Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016.05.23 Council Workshop PacketAGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. May 23, 2016 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 3 -10 (a) 2015 International and State Code Updates 11 - 17 (b) Police Body Cameras 18-21 (c) Increased CIP Spending Authority for the Primary Clarifier Upgrade Project 22-27 (d) Amendment Number 1 to the Professional Services Agreement for the Wastewater System Impact Assessment - Phase I 28-32 (e) Amendment Number 1 to the Professional Services Agreement for the Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Primary Clarifier Upgrade Project 33 -36 (f) Professional Services Agreement for Conceptual Design of Chapel Hill Roadway Extension 37-41 (g) PMC Amendment Setting Penalties for Parking Violations 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 7. ADJOURNMENT. Page 1 of 41 Workshop Meeting REMINDERS: May 23, 2016 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, May 24, TRAC — TRAC Advisory Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS and COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY) 7:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 25, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd — Visit Tri -Cities Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) 11:30 a.m., Wednesday, May 25, Pasco Red Lion — State of the Cities Address. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS) 4:00 p.m., Thursday, May 26, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd — TRIDEC Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 1, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue — Franklin County Mosquito Control District Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.) 5:30 p.m., Thursday, June 2, P&R Classroom — Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER SAUL MARTINEZ, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.) City Hall will be closed on Monday, May 30 in honor of Memorial Day. The next meeting of the Pasco City Council will be held on Monday, June 6, 2016 This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.2ov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 2 of 41 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 17, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 5/23/16 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: 2015 International and State Code Updates I. REFERENCE(S): Draft Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: This code update cycle, the Washington State Building Code Council has established minor revisions to existing regulations pertaining to building, energy, air quality, plumbing and mechanical construction, installation, safety and standards. These regulations and standards are authorized by R.C.W 19.27 and W.A.C. 51-30, 51-34 and 51-35. The amendments are designed to address specific regional issues and enhance uniform building construction codes and standards used by most jurisdictions within the state. The City of Pasco initially adopted the State Building Code in 1998. In 2000, the State and City adopted the International Code set. The amendment process occurs every 3 years in response to State revisions. V. DISCUSSION: Pasco, Kennewick and Richland and most jurisdictions in the state adopt the State Building and Energy Codes in lieu of adopting their own building code. Adoption of the State Building Code with minimal local revisions establishes consistent and reliable standards for the construction industry. Page 3 of 41 The draft ordinance does not contain any local revisions this current update cycle - only those occurring through the mandated State amendment process. Page 4 of 41 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE PASCO MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING THE ADOPTION OF THE WASHINGTON STATE BUILDING CODE AND INTERNATIONAL AND UNIFORM BUILDING CODES. WHEREAS, for the purpose of enforcing the regulations of the City of Pasco, to require compliance with accepted building construction, improvement, modification and safety standards, procedures and practices it is necessary to amend Title 16 of the Pasco Municipal Code. WHEREAS, the State of Washington revised the State Building Code regulations governing the construction, improvement, modification and safety of buildings; and, WHEREAS, revisions and modifications to the State Building Code require that the City amend Title 16 of the Pasco Municipal Code to adopt said revised building law and regulation; and, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 16.04 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 16.04 BUILDING CODE 16.04.010 ADOPTION OF STATE BUILDING CODE, INTERNATIONAL BUILDING AND RESIDENTIAL CODES, CERTAIN APPENDICES AND STANDARDS 16.04.011 BUILDING OFFICIAL -BUILDING INSPECTOR 16.04.012 NON-COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS REQUIRED 16.04.020 SUBSTITUTION FOR IBC SECTION 113 16.04.025 DELETION OF IBC SUBSECTIONS 16.04.035 ADDITION OF IBC SECTION 109.2.1 16.04.040 FEE SCHEDULE 16.04.045 BUILDING INSPECTION FEE 16.04.050 AMENDMENT OF IBC SECTION 110.1 16.04.060 AMENDMENT OF IBC SECTION 110.5 16.04.070 ADDITION OF IBC SECTION 110.6 16.04.080 ELIGIBILITY FOR PERMANENT CITY -PROVIDED UTILITY SERVICES 16.04.090 ADDITION OF IBC SECTION 110.7 16.04.130 AMENDMENT OF SECTION 403.1 16.04.210 AMENDMENT OF IBC SECTION 1805.1 16.04.240 AMENDMENT OF IBC SECTION 1209.2 16.04.295 UNDER FLOOR VENTILATION 16.04.310 VIOLATIONS -PENALTIES Page 5 of 41 16.04.010 ADOPTION OF STATE BUILDING CODE, INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE AND STANDARDS. The City of Pasco hereby adopts the State Building code (RCW 19.27) as thereinafter amended by the Washington State Building Code Council published as Chapter 51-30, Washington Administrative Code, and all provisions thereof applying throughout Title 16 of the Pasco Municipal Code, and adopts by reference, the 21-2 2015 International Building Code and Appendices H, I and J thereof, International Building Code Standards, International Existing Building Code, International Residential Code and Appendix J thereof as published by the International Code Council as thereinafter amended, and all buildings hereinafter erected or constructed, enlarged, repaired, moved, removed, demolished, or converted shall be done in conformity with the provisions of said Codes, except as expressly provided herein. Section 2. That Chapter 16.08 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.08.010 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, ADOPTED. The Uniform Plumbing Code, 21-2 2015 Edition, and the Uniform Plumbing Code Standards, published by the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council and published as Chapters 51-26 and 51-27, Washington State Administrative Code is adopted as the plumbing code of the City except as hereinafter amended, and provided that Chapter 12 regarding Fuel Gas Piping of the Uniform Plumbing Code is not adopted. 16.08.015 ADOPTION OF STATE DELETED SECTION OF UPC. Uniform Plumbing Code Chapter 7, Part II as published in the 2 -OW latemational Plumbing 2015 Uniform Plumbing Code is hereby adopted. Section 3. That Chapter 16.12 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.12.030 SCOPE. All gas appliances or gas pipes hereafter sold, installed, maintained, or repaired within the City limits shall conform to the requirements of the 2009 2015 International Mechanical Code as adopted by the City. All gas transmission and/or distribution systems hereafter constructed, installed, operated, and maintained within the City shall conform to the requirements of this chapter. 