HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017.11.06 Council Meeting PacketRegular Meeting
AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m.
November 6, 2017
Page
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered
to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion
(in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If
further discussion is desired by Council members or the public, the item may be
removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered
separately.
4 - 10 (a) Approval of Minutes
To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated October
16, 2017 and the Special Meeting dated October 30, 2017.
11 - 12 (b) Bills and Communications
To approve claims in the total amount of $4,462,502.61 ($2,145,926.43 in
Check Nos. 218718-219041; $918,329.59 in Electronic Transfer Nos.
817996-818134, 818141-818193, 818195-818429, 818493-818495;
$72,406.68 in Check Nos. 51155-51234; $1,325,839.91 in Electronic
Transfer Nos. 30112907-30113908).
13 - 37 (c) DAHP Grant for Survey of African American Properties in Pasco (MF#
HIST 2017-002)
To authorize the City Manager to execute the Washington State Department
of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Grant Contract.
38 - 40 (d) Tourism Promotion Area
To approve the 2018 Marketing Plan and Operating Budget for the Tourism
Promotion Area in the total amount of $1,421,663.
41 - 47 (e) * Dedication Deed: Right-of-Way for a Portion of Burns Rd (MF#
DEED 2017-009)
To accept the deed from Leticia Rebolledo and Oscar Avalos for a portion of
Page 1 of 125
Regular Meeting November 6, 2017
the Burns Road right-of-way.
(RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
5. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: This item is provided to allow
citizens the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to
express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or
for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some
questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative
process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best
directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen
comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with
lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written
information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings.
6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
7. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO:
48 - 52 (a) 2018 Operating & Capital Projects Budget Ordinances - First Reading
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION: I move for the first reading of Ordinance No. 4362, for
consideration of the City of Pasco Annual Operating Budget for the Year
2018.
MOTION: I move for the first reading of Ordinance No. 4363, for
consideration of the City of Pasco Capital Projects Budget for the Year
2018.
8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS:
53 - 74 (a) Q* Rezone: Kidwell Rezone, I-1 to I-2 (MF# Z 2017-005)
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4364, rezoning Lot 4, Binding
Site Plan 2016-06 from I-1 (Light Industrial) to I-2 (Medium Industrial), and
further, authorize publication by summary only.
75 - 95 (b) Q* Special Permit: Church in a C-3 Zone (MF# SP 2017-012)
Page 2 of 125
Regular Meeting November 6, 2017
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3801, approving a special
permit for the location of a church in a C-3 zoning district at 3330 West
Court Street, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
96 - 125 (c) Q* Preliminary Plat: Preakness Ridge (MF# PP 2017-008)
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3802, approving the
Preliminary Plat for Preakness Ridge.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
10. NEW BUSINESS:
11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
13. ADJOURNMENT.
(RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
MF# “Master File #....”
REMINDERS:
1. 7:00 a.m., Thursday, November 9 – BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK,
Alt.)
2. 7:00 p.m., Thursday, November 9, Transit Facility - Ben-Franklin Transit Board
Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER CHI FLORES,
Alt.)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed
at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance.
Page 3 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 19, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Daniela Erickson, City Clerk
Administrative & Community Services
SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes
I. REFERENCE(S):
Minutes 10.16.17
Minutes 10.30.17
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated October 16, 2017 and
the Special Meeting dated October 30, 2017.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 4 of 125
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 16, 2017
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers present: Chi Flores, Rebecca Francik, Robert Hoffmann, Tom
Larsen, Saul Martinez, Matt Watkins and Al Yenney.
Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager;
Leland Kerr, City Attorney; Richard Terway, Interim Public Works Director;
Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Richa Sigdel,
Finance Director; Dan Dotta, Interim Administrative & Community Services
Director; Bob Metzger, Police Chief and Dave Hare, Assistant Fire Chief.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA:
Approval of Minutes
To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated October 2,
2017.
Bills and Communications
To approve claims in the total amount of $4,102,173.10 ($2,373,609.95 in
Check Nos. 218489-218717; $972,917.84 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 817983,
817987-817995, 818135-818137; $37,905.45 in Check Nos. 51112-51154;
$714,063.41 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30112405-30112906; $3,676.45 in
Electronic Transfer Nos. 404-409).
To approve bad debt write-off for Utility Billing, Ambulance, Cemetery,
General Accounts, Miscellaneous Accounts, and Municipal Court (non-
criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of
$277,191.08 and, of that amount, authorize $203,063.67 to be turned over for
collection.
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Recommendations
To approve the allocation of 2018 Lodging Tax receipts as recommended by
the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee as shown in the minutes of September
26, 2017.
National Citizen's Survey
To authorize staff to contract for the National Citizens Survey including
standard mail survey, Spanish and district-based geographic options, and to
include the three policy questions as discussed.
Removed from Consent Agenda and moved to Item 10a.
Accept Work - Reroof City Buildings
To approve Resolution No. 3800, accepting work performed by Elite
Construction and Development LLC for the City Buildings Reroof project.
Page 1 of 4 Page 5 of 125
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 16, 2017
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve the Consent Agenda as amended.
Mr. Yenney seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote.
PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
Presentation of Proclamation for "Community Media Day"
Mayor Watkins presented a Proclamation to Jon Funfar, Communications
Program Manager proclaiming October 20, 2017, "Community Media Day" in
the City of Pasco.
VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS:
Georgia Perkins, representing Kings Point Christian School, addressed Council
about the results of their recent Fire Inspection.
HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO:
Annexation: D&D Annexation (MF# ANX 2016-002)
Council and staff discussed the details of the proposed annexation.
Mayor Watkins declared the Public Hearing open to consider the proposed
annexation.
Following three calls for comments, and there being none, Mayor Watkins
declared the Public Hearing closed.
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4354, an Ordinance
relating to annexation and annexing certain real property to the City of Pasco
and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Yenney seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4355, an Ordinance of
the City of Pasco, Washington, assigning C-1 zoning to the D & D Annexation
Area as recommended by the Planning Commission and, further, authorize
publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS:
Central Business District Zoning Regulations
Council discussed the details of the proposed ordinance.
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4356, amending
Chapter 25.44 "Central Business District" of the Pasco Municipal Code, and
further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
Chronic Nuisance Ordinance
Council discussed the details of the proposed ordinance.
Page 2 of 4 Page 6 of 125
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 16, 2017
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4357, amending the
Pasco Municipal Code Section 9.63.020 "Definitions," and further authorize
publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
Code Amendment: Residential Design Standards Regarding False
Dormers & Flat Roofs (MF# CA 2017-004)
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4358, amending PMC
25.70.085, "Residential Design Standards," as recommended by the Planning
Commission; and further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Yenney
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Dog License Program Improvement
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4359, amending
Sections 8.02.190 “License - Dogs, Required”, 8.02.200 “License – Receipts
and Tags”, 8.02.210 “License Procedures – Receipts and Tags”, 8.02.230
“License – No Cost for Adopted Animals”, and 3.07.020 “Animal Control”
and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Yenney seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
Rezone: RS-12 to C-1 (MF# Z 2017-003)
Council and staff discussed the details of the proposed ordinance.
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4360, rezoning a
portion of the north half of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of the
northwest quarter of Section 22, Township 9 North, Range 29, East WM, from
RS-12 (Suburban Residential) to C-1 (Retail Business), and further, authorize
publication by summary only. Mr. Yenney seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
National Citizen's Survey
Council discussed the proposed survey questions.
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to authorize staff to contract for the National
Citizens Survey including standard mail survey, Spanish and district-based
geographic options, and to include the three policy questions as discussed. Mr.
Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
Mr. Zabell updated Council on the following:
• One of the previously auctioned DNR/Rd 68 properties which the
bidder defaulted, is up for auction again Nov. 14.
• There were 200 community visitors for the Fire Prevention Month Open
House at Station 82. The Fire Prevention Coordinator will train 3,000
third grader students this month.
• Wade Park to Ivy Glades Levee Lowering project public meeting will
be held at Chiawana High School on Oct. 18.
• Volunteers have completed installing Tee signs, baskets, bark and did
general cleanup at the Disc Golf Course.
• Annual Daddy-Daughter Dance will be held Oct. 21.
Page 3 of 4 Page 7 of 125
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 16, 2017
• Special Olympics Events are being coordinated at the City Hall Activity
Center.
• Diseased tree replacement on west side of City is complete.
• Heritage Tree Planting at Volunteer Park Oct. 20.
Mr. Flores commented on the new Disc Golf Course and noted the Ribbon
Cutting Ceremony will be on November 27.
Mr. Yenney noted the Police Department is still selling pink shoulder patches
as a fund raiser to support Cancer Awareness.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:47 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Matt Watkins, Mayor Daniela Erickson, City Clerk
PASSED and APPROVED this 6th day of November, 2017
Page 4 of 4 Page 8 of 125
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 30, 2017
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers present: Chi Flores, Rebecca Francik, Robert Hoffmann, Tom
Larsen, Saul Martinez, Matt Watkins and Al Yenney.
Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager;
Leland Kerr, City Attorney; Richard Terway, Interim Public Works Director;
Troy Hendren, Acting Community & Economic Development Director; Richa
Sigdel, Finance Director; Dan Dotta, Interim Administrative & Community
Services Director; Bob Metzger, Police Chief and Bob Gear, Fire Chief.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
BUDGET PRESENTATION:
2018 Preliminary Budget Presentation
Mr. Zabell, Mr. Strebel and Department Directors presented the 2018
Preliminary Budget for consideration. First Reading of the 2018 Budget and a
Public Hearing will be held at the November 6, 2017 Regular Meeting.
HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO:
2018 Ad Valorem Tax Levy
Council and Staff discussed the 2018 Ad Valorem Tax Levy.
Mayor Watkins declared the public hearing open to consider revenue sources for
the 2018 Budget and possible changes to the 2018 Ad Valorem Tax Levy.
Following three calls for comments, and there being none, Mayor Watkins
declared the Public Hearing closed.
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4361, providing for the
2018 Ad Valorem Tax Levy in the City of Pasco in accordance with State Law
and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
Bid Rejection: 2017 Trail Rehabilitation
Mr. Terway explained the details of the bid rejection.
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to reject all bids for the 2017 Trail Rehabilitation
Project because the low bid in the amount of $312,855.00 did not fall below the
small works threshold of $300,000. Mr. Yenney seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
Bid Award: 2017 Trail Rehabilitation
Page 1 of 2 Page 9 of 125
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 30, 2017
Council and staff discussed the details of the proposed project.
MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to award the Base Bid for the 2017 Trail
Rehabilitation Project to Road Products Inc. in the amount of $186,625.00 and,
further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents. Mr.
Yenney seconded. Motion carried 6-1. No - Larsen.
Mr. Yenney requested a discussion regarding Uber be placed on the November
27, 2017 Workshop Agenda.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:04 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Matt Watkins, Mayor Daniela Erickson, City Clerk
PASSED and APPROVED this 6th day of November, 2017
Page 2 of 2 Page 10 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council November 2, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Director
Finance
SUBJECT: Bills and Communications
I. REFERENCE(S):
Accounts Payable 11.06.17
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
To approve claims in the total amount of $4,462,502.61 ($2,145,926.43 in Check Nos.
218718-219041; $918,329.59 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 817996-818134, 818141-
818193, 818195-818429, 818493-818495; $72,406.68 in Check Nos. 51155-51234;
$1,325,839.91 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30112907-30113908).
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
V. DISCUSSION:
Page 11 of 125
November 6, 2017
Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'l Bank Electronic Bank Combined
Check Numbers 218718-219041 51155-51234
Total Check Amount $2,145,926.43 $72,406.68 Total Checks 2,218,333.11$
Electronic Transfer Numbers 817996-818134 30112907-30113908
818141-818193
818195-818429
818493-818495
Total EFT Amount $918,329.59 $1,325,839.91 $0.00 Total EFTs 2,244,169.50$
Grand Total 4,462,502.61$
Councilmember
657,440.72
52,284.91
0.00
0.00
6,816.12
10,000.00
0.00
3,255.18
28,349.88
5,320.58
1,335.51
58,094.41
2,388.30
2,862.07
0.00
1,326.43
30,970.73
0.00
9,094.13
0.00
0.00
70,276.36
10,634.36
0.00
382,507.96
954,320.86
37,630.79
8,394.00
0.00
0.00
234,682.66
0.00
9,935.47
1,884,581.18
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS:4,462,502.61$
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT BUSINESS
MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE
OLD FIRE OPEB
FLEX
PAYROLL CLEARING
STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER
LID
GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION
UTILITY, WATER/SEWER
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LODGING
LITTER ABATEMENT
REVOLVING ABATEMENT
TRAC DEVELOPMENT & OPERATING
PARKS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS
GOLF COURSE
SENIOR CENTER OPERATING
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY
SCHOOL IMPACT FEES
RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN
C.D. BLOCK GRANT
HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT
NSP GRANT
MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER
AMBULANCE SERVICE
CEMETERY
Councilmember
SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND
STREET
ARTERIAL STREET
STREET OVERLAY
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as
described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim.
Dave Zabell, City Manager Richa Sigdel, Finance Director
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this
6th day of November, 2017 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment:
C I T Y O F P A S C O
Council Meeting of:
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
Page 12 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council November 1, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: DAHP Grant for Survey of African American Properties in Pasco (MF# HIST
2017-002)
I. REFERENCE(S):
August 27, 2017 Memo from Tanya Bowers, Planning Commissioner
Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP)
Grant Contract
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to authorize the City Manager to execute the Washington State
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Grant Contract.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Under $2,000 in direct costs for City staff support.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Around the beginning of August 2017, Ms. Tanya Bowers contacted the City of Pasco,
Community & Economic Development Department, with a proposal to apply for, and
if successful, manage a $10,000 Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation
(DAHP) grant financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service,
Department of the Interior. The focus of the application would be documenting
properties associated with African-American heritage in east Pasco.
With great assistance from Ms. Bowers, the City applied for the grant which was
subsequently approved by DAHP. The grant will be administered through the City.
Staff will be required to put the grant out to bid as per DAHP and National Park
Service guidelines. Ms. Bowers and Dr. Robert Bauman, both of whom have strong
Page 13 of 125
historic preservation credentials will be competing for the research contract.
This item was discussed by City Council at the October 23, 2017 workshop meeting.
V. DISCUSSION:
Underrepresented Community Grant projects include surveys and inventories of
historic properties associated with communities underrepresented in the National
Register of Historic Places, as well as the development of nominations to the National
Register for specific sites. Grants are awarded through a competitive process and do
not require a non-Federal match. The grants are administered by the National Park
Service.
The survey objective is to document properties in East Pasco historically associated
with African Americans.
The African Americans for Community, Cultural, and Education Success (AACCES)
have already identified 7 public and private sites (a school, a park, a bridge, a
commercial building, 3 churches) of significance.
Page 14 of 125
1
Jeff Adams
From:Tanya Bowers <tanyabowers@att.net>
Sent:Tuesday, August 29, 2017 3:16 PM
To:Rick White; Jeff Adams
Cc:Robert Bauman
Subject:WA DAHP Grant for Survey of African American Properties in Pasco
Attachments:Pasco FY18 Schedule Budget-v3.doc; FY18 Pasco Scope of Work and Map.docx
Gentleman,
Kim Gant has informed me that the City of Pasco will be receiving $10K to survey African-American properties in
Pasco. You will soon be receiving official notification of this in the form of a contract, but Kim wanted me to show this to
you 1) to make sure it sounds kosher and 2) as you will want to assemble a list of bidders together to notify about the
RFP. You will see in the attached budget, timeline that this will all be happening quickly.
The scope of work is somewhat complicated, but there are three major things that need to take place:
1. Requirement that at least one publicized public meeting is held to try to gather more information about the African
American residents of Pasco, including any more places of significance.
2. Hire a consultant to survey the resources in East Pasco that retain integrity from the period (mostly the houses that
Tanya showed Kim saw that still look like they did in the 1940s – 1960s). This is where you will need the consultant – to
determine which properties have enough integrity. You will need the City to provide a list of addresses in East Pasco that
have a build-date before 1965. That list would then be used in the field to determine if the building has integrity. Those
with integrity will be the ones that get recorded in Wisaard and put on the list for potential intensive-level research.
3. Choose a just few to get intensive level research because that type of research is expensive. After we determine
which ones should get intensive level research, either use the consultant again or have Dr. Baumann put the students on
it.
Just a few things to note:
--A couple of the buildings we already identified (Lewis Street Underpass, the Beasley residence behind the bus depot)
fall outside the boundaries of the map. That's o.k., but the map helped to demarcate where the majority of the sites lie.
--We may want to update the Historic Preservation Commission. I think the next meeting is September 12th. If that's the
case I'm going to be out of town. Perhaps Bob can cover?
--Rick mentioned that we'd want to notify the City Council. We had first told them about the federal application to the
National Parks Service which we didn't receive the first time around, but we have yet to hear about our FY 18
application. If you still feel it's necessary, I'm happy to apprise them. This will probably be more relevant once the city
receives the contract though.
Let me know your thoughts about any of the above.
