Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-21-2016 Planning Commission Meeting PacketPLANNING COMMISSION - AGENDA REGULAR MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER: II. ROLL CALL: III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: V. OLD BUSINESS: A. Preliminary Plat B. Rezone VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 7:00 P.M. Declaration of Quorum June 16, 2016 July 21, 2016 Preliminary Plat for Columbia Terrace (Big Creek Land Company) (MF# PP 2016-001) Rezone from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to "O" (Office) (Anidas Guerera) (MF# Z 2016-003) A. Special Permit Special Permit to locate a student housing complex (Columbia Basin College) (MF# SP 2016-008) B. Zoning Determination Zoning Determination to establish zoning for the Barker Annexation (MF# ZD 2016-0031 C. Block Grant 2017 Community Development Block Grant Fund Allocations (MF# BGAP 2016-003) D. Block Grant 2017 HOME Fund Allocations (MF# BGAP 2016-004) VII. WORKSHOP: VIII. OTHER BUSINESS: IX. ADJOURNMENT: This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.com/psetvIive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact staff for assistance. REGULAR MEETING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:OOpm by Chairwoman Khan. POSITION MEMBERS PRESENT No. 1 Tanya Bowers No. 2 No. 3 Paul Mendez No. 4 Alecia Greenaway No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 Zahra Khan No. 8 Pam Bykonen No. 9 Gabriel Portugal rA;J4 AZ7-1 [03Dre)A1 31aDlk*--f MEMBERS ABSENT Kurt Lukins Joe Cruz Loren Polk June 16, 2016 Chairwoman Khan read a statement about the appearance of fairness for hearings on land use matters. Commissioner Bowers recused herself from public hearing item B: Rezone - Rezone from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to "O" (Office) due to friendship with the applicant. Chairwoman Khan declared that that on public hearing item A: Preliminary Plat - Columbia Terrace, that she lives adjacent to the plat but as long as there were no objections she could hear the case. There were no objections to Chairwoman Khan hearing the case. Chairwoman Khan then asked the audience if there were any objections based on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness question regarding the items to be discussed this evening. There were no objections. ADMINISTERING THE OATH: Chairwoman Khan explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or affirmation. Chairwoman Khan swore in all those desiring to speak. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen that the minutes dated May 19, 2016 be approved. The motion passed unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: A. Special Permit Location of a Car Lot in a C-1 (Retail Business) Zone (Adriana Robledo) (MF# SP 2016-006) Chairwoman Khan read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. -1- Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the special permit application for the location of a car lot in a C-1 zone. He asked the Commissioner's to review the approval conditions that were handed out prior to the meeting as they were left out of the mailed staff report. Aside from the addition of the approval conditions, there were no changes to the staff report since the prior meeting. Commissioner Greenaway asked if the applicant was aware of the approval conditions and if they approved of the conditions. Mr. McDonald stated that the applicants likely have not seen approval conditions since they were not included in the packet that was posted or mailed. Rick White, Community 8s Economic Development Director, approached the applicant and explained the approval conditions. Adriana Robledo, the applicant, stated that she agreed with the conditions. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, moved to adopt the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the June 16, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit for the location of an auto sales lot at 609 West Lewis Street, with conditions as listed in the June 16, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat for Columbia Terrace (Big Creek Land Company) IMF# PP 2016-0011 Chairwoman Khan read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the preliminary plat application for Columbia Terrace. On June 1st, 160 acres located directly north of Power Line Road and east of Broadmoor Boulevard were annexed into the City of Pasco. The developer that was instrumental in annexing this property has filed an application for a preliminary plat for the western 40 acres of that 160 acre piece that was annexed. The developer has filed the preliminary plat under the planned density development regulations which are slightly different than a regular plat. Under the planned density development standards, the developer is allowed to mix the lots, creating some smaller lots and offsetting them with larger lots. This is a process used by most of the subdivisions developed in the I-182 Corridor. By mixing the lot sizes the developer can offer a wide variety of homes in the same subdivision. With the R-1 zoning that the Planning Commission recommended with the annexation that occurred on June 1, 2016, this property could be developed for 185 lots. The developer has chosen to develop it with 144 lots with ranging lot sizes from 6,000 square feet to 15,000 square feet, with 9,000 square feet being the average lot size. -2- The plat provides connections to the transportation grid with two access points on Broadmoor Boulevard and one on Power Line Road. As with other subdivisions that back up to major streets, the developer will be required to build a block wall and provide landscaping on both streets. The agricultural land to the east is owned by the Pasco School District and the assumption is that there will be a middle school placed on that 40 acre site. Staff is suggesting the Planning Commission recommend that along that boundary line there should be a common fence for aesthetics — not necessarily a block wall but something that is similar the whole length so that there is consistency. Provided in the staff report are the necessary conditions and findings of fact for the Planning Commission to review. Commissioner Bowers asked for clarification on the three access points to the proposed preliminary plat. Commissioner Portugal asked if there was only a need for fencing on the eastern boundary of the proposed plat. Mr. McDonald answered that the developer will have to build a block wall along the southern boundary of Power Line Road and the western boundary along Broadmoor Boulevard. On the east side next to the School District property the City is just recommending a common fence, whether it's vinyl, cedar or whatever. The northern property line will back up eventually to future residential development so there won't be a need for fencing there. Commissioner Mendez asked if there are traffic impacts. Mr. McDonald responded that the developer will be required through the Engineering platting process to widen both streets and place the necessary curb and gutter and turn radius on the corner of Broadmoor Boulevard and Power Line Road. Each lot will be required to pay the $709 traffic impact fee which goes into the traffic impact fund that will fund future traffic improvements in that corridor area. Chairwoman Khan asked if that fund would include bike lanes. Mr. McDonald stated that they would be wide enough for bike lanes but he would have to check with the engineers. It is unknown at this time. Cliff Mort, 1950 W. Bellerive Lane, Coeur d'Alene, ID spoke on behalf of his application. This is a neighborhood that Big Creek Land Company has been working on for a while. They have developed properties in this corridor since 2000. This particular neighborhood will be similar to Broadmoor Terrace but this will be bigger and allows for the planned density development. Some of the lots will be large enough to allow for shops to be built. He briefly discussed his plans for the project. Commissioner Bowers asked Mr. Mort to explain the home stores that he was talking about and also to clarify where Columbia Place is located. Mr. McDonald responded that Columbia Place is located by Maya Angelou Elementary School on Road 84. -3- Mr. Mort clarified that there wouldn't be "stores" on residential lots. What he meant was some of the lots will be large enough for shops/garages. Chairwoman Khan asked if Big Creek Land Company developed the land to the north of Maya Angelou Elementary School. Mr. Mort answered that it actually Neighborhood Incorporated, which was a company that he owned at the time. Chairwoman Khan discussed that shared fencing with the proposed School District site. She asked if they would consider a break in the fence for access between the two sites. Mr. Mort responded that he would certainly consider that, however, he has noticed in the past that the School District hasn't wanted that. Commissioner Portugal asked how far the nearest park is located to the proposed plat. Chairwoman Khan responded that Maya Angelou is approximately 1 mile away and there is a city park attached to that. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Bowers discussed the density north of Power Line Road and looking into parks and commercial zoning. She asked what the plans are for property north of Power Line Road and any additions along Broadmoor Boulevard. Mr. McDonald answered that north of Power Line Road above the urban growth boundary goes up to the end of Mr. Mort's proposed subdivision. Right now all urban growth is supposed to stop at the end of his proposal and north of that would be lots at least 20 acres in size. That could change next year during the Comprehensive Plan Update and more than likely the line will be moved. The Comprehensive Plan since 1992 has included all of this area as low density residential. R-1 zoning is within that density classification. What Mr. Mort is proposing is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As for parks, typically when a development is at least 160 acres the City will require or request the developer provide 5 acres for a park site. But for a 40 acre development, that is too small so Mr. Mort will be required to pay the park impact fee which is $1,386 per home. That fee goes into a fund that will eventually be used by the City to buy and develop park land in the general area. Part of the impact fee is also set aside for a community park. The Parks Division is currently in the process of looking for areas in the community now for a 30 acre site for a community park that could serve this area. As for commercial development in this area, the Comprehensive Plan has identified locations near the interchange. Nearly 145 acres of land was rezoned around the interchange for future commercial development and the City is in the process of working with the owner of the sand dune property and an urban designer to come up with a plan for that area. Commissioner Portugal asked if Broadmoor Boulevard is the same as Road 100. Mr. McDonald responded that Broadmoor Boulevard is Road 100. C:ID Chairwoman Khan asked if the proposed plat would be served by Franklin PUD or by Big Bend Electric. Mr. McDonald answered that it would be served by Big Bend Electric. Chairwoman Khan asked if there was intent from the School District or from the City at this time to place a park adjacent to this proposed plat. Mr. McDonald replied that he is unsure at this time where the community park will be located. The site the Mr. Mort is developing is 40 acres which is too small to require the community park. Commissioner Mendez asked if the developer could build a neighborhood park for reduced park impact fees. Mr. McDonald answered that when developers do that if the development has 160 acres, making it more cost effective to develop the park themselves but anything smaller and it is more cost effective for the developer to pay the impact fees. Commissioner Greenway moved, seconded by Commissioner Bykonen, to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and set July 2, 2016 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. The motion passed unanimously. B. Rezone Rezone from R-1 ILow Density Residentiall to "O" (Office) (Anidas Guereral (MF# Z 2016-0031 Chairwoman Khan read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the rezone application from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to "O" (Office). This rezone is a situation the Planning Commission has seen several times where the land use was established a long time and the zoning does not match the land use. The application is to rezone the property to "O" (Office) which is what is currently being used on the property and has been since prior to 1950. The analysis in the staff report describes that professional offices used to be an allowed use within residential districts but that provision was removed from the zoning code in the early 1980's. The office use itself has retained its non -conforming status. It has always been used as an office, never converted to residential. Any owner would have difficulties insuring, financing or refinancing this property due to its non- conforming nature, which is why the applicant has requested to amend the zoning to reflect its actual use. The property is in an area of transition and is recognized in the Comprehensive Plan as such area. Anides Guerera, 4418 Providence Lane, spoke on behalf of his rezone application. He discussed potential financial difficulties if this rezone application does not get approved. Since it has been used as an office since 1959 he believes it should be approved. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. -5- Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Mendez, to close the hearing on the proposed rezone and set July 21, 2016 as the date for deliberations and the development of a recommendation for the City Council. The motion passed unanimously with Commissioner Bowers recused. OTHER BUSINESS: Rick White, Community & Development Director, discussed upcoming applications for the Planning Commission. In July there will be a public hearing for 2017 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. This is an annual process. Also in July there will be a presentation from a consultant regarding the Broadmoor Master Plan. Mr. White asked the Commissioners to consider beginning the meeting at 6:00 p.m. instead of 7:00 p.m. in order to start the presentation early. Mr. White also discussed the Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the current Comprehensive Plan was passed out to the Commissioners prior to the meeting. He advised them that they should get familiar with the plan as the Comprehensive Plan Update will be coming up. With no further discussion or business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, David McDonald, City Planner W REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2016-001 HEARING DATE: 6/16/2016 ACTION DATE: 7/21/2016 APPLICANT: Big Creek Land Company 1950 W. Bellerive Ln. Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Columbia Terrace, 144 -Lots (Planned Density Development Plat) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: SW Quarter of the SW Quarter of Section 5, T9N, R29E, WM General Location: The N/E corner of Broadmoor Blvd. & Power Line Rd. Property Size: 40.88Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 144 single-family lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 6,010 ft2 to 15,343 ft' Average Lot Square Footage: 9,075 ft' 2. ACCESS: The property will have access from Broadmoor Blvd. and Power Line Rd. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer service are in Broadmoor Boulevard to the south. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (low -Density Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: AP -20 - Agriculture (County Zoning) SOUTH: R-1 - Single -Family EAST: R-1 - Vacant/Agriculture (Future school site)) WEST R-1 & RS -1 -Vacant S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for low-density residential development. According to the Comprehensive Plan, low-density residential development means 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future land use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II, page 17) encourages development of lands designated for low-density residential uses when or where: sewer is available, the location is suitable for home sites, and there is a market demand for new home sites Policy H -1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU -2 encourages the maintenance of established I neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. ANALYSIS The project site is located immediately east of Broadmoor Boulevard and north of Burns Road. The site is relatively flat with a few undulating dunes and slopes slightly from the north to the south. Thirty-four acres of the site is currently being farmed and about 6 acres are vacant. The site was initially designated for low-density residential development under the 1982 Comprehensive Plan and again under the 1995 Plan and the updated Plan of 2007. The R-1 (Low -Density Residential) zoning was established in when the property was annexed on June 1, 2016. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the site into 144 lots through the Planned Density Development process. The Planned Density Development process was designed to provide a degree of flexibility for residential development in the City. Essentially the under lying zoning is used to determine the number of building lots permitted within a proposed plat. Lots can to be varied in size, some smaller and some larger than the minimum (7,200) specified by R-1 zoning. However the total number of lots cannot exceed what the zoning permits under the minimum requirements. In this case R-1 zoning will permit 185 lots on the site. The developer is proposing only 144 lots ranging in size from 6,010 square feet to 15,343 square feet. The average lot size will be 9,075 square feet. Most of the subdivisions within the I-182 Corridor were developed under the Planned Density process. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed Plat contains 144 residential lots. The lots vary in size from 6,010 square feet to 15,343 square feet. The proposal is consistent with the density requirements of the R-1 zoning on the site. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets which will be dedicated. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer lines are located in Broadmoor Boulevard to the south of Burns Road. The developer will be responsible for extending utilities into the Plat. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan calls for a 30 - inch sewer interceptor to be located in Burns Road. The interceptor will not be 2 installed in time to serve the proposed plat therefore the developer will be installing a temporary line that will connect to the existing sewer line in Nottingham Drive. Upon installation of the interceptor the temporary line to Nottingham Drive will be abandoned. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not diminish the buildable area of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of less than 300 feet on residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets. The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street. STREET NAMES: The proposed street names will need to be modified to avoid conflict with existing street names in the City. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines as a part of the infrastructure improvements. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact": Prevent Overcrowding: Density requirements of the R-1 zone are designed to address overcrowding concerns. The Comprehensive Plan suggests the property in question be developed with 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre. The proposed Plat has a density of approximately 3.5 units per acre. No more than 40 percent of each lot is permitted to be covered with structures per the R-1 standards. 3 Parks Opens Space/Schools: City parks are located in Columbia Place and Island Estates to the east and south. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new dwelling unit at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The Plat is laid out for single- family development as identified in the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density permitted under the Comprehensive Plan is 5 dwelling units per acre. The developer is proposing a density of 3.5 units per acre. The proposed development will include improvements to both Burns Road and Broadmoor Boulevard. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to current City standards and to the standards of the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of all intersection will be installed with the construction of the road improvements Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the Plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This Preliminary Plat contains 144 residential building lots, providing an opportunity for the construction of 144 new dwelling units in Pasco. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitations, building height restrictions and building setbacks will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The streets through and adjoining the Plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by Burns Road and Broadmoor Boulevard. The Preliminary Plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review. (The discussion under "Safe Travel" above applies to this section also.) Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates the Plat site for low-density residential development. Policies of the 2 Comprehensive Plan encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings: • The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. • The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within the Urban Growth Boundaries. • The site is relatively flat and slopes slightly from the north to the south. • The site is currently under agricultural production with the exception of 6 acres at the corner of Burns Road and Broadmoor Boulevard. • The site is not considered a critical area, a mineral resource area or a wet land. • The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for low-density residential development. • Low-density residential development is described in the Comprehensive Plan as two to five dwelling units per acre. • The site is zoned R-1 (Low -Density Residential). • The site was zoned R-1 when it was annexed in June of 2016. • The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the advancement of programs that promote home ownership and development of a variety of residential densities and housing types. • The Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the interconnection of neighborhood streets to provide for the disbursement of traffic. • The interconnection of neighborhood streets is necessary for utility connections (looping) and the provision of emergency services. • Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 1,440 vehicle trips per day. • The current traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the 1-182 Corridor when warranted. • The current park impact fee is $1,386 per dwelling unit. The fee can be reduced by 58 percent if a developer dedicates a five acre park site to the City. The dedication of a fully constructed park reduces the fee by 93 percent. • RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved. 5 • The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012. • Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools. • Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses. Except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements. • All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. • All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. • The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner that does not injure, annoy or endanger the comfort and repose of other property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including houses. • Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: 11 (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to Big Bend Electric, the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable and Ben -Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110.City parks are located in the subdivisions to the west and southwest of the site. All new developments participate in establishing parks through the payment of park fees at the time of permitting. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed Plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for the looping of utilities and interconnectivity of streets as supported in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision will provide arterial street improvements along Burns Road and Broadmoor Boulevard. