HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016.04.11 Council Workshop PacketPage
3-5
6-29
30-34
Workshop Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER:
2. ROLL CALL:
AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
7:00 p.m.
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:
4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
(a) Code Enforcement Board Interviews
April 11, 2016
Council to conduct brief interviews with Israel Delamora, Charles Harding,
James Rawlinson and Spencer Sandquist.
(b) Pasco School District 2016 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee
Report
(c) Vehicular Parking and Storage
5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
6. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
7. ADJOURNMENT.
REMINDERS:
11:45 a.m., Monday, April 11, Pasco Red Lion - Pasco Chamber of Commerce
Membership Luncheon. (Army Corp of Engineers Land Conveyance Presentation)
6:00 p.m., Tuesday, April 12, Senior Center - City of Pasco's Annual Volunteer
Banquet. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS and COUNCILMEMBERS BOB
HOFFMANN and SAUL MARTINEZ)
7:00 a.m., Thursday, April 14 - BFCG Tri -Mats Policy Advisory Committee
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK,
Alt.)
7:00 p.m., Thursday, April 14 - Ben -Franklin Transit Board Meeting. (MAYOR
MATT WATKINS, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.)
Page 1 of 34
Workshop Meeting
April 11, 2016
11:30 a.m., Friday, April 15 - Benton -Franklin Council of Governments Board
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.)
This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and
streamed at www.pasco-wa.2ov/psctvlive.
Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance.
Page 2 of 34
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council
April 5, 2016
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/11/16
FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager
SUBJECT: Code Enforcement Board Interviews
I. REFERENCE(S):
Applications (4) (Council Only)
Resolution No. 3388
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council to conduct brief interviews with Israel Delamora, Charles Harding, James
Rawlinson and Spencer Sandquist.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The Code Enforcement Board is composed of five members; terms are for two years.
The Board meets on the first Thursday of every month at 7:00pm in the City Hall
Council Chambers.
The Code Enforcement Board hears controversies regarding alleged violations of the
City code, particularly property maintenance standards.
There are three positions whose terms have expired:
1. Position No. 3 (currently Russell Glatt)
2. Position No. 4 (currently vacant)
3. Position No. 5 (currently Mary Gutierrez)
The Council screening committee recommends that, as outlined in Ordinance No.
3388, the incumbents in Position Nos. 3 and 5 be reappointed without interview.
At the present time there is one vacant, unexpired term:
1. Position No. 1 (vacant) term expiration date of 1/1/17
Page 3 of 34
After Council Screening Committee review of all applications, the following have been
selected to interview for possible appointment to Positions No. 1 and 4:
1. Israel Delamora - 5010 Sinai Drive
2. Charles Harding - 4804 W. Sylvester Street
3. James Rawlinson - 7821 Salmon Drive
4. Spencer Sandquist - 6713 Buttercreek Ct.
V. DISCUSSION:
After conduct of interviews at the April 11 Workshop meeting, it is proposed that
appropriate appointments be made by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the
Council, at the April 18 Business meeting.
Page 4 of 34
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION Providing a Process for Appointments to City Boards and
Commissions.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco maintains several citizen advisory boards to assist the delivery of
municipal services as well as to advise the City Council in making various policy decisions; and
WHEREAS, the appointment process prescribed by the Pasco Municipal Code requires the Mayor
to appoint citizens to vacancies on such boards, subject to confirmation of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council desire to establish an appointment process which is more
collaborative yet efficient for both the applicants and City Council alike; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DOES RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1: Applications for city boards and commissions shall be solicited annually by the City
Manager on behalf of the City Council.
Section 2: All applications received by the City Manager shall be reviewed by a City Council
committee appointed by the Mayor; such committee, to be known as the "Appointment Screening
Committee," shall be ad-hoc, appointed annually, and consist of three members, including the Mayor. The
Appointment Screening Committee shall select those applicants it deems best suited for the respective
board/commission but not more than three applicants for each vacancy to be filled. The Appointment
Screening Committee shall consider the following factors in making their selections for further
consideration:
a) Geographic representation;
b) Gender representation;
c) Ethnic representation;
d) Familial and financial relationships of board members
Section 3: Those applicants selected by the Appointment Screening Committee shall be
interviewed by the City Council during a public meeting; provided, however, the Screening Committee may
recommend reappointment of an incumbent applicant without interview by the City Council if the incumbent
has served not more than two consecutive
terms since the last interview. At a City Council meeting following such interview, an interviewed candidate
shall be selected by the Mayor for appointment to each vacancy. Any candidate selected by the Mayor shall
be subject to confirmation vote of the City Council; a majority vote of the quorum present at such meeting
shall be required to confirm the Mayor's appointments.
Section 4: Any prior resolutions of the City Council in conflict with the provisions of this
resolution shall be superseded by this resolution.
PAS D by the City Council qty of Pasco at its regular meeting this 16`h day of April, 2012.
Matt Watkins, Mayor
u.�
Debra Clark, City Clerk
APP V AS TO FORM:
Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
n___ r_ _r nn
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council
April 4, 2016
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/11/16
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: PSD 2016 Capital Facility Plan Update and Impact Fee Report
I. REFERENCE(S):
Introduction letter from the PSD Board
PSD 2016 Update to the 2011 - 2017 Capital Facilities Plan
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
In January of 2011 the Pasco School District (PSD) informed City Council that there
was no longer the capacity to accommodate increased student enrollment due do
residential growth in the community. The District requested both the City and County
consider including the District's Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) within their respective
Comprehensive Plans and adopt a school impact fee.
Council incorporated the District's Capital Facilities Plan in the City's Comprehensive
Plan in February of 2012 and in March of 2012 adopted Ordinance 4046 (establishing
school impact fees). An Interlocal Agreement for implementation and processing of
those fees was also approved by both the District and the City. The current impact fees
established by Council through Ordinance 4046 are $4,700 (of this amount $17 is
retained by the City for offsetting administrative costs) per single family unit and
$4,525 per multi -family unit.
One of the stipulations of the Interlocal Agreement is that the District provide a report
to the City on the impact fees including the source and amount of all monies received
and the public improvements that were financed in whole or in part by the fees.
Page 6 of 34
The terms of the Interlocal Agreement also require the City to review and consider
biennial updates of the District's CFP and if appropriate, incorporate the updated CFP
into our own capital facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. The first update
under the Interlocal Agreement occurred in 2014.