16.12.350 ADOPTION OF STANDARDS BY REFERENCE. The following, and as the same also may hereafter be amended, are adopted by reference and shall be observed: (1) Appliances: (a) 241-2 2015 International Mechanical Code, 24Q 2015 International Fuel Gas code, 2011 NFPA 58 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, and 2012 NFPA 54 National Fuel Gas Code. (2) Gas transmission and distribution system: (a) The American Standard Code for Pressure Piping, Section 8, Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems (ASA B 31.1-1955). (b) The State rules and regulations of the Washington Public Service Commission applicable to gas transmission and/or distribution utilities and safety standards and rules and regulations of the State Department of Labor and Industries. Ordinance Amending Title 16 Page 2 Page 6 of 41 Section 4. That Chapter 16.16 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.16.010 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE. The International Property Maintenance Code, 241-2 2015 Edition, prepared by the International Code Council, as thereinafter amended or revised, is adopted by the City as its official Housing Code. Section 5. That Chapter 16.18 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.18.030 BOARD OF APPEALS. In order to determine the suitability of alternative materials and methods of construction and/or installation and provide for reasonable interpretation of the provisions of the Energy Code, the Board of Appeals, created pursuant to Section 113 of the 241-2 2015 International Building Code as amended by Section 16.04.020 of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall hear appeals and make determinations arising out of or in connection with the decisions of the building official. When it is claimed that the provisions of this code do not apply or that the true intent or meaning of this code has been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may, within 30 days of the decision, appeal to the Board of Appeals. Section 6. That Chapter 16.19 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby repealed in its entirety: inm irawlia wamwiKTAI . . •._ KV M IralawalMIAK&M @I UVOIN VAN'l. _.N I WV•. . . SIM I. ..• • • I. 1 U- ON 01, .. .,, --- �. M11101 P. - - • Ordinance Amending Title 16 Page 3 Page 7 of 41 Section 7. That Chapter 16.32 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.32.010 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE, NFPA 58 LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS CODE, AND NFPA NATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE, ADOPTED. The 281-2 2015 International Mechanical Code, 282 2015 International Fuel Gas Code, 2011 NFPA 58 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, and 2012 NFPA 54 National Fuel Gas Code, as published by the International Code Council and the National Fire Protection Association, as thereafter amended or revised by the Washington State Building Code Council and published as Chapter 51-22 Washington Administrative Code, is adopted as the mechanical code of the City, except as hereinafter amended. Section 8. That Chapter 16.36 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 16.36 SWIMMING POOL, SPA, AND HOT TUB CODE Sections: 16.36.010 SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, ADOPTED ......................4 16.36.020 SUBSTITUTION FOR 1RG SECTION n G i ncz ISPSC SECTION 305.2.1 PARAGRAPH 1 FENCES....................................................................................................4 16.36.030 NEW SECTION ADDED - ZONING REGULATIONS ..................................... 16.36.010 SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, ADOPTED. Appendix G; Swimming Pools, Spas and Not Tubs published in the 2012-Mteffl-atiefial Residential 12015 International swimming pool and spa code as Published by the International Code Council, hereinafter amended or revised, is adopted by the City as its official swimming pool, spa and hot tub code, by reference therein. (Ord. 4108, 2013; Ord. 3964, 2010; Ord. 3670 Sec. 11, 2004; Ord. 3316 Sec. 13, 1998.) 16.36.020 SUBSTITUTION FOR I -RG ISPSC SECTION ^ r�i 305.2.1 PARAGRAPH 1 FENCES. All outdoor swimming pools shall be enclosed by a non -climbable fence or other approved barrier, such fence or approved barrier to be not less than five (5) feet in height and provided with a self-closing gate or gates equipped with a latch or locking device operable only from the pool side of the fence or by a locking device operable by a key only on the outside of the fence. Said fence or barrier shall be no closer than three (3) feet from the Ordinance Amending Title 16 Page 4 Page 8 of 41 .rsezr. " . . wm •0 P.M INTO• Section 7. That Chapter 16.32 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 16.32.010 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE, INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE, NFPA 58 LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS CODE, AND NFPA NATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE, ADOPTED. The 281-2 2015 International Mechanical Code, 282 2015 International Fuel Gas Code, 2011 NFPA 58 Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, and 2012 NFPA 54 National Fuel Gas Code, as published by the International Code Council and the National Fire Protection Association, as thereafter amended or revised by the Washington State Building Code Council and published as Chapter 51-22 Washington Administrative Code, is adopted as the mechanical code of the City, except as hereinafter amended. Section 8. That Chapter 16.36 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 16.36 SWIMMING POOL, SPA, AND HOT TUB CODE Sections: 16.36.010 SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, ADOPTED ......................4 16.36.020 SUBSTITUTION FOR 1RG SECTION n G i ncz ISPSC SECTION 305.2.1 PARAGRAPH 1 FENCES....................................................................................................4 16.36.030 NEW SECTION ADDED - ZONING REGULATIONS ..................................... 16.36.010 SWIMMING POOL, SPA AND HOT TUB CODE, ADOPTED. Appendix G; Swimming Pools, Spas and Not Tubs published in the 2012-Mteffl-atiefial Residential 12015 International swimming pool and spa code as Published by the International Code Council, hereinafter amended or revised, is adopted by the City as its official swimming pool, spa and hot tub code, by reference therein. (Ord. 4108, 2013; Ord. 3964, 2010; Ord. 3670 Sec. 11, 2004; Ord. 3316 Sec. 13, 1998.) 16.36.020 SUBSTITUTION FOR I -RG ISPSC SECTION ^ r�i 305.2.1 PARAGRAPH 1 FENCES. All outdoor swimming pools shall be enclosed by a non -climbable fence or other approved barrier, such fence or approved barrier to be not less than five (5) feet in height and provided with a self-closing gate or gates equipped with a latch or locking device operable only from the pool side of the fence or by a locking device operable by a key only on the outside of the fence. Said fence or barrier shall be no closer than three (3) feet from the Ordinance Amending Title 16 Page 4 Page 8 of 41 water's edge on all sides of the pool and the maximum vertical clearance between grade and the bottom of the barrier shall not exceed two (2) inches, measured on the side of the fence or barrier which faces away from the swimming pool, spa or hot tub. 16.40.010 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE, ADOPTED. (a) There is adopted by the City Council of the City, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35.21.289 and RCW 19.27 for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire or explosion, that certain code and standards known as the International Fire Code, including Appendix Chapters A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I and J being in particular the 21-2 2015editions thereof and the whole thereof, as amended by the Washington State Building Code Council and published as Chapters 51-34 and 51-35 Washington Administrative Code, save and except such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified or amended, and the same are adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein and from the date on which the ordinance codified in this chapter shall take effect, the provision thereof shall be controlling within the corporate limits of the City. (b) It is the specific intent of the Fire Code of the City as herein adopted, modified and amended, to place the obligation of complying with its requirements upon the owners and occupiers of the buildings and premises within the scope, and no provision of nor any term used in this Fire Code is