Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016.04.11 Council Workshop PacketPage 3-5 6-29 30-34 Workshop Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) Code Enforcement Board Interviews April 11, 2016 Council to conduct brief interviews with Israel Delamora, Charles Harding, James Rawlinson and Spencer Sandquist. (b) Pasco School District 2016 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report (c) Vehicular Parking and Storage 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 7. ADJOURNMENT. REMINDERS: 11:45 a.m., Monday, April 11, Pasco Red Lion - Pasco Chamber of Commerce Membership Luncheon. (Army Corp of Engineers Land Conveyance Presentation) 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 12, Senior Center - City of Pasco's Annual Volunteer Banquet. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS and COUNCILMEMBERS BOB HOFFMANN and SAUL MARTINEZ) 7:00 a.m., Thursday, April 14 - BFCG Tri -Mats Policy Advisory Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.) 7:00 p.m., Thursday, April 14 - Ben -Franklin Transit Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.) Page 1 of 34 Workshop Meeting April 11, 2016 11:30 a.m., Friday, April 15 - Benton -Franklin Council of Governments Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.2ov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 2 of 34 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 5, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/11/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Code Enforcement Board Interviews I. REFERENCE(S): Applications (4) (Council Only) Resolution No. 3388 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Council to conduct brief interviews with Israel Delamora, Charles Harding, James Rawlinson and Spencer Sandquist. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The Code Enforcement Board is composed of five members; terms are for two years. The Board meets on the first Thursday of every month at 7:00pm in the City Hall Council Chambers. The Code Enforcement Board hears controversies regarding alleged violations of the City code, particularly property maintenance standards. There are three positions whose terms have expired: 1. Position No. 3 (currently Russell Glatt) 2. Position No. 4 (currently vacant) 3. Position No. 5 (currently Mary Gutierrez) The Council screening committee recommends that, as outlined in Ordinance No. 3388, the incumbents in Position Nos. 3 and 5 be reappointed without interview. At the present time there is one vacant, unexpired term: 1. Position No. 1 (vacant) term expiration date of 1/1/17 Page 3 of 34 After Council Screening Committee review of all applications, the following have been selected to interview for possible appointment to Positions No. 1 and 4: 1. Israel Delamora - 5010 Sinai Drive 2. Charles Harding - 4804 W. Sylvester Street 3. James Rawlinson - 7821 Salmon Drive 4. Spencer Sandquist - 6713 Buttercreek Ct. V. DISCUSSION: After conduct of interviews at the April 11 Workshop meeting, it is proposed that appropriate appointments be made by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the Council, at the April 18 Business meeting. Page 4 of 34 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION Providing a Process for Appointments to City Boards and Commissions. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco maintains several citizen advisory boards to assist the delivery of municipal services as well as to advise the City Council in making various policy decisions; and WHEREAS, the appointment process prescribed by the Pasco Municipal Code requires the Mayor to appoint citizens to vacancies on such boards, subject to confirmation of the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council desire to establish an appointment process which is more collaborative yet efficient for both the applicants and City Council alike; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DOES RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Applications for city boards and commissions shall be solicited annually by the City Manager on behalf of the City Council. Section 2: All applications received by the City Manager shall be reviewed by a City Council committee appointed by the Mayor; such committee, to be known as the "Appointment Screening Committee," shall be ad-hoc, appointed annually, and consist of three members, including the Mayor. The Appointment Screening Committee shall select those applicants it deems best suited for the respective board/commission but not more than three applicants for each vacancy to be filled. The Appointment Screening Committee shall consider the following factors in making their selections for further consideration: a) Geographic representation; b) Gender representation; c) Ethnic representation; d) Familial and financial relationships of board members Section 3: Those applicants selected by the Appointment Screening Committee shall be interviewed by the City Council during a public meeting; provided, however, the Screening Committee may recommend reappointment of an incumbent applicant without interview by the City Council if the incumbent has served not more than two consecutive terms since the last interview. At a City Council meeting following such interview, an interviewed candidate shall be selected by the Mayor for appointment to each vacancy. Any candidate selected by the Mayor shall be subject to confirmation vote of the City Council; a majority vote of the quorum present at such meeting shall be required to confirm the Mayor's appointments. Section 4: Any prior resolutions of the City Council in conflict with the provisions of this resolution shall be superseded by this resolution. PAS D by the City Council qty of Pasco at its regular meeting this 16`h day of April, 2012. Matt Watkins, Mayor u.� Debra Clark, City Clerk APP V AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney n___ r_ _r nn AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 4, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/11/16 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: PSD 2016 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report I. REFERENCE(S): Introduction letter from the PSD Board PSD 2016 Update to the 2011 - 2017 Capital Facilities Plan II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In January of 2011 the Pasco School District (PSD) informed City Council that there was no longer the capacity to accommodate increased student enrollment due do residential growth in the community. The District requested both the City and County consider including the District's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) within their respective Comprehensive Plans and adopt a school impact fee. Council incorporated the District's Capital Facilities Plan in the City's Comprehensive Plan in February of 2012 and in March of 2012 adopted Ordinance 4046 (establishing school impact fees). An Interlocal Agreement for implementation and processing of those fees was also approved by