HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018.06.25 Council Workshop PacketWorkshop Meeting
AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m.
June 25, 2018
Page
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:
4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
3 - 4 (a) Public Facilities District Board Interviews
Council to conduct brief interviews with Marie Gillespie, Jesus Melendez,
Kirt Shaffer and Joseph Roach.
(b) Municipal Court Presentation
Presented by Dot French, Court Administrator
(c) Financial Status Report
Presented by Richa Sigdel, Finance Director
5 - 14 (d) Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) Risk Pool Update
Presented by Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
15 - 19 (e) Resolution Authorizing Sale of City Property; Disposal Options
20 - 26 (f) Complete Streets Policy Ordinance
27 - 31 (g) Draft Council Goals for 2018-2019
(h) All-America City Update
5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
6. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
7. ADJOURNMENT.
Page 1 of 31
Workshop Meeting June 25, 2018
REMINDERS:
1. 4:00 p.m., Monday, June 25, Ben-Franklin Transit Office, Hanford Area Economic
Investment Fund Committee Meeting (COUNCILMEMBMER PETE SERRANO,
Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.)
2. 6:00 p.m., Monday, June 25, Pasco City Hall, Conference 1, Special Meeting, Old
Fireman Pension Board (MAYOR WATKINS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER
MALONEY, Alt.)
3. 7:30 a.m., Wednesday, June 27, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd – Visit Tri-Cities Board
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER PETE SERRANO, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER
CRAIG MALONEY, Alt.)
4. 4:00 p.m., Thursday, June 28, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd – TRIDEC Board Meeting.
(COUNCILMEMBER DAVID MILNE, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER CRAIG
MALONEY, Alt.)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and
streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance.
Page 2 of 31
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 20, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/25/18
FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: Public Facilities District Board Interviews
I. REFERENCE(S):
Applications (Council only)
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council to conduct brief interviews with Marie Gillespie, Jesus Melendez, Kirt Shaffer
and Joseph Roach.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Public Facilities District Board is composed of five members; terms are for four
years. The Board meets quarterly.
The Public Facilities District Board oversees operation of the Pasco Public Facilities
District and payment of Pasco's share of a spec ial state sales tax grant intended for
"regional centers," in partnership with the Kennewick Public Facilities District for the
Three Rivers Convention Center. It may also acquire, construct, operate and maintain
any qualified regional public facility.
At the present time, there is one vacancy on the Board due to the election
Councilmember Maloney to the City Council last November.
After Council Screening Committee review of all applications, the following have been
selected to interview for possible appointment:
1. Marie Gillespie
2. Jesus Melendez
3. Kirt Shaffer
4. Joseph Roach
Page 3 of 31
Previously, members of the PFD Board were limited by the PFD Charter which
provided that: "Members may be reappointed to serve not more than three consecutive
full terms." The reappointment limitation was repealed in May. Three current
members of the Board have each served more than three consecutive full terms: Mark
Morrissette, President; Leonard Dietrich, Vice President and Spence Jilek. Rather than
being reappointed, their terms were extended pending reappointment or the
appointment of a replacement. It is recommended that each member now be
reappointed to new terms with the following duration, corresponding to their original
appointments, in order to maintain a staggering of terms:
1. Mark Morrissette: Term expires: 7/14/2020
2. Spence Jilek: Term expires: 7/14/2021
3. Leonard Dietrich: Term expires: 7/14/2022
As the regular term expiration for the vacant seat was 7/2018, it is recommended that
the new appointment be for a term to 7/14/2022.
V. DISCUSSION:
After conduct of interviews at the June 25 Workshop meeting, it is proposed that an
appointment be made at the July 2 meeting.
Page 4 of 31
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 20, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/25/18
FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA) Risk Pool Update
I. REFERENCE(S):
Pasco 2013 - 2017 Risk Profile
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation to Council
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City has been a member of the Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA), a
self insurance risk pool of about 170 Washington cities and special purpose
districts/entities, since 1986. The Authority is created by an interlocal agreement
between the several entities and provides members with options for liability and
property damage coverage in addition to several specialized coverages (cyber, boiler
and machinery, special events, etc.) The City's participation is limited to liability
(general and automobile) plus cyber coverage. The City has found that property
coverage rates are more favorable with a local commercial broker as many natural
hazard coverage costs can be minimized through underwriting (flood and earthquakes).