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low-density residential development. Low-density residential development is described as 2 to 5 dwelling units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Plan encourages the promotion of a variety of residential densities and suggests the community should support the advancement of programs encouraging home ownership. The Transportation Element of the Plan suggests major streets should be beautified with trees and landscaping. The Plan also encourages the interconnection of local streets for inter -neighborhood travel for public safety as well as providing for traffic disbursement. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e.: school impact fees are paid.) (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. The proposed Plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to insure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will insure the public use and interest are served. TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The developer shall install a common "Estate Type" fence six -feet in height along the east and south line of the plat as a part of the infrastructure improvements associated with the plat. The fence must be constructed of masonry block. A fencing detail must be included on the subdivision construction drawings. Consideration must be given to a reasonable vision triangle at the intersection of streets. The City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep. These fencing requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the final plat(s). A concrete mow strip shall be installed under any common fence as directed by the City Parks 8 Division and shall be approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. 4. A common solid fence must be installed along the eastern boundary of the proposed plat adjacent to the school site. 5. Excess right-of-way along Burns Road and Broadmoor Boulevard must be landscaped. Said landscaping shall include irrigation, turf and trees. Trees shall be planted at 50 foot intervals. The species of the trees will be determined by the Parks Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department prior to installation. Water usage for City right-of-way landscaping shall come from a source by the City of Pasco with the connection and meter fees paid for by the developer. 6. The developer/ builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $475 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. The City shall not accept maintenance responsibility for the landscaping abutting said streets until such time as all fees are collected for each phase that abut said streets. 7. Lots abutting Burns Road and Broadmoor Boulevard shall not have direct access to said streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of deed restrictions or statements on the face of the final plat(s). 8. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10 -foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 9. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". MOTION: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the July 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Columbia Terrace, with conditions as listed in the July 21, 2016 staff report. 0 m .. rvoiarvwsrM urvnoarvnaarae'wsreeouo Rail w _ � �a-e rvo�swaensnavuivrvs3ad ��� � 30t/ GU b EM= p RAJ gga E a »o.e.wsuaa a $ EVICTOR it] I a �V ] ° W on con I -, -s i m• y° 3 E EES_. �- ]° a3„az§�a i N ° k_ ]S 3! ]S K q i! x! h a S gill Pi e wrona»oaaoravorms v u IL M « _ ros R =�S e S, _ :�S ai•. oils EVICTOR it] I a �V ] ° W Qo on con I -, -s i m• y° 3 - �- ]° a E1 i N ° a• �R ]S 3! ]S ][ q i! x! h a S S Oi ] Pi e wrona»oaaoravorms v u IL M « _ ` iS R =�S e S, _ :�S ai•. oils i- �ti, �[pa 3S >Wan� N.J. Qo on con I -, -s i m• y° 3 - �- ]° a E1 i N ° a• �R •w i. I Aye i L mj218 wrona»oaaoravorms � �' >Wan� N.J. ZOQ� E I � ° a• @� RS ° S1 Po i1 R A[ R. qi a Fi 1 I F a °. Po i+ Y B+ q �z UllW �ZG � arvnnvn]rxvoe mi _w F � � I � q O� h 0.0 p ]i I _ _ ___r I __ ,' -�-� I- f-- ➢�-- __j _�I r C' p .e •C LI kl ° ei p « I 33 S 3 !E ���b I •� x 3; i � ,i a� k � � �i = =i � of I v 3 I y ]- y ji y )' F I f, a 3S R• { u, :. y i • b i I -, -s i m• y° 3 - �- ]° a E1 i N ° a• �R •w i. I Aye i it I wrona»oaaoravorms ld �qo POA = o x S La mmwmm��. - "If , , ¥�2© 11 :ƒ : • 11 i a ;:� :It��i���,. �ll 4jy � �IF�. � C l t ���k t ��S '. \(� X 1 �d-� �q :1y 4 .,� r 1! REPORT TO PLANNING MASTER FILE NO: Z 2016-003 APPLICANT: City of Pasco HEARING DATE: 6/16/2016 PO Box 293 ACTION DATE: 7/21/2016 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: REZONE: Rezone from "R-1" (Low -Density Residential) to "O" (Office) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lots 14-16 Block 11, Helms 2nd Addition General Location: 1731 W. Clark Street. Property Size: 10,018 sq. ft. 2. ACCESS: The site has access from W. Clark Street and 18+b Avenue. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal sewer and water lines currently serve the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site contains one and a half lots and is currently zoned R-1 (Retail Business). One office building and a small parking occupy the property. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-1 - Single -Family SOUTH: C-1 - Commercial Strip building EAST: "O" - Single -Family WEST: C-1 - Value Inn Motel 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The property is in an area of transition between a residential and commercial land use designation. In transition areas properties can be zoned to match either of the identified land uses. Goal ED -1 encourages the City to maintain economic development as an important and ongoing City initiative. ED -2-13 suggests there ought to be a wide range of commercial and industrial uses strategically located within the City to support local and regional needs. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. 1 ANALYSIS The owner of 1731 W. Clark Street has applied to change the zoning classification of his two parcels from R-1 to "O". The current zoning for the property was established prior to 1950. The property is developed with a professional office that has been located on the property since 1959. The office building was used as a chiropractic office for many years and is currently an accounting office. The early zoning codes for the City permitted the location of office uses in residential zones for physicians, dentists and other professionals. These offices however were supposed to be located within the professional provider's home. The provisions for professional service offices in residential zoning districts were removed from the code in 1982. The building in question was originally built as an office and was never a home. How it was approved for a building permit in 1959 is unclear. However it was generally accepted as a permitted use for many years. The permitted use status of the building changed in 1982 when professional offices were deleted as an accessory use in residential districts. Since 1982 professional offices have been considered a non -conforming uses in residential zones. The office function on the property has changed slightly over the years but the non- conforming status has remained secured. The fact that the office use of the property is considered non -conforming has been problematic for the property owners over the years. The non -conforming status creates difficulties for financing, refinancing and obtaining insurance. As a result the current property owner is seeking a rezone to bring the zoning and land use into conformance. The properties to the south and west of the site are zoned C-1 and developed with commercial uses. The old law office (now a day care center) at the northwest corner of 181h and Bonneville is also zoned C-1. The office property in question provides a buffer between the more intense commercial uses to the south and west from the less intense residential uses to the east and northeast. Office zoning is commonly used to create buffer areas between commercial businesses and residences and that is one of the purposes for the Office District. Another issue to consider with this rezone request is the fact the office building has been located on the property for 57 years alongside the adjoining homes. The homes were built in 1949. There is a long history of compatibility between the homes and the office building. The proposed rezone supports that history. 2 The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC. 25.88.030. The criteria are listed below as follows: 1. The date the existing zone became effective: The current R-1 zoning classification was established over 65 years ago. The existing office building was built on the property in 1959 about 10 years after the adjoin houses were built. 2. The changed conditions, which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: The office building has been a part of the neighborhood character for over five decades. In 1982 the zoning code was amended to eliminate offices from residential zones. The most significant changes in the neighborhood have been the intense redevelopment of the C-1 property directly south of the office building and the deterioration of the old Apple Inn directly to the west of the office building. 3. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general welfare: Changing the zoning classification of the site to "O" will support current efforts to maintain and improve the existing office building. Non -conforming buildings often fall into a state of disrepair resulting from code limitations on the amount of improvements that are allowed to be undertaken. The general welfare of the neighborhood would be supported by having the building well maintained. 4. The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property and the Comprehensive Plan: Rezoning the property will have a positive long term impact on the value and character of the neighborhood because investments will be permitted to maintain and enhance the value of the property. The site is in an area of transition on the land use map of the Comprehensive Plan and can be rezoned to "O". 5. The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted: Under the current zoning classification the property owner has a very difficult time selling or refinancing his property. Often properties with non -conforming zoning suffer deferred maintenance because owners become disinterested in investing in maintenance costs. This can lead to blighted sites which may lead to economic disinvestment in the immediate vicinity. It is in the best interest of the City to protect against the establishment and spread of blighting conditions. 3 STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is currently zoned R-1 (Low -Density Residential). 2. Zoning regulation prior to the 1950's allowed professional offices in residential zones. 3. The office on the property in question was permitted and built in 1959. 4. The building was originally used for medical purposes. 5. The office building on the site was built 10 years after the homes on the lots to the east and northeast. 6. The office building has been part of the neighborhood character for 57 years. 7. The use and management of the office building has not generated complaints from adjoin residential property owners. 8. In 1982 all authorization for the location of professional offices in residential zones was removed from the zoning regulations. 9. All office buildings in R-1 zones became non -conforming in 1982. 10. The current R-1 zoning makes it difficult for property owners to obtain financing or refinancing to purchase, repair or upkeep the property. 11. The office building provides a buffer between the nearby homes and the more intense commercial properties to the south and west. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a zoning amendment the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.88.060. The criteria are as follows: 1. The proposal is in accordance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Rezoning the property to "O" would bring the property into conformance with the land use map of the Comprehensive Plan and with Goal ED -1 that encourages the City to maintain economic development as an important and ongoing City initiative. 2 2. There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole. The proposal has merit and value to the community because the rezone will enable an existing office building to be maintained where it has been located for 57 years and will ensure resources can be made available for the long term upkeep of the building and prevent it from becoming a blight to the neighborhood. 3. Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. There are no identifiable potential impacts in need of mitigation by way of conditioning. 4. A Concomitant Agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. A concomitant agreement does not need to accompany this rezone. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the July 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council rezone Lots 14-16 Block 11, Helms 2nd Addition from "R-1 to "O". 5 7 ; 3AV H1L 6 I win p��a... •.." rm 3/ \ V HA L C)ct a ,I '-1J I illg� 1 r�I 1 CO � ! . . __. • ISI - .. F k •.." rm 3/ \ V HA L C)ct a ,I '-1J I illg� 1 r�I 1 CO � ! . . __. • ISI - .. F F W Z N 3 and H1L 6 r d •� U) Q•- J L U � O � o � LU V C M DAV H18L � O 0 LU CO w O d z m O .X W Z N 3 3AV HiZL M ct V r � M J U O W Q 3AV Hie M O O N U w CID CO 44/ z ' z aA m r c � N N � I �JJ � ' •� a O O _ n ,<_ J � '' i, � ' � ` � ;t ' i_ n : i. � i yi •n `' i �. {5' � '- � •'Z,'i f. ' `, jj� f q Y; y {\ i C � r i l M! ! R i 1 �� ti �l y �� <} t� x y r .]� � `; �t t � "€Vti s i x' �� h i ro{ { rrrG � ix l {+.1 `,! � Y... V �� \� Y VV � � i � V �� � ..V •:�y�„ �' L�� •SS ';� �j:^ `i� '- w? � �.'�^ REPORT TO PLANNING MASTER FILE NO: (MF# ZD2016-003) ACTION DATE: 7/21/2016 APPLICANT: City of Pasco PO Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 REQUEST: Develop zoning recommendation for the Barker Annexation Area. 1) AREA ID: Area Size # of Dwellings Population Barker Annexation 119 acres 1 2 2) UTILITIES: A City water line is located in Burns Road to the south of the annexation area. 3) LAND USE AND ZONING: The proposed annexation area is currently zoned AP -20 under the County zoning and is being farmed. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: RR -5 - Byers Neighborhood (County) SOUTH: RT, RS -1 & R-1 - Vacant EAST: AP -20 - Farm Fields (County) WEST: AP -20 - Farm Fields (County) 4) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the annexation area for low-density single-family development. 5) ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. ANALYSIS The Barker Annexation area contains 119 acres and is located directly north of Burns Road and west of Broadmoor Boulevard. The property contains a farm field, one house and related out buildings. In determining the most appropriate zoning for the annexation area the Planning Commission needs to consider the existing land uses, development patterns, policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the land use designations of the land use map. The Planning Commission also needs to be guided by 1 the criteria in PMC 25.88.060 (as discussed below) in developing a zoning recommendation. The proposed annexation area has been identified as a low-density residential area in the City's Comprehensive Plan for about 35 years. Nearby properties in the City (including the Mullen Annexation Area) are zoned R-1 Low Density Residential. The Sharma Annexation area adjacent to the Barker Annexation area was also zoned low-density residential. The residential development to the west in the County is zoned RS -20 due to the lack of a sanitary sewer system in the area. The proposed annexation area is within the City's service area as identified in the Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plans. Both of these plans based future services need within the annexation area on the low-density land use designation identified in the land use map of the Comprehensive Plan. Upon annexation the City will be responsible for providing all municipal services to the area. These services include fire and police services. Currently the nearest fire station is located on Road 68 to the north of Argent Road. As the annexation area develops along with other vacant properties around the Broadmoor Boulevard and Burns Road intersection, it will become increasing difficult for the Fire Department to meet the standard six minute response time. The City currently has an agreement with the owner of the "Sand Dunes" property (southwest corner of Broadmoor and Power Line) to acquire five acres to the west of Broadmoor Boulevard that can accommodate a fire station. A fire station in this area of the community is still a number of years away. The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC 25.88.030. The criteria are listed below as follows: 1. The changed conditions in the vicinity which warrant other or additional zoning: • The property is located within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. • The property in question may be annexed to the City of Pasco. • The property is located west of Broadmoor Boulevard and north of Burns Road. • Broadmoor Boulevard has been extended north to Dent Road. • Burns Road (formerly Power Line Road) has been extended from Road 68 to the Columbia River passed the south boundary of the proposed annexation area and Burns Road has been extended to the west. • With the exception of approximately 65 lots, the residential subdivisions to the south of the proposed annexation area are fully built out. 2 • Archer Estates, Goose Hollow, Quail Bluff, Pelican Pointe, Spencer Estates and Eagle Crest are all single-family subdivisions that have been developed to the west of the proposed annexation area. • Maya Angelo Elementary School and Delta High School are both located to the southeast of the proposed annexation area. • Thirty-eight acres of land at the northeast corner of Burns Road and Broadmoor Boulevard was annexed to the City in 2015. • 160 acres of land at the northeast corner of Burns and Broadmoor Boulevard were annexed this year. • Burns Road has been identified in the Comprehensive Plan as the rout for a major trunk line to serve the annexation area and of properties north of Burns Road. • The City is in the process of completing a detailed sub -area development plan for the Adams property to the south of Burns Road and west of Broadmoor Boulevard 2. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general welfare. The property may be annexed to the City and will need to be zoned. The justification for the rezone is the fact that if a zoning designation is not determined the property could become annexed without a zoning. For the advancement of the general welfare of the community the property needs to be zoned consistent with the established development patterns. 3. The effect rezoning will have on the nature and value of adjoining property and the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning the proposed annexation area to low-density residential such as R-1 is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and would be considered a proper implementation of the Plan. The Mullen and Sharma Annexation areas were both zoned R-1. Residential properties to the southeast in the City are also zoned R-1. The R-1 District would permit the continued development of single -families homes as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The effect on the property owners or owner if the request is not granted. Without the annexation area being assigned a specific zoning district, the area will essentially be un -zoned upon annexation. The area needs to be zoned for the benefit of the property owners and property owners adjoining the proposed annexation area. 5. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the property. There are no changing conditions related to the Comprehensive Plan. 9 The Plan has consistently indicated the proposed annexation area should be zoned and developed with single-family homes. Providing land for residential lots will support the policy of advancing programs that encourage home ownership. FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1) The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. 2) The Urban Growth Boundary was established by Franklin County in 1994. 3) The property is being proposed for annexation by the fall of 2016. 4) The annexation area is located in the pathway of residential growth and has been designated for low-density residential development by the Comprehensive Plan for over 30 years. 5) Properties to the southeast of the annexation area are zoned R-1 and developed with single-family homes. 6) The Water and Sewer Comprehensive Plans based future services needs within the annexation area on the low-density land use designation identified in the Comprehensive Plan. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a rezone the Planning Commission must develop its conclusions from the findings of fact based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.88.060 and determine whether or not: (1) The proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning the proposed annexation site to R-1 supports Plan Policy H -1-E. (2) The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will not be materially detrimental. Rezoning the proposed annexation area R-1 will cause the site to be consistent with the subdivisions to the southeast in the City and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The rezone will complement the zoning of the Mullen and Sharma Annexations Areas rather than be a detriment. The R-1 zoning will also be consistent with the latest Sewer Comprehensive Plan that 0 calls for the continuation of low- density residential to the north of the current Urban Growth Boundary. (3) There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole. There is merit and value in following the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan when assigning zoning to properties within the community. The Plan has indicated this property should zoned low-density residential for the past 35 years. Rezoning the area R-1 will leading to additional housing opportunities for Pasco residents. (4) Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and no mitigation measures are needed. (5) A concomitant agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. A concomitant agreement is not needed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The public hearing for this annexation will be on August 15, 2016. The zoning determination therefore needs to be completed by the Planning Commission on July 21, 2016. MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact as contained in the July 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council zone the Barker Annexation Area to R-1, as indicated on the zoning map identified as Exhibit # 1 attached to the July 21, 2016 staff report. 5 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2016-008 HEARING DATE: 7/21/16 ACTION DATE: 8/18/16 APPLICANT: CBC Student Housing LLC 90705 N Yakima Dr. West Richland, WA 99353 REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of CBC Student Housing in a C-1 Zoning District 1. Legal: Approximately the southeast 1/4 of Binding Site Plan 2002-06 General Location: 2900 block of N 20th Avenue (Parcel # 113 300 255) Property Size: Approximately 1.7 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from N 20th Avenue and Argent Road. 3. UTILITIES: The site is served by municipal water and sewer. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Commercial) and is vacant. Surrounding properties are zoned as follows: North: I-1 (Light Industrial); Tri -Cities Airport East: R -1 -PUD (Low Density Residential Planned -Unit Development); Sun Willows Golf Course South: C-1 (Retail Business district); Commercial uses West: R-1 (Low Density Residential); Columbia Basin College 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for commercial development along 20th and mixed residential along the golf course. Student housing is not a listed permitted use in any zoning district. Student housing aligns most closely with an R-3 or R-4 district for medium and high density residential. If the housing were to be located on the CBC campus a special permit application would consider this use as a modification to activities on the campus. Comp Policy LU -4-13 encourages the promotion of commercial centers which promote functional and economical marketing and operations. There are beneficial economies of scale that work for the benefit of property owners when like businesses are grouped together i.e., motels and restaurants. 