both the District and the City. The current impact fees established by Council through Ordinance 4046 are $4,700 (of this amount $17 is retained by the City for offsetting administrative costs) per single family unit and $4,525 per multi -family unit. One of the stipulations of the Interlocal Agreement is that the District provide a report to the City on the impact fees including the source and amount of all monies received and the public improvements that were financed in whole or in part by the fees. Page 6 of 34 The terms of the Interlocal Agreement also require the City to review and consider biennial updates of the District's CFP and if appropriate, incorporate the updated CFP into our own capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. The first update under the Interlocal Agreement occurred in 2014. V. DISCUSSION: The District's updated CFP contains a revised inventory of capital facilities, recognizing the expansion of capacity as a result of the 2013 bond election, subsequent new elementary school construction and reconfiguration of the classes attending middle schools. The updated CFP also includes revised enrollment figures that use the conservative 6 year forecast prepared by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) in 2015. Forecast enrollment figures for the next 6 years show the following: K-6 enrollment to increase by 200 students - however, the State is expected to reduce class size standards that will require added capacity to house an additional total of 2,381 students in the forecast period. Existing facilities for grades K-6 include 129 portable classrooms - of which 65 provide permanent capacity. Grades 7-8 enrollment is currently at acceptable levels for class size standards - however, expected reduced class size standards will require capacity to house an additional 126 students. Existing facilities for grades 7-8 include 64 portable classrooms - of which 20 provide permanent capacity. Grades 9-12 enrollment is currently over capacity by 1000+ students. With continued growth forecast - the District will need to add capacity for 1,610 students at the high school level. Existing facilities for grades 9-12 include 25 portable classrooms at Pasco High which are considered permanent capacity and one alternative high school - New Horizons - which is housed in 11 portable classrooms. The 2016 District CFP Update contains revised new facility costs per dwelling unit based on the forecast student growth, the facilities that are needed to serve that growth and the estimated costs for those facilities. The newly calculated impact fee amounts (based on the accepted state-wide formula used in Ordinance 4046 adopted in 2012) for single family dwellings is $5,706 and for multi -family dwellings is $6,484. The District is not requesting an increase or change in the amount of the established school impact fees of $4,700 per single family unit and $4,525 per multi -family unit at this time. It should be noted that the existing CFP is for the 2011 - 2017 timeframe. It's expected that the District will prepare a new CFP in 2017 for Council consideration of incorporation into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Page 7 of 34 The District will be available at the Workshop meeting to provide a summary presentation and answer Council questions. If Council is in concurrence with incorporating the District's CFP update and leaving school impact fees at existing levels, a resolution will be prepared for formal consideration. Page 8 of 34 March 28, 2016 Pasco School District #1 G. L. Booth Education Service Center 1215 W. Lewis Street • Pasco, Washington 99301 #1 Board of Directors • (509) 546-2801 • FAX (509) 543-6789 Mayor and Members of the Pasco City Council 525 North 3rd Ave Pasco, WA 99301 Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: On behalf of the Pasco School District Board of Directors, I am writing to thank you for your ongoing support of Pasco Public Schools, through among other things, the adoption and implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance (Ordinance 4046). As required by the Ordinance, the Pasco School Board of Directors approved the updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) on March 22, 2016. We are submitting the enclosed 2016 Update of the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan with a request that you continue to collect school impact fees in the amount that was adopted in 2012. Going forward, enrollment in the District is expected to continue to increase, with the majority of the growth occurring in grades K-6. As reflected in the enclosed CFP Update, the District will serve the forecast growth by completing remaining 2013 bond projects, constructing new schools, adding high school capacity, and through the addition of portable classrooms. The estimated cost for these improvements is over $200,000,000. The District will pay for the improvements with bond proceeds, state construction fund dollars and impact fees, as reflected in the finance plan in the CFP Update. We understand that the imposition of school impact fees may be unpopular with some of the people or organizations we are all elected to represent. At the same time, continued collection of school impact fees is required in order to provide schools for students that live in new housing. The entire community benefits when we have quality schools and we need impact fees to help provide those schools. We appreciate the work we have been able to do with the City through adoption and implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance. We have renewed our request to have a similar ordinance adopted in Franklin County and until such time as the County adopts a school impact fee ordinance, we will continue to request that every new residential development in the County mitigate impacts on schools. If you have any questions regarding the District's 2016 CFP Update, or our request and need for school impact fees, please contact Superintendent Hill at 509.546.2800. Equal Opportunity Employer Page 9 of 34 Sincerely, Scott Lehrman, President Board of Directors Pasco School District No. 1 c: Saundra L. Hill, Superintendent Keith Johnson, County Administrator Dave Zabel], City Manager Celebrating acadejnics, diversiti, and innovation. Page 10 of 34 PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 2016 UPDATE TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Pmc67 SCHOOL DISTRICT #1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Scott Lehrman, President Steve Christensen, Vice President Sherry Lancon, Member Amy Phillips, Member Aaron Richardson, Member SUPERINTENDENT Saundra L. Hill ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF OPERATIONS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS Sarah Thornton Adopted by the Pasco School Board March 22, 2016 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 1 of 19 March 2016 Page 11 of 34 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the 2016 Update to the Capital Facilities Plan The City of