Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015.11.02 Council Meeting PacketPage 4-7 mm 10-19 20-22 Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER: 2. ROLL CALL: AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL 7:00 p.m. (a) Pledge of Allegiance November 2, 2015 3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Council members or the public, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately. (a) Approval of Minutes To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated October 19, 2015 (b) Bills and Communications To approve claims in the total amount of $2,657,511.90 ($1,203,822.58 in Check Nos. 206485-206787; $812,364.69 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 807614 -807730;807734 -807735;807743-807765;807767-807908;807910- 808064; $46,909.38 in Check Nos. 48703-48742; $590,019.25 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30087141-30087627; $4,396.00 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 189-190). (c) Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with City of Mesa for Municipal Court Services To approve Amendment No. 1 to the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mesa for Municipal Court Services and, further, authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment. (d) Design and Construction Management Services Agreement for City Hall Remodel Project To approve the Professional Services Agreement with CKJT Architects for the City Hall Remodel Project and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. Page 1 of 100 23 -31 32-37 38-63 Me Regular Meeting November 2, 2015 (e) Interlocal Agreement for Automatic Aid Response To approve the Interlocal Agreement for automatic aid response and, further, authorize the City Manger to execute the agreement. (RC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: 5. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: This item is provided to allow citizens the opportunity to bring items to the attention of the City Council or to express an opinion on an issue. Its purpose is not to provide a venue for debate or for the posing of questions with the expectation of an immediate response. Some questions require consideration by Council over time and after a deliberative process with input from a number of different sources; some questions are best directed to staff members who have access to specific information. Citizen comments will normally be limited to three minutes each by the Mayor. Those with lengthy messages are invited to summarize their comments and/or submit written information for consideration by the Council outside of formal meetings. 6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: (a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers 7. HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO: (a) j Easement Vacation: Easement in the Plat of Agri -Center (MF# VAC 2015-014) CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4242, an ordinance vacating the east/west easement between Lots -8-15 Plat of Agri -Center and, further, authorize publication by summary only. 8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: (a) 0 Preliminary Plat: Road 84 Estates (MF # PP 2015-004) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3665, a resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Road 84 Estates. (b) J= Preliminary Plat: Sunrise Estates Division II (MF# PP 2015-002) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3666, approving a Preliminary Plat for Sunrise Estates Division II. Page 2 of 100 Regular Meeting November 2, 2015 82-100 (c) Q* Special Permit: Location of a Church in a C-3 District (MF# SP 2015-010) MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 3667, a resolution granting a special permit for a church in a C-3 (General Business) Zone at 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite D, as recommended by the Planning Commission. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: 10. NEW BUSINESS: 11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: I[d�1:1\ 1a111 (RC) Roll Call Vote Required * Item not previously discussed Q Quasi -Judicial Matter MF# "Master File #...." REMINDERS: 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, November 4, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue — Franklin County Mosquito Control District Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.) 5:30 p.m., Thursday, November 5, P&R Classroom — Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER SAUL MARTINEZ, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.) This meeting is broadcast live on PSC -TV Channel 191 on Charter Cable and streamed at www.pasco-wa.gov/psctvlive. Audio equipment available for the hearing impaired; contact the Clerk for assistance. Page 3 of 100 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 22, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 Rick Terway, Director Administrative & Community Services FROM: Sandy Kenworthy, Administrative Assistant II Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes I. REFERENCE(S): Minutes of the October 19, 2015 meeting II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated October 19, 2015 III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 4 of 100 REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 2015 The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Rebecca Francik, Mike Garrison, Robert Hoffinann, Tom Larsen, Saul Martinez, Matt Watkins and Al Yenney. Staff present: Dave Zabell, City Manager; Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager; Leland Kerr, City Attorney; Richard Terway, Administrative & Community Services Director; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director; Ken Roske, Police Captain and Dave Hare, Battalion Fire Chief. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Sergeant Madison Waldo and members of Tri -City Young Marines. CONSENT AGENDA: Approval of Minutes To approve the Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated October 5, 2015. Bills and Communications To approve claims in the total amount of $2,081,328.29 ($988,020.24 in Check Nos. 206273-206484; $421,626.08 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 807226-807342; 807355-807448; 807451-807466; 807475-807575; 807580-807613; 807732- 807733; 807736-807739; $45,478.06 in Check Nos. 48664-48702; $611,125.77 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30086653-30087140; $15,078.14 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 183-188). To approve bad debt write-off for Utility Billing, Ambulance, Cemetery, General Accounts, Miscellaneous Accounts, and Municipal Court (non- criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of $292,468.89 and, of that amount, authorize $167,714.64 be turned over for collection. Tourism Promotion Area To approve the 2016 Marketing Plan and Operating Budget for the Tourism Promotion Area in the total amount of $1,175,000. To approve the 2016 Special Project Expenditure for the Tourism Promotion Area in the amount of $20,000 to be funded from the TPA Reserve Balance. Final Plat: Replat of a Portion of A.M. Wehe's Whitehouse Addition (MF # FP -2015-004) To approve the final plat for the replat of Block 3 and portions of Block 2, A.M. Wehe's Whitehouse Addition to Pasco. Page 1 of 3 Page 5 of 100 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 2015 Civil Service Commission Appointment To confirm the City Manager's appointment of Angel Esquivel to the Civil Service Commission to fill the unexpired term of Position No. 2, term to expire 2/17/16. Street Vacation: A Portion of Irving Street (MF # VAC 2015-016) To approve Resolution No. 3662, setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 16, 2015, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider the vacation of that portion of West Irving Street located east of Road 27. Street Vacation: A Portion of W. Margaret St. (MF# VAC 2015-017) To approve Resolution No. 3663, setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 16, 2015, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating West Margaret Street between Road 45 and Road 46. Street Vacation: A Portion of N Main and a Portion of Cincinnati (MF # VAC 2015-015) To approve Resolution No. 3664, a resolution setting 7:00 P.M., Monday, November 16, 2015, as the time and date for a public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion of North Main Avenue and Cincinnati Street in the Freys Addition. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve the Consent Agenda as read. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Red Ribbon Week Proclamation Presentation Mayor Watkins presented a Proclamation to Young Marine Representatives, Sergeant Madison Waldo, Corporal Hunter Beseth and Corporal Alexandra Ashley proclaiming October 23-31, 2015 "Red Ribbon Week." REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: Mr. Martinez attended the Sun Willows Home Owners Association meeting. Mr. Yenney attended the Benton Franklin Council of Governments meeting. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO HEARINGS: Arterial Corridors Commercial Design Standards (MF# CA 2015-003) Council and staff discussed the details of the proposed ordinance. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4241, an ordinance creating PMC Chapter 25.59 dealing with Commercial Corridors Design Standards on select parcels in the "O" and C-1 Zoning Districts and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: Yes - Watkins, Hoffmann, Francik, Garrison, Martinez. No - Yenney, Larsen. Page 2 of 3 Page 6 of 100 REGULAR MEETING NEW BUSINESS: MINUTES PASCO CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 19, 2015 Multi -Agency Three Rivers Information & Communication Services (MATRICS) Interlocal Agreement Mr. Zabell explained the details of the proposed agreement. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve the Interlocal Agreement for the creation of the Multi -Agency Three Rivers Information & Communication Services (MATRICS) with the cities of Kennewick and Richland, and Benton and Franklin Counties and, further, authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. Mr. Yenney seconded. Motion carried unanimously. National Citizen's Survey Council and staff discussed possible questions to include in the survey. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to include the questions relating to district based voting and safety cameras on the survey. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried. MOTION: Mr. Yenney moved to include the question relating to recycling on the survey. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: Yes - Martinez, Watkins, Yenney, Francik, Garrison. No - Hoffmann, Larsen. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Council adjourned to Executive Session at 7:42 p.m. for approximately 15 minutes to discuss enforcement action and litigation or potential litigation with the City Manager, Deputy City Manager and the City Attorney. Mayor Watkins called the meeting back to order at 7:58 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:58 p.m. APPROVED: Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Debra Clark, City Clerk PASSED and APPROVED this 2nd day of November, 2015 Page 3 of 3 Page 7 of 100 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 22, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 Rick Terway, Director Administrative & Community Services FROM: Eva Lindgren, Deputy Director Administrative & Community Services SUBJECT: Bills and Communications I. REFERENCE(S): Accounts Payable 11.02.15 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve claims in the total amount of $2,657,511.90 ($1,203,822.58 in Check Nos. 206485-206787; $812,364.69 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 807614-807730; 807734- 807735; 807743-807765; 807767-807908; 807910-808064; $46,909.38 in Check Nos. 48703-48742; $590,019.25 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 30087141-30087627; $4,396.00 in Electronic Transfer Nos. 189-190). III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: V. DISCUSSION: Page 8 of 100 CITY OF PASCO Council Meeting of: November 2, 2015 Accounts Payable Approved The City Council City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington We, the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation against the city and that we are authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick Terway, A&CS Director We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, do hereby certify on this 2 day of November, 2015 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received and are approved for payment: Claims Bank Payroll Bank Gen9 Bank Electronic Bank Combined Check Numbers 206485-206787 48703-48742 Total Check Amount $1,203,822.58 $46,909.38 Total Checks $ 1,250,731.96 Electronic Transfer Numbers 807614-807730 30087141-30087627 159-190 807734-807735 807743-807765 807767-807908 807910-808064 Total EFT Amount $812,364.69 $590,019.25 $4,396.00 Total EFTs $ 1,406,779.94 Grand Total $ 2,657,511.90 Councilmember Councilmember SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERAL FUND 537,150.58 STREET 66,165.32 ARTERIAL STREET 0.00 STREET OVERLAY 0.00 C. D. BLOCK GRANT 4,647.47 HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT 10,000.00 NSP GRANT 52.13 KING COMMUNITY CENTER 2,611.69 AMBULANCE SERVICE 36,157.38 CEMETERY 2,063.67 ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 2,507.44 GOLF COURSE 27,365.40 SENIOR CENTER OPERATING 5,404.68 MULTI MODAL FACILITY 2,725.06 RIVERSHORE TRAIL & MARINA MAIN 602.23 SPECIAL ASSESSMNT LODGING 0.00 LITTER CONTROL 1,259.20 REVOLVING ABATEMENT 2,123.50 TRAC DEVELOPMENT & OPERATING 0.00 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 61,447.66 STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER 10,422.92 GENERAL CAP PROJ CONSTRUCTION 8,728.45 WATER/SEWER 508,576.85 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL 27,595.01 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - OPERATING BUSINESS 13,863.31 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL 0.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL - REPLACEMENT BUSINESS 0.00 MEDICAUDENTAL INSURANCE 398,548.23 FLEX 307.24 PAYROLL CLEARING 927,186.48 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 2,657,511.90 Page 9 of 100 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 27, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with City of Mesa for Municipal Court Services I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Amendment Original Interlocal Agreement H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Amendment No. 1 to the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Mesa for Municipal Court Services and, further, authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: In early 2013, the City entered into an interlocal agreement with the City of Mesa for Municipal Court Services. The agreement provides that Mesa will be able to use Pasco Municipal Court for the processing of citations written by Mesa officers. The agreement provides a fixed fee, payable to Pasco for each case and for the payment of actual costs for such things as jury panels. The original agreement was written for a two-year term, in order to give both parties the opportunity to evaluate the agreement before making longer commitments. The proposed amendment will change the agreement to provide for automatic two-year renewal terms unless either party provides notice of non -renewal 120 days prior to the end of the term. The Municipal Court Administrator indicates no issues with the implementation of the agreement and that there is very little activity from Mesa. In the event the City needs to adjust the fees and costs, such can be done prior to renewal of any term. Page 10 of 100 V. DISCUSSION: This item was discussed at the October 26 Council workshop meeting. As the agreement appears to work well for both parties, staff recommends approval of the amendment. Page 11 of 100 Amendment No. 1 to Interlocal Agreement between the City of Mesa and the City of Pasco for Municipal Court Services and Facilities WHEREAS, the City of Mesa and the City of Pasco, each a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington, entered into an Interlocal Agreement for Municipal Court Services and Facilities, effective February 1, 2013; and WHEREAS, the Cities desire to amend the Agreement to continue on an ongoing basis, unless terminated by either party, following notice; and WHEREAS, the Cities desire to formalize the Amendment; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth in the original Agreement and this Amendment thereto, and in exercise of the authority granted by the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW, the City of Mesa and the City of Pasco do hereby agree to amend the Interlocal Agreement to read as follows: 20. Duration and Termination. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of two (2) years, (initial term 2/1/13-1/31/15) which shall be automatically renewed for successive two (2) year terms unless either party provides written notice of non -renewal to the other party at least 120 days prior to the end of the current term. Either party may elect to terminate the Agreement by written notice of termination to the other party. Said termination shall become effective 180 days from the date of receipt of said written notice. This Amendment shall become effective upon approval and execution by both parties and by the posting of the Amendment to the Agreement on the website of either of the Cities party hereto. Dated this day of , 2015. CITY OF PASCOCl/ TY OF MESA .� Matt Watkins, Mayor David Ferguson, Mayo ATTEST Debbie Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Lee Kerr, Attorney TTESI eresa Stan ridge, City derk APPROVED AS TO FORM Lee Kerr, Attorney Page 12 of 100 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MESA AND THE CITY OF PASCO FOR MUNICIPAL COURT SERVICES AND FACILITIES WHEREAS, the City of Mesa (hereafter "Mesa") is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco (hereafter "Pasco") is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington; and WHEREAS, each of the parties to this Agreement is authorized under Washington law to operate a municipal court (Chapter 3.50 RCW); and WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34 RCW ("The Interlocal Cooperation Act") permits municipal corporations to contract with one another to perform any act that each is independently authorized to perform; and WHEREAS, RCW 39.34.180 and 3.50.805 authorize municipal corporations to enter into interlocal agreements for municipal court services; and WHEREAS, Pasco currently operates a municipal court, and WHEREAS, Pasco is willing to provide these municipal court services to Mesa; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration for the mutual covenants and promises set forth in this Agreement, and in the exercise of authority granted by the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW, Mesa and Pasco do hereby agree to the following: L Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide municipal court services to Mesa. 2. Administration. The following individuals are designated as representatives of the respective parties. The representatives shall be responsible for administration of this Agreement and for coordinating and monitoring performance under this Agreement. In the event such representatives are changed, the party making the change shall notify the other party. The City of Pasco's representative shall be Dot French, Court Administrator. City of Mesa's representative shall be Teresa Standridge, City Clerk. No joint acquisition of real or personal property is contemplated hereunder. Mesa agrees that court operations under this Agreement will be as provided for by Pasco Municipal Code Chapter 2.14. 