HomeMy WebLinkAbout1591 ResolutionATTES
7!"`"--W- lls, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 1591
A RESOLUTION adopting a revised and extended comprehensive
street program for the City of Pasco.
WHEREAS, R.C.W. 35.77.010 provides for annual revision
and extension of the Comprehensive Street Program of each city
and town, and after holding public hearings thereon; and
WHEREAS, it is now time to revise and extend that
Comprehensive Street Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on the
revision and extension of the City of Pasco Comprehensive Street
Program on
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
That the City Council of the City of Pasco hereby adopts
the revision and extension of the Comprehensive Program for the
ensuing six years as attached hereto and labeled "Six-Year
Construction Program, 1984-89", incorporated by this reference
as though fully set forth herein; and
That the Comprehensive Street Program shall be filed with
the Department of Transportation no later than
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this
18 day of July , 1983.
E A. Snider, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Adtba
Greg ibste11o, City Attorney
51A t AK IIANOP'OKIflILJN IMI -#KUYL.N11.14 rKt.JUKANI 84 su IV 89
OBLIGATION PROGRAM
Neartng Pate
Adoption Date
Reeo1ution Number
PROJECT COSTS IN THOU5AND5 OF DOLLARS
13 IA1 1 .z
Yeypunching Mote: Data entered in cols I - 8 frtli5f
3 G be on all cards punched from
ibis -Form.
City/County
City No.
County No.
• o
z
E
ti -
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION I MoJor Cloas of Work Work
C o d e
Total
Len9th 00: le o
-..
6 —
tie
§ t.
c e.
.0
\ 71
cc
3 OBLIGATION SCHEDULE ft FUNDING 500RCE
TOTAL
FUNDS
Tit ie, Route, Road Log No., Section No., t Y_ E A R FEDERAL
U.A.B. LOCAL Location/Term' nalDeecripilon of Work, g ,, I. et
.. (Annual
( Etement)
- 2 net 3 rd
Beginning Mdepoof 4 Bridge No. 4 , 5 4 Gth AMOUNT PROGRAM
Z -j3 1 115
-
343
2 zA,D,FIG
4
37 40
5
At 416
0,0,5,3
6
65A8
M
7
u
8 9
47)48 56
X i
4
i
8
i
10
52 _ 55
ILI a
11
SG 59
L.I
12.
CO 63
III•III.III.,,.
13
64 67
14
68 11
15
72 75
14 13 ;1 4
1G
76 '78
114 P
17
d0 845
i i 14,8 10 i 2,(), ,T,H, ,A,V,Et 'SLR, 11,2, 11.101 ,N,CIBIC,BIDIRIY
1 kliden to 62 feet,Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk,Channelization,
Grading, Drainage, Paving, Illunination
2
E„ I., E, W, I L S„ W, E, H, E, 1 T 1 0„ A,V, E, R, Y, , 1 i 1 _i_ 2 K A, Dif ,G 1%7.3 M_Ll I 5161 a 1 n 1 Iii II, 1 i 1 , ii . 5 A 4 1 .5 4 lit51610
Grading, Drainage, Widento 52 Feet Curb, Gutter, , Sidewalk, Iilumination
3
I • G I AVE A Ti Al SW' / ADFG 1 4 4 1 ,
Grading, Curb, Gutter, Pave at 52 Feet
Railroad Crossing, Illumination
4
1,n, ,T, H, ,Atv,F, ,A, IT, 0, ,c1L1A1R1K1 , .,,,, 3MF, G1H4I 101119 M. U , 31 81 0 , 1, ii, II, IL, 1,1 342 1,3 8 , i 13 18 JO
Widen to 62 Feet, Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Signal
Modernization
5
2ifi1Lal:LL_LAALEJ1S.a.L.1t2_1 faB.LC_LII1D_LiLY_L2_EAA_1ELG,_Ik5_1_I_ELLLIL_L4
Widen to 62 Feet, Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Channel-
ization , Grading Drainage, Paving, Illumination
L_8aLu_._i___i____L—L__L_i—L_±1--L-1—L----1---L--L----4 -a--13--L--1--JA--aA-_
6
IA. Y,S, iViAiRIIIOWISI iSiT,RIFIFIT,S, ,01v1F1R11 5D1 ., , ,34,0, 1LX 1 2,0,0 , 1. 510 111510 141510 1 1 i 1 1 1 I 1 1 9 15 0 1 1 19 15 41_,
Overlay various city streets which have existing
ACP
7
Fi iliFIWITIS1 IWIFIHIF1 ITIO1 ICiFiDIAIRI 1,111 2MA1D1F1G .0.47,1 ri II III III clic, 11 111 t i ili fl F1 At Ili silt 12,70_,,,1 ic 10
Grading, Drainage, Widen to 52 Feet, Curb, Gutter,
Sidewalk, Illumination
'8
OiR,F,G,O,N, 4AIVIE, lAt J.01 al liNISIWtOIRIT.H. L JKAID I F I G .0444
.