Pasco adopted the Pasco School District 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) on April 16, 2012. The CFP was adopted in accordance with the requirements in Ordinance 4046, the School Impact Fee Ordinance. Section 3.133.025 of the School Impact Fee Ordinance describes the elements that must be addressed in the CFP. They include "the District's standard of service, an inventory of facilities, capacity by grade span, a six year enrollment forecast, facility needs and costs, a finance plan and calculation of the school impact fees." Once the CFP with these elements is adopted, the Ordinance says "[t]he District shall file an update to its capital facility plan at least once every two years." And, "[alt lease once every two years, commencing on April 15, 2014, the City Council shall review and consider the District submitted capital facilities plan update." This 2016 Update is being submitted to comply with the above requirements in the School Impact Fee Ordinance. The Update identifies changes that have occurred in the District since 2011-2017 CFP was adopted. The Update supplements the core information in the already adopted 2011-2017 CFP. The District is not requesting changes to the impact fees. B. Changes in the Pasco School District The District now serves over 17,300 students, an increase of 1,400 students since 2012. Updates to the most significant issues facing the District in terms of providing classroom capacity to accommodate existing and projected demands are: • Steady residential development within the district's boundaries continues. The latest demographics study (Pasco School Enrollment Forecast, Hovee, Eric and Dennis, Paul, February 2014) predicts that housing starts may return to pre -recession levels. Since 2012, the City of Pasco has approved the construction of 981 single family units and 502 multi -family units. To construct all the improvements that are required to serve forecast growth, the District will have to ask the voters to approve additional bond measures. Approval of a bond requires a super majority (60% yes votes). The most recent bond to address immediate needs passed with a 62% yes vote in February 2013. Several strategies were used to significantly reduce the cost after the previous bond failed with a 48% yes vote in April 2011. • After the April 2011 failure of the bond election, the Pasco School Board adopted multiple strategies to reduce the cost of school construction for taxpayers: o Reconfigure grade level groupings to delay the construction of a more expensive per pupil middle school while increasing the need for additional elementary schools; o Use property already owned by the district for school sites; Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 2 of 19 March 2016 Page 12 of 34 o Use the Pasco design that has been built 8 times for Pasco schools, thereby saving A/E, construction and maintenance costs; o Two schools to share one playground, reducing the amount of land to be purchased (Curie and Whittier); o Build larger elementary schools to reduce the total number needed and create efficiencies in operations; o Build schools to serve at least 50 years; and o Maintain school buildings well to ensure they last several decades. • In order to reduce costs to Pasco taxpayers in the 2013 bond election, the Board asked voters to approve the construction of three large elementary schools instead of four, knowing that the three schools would lessen the overcrowding somewhat but not eliminate it. • With the addition of capacity at the elementary level, grade level reconfiguration was implemented in the 2015-2016 school year. Middle school enrollment in grades 7-8 is now at an acceptable level for class size standards, allowing some room for enrollment growth at the middle level. Under the Supreme Court's McCleary decision, the Legislature is under court order to fully fund basic K-12 education as defined by the Legislature and the Legislature's Quality Education Council (QEC), which includes K-12 class size reduction. The Legislature has enacted the K-3 class size reductions to be phased in by 2017-2018. The K-3 target student -to -teacher ratio will be 17-1 (15-1 for high poverty schools), consistent with QEC recommendations. This is a significant change from district contractual class sizes which will be 24-1 K-1 and 27-1 2-3 in 2016. These reductions in class size will offset the new gains in capacity achieved through construction of new elementary buildings. The District anticipates the state will continue to adopt the QEC recommendations for K-12. This plan will be updated if warranted by legislative action. • The District has implemented All -Day Kindergarten (ADK) in every Pasco elementary school beginning this school year (2015-2016). The District added portable classrooms to meet this requirement. The District will continue to use cost -reduction strategies Cost reduction strategies and District construction standards save taxpayer dollars. Chart 2 in the Appendix compares the square foot cost to build Pasco schools compared to other schools built in the state during the same time frame to serve the same grade level spans. Pasco construction costs are significantly lower than other school construction costs. In every case, Pasco's construction costs were not only lower but significantly so. In Chart 3 in the Appendix, State scoring matrices show that Pasco School District is effectively maintaining its schools as a community investment and asset, according to a third party review. The schools' adjusted maintenance score is significantly above its expected score for the facility's age, demonstrating effective maintenance by the district. These data mean that they will last longer and be able to serve more students before needing to be replaced. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 3 of 19 March 2016 Page 13 of 34 SECTION 2 DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARDS The District's core and special program needs, which are used to define the standard of service, are addressed in the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan. Elementary school class size targets are to be implemented by 2017, and the District anticipates the Legislature will continue to adopt the QEC recommended class sizes in the future. Below are changes the District anticipates it will have to make to the program standards (or standard of service). B. Elementary Educational Program Standards By 2017-2018 the state will provide funding for a student -to -teacher ratio of 17-1 in grades K-3 (15-1 for high poverty schools), consistent with QEC recommendations and McCleary. The class size of 15 will impact nine elementary schools which qualify as high poverty. The remaining six elementary schools will be impacted by the class size of 17. In addition, the District has expanded all -day kindergarten to all Pasco schools in 2015 under State law, adding Angelou, Markham, Livingston, McGee, Franklin and McClintock. This has required a minimum of 10 additional classrooms based