HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018.04.09 Council Workshop PacketWorkshop Meeting
AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
6:30 p.m.
April 9, 2018
Page
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:
4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
3 (a) Land Use Planning Short Course
4 - 6 (b) Housing Authority Commission Interviews
Council to conduct brief interviews with David Danilyuk, Brian Griffith and
Jacqueline Toroni
7 (c) Retail Recruitment and Trade Area Analysis
(d) Benton-Franklin County Health District Update
Presented by Rick Dawson, Senior Manager Surveillance and Investigation,
Benton-Franklin County Health District
(e) Police Department Support Services Presentation
Presented by Brent Cook, Police Captain
8 - 15 (f) Comprehensive Plan Update (MF # CPA 2018-001)
16 - 17 (g) Primary Clarifier Performance Testing Results Presentation
18 - 21 (h) Professional Services Agreement with PACE Engineers, Inc. for the
17003 Columbia East Lift Station and Force Main Project
22 - 26 (i) Professional Services Agreement for the Design of Peanuts Park
Renovation Project
5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
Page 1 of 26
Workshop Meeting April 9, 2018
6. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
7. ADJOURNMENT.
REMINDERS:
1. 11:45 a.m., Monday, April 9, Pasco Red Lion - Pasco Chamber of Commerce
Membership Luncheon. (Guest Speaker, Senator Mark Schoesler)
2. 6:00 p.m., Monday, April 9, Conference Room #1 - Old Fire Pension Board
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MATT WATKINS, Rep.; CRAIG MALONEY,
Alt.)
3. 5:45 p.m., Wednesday, April 11, Kennewick City Hall - Tri-Cities Regional Public
Facilities District Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS,
COUNCILMEMBERS CRAIG MALONEY and SAUL MARTINEZ)
4. 7:00 a.m., Thursday, April 12, Cousin's Restaurant, Pasco - BFCG Tri-Mats Policy
Advisory Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER RUBEN ALVARADO,
Rep.; PETE SERRANO, Alt.)
5. 7:00 p.m., Thursday, April 12, Transit Facility - Ben-Franklin Transit Board
Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER RUBEN
ALVARADO, Alt.)
6. 1:00 p.m., Friday, April 13, Volunteer Park, Arbor Day Celebration. (MAYOR
MATT WATKINS; ALL COUNCILMEMBERS INVITED TO ATTEND)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and
streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance.
Page 2 of 26
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 3, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/9/18
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Land Use Planning Short Course
I. REFERENCE(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The April 9th Council Workshop will include a presentation highlighting some of the
material contained in the established "Land Use Planning Short Course" Program
sponsored by the Washington State Department of Commerce.
The regular Short Course Program last approximately 3 hours - so Spokane attorney,
Mike Connelly (well known land use attorney, author and contributor to the Short
Course Program) will provide Council an abbreviated primer on State land use laws
and the project permitting process. The standard 2018 Short Course Program is being
offered in the region, however it is scheduled during a regular City Council meeting.
Staff will make arrangements for those Councilmembers desirous of attending the
standard Short Course Program at a more convenient time.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 3 of 26
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 3, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/9/18
FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: Housing Authority Commission Interviews
I. REFERENCE(S):
Resolution No. 3388
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council to conduct brief interviews with David Danilyuk, Brian Griffith and Jacqueline
Toroni
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Housing Authority is a separate municipal corporation governed by its appointed
board of directors. The Authority’s basic mission is to provide safe and habitable
housing for households with incomes below 80% of the regional medium household
income. In the case of the Pasco Housing Authority, it owns and operates about 300
housing units in Pasco and offers other housing opportunities as other federal programs
are made available and deemed appropriate by the Board.
A Joint Housing Authority for the City of Pasco and Franklin County was formed in
1981 by joint Resolution. The Housing Authority Board is comprised of five
Commissioners who are appointed for a term of office of five years. The
Commissioners for Position Nos. 1 and 3 are selected by the Franklin County
Commissioners. Likewise, the Commissioners for Position Nos. 2, 4 and 5 are selected
by the Pasco City Council, and must reside within the City.
