Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2012.07.09 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. July 9, 2012 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance. 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) Building Permit Intake Process Presentation. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA) Presented by Mitch Nickolds, Inspection Services Manager. (b) Zoning Code Amendment (MF# CA2012 -003): 1. Agenda Report from Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director dated July 3, 2012. 2. Planning Commission Report dated 6/21/12. 3. Planning Commission Recommendations. 4. Proposed Ordinance. 5. Letter from Goodwill Industries dated 6/22/12. 6. Letter from Property Owner dated 6/27/12. (c) Road 68 Corridor Study (Argent Road to Powerline Road): 1. Agenda Report from Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director dated July 3, 2012. 2. Resolution. 3. Alternative Analysis - Implementation Schedule. 4. Road 68 Corridor Study (Council packets only; copy available in Public Works office, Pasco Library and on the city's website at www.pasco- wa.gov /citvcouncilreports for public review). (d) Capital Improvement Plan: 1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated July 3, 2012. 2. Proposed Capital Improvement Plan 2013 -2018 (Council packets only; copy available for review in the City Manager's office, Pasco Library and on the city's website at www.pasco-wa.gov/citycouncilreports). (e) Rivershore Linkages and Amenities (MF# PLAN2012 -003): 1. Agenda Report from Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director dated July 3, 2012. 2. Draft Rivershore Linkages and Amenities Plan (Council packets only; copy available in Planning office, Pasco Library and on the city's website at www.pasco- wa.gov / citvcouncilreports for public review). (t) Meter Reading Contract: 1. Agenda Report from Dunyele Mason, Finance Manager dated June 29, 2012. 2. Memorandum to City Manager. 3. Contract for Meter Reading and Related Services and Exhibit A. (g) Park Code Infractions and Bail: 1. Agenda Report from Rick Terway, Administrative & Community Services Director dated July 5, 2012. 2. Proposed Ordinance. 3. Park Infractions. 5. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) (b) (c) 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (a) (b) (c) Workshop Meeting 2 July 9, 2012 7. ADJOURNMENT REMINDERS: 1. 12:00 p.m., Monday, July 9, Pasco Red Lion — Pasco Chamber of Commerce Membership Luncheon. (Franklin County Commissioner Primary Candidates Forum) 2. 6:00 p.m., Monday, July 9, Conference Room #1 — Old Fire Pension Board Meeting. ( COUNCILMEMBER REBECCA FRANCIK, Rep.; SAUL MARTINEZ, Alt.) 3. 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, July 10, Senior Center — Senior Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting. ( COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN, Rep.; BOB HOFFMANN, Alt.) 4. 2:00 p.m.; Tuesday, July 10, BF Health Department — Continuum of Care Task Force Meeting. ( COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY) 5. 7:00 a.m., Thursday, July 12, — BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee Meeting. ( COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.) 6. 7:00 p.m., Thursday, July 12, Transit Facility — Ben - Franklin Transit Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep.; COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Alt.) AGENDA REPORT FOR: City TO: Gary FROM: Rick White, Community & E onomic Development Director SUBJECT: Zoning Code Amendment (MF# CA2012 -003) 1. REFERENCE(S): 1. PC Report dated 6/21/2012 2. Planning Commission Recommendations 3. Proposed Ordinance 4. Letter from Goodwill Industries dated 6/22/12 5. Letter from property owner dated 6/27/12 II. III. IV. V, July 3, 2012 Workshop Mtg.: 7/9/12 ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 7/9: DISCUSSION FISCAL IMPACT: NONE HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. In February of this year City Council requested the Planning Commission review the current zoning regulations that restrict retail sales of secondhand goods to the "C -3" (General Business) and Industrial Zones. Council action was initiated by a request from Goodwill Industries to revise zoning regulations to permit sales of secondhand goods in the "C -1" Zoning District. B. Existing restrictions include prohibiting secondhand stores outright in "C -1" (Retail Business), "C -2" (Central Business), `BP" (Business Park), "O" (Office) and "CR" (Regional Commercial) Zones and limiting secondhand stores to "C -3" or Industrial Zones with a minimum 1,000 foot separation from other secondhand stores. C. The zoning restrictions are intended to minimize stores used as repositories for junk and unwanted items, reduce the "clustering" of secondhand stores with marginal economic operations or poor business practices and avoid a public perception detrimental to private investment in particular areas of the City. D. Following a public hearing on June 21, 2012 the Planning Commission recommended approval of an amendment to the zoning code that would allow consignment -type secondhand stores in the "C -1 ", "C -2 ", "C -3 ", and "I -1" Zones, and donation -based thrift shops in the "C -1" and "C -2" Zones with special permit approval. DISCUSSION: A. For consistent regulation, the proposed code amendment has defined and divided secondhand stores into three types, as follows: 1. CONSIGNMENT STORE. "Consignment store" means a retail establishment having up to but no more than 50% of its stock -in -trade in "secondhand personal property" as the term is defined in this chapter, offered for sale on behalf of others in return for a commission, typically a percentage of the sales price. 2. SECONDHAND DEALER. "Secondhand dealer" means an establishment having any portion of its stock -in -trade in "secondhand personal property" as that term is defined in this chapter, exclusive of consignment stores and thrift shops as defined in sections 25.12.157 and 25.12.456 of this chapter.. 3. THRIFT SHOP. "Thrift shop" means a retail establishment having any portion of its stock -in -trade in "secondhand personal property" as the term is defined in this chapter, which has been donated by the public, and at least 80% of its total floor space devoted to retail sales. 4(b) B. The proposed amendment maintains the 1,000 foot separation from other pawnshops, consignment stores, thrift stores or secondhand dealers. C. At the April 19, 2012 and May 17, 2012 meetings the Planning Commission discussed the parameters of allowing certain types of secondhand uses in the "C -I ", "C -2 ", "C -3" and 1-1 "Zones. The Planning Commission was in favor of retaining the prohibition of secondhand stores in the "CR ", "O" and `BP" Zoning Districts. D. In response to a request by a property owner's representative, the Commission again considered the inclusion of secondhand stores in the "CR" Zone at the June 21, 2012 public hearing. Discussion of the request and of the intended purpose of the "CR" Zone, led the Commission to retain the exclusion of secondhand stores from the "CR" Zone (as well as the "O" and `BP" Zones - see References 44 and #5) E. Staff requests Council discussion and direction on this issue. MEMORANDUM DATE: June 21, 2012 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey B. Adams SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT - SECONDHAND DEALERS IN C -1 and C -2 ZONES (MF# CA 2012 -003) This memo is in response to a request by Goodwill Industries to locate a secondhand (thrift) shop in a C -1 Zone, which is prohibited by current zoning code. The request is to explore the advisability of altering the code to allow secondhand stores in C -1 Zones, in terms of expected positive and negative outcomes for public health, safety, and welfare. In 1989 there were 10 secondhand stores located within two blocks of the City's Central Business District; Goodwill, the Salvation Army, St. Vincent de Paul, two pawnshops, four used TV shops and one used book store. Additionally, it was noted that the area between First Avenue and 14th Avenue of West Lewis Street contained a disproportionately high number of secondhand stores in comparison with other commercially zoned areas within the city. A survey of these businesses conducted in 1989 revealed that the majority of these establishments were maintained in such a haphazard manner as to create visual blight for the area in which they were located. The buildings in question also exhibited signs of physical decay and varying degrees of deferred maintenance, perpetuating a negative public image for the community and presumably discouraging business investment within these areas. On the 20th of February 1990 the City Council passed ordinance 2768 prohibiting secondhand dealers from operating in the C -1 (Retail Business), C- 2 (Central Business District), and C -1 -D (Designated Shopping Center) zones (C -1 -D Zone now eliminated from the zoning code), as well as restricting placement of these and similar uses in the C -3 (General Business District) and I -1 (Light Industrial) zones to no less than 1,000 feet from each other. The reasoning cited in the ordinance is as follows 1) The concentration of secondhand stores along with the manner in which they are maintained contributes to visual blight, physical decay, declining property values and perpetuates a negative public image for the community in general; 2) The external effects of physical decay and blight make the Central Business District and certain portions of Lewis Street less desirable for business investment: 3) Secondhand dealers, specifically pawnshops, require considerable regulation to protect the community and public interest by preventing said establishments from becoming facilities for the concealment of crime and outlets for stolen goods: 4) The enforcement of municipal codes relative to the operation of secondhand dealers is time consuming, burdensome, and costly to the community; The purpose of this project is to analyze the Goodwill Industries request in light of the above criteria and any other likely concerns related to secondhand businesses in general. It may be helpful to conceptually separate and define three categories of secondhand stores, as follows: 1) Pawnshops; 2) Consignment stores; and 3) Thrift Shop (Donation- based). Pawnshop: "A ... business that offers secured loans to people, with items of personal property used as collateral." (Wikipedia.org) Consignment store: "A retail store that sells secondhand items on behalf of others and receives a percentage of the sales price." (Dictionary.com) Thrift Shop: "[Thrift] shops are a type of social enterprise ... [which] usually sells mainly used goods donated by members of the public . . . ." (Wikipedia.org) Title 18 of the City of Kennewick Municipal Code and Section 23.06 of the Richland Municipal both define pawn shops as follows: "Pawn shop" means an establishment engaged in the buying or selling of new or secondhand merchandise and offering loans in exchange for personal property. Kennewick treats pawn and secondhand uses identically, requiring each to report to the police daily on all transactions. Excluded are stores which deal exclusively with "postage stamps, coins that are legal tender, bullion in the form of fabricated hallmarked bars, used books, and clothing of a resale value of $75.00 or less, except furs." These items lie outside the definition of "Secondhand Property." Title 18 of the City of Kennewick Municipal Code defines secondhand/ consignment shops as follows: 18.09.1915: Second- Hand /Consignment Store: "Second Hand/ Consignment Store" means retail business which sells merchandise on a consignment basis or outright. While consignment is addressed, no mention is made of goods being used, thus virtually any retail outlet in the city could qualify as a secondhand/ consignment store. Section 23.06 of the Richland Municipal Code defines secondhand shops differently, as follows: 23.06.835 Secondhand/ consignment store. "Secondhand/ consignment store" means an establishment engaged in the retail sale of used clothing, sports equipment, appliances, and other merchandise. [Ord. 28 -05 § 1.021. Richland's code seeks to encompass the look and feel of a typical thrift shop, but excludes the "consignment" feature from their definition. Neither Kennewick nor Richland Code makes a distinction whether items sold are purchased or donated. It should be noted that donation - dependent thrift shops such as Goodwill Industries differ substantially from pawnshops and consignment -type secondhand stores in that there is no built -in incentive for patrons "fencing" stolen goods for cash, and thereby contributing to overall criminal activity in the community. As such, criminal -based policing would not likely be an issue, so much as nuisance -based code enforcement. This said, we need to evaluate this particular business model in light of the above criteria. First, do all secondhand stores contribute to visual blight, physical decay, declining property values and perpetuate a negative public image for the community in general? As Goodwill is a donation- dependent operation, people drop items off as a matter of course; these items ranging in value from "slightly used" to "junk." While secondhand stores often strive to control the flow of castoffs, "midnight drop -offs" are virtually inevitable, and result in visual blight. As well, revenues for secondhand businesses may not be adequate to fund periodic upgrades or repairs to facilities, resulting in physical decay. These two factors will likely contribute to a decline in the physical value of the subject property, and in turn pull down the value of surrounding properties. A critical mass of these factors will project a negative public image of local citizens not caring about their community. As an example, the long -term effects of these forces on the downtown area, the external effects of physical decay and blight, have in fact driven business investors out of the area, left many buildings vacant, and made the Central Business District (CBD) and certain portions of Lewis Street less desirable for business investment. This is what happened in the 1980s. With the eventual removal of secondhand stores from the CBD there has been some growth in business activity including major investments such as Rite -Aid and Fiesta Foods, as well as many smaller businesses, and vacancy rates have decreased overall. While pawnshops require considerable regulation to protect the community and public interest by preventing them from becoming facilities for the concealment of crime and outlets for stolen goods, consignment -based secondhand dealers have traditionally seen minimal levels of stolen goods. Donation- dependent facilities rarely have that problem, since goods are donated, not exchanged for profit. This virtually eliminates the incentive and thus the likelihood of criminal "fencing" of goods by store patrons. However the issues of building decay, visual blight, and negative public image remain, and enforcement of municipal codes relative to the operation of secondhand dealers is still going to be time consuming, burdensome, and costly to the community; the special conditions which would be required of a donation - dependent secondhand store could be burdensome to enforce. Finally, the applicant has suggested that in order to allow second hand stores and simultaneously maintain property in a way that supports the objectives of the City, square footage requirement of 18,000 to 20,000 square feet may be a consideration, as large scale operations generally have the resources and labor necessary to maintain the visual appearance and general upkeep of a facility. However, welcoming large -scale enterprises at the expense of smaller ones may have negative legal implications. If the objective is to maintain the visual aspects of a site, design and maintenance requirements can be imposed regardless of the scale of an enterprise; the business owner then deciding if their business model "pencils out" when incorporating required mitigation measures. Otherwise such a minimum square footage requirement might need to be applied to all businesses in a zone equally. In summary, while increased criminal activity is likely not a factor when dealing with donation -based secondhand stores, visual blight, physical decay, declining property values, and probable increased costs for code enforcement are issues for consideration. Findings of Fact 1) Ordinance 2768 was enacted on February 20, 1990 to combat degradation in the downtown areas of Pasco. 2) The C -1 and CBD Zoning Districts were experiencing blight, vacancy, and loss of property value at the time. 3) Vacancy rates in the Pasco CBD have decreased overall since the enactment of ordinance 2768. 4) Goodwill Industries has submitted a request for a code amendment to allow secondhand stores in C -1 Zones. 5) The Planning Commission considered the request at workshop meetings on April 19 and May 17, 2012. Recommendation MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact as contained in the June 21, 2012 staff memo on Secondhand Dealers in C -1 and C -2 Zones. MOTION: I move the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the proposed Code Amendment regulating the location and operation of secondhand stores within the City. Planning Commission Recommendations CA 2012 -003 *1,000' separation from other consignment stores, thrift shops, pawn shops and secondhand dealers required. CA 2012 -003 Use Matrix - Secondhand Stores Pawn Shops & Consignment Donation -Based Secondhand Zone Stores Thrift Sho Dealers Allowed Special Permit C -1 Outright* Required * Prohibited Allowed Special Permit C -2 Outright* Required * Prohibited Allowed Allowed C -3 Outright* Outright* Allowed Outright* Allowed Allowed I -1 Outright* Outright* Allowed Outright* *1,000' separation from other consignment stores, thrift shops, pawn shops and secondhand dealers required. CA 2012 -003 Use Matrix - Secondhand Stores ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING PMC TITLE 25 DEALING WITH SECONDHAND STORES IN C -I AND CBD ZONING DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, cities have the responsibility to regulate and control the physical development within their borders and ensure that the public health, safety and welfare are maintained; and, WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has zoning regulations that encourage orderly growth and development of the city, and WHEREAS, in the past, Pasco had accommodated many secondhand stores that were concentrated geographically in the Central Business District; and WHEREAS, the concentration of secondhand stores along with the manner in which they were maintained contributed to visual blight, physical decay, declining property values and perpetuated a negative public image for the community in general and the Central Business District; and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to guide the location of such consignment stores and thrift shops, and WHEREAS, the purpose of the "C -1 ", "C -2" and "C -3" Zoning Districts include the promotion of commercial activities that are intended to serve the community and the Pasco Urban Area and provide the location for diverse business types, and WHEREAS, the "O" (Office) Zoning District is intended to provide the location for the development and operation of professional and administrative offices, and WHEREAS, the `BP" (Business Park) Zoning District is intended to provide the location for the development of business parks in a campus like setting that includes professional offices and high technology manufacturing, and WHEREAS, the "CR" (Commercial Regional) Zoning District is intended to provide a location for commerce that serves an entire region, and WHEREAS, secondhand stores may be able to operate in such a way as to minimize the possible effects of physical decay and blight, given specific mitigating measures; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered and recommended amending Title 25 by defining the various types of secondhand stores, permitting their operation in "C -1 ", "C -2" and "C -3" Zoning Districts and retaining existing restrictions on operations in the "O ", "BP" and "CR" Zoning Districts, and Page I of 3 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations, and has determined that to further the purpose of comprehensive planning and to maintain and protect the welfare of the community, it is necessary to amend PMC Title 25, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That a new PMC Section 25.12.157 hereby is enacted to read as follows: 25 12 157 CONSIGNMENT STORE. "Consignment store" means a retail establishment having up to but no more than 50% of its stock -in -trade in "secondhand personal property" as the term is defined in this chanter, offered for sale on behalf of others in return for a commission typically a percentage of the sales price. Section 2. That Section 25.12.385 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 25.12.385 SECONDHAND DEALER. "Secondhand dealer" means an establishment having any portion of its stock -in -trade in "secondhand personal property" as that term is defined in this chapter, exclusive of consignment stores and thrift shops as defined in sections 25.12.157 and 25.12.456 of this chapter. Section 3. That a new PMC Section 25.12.158 hereby is enacted to read as follows: 25.12.456 THRIFT SHOP. "Thrift shop" means a retail establishment having any portion of its stock -in -trade in "secondhand personal property" as the term is defined in this chapter, which has been donated by the public, and at least 80% of its total floor space devoted to retail sales. Section 4. That Section 25.70.130 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 25.70.130 PAWNSHOPS AND SECONDHAND SHOPS. Pawnshops and secondhand dealers as defined in Section 25.12.360 and 25.12.385, exclusive of consignment stores and thrift shops as defined in sections 25.12.157 and 25.12.456, are prohibited from operating in zones in the C -2 (Central Business District), the C -1 (Retail Business District), the BP (Business Park District) zone, "O" (Office District) zone, C -R (Regional Commercial) Zexe and any residential zone. zoning district. Pawnshops and secondhand dealers are permitted to operate in the C -3 (General Business District) zone and the I -1 (Light Industrial District) zone provided however no new pawnshops and secondhand dealers licenses shall be issued to an establishment located closer than 1,000 feet from an existing pawnshop, consignment store, thrift store or secondhand dealer. All business activities of pawnshops and secondhand dealers located in the C -3 (General Business District) zone shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed structure. Page 2 of 3 Section 5. That a new PMC Section 25.70.131 hereby is enacted to read as follows: 25 70 131 CONSIGNMENT STORES. (1) "Consignment stores" as the term is defined in this chapter, may operate in the C -1 (Retail Business District) and C -2 (Central Business District) Zones• however no new consignment store may locate closer than 1,000 feet from an existing consignment store thrift store, or pawn shop; and, (2) Consignment stores may perate in the C -3 (General Business District) and in the I -1 (Light Industrial District) Zones; however no new consignment store may locate closer than 1,000 feet from an existing consignment store thrift store, or pawn shop; and, (3) All business activities of consignment stores located in the C -1 (Retail Business District) C -2 (Central Business District) and C -3 (General Business District) Zones shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed structure; Section 6. That a new PMC Section 25.70.132 hereby is enacted to read as follows: 25 70 132 THRIFT SHOPS (1) "Thrift shops" as the term is defined in this chapter, may operate in the C -1 (Retail Business district) and C -2 (Central Business District) Zones upon issuance of a Special Permit as per the requirements found in PMC 25.86. however no new thrift shop may locate closer than 1.000 feet from an existing consignment store, thrift store, or pawn shop; and, (2) Thrift shops may operate in the C-3 (General Business District) and in the I -1 (Light Industrial District) Zones; however no new consignment store may locate closer than 1,000 feet from an existing consignment store, thrift store, or pawn shop; and, (3) All business activities of thrift shops in the C -1 (Retail Business District), C -2 (Central Business District) and C -3 (General Business District) Zones shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed structure; Section 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, at its regular meeting of , 2012. Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr City Attorney Page 3 of 3 Goodwill Industries of the Columbia Executive Offices 815 N. Kellogg Street, Suite A Kennewick, WA 99336 June 22, 2012 Mr. Rick White Director of Community Development City of Pasco 525 N. 3rd Avenue Pasco, Washington 99301 Dear Mr. White: RECEIVED JUN 2 5 2012 COM1,1UNRY & ECONOMIC DEVELOP41ENt At last night's Planning Commission Meeting, the subject of Zoning and Amending the PMC Title 25 dealing with secondhand stores in C1 and CBD zoning districts was discussed. A question raised during the public comment portion of the meeting indicated that thrift shops cannot operate in a CR zone, specifically citing the Riverview Shopping Center, Pasco Autoplex and Broadmoor Mall areas in Pasco. The Planning Commission discussed and considered including CR zones as those that allow thrift shops but concluded that it was not something they wished to pursue. Whereas Goodwill is seeking to expand its retail footprint in Pasco; further its mission of education, training and employment for its citizens and increase its positive environmental impact, we have identified a vacant property located in a CR zone which we believe to be a highly desirable location, i.e., location, size, parking and access, etc. Goodwill is requesting that the City consider expanding the definition of allowable zones in which thrift shops can operate include a CR zone. Goodwill agrees to all of the requirements as stated in the new amendment and would appreciate the full consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sinc rely, V Scott J. Shinsato Associate Executive Director Lm Your Donations - Building Job Skills - Changing Lives. J Telephone: (509) 735 -7238 Fax: (509) 735 -8691 June 27, 2012 Rick White City of Pasco Community & Economic Development Director PO Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 RE: Second Hand Stores in C -1 zones. (MF# CA 2012 -03) Mr. White: RECEIVED JUL 0 3 1012 COMMUNITY & ECON0141C OEVELOPNENT I am writing you to ask for your assistance in addressing an important issue that has come up during the Cities work on the revised code. It was discovered during the Planning Commissions public hearing that CR zones would not be allowed to have a Second hand retail store. I am asking the Planning Commission and City council to insert CR into the code. The inclusion of CR zoning within the proposed ordinance will allow us to proceed with a sale to Goodwill and provide a more quality and taxpaying tenant in Riverview Plaza. We feel strongly that Goodwill is the perfect match for our building and for the community. We have been working diligently to secure a reliable Tenant for the old K -Mart building but have thus far been unsuccessful. We have had discussions with applicants that would be fit as far as size and allowed use but they lacked the civic connection that we have been hoping for. Goodwill is the perfect match for the building but more importantly the community. Once again, I would like to request that the zoning designation CR be added to the proposed ordinance. Best Regards, AIQy k.�l ©W �eY AGENDA REPORT NO. 05 FOR: City Counci July 03, 2012 TO: Gary Crutch anager FROM: Abroad Qayouml, Public Works Directo Workshop Mtg.: 07/09/12 Regular Mtg.: 07/16/12 SUBJECT: Road 68 Corridor Study (Argent Road to Powerline Road) I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Resolution 2. Alternative Analysis - Implementation Schedule 3. Road 68 Corridor Study (Council packets only; copy available in Public Works office, the Pasco Library or on the city's website at www.pasco - wa.gov for public review) II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 07/09: Discussion 07/16: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. supporting the recommendations in the Road 68 Corridor Study which include improvements from Argent Road to Powerline Road. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) April 4, 2011, the City approved the consultant proposal from Kittleson & Associates, Inc., authorizing engineering and consulting services with respect to the Road 68 Corridor Study. The study was completed through a public process including an advisory group and developed a 20 -year plan for corridor improvements which will serve as a guideline for development to reduce current congestion and to accommodate future traffic growth, identification of right of way needs, and for application for funding projects along the corridor. B) The study also identifies improvements that can be incorporated in the City's Capital Improvements Plan to enhance capacity, reduce congestion and improve safety. The study also included public participation through open houses. A total of four open house meetings were held to discuss proposed alternatives and findings. A steering committee consisting of business owners and other stakeholders participated in the meetings. V. DISCUSSION: A) On February 13, 2012, staff presented to Council the final recommendations of the Road 68 Corridor Study including potential near term (0 -5 years) improvements and long term (5 -20 years) system improvements (attached). B) Staff recommends deleting the right turn from the west bound off ramp to Road 68 that will provide a direct connection to Convention Place for the following reasons: a. The speed is high from the off ramp and needs longer distance to transition down to 25 mph b. The multi -use path needs to be modified which is costly c. Direct access to businesses on the east side of the road would be limited d. Reduce life of current pavement on the road or major reconstruction of Convention Place to Burden Rd. C) With that deletion, staff recommends Council approve the Road 68 Corridor Study recommendations by Resolution, to be used as a principle guide in making improvements for the Road 68 Corridor. 4(c) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION endorsing the Road 68 Corridor Study. WHEREAS, the pace and nature of urban growth in the vicinity of the Road 68 interchange with I -182 has accelerated realization of traffic congestion on Road 68; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco contracted with Kittleson and Associates (consultant) in April 2011 to analyze current and projected traffic volumes and patterns and to recommend possible roadway and traffic management improvements intended to mitigate congestion within the Road 68 corridor, extending between Powerline and Argent Roads; and WHEREAS, the consultant, following extensive analysis and public input, issued its report in January 2012; and WHEREAS, the City Council, after receiving a presentation of the study and its recommendations, deems the study to represent an appropriate work plan for management of traffic in the Road 68 corridor; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the City Manager and Public Works Director are hereby authorized and directed to utilize the Road 68 corridor study recommendations (attached) to guide Capital Improvement Plan proposals affecting the Road 68 corridor. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, as its regular meeting dated this day of 2012. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney N n 4 u b 0 z° m 4 m v I c E N � N °m E oa c E a Q O H q p a 0 o v 0 0 0 r Y C 0 m c a E a E m Y c 0 m c a E a E m Y �l1 C 0 m c a E a E m Y U1 c 0 m c a E a E m T Vf O - c a E a a p N C 0 m c a E w E m } VI y E = m c « y • N E m c « C G 2 m E w c a v E a > E Y m Vl a 6 d N u C c 01 n « d z c m c a a VI d c m c v a Vf d m c v a Yl d a a a E 3 •3 3 6 L O O O m '0' ° o. a o c c o a o c n •c n c a c c c c c w a y o a ? a E a 0 o c o 0 o c a a 'r m m m m m m c m m o m m m o m �. a s c> c 2 c? o E E c E E E °- c c c o. w 0 w y a s c 3 E n E °' �° i E E E E E a E E °1 E E E v 0 0 a N a a d E •o 0 E o o a a E E C C Y 12 r E c o a N N o y 49 > o n a n n o n n n a n n o E a C o « r 3 o a a c C w o c C w c o o a c0 g > > > > > n m N O N a r O N ' 'o c c 'a L' a F 0 0 °c^ c c `m c c c E uo uo 3° r Nm m m c m m v c o¢ c v E C a 0v °1 c SP E o v N i i as c a L m m e c m « c c Y c v v v L o a a v p 0 0 « a. c E �• s 3 3 c L c c E o 3 0 a c a t2 o a a E i \ m U c 0 0 3 u ii o a E: u m - wO m v m v m v m E g a n. o c c c m 's ¢ ¢ c m N y a Q o m 0 a v 0 0 o a N t v E E E C « Y a N V U V C \ LL m ii '^ C m I m Y m o E 0 E E a. 2 '4 n o o ', o q c 0 c c c a `m « °c a 3 mo y m x « .a. « .m-• .m. a- q p a 0 o v 0 0 0 r Y > wl � v 8 a i N a° U m � b O z I i i 9 c 0 1.1 i C a c a E „ � E o Q C v I O � C I O 0 n 5 a a i o 0 32 I Y J c EE 4° •3 ° •°- X 0 5 m E c E c a J a O E E $0 d �° N a i m y •E 'v3 = m y E � y C O E a E t!1 C O E a E a VI R C O E a E 1!1 C O E a E t!1 • aJ L � a C a v a J a v 9 J a v E 3 a E E m c a v f- t w m J° t v°_ > m c° v °_ °_ > m E O ''0 m 2N`oo c "'o `o c `a ° `o ' � ?i 3 N o c y o s Y o r« v N a a9 a'O �C a�aU aL aH n a a v o.v c a a`i Q E `m E J_ S E J cc d o am a c n 0 o a a a v u o. oc n N tw n0 _ v �« ° n« «u c E o R o '� 3 n y c_ 3 E_ 3 m `0 2 •E N n n 1O E O 'a E o O N Y a 3 a 3 n R V « C C m it N E o o m uJi N E Lao vJi N E m" vai _ u°,3 �" �° c= c x _ �Rc o is u c z.° - L a a o O m 'e c m ai m a n a 9 w aaa u m � � `a C J Deco = m m a e a c a > S o s m a' n �n 01 u c a m Y as E m n n n a O 0 4L < mr o f E o n Jo > y d E o m o Q m m u $ S an d a J v a a c .c .c .c .c 4 .n w W C v I O � C I O 0 n 5 a a i o 0 32 I Y > b p � V e 0 z° G N ¢ M I c F a � Q N c O X q a c w E i O E Q F- C q 1 O io i 5 v 0 0 Y C O s0. c E E `m i d 6 C O H c E E_ `m 6 d C O H c E E `m Ill d C O C a E a E m a 0 M Jl C O C a E a E E N a 0 N Jl C O C a E a n E N a 0 N .n C O C a E a y E E m l^ a 3 o a N L Jl 3 C O C a E a n E N a o N vl C O C a E ad e E E m m a 3 o a N L Jl 3 C O C a E a y E E 10 R a 3 o a N L Jl 3 C O C a E a n E N a o N C O C a E a n E ` v 0 N C O C a E a n E N a 0 N C O C a E a n E N a 0 M C O C a E a n E + y `m v > a O' C C O C a E a v E m E N N a 3 O a N L `o 0 u 10 O 3 F � o v 3 a m y y a a � m � ' n v 3 q v c o a E N a a E w a c £ i w m v v v v v v v v v v v v v N a L v •t a a a a a a a a a a a a a ? 