In addition to coverage for liability exposures, WCIA also provides risk management
consulting and training to assist members. As virtually all cities and most special
districts have similar exposures, the Authority can offer services which are essentially
custom developed for the City's needs.
The presentation is designed to provide Councilmembers with an introduction to the
Insurance Authority as well as to provide a review of the City's claim experience over
the five year period of 2013 - 2017.
Page 5 of 31
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 6 of 31
For the Period: 1/1/2013 - 12/31/2017
Risk Profile | City of Pasco
WCIA Member: Since 5/1/1986
Page 7 of 31
This is a summary report, which compares your actual losses to expected losses based on your percentage of worker hours to other members in the same actuarial group as
of 12/31/2017. The data analyzed in the risk profile covers claims with date of loss from 1/1/2013 through 12/31/2017. The number of claims shown indicates all claims and
lawsuits reported to WCIA whether they were paid, denied or tendered to another entity. The dollar amounts shown include: 1) INDEMNITY PAYMENTS (paid to
claimants/plaintiffs), 2) LEGAL FEES (attorney fees and related expenses) and 3) CURRENT RESERVES on any open claims/lawsuits as of 12/31/2017. Please keep in mind,
any losses filed, payments made or reserves changed after 12/31/2017 may impact the identified loss trends.
Using this report, members can better understand the risks they may encounter, evaluate their losses in relation to the losses experienced by their peers, and modify their
practices based on loss history to enhance services and minimize liability exposure.
Actuarial Group 4
Risk Profile | City of Pasco
Of note, information provided in the Risk Profile is different from that used in the calculation of a member’s liability assessment.
ACTUARIAL GROUP 4 Members (20)
> 400,000 Worker Hours Per Year
Auburn (AU)Bothell (BL)Edmonds (ED)
Issaquah (IS)Kennewick (KW)Kirkland (KI)
Lacey (LA)Lakewood (LW)Longview (LO)
Marysville (MA)Mercer Island (MI)Moses Lake (MS)
Mount Vernon (MV)Olympia (OL)Pasco (PA)
Port Angeles (PO)Puyallup (PU)Richland (RI)
Tukwila (TK)Walla Walla (WA)
Page 2Page 8 of 31
Expected vs. Actual | City of Pasco
Claim Type
Actuarial Group 4
Claims Count
1/1/2013-12/31/2017
Pasco 1/1/2013-12/31/2017
Expected Claim
Count
Actual Claim
Count
Exceeds
Expected
Claim Type
Actuarial Group 4
Total Incurred
1/1/2013-12/31/2017
Pasco 1/1/2013-12/31/2017
Expected Total
Incurred
Actual Total
Incurred
Exceeds
Expected
Expected Claim Count = [Actuarial Group Claim Count] X [% of Member Worker Hours]Expected Total Incurred = [Actuarial Group Total Incurred] X [% of Member Worker Hours]
Pasco % of Actuarial Group 4 Worker Hours is 5.08%.
Automobile Liability 455 1923 No
Errors & Omissions 136 97 Yes
General Liability 2391 45121 No
Personnel 53 63 Yes
Public Safety 473 4624 Yes
TOTALS:3508 125178 No
Automobile Liability $3,713,398 $317,905$188,471 Yes
Errors & Omissions $1,253,730 $128,866$63,632 Yes
General Liability $25,983,964 $128,819$1,318,796 No
Personnel $5,848,943 $957,604$296,859 Yes
Public Safety $23,577,180 $1,754,505$1,196,642 Yes
TOTALS:$60,377,215 $3,287,699$3,064,400 Yes
Page 3Page 9 of 31
Expected vs. Actual by Department | City of Pasco
Department
Actuarial Group 4
Claims Count
1/1/2013-12/31/2017
Pasco 1/1/2013-12/31/2017
Expected Claim
Count
Actual Claim
Count
Exceeds
Expected
Actuarial Group 4
Total Incurred
1/1/2013-12/31/2017
Pasco 1/1/2013-12/31/2017
Expected Total
Incurred
Actual Total
Incurred
Exceeds
Expected
Expected Claim Count = [Actuarial Group Claim Count] X [% of Member Worker Hours]Expected Total Incurred = [Actuarial Group Total Incurred] X [% of Member Worker Hours]
Pasco % of Actuarial Group 4 Worker Hours is 5.08%.
