer's proposal to relocate the regional lift station will be borne by the developer. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of less than 300 feet on residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets. The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street. STREET NAMES: The proposed street names will be added to the face of the plat before it is recorded. 3 Page 90 of 139 IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines as part of the infrastructure improvements. The nearest City irrigation lines are in the Broadmoor Estates subdivision along Broadmoor Boulevard. May of the subdivision in the 1-182 Corridor built dry irrigations systems which were then latter connected to the City system. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04 .115(8) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/ developer must pay a water right fee in li eu thereof. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact:" Prevent Overcrowding: Density requirements of the R-1 zone are designed to address overcrowding concerns. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property in question be developed with 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Plat has a density of approximately 2.2 units per acre. No more than 40 percent of each lot is permitted to be covered with structures per the R-1 standards . Parks Opens Space/Schools: The developer proposes a total of 30.71 acres of open space associated with this plat. Approximately 23 acres of said open space is located at the southern end of the plat labeled as Tract 0 which will be undeveloped. The remaining open space consists of walking paths, a future clubhouse, and landscaped tracts. Park impact fee will be assessed at the time permits are issued for each house in the subdivision to help cover the cost of future parks. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new dwelling unit at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The Plat is laid out for single- family development as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density permitted under the Comprehensive Plan is 5 dwelling units per acre. The developer is proposing a density of 2.2 units per acre. The proposed 4 Page 91 of 139 development will include improvements to Burns Road and the extension of Dent Road. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to current City standards and to the standards of the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of all intersection will be installed with the construction of the road improvements. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the Plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. However, the location of the proposed plat exceeds the adopted goal of 6 minute or less travel time for fire and/ or emergency responders. A development agreement for contribution to relocate Fire Station #83 is necessary to address this issue. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This Preliminary Plat contains 322 residential building lots, providing an opportunity for the construction of 322 new dwelling units in Pasco. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitations, building height restrictions and building setbacks will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The streets through and adjoining the Plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by Burns Road and Dent Road. The Preliminary Plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review (The discussion under "Safe Travel" above applies to this section also). Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates the Plat site for low-density residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings: • The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. • The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within the Urban Growth Boundaries. • The site has various elevations with the most dramatic slopes in the eastern portion of the development area. • There is currently one single family dwelling on the site. • The site is not considered a critical area or a wetland. 5 Page 92 of 139 • The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for low-density residential development. • The proposed development is consistent with the City's Broadmoor Master Plan. • Low-density residential development is described in the Comprehensive Plan as two to five dwelling units per acre. • The site is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). • The developer is proposing 2.2 dwelling units per acre. • The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the advancement of programs that promote home ownership and development of a variety of residential densities and housing types. • The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the interconnection of neighborhood streets to provide for the disbursement of traffic. • The interconnection of neighborhood streets is necessary for utility connections (looping) and the provision of emergency services. • Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 3,220 vehicle trips per day . This substantial increase in traffic will require a traffic impact study for the mitigation of traffic at the intersections of Burns Road/Broadmoor Blvd, Burns Road/I Lane, and Burns Road/Dent Road. • The c urre nt traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the 1-182 Corridor when warranted. • The current park impact fee is $1,420 per dwelling unit. The fee can be reduced by 58 percent if a developer dedicates a five acre park site to the City. The dedication of a fully constructed park reduces the fee by 93 percent. • RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved. • The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012. • Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools. • The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner that does not injure, annoy, or endanger the comfort and repose of other property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during 6 Page 93 of 139 times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including houses. • The location of the proposed plat exceeds the adopted goal of 6 minute or less travel time for fire and/ or emergency responders. However, a relocated fire station is proposed near Road 68 and Sandifur Parkway that will provide-when it is constructed-emergency service to the site within the 6 minute goal. • The proposed plat will cause traffic control impacts internally and at several intersections with Burns Road and Burns Road/Broadmoor Blvd. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways , water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division . These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the PUD, the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable, Franklin County Irrigation District and Ben-Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. All new developments participate in establishing parks through the payment of park fees at the time of permitting. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed Plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for the looping of utilities and interconnectivity of streets as supported in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision will provide arterial street 7 Page 94 of 139 improvements along Burns Road and collector street improvements along Dent Road. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low-density residential development. Low-density residential development is described as 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Plan encourages the promotion of a variety of residential densities and suggests the community should support the advancement of programs encouraging home ownership. The Transportation Element of the Plan suggests major streets should be beautified with trees and landscaping. The Plan also encourages the interconnection of local streets for inter-ne ighborhood travel for public safety as well as providing for traffic disbursement. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have bee n adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. The subdivision also conforms with the City's Broadmoor Master Pla n. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations . The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have b een enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e., school impact fees are paid). (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. The proposed Plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will ensure the public use and interest are served. PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 8 Page 95 of 139 1 . No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The developer shall install common "Estate" type fence/wall six-feet in height along Burns Road, "E" Drive, and the extension of Dent Road as a part of the infrastructure improvements associated with the plat. The fence/wall should be constructed of masonry block. An alternate design may be considered by the Director of the Community Development Department. A fencing detail must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. Consideration must be given to a reasonable vision triangle at the intersection of streets. Following construction of the masonry fence/wall the City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep of the fence/wall. These fencing requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the final plat(s). A concrete mow strip shall be installed under any common fence as directed by the City Parks Division and shall be approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. 4 . Excess right-of-way along Burns Road, "E" Drive, and the extension of Dent Road must be landscaped. Said landscaping shall include irrigation, turf, and trees. Trees shall be planted at 50 foot intervals. The species of the trees will be determined by the Parks Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department and Planning Division prior to installation. Water usage for City right-of-way landscaping shall come from a source approved by the City of Pasco with the connection and meter fees paid for by the developer. 5. Phase 1 of the plat must include at least two entrances into the development area. 6 . Another street entrance is required at the east side of the plat south of "E" Drive . 7 . The sidewalks on Burns Road, "E" Drive, and the extension of Dent Road shall be offset to accommodate the planting strip required in #4 above. "E" Drive shall be designed to include bike lanes or paths. 8 . The developer /builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $4 7 5 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. The City shall not accept maintenance 9 Page 96 of 139 responsibility for the landscaping abutting said streets until such time as all fees are collected for each phase that abut said streets. 9. Lots abutting Burns Road, "E" Drive, and Dent Road shall not have direct access to said streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of deed restrictions or statements on the face of the final plat(s). 10. The developer must sign a non-protest agreement to the formation of a utility LID for the installation of water/ sewer facilities. 11. The covenants and restrictions must be approved by the Community Development Director and recorded prior to Final Plat approval. 12. A traffic impact analysis must be prepared to address impacts on existing and proposed intersections. The Public Works Department must approve the scope and results of the traffic analysis for impacts. Results and recommendations will be conditions of plat approval. 13. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 14. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/ or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat." 15. Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. 16. The final plat will contain 10-foot utility easements parallel to all streets. Additional easement will be provided as needed by utility providers. 17. To properly serve the proposed subdivision one or more pressure reducing valves may be needed. The design and installation of which is typically the responsibility of the developer. 18. Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped-accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. 10 Page 97 of 139 Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses, except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements. 19. Water lines and fire hydrants are required to be looped. 20. Per PMC 12.36.050 the developer must extend all utilities to and through the subject parcel. 21. All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. 22. All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. 23 . Storm water runoff and infiltration calculations must comply with the Storm Water Management Manual for Easter Washington, they must be provided for review and approval. Storm water calculations must be prepared, stamped, signed and dated by a currently licensed Professional Engineer registered in the State of Washington. 24. The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(8) and Section 3.07.160. 25. The developer is responsible for all costs associated with construction, inspection, and plan review service expenses incurred by the City Engineering Office. 26. The developer is responsible for installing irrigation lines, which shall be installed per City of Pasco Standard Detail 3-1. 27. Approval of the preliminary plat does not constitute approval of the proposed lift station location. All costs associated with the review of the developer's proposal to relocate the regional lift station will be borne by the developer. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the July 19, 2018 staff report. 11 Page 98 of 139 MOTION: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for the Parks at Riverbend with conditions as listed in the July 19, 2018 staff report. 12 Page 99 of 139 Overview Map Preliminary Plat: The Parks at Riverbend Applicant: Pahlisch Homes File#: PP2018-004 N A Page 100 of 139 Vicinity Map Preliminary Plat: The Parks at Riverbend Applicant: Pahlisch Homes File#: PP2018-004 N A Page 101 of 139 Land Use Map Preliminary Plat: The Parks at Riverbend Applicant: Pahlisch Homes File#: PP2018-004 I I zBurns-Rd (f) __ ___.__~------' ::::r o ___ -r-' -s CD :::J CD I ~ 1 I Agriculture SFDU 0 275 550 1, 100 1,650 2,200 w w Feet Vaca'nt Quarry N A Page 102 of 139 Zoning Map Preliminary Plat: The Parks at Riverbend Applicant: Pahlisch Homes File#: PP2018-004 ~--Burns-Rd (/} __ _J_.----~ ::::::r o ___ , ~ CD :::J CD county I I ;u c.. 0 275 550 1, 100 1,650 2 ,200 w w Feet RT RT N A RS-1 Page 103 of 139 1~~ ~~~~~ ~1 ~~\#~~~~~[D) D ~~~~~~ ~o@ I , '.t=:. I, frt-"i r ! FRAN KL"' ~ ~ COIMTY PRELIMINARY PLAT LOCATED IN THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH , RANGE 28 EAST. W.M. CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUN TY , WASHINGT ON 'Ii ol"'-\,.~·,,c r-O~~~~t,('1)1 .. I DENlROA0 ~1 :'· 1 r ; ;~;; ~EN:RO~<r5 ""'~ I .. "\ [·' \-1·1·I Jr 1·1 -1-1·1u ,; R '·-. :,u¢ · '""""e • \ .. 1 • J • ~ I • J · · J I J I o;l,t:-1\~,..~--....... ,. .• ~ ~~~ :Pl "'\fV""~--iG'"; i :• ,'II'"~,.. .,Ike'.~~~ ;v._'bl"',,to\J;, • i v lt.:.~ '~!'I" ~trr~'il'~~ ~Cf' •f.,,,,<i!t -~ rJtf..'": .._\\j..·~o~~ •'1' ~I .--~ ,~o I ~~...._, ,~ ~ -(SC.I'\."°'~~"°'~" ,.ii-'· !. I ~ ! j l ?)GS~$ .,.1,,L "i,Cdf'--'>op 00 ,,(fo's: I:. ' ~ I]~ -::._.. ,R I CITY OF SITE PASCO VIC INITY MAP OWNE R ENGINEE R ZO NING CLASSIFICATION· ROCKY HILLS MANAGEMENT LP PBS -JASON MATTOX R·1 (LOW DENSITY RESIDENT IAL) 10723 WCOJRT ST 'OOBRADLEY BLVD. SUITE 10!5 7.200 SF MIN1MUMLOT AREA ) PASCO, WA 99301 RICHLAhO. WA 99352 (5Qg1)9'2-1el00 DEVELOPER · p~ ~ PB S ·ALEXANDER MATARAZZO 400 BRADLEY Bl.VO, SUITE 1oe RtCHLANO. WA W352 (541 ) m-01•2 (509) 042-1eoo ·ll'tQCONfOUJI """ llJ..