Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016.01.25 Council Workshop PacketAGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. January 25, 2016 Page 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) Community Action Connections "Community Needs Assessment and Inventory of Community Assets" Presentation Presented by Cathy Merrill Holle, Resource Development Manager and Eileen Grigsby, Data Analyst, Community Action Connections 3 - 4 (b) Broadmoor Area Master Plan 5 - 13 (c) Chapel Hill Boulevard Extension - Resolution for LID 14 (d) Fire Safety Inspection Program 15 - 16 (e) Vehicular Parking and Storage 17-21 (f) Professional Services Agreement for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) Plan 22-31 (g) Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance Interlocal Agreement 32-45 (h) Report on Sale of 2015 Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Page 1 of 45 Workshop Meeting 7. ADJOURNMENT. January 25, 2016 REMINDERS: 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, January 26, TRAC — TRAC Advisory Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS and COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY) 7:30 a.m., Wednesday, January 27, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd — Visit Tri -Cities Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 2 of 45 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 18, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/25/16 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Broadmoor Area Master Plan I. REFERENCE(S): H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: DISCUSSION III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The Broadmoor property contains about 1050 total acres located on a southward facing bench with views of the Columbia River and Columbia River Valley. The site is located in the geographic center of the Tri -Cities and provide access to most Tri -City locations in a 10 minute travel time. It provides the best potential location in Pasco for regional commercial development. Broadmoor Boulevard (RD 100) now extends north of the freeway to Dent Road. Utility lines have been installed in surrounding streets and commercial and residential development has occurred on the east side of Broadmoor Boulevard. Sandifur Parkway and the Sandifur Parkway traffic signal were designed and constructed to facilitate the extension of Sandifur Parkway to the west through the center of the site. Residential development is occurring to the north and west of the property. The Public Works Department has coordinated with the property owner for the granting of a sewer easement for a major trunk sewer line for future service to this portion of the Urban Growth Area. During that coordination, staff discussed with the owner the necessity of increased marketing and development efforts for this regionally important property. This discussion included ways to best accomplish promotion, detailed design and development of the commercial portions of the Adams property so the development potential of the area is achieved. Page 3 of 45 In February of 2015 the City and the property owner approved a letter of agreement that will transfer 5 acres of property within this area to the City for municipal uses (fire stations, community centers, parks ...) as "payment" for the City's lead in undertaking the planning and marketing efforts discussed above. Staff has worked in close coordination with design and marketing professionals on this approach and has met with a measure of success in establishing this area as a promising location for commercial and residential development. The City's adopted 2016 Budget contains funding for the next level of planning, marketing and permit preparation for this area that is necessary to: establish land use designation and locations in close coordination with Council Goals and economic factors; establish "on the ground" locations for infrastructure (roads, utilities and public land uses); provide certainty to the development community on product expectations and return on investment; and provide a systematic and comprehensive approach to developing a large and valuable community asset. V. DISCUSSION: The Broadmoor area is important from a local and regional standpoint. It provides the best potential location in Pasco for regional commercial development. The site possesses superior views to the south, east and west. It has ease of access and is recognized for its development potential. As Pasco continues its west and northwestward growth pattern, the City will need to establish community services in the Broadmoor area. These services will require appropriate locations for a range services such as fire stations, community centers and parks and the potential for regionally recognized recreational attractions such as a sports or aquatics complex. The City's professional consultant will provide a presentation to Council on the process and focus areas for the next year. Page 4 of 45 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 21, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/25/16 FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Director Public Works SUBJECT: Chapel Hill Boulevard Extension - Resolution for LID I. REFERENCE(S): Area Map - DNR Property Chapel Hill Boulevard Road Cross Section Proposed Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Staff and and representatives from Department of Natural Resources (DNR) have been working for a number of years to create opportunities for development of DNR property that is situated west of Road 68, south of I-182, east of Road 84 and north of Argent Road. The property is approximately 350 acres and has been farmed for a number of years. The property is surrounded by development and is located within a prime location for commercial and residential development. Initially, the City had approached DNR to trade their property for farm land that the City owns at the Process Water Reuse Facility (PWRF). When negotiations were not successful during the 2013 session, the City was able to secure legislation which required that DNR auction the residential portion of the property for development. DNR will retain ownership of the 50+ acre portion of the property which is commercially zoned. In 2014, staff worked with DNR regarding zoning and proposed partitioning of the Page 5 of 45 property into large lots in order to set it up for auction. Staff completed a 5% design roadway alignment for necessary right-of-way exhibits for Chapel Hill and Road 76. In summer 2015, approximately 260 acres of the residential portion of the property were advertised for auction. Unfortunately, DNR did not receive any bids for the project. DNR hired a professional auctioneer late in 2015 that met with staff to prepare additional information for the project and to facilitate potential developers bidding the property. One of the most important questions for a potential developer would be if there is public infrastructure needed to make the project more viable. There are number of major public improvements needed, including the continuation of Chapel Hill Boulevard from Road 68 to Road 84 and a continuation of Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard. One primary question is how to fund the cost for roadways and utilities. In the past four years, staff has applied for various grants as part of the City's participation to help with roadway construction. The grants included Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) and Surface Transportation Program (STP). Unfortunately, the City has not been successful in obtaining those types of grants. However, staff will continue to seek any available grants. Mr. Zabell is exploring the option of tax increment financing, also known as LIFT in Washington, with state Legislators. Typically a developer completes public improvements as part of a subdivision. However, with such a large site and, a number of potential developers, it is vital that the roadway improvements are completed during the initial phase of the development. The need for the infrastructure was confirmed with DNR and their auctioneer consultant during our numerous meetings. The property is more attractive for bidding if there is a way to ensure plans for public improvements have been addressed. During discussions with DNR staff, the idea of setting up a Local Improvement District (LID) in order to fund the roadway and utility improvements was proposed. DNR is receptive to the idea of an LID. City Staff has completed a number of LID projects throughout the city and, typically, it is a lengthy process completed through approval of a petition. However, since there is only one property owner with a few parcels, the process can be expedited through the adoption of a resolution. Staff has developed a very preliminary cost estimate with the 5% road alignment design for the project. This phase of the LID will include roadway improvements and utilities for Chapel Hill from Road 68 to Road 84 with sidewalks, streetlights, landscaping, traffic signals, if they are warranted, and landscaped medians. The improvements will also be similar for Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill. The typical roadway section for Chapel Hill Boulevard will be designated as a principal arterial facility with a five lane roadway, bike lanes, and sidewalk within a 100 to 105 foot right-of-way. Road 76 will be designated as minor arterial with a three lane roadway including sidewalks, street lights and landscaping within 80 feet of right- of-way. Page 6 of 45 The preliminary estimated cost for the outlined public infrastructure is approximately $13.5 million, which includes design, project management, 15% contingencies, major utilities such as water, sewer, irrigation, stormwater, and associated roadway improvements. The total improvements will be made to approximately 6,600 feet for Chapel Hill Boulevard and approximately 2,900 feet for Road 76. V. DISCUSSION: Staff recommends approval of the resolution enabling improvements of infrastructure needed to make the development of the DNR property viable and to set up assessments for all the properties in preparation for the upcoming auction in April 2016. The resolution requires DNR to complete the improvements through the LID process. The City will continue to apply for and seek any other funding sources which may become available. Page 7 of 45 w m w 0 15.60' 0 \ 50' N 89° 15' 45" E 2625.87' S 66 S6>7S F ?8S4 ?8 R50' i rn I I I o 00 N I w I 00 O I i� o � z CO 0 I I 64 50 �\ &I 38 F l� 78 O 78, -I N 89° 17' 14" E 1319. 