HomeMy WebLinkAboutBergerABAM - PSA Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchgs 14009L
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Feasibilify Traffic Study for Interchanges
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the city of Pasco, a washinglon
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter refened to as "City", and &9!g9,I$4, hereinafter
referred to as "Consultant."
RECITALS
WHEREAS,theCitydesirestohavecertainservicesand/ortasksperformed.assetforth
below requiring specialized ikillt, truining,
"quipment,
and other supportive capabilities; and
WHEREAS,theConsultantrepresentsthatitisqualifiedandpossessessufficientskills,
experience,equipment,andnecessarycapabilities,including:technical.andprofessional
expertise, when riquired, to perform the- services and/or tasks as set forth in this Ageement upon
which the City is relYing'
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants' and performances
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Scooe of Services. The Consultant shall perform such services and accomplish such- CL- furnishing of all labor, materials, facilities and equipment necessary
for full performan"" tt
".-eor,
is ioentified and designated as consultant's Responsibilities
throughout this Ag."".""i, u"i u'more particularl-y described in Scope of Work detailed
in pxliuit e, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Project").
2. Term. This Project shall begin on August 4,2014' and promptly be completed within by
E6i-uary 28, 201 5, in accordance with the schedule'
3. ComDensation and Pavment'
3.1 Payment for services provided hereunder, shall be made following the
p"iforrnun." of tu"i-tt*ittt' Such payment shall be full compensation for work
performed o. ..*i""t t"na.red, and'foi all labor, materials' supplies, equipment'
and incidentals necessary to complete the Project'
3,2 No payment shall be made for any services rendered by the Consultant.except. for
services identified and set forth in this Agreement except as may be authorized by
a written supplemental agreement approved by the City'
professional services Agreement- BerScr AUAM, Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges
Page I
J.J
J.9
The City shall pay the Consultant for work performed under this Agreement upon
timely submitted invoices detailing work performed and expenses for which
,reimbursement is sought. The City shall approve all invoices before payment is
issued. Payment shall occur within thirty (30) days of receipt and approval ofan
invoice.
The City shall pay the Consultant for all work performed and expenses incurred
under this Agreement, as follows.
tr Hourly (Single Rate): $- per hour plus actual expenses
incurred as provided under this Agreement, but not to exceed a total of
without prior written authorization by the City; or
n Hourly (Multiple Rate): Such rates as identified on Exhibit
-,
plus
actual exDenses incurred as provided under this Agreement, but not to
exceed a total of $
by the City; or
X Fixed Sum: A total of$ 379.083; or
without the orior written authorization
Other:!
4.Reoorts and Inspections.
4.1 The Consultant at such times and in such forms as the City may require, shall
furnish to the City such statements' records, studies, surveys, reports, dlu' 1n9
information as the City may request pertaining to mafters covered by this
Agreement.
4.2 The consultant shall, at any time during normal business hours and as often as the
City or the Washinglon State Auditor may reasonably deem necessary' make
uuiiluble for examination all of its records and data with respect to all matters
covered, directly or indirectly, by this Agreement and shall permit the.City' or its
designaied auth-orized ,"preslntrtin" to audit and inspect other data relating to all
matt-ers covered by this Agreement. The City shall receive a copy of all audit
reports made by tire agenry or firm as to the consultant,s activities. The city
may, at its disCretion, .ondu"t un audit at its expense' using its own or outside
uudito.r, of the consultant's activities which relate, directly or indirectly, to this
Agreement. Consultant shall be provided a copy of such reports'
4.3TheConsultant,duringthetermofthisAgreement,shallobtainallpermitsand
registration documents necessary for the performance of its work and for the
execution of services at its own expense, and shall maintain its validity. Upon
request, the Consultant shall deliver to the City copies of these- licenses'
registration documents, and permits or proofoftheir issuance or renewal'
Professional S€rvices Agreement- Bcrger ABAM, Feasibility Traffic Study for lnterchanges
4.4 Consultant shall maintain books, records and documents, which sufliciently and
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of this
Agreement, and shall maintain such accounting procedures and practices as may
be necessary to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this
Agreement. These records shall be subject, at all reasonable times, to inspection,
review, or audit as provided above.
6.
4,5 The Consultant shall retain all books, records, documents or other material
relevant to this Agreement for three (3) years after its expiration. Consultant
agrees that the City, or its designee, shall have full access and right to examine
any of said materials at all reasonable times during this period.
0wnershio end Use of Documents.
5.1 All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data, information, drawings and
documents made, collected, or prepared by the Consultant for performing the
services subject to this Agreement, as well as any final product, collectively
referred to as "work product," shall be deemed as the exclusive property of the
City, including copyright as secured thereon' Consultant may not use them except
in ionnection with the performance ofthe services under this Agreement or with
the prior written consent of the City. Any prior copyrighted materials owned.by
the consultant and utilized in the performance of the services under this
Agreement,orembeddedinwiththematerials,productsandservicesprovided
thireunder, shall remain the property of the Consultant subject to a license
granted to the city for their continued use of the products and services provided
inder this Agreement. Any work product used by the Consultant in.lhe
performance o? these services which it deems as "confidential," "proprietary"' or
a "trade secret" shall be conspicuously designated as such'
5.2 ln the event of consultant's default, or in the event that this Agreement ls
terminated prior to its completion, the work product of the Consultant' along with
a summary of the servicis performed to date of default or termination' shall
become the property of the City, and tender of the work product and summary
shall be a prer"quisite to final payment under this Agreement The summary of
services piovided shall be preiared at no additional cost, if the Agreement is
terminated through default
-by
the consultant. If the Agreement is terminated
through convenience by the City, the City agrees to pay Consultant for the
preparation ofthe summary of services provided.
g$I8eistds.
6,1 Consultant acknowledges that the City is an agency subject to Chapter .42'56.
RCW,,Public Records-Act." All preliminary drafts or notes prepared or .gathered
by the Consultant, and recommendations ofthe Consultant are exemPt prior to the
ui..pt*.t by the City or public citation by the City in connection with City
action.
Profcssional Services Agre€ment- B€rgef ABAM' Feasibility Traflic Study lior Interchanges
o.z If the Consultant becomes a custodian of public records ofthe City and request
for such records is received by the City, the Consultant shall respond to the
request by the City for such records within five (5) business days by either
providing the records, or by identifuing in writing the additional time necessary to
provide the records with a description of the reasons why additional time is
needed. Such additional time shall not exceed twenty (20) business days unless
extraordinary good cause is shown.
1
6.3 ln the event the City receives a public records request for protected work product
of the Consultant within its possession, the City shall, prior to the release of any
protected work product or as a result of a public records request or subpoena,
provide Consultant at least ten (10) business days prior written notice of the
pending release and to reasonably cooperate with any legal action which may be
initiated by the Consultant to enjoin or otherwise prevent such release.
Indeoendent Contractor Relationshin.
7.1 The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship is created by this
Agreement. The City is interested primarily in the results to be achieved; subject
tJthe scope of services and the specific requirements of this Agreement, the
implementation of services will lie solely with the discretion of the consultant.
No agent, employee, officer or representative ofthe Consultant shall be deemed to
be an employee, agent, officer, or representative ofthe City for any purpose, and
the employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits or
privilegis ihe city provides for its employees. The Consultant will be solely and
intirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of its agents, employees, officers,
subcontractors or representatives during the performance of this Agreement'
7.2 In the performance of the services provided in this Agreement, consultant is an
independent contfactor with full authority to control and direct the performance of
the details ofthe work, however, the results ofthe work contemplated herein must
meettheapprovaloftheCityandshallbesubjecttotheCity'sgeneralrightsof
inspection and review to secure the satisfactory oompletion thereof'
7.3 The consultant shall comply with all state and Federal laws including, but not
limited to:
7.3.1 The definition requirements of RCW 50'04.140 (Employment Security)'
7.3.2 RCW 51.08'195 (lndustrial Insurance).
7.3.3 Obtain a City ofPasco business license.
7.4 The City may, at its sole discretion, require the Consultant to remove any
employee, agent or servant from employment on this Project who, in the City's
sole discretion, may be detrimental to the City's interest'
Professional Services Agreement' Berger ABAM, Feasibility Traffic study for Interchanges
Indemnilicstion,
8.1 The Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers fiom any and all claims and causes of
action, including, but not limited to, actions of law or administrative proceedings
for all injuries to persons or damages to property, and all losses, damages,
demands, suits, judgrnents, including attorney fees, arising out ol or as a result
of, or in connection with the work performed under this Agreement, and caused or
occasioned in whole or in part by reason of errors, negligent acts or omissions of
the Consultant or its subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement, except
for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City, its officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers.