Best,
Tanya
Tanya Bowers, M.A. tanyabowers@att.net 509.430.8772.
Page 15 of 125
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation
1110 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 • PO Box 48343 • Olympia, Washington 98504-8343
(360) 586-3065 • Fax Number (360) 586-3067 • www.dahp.wa.gov
Grant No.: FYIS-61018-007
Contact Person:
Federal Grant No .:
CFDANo.:
Grant Title:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date:
DAHP Contract #FY18-61018-007
Grant Agreement
Between
Washington State
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation
And
City of Pasco
Loren Doolittle (360) 586-3072
NIA
15-904
City of Pasco
October 1, 2017
August 31, 2018
Survey and Public Outreach
This agreement is made between The Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT, and City of Pasco, hereinafter
referred to as the GRANTEE.
Section 1. Responsibilities of the Grantee
A. The GRANTEE will perform or cause others to perform the work described in the
"Scope of Work" (Attachment 2). Additional special conditions or specifics about
the work required by this agreement, if any, are in attachments as enumerated and
described in Section 3. The GRANTEE agrees to perform the work in accordance
with any such special conditions or specifics.
B. The GRANTEE understands that the work called for under this agreement must
conform to federal administrative requirements as they relate to the
DEPARTMENT, and the GRANTEE agrees to comply with all such
Page 16 of 125
DAHP Contract #FY18-61018-007
requirements. The following documents summarize some of these requirements
and are incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though set forth in full:
(1) The requirements of OMB Circular A-133 for States, Local Governments,
and Non-profit organizations.
(2) The "Secretary of Interior Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and
Historic Preservation." All products under this contract must be in
compliance with the relevant Secretary's Standards and Guidelines e.g.
Preservation Planning, Identification, Evaluation, Registration, Historic
Research and Documentation, Architectural and Engineering
Documentation, Archeological Investigation, Historic Preservation
Projects, and Preservation Terminology.
(3) The "Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual." -Latest Revision,
September 2005.
(4) "Grants in Aid Manual." Department of Community Trade and Economic
Development, Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation.
(5) "Fiscal Year 2013 Historic Preservation Fund Annual Grant Application
and Budget Changes I Special Conditions."
(6) "43 CFR 17 Civil Rights, Subpart A, Implementing Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964; and Subpart B, Implementing Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973; and Subpart C, Implementing the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975; and subpart E, Enforcement of
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities
Conducted by the Department of the Interior."
(7) "Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990," 42 U.S.C. 1201 et seg. (ADA)
provides comprehensive civil rights to individuals with disabilities in the
areas of employment, public accommodations, state and local government
services, and telecommunications.
c. The GRANTEE agrees to comply with the restrictions of 18 U.S.C. 1913
concerning lobbying with appropriated funds: "No part of the money appropriated
by any enactment of Congress shall, in the absence of express authorization by
Congress, be used directly or indirectly to pay for any personal service,
advertisement, telegram, telephone, letter, printed or written matter, or other
device, intended or designed to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, to
favor or oppose, by vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by
Congress, whether before or after the introduction of any bill or resolution
Page 17 of 125
DAHP Contract #FY18-61018-007
proposing such legislation or appropriation; but this shall not prevent officers or
employees of the United States or its departments or agencies from
communicating to Members of Congress at the request of any Member, or to
Congress through the proper official channels, requests for legislation or
appropriations which they deem necessary for the efficient conduct of the public
business."
D. The GRANTEE agrees to maintain records in a manner which will provide an
audit trail to all expenditures reported to the DEPARTMENT. The GRANTEE
agrees to keep these records for at least four years following the ending date of the
grant. In the event that an audit of the GRANTEE or of the DEPARTMENT
should take exception to any expenditures by the GRANTEE, the GRANTEE
agrees to refund to the DEPARTMENT on demand the amount determined by the
audit as due. In the event that the DEPARTMENT is required to institute legal
proceedings to enforce this repayment provision, the DEPARTMENT shall be
entitled to its costs thereof, including reasonable attorney's fees. When arranging
for an audit, the DEPARTMENT should contact:
Jeff Adams 509-843-1601
525 N. third Ave Second Floor
Pasco, WA 99301 adamsj@pasco-wa.gov
E. The GRANTEE agrees to pay all the costs involved in carrying out the terms of
this agreement prior to seeking reimbursement as provided for in Section 2. a.
When seeking reimbursement, the GRANTEE will submit a completed
reimbursement form in writing to the DEPARTMENT and provide such
documents as an affidavit of publication for newspaper advertising soliciting bids,
contracts, photocopies of canceled checks and invoices, and other documents as
may be requested by the DEPARTMENT. The DEPARTMENT will provide the
GRANTEE with the reimbursement form and guidelines for financial reporting
procedures. The GRANTEE agrees to submit its request for reimbursement within
thirty (30) days following completion of the work.
F . The GRANTEE agrees to provide the DEPARTMENT with a completion report
following a form provided by the DEPARTMENT. The GRANTEE will submit
this report on or before the end date. The GRANTEE agrees that the
DEPARTMENT shall have the right to withhold all or part of the payment
required in Section 2.a. pending receipt of this completion report.
G. The GRANTEE agrees that the "Budget" (Attachment 1) shall be a financial guide
for the work called for by this agreement. The GRANTEE may exceed the
budgeted amounts, but this shall in no way obligate the DEPARTMENT for a
Page 18 of 125
DAHP Contract #FY18-61018-007
greater amount than that stipulated as DEPARTMENT share. In the event that the
GRANTEE should spend less than the budgeted amount on an object or element in
the budget, the DEPARTMENT may either reduce its obligation proportionately or
it may terminate this agreement. The GRANTEE agrees to maintain records which
will render an accurate accounting by the elements or objects in the budget. The
actual expenditures for the amounts reflected in the budget may vary by 15 percent
without requiring an amendment to this grant agreement.
H. The GRANTEE agrees that the DEPARTMENT shall have the right to terminate
this agreement if the GRANTEE shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner
its obligations under this agreement or if the GRANTEE shall violate any of the
covenants, conditions, or stipulations of the agreement. In case of such
termination by the DEPARTMENT, the GRANTEE agrees to return to the
DEPARTMENT within thirty (30) days of the effective date of termination, any
payments made by the DEPARTMENT to the GRANTEE under the terms of this
agreement or any portion of such payments as may be directed by the
DEPARTMENT.
The GRANTEE agrees to submit the products identified in the Scope of Work on
or before the grant end date. GRANTEE acknowledges and understands that final
products which do not conform to the terms and conditions of this agreement or
which do not meet the applicable Secretary of the Interior's Standards will not be
reimbursed.
I. The GRANTEE agrees to submit a "Schedule for Project Completion"
(Attachment 6) before beginning work under this agreement. Said schedule form
shall list each element described in the "Scope of Work" and shall indicate the
approximate date when completion of each can be expected.
J. The GRANTEE will maintain regular contact with the DEPARTMENT regarding
the progress of the grant project. The GRANTEE agrees that the DEPARTMENT
shall have the right to monitor the work called for by this agreement.
K. The GRANTEE agrees to use competitive negotiation procedures (or small
purchase procedures for under $25,000) for procurement of professional services
and subcontracts. GRANTEE agrees to maintain records sufficient to detail the
significant history of a procurement and to forward evidence of competitive
procurement to the D EP AR TMENT prior to reimbursement of funds under this
agreement. (See Section 3, Attachment 7.)
L. The GRANTEE agrees that it, its agents and employees, and any other person or
entity performing any work under this agreement, are independent contractors and
not employees of the State of Washington.
Page 19 of 125
DAHP Contract #FY18-61018-007
M. Federal funds are the basis for this contract. The GRANTEE certifies that neither
it nor its principals are presently debarred, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in transactions by any federal department or agency.
Should for any reason the Federal funds which are the basis for this agreement
become withdrawn, the agreement may be terminated without penalty to the
DEPARTMENT.
N. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend and
hold harmless State, agencies of State and all officials, agents and employees of
State, from and against" all claims for injuries or death arising out of or resulting
from the performance of the Contract. Contractor's obligation to indemnify,
defend, and hold harmless includes any claim by Contractors' agents, employees,
representatives, or any subcontractor or its employees.
Contractor expressly agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the State for
any claim arising out of or incident to Contractor's or any subcontractor's
performance or failure to perform the Contract. Contractor's obligation to
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the State shall not be eliminated or reduced
by any actual or alleged concurrent negligence of State or its agents, agencies,
employees and officials.
Consistent with RCW 43.17.320.340, the parties shall make every effort to
resolve disputes arising out of, or relating to, this contract through discussion and
negotiation.
Should discussion and negotiation fail to resolve a dispute arising under this
contract, the parties shall select a dispute resolution team to resolve the dispute.
The team shall consist of a representative appointed by the director of each party
and a third party mutually agreed upon by the director of each party. The team
shall attempt, by majority vote, to resolve the dispute. If the dispute cannot be
resolved in this fashion, either party may request assistance from the Governor
pursuant to RCW 43.17.330.
o. The GRANTEE agrees to provide or purchase industrial insurance coverage, as
applicable, prior to performing work under this agreement. The DEPARTMENT
will not be responsible for payment of industrial insurance premiums or for any
other claim or benefit for this GRANTEE, or any sub-grantee or employee of the
GRANTEE, which might arise under the industrial insurance laws during
performance of duties and services under this agreement. If the Department of
Labor and Industries, upon audit, determines that industrial insurance payments
are due and owing as a result to work performed under this agreement, those
payments shall be made by the GRANTEE; the GRANTEE shall indemnify the
DEPARTMENT and guarantee payment of such amounts.
Page 20 of 125
DAHP Contract #FY18-61018-007
P. The GRANTEE agrees to include written acknowledgment of National Park
Service, Department of Community Trade and Economic Development, and
Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation support for all grant-related
publications and public information materials including audio-visual and
workshop materials. The GRANTEE further agrees that the written
acknowledgment shall comply with the form and content stipulated in the
"Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual -Latest Revision September 2005."
Q. The GRANTEE agrees to any additional conditions identified in section 3 and
attached to this agreement.
R. There shall be no discrimination against any person employed by the GRANTEE
in connection with work covered by or related to this agreement, or against any
applicant for such employment, because of race, creed, color, sex, age, martial
status, national origin, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical
handicap in accordance with Chapter 49.60RCW. This provision shall include, but
not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer;
recruitment or advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of
compensation and selection for training. The GRANTEE shall insert a similar
provision in all subcontracts for services covered by this agreement.
During the performance of this Contract, the Contractor shall comply with all
federal and state nondiscrimination laws, regulations and policies.
s. In accordance with legislative findings and policies set forth in Chapter 39.19
RCW the GRANTEE is encouraged in the participation and use of Minority and
Women's Business Enterprise firms certified by OMWB.
T. The GRANTEE agrees to a 60 I 40 match of funds. One hundred percent (100%)
being the full amount of the grant. The GRANTEE agrees that any match
specifically identified to this grant agreement by the GRANTEE, the GRANTEE
will not claim such match for any other grant, agreement or contract. The
DEPARTMENT has first and exclusive claim to match provided by the
GRANTEE to this agreement as indirect eligible match to the National Park
Service, Historic Preservation Fund Grant awarded to the DEPARTMENT.
DEPARTMENT: Grant Amount: $10,000.00. GRANTEE: Minimum Grant Match
Amount: $6,048.08
Page 21 of 125
DAHP Contract# FY18-61018-007
Section 2. Responsibilities of the DEPARTMENT
A. The DEPARTMENT agrees to reimburse the GRANTEE one hundred (100)
percent of its actual authorized expenditures for the purpose of this agreement,
provided:
(1) The total paid by the DEPARTMENT shall not exceed the amount
stipulated in the "Budget" (Attachment 1) as DEPARTMENT share .
(2) All expenditures were incurred between the beginning and ending dates of
the grant.
(3) No expenditures have been previously claimed in any other grant from any
agency of the state or federal government.
(4) The DEPARTMENT has authority to expend the funds required to meet
the obligations contained herein.
(5) The GRANTEE has met all requirements contained in this agreement.
B. The DEPARTMENT agrees to consider requests from the GRANTEE for
progress payments if, in the DEPARTMENT'S judgment, the public interest will
be served by doing so and if such payments are administratively practical.
c. The DEPARTMENT may unilaterally terminate all or part of this contract, or may
reduce its scope of work and budget, if there is a reduction in funds by the source
of those funds, and if such funds are the basis for this contract.
Section 3. Attachments
The following attachments are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this agreement.
Attachment # 1.
Attachment #2
Attachment #3A.
Attachment #3B,
Attachment #3C.
Attachment #4.
Attachment #5
Attachment #6
"Budget," consisting of one page.
"Scope of Work consisting of five pages.
"Civil Rights Assurance'', consisting of one page.
"Understanding Grant Requirements'', consisting of one page.
"Certification Regarding Debarment," consisting of one page.
"State Form A 19-1 Invoice Voucher" to be used as basis for
billing, consisting of one page.
"Report of Services/ Labor Value Appraisal" form to be used by
GRANTEE to document labor costs, consisting of one page.
"Schedule for Project Completion" form, consisting of one page
Page 22 of 125
DAHP Contract# FY18-61018-007
Attachment #?"Competitive Negotiation and Small Purchases Contracting
Documentation," consisting of one page, for a total of thirteen (13) pages.
Section 4. Amendments
This grant agreement may only be amended if such amendment is in writing (with the
exception of the 15% variance for actual expenditures identified in Section 1.g), agreed to
and signed by all the parties, and attached hereto.
DEPARTMENT: GRANTEE:
Allyson Brooks, Director City of Pasco
Date Date
Fed ID No.
Page 23 of 125
~DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & HISTORIC PRESERVATION -1 Protect the Past. Shope lhe Fvtvre
Page 24 of 125
VI. PROJECT BUDGET
ELEMENT /OBJECT
Salaries
(include each position-volunteer or staff -and
attach hourly wage justification if needed)
Community Econ Dev Staff (RFP, list of
relevant properties, community
meetings reviewing, meetinasl
Prof. Bob Bauman (teaching class
assignments, supervising interns)
Historic Preservation Commission
Cmeetinas. reviewinal
WSU TC students (researching 10 sites
over 15 week semester as internship/
independent study)
Indirect O/o
*Include ·ustification for indirect %
Total Element/Object:
GOODS & SERVICES
Contract Services
Cultural Resource Consultant
Materials/Supplies/Equipment
Public Meeting (Advertising, poster
printing, refreshments, room rental)
Report printing
I Travel
I Other
Total Goods & Services:
Total Funding Request
Federal Dollars
(CLG grant
requested)
Federal Dollars
$10,000.00
Federal Dollars
$10,000.00
Hard Match* Soft Match* Total
(Local government (Donated goods
cash match = Staff and services =
Hours) volunteer hours)
43 hrs/$40/hr $1,720
46 hrs/ $1,840
$40/hr
12 hrs/ $289.68
$24.14/hr
4 $1,448.40
students/15
hrs @24.14
hr
$1,720.00 $3,578.08 $5,298.08
Hard Match Soft Match Total
$10,000.00
$750.00
Hard Match Soft Match Total Project Cost
$1,720.00 $4,328.40 $16,048.08
Page 25 of 125
Contract# FY18-61018-007
ATTACHMENT 2
Scope of Work
I.WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED: The GRANTEE shall conduct the following
activities:
A.CITY OF PASCO: The GRANTEE shall conduct a SURVEY and PUBLIC
OUTREACH PROJECT as follows:
1.SURVEY AREA AND CRITERIA: The GRANTEE shall complete a
survey of:
a)AREA: Select resources in East Pasco (see map page 5). The map
represents the approximate area. There are known resources that are
not within the boundary and they shall be included in the survey.
Resources discovered during the public outreach process may also be
included (as long as they are in Pasco) if the project team deems then
significant to African American history in Pasco.
a) CRITERIA: Survey will include structures and/or sites built before
1970 that retain a moderate to high degree of physical integrity from
their period of construction, within the boundary of the attached map
of East Pasco. Reconnaissance level survey shall be completed first
and a selection of those properties will be chosen for intensive level
research.
i.See Washington State Standards for Cultural Resource
Reporting for more specific information regarding survey
levels.
http://www.dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/CR%20Update%20
2015%282%29.pdf.
11.A detailed statement of significance shall be written for
approximately ten (10) properties based on research, which
may include oral histories, deed searches, city directory
searches etc ...
2.SURVEY PROJECT MANAGER: The GRANTEE shall ensure that the
personnel directing the survey activities meet the professional
qualifications in 36 CFR 61, Appendix A. The personnel must be procured
using a competitive process as outlined in the Historic Preservation Fund
Grants Manual, October 1997, see Attachment #7. Before final selection,
the GRANTEE shall afford the DEPARTMENT an opportunity to review
Page 1
Page 26 of 125
Contract# FY18-61018-007
and approve candidates for the historic preservation consultant conducting
the survey project.