There is one vacant position whose term has expired:
1. Position No. 2 (vacant) . . . . . . . . . . Expired 1/28/18
Page 4 of 26
After Council screening committee review of all applications, the following have been
selected to interview for possible appointment to Position No. 2:
1. David Danilyuk
2. Brian Griffith
3. Jacqueline Toroni
V. DISCUSSION:
After conduct of interviews at the April 9 Workshop meeting, it is proposed that an
appropriate appointment be made by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the Council
at the April 16 Business meeting.
Page 5 of 26
RESOLUTION NO. `
A RESOLUTION Providing a Process for Appointments to City Boards and
Commissions.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco maintains several citizen advisory boards to assist the delivery of
municipal services as well as to advise the City Council in making various policy decisions; and
WHEREAS, the appointment process prescribed by the Pasco Municipal Code requires the Mayor
to appoint citizens to vacancies on such boards, subject to confirmation of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council desire to establish an appointment process which is more
collaborative yet efficient for both the applicants and City Council alike;NOW,THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DOES RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Applications for city boards and commissions shall be solicited annually by the City
Manager on behalf of the City Council.
Section 2: All applications received by the City Manager shall be reviewed by a City Council
committee appointed by the Mayor; such committee, to be known as the "Appointment Screening
Committee," shall be ad-hoc, appointed annually, and consist of three members, including the Mayor. The
Appointment Screening Committee shall select those applicants it deems best suited for the respective
board/commission but not more than three applicants for each vacancy to be filled. The Appointment
Screening Committee shall consider the following factors in making their selections for further
consideration:
a) Geographic representation;
b) Gender representation;
c) Ethnic representation;
d) Familial and financial relationships of board members
Section 3: Those applicants selected by the Appointment Screening Committee shall be
interviewed by the City Council during a public meeting; provided, however, the Screening Committee may
recommend reappointment of an incumbent applicant without interview by the City Council if the incumbent
has •-- • - - -•served not more than two consecutive•
terms since the last interview. At a City Council meeting following such interview, an interviewed candidate
shall be selected by the Mayor for appointment to each vacancy. Any candidate selected by the Mayor shall
be subject to confirmation vote of the City Council; a majority vote of the quorum present at such meeting
shall be required to confirm the Mayor's appointments.
Section 4: Any prior resolutions of the City Council in conflict with the provisions of this
resolution shall be superseded by this resolution.
PAS D by the City Council ity of Pasco at its regular meeting this 16th day of April, 2012.
Matt Watkins, Mayor
T T: f APP'S AS TO FORM:
Debra Clark,City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Page 6 of 26
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 2, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/9/18
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Retail Coach Presentation - Recruitment and Analysis
I. REFERENCE(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City has enlisted the services of The Retail Coach - a highly regarded professional
analysis, marketing and recruitment company specializing in a variety of services that
enable a community to expand its impact on attracting retail commercial development.
These services include determining both the local and regional trade area belonging to
Pasco, analyzing the trade area leakages, identifying the community demographics,
identifying appropriate retail prospects and assisting with recruitment efforts associated
with those prospects.
Aaron Farmer, Senior Vice President at The Retail Coach will provide Council a
summary of their efforts and focus for Pasco and an explanation of the strategy heading
into the yearly recruitment effort at the International Conference of Shopping Centers
this coming May.
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 7 of 26
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 2, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
Workshop Meeting: 4/9/18
FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan Update (MF # CPA 2018-001)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Brief on Comprehensive Plans and Related Matters
OFM Population Projections
Draft Land Use Map and Urban Growth Boundary
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires most cities in the State to develop
Comprehensive Plans for guiding urban development. The City’s original GMA plan
was adopted by the City Council in August of 1995. The plan is required by State law
to be periodically updated. Pasco's plan was last updated in 2008 and must be updated
again this year.
Based on statutory requirements, Pasco’s plan must include Elements (Chapters)
dealing with land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, transportation, economic
development, and parks. The City’s plan must also address the siting of essential public
facilities, shorelines, resource lands, critical areas and develop a public participation
process.
Page 8 of 26
Once adopted, the Plan is implemented through application of the zoning and
subdivision regulations and other related development regulations. The attached
Comprehensive Plan Brief provides a further examination of the Comprehensive Plan
and related processes.
