Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015.02.23 Council Workshop PacketAGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. February 23, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance. 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) City Council District Boundaries Public Hearing: 1. Agenda Report from Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager dated February 18, 2015. 2. City Council Districts - Map, Current Districts. 3. City Council Districts - Map, Option No. 2a. 4. City Council Districts -Map, Option No. 3a. (b) Consideration of Multi -Agency Three Rivers Information & Communication Services (MATRICS) Interlocal Agreement: I. Agenda Report from Dave Zabell, City Manager dated February 17, 2015. 2. MATRICS - Interlocal Agreement. (c) Purchase of Mobile and Portable 800MHz Radios: 1. Agenda Report from Dave Zabell, City Manager dated February 17, 2015. 2. 800MHz Radios - Memorandum from Chief Metzger. 3. 800MHz Radios - Motorola Solutions Bids. 4. 800MHz Radios -Day Wireless Systems Bid. (d) Utility Rate Discussion and Recommendations: 1. Agenda Report from Eva Lindgren, Interim Finance Manager dated February 19, 2015. 2. Utility Rates - Proposed Ordinance. 3. Utility Rates - Stormwater Rate History. (e) Fire Safety Inspection Program - Update: 1. Agenda Report from Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director dated February 18, 2015. 2. Fire Safety Inspection Program - Fire Safety Inspection Checklist. (f) Street Vacation (MF #VAC2015-003) Kurtzman Alley Vacation Plan: 1. Agenda Report from Shane O'Neill, Planner I dated February 18, 2015. 2. Kurtzman Alley Vacation - Overview Map, 3. Kurtzman Alley Vacation - Vicinity Map. 5. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) (b) (c) 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (a) (b) (c) 7. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: 8. ADJOURNMENT REMINDERS: 1. 4:00 p.m., Monday, February 23, Ben -Franklin Transit Office - Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; SAUL MARTINEZ, Alt.) 2. 6:00 p.m., Monday, February 23, City Hall Conference Room #1 - LEOFF Disability Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS and COUNCILMEMBER REBECCA FRANCIK) 3. 7:30 a.m., Wednesday, February 25, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd - Visit Tri -Cities Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) 4. 4:00 p.m., Thursday, February 26, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd - TRIDEC Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager FROM: Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT: City Council District Boundaries Public Hearing I. REFERENCE(S): 1. City Council Districts — Map, Current Districts 2. City Council Districts — Map, Option No. 2a 3. City Council Districts — Map, Option No. 3a February 18, 2015 Workshop Mtg.: 2/23/15 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 2/23: CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING and provide direction to staff III. FISCAL IMPACT: 0/:1 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) Since last fall, Council has had considerable discussion on the need to review City Council District boundaries (to keep with the 10% population tolerance) and to develop a new district boundary plan prior to the 2015 election cycle, for which filing begins on May 11, 2015. Pursuant to RCW 29A.76.010(4), the plan shall be consistent with the following criteria: i. Each internal director, council, or commissioner district shall be as nearly equal in population as possible to each and every other such district comprising the municipal corporation, county or special purpose district. ii. Each district shall be as compact as possible. iii. Each district shall consist of geographically contiguous area. iv. Population data may not be used for purposes of favoring or disfavoring any racial group or political party. v. To the extent feasible and if not inconsistent with the basic enabling legislation for the municipal corporation, county, or district, the district boundaries shall coincide with existing recognized natural boundaries and shall, to the extent possible, preserve existing communities of related and mutual interest. B) In addition to adjusting boundaries to account for population growth, Council must be mindful of other issues as follows: i. The need to consider the City's sizeable Latino population and to attempt to draw boundaries which provide for equal voting opportunity (avoid "packing" a district with such an overwhelming minority population so as to unreasonably reduce the minority's electoral power and to avoid "cracking" the minority population into several districts so as to dilute the voting strength of the minority); ii. To maintain reasonable electoral balance so that the votes of all voters are not disproportionately debased while attempting to consider the needs addressed in i, above; and iii. While a decision has been reached in the Yakima lawsuit in Federal Court (See paragraph E, below), the decision could still be appealed. It will be important to continue monitoring to determine if the final outcome will have implications which merit further consideration by the City. 4(a) C) At Council's meeting of January 26, there were a number of comments/questions which arose, either during or after the public hearing, which are addressed below: i. It was noted that in each of the options presented on 1/26/15, the boundaries for Districts 1 and 2 were the same. This was supported by demographic data showing that under the proposed configuration for Districts 1 and 2, the citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) would be 60.6% Hispanic in District 1 and 52.0% in District 2. ii. Staff tasked our demographer with testing the CVAP for District 2 under a scenario where Precinct 11 (District 3) was moved to District 2 and Precinct 10 was moved to District 3. While the "look" and "compactness" of the districts appears to improve under this scenario (and there is insignificant change in population between the districts), the CVAP test shows that the Hispanic CVAP for District 2 decreases from 52.0% to less than 50% (49.3%) under this scenario. For this reason, this change is not recommended. iii. At the hearing in January it was stated that our demographic consultant had noted a boundary issue between Precincts 15 and 16 and had suggested that the two small block areas of Precinct 16, which are north of Court Street, be shifted from 16 to 15 to maintain census block group cohesiveness (and to render, as moot, a slight discrepancy between property lines and census block boundaries — which otherwise has the effect of splitting an apartment complex property in an inexplicable way) making this adjustment (conditional on agreement from the County Auditor) allows for the maintenance of majority Hispanic CVAP in District 2 at 52% while resulting in only an 8% population deviation between districts under either Option 2a or Option 3a. (It was not possible to modify the previous Option 1, as presented at the hearing of January 26, under this approach without exceeding 10% deviation.) Based on this information, staff recommends that the two scenarios best meeting the statutory criteria exist with either Option 2a or 3a. iv. At the January hearing, a citizen asked if it would not serve the City better by going to seven (7) district positions as opposed to five (5) districts and two (2) at -large. A primary reason to avoid this approach is the practical consideration that more districts result in less population within each district. With the difficulty of working with existing county precincts, each precinct would represent a greater percentage of the population of a district (if seven districts) than current. This would make it more difficult to make adjustments for population growth than is the current case. Another, and perhaps more serious, problem would be a possible claim of dilution of Hispanic voting strength (possibly moving from two districts with fair Hispanic CVAP to three districts with, necessarily, lower Hispanic CVAP percentages in each of the three districts). Finally, staff feels that there remain too many other unknown issues, rendering it imprudent to propose such broad changes for 2015 in light of the May 11 beginning of candidate filing week. D) A few housekeeping changes were made to the boundary lines of the precincts and by extension, the Council District Maps, as follows: i. The annexed area (in the vicinity of Highway 12 and Kahlotus Highway) formerly identified as County Precinct 101 has now been designated as Precinct 102 (this precinct was and continues to be in proposed District #1); ii. The annexed areas (Area 2 Annexation) of Precincts 62 and 63 were placed into a new Precinct 103 (these two former precincts had always been proposed for inclusion in District #5); iii. The newly annexed property north of Argent Road and west of Rd 68 was incorporated into Precinct 40 (under either Option 2a or 3a, Precinct 40 would be in District #4, while it is currently in District 5); iv. As previously noted to Council, two 2010 CENSUS Blocks in Precinct 16 (north of Court Street and just east of US 395) were shifted to Precinct 15 so as to clean up and consolidate an irregular CENSUS 2010 division which divides an apartment building between two 2010 CENSUS blocks. With the exception of item #4 above, these changes are merely cosmetic and do not affect population counts in any way, as those population numbers have already been accounted for. The changes in Precincts 15 and 16 are actually a return to the original County Precinct borders, dividing the precincts along Court Street rather than through the middle of an apartment complex. The change in population numbers for the shift from Precinct 16 to 15 has already been accounted for in Hispanic VAP and otherwise does not significantly affect the population counts in the Council District options. E) Since the last discussion, the Federal Court rendered its decision on February 17 determining Yakima's voting districts. Review of that decision supports the proposals submitted for Council's consideration. Creation of two Hispanic majority districts as proposed in both of the alternatives before the Council, avoids a "packing" problem the Court found to be present in the rejected City of Yakima proposed plan, and provides the opportunity for representation `roughly proportionate" to the population. The Court also gave some direction regarding the legal issue of district rather than city-wide voting in the general election which we are looking at to assist in that later decision to be made by the Council. It is important to remember that this case is still subject to appeal. F) Following the hearing on February 23, if Council is able to identify its preferred alternative, staff will be able to prepare an appropriate ordinance for the adoption of new district boundaries for the meeting of March 2. Notice for the hearing has been published in the same manner as for the January hearing: Tri -City Herald, to Decides and on the City's website. G) The terms for incumbent Councilmembers which are subject to election in 2015 include: District No. 1 (Councilmember Yenney), District No. 5 (Councilmember Francik), and At Large, Position No. 6 (Councilmember Watkins). Go O m 0 N O m N O O ss pJE O 3 ++ v ALJ y 0 0S _ _m o N a O C o v m O C. O Q J y N 1.V m Q 4- O I N i 1 � O O m 0 v 0 ALJ N o a m J y N m Q to I N N N h N d a� J Q AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council February 17, 2015 FROM: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Mtg.: 2/23/15 Regular Mtg.: 3/2/15 SUBJECT: Consideration of Multi -Agency Three Rivers Information & Communication Services (MATRICS) Interlocal Agreement I. REFERENCE(S): MATRICS - Interlocal Agreement H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 2/23: Discussion 3/2: MOTION: I move to approve the Interlocal Agreement for the creation of the Multi -Agency Three Rivers Information & Communication Services (MATRICS) with the cities of Richland and Kennewick, and Benton and Franklin Counties. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The City has been working in concert with Franklin and Benton Counties and the cities of Kennewick and Richland toward the consolidation of the two Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) serving the these agencies and others in the Tri -Cities region since 2007. Currently, law enforcement agencies in Benton County are dispatched by a PSAP operating on an 800 MHz frequency, while agencies in Franklin County are dispatched by a PSAP operating on VHF frequencies, the result being, that police officers from the two counties are unable to reliably and efficiently communicate with one another by radio. The lack of interoperability between the two radio systems is constant and during interagency incidents, represents a safety issue for the officers involved and the public. B) Consolidation of the two PSAPs into one, operating on an 800 MHz platform, is a City Council goal. The consolidation process has yielded the attached interlocal agreement (Agreement) for Council consideration which establishes an organization called Multi - Agency Three Rivers Information & Communication Services or MATRICS. V. DISCUSSION: A) If approved by all Member Agencies, the proposed Agreement will serve as the framework toward the consolidation of the two PSAPs through the establishment of MATRICS. MATRICS will serve as the vehicle through which the Member Agencies can effectively and efficiently meet their needs for public safety communications, records retention and usage, information technology, and other approved functions. B) If ratified, MATRICS shall create and approve by-laws consistent with the terms provided in the Agreement. Membership of the corporation shall be limited to the Member Agencies participating in this Agreement. C) The proposed Agreement establishes that governance of MATRICS will be carried out by Board of Directors ("Board") composed of one member appointed by each of the legislative bodies of the various Member Agencies. D) Approval and execution of the Agreement by the Member Agencies is a major step toward consolidation of the two PSAPs serving the Tri -Cities region, and lays the groundwork for subsequent agreement(s) to resolve other matters relating to consolidation (e.g. potential "buy in" costs, transfer of equipment and/or technology, personnel, etc.). E) Staff recommends approval of the Agreement. 4(b) 2015 INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT FOR MULTI -AGENCY THREE RIVERS INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION SERVICES (MATRICS) This 2015 Interlocal Cooperation Agreement for Multi -Agency Three Rivers Information and Communications Services ("Agreement") is entered into by and between the Cities of RICHLAND, KENNEWICK and PASCO, and the Counties of BENTON and FRANKLIN (collectively, the "Member Agencies"), and shall be effective on the date on which it has been adopted and executed by the legislative authority of the last Member Agency. RECITALS WHEREAS, Chapter 39.34, RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act) permits local government units to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities and thereby to provide services and facilities in a manner that will accord best with geographic, economic, population, and other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities; and WHEREAS, various municipalities, agencies, and entities located within the Counties of Benton and Franklin recognize the benefit the public would receive from providing consolidated emergency and public safety communications, records, and information technology to maximize efficiency and effectiveness of service to the public at minimum cost; and WHEREAS, partial consolidation has been realized under the Bi -County Police Information Network (BI -PIN) Interlocal Agreement and the Benton County Emergency Services (BCES) Interlocal Agreement, both of which are superseded and replaced by this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the undersigned Member Agencies now desire to create a single services management organization to provide law enforcement, fire and emergency medical services, communications technology, and related support services to the participants of this Agreement as the most effective and economical method to support each of the Member Agencies' respective constituents; and WHEREAS, to these objectives these Member Agencies are, or will be, committing themselves by appropriate legislative action. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, upon approval of each of the Member Agencies in accordance with RCW 39.34: 1. CREATION OF MATRICS. The Multi -Agency Three Rivers Information and Communication Services (hereinafter "MATRICS") is hereby created to allow all current and MAIMCSInterlocal - 2015 page I future Member Agencies to effectively and efficiently meet their combined needs for public safety communications, records retention and usage, information technology, and other approved functions. MATRICS, a public body, being an instrumentality of its members, shall be organized as a nonprofit corporation under Chapter 24.06 RCW as authorized by the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 39.34 RCW. Upon incorporation, MATRICS shall create and approve by-laws consistent with the terms provided herein. Membership of the corporation shall be limited to the Member Agencies participating in this Agreement. 2. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACTS, RIGHTS, AND DUTIES. MATRICS is authorized to assume, at its discretion, assignment of all contracts, rights, and duties so existing between BCES and/or BI -PIN and any other persons or organizations as of the effective date of this Agreement. 3. PRIOR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS SUPERSEDED. This Agreement is intended to supercede and replace the Bi -County Police Information Network (`BI -PIN") Interlocal Agreement entered into in 1982 and amended in 1988, 1992, 1995, and 2003, and the non -emergency management functions (i.e., dispatch functions) of the Benton County Emergency Services ("BCES") Interlocal Agreement entered into in 1996 and amended in 2006 and 2008. 4. DEFINITIONS. a. "Agreement" means this Multi -Agency Three Rivers Information and Communication Services htterlocal Cooperation Agreement. b. "Member Agency" or "Member Agencies" means those jurisdictions who are fully participating, have ownership equity in MATRICS, are meeting financial obligations, and have voting rights as determined within this Agreement. At the onset of this Agreement, this shall mean Franklin County, Benton County, and the Cities of Pasco, Kennewick, and Richland. C. "Subscribers" means those municipal jurisdictions who are receiving some or all of the services provided by this organization for a contract fee, who do not have voting rights on the Board of Directors ("Board") and may not participate on the Strategic Advisory Committee. d. "Service Line" means a major category of service being offered by MATRICS to its Member Agencies and subscribers, having an associated fee schedule/formula. e. "Quorum" means a majority of the number of members of the Executive Board. The Board is required to have a quorum in order to conduct business. f. "Communications Center" is the physical location where emergency telephone numbers are answered by trained staff and from which law enforcement, fire and emergency medical services are directed to respond to emergency calls. g. "Calls for Service" or "CFS" refers to an assignment directed by the Dispatch Center to law enforcement, fire and/or emergency services requiring the assigned MATRICS Interlocal - 2015 page 2 agency to respond and provide services.. The calls are initiated by the Dispatch Center and issued through normal channels (e.g., digitally through the CAD system, via radio). h. "Data Center" is the facility used to house computer systems and associated components, such as telecommunications and storage systems. It generally includes redundant or backup power supplies, redundant data communications connections, environmental controls (e.g., air conditioning, fire suppression) and security devices. i. "Seats" refers to the number of licenses for software that a jurisdiction may use, typically as measured through the number of authorized log-ins to the software. j. "Absolute two-thirds vote" means two-thirds of the total eligible voters, whether present or not, on an issue are required for approval of an action. An absolute two-thirds vote is required for approval of MATRICS policies, budget adoption and amendment, and all personnel actions. All other actions of the Executive Board require approval by simple majority vote. Abstentions shall be counted as nay votes. 5. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall be of unlimited duration, subject to the termination provisions contained herein. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date the last-signing Member Agency obtains legislative approval of this Agreement. 