SJI jit 4 1 1 _i_kt At 910 , 1,21 0 FIAISP , , , Agn I 1 A 19,n
Grading, Curb, Gutter, Pave at 52 Feet,
'Railroad Crossing, Illumination
DASIRI BUT I ON
I COPY DISTRICT STATE AID E 4alt4 E ER
'
'I
AGENDA REPORT NO.
FOR: City Council
T0 Lee Kraft, City Manager WORKSHOP REGULAR
j s 4 • 1 Date17/11/83 1 Datel 7/#8/83
James Ajax, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM:
SUBJECT Six Ycar Street_ Construction Program (1984-1989)
r .
REFERENCE(S): (List only those attached)
A Vicinity Map
B Proposed Construction Program
C Detailed Outline of Revenue Picture by Source
[I. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATION,
A) WORKSHOP - DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION
B) REGULAR MEETING- (1) Conduct Public Hearing
(2) MOTION: I move to adopt Resolution No. , establishing the Six
Year Street Construction Program for calendar years 1984
through 1989.
N. I ISCAI IMPACT (Capital Outlay and M.O.)
N/A
V. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF, Each year all citys are required to submit a Six
Year Street Construction Program The proposed projects in terms of cost
must reasonably equal anticipated revenue The revenue picture for the
coming year looks considerably brighter than thepast few years due to the
accumulation of money in the city's overlay fund, increase in gas tax
funding, funding of the Urban Arterial Program, and the continuation of
Federal Highway Funding Programs
DISCUSSIU\T It is staff's belief that there are four major projects that
are really overdue, those improvements being
1) 20th Avenue (Bypass to Airport) estimated cost
$480,000
2) East Lewis (Wehe to Avery) estimated cost
560,000
3) Oregon Avenue Extension ("A" to Ainsworth) estimated cost
475,000
4) 10th Avenue ("A" to Clark) estimated cost
380,000
Each of these projects are eligible for Urban Arterial Board funding
consideration and if we are reasonably fortunate, at least one of these
projects will be funded
The most important item in terms of timing is 20th Avenue as with the stat
going ahead with widening 20th Avenue in the area of the interchange and
thus, it is imperative that our improvement occur in 1984.
I. OTHER COMMENTS
II. ADMINISTRATIVE ROUTING
6 (a
DATE- July 8, 1983
C r•
S —
t
4t _C=1
—4 21
s+D
-J
slq
C====
c
Lhirrirg
FL
PASCO WASPI INOTON
Ccoleavrati, drooktpment Deport...no
STWEE V Pli. AX
—
ICASO3 1/40N1
date, 2 19 196a tUt74:ATID 1• Pa
PROJECT C05T5 IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 19 84 TO 19 89
- OBLIGATION PROGRAM
Keypunching Note'Dataentenndin cols1-8nnust
3-4 be on all cards punched from
iht5 -form.
1 -2
City/County
City No.
Count9 hlo•
31115111
LIM
Hearing Date
Adoption Date
Resolution Number
• 0
z
E
p-.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION 1Mcwor Cloos I of Work Work
Code
Total
Length N ile .)
--/
75,
fl t
c
u? I Runt Vtlrba r 1
b
4 ,, t,,,
0
OBLIGATION SCHEDULE FUNDING SOURCE
TOTAL
FUNDS
Title, Route, Road Log No., Section No., YEAR FEDERAL
U A.B. LOCAL LocatiWiermtni l Descripilon of Work,
Beginning Milepost # brid9e No. 15t
(Annual
Element)
- Z nd 3rd 4,5
it 6 th AMOUNT PROGRAM
2 S )314 4
37 40,41
5
4 4
0
45
7
4 6 /
8
47
9
40 SI
10
52 35
II
Sa 39
12 13
co 63/64 61 068
14
"II
15
VI '75
16
76 79
17
SO SS
9
T, R, A, F, F1 II C, .S1 1 1 G 1 N, AI L, , 1 1 M 1 P, R, 0, V, E t M, Eitsl i T I S wit,. ,,, In( ,8,5„.i% 5 . , 81 5 12 55. A5 19 SF IA iS IP I 1 1 • 1 5 1 1 i . 15 i i 0
Lewis street at 28th, 10th, 7th, & Oregon Ave. loth
Ave at A Str. & Clark Str. Sylvester Str. at 20th
Ave. Court Str. at 4th. Ave & Rd. 36 or Rd. 34
I.,,,L.,..illiiLliiiii 4 ,,I Kt,. Ili ill iii III 'It III 11. 1,1 II, till,
a
F i AI St Ti O LF,. Ti 1-',_,-; L.', V ci Li I, a 1111i _ __,-,, 4nk 134 OL F , . 1 7 A U 7 I 5 r0 I , 1 Iii 11 II • III iii 111 n 15-1 °
Grading, Drainage, Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk, Pave,
Illunination
,
II,ItItii,atialiiii,alik.,1 . MA I 1 1 1 4 1 I I I III Ill I 11 It I II II I I I I 11111
DiSTRIBUTION
coPy DISTRICT STATE AID ENIaltslrER
150 150
• ANTICIPATED/ PROJECTED REVENUE FOR
STREET PROJECTS (IN 1,000s OF DOLLARS)
UNOBLIGATEE
CASH
FORWARD
END
1983
1988 1989
SOURCE
STATE 112-CENT
GAS TAX
TOTALS t-
- NOT INCLUDED IN TOTALS
•. ,
11111 11J1 ;al "r ,1 1:111'1.
