HomeMy WebLinkAboutHDR Load Rating RD 44 and RD 100 & FCID CanalORIGINAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
Load Rating Analysis for Three Bridges
Road 44 & FCID Canal
Road 100 & FCID Canal
Tacoma Avenue & Lewis Street
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the City of Pasco, a Washington
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and HDR Engineering, Inc., hereinafter
referred to as "Consultant."
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City desires to have certain services and/or tasks performed as set forth
below requiring specialized skills, training, equipment, and other supportive capabilities; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant represents that it is qualified and possesses sufficient skills,
experience, equipment, and necessary capabilities, including: technical and professional
expertise, when required, to perform the services and/or tasks as set forth in this Agreement upon
which the City is relying.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, and performances
contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Scone of Services. The Consultant shall perform such services and accomplish such
tasks, including the furnishing of all labor, materials, facilities and equipment necessary
for full performance thereof, as identified and designated as Consultant's Responsibilities
throughout this Agreement, and as more particularly described in Scope of Work detailed
in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Project").
2. Term. This Project shall begin on June 1, 2015, and promptly be completed within thirty
(30) calendar days, in accordance with the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3. Compensation and Payment.
3.1 Payment for services provided hereunder shall be made following the
performance of such services. Such payment shall be full compensation for work
performed or services rendered, and for all labor, materials, supplies, equipment,
and incidentals necessary to complete the Project.
3.2 No payment shall be made for any services rendered by the Consultant except for
services identified and set forth in this Agreement except as may be authorized by
a written supplemental agreement approved by the City.
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 1 of 9
3.3 The City shall pay the Consultant for work performed under this Agreement upon
timely submitted invoices detailing work performed and expenses for which
reimbursement is sought. The City shall approve all invoices before payment is
issued. Payment shall occur within thirty (30) days of receipt and approval of an
invoice.
3.4 The City shall pay the Consultant for all work performed and expenses incurred
under this Agreement, as follows.
❑ Hourly (Single Rate): $ per hour plus actual expenses
incurred as provided under this Agreement, but not to exceed a total of
$ without prior written authorization by the City, or
® Hourly (Multiple Rate): Such rates as identified on Exhibit A, plus actual
expenses incurred as provided under this Agreement, but not to exceed a
total of $24,723.92 without the prior written authorization by the City; or
❑ Fixed Sum: A total of $ ; or
❑ Other:
4. Reports and Inspections.
4.1 The Consultant at such times and in such forms as the City may require, shall
furnish to the City such statements, records, studies, surveys, reports, data, and
information as the City may request pertaining to matters covered by this
Agreement.
4.2 The Consultant shall, at any time during normal business hours and as often as the
City or the Washington State Auditor may reasonably deem necessary, make
available for examination all of its records and data with respect to all matters
covered, directly or indirectly, by this Agreement and shall permit the City, or its
designated authorized representative to audit and inspect other data relating to all
matters covered by this Agreement. The City shall receive a copy of all audit
reports made by the agency or firm as to the Consultant's activities. The City
may, at its discretion, conduct an audit at its expense, using its own or outside
auditors, of the Consultant's activities which relate, directly or indirectly, to this
Agreement. Consultant shall be provided a copy of such reports.
4.3 The Consultant, during the term of this Agreement, shall obtain all permits and
registration documents necessary for the performance of its work and for the
execution of services at its own expense, and shall maintain its validity. Upon
request, the Consultant shall deliver to the City copies of these licenses,
registration documents, and permits or proof of their issuance or renewal.
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 2 of 9
4.4 Consultant shall maintain books, records and documents, which sufficiently and
properly reflect all direct and indirect costs related to the performance of this
Agreement, and shall maintain such accounting procedures and practices as may
be necessary to assure proper accounting of all funds paid pursuant to this
Agreement. These records shall be subject, at all reasonable rimes, to inspection,
review, or audit as provided above.
4.5 The Consultant shall retain all books, records, documents or other material
relevant to this Agreement for three (3) years after its expiration. Consultant
agrees that the City, or its designee, shall have full access and right to examine
any of said materials at all reasonable times during this period.
5. Ownership and Use of Documents.
5.1 All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data, information, drawings . and
documents made, collected, or prepared by the Consultant for performing the
services subject to this Agreement, as well as any final product, collectively
referred to as "work product," shall be deemed as the exclusive property of the
City, including copyright as secured thereon. Consultant may not use them except
in connection with the performance of the services under this Agreement or with
the prior written consent of the City. Any prior copyrighted materials owned by
the Consultant and utilized in the performance of the services under this
Agreement, or embedded in with the materials, products and services provided
thereunder, shall remain the property of the Consultant subject to a license
granted to the City for their continued use of the products and services provided
under this Agreement. Any work product used by the Consultant in the
performance of these services which it deems as "confidential," "proprietary," or
a "trade secret" shall be conspicuously designated as such.