ADMINISTRATION 45 42 Yes $2,930,814 $45,875$148,751 No
ANIMAL CONTROL 8 10 Yes $68,152 $0$3,459 No
CITY LIGHT 40 02 No $62,283 $0$3,161 No
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 63 33 No $925,752 $69,424$46,986 Yes
DISPATCH 0 00 No $0 $0$0 No
FIRE MEDIC 17 41 Yes $24,142 $7,069$1,225 Yes
FIRE SUPPRESSION 29 01 No $63,127 $0$3,204 No
GENERAL 1 00 No $5,000 $0$254 No
LIBRARY 10 01 No $59,260 $0$3,008 No
MARINA 4 00 No $0 $0$0 No
PARKS MAINTENANCE 169 49 No $979,407 $0$49,709 No
PARKS REC PROGRAMS 51 23 No $947,374 $0$48,083 No
POLICE 670 5534 Yes $27,551,677 $2,994,301$1,398,364 Yes
PW ENGINEER 259 2213 Yes $6,991,828 $66,444$354,865 No
PW REFUSE 129 07 No $634,313 $0$32,194 No
PW SEWER 572 629 No $3,901,769 $19,766$198,031 No
PW STREETS 1101 2256 No $12,785,578 $45,626$648,922 No
PW WATER 332 117 No $2,385,659 $35,000$121,082 No
SENIOR CENTER 3 00 No $55,436 $0$2,814 No
TOTALS:3503 124178 No $60,371,571 $3,283,505$3,064,112 Yes
Page 4Page 10 of 31
Claim Frequency and Severity | City of Pasco
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Automobile Liability Errors & Omissions General Liability Personnel Public Safety
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Automobile Liability Errors & Omissions General Liability Personnel Public Safety
Page 5Page 11 of 31
Claim Frequency and Severity - Five Year | City of Pasco
Each Occurrence Capped at $100k *Please note that Expected Losses are an Estimate only for this time period.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2009 -
2
0
1
3
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
o
f
1
2
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
3
2010 -
2
0
1
4
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
o
f
1
2
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
4
2011 -
2
0
1
5
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
o
f
1
2
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
5
2012 -
2
0
1
6
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
o
f
1
2
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
6
2013 -
2
0
1
7
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
o
f
1
2
/
3
1
/
2
0
1
7
*
Actual Expected
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
2009 -
2
0
1
3
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
of
1
2/
3
1/
2
0
1
3
2010 -
2
0
1
4
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
of
1
2/
3
1/
2
0
1
4
2011 -
2
0
1
5
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
o
f
1
2/
3
1/
2
0
1
5
2012 -
2
0
1
6
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
of
1
2/
3
1/
2
0
1
6
2013 -
2
0
1
7
V
al
u
e
d
a
s
of
1
2/
3
1/
2
0
1
7
*
Actual Expected
Page 6Page 12 of 31
Claim Severity 2013-2017 | City of Pasco
10%
4%
4%
29%
53%
Auto Liab $317.9k
E & O $128.87k
Gen Liab $128.82k
Personnel $957.6k
Pub Safety $1.75m
City of Pasco
6%2%
43%
10%
39%
Auto Liab $3.71m
E & O $1.25m
Gen Liab $25.98m
Personnel $5.85m
Pub Safety $23.58m
Actuarial Group 4
7%
4%
46%
10%
33%Auto Liab $6.36m
E & O $3.56m
Gen Liab $43.36m
Personnel $9.14m
Pub Safety $30.39m
WCIA
Page 7Page 13 of 31
Top Losses by Frequency and Severity 2013-2017 | City of Pasco
By Frequency By Severity
Total of Top Losses:$3,100,512
Grand Total All Losses:$3,283,505
% Of Grand Total:94%
Total of Top Losses:66
Grand Total All Losses:124
% Of Grand Total:53%
PS Impound 13
PS Care/Custody/Control 12
Street-Defect/Pothole 7
AL Backing 6
AL Stationary Object 5
OP Construction 5
Premise Defect 5
PS Excessive Force 5
PS Negligent Supervision/Training 4
Sidewalk-Defect 4
PS Excessive Force $1,530,843
EP Retaliation $950,487
AL Failure to Yield $240,926
PS Care/Custody/Control $139,666
LU Due Process $50,100
Sidewalk-Defect $44,500
E&O Other $40,425
AL Emergency Response $35,908
Water Main Break $35,000
AL Backing $32,657
Page 8Page 14 of 31
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 19, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/25/18
FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing Sale of City Property; Disposal Options
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Resolution
Sale Alternatives - 1 Lot, 2 Lots
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Council conducted a public hearing on the possible disposal of real property, surplus to
the needs of the City's Water Utility, on June 4.