V. DISCUSSION:
The District's updated CFP contains a revised inventory of capital facilities,
recognizing the expansion of capacity as a result of the 2013 bond election, subsequent
new elementary school construction and reconfiguration of the classes attending
middle schools. The updated CFP also includes revised enrollment figures that use the
conservative 6 year forecast prepared by the Office of Superintendent of Public
Instruction (OSPI) in 2015. Forecast enrollment figures for the next 6 years show the
following:
K-6 enrollment to increase by 200 students - however, the State is expected to
reduce class size standards that will require added capacity to house an
additional total of 2,381 students in the forecast period. Existing facilities for
grades K-6 include 129 portable classrooms - of which 65 provide permanent
capacity.
Grades 7-8 enrollment is currently at acceptable levels for class size standards -
however, expected reduced class size standards will require capacity to house
an additional 126 students. Existing facilities for grades 7-8 include 64 portable
classrooms - of which 20 provide permanent capacity.
Grades 9-12 enrollment is currently over capacity by 1000+ students. With
continued growth forecast - the District will need to add capacity for 1,610
students at the high school level. Existing facilities for grades 9-12 include 25
portable classrooms at Pasco High which are considered permanent capacity
and one alternative high school - New Horizons - which is housed in 11
portable classrooms.
The 2016 District CFP Update contains revised new facility costs per dwelling unit
based on the forecast student growth, the facilities that are needed to serve that growth
and the estimated costs for those facilities. The newly calculated impact fee amounts
(based on the accepted state-wide formula used in Ordinance 4046 adopted in 2012) for
single family dwellings is $5,706 and for multi -family dwellings is $6,484. The District
is not requesting an increase or change in the amount of the established school impact
fees of $4,700 per single family unit and $4,525 per multi -family unit at this time.
It should be noted that the existing CFP is for the 2011 - 2017 timeframe. It's expected
that the District will prepare a new CFP in 2017 for Council consideration of
incorporation into the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Page 7 of 34
The District will be available at the Workshop meeting to provide a summary
presentation and answer Council questions. If Council is in concurrence with
incorporating the District's CFP update and leaving school impact fees at existing
levels, a resolution will be prepared for formal consideration.
Page 8 of 34
March 28, 2016
Pasco School District #1
G. L. Booth Education Service Center
1215 W. Lewis Street • Pasco, Washington 99301
#1 Board of Directors • (509) 546-2801 • FAX (509) 543-6789
Mayor and Members of the Pasco City Council
525 North 3rd Ave
Pasco, WA 99301
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:
On behalf of the Pasco School District Board of Directors, I am writing to thank you for your
ongoing support of Pasco Public Schools, through among other things, the adoption and
implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance (Ordinance 4046). As required by the
Ordinance, the Pasco School Board of Directors approved the updated Capital Facilities Plan
(CFP) on March 22, 2016. We are submitting the enclosed 2016 Update of the 2011-2017
Capital Facilities Plan with a request that you continue to collect school impact fees in the
amount that was adopted in 2012.
Going forward, enrollment in the District is expected to continue to increase, with the majority of
the growth occurring in grades K-6. As reflected in the enclosed CFP Update, the District will
serve the forecast growth by completing remaining 2013 bond projects, constructing new
schools, adding high school capacity, and through the addition of portable classrooms. The
estimated cost for these improvements is over $200,000,000. The District will pay for the
improvements with bond proceeds, state construction fund dollars and impact fees, as reflected
in the finance plan in the CFP Update.
We understand that the imposition of school impact fees may be unpopular with some of the
people or organizations we are all elected to represent. At the same time, continued collection of
school impact fees is required in order to provide schools for students that live in new housing.
The entire community benefits when we have quality schools and we need impact fees to help
provide those schools.
We appreciate the work we have been able to do with the City through adoption and
implementation of the School Impact Fee Ordinance. We have renewed our request to have a
similar ordinance adopted in Franklin County and until such time as the County adopts a school
impact fee ordinance, we will continue to request that every new residential development in the
County mitigate impacts on schools.
If you have any questions regarding the District's 2016 CFP Update, or our request and need for
school impact fees, please contact Superintendent Hill at 509.546.2800.
Equal Opportunity Employer
Page 9 of 34
Sincerely,
Scott Lehrman, President
Board of Directors
Pasco School District No. 1
c: Saundra L. Hill, Superintendent
Keith Johnson, County Administrator
Dave Zabel], City Manager
Celebrating acadejnics, diversiti, and innovation.
Page 10 of 34
PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1
2016 UPDATE TO THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Pmc67
SCHOOL DISTRICT #1
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Scott Lehrman, President
Steve Christensen, Vice President
Sherry Lancon, Member
Amy Phillips, Member
Aaron Richardson, Member
SUPERINTENDENT
Saundra L. Hill
ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT OF OPERATIONS
AND LEGAL AFFAIRS
Sarah Thornton
Adopted by the Pasco School Board
March 22, 2016
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 1 of 19
March 2016
Page 11 of 34
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose of the 2016 Update to the Capital Facilities Plan
The City of Pasco adopted the Pasco School District 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) on
April 16, 2012. The CFP was adopted in accordance with the requirements in Ordinance 4046,
the School Impact Fee Ordinance.
Section 3.133.025 of the School Impact Fee Ordinance describes the elements that must be
addressed in the CFP. They include "the District's standard of service, an inventory of facilities,
capacity by grade span, a six year enrollment forecast, facility needs and costs, a finance plan
and calculation of the school impact fees." Once the CFP with these elements is adopted, the
Ordinance says "[t]he District shall file an update to its capital facility plan at least once every
two years." And, "[alt lease once every two years, commencing on April 15, 2014, the City
Council shall review and consider the District submitted capital facilities plan update."
This 2016 Update is being submitted to comply with the above requirements in the School
Impact Fee Ordinance. The Update identifies changes that have occurred in the District since
2011-2017 CFP was adopted. The Update supplements the core information in the already
adopted 2011-2017 CFP. The District is not requesting changes to the impact fees.
B. Changes in the Pasco School District
The District now serves over 17,300 students, an increase of 1,400 students since 2012.
Updates to the most significant issues facing the District in terms of providing classroom
capacity to accommodate existing and projected demands are:
• Steady residential development within the district's boundaries continues. The latest
demographics study (Pasco School Enrollment Forecast, Hovee, Eric and Dennis,
Paul, February 2014) predicts that housing starts may return to pre -recession
levels. Since 2012, the City of Pasco has approved the construction of 981 single
family units and 502 multi -family units.
