Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018.05.14 Council Workshop PacketWorkshop Meeting AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. May 14, 2018 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 3 - 21 (a) 15005 - Comprehensive Water System Plan Update 22 - 23 (b) Establishment of Pasco-Colima Sister City Relationship 24 - 53 (c) Community Risk Reduction Program 54 - 57 (d) Professional Service Agreement with Meier Architecture Engineering for the Animal Control Facility 58 - 84 (e) PSD 2018 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report 85 - 94 (f) Use of Personal Fireworks 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: (a) Inclusivity Commission Update Presented by Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 7. ADJOURNMENT. REMINDERS: 1. 11:45 a.m., Monday, May 14, Pasco Red Lion – Pasco Chamber of Commerce Membership Luncheon. (“The Practice of Law” presented by Alex Ekstrom, Page 1 of 94 Workshop Meeting May 14, 2018 Benton Franklin Superior Court Judge and Brian Davis, Attorney/Partner at Leavy Schultz Davis) 2. 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 16, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd – Tri-Cities Legislative Council’s Legislative Reception. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, COUNCILMEMBERS BLANCHE BARAJAS, CRAIG MALONEY, SAUL MARTINEZ and PETE SERRANO) 3. 12:30 p.m., Thursday, May 17, Tri-Cities Community Health, 800 W. Court St. – Greater Columbia ACH Leadership Council and Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER RUBEN ALVARADO, Rep.; DAVID MILNE, Alt.) 4. 11:30 a.m., Friday, May 18, El Chapala, 107 E. Columbia Drive – Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BLANCHE BARAJAS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER RUBEN ALVARADO, Alt.) 5. 5:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m., Friday, May 18, Pasco Red Lion – Council Retreat. (Councilmember dinner 5:00-6:30 p.m.; no City business to be discussed or conducted.) 6. 7:30 a.m. – 4:00 p.m., Saturday, May 19, Pasco Red Lion – Council Retreat. (Councilmember breakfast 7:30-8:30 a.m.; no City business to be discussed or conducted.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 2 of 94 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 8, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Steve Worley, Public Works Director Workshop Meeting: 5/14/18 FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: 15005 - Comprehensive Water System Plan Update I. REFERENCE(S): Comprehensive Water System Plan Update Presentation Comprehensive Water System Plan Executive Summary II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presentation Only III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City has completed a draft update to the Comprehensive Water System Plan (CWSP) in accordance with Washington State Department of Health (DOH) guidelines and in compliance with WAC 246-290-100. MurraySmith & Associates, Inc. (MSA) developed the CWSP update in coordination with City staff. This CWSP provides a comprehensive update to the City’s last CWSP developed in 2009 and amended in 2010. The draft Plan has been submitted for review to DOH and initial comments received have been addressed. The CWSP will be submitted to DOH for final review and approval after Council review and comments. Once the plan is approved by DOH, it will be presented to Council for adoption. Page 3 of 94 In conjunction with this Plan update the City's existing Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program must be updated through a public forum process, per WAC 246-290-830. A Public Hearing to discuss WUE goals will be scheduled for June 4, 2018. V. DISCUSSION: This CWSP presents the methodology and key findings for each evaluation required to understand capacity of the existing system, the projected demands for the established planning horizons, and the performance criteria that describe the need for new infrastructure or improvements. The CWSP includes the following elements: Population and Demand Projection, System Analysis, Water Use Efficiency, Operations and Maintenance, Capital Improvements Plan and Financial Analysis. Standard planning horizons defined by DOH for projected demand and system analysis are 6-year and 20-year periods. The document includes also a 10-year period, in accordance with the approval cycle established for this Plan. The Water System Improvement Plan (also referred as Capital Improvement Plan or CIP in DOH guidelines) is a 10-year plan and addresses additional supply capacity, new storage tanks and pipe improvements. This 10-year list of improvements includes 29 projects and 8 studies, with an estimated total implementation cost of $48 million. The updated plan, as adopted, will be incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan Update. MSA will provide a presentation on their findings. Page 4 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-1 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 Introduction Located along the north shore of the Columbia River in Franklin County, the City of Pasco (City) is the major service center for the expanding agricultural industrial region of the Columbia Basin. This Comprehensive Water System Plan (CWSP) identifies the need for capital investment and summarizes those investments. The recommendations contained within this CWSP were developed to identify and address deficiencies within the supply, pumping, reservoir, and piping systems, with the ultimate goal of compliance with Washington Department of Health’s (WDOH) regulations. At the time of development of this CWSP, the City’s population (2014) is 66,577, however the City Utility currently provides water service to about 70,770 people, which includes areas outside the City limits within Franklin County. ES.1.1 How This Plan Should Be Used This CWSP guides future system improvements, and should: · Be reviewed annually to prioritize and budget improvement projects. · Be updated every 10 years to address current conditions as required by WDOH. · Have the system mapping and hydraulic model updated regularly to reflect ongoing development and construction. · Have its specific project recommendations regarded as conceptual. The location, size, and timing of projects may change as additional site-specific details and potential alternatives are investigated and analyzed in the preliminary engineering phase of project design. · Have its cost estimates updated and refined with preliminary engineering and final project designs. ES.1.2 Purpose This CWSP provides a comprehensive update to the City’s last CWSP developed in 2009 and amended in 2010. The planning period for this CWSP is 2022, 2027, and 2036. This CWSP presents the sources of information, methodology and key findings for each evaluation required to understand the hydraulics in the existing system, the expected growth, the projected demands in each planning horizon, and the performance criteria that dictate whether new infrastructure is required. The proposed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is based on a number of technical evaluations with valuable input from the City’s staff. This document describes and provides justification for each project in the CIP, including cost opinions and implementation timeframe. The Page 5 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-2 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan CWSP does not include an analysis of the City’s water treatment plants (WTP), however it does provide the quantity and timing of supply required from those sources and a recommendation to complete a facility plan for the Butterfield WTP. The information presented in this CWSP and overall planning effort is subject to the quality of data available at this time. ES.1.3 Scope of Work The City selected Murraysmith, Inc. (Murraysmith) to update the 2009 Comprehensive Water System Plan. The CWSP is meant to act as a working document and tool for justifying improvements to the water system, while demonstrating the system’s ability to meet WDOH requirements. The scope of work for this CWSP included the following major tasks: • Evaluate the system performance under existing, 2022, 2027, and 2036 planning horizon conditions. • Projections of annual average and peak water supply demands. • Identification of existing and future water supply capacity. • Development of a system-wide and comprehensive steady state water system model. • Assessment of current and future drinking water quality regulations. • Identification of current and projected deficiencies related to water supply, pumping, piping, and storage. • Identify areas of deficient flow or pressure in the system through the 20-year planning period. • Evaluation of fire flow availability under current and future conditions. • Identification of discrete system improvements to correct current and anticipated deficiencies. • Development of a comprehensive listing of proposed improvements. • Summary of the financial program. • Overview of the operations and maintenance program. ES.1.4 Organization of the CWSP This CWSP is organized into nine sections with an executive summary, as described in Table ES-1. Detailed technical information and support documents are included in the appendices. Page 6 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-3 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan Table ES-1 CWSP Organization Sections Description Executive Summary Purpose and scope of the CWSP and summary of key components of each part of the plan. 1 – Water System Descriptions Water system background with overview of the existing system, facilities, and other studies. 2 – Water Service Area and Planning Information Description of the service area and service area agreements, and policies. 3 – Population and Water Demand Population, customer, and water use projections to determine existing and future demands for each pressure zone. 4 – Water Supply Summary Description of existing supply capacity, water rights, and water quality. 5 – Hydraulic Criteria Overview of system performance criteria. 6 – Water Distribution System Analysis Discussion of approach to identify existing and future deficiencies and improvements. 7 – Capital Improvement Program Improvement recommendations including cost opinions and timeframe for implementation. 8 – Financial Plan Discussion of current and planned annual budgets, including summary of the 2015 water rate study to fund future capital projects. 9 – Operations and Maintenance Program Describes current operations and maintenance procedures, summary of recommendations. ES.2 Existing Water System In 2017, the City’s water system inventory consisted of approximately 330 miles of piping, 6 booster stations, 3 reservoirs, 2 water treatment plants, and 20 pressure reducing valve (PRV) stations. Figure ES-1 shows the existing system map. Service is presently provided to customers at a minimum elevation of 340 feet to a maximum elevation of 525 feet. The water system is divided into 3 large pressure zones to serve the range in service area elevations. The existing sources of supply are summarized in Table ES-2. Table ES-2 Summary of Sources of Supply Source Maximum Supply Capacity (mgd) Comments Butterfield WTP 26.8 The “reliable” capacity of 30 mgd is limited from by contact time, which is a result of services on the transmission main. West Pasco WTP 6.0 Initial design capacity of 6 mgd – with ability to expand to 18 mgd. Total Supply Capacity 32.8 mgd Note: mgd – million gallons a day Page 7 of 94 çPTWçPTWUTUTUT[Ú[Ú[Ú[Ú"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"b"bZone 2Zone 1Zone 3Zone 2-CZone 2-BZone 2-AZone 1-ACOLUMBIA R.Rd 36HorizonAintreeSaratogaHillsboroChapelhillBurns/DentThistledownRd 84/ArgentRd 84/MolineRd 44/DesertMadison/CookAdobe-BurdenDesert/PlateauMariola/ArtesiaBelmont/SaratogaRd 100/ChapelhillChapelhill/StJohnFoster Wells/CapitolSANDIFUR PKWYWest Pasco WTPButterfield WTPRd 36 PSBroadmoor PSEast Side PSRiverview Hights PSRd 68 TankBroadmoor TankRiverview Hights TankLegend"bPRV[ÚPump StationUTStorage TankçPTWWater Treatment PlantUrban Growth AreaParcelRiverPipeDiameter6 inch and smaller8 inch10 and 12 inchLarger than 12 inchPressure ZoneZone 1Zone 1-AZone 2Zone 2-AZone 2-BZone 2-CZone 3Comprehensive Water System Plan UpdateCity of Pasco©Figure ES-1Existing System andPressure Zones15-1710May 20180 4,0002,000 Feet Page 8 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-5 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan ES.2.1 Irrigation System The City also owns and operates a non-potable water utility that provides irrigation water to residential customers and a limited number of commercial customers in the northwest part of the City. The irrigation system serves approximately 6,890 residential accounts and 39 commercial and public facility accounts. Providing a system for irrigation water separate from the drinking water utility allows the City’s customers to avoid using treated drinking water to irrigate. Where non-potable irrigation is available per customer potable water use is much lower on average as discussed in Section 3 - Population and Water Demand. ES.3 Water Service Area and Planning Information The City’s existing water service area is described in detail in Section 2 - Water Service Area and Planning Information. The current water system service area is approximately 19,160 acres. This includes acreage within the City limits and some unincorporated areas within Franklin County. The planning service area corresponds to the City’s 20-Year UGB (Urban Growth Boundary). The UGB was developed by the City through its Community Development Department, Planning Commission, and City Council with benefit of both citizen input and review, and has been approved by Franklin County. The planning service area is approximately 25,600 acres and is presented in Figure ES-2. Page 9 of 94 COLUMBIA R.SANDIFUR PKWYCHAPEL HILL BLVDOLIVER DRLegendExisting Service AreaPlanning Service Area*Urban Growth BoundaryCity LimitParcelRiverComprehensive Water System Plan UpdateCity of Pasco©Figure ES-2Planning Areas15-1710May 20180 4,0002,000 Feet*The Planning Service Area aligns with theCity's Service Area and intended place of use of water rights.Page 10 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-7 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan ES.4 Population and Water Demand The City’s water system service area goes beyond the existing City limits, including unincorporated areas within the UGB. The 2014 population for the existing water service area was approximately 70,770. At this time, the City’s water system serves approximately 82 percent of the Franklin County population. The projected population for the 2036 City Water Service Area is 112,200, representing an increase of 70 percent from 2014. Table ES-3 shows the annual water production and average and maximum water usage for 2008-2014; this information was used to develop demands for system analysis. Table ES-3 City of Pasco Total Annual Water Usage Year Total Raw Water Produced (MG) Total Net Water (MG) 1 Average Water Usage (mgd) 2 Maximum Water Usage (mgd) 3 Maximum/Average Water Usage Peaking Factor 2008 4,227 4,215 11.5 24.8 2.1 2009 4,437 4,432 12.1 30.1 2.5 2010 4,350 4,338 11.9 25.3 2.1 2011 4,372 4,314 11.8 23.7 2.0 2012 5,131 5,061 13.9 23.8 1.7 2013 4,471 4,268 11.7 19.8 1.7 2014 4,598 4,416 12.1 20.2 1.7 Notes: 1 Total Net Water is the Total Raw Water minus the WTPs filter backwash 2 Based on Total Net Water 3 Based on City’s Water Monthly Data reports ES.4.1 Water Use Efficiency Program The City is committed to ensuring its water resources are used efficiently to maintain the community’s high quality of life for generations to come. In keeping with this commitment, the City’s Water Use Efficiency (WUE) program includes incentives that encourage wise water use and utilizes technologies and processes associated with City activities to improve water savings. ES.4.2 Future Demands System-wide future consumption projections were estimated as a part of the 2016 Regional Water Forecast and Conservation Plan (RWFCP). Future demands in the RWFCP were estimated using current patterns of water use and projected population. Table ES-4 presents the average and maximum day projections developed from the RWFCP. Page 11 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-8 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan Table ES-4 Future Water Supply Projections Year Description City of Pasco Water Service Area 2014 Water Service Population 70,770 Total Supply (gallons) 4,597,500,000 Total Supply (gpm) 8,747 Supply per Capita (gallons/yr) 64,964 ERUs1 29,707 2022 Water Service Population 82,500 Total Supply (gallons) 5,359,527,342 Total Supply (gpm) 10,197 Supply per Capita (gallons/yr) 64,964 ERUs1 34,631 2027 Water Service Population 93,775 Total Supply (gallons) 6,091,996,079 Total Supply (gpm) 11,591 Supply per Capita (gallons/yr) 64,964 ERUs1 39,364 2036 Water Service Population 112,200 Total Supply (gallons) 7,288,957,185 Total Supply (gpm) 13,868 Supply per Capita (gallons/yr) 64,964 ERUs1 47,098 Notes: Source: Regional Water Forecast and Conservation Plan Report, January 2016 1 Based on an existing ERU = 424 gallons per day per residential family unit; gpdpd=gallons per dwelling per day The key findings of the water use analysis (discussed in Section 3 – Population and Water Demand) are: • In 2022, the City’s water distribution system must have adequate capacity to serve a maximum day demand of 31.0 mgd, with a peak hour demand of 39.3 mgd, for a growth of 16 percent when compared to current demands (2015). For this planning horizon, the expected additional industrial demand is 0.6 mgd. • In 2027, the City’s water distribution system must have adequate capacity to serve a maximum day demand of 35.8 mgd, with a peak hour demand of 45.3 mgd, for a growth of 33 percent when compared to current demands (2015). For this planning horizon, the expected additional industrial demand is 1.0 mgd. • In 2036, the City’s water distribution system must have adequate capacity to serve a maximum day demand of 41.9 mgd, with a peak hour demand of 53.4 mgd, for a growth of 56 percent when compared to current demands (2015). For this planning horizon, the expected additional industrial demand is 3.1 mgd. Page 12 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-9 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan • Per-capita water usage and other indicators of water use in the system were evaluated on a system-wide level and do not include impacts from the separate irrigation system water use. Water usage developed is conservative since there is the potential that future potable demands may be lower. As recommended in ES.6 Capital Improvement Program a water demand study would help to improve future projections. ES.4.3 Water Rights Section 4 – Water Supply Summary presents the water rights evaluation for City of Pasco. The City currently holds surface water rights for 14,450.65 acre-ft of annual withdrawal and 23,649 gpm (34 mgd) of instantaneous withdrawal. The source for these rights is the Columbia River which are to be used for domestic potable purposes. The City also holds individual groundwater rights sourced by various wells for separate irrigation purposes. Water rights held by the City are anticipated to increase in the