3. SURVEY STANDARDS: The GRANTEE shall conduct the survey
activity and produce complete inventory forms consistent with the
guidelines in the Washington State Standards for Cultural Resource
Reporting:
http ://www.dahp.wa.gov/sitesl defaultlfiles/CR%20Update%202015%282
%29.pdf
4.
a) COMPLETED SURVEY:
(1) A COMPLETED SURVEY is understood to mean that the
GRANTEE has used the WISAARD ONLINE SYSTEM to
document all required survey materials of the defined
survey area and has submitted the survey to the
DEPARTMENT. The inventory records must be
determined acceptable by the DEPARTMENT.
(2) The REQUIRED SURVEY MATERIALS are understood
to include a MAP of the ENTIRE SURVEY AREA with all
sites marked and numbered.
(3) A SURVEY REPORT is required. A SURVEY REPORT
is understood to mean a report which folluws the guidelines
for survey project reports provided by tht DEPARTMENT
within the Washington State Standardufor Cultural
Resource Reporting which includes the introduction,
survey methodology, analysis, recommendations, a map of
the entire survey area with all sites marked and numbered,
and a table of the properties with local and National
Register eligibility recommendations.
b) A COMPLETED INVENTORY FORM is understood to mean a
completed record on the WISAARD ONLINE SYSTEM, with
each field completed and at least three digital images of each
property.
c) The DEPARTMENT will be able to view draft copies of Historic
Property Inventory Forms via WISAARD. The DEPARTMENT
shall respond to the GRANTEE within 14 days of each draft
submittal with comments. If the DEPARTMENT has not
responded within 14 days, the GRANTEE shall assume that the
DEPARTMENT has no comment on the draft submittals.
5. INCOMPLETE OR INACCEPTABLE MATERIALS: Any required
survey materials submitted which are not considered acceptable or
complete-which do not meet the DEPARTMENT's cultural resource
Page2
Page 27 of 125
Contract# FY18-61018-007
survey editorial standards and/or do not contain the required level of
documentation-will be returned to the GRANTEE for completion within
the grant period.
6. REIMBURSEMENT: The GRANTEE will only be reimbursed for
preparing acceptable and complete required survey submitted during the
grant period.
7. DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES: The DEPARTMENT shall
provide the GRANTEE with the information to gain access to the
WISAARD ONLINE SYSTEM.
8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The SURVEY REPORT shall include in its
entirety the following acknowledgement, disclaimer, and non-
discrimination statements:
This survey has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service,
Department of the Interior administered by the Department of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation (DAHP) and the City of Pasco. However, the contents and opinions do not
necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, DAHP, nor
does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation by the Department of the Interior or DAHP.
This program received Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the
U.S. Department of Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental
Federally Assisted Programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap.
Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program,
activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director,
Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849
C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240.
9. PROJECT MANAGER: The GRANTEE shall ensur~ that the personnel
preparing the survey documentation meet the professional qualifications in
36 CFR 61, Appendix A. The personnel must be procured using a
competitive process as outlined in the Historic Preservation Fund Grants
Manual, October 1997, see Attachment #7. Before final selection, the
GRANTEE shall afford the DEPARTMENT an opportunity to review
and approve candidates for the historic preservation consultant
conducting the survey project.
10. INCOMPLETE OR INACCEPTABLE MATERIALS: Any required
materials submitted which are not considered acceptable or complete will
be returned to the GRANTEE for completion within the grant period.
11. REIMBURSEMENT: The GRANTEE will only be reimbursed for
preparing an acceptable and complete Survey Product during the grant
period.
Page 3
Page 28 of 125
Contract# FY18-61018-007
B. PUBLIC EDUCATION ACTIVITIES
1. The GRANTEE shall conduct at least two public presentations/meetings
during the grant period subject to the following conditions:
a) The purpose of the first presentation(s) shall be to determine if
there are historic properties associated with the African American
experience in Pasco. The purpose of the second meeting shall be to
present the findings of the survey.
b) Following each public meeting, provide the DEPARTMENT with
a summary of the number of participants, comments, and notable
conclusions arising from the presentation. This may be in email
format.
D. REPORTING ACTIVITIES
1. GRANT ADMINISTRATION: The GRANTEE shall establish and
maintain contact with the DEPARTMENT throughout the grant period as
to the status of all grant activities by preparing and submitting the
requested documents to the DEPARTMENT at the times indicated in the
SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION
II. PRODUCTS: The GRANTEE shall at a minimum submit the following products to the
DEPARTMENT:
A. SURVEY FORMS and SURVEY REPORT: Historic Property Inventory form for
each property surveyed. The SURVEY REPORT and map may be provided as a
pdf and shall include a report cover sheet per DAHP standards.
B. PUBLIC EDUCATION: One email memo per public meeting summarizing
attendance and any notable conclusions from the meeting.
Page4
Page 29 of 125
.·
..
q I •I
·.
·~ ..
PilSCO ·~
, ..
·' .,,
.. •• ' .. .
~ ...
f " '· "' ~ .. .. ·'' ,.,.,., . _, • ~ '11,, .. t ...
., .
7
,,
..
Al I
ti.1o1n1t H
I .\"
l. ...
-:
~ •
;:
\I
Contract# FY18-61018-007
.
111 111 ·0 -
I•"·"' J
i
" ' _,
, .. I I
Page 5
Page 30 of 125
ATTACHMENT 3A
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
CIVIL RIGHTS ASSURANCE
As the authorized representative of the applicant, I certify that the applicant agrees that, as a
condition to receiving any Federal financial assistance from the Department of the Interior, it will
comply with all Federal laws relating to nondiscrimination. These laws include, but are not limited
to: (a) Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1), which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of race, color, or national origin; (b) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
(29 U.S.C. 794 ), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap; (c) the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101 et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
age; and applicable regulatory requirements to the end that no person in the United States shall, on
the grounds of race, color, national origin, handicap or age, be excluded from participation in, be
denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity
conducted by the applicant. THE APPLICANT HEREBY GIVES ASSURANCE THAT it will immediately
take any measures necessary to effectuate this agreement.
THIS ASSURANCE shall apply to all aspects of the applicant's operations including those parts that
have not received or benefited from Federal financial assistance.
If any real property or structure thereon is provided or improved with the aid of Federal financial
assistance extended to the Applicant by the Department, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant,
or in the case of any transfer of such property, any transferee, for the period during which the real
property or structure is sued for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or
for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property
is so provided, this assurance shall obligate the Applicant for the period during which it retains
ownership or possession of the property. In all other cases, this assurance shall obligate the
Applicant for the period during which the Federal financial assistance is extended to it by the
Department.
THIS ASSURANCE is given in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining any and all Federal
grants, loans, contracts, property, discounts or other Federal financial assistance extended after the
date hereof to the Applicant by the Department, including installment payments after such date on
account of applicants for Federal financial assistance which were approved before such date.
The Applicant recognizes and agrees that such Federal financial assistance will be extended in
reliance on the representations and agreements made in this assurance 1 and that the United States
shall have the right to seek judicial enforcement of the assurance. This assurance is binding on the
Applicant, its successors, transferees, assignees, and subrecipients and the person whose signature
appears below who is authorized to sign this assurance on behalf of the Applicant.
CiTY OF PASCO
APPUCANT/ORGANlZATION MAILING ADDRF.SS
5 /5 N. 3'0 AVCNLJE
Prisco. WA 99301
Previous Edition Usable
Till.[
DAl E SUBM!HED
APRIL 28, 2017
BUHI:.£\U OR OFFICE EXTENDING ASSISTANCE
Authorized for Local Reproduction
DI-1350
(REV 6/91)
Standard Form 4240 (Rev.7-97)
Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
Page 31 of 125
ATTACHMENT 38
STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING FOR GRANT MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
• CLGs receiving HPF grant assistance must fulfill the terms of their grant agreement
with the state and adhere to all requirements of the National Register Programs
Manual. This requirement includes compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, 78 Stat. 241, as amended, which provides that no person on the grounds of
age, race, color, or national origin shall be excluded from participation in, be denied
the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any activity receiving Federal
financial assistance.
• Local financial management systems shall be in accordance with the standards
specified in OMB Circular A-128, "Standards for Grantee Financial Management
Systems."
• Indirect costs may be charged as part of the CLG grant only if the CLG subgrantee
meets the requirements of the manual. Unless the CLG has a current indirect cost
rate approved by the cognizant federal agency, only direct costs may be charged .
• Grant recipients must maintain auditable financial records in accordance with the
General Accounting Office's Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations,
Programs, Activities, and Functions.
• The CLG subgrantee will provide, with request for reimbursement, documentation to
support billings (time sheets, front and back canceled checks, etc .) for federal and
non-federal share claimed.
• Repayment w i ll be made to the SHPO organization if terms and conditions of the
subgrant agreement are not followed or costs claimed are disallowed following audi t.
City of Pasco
City Manager
~?t.d-Ot]
DATE
A -1
Page 32 of 125
ATTACHMENT 3C
U.S. Department of the Interior
Certification Regarding
Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and
Voluntary Exclusion
Lower Tier Covered Transactions
This certification is required by the regulations implementing Executive Order
12549, Debarment and Suspension, 43 CFR Part 12, Section 12.510,
Participants' responsibilities. The regulations were published as Part VII of the
May 26, 1988 Federal Reg ister (pages 19160-19211). Copies of the
regulations are included in the proposal package. For further assistance in
obtaining a copy of the regulations, contact the U.S. Department of the
Interior, Acquisition and Assistance Division, Office of Acquisition and Property
Management, 18th and C Streets, N. W., Washington, D.C. 20240.
(BEFORE COMPLETING CERTIFICATION, READ INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE)
(1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this
proposal that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred,
suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department
or agency.
(2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of
the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall
attach an explanation to this proposal.
Signature
Page 33 of 125
FORM
A19-1A
STATE OF WASHINGTON
INVOICE VOUCHER
AGENCY NAME
Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation
PO Box48343
1063 South Capital Way Suite
Olympia, Wa 98504-8343
ATTN:
VENDOR OR CLAIMANT (warrant is to be payable to)
City of Pasco
525 N. third Ave Second Floor
Pasco, WA 99301
Attachment Four
FEDERAL 1.D. NO OR SOCIAL SECURITY NO
DATE DESCRIPTION
PREPARED BY (Fiscal) DATE
DOC DATE CURRENT DOC NO REF DOC NO
M SUB
TRANS 0 APPN PROGRAM SUB SUB
RECEIVED BY
AGENCY USE ONLY
AGENCY NO. I CONTRACT NO. OR GA AUTH. NO .
103 I FY16-61016-007
INSTRUCTIONS TO VENDOR OR CLAIMANT:
In the absence of a detailed invoice, submit this form to claim payment for
materials, merchandise or services . Show complete detail for each item .
Vendor's Certificate:
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the items and totals listed herein
are proper charges for materials, merchandise or services furnished to the
State of Washington, and that all goods furnished and/or services rendered have
been provided without discrimination because of age, sex, marital status, race,
creed, color, national origin, handicap, religion, or Vietnam era or disabled
veteran status.
By:
(Sign in ink)
(Title) (Date)
DA TE RECEIVED
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
DIVISION APPROVAL DATE
VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR MESSAGE
INVOICE GENERAL
SUF CODE D FUND INDEX INDEX OBJ OBJ CNTY CITY PROJECT AMOUNT NUMBER LEDGER
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT BY FISCAL DATE WARRANT TOTAL
Approved CTED Form A19-1A (10/15/95) Page 34 of 125
V. SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION
List each proposed grant activity separately estimating the start and completion
dates. This should be a complete listing of all potential activities associated with the
grant including the two draft submittal dates of May 3, 2018 for the first draft and
July 19, 2018 for the second draft. Final projects must be turned in by August 31,
2018. A start date and completion date are not sufficient for the Schedule of Project
Completion.
Estimated Estimated
WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED Starting Date Completion Date
City staff prepares scope of work and Oct 1, 2017 Dec 31, 2017
publishes an RFP to solicit proposals from
Cultural Resources Consultants.
City staff works with Consultant to identify Jan 1, 2018 Jan 31, 2018
sources of existing information and all
potential cultural heritage partners.
First public meeting to introduce the Feb 1, 2018 Feb 28, 2018
project and help Consultant identify
additional sites and resources.
First Draft of Survey presented to project April 1, 2018 May 2, 2018
staff and partners for review.
Second Draft of Survey presented to July 1, 2018 July 15, 2018
project staff and partners for review.
Second public meeting to present results. Aug 1, 2018 Aug 15, 2018
Final report to be posted on the City's and Aug 15, 2018 Aug 31, 2018
respective partners' websites, as
appropriate. All products sent to DAHP.
Enter information on sites into WISSARD. Aug 15, 2018 Aug 31, 2018
Reimbursement requests submitted to Sep 1, 2018 Sep 30, 2018
DAHP.
Page 35 of 125
ATTACHEMENT 6
V. SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION
List each proposed grant activity separately estimating the start and
completion dates.
Estimated Estimated
WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED Starting Date Completion Date
Page 36 of 125
ATTACHMENT 7
COMPETITIVE NEGOTIATION AND SMALL
PURCHASES CONTRACTING DOCUMENTATION
THIS FORMAT SHOULD BE USED FOR CONTRACTS FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AND OTHER PROCUREMENT TO DOCUMENT COMPLIANCE
WITH FEDERAL PROCUREMENT STANDARDS.
1. Grant Number:
2. Type of Contract: Professional Services -----
Printing
Equipment/Supplies ____ _
Other
3. Addresses of Contractors Contacted:
Name of Person/Business:
Street or PO Box:
City/State/Zip Code:
Work Telephone Number:
Quote/Bid given:
Name of Person/Business:
Street or PO Box:
City/State/Zip Code:
Work Telephone Number:
Quote/Bid given:
Name of Person/Business:
Street or PO Box:
City/State/Zip Code:
Work Telephone Number:
Quote/Bid given:
Contractor Selected:
Basis for Selection: Lowest Price Other ----------
If the basis for selection was not the lowest price, explain the basis used:
Signature of Grantee Official Date
Page 37 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 24, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
Executive
SUBJECT: Tourism Promotion Area
I. REFERENCE(S):
2018 Budget Summary
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve the 2018 Marketing Plan and Operating Budget for the
Tourism Promotion Area in the total amount of $1,421,663.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) was formed in late 2004 to generate and
administer the proceeds of a "per room night assessment" on hotels/motels in the Tri-
Cities, imposed by the hotels themselves.
The interlocal agreement (between Pasco, Kennewick and Richland) that creat ed the
TPA requires the annual budget and expenditure from the reserve account for the TPA
to be approved by the City Council. The Budget Summary for 2018 is attached.
V. DISCUSSION:
The TPA "assessment" is remitted by the hotels to the state which, in turn, distributes it
to the city in which it was collected. The City is obligated to pass the funds to the
TPA, for use in accordance with the approved budget.
This item was discussed at the October 23 Council meeting. Staff recommends
Council approval.
Page 38 of 125
Page 39 of 125
Budget Summary
Revenues
2017
Budget
Proposed 2018
Budget
Kennewick $594,000 44% $625,531 44%
Pasco $310,500 23% $326,983 23%
Richland $445,500 33% $469,149 33%
Total: $1,350,000 100% $1,421,663 100%
Expenditures
Group Markets $614,383 44.5% $649,200 45.7%
City Wide Conventions
Associations
Corporate & Government
SMERF (social, military,
education, religious, fraternal)
Sports
Housing & Group Services $65,476 4.9% $68,652 4.8%
Tourism Development $358,926 26.6% $389,278 27.4%
Administration $194,895 14.4% $201,247 14.2%
(administrative staff, office
supplies, rent, telephone
postage, equipment
maintenance, etc.)
Opportunity Fund $90,000 6.7% $86,500 6%
Accounting/Professional $23,320 1.7% $23,786 1.7%
Capital Expenditures $3,000 .2% $3,000 .2%
Total: $1,350,000 100% $1,421,663 100%
Page 40 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council November 1, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Darcy Bourcier, Planner I
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Dedication Deed: Right-of-Way for a Portion of Burns Rd (MF# DEED 2017-
009)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Overview Map
Vicinity Map
Dedication Deed
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to accept the deed from Leticia Rebolledo and Oscar Avalos for a
portion of the Burns Road right-of-way.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
From approximately the 7700 block to the 8700 block of Burns Road (formerly
Powerline Road), a 25-foot wide PUD easement runs across the northernmost 13 to 14
feet of the properties that abut the street to the south. The applicants are in the process
of obtaining a permit for a patio cover and as a condition of permit approval they are
required to dedicate (per Resolution 1372) the necessary right-of-way for Burns Road
abutting their lot (approximately 90' in width).
V. DISCUSSION:
A 25-foot wide PUD easement runs across the northernmost 13 to 14 feet of the
applicants' property on the outside of the back fence along Burns Road. Within this
easement, the City proposes to install (at future City expense) sidewalk, irrigation, and
Page 41 of 125
landscaping in the area as part of future Burns Road improvements; the goal is to
develop a landscaped boulevard much like that found along Sandifur Parkway.
To allow the City to accomplish the improvements, the City will need to have that
portion dedicated for future use as municipal right of way.