3 a o C r Y C r r C r C C C r C C a a a a a a a a a a a a a o a E o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m e m E U u m w a C E C `a C C C `a C 's a a a v C > O E O C 0 � 0 •-� L m � C c a m c a a0+ m !a L o i v m c o In c m m a i0 o a y T C 'O 0 a C o W m t c O a .O a .O N C O m Y O H O 6 L Y t C pCp L = w w m IL 'O N N y L+ O - r m 6 a a x a 2 m a v o a o ti v a a v v r w m :: _ n m o. a w c o v a j m m m m = y o m w m E m° v s° c° 10 e c Y E E m 2 L m m _ m c m m '^ m `m a w v s s v Y u u a a a Yl o oa 3 r o v o m v v w u s u o z z z C q 1 O io i 5 v 0 0 Y c'' n � a N i E I U b ' 0 i o n c N tt�j a e w r U Q Q F 0 N a' r-I v v U a Q G O G! U N F v n. 0 U L 7 0. i6 F m u U a O v F v L 0. C d m c a! O C0. F m G 4:. v Y y rli C m 7 V X_ F a d a o` 0 d E 0 It c 0 C a E a E E N } O c 0 C a E a n E N } d c 0 C a E a n E N y O c 0 C a E a n E N Y O c 0 C a E a n E N } d c 0 C a E a n E N y O c 0 C a E a E E N y O c 0 C a E a n E N Y O c 0 C a E a n E N > d C v v v v a v y a N a v a N a a v � v a v a a a a a a a a a c c c c c c a c c c a U a V V D V V U � C C C C C C C C V U V U V a E V o V o U 0 0 0 q 0 0 0 0 c c c c c c e c p vi ui vi �i �i �i vi vi �i a E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L U V V V U U V U } V U D D D D D D a D 1] m a a a a a a a a a .J E E .E E E E E E m J N W d Y 6 p m t Y C j m m m w c m N D _ m c 1 a p m h C mD a a O V C D a m m v E D c o c m o o y 9 a E 3 0 t i m D to n m v 0 w " w c 0 n w m Y o q D c D >> 0 o m u m E E c a A a C H A 9 y "6 m O D O a0 ( N O o In' 3 a m •D-in m 3 v C a m E m D m u � a \ C w °n o ° w c « c e m a c 3 s > c n °- n 1° i Q 0 m a ¢ u o o y 0 °c c o v u0 _ _ F 0 N a' r-I v v U a Q G O G! U N F v n. 0 U L 7 0. i6 F m u U a O v F v L 0. C d m c a! O C0. F m G 4:. v Y y rli C m 7 V X_ F a d a o` 0 d E 0 It CITY OF PASCO ROAD 68 CORRIDOR STUDY June 2012 I I fi 1 & ASSOCIATES, INC. l /IKITTELSON 1 11 A N S 1 O R T A T O N E N G N E E R I N G I P L A N N I N G THIS DOCUMENT OR PORTIONS THEREOF IS PROTECTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 23 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 409 AS FOLLOWS: Title 23 U.S.C. §409 Discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and surveys Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data. PREFACE Road 68 Corridor Plan Preface The progress of this plan was guided by City staff, members of a volunteer Advisory Committee, and feedback from the community at large. In addition, staff from the Washington State Department of Transportation provided valuable insights and recommendations. City staff and Advisory Committee members are identified below, along with members of the Consultant Team. The Advisory Committee members devoted a substantial amount of time and effort to the development of the Road 68 Corridor Plan and their participation was instrumental in the development of this document. City staff and the Consultant Team believe that the city's future transportation system will be better because of their commitment. City of Pasco Staff Ahmad Qayoumi, PE Public Works Director Michael Pawlak, PE City Engineer Advisory Committee Members Steve Brooks Chris Bornhoft Chris Eerkes Kurt Lukins Jana Kempf Dirk Stricker Consultant Team, Kittelson &Associates, Inc. Chris Brehmer, PE Katie Pincus John Ringert, PE �MWXWA. . � 5 Road 68 Corridor Plan 6 INTRODUCTION Road 68 Corridor Plan The Road 68 Corridor Plan represents the A sub-area plan completed for the corridor culmination of a six-month planning effort in 2004 identified a series of transportation that identifies Priority 0 to 5-year, 0 to 5- improvement recommendations between (- year, and 5 to 20-year transportation 182 and Sandifur Parkway that have since infrastructure improvements necessary to been implemented. While widening and meet existing and anticipated transportation intersection improvements have been made demand within and through the corridor. in the section of Road 68 between 1-182 and The corridor plan is organized into the Sandifur Parkway, those improvements are following sections: now nearing their effective capacity and new traffic operations and safety concerns • Introduction are emerging on the corridor. • Existing Conditions Assessment • Future Conditions Assessment Study Area • Alternatives Analysis The project focuses on the Road 68 • Improvement Recommendations Corridor between Powerline Road and Argent Road and on Burden Boulevard This section provides an overview of the between Road 68 and Road 60. Exhibit 1 corridor history, plan purpose, study area, illustrates the study area. and study process. Operations and safety of 8 signalized History intersections and 10 unsignalized intersections were examined in detail The City of Pasco is a thriving community through the study. nestled in the ever expanding Tri-Cities region. Despite the lagging national -_ economy, the City has enjoyed rapid residential growth over the last decade and I now has a population of over 56,000. Many of the City's new residents are living, shopping, and/or recreating within an increasingly vibrant development area s�. .ter expanding along the Road 68 Corridor. Road 68 is a north-south Principal Arterial that conveys traffic movements within both Franklin County and the City. The City recognizes Road 68's increasing near-term Land uses in the study area consist of a mix and future importance, including a potential of agricultural, residential, office, retail, and future extension of the corridor across the recreational facilities. As shown in Exhibit 1, Columbia River. active agricultural farm land is also located in and around the study area. ` " 9 Road 68 Corridor Plan Why Study Road 68? This study builds on a Exhibit 1 —Site Vicinity and Study Area previously completed sub- area plan to create a comprehensive 20-year plan for the Road 68 Corridor OWE LINE RD from W. Argent Road north to the Pasco city limits. The �vr -- plan contains a set of '■" �` ' "" '' - prioritized multimodal , improvements for the corridor, including strategies CIF , to improve safety and p efficiently manage access, ,. as well as a summary of +w° * " Y w right-of-way needs toILE'1ff* DR F µ Fp E implement the improvements. The plan r equips the City to pursue and obtain funding to B�1FIE �LV[ M r implement the identified projects and strategies. CORRIDOR OVERVIEW ` From its southern terminus near the shores of the ' = r Columbia River, the roadway carries traffic north on a two- } ' lane section through a relatively rural residential setting largely within the w I'Uf�GENUR unincorporated County. ` *.` . North of Argent Road the E corridor transitions into developing areas that include master planned development east of the roadway along Chapel Hill Boulevard and potential future annexation areas to the west. 10 Road 68 Corridor Plan Fire Station 83 is located on the east side of The need for careful coordination with Road 68 north of Argent Road. WSDOT in implementing signal timing and traffic control changes; and Road 68 has a grade-separated interchange with Interstate 182 (I-182), including two Unique design vehicle traffic, including signalized ramps operated and maintained oversize vehicles and farming by the Washington State Department of equipment. Transportation (WSDOT). A rapidly growing commercial and entertainment area is developing north of 1- 182. In addition to hosting major commercialh retailers, the area between 1-182 and � Burden Boulevard also serves major event centers including Gesa Stadium (home of the Tri-Cities Dust Devils minor league baseball team) and the TRAC Center. As special event facilities, Gesa Stadium and the TRAC Center offer a tremendous Between Burden Boulevard and Sandifur community resource while also creating Parkway, the five-lane Road 68 corridor unique travel demands for the Road 68 generally operates with a two-way center corridor. left-turn lane serving commercial properties The section of Road 68 between I-182 and on both sides of the roadway. A traffic signal Burden Boulevard presents some at Wrigley Drive provides additional access to the commercial areas as well as to the particularly unique challenges including: residential neighborhood to the west. The Peak surges in event traffic to and from properties south of Wrigley Drive are TRAC and Gesa Stadium; approaching build-out while the properties Lane balance and utilization issues to the north continue to develop. between the interchange and Burden Boulevard; An important part of the Road 68 corridor study involves assessing safety and access A right-turn "trap" lane traveling south on management needs between Burden Road 68 between Burden Boulevard and Boulevard and Sandifur Parkway. There is a the interchange (fixed as a result of this need to preserve north-south through corridor plan effort); mobility while also carefully balancing the Existing geometric constraints at the need for safe and efficient movements to Burden Boulevard/Road 68 signalized and from the commercial areas. intersection; Growing traffic volumes and While outside the study area, the continuation of Road 68 north of Sandifur corresponding queue storage needs; Parkway serves an area with a mix of Road 68 Corridor Plan residential and agricultural development. are referenced throughout the Anticipated future residential expansion in Implementation Plan. This section includes this area is expected to place further an overview of the three documents and a vehicular demand on the corridor. brief description of the material presented in each. Plan Process Technical Memorandum#1:Existing Conditions The plan was initiated in June 2011 and Assessment was adopted in XY 2012. Presents a summary of the data collection efforts and existing roadway The plan process was guided by input and characteristics, operations, and safety guidance obtained from community findings. members, City staff and WSDOT staff, and Technical Memorandum#2:Future Conditions the Benton-Franklin Council of Assessment Governments staff. A series of four public Presents a summary of forecast future meetings were held to solicit community year 2030 conditions and deficiencies feedback and present ideas. The workshops assuming build-out of the corridor. included: Technical Memorandum#3:Alternatives Assessment • September 14, 2011: Project Kick-off, Presents a summary of the improvement overview, and existing conditions alternatives identified, feedback summary received, and the resulting future • October 19, 2011: Overview and update operations under the preferred • November 16, 2011: Future conditions alternative. overview and alternatives analysis Each of these documents are available for • December 14, 2011: Presentation of review from the City of Pasco. recommended improvements A project Advisory Committee was formed and provided guidance reflecting the business, residential, and other community members interested in improving the " ` corridor. Supporting Documentation As part of the plan process, three detailed technical documents were prepared to support development of the corridor plan. Data and information from these documents 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT Road 68 Corridor Plan This section provides a description of the existing conditions along the Road 68 and Burden Boulevard corridors. The existing conditions analysis identifies the current e conditions of the transportation facilities and land uses along the corridor. Roadway Characteristics The existing Road 68 corridor is a two-to- five lane facility between Argent Road and Powerline Road. Burden Boulevard is a three-lane road west of Road 68 and a four- Many driveways north of Burden lane road between Road 68 and Road 60 to Boulevard are routinely blocked by north- the east. south traffic waiting to pass through the signalized intersections. Traffic volumes on the Road 68 corridor Many driveways along Burden Boulevard range from approximately 10,000 average allow left-turns in but Burden Boulevard daily trips on the southern end to up to itself lacks eastbound and westbound approximately 40,000 average daily trips left-turn lanes at key locations. near Burden Boulevard. Traffic volumes along Road 68 are highest between 1-182 While several traffic signals are provided and Burden Boulevard. along the corridor, they are operated in isolation (uncoordinated) due to a current Notable aspects of the corridors include: lack of communications equipment. Sidewalks are provided along Road 68 Intersection Operations north of 1-182 up to Sandifur Parkway. Sidewalks are provided intermittently Traffic counts were completed at key study along the north side of Burden Boulevard intersections during four periods: within the study area and a path system is provided for the length of the study Weekday morning (7-9 a.m.) area on the south side of Burden Weekday evening (4-6 p.m.) Boulevard. Saturday with TRAC event No designated on-street bicycle facilities Saturday without TRAC event are provided in the study area. Based on the traffic counts, it was found Driveways serving private properties that weekday evening peak hour conditions generally allow full turning movements generally represent peak congestion and (left, right, and through) and tend to have occur between approximately 4:50 and 5:50 been installed without following specific p.m. Events at the TRAC Center or Gesa spacing standards. stadium can result in peak demand that is higher but they tend to be less predictable, 15 Road 68 Corridor Plan seasonal, and are more concentrated in and around the Exhibit 2— Existing Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions TRAC Center area. P; 6 44 An operational analysis was t prepared for key study *� _ intersections during each of °�•r 'v 7 OIL 3-UITIILT Er f- 1N the four time periods and at ,� A r all of the study intersections ,•� ,� P L ' during the weekday p.m. �� peak hour. Exhibit 2 illustrates the weekday p.m. , ff peak hour analysis findings, m�-M �� reflecting the intersection RIGLEY DR ". operational performance with one of three colors: - Green: Well under = ff;! r, capacity 2-cBURDEN BL'V[J ', Yellow: Approaching - capacity Red: At or over capacity Key areas of recurring congestion include the Ai t Burden Boulevard/Road 68 signal, the privater ,� r . �rid, •,Ar driveways between Burden Boulevard and Wrigley Drive, and the east end of Burden Boulevard. Long : __ delays experienced at ,, to JCMM p 19 rivate driveways tend to be associated with exiting left-turns and through movements across Road 68 or Burden Boulevard. Further details regarding the existing conditions analysis are presented in Technical Memorandum #1. 16 Road 68 Corridor Plan Safety Exhibit 3- Safety Analysis Findings •, . . P1 'EFLIIV E rD The crash histories of the major study intersections ' 1 and segments along Road' x�+ 68 and Burden Boulevard were reviewed in an effort G F to identify potential safety # - 4 =i r deficiencies. Exhibit 3 �' visually illustrates safety ay ^�+ ' �+ ," � findings. Technical Memorandum #1 contains f4i "*" � ' further details. Key findings VF .GIEE`�'' of the safety review ; 1� e include: " ' Crash rates at the study intersections are4 � ► generally below industry f standard. A high prevalence of - angle/turning crashes y a was observed at the signalized Road 68/Burden Boulevard intersection apparently related to the r 'S ► southbound left-turn � } movement protected/permissive - •,. signal phasing. � ± The segments of Road 68 from I-182 to Rodeo TIM *' : ARIGE l D '= Drive, Rodeo Drive to Burden Boulevard, and Burden Boulevard to Wrigley Drive have crash Boulevard experience a high rates higher than the statewide average. number of southbound rear end crashes. o The segments of Road 68 from 1-182 to Rodeo Drive o The segment of Road 68 and Rodeo Drive to Burden from Burden Boulevard to 17 Road 68 Corridor Plan Wrigley Drive has a high number of angle/turning crashes related to unsignalized driveways. o The segment of Burden Boulevard from Road 68 to Clemente Lane has a crash rate higher than the statewide average. This segment experienced a high number of driveway-related angle/turning crashes, however, a raised median has been constructed that 4 has eliminated some potential conflicts. The segment of Road 68 between Burden as Boulevard and the 1-182 interchange g . ramps was restriped in the summer of 2011 to eliminate a southbound "trap lane" condition (implementing a recommendation of this corridor plan). 1 �r-- V 1 � p i Ai I 18 FUTURE CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT Road 68 Corridor Plan This section describes the network of - New 1-182 On and Off Ramps at Road funded roadway improvements and the 52; and modeling scenarios developed to evaluate • An additional southbound right-turn lane future roadway capacity, access on Road 68 at the I-182 westbound on- management needs, as well as pedestrian ramp. and bicycle facility needs. A sensitivity analysis was also prepared to Future Year 2030 ensure that the BFCOG model volumes Conditions adequately represented build-out of lands per City zoning. The future analysis focused on projected conditions in the horizon year 2030 and was ^R°^ µ BURC7rEfrl BLVD developed to help inform the alternatives evaluation. Traffic operations were analyzed p Y with various future connectivity and ROAD 76 EXTENSION intersection improvements to determine i constraints on the network. Through the _ N future conditions analysis, improvements ' were identified to improve auto and ^' ' pedestrian/bicycle travel times throughout the study area. CHAPEL HILL EXTENSION FUTURE VOLUME PROJECTIONS h ' �, _ aR�ENT-Ra ' The Benton-Franklin County Council of Government (BFCOG) regional travel Intersection Operations demand forecasting model was used in developing traffic volumes for the future An operational assessment of year 2030 scenarios in this study. weekday p.m. peak hour conditions was prepared for all of the study intersections The 2030 build model scenario generally using the projected traffic volumes. Exhibit 4 assumes build-out of vacant properties illustrates the future conditions analysis within the study area based on the City's findings using the same color-coded system comprehensive plan and includes the presented in the Existing Conditions following roadway improvements: sections. Chapel Hill Extension from Road 68 to Road 84; Road 76 Extension from Burden Boulevard to Argent Road; . . # 21 qlqff Road 68 Corridor Plan Key Findings operating unacceptably should be restricted, or that vehicles will redistribute due to long The 2030 operations analysis resulted in the delays if no mitigation is implemented. following findings: Technical Memorandum #2 documents the The Road 76 extension reduces travel future conditions analysis and findings in demand on Road 68 by creating a detail. parallel north-south facility. The Chapel Hill Boulevard Exhibit 4— Future Weekday PM Peak Hour Conditions Extension offers an important new east-west .° rsq.F POWERLINE RD a alternative to 1-182 and Argent Road. - , Even with the Road 76 and 'x, #, a ' `" 0,: Chapel Hill Boulevard °° extensions, there are still ' additional capacity • - SAN I��IC'1R04PI{ improvement needs. � tt1��iieey�y5y? L't The signalized intersections of 68/Burden RI E 0 Road + EY"D R ` `Ontm " pia„ Boulevard and Road . 68/Chapel Hill Boulevard _` ` operate over-capacity. ` ; " '° '-� BUR�]Ehl F3LfQ I *�y Three unsignalized driveways along Road 68 ° (Blockbuster Driveway, Walmart Driveway, and the - McDonalds Driveway) -7 operate unacceptably. _ _ dl— Three unsignalized intersections along Burden Boulevard (Clemente Lane, trt ,, rte Homerun Road, and Road °- 60) operate unacceptably. - x' �r _ X41 �'--" '� 'f Y.•tr iy i An unsignalized intersection operating unacceptably can . A r.L "?"��r indicate that the intersection = "- � ,.�. = AIEIT =RD �-� may warrant signalization to improve operations, that specific movements that are 22 ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION Road 68 Corridor Plan This section describes the range of boards were also made available after the improvements that were developed to presentation to allow the community to address existing and projected future provide comments and vote for their corridor needs. preferred solutions in situations where multiple options were available. Areas with Improvement multiple potential options voted on by the Alternatives public are summarized below. A series of multimodal improvement options ACCESS MANAGEMENT were identified through the corridor planning process to address existing and future Access management refers to the transportation system deficiencies. The systematic implementation and control of options included strategies to improve the location, spacing, design, and system operations, manage access, and to operations of driveways, median openings, provide multimodal facilities to improve and street connections to a roadway. It capacity and connectivity. involves roadway design applications, such as median treatments and the appropriate While many of the alternatives explored spacing and design of side-street were interrelated, the improvement intersections. Access management alternatives were generally classified into techniques and strategies help to preserve one of six areas for discussion and tracking the transportation system investment and purposes. The topic improvement areas guard against deteriorations in safety and were: increased congestion. Access management seeks to balance the need for land use • Traffic signal; activities and property parcels to be served • Access management; • Reducing weaving along Road 68; • Signing/Other improvements; '—Major Arterial • Connectivity/Capacity improvements; Minor,4rteria! and • Pedestrian/bicycle system Major Collector improvements. 0 The improvement alternatives were Minor Collector presented to the community at a project open house held on November 16, 2011. During that meeting a PowerPoint Laca3 Street presentation was made offering an overview of all of the improvement ACCESS options. Work stations with display 25 Road 68 Corridor Plan with appropriate access while preserving PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE safe and efficient movement of traffic. IMPROVEMENTS Three access management alternatives were identified for Road 68. They were to: A mapping exercise was completed to identify key areas with missing or Maintain existing conditions; incomplete pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Limit driveway access along Road 68 to This information was summarized in a map right-in/right-out only; or for public review and comment. Limit driveways along Road 68 to right- in/right-out only and provide left-in movements where possible from a rE T queuing perspective. - = Ultimately, the option of limiting driveways along Road 68 to right-in/right-out only and providing left-in movements where possible was selected as the preferred alternative given the desire to improve corridor operations and safety while balancing the access needs of local businesses. 1-182 IN I ERGHANGE ALTERNATIVES Four interchange improvement alternatives Alternatives Analysis were identified to address long-term Outcomes capacity needs as well as weaving along Road 68 between 1-182 and Burden Extensive feedback was provided by City Boulevard. The alternatives were: staff and the community through the public open house. In addition, Washington State A near-term reconstruction of the Department of Transportation (WSDOT) westbound 1-182/Road 68 ramp staff attended the public meeting and intersection; subsequently provided written feedback A split-diamond interchange concept; regarding the interchange improvement options presented as well as a fifth option A partial Road 76 interchange concept; & suggested at the open house. A Road 76/Road 68 couplet concept. Ultimately, a fifth hybrid alternative was Technical Memorandum #3 provides a selected as the recommended summary of the alternatives analysis, the improvement. disposition of each of the improvements, and an intersection operations assessment with the recommended measures. 26 IMPROVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Road 68 Corridor Plan The future of the Road 68 corridor ultimately activities that support implementation of the relies on the shared roles of multiple travel three improvement phases, respectively. modes as well as the willingness of public Each table lists the project name, project agencies and private development to shape description, lead agency, and an anticipated the community in a thoughtful manner. order-of-magnitude cost estimate where applicable. Implementation Strategy Planning-level cost estimates of each A phased implementation strategy was activity are provided in the tables. Note that developed for improving the Road 68 the cost estimates do not include right-of- corridor in a methodical process. The way acquisition costs. Further, cost implementation is divided into three phases estimates are omitted for some activities of improvements: Priority 0- to 5-year, because they do not require direct cash Additional 0- to 5-year, and 5- to 20-year. expenditure, they mostly include City staff Individual projects were not tied to specific time or, in a few cases, because the City years but those locations requiring a implemented and completed the project specific order to the improvements were based on the study recommendations prior noted. to publication of the final report. The final sequencing is expected to evolve Each table includes color shading that based on local development activities (that corresponds to six improvement categories may complete some projects in conjunction for ease of identification. with frontage improvements), City funding sources, and evolution of corridor needs in Access Management the years ahead. Access management implementation As with the Alternatives Analysis, the language recommendations are offered for recommended improvements in each phase the Road 68 corridor following the have been characterized in one of six implementation tables. categories: • Traffic signal projects • Access management projects • Reducing weaving along Road 68 • Signing/Other improvements • Connectivity/Capacity improvements • Pedestrian/Bicycle Improvements Implementation Tables Tables 1, 2, and 3 summarize the specific P � a + # 29 Road 68 Corridor Plan Priority 0- to 5-Year Improvement Recommendations Table 1 - Implementation Plan for Priority 0-to 5-Year Corridor Improvements ID # Activity Prerequisites Cost ROW Traffic Signal Projects A Convert southbound protected permitted left-turn signal at Burden _ $3,500 - Boulevard/Road 68 to protected only left-turn Restripe westbound Burden Boulevard approach,convert B eastbound/westbound approaches at Burden Blvd./Road 68 from split $15,000 phase to protected only left-turns using lead-lag phasing,provide new westbound advance signing C Install traffic signal fire pre-emption capability(Equip City of Pasco Fire _ $60,000 - Station 83 vehicles and traffic signals) Access Management Projects A Require cross-over easements and shared access among new development B Install raised median treatments on Road 68 between Burden Signal ID#C $70,000 - Boulevard and Starbuck's C Reconstruct median treatment on Burden Boulevard at Clemente Lane _ $116,000 - to prohibit southbound left-turn Signing/Other Improvements Modify Burden Boulevard/Road 76 westbound intersection sign A (Remove stop sign,add advisory curve signs with 15-MPH placard, _ $5,500 - crosswalk signs,stripe centerline—See Technical Memorandum#3 Oattachments) B Modify overhead lane use signs at Road 68/Burden Boulevard Completed by City in December 2011 intersection C Add Eastbound 1-182 advance signing on Road 68 southbound - $6,300 - Connectivity/Capacity Improvements Right-of-Way A Extend Wrigley Drive between Clemente Lane and Convention Drive Dedication by $470,000 Needed' owner(s) Pedestrian-Bicycle Improvements A Argent Road/Road 68 intersection:Add pedestrian ramps/sidewalks, _ $58,000 - pedestrian pushbuttons and pedestrian signals B Revise pedestrian crosswalk or relocate push-button locations at _ $9,000 - Wrigley Drive/Road 68 signal C Provide countdown pedestrian signal heads and ADA-compliant Inherent to all new traffic signals pushbuttons at all new traffic signals D Consider providing leading pedestrian interval at signalized City staff intersections time E Develop bicycle plan for the area as part of City Transportation System Plan Total Excluding Right-of-Way Acquisition Costs $813,300 ROW=Right-of-way Right-of-way and relocation or removal of irrigation pivot required prior to construction. 30 Road 68 Corridor Plan Figure 1 Priority 0-to 5-Year Improvement Project Locations }4 re , 1' _ C-p �9 ' B y. '7�lp� i� �•s�`y 1 31 Road 68 Corridor Plan Additional 0- to 5-Year Improvement Recommendations Table 2 - Implementation Plan for Additional 0-to 5-Year Corridor Improvements ID # Activity Prerequisites Cost ROW Traffic Signal Projects Provide traffic signal interconnect on Road 68(between Sandifur D Parkway and Argent Road,linking with Convention Place-Convention $36,000 Drive/Burden Boulevard signal); Re-time traffic signals/develop coordinated signal timing plans Replace existing protected-permissive left-turn signal displays with E Flashing Yellow Arrow protected-permissive left-turn signal displays $43,000 (signals on Road 68 at Sandifur Parkway,Wrigley Drive,and Argent Road+Burden/Convention) Access Management Projects D Complete installation of raised median treatments on Road 68 Signal ID#C $120,000 between Burden Boulevard and Sandifur Parkway E Install future median treatments on Road 68 north of Sandifur Signal ID#C;Assume part Parkway in conjunction with development of Connectivity/Capacity#E Reducing Weaving Along Road 68 Reconfigure I-182/Road 68 Westbound Ramp by providing direct connection to Convention Drive. Project includes limiting access ® south of Homerun Road,constructing new connectivity to fitness area A parking,constructing a roundabout at the Homerun Road/Convention $3,075,000 Needed`" Drive intersection,modifying the bike/pedestrian path location/crossing and constructing a new northbound right-turn lane at Burden Boulevard.See Technical Memorandum#3 attachments. Signing/Other Improvements D Construct an eastbound right-turn lane on Burden Boulevard at $75,000 Potential* Clemente Lane E Construct an eastbound right-turn lane on Burden Boulevard at $255,000 Potential* Convention Place(includes signal modification) F Construct an eastbound right-turn lane on Burden Boulevard at the $75,000 Potential* TRAC Center Parking Lot driveway G Construct an eastbound left-turn lane on Burden Boulevard(replace $101,000 ♦ landscaped median,relocate street lighting) H Construct a westbound left-turn lane on Burden Boulevard(replace $101,000 landscaped median,relocate street lighting) I Construct an eastbound left-turn lane on Burden Boulevard(replace $101,000 landscaped median,relocate street lighting) J Construct an eastbound left-turn lane on Burden Boulevard(replace $101,000 landscaped median,relocate street lighting) K Construct a westbound left-turn lane on Burden Boulevard(replace $101,000 landscaped median,relocate street lighting) -Table 2 Continued on Next Page- ROW=Right-of-way *Potential=Right-of-way may be needed,further review advised during design,likely dedication in conjunction with adjacent development. **Needed=Right-of-way dedication is needed,likely dedication in conjunction with adjacent development. 32 Road 68 Corridor Plan Figure 2 Additional 0-to 5-Year Improvement Project Locations I - •• .. _ - - p B r ° E' _ OU M r' !wa 4w 4¢_ T i!! A- I L WAL®WQ f - �� '�-� j °�- .* �� •'� r ��w-rya� •5 f k IRS z - E' _I a r ' .v y yg 1 . . 33 Road 68 Corridor Plan Table 2 Continued - Implementation Plan for Additional 0-to 5-Year Corridor Improvements ID # Activity Prerequisites Cost ROW Connectivity/Capacity Improvements B Complete Convention Drive(west side half-street)between Wrigley Right-of-Way $385,000 Needed`* Drive and Theater Property C Complete Road 76 eastern half-street improvement between Right-of-Way $357,000 Needed** WalMart frontage and Wrigley Drive D Complete Road 76 eastern half-street improvement between Wrigley Right-of-Way $357,000 Needed`* Drive and City Water Tower Property E Widen Road 68 to 5-lanes between Sandifur Parkway and Powerline Right-of-Way $4,168,000 Potential* Road F Add northbound right-turn lane at 1-182 Eastbound/Road 68 Ramp Right-of-Way $255,000 Potential* Pedestrian-Bicycle Improvements Install Active Crosswalk Devices at Burden Boulevard/Road 60: Realign north-south crosswalk out of driveway apron area,assume F Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon for north-south crosswalk across $60,000 Burden Boulevard, provide curb extensions at Burden Boulevard/Road 60 G Extend sidewalk from north side of Walmart west to Road 76 Right-of-Way $65,000 Needed** H Retrofit existing traffic signals to provide countdown pedestrian $58,000 signal heads I Provide wayfinding signs along bicycle and pedestrian paths - Total Excluding Right-of-Way Acquisition Costs $9,889,000 ROW=Right-of-way *Potential=Right-of-way may be needed,further review advised during design,likely dedication in conjunction with adjacent development. **Needed=Right-of-way dedication is needed,likely dedication in conjunction with adjacent development. 