CITY UTILITY TAX
0 TO 1,000
135 135
REVENUE PICTURE
It would seem appropriate to outline what the staff would estimate
to be reasonably anticipated revenues. That way, you as Council
members will have a better understanding of the various funding
sources and the constraints and rules relating to these funding
sources. It should be pointed out that going into 198t ,, not
only is the city's street fund in better shape than it has been
for the last few years, but also both the State and Federal funding
sources have significantly improved due to the increase in thc gas
tax at each of those two levels.
CITY FUNDS: The sole source of city funds for street improvement
is the 1% utility tax designated for overlaying streets pre‘lously
improved to a higher standard and specifically asphaltic concrete
streets. It is anticipated that that fund will have a 1983 year
end cash balance of approximately $150,000 and it is anticiplted
that the city will receive approximately $150,000 for each of the
next six years It should however be noted that this figure
could change downward depending on the P.U.D.'s actions relating
to rates and the IPPPSS debt payments.
,STATE FUNDS (One-Half Cent Gas Tax Fund): The 1983 budget
anticipated receiving $91,800 or $4.82 per capita in 1983
The state, in light of the increase in gas tax rate projects ) $5.50 per capita and a total of almost $105,000. Without a
'population increase, that figure again due to the tax increase
should result in $6.60 per capita in 1984 and a total of $125,000
and $7.20 per capita in 1985 and subsequent years and a total of
$135,000 per year. There are essentially no strings attached to
this money and it can be used on any street in town provided that
1 the finished improvement provides a project that complies with
state standards. The money can also be used to match most other
o , , grant sources that do not provide 100% funding.
URBAN ARTERIAL BOARD (UAB): The 1983 legislature through the
increase in the gas tax, provided the authority to issue
one million dollars (DI: bone: funding to the Urban Arterial Board
' This is a 90% grant funding program and projects that the city
of Pasco submits, must compete with other jurisdictions in our
region which includes Yakima, Walla Walla, Kennewick and Richland.
The Urban Arterial Board has been without funds for several years
and its refunding is very encouraging. Although unknown at this
time, it is most probable that on the order of 3.5 million dollars
will be allocated to projects in our region at the October 1983
3oard meeting.
i
Eligible projects are restricted to arterial routes (staff will
provide a map at meeting indicating routes) and it is important
that the city consider how the state prioritizes projects to
insure that we submit our best projects from a competative
standpoint. Their priority rating considers total traffic,
traffic accidents, conjestion, and structural condition as the
four most significant factors.
,FEDERAL FUNDS (Federal Aid Urban Systems (FAUS) Program -
Sometimes referred to as FAM): Federal legislation in 1983
provided for the continuation of the FAUS funding program which
4otherwise would have terminated at the end of the first quarter
Aof Federal fiscal year 1983. These Federal grant funds are
distributed to the states who in turn make allocations to citys
within the state. This a 83% grant funding program. The City
of Pasco with the proposed 4th Avenue improvement project has
or is in the process of committing its allocation through 1985
In the following four years, we are advised that the city will
receive about $80,000 per year.
1 FEDERAL AID SAFETY PROGRAM (FASP): These are Federal funds that
" are periodically distributed to the states and in turn the State
I' of Washington allows the citys to submit grant applications which
compete with the submissions of other cities on a priority bac,is.
These funds vary from 100% grant to as low as 50% grant.
" Examples of projects that the city has received would be traffic
signals, permanent pavement markings and railroad xing projects.
, It is a total unknown as to how much money will be available
It is anticipated that the foregoing was rather lenghty, however,
i it is information that should be made available to the city's
policy body.
ar, 0,1r
eftly'''A 1„11 3 /10--
;