Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016.02.22 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. February 22, 2016 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: 3 - 4 (a) Downtown Pasco Development Authority 2015 Annual Report 5-30 (b) Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan 31 -36 (c) Vehicular Parking and Storage 37-38 (d) Downtown Sidewalk and Street Discussion - Presentation 39-41 (e) PMC Amendments for Intentional Acts 42-55 (f) Fire Station Options - Road 48 56-57 (g) Golf Course Project Funding 58-60 (h) Residential Street/Road Size Standards Report (Informational) 61 -65 (i) Chapel Hill Roadway Design - Professional Services Agreement with TranTech 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 7. ADJOURNMENT. Page 1 of 65 Workshop Meeting REMINDERS: February 22, 2016 4:00 p.m., Monday, February 22, Ben -Franklin Transit Office — Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; SAUL MARTINEZ, Alt.) 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, February 23, TRAC — TRAC Advisory Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS and COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY) 7:30 a.m., Wednesday, February 24, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd — Visit Tri -Cities Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) 4:00 p.m., Thursday, February 25, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd — TRIDEC Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) 8:00 a.m., Friday, February 26, WSU Consolidated Information Center — National Park Partnerships Workshop. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS) 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, March 2, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue — Franklin County Mosquito Control District Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.) 5:30 p.m., Thursday, March 3, P&R Classroom — Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER SAUL MARTINEZ, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.2ov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 2 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 17, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Downtown Pasco Development Authority 2015 Annual Report I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: City Council formed the DPDA in December of 2010 to undertake revitalization of the Downtown area, provide management of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen and Farmer's Market and promote utilization of the fagade improvement program funded through Community Development Block Grant funds. The DPDA was licensed in Washington State as a non-profit corporation in May of 2011 and a full Board was appointed in July of 2011. The current Funding Agreement with the DPDA (which expires in December this year) provides for an annual report to be submitted to City Council prior to the end of February. V. DISCUSSION: This past year, a number of important objectives were achieved by the DPDA, including: Certification as a Main Street Community; Qualification for the Main Street Tax Credit Reimbursement Program which allows the City to receive a tax credit of $67,500 in 2016 for the City's $90,000 contribution in 2015; Page 3 of 65 Establishing the Food Truck Friday event which ran continuously through most of 2015; and Conducting a successful Cinco de Mayo Celebration. The DPDA also conducted significant outreach to the Downtown business community associated with the City's visioning effort for development of the core area (4th/Lewis) and subsequent revitalization plans in addition to conducting Business Education Seminars for downtown businesses. The Christmas Tree Lighting ceremony was conducted during the month of December and provided a fitting note at the end of the year on the resiliency and resourcefulness of the Downtown community. The ceremony was organized spontaneously by the DPDA Board with the invaluable assistance of downtown businesses and interested parties. Board members of the DPDA will provide a presentation for the 2015 Annual Report at the February 22nd Workshop Meeting and will be available to answer Council questions. Page 4 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 11, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution Franklin County 2015 Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Franklin County Emergency Management is required by federal and state law to have a "Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan." This plan defines the methods, procedures and roles and responsibilities for participants in the event of disasters within Franklin County. Periodically, Franklin County Emergency Management finds a need to update the plan. V. DISCUSSION: Sean Davis, Director, Franklin County Emergency Management will attend the meeting of February 22 to report briefly on last year's Emergency Management activities, as well as to outline the basics of the 2015 Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan update for Council and answer questions. Page 5 of 65 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City of Pasco, Washington accepting and adopting the 2015 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is part of an interlocal agreement which establishes Franklin County Emergency Management governed by RCW 38.52.070; and WHEREAS, the Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan establishes the framework for an effective system to mitigate emergencies and disasters within the County and its municipalities; and WHEREAS, the plan outlines the roles and responsibilities of the City of Pasco in the event of natural, manmade or technological emergencies or disasters; and WHEREAS, It is important that the City is able to assist its citizens in the event of emergencies or disasters; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, 1. Accepts and adopts the 2015 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. 2. Will comply with the sections of the plan that address the responsibility of the City of Pasco for emergencies or disasters affecting the City. 3. Recognizes that in the event of a major emergency or disaster outside assistance to the community may take up to 72 hours. The City will prepare itself to operate independently for up to 72 hours. 4. Will encourage the citizens of the City of Pasco to prepare themselves to survive up to 72 hours without assistance of the City, County, State or Federal Government. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at its regular meeting this 7th day of March 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 6 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Enzeixeircy Mann ment Plan Basic Plan FRANKLIN COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Promulgation Memorandum Foreword Distribution List Record of Changes Basic Plan: Introduction 3 Policies 4 Situation 7 Concept of Operations 9 Responsibilities 16 Appendices: Appendix 1 Direction and Control Appendix 1-1 Appendix 2 Public Information Annex 3-1 2-1 Appendix 3 References _Appendix Appendix 3-1 Appendix 4 Definitions and Acronyms Appendix 4-1 Appendix 5 Administration Appendix 5-1 Appendix 6 Training and Exercises „ Appendix 6-1 Appendix 7 Hazard Vulnerability Analysis Appendix 7-1 Appendix 8 Hazardous Weather Appendix 8-1 Annexes: Annex I Pasco Annex 1-1 Annex 2 Connell Annex 2-1 Annex 3 Mesa Annex 3-1 Annex 4 Kahlotus Annex 4-1 Annex 5 Unincorporated - Franklin Count, Annex 5-1 Emergency Support Functions: ESF 1 Transportation ESF 1-1 ESF 2 Communications, Information Systems, and Warning ESF 2-1 ESF 3 Public Works and Engineering ESF 3-1 ESF 4 Firefighting ESF 4-1 ESF 5 Emergency Management ESF 5-1 ESF 6 Mass Care, Housing and Human Services ESF 6-1 ESF 7_ Resource Support ESF 7-1 10I5 - CEMP Page 1 Page 7 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emei ency Management Plan Basic Plan ESF 8 Public Health and Medical Services ESF 8-1 ESF 8A Mass Fatality Plan ESF 8A-1 ESF 9 Search and Rescue ESF 9-1 ESF 9A Mass Missing Person ESF 9A-1 ESF l0A _ Hazardous Materials Response ESF1Oa-1 ESF l OB United States Department of Ener — RL ESF l Ob -1 ESF 1 OC Radiological Emergency Response: Energy Northwest ESF lOc-1 ESF 11 Agriculture and Natural Resources ESF 11-1 ESF 12 Energy ESF 12-1 ESF 13 Public Safety, Law Enforcement, and Security ESF 13-1 ESF 14 Long Term Community RecoveLy ESF 14-1 ESF 15 Public Affairs ESF 15-1 ESF 20 Militga Su ort to Civil Authorities ESF 20-1 2015 - CEMP Page 2 Page 8 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Entergowy Management Plan Basic Plan I. INTRODUCTION A. Mission This plan is issued by the Franklin County Emergency Management Board. The Board is made up of elected representatives of Franklin County, Washington and all incorporated Cities in the County as stipulated by the Inter Local Agreement. The Board's mission is to provide, coordinate and facilitate resources to minimize the impacts of disasters and emergencies on people, property, the environment and the economy of Franklin County and the incorporated Cities within Franklin County. Through planning, coordination, education, training, and community awareness, we will prepare for; respond to; recover from; and mitigate the effects of a disaster for all who live, work or visit here. B. Purpose The purpose of this Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) is to provide a framework for effective utilization of government and private sector resources to mitigate, respond to and recover from emergencies in order to protect the lives, property and environment of the residents of Franklin County. C. Scope The Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) is an all hazard plan that is promulgated by the Franklin County Emergency Management Executive Board. This plan is an all -hazards approach to emergency and disaster situations likely to occur in the county, as described in the Franklin County Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Analysis (HIVA, Appendix 7), and provides the foundation for: I . The establishment of an organization and responsibilities for efficient and effective use of government, private sector and volunteer resources. 2. An outline of local government responsibilities in emergency management activities as described under Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 38.52 and other applicable laws. 3. An outline of other participants' responsibilities in emergency management activities as agreed upon by the participating agencies and organizations D. Organization The CEMP utilizes Emergency Support Functions (ESFs), which identify sources for direct assistance and operational support that the state and local jurisdictions may need in order to implement hazard mitigation and preparedness or respond and recover from an emergency or disaster. The CEMP consists of 1. The Basic Plan, which identifies policies and concepts of operations that guide the mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery activities. 2. The ESFs, which describe the mission, policies, concepts of operation, and responsibilities of primary and support agencies involved in the implementation of activities. 2015 - CEMP Page 3 Page 9 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan _ Basic Plan The Franklin County Emergency Management Executive Board consists of seven representatives: Two Franklin County Commissioners, the Mayor and City Manager from Pasco or his/her designee, the Mayors of Connell, Mesa and Kahlotus or their designee(s). Franklin County Emergency Management (FCEM) consists of a Director, an Executive Administrator and two Coordinators. The Director reports to and receives direction from the Executive Board. Franklin County Emergency Management is responsible for developing and maintaining the Franklin County CEMP; coordinating within Franklin County and its cities for preparedness planning; maintaining the County Emergency Coordination Center (ECC) along with providing training to staff and responders. H. POLICIES A. Authorities RCW 38.52.070/ WAC 118-30-060 directs each political subdivision of Washington State to establish a local organization for emergency management according to the State emergency management plan and program. Franklin County Emergency Management is established through an Interlocal Cooperative Agreement between Franklin County, The Cities of Pasco, Connell, Mesa and Kahlotus, as authorized by RCW 38.52. B. Responsibilities 1. Franklin County Emergency Management is responsible for maintaining and administering this Plan. The governments of Franklin County and the Cities of Pasco, Connell, Kahlotus and Mesa subscribe to this Plan and are responsible for executing its provisions. Each individual municipality will utilize the National Incident Management System and Incident Command System concepts/principles when developing their jurisdiction specific details emergency operating procedures/guides. 