8.2 Should a Court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject
to RCW 4.24.1 15, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily
injuries or damages to properry caused by or resulting from the concurrent
nigligence of the Consultant, and the City, its officers, employees, agents and
uoiunl"ers, the Consultant's liability and obligation to defend hereunder shall only
be the proportionate extent ofthe Consultant's negligence.
d.J It is further agreed that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the
Consultant's waiver of immunity under lndustrial lnsurance, Title 5l RCW'
solely for the purposes of this indemnification.
8.4 No liability shall attach to the city by reason of entering into this Agreement
except as expressly provided herein.
g.5 This indemnification shall include damages, penalties and attomey fees sustained
as a result of Consultant's delayed or failed performance ofSection 6 above
8.6 This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties, and the provisions ofthis
section shall survive the expiration or termination ofthis Agreement'
Insurance. The consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
Agr..r""t, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or, damage to property-which
miy arise
'from or in innection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors'
9.1 Minimqm Scooe of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the b?es
described below:
g.l.lAutomobileLiabilityinsurancecoveringallowned,non-owned,hiredand
leasedvehicles.CoverageshallbewrittenonlnsuranceServiceso{Iice
(ISO) form CA 00 0l o; a substitute form providing equivalent liability
"on"'ug".Ifnecessary'thepolicyshallbeendorsedtoprovidecontractualliability coverage.
Professional Servicca Agecment- Bcrger ABAM, Feasibility Tramc Study lbr lnterchanges
Page 5
9.
9.2
9. I .2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO
occurrence form CG 00 0l and shall cover liability arising from premises,
operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising
injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's
Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respest to the work
performed for the City.
9.1.3 Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial lnsurance
laws of the State of Washington.
9.1.4 Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession.
Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following
insurance limits:
9.2.1 Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for
bodily injury and property damage of$1,000,000 per accident'
9.2.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no
less than:
tr $1.000,000 each occurrence;
tr $2,000,000 general aggregate; or
tr $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2'000'000 general aggregate
9.2.3 Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than:
tr $ 1,000,000 per claim;
tr $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or
tr $- per claim; and $- per policy aggregate limit
Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed
!" """t"1", G following provisions for Automobile Liability, Professional
Liability, and Commercial General Liability insurance:
9.3.1 The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as
respects the City. Any insurance' self-insurance, or insurance pool
coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
9.3.2 The Consultant's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall
not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written
notice by certified mail, retum receipt requested, has been given to the
CitY.
Professional Services Agreement- Berger ABAM, Feasiblllty Trafnc Study lbr lnterchanges
Psge 6
t.)
9.4
9.)
Acceotability of Insurers. Insurance is to placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best rating of not less than A:VIl.
Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall fumish the City with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not
necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the
insurance requirements ofthe Consultant before commencement ofthe work.
10.Nondiscrimination. ln the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant will not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the grounds of race,
creed, oolor, national origin, sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory,
mental or physical handicap; provided that the prohibition against discrimination in
employment because of handicap shall not apply if the particular disability prevents the
proper performance ofthe particular worker involved. The Consultant shall ensure that
applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment in the
performance ofthis Agreement without discrimination because oftheir race, creed, color,
national origin, sex, marital status, age or the presence ofany sensory, mental or physical
handicap. Consultant shall take such action with respect to this Agreement as may be
required to ensure full compliance with local, State and Federal laws prohibiting
discrimination in employment.
Covenant Asainst Continsent Fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed
nor ."t"t""d a"y company,. firm, or person, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement; and that it has not paid
or agreed to pay any company, person or firm, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or
other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement.
Assisnment and Subcontractinq.
12.1 The City has awarded this Agreement to the Consultant due to its unique
qualifications to perform these services. The Consultant shall not assign (or
subcontract other than as specifically identified in Exhibit A) its performance
under this Agreement or any portions of this Agreement without the prior written
consent ofthi City, which consent must be sought at least thirty (30) days prior to
the date ofany proposed assignment.
12.2 Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each
provision of this Agreement including Section 6, Public Records; Section l0'
irlondiscrim ination; proper bidding procedures where applicable; and all local,
State and Federal statutes, ordinances and guidelines.
12.3 Any technical or professional service subcontract not listed in this Agreement'
must have prior written approval by the City.
Professional Services Agreement- Berger ABAM, Feasibility Trafnc study for Interchanges
It.
12.
13.Termination.
l3.l Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any
reason upon giving the other party no less than ten (10) business days written
notice in advance ofthe effective date ofsuch termination.
13.2 Termination for Cause. Ifthe Consultant fails to perform in the manner called for
in this Agreement, or if the Consultant fails to comply with any other provisions
of this Agreement and fails to correct such noncompliance within five (5)
business days of written notice thereo{ the City may terminate this Agreement for
cause. Termination shall be effected by serving a notice of termination on the
Consultant setting forth the manner in which the Consultant is in default. The
Consultant will only be paid for services and expenses complying with the terms
of this Agreement, incurred prior to termination.
General Provisions.
14.1 For the purpose ofthis Agreement, time is ofthe essence.
14.2 Notice. Notice provided for in this Agreement shall be sent by:
'14.2.1 Personal service upon the Project Administrators.
14.2.2 Cerrified mail to the physical address of the parties, or by electronic
transmission to the e-mail addresses designated for the parties below.
14.3 The Project Administrator for the purpose ofthis Agreement shall be:
14.3.1 For the City:Ahmad Qayoumi, or his/her designee
525 North 3rd
Pasco, WA 99301
14.3.2 For the Consultant: Jilma Jimenez, or his/her designee
33301 Ninth Ave South, Suite 300
Federal Way, WA 98003
Dispute Resolution.
l5.t This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and entered
into and delivered within the State of Washington, and it is agreed by each party
hereto that this A$eement shall be govemed by the laws of the State of
Washinglon.
Professional Services Agreement- Berger ABAM, Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges
Pagc 8
14.
15.
15.2 In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default, or
interpretation of this Agreement, the Project Administrators, or their designees,
shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the event the
dispute cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be
resolved by arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.044, as amended, with both parties
waiving the right of a jury trial upon trial de novo, with venue placed in Pasco,
Franklin County, Washington. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled
to its reasonable attomey fees and costs as additional award and judgment against
the other.
16. Nonwaiver, Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this Agreement, shall not constitute a waiver of any other
similar event or other provision of this Agreement.
17. Intesration. This Agreement between the parties consist in its entirety of this document
and any exhibits, schedules or attachments verified by initials as a part of Exhibit A. Any
modification of this Agreement or change order affecting this Agreement shall be in
writing and signed by both parties.
18. Authorization. By signature below, each party warrants that they are authorized and
empowered to execute this Agreement binding the City and the Consultant respectively.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first written above.
Professional Services Agreement- Berger ABAM, Feasibility Traffic Study fbr Interchanges
Pas€ 9
CITY OF PASCO. WASHINGTON
Stan Strebel, Acting City
CONSULTANT
err, City Attomey
Q/ n.rg.rABAM
Transmittal Memorandum
To: Ms. Julie Valdez
City of Pasco
525 N. 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
l.ll0l li nlr A'/!nue Sorjih. Sriti 300. federal t'/arl VVJsirinqlon 96C0,r 2ti01l
2Crir4Jl.ll0() ' 206i431 2250Fax. \r'/?w .r b,: nr.co,"u
Fl- '' :1,': il
' . '
"ii.:L
PU3..
Date: 12 August 2014
Prolgct Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges
Our umber: A 15.0064.00
Youl I{umb6t:
Regardlng:
I Prints X Orlglnals ! Reproduclbles n Photocoples fi other
Remarks:
Julie,
Here's the signature page back for you. I made a coPy and kept the rest of the contlact/attachments- Let
me know if you have any questions or need anything else. I can be reached at Kell) .robir-u;on( ;lb:mco-u
or 2061431.-23M. Thank vou!
By:
l
i-',| |Kellv Robinson ' l\.. t '
Senior DeDartment Coord inatorTltle:
Exhibit A
Scope of Services
Clty of Pasco
Feaslblllty Trafflc Study for Intelchanges
Submitted to
Clty of Pasco
Pasco, Washlngton
July 2014
Submlttsd by
BergerABAM Inc.
33301 Inth Avenue South, Sulte 3OO
Fodoral way, Wathln€iton 98OO3'230O
Job o. P14,0125.OO
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
ABBREVIATIONS
PAGE
EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES FEASIBILITY TRAFFIC STUDY FOR INTERCHANGES 1
INTRODUCTrON........................... ................1
PHYSTCAL PROIECT LIMITS.... .....,...........1
Freeway
scoPE oF sERvIcEs......,..