6. PURPOSE. Through this Agreement, the Member Agencies assign to MATRICS the authority for public safety communications, certain records retention and usage, and other approved functions as determined by the Board, for the purpose of communications and dispatching for public health and safety services. 7. MEMBERSHIP. The "Member Agencies" of MATRICS shall be the municipalities, agencies, and entities listed in Exhibit A that have approved this Agreement in accordance with RCW 39.34.030, as well as those municipalities, agencies, and entities that, from time to time, may be permitted by the Member Agencies to join MATRICS as Member Agencies, and that shall approve this Agreement, and any amendments thereto, in accordance with RCW 39.34.030 and the provisions of this Agreement. a. Process for Adding New Members. Upon receipt of a written application or request to join MATRICS, the Executive Director shall present it to the Board Chair, who will forward it to the Board of Directors at their next board meeting. The Board may direct an evaluation to be completed by the Executive Director to determine the operational and fiscal impacts of adding the proposed member to MATRICS. A preliminary report of any such report will be presented to the Board at its next meeting. The Board may take action on the application or direct that further study be undertaken to address remaining issues or concerns identified by the Board. The results of such study shall be presented to the Board at a regular or special meeting as soon as practicable. After receiving the final report, the Board may take action to approve, deny or table an application. As a condition of membership, new Members added to MATRICS must agree to execute an Addendum to this Agreement recognizing said new Member and specifying the Member's financial responsibility to MATRICS as provided in Section 12(g)(5), below. MATRICS Interlocal - 2015 Page 3 b. Change in Existing Member Status. The parties recognize that over time the status of one or more of its existing member organizations may change as a result of mergers, consolidations, creation of a regional fire authority, or other organizational status changes. At least six (6) months prior to the effective date of such change in status of any member, such member shall provide notice to the Board and submit any and all reasonably necessary information requested by the Executive Director to MATRICS, to facilitate evaluation of potential operational and fiscal impacts on MATRICS. The Executive Director shall present his/her findings to the Board. (1) If a majority of the Board finds that the change in a member(s) legal status has a material impact on the finances or operations of MATRICS, the Members agree that this Interlocal Agreement shall be renegotiated to address such impact(s). (2) If a majority of the Board finds that the change in a Member's legal status has no material impact on the finances or operations of MATRICS, the Members agree to execute an Addendum to the Agreement recognizing the Member's successor - in -interest or assignee, as necessary to accurately reflect the current Membership of MATRICS. 8. SUBSCRIBING AGENCIES. The "Subscribing Agencies" of MATRICS are those municipal jurisdictions who are receiving some or all of MATRICS's services for a contract fee, who do not have voting rights on the Board, and do not participate on the Strategic Advisory Committee. The Board shall stipulate the application process for a jurisdiction desiring to become a Subscriber for all or partial Service Lines of MATRICS. Said jurisdiction must be located either within or adjacent to a county that is a Member Agency of MATRICS. Board approval is required prior to offering such services. Such new Subscribers would be subject to the Service Line costs based upon their usage, and responsible for paying a network attachment fee to connect to the MATRICS network in such amounts as determined by the Board. 9. BOARD OF DIRECTORS. MATRICS shall be governed by a Board of Directors ("Board") composed of Board Members appointed by the legislative bodies of the various Member Agencies to this Agreement. Each Member Agency shall be entitled to one Board Member. Each Member Agency shall designate one or more "Alternate Board Member(s)" for its Board Member position(s). Alternate Board Members, whose names shall be filed with MATRICS, shall act in lieu of the Board Member when the Board Member is not otherwise available to attend meetings. The Alternate Board Member shall have full powers to vote and act as a Board Member at all meetings that the Alternate Board Member attends in lieu of the regular Board Member. 10. BOARD ACTIONS AND VOTING. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, decisions of the Board shall be made at a public meeting for which proper notice was given and after a quorum has been established. The presence of fifty-one percent (51 %) of the total number of Member agencies shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting business. 11. BOARD OF DIRECTORS POWERS. In furtherance of its purposes, the Board shall have the power to: AMTRICS Interlocal - 2015 page 4 a. Acquire, receive, take by gift, construct, improve, own, manage, lease, transfer, and sell real, personal, and intangible property; b. Operate and maintain MATRICS's equipment and facilities; C. Enter into contracts with public and private entities; d. Employ and terminate personnel, with or without cause, and contract for personnel and services with public and private entities; e. Defend and pursue legal actions; f. Establish and collect rates, fees, charges, and collect assessments as determined by this Agreement; g. Review and adopt an annual budget and approve budget expenditures; h. Recommend action to the legislative bodies of the Member Agencies; i. Establish policies, guidelines, or regulations to carry out MATRICS's operations and responsibilities; and j. Exercise all other powers that are within the statutory authority of, and may be exercised by, its Member Agencies with respect to their duty to provide emergency and public safety communications services, and all other duties that each Member Agency has assigned to MATRICS pursuant to this Agreement. 12. BOARD DUTIES. a. Board Chair/Meetings. The Board, at its initial meeting, to be held no later than September 2, 2015, shall elect a Chair and Vice -Chair from among the Board Members. The Chair will be the presiding officer of the Board and Board meetings. The Vice - Chair will act as the presiding officer in the Chair's absence, unless the Vice -Chair is also absent, in which event a pro tem Chair shall be elected by a majority of the Board to act as the presiding officer of that meeting. Should the Chair resign from his or her position during the year, the Vice -Chair will assume the position of Chair, and the Board shall elect a new Vice -Chair. At the initial meeting, the Board also shall determine the time and place of its meetings; provided that the Board may, with notice, change its meeting schedule. The Board shall hold meetings at the call of the Chair or any two or more members. In no case shall the Board meet less than twice annually. Meetings shall be held at a location within the MATRICS service area. b. Board Committees. The Board Chair may, as the need exists, create Ad Hoc Technical Advisory Committees to engage in activities in support of the Board's work. Committees will be composed of Board Members, Alternate Board Members, Strategic Advisory Committee members, and/or individuals with relevant expertise or experience beneficial to the particular committee objective. Committee members shall be volunteers appointed by and serving at the will of the Board Chair. MATRICSInterlocal - 2015 page 5 C. Executive Director. The Board shall appoint a MATRICS Executive Director, who shall be selected based on his or her relevant technical, financial and administrative experience and competence. The appointment shall be made on the basis of merit only. The Executive Director is an "at will" position and may be terminated from the position upon vote of the Board with or without cause. The Executive Director shall report to the presiding officer and be responsible to the Board; shall advise the Board, by budget proposals and other appropriate means, with regard to legislative action being considered by the Board; shall administer the program and operations of MATRICS consistent with policies adopted by the Board; shall be the Board's financial officer, with any disbursements exceeding budgeted amounts to be approved in advance by the Board; shall have authority, delegated by the Board, to hire, discipline, and discharge all MATRICS personnel consistent with policies adopted by the Board; and shall perform such additional duties and exercise such additional authority as the Board may, from time to time, assign to or confer upon the Executive Director. d. Additional Services. The Board shall evaluate and determine the appropriateness of including additional communications, dispatching or other services for Member Agencies and others, when so requested, and shall determine whether and how such services should be provided and the appropriate fees for such services; provided that such fees shall offset all installation and operational costs applicable to such services. Additional services may include, but shall not be limited to, alarms for public and private buildings. The Board shall not approve additional services that detract from the effectiveness of MATRICS's emergency and public safety communications services. e. OQperational Enhancements. It shall be the objective of the Board to encourage future additional cooperation among Member Agencies. The Executive Director, with the advice and assistance of the Strategic Advisory Committee, shall actively consider and evaluate opportunities that would enhance the operational effectiveness of public health and safety communications, to the benefit of the taxpayers and residents of the areas served. The Executive Director's and/or Strategic Advisory Committee's recommendations and proposed actions may be presented to the Board and/or Member Agencies, when the Board so directs. f. Personnel Policies. The presiding officer may, as needs require, appoint a Personnel Committee, which shall advise the Board and the Director in the formulation and administration of MATRICS's personnel policies. The Board shall establish the personnel policies of MATRICS, and revise them as the Board deems appropriate. g. Finances. The Board shall consider and give approval to MATRICS's annual budget prior to October 1 of the preceding year; provided that the Board may, by resolution, set a revised deadline as required. The Board shall advise the Member Agencies of the