34 Road 68 Corridor Plan Figure 2 Additional 0-to 5-Year Improvement Project Locations (Repeated) 4 E e F .luAQ[lld" F r t VVr a �.. ;IM, b-AFLIMLINLYQ - -. Ile At W11.1b 5 L 1 35 Road 68 Corridor Plan 5- to 20-Year Improvement Recommendations Table 3 - Implementation Plan for 5-to 20-Year Corridor Improvements ID # Activity Prerequisites Cost ROW Traffic Signal Projects F Provide additional traffic signal interconnect with all future traffic _ $2,000 each signals G Advanced real-time traffic control system connected to traffic management center H Signalize Burden Boulevard/Road 60 intersection $250,000 B I Modify Road 68/Chapel Hill Boulevard intersection: Provide Right-of-Way $425,000" Needed— southbound right-turn lane and westbound right-turn lane J Signalize Road 76/Chapel Hill Boulevard intersection Completed in $300,000 Needed— K Signalize Road 84/Chapel Hill Boulevard intersection conjunction $300,000 Needed`* with L Signalize Road 76/Burden Boulevard intersection Connectivity $300,000 Needed— projects I,J, K M Signalize Road 76/Argent Road intersection &L below $300,000 Needed** Connectivity/Capacity Improvements G Construct a northbound right-turn lane at on Road 68 at Chapel Hill Right-of-Way $255,000 Needed— Boulevard(requires traffic signal modification) H Fire Station 83 Access Improvements(secondary access route or If needed $200,000+ Unknown fire station traffic signal) I Chapel Hill Boulevard Extension(Road 68 to Road 84),5-lane road & with bicycle lanes and sidewalks Right-of-Way $9,000,000 Needed— J K Road 76 Extension(Burden Boulevard to Argent Road),3-lane & road with bicycle lanes and sidewalks, 1-182 crossing Right-of-Way $10,205,000 Needed* L M Road 68 Widening(Chapel Hill Boulevard to Argent Road),5-lane Right-of-Way $2,902,000 Needed— road with bicycle lanes and sidewalks N Argent Road/Road 68 Improvements:add southbound right-turn Right-of-Way $255,000 Needed** lane(requires traffic signal modification) O Argent Road/Road 68 Improvements:add westbound right-turn Right-of-Way $300,000 Needed** lane(requires traffic signal and controller modification) P Sandifur Parkway widening(Road 68 to Convention Drive),5-lane Right-of-Way $2,779,000 Needed— road with bicycle lanes and sidewalks Total Excluding Right-of-Way Acquisition Costs $27,771,000 Pedestrian-Bicycle Improvements • Provide north-south sidewalk connection through Road 68/1-182 Will require separate study with WSDOT J interchange to determine potential improvement options ROW=Right-of-way *Potential=Right-of-way may be needed,further review advised during design, likely dedication in conjunction with adjacent development. **Needed=Right-of-way dedication is needed,likely dedication in conjunction with adjacent development. NOTES:The alternatives analysis recommended the potential need for dual southbound right-turn lanes at Road 68/1-182 westbound continue to be monitored despite it not being shown in the 5-to 20-year horizon.Also,potential long-term future provision of westbound dual right-turns at the Road 68/1-182 westbound ramp could be considered if additional mitigation is required beyond the measures recommended in Table 3. 36 Road 68 Corridor Plan Figure 3 5 to 20-Year Improvement Project Locations VAF . Jy •� , P 1 _ r �.- f ;�f`Faa•. _ - -_ ° ,r-, to... s.... _ .t�- •I+';- - 1 - I r G:LI� A f M 1. rt{. �/V�� .. s A - _ ' R4�CC11 idl&1 A % 1 i ice '' C J F.r ',A �+y� EPkIFL L'PPRL FLYG h'°"? r i Mr N1 1 1 16 ,�,� � fAi _ a 7w N" Pli a �Y�t?k - . . 37 Road 68 Corridor Plan Access Management Implementation Language Recommendations The City of Pasco should adopt local access management standards and policies for Road 68 in the Study Area as provisions in the city's development code. Recommended access management standards for properties abutting Road 68 are as follows: Signalized public streets intersections allowing full turn movements should be separated a minimum of 1,000 feet apart (measured centerline to centerline). Public streets allowing restricted turn movements should be separated a minimum of 500 feet apart (measured centerline to centerline). Developments along with Road 68 with frontage on another street should locate their driveway(s) on the lower functional classified roadway. Driveways should be located to align with opposing driveways where possible. Driveways allowing right-turn in/right-turn out only movements should be spaced a minimum of 200 feet apart (measured centerline to centerline). Multiple driveways may be permitted so long as they satisfy the driveway access spacing standards and their benefit can be demonstrated through an engineering analysis. If spacing standards cannot be met, effort should be made to consolidate access points with neighboring properties. Where standards cannot be met and joint access is not feasible, temporary conditional access may be granted in conjunction with binding requirements that property owners provide crossover easements on compatible parcels (considering topography, access, and land use) to facilitate future access between adjoining parcels. When permanent accesses are eventually constructed to serve the adjoining parcels, temporary accesses shall be eliminated. Modifications to the access spacing standards may be granted at the discretion of the City Public Works Director based on an approved engineering study. Figure 4 illustrates the application of cross-over easements and conditional access permits over time to achieve the desired access management objectives. The individual steps are described in Table 4. As illustrated in the figure and supporting table, using these guidelines, driveways located along Road 68 will eventually move in the overall direction of the access spacing standards as development and redevelopment occurs along the corridor. 38 Road 68 Corridor Plan Figure 4 Example of Cross-over Easement/Consolidation/Conditional Access Process I tOT A I LOT I LOT C I LOT R LGIT A I LOT B 1 LOT!C I LOT[D 1 i 74-Minimum ACCOss Spaeing ■ vw uE rx .,.,f.M AC....S gi Redevelppmsnl L;1 LOT B STEP 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT 8 I LOT A I LOT B I LOT G I LOT D I I LOT A I LOT R I LOT C I LOT 6 Rig M 891 W;: AIPQ ■ereua.reu.wra Min,mum Access$paring Reueeelopmenr 17"1 LOT A LOT 0 STEP 2 STEP .s I LOT A I LOT B I LOT G I LOT❑ I I LOT A I LOT B LC-T ......,-:? i I ■c.o,.b,w eu.,om MintmUm Access Spacing Rvdwve1vV"-1 ■` ''",LA,° Minimum Access Spacing LOT C, Complete STEP 4 STEP 5 39 Road 68 Corridor Plan Table 4. Example of Crossover Easement/Consolidation /Conditional Access Process Process Step EXISTING —Currently Lots A, B, C, and D have site-access driveways that neither meet the access spacing criteria nor align with driveways or access points on the opposite side of the 1 roadway. Under these conditions motorists may be exposed to potential conflicting left turns with opposing traffic. Additionally, the number of side-street (or site-access driveway) intersections may reduce the operation and safety of the roadway. REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT B—At the time that Lot B redevelops, the city would review the proposed site plan and make recommendations to ensure that the site could promote future crossover or consolidated access. Next, the city would issue conditional permits for the 2 development to provide crossover easements with Lots A and C, and city would grant a conditional access permit to the lot. After evaluating the land use action, the city would determine that LOT B does not have either alternative access, nor can an access point be aligned with an opposing access point, nor can the available lot frontage provide an access point that meets the access spacing criteria set forth for segment of roadway. REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT A—At the time Lot A redevelops, the city would undertake the same review process as with the redevelopment of LOT B (see Step 2); however, under this scenario the city would use the previously obtained cross-over easement at Lot B consolidate 3 the access points of Lots A and B. city would then relocate the conditional access of Lot B to align with the opposing access point and provide an efficient access to both Lots A and B. The consolidation of site-access driveways for Lots A and B will not only reduce the number of driveways accessing the roadway, but will also eliminate the conflicting left-turn movements the roadway by the alignment with the opposing access point. 4 REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT D—The redevelopment of Lot D will be handled in same manner as the redevelopment of Lot B (see Step 2) REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT C—The redevelopment of Lot C will be reviewed once again to ensure that the site will accommodate crossover and/or consolidated access. Using the crossover agreements with Lots B and D, Lot C would share a consolidated access point with 5 Lot D and will also have the shared site-access driveway of Lots A and B as an alternative frontage access. By using the crossover agreement and conditional access permit process, the city are able to eliminate another access point and provide the alignment with the opposing access points. COMPLETE—After Lots A, B, C, and D redevelop over time, the number of access points will 6 be reduced and aligned, and the remaining access points will meet the access spacing standard. Figure 5 illustrates the recommended access management plan applied to Road 68 (without implementation of shared access between private properties, which would enhance circulation and connectivity). 40 Road 68 Corridor Plan Figure 5 Road 68 Recommended Access Management Plan (refer to Attachment 3 for enlarged detail map) Recommended Access Management Plan Limited Left-in/Right-in/Right-out Only Between Signals i aaaaaaaaaaaa E------� iT D6FDB PKWY J_ IT- fit•------•> 1 •fir: --- - r-_ s� lot +fir LEGEND — 1r WRGLEYDB ---- ' - fr=r W Agbt-VRIghbUUr Driveway �'1 n EK aanp TrafPC Slgnal . _ FuNre TraHc Rlpnel .- Leif Tum All—d r I Jf ` - `- _—•�'" ' , r 111 <---� F c c acu'ry Neees MOn�Or FmVre OUauee • (May Block 111h development) u ]l •{ 'T [ BURDEN BLVD — r— 't"'�r fir' I" �^ _. — as r--' 41 Road 68 Corridor Plan Conclusion The recommended improvement projects presented in this report represent the culmination of several months of planning and refinement. Circumstance and needs will evolve over time as the City and the greater region grows. Care should be taken to ensure that the projects and needs identified through this corridor study effort are integrated in the City's upcoming citywide Transportation Plan development as well as with on-going and future BFCOG planning efforts. Refinements to the plan should be made as needed. 42 ATTACHMENTS TO: City Council FROM: Gary SUBJECT: Capital Imp I. REFERENCE(S): AGENDA REPORT Manager July 3, 2012 Workshop Mtg.: 7/9/12 1. Proposed Capital Improvement Plan 2013 -2018 (Council packets only; copy available for review in the City Manager's office, Pasco Library and on the city's website at http: / /wviw.pasco- wa.gov /citycouncilreports). II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 7/9: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS: A) The city spends several million dollars annually on a wide variety of capital expenditures necessary to deliver or improve municipal services to its citizenry. Those capital expenditures range from parks, streets and utilities to buildings, fire engines and computers. B) Some of the capital improvement projects require debt financing. Given the constraints on operating revenues, it is important to properly plan for additional debt service obligations. Development of a six -year Capital Improvement Plan, which identifies the various capital projects expected to be undertaken each year and the method of financing for each, is essential to effective financial planning for the city. It is also beneficial to the general public, which can reasonably anticipate when certain improvements are expected to occur. C) Development of the annual Capital Improvement Plan occurs as a prelude to the annual budget; the first year of the approved Capital Improvement Plan is then incorporated into the subsequent annual budget document. Thus, review and discussion of the Capital Improvement Plan should be carried out with the notion that the conclusions reached represent guidance to staff in developing next year's budget. V. DISCUSSION: A) Staff will be prepared to answer questions about any of the projects included in the proposed Capital Improvement Plan at the Workshop. It is recommended that Council gain a thorough understanding of the document through discussion at the Workshop. Staff expects Council to take formal action approving the Capital Improvement Plan by August so that it can be used to develop the 2013 fiscal year budget during September /October. 4(d) • • i r � CITY OF PASCO CA PI TA IMPRO VEMENTS PLAN 2013 to 2018 Approved , 2012 Resolution No. CITY OF PASCO 2013 - 2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 I. Introduction Definition and Purpose of Capital Improvements Plans ___________________________________________________________ 2 CIP Project Considerations _________________________________________ _________ ________ Why Plan for Capital Facilities -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 II. Fiscal Policies 1. Financial Feasibility -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 2. Financial Responsibility ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 3. Financing and Debt -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 4. Operating and Maintenance Costs --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 5. Revenues Requiring Referendum ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 6. Uncommitted Revenues 7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- III. Capital Improvement Projects Capital Project Detail Discussion--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 CIP Costs Summary 2012—2018 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 CIP Revenue Source Summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Individual Project Sheets ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 "Each of us is carving a stone, erecting a column, or cutting a piece of stained glass in the construction of something much bigger than ourselves." Adrienne Clarkson City of . Washington EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) supports the City of Pasco's comprehensive plan. Capital and major improvements usually have very long useful lives, significant costs, and are generally not mobile. The definition of "Capital Improvement Projects" is provided in the Introductory Section of this CIP. CONTENTS The Capital Improvements Plan(CIP) is presented in three sections: I. Introduction: Purpose, benefits, and methodology of the CIP. II. Fiscal Policies: Statements of requirements and guidelines that are used to finance the CIP. III. Capital Improvement Projects: List of proposed capital projects, including description, project costs, revenues and timing; as well as future operating costs. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT COSTS The total cost of Capital Improvement Projects for 2013 —2018 is: Cost Project Type (Amounts in Thousands) General 15,835 Park& Recreational 3,514 Economic Development 720 Street Overlay 6,730 Street Construction 103,789 Water 12,447 Sewer 20,567 Process Water Reuse Facility 1,350 Stormwater 748 Irrigation 1,570 Grants, Studies, and Other Operating Projects 1,348 Total 168,618 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington I. INTRODUCTION DEFINITION AND PURPOSE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The CIP is a six year plan for capital and major improvements that support the City of Pasco's current and future population and economy. The following definitions are presented to distinguish between a capital improvements plan (CIP), Capital Projects Budget, and report of annual spending for capital projects. Types of capital to be included in the CIP are also listed in this section of the CIP. Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) The City's CIP is a long-range schedule of proposed public facilities, infrastructure and major projects which includes estimated costs and sources of funding over a six year period. The CIP is updated annually for the purpose of confirming and/or reorganizing projects on a priority basis, and to prepare the Capital Projects Budget. Capital project work of a like nature that occurs each year may be included as one project in this plan. Capital Projects Budget The City's Capital Projects Budget consists of a list of capital projects, together with amounts and sources of approved projects and creates continuing budget authority for the life of the project without regard to the year the spending occurs. This budget requires council's approval to add a new project or to increase the total approved cost of an existing project. This budget also communicates which projects are finished and closed. Capital project work of a like nature that occurs each year and listed together in the CIP may be included as separate projects in the Capital Projects Budget based on such factors as work location and construction start dates. Capital Project Budgets may include related project work that may not meet the accounting definition of "capital" but are directly related to the project. The Capital Projects Budget is contained as a section in the City's "Annual Operations & Capital Improvement Budget" document. Repair and maintenance work, though it may be significant in dollar amount, is included as part of the annual Operating Budget. The annual "slice" of the Capital Project Budget is also included in the annual Operating Budget. To present an overall view for the year, the annual Operating Budget shows the total budgeted resources and uses for the entire city for the year (including combined annual and continuing authority items). The City's annual Operating Budget is contained as a section in the City's "Annual Operations & Capital Improvement Budget" document. Capital Improvement Projects Capital Improvement Projects are major, non-recurring expenditures for land, facilities, equipment, or infrastructure with a useful life of five (5) years or more, and a minimum cost of $50,000. Capital expenditures that do not meet the criteria stated above and not included in this document are also included in the capital outlay section of the City's annual Operating Budget. Specific types of Capital Improvement Projects may include one or more of the following: a. Land acquisition for a public purpose; Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington b. Construction of a new facility, such as a public building, ball field, water treatment plant; or expansion of such a facility; C. Construction relating to the addition or replacement of infrastructure (such as pipes, streets, etc.) d. A non-recurring rehabilitation, or major repair of all or part of a building, its grounds, facility, or major equipment; e. Purchase of major equipment; and f. Planning and feasibility studies. CIP PROJECT CONSIDERATION FACTORS 1. Public Safety. The project must identify a clear and immediate safety risk. Requests from departments, which deal principally with public safety, such as Fire and Police, do not automatically meet this standard. Another department, such as Parks and Recreation, could have a project that addresses a clear and immediate safety issue. 2. Public Health. Benefit to the environment and public health is a primary consideration. This consideration is only used when public health is a critical factor; a matter of necessity, rather than a matter of choice. For example all water or sewer projects concern public health; however, this consideration would be used only when urgent. Continual health hazards, however, would make a water or sewer project virtually mandatory. 3. Legal Requirement. Many federal and state grants are contingent upon local participation, and such intergovernmental agreements require legal compliance. Court orders and judgments (e.g., annexation, property owner rights, environmental protection), also represent legal requirements which may affect a CIP project. Consideration must be given to both existing legal requirements (e.g., federal/state stipulation that earmarked funds must be spent by a certain date), and anticipated legal requirements (e.g., pending annexation which is expected to be approved by the end of the year). 4, Related Projects. CIP projects in one category are essential to the success of projects in other categories. In some instances, a street should not be developed until a storm drain has been completed. Obviously, park development cannot proceed until park land has been acquired, but the development may also depend upon the completion of a street project to provide access to the park. In addition, significant federal or state grants might be involved, and the City would be required to provide its matching share or forfeit the grant. Related projects by other agencies may affect a saving which should be pursued. 4. Consistency with Current Master Plan. A master plan for a specific category of public facilities has long-term objectives set during the planning process. City departments have an obligation to request CIP projects that support and Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington implement the stated goals and objectives of the master plan. Consideration should not be given here to any project that does nothing to actively implement the plan, or adversely affects the plan. 5. Net Impact on Future Operating Budgets. The substantial cost impact of a proposed CIP project on future operating budgets of the City is an important factor in the City's decision to construct the project. In some cases, however, a project may generate enough revenue to offset, or even exceed, future operating costs (e.g., water or sewer treatment plant, stadium, airport, etc.). 6. Other. There are additional priority factors that departments may include for evaluation. Some of these additional factors for consideration could include public support, level of service, cost savings to the City, and impact on economic development. WHY PLAN FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS? There are at least three reasons to plan for capital projects: (1) good fiscal management, (2) managing growth, and(3) eligibility for grants and loans. 1. Good Fiscal Management Planning for major capital projects and their costs enables City of Pasco to: • Demonstrate the need for facilities and identifying how to pay for them; • Estimate future operations/maintenance costs of new facilities that will impact the annual budget; • Take advantage of various sources of revenue (i.e., available grants and low interest loans, etc.) that may require a CIP in order to qualify for the revenue; and • Receive better ratings on bond issues when the City borrows money for capital (reducing interest rates and the cost of borrowing that money). 2. Managing Growth Capital Improvement Plans are necessary in the comprehensive plan in order to: • Provide capital for land development that is envisioned or authorized by the land use element of the comprehensive plan; • Maintain the quality of life for existing and future development by establishing and maintaining standards for the levels of service of capital and facilities; • Coordinate and provide consistency among the many plans for capital and improvements, including: Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington • Other elements of the comprehensive plan(i.e., transportation and utilities elements), • Master plans and other studies of the local government, • Plans for capital and facilities of state and/or regional significance, • Plans of other adjacent local governments, and • Plans of special districts. • Ensure the timely provision of adequate facilities to support existing populations and future development; • Document all capital projects and their financing (including projects to be financed by impact fees and/or real estate excise taxes that are authorized by the State of Washington Growth Management Act(GMA)). The CIP is the element that makes the rest of the comprehensive plan "real". In reality, the CIP determines the quality of life in the community. 3. Eligibility for Grants and Loans The State of Washington Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development's Public Works Trust Fund requires that local governments have some type of CIP in order to be eligible for grants and loans. Some other grants and loans have similar requirements (i.e. Interagency for Outdoor Recreation), or give preference to governments that have a CIP. II. FISCAL POLICIES Fiscal Policies Goal Provide needed public facilities that are within the ability of the City to fund the facilities, or within the City's authority to require others to provide the facilities. Policy 1.0: Financial Feasibility. The estimated costs of all needed capital improvements shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the City pursuant to current statutes, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Conservative estimates need not be the most pessimistic estimate, but cannot exceed the most likely estimate. Revenues for Capital Improvement Projects must be "financial commitments," which shall be sufficiently assured to be bankable or bondable by the City. Policy 2.0: Financial Responsibility. Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed capital improvements. 2.1 Existing development. 2.La: Existing development shall pay for the capital and improvements that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington and may pay a portion of the cost of capital and improvements needed by future development. 2.Lb: Existing development's payments may take the form of user fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. 2.2 Future development 2.2.a: Future development shall pay its fair share of the capital and improvements needed to address the impact of such development. Upon completion of construction, "future" development becomes "existing" development, and shall contribute to paying the costs of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities as described in Policy 21a, above. 2.2.b: Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, capacity fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, public/private partnerships, voluntary funding agreements, and future payments of user fees, charges for services special assessments and taxes. Future development shall not pay impact fees for the portion of any public facility that reduces or eliminates existing deficiencies. 2.2.c: Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 3.0: Financing and Debt. Capital and improvements shall be financed, and debt shall be managed as follows: 3.1 Capital and improvements financed by City utility funds shall be financed by: 3.1.a: Debt to be repaid by user fees and charges and/or connection or capacity fees for utility facilities and services, or 3.Lb: Current assets (i.e., reserves, equity or surpluses, and current revenue, including grants, loans, donations and inter-local agreements), or 3.1.c: A combination of debt and current assets. 3.2 The net income of City utility funds shall be at least equal to the annual cost of the following: (a) principal reductions of outstanding bonds; (b) loan requirements to Federal or State agencies; (c) annual operating reserve increases; and (d) bond coverage requirements per bond covenants. 3.3 Fees and charges for utility funds shall be established and maintained at a level sufficient: 3.3.a: To pay the net income requirement in each fiscal year, as described in Policy 3.2 above; 3.3.b: To pay the full cost of operation, and maintain the utility in good repair and working order; Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 3.3.c: To provide an operating reserve equal to 15% of budgeted operating expenditures; and 3.3.d: To provide a future capital and improvements reserve in an amount equal to the average annual cost (excluding debt financing) of the approved six year capital and improvement program, considering any changes which, from time to time, may be made in such program. 3.4 Leveled rate increases are preferred for City utility funds, and when possible, should be achieved through leveled expenditures. 3.5 Capital and improvements financed by nonutility funds shall be financed from either current assets: (i.e., current revenue, fund equity and reserves), or debt, or a combination thereof. Financing decisions shall include consideration for which funding sources (current assets, debt, or both) will be; a) most cost effective, b) consistent with prudent asset and liability management, c) appropriate to the useful life of the project(s) to be financed, and d) the most efficient use of the City's ability to borrow funds. Policy 4.0: Operating and Maintenance Costs. The City shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the City or other provider is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of the facility. Policy 5.0: Revenues Requiring Referendum. In the event that sources of revenue listed under "Projected Costs and Revenues" require voter approval in a local referendum that has not been held, and a referendum is not held, or is held and is not successful, this Capital and improvements Program (CIP) shall be revised at the next annual amendment to adjust for the lack of such revenues, in any of the following ways: 5.1 Increase the use of other sources of revenue; 5.2 Decrease the cost, and therefore the quality, of some types of public facilities, while retaining the quantity of the facilities that is required to provide the appropriate level of service. 5.3 Decrease the demand for and subsequent use of capital and facilities; 5.4 A combination of the above alternatives. Policy 6.0: Uncommitted Revenue. All development permits issued by the City which require capital improvements that will be financed by sources of revenue which have not been approved or implemented (such as future debt requiring referenda) shall be conditioned on the approval or implementation of the indicated revenue sources, or the substitution of a comparable amount of revenue from existing sources. Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington III. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Section III of the CIP presents Capital Improvement Projects, and the financing required to pay for those projects. Each project type listed in the executive summary is described in this section of the CIP. CIP Proiect Detail Sheet Project Description Each proposed capital and improvement project for each of the eight types of public facilities is described on the CIP Project Form. Each improvement project is named, and briefly described. First, the CIP Project Form specifies the Project's name, description, and organization responsibility. Project Justification. Second, the CIP Project Form includes a justification and/or benefits explanation for each project, which summarizes the results of the project ranking process described in the Introduction of this CIP. The information obtained from the project ranking system is used to prioritize and assist in determining which projects would be recommended for inclusion in the 2013 - 2018 CIP. Project Costs. Third, each CIP project's covering the next six fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars ($1,000). All cost data is in current dollars; no inflation factor has been applied because the costs will be revised as part of the annual review and update of the CIP. Each capital and improvements project was prepared by the department providing the public facility. Project Funding. Fourth, specific sources and amounts of revenue are shown for each of the next six fiscal years, which will be used to pay for the proposed Capital Improvement Project. The forecasts of existing revenue and expenditures are provided to (1) determine the City's overall financial position, and (2) identify existing and proposed new City of Pasco revenue that can be used for future projects. One of the most important requirements of the Capital Improvements Plan is that it must be financially feasible. This means it must include a balanced budget, which clearly identifies sources of public money for all projects. In keeping with these requirements, the City's fiscal policies described in Section II of this CIP require conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the City pursuant to current statutes and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Operating Budget Impact. Finally, the CIP Project Form also shows each CIP project's annual operating budget impact for each of the next six fiscal years following completion of the project. All estimated future operating costs are also shown in current thousands of dollars ($ 1,000). Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington � tl ti U 00 ON O b N N O C) O p0 p0 � O i i i X 0 0 � i i i i � i • O 00 O 000 N M 00 N 00 � p O p 0 0 kn kn 00 O O M M N M N N N N ) N N ri M IM t� V N N N U O V kn o kn kn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 kn v W) o 0 0 0 0 O 01 V' O C1 M kn r- V) O O Cq O M --i ry N eA N M y kn mr-� 00 M N N A M N N in en U EO t ,•, F z a z 0 �r ,.� > O a rn aoi W A JO Cn ct U U U O U U cd m cd CC Q Q' y � •� � Q O O „W, o 0 b-0 M M n Q1 M M rCN M M n C1 in OA N N N N M M M M M '7 7 7 R 'T M M 1n 1n kn Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 0 0 I kn o 0 0 � o 0 0 s. 00 00 V) O 000 � V) N — — — i p i i p i i i i i i 0 0 0 i i i i i i O O O i i i i i i i i p i i i i 00 M 00 i i i i i i i i p i i i i i i O O b oo � oo N l0 O kq 00 � � N i i i O O O O 00 00 00 OOo N 0po 00 In � N O Oc C O M kn Vn M 00 --� --� --� i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i p i i i i i i i 00 i U M N k � N a � N 5 H � F=1 C C Z O U 0 Cl 0 0 0 "° M l— OO 0 0 v'1 0 0 0 0 0 0 a kn O O 00 �O kn kn 00 Vl 0\ N 00 01 N O N O M 01 M O �O kn kn 01 01 01 0\ \O O ICI \° k 00 V) 't 00 "C N N r- M M rj M O 00 l— Vn N U � � y C1 a Z ° OC. - > Z >b W x orn O ° ~ Y N C) W MO 00 Cn 10 •'� ��, bA N O O O❑ N CX 00 cl� C1 al 0 ' � 3 � � � d a� w o � �° U > o > � a O CG�3 v3 d U �3 d 00 . 0 . p a� O 3 0 0 r� O d a, d 3 � x � -u u'A � U � M � � � a°' � l a s kn r- 0� -0 M kn t- *1 M i n 0\ kn n 01 ti M kn r ON l- L— 00 00 00 00 00 as 01 01 0\ 01 Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 1 City of . Washington i p0 p p0 p N i i i i i i i i i O 0 l) N O O ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ,'n-� O N .in- oc M in N O ' ' ' M N `O N kn G O O N � v'� O � kn n N Ln oO � O O O O C OO ' In e1j Ln Ln p r3 ti O M N N N zz: M O b M p p a � N O U O O O O kn O O 0 0 0 r- O N N �c N O O O O rt N O O O vl O �O kn O O N 01 kn n O (= O C oo l- C71 v) � O y �O "O 0 0 kn N N ,-y ,-y M �c Ln 0o O Vl M �G ~ O N U y ¢1 C%] N N r r- N y k a O 00 N O w w cG o �// on = w Q a U 7C U C ¢ ° o w a O yC bOA a m r cd O N � K •F', 3 Un 4-a k r' M 2 O ^vyi O P-i N ¢' Ip a 4 C"" — aa+." N O N 'm 'm Y rj p 4� E •� c�i c�i c�i a W U 'm Y � —M S g .5 04 cG U P O ct �"' LO+ L� Y O m +-+ Y .0+ Y N 00 00 ao u ¢ N3 UwN333 ¢ N3u33wa33 rl M V) l- ON rl M in h O1 ro M V) .