140' R/W FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITIES I LOT 3 00 21.47 Acres I 1322.08' S pFR MARC/N R�IMgp �q �F cq� CU / p\ �gTFO 100' R/W FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILI 7 II LOT 2 �I 102.72 Acres N 89° 17' 14" E 2644.16' 00 0 ICIA 0 rn I� 0 O 9 ju S ss Lis CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA ANGLE RADIUS ARC LENGTH Cl 5°40'00" 537.28' 53.14' C2 9°20'00" 442.59' 72.10' C3 26°40'00" 143.32' 66.70' C4 10°50'00" 313.65' 59.30' C5 20°40'00" 83.30' 30.05' C6 25° 10'00" 83.32' 36.60' C7 20°50'00" 171.79' 62.46' C8 35°30'00" 143.39' 88.84' C9 28°20'00" 64.45' 31.87' C10 27°30'00" 64.42' 30.92' C 1 1 1 *25'15" 110.97' 2.97' C12 64°47' 1 1 " 500.00' 565.37' C13 85°39'07" 550.00' 822.20' C14 55°48'07" 550.00' 535.66' C15 53°26'29" 500.00' 466.36' C16 38°57'45" 900.00' 612.02' C17 21°29'49" 520.00' 195.10' C18 41°40'42" 540.00' 392.81' C19 26'13'19 " 340.00' 155.60' C20 39°53'32" 490.00' 1 341.16' C21 02°54' 18" 2865.00' 1 145.26' �\ \� LOT 1 �4 76 II 37.86 Acres 1 -P o I �� ('d O � o I hry LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 76°37'50" E 36.41' L2 S 70°57'50" E 1064.42' L3 S 61°37'50" E 192.19' L4 S 61`37'50" E 94.85' L5 S 88°17'50" E 96.38' L6 N 80°52'10" E 107.96' L7 S 78°27'50" E 40.37' L8 S 53°17'50" E 87.37' L9 S 74°07'50" E 38.20' L10 N 70°22'10" E 127.55' L11 S 81°17'50" E 316.05' L12 S 53°47'50" E 83.51' L13 S 52°54'05" E 206.16' L14 S 66°56'15" E 100.00' L15 S 66°56'15" E 270.00' L16 S 68°38'07" E 143.05' L17 S 44`16'40" E 133.64' L18 N 86°23'21 " E 173.44' L19 N 78`20'30" E 100.00' L20 S 87°29'37" E 87.36' L21 S 87°29'37" E 7.61' L22 N 24°31'45" W 85.64' AMENDMENT PASCO 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY THIS SEGREGATION SURVEY IS TO AMEND AND REPLACE "PASCO 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED UNDER AFN. 1828912 RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE NEW LOT CONFIGURATION CREATES 7 LOTS INSTEAD OF 11 LOTS. 1" = 400 FEET 0 200 400 800 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM SOUTH ZONE, NAD83/91 BASIS OF BEARING: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES: WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD 83/91 SOUTH ZONE DATA TRIMBLE R8/2 GPS RECEIVER. INITIAL CONTROL POINTS FROM FRANKLIN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT WERE ESTABLISHED FROM TIES TO THE WSRN NETWORK CONTROL POINT NO. 1511 N: 341159.34 E: 1974390.99 AND THEN CONSTRAINED TO FRANKLIN REGIONAL CONTROL CONTROL POINT N0. 1507 N: 339246.30 E: 1969027.01 POINT NO'S: 1511 AND 1507. CORNERS WERE DUALLY TIED TO to tP ESTABLISH 2 MEASUREMENTS. THE RELATIVE ACCURACY I i r\ 0. DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCE STANDARDS WERE MET AS SPECIFIED IN WAC 332-130-080. Oa 0 6550 o� 655p�� Z COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.99991342 �' LEGEND: v' I I LOT 7 0�� �� 0-0-00FOUND MONUMENT. C S 00°32'53" W o N 265.06' 59.50 Acres \ R50' I I R50' + C>0<1 CALCULATED CORNER � L21 C18 L18 09 ( O FOUND REBARS NOT ACCEPTED C __ - S 89° 17' 14" W 2642.59' 1 74 L20 1 (� \ \ 5' 75` FOUND ROADWAY MONUMENTS R50 \ 4 II 40 I- 40 \ SEE SHEET 3 FOR CORNER NOTES \� v'� / wll I oQ o gyp; 0 1�� \0 0)0 00100' R50' �' N / SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES to R/W rl O I I N 00 \ FOR INGRESS, po � O I (6 �_ w w p �S� 50 EGRESS AND UTILITIES Co _ Ol o z Q `� \ _� - _ _ CHAPEL HILL BLVD /� y o,� "2 4 5 OI I o O \ S 85°07'59" / 3 = z l l N o 356.76'_ E 1285.87 7 --- 426.81'-- ---------1677.93'--------- w 50 w - - - -929.1 1 '_ _ - - II moo / -- ---------------------- 00 O of / - o w 1 L \ w Co / / N r _ z `. 5 In O I LOT 4 r / / / / co I Lo COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION ro/LOT 6 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON o ?98 44 \ X80' R/W FOR INGRESS,, 1 IF 38.09 Acres / \ z M 1 C1 \ EGRESS AND UTILITIES'l z / / 13.11 ACRES \ I COUNTY OF THURSTON 16 2� N 1046.97' \ " N 1 RP��F I, PETER GOLDMARK, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ACTING FOR THE DEPARTMENT Lu N 89.17'40" E OF NAT .• RAL RESOURCES, IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY TIF 01 7 / THAT THE MAP ENTITLED 'AMENDMENT PASCO 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY, UPON WHICH Ln N \ \ THIS CERTIFICATE IS INSCRIBED, IS PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF - _ N 34°40'19" E RADIAL o I 2 L5- \ -t oo\ \ WASHINGTON STATE LAWS, 2013 2ND SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 19, SECTION 3238 z o I I I C3 C4 C5C6 L12\ - 110.97' 0 FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PER CHAPTER 79.11 RCW. 00 L4 C C9 _ - _ - - I oq IT IS ALSO NOTED THAT A DULY AUTHENTICATED COPY OF THIS MAP SHALL BE FILED � I I I I L9 C8 C70 = _ - -�\ _ _ i 00 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE i I I o // / \ \\ i - ORIGINAL COPY SHALL BE FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC ct / / C11 w LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WA. Q � I w Q I I SEE SHEET 2 I o w // I N O I FOR DETAIL o w z I LOT 5 / / I M WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE -------- DAY OF --------------_ I I ro o ,, 0 30.05 Acres // 0 01 N 2015. I OI / / o z o � I ro 0 / / 0000 Z li I o II oma' /00 A(DNR CR -2446) 30' I I I z u / 30' IT9N., R,29E. f-- 30'(DNR CR -2446)) 30' (DNR CR -2446) 3� PETER COMMISGOLDMSIONER RK 88 R/W PIPE LINE EASEMENT 50' I I -� R50'77 COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ---------------- - ----\ =J =1315.49' TO C/L PROPOSED NEW ROAD= _ _ No1S 89° 17'39" W 1330.33' } S 89° 17'44" W 1330.40' } N 89-18'04" E 1330.13 N 89° 18'23" E 1329.79' 16 ARGENT ROAD L 30' (DNR CR -3095) `-- / AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF AT M. IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 2016 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN JANUARY, 2016 45158 FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPUTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER ' RYNEA L. EDWARDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER WAS4 ti a.d b' o 45158 Q�GISTEgE..�'4` TONAL LA1D SEGREGATION SURVEY IN SECTION 16 TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W. M. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAND SURVEY SECTION-P.O. BOX 47030 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7030 (360)902-1206 PASCO 16 FIELD CREW. - FIELD BOOK: 1 /06/2016 F.M.# 1848.2 SHEET 1 OF 3 ns' 5 12" 12- 5" n.5' 7 / J IL IL IL IL 5' D / CHAPEL HILL BLVD 2—WAY LEFT TURN SECTION Alnr Tn crAl r D 5IL IL IL �J ROAD 76 2—WAY LEFT TURN SECTION NOT TO SCALE IL IL IL IL 5. O CHdPFI 14111 Rnlll FVdRD SFCTION I< Iz ROAD 76 BOULEVARD SECTION s NOT TO SCALE O_ Z LL, w Z M w� L0 ® Y � O 3: N J� m CL DRAWN BY: GTR DESIGN BY: NA GTR CHECKED BY:NA HOR SCALE: 1"=40' VER SCALE: 1 "=4' SHEET 13 13 CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE IMPROVEMENTS; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE IMPROVEMENTS OF CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD (FROM ROAD 68 TO ROAD 84, INCLUDING THE INTERSECTION WITH ROAD 76, AND ROAD 76 FROM ARGENT ROAD TO CHAPEL HILL BOULEVARD) TO CREATE A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO ASSESS THE COST AND EXPENSE OF CARRYING OUT THOSE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SPECIALLY BENEFITTED THEREBY; AND, NOTIFYING ALL PERSONS WHO DESIRE TO OBJECT TO THE IMPROVEMENTS TO APPEAR AND PRESENT THEIR OBJECTIONS AT A HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO BE HELD ON MARCH 7, 2016. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, as follows: Section I. It is the intention of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, to order the improvement of the property within the area described in Exhibit A, by the improvement of Chapel Hill Boulevard (from Road 68 to Road 84, including the intersection with Road 76, and Road 76 from Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard). The improvements are more fully described in Exhibit B, and consist of frill roadway improvements that includes road construction to three lane and five lane design, curb, gutter, sidewalk, storm drain system, street lighting, bike lanes and landscaping (collectively, the "Improvements"). The referenced Exhibits A and B are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof: All of the foregoing Improvements shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications therefore prepared by the City Engineer of the City and may be modified by the City as long as that modification does not affect the purpose of the improvements. Section 2. The total estimated cost and expense of the Improvements is declared to be $13,427,125, of which an estimated $13,427,125 million shall be borne by and assessed against the property specially benefited by the Improvements to be included in a local improvement district to be established and embracing as nearly as practicable all the property specially benefited by the Improvements. Actual assessments may vary from estimated assessments as long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value the Improvements add to the property. Section 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to give notice of the adoption of this resolution and of the date, time and place fixed herein for the public hearing to each owner or reputed owner of any lot, tract, parcel of land or other property within the proposed local improvement district by mailing such notice at least fifteen days before the date fixed for public hearing to the owner or reputed owner of the property as shown on the rolls of the Franklin County Assessor at the address shown thereon, as required by law. Page 10 of 45 This resolution also shall be published in its entirety in at least two consecutive issues of the official newspaper of the City, the date of the first publication to be at least 15 days prior to the date fixed herein for the public hearing. Section 4. All persons who may desire to object to the Improvements are notified to appear and present those objections at a hearing before the City Council to be held in the Council Chambers in the City Hall, 525 N. 3rd Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at 7:00 p.m. on March 7, 2016, which time and place are fixed for hearing all matters relating to the Improvements and all objections thereto and for determining the method of payment for the Improvements. All persons who object thereto should appear and present their objections at that hearing. Any person who may desire to file a written protest with the City Council may do so within 30 days after the date of passage of the ordinance ordering the Improvements in the event the local improvement district is formed. The written protest should be signed by the property owner and should include the legal description of the property for which the protest is filed and that protest should be delivered to the City Clerk. The City Engineer is directed to submit to the City Council on or prior to March 7, 2016, all data and information required by law to be submitted. The foregoing resolution was ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof this l st day of February, 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: <04N Debra L. Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 11 of 45 a I n � $ � I O o � I N 89'15'45" E 2625.87- 6 i B 478 CR50' �/'s 6�HgpF zj3s. 50' V �R/W FOR INC EGRESS AND /r �I n LOT 2 , 3 N 89'1714" E 1319.62' 102.72 Acres I ' 1� 40- R O m < /W FOR INGRESS, I I Q I EGRESS AND UTILITIES 1 1 O I - �' I � LOT 7 LOT 3 S 00'32'53" W \ w\ I 265.06' 59.50 Acres 21.47 Acres \ \ \ R=0' \ j R50' \ L21 LOT 1 ' 37.86 Acres LZD I (\ 2\ 40 � CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE AMENDMENT LINE BEARING DISTANCE PASCO 16 Ll S 76'37'50"E 36.41' L2 S 71.57.50• E 1164.42' SEGREGATION SURVEY L3 S 61'37'50" E 192.19' L4 5 61'37'50" E 94.85' LS S 88'17'50 E 96.38' 16 N 8952'10" E 107.96' L7 S 78'27'50" E 40.37' La S 53'17'50" E 87.37' THIS SEGREGATION SURVEY IS TO L9 S 74'0750" E 38.20' AMEND AND REPLACE "PASCO 16 u1 N 7927'50" E 127.55' L11 S 81'17'50" E 316. 05' SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED UNDER L12 S 53'47'51" E 03.51' AFH. 1628912 RECORDS OF L13 S 52'54405" E 206.16' FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. L14 S 66056'15" E 501.OV THE NEW LOT CONFIGURATION L15 S 66'56'15" E 270.00' CREATES 7 LOTS INSTEAD OF 11 L16 S 68'38'07" E 143.05' LOTS. L17 S 44'16'40 E 133.64' LIB N 862321" E 173.44' 119 N 78'20'30" E 100.00' L20 S BT29'37" E 87.36' 1" = 400 FEET L21 S 87'29'37" E 7.61' L22 N 24'31'45' WT 85.64' 0 200 400. 800 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM SOUTH ZONE. NA063191 BASIS OF BEARING: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES: WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 83/91 SOUTH ZONE DATA THIMBLE R8/2 GPS RECEIVER. INITIAL CONTROL POINTS FROM FRANKLIN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT WERE ESTABLISHED FROM RES TO THE WSRN NETWORK CONTROL POINT N0. 1511 N. 341159.34 E. 1974390.99 AND THEN CONSTRAINED TO FRANKLIN REGIONAL CONTROL CONTROL POINT NO. 1507 N:339246.30 E. 1969027.01 POINT NO'S: 1511 AND 1501 CORNERS WERE DUALLY TIED TO ESTABLISH 2 MEASUREMENTS. THE RELATIVE ACCURACY DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCE STANDARDS WERE MET AS SPECIFIED IN WAC 331-130-080. COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.99991342 LEGEND: N� � FOUND MONUMENT. f + �4 CALCULATED CORNER S 09'17'14" W 2642.59' 1l5 7 11 o, R50' R 1 \ /W FOR INGRESS, \ 50 I ^I EORESS AND UDUIIES - CHAPEL E HILL BLVD --S 85'0759" 356.76'- 1285.87' 7 50 J__ ----929.11- LOT 4 38.09 Acres K C11 LOT 5 / / I 30.05 Acres I AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE I 5� FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 2016 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR 1 4 1A / UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AT M. IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE (p 'NI WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES R/1\FOR\N\RESS, ��2984 4 EGRESS `ND UBLIVES_ I IN JANUARY. 2016 Ag r - 1 =80' Cl \70597, � I I 45158 O RYNEA L. EDWARDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPUTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER \ I b I - o 2 I II13 D4 1 o ol I SEE SHEET 2 FOR DETAIL 3 to m II � �Iloa� I-- 30'(DNR QR -2446)& ---------------- -2446) J III Q(ONR CR 30' /8\ R/W PIPE UNE EASEMENT 50' \ ={I--`=_________ ==J z 30' I R50' 131 s:49' 5 89'1]'39" W 1330.33' ARGENT ROAD S 89'1544" W 1330.40' 30'(ONR CR -3095)Q �-- / N CURVE TABLE LINE TABLE AMENDMENT LINE BEARING DISTANCE PASCO 16 Ll S 76'37'50"E 36.41' L2 S 71.57.50• E 1164.42' SEGREGATION SURVEY L3 S 61'37'50" E 192.19' L4 5 61'37'50" E 94.85' LS S 88'17'50 E 96.38' 16 N 8952'10" E 107.96' L7 S 78'27'50" E 40.37' La S 53'17'50" E 87.37' THIS SEGREGATION SURVEY IS TO L9 S 74'0750" E 38.20' AMEND AND REPLACE "PASCO 16 u1 N 7927'50" E 127.55' L11 S 81'17'50" E 316. 05' SEGREGATION SURVEY FILED UNDER L12 S 53'47'51" E 03.51' AFH. 1628912 RECORDS OF L13 S 52'54405" E 206.16' FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. L14 S 66056'15" E 501.OV THE NEW LOT CONFIGURATION L15 S 66'56'15" E 270.00' CREATES 7 LOTS INSTEAD OF 11 L16 S 68'38'07" E 143.05' LOTS. L17 S 44'16'40 E 133.64' LIB N 862321" E 173.44' 119 N 78'20'30" E 100.00' L20 S BT29'37" E 87.36' 1" = 400 FEET L21 S 87'29'37" E 7.61' L22 N 24'31'45' WT 85.64' 0 200 400. 800 WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM SOUTH ZONE. NA063191 BASIS OF BEARING: EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES: WASHINGTON COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 83/91 SOUTH ZONE DATA THIMBLE R8/2 GPS RECEIVER. INITIAL CONTROL POINTS FROM FRANKLIN REGIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT WERE ESTABLISHED FROM RES TO THE WSRN NETWORK CONTROL POINT N0. 1511 N. 341159.34 E. 1974390.99 AND THEN CONSTRAINED TO FRANKLIN REGIONAL CONTROL CONTROL POINT NO. 1507 N:339246.30 E. 1969027.01 POINT NO'S: 1511 AND 1501 CORNERS WERE DUALLY TIED TO ESTABLISH 2 MEASUREMENTS. THE RELATIVE ACCURACY DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCE STANDARDS WERE MET AS SPECIFIED IN WAC 331-130-080. COMBINED SCALE FACTOR = 0.99991342 LEGEND: N� � FOUND MONUMENT. f + �4 CALCULATED CORNER S 09'17'14" W 2642.59' 1l5 7 11 o, R50' R 1 \ /W FOR INGRESS, \ 50 I ^I EORESS AND UDUIIES - CHAPEL E HILL BLVD --S 85'0759" 356.76'- 1285.87' 7 50 J__ ----929.11- LOT 4 38.09 Acres K C11 LOT 5 / / I 30.05 Acres I /LOT 6 o / / J 13.11 ACRES / /6 6 / 1046.97- N 89'1740" E AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 5� FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 2016 THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR 1 4 1A / UNDER MY DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS AT M. IN BOOK OF SURVEYS AT PAGE OF THE SURVEY RECORDING ACT AT THE REQUEST OF THE (p AT THE REQUEST OF THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 3 061'- 4 _____ 167J.93' IN JANUARY. 