program and objectives of the budget, the financial participation of each Member Agency, and the planned use of reserves for the ensuing year. No expenditures outside an approved budget may be made by MATRICS without express Board approval. Any and all revenues received by MATRICS shall be placed in accounts approved by the Board. (1) MATRICS shall be funded by the proceeds of telephone excise taxes, 911 taxes, an annual levy upon Member Agencies, buy -in fees, and Service Line fees paid by subscribing agencies. Upon the effective date of this Agreement, all Member Agencies hereby MATRICS Interlocal - 2015 Page 6 agree to assign and forward all telephone excise taxes and 911 taxes received by the jurisdiction to the operation and administration of MATRICS. The annual levy upon Member Agencies, buy - in fees, and Service Line fees paid by subscribers shall be determined and approved by the Board. (2) MATRICS may accept gifts, grants, or loans of money, equipment or services from any lawful source. MATRICS shall cooperate with local, state and federal government agencies and any private funding sources to maximize the use of grants or gifts for equipment and operations. (3) The Board may increase the required financial contributions of the Member Agencies within a budget year to meet emergency needs or cover extraordinary expenses not anticipated in MATRICS's approved budget. Such increases shall be proportionate to the total budget responsibility of each Member Agency. In the event the cost overrun can be attributed to one or more specific Member Agencies or subscribers, the Board may vote to assess the overrun to those specific Member Agencies or subscribers in lieu of levying all Member Agencies in proportion to budget responsibility. (4) From time to time, some form of new service may be available to make all or part of MATRICS's operation more beneficial to some participating Member Agencies than to others. If this should be the case, any Board approval shall be contingent on approval of a separate Board action detailing the apportionment of costs to each Member Agency for the provision of said service. (5) If a new Member Agency joins MATRICS, the Board shall determine the financial contribution for the new Member Agency from the effective date of membership until the next regular cost allocation among all Member Agencies. 13. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT. a. In accordance with RCW 39.34.060, upon the effective date of this Agreement, certain properties, equipment and monies, including certain properties, equipment and monies titled to agencies superseded by this Agreement, shall become the property of MATRICS. The Board is authorized to accept title to any such property as identified in Exhibit B of this Agreement. b. Any property, equipment, or monies lawfully acquired, from any source and in any way, after the effective date of this Agreement shall be the sole property of MATRICS. C. As needed, and in conformance with the approved budget, equipment and furnishings may be acquired by, and title shall rest with, MATRICS. The Executive Director shall maintain a schedule of such equipment. Requested changes in equipment and furnishings shall be included in the Executive Director's draft annual budget and presented in detail to the Board during the budget review process. 14. STRATEGIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE. The Strategic Advisory Committee, to be composed of the Police and Fire Chiefs of the Member Agencies, or their designees, shall MATRICS Interlocal - 2015 page 7 meet periodically with the Executive Director to assist and advise the Executive Director as to operational and procedural matters. The Strategic Advisory Committee shall select an individual to act as its Chair. The Chair shall advise the Board at its regularly scheduled meetings, and otherwise as appropriate, of the needs of the operating departments serviced by MATRICS when requested by the Executive Director or any member of the Board of Directors. 15. WITHDRAWAUREMOVAL FROM MATRICS. a. Withdrawal. The parties acknowledge that in entering into this Agreement, significant financial and personnel resources have been expended. Therefore, no Member Agency may voluntarily withdraw from this Agreement within the first five (5) years following the date of membership. After such time, any Member Agency may withdraw from MATRICS by giving written notice of no less than twelve (12) months (the "Withdrawal Period"). The written notice must contain evidence of approval of the withdrawal by the Member Agency's legislative authority. The withdrawal will be effective on December 31 following the expiration of the Withdrawal Period. Once submitted, a notice of withdrawal may be rescinded only with approval of the Board. b. Removal of a Member A ency. Any Member Agency may be removed from MATRICS by the Board where it finds that the Member Agency has materially breached this Agreement. A material breach is defined as a failure to pay the required Member Agency contribution toward the annual budget within a reasonable amount of time after receiving written notice to pay the same. A Member Agency removed from MATRICS under this Section shall pay all costs incurred by MATRICS in recovering said delinquent funds, including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. 16. DISSOLUTION OF MATRICS. If the Board votes to dissolve MATRICS, the organization shall be dissolved as of December 31 of the year in which the vote was taken, unless the Board votes to extend the time for dissolution to a later date to accommodate the need to transition services to another qualified agency or for any other business purpose. 17. DISPOSITION OF ASSETS UPON DISSOLUTION. In the event of dissolution, the costs associated with dissolving MATRICS and disposing of its assets shall be borne jointly by all Member Agencies. Assets shall be disposed of by sale or distribution in accordance with state law. Upon the dissolution of MATRICS, and after payment of all valid costs, expenses, and charges incurred by MATRICS, in the winding up of the agency's business affairs, the Agency and/or the Board shall disburse all remaining funds held by MATRICS, as well as any funds derived from the sale of any property, to the then participating Member Agencies in an amount proportionate to each Member Agency's percentage of financial contribution made during the year of dissolution. a. Any Member Agency whose withdrawal or removal from this Agreement has become effective prior to the vote to dissolve MATRICS shall have no right to receive any portion of the distribution of MATRICS's assets by virtue of its participation in MATRICS prior to the effective date of its withdrawal or removal. MATRICS Interlocal - 2015 page 8 b. All legal and financial obligations incurred by MATRICS prior to termination shall remain the obligation of MATRICS. 18. OPERATIONAL INTERCONNECTS. Each Member Agency is responsible for and retains authority over its operational departments and for such equipment and services as are required at its place of operation to interconnect with MATRICS's operations. 19. INSURANCE. MATRICS shall maintain, and shall include in its budget provision for, liability and casualty insurance policies as the Board shall determine appropriate. This obligation may be accomplished by participation in an insurance pool or self-insurance program established in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. 20. INDEMNIFICATION/SURVIVAL OF INDEMNITY. The Member Agencies and any former Member Agencies shall share in any excess liability of MATRICS for claims, losses, or liabilities that arose during a budget year on the same percentage basis as their relative financial participation in MATRICS for that budget year. "Excess liability" shall refer to liability incurred by MATRICS, as determined by judgment or approved settlement agreement, that is in excess of applicable insurance coverage (including excess liability insurance policies). Whether or not a claim, loss, or liability arose during a particular budget year shall be determined by the date on which the incident or incidents occurred that gave rise to such liability. A Member Agency that withdraws from MATRICS shall be obligated by its participation in any budget year to share in any excess liability arising during that budget year regardless of date of judgment or approved settlement agreement, as stated herein. The provisions of this Section shall survive any of the following: termination of this Agreement, legal dissolution of MATRICS, or the withdrawal of any Member Agency. 21. MAINTENANCE AND AUDIT OF RECORDS. MATRICS shall maintain books, records, documents and other materials relevant to its performance under this Agreement which sufficiently and accurately reflect any and all direct and indirect costs and expenses incurred or paid in the course of performing this Agreement. These records shall be subject to inspection, review and audit by a Member Agency or its designee, the Washington State Auditor's Office, and authorized federal agencies. MATRICS shall retain all such books, records, documents and other materials in accordance with the Washington State Archivist's Retention Schedule. 22. RECORDS ACCESS. MATRICS shall be responsible for compliance with the Public Records Act. In Addition, MATRICS shall provide that its use of confidential information complies with all applicable laws. MATRICS shall establish rules and regulations governing access to and security for the data communications network and for any confidential information it receives. Such rules and regulations shall be consistent with the applicable laws governing confidentiality and authorized uses of such records. 23. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties intend to resolve all disputes relating to the interpretation and application of this Agreement through informal discussions at the appropriate staff level. In the event disputes cannot be resolved informally, the parties agree to submit the dispute to non-binding mediation before resorting to arbitration. In the event the parties are unable to agree to a mediator or resolve this dispute through mediation, the dispute MATRICS Interlocal - 2015 Page 9 shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to RCW 7.04A, as amended, with both parties waiving the right of a jury trial upon trial de novo, with venue placed in Richland, Benton County, Washington. The substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs as additional award and judgment against the other. 