GENERAL ASSUMPTION(S)
WORK ELEMENT 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Task 1.1 - Implement Quality Conhol Progrant
Task 1.2 - Monthly Progress Reports and Billings
Task 1,3 -Progress Meeting(s)
Task 1.4 - Project Adminishation
Task 2.4 - Collect AirSage O-D Data (OPtional)
lv
7
1
-t
2
2
4
5
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges
Pasco, Washington
BerSerABAM, Pl4.0125 00
luly 2014
Page iiExhibit A
WORK ELEMENT 3: CONSENSUS BUILD
Task 3,1 - Technical Advisory Committee
ING
Support
Task 3.2 - Executive Committee Support
WORK ELEMENT 4: 2&O TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING 8
I
9
Task 4,3 - Existing and Future Baseline Conditions Report......,.......-...,,..,....,....,,.,.,..............,...9
WORK ELEMENT 5: ALTERNATMS EVALUATION...................... ............10
Task 5,1 - Identify Network Scenario A1ternatives,...............,,... ................,..10
Task 5.2 - Evaluate Network Scenarios ..,.......,,,,..,. .......,.... 10
WORK ELEMENT 6: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Task 5,1 - Public Involvement Plan
Task 7.1 - Preliminary Cost Estimate
PREPARATION REQUIREMENTS
Washington State Department of Transportation Publications
U.S. Deparhnent of Transportation Publications
Washington State Department of Ecology Publicatione
Other Publications
Task 4.1- BFCOG Coordination.
Task 4.2 - Review and Assess Traffic Model.......,,
7
11
11
12
13
13
13
13
13
City of Pasco
Feasibility Trafdc Study for lnterchanges
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0r5.00
July 2014
Pag€ iii
ABBRR'IATIOlIS
The following abbreviations are referred to throughout this scope of work.
AASHTO American Associate of State Hithway and Transportation Officials
BFCOG Benton-Franklin Council of Govemments
CAD Computer Aided Design
DOE Washintton State Department of Ecology
EC Executive Committee
FHWA FederalHighwayAdministration
GIS Geographic lnformation System
IJR Intersection Justification Report
l-182 Interstate 182
LAG Local Agency Guidelines
PIP Public Interaction Plan
PS&E Plans, Specifications, and Estimates
QA/QC QualityAssurance/QualityControl
ROW Right-of-Way
SOW Scope of Work
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
USDOT U.S. Department of TransPortation
WSDOT Washington State Department of TransPortation
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traffic Study for lnterchanges
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0125.00
July 2014
PaSe iv
flHIBITA
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FEASIBILITY TRAFFIC STUDY FOR INTERCHAI{GES
INTRODUCNO
The City of Pasco (CITY) has experienced recession-defying growth over the past five years.
This growth has resulted in high levels of congestion throughout the city and particularly in
corridors that provide access to regional facilities. Current planning efforts estimate additional
population growth between 50 and 75 percent over the next 20 years. Existing population levels,
as well as exp€cted growth, are driving the need to identifu the best way to redistribute regional
traffic within the CITY'S transportation network.
The Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges (PROJECT) is the first phase of a multi-phased
proiect to identify, recomrnend, approve, and design a solution to the traffic congestion
thought-out the CITY. Under this scope of work (SOW), the CONSULTANT shall study the
feasibility of redistributing traffic to meet current and future traffic demands and identify
transportation improvement projects to reduce congestion.
Based on the results of the Feasibility Traffic Study, future phases of the Project could include
completion of an Interchange fustification Report (IJR), environmental documentation, and
PS&E document. The CITY may elect to do any or all of the additional work noted under a
separate scopes of work.
PHYSICAL PROJECT LIMII!;
The immediate PROJECT area is approximately located along I-182 from the Columbia River
east to SR 395 and bounded by Court Street on the south and Powerline Road on the north. The
roads, intersections, and interchange imProvements, if implemented, would reduce congestion
at the I-182lRoad 68 interchange and improve regional traffic mobility in the Pasco area. The
PROIECT limits for the traffic analysis and modeling will include:
F eeway
o I-182 from Columbia River to SR 395
Roadways
o On Court Street - From Road 68 to Road 20
o On Road 20 - from Court Street to Powerline Road
o On Powerline Road - from Road 20 to Road 68
o On Road 58 - from Powerline Road to Court Street
lntolsectlons
o In addition to the freeway segments listed above, and the interchanges within the limits of
those segmentg the project limits will include up to 20 inters€ctions. Any new intersections
created by the proposed access point revision will be included in the 20 intersection total.
BerBerABAM, P14.0125.00
,uly 2014
Page'l
City of Paro
Feasibility Tiaffic Study for Interchanges
Pasco, Washington Exhibit A
Alternative intersection configurations, geometrieq and traffic control strategies do not
constitute additional intersections.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
This SOW details work elements needed to support the CITY in the selection of a preferred
configuration. The SOW shall consist of the following major work elements.
o Work Element 1 - Proiect Management
o Work Element 2 - Background/Data Collection
o Work Element 3 - Consensus Building
o Work Element 4 - Altematives Evaluation
o Work Element 5 - Public Involvement
o Work Element 6 - Estimates and Writing Grants
GENERAL ASSUMPTION(S)
o All communications with resource agencies and the CITY will be coordinated through
CITY's public works director and/or his designee, unless otherwise authorized.
o In addition to PROJECT limits identified above, it is assumed that intersections analyzed
will be generally bounded by Powerline Road to the north, Road 20 to the east, Court Sheet
to the south, and Road 100 to the west.
o Work detailed in this SOW shall be completed in accordance with the schedule below and
per the project schedule developed under Task 1.6.
Phase 1 - Foaslblllty Trafffc Study tor Intorchangea
CONSULTANT Notice to Proceed August 2014
Feasibility Study February 2015
r This SOW assumes that the CONSULTANT shall perform all design tasks necessary to
complete the traffic feasibility study.
o The CONSULTANT shall operate similar to and shall fully support the CITY's Public Works
Department. When altematives are being considered or decisions are being made, the CITY,
a-long with WSDOT and/or FHWA, will make final decisions.
o For any field investigations, acquiring the permission of Private landowners whose ProPerty
would be visited will be the responsibility of the CITY. Permission must be obtained prior
to fieldwork on privately owned land. Right-of-entry Permits may take up to 60 days to
acquire.
o The CONSULTANT shall use the following computer software in the performance of the
engineering and design work for this contract. All files shall be provided in an IBM-
compatible format.
- Engineering software: InRoads (version 08.08.00.46, or latest)
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traffic Study for lnterchanges
Pasco, WashinSton
BergerABAIvl, P14.0125.00
July 2014
Page 2Exhibit A
- CAD software: Bentley MicroStation (version 8.05.02.70, or latest) and AutoCAD
(version currently used by CITY)
- Scheduling software: Microsoft Project or Primavera P6
- Microsoft Office, Word, Excel (latest version)
- English units for plans, engineerin& and documents
o When use4 the term "minor revisiong" denotes revisions that address typograPhical,
and/or grammar edits, and or specific comments from a reviewer that do not require
additional analysis and that will not expand the scope of work and/or Prior work findints.
Work Peformod by the CITY
Throughout the duration of the project, the CITY will perform services, furnish informatiorL
and answer questions on CITY standard procedures for plan preparation.
The following services will be performed by the CITY.
o The CITY will acquire any rights-of-entry required to perform this task work.
r The CITY will assist the CONSULTANT, if required, in obtaining information from and/or
coordination with other agencies.
WORK ELEME T 1: PROJECT MA AGEMEI{T
The CONSULTANT shall conduct general Project Management and Project Administration
activities throughout the life of the PROIECT. Management and Administration activities will
include Quality Control, Monthly Progress Reporting and Billing, and Progress Meeting(s) as
described in Subtasks 1.1 to 1.5 below.
Task 1,1 - lmplement Quallty Control ProElam
The CONSULTANT shall conduct quality control on all PROJECT deliverables as outlined in
BergerABAM's intemal Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan. The CONSULTANT
shall develop a memorandum that outlines how the QA/QC Plan will be applied to the project
and will identify the CONSULTANT's and CITY's responsibility throughout the life of the
proiect.
