Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017.04.10 Council Special Meeting PacketSpecial Meeting AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. April 10, 2017 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. PUBLIC HEARING: 2 - 15 (a) Mobilitie Franchise Application CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING 4. ADJOURNMENT. Page 1 of 15 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 7, 2017 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Special Meeting: 4/10/17 FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Mobilitie Franchise Application I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Typical Street Cross Section 2. DKS Associates Memorandum dated March 21, 2017 3. Mobilitie Proposed Locations 4. Street Pole Comparison II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) Mobilitie, LLC, is a telecommunications infrastructure company with headquarters in Newport Beach, CA. Mobilitie has presented the City with a franchise application, intending to locate its facilities in the City’s public right-of-way. The initial application presents 5 locations within the City’s public right-of-way, where utility poles as tall as 63 feet are proposed. B) Washington State statute RCW 35A.47.040 grants the authority to every code city to “permit and regulate under such restrictions and conditions as it may set by charter or ordinance and to grant nonexclusive franchises for the use of public streets, bridges or other public ways structures or places above or below the surface of the ground for railroads and other routes and facilities for public conveyances, for poles, conduits, tunnels, towers and structures, pipes and wires and appurtenances thereof for transmission and distribution of electrical energy, signals and other methods of communication…and other private and publicly owned and op erated facilities for Page 2 of 15 public service. The power hereby granted shall be in addition to the franchise authority granted by general law to cities.” Further, RCW 35A.12.120 states that “(t)he passage of any ordinance, grant or revocation of franchise or license…shall require the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the whole membership of the council.” Washington state law makes it clear that the power to approve or deny applications for franchises within the public right-of-way rests with the legislative body of a city. C) Pasco Municipal Code 15.10.010 provides the City of Pasco City Council’s findings and purpose regarding telecommunications facilities and the City’s rights-of-way. PMC 15.10.010(C) states that the City’s public rights-of-way are a “unique and physically limited resource” requiring “proper management by the City” in order to maximize the efficiency and minimize the costs to the taxpayers of the foregoing uses, protect against foreclosure of future economic expansion because of premature exhaustion of the public rights-of-way as an economic resource, and to minimize negative effects upon the public from such facilities’ construction, emplacement, relocation, and maintenance in the rights-of-way.” PMC 15.10.010(C) further enumerates the City’s intent to “(c)onserve the limited physical capacity of the public ways held in public trust by the City” and “(a)ssure that the City can continue to fairly and responsibly protect the public health, safety and welfare.” D) Pasco Municipal Code 15.10.050(B) sets forth the requirements for an application for franchise within the City’s rights-of-way, stating that “(w)ithin 120 days after receiving a complete application under Pasco Municipal Code Section 15.10.040 for Franchise, the City shall issue a written determination granting or denying the application in whole or in part. Prior to granting or denying a Franchise, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing and make a decision based upon the standards set forth in Pasco Municipal Code Section 15.10.050(A).” Per this section, the City Council is the entity with