on 2013 kindergarten enrollment. Elementary Class Size Recommendations by the Legislature's Quality Education Council Grades K-3 Enacted by the Legislature Grade Levels Class Size Targeted by the QEC District High -Poverty Schools Non -High Poverty Schools 2016 K-1 15 17 24 2-3 15 17 27 4-6 25 28 4 22 5-6 23 Gray Markham Whittier McGee Robinson Livingston Longfellow Angelou Chess Franklin Emerson McClintock Frost Twain Curie Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 4 of 19 March 2016 Page 14 of 34 C. Middle and High School Program Standards Secondary (Middle and High) school class size standards also are projected to be reduced to levels set by the State's Quality Education Council with recommendations to be mandated under McCleary as noted below. Secondary Class Size Recommendations by the Legislature's Quality Education Council Grade Levels Class Size Targeted by the QEC District High -Poverty Schools Non -High Poverty Schools 2016 7-8 23 25 *30 9-12 23 25 *30 *Max Stevens MS McLoughlin MS 155/day Ochoa MS Pasco HS Chiawana HS New Horizons Hs SECTION 3 CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY As described in the 2011-2017 CFP, the district facilities inventory serves to establish a baseline for determining the facilities necessary to accommodate future demand (student enrollment) at acceptable levels of service. Three schools have been added since the 2014 update to the CFP, resulting in an increase to the permanent capacity calculation. The District also has added and will continue to add portables at all the schools as temporary housing. A. Elementary Schools As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP and 2014 update, there are now a total of fifteen (15) elementary schools. Thirteen (13) serve grades K-6, one (1) serves grades K-2, and one (1) serves grades 3-6. The fifteen (15) elementary schools provide capacity to serve 7,735 students in permanent capacity. As of October 1, 2015, there were 9,940 elementary students enrolled. There are 129 portable classrooms at the elementary schools. Since 2014, the District has added 33 new portable classrooms as temporary capacity. This includes the modification of septic and water service at Markham elementary to allow expansion through the addition of portables which was completed in 2015. Of the 129 portable classrooms, 65 provide permanent capacity for 1,365 elementary students. The state does not count portable classrooms when calculating a district's classroom inventory for purposes of eligibility for state assistance for construction. However, the District has counted some portables into the permanent capacity calculation after consultation with the City of Pasco Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 5 of 19 March 2016 Page 15 of 34 and the recognition that it would likely be cost prohibitive to change all the portable capacity into brick and mortar capacity. B. Middle Schools As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP, there are three middle schools. The schools now serve grades 7-8. The middle schools provide capacity to serve approximately 2,814 students. As of October 1, 2015 there were 2,540 students enrolled. There are 64 portable classrooms at the middle schools. Since 2011, the District added sixteen (16) new portable classrooms, which provide temporary capacity. Of the 64 portable classrooms, 20 provide permanent capacity for approximately 460 students. In 2011, the Multi Track Year Round Task Force recommended that sixth grade become a part of the elementary schools, thereby delaying the need for middle school space and increasing the need for elementary schools which saves the taxpayers the higher cost of building a new middle school. The board approved the configuration change on October 11, 2011. This change has been implemented in the current (2015-16) school year. C. High Schools As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP, there are two traditional high schools serving grades 9-12. There is capacity to serve 3,931 students in the high schools. As of October 1, 2015 there were 4,904 students enrolled. One high school, Pasco High, also has 25 portable classrooms, which provide permanent capacity for approximately 500 students. There is one alternative high school that serves grades 9-12. The alternative school is currently located in 11 portable classrooms and serves over 200 students. No portables were added at the high schools since 2011. D. Support Facilities Bus parking has been expanded into the District's maintenance lay -down yard at the Port of Pasco property (Building 210). The district will be leasing additional space from the Port to replace the lost lay -down yard capacity. D. Land Inventory The District currently owns nine unimproved parcels. Seven are identified in the 2011-2017 CFP. Since 2014 the District acquired a 39 -acre parcel located east of Road 100, and approximately nine and a half (9.5) acres at North Utah Avenue and East Salt Lake Street. The district intends to sell a .33 acre parcel that was gifted to the district and is not suitable for school purposes. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 6 of 19 March 2016 Page 16 of 34 SECTION 4 STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS AND CAPACITY BY GRADE SPAN A. Projected Student Enrollment Since 2014 the District received and reviewed four enrollment forecasts. All four forecasts predict increased enrollment. For purposes of the 2016 CFP Update, the District is relying on the conservative 2015 enrollment forecast, which is prepared and published by OSPI. OSPI forecasts are for six years, starting with actual enrollment in October. In October 2011 there were 15,633 students enrolled in grades K-12. In October 2015 there were 17,353 students enrolled, which is an increase of 1,720 students. By 2021, the forecast predicts there will be 18,597 students enrolled in grades K-12, which is an additional 1,244 students over 2015. The District will need to add permanent and temporary capacity at the elementary and secondary levels to serve the growth. Student enrollment projections can be found in the Appendix, Chart 3. B. Capacity by Grade Span Enrollment in grades K-6 is forecast to grow by over 200 students. At the same time, class size standards are expected to be reduced by the state. Based on the forecast enrollment increase and the anticipated class size reduction, the district will need to add capacity for 2,381 students. In grades 7-8, middle school enrollment in grades 7-8 is now at an acceptable level for class size standards, allowing some room for enrollment growth at the middle level. However, class size standards are also expected to be reduced. In that case, the district will need to add capacity for 126 students. Enrollment in grades 9-12 is currently 4,904 with permanent capacity for 3,931. High school enrollment is over capacity and the forecast is for continued growth. The district is proceeding with plans to relocate New Horizons High School which will add capacity for approximately 