2016 Ag r - NATURAL RESOURCES. -- N 45158 O RYNEA L. EDWARDS CERTIFICATE NUMBER FRANKLIN COUNTY DEPUTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S FILE NUMBER /LOT 6 o / / J 13.11 ACRES / /6 6 / 1046.97- N 89'1740" E N 34'40'19" E RADIAL\l 1, PETER GOLOMARK, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ACRNG FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY CERTIFY. THAT THE MAP ENTITLED 'AMENDMENT PASCO 15 SEGREGATION SURVEY, UPON WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS INSCRIBED, IS PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF WASHINGTON STATE LAWS, 2013 2ND SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 19, SECRON 3238 ---- FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PER CHAPTER 79.11 RCW. I� ITIS ALSO NOTED THAT A DULY AUDITOR OF TED COPY O 1TY, MAP SHALL .T FILED E O THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE `\\\ ORIGINAL COPY SHALL BE OLEO IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC � LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WA. s WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE __ DAY OF 2015. �I ry T.9N., R,29E. (DNR CR -2446) 3Q PETER RK COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS IT 89'18'23" E 1329.79' 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY IN SECTION 16 PASCO 16 FIELD CREW.. LINK, SEILER EDWARDS TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M. FIELD BOOK: SEI STATE OF WASHINGTON 110612016 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 4 F.M.p LAND SURVEY SECTION—P.O. BOX 47030 1848,2 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7030 (360)902-1206 r'1 Irrr 4 -r 1 Exhibit A - O FOUND REBARS NOT ACCEPTED 5� FOUND ROADWAY MONUMENTS 1 4 1A / SEE SHEET 3 FOR CORNER NOTES n SEE SHEET 3 FOR EASEMENT NOTES 1 3 061'- 4 _____ 167J.93' Ag r - _ ------ -- 5 COMMISSIONERS CERTIFICATION \ I STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF THURSTON N 34'40'19" E RADIAL\l 1, PETER GOLOMARK, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS ACRNG FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY CERTIFY. THAT THE MAP ENTITLED 'AMENDMENT PASCO 15 SEGREGATION SURVEY, UPON WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE IS INSCRIBED, IS PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF WASHINGTON STATE LAWS, 2013 2ND SPECIAL SESSION, CHAPTER 19, SECRON 3238 ---- FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PER CHAPTER 79.11 RCW. I� ITIS ALSO NOTED THAT A DULY AUDITOR OF TED COPY O 1TY, MAP SHALL .T FILED E O THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY AUDITOR OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON. THE `\\\ ORIGINAL COPY SHALL BE OLEO IN THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC � LANDS AT OLYMPIA, WA. s WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL THE __ DAY OF 2015. �I ry T.9N., R,29E. (DNR CR -2446) 3Q PETER RK COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS IT 89'18'23" E 1329.79' 16 SEGREGATION SURVEY IN SECTION 16 PASCO 16 FIELD CREW.. LINK, SEILER EDWARDS TOWNSHIP 09 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M. FIELD BOOK: SEI STATE OF WASHINGTON 110612016 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 4 F.M.p LAND SURVEY SECTION—P.O. BOX 47030 1848,2 OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504-7030 (360)902-1206 r'1 Irrr 4 -r 1 Exhibit A - Improvements to Chapel Hill Boulevard (Road 68 to Road 84) and Road 76 (Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard) Chapel Hill Boulevard Measurements Length(Roadway) 6600 Curbs LF 13860 Sidewalk (SY) 10780 Street Lights each 92 Striping LS 1 Landscaping LS 1 Median Curbs (LF) 7000 Pavement (SY) 48400 Embankment (CY) 48889 Excavation (CY) 48889 Water line (16") 6600 Irrigation 16" 6600 Sanitary Sewer 15" 6600 Storm Water LS 1 Traffic Signals Each 5 Mobilization 5% Desi (10%) Construction Management 10% Contingency 15% Road 76 Measurements Length 2900 Curbs LF 6090 Sidewalk (SY) 4737 Street Lights each 41 Striping LS 1 Landscaping (LS) 1 Median Curbs LF 4000 Pavement (SY) 21267 Embankment (CY) 21481 Excavation CY 21481 Water line 16") 3000 Irrigation (16") 3000 Sanitary Sewer (15") 3000 Storm Water LS 1 Traffic Signals Each 2 Mobilization (5% Desi 10% Construction Management 10% Contingency (15%) EXHIBIT B Page 13 of 45 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 19, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/25/16 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Fire Safety Inspection Program First Year Summary I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: DISCUSSION III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In August of 2014, City Council re-established the Fire Safety Inspection Program. The City had not had a formal inspection program since 1987 and substantial industrial, commercial and residential growth in the years following 1987 raised concern that the City's "5" Fire Safety Rating would be reduced - adversely impacting rates for insurance city-wide. Council's role in re-establishing the Fire Safety Inspection Program, as well as participating in automatic aid, providing training program improvements, working to regionalize the communication system, increasing public fire safety educator certification and improvements to fire fighting resources all resulted in retaining the City's "5" Rating. As assured to Council in 2014 - tonight's presentation will provide a summary of the Program after a full year of implementation. V. DISCUSSION: Troy Hendren, the Inspection Services Manager, will present the 2015 Program results in a PowerPoint presentation. Page 14 of 45 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 19, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/25/16 FROM: Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Vehicular Parking and Storage I. REFERENCE(S): II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: DISCUSSION III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In January this year, Council received input from a citizen that was concerned with long term parking of vehicles on public streets. In that situation, the vehicle was licensed, not obviously disabled, was accumulating debris underneath as it had not moved for a long period of time and was owned by a person near to where the vehicle is parked. It appeared obvious the public street was being used for vehicle storage. Complaints with the Police Department and Code Enforcement were lodged. As the vehicle was on a public street, Code Enforcement did not have jurisdiction through the Pasco Municipal Code. As the vehicle was licensed and was not by definition "junk" or "abandoned, " the Police Department was not able to cite the vehicle's owner for a traffic or code offense. An inventory of applicable PMC regulations as well as the applicable State law and Administrative Code confirm that this situation does not fall cleanly into a category for enforcement. For example: Title 9 of the PMC (Nuisances) regulates nuisances but basically limits regulating vehicles to those "abandoned, "junk" or determined to be "vehicle hulks." Page 15 of 45 Title 10 of the PMC (Vehicles and Traffic) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings on public streets but not if the vehicle is less than 14,000 lbs. gross weight, is licensed and isn't a recreational vehicle (including RV's, boats, trailers...). Title 12 of the PMC (Streets and Sidewalks) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings including spillage of material on public streets, parking on swales or planting strips or otherwise interfering with normal use of the street - but not the parking (even for long periods) of licensed and maintained vehicles. Title 25 of the PMC (Zoning) regulates vehicles in a variety of settings but limits the regulations to those occurring on private property. V. DISCUSSION: Staff has researched regulations from other municipalities and concluded that the most direct way to address issues of this type is to amend the PMC to provide a restriction on the parking of vehicles on public streets for longer than a set amount of time and/or other locations. There are details to account for in revisions of the PMC - namely the amount of time established as a threshold for enforcement; preclusion of ways to circumvent applicable regulations; impacts on service levels of existing staff and unintended consequences such as an increase in the amount of impounded vehicles. Staff would benefit from Council discussion and direction on this issue. Page 16 of 45 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 19, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/25/16 Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director FROM: Dan Ford, City Engineer Public Works SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) Plan I. REFERENCE(S): Storm Water Drainage System Map Professional Services Agreement (PSA) Summary Sheet II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: Utility Fund (Stormwater) - $147,647 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Pasco is a Phase II Eastern Washington Municipal Stormwater Permittee with the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE). Pasco's current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit runs from August 1, 2014 through July 31, 2019. Per the requirements set forth in Section S5. Stormwater Management Program for Cities, Towns and Counties of the Permit, Pasco is required to have both a Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) and a Stormwater Management Program Plan (Plan) that details