Dellverabls{3)
o QA/QC memorandum (electronic copy)
Taok 1,2 - Monthly Prog?@3 Reports and BllllngS
The CONSULTANT shall prepare monthly progress rePorts, in a form approved by the CITY,
that outlines in written and graPhical forms the various phases of the work, and the order of
performance, in sufficient detail so that the progess of the work can be easily evaluated. These
reports shall
o Highlight project milestones
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traifi€ Study for Interchanges
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0125.00
lury 2014
Page3Exhibit A
. Tartet potential problem areas needing special attention or coordination prior to delays
occurring and provide a proposal for addressing problem areas
o Outline activities planned for the next period
o Compare actual work progress with contractual obligations
o Show work complete (%) versus budget expended (%) for major tasks
Progress reports shall include current scheduling reports, indicating all progress to date and
resources expended. Progress shall be monitored and reported in diagram and quantitative
forms to present a clear, concise, and understandable picture of the project status. This update
shall also include any changes in schedule, sequence, or resource loading. If any schedule
delays have occurred, a plan for bringing the work back on schedulq and back on budget, shall
be included.
Invoices shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT in a form and detail as approved by the CITY,
and subrnitted on a monthly basis. These shall be supported by detailed record keeping closely
tracking the prolect budget and expenditures.
Dollvorable(s)
o Monthly progress reports, incorporating project schedule revisions as appropriate
(electronic copy)
o Monthly invoices
Task 1.3 -Progre&e Meetlng(s)
The CONSULTANT and a representative from the CITY's Public Works Department shall meet
on a regular basis to review the progress of the proiect. Meetint(s) shall be conducted on an
informal basis and held at a location chosen by the CITY, or at the CONSULTANT's Vancouver
office. Progress meetings shall include in attendance two staff (on average) from the
CONSULTANT at each meeting, in addition to representatives from subconsultant team
members when appropriate.
Assumption(s)
o For budgeting purposes it was assumed that progress meetints would be held every month
with an option of two additional progress meetings, for a maximum of eight progress
meetings.
o Five progress meetings will be held in Pasco at a location chosen by the CITY.
o Three progress meetings will be held in the CONSULTANT's Vancouver office.
Dollverable{r}
o Eight meeting agendas
o Eight meeting notes
City of Pas€o
Feasibility Traffic Study for LrterchanSes
Pas.o, Washington
BerSerABAM, P14.0125.00
luly 2014
Page 4ExNbit A
fask 1.4 - ProJect Admlnbtratlon
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with subconsultants regarding contracting procedures,
shall prepare and execute contracts with individual subconsultants, and shall address contract-
related issues with the subconsultants as they arise during the proiect. As part of this task, the
CONSULTANT shall also provide as-needed support to the CITY in the intemal administration
functions of the PROIECT. This support may include participation at Counci-l briefings.
Astumptlon(s)
o The CONSULTANT shall participate in a maximum of two Council briefings.
fask 1.5 - Phase 2 Scoplng
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a detailed SOW document for work to be performed for
Phase 2. In addition to describing the activity the SOW shall also describe the level of detail
expected for each work element. The CONSULTANT shall PrePare a draft scope for the CITY
to review. Following the Clfi's review, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a final scope that
incorporates CITY comments.
Dgllverable(3)
o Draft Phase 2 Scope
o Final Phase 2 Scope
Task 1.6 * ProJoct Schedulc
The CONSULTANT shall prePare a project schedule that includes comPletion of all items
identified in this SOW. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a draft proiect schedule for the CITY
to review. Following the Clfi's review, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a final project
schedule that incorporates CITY comments.
The CONSULTANT's project manager shall conduct the Proiect tracking, document control,
and coordination efforts necessary for project execution. These efforts shall include the
continuous tracking of schedules, budgets, and products; coordination with subconsultants
relating to work in progress; ard coordination with WSDOT.
Itellverable(s)
o Draft project schedule
o Final project schedule
WORX ELEMEI{T 2: BACKGROUT{D,/DAr COLLECTION
Task 2.1 - Baee Map
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a refined topographic base maP of the Proiect area described
in the PROJECT limits section of this contract using GIS data, and existing base maPPing
information provided by the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall use this GIS base map in the
development of the PROJECT feasibility study.
A'rumption(t)
o The CITY will provide available base mapping information
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traffic Study for lnterchanges
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0125.00
t]uly 2014
Page 5Exhibit A
. The CITY will obtain base mapping information of I-182 and I-395 from WSDOT
o ROW and property boundary information will be provided by the CITY in electronic
shapefile format
o There is no specific deliverable anticipated for this task
o The results of this task are needed to complete deliverables for Work Element 4
faek2.2 - Prevlous Studlos and Reports
The CITY will provide useable transportation data and analysis files to the CONSULTANT for
review. A maximum of four background studies coordination meeting between the CITY and
CONSULTANT shall be conducted to evaluate previously developed information and
alternatives to be evaluated as part of the feasibility study PROJECT.
Aarumptlon(E)
o A maximum of 10 studies or plans will be reviewed
e Maximum of four background study coordination meetings, assumed to be held via
conference call or video conference
Dellvelable(s)
o Background Studies Coordination Meeting minutes (4 max - one electronic copy per
me€ting)
Task 2.3 - Trafflc Counts
The CITY will provide PM peak traffic volume data from prior studies to the CONSULTANT
for review. The CITY will provide new weekday PM peak period (4Pm to 5Pm) intersection
turning movement counts for study intersections where identified.
Assumptlon(s)
o The CITY will provide all traffic data required for the feasibility study
r There is no specific deliverable anticipated for this task
r The results of this task are needed to complete deliverables for Work Element 4
Task 2.4 - Collost Alrsag€ (}D Data (Optlonal)
Upon authorization from the CITY, the CONSULTANT shall review the Origin-Destination (O-
D) information and estimation methodology from the regional travel demand model. If the
project team determines that supplemental O-D data is required for analysis or calibration of
travel forecasts, CONSULTANT shall obtain additional data, which could include BlueTooth
surveys or archived cell phone O-D information from AirSage. This data must identify
weekday PM peak hour O-D data within Pasco (at a TAZ level resolution) and to/from
surrounding areas.
Dsllverable(s)
o O-D data and summary
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, P'I4.0125,00
llly 2014
Page 6Exhibit A
WORK ELEMET{T 3: COltlSEt{SUS BUILDING
Ta3k 3.1 - Technlcal Advbory Commlttoo Support
The CITY will idenfify, recruit, and/or appoint Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) members.
The CONSULTANT shall serve the TAC in an advisory capacity and as a meeting facilitator
and organizer, and shall not be included as a member of the team. The TAC's participation in
the PROIECT will loosely follow some of the guidelines in Section 220.M (3) of WSDOT's
Design Manual. The CONSULTANT shall provide support to the CITY at a maximum of four
TAC meetings. The CONSULTANT will, in collaboration with the CITY, prepare a draft and
final TAC charter and operational protocols, meeting agenda, distribute meeting notices to the
members of the TAC, facilitate TAC meetingg and prepare and distribute meeting summaries
to TAC members.
A!!umptlon(E)
r TAC meetings will be held in Olympia or Vancouver, Washington.
r The CITY will prepare and process selection/appointment letters to the TAC members.
Mo6tlng(s)
o Maximum of four 2-hour meetings
D6llv6rable(s)
o Draft and final TAC charter and operational protocols
. Meeting agendag notificatiory facilitatiory and summaries for six meetings (one electronic
coPy)
faek 3,2 - Exocutlvo Commltteo Suppot
The CITY will identify, recruit, and/or appoint Potential Executive Committee (EC) members.
The EC members shall consist of at least two CITY council members, two planning commission
members, the port commissioner, Columbia Basin College board member, and the WSDOT
regional administrator.
The CONSTILTANT shall serve the EC in an advisory capacity and as a meeting facilitator and
organizer, and shall not be included as a member of the team. The CONSULTANT shall
provide support to the CITY at a maximum of two EC meetings. The CONSULTANT will, in
collaboration with the CITY, prepare a draft and final EC charter and operational protocols,
meetint atenda, distribute meeting notices to the members of the EC facilitate EC meetingt
and prepare and distribute meeting summaries to EC members.
Assumptlon(s)
o EC meetings will be held at the CITY's Public Works office
o The CITY will determine the makeup and number of individuals on the PROJECT's EC The
CITY will prepare and process selection/aPPointment letters to the EC members
M€€tlng(3)
o Maximum of two (2) 2-hour meetings
City of Pas.o
Feasibility Trafic Study for Interchanges
Pasao, Washington
BetgerABAM, P14.0125.00
hrly m14
Page 7Erlubit A
Deliverable(!)
. Draft and final EC charter and operational protocols
o Meeting agendas, notification, facilitation, and summaries for two meetings (one electronic
coPy)
WORK ELEME T 4: BASELII{E ATIALYSIS AI{D 2(XO TRAVEL DEMAT{D MODELII{G
Task 4.1 - BFCOG and Partnor Agency Coordlnatlon
To meet the requirements for Interchange Justification Reports, a year 2040 forecast is needed.
