Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-16-2017 Planning Commission Meeting PacketREGULAR MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER: YI. III. IV. V. PLANNING COMMISSION - AGENDA ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES: OLD BUSINESS: A. Special Permit B. Rezone VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Preliminary Plat B. Preliminary Plat C. Special Permit D. Special Permit E. Block Grant VII. VIII IX WORKSHOP: OTHER BUSINESS: ADJOURNMENT: 7:00 P.M. March 16, 2017 Declaration of Quorum February 16, 2017 Location of a Daycare in an "O" (Office) Zone (Kimberly Pack)) (MF# SP 2017-0011 Rezone from C-1 to C-3 (Mohinder Sohal)(MF# Z 2016-005) (Remanded) Volterra Estates, 32 Lots (P&,R Construction) (MF# PP 2107-001) (Continued) Chiawana Heights, 80 Lots (Ron Asmus) (MF# PP 2017-002) Location of a Beauty School in a C-3 Zone (Maria Segura)(MF# SP 2017-004) Shop Height Variance (Jacob Huston)(MF# SP 2017- 005) 2016 Consolidated Annual Performance Review (CAPER) (MF# BGAP 2017-001) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.com/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact staff for assistance. REGULAR MEETING PLANNING CALL TO ORDER: MEETING The meeting was called to order at 7:00pm by Chairman Cruz. POSITION MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT No. 1 Tanya Bowers No. 2 Kurt Lukins No. 3 Paul Mendez No. 4 Alecia Greenaway No. 5 Joe Cruz No. 6 Loren Polk No. 7 Zahra Roach No. 8 Pam Bykonen No. 9 Gabriel Portugal APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS: February 16, 2017 Chairman Cruz read a statement about the appearance of fairness for hearings on land use matters. There were no declarations. Chairman Cruz then asked the audience if there were any objections based on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness question regarding the items to be discussed. There were no objections. THE OATH: Chairman Cruz explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or affirmation. Chairman Cruz swore in all those desiring to speak. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Mendez that the minutes dated January 19, 2017 be approved. The motion passed unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: A. Special Permit Location of Portables at Chiawana High School (Pasco School District) IMF# SP 2016-0181 Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit to locate portables at Chiawana High School. He stated that there was nothing to add to the staff report since the previous meeting. Commissioner Bowers asked for clarification on the location of the proposed portables. -1- Commissioner Greenaway added that they would be located in the parking lot. Commissioner Mendez asked when the Master Plan would be developed and presented. Mr. White answered that he did not know. Commissioner Polk moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the February 16, 2017 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Polk moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the Pasco School District for the location of portable classrooms at Chiawana High School with the conditions as contained in the February 16, 2017 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Special Permit Location of a daycare center in an R -1-A Zone (Gloria Torres) (MF# SP 2016-017) Continued from the Januaru 18. 2016 meetina Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the special permit application for the location of the proposed daycare center. During the previous hearing and there were several issues expressed in terms of the number of students that would be in this home and the impact of parking on the neighborhood. The lot is about 50-60 feet wide and the parking required for the number of students proposed would take up the whole front yard. That would detract from the residential character of the neighborhood and of the home. Staff could not recommend the whole yard be paved to accommodate the number of students in the house. As an alternate, there is a space near the fence to the west for parking and also by the garage that would allow tandem parking. This would allow for 18 students. Staff is not recommending the special permit be approved for the full amount of students the applicant requested because of the parking situation. Commissioner Bowers asked staff if the applicants were interested in reducing the amount of students. Mr. McDonald replied that he did not believe they wished to reduce the number of students. Chairman Cruz asked the applicant if they were clear on the fact that if the special permit were to be approved, it would not be for the full amount that they are requesting. Gloria Torres and Esveida Uriostegui, 2411 E. George Street, nodded that they understood. There were no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. -2- Commissioner Lukins moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, to adopt the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom in the February 16, 2017 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Lukins moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit Gloria Torres for the location of a daycare center at 2411 E. George Street with conditions as contained in the February 16, 2017 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. B. Special Permit Location of a davcare center in an "O" Zoning District (Kimberly Pack) (MF# SP 2017-0011 Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit application for the location of a daycare center in an `O' (Office) Zoning District. Adjacent zoning designations to the proposed site include; R-1 (Low Density Residential), R-12 (Suburban) and `O' (Office). The applicant is proposing 18 small children (infants/ toddlers) utilize the property for the daycare and preschool services and has requested the Planning Commission's approval. Parking is not an issue on this site. There are a required total of 8 stalls. It is likely that 3-4 parking stalls might be used for playground space in conformance with WA Administrative Code Guidelines which would still leave 8 parking stalls — enough for the anticipated usage and number of teachers needed for the proposed student load. There have been findings proposed that would indicate approval of this application. Conditions # 14 and # 15 in the staff report or "catch all" findings that require conformance with state regulations as they go into far more detail and guidelines. Kimberly Pack, 3605 W. Ruby Street, spoke on behalf of her application. She passed out a packet to the Commissioner's and to Staff to be entered into the record. The packet contained information about the center, including the parent handbook. They currently have a center open on Ruby Street and are already a licensed provider with over 10 years of experience. Chairman Cruz clarified that the request was for a center consisting of 18 children, 3 teachers and 2 directors. There were 4 letters of support from potential customers and an introductory packet was provided. Commissioner Bowers asked the applicant if she was planning to move the current playground. Ms. Pack responded no. Commissioner Bowers stated that she is starting a new one. Commissioner Bykonen asked if there was direct access out of the building in the rear. It was clarified on a drawing that there was a back door. -3- With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact and development of a recommendation for City Council for the March 16, 2017 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. C. Preliminary Plat Voterra Estates, 32 Lots (P&R Construction) IMF# PP 2017-0011 Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the preliminary plat application for Volterra Estates. The property contains just over 17 acres of land located directly north of the Faith Assembly Church on Road 72. This site has had previous applicants for special permits for a corn maze and other activities. The church is now selling the property to P&R Construction, for a single-family development. This property is located within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The UGB is the area within the County that the community is supposed to direct development and is also included within the Comprehensive Plan as an area for low-density develop. It has been designated as such for over 35 years. Years ago through the Comprehensive Planning process the community determined that this was an appropriate location for single-family homes. The low-density designation would allow housing development between 2-5 units per acre. In this case, the applicant is applying for about 2 units per acre because there currently is no sewer to the neighborhood and there won't be for many years. As a result, they will need to use approved septic systems which requires larger lot sizes. The developer will be required to develop this plat according to all City standards and the specifications as outlined through the Engineering Department, meaning the streets will have to be paved and improved. Road 72 and the County road to the north, Wernett will be pave to City and County standards. Staff provided in the report the necessary review of items required by the State related to right-of-way, utilities, preventing overcrowding and other items along with a list of findings of fact that include information on requirements for improvements as well as a list of conclusions based on those finding of fact. A neighboring property owner submitted a letter to be a part of the record and that was distributed to the Commissioner's. The letter identified some concerns related to the condition of the streets surrounding the proposed development. Most of those concerns will be addressed as the developer progresses through the development process. Once this plat is approved by the City Council, the developer will have to submit construction drawings and those drawings will be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department to make sure they conform to all City standards for paved streets, drainage, etc. Essentially, the concerns outlined in the letter from Mr. Lenk will be addressed. As far as traffic is concerned, there will be more traffic as a result of this proposal but it is inside the urban growth boundary which is where the City is required to direct growth. Within the urban growth boundary as the community develops there will be more traffic which was why the City completed a traffic study years ago. Through that traffic study the City implements a traffic impact fee, which in this case is $709/lot. That money goes into a fund to eventually address needs for traffic lights, widening intersections, turn -pocket lanes, etc. It doesn't happen all at once but as the funds are collected and made available, improvements are made to the overall circulation Ie system west of Road 36 from the river to the north city limits. Mr. McDonald discussed concerns about overcrowding. Overcrowding is addressed through the city zoning regulations. Only 40% of the lots will be developed so there will be open space for the free movement of air and sunlight. There are setbacks that will have to be maintained to again, allow for open space and fire safety. In regards to parks, for small subdivisions like the one proposed, there is a requirement for the payment of park impact fees, around $1,400 which goes into a fund that can later be used for parks near the general vicinity. There were also concerns about lots fronting Road 72 and that this development should require a block wall or estate fencing. Typically in the newer areas where there are collector streets identified in the Comprehensive Plan, those types of walls are required. Unfortunately in the Riverview Area, there are pre-existing conditions, such as two existing homes that already face Road 75, making it difficult for a portion of the road to have a block wall. Across the street the pattern is already set with houses with driveways to Road 72 and the same up to Argent. There is no plan for this development to have a block wall to parallel Road 72. Staff did have a concern relative to the two cul-de-sacs for interconnection between Wernett and Road 72. It would be better if the street went straight instead of having two cul-de-sacs meet. It helps with circulation as well as looping of utilities. Staff would also like the hearing to be continued until the March 16, 2017 meeting. This property is divided into two parcels and when the notifications were sent out, it was done from only one parcel instead of two so half of the surrounding property owners were notified but the property owners to the north were not properly notified. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, added that late in the day, Staff also received two additional letters from neighboring property owners which were distributed to the Commission and into the record. The letters voiced the same concerns as Mr. Lenk's letter. Commissioner Bowers asked what the process is for trying to eliminate the proposed cul- de-sacs and instead have straight-thru roads. Mr. McDonald responded that it was something the Planning Commission will have to determine, whether the proposed plat is acceptable or if the street should go straight-thru and interconnect with Road 72 and Wernett. Staff has it included as one of the conditions in the staff report that that be the case. Commissioner Portugal asked for clarification about septic tanks and sewer. Mr. McDonald answered there is no sewer in the general vicinity. The closest sewer line is in Court Street. The property is roughly 10 feet lower than Court Street and with the elevation difference sewer cannot go north. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan calls for a lift station down towards Chiawana Park Boat Basin but that lift station won't be built for many years. In the meantime like most of these areas that have been annexed will need Health District approved septic tanks. The applicant has initially approached the Health District but there is still some additional work they need to do. They may or may not get the total 32 or 34 lots. Commissioner Mendez asked if the Commissioner's decide the street needs to connect Wernett and Road 72, would that decrease the number of lots. -5- Mr. McDonald responded that they may lose a lot if the streets are connected which is the primary reason they proposed the cul-de-sac. Steve Bowman, 6159 W. Deschutes Avenue, Kennewick, spoke on behalf of P&R Construction. He stated that they have been working closely with Staff, particularly Dave McDonald, on coming up with a workable plat and there have been several revisions. Mr. Bowman said that he has spoken to many of the neighbors and has heard their concerns. He hopes to be a good neighbor in Pasco. Chairman Cruz stated that with the sewer and septic it is more than likely the Planning Commission will recommend the streets connect rather than having a cul-de-sac. He asked the applicant if that was going to be a problem for him. Mr. Bowman responded that they have looked at several designs. He asked what the concern was with the cul-de-sac. Chairwoman Cruz responded that one concern is the ingress and egress out of the lot and the issue with the usage of Road 72. Mr. Bowman added that their thought was that the public would rather have a cul-de-sac to keep it contained and not another thru-street that would be another "runway". Larry Gomez, 2105 N Road 72, spoke on this item. He stated that one of his main issues is traffic on Road 72. The road is narrow and there is already enough traffic from the church. He asked if there would be a traffic light or stop signs at each end of Wernett Road and Road 72, if there would be street lights or sidewalks and police patrol. He also wondered why the neighboring property owners were given the letter of notification days before the hearing. Jessie Rogers, 7309 Wernett Road, spoke on this item. He said that he has lived in this area for over 44 years and there were no homes around his property. Road 72 has become a congested area. There is a home in the middle and a well that is roughly 8-10 feet from the road. The well cannot be disturbed so the road can be widened down to her home, then get narrow to go by the well and at the spot the road is only 16 feet wide. He expressed his concerns and went into detail about current traffic issues and was worried that more traffic would add to the existing problems. Another issues he discussed was elevation and water drainage. He submitted photos into the record of water drainage issues and was concerned that additional homes will worsen the water drainage problems with additional irrigation and water run-off. He felt that increasing the lot sizes to '/2 acres would help control the amount of increased water drainage. Commissioner Portugal asked if the Police Department has been contacted regarding the traffic issues. Mr. Rogers replied that he has contacted the Police Department but since the road is in the County the police have not come out. The Sheriff has come out occasionally but nothing is done about it. Chairman Cruz discussed the traffic related to the church and school. The issue related to church and school traffic has been discussed in front of the Planning Commission on several occasions but it isn't in the purview for this particular application. ®. Jaycey Moore, 2205 Road 72, spoke on this item. Her and her husband submitted letters to be a part of the record. Their main concern was the roadways. They see near misses of accidents and pedestrians already and with new homes, traffic will increase. The development could create a positive impact, however, perhaps not negative. This provides a chance for road improvements. They would like to see the roadway widened - there are currently issues with the road being too narrow and the increased traffic along with additional homes facing Road 72 will make matters worse. She added that her family has also called the Police Department on several occasions relating to traffic and high speeds. Chairman Cruz reminded the audience that some of the street and traffic issues will be improved by the applicant as the plat is developed. Ms. Moore asked how the roads are maintained and who would maintain the road - City or County? Mr. McDonald responded that both the City and County engineering departments would work out an agreement on who would maintain the roads and which sections. Roger Lenk, 1817 Road 76, spoke on this item. His property abuts the proposed plat at the southwest corner. He noted that the County Public Work's Director was not aware of this preliminary plat and has not seen the plans but both Wernett and Road 72 are County roads. He stated that the neighboring properties need to know how many homes are going to be developed in this plat, whether it is 28 or 32, and how the County is proposing to develop the roads. Development is appreciated as currently the property is full of weeds and sometime unsightly but he had some development concerns about the proposed plat. He briefly went over the concerns and mitigating actions that were included in his letter he had submitted to the Planning Commission to be a part of the record. Some of the mitigating actions he would like to see were: fewer homes as a part of this plat which would help lessen the effects of the increase in traffic so incorporating .5 - 1 acre lots and block wall or common fencing along the outside properties so that abutting property owners are looking at mismatched fencing and the City of Pasco should take legal possession of the roads (Road 72 and Wernett). Rich Moore, 2205 N Road 72, spoke on this item. He stated that he didn't have an issue with the proposed development other than the narrow road that would need to be widened and improved and went into possible traffic mitigations. He added that he has called the Pasco Police Department as well as the County Sheriff regarding traffic and speeding issues. Darrel Johnson, 2420 Road 57, spoke on this item. He is the Pastor of the Faith Assembly Church. He clarified the preschool hours were from 9am-12pm so the traffic on Road 72 during other times of the day are not from the preschool. The church had intended to sell the proposed property years ago with the idea a senior living community would locate but that has never happened so they utilized the property for other special activities (i.e. corn maze and events) but would now like to sell to P&R Construction since they have to pay taxes on this property. Chairman Cruz addressed traffic issues relating to the church. Mr. Johnson replied that has reminded his congregation about speed limits but there is only so much he can do to stop speeding traffic. -7- Jessie Rogers, 7309 Road 72, spoke again on this item. He discussed issues with the grade and the right of way on Wernett. The property owners don't want a ditch on either side of the road on Wernett as it would fill up with Tumbleweeds and never get cleared. Roger Lenk, 1817 N Road 76, spoke again on this item. He asked if the staff report for the next hearing will include the final copy of the proposed plat. Mr. McDonald shook his head yes. Steve Bowman, 7114 Maxim Court, also the applicant, spoke as a resident and not just the applicant. He discussed many of the traffic issues and how they would be mitigated. Mr. Bowman added that he has tried to follow City code with the proposed development. He noted that the drainage on Wernett is a problem. He addressed the mitigating action proposed by some members of the audience calling for larger lot sizes to decrease run-off but he didn't feel that would solve the problem. Commissioner Bowers asked if it would benefit the proposed plat if Pearl Street was finished and extended just east of the proposed site. Mr. McDonald answered that it would be difficult to require this developer to do so but it could be completed at a later time when the additional parcel is developed by a separate developer. He added that there are no sidewalk requirements because when Riverview was annexed the residents did not want sidewalks because they wanted to retain the RS - 20 character that existed at the time. There were no further questions or comments. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Polk, to continue the public hearing to the March 16, 2017 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. With no further discussion or business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 8:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, David McDonald, City Planner REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2017-001 HEARING DATE: 02/16/17 ACTION DATE: 03/16/17 APPLICANT: Kimberly Pack 3605 W. Ruby St Pasco WA 99301 REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a daycare center in an "O" Zoning District 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 5, Block 2, Mottner's 2nd Addition, Less ROW Easement General Location: 4013 W. Court Street (Parcel # 119 154 148) Property Size: Approximately .3 acres. 2. ACCESS: The site has access from W. Court Street 3. UTILITIES: The site is served by municipal water and sewer. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned "O" (Office), and developed with an office building. Surrounding properties are zoned as follows: North R-1 - Single-family dwelling units East "O" - Office South RS -12- Single-family dwelling units West "O" - Office 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Comprehensive Plan for commercial uses. The Plan does not specifically address daycare centers, but elements of the Plan encourage the promotion of orderly development including the development of zoning standards for off-street parking and other development. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, the Notice of Application and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. ANALYSIS Applicant is requesting to locate a "Toddler only" daycare/ preschool center in an office zone. The daycare /preschool center would be located at 4013 W. Court Street. Court Street is an arterial street. The Infant/Toddler center would serve 18 children ages 1-2'/2, and would utilize 3 teachers and 2 directors. Daycare/preschool centers serving over 12 children per day require review via the Special Permit process. The location contains a 1,600 square -foot office building. Applicant wishes to convert the office space to a classroom with kitchen and separate hand washing sinks and diaper changing stations. A small playground would be added outside to the rear of the building (see site plan). Applicant currently operates a licensed Childcare/ Preschool center at 3605 W Ruby Street in Pasco which operates Monday through Friday from 7:00 am to 5:30 pm. Pasco Municipal Code 25.78.170 requires one parking space for each employee and one space per 6 children. With a proposed 18 -child center the maximum on-site parking requirement for this site would be 5 stalls for employees plus 3 stalls for children's parents/ guardians, for a total of 8 stalls. There are currently at least 14 parking stalls on-site. The proposed playground as shown on the application will likely displace 2 to 4 parking spaces near the rear doors of the building. This would still leave 10-12 spaces for parents/ guardians and staff. The center would be required to meet all Department of Early Learning requirements. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Applicant wishes to locate a daycare /preschool center for 18 children ages 1-2'/2, in an office zone. 2. Daycare/ preschool centers serving over 12 children per day require review via the Special Permit process. 3. The Infant/Toddler center would utilize 3 teachers and 2 directors. N 4. The daycare/preschool center would be located at 4013 W. Court Street. 5. Court Street is an arterial street. 6. The location contains a 1,600 square -foot office building. 7. Applicant plans to convert the office space to a classroom with kitchen and separate hand washing sinks and diaper changing stations. 8. A small playground would be added outside to the rear of the building (see site plan). 9. Applicant currently operates a licensed Childcare/ Preschool center at 3605 W Ruby Street in Pasco which operates Monday through Friday from 7:00 am to 5:30 pm. 10. Pasco Municipal Code 25.78.170 requires one parking space for each employee and one space per 6 children. 11. With a proposed 18 -child center the maximum on-site parking requirement for this site would be 5 stalls for employees plus 3 stalls for children's parents/ guardians, for a total of 8 stalls. 12. There are currently at least 14 parking stalls on-site. 13. The proposed playground as shown on the application will likely displace 2 to 4 parking spaces near the rear doors of the building, leaving 10-12 spaces for parents/ guardians and staff. 14. The center would be required to meet all Department of Early Learning requirements. 15. The Daycare Center, owners, and staff will be required to be licensed by the State of Washington Department of Early Learning (DEL) and conform to regulations found in WAC 170-295. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 and determine whether or not the proposal: 3 (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The site is identified in the Comprehensive Plan for Commercial uses. The Plan encourages the promotion of orderly development including the development of zoning standards for off-street parking and other development standards. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The site is served by all municipal utilities and the local street network. Court Street was designed to handle commercial traffic. The proposed daycare center will likely operate 10.5 hours per day 5 days per week (7:00 am -5:30 pm). (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The intended character of the area is primarily commercial. The proposed use would be operated as a commercial enterprise. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The proposed daycare center would be located in an existing structure and run as a commercial enterprise in an Office zone. The use would not be any more intensive than other uses permitted in the Office zone. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The proposed daycare center would not generate more noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the Office Zoning District. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposed daycare center would not create nuisance conditions or endanger public health or safety any more than the operation of any permitted uses within the Office Zoning District. PROPOSED APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to 4013 W. Court Street (Parcel #119 154 148) 2) Number of children shall not exceed 18. 3) The proposed playground shall not displace any required parking and shall generally conform to the site plan as submitted. 4) The daycare center, owners, and staff shall conform to all applicable State of Washington Department of Early Learning (DEL) regulations. 5) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit for the authorized improvements is not obtained by January 1, 2018. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the March 16, 2017 staff report. MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit for the location of a daycare center at 4013 W. Court Street (Parcel #119 154 148), with conditions as listed in the March 16, 2017 staff report. 5 W 2�+ `o owwoo Z N3 p p m u o O O a ot, aeon U ct H F— Q a m � i w� LL ct cn u a� ,� sna=iS p Of I 0 W V17771 O 3 N Or- TOO' °o U ov Gvo0 j U Q U) (n m D oo � O a � � � N in. ULI TOO' V� U F t to z N � �-� 0 4�0 1v+uriQ Y - aro- c:cl ��oj5YUCK Y : �i4 Kit�he�. 014 � <, CL 1 t Chrl0 rl loiL Witt c!7 2 H 04 4r a. if '. e. _C.. •� � } � � 1� 4:1d �.! ! r �. �- ��f� �� � � � �.� ��11�4'! t ,r' i ;, T li � � i i .....�«. .... _ ... Rft1A 3'illi�i� { [ �� � � ��: ,,� � y ,-�. _.. 1 + � \\ x, ,,,�' � ;�� �� ,. .. , � ,� a 4 i= w 0 i _ i�, ��. (I !, � y� � � a W= I IE Q .. v 'x 9l " �6 14a1L. MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 2017 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner SUBJECT: Rezone: Loyalty Inn C-1 (Retail Business) to C-3 (General Business) (MF# Z 2016 -005) On November 17, 2016 the Planning Commission held a hearing to consider rezoning the Loyalty Inn property on West Lewis Street from C-1 to C-3. The property owner requested the rezone to operate a U -Haul business in conjunction with the motel. U -Haul businesses require C-3 or industrial zoning to be licensed in the City. Following the hearing the Planning Commission recommend the Loyalty Inn rezone be denied. The denial was based on the findings listed in the attached staff report. The applicant then appealed the recommendation and the Council held a hearing on the appeal at their February 3, 2017 meeting. Following Council debate the matter was remanded to the Planning Commission with instructions to consider a rezone with a concomitant agreement. The Loyalty Inn property is located on a gateway street and as such many of the high intensity land uses permitted in the C-3 district may not be appropriate for the site. When considering a concomitant agreement the list of permitted uses should exclude heavy machinery sales and service, lumber yards, landscape storage yards, contractor facilities, mobile homes sales, trucking firms, truck stops, towing impound yards and related or similar uses These types of uses are generally found near industrial centers but not adjacent to residential neighborhoods. Restricting the more intense C-3 uses would essentially cause the rezoned to similar to C-1 zoning. A concomitant agreement for the property should include the following: • All uses permitted in the "O" and C-1 Districts plus the rental of domestic trucks and trailers not exceeding 24 feet in length. No more 12 rental vehicles are permitted on-site per day. All other C-3 uses are prohibited. Any action taken by the Council to rezone the property will need to be supported by findings. The following findings can be used to support a concomitant agreement for a rezone to C-3. 1. The site contains the Loyalty Inn. 2. The site is currently zoned C-1. 3. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for commercial uses. 4. Commercial uses include all uses contained the in "O", C-1, CBD, C-3, BP and CR Districts. 5. Comprehensive Plan Policy ED -213 encourages the development of a wide range of commercial uses strategically located to support local and regional needs. 6. When the site was developed in 1966 Lewis Street was one of the major highway routes through the community. 7. Lewis Street is no longer a main highway through Pasco. As a result the Loyalty Inn is no longer a first stop motel site. 8. The property is showing signs of disrepair. 9. Providing an opportunity for a greater range of commercial uses through a rezone may lead to better maintenance and upkeep on the property. 10. Six of the original eight motels located along Lewis Street have been demolished or mostly converted to other uses. 11. Most of the motels in Pasco are now located within a short distance from Highway 395 or 1-182. 12. Rezoning the property to permit additional uses may help the property to transition to other commercial uses that could provide funding to help arrest the physical decline that had occurred on the property. 13. The C-3 zone permits heavy machinery sales and service, lumber yards, landscape storage yards, contractor facilities, mobile homes sales, trucking firms, truck stops, towing impound yards and related or similar uses that may not add value and character to the neighborhood. 14. A concomitant agreement would be needed protect the general character of the neighborhood from the more intense uses permitted in the C-3 zone. Motion for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact as contained in the March 16, 2017 staff memo, z Motion for Recommendation: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council rezone the Loyalty Inn property from C-1 to C-3 with a concomitant agreement limiting uses on the property to all "O" and C-1 Districts plus the rental of domestic trucks and trailers not exceeding 24 feet in length. No more 12 rental vehicles are permitted on-site per day. All other C-3 uses are prohibited. 3 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: Z 2016-005 APPLICANT: Mohinder Sohal HEARING DATE: 11/17/2016 1800 W Lewis St ACTION DATE: 12/15/2016 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: REZONE: Rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) to C-3 (General Business) 1. Legal: Lots 2 & 3 Short Plat 2010-08 General Location: 1800 W. Lewis Street Property Size: 3.37 acres. 2. ACCESS: The parcel is accessible from Lewis Street and 18th Avenue 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are currently available to serve the site from Road 92. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The lot is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Business) and developed with the Loyalty Inn. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-1, R-2 & R-3 - Single & Multi -Family Residential SOUTH: C-1 - Offices EAST: C-1 &1"0" - Offices 8v Commercial WEST: C-1 -Offices 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial uses. Those portions of the community designated for commercial development by the Comprehensive Plan could be zone "O", C-1, C-2, C-3 CR and BP. Land Use Goal ED -2 encourages the appropriate location and design of commercial facilities within the City. ED -2-13 encourages the development of a wide range of commercial uses strategically located to support local and regional needs. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, the Notice of Application and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. 1 ANALYSIS The owner of the Loyalty Inn at 1800 West Lewis Street has petitioned to have the zoning for his motel property changed from C-1 to C-3. The motel has been struggling for many years to capture a reasonable share of the regional motel traffic. As a result the owner has been exploring various options to create additional revenue to maintain his property investment. One of the business options included renting U -Haul equipment as a means of generating additional funds to maintain his property. The U -Haul equipment created a problem because the property is not zoned correctly for a U -Haul facility. U - Haul rental facilities are required to be located in a C-3 or Industrial zone. Upon receiving notice to remove the U -Haul equipment from his property the owner applied for a rezone. There are currently no rental trailers or trucks on the applicants property. The site was annexed in 1961 and developed in 1966 with a motel. In 1966 Lewis Street was a main route through the community and consequently the applicant's property was well suited for a motel. Six of the original eight motels along Lewis Street have been demolished or mostly converted to other uses. In addition to the decline in room rentals at the motel property management issues have also been a concern. There have been 22 code enforcement cases filed against the property in the past six years. Most of the cases are nuisance cases involving unsanitary conditions, weeds trash and general property maintenance issues. There have also been building and licensing issues at the property. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for commercial land uses but does not identify what it should be zoned. The actual zoning of a parcel is determined thought the hearing process. Any one of the six commercial zoning districts could be considered for the property. The applicant is specifically requesting C-3 zoning because that is the only zoning district that will permit U -Haul rental facilities. The requested C-3 zone permits a number of uses that may not be appropriate for the surrounding neighborhood. Uses such as heavy machinery sales and service, mobile home and RV sales, landscape gardening and storage yards for equipment and materials, contractor storage and material yards, lumber yards, auto body shops, trucking and express storage yards and others uses that may not add to the value and character of the neighborhood. These uses could become nuisances in the neighborhood due to loud noises, vibrations, dust and other externalities associated therefrom. Because of these secondary effects it would be necessary to condition a rezone to C-3 by prohibiting the types of uses listed above. However, a conditioned rezone would still allow the storage and display of U -Haul or rental equipment adjacent one of the main gateway corridors into and out of the City. Fifteen to twenty years ago the City invested 2 considerable public funds to enhance the West Lewis Street entrance to the City by installing irrigation and landscaping along both sides of the street from 18th Avenue west to the freeway. The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC. 25.88.030. The criteria are listed below as follows: 1. The date the existing zone became effective: The current zoning classification was established on or before 1966. The property was annexed in 1961 but not developed with a motel until 1966. 2. The changed conditions, which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: Lewis Street is no longer the main highway through Pasco and as a result six of the original eight motels along Lewis Street have either been demolished or converted to another use. New Hotels/motels within Pasco are all located within a convenient distance to Highway 395 or I-182. However, Lewis Street is still an important gateway into the community and the City has invested considerably to enhance the appearance of the Lewis Street gateway. 3. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general welfare: The Loyalty Inn is no longer a first stop motel site. Without active marketing, management and upkeep the property will continue to decline increasing the possibility of public nuisances impacting neighboring property values. Rezoning the property may not address broader management issues. 4. The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property and the Comprehensive Plan: The property is currently commercial in nature. Rezoning the property to C-3 may help the property to transition partially to other commercial uses that could provide funding to stop the physical decline that is occurring on the property at the present time. However that is not guaranteed. The property has been the subject of numerous housing, property and nuisance code violations in recent years. Rezoning the property could alter the character of the neighborhood which consists of residential uses to the north and recently redeveloped commercial and offices uses to the east. The redeveloped properties to the east are zoned "O" and C-1. 5. The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted: 3 The owner has several options including upgrading the quality of the premises by actively managing tenants; creating retail pad sites for permitted retail uses, modifying the existing structures to include office space and investing in physical upgrades to the structures and property. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site contains the Loyalty Inn Motel. 2. The site was developed in 1966 with a motel when Lewis Street was one of the major highway routes through the community. 3. Lewis Street is no longer the main travel route through town however; it is still a major gateway into the community. 4. The City invested heavily into enhancing the Lewis Street gateway several years ago by improving landscaping and irrigation from 18th Avenue west to the freeway. 5. Most of the motels in Pasco are now located within a short distance of Highway 395 or I-182. 6. Six of the original eight motels along Lewis Street have been demolished or mostly converted to other uses. 7. The property is showing signs of disrepair. 8. The property has been the subject of numerous code cases (22) in the past six years mainly as the result of poor management practices. 9. Rezoning the property could alter the character of the neighborhood which consists of residential uses to the north and recently redeveloped commercial and offices uses to the east. The redeveloped properties to the east are zoned "O" and C-1. 10. The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for commercial land uses. 11. There are six commercial zones that could be permitted under the commercial land use designation. C-3 is one of those zones. 12. The site is currently zoned C-1 (Retail business). 13. Properties to the south, east and west are zoned C-1 or "O". 14. Properties to the north are zoned R-1, R-2 and R-3. El 15. The C-3 zone permits heavy machinery sales and service, mobile home and RV sales, landscape gardening and storage area for equipment and materials, contractor storage and material yards, lumber yards, auto body shops, trucking and express storage yards and others uses that may not add to the value and character of the neighborhood. 16. A rezone with a concomitant agreement will still permit the location of rental trucks and trailers to be located along a gateway entrance to the City. A concomitant agreement will not address on going management issues with the property. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1. The proposal is in accordance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and several Plan policies and goals. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial uses. Those portions of the community designated for commercial development by the Comprehensive Plan could be zone "O", C-1, C-2, C-3 CR and BP. Land Use Goal ED -2 encourages the appropriate location and design of commercial facilities within the City. ED -2-B encourages the development of a wide range of commercial uses strategically located to support local and regional needs. 2. The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will not be materially detrimental. The proposed C-3 zoning will permit additional commercial uses to locate on the site which may make it possible for the property to be better maintained and have less of a detrimental impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Without a rezone the property could continue to deteriorate. However, not all of the issues related to code enforcement cases on the property are related to zoning. Many of the code issues can be traced to poor management of the property. 3. There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole. There is merit in providing an opportunity for a greater range of commercial uses on the property that may lead to better maintenance and upkeep. Maintaining the property at a higher level could provide value to the neighborhood and community as a whole. Maintaining the property to a higher standard can also be achieved through improved management. 5 4. Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. If the property were to be rezoned conditions should be imposed to preclude the location of heavy commercial uses that would not be appropriate for this portion of Lewis Street. However, a concomitant agreement will not address ongoing management issues with the property. 5. A Concomitant Agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. A rezone with or without a concomitant agreement will not solve the ongoing issues dealing with property management. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the December 15, 2016 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council deny the proposed rezone of Lots 2 & 3 Short Plat 2010-08 from C-1 to C-3. no � 11 Commercial r 20TH AVE N N C 19TH AVE p o o _ c� IT1 m o < Z 0 /'' � U) w O mcn CO 18TH AVE �D Cn � � C Vs Z 17TH AVE m w 20TH VECD '� a n � � CD CD C7 j 19TH AVE o z p cr m m 70 � o r r w m to co 0 (j) Y .� 18TH AVE O n r w w cn V! Z 17TH AVE m �,Ag' M4, r O nM1 U\, r 0 0 Er o1r,O a tj It" IN `21 111111�14A S. MEMORANDUM DATE: March 16, 2017 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Volterra Estates (PP2017 -001) During the initial hearing on the proposed plat for Volterra Estates there was some confusion over the exact number of lots being proposed for the plat. After further review by the Health District and reconfiguring of the street layout to eliminate the double cul de sacs the final lot count was reduced from thirty-four to thirty. The revised plat is attached hereto. In addition to the questions about the number of lots in the proposed plat adjoining property owners testifying in the hearing expressed concern about traffic and existing road conditions. The questions that were raised are addressed as follows: Rd 72 is too narrow: The improved road surface of Road 72 is currently about 19 feet wide located partially in right-of-way and partially on private property. Part of the problem with Road 72 is the fact that the west half of the street abutting the proposed plat is currently missing. The developer will be dedicating the west half of Road 72 and improving the road to current standards for subdivisions in RS -20 zones. Without the road improvements, the final plat cannot be approved. There are no traffic lights: Traffic lights are seldom found in residential neighborhoods, they are primarily located at the intersection of arterial streets or major collectors intersecting with arterial streets. Even with the addition of 30 new lots in the neighborhood there will not be enough traffic to warrant a traffic light at Road 72 and Wernett. There is significantly more traffic at the intersection of Argent and Road 100, Road 100 and Court, Road 68 and Court and Burden and Road 44 and none of these intersections have traffic signals. It is highly unlikely there will ever be as much traffic at Road 72 and Wernett as there currently is at the referenced streets above. When Road 80 is fully widened from Argent to Court High School traffic will have a direct route from the school parking lot to Court Street. The school traffic currently cutting through the neighborhood will likely be reduced. No sidewalks: Sidewalks are not a required subdivision improvement in RS -20 and RS -12 zones. Prior to the major annexations in the 1990's the City formed a committee of County residents living in various neighborhoods within the donut to advise the City Council on appropriate development regulations for their neighborhoods in the event they were to be annexed. The committee requested that sidewalks be excluded from the subdivision regulations. The Council adopted the RS -20 and RS -12 zoning regulations with help from County residents and sidewalks were determined to be an optional development requirement. There will be no sidewalks in the proposed subdivision unless the developer chooses to install them. Four way stop signs: Four way stops signs are generally installed on existing streets after a warrant study by the Engineering Division. Stops signs may also be required as part of the plan review process when subdivision construction plans are being reviewed. Many single-family neighborhoods with higher densities than there will ever be in this neighborhood do not have four way stops on all intersections. Drainage: Addressing street drainage is a requirement of subdivision development. The developer will be required to include storm water drainage facilities in his construction drawings. The developer will be responsible for the drainage problems on his side of the street. The previous developers or property owners should have addressed the drainage problems on their side of the street when properties were divided and developed with homes. It is not the developer's responsibility for solving the drainage problems that were not addressed by the currently developed properties in the neighborhood. Asphalt driveways: Individual property owners are responsible for connecting their own driveways to City of County roads. The neighbors on the north side of Wernett currently have gravel driveway approaches to Wernett Road. There a properties allover West Pasco that have gravel approaches to paved streets. It is not the developer's responsibility to retro fit private driveway approaches with paved aprons. 2 County Coordination: Franklin County received a copy of the preliminary plat and submitted comments to the City. The County Memo is attached. The revised plat has been forwarded to the County for further review. The Planning Commission will need to refer to the attached staff report for suggest approval conditions and motions to recommend approval of the plat. 3 — w J 11-- _#_ / s OM lldNtl3M '� r �- _ p _ .�_ .- d �m14 RK 9e�... cz I II I d_ �I U umwwu t _ is tls� of t yyMR —aIII I 34 vi a>,� o?M qq o , i EHE QAAAO i 2yJ g� SM ill I17y y IRI 3 Y 4 W - n@ r W wi R LL ID„.R9 a I l H •1- FR I LI Ilk 'J I gl 8 Mb na: -rt 15 y } g ^@ li u3 �i'I 1i Rs 6 Q ;3 ____ _ l p1 U a O fl M5 ! �R•�- D -�0 bM'DDSDd fD AIIJ ayf µ UpSInIGMS b s g l sa4p4s3 njja�lon f 8' DTd "JNIiH3Nl`JN3 n l +'^ rof lqa A:o wuD:a — w J 11-- _#_ / s OM lldNtl3M '� r �- _ p _ .�_ .- d �m14 RK 9e�... cz I II I d_ �I U umwwu t _ is tls� of t yyMR —aIII I 34 vi a>,� o?M qq o , i EHE QAAAO i 2yJ g� SM ill I17y y IRI 3 Y 4 W - n@ r W wi R LL ID„.R9 a I l H •1- FR I LI Ilk 'J I gl 8 Mb na: -rt 15 y } g ^@ li u3 �i'I 1i Rs 6 Q ;3 ____ _ l p1 U a O fl M5 ! �R•�- g� — w J 11-- _#_ / s OM lldNtl3M '� r �- _ p _ .�_ .- d �m14 RK 9e�... cz I II I d_ �I U umwwu t _ is tls� of t yyMR —aIII I 34 vi a>,� o?M qq o , i EHE QAAAO i 2yJ g� SM ill I17y y IRI 3 Y 4 W - n@ r W wi R LL ID„.R9 a I l H •1- FR I LI Ilk 'J I gl 8 Mb na: -rt 15 y } g ^@ li u3 �i'I 1i Rs 6 Q ;3 ____ _ l p1 U a O fl M5 ! �R•�- Memo •FPublic Works Department To: Dave McDonald, City Planner, City of Pasco From: Craig Erdman PE, County Engineer cc: Matt Mahoney, Public Works Director, John Christensen, County Surveyor, Robert Mendez, Associate Engineer Date: February 14, 2017 Re: City of Pasco MF# PP 2017-001 Dave, We have reviewed the proposed short plat and have the following comments: • Wemett Road and the portion of Road 72 within the County must be brought up to current County Standards. • Lots fronting Wemett Road (Lots 1, 13, and 14 as drawn) will not be allowed access on Wernett Road. Lot 14 should access Road 72 at a minimum of 125 ft. from closest edge of the traveled way of Road 72 and the closest edge of the driveway. • Franklin County Public Works would like to review and provide comment on construction plans prior to final approval. REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2017-001 HEARING DATE: 2/16/2017 ACTION DATE: 3/16/2017 APPLICANT: P & R Construction 6159 W Deschutes Ave, Ste 509 Kennewick, WA 99336 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Volterra Estates, 30 -Lots 2. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: SW Quarter of the SW Quarter of Section 5, T9N, R29E, WM General Location: The S/W corner Road 72 and Wernett Road. Property Size: 17.85 Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 30 single-family lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 21,781 ft2 to 21,959 ft2 Average Lot Square Footage: 21,824 ft2 2. ACCESS: The property will have access from Wernett Road and Road 72. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water is located in both Wernett Road and at the southern end of the site in Road 72. There is no sewer service available to this site. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan calls for a lift station to be built west of Rd 84 to eventually serve properties near Road 72 and Wernett Road. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned RS -20 (Suburban Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: RS -20 - Single -Family (County Zoning) SOUTH: RS -20 - Faith Assembly Church EAST: RS -20 - Single -Family (County Zoning) WEST RS -20 - Single -Family (County Zoning) 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for low-density residential development. According to the Comprehensive Plan, low-density residential development means 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future land use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II, page 17) encourages development of lands designated for low-density residential uses when or where: sewer is available, the location is suitable for home sites, and there is a market demand for new home sites Policy H -1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU -2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non - Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11-355). ANALYSIS The project site is located between the Faith Assembly parking lot on the south and Wernett Road to the north. The site is currently vacant but has been used for a small farming operation in the past. The site is relatively flat and about 10 feet lower than Court Street. As a result it is impossible to have a gravity sewer line serve the property at the present time. At least two sewer lift stations will be needed to serve much of West Pasco between Court Street and Argent Road. The site in question is shown in the Comprehensive Sewer Plan to be served by the western most lift station to be built to the east of the Chiawana Park. The Faith Assembly Church is served by a private sewer lift station and pressure line connected to Court Street. The church lift station is a private lift station designed for one user only and cannot be used for the proposed subdivision. The proposed plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and RS -20 zoning related to lot sizes and densities. The proposed plat is also consistent with a recently approved Short Plat directly to the west of the developer's site. The proposal is also consistent with other nearby County developments such as Terray Estates (on Rd 76), Butter Creek Estates (1/4 of a mile to the east), Canter Club Estates (1/4 of a mile to the east) and Fieldstone Estates (687 feet to the north). The developer is proposing to develop 30 lots ranging in size from 21781 square feet to 21,959 square feet. Because the plat is in the process of being reviewed by the Health District the final number of lots may be reduced because of lot area requirements for drain fields. The layout of the plat with two cul de sacs rather than a single through street creates some design concerns related to water service and overall circulation. Two additional lots would be lost if the street was a through street rather than a cul de sac. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed Plat contains 30 residential lots. The lots vary in size from 21781 square feet to 21,959 square feet. The proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the RS -20 zoning on the site. z RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets which will be dedicated. The layout of the streets with two dead end cul de sacs is a design feature not favored by the engineering and planning staff. Where possible it is always preferred to place water lines under City streets rather than through residential lots. There are no special constraints on this property that would require two cul de sacs. UTILITIES: Municipal water lines are located in Wernett Road and in Road 72 at the southerly end of the proposed plat. The developer will be required to extend an 8 inch water line in Road 72 to connect with the line in Wernett Road. The property is in a location that cannot be served by the sewer line in Court Street due to elevation constraints. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan calls for a lift station to be built west of Road 84 at the end of the Army Corp of Engineers drainage ditch. The property in question would be connected someday to the future lift station by a sewer line draining to the west. Until sewer service is available the property will need to be granted a waiver for sewer connection to allow use of onsite septic systems. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not diminish the buildable area of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street and in accordance with the City's Fire Protection Masterplan. STREET NAMES: Street will be named prior to final platting. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines as a part of the infrastructure improvements. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code requires the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed 3 subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact": Prevent Overcrowding: Density requirements of the RS -20 zone are designed to address overcrowding concerns. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property in question be developed with 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Plat has a density of approximately 2 units per acre. No more than 40 percent of each lot is permitted to be covered with structures per the RS -20 standards. Parks Opens Space/Schools: Chiawana Park is located about a mile to the west (two miles in travel distance) and the Columbia River trail is about 3/4 of a mile to the south. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new dwelling unit at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The Plat is laid out for single- family development as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density permitted under the Comprehensive Plan is 5 dwelling units per acre. The developer is proposing a density of about 2 units per acre. The proposed development will include improvements to both Road 72 and Wernett Road. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are not required in the RS - 20 zone. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the Plat will be served with water and other utilities. Due to the elevation of the property onsite septic systems approved by the Health District will be used instead of a municipal sewer system. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This Preliminary Plat contains 30 residential building lots, providing an opportunity for the construction of 30 new dwelling units in Pasco. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitations, building height restrictions and building setbacks will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The streets through and adjoining the Plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained 4 to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by Road 72 and Wernett Road. The Preliminary Plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review. (The discussion under "Safe Travel' above applies to this section also.) Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates the Plat site for low-density residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings: • The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. • The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within the Urban Growth Boundaries. • The site is relatively flat but is about 10 feet lower than Court Street in elevation. The lower elevation creates difficulties for serving the property with a public sewer system. • The site is currently vacant. • The site is not considered a critical area, a mineral resource area or a wet land. • The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for low-density residential development. • Low-density residential development is described in the Comprehensive Plan as two to five dwelling units per acre. • The site is zoned RS -20 (Suburban Residential). • The site was zoned RS -20 when it was annexed in 2001. • The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the advancement of programs that promote home ownership and development of a variety of residential densities and housing types. • The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the interconnection of neighborhood streets to provide for the disbursement of traffic. • The interconnection of neighborhood streets is necessary for utility connections (looping) and the provision of emergency services. • Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 340 vehicle trips per day. • The current traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the developing areas of the City west of 20th Avenue. W • The current park impact fee is $1,420 per dwelling unit. The fee can be reduced by 58 percent if a developer dedicates a five acre park site to the City. The dedication of a fully constructed park reduces the fee by 93 percent. The property under consideration is too small for the dedication of a park site. • RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved. • The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective as of April 16, 2012. • Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools. • Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses. Except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements. • Plat improvements involving Wernett Road will need to conform to Franklin County standards as Wernett Road is fully within Franklin County • All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. • All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. • The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner that does not injure, annoy or endanger the comfort and repose of other property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including houses. • Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings must be created in 0 accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the PUD, the Pasco School District, Benton Franklin Health District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable and Ben -Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110.City Chiawana Park is located to the west and the Columbia River Trail is located to the south of the site. All new developments participate in establishing parks through the payment of park fees at the time of permitting. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed Plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for the looping of utilities and interconnectivity of streets as supported in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision will provide. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; 7 The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low-density residential development. Low-density residential development is described as 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Plan encourages the promotion of a variety of residential densities and suggests the community should support the advancement of programs encouraging home ownership. The Transportation Element of the Plan suggests major streets should be beautified with trees and landscaping. In this case there are no major streets requiring improvements. The Plan also encourages the interconnection of local streets for inter -neighborhood travel for public safety as well as providing for traffic disbursement. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e.: school impact fees are paid.) (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. The proposed Plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to insure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this plat. These factors will insure the public use and interest are served. TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The interior street through the plat connecting Road 72 to Wernett Road shall be a continuous through street with no cul de sacs. 8 4. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10 -foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 5. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". The following Benton Franklin Health District Note Shall be placed on the face of the Final Plat "This plat appears to have suitable conditions for the use of on-site sewage disposal systems. However, because of the nature of the testing methods used, we have no way of determining whether each lot can comply with Benton -Franklin District Board of Health Rules and Regulations at the time of permit issuance. Further be advised Benton Franklin Health District approval of any lot within this plat for the use of on-site sewage disposal systems may be contingent upon that lot passing additional soil inspections/ percolation tests, and/or other requirements at a later date. On-site sewage disposal systems installed within this plat may require systems meeting a minimum of Treatment Level C in accordance with Benton Franklin District Board of Health Rules and Regulations No. 2. Contact BFHD for more information." 6. All lots with the plat must meet lot size requirements set forth by the Benton Franklin Health District Board of Health Rules and Regulations # 2. 7. All 100' sanitary control zones shall be shown on the final plat for surrounding wells. 8. Driveway access to Lot 1 shall be located on Wernett Road at the westerly edge of the Lot or as otherwise determined by Franklin County. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the March 16, 2017 staff report. M=ON: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Volterra Estates, with conditions as listed in the March 16, 2017 staff report. 0 10 1 TIP a s • �_ ISA akq � •fY 'Y f e s bkall T 9 wr ALM MI, �41 — T Il aii� �I7I7i� DTl7 X114 1 Im f IN 81Ci a��'"" P M i M a•� 1 ■ AM C� W ,`.� .�. �.�� i. —A ' 1 } s°. 