V. DISCUSSION:
While all of the Plan Elements are important the Land Use Element is a key because it
provides direction for future development related to housing, commerce and industry.
The Land Use Element, including the Land Use map sets the future direction for the
physical development of the City.
The preparation of the Comprehensive Plan is guided by population estimated provided
to Franklin County by the Office of Financial Management (OFM) for Franklin
County. Eighty percent of the County estimate is assigned to Pasco. As a result Pasco
must plan for another 50,148 residents by 2038. Planning for 50,148 additional
residential in the next 20 years will require significant changes to the City's Urban
Growth Boundary and Land Use Map. The City will need to amend the Comprehensive
Plan to accommodate the significant increase in population and the corresponding
increase in dwelling units.
Staff will be available during the workshop of April 9th to provide an explantaion of
the Comprehensive Plan and to review the initial work that has been completed on the
Land Use Map and UGA expansion proposal.
Page 9 of 26
Brief on Comprehensive Plans and Related Matters
The information provided herein is intended to provide a “rule of thumb” guideline and
background discussion for Council members for an understanding of the Comprehensive
Plan, project review and the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
The Comprehensive Plan
Comprehensive plans are the centerpiece of local planning efforts. A comprehensive plan
articulates a series of goals, objectives, policies, actions, and standards that are
intended to guide the day-to-day decisions of elected officials and local government
staff.
Land Use Element
While all of these elements are important, the land use element sets the direction of
future growth in a community and is usually depicted as a future land use map. The
future land use map, which is policy-oriented, is then implemented in large part by the
official zoning map, a regulatory tool.
Since these maps are so closely linked, a zoning change cannot be approved unless it is
consistent with the future land use map.
Essential Public Facilities
Each comprehensive plan must also address “essential public facilities” that are typically
difficult to site, which are usually included in the land use element. By statute (RCW
36.70A.200), essential public facilities include:
Airports
State education facilities
State or regional transportation facilities (defined in RCW 47.06.140)
State and local correctional facilities
Solid waste handling facilities
Inpatient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities,
group homes, and secure community transition facilities (defined in RCW
71.09.020)
Regional transit authority facilities (defined in RCW 81.112.020)
No local comprehensive plan or development regulation may preclude the siting of
essential public facilities (RCW 36.70A.200). Cities and counties must develop criteria for
siting essential public facilities (see also WAC 365-196-550 and WAC 365-196-570).
It should be noted that such facilities do not necessarily have to be owned or operated by a
public entity, as long as they provide a public service (for example, a solid waste transfer
station).
Coordination with Neighboring Jurisdictions
A city or county must coordinate its comprehensive plan with any other cities or counties
with which it shares a common border (RCW 36.70A.100). To facilitate this, counties, in
Page 10 of 26
cooperation with cities within their boundaries, are responsible for establishing
countywide planning policies that establish a framework for where population growth
and infrastructure investment will be directed within a region (RCW 36.70A.210). Note
that these countywide policies and decisions do not alter the land use powers of cities.
Implementation
The GMA places a strong emphasis on implementation, and the goals in a
comprehensive plan cannot be achieved without strong regulatory and financial support
(such as zoning, capital spending, and non-capital spending).
Current Planning and Project Permitting
In 1995, the Growth Management Act was substantially amended to provide for
regulatory reform. ESHB 1724 made significant changes to three of the State’s core
land use laws: GMA, State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Shoreline Management
Act (SMA). The primary goal of this reform was to establish comprehensive plans and
development regulations as the foundation for land use decisions. This was in response
to conflicting development regulations – particularly in the I-5 corridor communities –
that did not provide certainty in development review and land use decisions. As a result
of ESHB 1724, jurisdictions that are fully planning under GMA (such as Franklin County
and Pasco) needed to develop specific requirements for integrated project review. In
other words, the fundamental land use decisions made during the comprehensive plan
process are not to be readdressed or reexamined at individual project level review. It
also means that Pasco:
Combines both procedural and substantive environmental review with project
permit review;
Allows no more than one open record hearing and not more than one closed
record appeal hearing on both the permit and environmental review, except for
appeals of a SEPA determination of significance.