future pending the following: • Pending water rights transactions. • The outcome of applications for new water rights made to Ecology in 2011 and 2015. • Additional water rights available through subsequent distributions of water available under the regional Quad City Water Right (QCWR) permit. The QCWR permit identifies a total allocation of 178 cubic feet per second (cfs) (79,892 gpm) and 96,619 acre-feet, to be distributed amongst the Quad Cities (Pasco, Kennewick, Richland, and West Richland) in phases. • Additional future water rights acquisitions. ES.4.4 Water Quality and Protection The City’s complies with all drinking water regulations and has no water quality issues or violations. Both English and Spanish versions of the current Consumer Confidence Report which provides information on the water quality, are available on the City’s website. Section 4 – Water Supply Summary also presents the City of Pasco’s Watershed Control Program. ES.5 Water Distribution System Analysis The adequacy of the system’s various components was evaluated by comparing the existing capacity with the requirements dictated by the hydraulic criteria, for current and future demand conditions (2022 and 2036 planning horizons). The evaluation is subject to the low quality of data that is available at this time. Recommendations for the improvement data are defined in ES.6 Capital Improvement Program. The criteria are described in Section 5 – Design and Construction Standards. The hydraulic model was used to assess the system’s ability to convey flows under maximum day, peak hour, and fire flow conditions while maintaining minimum residual pressures. Additionally, supply, storage, and pumping capacity evaluations were performed to identify Page 13 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-10 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan the adequacy of those respective system components. The methodology and results of the system analysis are presented in Section 6 – Water Distribution System Analysis. Here are the main conclusions of the system analysis: • The results show that in general, the system has adequate capacity to provide for existing demands and to accommodate the 2022, 2027, and 2035 planning horizons. • The supply capacity evaluation shows that the system has enough “reliable” capacity as defined in Section 4 – Water Supply Summary to serve 2022 needs. The planned expansion of the West Pasco WTP will provide the additional supply (3.2 mgd and 9.0 mgd) that will be required by 2027 and 2036 respectively. • The storage capacity evaluation shows existing deficiencies in Zones 2 and 3 (combined deficiency of 5.8 MG). These deficiencies increase to 6.70 MG for 2022, 7.97 for 2027 and 9.05 MG for 2036. • The hydraulic analysis confirms the existing network is able to deliver water to meet peak hourly demand at the required pressure to customers, under existing and future conditions. • Fire flow availability was adequate in most of the system, with the exception of four locations under existing conditions and one location under future conditions. The associated improvement for these locations will be the upgrade or installation of short segments of pipe (less than 1,000 feet each). • The transmission system is adequate to serve existing and future needs, with only one deficiency on the 20-inch transmission line from West Pasco WTP to Broadmoor Pump Station during 2036 PHD conditions. • The City has partially developed infill areas with inadequate fire coverage and/or domestic water service area that have been identified. Specific improvements have not been defined at this time. As future infill development occurs the City will evaluate to determine required improvements required to improve fire flow and service. ES.6 Capital Improvement Program The results of these evaluations were used to develop improvement concepts for each deficient area. Once improvement strategies were defined, conceptual alignment/location, size, cost opinion and timeframe were determined for each project. This information is presented in Section 7 – Capital Improvement Program. Page 14 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-11 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan The following process was used to develop the capital improvement projects: · Improvements were sized to serve demands through 2036. · Pipe improvements utilize standard 8-, 12-, 16-, 20-, 24-, 30- and 36-inch diameters. No improvements under 8 inches in diameter were recommended. · Costs related to expanding the water treatment plant were developed by other consultants and provided by the City for inclusion in the CIP. The CIP includes 31 projects, of these 28 capital projects and six studies are recommended within the next 10 years. Another three capital projects are recommended for the long-term (11-20 years). The total expected cost per project type and timeframe are summarized in Table ES-5. To serve the growth within the City’s planned future service area, concepts have been developed. The proposed future service area piping projects were developed with the intent of providing these areas with new pipes connecting to the existing system in different locations, creating loops to maintain redundancy and fire flow availability. Future service area projects are defined in Table ES-6, which provides an anticipated cost for expansion of the transmission system. The timing and funding of these projects is dependent on growth and development pressures with funding from the development community. Figure ES-3 presents the location of the proposed capital projects and the future service piping project concepts. The CWSP effort is an opportunity to improve and consolidate system information from different sources and to identify gaps or quality issues. Data quality or availability issues were identified throughout this CWSP; these include the following: · Limited pipe database with system connectivity as well as diameter, material, pressure zone, and age information. Development of water distribution pipe network geographical information system would allow the City to better management their water distribution system element information. · Characterization of the reduction in water demands for those customers that are served by separate irrigation coupled with spatial service meter demand information. Understanding of the location of use patterns will improve future demand projections and the results of future system evaluations. To aid the City in the development of the next CWSP, Table ES-7 summarizes the recommended data improvement studies and their cost. The cost ranges defined below are for planning purposes and will be further refined for each study as the City identifies the respective scopes of work. Page 15 of 94 çPTWçPTWUTUTUT[Ú[Ú[Ú[Ú[ÚUTUTçPTWçPTWçPTWCOLUMBIA R.West Pasco WTPButterfield WTPFP-028S-003S-002: Phase 2S-001: Phase 1DP-002T-001T-002SANDIFUR PKWYCHAPEL HILL BLVDRd 36 PSBroadmoor PSEast Side PSRiverview Hights PSRd 68 TankBroadmoor TankRiverview Hights TankLegendçPTWSupply ImprovementUTStorage Improvement[ÚPump Station ImprovementProposed Piping CIP (IP)Previously Defined Piping CIP (DP)Future Service Piping Projects (FP)[ÚPump StationUTStorage TankçPTWWater Treatment PlantParcelRiverPipe Diameter<=10 inch12-16 inch>16 inchPressure ZoneZone 1Zone 1-AZone 2Zone 2-AZone 2-BZone 2-CZone 3Comprehensive Water System Plan UpdateCity of Pasco©Figure ES-3Capital ImprovementProgram15-1710May 20180 3,000 FeetP-003AP-04AP-06AP-03AP-05Projects AP-08 and S-004 are not shown on this Figure. Page 16 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-13 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan Table ES-5 CIP Projects Project ID Type of Improvement Project Title Location Time Frame Cost AP-03 Supply CIP Butterfield Water Treatment Plant PLC and Control Upgrades Project #00039 Zone 1 2017-2018 $600,000 AP-04 Supply CIP Columbia Water Supply Project #11001 Zone 1 2017-2018 $8,705,000 AP-06 Supply CIP West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Backwash Ponds Project #16008 Zone 1 2017-2020 $2,226,000 S-005 Supply CIP Riverview Heights PS Backup Power Zone 1 2018 $380,000 S-004 Supply CIP ASR Feasibility Study System Wide 2019 $75,000 AP-05 Supply CIP Butterfield Water Treatment Plant Chlorine Safety Improvements City Project #17004 Zone 1 2019-2020 $325,000 S-003 Supply CIP Butterfield WTP Facility Plan Zone 1 2020 $300,000 S-001 Supply CIP West Pasco Water Treatment Plant Filter Expansion Phase 2 Zone 2 2024-2027 $1,350,001 S-002 Supply CIP West Pasco WTP Expansion - Phase 2 Zone 1 2035 $1,350,000 S-002- PS1 Supply CIP West Pasco WTP Expansion – Phase 2 – Pump Station Upgrade West Pasco WTP 2035 $910,000 T-001 Storage CIP New Storage Reservoir: 5.75 MG Project #00041 Zone 2 2020-2023 $11,700,000 T-002 Storage CIP New Storage Reservoir: 3.5 MG Zone 3 2035 $7,469,000 IP-0051 Proposed Piping CIP Water Main Installation - Crescent - Chapel Hill/Sandifur Transmission Main Project #00042 Zone 1-3 2018-2019 $2,507,080 IP-001 Proposed Piping CIP Waterline Extension -Irving Street (West to Road 49) Project #00047 Zone 1 2022 $87,000 IP-003 Proposed Piping CIP Waterline Extension - W Court St to N 3rd St. Zone 1 2022 $30,000 IP-002 Proposed Piping CIP Waterline Extension - Riverhaven Street (Road 36 to Road 40) Project #00048 Zone 1 2023 $305,000 IP-004 Proposed Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Along Empire Dr (West of N 5th Ave) Zone 2 2026 $327,000 DP-012 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Extension - Schuman Lane (West from Road 96) Project #00040 Zone 1 2018 $ 80,000 DP-002 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Richardson Road (Road 92 to Road 96) Project #00043 Zone 1 2019 $460,000 AP-08 Previously Defined Piping CIP Automated Meter Reading Project #00050 System Wide 2019-2023 $4,750,000 Page 17 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-14 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan Project ID Type of Improvement PROJECT TITLE Location Time Frame Cost DP-005 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Road 60 (Pearl Street, Court Street, Agate Street, and 62nd Place) Project #00044 Zone 1 2020 $900,000 DP-007 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Road 76 (Wernett Road to Court Street) Project #00045 Zone 1 2020 $826,000 DP-010 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Extension - Alton Street (Wehe Avenue to the alley west of Owen Street) Project #00046 Zone 2 2021 $153,000 DP-013 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Extension - Road 103 (Maple Street to Willow Way) Project #00049 Zone 1 2023 $113,000 DP-003 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Star Lane (West of Road 97) Zone 1 2024 $113,000 DP-008 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Maple Road (Road 100 to Road 104) CP7.WT.2R.15.20 Zone 1 2024 $300,000 DP-009 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Road 88 (Franklin Road to Court Street) Zone 1 2024 $200,000 DP-006 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Road 80 (North along Agate Street) Zone 1 2025 $125,000 DP-004 Previously Defined Piping CIP Waterline Replacement - Road 84 (Court Street to Argent Road) Zone 2 2025-2026 $450,000 DP-015 Previously Defined Piping CIP Wernett Road Waterline CP7.WT.2A.14.01 Zone 1 2025-2026 $873,000 DP-016 Previously Defined Piping CIP East Airport Waterline (Port of Pasco) Zone 2 2026-2027 $895,000 Notes: 1 Improvement is linked with S-002, S-002-PS and needs to completed concurrently Page 18 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-15 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan Table ES-6 Future Service Area Piping Projects Project ID Type of Improvement Project Title Location Time Frame Cost FP-001 Future Service Area Piping Projects Chapel Hill Boulevard Waterline (DNR Property) Zone 3 2018 $920,000 FP-024 Future Service Area Piping Projects Road 76 (DNR Property) Zone3 2024 $918,000 FP-025 Future Service Area Piping Projects I-182 Crossing (DNR Property) Zone 3 2025 $428,400 FP-017 Future Service Area Piping Projects Waterline Loop - Broadmoor Blvd. Zone 3 2026 $1,420,764 FP-019 Future Service Area Piping Projects Road 68 to Road 52 Waterline Ext. Zone 3 2026-2027 $6,300,060 FP-021 Future Service Area Piping Projects Road 92 (Riverview Service) Zone 1 2027 $440,946 FP-029 Future Service Area Piping Projects Road 52 to N. Glade Rd Transmission Improvements Zone 3 2028 $4,925,000 FP-020 Future Service Area Piping Projects West Pasco Loop Zone 1 2028-2031 $7,645,178 FP-022 Future Service Area Piping Projects Road 68 (Riverview Service) Zone 1 2029 $1,054,000 FP-027 Future Service Area Piping Projects Pasco Kahlotus Rd. Pipe Improvements Zone 2 2029 $2,266,800 FP-026 Future Service Area Piping Projects WAST Property Loop Improvements Zone 2 2030 $428,400 FP-023 Future Service Area Piping Projects Road 52 (Riverview Service) Zone 1 2031 $1,640,160 FP-018 Future Service Area Piping Projects Road 100 Corridor North. Zone 1-3 2031-2034 $11,105,488 FP-028 Future Service Area Piping Projects Tank Farm Transmission Loop Improvements Zone 2 2034 $5,319,000 Note: It is anticipated that funding for these projects will be from the development community to aid in the implementation. The final configuration and phasing of water system improvement will depend on future growth and development needs. The timing and funding of these projects is also dependent on growth and development in the future service areas. Page 19 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-16 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan Table ES-7 Recommended Studies CIP ID Recommended Study Study Area Time Frame Cost O-001 Water System GIS Development System-wide 2019-2022 $50,000-$75,000 O-002 Hillsboro PRV Flow Study Local Study 2019-2022 $5,000-$10,000 O-003 Geocode Water Meters System-wide 2019-2022 $10,000-$20,000 O-004 Demand Study - Characterize Demand Patterns in each Pressure Zone and separate irrigation impacts System-wide 2019-2022 $25,000-$50,000 O-005 Audit of Authorized Unmetered Consumption System-wide 2019-2022 $50,000-$75,000 O-006 Additional Calibration (after pipe inventory validation) System-wide 2019-2022 $10,000-$20,000 ES.7 Financial Plan The cost to operate the City’s Water Utility is based on the following three main categories of expenditure, which are reviewed as part of the annual budgeting process: 1. Operations/maintenance/general administration/taxes; 2. Debt Service; 3. Capital Improvements. The results of the 2015 Rate Study identified that the current rate schedules were not adequate to fund the Water Utility for operations, capital and reserves and that a 5 percent yearly rate increase was required starting in 2016 through 2021. This rate increased was approved by the City Council on November 20, 2015, Ordinance 4252. Additionally, the revenue requirements summarized in Table 8-1, assume that there will be a 2.5 percent rate increase for 2022 and 0 percent for 2023-2027. A “Cost-of-Service” analysis was performed with the goal to maintain equity for the water and sewer utilities. A conservation based (inclining block) rate structure evaluation was completed for the City focusing on the single family residential class, since it represents 87 percent of the total City accounts. The current single family residential rate for the City is composed of a fixed meter charge differentiated by meter size and a uniform rate for all usage. The financial considerations are summarized in Section 8 – Financial Plan. ES.8 Operations and Maintenance Program Staff from the City’s Water Utility are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the treatment and distribution systems through the Water Treatment Plant Division and Water Distribution Division respectively. The Water Utility is structured and currently operated with 19 full-time equivalent employees (FTEs). The City maintains a Water Quality Page 20 of 94 15-1710.4084 Page ES-17 City of Pasco May 2018 Executive Summary Comprehensive Water System Plan Monitoring Program, Emergency Response Program, and Cross Connection Control Program to ensure a high-level service and safety to customers and staff. The review of staffing indicates that the City should at a minimum add 2 FTEs for the implementation of the uni-directional flushing program. The addition of 1 to 3 FTEs should be considered over the next 5 years based on system expansion. This includes West Pasco WTP upgrades to double capacity and require full time onsite staff and implementation of the meter AMI/AMR upgrade program. ES.9 Conclusion In general, the City’s main distribution and transmission system is adequate to provide required flows at adequate pressure under existing and future conditions. There are partially developed areas with inadequate fire service and/or domestic water service that need to be addressed as future infill development occurs. The treatment systems will need to be expanded to meet future peak demands which can be accommodated at the West Pasco WTP. The quality of the water is high without the need for additional treatment to address specific contaminants. The City does need to make an investment in the quality of their data in particular with respect to the continued development of a water system Geographic Information System (GIS). This information will be used to improve the quality of their hydraulic model in addition to tracking the age, material, size and condition of their piping. Improvements to the demand information relative to customer location, availability of non-potable irrigation, and peak usage should also be completed prior to future planning projects. Page 21 of 94 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 10, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, CED Director Workshop Meeting: 5/14/18 FROM: Michael Morales, Deputy Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Establishment of Pasco-Colima Sister City Relationship I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion and consensus to proceed with development of a formal Sister City Agreement. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: The Somos Pasco Economic Development Plan identified a broad range of categories for growth and development in Pasco, including enhancement of our diverse cultural assets. One strategy toward that goal is to establish a “Sister City” relationship with a Mexican community, ideally one from a region where many Pasco residents have their origins. Sister City relationships take on many forms and levels of activity among participants. At the heart of an active and productive Sister Cit y relationship is a steering committee of dedicated residents and businesses with direct interests to serve the goals and strategies of the relationship, including fundraising. Depending on the capacity of each community, typical areas of exchange for sister cities may include: • Commerce, investment and trade; • Cultural promotion and exchange; • Tourism development and promotion; • Municipal capacity development; • Health and social resource exchange; Page 22 of 94 • Educational exchange; and, • Science and Technology exchange. While the Port of Pasco spearheaded and funded Somos Pasco, most strategies require significant city participation and leadership. For that reason, this effort is a collaboration among the Port of Pasco, City of Pasco and community members or businesses. The staff workshop presentation represents this collaboration by the participation of Gary Ballew from the Port and Ana Ruiz-Peralta, a member of the Somos Pasco steering committee and Colima native. We have been in consultation with a team from Colima, led by Valeria Perez Manzo, Secretary of Social Development for the State of Colima. The purpose of the workshop presentation is to impart information on the following topics: • Background of Sister City relationships in Pasco and other cities; • Outline the proposed terms of the relationship; and, • Establish expectations for community involvement, organizational development and financing. With Council support and direction to further develop the relationship, we anticipate that the following items will be developed over the next few months: • Formal agreement with Colima Pasco Sister City; • Organizational Framework; • Calendar/schedule of events; and, • Assign responsibilities; develop method of evaluation and recruit community members. Staff requests Council direction regarding this issue. Page 23 of 94 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 8, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 5/14/18 FROM: David Hare, Fire Chief Fire Department SUBJECT: Community Risk Reduction Program I. REFERENCE(S): City of Pasco Community Reduction Program II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: City Council previously authorized the Community Risk Reduction Specialist position within the Fire Department as part of a comprehensive strategy to improve safety throughout the City. The position was filled early in 2017 and the program has continued to develop and grow since that time. During 2017, the Community Risk Reduction program focused on the identification of risks and the associated hazards that are specific to the City of Pasco, developed intervention strategies to address the hazards and fostered collaborative relationships with community partners. V. DISCUSSION: Prevention is the most cost effective strategy for dealing with emergent situations. The primary goal of the Community Risk Reduction program is to reduce the strain on emergency services by interceding before the emergent event. During the latter part of 2017 and into 2018, developed programs and partnerships are already demonstrating good results. Page 24 of 94 The program desires to advocate for personal and community safety through education and the leveraging of the specialized skills of our community partners to meet the individualized needs of the population. Ultimately, by providing a planned collaborative approach, the Community Risk Reduction Program will allow citizens to continue to live independently and reduce the demand strain on emergency services. Page 25 of 94 City of Pasco 2017 Community Risk Analysis and Risk Reduction Plan Ben Shearer Page 26 of 94 Introduction The City of Pasco Fire Department, like many other fire departments across the nation are being challenged by budget crises, rising call volumes, personnel and equipment shortages, security issues and the overall public expectation to do more with less. Expectations placed on the fire service, including Emergency Medical Services (EMS), response to natural disasters, hazardous materials incidents, technical rescue and acts of terrorism, have steadily increased. Traditionally, the focus of risk assessment was the identification of fire hazards an d planning an appropriate response force to mitigate the emergency. Today, the risk assessment goes well beyond the fire problem and includes medical and other emergencies. Community risk assessment begins with the identification of the hazards present within the community and the understanding that the risk of fire, medical, or other emergencies cannot be held to zero. Community risk level is typically established through an overall profile of the community based on the unique mixtures of demographics, socioeconomic factors, occupancy risk, fire management zones, etc. and the overall level of services currently provided. The assessment of community hazards and associated risks are usually divided into three categories:  Life  Property  Critical infrastructure The objective of this document is to clearly define an overall risk profile for the City of Pasco and to identify a plan of action that will reduce the overall risk to the community to an acceptable level while factoring the maximum savings of life and property that is fiscally and morally responsible. In a nut shell, the goal is to create a safer community for anyone who lives in, works in, or travels through our community. The Community Risk Analysis process is defined as a process to identify and prioritize local risks, followed by the integrated and strategic investment of resources to reduce their occurrence and impact. Page 27 of 94 Community Risk Reduction (CRR) is not a new concept for the fire service. Fire departments have been actively involved in fire prevention for many years through public education, building Surveys and other activities. Although there is no specific blueprint for developing CRR plans, there are some common and essential steps. Risk assessment is basically the identification of potential and likely risks within a particular community, and the process of prioritizing those risks. It is the critical initial step in emergency preparedness, which enables organizations to eventually mitigate (if possible), plan, prepare and deploy appropriate resources to attain a desired outcome. 1A – Community Risk Assessment In order to properly quantify the risks and hazards of the City of Pasco, the overall risk profile of Franklin County must also be considered. The City of Pasco is the county seat for Franklin County in southeastern Washington State. The County is generally characterized by a rising upland, with an elevation ranging from approximately 300 feet above sea level at its southern end to approximately 1000 feet in the northeast corner. The County is arid and averages less than ten inches of rainfall per year. The County is intersected by a major drainage (Esquatzel Coulee) as well as a number of lesser canyons and drainages. The underlying stratigraphy is characterized by numerous volcanic flows of basalt alternating with sands and other loessial materials which accumulated between various periods of historic volcanic activity. The area receives an average of about 10 days of snowfall and 8 days of rainfall annually. The median monthly temperatures range from a low of 30.6 degrees Fahrenheit in January to a July high of 75.7 degrees Fahrenheit (although the region usually experiences periods of excessive heat >100 degrees Fahrenheit and extreme cold < 10 degrees Fahrenheit at times during the year). High wind velocities, with peak gusts as high as 70 mph or higher can be expected at any time during the year with associated frontal incursions. Franklin County and the City of Pasco are accessible by several modes of transportation. Major highways, railroads, marine ports, and an airport are located within the City of Pasco boundaries. Interstate 182 runs through and connects the City with major markets to the east and west. US 395 is the primary north-south highway and runs through the eastern portion of the City and connects with Interstate 182. The Burlington Northern-Sante Fe Railroad operates a major switching yard within the City limits along the main east-west rail line that connects the Tri-Cities to Spokane and Portland, Ore. The Port of Pasco operates waterfront facilities that service barge traffic on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. The Port of Pasco Tri-Cities Airport (FAA Index B) is located on the northern boundary of the City. Page 28 of 94 The Pasco Airport (PSC) has three runways. Two runways are utilized by commercial aviation with the third runway used primarily by general aviation. PSC has experienced significant growth (34% - 2008 to 2011) in passenger enplanements. PSC is the fourth largest airport in the state and has 150 acres of commercial and industrial property on site. The City of Pasco planning department reported that as of 2016, there were 22,282 single family residential units and 430 multi-family occupancies in the city and that 35% of the urban growth area is designated as Industrial. Franklin County Emergency Management completed an extensive county-wide hazard assessment study in 2011. This study quantified and ranked the primary hazard concerns for the City of Pasco. The hazard concerns are listed in priority order below: 1. Severe Storm 2. Flood 3. Fire Severe Storm – The effects upon the City of Pasco resulting from a severe storm such as a thunderstorm, tornado, windstorm, ice storm, or snowstorm are likely to be similar in nature. Downed trees and power lines, interruption of transportation routes, and damage to homes, businesses, and governmental buildings are all possible and will affect emergency response forces. The hazard assessment ranks severe storms as a high probability with associated moderate risk to lives and property. Flood – The City of Pasco is located west of the confluence of the Snake and Columbia rivers and is part of the Yakima Delta. The threat of flooding in the City of Pasco is greatest in the months of December through February although flooding events may occur during other months of the year. Winter flood events have the potential to produce the highest peak flows when significant snowfall is present, followed by rapidly rising temperatures and/or heavy rains. The hazard assessment ranks flooding as a moderate probability and moderate risk to lives and property. Fire – The Pasco Fire Department (PFD) experiences twice the regional median average of fires per 1,000 of population. Human and Technological Hazards Hazardous Materials Hazardous materials incidents pose a significant threat to the City of Pasco. A hazardous materials incident can originate from a fixed facility or from any transportation medium. The manufacture, use, transportation, storage and disposal of hazardous material products and dangerous wastes poses a potential risk to the Page 29 of 94 public health, safety and welfare, private and governmental properties, and the environment. The U.S. Department of Transportation classifies a material as hazardous if it is corrosive, explosive, toxic, flammable, biologically irritating, radioactive, or packaged in a dangerous container. These materials are regulated while in transit, and when stored on site by a variety of local, state, and federal guidelines. Federal regulations, such as Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, have made it easier for local governmental agencies to track the presence of hazardous materials in their jurisdictions. Franklin County and the City of Pasco has suffered both transportation and fixed facility hazardous materials accidents. Most incidents have involved petroleum products, or agricultural products such as anhydrous ammonia. There has been a massive increase of the transportation of Baakan Crude Oil and Coal through Franklin County and the cities of Connell, Mesa and Pasco. Major incidents include a 1996 release of 2000 gallons of anhydrous ammonia in downtown Pasco, forcing residential evacuation and sending over 100 people to be evaluated at the hospital, and a July 2011 train derailment involving methane gas on the Ainsworth artery. Hazardous materials incidents occur suddenly and can cause damage to people and property without any warning. The impact of this type of emergency can last from a few minutes to weeks, months and even years before damage to the environment could be repaired. Any incident in which hazardous materials are involved has the potential for escalation from a relatively minor incident into a full scale disaster. The hazardous properties of chemicals, motor fuels, radioactive substances and other potentially dangerous materials range from highly flammable to explosive to poisonous. These chemicals have the ability to contaminate the environment with quantities harmful to human, animal and plant life. The potential for loss of life, extensive property damage, environmental contamination, and economic loss always remains high when hazardous materials are involved. The effects of a hazardous materials incident vary depending on such factors as the type and quantity of material(s) involved, the location, time of day, and weather conditions. In the case of airborne contaminants, wind speed and direction are extremely important for response procedures and capabilities. Mass evacuation or widespread shelter-in-place should be considered a high priority when dealing with airborne or potential airborne contamination. Pandemics A pandemic event will affect the City of Pasco personnel resources. Normally, influenza epidemics occur annually and usually peak between December and March in temperate regions in the Northern Hemisphere. In the United States, annual influenza Page 30 of 94 epidemics are associated with an average of 36,000 deaths and more than 110,000 hospitalizations. Based on previous pandemics, attack rates for influenza in a community during a pandemic are likely to be as high as 35%. Although influenza cases and deaths are likely to occur over a several month period throughout the U.S., within the community most of the impact is likely to occur within 4 to 8 weeks. Health care demands are likely to increase substantially during a pan demic while simultaneously the City is likely to see a decrease in response personnel resources. These demands will likely lead to critical shortages and increased personnel costs. In addition to the increased overall need for health care services, illness and death patterns during pandemic events may differ substantially from those seen during non - pandemic years when older adults and persons with compromised immune systems primarily are at risk for serious disease and death. During the three pandemics of the 20th century, a substantial portion of the total deaths occurred among persons younger than 65 years who would not be considered at high risk during non -pandemic years. Higher rates of work absenteeism are likely to occur as employees become ill o r need to care for ill family members. Terrorism/Hostile Action The City of Pasco has several potential targets of interest for terrorist groups and/or are potential “soft targets” for hostile actions (active shooter). There are several large facilities that have extremely hazardous chemicals in their inventory, the county seat and city administration facilities are all located within close proximity of each other. Additionally, the City of Pasco is a transportation hub for rail, barge, vehicular and aviation travel. The Ice Harbor Dam is located 7 miles north of the city on the Snake River and there is a very large agricultural and food industry in the city that is susceptible to biological terrorism. As of 2017, the Pasco School District funded 22 public schools within the city limits. The Columbia Basin College is also located within the city limits as well as two private schools. Summary of Human and Technological Risks Hazard Probability Risk Hazardous Materials Moderate High Pandemic Low Moderate Terrorism/Hostile Action Low Moderate Human and Technological Risks – Conclusion With the exception of a Pandemic, the human and technological risks are classified as relatively low frequency – moderate risk. These events will require specialized response capabilities such as Hazardous Materials Response Teams, Special Weapons and Tactics Teams, etc. The magnitude and duration of the event(s) can range the Page 31 of 94 spectrum from acute (short-lived) to long term. The primary effects are likely to be economic and loss of life. Transportation Risks Aviation The Tri-Cities Airport (FAA Index B), located in the north-central portion of the City of Pasco, is the largest airport in southeastern Washington and the fourth largest airport in the state of Washington with enplanements in excess of 300,000 per year (2014 - 2016). The airport is serviced by four commercial passenger airlines, commercial cargo services, charters, military and private aircraft. The Pasco Fire Department responds to an average of 10 aviation incidents per year. The majority of these incidents are categorized as Alert 1 (the lowest risk category). The major effects of an aircraft crash are dependent on the size of the aircraft, location and path of crash, and number of passengers and would include mass casualties/fatalities, fire/explosion, hazardous materials release and property damage. Railroad The BNSF maintains the largest switching yard west of the Mississippi River in east Pasco. A 2016 Hazardous Materials Commodity Flow Through study conducted by BNSF indicated that the switch yard serviced 175,007 tank cars either partially or fully loaded with hazardous materials from all nine of the Department of Transportation hazard classifications. The BNSF and Union Pacific maintain approximately 75 miles of railway adjacent to the Columbia and Snake Rivers. These railways transport five Bakken oil trains per day. Bakken oil is a light sweet crude oil, with volatility comparable to gasoline making it extremely flammable and hazardous. Highway The City of Pasco is bisected by Interstate I-182 (running east/west) and U.S. Route 395 (running north/south). Due to an increasing population, and the inter-modal methods of transportation that are supported in Pasco, vehicular traffic and accidents volumes continue to increase. Page 32 of 94 Marine The Tesoro and Tidewater Pasco Terminals located in the Port of Pasco on the Snake River provide regional barge and rail terminal service and storage of petroleum, fertilizer, chemicals, and bio-fuels. Tidewater Barge Lines is the largest inland marine transportation company west of the Mississippi River. Tidewater offers a comprehensive range of onshore and offshore cleaning and waste transportation services to the marine and industrial business markets. Tidewater transports refined petroleum products and bio-blends in 8 double hulled barges with a capacity of 264,000 barrels. Tesoro Logistics LP is a full-service logistics company operating, through its subsidiaries in the western and mid-continent regions of the United States. Tesoro owns and operates over 4,000 miles of crude oil, refined products and natural gas pipelines, as well as 41 crude oil and refined products truck, marine and storage terminals and has over 26 million barrels of storage capacity. The Pasco Tesoro Logistics site maintains 26 tanks with a potential capacity of over 500,000 barrels of primarily contain gasoline and other fuel products. Summary of Transportation Risks Hazard Probability Risk Aviation Low Moderate Railroad High Moderate Highway High Moderate Marine Low Low Transportation Risk – Conclusion The City of Pasco serves as a transportation hub in southeastern Washington. Transportation hazards are unique in that the frequency and magnitude can be minimized. Using the threat matrix for transportation risks, the Pasco Fire Department must maintain a highly trained response force in heavy and light vehicle and machinery extrication, aircraft rescue and firefighting skills , hazardous materials response and water rescue. Community Overview The City of Pasco is a robust multi-cultural community with a rich history. Inhabitants have thrived along the banks of the Columbia and Snake Rivers for many years. Evidence of the earliest known inhabitants in the Western Hemisphere was found in northern Franklin County at the Marmes Rockshelter, near Lyons Ferry and Palouse Falls (approximately 35 miles northeast of Pasco ). In 1805, the Lewis and Clark Expedition camped at the confluence of the Snake and Columbia Rivers. In the Page 33 of 94 late 1800’s the Northern Pacific Railroad brought a rush of settlers to the Washington Territory and the railroad town of Pasco was born. The City of Pasco was incorporated on September 3, 1891. Pasco is the second largest in population of the three cities that regionally comprise the Tri-Cities area in southeastern Washington State. The city currently encompasses approximately 37 square miles that includes over 13 river miles of water front, with an additional seven square miles designated as the urban growth boundary. Population The 2010 census reported a population of 59,781 with a density of 1960 inhabitants per square mile. There were 18,782 housing units with an average density of 615.8 per square mile. The 2016 postcensal estimate of total housing units provided by the Washington State Office of Financial Management is 22,282 at an average density of 655.4 per square mile. The 2016 population data of the city is 70,560 with a population density of 2075 per square mile. The population demographic is 55.4% Hispanic, 1.8% African American, .3% Native American, 2.2% Asian, 0.1% Pacific Islander, and 38.5% white alone . Hispanic or Latino of any race comprised 55.7% of the population.  