To construct all the improvements that are required to serve forecast growth, the
District will have to ask the voters to approve additional bond measures. Approval
of a bond requires a super majority (60% yes votes). The most recent bond to
address immediate needs passed with a 62% yes vote in February 2013. Several
strategies were used to significantly reduce the cost after the previous bond failed
with a 48% yes vote in April 2011.
• After the April 2011 failure of the bond election, the Pasco School Board adopted
multiple strategies to reduce the cost of school construction for taxpayers:
o Reconfigure grade level groupings to delay the construction of a more
expensive per pupil middle school while increasing the need for additional
elementary schools;
o Use property already owned by the district for school sites;
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 2 of 19
March 2016
Page 12 of 34
o Use the Pasco design that has been built 8 times for Pasco schools, thereby
saving A/E, construction and maintenance costs;
o Two schools to share one playground, reducing the amount of land to be
purchased (Curie and Whittier);
o Build larger elementary schools to reduce the total number needed and create
efficiencies in operations;
o Build schools to serve at least 50 years; and
o Maintain school buildings well to ensure they last several decades.
• In order to reduce costs to Pasco taxpayers in the 2013 bond election, the Board
asked voters to approve the construction of three large elementary schools instead
of four, knowing that the three schools would lessen the overcrowding somewhat
but not eliminate it.
• With the addition of capacity at the elementary level, grade level reconfiguration
was implemented in the 2015-2016 school year. Middle school enrollment in grades
7-8 is now at an acceptable level for class size standards, allowing some room for
enrollment growth at the middle level.
Under the Supreme Court's McCleary decision, the Legislature is under court order
to fully fund basic K-12 education as defined by the Legislature and the
Legislature's Quality Education Council (QEC), which includes K-12 class size
reduction. The Legislature has enacted the K-3 class size reductions to be phased
in by 2017-2018. The K-3 target student -to -teacher ratio will be 17-1 (15-1 for high
poverty schools), consistent with QEC recommendations. This is a significant
change from district contractual class sizes which will be 24-1 K-1 and 27-1 2-3 in
2016. These reductions in class size will offset the new gains in capacity achieved
through construction of new elementary buildings. The District anticipates the state
will continue to adopt the QEC recommendations for K-12. This plan will be updated
if warranted by legislative action.
• The District has implemented All -Day Kindergarten (ADK) in every Pasco
elementary school beginning this school year (2015-2016). The District added
portable classrooms to meet this requirement.
The District will continue to use cost -reduction strategies Cost reduction strategies
and District construction standards save taxpayer dollars. Chart 2 in the Appendix
compares the square foot cost to build Pasco schools compared to other schools
built in the state during the same time frame to serve the same grade level spans.
Pasco construction costs are significantly lower than other school construction
costs. In every case, Pasco's construction costs were not only lower but
significantly so.
In Chart 3 in the Appendix, State scoring matrices show that Pasco School District
is effectively maintaining its schools as a community investment and asset,
according to a third party review. The schools' adjusted maintenance score is
significantly above its expected score for the facility's age, demonstrating effective
maintenance by the district. These data mean that they will last longer and be able
to serve more students before needing to be replaced.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 3 of 19
March 2016
Page 13 of 34
SECTION 2
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM STANDARDS
The District's core and special program needs, which are used to define the standard of service,
are addressed in the 2011-2017 Capital Facilities Plan. Elementary school class size targets
are to be implemented by 2017, and the District anticipates the Legislature will continue to adopt
the QEC recommended class sizes in the future. Below are changes the District anticipates it
will have to make to the program standards (or standard of service).
B. Elementary Educational Program Standards
By 2017-2018 the state will provide funding for a student -to -teacher ratio of 17-1 in grades K-3
(15-1 for high poverty schools), consistent with QEC recommendations and McCleary. The
class size of 15 will impact nine elementary schools which qualify as high poverty. The
remaining six elementary schools will be impacted by the class size of 17.
In addition, the District has expanded all -day kindergarten to all Pasco schools in 2015 under
State law, adding Angelou, Markham, Livingston, McGee, Franklin and McClintock. This has
required a minimum of 10 additional classrooms based on 2013 kindergarten enrollment.
Elementary Class Size Recommendations by the
Legislature's Quality Education Council
Grades K-3 Enacted by the Legislature
Grade
Levels
Class Size Targeted by the QEC
District
High -Poverty
Schools Non -High Poverty Schools
2016
K-1 15
17
24
2-3 15
17
27
4-6
25
28
4 22
5-6
23
Gray
Markham
Whittier
McGee
Robinson
Livingston
Longfellow
Angelou
Chess
Franklin
Emerson
McClintock
Frost
Twain
Curie
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 4 of 19
March 2016
Page 14 of 34
C. Middle and High School Program Standards
Secondary (Middle and High) school class size standards also are projected to be reduced to
levels set by the State's Quality Education Council with recommendations to be mandated
under McCleary as noted below.
Secondary Class Size Recommendations by the
Legislature's Quality Education Council
Grade
Levels Class Size Targeted by the QEC District
High -Poverty Schools Non -High Poverty Schools 2016
7-8 23 25 *30
9-12 23 25 *30
*Max
Stevens MS McLoughlin MS 155/day
Ochoa MS
Pasco HS
Chiawana HS
New Horizons Hs
SECTION 3
CAPITAL FACILITIES INVENTORY
As described in the 2011-2017 CFP, the district facilities inventory serves to establish a baseline
for determining the facilities necessary to accommodate future demand (student enrollment) at
acceptable levels of service. Three schools have been added since the 2014 update to the
CFP, resulting in an increase to the permanent capacity calculation. The District also has added
and will continue to add portables at all the schools as temporary housing.
A. Elementary Schools
As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP and 2014 update, there are now a total of fifteen
(15) elementary schools. Thirteen (13) serve grades K-6, one (1) serves grades K-2, and one
(1) serves grades 3-6. The fifteen (15) elementary schools provide capacity to serve 7,735
students in permanent capacity. As of October 1, 2015, there were 9,940 elementary students
enrolled.
There are 129 portable classrooms at the elementary schools. Since 2014, the District has
added 33 new portable classrooms as temporary capacity. This includes the modification of
septic and water service at Markham elementary to allow expansion through the addition of
portables which was completed in 2015. Of the 129 portable classrooms, 65 provide permanent
capacity for 1,365 elementary students.