2. Legislative authority of the County Commissioners and City Councils are for: a. Emergency Management (1) Ultimately responsible for the emergency management program and organization and provide overall direction in the development of emergency mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery programs. b. Declaration of Emergency (1) Activation of the appropriate parts of this plan, and certain emergency powers, by declaration of emergency. A declaration of emergency must be made by the local legislative authority to request state or federal assistance Local government resources (1) Ensure that all available local government resources are 2015 - CEMP Page 4 Page 10 of 65 Franklin Cou= CoMrehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic flan utilized to the maximum extent possible. d. Emergency ex enditures (1) Authorize expenditure of funds necessary to combat the disaster, protect health and safety of persons and property, and provide assistance to disaster victims, as appropriate. e. Prioritizing emergency resources (1) Policy Ievel decisions involving the acquisition and distribution of food and water, supplies, equipment and other material when critical shortages exist or are anticipated. f. Impressment of citizens (1) Command the services and equipment of private citizens as necessary in response to the disaster after proclamation by the governor. C. Local government responsibilities 1. In carrying out the provisions of the emergency management program, the legislative authority of the political subdivisions of the state are responsible for utilizing the services, equipment, supplies and facilities of existing departments; and the personnel of such departments are directed to cooperate with the emergency management organization upon request (RCW 38.52.110). a. Chair of Board of County Commissioners / City Mayors (1) Shall act as the single point of contact, for the legislative body of their jurisdiction, for emergency policy decisions. b. Emergency Management Director/Manager (1) Responsible for establishing and maintaining emergency response coordination, including planning, training, development of incident management facilities, dissemination and implementation of plans and coordination of resources. G. Incident Command agencies (1) These agencies have established day-to-day responsibility for specific services within a specific jurisdiction (fire districts and departments, law enforcement agencies, public works departments, etc.). They are also responsible for providing trained incident commanders and staff when required, responsible for management of the emergency response and recovery according to the plan and responsible for establishing direction and control facilities at the incident. d. Participating agencies and organizations (1) Responsible for providing necessary staff in time of emergency, providing emergency funding and resources, 2015 - CEMP Page 5 Page 11 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic flan providing audit/accounting personnel to track expenses, participate in training and exercises, providing representatives to incident management as a point of contact during emergencies, and committing agency workers, equipment and resources to the cooperative effort. D. Limitations 1. No guarantee is implied by this plan to a perfect response system. Assets are vulnerable to terrorism, natural and technological problems which may limit response. It is the policy of Franklin County to make every reasonable effort within its capabilities to respond to emergencies based on the situation, information and resources available and skill/training level of available responders. 2. This plan is not intended to deal with every potential scenario that may occur during times of emergency, but rather identify the organization, the processes and the responsibilities of the respective participants who may be involved. The possibility of local resources becoming overwhelmed is a reality, the participating jurisdictions can only make a reasonable effort to respond based on the situation(s), information and the resources available at the time of the disaster. 3. The disaster response, relief and recovery activities of the Emergency Management Organization may be limited by: a. Inability of the general citizenry to function on their own for more than three days without additional supplies of water, food, shelter and medical supplies. b. Lack of police, fire, emergency medical services and public works response due to damage to facilities, equipment and shortages of personnel. C. The limited number of public safety responders in a jurisdiction. d. The shortage of trained response personnel and equipment needed to handle a disaster. C. The shortage of critical supplies. £ Damage to essential services and facilities, such as roads, rail, utilities and communication networks. g. Damage to emergency services communication networks. h. The availability of outside assistance and resources. 4. Emergency situations are difficult, if not impossible to predict. The local emergency management system must be flexible and be able to function under a variety of unanticipated complex and unique circumstances. S. There is no guarantee implied by this plan that perfect mitigation, preparation, response, and recovery will be practical or possible. It is the policy of Franklin County to make every reasonable effort within it capabilities to respond to emergencies based on the situation, information, skill/training levels of responders and resources available. 6. This plan does not supersede any state, local or federal laws and/or codes. 2015-CEMP Pale 6 Page 12 of 65 Franklin County Cor=rehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan, 7. All response agencies will utilize their agency's standard operating guides and procedures in accordance with any and all local and state laws/ordinances for response, planning, preparedness and mitigation activities. 8. All response agencies will respond appropriately in accordance with their training credentials, certifications, levels as dictated by their agency's standard operating guidelines and/or procedures. 9. Response agencies will review and suggest updates to the CEMP as their agency's standard operating guides, procedures and training certifications/levels change and impact the overall planning process. III. SITUATION A. Emergency/Disaster Conditions and Hazards I . Franklin County is vulnerable to the damaging effects of natural disasters including drought, earthquake, floods, land movement, severe local storms and volcanic eruptions. Franklin County is also vulnerable to a variety of technological hazards including dam failure, energy emergencies, chemical, radiological and hazardous materials incidents from transportation as well as fixed facilities and both urban and wild land fire. These and other hazards and their potential effects are described in the Hazard Vulnerability Analysis, (HIVA), see appendix 7 in this document. This is a planning tool designed to prepare the agency for the impacts of known and suspected hazard conditions. Vulnerability assessments are also identified in the Franklin County Hazard Mitigation Plan, published separately. 2. Emergencies or disasters could occur in the county at any time causing significant human suffering, injury and death, public and private property damage, environmental degradation, loss of essential services, economic hardships to businesses, families, and individuals and disruption of governmental entities. B. Planning Assumptions This CEMP is based on the fallowing general assumptions: I . Local government officials recognize their responsibilities with regard to public safety and accept them in the implementation of this plan. Coordination exists between emergency response organizations on a daily basis. This interaction is based on the frequent and routine practice of day- to-day responses. Agencies and organizations that support this plan will assist in the planning process and will participate in training classes and exercises which are designed to increase the overall preparedness posture of Franklin County. 2. The primary purpose of this plan is to establish a framework for large scale disasters/emergencies that overwhelm local response capabilities. This plan does not supersede/override any established procedures, 2015 - CEMP Pane 7 Page 13 of 65 Franklin County Carnprehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan authorities or standards which have been established for routine local emergencies. 3. Demand on emergency response agencies becomes much greater in times of crisis, and the prioritization of response to an emergency becomes critical. In addition, the resource of many of the supporting public and private organizations, that normally do not interact except in a crisis, need to be mobilized on a cooperative basis. 4. Appropriate local agencies will, within their capabilities according to the four phases of emergency management, prepare for emergencies and disaster to ensure continuity of government, safe keeping of vital records and to mobilize in support of local responders by staffing the EGG. 5. Citizens, businesses, local agencies and industries of the county will utilize their own resources and provide for themselves during the first three days of an emergency or disaster. 6. Pasco Fire Department and Franklin County Fire Protection District #3 are signatories to the Tri -County Fire Mutual Aid Plan which will provide for mutual aid from Benton and Walla Walla Counties. The five fire districts in Franklin County have an agreement which provides mutual aid to each other. Those agreements are hereby incorporated into this document by reference, and are assumed to be a major factor in the coordination of response to emergencies involving fire departments/districts. The Tri - County Mutual Aid Plan is maintained by the Tri -County Fire Chief's Association as a separate document. 7. The Tri -County Mass Casualty Incident Plan is hereby incorporated into this document by reference and is assumed to be a major factor in coordination of response to emergencies involving mass casualty incidents. The Mass Casualty Incident Plan is jointly maintained by FCEM and Benton County Emergency Management and Tri -County EMS as a separate document. S. The Tri -Cities Airport Emergency Plan is also incorporated into this document by reference only and is maintained as a separate document by the airport. 9. The Franklin County Master Mutual Aid Agreement is also incorporated into this document by reference only and is maintained as a separate document by FCEM. 10. Nothing in this plan is intended to diminish the emergency preparedness responsibilities of each participating jurisdiction. Their first priority is to the needs of the citizens within its jurisdiction; and each jurisdiction maintains their right to attend to their own circumstances before committing resources to cooperative disaster response. Participation in the mutual aid agreements is entirely voluntary. Nothing in this plan is intended to diminish the emergency preparedness responsibilities of individual citizens. Circumstances during disasters may not allow immediate response to meet all the needs of the public. Every individual should be prepared and able to provide for themselves during the first three days of an emergency or disaster. A free market economy and existing distribution systems should be maintained as the primary means for continuing operations of the economic and private sector systems. 2015 - CEMP Page 8 Page 14 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Ernergena Management Plan _ Basic Plan Normal business procedures may require modification to provide essential resources and services. 11. In situations not specifically addressed in this plan, responding agencies will have to improvise and carry out their responsibilities to the best of their abilities under the circumstances, utilizing their agencies' standard operating guidelines and procedures. 12. When a disaster occurs, or one is imminent, the chief elected official of the impacted jurisdiction will direct that the Franklin County Emergency Management Emergency Coordination Center (ECC) be activated. In most cases this will be on the recommendation of the emergency management director. 13. In a major event the resources within the county will be overwhelmed and outside assistance will need to be requested. Such requests will be made through the Franklin County ECC to the Washington State Military Department, Emergency Management Division (WAEMD)/State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC). 14. There are four phases in emergency management activities. While there may be some overlap generally all activities will be considered to be part of one of the four phases. The phases are mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery. IV. CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS A. General 1. Emergency Impacts. The emergency conditions identified in the Franklin County Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (Appendix 7) could have a wide range of destructive and disruptive impacts. These include, but are not limited to: a. Injury, death and long-term health degradation to county residents. b. Damage to or destruction of residences, businesses and other private property. C. Damage to public property, utilities and infrastructure. d. Business closure, job losses and disruption of economic activity. C. Environmental degradation with resulting aesthetic, cultural, economic and health impacts. 2. Emergency Operations. If an emergency or disaster situation exceeds the resources and/or capabilities of city or county emergency services and those available through mutual aid agreements, the Chief Elected Official of the jurisdiction affected may issue a declaration of emergency. This declaration authorizes the emergency use of resources and emergency expenditures and activates the emergency plan. Upon request of the Emergency Chairperson, the Emergency Coordination Center will be activated. Elements of local government and response agencies will provide representatives to the Emergency Coordination Center to facilitate the coordination of emergency response activities under the direction of the Emergency Chairperson. 2015 - CEMP Page � Page 15 of 65 Franklin Coun Comprehensive Ener enc Mana event Plan .Basic Plan a. The responsibility for leadership and operations during emergency situations is vested in the executive heads of government. b. The FCEM Director is responsible to the executive heads of government for carrying out the emergency management program for the county and municipalities. C. Emergency Management activities in Franklin County are conducted under the universally accepted four emergency management phases of mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery. Mitigation and preparedness are constant and continuous processes. d. This plan reflects the roles and responsibilities of agencies and jurisdictions within the county for emergency management operations. e. Heads of government, non-government agencies, organizations and departments, augmented by trained reserves and volunteers, perform emergency functions as stated in this plan. f. All agencies and organizations will utilize the principles of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) and specifically the policies and procedures in the Incident Command System (ICS) for response. g. Departments will retain their identity and autonomy during disaster operations. When agencies assist each other, personnel will remain under the supervision of their own agency. They will receive mission assignments from the using agency. h. Departments not having an assigned emergency mission will carry out such duties as may be directed by the executive heads of government. i. This plan will make provisions for those actions necessary to minimize injuries and damage and expedite recovery from the effects of a disaster. Priority throughout the emergency period will be the preservation of life and protection of property. 