24. NOTICE. Unless otherwise notified in writing, notice required to be given to MATRICS under the terms of this Agreement shall be directed to the following: Chair, MATRICS Board of Directors c/o Principal Agency Address Notice required hereunder may be given by mail, overnight delivery, facsimile or email (with confirmation of transmission), or personal delivery. Any participant wishing to change its mail or email address shall promptly notify the MATRICS Board Chair. Notice or other written communications shall be deemed to be delivered when postmarked, sent by facsimile or email (with confirmation of transmission), or received by personal delivery. 25. FILING. Prior to its entry in force, this Agreement shall be filed with the Benton and Franklin County Auditors, or, alternatively, listed by subject on a Member Agency's website or other electronically retrievable public source as provided by RCW 39.34.040. 26. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable, all of the other provisions shall remain valid and enforceable notwithstanding, unless the provision found to be unenforceable is of such material effect that this Agreement cannot be performed in accordance with the intent of the Member Agencies in the absence thereof. 27. VENUE. The venue for any arbitration related to this Agreement shall be in Richland, Benton County, Washington. 28. AUTHORITY. This Agreement shall be executed on behalf of each Member Agency by its authorized representative, pursuant to appropriate legislative action by such Member Agency. It shall be deemed adopted and effective upon the date of execution by the last so authorized representative. 29. RATIFICATION. All prior acts taken by the Member Agencies consistent with this Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed. 30. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement, and any exhibits to it, may be amended by written agreement approved by appropriate legislative action by all participating Member Agencies. 31. WAIVER. Nothing herein shall be deemed to waive the immunities established pursuant to Chapter 38.52 RCW or to create third party rights or liabilities. [Signature page to follow) MATRICS Interlocal - 2015 Page 10 units: THIS AGREEMENT is approved and entered into by the undersigned local government CITY OF RICHLAND, WASHINGTON CITY OF KENNEWICK, WASHINGTON Date CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON Title COUNTY OF BENTON, WASHINGTON Title COUNTY OF FRANKLIN, WASHINGTON By_ Title MATIUCS Interlocal - 2015 Page 11 Exhibit A The following municipalities, agencies, and entities are Member Agencies of MATRICS, and are entitled to appoint the number of Board Members identified below: Entity Number of Board Members City of Richland I City of Kennewick 1 City of Pasco 1 County of Benton 1 County of Franklin 1 MATRICS Interlocal -1015 Page 12 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Dave Zabell, City Manager SUBJECT: Purchase of Mobile and Portable 800MHz Radios I. REFERENCE(S): I . 800MHz Radios — Memorandum from Chief Metzger 2. 800MHz Radios — Motorola Solutions Bids 3. 800MHz Radios — Day Wireless Systems Bid February 17, 2015 Workshop Mtg.: 2/23/15 Regular Mtg.: 3/2/15 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 2/23: Discussion 3/2: MOTION: I move to authorize the City Manager to purchase mobile and portable 800MHz radios, in numbers sufficient to replace the current inventory of such equipment through the state bid for an amount of up to $379,000, utilizing the vendor's zero percent financing option. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Fund: General (2016) Amount: $353,519 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) Since 2007 the City has been working in concert with Franklin and Benton Counties and the cities of Kennewick and Richland toward the consolidation of the two Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs), serving the these agencies and others in the Tri -Cities region. Currently, law enforcement agencies in Benton County operate on 800MHz frequency, while agencies in Franklin County operate on VHF frequencies, the result being that police officers from the two counties are unable to communicate effectively and efficiently with one another by radio. The lack of interoperability between the two radio systems is constant and during interagency incidents, represents a safety issue for the officers involved and the public. B) Consolidation of the two PSAPs into one, operating on an 800MHz platform, is a City Council goal. The consolidation process has yielded an interlocal agreement for Council consideration which will establish an organization called Multi -Agency Three Rivers hiformation & Communication Services or MATRICS. While the execution of the proposed agreement has yet to occur, its consideration by the legislative bodies of the five agencies is imminent. C) Early on, it was determined that MATRICS will work on an 800MHz platform for Police, which necessitates the need for Pasco to change its mobile and portable units from VHF to 800MHz. As the agencies have worked toward consolidation of emergency communication services, and in anticipation of the transition from VHF to 800MHz radios, since 2007 the City has been deferring replacement of police VHF band radios. In the interim, the inventory of mobile and portable VHF radios serving the Police Department has continued to age and deteriorate to the point that the entire inventory of mobiles and most of the portables are past end of life and need to be replaced. The cost for updating the City's VHF inventory is approximately $331,065 based on state bid prices. 4(c) V. DISCUSSION: A) Recent discussions and collaboration between Franklin County Sheriff Jim Raymond and Chief Metzger have resulted in an opportunity to partner in a temporary measure to transition to the 800MHz platform. The proposal involves the installation of a "patch" into Franklin County dispatch center that will allow agencies dispatched by Franklin County, including Pasco to move to the 800MHz platform in advance of the PSAP consolidation. While this "patch" is a short term remedy, and lacks the reliability of the ultimate one PSAP system, it will significantly enhance safety for our officers and the public over the current system. The total cost to replace the aging VHF equipment and upgrade to 800MHz equipment is on the order of $379,000. As a side note, by purchasing these radios now, will result in a savings of $41,600 as unit prices on the state bid are scheduled to increase this month. B) The advantages of moving forward with the use of the "patch" and purchase of the 800MHz mobile and portable units now offers the following benefits: i. Officer Safety: Interoperability with Benton County agencies during interagency operations will be attained. Better coverage within the City's service area, currently an estimated 30% of our city has insufficient coverage from the VHF system. Due to age and use, the reliability of the existing VHF mobile and portable units are coming into question and require replacement. ii. Cost: the unit price cost of the 800MHz radios, through the state bid, is scheduled to increase approximately $300-$400 per radio. This will increase the total cost for the proposed system upgrade by $41,600. Staff has reserved sufficient units pending Council approval. iii. Regardless of the sequence, the purchase of 800MHz mobile and portable radios have always been a necessary step for Pasco in implementing the full 911 consolidation and purchasing them now not only avoids a cost increase, it saves the cost of replacing VHF units (approximately $331,065) that are or are becoming unserviceable in the interim. C) If authorized by Council, the purchase of this equipment may require amendment to the 2015 budget depending on the option selected. The following alternatives are available to fund this purchase: i. Use of Fund Balance: while sufficient funds exist, the purchase would reduce fund balance by $353,519, thanks to $25,000 in grant funding. However, current revenue estimates show even with this expenditure our fund balance will remain above the current general fund balance $6,500,000 approved by Council in the 2015 budget. ii. Low interest loan from the LOCAL program: the LOCAL program is administered by the State of Washington and allows the local governments to stretch the payments over a period of time at low interest rates. For instance, a loan term of three to five years would have an estimated interest rate of I% to 2% annually. iii. Vendor Financing: Motorola, the state bid supplier, has a zero (0) percent program for one year. This would allow the City to take delivery of the equipment with little or no capital outlay and pay the balance off in the next fiscal year. D) Staff recommends that Council authorize purchase of the 800MHz equipment and implement the transition to 800MHz for law enforcement communications utilizing the 0% financing available from the vendor. Staff would then prepare the 2016 budget anticipating payoff of the interest free loan in early 2016. i MEMORANDUMno a et. TO: Dave Zabell, City Manag(fV r FROM: Bob Metzger, Police Chi RE: 800MHz Radios DATE: February 18, 2015 Since 2007, the police department has been working on mobile radio and dispatch issues. Officers in Benton County are on an 800MHz frequency, while officers in Franklin County are on the VHF frequency. This meant that officers could not communicate with each other. In times of interagency incidents such as the ones that we had in Pasco this past year, that created some big issues for officer and citizen safety. Several studies have been conducted and all of them have shown that a combined radio system with all police agencies on one frequency would be a benefit to both counties. City Council also made this one of their council goals several years ago. With the recent election of Jim Raymond to Franklin County Sheriff, I have been able to discuss this issue with him at length. We both agree that moving police agencies to one frequency in both counties is a good idea and is giving his full support to this. Unfortunately the interlocal agreement and many other issues that have been held up for years are still not finalized, but our need for a better radio system has only gotten more critical. As a temporary measure, and as a way to get us on the 800 platform, Sheriff Raymond and I have agreed to place a "patch" into Franklin County dispatch that will allow us to move over to the 800 system, using Franklin County as our dispatch service provider. This is a short term remedy, or band aid, that will allow time for the intricacies of the full combined dispatch to take place. This will solve our immediate needs and will allow the second part of this, the combined PSAP, to progress at whatever pace is required. I am making this recommendation now for the following reasons: 1. Officer Safety — our current system continues to degrade and we have about 30% of our city with insufficient coverage over the current VHF system. 