Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016.02.01 Council Meeting PacketPage Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. (a) Pledge of Allegiance February 1, 2016 3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Council members or the public, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately. 7 - 9 (a) Approval of Minutes To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated January 19, 2016. 10-14 (b) Bills and Communications To approve 2015 claims in the total amount of $999,621.56 ($912,916.68 in Check Nos. (listing attached); $86,704.88 in Electronic Transfer Nos. (listing attached). To approve 2016 claims in the total amount of $2,163,108.74 ($989,901.02 in Check Nos. (listing attached); $573,847.56 in Electronic Transfer Nos. (listing attached); $27,537.92 in Check Nos. 48928-48952; $559,822.24 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30090516-30090980; $12,000.00 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 218-219. 15-24 (c) Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance Interlocal Agreement To approve the Interlocal Agreement with Franklin County, Connell, Mesa and Kahlotus for the purpose of administering the Washington State Homeless Housing and Assistance Act generated funds for housing programs and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement. 25-33 (d) I Annexation: Thorne Annexation (MF# ANX 2016-001) To set 7:00 pm, February 16, 2016 as the time and date for a public hearing Page 1 of 252 34-37 38-43 50-56 Regular Meeting to consider the Throne annexation petition. (e) I Final Acceptance: Powerline Road Improvements February 1, 2016 To approve Resolution No. 3682, accepting the work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc., under contract for the Powerline Road Improvements project. (f) i Final Acceptance: PWRF Treatment System Optimization, Phase 3 - Pond Area Grading To approve Resolution No. 3683, accepting the work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc., under contract for the PWRF Treatment System Optimization, Phase 3 - Pond Area Grading project. (g) I Street Vacation: A Portion of East Clark St. and North Main Ave. (MF# VAC 2015-020) To approve Resolution No. 3684, setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 7, 2016, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of East Clark Street and a portion of North Main Avenue. (h) 1 Street Vacation: Unnamed Street in Short Plat 2010-15 (MF# VAC 2015-019) To approve Resolution No. 3685, setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 7, 2016, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating the undeveloped street right-of-way adjacent to the southern boundary of Short Plat 2010-15. (RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: 5. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: This item is provided to allow citizens the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. 6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: Page 2 of 252 57-62 63-67 68-87 88- 107 108- 127 Regular Meeting February 1, 2016 (a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers 7. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO: (a) I Easement Vacation: Broadmoor Terrace, Phase I (MF# VAC 2015- 018) CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4263, an Ordinance vacating the east/west easement through Lots 18-25, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 Broadmoor Terrace and further, authorize publication by summary only. (b) I Easement Vacation: First Place (MF# VAC 2015-021) CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4264, an Ordinance vacating the sanitary sewer easement along the southern boundary of Phases 3, 5, and 7 First Place. 8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: (a) Q* Rezone: "O" (Office) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) (MF# Z 2015-005) MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4265, rezoning property located at 1804 & 1808 N 20th Ave. from "O" (Office ) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential), and further, authorize publication by summary only. (b) ® Rezone: C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) Coles Estates (MF# Z 2015-004) MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4266, an ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, rezoning Lot 6, Coles Estates from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential), and further, authorize publication by summary only. (c) ® Rezone: C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low -Density Residential) Court Street (MF# Z 2016-001) MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4267, an ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, rezoning Lots 17 through 32 Block 10, Sylvester's 2nd Addition from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential), and further, authorize publication by summary only. Page 3 of 252 Regular Meeting February 1, 2016 128 - 158 (d) QJ Special Permit: Modification of Special Permit SP05-098 Moore Mansion (MF# SP 2015-015) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3686, accepting the Planning Commission's recommendation and approving the modification of Special Permit SP05-098 for the adaptive reuse of the Moore Mansion property. 159- 177 (e) ® Special Permit: WSU Farm in an R-12 District (MF# SP 2015-018) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3687, granting a special permit for a WSU Extension Services Farm in an RS -12 (Suburban Residential) District. 178-202 (f) 0 Special Permit: Highland Park Sports Field Lighting (MF# SP 2015- 017) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3688, approving a special permit for the location of sports field lighting at Highland Park, located west of N. Wehe Avenue between E. Broadway Boulevard and E. Adelia Street, as recommended by the Planning Commission. 203-226 (g) I Preliminary Plat: Columbia Dunes (MF# PP 2015-005) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3689, a resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Columbia Dunes. 227-235 (h) i Chapel Hill Boulevard Extension - Resolution for LID MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3690, declaring the intent of the City to order the improvements of Chapel Hill Boulevard (from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, and Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard). 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 10. NEW BUSINESS: 236-240 (a) I Bid Award: Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Safety Improvements Project (RC) MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the WWTP Safety Improvements project, including all Alternates (Alternates 1 through 5), to Culbert Construction, Inc. in the amount of $115,022.41 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents. 241 -245 (b) 1 Bid Award: East Side Booster Pump Station Upgrade (BS 2.1) (RC) MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the East Side Booster Pump Station Upgrade (BS 2.1) project to Big D's Construction of Tri - Page 4 of 252 246-250 251-252 Regular Meeting February 1, 2016 Cities, Inc. in the amount of $843,044.42 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents. (c) Professional Services Agreement for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) Plan MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) Plan with Herrerra Environmental Consultants, Inc. and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. (d) I Professional Services Agreement - Park, Recreation and Forestry Plan Update MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with Studio Cascade Inc. for the Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Forestry Plan update and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. 11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 13. ADJOURNMENT. (RC) Roll Call Vote Required * Item not previously discussed Q Quasi -Judicial Matter MF# "Master File #...." REMINDERS: 1:30 p.m., Monday, February 1, TRIOS — Emergency Medical Services Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN, Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.) 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, February 3, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue — Franklin County Mosquito Control District Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.) 5:30 p.m., Thursday, February 4, P&R Classroom — Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER SAUL MARTINEZ, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.) Page 5 of 252 Regular Meeting February 1, 2016 This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 6 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager FROM: Rick Terway, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes I. REFERENCE(S): Minutes 01.19.16 January 26, 2016 Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated January 19, 2016. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 7 of 252 REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 2016 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Rebecca Francik, Mike Garrison, Robert Hoffmann, Tom Larsen, Saul Martinez and Matt Watkins. Excused: Al Yenney. Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager; Leland Kerr, City Attorney; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director and Bob Metzger, Police Chief. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Braden Dick, representing Boy Scout Troop No. 911. CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of Minutes To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated January 4, 2016. Bills and Communications To approve 2015 claims in the total amount of $1,633,222.42 ($1,629,620.92 in Check Nos. (listing attached); $3,601.50 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 808783. To approve 2016 claims in the total amount of $2,213,629.81 ($1,006,598.52 in Check Nos. (listing attached); $542,593.13 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 808738- 808782, 808784-808797; $59,945.82 in Check Nos. 48899-48927; $592,247.63 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30090038-30090515; $12,244.71 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 212-217. To approve bad debt write-off for Utility Billing, Ambulance, Cemetery, General Accounts, Miscellaneous Accounts, and Municipal Court (non- criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of $267,511.41 and, of that amount, authorize $178,714.23 be turned over for collection. Final Plat: Tierra Vida No. 2, Phase 1 (MF# FP 2015-005) To approve the final plat for Tierra Vida No. 2, Phase 1. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve the Consent Agenda as read. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: Mr. Watkins reported he and Mr. Zabell meet with State Legislators in Olympia. Mr. Hoffmann attended the BFCG Tri -Mats Policy Advisory Committee meeting. Page 1 of 2 Page 8 of 252 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 19, 2016 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: Repeal PMC Chapter 3.88 "Demands" MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4260, repealing Chapter 3.88 of the Pasco Municipal Code and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Amend PMC 8.02 Animal Control - Refusal to Redeem MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4261, amending Section 8.02.130 "Interference with Officers - Failure to Redeem - Frauds"; creating a new Section 8.02.135 "Refusal to Redeem"; and amending Section 8.02.360 "Penalty Provisions" of the Pasco Municipal Code and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Charter Cable Franchise Extension MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4262, extending the Cable Television Franchise Agreement with Charter Communications (Falcon Video Communications, L.P.) through July 31, 2016 and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried 5-1. No - Watkins. City Council Representation on Boards and Committees MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve Resolution No. 3681, confirming Mayoral appointments of Councilmembers to various Boards and Committees. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: Mr. Zabell noted the dates of the upcoming Public Forums and reported on the meeting with State Legislators in Olympia, including an update on the Road 68/DNR property and the MATRICS project. Mayor Watkins noted he and other Councilmembers will be attending the AWC Conference next week. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Council adjourned to Executive Session at 7:16 p.m. for approximately 15 minutes to discuss collective bargaining strategy and proposals with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager and the City Attorney. Mayor Watkins called the meeting back to order at 7:32 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:32 p.m. APPROVED: Debra Clark, City Clerk ATTEST: Matt Watkins, Mayor PASSED and APPROVED this 1St day of February, 2016 Page 2 of 2 Page 9 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 26, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 FROM: Rick Terway, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Bills and Communications I. REFERENCE(S): 2015 Accounts Payable 02.01.16 2016 Accounts Payable 02.01.16 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve 2015 claims in the total amount of $999,621.56 ($912,916.68 in Check Nos. (listing attached); $86,704.88 in Electronic Transfer Nos. (listing attached). To approve 2016 claims in the total amount of $2,163,108.74 ($989,901.02 in Check Nos. (listing attached); $573,847.56 in Electronic Transfer Nos. (listing attached); $27,537.92 in Check Nos. 48928-48952; $559,822.24 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30090516-30090980; $12,000.00 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 218-219. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 10 of 252 CITY OF PASCO Council Meeting of: February 1, 2016 Accounts Payable Approved The City Council City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim. Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick Terway, A&CS Director We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this 1 day of February, 2016 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment: Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen'I Bank Electronic Bank Combined Check Numbers SEE ATTACHED Total Check Amount $912,916.68 $0.00 Total Checks $ 912,916.68 Electronic Transfer Numbers SEE ATTACHED Total EFT Amount $86,704.88 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total EFTs $ 86,704.88 Grand Total $ 999,621.56 Councilmember Councilmember SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERAL FUND 462,734.70 STREET 48.37 ARTERIAL STREET 0.00 STREET OVERLAY 0.00 C.D. BLOCK GRANT 1,997.67 HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT 0.00 NSP GRANT 0.00 MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER 258.38 AMBULANCE SERVICE 49,745.21 CEMETERY 34.69 ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 492.83 GOLF COURSE 0.00 SENIOR CENTER OPERATING 125.39 MULTI -MODAL FACILITY 1,406.39 SCHOOL IMPACT FEES 0.00 RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN 0.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LODGING 0.00 LITTER ABATEMENT 0.00 REVOLVING ABATEMENT 24.50 TRAC DEVELOPMENT & OPERATING 0.00 PARKS 0.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 34,671.25 STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER 0.00 LID 0.00 GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 182,750.04 UTILITY, WATER/SEWER 261,655.20 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL 3,388.70 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS 288.24 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL 0.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT BUSINESS 0.00 MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE 0.00 FLEX 0.00 PAYROLL CLEARING 0.00 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 999,621.56 Page 11 of 252 2015 Expenses Check Numbers 207986-207988 207991-207992 207995 207998 208000-208002 208004 208007-208009 208011-208012 208014-208021 208024-208027 208029-208031 208038 208040 208042-208043 208048 208052-208054 208057-208058 208062-208063 208065-208067 208070-208071 208073 208075-208078 208080 208082 208084-208085 208087-208095 208097 208099 208103-208106 208110-208111 208113 208115-208116 208118 208120-208121 208129-208130 208132-208134 208136 208138 208140 208143 208147 208165 208169 208177 208182 208193 208201 208212 2015 Expenses EFT Numbers 808639-808748 808758-808774 808777-808786 808798-808821 808833-808835 808838-808839 808841-808844 808846-808848 808851 808871-808903 808924-808936 808942 808944-808948 808959 808965-808978 808981-808983 808989 809005-809006 Page 12 of 252 CITY OF PASCO Council Meeting of: February 1, 2016 Accounts Payable Approved The City Council City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and we are authorized to authenticate and certify to such claim. Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick Terway, A&CS Director We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this 1 day of February, 2016 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment: Check Numbers Total Check Amount Electronic Transfer Numbers Total EFT Amount Councilmember Claims Bank Payroll Bank SEE ATTACHED 48928-48952 $989,901.02 $27,537.92 SEE ATTACHED 30090516-30090980 $573,847.56 $559,822.24 Gen'I Bank Electronic Bank Combined Total Checks $ 1,017,438.94 218-219 $12,000.00 Total EFTS $ 1,145,669.80 Grand Total $ 2,163,108.74 SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERALFUND STREET ARTERIAL STREET STREET OVERLAY C.D. BLOCK GRANT HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT NSP GRANT MARTIN LUTHER KING COMMUNITY CENTER AMBULANCE SERVICE CEMETERY ATHLETIC PROGRAMS GOLF COURSE SENIOR CENTER OPERATING MULTI -MODAL FACILITY SCHOOL IMPACT FEES RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LODGING LITTER ABATEMENT REVOLVING ABATEMENT TRAC DEVELOPMENT & OPERATING PARKS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER LID GENERAL CAP PROJECT CONSTRUCTION UTILITY, WATER/SEWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT BUSINESS MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE FLEX PAYROLL CLEARING GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: Councilmember 561,160.08 36,005.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 2,033.41 6,848.03 3,997.70 3,930.20 36,745.46 2,483.14 2,157.59 0.00 244.25 0.00 0.00 100.00 41,673.00 0.00 0.00 10,341.06 0.00 111,431.57 175,524.34 9,132.82 3,197.88 0.00 0.00 166,939.95 3,842.56 965,320.20 $ 2,163,108.74 Page 13 of 252 2016 Expenses Check Numbers 207989-207990 207993-207994 207996-207997 207999 208003 208005-208006 208010 208013 208022-208023 208028 208032-208037 208039 208041 208044-208047 208049-208051 208055-208056 208059-208061 208064 208068-208069 208072 208074 208079 208081 208083 208086 208096 208098 208100-208102 208107-208109 208112 208114 208117 208119 208122-208128 208131 208135 208137 208139 208141-208142 208144-208146 208148-208164 208166-208168 208170-208176 208178-208181 208183-208192 208194-208200 208202-208211 2016 Expenses EFT Numbers 808749-808756 808775-808776 808787-808795 808822-808832 808836-808837 808840 808845 808849-808850 808852-808866 808868-808870 808904-808923 808937-808941 808943 808949-808954 808956-808958 808960-808963 808979-808980 808984-808988 808990-809004 809007-809008 809010 Page 14 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 26, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance Interlocal Agreement I. REFERENCE(S): December 23, 2015 letter from Benton Franklin Counties Department of Human Services and proposed Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance Interlocal Agreement II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve the Interlocal Agreement with Franklin County, Connell, Mesa and Kahlotus for the purpose of administering the Washington State Homeless Housing and Assistance Act generated funds for housing programs and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the Agreement. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In 2005, the State Legislature approved House Bill (HB) 2163 which authorized a $10.00 surcharge for certain recorded documents. The surcharge is to be used to develop plans and programs to reduce homelessness. RCW 36.22.179 directs 2% of the funds collected be retained by the County Auditor and 60% retained by the county where the funds were collected and used to accomplish the purposes of the local homeless housing plan/program. Of that 60% retained by the County, 6% may be used for costs related to administration of the homeless housing plan/program. The remaining funds are remitted to Washington State for deposit in the state homeless housing account. In December of 2005, the City approved the initial Interlocal Agreement for a 10 -year period with Franklin County, Connell, Mesa and Kahlotus regarding local homeless housing programs and plans. In January of 2006, City Council approved a 10 -year plan for reducing homelessness. Page 15 of 252 The 2005 Interlocal Agreement charged CAC with the responsibility of administering HB 2163 funds. In 2012, the Interlocal Agreement was amended to direct the Benton Franklin Counties Department of Human Services (BFHS) to have administrative responsibility for these same funds. V. DISCUSSION: Staff has reviewed the new Interlocal. Points of note are as follows: 1. The Agreement shall be in force for a period of 10 years. Any party, however, may terminate their membership upon written notice given at least six (6) months prior to January 1 of any year. 2. The County's 6% administrative collection may be used to compensate an independent contractor for continued development and implementation of the homeless housing plan. 3. The homeless housing plan includes such activities as providing operating subsidies or vouchers, assistance with rent or furnishings; developing affordable housing; outreach and homeless prevention services as well as temporary assistance to prevent or transition from homelessness; the collection of data and census information to assist in the development of strategies and programs to further the goal of reducing homelessness. 4. The Interlocal specifically states that the Agreement "does not provide for the acquisition, holding or disposal of property." The Agreement provides that each City may appoint two (2) representatives to the Benton Franklin Housing Continuum of Care advisory group to the Benton Franklin Counties Department of Human Services. Currently, Jeff Adams (Planner I) serves as the only City of Pasco representative. Staff recommends approval of the Agreement so that the continuity of the program and services may be maintained. This item was discussed at the January 25 Workshop meeting. Page 16 of 252 BENTON AND FRANK.LIN COUNTIES DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES December 23, 2015 Mayor Matt Watkins City of Pasco 525 North 3rd Pasco, WA 99301 Re. Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance Interlocal Agreement Dear Mayor Watkins: Inclosed please find a final revised version of the renewal of Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance (2163) Interlocal Agreement which was approved as to form by the Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney's Office on December 22, 2015. The term of the Interlocal Agreement shall be ten (10) years from the date of execution. As you may be aware, funds for the 2163 Homeless Housing Assistance agreement are from document recording fees, dependent on the local economy. For the last few years Department of Human Services has administered and dispersed these funds to community case organizations within the community to provide homeless housing services to residents of Franklin County. The renewal of the Interlocal Agreement will allow for continued services within Franklin County. During this last year new projects and service providers have come forth and the goal is to provide a wide range of comprehensive services. Please review the enclosed Interlocal document, sign and return all 2 original signature pages to the Department of Human Services, so that we may proceed with the execution of the Interlocal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, els ullivan Administrator Department of Human Services 71.02 WEST OKANOGAN PLACE, SUITE 201 + KENNEWICK, WA 99336 PHONE (509) 783-5284 + FAX (509) 783-5981 Page 17 of 252 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco City of Connell City of Mesa City of Kahlotus 525 North 3`d PO Box 1200 PO Box 146 PO Box 100 Pasco, WA 99301 Connell, WA 99326 Mesa, WA 99343 Kahlotus, WA 99335 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, AND: THE CITY OF PASCO, THE CITY OF CONNELL, THE CITY OF MESA, AND THE CITY OF KAHLOTUS; IN PROVIDING FOR LOCAL HOMELESS HOUSING AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS/PLANS This Interlocal Agreement, hereinafter referred to as "Agreement", is entered into as of the day of , 20 between Franklin County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," with its principal offices located at 1016 North 4th Avenue, Pasco Washington, 99301; the City of Pasco, a municipal corporation with its principal offices located at 525 North Third, Pasco, Washington 99301; the City of Connell, a municipal corporation with its principal offices located at 104 E Adams Street, Connell, Washington, 99326-1200; the City of Mesa, a municipal corporation with its principal offices located at 103 Franklin Street, Mesa, Washington 99343; the City of Kahlotus, a municipal corporation with its principal offices located at E 130 Weston, Kahlotus, Washington 99335; hereinafter all the aforementioned cities referred to collectively as "CITIES." This Agreement is entered into by the COUNTY under the authority of RCW 36.32.120, RCW 36.22.179, and Chapter 43.1850 RCW. This Agreement is entered into by the CITIES under authority of RCW 36.22.179 and Chapter 43.1850 RCW. This Agreement is in conformity with Chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, To carry out the purposes of this Agreement and in consideration of the benefits to be received by each party it is agreed as follows: Sec. 1. Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement shall be to provide for the collection, administration, and expenditure of RCW 36.22.179 funds (also commonly referred to as "HHAA" or "2163" funds, after the name and number of the enacting legislation) to accomplish the purposes of chapter 484, Laws of 2005, RCW 36.22.179, and Chapter 43.185C RCW in the COUNTY'S and CITIES' providing of local homeless housing programs/plans. Sec. 2. Parties: The parties to this Agreement shall be Franklin County, the City of Pasco, the City of Connell, the City of Mesa, and the City of Kahlotus. Sec. 3. Term: This Agreement shall be for ten (10) years from the date of execution unless any party elects to terminate the Agreement per the termination clause of this Agreement. Renewal of this Agreement shall be by separate written agreement of the parties. Sec. 4. The COUNTY shall: 1) By resolution approve and operate a homeless housing program/plan as authorized per Chapter 43.185C RCW. Page 18 of 252 2) File the homeless housing program/plan with the State of Washington Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development. 3) Collect all funds authorized by RCW 36.22.179. 4) By ordinance create a Homeless Housing and Assistance Fund or Account for deposit of the specified percentage of RCW 36.22.179 funds detailed in Section 4(5)(ii) of this Agreement. 5) Administer all collected RCW 36.22.179 funds in the following sequential order as follows: i) Retain two percent (2%) of all funds collected under RCW 36.22.179 as a COUNTY collection fee. ii) Deposit sixty percent (60%) of the remaining balance of collected RCW 36.22.179 funds into the Homeless Housing and Assistance Fund, six percent (6%) of which subsequently may be paid to the COUNTY general fund to satisfy its administrative costs related to the homeless housing program/plan, and the balance used by the COUNTY for programs that directly accomplish the goals of the Benton and Franklin Counties 10 Year Homeless Housing Plan and in accordance with RCW 43.185C.050, as now in effect or hereafter amended. iii) The remaining portion of the funds collected under RCW 36.22.179 funds shall be remitted to the State Treasurer for deposit in the State's homeless housing account. 6) The COUNTY may enter into a separate Professional Services Agreement with an independent contractor to assist with the continued development and management of the Franklin County homeless housing plan referenced above, and the implementation thereof; and use any or all of the six percent referenced above to pay for such services. 7) The Benton and Franklin Counties Department of Human Services is designated as the representative of the COUNTY and as the "local government" as defined in the Act for administering ESSHB 2163 and ESSHB 1359 funds retained by the COUNTY Auditor pursuant to the Act, to be used for the following purposes, within Franklin County: i) Rental and furnishings of units for the use of homeless persons. ii) Costs of developing affordable housing for homeless persons and services for formerly homeless individuals and families residing in transitional housing or permanent housing and still at risk of homelessness. iii) Operating subsidies for transitional housing or permanent housing serving formerly homeless families or individuals. iv) Services to prevent homelessness, such as emergency eviction prevention programs including temporary rental subsidies to prevent homelessness. v) Temporary services to assist persons leaving state institutions and other state programs to prevent them from becoming or remaining homeless. vi) Outreach services for homeless individuals and families. 2 Page 19 of 252 vii) Development and management of local homeless plans including homeless census data collection; identification of goals, performance measures, strategies, and costs and evaluation of progress towards established goals. viii) Rental vouchers payable to landlords for persons who are homeless or below thirty percent of the median income or in immediate danger of becoming homeless. ix) Other activities to reduce and prevent homelessness as identified for funding in the local plan. x) Other duties as required by the State of Washington and the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development such as the COUNTY'S administration of the annual Point in Time Count, submission of data and required reports, participation in a Homeless Management Information System (HMIS), and coordination of a countywide homeless housing taskforce. Sec. 5. Each City shall: 1) Be authorized to appoint two (2) persons to the Benton Franklin Housing Continuum of Care which shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Benton and Franklin Counties Department of Human Services. These seats may be filled with elected officials or designees, to be determined by the individual city. 2) This right is in return for the CITIES decision to not receive funds collected by the COUNTY under RCW 36.22.1791 for the purpose of operating their own homeless housing program as authorized by RCW 43.185C.080. The funds collected by the COUNTY under RCW 36.22.1791 instead shall be directed towards programs that accomplish the goals of the COUNTY's homeless housing program. 3) By executing this Agreement, the CITIES authorize the COUNTY to contract for services, as referenced in Section 4(6) of this Agreement. Sec. 6. Mutual Cooperation: All parties to this Agreement agree to provide mutual cooperation and make good faith efforts to assist one another in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement. Sec. 7. No Property Acquisition or Joint Financing: This Agreement does not provide for the acquisition, holding, or disposal of property other than the funds collected hereunder. Nor does this Agreement contemplate the financing of any joint or cooperative undertaking. There shall be no budget maintained for any joint or cooperative undertaking pursuant to this Agreement. Sec. 8. Termination: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, any party may terminate this Agreement effective January 1 st of any given year by giving written notice of intent to terminate by July 1 st of the preceding year (providing at least 6 months notice), with the termination to become effective no earlier than January 1 st of the following year. Such notice of termination shall be by appropriate action of the elected governing body of the terminating party and shall be provided to all parties subject to this Agreement. Sec. 9, Notice: Any formal notice or communication to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed properly given, if delivered, or if mailed postage prepaid and addressed: Page 20 of 252 To: Franklin County Attn: County Administrator 1016 North 4'h Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 To: City of Connell 104 E Adams Street P.Q. Box 1200 Connell, WA 99326-1200 To: City of Kahbtus E. 130 Weston P.O. Box 100 Kahlotus, WA 99335 To: City of Pasco 525 North Third Pasco, WA 99301 To: City of Mesa 103 Franklin Street P.O. Box 146 Mesa, WA 99343 Sec. 10. Independent Contractors: The parties and their employees or agents performing under this Agreement are not deemed to be employees, officers, or agents of the other parties to this Agreement and shall be considered independent contractors. Sec. 11. Record Keeping: All parties to this Agreement shall maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence that properly reflect all costs of any nature expended in the performance of this Agreement. Such records shall reflect financial procedures and practices, participant records, statistical records, property and materials records, and supporting documentation. These records shall be subject at all reasonable times to review and audit by the parties to this Agreement, the Office of the Washington State Auditor, and other officials so authorized by law. Sec. 12. Non -Discrimination: All parties to this Agreement certify that they are equal opportunity employers. Sec. 13. Liability: Each party to this Agreement shall assume the risk of, be liable for, and pay all damage, loss, cost and expense of its officers, officials, and employees arising out of any duty performed, or not performed, while acting in good faith within the scope of this Agreement. Sec. 14. No Third -Party Beneficiaries: The parties to this Agreement do not intend by this Agreement to assume any contractual obligations to anyone other than the parties to this Agreement. The parties do not intend that there be any third -party beneficiaries. Sec. 15. Assignment: No parties to this Agreement shall have the right to transfer or assign, in whole or in part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the other parties. Sec. 16. Amendments or Modifications: This Agreement may be amended, altered, or changed in any manner by the mutual written consent of all parties. Sec. 17. Waiver: No waiver by any party of any term or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to constitute a waiver of any other term or condition or of any subsequent breach, whether of the same or a different provision of this Agreement. 11 Page 21 of 252 Sec. 18. Severability: If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. Sec. 19. Administrator Designee for this Interlocal Cooperation Agreement: The Board of Franklin County Commissioners is designated as the administrator responsible for overseeing and administering this Agreement which provides for a joint and cooperative undertaking. Sec. 20. Filing: Copies of this Agreement shall be filed with the Franklin County Auditor and the Secretary of State after execution of this Agreement by all parties. Sec. 21. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed by facsimile and in any number of current parts and signature pages hereof with the same effect as if all parties to this Agreement had all signed the same document. All executed current parts shall be construed together, and shall, together with the text of this Agreement, constitute one and the same instrument. Sec. 22. Effective: This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by all of the parties and recording with the Franklin County Auditor. Dated this day of , 20_ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON Brad Peck Rick Miller Robert E. Koch Attest: Approved as to Form: Clerk of the Board D uty Prosecuting Attorney 5 Page 22 of 252 CITY OF PASCO Dame: Title: Attest: Approved as to Form: Title: Title: Page 23 of 252 CITY OF PASCO Name: Title: Attest: Approved as to Form: Title: Title: Page 24 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 26, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Annexation: Thorne Annexation (MF# ANX 2016-001) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Annexation Petition II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to set 7:00 pm, February 16, 2016 as the time and date for a public hearing to consider the Throne annexation petition. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The petition method of annexation is a two-step process requiring the submittal of a Notice of Intent to Commence Annexation and a formal petition. The Council considered the Thorne Annexation Notice of Intent in a public meeting on January 4, 2016. Dennis and Merele Thorne filed an annexation petition on January 15, 2016 and that petition has since been certified by the County Assessor as sufficient to proceed with annexation. Upon receipt of an annexation petition the Council is required to set a date for a public hearing to consider the petition and to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the petition. Page 25 of 252 February 16, 2016 is the first available date for a public hearing. V. DISCUSSION: Page 26 of 252 Item: Thorne Annexation Vicinity Applicant: R & D Partnership N Map File #. ANX 2016-001 CHAPEL HILL,,B'LVD SITE 1 •. •m LIM I owWOODBINIE= DR Z VALLEY VIEW PL" All in Ol 1 r - r , - 1 r .�� ARGENT R _ _ D_. _ - n PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF PASCO TO: The City Council of the City of Pasco 525 North Third Avenue Pasco, Washington 99301 The undersigned, being the owners of not less than sixty percent (60%), in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, lying contiguous to the City of Pasco, Washington, do hereby petition that such territory be annexed to and made a part of the City of Pasco under the provisions of RCW 35.14.120, et seq., and any amendments thereto, of the State of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within Franklin County, Washington, and is described in Exhibit "1", attached hereto. WHEREFORE, the undersigned respectively petition the Honorable City Council and ask: (a) That appropriate action be taken to entertain this petition, fixing a date for a public hearing, causing notice to be published and posted, specifying the time and place of such hearing, and inviting all persons interested to appear and voice approval or disapproval of such annexation; and, (b) That following such hearing the City Council determine by Ordinance that such annexation shall be effective; and that property so annexed shall become a part of the City of Pasco, Washington, subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter enforced. The Petitioners subscribing hereto agree that all property within the territory hereby sought to be annexed shall not assume any existing indebtedness and will not require simultaneous adoption of zoning regulations in accordance with the City Council's acceptance of the Notice of Intention to Commence Annexation as indicated in Resolution No. 3677 as recorded in the January 4, 2016 Council minutes of the City of Pasco, Washington. This Petition is accompanied by and has attached hereto as Exhibit "2" a diagram which outlines the boundaries of the property sought to be annexed. Page 29 of 252 WARNING: Every person who signs this petition with any other than his/her name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these petitions, or signs a petition seeking an election when he/she is not a legal voter, or signs a petition when he/she is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein any false statement, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. PRAYER OF PETITION: (1) Annexation of area described and depicted in Exhibits "1" and "2", without (2) assumption of indebtedness of the City of Pasco and without (3) simultaneous adoption of the City of Pasco Zoning Regulations. DATE OWNER'S SIGNATURE PRINT NAME/ADDRESS SIGNED 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. s. 9. 10. 11. 12. 2 ...................... ........... ........ ._._.__-.................. ._............................. .................... .... ....... ....._ Page 30 of 252 Affidavit of Signature for Annexation Petitions for the City of Pasco, Washington Under the penalty of perjury, I declare under oath, that I am authorized to sign deeds and encumbrances on behalf of R & D Partnership and I am further authorized to sign annexation petitions on behalf of R & D Partnership, for the purpose of causing Franklin County Parcel # 117641017 (3p 1)7 Road 68) to be annexed to the City of Pasco. Date State of W0'!J11n1kn ) ): ss. County of F1�''GtWUlh ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Pw-V'la &0115 ,f i -the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the PayfiYIP-yS of R & D Partnership to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. Given under my hand and official seal this 15 day of � 1+1.K'gV , PUP D&Ai NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PU LICA� in�n"" and for the State of Washington State of Wae�hingto\ Residing at: ! [/f'� Ian 4,1) 4 ANGELA R. PITMAN My Commission Expires: URA&Sf ZS ? Y MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 08/25/2019 Page 31 of 252 EXHIBIT #I Annexation Legal Beginning at point on the west right-of-way line of Road 68, said point being the intersection of the north line of Lot 1, Valley View Addition; Thence easterly along the easterly projection of the north line of said Lot 1 to the east right-of-way line of Road 68; Thence continuing easterly along the easterly projection of said Lot 1 to the intersection with the west right-of-way line of Aintree Lane; Thence southerly along said right -of --way line and the southerly projection thereof to the intersection with the north right-of-way line of the Franklin County Irrigation District Canal; Thence westerly along the north right-of-way line of said canal right-of-way to the intersection with the east right-of-way line of Road 68; Thence westerly along a line that intersects with the southeast corner of Lot 10, Valley View Addition, said southeast corner also being a point on the west right-of-way line of Road 68; Thence northerly along the west right-of-way line of Road 68 to the point of beginning. Page 32 of 252 EXHIBIT # 2 Thorne AnnexationN CHAPEL HULL BLVD W � r Z J W ' W I Z. Q ("Ity Limits i LAJ I W40DBINE DR ' 7VVA7LLEY7VIEWpL 4`���4X'o DRIB o � LO c� o o i City Lir�'lits 03 Li U a CL o n O ARGENT RD Page 33 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director Public Works SUBJECT: Final Acceptance: Powerline Road Improvements I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Resolution December 28, 2015 Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. accepting the work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc., under contract for the Powerline Road Improvements project. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Traffic Impact Fees - $613,424 Street Overlay Fund - $424,000 Private Contributions - $118,500 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On May 13, 2013, Council awarded the Powerline Road Improvements project to Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc. for $917.622.60. V. DISCUSSION: Powerline Road is a principal arterial roadway serving current developments to the south, as well as future development to the north, and a portion of a west corridor. The newly constructed road segment has already proven to be a relief to traffic congestion on Road 68 by providing an alternate route to the I-182. This project completed a half section of roadway, with the remainder to be constructed as part of future development to the north. Page 34 of 252 The final project construction contract totaled $1,155,924, an overage of $238,301.40 (approximately 26%). The overage was anticipated as, at the time of bid, the City was still negotiating with the Franklin County Irrigation District (FCID) on the replacement of a then -existing substandard thin-walled steel irrigation pipeline. Agreement on a replacement pipe was reached subsequent to award of the project. Design was then completed and unit bid prices for the necessary work were negotiated with the general contractor. Because of the time it took to reach agreement with FCID on replacement of their pipeline, the project was unavoidably delayed and resulted in additional costs for the contractor. The aforementioned delay caused by protracted negotiations with FCID pushed the project into a critical time in the agricultural growing season. This led to an agreement with agricultural property owners to the north to delay this project longer to avoid potential significant economic damages associated with crop interruption. The unit bid prices for replacement of the FCID line were consistent with expectations. The project was bid in a very favorable bidding climate, and overall cost for the project, including change orders, was less than originally estimated. Based on recently bid unit prices, the strategy to go forward with bidding the project in advance of finalizing the agreement with FCID saved money over bidding the project later in 2015 or in early 2016. The work is now complete and meets project specifications. Staff recommends City Council's acceptance of this work. Page 35 of 252 Nooti PROJECT LOCATION e CffY OF POWERLINE WOAD VICINOTY PASCO IMPROVEMENTS MAP CITY LIMITS RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY BIG D'S CONSTRUCTION OF TRI -CITIES, INC., UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE POWERLINE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT. WHEREAS, the work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc., under contract for the Powerline Road Improvements project has been examined by Engineering and has been found to be in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings, and WHEREAS, it is Engineering's recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the contractor's work and the project as complete; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, that the City Council concurs with Engineering's recommendation and thereby accepts the work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc., under contract for the Powerline Road Improvements project, as being completed in apparent conformance with the project specifications and drawings, and Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington State Department of Revenue of this acceptance, and Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction of same and verification thereof by the Public Works Director and Finance Manager. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1 st day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr City Attorney Page 37 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council December 29, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director Public Works SUBJECT: Final Acceptance: PWRF Treatment System Optimization, Phase 3 - Pond Area Grading I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. accepting the work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc., under contract for the PWRF Treatment System Optimization, Phase 3 - Pond Area Grading project. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Bond Proceeds 2013 T - $487,000 Utility Fund (PWRF) - $150,463 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On March 17, 2014, Council awarded the PWRF Treatment System Optimization, Phase 3 -Pond Area Grading project to Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc. for $423,748.80. V. DISCUSSION: The project involved the construction of two new industrial wastewater storage ponds for the Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF) that consisted of approximately 28,000 cubic yards of excavation, 11,000 cubic yards of compacted fill, and haul -to -spoil of approximately 18,000 cubic yards of native material. One storage pond was lined with approximately 290,000 square feet of 60 -mil HDPE geotextile liner. The work also included compaction of existing side slopes, installation of approximately 105 feet of 24 -inch diameter HDPE buried piping, and 120 feet of 8 -inch diameter PVC Page 38 of 252 forcemain. The final project construction contract totaled $637,462.22, an overage of $213,713.42, approximately 34%. The overage was due to the City modifying the scope of the work by including the purchase and installation of a PVC liner for the 8 MG pond and the 5 MG equalization pond. Initially, anticipating higher bids, it was elected to omit the lining of the 8 MG pond. In addition, the design was not complete at the time of the bid. During the Pond Grading Project, the existing equalization pond liner reached the end of its life span and suffered a catastrophic failure which needed to be re -built as an emergency. Since the contractor was already mobilized on-site, it was logical and cost efficient to have the contractor complete the emergency work which consisted of a repair and installation of a new liner. The timing of the additional work through a change order was beneficial to the City, as the cost was much lower than if the repair and installation were bid as a separate project. Although there was overage in this specific project, overall, there was a substantial cost savings. The City performed the dirt and prep work. The cost of the liner for the equalization pond was $58,590. The complete cost for the 8 MG pond was $216,054. And the complete cost for the 30 MG pond was $362,816. The work is now complete and meets project specifications. Staff recommends City Council's acceptance of this work. Page 39 of 252 PWRF Optimization, Phases 1 & 2. Project #C7 -SR -1A-12-01 _SITE VICINITY MAP v cQ m 0 0 N Ul N RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY BIG D'S CONSTRUCTION OF TRI -CITIES, INC., UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE PWRF TREATMENT SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION, PHASE 3 — POND AREA GRADING PROJECT. WHEREAS, the work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc., under contract for the PWRF Treatment System Optimization, Phase 3—Pond Area Grading project has been examined by Engineering and has been found to be in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings, and WHEREAS, it is Engineering's recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the contractor's work and the project as complete; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, that the City Council concurs with Engineering's recommendation and thereby accepts the work performed by Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc., under contract for the PWRF Treatment System Optimization, Phase 3—Pond Area Grading project, as being completed in apparent conformance with the project specifications and drawings, and Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington State Department of Revenue of this acceptance, and Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction of same and verification thereof by the Public Works Director and Finance Manager. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1St day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr City Attorney Page 43 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director, Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Street Vacation: A Portion of East Clark St. and North Main Ave. (MF# VAC 2015-020) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Vacation Petition IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , a resolution setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 7, 2016, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of East Clark Street and a portion of North Main Avenue. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The owner of 1220 East Clark Street has petition for the vacation of the excess East Clark Street and North Main Avenue right-of-way adjacent to Block 119 Pasco Land Company's First Addition and Longs First Addition. The petition requires the City Council to fix a public hearing to consider the vacation request. The earliest regular Council meeting for a public hearing, which provides the statutory 20 -day hearing notice, is March 7, 2016. V. DISCUSSION: Page 44 of 252 Overvie Item: Street Vacation - Ptn. of Clark/Mai w Map2015-020 n Applicant: Baber Mohammad N File #: VAC - N. 9 , 1 v o `. K, - � ALVINA ST LU O Q Z T { SITE OA �i x ^ �V _ � '.":✓ � � 3. k, �'�� � � � �' \, �'� . �y� a �yj!'� � � '� / CD ^ a Ul Gp -7z- G Vicinity Item: Street Vacation - Ptn. of Clark/Main Map Applicant: Baber Mohammad N File #. VAC 2015-020 r h Y 7Z SITES v � � N � Ul RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION SETTING 7:00 PM, MONDAY, MARCH 7, 2016 AS THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER VACATING A PORTION OF EAST CLARK STREET AND NORTH MAIN AVENUE. WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate easements; and WHEREAS, R.C.W. 35.79 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That a public hearing to consider vacating the south 10 feet of E Clark Street between Oregon Avenue and North main Avenue and the east 10 feet of north main Avenue between and Road 45, will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on March 7, 2016. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1St day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr City Attorney Page 47 of 252 Exhibit Item' Street Vacation - Ptn. of Applicant: Baber Mohammad #� File #: VAC 2015-020 Clark/Main N CITY OF PASCO STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION FEE $200 MASTER FILE # .V,'\ C Z � _? - L z C, DATE SUBMITTED:i 7_ . i .. , I, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the following described street/alley rights-of-way: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNED fLega� Description) Print Name:' t�rrc�1 �~ r Sign Name: Address: ^° 1„r f 143 Phone # Date Print Name: Sign Name: Date Print Name: Sign Name: Date Print Name: Sign Name: Date Print Name: Sign Name: Date 421-7- C, L ry R �C Page 49 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Street Vacation: Unnamed Street in Short Plat 2010-15 (MF# VAC 2015-019) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Vacation Petition II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , a resolution setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, March 7, 2016, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating the undeveloped street right-of-way adjacent to the southern boundary of Short Plat 2010-15. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Steve Hanson, the owner of the three lots within Short Plat 2010-15 has petition for the vacation of the undeveloped street right-of-way along the southern boundary of said Short Plat. The petition requires the City Council to fix a public hearing to consider the vacation request. The earliest regular Council meeting for a public hearing, which provides the statutory 20 -day hearing notice, is March 7, 2016. V. DISCUSSION: Page 50 of 252 Short Plat 2010-15 was annexed to the City in 2015 as part of the Road 80 Annexation Area. As the result of annexations the City often inherits odd fragment developments along with substandard street right-of-way. This is the case with Short Plat 2010-15. The County permitted this short plat to develop with a combination of access easements and a partial right-of-way. The right-of-way was never named, never developed and serves only as a private driveway. The right-of-way terminates in the Livingston Elementary School playfield making it highly unlikely it will ever extend beyond the short plat. The right-of-way is of little public utility and as a result the property owner is requesting it be vacated. Page 51 of 252 Vicinity Item: Vacating Street in Short Plat 20 10-1 Applicant: Steven Hanson N- Map File #: VAC 2015-019 i 1 :1 - —�' ` JL a Y SKF i _.e_ y r . .. rip" • . 30' 649.8' SITE n r Cn t RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION SETTING 7:00 PM, MONDAY, MARCH 7, 2016 AS THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATING THE UNDEVELOPED STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AJACENT TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF SHORT PLAT 2010-15. WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate streets; and WHEREAS, R.C.W. 35.79 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That a public hearing to consider the vacating the unnamed and undeveloped street right-of-way adjacent to the southern boundary of Short Plat 2010-15, will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on March 7, 2016. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1 sr day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr City Attorney Page 54 of 252 Exhibit Item' Vacating Street in Short P Applicant: Steven Hanson #1 File #: VAC 2015-019 30E77\\\7777777777:ZL I-- 649.8' SITE lat 20 10-1 r Cn 1 CITY OF PASCO FEE $200 t STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION MASTER FILE # LA L �U ► , _Okt DATE SUBMITTED: LZ -7 -1 S I, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the following described street/alley rights-of-way: .30' _\Ar,lb6- - 2- u- �A� i�� t2�.� T�}= c2,r r T APPLICANT: Print Name: r' (,jyV Sign Name: •' �e - `� Address:. Phone # -fl ` _ Date/'.?l5- Print Name: Sign Name: Date Print Name: Sign Name: Date Print Name: Sign Name: Date Print Name: Sign Name: Date PRPERTY OWNED (Legal Description) "I'/! i l fi 4_� Page 56 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 26, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Easement Vacation: Broadmoor Terrace, Phase 1 (MF# VAC 2015-018) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Proposed Vacation Ordinance IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , an Ordinance vacating the east/west easement through Lots 18-25, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 Broadmoor Terrace and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The developers of Broadmoor Terrace petitioned for the vacation of the old easement that now runs through Lots 18-25, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 of Broadmoor Terrace. As previously recommended, the City Council set February 1, 2016 as the date to consider the proposed vacation. V. DISCUSSION: Page 57 of 252 Broadmoor Terrace is a replat of the original Broadmoor Park No. 1 subdivision. Broadmoor Park No. 1 was platted in 1967 and contained a 10 -foot utility easement along its southern boundary. When a portion of Broadmoor Park No. 1 was replatted as Broadmoor Terrace (12/9/15) this 10 -foot easement carried over to the new plat. The easement was not identified by the surveyor in time to have it vacated prior to the recording of Broadmoor Terrace Phase 1. Although the easement provides no obstacle for the placement of homes on lots it could cause difficulties for the placement of storage sheds in rear yards. The easement has never been used by the utility companies and contains no utilities. The development of the Broadmoor Terrace subdivision with new easements and streets has made the utility easement in question obsolete. Page 58 of 252 Vicinity Item: Broadmoor Terrace Easement Vac. Applicant: Big Creek Land Co. LLC N Map File #: VAC 2015-018 WHEN RECORDED PLEASE RETURN TO: City of Pasco Attn: City Planner 525 North 3' Pasco, WA 99301 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE EAST WEST EASEMENT THROUGH LOTS 18-25, BLOCK 1 AND LOT 2, BLOCK 2 BROADMOOR TERRACE. WHEREAS, a qualified petition has been submitted to the City Council of the City of Pasco requesting vacation of a certain easement within the City of Pasco; and WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate easements; and WHEREAS, all steps and procedures required by law to vacate said easement have been duly taken and performed; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the east/west alley through the northern quarter of Lots 18-25, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 Broadmoor Terrace, as depicted in Exhibit "1" be and the same is hereby vacated. Section 2. That a certified copy of this ordinance be recorded by the City Clerk of the City of Pasco in and with the office of the Auditor of Franklin County, Washington. Section 3. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, this 1st day of February 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney 1 Page 61 of 252 Exhibit Item' Broadmoor Terrace Easement Vac. Applicant: Big Creek Land Co. LLC x #� File #: VAC 2015-018 SITE AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 26, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Easement Vacation: First Place (MF# VAC 2015-021) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Proposed Vacation Ordinance IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , an Ordinance vacating the sanitary sewer easement along the southern boundary of Phases 3, 5, and 7 First Place. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City Council initiated the vacation process on this easement by setting February 1, 2016 as the date for a public hearing to consider the matter. V. DISCUSSION: In 2004 the City installed a major sewer trunk line extending north from Argent Road to Burden Boulevard through farm fields that had not yet been developed. A sanitary sewer easement was established for the benefit of the sewer line. Those fields are now developed with the First Place subdivision and the Linda Loviisa subdivision. The sewer line through Linda Loviisa falls conveniently under Madison Avenue. However, Page 63 of 252 a portion of the trunk line within First Place could not be accommodated within a street and as a result there is now a sewer easement through a number of lots. One lot has been rendered unbuildable due to the easement. As First Place was being built the developer relocated the trunk line along the southern boundary of the plat to Tamarisk Drive. The sewer line in the easement has been disconnected from the system and abandoned. The easement is no longer needed for the abandoned sewer line. There are no other utilities within the easement. Page 64 of 252 Item: First Place Sewer Easement Vacatio Overview Applicant: City of Pasco Q Map File VAC 2015-021 I - I 711J.1'--' 0 a Y III Lump RIO i;�tj f ■ Y r �c A, 1{1•Y � �� �J 6j P�[yyF;•��J al �� �r; .rte � + I, - _ �� • �II -- .., '3.ti--�. �e•� Y.+�.. s.w xr - r �! hut`3"�� • •, ' ■� '•i:1i. ., • . /A-�.- :.T 4.-. i Vicinity Item: First Place Sewer Easement Vacatio Applicant: City of Pasco N Map File #: VAC 2015-021 Al 0 LLi 0 1C) 20' 0 x,263: ARGENT RD WHEN RECORDED PLEASE RETURN TO: City of Pasco Attn: City Planner 525 North 3ra Pasco, WA 99301 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF PHASES 3, 5, AND 7 FIRST PLACE. WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate easements; and WHEREAS, all steps and procedures required by law to vacate said easement have been duly taken and performed; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the 20 -foot sanitary sewer easement through Lots 1-12 First Place Phase 3, Lot 1, First Place Phase 5 and Lots 13 and 32 First Place Phase 7, as depicted in Exhibit "1" be and the same is hereby vacated. Section 2. That a certified copy of this ordinance be recorded by the City Clerk of the City of Pasco in and with the office of the Auditor of Franklin County, Washington. Section 3. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, this 1St day of February 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 67 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Rezone: "O" (Office) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) (MF# Z 2015-005) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Ordinance Report to Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 12/17/2015 and 1/21/2016 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , rezoning property located at 1804 & 1808 N 20th Ave. from "O" (Office ) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential), and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On December 17, 2015 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend rezoning the property at 1804 & 1808 N 20th Ave. from "O" to R-3. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to recommend a change in zoning for the property in question. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. V. DISCUSSION: Page 68 of 252 Approximately sixteen years ago two parcels fronting 20th Avenue north of Court Street were rezoned from R-3 to "Office," creating a nonconformity. Applicant wishes to rezone the site from "O" Office back to R-3 (Medium Density Residential). The sites contain two duplexes built over 50 years ago. Page 69 of 252 Vicinity Item: Rezone "O° to R-3 Map Applicant Ruben & Carmen Escalera File #: Z 2015-005 mm 1 777111 � PEARL STS, I 'ist l ' Ir _ C SAC'ATE,-;ST- T h _ n a d jz mm 1 777111 � PEARL STS, I 'ist l i G = I —till _ C SAC'ATE,-;ST- T i G = I —till ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1804 & 1808 N 20th AVENUE FROM "O" (OFFICE) TO R-3 (MEDIUM -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL). WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification has been received and an open record hearing having been conducted by the Pasco Planning Commission upon such petition; and, WHEREAS, that the effect of the requested change in zoning classification shall not be materially detrimental to the immediate vicinity; and, WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner, that: (A) the requested change for the zoning classification is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan; (B) the requested change in zoning classification is consistent with or promotes the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan serving the general public interest in the community; and (C) there has been a change in the neighborhood or community needs or circumstances warranting the requested change of the zoning classification; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from "O" (Office) to R-3 (Medium -Density Residential) for the real property as shown in the Exhibit "1" attached hereto and described as follows: Lots 13 & 14, Block 3 Sprouse Addition together with vacated alley Section 2. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1 st day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 71 of 252 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: Z 2015-005 APPLICANT: Ruben & Maria Escalera HEARING DATE: 12/17/2015 3612 W. Agate Street ACTION DATE: 1/21/2016 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: REZONE: Rezone from "O" (Office) to R-3 (Medium -Density Residential) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lots 13 8v 14, Block 3 Sprouse Addition together with vacated alley General Location: 1804 8s 1808 N 20th Ave. Property Size: The site is approximately 18,900 square feet or 0.43 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from 20th Avenue. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal sewer and water lines currently serve the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is comprised of two parcels currently zoned Office ("O") and contain two duplexes. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: "O" - Commercial Office SOUTH: C-1 - Veterinary Clinic EAST: R-1 - Single -Family Residences WEST: R-3 - Multi -Family Residences 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The property is in an area of transition between residential and commercial land use designations. In transition areas properties can be zoned to match either of the identified land uses. Plan Policy H -1-A encourages the location of medium and high density housing near arterial streets. Policy H-1-13 suggests medium and high density housing should be located to avoid the need for access through lower density neighborhoods. Goal H-3 encourages the preservation of the existing housing stock for current and future residents. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. 1 Page 72 of 252 ANALYSIS The property owner of 1804 & 1808 N. 20th Avenue, Ruben Escalera, has applied to change the zoning classification of two parcels fronting 201h Avenue north of Court Street from "O" Office to R-3 Medium Density. The "O" Office zoned site(s) contain a total of two duplexes which are considered non- conforming with respect to permitted uses allowed in the Office zone. The current (Office) zoning classification was established in 1999 (16 years ago); 36 years after the site was developed with duplexes. Prior to 1999 the R-3 zoning classification was assigned to the site together with much of the immediate vicinity on the west side of 201h Avenue. The "O" Office zoning district is designed to allow areas in the community for development of professional and administrative offices and certain complementary uses. Office zones are commonly used to create a less intense land use buffer between commercial and residential land uses. Because the subject site(s) front 201h Avenue they are not functioning to buffer between commercial businesses and residences. Application of Office zoning to the subject parcels has created some difficult circumstances for the owner. The fact that duplex use of the property is considered non -conforming is problematic for financing, refinancing and obtaining insurance. When property owners seek to refinance a property or when a prospective buyer seeks a bank loan to purchase property, the Planning Department is routinely contacted by prospective lenders such as banks. Bank agents inquire about the property's zoning and whether or not the current use of the property may be re-established in the event of severe damage. Pursuant to the non -conforming uses section of the Zoning Code (PMC Chapter 25.72) in the event a non -conforming is be damaged to the extent that repair costs exceed 50% of the assessed value of the use may not be re-established. Banks often refuse to issue loans for unsecured investments such as nonconformities. Assigning the multi -family "R-3" zone to this property would remove any doubt about non -conformities by aligning the zoning with the current use of the property. It is a common urban planning practice to assign higher -density residential zones to transitional areas where they serve as buffers between higher and lesser intense land uses. The site is located west of 201h Avenue, which is a busy arterial road, and east of a larger suburban single-family residential neighborhood. The proposed R-3 zone will effectively buffer traffic impacts generated by 201h Avenue, transitioning to the single-family neighborhood to the west. 2 Page 73 of 252 The vicinity generally functions as a gateway into Pasco. Bolstering site development in gateway areas has an enhanced visual effect on the economic state of a community. Supporting site development and property maintenance on land in gateway areas is in the best interest of Pasco's economic development. Concern is often expressed about impacts to lower density property values when nearby properties are being considered for higher density zoning. Past searches of the Franklin County Auditor's records in areas of the community where multi -family development is located adjacent to lower density development have indicated there is no diminution in the value of the surrounding single-family homes. Studies by the Urban Land Institute (Higher - Density Development Myth and Fact, 2005, Urban Land Institute) confirm this fact. Even so neighbors are often concerned about the impact of higher density development upon the character of the surrounding neighborhood. The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC. 25.88.030. The criteria are listed below as follows: 1. The date the existing zone became effective: The current (Office) zoning classification was established in 1999 (16 years ago); 36 years after the site was developed with duplexes. Prior to 1999 the R-3 zoning classification was assigned to the site together with much of the immediate vicinity. Remnants of the original R-3 remain applied to parcels to the north and to the west which contain residential apartment buildings. 2. The changed conditions, which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: The duplexes were established on-site in 1963 before the current Office zoning was assigned to the site. At the time of development the site was zoned R-1, a single-family residential zone. Office zoning was assigned to the parcels in 1999. Prior to the 1999 rezoning, land to the north, south and west was zoned R-3 (Medium -Density Residential). The R-3 zoning regulations in effect today largely reflect the regulations and purpose of the R-3 zoning in place in 1999. 3. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general welfare: Changing the zoning classification of the site to R-3 will support the current and future residential use of the site(s). Application of a residential zoning classification will assist in preventing the property from falling into a state of disrepair resulting from the City's reluctance to issue building permits for substantial remodeling and repair projects. Located on 20th Ave, the property fronts one of Pasco's arterial corridors. It is important to pay special attention to 3 Page 74 of 252 the appearance of high visibility locations such as this one and bringing properties into zoning conformance is one technique that can be applied to help prevent blighted sites. 