~ ( ,,,.,,s~111! ,...--.,i'C'' wiru.. LANO USE TABLE •OM P•\OlK :90$ol..CllllU UN0£VU.Of't0 1 ALL LOTS SHAU H AVE A 10' UTI LITY EASEMENT ABUTTING ANY AIGHT·OF·WAY 2 CONTOUR INTERVAL• 5· "*Ol"[•fYlllf€ ,~. t~~:· ' 'U~$4NfA!n KWtlt\ll'T &TATl()tf ,. ' ., s ( ·:-. j J~ • .,. .-:.·e ~ <r-~· . ,. "~,, . . t~ ..... -1 :~(QPfl). ~· _,,.,_ ~-~ ..... "'-'!--:. .... -.:--~ :___~"'~.-,; .. ; .~--=-·--.=. ----,,;.--.. ______ "-";,.- ..... n .. , •l.1$1- / '~ I' § '•'j Ji fi1 . :l vn t ~ a. Pa c z w en 0::: <i w ::_ >~ -<( 0::: ~ 0 I-~ <(:;: :c (/) ~ Cr:~ 0 o~w u. "" ... ... I.I.. <( :3 """"' g a.. '""' ..J ir a.. ~ <( iii ~w~ ::::; "'T"" ~ w ...... ::> g: I-~ '® ... ....,, ... . e11 .... ,.. ... CMllCKll°' A • Jl#l'l!H11 H~1000 IHllU 1 <W Page 104 of 139 ..c +-' L-o z tlO c ·-~ 0 0 ....J Page 105 of 139 +-' (/) ro UJ bO c ·-~ 0 0 _J Page 106 of 139 ·-~ 0 0 _J Page 107 of 139 \ ·-~ 0 0 _J \ \ \ \\ ' \ \\ Page 108 of 139 -1- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 5/17/2018 PUBLIC HEARINGS: B. Preliminary Plat The Parks at Riverbend, 322-lots (Pahlisch Homes) (MF# PP 2018-004) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Darcy Bourcier, Planner I, discussed the preliminary plat application for The Parks at Riverbend, 322-lots. The plat is located at the northwest corner of the city limits, south of Burns Road and west of Dent Road. This property was rezoned from RT (Residential Transition) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) in December 2017. The plat will include 322 single-family lots that will range in size from 8,000 sqft-25,000 sqft, providing a variety of housing. There will be 30 acres of open space associated with this plat - 23 acres of which will be undeveloped land at the south end of the plat. There will be a system of walking paths, a clubhouse and other landscape tracts. Staff believes is conforms to the Broadmoor Master Plan and is an appropriate use of the land. The Broadmoor Master Plan is a 671 acre development site the City is designing for a community of mixed-use properties, retail and recreational opportunities. On the plat itself, there is a proposed east to west street that will connect the development to future development on either side of this plat. City sewer is not currently available to the site. Staff cannot give an estimated date of sewer service. The developer has proposed a lift station in the southern portion of the plat to serve the development with sewer when it’s made available. This plat cannot be developed until city sewer is in the vicinity. Commissioner Roach asked if platting this site premature before adopting new ordinances regarding lot size frontage which is scheduled on the agenda. Ms. Bourcier said no. The proposed lots are larger than the lot frontages proposed in the memo. These lots are zoned R-1, which isn’t under consideration for the proposed frontage changes so it wouldn’t apply to this plat. Commissioner Roach stated that Staff isn’t recommending a frontage change in the R-1 zone but Planning Commission may suggest a frontage change in the R-1. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, stated that nonetheless, the plat application was submitted and will be considered under what the rules are at the time of submittal. Commissioner Roach asked for further clarification. Mr. White replied that it is vesting. In Washington State, when an application is submitted, that applicant is vested within the current development regulations. Commissioner Portugal asked if the larger lots up to 25,000 sqft would be eligible for septic. Page 109 of 139 -2- Ms. Bourcier replied no. The City is not considering any septic systems. Commissioner Bowers said the plan on the presentation is slightly different than the one they received in their packet. Ms. Bourcier clarified the discrepancies – the direction of the map was different. Chad Bettesworth, Pahlisch Homes, 210 SW Wilson Avenue, Ste. 100, Bend, OR spoke on behalf of his application. He explained their plans and the types of communities they build. He showed a brief video of their developments to the Planning Commission. Jason Maddox, PBS Engineering & Environmental, 400 Bradley Boulevard, Richland, WA spoke on behalf of the technical and engineering aspect of this project as the project manager. Rick Alderidge, 7216 Byers Road, addressed his concern with traffic as a result of this development. He asked what would be done to fix the traffic. He stated he wasn’t against the development itself. David McDonald, City Planner, stated that Burns Road and Road 100 were both arterial streets and as the community develops those streets will be developed to arterial street standards and will no longer remain two-lane roads. The City will require the developer to install the infrastructure as it develops to provide for the traffic in the future. The City has worked with the State for studies to accommodate the additional traffic. Chairman Cruz added that a lot was learned through the Road 68 experience and changes have been made. Geoffrey Krug, 540 McDonald Drive, stated that water is needed in the area for agriculture. He cautioned the use of irrigation water. Mr. Bettesworth addressed the concern about roads and traffic. He stated they would be built and improved as development occurs. Water is allotted in with the Bureau of Reclamations water allocations and it meets their standards. With no further questions or comments the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Campos, to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and set June 21, 2018 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. The motion passed unanimously. Page 110 of 139 -3- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 6/21/2018 OLD BUSINESS: A. Preliminary Plat The Parks at Riverbend, 322 lots (Pahlisch Homes) (MF# PP 2018-004) Chairwoman Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Darcy Bourcier, Planner I, discussed the preliminary plat for The Parks at Riverbend. The plat had changed since the Planning Commission last saw it. Staff was working with the developer to get the details sorted out but there are still items left to be determined; such as right-of-way, estate fencing and traffic mitigations. The Engineering Department is also working on a timeline for the lift station to supply sewer to the area. Staff recommended continuing this item to the next meeting. Commissioner Bowers asked for clarification on a vacant piece of property on the plat. Ms. Bourcier responded that the grade of the “open space” was likely too steep to develop. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, added that the portion of land left to be undeveloped was mined and has significant slope issues. However, once the pumping from the mining stops, the land will fill with water and be an amenity to the community. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to continue the preliminary plat for The Parks at Riverbend, to the July 19, 2018 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Page 111 of 139 -4- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7/19/2018 OLD BUSINESS: B. Preliminary Plat The Parks at Riverbend, 322-lots (Pahlisch Homes) (MF# PP 2018-004) Chairwoman Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Darcy Bourcier, Planner I, discussed the preliminary plat for The Parks at Riverbend, 322-lots. Items were added to the staff report including a mitigated determination of non-significance based on a relocation of a fire station and a traffic study. The plat exceeds the goal of a 6 minute travel time for emergency responders. To solve the issue, the developer must sign a development agreement to contribute in the relocation of Fire Station #83 to Sandifur Parkway and Road 68. A traffic study will also need to be completed for several intersections. The plat doesn’t have access to city sewer at this time. There is a lift station proposal in progress but approval of this plat does not automatically approve the lift station in its current proposed location. Commissioner Greenaway asked if the application was in agreement with the conditions. Ms. Bourcier said yes. Commissioner Mendez moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, to adopt finding of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the July 19, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Myhrum moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the preliminary plat for The Parks at Riverbend with conditions as listed in the July 19, 2018 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Page 112 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR:City Council July 24, 2018 TO:Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM:Steve Worley, Director Public Works SUBJECT:Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policy I.REFERENCE(S): Resolution for the Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policy Copy of Greenhouse Gas Report 2015 II.ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ___________ approving the Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policy. III.FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In 2009, the Legislature approved the State Agency Climate Leadership Act establishing greenhouse gas emission reduction limits for state government. The act directs state agencies to track, report, and reduce their greenhouse gases. Agencies are working to reduce their emissions from electricity use, fuel consumption, business travel, and employee commuting. State, regional and local governments throughout the United States are adopting energy conservation programs and policies designed to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and the need for imported oil, as well as reduced energy bills, improved air quality and traffic congestion. V.DISCUSSION: Funding agencies, such as the Washington State Public Works Board, Transportation Page 113 of 139 Improvement Board, etc., have determined that policies addressing greenhouse emissions, are deemed necessary. As a means to encourage the adoption of such policies by local governments the Washington State Public Works Board has made adopting a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policy a requirement for submitting an application for Public Works Trust Fund monies The proposed resolution will satisfy the funding agency requirement and acknowledge that the policies will benefit the City of Pasco and aid in the reduction of greenhouse gases. The attached resolution is non-binding and references policies and practices in a number of operational areas, most all of which are already in practice here in one form or another. Staff has reviewed the proposed resolution and, therefore, recommends approval of the Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policy. This Item was discussed at the July 23, 2018 Council Workshop. One of the questions brought up at the workshop pertained to how Pasco compared to other cities throughout the state related to greenhouse gas emissions. Based on county data from the WA Department of Ecology’s 2015 Greenhouse Gas Report Franklin County comprises approximately 0.30% of the Total Emissions of the state’s largest greenhouse gas sources. Benton County comprised 0.77%. See attached. More information about Washington’s efforts on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction can be found at the following link: https://ecology.wa.gov/Air-Climate/Climate-change/Tracking-carbon-pollution Page 114 of 139 RESOLUTION NO. __________ A RESOLUTION of the City of Pasco, Washington endorsing and adopting Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Policies. WHEREAS, state, regional and local governments throughout the United States are adopting energy conservations programs and policies; WHEREAS, local governments can help reduce greenhouse gas emission through the implementation of programs and policies that promote reduced energy bills, green space preservation, air quality improvements, reduced traffic congestion, improved transportation choices, among other policies; WHEREAS, as a part of overall policy considerations, policies addressing greenhouse emissions, are deemed necessary, and the Washington State funding agencies have made adopting a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policy a requirement for submitting an application for certain grant and loan programs; THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policy adopted. The policies and/or procedures attached hereto as Exhibit "A" are adopted as the City of Pasco's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policy to satisfy the Washington State Public Works Board requirement and to recognize that the policies will benefit the City of Pasco and will help in reducing greenhouse gases. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular Meeting this 30th day of July, 2018. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Lee Kerr, City Attorney Page 115 of 139 City of Pasco, Washington Resolution No. ______ – Exhibit “A” Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO. ___________ – Exhibit “A” GREEN HOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTION POLICIES A.PUBLIC BUILDINGS 1.All new publicly funded buildings should be models of cost-effective, energy- efficient design. 2.Encourage energy conservation practices in buildings by raising awareness of employee energy use. B.EMPLOYEES 1.Encourage ride-sharing, van-pooling and the use of public transit. C.FLEET / VEHICLES 1.Consider energy-sensitive fleet vehicle replacements, to include alternate energy sources such as electricity, diesel or bottled gas, fuel-efficient vehicles. 2.Consider methods to reduce pollutants from transportation activities, including the use of cleaner fuels and vehicles, efforts to reduce vehicle idling time. D.PURCHASING 1. Consider purchasing practices and standards to support reductions in GHG emissions, including preferences for energy-efficient office equipment, and the use of recycled materials and manufacturers that have implemented green management practices. 2.Review bidding standards and contracting practices that encourage GHG emissions reduction. E.EQUIPMENT 1.Manage street lighting needs by applying lighting standards and using lamps that will assure safe and effective illumination at minimum cost and energy use. 2. Maintain the efficiency of pumps in water and sewer systems, and operate them at peak efficiency. F.WASTE REDUCTION / USE 1.Where and when allowed by the uniform building code, encourage the use of building construction materials made from recycled and recyclable materials. 2.Reduce GHG emissions waste through improved management of waste handling and reductions in waste generation. G.LAND USE 1.Encourage development patterns that utilize existing infrastructure; reduce the need for new roads, utilities and other public works in new growth areas; and enhance non-automobile transportation. 2.Whenever possible, urban development should occur only where urban public facilities and services exist or can be reasonably made available. Page 116 of 139 City of Pasco, Washington Resolution No. _____ – Exhibit “A” Page 2 of 2 H.LAND USE 1.Protect and enhance the environment and public health and safety when providing services and facilities. 2. Conserve natural resources such as water and vegetation to minimize energy used and GHG emissions and to preserve and promote the ability of such resources to remove carbon from the atmosphere. I.PUBLIC EDUCATION / OUTREACH 1.Consider energy conservation actions to raise public awareness of the value of wise energy use. 2.Continue providing a recycling program to reduce the amount of waste produced. 