2. Cost — on February 16, 2015 the cost of 800MHz radios through the state of Washington Bid will go up approximately $300 - $400 per radio. This will increase our total cost for this upgrade by $41,600. Memorandum February 18, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell FROM: Chief Metzger Page 2 3. This is a necessary first step for Pasco in implementing the full 911 consolidation. 4. We have obtained $30,000 from Homeland Security funding to obtain 800MHz radios. $5,000 of this will be used for the "patch" and the rest, $25,000, can be used to fund the additional 800MHz radios that we need. In March, 2012 we were able to obtain free of charge from Richland through SECOMM, 11 mobiles and 16 portables for a cost savings of $88,768. This was done in anticipation of us going to the fully consolidated MATRICS system. By purchasing these radios now we will save the $41,600 plus the $88,768 that we obtained free of charge, plus the $25,000 from Homeland Security, for a total savings of $155,368. This represents a total savings of 31% of a total budget if we had to purchase all new radios and if we did this after February 16. Attached is the total cost to complete our fleet of vehicles to the 800MHz system. This total cost of $377,742, plus approximately $1,258 for the 800 patch in Franklin County dispatch for a total of approximately $379,000, will be reduced by $25,000 for a total city cost of approximately $354,000, which would be the request being made now. Additionally we have not been replacing our VHF equipment as needed over the past seven years in anticipation of moving to the 800 platform. As such our entire fleet of mobiles and most of our portables are past end of life and will need to be replaced. If we decided to replace the VHF radios we could not use the Homeland Security money for this and the free radios that we received from SECOMM would be of no benefit to us. The cost for updating our VHF system would be $331,065. This represents a difference of $21,677. In summary, to upgrade our radios to the 800 platform as we have been planning to do would only cost an additional $21,677 if we do this now. It is my recommendation that we proceed with the 800 drop into Franklin County and purchase the 800MHz radios at the reduced cost. Please review this information and if you have any questions or need further information please let me know. ©Motorola Solutions, Inc. Date: Fepuary 18. 2015 Financing proposal for: City of Pasco, WA Communications System Financing Proposal Motorola Solutions Credit Company LLC Is pleased to submit the following proposal for the financing of yo Motorola Communications AN equipment in accordance with the tens and conditions outlined below: Transaction Type: Municipal Lease -Purchase Agreement Lessor. Motorola Solutions, Inc. (or its Assignee) Lessee: City of Pasco, WA Amount: $370,202.20 Down Payment: $0.00 Balance to Finance: $370,202.20 Equipment: As per the Motorola equipment proposal. Title: Title to the equipment will vest with the Lessee. Insurance: Lessee will be responsible to Insure the equipment as outlined in the lea: contract. Taxes: Personal property, sales, leasing, use, stamp, or other tastes are forth, account of the Lessee. First year interest free Option One Option Two Lease Term: Three Years Five Years Payment Frequency: Annual Annual Payment Structure: Arrears Arrears Lease Rate First year: 0% 0% Lease Rate remaining term: 3.29% 3.33% Lease Factor: 0.344180 0.213313 Lease Payment: $127,416.11 $78,968.87 Payment Commencement; First payment due one year from contract executfon. Expiration; This Interest rate is valid for all leases commenced by 2/28/2015 Qualifications: Receipt ofa properly executed documentation package. Lessee qualities as a political subdivision or agency of the State as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The interest portion of the Lease Payments shall be excludable from the Lessors gross income pursuant to Section 103 ofthe Internal Revenue Code. Receipt of a copy of the last years audited financial statements and current years budget from the Lessee. This proposal should not be construed as a commitment to finance. It is subject to final Motorola credit committee approval. This quote is based on the general level of Interest rates, primarily U.S. Treasury Bills of like term maturity. Any movement in those rates in excess of 10 basis points will result in the revision of this quote. Documentation: Municipal Equipment Lease Purchase Agreement Opinion of Counsel Schedule A / Equipment List Schedule B / Amortization Schedule 803BG UCCA Certificate of Incumbency Statement of Essential Use/Source of Funds Evidence of Insurance or Statement of Self Insurance Resolution from goveming body authorizing the execution of the Lease Please feel free to contact me ifthem are any questions or if an allemate structuring is required. Regards, Bill Stancik Motorola Customer Financing 847-538-4531 Quote Number: QU0000307897 MOrCROLA SOLUTIONS Effective: 02 FEB 2015 Effective To: 23 FEB 2015 BBI -To: Ultimate Destination: PASCO POLICE DEPT PASCO POLICE DEPT P 0 BOX 293 525 N 3RD AVE PASCO, WA 99301 PASCO, WA 99301 United States United States Attention: Name: Captain Jeff Harpster Email: harpsterj@pasco-wa.gov Phone: 545-2483 Contract Number: WSCA STANDARD Freight terms: FOB Destination Payment terms: Net 30 Due Sales Contact: Name: Marlon Johnson Email: mjohnson@daywireless.com Phone: 5095478502 Item Quality Nomenclature Description List price Your price Extended Price 1 27 M25URS9PWIAN APX65007/800 MHZ MID POWER $1,899.00 $1,424.25 $38,454.75 MOBILE la 27 G442AI ADD: 05 CONTROL HEAD 5432.00 $324.00 $8,748.00 It, 27 067BC ADD: REMOTE MOUNT MID POWER $297.00 $222.75 $6,014.25 Ic 27 W22BA ADD: PALM MICROPHONE $72.00 $54.00 $1,458.00 Id 27 G24AX ENH: 2 YEAR REPAIR SERVICE $121.00 $121.00 $3,267.00 ADVANTAGE lc 27 G444AE ADD: APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE - If 27 G174AD ADD: ANT 3DB LOW -PROFILE 762-870 543.00 $32.25 $870.75 18 27 BI8CR ADD: AUMLARY SPKR 7.5 WATT $60.00 545.00 $1215.00 Ih 27 QAOI749AB SW KEY SUPPLEMENTAL DATA - I 27 QA02756AC ENH.* 9600 OR 3600 SINGLE SYSTEM $1,570.00 $1,177.50 $31,792.50 DIG 2 75 H98UCF9PW6AN APX6000700/800 MODEL 2.5 $2200.00 $1,650.00 $123,750.00 PORTABLE 2a 75 QA01749AB SW KEY SUPPLEMENTAL DATA - 2b 75 QA02818AA ALT:LEON IMPRES FM/CSA 2300M $50.00 $37.50 $2,812.50 (NNTN8092) 2c 75 QA01222AB ADD: BELT CLIP 3.0" (HLN6875) $12.00 $9.00 $675.00 2d 75 H885BK ENH:2 YR StS LITE $54.00 $84.00 $6,300.00 2e 75 QA02756AA ADD: 9600 TRUNKING OR 3600 $1,570.00 $1,177.50 588,312.50 DIGITAL TRUNKING 2f 75 H122BR ALT: 1/4 -WAVE 7/800 OPS STUBBY $24.00 $18.00 31,350.00 (NAR6595A 3 75 WPIN7080A CHR IMP SUC EXT US/NA/CA/LA $125.00 $93.75 $7,031.25 4 2 M25URS9PWIAN APX65007/800 MHZ MID POWER $2,194.00 $1,645.50 $3,291.00 MOBILE 4a 2 G442A7 ADD: 05 CONTROL HEAD $432.00 $324.00 $648.00 41, 2 067BC ADD: REMOTE MOUNT MID POWER $297.00 $222.75 $445.50 4c 4 W228A ADD: PALM MICROPHONE $72.00 $54.00 $216.00 4d 2 G24AX ENH: 2 YEAR REPAIR SERVICE $121.00 5121.00 $242.00 ADVANTAGE 4e 2 0610AC ADD: REMOTE MOUNT CBL 30 FEET $25.00 $18.75 $37.50 4f 2 G444AE ADD: APX CONTROL HEAD SOFTWARE 4g 2 0174AD ADD: ANT 3DB LOW -PROFILE 762-870 $43.00 $32.25 $64.50 4h 4 BI8CR ADD: AUXILARY SPKR 7.5 WATT $60.00 $45.00 $180.00 4i 2 QA01749AB SW KEY SUPPLEMENTAL DATA - - item Quantity Nomenclature Description List price Your price Extended Price 4i 2 QA02756AC ENH: 9600 OR 3600 SINGLE SYSTEM $1,570.00 $1,177.50 $2,355.00 DIG 4k 2 GA00092AC ADD: DUAL-CONTRL HD HARDWARE $570.00 $427.50 $855.00 5 75 PMLW5657B CARRYACCESSORY-CASE,APX6000 $65.00 $52.00 $3,900.00 CC 2.75 SWLBL 2900&2150MAH 6 75 PMMN4069A IMPRES RSM, 3.5MM JACK, IP55 $110.00 $88.00 $6,600.00 Estimated Tax Amount Total Quote in USD Totals do not include programming or installation costs... $29,316.20 $370,202.20 PO Issued to Motorola Solutions Inc. must: >Be a valid Purchase Order (PO)/Contract/Notice to Proceed on Company Letterhead. Note: Purchase Requisitions cannot be accepted >Have a PO Number/Contract Number & Date >Identify "Motorola Solutions Inc." as the Vendor >Have Payment Terns or Contract Number >Be issued in the Legal Entity's Name >Include a Bill -To Address with a Contact Name and Phone Number >Include a Ship -To Address with a Contact Name and Phone Number >Include an Ultimate Address (only if different than the Ship -To) >Be Greater than or Equal to the Value of the Order >Be in a Non -Editable Format >Identify Tax Exemption Status (where applicable) >Include a Signature (as Required) Quote Number: QU0000309645 MOTOJWOLASOLUTtONS Effective: 12 FEB 2015 Effective To: 13 APR 2015 Bill -To: Ultimate Destination: PASCO POLICE DEPT PASCO POLICE DEPT P O BOX 293 PASCO, WA 99301 United States Attention: Name: Captain Ken Roske Phone: 509 Contract Number: WSCA STANDARD Freight terms: FOB Destination Payment terms: Net 30 Due 525 N 3RD AVE PASCO, WA 99301 United States Sales Contact: Name: Marlon Johnson Email: mjohnson@daywireless.com Phone: 5095478502 Item Quantity Nomenclature Description List price Your price Extended Price l 1 PLN1687D XTL CONSOLETE TONE REMOTE $660.00 $528.00 $528.00 BOARD Estimated Tar Amount Total Quote in USD Totals do not include configuration or installation costs... PO Issued to Motorola Solutions Inc. must: >Be a valid Purchase Order (PO)/Contract/Notice to Proceed on Company Letterhead. >Have a PO Number/Contract Number & Date >Identify "Motorola Solutions Inc." as the Vendor >Have Payment Terms or Contract Number >Be issued in the Legal Entity's Name >Include a Bill -To Address with a Contact Name and Phone Number >Include a Ship -To Address with a Contact Name and Phone Number >Include an Ultimate Address (only if different than the Ship -To) >Be Greater than or Equal to the Value of the Order >Be in a Non -Editable Format >Identify Tax Exemption Status (where applicable) >Include a Signature (as Required) 545.41 $573.41 Note: Purchase Requisitions cannot be accepted Day Wireless Systems 2608 W. Sylvester Pasco, WA 99301 Proposal DAYS WIRELESS SYSTEMS Prepared For. Contact: Address: City/StatelZip: Phone: Pasco Police Department Captain Jeff Harpster 525 N. 3rd Ave. Pasco / WA 199301 545.2483 Mateo 2113/2015 - Aces# - Poll " _Item Das 'tuat -ost Tata1'- 1 16 Install and Program New Motorola APX6500 Mobile Into existing Pasco PD Fleet Vehicle $325.00 $5,200.00 2 16 Faceplate for APX6500 Control Head (Will need to verify existing console for proper fit) $25.00 $400.00 3 1 Program 75 New Motorola APX6000 Portable 813 Motorola APX6500 Mobile Radio Units $1.,520.00 $1,520.00 Not included in the above pricing is to update or modify the current 800mhz PPD Template... Equipment/Labor Note: The proposed labor rate 9s based on work performed during regular business LShipping hours: Monday- Friday 8:OOAM to 5:OOPM Overtime labor rates are higher Subtotal This document, details, and pricing offered herein are confidential and % Sales Tax proprietary to Day Wireless Systems. Use or dissemination of the details of _ this document, including its use in the development of any RFP or solicitation Total $7,120.00 $ 10.00 $ 7,130.00 $ 613.18 $ 7,743.18 for service, are strictly prohibited without the express written approval of Day Wireless Systems. Scope of Work: Installation of new Motorola APX6500 800mhz Radios at Day Wireless Systems (DWS) and Program new Motorola APX6500/APX6000 units with existing Pasco PD I BCES Template (does not include any updates/modifications)... _ > Proposal Vand for 6o Days < Marlon Johnson j Day Wireless Systems I`I 2608 W. Sylvester -- Pasco, WA 99301 DAA Wireless will not be responsible for the following • 1. The cost of diagnosing or eliminating any type of interference caused by, or received by, customer equipment. 