3. Duties of Pasco. Pasco shall perform the following duties: (a) Provide all municipal court services for Mesa. For the purpose of this Page 13 of 100 Agreement, "Municipal Court Services" shall include all local court services currently provided by Pasco Municipal Court including, filing, processing, adjudication, and penalty enforcement of all Mesa cases filed, or to be filed, by Mesa in Pasco Municipal Court. This includes, but is not limited to, issuance of search and arrest warrants, issuance of subpoenas for non -criminal traffic citations to an officer or radar expert on behalf of a defendant when a timely and written request is submitted in conformance with IRLJ 3.1 (a) and local court rules, setting of motions and evidentiary hearings, pre -trials, bench trials, jury trials, sentencing, reviews, post -trial motions and provide court security. Pasco shall provide all necessary court services personnel, equipment and facilities to perform the foregoing described Municipal Court Services in a timely manner as required by law and court rule. (b) Provide facilities, materials, and support staff of the municipal judge and pro tem judge(s). (c) Compensate the municipal judge and pro tem judge(s), as per the terms of this Agreement. (d) Accept all misdemeanor criminal and infraction flings and timely process and adjudicate the same. (e) Remit all revenues due to Mesa pursuant to this agreement. (f) Provide collection services to collect court -mandated costs and assessments. (g) Provide monitoring of court ordered probation. (Pasco shall retain revenue associated with assigned probation cases). (h) Provide for necessary language interpretation services. (i) Provide Prosecution and Public Defense services, as needed. 4. Duties of Mesa. Mesa shall perform the following duties: (a) Filing of Tickets. Criminal citations and infractions issued by Mesa shall be filed with the Pasco Court within 2 business days after the violation or ticket issuance. If a person is booked into jail, Franklin County Sheriff must fax the police report to the Pasco Municipal Court no later than 8:00 AM the next day. (b) Warrants. Whenever Mesa executes a warrant, Mesa shall contact the Pasco Municipal Court and make a return on the warrant as soon as possible. (c) Jail Costs. Mesa is responsible for incarceration arrangements for its defendants and the cost for such incarceration. (d) Appeals. In the event that Mesa files an appeal, Mesa shall be responsible for all costs and fees necessary to effect and prosecute said appeal. 5. Mesa Municipal Court Created. Mesa is creating a municipal court. This court is being established for statutory purposes only. Mesa hereby designates the Pasco Municipal Court to operate as the municipal court for Mesa. A case filed in Pasco Municipal Court will continue to be identified as a case filed by Mesa. (a) Municipal Judge. The Mayor of Mesa shall appoint a Municipal Judge to preside over its respective municipal court. Mesa agrees to appoint the current Pasco Municipal Judge to this position. The appointed Municipal Judge shall be qualified in accordance with state law, including holding a law degree and being admitted to practice law under the laws of the State of Washington. Interlocal Agreement between City of Mesa and City of Pasco for Municipal Court Services Page 2 Page 14 of 100 (b) Court Administrator. Mesa shall appoint a Court Administrator to supervise the municipal court. Mesa agrees to appoint the current Pasco Court Administrator to this position. The appointed Court Administrator shall be qualified in accordance with City of Pasco Municipal Court current job description. (c) Salary. Mesa shall provide that the Judge and Court Administrator shall be compensated as established by the City of Pasco. 6. Cost of Contract and Payments. Mesa shall pay Pasco for providing municipal court/ hearing services on a per case basis as follows; (a) For each criminal citation filed- $300. (b) For each traffic, parking, or non -traffic infraction filed- $50. (c) For each case which requires assignment of the City Prosecutor- $100; Jury trial- $400. (d) For each case which requires assignment of a public defender- $170; Jury trial- $440. (e) Actual costs for each jury panel. (f) For each case which requires assignment of arraignment counsel- $60. Hearing services for vehicle impounds and dangerous dogs will be provided at $80/hr. Services will be scheduled through the Pasco City Clerk, by Mesa, as needed. These fees shall be paid regardless of whether the cases are later dismissed without a frill adjudication. Pasco shall bill Mesa on a monthly basis for amounts due under this Agreement. Mesa shall pay the amount due within 45 days of receipt. However, if Mesa has a good faith dispute with the amount of the invoice, Mesa shall pay the non -disputed amount within the time frame set forth in this section. 7. Compensation for Court Costs. Pursuant to RCW 3.62.070 and RCW 39,24.180, Pasco shall remit to Mesa Local Court Revenues as distributed by the Judicial Information System (JIS) database, for Mesa cases, at the end of each month. Mesa shall be responsible to remit all monies due and owed to the State of Washington in connection with Mesa's cases. In entering into this Agreement for Municipal Court Services, Mesa and Pasco have considered, pursuant to RCW 39.34.180, the anticipated costs of services, anticipated and potential revenues to fund the services, including fines and fees, filing fee recoupment, criminal justice funding, and state sales tax funding. 8. Local Court Revenues Defined. The Local Court Revenues include all fines, forfeited bail, penalties, court cost recoupment and parking ticket payments derived from Mesa cases filed after payment of any and all assessments required by state law thereon. Local Court revenues include all revenues defined above received by the Court as of the effective date of this agreement. Local Court Revenues exclude; restitution or reimbursement to Mesa or a crime victim, or other restitution as may be awarded by a judge. Interlocal Agreement between City of Mesa and City of Pasco for Municipal Court Services Page 3 Page 15 of 100 9. Monthly Reporting and Monthly Payment to City. Pasco shall provide to Mesa a monthly remittance report and a check or wire transfer for Local Court Revenues no later than ten business days after the end of the calendar month. In addition, Pasco will provide to Mesa a monthly report listing Mesa cases filed with Pasco Municipal Court for said month. 10. Indemnification. (a) Mesa Ordinances, Rules and Regulations. In executing this Agreement, Pasco does not assume liability or responsibility for or in any way release Mesa from any liability or responsibility which arises in whole or in part from the existence or effect of Mesa ordinances, rules, or regulations, policies or procedures. If any cause, claim, suit, action or administrative proceeding is commenced in which the enforceability and/or validity of any Mesa ordinance, rule, or regulation is at issue, Mesa shall defend the same at its sole expense and if judgment is entered or damages are awarded against Mesa, Pasco, or both, Mesa shall satisfy the same, including all chargeable costs and attorneys' fees. (b) Mesa Indemnification of Pasco. Mesa shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Pasco, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, including costs and attorneys' fees in defense thereof, for injuries, sickness or death of persons (including employees of Mesa), or damage to property, or the violation of any person's civil rights, which is caused by or arises out of Mesa's acts errors or omissions with respect to the subject matter of this agreement; provided, however; (i) Mesa's obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless shall not extend to injuries, sickness, death, damage or civil rights violations caused by or resulting from the sole actions or negligence of Pasco, its officers, agents or employees; and (ii) Mesa's obligation to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless for injuries, sickness, death, damage or civil rights violations caused by or resulting from the concurrent actions or negligence of Mesa and Pasco shall apply only to the extent that Mesa's actions or negligence caused or contributed thereto. (c) Pasco Indemnification of Mesa. Pasco shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless Mesa, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, including costs and attorneys' fees in defense thereof, for injuries, sickness or death or persons (including employees of Pasco), or damage to property, or the violation of any person's civil rights, which is caused by or arises out of Pasco' acts, errors or omissions with respect to the subject matter of this agreement; provided, however (i) Pasco's obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless shall not extend to injuries, sickness, death, damage or civil rights violations caused by or resulting from the sole actions or negligence of Mesa, its officers, agent or employees; and (ii) Pasco's obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless for Interlocal Agreement between City of Mesa and City of Pasco for Municipal Court Services Page 4 Page 16 of 100 injuries, sickness, death, damage or civil rights violations caused by or resulting from the concurrent actions or negligence of Pasco and Mesa shall apply only to the extent that Pasco's actions or negligence caused or contributed thereto. (d) Indemnification for Events Occurring Prior to Termination of Court Services. The obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless for those injuries provided for in Sections I I (b) and I I (c) extends to those events occurring prior to the termination of court services under this Agreement. No obligation exists to indemnify for injuries caused by or resulting from events occurring after the last day of court services under this Agreement. The obligation, of a party, to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless, under Sections I I (b) and 11(c) shall survive termination of this Agreement for any event that occurred prior to such termination. 11. Actions Contesting Agreement. Each party shall appear and defend any action or legal proceeding brought to determine or contest: (i) the validity of this Agreement and/or (ii) the legal authority of Mesa and/or Pasco to undertake the activities contemplated by this Agreement. If both parties to this Agreement are not named as parties to the action, the party named shall give the other party prompt notice of the action and provide the other an opportunity to intervene. Each party shall bear any costs and expenses taxed by the court against it; any costs and expenses assessed by a court against both parties jointly shall be shared equally. 12. Independent Contractor. Each party to this Agreement is an independent contractor with respect to the subject matter herein. Nothing in this Agreement shall make any employee of Mesa a Pasco employee for any purpose, including, but not limited to, for withholding of taxes, payment of benefits, worker's compensation pursuant to Title 51 RCW, or any other rights or privileges accorded Pasco's employees by virtue of their employment. Nothing in this Agreement shall make any employee of Pasco a Mesa employee for any purpose, including but not limited to for withholding taxes, payment of benefits, worker's compensation pursuant to Title 51 RCW, or any other rights or privileges accorded Mesa employees by virtue of their employment. At all times pertinent hereto, employees of Pasco are acting as Pasco employees and employees of Mesa are acting as Mesa employees. 13. Notice. Any notice or other communication given hereunder shall be deemed sufficient, if in writing and delivered personally to the addressee, or sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows, or to such other address as may be designated by the addressee by written notice to the other party: To Pasco: Dot French, Court Administrator City of Pasco 525 North 3rd Avenue Pasco, WA 99301 509-545-3492 Interlocal Agreement between City of Mesa and City of Pasco for Municipal Court Services Page 5 Page 17 of 100 To Mesa; Teresa Standridge, City Clerk PO Box 146 Mesa, WA 99343 (509) 265-4253 14. Partial Invalidity. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law. Any provision of this Agreement which shall prove to be invalid, void or illegal shall in no way affect, impair, or invalidate any other provisions hereof, and such other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall be subject to re -negotiation as provided in this Agreement. 15. Assignability. The rights, duties, and obligations of either party to this Agreement may not be assigned to any third party without the prior written consent of the other party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and supersedes any prior understandings and agreements between them regarding the subject matter hereof. There are no other representations, agreements, or understandings, oral or written, between the parties hereto relating to the subject matter of this Agreement. No amendment of, or supplement to, this Agreement shall be valid or effective unless made in writing and executed by the parties hereto. 17. Mediation/Arbitration Clause. In the event of a dispute regarding the breach, interpretation, or enforcement of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve the dispute. In the event that the parties, either with or without the assistance of a mediator cannot resolve the dispute, such dispute shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A. The costs of the arbitrator shall be equally borne between the parties, however the Arbitrator may award attorney fees and costs of the substantially prevailing party as an additional award against the other. Venue shall be placed in Pasco, Washington and in the event of a de novo appeal, the parties waive their respective rights to a jury trial. 18. Captions. The section and paragraph captions used in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not control or affect the meaning or construction of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 19, Interlocal Cooperation Act Provision. No separate legal or administrative entity is intended to be created pursuant to this Agreement. No special fund or budgets are anticipated, nor shall be created as a result of this Agreement. For the purpose of administration, the City Manager, or his designee, is designated as the Administrator on behalf of the City of Pasco; and the Mayor, or the Mayor's designee, is designated as the Administrator on behalf of the City of Mesa. A copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the Franklin County Auditor, or alternatively listed by subject on either Parties' website or other electronically retrievable public source. Interlocal Agreement between City of Mesa and City of Pasco for Municipal Court services Page 6 Page 18 of 100 20. Duration and Termination. The terms of this Agreement shall be for a period of two (2) years. The Agreement shall take effect on, 2013 or as soon thereafter as all of the following events have occurred: (a) Approval of the Agreement by the official action of the governing bodies of each of the parties hereto. (b) Execution of the Agreement by the duly authorized representative of each of the parties hereto. (c) Filing a copy of this Agreement with the Franklin County Auditor. Either party may elect to terminate this Agreement by written notice of termination to the other party delivered by regular mail to the contact person identified herein. Said termination shall become effective one -hundred eighty (180) days from the date of receipt of said written notice. DATED this ?2 day of 2013. CITY OF PASCO Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST �f De ie Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM Lee Kerr, Attorney TY F MESA David M. Ferguson, Ma ATTEST (,I,- � - Teresa ndridge, City Clerfe APPROVED AS TO FORM Lee Kerr, Attorney Interlocal Agreement between City of Mesa and City of Pasco for Municipal Court Services Page 7 Page 19 of 100 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 27, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: Design and Construction Management Services Agreement for City Hall Remodel Project I. REFERENCE(S): Proposed Agreement Summary Sheet II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with CKJT Architects for the City Hall Remodel Project and, further, authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $96,000 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Upon completion of the Police Community Services Building in mid 2016, a significant portion of City Hall will be vacated following the move by the Police Department. The same growth and corresponding increase in demand for public services that precipitated the need for the Police Community Services Building has similarly impacted the other departments operating out of City Hall. The recently adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) includes a project for the renovation of portions of City Hall to accommodate current and future space and functional deficiencies associated with the building. CKJT Architects provided the original design and construction management services when the building was renovated for City use in 1995. The firm also provided services for a significant remodel in 2003 as well as some minor projects since that time. Because of their familiarity with, and past successes associated with the facility building, staff is recommending that CKJT is the most qualified firm to undertake the 2016 remodel project as well. Page 20 of 100 The attached Professional Services Agreement summary provides an outline of the proposed services and compensation. As the project is a remodel, the construction cost is likely to be subject to a greater number of variables compared to new construction. The current owners/partners of CKJT have arranged to sell the firm to two existing associates, both of whom have extensive experience with the City Hall building. For the two reasons above, the proposed agreement has been structured to provide for fixed fee payments for: A) pre -design ($5,000); B) schematic design ($12,000); and C) design development services ($17,000), with A and B being completed prior to December 31, 2015. Construction services (documents, bidding and construction administration services) will be payable based on a percentage (5.5%) of construction cost which is common in the industry. Given the variable nature of remodel projects and the phasing that will be necessary during construction, so as to minimize disruption in the workplace, the percentage basis is viewed as a reasonable method to determine compensation for the architect's services for construction. Given the current rough estimate of $1.4 million ($1.1 million basic construction cost) for the project, the estimated cost for professional design and construction administration services is estimated at approximately $96,000. V. DISCUSSION: This item was discussed at the October 26 Council workshop meeting. Staff recommends approval of the Agreement. Page 21 of 100 Professional Services Agreement (Summary Sheet) Project: Design and Construction Management Services Agreement for City Hall Remodel Prod ect Consultant: CKJT Architects Address: 128 Vista Way, Kennewick, WA 99336 Scope of Services: Pre -design and as -built services; schematic design; design development; construction documents: biddiniz: construction administration. Term: 24 months Completion Date: November 2017 Payments to Consultant: ❑ Hourly Rate: $ ® Fixed Sum of: $34,000 (pre -design, schematic design, design development) © Other: 5.5% Construction cost (construction documents, bidding, construction administration) Insurance to be Provided: 1. Commercial General Liability: ❑ $1,000,000 each occurrence; ❑ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or ❑X $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $200,000,000 general aggregate 2. Professional Liability: ® $1,000,000 per claim; ® $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or ❑ $ per claim; and $ per policy aggregate limit Other Information: Ownership of the firm will change on January 1, 2016, however new owners/partners are current associates in the firm and have been involved in multiple prior projects involving City Hall construction and renovation. Signature by: ❑ Mayor ® City Manager Page 22 of 100 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 27, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 FROM: Bob Gear, Fire Chief Fire Department SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement for Automatic Aid Response I. REFERENCE(S): Interlocal Agreement for Automatic Aid Response II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve the Interlocal Agreement for automatic aid response and, further, authorize the City Manger to execute the agreement. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Offset of services between participating agencies. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: The City of Pasco currently receives and provides automatic aid for fire suppression and ambulance services through an Interlocal Agreement (ILA) among several Tri - Cities agencies, primarily the cities of Kennewick and Richland and the three neighboring Benton County Fire Districts. The recently ratified ILA between the City and Franklin County Fire District #3 provides that Franklin County Fire District #3 become a signatory to the aforementioned ILA for automatic aid. Automatic aid differs from mutual aid in that it is a dispatch of other agencies units during the initial response to an emergency. Mutual aid requires the responsible agency to be at an emergency and overwhelmed by the emergency before requesting outside assistance. V. DISCUSSION: Page 23 of 100 The prospect of Franklin County Fire District #3 becoming signatory on the Automatic Aid ILA generated discussion from among the signatory agencies about the need to update the agreement to more clearly reflect the current practices and operations. While language of the proposed ILA has been updated from the current agreement to better describe current practices and protocols, the agreement is essentially unchanged in terms of content and responsibilities. The updated agreement also adds Fire/EMS agencies in Benton, Franklin and Walla Walla Counties who are regularly responding together in an automatic aid fashion. The expansion of participating agencies acts as a force multiplier which demonstrates the benefit of regional cooperation as an affordable way to make all of the participating communities within the region safer. This item was discussed at the October 26th workshop meeting. Page 24 of 100 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC AID RESPONSE BETWEEN THE CITY OF KENNEWICK, WASHINGTON THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON THE CITY OF RICHLAND, WASHINGTON WEST BENTON REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY, WASHINGTON Benton County Public Hospital District No. 1, Washington BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 1, WASHINGTON BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2, WASHINGTON BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 4, WASHINGTON BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 5, WASHINGTON BENTON COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 6, WASHINGTON FRANKLIN COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 3, WASHINGTON AND WALLA WALLA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 5, WASHINGTON THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of ,2015, by and between the City of Kennewick, Washington, the City of Richland, Washington, and the City of Pasco, Washington, hereafter referred to as the "Cities", West Benton Regional Fire Authority (RFA), Benton County Public Hospital District #1, Benton County Fire Protection District #1, Benton County Fire Protection District #2, Benton County Fire Protection District #4, Benton County Fire Protection District #5 Benton County Fire Protection District #6, Franklin County Fire Protection District #3 and Walla Walla County Fire Protection District #5, hereinafter referred to as the "Districts" and collectively referred to as the "Agencies." This Agreement is entered into under the provisions of RCW 39.34, the Interlocal Cooperation Act. I. Recitals WHEREAS, the Cities of Kennewick, Pasco and Richland maintain organized and equipped fire departments and the Districts are organized and equipped, for the benefit of the citizens of their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, it is the purpose of the Interlocal Cooperation Act and this Agreement to permit local governmental organizations to make the most efficient use of their resources by enabling them to cooperate with other government agencies on the basis of mutual advantage; thereby providing services and organizing facilities in a manner, pursuant to appropriate forms of governmental organization, which best fits with geographic, economic, population, and other factors that influence the needs and development of local communities; and INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC AID RESPONSE - 1 (10/19/2015) Page 25 of 100 WHEREAS, it has been determined by each of the parties hereto that it would be in the best interests of the citizens of the respective jurisdictions, and of mutual benefit to the delivery of emergency services if, in some circumstances, the services of one agency be extended outside corporate limits of that city or district into another; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to enter into an Automatic Aid Response Agreement, wherein under some circumstances an agency will respond automatically to an emergency incident within the corporate limits of another; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to set forth their rights, duties, and responsibilities with respect to said Automatic Aid Response obligations as allowed by State law; NOW, THEREFORE, For and in consideration of the covenants contained herein, performed, and to be performed, the parties hereto agree as follows: II. Terms and Conditions Section 1. The Districts and the Cities, respectively, shall each provide and maintain suitable commercial general liability and auto liability insurance policies to protect it from casualty losses by reason of the activities contemplated by this Agreement. The limits of liability for each coverage shall be at least $5,000,000 each occurrence. Each City and District shall provide the other with a Certificate of Liability Insurance. LIABILITY: Each agency shall be responsible for the wrongful or negligent actions of its employees while performing or arising out of the performance of this agreement as their respective liability shall appear under the laws of the State of Washington and/or Federal Law and this agreement is not intended to diminish or expand such liability. To that end, each agency promises to hold harmless and release all the other participating agencies from any loss, claim or liability arising from or out of the negligent tortious actions or inactions of its employees, officers and officials. Such liability shall be apportioned among the parties or the other at fault persons or entities in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 2. Nothing herein shall be interpreted to: 2.2 Waive any defense arising out of RCW Title 51. 2.3 Limit the ability of a participant to exercise any right, defense, or remedy which a party may have with respect to third parties or the officer(s) whose action or inaction give rise to loss, claim or liability INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC AID RESPONSE - 2 (10/19/2015) Page 26 of 100 including but not limited to an assertion that the employee(s) was acting beyond the scope of his or her employment. 2.4 Cover or require indemnification or payment of any judgment against any individual, agency for intentionally wrongful conduct outside the scope of employment of any individual or for any judgment for punitive damages against any individual agency. Payment of punitive damage awards, fines or sanctions shall be the sole responsibility of the individual against whom said judgment is rendered and/or his or her municipal or county district employer, should that employer elect to make said payment voluntarily. This agreement does not require indemnification of any punitive damage awards or for any order imposing fines or sanctions. Section 2. The Districts and Cities hereunder shall maintain suitable workmen's compensation coverage for its own employees without cost to the other parties to this Agreement, and the Districts and Cities shall pay their own personnel, without cost to the other party. Section 3. Each of the parties hereto shall be fully responsible for all repairs, maintenance, and upkeep of all equipment in use pursuant to this Agreement, while said equipment is used outside of its geographical boundaries, said repair, upkeep and maintenance to include gas, oil, lubrication, parts replacement, and repair of casualty damage. Section 4. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that every effort should be made to become familiar with each other's equipment and only use and operate equipment that they have been trained on. Section 5. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the deployment of agency resources will be done following a pre -determined and agreed method utilizing the most current Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) methodology. Section 6. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the service mutually agreed to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be Fire, Rescue, and Emergency Medical Services. Section 7. The availability of resources is dependent on many factors and this Agreement will not bind any party to provide services to another in a manner that causes undue risk to the safety of the citizens of the Cities or the Districts, or the employees of the Agencies. The intent of this Agreement is to increase the overall INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC AID RESPONSE - 3 (10/19/2015) Page 27 of 100 safety to the citizens of the Cities and the Districts, and the employees of the Agencies, through the pre -planned and coordinated sharing of available resources. Section 8. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that, for the purposes of liaison and the administration of this Agreement, there is hereby delegated the authority to the fire chiefs or other representatives appointed by the controlling board of each of the parties to jointly form an administrative board for carrying out this Agreement. It is also understood and agreed that responsibility may be delegated to agents or employees of the respective Agencies to develop and implement deployment plans that meet the intent of this Agreement. Each party to this Agreement shall appoint members to this deployment planning group who are familiar with the process of Computer Aided Dispatch and that each party shall furnish the administrative board, in writing, the names and rank of all participating members. Section 9. It is further understood and agreed that the most senior officer of the first arriving unit will assume command of the incident until relieved by an officer from the jurisdiction having authority. It is recognized that in some situations an agency may be confronted with an incident for which a more qualified incident commander is available from another party to this Agreement. In those situations the senior officer from the host jurisdiction may delegate authority to a more qualified individual to command the incident. However, the host agency will retain responsibility for the incident. Section 10. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that this Agreement is made with the understanding that no charges will be assessed directly to any of the other parties to this Agreement for services in their primary service area. Section 11. It is also understood that parties to this Agreement provide services to areas within or adjacent to the jurisdiction in which fees for services are charged (example; federal jurisdiction lands). When other parties to this Agreement provide services to those areas, the party responsible for serving those areas agrees to reimburse the other agencies for their services after receiving reimbursement from the agency having jurisdiction. Section 12. Refusal to provide services to areas under separate contracts or agreements by a party to this Agreement will not void this Agreement for other areas. Section 13. Safe and successful implementation of this Agreement is dependent on training and familiarization between the parties to this Agreement. To facilitate these needs, the administrative board will delegate responsibility to a training and equipment officer group comprised of members from each of the participating agencies. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC AID RESPONSE - 4 (10/19/2015) Page 28 of 100 Section 14. This Agreement shall become effective thirty (30) days after being signed and shall remain in full force and effect for one year from the first date indicated above and shall be automatically renewed from year-to-year by the parties hereto, after an annual review, unless terminated. This Agreement may be terminated by any of the parties after giving notice in writing of its intention to terminate not less than ninety (90) days from or after the date of said notice. Section 15. It is not the intention that a separate legal entity be established to conduct the cooperative undertaking nor is the acquiring, holding or disposing of real or personal property anticipated. The administrators of this Agreement shall be the fire chiefs or other representatives appointed by the controlling board of the Agencies. Section 16. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement or its application is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement or the applications of the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected. Section 17. Copies of this Agreement shall be filed with the appropriate County Auditor's Office or posted on the websites of the Agencies. Section 18. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunto placed their hands and seals on the day and year first indicated. CITY OF KENNEWICK Approved as to Form: MARIE MOSLEY, City Manager LISA BEATON, City Attorney Date: CITY OF PASCO By: DAVE ZABELL, City Manager Date: Approved as to Form: LELAND KERR, City Attorney INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC AID RESPONSE - 5 (10/19/2015) Page 29 of 100 CITY OF RICHLAND Approved as to Form: CYNTHIA JOHNSON, City Manager HEATHER KINTZLEY, City Attorney Date: WEST BENTON RFA Approved as to Form: Bv: MORGAN EVERETT, Chair Board of Commissioners Date: BENTON COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT #1 By: Title: Board of Commissioners Date: BENTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #1 By: JERRY MORRIS, Chair Board of Fire Commissioners Date: BENTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #2 By: BARRY ORTH, Chair Board of Fire Commissioners Date: Attorney for West Benton RFA Approved as to Form: Attorney for Hospital District #1 Approved as to Form: Attorney for Fire District #1 Approved as to Form: Attorney for Fire District #2 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC AID RESPONSE - 6 (10/19/2015) Page 30 of 100 BENTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #4 By: ANDREW J. HILL, Chair Board of Fire Commissioners Date: BENTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #5 By: DAN SCHMITT, Chair Board of Fire Commissioners Date: Approved as to Form: Attorney for Fire District #4 Approved as to Form: Attorney for Fire District #5 BENTON COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #6 Approved as to Form: By: HAROLD JUERGENS, Chair Attorney for Fire District #6 Board of Fire Commissioners Date: FRANKLIN COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #3 Approved as to Form: By: RON SHUCK, Chair Attorney for Fire District #3 Board of Fire Commissioners Date: WALLA WALLA COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT #5 Approved as to Form: By: BRAD LANGDELL, Chair Attorney for Fire District #5 Board of Fire Commissioners Date: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC AID RESPONSE - 7 (10/19/2015) Page 31 of 100 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 26, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Easement Vacation: Easement in the Plat of Agri -Center (MF# VAC 2015-014 I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Proposed Ordinance IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , an ordinance vacating the east/west easement between Lots -8-15 Plat of Agri -Center. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: Rowand Machinery and JJ Williams Trucking petitioned for the vacation of the east/west easement located between Lots 8-15 of the Plat of Agri -Center. As previously recommended, the City Council set November 2, 2015 as the date to consider the proposed vacation. V. DISCUSSION: The Agri -Center development on the north side of James Street was platted in 1977 with a utility easement down the center of Lots 8-15 rather than along the edge of the Page 32 of 100 adjoining streets. Rowand Machinery is in the process of designing a new facility for Lots 10-13 and is unable to locate their proposed building on the property due to the easement in question and a north south sewer easement. Vacation of the east/west easement would facilitate the location of a large building on the property and would permit Rowand Machinery to expand their business in Pasco. The easement in question has never contained utilities and is not anticipated to be needed for future utility services. The current standard for the provision of utility service is for utilities be located in or immediately adjacent to public right-of-way. There is no public purpose for maintaining the easement through the center of the Plat of Agri -Center. Page 33 of 100 Item: Agri -Center Easement Vacation Overview Applicant: Rowand/JJ Williams N Map2015-014File #. VAC o , T F, 11 JAMES ST' rs?7 SITE �t.. _�." �, �.