Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPasco-Kittelson ITS Master Plan 3-17-14 City of Pasco Washington CITYWIDE SIGNAL SYSTEM & COMMUNICATIONS MASTER PLAN March 2014 CITY OF PASCO mow 1a � KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G IN E E R I N G/P L A N N I N G MOVINOFORWARDTHINKINO '" KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES , INC . T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 610 SW Alder Street, Suite 700, Portland, OR 97205 503.228.5230 503.273.8169 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Date: March 3, 2014 Project#:12839 To: Ahmad Qayoumi, P.E. From: Shaun Quayle, P.E. &John Ringert, P.E. cc: Khoa Truong, P.E.,Jesse Rice EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Kittelson & Associates, Inc. in cooperation with the City of Pasco engineering and information services (IS) staff have prepared this high-level summary of the signal system and communication architecture to provide the basis for developing projects that result in an integrated traffic management system the meets the existing and future traffic management needs of the City of Pasco.These needs identified by City of Pasco traffic, IS, emergency services and consulting staff are: • Consistent traffic signal cabinet and controller equipment. • Ethernet-based central to field communications to control and monitor signal controllers, video surveillance cameras and future ITS equipment. • Traffic signal control equipment that can provide advanced functionality, traffic monitoring, and coordination strategies that improve operations and reduce delay to users. • Video surveillance of key roadway facilities. • Equipment capable of communicating as a system, including with Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) traffic signal controllers, and support the latest national standards. • In addition, using an open signal controller hardware platform standard in the 2070 allows for changes in future operating systems and/or local signal control software platforms. In addition to these needs, the architecture must leverage existing infrastructure and opportunities as appropriate to maintain cost efficiency and be implementable over time. Proposed System Architecture In order to meet the City needs, the system architecture is based on two primary components. The first component is the intersection control equipment architecture and specifications which directly control the signal operations at each intersection. The second component is the system communication FILENAME.-C.•I USERSI VALDEZ71APPDATA I LOCAL I MICROSOFTI WINDOWSI TEMPORARYINTERNET FILESI CONTENT OUTLOOKI4JYUOILL I PASCO-KITTELSON ITS MASTERPLAN ARCHITECTURE SUMMARY MEMO 3MAR2014.DOCX Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 2 architecture that provides for the operation of the intersections as a system and allows the City staff to monitor and control the system from City Hall. The intersection architecture is based on a single traffic signal controller software that can be used throughout the City signal system at intersections that continue to have the existing TS1 signal cabinets as well as the newer TS2 cabinets. This approach will provide the ability to leverage the existing traffic signal cabinets. This approach will use modern controller central and local software already competitively procured by the City (Econolite Centracs and ASC/3 software/firmware) and the replacement of outdated Traconex TMP 390 signal controllers. The new signal equipment should support coordination with WSDOT traffic signals. The communication architecture will be a cutting-edge system composed of high capacity fiber-optic communication between the traffic management center (TMC) to key corridors within the City and to video surveillance cameras. The fiber-optic backbone communication system will consist of a small amount of existing city-owner fiber-optic lines and a majority of leased fiber-optic capacity from existing communication providers. Some new short sections of communication are necessary to link all traffic signals onto this advanced communications network, as shown in Figure 1 in pink. The linkages may occur through fiber (leased or owned) or short point to point wireless communications. This predominately high-capacity fiber-optic wired communications approach provides the necessary high- capacity required for video surveillance and long distance communications while minimizing the capital cost to build communication to individual intersections. Leased fiber avoids the costs of right-of-way acquisitions and additional environmental, engineering, and specialized maintenance costs to expand a large City-owned fiber optic network. Figure 1 illustrates the Citywide Signals and Communication Master Plan for locations and treatments within the City of Pasco. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 3 Figure 1 - Pasco Citywide Signals &Communications Map FILENAME.-C.•IUSERSI VALDEZJIAPPDATAILOCALIMICROSOFTIWINDOWS1TEMPORARYINTERNETFI LESI CONTENT OUTLOOKJ4JYUOILL1PASCO-KITTELSON ITS MASTERPLAN- ARCHITECTURE SUMMARY MEMO 3MAR2014.DOCX Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 4 CI'T'Y OF PASCO SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS & COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM YAKIMA RIVER lee L =CITY LIMTIS •---J"-�-� S =FLASHING BEACON `� a =COP SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION =STATE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION — - i =PROPOSED SIGNALIZED INTERSEC770N ---=FUTURE ROADWAY ~`� -- • Y � I� =FUTURE ROUNDABOUT Q=V1DE0(PIZCAMERA) 10-EXIS77NG FIBER DROP* -PROPOSED FIBER DROP* r \ — =PUD FIBER EXIST* =FUTURE COMMUNICATION CONNECTION* y (IFFIEEKINCLUDENEWDROPNEIR SIGNAL CAB/NE7) • ' =PERMANENT TRAVEL TIME V. SPEED, 1 ORIGIN-DES77NA77ON SYSTEM(BLUETOOTH j C�=R47TERYEACKUPSYSTEM *-ENHANCED TRAFFIC SIGNAL DETECTION S •AI.I.COAIAIUNICATfON LINKS SURI£.CTTOCHANGF,RASFOONSnT.' -^-�-� wO1 • SURVEY TESTING&ViUJDA7TON. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 5 It should be noted that this architecture and master plan is a working document and subject to change and updates as technology changes and/or system integration/implementation, validation, and verification are completed. As the communications system is expanded and brought on-line, additional refinement of the system is necessary to determine the location-specific appropriate communication technology (wireless, fiber drop, etc.) and placement of infrastructure such as IP-based surveillance cameras. Figure 1 identifies the envisioned camera surveillance locations and existing or new fiber drop locations to connect onto the leased (Franklin County Public Utilities District) existing fiber network. Key System Components The key components of the ultimate City of Pasco Traffic Signal and Communications System are listed in Table 1. Table 1 City of Pasco Signal System Components System Component Recommended Specification Signal Cabinet NEMA TS2 Type 1 (Optional is battery back-up system) Signal Controller • NWS M1 Controller • Interim Transition • 2070EN(adhering to CALTRANS specification for 2070E • New/Retrofit controllers,2N field I/O module for TS2 Type 1 cabinet) Local Signal Controller Firmware Econolite ASC/3 or Cobalt Controller Firmware Traffic Signal Central System Econolite Centracs Communication Standard Ethernet/IP Trunk Communication to TMC Fiber Optic(Leased or City-owned) Communication between Intersections . Fiber-Optic Cable(Leased or City-owned) • Primary • point-to-Point/Point to Multipoint Wireless Spread • Secondary Spectrum 2.4-5.8 GHz Surveillance Cameras Pan-Tilt-Zoom(PTZ),Ethernet IP Based Traffic Management Center Communications City Managed Network External City Access City Managed Network Each project to implement this Architecture Master Plan will call out specific design elements to tailored specifications (e.g. Road 68 Improvement/Interconnect Project). ITS technology changes quickly, so items such as traffic detection, battery back-up/power conditioning, and other elements will be identified on a project by project basis. Implementation Recommendations Upcoming construction projects should make use of the Traffic Signal System/ITS specifications in Table 1. Proof of concept and the first implementation is expected on upcoming major City roadway construction projects. In addition, the system can be implemented as geographic-specific projects occur or as a part of larger system-wide ITS projects. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 6 For the first project, further refinement of the signal system component specification to specific project area and scope is recommended, so that these components can be specified for contracting and design purposes. In addition, a specific testing plan for the verification and validation of the components is recommended to ensure the procured system meets the specifications that enable the defined outcomes and needs in this document. Future projects can follow this similar process, although the system requirements and testing plan may need to be modified based on the lessons learned with the first system implementation. The priority corridors will be established by City staff. We recommend implementing them geographically and leveraging projects as available. The following is a prioritized list of traffic signal components to enable the City engineering staff's desired system outcomes. Networking and communication configuration will be an overarching element of each component. 