The attached, proposed Resolution provides a template for Council to authorize the
disposal of the property. Depending on the alternative that Council selects for both: 1)
Number of parcels and, 2) Disposal method, the Resolution can be completed for final
approval.
The Dradie property has 200 front feet of property with approximately 300 feet of
depth (60,000 sq. ft. +/-). The minimum lot size in the neighborhood (RS -20 zone) is
90 feet frontage with a minimum lot size of 20,000 sq. ft. It is therefore, possible to
split the lot in two parcels, each in conformance with zoning requirements (See both 1
and 2 lot alternatives, attached). The costs to prepare the necessary short plat for the 2
lot alternative would be minimal (survey and filing) yet, the return to the City could be
an estimated additional 60 percent in sale price.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 15 of 31
As the property is residential and not located in a highly visible area, staff recommends
retaining a real estate professional to assist in marketing the property. As this is an
exception to methods currently outlined in the PMC for property disposal, staff
proposes to include the specific authorization in the Resolution. If Council prefers a
more traditional approach, negotiated sale or sealed bid, this language can be deleted.
Page 16 of 31
Item: Lot Size Comparison Map - Riverhill Lot 1Applicant: City of Pasco WAFile #: EXEC 2017-021 Exhibit#1SITELegendUnder .5 Acres.5 to 1.0 Acres1.0 to 1.25 Acres1.25 to 1.5 AcresOver 1.5 AcresPage 17 of 31
Item: Lot Size Comparison Map - Riverhill Lot 1Applicant: City of Pasco WAFile #: EXEC 2017-021 Exhibit#1SITELegendUnder .5 Acres.5 to 1.0 Acres1.0 to 1.25 Acres1.25 to 1.5 AcresOver 1.5 AcresPage 18 of 31
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City of Pasco, Washington, approving the sale
of certain real property on Dradie Street.
WHEREAS, the City owns approximately 1.4 acres of real property on Dradie Street;
and
WHEREAS, the property was originally acquired in connection with the City’s culinary
water utility; and
WHEREAS, following a public hearing before the City Council on June 4, 2018,
pursuant to RCW 35.94.040, the Council has determined that the property is not necessary for
anticipated future use of the City and its disposal will best serve the public’s interest; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined to offer the property for sale as (one or two)
residential building lot(s); and
WHEREAS, the City has determined to list the property with a real estate professional in
order to provide widespread notice of the availability of the property and to assist the City in
other matters related thereto; and
WHEREAS, the proposed use of the property is consistent with zoning in the vicinity.
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That preparation for the sale of that certain real property consisting of 1.4
acres on Dradie Street, as (one or two) residential building lots is hereby authorized.
Section 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to undertake all actions
deemed advisable, including the retention of a real estate professional, to prepare, appraise,
market and complete all documents necessary to effect the sale of the property, subject to final
approval of the City Council and in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution and
applicable policy and law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular meeting this _____ day of
July, 2018.
Matt Watkins, Mayor
ATTEST:
Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Page 19 of 31
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 6, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Steve M. Worley, Public Works Director
Workshop Meeting: 6/25/18
FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer
Public Works
SUBJECT: Complete Streets Policy Ordinance
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Ordinance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion Only
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On September 6, 2016, City Council approved Resolution No. 3725 adopting a
Complete Streets Policy within the City of Pasco.
Complete Streets
"Complete Streets" is a concept that promotes streets that are safe and convenient for
all users including motor vehicle drivers and passengers, pedestrians, bicyclists, transit
riders, etc. and provides accommodation for all such transportation uses.
Three important ideas of Complete Streets are:
- Protect vulnerable users.
- Provide mobility options.
- Create healthy, livable communities.
The City's Complete Streets policy confirms the commitments the City has already
made to safety for all road users through our Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. The
policy applies to all transportation projects wit hin City right-of-way, both local and
Page 20 of 31
arterial.