5.2 In the event of Consultant's default, or in the event that this Agreement is
terminated prior to its completion, the work product of the Consultant, along with
a summary of the services performed to date of default or termination, shall
become the property of the City, and tender of the work product and summary
shall be a prerequisite to final payment under this Agreement. The summary of
services provided shall be prepared at no additional cost, if the Agreement is
terminated through default by the Consultant. If the Agreement is terminated
through convenience by the City, the City agrees to pay Consultant for the
preparation of the summary of services provided.
6. Public Records.
6.1 Consultant acknowledges that the City is an agency subject to Chapter 42.56
RCW "Public Records Act." All preliminary drafts or notes prepared or gathered
by the Consultant, and recommendations of the Consultant are exempt prior to the
acceptance by the City or public citation by the City in connection with City
action.
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 3 of 9
6.2 If the Consultant becomes a custodian of public records of the City and request
for such records is received by the City, the Consultant shall respond to the
request by the City for such records within five (5) business days by either
providing the records, or by identifying in writing the additional time necessary to
provide the records with a description of the reasons why additional time is
needed. Such additional time shall not exceed twenty (20) business days unless
extraordinary good cause is shown.
6.3 In the event the City receives a public records request for protected work product
of the Consultant within its possession, the City shall, prior to the release of any
protected work product or as a result of a public records request or subpoena,
provide Consultant at least ten (10) business days prior written notice of the
pending release and to reasonably cooperate with any legal action which may be
initiated by the Consultant to enjoin or otherwise prevent such release.
7. Independent Contractor Relationship.
7.1 The parties intend that an independent contractor relationship is created by this
Agreement. The City is interested primarily in the results to be achieved; subject
to the scope of services and the specific requirements of this Agreement, the
implementation of services will lie solely with the discretion of the Consultant.
No agent, employee, officer or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed to
be an employee, agent, officer, or representative of the City for any purpose, and
the employees of the Consultant are not entitled to any of the benefits or
privileges the City provides for its employees. The Consultant will be solely and
entirely responsible for its acts and for the acts of its agents, employees, officers,
subcontractors or representatives during the performance of this Agreement.
7.2 In the performance of the services provided in this Agreement, Consultant is an
independent contractor with full authority to control and direct the performance of
the details of the work, however, the results of the work contemplated herein must
meet the approval of the City and shall be subject to the City's general rights of
inspection and review to secure the satisfactory completion thereof.
7.3 The Consultant shall comply with all State and Federal laws including, but not
limited to:
7.3.1 The definition requirements of RCW 50.04.140 (Employment Security).
7.3.2 RCW 51.08.195 (Industrial Insurance).
7.3.3 Obtain a City of Pasco business license.
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 4 of 9
7.4 The City may, at its sole discretion, require the Consultant to remove any
employee, agent or servant from employment on this Project who, in the City's
sole discretion, may be detrimental to the City's interest.
8. Indemnification.
8.1 The Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
officials, agents, employees, and volunteers from any and all claims and causes of
action, including, but not limited to, actions of law or administrative proceedings
for all injuries to persons or damages to property, and all losses, damages,
demands, suits, judgments, including attorney fees, arising out of, or as a result
of, or in connection with the work performed under this Agreement, and caused or
occasioned in whole or in part by reason of errors, negligent acts or omissions of
the Consultant or its subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement, except
for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City, its officers,
employees, agents, and volunteers.
8.2 Should a Court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject
to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily
injuries or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent
negligence of the Consultant, and the City, its officers, employees, agents and
volunteers, the Consultant's liability and obligation to defend hereunder shall only
be the proportionate extent of the Consultant's negligence.
8.3 It is further agreed that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the
Consultant's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW,
solely for the purposes of this indemnification.
8.4 No liability shall attach to the City by reason of entering into this Agreement
except as expressly provided herein.
8.5 This indemnification shall include damages, penalties and attorney fees sustained
as a result of Consultant's delayed or failed performance of Section 6 above.
8.6 This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties, and the provisions of this
section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.
9. Insurance. The Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the
Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which
may arise from or in connection with the perfonnance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.
9.1 Minimum Scone of Insurance. Consultant shall obtain insurance of the types
described below:
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 5 of 9
9.1.1 Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non -owned, hired and
leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office
(ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability
coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual
liability coverage.
