Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016.01.11 Council Workshop PacketPage 3-7 8-10 11-12 13 - 17 18-21 22-24 Workshop Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. January 11, 2016 (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) Hanford Communities Annual Report Presented by Pam Larsen, Executive Director, Hanford Communities (b) Sidewalk Repair Program Update (c) Amend PMC 8.02 Animal Control - Refusal to Redeem (d) Repeal PMC Chapter 3.88 "Demands" (e) Charter Cable Franchise Extension (f) Road 48 Fire Station - Alternative Development Concepts (g) City Council Representation on Boards and Committees 5. MISCELLANEOUS COUNCIL DISCUSSION: 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 7. ADJOURNMENT. REMINDERS: 6:00 p.m., Monday, January 11, Conference Room #1 — Old Fire Pension Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER REBECCA FRANCIK, Rep.; SAUL MARTINEZ, Alt.) Page 1 of 24 Workshop Meeting January 11, 2016 7:00 a.m., Thursday, January 14, Cousin's Restaurant — BFCG Tri -Mats Policy Advisory Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.) 7:00 p.m., Thursday, January 14, Transit Facility — Ben -Franklin Transit Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.) 11:30 a.m., Friday, January 15 — Benton -Franklin Council of Governments Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 2 of 24 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 6, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/11/16 FROM: Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director Public Works SUBJECT: Sidewalk Repair Program - Presentation I. REFERENCE(S): Sidewalk Repair Program Map - Overview by Zone Sidewalk Repair Program - Downtown Sidewalk Repairs Completed (PowerPoint Presentation) II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: III. FISCAL IMPACT: Update and discussion IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Like most municipalities across the state and nation, the Pasco Municipal Code places responsibility for the cleaning (including snow, ice, litter and debris), maintenance and repair of a sidewalk "upon the owner of the private property directly abutting on the sidewalk." And like most municipalities, this approach generally works where repairs are minor. In Pasco, some sidewalks are approaching or past the century mark and are in great shape; other areas are seeing buckling due to trees, disruption caused by construction, businesses, or other causes. Historically, in cases where repairs to the sidewalks are significant and beyond the means of the abutting property owner to repair, significant failures have gone unaddressed, were improperly patched or, in the alternative, devolved into a costly and unproductive enforcement issue. Seeing the need to be proactive, in 2013 the City Council directed staff to conduct a city-wide survey on the condition of existing sidewalks within the public right-of-way. The survey of the sidewalks categorized the areas of concern into three different groups: Page 3 of 24 1. Sidewalks with higher tripping hazard areas, 3" or more elevation difference; 2. Sidewalks with areas of 2" to 3" elevation difference; and 3. Sidewalks with areas of 1" to 2" elevation difference. The survey identified High Concern Areas (3" lift or higher) at approximately 700 locations along the approximately 480 miles of sidewalk located within the City. A 3" or higher elevation difference poses the greatest risk of a trip and fall incident. The Council followed up on this information by appropriating funding into the 2014 budget for the Sidewalk Repair Program. The Sidewalk Repair Program began with a two person crew: one Heavy Equipment Operator (HEO) and one Utility Maintenance Worker (UMW). In evaluating the first year of the program, it was determined that greater efficiency and effectiveness could be attained using two HEOs and the Council authorized the staffing change in the 2015 budget. After two construction seasons, much has been accomplished. The attached map illustrates repairs to date totaling approximately 160 locations. The crew has repaired and replaced over 372 panels (each panel is typically 5' x 5', and can be as large as 10' x 10'). The work is very involved and requires multiple mobilizations, traffic control and excavation prior to replacement of the concrete. To date, approximately 3,165 crew hours have been devoted to the Sidewalk Repair Program at a cost far less than if the sidewalk maintenance were to be outsourced to a contractor. Based on a preliminary cost estimate, to date, efforts on the sidewalk repair have totaled almost $380,000 in cost saving verses contracting the work out. The total estimated cost with a contractor for 372 panels would be approximately $558,000, as compared to actual program costs of approximately $180,000. The area of repair includes the following general locations: 1. Various locations north of I-182, east of Road 68 and west of Road 36. 