The state does not count portable classrooms when calculating a district's classroom inventory
for purposes of eligibility for state assistance for construction. However, the District has counted
some portables into the permanent capacity calculation after consultation with the City of Pasco
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 5 of 19
March 2016
Page 15 of 34
and the recognition that it would likely be cost prohibitive to change all the portable capacity into
brick and mortar capacity.
B. Middle Schools
As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP, there are three middle schools. The schools now
serve grades 7-8. The middle schools provide capacity to serve approximately 2,814 students.
As of October 1, 2015 there were 2,540 students enrolled.
There are 64 portable classrooms at the middle schools. Since 2011, the District added sixteen
(16) new portable classrooms, which provide temporary capacity. Of the 64 portable
classrooms, 20 provide permanent capacity for approximately 460 students.
In 2011, the Multi Track Year Round Task Force recommended that sixth grade become a part
of the elementary schools, thereby delaying the need for middle school space and increasing
the need for elementary schools which saves the taxpayers the higher cost of building a new
middle school. The board approved the configuration change on October 11, 2011. This
change has been implemented in the current (2015-16) school year.
C. High Schools
As detailed more fully in the 2011-2017 CFP, there are two traditional high schools serving
grades 9-12. There is capacity to serve 3,931 students in the high schools. As of October 1,
2015 there were 4,904 students enrolled. One high school, Pasco High, also has 25 portable
classrooms, which provide permanent capacity for approximately 500 students.
There is one alternative high school that serves grades 9-12. The alternative school is currently
located in 11 portable classrooms and serves over 200 students.
No portables were added at the high schools since 2011.
D. Support Facilities
Bus parking has been expanded into the District's maintenance lay -down yard at the Port of
Pasco property (Building 210). The district will be leasing additional space from the Port to
replace the lost lay -down yard capacity.
D. Land Inventory
The District currently owns nine unimproved parcels. Seven are identified in the 2011-2017
CFP. Since 2014 the District acquired a 39 -acre parcel located east of Road 100, and
approximately nine and a half (9.5) acres at North Utah Avenue and East Salt Lake Street. The
district intends to sell a .33 acre parcel that was gifted to the district and is not suitable for
school purposes.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 6 of 19
March 2016
Page 16 of 34
SECTION 4
STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS
AND CAPACITY BY GRADE SPAN
A. Projected Student Enrollment
Since 2014 the District received and reviewed four enrollment forecasts. All four forecasts
predict increased enrollment. For purposes of the 2016 CFP Update, the District is relying on
the conservative 2015 enrollment forecast, which is prepared and published by OSPI. OSPI
forecasts are for six years, starting with actual enrollment in October.
In October 2011 there were 15,633 students enrolled in grades K-12. In October 2015 there
were 17,353 students enrolled, which is an increase of 1,720 students. By 2021, the forecast
predicts there will be 18,597 students enrolled in grades K-12, which is an additional 1,244
students over 2015. The District will need to add permanent and temporary capacity at the
elementary and secondary levels to serve the growth. Student enrollment projections can be
found in the Appendix, Chart 3.
B. Capacity by Grade Span
Enrollment in grades K-6 is forecast to grow by over 200 students. At the same time, class size
standards are expected to be reduced by the state. Based on the forecast enrollment increase
and the anticipated class size reduction, the district will need to add capacity for 2,381 students.
In grades 7-8, middle school enrollment in grades 7-8 is now at an acceptable level for class
size standards, allowing some room for enrollment growth at the middle level. However, class
size standards are also expected to be reduced. In that case, the district will need to add
capacity for 126 students.
Enrollment in grades 9-12 is currently 4,904 with permanent capacity for 3,931. High school
enrollment is over capacity and the forecast is for continued growth. The district is proceeding
with plans to relocate New Horizons High School which will add capacity for approximately 200
more students. The district will need to add capacity for 1,610 students at the high school level.
The current capacity in the existing schools and the capacity that is needed to serve forecast
growth through 2021 was revised based on class size reduction targets and construction
projects completed through December 31, 2015. Please see Chart 6 in the Appendix.
SECTION 5
CAPITAL FACILITIES NEEDS
To help districts meet the K-3 class size reduction enumerated in RCW 28A.150.260 and RCW
28A.150,315, 2015 the Legislature approved capital funds for a grant through the School
Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) to assist districts in building facilities to achieve the K-
3 class size reduction targets. OSPI determined the district is in need of 39 classrooms to
achieve K-3 class size reduction. Districts may not use the funds to add portable classrooms.
The district applied for the funds and is awaiting news of an award. There are insufficient funds
allocated by the state to fund every district which submitted for the grant. Regardless, if the
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 7 of 19
March 2016
Page 17 of 34
funds are sufficient and the funded project would be reasonably feasible, the district intends to
accept state funding. However, any additional capacity added through the grant would not
significantly address the need for added capacity due to enrollment growth.
To serve growth and address class size reduction, the District plans on constructing and
expanding additional elementary schools. The District will also relocate New Horizons High
School and expand Chiawana High School to serve 800 additional 9-12 grade students.
Portable classrooms will be used to serve additional growth and to provide temporary facilities
while funding is secured to construct brick and mortar facilities. The new schools and portable
classrooms will provide the needed capacity identified above.
In addition to building schools that add capacity for growth, the District will make other
improvements to serve students. The improvements will be constructed in phases and cannot
occur until bonds are approved by the voters. The Pasco Facilities Task Force was reconvened
in 2014-2015 and identified recommended priorities for the District. Future phases for
improvements incorporate the task force recommendations in the PFTF report which was
accepted by the Board of Directors on November 10, 2015. The improvements, along with the
added capacity and cost estimates, are set out in Chart 7 in the Appendix.
SECTION 6
CAPITAL FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
The District's ability to fund the planned improvements that will add capacity is dependent upon
the passage of bond elections at a 60% supermajority and receipt of State Construction
Assistance Program (SCAP) funds, also known as "state match" funds. Costs for improvements
that add capacity are used to calculate school impact fees. School impact fees, or SEPA
mitigation fees, will be used to pay for improvements that add capacity; however, they only
cover a portion of the costs for the needed improvements. The majority of the costs to construct
the improvements will be paid for with bonds and capital construction funds from the state once
bonds are approved in a special election.
In addition to construction of facilities to add capacity, the district also needs to acquire school
sites for future construction, and must make a variety of improvements that are needed at
existing facilities. A key PFTF priority was to address capital facilities needs related to safety
and health. The PFTF also recommended constructing a new middle school to serve central
Pasco (replacing Stevens Middle School) which would add capacity but also address significant
capital maintenance needs. Forecast funding sources for improvements are listed in Chart 8.