9.1.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written on ISO
occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises,
operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising
injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Consultant's
Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work
performed for the City.
9.1.3 Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance
laws of the State of Washington.
9.1.4 Professional Liability insurance appropriate to the Consultant's profession.
9.2 Minimum Amounts of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain the following
insurance limits:
9.2.1 Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for
bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident.
9.2.2 Commercial General Liability insurance shall be written with limits no
less than:
❑ $1,000,000 each occurrence;
❑ $2,000,000 general aggregate; or
® $1,000,000 each occurrence; and $2,000,000 general aggregate
9.2.3 Professional Liability insurance shall be written with limits no less than:
® $1,000,000 per claim;
❑ $1,000,000 policy aggregate limit; or
❑ $ per claim; and $ per policy aggregate limit
9.3 Other Insurance Provisions. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed
to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability, Professional
Liability, and Commercial General Liability insurance:
9.3.1 The Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as
respects the City. Any insurance, self-insurance, or insurance pool
coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Consultant's
insurance and shall not contribute with it.
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 6 of 9
9.3.2 The Consultant's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall
not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written
notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the
City.
9.4 Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to placed with insurers with a current A.M.
Best rating of not less than A:VII.
9.5 Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original
certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not
necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the
insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work.
10. Nondiscrimination. In the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant will not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the grounds of race,
creed, color, national origin, sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory,
mental or physical handicap; provided that the prohibition against discrimination in
employment because of handicap shall not apply if the particular disability prevents the
proper performance of the particular worker involved. The Consultant shall ensure that
applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment in the
performance of this Agreement without discrimination because of their race, creed, color,
national origin, sex, marital status, age or the presence of any sensory, mental or physical
handicap. Consultant shall take such action with respect to this Agreement as may be
required to ensure full compliance with local, State and Federal laws prohibiting
discrimination in employment.
11. Covenant Against Contingent Fees. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed
nor retained any company, firm, or person, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement; and that it has not paid
or agreed to pay any company, person or firm, other than a bona fide employee working
exclusively for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or
other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this
Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement.
12. Assignment and Subcontracting.
12.1 The City has awarded this Agreement to the Consultant due to its unique
qualifications to perform these services. The Consultant shall not assign (or
subcontract other than as specifically identified in Exhibit A) its performance
under this Agreement or any portions of this Agreement without the prior written
consent of the City, which consent must be sought at least thirty (30) days prior to
the date of any proposed assignment.
12.2 Any work or services assigned or subcontracted hereunder shall be subject to each
provision of this Agreement including Section 6, Public Records; Section 10,
Nondiscrimination; proper bidding procedures where applicable; and all local,
State and Federal statutes, ordinances and guidelines.
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 7 of 9
12.3 Any technical or professional service subcontract not listed in this Agreement,
must have prior written approval by the City.
13. Termination.
13.1 Termination for Convenience. Either party may terminate this Agreement for any
reason upon giving the other party no less than ten (10) business days written
notice in advance of the effective date of such termination.
13.2 Termination for Cause. If the Consultant fails to perform in the manner called for
in this Agreement, or if the Consultant fails to comply with any other provisions
of this Agreement and fails to correct such noncompliance within five (5)
business days of written notice thereof, the City may terminate this Agreement for
cause. Termination shall be effected by serving a notice of termination on the
Consultant setting forth the manner in which the Consultant is in default. The
Consultant will only be paid for services and expenses complying with the terms
of this Agreement, incurred prior to termination.
14. General Provisions.
14.1 For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
14.2 Notice. Notice provided for in this Agreement shall be sent by:
14.2.1 Personal service upon the Project Administrators.
14.2.2 Certified mail to the physical address of the parties, or by electronic
transmission to the e-mail addresses designated for the parties below.
14.3 The Project Administrator for the purpose of this Agreement shall be:
14.3.1 For the City: Ahmad Qayoumi, or his/her designee
Public Works Director
525 North 3'
PO Box 293
Pasco WA 99301
gayoumia(( Pasco-wa.gov (e-mail address)
14.3.2 For the Consultant: Jeremy Miles, or his/her designee
HDR Engineering, Inc.
2805 Saint Andrews Loop, Suite A
Pasco, WA 99301-6121
Jeremy.Miles@HDRinc.com (e-mail address)
15. Dispute Resolution.
15.1 This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and entered
into and delivered within the State of Washington and it is agreed by each party
hereto that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
Washington.