2. Delays and or extra costs incurred because of snow or other inclimate unexpected weather conditions. 3. Any unforeseen delays or extra costs brought on by the FCC licensing process or its frequency coordinating agencies. 4. (Force Majeure) Non- performance or delayed performance caused by a third party such as an act of God, labor disturbance, government entity, wind, lightning, or any other similar cause. 5. Extra labor time and or trips caused by our customer or boy other customer sponsored contractor or utility (phone/fiber etc) personnel not being prepared, late to job, or performing their job poorly. 6. Any unexpected or unforeseen customer equipment problems or issues, not included in the Scope of Work, that may potentially need repairs, maintenance, or programming. 7. Day Wireless Systems will not be responsible for any poor performance issues that arise from non DWS Engineered Systems that have been pre planned and requested to be installed by our clients. 8. Electrical AC power availability at all installation sites. 9. Prevailing wages 10. Permits 11. Fees 12. Inspections 13. R-56 upgrades 14. Tower upgrades 15. Structural upgrades 16. General finish repairs 17. Any electrical work 18. Documentation 19. Training 20. Anything not listed in above descriptions. This proposal is based on the performance of labor during regular business hours of 8:00 am through 5:00 pm Monday through Friday. Customer requests for work to be performed outside of these parameters may be accommodated but will be billed at the current over time shop rates unless otherwise noted in this or other valid quotation and or statement of work. All prices quoted herein are limn for 60 days and are based on customer needs and information supplied as of proposal date. If customers specifications or other circumstances change, please contact us for a revised quotation. This quotation supersedes all previous quotations for the same scope of work. In order for a customer to be billed on their own personal or business account after completion of work, customers must have a pre -arranged and established line of credit approved with Day Wireless Systems, Inc. If a customer does not have such a line of credit, a down payment of the full quoted price may be required prior to ordering product or performing any work or services. Taxes All pricing herein Is exclusive of Washington State Sales Tax. Any tax or other governmental charges now, or hereafter levied upon, or measured by the transaction between Day Wireless Systems Inc., and the agency accepting this quotation shall be paid by such person, corporation, or agency accepting this quotation, In addition to any prices quoted or invoiced by Day Wireless Systems, Inc. Payment Terms: Net 10 days from the date Day Wireless Systems receives and invoices equipment. Customers are welcome to inspect equipment to ensure Day Wireless Systems has received equipment and It Is in good working condition. All labor charges are net 10 days after completion of specified work. There will be a 20% re -stocking charge on all returned or canceled orders. FonBdenda/And Proodetarv: This document, details, and pricing offered herein are confidential and proprietary to Day Wireless Systems. Use or dissemination of the details of this document, including Its use In the development of any RFP or solicitation for service, are stric8y prohibited without the express written approval of Day Wireless Systems. Accepted Bv: Date: Thank you for the opportunity to propose quality leading edge products from Day Wireless Systems AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Rick Terway, Director, Admi e & Community Services FROM: Eva Lindgren, Interim Finance Manager SUBJECT: Utility Rate Discussion and Recommendations I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Utility Rates - Proposed Ordinance 2. Utility Rates - Stormwater Rate History February 19, 2015 Workshop Mtg.: 2/23/15 Regular Mtg.: 3/2/15 Id. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 2/23: Discussion 3/2: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , adjusting the stormwater utility rates effective April 1, 2015 and, further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Stormwater Utility IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) For the past several years, utility rates have been analyzed internally on a regular basis and as a result appropriate rate adjustments have been proposed, considered and implemented. In early 2015, the Sewer, Stormwater, and Irrigation utility rates were reviewed, and a planned increase in Water rates was implemented on January 1 of this year. As a result of this review, no changes are proposed with regard to the Sewer and Irrigation utilities. In the case of Sewer, an immediate increase is not required due to the anticipated deferral of some significant capital expenditures. However, a Stormwater rate increase is being proposed. B) STORMWATER. The most recent increase in the stormwater utility rate was implemented in 2014. Changes in federal and state water quality standards and requirements of the City's National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit continue to drive operating costs of the utility. C) Financially, the Stormwater utility is sound. The utility currently has no debt and renews its system using revenues generated almost exclusively through rates. Based upon the utility rate review, an 11.5% increase in base fees ($0.50/month for residential, $4.40 to $4.90) is being proposed for 2015. V. DISCUSSION: A) EXTERNAL RATE STUDIES. Internal reviews of several utility rates have been performed during the past several years and within the past couple of months. Although the information resulting from these studies have been valuable and assisted in maintaining the utilities' fiscal soundness, internal rate studies are limited by the existing in-house expertise and biases which may be inadvertently incorporated into the studies. Even in instances in which a great deal of in- house expertise exists, it is a best practice to outsource utility rate studies periodically. 4(d) It has been determined that it is in the best interest of the City to have an external rate study performed. This is an opportunity to have a firm with extensive expertise in performing utility rate studies to prepare and issue non -biased recommendations. Later in the spring, it is the intent of staff to bring a proposal for a rate study to Council for its approval, in order to ensure that the City will be able to build the recommendations into the 2016 proposed budget. B) STORMWATER. In reviewing the history of Stormwater rates, the proposed 11.5% rate increase clearly follows an existing trend. Starting in 2011, with the exception of 2013, every year has seen a Stormwater rate increase. As noted above, these rate increases are largely being driven by implementation of the federal Clean Water Act and tightening requirements relating to increased infiltration and decreased direct discharge into the Columbia River of the City's NPDES permit as issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology. The costs associated with meeting these requirements are significant and cannot be met with our existing rates. Council and the public can expect to see rates continue to increase in the coming years as programs are implemented and projects are constructed to come into (and maintain) compliance with state and federal regulations. Staff has and will continue to seek outside funding, particularly through grant programs, to lessen rate impacts. ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, amending Pasco Municipal Code Sections 3.07.190, Stormwater Utility. WHEREAS, The City Council has determined that certain amendments to the Stormwater user fees are needed; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, Do Ordain as Follows: Section 1. PMC Section 3.07.190 is amended to read as follows: 3.07.190 STORMWATER UTILITY: Monthly Charges A) Residential Fee/Charge Reference 1) Single -Family Residential (unit) $4.40 $4.90 13.60.070 2) Multi -Family Residential (per unit) $2.20 $2.45 13.60.070 3) Apartments (per unit) $2 28 $2.45 13.60.070 4) Undeveloped parcel (per mo) $0.00 13.60.070 5) Vacant building (per mo) $4:40 $4.90 13.60.070 B) Industrial/Commercial: Fee/Charee Reference 1) Parking for 0 to 5 vehicles (per mo) $448 $4.90 13.60.070 2) Parking for 6 to 10 vehicles (per mo) $8:80 $9.80 13.60.070 3) Parking for 11 to 15 vehicles (per mo) $170 $19.60 13.60.070 4) Parking for 16 plus vehicles (per mo) $22.00 $24.50 13.60.070 5) Additional Charges — property runoff $86.71 $96.66 13.60.070 to City system ($ 1.25 $1.39 Min) per acre 6) State highway right-of-way (WSDOT) $21.71- $23.45 13.60.070 ($0:7$0.84Min) per acre Section 1. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after April 1, 2015 after passage and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular meeting the 2nd day of March, 2015. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney STORM Residential Residential 3.07.190 Storm Water User Fees Rate Inside City Outside City 4.90 Change A) 1) Single family/unit Limits Limits 2002 2.20 $ 1.80 $ 2003 - $ 1.80 $ 2004 - $ 1.80 $ 2005 - $ 1.80 $ 2006 - $ 1.80 $ 2007 - $ 1.80 $ 2008 - $ 1.80 $ 2009 - $ 1.80 $ 2010 - $ 1.80 $ 2011 66.7% $ 3.00 $ 2012 30.0% $ 3.90 $ 2013 0.0% $ 3.90 $ 2014 12.8% $ 4.40 $ 2015 11.5% $ 4.90 $ 3.07.190 Storm Water User Fees 2014 2015 Residential 4.90 B) 2) A) 1) Single family/unit 4.40 4.90 A) 2) Multi Family/unit 2.20 2.45 A) 3) Apartments/unit 2.20 2.45 A) 4) Undeveloped parcel/mo - 16+ spaces A) 5) Vacant building/mo 4.40 4.90 Industrial/Commercial B) 1) Parking 0-5 spaces 4.40 4.90 B) 2) Parking 6-10 spaces 8.80 9.80 B)3) Parking 11-15 spaces 17.60 19.60 B)4) Parking 16+ spaces 22.00 24.50 B) 5) Addtl Chgs: Run off to City System 86.71 96.66 B) 6) Addtl Chgs: State Highway ROW 21.71 23.45 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council TO: Dave Zabell, City Manage FROM: Rick White, �t�1 Community & Economic Development Director 1 SUBJECT: Fire Safety Inspection Program — Update I. REFERENCE(S): February 18, 2015 Workshop Mtg: 2/23/15 1. Fire Safety Inspection Program — Fire Safety Inspection Checklist H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 2/23: DISCUSSION III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. The City of Pasco currently has a Class 5 fire safety raring from the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau but has not had a formal fire safety inspection program since 1987. Since 1987 the City has experienced extraordinary commercial, industrial and residential development and will receive a revised raring from the Washington Survey and Rating Bureau this year. B. Efforts already undertaken to improve the City's rating include automatic aid for building fires, training program improvements, ongoing regionalization of the communications system, smoke detector services, public fire safety educator certification and fire safety education programs, fire investigation certification program and juvenile fire setting intervention. C. In August last year, Council approved implementation of a Fire Safety Inspection Program with the understanding that such a Program will result in the highest chance to maintain the City's Class 5 rating from the Bureau. D. Staff has developed the program and instituted scheduling and inspections as of the first of this year. At Tuesday's Council Workshop, staff will provide a brief status report/presentation of the Program to date. V. DISCUSSION: A. As discussed with Council through a good portion of 2014, the proposed Inspection Program is expected to increase fire safety city-wide and help maintain our existing rating of "Class 5" with the Rating Bureau. Although the Program has been operational only since the first of this year, staff will share results through a Powerpoint presentation for the month of January. 4(e) Building Division Troy Hendren, Inspection Services Manager Business Name: 525 North Third Avenue I Pasco, WA 99301 (509) 543-5736 phone 1 (509) 543-5728 fax Business Address: www.Pasco-WA aov I HendrenTOpasco-wa oov Business License Number: FIRE INSPECTION CHECKLIST Date: Inspector: Access and Premises: Yes No Comments Is actual building use consistent with Occupancy Type? Are Address numbers for the building visible from the street? Does your building have a Knox Box? If so, will the keys inside it open main door? If locks are changed contact City of Pasco Fire Department to install new keys. Is combustible vegetation removed so as to not create a fire hazard? Is there a minimum 3' clearance around fire hydrants and FDC? Egress(Exiting) Yes No Comments Are the exit ways and doors easily recognizable, unobstructed and functional? If the main exit door has key -locking hardware is there a sign above the door that states "THIS DOOR MUST REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED" and are the other exit doors operable from the inside w/o the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort? Are doors with self-closing hinges maintained in the closed position (not blocked open)? Emergency Li htinglEgress Illumination Yes No Comments If emergency lighting is provided, is it maintained in operable condition? Is the means of egress illuminated when the building or structure is occupied? Exit Signs ns Yes No Comments If exit signs are required, are they maintained as illuminated or self -illuminations? Does the back-up battery work? (Push the test button, the exit sign should illuminate under batterypower) Electrical Yes No Comments Are all electrical outlets, switches and junction boxes properly covered with cover plates? Is the electrical system safe from any apparent shock and/or other electrical hazards? Are circuit breakers/fuses labeled so as to identify the area protected? Is the area in front of the electrical panels) clear, by at least 30"? Are extension cards used for temporary use? If multiple items need to be plugged in, is a power tap utilized with a built-in circuit breaker and is the power tap plugged directly into a permanently installed receptacle? Fire Alarm System Yes No Comments If the building is equipped with a fire alarm system, has the required annual service of the fire alarm system been performed by a qualified fire alarm company? .Fire Safety and Evacuation Plans Yes No Comments If drills are required, are they conducted successfully at varying times and under varying conditions and are records maintained on the premises? If required, are evacuation routes and fire safety plans posted? Fire Extinguishers Yes No Comments Is there access to a fire extinguisher(s) rated at a minimum of 2A-10(BC) per 6,000 sq./ft. in low hazard areas and 3,000 sq. ft. in medium hazard areas? Is the travel distance from all portions of the building less than 75'to a fire extinguisher? Are all fire extinguishers visible and accessible (not blocked)? Have the fire extinguisher(s) been serviced/ tagged by a qualified technician within the last 12 Mo's? Is the fire extinguisher(s) properly mounted? Proper locations -near exit doors where possible, not exceeding maximum travel distance, properly mounted (maximum 5' high if less than 40 lbs., maximum 42" high if greater than 40 lbs. Fire/Smoke Separations Yes No Comments Are the fire/smoke separations (smoke doors, ere doors, walls, etc.) maintained in working condition? Is storage maintained a minimum of 18" below head deflectors in fire sprinklered areas? If the building is equipped with a fire sprinkler system, has the required annual service of the fire sprinkler system been performed in the last year by a qualified sprinkler company? In the commercial cooking applications, has the hood suppression system been serviced in the last six months and is the hood cleaned at intervals to prevent the accumulation of grease? Heat producing appliances Yes No Comments If portable electric heaters are used, are they used safely, are they UL listed? Are they plugged directly into wall outlets and kept a minimum of 3' away from combustibles. House Keeping and Decoration Yes No Comments Is combustible rubbish that is stored in containers outside of vault storage rooms removed from the building a minimum of once each working day? Are oily rags or similar materials stored in metal, metal lined or other approved containers equipped with tight fitting covers? Mechanical Hazards Yes No Comments Is the venting for exhaust products of combustion working properly for gas appliances? (Le.: water heaters, furnaces, etc.) Smoke Detectors Yes No Comments If smoke detection is required in common areas such as corridors or part of the fire alarm system, have they been tested in the last year by a qualified technician? Stor a of Combustibles Yes No Comments Are Combustible materials not stored beneath the building or structure? Are the boiler rooms, mechanical rooms and electrical panel rooms maintained free of all combustible's If you have storage of compressed gas containers (such as Cot, helium, etc.) are they chained to prevent falling? Storage of Combustible and Flammable Liquids Yes No Comments Are quantities in excess of 10 gallons of flammable and combustible liquids used for maintenance purposes and the operation of equipment stored in liquid storage cabinets? A "No" response to any of these questions indicates the presence of a fire code violation. Completion of this form does not eliminate all fire inspections conducted by the City of Pasco. Please call 545-3442 for a re -inspection within 10 business days. ,,, AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council February 18, 2015 TO: Dave Zabell, City Manager Workshop Meeting.: 2/23/15 Rick White, Community & Economic Development Directorq4A FROM: Shane O'Neill, Planner I SUBJECT: STREET VACATION (MF# VAC 2015-003) Kurtzman Alley Vacation Plan I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Kurtzman Alley Vacation - Overview Map 2. Kurtzman Alley Vacation - Vicinity Map II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 2/23: DISCUSSION: III. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. The Kurtzman's First Addition and Acre Park Addition neighborhoods were platted in the early 1900's with 20 foot wide alleys, many of which were never improved to provide access to the rear of properties. Many years ago portions of the alleys north of Alton Street were vacated, leaving behind 10 foot wide alleys. To address the issue of illegal refuse dumping Staff has developed a plan to vacate some of the neighborhood alleys. B. The Kurtzman neighborhood has been the location for a concerted effort by the City to physically improve the public infrastructure. The Community Development Block Grant program has funded the majority of LID's 146, 148 and 149 for street improvements and for the Kurtzman pool demolition and spray park installation. C. Staff has conducted two neighborhood meetings whereby affected property owners were invited to discuss the proposed alley vacation. Comments received during the meetings together with phone conversations with property owners indicated general support of the plan to vacate certain alleys. D. Although the public hearing for this matter has been set for March 16, 2015, this item is a little unusual as it involves multiple properties. Staff brings this matter to Council to provide an opportunity for discussion/questions, 4(f) - t 'st<;a �fMK rrwSIYt4. ,: 9!-,i+,.F§t�9 a�"..fi�'•e r�,'aF#s:.� w.P�;.w '.� .t, � xra fit,,. .. Y f �A I1 r X' )x3 R . r�, I t ' f,z � t..- wy, zb I �.-r ,7..:N ks,7 •i..Q � r��r �` IZA:sr{% �.:. 4# IWI Rt, i e '. '� .. � eT•.=.ti Y{ w'a'x z %.l �i ..w 1 � a iii. ---r- - � , __'. ,--;� ��} -i�dt� I aP/a 4i_ �f: �•"+ r�� ` r. x Srr��f �% w t. who, A; S✓ � ]`. ^f'✓�C � � ,� �.'. - Alit! t , 3 S. '�j8, ;— ee 33 is _ I . v _ jj