Page 42 of 125
City of Pasco, IS Division
OverviewMap
Item: Dedication ROW for Burn s RdApplicant: Leticia Rebolledo & O scar AvalosFile #: DE ED 2017-009 ±
SITEBurns Road
Snoqualmie Dr
Road 84Page 43 of 125
City of Pasco, IS Division
VicinityMap
Item: Dedication ROW for Burn s RdApplicant: Leticia Rebolledo & O scar AvalosFile #: DE ED 2017-009 ±
SITE
Burns Road
Page 44 of 125
After Recording,Return To:
City of Pasco,Washington
Attn:City Planner
525 North 3”’
Pasco,WA 99301
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION DEED
Tax Parcel No.116060173
Legal:See Below
THE GRANTOR(S),LETICIA REBOLLEDO and OSCAR AVAL_O§by donation
pursuant to RCW 35A.7 9.010,dedicates,conveys and quit claims to the GRANTEE,
THE CITY OF PASCO,a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington,for the
public use,as a public right—of—way,all interest in the land described as follows:
That portion of Lot 33 of Columbia Place,Phase 3 according to the Plat thereof
recorded in Volume D of Plats Page 261 and 261A,records of Franklin County,
Washington,described as follows:
Beginning at the True Point of Beginning,said point being the Northeast corner
of Lot 33,Columbia Place Phase 3;Thence South 01 degrees 33 minutes 51
seconds East for a distance of 13.80 feet;Thence South 89 degrees 40 minutes 25
seconds West for a distance of 50.92 feet;Thence South 89 degrees 38 minutes 09
seconds West for a distance of 39.10 feet;Thence North 01 degrees 33 minutes 51
seconds West for a distance of 13.83 feet;Thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 32
seconds East for a distance of 90.02 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
DATEDthis HQ dayof2017.
GRANT s _
‘r5§33?.,.c.t\<4>)\tllolt
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)2 ss.
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN )
On
‘
this day personally appeared before
me E!2 gm 5 5og_Q ,boggg Q9 ,to me known to be the individual(s)
described above and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as an
agent of the owner(s)of record,and acknowledged to me that he/she/they signed
the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he/she/they is/are authorized
to execute the said instrument.
Page 45 of 125
GIVEN under by hand and official seal this \L5 day of Q05 Q59 :3 3;,
2017.
Print Name:Kr \,;5&\L 3\/\oV\\<.$
NOTARY PUBLICin and for the State of Washington
Residing at:EQA g B
M C ''E ‘e;$10
V NotaryPubnc >
y omrnlsslon xplr S
1 La State Of VV8Shi?gtOn
KRYSTLEL.SHANKS
MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES .
January 5,202
Page 46 of 125
DATEDthis [Q dayof I ,2017.
GRAN ORS
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)2 ss.
COUNTY OF FRANKLIN )
On this day personally appeared before
me (mg ;i 1 N ,to me known to be the indiVidual(s)
described above and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as an
agent of the owner(s)of record,and acknowledged to me that he/she/they signed
the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed,for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned,and on oath stated that he/she/they is/are authorized
to execute the said instrument.
GIVEN under by hand and official seal this \Lo day of ,
2017.
Print Name:r 5 L L
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
Residing at:09444)
My Commission Expires:£S I L91 Q
Notary _
State of Washington
.KRYSTLEL SHANKS
MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES
January 5.2020
\-_\x\\-:\\\x\.\:\x\.\x~\N.\—
Page 47 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council November 2, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Richa Sigdel, Director
Finance
SUBJECT: 2018 Operating & Capital Projects Budget Ordinances - First Reading
I. REFERENCE(S):
2018 Preliminary Annual Operating & Capital Improvement Budget - Link
http://www.pasco-wa.gov/budget
Proposed 2018 Operating Budget Ordinance
Proposed 2018 Capital Projects Budget Ordinance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING
MOTION: I move for the first reading of Ordinance No. ____________, for
consideration of the City of Pasco Annual Operating Budget for the Year 2018.
MOTION: I move for the first reading of Ordinance No. ____________, for
consideration of the City of Pasco Capital Projects Budget for the Year 2018.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
$214,326,293 - Annual Operating Budget (Includes fund balance)
$33,049,735 - Capital Projects Budget
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City Council was provided a comprehensive briefing of the 2018 Preliminary
Budget, along with associated policy issues at the October 30, 2017 Special City
Council Meeting.
Consistent with state statute, and in furtherance of Council's goals with respect to
transparency and providing opportunities for community engagement and input, the
scheduled public hearing is being held for comment on the recommended 2018 budget.
Page 48 of 125
In the interest of time staff will provide a more condensed budget presentation, than
was provided at the workshop, in advance of the public hearing.
V. DISCUSSION:
Since the Preliminary Budget proposal on October 30, 2017, there have been no
changes to the proposed budgets.
Subject to the direction of Council, input from individual Councilmembers, or public
input received during the hearing may impact the final budget.
Second Reading and Adoption of Budget Ordinances is scheduled for November 20,
2017.
Page 49 of 125
WHEREAS, subsequent to due notice and public hearing thereon, the City Council of the City of Pasco has approved
an operating budget for the year 2018; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section One.The following budget containing the totals set forth for each fund for the year 2018 is hereby adopted.
EXPENDITURE REVENUE
010 GENERAL FUND 59,635,218$ 59,635,218$
110 CITY STREET FUND 2,344,269 2,344,269
120 ARTERIAL STREET FUND 1,502,746 1,502,746
125 I-182 CORRIDOR TRAFFIC IMPACT FUND 1,293,083 1,293,083
130 STREET OVERLAY FUND 4,693,097 4,693,097
14X COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT FUND 1,522,644 1,522,644
145 M.L. KING JR. COMMUNITY CENTER FUND 294,900 294,900
150 AMBULANCE SERVICES FUND 8,310,719 8,310,719
160 CITY VIEW CEMETERY FUND 286,947 286,947
161 BOULEVARD PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE FUND 2,335,392 2,335,392
165 ATHLETIC PROGRAM FUND 365,690 365,690
166 GOLF COURSE 1,912,000 1,912,000
170 SENIOR CENTER OPERATING FUND 351,061 351,061
180 MULTI-MODAL FACILITY FUND 472,847 472,847
182 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 2,500,000 2,500,000
185 RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAINTENANCE FUND 62,725 62,725
188 SPECIAL LODGING ASSESSMENT FUND 275,000 275,000
189 LITTER ABATEMENT FUND 27,201 27,201
190 REVOLVING ABATEMENT FUND 683,402 683,402
191 TRAC DEVELOPMENT & OPERATING FUND 493,147 493,147
192 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 2,748,937 2,748,937
193 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND REET 1ST QTR 5,336,745 5,336,745
194 ECONOMIC & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FUND 2,850,083 2,850,083
195 STADIUM / CONVENTION CENTER FUND 638,035 638,035
24X LID DEBT SERVICE FUND 490,199 490,199
367 GENERAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 21,985,145 21,985,145
4XX WATER / SEWER UTILITY FUND 56,819,926 56,819,926
510 EQUIPMENT RENTAL OPERATIONS FUND - GOVERNMENT TYPE 1,257,324 1,257,324
511 EQUIPMENT RENTAL OPERATIONS FUND - PROPRIETARY TYPE 551,943 551,943
515 EQUIPMENT RENTAL REPLACEMENT FUND - GOVERNMENT TYPE 12,150,939 12,150,939
516 EQUIPMENT RENTAL REPLACEMENT FUND - PROPRIETARY TYPE 5,819,051 5,819,051
52X MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE FUND 8,695,971 8,695,971
530 CENTRAL STORES FUND 12,511 12,511
605 CITY VIEW CEMETERY ENDOWMENT 516,729 516,729
610 OLD FIREMEN'S PENSION TRUST FUND 2,525,145 2,525,145
619 OLD FIRE MEDICAL (OPEB)2,565,522 2,565,522
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS 214,326,293$ 214,326,293$
Section Two.This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January 1, 2018.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 20th day of November, 2017.
ATTEST:
Matt Watkins, Mayor Daniela Erickson, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
FUND
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF PASCO OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 2018.
ORDINANCE NO.
City of Pasco 1 2018 BudgetPage 50 of 125
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE CITY OF PASCO CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 2018
WHEREAS, subsequent to due notice and public hearing thereon, the City Council for the City of Pasco has approved the following
Capital Project Budget for the year 2018; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS
Section One:
That the capital projects are hereby authorized as detailed. The following schedule summarizes newly authorized projects as well as
continuing projects and constitutes the Capital Projects Budget.
CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET FOR THE YEAR 2018
2018
Budget
General
Animal Control 803,000
City Hall Remodel 1,100,000
Community Center 900,000
Downtown Police Substation & Services Facility 100,000
PSK Facility Upgrades 96,000
Wayfinding and Signage 35,000
Relocation of Station 83 300,000
Station 84 400,000
Training Facility Site Work & Modular Building Installation 650,000
Total General 4,384,000
Irrigation
Chapel Hill Boulevard (Road 84 to Road 68)120,000
Total Irrigation 120,000
Park & Facilities
1st Avenue Center - Phase 2 180,000
Chapel Hill Park 20,000
Facilities Shop Remodel 150,000
Highland Park Restroom/Concession/Storage Building 10,000
Marina Dock Replacement 500,000
New Neighborhood Park - Rd 48 & Court 757,000
Park Restroom Installations 100,000
Pasco Sporting Complex - Softball Complex Updates 150,000
Peanuts Park Restoration 1,539,145
Sacajawea Heritage Trail - Levee Lowering 50,000
Schlagel Park Improvements 64,000
Total Park & Facilities 3,520,145
Transportation
Argent Road Widening (20th Ave to Road 44)150,000
Chapel Hill Blvd LID (Rd 68 to Rd 84)4,670,000
City Wide Traffic Signal Ph 2 300,000
Crescent Road 45,000
James Street Improvements 480,000
Lewis Street Overpass 1,100,000
Oregon Ave (SR397) - Phase 1 7,015,000
Road 68 Interchange Improvements 114,000
Road 84 Safe Walking Route Connection 215,000
Rowena Chess School Crossing 88,140
Total Transportation 14,177,140
Water
Annual System Improvements - Development 100,000
Annual Upsize - Development 100,000
Butterfield WTP PLC & Control Upgrades 500,000
Chapel Hill Boulevard (Road 68 to Road 84) - Watermain Main Upsize 920,000
Columbia Water Supply Project 2,584,450
Water Main Installation – Crescent-Chapel Hill/Sandifur Transmission Main 501,000
Waterline Extension—Schuman Lane (West from Road 96) 80,000
Total Water 4,785,450
Sewer
9th & WA Lift Station 830,000
Annual System Improvements - Development 100,000
Annual Upsize - Development 100,000
NW Area Sewer Transmission Main 2,500,000
Pearl Street Lift Station 223,000
Wastewater Treatment Plant PLCs and Controls Upgrade 750,000
West Pasco Trunk Sewer Relining (Transmission Main Rehabilitation – Rd 60 to Rd 100) 50,000
WWTP Facility Plan Capital Improvement Projects 500,000
Total Sewer 5,053,000
PWRF
Industrial Pump Station (IPS) Improvements 160,000
Kahlotus Hwy Sewer Force Main (Dietrich Lift Station)550,000
PWRF Drying Beds 300,000
Total PWRF 1,010,000
TOTAL CIP BUDGET 33,049,735
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
City of Pasco 114 2018 BudgetPage 51 of 125
Section Two:
This Ordinance is approved at the program level as shown below and shall be in full force and effect on January 1, 2018.
2018
Program Budget
General 4,384,000
Irrigation 120,000
Park & Facilities 3,520,145
Transportation 14,177,140
Water 4,785,450
Sewer 5,053,000
PWRF 1,010,000
TOTAL CIP BUDGET 33,049,735
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this ______ day of ____________________, 2017.
ATTEST:
__________________________________________________________
Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Matt Watkins, Mayor
Approved as to Form:_________________________
Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
City of Pasco 115 2018 BudgetPage 52 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 31, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Rezone: Kidwell Rezone, I-1 to I-2 (MF# Z 2017-005)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Ordinance
Vicinity Map
Report to Planning Commission
Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 9/21/17 & 10/19/17
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. _____, rezoning Lot 4, Binding Site Plan
2016-06 from I-1 (Light Industrial) to I-2 (Medium Industrial), and further, authorize
publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On September 21, 2017 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to
develop a recommendation for the City Council on the possible rezone of the vacant lot
located at the southwest corner of the PK Highway and Venture Road. The applicant
requested a rezone from I-1 (Light Industrial) to I-2 (Medium Industrial).
Following conduct of the hearing, the Planning Commission recommended the
property in question be rezoned from I-1 to I-2.
No written appeal of the Planning Commission’s recommendation has been received.
Page 53 of 125
V. DISCUSSION:
Land uses within the I-2 District are similar to those permitted in the I-1 District. The
notable exception being auto wrecking yards which are permitted in the I-2 District but
not in the I-1 District. The I-2 District has a considerably longer list of conditional
uses that require approval of a special permit before they can operate for business.
Page 54 of 125
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF P ASCO, WASHINGTON REZONING LOT 4,
BINDING SITE PLAN 2016-06 FROM I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO I-2 (MEDIUM
INDUSTRIAL).
WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification has been received and an open record hearing having been conducted by the Pasco Planning Commission upon such petition; and,
WHEREAS, that the effect of the requested change in zoning classification shall not be materially detrimental to the immediate vicinity; and,
WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner,
that: (A) the requested change for the zoning classification is consistent with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan; (B) the requested change in zoning classification is consistent with or
promotes the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan serving the general public interest
in the community; and (C) there has been a change in the neighborhood or community needs or
circumstances warranting the requested change of the zoning classification; and (D) the Planning
Commission developed findings which are hereby adopted by the City Council; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the
Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is
changed from I-1 (Light Industrial) to I-2 (Medium Industrial) for the real property as shown
in the Exhibit “1” attached hereto and described as follows:
Lot 4, Binding site Plan 2016-06
Section 2. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its
approval, passage and publication as required by law.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 6th day of November, 2017.
Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Page 55 of 125
Exhibit#1
Item: Rezone from I-1 to I-2Applicant: Tom KidwellFile #: Z 2017-005 ±
SITE
Venture RdPasco Kahlotus Rd
US-12
Com
mercial Ave
CITY LIMITS
Page 56 of 125
City of Pasco, IS Division
VicinityMap
Item: Rezone from I-1 to I-2Applicant: Tom KidwellFile #: Z 2017-005 ±
SITE
Venture RdPasco Kahlotus Rd
US-12
Com
mercial Ave
CITY LIMITS
Page 57 of 125
1
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: Z 2017-005 APPLICANT: Tom Kidwell
HEARING DATE: 9/21/2017 4320 W. Riverhaven St.
ACTION DATE: 10/19/2017 Pasco, WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: REZONE: Rezone from I-1 (Light Industrial) to I-2 (Medium
Industrial)
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: Lot 4, Binding Site Plan 2016-06
General Location: SW corner of Ventura Rd and the PK Highway
Property Size: 36 acres.
2. ACCESS: The site is accessible from Ventura Road, Kendall Drive and
the Pasco Kahlotus Road.
3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are currently serving the site.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The lot is currently zoned I-1 (Light industrial)
and is vacant. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as
follows:
NORTH: I-1 – Agriculture and Carrot Plant
SOUTH I-1 – Chemical Haulers, Onion Processers, Truss
Plant, Petroleum Supplier and an Electrical
Fabricator
EAST: I-1 – Agriculture
WEST: I-1 – Meat Cutting Facility and a “C” Store
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The plan encourages the concentration of
activities that are functionally and economically beneficial to each other.
ED-2-B encourages the development of a wide range of commercial uses
strategically located to support local and regional needs.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Based on the SEPA checklist,
the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations,
testimony at the public hearing and other information, a Determination
of Non-Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project.
Page 58 of 125
2
ANALYSIS
The proposed rezone site has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan for
more intense industrial uses for over 35 years. The site has also been zoned
for industrial activities for about 35 years. The site was originally zoned I-1 in
the County prior to annexation in 2013. The City Council recently approved a
special permit for the location of a ready-mix concrete plant on the site.
The Allocation of Land uses Table in the Comprehensive Plan indicates areas
designated for industrial uses are suitable for manufacturing, food processing,
hazardous material storage, transportation related facilities and the storage
and distribution of equipment and products. I-1, I-2 and I-3 zoning are
permissible within the Industrial Designation. Among other things the
Allocation table suggests industrial lands should be located convenient to the
regional transportation system, be near utilities and contain relatively flat land
suitable for heavy building sites. The site in question is within 1,000 feet of the
Lewis Street/ SR 12 Interchange, contains relatively flat ground, and is a
quarter of a mile from the largest electrical substation in the County.
The general area surrounding the site can be characterized as an industrial
area with land uses including a truss manufacturing plant, chemical haulers, a
petroleum product supplier and hauler, food processors, trucking firms, a large
BPA Substation, potato and onion warehouses, a regional garbage transfer
station (BDI), a industrial pipe supplier, the Oxarc facility and related
industrial facilities. The property was recently granted a special permit by the
City Council for the location and operation of a concrete ready-mix plant. The
operation of the referenced uses is associated with significant outdoor storage,
and higher levels of noise, odors, fumes, vibrations, dust and truck traffic.