2. North of Sylvester Avenue, west of SR 395 and south I-182. 3. East of the railroad, south of I-182 and north of 'A' Street. 4. North of 'A' Street, east of Oregon Avenue and west of US 12 (all of the identified locations in this region are complete). The existing street trees are a major consideration in addressing uplifted sidewalks in the downtown area. The subject trees are mature and provide important aesthetic value to the downtown area. Given their size and maturity, many of the downtown trees are in close proximity to underground utilities, which complicates removal in a way that can quickly turn a small project into a large one, and disrupt surrounding businesses. Public Works is coordinating with Parks and Facilities to develop a program to retain or replace trees as appropriate. Input through the City's recent outreach efforts in the downtown area supports the notion that mature trees in the downtown core are of high value to the citizenry. Page 4 of 24 Another factor to consider for downtown is how much? The City is actively working on mid-term and long-term plans and strategies that will include new sidewalks throughout much of the downtown business district. At the same time temporary sidewalk repairs are needed throughout the area. A number of downtown sidewalk locations have been addressed on Lewis Street from 5th Avenue to 7th Avenue. With a solid strategy in place with respect to the street trees, the crew's major focus for 2016 will be the entire area of Columbia Street, Lewis Street, and Clark Street from 1st Avenue to 5th Avenue. We will continue to communicate with downtown stakeholders and residents to inform them that some of the repairs in the downtown area will be temporary, as the area is under design for reconstruction within the next few years. In order to avoid removing relatively new sidewalk the focus will be on addressing failed sidewalk sections, with the primary goal being to smooth the way for pedestrians. In certain areas there may be some asphalt, particularly around some of the mature street trees. Some of the existing trees may need to be removed prior to the sidewalk work. Staff will identify the trees that will be removed and that information will be shared with the stakeholders. During the months leading up to construction season, the crew will concentrate on excavating uplifted sections of sidewalk and will place gravel down until the weather permits placing concrete or asphalt for the repair. It is anticipated that the majority of the sidewalk concerns in the central business district will be addressed by early summer of this year. Schedule and conditions allowing, upon completion of the work in the downtown core, the focus will shift to completing the other areas in Zone A and a substantial amount in Zone B. The focus in 2017 will be to complete Zone B and concentrate on Zones C and D. V. DISCUSSION: Page 5 of 24 0 N P AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council December 22, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/11/16 FROM: Rick Terway, Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Amend PMC 8.02 Animal Control - Refusal to Redeem I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Currently, failure to redeem an animal is a criminal misdemeanor and generally a lengthy process to adjudicate. The cost in staff and court time is more of a burden than the offence dictates, for the Animal Control Authority, the court and the offender. V. DISCUSSION: In an effort to maintain parity with the other ACA cities (Kennewick and Richland), staff recommends reducing this offence from a criminal misdemeanor to a civil infraction. This reduces the first two offences to a civil infraction, however the third violation within the specified time would be considered a criminal misdemeanor. Page 8 of 24 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington Amending PMC 8.02.130 "Interference with Officers - Failure to Redeem - Frauds"; Creating a new Section PMC 8.02.135 "Refusal to Redeem"; and Amending PMC 8.02.360 "Penalty Provisions" WHEREAS, it has been determined that appropriate penalties applicable to an owner who failed to redeem an animal as opposed to an individual who interferes with an animal control officer should result in different penalties; and WHEREAS, to implement that more appropriate application of the penalty to the offense, it is necessary to amend those portions of the City's animal code. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 8.02.130 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled "Interference with Officers - Failure to Redeem - Frauds" shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 8.02.130 INTERFERENCE WITH OFFICERS FAILURE O REDEEM FRAUDS. 