3. Planning and Response Organizations. Franklin County Emergency Management is responsible for carrying out the program for emergency management and coordinating the disaster mitigation, preparedness, and response and recovery efforts of Franklin County, including the cities of Pasco, Connell, Kahlotus and Mesa. Franklin County Emergency Management will compile a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan that is the overarching document for each of the individual jurisdictions'/agencies detailed response plans/procedures/guides. Primary local support agencies include; a. Franklin County Sheriffs Office, Pasco Police Department and Connell Police Department. 2015 - CEMP Page 10 Page 16 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan b. Pasco Fire Department, Connell Fire Department, and Five Rural Fire Protection Districts l through 5. C. Franklin County Public Hospital District #1. d. Tri -County Hazardous Materials Response Team. e. Benton -Franklin Health District. f Benton -Franklin Chapter of the American Red Cross. g. Washington. State agencies that are key participants in planning and response for Franklin County include: (1) Washington State Patrol (2) Washington State Health Department (3) Washington State Emergency Management Division (4) Washington State Agriculture Department (5) Washington State Military Department (6) Washington State Ecology Department (7) Washington State DSHS h. Federal agencies that are participants in the Franklin County planning or which may assume significant response roles include: (1) Department of Homeland Security (2) Department of Energy (including all Hanford Site contractors) (3) Federal Emergency Management Agency (4) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (5) U. S. Coast Guard (6) U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (7) U. S. Department of Agriculture (8) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2015 - CEMP Page 11 Page 17 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Playa Basic Plan B. Emergency Management Concepts The Emergency Coordination Center. Emergency support and coordination in Franklin County will be directed from the Franklin County Emergency Coordination Center (ECC). The ECC provides work space, communications and information systems, maps, displays and decision aids to support the direction and control of emergency response activities. The ECC has the capacity to support and coordinate Single or Unified Command Operations as events occur in compliance with the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The NIMS structure utilized in the Franklin County ECC is organized by Major Management Activities. 2. Support Agreements. The response capabilities of Franklin County agencies and those from surrounding counties are integrated through several mutual aid and joint -operations agreements. The Tri -Cities Mutual Aid Plan, the Franklin County Master Mutual Aid Agreement, the Southeast Region Fire Mobilization Plan, and the Washington State Fire Services Resource Mobilization Plan provide for local and regional augmentation of firefighting capabilities. Kadlec Medical Center has been designated the Disaster Medical Coordination Center hospital for the Tri - Cities area in the DMCC plan. Law enforcement mutual aid agreements with the Benton and Walla Walla County Sheriffs, Kennewick, Richland and Prosser Police Departments, and other regional law enforcement agencies are available to provide additional support to Franklin County. Support agreements have been established with various local response entities, including the Benton -Franklin Chapter of the American Red Cross, Columbia Basin Dive Rescue, Ben Franklin Transit, and medical centers. If local resources are exhausted, Franklin County may request assistance from the State or Federal governments through the Washington State Emergency Operations Center. C. Direction and Control 1. Incident Command System (ICS) is the basis for all direction, control and coordination of emergency response and recovery efforts conducted under this plan. The authority of the Incident Commander is limited to those powers specifically granted by delegation of authority, statute, legislative authority or derived from the plan. Emergency response and supporting agencies and organizations agree to carry out their objectives in support of the incident command structure to the fullest extent possible. 2. Incident Command Agency and the designation of the incident command agency, and assumption of incident coordination, will follow statutory responsibilities when applicable. Designation of the Incident Commander is made by the legislative authority of the jurisdiction and is based on the following criteria: 2015 - CEMP Page 11 Page 18 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan a. Specific or implied authority or responsibility within the applicable jurisdiction, or as otherwise identified in this plan. b. Assumption of responsibility by the official agency. 3 Operational direction and control of emergency response and recovery activities will be conducted on -scene by an incident commander. Requests for assistance will be made through normal channels until the ECC has become operational, at which time requests for regional and state assistance and resources should be directed through the ECC. 4 Direction and Control concepts are outlined in ESF 5 — Emergency Management. In the Franklin County Emergency Coordination Center a. The Emergency Chairperson in the ECC is ultimately responsible for direction and control of the emergency management functions. b. The Emergency Chairperson is the Chief Elected Official of the jurisdiction or jurisdictions involved in the emergency. Details of the designation of the Emergency Chairperson are presented in Appendix 1, Direction and Control. The Emergency Chairperson provides direction, using the National Incident Management System (NIMS), to the response agencies through the positions of Emergency Coordination Center Staff. The ECC provides a single coordination point for all the agencies involved in the response to an emergency and also for coordination of emergency information released to the public and media. The ECC staff includes the following positions: Emergency Chairperson, Emergency Manager, Sheriff, Law Enforcement Coordinator, Legal Advisor, Public Information Officer, Benton/Franklin Health Officer, Operations Coordinator, Fire Coordinator, Public Works, Transportation Coordinator, State Liaison, Facility Liaison, and American Red Cross. Some or all of these positions may be filled, or other positions added, depending on the needs of the emergency or disaster. The EOC organization is described in Appendix 1, Direction and Control. 6. The ECC has the ability to notify the general public utilizing a number of systems which include the Emergency Alert System, the Columbia Generating Station/Department of Energy siren systems and the CodeRED mass electronic telephone notification system at the discretion of the Emergency Chairperson. D. Emergency Coordination Facilities The Franklin County Emergency Coordination Center is in the Port of Pasco Building 57,502 W. Boeing St., Pasco, Washington (N 46E 15'34", W 119E 05' 56"). It is occupied by Franklin County Emergency Management. The designated alternate ECC is located in the Franklin County Sheriff's Office in the Public Safety Building. 1015 - CEMP Page 13 Page 19 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan Each participating jurisdiction and agency designates its own location for direction of its response function. The FCEM staff can and will relocate to any of the jurisdictions party to this plan for integration into any facility they deem appropriate. E. Mitigation Activities Mitigation activities that are specific to individual Emergency Support Functions are identified in the ESFs and the mitigation procedures for individual participating agencies. 1. FCEM will prepare and maintain a Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP), coordinate with other agencies for management of specific mitigation projects, provide public information on mitigation and coordinate with Washington Emergency Management Division on mitigation issues. 2. All agencies and jurisdictions develop and implement a plan to reduce or alleviate the loss of life, property economy and the environment from natural and human caused hazards. Basic mitigation consideration includes; (1) Removal or elimination of the hazard (2) Reduce or limit the amount or size of the hazard (3) Segregate the hazard from that which is being protected. (4) Establish hazard warning and communication procedures. (5) Conduct training and education, coordinate exercises F. Preparedness Activities Preparedness activities that are specific to individual Emergency Support Functions are identified in the ESFs and the preparedness procedures for individual participating agencies. Franklin County Emergency Management has prepared this CEMP and other plans to help ensure timely and coordinated response to any emergency or disaster. Franklin County Emergency Management also maintains and regularly updates Implementing Procedures for all agencies and organizations that are charged with disaster response under this and other plans. 2. Local agencies and organizations should develop and implement procedures to carry out their responsibilities as outlined in the plan. Lines of authority should be identified and documents for the continuity of government should be protected. Individuals with responsibilities during assessment and mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery phases should be identified and aware of their emergency responsibilities. 2015 - CEMP Page= 14 Page 20 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan 3. Franklin County Emergency Management helps to coordinate the required NIMS and other training to local emergency responder agencies following guidelines issued by the Department of Homeland Security, the Washington State Military Department/Emergency Management Division and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. This training, coupled with regular drills and exercises of the pians and procedures, provides an enhanced state of readiness for the community. 4. Franklin County Emergency Management regularly participates in events which are designed to provide educational material to the public under the joint Federal Emergency Management Agency/American Red Cross Family Protection Program and FEMA/Department of Homeland Security programs. The goal of these programs are to encourage each individual and family in Franklin County to prepare for disaster by developing a family disaster plan, equipping themselves with a 72 -hour disaster supplies kit, and learning the basic first aid skills necessary for survival in a disaster. G. Response Activities Response activities that are specific to individual Emergency Support Functions are identified in the ESFs and the response procedures for individual participating agencies. Each agencies specific standard operating guides, procedures and policies are the standard by which they will respond. The following are response measures under this plan that apply to all hazards and support functions. Upon request from the Incident Commander, staff the Emergency Coordination Center and functional work centers to provide for reliable and timely communication and coordination of response activities and resources. 2. Assess conditions to determine needed actions to protect people, minimize property damage and economic loss. Identify and deploy material and personnel support to on -scene responders. 4. Identify and activate services to minimize human suffering and loss. If an emergency or disaster situation exceeds the resources and/or capabilities of city or county emergency services and those available through mutual aid agreements, the Chief Elected Official of the jurisdiction affected may issue a declaration of emergency, This authorizes the emergency use of resources and emergency expenditures, activates the emergency plan and implements state response for support. 2015 - CEMP Page 1; Page 21 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan 6. If local resources are exhausted, requests for assistance from State and/or Federal government will be initiated through the State Emergency Operations Center (EEOC) and/or the State Duty Officer. H. RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Recovery activities that are specific to individual Emergency Support Functions are identified in the ESFs. The following are recovery measures under this plan that apply to all hazards and support functions. 1. Recovery operations will be coordinated through the designated Recovery Team leader in the Emergency Coordination Center. 2. Initial recovery efforts will be directed at returning systems vital to public health and safety to operation immediately after the danger has passed. 3. The goal of long term recovery will be to return the infrastructure of the community to pre -disaster conditions. Assistance with long-term recovery is available from the Federal Emergency Management Agency through a Presidential Disaster Declaration. under Public Law 93-288. Any such long-term recovery efforts will include mitigation efforts that may eliminate the hazard or reduce the impact of a recurrence. V. RESPONSIBILITIES A. General This section gives a summary of responsibilities under the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. Details of individual agency and organizational responsibilities are found in the appropriate Emergency Support Functions of this plan, which discuss the functions to be performed in emergency and disaster situations. B. Concept of Operations -Overview The Chairperson of the Board of County Commissioners or the Mayor of any incorporated city is considered the Chief Elected Official of the jurisdiction. The Chief Elected Official (or a person designated by that Official) will report to the Emergency Coordination Center to assume direction and control of activities as the Emergency Chairperson for that jurisdiction in response to the effects of disasters County and/or city departments are assigned coordinated disaster functions according to their normal operational functions and capabilities, and are responsible to prepare procedures in order to fulfill these disaster functions. C. Agency or Department Responsibilities Franklin County Board of County Commissioners a. Proclaim local declaration of emergency as prescribed in RCW 36.40.180. 