3. Coordinate outreach efforts with other agencies to align messages on topics such as: o Energy efficiency and conservation, and green energy; o Trip reduction, public transit, carpooling, vanpooling, and alternative modes of transportation; o Green building and energy-efficient design; o Waste reduction, recycling, and composting; o Water conservation and water-efficient design and products; o Benefits of buying local, and information about locally grown, prepared, and manufactured goods and local services. J.TRANSPORTATION 1.Consider transportation projects that will contribute to a reduction in vehicle miles traveled per capita, while maintaining economic vitality and sustainability. 2.Provide safe and convenient access for pedestrians and bicyclists to, across, and along major transit priority streets. 3.Consider signal timing programs providing emissions reduction benefits. 4.Support voluntary, employer-based trip reduction programs, through the local transit service K.UTILITIES 1.Establish a water conservation plan. 2. Encourage water-efficient landscapes and irrigation, including: Drought-tolerant and native species, and covering exposed dirt with moisture-retaining mulch; Water-efficient irrigation systems and devices, including advanced technology such as moisture-sensing irrigation controls; Edible landscapes that provide local food. Page 117 of 139 Source County Total Emissions (MT CO2e)Sector Sub Sector Cowlitz County Landfill - Longview Cowlitz 4,533 Waste Municipal Landfills Jorgensen Forge Corp. - Tukwila King 5,321 Metals Iron and Steel Production Michelsen Packaging - Yakima Yakima 9,296 Pulp and Paper Other Pulp and Paper SEH America, Inc - Vancouver Clark 9,615 Manufacturing Electronics Manufacturing Spectrum Glass Company - Woodinville King 10,750 Minerals Glass Production Boulder Park Generating Station - Spokane Valley Spokane 10,952 Power Plants Other Power, Heating, or Cooling Plants Horse Heaven Cattle Feeders, Inc. - Sunnyside Yakima 11,142 Food Production Cattle Feedlots Sonoco Products Company - Sumner Pierce 11,464 Pulp and Paper Other Pulp and Paper Northwest Hardwoods Inc. - Mount Vernon Skagit 11,648 Wood Products Lumber Mills SGL Automotive Carbon Fibers LLC - Moses Lake Grant 12,338 Manufacturing Transportation Northwest Pipeline Willard C/S - Cook Skamania 12,443 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression Central Washington University - Ellensburg Kittitas 12,838 Government Education Northwest Pipeline C/S - Goldendale Klickitat 12,873 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression Naval Air Station Whidbey Island - Oak Harbor Island 13,388 Government National Security Starbucks Kent Flexible Plant - Kent King 13,542 Food Production Other Food Products Northwest Hardwoods Inc. - Centralia Lewis 13,572 Wood Products Lumber Mills Seattle-Tacoma International Airport - Seattle King 13,660 Government Other Government Paramount Petroleum - Seattle King 13,688 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Other Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Northwest Pipeline Roosevelt C/S - Bickleton Klickitat 13,756 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression REG Grays Harbor LLC - Hoquiam Grays Harbor 13,806 Chemicals Other Chemicals Fairchild AFB - Spokane Co.Spokane 14,053 Government National Security Darigold - Chehalis Lewis 14,732 Food Production Dairy Products Tacoma City Solid Waste Facility - Tacoma Pierce 14,812 Waste Municipal Landfills Easterday Ranches North Feedlot - Eltopia Franklin 15,048 Food Production Cattle Feedlots U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Site - Richland Benton 15,494 Government Other Government Northwest Pipeline C/S - Washougal Clark 15,534 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression The Boeing Company: DC/MFC - Seattle King 15,614 Manufacturing Transportation Frito Lay - Vancouver Clark 15,923 Food Production Other Food Products ConAgra Foods Lamb Weston/BSW - Warden Grant 16,271 Food Production Potato Products Northwest Hardwoods Inc. - Longview Cowlitz 16,772 Wood Products Lumber Mills Puget Sound Energy - Frederickson Generating Station - Tacoma Pierce 17,052 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants The Boeing Company - Renton King 17,191 Manufacturing Transportation Rainier Veneer, Inc. - Spanaway Pierce 17,378 Wood Products Engineered Wood Vertellus Performance Chemicals LLC - Elma Grays Harbor 17,600 Chemicals Other Chemicals Great Western Malting Company Limited - Vancouver Clark 18,273 Food Production Other Food Products Biofuels Washington, LLC Landfill Gas to Energy Plant - Graham Pierce 19,534 Power Plants Other Power, Heating, or Cooling Plants Imerys Minerals Quincy Plant - Quincy Grant 19,541 Minerals Other Minerals Naval Base Kitsap Bangor - Silverdale Kitsap 20,166 Government National Security Boeing Commercial Airplanes - Fabrication (Frederickson Site) - Puyallup Pierce 20,833 Manufacturing Transportation Darigold - Sunnyside Yakima 21,372 Food Production Dairy Products Darigold - Lynden Whatcom 21,437 Food Production Dairy Products The Boeing Company: Boeing Plant 2 - Seattle King 21,499 Manufacturing Transportation Easterday Ranches South Feedlot - Kennewick Benton 21,519 Food Production Cattle Feedlots Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc Plant #02 - Kalama Cowlitz 22,223 Minerals Glass Production Cathcart Landfill - Snohomish Snohomish 23,520 Waste Municipal Landfills El Oro Cattle Feeders, LLC - Moses Lake Grant 25,752 Food Production Cattle Feedlots Horn Rapids Sanitary Landfill - Richland Benton 26,870 Waste Municipal LandfillsPage 118 of 139 Simplot Feeders LTD. - Burbank Walla Walla 29,065 Food Production Cattle Feedlots Inland Empire Paper Company - Spokane Spokane 29,097 Pulp and Paper TMP Mills Northwest Pipeline C/S - Chehalis Lewis 29,670 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression Moses Lake Facility of Basic American Foods - Moses Lake Grant 31,063 Food Production Potato Products Waste Management Greater Wenatchee Regional Landfill - East Wenatchee Douglas 31,208 Waste Municipal Landfills Goodrich Spokane Landing Systems, Carbon Products - Spokane Spokane 31,264 Manufacturing Transportation Hampton Lumber Mills Washington Inc. - Morton Lewis 31,789 Wood Products Lumber Mills Linear Technology Corporation - Camas Clark 33,622 Manufacturing Electronics Manufacturing SDS Lumber Company - Bingen Klickitat 34,173 Wood Products Lumber Mills Cheyne Landfill - Zillah Yakima 34,450 Waste Municipal Landfills The Boeing Company - Auburn King 36,058 Manufacturing Transportation ConAgra Foods Lamb Weston - Richland Benton 36,252 Food Production Potato Products ConAgra Foods Lamb Weston - Connell Franklin 36,801 Food Production Potato Products Puget Sound Energy - Whitehorn Generating Station - Blaine Whatcom 37,884 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants ConAgra Foods Lamb Weston - Quincy Grant 37,922 Food Production Potato Products CertainTeed Gypsum - Seattle King 38,141 Manufacturing Gypsum Manufacturing Sierra Pacific Industries - Centralia Lewis 40,254 Wood Products Lumber Mills Grant County Landfill 1 - Ephrata Grant 40,606 Waste Municipal Landfills Olympic Panel Products LLC - Shelton Mason 41,324 Wood Products Lumber Mills Naval Base Kitsap - Bremerton Kitsap 42,287 Government National Security Interfor US, Inc. - Port Angeles Clallam 42,807 Wood Products Lumber Mills Solvay Chemicals, Inc. - Longview Cowlitz 44,254 Chemicals Hydrogen Production Vaagen Bros. Lumber, Inc. - Colville Stevens 44,422 Wood Products Lumber Mills J.R. Simplot Company - Moses Lake Grant 44,568 Food Production Potato Products Ponderay Newsprint Company - Usk Pend Oreille 44,680 Pulp and Paper TMP Mills Weyerhaeuser Raymond Lumber - Raymond Pacific 46,229 Wood Products Lumber Mills Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC - Tacoma Pierce 46,906 Manufacturing Gypsum Manufacturing ConAgra Foods Lamb Weston - Pasco Franklin 48,162 Food Production Potato Products Northwest Pipeline C/S - Sumner Pierce 50,469 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression Hampton Lumber