Based on the size of the study area and the range of network altematives that will be explored,
extrapolating post-processed 2030 volumes from the current (Benton-Franklin Council of
Govemments) BFCOG regional travel demand model is not the preferred approach. The
CONSULTANT shall coordinate with BFCOG and CITY staff to determine a methodology for
developing a 2040 land use forecast for Pasco, as well as an approach for scaling growth in
surrounding areas and the extemal model gateways. The CONSULTANT shall then work with
CITY staff to develop the City 2040 land use data and supply that to BFCOG in order for
BFCOG to create a new travel demand model scenario.
The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the CITY and partner agencies to identify forecasting
and analysis methods. CONSULTANT shall prepare an Analysis Methods and Assumptions
document that describes proposed analysis and forecasting methods and tools, data
requirements, study locations, time periods for analysis, design year, and key assumptions. The
document will be utilized to guide all ongoing studies in the vicinity.
A$umption(3)
o A maximum of three coordination meetings with the CITY and/or BFCOG staft two
meetings assumed to be held via conference call and one meeting in Pasco
o CITY staff will lead the development of the land use data for the year 2M0 forecast,
including identifying the allocation of future land use growth to TAZs within the CITY's
urban growth area. The CONSULTANT shall provide input to the CITY to help determine
the year 2040 growth increment and to determine the methodology for allocating the land
use. The CONSULTANT shall review the land use allocations and support the CITY in
providing the information in a format acceptable by BFCOG.
o Study intersections for operations analysis are assumed to include interchange ramP
terminals and up to 20 additional arterial/arterial or arterial/collector intersections
o The analysis time period is assumed to be the weekday PM peak hour
o Intersection operation metrics are assumed to include volume to caPacity, delay, and level
of service, which will be determined using Slmchro
D6llverable(E)
o Draft and final Analysis Methods and Assumptions document
r Three meeting agendas
o Three meetinq minutes
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traffic Study for lnterchan8es
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, Pl4.0125.00
July 2014
Page 8Exhibit A
Task 4.2 - Revlow and Ass€3 frafflc Modol
The CONSULTANT shall review the travel model zone and network structure for the study
area to determine necessary refinements for representing a collector-level network and ihe
corresponding land use loading. The CONSULTANT shall create focused (i.e., a refined model
scenario within the study area that maintain full regional model functionality) travel demand
model networks (existint year and 2040 baseline scenarios) that will be used to reassitn PM
peak period trip tables from the BFCOG regional travel demand model for analysis.
The CONSULTANT shall assess the study area roadway network for existing and future year
2040 baseline scenarios based on the performance measures created in Work Element 3. The
network performance measures are assumed to be metrics that can be evaluated with the
regional travel demand model network, possibly including:
o Total System Congestion (hours of delay)
o Average Trip Length for trips accessing I-182
o Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) in the study area
o VMT by Trip Type (through, regional, local) by Functional Class (freeway, arterial,
collector, local)
o Travel Time and Travel Routes between Key Origins and Destinations
The sfudy intersection performance measures are assumed to be mekics that can be evaluated
with travel demand model data and Highway Cnpacity Manual methodology operation
analysis, possibly including:
o PM peak hour volume-tG capacity ratio, level of service, and delay
o PM peak hour merge, diverge, and weave capacity calculations on I-182
. Growth in traffic volume at study intersections, including the growth of movements
accessing I-182 at interchange locations
Dellv€7abls(3)
o Draft Future Year 2040land use scenario data table
o Final Future Year 2040 land use scenario data table
Task 4.3 - Exbtlng and Futuro Easellne Condltlom Roport
The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Draft Existing and Future Baseline Conditions RePort that
describes the network traffic conditions and identifies oPPortunities and constraints for
developing network improvement scenarios. The rePort will be Pres€nted to the TAC and EC
to validate findings and to begin brainstorming network improvement scenarios. Comments
from the TAC and EC will be incorporated into a Final Existing and Future Baseline Conditions
Report.
Dellvelable(s)
o Draft Existing and Future Baseline Conditions Report
o Final Existing and Future Baseline Conditions Report
City of Pas.o
Feasibility Trafic Study for Interchanges
Pascq Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0125.00
IulY 2014
Page 9Exhibit A
WORK ELEME T 5: ALTERT{ATIVES R/ALUATION
Task 5.1 - ldentlfy etwork Scenarlo Alternatlvoe
Based on the Final Existing and Future Conditions Report, as well as input from TAC and EC
Meetings, ihe proiect team shall conduct a work session with CITY staff (and relevant proiect
partners) to develop a maximum of six initial network scenario altematives, including options
such as:
o Enhance the City arterial/collector grid connectivity
o Enhance the network with additional state highway crossings
r Enhance the network with additional or improved state highway connections
. Enhance the network City arterial/collector trid with a combination of added
connections and corridor widening
As part of the work session, the CONSULTANT shall conduct and document a qualitative
feasibility screenint of network improvements concePts based on factors such as construction
feasibility, potential environmental impact, Potential ProPerty impacts, and the ability to meet
design standards.
A33umptlon(E)
o One work session with CITY staff to develop and screen network scenarios
o A maximum of six initial network scenario altematives will be developed
Dollvorabl6{s)
o Initial network scenario altematives and screening results
Task 5,2 - Evaluate etwork Scenatloo
The CONSULTANT shall conduct an evaluation of the initial network scenarios comPared to
the network-based performance measures developed in Work Element 4 using the focused
travel demand model. The results of the initial network scenario evaluation will be
documented in a Draft Network Evaluation Report and will be presented to the TAC and EC to
identify scenario refinements or hybrid scenariog resulting in refined network altematives (uP
to 3).
The CONSULTANT shall conduct an evaluation of the refined network altematives, including
PM peak hour intersection operations, network performance measures, environmental and
constructability screening, and preliminary cost estimates. The findings from this analysis will
be documented in a Revised Draft Network Evaluation RePort. The report will include a
recommendations section that identifies a preferred improvement scenario, cost estimates,
potential phasin& and a clear identification of any interchange area improvements' The
Revised Draft Network Evaluation Report will be presented to the TAC and EC to discuss final
recommendations.
A$umptlon(s)
o A maximum of three (3) refined network altematives will be studied further
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traf6c Study for Interchanges
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0125.00
July 2014
Page 10Exhibit A
Dellverable(s)
. Draft Network Evaluation Report
o Revised Draft Network Evaluation Report
o Final Network Evaluation Report
WORK ELEMEI{T 6: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Task 6.1 - Publlc lnvolvom6nt Plan
The CONSULTANT shall develop a public involvement plan (PIP) that includes the following
elements.
o Public involvement goals (i.e., education on the project and environmental process, effective
stakeholder engatement), and public involvement schedule
o Target audiences (i.e., businesses, community groups, public agencies, Tribes, key
stakeholders, public officials, and broader public interests)
o Outline the focus and timing of the stakeholder, community, and public open house
meetings
r Identify communication tools (newsletters, Postert interactive web site, Presentations, and
media release content), including approaches to solicit inPut of thos€ traditionally
underserved by transportation (environmental justice and Title VI populations)
o The procedures for acknowledgin& considering, and responding to public comments
o Gather demographic data from the 2010 Census to identify the general locations of minority
and low-income populations within the study area. The 2010 Census data and local school
districts data shall also be reviewed to determine if populations in the study area will
require special accommodations in compliance with the Limited English Proficienry (LEP)
Act to include citiz€ns who may traditionally be left out of the public process. The
CONSULTANT shall modify this public process as aPProPriate for the specific customers
identified for thes€ project improvements.
Assumptlon(3)
o CITY will respond to all media inquiries and serve as the public information officer for this
PROIECT
o CIfi will provide input on targeted audiences
o The CITY will provide any additional information on hand regarding minority and low-
income communitieg and any known stakeholders from these communities that should be
engaged in the design process
Deliv€rablqs)
r Minority and low-income population maps
o Draft PIP (eleckonic copy) (one review)
o Final PIP (electronic copy) (one review)
Taek 6.2 - Open House
The CONSULTANT shall support the CITY in the planning, preparation, and facilitation of two
public open houses. The focus of the open houses will be to inform local residents, area
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traffic Study for lnterchanges
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, P14.0125.00
July 2014
Pag€ 11
businesses, property owners, and the community at large of the proiect features and schedule,
and gather input on the draft design altematives. The CITY will identify and secure an
appropriate venue (location) for the open houses.