all aspects of the City's SWMP. Pasco's current four page Plan has not kept pace with DOE changes to stormwater rules and regulations and needs major updating. Key components to be documented in the Plan include: Public Education and Outreach; Public Involvement and Participation; Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination; Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control; Post -Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment; and Municipal Operations and Maintenance. Additionally, the Plan will evaluate the effect of the City's current stormwater utility Page 17 of 45 structure, land use regulations and policies, and existing infrastructure maintenance with regard to risk management, environmental stewardship, and regulatory compliance. The Plan will set near and long term (5-10 year) planning goals and prioritize a list of needed capital improvement projects to correct existing deficiencies within the system and to construct future stormwater mitigation infrastructure. Finally, the Plan will provide the City with a tool to perform a rate study and evaluate our current stormwater charges for future stormwater related capital improvements and existing infrastructure maintenance and improvement. Pasco has five drainage basins tributary to the Columbia River within the City limits. Two of the basins discharge along the shore of the river, while the remaining three basins discharge to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ditch located behind the Columbia River dike. The five basins total just under 4,000 acres in size and are all situated south of I-182, east of US -395, and west of SR -12 and generally encompass the downtown core area of Pasco. The remaining stormwater runoff within the City generally infiltrates to the underlying native soils in accordance with City regulations first enacted in 1983. `Chapter 16.05 - Impervious Surfaces' from the City's Municipal Code regulates the surface drainage of private properties within the City and states "An impervious surface improvement shall be designed to drain, confine and/or impound storm water or site -generated water within the private property upon which the improvement is to be located." City owned right-of-way improvements are also required to provide on-site mitigation measures. Fortunately for the citizens of Pasco, the low annual precipitation and high permeability of underlying soils makes infiltration a successful mitigation practice. One component of the Plan will define the direction for the City's effort to retrofit existing stormwater infrastructure currently discharging directly to the Columbia River, with the ultimate goal of eliminating all surface water discharges. The Plan will ensure the retrofit program occurs in a manner that is consistent with the priorities of the City, its citizens and the DOE. On December 7, 2015, the Pasco City Council adopted the Capital Projects Budget for the year 2016. One component of the adopted Budget provides for the creation of a Storm Water Master Plan. It is the City's intent to have a consultant with strong knowledge of applicable federal, state, and local regulations and standards governing the Phase II Eastern Washington Municipal Stormwater Permit, the Stormwater Management Manual for Eastern Washington, and the Eastern Washington Low Impact Development Guidance Manual, initiate and complete all aspects of the MS4 Plan. V. DISCUSSION: In November of 2015, Staff issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to provide services for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Storm Sewer System (MS4) Plan. Page 18 of 45 On December 22, 2015, the City received responses from two consultants. During December 2015/January 2016, Staff reviewed the two submittals and independently rated the consultants using the same Consultant Criteria Ranking Form for each. The rating panel included representatives from Engineering and Operations. On January 6, 2016, in-person interviews were conducted with the two consultants. Staff independently rated the consultants using an established Interview Ranking Form and the rating panel felt confident, based upon these interviews, of the final selection. Herrerra Environmental Consultants, Inc., was selected by the rating panel to be most qualified consultant to complete the MS4 Plan. Scope and Fee contract negotiations were conducted during January 2016. Herrerra's Scope of Services includes the following elements: Task 1.0 - Project Management and Communications, Task 2.0 - Review Existing Data and Documentation, Task 3.0 - Program Evaluation and Needs Assessment, Task 4.0 - Capital Improvement Program for Storm Water Facilities, and Task 5.0 - Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. Page 19 of 45 Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: Professional Services Agreement for the 2016 Comprehensive Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Plan Consultant: Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc. Address: 1220 41h Avenue East, Olympia, WA 98506 Scope of Services: To complete all aspects of the Storm Water Master Plan. Term: Completion Date: July 31, 2016 Payments to Consultant: ❑ Hourly Rate: ❑ Fixed Sum of - 0 Other: not to exceed $147.647 Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: ❑ $1,000,000 each occurrence; ❑ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or ❑X $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: © $1,000,000 per claim; ❑ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or ❑ $ per claim; and $ per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Signature by: ❑ Mayor ❑X City Manager Page 21 of 45 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 20, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/25/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance Interlocal Agreement I. REFERENCE(S): December 23, 2015 letter from Benton Franklin Counties Department of Human Services and proposed Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance Interlocal Agreement II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discusion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In 2005, the State Legislature approved House Bill (HB) 2163 which authorized a $10.00 surcharge for certain recorded documents. The surcharge is to be used to develop plans and programs to reduce homelessness. RCW 36.22.179 directs 2% of the funds collected be retained by the County Auditor and 60% retained by the county where the funds were collected and used to accomplish the purposes of the local homeless housing plan/program. Of that 60% retained by the County, 6% may be used for costs related to administration of the homeless housing plan/program. The remaining funds are remitted to Washington State for deposit in the state homeless housing account. In December of 2005, the City approved the initial Interlocal Agreement for a 10 -year period with Franklin County, Connell, Mesa and Kahlotus regarding local homeless housing programs and plans. In January of 2006, City Council approved a 10 -year plan for reducing homelessness. The 2005 Interlocal Agreement charged CAC with the responsibility of administering HB 2163 funds. In 2012, the Interlocal Agreement was amended to direct the Benton Page 22 of 45 Franklin Counties Department of Human Services (BFHS) to have administrative responsibility for these same funds. V. DISCUSSION: Staff has reviewed the new Interlocal. Points of note are as follows: 1. The Agreement shall be in force for a period of 10 years. Any party, however, may terminate their membership upon written notice given at least six (6) months prior to January 1 of any year. 2. The County's 6% administrative collection may be used to compensate an independent contractor for continued development and implementation of the homeless housing plan. 3. The homeless housing plan includes such activities as providing operating subsidies or vouchers, assistance with rent or furnishings; developing affordable housing; outreach and homeless prevention services as well as temporary assistance to prevent or transition from homelessness; the collection of data and census information to assist in the development of strategies and programs to further the goal of reducing homelessness. 4. The Interlocal specifically states that the Agreement "does not provide for the acquisition, holding or disposal of property." The Agreement provides that each City may appoint two (2) representatives to the Benton Franklin Housing Continuum of Care advisory group to the Benton Franklin Counties Department of Human Services. Currently, Jeff Adams (Planner I) serves as the only City of Pasco representative. Staff recommends approval of the Agreement so that the continuity of the program and services may be maintained. Page 23 of 45 BENTON AND FRANK.LIN COUNTIES DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES December 23, 2015 Mayor Matt Watkins City of Pasco 525 North 3rd Pasco, WA 99301 Re. Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance Interlocal Agreement Dear Mayor Watkins: Inclosed please find a final revised version of the renewal of Franklin County Homeless Housing and Assistance (2163) Interlocal Agreement which was approved as to form by the Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney's Office on December 22, 2015. The term of the Interlocal Agreement shall be ten (10) years from the date of execution. As you may be aware, funds for the 2163 Homeless Housing Assistance agreement are from document recording fees, dependent on the local economy. For the last few years Department of Human Services has administered and dispersed these funds to community case organizations within the community to provide homeless housing services to residents of Franklin County. The renewal of the Interlocal Agreement will allow for continued services within Franklin County. During this last year new projects and service providers have come forth and the goal is to provide a wide range of comprehensive services. Please review the enclosed Interlocal document, sign and return all 2 original signature pages to the Department of Human Services, so that we may proceed with the execution of the Interlocal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, els ullivan Administrator Department of Human Services 71.02 WESTOKANOGAN PLACE, SUITE 201 + KENNEWICK, WA 99336 PHONE (509) 783-5284 + FAX (509) 783-5981 Page 24 of 45 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of Pasco City of Connell City of Mesa City of Kahlotus 525 North 3`d PO Box 1200 PO Box 146 PO Box 100 Pasco, WA 99301 Connell, WA 99326 Mesa, WA 99343 Kahlotus, WA 99335 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, AND: THE CITY OF PASCO, THE CITY OF CONNELL, THE CITY OF MESA, AND THE CITY OF KAHLOTUS; IN PROVIDING FOR LOCAL HOMELESS HOUSING AND ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS/PLANS This Interlocal Agreement, hereinafter referred to as "Agreement", is entered into as of the day of , 20 between Franklin County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," with its principal offices located at 1016 North 4th Avenue, Pasco Washington, 99301; the City of Pasco, a municipal corporation with its principal offices located at 525 North Third, Pasco, Washington 99301; the City of Connell, a municipal corporation with its principal offices located at 104 E Adams Street, Connell, Washington, 99326-1200; the City of Mesa, a municipal corporation with its principal offices located at 103 Franklin Street, Mesa, Washington 99343; the City of Kahlotus, a municipal corporation with its principal offices located at E 130 Weston, Kahlotus, Washington 99335; hereinafter all the aforementioned cities referred to collectively as "CITIES." This Agreement is entered into by the COUNTY under the authority of RCW 36.32.120, RCW 36.22.179, and Chapter 43.1850 RCW. This Agreement is entered into by the CITIES under authority of RCW 36.22.179 and Chapter 43.1850 RCW. This Agreement is in conformity with Chapter 39.34 RCW, the Interlocal Cooperation Act, To carry out the purposes of this Agreement and in consideration of the benefits to be received by each party it is agreed as follows: Sec. 1. Purpose: The purpose of this Agreement shall be to provide for the collection, administration, and expenditure of RCW 36.22.179 funds (also commonly referred to as "HHAA" or "2163" funds, after the name and number of the enacting legislation) to accomplish the purposes of chapter 484, Laws of 2005, RCW 36.22.179, and Chapter 43.185C RCW in the COUNTY'S and CITIES' providing of local homeless housing programs/plans. Sec. 2. Parties: The parties to this Agreement shall be Franklin County, the City of Pasco, the City of Connell, the City of Mesa, and the City of Kahlotus. Sec. 3. Term: This Agreement shall be for ten (10) years from the date of execution unless any party elects to terminate the Agreement per the termination clause of this Agreement. Renewal of this Agreement shall be by separate written agreement of the parties. Sec. 4. The COUNTY shall: 1) By resolution approve and operate a homeless housing program/plan as authorized per Chapter 43.185C RCW. Page 25 of 45 2) File the homeless housing program/plan with the State of Washington Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development. 3) Collect all funds authorized by RCW 36.22.179. 4) By ordinance create a Homeless Housing and Assistance Fund or Account for deposit of the specified percentage of RCW 36.22.179 funds detailed in Section 4(5)(ii) of this Agreement. 5) Administer all collected RCW 36.22.179 funds in the following sequential order as follows: i) Retain two percent (2%) of all funds collected under RCW 36.22.179 as a COUNTY collection fee. ii) Deposit sixty percent (60%) of the remaining balance of collected RCW 36.22.179 funds into the Homeless Housing and Assistance Fund, six percent (6%) of which subsequently may be paid to the COUNTY general fund to satisfy its administrative costs related to the homeless housing program/plan, and the balance used by the COUNTY for programs that directly accomplish the goals of the Benton and Franklin Counties 10 Year Homeless Housing Plan and in accordance with RCW 43.185C.050, as now in effect or hereafter amended. iii) The remaining portion of the funds collected under RCW 36.22.179 funds shall be remitted to the State Treasurer for deposit in the State's homeless housing account. 6) The COUNTY may enter into a separate Professional Services Agreement with an independent contractor to assist with the continued development and management of the Franklin County homeless housing plan referenced above, and the implementation thereof; and use any or all of the six percent referenced above to pay for such services. 7) The Benton and Franklin Counties Department of Human Services is designated as the representative of the COUNTY and as the "local government" as defined in the Act for administering ESSHB 2163 and ESSHB 1359 funds retained by the COUNTY Auditor pursuant to the Act, to be used for the following purposes, within Franklin County: i) Rental and furnishings of units for the use of homeless persons. ii) Costs of developing affordable housing for homeless persons and services for formerly homeless individuals and families residing in transitional housing or permanent housing and still at risk of homelessness. iii) Operating subsidies for transitional housing or permanent housing serving formerly homeless families or individuals. iv) Services to prevent homelessness, such as emergency eviction prevention programs including temporary rental subsidies to prevent homelessness. v) Temporary services to assist persons leaving state institutions and other state programs to prevent them from becoming or remaining homeless. vi) Outreach services for homeless individuals and families. 2 Page 26 of 45 vii) Development and management of local homeless plans including homeless census data collection; identification of goals, performance measures, strategies, and costs and evaluation of progress towards established goals. viii) Rental vouchers payable to landlords for persons who are homeless or below thirty percent of the median income or in immediate danger of becoming homeless. ix) Other activities to reduce and prevent homelessness as identified for funding in the local plan. x) Other duties as required by the State of Washington and the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development such as the COUNTY'S administration of the annual Point in Time Count, submission of data and required reports, participation in a Homeless Management Information System (HMIS), and coordination of a countywide homeless housing taskforce. Sec. 5. Each City shall: 1) Be authorized to appoint two (2) persons to the Benton Franklin Housing Continuum of Care which shall serve in an advisory capacity to the Benton and Franklin Counties Department of Human Services. These seats may be filled with elected officials or designees, to be determined by the individual city. 2) This right is in return for the CITIES decision to not receive funds collected by the COUNTY under RCW 36.22.1791 for the purpose of operating their own homeless housing program as authorized by RCW 43.185C.080. The funds collected by the COUNTY under RCW 36.22.1791 instead shall be directed towards programs that accomplish the goals of the COUNTY's homeless housing program. 