Mills Washington Inc. - Randle Lewis 54,461 Wood Products Lumber Mills Boise Cascade Wood Products, LLC. Kettle Falls Lumber - Kettle Falls Stevens 57,294 Wood Products Lumber Mills Washington State University - Pullman Whitman 57,370 Government Education Linde Gas North America LLC - Anacortes Skagit 59,516 Chemicals Hydrogen Production King County Solid Waste Cedar Hills Landfill - Maple Valley King 63,395 Waste Municipal Landfills Air Liquide Hydrogen Plant - Anacortes Skagit 64,413 Chemicals Hydrogen Production Northwest Pipeline C/S - Mount Vernon Skagit 65,776 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression Boeing Commercial Airplanes - Everett Snohomish 66,276 Manufacturing Transportation Northwest Pipeline C/S - Snohomish Snohomish 66,543 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression Emerald Kalama Chemical, LLC - Kalama Cowlitz 69,126 Chemicals Other Chemicals Enwave - Seattle King 71,009 Power Plants Other Power, Heating, or Cooling Plants Boise Cascade Wood Products, LLC. Kettle Falls Plywood - Kettle Falls Stevens 71,151 Wood Products Engineered Wood Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. - Wallula Walla Walla 74,580 Food Production Meat Products Graymont Western US. Inc. - Tacoma Pierce 76,402 Minerals Lime Manufacturing Ardagh Glass Inc. - Seattle King 76,674 Minerals Glass Production McCain Foods - Othello Adams 77,566 Food Production Potato Products US Army Joint Base Lewis-McChord - Pierce Co.Pierce 78,742 Government National Security H.W. Hill Landfill Gas Power Plant - Roosevelt Klickitat 80,421 Power Plants Other Power, Heating, or Cooling Plants University of Washington Seattle Campus - Seattle King 82,430 Government Education Land Recovery Landfill Industrial - Graham Pierce 83,094 Waste Municipal LandfillsPage 119 of 139 Gas Transmission Northwest Compressor Station 6 - Rosalia Whitman 84,805 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression Hampton Lumber Mills Washington Inc. - Darrington Snohomish 87,598 Wood Products Lumber Mills J.R. Simplot Company - Othello Adams 87,686 Food Production Potato Products Cardinal FG Company - Winlock Lewis 105,474 Minerals Glass Production Terrace Heights Landfill - Yakima Yakima 109,385 Waste Municipal Landfills Northwest Pipeline C/S - Sumas Whatcom 109,422 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression Gas Transmission Northwest Compressor Station 8 - Wallula Walla Walla 111,325 Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Natural Gas Transmission/Compression REC Silicon - Moses Lake Grant 114,372 Metals Other Metals Nucor Steel Seattle, Inc, - Seattle King 115,173 Metals Iron and Steel Production Puget Sound Energy - Fredonia Generating Station - Mount Vernon Skagit 115,727 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants Kaiser Aluminum Washington, LLC (Trentwood Works) - Spokane Valley Spokane 117,856 Metals Other Metals U.S. Oil & Refining Co. - Tacoma Pierce 128,434 Refineries Petroleum Refineries Puget Sound Energy - Encogen Generating Station - Bellingham Whatcom 143,119 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants Agrium Kennewick Fertilizer Operations (KFO) - Kennewick Benton 155,888 Chemicals Nitric Acid Production WaferTech LLC - Camas Clark 172,725 Manufacturing Electronics Manufacturing Cowlitz County Headquarters Landfill - Castle Rock Cowlitz 190,202 Waste Industrial Landfills Nippon Paper Industries USA Co LTD (NPI USA) - Port Angeles Clallam 223,631 Pulp and Paper TMP Mills Spokane Waste to Energy Facility - Spokane Spokane 226,238 Waste Solid Waste Combustion Roosevelt Regional Landfill - Roosevelt Klickitat 248,507 Waste Municipal Landfills Sierra Pacific Industries - Aberdeen Grays Harbor 249,544 Wood Products Lumber Mills Puget Sound Energy - Sumas Generating Station - Sumas Whatcom 282,703 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants Sierra Pacific Industries - Burlington Division - Mount Vernon Skagit 307,168 Wood Products Lumber Mills Alcoa Wenatchee Works - Malaga Chelan 331,207 Metals Aluminum Production Puget Sound Energy - Ferndale Generating Station - Ferndale Whatcom 405,726 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants PacifiCorp Energy - Chehalis Generating Facility - Chehalis Lewis 445,152 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants Ash Grove Cement Company - Seattle King 495,030 Minerals Cement Production Frederickson Power LP - Tacoma Pierce 496,752 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants Puget Sound Energy - Goldendale Generating Station - Goldendale Klickitat 551,705 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants Port Townsend Paper Corporation - Port Townsend Jefferson 572,693 Pulp and Paper Kraft Mills Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LLC - Camas Clark 663,149 Pulp and Paper Kraft Mills Puget Sound Energy - Mint Farm Generating Station - Longview Cowlitz 685,789 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants River Road Generating Plant - Vancouver Clark 708,077 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants Phillips 66 Ferndale Refinery - Ferndale Whatcom 747,276 Refineries Petroleum Refineries Kettle Falls Generating Station - Kettle Falls Stevens 826,454 Power Plants Other Power, Heating, or Cooling Plants Boise Paper - Wallula Walla Walla 855,520 Pulp and Paper Kraft Mills RockTenn Tacoma Mill - Tacoma Pierce 1,135,442 Pulp and Paper Kraft Mills Cosmo Specialty Fibers Inc - Cosmopolis Grays Harbor 1,170,393 Pulp and Paper Sulfite Mills Grays Harbor Energy Center - Elma Grays Harbor 1,170,621 Power Plants Natural Gas Turbine Plants Alcoa Intalco Works - Ferndale Whatcom 1,195,786 Metals Aluminum Production Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC - Anacortes Skagit 1,280,696 Refineries Petroleum Refineries Nippon Dynawave - Longview Cowlitz 1,502,988 Pulp and Paper Kraft Mills Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc/KapStone Kraft - Longview Cowlitz 1,708,673 Pulp and Paper Kraft Mills Shell Puget Sound Refinery - Anacortes Skagit 1,946,151 Refineries Petroleum Refineries BP Cherry Point Refinery - Blaine Whatcom 2,093,437 Refineries Petroleum Refineries TransAlta Centralia Generation LLC - Centralia Lewis 5,665,101 Power Plants Coal Plants 33,389,104 Percent of Total for Franklin County 0.30% Percent of Total for Benton County 0.77%Page 120 of 139 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 6, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 8/6/18 FROM: Bob Metzger, Police Chief Police Department SUBJECT: Electronic Traffic Control I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance RLC Memo 07/03/18 RLC Memo 07/24/18 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Ordinance No.___________, creating a New Section 10.22 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled "Automated Traffic Camera Systems", and amending Section 1.02.020 entitled " Initiation of Civil Infraction Proceedings" and further, to authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: This presentation is to follow up on the July 2018 discussion of photo enforcement through the use of traffic safety cameras for traffic related enforcement at certain intersections. Since this discussion staff has conducted further research on the vendor and has worked with Engineering to address council questions. Attached is a memo from Engineering on intersection safety. V. DISCUSSION: Staff looked further into the vendor more specifically of the issues around a contract Page 121 of 139 with the City of Chicago. The attached information details what occurred and the results of the DOJ investigation. The CEO at the time and staff from the City of Chicago are currently in prison for their role in what occurred. The DOJ completed their review of the company and determined that the misconduct associated with this case was by an individual and not consistent with company policy. The company has since