2015 - CF'MP Page 1 t Page 22 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Placa Basic Plan b. Establish emergency policies for the county during and emergency or disaster. C. Provide liaison to mayors, other county commissioners or to the Governor in emergency or disaster related matters. d. To request state assistance from either the Governor or other appropriate state agcncies/departments. e. Issue, amend, or rescind necessary orders, rules and regulation to carry out emergency management operations. 2. City Mayors and Councils a. Proclaim local declaration of emergency as prescribed in RCW 35.33.081. b. Establish emergency policies for the respective municipality during and emergency or disaster. c. Provide liaison to mayors, other county commissioners or to the Governor in emergency or disaster related matters. d. Issue, amend, or rescind necessary orders, rules and regulation to carry out emergency management operations. Franklin County Emergency Management Executive Board a. Appoint the Director of Emergency Management and establish the Franklin County Emergency Management organization. b. Promulgate the Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. C. Approve the Franklin County Emergency Management Interlocal Agreement for presentation to each of the signatory municipalities. 4. Emergency Chairperson a. Assume control of emergency operations, and with the advice and assistance of staff, determine appropriate protective actions for the citizens of the city/county. b. Directs the implementation of emergency response and recovery plans, warn and inform the public, declare an emergency if needed, and preserve the continuity of the executive branch of government. C. Issues, amends and rescinds the necessary orders, rules and regulations to carry out emergency management operations, and may if needed, request State or Federal assistance through the Washington State Emergency Operations Center. 5. Emergency Management a. Franklin County Emergency Management is responsible for carrying out the emergency management programs and coordinating the disaster mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery efforts of all areas, both incorporated and unincorporated within Franklin County. 2015 - CEMP Page 17 Page 23 of 65 Franklin County Corn rehe+uive Entergency EmergencyManagement Plan Basic Plan b. FCEM will assist in dissemination of emergency messages to the general public. C. FCEM will maintain and operate the Emergency Coordination Center for Franklin County and its incorporated municipalities. d. Upon request from the Incident Commander, FCEM will activate the ECC utilizing a phased response approach with four activation levels: (1) Phase I activation is routine operations or standby. The ECC is ready for activation at a higher level response at any given time. (2) Phase It activation is for enhanced operations (Alert Stage) where an incident could potentially grow to the point where the Incident Commander could need assistance coordinating resources. The most senior FCEM staff will call in additional FCEM staff as needed and appropriate. The ECC staff will continue to monitor and process requests for assistance from the incident. The WA State EOC will be notified and a mission number should be requested by the FCEM ECC. (3) Phase III activation if full ECC operations and all positions should be notified and staffed. The WA State EOC should be notified immediately and a mission number obtained. A number of various ESFs will be activated during this type of event. A declaration of emergency will probably be required at this stage, but ultimately is the decision of the Emergency Chairperson. National Guard assets will probably requested for support. (4) Phase IV is for catastrophic events. Most, if not all, ESFs will be involved in the response. A declaration of emergency will be completed for this event and more than likely the state will issue a declaration of emergency for federal assistance as well. State assets such as the National Guard will be requested. 6. Communications a. The Franklin County Emergency Dispatch Center will assist in dissemination of warning to local governments and the public, and provide notification and updates to emergency response agencies. b. The Franklin County Dispatch Center will coordinate and communicate with the South East COMMunications (SECOMM) center in Benton County for response resource allocations. 7. Law Enforcement a. Maintain law and order within their jurisdictions during times of emergency or disaster. This is accomplished by continuing their normal functions, which include assisting with warning and evacuation of affected areas, providing traffic and crowd control, 2015 - CAMP Page I8 Page 24 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Pian Basic Plan and protecting key public officials. Also, providing security for the Emergency Coordination Center and other key facilities. 8. Fire Departments and Fire Protection Districts a. Maintain routine firefighting and rescue services, emergency medical, hazardous material initial scene assessment, isolation, containment, monitoring and decontamination. 9. EMS/North Franklin Hospital District #1 a. Franklin County Public Hospital District #1 is responsible for emergency medical services in the northern portions of Franklin County. b. Some fire districts and city fire departments are responsible for EMS in their jurisdictions. Currently only the City of Pasco and Franklin County Fire District #3 have EMS services other than North Franklin Hospital District #l. C. There are a couple private EMS providers in Franklin County -- American Medical Response (AMR) and MedStar which respond throughout Franklin County. 10. Public Works/Engineers a. City and County Departments of Engineering and/or Public Works are a primary resource during emergency and disaster situations. b. Specifically, they will maintain roads, waterways, bridges, water systems, sewers, and treatment facilities. Provide barricading equipment, assist with rescue operations, and assist with emergency removal and disposal of debris. C. Conduct damage assessment of public facilities, provide inspection of facilities to determine structural condition, provide diking material for hazardous materials, supply fuel for operation of equipment, and coordinate construction management of private labor and equipment. 11. Assessor's Office a. Assist in times of emergency by conducting damage assessments during response and recovery by making special efforts to preserve vital records. 12. Auditor's Office a. Assist the Emergency Chairperson in the administration of disaster related budgets, provide financial record keeping capabilities and establish a system for tracking and documentation of expenses during an emergency. b. Establish a system for removal and safety of public records. 13. Washington State University Cooperative Extension Office a. During mitigation and preparedness phases, provide, in cooperation with regulatory agencies, information and education to 2015 - CEMP Page 19 Page 25 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Enrer° enc Management Plan Basic Plan the general public regarding production, diseases in animals and plants, and handling of animals. b. During the response and recovery phases, provide a copy of United States Department of Agriculture's "Damage Assessment Report" to Franklin County Emergency Management. 14. Coroner a. Responsible for emergency morgue facilities, care for the deceased, including identification, mortuary services and notification of the next of kin. Plan for and implement a plan for mass fatality/mortuary services during emergencies. 15. Health District a. Advise the Emergency Chairperson on matters relating to health and safety of the public and emergency workers. b. Coordinate medical and public health services during disaster operations, and ensure that disaster related health effects on the public and emergency workers are kept to a minimum. C. Supervise the food and water quality control program during disasters and will, if needed, manage disease control operations and immunization, and coordinate the disposal of dead animals. 16. Parks and Recreation a. Provide equipment and personnel in support of the response and recovery efforts. Provide park and recreation facilities to be used for mass care, assembly and relocation areas. Provide damage assessment reports of park and recreation facilities. 17. Tri -County Hazardous Materials Response Team a. Provide advice and assistance to the Incident Commander and/or the Emergency Chairperson in controlling and containing hazardous materials releases. b. Respond in Franklin County to the areas that are currently contracted with the Tri -County HAZMAT Team. If possible, negotiate with the responsible party and/or jurisdiction having authority for a fee based response in areas not under contract. 18. Prosecutor and City Attorneys a. Provide legal advice to the Emergency Chairperson and Emergency Coordination Center Staff in the development and execution of emergency plans, procedures and declarations of emergency. Other departments and agencies within Franklin County and its jurisdictions, although not specifically mentioned in the plan, may be asked by the Emergency Chairperson in times of emergency or disaster to provide personnel to other departments as needed, and to perform other emergency tasks as assigned. 2015 - CEMP Page 0 Page 26 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Flan Basic Plan 19. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — Walla Walla District a. Upon request by officials of the local jurisdiction and the County Emergency Management Director, the Corps of Engineers may serve as a resource provider to emergencies within Franklin County, with the authority to deploy personnel to assist under an all -hazards emergency response. b. Technical, material, and direct assistance are the forms of response the Walla Walla District of the US Army Corps of Engineers can provide to water -related disasters within the County. Technical assistance includes providing guidance on flood fight techniques and emergency construction methods; inspecting flood protection projects and dams to identify problems and recommend corrective measures; and providing hydraulic or hydrologic analysis, geotechnical evaluations, topography and stream data, maps, and historic flood or storm information. Material assistance includes issuing supplies (primarily sandbags) and loaning pumps. Direct assistance includes rescue operations, and on -the -ground flood fight operations. 20. American Red Cross a. Provide food, shelter and first aid to disaster victims and emergency workers, and will coordinate with the Salvation Army and other social agencies to provide individualized assistance to families, b. Coordinate with school districts to provide facilities for Mass Care operations, and will handle welfare inquiries from concerned family members outside of disaster area. 21. The Salvation Army a. Provide food, clothing and other supplies, and counseling and chaplaincy services as needed by disaster victims or emergency workers in coordination with the Red Cross and other relief agencies. 22. Columbia Basin Dive and Rescue a. Perform search, rescue and recovery services for water related emergencies and assist, as needed, in land search and rescue operations_ Will obtain a mission number from the Washington State Duty Officer before responding, either through Franklin County Dispatch or Franklin County Emergency Management. 23. Area Hospitals a, Provide health care and emergency medical services to disaster victims and emergency workers. b. Provide statistical information to the Emergency Coordination Center. 2015 - CEMP Page -'I Page 27 of 65 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan Jointly activate the Mass Casualty Incident Plan and Disaster Medical Coordination Center plan/procedures with the On -Scene Incident Commander. 24. Public Utility District and electric utilities a. Provide services to restore electrical power on a priority basis, repair damaged generating facilities, and remove downed electrical lines. Possibly asked for support for tree removal to clear roadways. 25. School districts a. School District will provide facilities and personnel for mass care and may be asked to provide buses for transportation support, public information officer support and possible access to school monitoring cameras. 26. Benton- Franklin Transit a. Provide buses and drivers for transportation support if needed and fill the transportation coordinator position in the ECG. 27. Benton -Franklin Humane Society a. Coordinate with Animal Control and the Red Cross to develop plans and procedures for animal response operations. 28. ARES/RACES a. Coordination of emergency communications with emergency management to augment emergency response agencies. VIII. VI. PLAN MAINTENANCE A. This Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan is required by law and is the basis for an integrated system of Emergency Management in Franklin County, in accordance with the requirements of RCW 38.52 and WAC 118. B. This plan, at a minimum, will be reviewed on a four-year cycle or in compliance with future applicable regulations. C. This plan and Franklin County Emergency Management procedures will also be reviewed after emergency exercises and actual occurrences that implement portions of this plan. D. This plan is the documentation of the planning process and as such needs to be a product of that process, and it is essential this be accomplished with the input and cooperation of all participants. E. Local agency and organization actions support the overall emergency management function in the County. The operating procedures of those agencies and organizations, when coordinated and integrated with the CEMP form the backbone of the operational concept of the Emergency Management Organization. 