SECTION 7
SCHOOL IMPACT OR MITIGATION FEES
The District's ability to fund the improvements that are needed to serve forecast growth depends
on new development contributing to the cost to build the schools that will serve the students that
live in new housing. The District is collecting school impact fees from development in the City
and will continue to request mitigation fees from developers in Franklin County. The District
files annual reports with the City regarding the use of the school impact fees.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 8 of 19
March 2016
Page 18 of 34
The District has calculated school impact fees using the commonly accepted statewide formula,
which is in the City's impact fee ordinance. The fees are calculated based on forecast growth,
facilities that are needed to serve the growth, and the estimated costs for those facilities. The
calculated impact fee amounts, in Appendix B, are $5,706 for each single family residence and
$6,484 for each multi -family residence. However, the District is requesting the City continue
collecting the current amounts which are:
Single Family: $4,700
Multi Family: $4,525
The district began receiving impact fees from the City in 2012. To date, the district has received
$5,209,713. Of that amount, $1,250,000 was used to reduce the principal of the 2013 bond and
$2,208,772 was used to pay for a portion of the 2015-2016 portable classrooms. The district is
planning to use an additional $1,636,000 for portable classrooms in 2016, 2017, bringing the
balance to $114,941. The district will plan to use future impact fees as allowed by law, either for
continued portable classroom purchases, or towards the cost of construction of permanent
capacity to house students.
CONCLUSION
The District continues to use a variety of strategies to plan, reduce costs, and mitigate the
effects of student enrollment growth. Receipt of impact fees remains critical to ensuring the
District is able to manage growth by providing sufficient student facilities. The forecast of steady
enrollment growth over the next six years underscores the need to use a variety of financing
measures, including the passage of bonds, expenditure from the General Fund, and impact fees
to meet the needs of the community.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 9 of 19
March 2016
Page 19 of 34
2015-2016
Supporting Data
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 10 of 19
March 2016
Page 20 of 34
Chart 1
Permanent Capacity
October 1, 2015
Elementary
Schools
Grades
Served
High
Poverty?
Teaching
Stations*
Brick &
Mortar
Capacity"
Permanent
Portables
Total
Permanent
Capacity'
Oct. 1,
2015
Enroll.
Gra
K-6
Y
21
399
5
494
552
Markham
K-6
N
11
231
3
294
371
McGee
K-6
N
17
357
7
504
613
Twain
K-6
Y
20
380
8
532
778
An elou
K-6
N
26
546
8
714
935
Livingston
K-6
N
17
357
7
504
795
Whittier
K-2
Y
20
380
6
504
586
Robinson
K-6
Y
26
494
8
646
802
Emerson
K-6
Y
21
399
3
456
643
Longfellow
K-6
Y
19
361
3
418
439
Frost
K-6
Y
20
380
5
475
648
Chess
K-6
Y
21
399
2
437
559
Franklin STEM
K-6
N
29
609
0
609
745
McClintock STEM
K-6
N
28
588
0
588
649
Curie STEM
3-6
Y
30
570
0
570
793
TOTALS
6,450
65
7,735
9,908
Middle Schools
Grades
Served
High
Poverty?
Teaching
Stations*
Brick &
Mortar
Capacit **
Permanent
Portables
Total
Permanent
Capacit ***
Oct. 1,
2015
Enroll.
McLoughlin
7-8
N
40
988
10
1,238
1,183
Stevens
7-8
Y
27
612
5
727
654
Ochoa
7-8
Y
32
734
5
849
700
TOTAL
98
2,334
20
2,814
2,537
High Schools
Grades
Served
High
Poverty?
Teaching
Stations*
Brick &
Mortar
Capacity"
Permanent
Portables
Total
Permanent
Capacity'
Oct. 1,
2015
Enroll.
Pasco High School
9-12
Y
58
1328
25
1903
2,079
Chiawana HS
9-12
Y
88
2028
0
2028
2,557
New Horizons
9-12
Y
0
0
0
0
271
TOTAL
146
3,356
25
3,931
4,907
*Teaching stations are brick & mortar teaching stations from state report less rooms necessary for
specialized instruction such as Art, Music, Special Education, Technology, etc.
**Brick and Mortar Capacity is number of teaching stations multiplied by the average QEC class size
recommendations for grades K-6. For non -high poverty K-6 schools, the average is 21. For high poverty
K-6 schools, the average is 19.
***Total Permanent capacity adds the teaching stations in the permanent portables multiplied by the
average QEC class size recommendations for grades K-6 as listed above.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 11 of 19
March 2016
Page 21 of 34
Chart 2
Comparison Construction Costs Pasco Schools vs. Other WA Schools
Pasco Schools
Other WA Schools
Average New
2014-2015
STEM
$284.04
Washington State
$319.35
Elementary
Elementary Average
Schools*
2007-09
CHS
$211.56/sf
Other high schools
$247.18/sf and
$401.45/sf
Robinson
State average for
2005
Elementary
$140.11/sf
similar sized schools
$276/sf
in eastern WA
Angelou
State average for
2004
Elementary
$127.84/sf
similar sized schools
$206.80/sf
in eastern WA
2002
Ochoa Middle
$118.81/sf
Middle School
$167.41/sf
School
Source: OSPI March 3, 2016
http://www. k12. wa. us/SchFacilities/Programs/SchoolConstructionProjects. aspx
*Average per square foot cost for new construction of Franklin, McClintock, and Curie STEM Elementary
Schools.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 12 of 19
March 2016
Page 22 of 34
Chart 3
Pasco School District Asset Preservation Program
2016 Building Condition Scores
"B.C.E." is the Building Condition Evaluation score given by OSPI for those facilities in which
State School Construction Assistance Program (state match) dollars were used. The
Current Draft Score" is OSPI's expected score for the age of the facility, given average use
and maintenance.
Pasco High School is no longer assigned a B.C.E. score for purposes of state reporting
because of the age of the facility. However, the district continues to monitor and score Pasco
High School for internal monitoring purposes.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 13 of 19
March 2016
Page 23 of 34
OSPI
2014
2015
2016
Current
Age in
Draft Score
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Building
Years
by Age
B.C.E.
B.C.E.
B.C.E.
