Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017.07.10 Council Workshop PacketWorkshop Meeting AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. July 10, 2017 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 3 (a) Presentation of Recycling Considerations Presented by Darrick Dietrich, President, Basin Disposal, Inc. (BDI) (b) Presentation on Lean Processes Applied to Equipment Rental and Replacement Program Presented by Curt Shaw, Public Works Division Manager 4 - 8 (c) CDBG Substantial Amendment 2016.1 (MF#BGAP2017-006) 9 - 12 (d) Final Acceptance: 2016 Annual Sewer Re-Lining Project 13 - 15 (e) Final Acceptance: Midland Lane Extension Project (South of Sandifur Parkway) 16 - 19 (f) Final Acceptance: Road 38 Stormwater Retrofit 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 7. ADJOURNMENT. REMINDERS: 1. 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, July 11, TRAC Facility – TRAC Advisory Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER CHI FLORES and COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY) Page 1 of 19 Workshop Meeting July 10, 2017 2. 7:00 a.m., Thursday, July 13 – BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.) 3. 3:30 p.m., Thursday, July 13, FCEM Office – Franklin County Emergency Management Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN, Alt.) 4. 7:00 p.m., Thursday, July 13, Transit Facility – Ben-Franklin Transit Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER CHI FLORES, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC-TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 2 of 19 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 7, 2017 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 7/10/17 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager Executive SUBJECT: Presentation of Recycling Considerations I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Presented by Darrick Dietrich, President, Basin Disposal, Inc. (BDI) III. FISCAL IMPACT: Depends on Alternatives IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Council has considered the costs and benefits of curbside recycling on a number of occasions over the past several years. In 2009, and again in 2015, a question regarding recycling was included among the three policy questions included in the National Citizens Survey. In both cases, the survey results indicated support for curbside recycling with 2009 combined ‘strong’ or ‘somewhat’ totaling 63% (at a projected $4 - 5/mo.) and 2015 results indicating 66% combined support ($4.50-5.50/mo.) Green waste interest was also polled in 2015 with a 55% combined support result. The City renewed its solid waste collection agreement with BDI in November 2015. The agreement provides that, upon the City’s request, the contractor will provide a written proposal including the service rates, proposed routes and schedules, as well as qualifying materials, plus an estimate of the interval necessary to secure the necessary equipment and facilities needed to implement such service. Mr. Dietrich will discuss the factors that Council should consider, including alternative participation/cost scenarios, if it intends to request a proposal from BDI leading to possible implementation of recycling services.. V. DISCUSSION: Page 3 of 19 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 5, 2017 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development Workshop Meeting: 7/10/17 FROM: Angie Pitman, Urban Development Coordinator Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: CDBG Substantial Amendment 2016.1 (MF# BGAP2017-006) I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Resolution - Based on Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 6/15/17 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Council passed Resolution Nos. 3578, 3658, and 3731 approving the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) budget for program years 2015-2017. The resolutions approved unfunded and partially funded eligible projects such as Pasco Specialty Kitchen facility improvements, downtown revitalization, safety and sidewalk improvements, as contingencies. Close-out of prior year projects in 2014, 2015, and 2016 and a change in priority needs for 2016 and 2017 infrastructure projects results in unobligated funds totaling $133,367 for reprogramming. Program income from payoff of prior year CDBG rehabilitation loans totaling $40,100 must be allocated and used. A “minor amendment” to the approved plan occurs when a revision is made to the priority needs, in the method of distribution of funds, when an activity not previously Page 4 of 19 identified in the plan is added, or when the purpose, scope, location or beneficiaries of an activity are changed. It requires only City Manager review and approval. A “substantial amendment” to the plan occurs when the original purpose of the project is changed to a new eligible category, or when a change in the allocation exceeds 10 percent of the individual City’s current year’s CDBG allocation, including program income. It requires the same level of review and approval as the Annual Work Plan and Allocations. V. DISCUSSION: Staff presented recommendations for funding at the June 15, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of funding recommendations as presented. There are some minor adjustments to the Planning Commission funding recommendation to balance with the HUD Integrated Disbursement and Reporting System (IDIS), and to account for the 2017 entitlement allocation which was unknown when the Planning Commission staff report was prepared. The proposed resolution attached includes projects meeting both "minor amendment" and "substantial amendment" criteria for the record. If Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission as adjusted, the proposed resolution