4. The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property and the Comprehensive Plan: The site can be considered in a transition area where two (commercial & residential) different land use designation meet. Policy LU -3-E encourages higher -density residential development where utilities and transportation facilities enable efficient use of capital resources. Plan Policy H -1-A encourages the location of medium and high density housing near arterial streets. Policy H -1- B suggests medium and high density housing should be located to avoid the need for access through lower density neighborhoods. Goal H-3 encourages the preservation of the existing housing stock for current and future residents. 5. The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted: Under the current zoning classification the property owner will be unable to refinance the site and make improvements. Many times properties with non- conforming zoning suffer deferred maintenance because owners become disinterested in investing in maintenance costs. This can lead to blighted sites which may lead to economic disinvestment in the immediate vicinity. It is in the best interest of the City to protect against the establishment and spread of blight. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is currently zoned "O" (Office) . 2. The 0.43 -acre site is comprised of two parcels each containing one residential duplex. 3. A total of four (4) dwelling units are involved in this rezone application. 4. The duplexes have occupied the property since 1963. 5. Prior to 1999 the property was zoned R-3 Medium -Density Residential. 6. The applicant is requesting R-3 (Medium -Density Residential) zoning be assigned to the site to bring the current land use into conformance with the zoning. .19 Page 75 of 252 7. The property to the north of the site is zoned "O" (Office) . 8. The site directly fronts N 201h Avenue. 9. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site to be in a land use transitional zone bordering commercial and residential land use designations. 10. The R-3 zone allows a maximum residential density rate of one dwelling unit for every 3,000 square feet of land area. 11. The R-3 zone allows minimum lot sizes of 5,500 square feet. 12. The site is approximately 18,900 square feet in area. 13. Application of the R-3 zone to the site would bring the four dwelling units into full conformity with zoning regulations. 14. The Comprehensive Plan Major Street Plan map classifies North 20th Avenue as a principal arterial roadway. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a zoning amendment the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.88.060. The criteria are as follows: 1. The proposal is in accordance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The property is in an area of transition between residential and commercial land use designations. In transition areas properties can be zoned to match either of the identified land uses. Plan Policy H -1-A encourages the location of medium and high density housing near arterial streets. Policy H -1-B suggests medium and high density housing should be located to avoid the need for access through lower density neighborhoods. Goal H-3 encourages the preservation of the existing housing stock for current and future residents. Land Use Policy LU -3-B encourages "infill" development while H -2-A suggests the City permit a full range of residential environments. Housing Policy (H -B -A) encourages standards that control the scale and density of accessory buildings and homes to maintain compatibility with other residential uses. The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will not be materially detrimental. 2. There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole. There is merit in providing an increased range of housing opportunities available in those areas currently served by municipal utilities to enable efficient use of capital resources. The proposal is supported by land use goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. R Page 76 of 252 3. Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. There are no identifiable potential impacts in need of mitigation by way of conditioning. 4. A Concomitant Agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. A concomitant agreement does not need to accompany this rezone. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve a rezone for the properties at 1804 8s 1808 N 20th Ave. (parcels 119-321-127 and 119-321-118) from "O" to R-3. 6 Page 77 of 252 Vicinity Item: Rezone "O° to R-3 Map Applicant: Ruben & Carmen Escalera File #: Z 2015-005 j _. ✓'Riga 4 .� sa A^- • % 1 11 TM, r r. a r - - *T____ X11 '1" 16 � "_'Y'•� Tri - r, jJ, lob 11 TM, r r. a r - - *T____ X11 '1" 16 � "_'Y'•� Tri - r, jJ, Land Use Item: Rezone "O" to R-3 Applicant: Ruben & Carmen Escalera Map File #: Z 2015-005 Single - Single -Family Homes W M N Homes Residential Apartments Comm. City Park PEARL ST OPAL ST Single -Family Homes AGATE ST ,qK a� SIT e� a� - �o C City Park PEARL ST OPAL ST Single -Family Homes AGATE ST ,qK Zoning Item: Rezone "O" to R-3 Applicant: Ruben & Carmen Escalera x Map File #: Z 2015-005 R-1 (Low -Density Residential) R-3 Office (Med. Res.) _[]O ., O.. ISI (Low -Density Residential) � W N N PEARL ST ttott R1 R-3 SIT (Low -Density Residential) OPAL ST C-1 � o N N AGATE ST Office ?volt Looking North . �. �i., . ., y w . _ r. _ ` . . . ,. r . +Y a _ —._ �_ � � }' e � � S _ _ � �s Yom' � — � _ L7 ���'+ - �� � — - ' -T � �j •• shad• - ' �. - �- - - � _ -- - �r�� T _ � � - . _ �. - - _ -. � .' .. ,- � . .. - . � - _ - .. _. .� � � _ - .. -- � � _ . . .. _ � - - E, . �'. :• . _ . _. .ria t �- ..L ..` .,.:�'� -:'tip ... ..+.t �� .. ... v... .<a'�i �. �.. _.«.; .. .min--. ... _.... v.. c.. ..... . ...n. .�_.. .... _a . .., .... y..1-. .....K .. �. +... ... v._.. . .�_._.�-i :iv �.. �_-.-��. �. �. �..�\tti= r � - r- MR MR _ y r 1L .•.fit � h%•J, � - , t ` ` - - . .��. .,� � ���. \l- ! �3. _ -_ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 12/17/2015 C. Rezone Rezone from "O" (Office) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Ruben Escalera)(MF# Z 2015-005) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Shane O'Neill, Planner I, discussed the rezone application from "O" (Office) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential). The parcel currently contains two duplexes although the site is zoned Office and has been zoned Office for the past 16 years. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as an area of transition between Commercial and Residential land use designations. The request is to rezone the duplexes to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) which would bring the structures into full compliance with the zoning code. The duplexes were established onsite roughly 36 years ago, but 20 years later the sites were zoned Office. Office zones are commonly used to create a buffer between more and less intense land uses, however, a buffer can still be achieved with high density residential. The area would continue to function as a buffer between the traffic on 20th Avenue and the low density residential neighborhood to the west. The applicant is seeking the rezone to eliminate the non -conforming status of his property. Banks often will not lend on non -conforming properties. Staff noted that 20th Avenue is an area of the community that could be considered a gateway and land uses visible from gateway areas have an enhanced effect on the perception of the economic state of the community. It may be in the best interest of the City to avoid any blighted conditions that would be the result of deferred maintenance due to lack of maintenance stemming from the current non -conforming status of the property. Commissioner Polk asked if this building has always functioned as a duplex. Mr. O'Neill responded that they were originally developed as two duplexes, one on each parcel 36 years ago. Commissioner Polk asked why it was rezoned as Office. Dave McDonald, City Planner, responded that back in 1999 when the City updated the Comprehensive Plan as required by the Growth Management Act (GMA), the GMA required consistency between zoning. It was at that time the property was rezoned to Office to provide consistency with the Plan, without realizing the impact it would have on the duplexes. Commissioner Portugal addressed parking concerns on 20th Avenue and the impact of traffic. Mr. O'Neill responded that currently there are two very wide driveways and the four residential units have existed for the past 36 years and there haven't been any issues the City is aware of. The proposal won't exasperate any existing conditions, it will remain as it has existed. Page 85 of 252 Commissioner Polk clarified the existing use as a duplex. Chairman Cruz reminded the Planning Commission that it is all relative and duplexes or small offices won't generate much of a difference in vehicle trips per day. Ruben Escalera, 3612 W. Agate Street, spoke on behalf of his property. He explained that he needs the rezone in order to refinance or sell this property. This zoning has been a burden on him since they have been taxed more and charged more in utilities for it being zoned Office. Whether the rezone goes through or not, the duplexes will still remain. The rezone will simply help him with the financial burden it has become. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Greenway moved, seconded by Commissioner Mendez, to close the hearing on the proposed rezone and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the January 21, 2016 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Page 86 of 252 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1/21/16 C. Rezone Rezone from "O" (Office) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) (Ruben Escalera) (MF# Z 2015-005) Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the rezone from "O" (Office) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential). There were no additional comments. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve a rezone for the properties at 1804 8s 1808 N. 20th Avenue (parcels 119-321-127 and 119-321-118) from "O" to R-3. The motion passed unanimously. Page 87 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White Director, Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Rezone: C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) Coles Estates (MF# Z 2015-004) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Ordinance Report to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 12/17/15 & 1/21/16 H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , an ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, rezoning Lot 6, Coles Estates from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential), and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On December 17, 2015 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend rezoning Lot 6, Coles Estates from C-1 to R-1. Lot 6, Coles Estates is located on Road 90 north of Sandifur Parkway. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to recommend a change in zoning for the property in question. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. V. DISCUSSION: Page 88 of 252 The site is part of the Coles Estates that was platted for residential development in 1967. In 1982 Coles Estates was annexed to the City and a portion of the subdivision was zoned C-1 (Retail Business). The site has remained vacant and undeveloped since it was platted in the sixties. The applicant, Bardown Consulting is seeking to change the zoning classification of property from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low -Density Residential) to allow development of 20 single-family residential lots. Page 89 of 252 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, REZONING LOT 6, COLES ESTATES FROM C-1 (RETAIL BUSINESS) TO R-1 (LOW-DENSITY DENSITY RESIDENTIAL). WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification has been received and an open record hearing having been conducted by the Pasco Planning Commission upon such petition; and, WHEREAS, that the effect of the requested change in zoning classification shall not be materially detrimental to the immediate vicinity; and, WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner, that: (A) the requested change for the zoning classification is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan; (B) the requested change in zoning classification is consistent with or promotes the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan serving the general public interest in the community; and (C) there has been a change in the neighborhood or community needs or circumstances warranting the requested change of the zoning classification; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from C-1 (Retail Business) to R- 1 (Medium -Density Residential) for the real property as shown in the Exhibit "1" attached hereto and described as follows: Lot 6, Coles Estate Section 2. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1St day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 91 of 252 11 1111 t ■t■ REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: Z 2015-004 HEARING DATE: 12/17/2015 ACTION DATE: 1/21/2016 BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Bardown Consulting P.O. Box 3252 Pasco, WA 99302 REQUEST: REZONE: Rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low -Density Residential) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 6 Coles Estates General Location: 5800 Block of Road 90 Property Approximately 5 acres 2. ACCESS: The property has access from Road 90 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities serve the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Business) and is vacant. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-3 - Vacant (Proposed Senior Housing Project) SOUTH: C-1 - Vacant & Veterinarian Clinic EAST: R-1 - Single -Family Dwellings WEST: C-1- Vacant 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates much of the site for mixed -residential development. R-1 zoning is one of the zones permitted in this land use classification. Plan Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community while Plan Policy H -1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. 1 Page 93 of 252 ANALYSIS The site is part of the Coles Estates that was platted for residential development in 1967. In 1982 Coles Estates was annexed to the City and a portion of the subdivision was zoned C-1 (Retail Business). The site has remained vacant and undeveloped since it was platted in the sixties. In 2009 an LID ( Local Improvement Distrcit) was formed to extend Road 90 north from Sandifur Parkway past the site. Some utility services were also included with the street improvements. The applicant, Bardown Consulting is seeking to change the zoning classification of property from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low -Density Residential) to allow development of 20 single-family residential lots. The City's Comprehensive Plan designates this site for Mixed Residential land uses which permits a variety of residential zoning ranging from RS -20 (Suburban) through R-3. R-1 zoning would permit the applicant to develop residential lots with a minimum square footage of 7,200 square feet. In this case the applicant is proposing to develop residential lots with an average minimum lot size of 8,468 square. The frontage requirements for residential lots will not enable the applicant to achieve an average lot size of 7,200 square feet as permitted by R-1 zoning. The lots in the neighboring subdivision to the east average about 8,400 square feet in size. The subdivision (Vintage Village) to the east is zoned R-1 in 2003 and contains over 140 lots. The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC. 25.88.030. The criteria are listed below as follows: 1. The date the existing zone became effective: The current zoning classification was established 33 years ago when the property was annexed to the City in 1982. 2. The changed conditions, which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: The property to the east of the site was developed in the early 2000's and now contains 140 single-family homes on lots with at least 8,400 square feet. The property to the north was rezoned R-3 for a senior housing project in 2013. Prior to 2013 a single-family subdivision (Broadmoor Estates) was developed at the north end of Road 90. In 2009 Road 90 built past the site in question connecting Broadmoor Estates to Sandifur Parkway. Municipal utilities were also installed when Road 90 was improved. 2 Page 94 of 252 In 2014 145 plus acres of land was rezoned from RT to C -I at the northwest corner of the Road 100 and I-182 Interchange providing additional land inventory for future commercial development needs. 3. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general welfare: The property has remained vacant and undeveloped since 1982 when it was annexed and zoned C-1. Based on the changing conditions identified in Number 2 above the property could be developed if the rezone was granted. The general welfare of the community would be advanced by enabling the development of a residential neighborhood to provide additional housing opportunities for Pasco residents. Development of the property would eliminate a possible fire hazard created by the accumulation of weeds on the property and would eliminate the potential of blowing dust that impacts the residential neighborhood to the east and north. 4. The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property and the Comprehensive Plan: A change in zoning classification will protect and maintain the value and character of the adjoining residential properties to the north and east. The rezone will also increase the number of residential units in the neighborhood creating a larger customer base for local businesses and the possible expansion of businesses creating jobs and an improved tax base. The proposed rezone is consistent with the land use map of the Comprehensive Plan and supports the goal (Goal H-2) of maintaining a variety of housing options for residents while protecting and enhancing the established character of existing residential neighborhoods (Policy H -1-B). 5. The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted: Without a rezone it is highly probable the property will continue to remain vacant for many years due the fact it is not in a highly visible location for commercial development. INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Business). 3 Page 95 of 252 2. The site was annexed to the City in 1982 and zoned C-1. 3. The site is identified in the Comprehensive Plan for mixed residential development. Mixed -residential development permits a range of residential zoning form RS -20 to R-3. 4. The applicant is requesting a rezone to R-1 (Low -Density Residential) . S. The site is part of the Coles Estate that was platted in 1967. 6. The property to the east of the site was rezoned R-1 (Single -Family) and platted into residential lots in the early 2000's. There are now 140 single- family homes located to the east of the site. 7. In 2013 the parcel to the north of the site was rezoned R-3 with a concomitant agreement to allow the development of a senior housing complex comprised of single-family homes and a community club house all located on 4.70 acres. 8. Broadmoor Estates to the north and northwest of the site has been developed with single-family homes over the past 7 years. 9. Majestia Estates was recently approved for development on the west side of Road 90. Majestia Estates is a 38 lot single-family residential development located about a 160 feet to the northwest of the proposed rezone site. 10. Road 90 was fully developed in 2009 with street and utility improvements. 11. The 145 acres of the Adams property to the west of Road 100 was rezoned C-1 in 2014 increasing the land inventory of commercial zoned property.. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a zoning amendment the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.88.060. The criteria are as follows: 1. The proposal is in accordance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates much of the site for mixed - residential development. R-1 zoning is one of the zones permitted in this land use classification. Plan Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community while Plan Policy H -1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. 2. There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole. There is merit in increasing housing opportunities available in those areas currently served by municipal utilities and near public transportation and will enable efficient use of capital resources. The proposal is supported by land use goals and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. Development of the property would eliminate a possible fire hazard created by the accumulation of weeds on the property and 2 Page 96 of 252 would eliminate the potential of blowing dust that impacts the residential neighborhood to the east and north. 3. Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. No conditions are needed for this rezone. 4. A Concomitant Agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. A concomitant agreement is not needed. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION: I move based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the rezone of Lot 6 Coles Estates Road from C-1 to R-1. R Page 97 of 252 1111 11 Zoning Map Item: Columbia Dunes Rezone C- I to R- I A, licant: Bardown Consultin N lr---VFP File Z 2015-004 -= I = I MEN moll rdq., rIT.-M, 11 1111 Emil t ' }' r r..• �Z! q a�'c It if If It e Al i.].- '. v - CdIJIfr ldl Tee.f 61 �T if, it I.If% '1 f ' t r ., r •T. _ _,y,(1 htll...e ` 4e 4 �dK d ' y - - }e v... _ 4 !' .•. tf - �.._ - 1 f ; {. 1xx•yt YE 4 ,r M.y°1.' _q, �Yi' .X' f. dray '�Ci,; c r \ J I if ; ✓ G iJt' � r', t ' � �' i M H T � � z $. � y l' J� 1l � a 1 r , r IT L< f' ,� -5.'f.J - ' q .r .. - (' ti J/ r '-` .t.! •, • :{ - ,d t'. l i. �� i1.4 ,1 'i '.r :`L t, .F•� i — -t }a.l ,d }s- h. - '., ,1' ~r , • ( ,� -� 4 r �. 1 y1 r _ Sl , �. - i I .� 1' 1 �,ti.r r� ".ri '�/-.i-''I "}'' , n- .a tow �! J- �j��'.•`r �.\.. Jry-L-„. ri;.. .i. 'i''. �. -.: � �_- �'�/�� I.ly. �, �- - '7^ { �_ r}'d� � t_ +�A ri _ �' S. /R V� , : , ., � ., '.�� a i �,,. l •. I - f }� * p} _:. h.. �����:5 _ f � -.- ) - ` ,I_tI,•!, - C' :'\",. '�)_,. i ,.. e- ,• _r ; - 'Tt rjl. I 1 7�-J 't• I �- _ - , X14 n�,� rd "/ .M'. I' ( ld 4 } �{_ :} f., �r .._t °� I� 1, �, ,t I,,r--. .�^ rl. '.; }: HT1 red . ::, �:'� .i.. , t;'.vi ,'v 1. „ \ py''C ;Y• �. 'r'n:�/,�• ,_'� ^41� j -a 'Y �. ,,r. �:1.,- .f'� tr .14. 't., 'I u3. .1 S ^-'r 1, - 1 [,.I''- ,' !` - .. i' e� / -f l' :�''-• . , .6 , � .. .. P f i. � .= A. q l• t. -L, Y (l ; v l: i ` l' ' If i T, �` - :',y,Y '. t, t -.' '' _ "f �.i`:,. ri- - I' 1. •f'.'�. y.l_'1 L r - h 'I1 ,. I ,. �R f. •� •- \'4l,'.i I 'f' 1' '] A't' - 1 x, did It �q ,• J' •^J ;_ :{ ,i .A $. d'-' :cr _•• } �1� fr,• __ 'r` , 'ln 'i .:f' { :'4 rJjY..! _ } f ah- 10 It 0{ G{ :It •Y:'- .I. r :i. .. ,d L �'� �.r 'n� � �*' 1 �' 1 'r ^! ra. !)' 1. r "� Y I "c. jt ; { rif �'_ �{ Y p y Tf '¢ II %(¢yj� ,�tir" � a J` }. c a� i' r 'f l' 1 .li T_ jed,N ,, ,1. •.f, \ h �}'y ee '! is Y 'i dllje�, P�:: tdo ' n .. 1.1 1 , II ({fy� i(' 'Y: �y R -'�l ITT`r I 4t v •' If -�' 14 t%fleF.i 'I:�i ,. - �. 1 .I” dieN'I r 1• f 1- , /r• 1 \Aside .r ...4-d.- i ' a . :*�P I'I ,'-'J,�.. },2� �',y 1-C .A \ r di f: ,... ,_ 't ;"`'IJ `Y'•.`y,' 4- _4'. :1 ° , ` € d'%- „ ! ,i'' q, 1 Al'\ 1" "4 L — ':�1�. ...'(a, r dc•a •, ->, �./. f ,r t •IY C ,' "6'I .I f� j `t I: - `. -rr f r F''I !.' f v !: ', tI': r1 r �'' +� Y _ .4 .1 - i,( L I.f^ y- /r 7. ,�.. II , `. rri. l• - loed-%': : d (' I" 'IIII/I t :lv 1i. L, - 'T -r.,7, ._,. ' �. �,., \ 1 �1.! •C1 .' y�+, t:_ �Pl v. i, �.a1-'iC - .{p. i .4 cP".� 'I�F' II'1 (-'AI P, ,I, \-S. J.. 1. 1'.7, jr •r �r 11�r. ',^f _.1 (., ,�1_ - - ''-'F,. �� • 1 d / t , , . I tl : T e. l '1 .. S r . 1 `` . ,' :� �I, i .4. �� 1 - � . 1, I � '\ 'a ' I , ! - ,! __ h IL• j�I.rt.i `• \i. :I-`, i I• I .rt•,. FI K, N .A t' t. / '"i+_'S�1, r'if (3�� j11YY Y i' Y .I', if If 7.. t•' -•i �I' -v d(�l 1 ^f' i �' /\_'J -D n 'Y' l;l:.0--d 1) .r Ir ,f •:h ',l +P.�� r^ ,/ II- n �y '1 •�f-`J}v:`'�, ! �T) 'e °I Yif L v1 .I�. tr r 1{I �.1 �. e:.+r - L 11 - ,r ', r p _ I '\''i" 1 l h f ' Tr.. L , - ! . -,` • f i , _ _ 1 �y'I'*r. 1 fl. _ i , /; :r J.. 'd ' , -t: �- yti,• "'n R- :, / r ; - i { 'V,` '' 1�VJ 1..• _( v: - -� .+.q:.f .y iI 1.'•- `\ , fi r r �,..;.. F Y /_- !. } ' , / I _ = �. k1�.-_";1 ��",:-``I -951" .M f ,J,:� ! �,} 9'' / '-t' :.f- !• !1 ..'.-�, '1-=.- % .,„- 7' �.. t 1; i ,! �: :T .. f d.r il'� _I. ,_r ,_+ t-., Y, ,4,i 1•: i., th 1,S l- I� 1 did . It t 1 �. / deed Aelf I ', A !.' f��{ \' : eF �. ••- y.' _( p,.• n II - ,.N.'• \ 'rIIN �, �q o �. /. 1 .� y�};y F•ii I-�r r/..,I 4-x f I��, ,I, IF ..w�", C/.1IIII 11 lih. J (. `, I_'� ;f \'+�. '�\ ' _-l��l. �i 7_r.1. S• 'R_ae A, P,: -! ,1tr _l r' _;1(..1� '"�6' nl `f r. t i1 I �l .,I' ; \I\.; 1� ,. .R : 'dI J - f,�. dIL^f: _ �k Y Y/ .> I. �.. ,.1111\. .I`, r.%.. 1' I''. - .I \ 11 r I ..,h ,r'_\il ��.. 1: •'�..: i. i 4 }i h` 1 If j l \ _... y; fed' 4 /. ,1^ .` -- ' !! 1 (lig I f'I 1 j`�`V 1, I�1 ,, rl _. I' 4 rri 'I. 1 I' ^ I. I ! r f r I It i VIA an I If I VAN No IV Act V IN y to IN It .,,;_;Lay .;i� yj L ` �•y IN ,.4� Nat < �Valan I .. .j .. �, •¢, \ �Dl%-.- Yea d .t��. rr {'li lr.If AV9•NI, A .. x ,yZY'kalill �INI � alf If gm w IV 4 lei t3t. If sir Fes.11ASJ •,� ,�''.'lJ' '\� J'; �' .a 7 4. .. It r; In -•ice .. J; aft v� a �, '!' e . i� ,`n -i�• Rp flat .may'.5P .a H .N IN 11 INNAIL.23- w,3� r y� G - IL It I ♦ T < _ 1� ��.csp1_r� _. e ams, -,d VIAr+'r $�r `-Y c'fd a r -'.T', ' I•' �e'+o5 _ cIf al as V I IN I Al AI INA IN -��� It j;e t, +,e v _ MrAC• +�`. > - � n e ♦ '' . _ t 'r ,-Ar IN IN L'f-'}Ca4 ABIN NN lar na At IN A _ i. . �. •ems > - 1 � ! 9 _ r' la •J�(a f( �— AV INN IN all! ANN" al Nr IF IN ANA 40 vNi If IN Not te VAN gal dr. `.iVreT-T"i{i.;r Hr 1', na si btnc � . .. FI. e' _. Looking ast Ike,rN4�' _ �u�iGy.. ' Lam' - I ». ,w _ _ - NN IN i III p AN VIA n AlANN wIN, Ar ; �r . .0A '�'.w '.-. !'�6. ' ti• i''�` �" '^-' '•„ 4. 'f',hOld „ Al �. AV 01" LLLL ._~ - ; - It AV N A aft AN *&%N It IN li-- ....., , nt a•a.;c-,- 3 - •: Mcg t j:lCit)�.lir'i!� y�� is �! }r 1tr Pn� -�ry .E•Y t r'r !!, IN IV �. . til'It i �v��4 r., It :r< `r; 4H 'h�,+� ', IiQ�,f!I ILL ^`•E' :„'• t, is e: j f, , :ti, _ IFI 1 y lj� '�J.`y'J p L - � `{• �ay /`It All 11V1'+, .IN :.:�\� l rV �[g' t �•�; V �.y �11 �•nr'4 �1�. ', ... 'tai --'Y a..'x='%: +. :It hV Alm IH �';.2' 4 „L , ,. ''vf'• .1 4,' . l rt .y �'. .. , . 11 u .. I J ` � 1 h r i' 9 t' ,tl 1V i , T +• ' ti a:•s•Y ..4 ne•�:.l,t la 5.. ..•.t; r ,y ... - 9 uM4 IN I ••, V '. �: r, Nt ti, �dWA, Na IN I It M anal If nrIN trq It Il'ie t LJ'1 - [I li.. 'iI YI .. ' AIN 0.7 If 00 3 ,t tAj d �,��4', 11 Lqq F•! p l k,. , l ei •.:- SID.. y iI ` ,F1 i P � r,. S71iISR1f .. ,L 7 In ar _ ' f5i �f rf.f A! qa ^, .�2 ''11'*y ♦ `( �`'` .;IX :;:9 mo�w, ]]1�1.' r ` �1(''ll�. ip'•y,Jl`,Iyy,1/� �.y\` ``��4 �, •,I:l 'ty if qtr''.• t: A, 7°�6 ,Lk ,. . ' �I�S.... -,i e•: Gl 1r1 I,:f_IUI. \_ \N Ic L15. ,Ha 3,z .., SA F t . k a + V J X. ti ��� '!. 1-34 yY rein ~.r IN rY. { -I o-yYi ��; .tet• :`y ;• - �,Nt '- e R,._ 3 •t. r - - — - -- If It- PFFFFFF fR•' fes.1r - , , ,> T • 4�,�� � T' _ _ l' f a. � `'G .. •VIS. If Ilk F 116 At ! y Y S _ •�Gp� y LI fl .,� If , Y r If Ile F7 9 r'-, Ir - jIl�;or 'r'..t .•.� Etiy ~ -_t"_ LYi! L'v 'tili �,,��1 ♦ti Irn Yf 1 `f y� .15 - 1y � w.-,: . � - - t,z;3.fiS P'. _ .ti`4. ' �. '�' ��.-�."F�'. F^ .,.� S�� � � ih4. r �y � W �''�a 4." '. � __' Vie•- t _; n � � E ;�, ref"' '7Ya �` t y'�` � �l 6 - r w �7y� ,������-ti�R_� , `Ts , '� ` 1. _.k._.•� t ��- r -- � �,afr •. _ __ ;� �!1 /i .'1 -.�- _ ���r.�' - �N`i,''��� a• - � , 'tit Ile L rry- � �.. - '�Y fy •1 I •^ s, � e.",`�7�Fw•- 3. Y'' f • �l` S- If "Alf ! 1�+ '• ..ty13` ym O.. ��,A'�16 al y t �W' a{*'•�r�Q� 7a.� rm f LIT IV iE 4a�2 . -;/i"' _ .,8. y r _ .-'-i'1' tet." -..'!1L T� �..s��'y- x+ •'• •t'C _ ..Y ,Mt'I t�`G _ r . v. N r: �. _ .i...R n••.,fr.. wv.-' /^'<<y�- y�' ham. - _ s•:..Will 411111.� A _. ,µ -' ll ^ J•JQ oallbotd. - I - �x iY R �t 4;67P - lT+_ .i pJ; 1`. -- X - - �- a -. - -: _ . • Yi :v r�N !e^•�R-;- - •i � . _ C . ._....�,,..!�Fsa... _. - t _ , If _ A s4 ' 1. ,14 r TI t fm ` .fir-•tc I�, t _.ol IL If - - - - - - If qI 10 If If } i / - •'7, It I If III, - If IV -IN Ir yyy YI' i I If PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 12/17/15 A. Rezone Rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) (Bardown Consulting LLC) (MF# Z 2015-0041 Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the rezone application from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential). This lot is part of the Coles Estates Subdivision that was platted in 1967 but has remained vacant since that time. The applicant would like to move forward and develop a small single-family residential development. Last year the Planning Commission entertained a rezone and preliminary plat application directly to the northwest of this site for a 37-38 lot single-family residential development and site to the north was rezoned to R-3 with a concomitant agreement containing only single-family homes on one lot for a senior housing project. The subdivision to the east is zoned R-1 and is fully developed. This project will also entail a preliminary plat. The proposal is to run a cul-de-sac down the middle of a 4.7 acre parcel and place lots on either side to make 20 lots. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Polk stated that normally she doesn't like rezoning commercial zoning to residential but in this case it adheres to the character of the surrounding zoning. Chairman Cruz agreed that the proposed rezone matches the character of the nearby zoning. Commissioner Polk moved, seconded by Commissioner Portugal, to close the hearing on the proposed rezone and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the January 21, 2016 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1/21/16 A. Rezone Rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) (Bardown Consulting LLC) (MF# Z 2015-0041 Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the rezone application from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential). There were no additional comments. Page 106 of 252 Commissioner Bowers asked if senior housing was being developed on the R-3 site located next to the proposed property. Mr. McDonald responded that is correct. Commissioner Bowers asked for clarification as to where Majestia Place is located. Mr. McDonald indicated on the site map where it is located. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Portugal, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Portugal, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the rezone of Lot 6, Coles Estates Road from C-1 to R-1. The motion passed unanimously. -2- Page 107 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director, Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Rezone: C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low -Density Residential) Court Street (MF# Z 2016-001) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Ordinance Report to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 1/21/16 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , an ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, rezoning Lots 17 through 32 Block 10, Sylvester's 2nd Addition from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential), and further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On January 21, 2016 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend rezoning Lots 17 through 32 Block 10, Sylvester's 2nd Addition from C-1 to R-1. These lots are located in the 900 block of West Court Street. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to recommend a change in zoning for the property in question. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. Page 108 of 252 V. DISCUSSION: The current C-1 zoning has made it difficult for property owners in the 900 block of W. Court Street to sell, refinance or insure their homes. The proposed rezone will eliminate the non -conforming issues and will create constancy between the residential land uses, zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. Page 109 of 252 • Item: Court Street Rezone - C- 1 to R- 1 Vicinity Map Applicant: City of Pasco N File #. Z 2016-001 a v. • 1 , .CD �7CD Ab. - Q Ok- URT ST _ T-_ - -- SITE W _ L r r - - ° r _ ■ -_ i= _ (00 19 - = BROWN ST I _ -%N J v. r r - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, REZONING LOTS 17-32 BLOCK 10, SYLVESTER'S 2ND ADDITION FROM C-1 (RETAIL BUSINESS) TO R-1 (LOW-DENSITY DENSITY RESIDENTIAL). WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification has been received and an open record hearing having been conducted by the Pasco Planning Commission upon such petition; and, WHEREAS, that the effect of the requested change in zoning classification shall not be materially detrimental to the immediate vicinity; and, WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner, that: (A) the requested change for the zoning classification is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan; (B) the requested change in zoning classification is consistent with or promotes the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan serving the general public interest in the community; and (C) there has been a change in the neighborhood or community needs or circumstances warranting the requested change of the zoning classification; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the Zoning Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from C-1 (Retail Business) to R- 1 (Medium -Density Residential) for the real property as shown in the Exhibit "1" attached hereto and described as follows: Lots 17-32 Block 10, Sylvester's 2nd Addition Section 2. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1St day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 111 of 252 Exhibit Item: Court Street Rezone Applicant: City of Pasco #1 File #: Z 2016-001 w s aCD w a rn w Q 0 - C-1 to R-1 RUBY ST COURT ST BROWN ST w Q 00 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: Z 2016-001 HEARING DATE: 1/21/2016 ACTION DATE: 2/18/2016 BACKGROUND APPLICANT: City of Pasco PO Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 REQUEST: REZONE: Rezone from "C-1" (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low - Density Residential) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lots 17-32 Block 10, Sylvester's 2nd Addition General Location: 900 Block of W. Court Street. Property 1.35 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Court Street. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal sewer and water lines currently serve the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site encompasses half a City block and is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Business). The site contains six houses and a small apartment building. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: C-1 &v R-3 - Various businesses and a four-plex SOUTH: R-1 - Low -Density EAST: "O" - Office WEST: R-1 - Captain Gray Elementary School 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The property is designated for low-density development. Goal H-1 encourages development of housing for all economic segments of the population. Goal H-3 encourages the preservation of the existing housing stock for current and future residents. Land Use Policy LU -3-13 encourages "infill" development. Other goals and policies suggest the City permit a full range of residential environments including single- family homes (H -2-A) and develop standards that control the scale and density of accessory buildings and homes to maintain compatibility with other residential uses (H-4-13). 