The CITY will develop a public meeting plan that identifies procest format, necessary displays,
staffing for the meeting, advertising/public notice needt and preparation schedule. The CITY
will prepare all open house materials, such as a PowerPoint presentatiory comment
forms/questionnaires, sign-in sheett staff name tagg and meeting signage. Limited copies of
the most current project fact sheet will also be available explaining the proiect background,
purpose and need of the project, project area, proiect schedule, design altematives, and project
contact information. All printed materials will promote the available on-line open house option
for people unable to attend the live event. The CONSULTANT shall prepare exhibit boards that
identify the project area, proposed altematives, areas of impact, altemative evaluation criteria,
and the prorect schedules. The comment form shall solicit comments from the meeting
attendees. The CITY will prepare a summary of the meeting including tabulation of the written
comments received.
Assumptlon(3)
o The CITY will provide key staff to attend the open houses
o The CITY will reserve a venue and pay any potential room rental fees
o The CITY will set-up and facilitate the public open house meetings
o The CITY will write, prepare, print and mail fact sheets and newsletters
e The CITY will write, prepare public meeting materials including sign-in sheets and
comment forms
o The CITY will develop host, maintain, and update the project website
o The CITY will provide meeting notes and summarize the written comments received from
each open house
o Open houses will be advertised through the mailed fact sheet uPdate described in Task 6.2,
and through display advertising in the local newspaper
o All printed and/or e-mailed information will include link URL to the proiect website, which
will be identified as the pro)ect information hub
Me€ting(s)
o Two open house planning meetings with CITY staff
o Two public open house meetings
Dollverable(3)
o Maximum of six 2- by 3-foot exhibits/boards for each open house (one draft and final)
wORl( ELEME {T 7: COST ES MATE
Task 7.1 - Prellmlnary Cost Estlmato
The CONSULTANT shall prepare preliminary cost estimates for the PROJECT. The cost
estimate for the altematives screening process will consist of estimates developed for a
City of Pasco
Feasibility Tmffic Study for InterchanSes
Pasco, Washington
BergerABAM, Pl4.0125.00
.luly 2014
Page 12Exhibit A
maximum of six altematives using square footage costs for major items such as strucfures, new
roads/alignments, walls, and additional ROW.
Ar!umptlon(s)
e The CITY will provide approximate square footage costs for additional ROW
Dellverabl€ds)
. Cost estimates for six altematives analysis (electronic and five hard copies)
PREPARAIION REQUI REMEI{TS
It is anticipated that all design and engineering for facilities located within WSDOT ROW will
be developed using English units in accordance with the latest editiory amendments, and
revisions of the publications listed below. Design and engineering of facilities located within
the CITY will comply with CITY standards and design policies or in accordance with the
following publications as directed by CITY staff.
Washlnglton State Department ot Transporlatlon Publlcatlons
o Design Manual (M 22-01)
o Highway Runoff Manual (M31-016.1) in conjunction with Hydraulics Manual (M 23-03)
o Plans Preparation Manual (M 22-31)
o Amendments and General Soecial Provisions
o Standard Item Table
o ROW Manual
. Environmental Procedures Manual (M31-1)
o American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Publications (Latest
Versions)
r A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets
o Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, Sixte€nth Edition
o A Guide for Highway Landscape and Environmental Design
o Highway Desigrr and Operational Practices Related to Highway Safety (Yellow book)
o Roadside Design Guide
o Any American Association of State Highway Officials policy applicable where said policy is
not in conflict with the standards of State
U,s, Department of T?ansportatlon Publlcatlons
o Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways
o Highway Capacity Manual
Washlnglon Stato D6pattment of Ecology Publlcatlong
o 2004 DOE Stormwater Management Manual for Eastem Washington
Other Publlcatlons
o National Electrical Code
o Applicable County and CITY Publications
City of Pasco
Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges
Pasco, Washintton
BergerABAM, P14.0125.00
JulY 2014
Pate 13Exhibit A
Computor Hardware and Softwars
The CONSULTANT shall provide the PS&E package in the IBM-compatible format of
r Microsoft Office - Windows NT Version 4.0 or latest
r Microsoft Project - Version 4.1a or latest
. Internet Access with Transport Control Protocol/File Transfer Protocol (TCP/FTP)
capabilities and the CONSULTANT shall have an e-mail address
o CAD - MicroStatiory Bentley Systems, Inc. - MicroStation J or latest versiory including
continuous updates and AutoCAD 2013
o Design Software - Inroads latest versiory including continuous updates
The CONSULTANT shall obtain the latest versions of CITY's manuals.
Obtaining AASHTO, USDOT, and other non-WSDOT or CITY publications shall be the
CONSULTANT's resDonsibilitv
City of Pas.o
Feasibility Traffic Study for Interchanges
Pasco, WaEhington
BergerABAM, P14.0125.00
,uly 2014
Page 14Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Scope of Fees
Gity of Pasco
Feaslblllty Trafflc Study for Interchanges
Submltted to Clg of
Pasco Pasco.
Washlngton
tttly 2OL4
Submltto.l by
BergerABAM Inc.
33301 Inth Avonue South, Sulto 3O0
Federal Way, Washlnglon 98OO3-23OO
Job [o. P14.o125,OO
EXHIBIT E-1: Consultant Fee Oelermination
Analysis of Crds - BerterABAM Inc,
Direct SalaN Cost IDSC)
PERSONNEL Hours Pay Rate Cost
Principal 19 587.74 5 L,667
Project Manater
Project Engineer
Engineer/ De5igner
Planner/ Scientlst
Planner/Pl
Graphic/ CADD
Project Coordinator
Direct Salary Cost Total
Sabry Esc!latlon (sec.scalatlon tab)
Overhead Cort
Net Fee
Reimbursables
Travel/Parking
Reproduction/Postage
Computer/Speclal Equipment
Miscellaneo!s
BeTSeTABAM SUBTOTAL
Subconsultants: (see Exhiblt G)
DKS Associates
Jilma Jim€nez
Prepared By
481 s71.64
2!2 s47.08
34,459
9,981180 s34.94 6,2890 s44.23 -
134 s35.67 4,780
54 s35.01 1,94566 s35.20 2,323
1146
of Dsc 5
5 6L,444
30.00%
52.4%
SUBTOTAT S 190,053
110,187
of Dsc s 18,433
6,472
1,750
L,750
suBToTAr 70,372
5 200,435
47.2%Participation S 179,358
suEcoNsuLrANTs suBToTAt s t79,368
GRAND TOTAI
2l-J uF14
Date
BergerABAM lnc. Labor Estimate