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 8 of 9
15.2 In the event of a dispute regarding the enforcement, breach, default, or
interpretation of this Agreement, the Project Administrators, or their designees,
shall first meet in a good faith effort to resolve such dispute. In the event the
dispute cannot be resolved by agreement of the parties, said dispute shall be
resolved by arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, with both parties
waiving the right of a jury trial upon trial de novo, with venue placed in Pasco,
Franklin County, Washington. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled
to its reasonable attorney fees and costs as additional award and judgment against
the other.
16. Nonwaiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other
similar event or other provision of this Agreement.
17. Integration. This Agreement between the parties consists in its entirety of this document
and any exhibits, schedules or attachments verified by initials as a part of Exhibit A. Any
modification of this Agreement or change order affecting this Agreement shall be in
writing and signed by both parties.
18. Authorization. By signature below, each party warrants that they are authorized and
empowered to execute this Agreement binding the City and the Consultant respectively.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the —L_ day of Skne/ 2015.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
�r
Da Zab anager
ATEST:
""10
De bie Clark, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CONSULTANT
J� f `i--�j�-�ca�ifn��
Le . Ken, City Attorney
A4Y
Professional Services Agreement- Consultant Name
Project Name Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT A
LOAD RATING ANALYSIS FOR THREE BRIDGES:
Road 44 & FCID Canal
Road 100 & FCID Canal
Tacoma Avenue & Lewis Street
SCOPE OF WORK
Summary
This scope of work is for HDR Engineering, Inc. (Consultant) to support the City of Pasco (City) in
performing the load rating of three bridges, including: Road 44 & FCID Canal, Road 100 & FCID
Canal and the Tacoma Avenue & Lewis Street. The bridges will be load rated using the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) BRIDG software. A detailed Bridge
Load Rating Report will be prepared for each bridge. A site visit will also be conducted to verify
the information shown in the as -built plans and current inspection report.
This task is anticipated to be completed within 30 Calendar days of receiving written Notice to
Proceed (NTP) from the City, provided no additional scope items are identified and requested.
Task 1 Project Management
This task includes work required to administer the Consultant contract including project initiation,
managing scope, schedule and budget, providing progress reports and invoices, and monitoring
QA/QC process. Also includes any required coordination with WSDOT Local Agency Bridge
Engineer and Load Rating Engineer.
Task 1 Assumptions:
• Two (2) months are assumed for progress reporting and invoicing. No status update
reports beyond the monthly progress report are assumed. Additional time may be
required depending on City feedback or for other unforeseen reasons.
Task 1 Deliverables:
• A hardcopy and electronic copy of the monthly invoice and progress report.
Task 2 Review of Existing Bridge Information and Site Visit
Task 2.1 Review Existing Bridge Information
The Consultant will review plans, inspection reports, photos, and other data provided to the
Consultant by the City for use in rating the Bridge.
Task 2.1 Assumptions:
• The City will provide the following:
o Record drawings of the bridge as available
o Current Bridge Inspection Report(s)
CITY OF PASCO- LOAD RATINGS
o Available digital photos of the bridge
o Existing load rating report if available
Task 2.2 Site Visit and Findings Documentation
The Consultant will perform a site visit to all three bridges to supplement and verify information
shown in the as -built plans and current inspection report. The Consultant will inform the City of
any major discrepancies between the site visit and the inspection report.
Task 2.2 Assumptions:
• Site visit to verify as -built information is limited to items readily visible and accessible
without special equipment (lift or U -bit) or ladders. No traffic control measures are
required.
• Site visit will be performed by HDR Project Manager with assistance from an Engineer
in the Pasco office.
• Cost includes travel to and from the Spokane office for the HDR Project Manager.
• Assume 1 hour required at each bridge to verify as -built information.
• Assume 3 hours to document and compile notes for submission to City.
Task 2 Deliverables:
• The Consultant will provide the City with any noted modifications to as -built drawings
and photographs as a result of the site visit (electronic copy)
Task 3 Bridge Load Rating and Report
The Consultant will perform a load rating of Road 44 & FCID Canal, Road 100 & FCID Canal and
the Tacoma Avenue & Lewis Street bridges. The work completed under this task will include the
following items for each bridge:
• Prepare required supplemental load or geometry calculations and rate the bridge using the
WSDOT BRIDG load rating program.
• Compile and tabulate all data and identify critical values for use in development of the
Load Rating Report.
• Prepare a final report to document and summarize the findings. The report will include a
bridge rating summary sheet identifying the critical load rating summary for the bridge, an
introduction, evaluation of results and recommendations. The report will also include a
bridge description, a discussion of the load rating criteria and modeling analysis.