implemented major changes in operations to designed to eliminate the deficiencies which allowed for the misconduct. DOJ has approved said changes and concluded it investigation. From this review staff is confident that what occurred in Chicago was an isolated incident carried out by one individual and without the knowledge or involvement of the company. It should also be noted that this investigation did not indicate any misappropriate use of the monitoring equipment. The attached memo from engineering discusses at length the issues with intersection safety and ways to improve this. Engineering solutions, while possible, would also be time consuming and expensive. In the meantime the population of this area will continue to grow and the use of this intersection will increase. As concluded in this report electronic traffic control is a viable option for this, especially in the short term. A long term solution will continue to be reviewed. Staff is seeking feedback from council and direction as to how to proceed. Page 122 of 139 Page 123 of 139 Page 124 of 139 Page 125 of 139 Page 126 of 139 Page 127 of 139 Page 128 of 139 Memo To: Robert Metzger, Chief of Police cc: Steve M. Worley, Public Works Director Dan Ford, City Engineer From: Mary Heather Ames, Senior Engineer Date: July 3, 2018 Re: Intersection Safety and Red Light Enforcement Cameras _______________________________________________________________________ This memo is written to discuss methods for increasing transportation safety at signalized intersections. We consider two intersections specifically: 20th & Court and Road 68 & Burden Boulevard. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS In keeping with the goal of traffic engineering to allow people and goods to travel safely and efficiently, traffic signals are a form of intersection control commonly used for high volume intersections. The primary function of a traffic signal is to “signal” drivers when it is their turn to proceed through the intersection, thereby preventing unwanted conflicts (crashes, collisions, or even “near misses”) between different movements through the intersection. The decision to install a traffic signal is not made lightly. Traffic signals should only be installed after an engineering study, including a signal warrant analysis, is performed which covers vehicle volumes and classification, geometry, speeds and other information. This process is guided by the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and involves the evaluation of warrants, which detail specific circumstances for signal installation. Similarly, modifications to an existing signal should only made as the result of careful engineering judgement. SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS When considering safety of an intersection, we analyze the number and type of crashes or collisions that happen at an intersection within a period of time. If there are trends that show a common crash type, an engineer may suggest a solution that is targeted to that crash type. But, if no particular trends emerge and we wish to generally reduce the overall number of crashes at an intersection, the next step is to try to change driver behavior. It has been suggested that increasing the “yellow” time of a signal phase may help. However, when drivers learn the new yellow time length, the benefit may disappear. All Public Works Engineering Page 129 of 139 signals employ a few seconds of “all red” during each cycle, and that span of time may be increased as well – but in that case the overall delay of the signal increases and the level of service drops. This can be done if absolutely necessary, but defeats the goal of traffic engineering, which is to move people and goods safely and efficiently. INTERSECTION RECONFIGURATION Another way to increase safety at an intersection may be to completely reconfigure the intersection. Roundabouts, for example, reduce the severity of crashes by slowing traffic down and limiting the angle of conflict to glancing type collisions. When selecting a roundabout as intersection control, we must consider various factors such as traffic volumes and their relative proportion on each leg of the intersection, available right-of- way for the larger footprint that a roundabout requires, and life cycle cost of the intersection. We may also consider adding lanes to an intersection to increase volumes through the intersection, and thereby potentially decrease driver frustration and increase overall safety. This typically takes more money and time, and may require the purchase of right- of-way. If there is a specific type of collision to address, this may be the issue to focus on. However, to increase overall safety, the benefit to cost ratio may not support the proposed effort. For example, if the project costs millions of dollars to design and build, it is important to determine if the proposed ‘fix’ is worth it. Will the improvement be more expensive than the economic benefit received from the improvement? Reconfiguration of an intersection not only takes money and space, it also takes time. Before construction can even begin, we would need to establish funding for the project and ensure that we have necessary right-of-way, which can take several years depending on grant cycles and negotiations. At the Burden Boulevard and Road 68 intersection, we may also need to collaborate with the state and federal regulators of I -182. Then, when working on established intersections, construction itself can take several weeks and affect circulation patterns around the intersection during that time. This effect should be considered when deciding to modify an intersection. RED LIGHT ENFORCEMENT CAMERAS Using cameras at signalized intersections to enforce the red light is one of the safest and most efficient ways to address driver behavior. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) conducted a study in 2005 to evaluate the safety of red-light cameras. Overall, they found that the use of red light cameras decreases the occurrence of right -angle crashes and increases rear end ones. By applying an economic analysis to the crash rates, they show a modest benefit to the use of red light enforcement cameras. PROPOSED INTERSECTIONS When considering intersection safety, a crash rate of 1.0 per million entering vehicles or less is widely viewed to be acceptable. At crash rates of 2.86 per million entering vehicles for the 20th Avenue and Court Street intersection and 1.20 per million entering vehicles at the intersection of Road 68 and Burden Boulevard, data for these intersections show that red light cameras are highly likely to be effective at increasing overall safety. Red light cameras have been shown to be most effective at high volume intersections, and these are two of the highest in the City. Page 130 of 139 We should note, however, that the intersection of 20th & Court was recently upgraded and modified with new signal timings and lane configuration which is intended to improve safety and efficiency at the intersection by reducing conflicts and wait times. The crash rates we cite are pre-reconfiguration and we expect them to improve. This intersection is still a good candidate for enforcement cameras because of the high volume of vehicles entering and leaving the intersection each day. ALTERNATE ROUTES The grid-like street system around the 20th Avenue and Court Street intersection allows drivers to circumvent the intersection, should they wish to avoid the area. The intersection at Road 68 & Burden Boulevard could also be avoided through the use of other City streets, however if the driver is wishing to travel north/south across I-182, options are limited and inefficient. An overpass in the vicinity of Road 76 has been discussed, but at an estimated cost of tens of millions of dollars, the overpass may not be constructed for many years. This area has been the subject of analysis and study