200 more students. The district will need to add capacity for 1,610 students at the high school level. The current capacity in the existing schools and the capacity that is needed to serve forecast growth through 2021 was revised based on class size reduction targets and construction projects completed through December 31, 2015. Please see Chart 6 in the Appendix. SECTION 5 CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS To help districts meet the K-3 class size reduction enumerated in RCW 28A.150.260 and RCW 28A.150,315, 2015 the Legislature approved capital funds for a grant through the School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) to assist districts in building facilities to achieve the K- 3 class size reduction targets. OSPI determined the district is in need of 39 classrooms to achieve K-3 class size reduction. Districts may not use the funds to add portable classrooms. The district applied for the funds and is awaiting news of an award. There are insufficient funds allocated by the state to fund every district which submitted for the grant. Regardless, if the Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 7 of 19 March 2016 Page 17 of 34 funds are sufficient and the funded project would be reasonably feasible, the district intends to accept state funding. However, any additional capacity added through the grant would not significantly address the need for added capacity due to enrollment growth. To serve growth and address class size reduction, the District plans on constructing and expanding additional elementary schools. The District will also relocate New Horizons High School and expand Chiawana High School to serve 800 additional 9-12 grade students. Portable classrooms will be used to serve additional growth and to provide temporary facilities while funding is secured to construct brick and mortar facilities. The new schools and portable classrooms will provide the needed capacity identified above. In addition to building schools that add capacity for growth, the District will make other improvements to serve students. The improvements will be constructed in phases and cannot occur until bonds are approved by the voters. The Pasco Facilities Task Force was reconvened in 2014-2015 and identified recommended priorities for the District. Future phases for improvements incorporate the task force recommendations in the PFTF report which was accepted by the Board of Directors on November 10, 2015. The improvements, along with the added capacity and cost estimates, are set out in Chart 7 in the Appendix. SECTION 6 CAPITAL FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN The District's ability to fund the planned improvements that will add capacity is dependent upon the passage of bond elections at a 60% supermajority and receipt of State Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds, also known as "state match" funds. Costs for improvements that add capacity are used to calculate school impact fees. School impact fees, or SEPA mitigation fees, will be used to pay for improvements that add capacity; however, they only cover a portion of the costs for the needed improvements. The majority of the costs to construct the improvements will be paid for with bonds and capital construction funds from the state once bonds are approved in a special election. In addition to construction of facilities to add capacity, the district also needs to acquire school sites for future construction, and must make a variety of improvements that are needed at existing facilities. A key PFTF priority was to address capital facilities needs related to safety and health. The PFTF also recommended constructing a new middle school to serve central Pasco (replacing Stevens Middle School) which would add capacity but also address significant capital maintenance needs. Forecast funding sources for improvements are listed in Chart 8. SECTION 7 SCHOOL IMPACT OR MITIGATION FEES The District's ability to fund the improvements that are needed to serve forecast growth depends on new development contributing to the cost to build the schools that will serve the students that live in new housing. The District is collecting school impact fees from development in the City and will continue to request mitigation fees from developers in Franklin County. The District files annual reports with the City regarding the use of the school impact fees. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 8 of 19 March 2016 Page 18 of 34 The District has calculated school impact fees using the commonly accepted statewide formula, which is in the City's impact fee ordinance. The fees are calculated based on forecast growth, facilities that are needed to serve the growth, and the estimated costs for those facilities. The calculated impact fee amounts, in Appendix B, are $5,706 for each single family residence and $6,484 for each multi -family residence. However, the District is requesting the City continue collecting the current amounts which are: Single Family: $4,700 Multi Family: $4,525 The district began receiving impact fees from the City in 2012. To date, the district has received $5,209,713. Of that amount, $1,250,000 was used to reduce the principal of the 2013 bond and $2,208,772 was used to pay for a portion of the 2015-2016 portable classrooms. The district is planning to use an additional $1,636,000 for portable classrooms in 2016, 2017, bringing the balance to $114,941. The district will plan to use future impact fees as allowed by law, either for continued portable classroom purchases, or towards the cost of construction of permanent capacity to house students. CONCLUSION The District continues to use a variety of strategies to plan, reduce costs, and mitigate the effects of student enrollment growth. Receipt of impact fees remains critical to ensuring the District is able to manage growth by providing sufficient student facilities. The forecast of steady enrollment growth over the next six years underscores the need to use a variety of financing measures, including the passage of bonds, expenditure from the General Fund, and impact fees to meet the needs of the community. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 9 of 19 March 2016 Page 19 of 34 2015-2016 Supporting Data Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 10 of 19 March 2016 Page 20 of 34 Chart 1 Permanent Capacity October 1, 2015 Elementary Schools Grades Served High Poverty? Teaching Stations* Brick & Mortar Capacity" Permanent Portables Total Permanent Capacity' Oct. 1, 2015 Enroll. Gra K-6 Y 21 399 5 494 552 Markham K-6 N 11 231 3 294 371 McGee K-6 N 17 357 7 504 613 Twain K-6 Y 20 380 8 532 778 An elou K-6 N 26 546 8 714 935 Livingston K-6 N 17 357 7 504 795 Whittier K-2 Y 20 380 6 504 586 Robinson K-6 Y 26 494 8 646 802 Emerson K-6 Y 21 399 3 456 643 Longfellow K-6 Y 19 361 3 418 439 Frost K-6 Y 20 380 5 475 648 Chess K-6 Y 21 399 2 437 559 Franklin STEM K-6 N 29 609 0 609 745 McClintock STEM K-6 N 28 588 0 588 649 Curie STEM 3-6 Y 30 570 0 570 793 TOTALS 6,450 65 7,735 9,908 Middle Schools Grades Served High Poverty? Teaching Stations* Brick & Mortar Capacit ** Permanent Portables Total Permanent Capacit *** Oct. 1, 2015 Enroll. McLoughlin 7-8 N 40 988 10 1,238 1,183 Stevens 7-8 Y 27 612 5 727 654 Ochoa 7-8 Y 32 734 5 849 700 TOTAL 98 2,334 20 2,814 2,537 High Schools Grades Served High Poverty? Teaching Stations* Brick & Mortar Capacity" Permanent Portables Total Permanent Capacity' Oct. 1, 2015 Enroll. Pasco High School 9-12 Y 58 1328 25 1903 2,079 Chiawana HS 9-12 Y 88 2028 0 2028 2,557 New Horizons 9-12 Y 0 0 0 0 271 TOTAL 146 3,356 25 3,931 4,907 *Teaching stations are brick & mortar teaching stations from state report less rooms necessary for specialized instruction such as Art, Music, Special Education, Technology, etc. **Brick and Mortar Capacity is number of teaching stations multiplied by the average QEC class size recommendations for grades K-6. For non -high poverty K-6 schools, the average is 21. For high poverty K-6 schools, the average is 19. ***Total Permanent capacity adds the teaching stations in the permanent portables multiplied by the average QEC class size recommendations for grades K-6 as listed above. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 11 of 19 March 2016 Page 21 of 34 Chart 2 Comparison Construction Costs Pasco Schools vs. Other WA Schools Pasco Schools Other WA Schools Average New 2014-2015 STEM $284.04 Washington State $319.35 Elementary Elementary Average Schools* 2007-09 CHS $211.56/sf Other high schools $247.18/sf and $401.45/sf Robinson State average for 2005 Elementary $140.11/sf similar sized schools $276/sf in eastern WA Angelou State average for 2004 Elementary $127.84/sf similar sized schools $206.80/sf in eastern WA 2002 Ochoa Middle $118.81/sf Middle School $167.41/sf School Source: OSPI March 3, 2016 http://www. k12. wa. us/SchFacilities/Programs/SchoolConstructionProjects. aspx *Average per square foot cost for new construction of Franklin, McClintock, and Curie STEM Elementary Schools. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 12 of 19 March 2016 Page 22 of 34 Chart 3 Pasco School District Asset Preservation Program 2016 Building Condition Scores "B.C.E." is the Building Condition Evaluation score given by OSPI for those facilities in which State School Construction Assistance Program (state match) dollars were used. The Current Draft Score" is OSPI's expected score for the age of the facility, given average use and maintenance. Pasco High School is no longer assigned a B.C.E. score for purposes of state reporting because of the age of the facility. However, the district continues to monitor and score Pasco High School for internal monitoring purposes. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 13 of 19 March 2016 Page 23 of 34 OSPI 2014 2015 2016 Current Age in Draft Score Adjusted Adjusted Adjusted Building Years by Age B.C.E. B.C.E. B.C.E. Emerson Elementary 19 79 86.94 87.94 87.94 Frost Elementary 19 79 86.44 86.44 86.44 Pasco High School 63 62 70.33 73.12 NA Chiawana High School 7 94 98.05 95.40 95.3 Franklin STEM Elementary 1 100 NA NA 100 "B.C.E." is the Building Condition Evaluation score given by OSPI for those facilities in which State School Construction Assistance Program (state match) dollars were used. The Current Draft Score" is OSPI's expected score for the age of the facility, given average use and maintenance. Pasco High School is no longer assigned a B.C.E. score for purposes of state reporting because of the age of the facility. However, the district continues to monitor and score Pasco High School for internal monitoring purposes. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 13 of 19 March 2016 Page 23 of 34 Chart 5 OSPI Actual and Projected Enrollments 2015-2021 October 1, 2015 Actual --- PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS --- Grade 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 K-6 Sub -Total Grade 7 Grade 8 6-8 Sub -Total Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 12 9-12 Sub -Total DISTRICT K-12 TOTAL 1,354 1,424 1,427 1,431 1,435 1,439 1,442 1,457 1,381 1,452 1,456 1,460 1,464 1,468 1,513 1,459 1,383 1,454 1,458 1,462 1,466 1,489 1,508 1,454 1,379 1,449 1,453 1,457 1,433 1,491 1,510 1,456 1,381 1,451 1,455 1,383 1,443 1,501 1,520 1,466 1,391 1,461 1,280 1,359 1,418 1,475 1,494 1,441 1,367 9,909 10,065 10,145 10,171 10,143 10,101 10,116 1,323 1,283 1,363 1,422 1,479 1,498 1,445 1,217 1,320 1,280 1,360 1,419 1,476 1,495 2,540 2,603 2,643 2,782 2,898 2,974 2,940 1,289 1,416 1,536 1,490 1,583 1,651 1,718 1,200 1,066 1,171 1,271 1,233 1,310 1,366 1,131 1,126 1,000 1,099 1,192 1,157 1,229 1,284 1,200 1,195 1,061 1,166 1,265 1,228 4,904 4,808 4,902 4,921 5,174 5,383 5,541 17,353 17,476 17,690 17,874 18,215 18,458 18,597 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 14 of 19 March 2016 Page 24 of 34 Chart 6 2021 Needed Student Capacity Permanent Capacity 2016 Forecast Enrollment 2021 Needed Capacity 2021 Elementary (K-6) 7,735 10,116 2,381 Middle (7-8) 2,814 2,940 126 High (9-12) 3,931 5,541 1,610 "Permanent Capacity" is the 2016 brick and mortar teaching stations from the state report, less the number of rooms necessary for specialized instruction such as Art, Music, Special Education, Technology, etc. Permanent capacity is calculated based upon the QEC recommended K-12 class sizes for high poverty and non -high poverty schools. "Forecast Enrollment 2021" is based on the OSPI 2016 six-year enrollment forecast. This forecast is updated annually. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 15 of 19 March 2016 Page 25 of 34 Chart 7 Necessary Facility Improvements, Added Capacity and Costs 2016 Update Necessary Facility Estimated Estimated Improvements Additional Capacity Total Cost REMAINING 2013 BOND PROJECT ESTIMATES New Horizons High School 200 $4,100,000 Relocation Pasco High School Science 100 $5,400,000 Classrooms and Improvements Other School Site $3,930,000 Improvements Total Remaining 2013 300 $13,430,000 Bond Projects ESTIMATED PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS & CAPACITY CONDITIONED ON FUTURE BOND AND STATE ASSISTANCE Phase 1 New Elementary School #16 600 $28,500,000 New Elementary School #17 600 $29,700,000 Stevens MS Replacement and 375 $69,000,000 Expansion CHS Expansion 400 $11,100,000 Curie ES Expansion 80 $1,800,000 Land Acquisition (160 acres) $6,400,000 Support Services Expansion $2,810,000 and Capital Improvements Capital Improvements for $6,259,000 Safetyand Health Total Permanent Capacity 2,055 $155,569,000 ESTIMATED PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS & CAPACITY CONDITIONED ON FUTURE BOND AND STATE ASSISTANCE Phase 2 New Elementary School #18 600 $30,900,000 New Elementary School #19 600 $32,200,000 Total Permanent Capacity 1,200 $63,100,000 TEMPORARY CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS 18 Portable ES Classrooms 378 $2,900,000 18 Portable HS Classrooms 414 $2,900,000 Total 792 $5,800,000 TOTALS 4,347 $237,899,000 Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 