the authority to grant or deny a franchise application, and such determination shall be based upon the eleven enumerated standards set forth in the code. E) Under Section 15.10.050(A), prior to granting or denying a franchise, the City Council must conduct a public hearing and thereafter issue a written determination based on several specific standards. (To minimize repetition of material, the specific standards are not listed here, but are included in the discussion section below). F) In accordance with RCW 35A.47.040, Council must approve a franchise at a regular meeting and can do so no sooner than five (5) days after its introduction for discussion and initial presentation before Council. Per PMC 15.10.050(B), a written determination is required for denial of any franchise application. V. DISCUSSION: City staff suggests that the Council review the following considerations regarding the standards in PMC 15.10.050(A) in making the pertinent determination: Page 3 of 15 1. Whether the applicant has received all requisite licenses, certificates, and authorizations from the Federal Communications Commission, the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, and any other federal or state agency with jurisdiction over the activities proposed by the applicant; (Comments) The City is not currently able to confirm whether the applicant has received all licenses, certificates, and authorizations from the above agencies or any other agency that may have jurisdiction over its proposed activities. However, it is suggested that, in the event the Council chooses to grant a franchise, such grant be conditioned upon the applicant’s providing evidence of all applicable authorizations. 2. The capacity of the public ways to accommodate the applicant's proposed facilities; (Comments) Potentially, at some locations, there is space to accommodate the proposed facilities, but that space is limited and, in some cases, already occupied by existing infrastructure in much of the City. In some cases, the proposed facilities would occupy most, if not all, of the available right-of-way. In some instances, the remaining right-of-way outside of curb, gutter, and sidewalk may be as little as 5.5 feet. The applicant’s current proposed structures include several steel poles that are 63 feet high. They have a 23-inch diameter at the base with a foundation of 35 inches in diameter and 13.5 feet below the ground. This does not take into account the utility pole grounding rods which in their installed placement extend approximately 12 feet from the centerline of the pole foundation. (See attachment 1.) 3. The capacity of the public ways to accommodate additional utility, cable, open video, and telecommunications facilities if the franchise is granted; (Comments) Due to the proposed pole foundation being 35 inches in diameter, not including the grounding rod configuration, there will be very limited room for additional utilities traditionally located within the right-of-way for other traditional franchisees and utility providers delivering services associated with the safety, health and welfare of the community at-large at the proposed locations of the facilities of the applicant. 4. The damage or disruption, if any, of public or private facilities, improvements, service, travel or landscaping if the franchise is granted; (Comments) The installation of the proposed facilities would most certainly cause damage, or at a minimum, disruption of the surrounding public and/or private facilities, but would be monitored and restoration would be required, as with any franchisee working within the City of Pasco right-of-way. 5. The public interest in minimizing the cost and disruption of construction within the public ways; Page 4 of 15 (Comments) The public does have an inherent interest in the minimization of the costs and disruptions associated with right-of-way construction. 