Emerson Elementary
19
79
86.94
87.94
87.94
Frost Elementary
19
79
86.44
86.44
86.44
Pasco High School
63
62
70.33
73.12
NA
Chiawana High School
7
94
98.05
95.40
95.3
Franklin STEM Elementary
1
100
NA
NA
100
"B.C.E." is the Building Condition Evaluation score given by OSPI for those facilities in which
State School Construction Assistance Program (state match) dollars were used. The
Current Draft Score" is OSPI's expected score for the age of the facility, given average use
and maintenance.
Pasco High School is no longer assigned a B.C.E. score for purposes of state reporting
because of the age of the facility. However, the district continues to monitor and score Pasco
High School for internal monitoring purposes.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 13 of 19
March 2016
Page 23 of 34
Chart 5
OSPI Actual and Projected Enrollments 2015-2021
October 1, 2015
Actual --- PROJECTED ENROLLMENTS ---
Grade 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Kindergarten
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
K-6 Sub -Total
Grade 7
Grade 8
6-8 Sub -Total
Grade 9
Grade 10
Grade 11
Grade 12
9-12 Sub -Total
DISTRICT K-12 TOTAL
1,354
1,424
1,427
1,431
1,435
1,439
1,442
1,457
1,381
1,452
1,456
1,460
1,464
1,468
1,513
1,459
1,383
1,454
1,458
1,462
1,466
1,489
1,508
1,454
1,379
1,449
1,453
1,457
1,433
1,491
1,510
1,456
1,381
1,451
1,455
1,383
1,443
1,501
1,520
1,466
1,391
1,461
1,280
1,359
1,418
1,475
1,494
1,441
1,367
9,909 10,065 10,145 10,171 10,143 10,101 10,116
1,323 1,283 1,363 1,422 1,479 1,498 1,445
1,217 1,320 1,280 1,360 1,419 1,476 1,495
2,540
2,603
2,643
2,782
2,898
2,974
2,940
1,289
1,416
1,536
1,490
1,583
1,651
1,718
1,200
1,066
1,171
1,271
1,233
1,310
1,366
1,131
1,126
1,000
1,099
1,192
1,157
1,229
1,284
1,200
1,195
1,061
1,166
1,265
1,228
4,904
4,808
4,902
4,921
5,174
5,383
5,541
17,353
17,476
17,690
17,874
18,215
18,458
18,597
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 14 of 19
March 2016
Page 24 of 34
Chart 6
2021 Needed Student Capacity
Permanent
Capacity
2016
Forecast
Enrollment
2021
Needed
Capacity
2021
Elementary (K-6) 7,735
10,116
2,381
Middle (7-8) 2,814
2,940
126
High (9-12) 3,931
5,541
1,610
"Permanent Capacity" is the 2016 brick and mortar teaching stations from the state report,
less the number of rooms necessary for specialized instruction such as Art, Music, Special
Education, Technology, etc. Permanent capacity is calculated based upon the QEC
recommended K-12 class sizes for high poverty and non -high poverty schools.
"Forecast Enrollment 2021" is based on the OSPI 2016 six-year enrollment forecast. This
forecast is updated annually.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 15 of 19
March 2016
Page 25 of 34
Chart 7
Necessary Facility Improvements, Added Capacity and Costs
2016 Update
Necessary Facility
Estimated
Estimated
Improvements
Additional Capacity
Total Cost
REMAINING 2013 BOND PROJECT ESTIMATES
New Horizons High School
200
$4,100,000
Relocation
Pasco High School Science
100
$5,400,000
Classrooms and Improvements
Other School Site
$3,930,000
Improvements
Total Remaining 2013
300
$13,430,000
Bond Projects
ESTIMATED PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS & CAPACITY
CONDITIONED ON FUTURE BOND AND STATE ASSISTANCE
Phase 1
New Elementary School #16
600
$28,500,000
New Elementary School #17
600
$29,700,000
Stevens MS Replacement and
375
$69,000,000
Expansion
CHS Expansion
400
$11,100,000
Curie ES Expansion
80
$1,800,000
Land Acquisition (160 acres)
$6,400,000
Support Services Expansion
$2,810,000
and Capital Improvements
Capital Improvements for
$6,259,000
Safetyand Health
Total Permanent Capacity
2,055
$155,569,000
ESTIMATED PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS & CAPACITY
CONDITIONED ON FUTURE BOND AND STATE ASSISTANCE
Phase 2
New Elementary School #18 600 $30,900,000
New Elementary School #19 600 $32,200,000
Total Permanent Capacity 1,200 $63,100,000
TEMPORARY CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS
18 Portable ES Classrooms
378
$2,900,000
18 Portable HS Classrooms
414
$2,900,000
Total
792
$5,800,000
TOTALS
4,347
$237,899,000
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 16 of 19
March 2016
Page 26 of 34
Chart 8
Capital Facilities Financing Plan
Project Estimates
Project Estimates
Project
Added
Capacity
Est.
Cost
Source of Funding
Bonds
State Match
Impact/
Mitigation
Fees
General
Fund
New Horizons HS
Relocation
200
$4,100,000
$4,100,000
0
0
0
Pasco High School
Science Rooms & Imp.
100
$5,400,000
$2,700,000
$2,700,000
0
0
Other Site
Improvements
NA
$3,930,000
$3,930,000
Elementary #16
600
$28,500,000
$14,300,000
$13,800,000
$ 400,000
0
Elementary #17
600
$29,700,000
$15,800,000
$13,700,000
$ 200,000
0
Stevens MS Replace
and Expand
375
$69,000,000
$32,000,000
$37,000,000
0
0
Chiawana HS
Expansion
400
$11,100,000
$6,000,000
$5,100,000
0
0
Curie ES Expansion
80
$1,800,000
1,800,000
0
0
0
Land Acquisition
NA
$ 6,400,000
$6,400,000
0
0
0
Support Services
Expansion
NA
$2,810,000
$1,405,000
0
0
$1,405,000
Capital Improvements
for Safety & Health
NA
$6,259,000
$5,000,000
0
0
$1,259,000
Portable Classrooms
700
$5,800,000
0
0
$4,500,000
$1,300,000
Elementar #18
600
$30,900,000
$17,000,000
$13,900,000
1 0
1 0
Elementary #19
600
$32,200,000
$18,300,000
$13,900,000
1 0
10
This number is an estimate of state match and is subject to verification by OSPI.
** This number is an estimate that assumes housing development will occur at a rate
estimated by growth projections.
*** This amount is less than the other similar elementary school because the district already
owned the land and had already completed much of the architectural and engineering
work in preparation for shovel ready construction when the bond passed.