2015 - CEMP Page 22 Page 28 of 65 Franklin County Compreliensive Emergency Management Plan Basic Plan F. NIMS Integration 1. NIMS is a system mandated by Homeland Security Presidential Directive- s (HSPD-5) that provides a consistent, nationwide approach for Federal,. State, local, and tribal governments; the private sector; and non- governmental organizations (NGOs) to effectively and efficiently work together to prepare for, respond to, and recover from domestic incidents, regardless of cause, size, or complexity. 1 To provide for interoperability and compatibility among Federal, State, local, and tribal capabilities, the NIMS includes a core set of concepts, principles, and terminology. 3. In accordance with NIMS, Franklin County has integrated the system in all phases of its planning and operations. G. Franklin County Emergency Management 1. Maintain the record of changes for the CEMP. 2. Coordinate with local agencies in the development, review and maintenance of the ESFs that contain agency responsibilities, 3. Review the entire CEMP on a five-year cycle, with a general updates of the plan annually. 4. Coordinate the critiques and reviews of exercises and actual events to address specific functional elements of the CEMP, and make necessary and appropriate revisions. 5. Assist local agencies and organizations in the development and maintenance of their jurisdiction's specific emergency plans/procedures. 2015 - CEMP Page Page 29 of 65 Page 30 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 17, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Vehicular Parking and Storage I. REFERENCE(S): Draft Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Use of the public right-of-way for vehicle storage can become problematic for neighborhoods and commercial areas. Vehicles stored within the right of way for long periods of time can block access for emergency response, limit the access of abutting property owners/residents, impact the ability to conduct maintenance activities and in some cases decrease the value or marketability of a property. In commercial areas parking is typically limited by ordinance or is sufficiently distant from residential areas unattended vehicles over a prolonged period of time are not common. In contrast, residential street parking is largely unregulated and complaints from within residential areas are however on the rise. As an example, in January this year, Council received input from a citizen that was concerned with long term parking of vehicles on public streets. In that situation, the vehicle was licensed, not obviously disabled, was accumulating debris underneath as it had not moved for a long period of time and was owned by a person near to where the vehicle is parked. It appeared obvious the public street was being used for vehicle storage. Complaints with the Police Department and Code Enforcement were lodged. As the vehicle was on a public street, Code Enforcement did not have jurisdiction through the Pasco Municipal Code. As the vehicle was licensed and was not by definition "junk" or "abandoned, " the Police Department was not able to cite the vehicle's owner for a Page 31 of 65 traffic or code offense. An inventory of applicable PMC regulations as well as the applicable State law and Administrative Code confirm that this situation does not fall cleanly into a category for enforcement. For example: Title 9 of the PMC (Nuisances) regulates nuisances but basically limits regulating vehicles to those "abandoned, "junk" or determined to be "vehicle hulks." Title 10 of the PMC (Vehicles and Traffic) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings on public streets but not if the vehicle is less than 14,000 lbs. gross weight, is licensed and isn't a recreational vehicle (including RV's, boats, trailers...). Title 12 of the PMC (Streets and Sidewalks) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings including spillage of material on public streets, parking on swales or planting strips or otherwise interfering with normal use of the street - but not the parking (even for long periods) of licensed and maintained vehicles. Title 25 of the PMC (Zoning) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings but limits the regulations to those occurring on private property. V. DISCUSSION: Staff has researched regulations from other municipalities and concluded that the most direct way to address issues of this type is to amend the PMC to provide a restriction on the parking of vehicles on public streets for longer than a set amount of time and/or other locations. The attached draft ordinance does that and also adds a prohibition on parking across angle parking stall lines on public streets. The draft ordinance establishes 72 hours as the threshold for unauthorized extended parking and requires moving the vehicle at least 100 feet from the location it was originally posted or issued a citation. It is most likely that enforcement of this issue will be by complaint and the initial notice or "tag" upon an unauthorized vehicle will be placed by a Police Officer or a Code Enforcement Officer. The proposed ordinance establishes impoundment of the vehicle as the end result of enforcement. To prevent misuse of this proposed revision - Council should discuss the application of a civil penalty to the owner of a vehicle cited for unauthorized parking. The lack of such a penalty may make it attractive for owners to "dispose" of junk vehicles in the street - knowing that impounding the vehicle takes care of their disposal problem. Page 32 of 65 Staff would benefit from Council discussion on this issue. Page 33 of 65 CI : 1 L .Wye -013 AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, adding a new Section 10.48.015 "Parking Across Designated Parking Lines" and adding a new Section 10.52.035 "Prohibiting Extended Unauthorized Parking" to the Pasco Municipal Code WHEREAS, Title 10 of the Pasco Municipal Code regulates parking on public streets; and WHEREAS, Title 10 of the Pasco Municipal Code does not contain a provision for regulation of parking on public streets otherwise functioning and licensed vehicles for extended periods of time; and WHEREAS, Parking of vehicles for extended periods of time on public streets or other municipal property causes build - up of debris under vehicles and invites acts of vandalism or other crime; and WHEREAS, Parking of vehicles for extended periods of time and storage of other personal effects on public streets or other municipal property has adverse effects on the ability of the street or property to effectively serve its main purpose of providing a safe and efficient mode of transportation or location for public services; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That a new Section of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is added and shall read as follows: 10.48.015 PARKING ACROSS DESIGNATED LINES PROHIBITED. Parkin across cross designated parking space lines is prohibited on public streets as identified in 10.48.020. 1 17►�11•►�%9i. 12=11 7LoI.r 11 1M."Iffi" 11ol 7.11101 ,41210 ANGLE PARKING PERMITTED NAME OF STREET FROM TO S. 2nd Avenue, west side Lewis Columbia N. 2nd Avenue, west side Clark Bonneville N. 2nd Avenue, west side Yakima Shoshone S. 3rd Avenue, west side Lewis Columbia S. 4th Avenue, west side Columbia South Street S. 4th Lane "A" Street "C" Street N. 4th Avenue Clark Columbia S. 5th Avenue, west side "A" Street "B" Street N. 5th Avenue, east side Jan Bypass S. 6th Avenue Columbia, south 170 ft. N. 6th Avenue Shoshone North to alley S. 7th Lane, west side "A" Street "B" Street S. 7th Avenue Lewis Columbia N. 8th Avenue Clark Lewis 9th Avenue, east side `B" Street, north 300 ft (head -in) 9th Avenue Clark Lewis Page 34 of 65 ANGLE PARKING PERMITTED (continued) 10th Avenue, west side Nixon Sylvester (head -in) N. 11th Avenue Bonneville Shoshone N. 12th Avenue, west side Sylvester, south Irving N. 12th Avenue, west side Sylvester, north Nixon Ainsworth 11th Avenue, east 130 ft. Columbia, south side Tacoma 1 st Avenue Columbia, north side 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue Columbia 5th Avenue 7th Avenue Columbia, north side 7th Avenue, west 560 ft. Clark, south side 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue Bonneville, north side 1 st Avenue 2nd Avenue 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue (except west of 4th Avenue for 150 ft.) Bonneville, south side 14th Avenue, east 230 ft Bonneville, north side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue Bonneville, north side 14th Avenue, east 300 ft Hopkins, south side 14th Avenue, 180 ft. Hopkins, north side 14th Avenue, east 250 ft. Hassalo, north side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue Shoshone, south side 14th Avenue, east 130 ft. Shoshone, south side 15th Avenue 16th Avenue Shoshone, north side 6th Avenue, west 200 ft. Shoshone, north side 10a' Avenue, west 315 ft. Yakima, south side 10th Avenue, west 245 ft. Sylvester, north side 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Irving, south side 10th Avenue 15th Avenue Irving, south side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue (head -in) Irving, north side 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Nixon, south side 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Nixon, south side 7th Avenue, east 5th Avenue Nixon 3rd Avenue, east One-half block Margaret, north side 12th Avenue, west 200 ft. Henry, north side 14th Avenue, east One-half block Henry, north side 10th Avenue, west One-half block and east 200 ft. Court, north side 7th Avenue, west 300 ft. Section 2. That a new Section of the Pasco Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is added and shall read as follows: 10.52.035 EXTENDED UNAUTHORIZED PARKING PROHIBITED. (1) No person shall park a vehicle on any street or other municipal property for a period of time longer than seventy-two (72) consecutive hours, unless an official posted sign provides a shorter period of time, or unless otherwise provided by law. Page 35 of 65 (2) Authorized vehicles on municipal property are excluded from the provisions of this Section, as are vehicles displayin vg alid proof of payment when parked in spaces controlled by a parking pgMent device. (3) Impound: Any vehicle found to be in violation of this Section is declared to be a public nuisance, and such vehicle may be impounded if no operator is present who will immediately comply_ with this Section. (4) Notice to Owner: a) A law enforcement officer discovering an unauthorized vehicle left within a street ri hg tof- way or other municipal property shall attach to the vehicle a readily visible notification. The notification shall contain the following information: b_) The date and time the notification was attached; c) The identity of the officer; d) A statement that if the vehicle is not removed within seven two (72) hours from the time the notification is attached, the vehicle may be taken into custody and stored at the owner's expense; e) A statement that if the vehicle is not redeemed as provided in RCW 46.55.120, the vehicle may be declared an abandoned vehicle and sold according to the terms of RCW 46.55.130; f) The address and telephone number where additional information may be obtained. (5) Relocation of a vehicle for purposes of avoiding impound or citation is prohibited. Vehicles must be relocated a minimum of 100 feet for a minimum duration of 24 hours from the location where the vehicle was noticed or the citation issued. (6) Unauthorized storage of personal effects, in conjunction with use of a vehicle or not, on any public street or municipal property is prohibited. Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, at its regular meeting of 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Debra Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 36 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 4, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director Public Works SUBJECT: Downtown Sidewalk and Street Discussion - Presentation I. REFERENCE(S): PowerPoint Presentation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On January 11, 2016, Staff presented an update on the Sidewalk Repair Program. In Pasco, some sidewalks are approaching or past the century mark and are in great shape; other areas are seeing buckling due to trees, disruption caused by construction, businesses, or other causes. This is more prevalent in the downtown Pasco area where we have the highest pedestrian activity. Most of the shoved and buckling sidewalk issues are due to existing trees. The existing street trees are a major consideration in addressing uplifted sidewalks in the downtown area. The subject trees are mature and provide important aesthetic value to the downtown area. Given their size and maturity, many of the downtown trees are in close proximity to underground utilities, which complicates removal in a way that can quickly turn a small project into a large one, and disrupt surrounding businesses. Public Works coordinated with Parks and Facilities to develop a program to retain or replace trees as appropriate. Input through the City's recent outreach efforts in the downtown area supports the notion that mature trees in the downtown core are of high value to the citizenry. Page 37 of 65 The replacement plan should include a variety of trees, randomly placed, so they will not be susceptible to any diseases that may come along. The proper varieties of trees do not have a shallow root structure, will last longer in this harsh environment, and will provide a fresh look to the streetscape. Emphasis should be placed on proper pruning and shaping of the new tree at a young age to ensure a healthy tree for years to come. Prior to implementing the recommendation on trees, Staff will complete outreach with the stakeholders and the community to gather their input and to assure their understanding of the scope of the tree replacement plan. V. DISCUSSION: Staff has identified eight (8) locations where there is a need to remove a diseased tree or remove a tree that is posing a safety issue at the street level. Due to the condition of the identified trees, root pruning is not an option. Past pruning techniques have added to the decay of the trees, which has caused "heart rot," which weakens the trees significantly. The following is a list of trees proposed for removal based on the City arborist's evaluation and recommendation: Page 38 of 65 411 W. Lewis Street Has out.groiin its well and is not a healthytree. 