3) By executing this Agreement, the CITIES authorize the COUNTY to contract for services, as referenced in Section 4(6) of this Agreement. Sec. 6. Mutual Cooperation: All parties to this Agreement agree to provide mutual cooperation and make good faith efforts to assist one another in fulfilling the terms of this Agreement. Sec. 7. No Property Acquisition or Joint Financing: This Agreement does not provide for the acquisition, holding, or disposal of property other than the funds collected hereunder. Nor does this Agreement contemplate the financing of any joint or cooperative undertaking. There shall be no budget maintained for any joint or cooperative undertaking pursuant to this Agreement. Sec. 8. Termination: Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, any party may terminate this Agreement effective January 1 st of any given year by giving written notice of intent to terminate by July 1 st of the preceding year (providing at least 6 months notice), with the termination to become effective no earlier than January 1 st of the following year. Such notice of termination shall be by appropriate action of the elected governing body of the terminating party and shall be provided to all parties subject to this Agreement. Sec. 9, Notice: Any formal notice or communication to be given under this Agreement shall be deemed properly given, if delivered, or if mailed postage prepaid and addressed: Page 27 of 45 To: Franklin County Attn: County Administrator 1016 North 4'h Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 To: City of Connell 104 E Adams Street P.Q. Box 1200 Connell, WA 99326-1200 To: City of Kahbtus E. 130 Weston P.O. Box 100 Kahlotus, WA 99335 To: City of Pasco 525 North Third Pasco, WA 99301 To: City of Mesa 103 Franklin Street P.O. Box 146 Mesa, WA 99343 Sec. 10. Independent Contractors: The parties and their employees or agents performing under this Agreement are not deemed to be employees, officers, or agents of the other parties to this Agreement and shall be considered independent contractors. Sec. 11. Record Keeping: All parties to this Agreement shall maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence that properly reflect all costs of any nature expended in the performance of this Agreement. Such records shall reflect financial procedures and practices, participant records, statistical records, property and materials records, and supporting documentation. These records shall be subject at all reasonable times to review and audit by the parties to this Agreement, the Office of the Washington State Auditor, and other officials so authorized by law. Sec. 12. Non -Discrimination: All parties to this Agreement certify that they are equal opportunity employers. Sec. 13. Liability: Each party to this Agreement shall assume the risk of, be liable for, and pay all damage, loss, cost and expense of its officers, officials, and employees arising out of any duty performed, or not performed, while acting in good faith within the scope of this Agreement. Sec. 14. No Third -Party Beneficiaries: The parties to this Agreement do not intend by this Agreement to assume any contractual obligations to anyone other than the parties to this Agreement. The parties do not intend that there be any third -party beneficiaries. Sec. 15. Assignment: No parties to this Agreement shall have the right to transfer or assign, in whole or in part, any or all of its obligations and rights hereunder without the prior written consent of the other parties. Sec. 16. Amendments or Modifications: This Agreement may be amended, altered, or changed in any manner by the mutual written consent of all parties. Sec. 17. Waiver: No waiver by any party of any term or condition of this Agreement shall be deemed or construed to constitute a waiver of any other term or condition or of any subsequent breach, whether of the same or a different provision of this Agreement. 11 Page 28 of 45 Sec. 18. Severability: If any of the provisions contained in this Agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect. Sec. 19. Administrator Designee for this Interlocal Cooperation Agreement: The Board of Franklin County Commissioners is designated as the administrator responsible for overseeing and administering this Agreement which provides for a joint and cooperative undertaking. Sec. 20. Filing: Copies of this Agreement shall be filed with the Franklin County Auditor and the Secretary of State after execution of this Agreement by all parties. Sec. 21. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed by facsimile and in any number of current parts and signature pages hereof with the same effect as if all parties to this Agreement had all signed the same document. All executed current parts shall be construed together, and shall, together with the text of this Agreement, constitute one and the same instrument. Sec. 22. Effective: This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by all of the parties and recording with the Franklin County Auditor. Dated this day of , 20_ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON Brad Peck Rick Miller Robert E. Koch Attest: Approved as to Form: Clerk of the Board D uty Prosecuting Attorney 5 Page 29 of 45 CITY OF PASCO Dame: Title: Attest: Approved as to Form: Title: Title: Page 30 of 45 CITY OF PASCO Name: Title: Attest: Approved as to Form: Title: Title: Page 31 of 45 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 20, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/25/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Report on Sale of 2015 Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds I. REFERENCE(S): Closing Memorandum dated December 17, 2015 IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The sale of the City's 2015 Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds was closed on December 22, 2015. (See attached closing memorandum for details.) With Standard and Poors reaffirming the City's bond rating of AA-, the sale went smoothly and produced favorable interest rates for the issue. Summary of the transaction: Principal amount of bonds sold: $14,380,000.00 All in total interest cost: 3.71 % Amount available for water/sewer projects: $10,500,000.00 Deposit to debt service reserve: $1,178,228.14 Escrow account for refunding bonds: $4,153,143.45 (2002- $1,160,000; 2005 - $2,605,000; 2007 - $315,000) Net present value savings on refunded bonds: $407,645 Net original premium/discount: $1,595,529 Costs of issuance - underwriter's discount: $64,330 Itemized costs: $78,030 - Total Costs: $142,360 V. DISCUSSION: Page 32 of 45 Page 33 of 45 Piperjaffray. SEATTLE-NORTHWEST DIVISION Closing Memorandum 1300SW Fifth Ave, Surae 3650, Pordand, OR 97201 Tel: 503-275-8300 1 Fax:503-275-8320 Piper Jaffray & Co. Since 1895. Member SIPC and NYSE. Re: City of Pasco, Washington $14,380,000 Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2015 Dated Date: December 22, 2015 From: Brendan Watkins, Associate Piper ]affray - Seattle -Northwest Division Date: December 17, 2015 CClosinf Closing will occur at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time, December 22, 2015 via conference call: Dial -in: (888) 212-4616 Passcode: 713 092 5864 Calculation of Funds The following is a summary of the sources of funds for the Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2015 and how these funds are to be applied by the City. Total source of funds for the transaction is calculated as follows: Principal Amount Plus: Net Original Issue Premium/Discount Total Sources of Funds ("Production" on the Bond Pricing Report) Piper will transfer funds on December 22, 2015, as follows: Total Sources of Funds Less: Underwriter's Discount Net Proceeds Transferred by Piper Application of Funds The total of $15,911,198.72 will be applied by the City as follows: Wired to City: Available for Projects Debt Service Reserve Account Contingency (for deposit to P&I Account in Bond Fund) Total Funds distributed directly to the City Wired to U.S. Bank N.A.(Refunding Trustee): Estimated Issuance Costs (see Exhibit A) Escrow Account deposit wired to Escrow Agent Total Funds distributed to U.S. Bank N.A. Total Distribution of Funds $ 14,380,000.00 1,595,529.40 15975.529.40 $ 15,975,529.40 (64,330.68) $ 15,911,198.72 $ 10,500,000.00 1,178,228.14 1,797.13 $ 11,680,025.27 $ 78,030.00 4,153,143.45 $ 4,231,173.45 15,911,198.72 Page 34 of 45 Funds Transfers Piper Jaffray & Co. will initiate the following wire transactions: Proceeds to the City Transfer Amount: To: ABA Number: Account Name: Account Number: Reference: Contact: Proceeds to the Escrow Agent Transfer Amount: To: ABA Number: Account Number: Reference: Contact: $11,680,025.27 (Federal Funds) U.S. Bank of Washington, Pasco Branch 125 000105 City of Pasco 1535 9502 0428 City of Pasco, 2015 Water & Sewer Ref. Bonds Callie Sims (509) 735-2243 $4,231,173.45 (Federal Funds) U.S. Bank National Association 091 000 022 1801 2116 7365 Pasco WSRRB 15 (02 05 07) Esc Greg Skutnik (206) 344-4607 If you have questions, please call me at (503) 275-8300. Attachment: Exhibit A cc: Stan Strebel, City of Pasco Rick Terway, City of Pasco Ron Musson, City of Pasco Bill Tonkin, Foster Pepper PLLC Shelly Haze, Foster Pepper PLLC Alan Dashen, Northwest Municipal Advisors Scott Bauer, Northwest Municipal Advisors Malinda Okerlund, Northwest Municipal Advisors Carolyn Morrison, U.S. Bank N.A. Ryan Brennan, U.S. Bank N.A. Greg Skutnik, U.S. Bank N.A. John Peterson, Piper Jaffray & Co. Sarah Miles, Piper Jaffray & Co. Kay Eskildsen, Piper Jaffray & Co. FICM Accounting, Piper Jaffray & Co. Page 2 Page 35 of 45 Page 3 EXHIBIT A City of Pasco, Washington Water and Sewer Improvement and Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2015 Estimated issuance expenses to be paid by the Refunding Trustee: Description Payee Total Wired to U.S Bank N.A. Rating Fees Standard & Poor's Ratings Services $ 12,750.00 Bond Counsel Foster Pepper PLLC 46,000.00 Financial Advisor Northwest Municipal Advisors 15,880.00 Escrow Agent U.S. Bank National Association 1,000.00 Escrow Verification Grant Thornton LLP 2,400.00 Total Costs of Issuance Page 36 of 45 2 CL 0 3.2 a � w ' w u r 0 T �- pE u° Ln �a LolIL T v m W 00 0 h Financing Goals + Produce funds when needed for construction projects ■ December 2015 closing date + Secure low interest rates and achieve refunding savings Maintain the City's high credit ratings Received underlying rating (AA-) Reduced reserve fund requirement + Maintain the City's high credit rating ■ Received underlying rating (AA-) ■ Reduced reserve fund requirement + Minimize interest cost and create future bond capacity ■ Final maturity of December 1, 2040 (25 years) 1 Piperjaffray Interest Rate Environment The Bond Buyer Index is a measurement of interest rates. Interest rates are set when bonds are sold, and lower interest rates result in lower tax rates for the bonds. General Obligation Bond Buyer Index History 13.00% i 12.00% _ .. __ __. __ One -Year Snapshot 11.00% 5.00 % _ _._ v 4.50% 10.00°!