4 C.i r I i, Mk REPORT TO PLANNING MASTER FILE NO: PP 2017-002 APPLICANT: Ron Asmus Homes, Inc. HEARING DATE: 3/16/2017 2810 W. Clearwater Ave ACTION DATE: 4/20/2017 Suite 102 Kennewick, WA 99336 BACKGROUND REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Chiawana Heights, 80 -Lots 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 3 of Record Survey 1847849 General Location: 4200 Block of Road 84. Property Size: 21.44 Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 80 single-family lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 7,215 W to 12,354 ft2 Average Lot Square Footage: 8,205 ft2 2. ACCESS: The property will have access from Road 84 and a future north south road to the east. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water service is located in Road 84 and sewer service is located in Galway Lane to the west and along the eastern edge of the proposed plat. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (low -Density Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-1 - Single -Family SOUTH: R-1 - Vacant (Future school site)) EAST: R-1 - Single -Family WEST R-1 - Single -Family S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for low-density residential development. According to the Comprehensive Plan, low-density residential development means 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future land use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. I1, page 17) encourages development of lands designated for low-density residential uses when or where: sewer is available, the location is suitable for home sites, and there is a market demand for new home sites Policy H -1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of 1 the community. Goal LU -2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non - Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11-355). ANALYSIS The project site is located immediately east of Road 84 north of the FCID irrigation canal on the former DNR property. In 2013 the DNR was directed by the State legislature to work with the City of Pasco to rezone all of the DNR property south of I-182 based on a refinement of the City's land use map contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan has called for the property in question to be developed with low-density single- family homes since 1982. The property was zoned R-1 in 2014 and sold to developers last year. Chiawana Heights is the first of several plats that will be proposed for former DNR property. The proposed plat is consistent with both the zoning regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed Plat contains 80 residential lots. The lots vary in size from 7,215 square feet to 12,354 square feet. The proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the R-1 zoning on the site. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets which will be dedicated. UTILITIES: Municipal water and irrigation lines are located in Road 84. Sewer lines are located to the west in Galway Lane and along the eastern edge of the proposed plat. The developer will be responsible for extending utilities into the Plat. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontages of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not diminish the buildable area of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire N hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of less than 300 feet on residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets. The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street. STREET NAMES: All streets will be named prior to approval of final plats. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines as a part of the infrastructure improvements. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/ developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact": Prevent Overcrowding: Density requirements of the R-1 zone are designed to address overcrowding concerns. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property in question be developed with 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Plat has a density of approximately 3.7 units per acre. No more than 40 percent of each lot is permitted to be covered with structures per the R-1 standards. Parks Opens Space/Schools: The nearest City Park is located half a mile to the west in the Loviisa Farms neighborhood. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new dwelling unit at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The Plat is laid out for single- family development as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density permitted under the Comprehensive Plan is 5 dwelling units per acre. 3 The developer is proposing a density of 3.7 units per acre. The proposed development will include improvements to Road 84. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to current City standards and to the standards of the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of all intersection will be installed with the construction of the road improvements. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the Plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This Preliminary Plat contains 80 residential building lots, providing an opportunity for the construction of 80 new dwelling units in Pasco. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitations, building height restrictions and building setbacks will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The streets through and adjoining the Plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by Road 84Road and Broadmoor Boulevard. The Preliminary Plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review. (The discussion under "Safe Travel" above applies to this section also.) Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates the Plat site for low-density residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings: • The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. • The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within the Urban Growth Boundaries. • The site slopes slightly to the south. • The site is currently vacant and no longer being farmed. • The site is not considered a critical area, a mineral resource area or a wet land. 4 • The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for low-density residential development. • Low-density residential development is described in the Comprehensive Plan as two to five dwelling units per acre. • The site is zoned R-1 (Low -Density Residential). • The site was zoned R-1 in cooperation with the DNR in 2014. • The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the advancement of programs that promote home ownership and development of a variety of residential densities and housing types. • The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the interconnection of neighborhood streets to provide for the disbursement of traffic. • The interconnection of neighborhood streets is necessary for utility connections (looping) and the provision of emergency services. • Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 800 vehicle trips per day. • The current traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the I-182 Corridor when warranted. • The current park impact fee is $1,432 per dwelling unit. The fee can be reduced by 58 percent if a developer dedicates a five acre park site to the City. The dedication of a fully constructed park reduces the fee by 93 percent. • RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved. • The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012. • Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools. • Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses. Except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements. 5 • All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. • All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. • The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner that does not injure, annoy or endanger the comfort and repose of other property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including houses. • Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to Franklin County PUD, the 0 Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable and Ben -Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110.City parks are located in the subdivisions to the west of the site. All new developments participate in establishing parks through the payment of park fees at the time of permitting. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed Plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for the looping of utilities and interconnectivity of streets as supported in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision will provide arterial street improvements along Road 84. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low-density residential development. Low-density residential development is described as 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Plan encourages the promotion of a variety of residential densities and suggests the community should support the advancement of programs encouraging home ownership. The Transportation Element of the Plan suggests major streets should be beautified with trees and landscaping. The Plan also encourages the interconnection of local streets for inter -neighborhood travel for public safety as well as providing for traffic disbursement. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the 7 subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e.: school impact fees are paid.) (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. The proposed Plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to insure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will insure the public use and interest are served. TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The developer shall install a common "Estate Type" fence six -feet in height along the west line of the plat as a part of the infrastructure improvements associated with the plat. The fence must be constructed of masonry block. A fencing detail must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. Consideration must be given to a reasonable vision triangle at the intersection of streets. The City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep. These fencing requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the final plat(s). A concrete mow strip shall be installed under any common fence as directed by the City Parks Division and shall be approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. 4. A common solid fence must be installed along the southern boundary of the proposed plat adjacent to the school site. (A common solid fence means a cedar, vinyl, or block fence across the south line of all lots abutting the school property. The fence must be installed before or during construction of each home.) 5. Excess right-of-way along Road 84 must be landscaped to match the landscaping on the west side of Road 84. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. 6. The developer/ builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $475 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. The City shall not accept maintenance s responsibility for the landscaping abutting said streets until such time as all fees are collected for each phase that abut said streets. 7. Lots abutting Road 84 shall not have direct access to Road 84. Access shall be prohibited by means of deed restrictions or statements on the face of the final plat(s). 8. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10 -foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 9. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and set April 20, 2017 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. 9 717 -�"T ffP 77L WWI: r yj I 717 -�"T ffP 77L ,tom//, i 0 s P al 3 t-.— or0a �•, � I rl�§ I p u,—fll—b` a am 3 oYoa k 3 OYOa ab q cp 1q I p sb eb gp c S ao, qft aft .b b ar —tee— —1W— _tea—. _.tT__�__�•� Laa 9n .b .,e n n .w ae SC " �53�jPG56 $$F Y $ §R m paka Rb " ab tol Mg"'@@•�$ 9 WX 91 oil b�8 x IS i iy''3 nk �'� 1,12- k �. w eH' k S• nl9 y o 33�'ga-f3WY� E�x • Pp .b Z1�5.4c 6 `g.. w8$ __—___—_—__F_—___— _—_ _ 1_—___— @i •w, T 4 's bB oYOa LL ` N IU/I S: A >� aDai oQF_________________-� — RR �� yp e':Rs •`• �w-6„— _______________.__ Z ae aroa r— -------- s P al 3 t-.— or0a �•, � I rl�§ I p u,—fll—b` a am 3 oYoa k 3 OYOa ab q cp 1q I p sb eb gp c S ao, qft aft .b b ar —tee— —1W— _tea—. _.tT__�__�•� Laa 9n .b .,e n n .w ae SC " �53�jPG56 $$F Y $ §R m paka Rb " ab tol Mg"'@@•�$ 9 WX 91 oil b�8 x IS i iy''3 nk �'� 1,12- k �. w eH' k S• nl9 y o 33�'ga-f3WY� E�x • Pp .b Z1�5.4c 6 `g.. w8$ __—___—_—__F_—___— _—_ _ 1_—___— @i •w, T 4 's bB oYOa LL ` N IU/I S: A >� aDai oQF_________________-� — w. �w-6„— _______________.__ Z ae aroa r— -------- ----- R----- Q >� NUY aIftst w IS ¢FAC' W ,wRb I ,,all I Q §® s §��..�'.. � .:�8 ., ° §C s §� a §x •� I I s P al 3 t-.— or0a �•, � I rl�§ I p u,—fll—b` a am 3 oYoa k 3 OYOa ab q cp 1q I p sb eb gp c S ao, qft aft .b b ar —tee— —1W— _tea—. _.tT__�__�•� Laa 9n .b .,e n n .w ae SC " �53�jPG56 $$F Y $ §R m paka Rb " ab tol Mg"'@@•�$ 9 WX 91 oil b�8 x IS i iy''3 nk �'� 1,12- k �. w eH' k S• nl9 y o 33�'ga-f3WY� E�x • Pp .b Z1�5.4c 6 `g.. w8$ __—___—_—__F_—___— _—_ _ 1_—___— @i •w, T 4 's bB oYOa J _ 2 "/� '; y r.{ I \ �.� i r.: 1 �' l - ..,:r 1 rC� -yin � V,fi All 141111' 1 Y! REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2017-004 HEARING DATE: 03/16/2017 ACTION DATE: 04/20/2017 APPLICANT: Maria E. Segura 1901 S. Dilley Ave Moses Lake, WA 98837 REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Beauty School in a C-3 Zone (2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite E) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Leal: That Portion of the West '/2 of the Northeast '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Southeast '/4 of Section 25, Township 29, Range 9 as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of said subdivision, thence S 89 D20' W along the north line of said subdivision 165'; Thence SOOD26'W parallel with the east line of said subdivision 246.92'; Thence N89D20'E parallel with the north line of said subdivision 165' to a point on the east line of said subdivision; thence NOOD26'E along the east line of said subdivision 246.92' to the Point of Beginning (Parcel # 119 461 100). General Location: 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite E Property Size: 35,785 square feet (.82 acres) 2. ACCESS: Access to the site is available from W. Sylvester Street 3. UTILITIES: The property is served by utilities located in Sylvester Street. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-3 (General Business). Surrounding properties are zoned C-1, C-3 and R-4 and are fully developed. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 - Commercial SOUTH: C-3 - Storage EAST: R-4 - Apartments WEST: R-4 - Apartments 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial development. Goal CF -5 suggests adequate provisions should be made for educational facilities located throughout the urban growth area. Policy CF -S-A encourages the appropriate location and design of schools throughout the community. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non -Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11- 355). DISCUSSION Applicant is proposing to establish a Beauty School in a commercial retail mall located at 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite E. The location is in a C-3 (General Business) zoning district. There is not specific zoning for beauty schools; however the code does make provision for schools/ educational facilities in the community through the special permit process. Beauty schools have been permitted within the City in the past and licensed as private schools. Clare's Beauty College for example was located at the northwest corner of 41h Avenue and Lewis Street in the downtown area. Lupita's Beauty Salon recently received a Special Permit to operate at 915 West Court Street. The beauty school will be new to the area. Training will be provided for two students at a time. Suite E contains 940 square feet of floor area. Beauty schools require one parking space for each 300 square of floor area. As such, the proposed facility would require 4 parking stalls. This commercial mall has 48 spaces which are shared between 6 suites, thus providing 8 shared spaces per unit. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report and comments made at the public hearing. The Planning Commission may add additional findings as deemed appropriate. 1. Applicant is proposing a Beauty School at 2508 W Sylvester St. #E. 2. The location is in a C-3 zone. 3. Schools/ educational facilities require special permits regardless of the zoning. 2 4. Beauty schools have been permitted within the City in the past and licensed as private schools, including a recent one at 915 W. Court Street, 5. Training will be provided for two students at a time. 6. Suite E contains 940 square feet of floor area. 7. Beauty schools require one parking space for each 300 square of floor area; the proposed facility would require 4 parking stalls. 8. This 6 -suite mall provides 8 shared spaces per unit and 48 parking spaces overall. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must draw its conclusion from the findings of fact based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria and staff listed conclusions are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The proposed use is supported by Plan goals CF -5 which suggests adequate provisions be made for educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? Public streets and utilities are in place to serve the property. Demands on infrastructure will not change with the addition of the beauty school component to the proposed Beauty Salon. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The proposed Beauty Salon will operate in a commercial mall containing six 900+ square -foot suites and 48 parking spaces. Only four parking spaces are required for the proposed use. Parking is more than adequate for the proposed use. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? 3 The height and foot print of the conversion to the Learning Center. the proposed use. building will not change with the Parking is more than adequate for 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Nothing will change on the site to cause noise dust and other activities that would be objectionable to neighboring properties. The property will operate as a beauty salon with a training component. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? A beauty salon will not create a public health and safety concern. The addition of two students within the beauty salon would not create a new health and safety concerns for the neighborhood. Proposed Approval Conditions 1. The special permit shall apply to Parcel #119 461 100. 2. The special permit shall be null and void if all necessary licenses have not been obtained by March 1, 2018. MOTION: I move to close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact, and development of a recommendation for City Council for the April 20, 2017 Planning Commission meeting. El e W O ZN � 3 VO N W M � ' U 3Ab-H1bZ E ct D Q U. Q O iii U C/1 Ct N ct a� Lu a6e.101S cn -iuiw Co �° c s}uaw:pedb ct N +j a 3AV H19Z N cn .� 2 UL Cl) cn C� V3AV H1LZ ,� lepiewwoo Wi Z y ; � 3 O IIIIHM N �� r 3Ab'-H1tiZ Ct O U c rct H UcncuV �o ct 3AV H19Z N Lu U . M Tom V � � '^" C� 0 N and H1LZ �? V IMME I V ---- - i �. I� -:� A REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2017-005 APPLICANT: Jacob Huston HEARING DATE: 3/16/2017 1125 Road 44 ACTION DATE: 4/20/2017 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Detached garage height increase in an RS -12 (Suburban) Zone 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 11 Arlene's Addition General Location: 1125 Road 44 Property Size: 34,064 sq. ft. 2. ACCESS: The site is accessible from Road 44. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal utilities currently do not serve the site. Water from the FCID irrigation canal is currently available to the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned RS -12 (Suburban) and contains a single family residence a well house and a shed. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: RS -12 - Single -Family Residence SOUTH: RS -12 - Single-Family/School Track Field EAST: RS -12 - Single -Family Residence WEST: RS -12 - Single -Family Residence 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Low -Density Residential uses. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. An environmental determination will be made after the public hearing for this project. A Determination of Non -Significance or Mitigated Determination of Non -Significance is likely for this application (WAC 197-11- 355). ANALYSIS The applicant has applied to construct a detached residential garage in excess of the height of his house. Pursuant to PMC 25.22.030(1), detached residential garages in RS -12 zones are permitted to be up to 18 feet in height but are not to be taller than the house. In this case the proposed shop is slightly taller than the house. In 2013 the zoning regulations were amended to allow for I special permit review of shops and garages that may be taller than the height specified in the code. In this case the applicant is proposing to construct a 17' 9" garage, just under the 18 foot limitation for the RS -12 zone, but 1'9" taller than the house on the lot. The maximum allowable height for a house in an RS -12 zone is 35 feet. The applicant's house is 16 feet tall and as a result the garage should be 16 feet tall unless an increase in height is granted through the special permit process. The existing shop/shop will be removed and replaced by the proposed 30' by 40' garage. The new garage will be located 125 feet east of Road 44 about 47 feet from the existing house. The nearest side property line will be 22 feet to the north. The garage will also be setback 131 feet from the rear property line and 63 feet from the south property line. Minimum setbacks permitted the garage to be located 25 feet from the front property line and 10 feet from any side property line. The generous setbacks proposed for the garage will ameliorate the minor height difference between the house and the garage. For example with the garage being locate 125 feet from Road 44 and 47 feet behind the house the angle of sight over those distance will cause the garage to appear about the same height as the house. Additionally the row of trees in front of the house and to the rear of the house will also reduce the visual impacts of the height of the garage. The yard directly to the north of the proposed garage also has a row of pine trees separating the two properties. The existence of larger than normal setbacks, surrounding pine trees and location of the Tri City junior Academy track all are contributing factors that will amelioration of the minor height increase of the proposed garage. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The parcel contains just over three quarters of an acre. 2. The site is zoned RS -12 (Suburban). 3. The site fronts Road 44. 4 4. The proposed garage will be located 125 feet from Road 44, 22 feet from the north property line, 62 feet from the south property line and 131 feet from the rear property line. 5. Pursuant to PMC § 25.22.030(1) the maximum height of detached structures in the RS -12 zone is eighteen (18) feet. 6. Pursuant to PMC § 25.22.030(1) detached shops and garages exceeding eighteen (18) feet in height may be approved by special permit. 7. The shop is proposed to be 1'9" feet taller than the house measured from peak to peak. 8. The maximum dwelling height of the RS -12 zone is 35 feet. 9. The site is relatively flat and generally matches the elevation of Road 44. 10. The RS -12 zone requires minimum side and rear yard setbacks of ten (10) feet each. 11. A row of trees in front of the house and to the rear of the house reduces the visual impacts of the height of the proposed garage from Road 44 and some properties to the south. 12. The yard directly to the north of the proposed garage has a row of pine trees visually screening the applicant's property from the property to the north. 13. The Tri City Junior Academy running tack and sports field is located to the south of the applicant's property. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Though the Plan does not specifically address detached residential shops and garages, Plan Policy H -4-A encourages innovative techniques in the design of residential neighborhoods to provide character and variety in the community. The availability of the special permit review process to increase shop and garage heights is a new zoning provision aimed at providing a location specific evaluation of such requests. No aspect of the application conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? 3 Permitting an increase in garage height by 1'9' will have no impact on public infrastructure. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The RS -12 District provides for low density residential environments permitting single-family homes and accessory structure on large suburban lots. The applicant's immediate neighborhood area contains 12,000 square foot lots and a private school sports field. Residents in this part of the community commonly request building permits for large detached shops and garages. Most recently a shop was built directly south of the applicant's property. The proposed garage will be sited constructed and maintained in general harmony with the character of the neighborhood. The proposed garage will be built with exterior finishes and roofing to match the details on the applicant's home. These design standards will cause the garage to be built in harmony with the existing character of the neighborhood. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof The proposed structure will be 17 feet lower than the maximum structure height for the neighborhood. RS -12 zone allows homes to be constructed up to thirty five (35) feet tall measured at the roof mid -point. The 35 -foot height limit to the mid -point of the roof could very well result in a home which is forty (40) feet tall measured at the peak. There are a number of detached shops or garages in the neighborhood. The shop located on the lot to the east of the applicant's has a shop/garage that exceeds the height of the dwelling on the lot. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? It is unlikely that there will be any difference in terms of use between a garage that is 16 feet tall verses a 17' 9" tall garage. Staff sees no reason why structure height would increase the potential for objectionable effects such as noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic or flashing lights. The use of the site will remain low-density single-family residential. El (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Requirements of the International Building Code will ensure the garage will be built to conform to all public health or safety standards. The building code standards coupled with setback requirements will ensure the garage will not be a nuisance to the neighborhood. SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS BY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR SHOPS/GARAGES. In addition to making and entering conclusions from the record for special permits based on the criteria in 25.86.060 the Planning Commission shall consider the following for special permits dealing with increased heights for detached shops and garages: (1) Will the shop/garage match the principle structure in design and exterior treatments such as roofing materials, siding, color, window and door openings, eave overhangs, fenestrations and other architectural features? Residential detached shops and garages are required to be compatible and consistent with the house on the lot. That means either the garage needs to have similar siding and roofing materials matching the home or in the case of pole buildings eave overhangs are required along with colors that are similar to the house. As a condition of approval the Planning Commission could require additional architectural features to help offset the additional height. (2) Will the existing topography and elevation of the site and surrounding property exacerbate or attenuate the height of the proposed shop/garage? The site is relatively flat and more or less level with the grade of Road 44. There are no features on the site that would tend to exacerbate the proposed height of the garage. (3) Will the proposal include landscaping features or berms to ameliorate the height of the shop/garage? There are no landscaping features indicated on the proposed site plan however, the existing trees on the lot will screen the proposed garage from the west and south west. The neighboring property to the north also has a row of pine trees along the property line separating the applicant's property from the neighboring property. 5 (4) Will the shop/garage be erected on the property utilizing minimum setbacks? Based on the site plan (Exhibit `1') the garage placement will substantially exceed all minimum setbacks for the RS -12 zone. The garage will setback 125 feet from Road 44, 22 feet from the north property line, 63 feet from the south property line and 131 feet from the rear property line. (5) Is the site larger than the minimum lot size requirement for the zoning district? The RS -12 zone requires parcels be a minimum of 12,000 square feet. The site is 34,064 square feet; over twice the minimum area. Larger lots allow for the provision of greater setbacks. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. The special permit shall apply to Franklin County tax parcel # 119502206, addressed 1124 Road 44; 2. The garage must be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan submitted with this special permit application: 3. The garage shall not exceed 17.10 feet in height as measured at the peak of the roof; 4. The special shall be null and void if a building permit has not been obtained by June 30, 2017. MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed special permit application and set April 20, 2017 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. 2 Ft • rl � o:., .v-�� � iii —'d5, � V/ vrl E � � atF?, (-, ` t(4 w' i•� � �1 JIG Yi;F yZE � � •$i:_. .y � �4: tti • I .y �" O ti� I is •y St 4 W Id 1S6t, Z N � 0 L Val Z17 aeon zt, ad0tl W cn D LL U) } Z O ULU = � O Q ' L LLJO O � O tCIA , C U umLLO g Cl) UO C� 9b OVMJ W -ld 1S6t, Z H 3 N zt, G.. zt, aeon W � N r cn a� } x z O U = � O Q x O a bb Gvo2l Ct O � ct O U � C7 � U F- N U) N U U) r N W Cj < OC o N� 9� ab'02� C ��,: �: �. dt '� _ `p - - - �; .e �. '- , {{ryy�s Y i { p,. �: F. �. -- ��j .i�:� s. F=T ���� � I LU i5zi W dy GJ5 22� G3` LU gas q7 II i i MEMORANDUM DATE: March 9, 2017 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator SUBJECT: 2016 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PLAN EVALUATION REPORT (MF# BGAP2017-001) Overview The overall goal of the City of Pasco's Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) and the Tri -Cities HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) is to develop a strong community with the provision of decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities. The 2016 Annual Action Plan represents the first year of the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan and summarizes the activities that were planned for the period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 to meet community development and housing needs identified in the five-year Consolidated Plan. The Annual Action Plan provides specific details of investments in activities, describes the geographic area in which the programs are available and the nature of the impact the City hopes to achieve through the programs. The City of Pasco certifies it is following a current HUD -approved Consolidated Plan, and has pursued all resources that were proposed in the Plan. It has fairly and impartially provided requested certifications of consistency as specified in the Plan, and has not hindered implementation of the Consolidated Plan. HUD's Community Development Block Grant regulations require Grantees to submit a "Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report" (CAPER) to HUD within 90 days of the close of a Grantee's Program Year (December 31, 2016). This requirement, set forth in 24 CFR Part 91, reports to HUD and informs the community of Pasco's performance in meeting the goals of the Annual Action Plan. As a recipient of these funds, the City of Pasco hereby submits, its final Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) which provides detailed information to the local public, HUD, and members of Congress on activities undertaken with these entitlement funds. The CAPER also reports on the City of Pasco's performance in meeting the goals established in the 2016 Annual Action Plan, for this first year of the 2015-2019 Five -Year Consolidated Plan. Source of Funds The City received an annual entitlement of $670,436 directly from HUD. The City of Pasco estimated CDBG resources available for community development activities in the 2016 Annual Action Plan would total $665,000. Activities budgeted for in the 2016 Annual Action Plan and approved by City Council Resolution 3658 in September 201 totaled $665,000. The 2016 Annual Action Plan submitted to HUD totaled $670,436. Additional funds received ($5,436) were allocated to the Pasco Specialty Kitchen Fagade Improvement contingency project. Use of Funds Activities funded for program year 2016 activities totaled $670,436 and expenditures drawn for 2016 activities totaled $296,582. Prior year activities utilized $217,736 for a total of $514,318 in CDBG funds drawn in 2016. Public Service activities totaled $94,840 or 13%, and Planning and Administration obligations were $109,514 or 16%. CDBG funds leveraged $354,235 in private/public funds for projects completed this program year Assessment of Goals and Objectives Activities funded by the City of Pasco during 2016 addressed the priorities established in the Tri -Cities 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan, drawn from an analysis of the needs and resources identified through the planning process. The goals and strategies are designed to provide a framework for action in undertaking housing and community development activities over the five year period. Overall the City substantially meets the goals and objectives of the Consolidated Plan. Goal 1 — Increase and Preserve Affordable Housing Choices Three (3) Affordable housing activities utilized $48,000 in 2016 funds for code enforcement resulting in 1294 notices of civil violations closed (259%) Prior year activities utilized $1,367 for rehabilitation activities funded in 2014 that are currently in process and expected to be completed in 2017. (0%) Goal 2 — Community Neighborhood & Economic Development Four (4) Economic development activities utilized $56,208 in 2016 funds. The Pasco Specialty Kitchen technical assistance program used $55,000 which created 10 FTE jobs, assisted 5 new and 3 existing businesses, and directly benefited 17 people. Pasco Specialty Kitchen facility improvement projects utilized $8,348.10. (420/.) Three (3) Public Facility & Infrastructure Improvements activities funded in 2016 did not draw funds this program year. 0% Prior year activities completed in 2016 utilized $211,334. (85%) Public Facility improvements often cover more than one year to procure and complete, the period of performance for construction projects is set for one year from the contract signing date. 2016 Public Facility construction projects will be completed by the end of 2017 except for Peanuts Park, which is a multi-year project expected to be completed in 2018. Goal 3 — Homeless Interventions and Public Services Four (4) Public Service activities funded in 2016 utilized $90,000 and for the benefit of 72,793 people in two low -moderate areas. Prior year activities utilized $4,840 for the benefit of 35 students. The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. MOTION: I move the Planning Commission close the public hearing and recommend the City Manager approve the 2016 Consolidated Annual Plan Evaluation Report as presented. Attachments: 1. 2016 CAPER CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL 1911: �� @l9 ►; March 31, 2017 CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) Table of Contents CR -05 - Goals and Outcomes....................................................................................................................3 CR -15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)......................................................................................... 8 CR -20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)......................................................................................................9 CR -25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) ................................11 CR -30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(1)...........................................................................................13 CR -35 - Other Actions 91.220(1)-(k); 91.320(i)-(J)....................................................................................15 CR -40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230...................................................................................................20 CR -45 - CDBG 91.520(c)..........................................................................................................................21 CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) CR -05 - Goals and Outcomes Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year. The City of Pasco conducted activities during the 2016 program year to increase and preserve affordable housing choices, support community, neighborhood, and economic development efforts, and support homeless intervention and public service activities . The City managed or implemented each activity in a manner consistent with the certifications presented in the PY2016 Annual Action Plan, including: Affirmatively furthering fair housing; Following an anti -displacement and relocation plan; Providing a drug-free workplace; Ensuring no federal funds were used for lobbying; and Implementing activities that are consistent with all components of the 5 -Year Consolidated Plan. Activities were consistent with the goals and objectives of the 2016 Annual Action Plan. All but two proiects funded have been completed, with each proiect fulfilling a HUD National Objective It is anticipated that the remaining open projects will be completed and closed during the 2017-2018 program years. The Fagade Improvement is designed to provide forgivable loans to local businesses. The City has noted challenges in finding businesses that are willing to undertake the requirements of the program. This has caused an initial delay in realized outcomes. The City anticipates a new program structure, expansion of the program boundaries, and revised policies will result in actualization of the proposed goals as well as long-term sustainability of the program. The Housing Rehabilitation Program provides grants to very low-income households. The City has noted challenges in finding homeowners that are willing to undertake the requirements of the program. The homes that received financial assistance for significant repairs required larger grant amounts allocated to each household, resulting in fewer households assisted than initially projected. The City has begun looking into ways to provide smaller and less costly repairs and partner with local non -profits for home repairs not eligible under the program. The City anticipates that a new program structure, targeted program boundaries, and revised policies will result in actualization of proposed goals. The Kurtzman Park Playground Improvment projects scheduled was completion in 2016, Pasco Specialty Kitchen Facade Improvement #347 funded in 2015, was cancelled and reallocated to #356 and carreid over for completion in 2017. Other PY2016 proiects well exceeded proposed goals In general the needs of low-income Pasco residents are in excess of the limited availability of funds. A change in account methods for area benefit proiects has resulted in a larger number of beneficiaries than initially estimated Goals and outcomes related to each CDBG project are included in Table 1. CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015( v c m u c 1O m a w M Y +' m of O N H � O E u 0 w O L � � Y N 0 N O cn u N a � v E O m 4) Y GOO O O O N -O O m G) m m0to T E n E E m 0 to m O tl4 > O u r- u a Y O w t d � m E w m O 0 m Y t N a0+ ° o 0 c U 3 E �0+ Y m 4O V m O w V 7 w 0 O > O to m a) c w CL r ` 0 3 = 0 w a a ai v � - m w m > c m a y 0 h w o.� sono E n w u u 0 u oo w d 4 E n o 0 E m m 0 a d` i vOi o �n w E CL m o `m N n W a I a` a N nvi d \ \G 2 m E o o N a u m to uo to V I w A M O Q H 6 M N 00 v u a a d c ID N o O W R OM I N 6 V M M N w d N O yNj N "O = to O O N V1 VI N y 6 a m O N O O c C C co a 2 S a; w y C N C O U w O > O w H 'a+ Y u C ',,, Y « 0 °, 3 c v,�-,, �° cu • O w O m t+ C a\+ ` in w LL U/ to UI N OO N L' m E v E c u w C V ` w m N 3= yC v O j O C O _ d O— LL �+ S] co S W d \ L LD u 3 O C7 N l7 N V' N C7 N C7 v N S E co o m a o v o v o a .On v v* v .n u .n u .n c c �. v to a 0 3 o, 0. o, a o, o- o �- c 0 E o = E o = E o = E o = E o w c E> c E> c E> c E> c E> Z 0 Z Z V u u a u a Z u M Z u 0 "O U 'O V > °o E > °o E c > °o E c > o° E > $ .� L c ac E L c E L E Y E Y L 0 c 3 O O a c 0 O O O. c c 3 O O O. c= c O O O O. c O O O E d E r w O E L v E s u@0 E r E r v 0 70@ SP wu v ZO 0 'w c w o 'N c W 0 Z c N 0 'N c w O Z c w (7 u c m -O u c m M u c m M u c m 'O u c Ma M a u > 0 O O ^ 00 vi o0 N e'i N M ^ 01 N N ^ H V) � O N O Lo a° ^ ^ o v o M LDN N I� O O O O O V O c-I ti O a a c v ° N N 0 v c > ] Y 0 y c > > Y d¢ x x x x D Y W p u Y m 3 c N O vi Z c ° w L x w a t O a o C c V ° a c m 3 °w E L 2 N ° u N ° N Y U N U m E Y c ` �O O 2 w a m 00 D m W O tn m W U N N N z E C E N d s bD O 3 d n � on O Q 2 z x vai Q x x c a a N CM H O) y > Ev a >„ 2 C t0 vOi N C N 09 Cv m o O O. N N N p N N Z N C O N p Assess how the jurisdiction's use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified. The goals and strategies are designed to provide a framework for action in undertaking housing and community development activities over the five year period. Goals describe priority areas for overall improvement in Pasco. Strategies describe the general methods that the entitlement communities will employ to positively impact living and working conditions. Objectives detail the specifics of the strategies, the tools that will be used to implement the strategies, populations and areas that will be targeted, and performance indicators to track progress in meeting the goals. Due to HUD's recent monitoring, new policies and practices related to public services and public facilities have been implemented by the City of Pasco. As a result of these changes in policies and procedures, achievements and goals will be documented, tracked, and monitored more efficiently. The City feels that these changes result in more accurate reporting in line with HUD's guidance. Activities funded by the City of Pasco during the 2016 program year addressed the priorities established in the Tri -Cities 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan, which were drawn from an analysis of the needs and resources identified through the planning process. CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) CR -10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted). 91.520(a) Table 2 —Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds Narrative Pasco is a very diverse jurisdiction and approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of funds support racial and ethnic minorities. Funds primarily support low -moderate income residents and households (99%) with almost forty-two percent (42%) positioned in the extremely low -Income bracket thirty-two percent (32%) positioned in the very low -Income bracket and nineteen (19%) positioned in the low -moderate Income bracket. The information reported on people and households is the sum of information reported by each PY2016 funded project. CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 7 CDBG White 1,211 Black or African American 11 Asian g American Indian or American Native 3 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 1 Total 1,234 Hispanic 359 Not Hispanic 975 Table 2 —Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds Narrative Pasco is a very diverse jurisdiction and approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of funds support racial and ethnic minorities. Funds primarily support low -moderate income residents and households (99%) with almost forty-two percent (42%) positioned in the extremely low -Income bracket thirty-two percent (32%) positioned in the very low -Income bracket and nineteen (19%) positioned in the low -moderate Income bracket. The information reported on people and households is the sum of information reported by each PY2016 funded project. CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 7 CR -15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a) Identify the resources made available Source of Funds Source Resources Made Available Amount Expended During Program Year CDBG 11,995,309 1 514,318 fable 3 —Resources Made Available Narrative Program year 2016 activities utilized CDBG funds $296,582.00 and prior year activities utilized $217,736.41 for total funds used $514,318.41. Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Target Area Planned Percentage of Actual Percentage of Allocation Allocation Narrative Description fable 4 — Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments Narrative CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) Leveraging Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the needs identified in the plan. CDBG funds leveraged additional federal, state and local funding resources to support affordable housing, community and economic development, and Homelessness Prevention/Non-Homeless Special Needs projects. Total resources from other funding sources totaled over $354,235.44. Private investments were also encouraged in economic development and affordable housing projects. CR -20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b) Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income, moderate -income, and middle-income persons served. Table 5 — Number of Households One -Year Goal Actual Number of homeless households to be provided affordable housing units Number of non -homeless households to be provided affordable housing units Number of special -needs households to be provided affordable housing units Total Table 5 — Number of Households Table 6 — Number of Households Supported Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals. Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans. Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income persons CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) One -Year Goal Actual Number of households supported through rental assistance Number of households supported through the production of new units Number of households supported through the rehab of existing units Number of households supported through the acquisition of existing units Total Table 6 — Number of Households Supported Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals. Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans. Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income persons CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity. Number of Persons Served CDBG Actual HOME Actual Extremely Low-income 0 0 Low-income 0 0 Moderate -income 0 0 Total 0 0 Table 7 — Number of Persons Served Narrative Information CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 10 CR -25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c) Evaluate the jurisdiction's progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending homelessness through: Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs The City of Pasco is committed to supporting various activities outlined in the Consolidated Plan to strengthen and coordinate actions with housing, non-profit and economic development agencies. Staff continues to be an active member of the Benton Franklin Housing Continuum of Care to assist in the coordination of government agencies, nonprofit organizations, housing developers, social service providers, and continuum of care providers to meet the needs of the homeless. The City of Pasco staff participates in annual the point in time count and serves on the Continuum of Care Board. Outside of these activities, the City did not reach out to any unsheltered homeless persons or assess their individual needs. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons In 2013, The City sold a HOME -assisted home to Benton Franklin Community Action Committee (CAC) which will used to house four individuals transitioning out of homelessness. CAC continues to provide supportive managed care and subsidized rent helping clients to achieve self-sufficiency. The City will continue to seek funding sources with which to continue providing assistance to non -profits for similar transitional housing projects. A housing unit is being sought which would house two families transitioning out of homelessness and temporarily house up to two dislocated families. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs CDBG funds were awarded to Elijah Family Homes for the Transition to Success program. The program provides housing and services to avoid homelessness from previous addiction related offenses. In 2015 Elijah Family Homes provided services to two families (4 adults and 6 children) in Pasco. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that lizam. OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 11 individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again Except for involvement with the Continuum of Care Group, the City did not provide assistance any low- income individuals or families avoid becoming homeless, that are being discharged from publicly funded institutions or receiving assistance from public or private agencies this program year. CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 12 CR -30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j) Actions taken to address the needs of public housing The City does not directly manage public housing. Public housing efforts are managed and implemented by the Housing Authority of Franklin County. To the furthest extent that it makes sense, the City works with the Housing Authority to analyze data to understand the public housing needs in Pasco. In the Tri -Cities, public housing authorities facilitate tenant councils in their respective jurisdictions. These public housing authorities actively support self-sufficiency for Section 8 and other program clients and actively market their assistance programs to private landlords and property management firms. As in most areas, public housing authority waiting lists in the Tri -Cities are unable to match the need for housing to the supply of vouchers or public housing units. Waiting lists are open year-round, with preferences and eligibility criteria established separately by each PHA as allowed by federal regulation. Pasco and Franklin County Housing Authority (PHA) has 348 units, 280 public housing units and 68 project based units. Senior/disabled housing units account for 165 units, and 183 Family. The public housing stock owned by the PHA is generally in very good overall condition. Regular improvements are generally made through their own funding as well as a variety of HUD Public Housing Grant Programs available for modernization, safety/security measures, rehabilitation and other operating issues. Public housing units range from scattered site, multi -family duplexes to multi -family apartment complexes. All rental properties in Pasco are required to be licensed annually and inspected bi-annually for compliance with minimum housing standards per the International Property Maintenance Code. Public Housing and Section 8 properties are inspected and certified by HUD inspectors and with properties inspected through the Rental Inspection Program. Through this program, many affordable rental units have been returned to the market, increasing the stock of safe, decent and affordable housing. In 2014, CDBG funds were used to develop infrastructure for the 4th and Pearl Housing Group Project which added 38 project -based units, 37 low-income households occupied the unitsin 2015. Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership The City funds several public services projects that provide training and education to low-income residents in regard to self-sufficiency, tenant rights, and homeownership options. The Pasco Day Labor Center is a project that provides such services and is funded with City General Funds. Centro Legal de la Raza and Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity are projects funded with CDBG. Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs CAPER CMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 13 CAPER 14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) CR -35 - Other Actions 91.220(j) -(k); 91.320(1)-(j) Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i) Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j) The need for affordable housing and community development and quality of life serves in order to assist low and moderate -income individuals, families and neighborhoods is tremendous. The greatest obstacle in meeting underserved needs is funding. While the City has programs in place to address the underserved needs, the amount of funding available for additional programs is insufficient to produce outcomes that ensure a full range of decent housing and suitable living environments. The City funds a number of CDBG activities that benefit its citizens by provided rehabilitation to homeowners through the Owner Occupied Rehabilitation program and accessibility modifications through the Volunteer Chore Services program. Additionally, the City funds community, economic, and neighborhood projects. Projects include improve neighborhood parks which enhance the livability of the neighborhood and the removal of architectural barriers that limit seniors and disabled from accessing City services. Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.3200) Non -homeless Special Needs The City of Pasco partners with and supports various housing efforts of local non-profit and public housing agencies with respect to supportive needs of non -homeless as opportunities arise. Many resources responding to the needs of the homeless and non -homeless are identified in local resource guidebooks for low-income and homeless persons. More community resources and services can be accessed by calling "2-1-1 Get Connected" and through internet connection at www.4people.org. The City of Pasco continued to support the efforts of various non-profit agencies, housing authorities and Community Housing Development Organizations to provide affordable housing opportunities for special needs populations. Priority is given by Benton Franklin CAC Energy Efficient Healthy House Program to those homes occupied by vulnerable populations, such as elderly or disabled homeowners and renters. City staff will be available to assist in identifying potential funding sources, provide technical assistance within staff capacity, and remain receptive to forming partnerships with other entities to assure vulnerable populations are able to reside in decent, safe housing. The Pasco Senior Center has numerous programs to serve the elderly and disabled, including a foot care CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 15 program, health screening and nutrition programs. Detox Center, which is located in Pasco, serves the Tri -City area and a number of other facilities providing specialized services to the non -homeless persons in need in the area of Benton and Franklin Counties. LaClinica, a medical, dental and housing clinic located in Pasco, provides an assortment of services to the elderly and low/mod income persons. CDBG and CHDO funding is offered to this organization on a regular basis covering a number of needs, primarily in the area of housing. Reduce the Incidence of Homelessness The City of Pasco continues to support the bi-county Housing Continuum of Care network responsible for implementing the 10 -Year Homeless Housing Plan to reduce homelessness by 50 percent within the next 10 years. Pasco will continue to be supportive of non-profit and housing agencies efforts to apply for McKinney-Vento, THOR, and other funding resources to assist homeless families and individuals with transitional and permanent and supportive housing. Specific HOPWA Objectives The City of Pasco does not receive HOWPA funds; however, the following information has been compiled and reported on by the Benton Franklin counties Department of Human Services through the bi-county Housing Continuum of Care Task Force. Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.3200) Applicants for the down -payment assistance program are provided with "Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home" pamphlet and "Renovate Right' is provided to all Homeowner Rehabilitation applicants. This benefits lower-income households that would qualify for housing programs. Information is also made available to the general public and contractors visiting city offices and via links on city websites. The City of Pasco will also continue to reduce the cost burden to lower income households by paying for extensive testing to identify lead hazards and assure compliance after remediation work. This will be accomplished by granting the costs of lead-based paint inspections, risk assessments, and one clearance exam for persons assisted by the Homeowner Rehabilitation Program using CDBG funds. Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty -level families. 91.220(k); 91.3200) Several activities were undertaken in 2016 to decrease cost -burdens for lower income people, such as the various housing programs offered by the City of Pasco and the Tri -Cities HOME Consortium including Down Payment Assistance Program, and various public/social service programs such as life skills training The City of Pasco actively supports economic development projects to create and retain jobs, provide CAPER 16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) education or training to enable people to become self-sufficient, and improve economic opportunity to work at living wage jobs. Activities in 2016 that addressed urgent priority community needs in the downtown business overlay district were provided through the Pasco Specialty Kitchen (a certified commercial kitchen incubator) providing technical assistance to microenterprise businesses the Facade Improvement Program to improve the appearance of downtown businesses and prosector installation for the Pasco High School Commercial Foods Academy, Culinary Arts class to employ all available expertise to improve economic conditions in Pasco. Address three urgent priority community needs in the downtown business overlay district through the Pasco Specialty Kitchen (a certified commercial kitchen incubator), the Facade Improvement Program will employ all its expertise to improve economic conditions in Pasco. Supported the efforts of various non-profit agencies, housing authorities and CHDO's to provide affordable housing opportunities for special needs populations. Rehabilitation priority is given by the by Benton Franklin CAC Energy Efficient Healthy House Program to those homes occupied by vulnerable populations, such as elderly or disabled homeowners and renters. Continued support for very low-income seniors and disabled households by reducing water bills. Discounts for electricity and refuse are also offered by Franklin Public Utility District (PUD) and Basin Disposal. Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.3200) The City of Pasco is committed to supporting various activities outlined in the Consolidated Plan to strengthen and coordinate actions with housing, non-profit and economic development agencies. Staff continues to be an active member of the Benton Franklin Housing Continuum of Care to assist in the coordination of government agencies, nonprofit organizations, housing developers, social service providers, and continuum of care providers to meet the needs of the homeless. The cities participate in cross -jurisdictional efforts. This includes participation in the Benton Franklin Continuum of Care, Benton Franklin Human Services Department, involvement with Housing Authorities, and continued efforts to foster cooperation among government agencies, nonprofit organizations, housing developers, social service providers, local businesses and continuum of care provides to meet the needs of the homeless. While the City of Richland is the lead entity, it relies heavily on the staff of the other two cities for support in the HOME program. One of the strengths of the Consortium is the close working relationship between the cities in general as well as between the departments charged with administering the HUD programs. In turn, agencies such as Benton Franklin Community Action Connections, TRIDEC, the Benton Franklin Continuum of Care, Benton Franklin Council of Governments, Housing Authorities and several CAPER 17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) nonprofit agencies work in all three cities, improving the effectiveness of coordination and efficiencies. The fact that the three cities are in close proximity, with common issues and opportunities, provides a base for cooperation. The Consortium also hold regular meetings to discuss improving internal policies, best practices and written agreements. Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 91.22O(k); 91.32O(j) City of Richland CDBG and Tri Cities Consortium staff coordinate with a variety of public and private housing and social service agencies during the planning, project proposal, and implementation stages of programs through the citizen participation process. Staff of the cities and representatives of nonprofit services and housing agencies participate on committees crossing jurisdictional lines. This includes involvement in the Continuum of Care planning efforts undertaken by Benton Franklin Human Services, a joint County agency, to oversee reducing homelessness in the counties. Richland continues to work with other community liaisons to encourage cooperation and sharing of information to identify existing resources that might be available to meet community needs. There is also a close working relationship with the Housing Authorities, some of whom have benefited from CDBG and/or HOME funds for assisted housing development activities and whose residents have benefitted from public services delivered by the area's nonprofit agencies. A limitation on cooperative efforts is the lack of new federal resources available for programs. Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.52O(a) The Fair Housing Act and the CDBG and HOME Program rules pertaining to non- discrimination follow a history in the United States' affirmation of various civil right of its citizenry. The core principles of fairness and anti -discrimination are rooted in the Constitution and its Amendments, and a series of milestone civil rights laws that have further honed the concept of fairness in governmental and private actions. These laws were made not only to govern the individual citizen's actions, but also to establish the same standards of fairness and accountability for governmental actions. The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing is a required document for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME entitlement jurisdictions. It has become the basis for identifying specific patterns of violation of the Fair Housing Act and other laws, civil rights rules and regulations which occur in a local jurisdiction. Once partners are identified, communities can design effective strategies and goals to address fair housing problems. The general content of this Analysis of Impediment to Fair Housing includes: CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 18 1. Identification of Fair Housing laws and rules. 2. A discussion of what constitutes fair housing violations and impediments. 3. Discussion of the fair housing complaint processes and investigation protocol. 4. An overview of the Tri -Cities demographic profiles including income, population attributes, economic conditions, and general housing market conditions. 5. Data from a variety of sources including local mortgage lending performance, complaint data, etc. 6. Review of local permitting and housing codes as well as housing program rules and practices, and local government practices which impact housing. 7. Identification of specific goals and actions to address identified impediments as well as ways to affirmatively further fair housing in the area. Pasco continues to expand and support activities that affirmatively further fair housing by implementing the recommended actions of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Plan. In 2016, the City of Pasco actively supported fair housing by partnering with local service providers to provide additional counseling for first time homebuyers, posting National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA) posters in English and Spanish in various locations, and post Fair Housing information on the City's website at http://www.pasco-wa.gov/index.aspx?NID=187. The City employs bi-lingual staff that is available to assist the public with many of their housing and other needs, and participates in the Language Line. CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 19 CR -40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d) Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to comment on performance reports. The City of Pasco participated in a joint and individual city citizen participation process in the development of the 5 -Year Consolidated Plan and 2015 Annual Action Plans. Public notices were published in Tu Decides, and the Tri -City Herald. The City of Pasco overall Citizens Participation Plan in the 2015-2019 Tri -Cities HOME Consortium Consolidated Plan, Appendix E. In accordance with the Citizen Participation Plan notice of the public hearing was published in the Tri - City Herald and Tu Decides Hispanic newspapers. The display ad, published in the Tri -City Herald on March 9, 2017 in English and Tu Decides in Spanish on March 10, 2017, also notified the public of opening of the public review period for the 2016 Consolidated Action Plan Evaluation Report (CAPER). In addition to being made available for public review at the City of Pasco planning office, the CAPER was made available at the local branches of the Mid -Columbia Library, Pasco Housing Autority, and posted on the City's website. The public review perioded was closed on March 23, 2016. No comments were received. CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) of CR -45 - CDBG 91.520(c) Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction's program objectives and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its experiences. There are currently no changes in program objectives projected. Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI) grants? 2M [BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year. CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 21 APPENDIX A - IDIS REPORTS PROI HUD Grants and Program Income PR02 List of Activities by Program Yr and Project PR03 Activity Summary (GPR) for Grantee PR09 Program Income Details by FY and Program PR1O CDBG Housing Activities PR23 Summary of Accomplishments PR26 CDBG Financial Summary PR54 CDBG Performance Profile CAPER OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 07/31/2015) 22 F - N� cE d Q 2 c$y 0a+- 0 E�� Q EQ E 0 U d G N E .24 a N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m olnln olol0 0 0 0 C O O O O O G C O O G C C O O O O C O O O O C C oD 00 Yi N N O O G G O O H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H O (O W T H H HHH H N N V M Oct co �n w n n OJ N W O O H N N N H H H H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N H a0 IR Op O O O O W d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N M O b b O O O O W lO O O O O O O O 0 O G G N O Oi O O O O O O O O O O O 9 9 H H g M M W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O N 0 ap d tp N O O d W O d at O� 0 0 OI d O1 N N M fp (p r O (p N (O CO r 0] N O N r N O d 01 f0 M M M d W Q7 W M V m 1p d M N N N N O O� (p O O tp tp of O� o� m N N (h M �(1 1n (O <O N 10 (O t0 (D t0 r t0 t0 (O t0 10 (O tO In In N d �(l N CO 00 ^q � rH g q q H t9 H g q q q H q q w q q q t9 g H q q q q q H H q N N w H O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O h M o W W O 0 0 o w 0 0 00 0 0 0 0q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d e o m ro o 0 0 o w m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A m-��-0 a ro M `�' g w o o -W O O O O O O O O O O O O O o o O N rnm� M a mm�MO fommmmnmmmmm<o m vtOi v°�i i0 u"'i �o uri � � m�� ««�v���w��HHHwHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH�� 0000C;60 I's gIwIN0.0� N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0N Q -. V N aMp OOi trp C N O a1t00 b OHININ G 0 0 o E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q A r d M M lV M t0 n m N u) 0 W M N O (V 1z lV m O N O Oi Oi M d ap Q N N M M tp N H N (O t0 tp (p O O tp tp tp {p �p {p {p N N tp v w (p V d H H H w H H HHH H H H g H H H H H q H H H H H H w H H H q H n r m 01 07 0) 0 0) O) O) 47 W N W D7 m 0) W D7 W A A Of W 0) W OI 01 0) m 0 0 m 0 mom 0 s 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o m o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 om 0 0 0 Z N �(I 1A 1n N N N N H to N U1 h N N V1 In h 1A N N N H IA N N N N N U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U O U O U U U A W O N M V N m r c W O N M N tp r 0 0 (7 mmmmm m m m m m m m m m mm m m m m m m m m m m m ma ma mmm E E m m m Z o 0 OU O O n U N N N W U d W d 0 d a u c a LL F W J Of a E U) m m p o 0 — 0. V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o 0 0 o c o c o 0 0 o c c c o 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 EHHwHHHHHHwwwHHHwwHHHHwHHHHHHwwwwwHHw 0 0 d rc 0 .= N N O O O O O O Z Lp O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n cp rn M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w N O M"000000 q O rn V nH M N N ¢ w w H H m.EO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O w n O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v aGv> O 0 0 0 0 0 0 m o 000000000000cooo 0 o eo «i Nio 0 0000 aE H 0 HHwHHH000 00HwwwwwHHHwwHwHHwww�noommHwwwww '0 n O w m m V N O M M ro rn m rn m rn m rn m m m rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn m rn rn rn rn m rn o rn o 000 a O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O E o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a OM 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M(p M o M M M Z ltl y Im N 1(I IA tp Ip N N 1A 1p l(J 1[1 Im h I() In IA IA N 1p N 1m Ip N IA 4p 0 N N N U O 000 222 rn O N M O h tp n M O� O N M V N 1p n m rn O � N M V N O N M N �p n M �° m rn rn rn m m rn m m rn rn O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q ¢ rn rn m C7 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a m a m m m m E m m z o 0 c O p UU p 0 m m N m y m f7 d W d K a V m L J FT W m a E p ° � a v v N i C N O a z c8 �a O E.O. �E E 0 U W, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N m' (R N(p N M 0 O" O M O M tp N W n 01 O O O 1� GO W N 1A lV V Oi O G O M N M N M CO M N N O M O (O No 0 N 0 In l() M (p O h N r A N M M In M` N OI f9 V fA N (9 Vi H d! Vi f9 f9 y �w w V w � O M0 (p pNi r T O O O n OJ M m n N N O O' N a Oa O 01 N 00 O) fp M M M M MM � (9 f9 f9 M NN d3 f9 � H � M t9 w 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 on Iq m corn ng o0 n M M M lA N aa 0) D O O M n M 0) n N W 0 ^ N V O Of N M 01 a0 M M 00 N O M O fD n (O N6 Ln N W (O N ' N r m N M M 1n M M N O f9 V t9 N w win ww www va w a in w m m rn rn m rn rn rn m m m rn m w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lfJ N 1A I(J 1(1 Ln I() In N llJ Y1 IA IA N N v�UU�v�UUUU�(.��o O N M V M M n M T O M v m 0 0 a N a v M o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 G C O 0 0 0 0 Ci C G E NenNNNNNNNNNNNN a a E a c �U a g E m E z a c m Lk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N 9 A rn m m rn rn m m rn m m rn rn rn rn m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o J N N N N N N N lM IMl1 N H N N N N y p o N 0 O N N r 0 mo m 00 m m m m m m m m m m a m W z v c /\) / *}/ §! ! /\ /mmomo/ �\ - E §�, }o\/ \z}\ \ r § z ()/( ) §\\ : ( G`(§ § z \ \k\\ \ i W5O.W / \ ( /(W2 }9 § 00 *}/ §! ! /\ /mmomo/ E §�, /\ /mmomo/ §k) #°la�s;;0;09 1aR:1.;1!{:};q @ a;@fnn°f w\l:,;;;;! ;;;El;§ .�,IS:;��w 0. ;;||■aag;;0�a §.) / ( \ ) /\/\ / � 000 ) /\ / / \\ \� /\ /( /) /0 / /§\} \} \ \\ } -Zoo ww wP: § 0, - § \ _ ( - -- /| /k §§§\ \ )! ( § (( <0 §Iwy _ _ =v § /[ _ _ /;§) §§§ §( §7 § §! §.) / ( \ ) / � \\ \� /\ /( /) /0 / / ( \ ) / /\ /( /) /0 / /k n N ti U O O S S O O O O S O O O V t� N O p O O O O O O O S N tOV N' N�� r»i n S O O O m b N N N N q Nm O S O O b O O b n A A 1 p Mm n OO OO G Oi pi OO D! O M a nm r S OO OO � OO 0 E a n Soy in n g oo m n omN mm no �o u w w n rvuni mo n a e o r0 D o m a g o mm a m m '° m om i wwww "'www pm voi M r � m �y W di F O "n Nom' rn mm NMi f � � d C Mm 5888 w mwmN ry O O o 0 O om m O .o 00 5 O N 00 N N m i a E m W O S O S M m S 5 m amo�i n N m N M n0000 m � o m mvo pyD o mm Q ry n rv` ~ C J LL ~ E w coo w .mo mm u m o coo u m m mm m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a o 0 o u o 0 0 0 0 u v u v u u u o u u a'% iO E E E E o E E E E a Ao E E E E o f N o 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U 0 0 o U U U a 00 o 0 0 0 U U U U 0 80 N m m E = ¢ W N m W u E E Ymi,v < wa wo h z O E T.. r0 U moa. z w z w F g m o.N O 6 w m O N= a mw m w O w 2 C 0> a U U W W m O 1 O W J > m O z 0 LCW w '�' vaiOwa .10 wo w w w ❑ '0 ,.❑., �" o ozFww wwm ra LL �mz ro '02 S'°i 4a iomrr trz �c9 m O Z�lwm zw'm wm c m O y r�wzY Y j 0 y N C ` E O E > } o. Ln E 0 > 0 N O E a i O O m CM a� c c a 01 c N U c In j d � a Qa 0 �- N c �_ E YI E v o E M o w CL N 0 N > V5 O 7 0 m 0 SOJg�N* i Vy� a o� � w W � rda * JQme dO Sn ANO z z W U W N F j Q H N o U z m Q LL U O L F LU r_ Lu g z O U C7 m L) U O N U J N O 0 0 N 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o m m R m OD r M Lo V 6Ni V r U H3 fA (A fA to fA fA N a 'A c rw c I d a d F a a' 'M C J m :o LL z d N W E rn K � c Z U Z c .a c a N c eC LL R R , m Z m c d � N c QO Q m a I d d a 'M m :o N j E K � d Z U Z .a c a N c eC C R R C m Z d d QO Q m a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Qp 0 F E R R U n m Q Q z Q Q m O = m 0 F C R N_ S d c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � R F C R � d 3 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r I d d a m 06 N j K Z U Z c a c eC C R R C d QO Q m Q mmm Qp R U m Q Q z Q Q m I 0 N N �M .a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ID N c c L Q) E m CL E > 0 o y E > o c 0 0 0 0 Q) .0 � rn N a O Q d v o D c ,00 C c o- c c a o 0 o _ m c Ov vn c m a C: m v) c Q o CL a � v v 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 E A a c E a E w E8 E tf a o m CL o N �L j d vi 0¢ 0 0 0 0 0 M O a m ~ U C m � N y 0 0 0 0 0 L d "NO N d r N > O Do W a OO� J u , =.�. > N @ 2 O O J ; :Ln N V O a J 9p Q 2 O F d LL Lu � W O J� O Z H OS71 d = 0 PWD 6 Z [Y ;a p O N N M 10 M N M O V N 2 E 16C\ .� ;4 O rl M J � O� U3 fA f9 :M O O` E �' _ a U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ui 0 0Fa ;W 9 U m c 0 y U m N = c Z a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Y m Z K 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o 0 0 0 o r d d t» F» va <» w Z Q } H N m K Z O N c Y 0 R d w ¢ C F E= U C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 F- F- d m Q O F N 0 w C h U H ) J M M� W d N M �� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c a M N g O y m Q E C O C N to w W E V m W N E N d co a y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Q U d p o U co ? a o F E a y d c O 0 Z LL pi > K 'O .c. E U 0 0 C 0 W m @ O O 2 co a w a a Q 3= O E p N O J O o 7 0 U m E a E v_' m E a N o 0) o M N m E t!w U rn ? Z Q O O O o a �n a o 0 U CO Z lM ¢ +�,+,` u O W N C7 V C CL ¢ Z m m v m Z J h d U N Qo U W o o Q a M O a W N m c� D o " o a' a } a c Z Y o N O= m Q 55 W X N J N O U Q m d m j j �_ Z U Q M d Q N W O O_ F N W U !E N j l5 Z U Z Z 0 N M D Z 'C d C aE c ob J a Z wQ LL 7E N M V m w 5 c- llyg O N O o M c N U r d' > _ W d F- p• .. L N Q O Q d Q .. JS1NG N N Q F- E E c m o NZQ o� j 0w0 a rn o ;O '> zwZ c= m '� c o a' c a u " ¢ m 't m' E f0¢ a C� c d } •• v LL a LL>w d 3 Q d u¢ o ,a 5 b e P d Q y o U O a Uwp C O] d 2 N N > r d m l6 Q Q n- Y m N E m E N m E L N Si} PN C7 o •£ d a 0 cc W c U O d ¢] Q Q Z Q Q m Q O Q a s n J o U_d' IL F d Z Q a §Q � < / i / LU § G EL Z <§ \ §§ $ 0. § �Z } : \E <- { � e\ \; § oE0t :\ §2 ! 75 ±\§ ,0, [(2\ \ \/)f a/§ kE §- qm :& }/o ��\\/ �k/ja), , LU<> E< °� f!f K ,\�z� R§ esE „ � -kM\/ m{ } ,0/ �\m } §1:\ ` _ / - - r - k< |0< >Lu c m�»@E §2§ ��,�, @o ` ; < \/}»® =-Z )!CL �\( _ 42{§! e0 .�` !:/aE E a<W !\_-$ * % 7 ;k3± CL '8 0 za `w—ff ; Q<5 Q $ O C N Y O E >. } d n E p E ` a a o D C E a a Oc" O c tp + In CZ as o E v 3 O E a) OE U 0 E 0 CU Ln c V 0 H Q m 0 U M R Vl N d W N O (n U E (n N I a` W U) J N w Z U N = a 0 m J J w < c 3 Q N O K O W W N z _ O LU H ~ o m o Y U 0 o O ¢ a �- c a ¢ O O U o uti g a a LU W O> OU K O Q Lu a£ Da U � N Q o O E N o N O CN U M R N d Q N O U E v N I a` m o,w U) J V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O d C N 3 = O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F N N ~ E v v U a m o,w N N w J W U = a 0 2 z w < c 3 m K O U LU Q W U o 0 U m d o 0 N Z N �- c W W =w E � F- a LU W O> K C m m Da U � 0 Z Z J W U F m W W Y m A O ¢ U A df 0 WfL p LL N ~O i v U m w W N U a QW m W of LU 2 N (.5U) Yw Z ¢ m c D m U z W W CL O z �5 Ow a c U � ' N p I R a0 t0 C Y w0 Y = J V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O d C N 3 = O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F O :�2 ;a E Q c U ui U d � m v m m W of z U z z c a c c R t0 C Y m Y Y U � d Q 0 Q d Q V N Q N N N Q N U y m c 3 c ui m c_ w "• U E a 'c d � C C� C l6 •• � m n iR ~ m Q Q z Q Q m C O Q 2 f O :�2 ;a �OJg1N*1N'��l' d ME o W ba * JQ�e �0 gn ANO 0 C 0 c r M u rn v o O N N N a Y o 0 0 0 0 0 c O a a a 75 0 _T a O a 0 E O C J Lu 0 0 :Fz 0 0 0 a Z a > N W N W V W W Z i L) W U w H K m W o�- a❑ 0 w� z¢p J 7 N W ❑ W N W rX LU J � Uma yOQ CL a�� wU0 z0a W (n Z oww tea= OM Z � Y LU =00 rW¢ Y Q D >afU � W Z Q O J w�U n. W rn o w O�g Qmo U -j LLI m 2 H ❑wg W X w� Uop W NrF- mLL W "Z www CO 0L,Jz wJo 7QK c�a F § � $ E : ( ,CL 0 § \ \\ \ � k®// oma`) t \ 2!AE ƒ}{ § ® \\& /� _ w \i]f o/}\ . / . e=w o §. ; 002 _\{/\ 0CL LU 0 �k\[ § ; {� {\2] » ® § ( r� )§ {0 �k\\ z \� �# 2 & § !k _ _ : 2 :m / 2( § 0 \ �% e ikE z LU [ \7 �k § ! j \.� \ \ 0 \ 2 2 )f o § 2 @) 0 0 o , : §§) 3.;2E & $§ ; z !k ` :0 0c any /; �0) . //3)%f#!a 55�f < 0 0 ( : \ \� Z _ = 2 /\ � _�0Z; ■_ Q 2 / : __: _a,-.. o � ■;a 'E M, § \ k/\ 002 oo� § \ 14 E :\ 22LU ! = \\ E42 /(k . °0 IL Z \ j § \ & } \\\ } f)c § \■)�j§) /E<<z<</ 22 A_ „ _,, :\ 22LU ! = \\ E42 /(k . °0 IL Z :\ \\ \ j § \ & } \\\ } f)c § \■)�j§) /E<<z<</ :\ )r ! F- ;\ LU ID § \ 11 oa \om \0. ` ) 2 32± §/ ]\§} -�}�< �\ o 0 MA F W � Ew E �t«a !® °%» )k }/{§ s vioa< - ,_:, §k a w &- \ ` - � )/) „ : 2 k)/ - 2e2 fret' /§)) = ® ` / §7! \ ` &n Lu z a- ] „ '-I O y N G L N y O E >} CL en E O lO R C C m d O c m � O C o + !n j d c n 0 _ w c E E u°O E O CL vi O S Q 7 (� CO u U 2 J 0 O m 0 Z n v 0 m m 3 U a O M M LU Z 9 H O W w L R w F - 0 o 0 C C N 2 m 2 d IL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N J 0 } O O E w w Q @ Oo 2 a w c � C cl Q m W Q Q) O O O O O O C N N K N E w Q Q 2 0 a Z Q 3 L LL W clQ CL a r Z LU � U w W �p 0 O o � o W N Z U W N v � m Q a n LU O_ c a N R M U) C7 O � O 2 z d Z F r � a C d o LL y = Z o q M d y > w r' E p E -' m a vi o ca d c c 00 Q rn 0 y 3« 0 2 C a N O LL a W W CD d J Q L .= N m� R 0 :' O a 2 5 o cmi2: �_~a` ¢ Z m r O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R _ n N O 2 f O r z-3 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N_ m d � F-- '-' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m d _N 3 2 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m F V .`s Ln O a a U) J O M M LU Z 9 H O W w L R w F - 0 o 0 C C N 2 m 2 d IL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N J 0 } O O E w w Q @ Oo 2 a w c � C cl Q m W Q Q) O O O O O O C N N K N E w Q Q 2 0 a Z Q 3 L LL W clQ CL a r Z LU � U w W �p 0 O o � o W N Z U W N v � m Q a n LU O_ c a N R M U) C7 O � O 2 z d Z F r � a C d o LL y = Z o q M d y > w r' E p E -' m a vi o ca d c c 00 Q rn 0 y 3« 0 2 C a N O LL a W W CD d J Q L .= N m� R 0 :' O a 2 5 o cmi2: �_~a` ¢ Z m r O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R _ n N O 2 f O r z-3 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N_ m d � F-- '-' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m d _N 3 2 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m F :O 'a ;a ui d a m� R l6 Z V Z c a c a7 c R R c m t m v d Q O Q d Q R R R Q v c 3 c °L>•' L chi m w .>_ a`> m U Q m Q Q Z Q m :O 'a ;a $r ! 06 �(L\ , k\)/ \\\\ ®� 8 cm \ _\\§ )/!2 r W E - �t2z O#&OL /{2 _ § u ) : � :/\ §§0 41/ k 3f)$/) O y, N c E E O E ) } v a u E v o rn 0 > Y O E d c D CO O N c c c � a O C N " U d ED °a Qa 2 ?- W � c E a E E v E rip O Q D a vi OS (o 00 u W M ry 2 J m 0 z A d C } u Q N O L a n W O U Z 0 0 0 O N F Z U' z_ D O 2 U m a w Z CO C3 U ¢ WO O� F N CL a z3 ZD cl xm O W ¢ a� O uJ ¢7) 2 C7 v m CL oc O0 W U W W W Of U �- =,to of 0 W rn W W N ? W O 0 N m z U O 7 z O Oz U W U_ W m0 W K >a m 0CL� W O �7 �Up v Cz 7 J c o ¢KO O 3 z Lu x C m N d K 7 W d X LL O C = 0 W z 2 LL 3 N M V N d N a[ - U W 0 N Z U Z c d c 06 N Y N y N m ¢ O ¢ m E Q m m m L 3 `a ¢ U U Utp E Q m Q Z Q m I8 /§ %) « LU LU [Z \- 0) ag2 /r §)/ # \ a §2[ ;;\ (`\ ozz ( LU Lu <0LU \ < 0 \\§ a0z �y ®e • )\ - ° kco // /\\\-of z < W mCl§ I8 /§ %) « LU LU [Z \- 0) ag2 age §)/ §2§ \ a §2[ ;;\ (`\ ozz ( LU Lu <0LU \ < 0 \\§ a0z �y ®e �2) )\ - (Y>SO /\\\-of z < W mCl§ uF ale (\ (k/ /(� k/r \( E §\� __± §®® =B® wG \{ /j\ /(� §5 \$; )\k §§ \*§ \W= \m cow ,u/ ,< 9// e§ /// \/: >U) �W \(&\ o-§ , 0k (§N two /)Z) /§D /< 2$ƒ Z$( - 2WW /< \}Z / f / p }\ (ff} Lu < <0 G$2 3\m§ 4/ \{\\ f{\/ } /k/� �£� �_ MA EE %2] C ## }/{> / \ ) � � k f,,,,, \ !E E M:( <o ' ¥ ! \ 7 .= )) J, ! \ . .§ |I§]_{ # ƒ / _}!00 ® © - a ` lk; � �. nP c I8 /§ %) « LU LU [Z \- 0) ag2 age §)/ §2§ \ a §2[ ;;\ (`\ ozz ( LU Lu <0LU \ < 0 \\§ a0z �y ®e �2) )\ (Y>SO /\\\-of z < W mCl§ uF ale (\ (k/ /(� k/r \( §\� __± §®® =B® wG \{ /j\ /(� §5 \$; )\k §§ \*§ \W= \m cow ,u/ ,< 9// e§ /// \/: >U) �W zz§ o-§ , 0k (§N two /)Z) /§D /< 2$ƒ Z$( - 2WW /< \}Z }of }\ (ff} Lu < <0 G$2 3\m§ 4/ I8 M f; U g d a O c O Z d � 9 Y v m CL a` Q 9 y o ° n O z K a w LL LL U 0 0 a O Z Z H U) Y N Y K 3 U w O CL a U U LU U 3 U Z O H K F z Z 0 z a } LU LU 0 a U Q O Z zw Y cm O} 00 Q w W ° WD LL Or Q U 0 O K 00 K U O� F W L) Se K O0 W y a2 LL O O� 1 Z c OK a c Fw C 0Q Q m u� a � w M a WO m C D �.LLI O N N d n m c m o LL Z W ° H 3 a m S N .Q ° d V E d N O m Oi No Q N y U y 0N > N Q N m m a a y a U U a` ¢ 2 c R N d @ c R N e6 c U ° Q O Q d Q N N N Q U U N E m E C U m Q Q Z Q Q m R � p 0 F a c 0 N m E _ o` a m F- � o m a o = C F R R N N °i of M M c R m ao n N_ 1 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N a O F Li . a C N 3 = O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cD m 0 0 U v m m v C7 d n m c m o LL Z W ° H 3 a m S N .Q ° d V E d No Q N y U y 0N > N Q N m m a a y a U U a` ¢ 2 d m D 3 No > = w > m Z U Z C V c R N d @ c R N e6 c U ° Q O Q d Q N N N Q U U N E m A C U m Q Q Z Q Q m ^ o N � Z •M N C ,O l6 U t0 ItoE t E N_ Q Y Q O O L @ L N d E2 d N J J Oa pe we N d O N C N C N @ b @ @ N .2-6 (9 IC N tti U G kc Q @ Q @ o Z,c r c Y N CM C E m U Q U Q Qc N } E N C N 0- lA E J O C fib O N U N U p@ Q@ o > o m �m M fll fp Oi d d e d o E O M V M DC O O O LO w1 f0 .`_d" c c a m E c U � O do do c' m Y tf (n .= a aci na a- -6.,; O ,�` E Q)O O N O fO o L R L@ of p fp. U p. n N � f/J !0 O E d y O Of= 9 @ Ep '" E -.4z ami E C1 E v^ $^v N H @ N A O Y n m @ —N @ — N a D- a 0- O O O O O U O UL. vio O ti Q R N L d N L N 0 0 m 0 ~ m=C m=C O @ m O @ V N m m h m m `y00000 �a�ma� @ Y L6 Y R C C N m@ "'Fu Z Z C 'vi O TO.@ d d Y o L y (/J Y TN E o m E o m L m C a E mo¢ may¢ ofmmc y J d E � mc Ea @ a @ � 1ly � 051SG G s o — E bi m * Pic E LL v w 3 0 o Y d 12a sn PtoJ 6 z r a Q i N N a ri O C N N i i O o a n E w o rn c v a O C N O C 0 a 0 a a� x°O aEi� C N 7 C E E E v E � o v Ln CL m > � O S LD m 0 U rl w W W K F 3 w z z z J CL 0 z Q Y J W (n z z Q 0w of = OD c� 0 mm 2 K C7 0 U ww ZU w g wa ~w LU m J W h LU zF wD U W �z � Z ¢ W z O - � N W o Z LU O � J Z OQ (_)D- U) aN J ¢ mw LU d O p CL LU rn�¢ 5 LU .2 cO 3 a ❑> c O a 0 X W c C O W W L 0 N N O O ,,r.,, i0 M V ae d @ Z h C 0 8- z Z w 2 ujO K LU � 0 � N 7Cf O O U 2 ¢ o U) O rn Q m p Q Z O � z w a 0 N > @ r Q O a @ a ry M N EZ E n rl w W W K F 3 w z z z J CL 0 z Q Y J W (n z z Q 0w of = OD c� 0 mm 2 K C7 0 U ww ZU w g wa ~w LU m J W h LU zF wD U W �z � Z ¢ W z O - � N W o Z LU O � J Z OQ (_)D- U) aN J ¢ mw LU d O p CL LU rn�¢ 5 LU .2 cO 3 a ❑> c O a 0 X W c C O W W L 0 N N O O ,,r.,, i0 M V ae d @ Z h C 0 8- E O 0E -a O y N C L E m 0 } n cn E c 0 E d -0 Q L L 7 m C O- 01 C I U In a a a o v w c �n L 0 E a m E v E nfO{ cl N O [D u U J504G 1 0 ba * JP�c ao sn P\A° > U w O 0 0 z Q N Z C) Z O F- < a Q Q N N Z O O � O Q Q O QoN o M 7 X 0 Q � a ^� o O 0 0 N O M U N O r C m > c } U U 00 LL Q c2 O O N @ v + a s 2 n E U N a c c m m c p, N O 0 a O N > E U U O C 2' m c � E E � 0 0 U E O c 0 0 o 0 w S m O � ry T `m a E h m BUJ U N E N m m � Y O o a d S � N m d V c C C m '6 N m c N 0 C m J m C N m m a 2 o m `o a m w N V C m a Q � C N m m Y � O VO U rL- m t0 3 m a m Z c w C m E E Lu U N ow C m C m m m m U m N O N O N C m E 'O y Q O d m O m ^ w U U O co 6 O p cj U' 0U Fno c U w P P ii 0 m V @ o y� N r m u r U O E c n N N S d a O 0 F U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O @ m w o = F m F 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p O 0 o p 0 O O O 0 U Q @ Y V U N � m m oty � R � f0f0 Z V Z Z c a c ab c m m m Q 0 Q m Q .. ccc EZ -i-52 Q m m@ Q m U h m U Q U= U QU E ac m _ m Q Q z Q Q m Q O Q m F kk/ )tE� f(ƒ{ /2\g ca _ 0- a, o E ° _ ®Eb _ {k/FiL 4v 0 t%8 2 5f \0 < _ / . � \ !{ !t }/ {7§0 r 2z !« a « ` a CL 0 k J \ |f : ( k \ w 2:1 o a§( E- \ k)/ w_ , 2]\§ ± RJ! :_2222 - �; . 3 wow _ )/ ; |! /C f - � » \\�k %$a \ # « z (¢cu a/\/ § ,£ /° \ § / )? o }§ \ \ I q q7 f o , (( §CL ` k - - } 2 , \ L) ZD-- ! �\ /\ LU 8 0 0® - | ! f $� `�0 42 % ! �_•f !#@ % n� ®0 )k /k)$)k< )`® ®` §/f 7��{(kk / ^ 2 22 ;a8f+�) Z < z & 00 Q kt/u 06 o(6�\ i\)[ \\\\Cd . „ -2\/ _\{0 _ )/E1 �,_, §� =,O, \0 / \t«3 #< a/\2 �0t </,,,,, _ § ca ° J / Mn 0 „ _ } f= !k \ /(/ '®� ��_® * 0 E cc 7 ) 8 \ �� § t f a _ _ |!!��lk! ! ;} J}) % �z \� �) i fs!m _ ® © >. <: - �} CL k! $ { ) : CD CR \\\ ' § E ) \ }»\16° c C) )tE�- »E0. Ch {i )/ CL k10/ ) ][\ ) ! {A) _\{f) /{m} 0 {k)2 J\2V) \ // `LU ® \ m0 G= co co LU 3 ° #/ 2J , § \! :k §) |! } \ -6 \ «22§|G� waa 0 _ /f!f $«! ` ( '8 - y - -®Em 2.2 CL 4.; / - :f/&« 7CO )|e ©®+ 70IL ,L 228&! a. 2®Z Jaa / g J 5 a O m c z Flq a s 5 h J r z z LU g 0 LU1 O CL N CL W r N W ¢ U N n ~ < z g o ¢ F W o 0 O IL U o ¢ o a Y N UO ¢ n m U H a z 111 N d O N ¢ W O d v U d h U N M o n c o N O M U r Flq a s 5 h J r 0 N a d E U o m co a a _ a d N f0 m N N L a a Ln U L d E `m d w w N d dd � - l0 f6 N c adrn° N O y N w C N N y N U co dao � Q Em°o o d C a Q N 00— O O m E m E o L6 E o .d �'a w ro r a F o F N U d g w ¢ U_ 3 N a d� > N c d Z y > 2.9 C_ d0. 3 w E d C C U C d N E N d d E L O ` n ,r0 E C a �O -o aai V C N cL ¢ N O N U y •U LL a w N O 'G A y _ R 6 (D o d H U p . q m N lC6 p, N C0 a C M ' O d z a C ¢ O z ;a m 0 y N E L E R o E > r —E n to E O E m OE d L C O O C C c cc -0 a R 'E N V O c R t+ V) d o a _: aa) w c EE N E 0 E m O v V fl- E _ N > v O .Yc m U > O m 0 z i ry L > CL 0- n U N a aC C R d c 0 d O n a � d E d U '0 c D d c � 3 E E o U E � O c 0 � o o c L d `o c NT d0 E a N Y y E N R L O « O OO d 'O N 0 3 R d .0 a C � @ @ N m c N � c � � 0 a y R C N R d n o � m � w a c c d Q N C y R p U « ad U 0 Z m o a$ R E d W U d ow a � R m d O m U m N y a E d C y Q> n ?.? m C W U 20 C7 oUmo c d mO d I" C � Uwl�-F�ii 0 0 w O O d U O O C O O 3 @ 0 o O n a N o E ea fn � F Q c a � m @ a Z w o E F li 0 U R u w d a 'x 3 O a c d c F m m C7 0 s d 0 Z w E U 0 E m n E U � o N U E N > Q Q R u O 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 O O O 0 a F ay. a c d i o s d Z w E 0 E O n E U U E N Q Q U h � Q @ _ 0 0 U F d Q Z O 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 O O O 0 U 0 E Q v r U @ m N .6 � h d > U > Z U Z Z c a c ed c @ a @ T Q @@@ Q N U U C j C Y U C C(a > = N R U E U- C U@@ E@ U E d@ n 6] Q Q Z Q Q fL Q F O Q= k/\ \ )tE� \\ /2\0 _){\/ ` _ o EW _ `b) )k/2 ` {\k) }e\ƒ = m co , J / ° k { k{ k/ {7!/�{ $co _—_ ® / ) ) s « n 2 LL 2} / oo N ¢ E O N C ;O o�� 2 �.' E # O P a :a O � c 0 Z o 0 � 0 0 } 0 0 £ N N d f9 W O y d C d C £ 0 3C o o m U N p C 2 d N L a) o to H v a (/1 d N U ' C .- £ N O O U Q a U C O O a U£ LL p N a o L o M > U 0- 'E vO dY }o cm c m +• vl O O 2 fi m 'G a a) o d o Z E aa) y 'E = E 3i 0�0 E T5 y a (6 C E V1 E d o o NY 6 p Ew E U j I o y O o N p y U)aj a) .> vi 0 W ` T m co 'O J2 m 00 p Z O_ N y d E ¢ m 0 N U (7 an d rn O an d C� WN N y Z vu' z a N .p p W M _� d ¢ d E J U > O> Q CL U N M E N C E o O' Z O- v1 m LL w d L aaO� O d O m o N E o h0o U N N U@ C s° is G ` o - c I U U F w N p O A .� v e y b a * N ¢ is `u m 'ted' O C' m .R. 6 d F U C JPS �Q S!1 r Of F PNa a 2 �o U a` O0 U H iLL __. d : a \Q - E =5m / kE/ \ / \ §\2 j m - « /) c !