414 W. Lewis Street Has outgrown its well and is causing damage to the surrounding area. 510 W. Lewis Street Diseased. 511 W. Lewis Street Has outgrown its well and is not structurally sound. 515 W. Lewis Street Has a large exposed root ball and is not structurally sound. 522 W. Lewis Street Diseased. 104 N. V Avenue Causing maj or damage to the surrounding area, including the roadway. 205 N. 0' Avenue Has outgrown its well and is causing damage to the surrounding area. Page 38 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 8, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: PMC Amendments for Intentional Acts I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 9.44, entitled "Street or Sidewalk Interference" lists a number of misdemeanor actions such as unlawful street or sidewalk interference, failure to disperse or obstructing traffic. The City attorney has reviewed case law in the State of Washington which indicates that intent of the party is a necessary element that must be demonstrated in order to support a conviction. Based on this understanding, it is recommended that the applicable sections in Chapter 9.44 be amended to include the clarification that intentional acts as listed are subject to criminal citation. V. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance. Page 39 of 65 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, Amending PMC Chapter 9.44 "Street or Sidewalk Interference" to add the Additional Component of Intentional Action WHEREAS, recent Court decisions have interpreted ordinances similar to those within PMC Chapter 9.44, and determining that when such action which may potentially be in violations of these ordinances, especially when involving the exercise of free speech, intent of the party must be a necessary element to support a conviction; and WHEREAS, to ensure that such ordinances are available as an effective deterrent to conduct that might obstruct the public's use of streets and sidewalks, but protecting the exercise of free speech and to provide Constitutional certainty, modification to such ordinances may be necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 9.44.010 entitled "Unlawful Street or Sidewalk Interference" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 9.44.010 UNLAWFUL STREET OR SIDEWALK INTERFERENCE. It is unlawful for any person, alone or in a group or assemblage of persons, whose standing, remaining or congregating on any public highway, street, alley or sidewalk in the City shall intentionally obstruct, interfere with or prevent the free and unobstructed and reasonable use of that public highway, street, alley or sidewalk by any other person, to fail or refuse to yield to the reasonable use of passage of any other person on that public highway, street, alley or sidewalk. A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. (Ord. 3491 Sec. 2, 2001; Prior code Sec. 10-5-48.) Section 2. That Section 9.44.020 entitled "Failing to Disperse" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 9.44.020 FAILING TO DISPERSE. It is unlawful for any person, alone or in a group or assemblage of persons, whose standing, remaining or congregating on any public highway, street, alley or sidewalk in the City shall intentionally obstruct, interfere with or prevent the free and unobstructed and reasonable use of that public highway, street, alley or sidewalk by any other person, to fail or refuse to move on, disperse or cease such obstruction or interference immediately upon being so ordered by any police officer of the City or other authorized peace officer. A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. (Ord. 3491 Sec. 2, 2001; Prior code Sec. 10-5.52.) Section 3. That Section 9.44.030 entitled "Sitting, Laying or Sleeping on Right -of - Way Prohibited" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: Page 40 of 65 9.44.030 SITTING, LAYING OR SLEEPING ON RIGHT-OF-WAY PROHIBITED. It shall be unlawful within the area of the City of Pasco bordered by the railroad tracks on the east, 14th Avenue on the west, Bonneville Street on the north and "A" Street on the south, for any person to intentionally sit, lay, or sleep on any public right-of-way except for medical emergency, in the furtherance of work or repair to the public right-of-way or of any property or building immediately adjacent thereto or in furtherance of a special permit issued by the City under some other chapter of this code. A violation of this section is a misdemeanor. (Ord. 3491 Sec. 2, 2001; Ord. 3491 Sec. 2, 2001; Ord. 2561 Sec. 1, 1985.) Section 4. That Section 9.44.050 entitled "Obstructing Traffic" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 9.44.050 OBSTRUCTING TRAFFIC. It is unlawful for any person to intentionally obstruct in any manner any sidewalk, public highway, street or alley in the City, or for the purpose of annoyance or mischief to place in any doorway or driveway, or on any sidewalk, public highway, street or alley in the City any box, baffe', ,ask or other- thin 4 --object or substance of such size or nature as to obstruct the free access thereto. Obstp aero„ *, a ffi Violation of this section is a misdemeanor. (Ord. 3491 Sec. 2, 2001.) Section 5. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage, and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this 7th day of March, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Ordinance Amending Chapter 9.44 Street or Sidewalk Interference - 2 Page 41 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 8, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Fire Station Options - Road 48 I. REFERENCE(S): Fire Station Programming, Siting and Cost Allocations prepared by TCA Architects II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: As part of the Road 80 annexation area in 2015, the City received title to the fire station at Road 48 and Octave from Fire District #3. As previously discussed, above standard fire and emergency medical response times in the Riverview Area would be benefitted by siting a City fire station at the property. The City Council provided for evaluation of this matter in the 2016 budget, to that end, staff retained the services of TCA Architects to develop programs for a minimally -staffed fire station and for an expanded station, which could include housing for fire administration staff (due to outgrowing space available at Station 81 on Oregon Avenue), and also to provide a more central location - resulting in better average response times - for command staff within the City's service area. In addition to looking at the station size/function alternatives, TCA was also tasked with looking at two land configurations: 1) using the existing (14,000 sf) parcel solely and, 2) using the existing parcel, plus the addition of the adjacent parcel to the west (currently a single-family home, which has been offered for sale to the City), for a combined 28,800 sf sized site. TCA Has completed its initial work which provides the following significant Page 42 of 65 observations: 1. Based on projected square foot needs of 9,700 for the minimum station and 11,700 for the expanded station, the existing site is not large enough to accommodate the expanded station. 2. While the existing site can accommodate the minimum station size, the construction cost to do so would be approximately $500,000 more than the cost to construct on the larger parcel, due to the need to provide underground parking to meet space needs. The existing location is established as a fire station, is located in close proximity to Court Street and Sylvester Street, and is well located to service the southwest section of the City. If the property is to be retained for the development of a future fire station, the City should begin to formulate specific plans. V. DISCUSSION: Staff requests Council's review of the material presented and discussion leading toward direction on next steps. Page 43 of 65 Awls w Lwddm IA63lYJ 84 aV08 Lff 0 x o �l Qo m� U 4 m O ' L_ 1lY•0' SIDEYAR6 a w SETBACK Awls w Lwddm IA63lYJ 84 aV08 1. _ cgl Z f r�r1 �� °_wo E�w aK�D rm—il � a � � 'Y• �'F,; t� U7r_��-, Vww U,�}C7 k-wr� m H,u; 1�.rlr,r»Y�i f= z� uaww a �zw� � �w ■_ rom t� g �xOS m O oW '»40-0 wzz2 .0 �z°GQ � w r, _0 BwoZ wz��a�y�i7�� o�o°d' Lff o �l 1. _ cgl Z f r�r1 �� °_wo E�w aK�D rm—il � a � � 'Y• �'F,; t� U7r_��-, Vww U,�}C7 k-wr� m H,u; 1�.rlr,r»Y�i f= z� uaww a �zw� � �w ■_ rom t� g �xOS m O oW '»40-0 wzz2 .0 �z°GQ � w r, _0 BwoZ wz��a�y�i7�� o�o°d' _ 4 ai L w i • � 3 I r�ul U I �°�.° • Imo I` I ' °I° � s ♦ � I o I I " TkNDS FFERa4' R6 SETBACK I sl ` SETBACK w gg 7 I Z qlllAVdjY3H3 I I I II I I I I I 9 I I I —� I o _I d D YU ~~ n pop W W z wC'3 1�-fY W �iL U ■ '� 1'. N co k zO W IT o zrN�O� x 1`■ # 1, Q Wa� �xw��.. ucz - H Z �Wy W Z Z W N O mC7 S t.7 � ary D D fl0.] C7 wp `L fi 0.D fi ©C1 �' W �yDj W W qf— gf'}L'3Q I� 0 �If: Z � C `2} [C lr W KF¢a i Z ZaCT mm _1 � a� LD r JDN.u�aav t=n44: �f/f Q�ifiK KV ii U7 i U 1 _ ]m u'a. . . . . . . . a . . u Mimi Sate.!` ./ 1 m, SIDE YARD SETBACK n 96 017011 — i tz-V I �nrrDS BUFFER L25VR SETBACK a ON[ O.Mrnd - • • ° 'ot •eye • . I I I I �I I I noavd 93 I I I II I w w CO Z O n Q O a LU 1— U) O LU z m O U o. z m dz U r 4a4� rLLii c� O. O r Y v w w aWwaS:s e, � nml qLLar k■ O zc x�oZ ,naw... w dmszM, K z r a Z 2 U �0 'cyn i'i 6 r oea.i,..u'Fci�c`3 Kul"'o�a'ci D: yrza �o`warn e7 V wvay�°d'zz w$QSa-n-�– >i�d C!� z� o� on 2S }- n �invr �2 �z w oww v o x �� 90. �� w w CO Z O n Q O a LU 1— U) O LU z m O U o. z m s4 avda w i g b0 -0 yy ]] "�irr.t•�r•rr1. r.� I sioEvARo Lil H Uj SETBACK I s4 avda w tri � v 4 s9� m z a e� m o� a F �mrz o al �az WrWY� d ¢�4dx N. -w W O W� o�ae� SWC � �Wa �Zr-aw�V� wW ZW W t9 V ®�Z� ptn� W K¢ W W by aVt�ys O¢9OwtWW pcWCn C V U V y Z S S c 0 I i g yy ]] "�irr.t•�r•rr1. r.� � Lil H Uj LU lt�■� ' m 4[ ■ wi ��-A _ G 0 k� !�{y��.t rrrw r�yir •�11 ■ htl e E I o a ���•• �• .� e eON{kNddftd � � � � I . �, ..ate• � . , .., ,a • `..� • I ^ � F i d . v a v3iChdAVIS WidO I tri � v 4 s9� m z a e� m o� a F �mrz o al �az WrWY� d ¢�4dx N. -w W O W� o�ae� SWC � �Wa �Zr-aw�V� wW ZW W t9 V ®�Z� ptn� W K¢ W W by aVt�ys O¢9OwtWW pcWCn C V U V y Z S S c 0 I i g yy ]] "�irr.t•�r•rr1. r.� � Lil H Uj LU lt�■� ' m 4[ ■ wi ��-A _ G 0 k� !�{y��.t rrrw r�yir •�11 ■ htl e E [g� S a \1/ � T" A a�chi•ec•�re Aonning Minimum Program- Existing Site City of Pasco Road 48 Fire Station January 29, 2016 Rough Order of Magnitude Master Budget Assumptions 13.50% $476,110 LAND PURCHASE $ - Not included Due dilligence work Not included Real estate commissions Not included Closing costs Not included Sell land- net cash Not included Land cost Not included BUILDING & SITE CONSTRUCTION $ 3,526,743 MISC $141,070 Temporary facilities Hazardous material removal OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Signal ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST See Roen Estimate PROJECTED SOFT COSTS AIEISpeciality Sub/Mang Fees- All Cost Estimating PrintinglAdvertisinglRembursables Geotechnical/Land Surveys EnvironmentallHazmat Survey Testing & Inspection Poor Soil Contingency PermitsfTitle City Administration Cost/Construction Management Builders Risk Insurance LEED Service Fees- PowerlGaslPhones[WaterlSanitary Commissioning Construction Contingency Legal Fees Moving Costs FurnishingslEquipment Allowance IT]Phone System Arts (based on 1% of construction cost w/o tax) Project Contingency (Management Reserve) Washington State Sales Tax TOTAL ROM PROJECT COSTS Exclusions: Toxic Soil Removal Bond Costs Not included Not included Not included $ 3,526,743 Hard bid cost w/o tax % COST 13.50% $476,110 1.00% $35,267 0.75% $26,451 0.75% $26,451 0.20% $7,053 1.00% $35,267 0.50% $17,634 2.00% $70,535 4.00% $141,070 0.75% $26,451 0.00% $0 2.00% $70,535 0.75% $26,451 8.00% $282,139 0.50% $17,634 0.50% $17,634 5.00% $176,337 1.00% $35,267 1.00% $35,267 2.00% $70,535 45.20% $1,594,088 8.60% $ 805,861 11 $ 5,926,692 If needed Assumes no certification Notes: Costs are based on 01-29-16 market conditions and have not been escatled to a future construction start date Budget based on Rough Order of Magnitude of Fire Station Costs by Roen Associates 6211 Roosevelt Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: 206-522-3830 Fax 206-522-2456 Emall: office@tce-inc.com Page 48 of 65 T A �•c hi•e.: ufg p�nnin� Minimum Program- Expanded Site City of Pasco Road 48 Fire Station January 29, 2016 Rough Order of Magnitude Master Budget Assumptions LAND PURCHASE Due dilligence work Real estate commissions Closing costs Sell land- net cash Land cost BUILDING CONSTRUCTION MISC Temporary facilities Hazardous material removal OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Signal ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST See Roen Estimate $ - Not included Not included Not included Not included Not included Not included $ 3,062,863 $ 3,062,863 PROJECTED SOFT COSTS % COST AIE/Speciality Sub/Mang Fees- All 13.50% $413,487 Cost Estimating 1.00% $30,629 Printing/Advertising/Reim bursa bles 0.75% $22,971 Geotechnical/Land Surveys 0.75% $22,971 Environmental/HazmatSurvey 0.20% $6,126 Testing & Inspection 1.00% $30,629 Poor Soil Contingency 0.50% $15,314 Permits/Title 2.00% $61,257 City Administration Cost/Construction Management 4.00% $122,515 Builders Risk Insurance 0.75% $22,971 LEED 0.00% $0 Service Fees-Power/Gas/PhoneslWater/Sanitary 2.00% $61,257 Commissioning 0.75% $22,971 Construction Contingency 8.00% $245,029 Legal Fees 0.50% $15,314 Moving Costs 0.50% $15,314 Furnishings/Equipment Allowance 5.00% $153,143 ITIPhone System 1.00% $30,629 Arts (based on 1 % of construction cost w/o tax) 1.00% $30,629 Project Contingency (Management Reserve) 2.00% $61,257 45.20% $1,384,414 Washington State Sales Tax 8.60% $ 699,864 TOTAL ROM PROJECT COSTS $ 5,147,14t Exclusions: Toxic Soil Removal Bond Costs N otes: Not included Not included Not included Hard bid cost w/o tax If needed Assumes no certification Costs are based on 01-29-16 market conditions