1. Update Cabinets & Controllers: Consistent, Ethernet-capable signal cabinets (NEMA TS2 Type 1), network Ethernet switches, fiber termination panels, and type 2070EN traffic signal controllers 2. Consistent signal controller software: capable of supporting advanced features such as smart preemption, priority, dynamic flashing yellow arrow controls, performance logging, and an internal logic processor, as well as interfacing with desired City signal central software program. 3. Signal to TMC Communications along the corridor for interconnect and a fiber pathway (leased drop) back to City engineering traffic management center (TMC) for central control and monitoring. 4. Establish traffic signal preemption and traffic signal coordination, as appropriate. 5. Pan Tilt Zoom video surveillance cameras and backend equipment at TMC to manage, control and display images. 6. Flashing yellow arrow signal heads to reduce delay and/or reduce crashes. 7. Central traffic signal and ITS system management software to interface with signal controller software seamlessly and allow for remote monitoring, timing changes, communication status, alarms, video monitoring, and performance monitoring in an enterprise (multi-user access fashion) 8. Preemption/priority central management system to remotely track, log and monitor preemption and priority requests from centralized location. 9. Countdown pedestrian signal heads, where appropriate. 10. ADA pedestrian treatments, such as accessible pedestrian push-buttons and addition of ADA compliant ramps and sidewalk, as appropriate. 11. Establish reliable traffic signal detection capable of withstanding Pasco weather conditions and rated to last at least 10 years. 12. Install battery back-up systems for strategic locations to provide a minimum of 2 hours of full-color signal operations in case of power interruption/loss and fit within a NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet. 13. Procure and/or install travel time, speed and origin-destination data system to provide real-time feedback on system operations. Note, this list is at the high-level concept level; City needs and project scope can redefine system priorities. For example, if a corridor is able to implement the communication system elements (fiber or Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 7 wireless interconnect) prior to a cabinet and controller switch out, then available NWS M1 controllers could be implemented in the interim to enable Ethernet communications and signal coordination. This City signal systems and communications architecture is subject to refinement/addition by City staff and other stakeholders& thus is considered a working document. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 8 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND The City of Pasco desires to upgrade their traffic signal control system to enable the following defined outcomes, per discussions with City staff: o Establish a consistent and modern NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet standard and 2070 controller standard to simplify the management of the system, while supporting added safety and traffic operations functionality. o Quality signal coordination through reliable traffic signal interconnect and common hardware/firmware platforms that supports coordination with adjacent WSDOT intersections. o Remote signal timing plan upload/download via a reliable traffic signal communication system. o Remote traffic operations via video surveillance and a reliable traffic signal communication system for City engineering staff, as well as other City public stakeholders (e.g. Fire, Police). o Ability to prioritize users of the system at the traffic controller, through emergency vehicle preemption and transit signal priority. o Ability to provide at least 2 hours of full-color battery back-up power supply at strategic intersection to enhance safety. o Ability to track vehicle travel times, speeds and origin-destinations between strategic locations to understand trends and patterns for performance monitoring. o Advanced controller capabilities, such as event/dynamic timing parameters, controller logging of quality of signal timing and infrastructure health performance, and smart signal preemption and priority features. These outcomes help support the City of Pasco in developing a safe and efficient transportation system for the movement of goods and people. The City plans to leverage this architecture and concept of operations, along with system specifications to implement a modernized traffic signal cabinet, controller, communication and ITS system within the City's Information Services (IS)-managed network. Proof of concept and the first implementation is expected on the next major City roadway construction project. In addition, the system can be implemented as geographic-specific projects occur, like Road 68, or as a larger system-wide ITS project. EXISTING CONDITIONS The City of Pasco currently has no interconnect, remote communications, or signal coordination capabilities for their 46 traffic signals owned and operated by the City. The majority (41 of 46) of traffic signal cabinets are of the older National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) TS1 standard, along with older Traconex (TMP) 390 NEMA signal controllers. The newest City of Pasco signals include Northwest Signal M1 controllers and the recommended NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinets. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 9 Appendix "A" provides a Citywide inventory of traffic signal system components, including installation year, controller, cabinet, conflict monitor, number of detection channels, load switches, poles & pole types, and vehicle/ped heads. The City of Pasco currently leases space on the extensive Franklin Public Utilities District (PUD) fiber network for purposes other than traffic control. Note the PUD owns and operates street lighting within Pasco. Appendix "8"includes a map of the existing wired communication infrastructure within the City of Pasco. The City of Pasco has an extensive 2.4 GHz and 4.9 GHz wireless radio system for water control and public service networks, respectively. While the City of Pasco does not have communications or interconnect between their traffic signals, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) does utilize wireless interconnect for coordination of traffic signals on interchanges in Pasco. There is currently no emergency traffic signal preemption capability for the fire or other emergency providers, with the exception of the newest traffic signal at Argent Road and Saraceno Way. NEEDS AND FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS The City of Pasco desires to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of their traffic signal system. To promote the effectiveness of their traffic signal system; the following needs were identified by the City of Pasco staff: • Modern Signal Operations Capability • Coordinated signal timing on arterial roadways • Coordination with City and WSDOT signals • Emergency vehicle pre-emption • Advanced timing features to reduce congestion & enhance safety (e.g. dynamic flashing yellow arrow) • Smart controller logging to understand quality of signal timing and functionality/health of infrastructure • Potential to implement the following functions: • Transit management—potential transit signal priority • Freight management— potential truck signal priority • Controller firmware logic processor to allow for custom future solutions • Remote Communications and Monitoring Capability • Centralized upload/download and monitoring • Communication with management center, signal maintenance, and City police, fire, and City Hall. • Incident Management • Video surveillance at high priority locations • Tie emergency services to central control (preemption &video surveillance) Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 10 o Performance monitoring system at strategic locations to understand travel times, speeds and origin-destinations within the City of Pasco network • Utilize the latest interoperability standards for ITS components to the extent possible; such as NTCIP and TOP standards. To the extent that existing infrastructure enables this functionality, it should be prioritized for expansion, unless there are specific reasons identified for the change. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE There is no developed ITS architecture specific to the City of Pasco. The Washington Statewide ITS Architecture' includes generic statements of regional partnerships between WSDOT and City TMC's to: • Maintain a seamless integration between the WSDOT TMC's and City traffic management efforts, particularly due to congestion, incidents and construction. • Better disseminate traffic information and to coordinate potential alternate route usage to minimize the impact of a freeway incident on surface street traffic. • Provide more complete traveler information to citizens, including camera images and road closures. The proposed City of Pasco centralized, remote traffic signal timing control & video surveillance called out in Figure 1 and within this architecture concept for the City of Pasco will aid in achieving these endeavors. A connection back to the WSDOT South Central TMC has yet to occur to the City of Pasco TMC, but could occur in the future. For simplicity sake, the national ITS Architecture diagram is used to define the key components of the Pasco Signal System Architecture. While the national ITS diagram contains many different concepts, it is helpful in ensuring consistency in how ITS elements are classified within four types of sub-systems. The diagram is also useful in identifying the type of communication options that might be applicable between the sub-systems. Shown in Figure 2 are the system architecture elements with the primary applicable elements for this City of Pasco Architecture circled. 