If the proposed project has been analyzed through the SEPA review process at a prior
stage of permitting – say the zoning process – it will not be reanalyzed by additional
SEPA review. However, most projects that require action before a permit application can
be submitted (such as a rezone) will not contain enough information to accurately
provide an environmental analysis. In those cases, additional SEPA review will occur at
the permit application stage. This eliminates guesswork and allows the scope of the project
to be assessed in a consistent and objective manner.
SEPA
The State Environmental Policy Act is intended to make sure that environmental values
are considered during decision-making. SEPA applies to all levels of government within
Washington State. It was first adopted in 1971 and provides Washington State’s basic
environmental framework. SEPA is intended to provide information to decision makers
Page 11 of 26
and the public so that the development of environmentally sound proposals is
encouraged. Under SEPA, the “environment” has a very broad meaning. It not only
means physical environment but the social and economic environment. It is intended
that information on the environment be used by decision makers to decide whether to
approve, approve with conditions or deny a proposal. SEPA is an administrative tool
used to focus on impacts that have not been addressed by our development regulations
and to:
Avoid adverse environmental impacts
Mitigate adverse environmental impacts
Prepare an environmental impact statement when such impacts cannot be
avoided or mitigated.
In Pasco, the optional SEPA process is used. This streamlines project review. Almost
always, site-specific impacts can only be addressed through SEPA at the project level as
discussed above. In these cases, SEPA is a safety net for those impacts that cannot be
easily anticipated in plans and regulations. The optional SEPA process also provides the
flexibility to address site-specific impacts as opposed to creating reams of rules and
regulations to take into account all possible development scenarios.
Legal Issues
Quasi-judicial action
If you are evaluating a specific case or proposal submitted by an individual party, you
are acting in a quasi-judicial capacity. A good example of this is a proposed change of
zone on a particular parcel of land, review of a subdivision application or consideration
of a special use permit. In these cases, you are being asked to make a decision that
affects an individual and likely nearby properties but not the entire community. When
you are dealing with individual actions of a quasi-judicial nature, you are held to very
high levels of scrutiny. The appearance of fairness doctrine comes to play in all quasi-
judicial actions. The appearance of fairness doctrine states that when you are acting in
a quasi-judicial role you must not only be fair in fact, but must appear fair to an average
person. This is easy for you to discern for yourself if you ask this question: Would a
disinterested person - apprised of the totality of my interest or involvement in the
matter before the Council - be reasonably justified in thinking that my involvement
might affect my judgment in this decision?
Appearance of Fairness Doctrine
The appearance of fairness doctrine can be complicated as an elected official. In Pasco
it can be a particular problem because the community (relatively speaking) is small
enough that you enjoy relationships with friends and neighbors that occur in unexpected
situations (like the grocery store checkout line). The key to complying with the
Page 12 of 26
appearance of fairness doctrine is that you must not engage in ex parte
communications. Ex parte communications are communications that occur “off the
record” and have the appearance of influencing your final vote on a project or
application. This doesn’t look fair. The appearance of fairness doctrine says that your
actions must not only be fair in fact, but must appear fair as well. When you listen to
thoughts of acquaintances that are outside of a regular meeting for something you will
consider officially as a council member, you are engaging in ex parte communications.
So what do you do when someone grabs your arm at the grocery store checkout line
and lobbies you to deny a new subdivision? It’s very simple - you explain to your
acquaintance that you cannot continue the conversation; and at the meeting that the
proposal is being considered, you announce any written or oral ex parte communications
you have had. If you feel that regardless of this communication you will still be able to
render a fair decision, you need to state that for the record. If you are challenged, you
need to step down for the duration of the discussion. If you don’t, you have left yourself
and the Council open for a legal challenge. Disclosure of ex parte communication
doesn’t necessarily mean you will not be able to stay and participate. However - the
best course of action when challenged is to step down and leave the room - you will not
be able to take a seat in the audience.