intended to impose any duty whatsoever upon the City or any of its officers or employees, for whom the implementation and enforcement of this Fire Code shall be discretionary and not mandatory. (c) Nothing contained in this Fire Code is intended to be nor shall be construed to create or form the basis for any injury or damage resulting from the failure of a building or any premises to comply with provisions of this Fire Code, or by reason or in consequence of any inspection, notice, order, certificate, permission or approval authorized or issued or done in connection with the implementation or enforcement of this Fire Code, or by reason of any action or inaction on the part of the City, related in any manner to the enforcement of this Fire Code by its officers, employees or agents. (d) It is expressly the purpose of this Fire Code to provide for and promote the health, safety and welfare of the general public, and not to create or otherwise establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially protected or benefited by the provisions of this Fire Code. 16.40.040 ADOPTION OF STATE DELETED SECTIONS OF THE IFC — CHAPTER 3 AND CHAPTER 5. Chapter 3 Section 308.1.4 and Chapter 5 Sections 503.1, 503.1.1, 503.1.2, 503.1.3, 503.2, 503.3, 503.4 as published in the 241-2 2015 International Fire Code are hereby adopted. 16.40.100 AMENDMENT TO SECTION 109.4 VIOLATIONS AND PENALITES OF THE IFC. Section 109.4 of the 24 2 2015 International Fire Code is amended to read as follows: Section 109.4 Violations — Penalties: Any person, firm or corporation violating a provision of this chapter which is not also a violation of any other provisions of this Title or the codes adopted thereby, or shall fail to comply with the requirements thereof or who shall erect, install, alter, repair, or do work in violation of the approved construction documents or direction of the fire code official, or of a permit or certificate used under the provisions of this chapter, or operate or maintain an occupancy, premises, or vehicle subject to this chapter who allow a hazard to exist or fail to take immediate action to abate a hazard on such occupancy, premises, or vehicle Ordinance Amending Title 16 Page 5 Page 9 of 41 when ordered to do so by the fire code official, shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor. Each day that violation continues after due notice has been served, shall be deemed a separate offense. Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of June, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Ordinance Amending Title 16 Page 6 Page 10 of 41 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 17, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 5/23/16 FROM: Bob Metzger, Police Chief Police Department SUBJECT: Police Body Cameras I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Over the past year, the Police Department has been reviewing the use of body cameras as part of an effort at transparency. New in -car cameras were placed in vehicles last year that are adaptable for body camera use. The concern at that time was that the use of the body camera as it relates to public records and privacy. In the 2016 legislative session, House Bill 2362, was passed into law, and authorized the deployment of body -worn video cameras and gave specific exemptions from public records laws. The caveat to this law was that for a department to fall under the exemptions outlined, a city ordinance should be in place, the department must have a policy in place, and body cameras must be used by June 9, 2016. The Department has put together a policy on body camera use (attached as Exhibit 1 to the Ordinance). The Department has also obtained a demonstration camera for use by officers from the vendor of the in -car cameras. By adopting the ordinance, having the policy in place and obtaining this demonstration camera, the Department will be in compliance with the law and the exemptions permitted will apply. Page 11 of 41 V. DISCUSSION: At this time the Department will be reviewing grants and other funding opportunities to fully implement body cameras for all patrol officers. Council will be updated on this as it moves forward. Page 12 of 41 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington authorizing the use of Body -Worn Cameras for Law Enforcement Personnel. WHEREAS, the Washington legislature by Engrossed House Bill 2362 has authorized the use of body -worn video cameras in law enforcement and corrections agencies and provided specific regulations and exemptions for body -worn camera recordings as public records; and WHEREAS, the Washington legislature has strongly encouraged the legislative authority of each city and town to adopt an ordinance or resolution authorizing the use of body -worn cameras prior to their use by law enforcement officers; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the 6th day of June, 2016, and solicited community involvement by notices posted on the City's website and as provided to the news media inviting input into the development of operational policies governing the use of body - worn cameras; and WHEREAS, as a result of such input and investigation by City staff, the City intends to implement a program within the Pasco Police Department that deploys and utilizes body -worn video cameras and intends this Ordinance to be evidence of such intent as well as setting forth the requirements for an operational policy regulating the deployment and use of such cameras and authorizing the adoption of policy regarding the use of such cameras; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City of Pasco, pursuant by Engrossed House Bill 2362, authorizes the deployment by the Pasco Police Department of body -worn video cameras and to implement an operational policy regarding the use of such cameras that includes those elements as required by Section 5 of Engrossed House Bill 2362. Section 2. The initial operational policy for the deployment of body -worn cameras, as attached as Exhibit No. 1, is approved subject to future administrative changes resulting from the change in the law, case law, operational and technical requirements, and best practices. For the purpose of this Ordinance, body -worn cameras are considered deployed upon approval of the operational policy, limited, periodic use, including on a trial or pilot basis. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage, and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this day of 12016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 13 of 41 EXHIBIT 1 Pasco Police Department Policy Manual Effective Date Policy Number 05/18/2016 41 Subject Body Worn Cameras Reference By Authority of, 41.3.9 Robert Metzger, Chief of Police Distribution Review/Revision Date No. Pages All Department Personnel 05/01/2017 4 I. PURPOSE This policy is intended to provide officers with instructions on when and how to use body -worn cameras (BWCs) so that officers may reliably record their contacts with the public in accordance with the law. II. POLICY It is the policy of this department that officers shall activate the BWC when such use is appropriate to the proper performance of his or her official duties, where the recordings are consistent with this policy and law. This policy does not govern the use of surreptitious recording devices used in undercover operations. II1. PROCEDURES A. Administration This agency has adopted the use of the BWC to accomplish several objectives. The primary objectives are as follows: 1. BWCs allow for accurate documentation of police -public contacts, arrests, and critical incidents. They also serve to enhance the accuracy of officer reports and testimony in court. 2. Audio and video recordings also enhance this agency's ability to review probable cause for arrest, officer and suspect interaction, and evidence for investigative and prosecutorial purposes and to provide additional information for officer evaluation and training. 