will be returned for Council action. Page 5 of 19 RESOLUTION NO. _________ A RESOLUTION amending the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Allocations and Annual Work Plans for Program Years 2016 and 2017. WHEREAS, changes in priority needs resulted in cancellation of the Downtown Revitalization Safety and 1st and Sylvester Sidewalk Improvements projects; and WHEREAS, unobligated funds may be reprogrammed to fund or increase funding as need for owner occupied rehabilitations, and Pasco Commercial Kitchen and Peanuts Park Renovation public facility projects; Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: Section 1. That the Pasco City Council hereby approves amendments to the Annual Work Plans as follows: 2014 Activities Amended Revised Budget 325 Catholic Family Charities Wheelchair Ramps $5,000 $8,159 326 CHIP Minor Rehabilitation Program*$15,000 $55,000 *Plus future program income from payoff of CDBG rehab loans 2015 Activities Amended Revised Budget 347 Commercial Kitchen Façade Improvement (Moved to 356)($25,031)$0 2016 Activities Amended Revised Budget 355 Commercial Kitchen Facility Improvements (Contingency)$50,000 $122,000 356 Commercial Kitchen Façade Improvement (Contingency)$75,031 $95,467 359 Downtown Revitalization Safety Improvements (Cancelled)($105,000)$0 2017 Activities – Pending approval Amended Revised Budget 367 Peanuts Park Renovation $191,145 $476,145 368 1st and Sylvester Sidewalks and Ramps (Cancelled)($100,000)$0 Section 2. That the Pasco City Council hereby approves eligible activities from program years 2017 and prior Annual Work Plan and Allocations which were not funded, partially funded, or underfunded as contingencies for reprogrammed or excess funds; and Section 3. That the City Manager or his delegate is authorized to sign all agreements in accordance with the 5-Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan Supplements as approved by Council. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this _____day of _______________, 2017 _____________________________ Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: _____________________________ ___________________________ Daniela Erickson Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney Page 6 of 19 PLANNING COMMISISON MINUTES June 15, 2017 A. Block Grant Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Substantial Amendment to Annual Action Plan 2016 and 2017 (MF# BGAP 2017-006) Chairwoman Bykonen read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the CDBG Substantial Amendment to the 2016 & 2017 Annual Action Plan. With the amount of money the City receives from HUD, roughly $650,000-$675,000 per year, there are sometimes activities that come in under budget or the project gets cancelled over the course of the year to affect the budget item that the Planning Commission recommended and that City Council approved. In this case, the City has exceeded the 10% of its yearly allocation in terms of “changed funds for projects” which is why it has come back to the Planning Commission and will then go to City Council. Roughly $275,000 has been cancelled in projects and with program income of almost $78,500 there is nearly $354,000 to reallocate. The staff memo includes the breakdown of where the available money is recommended to be funded. Some of the funds will go to the Catholic Families Volunteer Chore Services who help build handicap ramps at the homes of low-moderate elderly families. Other funds will be allocated to help with home rehabilitations, which was previously awarded to Community Action Connections (CAC) who have not used the funds. However, the City has taken this project back as there are projects that the funds could be used for. There is also an item for new community housing programs – Rebuilding Mid-Columbia. This organization applied for CDBG funds for the 2017 program year but at that time they had not received their 501(c)(3). They now have their 501(c)(3) and will be partnering with the City to complete housing projects. This will give their organization the experience and training while helping the City complete these projects but the money will be funneled through the City while they will be bringing in the projects. It will be much like a mentoring relationship and will assist the City. Staff is also recommending additional funds be allocated to the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, partially by reallocating the Commission recommended to the façade – more money was spent on the flooring project and the façade project will still be facilitated. The Downtown Façade Improvement Program received funding as we are at a point now where some projects can be accomplished. Money is also being spent now on the Peanuts Park project located downtown and staff is recommending more funds to be allocated to that project as well. So public money is being reinvested downtown and hopefully that will spur private investments downtown. The first phase will be the renovation of Peanuts Park and Farmer’s Market. The second phase will be at the intersection of 4th Avenue and Lewis Street, setting up for the third phase, which is a festival street on 4th Avenue west of the Farmer’s Market to be used for festival space. A couple of projects were closed/cancelled. The sidewalk in front of the Senior Center was cancelled, as the money for that came from the funds from the Police Department Building and the Downtown Sidewalks project was closed because those improvements will happen when the Lewis Street Underpass project is under Page 7 of 19 construction in roughly 2019. Commissioner Bowers said when these projects were first brought to the Planning Commission, Angie Pitman, Block Grant Administrator, had recommendations for the allocations. Now since there is an adjustments in funds, what is