1 Washington Statewide ITS Architecture, December 2002, IBI Group Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 11 Figure 2—Pasco Architecture Elements Circled on the National ITS Architecture Travelers Centers Traffic Fmergency Payment Com met aal Maintenance& Mann merit Management Adminlstratlon Vehide Construction Remote Arirn it)ist rdt ion Management Traveler -- support I Liformalion Emissions Transit neet and Archived Data service Management Management Freight Management Persnnal Provider Mdra ernerrt In forma do n AL s Lb I — Wide Area Wireless(Mobile)Communications— Fixed Point—Fixed Point Communications Vehicle Roadway c st Eme envy Senirity Vehicle Mnrninnn;r E E Comm rdal rg Rnddwdy Vehide a, Payment v Transit Parking Lg� Vehicle i., Management L N y Intenanoe " Cornrne.mal Construction Vehide Vehide Vehicles Field Chcck As shown in Figure 2, the key connection between the roadway/signal in the field and the traffic management center (TMC) is typically a fixed point-to-point communication and the communication between the vehicles would be to the field through in-vehicle communications. In Pasco's architecture, the traffic management center will likely be comprised of a server(s) and work stations containing software to serve as the archived data management (e.g. Econolite Centracs). The roadway architecture components will include modern traffic signal cabinets & equipment, controllers, surveillance cameras, emergency vehicle preemption elements, transit signal priority elements (priority request server/phase discriminator), and freight management elements, such as truck signal priority. Communication Needs Table 2 summarizes the primary communication purposes, associated data type, and typical data capacity. Based on input from city staff, the following data communication needs were identified. Table 2 City Communication Needs Communication Purpose Data Type Data • Traffic data Signal Communications • Timings 2-20Kbps • Status Video Detection System • Detector data/picture 3—10 Mbps Pan-Tilt-Zoom(PTZ)Camera • Camera control 2-20 Kbps • Video picture 3-10 Mbps Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 12 As shown in Table 2, most of the communications needs are relatively low-bandwidth transfer of data to/from the intersections remotely from the City of Pasco traffic management center. It is expected that some pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) traffic surveillance cameras will be installed, but those are expected to be in a handful of key locations. For those locations, a high-bandwidth communication method will be required. Communication Standard The most common type of communication network is Gigabit Ethernet because of its wide usage in common applications such as office and home. This standard is common and can be used for fiber- optic, twisted-pair copper wire, and wireless communication options. For most installations, an Ethernet switch will be installed at each intersection or other device location and will interface directly with the traffic signal controller or other devices (e.g. PTZ cameras). For legacy equipment that does not have an Ethernet port, the signals will need to be converted using an RS 232 to Ethernet converter. Because of the common usage of Ethernet and the reasonable cost, it is recommended as the standard for communication for the City of Pasco traffic signal system. Field-to-Center Communications Options The fixed point-to-point communications generally fall into two categories which are wired and wireless. Within the wired category are fiber-optic and copper communication options. Wired communication typically includes providing either fiber-optic or copper wire located in an underground conduit or attached overhead to power poles. The major cost of installing this type of communication options is installation. Wireless communications range in types but are most commonly unlicensed broadband and spread spectrum. Table 3 has a general comparison of the communication options between field intersections and the TMC. As described in Table 3, there are advantages and disadvantages of wired and wireless communication options. The most notable advantages of the wireless communications are the low cost and flexibility to install it without significant construction within the right-of-way. For a brand new system that is wired, fiber-optic communications would likely be the preferred choice for the main communication connections and potentially all the signals. The most notable advantage of fiber-optic wired communications is reliability and the high data transfer capability. The high data transfer capability is most important for high quality video. Many local agencies that utilize video throughout their signal system focus exclusively on fiber communications. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 13 Table 3 Comparison of Communication Options Roadway Advantages Disadvantages Wired Communication • High data capacity • Expensive due to conduit installation($10,000- (Gbps) $100,000 per intersection,depending on run • Good for high-quality length&right of way) Fiber Optics video • Requires equipment to convert analog into light- encoded signal • Good for backbone or . Maintenance and repair costs can be high if trunk communications damaged • Reliable and common • Expensive due to conduit installation($10,000— Twisted Pair Copper • Moderate capacity (45+ $100,000 per intersection,depending on run length&right of way) Mbps) • Much lower capacity than fiber Wireless Communications • Low cost($4,000-$8,000 per intersection) • Moderate capacity (100kbps-300 Mbps) • Sensitive to line-of-sight obstructions Wireless Spread • Flexibility to change • Much lower capacity than fiber Spectrum/Broadband configuration or add • Not as reliable for video transmission;particularly intersections if more than one hop from a wired connection. • Ease of installation without impact to right- of-way Because the City does not already have conduit installed for traffic signal interconnect, the cost for installing wired communications would be expensive. Given an estimated cost in the range of $10,000 to $25,000 per intersection, it is estimated the cost to install conduit to the entire system would be approximately $500,000 to $1,500,000 to establish a City-owned fiber system, not including right-of- way costs which could be significant. An entirely new Wireless-only communication system would be a much lower cost at $200,000 to $400,000 depending on the specific type and technology. The wireless alternative also doesn't have the installation issues that can come from installing underground conduit along private property frontages and through interchanges. The most significant two downsides to wireless communications are: 1) difficulty in areas without a good line of sight between intersections; and 2) lack of capacity for multiple video devices as compared with fiber optic communications. A cursory review of the Pasco's topography confirmed that most areas of the City have good line of sight between intersections and between high points such as City hall and the water tower along Road 68. As part of reviewing the requirements outlined in Section 2.1 with City staff, it was identified that video monitoring is envisioned to occur at approximately no more than 15 locations in the City. It should be noted that the City does own ESTEEM 2.4 GHz wireless radios and 4.9 GHz wireless radios in use for irrigation/water controls and a wireless connection between the Water Tower near Road 68, Courthouse/City Hall, and the Operations Center. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 14 City IS staff has indicated that fiber is currently being leased from the Franklin PUD's extensive network within the City of Pasco (see Appendix B for map) for other City department use and that tying into that fiber network would be a relatively effective, low-cost method to lease access to a very high-capacity, reliable fiber system. In discussions with City IS staff, it appears leasing the fiber for traffic signal system uses would likely be on a monthly basis on a data transmission threshold and by number of "drops" or access points onto their network. Based on discussions with fiber resellers, an estimated cost for 6 locations as part of the Road 68 interconnect project was quoted at approximately $3,000 for construction, $336 per month for the first site and $35 per month port charge for the other 5 sites, based on a 100mb shared connection. Recommended Hybrid Communication Architecture Given the existing infrastructure and needs of the traffic signal system communications, a leased fiber approach is recommended, with wireless radio connections as the back-up or secondary medium to implement on an as needed basis. This recommended approach is illustrated in concept in Figure 1, which: • Leverages existing fiber drops onto the PUD network to provide a robust connection into the City network at the Traffic Operations Center to pull back high-definition video images, as well as traffic signal data. • Adds new connections (shown in pink in Figure 1), which could be drops onto the PUD fiber- optic network, and some limited new City-owned fiber connections or wireless connections to the existing PUD fiber-optic network to connect to all traffic signals within the City of Pasco. Franklin PUD Fiber Drops Figure 1 illustrates the expected existing or future fiber optic drop locations onto leased PUD fiber to enable the envisioned communications networking to nearly all intersections. Locations shown in pink require a connection to existing PUD fiber and could be accomplished through fiber optic cable extension (PUD or City-owned) or wirelessly. As shown in Appendix B, the PUD leased fiber is a mix of aerial and buried fiber-optic cable. The City should work with the PUD to negotiate appropriate interfaces between the traffic signal controller cabinet and their fiber network (e.g. mid-span entries, vault / splice access locations). The PUD fiber-optic cable network has redundant pathways for many of the signalized intersection locations creating redundancy to increase up-time of the communication system and reliability of the network. Projects which include fiber-optic communications should have experienced designers and contractors for fiber-optic installation, coordination with PUD maintenance staff, testing/validation, and training capabilities as necessary. 2 Per February 6, 2014 email from Jesse Rice,City IS manager in reference to PUD reseller email quote Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 15 Wireless Radio Communications (Secondary Alternative) The wireless communications would primarily serve a limited or back-up role in the City's communication infrastructure. It may be used in the following fashion: • Local to local traffic signal (point to point link) • Local traffic signal to fiber connected point, such as the Water Tower near Road 68 or City Hall or Courthouse (point to point or point to multipoint link) Discussions with City IS staff indicate a preference for a fixed routing (single pathway) system, rather than a MESH style system. As a starting point, Table 4 shows a comparison of four different manufacturers devices, based on most current information available. Table 4 Wireless Communication Equipment Comparisons Wireless Device Bandwidth Range Data Capacity Notes • Used currently by City ESTEEM 2.4,4.9,and 5.8 GHz Up to 54 Mbps of Pasco • Local vendor • Used by other agencies ENCOM COMMPAK 2.4,4.9,and 5.8 GHz Up to 54 Mbps in Washington • On a WSDOT statewide contract. • Not as common as the ENCOM products but Intuicom Nitro58 5.8 GHz Up to 108 Mbps considered one of the leaders in this technology. • Highest data capacity • Recently installed in LA and San Jose for signal Proxim Broadband 8100/8150 4.9,5.3,5.4 and 5.8 GHz Up to 200 Mbps system. • Not as common as the ENCOM products in Washington. All of the wireless devices shown in Table 4, have similar costs in the range of $2,000 to $3,000 per intersection for the radio and antenna assuming each intersection only sends a signal back to a base station. In order to chain intersections together, two radios are typically required which can vary in cost but are generally in the range of$3,000 to $4,000 per intersection with two radios. As shown in Table 3, the options identified for comparison operate with approximately the same bandwidth range but have different data capacities. All are generally 4.9 GHZ or 5.8 GHZ technology. The 4.9 GHz band is already defined as a common band for ITS applications although in discussions with vendors and the City of San Jose, that bandwidth can be too busy so use of 5.8 GHz is common. It should be noted that specific radio devices will need to be demonstrated and tested/validated prior to their integration into the traffic signal system network. This process should occur in collaboration with IS staff who will manage the traffic signal and ITS network. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 16 In a wireless communications alternative, the conceptual layout utilizes the roof of City Hall to communicate with the signals in the downtown. Under this wireless scenario, it is assumed that a set of transmitters and receivers on City Hall will transmit to a location on each nearby arterial (within line of sight). A similar approach of line of sight transmitting point to point/multipoint from the Road 68 Water Tower to nearby traffic signals. Between the majority of traffic signals, data will be transmitted wirelessly via a point-to-point connection in a "daisy chain" fashion, ultimately back to a fiber drop point or directly to the roof of City Hall. This "daisy chain" approach requires two radios in each cabinet. An alternate option is to have poi nt-to-multipoint units on City Hall with one radio per cabinet, but that requires a clear line of sight to every signal antenna which can be difficult to obtain. For the area around Road 68, a point-to-multipoint transmitter will be located on the water tower. This area may require some intersections to be connected point-to-point due to sight obstructions. While wireless communication is not the primary proposed communications medium, it could become the primary medium if leased fiber costs become too great or use of wireless connectivity in a redundant role is a reasonable long-term strategy for select connections. Local Intersection Architecture Figure 3 illustrates the expected traffic signal communications system at each signalized intersection in Pasco. They will have an Ethernet switch to connect the Ethernet-based traffic signal controllers, IP- based PTZ cameras, and a connection via fiber to a nearby PUD drop onto leased fiber communications. Figure 1—Typical Signalized Intersection ITS Components AP1 Cabinet A PTZ Cabinet �\ �PTZ Controller Con oiler i Ethe� = Ethernet O Switch PUD Fiber Switch PUD Fiber Typical Intersection Drop Typicallntersection Drop Primary Fiber-Optic Alternative Secondary Fiber/Wireless Alternative The conceptual architecture calls out the expected communication links and mediums in Figure 1, but they are subject to refinement and validation/verification. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 17 Back-Office Architecture This back office architecture is a high-level concept and is subject to the specifications of the City IS staff regarding network set-up, access, and etc. This Citywide architecture concept envisions the advanced traffic management system (ATMS) being hosted on two different servers, the traffic signals central system server (Econolite Centracs) & a separate video server at the TMC, as illustrated in Figure 4 . These servers may also operate additional traffic operations management software, such as a Preemption/Priority Management System (e.g. GTT Central Management Software TM), power management/battery monitoring software for battery back-up systems, and/or a permanent BluetoothTM travel time, speed, and origin-destination system (e.g. Digiwest BlueMACTM) Figure 2—Conceptual Back-Office Traffic Signals ITS Network Components Maintenance/Police Users Pasco City Hall m 2 _ 2 N - f6 w _C 'L m Z Signals Server U USefS Video Server As shown in Figure 4, City IS staff expects to manage this new traffic signal & video surveillance communication system on a common city managed network infrastructure. They will control access to users and the "center to center" access rights for maintenance staff(operations center) and emergency providers, such as police/fire. City staff will develop a policy around video data recording, as well as access and control (pan, tilt, zoom) rights to users within the City of Pasco Traffic Signal & Video Systems (ATMS). A wired connection is expected between the traffic engineering department, maintenance staff at the operations center, and police inside City Hall. Conceptual Communication Network Layout As shown in Figure 1, communications between signals is proposed to be exclusively via fiber-optics in this architecture (mostly leased), with the caveat that any construction project where installation of City-owned wired fiber-optic cables communications is possible at a lower cost (e.g. open soil to trench and bury new conduit as opposed to costly directional drilling and boring)should be pursued. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 18 This allows the City to build out their own fiber network saving costs (avoid monthly service changes to lease from Franklin PUD) and enhances the robustness of the linkages within the traffic signal network. TRAFFIC SIGNAL CABINET & EQUIPMENT As described in Appendix A, the signal system inventory revealed a large number of outdated traffic signal controllers (TMP 390); yet relatively newer NEMA TS1 cabinets. The desire of the City of Pasco is to modernize the traffic signal cabinets and equipment to support an Ethernet-based communication system and advanced signal timing features, and sufficient detection channels to effectively monitor and support the advanced signal timing features. Appendix C illustrates the identified needs and system requirements established by the City for the selection of a preferred traffic signal controller hardware/firmware, central management system (ATMS), PTZ cameras, and video management system. Traffic Signal Cabinet The existing TS1 traffic signal cabinets limit the functionality of the traffic signal controller and are not fully compatible with most modern traffic signal controllers, without an adaptor. To this end, we recommend making the NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet the new City preferred option for all new or retrofit projects, matching recent City of Pasco project construction practice. The TS2 Type 1 cabinet will provide additional detection channels (up to 64), which is helpful for supporting advanced features, such as lane by lane detection, or detailed performance measures. In addition, the NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet establishes diagnostics to enhance safety, provides for detector health monitoring through the SDLC port, redundant MMU functionality, simplifies cabinet wiring due to the SDLC port, and defines an open architecture for future ATMS/ITS equipment, using NTCIP protocol. Planning level cost estimate is between $12,000 and $15,000 per cabinet for a NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet. Figure 5 shows a recent NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet in the City of Pasco at Burden / Road 68. Figure 3—NEMA TS2 Type 1 Cabinet at Road 68/Burden i 7 1� - ,1 i1 r Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 19 Traffic Signal Controller & Firmware While most of the recent new controller installations have implemented an NWS M1 hardware controller, we recommend implementing a Model 2070EN (CalTrans specification) for controller hardware for future implementations with the NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet guidance recommended earlier. A Model 2070EN controller includes the "lite" serial backplate, chassis including its own CPU module and three optional 1/0 modules; which provide future flexibility through the 2070 standard to switch firmwares in the future or upgrade the operating system from OS/9 to Linux, as necessary for desired controller functionality. A model 2070EN controller could be installed in a NEMA TS1 cabinet, but would require an interface module creating another point of failure; so this option is not recommended. Figure 6 illustrates a model 2070EN controller. The 2070EN supports Ethernet-based communications. Figure 4—Model 2070EN Traffic Signal Controller(to be installed with NEMA TS2 Type 1 Cabinets) a MOOE12070 . 7M .ain •iF.Dp WJ�ic TM.cWn9 Source:www.mccain-inc.com Through a competitive bid process, Econolite ASC/3 — Cobalt controller firmware and Econolite Centracs central traffic signal software was selected for its ability to support key City signal timing endeavors (see Appendix C for details), which include: • Signal coordination • Remote upload/download • Event scheduling capabilities • Data key for timing backup and field • Emergency vehicle & rail preemption restoration (2070EN feature) • Transit &truck signal priority • Performance logging, including alarms • Adaptive features • Internal logic processor for custom • Dynamic flashing yellow arrow functionality In addition, WSDOT south central region intersections that have 2070 controllers (Road 68, Road 100, and Argent interchanges) but currently operate with a different controller firmware (NWS Voyage). Exploration of getting the WSDOT and City controllers to stay in sync via time-based coordination or via direct communication should occur with early implementation projects. The most effective strategy should be carried forward for future implementations. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 20 Planning level cost estimates for a new Model 2070EN controller with the recommended Econolite ASC/3 - Cobalt firmware is approximately$4,000. Ethernet IP-Based Network Switch All traffic signals should include an Ethernet, IP-based field-hardened network switch to support multiple IP-based ITS devices (e.g. traffic signal controller, PTZ camera). The network switch shall be fully managed and include both Fast Ethernet Ports (10/100 BaseTX) and Fiber-Optical Gigabit Ethernet Ports (1000BaseX) to support multiple communication mediums. Traffic Signal Central System With the modernization of traffic signal controller, firmware and other equipment (e.g. Ethernet switches, PTZ cameras), an upgrade of the traffic signal central management system or advanced traffic management system (ATMS) was in order. The ATMS needs to be seamlessly integrated with the selected controller firmware (Econolite ASC3 or Cobalt) to support signal timing management, upload, download, and alerts, support multiple communication mediums, display of video images, and logging/tracking of system performance in easy to understand reports. Appendix C includes additional details on the identified ATMS needs and requirements. Through a competitive-bid process, Econolite's Centracs system was selected. Video Surveillance Per Figure 1, a number of key signalized intersections have been identified in the architecture for video surveillance via closed-circuit cameras; based upon known traffic issues and discussions with City staff. Video surveillance cameras should have pan, tilt and zoom (PTZ) functionality that can be controlled and accessed by multiple users. Image quality must match standard definition broadcast resolutions at a minimum. Video images will be linked to the back-office at the TMC and require a video software solution that addressed frame sync, converter, and processing, as well as managing access rights. Appendix C includes additional details on the needs and requirements for video surveillance PTZ cameras and central management software. Traffic Signal Preemption / Priority The proposed controller hardware/firmware must support a robust traffic signal preemption and priority functionality for emergency vehicles, railroad, and transit vehicles. The priority request generator and request servers shall support GPS communication and functionality, as the preferred detection mode to eliminate line of sight issues and provide additional time prior to priority vehicle arrival at the traffic signal. Note equipment that supports both infrared and GPS detection (multimode) is acceptable. Equipment is preferred which adheres to NTCIP protocols. Traffic signal preemption is desired at all intersections, although minor approaches that are not along expected emergency response routes may not be necessary. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 21 MISCELLANEOUS ITS TREATMENTS Other strategic ITS treatments that City staff and KAI identified as beneficial to include in this Citywide Master Plan, many of which are captured in Figure 2.These include: • Flashing yellow arrow signal heads to reduce delay and/or reduce crashes. • Central traffic signal and ITS system management software to interface with signal controller software seamlessly and allow for remote monitoring, timing changes, communication status, alarms, video monitoring, and performance monitoring in an enterprise (multi-user access fashion) • Preemption/priority central management system to remotely track, log and monitor preemption and priority requests from centralized location. • Countdown pedestrian signal heads, where appropriate. • ADA pedestrian treatments, such as accessible pedestrian push-buttons and addition of ADA compliant ramps and sidewalk, as appropriate. • Establish reliable traffic signal detection capable of withstanding Pasco weather conditions and rated to last at least 10 years. • Install battery back-up systems for strategic locations to provide a minimum of 2 hours of full-color signal operations in case of power interruption/loss and fit within a NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet. • Procure or install travel time, speed and origin-destination data system to provide real- time feedback on system operations. Because ITS and signals technology changes so quickly, it is recommended that these project components will be specified on a project by project basis and included in the plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) design package. SUMMARY This concept architecture defines the basic system components for an Ethernet-based, modernized traffic signal and high-capacity communications system to achieve the City defined needs and desires to efficiency move goods and people. We have defined a high-level network architecture for the City of Pasco, shown in Figure 1. A high-capacity communications approach to connecting all traffic signals is proposed, making use of largely leased PUD fiber-optic cable connections between City Hall, engineering and local traffic signal controllers and field ITS equipment. A few linkages have yet to be defined between a minority of intersections to connect to PUD leased fiber. This bridge could be accomplished through wireless radio/antenna, City-owned fiber or most likely, an extension of PUD fiber network. Table 5 below matches Table 1 and is shown again as it summarizes the system components and recommended specification that is outlined in this document. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 22 Table 5 City of Pasco Signal System Components System Component Recommended Specification Signal Cabinet NEMA TS2 Type 1 (Optional is battery back-up system) Signal Controller(New/Retrofit) 2070EN(adhering to CALTRANS specification for 2070E controllers, 2N field 1/0 module for T52 Type 1 cabinet) Local Signal Controller Firmware Econolite ASC/3 or Cobalt Controller Firmware Traffic Signal Central System Econolite Centracs Communication Standard Ethernet/IP Trunk Communication to TMC Fiber Optic(Leased or City-owned) Communication between Intersections . Fiber-Optic Cable(Leased or City-owned) • Primary . Point-to-Point/Point to Multipoint Wireless Spread • Secondary Spectrum 2.4-5.8 GHz Surveillance Cameras Pan-Tilt-Zoom(PTZ),Ethernet IP Based Traffic Management Center Communications City Managed Network IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS The high-level specifications can be expanded to support City contracting needs and to ensure consistency in design, procurement and construction of the City of Pasco traffic signal and communications system (ATMS). Ethernet-enabled cabinet and controller components are recommended as a first step, which enabled the Ethernet based communications via fiber connections into the City IS managed network, including back-office components of servers, switches, etc. Once traffic signal communication and interconnect is established, then traffic signal coordination and other event-based timing strategies can be developed to reduce user delay and stops. The next logical step is the addition of PTZ cameras for video surveillance and the management of those images with City partners (e.g. police and fire). The next step in the traffic signal system implementation would be outfitting traffic signals for emergency vehicle preemption and transit signal priority, using infrared or GPS-based equipment. The following lists in prioritized order based on discussions with City staff for the implementation of advanced signal system and communications (ITS) equipment/treatments: 1. Update Cabinets & Controllers: Consistent, Ethernet-capable signal cabinets (NEMA TS2 Type 1), network switches and type 2070EN traffic signal controllers 2. Consistent signal controller software: capable of supporting advanced features such as smart preemption, priority, dynamic flashing yellow arrow controls, performance logging, and an internal logic processor, as well as interfacing with desired City signal central software program. 3. Communication for traffic signal system along the corridor for interconnect and a fiber pathway (leased drop or City-owned) back to City engineering traffic management center (TMC) for central control and monitoring. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon Citywide Pasco Signal and Communication System Master Plan Project#:12839 March 3,2014 Page 23 4. Establish traffic signal preemption and traffic signal coordination, as appropriate. 5. Pan Tilt Zoom video surveillance cameras and backend equipment at TMC to manage, control and display images. 6. Flashing yellow arrow signal heads to reduce delay and/or reduce crashes. 7. Central traffic signal and ITS system management software to interface with signal controller software seamlessly and allow for remote monitoring, timing changes, communication status, alarms, video monitoring, and performance monitoring in an enterprise (multi-user access fashion) 8. Preemption/priority central management system to remotely track, log and monitor preemption and priority requests from centralized location. 9. Countdown pedestrian signal heads, where appropriate. 10. ADA pedestrian treatments, such as accessible pedestrian push-buttons and addition of ADA compliant ramps and sidewalk, as appropriate. 11. Establish reliable traffic signal detection capable of withstanding Pasco weather conditions and rated to last at least 10 years. 12. Install battery back-up systems for strategic locations to provide a minimum of 2 hours of full-color signal operations in case of power interruption/loss and fit within a NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet. 13. Procure or install travel time, speed and origin-destination data system to provide real- time feedback on system operations. It should be noted that this high-level architecture provides a road map to the end goal of implementing the modernized traffic signal and communications system, but elements may need to be modified to reflect specific corridor needs, and lessons learned with the early proof of concept testing, in particular with the communications system. Kittelson&Associates,Inc. Portland,Oregon APPENDIX A - CITY OF PASCO SIGNAL SYSTEM INVENTORY APPENDIX B - CITY OF PASCO WIRELESS NETWORK & PUD FIBER NETWORK APPENDIX C - CITY OF PASCO ATMS NEEDS & MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS APPENDIX A - CITY OF PASCO SIGNAL SYSTEM INVENTORY MONTHLY TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSPECTION EQUIPMENT UPDATE STATUS INSTALLATION INSPECTOR INSPECTION Loop Load Standard Veh 5-Head Pad Need to INTERSECTION NAME YEAR INITIALS DATE Controller Conflict monitor Cabinet detector switches Poles heads Veh heads heads update Priority 1.COURT&4th 1970 TMP-390 EDI SSM-12-1- NEMA(new)TS-1 11 Total 12 Total 3 Type III&1 Type II 11 0 8 2.COURT&5th 1981 TMP-390 SSD Guardian LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 6 Total 8 Total 3 Type III&1 Type II 8 0 8 3.COURT&10th 2010 M1 EDI Smart Monitor MMU NEMA TS-2 Type 1 9 Total 6 Total 2 Type II&1 Type III 5 1 4 4.COURT&14th 1979 TMP-390 EDI SSM-I2-LE NEMA(new)TS-1 10 Total 12 Total 3 Type III&1 Type II 12 0 8 5.COURT&20th 2004 Remodel TMP-390 IDC LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 10 Total 12 Total 3 Type III&1 Type II 8 2 8 6.COURT&22nd 1991 TMP-390 EDI SSM-I2-LE NEMA(new)TS-1 2 Total 8 Total 2 Type III&2 Type II 8 0 8 7.COURT&26th 1996 TMP-390 I EDI NSM-12L I NEMA(new)TS-1 114 Total 12 Total 13 Type III&1 Type II 8 2 8 8.COURT&ROAD 32/AUTOPLEX WAY* 2003 TMP-390 SSD Guardian LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 16 Total 11 Total 8 1 2 8 9.COURT&ROAD 34 1985 TMP-390 EDI SSM-12-L NEMA(new)TS-1 9 Total 11 Total 2 Type III&2 Type II 8 0 8 10.COURT&ROAD 36 1985 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 10 Total 112 Total 2 Type III&2 Type II 12 0 8 11.COURT&ROAD 40 1978 TMP-390 EDI 12-LE NEMA(old)TS-1 2 Total 14 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 12.SYLVESTER&4th 1978 TMP-390 SSD Guardian LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 6 Total 9 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 13.SYLVESTER&5th 1978 TMP-390 SSD Guardian LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 6 Total 8 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 14.SYLVESTER&10th 1984 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 5 Total 9 Total 1 Type III&2 type II 9 0 8 15.SYLVESTER&14th 1984 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 4 Total 8 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 16.SYLVESTER&20th 1970 TMP-390 EDI SSM-I2-LE NEMA(new)TS-1 12 Total 12 Total 4 Type III 9 0 8 17.SYLVESTER&28th 1975 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 8 Total(ne 4 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 18.CLARK&4th 1978 TMP-390 SSD Guardian LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 2 Total 4 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 19.CLARK&10th 1984 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 12 Total 12 Total 14 Type III 12 0 S 20.LEWIS&WEHE 1998 TMP-390 Honeywell TOM 2000 NEMA(old)TS-1 5 Total 4 Total 4 Type II 8 0 8 21.LEWIS&OREGON 973/1993 Remodel TMP-390 EDI SSM-I2-LE NEMA(new)TS-1 12 Total(ne 12 Total 4 Type III 12 0 8 22.LEWIS&3rd 1978 TMP-390 SSD Guardian LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 2 Total 4 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 23.LEWIS&4th 1978 TMP-390 SSD NP-61- NEMA(new)TS-1 2 Total 8 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 24.LEWIS&5th 1978 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 2 Total 7 total 4 Type III 8 0 8 25.LEWIS&7th 1969 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 2 Total 6 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 26.LEWIS&10th 1984 TMP-390 EDI SSM-12-L NEMA(new)TS-1 12 Total 12 Total 4 Type III 12 0 8 27.LEWIS&20th 1979 TMP-390 Honeywell TCM 2000 NEMA(old)TS-1 10 Total 12 Total 4 Type III 12 0 8 28.LEWIS&28th 2004 Remodel ITMP-390 I IDC LCD-12P I NEMA(new)TS-1 13 Total 15 Total 14 Type III 1 10 1 0 1 8 29."A"&OREGON 1985 TMP-390 EDI SSM-12-L NEMA(new)TS-1 10 Total 10 Total 2 Type III&2 Type II 12 0 8 30."A°&4th 1988 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 8 Total 8 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 31."A!'