16 of 19 March 2016 Page 26 of 34 Chart 8 Capital Facilities Financing Plan Project Estimates Project Estimates Project Added Capacity Est. Cost Source of Funding Bonds State Match Impact/ Mitigation Fees General Fund New Horizons HS Relocation 200 $4,100,000 $4,100,000 0 0 0 Pasco High School Science Rooms & Imp. 100 $5,400,000 $2,700,000 $2,700,000 0 0 Other Site Improvements NA $3,930,000 $3,930,000 Elementary #16 600 $28,500,000 $14,300,000 $13,800,000 $ 400,000 0 Elementary #17 600 $29,700,000 $15,800,000 $13,700,000 $ 200,000 0 Stevens MS Replace and Expand 375 $69,000,000 $32,000,000 $37,000,000 0 0 Chiawana HS Expansion 400 $11,100,000 $6,000,000 $5,100,000 0 0 Curie ES Expansion 80 $1,800,000 1,800,000 0 0 0 Land Acquisition NA $ 6,400,000 $6,400,000 0 0 0 Support Services Expansion NA $2,810,000 $1,405,000 0 0 $1,405,000 Capital Improvements for Safety & Health NA $6,259,000 $5,000,000 0 0 $1,259,000 Portable Classrooms 700 $5,800,000 0 0 $4,500,000 $1,300,000 Elementar #18 600 $30,900,000 $17,000,000 $13,900,000 1 0 1 0 Elementary #19 600 $32,200,000 $18,300,000 $13,900,000 1 0 10 This number is an estimate of state match and is subject to verification by OSPI. ** This number is an estimate that assumes housing development will occur at a rate estimated by growth projections. *** This amount is less than the other similar elementary school because the district already owned the land and had already completed much of the architectural and engineering work in preparation for shovel ready construction when the bond passed. Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 17 of 19 March 2016 Page 27 of 34 APPENDIX B IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 18 of 19 March 2016 Page 28 of 34 PASCO SC"OOL DISTRICT 2016 impact Fee SIF -r 9.SF)-(,SWJ-Ir'+r.x_1f'x1L22)]x-1-F'C Single Family Residence= Ownerrtaryt Middle School 115P Schaal $21256D,DCICAD SD.CO 52D,E+06,000.6] 6713 1 713] 347,636.C71) $D.00 529.428.E 0.31 D 6.056 6.1 D3 $14,725 -CO $0-00 $2,542. 6 32}6.76 5266.76 5X+3.76 96AD 117.DD 130. DO 61.93% 81.9396 @1.53% KT25.22 $0.1m 3$2o2.18 $9,958-76 $0-6O WCAS Muilti-Farnily Residence= 2rY% reduction APPENDIX B Formula Facltty CM Adiditional Capaelty Cuc&1 per St&rderrt ; ent Factnr,,' =: CSxsF €;uPl 5q Ft S1� Matcn Elgl3ll y % urate Ma" CrEdi:DY CS x SF -!IN Cast perS11re91a FarNyReelaearce• 0.6356 AWerW Int&eStRa1E 6.41579751 Tac Credit Nrrnerdtorr 0.1356509191 Tal CrLKM DenixTlnatcir 8.2315 1 69 87 Tax CiredH Mutpler:TCMIj 3151.3m. D] A a e.racp Assessed Valu a I,A,4V } 1254905.67 TCM x AAV D.130250 Tal[ ".Fey 93Le jT�_ft" 33.131.29 TGM x.SAV xTLR='-C1 $0.60 Coat per SLAiVile Family Reeldence - Tax Credo 3T,9C2.D5 25% rE-ducxan r. $5,7m.1.6 Calculated Single Farnfly Fee Amount $4,7011 Recomm4rwM Foe Amount Elementary Middle School Hifi Schaal $2E. X,DXA0 5D.CD 52DI,E+OD.GM.133 67D 1 i6] S47.530OD 513:60 525,448. 7 0.270 6.CW 6176] 412,525.19 $0.60 $Z3M.25 3206.76 5266.76 51 EJ]. 17 9610 117.66 130. D] 61.93% &1.93% 81.53% $4,115.38 50.0D 31.5.5.1& $5,708-62 $0-1010 $815.11 0.6356 6.418}9751 D.D50569191 8.2915187 3x814-3.69 D.6D240 5-M 1.7+7 S2,1E1.a1 $6,40,11.52 $4,.525 Formula Facility C= A1ir Meal Capadtyf CLs.1 per student 11udent Factor ,._.- CSxSF E0120111L Irdex CkaPI Sq Ft Match Elgl illry %. } Ve Maul CrEd1 ;�_,,pr C3x5F-SM Caetper MulllfandlyReelderrce A'eerap IrrterestRME- Tan[[ Credit Nrrnerdtor Tax Credit Denominat r Tax Coedit WnpleryTCM} A EregeAssessed3da1a[AALV} TCM x AAV Tait LWey Pate M_R} TGM x AAV x TLR = [TC] CL*et per IllWttfarrllly Residence -Tax CreAt 25% rEd action 'A.: Calculated lurltl- FarNBy Fax Amaourit RecomnvxK ed Fee Aamoorrt Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update Page 19 of 19 March 2016 Page 29 of 34 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council April 1, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/11/16 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Vehicular Parking and Storage I. REFERENCE(S): Draft Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Use of the public right-of-way for vehicle storage can become problematic for neighborhoods and commercial areas. Vehicles stored within the right of way for long periods of time can block access for emergency response, limit the access of abutting property owners/residents, impact the ability to conduct maintenance activities and in some cases decrease the value or marketability of a property. In commercial areas parking is typically limited by ordinance or is sufficiently distant from residential areas unattended vehicles over a prolonged period of time are not common. In contrast, residential street parking is largely unregulated and complaints from within residential areas are however on the rise. As an example, in January this year, Council received input from a citizen that was concerned with long term parking of vehicles on public streets. In that situation, the vehicle was licensed, not obviously disabled, was accumulating debris underneath as it had not moved for a long period of time and was owned by a person near to where the vehicle is parked. It appeared obvious the public street was being used for vehicle storage. Complaints with the Police Department and Code Enforcement were lodged. As the vehicle was on a public street, Code Enforcement did not have jurisdiction through the Pasco Municipal Code. As the vehicle was licensed and was not by definition "junk" or "abandoned," the Police Department was not able to cite the vehicle's owner for a Page 30 of 34 traffic or code offense. An inventory of applicable PMC regulations as well as the applicable State law and Administrative Code confirm that this situation does not fall cleanly into a category for enforcement. For example: Title 9 of the PMC (Nuisances) regulates nuisances but basically limits regulating vehicles to those "abandoned, "junk" or determined to be "vehicle hulks." Title 10 of the PMC (Vehicles and Traffic) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings on public streets but not if the vehicle is less than 14,000 lbs. gross weight, is licensed and isn't a recreational vehicle (including RV's, boats, trailers...). Title 12 of the PMC (Streets and Sidewalks) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings including spillage of material on public streets, parking on swales or planting strips or otherwise interfering with normal use of the street - but not the parking (even for long periods) of licensed and maintained vehicles. Title 25 of the PMC (Zoning) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings but limits the regulations to those occurring on private property. Council reviewed the draft Ordinance at the Workshop meetings of February 22 and March 14, 2016. The current version is reflective of Council comments from those two sessions. V. DISCUSSION: The most direct way to address issues of this type is to amend the PMC to provide a restriction on the parking of vehicles on public streets for longer than a set amount of time and/or other locations. It