and have not been escatfed to a future construction start date Budget based on Rough Order of Magnitude of Fire Station Costs by Roen Associates 6211 Roosevelt Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: 206-522-3830 Fax 206-522-2456 Email: office@tca-ine.com Page 49 of 65 T A ,3•_hr'n inq Maximum Program- Expanded Site City of Pasco Road 48 Fire Station January 29, 2016 Rough Order of Magnitude Master Budget Assumptions LAND PURCHASE Due diligence work Real estate commissions Closing costs Sell land- net cash Land cost BUILDING CONSTRUCTION M15C Temporary facilities Hazardous material removal OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS Traffic Signal ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST See Roen Estimate $ - Not included Not included Not included Not included Not included Not included $ 3,499,592 $ 3,499,592 PROJECTED SOFT COSTS % COST AIEISpeciality Sub/Mang Fees- All 13.50% $472,445 Cost Estimating 1.00% $34,996 Printing/Advertising/Reimbursables 0.75% $26,247 Geotechnical/Land Surveys 0.75% $26,247 Environmental/Hazmat Survey 0.20% $6,999 Testing $ Inspection 1.00% $34,996 Poor Soil Contingency 0.50% $17,498 Permits/Title 2.00% $69,992 City Administration Cost/Construction Management 4.00% $139,984 Builders Risk Insurance 0.75% $26,247 LEED 0.00% $0 Service Fees- Power/Gas/PhonesiWater/Sanitary 2.00% $69,992 Commissioning 0.75% $26,247 Construction Contingency 8.00% $279,967 Legal Fees 0.50% $17,498 Moving Costs 0.50% $17,498 Furnishings/Equipment Allowance 5.00% $174,980 IT/Phone System 1.00% $34,996 Arts {based on 1 % of construction cost w10 tax} 1,00% $34,996 Project Contingency (Management Reserve) 2.00% $69,992 45.20% $1,581,816 Washington State Sales Tax 8.60% $ 799,657 TOTAL ROM PROJECT COSTS 11 $ 5,881,064 Exclusions: Toxic Soil Removal Bond Costs Notes: Not included Not included Not included Hard bid cost w/o tax If needed Assumes no certification costs are based on 01-29-16 market conditions and have not been escatled to a future construction start date Budget based on Rough Order of Magnitude of Fire Station Costs by Roan Associates 6211 Roosevelt Way NE Seattle, WA 98115 Phone: 206-522-3830 Fax 206-522-2456 Email: office@tea-ine.eom Page 50 of 65 ROAD 48 FIRE STATION SQUARE FOOT SUMMARY City of Pasco Fire Department 1/2812016 ROOM SUMMARY 1 QUANTITY MINIMUM MINIMUM STATION STATION CONFIGURATION lONFIGURATION. PLUS ADMIN 1.000 PUBLIC AREA 120 1.001 Lobby/Waiting Area 85 1.002 Public Restroom 685 1.003 Conference Room 80 2,345 2,470 Subtotal 2.000 ADMIN AREA 480 2.001 office- Type A (Chief) 120 2.002 Office- Type B (Admin) 100 2.003 Copy Workroom 1 2.004 Admin Storage Accessible Parkin 1 Subtotal 3.000 CREW OFFICE AREA 10 3.001 Office - Type C (BC)- Suite Sleeping Room (BC) Toilet/Shower Room (BC) 3.002 Firefighter Work Area Subtotal 4.000 CREW LIVING AREA 4.001 Kitchen/Dining 4.002 Dayroom 4.003 Sleeping Room- FF 4.004 Toilet(Shower Room- FF 4.005 Exercise Room 4.006 Mop Room Subtotal 5.000 APPARATUS SUPPORT AREA 5.001 Apparatus Bay 5.002 Apparatus Bay 5.003 Bay Toilet Room 5.004 Shop 5.005 EMS Storage 5.006 Operational Storage Supplies Apparatus Equipment Custodial Supplies 5.007 Deeon/Cleaning 5.008 Turnout Gear Storage 5.009 Hose Storage Alcove 5.010 Delivery Room/Medical Gas Storage 5.011 Disaster Relief Supply Room 5.012 Apparatus Wash Alcove 5.013 Ice Machine Alcove Subtotal 6.000 SYSTEMS 6.001 Stairs 6.002 Elevator 6.003 Pole Hole 6.004 IT Room 6.005 Electrical Room 6.006 Fire Sprinkler Riser Alcove 6.007 Mechanical Room 80 110 60 300 80 470 200 750 100 100 0 1,150 180 180 120 120 85 85 300 300 685 685 475 500 435 435 600 600 255 255 500 600 80 80 2,345 2,470 2,226 2,226 480 480 60 60 120 120 100 100 225 225 120 300 40 50 25 48 18 3,812 400 175 60 75 100 32 150 120 300 40 50 25 48 18 3,812 400 175 60 75 100 32 150 892 S1 Locate on ground floor 1 office @ 200SF- small conf table 5 offices @ 1508F Coffee counter, mini refrig, microwave 1 sleeping @ 120SF 1 Toilet/Shower Capt desk + (2) FF workstations, radios, report writing Seating for 5-6 1 Seating for 8 6 recliners 5 sleeping @ 120SF 3 Toilet/Shower @ 85SF No W/D, linen service, mop sink, laundry bans, washtub 2 Bays- 53'-0" x 22"-0", 4 -fold doors, Nederman 1 Bay- 32-0" x 15' deep, lower head room Portable compressor, Adjacent wl decon Close proximity to medic bay I B racks whop shelf. (2) sets/FF, 18 sets of WL gear, no admir 02 capacity- (3) E Cylinders MRE's and bottled water Located in alcove at bay Assumes two flights as required for egress Elevator and machine room One pole drop Rack for phone and alerting S-0 required clr Assumes located off bay Subtotal NSF 7,914 9,579 Grossing Factor 1820 2203 Total Gross SF 9,734 11,782 Exterior Parking FF Parking 8 B Additional stalls to allow for shift change Admin Parking 0 6 Visitor Parking 1 2 Accessible Parkin 1 1 Total Parking Exterior 10 17 Page 51 of 65 SITE AMENITIES Solid Waste Storage/Recycling Generator Outdoor patio Page 52 of 65 Civil Site Assessment Pasco Fire Station 1208 Road 48 Utilities Water —City of Pasco • 6" main on south side of Octave & 8" main on east side of Road 48 • 1" service to fire station on Road 48 near northeast corner of property. • Will need a new fire sprinkler service line. Sewer — City of Pasco • Sewer mains on Octave and Road 48 • Lateral to property on Octave • City doesn't show fire station connected to sewer (no charge for sewer on water bill) • Likely existing septic drainfields and septic tanks will need to be removed and new service connected to existing lateral. Irrigation — Franklin County Irrigation District • 14" irrigation main on west side of Road 48, 6" main on north side of Octave, and 2" "main" along north property line (under 4' chain link fence line) • Existing fire station lot doesn't have irrigation service but does have the ability to connect because they have been paying the assessments. • Adjacent Lot has an irrigation service near the southeast corner of the lot. • Irrigation system wants to abandon the 2" line along the north property line, it only serves one property. Power — Franklin County PUD • Overhead power (single phase 120/240) runs along north property line with direct bury service to station from pole located on northwest corner of lot. • Three phase overhead lines run along east side of Road 48. Gas —Cascade Natural Gas • No gas service to site. • Closest gas lines are at the corner of Octave and Road 46. Phone — Century Link • Facility map shows lines running overhead on east side of Road 48, likely also overhead lines along north property line with aerial service to station. Cable —Charter Cable • Overhead lines along north property line with aerial service to station. HEI Project #16-006.1 1 1/21/2016 Page 53 of 65 Storm Drainage Existing • No storm water facilities on existing site o Apparatus bay building surface drains across the asphalt to the southwest corner. o North "admin" building has no gutters, drains to ground • 87% of the existing site is impervious asphalt or building, remaining area is gravel Proposed Single Lot - 10,500 sf Building & 12,200 sf Building • Assume entire lot is impervious (pervious area would be negligible), either building size. • 10 -year 24-hour design storm would generate about 1,300 cf of runoff • A 35 ft long infiltration trench (4 ft x 5 ft, 2 ft diameter perforate pipe) would be sufficient for storage and infiltration. • Site is relatively level so assume trench drain across apparatus bay driveway with catch basin at end of run. • If parking is along Octave (pull in/back out, 90 degree angle stalls, no driveway), additional trench drain may be needed along Octave with catch basin at end. • Manhole with oil/water separator prior to infiltration trench. • 6" and 8" storm drain piping for roof drains and to tie catch basin(s) to infiltration trench. Proposed Two Lots —10,500 sf Building • Assume 20,000 sf of impervious area (70% impervious) • 10 -year 24-hour design storm would generate about 1,800 cf of runoff • A 50 ft long infiltration trench (4 ft x 5 ft, 2 ft diameter perforate pipe) would be sufficient for storage and infiltration for the small building and a 60 ft long infiltration trench would be sufficient for the larger building. • Manhole with oil/water separator prior to infiltration trench. • Site is relatively level so assume trench drain across apparatus bay driveway with catch basin at end of run. • 14 -stall parking lot would need at least one catch basin, assume 2 for estimate. • 6" and 8" storm drain piping for roof drains and to tie catch basin(s) to infiltration trench. Proposed Two Lots —12,200 sf Building • Assume 25,000 sf of impervious area (88% impervious) • 10 -year 24-hour design storm would generate about 2,300 cf of runoff • A 60 ft long infiltration trench (4 ft x 5 ft, 2 ft diameter perforate pipe) would be sufficient for storage and infiltration. • Manhole with oil/water separator prior to infiltration trench. HEI Project #16-006.1 2 1/21/2016 Page 54 of 65 • Site is relatively level so assume trench drain across apparatus bay driveway with catch basin at end of run. • 21 -stall parking lot would need at least one catch basin, assume 2 for estimate. • 6" and 8" storm drain piping for roof drains and to tie catch basin(s) to infiltration trench Right of Way • Roads have no curb, gutter, or storm drainage facilities. o Runoff from roadway drains toward property, but there are no ditches. Along the fire station, the entire area between the building and the road is paved. • Site improvements will need to account for right of way runoff. It may be necessary to have a separate storm drain system for the road runoff. Least expensive would be a swale within the right of way, but that will depend on the site layout and roadway elevations. HEI Project #16-006.1 3 1/21/2016 Page 55 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 17, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Rick Terway, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Golf Course Project Funding I. REFERENCE(S): None II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Amend Golf Course expenditure budget by $60,000, funding from fund balance. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: As part of the fiscal management of Sun Willows Golf Course, $150,000 is budgeted into the General Fund to help offset cost of administration and to provide for improvements to the golf course such as new irrigation system, paved cart paths, etc. V. DISCUSSION: The income generated by the golf course is heavily dependent on the weather, which can limit the number of users because of extreme weather or temperatures. In 2015, there was a surplus of revenues. Staff suggests part of that surplus be used to aggressively clear and replace the dead and dying trees on the course. For the last several years, Sun Willows staff has replaced a number of trees. Most of the current dead and dying trees were planted during construction of the golf course in the 1970's and have reached the end of their life cycle. In addition, many of these trees were not native to this area, therefore, have a shorter life span than if they were planted in their native environment. If approved, replacement trees would be selected from species that have been proven successful in this environment. Page 56 of 65 Staff suggests amending the Sun Willows Golf Course budget by increasing expenditures $60,000, with funding from the current fund balance. Page 57 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 1, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Residential Street/Road Size Standards Report (Informational) I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City has experienced rapid growth over the past fifteen years. Until recently, much of the growth has been in residential development. While retail has caught on in the past several years, particularly in the Road 68 corridor, and industrial is seeing a resurgence, the dominate sector has been residential which has resulted in an increase of 11,160 residential units between 2000 and 2015. Within that same period, residential development has more than doubled the City's inventory of residential streets. With residential streets accounting for over 80 percent of the lane miles within the City's transportation network, their impact on sustainability is significant. Residential streets constructed over the last 15 years were built using the City's current roadway design standards with 60 feet of right-of-way adopted in the early 1950s, which provide for a generous road section. The pavement section varies between 38 and 40 feet in width. Once constructed by the developer, the City takes on the maintenance responsibility in perpetuity. Assumption of these new public assets has resulted in greater demands on limited resources for ongoing maintenance activities such as stormwater runoff, street sweeping, pavement preservation, pedestrian facilities, street lights, street trees and sidewalks. As these facilities age and require renovation, such as pavement resurfacing, costs will increase accordingly. And in a time of rapid growth when so many roads were constructed at the same time under similar conditions, we can anticipate they will all reach their end -of -cycle at approximately the same time. Page 58 of 65 Considering the above, because of rising costs, increased regulations, greater expectations from system users, and age, the fiscal sustainability of our current built environment will be more challenging in the years ahead then they have been in the past. At present, much of the residentially zoned land within the City's urban growth area has been developed and available inventory is such that recent residential projects are approaching the limits of the City's urban growth boundary. Projections are that the City will continue to experience strong growth into the foreseeable future. The major question being; In order to promote sustainability, what will development look like in the 21st century? Just as the great American cities that were developed during the 20th century look vastly different than those of the 19th century, it seems completely reasonable to expect that the development patterns that dominate American cities during the 21st century will be as dramatically different. Without major changes in how the ongoing maintenance of public