&10th 1984 TMP-390 EDI NSM-12L NEMA(new)TS-1 12 Total 12 Total 4 Type III 12 0 8 32.AINSWORTH&10th 1974 TMP-390 EDI SSM-I2-LE NEMA(new)TS-1 8 Total(ne 8 Total 2 Type III&2 Type II 10 0 8 33.HENERY&20th 1991 TMP-390 EDI SSM-I2-LE NEMA(new)TS-1 2 Total 5 Total 4 Type III 8 0 8 34.SUN WILLOWS&20th 1996 TMP-390 EDI SSM-I2-LE NEMA(new)TS-1 5 Total 9 Total 3 Type III&1 Type II 10 0 8 35.ARGENT&20th 2005 TMP-390 IDC LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 16 Total 13 Total 4 4 8 36.PEARL&20th 2005 TMP-390 I IDC LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 116 Total 113 Total 1 6 2 1 8 37.SANDIFUR&ROAD 68 2004 TMP-390 IDC LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 16 Total 13 Total 7 5 8 38.BURDEN&CONVENTION DR 2004 TMP-390 IDC LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 16 Total 113 Total 8 2 8 39.ARGENT&ROAD 68 2004 TMP-390 IDC LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 Camera Detection 5 4 8 40.BURDEN&ROAD 68 1997 M1 EDI Smart Monitor MMU NEMA TS-2 Type 1 12 Total(nel 12 Total 4 Type III 7 3 8 41.ROAD 68&CHAPEL HILL 2004 TMP-390 EDI Smart Monitor MMU NEMA(new)TS-1 16 Total 13 Total 11 0 2 42.BROADMOOR BLVD&CHAPEL HILL 2006 TMP-390 SSD Guardian LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 16 Total 13 Total 4 4 4 43.BROADMOOR BLVD AND SANDIFUR 1 2009 M1 EDI Smart Monitor MMU NEMA TS-2 Type 1 20 Total 10 Total 4 Type III 5 1 8 44.ROAD 68&WRIGLEY DR 2006 TMP-390 SSD Guardian LCD-12P NEMA(new)TS-1 16 Total 10 Total 14 Type III 4 5 8 45.ARGENT RD AND ROAD 80 2009 M1 EDI Smart Monitor MMU NEMA TS-2 Type 1 20 Total 10 Total 14 Type III 6 2 8 46.ARGENT RD AND ROAD 84 2009 M EDI Smart Monitor MMU NEMA TS-2 Type 1 20 Total 112 Total 14 Type 111 1 5 3 8 MONTHLY TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSPECTION EQUIPMENT UPDATE STATUS WSDOT INTERSECTION NAME INSTALLAT YEAR ION Controller Firmware Cabinet Communication Notes 1.Interstate l82 EB&Road 100(Broadmoor) 2070 Voyage 332 EnCom wireless 2.Interstate 182 WB&Road 100(Broadmoor) 2070 Voyage 332 EnCom wireless 3.Interstate 182 EB&Road 68 2070 Voyage 332 EnCom wireless 4.Interstate 182 WB&Road 68 2070 Voyage 332 EnCom wireless 5.Interstate 182 WB&Argent Road 2070 Voyage 332 dial up phone connection 6.Interstate 182 WB&20th Ave 170 Wapiti 332 none or dial up 7.Interstate 182 EB&20th Ave 170 Wapiti 332 none or dial up 8.Interstate 182 WB&4th Ave 170 Wapiti 332 none or dial up 9.Interstate 182 EB&4th Ave. 170 Wapiti 332 none or dial up 10.US 395 SB&Court St 170 Wapiti 332 none 11.US 395 NB&Court S[ I 170 Wapiti 332 none 12.SR 397(Oregon Ave)&Lewis St(SEE#2I on City summary) TMP 390 TMP 390 NEMA(new)TS-1 none City operates and maintains;WSDOT has no remote connection 13.SR 397(Oregon Ave)&A Street(SEE#29 on City summary) TMP 390 TMP 390 NEMA(new)TS-1 none City operates and maintains;WSDOT has no remote connection 14.SR 397(Ainsworth)&10th Avenue(SEE#32 on City summary) TMP 390 TMP 390 NEMA(new)TS-1 none City operates and maintains;WSDOT has no remote connection WSDOT South Central has no current central signal system in use APPENDIX B - CITY OF PASCO WIRELESS NETWORK & PUD FIBER NETWORK CITY OF PASCO StCNALtZED tNTERSECTtONS & TRAFFIC COMMUNtCATtONS NETWORK s .. s AJN AY AY HARRIS RD CHAPEL HILL BLVD - . T i 8T BLVD d E.S \ 8 a O 3 ARGENT RH ENT RD;i ° ARGENT RD s Rpr�� O $ �•. w CGLUI®IA �IE CG1DlDRITT us i. RD NNN V� RIVER n d YAKI -- COURT - — CD \_�`� eon SYLVESTER sT ^� L 1 ST SYL T m 'A'n 1 Bf Y ---- _ __ \ • =CITY FIBER CONNECTIONS POINTS -- =PRIVATE FIBER EDELMAN RD - / 3 z�z � °° .: DR I IlPd- TU SKAGR D DR ERNS IO / Ic�i CT CT 1 .7a I T Ficy ! CT, x ° D W BUCKIN R w TON ' OVERLAN OVER FLQp$OPL —� � �•_ _______________1 MIA UN 4 V NZO DR °I CzR CT CT I A-0 F{FE NIVERS DR _ 1 � 1 \`\ O I MAIESM E SLUQE@9KELQR °w ONgY 0 THREE F7VFR5 OR DAMON z T 1 O VINCENZO OR °I PACKARD DR as0 ■ °1 1 `\ ALPINE I LAKES _ 0 JR ZD �I S � I � i EDSEEI~ FS' REEK D v-I Y DR , , �HLRAZ QRu � O I I DR _OESOTO DR OR" WHITE __3 aaaaa a U C , �, ����������� 'lraaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ENZWJ FALLS DR , SANDIFUR PARKW i it' SANAIFUR P AR AY WEN4TCHEE DESCHUTES DR DIFU ARKWAY z, ROBINSON RO&NSON DR=' ORIOLE DR JEFFERS01 _ 1 T � WEM LEY z i B QTp T R��EDONDA OR VENDOVI DR COMISKEY DR 1 3 0 t5 Z I�gYy� PENDER DR ° ' 'o J I GEHRIG DR_ I I .� DGF_CT � cwi °a 1` 1 LAREDO DR o \¢ 1 3 ° SAVPRY DR _ F �P L -----�x L \ a x Y R ; I II POLK CT�4/ y I 3 PAMPLONA DR `TWICKCENSING - I ZAYAS DR ' _ o ,\ All Gl1EENSB' CAMANO DR ' DR - -��--- - DR'3-3 - _ - 1� ii_ d' MQlIIE6EY-6__ 3� ,TYLER BILBAO DO— c- _-- ARTESIA DR__ HMROW P�_ Y 'TSINO DR wl S O 1 d' 3P ,\ ■ r} CT 'DR ��h`�°n=RNA DR' 3 _ o J; ` p qP �' LUCENA OR SEGOVIA DR_ O LQ S O KINGSBU Y DR �+ LOPEZ I R ; L -- z o FlLLMORE DR. �� y z - --- a o EBBE75 DR 1 DR / __ -VALENCIA DR. _ ,\ 3 'LOPE I ---- FENWAY Eft m crsr I z -�9LAS+APS MIRGUA�gg wnGUA[N2 _T xf� Ts 1 aaaaaaa aaaaai-a-a�� J� SP,EDEN DR I loi oft D 5 '�i' v�U �l aa-aaaa--aaa- as--- -1 HARRIS RD - 0,4 OR CHAPEL HILL BLVD GuADRA I y / MUSTMIG DR I\ I , OR I v H C v`s lU PN M uflE \rr E DR ooq O' w l 0 1 1 5 oR I J oR 1 DR 1 1 q,R 'ZB I RODEO DR wSPBOdGF1d� m �'' 3ryOReCry �' CjF�'/ s �P RfiN R�QN DR _ PERCHERON DR 1 OR O PJ`G\/�fq�,� )RI DRP s ' °I g �U PALO S rcl ~ 1\ •♦ F O SHETU_ND ORI Gy 1 _ alz: _�_ R VERDE CT o Y2USA� R 1 !�, L ♦.w `°�\�CT /' LL'i W R q `F!y \ V\ BATON' E ORNE I = •.w, O, �_.� lbo R SHIRE DR z McLTESE DR 'Y,SO�\q\ I J DR I HILLTOP DR �°,, - QR-_ ooI w--w-- ---.ww-� 'JNE CpR000r D DR V' I\ I I RIVE ' I I I �, la _DE ERT PL—_ o° \ WVRI 55 ` ST 1 sr 3 �- A I I I s s� KARTCH R 1 • cam^ • ° I SONORA PLATEAU DR I I 1 i A /�JGy I ■ 1 o-r y� ,' \s OR/!Z' ■�` _ O \ I ON z� DR v�q N 0�0 p� EIS Q 1 3 ■ •-� ' ¢I 1 �_ 4 OJAVE DR¢~ c1c�i i i 6BSERT DR co �'� �oP° ■■ ■ I s�o2��T '•OR�2I - d ulu I M ° °� cr w 1 ♦,' �,°,R � ■ ■ ■� `1t( _ _ .• � _ �� O ��`_ ' HILL 3 �~J? h� R, i, VPa SS` ,\ � � ,,�♦ a nEUN cr of ao R� I \\ Tpygq u�ti> EADOW vI $ oR �O pT p� 1 4°� ■ �I HAPEL HILL BLVD iy ■ MAPLE OR' MAPLE DR I = DEL MAR CT ♦♦ qP qi- O ■ RED ROAN CT. __ I w - ♦' c�9R' ■LLMWOOD_ _- j�------ I ■■. ■ o�3 = d' O \ 1\'3� "/" 'Y \ I 1 ■ I _ \ �OT DR colsr CT I VALLEY w PL m IN 8 (,r� Py 1 ■ � 0 1 I '♦ ° ■ TUSCANY IS BELL Sr I R I iiYl Yil�,. ARGENT RD [N2 1 --_ ■ Z I • Mw•* i--- \ ARGENT PL 1\ HELENS St i ARGENT RD ARGENT RD ■ ■ ARGENT RD AR AVE_ _—_ ♦♦ � STAR LN ' s' ■ �' +... �..�w �� � � I i R(TEN�\ ♦♦♦ I I &I Co I ■ �I ■ 00 ■ ■ $I 7'""DR _ I DRPDIE RD_�_ W.DRADIE AVE_ A dl ■ /CC�.j`5.,. ' 1 ,/� ♦♦ 1 DRAOIE ST I _DRADIE RD _ ' •...+ f0 �.1 ' ' O d' A �r3v.., , -__' g L`i ' ♦; POOLEIt R' D I a �I ^iI $I i I i a' ��e Ate, W.DOUCVILLE RD ♦ O m I HI I �- I W.LMNGSTON RD ----_— W.LIVINGSTON RD --_-- -- '\ COLUMBIA BAS, £ PRES CK 01 PIR DR NGSTON I �I -- oI El COMMUNITY COL GE ♦ I FRANKLIN RD FRAM RD I I oI o, ' SUN W,LLI.WS BLVD W z S 1' �_—_—_� �.BAtlKU ' I �I o RICHARDSON I OE"' ER c A Ao UIRFI I-" 1 ♦ • RICHARDSON RD ' ON RD,, RICHARDSON1RRD ♦♦ \ Gyp '— I I ----- VI LMELVI•-RD I QI BELLERNE o f WAY 1 CRT♦♦ \J\� Rci• •■• •�. ----�-- I WERNETT RD I� US-39 JAMES ST ♦ \� _ WERNETT RD —L --� (� ♦ w w w w w w ° JAY ST - DR ��II JAY ST 1 �� ERw�I '• I _�" ■ ° I ■ _ JAY ST , SFABR 'CT JAY -�)•� 61 �- I O 1 M WHIPPLE AVE • ° PLE_AVE• �" I ■ BUTTERN CIRCLE{' I \\lI ;♦ - - �& WHIP /' W _ WP SIT - -_ I—'W.ELA SI I--_J-m �ST_ WADE CW EL ST ' R _ J tJ T JAN ST ♦♦ �' °i SIL REST CT'IO cI I I BUMPAOUS RD P—I ^'N n QX�� _�I -- LEOIA ST RI SON 6 I_ �A T ■ OUN OR �1 I LEOU ST -- Emmons... ' - — -♦ ---�.••■ti I ■ ROSE EEK CT' _ _ —_ � P PEPRL ST PEARL ST♦ ..,., . k ■ W. PEARL • ,---'-- W.PEARL SLW. I W.PEA AI�1 RI�ER -Y ,,♦♦ `'� RA ST �•�-....T�' ... ■...� � ST+—_ �I OPAL ST ° G Qc � E '�2ALSLyc ' d' ♦ R R-RAY Ct °z' 9' GRACE W_OPPL 5T AGATE ST _' d' _ _' / , _ HIGHLAND�T O i _._I AGATE ST 3`rI A ... .AGA _ -- -� I 7-, r - '� ° F 1-1 �' 1 ♦ ZI C W.AGATE a \ ,� z \ °AGATE ST I �/� .♦' \�.� Co SpN �?r �J I Q' I I I �" ■d1 W. BY ST I RU RUBY I I I RU _- Y � t I J I I � I I i o 1 Ad \N � COURTS 'A I< W.RUBY COU ST OU T T = 44-­ TAR CT I� `OI ' ■ ■ ■ W_•BROWN STx BROWNm F O iMELL —_� Ca1T�IME '�7 ,\ �.CZ / I I II , i I I ARBUNS 1 1 ♦ aR/ &' �F_fiJ`� a L'V of ■ QI BROWN ST I ■ I�,,^D A W.MARIE ST 3 I wI ,_�-BEQYSLSL _ I L O� --.• r�` 'RO l BID --- ♦ BY� I // ga NJe I■ & MARIE ST ' p `�-�' I W +MARIE ST W.�RlE li° 6 -- zI 'i '�' I---�'g�'` 4k lb ♦♦♦ \( E� c 'Pv W.MARIE ST R MARIE ST I ■ ST & ^ �a -- I MARIE ST I� _ 1\ ,\, ``ice Y" K CT I■ I,STONE RT �� T_ W. TAA ST j-- OCTT W_OCTAVE ST W OCT Sl—_ , "" - 'OCTAVE ST_IT I \ ' u'',' x sl `�_H_JF ♦ P7 ODI CT OCTAVE ST I■ �1 90,1 VE,I _ W.HENRY ST QI I I HENRY ST _ ENRY ST _ HENH'L '� �-W SPRUCE ST ♦♦ `�`�,� , IW.OCTAVE T zJ . Il' 1 "'I I _— —_�` _ W.HENRY$T _— —_—L -� - - 1\ \ A ♦ #LYE � � ■...� I� `ENRY ST `r Imo.... HENRY PL I ay � I� �w� ,�♦' `�"'^.,,,� 17'LpN - OLIVl4 CTS.. "�I BUENA T �' �I 1 - I _— I H MARGARET _- -_�MARGAREP ST i _ ° \ W GEO E ' a' ' iVRE CT I E GEORGE ST �+ J W.M GARET_ST W`-MMGARET 5T C� f-- l ■ W MAR ST _J I I p w i T W.MARGARET STS I �♦ 'r � W.HENRYS Io G ST w w ♦ 4 ■ ,II W.PAR ST PARK ST a _ I w o PLVINA ST ♦w �O PARK ST m' I ■ K S� '' _ P. T_—_ �I ^I �� Q' PARK ST a '�� ' 3I $I �- 6 ♦•., - -Jrc I _- I i+ - QI d �I a NnIi `~'1 T _ \ 1 ` EALVINA ST. ♦ +_" , I A �� �I °s 1W I E NIXON ST J( 05N F'� ALV NA� o + ,• ♦ti L `_,NIXON STS & 3 _ WAX ST—_� "' I%N T I 1 —� I I SR •-- -�. SYLVESTER • I I1 � °� NIXON ST ' � NESTER'ST ' ' , ` "1�" , ` ' - EAST LLWIS PLACE '••.��, I ~t• SYLV STER ST SYLVEST__ w ST - I i LEWIS STW '---••ww w -- IRVING 5 + I �� 3I I 'iW.IRVING ST °aI W. `wI W.rf ST QI d •�, - -- RVING RD °a O IRVING ST QI QI ^I I I A _ ° I "Id cac�" S SH"C \ �` yL w' w ►` (4 0 9q°I qI, yy US ° a W , .,,. .,.�.,._. -- - w- --w••ww-----, ... oI R RIVERHA RD_RIVER HAVEN STa I 31 SHONE ST _ _ $L_ �I u'I xI W i c, T �-'`^� ••• I � ¢ S'T HCPKIN ST ^' ST �� ___ _ � I-1 ALTONTST r � N ♦w' �..._.-t��- �--�,„_ N W. NOPK N T y c o T •w '', `'�._._t"'^�.- -'-_._ VSTA�Si C'7 'T' ' I d ��.i,�al ROryrAC -�--r-�- s air I m 5V c^` O 31 I I cI HE ST PRIMA '- •. I I I I pILI,E S � F NEVILLE ST Z �L 1\ c yL x�_1-1—�IELENy J-1—L fx •.w _ _ FRp = c� \ T.UV!' \ 'A I �I I I.II ELL Ci — -•.www-- I ` QI � -�- C- _ '.�� I WI I aI BUTTE!I ST-1 I %I BUTTE CT CLENDI,� PAZ z CT — CIS'CO A CCESS POINTS -----••.... - °^ I�_i�l1i rII ; 1 I UI WI - I �I � GLENDII,V.,ES 91 ES7REL C�P �,�+♦yi 9 1 „AIL S e 8 3 3' "A„ ST Q �= I low = CITYFIBER CONNECTIONS POINTS W w _ a' a�qq] s' E.