is most likely that enforcement of this issue will be by complaint and the initial notice or "tag" upon an unauthorized vehicle will be placed by a Police Officer or a Code Enforcement Officer. This most recent draft Ordinance contains shortened time periods for compliance but substitutes enforcement by impoundment with enforcement by citation. Impoundment of vehicles is recommended only for chronic offenders (same vehicle cited for storage on the public streets twice within any 180 day period or that remains on the public street 30 days or more after citation). Page 31 of 34 CI : 1 L .Wye -013 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, adding a new Section 10.48.015 "Parking Across Designated Parking Lines" and adding a new Section 10.52.035 "Prohibiting Extended Unauthorized Parking" to the Pasco Municipal Code WHEREAS, Title 10 of the Pasco Municipal Code regulates parking on public streets; and WHEREAS, Title 10 of the Pasco Municipal Code does not contain a provision for regulation of parking on public streets otherwise functioning and licensed vehicles for extended periods of time; and WHEREAS, Parking of vehicles for extended periods of time on public streets or other municipal property causes build - up of debris under vehicles and invites acts of vandalism or other crime; and WHEREAS, Parking of vehicles for extended periods of time and storage of other personal effects on public streets or other municipal property has adverse effects on the ability of the street or property to effectively serve its main purpose of providing a safe and efficient mode of transportation or location for public services; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That a new Section of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is added and shall read as follows: 10.48.015 PARKING ACROSS DESIGNATED LINES PROHIBITED. Parkin across cross designated parking space lines is prohibited on public streets as identified in 10.48.020. 1 17►�11•►�%9i. 12=11 7LoI.r 11 1M."Iffi" 11ol 7.11101 ,41210 ANGLE PARKING PERMITTED NAME OF STREET FROM TO S. 2nd Avenue, west side Lewis Columbia N. 2nd Avenue, west side Clark Bonneville N. 2nd Avenue, west side Yakima Shoshone S. 3rd Avenue, west side Lewis Columbia S. 4th Avenue, west side Columbia South Street S. 4th Lane "A" Street "C" Street N. 4th Avenue Clark Columbia S. 5th Avenue, west side "A" Street "B" Street N. 5th Avenue, east side Jan Bypass S. 6th Avenue Columbia, south 170 ft. N. 6th Avenue Shoshone North to alley S. 7th Lane, west side "A" Street "B" Street S. 7th Avenue ANGLE PARKING PERMITTED (continued) Lewis Columbia Page 32 of 34 N. 8th Avenue Clark Lewis 9th Avenue, east side `B" Street, north 300 ft (head -in) 9th Avenue Clark Lewis 10th Avenue, west side Nixon Sylvester (head -in) N. 11th Avenue Bonneville Shoshone N. 12th Avenue, west side Sylvester, south Irving N. 12th Avenue, west side Sylvester, north Nixon Ainsworth 1 Ith Avenue, east 130 ft. Columbia, south side Tacoma 1 st Avenue Columbia, north side 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue Columbia 5th Avenue 7th Avenue Columbia, north side 7th Avenue, west 560 ft. Clark, south side 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue Bonneville, north side 1 st Avenue 2nd Avenue 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue (except west of 4th Avenue for 150 ft.) Bonneville, south side 14th Avenue, east 230 ft Bonneville, north side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue Bonneville, north side 14th Avenue, east 300 ft Hopkins, south side 14th Avenue, 180 ft. Hopkins, north side 14th Avenue, east 250 ft. Hassalo, north side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue Shoshone, south side 14th Avenue, east 130 ft. Shoshone, south side 15th Avenue 16th Avenue Shoshone, north side 6th Avenue, west 200 ft. Shoshone, north side 10th Avenue, west 315 ft. Yakima, south side 10th Avenue, west 245 ft. Sylvester, north side 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Irving, south side 10th Avenue 15th Avenue Irving, south side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue (head -in) Irving, north side 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Nixon, south side 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Nixon, south side 7th Avenue, east 5th Avenue Nixon 3rd Avenue, east One-half block Margaret, north side 12th Avenue, west 200 ft. Henry, north side 14th Avenue, east One-half block Henry, north side 10th Avenue, west One-half block and east 200 ft. Court, north side 7th Avenue, west 300 ft. Section 2. That a new Section of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is added and shall read as follows: 10.52.035 EXTENDED UNAUTHORIZED PARKING PROHIBITED. (1) No person shall park a vehicle on any street or other municipal property for a period of time longer than 14 days, unless an official posted sign provides a shorter period of time, or unless otherwise provided by law. Page 33 of 34 (2) Authorized vehicles on municipal property are excluded from the provisions of this Section, as are vehicles displayin vg alid proof of payment when parked in spaces controlled by a parking payment device. (3) Penalties: Any vehicle found to be in violation of this Section is declared to be a public nuisance, and shall be subject to a Class IV Civil Infraction as defined by PMC 1.02.080. Any vehicle cited under this section two or more times in any 180 day period or that remains in violation of this Section 30 or more days after citation may be impounded if no operator is present who will immediately comply with this Section. (4) Notice to Owner: a) A law enforcement officer discovering a previously cited and unauthorized vehicle as described in Section 10.52.035 (3) left within a street right-of-way or other municipal property shall attach to the vehicle a readily visible notification. The notification shall contain the following information: b) The date and time the notification was attached; c) The identity of the officer; d) A statement that if the vehicle is not removed within 72 hours from the time the notification is attached, the vehicle may be taken into custody and stored at the owner's expense; e) A statement that if the vehicle is not redeemed as provided in RCW 46.55.120, the vehicle may be declared an abandoned vehicle and sold according to the terms of RCW 46.55.130; f) The address and telephone number where additional information may be obtained. (5) Relocation of a vehicle for purposes of avoiding impound or citation is prohibited. Vehicles must be relocated a minimum of 20 feet for a minimum duration of 48 hours from the location where the vehicle was noticed or the citation issued. (6) Unauthorized storage of personal effects, in conjunction with use of a vehicle or not, on any public street or municipal property is prohibited. Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, at its regular meeting of 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Debra Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 34 of 34