Hispanic 55.4%  White Alone 38.5%  Asian Alone 2.2%  Black Alone 1.8%  Two or more races 1.7%  American Indian 0.3%  Other Race 0.7%  Pacific Islander 0.1% The 2010 census reported the median age in the city was 27.3 years. 35.5% of residents were under the age of 18; 10.6% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 29.9% were from 25 to 44: 17.2% were from 45 to 64; and 6.7% were 65 years or older. Males represented 51.8% of the population and females represented 48.2% of the population. Page 34 of 94 Economics Pasco has the lowest assessed value, lowest per capita income levels, lowest per capita sales tax revenue and the highest unemployment rates of the greater Tri-Cities region. The not seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for the City of Pasco is at 8.2% as of August 2013 (1% higher than the national average). The per capita income in Pasco is 37.1% less than the Washington average and 32.7% less than the National average. The median household income is 24.7% less than the Washington average and 14.7% less than the national average. The poverty level in Pasco is 111.3% greater than the Washington average and 89.4% greater than the National average. The median household income is $60,054 (approximately $4,000 below the Washington State average), and the per capita income is $21,804. The City’s economy is directly based on agriculture and related food processing and transportation. The Pasco Processing Center (a 240-acre industrial park designed for the food processing industry) was constructed in 1995. Several large food pro cessors have built plants that utilize this facility. The Hanford Reservation, located in Benton County, encompasses approximately 560 sq. miles and contains various nuclear and nuclear-related projects. Today, the focus of the Hanford Reservation is on energy research, environmental remediation/waste management and related technology. The economy of Pasco has been affected for the past several years by incidents that include; manufacturing sector slowdown, inflation increases and corporate bankruptcies, layoffs and relocations, terrorism and energy pricing. Employment Several key critical infrastructures and major transportation hubs are located within the city boundaries of Pasco. The Tri-Cities Airport, a containerized port facility which serves extensive containerized barge traffic, and the largest rail switching yards west of the Mississippi River for the BNSF railroad are all located within the city limits. The City of Pasco is also bisected by Interstate I-182 (running east/west) and U.S. Route 395 (running north/south). Pasco is home to all of the local governmental facilities for Franklin County. Facilities such as the courthouse, county jail, Franklin County Emergency Management and county dispatch center are all located within the city limits. Pasco also has over 22 primary and secondary schools and is home to the largest public two-year community college in southeastern Washington. Primarily due to the agricultural region, Pasco is home to several food processing companies such as ConAgra Foods, Reser’s Fine Foods, Pasco Processing, and Twin City Foods. In recent years, the region has become a large player and provider in Washington State’s wine industry. Gordon Brothers Cellars, Fidelitas Winery, Kamiak Vineyards and Preston Premium Wines have a presence in and around the city of Pasco. Page 35 of 94 City of Pasco Risk Analysis - Methodology The Pasco Fire Department must thoroughly understand their community and the risks within the community. There are various risk/consequence or risk/probability matrices available; but regardless of the labels on the axis, they usually fall into one of the quadrants in the following figure. Utilizing data including event types, frequency of events, and resource needs the following risk analysis can be completed. As the risk is generally quantified into one of the four quadrants, a decision is made based upon the level of risk. It is important to recognize that it is improbable, impractical and unaffordable to completely eliminate risk to the community. Using a matrix assists fire department officials in determining the acceptable level of risk. The four quadrants in the figure below may be defined as follows:  Low impact/Low probability – Risks in the bottom left corner are low level, with acceptable consequences if the incident occurs. These can often be considered an acceptable risk and require no further action.  Low impact/High probability – Risks in the top left corner are moderate level – if the incident happens, the fire department can usually handle it with existing resources. However, effort should be given to reduce the likelihood that these incidents occur.  High impact/low probability – Risks in the bottom right corner are high level if they do occur, but they are very unlikely to happen. Risks in this quadrant are prime candidates for training and contingency planning.  High impact/High probability – Risks toward the top right corner are critical. These should be the highest priorities for the fire department and for the community. Aggressive action is required such as staffing for these risks, equipping for these risks, and engaging the community i n risk reduction and preparedness. Page 36 of 94 Risk Attributes and Vulnerability Response Statistics The Master Plan study conducted by ESCI compared the Pasco Fire Department to similar sized fire agencies within the 13 western states using the NFPA benchmark data for 2015. The conclusion reached by ESCI is that the Pasco Fire Department is a “very busy” primarily suburban fire department. The chart below indicates the breakdown of major incident types for 2015. During the Master Planning process, Emergency Services Consulting International, determined that the Pasco Fire Department responded to 74.7 emergencies per 1,000 population in its service area, which is eight more responses per 1,000 population served (or 544 total responses more per year) than the regional median. 66.7 74.7 60 65 70 75 80 Regional Median Total Incidents per 1,000 population - 2015 PFD Page 37 of 94 Historical analysis of call volume (2011-2015) as compared to population increase for the same time frame shows that the call volume increased an average of 16.9% per year while the population increase averaged 13.7% per year. Overlapping calls are a significant issue for the Pasco Fire Department. Overlapping calls are defined as calls for service that occur while the primary response unit is already engaged in a previous emergency. These calls require secondary stations to cover the emergency resulting in longer response times and greater out of service times for units. The chart below shows the percent of overlapping calls for the 2011- 2015 time frames. Overlapping Call Percentage per Year 2011 30.77% 2012 30.34% 2013 31.68% 2014 32.35% 2015 36.28% Geographic Call Distribution ESCI plotted the incident locations and calculated the mathematical density of the 2013-2015 service demand for the PFD service area. The PFD service demand is concentrated in the central core area of the City of Pasco, between Station 81 and Highway 395. The commercial corridor along Rd. 68 as well as the residential neighborhoods north of I-182 experience higher incident demand density. As the 4232 4397 4331 4701 5097 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Call Volume Page 38 of 94 northwest area of the city begins to “fill-in” it is expected that the demand for service in that area will trend towards the same levels as that of the central core of the city. Fire incidents are the least frequent in the data set. However, incidents categorized as fires are equally distributed throughout the city in a similar pattern to the overall service demand. These fires have been located in the central section of the city between Station 81 and Hwy. 395 and south of I-182 to the southern urban growth boundary. Page 39 of 94 Statistically, fires represent one of the lowest probabilities of “traditional municipal” occurrence at 5.8% of total call volume (combining all event responses) and the highest resource usage, thus falling in the high risk category. Historically, the PFD has responded to an average of 1 structural fire every week, and a fire event every 35.04 hours. Fires represent an important factor in the risk assessment process because of the regularity of occurrence and the resource demands that are placed upon the department and the community in the form of increased need for social service interaction to the victim(s), additional support from the community gover nment (building inspection for re-occupancy, police involvement for additional patrols, etc.) and a greater resource demand on the “micro-community” (family, workforce, etc.). Further, fire loss has a negative financial and public image impact to the com munity. Increasing fire loss reduces property values and results in diminishing General Fund revenues. The results of fire can also be detrimental to the future prospects of the community by affecting homeowner insurance ratings, property values, etc. The Pasco Fire Department has responded to an average of 53 structural fires per year since 2007. Analysis of the fire problem within the City of Pasco indicates that the department responded to 535 structural fires from January 1, 2007 to May 1, 2017. A “deeper dive” into the statistics show that 33% of the recorded structural fires occurred in multi-family units. Of the structural fires noted, 35% are caused by cooking issues. Further analysis indicates that 45% of all cooking fires occur in multi-family structures. Page 40 of 94 Temporal statistical data indicates that cooking fires tend to occur during the expected time frames based upon activity schedules of the populations. There was no significant statistical evidence that supported specific days of the week. The cooking fires by hour of the day statistics support the anecdotal data that cooking fires usually occur at the times that residents are preparing meals and mirror the greater temporal response statistics. Fire Analysis Cooking Fires represent:  High impact/High probability – These should be the highest priorities for the fire department and for the community. Aggressive action is required such as staffing for these risks, equipping for these risks, and engaging the community in risk reduction and preparedness.  Multi-family residential occupancies represent 2% of the total occupancies within the City, but represent 45% of the cooking fires call frequency. Page 41 of 94 Property Insurance information The chart below graphically represents data obtained from the office of financial management of Washington State. The chart below shows the insurance information for Pasco from 2015. Red indicates insufficient insurance coverage, blue indicates sufficient insurance coverage. This is significant in that it shows that half of Pasco is underinsured against loss from fire. When a fire happens and the occupant is not insured against loss, they have to rely on community resources to keep them stable. If the building is not covered for the full loss, the building sits as an eyesore even longer. “In Pasco, most buildings sit vacant for at least 18 months before repairs are made and reinhabited”. Troy Hendren, City of Pasco Fire Marshall. Page 42 of 94 Medical Services Statistical Analysis EMS calls also fall into the high risk category primarily due to the increased frequency and thus the increased exposure risk to crews and lower unit availability times. The department percentage of EMS calls as compared to total call volume average 78.7% per year. The Pasco Fire Department assisted 34830 patients during the sample time period. Individual EMS calls typically place a relatively low resource demand on the department as most EMS calls require the response of only one or two units. As the incident complexity increases (due to patient disposition and manpower requirements) more units are dispatched to assist in patient care. With increasing call volumes, the “over-lapping” of calls (as described above) negatively impacts unit availabilities. The risk of EMS calls is usually contained to the responding crews (injury and disease exposure) and can be minimized with proper training and equipment. The greater risk to the community is the resource drawdowns that occu r with increased service demand and unit availability. Female patients represent 48% of the population demographics and yet represent 52% of the total EMS response demographics. The average age by gender for EMS patients is indicated in the chart below. The median age of the population in the City of Pasco is 28.6 years, and the average age of patients served by the Pasco Fire Department is 50.75 years of age. In November of 2015, The FCS Group completed an ambulance services rate study. The study considered response data from several years. The following table considers response data from 2014 only. Page 43 of 94 Customer Class Number of Calls Percentage of Calls Single Family 1362 39% Multi-Family 815 24% Commercial/Business 577 17% Nursing Homes 109 3% Public 541 16% Miscellaneous 61 2% Given the current and projected population growth rate of the City of Pasco, The FCS Group estimates that the demand for EMS services will increase at a rate of 2% per year for the foreseeable future. This would equate to an annual increase of 80-100 additional calls for service. As noted in the fire problem analysis, EMS calls to multi-family residents represent a statistically significant issue in that the call volume per multi-family occupancy tends to be higher than that of the single family resident. The table below indicates the primary patient complaints to the dispatch center. COMPLAINT REPORTED TO DISPATCH # INCIDENTS Abdominal Pain 1723 Allergies 209 Animal Bite 51 Assault 664 Back Pain 770 Breathing Problem 2901 Burns 56 Cardiac Arrest 479 Chest Pain 2497 Choking 253 CO Poisoning/Hazmat 6 Convulsions/Seizure 1764 Diabetic Problem 694 Drowning 24 Electrocution 3 Eye Problem 28 Fall Victim 3528 Headache 264 Heart Problems 133 Heat/Cold Exposure 48 Hemorrhage/Laceration 214 Industrial Accident 18 Ingestion/Poisoning 468 MCI (Mass Casualty Incident)10 Not Applicable 3617 Pregnancy/Childbirth 257 Psychiatric Problem 760 Sick Person 5324 Stab/Gunshot Wound 102 Stroke/CVA 588 Traffic Accident 2714 Transfer/Interfacility/Palliative Care 156 Traumatic Injury 1886 Unconscious/Fainting 1703 Unknown Problem Man Down 918 Page 44 of 94 Review of the EMS responder’s impression of patient chief complaints indicate that 70.51% of all transported patients fall into one of six categories; traumatic injury, abdominal pain/problem, chest pain/discomfort, altered level of consciousness, respiratory distress, and seizure disorder. The chart below indicates the responder’s impression. The average co st per inci dent for In Cit y incidents is $1,943, and currentl y, the average transpo rt fee and u tility rate revenue only support $952 of the cost . This is about a 49% cost recovery per incident . EMS Analysis  Low impact/High probability – if the incident happens, the fire department can usually handle it with existing resources. However, effort should be given to reduce the likelihood that these incidents occur.  