- O1 kn n 01 V) t- O\ �--i N N N N N M M M M M IV IV IV IV IV V) V) V) kn M `O � 1�0 14 r- Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington 00 kn N kn N 14) 00 kn In 1r)i i i 00 00 i i i O p O 00 O b i N i i i 00 p0 i i i 00 i i N p i p i C p If) Ln In In ts kn � H H Mi i pct p0 p p i i O O O p0 p0 Op vpi �Y N N N N 1 N M � p C, C) i i i O O O O p O kn S r O 10 N M N ) N N r, .-, .•r M O .. O N 10 N o ooc o o ° ° °o kn cot F z: w � � U H d Q N O U oo t, v, 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 vi o M 00 0 r- o0 to M O N O kn kn (= `0 v) � O .--� v) 00 7 'tt ry,�t In wn ci In kn N n M M oc m r N C C C C O O O O L S.i i0i L Z u u Z ° a uM o z 0 C3 9•� U � o � a� � � � � b � �. � v1 W a Q Q F 3 W Q Z o �' z � � b � � � ww '� �. =° w 3 •° � 3 ° Z d d CA'UX u M u CX 0. O d Q-4 u d M kn r CN H M kn n 01 rl MW� n 01 H M kn r � r r r r o0 00 00 00 0o a a\ a\ a a\ 0 0 0 0 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington N C 01 O N N C In Z � b N � � O 7 x o N x o^ N N kn O o O n 000 O O O O O r, V) rl O In cu 1r, M O N ^Qn o o v a a � N Fzl � F Cj a O o x o0 s z � O �4 O `" dam x a U U ; p Q 00 a U U d Oc o ' F F N N N N N N N N N Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington iz � � o 0 0 0 1 0 � N p O p N N N � � O N M N rn M M M to to i i i i i i i i i i i i i M i O ' O O i . i to M M --� � N O OO i . i . i i i . i i i i i i i i i ry 00 O O O C ,n in `nr in U O d F-i •--� kn to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to O O O "p M rT 1:t O O �t Cl to 0 to O O W) O M to lc O to N N N O O to O O to to r 00 00 to M M rn ZJ U3 U � w }•1 fr �i V] Q ct O _ w w 9b C13 O a a3 E U >~ d bA x64 > ° b ° a M O ox � � U a � 3 0 O � zj � 0 � � Z 3 N o -o d d v O a� 3 wc4a! Uwv5pavJ u; Oda, � a� r� � � �-. w r .. ON to M O\ r- M a ON en 4t �--i N N '� M '� 1-4 N ti -4 �--1 r r OMO � � � � � rl N H N N N N N •.•I .� H N N '� ^� Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington � tl ti IN C, ° (711 o 0 N o N o o N �O M p •-- O � � � N O M N � F Z w') N o � 0 00 0 �c In O o 0 � o 0 0 "0 �n o M N O V N N O In C N N 00 O "T N O N O �' C) N M N r'-[ b4 O M 0-0 +� U U U iU.i U r.+ GTr u u 0) 000 cd H .^i �' M id F DO w ° o ' vu W as x° 0 ou O x .� d �F Q� � a � � � � •� ^RO c`i/'� o F�o oN'n p CO o h 1 r ob 0 o a3 ° o g o C4 d o ; X23 a > �0 0 w d ;b ��o � o a o � � o �R" d oa: max " .° o v � 3 v o � c4 p. 3 X23 •� � 3 � � � � ° U � ¢ U � o � � " Q a o � d a3 � � � � Ow' r� UdwC8v� v� Cgv� r� ax 04 5 u u r4dv� v� M M V1 -4 � � N � O M O �--� -4 '-M ti V1 n O N .ti N N Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington z o DO 00 N — ry � O O Oc O C C 00 CIA 0 0 p v 7 r-, o 0 0o o CIA r o N o o0 a lz� o L h 00 N p O N N oo M p o 0 0 0 0 0c o r- � p p N cv O pOp � -t "V � tl ti C U Q Q N Z 00000 o 0000w a, oogoov r- 0 �] N �--� O h V O 00 N h h ,.y h r- O 00 ,--� 00 N '-' pp M ,--i N N ON ci i o � a b 14 b A I b b W a o b, -'4 a w x a 04 o d u o U u u > OM. Hill CIO d en F T o dda. a: UUOW U 0.! dv°� a a; Uv°� F- a Ui4 a kn kn N o0 00 ry 01 M N !Y N M 7 7 7 7 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington v, Ln O o0 s 00 - °O o V) N O p p p e o n In r N 09 y 00 in In In N Ln M N 'T ti ar L� N V, 00 b 04 oo oo r r r N p � O O N x O In V� 001 O 000 00 0 a V') kn rl R M N t` N N �L N i M e-i W N ^ N oo 'Z3 N A N W C C) U o r o T U rDr� Iti 0 0 0 �n �p O O 01 O O 00 N O O O N N I.O A N N 'n 00 kn Vl to N 01 N N O 1.0 O O M to O O M N 01 kn 00 � r- 01 O n r O r M M N •--� r r r N 01 \O --� --� Vl N --� --� 00 M O kn M N w (1) k 0" °' C° '� •° v U o Cd c> O O G, c� �-�' a) k a' u .' � .o '-� "T - 0 p o u u On u 00 U LL aaq b °� O v w P. ¢ rxC° � � a 33 � ¢ NIu a ° 33333w ¢ Pa333 eh kn kn r a � In r a M kn M r 0� .� M kn kn kn N M 7 M in M M M kn N N [- [- Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 4, 00 O ry. O In 00 N N � O N O O i i i p t� v� N n O N N kn � tl ti p0 p0 00 kr) e4 in «, C N p �c Z i h N Ln N N N 4', N N kn M O Ln C) p� `n O I i i i i O v', tr, 00 rn a 00 v1 i i i kn T 00 O rl 00 O Vl V1 b U ca N N N tn ti ~ O V U �OQ � qN O N vri O � O O 00 O c� �, C0 — 0 0 00 O O N ba M �Y M Ln V') (�]. kn d' O M kn 1,3 .5 � , y v � 'm �, � F v � v W °� •° � � v a, o a� a� ° ° y � •° � ° HU � � Uw e � F a W� a � w a7z �,,, vi via � •� ax � � .� °' W � dQv� i� r� v) UPaU05 py iw un � war4U � 3w t10 r, rn v� r a -a M vn a a .-, M vn r a k 00 00 00 N r 00 00 O� O� 01 l� N 01 N O O O O O N Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 ' ' ' ' l0 0000 00 N — Oc kn O i i i i i i r i i i i p i l� O 00 Z3 N vi N 00 i . i i i i vii t b O N O N ' O p i i i i i i l� pM O O O 0 O � i i i i i i i i i i i M O O 00 00 i i Z.1 ~O r m Dc r Nt � ti M In C Q rrA 4 N O v'� in O Oo O 0� \O wn N 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 M O OO ,�-i � 00 �--� N O 00 to N T � — � 'n O — O �.-. BOO ,�. 00 w) O O O N 'c v) rP �--� '� �O V) O� �O M O1 01 N M 00 7 N �+ �--� v, N kn kn N o0 M �bq M - p kC o0 U � o L7 q � U v a x oo U v N Ln oN0 x Cn to SU• 0- aa)i 0 M to p °�' 00 '0 - x M d H y d M a� ao 3 2. � off •' •- � `� N o X33 ` 0 � 3 bo o > U x Mx b d o aUi w g� a�i 00 00 Wl bOq N b sU. d N Py C cl A a) o t� QO i •-' O b to as - 00 0 N i a y U U cC ti U wi U VQi 04 H o n U d V] Ri U � �Z. i ] C � W U %) r .-y ti r ti M M kn -1 Kn r 01 M in r V1 r- M -, M r to �O O N N N r r N o0 0o M 'IT r N 0� Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington z o o Oc oc rY Cv r, c Z3 b O 0C N N i O p O i i i i i i i i i i V) O 00 M O �o v r kn r a in 14) N M N Or 00 kn r^ O tl M Q O O O O kn O kn I Irl V) O bo O kn N kn O O H N M oo �O V 01 M N •-� 00 00 qo M j x vi rz U rz Z o o n .r o kn o 0 0 Vn o kn o o vi o n o x C) ,n r 0 00 0 kn N kn o 0 0 1�t r v 0, o r o0 \c M M M N r 00 r N O �..� U p d ti � u z ° ;~ A o ti °' C7 N a CG Y w a F > h o 3 al ° W 0 C1r 5 Uj pr �1 cd cYi a 0O H V P� Ey rn b0 .� > r ° ° o > d a, Y 8.° 3 b P. a� Cz Cu Y w m a x P. A Q N N 4 0 U W a w a! Z � r vn r r r. M - r M a oN r M M d' O oo M M t r 1f1 l0 � � N r Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington i. 00 C, M O O O kn M O O r _ 00 x 01 00 N O V) M 00 M O h O O yN ri V) M �. kn N M rti N � v, x kn a, kn x ti I 00 U d q N b4 l� 00 O� 00 N x r—� � � •--� CO M � 0. I� U z o w � Q > � Ww w O Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington IRV 9 w i i ��lllLilLl ` Ld LU `- IPI■■■■61■■■■■�u I�■■■■ l■■■■■■!� ■■■■■ 11!■■■■rt' AM 3AV HIS ■■■■■ r■■■■■■� I�■■■■■■■■■■■■ ` it ■■■■■■■■■■`7� r.■■■■■■■■■■!�■ - k V� .� � • 1 1 22 City of . Washington 00 Z 00 OC cd F.7' N bA N O O cq Z3 ti ti � a o U a y M M O � •- „ ro O 1 p 3 o cq m Z2 zz o v M C, U y V b b r O Uz Q - u �, A lu w o ti � O o _ a, AaUO � raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco, Washington z LU LU ui W J z z LL Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington CIO U w y y O p � bD U y 7 y ti n y •v ti p 0 OR p � U V O A • v O O C N a3 ° 7� 6g , bA .i 'b � m � 'J•i ry � � N N O � v a U Q on ti QW U �. O 0.pi Q d N oM, h rn h A A O U N N QI H l^^FS"C yyy U n7 v + O 4 O E v N v N ° x 5 p v w w ti U 5 U U U ti W m ti N U � vl N 00 l� O\ N — M in N c0 �O U a`i d a°i R o y b U O v lu is - � a ao q o CO b9 U • a 2s w �' •o c4 a �D o i U O ux A. v� W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington w w I Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington o m 00 m Uaa tl CT UJ � s. a y O U ,b b m O p � U V � U • ai U � U � M C y O O y Z: M ZZ OU ZS '6 tl U ti C N � ti 0 ►►W77 C -b �r U U y z o V Q Q N i Q N w° U G ba � CO U h d tl W Z lu U z aA lu • � U � U O ti w Y U y Q� O U - 9 «+ O Q = N N Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of Pasco,Washington 4 �!■■■■l ■■■■■■■■■■� ` ��!■■■■■w■w■■■ ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■EME■■■■■■■► S 7■t■�■■wt■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■I■■\ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■'■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■r -4 w■I■w■■■■■■w■w■■■■■■■■■■■■■w■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■k 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■L ■■■■■■■■■■■w■ww■■■■■■■■■■■■■■A ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■!■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■M■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■► 1■■■■■■■■■■■■■■w■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ 7■■■■■■■■■I■■■m■m■■mm■■■■■■■■! ■■■■■■■■■■■■■'v■1■■■■■!■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■mall■■■■�""` ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i'■■�� ■■■■■■■■■■■■■R■ 4, ■■mom■�� , ■ ■ �f ..• J�i IIAA City of . Washington 43 s 00 00 00 cd I M1 • � o a o c o T w b b b 1z O ti ti O U dq y op y O 3 • U 'd A k U Q tl U Q U cz, N ,.� 3.1 N O O U O Fr1 ��•+j C/� O O � O � 01 O � N O Ln ow U � U rd, ti U w ti Cn .� O O U � � •O O O - O C7 m U E•••� o. °m Q � U Oa � 5 U d O ti N o _ -o y wAaUO Ca caw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington uj uj U) I� r uj 0 W z LU T Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington T� oc 00 � p U � � O N � b4 P U iy N wb ZZ b b u 'u W h 'u- O~ O O O w 'C ,d N N N � .� '�O N sN. U � � d' � � d' • R w 3 U � • N T N C M M M zt �7 Fit ,Q 43 .p c3� yN, 41 O 4 E! a Q ti a Q ti w U O iU-i U � id 48 Au G b U O U �Q ti • � Y � b4 W z 0 g "cJ U a A a U 0 U w w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington �w r .• • • � 1 1 32 City of , Washington 2 E j ) » » � & R & \ RI & \ ) 2 \ Z3 \ 01 / § _ ( % $ f > .■ \ - \ \ = 2 & & % § ƒ _ \ 1 _ \ } g ƒ 3 \ % \ \ 2 \ J of e E \ 2 \ ] \ \ j { E ° ° A \ \ o ® n . t $ - f } \ / \ ƒ 2 2 2 s § ) A = Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 City of . Washington J N w CL LU Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington j & \ j § % \ j ) j § r . \ \ _ \ _ . / IS j \ % 2 7 \ R \ . \ 0 - / ) » ` ~ > rq > f 0- \ \ A \ ¢ � i u w 2 ® 2 2 f \ \ ( / o / / / \ / ~ / u \ � 5 Ij u � G — ] 7 k 5 & / ° /t k k % ) f q « Rm Rq \ \ 4 ® \ 2 \ ] \ ) C / - _ ° / - $ \ D - \ / \ � \ _. u3 u 2 Pm Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2!R City of Pasco,Washington p � 1 �. 41 , _s. • E: �� - jam- + j .� � • � 1 1 36 City of . Washington 00 CC bA w O U vi L7 G. vi U p O � y � O 7 8 c'3 3 cd � O — O a I-- � lzt R. I•Q�' � w � U a � o o t b U � � 0.1 _ s o ti � O w � 0 a A a U 0 a w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 0 4r U 0 O LU OL Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington § § \ \ \ \ \ « 2 & § ƒ § � % & \ : k j R 2 \ ( \ . § & � k ~ ) 1 ƒ j § \ ƒ ¢ § \ Q & \ 2 & � � * / § \ q — / 6b 4 _ ) � E - ` \ Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013-2018 City of . Washington rt r LL LU U) r z Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of Pasco,Washington -o N C •� W O O N b It b Z3 Z4 C3 ti ti 2 uO„ `Y r-4 O r\j 0.' '�' O O CJ U � � U P &d w d Z3 b b b 13 'rV O O 'A .d O ca O , O 3 oo h m in a � Pr JJc,� U v rY 'JV O fY 'rte N N M o o o o — o 0 0 ?� �o T Y m _ v o n -o d • 1 o m o 0 � U � ',•� � Ox � rti ry � rti N N f3, O d O C4 j ti p cd •� � M C � M M u M C, B O O O I-a ^ Cd 0 Cd Q F ' cu B � U U 00 b a .4 loco Y q o o00 0 Ln "6 O h h U o o Cn CC4 Ln Cd a to q o U � U Gl � U N � O • y y _ o 2 'O A C7 A o d GG ae U aAaUO QaUzn rxw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington CL t a } 7 r 1 i _ Ov LU Af? IL CLe � Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington x 72 a a N o � 3 3 � � a O M V� A �. ry Q, N OO n 0 N � O � � � N P, co IU JA O y 's�J Oa cd N U C3 ti O ti a u O W N p O C� 4, 7. a" UN N Q h �y O U O U V •J 000 - �. N M cd zt Ln O N Q �•' m Q a � A U � U • z ti O ti � � N o � •� �yyr V � O v� `q N Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington � s J nr Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington U 7J U U W Z W CO O p O d • N - U O _13 ti 'r ti O O 3 y N FL" p W 5 •� a b L�. � � ti � � ti ti U O p O — � O U m y N O O O �,S N _ N ti 1 W 1 N 4. Cd LL O UG+" U ZZ ti ti ti $ 3 U � N y U cCd W O EO EO O U W „C a �•, d w H 'E 4 w U aQi � s U � 0.l � � U O ti N � w Q� O � _ U v� x Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington s — ■ • I i2a....ii .0............••• .• ' AA! ��........• r. 11!11 !! 12■ w...i w!2! A 62!1 6222 tt r2l1 1 r212 nisi � 1611■ "�, j �#, 2r1.■ jL i6ia:. *F 4 s y A; N' ` 4 6 • 3.. •ri< i .a 0 {�` A .4 .•f 46 City of , Washington % & \ % 7 \ § \ m a _ - j ) � . _ § % \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ . ¥ % \ m Q � 7 § E § wo u _ § % \ � � \ If) \ \ 4 ® \ 2 { ƒ tl k S ] \ = j � / k / w 4.> f / § - ` Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2!R City of . Washington Irq , Y Aif 4a ,r F_ L { r° Jf LD 0 E wti � �. { f V l Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 00 00 'ab 0 N N C ti tl � ti ti bA p ry ry O rA '�a O C �N, U h Z2 h ti ti GL � S� F'n• ti N ~ ti N ~ ` ~ O Y � N O ° ,ro, ti 14) ed 14) qN U L% N N U O C3 u Z �cz Q U o � Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of Pasco,Washington 4 r M IWO r ' try• �r � 4 15ia�t r lyM City of Pasco,Washington 1 00 00 ° 0 U 7.5 .Y. it O z � N N - U b Z b CZ N N a N N O b O O h m Q N ^p gyp` M M cCi O ti O O ti U o A 78 � U ti ti w U O tOr U O j H � U b p � aoi •° W U z aA � U Y ca � o P. P. ?''r W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington r t Nl(100 tUlWJIJ I S 4 � W i g f4d I .} II T a 1 ! I N� Y ti + i 1 d 4a ' 1 1±SV'SS I �M i 2 i Y 1 i.11 I "'I-1 1 4 f - � .. t- X6,1 .' .. Lle.. 4 4-+.,,L C. � L i �,• bv., .'d L� LL r • y�0 `It f +F i• .. r s. r - �s Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington o 0 0 _ O � N O � � C Q U o � p� ;t q- ti ti O .U. .4 3 ° A °o U U U UO IS C ti O -d tea ° � o U U � S C It It � a U � � � bq �. O T bQ tl by � •,��- U oq �o Q O P. bA Q O U oa w �1aU0 U65 aw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington IZ- q O c6 n i 0 �U x w - i Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington 6 § 00 / ) CC 00 § 0 ) % \ — � \ \ a \ \ & & \ § / \ � \ � Z3 E \ � 2 2 U ? $ a \ » ® \ < 2 \ 2 ) § ƒ \ 2 2 � \ / � \ / � \ ƒ 5 2 \ \ 4 ~ j / k o � / \ \ \ \ 0 ) w Z S ] a \ \ } ) ƒ / / 4 u c = \ w Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington JA City of . Washington C) _ 00 00 � W O d9 cz 000 00 o o cs U p (Y rti•i N � rti ON N R 3 0 o CD _ o _ b o c� • 1�j 00 ;0,E Y �r � � d. � v 0 0 � � U tl ti ti 7 U U Yom, � p, N � •� C2 M � C2 M .2 H R Q ti fti Q ti lu CD U Q U O In N M T O � •� b 0. t y • O kn m ' m 0 C a V) Vz cz S u Q U � U t� U tl 14) • lu lu w � d O Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington moo w ■ City of . Washington O O U N N 00 U C QO O lu F� m bA rq CD rq — O U ti G r 1z tl _ � U T O � � O w 7 • O — O — w j tl C ti 0 ti ff ti (Z' N N O � N O O � � O ti tl O ti ti � y y0 p � by ro rq Or 'd N ~ ' OOi ti ti A � � w U CD. O ' a d � � _ 48 - W O � ti V; V Y. O v � Q Q o U U Ca 10 � � U ti l lu ti o 0 w p a U 0 r w Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 • City of • Washington Ir Sy].;7J�'7l iii 4,• r It - 4 & rLUa�aa ry 71 +' iMa uj IAK i .. ■■ 1 r JJ 1 e T' - �- .� : W I1f of C - 1 �F a CID 4 0 to w 6 W 1- Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 .1 City of . Washington w, o^ o � N � o U py ti ti ry O cad c�C m 70 qq U O U Ci � U • Cq U C°.1 v � � 00 — Oc b w oo 'O O L"N Q Q A .� H C UO tj N z N V h rq a rq o 0 U o m v v ti lu lu 00 00 00 00 a Q N a q N U O M � � m U lu b a Z Q U � U � V U � p0 • � U ON ed LV U U Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington Lus W - - ! i Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington U o 00 00 � � o — cO U R+ U O O O C N N N T M O U N 3 ° rq Z3 ti C! � ti ti IU � U 8 � U A rq c" u � > 1z O .O a •v, O O O A. Q' N N Q 6N9O C O 0 — N z " M ,-. r � M vi "d Ci ti ti ti r7 da"i d Oq a v � o U yCC R', O q� d .v3� H o c`H nv �° Uy N 'z on N 7� '.4 N p o CIS Q N Q N 5n ° ° o°o N N v — U � O U U U C' O O� ;z O� ;t � o 4 1z O v1 V] pj U o ti o v un c+M P. Vim] O U S7 O y � Q O U � • by b4 � tlcc o � - aAaUOv� Q W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington AMMO- w4 LL4 , 4- ti C a. t- IL OL CDM L t I ... y 4 ? �L 9� LU 4q fill t Id r 4, r w 5�. •E .4 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 4 'Z s 00 x N a 'Jr N a N N c❑C ,� � U a 'rte N a 'rte O O Vi V T. A W q3 ra Cd V Z s. b Z b � b y Z� ti ti U 6 a N a N N n u ' 3 0 •o y o ° — ° 0 — In 'Nd ,b v a 'Jr N a ry N y N Q W C o d o^ o A E' SJ O U N s � N I ZI U F' t. O N N O O .. 14) ou °? ° N Wn 00 v O y v m a CIO U w° 8 v lu Z Q - a� You A o Ly 5 U Ln , ti N b-0 ` U - Y C - 0.� A a U O H a W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington / I t M1 'i ji I I Se ui •�ri •sew �I � ' _j ui fit j; 1 i �• i 'q �I Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 .. City of . Washington ��qq ti CIO IN � � w � o 3 � o I ti a� ti ti O a w ry w ry O 'CY °J IN �.4 O ell O oc p O a ti 1 o ° o o 0 c0 O U a ry a N N O Q U � G C) ti F b a N a o S o ° oo n o 0 oo -• S ID 72 2 .. o xo a ° Y 0 0 m O � N C H a t ZU ti Ct ti ~ C O .. a � M M N N I. O ID oa oo CO O 60'A Q+ O U 0 U � U � b y O U � lu 7� m Lei - -'d Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 u U - City of Pasco,Washington U I ' 4- u � v V Q Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 o - rn 00 00 17, T p v 00 z 00 00 rq N a N N . m U Cd 00 00 U U U 00 — 00 — U U 00 00 ;Cc) o U 00 Oc 0 Cd bi) a ate ° N N W U C13 y sL 3 a W pU Cd N '� ;� o v 'Z1 O 0 bA ry a ° N o y P O o — rq O > A N N U a o C1 — Z o r .� Cd u Q Q U U bA m q U NN — o o M � Q tom-. CS U O y«� A114 b a U U U � A � • U � U U l Y � L ~ � � • ono o ' lu A .� 78 U O U W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 •• City of . Washington 61 4. I +, !r f W • r :I 4 � .1 � _ a - Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 1 City of . Washington g 3 O N v O b b b N 'O 00 � o ti ti N N N N Ln O V E' N O O O O 00 O 00 In S U > O V N h ch R � cc 0 3 0 � � � � a° •o cn'.� rY � 0, V Q C C C C v1 ++ F U a Q N Q N N O O 0 0 en OO .--i �O m a 3 � U � V h V CnN O ti w 7C N O w w A � U O [E Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington lk pe xv t W t Is..r ■ a I �� t �' ^,46 ih .,i t , a� t ix IV —N tIy "r A _ + r d'� 7 _ l r-1 I� 3g �: y LU LL 4 W 3 1 r5 N t. Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington CO % 2 3 % \ & \ ; § \ & \ & 2 & \ Q> \ \ — $ @ @ — < u , . . . & . \ \ g / 1z j § \ > \ ¢ / , @ © w \ / 1 \ \ \ \ \ c $ a ; § Q m « k m 2 \ ) 3 2 2 � o / u � « tub toy \ / C) � / C) � \ \ { 00 � ) / u \ } \ ) \ ER \ § \ \ 0 { } t .( k u A \ � \ j ƒ) - & / / j u \ ± y ± A = Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 City of . Washington I i r � W s - - r . rY L - - - yLu � a� � .u4^r+r"4 9� S`i ti� 4a`�kl�.'" 1�3':F:" � � o� '�.0 4'+�y�• �i, 4 pq Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington b ti 00 00 y �14 0 4 o 0 rZj ° � w 00 Q �14 b CIS � � 00 C o0 o v IN b b b u 1z ti ti a+ FA 4L O O O N x 'S �N 0., C, N ° 0 3 a, o N N N ".. N �• Cq � U Cd Cz Cd O y OC C tl tl ti ti O bA � x a o rq Oc u O IN OC v v o •� .� N w ti � w � N p � O O � � 61 0 - U U O ti V� M y j vi U Z a (� N � a bOA A Oti � U - O � a A a Ul 0 w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington L o . i yl. a. k 4 � Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 0 00 'L 00 c0 'r H O � O U � wO w O O y w O ` N O O _ O . C4 CA cd ° 0. 1:t ^y IZ lu N b r0 o rY 0 0 o cz lu ti M, o � � It 0 ^G � O � Ln Ln V h cd M M C13 a Q Q y N cc O O N CO O O �O N r4 C-A U P, N O O b Cn M PO U U � � � U 5 � ti b�4 O y a, gaUO a xw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington a s s ° ' O ON il a � t, .a ry xFL i i 1, kr N= — Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington U �O O � y O T N` Cd b 3 cad O i N N ry O ke) � U � U U b O � U M .M ti C ti O 1 In ~ ti O W B A o Cd U 75-� N ca a � U PLO o UO � tl •� M v � Q N Q N on b b 0 uO ~ N N N N M O tp s. U o U y b N P U C N A U O tj lb V] M C4 CIO P; S-� O U .L a bOA Q o U � � U 5 U 5 O O b0 z o _ u o a w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington `i�-4k- W y e W - _ ..�_ r E _ wL 3L ' 3 I I I On LU w P 1 I V i �? 4 L i.. �i 4 L T 4 t 1"" � L L. L = L L P. L S a, Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 :1 City of . Washington � 8 - N 0 00 rtir ry ON N 7C U, LL P4 rq ,O U U U O aJi N N N °O O • � ¢ O r OoV0 x '� N CS Z2 ti G7 'o 00� N x b d U O O tl tl 'II 9 O 4t N U N 0-0a � � o � � o b P4 O C O t u y y Jr" M O bQ bQ Fr kn � M P. CIO � z ct Q o Is "Zt w o b : to Q w a !aaU0 H Pow Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington �4. AA j-'I k. 1, i 0 rr y�• 4 ' , ! , i" I ! k -�w L ,, ► , r R I � i ! P i+ Y W X e w l L. A�y- �1 X l i e .��1 r It LU ! I ! -_ • ' X Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 00 00 bOq �O O U O O N O O M O ry ON N U s. O N ` ti O ti ti .0 � '�• ON a v'�r O O 3 � � N O Fb O n F Ln O�p a Fr .o "O ti tl ,Nr O c ry U o o O O N O 00 M N O In O a. U O O 1z v o 3 00 m Cd ri M a vi c4 U U Q• U SU rte, O ti � � O Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington .s t OWA CIA LD 0 46 v Y. rl.�ta� J N %6- s f E . 1 ; I = � c IL�k" IL 4 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington rq -o 0 o m a� -d o U � U N 00 O 00 - N cry "d y O 'U O N b ti ti M b d rq� O 0.; O � M O � M ti ti r� Cli a O O A o a � •� a � m V] 'U' N C U A i Q N i Q N lu a lu N N M en N U O [� E21 z U o Ij 3 V r�i PO-i V] U U � U Ln 72 a � � U ai V1 � ti _ Cd a _ 7 aCa .aUO Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington r t _ fF ¢ k .L •• - Y ad �• "fir _ `_ - k a. a �.� I �+" t. 1 • �L Z 4p i 4 ti � i y f { 1, mot, 'Q,1 - • - �+� ry-I �k 4 ri LL R Via. t�• � w y �� '�' ui •o . r « $ 4 000-0 :AM x M • Y Lr Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 :. City of . Washington O kn O O O b In - a o ' U N U ti W .Y •� � a � N � � N N M 00 4..i Oc r _ x z N O N w o n a N N C) c� V] A U 04 +U+ � a a � 39 Ln 0 � o a o ° o — O M 01 _ O U p b s. V] M Gy Vl fir"' 71 U o v c. to 1!--4 ,.0 � u0 dvi � Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 ri I "1 � y Z � J 0 1 Y. a !■ —_- _'4 F1 � �' VVV _ fJ d. FF y i • � rrrt�t City of Pasco,Washington AO L 11it,MM%' - Li'lu o' JAU l k L L Ow d + Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington Y "71 v a ° o U N N 0 ✓�. ON N kn U iCUC. O tl � ti � CY ti ti cV 'O U • Y Y A A by Ct ti IZ It 3 •3 • o ° 0o y O U O W � U Q A O H O O �1 C ter° '8 ��yy pp ti H - V S cn 3 O U N � 7 U U O C p 00 00 o ° x ZI U o m U b C/O M Lll CIO CIO a � A U � U � a P4 y U cd U U 7Ui U cOO O 4� aQ .aUO � � W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 :• City of . Washington 5 VA r` it r !. i e i 4 �o CIO ,{• -e'�f r!.��`X1' r�Mwillai a��.V.. . '``°� ,...i � vuY , �F 5 '1 . 1 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 •1 City of . Washington CIO 0 0"0 Oc > o � b b a o 0 0 b b tl ti � CZ. O O O U � U Z3 Z ti .Z ti ti `I a N a: a U O ` ti zz ZZ N In ° � 3 o w .55 O F U � W ~; a ILI U F v] Ln O z q N q N � � o ILI 000 - W o U o h M o pp p � b � U O � O z U O b N i V] M P. CA c�C m aQ U z Q ` ZS U O U N • N 7y �� • ti b0 • ZS Cd s � O _ U v U W 00 Cd U y rn N W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of Pasco,Washington . w 1.w ° ° ,1-4 ��� 6 5, v RI ryry 9t LMM.. 1j, L a T► � s F r t ^ 4 --- -M• ..ham 4-1 - a 4 S IL t�k I L. L L 6 t ! y-' � ., ` L .L Y a.-`.L.i ri,p f si .. /* Roll: U�v G l Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of , Washington g E — / j \ § % \ \ u & a / } Z / \ 8 � » 2 \ / § � \ \ / 2 3 § » 3 \ » ^ \ ) j @ & E ( 0 \ m \ 2 m m u w d � $ § 2 & � % ZS a ) % Q ® \ 2 O g \ & a c E & } {~ \ { & � \ \ \ \ \ \ ƒ fZ / / � } b-0 - 2 _ \ 7 j / - 2 / y / j \ \ \ \ ) Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 • City of Pasco,Washington ILI ' l_ f, 1_ OL L:r .a a w tell AIC �. ;e l •, — i_-$F : 71 df I �r�_ . �I �P.� � � e •• � F P a W Ovum y � k � -. � .l nib �: � �_ - •�. � 't ��_ � - { :A _ R , 7 a II N. C•d, v _ Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of , Washington @ @ e e ° °rq — / k \ \ § & ® 3 % % ~ \ ~ \ .G - ) § m e � A / § ; IU u m a u [ ƒ & % / 2 k ] j\ ƒ 2 2 o � / ) \ \ ) \ \ § _ ' @ R E 2 — < \ / \ \ \ \ ƒ \ 3 \ \ \ \ \ � { } tg k _ ± ; . § , - \ / / \ j \ \ \ \ \ ) Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 • City of . Washington IL will 1 i II.. 4 w h� I IL s Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 •. City of . Washington r, .� 1 a� ° o w U tl b 1 b b U U U .U O cUC sUUi L"• • U O ti O ti U � o � w 5 b bq O 7� O o Chi O O O O O O O — i". OU h In M O N O _ O ° aUi h C U U G b y r p v U Cd U o R q o u �� U N U Z3 t4 • Cd w d F ° _ Q - (� S o w a1 .a U 0 UN v C4 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of Pasco,Washington I a, r id t= ( Ll L 1" L L : IT j :1 " T � . V N af k 901 41 R a uj IL 9 — - " p J � '�4 •±;j .i.s-.�� DTI � .. _ �' -, I �• '1 � /,�,, � *.,� M�. �+-• `I� 4 I � ---AAA... I� y 41 T Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of , Washington \ / & % \ 00 ) % 2 & R \ & \ / § ! d _ \ \ / / . & ƒ -01 2 _ \ w EO # ) j = o a \ -Z ® m A m 2 k \ ) 2 2 / d \ d \ § & % \ m z = / r c@ r- 7:1 § \ § / & ] 2 7 § m % I { } tl 8 k Z \ ƒ / l - _ } � k / { } \ � ® - \ \ \ m § j 3 ± } \ A = Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013-2018 .. City • Pasco,Washington pir UA 0 FIL G ,11 1 R'- I Li U) —P" IL 1 vk joy k LU I ..j Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington > 0 0 0 0 S N N O o ti b 1z 14Z b Cd O rn U C y ti N • O 42 o IZI C 4 �0 ti ry C IU p o x 0 C o 3 ed Ln ti ti O O O O c\ry O Q � � � •o � ti 0.y ti k _ O '� ❑❑ Co9 N U p kn a� r p N O v Vl M un m U •� �i U Vl � � U ti wf� aUO � E� vi � W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 — City of . Washington 1 R ffi Rt[vc log #• t 1 h 7R>VT TiYTB 3P1$!1 T{)LTO k1 Y tam � do'hONH ti Ul e C, I IL L..... r.. 4 w arras 'L - ' ■■ ■■■■ � fir, '� 1. - y L I I �..i ' ! kph Lij i � r e I }. t as rra*wTa >i w w A ILa ' -w n, lea•,wuueN., 4 ' w ' lk y it` i h r �' do I 3n TAM" 1 , Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of , Washington j § t / § \ 00 \ 2 \ \ 2 \ \ . . _ ƒ � � � \ o a 0 2 2 '\ \ / \ \ _ _ . & I \ = w \ \ } )u m ~ A \ \ \ } \ Q { \ ti .k } f j Cd E / \ Sj \ \ w 2 \ \ ( n un \ w Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013-2018 , City of . Washington ! : t It I Ei f aM I, A Ot I. MAW 0 DO ' r', _r 5 � I r� I m m�arse wt-k 4—. IL Al LLI LL 3 i +.tip` �+''` �°}k� ��wt i�' .�� s'i'`•.- �" °'' *�. Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of , Washington ; § & ; Z3 / § - � » \ ! . 5 \ � � 2 a ƒ o § \ u W • 2 ./ _ / 2 2 w ® \ \ § \ ) , \ o a \ \ \ � ® m & 2 m 2 a o u $ toy toy m rq 2 & ) k m & 2 0 g \ \ } \ } ° _ M \ \ - e — ƒ Cn _ t } \ / \ \ � \ \ � \ § Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 , City of . Washington .. ALI- c ' Awl VOW Of ,� =Sr a ►. y L I CO M et ` 4; � ry _n �► s • i� Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 1. City of , Washington , § & \ \ � \ 7 \ \ 7 \ \ 9b \ , _ y \ \ \ & 2 \ \ ] § - j 7 _ � j ) » / » ^ / 0 \ ' R & \ R & & § . ( Z % & : > ± 3 ) [ j § & j & & ® § E § c § § ® 2 2 w Q \ \ \ \ \ a u � ƒ / \ ƒ / \ .( ` � } i \ & - _ dlu \ ` j \ : ƒ { § j / / .� $ j j 3 w A = Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013— 018 , City of . Washington OL h w � tL a 4 4 - � r 17 A k AIM ),03NN3A1 - � . t.i.� e.- al - • ate. 0 Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 1: City of . Washington 00 00 3 � U S n Y n n ro o 3 a w • ° h a �. ° 0 ° U • � 3 W V r4) N N lu In U W H 1 � o 14) 0 0 IQ•yi O ,ccq� W 'd A O p w s. paw O .n 2 'o^ M V1 M W V1 d t0. �r Y l - � z mQ lu, U � � • � i 4 � � v _ o W U O N V O 413 N ar: auO H caw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1• City of Pasco,Washington I � . 1 i e e N E' e W x_ 1..1..E � � ` ff .e7 EE 1 .. _; i. I L L i ry Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of , Washington ® / lu j lu \ % 2 \ % 2 \ \ { ± ; § \ ; § \ f R 2 \ R 2 ± ~ \ IU / E / 2 2 o $ a 2 ) t 2 2 j o ± § 2 2 U @ ƒ d \ ƒ d \ § ( ] S \ \ z k IC \ \ kid - \ / j = j � \ . i j � § § ƒ 2 2 % a / / Q u c < z A = . Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013-2018 City of . Washington l t�h Y +111 f` LL -.��a� � -�i. �•I SIN ��� - i _. � �� i i J IA 1 4 iVA t 1 (^ 1 LLB � • F e 'r. I � J. ° z. . Fa' fi �T W - kt."'4- Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington « 2 \ \ \ \ \ ; \ 2 3 R & \ \ g � ° % & \ % \ \ \ \ ) - 8 2 ; � \ � , \ 0 % % \ 2 @ a S - = j u / & % & 7 - \ � . Q } - \ ` • R ( . / 0 j / \ P. j .4 \ \ Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 City of . Washington 1 M J- A rwii, a r, ,. `*(D LL fly - �1 r 11 � . G At , ry r ' t w ' " i ,� M '+c �• 'ice u R � �i< � "�� , , � i �� Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington % t 00 \ ( _ 2 § _ \ — Z tb > k # E w f [ u \ \ \ ( \ _ $ a \ 2 « 2 m « ® m 2 \ } \ 2 2 a § .7 2 \ o ( % t & _ § \ \ \ \ / j \ E _ \ b = j _ \ � \ d .4u] C CIO Aw Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington K .,: -" x ,qi 'r 5 ti i Y 4 4Ck ' 1 ; 4 f� 4IF .o ry LUk X y L +L, L1J LU 4L U) 'y a � U) LUIF Ij 11 1p f'�b y,a {* �,hf� 1�� r�i 1�� J'x � � _ f y J 1■S ` IL -Ev Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington O U N N O O y CL v. U U — O N N O — O CV •� � 0� O � � O O y 'JY N 3 v : y O U m O U 22 ni kn � O Y OO�!! IJ y cd U F. u °3 A U 2 O sa d O N 'r M zi O U _ N U N o a o U o y r oo v) M , M Ln U U bq 'Z3 O q p u 00 N N _ O A � oc N le M N _ V'1 .M-i Y1 M 000 U 1Z1 N _ O U � � O N U o N a j b y Q m o ti eo o u w w � ca ar au0 C7dUunu 0. wW Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco, do i X.111' Ie dP ! Y dP W 43'.•_1, a {r`,. � •:�� . � � � f CL r uic - a= 14111 / a i"!her a � rte. 4y LU !M! Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 00 ca y 'o^ a > N ti C3 � N U Q N a U tl Z3 ^r � Ci ^i � O QBOO � � U U � O 7 � O o CZ ° N <z a ° N o o °o o Z3 14) CZ U F" ° o, Z L a d a� — o 0 0 o S 'zS h h N U o ° ii m U Z p Q U ti U � 0 a A a U10 C�7 04 w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington �.. iM M4. 0 4k LL LL 44 * { 1 1 J ' ii 4 � 1� '• y �. a —! �:.z. _ L "I 1 i S • 4 . — L 0 _ OL w � 1 i I LZ l - _ Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington 0 0 -d 0 3 � � U A cu O O N t _ cC ` 3 '21 d • d N ~ s Od U iu .� a F � Y ti N N U �+ w Z U ,� O CO U U U a 1~ W b 4:4 1=1 p M C1 a� W — p0 - �M�7, O � bq ,tiG' bq Z d U O P, V] P, RS S y E .. - U � V ZS U P, (IaUO dv� P; W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington AlT J, Iri CIL 4 �J rs• w� t 4k it r�Ey..:.r. ,�..• h�+�l r � f 11 " f .,. .: h, as 999 . 8 � n i 5 n " u • • Fw 4�L Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 00 = m a o N o 0 3 U � Fq W ID °� ry N O ' y O O N •-- d O d O O '•� � �+ N � � N N O 3 0o O v'Y v'Y O — � V7 M ` O 0 cz O ti ti ti N O O V'1 I kn — .y 00 _ -q- N N It d w � "LQQQj � ti � ti 00 O vti O fy 'Jy N O rq w O � FT, U o o U 8 o Q N Q N by -d ~ a ~ O N .S 3 0 0 0 O ON O N 7 app NC I L lu v � b m U V] M cd U Z q U � � 5 U N C � o Y a� - o ': Cd _ Old •N �i V V] � � ��.. U U O V � N b Q � W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington IF uif z 1 Q j } i i Q 1 O a 1 Mud r r 1 de 3 1 h Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 00 cc A IZ3 - ti CD cqO U x w ti 3 O ti O+ N N � O N o 7S N N N U b FQy y v� Q Q S N U a U oo ti ti U Lr � U � _ Fr � � U O C. U � U � � U � U N O Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington k ' T i r w }. z LO CO ry w F- } l 5 R Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 0 0 0 0 — �, v, V C W W 0 00 U O O O O kn O c-J r^, rn L lI pp ;Z Y n d � O O. bA N — v Its ti ti ti IU ZZ ti ti ZZ M , Cn S — 7 It O .1 ti v ti �i N O 3 0 N Pr f" I ti C ti ti CIS Cd _ 1 FTy N 61 a Cn Cn cd H a O c g g S C-q 0(; — _ _ O tl 8n en � z � Q - � a U O U p Ln ti J• tc l a � In w � Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington •,. "+. a ' d.a- a, a� ■ ■ , irk f N W sr T M ' t l �r U) UJ W w • t Lam- A+� Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington , § \ \ j 4, » r j � » 00 _ a ® \ \ 2 \ R 2 \ \ ƒ / 31z j ) � <Z' & . j \ ' ° ± . < m , m & § ) & � ) � . \ \ 1z \ ^ \ ; R 7 m o a ) & ® m ® m 2 2 — $ g a 2 2 U � ® — % Ic z _ / \ - _ = S ] \ ƒ \ % j / ƒ w } Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 City of . Washington z A. J J LL L LJ Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 1 City of . Washington o 0z �c 00 C u r r Ory a, N N � C cY�C O '� c0 d � n O s. U U u ��., U c0 � O iC3 O N ti ti '� cV O C N N N b � y • � � Q O �O �D N V1 U op - D 3 ¢ 0 cd -q- 1z' ` M cq N a 0 0 b o a zt 0 U W Gc, O F °' IU O m m o O U Q N Q N lu T ❑c O � oc — N O U 2 N OIn O U Q z - U o 3 ro Ln O U_ O ti U O R: W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 1 tt 1 a W CL �I i D [..� LlJ Aft Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington a c b H _ 00 -0 zz ti ,vim y Y U N YC O � cif, U N $ 3 4 °o N 3 ari+ 'C CL • N O 3 b a, � N � v; O h h o o j a 3 3 U y o a 0 N 0 N N U U "I " onao o W � o a � In kn n rq a � o U Y � U t N 3 N N O _ n O S� y b b is C y bOA � U O N - Uz � Q lu _ U U Cd to z C1 U _ y J y Cc S b 01 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington z w w e C) w w z 0 U) 0 C) 06 w w z Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 00 00 � V1 V1 cd a 0 a 0 N 3 0 0 1 p N N N rA 0 3 y N a 0 0 U o a� ° s • � 0 0 O N 'U N � o I j O O — In H W U P. •1 zz M •1 M s. Q ti a Q CU v a 3 U Cc* o 1�5 •° 4 U Z cc q 'y U N Ln Cd � y y o - aq �lUO raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington Ablo ro+oa.v J -AT mug _ J T IFI W i5pu i7 On 1 } �r Uj - 3� " ae' ���•v T Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 00 U Q U w bA c� N R 0. Z3 12 � y � O aU+ U U N CD � cy rq ON N > d a U ti F' >, CD — OO G9 U a (� • N ti Z' y - ° a: gaUO Aw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington Aff N. flt �r-I t LU w LU LL ,� - a Ok z� �- W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 'o O °o °o °o w �'4 o ° N � o -d o ca a�i a� • O � bA .b � O � Z3 ti Z3 ti rq a O O N (Y r'ti �N 5•r O O O 0 3 CA CA 10 ME 1�j U U N O O PLO bp a dq ¢ v O api � N C _ O Ovii O .4 h zt ' s7 z > , p , U � a � Q U CG y U ti lu Ln ti > a A Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 • City of Pasco,Washington uin 1 ''�. - �' It �• � ' ui CO 4 _ V � f k _ a a low IF Of U) TV �Mp IL 1.6 Y/ 1 T 1Y�6 • ..- .JA t � "TTpp"ff Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 f 1 City of . Washington co co 00 3 3 � N W N N .4 a � o � U co �D lu ate ° o � Q Cd y b1J 3 N N M PC ON a O O U v 1j (u O Cq � O — M — N O O � U � V tl ti o W O zj a A - ul O 3 Q w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington OL * rk l4 1 1 "4 1, y LU 1A T J" •� `. fft i d L Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 3 m A y O 1 ON N U U Z 5h C3 •� � � 'Jr N � 'JY N N ❑O❑ y0 O C/1 � iG iRS. 4U. U 'O O O ti 5 Z2 N ti OM N `3 O O O II I s. 1-, ai Q Fa !ry Qy >' N OMO QI O H U V rte, V cd o � 0 U � Q U lu N o �I O U y U O Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington � - � I � � � ! � � ' ! is 1�'f g_ � 1 i• I a i " � . �- . � ,I . r yam' 4 iii. o II w er Fes• - = �..