1 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. ANALYSIS Applicant is requesting to locate a 3 -story, student dormitory for Columbia Basin College (CBC) students in a commercial zone. The dorm would operate year-round and would serve up to 125 students. Student housing is an unclassified use, and therefore requires review through the Special Permit process. The site is located on a vacant lot at the southeast corner of Argent Road and North 20th Avenue owned by the City. The proposed student housing unit would be located on the southeast corner of the parcel. The dorm would be the first phase of a 375 -unit project envisioned to ultimately include the entire east half of the parcel. Surrounding properties are a mix of Industrial (Airport) to the north, residential and recreational (Sun Willows Golf Course) to the east, hotel/office/commercial to the south, and the Columbia Basin College campus to the west. A golf course pond is located to the east of the proposed project and ownership of this amenity would be retained by the City. Parking for student housing is not specified in the code. On-site campus housing for some major universities is approximately .5-.7 spaces per bed. This project is off-site housing. With on-site food services the ratio may be able to be drop slightly. On-site bicycle parking is anticipated. A future hotel to the north and west of the proposed site would want access to and from 20th avenue. A single shared driveway on 20th Avenue would be required. A future access off of Argent is anticipated if the project expands to the north. A greenspace/plaza is anticipated to the north of the current project, ultimately being located between buildings. As the proposed project is located east of 20th Avenue no traffic impact fees are required. Since the dorm rooms are not complete dwelling units they do not require the Parks Impact Fee. The students will have CBC privileges to use all of the recreation facilities on campus. z While multi -family units require a fee of $4,525 per-unit School Impact Fee, dorm rooms do not meet the definition of a dwelling unit. As such, no fee will be required. The site design is still evolving at this time and staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the public hearing until site design issues can be resolved. PRELIMINARY FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Applicant desires to locate a 3 -story, student dormitory for Columbia Basin College (CBC) students in a commercial zone. 2. The dorm would operate year-round. 3. The dorm would contain approximately 125 units. 4. Student housing is an unclassified use, requiring review through the Special Permit process. 5. The site is vacant 6. The site is located at the southeast corner of Argent Road and North 20th Avenue. 7. The parcel is currently owned by the City of Pasco. 8. The proposed student housing unit would be located on the southeast corner of the parcel. 9. The proposed unit is phase one of a multi -phase development. 10. The overall project is anticipated to include 375 units occupying the entire east half of the parcel. 11. Surrounding properties include Industrial (Airport), residential/ recreational (Sun Willows Golf Course), hotel/office/commercial, and the CBC campus. 12. A city -owned golf course pond is located to the east of the proposed project would be retained by the City. 3 13. Parking for student housing is not specified in the code. 14. On-site campus housing for some major universities is approximately .5- .7 spaces per bed. The proposed project is off-site housing. 15. On-site bicycle parking is anticipated. 16. A single shared driveway on 20th Avenue would be required. 17. A future access off of Argent is anticipated if the project expands to the north. 18. A greenspace/plaza is anticipated to the north of the current project. 19. No Traffic Impact fees are required. 20. No Parks fees shall be required. 21. No School Impact fee will be required. PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 and determine whether or not the proposal: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for commercial development along 20th and mixed residential along the golf course. Student housing is not a listed permitted use in any zoning district. Student housing aligns most closely with an R-3 or R-4 district for medium and high density residential. If the housing were to be located on the CBC campus a special permit application would consider this use as a modification to activities on the campus. Comp Policy LU -4-13 encourages the promotion of commercial centers which promote functional and economical marketing and operations. There are beneficial economies of scale that work for the benefit of property owners when like businesses are grouped together i.e., motels and restaurants. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? 4 The site is served by all municipal utilities and the local street network. 20tb Avenue was designed to handle commercial traffic. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The intended character of the area is primarily commercial. The proposed use would be residential in nature, but not unlike high -traffic hotel uses located directly to the south. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof The proposed student housing would be similar in height to existing hotel structures to the south and college buildings to the west. The use would not be any more intensive than other uses permitted in the C-1 zone. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The proposed student housing would not generate more noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the C-1 Zoning District. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposed student housing would not create nuisance conditions or endanger public health or safety any more than the operation of any permitted uses within the C-1 Zoning District. PROPOSED APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to Binding Site Plan 2002-06 (Parcel # 113 300 255) 2) Number of units shall not exceed 375. 3) Parking shall be provided at a rate of .7 spaces per unit for the first 125 units. Future parking requirements shall be adjusted based on success of this formula. W 4) Curb, gutter, sidewalk and a landscaped entrance feature shall be required at the entrance point at North 20f Avenue. 5) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit for the authorized improvements is not obtained by September 1, 2017. MOTION: I move to continue the public hearing to the August 18, 2016 meeting. L � ` 5 Y i I _ i', K l 00 N F--1 � V 4-4 1^1 I� L � ` 5 Y i I _ filrSn f klY r r� Y i I _ i', K rg6E'�� of is W N J Pz 1 prl=L Z Z N z1pitR m is, a a� 3 N d — o o ' O U) 0 0 0 0 N r U) Z) M CJ2 coQ � y= - ^� L \ 'W 3AH H10Z U) `p W � Q cn -� V4) h� 4T-4 V PRNEV LN V V D � 0 0 � o 0 3 W zzLLJ �? h W U' d I 'Bx m ma el wuJss n euwro ss6xwmx w m Ir w U �a m Jw � L, Z O fJ 3xf1 NLIpH 3x1 OMIY 3 .OI.BGW L II MXIM'A 30 66YB ®' 2 pJ3 m V70� 0 V h O 2 It— Z W Z l Z Ln O O O U% S W a d a = N la_ UQ' 0�m00 wtn3 �� •„ m a�oa �>-LLJ 0Q\I"1L� — tim�NZZZppe a f Ngo zj 0w gig gLZpo't L- 0 p 0 � I \ imm \I Q X N — C122 a p sa€m a N :a o � i k LLI N M .zo..pEo s Q B .GB q. 3 . h .20..gL0 N I -ory M tl3a ,4aE01 O ONOtl 3Stlf9J ib'J M .ZO..pip 6 w Q i F i5 4)S ® R w" I w m � M .zB,rgzB s 1 o � S M •ZO..pEO 5 i $� 3 Ice I R go pp a 'ri � -•RRI ;RIR :4 ��� I x _ ox as ma I __G 4N3W35tl3 A4lLLfl ,51_ 3_20_MiON „ €o o "g '34V MW N ^ 6.ZLL}pio pxa asmsxal a'lu axa 89 STALLS DRIVE PROPOSED SITE SCALE'. V=60'-0" CBC HOUSING COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE SITE PLAN A T1 C 07/14/16 l W V IC A R C H I T E C T$ I LL_ iZ w ❑��- - _ ---- I �J HATCHED AREA IS PHASE II&III WORK -PHASE 7 89 STALLS DRIVE PROPOSED SITE SCALE'. V=60'-0" CBC HOUSING COLUMBIA BASIN COLLEGE SITE PLAN A T1 C 07/14/16 l W V IC A R C H I T E C T$ / •. ƒ�\:m a.m m >�� >\� . . � y«.� »: ^ r, � a . 2�. - :y! x� ,j. f+f"F �1 Aa 1' Izz1 ,j. f+f"F �1 Q4 1 1. MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 2017 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator ai w SUBJECT: 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ALLOCATION (MF# BGAP2016-003) Reauests for Funding Attached for your review and consideration are the CDBG Fund and Proposal Summaries (Attachments 1 & 2) relating to our Community Development Block Grant Program for program year 2017. Eleven (11) requests for funds were submitted totaling $1,056,086.00. Applicants will present their proposals before the Planning Commission on July 21, 2016. Estimated Funds Available It is estimated that the 2017 annual entitlement grant will be $670,000 based on the award for program year 2016. Prior year funds available for commitment are $76,920 making a total of $746,970 in funds available for use in 2017. There is always some question regarding actual funding levels approved by Congress. Actual available funding for these FY 2017 activities will remain in question until the early part of the year when the CDBG allocation is made by Congressional Resolution. If funding levels are lower or higher than estimated, activity funding will be reallocated in accordance with the contingency plan. Public Service Cap HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support public service activities may not exceed 15% of the combined total of the entitlement plus the prior year's program income. For 2016, the estimated entitlement of $670,000 the maximum available for public service activities $100,500. Current requests for public services total $132,500. Staff recommends a maximum of $90,000 for public services (13%). Planning & Administration Cap HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support planning and administration activities may not exceed 20% of the combined total of the entitlement plus the current year's program income. For 2017, the estimated entitlement of $670,000 makes the maximum available for planning and administration $134,000. Current requests for planning and administration total $120,000. Staff recommends a maximum of $131,170 for planning and administration (19%) due to the additional burden for HOME and NSP grant administration. The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. Attachments: 1 2017 CDBG Fund Summary 2 2017 CDBG Proposal Summary 3 2017 CDBG Projects and Proposal Requested 0 8 8 8 8 T O O O O Am 8 $ 8 A W r O O r r O o O o O p O O O ^ C 9 C 9 9 <<< w Q v e d W o m m o w C Nm d 3 c Oi v v m O o o p„ O D °, 0, p°, p-�, Q m m m 0 0 0? 0 3 0 0 3 o v o 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 o n n n n o 0 y 3 3 3 3 3 0 3 RD 3 0 3 3 3 3 5'J 3 0mJ 3 J RD m m R' 3r m a ^m m Ra m Re Ra y m ? ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 c 3 3 3 O j 0 C C C 2 ry 2 2 2 2 N O ry O ry ry ry O 3 2 2 2 2 3 3 N n N a o w W w w n w 3 m a 3 n n m ¢ m m <; O ^ n < ° w c ° rn o �. O o. m 0 r n 0 v r n = m v m a n cc c n, ^ D m e G is g n g c D n » - � n ' � o o n c 0 s o m O Ro 3 2 u a 3 n n R' n a o m 0 n o O O O N O VI UNi S pl T d '1a' oe c g 8 m o rfO.� O m O O N O y pI a N O O S S S 8 O O O O O O O f° to +n to in S O O V7 O O O O U N W O y q o 8 8 8 8 8 S 8 0 8 8 e W 3 � A o c n 0 a, O v � o O 0 D0 !+ N N F+ N N W W W W ➢ n Q b A x L m ➢ D m D D m w m m o 0 CITY OF PASCO 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY — JULY 21, 2016 CDBG Program Administration — Requested: $120,000 Recommended: $120,000 CDBG funds provide for salary and benefits for the Block Grant Administrator to plan, administer and provide for the successful delivery of housing, community development and economic activities. The City receives funds for CDBG, HOME and NSP activities. The Block Grant Administrator ensures compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws for programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people in Pasco. Planning and Administration is capped at no greater than 20%. 2 Civic Center Recreation Specialist — Requested: $ 35,000 Recommended: $ 20,000 CDBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Civic Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for at risk youth and families in the immediate service area. Public services are capped at no greater than 15% of current entitlement plus prior year program income. 3 Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist — Requested: $37,500 Recommended: $ 20,000 CDBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Martin Luther King Center. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to school age children and families in the Kurtzman neighborhood service area. 4 Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist — Requested: $ 37,500 Recommended: $ 30,000 CDBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly of Pasco with support services, nutrition, health and living skills support. CITY OF PASCO 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY — JULY 21, 2016 YMCA Martin Luther Kine Community Center Recreation Program — Requested: $ 20,000 Recommended: $ 20,000 CDBG funds provide YMCA recreation programs at the Martin Luther King Center. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to school age children and their families. 6 Pasco Specialty Kitchen Technical Assistance — Requested: $100,000 Recommended: $ 57,750 CDBG funds provide for wages, salaries and benefits for Technical Assistance at the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, a certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical assistance to small startup food -related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance, the startup businesses agree to create and/or make jobs available to low -to -moderate income persons. Additional funds are needed to meet staffing requirements to continue existing programs and establish new programs. 7 Code Enforcement Officer — Requested: $ 48,000 Recommended: $ 48,000 CDBG funds provide a portion of the salary and benefits for one of four code enforcement officers to help bring approximately 500 properies into compliance with City codes. Code enforcement encourages property owners to maintain housing units to minimum property standards and improves neighborhood appearance in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204). Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services — Requested: $ 4,000 Recommended: CDBG funds provide minor ADA accessibility remodels, minor repairs and construction of wheelchair ramps for very low to low income households. This population includes elderly and disabled (City-wide). It is estimated that 5 elderly households, typically very low income, will be assisted CITY OF PASCO 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY — JULY 21, 2016 9 Peanuts Park Rehabilitation (Construction/Phase Ill — Requested: $300,000 Recommended: $315,000 CDBG funds are requested for rehabilitation of Peanuts Park facility which serves the Downtown Revitalization Area and includes Longfellow and Museum neighborhoods. Facility improvements are needed to renovate the existing facility to meet current and future needs. 10 Sidewalk Construction Accessibility — Requested: $100,000 Recommended: $105,000 CDBG funds are requested to construct new sidewalksin the central core area surrounding the Senior Center where they are missing to provide a link to existing sidewalks, and allowing continuous safe pediestrian route, eliminating barriers for all pedestrians. Sidewalk is missing in front of the relocated Senior Center. 11 Pasco Housine Revitalization — Requested: $100,000 Recommended: CDBG funds provide minor ADA accessibility remodels, minor repairs and construction of wheelchair ramps for very low to low income households. This population includes elderly and disabled (City-wide). It is estimated that 20 households, typically very low income, will be assisted. Q d0 A w D Ut 0 0 m 3 Cl O w i N m w A 0• A ti w n ^ b � A y 3 � ^cr C= O v O W o C) s m cc S, � O N N 10 C j J_ 2 w a v 3 60 N N � m v o g j p m m p y 7 N 3 o y 0 3 m o 0 o_ m mZ m nnJ � 3 m y n 0 o a � y O V n w 3 o n m n w 6 m d y N a S m m N n y J D n m m O m w � o m 3 D J jp y a m � O m O a a fp w 3 � N y {Op m w vo'i B o. a J a � v J a fA a W tp V o � `= -4 y A 1 J � n � b b A � � O o mn D 0 m O - nl 3 c 3 amv 3 m m �'w N c m moo. J � J y S m w m-^ J � N 6 � 0 a� m m o � m a y F o c O 3 y y o Dn- a a O . 3 �m m m° Awa m T n � o Z w � v3 o w 3 O H 0 m w a a � m a O W 6 O m O N x O O '@ ^ a_ v m m ^ y D� a w 3 m p y 6 a 62. y `2 N S 5' c a� d O J o m 3 9.3 SJ_ w o r m y A. o OWj m � G O O QJ O A 1 J � n � b b A � � O o mn D 0 m O - nl 3 c 3 amv 3 m m �'w N c m moo. J � J y S m w m-^ J � N 6 � 0 a� m m o � m a y F o c O 3 y y o Dn- a a O . 3 �m m m° Awa m T n � o Z w � v3 o w 3 O H 0 m w a a � m a O W 6 O m O N x O O '@ ^ a_ v m m ^ y D� a w 3 m p y 6 a 62. y `2 N S 5' c a� d O J o m 3 9.3 SJ_ w o r m y A. 3 JO V m O 0 Vim. "I y wry�J� � rA- ti A O P0o< m3 n m n b O s 'a m O 3 m n c nni O z T n M C N O ° m r O J ^ a man O a 0 3 r m T C c m o m x o 2 m y m n c w 3 y m m a c n i N m a N ° � N 0 O m o=0- o y 3 m' J ry C m m m V m O 0 Vim. "I y wry�J� A O P0o< m3 n � � b " O �m T m O 3 m n c O z T n M C N O ° m r O J ^ a man 0 3 m Ny Da N �a O c x Dm J a ° < G) o y m m m a c n i N m a N ° O 3 O o=0- o y 3 m' J V m O 0 Vim. "I y V 0 m 0 0 0 0 N O O wry�J� ti O P0o< m3 n y 3 D 00 T m O 3 m n c O z T n M C N O ° m r O J ^ 0 3 m Ny Da Q x £ ° V 0 m 0 0 0 0 N O O e El oZ' AN A h A ro h w gyp° e^ � O J O OO N A m n a o o V 0 M m'N f g N � N C Q s;' w j N � O 0 O 4p n y 3 J q El oZ' AN i y� y A h A ro h w gyp° e^ � O J O OO N A m <' o moo V S M m'N f g N � S Q s;' 3 o N O N am J �_ v 4p F N 3 q a a fi 60m =m m 00 a 3ma J� n J a s J m m T 3 o o w m 0- a y mmo �c a �l e g3 J. n N v Q o 3 o J 2 P. i A h 4p � N S o J o w N O N a O A fi >• m m � N o h � OPNd Oto Q N A A � m o a 3 � x o a m aa= o a o- `. � o° u H S fD � tO 0 3 � A N mN ai n D A S d 0 N Z, H3 0 O o 0 pl O_ F N N fi O � C A o- o C rn `. F SQ J N N N D O = ry � J N J y N J C O C g o 3 0 2 `A a3? o N (� N 0 O y 50 m c v 3 Q h a o� f m a J a Q J. O a q O J m a b N ad � O y m 'o 0 a m as M m J3 3 3 � b N � 6 ` � a 923 o O N O c R o Na M m A N0 a O O r� Q 0 m n O O N 0 0 O 3 a � o3 a p p as 3 c o m n G po o Jp mF 0 p O op w ^� N J O = Ut O b o .b n i y� y A h A ro h bh J O N A m a o m J x V 0 M j N S 0 on a N N J N N o N x o 3 �_ v a n J 10 S T O � 0- 0 O Oa N V n N v O y P. N O A h N J an o 3 N N J fD N s o D A � m o a 3 � x 0 o- `. � o° u H o � S � A 411 S N N N M o- o rn `. F J D J y n A g o w D N (� N 0 O y J v d J a b n q O � d a b N O y a m m 0 F N � 6 � c o lhp O O i y� y RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-1-1 CITY OF PASCO-COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CDBG PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION # Assessment Question Yes No N/A I Score 1. Is the Subreci ient new to the CDBG Program? 3 1 O 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 Q a. Has this activity been completed ® 1 O successfully in prior years? b. Have performance goals been met in prior 1 1 0 years? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 O findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or Ti- 0 O inexperienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 0 I corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 individual or business? 7. What type of Activity? 3 Public Service 3 Economic Development 2 Acquisition 1 Planning/infrastructure/facilities 0 8. Does your project involve construction / 0 renovation? a. Do you own the property? 0 b. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score -r- ' 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 5 pints 6-9 points MEDIUM RISK 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: CDBG Program Administration Applicant: City of Pasco -Community & Economic Development REVIEWER: Comments. concerns & questions: Activity Category: REQUEST $120,000 NONCDBG$ HUD Matrix Code: 21A Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.206 National Objective: 570.205 N/R ConPlan Go egy: All I All �1 Perf. Goal 54 eople Assisted Ct NRSA? YES / NO )\)k OK on terms current rant? G/ NO Alloc./priority = A II AWARD: �f i5p HUD Activity: 934 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES [;rNO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES B;' NO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES [!r NO❑ 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES 9?r NO❑ 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES E�' NO[-] 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES 0? NO❑ 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES []RNO❑ 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? j YES ElNO[Tr How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement FS 7/ YES [r NO[] 9. Application form is complete? YES R NO❑ If NO, indicate missing information needed 10. Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? ^ II ^^ YES ❑ NO[:] N 1T Date Follow-up Action Ar I� 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES ❑ NO❑ 570.205 Benefit to low, very low and low income persons N/R Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12. �j Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit N/K requirements? YES ❑ NO❑ Source of information: Who provided information: Survey Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response Service Area. (See Attached Addendum 1) % Benefit to low income Client files Presumed benefit zas' --;kx9 13. Does application address a City objective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in 010 — 2 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? NO Goal / Strategy: All / All Program Administration 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK All 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES ❑ NOF If yes, indicate which activity (ies) — List all actions proposed for funding 570.206 General Program Administration Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ No If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES ❑ NO[—] N N 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) YES ❑ NOV If response is YES, identify potential compliance areas where special or extensive technical assistance might be needed: Reviewed by: Q/ Vt.e!/L / I ' p4rvan 7/1/2016 Angela R Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Date C-2017-1-1 HUD CDBG Program Administration TITY ^F� F Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco — Community & Economic Deve Address 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301 Project Name CDBG Program Administration Contact Person Rick White, C&ED Director Telephone 545-3441 Email & ECONOMIC Federal Tax ID # 91-6001264 DUNS # 009974598 (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested $120,000 Leverage $0 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. CDBG funds are used to plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws and provide for for the successful deliver of programs that primarily benefit low -moderate income people. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. All CDBG activities in Pasco benefit primarily low -moderate income persons. Census tracts 201, 202, 203 BG 3&4 and 204 are 71% LMI, there are 24, 190 persons, 17,171 of which are LMI. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? ALL GOALS Goal # All Strategy # Objective # Outcome # 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: ALL PRIORITIES - This activity serves every type of eligible activity allowable under CDBG/HOME/NSP regulations. M11111111,11111 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check onlyone box-a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2014 Community Survey data Census Tract # Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. (See attached) 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. As long as Pasco is an entitlement city, CDBG funds will be utilized for planning & administration of the grant. 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served Milestone/Goal (include numerical performance progress if any) 1° Quarter Closeout prioryear grant and prepare Consolidated Plan Evaluation Report (CAPER) Complete environmental review for current program year awarded projects Execute subrecipient agreements and fund activities for drawdown 2" Quarter Prepare Request for Proposal for next grant year 3` Quarter Desk and Site Monitoring of all activities Reporting Budget Preparation 4` Quarter Submit Annual Action Plan for next grant year Timeliness 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick Pasco $120,000 $120,000 $120,000 $116,000 Richland 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2016 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick- Pasco - Richland Requested CDBG 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 Effective June 5, 2016 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Salaries (CDBG) $75,075 Salaries (HOME) $10,000 OPERATIONS: Admin Services Fees $12,000 Advertising $950 Utilities $1,000 Supplies $3,050 Professional $5,800 Development CONSTRUCTION: Engineering If 1'• '.I 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? HUD allows for up to 20% of the entitlement to be utilized for planning and administrating the Block Grants. Networking and training are very important aspects of this activity, however, Professional development/professional services may need to be abandoned. If grant funds for Administration do not cover minimum costs, funds will need to be requested from the General Fund or programs reduced significantly. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Staff time is necessary for proper planning and administration of the grant programs. With the need for grant monitoring, oversite, and compliance there is a need for properly trained and experienced grant staff. 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ S. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? El a. Do you own the property? ® ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (choose one) a. Public service ❑ b. Economic Development c. Acquisition d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Signature of Afuthorized Agency Official A}ela K. Pifw* , (dock 6✓a0A On5fi4rif Printed Name & Title 41'e-1 Date RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-2-2 CITY OF PASCO-ADMINISTRATIVE & COMMUNITY SERVICES CIVIC CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST # Assessment Question Yes N/A Score 1. Is the Subreci fent new to the CDBG Program? 3 IN 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? Q a. Has this activity been completed 1 d successfully in prior years? b. Have performance goals been met in prior ® 1 1 d ears? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 0 findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 mex erienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 0 corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 individual or business? 7. What type of Activity? Public Service 3 Economic Development 2 Acquisition 1 Planning/infrastructure/facilities 0 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 renovation? a. Do you own the property? 0 1 b. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 0-5ointsLOW 6-9 points MEDRJM RISK 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Civic Center Recreation Specialist Applicant: City of Pasco -Administrative & Community Services REVIEWER: Comments, concerns & questions: Activity Category: REQUEST $ 35,000 NONCDBG$ 36,100 HUD Matrix Code: 05 Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(1) LMA ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 3 / 3.2 Perf. Goal 17725 People Assisted NRSA?YES/NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = B2 AVERAGE AWARD: HUD Activity: -LOW 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES E� NO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES R'NO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES O❑ 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES V' NO❑ 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES K NO❑ 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES NO❑ 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES NOR 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee?onff YES ElNO(1� How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement ADW' YES ['NOF 9. Application form is complete? YES RrNO❑ If NO, indicate missing information needed 10. Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ❑ NOD Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES F'NO❑ 570.208(a)(1) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMA Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements? fnJ SD ✓ YES J9 Source of information: Who provided information: Survey f -4 US LAIR -1 Civic Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response 1 I So�D LMS �J V Service Area. LAA -1 (See Attached Addendum 1) - C ( LA C 6909-r :11, 5-_ % Benefit to low income Client files Presumed benefit 13. Does application address a City objective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010 714 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES [M- NO❑ Goal / Strategy: 3 / 3.2 Focus on the basic living needs of lower-income households and individuals by addressing one or more priority populations and needs. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK B2 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES IJ NO[:] If yes, indicate which activity (ies) - List all actions proposed for funding 570.201(a) Public Services (General) Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ NOR( If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES ❑ NO❑ N A- 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) YES ❑ NOD If response is YES, identify potential compliance areas where special or extensive technical assistance might be needed: Reviewed by: V/'Qr=q, %-I I' ' ' V,- W-- " 7/1/2016 Angela R Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Date Applicant Address Project Name Contact Person Telephone C-2057-2-2 HUD Civic Center Recreation Specialist OAS Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year RECEIVED City of Pasco- Administrative & Community Services 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 " " -- Civic Center Program rOt IAMITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Director ABCS 509-543-5757 Federal Tax ID # 0955001284 (required) CDBG Funds Requested $35,000 Email temayr@pasco-wa.gov DUNS # OG9974598 (required) Leverage $36,100 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. The are a significant number of people from low to moderate income families who are considered at -risk that benefit from participation in recreation programs at the City Hall Activities Center (525 N. 3rd Ave). The activities provided occur on week days and weekends but are especially essential during the crucial after-school hours. The CDBG funds will be used to pay for wages needed to provide the programs at the facility. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. Pasco as a whole is over 56% Hispanic and in the population under the age of 18 that percentage is nearer 75%. The neighborhoods that the City Hall drop-in after-school program primarily serves are those with a higher minority population and are designated low -moderate income (Census Tract 202 = 87%). 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) —what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # III Strategy # 2 Objective # 1 Outcome # 1 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority i>❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: Provides a safe and productive recreational environment for the low to moderate income children and families especially in the immediate area surrounding the Pasco City Hall. 2017 CDBG Application 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ Other: Describe C. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. d. Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income 6. Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. Project Address/Location: Boundaries: Census Tract(s)# 202 Block Groups (s)p 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. •PublicService — People/Housing — Households • Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households • Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses • Economic Development— Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 261 288 300 Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1't Quarter 150 people $116.6667 $17,500 20' Quarter 60 people $116.6667 $7,000 3r" Quarter 50 people $116.6667 $5,833.33 4t" Quarter 40 people $116.6667 $4,666.67 TOTAL 300 people $116.6667 $35,000 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 261 288 300 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick Pasco $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Richland 30 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? This will provide wholesome recreational opportunities for underprivileged members of the community especially youth during the after-school hours. We will measure our success by the number of participants. 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. Effective June 5, 2016 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. 2016 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland Source of Other 1 Person 1 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 Effective June 5, 2016 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. 2017 CDBG Application Requested CDBG Source of Other Expense Funds Other Funds Funds TOTAL BUDGET PERSONNEL: $35 OOO G 3�a100 $3,500 �^erel Fund&Program Fees $38,500 Salaries `r' f OPERATIONS: $32,600 City General $32,600 Rent/Lease Utilities Fund Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor / Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL 1 $35,000 $36,100 $71,100 2017 CDBG Application 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Yes, they are from the city General Fund. 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? First we will look for additional general fund support. Second, some services may have to be cut. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) The plan would be to look for sponsors, grants and donations. As well as requesting greater general fund dollars and charging more user fees. 16 Check "yes" or "no for each of the following questions: Assessment Question as No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? ❑i El 1 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? x a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? x❑ I❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? x❑ ❑ 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings? ❑ Q 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? Q 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 0 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? x a. Do you own the property? 0 ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? x ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration ❑ 2) Public Service x❑ 3) Economic Development ❑ 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) ❑ 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) ❑ 6) Code Enforcement ❑ 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) ❑ 8) Revitalization (Describe): El 2017 CDBG Application Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and [/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY , "m Signature of Authorized Aekncy Official /I Qcck- ferw(5LV lJIY2LT0 r Printed Name & Ti le L Irl C �niclItKunr r! �ervlc.eS Cel7_5/16 e — Date 2017 CDBG Application Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 CDBG Program Year Public Service Special Attachment #1 Complete this page if you are continuing a "Public Service" activity 1. When was your agency organized / formed? 1801 2. Is your agency a Washington State municipal or non-profit corporation and/or a faith Yes No ❑ based organization? 3. Does your agency have federal IRS non-profit status? Yes ® No ❑ 4. List any required accreditation your agency/ staff must have in order to do business: None S. To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this purpose? City General Fund 6. Will CDBG assist in leveraging or matching other funding? Yes ❑ No Q 7. Is this the first year for the program? Yes ❑ No a. Year began: 8. If you receive funding for 2017, how will your program be funded in the future? Anticipate CDBG Funding in 2018 and city funding through City General Fund. 9. If you received CDBG funding in 2017 and are requesting increased funding, please quantify the increase in service that you will provide during 2017 and explain new demand or unmet need in the community for the increase in service. Not requesting an increase over 2016 requested amount 2017 CDBG Application 6 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-2-3 CITY OF PASCO-ADMINISTRATIVE & COMMUNITY SERVICES MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST # Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the Subrecipient new to the CDBG Program? 32. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 0 ONIAScore a. Has this activity been completed/1 l� successfully in prior years? b. Have performance goals been met in prior 1 1 ears? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 0 findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 inex enenced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 0 Q corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 A AT individual or business? 7. What type of Activity? Public Service Economic Development 2 Acquisition 1 Planning/infrastructure/facilities 0 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 renovation? O a. Do you own the property? 0 1 b. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 0-5 points LOW RISK 6-9 points MEDIUM RISK 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist Applicant: City of Pasco -Administrative & Community Services REVIEWER: Comments, concerns & questions: Activity Category: REQUEST $ 37,500 NONCDBG$ HUD Matrix Code: 05 Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(1) LMA ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 3 / 3.2 Perf. Goal 26955 People Assisted NRSA?YES/NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = B2 AVERAGE AWARD: HUD Activity: JZ15k 3 - Lata 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES 9? NO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES V,�,�,NO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES UEr//NO❑ 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES u NO❑ 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES [✓]� NO[:] 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES [{]' NO❑ 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES [ANO❑ 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? YES ❑ NO[' How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement k060Z YES RT' NO[—] 9. Application form is complete? YES Ej? NO❑ If NO, indicate missing information needed 10. Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ❑ NOD Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES Ff NO❑ 570.208(a)(1) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMA Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. ON 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements?J� 5�� ES 0, NO❑ Source of information: Who provided information: (J" '/ F �}-. Survey sJ &qG - Z W[Lk Uwt- Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response �0 Service Area. L-9 t'1 "7,(See Attached Addendum 1) -7S. Z2 -/o Benefit to low income f,0 �9,55- Client files Presumed benefit 13. Does application address a City objective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010 - 29,1 4 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES L& -f NO❑ Goal / Strategy: 3 / 3.2 Focus on the basic living needs of lower-income households and individuals by addressing one or more priority populations and needs. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK B2 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES g?' NO❑ If yes, indicate which activity (ies) - List all actions proposed for funding 570.201(a) Public Services (General) Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ NOer If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES ❑ NO[-] N r\- 17. T 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) YES ❑ NOKTI� If response is YES, identify potential compliance areas where special or extensive technical assistance might be needed: Reviewed by:/YI CMIX-t \- 1 /VVffWrvL 7/1/2016 Angela R Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Date C-2017-24 HUD Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist _r o r. Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Applicant City to Pasco- Administrative B Community Services Address 525 N. 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 RECEIVED Project Name Martin Luther King Community Center F, ' a U 2012 Contact Person Rick Terway, Director A&CS ;C611.1UNITY & ECOt10611C DEVELOPMENT Telephone 509-543-5757 Email temayr@pasm-wa.gov Federal Tax ID # 0916001264 DUNS # 009974598 (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested $37,500 Leverage 856,300 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. Funding is needed to provide facility and programs for youth and adults living in low -moderate income neighborhoods on Pasco's east side. The Majority of the activities will take place at the Martin Luther King Center which is located at 205 S. Wehe Ave. in Pasco 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. Pasco as a whole is over 56% Hispanic and in the population under the age of 18 that percentage is nearer 75%. The neighborhoods that the Martin Luther King Center primarily serves are those with higher minority poplulation and are low -moderate designation. The percent low -moderate income in this census tract (201) is 84%. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) —what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # III Strategy # 2 Objective # 1 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Polity (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority ❑■ C. Low Priority ❑ Outcome # 1 D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: This is a social service project to assist disadvantaged youth within the city of Pasco. The goal is to build strong kids, strong families, and a strong community through games, activities, and special events and by stressing caring, honesty, respect, and responsibility. 2017 CDBG Application 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ Other: Describe C. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. d. Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income 6. Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. Project Address/Location: 205 S. Wehe Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 Boundaries:Census Trans (Blocks): 201(2,3,4), Census 202(1,2,3), 203(1,3), 204(1,2,3,4,5,6), 205 s. Block Groups Tract(s)# wehe, Pasco, WA 99301 (CT201) (5)# Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. x Public Service—People/Housing—Households -Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households 'Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses - Economic Development— Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 1176 1344 1400 Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1" Quarter 300 People $26.7857 $8,035.71 2rd Quarter 300 People $26.7857 $8,035.71 3'd Quarter 500 People $26.7857 $13,392.86 41h Quarter 300 People $26.7857 $8,035.72 TOTAL 1400 People $26.7857 $37,500 Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 1176 1344 1400 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick Pasco $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 Richland 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? This will provide wholesome recreational opportunities for underprivileged youth in the community especially during the after-school hours. We will measure our success by the number of participants. 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD Income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland Requested CDBG 1 Person 1 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 Effective lune 5, 2016 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: $20,000 $20,000 Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease $17,500 $22,500 City General $40,000 Utilities Funds Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor / Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: $33,800$33,800 Ci General Funds Describe) TOTAL $93.800 2017 CDBG Application 13 Are the above "other sources' of funds secured? Please describe: Yes, they are from the city General Fund. 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? First we will look for additional general fund support. Second, some services may have to be cut. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) The plan would be to look for sponsors, grants and donations. As well as requesting greater general fund dollars and charging user fees. 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes I No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? ❑I El 1 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? ❑ x a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? Q ❑ It. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? x❑ ❑ 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings? El 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? El 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? El 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? El a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration ❑ 2) Public Service EJ 3) Economic Development ❑ 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) ❑ 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) ❑ 6) Code Enforcement ❑ 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) ❑ 8) Revitalization (Describe): 2017 CDBG Application Certifications and Assurances [/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Signature of AuthoLdAgency Official Printed Name & Title Date 2017 CDBG Application Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 CDBG Program Year Public Service Special Attachment #1 Complete this page if you are continuing a "Public Service" activity 1. When was your agency organized / formed? 1891 2. Is your agency a Washington State municipal or non-profit corporation and/or a faith organization? 3. Does your agency have federal IRS non-profit status? 4. List any required accreditation your agency/ staff must have in order to do business: Yes Yesil None No E]based No ❑ 5. To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this purpose? None 6. Will CDBG assist in leveraging or matching other funding? Yes ❑ NoV 7. Is this the first year for the program? Yes ❑ No IV a. Year began: 20. Year ago 8. If you receive funding for 2017, how will your program be funded in the future? Anticipate CDBG Funding in 2018 supported through City General Fund. 9. If you received CDBG funding in 2017 and are requesting increased funding, please quantify the increase in service that you will provide during 2017 and explain new demand or unmet need in the community for the increase in service. Requesting same amount as requested in 2016. 2017 CDBG Application 6 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-2-4 CITY OF PASCO-ADMINISTRATIVE & COMMUNITY SERVICES SENIOR CITIZEN'S CENTER RECREATION SPECIALIST # Assessment Question Yes No N/A Score 1. Is the Subreci ient new to the CDBG Program? 3 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 a. Has this activity been completed ® 1 O successfully in prior years? b. Have performance goals been met in prior 1 1 years? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 0 v findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 inexperienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 0 corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 N a individual or business? 7. What type of Activity? Public Service �, V Economic Development 2 Acquisition 1 Planning/infrastructure/facilities 0 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 renovation? a. Do you own the property? 0 1 b. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 0- oints LOW 6-9 points MEDIUM RISK 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist Applicant: City of Pasco -Administrative & Community Services REVIEWER: Comments. concerns & questions: Activity Category: REQUEST $ 37,500 NONCDBG$200,500 HUD Matrix Code: 05A Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(2) LMC ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 3 / 3.2 Perf. Goal 1100 People Assisted NRSA? YES / NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = B2 AVERAGE AWARD: HUD Activity: kisk 3 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES [-✓' NO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES Lr NO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES [' NOD 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES Er NOD 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES NO[:) 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES NO[:) 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES [ANO❑ 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? YES ❑ NOe' How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement Jrf Z YES Er NO❑ 9. Application form is complete? YES O'NO❑ If NO, indicate missing information needed 10. Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ❑ NO[-] LMr Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? y YES [J NO❑ 570.208(a)(2) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMC Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements? lbl) YES [V� NO❑ Source of information: Who provided information: -�' I (�' allii Survey -17 Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response Service Area. (See Attached Addendum 1) % Benefit to low income Client files vl�— Presumed benefit 06% 13. Does application address a City objective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010 — 2014 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES BrNO❑ Goal / Strategy: 3 / 3.2 Focus on the basic living needs of lower-income households and individuals by addressing one or more priority populations and needs. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK B2 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES V NO❑ If yes, indicate which activity (ies) — List all actions proposed for funding 570.201(e) Senior Services Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ NO[2-� If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES ❑ NO❑ N 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) YES ❑ NOB' If response is YES, identify potential compliance areas where special or extensive technical assistance might be needed: Reviewed by: lJ/'1�,(,(, I I - f AV11F 44V\ 7/1/2016 Angela R Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Date Applicant Address Project Name Contact Person Telephone Federal Tax ID # CDBG Funds Requested C-2017-23 HUD Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year RECEIVED City of Pasco- Administrative & Community Services I; I N 9 t) Itt24� 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 COMMUNITY 8 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Senior Center Rick Terway, Director A&CS 509-543-5757 0916001264 (required) Email terwayr@pasm-wa.gov DUNS# 009974596 (required) Leverage $200,500 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. Funding is needed for staffing to provide services to people 50 and older. These services help to provide social, mental and physical needs of seniors within Pasco. The services include fitness, footcare meals, educational, presentations, arts and crafts, and other leisure activities. Most services are provided free to senior citizens and will take place at the building located on N. 1st Ave., Pasco, in front of the multi -modal building. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. Though Pasco has a relatively low 65+ senior population (6.7k), Pasco also has the lowest per capita income level in the Tri -Cities area. Pasco also has the fewest number of senior living housing complexes which limits the availability of activities and social opportunities available to Pasco's senior population. This helps fill that need. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) —what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal# lu Strategy# 2 Objective# 1 Outcome# 1 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: This is a social service project to assist seniors. 2017 CDBG Application 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box— a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑� Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ Other: Describe C. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. d. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income 6. Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. Project Address/Location: Approximately 525 N. Ist Ave., Pasco Boundaries: Will service any seniors from throughout Pasco but location of building is in Tract 202 Census Block Groups Tract(s)ff 202 (s)ft B. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. 'Public Service—People/Housing—Households 'Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households `Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development— Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 829 975 975 Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1n Quarter 400 People $38.4615 $15,384.60 2nd Quarter 225 People $38.4615 $8,653.84 31d Quarter 200 People $38.4615 $7,692.30 4`h Quarter 150 People $38.4615 $5,769.23 TOTAL 975 People $38.4615 $37,499.97 Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 829 975 975 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick Pasco $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,006 Richland 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? Seniors within Pasco will have the opportunity to socialize and participate in the many programs that" offer. We will measure success by tracking participation numbers throughout the year. 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland Requested CDBG 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 Effective June 5, 2016 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. 2017 CDBG Application Requested CDBG Source of Other Expense Funds Other Funds Funds TOTAL BUDGET PERSONNEL: $37,500 $95 000 General Fund &Fees $132,500 Salaries , r OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease $47,000 General Fund $47,000 Utilities & Fees Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor / Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: $58,500 services General Fund $58,500 (Describe) TOTAL $37,500 1$200,500 $238,000 2017 CDBG Application 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Yes, they are from the city General Fund. 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? Some services may have to be cut and layoffs may take place. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Seek additional general fund monies, look for sponsors, charge user fees for specific programs, and to seek donations. 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? ❑ x 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? x a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? 0 ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings? El 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? 0 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ x❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? Q a. Do you own the property? El ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration x❑ 2) Public Service ❑ 3) Economic Development ❑ 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) ❑ 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) ❑ 6) Code Enforcement ❑ 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) ❑ 8) Revitalization (Describe): 2017 CDBG Application Certifications and Assurances ]/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurf�ed in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY:: ij'v_ Signa re of Authorized Agency cial l��c)LTerr,�a y, ��rrP Pr' to Name & Title Q;►n fi�,vh, �UlGes C¢��5 /l$ Date r�- 2017 CDBG Application Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 CDBG Program Year Public Service Special Attachment #1 Complete this page if you are continuing a "Public Service' activity 1. When was your agency organized / formed? 1891 2. Is your agency a Washington State municipal or non-profit corporation and/or a faith Yes No ❑ based organization? 3. Does your agency have federal IRS non-profit status? YesX❑ No ❑ 4. list any required accreditation your agency/ staff must have in order to do business: None 5. To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this purpose? City General Fund 6. Will CDBG assist in leveraging or matching other funding? Yes ❑ No ❑M 7. Is this the first year for the program? Yes ❑ No a. Year began: 20+ years 8. If you receive funding for 2017, how will your program be funded in the future? Anticipate CDBG funds in 2018 and City General Fund and program fee monies. 9. If you received CDBG funding in 2017 and are requesting increased funding, please quantify the increase in service that you will provide during 2017 and explain new demand or unmet need in the community for the increase in service. Requesting the same amount as requested in 2016 2017 CDBG Application 6 RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-2-5 YMCA OF THE GREATER TRI -CITIES YMCA MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER RECREATION PROGRAM # Assessment Question Yes Nq N/A Score 1. Is the Subreci fent new to the CDBG Program? 3 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 (,0 a. Has this activity been completed 6) 1 O successfully in prior years? b. Have performance goals been met in prior 1 1 ears? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 0 findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 inexperienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 0 corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 N individual or business? iA 7. What type of Activity? Public Service 3 3 Economic Development 2 Acquisition 1 Plan-ting/infrastructure/facilities 0 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 0 renovation? a. Do you own the property? 0 1 b. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 0-5 ointsLOW RISK 6-9 points MEDIUM RISK 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: YMCA Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Program Applicant: YMCA of the Greater Tri -Cities REVIEWER: Comments, concerns & questions: Activity Category: REQUEST $ 20,000 NONCDBG$ 20,000 HUD Matrix Code: 05 Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.201(e) National Objective: 570.208(a)(1) LMA ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 3 / 3.2 Perf. Goal 26955 People Assisted NRSA?YES /NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = B2 AVERAGE AWARD: HUD Activity: IQ.iS�- 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES [d'No❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES VNO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES Y'NO❑ 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES P'NO[-] 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES &r NO❑ 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES 2' NO❑ 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES (kr NO❑ 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? YES ❑ NO[Er How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement YES [g NO❑ 9. Application form is complete? YES [Y'NO❑ If NO, indicate missing information needed 10. Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? nn YES ❑ NO[-] N �i Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES 2'N0❑ 570.208(a)(1) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMA Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements? YES k NO❑ Source of information: Who providedinformation: L.VSb 10�3� Survey VA,j � !J I ,Z tw<r-..1V- Instrument reviewed q Lo Adequate sample/response �IS'7/2�� ' ^' "' Service Area._ M(See Attached Addendum 1) 15.2Z % Benefit to low income 1p -' 5 W q6 Client files Presumed benefit 13. Does application address a City objective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010:—:214 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES NO❑ Goal / Strategy: 3 / 3.2 Focus on the basic living needs of lower-income households and individuals by addressing one or more priority populations and needs. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK 62 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES I!f' NO❑ If yes, indicate which activity (ies) — List all actions proposed for funding 570.201(e) Public Services (General) Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ NO IL1i If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES ❑ NO[] N Ar 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) YES ❑ N09?" If response is YES, identify potential compliance areas where special or extensive technical assistance might be needed: Reviewed by: a�,JK. 0�0- � 7/1/2016 Angela R Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Date C-2017-25 HUD 1ICA Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Progr Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Applicant YMCA of the Greater Tri -Cities Address 1234 Columbia Park Trail Project Name Pasco YMCA at the Martin Luther King Jr. Center Contact Person Steve Howland, Executive Director Telephone 509-374-1908 Email steve@ymcatricities.org Federal Tax ID # 91-0655754 DUNS # 11-938-0736 (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested $20,000 Leverage $25,000+ 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. The Pasco Y at the Martin Luther King Jr. Center (MLKC) offers a safe, positive and healthy environment for youth, teens, young adults and families living in and around the Kurtzmen Park neighborhood. The YMCA offers organized soccer leagues, as well as facilities including a computer lab, homework center, game room, weight room and gymnasium. Financial Assistance is provided for those that cannot afford the full program fees, and we provide annual memberships for all ages for $10.00/year, daily passes for only $1.00. The Y has been providing programs at the MLKC for over 30 years with cooperation from the City of Pasco. CDBG funding is needed to assist in program operations after United Way eliminated funding 2014. Some of that funding will be restored starting July 2016, but only about one third of what it previous was. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. The Kurtzman Park neighborhood is located in Census tract 201. This is a low income, at risk neighborhood with 27.8% percent living in poverty compared to the 17.1% for overall Franklin County. The neighborhood does not offer easy access to other parts of town due to the railroad overpass. This census tract is also unique in that of the nearly 10,000 residents it is estimated by the census that 42% are under the age of 18. This makes the need for the Y program even more important to the area youth. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 3 Strategy # 2 Objective # 1 Outcome # 1 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority ® C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: We meet this priority by providing programs to disadvantaged youth living in the vicinity of Kurtzman park and surrounding neighborhoods in Pasco. S. How does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV - ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ Other: Describe C. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. d. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income 6. Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. L1 Project Address/Location: 205 S. Wehe, Pasco, WA 99301 Boundaries: We are open to all residents, but our focus is on the neighborhoods east of Oregon Ave. Census Tract(s)# 201 Block Groups (s)4 All Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. *Public service—People/Housing—Households *Homebuyer— Unit ofineasure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/ or businesses Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 613 1,146 101 0 1,613 3 2,070 Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1s` Quarter 470 Participants $9.66 $4,541 2� Quarter 450 Participants $9.66 $4,348 3` Quarter 525 Participants $9.66 $5,073 4` Quarter 625 Participants $9.66 $6,038 TOTAL 2,070 Participants $9.66 $20,000 Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 613 1,146 101 0 1,613 3 2,070 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick 0 0 0 0 Pasco $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 0 Richland 0 0 0 0 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? Success is measured by participation in the programs that we offer and the attendance at the Center. 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland Requested CDBG 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 Effective June 5, 2016 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Program Fees, UW, Grants, Salaries 15,000 96,037 Internal funds 111,037 OPERATIONS: Program Fees, UW, Grants, Rent/Lease 0 1,400 Internal funds Utilities 0 1,656 Supplies 5,000 3,765 11,821 CONSTRUCTION: Engineering 0 Materials 0 Labor / Contracts 0 0 PROPERTY: Purchase Price 0 Closing Costs 0 0 OTHER: Program Fees, UW, Grants, (All other costs) 0 3,867 Internal funds 3,867 TOTAL 20,000 106,725 126,725 13 Are the above "other sources' of funds secured? Please describe: Not all funds are secure at this time, however history shows we should be on solid ground. Presentations to our Community Foundation takes place September 2016 and. our Annual Campaign January -March 2017. United Way for the first half of the year is secure at $5,000. 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? If partial funding is provided we may need to consider program cut backs, such as reduced hours. With the small amount of United Way funds received in 2017, it would cushion us if CDBG funding was cut back. If funding is completely eliminated, we most likely will need to close the Pasco Y at the MLKC. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Program funding is only for the direct cost of staff and supplies, not overhead. Others including; Foundations, private donors and United Way also assist in providing for the service delivery of our programs at the MLKC. 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? a. Do you own the property? ❑ ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration ❑ 2) Public Service 3) Economic Development ❑ 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) ❑ 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) ❑ 6) Code Enforcement ❑ 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) ❑ 8) Revitalization (Describe): Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Stephen Howland, Executive Director/CEO Printed Name & Title June 29, 2016 Date Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 CDBG Program Year Public Service Special Attachment #1 Complete this page if you are continuing a "Public Service" activity 1. When was your agency organized / formed? March 13, 1956 2. Is your agency a Washington State municipal or non-profit corporation and/or a faith based organization? Yes ® No ❑ 3. Does your agency have federal IRS non-profit status? Yes ® No ❑ 4. List any required accreditation your agency / staff must have in order to do business: The YMCA of the USA has established requirements including; audits, safety protocols, discrimination and ongoing training education requirements for the CEO and staff. 5. To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this purpose? We have been a recipient of a $20,000 grant from the Three Rivers Community Foundation, we will be applying for this grant again in the fall of 2016. We have also received a grant from the United Way of Benton -Franklin County for the 2016-17 cycle for $10,000, of which $5,000 will apply to the 2017 fiscal year. 6. Will CDBG assist in leveraging or matching other funding? Yes ® No ❑ 7. Is this the first year for the program? Yes ❑ No a. Year began: 1986 8. If you receive funding for 2017, how will your program be funded in the future? Through a combination of program fees, memberships, private donors, Community Grants and hopefully CDBG funding. 9. If you received CDBG funding in 2016 and are requesting increased funding, please quantify the increase in service that you will provide during 2017 and explain new demand or unmet need in the community for the increase in service. We are not requesting additional funds. The $20,000 allocation allows us to maintain the program at it's current levels. 6. Vicinity Map of project location & service area. Yellow highlighted area is Census tract 201. Blue marker shows the location of the Pasco YMCA at the Martin Luther King Jr. Center, green zone shows a 1 -mile radius showing our primary service area. w4� F �a-ov 2t f,r' Elko Us�.aa 2 z — _ F legnwue pr J 2,� tY f FarYncr&rC � � - n z f,&o30w'aY a�'f r� 2y 2 RG E prR V NA St s EtA fP9r ' 1? 5Y i15 ; [BSi F i /4vb SJ Cme �r 5 c; a ¢� r YW f ��'C. City of Pasco Community Development Block Grant Original Application Packet RECEIVED COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Proposal for the Pasco YMCA at the Martin Luther King Ir. Center YMCA of the Greater Tri -Cities the RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-3-6 DOWNTOWN PASCO DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -SK PASCO SPECIALTY KITCHEN TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE # Assessment Question Yes No N/A Score 1. Is the Subreci fent new to the CDBG Program? 3 0 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 a. Has this activity been completed () 1 C7 successfully in prior years? b. Have performance goals been met in prior () 1 1 years? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 inexperienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 0 1 corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 3 individual or business? 055i b1t 7. What type of Activity? Public Service 3 Economic Development (21) 42— Acquisition Acquisition I Planning/infrastructure/facilities 0 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 renovation? a. Do you own the property? 0 1 b. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 01-5 pnints T C) points MEDIUM RISK 10-15 points HIGH R 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Pasco Specialty Kitchen Technical Assistance Applicant: Downtown Pasco Development Authority -SK REQUEST $ 85,000 NONCDBG$ 50,000 HUD Matrix Code: 18B Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.203(b) National Objective: 570.208(a)(4) LMJ ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 2 / 2.1 Perf. Goal 12 Jobs NRSA?YES/NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = A2 HIGH AWARD: HUD Activity: Qj5(C & - Adlum 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES u NO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES [(NOD 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES [t� NO❑ 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES Rr NO❑ 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES ET NO❑ 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES Er NOD 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES 92' NO❑ Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? YES ❑ NORr How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement YES 0 NO❑ 9. Application form is complete? _ J / NO, indicate '/ G� � e/ o+ YES ❑ NO� F �-� 10. If missing information needed l i Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ❑ NO[—] Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES 0700 570.208(a)(4) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMJ Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12 Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low nd to income ersons benefit requirements? '<Qp 11� YES El NO[:] of information✓ Who provided information: Survey Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response Service Area. (See Attached Addendum 1) Client files % Benefit to low income Presumed benefit SOS--Zv+4 13. Does application address a City objective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the -a9}9---2 T4' Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES 2"NO❑ Goal / Strategy: 2 / 2.1 Support businesses that create permanent jobs for lower-income residents. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK A2 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES [G} -NO❑ If yes, indicate which activity (ies) — List all actions proposed for funding 570.203(b) ED Technical Assistance (51 % LMJ) Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ NOD�r If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES ❑ NO[:) N Ar 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) Reviewe YES K/NO❑ If response is YES, identify potential compliance areas where special or extensive technical assistance Applicant Address C-20973-6 HUD Pasco Specialty Kitchen Technical Assistance IFE Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Pasco Specialty Kitchen 110S.4 th Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301 I RECEIVED Project Name PSK Technical Assistance -REV Contact Person Marilou Shea Telephone Federal Tax ID # CDBG Funds Requested 509-545-1172 Email msh 45-3169348 (required) $100,000 DUNS# 9 2016 aDo DEVELOPMENTilt 147706498 i (required) Leverage $25,500 ;' 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. The technical assistance CDBG grant allows PSK to serve low, low -moderate and above individuals interested in starting a food business that fosters economic development and creates job in Pasco and the surrounding community. This year, PSK is requesting $100,000 to support the new programs we've developed with a flat (no) budget: the popular Food Truck Friday (FTF) program—Phase One and Mobile Vending University (MVU)—Phase Two. FTF has generated in excess of $70,000 in revenue for participating small business mobile vendors, created at least 16 new jobs and added $4600 in new revenue for PSK. In addition to tracking revenue, vendors report that there have been 20 + incremental business opportunities for them which again multiplies the jobs created as a result of the FTF program. Mobile Vending University is a 5 -part business education series featuring subject matter experts that new mobile vendors depend on to navigate the start-up phase. Not only will this program provide access to key stakeholders it will provide critical information to these start-ups, reduce their learning curve and save them valuable time and money. MVU further positions PSK as the go -to source for all things mobile vending and is a strategic endeavor that will build the local mobile vending niche and provide economic development in its purest form: buying from local vendors, hiring local employees and selling to local customers. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. We'd like to expand on the incredible success of Food Truck Friday and Mobile Vending University (and other programs) by attracting new entrepreneurs which in turn will generate new business and revenue opportunities for PSK, create jobs and contribute to the revitalization Downtown Pasco. Financial and staff resources are limiting our ability to broaden these highly sought after programs. As one, yet critical aspect of PSK's programs, 2016 CDBG Application 3. food trucks offer local tax revenues, job growth, tourism, activate public space and foster entrepreneurship. MVU has generated $3150 in new revenue for PSK serving 9 new start- up businesses and 14 individuals in its first series. These businesses will be offered a kick- start with a spot offered to them at FTF 2016. At the same time, they will also serve to build our program by providing more options for consumers to choose from. Goal # 2 Strategy # 1,3 Objective # 3 Outcome # 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: By positioning PSK as the go -to source for mobile vending (aka food trucks) we create new revenue streams that help PSK become self-sustaining. Food trucks act as an incubator for entrepreneurs to start a viable, cash-flow positive business that they can potentially grow into a brick and mortar location and become a more stable part of the community. Thus advancing job creation and re- vitalization of Downtown Pasco. 2016 CDBG Application 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box -a, b, c, d) a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2014 Community Survey data Census Tract # Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ® Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2016. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. f ) 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served V 23 n Y 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2015 2014 Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1" Quarter Jobs/Business 7j? $25,000 2" Quarter Jobs/Business 70,z,2, $35,50074W 3' Quarter �j Jobs/Business $3s000 244';' a` Quarter Jobs/Business 71773,33 $30,000 TOTAL 12 $12R, -5_0b 160,6 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served V 23 n Y 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2015 2014 2013 2012 Kennewick 2016 CDBG Application 3 iluryj-0`2 Pasco 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Richland 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? As one aspect of PSK, continuing to build on the momentum of PSK as the subject matter expert in mobile vending is critical. Mobile vending is a prime example of business breeding business spawning growth in the local community and economy by hiring local employees, buying from local suppliers and selling to local customers. It also advances job growth in other sectors including but not limited to web developers, truck outfitters, licensing agencies and food and supplies retailers. Success will be measured by incremental business opportunities generated by mobile vendors, jobs created from pilot and extended FTF programs and revenues achieved by these small businesses. Their success fosters ongoing success for PSK. Additionally, MVU businesses will be part of a kick- starter program whereby they have an automatic spot at FTF for the first 60 initial days of their business. 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2015 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2016. 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense 2015 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick- Pasco - Richland Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,800 $16,900 $20,090 $24,250 $28,410 $32,570 $36,730 $40,890 50% $24,650 $28,150 $31,650 $35,150 $38,000 $40,800 $43,600 $46,400 80% $39,400 $45,000 $50,650 $56,250 $60,750 $65,250 $69,750 $74,250 Median $49,300 $56,300 $63,300 $70,300 $76,000 $81,600 $87,200 $92,800 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: 00 255P601 Program fees 50,000 Salaries S� cN� ,500 Private program 7,500 sponsorships OPERATIONS: 7D101) Rent/Lease S(�! Utilities I Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor / Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs 2016 CDBG Application OTHER: Program Yes (Describe) Development 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? costs TOTAL $125,500 $125,500 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Not at this time. We are planning to obtain corporate sponsors for Food Truck Friday and Mobile Vending University in 2016. 4 7 14 if you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? Existing programs (FTF and MVU) will not expand. This impacts the growth not only of small businesses but of PSK. New programs will not be pursued due to lack of resources available to our small staff of 2.5. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government orto maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Private and corporate funding resources. 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? Z ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure/housing/facilities ❑ 2016 CDBG Application Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and 1/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY (.P:1� Signaai ro/ff xutr' ed Agency Official 1 Printed Name & Title 2017 CDBG Application Community Development Block Grant Application 2016 CDBG Program Year Economic Development Special Attachment #2 Complete this page if you are proposing to provide an "Economic Development" project 1. We area: ® non-profit ❑ for-profit ❑ faith -based 2. Describe how your project will make the most effective use of CDBG funds? Expand existing PSK programs and allow development of new programs that attract low, low -moderate income individuals, create jobs and foster small business growth. 3. Is there leverage of other funds? We plan to obtain at least $7500 in private program sponsorships. 4. How will you assure that CDBG funds are not substituted for other non-federal investment? We'll adhere to CDBG guidelines and stipulations. 5. Can you demonstrate that your project will meet the minimum federal CDBG threshold of providing one full time equivalency job (32 hours per week) per $35,000 of CDBG funds, or provide goods or services to residents of a low -moderate income (LMI) area, such that the number of LMI persons residing in the area served amounts to at least one LMI person per $350 of CDBG investment, and that at least more than one half (51%) of the total jobs created will be filled by very low, low and moderate -income persons? How will you make sure that the jobs will be made available to very low, low and moderate -income persons? Absolutely. 16 new jobs have already been created by Food Truck Friday not including incremental business opportunities and jobs created as a result of FTF. We'll require income verification of potential employees of PSK clients and/or use approved work source agencies that provide that information. 6. Is your request being used for business incentives or for recruitment of a business from another city or state? If yes, describe in detail. Are the proposed jobs existing positions or are they new? 7. Show the number of new permanent jobs projected to be created (seasonal jobs do not count): Job Title # FTE Jobs Created # Part Time FTE Jobs Created # FTE Jobs Filled by # Part Time FTE LMI Jobs Filled by LMI Food service 1 2 1 2 Small business 1 2 1 2 ** LMI jobs refer to any job that can be held by a person with no advanced training or education beyond highschool —ora job that the business agrees to hire unqualified persons for and provide training. 2016 CDBG Application RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-6-9 CITY OF PASCO-COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER # Assessment Question Yes o N/A Score 1. Is the Subrecipient new to the CDBG Program? 3 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? a. Has this activity been completed CSl/ 1 successfully in prior years? Q b. Have performance goals been met in prior 0 1 1 years? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 0 findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 inexperienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 U corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 2 individual or business? P0551 bie 1`J 7. What type of Activity? Public Service 3 Economic Development 2 Acquisition 1 Planning/infrastructure/facilities COA Y 0 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 0 renovation? a. Do you own the property? ® 1 b. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score > 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 0-5 points LOW RISK 6-9 points MEDIUM RISK 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Code Enforcement Officer Applicant: City of Pasco -Community & Economic Development REQUEST $ 48,000 NONCDBG$ HUD Matrix Code: 15 Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.202(c) National Objective: 570.208(a)(1) LMA ConPlan Goal/Strategy: I/ 1 X Pert. Goal 29295 Household Housing Unit NRSA?YES/NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = Al HIGH AWARD: HUD Activity: 3 — Loo Activity Category: 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES V NO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES 02' NO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES [0 NO[-] 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES [q' NO[-] 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES [Er NO❑ 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES R NOD 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES [T NO❑ 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? ���.^ AV YES ❑ NO YQ How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement *I- YES ET NOD 9. Application form is complete? YES [R'NOD If NO, indicate missing information needed 10. Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ❑ NO[-] Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES ❑ NO[-] 570.208(a)(1) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMA Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements? � ,.� YES L�rfNO❑ Source of information: Who provided information: a Iy5P (d?)'w Survey %/7//5 un _3 ty'p YAWL Instrument reviewed o / tl yry V Adequate sample/response /0 5 �' C. Service Area. e.MA 3 (See Attached Addendum 1) -i5 • %Benefit to low income '?0?9 29Z0 5 Client files Presumed benefit 13. Does application address a City objective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010 — 2014 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES FlerNO❑ Goal / Strategy: I / 1. Maximize homeownership opportunities for lower-income and special needs households. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK Al 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES V NOD If yes, indicate which activity (ies) — List all actions proposed for funding 570.202(c) Code Enforcement Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ NOOK If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YE&Q—N6E] M A 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) YES ❑ 1409�1' If response is YES, identify potential compliance areas where special or extensive technical assistance might be needed: Reviewed by: ! — / • r'U d r' V "V 7/1/2016 Angela R Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Date C-2017-6-7 HUD Code Enforcement Officer crry OFF QMW Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco - Community & Economic Development Address 525 N Third Avenue, Pasco. WA 99301 RECEIVED Project Name Code Enforcement Officer £i IN 7 r7, 7011� Contact Person Rick White, C&ED Director :•w.. lITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone 545-3441 Email whiterPl2asco-wa.gov Federal Tax ID# 91-6001264 DUNS# 009974598 (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested $48,000 Leverage $200,500 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. ares. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. Blight conditions, property nuisances & fire hazards in homes & upon properties owned Wor occupied by low -moderate income families & lack of education of minimum housing & property standards for continue to decline without constant Code Enforcement & education efforts. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 1 Strategy # 1.2 Objective # 2 Outcome # 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: Funds would be used to may for a portion of the salary and benefits for a Code Enforcement Officer to conduct inspections in. low -moderate revitalization neighborhoods. 2017 CDBG Application 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ Other: Describe C. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. d. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income P1 91 Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. Project Address/Location: Boundaries: Census Block Groups Tract(s)tt 201.202.203.204 (s)a Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public Service—People/Housing—Households .Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households 'Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses . Economic Development— Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 24,444 7.034 10.024 1,998 16,731 Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost V Quarter 125 Houses/Proper-Lies 2nd Quarter 2S Houses/Properties 3rd Quarter 125 0 Quarter 1 TOTAL $0 ouseS Pro erfi s Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 24,444 7.034 10.024 1,998 16,731 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick Pasco S48.0nn $48,000 W.000 $48,000 Richland 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick- Pasco - Richland Requested CDBG 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 Effective lune 5, 2016 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. 2017 CDBG Application Requested CDBG Source of Other Expense Funds Other Funds Funds TOTAL BUDGET PERSONNEL: Salaries $48,000 $65,025 $17,025 $113,025 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor / Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL 1 $48,000 $65,025 $172025 $11130-25 2017 CDBG Application 13 Are the above "other sources' of funds secured? Please describe: The other funds will only be paid from the City's ,general fund. 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? will be served. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑X ❑ 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑ IS a. Do you own the property? ® ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration ❑ 2) Public Service ❑ 3) Economic Development ❑ 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) ❑ 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) ❑ 6) Code Enforcement 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) ❑ B) Revitalization (Describe): 2017 CDBG Application Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and [/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. ci io r.nirrrn ov. �FIIV��U e-6- C.ii i.� Printed Name & Title (� a7 -/C0 Date 2017 CDBG Application RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-4-8 CATHOLIC FAMILY & CHILD SERVICES-PASCO CATHOLIC FAMILY VOLUNTEER CHORE SERVICES # Assessment Question Yes NA N/A Score 1. Is the Subrecipient new to the CDBG Program? 3 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 �Q m. Has this activity been completed 1 successfully in prior years? n. Have performance goals been met in prior 0 1� 1 ears? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 D findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 I inexperienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 individual or business? J 7. What type of Activity? Public Service — Qtuo g19K' ria) Economic Development 2 ?j Acquisition I Planning/infrastructure/facilities 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 0 renovation?—VOL*i'06-I RGtrtO m. Do you own the property? 0 # n. Do you have construction contract management experience? D Qj N 120 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 0-5 LO 6-9 points MEDIUM RI5 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services Applicant: Catholic Family & Child Services - Pasco REQUEST $ 4,000 NONCDBG$ 42,186 HUD Matrix Code: 14A Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.202 National Objective: 570.208(a)(3) LMH ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 1 / 1.1 Perf. Goal 3 Household Housing Unit NRSA?YES /NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = C1 LOW AWARD: HUD Activity: g i5lc q — 111.eA um W.Fr'.'TiiR9" Activity Category: 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES B�'NO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES B�' NOF -1 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? Project demonstrates it can be completed within i r�Fo�rran� YES V NOD YES ❑ NO' p 5. project year? `6,, Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? 'UJW(A,1 YES ❑ NO[' 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES V NO❑ 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES Fr NOM 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? YES ❑ NOUEr How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement NO❑ 9. —YES Application form is complete? Add iii ,�/ YES v? NO❑ L If NO, indicate missing information needed f101 TA(v Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ❑ NO❑ Date Follow-up Action IL Application addresses a national objective? YES ❑ NOM 570.208(a)(3) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMH Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12 Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements? r� YES NO ❑ ❑ Source of information: Who provided information: Survey Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response 13. 14. 15 16. Service Area. (See Attached Addendum 1) % Benefit to low income Client files q n- ' Presumed benefit �/ � fp�}l dk% 4-,(b +z✓ (OrZd ya*S Does application address a City obiective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010 — 2014 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES ❑ NO❑ Goat/ Strategy: 1 / 1.1 Maximize homeownership opportunities for lower-income and special needs households. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK C1 Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) If yes, indicate which activity (ies) — List all actions proposed for funding 570.202 Rehab; Single -Unit Residential Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES arNO❑ YES ❑ NO5r If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YESE--Nd 110 A 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) YES Y NOM If response is YES, ide 'fy ote}tial compliance areas whgre special or extensive technical assistance might be needed: r(JS — AV Irk lOk% r4 y[ VO(U'n MWM inn mi amibilvl5 Reviewed by: 7/1/2016 Angela R Pi an, Block Grant Administrator Date Applicant Address Project Name C-2017-4-8 HDD Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services 1C,�*a Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Yakima, dba Catholic Family & Child Service 5301 Tieton Drive, Suite C, Yakima, WA 98908 RECEIVED Volunteer Services Contact Person Darlene Darnell COM1,1UNITY R Fnnunrsir DEVEL .PWNT Telephone 509-965-7100 Email ddarnell@ccvakima.ora Federal Tax ID # 91-1370404 DUNS # 809766970 (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested $4000 Leverage $42,186 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. Volunteer Services serves low-income elders over 60 and adults with disabilities over 18 in the City of Pasco. Many of these individuals, with an income of no more than $1000 per month or $1500 per month for a couple, are in danger of being displaced or losing their independence due to physical obstacles that can be cost-effectively overcome. Services to be provided with this CDBG grant will include projects that reduce physical barriers and enhance the safety of physically impaired individuals, such as the installation of hand rails or grab bars, construction of wheelchair ramps or special -sized steps to accommodate a walker, and other appropriate minor home repairs or modifications at the clients' homes. Community volunteers are recruited, screened, and receive appropriate training, including building code requirements, prior to beginning their volunteer service. All clients served with CDBG funds will meet the eligibility requirements of Volunteer Services and CDBG. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. As people age, they often experience obstacles that make it more difficult for them to continue living independently. Adults with disabilities, including those often associated with aging, may encounter barriers to accessibility to their own homes. Limited mobility and the subsequent use of a walker or wheelchair can make safe and easy ingress and egress from the home an overwhelming challenge to their continued independence. Rising home repair costs, the inability to physically make needed repairs themselves, and a lack of familiarity with local building codes make it difficult for elders and adults with disabilities with low to moderate incomes to modify their living areas to meet their special needs. The median monthly income of Volunteer Service clients in Pasco is $953. The construction of wheelchair ramps or the installation of grab bars by Volunteer Services, at no charge to the clients, is especially important in the City of Pasco. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 1 Strategy # 1 Objective # 1 Outcome # 1 Volunteer Services will improve the physical access to and/or safety within individual homes so that low to moderate income, physically -impaired adults may continue living independently in their own homes 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) 2017 CDBG Application (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ This is a high priority project as all services rendered under this grant (construction of wheelchair ramps or larger steps for walkers, installation of grab bars and railings, or other minor home modifications) will help reduce barriers for physically impaired adults. 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. X Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ® Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ® Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ Other: Describe C. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. d. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income 6. Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. Project Address/Location: City of Pasco, WA Boundaries: City Limits Census Tract(s)# Block Groups (s)# Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. -Public Service — People/Housing—Households *Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation —Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development— Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients 2017 CDBG Application 0 4 Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1'` Quarter 1 Home mod project 800 800 2" Quarter 1 Home mod project 800 800 3r Quarter 2 Home mod project 800 1600 4` Quarter 1 Home mod project 800 800 TOTAL 5 4000 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients 2017 CDBG Application 0 4 Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 3 5 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? Low-income elders and adults with mobility concerns will be able to have safe ingress and egress from their homes, allowing them to continue to live independently and participate in their neighborhoods and 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick 0 0 0 0 Pasco 3129 for 1/1/14- 12/31/16 $16,050 $18,050 3986 Richland 0 0 0 0 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? Low-income elders and adults with mobility concerns will be able to have safe ingress and egress from their homes, allowing them to continue to live independently and participate in their neighborhoods and 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland Requested CDBG 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 Effective June 5, 2016 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. 2017 CDBG Application 3 Requested CDBG Source of Other Expense Other Funds TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Salaries, 26,355 VS State Budget 26,355 Benefits, Taxes OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease/Utility 4194 VS State Budget 4194 Staff Travel 1975 VS State Budget 1975 Supplies, IT, Phone 1500 VS State Budget 1500 CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials 4000 2500 Donations, VS 6500 State Budget Labor/ Contracts PROPERTY: 2017 CDBG Application 3 Purchase Price Closing Costs Yes No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? ❑ OTHER: 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? Volunteer Travel ❑ 700 VS State Budget 700 Other Vol Expenses ❑ 2200 VS State Budget 2200 Agency Admin 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? 