Multi-family residential occupancies represent 2% of the total occupancies within the City, but represent 24% of the EMS call frequency. Page 45 of 94 Event Probability of Occurrence There are various methods for calculating the probability of occurrence. For the purposes of this document percentage of event types were averaged over a five-year time frame (2011-2015). The event type percentage used to calculate probability of events for this deployment standard is described in the following charts. Based upon the historical trends presented thus far, it is reasonable to extrapolate that calls for service will continue to trend upwards. We can assume that the event type probability will remain fairly constant, and that based upon historical, geographical and temporal analysis that the calls will continue to occur in the central corridor and northwest portions of the city and be fairly consistent with the activity level of the population. It is also reasonable to project that the primary event categories will be EMS, Service Calls (which include lift assists, burning complaints, etc.), False/Other (which include inadvertent alarm activations, vicinity alarms, etc.) and Fires which can be sub-categorized as structural, wildland, and vehicle. Calls for service utilize available resources. This resource draw must be considered in the risk analysis. The following chart identifies the average number of responders to the event types. FIRE STRUCTURE FIRE WILDLAND FIRE VEHICLE FIRE OTHER EMS HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS TECHNICAL RESCUE SERVICE ARFF FALSE/OTHER EVENT TYPE 2011 -2015 AVG # OF RESPONDERS 10 3 6 2 6 4 6 5 2 4 FIRE STRUCTURE FIRE WILDLAND FIRE VEHICLE FIRE OTHER EMS HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS TECHNICAL RESCUE SERVICE ARFF FALSE/OTHER 0.17% 328 7.21% 6 0.13% 300 45 0.99% 106 2.33% 6.57% 78.84% 56 1.35% 8 3589 57 1.25% 56 1.25% EVENT TYPE AVG # OF CALLS PROBABILITY % 2011 -2015 Page 46 of 94 Target Hazard Assessment Target hazards are locally defined occupancies that pose specific risks to occupants and the fire service responders. Critical infrastructure is a term used by governments to describe assets that are essential for the functioning of a society and economy. The City of Pasco has identified several target hazards and critical infrastructures within its boundaries. The table below identifies the number of facilities that are considered critical to the functioning of the community and/or that present a significant risk to responders or occupants. Target Hazard/Critical Infrastructure Number Governmental Facilities – Includes local, county, federal and Port 11 Assisted Living Centers/Under Age Day Care 124 Community Shelter 2 Schools – includes elementary, secondary, and College 23 Transportation – Airports, Rail, Barge, Bus 6 Water/Sewage Treatment Facilities 4 Communications 5 Emergency Operations Center 1 Public Utilities 2 Hazardous Materials Bulk Storage 5 Healthcare (Not including Private Practice) 2 Highrise (75 ft. or greater) 3 Multi-Family Residential 430 Single family residential units represent the highest percentage of buildings within the City of Pasco (16,715). There are 430 multi-family residences located within the City. The City of Pasco has issued an average of 2600 building permits over the last five years (2011-2016) and most of the building permits have been for single family residential units. Page 47 of 94 Community Risk Priorities Based on the assessment of incident and demographic data from the last ten years the top three priorities for community risk have been identified. These are potential risks and community impacts that can ultimately be reduced/mitigated through the implementation of various strategies; which will be addressed through a comprehensive community risk reduction plan. Risk One – Cooking Fires The number one fire risk based on probability and impact to the community, is cooking related fires. Many these calls were confined to the kitchen area. However, in residences without smoke alarms or incidents were the occupant had left the cooking area, there was a much higher magnitude of damage to the occupancy. It should be noted that this confirms the national statistics, in which kitchen fires statistically lead the nation for fire responses. In Pasco, a disproportionate number of cooking fires happened in multi-family housing as compared to single family residences. Data from the last ten years suggests that thirty percent of fire calls involved multi-family housing, and for forty-five percent of our cooking fires. Risk Two- EMS calls for Slip, Trip, and Falls The data indicates that several event categories represent a high percentage of the total EMS call volume. However, most of these categories are very broad and generalized for example; sick or breathing problems. It is difficult to develop a plan for reducing these event types. The category of falls can be successfully addressed. Risk Three- Ems Category “Not Applicable” It may seem odd for a category of Not Applicable to be a risk to a community. However as noted in several places in this report, the number of calls for service are increasing every year and if not addressed, we can expect the percentage of “not applicable” to increase as well. Without reliable and quantifiable data potential issues are not identified and systemic inefficiencies and effectiveness are not measured. This will result in increased costs and lost opportunities. The importance of insuring quality data cannot be over- emphasized. Page 48 of 94 Intervention Strategies The Community Risk Reduction (CRR) model categorizes interventions into the 5 “E’s” (Education, Engineering, Enforcement, and Economic Incentives, Emergency Response). Education- Education can influence behavior by increasing awareness, and providing information and knowledge with the intention of producing a desired behavior. Education is only effective if individuals apply this knowledge appropriately. Education needs to be culturally competent for the message to reach its audience. Engineering- Engineering applies to changes in the physical environment. Modifying a product or environment to prevent or mitigate injury, death or destruction of property is an engineering tactic. Enforcement- Enforcement applies to reducing risks through the legislative process of strengthening and/or the adoption of applicable laws. This may include inspection programs or methods, and in some cases, can impose penalties for non-compliance. Economic Incentives- There are two kinds of Economic incentives. Negative incentives are fines, tickets, or other punishment for “inappropriate behavior” intended to discourage unsafe behaviors. Positive incentives are rewards or gifts for choosing positive behaviors or choices. Programs like free smoke alarms are examples of positive incentives. Emergency Response – Emergency Response is defined as, having enough manpower and proper equipment to mitigate an emergency when it happens in your community. Statistical evidence suggests that the ratio of responders to the population in Pasco is below the National Standards, thus necessitating the higher priority of prevention. The following tables address each of the identified risk and the associated intervention based upon the 5 “E’s” described above. Short-term goals are anticipated to be implemented within 12 months, mid-term goals are within 3-5 years and long-term goals are 5-10 years. As with all plans, this document needs to be reviewed periodically to assure relevance and measure the success of the prevention strategies listed. Page 49 of 94 Risk One- Cooking Fires: Cooking fires are a High impact/High probability risk in our community. Program Goal: Reduce the number of cooking fires and their effects through education and in home safety assessments, especially in Multi-Family occupancies. Resources Required: Smoke Alarms, Printed materials, Audio/ Visual equipment Installation equipment, Training of on duty crews. Premise Statement Projects Short-Term Goals Intermediate Goals Long-Term Goals Education: Cooking fires can be minimized or prevented by education. Develop multi- cultural educational materials and in home safety inspections that reinforce safe cooking practices. Identify “at risk” populations and occupancies. Host activities at public and multi housing events to distribute information, and invitations for home safety surveys. Engineering: Smoke Alarms will provide early warning of fire danger, reducing event severity. Distribute and install fire detection and suppression equipment to at risk populations Monitor success of smoke alarm program. Develop building codes requiring residential sprinklers. Enforcement: Collaborate with the Inspection Services to develop and reinforce the safety messages. Obtain information from the Rental Inspection program to identify occupancies where more education is needed. Develop in home safety inspection program. Perform voluntary in home safety inspections when requested. Merge fire department and inspection services. Economic: Loss from fire has a negative impact on the General Fund. Connect people with insurance providers to find the coverage they need. Identify community partners that will assist in restoration projects. Achieve a reduction in property loss due to cooking fires. Emergency Response: Early warning of cooking fires will reduce the incident complexity. Development of a program that identifies at risk occupancies and at risk populations. Adopt and follow the recommendations of the Pasco Fire Department Master Plan Achieve WSRB rating of 4 or better. . Rational: Assumptions: Cooking fires have a large financial and service impact to the community. The impacts to the community can be reduced through education and early warning and suppression of cooking fires. External expectations: The reduction of cooking fires will have a positive effect on the achievement of a WSRB Class 4 rating of the community. Page 50 of 94 Risk Two - Injuries and deaths from slips, trips and falls. Program Goal: With collaborative partnerships, provide Safety Education and in-home assessments to prevent future instances. Resources Required: Safety equipment, Printed materials, Audio/Visual equipment, Installation equipment, and Community Partners. Premise Statement Projects Short-Term Goals Intermediate Goals Long-Term Goals Education: “At risk” populations are often unaware of the slip, trip, fall dangers in their homes. Utilize local, regional and national resources to develop a slip, trip and fall prevention program. Identify “at risk” populations through field data collection and referrals from local service organizations Develop referral process in order to provide education to “at risk:” populations Engineering: The probability of slip, trip, falls may be reduced through the use of adjunct equipment. Provide voluntary in-home assessments and education for “at risk” populations Develop collaborative partnerships with local service organizations to provide low cost in home engineering solutions Enforcement: Emergent care providers do not provide preventative solutions to slip, trip, fall hazards. Develop a referral program to provide “follow up” in home assessments for at risk populations. Reduce the incidents of repeat slip, trip, and fall occurrences. Economic: Slip, trip and fall hazards can be reduced through education and engineering. Provide early in- home assessment and education to reduce strain on EMS system. Develop collaborative relationships with area hospitals to provide early in- home assessments and education to at risk populations Reduce strain on entire EMS system by providing alternative long- term care and monitoring of at risk populations. Emergency Response: Reduction of slip, trip, fall hazards will provide higher unit availabilities. Develop training for recognizing and reporting of at risk populations for slip, trip, and fall hazards. Match the incident resource needs to the incident complexity. Provide comprehensive patient, in-home assessments and follow up to identify early signs of slip, trip and fall hazards. Rational: Assumptions: Early intervention with “at risk” populations will reduce strain on EMS systems. Slip, Trip and Fall hazards can be reduced through education and engineering solutions. External expectations: Reduction of slip, trip, fall occurrences will decrease strain on the EMS system and provide opportunities for community collaboration programs. Page 51 of 94 Risk Three - The “Not-Applicable” EMS event type is difficult to quantify. This event type can range from non-emergent, no transport incidents to those incidents that do not “fit” into the identified categories. Program Goal: Correctly identify and categorize EMS events. Resources Required: Focused training of responders and data analysts in order to correctly categorized events. Premise Statement Projects Short-Term Goals Intermediate Goals Long-Term Goals Education: “Field” data collection is inconsistent and inaccurate. Provide consistent and regular training to EMS responders in order to correctly categorize emergent event types. Regularly audit “not applicable” category. Evaluate impacts of findings on department programs and finances. Reduce inconsistency in reporting. Engineering: Without accurate and reliable data, program needs cannot be determined. Evaluate impacts of findings on department programs Determine and develop programs to reduce service impacts and costs Enforcement: A system needs to be developed to prove the accuracy of field data. Develop processes and policies in that the “not applicable” category choice triggers automatic QA review. Develop policy and procedures that address record accuracy. Develop procedures within the RMS to automatically queue these event types for further review and categorization Economic: Accurate data is foundational to determination of accurate costs. Correctly categorize “not applicable” events in order to improve financial reimbursement percentages Improve ability to capture EMS service provision costs and improve financial reimbursement percentages. Emergency Response: Event types determine unit utilization. Determine resource allocation to fit the event needs. Reduction of over- lapping calls and provide better resource utilization. Rational: Assumptions: Unquantifiable data decreases service efficiencies and increases service costs. Accurate reporting will identify community needs and increase response effectiveness. External expectations: Increasing response effectiveness and efficiency will provide for better unit utilization and reduce overall costs and increase reimbursement percentages. Page 52 of 94 Works Cited Pasco Fire Department Emergency Services Master Plan – Summer 2016 Prepared by: Don Bivins, Jim Mooney, Martin Goughnout, Rob Strong, Stuart McElhaney Emergency Services Consulting International Standards of Cover – February 2017 Prepared by: David Hare, Asst. Fire Chief – Pasco Fire Department Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan – 2015 Prepared by: Franklin County Emergency Management Region 8 Healthcare Systems Preparedness and Response Plan Rev. 10 – June 2013 Prepared by: Washington State Department of Health and Washington State Hospital Association. Page 53 of 94 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 8, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 5/14/18 FROM: Rick Terway, Interim Director Public Works SUBJECT: Professional Service Agreement with Meier Architecture Engineering for the Animal Control Facility I. REFERENCE(S): Professional Service Agreement Summary Vicinity Map II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Fund 193 Capital Improvement - REET 2: $82,598.33 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In 2001, the City of Pasco purchased the old Humane Society building complex. The complex was built in phases with the first building built in 1970 and the last built in 1975. The complex was then leased to the Animal Control Authority which consists of the three cities of Richland, Kennewick and Pasco, each city paying an equal share. The complex has been since paid off. the current facility is in dire need of replacement and has been for several years. A study to replace the current animal shelter was completed in 2008. Rough estimates at that time, were completed to design a new shelter that would be approximately 15,000 to 18,000 square feet. In 2015, Consultant, Anne Pflug, completed an updated study regarding the replacement of the animal shelter. The scope of the white paper completed by Ms. Pflug included the following: 1.Locate the best location within the Tri-Cities for a shelter. 2.Evaluate the current programs offered by the contractor. 3.Suggest a funding mechanism for a fair split between the three cities. Page 54 of 94 4.Recommend a path moving forward for maintenance and operation of the facility. It was determined that of the sights studied in each city, the best location would be to have the current sight remain due to the familiarity to the tri-cities and the central location. Evaluation of programs, funding split for maintenance and operations is in a 5 year evaluation period in order to track various data. A new Interlocal Cooperative Agreement between the three cities for design and construction of the Animal Control Facility was approved by all parties in December of 2016. A request for qualifications was completed mid-2017. Meier Architecture in conjunction with Animal Shelter Planners of America were selected to complete the feasibility study to determine size and rough design of the building. The study reduced the building to the recommended size and scope from the original 15,000 to 8,000 square feet to meet the current and forecasted needs of the Animal Control Authority. The design also includes the ability to expand the building if required. V. DISCUSSION: In accordance with the Interlocal Agreement, design and construction services for the Animal Control Facility has been approved by our partner agencies. This contract will complete final design of the facility and develop plans and specifications for biddi ng purposes. Staff recommends approval of the Professional Services Agreement with Meier Architecture Engineering for the sum of $247,795. Each City will responsible for a third of the total amount or $82,598.33 each. Page 55 of 94 Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: Professional Services Agreement for Design of the Animal Control Facility Consultant: Meier Architecture Engineering Address: 12 W Kennewick Avenue, Kennewick, WA 99336 Scope of Services: Design and construction management of Animal Control Facility Term: Completion Date: March 2020 Payments to Consultant: ☒ Hourly Rate: $ not to exceed $247,795 ☐ Fixed Sum of: ☐ Other: Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: ☐ $1,000,000 each occurrence; ☐ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or ☒ $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: ☒ $1,000,000 per claim; ☐ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or ☐ $________ per claim; and $________ per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Pasco’s share of the Agreement is $82,598.33________________________ Signature by: ☐ Mayor ☒ City Manager Page 56 of 94 ANIMA L S HELT ER SY LV E S TER STUS 39520 TH AVELEWIS ST Page 57 of 94 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 10, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 5/14/18 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: PSD 2018 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report I. REFERENCE(S): School District letter of transmittal 2018 Capital Facilities Plan update II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In January of 2011 the Pasco School District (PSD) informed City Council that there was no longer the capacity to accommodate increased student enrollment due do residential growth in the community. The District requested both the City and County consider including the District’s Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) within their respective Comprehensive Plans and adopt a school impact fee. Council incorporated the District’s Capital Facilities Plan in the City’s Comprehensive Plan in February of 2012 and in March of 2012 adopted Ordinance 4046 (establishing school impact fees). An Interlocal Agreement for implementation and processing of those fees was also approved by both the District and the City. The current impact fees established by Council through Ordinance 4046 are $4,700 (of this amount $17 is retained by the City for offsetting administrative costs) per single family unit and $4,525 per multi-family unit. One of the stipulations of the Interlocal Agreement is that the District provide a report to the City on the impact fees including the source and amount of all monies received and the public improvements that were financed in whole or in part by the fees. This Page 58 of 94 report is prepared each year by the PSD. The terms of the Interlocal Agreement also require the City to review and consider biennial updates of the District’s CFP and if appropriate, incorporate the updated CFP into our own capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. The last update under the Interlocal Agreement occurred in 2016. V. DISCUSSION: The District’s updated CFP contains a revised inventory of capital facilities - recognizing the expansion of capacity as a result of the 2017 bond election, subsequent new elementary and middle school construction and reconfiguration of the classes attending middle schools. The updated CFP also includes revised enrollment figures by MGT of America. Forecast enrollment figures for the next 6 years show that the District will increase a total (K through Grade 12) of approximately 3000 students. The 2018 District CFP Update and impact fee calculation contains revised new facility costs per dwelling unit based on the