The land uses permitted in the I-2 District are similar to those permitted in the
I-1 District with the notable exception of junkyards and auto wrecking yards
being permitted in the I-2 District. The I-2 District has a considerably longer
list of allowable conditional uses that require special permit review. Some of
these conditional uses include garbage dumping, rendering plants, acid
manufacturing, cement and line manufacturing, commercial composting and
asphalt batch plants.
The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in
PMC. 25.88.030. The criteria are listed below as follows:
1. The date the existing zone became effective:
The current zoning classification was established in in 2013 when the property
was annexed to the City. Prior to that time the property was zoned for industrial
uses in the County.
Page 59 of 125
3
2. The changed conditions, which are alleged to warrant other or additional
zoning:
The property has been in the City for the past four years. A major sewer line
was installed adjacent to the property after annexation in 2013 and a 16 inch
water line is located in Commercial Avenue. A water line was also extended in
Ventura Road in 2013. Other changes in the area include the expansion of the
trucking firms to the south that store and transport chemicals and petroleum
products, the approval of a special permit for the location and operation of a
concrete ready-mix plant, the expansion and location of other trucking firms, the
opening of the Oxarc facility and other industrial activities in the area.
3. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health,
safety and general welfare:
The site is located in an area that the community was planned for industrial
uses for over 35 years. Public infrastructure including sewer and water has
been installed in the area and sized for industrial needs. The Lewis Street
Interchange was designed for industrial traffic and is utilized by the BDI fleet of
trucks, the carrot plant trucks and other agricultural related facilities nearby
that have a heavy reliance on trucking. The Lewis Street Interchange is the
freeway connection to the Heritage Boulevard truck route and a connection to
the surrounding Counties. The rezone would support past industrial
development and would further implement the Comprehensive Plan which has
been adopted to advance the general welfare of the community.
4. The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property
and the Comprehensive Plan:
The rezone is consistent with the designation of the Comprehensive Plan and will
minimal impact on surrounding industrial properties.
5. The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted:
The proposed rezone may allow the property to be developed with uses that
would be compatible with and similar to the recently approved ready-mix facility.
If the property is not rezoned the owner may lose opportunities for development
that would support and complement the ready-mix plant.
STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Page 60 of 125
4
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report.
The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the
result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record
hearing.
1. The site is located at the southwest corner of the PK Highway (Pasco
Kahlotus Road) and Ventura Road.
2. The site contains 36 acres.
3. The site was granted a special permit by the City Council on September
5, 2017 for the location and operation of a concrete ready-mix plant. The
ready-mix plat is to be located on the southern third of the site.
4. The site is about 1,000 feet from the Lewis Street/SR 12 Interchange
providing convenient access to construction sites in a three county area.
5. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for industrial uses.
6. There are three industrial zones permitted under the industrial land use
designation. I-2 is one of those zones.
7. The site is currently zoned I-1 (Light Industrial).
8. Properties site is currently zoned I-1 (Light Industrial).
9. The general area surrounding the site can be characterized as an
industrial area with land uses including a truss manufacturing plant,
chemical haulers, a petroleum product supplier and hauler, food
processors, trucking firms, a large BPA Substation, potato and onion
warehouses, a regional garbage transfer station (BDI), a industrial pipe
supplier the Oxarc facility and related industrial facilities.
10. The site is near 8 potato/onion warehouses that generate foul smelling
odors at certain times of the year.
11. Portions of the site are about 800 feet from the freeway (SR-12) and the
truck traffic and noise associated with the traffic.
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions
based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.88.060. The criteria are as follows:
1. The proposal is in accordance with the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Page 61 of 125
5
The Comprehensive Plan has identified the site for industrial land uses for over
35 years. The industrial designation within the Comprehensive Plan allows
property to be zoned for I-1, I-2 and I-3 uses. I-3 zoning is reserved only for
Port facilities. The plan encourages the concentration of activities that are
functionally and economically beneficial to each other. ED-2-B encourages the
development of a wide range of industrial and commercial uses strategically
located to support local and regional needs.
2. The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will not be materially
detrimental.
The proposed I-2 zoning will permit additional industrial uses to locate on the
site. Most of the additional uses require a special permit hearing providing an
opportunity for placing mitigating conditions that may be needed for the benefit
of adjoining properties.
3. There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole.
There is merit in providing an opportunity for a greater range of commercial uses
on the property which may lead to the development of a lot that has remained
vacant and in a poor state of repair of the past 42 years.
4. Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant
adverse impacts from the proposal.
Most of the additional uses allowed under the I-2 District require special permit
review which provides an opportunity for the City to condition the uses if
necessary to mitigate any adverse impact. The regulation for salvage yards
provides a list mitigating measures related to screening and storage of parts.
The landscaping chapter of the zoning regulations provides additional mitigating
measures.
5. A Concomitant Agreement should be entered into between the City and
the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement.
A concomitant agreement is not needed.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact
and conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 19, 2017
staff report.
MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of
fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission
recommend the City Council rezone Lot 4, Binding Site Plan 2016-
06 from I-1 to I-2 as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Page 62 of 125
City of Pasco, IS Division
OverviewMap
Item: Rezone from I-1 to I-2Applicant: Tom KidwellFile #: Z 2017-005 ±
SITE Pasco Kahlotus RdUS-12
CITY LIMITS
E Lewis St
Page 63 of 125
City of Pasco, IS Division
VicinityMap
Item: Rezone from I-1 to I-2Applicant: Tom KidwellFile #: Z 2017-005 ±
SITE
Venture RdPasco Kahlotus Rd
US-12
Com
mercial Ave
CITY LIMITS
Page 64 of 125
Land UseMap
Item: Rezone from I-1 to I-2Applicant: Tom KidwellFile #: Z 2017-005 ±
SITE
Venture RdPasco Kahlotus Rd
US-12
Com
mercial Ave
CITY LIMITS
Industrial
Crop Field
Crop FieldIndustrial
Vacant
Page 65 of 125
ZoningMap
Item: Rezone from I-1 to I-2Applicant: Tom KidwellFile #: Z 2017-005 ±
SITE
Venture RdPasco Kahlotus Rd
US-12
Com
mercial Ave
CITY LIMITS
I-1
I-1
I-1
I-1
Page 66 of 125
Looking EastPage 67 of 125
Looking SouthPage 68 of 125
Looking WestPage 69 of 125
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/2017
B. Rezone Rezone from I-1 (Light Industrial) to I-2
(Medium Industrial) (Tom Kidwell) (MF# Z 2017-
005)
Chairwoman Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff.
Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the rezone application from I-1 to I-2. The
property owner owns several parcels along the PK Highway, Ventura Road and
Commercial Avenue. There was a hearing on this same site about a month ago for a
special permit to locate a ready-mix plant. The applicant now wishes to rezone the
property to I-2. This site has been included in the Comprehensive Plan for over 35
years for industrial development. Within the Comprehensive Plan the industrial
designation doesn’t specify what zoning district properties are to be zoned but that is
to take place through the hearing process. The industrial designation would allow
properties to be rezoned to I-1, I-2 and I-3, except I-3 is just reserved for the Port of
Pasco down along the river near the Sacagawea Park. The difference between I-1 and
I-2 zoning is mainly that in the I-2 zone, property owners can locate salvage yards,
junk yards, automobile wrecking yards and then the list of conditional uses would
require special permit are lengthy compared to the I-1 zone. I-2 zone conditional uses
would include: garbage dumps, rendering plants, acid manufacturing, cement and
lime manufacturing, commercial composting and asphalt batch plants. The
surrounding area does have more intense industrial uses. Just up the road is the
regional dump site for Basin Disposal. There are also food processors, warehouses for
storing potatoes and onions and at certain times of the year those warehouses can
have a very foul odor that you wouldn’t find in heavier commercial or light industrial
areas. Provided in the staff report is a list of findings of fact for review.
Commissioner Bowers asked about the Oxarc facility mentioned in the staff report and
if it was the name of a company.
Mr. McDonald responded yes, they are a welding supply facility.
Commissioner Alvarado voiced concern because across the highway there is
residential. He has heard complaints from residents in this area about odors so he is
worried if it is zoned I-2, it would only add to the problem.
Mr. McDonald replied that is why most of the foul smelling items are contained in the
conditional use section. If an asphalt batch plant wanted to come along or a
rendering plant, they would require an additional hearing and at the hearing stage the
Planning Commission can place conditions on that use or recommend denial. This
provides another step and safeguard for the community and that neighborhood with
the conditional use process.
Commissioner Alvarado asked if there was a process for letting those residents know
about the rezone application.
Page 70 of 125
Mr. McDonald said that there is a notification sent to property owners within 300 feet
of the proposed site and the residents in this case are well beyond 300 feet. There is a
notice placed in the newspaper and posted on the City’s website.
Commissioner Alvarado clarified that the residents near this proposed site yet were
past the 300 foot radius notification would have to know to check the paper.
Mr. McDonald replied that the City could send the residents an additional notice to
these residents specifically as an option.
Commissioner Alvarado said that he felt it would be important to these homeowners
because at this time he doubts most of them are aware.
Commissioner Portugal asked about the 300 foot radius notification and how that is a
State mandate. He asked for clarification on the rules.
Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, replied that this had come
up in the past and it involved a cell tower application. That specific concern was
taken to City Council through 2-3 workshop hearings and Council opted to maintain
the required distance consistent with State law and the rest of the applications and
cities in Washington State. He said he was unsure of which neighborhood nearby this
site Commissioner Alvarado was referring to but he thinks the nearest neighborhood
is 1,800 feet away.
Commissioner Alvarado said he believed that right across from Sunrise Estates there
is future development coming.
Mr. White responded that he wasn’t certain on the distances but from the edge of the
proposed site to Highway 12 is roughly 700-800 feet or more. One of the reasons City
Council decided not to change the 300 foot radius notification because it gets
extremely complicated and the likelihood of anyone within 2,100 feet worried about a
project that far away is slim.
Chairwoman Roach asked if there is a public notice that is posted on the property.
Mr. White said no – it is posted on the webpage, in the newspaper and sent directly to
property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the site.
Commissioner Bykonen clarified that the notice was sent to the property owner, not
necessarily the resident.
Tom Kidwell, 4320 River Haven, spoken on behalf of his application. The purpose of
this public hearing is only for the rezoning of the property. He will have to come back
through a public hearing for a special permit in order to locate an asphalt plant at this
location.
Page 71 of 125
Chairwoman Roach asked if he had someone interested in this site for a particular
use.
Mr. Kidwell responded that it was the same gentleman that was at the previous
month’s public hearing for a concrete plant.
Chairwoman Roach asked if the entirety of the site would be used for concrete and
asphalt.
Mr. Kidwell said yes. The name of the company is JMAC from Wenatchee, Washington
and from his understanding they run a very clean operation.
Chairwoman Roach asked if there was anything else he would like to state.
Mr. Kidwell answered that he would like the Commission to move forward with the
rezone so he can come back to the Planning Commission with the special permit
application which will involve more detail. The special permit cannot be requested
until a rezone has been approved.
Randy Hayden, Executive Director for the Port of Pasco, 1110 Osprey Pointe Blvd,
spoke on behalf of the rezone application. He stated that he was not in opposition of
the rezone but did have some concerns. The Port has been speaking with DNR who
owns the land to the northeast to purchase for a future industrial park, like the Pasco
Processing Center. His concern is if an asphalt plant locates at this site, which is the
interest expressed by the applicant, there could potentially be odors that would
detract from a food processor. He isn’t certain that it would be a deterrent and in
today’s standards there are probably stricter controls on asphalt plants, but he is
concerned it could still potentially detract from potential food processors. In terms of
the residential, he did feel that the proposed site is far enough away downwind of
odors that would come back to the houses so it shouldn’t be much of an issue. The
existing uses surrounding the property, such as the garbage dump and onion sheds,
are far enough away to the north and east that they don’t have the same character. If
it were allowed, he would ask that when the special permits come in that the
Commission is very careful on how they are compatible with the other types of uses.
The Port is trying to attract industry in Pasco and if it becomes unattractive to those
types of food processessors, he would hate to see the business lost. On the other
hand, a new asphalt plant would be good in Pasco. A lot of asphalt is used at the
airport and having competition in the area could be a good thing.
Chairwoman Roach responded that the Commission has already approved a special
permit for a concrete ready-mix plant for the southern portion of this site.
Mr. Hayden replied that he was aware of the approval of the concrete ready-mix plant
and didn’t see any issues with that type of activity.
With no further questions or comments the public hearing was closed.
Page 72 of 125
Commissioner Bowers asked if asphalt production was different than concrete.
Mr. McDonald answered yes.
Chairwoman Roach asked if there was an unpleasant odor created by asphalt mixing
plants.
Mr. McDonald said there was, especially with the older plants. The newer modern
plants try to control the odor.
Commissioner Bykonen added that she believed there was an asphalt company in
Richland on Lacey Road in case any of them were curious to check on the odors.
Commissioner Portugal asked Commissioner Bykonen if she smelled the odors and if
she could describe it.
Commissioner Bykonen said it smells like tar, such as when tarring a roof.
Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, said that in 2008 there
was an asphalt plant requested on the west side of town at the American Rock site.
The City required an environmental impact statement and the hearings were a big
deal. Through that process of the impact statement and the hearings, staff learned
quite a bit about asphalt plants and toured several, particularly the ones that heat the
aggregate now instead of the oil and tar. The new technique is far different than the
old technique that heated the oil, tar and aggregate at the same time. The old way
used to even emit a blue smoke the fumes were so strong and today it isn’t that way.
There are certainly process requirements that would have to be looked at to locate an
asphalt plant anywhere in the Pasco city limits.
Commissioner Mendez said he assumed that plant was not approved.
Mr. White responded that it was approved with several conditions but the company
was sold to American Rock and they aren’t interested in asphalt.
Commissioner Mendez asked if that site is located near Rivershore Estates. He said
that the City likely received a lot of comments.
Mr. White said the City received several.
Commissioner Alvarado asked if there was a quantified way to know the extent of the
potential smell or if a study has been done.
Mr. White said there are some “rule of thumbs” from what was learned in 2008 and
the quantity of odor is far less than from an old style of plant. The studies done in
2008 tried to quantify the amount of dilution of the odor that takes place based on the
distance away from the odor source. Past 600’-800’ from the odor source it is very
difficult for any detection to occur. The prevailing winds would also work in favor at
Page 73 of 125
this particular location because the winds would carry to an uninhabited area to the
east.
Commissioner Alvarado asked about the current odors the residents receive.
Mr. White said it was also a weather pattern and there is sometimes inversion where
the air doesn’t go anyplace which is why there is sometimes agrictultural smells, even
at City Hall. The odors typically happen when there is an inversion or fog.
Chairwoman Roach reminded the commission of condition #4 and that there are
additional protections in place as well as another hearing would be required for the
actual special permit for the asphalt plant, this application is for a rezone.
Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, to close the
public hearing on the proposed rezone and set October 19, 2017 as the date for
deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. The
motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/19/2017
A. Rezone Rezone from I-1 (Light Industrial) to I-2
(Medium Industrial) (Tom Kidwell) (MF# Z 2017-
005)
Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff.
Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the rezone application from I-1 to I-2. He
stated that there were no additional comments since the previous meeting.
Chairman Cruz reminded the Planning Commission that the discussion of asphalt
plants, which is what the applicant would propose to use the site for via special permit
if rezoned to I-2, has been covered to great extent in the past and that there would be
proper controls to ensure public health and safety.
Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, to adopt findings
of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 19, 2017 staff report.
The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, based on the
findings of fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission recommend the
City Council rezone Lot 4, binding Site Plan 2016-06 from I-1 to I-2 as recommended
by the Planning Commission. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 74 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 26, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Darcy Bourcier, Planner I
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Special Permit: Church in a C-3 Zone (MF# SP 2017-012)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Resolution
Vicinity Map
Report to Planning Commission
Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 9/21/2017 and 10/19/2017
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. _____, approving a special permit for
the location of a church in a C-3 zoning district at 3330 West Court Street, as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On September 21, 2017 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to take
public input regarding the proposal to locate a church at 3330 West Court Street, Suite
Q.
Following conduct of the hearing, the Planning Commission determined the proposal
to be reasonable and developed a recommendation to approve the location of the
church.
No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received.
Page 75 of 125
V. DISCUSSION:
The applicant is proposing to establish a church at 3330 West Court Street, Suite Q.
The location is in a C-3 (General Business) zoning district and is also located on the
back or non - street frontage side of the strip mall.
Churches require approval through the special permit process in all zoning districts.
The church will use the space on Sunday mornings and Wednesday evenings with
around twenty church-goers in attendance. Suite Q occupies approximately 1,000
square feet.
Page 76 of 125
City of Pasco, IS Division
VicinityMap
Item: Special Permit - ChurchApplicant: Pedro BautistaFile #: SP 2017-012 ±
SITECourt St
Road 34Marie StRoad 36Road 32Page 77 of 125
…
RESOLUTION NO._______
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR THE LOCATION OF A CHURCH
IN A C-3 ZONING DISTRICT AT 3330 WEST COURT STREET, SUITE Q.