6. The service that applicant will provide to the community and region; (Comments) It is unclear, and possibly difficult to measure what service, if any, that the applicant, as a cellular service provider, will provide to the residents of the City of Pasco. It is also important to note that the existing franchisees offer services to all the residents of Pasco, such as power, telephone, cable TV, natural gas, etc. 7. The effect, if any, on public health, safety and welfare if the franchise is granted; (Comments) Consideration should be given to the inherent risks of placing a large, 63 foot x 23-inch, solid, immovable object within the roadway corridor. Traffic safety recommends a “clear zone” area to be considered when designing roadways (see Attachment 2 - Memorandum from DKS Associates). The preferred approach is to go with crash considerate items, such as breakaway signposts, in-road rights-of-way. Additionally, PMC 26.32.100 (see below) requires that utilities, such as power, that was previously located overhead, be placed underground. This is mostly from a safety consideration as above-ground utility poles are immovable and represent a considerable safety concern. 26.32.100 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. (1) All utility lines serving the subdivision, including but not limited to power, telephone and television cables shall be installed underground. Adequate easements shall be provided for all such utility lines, which will not be located within the right -of -way. 8. The availability of alternate routes and/or locations for the proposed facilities; (Comments) Historically, these types of telecommunications structures have been placed on private parcels for a fee to the property owner. Private parcels remain abundantly available for the placement of large telecommunication structures within the City of Pasco. 9. Applicable federal and state communications laws, regulations and policies; (Comments) The City is not currently aware of applicable federal and state communications laws, regulations and policies that pertain to the decision regarding this application except as noted herein. 10. Such other factors as may demonstrate that the grant to use the public ways will serve the community interest; (Comments) It does not appear that there are other factors which demonstrate that a Page 5 of 15 community interest is served by granting the use of the City’s rights -of-way. Presently, the utilities facilities located in the City’s rights -of-way provide services which are utilized by citizens residing along such rights-of-way, and locating utilities such as sewer, water, and gas lines, among others, in the right-of-way is necessary for the adjacent properties to gain direct access to said utility service. The nexus of service and location is not clearly demonstrated by the current application. 11. Such other and further factors as may be deemed appropriate by the City. (Comments) It is important to consider the potential costs to other private development should a pole need to be relocated for improvements to the frontage of said parcel(s) including roadway widening, construction of curb and gutter, sidewalk and/or underground utilities. PROPOSED LOCATION SUMMARY The applicant is currently proposing to locate utility poles at five (5) locations throughout the City as follows (See Attachment 3): 1. 14th Avenue and West Henry - Wood Pole - Total Height 28’ 2. 6605 Burden Boulevard - Wood Pole - Total Height 37’ 3. 7421 Sandifur Parkway - Steel Pole - Total Height 63’ 4. 