before the Commission at this time are the recommendations for reallocations. Mr. White stated that was correct. Commissioner Bowers asked about programs, such as the Martin Luther King Center staff funds, and why those projects didn’t receive additional reallocated funds. Mr. White responded that those are annual funds and didn’t need additional monies. Commissioner Greenaway stated that she was happy to see that the City was partnering with Rebuilding Mid-Columbia to repair homes. Mr. White responded that it is a really good thing because there aren’t enough community housing based programs. It also assists with funds with the HOME program. Commissioner Campos added that many federal grant programs requires organizations to have so much experience in order to receive funds so this would allow for Rebuilding Mid-Columbia to gain the experience they need to be able to apply for additional federal funds. Commissioner Alvarado asked what the scope was for Rebuilding Mid-Columbia and what did they intend to grow into. Mr. White stated that they are a community housing based improvement program and they most likely want to become a lot like Habitat for Humanity, which is the only other community housing base administrator in the area. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to close the public hearing and recommend the City Council approve the use of funds for the Community Development Block Grant Program as set forth in the “2016.1 Fund Summary” as recommended by Staff. The motion passed unanimously. Page 8 of 19 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 3, 2017 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick Terway, Interim Public Works Director Workshop Meeting: 7/10/17 FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Final Acceptance: 2016 Annual Sewer Re-Lining Project I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Final Engineer's Report II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: $253,750 - Utility Fund (Sewer) IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: This project rehabilitated 5,578 linear feet of 8-inch through 15-inch diameter sanitary sewer pipe using heat or ultraviolet light Cured-In-Place Pipe (CIPP) in the area south of I-182 east from 9th Avenue and west from 4th Avenue. This project is part of the budgeted annual sewer relining program that addresses the higher priority relining for the sanitary sewer lines. Gravity sanitary sewer lines, subject to rehabilitation, are concrete pipelines with signs of deterioration. The proposed relining allows the existing system to operate without leaks, as well as improve the City's capability to clean and inspect these lines, maintaining the integrity of the City's sewer collections system and extending its service life. On November 17, 2016 the City received four (4) bids for the project. The lowest bid was from Planned & Engineered Construction, Inc. in the amount of $252,495.00. The Engineer's Estimate was $249,435.74 which didn't include contingencies taken into Page 9 of 19 consideration for total project budget approved by Council. On December 5, 2016 Council awarded the contract to Planned and Engineered Construction, Inc. of Helena, Montana. V. DISCUSSION: The project was successfully completed within the allotted contract time and the work meets project specifications. Total budget for the project was $300,000 with final project costs including, engineering & inspection, totaling $277,235.22. There was minimal construction cost increase due to an increase in lining quantity for larger diameter pipe over the estimated quantities in the original contract. Staff recommends Council's acceptance of this work. Page 10 of 19 Page 11 of 19  Page 1                Memo                     Public Works Department To: File Engineering Division From: David Tanner, Civil Engineer Date: 07/03/2017 Re: 2016 Annual Sewer Re-Lining – Final Engineer’s Report Bid Item Changes in Quantity  Bid Item 4, Pre-Installation Cleaning and Inspection – Final quantity for this bid item was based on actual quantities as measured in the field. Actual measured quantity for this bid item was 5578 LF, while the estimated quantity was 5639 LF for a total savings of $122.00.  Bid Item 6, Furnish and Install 8-in Diam. CIPP – Final quantity for this bid item was based on actual quantities installed, as measured in the field. Actual measured quantity for this bid item was 3963 LF, while the estimated quantity was 4157 LF for a total savings of $5,432.00.  Bid Item 7, Furnish and Install 10-in Diam. CIPP – Final quantity for this bid item was based on actual quantities installed, as measured in the field. Actual measured quantity for this bid item was 297 LF, while the estimated quantity was 295 LF for a total increased cost of $60.00.  Bid Item 9, Furnish and Install 15-in Diam. CIPP – Final quantity for this bid item was based on actual quantities installed, as measured in the field. Actual measured quantity for this bid item was 795 LF, while the estimated quantity was 664 LF for a total increased cost of $6,550.00.  