�,,• � '�;: ; r � I _I_. � �� ' � 14• '=� UNA f Y OLI� r ' W 3 E 7. LU r_ d.. � 1 y Y 1 - yat •4 i'i — Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington 0 w Z 'Ic 00 y U w m a v T. °3 o awi a n n n rq U p — N U U ,S7 •� .0 ,L ca w W s 3 o ° o tz! M s M M �1 .. O Q .7 '2 PC, ZZ a U ID o N C a ~ a Q O N O O . C� Ri K� U N N Q y � 7 cpc� _ j O pq h 3v a � U .n 0 Lt as Q ' u � U � of � w o ti P.,Q u 0 3 ca w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington L�' , ui LUh ■ ■ I _1 ui 06 IF CL k ,�• 4 k r y y rye w , faA J > ' I �- t ' ' I yl 1�'IL LU ui OD4'�. . roy c. Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 . City of . Washington U w, 0 cJ� O � �. Q' �' ON � D•. N O U � O 0.i y rA 'C Z b \O O O ti ti cC >, s. a �•• N ON N on 0 0 :3 'u N W ° N ° �Y ° N a N r� o � � Z CZ,C� a Mr4 U 3 Ln lu ti ti U O c� O U y _ r U ;t [� ;t tl U U •� O b m lu � U U O .5, O ti w W O 0 Y o Cl b Q a > w Q a U 0 w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington MIR LV LO L U) IL fy i L � 06 . A'I Y L F _ �� 1 l � e f IL ui 1J + - ui LU ,d - A Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington o v cq rn o cc 00 8 N 00 C C' 13 C p LL �. Ory 'J. O O o . 71 A o � RC 3 0. ° Y ° N o rl .Ur y U � bO IS w° ai C- U F 3 ai oo ti G O o a' v, a Q W ° o a�i o U a o; > 0 3 U O U M - k - O � p '3 •� •� U h � Cr � tl U O bA.0 N W U J V U � � U O , Cn . ti b0 • �4 0 --d �' b a g a U 0 P4 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington 1 - t �A ad — ` Ilk t4 IL L 410 4k I 1 r a 1 ' sa • . 73 I,_ r LU AVOW, w _ ui r r " Nt ui I Ii .w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington � oc 00 Z2 l O � � O 00 C ti Z3 ti � b E O O N bA \C l� Cq ,O U 4o.- ti U Y y N U O 13 O O rq U � U •� N N N W U iNi U U [� 78 ti 1 ti N N N O U O yp P s W N N N � o U Cr O O kn O Cr F2 ro �: It y uz _ o U � U U ti w O � Oar a Ca .aUO a� W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington ir 4w. Y � i 1r 4 AM CO LLI 0 1 d W s: "T—r-777 7' W .. Ir L ' I d Iy � A ` _ ` I T fy1 4 N4L �{ dk Y A A ''�Y„�{, � � �C {T�•yam,'� 'S�- a� � Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington bUp � � � � �'�-• N � "w N N N a �• N N Chi 'b U N N m id iC .�•� � � b ti N b b N Cd U N U • O C'j a 0 U � b o vii o U � � y f3� U U U U U Q i 96 3 o o r on o C4 U a w° op � •O w S3. Q Pr T Q O U M 0.1 � U � v � � po • � 0 o a Q a U 0 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington U) 0 U) z LLJ x w z 0 1 U) r), 1 LLJ ry LLJ z Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington N Y 3 0 8 Fj W O 0 0 G Q U aZ3 d ° aU+ U -. z L� Rey O 'C C] L1 Ic m vat o � o 0 6n N Cdz � Q u U Is U ti O G U m w A a U 0 Rte'+ W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington Ov y ,Y > '+ X F A' C Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington � � o o ❑ rx oo 00 00 E y b O N N U 3 U O O N. U O 8 U cy ti — � •to bOD •`3 a� • vii vii - � ed In N ° s z4 ed 13 'J. N 'Jr N N y y A . UW v� v o H pi O O ~ ~ O cC O O Ei H � U R" a, � •� o �, o .r �..i N 10, \ M — � v � v v 3 ro 14) o � � � z � Q z Q � U N O ti � N U N V C c a Q a U 0 w Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of Pasco,Washington I � r — r _ LL uj CO Ld CD ui � bs j s�w►'aaau r' L � A << t l �I d L� t< ,,d 6 I� LK L — yr �� ••� `' 3 _ ,_ i + L 9 L t_,l u. i �_ aril f' Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington 0 ti ti 00 00 00 P '',�v�d," � � N � ° 3 o � b � O � CO h h • • °� N W X � � w o Z3 ti 4) O o ,ti a In a Q N a Q N bA O O _ v� O Ovii h � h cx� IU CdZ � Q U � � a. ao q � ti o ti Ln � z _ O a� fQ 78 a g a U O W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington I..r ir d k ► � � 3� � �r 1� I w � d V1' i k S r k- yF d I p � ,J K I 1 - • 'k g I ' v 6 k,l'I '�.I�I���r �i � �- s • ..w'_�1�.�s �' I� ° �.i ��. �4 �i �.. to j I _ a I F a i r JL to m II 5 I -i 5• t . p E - f}}f7 yL -t,�. t I 3 11. I I f L��, 1.5 1 w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 .1 City of . Washington > o s H 00 N N lu OA O v b 00 � Pr l 00 O ti 'Z1 O ti rq o Z ZI ,.q U U 00 U C) O 2 LM M py O bA }a� y 00 OSp U V A A - N 7:1 Cti M � O CG Ci b-0 � p z Cr z CS Z q U U 3 ` Y 0 agavo 3 raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington Nr 1P1 i , 41k C w $ � ,y , r w N' �4-jot Ilk LU 1.. f r , • 1 r • + Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington m co ca Ai N N N "3 O b U O � b ON ro O /. m m O O O N 0 U W b b b 13 tl tl ti O y 3 � 3 A � .� N c3 C ti C ti ti 14) 00 ` ti N ,O W U 77 � S O Ci ti C ti Cd C� U p" �O bA cd •� U U � n O •p�q +U+ v z CdQ U U N Ln U S O ti z N w O O� aQaUO raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington LL ui M5 I 11 ry l y , I � ' �!7�' V� µ � 5ti f - �• �M1�� N i W ° F Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 00 00 00 00 Oc � O O O — ¢, cd 'rte ON O N z It bA O 0 v v p z rA 1z 13 Y cc3 by U U O O U c Z N W ti 00 Oc bq `� y N [� U o U w Cd o p m u z C3Q R Q o U Ln • 1 ti o ti y o lu wC1aU0 raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington F77 i =. ," LU t..0 t JMai C y* 4 W r4 4 M 7 y �. Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 .. City of , Washington 10 . \ o _ - / » o � « \ \ Q = \ \ \ o § \ 7 ] \ / \ \ f \ \ \ \ -'Z3 § \ \ � / \ ƒ , c — f y = w k ƒ ° / & o Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2018 City of . Washington t! 4 L N CIL �,kn W i CL' 1 R 8f�' 1. 1 - Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 41 00 00 U ctt t. O U R O ,b N k O Cd Z b Z b b G� O xJ 3 � N O Ca N ti _� ti ti CN 0 0 H b 'C O y 1 N N A M O N t N N ~ ti lot 0 > m Cn l � 3 U U In If) If) � � O U U ' M O M C- U A In FOJ w U f'" O N Cr O Vii U C13 C) O a, w U cd U z by O o a Q a Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 .• City of Pasco,Washington _�dM°-4-~`ter. � �-� • - � �. �h� .d'�� f, - .Y � r1 �1! r , e h ] AE Y . - rR- ..f it 'q � ..�y�� { Lam■ 't �� i�1 *r�, �.`-oil uj 1 � I�:-.-` �,, - - • j ' "fir` W � rte'' hi, _,� �� - ��` — 1 r�It.i�?• y.��. •� �s'yi .� ,'_, .as 'ter.�� s`� - Y!�.�- � i+V -fir '.i �S.• - 40L ji 4+ II r • _ Ric r '* ! '�• 4;fir{- •�• . •�.� � ♦ — r Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington FG N O Y 00 N 00 "C y O ti N O O .� � � Cd b � lu M v 0 In U yy p A ,y N N CU N � P. p •� � � ti ti � ti ti R7 <71 ID C o ° owl ) M � a 13 A W M p S: M i'+. S cC O O y 00 Cd C1 y V lzt O O O ti Cd x -° V P4 �O •� O � � cd A. N Y N y Ci 'ti Z4 Cd z ZZ Y yCl � � N h N N V N Cq O N — O N 4' ti N Cd o m N u z C3Q N a R Q o _ U C� � ti o ti Ln y o - 1:4 aQaUO raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington •4,L ti AF M w l M ^ 1 r 0 'r All- X aF� _ k _ Mr - AO !r ��—�• � + - !' a J' `� ,�yr# 4 � Y Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington o m 00 m 2 p, w w ° o A N Lti N N O O O xi U 0 O 00 w •� °o UH a W `° •� � 3 0 � •,r7 .� bCA � V �" N U S N a o 0 0 d Q N Q N OC U o •� � U cd o w o Cd z � q - v U 1 U ti o ti Ln z ty y o - . lu 1 y wC1aU0 raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 9 � 5 _ - (,!] ; , J w m, [L w � :` F icy f } o 4 � ILLI U) AO w } 6.. ZY; Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington o w ti OC 00 00 8 A q a.. m �S O A bq . s0. O 7,_5 q O o b In C O tb 3 '° y o on w R Y o c o � ti0 � ✓ti N � � N �- N In O N y �O ti m .� a� Id iCS er~j � CS ern ti a ti oc n O ooa v� � on y .c � � �• h t� .4 iC R3 U CX 7 4 V] U .si O F- .9 U � a� • hr. U m bo W 4o O ti aCggN N U U0 q raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of . Washington JT JW OL 3 • _ �� ~ •_r * , �+ f �► "� .ti f W i ui s r + i �4y N. �. ML " Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington t j % \ ® '3 i s % & \ R & \ \ ( \ \ , • \ - . @ , m ; o § d , C) 0 \ \ 2 2 Cu a o Cu ) 2 2 [ ? ' 4 ' — c — R { \ t .B / � Z \ / a \ _ — / \ ( / \ to - to \ w \ w ` � % ƒ \ ._ q e ) ` 7 / / / .4 u o $ P4 4 Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013-2018 City of . Washington a-0 M a) a) z Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington o 0 0 0 0 - O U o a� C1 Y tl ti ti m U y U S~ � H id O ti O ti ti ff ti O O O N N N Cd 3 o a O � O ti ti 'O U 3U-i N Q Q W U O N O O Q O 5 •� f0! � O U S N U '1'� N ua L-L-MbA b . p b O ❑ � •U � O � 41 00 00 � M k, b0 v A; CA Li o ZI i� N U � � YU O � b4 • b�0 � � H o � O a Q a U O 05 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of Pasco,Washington E m L Cm 0 L n i ry N0 0 J Aw Q Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 :1 City of . Washington 0 00 y v y U m — 30 O - �y -� N .d ❑O O O� — O — Ory ry O y U •� O c U • M 3U-i 3U. BUR.' y y 13 tl ti 3 ti ti a O • N N c O p .O N -A I O W Y ON w0 LL SX'-i G U ca ° O ti ti C Q W A 3Ui N Cz V] A '.yY � oN0 � y �.. .17. �-• :� N 00 M ,� �n O F O O N p p N p N O j O O U] U] a � � N N t O Q ry Q ry bq k _ O LYC7 � N �O 7 U o U W =o Ln V Pr V] U O OJ 0 r.. N Z Q U � � U .x, O C ` ~ IM o W O ' - U c a Q a U 0 Ln W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington V) E 0 X a) ■ Aw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 0 o c A 00 N O O O 0 O O � a0i A. N ��., s�.r " O 13 tl y ti ti rq A� CL 3 � > " 7d aoi y lu Q ?: 'Jr N rY '�• N N N q c � 3 3 ya. m ti In ti fV ti Cd �T i p F C O W O 0 0 o c zj .d Ln o a QCA Q N a3 a� O DO a vi F 3 °u ' U Z a Q • Zt � U N t4 • N 0 g _ - N U h Old GJ a (� .aUO Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington r I I r.rr+r� r I � r `#. k a c r W �` 1, nroo ui ! V _ s' ui 06 L 7 � li •. It I� fi �d ° wWw e G Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington Wu CIO � � Y Wu O p b b b N y � O 69 Con z z � O O O b ;O x 3 N N U W o OOc O°O0 0.i F ti t5 v � N N ZS V O ti U 77, 7z tbA O cC d) O — u k O 00 O V � v 0 a C fr; U Z ¢ Q N � U O S O ti b0 cd � C _ U 0 o LQ w f1 a U 0 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington I. * Ike- T � a f W W W x - jF Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 :. City of . Washington 0 00 ti Oc 00 51 1-11 _ - o lo Ic U y O ¢' O U 0 U U p CA ti 0 - U cd cC 00 M 00 — p m U y U � O O xfl, ti Ci C3 ti ti rte. r' N y rti N N ON O U C0 a�i N N a U H 3 lu Cd °q o O iG ON o m W [� 0 CIO a U Z U U Ln U S O ti b0 ` S tu w0 � U CX Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington ui r' f u 1 t. L} - ui LIJ CL I IL ILL -17 w e` Jyl ail T r� � P . y� �, a ,� ■ , d4 I A L L Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington Oc cc 00 a O o O rA 0 v .n o 'b 0 o kn kn b � � o a O M U O ti � O ti ti s7 7C rn 0 0 o 3 ' o a � � O p U a u lu o OC I O In [� U 00 Z � Q Q � U N O o O ., o _ U wAaUO � c4w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 :• City of . Washington -- r F W up[ Y E I PO W - r ,/may, f '. �s r LU ■ ar s z r LL LU LUd � i.1F m'Rf. tI ui 'know, r r I E Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 •1 City of . Washington U b � o H � O O - �+ z b b b O N N U z o N .y i3. � U U U W � •� o y O U a� Y U UX 7 G4 CX W t U O U U � w � ZD Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington eL 0 a In.A a a � � r•,�, a'� pJ 4 5 �4 ° i A t C ry ` 1 r7 I W� I $ fy LU � � n (D W CO r [ W 0 Ar Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington v a g o ° � � X00 00 IZs 1.3 r. �L, W N N N Cd 3 C U N U U O Nti ti H O y N N N N U zi C1 CL, W N Lti N N G P4 A U U N N y C7 3 Z3 C m 3 . °Q ° O b o Cq r O ti C '�, � m � 'd � o U W N U ''�•' N ti7z o C ss. °"� •� a M .� � M U U Q ry Q ry ° o ° a pur o o - m � U vi rig v a � w o w U Z a A ` U � Lu Ln o Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of • Washington ui LLI a Lam' �.' t' '���• ,� j- ``, - � lu • 3 s� `� .h�a w . y� � � �. L-. "s �' `•'��� .^ Diu `� x6. t d � , J 'I F• r � 44t c �� y� � t � � r a sl 'j i� •! I it IWrilll ; � .A �. dl 51 411E ii � dr � r i"i tr '•° `" ' i 4 nro LijS i ! Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington 0 0 o - o ti 00 00 00 U U a b U IS b ti b b w � o Q o � U � � U S w ° o w v U N o 0 •1 � M •1 � M as O Q ry kn on 3 - o U [7� m 0 Ab a3i o 7 a3i �' v1 v w v� vz � Q Ln U � U O C ti � y U O w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington a W s a S t k4; p j , r) W fy 1 �l 0 I� Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 •. City of . Washington on y L. 00 cc 00 O cd ca 'O ti v ti O � Q W a ry N N O � W � O • � � O O y eta ° a � N N 0, O O 0 y cd M (� M b 7, Cn O ti 0 1 1 cd O Q F CC O A O O p O d 0. U U Q C O U] uo f d Cd o U m K UZ� �z U w to O U Q O U ti o � _ U 0 Q c4 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of Pasco,Washington i ■ 5 City of . Washington o c s 00 s 0 ct lu n n � �o 6n — ° o � r ate ° 3 — � YO • M v� 3 O C 'r O � O A 0. O o ca a� ca _ A 00 ell ;z u 94 O M M � Y N ti M O o 00 ❑� o kn U M ``� � ❑ � bq � O�q Cr m s ° s 0 Qj a w u ° z � Q U � � v � b a Q a U 0 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 •• City of . Washington ry + Alp, � - r ; •, r' A W 4n _ 4r I W { Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 11 City of . Washington o 00 o o o °^ U O O O � H � r1i N � '�'� N N U U U Q � � bA 4 1. A Id U N C N N Lsr .4 V Fy Q 4? C N `~ �Y � N N y U W F4 d v o, u O U ti U 1 to M M U � Gy~i p O p O i U O O oc O .U+ 4r N O O O 3 0 3 3 3 n U ca b u Z Q Cn NO ° a� U � U N O � y U N N Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington .M 0 0 I IN r u M Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington 0 0 i cc ti ti Z3 ti kn 0 S � v N cd Off. N 4. N N In O � O O — N iti p � L� U 6M9 O � ti d ~ tl d ~ ti U U U U 3 � U00 U Z a Q U h U i ti yy O �D - a C1 U10 C4 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington AL ui IL in ui VP 4' -LLL--jLA L- L JIM q I .:. ►, y ,. `a \.► 614 ` x` #`1' 4 Y Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington b Z .y N O r�r O O N N 00 U � ° 01 .o �o o � x o00 e z o e TY � N N N ca ` C 00 O p .S' O H • 00 V1 M a7 3 c4 0 3 ti x ¢ t °; C � N a x v ° N j 00 cy OCi ti ti ti 71 O m Gc, U F 3 a `�° o o � 14� O ° va � � U 00 W M 00 U Cn 0 C71 3 rn 3 � r-� a a ° ° ' �t o, 8Z U d Ln O U U � O ti N - sZ — a. Cap4u0 v f� W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington 0 x LU 0 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1. City of . Washington to — 00 00 — O N N s~ O N y O O — > O c N N N by • N N q U ti ^v tl 'r ti O O a N� 0 O kn Cq O U R Fr � H � z U ' N Q N O O M M — O — U U bj b V s7 p O p rn O N 4 •� Ij _ U � O. A S • N G Pr pOq (� O rr U � U y U w O ti N •y U L: N N P•a Q 1-a u O Psi W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington ,',� � �� .a I •I� 111 1 l �°I.At + �+�� , � d���'�� 1 yt� l mat. I � L x - ri rnt.rn P 41 Lro x T �I }I a 'k �, i'• �• ti' � :At' '�*. t W h— srn r�,tra W 3171 U. z w Q a 34,lmra 1S _j .......... 3Mr1 ri.'Ir-LLv 3". 1 I.H.IN f 3YY' Ya1S71gpN� �n®+a►.r{ Jar J.IiAludd r, Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1: City of . Washington 00 00 y a o o 0 Fr N N N O � � O U U ° y h Y � • h „� U U 'J. ON 'J•w O O 0 bA Y tl 2 O O O N •� W U Z q 10 ti o a A a U O W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1• City of . Washington CL 0 L 0 0— M Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington 00 00 M O o M ° Y N o rq IS U U U � U U N N t� L C U O ID 3 � a U U O • 0 0 rA T ai o G tl � ti a � w M M o. In 1r) In m 0 on lu . b .b � x N s D N d aQrA 0. Q CIS ° C Ln lu a� (D U v b ° -18 vs w Cn F i i� C) LO � ti o ti Ln 0 a A a U O C7 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington C) L- -r--A E M M M 0 M Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington a ti 00 '0 00 r'j m H _ , 0 0 m o y o a 0 0 U � U .d 5 ° O°, _ O ZZ5 IM. 3 u o co 00 cQ °N N U 0 � W O ON OM U a w u m m bq O In O 00 q O .� bq U Z a q q a q o U 4 o � O 0 a q U 0 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington . a LA A I s, 1 r 1 , 4 I�. �+•i" t � �� FI l Imo'. 4: { � 1. �F W'rE yen j 1.AJ f�, ¢ L CIA LO IPIIN I i P rip b., 4" F • Y -". r � � a Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington r. m a� a� b� oo 1 00 00 59 13 o 1.0 O o FA N U V .5 • 'sy H U bA bA O O — O — a3 0 0 7 ❑ a> v, ,.O U ca a> v O rr O � u W ,O O O C ❑ m Y N Y ct O O t M fp�px O > L-1 U CIS a ti a ti U U _ U _ O O IRS to N U O U � � • N � Sy a _ W o IA. u0 aw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington W 1 .iYF. i • 5 Cpl '" I' I�+ �' ' ♦ �• °v3 I. ,jr, �I 1 �..�. � _ `•' 1. fr t yr N L l CO 307 1e I� I I iL y R' It t ... L Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington 0 R.' Yx 0 cl N N N a� y ti ° N 0 y � p ry N N O � Y O O ~ zz ~ ti Cq U � V cd ,Q U A V 4 d w U ti �O ti Al kn a 3 00 w o O z oo o0 N .CC U U O 'C O d lu � z � Q l U o v � U O o W O 0 W Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of Pasco,Washington - 6 1 . L 1,,k n .. , . f { 4A*—\t-!L Mr - a9. .- fy mow IV- 1 + II Y IL • _ rho. 11 d MW11 I , I +. 1 � L 06 L-7 � 1' * - - i•Y 1 s� y '' S a iY Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington y � x �U vti N rti. N N CS C .d O ry b. N O ctY U U � W Cd Y L 3 0 o ti Z3 b-0 N V �O 00 — O O O M N N -- �j N N - 0 � ti ti W V q > ~ ~ 0 H Chi O bA U1 Q tit m 0 0 U y U O N d' 00 0 0 0 - - N N b11 N oUp O O C. Er O CS o a H l U � � v o ti o _ Q w 2 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 • City of . Washington J l w .. T �a+•11+ 1q ue' j•J�� �'. 0-e UJ J •�' •� t i f it ALI r a. *�' r e 4 �' ' I .`�, 4 to ; �•� � y U ++ W 4ii a COt _ CO I ' - f .- Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 1 City of . Washington 3 O U U O N CL 8 k r) M M CD O Q O ca 4 .U N N U F W WO 0-4 a CQC N u rr T y � ° 3 U O N N V1 M 00 O biJ O U u z aQ ` r Q ° U U h U U ti tz U � o _ _ aQaUO cow Capital Improvement Plan 2013-2018 City of Pasco,Washington W .1. 1.11 4 ' LU f Y xy i W r `' � - . - � •.. " �- + - � Ate_ _ l pP .uLi f ',.Y F � �hla • t}A U) 4 4 Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington b 00 ti 00 00 ON N � O N O U +' O � 'C cd 78 o � -n o, Cd � c°i • air O ��., � � � � O M � O •� � ti F Cd 0 d A o It E 2 1.2 ZS -Z N U � w on o o .. o u U O N N OV 10 � O N N [r O O j, rn h zt N o m � U N � b0 • b�9 aCd w 3 2z b � o � w w O N o y U O N �_ � U ti U aQaUO c� dH raw Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of . Washington z - - C ry w 73 w Capital Improvement Plan 2013—2018 City of , Washington j % % } % % 00 ) \ ) ƒ - ƒ ) S 7 _ — \ E \ - t E � \ _ � \ .2 < \ 2 \ \ 2 ) Q b 2 2 g a o a u . ƒ \ \ » � � \ / 2 / / u , � \ ) 3 { \ j \ . / Capital I p o emm!Mm 2013—2!R AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Counc 1 July 3, 2012 TO: Gary Crutch i . y Manager Workshop Mtg.: 7/9/12 FROM`. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Directoav SUBJECT: Rivershore Linkages and Amenities (MF# PLAN2012 -003) I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Draft Rivershore Linkages and Amenities Plan* * (Council packets only; copies available for public review in the Planning office, the Pasco Library or on the City's webpage at httn: / /www.pasco -wa. og v/citycouncilreports) II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 7/9: DISCUSSION III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. In May of this year City Council accepted the Tri -City Rivershore Enhancement Council (TREC) 2012 Rivershore Master Plan. B. In coordination with this planning effort, staff has assembled a draft plan which builds on the TREC plan for items specific to Pasco. C. In conformance with a specific Council goal and the City's Comprehensive Plan, the draft Rivershore Linkages and Amenities Plan seeks to provide, "...all residents of the City access to the Columbia River." The Columbia and Snake Rivers form approximately one half of the City's border and it is appropriate to consider the Pasco Rivershore as the "front door" to Pasco and the Rivershore Area as a key resource in ongoing cityscape enhancement. D. The Planning Commission has considered the draft at workshops in April and May, and recommended key changes to several portions of the draft plan. After a public hearing in June, the Planning Commission recommended that the draft Rivershore Linkages and Amenities Plan be adopted. V. DISCUSSION: A. The draft Plan is structured with a general amenities and opportunity discussion and then the rivershore is divided into individual geographic segments based on location and shared characteristics. B. Each segment contains maps depicting existing and proposed linkages and amenities as well as a brief narrative. Each segment concludes with a selection of short and long term recommendations. C. At the July 9 Workshop, staff will present a brief slide show of key Plan provisions. Staff recommends Council discussion and direction on the draft plan so the appropriate items can be prepared and returned to Council for action. 4(e) MEMORANDUM DATE: June 21, 2012 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey B. Adams SUBJECT: RIVERSHORE LINKAGES &AMENITIES PLAN (MF#PLAN 2012-003) The City Council recently approved the Tri-Cities Rivershore Enhancement Council (TREC) 2012 Tri-Cities Rivershore Master Plan, which was crafted for the purpose of encouraging the participating jurisdictions to "develop facilities and programming that face and embrace the river, rather than turning away from it." The ten overarching elements of the 2012 Tri-Cities Rivershore Master Plan are as follows: 1. Improve wayfinding and identity. 2. Integrate and interpret arts, culture, heritage and environmental features. 3. Create "place"through viewpoints, seating areas and user amenities. 4. Enhance water-oriented activities and recreation. 5. Increase birding and wildlife viewing opportunities. 6. Enhance linkages to and from the rivershore, across the river, and through historic downtowns, commerce, and cultural areas. 7. Enliven the rivershore through formal and informal programming. 8. Strengthen the connection with the Yakima Delta and the Yakima and Snake River systems. 9. Re-engage the riverfront through land use. 10. Implement priority rivershore enhancement projects. In response to this plan, staff has assembled a draft Linkages and Amenities Plan which builds on TREC Plan items specific to the City of Pasco. The City's Comprehensive Plan specifies a goal that "All residents of the city are afforded access to the Columbia River." This plan is designed to ensure "Pasco is oriented toward and connected with the River through parks, pathways, bikeways, boat launches and docks." Because the Columbia and Snake Rivers form approximately half of the City's border (approximately 14 miles) it is appropriate to consider the Pasco Rivershore Area the "front door" to Pasco from the vantage of sister cities Richland and Page 1 of 2 Kennewick, and treat the Rivershore Area as a key resource in the ongoing project of cityscape enhancement. The following changes were made to the Plan according to recommendations from the Planning Commission: • General Opportunities: Item #16 dealing with residential development and criminal activity was eliminated • General Constraints: Lack of way-finding signage was added as a constraint. • Rivershore Estates: A reference was added pointing to the Broadmoor Concept Plan which was adopted by City Council. • Columbia View#G: The proposed Columbia View trail along the river was eliminated. • Chiawana Park#H: Proposal for limited seasonal vendors was added • Chiawana Park#H: Proposal for a second boat launch was added • Chiawana Park#H: Proposal for a beach area was added • Chiawana Park#H: Proposal for"Community Center"type structures was added • Chiawana Park Proposed Map: Access Point#3 was eliminated(No ROW) • Wade Park: Proposed beaches added • Underneath Bridges: Restrict access to eliminate "squatting." • Horrigan Farms/Central Pre=Mix: Add Non-Motorized boating area (Near wildlife reserve area?) The Linkages and Amenities Plan is structured with a general amenities section and then broken down into individual sections representing geographical segments, each pertaining to a length of the river with similar characteristics. Each segment has a set of maps showing existing and proposed amenities, as well as a brief narrative for that area. The narratives, in turn, cover ownership, existing landscaping and natural features, transportation and access, general land use patterns, current linkages and amenities, opportunities, and constraints. Each section concludes with a selection of short- and long-range recommendations for that segment. Recommendation: Motion: I move that the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the 2012 Rivershore Linkages and Amenities Plan. Page 2 of 2 • LlnLagc • '� Pan C 1 of ra,5co, Wa,5kington IL F { 4' 'V 7TIk �d ti �� Rivershore UnLage and Amenity Plan City of Pasco,Washington Draft,June 15, 2012 TAF)LE-O CONTF-NT5 INTRODUCTION a) /cope 6) Definitions C) bacLground J) Purpose Guiding Principles e) General Challenges Inventory Concepts a) Ownership k) Landscape 6, Natural Features C) Transportation J) General Land Use Pattern e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory 0 Linkage and Amenities Opportunities v) Linkage and Amenities Constraints h) Phasing,jtrategies—,short/ id/Long 1) Potential Implementation Actions J) Maps & Images Page 2 of 1 1 3 Deknitions Amenities: Pudic conveniences which enhance the River/Trail experience, such as Drinking fountains, restrooms, parks and picnic areas, and boat facilities. Destination: facilities such as recreational areas, community centers, and commercial enterprises which are attractive and enhance the River/Trail experience. Linkage: (5ee upland Linkage River: In this Plan "River" refers to the system of Columbia and Snake Rivers which surround the City of Pasco. Trail: The 5acagawea Heritage Trail winds along the Columbia River around the Tri-Cities area. Upland Linkage:A multimodal transportation route connecting the Columbia River and 5acagawea Heritage Trail to proximal destinations which have the potential of enriching the River/Trail experience. 5coPe andArea The City of Pasco 5horeline Amenities Plan includes all waterfront areas along the city limits of Pasco, extending along the Snake River from the northeastern reach of the City of Pasco's urban Growth boundary (uGF)> near Highway 1 2, south to the confluence Of the Snake and Columbia Rivers at the southernmost point of 5acajawea State Park, and then west and north along the Columbia River to the northern point of the uGPj at Dent Road. This plan is focused on rivershore trails, recreation amenities, community gathering spaces, development opportunities, wayfinding, and connecting to downtown and neighborhood lands, as well as establishing or improving gaps across bridges, natural areas, railway tracks, roads and parks. Jurisdictions and Agencies • City of Pasco — The City of Pasco is the lead agency for and sole proprietor of this Plan. Located along the Columbia River's northern shore, the City of Pasco has many residential neighborhoods that abut the 5acagawea Heritage Trail. • Franklin County - Franklin County is located north of the Columbia River and includes the City of Pasco. ]=ranklin County also has rivershore land in unincorporated areas. Page 5 of i 1 3 • Port of Pasco -The Port of Vasco operates an intermodal rail hub, barge terminal, industrial and business parks in the riverfront area between the Cable bridge and Sacajawea State Park. Osprey Pointe is the Port of Pasco's newest business development protect along the river. • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - The W5. Army Corps of E-ngineers (USACE-) has jurisdiction over use and development standards along the Columbia River. The constructed levees are maintained by the USACL as a flood control tool for the region. Backsround The Columbia and 5nake Rivers form approximately half of the city's korcler (approximately 14 Miles) making the Pasco Rivershore Area the "front door" to Pasco from the vantage of both Richland and Kennewick, and thus the Rivershore Area is a key resource in the ongoing project of cityscape enhancement. Past planning efforts pertaining to the local shorelines, including the City of Pasco Rivershore Area have resulted in a plethora of documents ranging from regional, cooperative efforts to local plans. The following comprise a partial list of documents reviewed in preparation of this plan: 1) TRLC Tri-Cities Rivershore Ma,5ter Plan 2012 2) Comprehensive Plan 2007-2027 3) F)P1C Shoreline Permit;April 2008 4) Parks & Recreation Plan 2005 update 5) broadway Properties Land use and Market Analysis; December 2004 �) Master Plan;5acajawea Heritage Trail: May 2000 7) Tri-Cities Rivershore E_nhancement; 1 997 8) Pasco Rivershore r—nhancement vision Some of the plans are broad in scope and general in their outlook; others are highly focused with measurable outcomes. Page 4 of i 1 3 Project Purpose The 201 2 Tri-Cities Rivershore Master Plan encourages the participatingjurisdictions to "develop facilities and programming that face and embrace the river, rather than turning away from it." `jimilarly, The Pasco Vision of the Comprehensive Plan reads: "All residents of the city are afforded access to the Columbia River. Pasco is oriented toward and connected with the River through parks, pathways, bikeways, boats launches and docks" (Comprehensive Plan; "The Pasco Vision for 2027;" introduction N. The ten overarching elements of the 2012 Tri-Cities Rivershore Master Plan are as follows: i . Improve wayfinding and identity. 2. Integrate and interpret arts, culture, heritage and environmental features. 3. Create "place" through viewpoints, seating areas and user amenities. + E_nhance water-oriented activities and recreation. 5. Increase birding and wildlife viewing opportunities. 6. E-nhance linkages to and from the rivershore, across the river, and through historic downtowns, commerce, and cultural areas. 7. L,nliven the rivershore through formal and informal programming. S. 5trengtken the connection with the Yakima Delta and the Yakima and 5naLc River systems. 9. Re-engage the riverfront through land use. 10. Implement priority rivershore enhancement projects. The Rivershore Linkage and Amenities Plan provides guidance for a coordinated and efficient overall pattern of development in the long term which can maximize benefit for stakeholders, the City of Pasco, and the wider community. It delineates an approach for connecting the public to the jacagawea f tentage Trail and the extensive Columbia River waterfront. It is based on a specific vision with supporting goals and objectives drawn from over 35 years of planning efforts. Project Guiding Principles The primary Goals of this document are to identify appropriate upland linkages to the jacagawea Heritage Trail, city parks, and public access points on the Columbia River, and to provide recommendations on future location of same. Linkages to and from the River/Trail only make sense when they lead to recreational facilities such as parks and Page 5 of 1 15 sports facilities, commercial enterprises such as retail shops, restaurants and hotels/motes, and community facilities such as art galleries, museums, and theaters.Amenities enhance the River/Trail experience and male it a place worth visiting.. The best facilities and amenities are clustered in synergistic relationships and are attractive to local citizens and visitors alike. These amenities are within a comfortable waking distance, and ideally, within sight of the River/Trail. The upland LinLages can 6e promenades, creating a "view portal" for many of these upland attractions. x Page 6 of 1 1 3 General Challenges Wkile each segment of the River/Trail along Pasco's shoreline offers a unique mix of Challenges and opportunities, a few of these challenges/opportunities can be generalized as follows: 1) Way-Finding: The regional rivershore area lacks a cohesive signage and way-finding system;The City of Pasco should work with the otherjurisdictions to create and adopt a cohesive, regional signage and way-finding system. 2) Parking areas for River/Trail access: Access points to trail and River are not sufficient. (Jnless a visitor lives within walking/bicychng distance of the Trai l/River, they need a place to park vehicles. Parking should be integrated into access features. 5) Accessibility from trai%water to commercial amenities: Lew connections exist to link the City's urban areas to the rivershore trail system.Trail users need well-marked, direct, safe and convenient walking and bicycling routes to the water at locations that can serve large potential usergroups. Improving these connections can bring important economic development and transportation benefits to the City of Pasco.A synergistic relationship can occur between commerce and River/Train activity, but only if those commercial amenities are within reach of the River/Trail system. rocus should be on River/Trail planning on an area within easy walking distance (not more than 1/4 mile) from the River/Trail. Projects to consider include improved trail connections between Pasco's urban center and the 5oat 5asin/Marine Terminal area; between downtown Pasco and Osprey Pointe 51-1511-less Park; and between the Pasco urban core area east of -595 and the river area between the Pjlue and Cable F)ridges. 4) Levees: the levees were built to protect the citizens against flood events. However they create a nearly insurmountable obstacle to boaters, waders and anyone desiring general access to the river. The City of Pasco's system of levees creates a visual and physical separation between the rivershore and developed areas. Levee #2 between Wade Park at Road 59 and Ivy Glades should be prioritized as needed trail improvements to establish visual and physical access to the river. 5) Army Corps of Engineers "Wildlife, Management Area": Wildlife areas are desirable for protecting the environment and enhancing biological functionality. However Page 7 of 1 15 overgrown areas adjacent urban areas more often become refuge areas for criminal activity rather than for woodland creatures. With hundreds of miles of river frontage compared tojust a few miles along the City limits, it may 6e wise to rethink how wildlife areas are managed close to urban areas. dements such as public supervision and access need to be addressed. Trails with periodic "lookout" points would serve the dual function of granting public access to wild areas and create better public supervision of these areas. 