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 17 of 19
March 2016
Page 27 of 34
APPENDIX B
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 18 of 19
March 2016
Page 28 of 34
PASCO SC"OOL DISTRICT
2016 impact Fee
SIF -r 9.SF)-(,SWJ-Ir'+r.x_1f'x1L22)]x-1-F'C
Single Family Residence=
Ownerrtaryt
Middle School
115P Schaal
$21256D,DCICAD
SD.CO
52D,E+06,000.6]
6713
1
713]
347,636.C71)
$D.00
529.428.E
0.31 D
6.056
6.1 D3
$14,725 -CO
$0-00
$2,542. 6
32}6.76
5266.76
5X+3.76
96AD
117.DD
130. DO
61.93%
81.9396
@1.53%
KT25.22
$0.1m
3$2o2.18
$9,958-76
$0-6O
WCAS
Muilti-Farnily Residence=
2rY% reduction
APPENDIX B
Formula
Facltty CM
Adiditional Capaelty
Cuc&1 per St&rderrt ;
ent Factnr,,' =:
CSxsF
€;uPl 5q Ft
S1� Matcn Elgl3ll y %
urate Ma" CrEdi:DY
CS x SF -!IN
Cast perS11re91a FarNyReelaearce•
0.6356
AWerW Int&eStRa1E
6.41579751
Tac Credit Nrrnerdtorr
0.1356509191
Tal CrLKM DenixTlnatcir
8.2315 1 69 87
Tax CiredH Mutpler:TCMIj
3151.3m. D]
A a e.racp Assessed Valu a I,A,4V }
1254905.67
TCM x AAV
D.130250
Tal[ ".Fey 93Le jT�_ft"
33.131.29
TGM x.SAV xTLR='-C1
$0.60
Coat per SLAiVile Family Reeldence - Tax Credo
3T,9C2.D5 25% rE-ducxan r.
$5,7m.1.6 Calculated Single Farnfly Fee Amount
$4,7011 Recomm4rwM Foe Amount
Elementary
Middle School
Hifi Schaal
$2E. X,DXA0
5D.CD
52DI,E+OD.GM.133
67D
1
i6]
S47.530OD
513:60
525,448. 7
0.270
6.CW
6176]
412,525.19
$0.60
$Z3M.25
3206.76
5266.76
51 EJ]. 17
9610
117.66
130. D]
61.93%
&1.93%
81.53%
$4,115.38
50.0D
31.5.5.1&
$5,708-62
$0-1010
$815.11
0.6356
6.418}9751
D.D50569191
8.2915187
3x814-3.69
D.6D240
5-M 1.7+7
S2,1E1.a1
$6,40,11.52
$4,.525
Formula
Facility C=
A1ir Meal Capadtyf
CLs.1 per student
11udent Factor ,._.-
CSxSF
E0120111L Irdex
CkaPI Sq Ft
Match Elgl illry %.
} Ve Maul CrEd1 ;�_,,pr
C3x5F-SM
Caetper MulllfandlyReelderrce
A'eerap IrrterestRME-
Tan[[ Credit Nrrnerdtor
Tax Credit Denominat r
Tax Coedit WnpleryTCM}
A EregeAssessed3da1a[AALV}
TCM x AAV
Tait LWey Pate M_R}
TGM x AAV x TLR = [TC]
CL*et per IllWttfarrllly Residence -Tax CreAt
25% rEd action 'A.:
Calculated lurltl- FarNBy Fax Amaourit
RecomnvxK ed Fee Aamoorrt
Pasco School District Capital Facilities Plan Update
Page 19 of 19
March 2016
Page 29 of 34
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council
April 1, 2016
TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 4/11/16
FROM: Rick White, Director
Community & Economic Development
SUBJECT: Vehicular Parking and Storage
I. REFERENCE(S):
Draft Ordinance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
Use of the public right-of-way for vehicle storage can become problematic for
neighborhoods and commercial areas. Vehicles stored within the right of way for long
periods of time can block access for emergency response, limit the access of abutting
property owners/residents, impact the ability to conduct maintenance activities and in
some cases decrease the value or marketability of a property. In commercial areas
parking is typically limited by ordinance or is sufficiently distant from residential areas
unattended vehicles over a prolonged period of time are not common.
In contrast, residential street parking is largely unregulated and complaints from within
residential areas are however on the rise. As an example, in January this year, Council
received input from a citizen that was concerned with long term parking of vehicles on
public streets. In that situation, the vehicle was licensed, not obviously disabled, was
accumulating debris underneath as it had not moved for a long period of time and was
owned by a person near to where the vehicle is parked. It appeared obvious the public
street was being used for vehicle storage.
Complaints with the Police Department and Code Enforcement were lodged. As the
vehicle was on a public street, Code Enforcement did not have jurisdiction through the
Pasco Municipal Code. As the vehicle was licensed and was not by definition "junk" or
"abandoned," the Police Department was not able to cite the vehicle's owner for a
Page 30 of 34
traffic or code offense.
An inventory of applicable PMC regulations as well as the applicable State law and
Administrative Code confirm that this situation does not fall cleanly into a category for
enforcement. For example:
Title 9 of the PMC (Nuisances) regulates nuisances but basically limits
regulating vehicles to those "abandoned, "junk" or determined to be "vehicle
hulks."
Title 10 of the PMC (Vehicles and Traffic) regulates vehicles in a variety of
settings on public streets but not if the vehicle is less than 14,000 lbs. gross
weight, is licensed and isn't a recreational vehicle (including RV's, boats,
trailers...).
Title 12 of the PMC (Streets and Sidewalks) regulates vehicles in a variety of
settings including spillage of material on public streets, parking on swales or
planting strips or otherwise interfering with normal use of the street - but not
the parking (even for long periods) of licensed and maintained vehicles.
Title 25 of the PMC (Zoning) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings but
limits the regulations to those occurring on private property.
Council reviewed the draft Ordinance at the Workshop meetings of February 22 and
March 14, 2016. The current version is reflective of Council comments from those two
sessions.
V. DISCUSSION:
The most direct way to address issues of this type is to amend the PMC to provide a
restriction on the parking of vehicles on public streets for longer than a set amount of
time and/or other locations.
It is most likely that enforcement of this issue will be by complaint and the initial
notice or "tag" upon an unauthorized vehicle will be placed by a Police Officer or a
Code Enforcement Officer.