relating to congestion relief, and any improvements or modifications to the street network will be in accordance with our twin goals of safety and efficiency. EXPERIENCE IN OTHER CITIES Numerous other cities have used red light enforcement cameras to increase intersection safety. Within Washington State, greater than 25 jurisdictions have employed this method to affect driver behavior and increase safety for the traveling public. Many of these jurisdictions have websites with information about their programs, detailing the process and locations for enforcement, as well as the successes of their programs. For example, the City of Fife cites a 30% decrease in collisions at key intersections and the City of Seattle noted a decrease in serious collisions during their pilot period. On this side of the state, Spokane shows a decrease of 23.75% in collisions, with a remarkable 50.62% decrease in “t-bone” or right angle crashes at the subject intersections. CONCLUSION Red light cameras appear to be a viable method for increasing safety at the subject intersections. Page 131 of 139 Memo To: Robert Metzger, Chief of Police cc: Steve M. Worley, Public Works Director Dan Ford, City Engineer From: Mary Heather Ames, Senior Engineer Date: July 18, 2018 Re: Intersection Safety and Red Light Enforcement Cameras _______________________________________________________________________ This memo is a follow up to recent Council discussions regarding intersection safety and red light enforcement cameras at two of our intersections: 20th & Court and Road 68 & Burden Boulevard. ALTERNATIVES TO CAMERA ENFORCEMENT As staff has reviewed the crash data and researched this issue, it seems apparent that the running of red lights at these two intersection is motivated by driver frustration (i.e. the driver wishes to get through the light on the current cycle, rather than having to wait for another green light). Therefore, the mitigation or alternative ideas presented below are targeted to reducing delay at the subject intersection(s). Each option is shown in a schematic drawing attached to this memo. 20th Avenue and Court Street The recent 20th Avenue Safety Improvements project at 20th Avenue and Court Street attempted to address this problem by converting signal timing from split phase to a more efficient and safer operation of protected/permitted phasing. The signal cycle length was also optimized, reducing it from 105 seconds to 85 seconds. A future project to further decrease delay at the intersection could be the construction of a roundabout at 20th Avenue and Court Street. Such construction would require a long funding process, purchase of right-of-way, and careful temporary traffic control during 6-9 months of construction. Road 68 & Burden Boulevard The Road 68 & Burden Boulevard intersection suffers from uneven traffic volumes on its four legs with a heavy movement between the east leg of Burden Boulevard and the south leg of Road 68. Lane utilization is not optimal, as cars “stack up” in the right lanes of both movements. This is especially problematic on Burden Boulevard where vehicles in the outside (or right hand) left turn lane prevent access to the inside left turn lane. These factors cause greater delay through the intersection and in turn, increase driver Public Works Engineering Page 132 of 139 frustration. For this intersection, we considered a tiered approach to the solution, building on Option 1 for Option 2 and so on. Option 1 – Improved lane utilization on the westbound to southbound and southbound through movements of the intersection will be addressed through improved striping and signage modifications to the intersection. Pavement markings, increased signage on which lanes go where, and a shift in channelization will allow drivers to more equally use the existing lanes, thereby increasing the number of cars through the intersection, thus reducing delays. We will also address traffic on Burden Boulevard through the construction of Wrigley Drive between Clemente Lane and Convention Drive. This will shift a portion of traffic from the east leg of the intersection to north leg providing a better equalization of traffic, which in turn makes the intersection operate more efficiently. Option 2 – This option adds an additional southbound lane from north of Burden Boulevard through the intersection to the westbound I-182 onramp. We would also increase queueing length for both westbound to southbound lanes on Burden Boulevard (making Clemente Lane right-in/right-out). This option would require purchase of right-of- way and careful coordination with businesses to minimize impacts. Option 3 – Ultimately, we would like to work with WSDOT to reconfigure the Road 68 interchange to a diverging-diamond interchange, which in conjunction with options 1 and 2 will significantly decrease delay and therefore, driver frustration. This option is the most costly, and would require coordination with the state, a long funding process, and careful traffic control during a two-year-long construction. Cost and Implementation Time for Alternatives to Camera Enforcement Option Time Required Cost 20th Avenue & Court Street Roundabout 5 years $$$$ Road 68 & Burden Boulevard Option 1 1 year $$$ Option 2 5 years $$$$ Option 3 15 years $$$$$$$ CRASH RATES PRE- AND POST-IMPLEMENTATION One of the most thorough studies regarding electronic enforcement of signalized intersections and their effect on crash rates and types was completed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in 2005. This study used data from seven jurisdictions across the United States to estimate the crash effects of red light camera systems. The results were consistent with those of other studies: decreased right-angle crashes and increased rear end ones. Below are two tables for reference. The first shows right-angle crashes and rear end crashes with and without electronic enforcement: Page 133 of 139 Table 1. Combined results for seven jurisdictions Right-angle crashes Rear end crashes Total crashes Definite injury Total crashes Definite injury Empirical Bayes estimate of crashes expected in the after period without RLC 1,542 351 2,521 131 Count of crashes observed in the after period 1,163 296 2,896 163 Estimate of percentage change (standard error) - 24.6 (2.9) - 15.7 (5.9) 14.9 (3.0) 24.0 (11.6) Estimate of the change in crash frequency - 379 - 55 375 32 Note: A negative sign indicates a decrease in crashes. The second table shows percent change for each of the jurisdictions studied: Table 2. Results for individual jurisdictions for total accidents. Jurisdiction number* (in random order) Percent change in right-angle crashes (standard error) Percent change in rear end crashes (standard error) 1 - 40.0 (5.4) 21.3 (17.1) 2 0.8 (9.0) 8.5 (9.8) 3 - 14.3 (12.5) 15.1 (14.1) 4 - 24.7 (8.7) 19.7 (11.7) 5 - 34.3 (7.6) 38.1 (14.5) 6 - 26.1 (4.7) 12.7 (3.4) 7 - 24.4 (11.2) 7.0 (18.5) *The identification of jurisdictions is not provided because of an agreement with the jurisdictions; such information is irrelevant to the findings. Note: A negative sign indicates a decrease in crashes. The executive summary for this study can be found at the following URL: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/reasearch/safety/05049/ INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Another Councilmember question was related to the Level of Service (LOS) of all the intersections in the City and how these two intersections compare to the City’s overall condition. Currently, the City does not have a comprehensive LOS analysis of all intersections. Therefore, comparing these two intersections to all others in the City is difficult. A Level of Service analysis for the whole City will be included in next year’s planned Transportation Master Plan. This master plan will provide the requested information. Page 134 of 139 Page 135 of 139 Page 136 of 139 Page 137 of 139 Page 138 of 139 Page 139 of 139