WHEREAS, Pedro Bautista submitted an application for the location of a Church located at 3330
West Court Street, Suite Q (Tax Parcel #115 502 016); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 21, 2017 to review a
Special Permit for the proposed Church; and,
WHEREAS, following deliberations on October 19, 2017 the Planning Commission
recommended approval of a Special Permit for the Church with certain conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to Pedro Bautista for a Church in a C-3 Zoning
district under Master File # SP 2017-012 with the following conditions:
a. The space leased to the church must be maintained to conform with all “A”
occupancy requirements of the International Building Code;
b. The outside store front shall not be modified from its current condition with the
exception of a sign installed in conformance with a City approved sign permit;
c. The church shall not object to the transfer, renewal or issuance of a liquor license
for an existing or new establishment within 1,000 feet of the property;
d. The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco business license is not
obtained by May 1, 2018.
2. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 6th day of November, 2017.
_______________________________
Matt Watkins, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ _____________________________
Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Page 78 of 125
1
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP2017-012 APPLICANT: Pedro Bautista
HEARING DATE: 09/21/17 1327 N 24th Ave Apt 3A
ACTION DATE: 10/19/17 Pasco, WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church (Iglesia de Dios
Pentecostes “Casa de Milagros”) in a C-3
District
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: Parcel # 115-502-016: The West 264' of the North 330' of the NE
quarter of the NW quarter of the NW quarter Section 25, Township 9
North, Range 29 East W.M.
General Location: 3330 West Court Street, Suite Q
Property Size: Approximately 1.8 acres; suite around 1,000 square feet
2. ACCESS: The site has access from West Court Street and Road 34
3. UTILITIES: Municipal utilities currently serve the site.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-3 (General
Business) and contains various commercial suites within the existing
building. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows:
NORTH: CR – Commercial Strip Centers
SOUTH: C-3 – Office and Parking Lot
EAST: C-3 – U-Haul Storage Facility
WEST: C-3 – Auto Licensing Office and Parking Lot
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for future
commercial uses. The Plan does not specifically address churches, but
elements of the Plan encourage the promotion of orderly development
including the development of zoning standards for off-street parking and
other development standards. Policy LU-2-B of the Comprehensive Plan
encourages the support of facilities for educational and cultural
activities.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead
agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made
after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non-
Page 79 of 125
2
Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance is likely for
this application (WAC 197-11-355).
ANALYSIS
The applicant is seeking a special permit to allow the location of a church in a
multi-tenant commercial center at 3330 West Court Street. Churches are
defined in Pasco Municipal Code as “Unclassified Uses” which require a special
permit prior to locating in any zone within the City. The applicant proposes to
locate the church within Suite Q which occupies around 1,000 square feet of
floor area inside the building. One of the neighboring suites, Suite K, had
previously been used as a church, as the applicant at the time had been
granted a special permit in 2011. It has since ceased operation. Even though
Pedro Bautista is applying for an identical use within the same building, the
special permit that was granted in 2011 is personal to the initial applicant and
cannot be transferred.
The proposed site has been developed with a commercial structure since 1980.
The approximately 20,000 square foot building contains 17 suites which are
divided into two separate buildings that are nearly identical in size and layout.
The parcel contains 100 parking stalls which are divided into two parking
lots—one for each commercial building.
It is anticipated the Casa de Milagros Church will use the space on Sunday
mornings and Wednesday evenings with around twenty church-goers in
attendance. In terms of occupancy load, the proposed tenant space has a
maximum capacity of 113 people based on interior floor area. Off-street
parking for visitors will not be an issue, as many of the businesses in the
neighboring suites will be closed on Sunday mornings and Wednesday
evenings, providing plenty of surplus parking.
Furthermore, traffic generated by the church will occur mostly on Sunday
mornings when traffic is minimal and when many of the adjacent businesses
will be closed. Wednesday evening church activities generally generate less
traffic than Sunday morning meetings. The operations of churches generally
generate few complaints from adjoining property owners
A potential problem with a church locating in a commercial area is the fact that
some retail establishments or restaurants sell or serve liquor. There is a
concern some churches may object to the approval of liquor licenses nearby.
The issue is typically addressed by placing a condition on the Special Permit
approval limiting the church’s ability to object to a liquor license.
When this Special Permit item went before the Planning Commission on
September 21, 2017, Planning Commission felt that the applicant did not fully
understand the Special Permit’s conditions due to the language difference.
Page 80 of 125
3
Therefore, they decided to extend the public hearing to the next meeting on
October 19, 2017. At this time, staff believes that the applicant fully
understands the conditions, as they were explained to him in his first
language. It is expected that the Planning Commission will both close the
public hearing and make a formal recommendation to City Council on October
19.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report.
The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the
result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record
hearing.
1. Churches are unclassified uses requiring review through the special
permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district.
2. The proposed church site is zoned C-3 (General Business).
3. The proposed site is located at 3330 West Court Street.
4. The site is approximately 1.8 acres.
5. The site contains two identical 10,000 square foot multi-tenant
commercial structures.
6. The proposed tenant suite is around 1,000 square feet in floor area.
7. The site contains 100 off-street parking stalls.
8. The main access to the site is from West Court Street. Secondary access
is available from Road 34.
9. The proposed site has been developed with a commercial structure since
1980.
10. Suite K, a neighboring suite, had previously been granted a special
permit for a church in 2011 but has since ceased operation.
11. Church functions will occur on Sunday mornings and Wednesday
evenings.
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 and determine whether or
not the proposal:
Page 81 of 125
4
(1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives
and text of the Comprehensive Plan?
The Plan does not specifically address churches, but elements of the Plan
encourage the promotion of orderly development including the
development of zoning standards for off-street parking and other
development standards. Policy LU-2-B of the Comprehensive Plan
encourages the support of facilities for educational and cultural
activities.
(2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
The proposed use will have a minimal impact on public infrastructure.
Churches are generally used during off-peaks hours, on Sundays and
during evenings in the middle of the week. The church will use existing
City utilities and infrastructure.
(3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in
harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity?
Churches are typically located in or near residential areas. In this case,
all surrounding land uses are of a commercial nature. The site would
not be modified to appear any differently than retail businesses located
in the same building.
(4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design
discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general
vicinity or impair the value thereof?
The location and height of the existing structure has not discouraged the
development of permitted uses on surrounding properties in the past. No
exterior site modifications are proposed. Any prospective businesses
seeking to locate within the vicinity will not be affected by the proposed
church.
(5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to
nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or
flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the
district?
Churches are typically used infrequently, generally two or three days
per week and generate traffic during off-peak times such as Sunday
mornings and in evenings during the week. Increases in traffic will be
during off-peak hours and are unlikely to exceed levels the commercial
center experiences on a typical weekday. It is unlikely the effects of
church operation will be any more objectionable than other uses
Page 82 of 125
5
regularly permitted in a C-3 zone. Permitted uses in the C-3 zone
include: Heavy equipment sales and service, warehouses, auto sales
and service, etc.
(6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and
developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses
permitted in the district?
Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do
not endanger public health or safety and are generally not nuisance
generators.
APPROVAL CONDITIONS
1) The space leased to the church must be maintained to conform with all
“A” occupancy requirements of the International Building Code;
2) The outside store front shall not be modified from its current condition
with the exception of a sign installed in conformance with a City
approved sign permit;
3) The church shall not object to the transfer, renewal or issuance of a
liquor license for an existing or new establishment within 1,000 feet of
the property;
4) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco business
license is not obtained by May 1, 2018.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to close the hearing on the
proposed special permit and adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions
therefrom as contained in the October 19, 2017 staff report.
MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of
Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission
recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Pedro Bautista
for the location of a church at 3330 West Court Street, Suite Q with
conditions as contained in the October 19, 2017 staff report.
Page 83 of 125
City of Pasco, IS Division
VicinityMap
Item: Special Permit - ChurchApplicant: Pedro BautistaFile #: SP 2017-012 ±
SITECourt St
Road 34Marie StRoad 36Road 32Page 84 of 125
Land UseMap
Item: Special Permit - ChurchApplicant: Pedro BautistaFile #: SP 2017-012 ±
SITECourt St
Road 34Marie StRoad 36Road 32CommercialPost OfficeCommerc
ialSFDUsCommercial
SFDUs/Med. Density
SFDUsPage 85 of 125
ZoningMap
Item: Special Permit - ChurchApplicant: Pedro BautistaFile #: SP 2017-012 ±
SITECourt St
Road 34Marie StRoad 36Road 32C-3
C-1
R-1
CR R-2R-1
C-1C-1C-1
RS-12Page 86 of 125
Site
Page 87 of 125
Looking North Page 88 of 125
Looking East Page 89 of 125
Looking South Page 90 of 125
Looking West Page 91 of 125
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/17
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Special Permit Location of a Church in a C-3 District (Pedro Bautista) (MF# SP 2017-012)
Chairwoman Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the
special permit for the location of a church in a C-3 zoning district. Churches
require the special permit process regardless of zoning. This site may look
familiar as a site for a church because it was approved by the Commission in
2011 for a church in almost the same location on the back side of the strip
mall on the corner of Road 34 and Court Street. This is almost identical except
it involves a different suite in the building. The church will be roughly 1,000
square feet. The special permit that was granted in 2011 cannot be used for
this application because it contained a condition that stated it was personal to
the church applicant at that time rather than the locations. Staff would
recommend that the Commission not include that condition on this particular
special permit should they decide to recommend approval. There is plenty of
parking at this site and churches rarely, if ever, conflict with the typical
business day commercial traffic.
Commissioner Bowers asked if there was anything in the staff report about
bathrooms and if staff knew how many were available.
Mr. White responded that he did not know how many bathrooms were available
but one of the conditions is that they meet the International Building Codes so
it will be handled.
Pedro Bautista, 1327 N. 24th Avenue, Apt. 3A, spoke on behalf of his
application. Commissioner Alvarado translated on his behalf. He wanted to
make sure his congregation had a legal place to come pray and worship.
Commissioner Portugal asked the applicant in Spanish if he understood the
conditions contained in the staff report.
Mr. Bautista responded that he did not.
Chairwoman Roach stated that the Commission should go over the conditions
with the applicant to ensure he understood them clearly.
Page 92 of 125
Mr. White responded that staff can work with the applicant as there are several
employees available to translate.
Commissioner Portugal explained to the applicant to arrange a time with staff
to go over the conditions.
Chairwoman Roach asked if the Commission should continue the public
hearing to allow the applicant a chance to meet with staff and bring back any
questions or comments.
Mr. White replied that the Commission can continue the hearing.
Commissioner Mendez asked how many people would attend the church.
Mr. Bautista said only about 6 people.
Chairwoman Roach asked if they plan to expand.
Mr. Bautista responded that they are hoping to grow. He asked if he would
have access to the building.
Commissioner Portugal said once the permit is issued which could be 1-2
months since it has to come back to the Planning Commission and to Council.
Mr. Bautista said that he understood.
Commissioner Alvarado reiterated everything in Spanish for the applicant.
Commissioner Mendez moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to
continue the public hearing to the October 19, 2017 Planning Commission
meeting for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for City
Council. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 93 of 125
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/19/17
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Special Permit Location of a Church in a C-3 District (Pedro Bautista) (MF# SP 2017-012) – Continued from September 21, 2017 meeting
Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Darcy Bourcier, Planner I, discussed the special permit application for a
church in a C-3 district. She explained that this item was continued from the
September 21, 2017 meeting because the Planning Commission wanted to give
the applicant a chance to go over the conditions with Spanish speaking staff to
ensure he fully understood the conditions prior to approval of the special
permit. Since that meeting, the applicant has met with bilingual staff to go
over the staff report. There were no additional changes to the report since the
previous meeting.
Pedro Bautista, 1327 N. 24th Avenue, Apt. 3A, spoke on behalf of his
application and stated that he understood and would comply with the
conditions contained in the staff report.
With no further questions or comments the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Mendez asked to abstain from voting on this item but Rick
White, Community & Economic Development Director, explained that per the
City Attorney, it is not proper form to abstain after hearing the public
testimony. The proper form would to have been to have made a declaration at
the beginning of the meeting and then step out of the Council Chambers
during the hearing.
Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Alvarado, to close
the hearing on the proposed special permit and adopt findings of fact and
conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 19, 2017 staff report. The
motion passed 5 to 1 with Commissioner Mendez dissenting.
Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, based on
the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom the Planning Commission
recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Pedro Bautista for the
location of a church at 3330 West Court Street, Suite Q with conditions as
Page 94 of 125
contained in the October 19, 2017 staff report. The motion passed 5 to 1 with
Commissioner Mendez dissenting.
Page 95 of 125
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council October 31, 2017
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager
Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
Regular Meeting: 11/6/17
FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Preakness Ridge (MF# PP 2017-008)
I. REFERENCE(S):
Proposed Resolution
Overview Map
Vicinity Map
Preliminary Plat
Report to the Planning Commission
Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 9/21/17 & 10/19/17
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.______, approving the Preliminary Plat
for Preakness Ridge.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
On September 21, 2017 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to
develop a recommendation for the City Council on the preliminary plat for Preakness
Ridge. The proposed plat is located east of Road 84 and south of the future extension
of Chapel Hill Boulevard.
Following the hearing, the Planning Commission determined that with conditions, the
preliminary plat should be recommended for approval. The recommended conditions
are contained in the attached resolution.
Page 96 of 125
No written appeal of the Planning Commission’s recommendation has been received.
V. DISCUSSION:
The proposed plat contains approximately 12 acres and occupies the last remaining R-3
property on the easterly end of Chapel Hill Boulevard. The developer is planning on
developing a multi-family neighborhood similar to the Columbia Villas development
or the Island Estates row home development.
The property owner previously improved the north half of Chapel Hill Boulevard in
anticipation in developing the 12 acre site for multi-family housing.
Page 97 of 125
RESOLUTION NO.______
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT
FOR PREAKNESS RIDGE.
WHEREAS, RCW 58.17 enables the City to uniformly administer the process of
subdividing property for the overall welfare of the community; and,
WHEREAS, owners and developers of property situated in the South half of Section 15,
Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., have requested approval of a preliminary plat; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Preakness
Ridge plat and developed findings related thereto and said findings are hereby adopted by the
City Council; and,
WHEREAS, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission found the proposed
plat promoted the general welfare of the community and recommended said preliminary plat be
approved with conditions; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
That the preliminary plat for Preakness Ridge located in the South half Section 15, Township 9
North, Range 29, East W.M., is hereby approved with the following conditions:
1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections.
2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing
shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s).
3. The developer shall install an eight-foot masonry wall along the freeway right-of-way.
The wall details must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. All final
Plats shall include a note that clearly indicates the maintenance responsibility for the
freeway wall is the responsibility of the property owners adjoining the wall.
4. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless
otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD.
5. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District
statement: “The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat
is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary
junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD’s primary and secondary distribution system in
accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance
payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to
PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat”.
6. The Developer must coordinate with the Franklin County PUD to ensure all road and
access easements to the substation adjacent the east boundary line of the plat are open
and unencumbered.
7. The cul de sac at the east end of Chapel Hill Boulevard must be squared to the southeast
to provide additional right-of-way access to the storm water pond to the south.
Page 98 of 125
Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 6th day of November, 2017.
__________________________
Matt Watkins, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________ _____________________________
Daniela Erickson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Page 99 of 125
Item: Preakness Ridge 86-Lot Preliminary PlatApplicant: Big Sky Developers LLCFile #: PP 2017-008OverviewMapSITEPage 100 of 125
Item: Preakness Ridge 86-Lot Preliminary PlatApplicant: Big Sky Developers LLCFile #: PP 2017-008VicinityMapSITEPage 101 of 125
38' PAVT 60' ROW
S66° 57' 25"E 1703.73'N23° 02' 35"E300.06'S66° 57' 20"E 1185.17'
S72° 42' 53"E
199.78'S62° 13' 05"E 145.67'
CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD
PIMLICO DRSR 182
ROAD A
ROAD B5,274
S.F.
7
3,938
S.F.
9
3,938
S.F.
11
4,945
S.F.
1
4,484
S.F.
3
7,625
S.F.
5
3,938
S.F.
13
3,938
S.F.
15
3,938
S.F.
17
11,476
S.F.
48
5,279
S.F.
44
6,298
S.F.
45
3,938
S.F.
23
3,938
S.F.
39
3,938
S.F.
25
3,938
S.F.
41
3,938
S.F.
27
4,095
S.F.
29
4,095
S.F.
31
4,095
S.F.
33
3,938
S.F.
19
4,095
S.F.
35
9,320
S.F.
50
3,938
S.F.
21
3,938
S.F.
37
6,666
S.F.
54
6,835
S.F.
52
6,557
S.F.
55
8,221
S.F.
58
3,937
S.F.
62
3,937
S.F.
68
3,937
S.F.
64
3,937
S.F.
66
4,476
S.F.
59
3,937
S.F.
78
3,937
S.F.
74
3,937
S.F.
72
3,937
S.F.