infrastructure is financed it is becoming apparent to municipalities across the nation that the current pattern of development is largely unsustainable. The public will either have to pay more to maintain these amenities, or future development will have to be built in a more sustainable fashion. As municipal leaders, one of our greatest challenges and responsibilities is to recognize coming trends and act before we are forced to react. Beyond expanded corporate boundaries, over the remainder of the 21 st century, we can anticipate urban renewal projects that encompass entire neighborhoods. How new areas develop and older neighborhoods are reborn through redevelopment will significantly impact the City's ability to financially sustain public infrastructure. Development standards, particularly street width, is not only important to our perception of scale and place, like no other factor, width drives the cost to maintain much of our public infrastructure. Street widths affect how far away destinations feel; Does the other side of the street feel as if it is divided by a highway or like it is mere steps away? Width influences the character of a place; Is it cozy and intimate, wide and spacious, or bland and barren? However, the street width also has practical implications on land usage and costs associated with maintenance. Current City standards require construction of 38 feet wide roadways with 60 feet right-of-way. The wider the streets are, the less land there is available for development or redevelopment, less property put to productive use that Page 59 of 65 will generate tax revenue for the maintenance and protection of these areas, and great costs to maintain and rehabilitate. There have been number of studies completed regarding the challenges created with wide streets in residential developments which conclude that contrary to conventional thinking, wide streets contribute to the following: Reduces the area available for private development Promotes speeding Larger surface are for drainage More pavement area to sweep and to maintain Not friendly for walking and neighbors to connect While narrower streets offer the following benefits, just to name a few: Are safer Promote lower speeds Encourage walking & biking Encourage socializing Less costly to build and maintain Less land used — less land taken off tax rolls Less pavement — fewer costs associated with stormwater runoff Less heat build — better tree canopy V. DISCUSSION: As part of the 2016 budget, funding was appropriated to complete a master plan for the City's transportation system. This will be the City's first comprehensive transportation study and it is very timely. The Master Plan will: Identify missing links Develop a list of Capital Improvements that will be used for future funding, grants and justifications Develop neighborhood traffic management plans Develop street standards Identify roadway classifications Explore multi -modal and alternative transportation opportunities The discussion this evening is to alert the Council that staff is preparing to initiate the study and that evaluation and recommendations on residential street standards will necessarily be part of that effort. The Planning Commission will be engaged on the major elements of the plan. Upon completion of that process, the plan will be presented to the City Council for consideration. Staff anticipates the plan will require the better part of 2016 to develop. Page 60 of 65 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 17, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 2/22/16 FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Chapel Hill Roadway Design - Professional Services Agreement with TranTech I. REFERENCE(S): Area Map - DNR Property Chapel Hill Boulevard Road Cross Section Professional Services Agreement Summary II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: During 2016, design cost will be incurred in the amount of approximately $900,000. The cost will be initially financed by the City, to be later reimbursed through the issuance of LID Bonds for the Chapel Hill Boulevard project. LID Bonds are expected to be sold in late 2017 or early 2018, upon completion of the project. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On February 1, 2016, the City Council unanimously approved Resolution No. 3690 that declared their intent to form an LID for the purpose of improving Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, and Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard, with full roadway improvements that includes road construction to three -lane and five -lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, bike lanes and landscaping. In 2014, the City coordinated with DNR on zoning of the property and partitioning of the property into large lots in order to facilitate its sale at auction. As part of the process, the City completed, utilizing the engineering firm of TranTech Engineering, completed a 5% design effort to establish roadway alignment for Chapel Hill Boulevard and Road 76. Page 61 of 65 V. DISCUSSION: To move the LID forward, design of the intended improvements is the logical next step. Additionally, completion of design by the end of 2016 allows the opportunity to bid the improvements early the following year, allowing for the likelihood of lower unit prices. At the time they were hired to conduct the 5% effort, TranTech Engineering was selected from among the qualified engineering firms on the City roster. TranTech Engineering has an office in the City of Pasco and has successfully worked for the City in the past. Staff is recommending that TranTech Engineering continue forward to complete design of the intended improvements. Page 62 of 65 .11 ■•-• . -• 1 : •: .1 ,,rte ; _�: ■ r �• k� w-0 V. DISCUSSION: To move the LID forward, design of the intended improvements is the logical next step. Additionally, completion of design by the end of 2016 allows the opportunity to bid the improvements early the following year, allowing for the likelihood of lower unit prices. At the time they were hired to conduct the 5% effort, TranTech Engineering was selected from among the qualified engineering firms on the City roster. TranTech Engineering has an office in the City of Pasco and has successfully worked for the City in the past. Staff is recommending that TranTech Engineering continue forward to complete design of the intended improvements. Page 62 of 65 (Q w O CP CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE AMENDMENT N 89'15'45" E 2625.87'_ _ CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC LENGTH LINE BEARING DISTANCE CI 5'40'00" 537.28' 53.14' L1 S 76'37'50" E 36.41' PA,SGO 16 6 tsso' c2 9'zo'ao" 442.59 72.10' L2 S 70.57.50" E 1064.42' SEGREGATION SURVEY C3 26'40'00" 143.32' 66.70' L3 S 61'3750" E 192.19' C410'50'00" 313.65' 59.30' L4 S 61'3750" E 94.85' S 6 CS 20'40'00" 83.30' 30.05' L5 5 88'17'50" E 96.38' 6S6• C5 25'10'00" 83.32 36.60' L6 N 80'52'10" E 107.96' IS•'F - C7 20'50'00" 171.79' 62 46' L7 5 78'27'50" E 40.37' 4 50 BSq 9 o C8 35'30'00" 143.39' 88.84' LB 5 53'17'50" E 87.37' r 'z8' 1 11 C9 28'20'00" 6445' 31.87' L9 S 74'07 50 E 38.20' THIS SEGREGATION SURVEY IS TO N CID 27'30'00" 64.42' 30.92 710 N 70'22'10" E 127.55' AMEND AND REPLACE FILE"PASD L 16 `R50' S se.N•Q/F< 3864, S Cit 1'25'15" 110.97' 2.97' L11 S 81'1750" E 316.05' SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED UNDER � 4z •. /'//[[ p MggG, 3 C12 6447'11" 500.00' 565.37' L12 S 53'47'50" E 83.51' AFN. 1828912 RECORDS OF 50' f T �(VD fq Ry, NSA+ oC13 85'39'07" 550.00' 822.20' L13 S 52'54'05" E 206.16' FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. \� 82B,5j,\ MgpO B2C14 554807" 550.00' 535.66' L14 S 6656'15" E 100.00' THE NEW LOT CONFIGURATION C q,CL( C15 53'26'29" 500.00' 466.36' Lis 5 66'56'15" E 270.00' CREATES 7 LOTS INSTEAD OF 11 i0- q/f0 C16 38'57'45" 900.00' 61202' L16 S 68'38'07" E 143.05' LOTS. 7 9A C17 21'29'49" 520.00' 195.10' L17 S 44'1640" E 133.64' �100 cis 41'40'42" 540.00' 392.81' Lis N 86'23'21" E 173.44' R/W FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES C19 26'13'19" 340.00' 155.60' L19 N 78'2030" E 100.00' C20 39'53'32" 490.00' 341.16' L20 S 8729'37" E 87.36' 1"= 400 FEET 11 \\ i o JT Clq C21 02'54'18" 2865.00' 145.26' L21 S 87'29'37" E 7.61' Q 41S L22 N 24'31'45" W 1 85.64 1 0 200 400 800 0 o // \ 1 L1 6 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM LOT 1 i \ SOUTH ZONE, NA083191 N 37.86 Ac 7res I ,s BASIS OF BEARING: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES. m o I WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83/91 SOUTH ZONE DATA TRIMBLE R8/2 GPS RECEIVER. INITIAL CONTROL POINTS z / FROM FRANKLIN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT WERE ESTABLISHED FROM TIES TO THE WSRN NETWORK CONTROL POINT N0. 1511 N: 341159.34 E. 1974390.99 AN THEN CONSTRAINED TO FRANKLIN REGIONAL CONTROL LOT �' o 3 ,ham1969027,01POINT NO'S: 1511 AND 1507. CORNERS WERE DUALLY TIED TO M CONTROL POINT N0, 1507 N: 339246.30 E ESTABLISH 2 MEASUREMENTS. THE RELATIVE ACCURACY 102.72 Acres o N 89'17'14" E 1319.62 - STANDARDS WERE MET AS SPECIFIED IN WAC 332-130-080. n 2 0 E E DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCE X40' R/W FOR INGRESSh030 COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.99991342 EGRESS AND UTILITIES 1 I N 6 NN n' -N 65 +E ,� LEGEND: LOT 3 LOT 7 tio' ►�� • FOUND MONUMENT. 5 00'32'53" W o R ^ w \ a 59.50 Acres �' •� 21.47 Acres \ \\ 265.06' C, 0 CALCULATED CORNER \� R50' R50" �I L21 C18 Lis Lig O FOUND REBARS NOT ACCEPTED 1322.08' ��� 89'17'14" W 2642.59' 4" E^ 22644.16' L2a 'ice 1 N 11'17'11' !'� FOUND ROADWAY MONUMENTS R50' 40 - 40 Ig IA / SEE SHEET 3 FOR CORNER NOTES �n o R50' Imo- NI�� / SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES rm m 100' R/W FOR INGRESS, 1 T,3 50 EGRESS AND UTILITIES a �� _____S � _ _ CHAPEL HILL N j oll ° w a 2 o _ -s Bsm's9" / \ 50 �- _356,76'_ _ _ _ E 1285.87'c -92911 _ _� s .81' = 167 .93'---- _ --- LOT 4 N r� \= __ X11 \\\ o / / \ I COMMISSIONERSNGTONCERTIFICATION �zg 80' R/W FOR INGRESS. I� 38.09 Acres 6 1 I STATE OF WASHINGTON EGRESS\NO UTILITIES -I z / / I COUNTY OF THURSTON 13.11 ACRES E �16IF 7sIN, 59>•� / 1046.97' 1 " N RP I, PETER GOLDMARK, COMMISSIONER OF LANDS ACTING FOR THE DEPARTMENT o T \ COERTIFYF NANRAL RESOURCES, IN AND FOR THEHE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY THAT THE MAP ENTITLED "AMENDMENT PASCO 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY UPON WHICH CZ /3 L7 -_3-_ / /vi N \ 1 THIS CERTIFICATE IS INSCRIBED, IS PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF o 2 -- - _ y'c N 34'40'19" E RADIAL 1 1 WASHINGTON STATE LAWS, 2013 2ND SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 19, SECTION 3238 I C3 C4 C5C6 ``�� '� L 712 110,97'FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PER CHAPTER 79.11 ROW. L4 C>� / C9 IT IS ALSO NOTED THAT A DULY AUTHENTICATED COPY OF THIS MAP SHALL BE FILED _ I Lg CB / / 0>0 _ _ - - -- _ i IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE m '�? a w `�\\` i _ ORIGINAL COPY SHALL BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC ,2 III m 3 I / / oil c _ w LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WA. Q SEE SHEET 2 f o z LOT 0 FOR DETAIL 3 / / _ b 2015ES5 MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE DAY OF 30.05 Acres / o RIGOR CR -2446) 30'- �-- 30'(DNR CR -2446) 3� Q / �0 / - - - - - - - - - - - 8 R W PIPE LINE EASEMENT 50- \ ' � - - _ LIL 1315R50'.49' TO C/L PROPOSED NEW ROAD= 1330.33'---- - S 891744" W 1330.40' I / N 89'1804 E 1330.13 ARGENT ROAD 30' (DNR OR / TVN, R,29E. - (DNF CR -2446) 3Q N 89'18'23" E 132979' i6 PETER GOLDMARK COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS AUDITOR'S cERnFlcarE suRveroR's cERnFlcarE L_Ep SEGREGATION SURVEY IN SECTION 16 Pasco is FIELD CREW. LINK SEILER EDWAROS FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 2016 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS ��Ao1' re4sy TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W M. A7 M. IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE . yp �.N ,STATE OF WASHINGTON FIELD BOOK: SEI 1/06/2016 AT THE REQUEST OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES o NATURAL RESOURCES.£C19TE44.9. IN JANUARY, 2016 w DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 45158Q RYNEA L. EDWARDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER rONgt LAN�SJ LAND SURVEY SECTION-P.O. BOX 47030 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7030 (360)902-1206 X84-8.2 SHEET I OF 3 FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPUTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER v CD C) 0 m C71 CANlILEYER WY(F BIKE CAMILFYFR � � - SIOLWALY UNF IRATFIC UHC iRAf(IC UNE UNE 1 1 SINF7' 0.5' S' 11' 1' S' 0.5' 1 ROAD 76 OVERPASS SECTION xor ro scaLE z 5' S 11IAII 11! 11' 11' 11' S 5 ] a Z CHAPEL HILL BLVD 2 -WAY LEFT TURN SECTION w o - N01 )0 SCALE QOn � 3 - �yU V 5' iv1 l raAn'c11' 1 F ->Hr tnnwi-vx lnanc 12' 11 RNK 5' P Z ROAD 76 2 -WAY LEFT TURN SECTION O^ Hoi !o SCALE V) (p (n Z N �J O¢ X ¢� Q W ¢Zz wm0 J dW —7- ZLL*�F ,.vnsuIm®.E , wR .+wne w� 'nA �nrxu J h w; z 12 r Ir 1 7' �JJ Q� CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD SECTION NOT ro SCAIE U CAO DWG: EASE.OWG PnTErvo. 1/1420/4 4/4/2014 DRAWN BY: GTR �� DESIGN LiY: NA GTR 1 CHECKED 6Y: NA VSCALE OR SCALE: 1 Fiij lo ER : 1'-4' SHEET is SHE . 13 5 5 1 ROAD 76 BOULEVARD SECi1ON Is 5 5 13 xor TO s a of Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: Professional Services Agreement for Design of Extension of Chapel Hill Boulevard Consultant: TranTech Address: 12011 NE 1st Street. Suite C-305. Bellevue. WA 98005 Scope of Services: Full design of roadway extension to include three -lane and five -lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, bike lanes and landscaping. Term: Completion Date: January 31, 2017 Payments to Consultant: ® Hourly Rate: $ not to exceed $897,000 ❑ Fixed Sum of: ❑ Other: Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: ❑ $1,000,000 each occurrence; ❑ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or ❑X $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: ® $1,000,000 per claim; ❑ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or ❑ $ per claim; and $ per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Signature by: ❑ Mayor ❑X City Manager Page 65 of 65