17th Avenue and West Sylvester Street - Steel Pole - Total Height 63’ 5. Madison Avenue and Hartford Drive - Steel Pole - Total Height 63’ Staff notes that while the proposed wood poles are comparable in height and size as typically found in existing utility poles, most particularly in the older parts of the community which were installed prior to undergrounding requirements, the proposed steel structures are of such a scale as to provide an imposing view and safety consideration on the traveling public (See Attachment 4). Staff would further note that the City, in partnership with Franklin County PUD, expends in excess of $100,000 annually to underground power distributions systems in large part to eliminate the hazard(s) presented by the existence of even wood utility poles within the public road right-of-way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Although there is public right-of-way capacity that could be utilized by the applicant, it is the City staff’s recommendation that the application for franchise be rejected on the grounds that the service provided does not specifically and identifiably benefit the residents of the City of Pasco; that the amount of available public right-of-way is limited and the franchisee’s structures prevent future use of the right-of-way; that the structures as proposed constitute a potential traffic hazard being placed within the “Clear Zone” of the traveling public; and there exists adequate property for the applicant to locate such structures within private property and away from any of the listed concerns. Page 6 of 15 Page 7 of 15 Pasco ' utchl 5 U ociates ” 719 Second Avenue,Suite 1250 Seattle,WA 98104-1706 206.382.9800 www.dksassociates.com DATE March 21,2017 TO Andrey Avetisyan,PE ~ Civil Engineer,City of FROM:Richard J H DKS Ass SUBJECT:Utility Pole Franchise Permit Application —Mobilitie,LLC Seattle,WA Portland,OR Salem,OR Oakland,CA Sacramento,CA Anaheim,CA Austin,T DKS has reviewed the application for franchise permit application regarding the installation of new utility poles within the City of Pasco.We offer the following in regards to traffic related issues associated with the proposed: Additional utility poles increase the risk of fixed object type collisions by creating additional fixed objects within the clear zone of the traveled way as defined in WSDOT Design Manual 1600-3. Additional installations near existing driveways,alleys,or intersections increase the risk of angle-type collisions by adding sight-distance obstructions,i.e.blocking turning traffic from having a clear sight triangle of the intersection,pedestrians and on-coming vehicles. In order for these utility pole installations to be permitted within the public right-of-way,a significant benefit to the public should be demonstrated.This should be shown in the context of offsetting the decreased safety environment created by the introduction of these significantly sized fixed objects within the public right-of-way {Tf;l<;:ar.;e.’.om‘-:>.E*'ixr-ed(f..)bje<;t|r1(,:r<;2as<£> i)rivm’s:-;Eiiglst %,mo irnpedirmien!‘ Page 8 of 15 .~ocm ~50!(0 RECEIVED-I 1 ® DEC‘8 2016 ___ ‘M PASCO CITYCLERK intelligent infrastructure SITE ID-CANDIDATE LETTER/CASCADE ID-CANDIDATE LETTER: 9WABOO1642B/SP9OXS319B LATITUDE /LONGITUDE: ‘‘46.238048 —119.107426 _TE YOU DTG IN ANY STATEA3DTAL811FORTHELOCAL II©~FI%mIr * ‘N.14TH AVE.&W.HENRY ST.DRAWN BY:K.C CHECKED BYI J.R THE UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN ARE FOR THE CONTRACTORS . CONYENIENCL ONLY THERE MAY BE OTHER TJTTLTTIESNOT SHOWN _ i ON THESE PLANS THE ENGINEER/SURYEYDRASSUMES NO ’, 1 RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE LO—CATIoNs SHOWN AND IT .HALL BE 4 THE CONTRACTORSRESPONSIETLTTVTO .ER'FV ALL THE UYTLTTTES WITHTN THE LIMIT:or THE woRI<ALL DAMACE MADE To THE (EJI CUE”COWENTS UTTLIYTESav ma aomamoa SHALL as me SOLE (L a Y RESPONSTETLTTYor M cowsm )*7’“"5 W0”DRAWN“ GENERAL NOTES LOCATTON MAPS I PROJECT DESCRTPTTON THE FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABFATION A VTONTTYVIAP REGION AL MAP END USER PROPOSES TO INSTALLEQUIPMENT ON A NEW WOOD TECHNICIAN WIL ‘ISTT THE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR ROUTINE —A —A _POLE WTTHTNAN EXISTING R|<3r4T—Of—WAY MAINTENANCE.PROJECT WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT THE SCOPE WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: DISTURBANCE OF EFFECT ON DRAINACE,NO SANITARY SEWER j T SERVICE‘POIABLE WATER OR TRASH DISPOSAL IS REQUIRED AND I —INSTALL A NEW WOOD UTILITY POLE WITH PROPOSED I NO COMMERCTAL SIONACE IS (N).T cwmwswys,BACKHAUL