{t \)0 /ƒƒ\ )} \i7 \}k -o _»■ )\ E 3$2 ]/)/ . :/0 0 !x \k 0 . c-0 @lag #,a rG; §< .. _){\$ )/)&� !� )( I' /k// - {\«a �® w )< CO:Z. ° 0 \§/t ®2.2 LU _ /a.coV - co Cl) u !§ k} LLJ ))_ \� 0 Z4 j 12§0 _ } fj & ( CL ; § CO \ \\ § _ 0 !)]) {LU$ ) )£ .! ,|«a! !ƒ G 00 /{ re »«% _;_�0 ,,, , - �k\/ $# .�. 00 ({ (ƒJ \ _k > _ . / { �g)\ /k/ \ t { _)/( $}r CL k� »O�2)\ it9U] /!\ ! , � \ 0 k § �/ \\� �»v \ / 0 7 ! 0 !8 /z0 \ { \ a $\0) ;0_7/§( { a. § ) \ \ /{} #\ : / \ \0< \`` }\ E k .#.f«)+¥:ECL /aJƒk\»B{\/f) \:�2:� \ ' E k} \/ � CD\\\ �0 kC \\\ 00`{ k0 ]cu i){ 3 J $ \ 0-6 §t { / k22g . *§ R!§ _Qt\\ ■ o \k @ � —_0 {k/2 ( < { 0 �{ U) � /!\ > . LU 0 ui < \ }\ \ !\ LU LU»} §� ) § 2F-° 0 \ § �\ �/ _ >; 22 » Im �i z �_\� /� j - —f]/\« ®©+ %0 or 2/§)\ � \ 0 k § �/ �»v \ 0 7 ! 0 � \ �/ \ 7 !8 /z0 \ { \ a $\0) ;0_7/§( { a. § ) \ { /{} #\ : / \ \0< \`` }\ E k .#.f«)+¥:ECL /aJƒk\»B{\/f) \:�2:� \ ' 0 y 0 0 0 0 O 3 D O d N 0 O N 0 O C ayJ Si1PW) JP LL W J �G Z H d 0 N ID y CD N C Q) E E L � E > } o Ln Ea o 0 o A m O o E d R C n c w Eu E m o CL v D _ VI p Q 0 0 0 0 0 c m o � 0 V d o 0 0 0 0 c K y 0 0 0 0 O 3 D O d N 0 O N 0 O C ayJ Si1PW) JP LL W J �G Z H d 0 N k)/ \ 0 0 » ■ ( \ LU uj LU ¥\ / of 2 S <_ m j \ \ LU CL /) §! E CL 7\ \\ (\ § ■ E ) 0 § / \ 0 \ \ � ` } m \> k / 20 r -! - & (\ \ _ \k 0 ,|«A! ._� ({ 0§! LU ^`;k E - /\ ( §\{&&� ,• ; : {G]�&7 \� |/)\ j §, zO /- ; a .a. fN {§J gjR § \ ( kE/ { \ .\ W \ CL § 0 \ CL to a � \»\{ . §t E\ aƒ -T2 ) ; - tl=m fE k\/2 o/}f §!2t 4i Cd 2 (�\g 0c 00 _ . 15 AGI = _]{m) )/(ƒ 0 `b {EE CL_ ifG - a 0. \//i /\ ) }\ .\ \°,\ 2G : : ) _- u ) §I / )ƒ - !# # § § ; {/ a f / _ \ )_- \\ CO) 3\ °§ $ LU !\ ;k�� ] ! 2 °{j)\ _ -E E =e• !% Ck ( 20 0 \ IL m :.! {;M �®- LL ;_ �'/\ # w_ ={\=f. co 0 co a; 2ƒ / )!§)\k \ ,: IL 4 , O y N C E i T o E > } V a to E > o c m N O Ot 0 O E d i 0 O m of 0 G O OU C p Q j S CL a _ vcu c E �_ E N E v E m o CL � u_ Up�11 y V vi Oco � Q co a 0 Lu Z w Z = F r � Y O Y a J a ¢ O U U w a N Z O W ¢ a (O M O N O M rl N m R R) a c (n 0- 0 o N O m . R p N d m F- 0 U w R � a R C c m m L U N O � N R 0a O E R c 0 L rno C_ N nE � o L U � C m C � � U y O Y O O R 0 a 0B C Z.2 N R m>a O W R n E E >R E c o U L 0 r �9 R O R � m CLMaY m�E L U U O Y N R N n m R R R O m C N � N Cp N O 4 ) co .Lm- aai r ry N R N N OL- R O dR� a N M � o } N R u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Ma U O O O O O O O O O O O O C m n R_ R R � K V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E m a a 3 = O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :4 I- o R m0 c r m a » c v c a m m R c U U a E b ep O N 0 LL Z R L d d m y m R W r a E H < o :. a c LO U c n= o U Z O 0 6 Em O c m m c 0 ob Q 'y 0 c � �m c U W a a a 0 C .V C7 0 0 @ g A O C O m n 0 _ O a' d r L U O r c w E E O UM.2tti. R N N d Q 2 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :4 I- R m0 c v m R U = N ep 'O - E N > Ln Ea < a Z U Z c a c 0 ob C R R c U o_ @ L @ U E c c E ¢ R N N ¢ U UR m .? m R U M Q Q Q Z Q o0 m0 c m R U = U 'O - E :U Ln Ea < a L N y 0 :M O o_ CD O y N C E ` m o E > } nE N N O o m E a j Wo � O W ti UU C 10 ++ a v o d O E v c E 9 E E o E O Ln OLD J L4 O ti Q � l7 m 0 U 0 M- r: c r N— r r o 0 ro a 06 m z d � � c L a L a N o 3 > a E y o m 6m ay..o T d o o 0 mp. d t d N O Y O N J = m C mZ> M L a o U m w.3 m A U m 2 y c a E uy o w pE Oxy U N E m rn ='62 c�> rnm m O m y y C n d y U = C C d' y T U J n r � m Y n m a m m p N U Na U p d d y o t M CL $ p m y L y > E y m m o y U y a � C L p L �W j L LL r R C r O m a = y 00 y H d m— = d ca 80 E c 0 m rn o a c d — = N 0 0 O O O c d anmC o- � J'd t0 U j d a N L L O m U p U N C N m C V d o 0 O p _T d 0 d E O 2J O C T 3 0 0 W J 2 Z F d m z d � � c L a L a N o 3 > a E y o m 6m ay..o T d o o 0 mp. d t d N O Y O N J = m C mZ> M L a o U m w.3 m A U m 2 y c a E uy o w pE Oxy U N E m rn ='62 c�> rnm m O m y y C n d y U = C C d' y T U J n r � m Y n m a m m p N U Na U p d d y o t M CL $ p m y L y > E y m m o y U y a � C L p L �W j L LL r R C r O m a = y 00 y H d m— = d ca 80 E c 0 m rn o a c d — = N 0 0 O O O c d anmC o- � J'd t0 U j d a N L L O m U p U N C N m C V O y, N C E ECL Y o E > } a Vn E L ON @ O � a L G O O T cm C C v O C fC0 Y o < j ao i C V1 7 CL L O 00 E E U =) a O U c N y7_ Y V vi US Q m u U fy' n O m 0 z Y u Q y o W � O N m v CL a` n O O O O 0 O O p O O O O r n E of to m Q M m � m a > c m � m a N c w C � m U Y N N U O m O d� (D O fn m O O i N w3 � aR� m m � c m o <o c = t0 0 O E m } a N j N C N O W m rn �- m C7 O � U Dm E w o o. U O s F C 3 C N N LL Z o s C d y �m w ."_' E A d m E N N O O C y 0 a 0 o d 0 ° R a ami o aLi ; 0 ° ? 8 E 5oUK�i!_U~a ¢ 2 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O c R C N o CL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 F- 0 U 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N n A N_ F O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 O m F° - U O o o o o o o 0 0 a 0 0 c m n 2 r c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C L n C m 3 = O O a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O F d d3O N oif .0 Z Z c d c C R m C m QO Q d Q m m R Q Q Q m Q Z Q m 0 a+ N C E V O E T } O O N EO C O N O o N E o a 5 o o Q c H a d m ol 6 N N a j a N p a u 0 0 0 0 0 0 N _ o o J Z m m E a a w E o o v E - V a Q O L6 p M Q 0 0 0 0 0 (D 0 m u U N � v o 0 0 0 0 a c d Ix t O) E N y 0 O 00 O 3 ~ O 3 d s a h vi d w 1N� ° t O JS�NG °aO> ° a � O O J a��ST7 tL W J Z H d C PNOJ Q O Z O y, N v E d N N} 5 E n E > 0 p N a E 0- '0 O O c a a O C " O c m Q 7 a a a 2 N c c E E N E u°O E o O � � L c Q U' 00 u 0g,�NG lry�� ooh * �� ~ W 6a * JQOe 9a Sn ANO Q J d a O 0 m z M" F z W LU W m O T O w CL 2 W 0 r O N W U M Z LL O OM FZ W rn U Q a0 t CL O Y U U J Q `O CL zW O IL` W 0 V C V) O O 0 a O N O M - 0- ry L Y u Q y 0 d r O N d U IL d V J N O N � m O T M E O @ `O .M IL` t- F ;d . a C N M O N O N m cq E m o � .0 0 d a` c m 3 d m c � d 0 0 0 L O r r M M tD � a d d a d a c c LL � C U N d ❑ a t U r � Y � N N C X M d U d N d p m N 0 0 a d @ N N a tu N d N lA (D d O a U d d N (D E C d N N Q d O a d } U N y d j F- 1 o d m N z a d Z J N d L �. LL z O y C U £ a. t W H •- d 0_ O O E c d O a d m a as ;O OI m ui u � E c O 0 C)C °' C C 0 m 3 c B O C d < .Q 'a C d @ �p F r 6 F Uca C "O • M ~ .O 5 <.s L I _v IL ¢ Z a )/ { im {K# - < :< oja ! - k// §W ) <0 } \{ . \k §\ \2$ tk §§ \ 2) /} >0 - w- - \ _ a-§ : \ / 0 \>( {t/\ - a ` LU M ; _ & {/2 >0 �_CL 0 0E /7/[ 0.,o - aE ± E \m \f &2/ 3(3 0W -_ _\}f\ 002 )/$}~ C3 z 00 0 - r «0 { ED E 00 ■a° E )3 )t§ -%7aF- ! F- 2e\ CL= `# » ) \ ® 50 k fK\ /°q/ ( ® !j c !#� u ( <0 /o e Z F -E \0 ([' )\ \/ ` */ _!!0 - A0 ; {(/\ m e ; ° 0 / 6LU O \ 2- §� . k([\ -� 0 \i $}\ wee` (( `� /k2 «; ,k ! }{2 G E §» !eQ)\ wa r o:� :.«__| -- ; � ,= !En E - - y \§ = # °z < 0 0 !!§\r �- �®am ®® °-'®/k - -2%za� !/) \\ /k§(/) uk/� }/\ 0 N •M N Q W W 9 2 1- a :m a 0 N N G W i o E > r � nin E W Ol O Ol o a v D m c a N 4 N ^� u 0Ln o a rn c U Mo ro j d W oQ a m N v o E W D in of ri E E �' _N E j R } 46 N N E R } vi O a o a o EIL m a F L U y c c a 3 ; C R R LL O R R R O O O a roJyry*tN�� O ti w U VI � �� 2 rbs •d i� Q0e a-�O J •cf s n PNS O o_ 0 F w (!! o � a c 0 0 0 o p 0 �0 l0 M O O Ow O n E c O O O O w w o m .v I^n b E 1 N inO 40� w �w LO N N O O C C W � v W v O ;� E E E s N N . a o A M E E oN m o O c m <C d U rn 0 N o E Qa E _ N E o P E a n a c E in in o D E � o m 0 � U a N `pi 0 u 0 v yj O c ^ OJ O � M f ^ N O N O D N a N o N O O V a « v of ZE lO w a M N tlF yrw wan N M N ILA N N C -0 c O O -+ N Y7 01 O p, V E O U *I c 0 U 0 Y L Z a M — N .t M N . yf w w a N 0 M n N Cn O N M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p 0 �0 l0 M O O Ow O n M O O O O O w w N O MN w u� C '^• I^n b O ti D N inO 40� w �w LO N N O N W � w W N N N 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0o O M p w co p 0 0 0 0 0 O O O w w N O MN w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M w w w w w ww 40� w �w M w N N ."SIN M -Ile N OIN — O O W O O O OIO . 0% C m 3 c o c 0 d o Y O W � 6 C N Y c � _ A A " o � e O O H C .0 v 0 C y¢ Q U c c N Y T C Q •E E c ip > M LL cc a' .cc w ti _ E� a> w vvi Z E a °. d e cn 6 U' ._ n o v o O N `d o m :: a o a c 5 E a� c' A D F K U w H U F a <n in f w a vi Y w f l07 F 6 c E E v o � c a � v £ o E v io O q Y U o E aq+ � f 'vi E c w io c J C N U U N C C w 0 k/§ j R �3 #f_� — 22�}k=k§ \$72f2,e0 �28 E `�!! \\ ®- ©/ )\`®§^§\let LQ & ygJE #\»' § § ! VIM MMNOMW.N�MN Ln 0 Ln E \ ACL _ \ k\\\/k I \\k=m \ R �3 #f_� — 22�}k=k§ \$72f2,e0 �28 E `�!! \\ | | ! /f! E ACL _ \ k\\\/k \\k=m \ ( ];% /) z!! 1121 /0 !!!! R �3 #f_� — 22�}k=k§ \$72f2,e0 �28 E `�!! \\ �\ co Ln Iz 49 | | ! /f! ACL _ \ k\\\/k �\ co Ln Iz 49 m c .N o < z O O x Iv 0 0 p N 0 0 0 0 0 n M M M M > > z z c c to 0 C Y C Y U R OI d Q N N Q _ ¢ u e5 E z Q o� E V' v w w 'c o fu '�v�i E 'v .c ' mE A m 3 3 m a¢¢ 6 f 3 m¢¢¢ o H m V N P N W o = 7 O 0 S F fir' I� Q d N 9 O t v N 7 O x A O F u N C = y 0 y o. a� 0 e O C 0i CL 0 E U N a > o V F a a v W z3 c E N m u U IV O oE o E a a E 0 � u k E E v D u_ � m � D U m c .N o < z O O x Iv 0 0 p N 0 0 0 0 0 n M M M M > > z z c c to 0 C Y C Y U R OI d Q N N Q _ ¢ u e5 E z Q o� E V' v w w 'c o fu '�v�i E 'v .c ' mE A m 3 3 m a¢¢ 6 f 3 m¢¢¢ o H m LijH w Lli f o p a a i J d E u c m O O O O O O M O O T N 7 N N .i of th 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 I. O O, O .-i N O O N O N e o o 0 0 v II II p r j II II 0 v V V v W d " v N v v v v > o 0 3 yc >• 0 0 3 c E `A A J O oi' E -A v O J m J Office of Community Planning and Development z. DATE: 02-14-17 e�ipp?N U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development TIME: 16:16 Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 1 PR26 - COBS Financial Summary Report �9 oQ� Program Year 2016 94iy oEVE�' PASCO, WA PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES 01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 439,055.73 02 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 670,436.00 03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL 0.00 04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS 000 05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 0.00 05a CURRENT YEAR SECTION 108 PROGRAM INCOME (FOR SI TYPE) 0.00 06 FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LINE -OF -CREDIT 0.00 06a FUNDS RETURNED TO THE LOCAL CDBG ACCOUNT 0.00 07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE 0.00 08 TOTAL AVAILABLE (SUM, LINES 01-07) 1,109,491.73 PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES 09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER IRAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 404,804.14 10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT 0.00 11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT (LINE 09 + LINE 10) 404,804.14 12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 109,514.27 13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS 0.00 14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES 11-14) 514,318.41 16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 08 - LINE 15) 595,173.32 PART III: LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD 17 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS 0.00 18 EXPENDED FOR LOW/MOD MULTI -UNIT HOUSING 0.00 19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW/MOD ACTIVITIES 402,005.03 20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT 0.00 21 TOTAL LOW/MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 17-20) 402,005.03 22 PERCENT LOW/MOD CREDIT (LINE 21/LINE 11) 99.31% LOW/MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI-YEAR CERTIFICATIONS 23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY) COVERED IN CERTIFICATION PY: PY: PY: 24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW/MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 0.00 25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW/MOD PERSONS 0.00 26 PERCENT BENEFITTO LOW/MOD PERSONS (LINE 25/LINE 24) 0.00% PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE(PS)CAP CALCULATIONS 27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES 94,838 82 28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0.00 29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 4,839.82 30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS 0.00 31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS (LINE 27 + LINE 28 - LINE 29 + LINE 30) 90,000.00 32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 670,436.00 33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 0.00 34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP 0.00 35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP (SUM, LINES 32-34) 670,436.00 36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES (LINE 31/LINE 35) 13.42% PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP 37 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING/ADMINISTRATION 109,514.27 38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 0.00 39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 0.00 40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS 0.00 41 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS (LINE 37 + LINE 38 - LINE 39 +LINE 40) 109,514.27 42 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 670,436.00 43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 0.00 44 ADJUSTMENTTO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP 0.00 45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (SUM, LINES 42-44) 670,436.00 46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVITIES (LINE 41/LINE 45) 16.33% Office of Community Planning and Development DATE: 02-14-17 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development TIME: 16:16 tl Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 2 Il�illfl a` PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report Q�' Program Year 2016 �OqN oeve`'o PASCO, WA LINE 17 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNTTO ENTER ON LINE 17 Report returned no data. LINE 18 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTERON LINE 18 Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS Activity Name Matrix National Activity Code Objective Drawn Amount 2014 7 329 4TH AND PEARL HOUSING INFRASTRUCTURE (VARNEY COURT ARTS) 03K LMH $2,799.11 03K Matrix Code $2,799.11 Total ;2,799.11 LINE 19 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 19 Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS Activity Voucher Activity Name Matrix National Number Code Objective Drawn Amount 2015 5 343 5914959 KURTZMAN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 03F LMA $644.10 2015 5 343 5971501 KURTZMAN PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 03F LMA $125,091.97 03F Matrix Code $125,736.07 2014 7 334 5914959 SYLVESTER NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 03L LMA $591.58 2014 7 334 5971501 SYLVESTER NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 03L LMA $82,126.90 2014 7 334 5995358 SYLVESTER NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 03L LMA $51.15 2014 7 334 6003628 SYLVESTER NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 03L LMA $29.23 03L Matrix Code $82,798.86 2016 2 349 5971501 CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $15,003.00 2016 2 349 5995358 CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $3,334.00 2016 2 349 6003628 CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $1,663.00 2016 2 350 5971501 MLK CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $15,003.00 2016 2 350 5995358 MLK CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $3,334.00 2016 2 350 6003628 MLK CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $1,663.00 2016 2 352 6003628 YMCA MLK COMMUNITY CENTER REC PROGRAM 05 LMA $20,000.00 OS Matrix Code $60,000.00 2016 2 351 5971501 SENIOR CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05A LMC $22,500.00 2016 2 351 5995358 SENIOR CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05A LMC $5,000.00 2016 2 351 6003628 SENIOR CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05A LMC $2,500.00 OSA Matrix Code $30,000.00 2014 2 332 5914959 PASCO SPECIALTY KITCHEN PROJECTOR INSTALLATION 05H LMC $4,839.82 OSH Matrix Code $4,839.82 2014 4 325 6003628 CATHOLIC FAMILY VOLUNTEER CHORE SERVICES 14A LMH $430.76 2014 4 326 6003628 COMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT MINOR REHAB 14A LMH PROGRAM $1,070.21 14A Matrix Code $1,500.97 2014 3 324 5971501 FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 14E LMA $61.58 2016 3 353 5995358 FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 14E LMA $233.95 2016 3 353 6003628 FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 14E LMA $131.15 2016 3 355 5971501 COMMERCIAL KITCHEN FACILITY IMPROVEMENT 14E LMJ $235.61 2016 3 355 5995358 COMMERCIAL KITCHEN FACILITY IMPROVEMENT 14E LMJ $43.96 2016 3 355 6003628 COMMERCIAL KITCHEN FACILITY IMPROVEMENT 14E LMJ $446.24 2016 3 356 5971501 COMMERCIAL KITCHEN FACADE IMPROVEMENT 14E LMA $116.92 14E Matrix Code $1,269.41 2016 6 358 5971501 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 15 LMA $36,000.00 2016 6 358 5995358 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 15 LMA $8,000.00 2016 6 358 6003628 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 15 LMA $4,000.00 35 Matrix Code $48,000.00 2016 3 354 5971501 PASCO SPECIALTY KITCHEN 18B LMJ $37,616.86 2016 3 354 5995358 PASCO SPECIALTY KITCHEN 18B LMJ $5,505.82 2016 3 354 6003628 PASCO SPECIALTY KITCHEN 18B LMJ $4,737.22 18B Matrix Code $47,859.90 LINE 27 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 27 Plan Year Office of Community Planning and Development DATE. 02-14-17 Activity Name U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development TIME. 16.16 2016 2 349 5971501 CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 i@ ? s, Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 3 349 5995358 CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST O5 LMA $3,334.00 2016 PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report 349 6003628 �c 4< Program Year 2016 $1,663.00 2016 2 PASCO , WA 5971501 MILK CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS Activity Voucher Activity Name Matrix National 2016 2 Number Code Objective Drawn Amount Total LMA $3,334.00 $402,005.03 LINE 27 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 27 Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS Activity Voucher Number Activity Name Matrix Code National Objective Drawn Amount 2016 2 349 5971501 CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $15,003.00 2016 2 349 5995358 CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST O5 LMA $3,334.00 2016 2 349 6003628 CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $1,663.00 2016 2 350 5971501 MILK CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $15,003.00 2016 2 350 5995358 MILK CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $3,334.00 2016 2 350 6003628 MLK CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05 LMA $1,663.00 2016 2 352 6003628 YMCA MILK COMMUNITY CENTER REG PROGRAM O5 LMA $20,000.00 05 Matrix Code $60,000.00 2016 2 351 5971501 SENIOR CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05A LMC $22,500.00 2016 2 351 5995358 SENIOR CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05A LMC $5,000.00 2016 2 351 6003628 SENIOR CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST 05A LMC $2,500.00 OSA Matrix Code $30,000.00 2014 2 332 5914959 PASCO SPECIALTY KITCHEN PROJECTOR INSTALLATION 05H LMC $4,839.82 OSH Matrix Code $4,839.82 Total $94,839.82 LINE 37 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 37 Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS Activity Voucher Activity Name Matrix National Number Code Objective Drawn Amount 2016 1 348 5971501 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 21A $81,658.59 2016 1 348 5995358 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 21A $17,110.46 2016 1 348 6003628 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 21A $10,745.22 21A Matrix Code $109,514.27 Total $109,514.27 O 0 N f0 d l6 C O) � O � a U rnQ C E N OM CL m ams N J N U o } _ O d O d O C O pa > U E y m Q cm m m o C,4 a ti 0 H 0 o e d 0 0 M N O W O O � co 7 I V CD O) O) d E a O N V d N O a m o V r c d � E b E E E c d Ei p O D. m (Cp N 7 O C d M � w 0 O E � O O C a U N N Q £ c LL U @ Co O O Y p aa-(Di°- O N w= C C U d _ c S � k2 p d O d } E vi0� E a O U m U O 0 N f0 d l6 C O) � O � a U rnQ C E N OM CL m ams N J N U o } _ O d O d O C O pa > U E y m Q cm m m o C,4 a ti 0 H 0 o e o 0 0 M N O V O O � co 7 O) V CD O) O) d E OJ O N V W N O a m o v r N O M O) O 00 N R W O 7 O) V CD d E m N M W N M a m o v rn v c N N U b c E c N O N � C C C d E m d a o c a � c E c d p O m (Cp N > w C d O E � — a U N N Q £ c LL U @ Co m aa-(Di°- w= a N O | E Eo s . § 0IL \±E j I/¢< . �\\}(\\ +i§�&2 ! § /;2£�� K ( K I e,- 'ra7� f 0 . ■ /\/k ,s E In Im cc r =�\ E .. « « & ; sam 0 | ! § ( K K ( K O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 o 0 0 0 O) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V N N m 0 d E 0 S d m 11 � d y O f E a d A j d a0 o 2 s o q E O F Oil R O N _ ` O M O, II V v E 0 o r V u x 77 o 0 0 e o 0 V N N m W W W D r d O O a` c E R a T L !n W E w m U d L E J z O O M O O O a Y3 � rn to a) 'O tri 7 c mcu W ri j M 75 C N L N N yQ)a C14 _N E w 0 3 m C N J y o 2 C 'E C 0 :D rn c j U a a (D a) W <a a o L co E E a Y3 to a) 'O tri 7 c mcu W Nm j M 75 C N L N N yQ)a _N E w 0 3 c E ° � o C 0 o T w L O0 R 3 d -OD To N R a Ria C = T a) - c C N'0 = V M O) c E Q R N R u '0 o R L-0 E a) -, v Y d R U L .0 C C 00 C C N C s a (U E M Z o X 0 O`N mN d N > O O tpp N w O p o N + 0.0 N O V C C N U >_ Q. Rio CL ° a)Cm pa3 E wE ECL c aa) a) R L C y y i O E L i E O R 4 m i G w 0 R C C i N a) .a)O R r R Y 15 O Y Et>o-0 R Y U "2 R cu Y '0d R N L1 O ejN to .� (u 3: 0 Y R t0 a) al .V N a) L R R R 0 Y C C L -0 \ a .nE yyQs T c V R N u o C c naafi o v OL v$ a C E o N a cu W:6 m cu -a CL 0 L a' cu C et E C o R o N R O) 3 > N C "Vv J > N VR O a)=p N H N C Ln y >a)M D a) LaN L R --Q a L O CU ov 0.0 OL > HM d d -aiC E Y o E ax ao oEmRR v�d>v a 3=j`= c C(V E 00�'�oSR a) � o E I m Ooa a) Oo o LESS OL ° a, >o m a Y � � Z, E N N = L a C N J V O O L Oi w Cw a1 �.i > o n:>L N c o Z' W 'ii m C N t a) .0 0 C u a c c R 'E N fO R a) Q N c mE E am � a y E _0 c cm ma E vo O a 0 oO=owm -0ci)i o d R m L > fYa Y N+-' C C a) > 0 a) C R C l Y O i O O 'O N T c CU > :8 C L N D N o m N a>i E �.c _ w m Liia> a o _V EaRL' J R N aai 3 C R C R 7a N a) C a N L > Y a) O a a) R Y mn O Q in a) V l0L R L L Y O)Y L O nL J J Y J LL 2 .-I N M N 'O S] C tUtpp In i 0 U 8