6) Location/Distribution of current amenities: Amenities attract, and lack of amenities deters visits to the River/Trail. basic amenities relate directly to River/Trail enjoyment, and include, but are not limited to the following: a) Drinking fountains: Walkers, runners, bicyclists, recreationalists and picnicking families, all depend on availability of water. Drinking fountains should 6e placed periodically along the Trail and clustered with park facilities such as pavilions and picnic areas. AMIR, 6) Restrooms: River and Trail users also depend on availability of restroom facilities. Restrooms should be clustered with park facilities such as pavilions and picnic areas, and should 6e stationed periodically in pocket parks along the Trail. c) trade (trees/picnic pavilions): In the semi-arid Tri-Cities area, protection from the summer sun is desirable and adds to the pleasure of the River/Trail experience. Shade areas are severely lacking along the Trail on the Pasco side of the River. Along with tree planting, placement of picnic pavilions is crucial for enjoyment along the River/Trail. Picnic Pavilions would typically 6e clustered with parks and pocket parks. d) benches: The Trail has an assortment of seating areas, although very few of them are coupled with natural or artificial shading. Seating should 6e strategically clustered with both tree planting and pavilion placement areas along the River/Trail. e) Parks: General gathering places are important for increasing social bonds and a sense of community. Parks serve a community purpose in providing some of those meeting places. Parks should 6e designed with high public visibility and supervision so as to reduce the incidence of vandalism and criminal activity.A well-designed park will have houses, apartments and/or condominiums along the periphery, each with park-facing porches and balconies. This design will serve the dual function of Page 8 of 1 15 increasing supervision of park facilities and increasing the desirability and value of park-side homes. 0 Availability of dog cleanup facilities: ror the sake of sanitation, good manners, and aesthetics, canine waste cleanup stations should be Provided Periodically, with City of Pasco dog nuisance code prominently displayed. g) Current residential development along river: One of the main obstacles to linkage and amenities development along the River/Trail will be developed residential areas. Homeowners typically desire parks but resent the higher traffic volumes and intrusion of strangers into their neighborhoods. 7) River Crossings: The Nue and Cade ridges were not designed with non-motorized traffic as a priority, and are severely limited in terms of trail width, accessibility and safety. The effort to provide state-of-the-art separated Class I multiuse paths over them should be explored. MSG Consultants has also suggested exploring the possibility of a cantilevered pedestrian bridge built to the side of the 15N5r bridges to improve the range of river crossing choices for trail users. If a future bridge is built, bike and pedestrian access should be a priority. 8) Railroad: The P)N5F railroad bridge between the 50at p)asin and Marine terminal requires pedestrians traveling along the Rivershore to go around and over it via the Ainsworth Overpass, forcing People away from the water. This also serves to further isolate the 15oat P)asin neighborhood kringing a higher crime and gang risk factor to the neighborhood. Efforts to build a f'jN5F/,5acagawea Trail underpass should be enthusiastically pursued. 9) bridge (Jnderstructure: ridge understructures are targets for graffiti and are periodically used as transient shelters. Landscaping, screening, and other measures should be pursued to discourage access to and vandalism of these areas. General Opportunities FF. i) Provide potential links to commercial and civic districts 2) Improve existing trails and build new trails to patch gaps in trail system 3) incorporate more interpretive 5ignage & informational plaques 4) Encourage more boat and water-oriented activities 5) Commercia l/industrial zoning along river: a) Potential accessibility from trail/water to commercial amenities: Page 9 of 1 15 b) Potential restaurants/eateries/refreshment establishments c) Potential sportinggoods: i) bicycle/roller blade renta l/repair ii) bait and tackle iii) boat iv) Moorin�Q/docLs/slips V) Sales vi) Kental vii) Maintenance/repair AAA Lk viii)fueling J) Potential General Shopping: i) Art galleries ii) Tourist shops iii) Specialty shops 6) Provide self-guided smart phone tours addressing unique history, culture and environment of the Tri-Cities. E_xamples include: Mid-Century House and Historic Alphabet House Tour, Port of Pasco Tour, Environmental Preserve Areas, Tri- Cities bridges and Pompy,'s Lessons trail markers. 7) Guiding development of vacant land along trails a) Pocket Parks in vacant lots along river: Small lots along the path may be suitable for "pocket" park rest areas, areas with minimal amenities for bicyclists and pedestrians and the occasional boater using the Jiver/Trail h) Possible access points to trail: Small }liver/Trail-adjacent lots may also serve as KOW and minimal parking for trail access. c) Possible access points to water 8) Complement Pompy's Lessons trail markers with smart-phone codes. 9) Consider low-profile and night sky sensitive lighting at key gathering spots along the trail for improved safety and visibility 1 o) Develop kiosks and gateway features 1 1) "zero" habitat along levee areas: Levees are constructed with an impermeable core covered with large basalt rip-rap. As the minimum State of Washington/ Department of E_cology requirement for development along rivers is "no net loss of ecological function," permitting for heavier public access and uses should be easier. Page 100f 1 1 3 1 2) broadmoor Area Plan: The Plan for this area west of Road i 00/broadmoor boulevard has been approved by the Pasco City Council. 1 3) Osprey Pointe Plan: The Plan for this areajouth of Ainsworth Avenue and East of the boat basin/urine Terminal has been approved by the Pasco City Council and Phase One is now kuilt. I+) boat basin/urine Terminal Plan: The Plan for this area 5outk of Ainsworth Avenue and East of the Cable bridge has been approved 6y the Pasco City council. 15) Army Corps of Engineers Wildlife Management Area: This stretch of land is under public ownership and can be planned for and permitted as a single entity. i Page i 1 of 1 1 3 jnventory Rivershorejegments The Segments are numbered 1-20, beginning upriver on the Columbia River at the City of Pasco Urban Growth Boundary (UC-35)just north of the Kohler Segment, flowing downstream to jacagawea Park, and then continuing upstream along the SnAe River to the Tidewater Terminal Segment. Lack Segment is an arbitrary DreaLdown of river frontage which contains somewhat similar characteristics ivershorejegments Map below). Inventory of existing amenities The following amenities have been installed e City of Pa- I bore-line to date: 1) Access points 2) beaches 5) F)iLC Path/Tram 4) boat Launches 5) r_nvironmenta%wildlife conservation/protection areas 6) historic markers 7) interpretive ele x 8) Landscaping A 9) Levee Lowering 1 O) Paring areas i i) Part/Sport yields 12-) Picnic areas/Pavilions 1 3) Pubic piers I+) Restrooms 15) Waterfountains Page 12 of l i 3 Kcfer ■1 Dream View l� Pasc anch WI E Q Hor an arms s Col bia View awana Park' Sunset Acres Levy# Wade Park Moo ion fngo Village City of Pasco iew Park e Bri F dge Basin Yid r Port Rivershore Segments ank 2011 Legend Port of Pasco Ainsw 'Yawn 01 Kohler 08 Sunset Acres 15 Marine Terminal Sacagawe ark 02 Dream View ° 09 Levee#2 ® 16 Boat Basin ® 03 Pasco Ranch 10 Wade Park 17 Port of Pasco 04 Harrigan Farms 11 Moore Mansion 18 Sacagavvea Park 05 Rivershore Estates 12 Flamingo Village 19 Ainsworth Town 06 Columbia View 13 Riverview Park 20 Tidewater Terminal 07 Chiawana Park 14 West Cable Bridge Kohler a) Ownership: Private/(J5 Government b) Landscape and Natural Features: The land along this segment is fairly flat, with a short drop-off into the river. The shoreline is thickly vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs. Farming activities occur within about 30 yards of the river.A private unimproved road separates an orchard/vineyard from the river. C) Transportation: There is no direct public access to the River at this segment. The closest public right-of-way is Kohler Road. Wkile the road connects to Dent Road to the South, right-of-way has not been secured to connect the two. J) General Land Use Pattern: 1) Agricultural Areas: Farming activities occur within about 30 yards of the river. A private unimproved road separates an orchard/vineyard from the river. ii) Natural Area: A 20 yard strip of (J5 Government-owned natural area lies between the private road and the River. iii) Preservation of View Corridors: Due to the flat terrain in this section of the River views would he limited to those structures built close to the River. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: None in this segment f) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Public ownership of about 20-30 yards of land along the river would allow the extension of the Sacagawea f jeritage Trail along this section. This section is undeveloped except for farming activities, and may lend itself well to a park/River/Trail access point. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: there is neither direct public access to the River nor secure Right-of-Way from Kohler Road to Dent Road at this time. Roads to the property lead through neighborhoods and are designed for low-volume traffic. h) RE_COMME_NDATION5: Short-Term Recommendations: Page 14 of t t 3 i) Work with Army Corps, the County and Property owners to design and build a continuation of the 5acagawea Trail north to the (Arban Growth P)oundary ((.IGf)) line. ii) Secure the Right-of-way From Dent Road to Kohler Road and purchase land For ROW From Kohler road to the shoreline and For Future park development. iii) Include bona Pile river access points/Future parks along this section of trail which connect to Kohler and Dent Roads. iv) Wjth Property owner approval (and covenant) Pjegin irrigation and tree planting along proposed greenkelt. V) Secure ROW and purchase park property. Long--Term Recommendations vi) Develop a public park with access off of Dent/Kohler r Continue 5acagawea heritage Trail with "pocket" parks along river. �'� WN to �-- �,� _ r _ (ill► `�' �. - i Page 1 5 of 1 1 5 Kohler Proposed Kohler Segment til H N eT w R L ♦ - + ......... S ... 0 30 00 80 120 150 Legend --- Sacanawea Iran Proposed j• ;- _� inow i ii i. UQ �R Cu 0 � - t —r-� yR�uina.arA.rireeeeA�ir�a�Ane w r it i Ae AAA i AAl eA� iRi nAer—e f r if R �, n f r A A A R R Dream view a) Ownership: Private/U5 Government k) Landscape and Natural f=eatures: The land along this segment is fairly flat, with a short drop-off into the river. Area developed with high-end residential units within about 100 yards of the river. The shoreline is vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs. C) Transportation: There is no direct public access to the River at this segment. The closest public rights-of-way are neighborhood streets branching off from Kohler Road. While Kohler road connects to Dent Road to the South, right-of-way has not keen secured to connect the two. J) General Land use Pattern: 1) Residential Development: This area is developed with higher-end residential units in a mix of four sukdivisions and a series of short plats. ii) Natural Area:A strip of u5 Government-owned natural area ketween 20 and 150 yards separates the river from residential uses. iii) Preservation of view Corridors: Due to the flat terrain in this section of the River views are limited to those structures kuilt close to the River. Most River frontage lots have keen developed. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: None in this segment f) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Puklic ownership of about 20-150 yards of land along the river would allow the extension of the 5acagawea heritage Trail along this section. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: there is neither direct public access to the River nor secure Right-of-Way from Kohler Road to Dent Road at this time.Some homeowners have extended their residential landscaping onto public lands. h) RE_COMME_NDATION5 Short-Term Recommendations: Page 17 of t t 3 1) Work with Army Corps, the County and property owners to design and build a continuation of the jacagawea Trail north to the Urkan Growth ff)oundary (UGN line. Oktain KOW for access to the Trail. ii) include bona hole river access points/future parks along this section of trail which connect to ]_ohler and Dent Koads. iii) With property owner approval (and covenant) F)egin irrigation and tree planting along proposed trail extension. Long--Term Kecommendations iv) Greenkelt/parks/pocket parts along river; �kU _ .-a'. Wage 1 8 of i l 3 Dream View Dream View Proposed Segment N N w E f W E ` s S 8 rxxx D 75 150 225 300]T5 Legend .... Sacagawea Trail Proposed e� Y n i Dream View 4 Cross-Section Concept 00 Dream Vierry ��3�e 20 4- 1 1 3 Pasco Ranch a) Ownership: Private/U5 Government b) Landscape and Natural Features: The land along this segment is fairly flat, with a short drop-off into the river. Orchard farming activities occur within about 100 yards (or less) of the river. The shoreline is vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs. The water is fairly shallow along here, and wide shallow areas are periodically exposed during low water events c) Transportation: Court Street runs along the south half of this segment up to Dent Road, where direct access is available to an irrigation pump station and a private dock. Right-of-way has not been secured for either Dent or Court Street in this section. J) General Land Use Pattern: i) Residential Development: This area is developed with scattered farmstead residential units at the periphery of farming activity. ii) Natural Area:A strip of(15 Government-owned natural area ketween 20 and i 50 yards separates the river from residential uses. This area has been designated ky the US Army Corps of Engineers as a "Wildlife Management Area." Hunting is permitted, but no motorized vehicles are allowed. iii) Preservation of View Corridors: There is a slight rise in the terrain in this section of the River, which would allow for suktle views close to the River. A handful of modest homes have been built in a cluster near the river. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: None in this segment 0 Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Dent Road cuts directly inland from the middle of this segment, giving residents of northwest Pasco easy access to the site. As well, Shoreline Road (formerly Court Street) separates the private ownership from the Public lands, reducing the potential for shoreline owner resistance to park and trail proposals. Public ownership of about 20-150 yards of land along the river would allow the extension of the Sacagawea Heritage Trail along this section. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Land along this segment of the River has }peen designated by the Army Corps of Engineers as a "Wildlife Management Area." Page 21 of 1 1 5 Any trail development will go through a strict Army corps review and approval process. h) RECOMME-NDATION5: NOTE—the 5ouMern % of Vasco Kanch is Part of the BroadmoorArea flan and leas been extensive y evaluated and planned ]these recommendations correspond to thatgeneralPlanning effort. Short-Term Recommendations: i, Work with Army Corps, the County and property owners to design and build an extension of the 5acagawea Trail with raised wildlife watching decks on piers as a continuation of the 5acagawea Tram north toward the Urhan Growth boundary ((.ICE)) line. ii) Include bona Pde river access points/future parks along this section of trail which connect to Dent Road and Shoreline Road (formerly Court Street). Long-Term Recommendations iii) GreenkeIVparL,5/pocket habitat areas along river; ".. So r 4`� gage 22 of 1 1 3 �f Y - > Jill lilt]1 ;l3 F 1 r \ s � ' . 1 5 t Page 25 of 1 1 3 P (�'v'v'v'vaQRP... Pasco Ranch - ' Pasco Ranch Amenities , N Segment N W E w E r' 8 t Legend 0 150 340 350 600 750 / !F KkHITAT_AR'EA Fqa[ Aien.�Privelel JG C� Y [v. N j 1. p• i � r § 2 pp Np h _ _.m,m 000 < v nch \a rZ> of11 f" r • rl' Wit Pasco Ranch frric,�atioro Pimps -- r M1 �_-� - i:�,v'✓M�S�� _ "�° re's. r f� It'is Am Page 26 of 1 13 Wildlife Management Area Hunting Permute No Motorized Vehicles For Information Contact: U-S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla [district 201 N. 3rd St- Walls Walls, WA 59362 (509) 527-7136 1 I US Army Corps of Engineers Face 27 of i i 5 Horrigan Farms a) Ownership: Private/(15 Army Corps of Engineers b) Landscape and Natural Features: The land along this segment is fairly flat, with a short and increasingly steep drop-off into the river toward the south. East of Shoreline Road (formerly Court Street) orchard farming activities occur on the north of the City Limits line, and Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation south of the City Limits line. West of Shoreline Road and down to the River the shoreline is heavily vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs. c) Transportation: Shoreline Road (formerly Court Street) runs along the entire length of this segment between the Army Corps of E_ngineers designated Wildlife Management Area to the West and Horrigan Farms Orchard to the East. J) General Land use Pattern: i) Residential ]development:There is one residential unit along this segment. ii) Industrial uses: The Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation has a long- term lease on the land. iii) Natural Area: A strip of Army Corps of E_ngineers-owned natural area between 20 and 150 yards separates the river from residential uses. This area is a Wildlife Management Area. iv) Preservation of view Corridors: There is a slight rise in the terrain in this section of the River, which would allow for subtle views close to the River. A handful of modest homes have been built in a cluster near the river. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: None in this segment 0 Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: 1) Preservation of view Corridors: Views along the Columbia River in the broadmoor area have a strong potential for value-added development. View corridors should be maximized for optimal visual access to the river. ii) S' trong visibility of broadmoor from -i 82 rreeway: The north end of the I- 182 bridge is a majorgateway into the City of Pasco and this section especially Of the 5roadmoor area should be designed and built in such a way as to "put our best foot forward." Page 28 of 1 1 3 iii) Columbia River Natural Character & Recreation: This section of the Pasco Rivershore lends itself well to fulfilling the needs of both recreationalist and naturalist. extending the Sacagawea Heritage Trail should 6e a high near-term Priority, granting foot and bicycle access to the more than 40 acres of designated natural area. boat access via boat launches and docks is an equally high Priority. iv) Mineral Extraction Area: The long-term Plan for the mineral extraction area is to create a boat marina and a mixed-development of retail commercial and high- end shorefront residential units. �n��aa, 9) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: i) Impact of Mining / Industrial Uses: The current gravel mining operation physically separates the upper property from the River. The externalities of a mining operation also have obvious impacts. ii) Local Roadways and Truck Traffic: r�eavy industrial and agricultural traffic negatively impact the area. iii) Physical Separation from the River: Large tracts of agricultural land separate the River from the upper Pjraodmoor area. iv) River Plow / Drift Material: 7 he Pjroadmoor area is at the curve of the Columbia River, and a natural collection area for silt, debris, drift wood and other waterborne materials. A) Kr-COMMr-NDATION5: NOTE-the 5roadmoorArea Plan complete y encompasses the f J/orr�an rarW5 area. The text of the )jroadmoor Area Plan indicates the following for the Hor-gan arms area: QPen 15race --- The government owned Property between the shoreline and,jhoreline Koad leas been designated in the Comprehensive P/an as an open space area. The area is also identified as a critical area geologically and for habitat purposes. Hiking and walking trails through this area would provide for public access and minimal use o)C the area for recreation and public e�joyment of the river. Trails through this area to view points along Me river would support the Comprehensive Plan vision statement dealing with access to the Page 29 of I 15 river. Coordination with tbeArmy Cores ofE ngineers along with shoreline Ofrmits may be necessary for the develofIment of trails in this area." Tlie following recommendations are more foctl5ed e)CKorts within the general)5roadmoor Area flangui (flin(fs: Short-Term Recommendations: 1) WorL with Army Corps to design and build a continuation of the 5acagawca Trail along the river to City Limits line. Work with County and Property owners to design and build a continuation of the 5acagawea Trail to the northernmost Orban Growth P)oundary line. ii) Include bona Pde river access points/future parks along this section of trail which connect to Shoreline road. iii) �jegin negotiations with Army Corps to establish part facilities/raised view decks along river(see link recommendation). IV) With Property owner approval (and covenant) begin irrigation and tree Planting along proposed greenbelt. Long--Term Recommendations v) Improve area for waterfowl and elevated bird watching along the rivershore trail, adding nature trails as needed vi) Greenbelt park/poc6t wildlife preserve areas along river and along main boulevard; VII) Pjoat basin and launch; Possible restricted, non-motorized only boating area near wildlife reserve area. viii) Rivershore commercial development scaled to pedestrian/bicycle traffic. Page 30 of 1 15 Horrigan Farms orrigan Farms Amenities h Segment N r N •13 w E w E S : s 11®n t 1 0 150 .31)11 asn HO 750 13ne[Leunch Fenl y. ® Pt-ea1H.bdtA.. �r t' OL) - .. Cry CD ' v+ V+ • v.. +± ' .P Co a r- 0 M CL J w L i SHORELN e^ r r Page 5 2 of 1 1 3 6)20 92007 1:45 PM N-4;-or r. "' w,' y, �i,' ti��t¢ w,`� ♦r �,. :' 'ale R '?r�S"' y` 4f "•• rier s . ..�� ! �:;� rn* _ r4' t a� •ilr. +�i r s '►N'ii leg ,,� ,� k `�. tf`F mu.-✓x�d �.y:A a ��'`f��" a aF`i`^F t!.:� ��w.r� �'� � � �„'� 3 � '� Y "a ...w a' "„�-,R'1"�Y�e^- �' r yl�- �+..'�' � ��i fy x k ah�•ar��[w ��-�r lT� • f1+Ir:.� •�' '# si' f . 1 � �,A wl AI►A�?9 t 'r�xfi:"e. . c 'Y,. # }�11��y� ��� ��,�y � � _ a if+ w z,' e • 7ea F ip'i 'i Ig i6wo���'�!��i�!'���g�.kA S.$4wxi " .' i 40 ,� t { 414V _ • tF + Fame 33 of i 1 3 ' '..F �•yqY ter/.. -e f , t -Welk : +EI. `x'es in ii d&"jk IS'. "It. •k� �;._ rr K ;4b •r � !-f. - :p a 5 Ak _ l � 3 PO OW ;v E Page 54 of 1 15 Horrigan Fauns Flom a n Farms wren View deck 7�t Richland US Army Corps of Engineers Management Lake Wallula Page 55 of 1 15 Greenbelt Townhomes Along Arterial \ High End Boulevard `\,\ 'View'Housing Butter Medium SF Oriented r.L I7 To River 'High End'River • � � � 'Main Street' Housing - - Civic Feature; Playf elds.Active Park Or Civic Use Regional Retail FHASI?y, `� - Center 'High End'Housing ice-'-°" —. :i Rd.RealIgnment. Interchange Boulevards Commercial Townhomes Greenbelt +� —i Near Retail Improved River Park I a Boulevard Sanditur Pkwy Townhomes I Medium S,F. Condominiums Oriented To River At Boat Basin 11,a t N R, Boat Basin�Marina _ Office Uses -- Near Freeway —_ Public Use. "- Marina.Related School Commercial Center h►- ovS'- .year q-4 o l` W L tz PW- Page 36 4 i 1 3 Horrigan Farms "Lighthouse" At . 8 Page 57 of i 1 5 Rivershore F states a) Ownership: Private/U5 Government b) Landscape and Natural Features: The land along this segment has a steep, -+O-to 50-foot drop into the river. The shoreline is moderately vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs.A high-end, 33-lot subdivision separates the Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation from the River. The development is nearly half built out. C) Transportation: 5koreline Road and Court jtreet run between the gravel pit and the residential area along the river. An unimproved river access road connects jhoreline Road to the River about 300 yards west of the subdivision. J) General Land Use Pattern: 1) Residential }development: A 33-lot high-end subdivision along the river is nearly half built out. ii) Natural Area: A 15-20 yard strip of (J5 Government-owned natural area lies between the residential lots and the River. iii) Preservation of View Corridors: Views are limited Beyond the 22 river frontage lots. IV) industrial Uses: The Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation occupies the majority of the area north of 51-Ioreline Road/Court Street and has a long- term lease on the land. e) Current Linkage and Amenities inventory: A parking area has been installed adjacent the 5acagawea heritage Trail and under the I-i 82 P)ridge. f) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Public ownership of about 15-20 yards of land along the river would allow the extension of thejacagawea Heritage Trail along this section, although the trail cross-section would need to accommodate the steep sloping bank. There exists an unimproved access road and informal boat launch south of Rivershore }give about 300 yards west of the subdivision. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation occupies the majority of the area north of jhoreline Road and Court jtreet and has a long-term lease on the land. Page 38 of 1 15 h) RE-COMMENDATION5-. Short-Term Recommendations: 1) Work with Army Corps, the County and property owners to design and build a continuation of thejacagawea Tram north along this segment. ii) Improve the existing river access point boat launch and add a "rocket" park. iii) begin irrigation and tree planting along proposed greenbelt. Long--Term Recommendations iv) build a Pjoat basin on the current Central Pre-Mix gravel mine. Pjuild the marina as the centerpiece for mixed residential and commercial development. v) Develop area according to the broadmoor Concept Plan adopted by the City. .S i r, - VF RIv —E648 G" OL Cro®e-9eclkrt c.—Pt 'i op 4F - y i RivOrShc+r9 E6t�4WB Pagc )9 of i 13 r Rivershore Estates Segment tf w E 0 "n 7.00 Aso- 600 750 Feel ......�° ID y HAR1RM RD ATERS EDGE DR N w E s Rivershore Estates Amenities Legend L`1 80AT_LAUNCH SACAGAVr.A_TF?AL Page 40 of I 1 j SHORELINE RD wKr IN W E s Rivershore Estates ' IPr osed Legend Sarnaw a Trans Prerwsw _ FarWng Pwpceea 1 b .. 0 Rivershore Estates Pig Farm Page 41 of 1 15 ,r. t I Rivershore Estates River Access across from Central Pre-Mix 6;2 i2OO7 9L. • ' .4b i t � f Page 42 of 1 1 3 Columbia view a) Ownership: Private/(j5 Government b) Landscape and Natural reatures: The land along this segment has a very steep slope profile. The shoreline is moderately vegetated with residential landscaping elements mixed with native and non-native trees and shrubs. c) Transportation: Court Street runs between the riverfront residential area and more upland residential subdivisions. Although an unimproved road leads from Court Street down to a rranklin County irrigation District pump station, there are no bona kde public access points to the Kiver along this segment. J) General Land Use Pattern: 1) Kesidential Development: The entire length of this segment is built out with upper-middle to high-end single-family residential units, with the exception of a couple of vacant lots and a pump station located about 350 yards from the -1 82 freeway bridge. This area also has the highest concentration of private docks in the study area. ii) Natural Area: A slim strip of US Government-owned land lies between the residential lots and the Kiver. iii) Preservation of view Corridors: Views are very limited beyond the river frontage lots. iv) industrial (Jses: A newly installed City potable water filtration plant is located just north of Court Street, next to the 1-182 freeway bridge. The inlet pump for the filtration plant is located under the -182 freeway bridge. The Franklin County irrigation District pump station is located just beyond the south terminus of Koad i i 1 and blocks the shoreline well into the }liver. e) Current Linkage and Amenities inventory: A parking area has been installed adjacent to the 5acagawea Heritage Trail and under the 1-1 ,52 E)ridge. f) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Public ownership between the residential lots and the river averages around 10 yards, with some lots directly abutting the water line. Page 43 of 1 1 3 9) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The jacagawea Heritage Trail currently runs alongside Court Street in this segment. because of the extreme grade, the okstacle of the Pump station, the Proximity of residential lots to the river, and the high number of Private dock facilities, extending thejacagawea Heritage Trail along the river in this section would require both high-order engineering Prowess and strong Political will. It is not recommended that the 5acagawca Heritage Trail kc extended along the Diver in this area at this time. h) Kr-COMMr-NDATION5: Short-Term Recommendations: i) Negotiate with the I=ranklin Count Irrigation District to use the irrigation district land for a view and River access Park with Parking lot. Long-Term Recommendations ii) Add a view Park with Parking and River access on the rranklin County Irrigation District land. mow .. ... f � . -- .a: ,1y L X11 Y^ .�.' '1 mil! A'F• '�' Columbia View _ o B 0 A at 1-102 lMdga e ,0 y Page 44 of 1 1 j �. '"�Ii►#, � ;�; � �� .ice : ��� 1i oaf � ��► ' •,iii - J70 J.'umbia View Segment �i :.. „u ei ♦'% II CL !� 1 tation page+6 - . J. . ss- � j of Chiawana Park a) OWNr.R5hIP: US Government/Local Government leasehold b) Landscape & Natural Features: Chiawana Park is a partially developed community park with two areas of groomed lawns, one overgrown "natural" area, and the balance of the park periodically-mowed weeded areas. c) Transportation: the Park has only one open access point leading through a neighborhood street out to Court Street. There are seven potential access points along the length of the park (See Chiawana Access Points Map). J) General Land Use Pattern: The area is a designated park, although a fraction of it is actually maintained at this point with full amenities. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: (See Amenities Map) 0 Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The Chiawana Park area includes large undeveloped areas with potential fors ynergi.5tic water-dependent and water-related enterprises and amenities. There are six potential access points along the perimeter of the park. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The Park is leased from the Army Corps of Engineers, and as such, requires Corps approval for even the smallest activity. As well, the ParL is surrounded by an established residential neighborhood. All but one of six potential access points are currently closed to puklic traffic. Activating any of the potential access points is Iikely to ke unpopular with adj'acent property owners. h) Kr.COMMr-NDATION5: Short-term Recommendations: i) Clear undergrowth in "natural" area at north end of part (vandalism/gang activity/public safety hazard) ii) Install (more) drinLingfountains iii) Construct more small "family" scale, and large "family reunion" scale pavilions. iv) Identify and develop future riverside dining venues with scenic, recreational or cultural attributes. Page 47 of 1 1 5 v) E-stablish limited, seasonal mobile vendor lease areas for diverse, small-scale vendors near Pavilion areas; include standards for vendor 9ualit_q/aesthetics. vi) Add/Upgrade restrooms vii) Complete landscaping: Lawn,trees viii) Keserve area for a second boat launch. ix) Plan for a beach area. X) Add "Community Center"type structure. MO MO modi" Long--term recommendations: '•. xi) Construct high-end, pedestrian- `micro-village - e space for diverse, small-scale vendors. . xii) Construct second boat launch. xiii)Construct beach area. =fzzzzzi� a Chlawana Park West End Bike Path Page 48 of 1 1 j ,a : , !I 1 � ■ YY ■' 1111111 IY♦� ii'■ �YYYIII� 1111111111 X1111:': �� 11111:1111111111; ��IIIh- � � -�IYFIIIII11i111�Y�■ own 0 0 �' �� ��■� 11111,�11111■11•••,,•,• �:■■■111� 111111.1111 :IIII:C::� ,�1� �� Ilr 'lllalllllllll� ��IIII- �� � ��� 1■='1.111111111■�■ ' f �a°`airii o �� 7 Proposed . . �. x Legend Park Prap-Bd 41 Chlawana Pa Bike Path En at Court Str Page • of ff f �A CMawana Park ��1 Chlawana Ch[arvana Park West Unimproved Area Page 52 of 1 1 j f 1 � .� . R v_ �t PL 4 MOW 4� r K` y _1 Chlawana Park Pavillions a - 'CIIE Chiawana Park ' Columbia River Shallow Area Face 54 of 1 1 5 x _ ffi k* I r C" ti �,���•tit'i..". Yy A.�_- x� �r s.,kC 'k,Y' ,4 # . y s r or 5unset Acres a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers (private ownerships ad,acent) b) Landscape & Natural Features: mostly flat with mix of native and non-native vegetative types. vegetative growth is mostly sparse weeds and pasture grasses, with dense undergrowth and trees along the River. c) Transportation: Access from Court Street via Roads 76 and 84. The jacagawea heritage Trail is built along the entire segment. J) General Land use Pattern: i) Residential: Over 65 yards of vacant Army Corps of Engineers land separates two single-family residential subdivisions (5unset Acres and Ivy Glades) from the River here. ii) Trail Development: The 5acagawea Heritage Trail is developed along the entire length of this segment. iii) Industrial: A maJor natural gas transmission line extends south and crosses the River from the south terminus of Road 76. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The width of this area lends itself to both developed park and pocket wilderness areas. There are shallower areas to the east whiA may lend themselves to beach development. A boat launch could be located near the end of Road 76. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: There are two access points, one from Road 84 and one off of Road 76. Neither has developed parking at this point. view opportunities for surrounding residences are very limited due to the flat terrain and the tree growth along the River. Any activity close to Road 76 would be highly limited due to the presence of the natural gas transmission line. g) RECOMME.NDATION5= Short-Term Recommendations: i) Develop parking facilities at Roads 76 and 84. ii) Install seating areas and drinking fountains at strategic points along the Trail. iii) Plant clusters of shade trees around the seating areas and drinking fountains. Page 56 of 1 15 Medium-Range iv) Develop a Parking area and mid-sized Park at the terminus of Road 76, complete with restrooms, pavilions, and beach area. v) Develop a "Pocket park" with restrooms at road 84. Long-Term Recommendations: vi) Develop the entire width of the Army Corps land with linear park as an extension of Chiawana 'ark, including small, clustered wildlife areas. vii) Investigate the need for another boat lau, npH lKnp CroBSSklbn COnGPi q A sunset Acres Neer[toad 78 Page 57 of 1 1 3 u Acres Sunset Segment �,,, +IE I !I Sunset Acres Amenities ra9c 58 of I 13 �1�■ �■ �� ,ice.. ��' ' �, �# •i• r -F Il � Sunset Acres ' t Proposed T-1 Park Propo�d Parking Proposed Sunset Acres Parking Area at Road 76 s -r v _ Sunset Acres Path to Columbia River HIGH PRESSUAE NATURAL GAS PIPEUNE CROMM 1-aoo-97z-77s Wms s ,eaoeazt : lmrtl lvn MrurY tia P�9� Page 60 of i 1 j i Sunset Acres Ivy Glades Area MIN �nh�uuaQUU. hh '�aa. Sunset Acres Ivy Gladesl Beginning of Levee#2 Page 61 of 1 15 Levee No. 2 a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers (private ownerships ad' acent) b) Landscape &Natural Features:Army Corps of Engineers rip rap levee C) Transportation: There are three developed public access points (Roads 54, 60, and 68) and one access point through a private subdivision (Ivy Glade between the 7200-7400 blocks) to the levee. J) General Land (Ise Pattern: jingle-family dwelling units in the Ivy Glades, Park Estates,Summer's Park,Allstrom view, and Glen Acres Subdivisions. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: There are three developed public access points to the levee. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The levee and drainage canal between the levee and residential development hinder access to Trail and River along this segment of river shore. Wkile the trail is readily accessible at strategic points, access to the water is accomplished only by a careful climb down a steep, oversized rock embankment. Levee height blocks most river views. g) RECOMME-NDATIONS: Short-Term Recommendations 1) Lower Levee;widen path and add landscape features; ii) pipe and fill landward side of ditch at select locations; Iii) Design and build interpretive signage that describes living river concepts as related to shoreline development, such as rivershore management, natural flood processes, and impacts of manmade levees. Long--term Recommendations IV) Fill,grade, and vegetate river face of levee; v) Create parks with "step" access points/boat docks at road 60, 68. vi) Create beach area in shallows between levee and island. vii) Develop strategically sited signature gateway at 1-1 82 & Road 68 Page 62 of 1 1 5 ys ,S � � s q _ 11 t I r ������.�:■■■■ ,,£:E, �,.,>.•.. - ��■nom son on Levee#2 qpMq Amenities Legend _lam r �J Levee#2 Proposed Legend $ocagowa Troll Proposed Beam Pmposed H Park Proparod Parking Pmpused E Y „ Levee No.2 Drainage Canal _ Page 64 of i 1 j _ _jam h-`.• Levee No.2 Ivy Glades Area r t� Levee No.2 Ivy Glades Area Page 65 of 1 15 I o Levee No.2 Road 68 Area f s' Levee No.2 Road 68 Are a Page 66 of 1 13 d � Levee No. 2 - ---, River Vantage Point s: Levee No.2 Access to Road 88 Page 67 of 1 1 3 Wade Park a) OWNER5HIP: Army Corps of Engineers with City of Pasco/rranUin County lease(?) 6) Landscape & Natural Features: gently sloping with park-type vegetation:grass and trees C) Transportation: The Trail is fully developed along Wade Park. Wade park can be directly accessed from River Haven Street off of Roads 39,40, and Road 44, from Road 52, and from Road 54.A boat launch has been developed at Road 54. J) General Land Use Pattern: The land around Wade Park is fully developed with single-family residential units. The boat launch at Road 54 includes paved parking. /mother park extension with parking, restrooms and other amenities is being developed at Road 54. A rough gravel parking lot at the east end of Wade Park between Road 39 and 40 is owned by a private party but has been made available to the public. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The new boat launch at the west end of Wade Park is easily accessible from Court Street via Road 54, and is near a proposed park with existing parking. This area is adjacent to the boat race course and is augmented with temporary commercial refreshment enterprises during the races. More permanent parking pads with power hookups, which would double as pavilion/picnic areas during the off-season, could be installed. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The Trail along Wade Park can get very hot in the summer due to the lack of shade trees; however adjacent neighbors may object to additional tree plantings of these public areas. g) Kr-COMMr.NDATION5: Short-term Recommendations: i) Place water fountains at strategic locations along path; ii) Plant more shade trees in clusters along the Trail; iii) Place canine cleanup stations at strategic locations along path. Long-Term Recommendations: Page 68 of 1 1 3 iv) build restrooms at both ends of the Pak v) jdentify and develop future riverside dining venues with scenic, recreational or cultural attributes. vi) Develop beach area(s), as Practical. 4. i, R Page 69 of 1 13 Aldp- r l 1[ { CI }fY ] Wade Segment w+E 0 251) $00 750 FM ■����I� 111111■ ■ ■ ■� ■■ ■■ � �� � 1111111 •■ �■ .��■■■■■■�■■�:: ,� _ �1111111 ���■ !� '���■■■■��®■��i I` Wade Amenities Legend Q py T H w e S Wade Park Proposed Legend Park Prapased Beach PIOPO%ad Parl-g Pmpased PPtental Habitat Area �a�e 71 i 1 5 Moore Mansion a) Ownership:Army Corps of E ngineers/WA State Dept of Transportation b) Landscape &Natural Features:Army Corps of Engineers rip-rap levee c) Transportation: The Trail extends the length of the Moore Mansion segment; it can only be accessed from }liver Haven Street off of Roads 59 and 40. J) General Land Use Pattern: Levee #1 terminates between Road 39 and 40 next to a rough gravel parking lot at the east end of Wade ParL which is owned by a private party but has been made available to the public. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: As the segment name implies, this path could have direct access to the Moore Mansion, a prominent historic site within the City. Shallow areas in the River and easy river access near the Road 39/40 ParL entrance may lend to construction of a beach in this area. There is a dedicated but as yet undeveloped (Havistad) parl< platted as part of the Amended Pierret's Subdivision south of Havistad Street which could also add to the appeal of this segment. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Due to the levee and the drainage ditch behind, the area is accessible only at one point, a gravel parking area at Road 39/40, which is rather small and is currently under private ownership. There are at present no potable water or restroom facilities at this location. The platted, but undeveloped Havistad park lot is at a considerably lower elevation than the levee, and would not have the "feel" of a riverfront amenity without visual access to the river. As well, it is separated from the River by the levee drainage canal. g) RECOMMENDATIONS. Short-Term Recommendations: i) pipe and fill landward side of ditch; ii) vegetate landward side of levee with grass, shade trees. iii) Fill,grade, and vegetate river face of levee. Long--Term Recommendations: iv) Develop Havistad Park level with levee. Page 72 of 1 15 v) install a keach area at the Road 39/40 Wade FarL entrance, and extending east approximately 100-200 yards. vi) provide state-of-the-art separated Class I multiuse paths over the blue bridge .. .... Page 73 of 1 1 5 Oz ^d a it �7t-14•- Moore Mansion Segment w E S f. 0, 150 300 d50 500 Feel 1J '� O tY ,�_ HAVSTAp S7 ff 7 / w E s Moore Mansion Amenities Legend ® A—Paint Point of Interest B.-h Upland LinYage aPalklop Area &mpwa T-1 Page 74 of 1 15 �. HAVS7AD sr W E S Moore Mansion Proposed Legend S..g-9a TIM ® Parke Mend Linkage Park Preposed OAcres Point Beady Propeeed Mows M.—n ® Pa+klnq Area ° �rx:.s _ ^'T Page 75 of 1 1 3 Flamingo Village a) Ownership: Army Corps of Engineers with City of Pasco/Franklin County lease(?)/City of Pasco. 6) Landscape &Natural Features:Army Corps of Engineers rip rap levee C) Transportation: Access to the Trail is by way of "A" 5trect near the terminus of 25th Avenue. An undeveloped access point also exists at 20th Avenue. The 25th Avenue access point has keen developed as a pocket park with parking but no amenities J) General Land Use Pattern: The west end of this segment lies ad acent to the Llamingo Village Trailer Park. Lurther east is mostly vacant industrially zoned land. The trail is separated from the trailer park and industrially zoned land by a drainage canal and a significant elevation change up towards the levee. The Levee blocks the view of the river and there is no developed access from the Trail down to the water. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: be-cause of its largely vacant nature, this area between the Pioneer Memorial ("Pjlue") bridge and Ed Hendler ("Cable") Pjridge has perhaps the most development potential of all City of Pasco segments. Retail commercial development could conceivably be built over the current drainage canal with ground-level parking and levee-level (and higher) retail, restaurant, entertainment, and water-dependent/water-related uses. jteps could be built down the face of the levee to the river for"toes-in-the-water" access. 0 Linkage and Amenities constraints: Levees are owned and maintained by the Army Corps of L_ngineers.Any development on or around the levees would require complex and time-consuming reviews. g) RECOMMENDATION5: Short-Term Recommendations: i) Pipe and fill landward side of ditch; ii) Rezone the area along the River for Retail Commercial development Longs--Term Recommendations: iii) Lill, grade, and vegetate parts of the river face of levee (see Pasco Rivershore Enhancement vision). Page 76 of 1 1 5 iv) Develop levee top as a wide commercial boardwalk with Periodic River view decks. v) F)uild stair/step access on parts of the River face of the levee down to the water. vi) Allow/encourage retail commercial to build with street-level parking and upper floor shopping, level with, and directly up to the levee,with full levee access. vii) provide state-of-the-art separated Class I multiuse paths over the blue F)ridge viii)Develop strategically sited signature gateway at and 20th & Sylvester C) I v 7 77 f � i3 i ar ML SA i F- FlamingoVillage Segment + 250 500 750 1 P7rL 111111 mil.-- - �� 11111 V1111111tC ■■ � -■, ILJ Flamingo Village Amenities 1 0� Legend y r III '"" i �i.11l ■ 11111 11111 11111 ��"- !11111'■� �® � 11111 11111 � ■�.i� � 11111 i i i`ii•��- ■ i i i•ii-.� Flamingo Village Proposed Legend _�t� 1� 0 Pawq Area Aa- Ilk Nk �i a { f, s w , C1VCT YYW�pfri feN ppirVrrtY.K EcN�gY Riverview Park a) Ownership: Army Corps of Engineers with City of Pasco/rranklin County lease?)/City of Pasco b) Landscape & Natural Features: Army Corps of Engineers rip rap levee; City of Pasco basebal l/softball facility; City of Pasco Riverview Park. There is a shallow, manmade drainage pond to the west of the park. C) Transportation Access to the Trail is by way of "A" Street from an undeveloped access point at 20th Avenue, and between 1 7th and 1 sth Avenues through the City Of Pasco basebal l/softball field and Riverview Park. A loop of the Trail circles around near the Animal Shelter at 1 St' Avenue. A E)NSr rail spur crosses "A" Street, curving south along the ball fields and loops east roughly parallel to the river. This rail spur is currently being utilized by a single client, a small concrete company leasing land at the Port of Pasco. The spur will be abandoned when the lease expires. J) General Land (Jse Pattern:This area is developed with an animal shelter, a City of Pasco basebal%softball field and Riverview Park. C) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: This is one of the few areas not locked out Of potential "destination" development by residential zoning.The area south of"A" Street could be enhanced with river-oriented commercial uses, augmenting the developed park and sports facilities. The manmade pond has potential for wildlife viewing, fishing for young families, and should be enhanced as park land with grassy areas, pavilions, restrooms, pond access and barbecue amenities. There is potential for a pocket wildlife area as part of the pond-centric development. Once the PjNSr rail spur is abandoned the City should negotiate with the E)N,5r to acquire the land adjacent to the ball fields. This area could benefit from additional baseball fields and the addition of soccerfacilities. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints:The area is still zoned I-1 Light Industrial, and as such can be legally developed with such things as building material storage yards, trucking companies, a central power station, automotive assembly and repair facilities, and blacksmith,welding or other metal shops. g) RECOMMENDATIONS: Page 80 of 1 i 3 Short-Term Recommendations: i) Rezone the area south of"A"Street as C-i Retail Commercial. ii) improve Riverview Park for waterfowl and elevated bird watching along the rivershore trail, adding nature trails as needed; Develop a parl< around the pond with a Pocket wildlife viewing area, fishing areas for young families, grassy areas, Pavilions, restrooms and barbecue amenities. iii) Place drinLingfountains, shade trees, and restr acilities at strategic Points; Long-Term Recommendations: ' iv) rill,grade, and vegetate river face of. (see Pasco Rivershore Enhancement vision. V) Purchase the 5N5r lands east of the ball fields; add baseball and soccer fields. Vi) Develop a beach areajust south of the Riverview ParL. a PAScO R1V"SHORE ENILAkCT NFNT VMOON _~- f 5 � INS-- pi I 1 Page 8 1 of i l j Riverview Park Segment `' T w E S u aog zgn ;w,r� aoo smr Feel `A"ST m �k ASyINGr 2VIEW PA I F - `ti Riverview Park Amenities Legend ACS Pow Work Y�Y, Reshoom N jrc,J E.-h ® Parki-Area Upland l,lnk®ge W + E D—kl rg F.�Mwn 6"1 M.N.Table S"—T-1 E Fame 8 2 0f 1 15 - "A"ST _ -- Shl,y 51' -_ - Riverview Park Proposed li�I X11 Legend secag—ea rrag Parks N _ Mend Linkage Park Prep4sed OAcres Pant Beady Prepesad E - ® Pa,kuq Area r� 1R Ali- IL 'w� '" R` +�►�' 4: `t. ti's'. .- -4 1y y�I Page 8 3 of 1 1 3 West Cable F)ridge a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers b) Landscape & Natural Features: Army Corps of E_ngineers rip-rap levee; E)N5r Railroad spur line; undeveloped scrub land. c) Transportation: A E)N5r Rail spur bisects most of this area; One unfinished access point leads to 13th Avenue. The trail leading to i 3th crosses bNSF land and the Mss rail spur. J) General Land Use Pattern: This area is mostly vacant with some residential and industrial uses along Washington Avenue, extending south towards the River. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: 5ecau5e this area is mostly undeveloped it has more flexibility for future plans. it is close to the ballpark and Riverview park and could eventually ke an extension of and expansion area for that facility. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The ff)N5r-owned rail spur is a prominent and central barrier to any development in this area. (Jntil the spur is abandoned and the land changes hands this area is essentially off-limits to any redevelopment. g) RE-COMMENDATIONS: Short-Term Recommendations: i) Acquire PjNl5F land upon rail spur abandonment. H) pipe and fill landward side of ditch; Long-Term Recommendations: III) Fxtend park facilities east,with picnic areas and typical park amenities. iv) Fill,grade, and vegetate river face of levee (see Pasco Rivershore Enhancement vision). V) provide state-of-the-art separated Class I multiuse paths over the Cable F jri dge Page 84 of 1 15 lift r R 4 West Cable Bridge ` - Segment N is W E S 1 -b 1 oio 200 104) ana 5r�t F-I 4 tea.` P w,, H� GT i r' R lw m West Cable Bridge Amenities Legend LALCM POW ® Picnic Table 9....h Upland Unk.ge Kwsk Proposed Upww Unkagle ® Park+n6 Area $ACACAMkTRAIL Page 85 of i 1 3 A t West Cable Bridge Proposed 0 Legend $acapawea Trait Parks UplaW Linkaga Park Prapo�M 1pflaad_okago_Propo ed 13-0 Prw—od Aca Pant Parking Area YA - I 3 4 e J1 _ I 1I tI Page 86 of 1 1 3 Marine Terminal a) Ownership: Port of Pasco/some private b) Landscape & Natural reatures: Army Corps of E-ngineers rip-rap levee; commercial/industrial area (mostly vacant—marine terminal side); P)NSF railroad main line and trestle bridge to the east; 5acagawea trail does not connect former Port of Pasco marine terminal with boat basin area due to bN5F Railroad tracks and trestle bridge. c) Transportation: The Trail extends through the entire length of this segment. Access is from I Oth Avenue, Washington Street, 9th Avenue, Ainsworth Avenue, andth 4 Avenue. J) General Land (jse Pattern: Mostly vacant industrially zoned land. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The Trail extends through the entire length of this segment. There is a barge dock which would ke an excellent location for an indoor/outdoor waterfront restaurant with integrated dock facilities. Kctail commercial development should ke built with ground-level parking and levee-level (and higher) retail, restaurant, entertainment, and water-dependent/water-related uses.This is another prime potential retail commercial area. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: This is the site of a former WWII fuel tank facility.Some toxic spillage has occurred along the west end of the Marine Terminal area and is in the remediation process. (Jnfortunately, the remediation is "low-tech" and thus more time-consuming. The area may not ke "shovel-ready" for some time. An anxious developer may choose to invest in a more intensive (and expensive) remediation process, but this is not a current likelihood. The two available direct north-south routes from this neighborhood to downtown Pasco are 4th Avenue under the Ainsworth (Jnderpass, and north along the bN5F main rail line to the City Center; and north on I Oth Avenue. While both routes are fairly well 5idewalk- e9uipped for pedestrians, however neither is designed for bicycle traffic. As well, neither route is aesthetically pleasing. g) KE_COMME_NDATIONS: (see boat basin/Marine Terminal Master Plan). 2) Short-Term Kecommendations: Page 87 of 1 1 3 i) Rezone the area for business FarL/Commercial retail. 3) Long-Term Recommendations: i) Invest in higher-tech toxic spill remediation ii) Encourage/Promote development as Per the boat tjasin/Marine Terminal Plan. iii) Fjuild an improved tram connections between Pasco's urban center and the Fjoat basin/Marine Terminal area iv) Consider the possihility of a cantilevered pedestrian bridge bunt to the side of the 5NSF bridge v) Develop strategically sited signature gateway at 4th Ave & Lewis 5t VI) Identify and develop future riverside dining venues with scenic, recreational or cultural attributes. Ak- 11 ?M"P*M A7 $iFaii!undercrossing o" �• Public lreac Columbia River View Point _ Er�hBcsd 6cf�f launch, -� wing,and access Ww marina park 3 { Page 88 0� i 1 3 ' r 0/' - Moir; J9 �. Marine Terminal -• ° T Segment w E S 0 1010 240 3010 400 34g i feet r rw W Marine Terminal — Amenities Legend 'J Access.Pwnt EACAGAVJEA_TRAIL IN` B.-h S—gawea_Tral_P.I:o%@d w E WI_ ReW,w S Page 89 of i 13 n f - r77 SL(.i Q r•�_ Marine Terminal Proposed - —� 0 Legend $a-g—Trail Parks - - Lpllaad Linkage Park ProposM N LtPlood Lnkago Promed Beach Proposed Rmlorond Parking Proposed E Access Pant Caltnerraal Prwp m Fir— u I Page 90 of 1 13 boat basin a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers with City of Vasco ease/Private owners b) Landscape & Natural Features: Army Corps of E_ngineers rip-rap levee and dike; commercial/industrial hoat marina area and boat launch and JocL in disrepair; L)N5r railroad main line and trestle bridge to the west, separating the Port Marine terminal from the boat basin; 5cklaglc City park; modest residential areas; boat launch in disrepair, private marina facility; 5acagawea trail does not connect former Port of Pasco marine terminal with E)oat basin area, due to F)N5r Railroad tracks and trestle bridge. C) Transportation:This area is barricaded in by the 5N5F Railroad main line to the west, The Ainsworth Overpass along the north, and the Port of Pasco's Osprey Pointe protect to the east. Access is from 2"j and Gray avenues to the northeast, and a foot access from the Osprey Pointe development to the east. 5incc the construction of the Ainsworth overpass this area has become further isolated and less accessible, as the overpass cut off access from Railroad, 4th, and 3rd Avenues. rurthermore, thejacagawea Heritage Trail does not go through this area, instead winding north across the overpass avoiding the F)oat Basin neighborhood, and then back down along the river at Osprey Pointe. Neighbors have reported that crime is higher here because the area is isolated from public supervision. J) General Lana use Pattern: A private marina operates in the industrially zoned waterfront area, next to a public boat launch and a public park. Modest residential units occupy the residentially zoned north half of the area. A large percent of these units are owner-occupied and are neatly maintained. There are a few industrially zoned lots in the east part of the neighborhood. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: A neighborhood park is already in place, with a boat launch close by. This basin lends itself well to development of a separate beach/swimming area. However the beach should be designed in a way as to separate swimming and boating activities. if the P)NSF Railroad would allow a trail underpass for thejacagawea Trail under its main line, the Trail could continue through the neighborhood, opening up the neighborhood somewhat and adding public supervision to the area. As the Osprey Pointe project develops to the east, this area will be in higher demand for upscale residential development and an Page 9 1 of 1 1 3 upgrade will ke warranted to the marina facility, with demand for mini-market, boat fueling,fishing supplies, and perhaps restaurant facilities at the marina. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The F)N5F Railroad has been reluctant in times past to allow for an underpass under its mainline, citing transportation security issues. As well, the Port of Pasco is reluctant to include the boat 5asin in its plans as long as the neighborhood remains unsightly and uninviting to business visitors. The high owner-occupied ratio reduces the likelihood of any major upgrades to the residential neighborhood in the short-term, although as land values in the neighborhood increase due to Osprey Pointe development, owners may kc induced to sell for a reasonakle profit. There are no direct north-south routes from this neighborhood to downtown Pasco. The closest access would require a circuitous route either west along Ainsworth Avenue and south at 6th Avenue, thence circling east and north to 4th Avenue under the Ainsworth Underpass, and north to the City Center; or east to Oregon avenue, north to Lewis 5treet, and west again to the city Center.The former route navigates through industrial and residential areas, the latter primarily through industrial -zones on a truck route that is not hike/pedestrian friendly. g) Kr—COMME.NDATON5- (see boat basin/Tank Farm Master Plan) `jhort-Term Recommendations: 1) Rezone neighborhood to higher-density residential, to allow for higher-end condos. E-staklish design standards for all new construction compatihle with the Marine Terminal and Osprey Pointe themes. ii) begin negotiations for a 15N jF/jacagawea Trail underpass. Prepare a "plan b" "floating deck" option for the trail to drop into and floats on the River, if necessary. iii) begin plans for continuation of the 5acagawea Trail through the neighborhood. iv) begin plans for a public beach separated from the boat launch facility. V) (Jpgrade dike and park facility. vi) Add path and view deck at harbor entrance of dike. Page 92 of 1 15 Long-Term Recommendations: vii) build 5acagawea Trail underpass and tram through the boat basin neighborhood. viii build a beach and swimming area as part of 5cklagel ParL, separating koat launch uses from swimming. ix) (Jpgrade boat launch and dock facilities. x) build a park along the River between the basin and Osprey Pointe,P. thematically connecting the two developm xi� Consider the possibility of a cantile pedest i idge built to the side of the 5N5F kridge 1J I>n r s. 9 3,n A,- LA4,ij c H C1Gt�t OF a, IMPzc)"v* f I Page 95 of i i 3 Boat Basin ` Segment - N - 7 imp% .. o 100 aoo aoo aoo smo .* AQ • • •, A d N w w E S C} SCh G-EU DIRK j C7 r Boat Basin _ Amenities Legerrii Access PNM k 1-1.1 c Marker ® Restroam 13—h fl Parking Area SAGAGAWEA_TRAL l°.–"J', Beer ieurarlr El Pier SaoKpoiw Trill Propow l Page 94 of i 1 3 =-EM `!' �•�"'art. ■ 0 w�rd�� s_• ' ._- - Port of Pasco a) Ownership: Port of Pasco b) Landscape & Natural Features:gently sloping to increased slope, scrub vegetation with thick tree growth along river edge (NOTE.—Trees have recently keen thinned around the Osprey Pointe development to the west. C) Transportation: The port of Pasco is a huk of industrial Klver, rail, and truck transportation.The Port owns a karge docking and loading facility on the Columkia Jiver, which leads out to the Pacific and to markets in the Pacific Kim and beyond. This karge facility is located just east of the Osprey Pointe development. Several rail-spurs access the E)N,517 main lines through the Port from koth the northwest and northeast. Ainsworth and Oregon Avenues provide quick access for trucking to major highways heading in all directions. The Trail has keen developed through the Port property; along the river of the Osprey Pointe area and then inland along Ainsworth Avenue to the last klock of warehouses, and then kack south to the river. The Trail ends at the,5acagawea jtate Park access road. J) General Land Use Pattern: The Port of Pasco has a mix of WWII-era warehouse facilities and vacant lands, and is zoned for heavy industrial use, thought Osprey Pointe is planned as a higher-end kusiness park. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The completion of the first Osprey Pointe kuilding (the Port of Pasco office) and utilities infrastructure has set the stage for further office development in the park. The Port has designed the kuilding as an example of the design standards expected of future buildings on the site. Landscaping (including the removal of dead trees and undergrowth along the Jiver) is professional and aesthetically pleasing, as well as drought-resistant. The rest of the Port will remain heavy industrial into the foreseeakle future. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Trail location is constrained by industrial uses in the area. The Trail currently follows Ainsworth Avenue through the heaviest industrial use areas, leaving the river to avoid the karge loading facility and some outdoor warehousing. One river view access trail weaves ketween some outdoor storage areas down to the }liver, kut does not 5u6sequentlyjoin up with the Trail. Page 96 of 1 15 g) Kr—COMMENDATION5: (see Port of Pasco Osprey Pointe 51-1s11'Ie55 Parr Plan). Short-Term Recommendations: 1) Continue development of Osprey Pointe as planned. ii) Connect Lookout Point tram to main Tram along the River. iii) Provide self-guided smart Phone tours addressing unique history, culture and environment of the Port of Pasco; Highlight big Pasco's working Port and businesses as a tram exhibit Long--Term Recommendations: iv) ff)uild a Park along the River between the 5oat 5asin and Osprey Pointe, thematically connecting the two developments. v) Fjuild an improved trail connection between Pasco's urban center and the Osprey Pointe F)usiness ParL. Page 97 of 1 13 A' >• I ,p Port of Pasco Segment J N W E 4� S 0 Ed7®00 ^..� F M w E S , Port of Pasco Amenities � Legend � Pecs ss 1-1 IrRarpr t-Mark— ® Pirr Upl.M Lmkrgr + hence resk a Rant— Secag—.Tree F�p,+. Pot.0.1 HOW A.. ® ,,—QAI" • VIEW_POINT Sxxg—Trad Prep .4 L� 'a Hist—Mauer T.Ile PI UDwkaPuMcy _. Pale 98 of i 1 3 1= Proposed Port of Pasco Legend ragc of 0 o jacagawea Park a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers/Washjt Parks & Recreation b) Landscape & Natural Features: 5tate park; mostly flat, mix of native and non- native (parQ vegetation; beach areas; docks; boat launch; historic Ainsworth Town site. c) Transportation:Access to the Park is limited to a single two-lane road entering the park from the northwest. The Trail ends at this road. An undeveloped path/road meanders through the historic Ainsworth town site. J) General Land Use Pattern: This area is partially developed as a state park with patron amenities such as parking, family and group picnic areas, a koat launch and docks, and a beach. There is housing for park staff and a museum/interpretive center. The balance of the park is vacant, with the exception of some high voltage- power lines utilities crossing the Columbia River at the south shore. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: 5acagawea5tate Park is partially developed and contains the only developed peach within Pasco city limits. This park rests at the confluence of the jnake and Columbia Rivers and is historic for its role in the Lewis and Clark L,xpedition, and contains a museum and interpretive center. The park is periodically used for sternwheeler riverboat docking as they come up river from the Pacific coast. While this may ke an ideal site for summer food vending, any commercial activity would need to he sanctioned ky the jtate Parks ]department. The Park isjust south of the historic Ainsworth town site, and the only public access to the site. Thejacagawea Trail should continue through the park along the north border of the access road and developed park areas, continuing along the meandering Ainsworth access road, and then north up along the Snake River. Many areas of the park are ideal for local camping and scouting/wilderness club-type activities. The balance of the park area is undeveloped and amenable to wildlife viewing. Future development should allow for a few "look but don't touch" viewing trails in appropriate parts of the park. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: because the park is owned and operated by the State Parks }department, the City of Pasco has limited influence over its development. As well, the Ainsworth town site is an historic site and may he difficult Page 100 of 1 15 to protect as an archaeological site, off-limits to scavenging. The northeast part of the old town site is swampy and any tram through the area may require footkridges or boardwalLs to cross over the swamp areas. g) KE-COMMENDATION5: (sate of Washington Parks Department); Short-Term Kecommendations: 1) Place drinLing fountains, shade trees, and restroom facilities at strategic points; ii) Develop overnight camping areas throughout the park iii) Design a tram extension of the 5acagawea Tram through the Ainsworth Town site and beyond. iv) Develop trams in 5acajawea State Park for opportunities to learn akout native Wildlife,geological features and the Confluence Project V) Consider more summer fairs and activities and related food vendor opportunities Long--Term Kecommendations: vi) Develop thejacagawea Heritage Tram through park and towards the Columbia Plateau/Ice Harkor Dam tram linLage; AL r 4: ,f $6 Page 101 of 1 15 J r ,.. �• s i b; Sacagawea Park } Segment ."Ys 0 100 600 400 1200 F. Y N 5 SacSeg ea Park Segment =' Page 102 of 1 15 l• I' N yy E s Sacagawea Park Proposed Legand S2cag-u Troll y Ac[:ess Phial - Sacag—Trail Proposed Upland Linkage PolemBal Hahim Araa Parks Parlang Area Re�lwoad '� �ry�� a 54��7: Page 1 03 of 1 1 3 Y � t 0 IT 1 Page 104 of 1 1 3 tr^ 'J, Building U do Nature- f F..arfv inhabitants along the Snake and Columbia rivers lived in lodges _. constrtrcted of isaod and covered with we mats. Woad far frames was seance in the days when sage and willonw dominated the river shorn and no trees grew an the acid plains. Natisv Americans ironsport"tl the poles from forested areas on the distant hills,or collected them as drlflwoad. In recent times,Columbia River dams and irrigation systems allow tall trees am green grass to flourish in the owe-arid landseape t - 4 Holice - kelp preserve the past far- the future. ; Disturbance or removal of y artifacts is prohibited. �1 Violators are subject to � fine and imprisonment. iN IRS r Ainsworth Town a) Ownership: U5 Government b) Landscape & Natural Features: steep slope areas, bN5F R-O-W with trestle bridge; overgrown with mostly non-native vegetation, salt deposits and marsh/swamp areas c) Transportation: There are no direct public access points to this point. An undeveloped, meandering path extends north from 5acagawca 5tatc Park to the site. J) General Land Use Pattern: Vacant with an undeveloped archaeological site from the former Town of Ainsworth. e) Linkage and Amenities OPPortunities: The Ainsworth Town site could he developed as an historic site. The undeveloped path which winds through the site could easily kc developed into an extension of the jacagawea Trail as it converges with the Columkia Plateau trail along the Snake }liver. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Much of the proposed Trail path Iles in Railroad right-of-way. Any trail development would ke dependent upon vacation of existing rail uses and cooperation of the railroad. g) Kr-COMMr-NDATION5: h) Short-Term Recommendations: i) begin conversations with the jtate Park jervicc and FW517 Railroad. ii) Plan and design ajacagawea Heritage Trail extension through the Ainsworth Town site. i) Long--Term Recommendations: 1) continue Sacagawea path towards Ice Harbor Dam trail Iinkage; ii) place drinking fountains, shade trees, and restroom facilities at strategic points; iii) Develop Town of Ainsworth archaeology site iv) Consider the possibility of a cantilevered pedestrian kridge built to the side of the P)N5r bridge Page 107 of 1 15 r� r. N r� N J' `,� 'ter .:�•_ r Ainsworth Town yf �." Ainsworth Town Segment Segment c'•,' Legand r 'Y i.