• Perform a detailed check of the Bridge Load Rating to verify assumptions, calculations,
modeling, load application, and results.
• Conduct an internal quality assurance / quality control review of the Bridge Load Rating
Report prior to its submittal to the City. The review will be documented in accordance with
HDR QA/QC procedures.
Task 3.1 Load Rate Road 44 & FCID Canal Bridge
The Consultant will perform a load rating of the Road 44 & FCID Canal Bridge.
CITY OF PASCO -LOAD RATINGS
Rate critical concrete girders using the software program BRIDG. Bridge was constructed
in 1977 and is a 36 -ft. wide simple span structure with a 24 -ft length comprised of nine (9)
4 ft. wide precast pre -stressed ribbed deck girders that are connected together with weld
ties and a cast -in-place (CIP) concrete shear key. There is a 6 -ft. wide CIP concrete
sidewalk on one side of the bridge and a 2 -ft. wide CIP concrete curb on the other side of
the bridge with an asphalt overlay topping the roadway. There is a steel post and
guardrail system attached to the exterior girder and sidewalk/curb. The bridge is
symmetrical about the centerline of the bridge.
a. Exterior girder - Curb: This exterior girder line will be rated. The exterior girder with
the 2 -ft. curb will be rated assuming it supports the curb load, the steel post and
guardrail system and tributary portion of asphalt overlay if applicable.
b. Exterior Girder - Sidewalk: The exterior girder with the 6 -ft. sidewalk will be rated
for an extreme event situation with a rating vehicle mounting the sidewalk.
Assume this girder also supports the sidewalk load and the steel post and guardrail
system.
c. Interior girder: One interior girder line will be rated. The interior girder will be rated
assuming it supports tributary portion of asphalt overlay.
Task 3.1 Assumptions:
• The sidewalk or curb load is assumed to be carried by only the girder that is
supporting the load and not distributed equally to all girders.
• Assume that a rating vehicle can mount the sidewalk for an extreme event, no
collapse criteria. This situation will be evaluated for operating level only and is not
included as part of the rating results.
• Pedestrian loads will not be considered for the load rating per Section 6A.6.2.3.4 of
the MBE.
• One girder -line analysis will be performed for each of the girders listed above. For
load rating modeling purposes in BRIDG the ribs of the girders will be combined into
one and the girder essentially rated as a Tee -beam.
Task 3.2 Load Rate Road 100 & FCID Canal Bridge
The Consultant will perform a load rating of the Road 100 & FCID Canal Bridge.
Rate critical concrete girders using the software program BRIDG. Bridge was constructed
in 1981 and is a 42 -ft. wide simple span structure with a 26 -ft. length comprised of precast
pre -stressed ribbed deck girders that are connected together with weld ties and a cast -in-
place (CIP) concrete shear key. CIP concrete barriers are attached to the exterior girders
with an asphalt overlay topping the roadway. The bridge girders are symmetrical about
the centerline of the bridge.
a. Exterior girder: One exterior girder line will be rated. The exterior girder will be
rated assuming it supports the concrete barrier load and tributary portion of asphalt
overlay.
b. Interior girder: One interior girder line will be rated. The interior girder will be rated
assuming it supports tributary portion of asphalt overlay.
CITY OF PASCO-LOAD RATINGS
Task 3.2 Assumptions:
• Central Premix will provide a copy of the shop drawings for this bridge once HDR is
under contract with the City. The City currently only has one general plan and layout
sheet for the bridge that does not provide adequate details to rate the structure.
• One girder -line analysis will be performed for each of the girders listed above. For
load rating modeling purposes in BRIDG the ribs of the girders will be combined into
one and the girder essentially rated as a Tee -beam.
Task 3.3 Load Rate Road Tacoma Ave. & Lewis St. Bridge
The Consultant will perform a load rating of the Tacoma Ave. & Lewis St. Bridge.
Rate concrete slab using the software program BRIDG. Bridge was constructed in 1937
and is a 28.5 -ft. wide simple span CIP concrete frame structure with a 29.3 -ft. out -to -out
length. There is a 6 -ft. wide sidewalk on one side of the structure that is integral with the
slab with the bottom of the slab stepping up to maintain same slab geometry. There is a
CIP concrete curb on the other side of the bridge and a CIP concrete architectural railing
on both sides of the structure. There is an asphalt overlay topping the roadway.
a. The rating evaluation is performed for a 1 -ft strip of top slab of the frame structure.