3. The BWC may also be useful in documenting crime and accident scenes or other events that include the confiscation and documentation of evidence or contraband. B. When and How to Use the BWC 1. Officers shall activate the BWC to record all contacts with citizens in the performance of official duties. Chapter - Body Worn Cameras Page 1 of 4 Page 14 of 41 EXHIBIT 1 Pasco Police Department Policy Manual 2. Whenever possible, officers should inform individuals that they are being recorded. In locations where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as a residence, they may decline to be recorded unless the recording is being made in pursuant to an arrest or search of the residence or the individuals. The BWC shall remain activated until the event is completed in order to ensure the integrity of the recording unless the contact moves into an area restricted by this policy (see items D.1-4). 3. If an officer fails to activate the BWC, fails to record the entire contact, or interrupts the recording, the officer shall document why a recording was not made, was interrupted, or was terminated. 4. Civilians shall not be allowed to review the recordings at the scene. C. Procedures for BWC Use 1. BWC equipment is issued primarily to uniformed personnel as authorized by this agency. Officers who are assigned BWC equipment must use the equipment unless otherwise authorized by supervisory personnel. 2. Police personnel shall use only BWCs issued by this department. The BWC equipment and all data, images, video, and metadata captured, recorded, or otherwise produced by the equipment is the sole property of the agency. 3. Police personnel who are assigned BWCs must complete an agency approved and/or provided training program to ensure proper use and operations. Additional training may be required at periodic intervals to ensure the continued effective use and operation of the equipment, proper calibration and performance, and to incorporate changes, updates, or other revisions in policy and equipment. 4. BWC equipment is the responsibility of individual officers and will be used with reasonable care to ensure proper functioning. Equipment malfunctions shall be brought to the attention of the officer's supervisor as soon as possible so that a replacement unit may be procured. 5. Officers shall inspect and test the BWC prior to each shift in order to verify proper functioning and shall notify their supervisor of any problems. 6. Officers shall not edit, alter, erase, duplicate, copy, share, or otherwise distribute in any manner BWC recordings without prior written authorization and approval of the chief executive officer (CEO) or his or her designee. 7. Officers are encouraged to inform their supervisor of any recordings that may be of value for training purposes. Chapter - Body Worn Cameras Page 2 of 4 Page 15 of 41 EXHIBIT 1 Pasco Police Department Policy Manual 8. If an officer is suspected of wrongdoing or involved in an officer -involved shooting or other serious use of force, the department reserves the right to limit or restrict an officer from viewing the video file. 9. Requests for deletion of portions of the recordings (e.g., in the event of a personal recording) must be submitted in writing and approved by the chief executive officer or his or her designee in accordance with state record retention laws. All requests and final decisions shall be kept on file. 10. Officers shall note in incident, arrest, and related reports when recordings were made during the incident in question. However, BWC recordings are not a replacement for written reports. D. Restrictions on Using the BWC BWCs shall be used only in conjunction with official law enforcement duties. The BWC shall not generally be used to record: 1. Communications with other police personnel without the permission of the chief executive officer (CEO); 2. Encounters with undercover officers or confidential informants; 3. When on break or otherwise engaged in personal activities; or 4. In any location where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as a restroom or locker room. E. Storage 1. All files' shall be securely downloaded periodically and no later than the end of each shift. Each file shall contain information related to the date, BWC identifier, and assigned officer. 2. All images and sounds recorded by the BWC are the exclusive property of this department. Accessing, copying, or releasing files for non -law enforcement purposes is strictly prohibited. 3. All access to BWC data (images, sounds, and metadata) must be specifically authorized by the CEO or his or her designee, and all access is to be audited to ensure that only authorized users are accessing the data for legitimate and authorized purposes. 1 For the purpose of this document, the term "file" refers to all sounds, images, and associated metadata. Chapter - Body Worn Cameras Page 3 of 4 Page 16 of 41 EXHIBIT 1 Pasco Police Department Policy Manual 4. Files should be securely stored in accordance with state records retention laws and no longer than useful for purposes of training or for use in an investigation or prosecution. In capital punishment prosecutions, recordings shall be kept until the offender is no longer under control of a criminal justice agency. F. Supervisory Responsibilities 1. Supervisory personnel shall ensure that officers equipped with BWC devices utilize them in accordance with policy and procedures defined herein. 2. At least on a monthly basis, supervisors will randomly review BWC recordings to ensure that the equipment is operating properly and that officers are using the devices appropriately and in accordance with policy and to identify any areas in which additional training or guidance is required. Chapter - Body Worn Cameras Page 4 of 4 Page 17 of 41 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works May 16, 2016 Workshop Meeting: 5/23/16 SUBJECT: Increased CIP Spending Authority for the Primary Clarifier Upgrade Project I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: 2013/2015 Water and Sewer Bond - $663,253 Current Total Budget - $4,800,255 Requested Allocation - $663,253 Total Requested Budget - $5,463,508 The funds are available in the 2013/2015 bond for water and sewer projects to cover this increased amount and will need to be allocated to this project. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In Spring of 2014, the City Council adopted the City's Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The Plan identifies strategies and outlines the capital improvement to address current and future needs. One of the high priority projects is construction of an additional primary clarifier. The existing clarifiers are nearing design capacity and a third primary clarifier is needed in order to meet the future growth within the system. This is the first phase of improvements to increase the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant from its current 7 million gallons a day (MGD) to 12 MGD. Page 18 of 41 In May 2014 and March 2015, the City Council awarded a Professional Services Agreement to HDR in the amount of $298,000 to complete the design of a primary clarifier and primary pump room. The Construction contract for the project was advertised in the newspaper on April 5 and April 12, 2015. Clearwater Construction & Management was the lowest responsible bidder at $4,634,287.80. Council approved this contract on August 3, 2015. The Construction Management and Inspection Services contract was advertised in the newspaper on July 19 and July 26, 2015 with the submittal of the consultant's qualifications due August 11, 2015. Four submittals were received from consulting firms. Gray & Osborne, Inc. was unanimously selected by the selection committee. A Professional Services Agreement was signed on September 23, 2015 for $293,740 with the understanding that a portion of the construction management would be completed by City Staff. V. DISCUSSION: Additional expenses for this project, in excess of what was originally budgeted, include change orders during the construction, additional scope added to the construction management services, and assistance from the design consultant to answer design intent questions during the construction. This cost increase is largely due to the complexity of this project. The City has saved $51,013 through value engineering options identified by the construction company during the construction of this project. The funds are available in the 2013/2015 bond for water and sewer projects to cover this increased amount and will need to be allocated to this project. Staff recommends approving the increased spending authority for the primary clarifier upgrade project. Page 19 of 41 ISSUE OAT. ....plo. Y0.W.CT -- Process Mechanical J. ZPMIer PRIMARY CLARIFIER 1 e o � UPGRADE OVERALL ISOMETRIC VIEW -- s.