Cltv of Posco - Feosibillv for tnterchanges
ABAM
DXS
Associates TOTAI,
DESCRIP']'toN
1,0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1.1 lmplement QC ProSram 90 0 90
7.2 Monthly Progress Reports and Eillinc
Monthlv Procress Reports (6 max)72 18
Monthlv Invoicing {6 max)18 t2 5U
SubTotol 24 48
1.3 Progress Meetings
Meeting Atendas (8 max)72 18
MeetinB Attendance (8 max - 5 Pas/2 Van)68
Meeting Notes {8 max)72 0 72
SubTotol 64 80 t44
t.4 Project Administration
Proiect Administration 104 0 104
Council griefings (2 Max - 2 Pas)18 27
SubTotol 722 2!143
1.5 Phase 2 Scoping
Draft Phase 2 Scope 50 20 70
Final Phase 2 Scooe 8 0 a
SubTotol 58 20 78
Project Schedule
Prepare Proiect Schedule 2a 0 z6
Onsoinc Schedule Tracking and Maintenance 0
SubTotol 64 0 64
TASI( HOURS 422 145
Cost Subtotals=$80,5(x)I 24,000 5 104,500
2.0 BACKGROUND/DATA COLTECTION
2.1 Base MaD
Prepare topographic base mao from existing GIS data 74 11
Mao of existinR utilities via GIS and field observations 0 0 0
SubTotal 74 11
2.2 Previous Studies and ReDorts
Review Background Studies (10 max)72 35
Backsround Studv Coordination Meetins (4 max - 4 Remot€)8 !7
Coordination Meeting Minutes (4 max)8 0 8
SubTotsl 28 40
Traffic Counts
Review Traffic Data 2 15 77
SubTotol 2 L1
Page 2 of 16
BergerABAM Inc. Labor Estimate
CiW of Pdsco - Feasibiliry for lnterchonses
ABAM
Dr(s
Associates TOTAL
DESCRIPTION
2.4 Collect Airsage O-D Data (Optional)
Review Travel Model OD Data 0 29
Review New OD Data and Summarize for Travel Model 70
sUOtOtOI 97 99
TASK HOURS 46 153 2@
Cost Subtotals=I 9,100 $ 18,500 S 27,7@
3.0 CONSENSUS BUILDING
3.1 Technical Advisory Committee Support
Meeting Agenda and Preparation (4 max)24 5d
MeetinR Attendance (4 max - 2 Olv/2 Van)44 38 82
Meeting Notes (4 max)72 0 t2
Team Chartering Tech Memorandum 2A 0 28
SubTotol 108 76 184
Executive Committee Support
Meeting Agendas and Presentations (2 max)27
Meeting Attendance (2 max - 2 Pas)74 2L 35
Meeting Notes (2 max)6 0 6
SubTotol 24 42 66
TASK HOURS 132 118 250
cost Subtotals=s 23,400 s 16,800 5 4,2@
4.0 2O4O TRAVEI DEMAND MODELING
4.7 BFCOG Coordination
Methods and Assumotions Memorandum 4 47 51
Develop 2040 Land Use Scenarios 2 40
Meeting Agenda and Preparation (3 max)2 0 2
Meeting Attendance (3 max - 1 Pas/2 Remote)18 40 5d
Meeting Notes (3 max)11 0 11
SubTotal 37 L27 154
Review and Assess Traffic Modelinc
Travel Demand Model Focus Area Refinements 0 92
Travel Demand Model Svstem Performance Measures 0 54 54
StudV Intersection and Segment Performance Measures 2 61
SubTotal 2 207
Existing and Future gaseline Conditions Report
Draft Existins and Future Baseline Conditions Reoort 2 55
Final ExistinS and Future Baseline Conditions Report 24
SubTotol 79 tt5
TASK HOURS 43 413 456
cost Subtotals=s 8,600 s 43,500 I 52,100
Page 3 of '16
BergerABAM Inc. Labor Eslimate
CiW ol Posco - Fedslbttb for tnterchdnoes
ABAM
DKS
Assoclates TOTAI
DESCRIN 10N
5.0 ALTERNATIVES EVALUAIION
ldentifv Network Scenario Alternatives
Preoare Euild Alternatives Develooment Session Materials L28 0 rzd
ldentification of Alternatives and Brainstorming Session 40
SubTotol 158 46
Evaluate Network Scenarios
Refine Network Alternatives (6 max)92 L42 234
Draft Network Evaluation Report 4 57
Revised Draft Network Evaluation Report 2 743 145
Final Draft Network Evaluation Report 5b 58
SubTotal 100 398 498
TASK HOURS 28 444 712
Cost Subtotals=5 35,500 s 47,s00 s 83,000
6.0 PUBIIC INVOI.VEMENT
6.1 Public lnvolvement Plan
Draft PIP 0 28
Final PIP 11 0 11
SubTotol 39 39
6.2 Open House
Open House Planninc Meetincs {2 max - 2 Pas}0 55
Graphics and Boards (6 max per meetinc)48 0 /t8
Open House Attendance (2 max)30 20 50
Review Open House Meeting Notes (2 max)0 6
SubTotal 140 20 160
TASK HOURS t79 20 199
Cost Subtotals=s 24,900 s 3,600 I 28,s00
7,O COST ESTIMATE
11 PreliminarV Cost Estimate for Alternatives
Preliminarv Cost Estimate for Alternatives (6 max)0 56
SubTotol 56 55
TASK HOURS o
Cost Subtotals=s 8,000 t s 8,000
TOTAL PROJECT HOURS 1.145 1,303 2.449
Page 4 of 16
EXHISITE.l
tueladon E.limal6
dry ol P.*. . t..nb Iy tor h..ch.na.r
l{aP and lJt - Ph.. I
E @btbnE ahntt -con od f....gtp,bu ia.
O:lso.$.\Wofting[SdrJmfi \P$co tJR\2014_07-21_-_FTNAL_Fo€_E!!m.t. i.r
EXHIBIT E-1
BergerABAM Inc. Reimbursable Estimate
BerterABAM lnc.
REIMBURSABLES
lravel/Parklnt
Airline Travel
Per Diem
Lodging
Miles
Parklng
R€production/Postate
2 X 3 Boards
Fads Sheet Printing (1200)
Facts Sheet Postage and Mailing
Courier
Reproductlon Subtotal
ComputerApecial Equipment
Computer Time
Computer Subtotal
Miscellaneous
Document Translation
Other Miscellaneous Expenses
Miscellaneous Subtotal
Total
TravelSubtotal
Units
1q
)
1900
Cost
300.00 S
52.00 s
250.00 s
3.00 sI
s0.00 s
0.s0 s
0.7s s
2s.00 s
1,500.00 s
2s0.00 s
4,500.00
780.00
s00.00
1,073.50
18.00
6,871.50
300.00
600.00
750.00
100.00
91,7s0.00
s
1200
1000
4
s
1t
1,500.00
250.00
s1,7s0.00
Page 6
Bcrg.rABAM loc. Libor E3timd€
Clly of prsco - f€.slblllty for hterchrn*.5
Cnphtcr/ Prohct
caDD coo.dl6 0r TOTAL
DESCRIPTIOI{s 27t.1t s 22t.@ s ta5,63 J r&lru 5 tto:u s ttt.tg s t0a.e8
l.o PiOIECT MAN €EM€|tT
18 6a 4l 9C
1.2 r Prol.ers Reoorts and Eillinr
Monthly Protrerr a.po.ts 16 mar)
Mo.$t hvoicinr (6 m.x)6l u
6l 24
M..tini Aslndas (8 mar)
Me.tlna Anendanre lE m.r 5 P.3/2 V.nl 46
Meeilng Note5 (6 m.x)6l 72
52 64
1.4 Projc.tAdmini*rarion
Pro,ecr Adminrrtr.tio.201 t04
counciloderm$ (2 Max- 2 Pas) -18
92 t22
4C 5C
12 5t
1.5
Prepare Prcie.t S.hedule 2Q 2E
OnSoins schedule Tr.clint and Malntenrnce 12 24 3e
64
TA5I( HOUR u 256 92
'11
422
9 tE00 9 55,73r I 13,398 S 662 s 56E s 5,225 |ao,aa5.t2
E0,500
SACI(GiOUND/DArA COtlECT|oN
27
Prep.r! topographlc ba3e map from .xistin3 GIS data 14
Pagc 7 or 16
B6E€rA8AM Inc. Labor Ertmd.
B.ra.rASAM 1...
OV of Pri.o - E.slblllty br Int.rcb.n..t
Entln..r/Grlphlc/
CADO TOTAL
5 2rt.4t 5 22160 , ra5.6,t ro&08 5 tro.y S ttt.39 I toeu
2.2 Previour 5tudi€s a.d Reports
Revlew Backround Studier 110 max)1 128a.rtloond stody Coordination Me€rina {4 ma)( - 4 Remote)
coodin.n9n M.etin6 Mi.ut€i {4 mrtl
Subfotdl 28 0 2e
2.3
2.4 CollectAi4lgeo.DData{Optionat)
Reva€wTr.vel Model OD C
Rdiewilev oD Data and 5ury1q4e for lfvet laodel
. MHOUIs :t{s r.ros il:z a i.n7,5t5
S 9.r@
3.1 lfthnicalAdvEoryCommine;Slppo.r
Me€ting as€lla and Pre!?ration (a rnar)
Me€tlns AJte.d.nce {4 m.t , 2 Oty/2 Va.)22
Me€tins Notes (4 mdx)
Ierm chad€ing lerh l!4emorand!!
Subfotol
28
10€
b(ecutlve Comm itt.9 Support
Meetint Agend.r.nd pre5ent.rion3 (, m.l
._ Meetint Ah.ndanc. (2 mar.2 pasl
Me€t|.t Not.t12 m.r)
0l 24
TASX NOUiS 60 62 t0s 13,291 s 9,029 $ 1,0!9 23,414
24,4
Pao! 8 or 15
BergBrAEAlV hc. Labor Estimsto
rqc9!1341rr.!!.