TRANSPORT EQUIPMENT In sum 3 Elernerrtarysc D ;I SITE VNEORMATTON 7 :2 .7 A f\ SITE ID 9WAEIOOIE42Es 5 ;_', CO’-/E5 ‘CASCADETD Spg0XS3T9a P T;2OI5 INTERNATIONAL OUILDINO CODE >a‘reensg 2OIA NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE ._AT.TUDE 46233048 9 TVA/ETA~222—G—2ORLATEST EDITION :.LOCAL BUTLDING/PLANNTNGCODE LONGITUDE —I I9-W26 ‘ SHE IID;*RLI°:,Eae:IJ3II;I:'mL ‘ magcnow or A Lmsan PROFESSIONAL cnogg 3TRgET N‘14TH ,'‘E 5;w HENRY 5T XNDFX ENGTNEER,T0 ALTER THIS DOCUMENT TCITY,STATE,ZIP PASCO,WA 99301 SWE SHHT NO 5 EU TTTLE \-E H COUNTY FRANKLIN COUNTY :4 TTTLESHEET LJURTSDICTTON:CITY OF PASCO _my _' .GN-T GENERAL NOTES I..«Ky «.GN-2 GENERAL NOTES PROPERTY OWNER.PUBLIC R|GHT—OT-‘AWAY _ ‘A ‘ I -V ~-~w»\'ON—3 OENERAL NOTES APPHCANT I L AVENUE,STE.200, SP"EX'““B'T P"‘°T0 3‘975 PLAN COSTA MESA‘CA 92626 SP—2 OYERALL STE PLAN APPLICANT JUSTTN WALLEY ‘_ PHONE:949-534-0704 ‘ I EV 1 ELEVAHONS EMAIL ,UsLInwo'Ie;©IIx:u':IIaI,.com I,_ PLEI PLUMBTNG &RISER DTAGRAM ‘ “‘M‘’“‘‘''‘‘‘5'EO—I EQUIPMENT DETAILS ENQINEER T A.4 EQ-2 EQUIPMENT DETAILS W" 2,‘E><—I E><C.-ATION DETAILS ><DINDUSTRIES JOSE FRIAS D ,5 1572 N BATAVIA ST.SUITE ID (714)947—3o93 |'$'°°'”"‘5 i E“ELRCWCAL SWABOMMZB ORANCETCA 92876 PROJECT NUMBER:9WABO01542B T I Wu K x‘*3 WC <;—I CROUNDINC-.... 3 ‘S—I EMBEDMENT DETAILS PASCOIWA 993°‘ I T TC-1 VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN NEWUT"-'TVW°°°P°'-5 DO NOT SCALE DRAVVTNGS I N I TC—2 PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHEETTITLE CONTRACTORS SHALL ‘/ERTFY ALL PLANS,(E)DIMENSIONS &FIELD I 2 V N \ T'TLE SHEET CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE &SHALL IMMEDIATELYNOTIFYTHE ’“°"" ARCHITECT/ENCINEERINWRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE = PROCEEDINO WITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME _.,._,_..SHEET NUMBER MAP DATA ©2OI.e GOOGLE MAP DATA 2OIs GOOGLE T-1 I I ,; P a g e 9 o f 1 5 e9c>7\~30!go R .-..,.ECEIVED ?illtle I I I ®_a m!eII:genI r‘IIasIrucIIIre intelligent infrastructure SITE ID:9WABOO1628B #_ SITE LOCATION: MOBILITIE,LLC 6605 BURDEN BLVD,PASCO,WA 99301 3: 811 BURDEN RD_&ROBERT WAYNE DR I 33:13:22:’%T.§.i1"§£II“I°JI?“3: Call belure you dig WASHINGTON canTwo Working Days Eefbre You mgv 1-800-STAKE IT EW UTILITY wooo POLE THE JOB SITE 3 SHALL IMMEDIATELYNOTIFYTHE ENGINEER IN VIIRITINGor ANY DISCREPANCIES sEI=oRE PROCEEDING mm me WORK on EE REsI=oNsIeLE FOR SAME L PROJECT DESCRIPTIONGENERALNOTESLOCATIONMAPS VI N M MOEILITIEPRDPOSES TO cowsmucr A NEW MINIMACRD WIRELESS FACILITY WITHIN me THE FACILITV IS NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION A TECHNICIANWILL VISIT THE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR IE)RIGHT 07 WI“THE§C0FE W“-L CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING ROUTINE MAINTENANCE THE PROJECT WILLNOT RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT DISTUREANCE OR ’'“5T"LL °"E III 35 4'U7“-"V WOOD VOKE MNEFFECTonDRAINAGE‘no SANIIARV sEwER SERVICE.POTABLE wArER,OR TRASH oIsI=osAL IS zaimuwe 0-5‘''“5“‘”°"E ‘'3 °M“"”‘”EC“°N““"75"” REQUIRED AND NO COMMERCIALSIGNAGE IS NEW 5 'INSTALL ONE (‘J UE RE‘-AV 3 .INSTALLon:m cps ANTENNA R.INSTALL ONE m REMOTE RADIOHEAD Fmxo Dr .INSTALLONE (I)Ac DISTRIBUTIONPANEL.INSTALLONEUIMETERSOCKET.INSTALLONE (1)NEMAJR mscomuecv SWITCHSITEINFORMATION_5.-Iusvwwomauazirseox APPLICANT MOEILITVE APPLICANT AooREss 2955 RED HILLAVENUE.sre zoo,cosu MESA.cA seezs . «nu-um v —.20\2 mrERuAr>ouAL BUILDINGCODE PUBLIC ROWIPRIVATE PROPERTV PUBLIC Row n 1».