Concurrency
Concurrency is one of the goals of the GMA and refers to the timely provision of public
facilities and services relative to the demand for them. To maintain concurrency means
that adequate public facilities are in place to serve new development as it occurs or
within a specified time period. The GMA gives special attention to concurrency for
transportation. The GMA requires that transportation improvements or strategies to
accommodate development impacts need to be made concurrently with land
development. “Concurrent with the development” is defined by the GMA to mean that
any needed "improvements or strategies are in place at the time of development, or that
a financial commitment is in place to complete the improvements or strategies within six
years." RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b). Local governments have flexibility regarding how to apply
concurrency within their plans, regulations, and permit systems.
Once a jurisdiction sets a Level of Service Standard (LOS), it is used to determine
whether the impacts of a proposed development can be met through existing capacity
and/or to decide what level of additional facilities will be required. Transportation is the
only area of concurrency that specifies denial of development if LOS standards cannot
be met. However, local jurisdictions must have a program to correct existing deficiencies
and bring existing transportation facilities and services up to locally adopted standards.
A developer may not be required to pay for improvements to correct existing
deficiencies.
Local jurisdictions may adopt a concurrency mechanism for other public facilities that are
deemed necessary for development. WAC 365-196-840(2). These other facilities may
include parks and recreational facilities, sanitary sewer systems, stormwater facilities,
and schools.
Page 13 of 26
Pasco Population Projections based on 80% of the
OFM Population Projections for Franklin County
Year Low Medium High
2020 70,114 79,770 93,109
2025 76,486 91,025 112,931
2030 82,466 101,954 132,493
2035 89,8970 114,470 153,705
2038 94,306 121,828 166.052
2040 93,311 158,574 174,830
Page 14 of 26
II‘EMUUBG_PASCOOPEN_SPACE_PARKSDNR_RESERVEAVRPOWLRESERVEGOVERNMENT_PUBL\CLOW_DENS\TY_RES\DENT\ALM\><ED_RES\DENT\ALH!GH_DENS\TY_RES\DENT!ALMW><ED_RES\DENT\AL_COMMERC\ALCOMMERCWALVNDUSTRWALDRAFTLANDUSE&UGAMAP(2018)Page 15 of 26
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 2, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Steve Worley, PW Director
Workshop Meeting: 4/9/18
FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer
Public Works
SUBJECT: Primary Clarifier Performance Testing Results Presentation
I. REFERENCE(S):
PC Testing Power Point Presentation
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Presentation Only
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
In 2015-17, the City of Pasco improved operating capabilities at the Pasco Wastewater
Treatment Plant through the addition of Primary Clarifiers (PC) 3 and 4. HDR
Engineering (HDR) was responsible for the engineering design. As a final step the City
requested that HDR design and perform an objective testing regime to determine the
performance of PC 3 and 4.
With the development of a Facilities Plan and Engineering Report for the Wastewater
Treatment Plant (WWTP) underway, it is important that the report accurately reflect
the capacity of this critical plant component.
V. DISCUSSION:
The results of the engineering analysis reveal that the recently completed PC 3 and 4
are capable of operating in excess of design capacity. Primary treatment to the WWTP
will be sufficient beyond the 2031 loading projections.
Page 16 of 26
HDR Engineering's representative Tom Helgeson, PE will present a summary of the
results of the final performance capacity test of Primary Clarifiers (PC) 3 and 4.
Page 17 of 26
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 2, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Steve Worley Public Works Director
Workshop Meeting: 4/9/18
FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer
Public Works
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with PACE Engineers, Inc. for the 17003
Columbia East Lift Station and Force Main Project
I. REFERENCE(S):
Vicinity Map
Professional Services Agreement Summary
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Washington State Department of Commerce Grant - $559,393.20
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Columbia East Lift Station and Force Main Project was identified in the 2018-
2023 Capital Improvement Plan as 17003 Kahlotus Hwy Sewer Force Main. The sewer
force main and lift station will transport food processor's wastewater from the vicinity
of Commercial Avenue and Pasco-Kahlotus Highway intersection, north-westerly to
the City’s Process Water Reuse Facility located off Foster Wells Road. The project
will provide for this area's current and future processors, as well as diverting industrial
loading from the Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The lift station and force main improvements are part of a larger set of improvements
to increase treatment capacity and service area of the Process Water Reuse Facility.