Task 3.3 Assumptions:
• Per discussion with the WSDOT Load Rating Engineer the walls are considered
substructure elements and will not be rated. There are no comments in the current
inspection report that suggests that the walls are showing signs of overstress that
warrants rating these elements.
• Assume the structure can be rated using BRIDG software. Alternate analysis
software and rating spreadsheets may be utilized to verify the results of BRIDG
program.
• The CIP curb, architectural railing and asphalt overlay is distributed equally over the
width of the slab/sidewalk.
• Assume that a rating vehicle can mount the sidewalk.
• Pedestrian loads will not be considered for the load rating per Section 6A.6.2.3.4 of
the MBE.
Task 3 General Rating Assumptions:
• The load rating analysis and calculations will be done in accordance with the following
documents:
o WSDOT Bridge Design Manual (version M 23-50.13, February 2014) (BDM)
o AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation (Second Edition, 2011) (MBE)
o AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Structures (17'" edition, 2002)
o FHWA Memorandum regarding Load Rating of Specialized Hauling Vehicles,
dated November 15, 2013.
• Bridges will be load rated using LFD procedures. Load Factor Ratings (LFR) will be in
compliance with the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Evaluation and the AASHTO
Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges 17th Edition, 2002.
CITY OF PASCO - LOAD RATINGS
• The bridges will be evaluated for the AASHTO legal trucks (Types, 3, 3S2, and 3-3),
Overload Trucks 1 & 2 and Notional Rating Load (NRL) truck. For the National
Bridge Inventory (NBI), inventory and operation evaluation, the evaluation will be
performed using the HS -20 truck load.
• If the operating rating factor for NRL is less than 1.0, the Consultant will perform
additional load rating analysis of the Specialized Hauling Vehicles (SHVs) as given in
MBE. See Task 4.
• WSDOT BRIDG rating software has been vetted and revised to adequately load rate
bridges. HDR will review input information and use engineering judgment to spot
check BRIDG results. However, this scope of services does not include a thorough
check on the accuracy of BRIDG computational methods and results.
• This scope of services does not include rating bridge substructure elements.
• The load rating submittal will include the following:
o A load rating summary sheet that summarizes the results, of the rating,
including: controlling rating factors, member(s), location(s), and whether shear
or moment controls for both inventory and operating levels for noted rating
vehicles. A list of critical assumptions for rating the bridge will also be
included on the summary sheet for each bridge.
o Brief one page report with a description of the bridge and an explanation for
. ratings that are less than 1.0. Plan drawings will also be submitted.
o Electronic copies of supplemental calculations and other supporting
documentation will also be submitted.
o The load rating submittal will also include electronic copies of the BRIDG input
and output files and other supplemental calculations.
• The bridge rating summary sheet will follow the format in the WSDOT Bridge Design
Manual (BDM) Appendix 13.4-A1 (for LFR rating method) and will be stamped,
signed, and dated by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Washington.
Task 3 Deliverables:
• Final Bridge Load Rating Report including computation files (BRIDG input and output,
Excel files, and hand calculations):
0 one (1) hard copy that includes: load rating summary sheet, one page report and
plan drawings
o electronic (PDF) copy on one (1) CD ROM that includes: load rating summary
sheet,, one page report, plan drawings, supplemental calculations and modeling
input and output files.
Task 4 Bridge Load Rating of SHVs (Optional)
In accordance with FHWA Memorandum dated November 15, 2013, if the Bridge's NRL rating is
less than 1.0, the single -unit SHVs, including SU4, SU5, SU6, and SU7 will also be considered in
the load rating analysis in accordance with Article 66.7.2 of the MBE, as described in Task 3, and
the results included in the Load Rating Report.
CITY OF PASCO- LOAD RATINGS
Task 4 Assumptions:
• Assume additional 10 hours per bridge to rate, compile data, perform detailed check
and include in load rating summary report. This additional time is only required if the
NRL is less than 1.0 for the three bridges.
Anticipated Project/Deliverable Schedule
• Notice to proceed TBD
• Final Load Rating Report NTP + 30 days
The project/deliverable schedule may be modified to reflect additional optional items added to
the Scope of Services, as required.