-=-9,,-~$3,4E:‘A;gI‘I3A;SLRElcAfTREI§ALEg|c%u§N ,1 ,5 A WOLWON OF LAW FOR my PERSON‘ mmumss W NEW SITE 9 .LDCALEUILDING/PLANNINGCODE D,ggggggg;»;:;g+;g;'gg;g;g;g§AL uemzesr Amsi 116270027 4 SITELATITUDE 4E’I6"i44 N(Ms27os5s)TE SITE LONGITUDE .n9-mz 9“w(-119175799)I sn_E |D _ GIS TYPE CASSVF INADE3) SHEET NO SHEET TITLE ' GROUND ELEV/mo“5”mm 1.1 TITLE sneer 9WAB001628B - L2 GENERAL N0,“seas BURDEN awn PASCO,wA 993m. CDUNW FRANKLINComm,H GENE“NOTES BURDEN Rn.A ROBERT WAYNE DR JURISDICTION CITV or PASCO A4 SITE puns NEW UTILITYWOOD POLE A»?west 4.new ELEVATIONS A-3 scum 5 NORTH ELEVATIONS D4 DETAILS -a D4 DEWLS SHEET TITLE E-I ELECTRICALPLAN G-I cnouuuwe PLAN E E TC-I TRAFFIC CONTROL I=I.ANs TC-2 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS MDEILITIE LLI:xn INDUSTRIES 2955 RED HILL AVENUE,STE zoo,1572 N EATAVIAST sum;1D SHEET NUMBER COSTA MESA,CA 92525 ORANGE,cA 22575 APPLICANT:JUSTIN WALLEY conucr JOSE FRIAS PHONE:949»584—O‘/U4 PHONE 114 947 3993 EMAIL:IuslmwaiIey@IlbuIIIIIy cum EMAIL ?rIas@xd—Ind.com - P a g e 1 0 o f 1 5 WASHINGTON Cali Twi)WurkirinDays Eeioie vim nine 1-800—STAKEIT Dig Alert Km wha|'s below. Call belore you dig DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS.EXISTING DIMENSIONS s FIELD coNoinoNs on mE JOE SITE 3.SHALL IMMEDIATELY Norirv THE ENGINEER iN WRITING or ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PRDCEEDING WITH THE WORK ore BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME mobilitie intelligent infrastructure SITE ID: @965 i-ac:i go RECEIVED DEC'8 2015 PASCO CITYCLERK CASCADE ID: WAXOOO804A /SP9OXCO44A SITE LOCATION: 7421 SANDIFUR PARKWAY,PASCO WA,993001 SANDIFUR PKWY &N.RD.68 NEW UTILITY STEEL POLE GENERAL NOTES THE FACILITY is Not FOR HUMAN HAEITATION A TECNNICIANWILL visir THE sirE AS REQUIRED FOR LOCATION MAPS I ROUTINE MAINTENANCE ms PROJECT wiLL NOT RESULT IN ANY SIGNIFICANT oisrunsANi:E on EFFECT ON DRAINAGE No SANITARY SEWER sENvicE,FOTAELE WATER,OR TRASH DISPOSAL is REQUIRED AND No COMMERCIALSIGNAGE is NEw SITE INFORMATION APPLICANT APPLICANT ADDRESS PUBLIC ROWIPRNATE PROPERTY NEAREST ADDRESS NEAREST Aimisi SITE LATITUDE SITE LONGITUDE Gis TVPE: GROUND ELEVATION MOBILITIE 2955 RED HILL AVENUE STE 200,COSTA MESA.ca 92525 PUBLIC ROW mi SANDIFUR PARKWAVPASDD WA.993001 H6-I40-D039 46'1610 or N (45 2777917 419‘I1‘15 ?"W1-115157757) cnaavr imnesi 2511 AMSL 2955 RED HILLAVENUE:STE 2&0!cosm MESA.CA 92626 APPLICANT STEVEN BERKE PHONE:20524943641 EMAIL:Maven neri<e@rnobiiiiie.ccm cuumv FRANKLIN COUNTV JURISDICTION‘CITV or PASDO P ROJ ECT TEAM MOBILITIE LLC XD INDUSTRIES 1572 N EATAVIAsr SUlTE1D ounce:CA 52376 councr JOSE FRIAS PHONE 714 947 ms: EMAIL iinas@xa—ina com VICINITY MAP SITE LOCATION | W Mi ‘IDI]‘i«"'.u Em r1‘'1,’i*~'~*‘* NEW SITE 2 _.m,_1r‘\:I».V:Z I‘? C- ,.~ 3-,:» E J 1 C. 2Tr}'0 7 1:;I at fiirrt-Er git...‘H, Ri~iIi,'(‘Ir a I‘I,‘n‘iyI'l:'Pm :’::?3BortinComK PROJECT DESCRIPTION MOBiLiTlE_LLc PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT A NEW TRANSPORT sirE WITHIN AN EXISTING RIGHT or WAV THE SCDFE wiLL CONSIST or THE FOLLOWING.INSTALL0NE(I7-G0‘-0‘UYiLlW STEEL i>oi.E.INSTALLONE ii)-2x3 DUAZITE BOX ENGINEERING.zuiz INTERNATIONAL BUILDINGCODE.2014 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.TiAIElA~222-G-2 on LATEST EDITION.LOCAL BUILDING/PLANNING CODE I DRAWING INDEX SHEET ND SHEET TITLE T-1 rirLE SHEET 772 GENERAL NorEs 1.3 GENERAL NOTES A4 SITE PLANS A—2 sour»&EASY ELEVATIONS D-I DETAILS E4 ELECTRICALPLAN G4 GwouNmNG PLAN S—I STRUCTURAL DETAILS T04 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS TC-2 TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS II1obI'Iitié nLe.:i;ei~:ii‘iIYaSIVJC’Li'€ MOBILITIE,LLC C C DRAWNBY MR DATE 10/27/2016 F REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 05/15/2016 90"/LICONSTRUCTIONMR I 10/27/2016 TEMPLATEUPDATE MR NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION or uxw FOR ANY PERSON uNLEss THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION or A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT SITE ID: 9WAX000804A CASCADE ID: SP90XC044A 1421 SANDIFUR FARKWAYFASCOwa,eszuui. SANDIFUR FKVW is NJ?!)65 NEW STEEL UTILITYPOLE SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER T-1 P a g e 1 1 o f 1 5 1::3]mobiIItie° Intelhgenl InfrastructureI®, -.«VIIit‘I I N1 4 intelligent infrastructure SITE ID:CASCADE ID: 9WAXOOO803A/SP9OXCO43A SITE LOCATION: _ 701-799 NORTH 17TH AVE.PASCO,WA 99301 .. N.17TH AVE.