` I �.11� 9wOLauach ® Parking Area Pg&WjalH bd.t Area Rler 4n S ♦ ❑ 100 7❑O 309 4.00 500 Saco�awe 7 Rra;aaea 3he0.er faa9 7W �J L x ,, a/ i . r♦ ♦ i ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • • r r O 0 .r N v+ W E s Ainsworth Town Proposed Legend 13 S—g-7,..'il Popp—d r Potential Hl bftalA— Parinng Nen l� r Parks Rail—I TidewaterTerminal a) Ownership: P)NSF Railwac�/Tidewater Terminal Compan�/Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 6) Landscape & Natural Features: Steep slope; M517 R-O-W ; industrial uses; US-12 highway and bridge C) Transportation: There are no public access points to any portion of this segment. Plans are being considered to connect Sacajawea State Parl< with the Columbia Plateau Trail (CPT) Currently two existing, off-site fuel tank farms prevent a direct link between CPT and the park. While the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission owns the former ff)N5r Railroad ROWjust north of the Tidewater terminal, the Southern part of CPT to Ice Harbor has yet to lie developed and the trail still has railroad tracks and is used for railcar storage. The Washington State Department of Transportation (W5DOT) is scoping a project to build an interchange over highway i 2. The current W5DOT plans include a bridge wide enough to include a bike lane. One potentially indentified route would follow Sacajawea Park Road up to the bridge and a route would have to be identified to connect from the bridge to the Southern end of the Trail. J) General Land (Jse Pattern: this area is developed with two fuel storage tank facilities, with the balance of the land being vacant. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Plans are being considered to connect Sacajawea State Park with the Columbia Plateau Trail (CPT). The Washington State Parl<s and Recreation Commission owns the former 5N5F Railroad ROW just north of the Tidewater terminal. W5DOT is scoping a project to connect Sacajawea Park to the CPT via Sacajawea Park Road up to an interchange over highway 1 2, including a bridge wide enough to include a bike lane. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Two off-site fuel tank farms prevent a direct link between the Columbia Plateau Trail and the park. While the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission owns the former 5N5F Railroad ROW just north of the Tidewater terminal, the Southern part of CPT to Ice [- arbor has yet to be developed and the trail still has railroad tracks and is used for railcar storage. Page 1 1 0 of 1 1 3 g) RECOMMENDATIONS: Long--Term Kecommendations: i) Continue the 5acagawea Trai l/Columbia Plateau Tram towards the Columbia Plateau/Ice Harbor Dam tram linkage; ii) Install JnAing fountains, shade trees, and restroom facilities at strategic points; iii) Consider the possibility of a cantilevered pedestrian bridge bunt to the side of the ff)N5I=kridgc AIA I w h 4y E Page i l i of 1 1 3 - ��J � - � ~ � ��)6��: - � ■ «.C� ` » � y � � �� • CA EL\ ) o CL § L =a . ^a � { � $ ) _ 2-4 5�1-® ■ � ~ » . rage 112 o 113 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Counc' TO: Gary Crutch ty Manager Rick Terway, ' t r A &CS FROM Dunyele Mason, Financial Services Manager SUBJECT: Meter Reading Contract I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Memorandum to City Manager. 2. Contract for Meter Reading and Related Services and Exhibit A June 29, 2012 Workshop Mtg.: 7/9/12 Regular Mtg.: 7/16/12 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 7/9: Discussion 7/16: MOTION: I move to approve the contract for meter reading services with Columbia Meter Reading, Inc., and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract documents. III. FISCAL IMPACT: A. The current contract with Columbia Meter Reading, Inc. (CMR) expired in March 31, 2012. Peter Lemieux, Vice President of CMR, has stated the company would extend the now expired contract for 3 additional years with a decrease in their per unit fees for regular meter read services if the city switched from obtaining reads every second month to obtaining reads every month. B. The City paid CMR approximately $210,000 for their 2011 services. This includes routine meter reading, meter turn ons and turn offs when a customer moves in or out; delinquent turn ons and offs due to delinquent amounts owing (including after hours), confined space readings and requested re- reads. The staff at CMR is virtually on -call 24/7. They also respond to emergency shut offs where a customer has a pipe break or is working on the plumbing. The estimate for 2012 including the switch to monthly meter reading is $319,500. This contract increases customer service to provide accurate billing information every month for an estimated additional cost of 52 cents per month per customer. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. The city has contracted with CMR for meter reading services for the past 12 years. This contract expired March 31, 2012. Staff last advertised in January 2005 for Request for Proposals for meter reading services. Only CMR responded to that request. B. There are currently approximately 17,600 water meters to read. In 2000 there were approximately 9,000 meters. All water meters are currently read once every two months. The account usage is estimated for billing purposes in the non -read months. The proposed contract includes reading meters every month. V. DISCUSSION: A. Mr. Lemieux was employed by a previous contractor prior to being awarded the contract 12 years ago. He resides within the city limits of Pasco. He has demonstrated a history of high performance by notifying staff, on many occasions, when he or his staff notice illegal water connections. B. He and his staff do an excellent job reading meters. Over the past year CMR's reading accuracy rate has been 99.87 %. C. The attached memo indicates that hiring City employees to do the job would not be as cost effective as continuing to contract with CMR for the next three years. D. Staff recommends the approval of the new contract with Columbia Meter Reading, Inc. which includes a lower regular meter read rate. MEMORANDUM DATE: June 15, 2012 TO: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager THROUGH: Rick Terway, AC &S Dire cto# FROM: Dunyele Mason, Financial Services Manager Tll�� RE: METER READING CONTRACT Background. The meter reading contract ran from April 2009 -2011 and the one year extension provided in the contract was exercised which extended it to March 31, 2012. Columbia Meter Reading, Inc. is continuing to provide service on a month to month basis until a new contract is put into place. The delay in implementing a new contract was to provide time to research alternatives including ways to reduce costs and to evaluate the potential of moving to monthly meter reading in a sufficiently cost effective manner. Alternatives. Five alternative approaches were considered. 1) Status Quo — Contract services reading every other month; 2) Contract services reading every month; 3) Establishing a city meter reading unit reading every other month; 4) Establishing a city meter reading unit reading every month and 5) implementing electronic meter reading services reading every month. Estimated cost data is presented in the attached table. Results. A comparison of alternatives indicates that reading meters every month rather than twice a month will not cost twice as much as the status quo as one might first assume. This is because there is a certain amount of volume savings involved with switching to monthly reads. The Contractor is willing to sign a three year contract that reflects that discounted cost to the city. Thus the switch to monthly meter reading can be accomplished at just about half again ($109,500) as much as the current cost ($210,000). This works out to an additional amount per monthly bill of only $0.52. Benefits. There are many benefits to be gained for the $0.52 per month: • Tiered rates. Moving to monthly rates now provides the data to move to tiered consumption rate setting two years from now thereby supporting policy decisions to conserve water. Charging a tiered rate on an estimated bill is problematic. Monthly reads would provide actual (undisputed) data in order to hold the customer financially accountable for their actual water use. Customer service — bill info. Many customers are confused and frustrated with our water bills which are wrong (by definition) every single month. The estimated month does not show actual water use and the following month with an actual read is also wrong as that month's consumption adjusts for the error in the previous month's estimate. Thus the customer does not see on any monthly bill what the actual water use. Further the history consumption graph information is also wrong for the same reason. Customer service — leak detection. With estimated water bills it can be several months before a water leak or unusual water use is detected. With monthly reads, leaks and problems can be detected and reported much sooner. Meter reader time savings (cost savings to the city). Meter reader hand held devices contain edits that require meter readers to re -enter reads if the read is outside of certain parameters. Having checked with the manufacturer, these edits are in place to prevent misreads and do not have a way to be turned off. The city has set the devices at maximum tolerance and yet many months the meter readers are required to enter the read twice instead of once (or more if they punch a number in wrong during one of those two times). If actual reads were used them the tolerances and edits would work as designed and only kick in when something was really wrong. Estimated reads slow the meter reading process. Recommendation. The contractor is willing to sign a three year contract with a reduced per meter bill rate if the city moves to a monthly read process and allows for alternative vehicles (such as Segways). If the city remains status quo, the contractor is willing to sign a three year contract at status quo contract rates. The cost of providing services internally has large start up costs and with other priorities, this would not be the best time to implement a change. The use of electronic reads is likely to produce a lower cost monthly read delivery system but is not currently in place or available. As electronic reading is likely to be the lowest cost delivery system then progress should continue to creating a procurement and implementation plan to install electronic meters as part of the meter replacement program. As this option is not currently in place, in order to increase customer service, provide accurate billing information and start collecting the data that can be used to implement a future tiered water consumption rate Finance recommends entering into a three year contract for external meter reading services and move to a monthly meter reading process. Cost Comparison -1 nternal /External /Electronic And Monthly Reads vs. Reads Every 2 months Route Reads Re -Reads Vault Reads Ons & Offs After Hours TOTAL Route Reads Re -Reads Vault Reads Ons & Offs After Hours TOTAL Route Reads* Re -Reads Vault Reads Ons & Offs After Hours TOTAL Contracted Reads Every Reads Every 2 months 1 Month Difference Annual Annual Annual Per Read 148,163 252,502 104,340 3,472 1,736 (1,736) 6,845 13,690 6,845 38,813 38,813 - 12,745 12,745 - 210,038 319,486 109,448 0.52 Internal Reads Every Reads Every 2 months 1 Month Difference Annual Annual Annual Per Read 181,631 290,609 108,978 32,290 32,290 6,373 6,373 - 220,293 329,272 108,978 0.52 Electronic Reads Every Reads Every 2 months 1 Month Difference Annual Annual Annual Per Read 252,215 252,215 32,290 32,290 6,373 6,373 290,877 290,877 * Includes capital costs of $160,523 and labor costs of $91,692 Related Data Assumptions Number of annual water bills 208,680 CONTRACT FOR METER READING SERVICES This agreement is made and entered into between the City of Pasco, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", and Columbia Meter Reading, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor ". In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein contained the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF WORK. The Contractor shall read or cause to be read all meters measuring the flow of water from the City water transmission system in accordance with written schedules and maps supplied by the City. Such schedules will provide for the reading of water meters from specified areas or parts thereof within the City's water system at regular intervals. Such schedules may be suspended or revised by the City if, in its sole discretion, such action is required. The reading of water meters shall consist of; accessing the water meter, raising or lifting the lid of the meter box (small metal flap), raising the small metal cover -plate on the meter, wiping any dust or dirt accumulated since the prior reading, reading the numerical readout on the meter, muting the reading into the electronic handheld device or writing down the reading for future input into electronic handheld device, replacing the small metal cover -plate on the meter and closing the meter box lid. In most instances the contractor will be required to bend down and in some cases get down on their hands and knees to read a meter. There will be a few meters were the contractor will be required to lift a heavy lid and climb down into a vault to obtain a reading. A vault is a confined space in which all applicable safety regulations must be followed. At the City's discretion, the contractor will also be required to replace broken meter box lids when found during the routine reading of a route. The City will provide the contractor with a supply of new meter box lids. All daily reading and other assignments shall originate and be dispatched from the Finance Department at Pasco City Hall located at 525 N. 3 Ave., Pasco, Washington. When reading meters, the Contractor shall check for and record obvious meter malfunctions and damages to the meter or the meter box or lid and report same to the City. If the Contractor deviates from the reading schedules provided by the City without prior approval (not having readings completed as scheduled) the City has the right to impose a penalty (see COMPENSATION). If the percentage of unread meters, excluding defective meters, is over 3% per book the City has the right to impose a penalty (see COMPENSATION). In addition to meter reading, the Contractor shall perform water meter turn-ons and turn -offs at the direction of the City and shall be responsible for emergency turn-on and turn -off services. The Contractor shall be available on a 24 hour basis, seven days a week, for such service. It is against City Ordinance for any unauthorized person to tum -on or tum -off a water meter. Any costs associated with the repair or replacement resulting from a violation of that ordinance, plus a penalty fee, will be billed to the customer. 2. COMPENSATION. The City agrees to pay the Contractor at the rates shown in Exhibit A. 1. For meter reading 2. For service tum -ons and turn -offs and simultaneous tum -ons and turn -offs. 3. For after hours and emergency turn -ons and tum -offs. "After hours" means a tum -on or turn -off assigned to /or received by the contractor after 5:00 p.m. and before 8:00 a.m. the following day. 4. For re- reading meters City staff suspects the original reading may not be accurate. 5. For meter box lid replacements. 6. For testing of the air in confined vault spaces for the breathing safety of the reader. 7. The City has the right to impose a penalty for not having meter reading completed as scheduled, to be deducted from the next regular payment. 8. The City has the right to impose a penalty when the percentage of unread meters and/or reading errors exceeds 3% per book, to be deducted from the next regular payment. 9. The City has the right to impose a penalty in the event the Contractor cannot be reached and sends a public works employee to respond to a call. The amount due the Contractor for services for the month shall be calculated from the 26th to the 25th of each month and paid to by the 10th of the following month. 3. PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS. The personnel used by the Contractor in connection with the services rendered hereunder shall be persons of good character. Moreover, such personnel must be dressed to distinctively indicate their status as personnel of the Contractor and the Contractor shall employ a standard uniform in the conduct of its business. A standard uniform may either have a patch sewn on clothing or a separate vest with the words 'METER READER' visible. The Contractor shall provide a minimum of two persons to perform the work required in connection with the services to be rendered hereunder and shall have an adequate pool of reserve employees to fulfill the requirements specified herein within a reasonable amount of time. The City reserves the right to disapprove the continued use of any employee of the Contractor when it comes to the attention of the City that the employee has acted contrary to the best interest of the City in the performance of the services to be rendered hereunder. Such employee shall be immediately removed from performance of the services hereunder by the Contractor upon its receipt of written notice of disapproval from the City. 4. VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS. Vehicle and Equipment requirements are as follow: a. The Contractor shall supply at least two vehicles suitable for the services specified herein, and maintained in a condition acceptable to the city and identified with the words "WATER METER READER" (magnetic sign acceptable). The use of electric personal assistive mobility devices to obtain meter reads are specifically allowed, but not required. b. The Contractor will provide a cellular telephone for immediate communication with the Finance Department at City Hall and which shall be in the possession of the employee(s) or the reserve employee who has the immediate responsibility for the performance of the service requirements provided hereunder. c. All items of property provided to the Contractor by the City will remain the property of the City. The Contractor will be responsible for all property of the City delivered unto its custody until it is returned to the City. It shall provide or obtain written receipts therefore as required by the City Finance Manager. All property shall be returned in good working condition, normal wear and tear excepted. d. The Contractor shall supply all tools necessary to perform the requirements of the contract. (See DAILY REQUIREMENTS.) 5. CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSES. Costs and expenses incurred by the Contractor and/or its personnel in connection with the services rendered hereunder, except as may be specifically stated otherwise herein, shall be the sole cost and expense of the Contractor including, but not limited, to fuel costs, vehicle maintenance expenses, uniforms, wages and other employee benefits. 6. DAILY REQUIREMENTS. Monday through Friday of each week, except in the case of a holiday, the Contractor shall report to the Utility Billing Manager, or designee, at approximately 9:00 a.m., 12:30 p.m. and 4:30 p.m., to be given a schedule of work, including delinquent turn offs, hangers, re- reads, other turn-ons and turn-offs, and reads, if any, as prepared by the City. All work orders given to the Contractor must be completed and returned to the office at the next scheduled arrival. Any deviations from the schedule must be cleared through the Utility Billing Manager, or designee. Any work orders that are not completed in accordance for the schedule will not be compensated unless the deviation is approved by the Utility Billing Manager, or designee. The Contractor shall be available to the by cellular phone or by telephone 24 hours a day for the assigning of emergency water service turn-ons and turn -offs. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to keep any answering service used informed of which employee's are on call for emergency turn -ons and turn-offs. Emergency turn -ons and turn-offs shall be performed expeditiously, within 30 minutes of assignment, to minimize any potential property damage. Meter readings shall be performed within the schedule designated by the City but the actual hours worked by the Contractor in the performance of meter reading shall be at the Contractor's discretion, so long as the meter reading is performed within said schedule. Monday through Friday, as previously specified, the Contractor or a specifically designated employee of the Contractor shall give to the Utility Billing Manager, or designee, all required records of water tum -ons and tum -offs and meter readings performed by the Contractor's personnel but not yet reported to the City. The Contractor or its employees are not authorized to collect nor shall they collect any monies whatsoever from the City's utility customers for services performed or for payments on account. Each employee of the Contractor must have the following meter reading equipment available to them at all times: a flat -head screwdriver; a key for large meters; a key for padlocks used for lock - offs; a water pump; a shovel; a pick; blue paint; and door hangers. PERSONNEL TRAINING. The Contractor shall insure that all employees are properly trained, to the City's satisfaction, in the methods by which meters are to be read and the results recorded, and to insure the meters are read accurately and without damage to City property in accordance with the schedules established by the City. Contractor shall further insure that all employees are trained as to the location of the City's water meters for readings and service turn -ons and turn-offs without damage to the meters or others property. 8. ACCURACY OF READINGS. The accuracy for each meter reading and the reporting thereof shall be the responsibility of the Contractor and/or its personnel. Re -reads requested by the City shall be without compensation to the Contractor if the original read was in error. If a meter is re -read and no error is found to have occurred the Contractor shall be compensated by the City at the rate shown in Exhibit A. 9. ACCESSIBILITY OF METERS. It is acknowledged by both parties that the City's water meters can be obscured from vision by physical elements, water and/or other materials. It is the responsibility of the customer to keep the meter free from overgrown shrub growth and debris and to maintain the area around the meter to allow easy access for meter reading purposes. If a meter is obscured from vision due to water or dirt in the meter box, the Contractor and/or its personnel shall be required to pump out the water or dig out the dirt and obtain a reading. If a meter is unable to be found, due to it being covered by substantial sand, dirt or other debris, then the meter reader shall have the responsibility of leaving a door hanger at the location and reporting such failure to find the meter and the reason therefore on their report sheet for follow -up action by the City and shall be paid at the regular meter reading rate. If the meter reader cannot obtain a meter reading for safety reasons (i.e., a mean animal in the area), the reader shall try to obtain the residence's assistance, or leave a door hanger explaining when he /she will return to obtain a reading. If, upon returning, the animal is still loose and a reading cannot be obtained, the reader will leave another door hanger notifying the customer the reading will be estimated. The reader must keep a log of the addresses that have been left a hanger, the date it was left, and the reason the hanger was needed. The log should be turned into the Finance Department along with the readings for that particular route and the contractor shall be paid at the regular meter reading rate. 10. INCLEMENT WEATHER/SUSPENSION OF METER READING SERVICES. Parties recognize that snow or extreme cold or other weather conditions may substantially affect the accessibility of City water meters and their susceptibility to damage from the cold if a reading is attempted. The City, in its sole discretion, shall have the authority to suspend meter reading for such periods of time deemed appropriate and reasonably necessary. i��6Y1J_ 7_`►[" The Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, their agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Contractor shall obtain insurance of the types described below: 1. Automobile Liabilitv insurance covering all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liabilitv insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products - completed operations, stop gap liability, personal injury and advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract. The Commercial General Liability insurance shall be endorsed to provide the Aggregate Per Project Endorsement ISO form CG 25 03 11 85. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance for liability arising from explosion, collapse or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an insured under the Contractor's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City using ISO Additional Insured endorsement CG 20 10 10 01 and Additional Insured - Completed Operations endorsement CG 20 37 10 01 or substitute endorsements providing equivalent coverage. 3. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. B. Minimum Amounts of Insurance Contractor shall maintain the following insurance limits: 1. Automobile Liabilitv insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. 2. Commercial General Liabilitv insurance shall be written with limits no less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate and a $2,000,000 products - completed operations aggregate limit. C. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance: The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respect the City. Any Insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. The Contractor's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. D. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A:VII. E. Verification of Coverage Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Contractor before commencement of the work. F. Subcontractors Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the same insurance requirements as stated herein for the Contractor. 12. INDEMNITY. In the performance hereunder, Contractor is an independent contractor, the City being interested only in the result obtained. The manner and means of conducting such work will be under the sole controls of Contractor, except as herein specifically provided. However, all work performed hereunder will be done in accordance with the provisions hereof and be subject to the right if of inspection by the City and its representatives. The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits including attorney fees, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Agreement, except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City. Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Contractor and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Contractor's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Contractor's negligence. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Contractor's waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance. Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Contractor agrees to indemnify the City for loss or damage to any of the City's property or equipment issued or obtained in connection with the work to be performed hereunder. 13. REQUIREMENTS OF LAW. In the performance of the work provided for herein, the Contractor agrees that it shall be conducted in full compliance with any and all applicable laws, rules, and regulations adopted or promulgated by any government agency or regulatory body, either municipal, state or federal. The Contractor expressly agrees that in the performance of work hereunder compliance will be had with the applicable provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as amended, and with all valid regulations having applications thereto. The Contractor assumes sole responsibility for the payment of all contributions, payroll taxes or assessments, state or federal, as to all employees engaged in the performance of work hereunder, and further agrees to meet all requirements that may be specified under regulations of administrative officials or bodies charged with enforcement of any state or federal act, upon the subject referred to. The Contractor assumes and agrees to pay any and all gross receipts, compensation, use, transaction, sale, or other taxes or assessments of whatever nature or kind levied or assessed as a consequence of the work to be performed or on the compensation to be paid hereunder. 14. ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS. For the purpose of this Contract, time is of the essence. Should any dispute arise concerning the enforcement, breach or interpretation of this Contract, venue shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington, the laws of the State of Washington shall apply, and the prevailing parties shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney's fees and costs. 15. TERM OF CONTRACT /TERMINATION. The term of this contract shall be for a period beginning 12:00 a.m. April 1, 2012 and ending at 11:59 p.m. March 31, 2015, unless earlier terminated as provided hereunder. Either party may, without cause, terminate this contract by providing 90 days written notice to the other. Either party has the right to terminate this agreement if the other defaults in performing any of the covenants and agreements contained in, provided that prior thereto the party terminating the contract shall have given the other party written notice of the facts constituting the default and the other party shall have not remedied the same within thirty days of the receipt of the notice. Upon mutual agreement of both parties, this contract may be extended for one additional year term. 16. COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This agreement is the whole and complete agreement of the parties, superceding and replacing all others and may not be replaced, modified or revoked without the same being in writing signed by all of the parties. In witness whereof, the parties hereto have executed this agreement this day of 2012. CiZi Representative: CITY OF PASCO: Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: Debra Clark, City Clerk FEW j : elma t3rTIVI e]"iI:MU Leland Kerr, City Attorney Exhibit A COMPENSATION: The City agrees to pay the contractor at the following rates: 1. Per meter Read $1.21 2. Per turn-off or turn -on $4.26 and simultaneous turn -ons and turn -offs 3. Per non - scheduled after hours call outs $42.77 "After hours" means a turn -on or turn -off assigned to /or received by the contractor after 5:00 p.m. and before 8:00 a.m. the following day. 4. Per re -read, when the original read turns out to be correct $7.13 when the original read turns is NOT correct $0.00 5. Per meter box lid replacement If done by work order $6.00 If done while on route being read $0.00 Contractor will carry a small inventory of meter box lids, provided by the City, to replace damaged lids. 6. Per each air test for breathing safety in confined vault spaces $14.26 Penalties: 7. There shall be a $100.00 /day penalty for not having meter reading completed as scheduled. 8. There shall be a $100.00 penalty per every 1% when the percentage of unread meters exceeds 3% per book. 9. There shall be a $150.00 penalty when the City sends a public works employee to respond to a location when the Contractor cannot be reached. AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council July 5, 2012 TO: Gary Crutch Manager Workshop Mtg.: 7/9/12 II` Regular Mtg: 7/16/12 FROM: Rick Terway, Lirector, Administrative & unity Services SUBJECT: Park Code Infractions and Bail I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Park Infractions H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 7/9: Discussion 7116: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , setting monetary penalties for Park Code Infractions and, further, authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) On June 18, 2012 Council approved Ordinance No. 4063 authorizing the Administrative and Community Services Director enforcement authority over PMC 9.48 `Park Code.' V. DISCUSSION: A) During the process of training the Park Rangers for issuance of citations, it was discovered that there were no monetary penalties set for these infractions. Richland and Kennewick also do not have any similar ordinances with set penalties. The State of Washington provides a state -wide schedule for use by courts for these types of offences: Infraction Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction, Rule 6.2(a)(3) "Parks and Recreation ", as amended, for violations of similar provisions of the Washington Administrative Code." Most park violations are listed under WAC 352. B) With the adoption of this rule it provides both the citizens and the Court a readily identifiable amount that is consistent with the penalty imposed for the same violations in State Parks and is up -dated without the necessity of constantly amending our Code. This is the same practice our police department uses for traffic infractions. C) Staff recommends approval of the Ordinance adopting changes to PMC 9.48. 4(g) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, setting monetary penalties for Park Code infractions in PMC 9.48. WHEREAS, the City desires to improve public safety and compliance with park rules and regulations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is appropriate to set monetary penalties for infractions of park rules found in PMC 9.48 "Park Code "; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. There is hereby established a new Section 9.48.300 of the Pasco Municipal Code to read as follows: 9.48.300 INFRACTION PENALTIES. Penalties for infractions included in this Chapter shall be those penalty amounts as set forth in the Infraction Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction, Rule 6.2(a)(3) "Parks and Recreation ", as amended, for violations of similar provisions of the Washington Administrative Code." Section 2. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, this 16'h day of July, 2012. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark; City Clerk Leland B. Ken, City Attorney Park Infractions PMC 9.48 Park Hours $138 Posting Signs $87 Animals $87 Feeding Animals $87 Commercial Activity $138 Parking $ 87 Restriction on Vehicles $163 Skateboarding $87 Noise $138 Remote Control Models $87 Trails $137 Golfing, Baseball, etc. $87 Littering $ 87 Building Fires $87 Overnight Camping $138