�el,.ra o. zehner [�Irtea meln,m. i. rcoePP IMN aeeign eea/oc J. Keen ru.xnM. 5H eO ® acus v^ OOZ-01 ISSUE OAT. ....plo. Y0.W.CT /rl r ds - + r •STT �-.+��' m � i i h 4a is w IA 17 ir rPROPOSED LOCATION OF EW PRIMARY CLARIFIER ,1 V N 0 Ht Y AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works May 16, 2016 Workshop Meeting: 5/23/16 SUBJECT: Amendment Number 1 to the Professional Services Agreement for the Wastewater System Impact Assessment - Phase I I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map MSA Request for Extension Letter Professional Services Agreement Summary Sheet II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Utility Fund (Sewer) - Not to exceed $76,513 Contract funding will be paid from the 2016 Utility Fund (Sewer) ending fund balance. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In spring of 2014, the City Council adopted the City's Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The Plan identifies strategies and outlines future capital improvements necessary to address current and future flow and loading to the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The Department of Ecology (Ecology) previously issued an order delegating management of the industrial permitting and pretreatment to the City; a role Ecology has historically served. In the months following Ecology's Order, the City worked to prepare and adopt ordinances and developed a program to implement this new regulatory responsibility. The adopted Pretreatment Ordinance establishes limits and outlines other requirements for discharge of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Soluble BOD and other constitutes. Additionally, the WWTP began experiencing high levels of BOD and Soluble BOD inflow in 2014. This additional loading to the system Page 22 of 41 has resulted in operational challenges and concerns. While the Sanitary Sewer Master Plan is a necessary and valuable planning tool, the document takes a very high level view in terms of day-to-day operation. The changes in loading to the WWTP, regulatory responsibilities, and implementation of the pretreatment program necessitate a much more targeted assessment of the WWTP processes and control of organic loading to the WWTP. The recommended technical assessment will focus on the optimization of plant operations, control of plant loadings, and compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. While the higher loadings of BOD and Soluble BOD to the WWTP are a relatively recent occurrence, as an agricultural processing hub, the City anticipates their continuation until such flows can be diverted to the Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF). Conducting the proposed assessment is a proactive step that will ultimately expedite actions necessary in the near future to optimize pretreatment efforts and optimize the operation of the WWTP. One such example is the possibility of partnering with industrial users on public/private joint improvements for the pretreatment process. As a relevant side note, Ecology's approval of the City's Sanitary Sewer Master Plan was predicated on the condition that the City ultimately discontinue the discharge of food processing wastewater to the municipal WWTP and divert it to the PWRF. Staff is working with Ecology to develop a master plan to pave the way to connect the current and future processors to the PWRF. V. DISCUSSION: The City contracted with Murray Smith & Associates (MSA) in May 2015 to conduct a specialized assessment of the WWTP. MSA and the City had developed a work plan that was intended to investigate the fluctuating wastewater flows to (1) help reduce the impacts in the short-term and (2) evaluate alternatives and select improvements to address impacts in the long-term. To accomplish these goals requires three distinct project phases. MSA's scoping includes the following major milestones: Phase 1 — Short-term impact assessment and mitigation options. Phase 2 — Long-term impact assessment and needs. Phase 3 — Long-term alternatives analysis and planning. The original scope of the Phase 1 — Short -Term Impact Assessment and Mitigation Options included the assumption that a portion of food processor's wastewater would be diverted to the PWRF. Due to limited capacity at the PWRF, the portion of the wastewater was not diverted; thus affecting the results of the assessment and the recommended mitigation options. With this change in scope, MSA required additional Page 23 of 41 funds to recreate the assessment and provide alternate mitigation options. Staff recommends approval of the Amendment Number 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with MSA which covers Phase 1 work, completion of a short-term impact assessment, and mitigation options. Page 24 of 41 �` * - o T_ , app Am LT - Uk " D +4 rt - City of Pasco Wastewater Treatment Plant t i FE Pasco City of Pasco Wastewater Treatment Plant F ken hewi { r w 15-1651 December 21, 2015 Ms. Leah Fisk Associate Engineer City of Pasco — Public Works Department 525 N Third Street Pasco, WA 99301 Re: Contract Amendment Dear Leah: 345 W Bobdiite Court, Suite 230 Boise. ID 8370&3943 NI0NE 208.947.9033 FAX 2118.996S 101 As requested, I am sending you this letter to document the additional budget needs for our work on the Short -Term Wastewater System Impact Assessment project. When we initiated this work, we were told that roughly 30% of the flow from Grimmway Farms would be diverted to the City's Industrial Wastewater Treatment Facility. Unfortunately, we now understand that this diversion will not occur and the majority of our analysis is already complete. Since both the City's Commercial -Kahlotus Lift Station and Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant were already found to be near their capacity, even with the diversion, we will need to quickly redo and complete a more refined analysis in order to address handling all of Grimmway Foods' flow and load in 2016. Since Grimmway Foods will start discharging wastewater as early as mid-June, we will proceed immediately with updating our analysis in an effort to complete it in time for the City to implement any short-term improvements that may be necessary. To cover this additional work, we have estimated that roughly $25,000 to $30,000 of additional budget will be necessary. In order to mitigate the additional costs some, we propose to present our analysis results via PowerPoint presentation in lieu of the previously scoped technical memoranda. If you have any concerns or comments regarding this additional work and the required budget amendment, please let me know. Sincerely, MURRAY, SMITH &_ASSOCIATES, INC. 1A Craig B Ar@erson, F.E. Principal Engineer Page 26 of 41 Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: Short-term Wastewater System Impact Assessment Consultant: Murray, Smith & Associates, Inc. Address: 601 Union Street, Suite 622, Seattle, WA 98101 Scope of Services: To evaluate the short-term impact on the City's wastewater treatment plant and sewer collection system due to additional wastewater flows from industrial users and provide mitigation __ options. Term: 95 calendar days Completion Date: December 31, 2016 Payments to Consultant: ❑ Hourly Rate: $ ❑ Fixed Sum of $ 0 Other: Not to exceed $76.513 Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: ❑ $1,000,000 each occurrence; ❑ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or ® $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: ❑ $1,000,000 per claim; ❑ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or 0 $1,000,000 per claim; and $2,000,000 per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Signature by: ❑ Mayor ® City Manager Page 27 of 41 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works May 16, 2016 Workshop Meeting: 5/23/16 SUBJECT: Amendment Number 1 to the Professional Services Agreement for the Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Primary Clarifier Upgrade Project I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Professional Services Agreement Summary II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Water and Sewer Bond - $197,421 Original PSA - $293,740 Amendment - $197,421 Total contract - $491,161 An increase in the total budget is not required for this contract amendment. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In Spring of 2014, the City Council adopted the City's Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The Plan identifies strategies and outlines the capital improvement to address current and future needs. One of the high priority projects is construction of an additional primary clarifier. The existing clarifiers are nearing design capacity and a third primary clarifier is needed in order to meet the future growth within the system. This is the first phase of improvements to increase the capacity of the wastewater treatment plant from its current 7 million gallons a day (MGD) to 12 MGD. Page 28 of 41 In May 2014 and March 2015, the City Council awarded a Professional Services Agreement to HDR in the amount of $298,000 to complete the design of a primary clarifier and primary pump room. The Construction contract for the project was advertised in the newspaper on April 5 and April 12, 2015. Clearwater Construction & Management was the lowest responsible bidder at $4,634,287.80. Council approved this contract on August 3, 2015. The Construction Management and Inspection Services contract was advertised in the newspaper on July 19 and July 26, 2015 with the submittal of the consultant's qualifications due August 11, 2015. Four submittals were received from consulting firms. Gray & Osborne, Inc. was unanimously selected by the selection committee. A Professional Services Agreement was signed on September 23, 2015 for $293,740 with the understanding that a portion of the construction management would be completed by City Staff. V. DISCUSSION: Staff with a role managing sewer operations and engineering have been involved throughout the project design and scope for input and training. Our goal included determining how much of the project management and inspection can be completed in- house. Upgrade construction projects happen infrequently at wastewater treatment plants and involve very specialized construction. Since the project is so specialized, its management and inspection also requires specialized training and experience. Therefore, portions of the project are outside of staff expertise. The assistance of a consultant whose expertise is the design and construction of wastewater treatment plants is needed and would greatly benefit this project. Originally it was intended that the City would manage a portion of the construction management in-house. Due to staffing constraints, this work in its entirety is no longer able to be performed internally. This scope of work includes updating the O&M manual, reviewing submittals for programming the programmable logic controller (PLC) and assistance with startup and troubleshooting, reviewing submittals of equipment O&M manuals, preparing record drawings, and continuing construction inspection. This scope also includes design assistance related to change orders that have occurred during the construction. An increase in the total budget is not required for this contract amendment. Staff recommends the approval of the amendment number 1 to the Professional Service Agreement with Gray & Osborne, Inc. Page 29 of 41 ISSUE OAT. ....plo. Y0.W.CT -- Process Mechanical J. ZPMIer PRIMARY CLARIFIER 1 e o � UPGRADE OVERALL ISOMETRIC VIEW -- s.�el,.ra o. zehner [�Irtea meln,m. i. rcoePP IMN aeeign eea/oc J. Keen ru.xnM. 5H eO ® acus v^ OOZ-01 ISSUE OAT. ....plo. Y0.W.CT /rl r ds - + r •STT �-.+��' m � i i h 4a is w IA 17 ir rPROPOSED LOCATION OF EW PRIMARY CLARIFIER ,1 V W O Ht Y Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: Construction Management & Inspection Services of Primary Clarifier Upgrade Project Consultant: Gray & Osborne, Inc. Address: 107 S. 3rd Street, Yakima, WA 98901 Scope of Services: To provide Construction Management and Inspection Services during the construction of the primary clarifier upgrades. Term: Completion Date: to be determined based on Construction Schedule Payments to Consultant: ❑ Hourly Rate: $ ❑ Fixed Sum of. $ ® Other: not to exceed $491,161 Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: ❑ $1,000,000 each occurrence; ❑ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or ® $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: ® $1,000,000 per claim; ❑ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or ❑ $ per claim; and $ per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Signature by: ❑ Mayor 0 City Manager Page 32 of 41 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 23, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 5/23/16 FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for Conceptual Design of Chapel Hill Roadway Extension I. REFERENCE(S): Area Map - DNR Property Professional Services Agreement Summary II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: During 2016, the conceptual design cost will be incurred in the amount of approximately $54,444. The cost will initially be financed by the City using funds from the LID Guarantee End Fund Balance, to be later reimbursed through the issuance of LID Bonds for the Chapel Hill Boulevard project. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Chapel Hill Boulevard is a critical future connection that will provide an east to west connection between Road 68 and Road 84 and a parallel access for I-182. The corridor will provide an alternate route to avoid congestion at Road 68. On February 1, 2016, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 3690 that declared their intent to form an LID for the purpose of improving Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, and Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard, with full roadway improvements that include road construction including curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, bike lanes and landscaping. In 2014, the City coordinated with DNR on zoning of the property and partitioned the property into large lots in order to facilitate its sale at auction. As part of the process, Page 33 of 41 the City completed, utilizing the engineering firm of TranTech Engineering, a 5% design effort to establish roadway alignment for Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76. Staff have been in enaged in working with DNR to help develop a plan for moving the project forwad. Additionally, in order to reduce the cost of the overall LID, grant agencies have been contacted to seek possible fundings. Prior to submitting requests for any grants, we need to further develop the 5% plans to meet the future capacity demand, confirm the cross section of the roadway, and develop access management, intersection spacing and a refined cost estimate. V. DISCUSSION: To move the LID forward, conceptual design of the intended improvements is the next logical step. Additionally, completion of design will start after the LID has been established. Currently it is a goal to complete the construction plans and documents by the end of 2016. This would allow the opportunity to bid the improvements early the following year, which in turn will most likely yield the best unit prices. At the time the consultant was hired to conduct the 5% effort, TranTech Engineering was selected from among the qualified engineering firms on the City roster. TranTech Engineering has an office in the City of Pasco and has successfully worked for the City in the past. Staff is recommending that TranTech Engineering continue forward to complete design of the intended improvements. Page 34 of 41 CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE AMENDMENT N 89'15'45" E 2625.87'_ _ CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC LENGTH LINE BEARING DISTANCE Cl 5'40'00" 537.28' 53.14' L1 S 76'37'50" E 36.41' PASCO 16 6 tsso' c2 9'z0'ao" 442.59 72.10' L2 S 70.57.50" E 1064.42' SEGREGATION SURVEY C3 26'40'00" 143.32' 66.70' L3 S 61'3750" E 192.19' C410'50'00" 313.65' 59.30' L4 S 61'3750" E 94.85' S 8 CS 20'40'00" 83.30' 30.05' L5 S 88'17'50" E 96.38' 656. C6 25'10'00 83.32 36.60' L6 N 80'52'10" E 107.96' IS"F - C7 20'50'00" 171.79' 62 46' L7 5 78'27'50" E 40.37' 4 50 Bsq 9 o C8 35'30'00" 143.39' 88.84' LB 5 53'17'50" E 87.37' r 'zs' 1 11 C9 28'20'00" 6445' 31.87' L9 S 74'07 50 E 38.20' THIS SEGREGATION SURVEY IS TO g sN CID 27'30'00" 64.42' 30.92 710 N 70'22'10" E 127.55' AMEND AND REPLACE L 16 `R50' S E6 h'gpF[ 3q S Cit 1'25'15" 110.97' 2.97' L11 S 81'1750" E 316.05' SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED LED UNDER 1�� 1,A, 3 C12 6447'11" 500.00' 565.37' L12 S 53'47'50" E 83.51' AFN. 1828912 RECORDS OF 50' f T �(VD fq Ry, NSA+ oC13 85'39'07" 550.00' 822.20' L13 S 52'54'05" E 206.16' FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. BSC14 554807" 550.00' 535.66' L14 S 6656'15" E 100.00' THE NEW LOT CONFIGURATION C. 4,CL( C15 53'26'29" 500.00' 466.36' Lis S 66'56'15" E 270.00' CREATES 7 LOTS INSTEAD OF 11 i0-> g7F'0 C16 38'57'45" 900.00' 612.02' L16 S 68'38'07" E 143.05' LOTS. \\� 7 9>) C17 21'29'49" 520.00' 195.10' L17 S 44'1640" E 133.64' �>'{ 100 cis 41'40'42" 540.00' 392.81' L18 N 86'23'21" E 173.44' EGRESS AND UTILITIES \�FOR INGRESS, C19 26'13'19" 340.00' 155.60' L19 N 78'20'30" E 100.00' n EGRESS <! pip C2 39'53'32" 490.00' 341.16' 72 S 87'29'37" E 87.36' 1" = 400 FEET C211 02'54'1 B" 2865.00' 145.26' 72 1 S 87'29'37" E 7.61' 11565, 9 /IS L22 N 2431'45" W 85.64' 0 200 400 800 Oo // \ \ 1 LT WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM o LOT 1 i \ 6 SOUTH ZONE, NA083191 N 37.86 Ac 7res 1 ,s BASIS OF BEARING: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES. m o I WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83/91 SOUTH ZONE DATA TRIMBLE R8/2 GPS RECEIVER. INITIAL CONTROL POINTS z / FROM FRANKLIN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT WERE ESTABLISHED FROM TIES TO THE WSRN NETWORK CONTROL POINT N0. 1511 N: 341159.34 E. 1974390.99 AND THEN CONSTRAINED TO FRANKLIN REGIONAL CONTROL LOT tr o 3 ,ham1969027,01POINT NO'S: 1511 AND 1507 CORNERS WERE DUALLY TIED TO M CONTROL POINT N0, 1507 N: 339246.30 E ESTABLISH 2 MEASUREMENTS. THE RELATIVE ACCURACY 102.72 Acres o N 89'17'14" E 1319.62 - STANDARDS WERE MET AS SPECIFIED IN WAC 332-130-080. O n 2 0 E E DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCE 1'-40' R/W FOR INGRESS I I Q - `i hOh o O h030 COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.99991342 EGRESS AND UTILITIES 1 1 o N 6 NN n' -N 65 +E ,� LEGEND: LOT 3 LOT 7 tio' ►�� • FOUND MONUMENT. 5 00'32'53" W o R ^ w \ a 59.50 Acres 21.¢7 Acres \ \\ 265.06' C� g CALCULATED CORNER R50' L21 \ � �I L21 C18 Lib Lig � O FOUND REBARS NOT ACCEPTED 1322.08' ��� �- S 89'17'14" W 2642.59' 4" E^� z2111.16, L2a 'ice 1 N 89'17 1 !'�& FOUND ROADWAY MONUMENTS R50' I R50? 40 - 40 SEE SHEET 3 FOR CORNER NOTES SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES rm m IGD' R/W FOR INGRESS, �1 j 3 n 50 EGRESS AND UTILITIES CHAPEL HILL N j oll;° w a o _ -s Bsm's9" / \ 50 �- _356,76'_ _ _ _ E 1285.87'c -92911 _ _� s .81' = 167 .93'---- _ --- LOT 4 N r� 1 \ \ \ o / / \ I COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION �zg 80' R/W FOR INGRESS. Ir 38.09 Acres , LOT 6 1 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON EG RESS\NO UTILITIES -I z / / I COUNTY OF THURSTON 13.11 ACRES E 65.9>-� / 1046.97' 1 " N RP I, PETER GOLDMARK, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ACTING FOR THE DEPARTMENT o IT- \ N 89'17 40 E OF NA RAL RESOURCES, IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY CERTIFTHAT THE MAP ENTITLED "AMENDMENT PASCO 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY UPON WHICH CZ 73 L7 __-_3-_ / /vi N \ 1 THIS CERTIFICATE IS INSCRIBED, IS PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF o 2 -- - _ y'c N 34'40'19" E RADIAL 1 \ WASHINGTON STATE LAWS, 2013 SOD SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 19, SECTION 3238 C3 ``�� 1 L L12 110'97 FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PER CHAPTER 79.11 ROW. C4 CSCE I L4 C>� / C9 \ _ _ - _ °9 IT IS ALSO NOTED THAT A DULY AUTHENTICATED COPY OF THIS MAP SHALL BE FILED _ I Lg CB / / 0>0 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE C11 ORIGINAL COPY SHALL BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC ,� III m 3 I / / c _� w LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WA. Q SEE SHEET 2 f o z LOT 5 N ` O FOR DETAIL 3 o w o / / n ? WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE ----- _ DAY OF --------- - 30.05 Acres / / b 2075. � i o RIGOR CR -2446) 30'- �-- 30'(DNR CR -2446) 3� Q / �0 / - - - - - - - - - - - 8 R W PIPE LINE EASEMENT 50- \ ' � - - _ LIL 1315R50'.49' TO C/L PROPOSED NEW ROAD= 1330.33'---- - S 891744" W 1330.40' I / N 89'1804 E 1330.13 ARGENT ROAD 30' (DNR OR / (DNF CR -2446) TVN, R,29E. - 3Q N 89'18'23" E 132979' is PETER GOLDMARK COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE j"ED SEGREGATION SURVEY IN SECTION 16 PASCO 16 FIELD CREW LINK SEILER EDWARDS FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 2016 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS 1A o1' re4sy 5.,� od �'. TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W M. A7 M. IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE yp x.01 ,STATE OF WASHINGTON FIELD BOOK: SEI 1/06/2016 AT THE REQUEST OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES o NATURAL RESOURCES IN JANUARY, 2016 w �£C19TE4�'9. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES . 45158 RYNEA L. EDWARDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER Q rONgt LAN�SJ LAND SURVEY SECTION-P.O. BOX 47030 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7030 (360)902-1206 F.M.,¢ 84-8.2 SHEET I OF 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPUTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: Professional Services Agreement for Conceptual Design of Chapel Hill Boulevard Consultant: TranTech Engineering Address: 12011 NE I" Street, Suite C-305, Bellevue, WA 98005 Scope of Services: Conceptual design of roadway extension to include three -lane and five -lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, bike lanes and landscaping_ Term: Completion Date: Payments to Consultant: 0 Hourly Rate: $ not to exceed $54,444 ❑ Fixed Sum of - El f❑ Other: Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: ❑ $1,000,000 each occurrence; ❑ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or 0 $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: 0 $1,000,000 per claim; ❑ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or ❑ $ per claim; and $ per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Signature by: ❑ Mayor ® City Manager Page 36 of 41 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council May 17, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 5/23/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: PMC Amendment Setting Penalties for Parking Violations I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Council recently adopted amendments to PMC defining "parking across designated lines" and "extended unauthorized parking" as violations. The ordinance making the changes did not specify penalties for such violations which are consistent with Council's wholesale adoption of a new schedule (Class 1, Class 2 and Class 3 violations) for parking and similar violations in 2014 as Ordinance No. 4152. It is important for law enforcement and court processing of violations that penalties be classified in similar and uniform ways. The proposed ordinance addresses this need, classifying both violations as "Class V civil infractions and subject to a $40 penalty. V. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance. Page 37 of 41 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, Amending PMC Chapter 10.16.135 "Penalty Provisions" and Chapter 10.52.035 "Extended Unauthorized Parking Prohibited" to establish penalties for violations thereof. WHEREAS, the City Council has previously determined that certain parking practices should be prohibited and codified in the Pasco Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Council has determined to set penalties for said prohibited practices, consistent with similar offenses; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 10.16.135 entitled "Penalty Provisions" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 10.16.135 PENALTY PROVISIONS. (1) The penalty provisions of Chapter 308-330 WAC, are hereby adopted by reference as if set forth in full; EXCEPTION, any person found to be in violation of any provision of RCW 46.61.570 and RCW 46.61.575, which has been adopted by reference through WAC 308-330-462, WAC 308-330-430, WAC 308-330-436, WAC 308-330-433, WAC 308- 330-439, WAC 308-330-442, WAC 308-330-457, and Chapters 10.44, 10.48, 10.52, 10.56, and 10.94 of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be deemed to have committed a civil infraction and for each such violation shall be subject to a civil penalty in the amount listed below, plus court costs and statutory assessments, if any: (a) Class One. Violation of the following are subject to a maximum penalty of forty dollars ($40.00): (i) WAC 308-330-430. Improper parking in an angled slot. (j)(ii) PMC 10.48.015. Parking across designated lines. (i)iii WAC 308-330-436. Illegal parking for the purpose of displaying, advertising or selling a vehicle. (4) iv PMC 10.56.060. Overtime parking in two hour zone. (i-,�)(v) PMC 10.56.120. Overtime parking in ten minute zone. (v) vi PMC 10.56.130. Overtime parking in one hour zone. vii RCW 46.61.570(a)(i) through RCW 46.61.570(a)(x). Illegal parking in roadway, intersection, crosswalk, bridges, railroad tracks, cross overs, etc. (vii) viii RCW 46.61.570(b)(i) through RCW 46.61.570(b)(vi). Illegal parking in front of driveway, fire hydrant, where signs prohibit stopping, etc. (N, t ix RCW 46.61.570(c)(i) through RCW 46.61.570(c)(ii). Illegal parking within 50' of a railroad crossing or where official signs prohibit parking. Page 38 of 41 (ix -)(x) RCW 46.61.570(3). Pushing vehicle out into roadway. (x-) xi RCW 46.61.575(4). Stopping or standing where signs prohibit same. (*i) xii WAC 308-330-433. Obstructing road way. (xii) xiii WAC 308-330-439. Illegal parking or standing in a passenger zone. (xiii)xiv WAC 308-330-442. Illegal parking and standing in a loading zone. (xis) xv WAC 308-330-457. Illegal parking or standing at bus stops and taxi cab stands. {} xvi PMC 10.52.030(1). Allowing oil or grease to be dropped from vehicle. (moi) xvii PMC 10.52.030(2). Illegal parking of commercial vehicle on residential street. (x -vii) xviii PMC 10.52.030(3). Illegal parking of unlicensed vehicle on roadway. (xix) PMC 10.52.030(4). Illegal parking of boat, motor home, trailer, etc., on road for more than 72 hours. (xviii)(xx) PMC 10.52.035. Extended unauthorized parking_ (x -i) xxi PMC 10.52.045. Illegal parking in student loading zone. (max)xxii PMC 10.52.070. Illegal overnight parking in City lots. (b) Class Two. Violation of the following are subject to a maximum penalty of eighty dollars ($80.00): (i) RCW 46.61.570(4). Illegal blocking of road for attempting to reserve portion for exclusive use. (ii) RCW 46.61.575(1). Illegal stopping/parking on wrong side of road more than twelve (12) inches of curb on a two way road. (iii) RCW 46.61.575(2). Illegal stopping/parking more than twelve (12) inches from curb on one way road. (iv) PMC 10.44.020. Illegal roller skating, skateboarding, coaster on road way. (v) PMC 10.44.060. Illegal riding on portion of vehicle not intended for passengers. (vi) PMC 10.44.070. Illegal train operator blocks road for more than five minutes. (vii) PMC 10.44.080. Illegal cruising. (viii) PMC 10.52.020. Illegal parking in alley. (c) Class Three. Violation of the following are subject to a maximum penalty of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00), together with such other penalties, or greater amounts as authorized by State law; (i) PMC 10.52.080. Handicap parking violations are subject to a monetary penalty of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) and, in addition, to any penalty or fine imposed under this section, two hundred dollars ($200.00) must be assessed pursuant to RCW 46.19.050. The Municipal Court may not suspend more than one-half of any fine imposed under this subsection. Title 10 "Vehicles and Traffic" Page 2 Page 39 of 41 (ii) All other violations contained within this Title not otherwise designated as misdemeanors or gross misdemeanors shall constitute infractions. Unless otherwise designated by class or amount, all violation of infractions shall be presumed to be class three infractions and subject to the maximum penalty of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00), or such additional penalties in such greater amounts as provided by State law. (2) Failure to respond within fifteen (15) days shall result in an additional monetary penalty of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) which shall be due and owing. (3) Each day that a violation continues or each time a violation continues past a parking limitation period or portion thereof in excess of the applicable parking time limitation, it shall be deemed a separate violation subject to the maximum civil penalty as set forth above. (Ord. 4152, 2014; Ord. 3171 Sec. 4, 1996; Ord. 2599, Sec. 1, 1986.) Section 2. That Section 10.52.035 entitled "Extended Unauthorized Parking Prohibited" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 10.52.035 EXTENDED UNAUTHORIZED PARKING PROHIBITED. (1) No person shall park a vehicle on any street or other municipal property for a period of time longer than 14 days, unless an official posted sign provides a shorter period of time, or unless otherwise provided by law. (2) Authorized vehicles on municipal property are excluded from the provisions of this Section, as are vehicles displaying valid proof of payment when parked in spaces controlled by a parking payment device. (3) Penalties: Any vehicle found to be in violation of this Section is declared to be a public nuisance, and shall be subject to a Class PL- I Civil T rPenalty as defined set by PMC 2.88010.16.135. Any vehicle cited under this section two or more times in any 180 day period or that remains in violation of this Section 30 or more days after citation may be impounded if no operator is present who will immediately comply with this Section. (4) Notice to Owner: A law enforcement officer discovering a previously cited and unauthorized vehicle as described in Section 10.52.035 (3) left within a street right-of-way or other municipal property shall attach to the vehicle a readily visible notification. The notification shall contain the following information: a) The date and time the notification was attached; b) The identity of the officer; C) A statement that if the vehicle is not removed within 72 hours from the time the notification is attached, the vehicle may be taken into custody and stored at the owner's expense; d) A statement that if the vehicle is not redeemed as provided in RCW 46.55.120, the vehicle may be declared an abandoned vehicle and sold according to the terms of RCW 46.55.130; e) The address and telephone number where additional information may be obtained. Title 10 "Vehicles and Traffic" Page 3 Page 40 of 41 (5) Relocation of a vehicle for purposes of avoiding impound or citation is prohibited. Vehicles must be relocated a minimum of 20 feet for a minimum duration of 48 hours from the location where the vehicle was noticed or the citation issued. (6) Unauthorized storage of personal effects, in conjunction with use of a vehicle or not, on any public street or municipal property is prohibited. (Ord. 4282, 2016.) Section 3. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage, and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this day of , 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Title 10 "Vehicles and Traffic" Page 4 Page 41 of 41