Oty of Prsco - F!.rlbillty i.r ht.rchmrei (TDD I r.;rct
TOIALs 27t.41 s 22t.a,t t45.63 s IOE.OE s ttatl 5 ttt.39 s toa,aaI.O ]2oIUTiAVE! O€MAND MODEUNG
4,1 l6FCOGCoordination
Methods and Ariumptions Memorandu;
DeveloD 2040 Land Ur€ scenariot
MeetinsAgenda and tr.pararion {3 max)
M€etil3 Attendance (3 max. t pas/2 Remote)
M€etlns Notes {3 marl
suoiirot
1t
4.2 Review .nd Asress Traflic Modelint
Trav.l oemand Model Focui Are. Refi nements
Travel pemand Model sysren perfo!!t;nce t\4€asures
5ruoy rnreriecnon anos!gment P.rtorm..te Mei
r.r .rxistins ana rutu; 8as;tin;6;;ionr Lepoa
Draft aristing and Futvrc Ba!etine Condr1lons Repon
Fin.rcilrinS a.d luture B.ietinc conditio.s ReDo(
SubTotot
TASXHOURS 351 0l 43s 7,7*I E71 4,527
8,6{'
5.0 AITERNATNESEVATUATION
iJ roenrly r.ret*oii=iniri-rrternati,es
rrepare euiro rrte,naliveiower6iiiii$G6iiatenars 241 801 24 12€roen(rc.I|on or Atr€rn.fl v.! and Br.instorming 5esston t6l 241 40
o 1U 0 24 o r6€
nefi ne r,tawork atternativesle miiF 8l 601 92ul.n Nctwork Evatuation Rero.t al
Reli3ed Draft Network Evaluatton Report 2lrtel oraft ttetwork Evair:ationiiooF 2l
0 o 60 o 24 o 100_-.Tl'
0l lsl ol i|l 2689-s 12,410 5 t7,r25 5,317 35.!|t2
Pagc 9 of 16
Srre.rABAM Inc. L.bor E.lim.t
l!qi!!l.aM l!!,
(IDDCity of Prro - Fr.rlblllw ior Int.r.h.m..Prlnclorl TOIAr.
DE9CSTPTOX s 2rLat s 221.60 t ta5.6t J ,O&mt t ttav s ttt.:E 3 totu
t.0 PUStlcItvoLv€MEtvI
Public Involv.ment Pl.n
2
t0 1l
34 39
6.2
Op.n l.loure Planniff Me€tinrs 12 mar - 2 P.t 16 56
G.aphicr.nd Eoardc (5 maxp€. meetins)48
Open Houie Anendance (2 max)10 10 30
Revilw Op€n HouieMe€ti.t Notes (2 max)
Subfoto 10 94 14C
IA5( HOURS 10 12t ,79
Con s|lbiotrts:I 1,35?s tp1?t 1,4t5 5 14,t43
Roid;t i 2!p]!s 2a.9m
,,o CO'I EsTIMATE
7 .7 Prelimin.ry coit Ertim.t€ for Atternitiv€t
Preliminary Cost Ectimate for Altern ativ$ (6 hax)5t
12 0 o 56
r..f;.i#;Hl tua rtot a.sis
,2
t 1,291 3-!s-!
t.o093-
5 8,000
TOTAL PiO,lCr BOUiI 19 4E1 zlz 180 134 54 55 1,145
Peg.10 of 16
EXHIBIT G-1 : Subcontract WorUFee Determination
gubcoruultant Analyslr of Co'ts. Dl(s Alsochtes
Direct Salarv Cost {DSC)
!EB!.OINE|- .. - xours , p?ynate , cost
I rarrc rnSr rasx Leaoer 246 557.70 S 16,502
SenlorTransp Englneer
Transp Englneer
VISSIM ModellngSpecialist
Transp EngrAssistant
SupporVGraphlcs
Admin
Direct Salary Cost Total
Salary Escalatlon (see escalation tab)
Overhead Cost
Net Fee
Reimbursables
Travel/Parklng
Reproduction/Postage
Computer/Special Equtpment
Mlscellaneou5
102 9s0.49 s,1so302 534,62 10,4ss
4 540,39 762
496
56
0
t77.70%
30.00%
48,988
565.81
87,759
r52,778
7,790
27,790
179,368
s27.47 13,s9ss28,85 L,6L6
s26.45 1,508
of DSC S
of DSC 14,866
suEToTAL s
suBToTAr 5
roTAr s
20,000
EXHIBIT G.1
DKS Associates Reimbursable Estimate
DKS Assoclates
Reimbursables
Travel/ParklnS
Airline Travel
Hotel
Per Diem
Miles
Zipcar
Reproductlon/Postage
Repruduction
TravelSubtotal
Reproduction Subtotal
Computer/Sp€cial Equipment
Computer Subtotal
Miscellaneous
Traffic O-D Data
Mlscellaneous Subtotal
Units
ls s 300.00 5ls s 90.00 s1s s s2.00 s
) u.)o) )8 s 70.00 s
s
4,500.00
1,350.00
780.00
560.00
7,r90.(m
So.oo
20,000.00 s 20,000.00
)-
s20,odr.m
( rnl1 c
s
Page 12
oKg Arrocirb3 L.bor E.tmrt
I-
iclqoj P.sco - Feaitbitityfor Int€l4inte5
rnfna Ent
!{!!dlns trr.it5
s;'rioa i triiip
J.!i3p +-.!r!!'!.r
VEsiM -
!!od..li4!.
s ta6.95
Trnrp En&
ssppg!.V- gs !N,68
TOlAr.s tt&59 s t03.8t S 86.15 3 ,r.r3
1.0
'ROJICT
MAI{AGEMENT
!.2 M9!!t!Lt9gr!S!.!on! andqrlq'r
Monrhly Proar$5 R.ponj {5 mar}
Monrhlr hvolcltq]!4q)
subfotol 1E 24
Me.tint Agendas {8 marl _
MeeinE Nrcno.nc. t5 lhar - 5 pas/2 v..t 5€5€M.€tjng Notlr 18 m.x)
7A 0 8{
1.4 Proj.ct administritio.
Project Admlni9tr.tion
Cou.cilBnefinss (2 Max - 2 P.t 2t
2C 2t
Phff.2 s.opilg
Or.ft Pha5e 2 ScoDa
Fln.l Phase 2 Scope 2C
SubTotol 20
. r4!! H!V!!
C6t 3ubi6r.l.r 11!i 2r,.0lt iir I r.ou t'ot t3s r.otr 3
ta5
s 24.030.83t ra,@o
.0 oar co[EcTtoN
Pr€p.re topoghph ic bale map from existhctSdara 11M.p orerirt'ns untiti€r vi. Grs a.a uatd;E-;;Gni
SubT 0 0 1l
2.2 Previols Studier.nd i€portt
R€vi€w Backtround Studie! 110 max)I
E.clsround Sludy C.ordinaion M.eting{a met-4 Remote)
Coordination M€.rlng Mtnut€3 (,t m.r)
0 0 it{
Peg. 13 ot 16
OKS A!.oci.bt L.bor E3tim!L
o:scrrt
l
loty or P.rco . F..sibilityl!944€rchanr€!
rytot{
T-ticEirr
Llr Lrq!15 "r,its
ISlTPs t58 69
I rr.;.p
- !4d!!.13 to&tt
vtSstM
!!!d!b!s 125.95
l imsetn3r
1-s.- u.is TqIAIs"!!e@s to.6t Nq!!hs E,t32.3
t2 15
2,4 collgqt al4lge GD o.t. {oplionat)
Review Travel Mod.t OD o.ta
29lBei.w New Oo 01ta.nd Summanze for rravetMod?l 6€sublotal 5 1t 28 40 0 91
TAS|( 80URS IE 26 rto f2
con Sr I 3,2521 I 4t2A s a,352 t 5,20!249 1t,551
rl,50o
relsrntv) rlurlo|n5
hnic.l Advirory committe. suppo.t
Meetini A€end. and Prep.. pn (4 m.r)
38Me.tng attcnd..c e {4 mar - 2 Otyl2 v.n}
38MeetlnS Notes (4 m!x)
Team ChanerinB Terh Memorandum
7t
Mec( ng Age.oar and pr€senratrons (2 max)2l
Meetint Att€ndaft. (2 m.r.2 pas)201 21Meeuns Nore! (2 !n.x)
22)42
TA5( HOURS 51,1ltCon subtor:9 9,n5E 9 r,!55 2,611 S 1,0{s r25 g a99 5 15.794
4.1
Methods .nd A53umpriont Memorrnoum
-
-l 5l 17Oevelop 2O4O t.nd U3c s.en 5l
M€etln8 Aa.nda and Pr.orr.tion t3 m.rl
-f
vcet,ng rnenaince o max -lliTiemo-re)-201 4NMeeting Notes (3 m.)
__ --
s,proEit ol ol 56 ol t21
Pag.'14 ot 16
OKS AssocieEs L.bor E3timats
Pag6 15 ot 16
oKS Atrocilt t L.bor Estimot.
l
lcityol P.sco - F..sibititv for Inierchant€r
ITION
" s!n|o| I Ii p--
t..n3p Enain!.t
i tsiiii s toelr
vtsstM
Uqd!!ilr
rr..rp En3r
&{q!Ls tt.ts
s'rpport/q
I 90.580EscRtls itt.ii TO'AL
s 125.95 t st.tt
TASKHOURI zc 0 0 zc
4,527 5 5 s
T^5{ HOU85 0.
s 3 .
TOTAL PRO'ECT HOUi!2E5 102 302 496 56 1,303
Peg.la of 18