° 4.00% I _ id I y 9.00% 3.50% 8.00% 3.00% Nov -14 Feb -15 May -15 Aug -15 Nov -15 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.000/16 - - -- --- — - - 3.00% v Nov -90 Nov -95 NOV-00 Nov -05 CD W co 0h 2 cn Nov -10 Nov- t5 Piper Jaffe ay v e� m 0 0 h Bond Refunding Results SUMMARY OF REFUNDING RESULTS City of Pasco, Washington Water and Sewer Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 Final Pricing Numbers Dated Date 12/22/2015 Delivery Date 12/22/2015 Arbitrage yield 3.175620% Escrow yield 0.603683% Value of Negative Arbitrage 21,670.08 Bond Par Amount 3,780,000.00 True Interest Cost 1.880595% Net Interest Cost 2.012279% All -In TIC 1,992941% Average Coupon 3956048% Average Life 5.419 Par amount of refunded bonds 4,080,000.00 Average coupon of refunded bonds 4.253550% Average life of refunded bonds 5.265 PV of prior debt to 12/22/2015 @ 3.175620% 4,328,582.74 Net PV Savings 407,645.13 Percentage savings of refunding proceeds 9.721465% 3 Piperjaffray v CD 0 Overall Water Sewer Debt Structure $9,000,000 1 - - — _ ... -... . $$,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 J ------------- ----------- - - --------------------- $5,000,000 $4,000,000 $3,000,000 $2,000,000 ■ PWTF Loans (Subordinated) --------------------------- -------- ■ SRF Loans (Subordinated) 2015 E2013 _.............- --- ---------------- 2010 ■ 2009 ■ 2009 (LILID) 2007 (ULD) 22005 ■ 2002 _ -------------------------------------------------------- MEN No I —'T-- - -- Ln M CD t I N M -T Ln tD f- W Cti C] .-i N M 4 to le 00 M O .-, N M Ln ri 0 0 0 C3 a 0 0 0 (D N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M � � �" � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0© V O O N N N'. N N N N N N N N N N N N N . . N N N N N N N N N N N N N Piperjaffray 4 Jan 14, 2016 11:06 am Prepared by Piper Jaffray & Co. - BPW (Pasco:P_R09NEW) Page 42 of 45 SUMMARY OF REFUNDING RESULTS City of Pasco, Washington Water and Sevier Revenue and Refunding Bonds, Series 2015 Final Pricing Numbers Proposed Proposed Proposed Refunding of Refunding of Refunding of Water & Sewer Water & Sewer 'Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Revenue Bonds, Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 Series 2005 Series 2007 Total Dated Date 12/22/2015 12/2212015 12/22/2015 12122/2015 Delivery Date 12/22/2015 12/22/2015 12/22/2015 12/2212015 Arbitrage Yield 3.175620% 3.175620% 3.175620%0 3.175620% Escrow Yield 0.213776% 0.213777% 0.824242% 0.606419% Value of Negative Arbitrage 2,757.80 6,252.28 12,636.46 21,646.54 Bond Par Amount 1,055,000.00 2,410,000.00 315,000.00 3,780,000.00 True Interest Cost 1.623357% 2.003309% 1.648635%0 1,880595% Net Interest Cost 1.727680%a 2,146792% 1.752924% 2.012279%4 All -In TIC 1.726297% 2.094539% 2.000562% 1.992941% Average Coupon 4.000000%'q 3.941896% 3.931710% 3.956048% Average Life 4.965 5.736 4.513 5.419 Par amount of refunded bonds 1,160,000.00 2,605,000.00 315,000.00 4,080,000.00 Average coupon of refunded bonds 4.493621% 4.110823% 4,750000% 4.253550% Average life of refunded bonds 4.972 5.517 4.263 5.265 PV of prior debt 1,232,618.81 2,756,933.89 339,030.04 4,328,582.74 Net PV Savings 139,562.14 253,285.26 14,821.26 407,668.66 Percentage savings of refunded bonds 12.031219% 9.723043% 4.705162% 9.991879% Jan 14, 2016 11:06 am Prepared by Piper Jaffray & Co. - BPW (Pasco:P_R09NEW) Page 42 of 45 SAVINGS City of Pasco, Washington Proposed Refunding of Water &. Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2002 Series 2oo2 Ref. Final Pricing Numbers Present Value Date Prior Debt Service Refunding Debt Service Savings Annual Savings to 12/22/2015 @ 3.1756202% 06/01/2016 25,975.00 18,638.33 7,336.67 - 7,235.28 12/01/2016 25,975.00 21,100.00 4,875.00 12,211.67 4,732.49 06/01/2.017 25,975.00 21,100.00 4,875.00 - 4,658.52 12/01/2017 25,975.00 21,100.00 4,875.00 9,750.00 4,585.71 06/01/2018 25,975.00 21,100.00 4,875.00 - 4,514,03 12/01/2018 25,975.00 21,100.00 4,875.00 9,750.00 4,443.48 06/01/2019 25,975.00 21,100.00 4,875.00 - 4,374.03 12/01/2019 395,975.00 361,100.00 34,875.00 39,750.00 30,802.05 06/01/2020 17,881.25 14,300.00 3,581.25 - 3,113.57 12/01/2020 402,881.25 364,300.00 38,581.25 42,162.50 33,018.59 06/01/2021 9,315.00 7,300.00 2,015.00 - 1,697.52 12/01/2021 414,315,00 372,300.00 42,015.00 44,030.00 34,842.02 1,422,192.50 1,264,538.33 157,654.17 157,654.17 138,017.30 Savings Summary PV of savings from cash flow Plus: Refunding funds on hand Net PV Savings 138,017.30 1,544.84 139,562.14 Jan 14, 2016 11:06 am Prepared by Piper Jaffray & Co. - BPW (Pasco:F—R09NEW) Page 43 of 45 SAVINGS City of Pasco, Washington Proposed Refunding of Water & Sewer Revenue Bands, Series 2005 Series 20055 Ref. Final Pricing Numbers Date Prior Debt Service Refunding Debt Service Savings Annual Savings Present Value to 12/22/2015 @ 3.1756202 03/01/2016 52,996.25 - 52,996.25 52,677.18 06/01/2016 - 39,794.17 -39,794.17 -39,244.25 09/01/2016 267,996.25 - 267,996.25 - 262,219.21 12/01/2016 -2,55,050.00 -255,050.00 26,148.33 -247,594.11 03/01/2017 48,696.25 - 48,696.25 - 46,901.82 06/01/2017 - 42,950.00 -42,950.00 -41,042.76 09/01/2017 273,696.25 - 273,696.25 259,490.49 12/01/2017 - 252,950.00 -252,950.00 26,492,50 -237,939.46 03/01/2018 44,196.25 - 44,196.25 41,247.38 06/01/2018 - 39,800.00 -39,800.00 -36,853.04 09/01/2018 279,196.25 - 279,196.25 256,495.04 12/0112018 - 254,800.00 -254,800.00 28,792.50 -232,245.88 03/01/2019 39,496.25 - 39,496.25 - 35,717.71 06101/2019 - 35,500.00 -35,500.00 -31,851.90 09/01/2019 284,496.25 - 284,496.25 253,257.75 1210112019 - 260,500.00 -260,500.00 27,992.50 -230,07696 03!01/2020 34,596.25 - 34,596.25 - 30,316.12 06/0112020 - 31,000.00 -31,000.00 -26,951.66 09101/2020 289,596.25 - 289,596.25 249,802,01 12/01/2020 - 266,000.00 -266,000.00 27,192.50 -227,648.00 03/01/2021 29,496.25 - 29,496.25 25,045.41 06/01/2021 - 26,300.00 -26,300.00 -22,156.25 09101/2021 294,496.25 - 294,496.25 246,149.85 12/01/2021 - 271,300.00 -271,300.00 26,392.50 -224,982.53 03/01/2022 24,196.25 - 24,196.25 - 19,907.94 06/01/2022 - 21,400.00 -21,400.00 -17,469.13 09/01/2022 299,196.25 - 299,196.25 242,32195 12/01/2022 - 276,400.00 -276,400.00 25,592.50 -222,102.70 03/01/2023 18,696.25 - 18,696.25 - 14,905.60 06/01/2023 - 16,300.00 -16,300.00 -12,893.23 09/01/2023 303,696.25 - 303,696.25 238,337.75 12/0112023 -276,300,00 -276,300,00 29,792.50 -215,136.20 03/01/2024 12,782.50 - 12,782.50 9,874.78 06/01/2024 - 11,100.00 -11,100.00 -8,507.74 09/01/2024 307,782.50 - 307,782.50 - 234,052.96 12/01/2024 - 281,100.00 -281,100.00 28,365.00 -212,085.15 03/01/2025 6,587.50 - 6,587.50 - 4,931.16 06/01/2025 5,700.00 -5,700.00 -4,233,34 09101/2025 316,587.50 - 316,587.50 - 233,281.76 12/01/2025 - 290,700.00 -290,700.00 26,775.00 •212,525.60 3,226,480.00 2,954,944.17 273,535.83 273,535.83 253,394.00 Savings .Summary PV of savings from cash flow 253,394.00 Plus: Refunding funds on hand -108.74 Net PV Savings 253,285.26 Jan 14, 2016 11;06 am Prepared by Piper Jaffray & Co. - EPW (Pasco;P'_R09NEW) Page 44 of 45 SAVINGS City of Pasco, Washington Proposed Refunding of Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2007 Series 2007 Ref. Final Pricing Numbers Date Prior Debt Service Refunding Debt Service Savings Annual Savings Present Value to 12/22/2015 @ 3.1756202% 03/01/2016 7,481.25 - 7,481.25 - 7,436,21 06/01/2016 - 5,344.17 -5,344.17 - -5,270.32 09/01/2016 7,481.25 - 7,481.25 - 7,319.98 12101/2016 - 6,050.00 -6,050.00 3,568.33 -5,873.14 03/01/2017 7,481.25 - 7,481.25 - 7,205.57 06/01/2017 - 6,050.00 -6,050.00 - -5,781.34 09/01/2017 57,481.25 - 57,481.25 54,497.78 12/01/2017 - 56,050.00 -56,050.00 2,862.50 -52,723.89 03/01/2018 6,293.75 - 6,293.75 - 5,873.82 06/01/2018 - 5,300.00 -5,300.00 - -4,907.57 09/01/2018 56,293.75 - 56,293.75 - 51,716.55 12/01/2018 - 55,300.00 -55,300.00 1,987.50 -50,405.01 03/01/2019 5,106.25 - 5,106.25 - 4,617.74 06/0112019 - 4,300.00 -4,300.00 - -3,858.12 09/0112019 55,106.25 - 55,106.25 - 49,055.43 12/01/2019 - 54,300.00 -54,300.00 1,612.50 -47,958.46 03/01/2020 3,918.75 - 3,918.75 - 3,433.94 06/01/2020 - 3,300.00 -3,300.00 - -2,869.05 09/01/2020 58,918.75 - 58,918.75 - 50,822.56 12/01/2020 - 58,300.00 -58,300.00 1,237.50 -49,894.28 03/01/2021 2,612.50 - 2,612.50 - 2,218.29 06/01/2021 - 2,200.00 -2,200.00 -1,853.37 09/01/2021 57,612.50 - 57,612.50 - 48,154.46 12/01/2021 - 57,200.00 -57,200.00 825,00 -47,434.58 03101/2.02.2 1,306.25 - 1,306.25 - 1,074.74 06/01/2022 - 1,100.00 -1,100.00 - -897.95 09/01/2022 56,306.25 - 56,306.25 - 45,602.98 12/01/2022 - 56,100,00 -56,100.00 412.50 -45,079.46 383,400.00 370,894.17 12,505.83 12,505.83 14,223.52 Savings Summary PV of savings from cash flow 14,223.52 Plus: Refunding funds on hand 597.74 Net PV Savings 14,821.26 Jan 14, 2016 11:06 am Prepared by Piper Jaffray & Co. - BPW (Pasco:P_R09NEW) Page 45 of 45