2762 VS State Budget 2762 TOTAL 4000 42,186 46,186 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: VS State Budget will be renewed 7/1/16; Donations vary year to year 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? The number of clients served may be reduced if no other funding for materials is available 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) NA 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ® ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? a. Do you own the property? [�]C b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration ❑ 2) Public Service ❑ 3) Economic Development ❑ 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) ❑ 6) Code Enforcement ❑ 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) ❑ 8) Revitalization (Describe): ❑ 2017 CDBG Application k Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: SignatSignat r�zed Agency Official Darlene Darnell. President and CEO Printed Name & Title A �2qd► Date 2017 CDBG Application Q U.S. City or Place: Pasco Washington Search Boundary Map and Geodata for the City of Pasco in Washington, U.S.A. Geolacts about Pasco, WA O vU o2 fM1ttos'//meos 000 om/mevs+=46242801-1191/559B8z=1284- 6M1I= - 1= = 1 Nep.n map erto/(Mtps://wwx.goopleown/maps/@Ga.2<29o1],q 19 L559a,12z/Eau=nOml!let!ti61?iMa{itlglB�ilg36C.po9fy Switch Area Map: City lus cit a ck o state) icil itl atl46.251123fi8onl-119.1 2 ]1 CoUnNo t -a a Ico entanlstate o f Itl1530054atldfi. 39] 5 3 80 61 9.51119]9 5 3 3 993 fi I c B. ZIPS f/ - - I ' 19933611 1382930]2 49 Con. Dist. flus-cd-area-maolstateM]A/adI cdid153041 Switch Boundary Map: Gq county l/us-county-boundary-ma 1-1195119)954152 State flus-stale-boundary-maolstateM/A8at16624996396285351lonF11912)0)38420161 LP31/us-xlo3-bountlarv-mapMP319938a116639376745472168on1-118823390)49)611 DP5 /us A code bounds ma hi 9 tM.2138 830) 94 896892)146 Con. Dist, I - d -b tl 1 1 M/AI tl104/ dEl 3041 Advenisemen!: View PDF 1) Dick the download button 2) Th!s will take you to our web page Al nnwninad thc_ LAFP RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-5-9 CITY OF PASCO-ADMINISTRATIVE & COMMUNITY SERVICES PEANUTS PARK REHABILITATION (CONSTRUCTION/PHASE II ) # Assessment Question Yes No N/A Score 1. Is the Subreci fent new to the CDBG Program? 3 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 Q a. Has this activity been completed ( 1 successfully in prior years? b. Have performance goals been met in prior r� (0 1 1 years? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 0 of findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 t inexperienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 0 corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 individual or business? 7. What type of Activity? Public Service 3 Economic Development 2 Acquisition 1 Planning/infrastructure/facilities 0 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 0 renovation? a. Do you own the property? 1 b. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 5 oints LOW RISK 9 points EDIUM RISK 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Peanuts Park Rehabilitation (Construction/Phase II ) Applicant: City of Pasco -Administrative & Community Services REQUEST $300,000 NONCDBG$400,000 HUD Matrix Code: 03F Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.201(c) National Objective: 570.208(a)(1) LMA ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 2 / 2.8 Perf. Goal 5810 People Assisted NRSA?YES/NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = Al HIGH AWARD: HUD Activity: ,2)5k S — 60A) 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit/ requirements? /n YES i" NO❑ Source of information: Who provided information: U�y 1SD � ;/ Ij jp Survey 6910 (,MA— 4 DI—P—w4 Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response Activity Category: �/ 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES E9 NO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES FE� NO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES [jr NO[:] 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES LJY NO❑ 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES ❑ NOS 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES 5Vf NO❑ 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES j' NO❑ 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee?, YES ❑ NOK How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement A04Z YES Ir NO[] 9. Application form is complete? YES ElNO❑ l If NO, indicate missing information needed tiv /� 6ylf/ C4)25/YL>�if7 Ay) Y9!/1 A Q127Ce 10. Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ET NOD Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES ❑ NO❑ 570.208(a)(1) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMA Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit/ requirements? /n YES i" NO❑ Source of information: Who provided information: U�y 1SD � ;/ Ij jp Survey 6910 (,MA— 4 DI—P—w4 Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response Service Area. � 44 (See Attached Addendum 1) '75.15 % Benefit to low income 4 4!35�Q Client files Presumed benefit 13. Does application address a City objective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010:—:214 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES NO❑ Goal / Strategy: 2 / 2.8 Improve parks and recreation facilities in targeted neighborhoods. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK Al 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES M'NOF] If yes, indicate which activity (ies) — List all actions proposed for funding 570.201(c) Parks, Recreational Facilities Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ NOS' If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES4�4AB PJ Pr 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project �manager, applicant iisanew organization, etc) ma,5I f' lltw 5eAt"J6)d YES Pr NOM If response is YES identify potential compliance areas where special or extensive technical assis ce might be needed: t 6" MLiI 1�•LM�&b1floll 15j C�++o� a awcf Iaw /��� Un i M''1OJu Reviewed by: 6hC1,& - 7/1/2016 Angela R Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Date C-201753 HUD Peanuts Park Rehabilitation (Construction/Phase II Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco EI V€8 Address 525 N 3rd Pasco, WA 99301 Project Name Peanuts Park Redevelopment Contact Person Rick Terway r ECDNOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone 509-543-5775 Email terwayr@pasco-wa.gov Federal Tax ID # 916001264 DUNS # 009974598 (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested $300,000 Leverage $400,000 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. Peanuts park is located in the focal point of the Maker's downtown revitalization plan. The park not only serves downtown visitors, but also the Museum and Longfellow neighborhoods. The park is out dated and non-functional. The proposed renovation will update and enhance the park adding new features such as play area, shade structures, and turf area etc. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. The current area is nonfunctional, proposed changes will allow a friendlier atmosphere encouraging increased use of the area, and beautify and enhance the area as a focal point for the downtown businesses area and residents of the Museum and Longfellow neighborhoods. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 2 Strategy # 8 Objective # 1 Outcome # 3 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: This is a bricks and mortar project that will result in visual physical improvements by improving and revitalizing a public park facility (Peanuts Park) in the downtown revitalization area of Pasco. 5. Haw does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) C. 12 El ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ Other: Describe ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. Project Address/Location: 109 S. 4`" Ave., Pasco, WA 99301 Boundaries: LMA4-Downtown Pasco Revitalization Area -Defined in Makers Revitalization Plan as Bonneville/14th north west to Tacoma/1st to Columbia Street south east, this area serves the Longfellow and Museum Neighborhoods to the north. Census Tract(s)# 201, 202 Block Groups (s)# 201-3, 202-1, 202-3 Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. *Public Service—People/Housing—Households *Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households *Rehabilitation— Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development— Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1" Quarter 2" Quarter $5,000 3 Quarter $280,000 4` Quarter $15,000 TOTAL 4285 People $52 $300,000 Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 4285 5810 73.8% AM I 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick Pasco $195,000 $320,000 $170,000 $358,000 Richland 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? The project will revitalize the current nonfunctional area which will allow a friendlier atmosphere and encourage and enhance the use of the area as a focal point for the downtown neighborhoods. 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense p 2016 HUD income Limit Guldelines for Kennewick- Pasco - Richland TOTAL BUDGET Funds 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 3$16,050 Salaries $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 5$26,750 4a8§0 Rent/Lease $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 8$42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Me$53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense p Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering General Fund Park impact fees Materials 300K 400K 700K Labor / Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL 3001000 400,000 700,000 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Yes, they are budgeted General Fund dollars. 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? Reduce or Limit the scope of the project 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Ongoing Maintenance expenses will be covered by the staff currently employed and scheduled to care for Peanuts Park through the General Fund. 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? 0 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings?El VN 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? a. Do you own the property? b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration 2) Public Service ❑ 3) Economic Development 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) 6) Code Enforcement 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) S) Revitalization (Describe): Redevelopment of Peanuts park, park is out dated and non-functional. The renovation will update and enhance new features such as play area, shade structures, turf area etc. Redevelopment of the park will encourage use from the downtown neighborhoods Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Signature of Authorized VP ncy Official Printed Name & Title L�Poh& Date RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C-2017-7-10 CITY OF PASCO-PUBLIC WORKS SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION ACCESSIBILITY # Assessment Question Yes Nq N/A Score 1. Is the Subreci ient new to the CDBG Program? 3 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 0 u. Has this activity been completed ® 1 0 successfully in prior years? v. Have performance goals been met in prior OO 1 1 years? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 0 Q findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 inexperienced? 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 0 corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 Nn_ fk individual or business? 7. What type of Activity? Public Service 3 Economic Development 2 0 Acquisition 1 Planning/infrastructure/facilities Q 8. Does your project involve construction / 3 0 renovation? O 10 u. Do you own the property? 0 1 v. Do you have construction contract management experience? 0 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 0-5 points LOW RISK 6-9 points ISK 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Sidewalk Construction Accessibility Applicant: City of Pasco -Public Works REQUEST $100,000 NONCDBG$ 10,000 HUD Matrix Code: 03L Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.201(c) National Objective: 570.208(x)(1) LMA ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 2 / 2.5 Perf. Goal 25850 People Assisted NRSA?YES/NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = Al HIGH AWARD: $ HUD Activit /yW44W Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements?l YE� S �NO❑ Source of information: Who provided informatioppn:LMDO !rQ 3/ � (` (,�j(f�j,Survey ,y���.,� Instrument reviewed Activity Category: 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES NO 2. Application clearly states proposal? �/ YES u NO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? YES NO❑ 4. Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES NOR 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES NO❑ 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES NO❑ 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES WNO❑ 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? YES ❑ NOV AA,^ How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement lith 2 YES P NO❑ 9. Application form is complete? YES j❑—NO❑ If NO, indicate missing information needed 10. Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ❑ NO❑ Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES ❑ NO❑ 570.208(a)(1) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMA Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. 12. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements?l YE� S �NO❑ Source of information: Who provided informatioppn:LMDO !rQ 3/ � (` (,�j(f�j,Survey ,y���.,� Instrument reviewed Servic Area. �+{N� ( (See Attached Addendum 1) f•5 %Benefit to low income /'L f77Z$- Client files Presumed benefit 13. Does application address a City obiective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010 - X014 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES ® NO❑ Goal / Strategy: 2 / 2.5 Improve access for persons with disabilities and the elderly by improving streets and sidewalk systems. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK Al 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES I(NO❑ If yes, indicate which activity (ies) - List all actions proposed for funding 570.201(c) Sidewalks Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES ❑ NOL/ If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES, NQ- n N 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) If response is YES, i might be needed: -L qIA a Reviewed by: Angela R P where special or extensive z /"). J,�ar/rte/ 7/1/2016 Block Grant Administrator Date YES V NO❑ C-2017-7-10 HUD Sidewalk Construction Accessibility Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year RECEIVED Applicant City of Pasco Public Works Address 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 Lia I Project Name 1" Avenue Sidewalk Improvements COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Contact Person Ahmad Qayoumi Telephone 509-545-3446 Email gayoumia@pasco-wa.gov Federal Tax ID # 91-6001264 DUNS # 009974598 (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested $100,000 Leverage $10,000 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. Construction of this sidewalk will provide pedestrian access to a regional transportation center for those with moauay impairment ana pnysicdl disabilities. Includes the replacement of a non -conforming ADA ramp, as well as construction of sidewalk and new ADA compliant ramps. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. Currently, there is no pedestrian facility connection from the residential area to the south to the transit center. This increases mobility for residents of the neighborhood by providing new facilities and upgrading 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 2 Strategy # 5 Objective # 1 Outcome # 1 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: Reduces barriers between residences and a regional transportation facility, while providing ADA compliant access ramps. 2017 CDBG Application Jim, Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco Public Works Address 525 N 3rd Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 Project Name 1" Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Contact Person Ahmad Qayoumi Telephone 509-545-3446 Email gayoumia@pasco-wa.gov Federal Tax 10 # 91-6001264 DUNS# 009974598 (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested $100,000 Leverage $10,000 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. Construction of this sidewalk will provide pedestrian access from low to moderate income neighborhoods to a regional transportation center, Improvements will include accommodations for those with mobility rrnpuumrm ono prnyuca, uauooraes. rncmaes me replacement of a non -conforming ADA ramp, as well as construction of sidewalk and new ADA compliant ramps. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. Currently, there is no pedestrian facility connection from the primarily low income residential area to thi south to the transit center. This increases mobility for residents of the low income neiahborhood by arm ,M 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) —what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 2 Strategy # 5 Objective # 1 Outcome # 1 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: Reduces barriers between low and a regional transportation facility, while providing ADAComDliont access romas. 2017 CDBG Application 1 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrantfarm workers ❑ Other: Describe C. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. d. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income 6. Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. Project Address/Location: 535 North 1st Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301 Boundaries: 20`" Avenue to the west, 1-182 to the north, Railroad tracks to the east, and the Columbia River to the south Census Block Groups Tract(s)# 201-204 (s)# 201-3; 202-1,2,3; 203-1,3; 204-1,2,6 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. 'Public Service—People/Housing—Households .Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households "Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses " Economic Development— Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 12,665 17,725 71.45% Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1°` Quarter 2° Quarter 3` Quarter 100% person $5.64 $100,000 4` Quarter TOTAL 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 12,665 17,725 71.45% 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick Pasco 100,000 42,072 400,600 266,716 Richland 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? It will make it easier and safer for pedestrians and people with disabilities to reach a regional transportation hub. The area is mainly LIM income households. 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick- Pasco - Richland Requested CDBG 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 epecove tune e, euab 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. 2017 CDBG Application 3 Requested CDBG Source of Other Expense Funds Other Funds Funds TOTAL BUDGET PERSONNEL: Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: $100,000 $10,000 Local $110,000 Engineering Materials Labor/ Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL $110,000 2017 CDBG Application 3 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Local funding is included in the CIP book for 2017 for City Council approval. 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? The scope may be reduced to match the available funds. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) N/A 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? S. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? ® ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration ❑ 2) Public Service ❑ 3) Economic Development ❑ 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) ❑ 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) ❑ 6) Code Enforcement ❑ 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) 8) Revitalization (Describe): 2017 CDBG Application Fqq Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and 1/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY Signature of Authorized Agency Official ,&-kh Printed Name me & Title -7/1 Date 2017 CDBG Application RISK ASSESSMENT FORM C -2017-4-I1 REBUILDING MID -COLUMBIA PASCO HOUSING REVITALIZATION # Assessment Question Y No N/A Score 1. Is the Subreci ient new to the CDBG Program? 3 0 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? 2 0 ' o. Has this activity been completed G 1 successfully in prior years? i p. Have performance goals been met in prior 0 1 years? 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit 1 0 findings? 4. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or 1 0 inex er.enced? 4U4 -f -j QW,F CJ&L$ 5. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been 1 2 0 corrected? 6. Does your project displace or relocate any 3 individual or business? P0(2i0e bort- 90 _ 7. What type of Activity? Public Service (JeCGYIi F S+n� ¢ Economic Development 2 J Acquisition I Planning/infrastructure/facilities 0 8. Does your project involve construction renovation? o. Do you own the property? 0 p. Do you have construction contract /n� management ex erience?.O_ N/A, d 1 10. Total score 11. CIRCLE RISK FACTOR: 0-5 points LOW RISK 6-9 points MEDIUM K 10-15 points HIGH RISK 15+ points EXTREMELY HIGH RISK CITY OF PASCO 2017 CDBG APPLICATION REVIEW Project Title: Pasco Housing Revitalization Applicant: Rebuilding Mid -Columbia �2M REQUEST $100,000 NONCDBG$ 60,000 HUD Matrix Code: 14A Eligible YES / NO Citation 570.202 National Objective: 570.208(a)(3) LMH ConPlan Goal/Strategy: 1 / 1.1 Perf. Goal 3 Household Housing Unit NRSA?YES/NO OK on terms current grant? YES / NO Alloc./priority = C1 LOW AWARD: HUD Activity: lb -fh�lh 1. Application received prior to deadline? YES [Z/NO❑ 2. Application clearly states proposal? YES M' NO❑ 3. Was application submitted by an eligible applicant? h pruCt 5 S YES ❑ NOIg ® Project demonstrates it can be completed within project year? YES ❑ NO[B� 5. Applicant documents the capability to conduct the proposed activity? YES Rr NOD 6. Application signed by an authorized official of the organization? YES 5 NOD 7. Project serves Pasco residents? YES 02' NOF 8. Applicant have direct business relationships with CDBG Committee? YES ❑ NO[ ' How will conflict of interest be avoided? Conflict of Interest Statement YES VNO❑ 9. Application form is complete? YES (9NO❑ ^^--� __ [ .'f If NO, indicate missing information needed ll�lR�! (.0:?](lN5:� — twGll�)6AXt %1a 10 Has incomplete or missing information (as listed in question 9) been provided? YES ❑ NO[:] Date Follow-up Action 11. Application addresses a national objective? YES ❑ NO❑ 570.208(a)(3) Benefit to low, very low and low income persons LMH Administration Area benefit Limited clientele Housing Job creation Preventing or eliminating slums or blighted conditions Activity is located in an area that meets the City's definition and the activity addresses the slum or blighting condition. Activity addresses specific conditions of blight on a spot basis. Alleviating an urgent threat to public health or safe Problem meets the definition of urgent threat as stated in regulations. Activity addresses problem causing the threatening condition. Application meets National objectives to extremely low, very low and low income persons benefit requirements? -MD YES ❑ NO❑ Source of information: Who provided information: �lf/ �illQ�yl�S Survey Instrument reviewed Adequate sample/response Service Area. (See Attached Addendum 1) % Benefit to low income Client files —.—A1(5 104 i/ Presumed benefit — !�-re ?iN"I" ozqV-bbxq;r 5 13. Does application address a City obiective (Strategic Action Plan) as stated in the 2010 — 2014 Consolidated Housing and Community Development Plan? YES RrNO❑ Goal/ Strategy: 1 / 1.1 Maximize homeownership opportunities for lower-income and special needs households. 14. What priority level does the proposed activity address? (Refer to Priority Needs Ranking contained in the Allocation Policy? RANK C1 15. Application requests funds for eligible activity(ies) YES 02"'NO❑ If yes, indicate which activity (ies) — List all actions proposed for funding 570.202 Rehab; Single -Unit Residential Public/Private acquisition 570.201 (a) Public facilities & improvements 570.201 (c) Removal of architectural barriers 570.201 (c) Public services 570.201 (e) (Housing) Rehabilitation and preservation activities 570.202(a) Economic development activities 507.203 Planning 507.205 Administration 570.206 (a -h) 16. Is applicant new to the City of Pasco's CDBG Program? YES J?rNO❑ If applicant is new (and is proposing a public service activity) does applicant document that the activity is new or an increased service level? YES-E� N 17. Does the proposed activity (or applicant) involve a level of technical assistance, which is greater than that normally provided for like activities? (Examples include: applicant has no history of managing Federal funds, project involves extensive or long term labor standards compliance actions, applicant is proposing a newly developed human service, applicant has no experience at marketing services, hiring contractors or managing construction projects, applicant proposes to construct a facility without using an architect or professional project manager, applicant is a new organization, etc) If response is YES, ide 'fy otenCaI compliance areas where might be needed: _ YES [2] NO❑ or extensive tecchhmgall assistance 7/1/2016 Date C-2017-4-11 HUD Pasco Housing Revitalization CITY OF PA.S001, �lllllu,��illlllllllll �' I� Community Development Block Grant Application 2017 Program Year Applicant Rebuilding Mid -Columbia Address PO Box 2221 / Richland, WA 99352 Project Name Pasco Housing Revitalization Contact Person Crystal Carter COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone 253-753-8324 Email crystalc-rebuildingmc@outlook.com Federal Tax ID # 81-2736884 DUNS # (required) (required) CDBG Funds Requested -4/00,000 Leverage .