70
3,937
S.F.
76
3,938
S.F.
83
3,937
S.F.
80
3,937
S.F.
82
4,690
S.F.
86
38'
PAVT
3,938
S.F.
2
5,400
S.F.
4
6,036
S.F.
6
4,095
S.F.
8
3,938
S.F.
10
3,938
S.F.
12
3,938
S.F.
14
3,938
S.F.
16
3,938
S.F.
18
3,938
S.F.
20
3,938
S.F.
22
3,938
S.F.
24
3,938
S.F.
26
3,938
S.F.
28
4,095
S.F.
30
4,095
S.F.
32
4,095
S.F.
34
4,095
S.F.
36
3,938
S.F.
38
3,938
S.F.
40
3,938
S.F.
42
3,938
S.F.
43
7,993
S.F.
46
6,580
S.F.
47
8,555
S.F.
51
6,401
S.F.
53
6,554
S.F.
56
6,266
S.F.
57
3,937
S.F.
60
3,937
S.F.
61
3,937
S.F.
63
3,937
S.F.
65
3,937
S.F.
67
3,937
S.F.
69
3,937
S.F.
71
3,937
S.F.
73
3,937
S.F.
75
3,937
S.F.
77
3,937
S.F.
79
3,937
S.F.
81
3,938
S.F.
84
3,938
S.F.
85
TPN 117470139
CITY OF PASCO
(FUTURE CITY PARK)
12,999
S.F.
49
TPN 117250038
FRANKLIN
COUNTY PUD #1
(SUBSTATION)ROAD C5' SW
10' UTIL ESMT
10' UTIL ESMT
60'
ROW
R56'
R45'
5' SW
105'34'22'91'48'37'105'37'112'22'6'56'1
5
8
'20'13
9
'65'32'82'116'
2 1 '105'4'2 5 '
69'39'105'39'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'
38'
37'105'38'105'38'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'37'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'39'
39'39'105'39'105'39'
39'39'105'39'105'39'
39'39'105'39'105'39'
39'39'105'39'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'32'5'105'37'
38'74'116'9'18'157'26'
83'90'
135'
2
5'
147'22'75'
22
3
'22'134'
2
1
6
'21'61'
72'161'
2 1 '97'141'3 8 '
31'5 2'68'148'3
8'179'11'1 8'27'
38'38'176'1'37'173'37'
34'4'3 7 '2'180'38'165'37'18'
27'101'8 6'96'23'31'105'30'
2
2'71'3 1 '24'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'22 '31'
31'22'77'S0° 30
'
24"W359.44
'
PROPOSED UTILITIES
(TYP)
CHAPEL HILL PHASE 6 SUBDIVISION
30'
ROW
60'
ROW
38'
PAVT
30'
ROW R55.00'
S86°
2
7'
2
5"
W
110.1
9'
ROADS / WATER / IRRIGATION/SEWER/STORM:
CITY OF PASCO
(UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION PROPOSED TO MANAGE STORMWATER)
POWER:
FRANKLIN PUD
NATURAL GAS:
CASCADE NATURAL GAS COMPANY
COMMUNICATION:
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS & CENTURY LINK
UTILITIES / SERVICES
AHBL, INC
5804 RD 90 SUITE H
PASCO, WA 99301
CONTACT: JOHN BECKER, PLS
PHONE: 509-380-5883
SURVEYOR:
NAD 1983
WASHINGTON STATE PLANE SOUTH PROJECTION, BASED
ON GPS OBSERVATIONS USING WSRN AND GEOID 2012A.
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT ARE US SURVEY FEET.
CITY OF PASCO VERTICAL BENCHMARK PSI 25-34
BRASS DISK AT WEST WERNETT ROAD AND ROAD 52.
ELEV = 381.42
VERTICAL DATUM
BASIS OF BEARING
AHBL, INC
5804 RD 90, SUITE H
PASCO, WA 99301
CONTACT: CALEB STROMSTAD, PE
PHONE: 509-380-5883
CIVIL ENGINEER:
BIG SKY DEVELOPERS
12406 EAGLE REACH COURT
PASCO, WA 99301
CONTACT: DAVID GREENO
APPLICANT:
PER OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
ORDER NO. BF4922 DATED JULY 7, 2017
A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF
INTERSTATE FREEWAY 182 (I-182) DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE VILLAGES AT
CHAPEL HILL ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN
VOLUME D OF PLATS, PAGE 298, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 23°02'35” EAST, 270.00 FEET TO THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF I-182; THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF I-182, SOUTH 66°57'25” EAST,
2509.73 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE
LEAVING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF I-182 AND
FOLLOWING SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 00°30'24” WEST, 359.44 FEET TO
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY IRRIGATION
DISTRICT CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE
AND FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID CANAL
RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE FOLLOWING COURSES: THENCE NORTH 72°42'53”
WEST 199.78 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A
286.48 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE RADIUS
OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 17°17'07” EAST) THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 10°29'48” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 52.48 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 62°13'05” WEST 176.62 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 71.62 FOOT RADIUS
TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT (THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH
27°46'55” WEST) THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°16'53” FOR AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 41.60 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY
LINE, NORTH 12°33'35” WEST, 20.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°57'25”
WEST, 128.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS
NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT (THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS
NORTH 23°02'35” EAST) THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 116°08'13”
FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 111.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86°27'25”
WEST, 110.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66°57'25” WEST, 1185.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH
23°02'35” EAST, 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°57'25” WEST, 724.49
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66°57'25” WEST, 81.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY
OF PASCO IN DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1819180.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED LOT BOUNDARY
PROPOSED EASEMENT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
LAND USE TABLE
SITE AREA:12.64 ACRES
TOTAL TWO-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL LOTS:86 LOTS
MINIMUM LOT AREAS:3,937 SF
MAXIMUM LOT AREAS:12,999 SF
AVERAGE LOT AREA:4,744 SF
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY 3.27 ACRES
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 60 120
1" = 60 FEET
30
5804 Road 90, Suite H, Pasco, WA 99301
509.380.5883TEL 509.380.5883FAX www.ahbl.comWEB
TACOMA SEATTLE SPOKANE TRI-CITIES
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
R
1
TCSKDMCTS
AUGUST 23, 2017
PRELIMINARY PLAT
2170169.10
12406 EAGLE REACH COURT
PASCO, WA 99301
BIG SKY DEVELOPERS
PREAKNESS RIDGE
A PORTION OF THE N 1/2 AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 15, TWN. 09 N., RGE. 29 E. W.M.
CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PREAKNESS RIDGE - PRELIMINARY PLAT
DATE: August 22, 2017 FILENAME: Q:\2017\2170169\10_CIV\CAD\2170169-PRELIMINARY PLAT.dwg
PRELIMINARY PLAT
C0.1
1RD 68ARGENT RD
SR
1
8
2
CHAPEL HILL BLVD
RD 60RD 57N
SITE
EXISTING CONTOUR
FOUND MONUMENT
SET NAIL AND WASHER
BOLLARD
SIGN
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
STORM CATCH BASIN
STORM MANHOLE
GAS METER
GAS VALVE
POWER TRANSFORMER
GUY ANCHOR
UTILITY POWER POLE
JUNCTION BOX
POWER METER
LUMINAIRE
TELEPHONE RISER
TELEPHONE VAULT
FIRE HYDRANT
IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
WATER METER
WATER VALVE
POWER VAULT
STORM LINE
SEWER LINE
WATER LINE
GAS LINE
ELECTRICAL LINE
COMMUNICATION LINE
OVERHEAD UTILITIES
FENCE
UNKNOWN VAULT
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
PROPOSED PLAT WILL BE DUPLEXES WITH ZERO (SHARED WALL) LOT LINES.
PROPOSED LAND USE
EXISTING EASEMENT
08/23/2017
Page 102 of 125
1
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: PP 2017-008
HEARING DATE: 9/21/2017
ACTION DATE: 10/19/2017
APPLICANT: Big Sky Developers LLC
12406 Eagle Reach Ct
Pasco, WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Preakness Ridge, 86-Lot Multi-Family Subdivision
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: That portion of the South half of Section 15, Township 9 North
Range 29 East, WM included in Parcel # 117470138
General Location: 5400 to 5600 Block of Chapel Hill Boulevard
Property Size: 12.64 Acres
Number of Lots Proposed: 86 lots for zero lot line construction
Square Footage Range of Lots: 3,937 ft² to 12,999 ft²
Average Lot Square Footage: 4,744 ft²
2. ACCESS: The property will have access from Chapel Hill Boulevard.
3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer service are available in Chapel
Hill Boulevard.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-3 (High Density
Residential) Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows:
NORTH: R-1 – I-182 is directly north & Loviisa Farms is north
of the freeway
SOUTH: R-3 & R-1 – Single Family
EAST: RT – PUD Substation
WEST R-3 – Future Park and an Apartment complex
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is
intended for mixed residential development. According to the
Comprehensive Plan, mixed residential development means 5 to 20
dwelling units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future land
use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II, page 17)
encourages development of lands designated for mixed residential uses
when or where: sewer is available, the location is convenient to major
circulation routes, the site serves as a transition between more intense
uses and low density uses, and when there is a market demand. Policy
H-1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership and Goal H-2
suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for
residents of the community. Goal LU-2 encourages the maintenance of
Page 103 of 125
2
established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that
are safe and enjoyable places to live.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Based on the SEPA checklist, the
adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations,
testimony at the public hearing and other information, a Determination
of Non-Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project.
ANALYSIS
The project site is located between I-182 and Chapel Hill Boulevard west of a
PUD substation and east of the Villages at Chapel Hill and a future City Park.
Road 60, south of the Stone Gate Apartments and east of Columbia Place. The
site is relatively flat and slopes slightly from the north to the south. The site is
vacant with a combination of bare ground and native and non-native grasses
and other vegetation.
The site was initially designated for mixed residential development under the
Comprehensive Plan in 1982. The R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning
was established in 2003 prior to the development of the Chapel Hill subdivision
8in 2005. The Chapel Hill subdivision contains a mix of R-4, R-3 R-1 and C-1
zoning.
The applicant is proposing to subdivide the site into 86 lots to allow the
construction of 43 duplexes. Each duplex would occupy two lots with the
common lot line dividing each unit. This proposal is identical to the process
that was used for the development of the Island Estates Row Homes in the
Island Estates subdivision (Phase 8), Mediterranean Villas and Columbia Villas
Phases 1, 2 and 3. Each of these subdivisions was zoned for multi-family
development and platted into individual lots. The lots lines within these
subdivisions became the common boundary line separating the multi-family
dwelling units built therein.
The property site is located along the south right-of-way line of I-182. For most
of the day considerable noise is generated from the freeway traffic
LOT LAYOUT: The proposed Plat contains 86 residential lots and one future
commercial lot. The lots vary in size from 3,937 square feet to 12,999 square
feet. The proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the R-4
zoning of the site. R-3 zoning permits the development of one dwelling unit per
1,500 square feet of lot area for multi-family type structures.
RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets which will be dedicated.
Page 104 of 125
3
UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer lines are located in Chapel Hill
Boulevard. The developer will be responsible for extending utilities into the
Plat. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage
of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined
during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction
purposes are larger than the required easements; therefore the front yard
easements will not diminish the buildable area of the lots.
The Engineering Division will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants
and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire
hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of
500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are
located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of 300 feet on
residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets.
The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the
road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street.
STREET NAMES: The one street name need for the plat will follow the race
track theme of the Chapel Hill subdivision.
IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines
as a part of the infrastructure improvements.
WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for
subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115. and
Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the
property owner/developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof as
established in PMC Chapter 3.07. The Public Works Director may waive the fee
if the developer mixes a soil additive in the ground that provides 30% retention
of irrigation water.
FINDINGS OF FACT
State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning
Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision
will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the
community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact":
Prevent Overcrowding: Density requirements of the R-3 zone are designed to
address overcrowding concerns. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property
in question be developed with 5 to 20 dwelling units per acre. The proposed
Plat has a density of less than 7 units per acre. No more than 60 percent of
each lot is permitted to be covered with structures per the R-3 zoning
standards.
Page 105 of 125
4
Parks Opens Space/Schools: A City park site is located directly west of the
site. The Parks Division will be improving the park next year. The City is
required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are
being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the
School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school
impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the
requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school
impact fee in the amount of $4,525 will be charged for each new dwelling unit
at the time of building permit issuance.
Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The Plat is laid out for multi-
family development as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum
density permitted under the Comprehensive Plan is 20 dwelling units per acre.
The developer is proposing a density of 6.80 units per acre. The proposed
subdivision will complete the development of residential land within the Chapel
Hill subdivision.
Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community
through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time
homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to
current City standards and to the standards of the American’s with Disabilities
Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of all intersection will be installed
with the construction of the road improvements
Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the Plat will be
provided with water, sewer and other utilities.
Provision of Housing for State Residents: This Preliminary Plat contains 86
residential building lots, providing an opportunity for the construction of 43
duplexes units containing a total of 86 new dwelling units.
Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitations and building
setbacks will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to
each lot.
Proper Access & Travel: The streets through and adjoining the Plat have been
or will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is
maintained to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by
Chapel Hill Boulevard and Saratoga Lane. The Preliminary Plat was submitted
to the Transit Authority for review. (The discussion under “Safe Travel” above
applies to this section also.)
Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates
the plat site for mixed residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive
Page 106 of 125
5
Plan encourages the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City
strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents.
Other Findings:
• The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary.
• The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban
densities to occur within the Urban Growth Boundaries.
• The site slopes slightly to the east and south.
• The site is vacant with a combination of bare ground and native and
non-native grasses and other vegetation.
• The site is not considered a critical area a mineral resource area or a wet
land.
• The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for mixed residential
development.
• Mixed residential development is described in the Comprehensive Plan as
five to twenty dwelling units per acre.
• The developer is proposing 6.8 dwelling units per acre.
• The site is zoned R-3 (Medium Density Residential).
• The site was zoned R-3 in 2003.
• The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the
development of a variety of residential densities and housing types.
• The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the
interconnection of neighborhood streets to provide for the disbursement
of traffic.
• The interconnection of neighborhood streets is necessary for utility
connections (looping) and the provision of emergency services.
• The neighborhood is connected to the community by way of Chapel Hill
Boulevard and Saratoga lane.
• Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed
subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 572
vehicle trips per day.
• RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate
provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is
approved.
• The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling
new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation
fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012.
• Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees
address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for
schools.
Page 107 of 125
6
• Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with
the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City
Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water,
sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water
retention. The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps are completed
with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval.
Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses
except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street
improvements.
• All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are
required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum.
• All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be
disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City
of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required
to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The
developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties
required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the
Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the
agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for
construction plans.
• The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property
owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner
that does not injure, annoy or endanger the comfort and repose of other
property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during
times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including
houses.
• Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and
submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in
accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing
Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division.
This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan
approval.
• The project site is adjacent to I-182 which is a busy freeway that can
generate considerable noise during much of the day.
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
(P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not:
(1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys,
other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks,
Page 108 of 125
7
playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for
safe walking conditions for students and other public needs;
The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco
Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering
Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure
improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general
welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for
streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of
right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the Franklin County PUD,
the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable and Ben-Franklin
Transit Authority for review and comment.
Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school
mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of
building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of
RCW 58.17.110. The Chapel Hill development previously provided the City with
a five acre park site near the northeast corner of Chapel Hill Boulevard and
Saratoga Lane. Utilities have been stubbed to the park site and all street
improvements have been completed. The Parks Division will fully develop the
park site next year.
(2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and
land use patterns in the area;
The proposed Plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for the
looping of utilities and interconnectivity of streets as supported in the
Comprehensive Plan.
(3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and
narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan;
The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for mixed residential
development. Mixed residential development is described as 5 to 20 dwelling
units per acre in the text of the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of
the Plan encourages the promotion of a variety of residential densities and
suggests the community should support the advancement of programs
encouraging home ownership. The Plan also encourages the interconnection of
local streets for inter-neighborhood travel for public safety as well as providing
for traffic disbursement.
(4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any
applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City
Council;
Page 109 of 125
8
Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the
form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the
policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above.
(5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the
subdivision regulations.
The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and
discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact
indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the
subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e.: school
impact fees are paid.)
(6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed
subdivision.
The proposed Plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City
standards designed to insure the health, safety and general welfare of the
community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through
development of this Plat. These factors will insure the public use and interest
are served.
TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street
intersections.
2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of
yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final
plat(s).
3. The developer shall install an eight-foot masonry wall along the freeway
right-of-way. The wall details must be included on the subdivision
construction drawings. All final Plats shall include a note that clearly
indicates the maintenance responsibility for the freeway wall is the
responsibility of the property owners adjoining the wall.
4. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all
streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD.
5. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility
District statement: “The individual or company making improvements on
a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all
trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill
for the PUD’s primary and secondary distribution system in accordance
with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full
advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary
utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any
electrical service to or within the plat”.
Page 110 of 125
9
6. The Developer must coordinate with the Franklin County PUD to ensure
all road and access easements to the substation adjacent the east
boundary line of the plat are open and unencumbered.