&w.SYLVESTER ST. MOBILITIE,LLC DRAWN BY: 05/21/2016 Dig Alert Ibelo .Kngg?aéiloreyovjdlg. WASHINGTON Cau Two Warkmg Days EEIOIEYou Dig‘ 1-800-STAKE IT DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS suacoN7RAcroR SHALL vERIEv ALL I=LANs.EXISTING DIMENSIONS A FIELD coNoIrIoNs 0N ms JOE sIIE a SHALL IMMEDIATELYNonrv THE ENGINEER IN WRITING or ANv DISCREPANCIE5 BEFORE vRocEEnINs WITH rNE woRI<on BE RESPONSIBLE FOR sAM E NEW UTILITYSTEEL POLE LOCATION MAPS VICINITY MAP SITE LOCATION GENERAL NOTES PROJECT DESCRIPTION MoIaILI7IE,LLC I=RoI=osEs TD DDNSTRUCT A NEWIRANSPORT sIrE wm-IIN AN ExIsIINs RIGHT or WAY THE scoPE wILL coNsIsv or ME FOLLOWINGINEFACILITYISNOTmaNIIMANHAEITATIONArEcNNIcIANWILLVISITTHESITEAsREcIuIREuFOR RourINE MAINTENANCE THE PROJECT \MLL NOT RESULT IN Aw sIsNIrIcANI DISYURBANCEon EFFECT on aRAINA<;E,No SANITARYsEwER sERvIcE,POTABLE wArER,oR TRASH DISPOSAL Is REouIREn AND No COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE Is NEw NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION -INSTALL oNE III 7 Issue“UTILITYsIEEL POLE SITE INFORMATION APPLICANT MOEILITIE APPLICANTAnuREss zass RED HILLAVENUE sIE zoo cosIA MEsA.cA szazs PUBLIC ROW/PRIVATE vRoI=ERrv PUELIC Row IT IS A VIOLATION or LAW FOR ANv PERSON. uNLEss THEY ARE Ac1INs UNDER THE NEAREST Ant-Rsss 7nI—7awNORTH mu AVE FASCO,wA wsm am:INTERNATIONALBUILDINGcoI>E DIg5¢1.;,N OF A LICENSED EROEESSIONAL ZN NWONM ELECWICAL CODE ENGINEER T0 ALIERTHIS DOCUMENT NEAREsrA=N<sI II2.2uI.IIsa ‘ SITE LAIIIMDE 4B“M‘?1.l"N{4G mmp SITE ID: SITE LONGITUDE -H9'D6‘AI‘l 4“w(-1I9 III2IsI 9WAXooo8o3A W DRAWING INDEX cAsc,,,,E,.,. mm ELEVATION :57}AMSL SHEET No.SHEET WLE sp9oxco43A 701-799 NORTH 17m AVE RAsco.WA 99301COW”WWW"°°”NW 7““LE SHEET N 17TH AVE aw svLvEs7ER ST Iunssnscnan»cIIv o:I>Asco I-2 GENERAL NoIEsNEWSITEIE3GENERALNorEs A4 SITE PLANS A-2 wEsI I.scum ELEvArIoNs 0.1 aE7AILs E—1 ELECTRICALPLAN 54 GROUNDINGPLAN s71 srRucmRAL DETAILS TC—I YRAFFIC coNmoL PLANS 7<;2 TRAFFIC coNrRoL PLANS NEW STEEL UTILITYPOLE SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET PROJECT TEAM MOBILITIE LLC xv INDUSTRIES 2955 RED HILL AvENuE,EIE zun,I572 N BATAVIA 57 SUITE 1D SHEET NUMBER T-1 cosn MESA.CA 92625 ORANGE.CA 92375 APPLICANT:JUSTIN wALLEv cuumcr JOSE I=RIAs PHONE:94952340704 PHONE m 947 3093 EMAIL:IusunwaIIey@IIbIm|Ity com EMAIL IIrIa5@xd—Ir\dcam P a g e 1 2 o f 1 5 I"Dig Alert Know whars belowWCallbeforeyou dIg WASHINGTON Call Two Wnrkmg Days Eelme Van Dug‘ 1-800—STAKE IT DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS SUBCONTRAETOR SHALLVERIFY ALL PLANS EXISTING DIMENSIONS A FIELD CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE 5 SHALL IMMEDIATELYNorIFv TI-IEENGINEER IN WRITING oF ANV nIScRePANcIeS BEFORE PRDCEEDINC mm we WORK oR EE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME GENERAL NOTES we FAcILIrv IS NOT FDR HUMAN HAEITATION A TECHNICIAN WILLVISIT THE SITE AS REQUIRED FOR RouTINe MAINTENANCE THE PROJECT wILL Nor RESULT IN ANv SIGNIFICANT DISTURBANCE oR EFFECT oN DRAINAGE:ND SANITARV SEWER SERVICE,POTAELE WATER.oR TRASH DISPOSAL Is REQUIRED AND NO coMMeRcIAL SIGNAGE IS NEW SITE INFORMATION APPLICANT MOBILITIE APPLICANT ADDRESS 2955 RED HILLAVENUE:STE zoo:cosTA MESA CA 92525 Puauc Row/PRIVATE FROFERTV PUBLIC ROW NEAREST ADDRESS FASCO WA 993m NEAREST APNI5)II7—33D423 SITE LATITUDE as-1555.5‘N I«s.2s549I SITE LONGITUDE -II9‘09‘40 9-w (419 151351) GIS TYPE cAazvF (NADB3) GROUND eLevATIoN L231 AMSL comm FRANKLINcouurv JURISDICTION CITY or FASCO PROJ ECT TEAM MOEILITIE LLC XD INDUSTRIES I572 N EATAVIA ST SUITE In ORANGE,CA 92876 coNrAc'r Jose FRIAS PHONE 7M 947 3093 EMAILII!I';is@x?-Ind cm 2955 RED HILL AvENuE_STE 200: COSTA MESA.CA 92525 APPLICANT:JUSTIN WALLEY PHONE 94555470704 euIAIL-pushn wa||ey@IIbu|IIIly cum e9e:~I-aoI(0 mobilitié intelligent infrastructure SITE ID:CASCADE ID: RECEIVED DEC-8 2015 PASCO CITYCLERK 9WAXOOO805A/SP9OXCO45A SITE LOCATION: PASCO,WA 99301 MADISON AVE.&HARTFORD DR. NEW UTILITY STEEL POLE I LOCATION MAPS SITE LOCATION | .YI'rC‘rIIesYouth Soccer Assoc-anor VICINITY MAP | PROJECT DESCRIPTION Ex? Y»/.,Iaqn L) r\-mm _: .