$(00' DOO 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving, and why the project is needed. Workina in cooperation with Pasco Code Enforcement officers and through the referral process we homeowners with diasbilities and veterans by offering needed housing and qrounds repair with no financial responsibility to the homeowner. We will partner with utilities departments to send out mailers with information on how to apply to assistance. We will also embark on a media campaign highlighting our service throughout the mid -Columbia region. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. Accordina to ACS 2008-2012 estimates nears 25% of Pasco residents live in poverty. The attached color coded map of Pasco indicates the median household income for residents of Pasco Since 2000 Pasco's population has risen more than 100% and more than 95% of available homes are occupied. (usA Com swfsfu) The 2015-2019 Tri -Cities consolodated Plan states "Given the age of the units in the cities, a need for continued rehabilitation is warrented," 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 2 Strategy # e and 7 Objective # 1 Outcome # 2 4. Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑x B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your application satisfies that priority: By offering free structure and property repairs to low-income homeowners we preserve and revitalize under -resourced neighborhoods. By offering free modifications for the physically impaired we help reduce physical barriers. Both efforts result in an increase in affordable and accessible housing with visual physical improvements. 2017 CDBG Application 5. How does your application meet the National Objective of primarily benefiting low and moderate -income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d) a. ❑x You receive income data verification from each individual or household beneficiary of the program b. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Other: Describe C. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate -income employees. d. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by American Community Survey data to be primarily low -moderate income 6. Provide a vicinity map (separate page) showing the location of the project and service area. Include a narrative description of the project boundaries (or address) and the area to be served. Project Address/Location: Boundaries: Census Block Groups 020400; O'the P 030100; Tract(s)fl prcmjeciaro.meM1nicallyimpesreeasmsyansereo=miessofbceron (s)p 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2017. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. 'Public Service—People/Housing—Households .Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households 'Rehabilitation— Unit of measure is houses •Economic Development— Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 809 median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 11 4 10 1t 11 a Please note that those we serve can be classified in multiple categories to the I We have done our best to estimate their diversity. Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1't Quarter 3 houses $5000 $15,000 2nd Quarter 5 houses $5000 $25,000 3" Quarter T houses $5000 $35,000 4th Quarter 5 houses $5000 $25,000 TOTAL 20 houses $5000 $100,000 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 809 median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 2017 CDBG Application 11 4 10 1t 11 a Please note that those we serve can be classified in multiple categories to the I We have done our best to estimate their diversity. 9. What is the dollar amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2016 2015 2014 2013 Kennewick o 0 0 0 Pasco 0 0 0 0 Richland a o 0 0 30 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? Our project(s) will increase the sustainability, of low-income owner occupied housing units through rehabilitation and revitalization of existing structures and property improvements. We plan to have a visual impact on the neighborhoods we serve as well as an emotional impact. Our success will be measured by the number of families served and the marked improvement in their living conditions. 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2017 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated in early 2017. 2016 HUD income Unlit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland Requested CDBG 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $25,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 38,750 80% $37,450 $42,800 $42,800 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $62,050 Media n $46,800 $53,500 $53,500 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $77,500 Effective lune 5, 2015 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. (Ia 2017 CDBG Application Requested CDBG Source of Other Expense Other Funds TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Salaries $15,000 $25,000 Sponsors and donors $40,000 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies $5,000 $5000 Sponsors/Donors $10,000 CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials $70,000 $30,000 Gifts in Kind $100,000 Labor / Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: $5,000 for outreach; (Describe) $5000 environmental study TOTAL $100,000 $ 00 $160,000 (Ia 2017 CDBG Application 13 Are the above "other sources' of funds secured? Please describe: No 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? As a non-profit corporation providing a free service to our community, funding is critical and has a direct impact on the number of families we can serve. We will serve as many families in the Mid -Columbia region as our funding levels allow. The granting of funds from the City of Pasco will allow us to dedicate those resources to the residents of Pasoo. We estimate that each project averages $5000 to complete, some are more and some are less. 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) As a start up our funding sources are limited but as we grow and the word spreads about our mission and the impact Rebuilding Mid -Columbia has on the neighborhoods we serve our funding sources will grow as well. With a solid history behind us we will qualify for an increasing number of grants and community donation dollars both from public and private sources. 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is your organization new to the CDBG program? x I ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the organization? ❑x a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑x ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ x❑ 3. Does the organization have unresolved audit findings? El x 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? x 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? x a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis -Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑x 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) 1) Administration ❑ 2) Public Service ❑ 3) Economic Development ❑ 4) Affordable Housing (acquisition/rehabilitation, etc.) ❑ 5) Public Facility (Buildings/Parks, etc.) ❑ 6) Code Enforcement ❑ 7) Community Infrastructure (curb/gutter/sidewalks/sewer/water, etc.) ❑ 8) Revitalization (Describe): According to dictionary.com REVITALIZATION is defined as 10 give new life to". That is the goal of the 20 projects Rebuilding Mid -Columbia plans to complete with the granting of CDBG funds in 2017. We want to bring new life to the neighborhoods of Pasco that have lost their vitality. We will do this by decreasing the number of sub -standard housing units FAI and increasing the level of pride residents of Pasco have in their homes and their community. 2017 CDBG Application Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Application to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all applications received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Application packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Application or any pre -award costs. All applications will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Signatu of Authorized Agency Official Printed me & Title Date 2017 CDBG Application USA.coMe Basic Information Population and Races Income and Careers Housing Pasco, WA Franklin County Washington State Kennewick, Richland, Pasco Area Local Data Search Search State, County, City, Zip Code, or Area Code U5Awm/ washinoton I Franklin County/ Pasco/99301/ Census Tact 0204p1. Census Tract 020400 in Franklin County, Washington Population 9.393(2010),seerank House Units 2 916, see rank Race Whites :37%.Hispanics :77.6%. Blacks 2%. Asians 0.8%. Pasco Olhemllu).2% Population Density: 4.872.81/so mi, see rank Median Household $30,943, see rank Income: Median House Price: $97,000, see rank Time Zone: Pacific GMT -8:00 with Daylight Saving in the Summer Land Area: 1.71 sq mi, see ank Water Area: 0.21 sq ml (11.06%),es•e rank State: Washington Area: Kennewick -Richland -Pasco, WA County: Franklin County City: Pasco Hot Rankings The Richest Census Tracts Nearby House Price Ranking Nearby PopulaWn Ranking Neartv Fastest / Slowest Growing Cilias in WA Hioh / Low WA Cities by Males Employed High / Low WA Cites by Females Employed Best / Worst CNes by Crime Rate h WA Richest / poorest Cities by Income in WA Ez� / Clamoes Homes by City in WA Most / Least Educated Cities in WA Census Tract 020400 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations Census Block Groups Map View. Full data. Click icon to show name. r'arn � is+ual ii Col, r 4� Kenne rck Show More Locations on the Map asS Census Blocks' i Census Block Groups' Census Tracts' F= Zip Codes School Districts Cities Counties Metro Areas p fir:,,: States Census Books, Census Bieck Groups, and _ L Census Tracts are goo areas that are nonrmay smatler than the size of a city. Census Sbcks provide block and community level bfomabon. (h3, They are great for understanding areas withina ofty. Map Reportamapenor Census Tract 020400 Block Groups WA0210204001 Pasco WA0210204002 Pasco WA0210204003 Pasco WA0210204004 Pasco WA0210204005 Pasco WAD210204006 Pasco •A census tract is a geographic area defined by the United States Census Bureau and used for the census. A census tract normally covers a smaller area than a city or zip code. On average, a census tract has around 4,200 residents. Census tracts are more uniformly distributed In terms of the number of residents than cities or zip codes. Also, the cansus tract demographic date is nearly 100% complete vs. less than 70% coverage of demographic data for cities and zip codes. Therefore using census tracts is an excellent way to compare and study smaller scale locations Inside and across multiple states. For example understanding the different areas of large city or comparing neighborhoods in one city to neighborhoods in another city. Census tracts can be further divided into census block groups and then finally census blocks for understanding locations in a block and a community level respectively. Census Tract 020200 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations Census Block Groups Map View. Full data. Click icon to show name. 03 'e•- �: Cil v, a^+P e:y f. Jae SI j z W All.*Sl w n..pt St Z 1=,rvs; Nyl,llt� St qy z , r M1 WSh�aonr sl _ _t W 6mertvJ ¢ St 4GO gl¢ 6.,: ... Census Tract 020200 Block Groups WA0210202001 Pasco WA0210202002 Pasco Local Data Search eaamas U SA f COM' Search State, County, City, Zip Code, or Area Code USA.com / Washington / Franklin County/ Pasco / 99301 / Census Tract 020200 Elle Census Tract 020200 in Franklin County, Washington Basic Information Middir Zip Codes Population and Races - -- School Districts Population 6.021 120101. ,see rank Hot Rankings Income and Careers House Units 1.772, see rank Housing° i His ni Blacks: Race The Richest Census Tracts Nearby :R Others :63.9 % House Price Ranking Nearby Pasco, WA Population Density: 6.296.72/so mlsee renk Population Ranking Nearby Median Household Fastest / Skavest Growing Cities in WA Franklin County Income: $31,927 see rank HirmI Low WA Cities by Maks Employed Median House Price: $114,100, see rank Hioh / Low WA Cities by Females t Washington State g Time Zone: Pacific GMT -6:00 with Daylight Saving in the Summer Employed i @Qct / Worst Cities by Crime Rate In WA Kennewick, Richland, Land Area: 0.96 sq mi, see rank Richest/ Poorest Cites by Income in WA Pasco Area Water Area: 0.00 aq mi (0.00%), see Exp/ Cmaps.t Homes by City in Slate: Washinaton WA Area: Kennewick -Richland -Pasco, WA Most/ Least Educated Cites In WA County: Franklin County City: Pasco School District: Pasco School District G°,Pnm mm' Census Tract 020200 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations Census Block Groups Map View. Full data. Click icon to show name. 03 'e•- �: Cil v, a^+P e:y f. Jae SI j z W All.*Sl w n..pt St Z 1=,rvs; Nyl,llt� St qy z , r M1 WSh�aonr sl _ _t W 6mertvJ ¢ St 4GO gl¢ 6.,: ... Census Tract 020200 Block Groups WA0210202001 Pasco WA0210202002 Pasco Map RePOn a map error WA0210202003 Pasco 'A census tract is a geographic area defined by the United States Census Bureau and used for the census. A census tract normally covers a smaller area than a city or zip code. On average, a census tract has around 4,200 residents. Census tracts are more uniformly distributed in terms of the number of residents than cities or zip codes. Also, the census tract demographic data is nearly 100% complete vs. less than 70% coverage of demographic date for cities and zip codes. Therefore using census tracts Is an excellent way to compare and study smaller scale locations inside and across multiple states. For example understand! ng the different areas of large city or comparing neighborhoods in one city to neighborhoods in another city. Census tracts can be further divided into census block groups and then finally census blocks for understanding locations in a block and a community level respectively. Show More Locations on the Map eaamas s: Census Blocks' (Census Block Groups' Elle Census Tracts' Middir Zip Codes Sovr,ol'�t School Districts Iti ?Counties r° Metro Areas :R states Census Blocks, Census Block and St ed areas tt am n Tmcts am ds E t.paa„ay smaller than Ina aCensus of city. Census Bbde pm ide bbd and community level infometion. p They are great for understanding areas xithina i day. If 4 itavr. svt Map RePOn a map error WA0210202003 Pasco 'A census tract is a geographic area defined by the United States Census Bureau and used for the census. A census tract normally covers a smaller area than a city or zip code. On average, a census tract has around 4,200 residents. Census tracts are more uniformly distributed in terms of the number of residents than cities or zip codes. Also, the census tract demographic data is nearly 100% complete vs. less than 70% coverage of demographic date for cities and zip codes. Therefore using census tracts Is an excellent way to compare and study smaller scale locations inside and across multiple states. For example understand! ng the different areas of large city or comparing neighborhoods in one city to neighborhoods in another city. Census tracts can be further divided into census block groups and then finally census blocks for understanding locations in a block and a community level respectively. USA�coMa Basic Information Population and Races Income and Careers Housing Pasco, WA Franklin County Local Data Search Search State, County, City, Zip Code, or Area Code USA,.rr / W,SNr,Qi.1 / Fmnkl'm Count v / Pasco / 99301 / Census Tract 020100 Census Tract 020100 in Franklin County, Washington Population House Units Race Population Density: Median Household Income: 9.654 (20101, see rank 2425, see rank Whites:30.9%. Humanics:87.7%. Blacks 1.8%. Asians:0.4%. Others:66.9% 587.47/sa mi, see rank $43,724, see rank POSTCARDS S O OR$22'89 t Census Tract 020100 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations Census Block Groups Map View. Full data. Click icon to show name. If In-0r''.ies Ai,parl + GO Ale Census Tract 020100 Block Groups WA0210201001 Pasco WA0210201002 Pasco WA0210201004 Pasco WA0210201005 Pasco Hat Rankings The Richest Census Tracts Nearby House Price Ranking Nearby Population Ranking Nearby Fastest / west Growing Cites n WA High / Low WA Cities by Maks Employed High / Lax WA Cities by Females Employed Best / Worst Chas by Crime Rate in WA Riclies / Por?? s Ckles by Income h WA Expensive / Cheacesl Homes by City in WA Most / Least Educated Cities in WA lD UeGotPrint.com Show More Locations on the Map Census blocks' Census Block Groups' Census Tracts' Zip Codes School Districts Cities Counties Metro Areas States Census Blocks, Census Block Groups, and Census Taoism are goo areas that are nommry smekarthes the she of a city. Census Blocks provloe block and wmrounfty level information. They ere great for undemtanding areas within a city. Burbank '�'_4r6 Map Repon a mop error WA0210201003 Pasco 'A census tract Is a geographic area defined by the United States Census Bureau and used for the census. A census tram normally covers a smaller area than a city or zip code. On average, a census tract has around 4,200 residents. Census tracts are more uniformly distributed in terms of the number of residents than cities or zip codes. Also, the census tract demographic date is nearly 100% complete vs. less than 70% coverage of demographic data for cities and zip codes. Therefore using census tracts is an excellent way to compare and study smaller scale locations inside and across multiple states. For example understanding the different areas of large city or comparing neighborhoods in one city to neighborhoods in another city. Census tracts can be further divided into census block groups and then finally census blocks for understanding locations in a block and a community level respectively. Median House Price: $108.300, see rank Washington State Time Zone: Pacific GMT -8:00 with Daylight Saving in the Summer Kennewick, Richland, Land Area: 14.88 sq mi, see rank Pasco Area Water Area: 1.55 sq mi (9.43%), egrank State: Washmaton Area: Kennewick -Richland -Pasco. WA County: Franklin County City: Pasco School District: Pasco School District .. POSTCARDS S O OR$22'89 t Census Tract 020100 Map, Border, and Nearby Locations Census Block Groups Map View. Full data. Click icon to show name. If In-0r''.ies Ai,parl + GO Ale Census Tract 020100 Block Groups WA0210201001 Pasco WA0210201002 Pasco WA0210201004 Pasco WA0210201005 Pasco Hat Rankings The Richest Census Tracts Nearby House Price Ranking Nearby Population Ranking Nearby Fastest / west Growing Cites n WA High / Low WA Cities by Maks Employed High / Lax WA Cities by Females Employed Best / Worst Chas by Crime Rate in WA Riclies / Por?? s Ckles by Income h WA Expensive / Cheacesl Homes by City in WA Most / Least Educated Cities in WA lD UeGotPrint.com Show More Locations on the Map Census blocks' Census Block Groups' Census Tracts' Zip Codes School Districts Cities Counties Metro Areas States Census Blocks, Census Block Groups, and Census Taoism are goo areas that are nommry smekarthes the she of a city. Census Blocks provloe block and wmrounfty level information. They ere great for undemtanding areas within a city. Burbank '�'_4r6 Map Repon a mop error WA0210201003 Pasco 'A census tract Is a geographic area defined by the United States Census Bureau and used for the census. A census tram normally covers a smaller area than a city or zip code. On average, a census tract has around 4,200 residents. Census tracts are more uniformly distributed in terms of the number of residents than cities or zip codes. Also, the census tract demographic date is nearly 100% complete vs. less than 70% coverage of demographic data for cities and zip codes. Therefore using census tracts is an excellent way to compare and study smaller scale locations inside and across multiple states. For example understanding the different areas of large city or comparing neighborhoods in one city to neighborhoods in another city. Census tracts can be further divided into census block groups and then finally census blocks for understanding locations in a block and a community level respectively. VI V) m: 9, O fM1 I^ v x 13 i�T v : s5' O Ro 0) a) (n 1 0 0 Id � it P P P T c z \E� N m m S P € o 13 i�T v : s5' O Ro 0) a) (n 1 0 0 13 i�T ..4r.L� TH,x l 11 Elm" W lz. 1 Qti3it 1.l 1j 11 I � it •'%tea..- � I- z \E� 13 i�T 11 Elm" W lz. 1 I � it •'%tea..- r z \E� 13 F Z w o � a LLI Z LL O � a � a 3 W LRA W LL Z U Z Z K Y � LLI O F z 3 0 Z J a m W w CO w X, N Z N W o V w a w ( p �! LL W J Z J� Y z ��J w U � cJ_ G LL ■ Z ® J Lo � 3 > z z w Y � a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �o i f V Z J Z � W LL Q K Q W N I— Y > W U W O Z w > > o 0 ■ Z O w� � �A ($} O Z L ¢ 0 N i'0 i U O F a 3 ca a) ® a w Q w J r w ® ® z C m m Z o Q J cQ = C LL J � J z /� W W N W J 1 v a w ■ t z z Y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ✓1 d' V M M N N .-� ti MEMORANDUM DATE: July 5, 2016 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator SUBJECT: 2017 HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL WORK PLAN (MF# BGAP2016-004) Background Pasco entered into a HOME Consortium Agreement with Richland and Kennewick in 1996 making the City eligible for Federal HOME funds. The Agreement was renewed through 2016. Each year an annual action plan is required to be prepared and submitted to HUD for use of estimated funds for the following program year. Estimated Funds Available It is estimated that the 2017 annual entitlement grant to the HOME Consortium will be $430,000. Each member city is allocated an equal share of the entitlement after 10% Set -Aside for Administration and 15% Set -Aside for Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO). Pasco's share of the entitlement is estimated to be $107,000 when the remaining funds are split equally between the three cities. HOME Program income estimated in 2017 is $100,000 and may be used for Down Payment Assistance or an Eligible CHDO Project depending on need. These estimates are based on the 2016 HOME Allocation. There is always some question regarding actual funding levels approved by Congress. Actual available funding for these FY 2017 activities will remain in question until the early part of the year when the HOME allocation is made by Congressional Resolution and an amendment to the Annual Action Plan my be necessary. If funding levels are lower than estimated, activity funding may need to be reallocated accordingly. Any program income received may be allocated for eligible down payment assistance or CHDO development projects. Planning & Administration HUD regulations state that the amount of HOME Funds obligated within a program year to support planning and administration activities may not exceed 10% of the entitlement. This is awarded to Richland annually as the Lead Agency of the HOME Consortium to manage all activities. Member cities are provided funds for planning and administration from 10% of program income received from completed projects within their jurisdiction. CHDO Set -Aside Each year a minimum of 15% of the entitlement grant must be set-aside to help Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO) add to the permanent affordable housing stock. The CHDO set- aside funds may be combined with program income for a development project that will be selected through a competitive RFP process. Proposed Activities HOME funds are based on need and income eligibility and may be used anywhere within the city limits, however, neighborhoods designated as priority by Pasco City Council receive first consideration. Funding is first targeted in the Longfellow and Museum neighborhoods, then within low -moderate income census tracts (201, 202, 203 and 204). If HOME funds cannot be applied to those areas, then they are used as needed within the Pasco City limits for the benefit of eligible low -moderate income families. Staff recommends that anticipated 2017 HOME entitlement funds be allocated to the First Time Homebuyer Down Payment Assistance Program.The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. /arp