Funding Opportunity
The Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) Complete Streets Program is a new
funding opportunity for local governments. The state legislature provided funding in
2015 and the first awards were given in January of 2017. Awards ranged between
$125,000 and $500,000.
The TIB has developed this new funding source to be different from its other grant
programs both in selection and disbursement. The selection process requires the City
to solicit nominations rather than applying directly. Awarded money is disbursed at
once rather than a reimbursement basis. The Complete Streets Award is granted based
on a program rather than a specific project proposal. Only cities within Washington
state who have an adopted complete streets ordinance are eligible.
The next awards are tentatively scheduled for an open call in July 2018 and awards in
early 2019. Nominations by nominating organizations will be due to TIB by December
14th, 2018. Nominating organizations will set their own deadlines for local agencies to
be considered.
V. DISCUSSION:
This ordinance sets forth the Complete Streets Policy for City of Pasco, thereby
confirming Pasco's commitment to the safety of our citizens and making Pasco eligible
for upcoming grant funding.
Page 21 of 31
Ordinance Creating 12.35
“Complete Streets Policy” - 1
ORDINANCE NO.__________
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington
adopting Pasco’s Complete Streets Program creating Chapter
12.35 “Complete Streets Policy” to the Pasco Municipal Code
WHEREAS, in 2016, the Pasco City Council approved Resolution No. 3275, adopting a
Complete Streets Policy within the City of Pasco; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is committed to the safety and health of its residents and
visitors; and
WHEREAS, the “Complete Streets” concept promotes streets that are safe and
convenient for all users of the City ways; and
WHEREAS, promoting pedestrian, bicycle and transit travel as an alternative to
automobiles reduces negative environmental impacts, promotes healthy living and is less costly
to the commuter; and
WHEREAS, the development of a more complete transportation network or “Complete
Streets” can improve pedestrian safety, increase the transportation network’s capacity, and
promote improvements in public health; and
WHEREAS, studies have found that providing more travel options, including public
transportation, bicycling and walking facilities, is an important element in reducing congestion;
and
WHEREAS, the Complete Streets Policy is consistent with the goals of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan - - Transportation Element; and
WHEREAS, transportation costs can be reduced when local infrastructure encourages
active transportation, which helps families replace car trips with bicycling, walking, or taking
public transit. When roads are redesigned and maintained to attract pedestrians, the local
economy improves and diversifies from increased buyers, which creates job growth and
increased investment in the area, including surrounding property values; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State legislature has passed Complete Streets legislation
that encourages the Washington State Department of Transportation and local governments to
consider all users in transportation-related projects and provided for funding a Complete Streets’
grant program which encourages street designs that safely meet the needs of all users and also
protects and preserves the community’s environment and character. NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Page 22 of 31
Ordinance Creating 12.35
“Complete Streets Policy” - 2
Section 1. That a new Chapter 12.35 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled
“Complete Streets Policy” shall be and hereby is adopted and shall read as follows:
Chapter 12.35
COMPLETE STREETS POLICY
Sections:
12.35.010 Purpose.
12.35.020 Definitions.
12.35.030 Implementation.
12.35.040 Exceptions.
12.35.050 Best Practice Criteria.
12.35.010 PURPOSE. The purpose of the “Complete Streets Policy” is to, the
maximum extent practical, consider all users of the right-of-way, including pedestrians,
bicyclists, motorists, emergency responders, freight carriers, and all public transportation users
in planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of all of the City’s transportation
improvement projects. The Complete Streets Policy is intended to increase the overall safety of
the community, as well as supporting the economy and desirability of the City as a place to live
and to conduct business. This policy affirms Pasco’s commitment to the safety and health of its
citizens.
12.35.020 DEFINITIONS.
A) “Complete Streets” means a roadway that is designed to be safe, accessible, and
functional for all users of the City’s rights-of-way regardless of age or ability, with the goals of:
1) Promoting healthy communities by encouraging walking, bicycling, and
using public transportation;
2) Improving safety by designing major arterials to include features such as
wider sidewalks, dedicated bicycle facilities, medians, and pedestrian streetscape
features, including trees where appropriate;
3) Protecting the environment and reducing congestion by providing safe
alternatives to single-occupancy driving; and
4) Preserving community character by involving local citizens and
stakeholders to participate in planning and design decisions.