forecast student growth, the facilities that are needed to serve that growth and the estimated costs for those facilities. The newly calculated impact fee amounts (based on the accepted state-wide formula used in Ordinance 4046 adopted in 2012) for single family dwellings is $5,770 and for multi - family dwellings is $6,135. The District is not requesting an increase or change in the amount of the established school impact fees of $4,700 per single family unit and $4,525 per multi-family unit at this time. The District will be available at the Workshop meeting to provide a summary presentation and answer Council questions. If Council is in concurrence with incorporating the District's CFP update and leaving school impact fees at existing levels, a resolution will be prepared for formal consideration. Page 59 of 94 Pasco School District #1 C. L. Booth Education Service Center 1215 W. Lewis Street • Pasco, Washington 99301 Board of Directors • (509) 546-2801 • FAX (509) 543-6781 Equal Opportunity Employer May 10, 2018 Mayor and Members of the Pasco City Council 525 North 3rd Ave Pasco, WA 99301 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: On behalf of the Pasco School District Board of Directors, I am writing to thank you for your ongoing support of Pasco Public Schools, through among other things, the adoption and implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance (Ordinance 4046). As required by the Ordinance, the District has updated its Capital Facilities Plan. We are submitting the enclosed 2018 Update of the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan with a request that you continue to collect school impact fees in the amount that was adopted in 2012. Going forward, enrollment in the District is expected to continue to increase, with the majority of the growth occurring in grades K-6. As reflected in the enclosed CFP Update, the District will serve the forecast growth by completing the 2017 bond projects to construct new schools, adjust portable classroom locations, and make improvements to Support Services to meet capacity demands. The estimated cost for these improvements is over $150,000,000. The District will pay for the improvements with bond proceeds, state construction fund dollars and impact fees, as reflected in the finance plan in the CFP Update. We understand that the imposition of school impact fees may be unpopular with some of the people or organizations we are all elected to represent. At the same time, continued collection of school impact fees is necessary to provide school facilities for students living in new housing. The entire community benefits when we have quality schools, and the District relies on impact fees to help provide those schools. We appreciate our collaboration with the City through adoption and implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance. We will renew our request to have a similar ordinance adopted in Franklin County and until such time as the County adopts a school impact fee ordinance, we will continue to request that every new residential development in the County mitigate impacts on schools. Page 60 of 94 Celebrating academics, diversity and innovation. If you have any questions regarding the District’s 2018 CFP Update, or our request and need for school impact fees, please contact Superintendent Whitney at 509.546.2800. Sincerely, Steven Christensen, President Board of Directors Pasco School District No. 1 cc: Michelle Whitney, Superintendent Dave Zabell, City Manager Page 61 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 1 of 23 May 2018 PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 2018 UPDATE TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BOARD OF DIRECTORS Steve Christensen, President Amy Phillips, Vice President Sherry Lancon, Member Scott Lehrman, Member Aaron Richardson, Member SUPERINTENDENT Michelle Whitney Adopted. by the Pasco School Board on May 8, 2018 Page 62 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 2 of 23 May 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Introduction……………………………….....3 Section 2 Program Standards…………………………6 Section 3 Capital Facilities Inventory………………..8 Section 4 Enrollment Projections & Capacity…….10 Section 6 Financing Plan……………………………..12 Section 7 School Impact or Mitigation Fees………13 Appendices Appendix A—Charts & Supporting Data……….15 Building Capacity………………………….16 Building Condition Scores……………….17 Projected Enrollments…………………….18 Needed Capacity…………………………...19 Necessary Improvements & Costs……..20 Capital Facilities Financing Plan………..21 Appendix B—Impact Fee Calculations…………22 2018 Impact Fee……………………………23 Page 63 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 3 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the 2018 Update to the Capital Facilities Plan The Pasco School District (the “District”) in 2011 first adopted a Capital Facilities Plan (the “2011 CFP”) in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act, Chapter 36.70A RCW (the “GMA”), and City of Pasco Ordinance 4046 (the “School Impact Fee Ordinance”). The City of Pasco adopted the 2011 CFP on April 16, 2012, and adopted updates to the CFP in 2014 and 2016. Section 3.133.025 of the School Impact Fee Ordinance describes the elements that must be addressed in the CFP. They include “the District’s standard of service, an inventory of facilities, capacity by grade span, a six year enrollment forecast, facility needs and costs, a f inance plan and calculation of the school impact fees.” Once the CFP with these elements is adopted, the Ordinance says “[t]he District shall file an update to its capital facility plan at least once every two years.” And, “[a]t lease once every two years, commencing on April 15, 2014, the City Council shall review and consider the District submitted capital facilities plan update.” This 2018 Update is submitted to comply with the above requirements in the School Impact Fee Ordinance. The Update supplements and updates the core information in the 2011 CFP. The 2018 update also includes an updated calculation for the District’s school impact fees. B. Changes in the Pasco School District The District now serves 18,101 students (OSPI Form 1049, October 1, 2017), an increase of 2,111 students since 2012. Steady residential development within the district’s boundaries continues. The latest demographics study (MGT of America, 2017, Chart 3 herein) projects that residential growth will continue at a moderate rate over the six-year planning period and beyond. Since 2012, the City of Pasco has approved the construction of 1,925 single family units and 233 multi-family units (through March 2018). To construct all the improvements that are required to serve existing needs (including those from recent residential growth) and forecasted growth, the District asked its voters in November 2017 to approve a $99.5 million bond measure. The District’s voters passed the 2017 bond with a 60.07% yes vote (approval of a bond requires 60% yes votes). Previously, the last bond to pass was November 2013. This bond was developed with several strategies to significantly reduce the cost of the bond projects after the previous bond failed with a 48% yes vote in April 2011. The most significant measure was to reconfigure grade level groupings to delay the construction of a more expensive per-pupil middle school. District facilities planning to provide capacity to serve students has since been based upon this and other measures taken after the April 2011 bond election failure. • A community task force was engaged to provide recommendations to the board of directors regarding strategies for handling enrollment growth. The task force considered multi-track/year-round options, and recommended another less expensive bond be submitted to voters as soon as possible. • Based on the task force recommendations, the next bond in February 2013 was developed with the direction that an additional elementary school would be built Page 64 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 4 of 23 May 2018 because it was less expensive than a middle school, and the District would use the additional elementary capacity to house 6th grade students at the elementary level instead of the middle level. • The three elementary schools approved in the 2013 bond opened in the 2014-2015 school year (one school) and the 2015-2016 school year (two schools). The added capacity allowed the District to complete the plan to transition to a K-6 and 7-8 grade configuration in 2015-2016. The November 2017 bond will fund additional capacity at the elementary level with two new schools and at the middle level with funding to construct Middle School #4 and replace and expand Stevens Middle School. In June 2017 the District’s Community Builders Group recommended these projects for the bond, with the understanding that the additional middle level capacity would cause the district to transition 6th grade back to the middle school. The District has continued to engage in cost-saving measures in facilities planning, and will continue to use cost-reduction strategies and District construction standards to save taxpayer dollars. Pasco School District’s construction costs have normally been lower than other school construction costs around the State of Washington. Examples of cost- reduction strategies includes the following: • Use property already owned by the district for school sites; • Use the updated Pasco design that has been built multiple times for Pasco schools, thereby saving A/E, construction and maintenance costs; • Curie and Whittier Elementary Schools share one playground, reducing the amount of land to be purchased; • Build larger elementary schools to reduce the total number needed and create efficiencies in operations; • Build schools to serve at least 50 years; • Maintain school buildings well to ensure they last several decades; and • Since middle school student enrollment was reduced in 2015 by keeping 6th grade at the elementary school, and elementary enrollments increased, unused portable classrooms on middle school campuses have been moved to provide temporary capacity at the elementary level. The voters of Washington state passed Initiative 1351 in 2014. The initiative imposes class size values as recommended by the and the Legislature’s Quality Education Council (QEC). The class size requirements have been implemented in part and delayed in part. Under the Supreme Court’s McCleary decision, the Legislature is under court order to fully fund basic K- 12 education, including the K-3 class size reductions. Initiative 1351 class sizes are reflected in Chart 1 and position the District for full legislative implementation. The District implemented All-Day Kindergarten (ADK) in every elementary school in the 2015- 2016 school year. The District added portable classrooms to meet this requirement. In Chart 2 in the Appendix, State scoring matrices show that Pasco School District is effectively maintaining its schools as a community investment and asset, according to a third Page 65 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 5 of 23 May 2018 party review. The schools’ adjusted maintenance score is significantly above its expected score for the facility’s age, demonstrating effective maintenance by the district. These data mean that they will last longer and be able to serve more students before needing to be replaced. Page 66 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 6 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 2 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARDS The District’s core and special program needs, which are used to define the standard of service, are addressed in the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan. The District has implemented K-3 class size reduction and All Day Kindergarten and is positioned to implement I-1351’s targets for grades 4-12 . Below is the District’s adopted educational program standards (or standard of service). A. Elementary Educational Program Standards The state is required to provide funding for a student-to-teacher ratio of 17-1 in grades K-3 (15-1 for high poverty schools), consistent with QEC recommendations, Initiative 1351, and McCleary. The class size of 15 will impact eleven elementary schools which qualify as high poverty. The remaining four elementary schools will be impacted by the class size of 17. Elementary Class Size Requirements-Initiative 1351 Grades K-3 Enacted by the Legislature Grades 4-12 Implementation Delayed Grade Levels Initiative 1351 Class Sizes District Contract Class Sizes High-Poverty Schools Non-High Poverty Schools 2017 K-1 15 17 24 2-3 15 17 27 4-6 25 28 4 22 5-6 23 Capt. Gray Markham Whittier McClintock Robinson Livingston Longfellow Angelou Chess Emerson Frost Twain Curie Franklin McGee B. Middle and High School Program Standards Secondary (Middle and High) school class size standards also are projected to be reduced to levels set by Initiative 1351 with recommendations to be mandated under McCleary as noted below. Page 67 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 7 of 23 May 2018 Secondary Class Size Requirements-Initiative 1351 Grades K-3 Enacted by the Legislature Grades 4-12 Implementation Delayed Grade Levels Initiative 1351 Class Size District Contract Class Size High-Poverty Schools Non-High Poverty Schools 2017 7-8 23 25 *30 9-12 23 25 *30 *Max Stevens MS 155/day Ochoa MS McLoughlin MS Pasco HS Chiawana HS New Horizons HS Page 68 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 8 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 3 CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY As described in the 2011-2017 CFP, the District’s facilities inventory establishes a baseline for determining the facilities necessary to accommodate future demand (student enrollment) at acceptable levels of service. Three schools have been added since the 2014 update to the CFP, resulting in an increase to the permanent capacity calculation. Elementary schools and middle schools will be added through 2023. The District will also move portables between schools and grade levels as additional capacity is needed. A. Capacity Calculation and Standard of Service The District’s Board of Directors directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of school building capacity in 2017. The purpose of the review was to ensure consistent, reasonable measures were being used to determine the capacity of each school building, and to provide a safe and equitable standard of service for students throughout the school system. Student safety has been a critical consideration for the District in determining this standard of service. In 2014 and again in 2018, the District conducted a comprehensive safety review of schools, including brick and mortar buildings and portable classrooms. It is the District’s goal to house students in permanent facilities with controlled points of access, which can be best accomplished by housing students in one contained brick and mortar building. Portable classrooms will continue to be used as a temporary solution to provide student housing. However, to achieve the desired standard of service to enhance student and staff safety, portable classrooms should not be counted in the District’s permanent classroom inventory. The state does not count portable classrooms when calculating a school district’s classroom inventory for purposes of eligibility for state assistance for construction. In the 2011-2017 CFP, the District counted some portables into the permanent capacity calculation after consultation with the City of Pasco. Based on the above considerations, however, the 2017 CFP update does not include portable classrooms in calculating permanent capacity but still recognizes the capacity purpose. B. Elementary Schools The District currently has fifteen (15) elementary schools. Thirteen (13) of these schools serve grades K-6, one (1) serves grades K-2, and one (1) serves grades 3-6. The fifteen (15) elementary schools provide capacity to serve 7,167 students in permanent capacity. As of October 1, 2017, there were 10,164 elementary students enrolled. There are 139 portable classrooms at the elementary schools providing additional capacity to house 2,489 students. Since 2014, the District has added 33 new portable classrooms as temporary capacity. This includes the modification of septic and water service at Markham elementary to allow expansion through the addition of portables which was completed in 2015. Two new elementary schools, providing additional capacity for 1,240 elementary students, will be constructed by 2023. The District purchased the former Pasco Senior Center and an adjacent vacant lot from the City in 2016 for the purpose of the converting the building into an early learning facility. The District Page 69 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 9 of 23 May 2018 pursued, and was granted, two capital appropriations from the state totaling $1.3 million dollars to help offset the costs. The Early Learning Center opened in January 2018, with designated programs transitioned to the Center by September 2018. In addition, the District has leased the former Kids World daycare facility on North 20th Avenue in Pasco to provide additional classrooms for early learning. These projects have allowed the District to provide additional capacity for K-6 students in elementary buildings by relocating early learning classes from the elementary buildings to the new facilities. C. Middle Schools The District has three middle schools serving grades 7-8. The middle schools provide permanent capacity to serve approximately 2,457 students. As of October 1, 2017, there were 2,693 students enrolled in those schools. There are 46 portable classrooms at the middle schools providing additional capacity to house 874 students. Since 2011, the District added sixteen (16) new portable classrooms as temporary capacity at the middle school level. Middle School #4 and the replacement and expansion of Stevens Middle School will add permanent capacity for approximately 995 students by 2023. The District also plans to add portable capacity at the middle school level during the six years of this CFP (either newly purchased or relocated from the elementary grade level). D. High Schools As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP, there are two traditional high schools serving grades 9-12. There is permanent capacity to serve 3,716 students in the high schools. As of October 1, 2017 there were 5,225 students enrolled. Pasco High School has additional capacity to serve students in (25) portable classrooms and Chiawana High School has additional capacity to serves students in 16 portable classrooms added to the campus in 2017. New Horizons High School moved into a leased brick and mortar building on the Columbia Basin College campus in 2017. The building capacity is 206. E. Support Facilities Bus parking has been expanded into the District’s maintenance lay-down yard at the Port of Pasco property (Building 210). The District leased additional space from the Port to replace the lost lay-down yard capacity, and is also leasing additional warehouse space. The November 2017 bond will provide funding for expansion of transportation and maintenance facilities. F. Land Inventory The District currently owns nine unimproved parcels, totaling approximately 146 acres. Two sites will