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of 1 Page 113 of 252 Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. r_`,) r_` Wk -I Ly The south side of West Court Street in the 900 block has been zoned for retail business activities for over 35 years. Years ago it was standard practice to zone major streets extending from central business cores for commercial businesses. This occurred in Pasco along Clark Street, Lewis Street, Columbia Street and Court Street. Commercial zoning along major streets is often referred to as strip commercial zoning and was done to accommodate or encourage commercial development. Many of the commercially zoned areas along the major streets in Pasco were already developed with houses when the zoning was established. Prior to 1982 commercial zoning did not impact housing development because single-family homes were classified as a permitted use in commercial zones. Houses could be built, remodel, enlarged, sold and refinanced in commercial zones without difficulty. Changes in the banking industry over the past 20 years have made it very difficult buy or sell residential properties in commercial zoning districts. The current C-1 zoning has created difficult circumstances for the property owners in the 900 block of West Court Street. The homes in the 900 block of West Court are considered non -conforming uses and as such have become difficult to sell or refinance. When property owners seek to refinance a property the Planning Department is routinely contacted by prospective lenders. Bank agents inquire about zoning and whether or not the current use of the property may be re-established in the event of a major fire or other calamity. Pursuant to the non -conforming uses section of the Zoning Code (PMC Chapter 25.72) if a non -conforming building is damaged to the extent that repair costs exceed 50% of the assessed value the building cannot be re -constructed. Banks often refuse to issue loans for non -conforming uses or will charge exceptionally high interest rates and or require larger down payments. A property owner in the 900 block of West Court recently had a sale of his house fall through because of the C-1 zoning. This has been an ongoing problem in this residential block. Rather than address the problem one lot at a time staff published a hearing notice for a rezone to include the whole block. The block in question has been identified in the City Comprehensive plan for residential development since 1980. From 1980 to 1999 the block was designated for medium -density residential development and has been designated for low-density development since 1999. Page 114 of 252 Zoning the property C-1 many years ago has not resulted in commercial development in the 900 block of West Court Street. The predominant use has remained single-family residential. The residential lots in the 900 block of West Court Street are no sized to be conducive to commercial development. Rezoning the block to R-1 would bring the zoning in to conformance with the land use and the designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning the block would also benefit the small apartment building at the corner of 10th Avenue and Court Street. The non -conforming provision in the zoning regulation were amended in 2005 to allow non -conforming multi -family structures located in single-family zones to be rebuilt following damage after a fire or other causes. Under the C-1 zoning this apartment building cannot be rebuilt if it was damaged by more than 50% of its value. The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC. 25.88.030. The criteria are listed below as follows: 1. The date the existing zone became effective: The current C-1 zoning classification was established over 35 years ago. Houses have been located on the property since 1950. 2. The changed conditions, which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: The Comprehensive Plan was amended in 1999 to call for low-density residential development in the 900 block of West Court Street. The main centers for commercial activity within Pasco have bypassed the 900 block of Court Street and given the small size of the lots in this block it is very unlikely commercial development would ever occur in this area. 3. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general welfare: Changing the zoning classification of the site to R-1 will support the current and future residential use within the block. Application of a residential zoning will assist in preventing properties from falling into a state of disrepair resulting from the City's inability to issue building permits for substantial remodeling and repair projects. The general welfare of the community would be supported by allowing investment to occur in properties along the 900 block of West Court Street. 4. The effect it will have on the value and character of the adjacent property and the Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan designates the property for low-density residential uses. Goal H-3 encourages the preservation of the existing housing stock for 3 Page 115 of 252 current and future residents. Other goals and policies suggest the City permit a full range of residential environments including single- family homes (H -2-A) and develop standards that control the scale and density of accessory buildings and homes to maintain compatibility with other residential uses (H -4-B). 5. The effect on the property owner or owners if the request is not granted: Under the current zoning classification the property owners have a very difficult time selling or refinancing their properties. Often properties with non -conforming zoning suffer deferred maintenance because owners become disinterested in investing in maintenance costs. This can lead to blighted sites which may lead to economic disinvestment in the immediate vicinity. It is in the best interest of the City to protect against the establishment and spread of blight. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Business) . 2. The 1.35 -acre site is part of a residential subdivision that contains six single-family homes and one apartment building. There are no commercial structures on the property. 3. The property was platted in 1890 with narrow 25 foot wide lots not conducive for modern commercial development needs. 4. The 900 block of West Court Street has been occupied with houses since 1950. 5. Prior to 1999 the Comprehensive Plan designated the property for medium -density residential uses. Since 1999 the property has been designated for low-density residential uses. 6. The property has been zoned commercially for over 35 years and no commercial development has occurred on the block in that time frame. 7. The current C-1 zoning makes it difficult for home owners to obtain refinancing for home repairs and remodels. :I Page 116 of 252 CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a zoning amendment the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in PMC 25.88.060. The criteria are as follows: 1. The proposal is in accordance with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The Rezoning the property to R-1 would bring the property into conformance with the land use map of the Comprehensive Plan and with Goal H-3 that encourages the preservation of the existing housing stock for current and future residents. 2. There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole. The proposal is supported by the Comprehensive Plan and provides an opportunity for the housing stock to be maintained and improved as a result the rezone will a value to the community. 3. Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. There are no identifiable potential impacts in need of mitigation by way of conditioning. 4. A Concomitant Agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. A concomitant agreement does not need to accompany this rezone. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed rezone and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the February 18, 2016 meeting. E Page 117 of 252 • Item: Court Street Rezone - C- 1 to R- 1 Vicinity Map Applicant: City of Pasco N File #. Z 2016-001 a v. - � 1 , .CD Irk SITE W _ L Ui W M_ _ 00 MItz v . r CO r - Land Use Item: Court Street Rezone Applicant: City of Pasco Map File #: Z 2016-001 w Q Commercial Captain Gray Elementary School w Q RUBY ST Multi-Famil COURT ST SITE - C-1 to R-1 Commercial Off i BROWN STSFDUs Comm. Senior Center c ti BROWN STSFDUs Comm. Senior Center Zoning Item: Court Street Rezone A Map pplicant: City of Pasco File #: Z 2016-001 w Q _ C-1CD R-1 w Q COURT ST SITE BROWN ST RUBY ST - C-1 to R-1 C-1 w co R-1 C-1 INW, JOKIF19 IMC A� - d'. L All _ '-�-- -� 0 f � �~ UA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1/21/16 E. Rezone Rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) (MF# Z 2016-001) Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community 8v Economic Development Director, discussed the rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) . This is a situation the Planning Commission has seen before where this is existing C-1 property currently being used for housing and has been forever. The Comprehensive Plan for the property indicates a low density designation. This particular section of Court Street was zoned for retail business over 35 years ago but it has remained developed with housing. Prior to the early 80's it was common practice to include single-family housing as a permitted use in commercial zones. That has changed since the 80's and the banking industry itself has changed. They are reluctant to refinance or sell if the property is a non -conforming use. Staff has provided the required review of the criteria in the report for the benefit of the Planning Commission. Chairwoman Polk asked if the property on the corner of 101h and Court Street was a multi -family dwelling and if it will still be rezoned as R-1 and compliant with R-1 zoning. Mr. White answered that it won't technically be compliant but it will be more in conformance that it is now. Bob Dahmen, 5001 N. Bristol Street, Tacoma, spoke on behalf of his mother's estate in this proposed rezone. When the zoning was set as C-1 years ago, nobody cared because it also allowed for single-family but now that there is restrictive zoning the property is a non -conforming use. He stated that his family is trying to clean up the estate and sell the home but they have had a sale fall through because the purchaser could not get insurance due to the non-conformance and it could not be rebuilt if more than 50% damaged. They have another offer currently pending on the home and hope to close within a couple of weeks. Mr. Dahmen requested this request to be expedited and moved to Council in order to meet the timeliness of the pending offer on the home. Matthew Polk, 811 W. Margaret Street, stated that he lives down the street from this site. He voiced concern for the lack of commercial zoning and doesn't feel that the City is being wise stewards by eliminating the commercial zoning that exists. All of the surrounding properties to the north are commercial and that needs to be looked at as being developed in commercial applications. He stated that he is sympathetic to what the property owners go through but we need to be responsible in how we maintain positive parts of the neighborhood and develop those commercial pieces of land so that the people living nearby reap those benefits and have a quality of life that has availability of mixed-use zoning. The reason he chose to live in this part of Pasco rather than West Pasco is because there aren't miles and miles of residential. The Page 125 of 252 older style of mixed-use land is more in keeping with the kind of city we should be leaning towards. He encourage the Planning Commission keep these properties zoned commercial and perhaps do things that would make it easier to sell the properties to be utilized for the intended use. Bob Dahmen, 5001 N. Bristol Street, Tacoma, addressed Mr. Polk stating that while he understands his concerns but if he is interested in maintaining commercial uses, would be willing to purchase his mother's estate to use it for commercial use. There have been 6 houses on this block in the past 35 years and not one of them has had any movement towards commercial use. They have all been owned and maintained as owner -occupied residential. The only commercial use that could really go into any of properties is a marijuana paraphernalia shop or other small type of shop unless someone comes along and purchases all of the properties but he hasn't been approached by any buyers for that use. Mary Lynn Hymen, 9413 W. Richardson Road, stated that she is a broker for Advance Realty Group and has been practicing real estate since 1993. She said that Pasco has a shortage of homes in this price point and with the home next door that has been updated and taken care of, there is pride of ownership on this block. With the interest that the Dahmen family has had in this home, shows that there is interest for homes in this price point. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Bowers asked staff if this is rezoned to R-1 if they could open a cafe. Staff responded no. Chairwoman Polk added that there are strict limits on in-home businesses. Mr. White said there are two things to keep in mind: (1) This section of block is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as low density residential so the zoning currently isn't in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and (2) The property owner made the point that the residential setup of the properties with the minimum frontage and little depth doesn't lend itself to commercial zoning. Unless someone owns the entire block, one parcel cannot be used as commercial because you can't get any kind of parking. Commissioner Polk asked if in the future if someone wanted to purchase all of those lots and apply for a rezone if they could. Mr. White said yes but he wouldn't anticipate that happening. Dave McDonald addressed Mr. Dahmen's request to expedite this application and staff doesn't see any reason why it can't. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Bowers, to adopt the Page 126 of 252 findings of fact and conclusions therefore as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Portugal moved seconded by Commissioner Greenaway based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approved the rezone of Lots 17-32 Block 10, Sylvester's 2nd Addition from C-1 to R-1. Page 127 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 26, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit: Modification of Special Permit SP05-098 Moore Mansion (MF# SP 2015-015) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Report to Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 12/17/15 & 1/21/16 H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , accepting the Planning Commission's recommendation and approving the modification of Special Permit SP05-098 for the adaptive reuse of the Moore Mansion property III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On December 17, 2015, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend the City Council approved a modification of the Moore Mansion Special Permit (SP05-098) to allow additional accessory structure on the Moore Mansion property. Following the conduct of the public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that with conditions, it would be appropriate to recommend approval of a modified special permit for the Moore Mansion. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached Resolution. Page 128 of 252 No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. V. DISCUSSION: This application involves modifying the original special permit granted in 2005 by allowing several additional accessory structures be located on the property. The accessory structures include a new carriage house and several portable storage sheds. The current carriage house will be relocated to the lawn area north of the parking lot. The accessory structures will be used to support the weddings and other events that take place on the property. Page 129 of 252 Vicinity Item: Moore Mansion Special Permit Applicant: Brad & Debra Peck Map File #: SP 2015-015 .-SV E S_T_E. YL , I - l VUNIG 5;f I �I 1 a r � �6 SIT C ---- o f-------------------- 4 -a W 0 N RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVING THE MODIFICATION OF THE SPECIAL PERMIT (SP05-098) FOR THE ADAPTIVE REUSE OF THE MOORE MANSION PROPERTY. WHEREAS, Brad and Debra Peck, submitted an application for modification of the Special Permit (SP05-098) granted to the Moore Mansion property in 2005 authorizing weddings and other special events on the property through the adaptive reuse of a historic place; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 17, 2015 to review the modification of Special Permit SP05-098 ; and, WHEREAS, following deliberations on January 21, 2016 the Planning Commission recommended approval of modifications to Special Permit SP05-098 for additional accessory structures on the Moore Mansion property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: 1. That Brad and Debra Peck are hereby granted a modification of Special Permit SP05-098 to permit additional accessory structures on the Moore Mansion property under Master File # SP 2015-015 with the following conditions: a) The special permit shall apply to parcels # 119430241, 119430205 and 119430278; b) The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan submitted with the special permit application; c) The new carriage house and storage sheds must compliment the Neo - Classical design of the Moore Mansion including the use of similar siding and roofing materials; d) The Special Permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit to begin construction activities authorized under Master File # SP 2015-015, by February 28, 2017. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this I" day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 131 of 252 Vicinity Item: Moore Mansion Special Permit Applicant: Brad & Debra Peck Map File #: SP 2015-015 .-SV E S_T_E. YL , I - l VUNIG 5;f I �I 1 a r � �6 SIT C ---- o f-------------------- 4 -a W e�. N O (Jl N REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2015-015 HEARING DATE: 12/17/2015 ACTION DATE: 1/21/2016 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: Brad & Debra Peck 200 Road 34 Pasco, WA 99301 Modification of a Special Permit Issued Under Adaptive Reuse of Historic Places Provisions Lam: Parcels #119430241, 119430205 & 119430278: A portion of the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 25, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M.; General Location: 200 Road 34, Pasco, WA 99301 Propertv Size: Approximately 283,140 square feet or 6.50 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Hopkins Drive. 3. UTILITIES: The site is served by municipal water and sewer. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 (Low -Density Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned as follows: NORTH: RS -12 - Single -Family Homes SOUTH: NA - Columbia River EAST: RP - Highway & Mobile Home Park WEST: R-1 & RS -12 - Vacant & Single -Family Homes 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for low-density residential uses. Applicable Plan goals or policies include ED- 1-D and LU -6- A. These goals and policies encourage the promotion of tourism and recreational uses associated with the River and the restoration and use of historic structures. Specifically policy LU -6-A encourages the permitting and reuse of historic structures "which may include more intensive activity than the surrounding properties if adverse impacts on the neighboring properties are mitigated" for the purpose of preserving community history and enriching the community. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. Page 133 of 252 HISTORY In the fall of 2005 the owner of the Moore Mansion was granted a special permit under the adaptive reuse of historic places provisions of the Zoning Code (PMC 25.86.025) authorizing the use of the Mansion property for weddings, wedding receptions, family reunions and other similar special events (MF# SP 05-098). The 2005 special permit was the fifth in a series of special permits that have been granted to owners of the Moore Mansion. Previous special permits authorized the operation of restaurants, wedding receptions, banquets and bed and breakfast activities on the Mansion property. During the early part of 2014 the Planning Commission issued an administrative interpretation of Special Permit SP 05-098 to allow construction of a 2,400 square - foot carport structure because said Special Permit did not specifically authorize any additional structures on-site. This application is the second to modify Special Permit SP 05-098. ANAT.VSiR This application involves adding several accessory structures together with modifying and relocating one existing accessory structure on a historic site known as the Moore Mansion. A supplemental project description submitted by the applicant explaining the proposal in detail is included herein as Exhibit "A". This application includes permitting a variety of accessory structures cumulatively exceeding the floor area and height limits listed under R-1 zoning provisions regulating the site. Secondly, the request involves making modifications to an existing carriage house structure which is non -conforming in terms of height. Lastly, the applicant requests permission to construct a new 4,000 square foot, 25 -foot tall carriage house beside the Moore Mansion; thereby establishing three dwelling units on the Moore Mansion property. Under the current zoning the property could be subdivided to permit the development of at least 30 single-family dwellings. In reviewing the details outlined below, it may be useful to know that the footprint of the Moore Mansion including all of its first floor appurtenances is 3,630 square feet in size. Carriage House In the southwest corner of the property there is a two-story building, referred to as the carriage house, consisting of a garage on the first floor with a residential apartment above. According to the Franklin County Assessors records this building has a footprint of 665 square feet. Staff estimates the height of this structure to be approximately eighteen (18) feet as measured to the mid -point of the roof, which is the method Pasco uses to regulate structure heights. 2 Page 134 of 252 The owner proposes to demolish the garage and foundation while retaining the second -story dwelling unit for reuse elsewhere on-site. Two alternate locations for said new building are indicated as "A" & "B" in the full color site plan included in Exhibit "A" NPm Rhk-dc The property owner is proposing to locate four additional portable storage sheds on the site. The sheds are designed to be moved to accommodate different events. Each shed is proposed to be 200 square feet in floor area; for a total of 800 square feet above the approximately 4,033 square feet of accessory structures currently on-site. The exterior design and height of these sheds was not specifically addressed in the application materials. However, the applicant has indicated to staff the moveable sheds will be constructed to compliment other structures on the site. Living Quarters In place of the carriage house proposed for demolition and relocation, the property owner plans to construct a new two-story building (Carriage House) having a residential apartment above a first floor garage. The application indicates the new building may be up to 4,000 square feet and twenty five (25) feet in height. Architectural features of the building will be designed to match or compliment the Beaux-Arts (neoclassical) style of the Moore Mansion. A draft elevation illustrating the proposed design and treatment of the proposed apartment is included on the last page of Exhibit "A". Zoning Regulations: For the Planning Commission's reference staff offers the table below comparing some applicable R-1 zoning regulations to details of the applicant's proposal. R-1 ZoninLy ReLyulations Structure Type Maximum Limits Proposal Detached Garage Floor Area 1,000 ft2 6,400 ft2 Detached Garage Height 15 feet 25 feet Shed Floor Area 200 ft2 2,233 ft2 ** Shed Height 15 feet Unknown/TBD Cumulative Floor Area 1,200 ft2 8,633 ft2 * Figure represents the existing carport (2,400 ft2) and the proposed carriage house (4,000 ft2). ** The existing gazebo (768 ft2), the historic guest house to be relocated (665 ft2) and an existing picnic shelter (200 ft2) (the applicant plans to remove the shelter) have been accounted for in the category of shed floor area. 3 Page 135 of 252 To protect against residential sites from becoming dominated by structures dedicated to uses other than habitable living space and to achieve a decided urban form PMC 25.70.030 contains the following provisions: 25.70.030 ACCESSORY BUILDINGS. Accessory buildings shall not be permitted on a parcel prior to the existence of a principal use. The following standards shall apply to all accessory buildings in residential districts: (1) Roofing materials must be compatible and similar in relation to the primary structure; and (2) Exterior siding must be compatible and similar in relation to the primary structure. (3) In no case shall a detached garage have more square footage than the principal building and shall not be higher than the principal building. To ensure the intent of the provisions above are met the list of tentative approval conditions contains a condition requiring specific compliance therewith. Mitigating factors supporting approval of the special permit include the following: - The site contains 6.50 acres. - There are no neighbors to the south and east of the site. The River is to the south and SR 395 is to the east. - All proposed structures will be 300 feet or more from the north property line and Hopkins Street. - Including the additional structures added to the site, lot coverage will only be 4.5%. - In the R-1 zone lot coverage can be up to 40%. If the 6.50 acres was subdivided in to 7,200 square feet lots the coverage would be far greater than what the applicant is proposing. - If subdivided under the current zoning the site could accommodate 30 single-family dwellings and associated out buildings such as garages, shops and sheds FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned "R-1" (Low -Density Residential); the R-1 zone is a single- family residential zoning district. 2. Surrounding properties are zoned "RS -12" (Suburban). 3. The 6.50 acre site contains the historic Moore Mansion. 4 Page 136 of 252 4. The Moore Mansion is the only privately owned and finance property in Pasco included on the National Register of Historic Places. S. The zoning regulations permit the adaptive reuse of historic structures through approval of a special permit (Master File# SP 05-098). 6. The Moore Mansion has been granted four previous special permits for the operation of restaurants, wedding receptions, banquets and bed and breakfast facilities. 7. The R-1 Zone permits detached residential garages up to 1,000 square feet in floor area and up to fifteen (15) feet in height. 8. The R-1 Zone permits shed cumulatively not to exceed 200 square feet in floor area and up to fifteen (15) feet in height. 9. The current application proposes to construct and additional 4,800 square feet of accessory structures. 10. The site currently contains accessory structures amounting to 4,033 square feet in area. 11. The 3,630 square foot Moore Mansion is the primary structure on-site. The Mansion is approximately forty (40) feet in height. 12. The site currently contains two dwelling units. 13. The application involves constructing a 4,000 square foot accessory dwelling unit twenty five (25) feet in height. 14. The application proposes to construct four (4) new 200 square foot sheds; totaling 800 square feet in area. 15. The existing detached carriage house is an historic structure that will be relocated and preserved on-site. 16. Highway 395 borders the east site of the property, separating activities on the Mansion property from residential land uses to the east. 17. Highway 395 generates highway noise. 18. The Moore Mansion property contains three parcels totaling 6.50 acres of land. 19. The Moore Mansion is located over 700 feet from the nearest house. 20. Receptions and weddings can generate the need for considerable parking and items requiring storage such as tables, chairs and various decorations. 21. The Moore Mansion site has one and one-half acre set aside for parking. 22. Overflow parking in the past has been accommodated on the expansive lawn area. 5 Page 137 of 252 CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 and determine whether or not the proposal: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Applicable Plan goals or policies include ED -1-D and LU -6-A. These goals and policies encourage the promotion of tourism and recreational uses associated with the River and the restoration and use of historic structures. Specifically policy LU -6-A encourages the permitting and reuse of historic structures "which may include more intensive activity than the surrounding properties if adverse impacts on the neighboring properties are mitigated" for the purpose of preserving community history and enriching the community. The purpose of this application however, relates to the addition of accessory structures which support the previously authorizes land use activities. Besides the Plan policies mentioned above, the nature of this proposal is not otherwise specifically addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The site is presently served adequately with water, sewer and other municipal utility facilities. The City's major West Pasco sewer interceptor parallels the Mansion site. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The general character of the neighborhood is residential. The general look and character of the Moore Mansion is that of a residential estate. The proposed use will continue the residential estate character. New construction will be conditioned to comply with accessory structure regulations contained in the Zoning Code (PMC 25.70.030) to ensure consistency amongst the structures on-site. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof The Mansion itself stands approximately forty (40) feet in height. The location and height of the Moore Mansion were established in 1908. While considerably larger than surrounding structures, as it currently exists the Mansion is located on an expansive tract with considerable setbacks not creating any bulk or density concerns. C Page 138 of 252 (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Land use activities of the site have previously been authorized pursuant to Special Permit SP 05-098 and are not the subject of the application at hand. It is unlikely that the addition of the proposed accessory structures will significantly alter the nature of activities conducted on-site although enhancing the level of service for the venue could lead to an increase in the number of events held. Impacts generated by on-site events have been addressed in the conditions set forth in the 2005 Special Permit. The addition of an accessory residential dwelling unit will come after the existing carriage house is relocated. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The Moore Mansion was located and developed in its present location in 1908. It has been used as a restaurant and reception -center though the issuance of special permits over the last 15-20 years with minimal impacts to the neighborhood. It is unlikely that adding several accessory structures on the Moore Mansion property will present any potential detriment to public safety. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to parcels #119430241, 119430205 and 119430278; 2) The site shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan submitted with the special permit application; 3) The new carriage house and storage sheds must compliment the Neo - Classical design of the Moore Mansion including the use of similar siding and roofing materials; 4) The Special Permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco building permit to begin construction activities authorized under Master File # SP 2015-015, by February 28, 2017. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Brad & Debra 7 Page 139 of 252 Peck for the modification of a special permit issued under the City of Pasco Municipal Code Adaptive Reuse of Historic Places provisions at 200 Road 34, Pasco, WA 99301 (Parcels # 119430241, 119430205 8s 119430278) with the conditions as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. k' s Page 140 of 252 Vicinity Item: Moore Mansion Special Permit Applicant: Brad & Debra Peck Map File #: SP 2015-015 .-SV E S_T_E. YL , I - l VUNIG 5;f I �I 1 a r � �6 SIT C ---- o f-------------------- 4 -a 0 N Land Use Item: Moore Mansion Special Permit Applicant: Brad & Debra Peck Map File #: SP 2015-015 SinLyle-Family Residences Kir"Iq HCl Vacant Mobile Home - 6 Park Columbl�\ ���r Zoning Item: Moore Mansion Special Permit MApplicant: Brad & Debra Peck x ap File #: SP 2015-015 RS -20 (Suburban) lug RS -12 Suburban RS -20 'Col "mbl R-1 C_1 61 C-3 C-3 RP idential Park) Hopkins St C 3 .�.4 IIII I r OFF .t VON . yIF a, 0 FI IF j• _. � ^y, \ryya 1i ti• 1 A•�','v ..,,1 1� )" �Y. yea ti i- ` .to 'l t Of FIB 4 IwoY� r x I .v FAR sj ,� �y . 1 TA IF r FFW IF f �.IF I-IFIFF all .�IF - •� ;FN VN I IV >;IFFIFF Vol `� A. �s lMI X _�I� 11 1 :�;,1% r r kr f I i y or - OF .1 ' an 4.o )I+n..dn .(Y YTwr:x (T" c rcP, inAiY Ft :� F FF a y .. �:7a1 I C• tt c Ft r r� �.'. - ,. r rpt , pop 3 . , IF 463 . I i � ,.!� �.. ap if. —.r' 'tpip ' IN —1`r 'Y J -F s• lk'Fir A -i' l 4 x a 1 X7i• CRS ' 3 or yM• �I IF•ricw`' It : -t _>'d,• .. til:.. _ry ^. n- �I�I:�I�iM \[t tJI 412&C _ 4 C4Lpt w .. r IF I m ':°sIF p , M1 `IF :.Fe 10 1 Its - . Y`•� t \h S4 >?• r,1Y'' i=F,/�J-i . ,r1 e_ x.1:�+L: .:�.. .rte, .. l tt ^ei II v t. h . 3 rtc � . v , ,r GtIAPOP Yrr ivM � in r 1 •t. go ,FLI or 11 t Fit r IF A IN IIF F It ; 'i PAWS= OFF d• a — • FFFFFI Y For 3 A W FFoc T_ V IF MI r0.yomw IF Aw w. - FIN It IF Fok r IF rFFI F, ry 'r t - JIB.' "41, IF wlye2vA �IlpiO IN, FO 1 \ e - y•,� 'tt 4 ! AV . 412&C _ 4 C4Lpt w .. r IF I m ':°sIF p , M1 `IF :.Fe 10 1 Its - . Y`•� t \h S4 >?• r,1Y'' i=F,/�J-i . ,r1 e_ x.1:�+L: .:�.. .rte, .. l tt ^ei II v t. h . 3 rtc � . v , ,r GtIAPOP Yrr ivM � in r 1 •t. go ,FLI or 11 t Fit r IF A IN IIF F It ; 'i PAWS= OFF d• a — • FFFFFI Y For 3 A W FFoc T_ V IF MI r0.yomw IF Aw w. - FIN It IF Fok r IF rFFI F, ry 'r t - JIB.' "41, IF wlye2vA �IlpiO IN, FO 1 \ e - y•,� 'tt 4 ! AV . 14 11 1 1 roll I Nor �l �))�rr �� i �Q�A j V },, iAi ..I 113ai.� •6r.� �� r _��s�Ir'y�. +.� ft If ",r I pro 1 1 I r r4/f 'Al r��j�"�. 1r�1� \\ �.i • :F '' rfl� 1t fj 4 'fILA rlI, AN =.r !. tr trot I rJf 'k LONItI A FAA Fit lam r i' rZ fit: ft L>4 ��y,� ";A Ap :.. 0.l, rvl �1 AT d '' 'aIN . {, ':< i .. r ! /'rm _ ,: r+`Q�et ! �� ?bb� jlffi`t /r r `,,(1�'!1i�'�•- ; 1'� .''. I^ iC� . J..* R. \ 4 y� �` VIA a►��+'.,5 111 ' '' ,w, r yyi�� e,1 4 , i l . A h'�' t.d'/ I Ad �" ' 11, I , 61 :1 ' j: 1� ' �� , illi �' \r,J�,IyJ> $;�'. r'y�.i d/ liy;y� i �1 ��'+� i'; 1'C' �► / „ , . ;t i it,6 r '�Q�Yt ` t OAF A \ ��� \� ``All bb/til zt4./` r r"it d, al i IF r <• ,1`!� t t•,1 r I�' t ,i �'i f. r _ .rf v OMPPI '' I' ,/ t� `!LL I �'tsJ4�. 1 �v �� i�'ti1E' ��1' I� •�f ` ,1.� �� r " a / "At 'JR.t:• .r! �:tr� 1� �� ' t. 7•+�i16�" 4?t i iq;,? ; I J711) J:y , `I#/ y -FILL!' ,7J ��-;! •\ `:,1 / ��a�i to �1`� -. i'L$i , �TFc ip: ..��}'1yf®'�j%'. v.e��p+� rll�jl� f 1� ��s 1. F"- .1byAd r r r- •i Jr�; �aN ±^ 7 twi IN`�1f%'; v,yj 1 \���. �irArt I I�';�'I•7�il `,b)r QI ''�j1 i, `,�. - ` _ ANN am Air i•! -• J`F i d �aii; \ ,r V�. �i" .�i � f/�1•PJ ! ir: v.�1.1ifG� , f It. `r r o; rl' 1:: J�a�il' f' S' I /pt \• ��. c+� ,• .iIlLll �,lr r�l ±':,:1, yyL��,,r hr�"vS,v.+�*1, ��.�'�}i}R ^ '� r, 'TyL t�_ - / It, IN Frio NINE r f'�•'• .•t - v(. r•.. T ,� r. i y1` , 'i'l. i7• 'F* 1. �' a/'2a, "I , .ii:^AN 1 �. All (; ' _,�'t'"a c., - i`:: ♦ .! I 't Ir�r• _'� dI r 51R ', �I" r 1 _ S,i. ry•,'v/lic, At Foo�, i.i f , IL VIA , k ,`'QI ' t 1, '� 1F'i.i.. .i•�.j' r• "o -r d, r,i ' r r f Ali- , '+ i r%." ' '!% � :IF . %i IN At I'ysi'. 7 _ »i t N , _ •.� ,p ALAN I ',i� /: i i+I�r,ll.Yi,'�S YI It� �:,rL,�\ T',,�,.iE r;l,c 6' , lis` Aim I Fit, Fr 9 0 '. �r� /'is 1% t( _S+ f ± n �•��y�"i 4 .d '•Ad F.,IN LIM -3\Amm:v' 1� 1. i...j`{'(✓tNr A "k!.F.t4..,w R�. Yt'f, aj \� qL, i fF s , t h�.: f _ r, -!s .'S';? At •• ._ ANNt - - iS 9 ,1' ,{d N i'• 1 '. •I l : ! - is i -r , I /fu; \ AN Iv Yi►� qL� _ .�V 5A. ., II 1 1•�•F tS' ��' • SJF^'l`• p �iit F h� n, ,� ery -' �!'a sY.,�—s.l a+++66�,�.!,:$' 1 `,u N r'rtd' ' <'/4t�..' E ��Cn..7�. ' 1I ejr...A,:yl$r V •i//of j Aid'i'il iT,; l'_i �� -{< Jy..'/Al - `��r '. -, ■ —` _Ad + !�" �•1 Lit AN )l .p5 r,.'�'p �it'F,`A , I if h, r, 6.,C ''ys,/1 .r, ' )�., I' t 'L;' AN I ' t;i Y';' All AN - _ -161, -.ILL..� f'd+ ' ..,..- > 'moi. yy.r��\ _ �'. + ,AN I. �. }toi ('\ Y Y (_i _.f i; •;. `v: 'f a% �''. liF S•py Sy •� I -I 13IV ! /'1'i, ','r 'v '7 •� - _>t1��'• } "` w - <�. ':h:'' , r i L0..:i: r, '!: ''�.Y%f4'II ��Sh 1'- ' - ''. .�2 •'N'�~,. 'L. -.� p < _ NII _s. E .,.e- uE �a Y, 1 r .. v, ,e 9e: t ,NI 1 r, r'- - S = -ANN III •:'�` �..., '-• �.` �L$ : V d;Yr Mae Al Ac'r..A• ' . I .Nor e ` t"" .''_- ,'.a.,_1':`,I' ILI;t,. ,. tis"��•� -�' ` -^'i x,, ;"$` ;� yr�i. �+ r,�.r^,.- i' - L_ >. +f gra. _ .s' :. ��`itff J"'a„-.pp,.�i-I'VO r r;r'.i/V' C., l 4; _ 3 ., �t!'F _ �� - - 4 ,4a1i' GAIL ,.,� .. a` - �!+•^` 14 `c'.q5... i. v. sn.. y� \ 14'va 'q. t,J,(�. I, :.Jr' i' 4.' 7 !••S - _ i , 'FAA AN',.ILIA- i _ L $t^ _ 'dj'r :)r �.. �,� !' . a t i:Jf 1�.. r' ,:•c-�!I_oAr yj�� /r . �, ;A�" Al '� ;.' '1-cu'6{ •`a— •. Ad Art o' S r. 'rrr. •. i✓.•� `F ` t, fir' - - _ s_ S'�ei} v.c. .'l. �r u>.W.` _.�. .a. ``+J .•7 Y„Yr.i. ,_ - \'�I �v. ,Ir/Y• `al `' :'w^_.:L��r.`.�".'� ..Ts1 ,�'.,% -- yQ,w,;r� ;"'', •`.., .aY_ �' A :i '11-'s ' ..L.E._;. /„•,' - / y�Kt wt�,•. `\�4 .ry ( '-'. '-�' *`y �•. r ?.iP� Alli..a ''--s1Ti+.s �.�.. .'j7 ��f�'il L+y�.. ,,p[�-',E.� ll .ol ; ✓., AN For _����, �:yo7�. n o s: Ali.. '�- "e.' _ 1� r��l .c.�tiR, } a .:•%r ��'� ¢+ IF r:;yy!�1FLAN r --s- - ,� 1 �`'a _P �j '} stir'„ s° ;: ”; , rs,-A n ' ,'r*'sa�.t rs •n.� - "I.,Jdf. T-:'jlb- _ _-..' lam''_ a,r .I^ 11 f a ;- , ,I �:', .'r.`. .9 - „r 1. \ `. ..n - _ [ +G'r •, , �G r ,4i _ a A AIM VAN � 4 _ i ' J - _ - !Y Nowi _ \• 3 het ity I X. •, § i;•�! AN r �l APAl �. 