B) “Complete Street Infrastructure” are design features that contribute to a safe,
convenient, or comfortable travel experience for users. These can include but are not limited to
features such as: sidewalks; shared use paths; bicycle lanes; automobile lanes; paved shoulders;
street trees and landscaping; planting strips; curbs; accessible curb ramps; crosswalks; refuge
Page 23 of 31
Ordinance Creating 12.35
“Complete Streets Policy” - 3
islands; pedestrian and traffic signals, including countdown and accessible signals; signage;
street furniture; bicycle parking facilities; traffic calming devices such as rotary circles, traffic
bumps, and surface treatments such as paving blocks, textured asphalt, and concrete; narrow
vehicle lanes; and raised medians.
C) “Street” means any public right-of-way, including arterials, connectors, alleys,
ways, lanes, and roadways by any other designation, as well as bridges, tunnels, and any other
portions of the transportation network, that is open for use by the general traveling public.
D) “Street Project” means the construction, reconstruction, retrofit, maintenance,
alteration or repair of any street. This includes planning, design, approval, and implementation
processes, except minor routine upkeep such as cleaning, sweeping, mowing, spot repair, or
interim measures.
E) “Users” means vehicles or individuals that use streets. This includes pedestrians,
cyclists, trucks, automobiles, emergency vehicles, transit vehicles and rides, and people of all
ages and abilities including children, youth, families, older adults, and people with disabilities.
15.35.030 IMPLEMENTATION.
A) All street projects including new construction, reconstruction, retrofit, and
rehabilitation shall include Complete Streets Infrastructure elements to the maximum extent
practicable to create an interconnected, integrated network of inclusive facilities.
B) The implementation of various Complete Streets elements will utilize the best
practices design criteria. The design of Complete Streets components to be implemented shall be
based upon a context sensitive approach recognizing that transportation needs vary, considering
the street’s existing conditions, the present as well as future needs of all right-of-way users,
consistent with sound engineering principles.
C) This policy will also be implemented through the development of various
transportation plans for the City. These plans include the Transportation System Master Plan,
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, and the Comprehensive Plan.
12.35.040 EXCEPTIONS. Complete Streets implementation shall not be required
when:
A) A documented absence of current or future need exists.
B) Non-motorized uses are prohibited by law.
C) The cost of accommodation is excessively disproportionate to the need or
probable use, or is more than twenty percent (20%) of the project cost.
Page 24 of 31
Ordinance Creating 12.35
“Complete Streets Policy” - 4
D) The accommodation is not physically feasible (i.e. project currently slated for or
in construction or areas where there is not sufficient available space to construct the
accommodation).
E) When in the discretion of the Public Works Director has determined that
application of the Complete Streets principles are unnecessary or inappropriate due to:
1) Application would be contrary to public safety.
2) Result in significant adverse environmental impacts.
3) Be contrary to the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, the
Transportation System Master Plan, or the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.
4) Where their inclusion creates a small, isolated project consisting of a short
section of improvements which are unlikely to be extended in a timely manner, therefore,
not furthering the purpose of the Complete Streets networks.
5) Other projects that implementation would be adverse to the City’s best
interest.
12.35.050 BEST PRACTICE CRITERIA. The Public Works Director shall modify,
develop, and adopt policies, design criteria, standards and guidelines based upon recognized best
practices in street design, construction and operations including, but not limited to, the latest
editions of American Association of State Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE), and National Association of City Transportation Officials
(NACTO) guidelines and standards, while reflecting the context and character of the surrounding
built and natural environment and enhancing the appearance of such.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five days after its approval,
passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as
provided by law this ____ day of _________________, 2018.
_____________________________
Matt Watkins, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________ ____________________________________
Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Page 25 of 31
City of Pasco
Complete Streets
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is Complete Streets?
Complete Streets:
- Is a high-level policy direction
- Changes the everyday decision-making processes and systems
- Represents an incremental approach
Complete Streets is NOT:
- One “special” street project
- A design prescription
- A mandate for immediate retrofit
- A silver bullet: other issues must be addressed
o Land use (proximity, mixed-use)
o Environmental concerns
o Transportation Demand Management
Don’t we already do that?