► ,'9� 1 �, s 7 \ z ^^ ui �,^w � . ,fir t1��1 � � Q •� M` Y , CD W: �, t 1- Vicinity Item: Agri -Center Easement Vacation Applicant: Rowand/JJ Williams N Map File VAC 2015-014 + IT JAMES ST 901 WHEN RECORDED PLEASE RETURN TO: City of Pasco Attn: City Planner 525 North 3' Pasco, WA 99301 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE EAST/WEST EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTS 8-15 PLAT OF AGRI-CENTER. WHEREAS, a qualified petition has been submitted to the City Council of the City of Pasco requesting vacation of certain utility easement within the City of Pasco; and WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate easements; and WHEREAS, all steps and procedures required by law to vacate said easement have been duly taken and performed; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the east/west easement between Lots 8-15, Plat of Agri -Center as depicted in Exhibit "1" be and the same is hereby vacated. Section 2. That a certified copy of this ordinance be recorded by the City Clerk of the City of Pasco in and with the office of the Auditor of Franklin County, Washington. Section 3. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, this 2nd day of November, 2015. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney 1 Page 36 of 100 CD 0 0 Exhibit Item' Agri -Center Easement Vacation Applicant: Rowand/JJ Williams x � File #: VAC 2015-014 1 JAMES ST AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 26, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Road 84 Estates (MF # PP 2015-004) I. REFERENCE(S): Overview Map Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Preliminary Plat Report to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 9/17/15 & 10/15/2015 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , a resolution approving the Preliminary Plat for Road 84 Estates. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On September 17, 2015 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to develop a recommendation for the City Council on the preliminary plat for Road 84 Estates. The proposed plat contains 16 -lots on a ten acre site located on Road 84 just south of Livingston Elementary School. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission determined that with conditions, the preliminary plat could be recommended for approval. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached resolution. Page 38 of 100 No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. V. DISCUSSION: Page 39 of 100 lowi NPA" a 4 Awl bm tit ME ME PM I MISS *MIN ol Igm A Z- lip..� AN —IF p is ME Sm dW! jr OZ w i" I Imik li -- mpr7ill Vicinity Item: Preliminary Plat - Road 84 Estates 1 Map Applicant: Mission Investments LLC -(N�- File #: PP 2015-004 i RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ROAD 84 ESTATES. WHEREAS, RCW 58.17 enables the City to uniformly administer the process of subdividing property for the overall welfare of the community; and, WHEREAS, owners and developers of property situated in the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., have requested approval of a preliminary plat; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said preliminary plat which is named Road 84 Estates; and, WHEREAS, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission found the proposed plat promoted the general welfare of the community and recommended said preliminary plat be approved with conditions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That the preliminary plat for Broad 84 Estates located in southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 21, Township 9 North, Range 29, East W.M., is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1) At the time lots are developed, all abutting roads and utilities shall be installed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, and storm water retention or management. Sidewalks and street lights within the plat are not required due to the RS -20 zoning. 2) The developer must obtain the necessary easement and right-of-way relinquishment from the FCID for the southern 20 feet of the plat prior to submittal of construction drawings. 3) The developer must comply with PMC 26.04.115(B) and PMC 3.07.160 dealing with water rights acquisition. 4) No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 5) All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 6) All storm water is to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. 7) The developer shall insure active and ongoing dust, weed and litter abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision and construction of dwellings thereon. 8) The developer shall prepare a dust, weed and erosion control plan to be approved by the City prior to approval of any construction drawings for the first phase of the subdivision. 9) The developer shall be responsible for the creation of record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form shall be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. 1 Page 42 of 100 10) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings shall utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum and shall be identified on each such submittal. 11) The final plat(s) shall contain a 10 -foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD and an easement across Lot 1-8 as required by the FCID. 12) The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". 13) Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer must enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer will be responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement must be presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. 14) The developer will be required to comply with the City of Pasco Civil Plan Review process. 15) The developeribuilder shall pay the "traffic impact fee" and "park fee" established by ordinance at the time of issuance of building permits for homes. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 2nd day of November, 2015. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney 2 Page 43 of 100 CD O 0 O 5 le,2 P2` � Q 0 30 60 SCALE 1 inch = 30ft. -WARGENT.$f�_ < W RICHARDSON RD W LIVWG MISSION INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL ORIGINALLY SURVEYED IN 2013, ROS AF)}1802012 W ORADIEST TON RD f51T "�% PREPARED DY, ROAD 84 & WALDRON SETBACKS: PASCO, WA 99301 THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FRONT 25'/SIDE 10'/13ACK 25' DESCRIPTION COLUMBIA PARK TRAIL-STE 201 99352 R09-783 GROSS AREA, 9.95 ACRES 509-783-4141 (OFFICE} 141 ( (OFFICE) PROPOSED DEDICATED RIGHT -GF -WAY - ROAD ROAD A -76,748 50 FT 509-783-2994 (FAX) THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE PREPARED BY READ 80E SQ IT NET AREA: N334,088 50 FT -334, S ROAD 84 ESTATES NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE LARGEST LOT: -21,117 SO FT 3250 PORT OF BENTON BLVD SMALLEST LOT; 21,085 50 FT ED(EfpfISES,RC RICHLAND, WA 99354 SOUTHST QUARTER F THE NORTHWESTQUARTER OF 21, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, PROPOSED DEDICATED ROAD A 1329 LINEAR FEET ROGER G. KWIGHT, R.E. roge,Org.enterprises, com DATE: 08/29/15 RANGE29, EAST, W.MO FRANKLINWASHINGTON. COUNTY, DRAWN BY: AD G PORTION OF THE N.W. 114 OF SEC. 21, T.9 N., R.29 E., W.M. 16 01 CITY OF PASCO FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON k� q e UES el _ 9 R _ N8933'26"'E 664.43 - IJ893453'E 66464 R - 25' ,! PED SERMCE 30' R/W TO BE DEDICATED - 30` R/W TO BE DEDICATED IRR 9776 SO FT SERI10E PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 4 PARCEL 5 N PARCEL 6 PARCEL 7 PARCEL 8 k ?: 21,117 SF 21,117 SF s n 21,117 SF 21,117 SF 21,117 SF r 21,117 SIF o 21,117 SIF g 21,117 SF = i 2� R20'(TYP) SEWER SERb10E q ///''-WA7R SERVICE / TYPICAL 10'x10' FPUD ESMT TYPICAL LOTS 1,3,5,&7 I AL / _ 139,13 156.89 8.57 155.42 1 8.36 15f 32 158-27 r 1 139.18 r _ ---SHE_ BE DEDICATED AS' RIGHY-E F -WAY 132891 _ M "' ry - PVC 55 4W- QOLF PVC 4 PVC 55 40OF- 17 z INSTALL 3° n - CR FU WE GC. '. 58 f>E ME NT ------ 1.53_62_: _ - - ------------- _ _'7--- --- ---�- ---- R20'("I'YP) �. m a CD I f 1' � 10' FPUD ESMT 'p' FPUD ESMT o- o I PARCEL12 w PARCEL13 w PARCEL14 r PARCEL15 PARCEL16 z � I PARCEL $ ^ � PARCEL 10 _ _ N � PARCEL11 1^v m 21,085 SF -� 21,085 SF :n � 21,085 SF s `� 21,085 SF f q 21,085 SF `" `^ 3 .� _ 21,085 SF 21,085 SF 21,085 SF m M 7 q N n - O O S a 30' R/W TO HE DEDICATED ,o ..... z z z = ' I SPAN GUY AND - z - 30' R/W TO DE DEDICATED ,., D GUY POLE TO - .. 9,810 SO FT �-- BE REMOVED - ' - ----_ _. _ _.._ ........ - - - - - - - -- --- '_ - - I HOOL ��-� 2� AF95037 ROAD/IRR EASEMENT T BE RELINQUISHED SHED --_ __ 20' AF#95037 ROAD/IRR EMEN AS T TO BE RELINQUISHED 0 211, - 589'36'00°W 664 33 S89'3525°W 654 42 0 VEWAY AF#95037 ROAD R/W 5 le,2 P2` � Q 0 30 60 SCALE 1 inch = 30ft. -WARGENT.$f�_ < W RICHARDSON RD W LIVWG MISSION INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL ORIGINALLY SURVEYED IN 2013, ROS AF)}1802012 W ORADIEST TON RD f51T "�% PREPARED DY, VICINITY SKETCH NOT TO SCALE i IIlG -- OF ---- QP OWNER INFORMATION ORIGINAL SURVEY DATA PLAT INFORMATION MISSION INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL ORIGINALLY SURVEYED IN 2013, ROS AF)}1802012 LOCATION: ZONING: PARCEL N0.118412021 R-5-20 10217 WILLOW WAY PREPARED DY, ROAD 84 & WALDRON SETBACKS: PASCO, WA 99301 ROGERS SURVEYING INC. PS FRONT 25'/SIDE 10'/13ACK 25' 509-375-3555 COLUMBIA PARK TRAIL-STE 201 99352 R09-783 GROSS AREA, 9.95 ACRES 509-783-4141 (OFFICE} 141 ( (OFFICE) PROPOSED DEDICATED RIGHT -GF -WAY - ROAD ROAD A -76,748 50 FT 509-783-2994 (FAX) ROAD 84 -9,776 SO FT PREPARED BY READ 80E SQ IT NET AREA: N334,088 50 FT -334, S PROPOSED LOT SIZE: RGW ENTERPRISES, PC LARGEST LOT: -21,117 SO FT 3250 PORT OF BENTON BLVD SMALLEST LOT; 21,085 50 FT ED(EfpfISES,RC RICHLAND, WA 99354 509-375-3565 PROPOSED DEDICATED ROAD A 1329 LINEAR FEET ROGER G. KWIGHT, R.E. roge,Org.enterprises, com DATE: 08/29/15 DRAWN BY: AD G REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2015-004 APPLICANT: Mission Investments LLC HEARING DATE: 9/17/2015 10217 Willow Way ACTION DATE: 10/15/2015 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Road 84 Estates 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: The south 1/2 of the south 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 21, Township 9 North, Range 29 East WM, Franklin County, Washington. General Location: 2300 Block of Road 84 Property Size: 9.95 Acres Number of Lots: 16 single-family lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 21,085 ft2 to 21,117 ft2 Average Lot Square Footage: 2 1, 10 1 ft2 2. ACCESS: The property has access from Road 84 3. UTILITIES: Utilities exist in in Road 84. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned RS -20. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: RS -20 - Single-Family/Elementary School SOUTH: RS -20 - Single Family/Vacant EAST: RS -20 - Vacant/Single-Family WEST: RS -20 - Single -Family 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for low density residential development. Policy H -1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU -2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. Page 45 of 100 ANALYSIS The property was recently annexed to the City and zoned RS -20 as a part of the Road 80 Annexation. The proposed plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and RS -20 zoning. The proposal is a rather straight forward simple plat with one exception. The southern boundary of the property abuts a 20 -foot road easement and irrigation right-of-way aligned with Wernett Road. Under ideal circumstances the developer would be required to provide an additional 10 feet of right-of-way for Wernett Road and build the north half of the street. However, the telephone company was previously allowed to install telephone equipment on the center line of where the future Wernett Road should be located. The initial solution to this problem involved construction of an island around the telephone equipment splitting the future east and west bound lanes of Wernett Road. As the County never required right-of-way from the property owners to the south (two houses are located to the south) the utility island would extend onto private property. The island would create confusion for motorists in that the private driveway to the south would appear as the east bound lane for Wernett when in reality it is a private driveway dead ending on a private residential lot. After lengthy discussions on how to connect Wernett Road with Road 84 the applicant is proposing to shift Wernett Road 133 feet to the north and replace the 20 -foot easement/right-of-way with a full width (60 ft.) street with additional 10 foot easements all designed to City standards. Wernett would connect to the east with a short jog on Road 80. This proposal would eliminate difficulties in dealing with the telephone equipment and the private driveway where Wernett would ideally connect to Road 84. The Franklin County Irrigation District has indicated in written correspondence they are willing to relocate their easement and right-of- way to the north. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 16 residential lots; with the lots varying in size from 21,085 to 21,117 square feet. The average lot size is 21,101 square feet. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have adequate frontage on streets which will be dedicated. UTILITIES: Currently, municipal sewer and water lines are located in Road 84. The developer will be responsible for extending utilities into the plat. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the construction design phase of the platting process. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not encroach upon buildable portions of the lots. 2 Page 46 of 100 The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are not required in RS -20 zoning districts. STREET NAMES: Streets continuing from surrounding subdivisions will carry the names from the other subdivisions and streets without names will all be named prior to final platting. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires installation of irrigation lines as a part of infrastructure improvements. WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/ developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. The Public Works Director may waive the fee if the developer mixes a soil additive in the ground that provides 30% retention of irrigation water. In this case there are no water rights to deed to the City as a result the current fee will be required before a final plat is approved. INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.110) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact": Prevent Overcrowding: With an average lot size of 21,101 square feet the proposed development will address the overcrowding concern by providing manageable lots and usable open spaces. RS -20 zoning requires a 25 -foot front yard setback, ten -foot side yard setbacks and a rear yard of 25 feet. Parks Opens Space/Schools: The proposed plat is located within a half of a mile from Chiawana Park. The developer will be required to pay the current park fee prior to receiving building permits. The developer will be required to pay the current school impact fee prior to receiving building permits. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new home at the time of building permit issuance. 3 Page 47 of 100 Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The plat is laid out for low-density residential development consistent with surrounding residential developments. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The Plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. The proposed section of Wernett Road that will be built with this plat will provide a connection between Road 84 and Road 80 improving traffic circulation and improving options for the delivery of emergency services in the neighborhood. There is an existing sidewalk along Road 84 but due to the RS -20 zoning sidewalks are not required within the proposed plat. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. This plat will improve opportunities to provide water and fire protection services to the existing neighborhood on Road 80 to the north of the site. Provision of Housing for State Residents: The proposed preliminary plat contains 16 building lots, providing opportunities for the construction of 16 new homes for Pasco residents. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitation of 40 percent and building setbacks will assure adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: Access streets will be paved and developed to City standards to assure that proper access is maintained to each lot. The discussion under safe travel above applies to this section also. Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is designated for low-density single-family development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings: • The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Area Boundary. • The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within Urban Growth Boundaries. • The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for single-family development. • The site is currently zoned RS -20. • Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 160 vehicle trips per day. • The current traffic impact fee is $709 per dwelling unit. The impact fees are collected at the time permits are issued and said fees are used to make traffic improvements and add traffic signals in the 1-182 Corridor when warranted. 4 Page 48 of 100 • RCW 58.17. 110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved. • The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012. • Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop Findings of Fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary sewer, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the Franklin County PUD, the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable and Ben -Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. The FCID will require a replacement easement as a part of the Wernett Street realignment. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for additional housing within the City. The plat also provides for improved traffic circulation in the neighborhood (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; 5 Page 49 of 100 The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low-density residential development. Plan Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community while Plan Policy H-1-13 supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. The proposed subdivision deviates slightly from the Major Street Plan that generally identifies Wernett Road connecting to Road 84 along quarter section lines. The proposal generally meets the overall intent of the Plan by connecting allowing Wernett Road to connect to Road 84 with a minor jog of 133 feet. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e. school impact fees, park fees, traffic fees) are included in approval conditions. (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. If approved the proposed plat will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to insure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will insure the public use and interest are served. TENTATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. At the time lots are developed, all abutting roads and utilities shall be installed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, and storm water retention or management. Sidewalks and street lights within the plat are not required due to the RS -20 zoning. 2. The developer must obtain the necessary easement and right-of-way relinquishment from the FCID for the southern 20 feet of the plat prior to submittal of construction drawings. U Page 50 of 100 3. The developer must comply with PMC 26.04.115(B) and PMC 3.07.160 dealing with water rights acquisition. 4. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. S. All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 6. All storm water is to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. 7. The developer shall insure active and ongoing dust, weed and litter abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision and construction of dwellings thereon. 8. The developer shall prepare a dust, weed and erosion control plan to be approved by the City prior to approval of any construction drawings for the first phase of the subdivision. 9. The developer shall be responsible for the creation of record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form shall be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. 10. All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings shall utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum and shall be identified on each such submittal. 11. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10 -foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD and an easement across Lot 1-8 as required by the FCID. 12. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". 13. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer must enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer will be responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement must be presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. 14. The developer will be required to comply with the City of Pasco Civil Plan Review process. 7 Page 51 of 100 15. The developer/ builder shall pay the "traffic impact fee" and "park fee" established by ordinance at the time of issuance of building permits for homes. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 15, 2015 staff report. MOTION: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Road 84 Estates with conditions as listed in the October 15, 2015 staff report. 3 Page 52 of 100 lowi NPA" a 4 Awl bm tit ME ME PM I MISS *MIN ol Igm A Z- lip..� AN —IF p is ME Sm dW! jr OZ w i" I Imik li -- mpr7ill Vicinity Item: Preliminary Plat - Road 84 Estates 1 Map Applicant: Mission Investments LLC -(N�- File #: PP 2015-004 i p Zoning Item: Preliminary Plat - Road 84 Estates1 Applicant: Mission Investments LLC -Cx- Map File #: PP 2015-004 j KLIN RD CHARDSON RD RS -20 COURT ST SITE HIPPLE AVE i i i F' ]--'\ RS -20 ROBERTS DR RS -20 (County) CD O 0 O 5 le,2 P2` � Q 0 30 60 SCALE 1 inch = 30ft. -WARGENT.$f�_ < W RICHARDSON RD W LIVWG MISSION INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL ORIGINALLY SURVEYED IN 2013, ROS AF)}1802012 W ORADIEST TON RD f51T "�% PREPARED DY, ROAD 84 & WALDRON SETBACKS: PASCO, WA 99301 THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FRONT 25'/SIDE 10'/13ACK 25' DESCRIPTION COLUMBIA PARK TRAIL-STE 201 99352 R09-783 GROSS AREA, 9.95 ACRES 509-783-4141 (OFFICE} 141 ( (OFFICE) PROPOSED DEDICATED RIGHT -GF -WAY - ROAD ROAD A -76,748 50 FT 509-783-2994 (FAX) THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE PREPARED BY READ 80E SQ IT NET AREA: N334,088 50 FT -334, S ROAD 84 ESTATES NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE LARGEST LOT: -21,117 SO FT 3250 PORT OF BENTON BLVD SMALLEST LOT; 21,085 50 FT ED(EfpfISES,RC RICHLAND, WA 99354 SOUTHST QUARTER F THE NORTHWESTQUARTER OF 21, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, PROPOSED DEDICATED ROAD A 1329 LINEAR FEET ROGER G. KWIGHT, R.E. roge,Org.enterprises, com DATE: 08/29/15 RANGE29, EAST, W.MO FRANKLINWASHINGTON. COUNTY, DRAWN BY: AD G PORTION OF THE N.W. 114 OF SEC. 21, T.9 N., R.29 E., W.M. 16 01 CITY OF PASCO FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON k� q e UES el _ 9 R _ N8933'26"'E 664.43 - IJ893453'E 66464 R - 25' ,! PED SERMCE 30' R/W TO BE DEDICATED - 30` R/W TO BE DEDICATED IRR 9776 SO FT SERI10E PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 4 PARCEL 5 N PARCEL 6 PARCEL 7 PARCEL 8 k ?: 21,117 SF 21,117 SF s n 21,117 SF 21,117 SF 21,117 SF r 21,117 SIF o 21,117 SIF g 21,117 SF = i 2� R20'(TYP) SEWER SERb10E q ///''-WA7R SERVICE / TYPICAL 10'x10' FPUD ESMT TYPICAL LOTS 1,3,5,&7 I AL / _ 139,13 156.89 8.57 155.42 1 8.36 15f 32 158-27 r 1 139.18 r _ ---SHE_ BE DEDICATED AS' RIGHY-E F -WAY 132891 _ M "' ry - PVC 55 4W- QOLF PVC 4 PVC 55 40OF- 17 z INSTALL 3° n - CR FU WE GC. '. 58 f>E ME NT ------ 1.53_62_: _ - - ------------- _ _'7--- --- ---�- ---- R20'("I'YP) �. m a CD I f 1' � 10' FPUD ESMT 'p' FPUD ESMT o- o I PARCEL12 w PARCEL13 w PARCEL14 r PARCEL15 PARCEL16 z � I PARCEL $ ^ � PARCEL 10 _ _ N � PARCEL11 1^v m 21,085 SF -� 21,085 SF :n � 21,085 SF s `� 21,085 SF f q 21,085 SF `" `^ 3 .� _ 21,085 SF 21,085 SF 21,085 SF m M 7 q N n - O O S a 30' R/W TO HE DEDICATED ,o ..... z z z = ' I SPAN GUY AND - z - 30' R/W TO DE DEDICATED ,., D GUY POLE TO - .. 9,810 SO FT �-- BE REMOVED - ' - ----_ _. _ _.._ ........ - - - - - - - -- --- '_ - - I HOOL ��-� 2� AF95037 ROAD/IRR EASEMENT T BE RELINQUISHED SHED --_ __ 20' AF#95037 ROAD/IRR EMEN AS T TO BE RELINQUISHED 0 211, - 589'36'00°W 664 33 S89'3525°W 654 42 0 VEWAY AF#95037 ROAD R/W 5 le,2 P2` � Q 0 30 60 SCALE 1 inch = 30ft. -WARGENT.$f�_ < W RICHARDSON RD W LIVWG MISSION INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL ORIGINALLY SURVEYED IN 2013, ROS AF)}1802012 W ORADIEST TON RD f51T "�% PREPARED DY, VICINITY SKETCH NOT TO SCALE i IIlG -- OF ---- QP OWNER INFORMATION ORIGINAL SURVEY DATA PLAT INFORMATION MISSION INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL ORIGINALLY SURVEYED IN 2013, ROS AF)}1802012 LOCATION: ZONING: PARCEL N0.118412021 R-5-20 10217 WILLOW WAY PREPARED DY, ROAD 84 & WALDRON SETBACKS: PASCO, WA 99301 ROGERS SURVEYING INC. PS FRONT 25'/SIDE 10'/13ACK 25' 509-375-3555 COLUMBIA PARK TRAIL-STE 201 99352 R09-783 GROSS AREA, 9.95 ACRES 509-783-4141 (OFFICE} 141 ( (OFFICE) PROPOSED DEDICATED RIGHT -GF -WAY - ROAD ROAD A -76,748 50 FT 509-783-2994 (FAX) ROAD 84 -9,776 SO FT PREPARED BY READ 80E SQ IT NET AREA: N334,088 50 FT -334, S PROPOSED LOT SIZE: RGW ENTERPRISES, PC LARGEST LOT: -21,117 SO FT 3250 PORT OF BENTON BLVD SMALLEST LOT; 21,085 50 FT ED(EfpfISES,RC RICHLAND, WA 99354 509-375-3565 PROPOSED DEDICATED ROAD A 1329 LINEAR FEET ROGER G. KWIGHT, R.E. roge,Org.enterprises, com DATE: 08/29/15 DRAWN BY: AD G 4 �z�r�r�Es • r _ 17 -- - - \. - _I I I f d o i t • \ - - �;.. IF Id,I If 4(k II off I off I I..rai. -IF - FIFI IF FF Y IF A IF AP .. FIs _ _ I F,FoFF. F4`Fr c� _ -+`-• y-.1 -Of_ w < ?� a s yam= e • _ �k - l,t� s F} " a:N " -�� s. J T 'f.- r - r _ _ w -IIIIr y},n- 'F IIII . j _Z .ri IF _ ho> •- :. .' I! r 9L,i 4v�'- l _ .,� - _ - u IF IF to 14 ys R. !"�.- FFFI_ P „lii+% ,T - IFFIFF-Y.. IYr p, .i t,a'if . J.', t _''1>� _• _-. �c! _ -7-'. i -g" Y, 'i,' t4_ - aYl.. ., _ 't �. .. 1` J, - - -13�+ 1� FoFFII if f JEFF At- - ,, _ -P- . $'.J ' ' �� . ti� ?•a. • + � 2rj' �j ,- . t 17 k nc r i'• _:.. -- - �.- - f 1 - _ i, :v'r sirl cA -lxt <. _- r - . .... _, _�_<.. wIf I._e_ - `- - IF op I I,Ih n••Y l.i.. 4 $,1, f.:. s- C _ . mac- - -�r2-i••� t.� _ -- _IF I t .r. :C ,�. _� �. .�' _ - :-�- , . - - - IF VI If- Ipf Its, I If Iff IF I FIFO I* OFF, oF IF I IF 1. FINIII, _ +( FIFF,; pp III of ...tom'... fr _ { - -= c'FIFF . "� _'1 1. I or'c _ ) v� - _ mom 4 of IF . - - a - - 1 w . �<i _ 'C ''xt:-- _ t. - .SOL• .y . R - Y -� [ ,.. c ` �s . his _-.. �. �" :e - 1 - e r' r .� .v. .�3►- - .g _ -, .. 'rte -a'♦ _ i ,'....k y _ :,v. ,..•i? ..�--. - - ..., k q.l .-.0 , l',k i!F}. _ - _ _ - of% LF -. 1 - It; Or I IF FINI W1, VT Of II omi _ r _ t 33i. .;. _ 15 - -, SSI a. _y' .k. r= '� •i ,t »_a. ..�. .„.�< , dm�loii IFFIF If - :��� -.. - {" �'t -rte. _ l „- .r / dt- '�. ... '> ,,_ 41..1913 -i. '1 r - d �c,�; .'_i... �. �. .._1 �. y._. •..' :� . C yr't'- "}�._. ,... t-.:.•,F,ti J -I., - �. l>�s I•- T- `v _ �I L :-.,�; - a .•.+'If.=..�r> _k - v_OFF 'Y #•. - - �1`- `r. , .�,iJ^ f. -Ih' - •, _M - ti' . i. / �L 6 lv` -� - >. - jal.- a- 1:�2^ R F _ ^'1 - ,p� - a <I = - ,9i , Y- .. - f , - - .. - - .. . T i `_', ..l 1;:' +� of of I r if Fir 4.4 1 fir. .. �%%" FL I IF` _ .�' .'a !, r'+.,It 1J. _ •. yIF I' f• 'I 'd.IF- '1.ILI _ 15 A p FIC _ �,. - ,� - -'�w dn''_ -v f' _ _ d SIr _ IR. �r - r,- _ +tee-• !,, _ _ T,• I-� _ •I1 ^`9, iIt - + .IT 9i_, T - - J, - -�, '.}'. Y "Y( SIr of Y .3 W• Z ' . e- if .. `1. .' 1. fa 1 ye _ f ! ,� .a' "�Ifi -. - .:,; _,. � -a 1� t -jn - u.a fr• . i , �. S. -n�:. ;' ,r n• I ,. �j�j :.-:�AOL'-�s�y �^` ; Jr all. - :?} �' ,f 'kn ri' k' 1sT ,� e 3 - qi' 4pi�ie s • "�4.f. - ... tl =1 T+off: "Il a: MIFF f t - �- e /__• 5j,,:. ,ice..�1 .5rw i4C • �r _r-^ ��•f� ri ' Tf, ,I . av ' a s._}t t IF ..+�.� -41Pa.v =,,1j :a'`.'ef+1 ._.IF.IFIMF of I '.'T ,-2 IF .. or 41 1^YIF kl or _ `'r_ '., \.' .�IF q 3. - - : A-', rl� f ii r� iiV - 1 h' -1_ ! ..� < '!IR a t::U . �1` r.. IF r 4 1b ,IJA Of ,�qt res" �. - r -..4 )) �.yya e_. .f "!, _ -r ,1f r.'71 ./ - 'e Zr±;.'G:A- G.., -:f'1 - ,�1='� '.1 J,- -T .�" `P` ' IF 1 For f 4q�: t ,� i t' i „e-... .3 iw "s- _ - ..Y1 a,;ti 'I •' .A �{'! P- 'i" _ '.', , '1 y,,: �.� -,` r3 C r - �I ,*. ` v e_ of IF ♦ :'r { , i i(. - .. ` C _:� ;If n - '�-' » .� la .�, 'r •.} ) • ��yyyyff , - e H f4•: - sr y 'xj:�'- i 9'/t • 1 �. i-� .I. �: ,. aj�,.•f �1k1 ' S - A r '1'. >• tt i. ^-.._,' 11 �1 s i� Y r - .i r!A a. bF .. `7}. i .,y '+ �`' v '�1w, ..ice n _l. .� .° r + . h `.. r. f..tIr i " Y--- _,r �.f-"i. • nr. -Y' ..,i ..� , , w, gjaF 5,+`' r' ) 1 /4.J1 I, -.r'_ .0 1. r �'v .,. t: tiN ' ', i .' 'b f.- .. , - ti .- .� 4,1.. .� P ,.�'.f • .�-',*.��. �. 1'" f.» i♦ .1 ,� '7'Ik Y �F.y!-�\,a:artiry�$}.j�'l>."" 'Y.. .r. A f'. ,I.'� ,q, 6. r. '.11 ,.' �4. '♦ - -t.�. ' �k _ r� - a3 6 ,: .fir .!"ej ``-- �'1-, •- .l :.1� - _ _'i!� 'SIF! - - ,! s,7s, �'iv �. - - 4 -c a yy . r r- . 1 !r' 'i�. :.i .�aT - _1 n, i. •Y'e.. -77- - '.i.. ., _ -- i•' _ - ;f' F "F aJ(u1a .ir J''. .arid -d \. - . - :/• - JY. ' - _ 'y" . J .2 . ,7 �r 1 _r". i 'Ti... "- Y ', r �,': s �r - ,k-•_ . kfL�-, - '< Yy _ `e `4. '4' alr'i" 'r- .l'j' p, ,�[`t:' - ��11 .'1' ',. :'I- i� e�w '�- `.4 •1L^ :'o _ ,i'�cd l i .. 'Af. �'! 'Y' 1'„ "C -r�Aq .a.o/l .ky,. 4: , r - - , c. For C K7 (r_vao I0 c _ U r ter:.- ?�':._�N.al. . ... r,- -A4 r: J �ir_':i r'. 1 .G.1e-L. _ ,- ._ 4. i. ..,SnC •c - . _,.�_,i _ a .. P 'lam-•��r - : '-.,� -"`- :-a: '�F'- x ' _ ,x_ - �, ;- +� -3e -- - --- ;gam � A "r^,.J `„QCs-;' 1. -icw IT .e y . ^' _I`•� f,. �.� - - -- 'C Vii' r`.e.F•at .A: r l Lit - .f 1. -P° _ - •` `6.. "'�'-_TiI "'!ikF."As Ow jo .11F_ - - !yIl,. 114 ':.y ''�1' 4 _ _ - .0 3 r j w n -'"/' I _ {'' �`�.- w'-� Ik 1 y_I .O > - Or .ate t4, _ r ]IPa..r`�`w,�rn�:� T=ry Via! s¢. 'y - •� � yL;;.lOr llFilK twill qrr IV {-, -. a r rf s_ psi :. ,:sc ,Ow I I :�" - 1 I.' �! IS sAW Ar r fOF IOil AA s Y- 94 ¢USA: T J. - MR a = - .. P 'lam-•��r - : '-.,� -"`- :-a: '�F'- x ' _ ,x_ - �, ;- +� -3e -- - --- ;gam � A "r^,.J `„QCs-;' 1. -icw IT .e y . ^' _I`•� f,. �.� - - -- 'C Vii' r`.e.F•at .A: r l Lit - .f 1. -P° _ - •` `6.. "'�'-_TiI "'!ikF."As Ow jo .11F_ - - !yIl,. 114 ':.y ''�1' 4 _ _ - .0 3 r j w n -'"/' I _ {'' �`�.- w'-� Ik 1 y_I .O > - Or .ate t4, _ r ]IPa..r`�`w,�rn�:� T=ry Via! s¢. 'y - •� � yL;;.lOr llFilK twill qrr IV {-, -. a r rf s_ psi :. ,:sc ,Ow I I :�" - 1 I.' �! IS sAW Ar r fOF IOil AA s Y- 94 ¢USA: �r MR a .. P 'lam-•��r - : '-.,� -"`- :-a: '�F'- x ' _ ,x_ - �, ;- +� -3e -- - --- ;gam � A "r^,.J `„QCs-;' 1. -icw IT .e y . ^' _I`•� f,. �.� - - -- 'C Vii' r`.e.F•at .A: r l Lit - .f 1. -P° _ - •` `6.. "'�'-_TiI "'!ikF."As Ow jo .11F_ - - !yIl,. 114 ':.y ''�1' 4 _ _ - .0 3 r j w n -'"/' I _ {'' �`�.- w'-� Ik 1 y_I .O > - Or .ate t4, _ r ]IPa..r`�`w,�rn�:� T=ry Via! s¢. 'y - •� � yL;;.lOr llFilK twill qrr IV {-, -. a r rf s_ psi :. ,:sc ,Ow I I :�" - 1 I.' �! IS sAW Ar r fOF IOil AA s Y- ¢USA: �r -: = - i _r arty line) e :- - _ "_ ♦ .. i [ I .'Y. _".. ��-.cam.'. -.. :. 1 4 q _ ♦ _ _.. � `� 17 ."_rte •. ,,.....,.L _. '.0 _ '_ .. .'f -r .-. ". �.* ly--,•�,: � �.�.. ..�f a.. c., •.„J ••'.P 1 - ., s_ `r•-a"_^X��i 'a'' �`]. � i..�_ .a-._ �-y�� -#� .h �`�r � � -__ I .r. I - ✓ '� 4.- I ` y�T tx ~t y 7 t off Ift r • : � 1 y, -',s ,Ly'+ '-iL +E _ � s i. (� '�. r '-� � F .' ♦ s :,Y ... �� _. ,l .i �Y ?1+ # _ � R .�n `4ti r'`ytib i.l \' '.r .. �rt �'. � .,a a1 'yv c� � � _ ” l� �''�• tit ya _ ti-♦ Tr %rti� {�\ - �a'��fae�•. LC' J=!.'1_kcJ� X45S-_'ria�i��'`s.!a�-:_+..-_.:.a•K <, t `.., S ',� rte_. y v. .�.�:.�-. _<_�._ - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 9/17/2015 E. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat for Road 84 Estates (Mission Investments LLC) (MF# PP 2015-004) Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the application for a preliminary plat for Road 84 Estates. This is a rather straight -forward plat containing 16 lots, no slopes or retaining walls to worry about. It is a 10 acre parcel recently annexed into the City and the developers have purchased the property to develop it compatible with the current zoning of RS -20 (Suburban). There was one minor complication relating to where Wernett Road should extend to Road 84. Ideally, Wernett would continue in a straight line from the east to the west but the County allowed the telephone company to place equipment dead center of where the street was supposed to go. One of the solutions was to create a concrete island around the equipment and build the street on either side of the equipment. However, when the two homes to the south were built the County didn't obtain any right-of-way for the south half of the street so that further complicates things. The developer has spoken with the FCID who controls the road easement and right-of-way for irrigation, along the south side of the property and the FCID has agreed to relinquish the easement as long as they are provided an alternate easement. The developer is proposing to provide an alternate easement and roadway down the center of his development. Roger Wright, 10217 Willow Way, spoke on behalf of the applicant. He clarified that the lot sizes will actually be a bit larger than what is required to justify bringing sewer to the property. He also provided some history on the road easements, right-of-way and confusion with the phone equipment. Some of the nearby residents have expressed that they don't want Road 80 to be extended through, however, at some point in time it will go from Argent down to Court Street. This development will build roughly 350 feet of the road. He is happy with the conditions in the staff report. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Greenaway moved, seconded by Commissioner Bachart, to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the October 15, 2015 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 10/15/2015 C. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat for Road 84 Estates (Mission Investments) (MF# PP 2015-004) 1 Page 62 of 100 Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the preliminary plat application for Road 84 Estates. There were no changes to the staff report since the previous meeting. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Bachart, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 15, 2015 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Portugal moved, seconded by Commissioner Bachart, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Road 84 Estates with conditions as listed in the October 15, 2015 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. 2 Page 63 of 100 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 26, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Shane O'Neill, Planner I Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat: Sunrise Estates, Division II (MF# PP 2015-002) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Preliminary Plat Report to the Planning Commission Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 9/17/15 & 10/15/15 IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , approving a Preliminary Plat for Sunrise Estates Division II. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On September 17, 2015 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to develop a recommendation for the City Council on the preliminary plat for Sunrise Estates, Division II. The proposed preliminary plat contains 31 -lots on an 8.7 acre site located at the the northwest corner of Heritage Blvd. and Helena Street. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission determined that with conditions, the preliminary plat could be recommended for approval. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached resolution. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. Page 64 of 100 V. DISCUSSION: Page 65 of 100 VicinitY Item: Sunrise Estates Phase II Ap MapFile plicant: Juan Ochoa N #: PP 2015-002 X1. - L ►1 1S v7 T w — UP NR— y a_ �''�`� � _� s,,,:�„ •�:��z �' 14 -ell 1 woo T � M INNna: r lik SITE v TE - 1 y• 11 x. L O _ { kt RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SUNRISE ESTATES DIVISION II. WHEREAS, RCW 58.17 enables the City to uniformly administer the process of subdividing property for the overall welfare of the community; and, WHEREAS, owners and developers of property situated on the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, Section 28, located westerly of Heritage Boulevard right-of-way and less Sunrise Estates Phase 1, have requested approval of a preliminary plat; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said preliminary plat which is named Sunrise Estates Division II; and, WHEREAS, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission found the proposed plat promoted the general welfare of the community and recommended said preliminary plat be approved with conditions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That the preliminary plat for Sunrise Estates Division II, located on the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, Section 28, located westerly of Heritage Boulevard right-of-way and less Sunrise Estates Phase 1, is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1) At the time lots are developed, all abutting roads and utilities shall be installed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps must be completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. All proposed utilities must be installed underground by the developer at the developer's expense. 2) The developer must comply with PMC 26.04.115(B) and PMC 3.07.160 dealing with water rights acquisition. 3) No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 4) Lots 8, 10 & 15 shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s) as lots that present difficulties for the placement of front yard fencing. 5) All storm water is to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. Page 67 of 100 6) The developer shall insure active and ongoing dust, weed and litter abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision and construction of dwellings thereon. The developer shall not place construction refuse upon adjoining parcels. 7) The developer shall prepare a dust, weed and erosion control plan to be approved by the City prior to approval of any construction drawings for the first phase of the subdivision. 8) The developer shall be responsible for the creation of record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form shall be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. 9) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings shall utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum and shall be identified on each such submittal. 10) The final plat(s) shall contain a 10 -foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 11) The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". 