1) It is unlawful for any unauthorized person to break open, or attempt to break open, the City animal control shelter, or to take or let out animals there from, or to take or attempt to take from any officer any animal seized by him in compliance with this chapter, or in any manner interfere with or hinder such an officer in the discharge of his duties under this chapter. 32) Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. (Ord. 3326 Sec. 1, 1998.) Section 2. That a new Section 8.02.135 of the Pasco Municipal Code entitled "Refusal to Redeem" shall be and hereby is adopted and shall read as follows: 8.02.135 REFUSAL TO REDEEM. 1) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly refuse to redeem an impounded animal or to obtain an animal from the poundmaster or return it to an owner without first paying all impound fees. Violation of this section shall be guilty of an infraction. Page 9 of 24 2) Repeated failure to redeem. Any person who knowingly refuses to redeem an impounded animal or to obtain an animal from the poundmaster or return it to an owner without first paying all impound fees, more than two (2) times within a 24 -month period, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Section 3. That Section 8.02.360 entitled "Penalty Provisions" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows: 8.02.360 PENALITY PROVISIONS. 1) Any person violating any provision of this chapter, except Sections 8.02.130, 8.02.135 (2), 8.02.170 and 8.02.320, is guilty of an infraction. Unless matters in aggravation warrant a greater civil penalty, each violation shall be subject to a minimum penalty as set forth in Chapter 3.07 of this Code, plus all costs and assessments for the following respective violations: a) First violation within five years. b) Second violation within five years. C) Third violation within five years. d) Four or more violations within five years. 2) Each person is guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of the provisions of this chapter is committed, continued or permitted by any such person and shall be punished accordingly. 3) Court costs shall be assessed in addition to any other fine, penalty, cost or statutory assessment imposed. 4) The City, at its eleetion, may diveft any infraefien, identified in subseetie" above, to be heard before the Pasee Code Enforeement Board pur-stiant to ehapter- 11.04 of Paseo Mttnieipal Code. Assessmei4s of monetar-y penalties for- violations of this Chapter- shall be assessed by the Code Enfor-eement Board, in aeeor-danee with subseetion 1), a) through d) • (Ord. 3870, 2008; Ord. 3544 Sec. 1, 2002; Ord. 3534 Sec. 1, 2002; Ord. 3326 Sec. 1, 1998.) Section 4. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage, and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this day of , 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 10 of 24 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 5, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/11/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Repeal PMC Chapter 3.88 "Demands" I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Chapter 3.88 "Demands" in the Pasco Municipal Code was adopted many decades ago to set out a procedure for the processing and decisions on claims against the City. The City has more current procedures in place whether claims (demands) are presented in the form of requests for payment of goods and services, or claims for compensation due to action (or inaction) of the City. Claims for payment are handled pursuant to City Council Resolution No. 3524 (adopted December 2013) and in accordance with RCW 42.24. Claims for damages, or tort claims, are processed pursuant to Administrative Order No. 352, and in accordance with our membership agreement with Washington Cities Insurance Authority (WCIA), the City's Risk Pool. V. DISCUSSION: Following review of the Chapter, and with concurrence of the City Attorney, staff recommends that Chapter 3.88 be repealed in its entirety as more current and comprehensive policies are in place and the procedures no longer apply. Page 11 of 24 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington repealing in its entirety Chapter 3.88 "Demands" of the Pasco Municipal Code. WHEREAS, Chapter 3.88 "Demands" of the Pasco Municipal Code is no longer applicable to the way that the City processes "demands"; and WHERAS, the City has adequate procedures in place for the processing of demands or claims for payment for goods or services and the City also has a process for the processing of demands on claims for damages against the City; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 3.88 "Demands" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety. Section 2. If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word of this ordinance is declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, it shall be severed, and