1 __� ) ^_r wi z t 4 k'� , .ZOilALLAll �_� _ • ,/ �.® = •t t _ `r�:L x. I'. _ -.s Tc' fh"/1.� Ii ��-�_ p '%,yy �y . 'ir . I/AN A� a` - - \ \ vi r1 i r'� %j �t --- Ali ,? _ILI-Ar 6� LIAL _ _ Am P AN \ a pow / JL N ALL Ar. AIN All IA A t Lop" All I IF JA NIL i "t I"j -�_ r� IN / \ 1 _Fdt If I Ad 10 5 "Art > ^7 LA_{'4AN A 11 IN All A F III AN All Ad I ' ' �!a- ILI AN AM A r Lop L4 LIN At �iP i 'lir_ , e - -_ _. ' Sri • t "- 'i•�FL I AN rfi •!.' �t « :Art ,F »All } - - All,al .. _ c AM c _ .vr P >:.'w t ,i �'i.•'sx. ._ ,nv +tr_ r ^V • .�., >nro, + \ , 4 4• t{ ,f - o.> - -y ? -I No -i:VAL A .y,fix ANAI'(f.ltl"y G.r, _ }moi ''� �+ i' - -��-_— - Z y A�l%A Ar t_� 1br .r J♦. 5M` _ :4=i,.' :a .�'�.. ,F/-�'' ,r '•y. •� 7, d': •fit: ,LI �.)ffe •i'S. j"'�.��� ,N ' T/.. _ >. �V Y. a._;f, ...i. , -l' , t A' - H.0 ti o, -).- .��^c .� / i , AL +f`- - .i ti,J .r.W. i' .rS, .s +,err -L t"•- fyf'- :n: -t-'4: •.- 'YIF ar, - .�. '" =r� +} 3s., ,e iF,• Yv^ .. ,.�; ..v rs �,R. .) ,...i .^YJ v '/? :. - i • .. . f, d+ti _. _ k. `E .�'• • .� T;Y . r ?.i'{+� "�Y t. " `� >i ,?T aa. e-:, �J : .,• .- 'c'. r- , -a. �' ., 4;n• ;1 1 9-"�'a- �>?s. ,.. ,, .t � �'. ec_ ,5 ate , s .,� _ ., - - A,` F ,h r, ,, ,J 'Tnr :�'.. ;t?•. ,,.i' T -S :i.., ..ate r 1. �C°k7o „^.-.meq . - S;i - ,p - a"+• r F ;.� , R r• ..+iY ,G .:� i Aj„� : 1r. r.P• •. ...+1,x',3 R -,-'!'.\Ii'. 4 ,ti:u - ;t .}'� - - 'e..' L'': NARA ~ .P'. _ ..lY '!u: ., A' J f, ,,,'i. r...� Y, [r'v } ws.P: \..,I of A AN=i • y. %`, . , k • t , �, a.• M. 'r Fit -1�. i. A,r, Y;,� 'tom! F' .��< �, , ,' <' '�w 1, i ^ `y •• - k .� w„t_+. A ,.a, 'yyi .F. 1 ,V S” 1' , �y "''G-i^•.'a f” g. i 'r.. `•`�• , - AN .4' r+Y; `rk. '? N �, 'i n ��' .ti'IY' .. I7 J,,"V �I .i ?tea AI 40% Fr lk At At IN Not Its tet'.v7 :,.^ . 11 ., 1, 4.,For A AAe t �� .0 v r • cr+.�.4h .3' - <1 * ;•7' I £:.� 1' '�- ,rUll J .Mlrb/.d 1� �'.t 1, I'r,•e y Q `,.a.:. p. .r Ii_. �A •7�y�� - •, ''[•d -", '' .t "I t i ,11:. •1� a. .(1r .`, a r' lZm . 1i '',� :i ;.,rLP Y,� t 1TeIr J i. j'7 rvlti)� :` P • r Ad a ��•' • ; �' ryi'i� FV C.r�'�`'' fr.t ^� i'tk ui' i fir, ����;r� tf yU'Ar 01RIs�!l�•rC a - v. r , r A A i 7 c r 1 e '� z P �, 7 k ! , 1 a. ! f + r .W t T 7 t Ir « !. y i 4 Pf! r --',+.'t i ,�`f ` iL+ i.., � 'I'4i ,.. f� 'si li .//;; � ; p�py' - ',�y.' i 'a� i✓?".�.��:rt. A' - "1 i lJ /niC Vol oft, All / t �i/Ti(rjI , L t rs l:.' - A. �...,V y- 1- f oft, �Q, ,-yec .r!! s,a . f .r. �•, 7P t VI 4 tlJ IF . I . "t _` d� .SC �Ail ii1 F.. s ll � 1 i. b"' .1' 7 Ilk ¢ ;.1' �9 v v' T. 1$,r .rr, .�► if IN a �a 1 ^.'e P I .air .i I • \ '+. .' s `iNJ.. ilkoI do Ned LA 01 It 11 4.4 old If \\ _ 1 \. - If\ , .8! AT." ll rF9 IAi94 :III'y!1'�+� 11v !— - r15rJ[�,l. HCl if .,_. '�,I?' 1 y 1 ., 1 .wry- ; �. .i. .,.A rs' y '� "kI p..,.�2, f.� �Iq M +x I/.� !. lop�jt n at,A�Y + tl Ir,'L . - ,� �� •'. [ +l v'Z '....r r "` `i k.• 1,r ivi k S,' 'n '1 ,l Ike r J rryy�y-0I•�yj '1 '.�'#c- ffi'r �yp(' �' 1r Pr.. JoI V% :LtJ%�+' �\ 4 • 'fl e p •'—i11'� I� 1• jp —M= r _!'. 1 ! �Ybt/rii�l w. r vts. i _ .` ._A," TIFF JIM, C .. y� 1 f 1' l j' _ T'+ I I' � x /1 y SION _ 1 f y I 1, r r d' IN, k4}do 11 �i 1 i,J I 111!4 fit 4 rr., e li r 1 it rY,lrt �r� Ilk P 11..r: �Owl e1, r N. IN op aa:%ip I Nor No op kr�-,: A6 P16. q' ,� IN 7 7r i�o � "„ '. fig It 4' �, ,.i}� _ tt l� : I.. �li�t 3l � }.'� /:..n 11 IN lop 'r l4. Ir 'y 011 e 6 Ili No. r••A r y .,1. ' l .3z {.A*.j lli. ' w1k`$1N'0!NAilIi'����''�hild;l�i%�!1`x �.WV,i`� i '..s% I , pq I. yly. 1 JZ t •i y -y ,.� r il'''k If fly& If '3 - ' -oaf 7,1:•,i.� At Toot t-y�"t" rI 41100 or %lS flog IT If If AOL xge' WL III ga} ����_� f^�off r _TV If lim If LLPolo To? �s I � w ra R j IF We: I LL Jog' A ,r �W All • `e fie]:�IaFS -awf ►�1�''rf�� .`1��'r �eFy'�7r�t Y� IV, �� r _' �/117C�i1 v 8 F r w r ITT If to vp yof r It 89 .� West Iq. �t I.�r. -� AlA►em) I �... ,-. ai IlIMM.III . I or a atIt 14 r♦ It Ift Y`ITT, I r w + lIf �°�ofr. t dltW�,.y'� IT i? 1 1IT1n 1 -I I_ImTI I IT I - r:� v AL , 111. I low {�, n , v —owls R ' R r -b ♦ It If 1-41 PIP c foilL''a. > 1 I - i J ` Of IT 1%lz S 1 L <If 0 ;4 \_ If °Ift T VITT rI tic: x; If w.•r - - \ 1 - na If 4w t It VIL I, A I I,*Los s a1 04 ' . 'ITIT wwww _ r`r ,'Pitt, h + 7�P•:��fit 7 .r Ohl 1't"+�'\i�•1 "r1'tTi-` �.. ', t 1, l: s te Too w lot v - t Larc i 114 1 If Bij do AA. I lr jIt I�� AL r , (±, 14) ,, L �1 A g' v IT, e. k \ Tog fr mot r. lot It a �-,��pJ1 -�`' iP�`' hal{ �.�oa - �� w \ �\ \',. '•,` -11 r. to e♦ 1 I ti. IT It % 4241P 1 it it It .< r � : 1M gooll ,;.Lo h 1 1A a IT T °a.�Talk to lot 4 �'�_Y Gy�m ' +♦� »�-` }. , IF , got TV P. 1►1�° • To w n l 4t I it r••y��`[lJY4 \, ^-th,jes it 41 I AN 11 *4 ' ✓J+�'.�Y Aj���11Y1i• i/� 0 S^it. No I I NO IN Tells In 1 11 NII IV t '1 11 ', ♦, b` r ..,��� ♦ ;"�i. .I Y YAC #�YTAT All, A. Am on 10 0 f VAN l T�' do AN ;> _ Ali 1 y,', IT AN AT Nino IN TV AN kill, •'� „ qVOL III AN AN p . sa' �'!' I 'A��'" ��rr,�rs `r.. ✓ '}!i ' S'�sV•r ANTI ASCII N I An Vol If W IN Vol tior Home tinety ow OAN IMMAPTIT 94IS p v E ;Y `" G ► �" . Ton gq° is To 1.14 VANsr: TT I AN wC s:` +rx•;� . OP mo,t 77 _ rTI � �. L �.Gr After op, Toll Toll - - ,'' ,� C:<.� 'a' -tel moi' '�.' _ _, , ' 1.+ _ _.'? IN AT- oI jo NI _ ..T 'Now. - - �Ali . .ateVAN _ _ n _ _ ' _ - T utrb 'tAN - S.. J.. AVIIt-a - -� - e r' + : '.� 9�s _Awln� ''l .1 INois _' s. s '_ Y fir T7'� - • ?7 'YIR. Val; AN _ IN Nor t S _ .��_�. . T -�_ _ I , . IML '� .� 4��'.AK� It lk a _� _�_ _: _ - ,. s - �-}Tla-"110 .l �!►C 1 1 Monti•���.' 'T1Tr'�� _ _ v-.•�Tx r �7, - _ _ _ - - _ _ ow _ .Yr+ -•-ice+ r.,TIC w "-. a LIII No 11 I IT IT ITT IT In on VI TAFT MIT ON A!1bx �i _- µAN NI a — , -FF o- _IN Vio,a F ITT IT mpv� AT IT Nil TV or AT dd I motir Am, Ter V Pi IT I in Aw = To IT A,IT 411 A,yNote ol't + ld� ITT .. _ _ - INT,- - ` a Anion a. r •-ad}" ` �N,� : - I j ii _ APTI - 10- so Nor y- w. — _ -'� - - ,. _ _Air OF AI INA I AN •` _- ip 77 s i '1 oil - _ v jJ- Am CIA_ Alf, Ali I IV an. -VIA ol, AT V L: lN AT rtIn ..�sr 11' - _ -� --- r' 1cn'� 1 _ _ -:---4'�S 1\ .F. "An I III t . E� .N, '- ti fz A '♦' P"` . .. .._al + �t rtr i;ari ,' _�. �!� `r j 3.-�"Poin _ _ ••teINVa •� TI V! Ami v- NOTTe I ToIf J, -of I .- _"r -r "_ id Nil "T J'e oniz IT It _^�Z s-:� o _• ,-_.�'�c a -:AI. IL "AlloAlto7or I to T ITA V IN MIN TL III No p, .. t - _ .- - `'" �` d:- G' —.I"�- ' A. -_E > 'r t i r 'A* , T IT NAT, A- r Anion s .i1 r ,� •. to, { ts,on on Vol s' 'A-aF fir= a ` I IN,' rTom IN A A ITT s No R "IT s •�•f� •INTI Ar ate in -• .A + �n - 1 - - ,Fr r -7r �� 'g' ti-< h :"C: _ _ ,.• � _ '� �rr ssnt IT r too I r 1AN I JF` M -T, Arl Point "A Oft A. �► _ }�• INa IN AN l'r Maj moi{. lN1tFPE=_Am age Ati, % A' AT rood:,,f: w)r ,yft . s �y iP4 Vol I }yTIN . t r a .� w An �II aft 1�1}.1u k'{k a r E SS r i�.t'`•r�' 41 r"`f`•'.j%� ♦ 1• ''� ,. t AM- �'�''Al ♦ ? \ •.,' „_{ , . IT .� i% yp- Sgt A •r.., ;R - i •Y y Ila Iw.c At NI-- Not "l, �'' I�•� �'-1. / - y R�e r$IN I `} To t •r `rl !F ' - ! AM y J / • ri7 ` I III I AN.fh1T � v� �• ? -. t L •\ r < �`,•i i , F ! .. ., T ^ �• + w .wr"F-`"1• • ^`�'Caa..,a.;; tT A&'yy�y�RR�1 1An, ', el 1,t • �''r , .r T.,'7 ♦ + K. In 't tires{'a66 ow TL { A AN No I -ma y. A - ,1 A to IV :; + 11 11 I FA IN -• 4!• J �' 11 All, � It Ali y QE.NL `r 'fit m. N ANN n� a , .••R a ..4 � 0 Y r^. - i T 'S r �v '� ' / • �v i ,may, J.♦►* ; v♦!; _\' i a Fit •:__..fir �` �1♦`AMAN 1101 Ni NV ALL aAt �q r Ad NL ., 1 1 Aw }FFAAN. Fort } _ .r ' ♦* p�i� , 1AbFQ L Avert IV : Vfw " f A AN P IV A, -11F 4\ I J _. -A I yet FAAA r if sINA n, 1 NINA t _ -` 4 �' - X33 i I - *i ti V- :L - I QzN5. AN— T a IT p Air N� Nor NAZI, At �� _ -• ,� -�� �:�{fid`.". - � ❑ .Sc I W AftAIR -AN A ,_ - -. 1AN Al r I Ft Y it`j 11 ...�.wlt{ `�• r% 1 .1 FINAL NI I FIFA icy\�cn''�',♦ +\ ate, 111 d t f e l S �ll f l r - ::.. -IN q µ d - ,IA 16 - _ - t , ♦ I 'I . H I - '1 eye .Yi! yd L i' d AV 1 ANNA, `:41 M•♦ ♦IN y; 41F Ao if _NVIr 1 ter. 3 -Yr a _ - .� rr'i ♦ 4^- stT " •r "{ .� r ..i �_ _ A 1 9 j� 4=X AV r =ep i ANN NV if all .S - < ✓t1 - AF I A, AF NAM 4,11111731F NO 9 AN` fir, - }: �� NO AN NFIL_AtFit AN 1 2 vit i tY1i? It �`�i 4lwn�ti:ui{I�a�_ ^.�'i'� 777 ttto 41 -FIF IV 6 FAR vIr AL FANN �i _ _a.l•S 6. i_4i..uR_. r 4 , . Y it`j 11 ...�.wlt{ `�• r% 1 .1 FINAL NI I FIFA icy\�cn''�',♦ +\ ate, 111 d t f e l S �ll f l r - ::.. -IN q µ d - ,IA 16 - _ - t , ♦ I 'I . H I - '1 eye .Yi! yd L i' d AV 1 ANNA, `:41 M•♦ ♦IN y; 41F Ao if _NVIr 1 ter. 3 -Yr a _ - .� rr'i ♦ 4^- stT " •r "{ .� r ..i �_ _ A 1 9 j� 4=X AV r =ep i ANN NV if all .S - < ✓t1 - AF I A, AF NAM 4,11111731F NO 9 AN` fir, - }: �� NO AN NFIL_AtFit AN 1 2 vit i tY1i? It �`�i 4lwn�ti:ui{I�a�_ ^.�'i'� 777 ttto 41 -FIF IV 6 FAR vIr AL FANN �i _ _a.l•S 6. i_4i..uR_. r i v CD N O N cn N 15, 26' 33, 3. 6' PORCH 943.2 sf ............ti 15' ry F 19' Z VZ STY FIN - MAIN 2463.8 sf GAZEBO 769.0 sf F4 24- �pl WD BLCNY 198.0 sf y L6, 1z, 12' L t6 2. 17' y WD BLCN'V _F 3. 276.0 sf 8. 2 112 STY FIN - UPPER Stairs IrF 1046.0 sf 6. 31 17' 41 ;., 61 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6. 10' 43' DECK 160.0 sf TOTAL BSMT AREA (sf) - RCP in 1376.0 sf 7' Shed 63.0 sf 2-41 7. 35' DET GRG 665.0 sf 35' .................................................. BNS RM OVR GRG PRT FIN 665.0 sf ................................................. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 12/17/15 D. Special Permit Modification of a Special Permit issued under adaptive reuse of Historic Places Provisions (Brad & Debra Peck) (MF# SP 2015-015) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Shane O'Neill, Planner I, discussed the special permit application for the modification of a special permit issued under the adaptive reuse of Historic Places Provisions. The request is to add more accessory structures to the Moore Mansion's site. The Moore Mansion site includes three separate parcels, approximately 6.25 acres in size. It is designated in the Comprehensive Plan for R-1 (Low Density Residential) uses. In 2005, the current owners were issued a special permit related to the use of the property, allowing them to hold events at this facility. Since that time, the special permit has been modified once to allow a large carport 2,400 sq. feet in size. The request involves the addition of four portable storage sheds, each no more than 200 sq. feet. The request also includes the removal of the carriage house structure and relocation to another location on site. Where the carriage house currently exists the applicant would like to build a new cartage house. The design features of the new structure will match the existing mansion in a neoclassical design. Staff prepared a table in the staff report comparing what the R-1 zoning allows and what the applicant is requesting. The application is requesting 7,400 sq feet more accessory structures than the R-1 zone permits, however, the site could be subdivided into a number of 7,200 square foot lots causing lot coverage to be even greater than the proposed application. Mr. O'Neill briefly discussed the conditions contained in the staff report. Commissioner Portugal asked for clarification about access to the property to the west side of the Moore Mansion. Mr. O'Neill responded that access is one of the constraints on the property and one of the reasons the site hasn't been developed already. Dave McDonald, City Planner, explained that the owners of the property to the west purchased the home directly south of Road 34 with the idea that the house could be removed and Road 34 could be extended south. At one time there was also an easement on two large lots off of Road 36 on Hopkins providing to the property. The property is zoned R-1 and doesn't have to go through a public hearing to be rezoned since it's already been rezoned. A public hearing is required to create a plat for the 30 lots. Brad Peck, 200 N. Road 34, spoke on behalf of his application. Chairman Cruz asked Mr. Peck to explain the plans for the property. Mr. Peck said that it is complex. This property has fallen in and out of care. He and 1 Page 154 of 252 his wife purchased the property in 2004 to keep it from being torn down. They needed a way to support the property instead of enriching the owners, which is why they created the event center. Event center funds are used to restore the property, not for income. They are at a point now looking into the future and economically it would make since to subdivide the property into lots and developed it with single-family homes. The alternative is to keep the property as is, protect the history and building, but add 6,000-7,000 sq feet of accessory structures that could support the business and property. He stated that this application is requesting more than might be developed but felt it best to ask for it now rather than coming back again later. The large accessory structure would serve three purposes; 1) ADA compliant restrooms, 2) Small room for changing and 3) Storage. Hosting events for hundreds of people requires several tables, chairs and linens that need to be stored. They've been storing those items in a trailer but it has been difficult and time consuming. On the second floor of the structure there would be plans for storage and living quarters to take care of the business. Mr. Peck addressed the comparisons in the staff report for what R-1 allows and what the application is requesting. He felt it was a bit of a misnomer since this could easily be zoned RS -12 or RS -20 that would allow significant garage space and since there are three parcels they could triple what those would allow. He explained the foundation on the carriage house was failing and cannot be saved. The building is currently braced but they want to preserve the history of the upper apartment that was built for navy fighter pilots so the plans are to build a new foundation at a different location on the property and move the old carriage house to preserve the history. He stated that they have run a responsible business over the years with only 2 complaints for noise and in both cases the noise wasn't actually coming from the Moore Mansion property but from a band playing in Columbia Park. Commissioner Portugal asked if Mr. Peck was a part of any partnerships with any historical preservation groups. Mr. Peck responded that the house is listed on the National Register of Historical Places, which was added in 1979. The directory credits the location as the birthplace of the Washington State apple industry and is also a unique history of neoclassical architecture. It is also recognized by the State of Washington as a historic property. But although it is on the registry, a private owner can still dismantle the property, however, it has been his choice to restore the property. Commissioner Mendez asked why it wouldn't be better to rezone the property so that the proposed accessory structures don't exceed what is allowed in the R-1 zoning. Mr. Peck stated that he consulted with the City Manager and Planning Staff and it was decided that it would make more sense to amend the existing special use permit. There is not a zone in the Pasco Municipal Code that fits this property. Regardless of the zoning, they would still have to get a special use permit. It is the only privately owned national registered property in the Tri -Cities. Chairman Cruz added that regardless of the zoning, there will have to be exceptions. The main thing is to maintain the historic nature of the property so it does not create an undue impact to the surrounding properties. 2 Page 155 of 252 Paul Miles, 3320 W. Hopkins Street, spoke on behalf of this application and for his wife and business partner. He stated that he is the neighboring property owner. He applauded Mr. Peck for ensuring the Moore Mansion is preserved and they don't have any problems with the use of that property. He did want to state for the record that his parcels are: 119-430-045, 119-430-250, 119-430-214, 119-302-032 and 119-430- 269. Their main concern is that just west of Mr. Peck's property is a co -easement at 119-430-278. Based on the ambiguity in the special permit, that easement would disappear and they would have a problem with that. They want to make sure the easement is preserved. Also, the existing building that is just west of the Moore Mansion, the carriage house, does not respect the setbacks. It was done prior to Mr. Peck but it is within a few inches of their property so they want to make sure that the setbacks are respected once a building permit is obtained to move that structure. Chairman Cruz asked for clarification on the location of the easement and existing structure inches from the property line. Mr. Miles referenced a map and explained where the property lines exist. Mr. McDonald clarified that the existing building, the carriage house with the garage underneath, will be moved. So when Mr. Peck applies for a building permit to relocate the structure he will be required to meet the minimum setbacks. The current issue will actually be resolved during the permitting process. Chairman Cruz addressed Mr. Miles' concerns that this is the time for him to speak into the record but all of his concerns will be handled by staff during the permitting process. Mr. Miles responded that as long as the setbacks are preserved and the easements are preserved then he wishes Mr. Peck the best of luck. Mr. McDonald addressed the easement concerns. The special permit application will not affect the underlying easement and the easement will be maintained. Nothing in the special permit process will do away with the easement. Commissioner Greenway asked Mr. Miles to clarify the property lines and who maintains the piece of land the cuts into Mr. Peck's property. Mr. Miles responded that at one point he fenced it but Mr. Peck asked for the fence to be taken down and he would maintain it and that was fine with both of them. Mr. Peck responded that the little piece of property belongs with their parcels, they fenced it, when the fence came down Mr. Peck has maintained it just as good neighbors. There aren't any concerns or issues there between them. The carriage house is currently too close to the setback but it is being relocated and when relocated they will have to adhere to the property setbacks. As for the easement, this process does not affect the existing easement. As for the little piece of property that juts into 3 Page 156 of 252 his, it is there because the previous owners were going to work together to develop a preliminary short plat and divide the area into small houses but was never approved or finished. That little piece was going to be a connecting driveway but is now left there. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Polk, to close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact and development of a recommendation for City Council for the January 21, 2016 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Peck asked a question about the process moving forward and the timeline. Chairman Cruz and Mr. McDonald stated to speak to staff during business hours. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1/21/16 D. Special Permit Modification of a Special Permit issued under adaptive reuse of Historic Places Provisions (Brad & Debra Peck) (MF# SP 2015-015) Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the modification of a special permit issued under adaptive reuse for Historic Places Provisions. There were no additional comments. Commissioner Bowers asked when the carriage house was built. Mr. McDonald stated that he was unsure of the exact date it was constructed but somewhere around 1914. Commissioner Bowers asked how many events per year are held at the mansion. Mr. McDonald was not sure how many events were held per year but they are mostly held in the spring and summer. Commissioner Bowers asked where the carriage house was located on this property. Mr. McDonald displayed on the site map where it is located. 4 Page 157 of 252 Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Portugal, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Portugal, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Brad & Debra Peck for the modification of a special permit issued under the City of Pasco Municipal Code Adaptive Reuse of Historic Places Provisions at 200 Road 34, Paso, WA 99301 (Parcels 119-430-241, 119-430-205 and 119-430-278) with the conditions as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. 5 Page 158 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit: WSU Farm in an R-12 District (MF# SP 2015-018) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Planning Commission Report Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 12/17/15 and 01/21/16 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , granting a special permit for a WSU Extension Services Farm in an RS -12 (Suburban Residential) District. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On December 17, 2015 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend the location of a WSU Extension Services Farm, located north of the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant and east of Road 111. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to recommend locating a WSU Extension Services Farm north of the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant and east of Road 111. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. V. DISCUSSION: Page 159 of 252 The proposed site, annexed in 2000, was in agricultural use since World War II until 2007 or 2009. Most recently the WSU Extension Services has been farming the property. WSU is seeking to expand the farm to use the entire 11 acres for low intensity farming. A storage shed and carport structure is proposed for a 1,800 square -foot fenced area north of the City's water treatment plant along the I-182 right-of-way. Page 160 of 252 • Item: WSU Farm in R- 12 Zone Vicinity • MapApplicant: City of Pasco N File #. SP 2015-018 5 v SGS SITE F 'V �r +k ...�J' it r`^ y • ,A.j�^ 'w/ .. t����' y � � ^. a' RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A WSU EXTENSION SERVICES FARM IN AN RS -12 (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco submitted an application for the location of a WSU Extension Services Farm located north of the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant and east of Road 111 (Tax Parcel 118 180 180); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 17, 2015 to review a special permit for the City of Pasco; and, WHEREAS, following deliberations on January 21, 2016 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Special Permit for the WSU Extension Services Farm with certain conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: 1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to the City of Pasco for the location of a WSU Extension Services Farm in an RS -12 (Suburban Residential) District under Master File # SP 2015-018 with the following conditions: a) The special permit shall apply to Parcel # 118 180 180; b) The proposed equipment storage yard and portable structures must be located north of the water treatment plant and at least 500 feet from Road 111; Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1St day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 162 of 252 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2015-018 APPLICANT: City of Pasco HEARING DATE: 12/17/2015 525 N 3rd Ave ACTION DATE: 1/21/2016 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: WSU Farm in an R-12 (Suburban Residential) District. Leal: Parcel # 118180180 being a portion of the NW quarter of Section 18, Township 9 North, Range 29 East located between Road 111 and I- 182 and north of Court Street. General Location: North of the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant and east of Road 111. Property: Approximately 11.41 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Road 111. 3. UTILITIES: The site has access to water, sewer, and power. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-12 (Suburban Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-12 - Vineyard EAST: R-12 - SFDUs SOUTH: R-12 - Treatment Plant and SFDUs WEST: RT - Vacant S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Low -Density Residential uses. None of the goals and policies of the plan apply to the proposed use. Farming activities with the Urban Growth Area are considered an interim use. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. Page 163 of 252 ANALYSIS The proposed site has been part of a farm since World War two. The farm was dissected in the early 1980's by the construction of I-182 and the bridge to Richland. However the property continued to be used as a farm after the highway construction. In 2000 the property was part of the Road 100 annexation and it became incorporated into the City at that time. The farm continued to be operated in the City until 2007 or 2009. Since that time there has been sporadic use of the land for farming. Most recently the WSU Extension Services has been farming the property. WSU is seeking to expand the farm to use the entire 11 acre parcel and incorporate a storage shed and carport structure to protect farm equipment. The storage structures and accompanying fencing will be located on the north side of the City's water treatment plant near the bike path along the I-182 right-of-way. The fenced equipment area will occupy about 1,800 square feet of land leaving most of the 11.41 acres available for farming. WSU typically grows vegetable crops on their research farms. WSU research farms are not intensive commercial farms involving a lot of heavy equipment and harvesting vehicles. For the last several years WSU has being farming two parcels of land near the corner of Road 80 and Wernett Road. The property has recently been sold and some of it is in the process of being developed as the Road 84 Estates. Staff is not aware of any complaints from nearby home owners as a result of the WSU farming operations on Road 80. CBC also operates an educational farm across the street from residential properties on Argent Place with nor complaints being generated by neighboring property owners. Pasco has had a long history with large and small farms being operated in the City Limits with little conflict with neighboring residential subdivisions. Farming is an interim use that can easily be converted to intended uses as urban growth dictates. Most of the development within the I-182 corridor over the past 15 years has occurred on lands that were formally developed with farms. WSU was asked to apply for a special permit because they proposed to modify the farming operation on the site by adding a carport and storage shed. There have never been any farm related structures on the property. INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 2 Page 164 of 252 1. The site has been farmed for at least 65 years. 2. The site was annexed to the City in 2000 and zoned RS 12. 3. The site is adjacent to I-182 a major highway. At times there is significant noise generated from the highway. 4. Farming operations continued on the site for 7 to 9 years after the site was annexed. WSU has recently being using the property as a research farm. 5. The residential neighborhood to the east of Road 111 was developed after the farming operation began on the site. Some of the houses in the neighborhood were built in the late 1990's and 2000's. 6. The WSU research farm cultivates vegetable crops. 7. A research farm does not involve the extensive use of large farm equipment and there is no commercial harvesting of the crops. 8. A small vineyard is located directly to the north of the proposed WSU farm. 9. The farming operation will include a 10' by 16' storage shed and a 30' by 40' carport to house farm equipment. The structures will be screen with fencing containing vinyl slats of a neutral color. 10. The proposed storage shed and carport will be located about 700 feet away from the nearest house on Road 111. 11. The proposed storage shed and carport will be located about 400 feet north of Court Street and will be screened from Court street by the masonry wall around the water treatment plant. 12. WSU has operated a research farm near the intersection of Road 80 and Wernett Road. This vegetable research farm has not generated any complaints from adjoin property owners. This property was in the County until the Road 80 Annexation occurred in July of this year. 13. The City Council granted a special permit to Columbia Basin College in 2009 for an education farm similar to the proposed WSU farm. The CBC farm is located on the north side of Argent Road across the street from single-family homes. The CBC farm has not created any nuisance problems for the residents on Argent Place. 3 Page 165 of 252 TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 and determine whether or not the proposal: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for low-density residential development. The proposed use involves no intensive development and is considered an interim use. The property will remain available for urban development. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed farm will have no adverse impact on public infrastructure. A farm is not dependent upon City utilities or infrastructure as are residential and commercial developments. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The location of other farms within the I-182 Corridor and other areas of the City has demonstrated that farms within close proximity of dwellings can be operated harmoniously with intended uses. Farms have operated simultaneously with the development of Island Estates, Sunny Meadows, the Village of Pasco Heights, and in harmony with other residential developments in the I-182 Corridor. The proposed use will not make intensive use of the land or lead to the disorderly growth of the community. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof The proposed structures will be similar to accessory structures typically found on residential lots. Development over the last 15 years within the I-182 Corridor attests to the fact that farming operations do not discourage the development of permitted uses or impair the value of nearby development. 4 Page 166 of 252 (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Nearby properties contain a water treatment plant, a vineyard a freeway and single-family homes. The proposed use will not create more traffic, flashing lights, fumes, noise or vibrations than the traffic on Court Street or I-182. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The existence of numerous farming operations within the I-182 Corridor demonstrates that the proposed use will not become a nuisance to permitted uses nor will it endanger public health and safety. TENTATIVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to Parcel # 118180180; 2) The proposed equipment storage yard and portable structures must be located north of the water treatment plant and at least 500 feet from Road 111; RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Washington State University Extension Service for the location of a farm on Parcel # 118180180 with the conditions as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. 5 Page 167 of 252 Item: WSU Farm in R- 12 Zone Vidn'tY A + ,,Fplicant: City of Pasco N Map File #: SP 2015-018 ' ' ' � ii0000e 00 - ^ |' i SITE Land Use Item: WSU Farm in R- 12 Zone Applicant: City of Pasco Map File #: SP 2015-018 Farming (County) Utilities Farming Water Filtration Plant SITE SFDUs Vac. C; us Church Zoning Item: WSU Farm in R- 12 Applicant: City of Pasco Map File #: SP 2015-018 (Coun RS -72 SITE Zone RS -12 S-1 2 30' v cD 0 N CP N EQUIPMENT COMPOUND LAYOUT 41' Versatube Metal Carport Structure 12 ga for a 60 Ib/sq ft snow load (16) mobile home anchors to secure footings 6' tall chain link fence with neutral colored privacy slats around perimeter of building with a 12' rolling gate. 16' 10' 12' Rolling Gate Looking North LLL�IL_ � A, _ 1 122:1 mi r, lw .Nr t-. :! '.+!. - i~,, -+'d. - _ •p�'r`��--ii�.;, «xr i �t}! �. it� f - r ¢ � l� �!.� _,� J-� - 7� 1r.-. '•T,} �,� ti' ���,y,�� .�t r�� A,x 0 NA 10, :ti t�-„j, .+� r• ;.+ t °�q�y' }��. :5;, � ..� !.• v�r.. �i ��r � i �♦ -- �! / ry Ji - Fn -- i _ ` _ a^. Y � F, i1r 14 f`" r �r} - Y1�'..1 b�� �•� ifi ~� 4: k�� FYI",'.rY'� ,i.-. d /: _'� �,(��'• l' �. ��r n ay• i '7t `'' 1,r.- ] - '�?'� '�- ,,,, � '` .. a -'1K �� 1. Y.. . l.��i . ,y�. _ e ;�y.� �'-'"�!"' -' `, `:, -..` _s•�. �Z �.:.�, - r - �Y-' N�-.,, •`e 'vr '-"y:S•�.7"f �-'�.��� -.�'�: �,.{ "may ,` r �.` _ �`� r +r,�•�S^��. - t -'r fs, �v "!�<' "� .�"�'`.r�,�'v�i:{�� f.•i' .�'l� 'T1�^..•- �. --. �. '1i ..-ir; _a• � , i �`'\��'` � r�� N �:� �,�`'.fi„� Sa-�w �- a + � a. •. a. l � "'u ;r ,! �._ S' 4:, �' - � �j atw- Y _! . 1 � v' Y��: ._�:• � :;.rp^.: Sr{k - 4 � 6�s, `}�'” r�,_; % w �,f� I�' ! -f .t ��� 'r`' � t: (. �,, r ". - µ - - 1, _ w "d,. >' rY\ i�''�= . � �' * '� � i'�` ^!.s ,�- /„ ryp�;xy i• + `1� �ia%(- .� . y� r � . - r b a' v?j'`' . ,.;.�. t�% ` -1a - - ';,ir`�+., .��� 1. � "1 _ .fr 'ti. .�,+.. :: i - .� d:' .ate,• Looking South 0 N Ui N PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 12/17/2015 G. Special Permit Special Permit to locate a farm and related buildings (WSU Extension Office) (MF# SP 2015- 018) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the special permit application to locate a farm and related buildings on Road 111. The City of Pasco purchased this site years ago and on the bottom portion of the lot the built a water treatment plant. The site has been a farming location since WWII and has been used for various crop. The City recently leased this site to the Washington State University - Extension Service to start an experimental farm. They had a location on Road 80 and Wernett Road however that property was recently purchased so they needed to relocate. The main issue, and the reason staff required a special use permit is because WSU wishes to add some structures to the site on the north side of the plant to house their equipment. They want to locate a storage shed for tools and equipment storage. Commissioner Portugal asked a Mr. McDonald to clarify on the mention of a windmill. Mr. McDonald responded that he meant to say wind machine, in reference to a previous special permit application that the Commission heard that evening. This applicant will use small equipment and tractors for a row crop operation. Brad Peck, 200 Road 34, spoke in support of this application. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact and development of a recommendation for City Council for the January 21, 2016 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. 1 Page 176 of 252 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1/21/16 G. Special Permit Special Permit to locate a farm and related buildings (WSU Extension Office) (MF# SP 2015- 018) Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the special permit to locate a farm and related buildings for the WSU Extension Office. There were no additional comments. Commissioner Mendez moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Mendez moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Washington State University Extension Service for the location of a farm on parcel # 118-180-180 with the conditions as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. 2 Page 177 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit: Highland Park Sports Field Lighting (MF# SP 2015-017) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Report to Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 12/17/2015 and 01/21/2016 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , approving a special permit for the location of sports field lighting at Highland Park, located west of N. Wehe Avenue between E. Broadway Boulevard and E. Adelia Street, as recommended by the Planning Commission. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On December 17, 2015 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend the location of sports field lighting at Highland Park, located west of N. Wehe Avenue between E. Broadway Boulevard and E. Adelia Street. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned it would be appropriate to recommend locating sports field lighting at Highland Park. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. Page 178 of 252 V. DISCUSSION: The City's Parks and Recreation Department is proposing installation of twenty-four metal -halide luminaries affixed to four 70' galvanized steel poles at Highland Park as part of the park upgrade. The poles would be set back approximately 20' from the playfield, and will be controllable via both automatic and manual control switches. Page 179 of 252 Vicinity Map Item: Sports Field Lights in R- 1 Zone Ain pplicant: City of Pasco File #: SP 2015-017 6.Y. Q s SITE , w OAPAR)E�L I471 ST y � n GEORGE ST —� • LL I� , ry B0NN —71 IRA! RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING IN AN R-1 (LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco submitted an application for the location of sports field lighting at Highland Park located west of N. Wehe Avenue between E. Broadway Boulevard and E. Adelia Street. (Tax Parcel 112 075 013); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 17, 2015 to review a special permit for the City of Pasco; and, WHEREAS, following deliberations on January 21, 2016 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Special Permit for the sports field lighting with certain conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: 1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to the City of Pasco for the location of sports field lighting in an R-1 (Low -Density Residential) District under Master File # SP 2015-017 with the following conditions: a) The special permit shall apply to Parcel #112 075 013; b) Light standards shall be no taller than 70 feet. C) Light shall not be employed between 9:00 pm and 6:00 am. d) Lights shall be installed so as to meet or exceed the minimum light shielding standard as shown on the attached "Illumination Summary." Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this Ist day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 181 of 252 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2015-017 APPLICANT: City of Pasco HEARING DATE: 12/17/2015 525 N 3rd Ave ACTION DATE: 1/21/2016 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Location of Sports Field Lighting in an R-1 (Low -Density Residential) Zone. Legal: Parcel # 112 075 013: The Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 29 Township 9 North Range 30 East Together with Pasco Land Company's 1St Addition, Blocks 161, 162 8v 163 Together with all adjacent vacated roads and alleys. General Location: Highland Park located east of N. Wehe Avenue between E. Broadway Boulevard and E. Adelia Street. Property Size: Approximately 13.7 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from N. Wehe Avenue, E. Broadway Boulevard and E. Adelia Street. 3. UTILITIES: The site has access to water, sewer, and power. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 (Low - Density Residential). Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R- I& C-3 - Whittier and Curie Elementary Schools EAST: R-1 - SFDUs SOUTH: R-1, R-2 & R-3 - SFDUs & duplexes WEST: C-3- Vacant S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for Low - Density Residential uses. Policy CF -4-A encourages implementation of the adopted Parks and Recreation Plan. The City's adopted Parks, Recreation & Forestry Plan contains various goals, objectives and policies to establish well-developed neighborhood parks to serve surrounding neighborhoods within a radius of one-half to one mile. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Comprehensive Plan, information, a threshold Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City City development regulations, and other determination resulting in a Determination of Page 182 of 252 Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. ANALVATR The Comprehensive Plan encourages the location of parks throughout the City. Parks are generally identified as a desirable urban amenity within residential neighborhoods. According to the Parks Plan appropriate facilities for neighborhood parks may include practice fields for softball, soccer, youth baseball etc. The City of Pasco Parks and Recreation Department is in the process of upgrading its facility at Highland Park, located on N. Wehe Avenue just north of E. Adelia Street and south of Whittier and Curie Elementary Schools. Part of the upgrade includes installation of sports field lighting on the south field (Field # 1). The proposed lighting would include four light fixtures, each containing six metal halide luminaries, each fixture set on a 70' tall galvanized steel pole, set back 20' from the playfield (See attached exhibits). Parks are listed under PMC 25.86.020(6) "Unclassified Uses" as requiring a Special Permit. Any substantial improvements thereto also require review through the Special Permit process. The park currently contains three youth football fields, a playground, basketball courts, a wooded picnic area, restrooms, and portable storage buildings. The lighting will increase usable hours of the field, allowing the City to meet increasing demand. The lighting will be shielded from sending glare directly into neighboring properties, as per PMC 12.32.020 and will be controllable via both automatic and manual control switches. According to the vendor's Illumination Summary, the light spill at the closest property line will be approximately 2.2 in horizontal footcandles* (See attached "light Spillage" map; *A "footcandle" is defined as "the illuminance cast on a surface by a one -candela source one foot away," a "candela" being roughly equivalent to a candle weighing one sixth of a pound and burning at a rate of 120 grains per hour); this is roughly equivalent to the light one might experience while standing in the indirectly lit area between two City street lights. Lights will be used primarily in the fall (September - November) during the Pasco Youth Football playing season, Saturday evenings from dusk until about 8:00 pm with occasional use on Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday evenings., and in Spring (March - May), coinciding with Lacrosse season and youth flag football, Primarily on Saturday evenings. Organized use during the summer is 2 Page 183 of 252 very minimal, most of which occurs during daylight hours. The fields will be shut down during the winter to allow them to rest. Applicable regulations regarding outdoor lighting are as shown below: PMC 12.32.020 SHIELDING" specifies that "All outdoor lighting systems . . . shall be shielded from above in such a manner that the edge of the shield shall be level with or below the center of the light source so that any direct light emitted above the horizontal is minimized. All outdoor lighting fixtures installed in zone two on or after ninety days from the enactment of the ordinance codified herein shall be shielded in such a manner so that any direct light emitted above the horizontal is minimized. Light direction refractors shall be considered to be light sources. PMC 12.32.040 "UNLAWFUL ACTS" prohibits "the illumination after midnight of an outdoor public recreation facility unless a specific recreational activity is already in progress" The park is located in an R-1 Zone and is surrounded on three sides (north, east and south) by residential zoning; two elementary schools are located across the street to the north; land to the east is fully built out with low-density residential development and nearly built out to the south with the permits for Habitat for Humanity housing having recently been issued; land to the west is zoned C-3 and is currently vacant. FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The City of Pasco Parks and Recreation Department has applied for a Special Permit to locate sports field lighting at its facility at Highland Park. 2. Highland Park is located on N. Wehe Avenue just north of E. Adelia Street and south of Whittier and Curie Elementary Schools. 3. The City of Pasco Parks and Recreation Department is in the process of upgrading its facility at Highland Park, 4. Highland Park is located on N. Wehe Avenue just north of E. Adelia Street and south of Whittier and Curie Elementary Schools. 3 Page 184 of 252 5. Part of the upgrade includes installation of sports field lighting on the south field (Field # 1) . 6. The proposed lighting would include four light fixtures, each containing six metal halide luminaries, each fixture set on a 70' tall galvanized steel pole (see attached Exhibit). 7. According to the vendor's Illumination Summary, the light spill at the closest property line will be approximately 2.2 in horizontal footcandles. This is roughly equivalent to the light one might experience while standing in the indirectly lit area between two City street lights. 8. PMC 12.32.020 requires all outdoor lighting systems to be shielded so that any direct light emitted above the horizontal is minimized. 9. PMC 12.32.040 prohibits illuminating outdoor public recreation facilities after midnight "unless a specific recreational activity is already in progress." 10. The lighting will be shielded from sending glare directly into neighboring properties, as per PMC 12.32.020 11. The lighting will be controllable via both automatic and manual control switches. 12. Lights will be used primarily Saturday evenings with occasional use on Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday evenings until about 8:00 pm during the fall (September through November), and in Spring (March - May). Organized summer use is minimal and during daylight hours. 13. The fields will be shut down during the winter. 14. Parks are listed under PMC 25.86.020(6) "Unclassified Uses" as requiring a Special Permit. 15. Any substantial improvements to parks require review through the Special Permit process. 16. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the location of parks throughout the City. Parks are generally identified as a desirable urban amenity within residential neighborhoods. 17. According to the Parks Plan appropriate facilities for neighborhood parks may include practice fields for softball, soccer, youth baseball etc. 4 Page 185 of 252 18. The park currently contains three youth football fields, a playground, basketball courts, a wooded picnic area, restrooms, and portable storage buildings. 19. The proposed lighting will increase usable hours of the field, allowing the City to meet increasing demand. 20. The park is located in an R-1 Zone 21. The Park is surrounded on three sides (north, east and south) by residential zoning; 22. Two elementary schools are located across the street to the north of the Park; 23. Land to the east of the Park is fully built out with low-density residential development and nearly built out to the south with the permits for Habitat for Humanity housing having recently been issued; 24. Land to the west of the Park is zoned C-3 and is currently vacant. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 and determine whether or not the proposal: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan encourages the location of parks throughout the City. Parks are generally identified as a desirable urban amenity within residential neighborhoods. According to the Parks Plan appropriate facilities for neighborhood parks may include practice fields for softball, soccer, youth baseball etc. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The park is already built; the upgraded lighting fixtures will draw more power than existing on-site lights, but not beyond the capability of existing utilities. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? 5 Page 186 of 252 The Park is already in place. Current residential building activity to the south is being undertaken with knowledge of the park's existence. According to the Parks Plan appropriate facilities for neighborhood parks may include practice fields for softball, soccer, youth baseball etc. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereofP The area to the east is already fully developed, as is most of the neighborhood to the south. Homes for the remaining residential lots to the south are currently under permit or in the application process. Properties to the west are zoned for general commercial business. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? PMC 12.32.020 requires all outdoor lighting systems to be shielded so that any direct light emitted above the horizontal is minimized. PMC 12.32.040 prohibits illuminating outdoor public recreation facilities after midnight "unless a specific recreational activity is already in progress." The City requires lighting to be shielded from sending glare directly into neighboring properties, as per PMC 12.32.020. The lighting will be controllable via both automatic and manual control switches. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Increased lighting will extend the useable play time for the field past sunset hours, drawing larger sports crowds and potentially creating increased noise, traffic and parking nuisances to surrounding neighborhoods. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall apply to Parcel # 112 075 013; 2) Light standards shall be no taller than 70 feet. 3) Light shall not be employed between 9:00 pm and 6:00 am. 4) Lights shall be installed so as to meet or exceed the minimum light shielding standard as shown on the attached "Illumination Summary." C Page 187 of 252 MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the City of Pasco for the location of Sports Field Lighting at the city of Pasco Highland Park (Parcel # 112 075 013) with the conditions as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. 7 Page 188 of 252 Vicinity Map Item: Sports Field Lights in R- 1 Zone Ain pplicant: City of Pasco File #: SP 2015-017 w�'1,LU �O P _ Z s SITE , w LUJ ADE I ST \ , y � n GEORGE ST • LL I� PQ a Land Use WE Item: Sports Field Lights in R- 1 Zone Applicant: City of Pasco File #: SP 2015-017 Franklin Elementary Emmerson Elementary SITE SFDUs BROADWAY BLVD GEORGE ST Zoning Map pit C-3 Item: Sports Field Lights in R- 1 Zone Applicant: City of Pasco File #: SP 2015-017 R-1 SITE m7M BROADWAY BLVD GEORGEST M J i I �UtxYert Restroo into Ad Sty Field #1 Sports Field Light Banks r -,-q Looking North ae r -: � w-. w 'F . _ � '�; , �-x* � r �' �* �' '� s' ,� i` "i r + � �} � , V C w e 'r � � y- � � t r . �'�M, i 'c � d� i � y r �� i r y�� l f,. �, . ,� ^��. ,� •� , �y•tM; tl �+; w+ y "vac'. k�s4yp, '"�'1 �� � ��. { 7 � " t � A Nae,,,'i ; �@ �.� s4 �` ry �Zy , r 'N'�� Y , ~�. f 7+r` n , yy` ° � ,'."Wa .:� �R '�' ,; �'' Yet �e., �'�v ' � ..{ v. y�}+a .a•��' "� �`/ "4: ^h ' 1jk'a �� �'"'1'o Y,j� i," p "�^i Fp �� � +��" �� Y 3 T" ,�r i� �ti� �y� ti� ,t������'l � r w ����r�r����e 4'Vd� � g„,''t4% `�t. ��,���ay,, � � Nt "'ri,b,�. �? !. `i i r . P o��ir�� � ".+ .�� `,A�gfe.N.4 �.'�.�J� .flt s"vi""y;',r,��rwY�y� ��'!�.' Looking West � hl'�i EQUIPMENT •• AREAS SHOWN Name: Highland Park Football Location: Pasco,WA Pole Luminaires Name: Blanket Grid Size: GRADE MOUNTING LAMP QTYI THIS OTHER QTY LOCATION SIZE ELEVATION HEIGHT TYPE POLE GRID GRIDS 4 F144 70' 1 - 70' 150OW MZ 1 6 6 0 4 TOTALS 8.53 1 24 24 0 A.0 113.0 A.0 113.0 4P.0 113.0 4P.0 A.0 4P.0 A.0 A.o A.0 A.o A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 P.O AD A.0 A.0 A.0 AD A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 P.O A.0 113.0 A.0 113.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 P.O A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 p.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 Al A.1 Al 411.1 411.1 411.1 A.1 411.1 A.1 411.1 411.1 411.1 411.0 A.0 411.0 411.0 411.0 411.0 411.0 411.0 P.O 4P.0 113.0 4P.0 113.0 A.0 Al 4P.1 4P.1 4P.1 4P.1 4P.1 A.1 4P.1 4P.1 4P.1 A.1 4P.1 4P.1 10.1 A.1 10.1 A.1 10.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 4P.0 AD A.0 AD A.0 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.2 A:2 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.2 A.2 A:2 A.2 A.2 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.2 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 AD A.0 A.0 A.o A.0 A.o A.1 4P.1 A.1 4P.1 A.2 4P.2 A.2 A.3 A.3 A.3 A.3 A.3 A.5 A.7 A.6 A.4 A.3 A.2 A.3 A.3 A.3 A.2 A.2 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.3 A.3 A.7 .1.1 .1.0 A.7 A.7 ..3 .2.2 .2.3 .2.3 .2.0 A.9 A.6 A.8 ..1 A.9 4P.5 A.3 4P.2 A.2 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 4P.0 A.0 105' 105' 4P.0 A.0 4P.1 4P.1 4P.1 A.z 4P.3 A.4 4P.9 ..8 3.3 .5.3 F511 A.4 .7.7 7.9 x:1-..1.3. 25.5 .4.6 ,2.7 ..4 4P.6 A.4 4P.2 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 4P.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.1 A:2 A.4 A:8 ..8 .4.4 .0.5 .21.1 9 4.3 .25.9 .24.8 20A 21.4 .26.2 .955 ,2 .24.7 .7.0 .7.6 ...1 ..4 A.6 A.3 A.2 P. A.1 P. A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 rN iA 4P.0 A.0 4P.1 4P.1 4P.2 A.3 4P.6 .1.3 3.0 A.1 .21 3 .3L 5.5 31 .6 .33.4 .43.7 .30.9 .31.3 .35.4 .31 3 .31P 91 6 3 .1 .2 .2 .5.3 5.4 .2.1 A.9 A.5 A.3 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 4P.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.4 A.7 .1.6 .4.0 A.6 .2 .2 .3 .7 .32.2 .32.1 3 .1 .4 2 .8 3 .1 .43.2 .30.4 .31.6 3 .4 21.9 .6.3 6.9 2.8 ..2 A.6 A.3 A.2 A.1 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 I + A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.4 A.e .1.8 {1.1 A.5 . .4 3 .2 32.6 32.3 3 .3 3 .3 3 .2 .8 3 .8 32.1 3 .3 317 .2 0 .5.2 46.9 3.0 ..3 A.6 A.3 A.2 A.1 A.1 A.0 P.O A.0 P.O A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.4 A.7 .1.6 3.9 A.6 2 .3 32.9 32.2 32.0 31.0 33.5 3 .9 30.2 33.3 30 3 31.6 33.5 2 .0 .6.3 46.9 .2.8 ..2 A.6 A.3 A.2 A.1 A.1 4P.0 A.0 4P.0 A.0 4P.0 A.0 4P.1 A.1 4P.2 A.3 4P.6 ..2 3.0 .8.0 .2 .1 32.7 35.6 31.7 33.5 33.5 3 .8 31.2 35.3 31.5 31 7 37A .2 .1 .5.1 .5.3 2.1 0.9 0.5 0.3 10.1 0.1 40.1 40.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 N O A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.4 A.8 ..8 .4.2 .0.1 .20.v7,24.0 23.3 25.2 .24.2 .9.8 .20.8 25.6-.2 4.7 .233 ,23.8 .16.4 .7 .3 3.0 Q.3 A.6 A.3 A.2 0.1 0.1 A.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4 A.9 3.7 3.2 .5.0 F4 2.8 A.8 .7.9 .7.4 .7.6 3.5.2 .4.4 .2.6 ..3 0.6 A.4 A.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 105' 105' A.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.2 A.3 A.6 .1.0 .1.0 A.6 A.6 .1.2 .2.1 .2.2 .2.2 ..9 A.9 A.6 A.7 ..1 A.9 A.5 A.3 A.2 A.2 10.1 A.1 0.1 A.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 1P.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.2 A.2 A.3 A.3 A.3 A.3 A.3 A.5 A.7 A.6 0.4 A.3 A.2 A.3 0.3 A.3 0.2 A.2 0.1 01 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 Al A.1 Al A.1 A.1 A.1 P2 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.z A.z A.z A.z A.2 A.z A.I A.1 0.1 A.z 0.1 A.1 0.1 A.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 0.0 A.0 1p A.o A.o A.o A.o Al Al Al Al A.1 A.1 Al Al Al Al Al Al Al 10.1 A.1 10 1 A.1 10.1 A.1 10.1 Al 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.1 A.1 Al A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 11) 1 A.1 A.1 A.1 A.1 Al 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.1 A.0 A.0 A.0 10.0 A.1 A. A.0 10.0 A.0 10.0 A.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.o A.0 A.0 A.o A.0 A.o A.0 A.0 A.0 A.o 10.0 A.0 A. A.0 10.0 A.0 10.0 A.0 0.0 A.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 1P A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 10.0 A.0 A. A.0 10.0 A.0 10.0 A.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.o A.0 A.0 A.o A.0 A.o A.0 A.0 A.0 A.o A.0 A.0 A. A.0 10.0 A.0 10.0 1P.0 A.0 A.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 A.0 0.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 'Do A.0 'Do A.0 10.0 A. A.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 A.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Do 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Iv A.o A.o A.0 A.o A.o A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.o A.0 A.o A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.0 A.o SCALE IN FEET 1 :150 0' 150' 300' Pole locations) +dimensions are relative to 0,0 reference point(s) (D C= mus PROJECTMY Name: Highland Park Football Location: Pasco,WA GRID SUMMARY Name: Blanket Grid Size: 360'x 160' Spacing: 30.0'x 30.0' Height: 3.0' above grade CONSTANT• SUMMARY HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES Entire Grid Scan Average: 3.07 Maximum: 37 Minimum: 0 Avg / Min: 549.98 Max / Min: 6663.25 UG (adjacent pts): 8.53 CU: 0.86 No. of Points: 1008 LUMINAIRE INFORMATION Luminaire Type: Green Generation Design Usage Hours: 5,000 hours Design Lumens: 134,000 Avg Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.000 No. of Luminaires: 24 Avg KW: 37.54 (40.8 max) Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANT ILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the design usage hours of the system. Field Measurements: Illumination measured in accordance with IESNA LM -5-04 and CIBSE LG4. Individual values may vary. See the Warranty document for details. Electrical System Requirements: Refer to Amperage Draw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary" for electrical sizing. Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3% nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structures located within 3 feet (1m) of design locations. ENGINEERED DESIGN By: Brad Vonk File # / Date: 177858 09 -Dec -15 Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the written consent of Musco Sports Lighting, LLC. ©1981, 2015 Musco Sports Lighting, I.I.C. - �, Light Spillage 'P'O p 0 o "P.0 p-0 00 y o p.0 yo ro¢P p p.0 p 0 p.0 p.0 p 0 p.0 p 1pfo 'D 0 .00 P . p.0 p 0 p.01. p i' p.p. p'0 p.0 D.o p.0 p.o D.1. p.1 Do p.0 00 00 p.1 P pa p1 ,p.t p.0 p.0 y.0 p.1 p.t D.1 pt 00 pa 01 D.1 D1 P p3 03 p7 1• p.0 D.0 D.1 4).1 4).1 p 2 p.3 PA p.9 *1 8 p p.oorAP, 1 p1 4).1 p2 4't --"A3 ,.a A to 4.8.. 3 '� 2• z �'. 00 D\ y y.1 y2 y3 �3 '�:0 II v t. .7 -9 1 5.4 1.3 16 iZ A 0 D 0 A D D 2 0 ' A p.0 p.0\;' p:2 y4'-? p0 p0, p1 pz y3 ps t J. I i; 356 a r s: tr6 r, s��� p0�po p1 pt p.1 .a2 pa D6 ;.� *,A f t - 4Jto -a 512M 6-o 5e 3:3- a ,6 D �3 t D.0 p0 D.1 D p.1 D.2 p3 D4 p9 .1 7 p2 $0 4 ;2:8 D.8 ,7.9 ,7.4 ,7.6 47.9 ,5 .7 ,2 $2 .14 X2.6 . 3 %D:6 t \ s* F�3 `,. po yo yo pt\y.1 yt y;.2 y p3-yb 7-0 ,t-.0 ps-pis-t2-p7 .2-22 �9. p"s p7-YTps; F :s.� _ Do D.uy-0o�2 p.5 p3 4)3 0,3 4) p.5 .7 p5 -0 - p p3 3 �. . po po. yo y0; -01 p1 pi y1 1•'�, 1 ,0'z�y.1 D1 D1 D' 1'2'iD2 D'- -02 -02 D r 1 y.0 y. o p o p 0 ,ob 1. p.) D 1 A l y.1 y.;'yy.1 p.1 '01 D `� p.1 D t' D:1, D 1 D _M - p0 pn..- .'�'OprD�y,o pt: 1 y1.�� ,cr y1 p1,1 p1 y.1 p1 y1 p. D0 y0 po,p�o p'otD'o o pa yd. D0 D1 yo y0 ye po D1 0 D 0 ,D 0 4) 0 'p o y:0 y 01� .6 o .y! `D 0 10, D o .00 y.0 D o y.0 .0 - 0 10 p.0 p0 p0. po; 'tic pot 0 ,po.1 C0 p0 po .00 p0 D. o.IF.P'o •' p.a Da' p.0 yo pogo, �o -yo o .p� p.0 po po yo p0 D.O. D.0 '0 0�po_Qo,_po .o ''tt 3 Aa y.0 po D0 y., L.O: Ao po yo �o, D0 'Do D0, A.o. D.o D0. D,O D.0 D -Qo,, •-.o S. Y p.0 po p.0 D.O. p p.0 -por o �rpro p0'"po po po. p.,o 4) 0: po po po P ,'' afYr0 •F..4 Morin s � � W J GEOR d01 w: r r err •�, p� ' p.1 'P.1 p:1 P:1 D'o � A.O p o gyp , '` ,P2 P 2 p.1 p.1 A4 .p2 p.1 ,p.i A ..tiEA�o •A W .� .. y0 Da . Ao P s 1 �A �, 1. 1 p D 0 p.0 D. Ao p0>' t HA2 I -oDO Do .,. .. W -, 1 po yo po � c p t p't Pi o Dom • a.. ' o -po o,Do po DQ,DotA..o�- Ao D 0 o D0 I; o. Ao 0 s 1� p.e p.o .0 � a• p.0, I o`, p.o y.o. .F•.. ■ , o a p0 Do p0 po I 0 ,P.O A:0 o y.o 00 pe po ,o p.o po' po. p.o• • s I GE ST Light -Structure GreenTMSystem — still Five Easy Pieces" plus: Improved Luminaire Efficiency 1. Reflector system: More than 2000 photometric patterns provide optimal energy efficiency and minimal spill light for each project. 2. Visor System: Several visor choices provide energy efficient light on the field and minimal spill light. The aerodynamics reduce wind load on the poles. 3. Side Shift Beam Control: Beams can be adjusted within the luminaire horizontally as well as vertically. We can now custom fit the light to the corners. Smart Lamp- Operating System 1. Lamp: 30 years of lamp experience has taught Musco how to operate the lamp with less energy and extend its life with a system of timed power adjustments. 2. Geared tilt adjustment: With a geared leveling mechanism, the lamp arc tube operates in the energy advantageous horizontal position. Increased Durability, Assured Results 1. Die -Cast aluminum reflector housing: Provides a rugged foundation for building and maintaining a sophisticated photometric unit. 2. Gasketing: Improved material and gasket system design virtually eliminate "outgasing" and other contamination of the reflectors and lens. 3. Factory Assembled Luminaires: The luminaire ships totally assembled: avoids contaminants, saves time, improves aiming accuracy. 4. Attaching Mechanism: The factory assembled luminaire connects electrically and structurally to the crossarm with one simple attachment. 5. Factory Aiming: Musco's well established service of factory aiming is even better with Light -Structure Green'"... field, changes can still be done. Solid control and flexible management 1. Controls and monitoring: This system, in one simple cabinet, included in the base price, saves energy and gives you a solid, flexible management tool. 2. Control Link Central-: Real people at Musco, 24/7, support the operation of your lights ... from office, field or home ... benefits field users and neighbors. Ultimate guarantee With Green Generation Lighting, Musco's Constant 25" guarantees it all for 25 years, plus free relamping at the end of the lamps' rated life. All of this is assured by Musco's field service department and their technicians. Light -Structure GreenTM is the result of more than a dozen inventions and innovations from more than 10 million dollars of research and capital investment by Musco. 0000 mus o, We Make It Happen ©2005, 2011 Musco Sports Lighting, LLC B-200-6 800/825-6030 www.musco.com e-mail: Iighting@musco.com Poletop Luminaire Assembly 3. Steel Pole 4. Electrical Components Enclosure 5. Precast Concrete Base Patents Issued and Pending Page 199 of 252 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 12/17/2015 F. Special Permit Special Permit for the location of sports field lighting in an R-1 (Low Density Residential) Zone (City of Pasco) (MF# SP 2015-017) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, discussed the special permit for the location of sports field lighting in an R-1 zone. The location is at Highland Park just to the east of Wehe Street and north of Adelia Street. The park already exists and the Grid Kids Football program has been using the field for many years. They have obtained a grant to have some lighting installed around the field. The staff report contains a lot of information that normally isn't included in a special permit request, such as, sketches for foot candle measurements onto a land use map. Mr. White put the map on the overhead for the Commissioners. Directly to the south is the plat that Habitat for Humanity is currently working on, Whitehouse Addition. In the packet for this item the light spillage chart that is superposed onto the vicinity map shows foot candle measurements of approximately 2 right at the boundary of the field and the Habitat for Humanity plat. In the staff report there is also a description to what a foot candle is. It won't be a whole lot of light and will generally be during the Fall and Spring. The City of Pasco's Park & Recreation Specialist is present to answer any questions the Commission may have on this proposal. Chairman Cruz reminded the Commission that one thing to look for is excess light spillage and gave examples of previous applications the Commission has reviewed. Brent Kubalek, 5902 Tyre Drive, spoke on behalf of the Parks & Recreation Department. He stated that the City of Pasco was able to apply for this youth athletic facilities grant. The project is a $267,000 project and they grant is providing half of that cost. Chairman Cruz asked if there was a significant demand for the lighting. Mr. Kubalek responded that the program has been so successful that they have to play later into the evenings and later into the Fall when it gets dark earlier due to how many players have started signing up. Commissioner Portugal asked about the traffic the program generates as it started as 200 students and is now up to 1,000. Mr. Kubalek stated that it hasn't really created more traffic since there are still around the same number of people at one time just longer times. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Page 200 of 252 Commissioner Mendez moved, seconded by Commissioner Portugal, to close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact and development of a recommendation for City Council for the January 21, 2016 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Page 201 of 252 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1/21/16 F. Special Permit Special Permit for the location of sports field lighting in an R-1 (Low Density Residential) Zone (City of Pasco) (MF# SP 2015-0171 Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the special permit for the location of sports field lighting in an R-1 (Low -Density Residential) Zone. There were no additional comments. Commissioner Bowers asked about a map that could better illustrate where in the City of Pasco this site was located. Mr. McDonald clarified where this site was located. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact and development of a recommendation for City Council for the January 21, 2016 meeting. Page 202 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Rick White, Director, Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, Communications Specialist Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Columbia Dunes (MF# PP 2015-005) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Preliminary Plat Report to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 12/17/15 & 1/21/2016 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , a resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Columbia Dunes. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On December 17, 2015 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to develop a recommendation for the City Council on the preliminary plat for Columbia dunes. The proposed plat is located on Road 90 to the north of Sandifur Parkway. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission determined that with conditions, the preliminary plat could be recommended for approval. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached resolution. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. Page 203 of 252 V. DISCUSSION: This site contains approximately five acres that will be divided into 20 lots. The lots will range in size from 7,295 square feet to over 11,500 square feet. The average lot size will be 8,468 square feet which is similar to the average lot size in the subdivision directly to the east. Page 204 of 252 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR COLUMBIA DUNES. WHEREAS, RCW 58.17 enables the City to uniformly administer the process of subdividing property for the overall welfare of the community; and, WHEREAS, owners and developers of property situated in the northeast quarter of Section 8, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., have requested approval of a preliminary plat; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said preliminary plat which is named Columbia Dunes; and, WHEREAS, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission found the proposed plat promoted the general welfare of the community and recommended said preliminary plat be approved with conditions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That the preliminary plat for Columbia Dunes located in northeast quarter of Section 8, Township 9 North, Range 29, East W.M., is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10 -foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 4. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". 5. The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $375 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this Pt day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 207 of 252 WILSHIRE DRIVE I Yk j THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF COLUMBIA DUNES S.W, 1/4 OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SEC- OS, T -09N., R.29E., W.M., CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON _ ^17Ka1k1L: ; W r91 n•. ]fi 5 ti a 40ry �'� 9n, tas'( 6srArFs - - IR PACKARD DRM11 Kam 9 �� F0.wp z/9• es],., tan 3 VICINITY SKETCH 5 'O 17 1 az' or bt or 62' 69' 62' - b]' m, NBi T4 SCALE n lbi LdF 19 s 1 LOr 8 -� N Is ar 1 Y ora:' Y Gs s T 4 a Lar 5 Loi a LOi ]Y38/ -„ x LEGEND I- A M •{ 8 ). g' b}]] 9 $]TrSE_ $4]] sp 4a" ` kJiy�9 q'i • iO.RID Aa s1pCAfttl _ Lor'rri R -i FUwd ql SFi E`• 6 OISN CARO 1RA55 C:xP bl B0.fl • OA5e5 OF CM A 12 - M -\ •� r iii Il 2 - WNC1Krf CLs AW CUTLER POL[ SrREEA •I __ \ .'PROtiO E`I q .. Pb[IFR .�vz {. .,-. -P'E, AT • W - PpKR TRAAig'—i yT 5A' - b br • gf OE vACA20) y1 - P T 9AULF o { €k C E CLkJR7 A� R mP . s AR. MWO YA .- I _ 4 SFfPTARY SERER YTER L pi r$' '-x•y - S€ MY NAAE: COOPER Ci r r//' :��•+� q Nf.N SPOT ELEYA M lQP W LW j 111 1A I1P . SPO EOW PpN TOP of Ay.NA,T q 5 w b4�mx�pFrai o 0� f / �/ aE cF. T I iii �' i f T �' - exNecRuez T 11 LOT 1$ Lal 17 Y 'LOT 16- Y LOT Y -LOT 4 Y - --- L0712 „ LWi 61 NABR DRlY,6 bA7x SF a>b $219 q bare sF $z4b s 9.. -EF iaj9re g r.aaa sr v 42 - -- j- 1NrE�R�C P�rrawxRtl 66 a on Ri slRAiiIX1 - +9azw rWAQ CA -%P (MASS CAP !•liE �x '� T�1 F.LpE Y-+9i.Y9' B �� I LRNEA CgjGW�UI `�I']eljl'.-�, HGM ]4r 4p -+ I Ril9c pf ICARffG FAWN 5/E' Kom R—ES PHA ! YARR{0 YIERkr BI��S K LYAIIdN tll Y, ca-a:.'z Fsa*€s air pr PAsca l NCW i4 9Ai4111 E1FY-b13.1 b' FrAAweNi A i1rREE-SECd10 FdTAL SFATION NOTES � ?{pCW RAPER RO[ M. Lim QE L0 �a 0M, N'LM aa9b sc Pp6A 5. 1 SCONSU l t, C � 1 � � PREWIHARY PLAT FOR LOP 6� OF DC PLAT W ME'S E3TAPE5 REOf D LOT SOE LAR 5` LOS 16; lA,4} SF FAMO. wA 99A1 l 6ardown Crmatalt&w, LLC SAJYDIFUR PARKWAY w YOL 1 a PLASS AT PACE r+, KCOR05 W LO r aN AY AS IIAW s rv'WE sw-619-+633 pTAL PRAT ACPEAc: 7 ApAES +rl TRA TTDM SUR VEYANC FRANIUAI Lw91Am, wAsnNcrw. � f4 / — — rplti:OMR MTl Mu yi - ip EA�YERri B�A�mN OESC1PfTE5 PL NH IC MESEMYAnp€S. CO4ENAN15 AI) MlStt6CTe S, o ft4 U.CAr FEE?; 57s' a .ucwaaiRw. Lts 'PA r@- A/,fPPINC PT' (,Q j "Co" Alp IH MEN. Kim AK,- x% fl'/ $$] ALNES FASP'l. 1Ai 49]43 x[NNE. 9A 44]:19 `V - p1tllPN U1W1;5 SHPMI YAV( 9rei1 IL.A' iLb TROY FSiD LLdtm P*e D 549-619-A693 �5g9j PN731A ,.'.'xalAT(il. 71Y 91[uEMR YAKS Ap WAlANIEE THAI T1E "Wh Ory f. INDEX {9047 ]S1-4560 N uia14ES 914.1 ALL SUCH .1 NS n W AREA, P8A[R: F AE 4 ply �P, Put 1L!!afl O .LBW'S 41 ABAA041F®.. 1K SUR1Ertlt PO WR p s NOT TELCNItI1L CNARPW ger} PURCEN bLW.. 9117.. { Y % �t i. R •b99PP1 A)1Fi O 4013 •Ai TIE 4A'IKRA1d UTM1]9C5 SNB1W AAC 91 TE EMACT R11W: Qix •iYCARI} 14.111G10N XE fWE3 �1BTEY PkAT My .WE LOCJ,TEO CA4 CASGdE NArORAI 6Ai PACO. T+A 94)Of n EL'I AS P0�6E FNOY TI# AifPWATKW AVIKA(IE. MS PHpt9'.: a49/5A]_a114 CUM 11/11/15 JIi. 1 Li 1 FAx• 509/aF9-Sr14 O 1 5 Aqf 1n1T9CALLY LpCAlEO 1HE IAl6EPCJtOII'O YRLITES � tl1 OOFi. iAE (RAINi (1' (O I Jde 14599 ti• 1V REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2015-005 APPLICANT: Bardown Consulting HEARING DATE: 12/17/2015 P.O. Box 3252 ACTION DATE: 1/21/2016 Pasco, WA 99302 BACKGROUND REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Columbia Dunes 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 6 Coles Estates General Location: 5800 Block of Road 90 Property Size: 4.72 Acres Number of Lot/ s Proposed: 20 single-family residential lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 7,295 ft2 to 11,594 ft2 Average Lot Square Footage: 8,468ft2 2. ACCESS: The property has access from Road 90 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities serve the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned C-1 (Retail Business) and is in the process of being rezoned to R-1 to accommodate the proposed Columbia Dunes Plat. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-3 - Vacant (Proposed Senior Housing Project) SOUTH: C-1 - Vacant & Veterinarian Clinic EAST: R-1 - Single -Family Dwellings WEST: C-1- Vacant 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for residential development. Policy H -1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU -2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. Page 209 of 252 ANAT.VSiR The site is part of the Coles Estates that was platted for residential development in 1967. In 1982 Coles Estates was annexed to the City and a portion of the subdivision was zoned C-1 (Retail Business). The site has remained vacant and undeveloped since it was platted in the sixties. In 2009 an LID (Local Improvement District) was formed to extend Road 90 north from Sandifur Parkway past the site. Some utility services were also included with the street improvements. The applicant, Bardown Consulting has applied for a rezone and preliminary plat approval to allow the site to be subdivided into 20 single-family lots. The City's Comprehensive Plan designates this site for Mixed Residential land uses which permits a variety of residential zoning ranging from RS -20 (Suburban) through R-3. R-1 zoning would permit the applicant to develop residential lots with a minimum square footage of 7,200 square feet. In this case the applicant is proposing to develop residential lots with an average minimum lot size of 8,468 square. The frontage requirements for residential lots will not enable the applicant to achieve an average lot size of 7,200 square feet as permitted by R-1 zoning. The lots in the neighboring subdivision to the east average about 8,400 square feet in size. The subdivision (Vintage Village) to the east is zoned R-1 in 2003 and contains over 140 lots. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 20 residential lots; with the lots varying in size from 7,295 to 11,594 square feet. The average lot size is 8,468 square feet. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have adequate frontage on streets which will be dedicated. UTILITIES: Municipal sewer and water lines are located in Road 90. The developer will be responsible for extending utilities into the plat. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the construction design phase of the platting process. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not encroach upon buildable portions of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of 300 feet on residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets. The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street. 2 Page 210 of 252 STREET NAMES: The one street will be named prior to final platting. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires installation of irrigation lines as a part of infrastructure improvements. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. The Public Works Director may waive the fee if the developer mixes a soil additive in the ground that provides 30% retention of irrigation water. In this case there are no water rights to deed to the City as a result the current fee will be required before a final plat is approved. INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.110) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact": Prevent Overcrowding: With an average lot size of 8,468 square feet the proposed development will address the overcrowding concern by providing manageable lots and usable open spaces. R-1 zoning requires a 20 -foot front yard setback, five-foot side yard setbacks and a rear yard equal to or greater than the height of the house. Parks Opens Space/Schools: The proposed plat is located within a third of a mile from Vintage Park. Vintage Park is located directly south of Maya Angelou Elementary School. The developer will be required to pay the current park fee prior to receiving building permits. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new home at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The plat is laid out for low-density residential development consistent with surrounding residential developments. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to current City standards and to the standards of the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of the intersection with road 90 will be installed with the construction of the road improvements. 3 Page 211 of 252 Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. Provision of Housing for State Residents: The proposed preliminary plat contains 20 building lots, providing opportunities for the construction of 20 new homes for Pasco residents. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitation of 40 percent and building setbacks will assure adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The access streets will be paved and developed to City standards to assure that proper access is maintained to each lot. The discussion under safe travel above applies to this section also. Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is designated for mixed -residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings: • The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Area Boundary. • The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within Urban Growth Boundaries. • The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for mixed -residential development which includes single-family homes. • The site is currently being rezoned from C-1 to R-1. • The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of a variety of residential densities and housing types. • Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 200 vehicle trips per day. • The current traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the I-182 Corridor when warranted. • RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved. • The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012. • Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools. 4 Page 212 of 252 • There are no water rights associated with this plat therefor a payment in lieu of dedication of water rights will be required to receive final plat approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. • Plat improvements within the City of Pasco are required to comply with the 2015 Standard Drawings and Specification as approved by the City Engineer. These improvements include but are not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps are completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. Sidewalks are installed at the time permits are issued for new houses. Except sidewalks along major streets, which are installed with the street improvements. • All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings are required to utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. • All storm water generated from a developed plat is required to be disposed of • per City and State codes and requirements. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer is required to enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer is responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement is presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. • The City has nuisance regulations (PMC 9.60) that require property owners (including developers) to maintain their properties in a manner that does not injure, annoy or endanger the comfort and repose of other property owners. This includes controlling dust, weeds and litter during times of construction for both subdivisions and buildings including houses. • Prior to acceptance of final plats developers are required to prepare and submit record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form must be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. • Sandifur Parkway and other major streets in the I-182 corridor have been developed with landscaped boulevard strips. All residents benefit from the boulevard strips and as a result new subdivisions all participate in a modest cost for upkeep. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop Findings of Fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, 5 Page 213 of 252 schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the Franklin County PUD, the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable and Ben -Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. The PUD requested easements along the front of all lots for utility service. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for additional housing within the City. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates much of the site for mixed - residential development. Single-family homes are identified as one of the permitted residential uses within the mixed residential designation. Plan Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community while Plan Policy H -1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision C Page 214 of 252 regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e. school impact fees, park development and boundary fence construction) are included in approval conditions. (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. If approved the proposed plat will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to insure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will insure the public use and interest are served. TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 2. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 3. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10 -foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 4. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". 5. The developer/ builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $375 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: MOTION: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. MOTION: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Road 84 Estates with conditions as listed in the January 21 2016 staff report. 7 Page 215 of 252 1111 11 Zoning Map Item: Columbia Dunes Preliminary Plat A, licant: Bardown Consulting N -fI---IFP --C;7 File PP 2015-005 MEN NONE 11 1111 oil 1 NINE WILSHIRE DRIVE I Yk j THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF COLUMBIA DUNES S.W, 1/4 OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SEC- OS, T -09N., R.29E., W.M., CITY OF PASCO, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON _ ^17Ka1k1L: ; W 161 n•. ]fi 5 5n, tas'( csre>Es - - IR PACKARD DRM11 Kam 9 �� F0.wp z/9• es],., tan 3 VICINITY SKETCH 5 'O 17 1 az' or bt or 62' 69' 62' - b]' m, NBi T4 SCALE n lbi LdF 19 s 1 LOr 8 -� N Is ar 1 Y ora:' Y Gs s T 4 a Lar 5 Loi a LOi ]Y38/ -„ x LEGEND I- A M •{ 8 ). g' b}]] 9 $]TrSE_ $4]] sp 4a" ` kJiy�9 q'i • iO.RID Aa s1pCAfttl _ Lor'rri R -i FUwd ql SFi E`• 6 OISN CARO 1RA55 C:xP bl B0.fl • OA515 OF CM A 12 - M -\ •� r iii Il 2 - WNCIKTC CLs AW CUTLER •I __ \ .'PROtiO E`YI q .. Pb[IFR .�vz {. .,-. -PLAT • W - PpKR TRAxig'—O yT 5A' - b br • gf OE vACA20) y1 - P T 9AULF o { €k *.% /' C E CLkJR7 A� R mP - s ARv MWO uANH - I _ 4 ShfPTARY SERER YTER L pi I$' '-x•y - S€ MY NAAE: COOPER Ci r r/ / ' :��•+� q Nf.N � . SPOT ELCYA M lQP W LW jj 111 1A I1P . SPO EOW PpN TOP of Ay1NA,T q� 5 ^uiw b4�mx�pFrai o 0� f / �/ aE cF. T I iii �' i f T �' - exNecRuez T 11 LOT 1$ Lal 17 Y 'LOT 16- Y LOT Y -LOT 4 Y - --- L0712 „ LWi 61 NABR DRlY,6 bA7x SF a>b $219 q bare sF $z4b s 9.. -EF iaj9re g r.aaa sr v 42 - -- j- 1NTE�R�C P�rrawxRtl 66 a on Ri slRAiiIX1 - +9azw rWAQ CA -%P (MASS CAP !•liE �x '� T�1 F.LpE Y-+9i.Y9' B �� I LRNEA CgjGW�UI `�I']eljl'.-�, HGM ]41 4p -+ I Ril9c pf ICARffG CAWN 5/E' Kom R -ES PHA ! WMWD 'OE"" B/��S dF L4AMW tll Y, ca-a:.'z Fsa*€s air pr PAsca l NCW i4 9Ai4111 E1FY-913.1 b' FUAwNNi A i1rREE-SECd10 FdTAL SFATION NOTES � ?{pCW RAPER RO[ M. Lim QE L0 �a 0M, N'LM aa9b sc Pp6A 5. 1 SCONSU l t, C � 1 � � PREWIHARY PLAT FOR LOP 6� OF tlff PLAT W ME'S E3TAPE5 REOf D LOT SOE LAR 5` LOS 16; 1A,13R SF FAMO. wA 9931>< l 6ardown Crmatalt&w, LLC '0 SAJYDIFUR PARKWAY w YOL 1 a KAM AT RACE r+, KCOR05 W LOT aN AY AC IIAW s rv'WE sw-619-+633 pT4 PRAT AC.ff ' era ApAES +�1 TRA TTDM SUR VEYANC FRANIUAI Lw91Am, wAsnNcrw. � f4 / — — rvmF MTH Mu yi — TO EA�11ERiA B�A�mN I � T525 n: OESC19fTE5 PL NH IC MESEMYAnp€S. CO4gNAN15 AI) MlStt6CTe S, o ft4 U.CAP FEE?; 57s' anR .ucwaaiwa. Lts 'PA r@- A/,fPPINC PT' (Q j "Co" Alp IH MEN. Kim AK,- x% fl'/ $$] ALNES FASP'l. 14i 49]43 x[NNEWLK 9h B4]:19 `D -QR*UND U1W1;5 SHPM1 lULV( 9reAl IL.A' iCb IRON Fff1D LLdtm P*eONC: 549-619-hb33 5g9j !3'r ]394 INDEX x6 it04. TW 91[u "YAKS - WMMIEE THAT Teff "Wh OFv f. IN{9047 ]S1-4560 N uTuICS 4 d.1 ALL SUCH .1 NS n W MEA.P8A[R: FAR 4 4ESP1 gyp, Put 31L1afl N .LBW'S 41 ABAA041F®.. 1K SUR1Ertlt PO WR p s NOT TELCNCNL CNARPW bel} PURCFN bLW.. 9117.. { Y % �t i. R •b99Pv1 A)1Fi O 4013 •Ai iK 41'IKRA1d UTM1]9C5 SNB1W AAC 9F TE ElACT R11W: Qix Q v;9CA1lO A.INGION LIE OOF3 �RTfY PNAT Tffv ARE LOnJ1TE0 CA9: CASCJ,pE NAFURAL GAS PASCO. NA 993pf aiC4'I AS P03�6E ANOM TI6: Aif0161A0011 AVARABIE. ilA6 PHp•'.: a49/5A]-p114 UAL 11/11/15 91i. 1 a 7 FAz• 509/aW9-1114 O I" Aqf In1Y9CALLY LpCAlEO 1HE IAl6EPCJtOII'O URLITES � � �. � (MAWu (1' pq Al 14599 ti• 1V ' }' r r..• �Z! q a�'c It if If It e Al i.].- '. v - CdIJIfr ldl Tee.f 61 �T if, it I.If% '1 f ' t r ., r •T. _ _,y,(1 htll...e ` 4e 4 �dK d ' y - - }e v... _ 4 !' .•. tf - �.._ - 1 f ; {. 1xx•yt YE 4 ,r M.y°1.' _q, �Yi' .X' f. dray '�Ci,; c r \ J I if ; ✓ G iJt' � r', t ' � �' i M H T � � z $. � y l' J� 1l � a 1 r , r IT L< f' ,� -5.'f.J - ' q .r .. - (' ti J/ r '-` .t.! •, • :{ - ,d t'. l i. �� i1.4 ,1 'i '.r :`L t, .F•� i — -t }a.l ,d }s- h. - '., ,1' ~r , • ( ,� -� 4 r �. 1 y1 r _ Sl , �. - i I .� 1' 1 �,ti.r r� ".ri '�/-.i-''I "}'' , n- .a tow �! J- �j��'.•`r �.\.. Jry-L-„. ri;.. .i. 'i''. �. -.: � �_- �'�/�� I.ly. �, �- - '7^ { �_ r}'d� � t_ +�A ri _ �' S. /R V� , : , ., � ., '.�� a i �,,. l •. I - f }� * p} _:. h.. �����:5 _ f � -.- ) - ` ,I_tI,•!, - C' :'\",. '�)_,. i ,.. e- ,• _r ; - 'Tt rjl. I 1 7�-J 't• I �- _ - , X14 n�,� rd "/ .M'. I' ( ld 4 } �{_ :} f., �r .._t °� I� 1, �, ,t I,,r--. .�^ rl. '.; }: HT1 red . ::, �:'� .i.. , t;'.vi ,'v 1. „ \ py''C ;Y• �. 'r'n:�/,�• ,_'� ^41� j -a 'Y �. ,,r. �:1.,- .f'� tr .14. 't., 'I u3. .1 S ^-'r 1, - 1 [,.I''- ,' !` - .. i' e� / -f l' :�''-• . , .6 , � .. .. P f i. � .= A. q l• t. -L, Y (l ; v l: i ` l' ' If i T, �` - :',y,Y '. t, t -.' '' _ "f �.i`:,. ri- - I' 1. •f'.'�. y.l_'1 L r - h 'I1 ,. I ,. �R f. •� •- \'4l,'.i I 'f' 1' '] A't' - 1 x, did It �q ,• J' •^J ;_ :{ ,i .A $. d'-' :cr _•• } �1� fr,• __ 'r` , 'ln 'i .:f' { :'4 rJjY..! _ } f ah- 10 It 0{ G{ :It •Y:'- .I. r :i. .. ,d L �'� �.r 'n� � �*' 1 �' 1 'r ^! ra. !)' 1. r "� Y I "c. jt ; { rif �'_ �{ Y p y Tf '¢ II %(¢yj� ,�tir" � a J` }. c a� i' r 'f l' 1 .li T_ jed,N ,, ,1. •.f, \ h �}'y ee '! is Y 'i dllje�, P�:: tdo ' n .. 1.1 1 , II ({fy� i(' 'Y: �y R -'�l ITT`r I 4t v •' If -�' 14 t%fleF.i 'I:�i ,. - �. 1 .I” dieN'I r 1• f 1- , /r• 1 \Aside .r ...4-d.- i ' a . :*�P I'I ,'-'J,�.. },2� �',y 1-C .A \ r di f: ,... ,_ 't ;"`'IJ `Y'•.`y,' 4- _4'. :1 ° , ` € d'%- „ ! ,i'' q, 1 Al'\ 1" "4 L — ':�1�. ...'(a, r dc•a •, ->, �./. f ,r t •IY C ,' "6'I .I f� j `t I: - `. -rr f r F''I !.' f v !: ', tI': r1 r �'' +� Y _ .4 .1 - i,( L I.f^ y- /r 7. ,�.. II , `. rri. l• - loed-%': : d (' I" 'IIII/I t :lv 1i. L, - 'T -r.,7, ._,. ' �. �,., \ 1 �1.! •C1 .' y�+, t:_ �Pl v. i, �.a1-'iC - .{p. i .4 cP".� 'I�F' II'1 (-'AI P, ,I, \-S. J.. 1. 1'.7, jr •r �r 11�r. ',^f _.1 (., ,�1_ - - ''-'F,. �� • 1 d / t , , . I tl : T e. l '1 .. S r . 1 `` . ,' :� �I, i .4. �� 1 - � . 1, I � '\ 'a ' I , ! - ,! __ h IL• j�I.rt.i `• \i. :I-`, i I• I .rt•,. FI K, N .A t' t. / '"i+_'S�1, r'if (3�� j11YY Y i' Y .I', if If 7.. t•' -•i �I' -v d(�l 1 ^f' i �' /\_'J -D n 'Y' l;l:.0--d 1) .r Ir ,f •:h ',l +P.�� r^ ,/ II- n �y '1 •�f-`J}v:`'�, ! �T) 'e °I Yif L v1 .I�. tr r 1{I �.1 �. e:.+r - L 11 - ,r ', r p _ I '\''i" 1 l h f ' Tr.. L , - ! . -,` • f i , _ _ 1 �y'I'*r. 1 fl. _ i , /; :r J.. 'd ' , -t: �- yti,• "'n R- :, / r ; - i { 'V,` '' 1�VJ 1..• _( v: - -� .+.q:.f .y iI 1.'•- `\ , fi r r �,..;.. F Y /_- !. } ' , / I _ = �. k1�.-_";1 ��",:-``I -951" .M f ,J,:� ! �,} 9'' / '-t' :.f- !• !1 ..'.-�, '1-=.- % .,„- 7' �.. t 1; i ,! �: :T .. f d.r il'� _I. ,_r ,_+ t-., Y, ,4,i 1•: i., th 1,S l- I� 1 did . It t 1 �. / deed Aelf I ', A !.' f��{ \' : eF �. ••- y.' _( p,.• n II - ,.N.'• \ 'rIIN �, �q o �. /. 1 .� y�};y F•ii I-�r r/..,I 4-x f I��, ,I, IF ..w�", C/.1IIII 11 lih. J (. `, I_'� ;f \'+�. '�\ ' _-l��l. �i 7_r.1. S• 'R_ae A, P,: -! ,1tr _l r' _;1(..1� '"�6' nl `f r. t i1 I �l .,I' ; \I\.; 1� ,. .R : 'dI J - f,�. dIL^f: _ �k Y Y/ .> I. �.. ,.1111\. .I`, r.%.. 1' I''. - .I \ 11 r I ..,h ,r'_\il ��.. 1: •'�..: i. i 4 }i h` 1 If j l \ _... y; fed' 4 /. ,1^ .` -- ' !! 1 (lig I f'I 1 j`�`V 1, I�1 ,, rl _. I' 4 rri 'I. 1 I' ^ I. I ! r f r I It i VIA an I If I VAN No IV Act V IN y to IN It .,,;_;Lay .;i� yj L ` �•y IN ,.4� Nat < �Valan I .. .j .. �, •¢, \ �Dl%-.- Yea d .t��. rr {'li lr.If AV9•NI, A .. x ,yZY'kalill �INI � alf If gm w IV 4 lei t3t. If sir Fes.11ASJ •,� ,�''.'lJ' '\� J'; �' .a 7 4. .. It r; In -•ice .. J; aft v� a �, '!' e . i� ,`n -i�• Rp flat .may'.5P .a H .N IN 11 INNAIL.23- w,3� r y� G - IL It I ♦ T < _ 1� ��.csp1_r� _. e ams, -,d VIAr+'r $�r `-Y c'fd a r -'.T', ' I•' �e'+o5 _ cIf al as V I IN I Al AI INA IN -��� It j;e t, +,e v _ MrAC• +�`. > - � n e ♦ '' . _ t 'r ,-Ar IN IN L'f-'}Ca4 ABIN NN lar na At IN A _ i. . �. •ems > - 1 � ! 9 _ r' la •J�(a f( �— AV INN IN all! ANN" al Nr IF IN ANA 40 vNi If IN Not te VAN gal dr. `.iVreT-T"i{i.;r Hr 1', na si btnc � . .. FI. e' _. Looking ast Ike,rN4�' _ �u�iGy.. ' Lam' - I ». ,w _ _ - NN IN i III p AN VIA n AlANN wIN, Ar ; �r . .0A '�'.w '.-. !'�6. ' ti• i''�` �" '^-' '•„ 4. 'f',hOld „ Al �. AV 01" LLLL ._~ - ; - It AV N A aft AN *&%N It IN li-- ....., , nt a•a.;c-,- 3 - •: Mcg t j:lCit)�.lir'i!� y�� is �! }r 1tr Pn� -�ry .E•Y t r'r !!, IN IV �. . til'It i �v��4 r., It :r< `r; 4H 'h�,+� ', IiQ�,f!I ILL ^`•E' :„'• t, is e: j f, , :ti, _ IFI 1 y lj� '�J.`y'J p L - � `{• �ay /`It All 11V1'+, .IN :.:�\� l rV �[g' t �•�; V �.y �11 �•nr'4 �1�. ', ... 'tai --'Y a..'x='%: +. :It hV Alm IH �';.2' 4 „L , ,. ''vf'• .1 4,' . l rt .y �'. .. , . 11 u .. I J ` � 1 h r i' 9 t' ,tl 1V i , T +• ' ti a:•s•Y ..4 ne•�:.l,t la 5.. ..•.t; r ,y ... - 9 uM4 IN I ••, V '. �: r, Nt ti, �dWA, Na IN I It M anal If nrIN trq It Il'ie t LJ'1 - [I li.. 'iI YI .. ' AIN 0.7 If 00 3 ,t tAj d �,��4', 11 Lqq F•! p l k,. , l ei •.:- SID.. y iI ` ,F1 i P � r,. S71iISR1f .. ,L 7 In ar _ ' f5i �f rf.f A! qa ^, .�2 ''11'*y ♦ `( �`'` .;IX :;:9 mo�w, ]]1�1.' r ` �1(''ll�. ip'•y,Jl`,Iyy,1/� �.y\` ``��4 �, •,I:l 'ty if qtr''.• t: A, 7°�6 ,Lk ,. . ' �I�S.... -,i e•: Gl 1r1 I,:f_IUI. \_ \N Ic L15. ,Ha 3,z .., SA F t . k a + V J X. ti ��� '!. 1-34 yY rein ~.r IN rY. { -I o-yYi ��; .tet• :`y ;• - �,Nt '- e R,._ 3 •t. r - - — - -- If It- PFFFFFF fR•' fes.1r - , , ,> T • 4�,�� � T' _ _ l' f a. � `'G .. •VIS. If Ilk F 116 At ! y Y S _ •�Gp� y LI fl .,� If , Y r If Ile F7 9 r'-, Ir - jIl�;or 'r'..t .•.� Etiy ~ -_t"_ LYi! L'v 'tili �,,��1 ♦ti Irn Yf 1 `f y� .15 - 1y � w.-,: . � - - t,z;3.fiS P'. _ .ti`4. ' �. '�' ��.-�."F�'. F^ .,.� S�� � � ih4. r �y � W �''�a 4." '. � __' Vie•- t _; n � � E ;�, ref"' '7Ya �` t y'�` � �l 6 - r w �7y� ,������-ti�R_� , `Ts , '� ` 1. _.k._.•� t ��- r -- � �,afr •. _ __ ;� �!1 /i .'1 -.�- _ ���r.�' - �N`i,''��� a• - � , 'tit Ile L rry- � �.. - '�Y fy •1 I •^ s, � e.",`�7�Fw•- 3. Y'' f • �l` S- If "Alf ! 1�+ '• ..ty13` ym O.. ��,A'�16 al y t �W' a{*'•�r�Q� 7a.� rm f LIT IV iE 4a�2 . -;/i"' _ .,8. y r _ .-'-i'1' tet." -..'!1L T� �..s��'y- x+ •'• •t'C _ ..Y ,Mt'I t�`G _ r . v. N r: �. _ .i...R n••.,fr.. wv.-' /^'<<y�- y�' ham. - _ s•:..Will 411111.� A _. ,µ -' ll ^ J•JQ oallbotd. - I - �x iY R �t 4;67P - lT+_ .i pJ; 1`. -- X - - �- a -. - -: _ . • Yi :v r�N !e^•�R-;- - •i � . _ C . ._....�,,..!�Fsa... _. - t _ , If _ A s4 ' 1. ,14 r TI t fm ` .fir-•tc I�, t _.ol IL If - - - - - - If qI 10 If If } i / - •'7, It I If III, - If IV -IN Ir yyy YI' i I If PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING B. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat for Coles Estates, Lot 6 (Bardown Consulting LLC) (MF# PP 2015-005) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the preliminary plat application for Coles Estates, Lot 6. The applicant is requesting the property to be rezoned to R-1 and the proposal is to run a cul-de-sac with single-family homes similar to the surrounding developments. The lots would all meet the minimum square footage requirements for R-1 zoning, actually exceeding the average lot size. The staff report addresses the layout, utilities, schools, parks, travel ways and sidewalks. There are additional findings of fact in this staff report relating to nuisances and dust control as well as other items from the Pasco Municipal Code. These findings of fact used to be listed under conditions in previous preliminary plat applications; however, since they are addressed in the municipal code, they can be listed under findings of fact instead. Commissioner Portugal asked for clarification on water rights and irrigation. Mr. McDonald responded that the lots would receive city irrigation. The developer doesn't currently have water rights so they will pay fees to the city and the city will purchase the water rights. Typically if the developer has the water rights they would dedicate them to the city. With no further questions or comments the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Polk, to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the January 21, 2016 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1/21/16 B. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat for Coles Estates, Lot 6 (Bardown Consulting LLC) (MF# PP 2015-0051 Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the preliminary plat for Coles Estates, Lot 6. There were no additional comments. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The -1- Page 225 of 252 motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Bowers moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the preliminary plat for Road 84 Estates with conditions as listed in the January 21, 2016 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. -2- Page 226 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Chapel Hill Boulevard Extension - Resolution for LID I. REFERENCE(S): Area Map - DNR Property Chapel Hill Boulevard Road Cross Section Resolution January 25, 2016 Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. declaring the intent of the City to order the improvements of Chapel Hill Boulevard (from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, and Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard). III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Staff and and representatives from Department of Natural Resources (DNR) have been working for a number of years to create opportunities for development of DNR property that is situated west of Road 68, south of I-182, east of Road 84 and north of Argent Road. The property is approximately 350 acres and has been farmed for a number of years. The property is surrounded by development and is located within a prime location for commercial and residential development. The Washington State Legislature has passed legislation requiring DNR to auction the residential portion of the property for development. Currently, DNR plans to retain ownership of the commercially zoned property, amounting to approximately 50 acres. Page 227 of 252 In 2014, the City coordinated with DNR on zoning of the property and partitioning of the property into large lots in order to facilitate its sale at auction. Staff completed a 5% design roadway alignment for necessary right-of-way exhibits for Chapel Hill and Road 76. In summer 2015, approximately 260 acres of the residential portion of the property was advertised for auction. Unfortunately, no bids were submitted through the process. DNR worked closely with City staff in the ensuing months to evaluate the failure of the auction and strategize for a more successful auction event this spring. DNR has taken some positive steps to improve the process, a major one being to hire a professional auctioneer to facilitate the process. In the lessons learned category, one of the most important questions identified over the past several months has been whether a plan for development of the necessary public infrastructure to serve this large area would help to make the project more viable. A number of major public improvements have been identified for the site, including the continuation of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84, extension of Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard, and sufficient utilities (water, sewer, storm sewer and irrigation) to serve future site development. A primary question is: How will the cost for necessary roadways and utilities be funded? Typically a developer completes public improvements as part of a subdivision. However, with such a large site, and a number of potential developers, it is vital that the roadway improvements are completed during the initial phase of the development. The need for the infrastructure was confirmed with DNR and their auctioneer consultant during our numerous meetings. The property is more attractive for bidding and will increase the value of the land if there is a plan in place to assure needed public improvements are addressed. During discussions with DNR staff, the idea of establishing a Local Improvement District (LID) as a mechanism to fund the roadway and utility improvements was proposed. DNR is receptive to the idea of an LID. City Staff has completed a number of LID projects throughout the city utilizing the "petition method". The petition method is typically a lengthy process as it entails the collection of petitions from a sufficient number of property owners within a given boundary. However, in the case of the DNR property, there is only one property owner with a few parcels. The process can be expedited through the "resolution method" where the City Council orders the improvements and assesses the benefited properties, in this case, the DNR property, for the cost of the improvements to be paid back over a set number of years. Page 228 of 252 Staff has developed a very preliminary cost estimate with the 5% road alignment design for the project. This phase of the LID will include roadway improvements and utilities for Chapel Hill from Road 68 to Road 84 with sidewalks, streetlights, landscaping, traffic signals, if they are warranted, and landscaped medians. The improvements will also be similar for Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill. The typical roadway section for Chapel Hill Boulevard will be designated as a principal arterial facility with a five lane roadway, bike lanes, and sidewalk within a 100 to 105 foot right-of-way. Road 76 will be designated as a minor arterial with a three lane roadway including sidewalks, street lights and landscaping within 80 feet of right-of- way. The preliminary estimated cost for the outlined public infrastructure is approximately $13.5 million, which includes design, project management, 15% contingencies, major utilities such as water, sewer, irrigation, storm sewer, and associated roadway improvements. The total improvements will be made to approximately 6,600 feet for Chapel Hill Boulevard and approximately 2,900 feet for Road 76. V. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution enabling improvements of infrastructure needed to facilitate development of the DNR property and establish assessments for all the properties in preparation for the upcoming auction in April 2016. The resolution requires DNR to complete the improvements through the LID process. The City will continue to apply for and seek any other funding sources which may become available. This item was discussed at the January 25, 2016 Council meeting. Page 229 of 252 v CD N w 0 15.60' 0 \ 50' N 89° 15' 45" E 2625.87' S 66 S6>7S F ?8S4 ?8 R50' i rn I I I o 00 N I w I 00 O I i� o � z CO 0 I I 64 50 �\ &I 38 F l� 78 O 78, -I N 89° 17' 14" E 1319. 140' R/W FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES I LOT 3 00 21.47 Acres I 1322.08' S pFR MARC/N R�IMgp �q �F cq� CU / p\ �gTFO 100' R/W FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILI 7 II LOT 2 �I 102.72 Acres N 89° 17' 14" E 2644.16' 00 0 ICIA 0 rn I� 0 O 9 ju S ss Lis CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC LENGTH Cl 5°40'00" 537.28' 53.14' C2 9°20'00" 442.59' 72.10' C3 26°40'00" 143.32' 66.70' C4 10°50'00" 313.65' 59.30' C5 20°40'00" 83.30' 30.05' C6 25° 10'00" 83.32' 36.60' C7 20°50'00" 171.79' 62.46' C8 35°30'00" 143.39' 88.84' C9 28°20'00" 64.45' 31.87' C10 27°30'00" 64.42' 30.92' C 1 1 1 *25'15" 110.97' 2.97' C12 64°47' 1 1 " 500.00' 565.37' C13 85°39'07" 550.00' 822.20' C14 55°48'07" 550.00' 535.66' C15 53°26'29" 500.00' 466.36' C16 38°57'45" 900.00' 612.02' C17 21°29'49" 520.00' 195.10' C18 41°40'42" 540.00' 392.81' C19 26'13'19 " 340.00' 155.60' C20 39°53'32" 490.00' 1 341.16' C21 02°54' 18" 2865.00' 1 145.26' �\ \� LOT 1 �4 76 II 37.86 Acres 1 -P o I �� ('d O � o I hry LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 76°37'50" E 36.41' L2 S 70°57'50" E 1064.42' L3 S 61°37'50" E 192.19' L4 S 61`37'50" E 94.85' L5 S 88°17'50" E 96.38' L6 N 80°52'10" E 107.96' L7 S 78°27'50" E 40.37' L8 S 53°17'50" E 87.37' L9 S 74°07'50" E 38.20' L10 N 70°22'10" E 127.55' L11 S 81°17'50" E 316.05' L12 S 53°47'50" E 83.51' L13 S 52°54'05" E 206.16' L14 S 66°56'15" E 100.00' L15 S 66°56'15" E 270.00' L16 S 68°38'07" E 143.05' L17 S 44`16'40" E 133.64' L18 N 86°23'21 " E 173.44' L19 N 78`20'30" E 100.00' L20 S 87°29'37" E 87.36' L21 S 87°29'37" E 7.61' L22 N 24°31'45" W 85.64' AMENDMENT PASCO 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY THIS SEGREGATION SURVEY IS TO AMEND AND REPLACE "PASCO 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED UNDER AFN. 1828912 RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE NEW LOT CONFIGURATION CREATES 7 LOTS INSTEAD OF 11 LOTS. 1" = 400 FEET 0 200 400 800 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM SOUTH ZONE, NAD83/91 BASIS OF BEARING: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES: WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83/91 SOUTH ZONE DATA TRIMBLE R8/2 GPS RECEIVER. INITIAL CONTROL POINTS FROM FRANKLIN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT WERE ESTABLISHED FROM TIES TO THE WSRN NETWORK CONTROL POINT NO. 1511 N: 341159.34 E: 1974390.99 AND THEN CONSTRAINED TO FRANKLIN REGIONAL CONTROL CONTROL POINT N0. 1507 N: 339246.30 E: 1969027.01 POINT NO'S: 1511 AND 1507. CORNERS WERE DUALLY TIED TO to tP ESTABLISH 2 MEASUREMENTS. THE RELATIVE ACCURACY I i r\ 0. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCE STANDARDS WERE MET AS SPECIFIED IN WAC 332-130-080. Oa 0 6550 o� 655p�� Z COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.99991342 �' LEGEND: v' I I LOT 7 0�� �� 0-0-00FOUND MONUMENT. C S 00°32'53" W o N 265.06' 59.50 Acres \ R50' I I R50' + C>0<1 CALCULATED CORNER � L21 C18 L18 09 ( O FOUND REBARS NOT ACCEPTED C __ - S 89° 17' 14" W 2642.59' 1 74 L20 1 (� \ \ 5' 75` FOUND ROADWAY MONUMENTS R50 \ 4 II 40 I- 40 \ SEE SHEET 3 FOR CORNER NOTES \� v'� / wll I oQ o gyp; 0 1�� \0 0)0 00100' R50' �' N / SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES to R/W rl O I I N 00 \ FOR INGRESS, po � O I (6 �_ w w p �S� 50 EGRESS AND UTILITIES Co _ Ol o z Q `� \ _� - _ _ CHAPEL HILL BLVD /� y o,� "2 4 5 OI I o O \ S 85°07'59" / 3 = z l l N o 356.76'_ E 1285.87 7 --- 426.81'-- ---------1677.93'--------- w 50 w - - - -929.1 1 '_ _ - - II moo / -- ---------------------- 00 O of / - o w 1 L \ w Co / / N r _ z `. 5 In O I LOT 4 r / / / / co I Lo COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION ro/LOT 6 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON o ?98 44 \ X80' R/W FOR INGRESS,, 1 IF 38.09 Acres / \ z M 1 C1 \ EGRESS AND UTILITIES'l z / / 13.11 ACRES \ I COUNTY OF THURSTON 16 2� N 1046.97' \ " N 1 RP��F I, PETER GOLDMARK, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ACTING FOR THE DEPARTMENT Lu N 89.17'40" E OF NAT .• RAL RESOURCES, IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY TIF 01 7 / THAT THE MAP ENTITLED 'AMENDMENT PASCO 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY, UPON WHICH Ln N \ \ THIS CERTIFICATE IS INSCRIBED, IS PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF - _ N 34°40'19" E RADIAL o I 2 L5- \ -t oo\ \ WASHINGTON STATE LAWS, 2013 2ND SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 19, SECTION 3238 z o I I I C3 C4 C5C6 L12\ - 110.97' 0 FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PER CHAPTER 79.11 RCW. 00 L4 C C9 _ - _ - - I oq IT IS ALSO NOTED THAT A DULY AUTHENTICATED COPY OF THIS MAP SHALL BE FILED � I I I I L9 C8 C70 = _ - -�\ _ _ i 00 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE i I I o // / \ \\ i - ORIGINAL COPY SHALL BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC ct / / C11 w LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WA. Q � I w Q I I SEE SHEET 2 I o w // I N O I FOR DETAIL o w z I LOT 5 / / I M WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE -------- DAY OF --------------_ I I ro o ,, 0 30.05 Acres // 0 01 N 2015. I OI / / o z o � I ro 0 / / 0000 Z li I o II oma' /00 A(DNR CR -2446) 30' I I I z u / 30' IT9N., R,29E. f-- 30'(DNR CR -2446)) 30' (DNR CR -2446) 3� PETER COMMISGOLDMSIONER RK 88 R/W PIPE LINE EASEMENT 50' I I -� R50'77 COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ---------------- - ----\ =J =1315.49' TO C/L PROPOSED NEW ROAD= _ _ No1S 89° 17'39" W 1330.33' } S 89° 17'44" W 1330.40' } N 89-18'04" E 1330.13 N 89° 18'23" E 1329.79' 16 ARGENT ROAD L 30' (DNR CR -3095) `-- / AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF AT M. IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 2016 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN JANUARY, 2016 45158 FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPUTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER ' RYNEA L. EDWARDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER WAS4 ti a.d b' o 45158 Q�GISTEgE..�'4` TONAL LA1D SEGREGATION SURVEY IN SECTION 16 TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W. M. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAND SURVEY SECTION-P.O. BOX 47030 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7030 (360)902-1206 PASCO 16 FIELD CREW. - FIELD BOOK: 1 /06/2016 F.M.# 1848.2 SHEET 1 OF 3 ns' 5 12" 12- 5" n.5' 7 / J IL IL IL IL 5' D / CHAPEL HILL BLVD 2—WAY LEFT TURN SECTION Alnr Tn Cr AI C / D 5IL IL IL ROAD 76 2—WAY LEFT TURN SECTION NOT TO SCALE IL IL IL IL 5. O CHdPFI 14111 Rnlll FVdRD SFCTION I< Iz ROAD 76 BOULEVARD SECTION s NOT TO SCALE O_ Z LL, w Z M w� L0 ® Y � O 3: N J� m CL DRAWN BY: GTR DESIGN BY: NA GTR CHECKED BY:NA HOR SCALE: 1"=40' VER SCALE: 1 "=4' SHEET 13 13 CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE IMPROVEMENTS OF CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD (FROM ROAD 68 TO ROAD 84, INCLUDING THE INTERSECTION WITH ROAD 76, AND ROAD 76 FROM ARGENT ROAD TO CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD) TO CREATE A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO ASSESS THE COST AND EXPENSE OF CARRYING OUT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SPECIALLY BENEFITTED THEREBY; AND, NOTIFYING ALL PERSONS WHO DESIRE TO OBJECT TO THE IMPROVEMENTS TO APPEAR AND PRESENT THEIR OBJECTIONS AT A HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON MARCH 7, 2016. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, as follows: Section I. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, to order the improvement of the property within the area described in Exhibit A, by the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard (from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, and Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard). The improvements are more fully described in Exhibit B, and consist of full roadway improvements that includes road construction to three lane and five lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, bike lanes and landscaping (collectively, the "Improvements"). The referenced Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof.- All ereof: All of the foregoing Improvements shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications therefore prepared by the City Engineer of the City and may be modified by the City as long as that modification does not affect the purpose of the improvements. Section 2. The total estimated cost and expense of the Improvements is declared to be $13,427,125, of which an estimated $13,427,125 million shall be borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by the Improvements to be included in a local improvement district to be established and embracing as nearly as practicable all the property specially benefited by the Improvements. Actual assessments may vary from estimated assessments as long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value the Improvements add to the property. Section 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of the adoption of this resolution and of the date, time and place fixed herein for the public hearing to each owner or reputed owner of any lot, tract, parcel of land or other property within the proposed local improvement district by mailing such notice at least fifteen days before the date fixed for public hearing to the owner or reputed owner of the property as shown on the rolls of the Franklin County Assessor at the address shown thereon, as required by law. Page 232 of 252 This resolution also shall be published in its entirety in at least two consecutive issues of the official newspaper of the City, the date of the first publication to be at least 15 days prior to the date fixed herein for the public hearing. Section 4. All persons who may desire to object to the Improvements are notified to appear and present those objections at a hearing before the City Council to be held in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, 525 N. 3rd Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at 7:00 p.m. on March 7, 2016, which time and place are fixed for hearing all matters relating to the Improvements and all objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the Improvements. All persons who object thereto should appear and present their objections at that hearing. Any person who may desire to file a written protest with the City Council may do so within 30 days after the date of passage of the ordinance ordering the Improvements in the event the local improvement district is formed. The written protest should be signed by the property owner and should include the legal description of the property for which the protest is filed and that protest should be delivered to the City Clerk. The City Engineer is directed to submit to the City Council on or prior to March 7, 2016, all data and information required by law to be submitted. The foregoing resolution was ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof this 1St day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 233 of 252 a I n � $ � I O o � I N 89'15'45" E 2625.87- 6 i B 478 CR50' �/'s 6�HgpF zj3s. 50' V �R/W FOR INC EGRESS AND /r �I n LOT 2 , 3 N 89'1714" E 1319.62' 102.72 Acres I ' 1� 40- R O m < /W FOR INGRESS, I I Q I EGRESS AND UTILITIES 1 1 O I - �' I � LOT 7 LOT 3 S 00'32'53" W \ w\ I 265.06' 59.50 Acres 21.47 Acres \ \ \ R=0' \ j R50' \ L21 LOT 1 ' 37.86 Acres LZD I (\ 2\ 40 � CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE AMENDMENT LINE BEARING DISTANCE PASCO 16 Ll S 76'37'50"E 36.41' L2 S 71.57.50• E 1164.42' SEGREGATION SURVEY L3 S 61'37'50" E 192.19' L4 5 61'37'50" E 94.85' LS S 88'17'50 E 96.38' 16 N 8952'10" E 107.96' L7 S 78'27'50" E 40.37' La S 53'17'50" E 87.37' THIS SEGREGATION SURVEY IS TO L9 S 74'0750" E 38.20' AMEND AND REPLACE "PASCO 16 u1 N 7927'50" E 127.55' L11 S 81'17'50" E 316. 05' SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED UNDER L12 S 53'47'51" E 03.51' AFH. 1628912 RECORDS OF L13 S 52'54405" E 206.16' FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. L14 S 66056'15" E 501.OV THE NEW LOT CONFIGURATION L15 S 66'56'15" E 270.00' CREATES 7 LOTS INSTEAD OF 11 L16 S 68'38'07" E 143.05' LOTS. L17 S 44'16'40 E 133.64' LIB N 862321" E 173.44' 119 N 78'20'30" E 100.00' L20 S BT29'37" E 87.36' 1" = 400 FEET L21 S 87'29'37" E 7.61' L22 N 24'31'45' WT 85.64' 0 200 400. 800 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM SOUTH ZONE. NA063191 BASIS OF BEARING: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES: WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 83/91 SOUTH ZONE DATA THIMBLE R8/2 GPS RECEIVER. INITIAL CONTROL POINTS FROM FRANKLIN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT WERE ESTABLISHED FROM RES TO THE WSRN NETWORK CONTROL POINT N0. 1511 N. 341159.34 E. 1974390.99 AND THEN CONSTRAINED TO FRANKLIN REGIONAL CONTROL CONTROL POINT NO. 1507 N:339246.30 E. 1969027.01 POINT NO'S: 1511 AND 1501 CORNERS WERE DUALLY TIED TO ESTABLISH 2 MEASUREMENTS. THE RELATIVE ACCURACY DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCE STANDARDS WERE MET AS SPECIFIED IN WAC 331-130-080. COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.99991342 LEGEND: N� � FOUND MONUMENT. f + �4 CALCULATED CORNER S 09'17'14" W 2642.59' 1l5 7 11 o, R50' R 1 \ /W FOR INGRESS, \ 50 I ^I EORESS AND UDUIIES - CHAPEL E HILL BLVD --S 85'0759" 356.76'- 1285.87' 7 50 J__ ----929.11- LOT 4 38.09 Acres K C11 LOT 5 / / I 30.05 Acres I I wAUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE cc FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 2016 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR CD UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS 'NI OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE R/1\FOR\N\RESS, ��2984 4 EGRESS `ND UBLIVES_ I WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (� 1 =80' Cl \70597, � I I O COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION 45158 RYNEA L. EDWARDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER FRANKON COUNTY DEPUTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER b I - o 2 I II13 D4 1 o ol I SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL 3 to m II � �Iloa� I-- 30'(DNR QR -2446)& ---------------- -2446) J III Q(ONR CR 30' /8\ R/W PIPE UNE EASEMENT 50' \ ={I--`=_________ ==J z 30' I R50' 131 s:49' 5 89'1]'39" W 1330.33' ARGENT ROAD S 89'1544" W 1330.40' 30'(ONR CR -3095)Q �-- / N CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE AMENDMENT LINE BEARING DISTANCE PASCO 16 Ll S 76'37'50"E 36.41' L2 S 71.57.50• E 1164.42' SEGREGATION SURVEY L3 S 61'37'50" E 192.19' L4 5 61'37'50" E 94.85' LS S 88'17'50 E 96.38' 16 N 8952'10" E 107.96' L7 S 78'27'50" E 40.37' La S 53'17'50" E 87.37' THIS SEGREGATION SURVEY IS TO L9 S 74'0750" E 38.20' AMEND AND REPLACE "PASCO 16 u1 N 7927'50" E 127.55' L11 S 81'17'50" E 316. 05' SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED UNDER L12 S 53'47'51" E 03.51' AFH. 1628912 RECORDS OF L13 S 52'54405" E 206.16' FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. L14 S 66056'15" E 501.OV THE NEW LOT CONFIGURATION L15 S 66'56'15" E 270.00' CREATES 7 LOTS INSTEAD OF 11 L16 S 68'38'07" E 143.05' LOTS. L17 S 44'16'40 E 133.64' LIB N 862321" E 173.44' 119 N 78'20'30" E 100.00' L20 S BT29'37" E 87.36' 1" = 400 FEET L21 S 87'29'37" E 7.61' L22 N 24'31'45' WT 85.64' 0 200 400. 800 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM SOUTH ZONE. NA063191 BASIS OF BEARING: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES: WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 83/91 SOUTH ZONE DATA THIMBLE R8/2 GPS RECEIVER. INITIAL CONTROL POINTS FROM FRANKLIN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT WERE ESTABLISHED FROM RES TO THE WSRN NETWORK CONTROL POINT N0. 1511 N. 341159.34 E. 1974390.99 AND THEN CONSTRAINED TO FRANKLIN REGIONAL CONTROL CONTROL POINT NO. 1507 N:339246.30 E. 1969027.01 POINT NO'S: 1511 AND 1501 CORNERS WERE DUALLY TIED TO ESTABLISH 2 MEASUREMENTS. THE RELATIVE ACCURACY DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCE STANDARDS WERE MET AS SPECIFIED IN WAC 331-130-080. COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.99991342 LEGEND: N� � FOUND MONUMENT. f + �4 CALCULATED CORNER S 09'17'14" W 2642.59' 1l5 7 11 o, R50' R 1 \ /W FOR INGRESS, \ 50 I ^I EORESS AND UDUIIES - CHAPEL E HILL BLVD --S 85'0759" 356.76'- 1285.87' 7 50 J__ ----929.11- LOT 4 38.09 Acres K C11 LOT 5 / / I 30.05 Acres I /LOT 6 o / / J 13.11 ACRES / /6 6 / 1046.97- N 89'1740" E O FOUND REBARS NOT ACCEPTED wAUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE cc FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 2016 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR CD UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS A7 M. IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE N 4 _____ 167J.93' WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (� AT THE REQUEST OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF IN JANUARY. 2016 5 NATURAL RESOURCES. O COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION 45158 RYNEA L. EDWARDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER FRANKON COUNTY DEPUTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER /LOT 6 o / / J 13.11 ACRES / /6 6 / 1046.97- N 89'1740" E N 34'40'19" E RADIAL\l 1, PETER GOLOMARK, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ACRNG FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY CERTIFY. THAT THE MAP ENTITLED 'AMENDMENT PASCO 15 SEGREGATION SURVEY, UPON WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS INSCRIBED, IS PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF WASHINGTON STATE LAWS, 2013 2ND SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 19, SECRON 3238 ---- FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PER CHAPTER 79.11 RCW. I� ITIS ALSO NOTED THAT A DULY AUDITOR OF TED COPY O 1TY, MAP SHALL .T FILED E O THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE `\\\ ORIGINAL COPY SHALL BE OLEO IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC � LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WA. s WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE __ DAY OF 2015. �I ry T.9N., R,29E. (DNR CR -2446) 3Q PETER RK COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS IT 89'18'23" E 1329.79' 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY IN SECTION 16 PASCO 16 FIELD CREW.. LINK, SEILER EDWARDS TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M. FIELD BOOK: SEI STATE OF WASHINGTON 110612016 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 4 F.M.p LAND SURVEY SECTION-P.O. BOX 47030 1848,2 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7030 (360)902-1206 �I Irrr 4 -r 1 In Exhibit A - O FOUND REBARS NOT ACCEPTED 5� FOUND ROADWAY MONUMENTS 1 4 1A / SEE SHEET 3 FOR CORNER NOTES n SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES 1 3 061'- 4 _____ 167J.93' Ag r - _ ------ -- 5 COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION \ I STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON N 34'40'19" E RADIAL\l 1, PETER GOLOMARK, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ACRNG FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY CERTIFY. THAT THE MAP ENTITLED 'AMENDMENT PASCO 15 SEGREGATION SURVEY, UPON WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS INSCRIBED, IS PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF WASHINGTON STATE LAWS, 2013 2ND SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 19, SECRON 3238 ---- FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PER CHAPTER 79.11 RCW. I� ITIS ALSO NOTED THAT A DULY AUDITOR OF TED COPY O 1TY, MAP SHALL .T FILED E O THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE `\\\ ORIGINAL COPY SHALL BE OLEO IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC � LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WA. s WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE __ DAY OF 2015. �I ry T.9N., R,29E. (DNR CR -2446) 3Q PETER RK COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS IT 89'18'23" E 1329.79' 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY IN SECTION 16 PASCO 16 FIELD CREW.. LINK, SEILER EDWARDS TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M. FIELD BOOK: SEI STATE OF WASHINGTON 110612016 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 4 F.M.p LAND SURVEY SECTION-P.O. BOX 47030 1848,2 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7030 (360)902-1206 �I Irrr 4 -r 1 In Exhibit A - Improvements to Chapel Hill Boulevard (Road 68 to Road 84) and Road 76 (Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard) Chapel Hill Boulevard Measurements Length(Roadway) 6600 Curbs LF 13860 Sidewalk (SY) 10780 Street Lights each 92 Striping LS 1 Landscaping LS 1 Median Curbs (LF) 7000 Pavement (SY) 48400 Embankment (CY) 48889 Excavation (CY) 48889 Water line (16") 6600 Irrigation 16" 6600 Sanitary Sewer 15" 6600 Storm Water LS 1 Traffic Signals Each 5 Mobilization 5% Desi (10%) Construction Management 10% Contingency 15% Road 76 Measurements Length 2900 Curbs LF 6090 Sidewalk (SY) 4737 Street Lights each 41 Striping LS 1 Landscaping (LS) 1 Median Curbs LF 4000 Pavement (SY) 21267 Embankment (CY) 21481 Excavation CY 21481 Water line 16") 3000 Irrigation (16") 3000 Sanitary Sewer (15") 3000 Storm Water LS 1 Traffic Signals Each 2 Mobilization (5% Desi 10% Construction Management 10% Contingency (15%) EXHIBIT B Page 235 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 11, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Bid Award: Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Safety Improvements Project I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Bid Tabulation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the WWTP Safety Improvements project, including all Alternates (Alternates 1 through 5), to Culbert Construction, Inc. in the amount of $115,022.41 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Utility Fund (Sewer) - $115,023 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Several needed improvements were identified during safety inspections for potential hazards in and around several Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) buildings and various lift stations that City personnel operate and maintain. This project corrects those identified deficiencies. Due to budgetary concerns the bid was broken into a base bid, which focused on safety improvement at the primary WWTP facility, and alternate locations, which, depending on bid price, could be awarded for completion as well. The alternate locations are as follows: Bid Alternate #1: Solids Thickening Building (WWTP) Bid Alternate #2: Aeration Basin Fall Protection Anchor Sleeves (WWTP) Page 236 of 252 Bid Alternate #3: 9th and Washington Lift Station (8 15 W. Washington Street) Bid Alternate #4: Northwest Commons Lift Station (5815 Nauvoo Lane) Bid Alternate #5: Commercial/Kahlotus Lift Station (801 N. Commercial Avenue) These concerns were shared with and confirmed by the City's Safety Specialist, as well as Public Works management. The final result is this safety project, which involves the installation of needed safety railing, stairs, ladders, and fall arrest equipment at the locations described in the attached bid tabulation sheet. These improvements will help to address and meet the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The project was originally budgeted in 2015 with advertisement for bid on November 22 and 29, 2015. The Bid Opening was held on December 8, 2015. V. DISCUSSION: On December 8, 2015, the City received five (5) bids for the project. The low bidder was Culbert Construction, Inc. in the amount of $115,022.41. The second lowest bidder was Banlin Construction in the amount of $126,562.49. The Engineer's Estimate is $104,228.85. Staff has reviewed the bid submittal and found no exceptions or irregularities. Staff recommends award of the contract to Culbert Construction, Inc. Page 237 of 252 Bid Tabulations - WWTP Safety Improvements Project #C7 -SE -1A-15-40 Bid Date: December S. 2015 Base Bid - WWTP Safety Improvements Description Quant Unit $ Engineer's Estimate Contractor: Culbert Construction Contractor: Banlin Construction Contractor: TML Construction Contractor: Industrial Constructors Contractor: Allstar Construction Group Item No. Description Quant Unit Unit Price Unit Price 1 Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 6,625.85 $ 6,625.85 $ 4,748.48 $ 4,748.48 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 13,114.00 $ 13,114.00 2 Erosion Control (SWPPP) 1 LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 198.93 $ 198.93 $ 393.04 $ 393.04 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,168.00 $ 1,168.00 3 Trimming and Clean Up 1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,243.83 $ 2,243.83 $ 890.41 $ 890.41 $ 950.00 $ 950.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 4,057.00 $ 4,057.00 4 Main Bdg - Aluminum Pipe Guardrail - 1 Horiz Rail 240 LF $ 55.00 $ 13,200.00 $ 58.33 $ 13,999.20 $ 84.23 $ 20,215.20 $ 105.00 $ 25,200.00 $ 90.00 $ 21,600.00 $ 140.98 $ 33,835.20 5 1 Main Bdg - Aluminum Pipe Guardrail - 2 Horiz Rail 120 LF $ 75.00 $ 9,000.00 $ 64.54 $ 7,744.80 $ 104.03 $ 12,483.60 $ 137.00 $ 16,440.00 $ 90.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 175.98 $ 21,117.60 6 Blower Bdg - Aluminum Pipe Guardrail - 2 Horiz. Rail 205 LF $ 75.00 $ 15,375.00 $ 62.97 $ 12,908.85 $ 103.72 $ 21,262.60 $ 137.00 $ 28,085.00 $ 100.00 $ 20,500.00 $ 167.58 $ 34,353.90 7 UV Bdg - Aluminum Pipe Guardrail - 2 Horiz. Rail 155 LF $ 75.00 $ 11,625.00 $ 62.78 $ 9,730.90 $ 104.55 $ 16,205.25 $ 137.00 $ 21,235.00 $ 100.00 $ 15,500.00 $ 168.69 $ 26,146.95 8 UV Bdg - Galy. Steel Stairs w/ Handrail 1 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 28,643.05 $ 28,643.05 $ 21,803.87 $ 21,803.87 $ 32,650.00 $ 32,650.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 32,513.00 $ 32,513.00 Subtotal Base Bid: 5 74,700.00 S 82,095.41 S 98,OOZ.45 5 130,560.00 5 154,100.00 S 166,305.65 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 6,424.20 $ 7,060.21 $ 8,428.21 $ 11,228.16 $ 13,252.60 $ 14,302.29 Total Base Bid: $ 81,124.20 $ 89,155.62 $ 106,430.66 $ 141,788.16 $ 167,352.60 $ 180,607.94 Alternate Ol - Snlids Thirkeninn Buildinn (WWTP1 Item No. Description Quant Unit $ Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount 1 Remove Aluminum Pipe Guardrail - 1 Horiz. Rail 10 LF $ 20.00 $ 200.00 $ 59.69 $ 596.90 $ 40.55 $ 405.50 $ 75.00 $ 750.00 $ 10.00 $ 100.00 $ 25.52 $ 255.20 2 Aluminum Pipe Guardrail - 1 Horiz. Rail 155 LF $ 55.00 $ 8,525.00 $ 58.93 $ 9,134.15 $ 76.05 $ 11,787.75 $ 88.00 $ 13,640.00 $ 100.00 $ 15,500.00 $ 81.71 $ 12,665.05 3 Hot Dip Galy. Cage for Vertical Ladder 1 EA $ 5,050.00 $ 5,050.00 $ 1,911.14 $ 1,911.14 $ 3,071.99 $ 3,071.99 $ 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 1,903.00 $ 1,903.00 Subtotal Alternate 1: S 13,775.00 11,64Z.19 15,Zb5.Z4 16,090.00 18,100.00 14,SZ3.Z5 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 1,184.65 $ 1,001.23 $ 1,312.81 $ 1,383.74 $ 1,556.60 $ 1,274.80 Total Alternate 1: $ 14,959.65 $ 12,643.42 $ 16,578.05 $ 17,473.74 $ 19,656.60 $ 16,098.05 Alternate #2 - Aeration Basin Fall Protection Anchor Sleeves (WWTP) Item $ 2,000.00 $ 3,714.12 $ 857.22 $ 1,280.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,908.00 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 172.00 $ 319.41 No. Description Quant Unit Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount $ 4" Daim. Core Hole & Install Fall Protection Core $ 2,072.09 2 Mount Sleeve 1 1 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,857.06 $ 1,857.06 $ 672.26 $ 672.26 $ 1,150.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,175.00 $ 1,175.00 1 Mount Sleeve 2 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,857.06 $ 3,714.12 $ 428.61 $ 857.22 $ 640.00 $ 1,280.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 954.00 $ 1,908.00 Subtotal Alternate 2: $ 2,000.00 $ 3,714.12 $ 857.22 $ 1,280.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,908.00 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 172.00 $ 319.41 $ 73.72 $ 110.08 $ 172.00 $ 164.09 Total Alternate 2: $ 2,172.00 $ 4,033.53 $ 930.94 $ 1,390.08 $ 2,172.00 $ 2,072.09 Alternate #3 - 9th & Washington Lift Station 815 W Washin ton St Subtotal Alternate 3: $ 1,500.00 $ 2,201.68 $ 672.26 $ 1,275.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,459.00 Item $ 189.34 $ 57.81 $ 109.65 $ 180.60 $ 125.47 Total Alternate 3: $ 1,629.00 No. Description Quant I Unit Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount 1 Mobilization 1 J LS $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 344.62 $ 344.62 $ - $ - $ 125.00 $ 125.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 284.00 $ 284.00 4" Daim. Core Hole & Install Fall Protection Core (D 2 Mount Sleeve 1 1 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,857.06 $ 1,857.06 $ 672.26 $ 672.26 $ 1,150.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,175.00 $ 1,175.00 Subtotal Alternate 3: $ 1,500.00 $ 2,201.68 $ 672.26 $ 1,275.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,459.00 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 129.00 $ 189.34 $ 57.81 $ 109.65 $ 180.60 $ 125.47 Total Alternate 3: $ 1,629.00 $ 2,391.02 $ 730.07 $ 1,384.65 $ 2,280.60 $ 1,584.47 N (D N W cfl O N CJt N Alternate #4 - NW Comons Lift Station (5815 Nauvoo Ln Item $ 2,201.68 $ 458.84 $ 1,425.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,853.00 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 129.00 No. I Description Quant Unit Unit Price I Total Amount I Unit Price Total Amount I Unit Price Total Amount I Unit Price Total Amount I Unit Price Total Amount I Unit Price Total Amount 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 500.00 1 $ 500.001 $ 344.62 1 $ 344.62 1 $1 $ 1 $ 125.001 $ 125.00 1 $ 100.001 $ 100.00 1 $ 284.001 $ 284.00 4" Daim. Core Hole & Install Fall Protection Core Unit Price Total Amount 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 344.62 $ 344.62 2 Mount Sleeve 1 EA $ 1,000.00 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,857.06 1 $ 1,857.06 1 $ 458.84 $ 458.84 1 $ 1,300.00 1 $ 1,300.00 1 $ 2,000.00 1 $ 2,000.00 1 $ 1,569.00 1 $ 1,569.00 Subtotal Alternate 4: $ 1,500.00 $ 2,201.68 $ 458.84 $ 1,425.00 $ 2,100.00 $ 1,853.00 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 129.00 $ 189.34 $ 39.46 $ 122.55 $ 180.60 $ 159.36 Total Alternate 4: $ 1,629.00 $ 2,391.02 $ 498.30 $ 1,547.55 $ 2,280.60 $ 2,012.36 Alternate #5 - Commercial/Kahlotus Lift Station (801 N Commercial Avel Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Item s Z,SUu.uu > 4,U!)8./4 > 1,2t34.u4 > Z,4ZS.uu > 3,1uu.uu > No. Description Quant Unit Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 344.62 $ 344.62 $ - $ $ 125.00 $ 125.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 284.00 $ 284.00 4" Daim. Core Hole & Install Fall Protection Core $ 2,808.40 Grand Total (Base + All Alternates) Incl. Sales Tax: $ 104,228.85 $ 115,022.41 $ 126,562.49 $ 166,217.73 2 Mount Sleeve 2 EA $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,857.06 $ 3,714.12 $ 642.02 $ 1,284.04 $ 1,150.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,151.00 $ 2,302.00 Suntotal Alternate S: s Z,SUu.uu > 4,U!)8./4 > 1,2t34.u4 > Z,4ZS.uu > 3,1uu.uu > Z,St3b.uu Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 215.00 $ 349.05 $ 110.43 $ 208.55 $ 266.60 $ 222.40 Total Alternate 5: $ 2,715.00 $ 4,407.79 $ 1,394.47 $ 2,633.55 $ 3,366.60 $ 2,808.40 Grand Total (Base + All Alternates) Incl. Sales Tax: $ 104,228.85 $ 115,022.41 $ 126,562.49 $ 166,217.73 $ 197,109.00 $ 205,183.30 N O CD N O O fV CJt N AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 19, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Bid Award: East Side Booster Pump Station Upgrade (BS 2.1) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Site Plan and Building Elevations Bid Tabulation II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the East Side Booster Pump Station Upgrade (BS 2.1) project to Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc. in the amount of $843,044.42 and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the contract documents. III. FISCAL IMPACT: 2015-2016 Bond - $843,045 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The East Side Booster Pump Station (BPS) is located adjacent to City Fire Department #81 at 310 North Oregon Avenue. This pump station is necessary to increase potable water pressure in the East Pasco area for domestic water service and fire flow. Major elements of the BPS are approaching or exceeding their useful life cycle which is being demonstrated through decreased reliability and increased maintenance. Additionally, commercial and residential growth within the BPS service area exceeds the original design parameters of the facility. The need for upgrades to the East Side BPS were first identified in the 2010 City of Pasco Comprehensive Water System Plan. RH2 Consulting Engineers from Richland, WA were contracted to perform the design. Page 241 of 252 The project involves expanding the existing East Side BPS facility, including replacement of the existing diesel engine fire pump with two new electric motor -driven pumps equipped with variable frequency drives (VFDs) that have been purchased by the City, installation of a suction pipe gallery, and other improvements to the facility. The project was advertised December 20 and 27, 2015, with the bid opening being held on January 8, 2016. V. DISCUSSION: On January 8, 2016, the City received eight (8) bids for the project. The low bid was from Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc. in the amount of $843,044.42. The second lowest bid was received from Culbert Construction, Inc. in the amount of $852,797.61. The Engineer's Estimate was $978,160.20. The project is included in our 2016-2021 Capital Improvements Plan and was budgeted for in 2016. Staff has reviewed the bid submittal and found no exceptions or irregularities and, therefore, recommends award of the contract to Big D's Construction of Tri -Cities, Inc. Page 242 of 252 T.9N. R30E. W.M. NTS Page 243 of 252 t �Y C*d&CTM* 0 El� SM t •%. NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATIONI East Side Booster Pump Station Upgrade Project Site Plan and Building Elevations Page 244 of 252 x 43=" EM191R7if y IA TiMTiG�11NE11�1AN1T *� r aIlmF]mmw A + _4 cum" j NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATIONI East Side Booster Pump Station Upgrade Project Site Plan and Building Elevations Page 244 of 252 Bid Tabulations - East Side Booster Station Upgrade (BS 2.1) Project #0 -WT -211-13-02 Bid Date: January 8, 2016 Subtotal: $ 900,700.00 $ 776,284.00 $ 785,264.83 $ 868,645.00 $ 876,857.00 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 77,460.20 $ 66,760.42 $ 67,532.78 $ 74,703.47 $ 75,409.70 TOTAL: $ 978,160.20 $ 843,044.42 $ 852,797.61 $ 943,348.47 $ 952,266.70 Contractor: Apollo, Inc. Engineer's Estimate Contractor: Big D's Construction Contractor: Culbert Construction Contractor: Total Site Services Contractor: Allstar Construction Group Item No. Description Quant Unit Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 67,000.00 $ 67,000.00 $ 25,916.00 $ 25,916.00 $ 82,563.76 $ 82,563.76 $ 67,892.00 $ 67,892.00 $ 31,585.00 $ 31,585.00 2 Final As -Built Records 1 LS $ 4,400.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 1,760.00 $ 1,760.00 $ 764.84 $ 764.84 $ 25,459.00 $ 25,459.00 $ 6,317.00 $ 6,317.00 3 Testing, Startup, Training and O&M Manuals 1 LS $ 6,300.00 $ 6,300.00 $ 2,860.00 $ 2,860.00 $ 2,242.72 $ 2,242.72 $ 25,459.00 $ 25,459.00 $ 12,634.00 $ 12,634.00 4 Force Account Work 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 5 TECS 1 LS $ 3,800.00 $ 3,800.00 $ 2,376.00 $ 2,376.00 $ 1,792.95 $ 1,792.95 $ 42,432.00 $ 42,432.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 3,250.00 6 Demolition and Removal 1 LS $ 15,700.00 $ 15,700.00 $ 10,168.00 $ 10,168.00 $ 10,262.84 $ 10,262.84 $ 42,432.00 $ 42,432.00 $ 19,609.00 $ 19,609.00 7 Site Work 1 LS $ 60,400.00 $ 60,400.00 $ 43,700.00 $ 43,700.00 $ 27,838.04 $ 27,838.04 $ 33,946.00 $ 33,946.00 $ 113,228.00 $ 113,228.00 8 Site Utilities 1 LS $ 58,400.00 $ 58,400.00 $ 100,578.00 $ 100,578.00 $ 81,501.31 $ 81,501.31 $ 76,378.00 $ 76,378.00 $ 37,515.00 $ 37,515.00 9 Structural 1 LS $ 178,400.00 $ 178,400.00 $ 189,800.00 $ 189,800.00 $ 204,444.41 $ 204,444.41 $ 212,162.00 $ 212,162.00 $ 241,332.00 $ 241,332.00 10 Pumps and Motors 1 LS $ 58,500.00 $ 58,500.00 $ 4,792.00 $ 4,792.00 $ 5,842.82 $ 5,842.82 $ 16,973.00 $ 16,973.00 $ 5,863.00 $ 5,863.00 11 Pump Station Mechanical 1 LS $ 61,300.00 $ 61,300.00 $ 104,231.00 $ 104,231.00 $ 115,865.16 $ 115,865.16 $ 59,405.00 $ 59,405.00 $ 79,595.00 $ 79,595.00 12 Vault and Vault Mechanical 1 LS $ 33,800.00 $ 33,800.00 $ 46,026.00 $ 46,026.00 $ 37,521.35 $ 37,521.35 $ 59,405.00 $ 59,405.00 $ 60,737.00 $ 60,737.00 13 Electrical 1 LS $ 294,100.00 $ 294,100.00 $ 168,900.00 $ 168,900.00 $ 153,629.45 $ 153,629.45 $ 127,297.00 $ 127,297.00 $ 187,764.00 $ 187,764.00 14 Automatic Control 1 LS $ 38,600.00 $ 38,600.00 $ 55,177.00 $ 55,177.00 $ 40,995.18 $ 40,995.18 $ 59,405.00 $ 59,405.00 $ 57,428.00 $ 57,428.00 Subtotal: $ 900,700.00 $ 776,284.00 $ 785,264.83 $ 868,645.00 $ 876,857.00 Sales Tax @ 8.6%: $ 77,460.20 $ 66,760.42 $ 67,532.78 $ 74,703.47 $ 75,409.70 TOTAL: $ 978,160.20 $ 843,044.42 $ 852,797.61 $ 943,348.47 $ 952,266.70 (`D $ 881,900.00 $ 888,893.00 N) $ 75,843.40 $ 76,444.80 Cn $ 957,743.40 $ 965,337.80 O N C31 N $ 945,000.00 $ 987,400.00 $ 81,270.00 $ 84,916.40 $1,026,270.00 $1,072,316.40 Contractor: Apollo, Inc. Contractor: Wesslen Construction Contractor: Award Construction Contractor: Industrial Constructors Item No. Description Quant Unit Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount Unit Price Total Amount 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 35,000.00 $ 35,000.00 $ 69,577.00 $ 69,577.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 2 Final As -Built Records 1 LS $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 575.00 $ 575.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 3 Testing, Startup, Training and O&M Manuals 1 LS $ 4,400.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 2,645.00 $ 2,645.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 4 Force Account Work 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 5 TECS 1 LS $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,725.00 $ 1,725.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 6 Demolition and Removal 1 LS $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 10,810.00 $ 10,810.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 7 Site Work 1 LS $ 31,000.00 $ 31,000.00 $ 43,284.00 $ 43,284.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 8 Site Utilities 1 LS $ 120,000.00 $ 120,000.00 $ 102,396.00 $ 102,396.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ 160,000.00 $ 160,000.00 9 Structural 1 LS $ 244,000.00 $ 244,000.00 $ 184,634.00 $ 184,634.00 $ 215,000.00 $ 215,000.00 $ 207,400.00 $ 207,400.00 10 Pumps and Motors 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 17,825.00 $ 17,825.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 11 Pump Station Mechanical 1 LS $ 105,000.00 $ 105,000.00 $ 118,398.00 $ 118,398.00 $ 94,000.00 $ 94,000.00 $ 150,000.00 $ 150,000.00 12 Vault and Vault Mechanical 1 LS $ 54,000.00 $ 54,000.00 $ 49,347.00 $ 49,347.00 $ 93,000.00 $ 93,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 13-nElectrical 1 LS $ 195,000.00 $ 195,000.00 $ 205,373.00 $ 205,373.00 $ 202,000.00 $ 202,000.00 $ 175,000.00 $ 175,000.00 140) Automatic Control 1 LS $ 59,000.00 $ 59,000.00 $ 62,304.00 $ 62,304.00 $ 61,000.00 $ 61,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 55,000.00 (`D $ 881,900.00 $ 888,893.00 N) $ 75,843.40 $ 76,444.80 Cn $ 957,743.40 $ 965,337.80 O N C31 N $ 945,000.00 $ 987,400.00 $ 81,270.00 $ 84,916.40 $1,026,270.00 $1,072,316.40 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 25, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) Plan I. REFERENCE(S): Storm Water Drainage System Map Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Summary Sheet II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) Plan with Herrerra Environmental Consultants, Inc. and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Utility Fund (Stormwater) - $147,647 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Pasco is a Phase II Eastern Washington Municipal Stormwater Permittee with the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). Pasco's current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit runs from August 1, 2014 through July 31, 2019. Per the requirements set forth in Section S5. Stormwater Management Program for Cities, Towns and Counties of the Permit, Pasco is required to have both a Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) and a Stormwater Management Program Plan (Plan) that details all aspects of the City's SWMP. Pasco's current four page Plan has not kept pace with DOE changes to stormwater rules and regulations and needs major updating. Key components to be documented in the Plan include: Public Education and Outreach; Public Involvement and Participation; Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination; Construction Site Page 246 of 252 Stormwater Runoff Control; Post -Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment; and Municipal Operations and Maintenance. Additionally, the Plan will evaluate the effect of the City's current stormwater utility structure, land use regulations and policies, and existing infrastructure maintenance with regard to risk management, environmental stewardship, and regulatory compliance. The Plan will set near and long term (5-10 year) planning goals and prioritize a list of needed capital improvement projects to correct existing deficiencies within the system and to construct future stormwater mitigation infrastructure. Finally, the Plan will provide the City with a tool to perform a rate study and evaluate our current stormwater charges for future stormwater related capital improvements and existing infrastructure maintenance and improvement. Pasco has five drainage basins tributary to the Columbia River within the City limits. Two of the basins discharge along the shore of the river, while the remaining three basins discharge to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ditch located behind the Columbia River dike. The five basins total just under 4,000 acres in size and are all situated south of I-182, east of US -395, and west of SR -12 and generally encompass the downtown core area of Pasco. The remaining stormwater runoff within the City generally infiltrates to the underlying native soils in accordance with City regulations first enacted in 1983. `Chapter 16.05 - Impervious Surfaces' from the City's Municipal Code regulates the surface drainage of private properties within the City and states "An impervious surface improvement shall be designed to drain, confine and/or impound storm water or site -generated water within the private property upon which the improvement is to be located." City owned right-of-way improvements are also required to provide on-site mitigation measures. Fortunately for the citizens of Pasco, the low annual precipitation and high permeability of underlying soils makes infiltration a successful mitigation practice. One component of the Plan will define the direction for the City's effort to retrofit existing stormwater infrastructure currently discharging directly to the Columbia River, with the ultimate goal of eliminating all surface water discharges. The Plan will ensure the retrofit program occurs in a manner that is consistent with the priorities of the City, its citizens and the DOE. On December 7, 2015, the Pasco City Council adopted the Capital Projects Budget for the year 2016. One component of the adopted Budget provides for the creation of a Storm Water Master Plan. It is the City's intent to have a consultant with strong knowledge of applicable federal, state, and local regulations and standards governing the Phase II Eastern Washington Municipal Stormwater Permit, the Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington, and the Eastern Washington Low Impact Development Guidance Manual, initiate and complete all aspects of the MS4 Plan. Page 247 of 252 V. DISCUSSION: In November of 2015, Staff issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to provide services for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) Plan. On December 22, 2015, the City received responses from two consultants. During December 2015/January 2016, Staff reviewed the two submittals and independently rated the consultants using the same Consultant Criteria Ranking Form for each. The rating panel included representatives from Engineering and Operations. On January 6, 2016, in-person interviews were conducted with the two consultants. Staff independently rated the consultants using an established Interview Ranking Form and the rating panel felt confident, based upon these interviews, of the final selection. Herrerra Environmental Consultants, Inc., was selected by the rating panel to be most qualified consultant to complete the MS4 Plan. Scope and Fee contract negotiations were conducted during January 2016. Herrerra's Scope of Services includes the following elements: Task 1.0 - Project Management and Communications, Task 2.0 - Review Existing Data and Documentation, Task 3.0 - Program Evaluation and Needs Assessment, Task 4.0 - Capital Improvement Program for Storm Water Facilities, and Task 5.0 - Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. This item was discussed at the January 25, 2016 Council meeting. Page 248 of 252 Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: Professional Services Agreement for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Plan Consultant: Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. Address: 1220 41h Avenue East, Olympia, WA 98506 Scope of Services: To complete all aspects of the Storm Water Master Plan. Term: Completion Date: July 31, 2016 Payments to Consultant: ❑ Hourly Rate: ❑ Fixed Sum of - 0 Other: not to exceed $147.647 Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: ❑ $1,000,000 each occurrence; ❑ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or ❑X $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: © $1,000,000 per claim; ❑ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or ❑ $ per claim; and $ per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Signature by: ❑ Mayor ❑X City Manager Page 250 of 252 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 26, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 2/1/16 FROM: Rick Terway, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement - Park, Recreation and Forestry Plan Update I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed PSA Summary IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with Studio Cascade Inc. for the Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Forestry Plan update and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. III. FISCAL IMPACT: $25,000 - Park Impact Fund IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: To remain eligible for grant funds from the State of Washington Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) the City is required to update the Park, Recreation and Forestry Comprehensive Plan every 5 years. The last update was in 2010. The City has been successful in receiving RCO grants for Sylvester Park, the Softball Complex and Highland Park projects. A "Request for Qualifications" was published, with one response from Studio Cascade Inc. V. DISCUSSION: Studio Cascade updated the City's Park, Recreation and Forestry Plan in 2005 and 2010. They are knowledgeable about what is required to remain eligible for grant funding and will provide continuity in the process and save dollars by not having to rehash old issues. Staff recommends approval of the agreement. Page 251 of 252 Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: 2016 Park, Recreation & Forestry Plan Update Consultant: Studio Cascade Inc Address: 117 W. Pacific Ave. Ste.200 Spokane WA 99201 Scope of Services: Update Park, Recreation & Forestry Master Plan Term: 180 days Completion Date: July 31, 2016 Payments to Consultant: 1-1 Hourly Rate: $ Q Fixed Sum of. $ 25,000.00 Other: Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: 0 $1,000,000 each occurrence; $2,000,000 general aggregate; or El $ each occurrence; and $ general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: 0 $1,000,000 per claim; $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or $ per claim; and $ per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Signature by: Mayor Q City Manager Page 252 of 252