be the location of schools from the 2017 bond, bringing the District’s total available unimproved property to 82 acres. The District plans to acquire additional property for future schools. Page 70 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 10 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 4 STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS AND CAPACITY BY GRADE SPAN A. Projected Student Enrollment Since 2016, the District received and reviewed four enrollment forecasts. For purposes of the 2018 CFP Update, the District is relying on the comprehensive forecast provided by MGT of America. See Appendix, Chart 3. In October 2011, there were 15,707 students enrolled in grades K-12. In October 2017, there were 18,101 students enrolled, which is an increase of 2,394 students. By 2023, the forecast predicts there will be 21,170 students enrolled in grades K-12, which is an additional 3,069 students over 2017. The District will need to add permanent and temporary capacity at the elementary and secondary levels to serve the growth. B. Capacity by Grade Span Current enrollment at each grade level is identified in Chart 1 , which provides the actual enrollment in District facilities as of October 1, 2017. Projected available student capacity was derived by subtracting projected student 2023 enrollment (Chart 3 ) from total existing October 2017 school capacity (Chart 1 ). Enrollment in grades K-8 is expected to grow by approximately 1,969 students by 2023. At the same time, class size standards have been reduced by the state, and further implementation of reduced class sizes is expected. Based on the forecast enrollment increase, and without considering planned projects (which will add a total of 2,235 new permanent K-8 seats), the District will need to add capacity at the K-8 level for 1,859 students. Enrollment in grades 9-12 is currently 5,225. High school enrollment is forecasted for continued growth, adding more than 1,100 students by 2023. The District has added capacity for additional students at New Horizons and Pasco High School. However, the District will need to add capacity for 1,839 students at the high school level. The current capacity in the existing schools and the capacity that is needed to serve forecast growth through 2023 was revised based on class size reduction targets and construction projects completed through the date of this CFP. Please see Chart 4 in the Appendix. Chart 4 does not consider capacity additions planned through 2023 and beyond. Page 71 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 11 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS To determine future facility needs, existing school program capacity was compared to projected enrollment throughout the six-year forecast period. See Section 4. In November 2017, the District’s voters passed a $99.5 million bond measure to help fund the construction of two new elementary schools, a new middle school, the expansion and replacement of Stevens Middle School, safety and health improvements at various schools, and improvements to the District’s transportation and maintenance facilities. See Chart 5, Appendix. The District expects that all of the new capacity projects will be complete no later than the 2023-24 school year. Portable classrooms will be used to provide temporary facilities while funding is secured to construct brick and mortar facilities. The new schools and portable classrooms will provide the needed capacity identified in Section 4 above. In addition to building schools that add capacity for growth, the District will make other improvements to serve students. The improvements will be constructed in phases and cannot occur until bonds are approved by the voters. The District will continue with long term facilities planning efforts using community recommendations to identify which projects should be prioritized. The District will continue to plan for needs beyond 2023. Chart 5 includes estimated permanent improvements and capacity conditioned on future funding. Future updates to this CFP will provide more specific information as to the District’s updated planning beyond the 2017 Bond projects. Page 72 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 12 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 6 CAPITAL FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN The District's ability to fund the planned improvements that will add capacity is dependent upon the passage of bond elections at a 60% supermajority and receipt of State Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds, also known as “state match” funds. Costs for improvements that add capacity are used to calculate school impact fees. School impact fees, or SEPA mitigation fees collected from some new development projects in unincorporated Franklin County, will be used to pay for a portion of the improvements that add capacity. The majority of the costs to construct the capacity improvements will be paid for with bonds and state match funds. See Section 6 of the 2011 CFP for a complete discussion regarding the framework for financing planned improvements. The District was not awarded a K-3 class size reduction grant as referenced in the 2016 update to the Capital Facilities Plan. Therefore, to serve growth and address class size reduction, the District plans to construct new schools and expand additional schools consistent with the funding identified in this CFP. In addition to construction of facilities to add capacity, the District also needs to acquire school sites for future construction, and must make a variety of improvements that are needed at existing facilities. A key Community Builders Group recommendation was to address capital facilities needs related to safety and health. The Capital Facilities Financing Plan in Chart 6 demonstrates how the District intends to fund new construction and improvements to school facilities during the six-year planning period. Page 73 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 13 of 23 May 2018 SECTION 7 SCHOOL IMPACT OR MITIGATION FEES The District’s ability to fund the improvements that are needed to serve forecast growth depends on new development contributing to the cost to build the schools that will serve the students that live in new housing. The District is collecting school impact fees from development in the City and will continue to request mitigation fees from developers in Franklin County (and continue to request that Franklin County adopt a GMA-based school impact fee ordinance). The District files annual reports with the City regarding the use of the school impact fees. The District has calculated school impact fees using a standard school impact fee formula, adopted by the City of Pasco and many other Washington cities and counties, that complies with the Growth Management Act. The resulting figures are based on the District’s cost per dwelling unit to construct schools needed to serve new development. A student factor (or student generation rate) is used to identify the average cost per dwelling unit by measuring the average number of students generated by each housing type (single-family dwellings and multi- family dwellings). The District hires a consultant to update the student factor methodology based upon the last six years of residential development data within the District , as required by t he City of Pasco School Impact Fee Ordina nce. As required under the GMA, credits are applied in the formula to account for State School Construction Assistance funds to be reimbursed to the District and projected future property taxes to be paid by the dwelling unit. The costs of projects that do not add capacity are not included in the impact fee calculations. Furthermore, impact fees will not be used to address existing deficiencies. The following projects are included in the impact fee calculation: • New Elementary School (based on the average cost of Elementary 16 and 17); and • New Middle School. Please see Chart 6. Elementary #16, Elementary #17, Middle School #4, and the expanded capacity at Stevens Middle School are eligible for impact fee funding as growth related projects. The calculated impact fee amounts (reduced by 25%), in Appendix B, are $5,770 for each single family residence and $6,135 for each multi-family residence. However, the District is requesting the City continue collecting the current amounts which are: Single Family: $4,700 Multi Family: $4,525 The District began receiving impact fees from the City in 2012. Through December 2017, the District has received approximately $9,426,689 in impact fee revenue. Of that amount, $1,250,000 was used to reduce the principal of the 2013 bond, $2,208,772 was used to pay for a portion of the 2015-2016 portable classrooms, and $1,164,955 was spent to acquire land in 2017. The District plans to use remaining revenue for portables to accommodate enrollment, land acquisition, and reducing the cost of the 2017 Bond projects. The District will use future impact fees as allowed by law for growth-related impacts identified in the CFP. Page 74 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 14 of 23 May 2018 CONCLUSION The District continues to use a variety of strategies to plan, reduce costs, and mitigate the effects of student enrollment growth. Receipt of impact fees remains critical to ensuring the District can manage growth by providing sufficient student facilities. The forecast of steady enrollment growth over the next six years underscores the need to use a variety of financing measures, including the passage of bonds, expenditure from the General Fund, and impact fees/SEPA mitigation fees to meet the needs of the community. Page 75 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 15 of 23 May 2018 APPENDIX A Charts with Supporting Data Page 76 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 16 of 23 May 8, 2018 Chart 1 Building Capacity October 1, 2017 *Building Capacity is the number of classrooms multiplied by the weighted average I-1351 class size for non-high poverty schools, multiplied by a utilization factor to allow for planning time and other uses. Elementary Schools Grades Served Building Classrooms Building Capacity Temp Portable Classrooms Temp Portable Capacity Total Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017 Enrollment Gray K-6 25 449 10 180 35 629 551 Markham K-6 14 251 10 180 24 431 397 McGee K-6 22 388 14 251 36 639 666 Twain K-6 27 463 15 262 42 725 755 Angelou K-6 32 567 12 215 44 782 898 Livingston K-6 22 395 17 305 39 700 780 Whittier K-2 26 452 12 215 38 667 606 Robinson K-6 33 578 12 215 45 793 773 Emerson K-6 26 452 7 126 33 578 690 Longfellow K-6 24 416 4 72 28 488 466 Frost K-6 26 445 9 162 35 607 650 Chess K-6 27 477 9 162 36 639 533 Franklin K-6 35 614 6 108 41 722 804 McClintock K-6 34 596 2 36 36 632 754 Curie 3-6 36 624 0 0 36 624 841 Totals 409 7,167 139 2,489 548 9,656 10,164 Middle Schools Grades Served Building Classrooms Building Capacity Temp Portable Classrooms Temp Portable Capacity Total Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017 Enrollment McLoughlin 7-8 46 863 28 532 74 1,395 1,285 Stevens 7-8 38 740 12 228 50 968 708 Ochoa 7-8 44 854 6 114 50 968 700 Totals 128 2,457 46 874 174 3,331 2,693 High Schools Grades Served Building Classrooms Building Capacity Temp Portable Classrooms Temp Portable Capacity Total Classrooms Total Capacity Oct 1, 2017 Enrollment Chiawana 9-12 109 1,984 16 300 125 2,284 2,717 Pasco 9-12 82 1,526 25 469 107 1,995 2,239 New Horizons 9-12 11 206 0 0 11 206 269 Totals 202 3,716 41 769 243 4,485 5,225 District Total 739 13,340 226 4,132 965 17,472 18,082 Page 77 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 17 of 23 May 2018 Chart 2 Pasco School District Asset Preservation Program 2017 Building Condition Scores OSPI 2015 2016 2017 Building Age in Years Current Draft Score by Age Adjusted B.C.E. Adjusted B.C.E. Adjusted B.C.E. Emerson 21 74 87.94 86.96 85.69 Frost 21 74 86.44 84.09 82.98 Franklin 4 95 100 100 99.06 McClintock 3 97 NA 98.52 97.69 Curie 3 97 NA 100 99.90 Chiawana High School 9 90 95.30 95.30 94.49 Delta High School 3 97 NA 95.56 96.10 “B.C.E.” is the Building Condition Evaluation score given by OSPI for those facilities in which State School Construction Assistance Program (state match) dollars were used. The Current Draft Score” is OSPI’s expected score for the age of the facility, given average use and maintenance. Pasco High School is no longer assigned a B.C.E. score for purposes of state reporting because of the age of the facility. However, the district continues to monitor and score Pasco High School for internal monitoring purposes. Page 78 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 18 of 23 May 2018 Chart 3 MGT of America Projected Enrollments Grade 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 K 1,455 1,480 1,491 1,530 1,520 1,528 1,521 1,539 1,552 1,558 1 1,475 1,519 1,502 1,585 1,617 1,646 1,664 1,682 1,693 1,726 2 1,465 1,437 1,463 1,581 1,644 1,674 1,694 1,703 1,736 1,754 3 1,424 1,449 1,458 1,579 1,616 1,656 1,668 1,689 1,701 1,731 4 1,526 1,524 1,587 1,687 1,741 1,781 1,809 1,820 1,847 1,869 5 1,547 1,568 1,565 1,709 1,748 1,782 1,810 1,837 1,856 1,880 6 1,484 1,506 1,538 1,565 1,674 1,716 1,713 1,774 1,792 1,822 7 1,443 1,524 1,491 1,540 1,515 1,574 1,600 1,620 1,672 1,715 8 1,298 1,299 1,436 1,415 1,469 1,489 1,516 1,557 1,596 1,619 9 1,430 1,520 1,498 1,581 1,613 1,484 1,455 1,492 1,478 1,555 10 1,332 1,316 1,458 1,509 1,513 1,526 1,536 1,512 1,574 1,618 11 1,304 1,426 1,430 1,441 1,526 1,608 1,631 1,681 1,718 1,783 12 1,297 1,286 1,411 1,474 1,592 1,707 1,762 1,790 1,819 1,824 TOTAL 18,479 18,854 19,328 20,195 20,788 21,170 21,380 21,697 22,034 22,454 Page 79 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 19 of 23 May 2018 Chart 4 2023 Student Capacity and Future Need Building Capacity 2017 Total Capacity (Permanent/Portable) 2017 Forecast Enrollment 2023 Needed Capacity 2023 Elementary (K-5) 7,167 9,656 10,066 410 Middle (6-8) 2,457 3,331 4,780 1,449 High (9-12) 3,638 4,485 6,324 1,839 “Building Capacity” is the number of classrooms multiplied by the weighted average I-1351 class size for non-high poverty schools, multiplied by a utilization factor to allow for planning time and other uses. “Forecast Enrollment 2023” is based on the enrollment forecast provided by MGT of America. “Needed Capacity” does not include new capacity planned for completion through 2023 or portable additions/relocations. Page 80 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 20 of 23 May 2018 Chart 5 Necessary Facility Improvements, Added Capacity and Costs 2018 Update 2017 BOND PROJECT ESTIMATES New Elementary School #16 620 $27,300,000 New Elementary School #17 620 $28,500,000 Stevens Middle School Replacement and Expansion 75 $42,700,000 New Middle School #4 920 $46,500,000 Land Acquisition 0 $2,000,000 Support Services Capital Improvements 0 $3,000,000 Health and Safety Capital Improvements 0 $1,700,000 Total 2017 Bond Project Estimates 2,235 $151,700,000 ESTIMATED PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS & CAPACITY CONDITIONED ON FUTURE BOND AND STATE ASSISTANCE New High School #3 1,800 $135,000,000 New Innovative High School TBD $38,000,000 Replace Livingston Elem. 200 $34,000,000 Replace McGee Elem. 200 $35,300,000 New Elementary School #18 600 $38,900,000 New Middle School #5 900 $56,800,000 Curie ES Expansion 80 $1,800,000 Land Acquisition (160 acres) 0 $12,160,000 Total Permanent Capacity 4,380 $351,960,000 TEMPORARY CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000 Total 460 $3,250,000 TOTALS 7,075 $506,910,000 Page 81 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix A Page 21 of 23 May 2018 Chart 6 Capital Facilities Financing Plan Project Estimates “State Match” refers to funds allocated by the State of Washington through the School Construction Assistance Program administered by OSPI. This number is an estimate of state matching funds and is subject to verification by OSPI. *The cost of bonds being used to finance the replacement of Stevens Middle School includes $3 million held over from 2013 bond which had been designated for Stevens Middle School Improvements. *The “portion TBD” of impact fee revenue used to fund the growth-related capacity projects included in the 2017 Bond Projects will be determined based upon impact fee revenue received from new development. Impact fee revenue may be able to offset debt service on the bonds and result in tax savings to the existing community. In particular, the District plans to use at least $2 million in school impact fees to reduce the cost of the 2017 Bond projects. These estimates will be adjusted accordingly in future updates to this CFP. Project Added Capacity Est. Cost Source of Funding Bonds State Match Impact/ Mitigation Fees General Fund Approved November 2017 Bond Projects and Other Improvements Elementary #16 620 $27,300,000 $18,700,000 $8,600,000 Portion TBD Elementary #17 620 $28,500,000 $19,900,000 $8,600,000 Portion TBD Stevens Middle School Replacement 75 $42,700,000 $24,100,000* $18,600,000 Portion TBD Middle School #4 920 $46,500,000 $37,800,000 $8,700,000 Portion TBD Safety & Health Improvements $1,700,000 $1,700,000 Transportation & Maintenance Improvements $3,000,000 $3,000,000 Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000 Portion TBD Land Acquisition $2,000,000 $2,000,000 Portion TBD Future Bond Projects (Subject to Future Planning & Board Approval) New High School #3 1,800 $135,000,000 $80,000,000 $50,000,000 Portion TBD New Innovative High School TBD $38,000,000 $23,900,000 $14,100,000 Replace Livingston Elem. 200 $34,000,000 $13,600,000 $20,400,000 Portion TBD Replace McGee Elem. 200 $35,300,000 $14,100,000 $21,200,000 Portion TBD Parent Partnership Program TBD $5,000,000 $5,000,000 Portion TBD New Elementary School #18 600 $38,900,000 $38,900,000 Portion TBD New Middle School #5 900 $56,800,000 $56,800,000 Portion TBD Curie ES Expansion 80 $1,800,000 1,800,000 Portion TBD Land Acquisition NA $12,160,000 Portion TBD Portable Classrooms 460 $3,250,000 Portion TBD Page 82 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix B, Page 22 of 23 May 2018 APPENDIX B IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Page 83 of 94 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Appendix B, Page 23 of 23 May 2018 Page 84 of 94 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 11, 2018 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 5/14/18 FROM: Bob Metzger, Police Chief Police Department SUBJECT: Use of Personal Fireworks I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance PMC Chapter 16.40 Fire Prevention Code Washington State Legal Consumer Fireworks List II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In 1996, the City of Pasco, along with Franklin County and the City of Kennewick, passed ordinances prohibiting the use of personal fireworks. This ordinance was passed as a result of a significant number of structural and wildland fires that occurred during the firework sale period beginning June 28 and ending July 5. Most of the fires were determined to have been caused by the discharge of illegal fireworks by citizens discharging personal fireworks. These fireworks frequently landed among flammable vegetation or on structural roofs. V. DISCUSSION: Staff has been discussing the option of allowing limited "Consumer Use Fireworks" to be sold and displayed within the City. The State of Washington specifically bans items that are considered dangerous as defined by the California State Fire Marshal's office. Adherence to the State of Washington guidelines would provide for a "safe and sane" (non-aerial) option and thus reduce the likelihood of the purchase of unsafe fireworks from outside the City for use within the City. Further, in that the allowed fireworks under the Washington State guidelines are non-aerial, enforcement would also be eased Page 85 of 94 as illegal fireworks would be much easier to spot by patrols. Ultimately, this matter comes down to a balance between the practicality in enforcement of the total ban, against the compromise of allowing for limited fireworks, as illustrated in the attachment and the impact of the two alternatives on safety. It is important to consider that a ban that has proven difficult, if not impossible, to enforce over the past two decades is not effective in making the community safe over the Fourth of July holiday. Limiting the number of possible violations would reduce those calls for service and allow the Police Department to effectively address serious fireworks violations that present a threat to our community. Based on prior council discussion, staff has reviewed the current ordinance with the City Attorney and is offering the following ordinance for your review and discussion. In brief, the ordinance follows state guidelines on allowable fireworks and also allows, if approved by Council, the selling of certain fireworks within the City limits. Staff is looking to Council for direction on the proposed ordinance. Page 86 of 94 ORDINANCE NO.