12) Street lighting must be installed to the City of Pasco/Franklin County PUD standards and as directed by the City Engineer. Residential street lights are typically installed every 300 feet, and collector/arterial type street lights are typically installed every 150 feet. Street light positioning is alternating and is measured along the centerline of the road. 13) Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer must enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer will be responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement must be presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. 14) The developer will be required to conform to all conditions set forth in the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement including, but not limited to, regular cleaning and maintenance of all streets, gutters, catch basins and catch basin protection systems. Cleaning shall occur on a regular basis to ensure that no excess buildup of sand, trash, grass clippings, weeds or other debris occurs in any portion of the streets, gutters, or storm water collection facilities. Cleaning and upkeep of the streets, gutters, and storm water collection facilities must be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer will be responsible for operating and maintaining the storm drain system in accordance with the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement. 15) The developer will be required to comply with the City of Pasco Civil Plan Review process. 0 Page 68 of 100 16) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $275 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. 17) The developer/builder shall pay the "school impact fee" and "park fee" established by ordinance at the time of issuance of building permits for homes. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 2nd day of November, 2015. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 69 of 100 PREPARED BY: MINISTER AND GLAESER SURVEYING, INC. 6303 BURDEN BLVD., UITE E PRELIMINARY PLAT LINE LENGTH OF L2 PASCO,WA 99301 (509) 44-7802 SHORT PLAT 200.2--10 HACIENDA ESTATES 226) ' CONTACT PERSON: CONTAC A SUBDIVISION IN A PORTION OF THE ALL PRO CONTRACTING, INC. 1'RELIMINAR Y SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28 (VOL. 1, PG. 564) (VOL. D, PG. T. 9 N., R 30 E., W. M., IC WA 99336 IC WA 99336 90'00'00" (5 NE , REC. 07-25-2002 i REC. 03-19-2003 55.00 51'04'33" FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON OWNER/ DEVELOPER: OWNER/ DEVELOPER: 1 RELIMINAR Y PRELIMINARY AF #1609345 NJ /' AF #1621073 o N00'35'15"W C75 4514 W. 9TH AVENUE 2644.28' 54'27'33" KENNEWICK, WA 99336 BASIS OF BEARING. 28.97 (509) 544-0696 PASCO509) I WA 493 1 NORTH 8947'03" EAST HELD ALONG w 62.82 55.00 THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 67.00 67.00 62.11 94.06 79x2 IN VOL. 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 54 , RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, QUARTER OF SEC77ON 28 BETWEEN MONUMENTS FOUND AS NOTED. `D CO 50 m �" 7: _ 2 69�. sF Uv 48 TAX PARCEL NO. 113-890-032 m m N -• p .00i I�yA 9.497. SF • y �� X 0 N00'35'17"W 1271.90" • • • • - • • • • • • 118.77 65.65' 65.74' 115.81 44.88' 91.74 104.00' 74.75' to FISIING51,1 7.00' 164.39' 89.36' m 30' 30' SEE ti w toy87 0 71 m NOTE 1, z SALINAS at Z89 88 .", 10,558. SF O N 8.037. SF A 68 hh h 4'"91 m II,01 i. SF O 7,588. SF ]0 69 0 q, 7,743. SF N50' m +• J' It838. SF ' m b Nm r0{. .t Nw!p 4+' 2.34 0 °i m Fa p U4 0, 'h try N AF #548992 y �a: z N00'35'17'W �, 7,812. 5FP W 7,494. SF rr •. 67 90 m�' 116.64mz jmm 9,468. SF REC. 01-27-1998 1 10,85}. SFS �! • x3. sF r.i 92 .m m VV m 72 tO . m ^-i`^' 7't 'I"E• TAX PARCEL NO. 113-900-084 7,801. SF RI N C90 9 1 > m • I,I m C122 • •q�3' 4 92 C91 • ,40 8.028. SF £ • SyA910 > rnU .'• N15�0' • e�.5^8 • 6J�.46' • • tl`N00'35'17"W W 9"• m N S00'41'58"E 'U 91, E u rn 118.66 LIVINGSTON5'T7"W 1 2,r' o OLSON CT 86 e = 66D 7.00' -p 00'39'28"E 1 57,595.93 N00'4T56"W w 248.24' ..N J m w cou `• N117.24 10.7.290, SF o • mSEMENT a C97 ° •' _• • k 6,030. SF z • ,80/" O w z J; . 26.74 D 03 E• a ym �'+ _ mDpm±N00'39'28"W • C83 • 4pO• N018.618W • U) • 41.50. mC132 • • 65J6 m `1'S�• 55�W1+s15515E m o"p3,zp.a101.58' L2 z C84 z • m 74 a7,74662 SFS m '1'1� p l toO 30' 30' SEE NOTE 1 m •I 8.032. SF m A 8,834. SF N 4'� 8 13.414. SF63. SF w V 94 N 9 85 m O N u m b 64 -,, 30,, m£ Cb S �' '" 164 ,m, j' 0 7,234. SF o m b 82 w N 83 OA'I �js' 10,111. SF v G C SEE 5 m 63 ,J„ N 7,674. SF • �`,+ "G o C 10,893. SF O 10,889. SF 8, 09. SF i. �+ N0085'17"W • NOTE 2 7^7,435. SFN -. s'• $ • N 56 • • 0. 'F - NDO'39'28"W • u W 8.20 m 29.96 7" 39.47 m • 118.71 In 156 m 9,958. SF • u • m r I N00'35'17"W 102.21' `O r \ 30.67 115.011 5' s o I 10 z • .4 £ 91.20' \ 91.20' 114.04' 55.41' $ 75 • 65.65 • 65.64 • • • x,9. y , - N00'39'28"W 278.79' 47 z � 277.00' p 6.34' G7 • • • •' 8,033. SF 67.00 67.00 67.00 45.28 r9, • p0 p0 93.61' 185.17' 9,731. sF ;; O 7O Z o m " 95 N '� • 63.00 69.43 89.43 69.43 70.55 g J 1 Q .p; m o No 7.382. sF p D \ 30' 30' 1.3 2.72 Z 57 A� s. 6� 64 z • a • • mco F}1 to Ili a m Qm z D o m SEE NOTE mut 80 m m `5.14 N00'35'17"W �n m zm zm 8,261. x616 �i640005' • • • • $ • _ Sz9• 1 N A rn W m eCi �� m 'a • N003928" • m 81 wf�N .mt 7^ 8.331. SN $ 79 -3, 78 (.11 7] 116.73 ' m r+i' b ' m ' eA m m rami 3 o v w 0 102.85 N y N �• 58 'y, " CS 711 f0^ w 91 C53j$Z_ 710826•• j PROJECT 7.81 ACRES, 9,826. 5F fn0 W Z O w 8,339 SF O W 8.331. SF o W 8,399. SFS 61 O w�n Z O N 59 21111,7.335. Sf'w q, C39 O D .: 48 CI19 B 11' 4J N N P�R��IEL.0 A DATA T{ES MORE OR LESS 76 + 7,903. SF 1,oao. sF�s, Nm, • • '"•w • 44 m I U' 3 C +I m m A W m O+ O pi D r N z 7,922. Sr A • CO O s d 38,7nz. SF o m m o z0 ;o 0 0 m 0'm o m c s.7ts. sF rt tri 7^ �• $ 39 D "' w z 46 0 -1' TOTAL LOT AREA NET 26.3 DEVELOPABLE ACRES M mC: vtj v 96 io 0 o r� SEE NOTE 2 £ 60 N w 8,569. SF u m ? ( ` z D D ri N m o £' £ E £ J • 22.82 • p Oi z b 13,199. SF m O • 0 7,60.1. SF • O • m N i o 8,037. BF • .• `o. m m • SOo'3 '51"w • u, °: o TOTAL RESIDENTIAL AREA (NET) 21.6 DEVELOPABLE ACRES I oo _ �g05 9.aS 63. s o • 698 • • pp, two 70,642. SF •'��. � > �N o o TOTAL OPEN SPACE 3.32 ACRES - j _ P 38 m> (7 x4.43' a W N a T E.47 • • ' • • • �'• pNAC 0 1 • 43 m 45 " �; • N o ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 8.17 ACRES • w a N00'39'2B"W ANACONDA AVENUE ``s- 1254.01' w •s' S 18,289. SF 10.827' Sr ,�, rn o • N BFO' • oa. TOTAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS 102 _ 276.32' w 253'99 a m 37 +y1 • • '1'€ w ii" 5 .. v LARGEST RESIDENTIAL LOT 18747 SF 460.79' 0 260.91' m o • m • 11.244. SF h5 T3S w a • N 0 • • • • • w o .h� ry Jo 0 • SMALLEST RESIDEN77AL LOT 7203 SF • ° • 4. @. _�_ n o r3 w 31.89' h h 17'Li, 0 • o ei Ab AO' a 42 d q 95� AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL COT 9131 SF --- - m • ' u • m • • W 30 46.0 ' '• 14'49" b 10,605. SF 35 • o SEE NOTE ui N 21000 P uAi• 29 jl $ 8,354. SF £ • tao.at • z p N • 6y�o TOTAL COMMERCIAL AREA (NET) 4.7 DEVELOPABLE ACRES Q a 30' 30' SEE NOTE i 0 £ 1,560. SF o m 22 10,144. SF •! 30' W. SEE NOTE 1 ✓� 41 w w ° • pp 6 0 13 0 0 14 o w', 8,639, SF 20.00 m m 40 w ,o -- -TOTAL COMMERCIAL LOTS 5 7'! 8,219. SF w (71 7,619. SF m 7,972. SF 00 0.55 ,••J n 13,907. 5F OD N00'39'28"W • • C37 36 m i 18,747. sF stns. 5F o 0! '� LARGEST COMMERCIAL LOT 44601 SF ONi rn m N00'39'28"W r m N00'39'28"W • N00'39'28"W • • 500'39'28"E • 500'48'4" • • 0'48'40"E 119.82 C30 • 'p • N "' 110 D N 4 • 0 .76 • � O • 99.46 101.22 108.40 z 109.17' 126.19' `70.26' m • y rvh 16 X SMALLEST COMMERCIAL LOT 38742 SF N N m b ; m 3725 30' 30' SEE NOTE i m mm M. 30 NSEE OTE 1 m 31 OZ • 0016.55" • • v AVERAGE COMMERCIAL LOT 41153 SF 44.601. sF 02, f D C12 m� 37.25 D o4: m !• D 7,925. SF D Zl 5, p 15 C17 • D • C24 20 m aU1 28 m o C �`. T7 EXISTING ZONING R FAH -1 M o 7,678. SF •° o fTl •• 7,2002. SF oN 7,313. SF �1 8,226. SF - o, 23 10,081. SF o °! 5•- • .Z1 35 mm (� n • • 8,778. SF Z 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 4.58 (7 to D $ a 15.0.353 -'10 • 9,395. SF N u p1 r �l 5 r'1 D TOPOGRAPHY UNDULATING NOD* 9'28'W , •? "4 . 0' '28"W • N00'3 '28" • 17 • N00'39'28"W • 500'48'40" • s w • S 04840 • 99• O $ 1.ti V1 m p WATER PURVEYOR CITY OF PASCO 500'48'4U`E �'. 83.14 77.30 78.59 84.10 z 109.20 m rn 725'•7 z - • v • 7g• m • Ny55e oo. Z i.1 SEWER SERVICE CITY OF PASCO • 277.01• N m m NoiE 2 >�> 32 7e9r7" y2p6 TRACT A w U' ELECTRIC PURVEYOR FRANKLIN COUNTY PUD i -i A to 27 N 10,984. SF 34 • • ni 2.29 ACRES -` O - z 11 b -1 19 j g 24 m 10.079. SF 91846. EXISTING 50' R/W m 8 9,486. SF O'1 • • 10,700. SF ; 8,780. SF e m 1 p , J 50' 4Ai, f 10.190. SF • • Sf J t' 9,626. SF • m m 33 O m '` Or9 W 41 • f ,1, m • SOo'48'40"E • • 0048 ^ • b`1' 11,623. SF 0° p 5 q� O O w m OT m 126.14 yo' `GS TP J zo 5 m z yA5 f Z y ro m �Y b 109.23 n a s V��\ 6o' O o m p 44.496. SF z m .ti 'h w m 7'<2 ' 0ti' ; ` y' o o s o p0 25 26 m C4 - • + �� R, m ^b1 i0 0 '�• O 17 m n 0� 18 2 + a �'„ 8,527. SF • • 9797 SF £ • O to T 9,051. SF W N t0 8,730. SF Oi w 9,163. SF w 1�• w 01 0,794. SF to 1 n 1 130.30 • 361 • 7 0 • • 2� • ° o 800'48 40"E • N D 450.02' - BILLINGS ST g so12a5.61 "E a -47.46'00"E $ N00'48'40"W k- Rm470.00 • • • • • L-201.08 • 4 ' - O, m 97 • = m ° N 103 m „� m 7,g03. SF 7>, BOTTS 7.40099 o b� �• 7.231. SF 0 00 f•1 z J 0, D 'd, Z ° o O C0 CA IS AF #1626929 _ '+'• o+ m e N00'46'40"W r�• T8� rn w N C• Nooa6'ao^w . m 104 s 102 g 116.01 Dz REC. 06-26-2003 116.01 N 7,374. SF (n m N 106 A • • 7,826. SF N 7,482. SF A w BLOCK 1 m � TAX PARCEL NO. 113-870-143 BLOCK ('/ rn to 7,482, SF D rn � 00 N00'4840"W • DNI• _- ___ _.-1---1-_.I I__ _L..I_.._- ____ __ • N00'48'40"W • • O F- • • 116.01' rt I --- - -- -- r�( ( l - - 30' 116.01' %r m SEE NOTE 2 j �.-L.-I I 'I I m 0 ? 99 WASHINGTON ADDITION TO PASCO s� SF > Z • 0 7.482. SF WASHINGTON ADDITION TO PASCO C..1 N o N00'48'40"W • a • 30' 30' ° C73 0 • N 0'48'40"W • 30'm (VOL. B, PG. 54) -A V (VOL. B, PG. 54) • n6.o1• W 661 & 101 m 116`01 z REC. 03-23-1891 f11 106 105 'm _ m 8,604. SF a 100 p REC. 03-23-1891 8,631. SF 466. SF W 7,500. SF • m • m C116 • N tp 90.74 • 9. 2 • w o 49. Ll H 250.06' 500'52'23"E 500.03' SEE NOTE 5 MISSOULA ST LINE TABLE PRELIMINARY PLAT LINE LENGTH OF L2 8.64 SUNRISE ESTA I Z S APPLICANT: CONTACT PERSON: CONTAC A SUBDIVISION IN A PORTION OF THE ALL PRO CONTRACTING, INC. HAA SE 1/4 OF SECTION 28 4514 W. 9TH AVENUE 4514 W. 9TH AVENUE T. 9 N., R 30 E., W. M., IC WA 99336 IC WA 99336 90'00'00" (5 NE , (ON)E , CITY OF PASCO 55.00 51'04'33" FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON OWNER/ DEVELOPER: OWNER/ DEVELOPER: 1 RELIMINAR Y PRELIMINARY JOB NO: 04-453 DECEMBER 02, 2004 TAX PARCEL. NO. 113--900-075 C75 4514 W. 9TH AVENUE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 54'27'33" KENNEWICK, WA 99336 BASIS OF BEARING. 28.97 (509) 544-0696 PASCO509) I WA 493 1 NORTH 8947'03" EAST HELD ALONG 660.92' 62.82 55.00 THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 67.00 67.00 62.11 94.06 79x2 IN VOL. 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 54 , RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, QUARTER OF SEC77ON 28 BETWEEN MONUMENTS FOUND AS NOTED. 51 7.765. SF 50 m �" 7: _ 2 69�. sF Uv 48 m -i ���•----_- 1n W 7,569. SF N p .00i I�yA 9.497. SF • y �� X I pZy f'1 w N N p � `c dq 25.00 90'07'12" N C16 C163 • ,. H • �Sgo�a, 48'11'23" ZT A x 80 40 0 40 80 160 C11 • 6• • • 55.00 29'52'32" Inn y SCALE 1 INCH = 80 FEET 7 C82 NDO'39'28"W • u W 8.20 m 29.96 7" 39.47 m • 118.71 In 156 m 9,958. SF • u • m r I N00'35'17"W 102.21' `O r \ 30.67 115.011 5' s o I 10 z • .4 £ 91.20' \ 91.20' 114.04' 55.41' $ 75 • 65.65 • 65.64 • • • x,9. y , - N00'39'28"W 278.79' 47 z � 277.00' p 6.34' G7 • • • •' 8,033. SF 67.00 67.00 67.00 45.28 r9, • p0 p0 93.61' 185.17' 9,731. sF ;; O 7O Z o m " 95 N '� • 63.00 69.43 89.43 69.43 70.55 g J 1 Q .p; m o No 7.382. sF p D \ 30' 30' 1.3 2.72 Z 57 A� s. 6� 64 z • a • • mco F}1 to Ili a m Qm z D o m SEE NOTE mut 80 m m `5.14 N00'35'17"W �n m zm zm 8,261. x616 �i640005' • • • • $ • _ Sz9• 1 N A rn W m eCi �� m 'a • N003928" • m 81 wf�N .mt 7^ 8.331. SN $ 79 -3, 78 (.11 7] 116.73 ' m r+i' b ' m ' eA m m rami 3 o v w 0 102.85 N y N �• 58 'y, " CS 711 f0^ w 91 C53j$Z_ 710826•• j PROJECT 7.81 ACRES, 9,826. 5F fn0 W Z O w 8,339 SF O W 8.331. SF o W 8,399. SFS 61 O w�n Z O N 59 21111,7.335. Sf'w q, C39 O D .: 48 CI19 B 11' 4J N N P�R��IEL.0 A DATA T{ES MORE OR LESS 76 + 7,903. SF 1,oao. sF�s, Nm, • • '"•w • 44 m I U' 3 C +I m m A W m O+ O pi D r N z 7,922. Sr A • CO O s d 38,7nz. SF o m m o z0 ;o 0 0 m 0'm o m c s.7ts. sF rt tri 7^ �• $ 39 D "' w z 46 0 -1' TOTAL LOT AREA NET 26.3 DEVELOPABLE ACRES M mC: vtj v 96 io 0 o r� SEE NOTE 2 £ 60 N w 8,569. SF u m ? ( ` z D D ri N m o £' £ E £ J • 22.82 • p Oi z b 13,199. SF m O • 0 7,60.1. SF • O • m N i o 8,037. BF • .• `o. m m • SOo'3 '51"w • u, °: o TOTAL RESIDENTIAL AREA (NET) 21.6 DEVELOPABLE ACRES I oo _ �g05 9.aS 63. s o • 698 • • pp, two 70,642. SF •'��. � > �N o o TOTAL OPEN SPACE 3.32 ACRES - j _ P 38 m> (7 x4.43' a W N a T E.47 • • ' • • • �'• pNAC 0 1 • 43 m 45 " �; • N o ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 8.17 ACRES • w a N00'39'2B"W ANACONDA AVENUE ``s- 1254.01' w •s' S 18,289. SF 10.827' Sr ,�, rn o • N BFO' • oa. TOTAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS 102 _ 276.32' w 253'99 a m 37 +y1 • • '1'€ w ii" 5 .. v LARGEST RESIDENTIAL LOT 18747 SF 460.79' 0 260.91' m o • m • 11.244. SF h5 T3S w a • N 0 • • • • • w o .h� ry Jo 0 • SMALLEST RESIDEN77AL LOT 7203 SF • ° • 4. @. _�_ n o r3 w 31.89' h h 17'Li, 0 • o ei Ab AO' a 42 d q 95� AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL COT 9131 SF --- - m • ' u • m • • W 30 46.0 ' '• 14'49" b 10,605. SF 35 • o SEE NOTE ui N 21000 P uAi• 29 jl $ 8,354. SF £ • tao.at • z p N • 6y�o TOTAL COMMERCIAL AREA (NET) 4.7 DEVELOPABLE ACRES Q a 30' 30' SEE NOTE i 0 £ 1,560. SF o m 22 10,144. SF •! 30' W. SEE NOTE 1 ✓� 41 w w ° • pp 6 0 13 0 0 14 o w', 8,639, SF 20.00 m m 40 w ,o -- -TOTAL COMMERCIAL LOTS 5 7'! 8,219. SF w (71 7,619. SF m 7,972. SF 00 0.55 ,••J n 13,907. 5F OD N00'39'28"W • • C37 36 m i 18,747. sF stns. 5F o 0! '� LARGEST COMMERCIAL LOT 44601 SF ONi rn m N00'39'28"W r m N00'39'28"W • N00'39'28"W • • 500'39'28"E • 500'48'4" • • 0'48'40"E 119.82 C30 • 'p • N "' 110 D N 4 • 0 .76 • � O • 99.46 101.22 108.40 z 109.17' 126.19' `70.26' m • y rvh 16 X SMALLEST COMMERCIAL LOT 38742 SF N N m b ; m 3725 30' 30' SEE NOTE i m mm M. 30 NSEE OTE 1 m 31 OZ • 0016.55" • • v AVERAGE COMMERCIAL LOT 41153 SF 44.601. sF 02, f D C12 m� 37.25 D o4: m !• D 7,925. SF D Zl 5, p 15 C17 • D • C24 20 m aU1 28 m o C �`. T7 EXISTING ZONING R FAH -1 M o 7,678. SF •° o fTl •• 7,2002. SF oN 7,313. SF �1 8,226. SF - o, 23 10,081. SF o °! 5•- • .Z1 35 mm (� n • • 8,778. SF Z 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 4.58 (7 to D $ a 15.0.353 -'10 • 9,395. SF N u p1 r �l 5 r'1 D TOPOGRAPHY UNDULATING NOD* 9'28'W , •? "4 . 0' '28"W • N00'3 '28" • 17 • N00'39'28"W • 500'48'40" • s w • S 04840 • 99• O $ 1.ti V1 m p WATER PURVEYOR CITY OF PASCO 500'48'4U`E �'. 83.14 77.30 78.59 84.10 z 109.20 m rn 725'•7 z - • v • 7g• m • Ny55e oo. Z i.1 SEWER SERVICE CITY OF PASCO • 277.01• N m m NoiE 2 >�> 32 7e9r7" y2p6 TRACT A w U' ELECTRIC PURVEYOR FRANKLIN COUNTY PUD i -i A to 27 N 10,984. SF 34 • • ni 2.29 ACRES -` O - z 11 b -1 19 j g 24 m 10.079. SF 91846. EXISTING 50' R/W m 8 9,486. SF O'1 • • 10,700. SF ; 8,780. SF e m 1 p , J 50' 4Ai, f 10.190. SF • • Sf J t' 9,626. SF • m m 33 O m '` Or9 W 41 • f ,1, m • SOo'48'40"E • • 0048 ^ • b`1' 11,623. SF 0° p 5 q� O O w m OT m 126.14 yo' `GS TP J zo 5 m z yA5 f Z y ro m �Y b 109.23 n a s V��\ 6o' O o m p 44.496. SF z m .ti 'h w m 7'<2 ' 0ti' ; ` y' o o s o p0 25 26 m C4 - • + �� R, m ^b1 i0 0 '�• O 17 m n 0� 18 2 + a �'„ 8,527. SF • • 9797 SF £ • O to T 9,051. SF W N t0 8,730. SF Oi w 9,163. SF w 1�• w 01 0,794. SF to 1 n 1 130.30 • 361 • 7 0 • • 2� • ° o 800'48 40"E • N D 450.02' - BILLINGS ST g so12a5.61 "E a -47.46'00"E $ N00'48'40"W k- Rm470.00 • • • • • L-201.08 • 4 ' - O, m 97 • = m ° N 103 m „� m 7,g03. SF 7>, BOTTS 7.40099 o b� �• 7.231. SF 0 00 f•1 z J 0, D 'd, Z ° o O C0 CA IS AF #1626929 _ '+'• o+ m e N00'46'40"W r�• T8� rn w N C• Nooa6'ao^w . m 104 s 102 g 116.01 Dz REC. 06-26-2003 116.01 N 7,374. SF (n m N 106 A • • 7,826. SF N 7,482. SF A w BLOCK 1 m � TAX PARCEL NO. 113-870-143 BLOCK ('/ rn to 7,482, SF D rn � 00 N00'4840"W • DNI• _- ___ _.-1---1-_.I I__ _L..I_.._- ____ __ • N00'48'40"W • • O F- • • 116.01' rt I --- - -- -- r�( ( l - - 30' 116.01' %r m SEE NOTE 2 j �.-L.-I I 'I I m 0 ? 99 WASHINGTON ADDITION TO PASCO s� SF > Z • 0 7.482. SF WASHINGTON ADDITION TO PASCO C..1 N o N00'48'40"W • a • 30' 30' ° C73 0 • N 0'48'40"W • 30'm (VOL. B, PG. 54) -A V (VOL. B, PG. 54) • n6.o1• W 661 & 101 m 116`01 z REC. 03-23-1891 f11 106 105 'm _ m 8,604. SF a 100 p REC. 03-23-1891 8,631. SF 466. SF W 7,500. SF • m • m C116 • N tp 90.74 • 9. 2 • w o 49. Ll H 250.06' 500'52'23"E 500.03' SEE NOTE 5 MISSOULA ST 982.31 LINE TABLE PARCEL A (TAX PARCEL NO. 113-890-014) LINE LENGTH THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION L2 8.64 28, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANCE 30 EAST, W.M., FRANKLIN COUNTY, APPLICANT: CONTACT PERSON: CONTAC WASHINGTON EXCEPT THE WEST 30 RODS AND EXCEPT THE SOUTH ALL PRO CONTRACTING, INC. HAA 50 FEET FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT 4514 W. 9TH AVENUE 4514 W. 9TH AVENUE C3 IC WA 99336 IC WA 99336 90'00'00" (5 NE , (ON)E , PARCEL B (TAX PARCEL NO. 113-900-093) 55.00 51'04'33" ' OF THESOF OWNER/ DEVELOPER: OWNER/ DEVELOPER: 1 RELIMINAR Y PRELIMINARY 8E TOWNSH PS9 NORTH, RANCE 30QUARTER EAST, WSM,QUARTEFRANKLIN COUNTY,N WASHINGTON. TAX PARCEL NO. 113-900-093. ALL PRO CONTRACTING, INC. FRANKLIN COUTNY C75 4514 W. 9TH AVENUE IRRIGATION DISTRICT 54'27'33" KENNEWICK, WA 99336 PO BOX 3907 28.97 (509) 544-0696 PASCO509) I WA 493 1 PARCEL C C77 62.82 55.00 65'26'21" 59.46 ALL OF BLOCK 8 IN WASHINGTON ADDITION TO PASCO AS RECORDED 62.11 55.00 IN VOL. 