such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 19th day of January 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 12 of 24 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 7, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/11/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Charter Cable Franchise Extension I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City has been preparing for and conducting negotiations with Charter for renewal of the franchise agreement for the last 52 months. While a transfer agreement request from Comcast to assume the franchise agreement from Charter in the fall of 2014 (which was subsequently abandoned by Comcast) temporarily put negotiations on hold and, since that time, Charter and Time Warner Cable have a deal in the works, which is still pending, but which would leave Charter as the City's franchisee, we have continued negotiations in earnest over the last 3-4 months. While staff have been disappointed at the pace of negotiations (and recognizing that Council has grown equally weary of the need to continue to renew the existing franchise), there is currently cause for optimism that the renewal process can be concluded within the proposed extension. Over the past several months we have been able to shift negotiations to the level of Charter corporate representatives with the Cities' (Richland and Pasco) consultant playing a key role in negotiations. Staff is pleased to report that the number of "open" issues has been reduced to less than half of the issues that were in play just three months ago. While the process is slow, given the federal restrictions and limited alternative providers, staff believes that continuing on the current course is the City's only viable alternative. As the current franchise is set to expire February 1, 2016, more time will be needed to Page 13 of 24 complete the renewal process. Staff proposes an extension to July 31, 2016 to complete a renewal franchise agreement with Charter. Charter has agreed to the extension. V. DISCUSSION: Under the proposed ordinance, Charter must provide its formal acceptance of the extension within 12 days of passage by the City. Page 14 of 24 ORDINANCE NO. An ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, Extending the Cable Television Franchise Agreement with Falcon Video Communications, L.P., locally known as Charter Communications, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Grantee" through July 31, 2016. WHEREAS, cable providers are required to hold a franchise agreement with the City of Pasco ("City") to use the City's public right-of-way to provide cable services; and WHEREAS, the current cable franchise agreement was entered into pursuant to Ordinance No. 3304 ("Cable Franchise") on June 20, 1998; and WHEREAS, control of Grantee was subsequently transferred from Falcon Communications, L.P., to Charter Communications Holding Company, L.L.C., pursuant to Resolution No. 2468; and WHEREAS, the Cable Franchise is due to expire on February 1, 2016 pursuant to Ordinance No. 4240; and WHEREAS, Grantee and the City have been engaged in informal renewal negotiations in accordance with Section 626(h) of Title VI of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the "Cable Act"); and WHEREAS, the City has been conducting franchise renewal ascertainment in accordance with Section 626(a)(1) of the Cable Act; and WHEREAS, the parties continue to reserve all rights under the formal procedures of Section 626 of the Cable Act, and do not waive any rights related thereto; and WHEREAS, Grantee has filed timely notice of intent to renew its Franchise Agreement with City pursuant to Section 626 of the Cable Act; and WHEREAS, the City is willing to grant an extension of the current Franchise until July 31, 2016, to give the parties additional time to complete the renewal process; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Extension of the Term of the Franchise Agreement through July 31, 2016. The Cable Franchise, as amended, is hereby extended, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below, until July 31, 2016 or until a new franchise agreement is agreed to by the parties and enacted by the City. Section 2. Terms and Conditions of Extension of the Franchise Agreement. The City's consent to the extension, described above, is subject to, and conditioned upon, the following terms and conditions: Page 15 of 24 A. All terms and conditions of the existing Franchise Agreement shall remain in full force and effect during the extension period. B. The extension shall have no adverse effect on Grantee's compliance, nor shall the extension be grounds for any change or modification in the remaining terms, conditions and obligations of the Franchise Agreement. C. The City and Grantee's agreement to extend the Franchise Agreement, as set forth herein, shall not be construed, in any manner whatsoever, to constitute a waiver or release of any rights that the City or the Grantee may have under the Franchise Agreement. D. Both parties hereby reserve all rights under applicable provisions of the Cable Act, including, without limitation, Sections 626 and 635 of the Cable Act. Nothing herein shall be deemed or construed as a waiver, release or surrender of any right that either party may have under the Cable Act or any applicable law. E. Within twelve (12) days after passage of this Ordinance by the City Council, Grantee shall file with the City Clerk its written acceptance of this Ordinance, substantially in the form of Exhibit A, attached hereto. Section 3. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this day of , 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form: Debbie Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 16 of 24 EXHIBIT "A" Acceptance of Ordinance No. TO: City of Pasco, Washington Attention: Dave Zabell, City Manager Pasco City Hall P.O. Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 This is to advise the City of Pasco that Falcon Video Communications, L.P. (the "Grantee"), hereby unqualifiedly accepts Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council on , 2016, regarding the extension of the Franchise Agreement between Grantee and the City. FALCON VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, L.P. ("Grantee") ME Name: Mark Brown Title: V.P., Government Affairs Date: Page 17 of 24 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 7, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/11/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Road 48 Fire Station - Alternative Development Concepts I. REFERENCE(S): Property Photo Scope of Work for Consultant II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Information for Council III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City acquired title to the Road 48 Fire Station from Franklin County Fire District No. 3 as part of the asset transfer associated with the Road 84 annexation, last year. In order to determine the ultimate level of improvements to the facility, and the part that the facility will play in the organization and delivery of fire and ambulance services, staff proposes to contract with TCA, a firm which specializes in the design and construction of fire and other public safety facilities, to prepare two alternative development plans for two different property configurations. Development plans will include a minimum size fire station with three apparatus bays and sufficient living quarters while the alternate plan will consider the additional impact of developing needed administrative offices for the department. Land scenarios will consider the existing land ownership (NW corner of Road 48 and Octave) of 22,200 sq ft for one scenario, with the addition of the property to the west (currently a single family dwelling), comprising an additional 17,000 sq ft, as the second alternative. Staff believes that Council will be in the best position to make a decision on the extent of development for the Road 48 Fire Station, upon completion of the above analysis by TCA. Page 18 of 24 V. DISCUSSION: Upon completion of the consultant's analysis, expected to be in mid-February, staff will report back to Council with a review of the pros and cons, plus approximate costs associated with each alternative. Page 19 of 24 lJ) j� /_ �.tf L / '• — . bra - � - _ •..,,may _ �.�� .�• �4,,�M • �.. 'r, _ - y t` 7,�+ .) .. Ttj v 1a. w •.1 � ' - a � F 4ti�. �1i - IL r mob, • Apm 771 " k tr � • R COT, v I CITY OF PASCO T © A Road 48 Fire Station (Station 84) Exhibit B archk eci�re • ,�ianr lra9 PHASE 1 TASK 1 Conceptual Design Concept Minimum Station Configuration General Station Criteria Options Minimum Station Configuration Three Bay apparatus capacity (including BC vehicle) Living quarters for 5 firefighters plus BC Minimum Station Plus Administration Three Bay apparatus capacity (including BC vehicle) Living quarters for 5 firefighters plus BC Administrative offices for 6 FTE Services in this phase include: Services to prepare two alternate conceptual design concepts for a minimum station configuration and station plus administrative configuration on the current property and current property plus the addition of neighboring property on the west side. • Develop space needs assessment including square foot summary by space, defined operational criteria with individual component diagrams for two station sizes noted in station criteria options Develop two conceptual plans ( with phasing as required) on existing site for minimum and plus admin programs. • Develop two conceptual plans ( with phasing as required) on expanded site for minimum and plus admin programs. • Develop one cost estimates for each of the four conceptual plans. (4 total