__________ AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington Amending Section 16.40.050 “Substitution for Section 5608 of the IFC Fireworks”; Adopting Section 16.40.055 “Substitute for Section 5601.1.3 Fireworks”; Amending Section 16.40.060 “Amendment of Section 5608.2 Fireworks Permits, to the IFC”; Adopting Chapter 5.80 “Fireworks Sales” WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has found that fireworks when purchased and used in compliance with the laws of the State of Washington and according to the provisions and requirements of this ordinance, are legal; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has found that its current Pasco Municipal Code provisions banning the storage, sale, possession, or discharge of any fireworks shall be amended to allow under certain conditions the sale and discharge of fireworks that are not specifically banned, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 16.40.050 entitled “Substitution for Section 5608 of the IFC Fireworks” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 16.40.050 SUBSTITUTION FOR SECTION 5608 OF THE IFC – FIREWORKS DISPLAY. Section 5608.1 of the International Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 5608.1 FIREWORKS DISPLAY: The Fire Chief shall have the authority to adopt reasonable rules and regulations for the granting of permits for supervised public display of fireworks by the municipality, fair association, amusement parks, and other organizations. Every such display shall be handled by a competent operator approved by the Fire Chief. Every operator shall have first obtained a Washington State Pyrotechnic license pursuant to RCW 70.77.305 and WAC Chapter 212-17. The display shall be of such a character, and so located, discharged or fired as in the opinion of the Fire Chief after proper inspection, shall not be hazardous to property or endanger any person. Violation of this subsection shall constitute a civil infraction punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for each violation. Section 2. That Section 16.40.055 entitled “Substitute for Section 5601.1.3 Fireworks” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is adopted and shall read as follows: 16.40.055 SUBSTITUTION FOR SECTION 5601.1.3 OF THE IFC – FIREWORKS. Section 5601.1.3 of the International Fire Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 5601.1.3 FIREWORKS: Page 87 of 94 (1) The possession, manufacture, storage, sale, handling and use of fireworks within the City of Pasco shall be prohibited except as otherwise provided in this PMC 16.40. Any excepted activities shall be in accordance with the Washington State Fireworks Law, Chapter 70.77 RCW, and Chapter 212-17 WAC, unless otherwise provided in this section. (2) Exceptions: (a) Any person having the necessary licenses from the State of Washington may possess and store fireworks in the City of Pasco at an approved location properly zoned therefore, for the purpose of the distribution of such fireworks for retail sale outside the city limits. (b) The use of fireworks for fireworks displays as allowed in Section 5608. (c) Possession, storage, sale, handling, and use of specific consumer fireworks as provided for in this section shall be allowed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16.40 of the PMC. (3) The City Manager or his/her designee, after consulting with the fire chief, police chief, other officials and information as deemed appropriate, may prohibit the discharge of all fireworks during periods of extreme fire emergency. The City Manager or his/her designee shall consider relevant advisory notices from such organizations as Emergency Management Division Washington, Franklin County Emergency Management and regional declarations of emergency in making a decision to enact emergency restrictions on the discharge of fireworks. (4) Commercial sales of certain fireworks shall be allowed within City limits in certain zones and during specific dates of each year and also subject to other criteria as provided for in this chapter and in PMC 5.80 FIREWORKS SALES. (a) A permit issued by a City of Pasco fire official shall be required for all commercial sales of fireworks. Application for permits for commercial sales of fireworks shall be made in writing on the form provided by the City no later than May 10 for sales commencing on June 28 and on December 27; or no later than November 10 for sales commencing only on December 27, and shall be accompanied by a letter from the person legally responsible for the property on which such sale is to take place. Such letter shall grant permission to the applicant for the use of said property. Such permit shall not be transferrable. Upon receiving written application for a commercial fireworks sales permit, the fire official shall investigate the application and submit a report of findings and a recommendation for or against the issuance of the permit, together with reasons, to the City Council. Upon instruction from City Council, the fire official shall grant an application for a permit if the application meets the standards under Chapter 70.77 RCW, and all other the applicable ordinances of the Pasco Municipal Code. The permit shall be granted by June 10, or no less than thirty days after receipt of an application Fireworks Ordinance Page 2 Page 88 of 94 whichever date occurs first, for sales commencing on June 28 and on December 27; or by December 10, or no less than thirty days after receipt of an application whichever date occurs first, for sales commencing only on December 27. Applications for permits shall not be made nor permits issued to individuals under the age of 18 years old. No person under the age of 18 shall be employed by the permittee in connection with the retail sale of fireworks. (b) A City of Pasco business license shall be required for all commercial sales of fireworks and such license shall be issued pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 5.80 of the Pasco Municipal Code. (c) Commercial sales and purchases of specific fireworks as provided herein shall only be allowed within the City of Pasco from twelve o'clock noon to eleven o'clock p.m. on the twenty-eighth of June, from nine o'clock a.m. to eleven o'clock p.m. on each day from the twenty-ninth of June through the fourth of July, from nine o'clock a.m. to nine o'clock p.m. on the fifth of July, from twelve o'clock noon to eleven o'clock p.m. on each day from the twenty-seventh of December through the thirty-first of December of each year, and as provided in RCW 70.77.311. (d) Commercial sales of fireworks shall only be permitted in commercial zones within the City of Pasco. (e) Commercial sales of fireworks shall only take place in outdoor temporary tents or stands and shall be prohibited within physical buildings. Such stands or tents must comply with provisions of PMC Title 25. (f) Fireworks stands shall provide approved no smoking signs in red letters, not less than two inches in height, on a white background. All signs shall be maintained in a legible condition and shall be placed and displayed so as to be clearly visible and readable a minimum of 20 feet from the building or stand in which fireworks are sold at retail or stored after hours. (g) Each retail fireworks location shall have not less than two water-type extinguishers of not less than two and one-half-gallon capacity or the equivalent. (h) There shall be at least two exits from all booths from which fireworks are sold. The two exits shall be unobstructed and open from the ground level to at least six feet in height. (i) There shall be no accumulations of dry grass, paper, cardboard, trash, lumber or other combustibles within 100 feet of any retail fireworks outlet. (j) Fireworks are not to be sold within 100 feet of any flammable or combustible liquid or liquid petroleum gas dispenser. (k) The temporary structure or stand(s) used for the retail sale of fireworks shall be removed from the premises within one week after July 6th of each year. Any stand or structure remaining beyond one week may be removed by order of the City of Pasco Chief of Police at the expense of the permittee or owner. (l) The retail licensee shall distribute, with each sale of fireworks, safety literature as approved by the City of Pasco fire official. Fireworks Ordinance Page 3 Page 89 of 94 (m) It shall be unlawful for any person or corporation to sell or give fireworks to anyone under the age of 16 unless that person is under the immediate supervision of an adult (18 years old or older). It shall be unlawful for a parent, guardian or other person responsible for a child under the age of 16 to allow that child to possess, use, discharge or transport any fireworks unless that child is under the immediate supervision of an adult. It shall be unlawful for any person under the age of 16 to possess, use, discharge, or transport any fireworks unless under the immediate supervision of an adult (18 years old or older). (n) Signs shall be posted prominently at each firework sales outlet which state: “It is unlawful to sell or give fireworks to anyone under the age of sixteen (16) unless that person is under the immediate supervision of an adult (eighteen (18) years or older). It shall be unlawful for a parent, guardian or other person responsible for a child under the age of sixteen (16) to allow that child to possess, use, discharge or transport any fireworks unless that child is under the immediate supervision of an adult.” (o) Smoking and the discharge of fireworks shall be prohibited within 100 feet of any building or stand in which fireworks are sold at retail or stored after hours. (p) Notwithstanding RCW 70.77.575 and 70.77.580, every retailer in the City of Pasco is required to post prominently at each retail outlet a list of the fireworks that may be sold to the public under this section. The list is subject to approval by the fire code official and shall be submitted to the fire code official no later than May 31st of each year. (q) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess, store, sell or use in the City of Pasco any of the following: (i) Combination Items. Fireworks devices containing combinations of two or more of the effects described in WAC 212-17-198. (ii) “Special fireworks” as defined in RCW 70.77.131 and WAC 212-17- 040. Except with public display permits. (iii) “Agricultural and wildlife fireworks” as defined in RCW 70.77.141 and WAC 212-17-045. Except with proper permit. (iv) “Special effects” as defined in RCW 70.77.146. Except with proper permit. (v) Any fireworks devices which do not satisfy all the chemical content and construction requirements of WAC 212-17-050. (vi) Any fireworks larger, in terms of size or amount of pyrotechnic composition, than allowable as specified in RCW 70.77.136 as “consumer fireworks”. (vii) Any fireworks not listed as approved by the City’s fire code official for that given year. (5) Possession, handling, and storage of certain types of fireworks that are specified as those types allowed for commercial sale under this section is allowed at all Fireworks Ordinance Page 4 Page 90 of 94 times, provided that such fireworks are only kept for personal use and are not ignited within the City except as allowed under the provisions of this section. (6) Consumer fireworks, as determined may be used or discharged each day between the hours of twelve o'clock noon and eleven o'clock p.m. on the twenty-eighth of June and between the hours of nine o'clock a.m. and eleven o'clock p.m. on the twenty-ninth of June to the third of July, and on July 4th between the hours of nine o'clock a.m. and twelve o'clock midnight, and between the hours of nine o'clock a.m. and eleven o'clock p.m. on July 5th, and from six o'clock p.m. on December 31st until one o'clock a.m. on January 1st of the subsequent year, and as provided in RCW 70.77.311. (7) It is unlawful to use, fire or discharge any fireworks along the route of and during any parade or at any place of public assembly or in any commercial use district. (8) It is unlawful at any time to throw or toss any fireworks at any person, animal, vehicle or other thing or object. (9) It is unlawful to have in possession, use, fire or discharge any fireworks in any public park within the City of Pasco including vehicle parking areas within said parks. (10) Violation of this subsection shall constitute a civil infraction punishable by a civil penalty not to exceed two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) for each violation. Each day that violation continues after due notice has been served, shall be deemed a separate offense. (11) Any applicant who has been refused a permit for public display or a permit for retail sale of fireworks by the City of Pasco staff or official shall have the right to appeal said decision to the City of Pasco City Council within fourteen (14) days of denial. Section 3. That Section 16.40.060 entitled “Amendment of Section 5608.2 Fireworks Permits, to the IFC” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 16.40.100 AMENDMENT TO SECTION 109.4 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES OF THE IFC. Section 109.4 of the 2015 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Section 109.4 Violations – Penalties: Except for violations of PMC Section 16.40.55, any person, firm or corporation violating a provision of this chapter which is not also a violation of any other provisions of this Title or the codes adopted thereby, or shall fail to comply with the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair, or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or direction of the fire code official, or of a permit or certificate used under the provisions of this chapter, or operate or maintain an Fireworks Ordinance Page 5 Page 91 of 94 occupancy, premises, or vehicle subject to this chapter who allow a hazard to exist or fail to take immediate action to abate a hazard on such occupancy, premises, or vehicle when ordered to do so by the fire code official, shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. Each day that violation continues after due notice has been served, shall be deemed a separate offense. (Ord. 4296, 2016; Ord. 4108, 2013; Ord. 3964, 2010; Ord. 3670 Sec. 12, 2004; Ord. 3316 Sec. 14,1998.) Section 4. That Chapter 5.80 entitled “FIREWORKS SALES” of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is adopted and shall read as follows: FIREWORKS SALES 5.80.010 LICENSE REQUIRED. It shall be a violation of this code for any person to conduct, operate, sponsor or promote a retail or commercial fireworks sales business for the purpose of buying or selling fireworks without a license issued to him by the City pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. 5.80.020 PREMISES. No license shall be issued under this chapter unless the undertaking is to be in an outdoor tent or stand at a location that is otherwise licensed as a "business location" by the City under Chapter 5.04 of this code. 5.80.030 PERMIT FEE. The charge for the license under this chapter shall be as set forth in Chapter 3.07 of this code. 5.80.040 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE. Each applicant for a license shall file an application with the City Clerk. The application shall be in writing and signed by the applicant and shall give the applicants residence address and business address and such other information as shall be required by the City Clerk. Upon payment of the license fee, and satisfactory compliance with other applicable City Ordinances and general laws, the Clerk shall issue the license. 5.80.050 TERM OF LICENSE. The license shall terminate at 11:59:59 pm on December 31 of the same year it is granted. 5.80.060 POSTING - INSPECTION. The license shall be conspicuously posted at each location of an undertaking licensed under this chapter and shall be produced for inspection upon the request of any authorized city official or employee. 5.80.070 CODE INFRACTION - CIVIL PENALTY. Any person violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with any requirements of this chapter, upon a finding that the act or omission has been committed, shall be punished by a fine of not less than one hundred fifty dollars and not more than three hundred fifty dollars and shall be guilty of a code infraction. Each such person is guilty of a separate infraction for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of this chapter is committed, continued or permitted by such person and shall be punished as stated above. Fireworks Ordinance Page 6 Page 92 of 94 Section 5. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage, and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this ____ day of _________________, 2018. _____________________________ Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________________ ____________________________________ Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Fireworks Ordinance Page 7 Page 93 of 94 Celebrate safely WASHNGTON STATE F’.‘S LEGAL CONSUMER FIREWORKS campaign FOR SALE IN TENTS AND STANDS PER ROW 70.71136 Cylindrical Fountain Cone Fountain Smoke Devices 2.-......---:-°"....°":::.-~."-:-.....'---.--....°'°-..-::-.-'--1......-'-*'-=-=.....IL.m?f?II1 H nutty kg ‘IE Wheels ppnn-sauna:-ubnpu-1n nu-1-nu-uncut;A-an uqa-¢.n.upbn-an-uh.-nunW.j an-uruu--Inn--1.' -nu-.unsung Ground Spimets NoveltiesA--nnunnu-nu-sq:-nunuuu-no-nan--—-yauxvrupnuamnguu{ulna jnnnuluuxnumn?nnn:9:-um-‘nu-u.u-uqnmunuu up-mugs”mu":-nun:-Ilv?l-I IIIIII-I-ul-Itit L-In-ll-II--I XIII «-1-_-Id‘INN!‘ \. 5 'F§dIll5sDl!IIIl?l1Q?v!pIp&sl?l?ll$l§G?lu$Qi?llyII?wIyhIlTi!l¢\ FIREHH1'lE.'TI?B?£AU—HEV§'XNHSI)l ll ‘\ pnqasau rnzuuqsssasu “”'"'"" E-untrn-nus.-su.n.ns-nu;-an: ~...-I‘ Page 94 of 94