=z..AlllI‘I.‘v1l4,]V m ,I. J -1 MOEILITIE.LLc PRoPoSES TO coNsTRucT A New TRANSPORT SITE WITHIN AN EXISTING RIGHT CF wAv THE SCOPE wILL CONSIST or THE FOLLOWING.INSTALL ONE (I).aoto“UTILITYSTEEL PoLE.INsTALLoNe(II-2xaouAzITeeox Inobil?ie InIeIIIgenI.In‘TasmIczL.:e MOBILITIE,LLC _‘ DRAWNBY MG DATE.06/21/2015 REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY D 06/21/2016 90%CONSTRUCT|ON CH 1 12/01/2016 UCINCORPORATED MG 2012 INTERNATIONALBUILDINGCODE zou NATIoNAL ELECTRICALcooe TIA/ElA—222rGr2OR LATEST EDITIDN LOCAL RDILDINCIPLANNINGcone ENGINEERING NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IT Is A vIcI.ATIoN or LAW FOR ANY PERSDN UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER:To ALTERTHIS DOCUMENT DRAWING INDEX SHEET N0:SHEET TITLE T—1 TITLE SHEET T-2 GENERAL NOTES T—3 GENERAL NOTES A»I SITE PLANS A-2 scum 5 WEST ELEVATIONS D—I DETAILS E—1 ELECTRICALPLAN G-I GRDUNDING PLAN 54 STRUCTURAL DETAILS TCPI TRAFFIC coNTRoL PLANS TC-2 TRAFFIC coNTRoL PLANS sure ID:‘ 9WAX000805A CASCADE ID: SP90XC045A PAsco:WA Suam. MADISONAVE 5 HARTFORD DR NEW STEEL UTILITY POLE SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER T-1 P a g e 1 3 o f 1 5 BILLOF MATERIALS CHART CENTER DESCRIPTION LINE (AGL)DIMENSIONS (HXWXD) MATERIAL STRENGTH GRADE Fy Fu GRADE Fy Fu A36 36 ksI 58 ksl A572-50 50 ksl 65 ksi A572»65 MATERIAL STRENGTH CHART I TOWER DESIGN NOTES S+’.N“.“.°’°‘ TOWER IS DESIGNED FOR EXPOSURE C TO THE TIA-222-G STANDARD ALL WINDSPEEDS ARE BASED ON 3 SECONDS GUSTS TOWER IS DESIGNED FOR A 90 MPH BASIC WIND IN ACCORDANCE WITH TIA—222—GSTANDARD TOWER IS ALSO DESIGNED FOR A 30 MPH BASIC WINDWITH 0 75 IN ICE ICE IS CONSIDERED TO INCREASE THICKNESS WITH HEIGHT DEFLECTIONS ARE BASED UPON A 60 MPH WIND TOWER STRUCTURE CLASS II FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS DETERMINED USING NORMAL SOILS,SITE SPECIFIC GEOTECH REQUIRED FOR FINAL DESIGN POLE MANUFACTURER NOTES ‘I THERMAL STUDY SHALL BE PREFDRMED BYTHE TOWER MANUFACTURER TO DETERMINEDIF THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT INSIDE TOWER IS BEING ADEQUATELY COOLED/HEATED AND PROVIDE A CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEM AS NECESSARY BY DESIGN. TOWER MANUFACTURER SHALL ENSURE THE TOWER IS WATERPROOF SO THAT THE INTERIOR COMPONENTS OF THE TOWER ARE NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY THE EXTERIOR ELEMENTS TOWER ANALYSIS CALCULATIONS AND THERMAL STUDY SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD WITH THE TOWER SUBMITTAL PACKAGE POLE SHAFT AND ALL PORT RIM STEEL TO BE 65 KSI ALLOTHER PLATE TO BE 50 KSI PROPOSED 3'—0" LIGHTNING ROD I I PROPOSED I ANTENNA EH (2)3“MICROWAVE DISH I.\I ANTENA -LI OVERALL HEIGHT WI APPURTENANCE 63'—D"AGL TOP OF TOWER 60‘—0"AGL TOP OF STEEL 5055“AGL ‘I3'—6“FOUNDATION FLANGE CONNECTION ELEVATION 23'—5“AGL BASE OF TOWER ________FINISHED GRADE AGL BOTTOM OF STEEL :13‘-D"BELOW FINISH GRADE PROPOSED 3'-U"LIGHTNING ROD ,1 PROPOSED ANTENNA > (2)3“MICROWAVE DISH ANTENA §I “E ~E 1 I I OVERALL HEIGHT WI APPURTENANCE 6350“AGL TOP OF TOWER 6010“AGL TOP OF STEEL 5055"AGL 13'-6"FOUNDATION J FLANGE CONNECTION ELEVATION 23‘-5“AGL BASE OF TOWER "AGL __FINISHED GRADE 020“AGL I I ‘ - I '__,'_BOTTOM or STEEL t13‘—0"BELOW FINISH GRADE GENERAL NOTES NEW EAST ELEVATION 24"x36“5CALE 3/“ II'xIT‘SCALE 3/32‘NEW SOUTH ELEVATION 24‘-xaa“SCALE 3II6“'-I I1'x’I7 SCALE 3/32 I1IobI'Iitié Ir"e-IIger!IrIIIasrrucIuIe MOBILITIE,LLC / r DRAWNBY MG DATE‘06/21/2016 REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY 0 06/21/2016 90°/oCONSTRUCTION CH 1 12/01/2016 UCINCORPORATED MG NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IT Is A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON‘ UNLESS msv ARE ACTING UNDER rI-IE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,To ALTER THIS DOCUMENT SITE ID: 9WAX000805A CASCADE ID: SP90XC045A FASCO‘wA 99301. MADISON AVE 5.HARTFORD DR NEW STEEL UTILITY POLE SHEET TITLE SOUTH &WEST ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-2 P a g e 1 4 o f 1 5 W” Page 15 of 15