The City has received an award of $2,575,000 in the 2016 Washington State Capital
Budget for this project, as well as a low interest HAIFC loan, .09 monies from Franklin
County, and is working with the U.S, Economic Development Agency on a grant of
approximately $2.5 million.
Page 18 of 26
V. DISCUSSION:
A Request for Qualifications was distributed to solicit prospective design consultants.
A Consultant Selection Committee comprised of City staff, reviewed and scored the
submittals ultimately, selecting PACE Engineering, Inc. as the most qualified.
PACE will provide design services, right-of-way acquisition and assistance through the
bidding process for the project. The fee for the work is not to exceed the sum of
$559,393.20 and the final design of the project will be submitted by Fall of 2018.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed Professional Services Agreement with
PACE Engineering, Inc.
Page 19 of 26
Professional Services Agreement
(Summary Sheet)
Project: Professional Services Agreement for design of the 17003 Columbia East Lift Station
and Force Main Project
Consultant: PACE Engineering, Inc.
Address: 11255 Kirkland Way, Suite 300 Kirkland, WA 98033
Scope of Services: Design, geotechnical exploration, topographic survey and necessary Right
of Way acquisition for the 17003 Columbia East Lift Station and Force Main. Agreement
includes assistance during bidding process.
Term: Completion Date: December 31, 2019
Payments to Consultant:
Amount Not to Exceed: $559,393.20
Insurance to be Provided:
1. Commercial General Liability:
☐ $1,000,000 each occurrence;
☐ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or
☒ $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate
2. Professional Liability:
☒ $1,000,000 per claim;
☒ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or
☐ $________ per claim; and $________ per policy aggregate limit
Other Information:
Signature by:
☐ Mayor
☒ City Manager
Page 20 of 26
17003 Columbia East Lift Station and Force Main Vicinity Map
Page 21 of 26
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 2, 2018
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Steve Worley, Public Works Director
Workshop Meeting: 4/9/18
FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer
Public Works
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with KPG, Inc. for the 16014 Peanuts Park
Renovation Project
I. REFERENCE(S):
Vicinity Map
Professional Services Agreement Summary
Preliminary Design Concept of Completed Park
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Community Development Block Grant: $669,724
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Peanuts Park is centrally located in downtown Pasco and is a focal point of the area.
The restoration of the park is a key element to the revitalization and redevelopment of
downtown Pasco. The park as we know it today will be demolished and a new park
plan will be put in place for the area. The final project will include the installation of
features such as shade structures, new trees, furniture, green space, restrooms, and a
renovated farmers market pavilion.
Last year, KPG, Inc. completed a Master Plan for Peanuts Park that outlines the
described renovations.
V. DISCUSSION:
A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was distributed to solicit prospective design
Page 22 of 26
consultants. A Consultant Selection Committee comprised of City staff reviewed and
scored the submittals ultimately selecting KPG, Inc. as the most qualified.
KPG, Inc. will provide design services and minor construction support for the project.
The fee for the work is not to exceed the sum of $669,724 and the final design of the
project will be submitted by Fall of 2018.
Staff recommends approval of the Professional Services Agreement with KPG, Inc.
Page 23 of 26
PEANUTS PARK VICINITY MAPPage 24 of 26
Professional Services Agreement
(Summary Sheet)
Project: Professional Services Agreement for the Peanuts Park Project
Consultant: KPG, Inc.
Address: 3131 Elliot Ave. Ste 400, Seattle, WA 98121
Scope of Services: Creation of a design for the Peanuts Park Restoration Project based off the
Master plan. The design should revitalize the downtown Pasco area by creating a more inviting
space in Peanuts Park with increased lighting, pedestrian accessibility and space, and renewed
energy to the architecture.
Term: Completion Date: June 30, 2019
Payments to Consultant:
Amount Not to Exceed: $669,724
Insurance to be Provided:
1. Commercial General Liability:
☐ $1,000,000 each occurrence;
☐ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or
☒ $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate
2. Professional Liability:
☒ $1,000,000 per claim;
☒ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or
☐ $________ per claim; and $________ per policy aggregate limit
Other Information:
Signature by:
☐ Mayor ☒ City Manager
Page 25 of 26
Page 26 of 26