estimates) • Present concepts to city council with pros and cons including recommendations • Develop overall project budget for preferred plan including hard and soft costs • Provide project administration (project management, meetings, consultant coordination, client Page 21 of 24 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 5, 2016 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting: 1/11/16 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: City Council Representation on Boards and Committees I. REFERENCE(S): Resolution Current (2014-2015) List of Board and Committee Assignments II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: City Council representation is required on a number of municipal and regional boards and committees. The practice of the City Council has been to make Council appointments to the various boards and committees on a biennial basis; thus, appointments generally are for a two-year period. Changes to these appointments, if necessary, can be made at any time by action of the Mayor and City Council. V. DISCUSSION: The attached list represents current board and committee assignments. Staff recommends that Council consider the list at the meeting of January 11, with the Mayor providing direction on any proposed changes prior to the meeting of January 19. Page 22 of 24 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION confirming Mayoral appointments of Councilmembers to various Boards and Committees for the years 2016-2017. WHEREAS, various boards and committees, serving both regional and local purposes, require representation by the Pasco City Council; and WHEREAS, PMC 2.06.020 reserves authority to the Mayor for appointment of members to advisory committees subject to confirmation of the City Council; and WHEREAS, Mayor Watkins, after consultation with Councilmembers, has declared appointments to the respective boards and committees reflected in the list attached hereto; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Pasco City Council hereby confirms the appointments to the respective boards and committees reflected in the list attached hereto, until otherwise modified by action of the Mayor and City Council. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 19th day of January 2016. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 23 of 24 v CD N O N CITY COUNCIL BOARD AND COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS CALENDAR YEARS — 2014-2015 Mayoral Appointments to Board and Committee Membership CITY OF ` PASCO BOARD/COM LOCATION REPRESENTATIVE ALTERNATE Emergency Medical Services 1St Monday, Bi -Monthly 1:30 pm TRIOS Tom Larsen Al Yenney Franklin County Mosquito Control District 1St Wednesday 12:00 pm 2601 N. Capitol Avenue Bob Hoffmann Al Yenney Parks & Recreation Advisory Council * 1St Thursday 5:30 pm Parks & Rea Classroom Saul Martinez Mike Garrison Old Fire Pension Board 2nd Monday, Quarterly 6:00 pm Conference Room #1 Rebecca Francik Saul Martinez Tri -Cities Regional PFD Board 2nd Wednesday 5:45 pm Varies Matt Watkins, Rebecca Francik, Saul Martinez BFCG Tri -Mats Policy Advisory Committee 2nd Thursday 7:00 am Varies Bob Hoffmann Rebecca Francik Ben -Franklin Transit Board 2nd Thursday 7:00 pm Transit Facility Matt Watkins Mike Garrison Reserve Officers Board 3rd Monday, as needed 5:30 pm Conference Room 41 Matt Watkins and Rebecca Francik LEOFF Disability Board 3rd Monday 6:00 pm Conference Room 41 Matt Watkins and Rebecca Francik TRAC Advisory Board * 3rd Tuesday 5:00 pm TRAC Facility Matt Watkins and Al Yenney Good Roads & Transportation Association * 3rd Wednesday, Bi -Monthly 5:30 pm Varies Bob Hoffmann Rebecca Francik Franklin County Emergency Management Council 3rd Thursday, Quarterly 3:30 pm Emergency Management Office Matt Watkins Tom Larsen Benton Franklin Council of Governments 3rd Friday 11:30 am Varies Al Yenney Rebecca Francik Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund 4th Monday 4:00 pm Ben -Franklin Transit Al Yenney Saul Martinez Visit Tri -Cities Board 4th Wednesday 7:30 am 7130 W. Grandridge Mike Garrison Tom Larsen TRIDEC Board of Directors 4th Thursday 4:00 pm 7130 W. Grandridge Mike Garrison Tom Larsen Hanford Communities Governing Board (and ECA) 4d' Friday, Quarterly 7:30 am Richland Council Chambers Mike Garrison Al Yenney Franklin County Solid Waste Advisory Committee As called Franklin County Public Works Mike Garrison Tom Larsen Saul Martinez Matt Watkins BFCG Solid Waste Advisory Committee As called TBD Mike Garrison Tom Larsen Franklin County Law & Justice Council * As called Franklin County Courthouse Bob Hoffmann Mike Garrison Manhattan Project Historical Park As called TBD Matt Watkins Local Housing Trust Fund Oversight Committee * As called 710 W. Court Street Rebecca Francik, Mike Garrison, Saul Martinez *Voluntary (does not require elected official as representative) 2015