This most recent draft Ordinance contains shortened time periods for compliance but
substitutes enforcement by impoundment with enforcement by citation. Impoundment
of vehicles is recommended only for chronic offenders (same vehicle cited for storage
on the public streets twice within any 180 day period or that remains on the public
street 30 days or more after citation).
Page 31 of 34
CI : 1 L .Wye -013
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, adding a new Section
10.48.015 "Parking Across Designated Parking Lines" and adding a new Section
10.52.035 "Prohibiting Extended Unauthorized Parking" to the Pasco Municipal Code
WHEREAS, Title 10 of the Pasco Municipal Code regulates parking on public streets; and
WHEREAS, Title 10 of the Pasco Municipal Code does not contain a provision for regulation of
parking on public streets otherwise functioning and licensed vehicles for extended periods of time; and
WHEREAS, Parking of vehicles for extended periods of time on public streets or other
municipal property causes build - up of debris under vehicles and invites acts of vandalism or other crime;
and
WHEREAS, Parking of vehicles for extended periods of time and storage of other personal
effects on public streets or other municipal property has adverse effects on the ability of the street or
property to effectively serve its main purpose of providing a safe and efficient mode of transportation or
location for public services; NOW THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That a new Section of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is added and
shall read as follows:
10.48.015 PARKING ACROSS DESIGNATED LINES PROHIBITED. Parkin across
cross
designated parking space lines is prohibited on public streets as identified in 10.48.020.
1 17►�11•►�%9i. 12=11 7LoI.r 11 1M."Iffi" 11ol 7.11101 ,41210
ANGLE PARKING PERMITTED
NAME OF STREET
FROM
TO
S. 2nd Avenue, west side
Lewis
Columbia
N. 2nd Avenue, west side
Clark
Bonneville
N. 2nd Avenue, west side
Yakima
Shoshone
S. 3rd Avenue, west side
Lewis
Columbia
S. 4th Avenue, west side
Columbia
South Street
S. 4th Lane
"A" Street
"C" Street
N. 4th Avenue
Clark
Columbia
S. 5th Avenue, west side
"A" Street
"B" Street
N. 5th Avenue, east side
Jan
Bypass
S. 6th Avenue
Columbia, south
170 ft.
N. 6th Avenue
Shoshone
North to alley
S. 7th Lane, west side
"A" Street
"B" Street
S. 7th Avenue
ANGLE PARKING PERMITTED (continued)
Lewis
Columbia
Page 32 of 34
N. 8th Avenue
Clark
Lewis
9th Avenue, east side
`B" Street, north
300 ft (head -in)
9th Avenue
Clark
Lewis
10th Avenue, west side
Nixon
Sylvester (head -in)
N. 11th Avenue
Bonneville
Shoshone
N. 12th Avenue, west side
Sylvester, south
Irving
N. 12th Avenue, west side
Sylvester, north
Nixon
Ainsworth
1 Ith Avenue, east
130 ft.
Columbia, south side
Tacoma
1 st Avenue
Columbia, north side
2nd Avenue
5th Avenue
Columbia
5th Avenue
7th Avenue
Columbia, north side
7th Avenue, west
560 ft.
Clark, south side
2nd Avenue
5th Avenue
Bonneville, north side
1 st Avenue
2nd Avenue
2nd Avenue
5th Avenue
(except west of 4th Avenue for 150 ft.)
Bonneville, south side
14th Avenue, east
230 ft
Bonneville, north side
14th Avenue
15th Avenue
Bonneville, north side
14th Avenue, east
300 ft
Hopkins, south side
14th Avenue,
180 ft.
Hopkins, north side
14th Avenue, east
250 ft.
Hassalo, north side
14th Avenue
15th Avenue
Shoshone, south side
14th Avenue, east
130 ft.
Shoshone, south side
15th Avenue
16th Avenue
Shoshone, north side
6th Avenue, west
200 ft.
Shoshone, north side
10th Avenue, west
315 ft.
Yakima, south side
10th Avenue, west
245 ft.
Sylvester, north side
10th Avenue
12th Avenue
Irving, south side
10th Avenue
15th Avenue
Irving, south side
14th Avenue
15th Avenue (head -in)
Irving, north side
10th Avenue
12th Avenue
Nixon, south side
10th Avenue
12th Avenue
Nixon, south side
7th Avenue, east
5th Avenue
Nixon
3rd Avenue, east
One-half block
Margaret, north side
12th Avenue, west
200 ft.
Henry, north side
14th Avenue, east
One-half block
Henry, north side
10th Avenue, west
One-half block
and east
200 ft.
Court, north side
7th Avenue, west
300 ft.
Section 2. That a new Section of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is added and
shall read as follows:
10.52.035 EXTENDED UNAUTHORIZED PARKING PROHIBITED. (1) No person shall
park a vehicle on any street or other municipal property for a period of time longer than 14 days, unless
an official posted sign provides a shorter period of time, or unless otherwise provided by law.
Page 33 of 34
(2) Authorized vehicles on municipal property are excluded from the provisions of this Section,
as are vehicles displayin vg alid proof of payment when parked in spaces controlled by a parking payment
device.
(3) Penalties: Any vehicle found to be in violation of this Section is declared to be a public
nuisance, and shall be subject to a Class IV Civil Infraction as defined by PMC 1.02.080. Any vehicle
cited under this section two or more times in any 180 day period or that remains in violation of this
Section 30 or more days after citation may be impounded if no operator is present who will immediately
comply with this Section.
(4) Notice to Owner:
a) A law enforcement officer discovering a previously cited and unauthorized vehicle as
described in Section 10.52.035 (3) left within a street right-of-way or other municipal property shall
attach to the vehicle a readily visible notification. The notification shall contain the following
information:
b) The date and time the notification was attached;
c) The identity of the officer;
d) A statement that if the vehicle is not removed within 72 hours from the time the notification
is attached, the vehicle may be taken into custody and stored at the owner's expense;
e) A statement that if the vehicle is not redeemed as provided in RCW 46.55.120, the vehicle
may be declared an abandoned vehicle and sold according to the terms of RCW 46.55.130;
f) The address and telephone number where additional information may be obtained.
(5) Relocation of a vehicle for purposes of avoiding impound or citation is prohibited. Vehicles
must be relocated a minimum of 20 feet for a minimum duration of 48 hours from the location where the
vehicle was noticed or the citation issued.
(6) Unauthorized storage of personal effects, in conjunction with use of a vehicle or not, on any
public street or municipal property is prohibited.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as
required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, at its regular meeting of
2016.
Matt Watkins, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra Clark, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Page 34 of 34