Bid Item 10, Internal Reinstatement of Side Sewer – Final quantity for this bid item was based on actual quantities installed, as measured in the field. Actual measured quantity for this bid item was 96 EA, while the estimated quantity was 94 EA for a total increased cost of $100.00. Page 12 of 19 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 29, 2017 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick Terway, Interim Public Works Director Workshop Meeting: 7/10/17 FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Final Acceptance: Midland Lane Extension Project (South of Sandifur Parkway) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Private Contribution - $35,000 Traffic Impact Fees Fund - $59,271 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) Fund - $419,620 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: As a result of an economic development opportunity, the Midland Lane Extension project, South of Sandifur Parkway, surfaced late in 2015. The project afforded the opportunity to bundle with it a planned traffic signal project at Midland Lane and Sandifur Parkway that addresses current conditions and allows for an economy of scale savings. On July 5, 2016, Council approved the addition of the project to the 2016 Capital Improvement Plan. The project included construction of a new south leg of the Sandifur Parkway and Midland Lane intersection, which ends in a cul-de-sac. The project also added a new traffic signal and accessible pedestrian signals at the intersection. Other work associated with the extension of the street included extension of utilities, addition of catch basins with infiltration trenches for stormwater runoff, addition of street lighting, upgrading all ADA curb ramps at the intersection to meet current requirements, and the addition of sidewalk. Page 13 of 19 The project was advertised and bid in September of 2016 with the lowest bidder being Premier Excavation Inc., with the total bid amount of $412,297.58. On October 3, 2016, Council awarded this project to Premier Excavation Inc. V. DISCUSSION: The project was successfully completed within the allotted contract time and the work meets project specifications. The final project construction contract totaled $408,207.20. This final cost came just under the bid amount, showing great efficiency during construction. Originally estimated to cost approximately $670,000, the final total project cost totaled being $495,000, which included; design, construction, construction inspection, material testing, and project management. Staff recommends Council's acceptance of this work. Page 14 of 19 J I /Q I '0: \/géy / \\_\_”/g,:0:;// /(KR / \ \,\\\ ‘~~\/\\~\__4s Y_4 __T“‘?_—@_+g——————_____——.o~;-——.¢¢=——9;- J WDIAND IIAVIEIECTENSION(SOIIIIH OF SANDINJR Located in the City of Pasco,Franklin County,Washington,within portion of the W ‘/2of Section 8,Township 9 North,Range 29 East,Willamette lMeridian }_msco‘""""I|||IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIWREVISION(509)545-3444PUBLICWORKS—ENGINEERING O 0 :1: <1 D-4 Ln. O > 9 l—4 U BROADMOOR PROJECT LOCATION NEW MIDLAND LANE EXTENSION VICINITYMAPFOFICITYCOUNCILMIDLANDLANEEXTENSION CAD DWG:EASEMAP PROJ.NO.CP5ST4A1521 DATE:02—10~—‘l6 DRAWNBY:AA DESIGN BY:AA CHECKED BY:JS KM HOR SCALE:N/A NOT TO SCAL"“WM NIIIIII P a g e 1 5 o f 1 9 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council June 29, 2017 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick Terway, Interim Public Works Director Workshop Meeting: 7/10/17 FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Final Acceptance: Road 38 Stormwater Retrofit I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Final Engineer's Report II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: $53,737.80 - Utility Fund (Storm) IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In early 2016, City Staff recognized a stormwater issue located in the vicinity of Road 38 and Court Street. The configuration of street improvements on Court Street caused a significant amount of stormwater to be channeled by the curb and gutter and conveyed to properties located on Road 38. Due to the potential for damaging the abutting properties, City Staff determined that it was necessary to install improvements to capture and infiltrate the stormwater generated by this two block stretch of Court Street. This project installed two new catch basins on Road 38 and one new catch basin on Court Street to alleviate an existing stormwater issue. All stormwater collected in the catch basins will be routed to a newly installed infiltration trench in Road 38. On November 17, 2016, the City received four (4) bids for the project. The low bid was from C&E Trenching, LLC, in the amount of $51,201.53. The second lowest bid was Page 16 of 19 received from Moreno & Nelson Construction in the amount of $82,693.47. The Engineer's Estimate was $72,300.45. On November 28, 2016 the project was awarded to C&E Trenching, LLC for $51,201.53 V. DISCUSSION: The project was successfully completed within the allotted contract time and the work meets project specifications. The final project construction contract totaled $53,737.80, representing a 4.95% increase over the original bid price. The minimal cost increases were due to additional pavement, sidewalk, and curbing restoration beyond the estimated quantities in the original contract. Staff recommends Council's acceptance of this work. Page 17 of 19 Page 18 of 19  Page 1                Memo                     Public Works Department To: File Engineering Division From: David Tanner, Civil Engineer Date: 06/29/2017 Re: Road 38 Stormwater Retrofit – Final Engineer’s Report Bid Item Changes in Quantity  Bid Item 13, HMA Cl 1/2" PG 645-28 (2-1/2") – Final quantity for this bid item was based on actual quantities installed, as measured in the field. Actual measured quantity for this bid item was 434.8 SY, while the estimated quantity was 370 SY for a total additional cost of $1,283.04.  Bid Item 14, Cement Concrete Sidewalk– Final quantity for this bid item was based on actual quantities installed, as measured in the field. Actual measured quantity for this bid item was 29 SY, while the estimated quantity was 5 SY for a total additional cost of $3,658.32.  Bid Item 17, Cement Conc. Traffic Curb and Gutter– Final quantity for this bid item was based on actual quantities installed, as measured in the field. Actual measured quantity for this bid item was 37.5 LF, while the estimated quantity was 30 LF for a total additional cost of $437.63. Page 19 of 19