c1w,.V+a•�a�+rolwx�nwnww..dvm�a..+aa�+lrnrnr� �m vmyr»u�,i.wnan s,crs_w.nmcnw Papa I
Task We
Task
1
Task 1- Projett Management
$
2.242.56
$
66.60
$2.309.1
2
Tosk2- Review of Existing Bridge Information Site Vislt
$
2,984.88
$
280.20
$3,265,08
3
Task 3.1 -Load Rate Road 44& FCID Canal Bridge
$
4.496.04
$
246.60
$4,744.64
3
Task 3.2 - Load Rate Road 100 & FOD Canal Bridge
$
4,496.04
$,
246.60
$4,744.64
3
Task 3.3 -Load Rate Tacoma Ave& Lewis Street Bridge
$
5,638.44
$
279.20
$5,916.6
4
Task 4 -Bridge Load Rating of SRVs (Optional)
$
3,632.76
$
111.00
$3,713)
Tato/La0or
$20,723.92 $0.00
Escalation
$000
$24,723.92 $C ea
c1w,.V+a•�a�+rolwx�nwnww..dvm�a..+aa�+lrnrnr� �m vmyr»u�,i.wnan s,crs_w.nmcnw Papa I
HDR ENGINEERING LABOR ESTIMATE
u
x
5
=u'
Task#
Taaks b Subbsks
Pmjen
Man
P'.1
End...,
DAroC
Review., P M EF
wojecl
ConW.
Mang Rats
12800
10662
2MM
6229
12262
1
aakl-ftai Ysnaga..t0.
Praect lnGulon
-
0.
o _--_ e.
i
__ 1
I
S 2,24.2.W
_
Cocntnaw & mana,e Pronma Team _. _._ _..
Su dl mi.I d.
2 ___
2
_
-
_ i
-- —_
2
-
Task 2-Revbv of Eiblmg 86dge MumWIImI S Sb. VW1
Reylew EMgan2 @.y�e M.rmatlon _
16 6
__ _ 6
0
__
__.
4 0
zfi
S z M
--
9
Bile Yvl &qF Do.umelaalbn
Tank 3.1 -Loud Rale ROM sib FClp Carel BritlOe
Rahn Com ulatlon Ana .
t0
12- - 36
IB
2
<
0-0
IG
96 S a 68.Oi
IB
nF
vb
Com .Tapulab. FM Cldkal Values
2.
2
load A.6, P i
Load Pdlb A 's DeM9ed Ckeckk,
12
12
DlW ComrolquaR As.urelke Review
2
1
2
3
Task 32- LOMR1006 FM Canal BtWg* —
M boad
Anfina Conammia.adl MaNs.16
-
12
16
Cornvlb. Tabulme and Fab COUcal Values
2
� �and P,,dqd
a
LOM RaUna A."W Dele6M Chdano
12
12
chnom, Conko00uw, Aesubrca Renew
2
3--Tart3.9-loM
Rale Taxama Ave6 Lawb Sbeel e,id0e
R Ca iansandAm s
18 Z6 �
20
—��
0 —
-- —aeS 5,63BAi
20
Compft, Tabulale, and Feb C,lical Value
21
Load! RaI Report
s
i
Load!Ana id Delaiod Cn
16
1
1
QU CarnroV .p "..mote Review
c
-t
Teaks-BridOe LaM Ralbp of SlNs/DMbnal)----
Load Rab SHV.- Road ai6 FCID Canal
8 21
2 J
_ --3
1
---
6 0 -
10
-S 3.69216
1
LOM Rate SHV.-R.M1006PoIDGna1
Lcatl Rab BHV.- Tacoma Ave B Lewis St.
2 _ )
2 )
_ _ _ f
1
.._
.._. 10
10
Task Tabl Rddaa
72 1011
11
1
Tart Coat S
6pJ266 S 10,]66.62 S 2,396 J6 S
=.16 1 S 96256
S ".Mn
c w.an4..+�ro..uNl.+a.�wn e.«-ay.nuu...a..,�e.rcnsva.urnna.v..amw.ms-awuym.,e[+vu PrvrtN YIaddl5lda9.
' Techrrobay Charter is calculated as total labor hours tioWs $3.70 ver hour fpr HDR labor.
c-rymae,.w.I.-Irvpnrva„yem 111d11we-awry4eramn...f.taaapartw-
Eaq,mareE..q
Tvka-erowittowaeansna
raYza eew.rekagaakp
...1-ba4kare ROYUErO
Tnkzs-laaaeap pya4 zaoa
Pleaee enter eY02nee5
InlgmatlaniSire
Viul
ryW arNae
rW WiarMra
omLr Direct Doats
W uW Ip IfM Mm
Tlfyel Ees
Cost
TWO
Task Total
Task iota)
O
Taak Total
iaNt Total
An Fare - look actual eitlare
0
MOO
0
50.00
a
W6O
0
SOW
0
$0.00
Ai PEM Ma assumet5]Oa
Rates ose8 rare are or+nn-
SW'W
0
.W
0
W.W
0
WN
0
EO.W
0
SO.W
Car Rental,'veek vulM1 tax std/NaN spa
$2]5.00
0
WOO
0
1 $0.00
0
5000
0
50.00
0
WIN
Trud-RentaOMo. (iMOs li 3 a mileage)
51,500.00
0
W DO
0
50.00
0
Wm
0
$000
0
50.00
LCog rg look up aCNil IotlSeng tales
subKct m pePBKm'rul nt.