7. The cul de sac at the east end of Chapel Hill Boulevard must be squared
to the southeast to provide additional right-of-way access to the storm
water pond to the south.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as
contained in the October 19, 2017 staff report.
MOTION: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted,
the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the
Preliminary Plat for Preakness Ridge, with conditions as listed in
the October 19, 2017 staff report.
Page 111 of 125
Item: Preakness Ridge 86-Lot Preliminary PlatApplicant: Big Sky Developers LLCFile #: PP 2017-008OverviewMapSITEPage 112 of 125
Item: Preakness Ridge 86-Lot Preliminary PlatApplicant: Big Sky Developers LLCFile #: PP 2017-008VicinityMapSITEPage 113 of 125
Item: Preakness Ridge 86-Lot Preliminary PlatApplicant: Big Sky Developers LLCFile #: PP 2017-008Land UseMapSITEFutureParkSFDUsSFDUsVacantVacantVac.VacPowerUtilityFDIC CanalPage 114 of 125
Item: Preakness Ridge 86-Lot Preliminary PlatApplicant: Big Sky Developers LLCFile #: PP 2017-008ZoningMapSITER-3R-1R-S-1R-1RTRS-20FDIC CanalPage 115 of 125
38' PAVT 60' ROW
S66° 57' 25"E 1703.73'N23° 02' 35"E300.06'S66° 57' 20"E 1185.17'
S72° 42' 53"E
199.78'S62° 13' 05"E 145.67'
CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD
PIMLICO DRSR 182
ROAD A
ROAD B5,274
S.F.
7
3,938
S.F.
9
3,938
S.F.
11
4,945
S.F.
1
4,484
S.F.
3
7,625
S.F.
5
3,938
S.F.
13
3,938
S.F.
15
3,938
S.F.
17
11,476
S.F.
48
5,279
S.F.
44
6,298
S.F.
45
3,938
S.F.
23
3,938
S.F.
39
3,938
S.F.
25
3,938
S.F.
41
3,938
S.F.
27
4,095
S.F.
29
4,095
S.F.
31
4,095
S.F.
33
3,938
S.F.
19
4,095
S.F.
35
9,320
S.F.
50
3,938
S.F.
21
3,938
S.F.
37
6,666
S.F.
54
6,835
S.F.
52
6,557
S.F.
55
8,221
S.F.
58
3,937
S.F.
62
3,937
S.F.
68
3,937
S.F.
64
3,937
S.F.
66
4,476
S.F.
59
3,937
S.F.
78
3,937
S.F.
74
3,937
S.F.
72
3,937
S.F.
70
3,937
S.F.
76
3,938
S.F.
83
3,937
S.F.
80
3,937
S.F.
82
4,690
S.F.
86
38'
PAVT
3,938
S.F.
2
5,400
S.F.
4
6,036
S.F.
6
4,095
S.F.
8
3,938
S.F.
10
3,938
S.F.
12
3,938
S.F.
14
3,938
S.F.
16
3,938
S.F.
18
3,938
S.F.
20
3,938
S.F.
22
3,938
S.F.
24
3,938
S.F.
26
3,938
S.F.
28
4,095
S.F.
30
4,095
S.F.
32
4,095
S.F.
34
4,095
S.F.
36
3,938
S.F.
38
3,938
S.F.
40
3,938
S.F.
42
3,938
S.F.
43
7,993
S.F.
46
6,580
S.F.
47
8,555
S.F.
51
6,401
S.F.
53
6,554
S.F.
56
6,266
S.F.
57
3,937
S.F.
60
3,937
S.F.
61
3,937
S.F.
63
3,937
S.F.
65
3,937
S.F.
67
3,937
S.F.
69
3,937
S.F.
71
3,937
S.F.
73
3,937
S.F.
75
3,937
S.F.
77
3,937
S.F.
79
3,937
S.F.
81
3,938
S.F.
84
3,938
S.F.
85
TPN 117470139
CITY OF PASCO
(FUTURE CITY PARK)
12,999
S.F.
49
TPN 117250038
FRANKLIN
COUNTY PUD #1
(SUBSTATION)ROAD C5' SW
10' UTIL ESMT
10' UTIL ESMT
60'
ROW
R56'
R45'
5' SW
105'34'22'91'48'37'105'37'112'22'6'56'1
5
8
'20'13
9
'65'32'82'116'
2 1 '105'4'2 5 '
69'39'105'39'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'
38'
37'105'38'105'38'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'37'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'39'
39'39'105'39'105'39'
39'39'105'39'105'39'
39'39'105'39'105'39'
39'39'105'39'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'38'105'37'
38'37'105'32'5'105'37'
38'74'116'9'18'157'26'
83'90'
135'
2
5'
147'22'75'
22
3
'22'134'
2
1
6
'21'61'
72'161'
2 1 '97'141'3 8 '
31'5 2'68'148'3
8'179'11'1 8'27'
38'38'176'1'37'173'37'
34'4'3 7 '2'180'38'165'37'18'
27'101'8 6'96'23'31'105'30'
2
2'71'3 1 '24'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'38'105'38'105'38'
38'22 '31'
31'22'77'S0° 30
'
24"W359.44
'
PROPOSED UTILITIES
(TYP)
CHAPEL HILL PHASE 6 SUBDIVISION
30'
ROW
60'
ROW
38'
PAVT
30'
ROW R55.00'
S86°
2
7'
2
5"
W
110.1
9'
ROADS / WATER / IRRIGATION/SEWER/STORM:
CITY OF PASCO
(UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION PROPOSED TO MANAGE STORMWATER)
POWER:
FRANKLIN PUD
NATURAL GAS:
CASCADE NATURAL GAS COMPANY
COMMUNICATION:
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS & CENTURY LINK
UTILITIES / SERVICES
AHBL, INC
5804 RD 90 SUITE H
PASCO, WA 99301
CONTACT: JOHN BECKER, PLS
PHONE: 509-380-5883
SURVEYOR:
NAD 1983
WASHINGTON STATE PLANE SOUTH PROJECTION, BASED
ON GPS OBSERVATIONS USING WSRN AND GEOID 2012A.
UNITS OF MEASUREMENT ARE US SURVEY FEET.
CITY OF PASCO VERTICAL BENCHMARK PSI 25-34
BRASS DISK AT WEST WERNETT ROAD AND ROAD 52.
ELEV = 381.42
VERTICAL DATUM
BASIS OF BEARING
AHBL, INC
5804 RD 90, SUITE H
PASCO, WA 99301
CONTACT: CALEB STROMSTAD, PE
PHONE: 509-380-5883
CIVIL ENGINEER:
BIG SKY DEVELOPERS
12406 EAGLE REACH COURT
PASCO, WA 99301
CONTACT: DAVID GREENO
APPLICANT:
PER OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
ORDER NO. BF4922 DATED JULY 7, 2017
A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 15,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, LYING SOUTHERLY OF
INTERSTATE FREEWAY 182 (I-182) DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE VILLAGES AT
CHAPEL HILL ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN
VOLUME D OF PLATS, PAGE 298, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON; THENCE NORTH 23°02'35” EAST, 270.00 FEET TO THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF I-182; THENCE ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF I-182, SOUTH 66°57'25” EAST,
2509.73 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 15; THENCE
LEAVING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF I-182 AND
FOLLOWING SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 00°30'24” WEST, 359.44 FEET TO
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE FRANKLIN COUNTY IRRIGATION
DISTRICT CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE
AND FOLLOWING THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID CANAL
RIGHT-OF-WAY, THE FOLLOWING COURSES: THENCE NORTH 72°42'53”
WEST 199.78 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A
286.48 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT (THE RADIUS
OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 17°17'07” EAST) THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 10°29'48” FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 52.48 FEET; THENCE
NORTH 62°13'05” WEST 176.62 FEET;
THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 71.62 FOOT RADIUS
TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT (THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH
27°46'55” WEST) THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°16'53” FOR AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 41.60 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY
LINE, NORTH 12°33'35” WEST, 20.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°57'25”
WEST, 128.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 55.00 FOOT RADIUS
NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT (THE RADIUS OF WHICH BEARS
NORTH 23°02'35” EAST) THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 116°08'13”
FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 111.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86°27'25”
WEST, 110.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66°57'25” WEST, 1185.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH
23°02'35” EAST, 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°57'25” WEST, 724.49
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 66°57'25” WEST, 81.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY
OF PASCO IN DEED RECORDED UNDER AUDITOR'S FILE NO. 1819180.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED LOT BOUNDARY
PROPOSED EASEMENT
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
LAND USE TABLE
SITE AREA:12.64 ACRES
TOTAL TWO-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL LOTS:86 LOTS
MINIMUM LOT AREAS:3,937 SF
MAXIMUM LOT AREAS:12,999 SF
AVERAGE LOT AREA:4,744 SF
TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY 3.27 ACRES
N
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 60 120
1" = 60 FEET
30
5804 Road 90, Suite H, Pasco, WA 99301
509.380.5883TEL 509.380.5883FAX www.ahbl.comWEB
TACOMA SEATTLE SPOKANE TRI-CITIES
Know what's below.
before you dig.Call
R
1
TCSKDMCTS
AUGUST 23, 2017
PRELIMINARY PLAT
2170169.10
12406 EAGLE REACH COURT
PASCO, WA 99301
BIG SKY DEVELOPERS
PREAKNESS RIDGE
A PORTION OF THE N 1/2 AND THE SE 1/4 OF SEC. 15, TWN. 09 N., RGE. 29 E. W.M.
CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
PREAKNESS RIDGE - PRELIMINARY PLAT
DATE: August 22, 2017 FILENAME: Q:\2017\2170169\10_CIV\CAD\2170169-PRELIMINARY PLAT.dwg
PRELIMINARY PLAT
C0.1
1RD 68ARGENT RD
SR
1
8
2
CHAPEL HILL BLVD
RD 60RD 57N
SITE
EXISTING CONTOUR
FOUND MONUMENT
SET NAIL AND WASHER
BOLLARD
SIGN
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
STORM CATCH BASIN
STORM MANHOLE
GAS METER
GAS VALVE
POWER TRANSFORMER
GUY ANCHOR
UTILITY POWER POLE
JUNCTION BOX
POWER METER
LUMINAIRE
TELEPHONE RISER
TELEPHONE VAULT
FIRE HYDRANT
IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
WATER METER
WATER VALVE
POWER VAULT
STORM LINE
SEWER LINE
WATER LINE
GAS LINE
ELECTRICAL LINE
COMMUNICATION LINE
OVERHEAD UTILITIES
FENCE
UNKNOWN VAULT
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
PROPOSED PLAT WILL BE DUPLEXES WITH ZERO (SHARED WALL) LOT LINES.
PROPOSED LAND USE
EXISTING EASEMENT
08/23/2017
Page 116 of 125
Looking NorthPage 117 of 125
Looking EastPage 118 of 125
Looking SouthPage 119 of 125
Looking SouthwestPage 120 of 125
Looking WestPage 121 of 125
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
9/21/2017
C. Preliminary Plat Preakness Ridge, 86-Lot Multi-Family (Big Sky
Developers LLC) (MF# PP 2017-008)
Chairwoman Roach read the master file number and asked for comments from staff.
Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the preliminary plat application for
Preakness Ridge, 86-lots of multi-family. In 2003, the Chapel Hill Development
received preliminary plat approval and that development was a mixed-use
development containing single-family homes, three sections for multi-family
development and some commercial development in between Chapel Hill Boulevard and
the freeway. It is a long narrow strip of land that is a little difficult to develop. The
City has received a request from a developer that has developed in Pasco in the past
and would like to develop this site with zero lot line duplex type of homes similar to
what is located on Sandifur Parkway at Road 76. They built duplexes with one unit
on each lot and the common wall was the property line and has been a successful
development. This developer would like to replicate that at this location. There are
other properties in the community similar and they have been listed in the staff report.
One of those is the townhomes behind Walmart on Road 76 and Mediterranean Villas
is another example. The other option the developer would have at this location is to
build multi-story larger buildings. In fact, last year the Building Department received
a permit application for a 220 unit apartment complex at this site. They paid their
plan review fee then backed out. This property is zoned for multi-family and is located
across the street that is also zoned for multi-family.
Commissioner Bowers asked about the area just west of this site zoned R-3.
Mr. McDonald responded that it is a park site and that there will be a 5 acre park
located there that was dedicated to the City a couple of years ago. The developer put
in the street, sidewalk and stubbed water and sewer.
Mr. McDonald added that the staff report didn’t include drawings so the drawings
were passed out to the Commissioner’s.
Chairwoman Roach stated that she remembers this item coming to the Planning
Commission a few years ago with the previous applicant applying for a rezone of this
property and the neighborhood input.
Mr. McDonald clarified that it wasn’t this property but the property across the street.
This property has been zoned since 2003.
Chairwoman Roach asked about the substation. She said it appears from the aerial
view there are arborvitaes along three sides and one side is open and asked if that side
didn’t have any arborvitaes due to driving access.
Page 122 of 125
Mr. McDonald said that is correct – it is the side the substation is accessed and in
that area to the west they have a number of vaults with equipment. The developer will
be putting a fence up on his side. The property lines go to the substation but there is
a large easement running north and south that they won’t be able to build on because
access is needed to the substation. They also have an easement for the substation
access along the southern portion of the plat coming off of the cul-de-sac and that
portion will not be able to be built on either.
Chairwoman Roach asked if the dashed line in their image was the access route for
the substation.
Mr. McDonald responded yes. The easement on the eastern edge is 40’ wide and there
are two easements on the south, one for access and one for electrical equipment.
Chairwoman Roach asked if there was any concern for this plat being so close to the
substation.
Mr. McDonald said no. The Columbia Place subdivision lies between Burns Road and
Sandifur Parkway and directly across the street from there is a substation. There is
another major substation at Road 92 near larger homes as well as one on Court Street
with homes across the street.
Chairwoman Roach added that it’s enforced in a way that discourages people to
trespass.
Mr. McDonald replied that it definitely is enforced with barbed wire fencing around it.
Commissioner Alvarado asked about frontage between Chapel Hill Boulevard and
“Road A”. He said he assumed that the duplexes would be facing the proposed “Road
A” and that there would be a fence on Chapel Hill.
Mr. McDonald responded that they will be fronting “Road A” but the developer hasn’t
decided yet if he will put a fence up. The fourplexes against the freeway just west of
where the park will be currently do not have any fencing or barriers.
Commissioner Alvarado said the developer may need to get creative because it could
look awkward to have homes on the other side and facing the back of a home without
a fence or the home just has a big fence in front of it.
Mr. McDonald said the fence my not be a problem, perhaps a little awkward with the
backs of the duplexes facing the homes but it doesn’t appear to be awkward or create
any problems with the fourplexes and there are homes directly across the street from
them.
Caleb Stromstad, 5804 Road 90, spoke as a representative for the applicant. He said
Page 123 of 125
the staff report was pretty straightforward and he had nothing to add unless the
Commission had questions.
Commissioner Alvarado asked what the developer was thinking of doing for the design.
Mr. Stromstad replied that they are still working on the grading concept. There are
some unique grading challenges at this site. As far as the backyards go, they do not
have a plan to fence but there will likely need to be a wall in some places on the
Chapel Hill side just to make the grades work. Overall, the developer really wants the
product to look good. The zero lot line homes have a higher resale value and will
make the neighborhood look attractive. He asked for clarification about the process
and if this item will come back to the Planning Commission next month.
Chairwoman Roach said yes. It will come back to the Planning Commission who will
then make a recommendation to City Council.
Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, clarified that this was the
public hearing and there will be no more hearings. The Commission will deliberate on
this item in the next month, make a recommendation in October and then it will go to
the first City Council meeting in November.
Mr. Stromstad said that with other cities the decision would be made and forwarded to
City Council in one meeting and didn’t know what the reason was behind having a
second meeting which delays the process. There were no citizens in the audience to
complain on the item.
Mr. McDonald responded that there is a process set up that requires a public hearing,
were testimony and information is submitted. Then in Pasco, the hearing in closed
and the Planning Commission comes back the following month to deliberate and
discuss it. That is the current process used.
With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed.
Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Mendez, to close the
public hearing on the proposed subdivision and initiate deliberations and schedule
adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for
the October 19, 2017 meeting. The motion passed unanimously.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
10/19/2017
B. Preliminary Plat Preakness Ridge, 86-Lot Multi-Family (Big Sky
Developers LLC) (MF# PP 2017-008)
Page 124 of 125
Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff.
Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the preliminary plat for Preakness Ridge, an
86-Lot multi-family development. He noted in Condition #7, the cul de sac at the east
end of Chapel Hill Boulevard must be squared to the southeast to provide additional
right-of-way access to the storm water pond to the south.
Chairman Cruz asked if the applicant was fine with the conditions.
Mr. McDonald replied, yes.
Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, to adopt findings
of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 19, 2017 staff report.
The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, based on findings
of fact and conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City
Council approve the preliminary plat for Preakness Ridge with conditions as listed in
the October 19, 2017 staff report. The motion passed unanimously.
Page 125 of 125