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 54 , RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, 58.86 C79 WASHINGTON, TOGETHER WITH VACATED ALLEYS IN BLOCK 8 AND 55.00 5525'07" VACATED PORTIONS OF ADJOINING STREETS. MINISTER AND GLAESER SURVEYING, INC. MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO MATTERS OF 25.00 UNWRITTEN TITLE SUCH AS ADVERSE POSSESSION, ACQUIESCENCE, ESTOPPEL, ETC. COO 47.98 55.00 49'59'11" 46.48 C10 39.32 982.31 LEGEND 0 INDICATES MONUMENT TO BE SET p INDICATES 3" BRASS CAP IN CONCRETE WITH CASE AND COVER TO BE SET R/W INDICATES RIGHT-OF-WAY SF INDICATES SQUARE FEET PUD INDICATES PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NOTE 1 60.00' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF PASCO WTIH THIS PLAT. NOTE 2 10.00' PUBLIC UTLITY EASEMENT DEDICATED WTIH THIS PLAT. NOTE 3 20.00' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED WTIH THIS PLAT. NOTE 4 40.00' RIGHT-OF-WAY PER WASHINGTON ADDITION TO PASCO (B-54) NOTE 5 30.00' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L2 8.64 89'13'19W L6 24.29 N 0'39'28"W L71 24.72 00'39'28"E LEGEND 0 INDICATES MONUMENT TO BE SET p INDICATES 3" BRASS CAP IN CONCRETE WITH CASE AND COVER TO BE SET R/W INDICATES RIGHT-OF-WAY SF INDICATES SQUARE FEET PUD INDICATES PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NOTE 1 60.00' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF PASCO WTIH THIS PLAT. NOTE 2 10.00' PUBLIC UTLITY EASEMENT DEDICATED WTIH THIS PLAT. NOTE 3 20.00' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED WTIH THIS PLAT. NOTE 4 40.00' RIGHT-OF-WAY PER WASHINGTON ADDITION TO PASCO (B-54) NOTE 5 30.00' RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATED WITH THIS PLAT CURVE TABLE CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS I DELTA CHORD CURVE LENGIH RADIUS DELTA CHORD C3 39.27 25.00 90'00'00" 35.36 C74 49.03 55.00 51'04'33" 47.42 C4 16.82 20.00 4811'23" 16.33 C75 52.28 55.00 54'27'33" 50.33 C6 28.97 55.00 30'11'01" 28.64 C77 62.82 55.00 65'26'21" 59.46 C8 62.11 55.00 64'41'56" 58.86 C79 53.20 55.00 5525'07" 51.15 C9 39.22 25.00 89'52'48" 35.32 COO 47.98 55.00 49'59'11" 46.48 C10 39.32 25.00 90'07'12" 35.39 C81 16.82 20.00 48'11'23" 16.33 C11 28.68 55.00 29'52'32" 28.35 C82 39.01 25.00 89'23'36" 35.17 C12 16.82 20.00 48'11'23" 16.33 C83 16.82 20.00 48'11'23" 16.33 C13 62.32 55.00 64'55'17" 59.04 C84 8.50 55.00 8151'18" 8.49 C14 41381 55.00 44'06'55"1 41,341 C85 53.571 55.00 55'48'14" 51.48 C15 40.85 55.00 42'33'04" 39.91 C86 48.23 55.00 5014'38" 46.70 C16 39.27 25.00 90'00'00" 35.35 087 43.65 55.00 45'28'15" 42.51 C17 16.82 20.00 48'11'23" 16.33 C88 48.23 55.00 50'14'38" 46.70 C18 29.34 55.00 30'34'00" 29.00 C89 52.87 55.00 55'04'21" 50.85 C19 61.85 55.00 64'26'10" 58.65 C90 10.26 55.00 10'41'23" 10.25 C20 40.85 55.00 4233'04" 39.91 C91 16.82 20.00 4811'23" 16.33 C21 42.36 55.00 44'08'55" 41.34 C92 10.03 25.00 2259'44" 9.97 C22 66.34 55.00 69'06'16" 62.39 C93 47.35 45.00 60'17'10" 45.19 C23 33.95 55.00 352215' 33.42 C94 6.64 25.00 15'1304" 6.62 C24 16.82 20.00 48'11'23" 16.33 C95 38.45 45.00 48'57'15" 37.29 C25 39.44 25.00 90'23'24" 35.48 C96 44.90 45.00 57'09'55' 43.06 C26 54.65 35.00 89*27'25"1 49.26 C97 16.671 25.00 38*12'48" 16.37 C27 55.31 35.00 90*32'35"1 49.73 C98 39.321 25.00 90'07'12" 35.39 C28 54.74 35.00 89'36'36" 49.33 C100 39.44 25.00 90'23'24" 35.48 C29 39.27 25.00 90'00'00" 35.36 C113 157.42 440.00 20'29'58" 156.59 C30 16.82 20.00 48.11'23" 16.33 C114 30.82 440.00 4'00'45" 30.81 C31 54.67 55.00 56'57'01" 52.45 C115 39.53 25.00 90'36'18" 35.54 C32 40.30 55.00 41'58'58" 39.40 CII 7 39.03 25.00 89'27'25" 35.19 C33 40.07 55.00 41'44'47" 39.19 C118 39.01 25.00 89'23'42" 35.17 C34 56.54 55.00 58'53'49" 54.08 C119 7.33 55.00 7'38'19" 7.33 C35 47.54 55.00 49'31'34" 46.08. C120 39.10 25.00 89'36'36" 35.23 C36 26.18 55.00 27'16'37" 25.94 C121 39.44 25.00 90'23'24" 35.48 C37 16.82 20.00 48'11'23" 16.33 C122 16.82 20.00 4811'23" 16.33 C38 28.52 25.00 65'21'11" 26.99 C123 31.04 55.00 32'20'02" 30.63 C39 35.60 20.00 102'00'03" 31.09 C124 41.04 55.00 4245'06" 40.09 C40 55.10 55.00 57'24'17" 52.83 C125 40.15 55.00 41'49'24" 39.26 C44 39.44 55.00 41'05'05' 38.60 C126 39.18 55.00 40'48'40" 38.35 C46 36.07 55.00 37'34'18" 35.42 C127 41.83 55.00 43'34'25" 40.83 _ C47 43.04 55.00 44'50'04" 41.95 C128 41.83 55.00 43'34'25" 40.83 C48 33.64 20.00 96'21'54" 29.81 C131 30.25 55.00 31'30'43" 29.87 C491 40.94 55.00 4238'51" 40.00 C132 16.82 20.00 48'11'23" 16.33 C50 44.20 55.35 45'45'11" 43.04 C133 122.03 200.00 34'57'31"1 120.14 C51 17.27 25.00 39'35'08" 16.93 C157 53.18 55.00 55'23'44" 51.13 C52 14.95 25.00 341527" 14.73 C158 46.181 55.00 48'06'45" 44.84 C53 16.82 20.00 4811'23" 16.33 C159 40.94 55.00 42'38'51" 40.00 C6'1 101.10 230.00 25'11'11" 100.29 C160 38.93 55.00 40'33'15" 38.12 C62 37.39 170.00 12'36'02" 37.31 C161 61.49 55.00 64'03'38" 58.34 C64 79.25 170.00 26'42'34" 78.53 C162 17.25 55.00 17'58'14" 17.18 C65 31.22 170.00 10'31'24" 31.18 C163 16.82 20.00 4811'23" 16.33 C66 39.10 25.00 89'36'36" 35.23 C164 16.90 230.00 412'33" 16.89 C67 55.31 35.00 90_32.'35" 49.73 C165 40.58 230.00 10'06'29" 40.52 C681 55.221 35.00 90'23'24"1 49.67 C166 69,50 230.00 17'18'49" 69.24 C69 39.22 25.00 89'52'48" 35.32 C167 67.26 230.00 16'45'20" 67.02 C70 10 25.00 89'36'36" 35.23 C768 5.81 230.00 1'2fi'49" 5.81 C71 3%.51 25.00 80'32'35" 35.52 C169 92.36 170.00 31' 743" 91.23 C72 39.53 25.00 90'36'24" 35.64 C170 55.50 170.00 18-42'17'pl 55.25 C73 16.82 ?0.00 48'71'23" 76.33 Ci 71 39.26 25.001 35.35 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 2015-002 HEARING DATE: 9/17/2015 ACTION DATE: 10/15/2015 BACKGROUND APPLICANT: Juan Ochoa 99809 E Michelle Drive Kennewick, WA 99338 REQUEST: Preliminary Plat: Sunrise Estates Division II 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: The southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, Section 28, located westerly of Heritage Boulevard right-of-way and less Sunrise Estates Phase 1 General Location: The northwest corner of Heritage Blvd. and Helena Street Property 8.67 Acres Number of Lot/ s Proposed: 31 single-family residential lots Square Footage Range of Lots: 7,335 ft2 to 18,747 ft2 Average Lot Square Footage: 9,131 ft2 2. ACCESS: The property has access from Anaconda Avenue. 3. UTILITIES: Utilities exist in in Anaconda Avenue. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R -1-A. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: NORTH: R-2 - Vacant SOUTH: R -1-A - Single -Family Residences EAST: R -1-A - Vacant WEST: R -1-A - Single -Family Residences S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is intended for both mixed -residential and mixed residential/ commercial development types. Policy H -1-E encourages the advancement of home ownership and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU -2 encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197-11-158. Page 71 of 100 ANALYSIS The proposed plat encompasses 8.67 acres of land to be platted into 31 single- family residential lots. This property was annexed to the City in 1994. In 2004 Council rezoned the site to R -1-A (Low -Density Residential Alternate) and approved the original Sunrise Estates preliminary plat, containing 102 single-family residential lots. The rezone was approved without the use of a concomitant agreement. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for mixed residential development which provides the option to develop single-family homes. The proposed plat is a functional continuation of the initial phases of Sunrise Estates having an overall density and average lot size similar to the initial phases of Sunrise Estates to the south. The Sunrise Estates preliminary plat was originally approved over 10 years ago; because development has not been completed the preliminary plat has expired. In order for development of the plat to continue the remaining portion of the plat must be reviewed and re -approved before a final plat may be accepted. Reviewing the plat now will help ensure current codes and standards will be met. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 31 residential lots; with the lots varying in size from 7,335 to 18,747 square feet. The average lot size is 9,131 square feet. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have adequate frontage on streets which will be dedicated. UTILITIES: Currently, municipal sewer and water lines are located in Anaconda Avenue. The developer will be responsible for extending utilities into the plat. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10 feet of street frontage of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the construction design phase of the platting process. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not encroach upon buildable portions of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and with a maximum interval of 500 feet between hydrants on alternating sides of the street. Streetlights are located at street intersections, with a maximum interval of 300 feet on residential streets, and with a maximum interval of 150 feet on arterial streets. The intervals for street light placements are measure along the centerline of the road. Street lights are placed on alternating sides of the street. STREET NAMES: Streets continuing from surrounding subdivisions will carry the names from the other subdivisions and streets without names will all be named prior to final platting. IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires installation of irrigation lines as a part of infrastructure improvements. 2 Page 72 of 100 WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for subdivision approval per Pasco Municipal Code Section 26.04.115(B) and Section 3.07.160. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the property owner/developer must pay a water right fee in lieu thereof. The Public Works Director may waive the fee if the developer mixes a soil additive in the ground that provides 30% retention of irrigation water. In this case there are no water rights to deed to the City as a result the current fee will be required before a final plat is approved. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.110) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact": Prevent Overcrowding: With an average lot size of 9,131 square feet, the proposed development will address the overcrowding concern by providing manageable lots and usable open spaces. R -1-A zoning requires a 20 -foot front yard setback, five-foot side yard setbacks and a rear yard equal to or greater than the height of the house. Parks Opens Space/Schools: The proposed plat is located within a half of a mile from Kurtzman Park and within approximately one mile from Highland Park. The developer will be required to pay the current park fee prior to receiving building permits. The developer will be required to pay the current school impact fee prior to receiving building permits. The City is required by RCW 58.17.110 to make a finding that adequate provisions are being made to ameliorate the impacts of the proposed subdivision on the School District. At the request of the School District the City enacted a school impact fee in 2012. The imposition of this impact fee addresses the requirement to ensure there are adequate provisions for schools. A school impact fee in the amount of $4,700 will be charged for each new home at the time of building permit issuance. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The plat is laid out for low-density residential development consistent with residential development of the initial phases of Sunrise Estates. The site is surrounded by several vacant parcels. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The Plat will connect to the community through the existing network of streets. Sidewalks are installed at the time homes are built on individual lots. The sidewalks will be constructed to current City standards and to the standards of the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ADA ramps at the corners of each intersection will be installed with the construction of the road improvements. 3 Page 73 of 100 Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: All lots within the plat will be provided with water, sewer and other utilities. Provision of Housing for State Residents: The proposed preliminary plat contains 31 building lots, providing opportunities for the construction of 31 new homes for Pasco residents. Adequate Air and Light: The maximum lot coverage limitation of 40 percent and building setbacks will assure adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The access streets will be paved and developed to City standards to assure that proper access is maintained to each lot. The discussion under safe travel above applies to this section also. Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is designated for single-family and mixed -residential development. Policies of the Comprehensive Plan suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing for residents. Other Findings: • The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Area Boundary. • The State Growth Management Act requires urban growth and urban densities to occur within Urban Growth Boundaries. • The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for single-family and mixed - residential development • The site is currently zoned R -1-A (Low -Density Residential Alternate). • The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of a variety of residential densities and housing types. • Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Addition the proposed subdivision, when fully developed, will generate approximately 310 vehicle trips per day. • RCW 58.17.110 requires the City to make a finding that adequate provisions have been made for schools before any preliminary plat is approved. • The City of Pasco has adopted a school impact fee ordinance compelling new housing developments to provide the School District with mitigation fees. The fee was effective April 16, 2012. • Past correspondence from the Pasco School District indicates impact fees address the requirement to ensure adequate provisions are made for schools. • There are no water rights associated with lieu of dedication of water rights will be approval. 4 this plat therefor a payment in required to receive final plat Page 74 of 100 CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed Plat the Planning Commission must develop Findings of Fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the Pasco Municipal Code and the standard specifications of the City Engineering Division. These standards for streets, sidewalks, and other infrastructure improvements were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and the provision for dedication of right-of-way. The preliminary plat was forwarded to the Franklin County PUD, the Pasco School District, Cascade Gas, Charter Cable and Ben -Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. The PUD requested easements along the front of all lots for utility service. Based on the School Districts Capital Facilities Plan the City collects school mitigation fees for each new dwelling unit. The fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The school impact fee addresses the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed plat makes efficient use of vacant land and will provide for additional housing within the City. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates much of the site for mixed - residential development. Single-family homes are identified as one of the permitted residential uses within the mixed residential designation. Plan Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community while Plan Policy H -1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; 5 Page 75 of 100 Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and Findings of Fact. The Findings of Fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations provided certain mitigation measures (i.e. school impact fees, and park fees) are included in approval conditions. (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. If approved the proposed plat will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to insure the health, safety and general welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this Plat. These factors will insure the public use and interest are served. PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. At the time lots are developed, all abutting roads and utilities shall be installed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This includes, but is not limited to water, sewer and irrigation lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps must be completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. All proposed utilities must be installed underground by the developer at the developer's expense. 2. The developer must comply with PMC 26.04.115(B) and PMC 3.07.160 dealing with water rights acquisition. 3. No utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed at street intersections. 4. Lots 8, 10 & 15 shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s) as lots that present difficulties for the placement of front yard fencing. 5. All storm water is to be disposed of per City and State codes and requirements. 6. The developer shall insure active and ongoing dust, weed and litter abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision and construction of dwellings thereon. The developer shall not place construction refuse upon adjoining parcels. C Page 76 of 100 7. The developer shall prepare a dust, weed and erosion control plan to be approved by the City prior to approval of any construction drawings for the first phase of the subdivision. 8. The developer shall be responsible for the creation of record drawings. All record drawings shall be created in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Record Drawing Requirements and Procedure form provided by the Engineering Division. This form shall be signed by the developer prior to construction plan approval. 9. All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat(s) drawings shall utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum and shall be identified on each such submittal. 10. The final plat(s) shall contain a 10-foot utility easement parallel to all streets unless otherwise required by the Franklin County PUD. 11. The final plat(s) shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this Plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat". 12. Street lighting must be installed to the City of Pasco/Franklin County PUD standards and as directed by the City Engineer. Residential street lights are typically installed every 300 feet, and collector/ arterial type street lights are typically installed every 150 feet. Street light positioning is alternating and is measured along the centerline of the road. 13. Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review the developer must enter into a Storm Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer will be responsible for obtaining the signatures of all parties required on the agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the agreement must be presented to the City of Pasco at the intake meeting for construction plans. 14. The developer will be required to conform to all conditions set forth in the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement including, but not limited to, regular cleaning and maintenance of all streets, gutters, catch basins and catch basin protection systems. Cleaning shall occur on a regular basis to ensure that no excess buildup of sand, trash, grass clippings, weeds or other debris occurs in any portion of the streets, gutters, or storm water collection facilities. Cleaning and upkeep of the streets, gutters, and storm water collection facilities must be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer will be responsible for operating and maintaining the storm drain system in accordance with the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement. 15. The developer will be required to comply with the City of Pasco Civil Plan Review process. 7 Page 77 of 100 16. The developer/ builder shall pay the City a "common area maintenance fee" of $275 per lot upon issuance of building permits for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to finance the maintenance of arterial boulevard strips. 17. The developer/ builder shall pay the "school impact fee" and "park fee" established by ordinance at the time of issuance of building permits for homes. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 15, 2015 staff report. MOTION: I move based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Sunrise Estates Division II with conditions as listed in the October 15, 2015 staff report. k, s Page 78 of 100 Planning Commission Minutes 9/17/2015 C. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat for Sunrise Estates, Division II (Juan Ochoa) IMF#PP2015-0021 Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Shane O'Neill, Planner I, discussed the application for a preliminary plat at Sunrise Estates, Division II. This site is a remaining portion of Sunrise Estates which has already been platted and approved, however, the current phases were not completed within the last 10 years. The preliminary plat has expired for the remaining 31 lots. The zoning has already been set as R -1-A (Low Density Residential). The minimum lot sizes are 7,200 square feet. The surrounding land uses are mostly vacant but there are a few residential developments nearby to the west and in the existing portion of Sunrise Estates. Utilities will need to be extended to the site. The sewer line has already been installed for a portion. The conditions contained in the staff report are typical of most plats. Juan Ochoa, 812 S. Myrtle Avenue, spoke on behalf of his preliminary plat application. This plat was started years ago but the developer did not finish it and he purchased the land a few months ago with the intent to finish it with the same plans as the original developer. Commissioner Greenaway asked if there was anything in the proposed conditions that caused any problems. Mr. Ochoa responded that he was fine with everything. Commissioner Bachart asked the applicant if he was looking to build homes fairly quickly. Mr. Ochoa answered that he is hoping to start developing the property within a year. Jose Zepeda, 403 S. Cedar Avenue, stated that his property borders this proposed site and wanted to know if there was going to be a cul-de-sac or a different way out that would go past his property. Staff pulled up the proposed preliminary plat on the overhead which showed that there would be a cul-de-sac. Mr. Zepeda was fine with the cul-de-sac. His only other concern was that when the previous phase was built, the contractors used part of his property as a Page 79 of 100 "dump" site for leftover sod, rock and concrete that he has to go pick up and haul off of his property. Chairwoman Polk responded that they are not supposed to do that so the Code Enforcement Division could get involved if that becomes an issue. Mr. Zepeda said that the issue with involving Code Enforcement is that he isn't always aware of who is doing the dumping since he is away from home when it happens. Commissioner Khan suggested Staff address that concern. Dave McDonald, City Planner, responded that there is a condition that addresses blowing dust and litter. Language could be added to include construction debris and when the project is built they can emphasize with the builder to be aware and not dump. Mr. Ochoa responded that every lot in the first phase has been completed. Commissioner Greenaway clarified that Mr. Zepeda is just concerned that when the builders are done with this next phase that when the contractors have leftover materials it will be dumped onto his property. She asked Mr. Ochoa if this problem would be taken care of and the builders will not leave their "garbage" in his backyard. Mr. Ochoa agreed with Commissioner Greenaway. Commissioner Bowers asked staff where Phase I is located and for clarification as to where Mr. Zepeda's property is located. Mr. McDonald responded that it is directly below the proposed plat. He referenced a map on the overhead. Mr. Zepeda also pointed out where his property is located. With no further questions or comments the public hearing closed. Commissioner Khan moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the October 15, 2015 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Page 80 of 100 Planning Commission Minutes 10/15/2015 B. Preliminary Plat Preliminary Plat for Sunrise Estates, Division II (Juan Ochoa) IMF#PP2015-0021 Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Shane O'Neill, Planner I, discussed the preliminary plat application for Sunrise Estates, Division II. He stated that the only changes to the staff report from the previous meeting was language added to Condition #6 to address debris and other dumping of trash or supplies because of a concern addressed by a citizen during the public hearing. Commissioner Bachart moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 15, 2015 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Bachart moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the city Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Sunrise Estates, Division II with conditions as listed in the October 15, 2015 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Page 81 of 100 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 26, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Regular Meeting: 11/2/15 Rick White, Director Community & Economic Development FROM: Jeff Adams, Associate Planner Community & Economic Development SUBJECT: Special Permit: Location of a Church in a C-3 District (MF# SP 2015-010) I. REFERENCE(S): Vicinity Map Proposed Resolution Planning Commission Report Planning Commission Minutes: 9/17/2015 and 10/15/2015 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , a resolution granting a special permit for a church in a C-3 (General Business) Zone at 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite D, as recommended by the Planning Commission. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: On September 17, 2015 the Planning Commission held a public hearing to determine whether or not to recommend approval of a special permit to allow the location of a church at 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite D. Following conduct of the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended the church in question be granted a special permit with a number of conditions. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached resolution. Page 82 of 100 No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received. V. DISCUSSION: Page 83 of 100 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A CHURCH IN A C-3 (GENERAL BUSINESS) ZONE. WHEREAS, Tiempos de Poder Church submitted an application for the location of a church at 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite D (Tax Parcel 119 461 100); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 17, 2015 to review special permit renewal for Tiempos de Poder Church; and, WHEREAS, following deliberations on October 15, 2015 the Planning Commission recommended approval of a Special Permit for the church with certain conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: 1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to Tiempos de Poder Church for the location of a church in a C-3 (General Business) District under Master File # SP2015-010 with the following conditions: a) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; b) If any tenant improvements occur in the space leased to the church, they will be required to comply with all requirements of the International Building Code for an "A" occupancy prior to occupancy by the church; c) The storefront appearance of the leased space shall not be altered except as needed to comply with Building Code exiting requirements; d) The building, including entrances and restrooms, must be ADA/handicap- compliant prior to occupancy by the church; e) The church shall not object to the transfer, renewal or issuance of a liquor license for an existing or new establishment within 1,000 feet of the property. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 2nd day of November, 2015. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Page 85 of 100 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2015-010 HEARING DATE: 9/17/2015 ACTION DATE: 10/15/2015 APPLICANT: Tiempos de Poder Church 2508 W Sylvester Ste. D Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Location of a Church in a C-3 District Legal: Parcel # 119 461 100: A Portion of the W1/2 of the NE'/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SEI/4, of Section 25 Township 9 Range 29; General Location: 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite D. Property Size: Approximately .82 acres (35,785 square feet) 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Sylvester Street. 3. UTILITIES: The site is served by municipal water and sewer. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-3 (General Business). Surrounding properties are zoned C-1, C-3 and R-4 and are fully developed. NORTH: C-1 - Commercial SOUTH: C-3 - Storage EAST: R-4 - Apartments WEST: R-4 - Apartments 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for commercial uses. The Plan does not specifically address churches, but elements of the Plan encourage the promotion of orderly development including the development of zoning standards for off-street parking and other development standards. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non -Significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. ANALYSIS On July 17, 2015 Ministerio Apostolico Y Profetico Tiempos De Poder (Ministry of the Apostolic and Prophetic Time of Power) applied for an occupancy permit Page 86 of 100 for a church in a C-3 Zoning district. The application was placed on hold with the notation that a Special Permit is required for all churches as per PMC 25.86. The church subsequently applied for a Special Permit on August 8, 2015. The application involves the use of one of six suites in the Ryder's West mini - mall for church activities. The mini -mall contains 5,800 square feet of floor space. The church has signed a lease for 940 square feet in Suite D near the middle of the mini -mall. The proposed church location has parking to the north, east, and west of the building. The mini -mall was built in 1972 for retail commercial purposes. The six suites are currently occupied with an accounting and tax firm, a Washington Unions office, a tax service and a Piano Service. The suite in question was previously occupied by the Teamsters Union local 839 up to 2007, and is currently vacant. The church plans to hold services for approximately 30 people for about 6 hour a week, on Sundays, Wednesdays, & Fridays, 2 hours per day. The maximum occupancy for the suite is 135 people, not counting restroom space and other ancillary uses. The mini -mall was constructed to meet Building Code requirements for retail activities. Places of religious worship are classified in the Building Code as "A" occupancies. When a building is changed from one occupancy class to another (from an "M" [Mercantile] to an "A" [Assembly] for example) the building is required to meet life/safety standards required for the new occupancy classification. However, due to the size of the building no building modifications would be required in order to meet the "A" occupancy requirements. One concern with a church locating in a commercial area is the fact that some retail establishments or restaurants sell or serve liquor. The issue is typically addressed by placing a condition on the Special Permit approval restricting the church's ability to object to a liquor license. FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Churches are unclassified uses requiring review through the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district. 2 Page 87 of 100 2. The proposed church site is zoned C-3. 3. The proposed site is located at 2508 W Sylvester Street, Ste. D. 4. The property is currently occupied with office and retail uses. 5. The site was originally developed as a mini -mall. 6. The mini -mall contains 5,800 square feet of floor area. 7. The church has signed a lease for 940 square feet of floor space. 8. The maximum occupancy for 940 square feet (excluding restrooms) is 135 people. 9. Churches are classified as "A" occupancy under the International Building Code, which differs from the original occupancy of the structure. However no building modifications would be required for such a small space. 10. The Municipal Code (PMC 25.78.170) requires one off-street parking space for every 10 lineal feet of bench (pew) seating or one space for every 4 chairs in a church. 11. The church plans to hold services for approximately 30 people for about 6 hour a week, on Sundays, Wednesdays, 8v Fridays; 2 hours/day. 12. Based on 940 square feet (assuming no restroom space or ancillary uses) the maximum occupancy loading would be 135 people, requiring 34 parking spaces. 13. Parking areas are located to the north, east and west of the proposed church location with 48 shared parking spaces for the mini -mall. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE INITIAL FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 and determine whether or not the proposal: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? 3 Page 88 of 100 The Plan does not specifically address churches, but elements of the Plan encourage the promotion of orderly development including the development of zoning standards for off-street parking and other development standards. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The mini -mall was designed to handle retail commercial traffic with an adequate parking lot and interior circulation. The proposed church will conduct services at times when other Mall traffic is generally low and utility usage is low (current uses on-site are also relatively low traffic). (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The proposed church will be located in the mini -mall and no exterior changes are planned for the building. The current store front character will be maintained. The intended character of the mini -mall is retail in nature. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof The proposed church will be located in part of the existing mini -mall and no structures will be built or added to the Mall. The site design will remain unchanged. The church will be paying market rent. The location of the church within the mini -mall will occupy space intended for retail businesses. Allowing the church to be located in the mini -mall on a long- term basis may discourage the development/ location of commercial enterprises within the mini -mall. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The church will generate no more dust, vibrations, flashing lights or fumes than would be expected by permitted retail uses of the zoning district. Traffic generated by the church will occur mostly on Sunday mornings when mall traffic is minimal. Small weekly meetings will generate minimal traffic on other days of the week. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? 4 Page 89 of 100 Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do not endanger public health or safety and are generally not nuisance generators. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; 2) If any tenant improvements occur in the space leased to the church, they will be required to comply with all requirements of the International Building Code for an "A" occupancy prior to occupancy by the church; 3) The storefront appearance of the leased space shall not be altered except as needed to comply with Building Code exiting requirements; 4) The building, including entrances and restrooms, must be ADA/handicap-compliant prior to occupancy by the church; 5) The church shall not object to the transfer, renewal or issuance of a liquor license for an existing or new establishment within 1,000 feet of the property. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 15, 2015 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Ministerio Apostolico Y Profetico Tiempos de Poder for the location of a church at 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite D with the conditions as contained in the October 15, 2015 staff report. 5 Page 90 of 100 Land Use Item: Tiemwos de Poder Church in C-3 Applicant: amon Vera Map File #: SP 2015-010 Commercial N Commercial SYLVESTER ST SFDUs �n SITE _ ■ � N }i E E l a� M ■ E E V Mini- -W�. Cn Storage SFDU Condos Apartments Zoning Item: Tiemwos de Poder Church in C-3 Applicant:amon Vera Map File #: SP 2015-010 w Q N C-3 C-1 C-1 C-3 R-4 C-1 SYLVE SITE C-3 R-4 R-4 Looking Nortif ! ,;L.i -ei ,.l : i.:. `..�' �,�J er�,��/+-7r- � s t�y"'T�� s�'°'.c. �t 7+'�r � k +f:' xr •� .a � � - � a. � �C.." �' `ta. �, _'L�3 �..:._ x �_� '¢-��.± �.�;, ryi•- > > �- � � s�.- •. t '� � * rs �� a � � '� i -e Kk1�.:: -w � _": y� -�t3�' � � x�a.,": � 'r �- „`;ice � � : - 5 -_ ,w7-'� i� •'ra .�'�'1{�� .�c��`i s� - .['�? �-'✓1.'.S"�aS�=$� � � �., s't�'a� ' ~ i�%.-'�F"�z9�' '' ''"'�.+ti�:.�.:� `_ L`�'"�i�'�`�'E.�R�i'�.�.a.• �°`� ,kyr �f.�y'�'c-"�+': �. �.� w L-.. ~3 ,r,�zsa--.- _i�'!..,k•.:,.�..� a ,.�YC.��fae _.ctr...k.'.. '� �--. � _ .ate`.; r*." -,N, a"S_�:7a �C.'.c:.�e.�-a_;,«.�+s''�"r:�3ar �pt •*=7; f .� �•� �;z,-ti S e ti _ w -------------- 000 r 3 Looking South I �� << ,. 1 � -_ -_ _. 1 � � � - _ alb!_ �-ervtt� '-' 35.4042 Site PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 9/17/2015 B. Special Permit Location of a church in a C-3 (General Business) Zone (Tiempos de Poder Church) (MF# SP 2015-010) Chairwoman Polk read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Jeff Adams, Associate Planner, discussed the special permit application for the location of a church in a C-3 (General Business) Zone. The building is surrounded by an accounting firm, a Union's Office, a piano service and tax service so there would be very low traffic uses from the surrounding area. The applicant stated that they wish to have up to 30 people at this location. The suite has a maximum occupancy of 135 so their requested use is well under the occupancy limit. They plan to meet Sunday's, Wednesday's and Friday's for approximately 2 hours per session. Due to the size of the building there will be no modifications required for the upgrade from an "M" occupancy to an "A" occupancy. Mr. Adams briefly went over the conditions in the staff report. Commissioner Portugal asked for clarification on a restroom facility. Mr. Adams answered that there is a restroom facility onsite. Francier Obando Pinillo, 2508 W. Sylvester, spoke on behalf of his special permit application. Jose Montalvo, 2700 E. `A' Street translated for Mr. Pinillo. They stated that they liked this location because it is between two apartment complexes and they were borrowing another church. This will give them a chance to spread hope in this community. Mr. Pinillo briefly discussed the types of activities and uses that they will use in the facility. Commissioner Greenway asked the applicant if he had problems with any of the conditions. Mr. Pinillo responded no. Commissioner Bowers asked where the members currently meet. Dave McDonald, City Planner, replied that they are currently already meeting in the building. With no further questions or comments the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Khan moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact, and development of a recommendation for City Council for the October 15, 2015 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. -1- Page 99 of 100 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 10/15/2015 A. Special Permit Location of a church in a C-3 (General Business) Zone (Tiempos de Poder Church) (MF# SP 2015-010) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Dave McDonald, City Planner, discussed the special permit for the location of a church in a C-3 (General Business) Zone. There were no changes to the staff report since the previous meeting. Commissioner Polk moved, seconded by Commissioner Bachart, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the October 15, 2015 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Polk moved, seconded by Commissioner Bachart, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Ministerio Apostolico Y Profetico Tiermpos de Poder for the location of a church at 2508 W Sylvester Street, Suite D with the conditions as contained in the October 15, 2015 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. -1- Page 100 of 100