$15900
. __
0
_
W.W
_
0
50.00
0
_ -
WW
0
W:W
0
_ _
Meals
Whap poesibk look up aemai
S]1.W
_
0
$0.00
0
{
- 0
$0.00
"-
rales Inst apply try yow
W.W
0
WN
§0.00
0
Ga a1
a1Vr.lrnn
53.40
0
50.00
0
$0.00 _
0
50.00
0
0
WW
EDW._..
HOR O.meO Vela Cle MileagetMile
50.)50
_ 0
SOW
0
f0.00
0
SOW
_
0
_ $000
0
POV MiIaa Mile
EOSJS
ZW
5149.50
0
50.00
260
j 514950
0
woo
60.00
0
WWOO
Go
W00
Por WLm Tmel M WaaM1in bn
Coon
Cost
Od
TMel
0a
Task Tokl
Days
Task Tota'
Das
Task Total
De
Task Total
Per Orem L000^19 _-_-Franklin.
_ __.__$92.W
_ 0_�
WW
_ - 0
W.OQ
- 0
50.00
0
$OW
0
Wm
P rDiem-Meat
Fral44in
$46.W
p
50 W
U
1 $0.00
_0
'- WOO
0
-_-- --
SO.W
0
$O.W
75% Per Diem -Meals
Franklin
534.50
1
moo
0
$0.00
1
$34.50
0
Wm
0
Vim
TonsWoo
0
W.00
0
Wm
_
-_.. -
Click et fnx o st
et cos
pal
Das
Total
Days
Task Tplai
I all Total
Da
ask Total
as
Task Tole,
Per Orem LoE"m
W.W
0
W.000
EO.W
D
50.00
0
Um
0
$000
P D'..Meals
W.00
-_ 0
I
SOpD
c
1 woo
o
W00.
0
W
0
$0.00
759 P Diem -Meals
50.00a
EO W
0
T $0.00
0
I W.W
0
WOO
0
W.W
Tinel Expenu Total
5184.W
4 W.00
$184.00
EOW
W00
Obke eexs
Cost
QO,O
Tecknology
- M
156
$]25.20
16
SW.6D
a
$9620
38
5140.60_
36
$140.60
Co' age 65x1198PJ
50.05
0
W.W
0
W.W
0
EfiW0-
_ _
W.Op
D
-50.00
kS1Pa B.Sxn Color
50,45
3W
$13500
0
00
0
Sp.00
1W
$45W
100
8450
pp�Ra9ellxtJ6$W _ _
5009
0
W.W
0
W00
-0
$0.00
0
WOO
0
WOO
esrPeOel'xIJCraor
_WAD
W _
$S4.W
0
WOO,
_0
WW
---W
_
- $18.W
20
S1B00
-1
WIE Plote 9&W tiler eq. ft) _
f0:}4
0 _
W.00
0
- 50.00
5000
0
$040
0
_
SO.OU
1-0 Plob-Color .11.
50.90
0
W.W
0
_
W.00 �
_0
0
_
SOW
0
WM
0
.__. _
$O.W
Ex reed Mai
525.00
0M$I=.20
0
W.00
0
$O.W
0
AM
0
WW
CD .131 CO $2Q, BaCM1 atle. Copy 510
SW.W
3
0
WOO
0
5000
1
$2p.W
1
520.W
Conference Celkty pe mnpm line
_
WOS
00
Woo
0
EOW
0
_
$O.W
0
Sp.W
Orate lies-MaC. Ibebaraek
S25.W
36
SO.W
0
_
WN
- I -
_ � $25.W
1
825.00
OHke Suppiks Total
Nam
i 59620
S245b0
fx40.WTotal0005
65660
52W20
5248.60
S24B.WODC_0%
0
..
_
50000%W
0%
WOO
0%
$0. W
DDDSaND
f66.W
5280.20
5248.W
5246.W
Tolel Work Order(without Subcontractors)
$66.80
$280.20
$24860
524860
' Techrrobay Charter is calculated as total labor hours tioWs $3.70 ver hour fpr HDR labor.
c-rymae,.w.I.-Irvpnrva„yem 111d11we-awry4eramn...f.taaapartw-