Essentially, yes. When a project is designed, transportation of all kinds is considered. This policy
formalizes a thoughtful design process that includes all users.
How much will it cost? Is there a fee or are my taxes being increased?
Costs vary, but it’ll be included in our transportation and capital improvement projects, based on
comprehensive plan guidance. This is not a proposal to charge a fee or increase taxes.
Do I have to build a sidewalk? How will this affect my mailbox?
This is not a policy that requires everyone to build a sidewalk in front of their existing home. When
appropriate, however, sidewalks will continue to be required of new development and included in city
projects. If a new development or city project is planned, mailbox location will be addressed as part of
the project.
How does this affect development standards?
City of Pasco already requires frontage improvements that address expected transportation (both
motorized and non-motorized). Developments must continue to consider transportation network as a
portion of the project.
Where does the policy apply?
This policy applies within the City of Pasco. Installation or construction of complete streets elements will
be context sensitive and site specific, taking existing features and neighborhood character into account.
What is the benefit of having such a policy?
Having the complete streets policy affirms Pasco’s commitment to providing the opportunity for all
residents to get around safely and efficiently whether they own a vehicle or not.
Page 26 of 31
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council June 6, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 6/25/18
FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: Draft Council Goals for 2018-2019
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Goals 2018-2019
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion; Provide Direction to Staff
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Council met in retreat to consider goals for the 2018-2019 biennium on May 18 and 19.
Based on the information received from public meetings, a citizen survey, partner
agencies and senior staff reports, Council provided ranking and guidance for
developing the goals for the next two years.
The attached draft, provided in redline version (comparing the 2016-2017 goals), plus a
clean draft are offered for Council discussion and direction.
V. DISCUSSION:
When Council has consensus on the format and wording, staff will prepare a resolution
for formal adoption.
Page 27 of 31
DRAFT COUNCIL GOALS
2018-2019
QUALITY OF LIFE. Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re-
investment in community infrastructure by:
Use of CDBG and other public and private capital to re-revitalize older neighborhoods.
Continued efforts to designate/acquire Acquisition of an adequate site for new community center and, community park.
Continued efforts to provide and additional soccer fields.
Coordination with the Pasco Public Facilities District on investigation of the feasibility of constructing/maintaining an
aquatic/community recreation facility.
Maintaining coordination with the Regional Public Facilities District on a possible “grand bargain” approach to regional
public facilities.
Commencement of mpletion of site designation process and interlocal agreements on construction and operation of new
animal control facility.
Ongoing efforts to improve Eefficiencyt and effectiveness in the use of public resources in the delivery of municipal
services, programs and long-term maintenance and viability of public facilities
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY. Enhance evaluate the long-term financial viability, value and service levels of services and
programs, including:
Importance to community
Continuation of cost of service/recovery targets in evaluating City services.
Ongoing Eevaluation of costs associated with delivery including staffing, facilities and partnership opportunities.
COMMUNITY SAFETY. Preserve past improvements and promote future gains by:
Enhancing proactive community policing efforts.
Continued efforts to improve police/community relations.
Working to achieve/maintain/achieve target fire response times through operational improvements and long-range planning
of facilities and staffing.
Focus on a long-term goal of improving the Washington State Ratings Bureau community rating to Class 4 .
Efforts to realize full implementation of a consolidated PSAP/dispatch center
Review of the inventories of City sidewalks and streetlight systems and consideration of policies/methods to address needs.
COMMUNITY MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. Promote a highly-functional transportation network
through:
Completion of the Lewis Street Overpass design concept process, securing gap funding for construction and achievement
and maintenance of “shovel-ready” status.
Continued emphasis on improvements inCompletion of Road 68/I-182/Burden Blvd. corridor. Interchange improvements
Efforts to facilitate traffic flow in major corridors .
Pro-active traffic management (calming) within neighborhoods.
Completion of planned improvements on Oregon Avenue.
Continued Ccollaboration with Ben-Franklin Transit to enhance mobility.
Undertaking a Ccomprehensive and inclusive transportation planning and, analysis process to include facilitation of traffic
flow in major corridors,and supportexecution on integration of pedestrian, bicycle and other non-vehicular means of
transportation.
ECONOMIC VITALITY. Promote and encourage economic vitality by supporting:
Downtown revitalization efforts of DPDA.