-B-S� I r1 N .- KI 1I x N ' UI =ESTEEM CITY NETWORK '''''''-w•••w O �'r = ESTEEM UN-INTERGRA TED RADIO CONTROL AINS�RT �° ---•------ WAN/NCTpV� ..._jI_ST � C�N ST\r = 4. 9 MHz RADIO PA THS •• �`\gip m �' `\ I - 2. 4 RA DIO PATHS - I = PRIVA TE FIBER - - - • ..... - -P UD FIBER EXISTAERIAL • '' • . \ y P UD FIBER EXIST (A"xOUND ' - C Y 0 D ASCO S G \ A Z D s c 0 w ss wo K 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 5000 •••,.�. I I I I I I I ••.� � SCALE BAR •� UPDATED: 07 30 2013 CITY AA PASCO StCNALtZED tNTERSECTtONS A COMMUNtCATtONS SYSTEM 9 a �tavFlf Si1NDa+UR P Y F G � m \_.. anRws an � cFIAPEE xtu.aE G c avROER eEw t c i KARS'C S7' R -� I O . 8 O S KIM � 9 9 O e 44 ARGENT * a COLUMBIA RA CO rry bg YYUNITY CO E YAKIMA RER IV aql OOL�� COURT iT _ � m R : n LEM N 9 — — — =CITY LIMITS - sn T N Nri,FSfER 1 =FLASHING BEACON =COP SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ' =STATE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION � =PROPOSED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - — - =FUTURE ROADWAY ` ` E) UPAI i Z._ CENTEIE R t� =FUTURE ROUNDABOUT Q =VIDEO (PTZ CAMERA) _ =EXISTING FIBER DROP* 0 =PROPOSED FIBER DROP* =PUD FIBER EXIST* =FUTURE COMMUNICATION CONNECTION* CITY OF (IF FIBER,INCLUDE NEW DROP NEAR SIGNAL CABINET) PA , =PERMANENT TRAVEL TIME, SPEED, Tx L i ORIGIN-DESTINATION SYSTEM(BLUETOOTH ) =BATTERYBACKUP SYSTEM * =ENHANCED TRAFFIC SIGNAL DETECTION \ *ALL COMMUNICATION LINKS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON SITE SCALE BAR UPDATED:0310312014 SURVEY, TESTING&VALIDATION. APPENDIX C - CITY OF PASCO ATMS NEEDS & MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS System Engineering for Pasco Signals Local&Central Software/Firmware System Local Signal Controller Firmware Needs Mandatory Requirements Optional Requirements Average response time to agency assist/technical requests of less than two business days; Have a user forum updated at least monthly; A minimum of 10 agencies currently operating local controller software; Software that will be supported and Meets current NEMA TS2,IEEE,and NTCIP standards last long into the future and is compatible with other ITS components Runs seamlessly on CalTrans specified 2070E controller hardware. Runs seamlessly on NEMA TS2 Type 1 cabinet hardware and system. One vendor shall provide local and central software.Local and central software shall operate under a single programming entity Runs seamlessly on ATC standard 5.2b or more recent hardware Supports a minimum of 8 traffic signal phases and 4 overlap phases and 4 pedestrian phases Supports a minimum of 10 coordination plans,scheduled,along with settings unique to each timing plan(e.g.varying max times,ped times,event timing plans/parameters) Includes a variable max time that adjusts based on demand Accomodates using multiple settings for traffic signal preemption(railroad Does truck signal priority(green extension based on approaching and emergency vehicle) truck) Flexibility in signal phasing and timing Accomodates with multiple standard settings for transit signal priority(early to address unique situations green and green extension) Supports extended walk functionality allowed within 2009 MUTCD Accomodates user-configurable preemption recovery settings,such as returningto phase with longest delay or queue. Accomodates FYA directly through built in software settings,including ability to turn on/off conditionally(statically or dynamically implemented).A Accomodates conditional FYA operation,such as not-ped and gap- minimum of time of day control of FYA is required. dependent settings. Has a logic processor with at least 20 lines,and or supportive of at least 50 unique functional settings,allowing for user-customizable solutions Accomodates active monitoring,alerts and logging for detector status,faults, Controller software version updates occur within 2 minutes on the etc.(NEMA T52 faults) 2070 hardware platform. Comprehensive signal performance Performance logging of key metrics: measures along with an intuitive Cycle,split,offset,phase order Performance logging of key metrics: architecture,making active Coordination status Phase termination type(max out,force off,or gap out) management easy Preemption/Priority Status Quality of progression(e.g.%arrivals on green/red) Traffic Volumes Frequency of pedestrian service intervals(distinguish extended walk) Controller software version updates can occur in mainline green dwell mode or flash mode(user-configurable). Central Signal Controller Software Needs Mandatory Requirements Optional Requirements Windows based program Modern graphical user interface with a map/aerial background import option; Easy to understand and use Live signal phasing and timing display,as well as at least the last cycle durations,phases services(vehicle,peds,bikes,transit) One vendor shall provide local and central software.Local and central software shall operate under a single programming entity Shall support NTCIP and TC/IP Ethernet standards Shall support traffic responsive and or adaptive signal controls. Shall provide database transfer(e.g.signal timing)and comparison capability Shall support signal preemption and priority logging,monitoring, between central control and field devices. and management. Shall utilize distributed control to support monitoring and control of multiple intersections. Shall support multiple users as an enterprise software Shall support at least once per second status polling Robust ITS and signal control Shall provide for video control and monitoring(PTZ,CCTV or video detection) Within a single point and click video images can be pulled up; functionality Shall support prioritized alarm events by threshold and types Shall support the ability to provide both pre-defined and customized reports Shall support user-defined access privileges Shall support VPN/internet access without interfering with central and local signal control and operations Shall provide time-space diagrams and other diagnostic graphics and tools to assist in infrastructure health and signal timing effectiveness. Shall provide a display and query functionality for performance logging metrics defined in local controller software(see above) Shall work within City managed IP-based network on HP hardware Shall work under a Windows 7 operating system in a server environment. Database software will be required to operate securely in a Microsoft SQL Server 2008112 or later,64 bit environment and may be required to operate In a shared SQL Server instance Works seamlessly with existing City Shall work within an"industry accepted"architecture,be expandable,an engineering and IS signal/ITS seamlessly function within an Ethernet Local Area Network Environment. equipment Shall work with ESTEEM wireless modems/spread-spectrum(5.8 GHz) communication system Shall work with Sony PTZ cameras Shall work with GTT Opticom preemption/priority equipment Shall work with Ruggedcom Ethernet switches Shall work with single mode fiber optics communication system IP-Based Closed Circuit Television Pan-Tilt-Zoom Camera Assembly Pan-tilt-zoom(PTZ)closed circuit television cameras shall be supplied as a unit including camera with integrated lens, id generator, camera controller,pressurized environmental enclosure,pan and tilt mechanism, tinted dome, rain/sun shade, and the camera system shall be Internet Protocol or IP-based. PTZ cameras shall meet the following minimum requirements: • Cameras shall be compatible with ATMS central traffic signal system via either direct integration or via a hyperlink • Climate controlled weatherproof dome(heater,fan if required by manufacture) • Day/Night operation • I color lux night capability • .1 b\w lux night capability • 28 x optical zoom • 360 degree endless rotation • 200 degree tilt • 720p HD resolution • 30 frames per second • H.264, JPEG, and MPEG compression • Video motion detection • Preset and Tour Mode capable • Audio Capable • ONVIF(Compatible with multiple vendors CCTV manager and recording systems) • DEPA Intelligent Video Analytics The PTZ CCTV cameras shall seamlessly and fully integrate operationally with the IP Camera Video Management and Recording Software already procured, but subject to confirmation from City engineering and IS staff. CITY AA PASCO StCNALtZED tNTERSECTtONS A COMMUNtCATtONS SYSTEM 9 a �tavFlf Si1NDa+UR P Y F G � m \_.. anRws an � cFIAPEE xtu.aE G c avROER eEw t c i KARS'C S7' R -� I O . 8 O S KIM � 9 9 O e 44 ARGENT * a COLUMBIA RA CO rry bg YYUNITY CO E YAKIMA RER IV aql OOL�� COURT iT _ � m R : n LEM N 9 — — — =CITY LIMITS - sn T N Nri,FSfER 1 =FLASHING BEACON =COP SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ' =STATE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION � =PROPOSED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION - — - =FUTURE ROADWAY ` ` E) UPAI i Z._ CENTEIE R t� =FUTURE ROUNDABOUT Q =VIDEO (PTZ CAMERA) _ =EXISTING FIBER DROP* 0 =PROPOSED FIBER DROP* =PUD FIBER EXIST* =FUTURE COMMUNICATION CONNECTION* CITY OF (IF FIBER,INCLUDE NEW DROP NEAR SIGNAL CABINET) PA , =PERMANENT TRAVEL TIME, SPEED, Tx L i ORIGIN-DESTINATION SYSTEM(BLUETOOTH ) =BATTERYBACKUP SYSTEM * =ENHANCED TRAFFIC SIGNAL DETECTION \ *ALL COMMUNICATION LINKS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON SITE SCALE BAR UPDATED:0310312014 SURVEY, TESTING&VALIDATION.