Implementation of downtown infrastructure improvements including; Peanuts Park, Farmers Market, Pasco Specialty
Kitchen and streetscape/gateway upgrades.
Comprehensive Plan updates to include growth management strategies, review of City utility extension policies and
development standards, infill and consideration of affordable housing needs.
Completion of the Broadmoor sub-area plan and environmental analysis, including plans for needed utilit ies and
transportation improvements.
Formatted: Not Small caps, Shadow
Page 28 of 31
Increased Eefforts to promote the community as a desirable place for commercial and industrial development – including
small business outreach and assistance and predictability in project review.strengthening existing partnerships and
coordinating efforts
Continuation of DNR efforts to encourage DNR to sell/develop remaining state property at Road 68/I-182.
Identification of alternatives for City/Port of Pasco and other regional partners for coordination on waterfront plan
implementation and similar projects.
COMMUNITY IDENTITY. Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion and image through:
Community surveying
Providing opportunities for community engagement through boards, commissions, volunteer opportunities, social media,
forums and other outlets
Coordinated messaging
Identification and celebration of successes
Implementation of a community identity/image enhancement campaign
Page 29 of 31
COUNCIL GOALS
2018-2019
QUALITY OF LIFE. Promote a high-quality of life through quality programs, services and appropriate investment and re-
investment in community infrastructure by:
Use of CDBG and other public and private capital to re-revitalize older neighborhoods.
Continued efforts to designate/acquire adequate site for new community center and community park.
Continued efforts to provide additional soccer fields.
Coordination with the Pasco Public Facilities District on investigation of the feasibility of constructing/maintaining an
aquatic/community recreation facility.
Maintaining coordination with the Regional Public Facilities District on a possible “grand bargain” approach to regional
public facilities.
Commencement of construction and operation of new animal control facility.
Ongoing efforts to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the use of public resources in the delivery of municipal services,
programs and long-term maintenance and viability of public facilities
FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY. Enhance the long-term financial viability, value and service levels of services and programs,
including:
Importance to community
Continuation of cost of service/recovery targets in evaluating City services.
Ongoing evaluation of costs associated with delivery including staffing, facilities and partnership opportunities.
COMMUNITY SAFETY. Preserve past improvements and promote future gains by:
Enhancing proactive community policing efforts.
Continued efforts to improve police/community relations.
Working to achieve/maintain target fire response times through operational improvements and long-range planning of
facilities and staffing.
Focus on a long-term goal of improving the Washington State Ratings Bureau community rating to Class 4 .
Review of the inventories of City sidewalks and streetlight systems and consideration of policies/methods to address needs.
COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. Promote a highly-functional transportation network through:
Completion of the Lewis Street Overpass design concept process, securing gap funding for construction and achievement
of “shovel-ready” status.
Continued emphasis on improvements in Road 68/I-182/Burden Blvd. corridor.
Pro-active traffic management (calming) within neighborhoods.
Continued collaboration with Ben-Franklin Transit to enhance mobility.
Undertaking a comprehensive and inclusive transportation planning and analysis process to include facilitation of traffic
flow in major corridors, support integration of pedestrian, bicycle and other non-vehicular means of transportation.
ECONOMIC VITALITY. Promote and encourage economic vitality by supporting:
Downtown revitalization efforts of DPDA.
Implementation of downtown infrastructure improvements including; Peanuts Park, Farmers Market, and
streetscape/gateway upgrades.
Comprehensive Plan updates to include growth management strategies, review of City utility extension policies and
development standards, infill and consideration of affordable housing needs.
Completion of the Broadmoor sub-area plan and environmental analysis, including plans for needed utilities and
transportation improvements.
Increased efforts to promote the community as a desirable place for commercial and industrial development – including
small business outreach and assistance and predictability in project review.
Continuation of efforts to encourage DNR to sell/develop remaining state property at Road 68/I-182.
Identification of alternatives for City/Port of Pasco and other regional partners for coordination on waterfront plan
implementation and similar projects.
Page 30 of 31
COMMUNITY IDENTITY. Identify opportunities to enhance community identity, cohesion and image through:
Community surveying
Providing opportunities for community engagement through boards, commissions, volunteer opportunities, social media,
forums and other outlets
Coordinated messaging
Identification and celebration of successes
Implementation of a community identity/image enhancement campaign
Page 31 of 31