Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-21-2012 Planning Commission Packet PLANNING COMMISSION -AGENDA REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. June 21, 2012 I. CALL TO ORDER: II. ROLL CALL: Declaration of Quorum III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 17, 2012 V. OLD BUSINESS: A. Special Permit Expansion of a jail (Franklin County Jail) (MF# SP 2012-011) B. Zoning Rezone from R-1 (Low Density Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential) (Pasco Family Housing) (MF# Z 2012-001) VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Block Grant Administration 2013 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund Allocations (MF# BGAP 2012- 003 B. Block Grant Administration 2013 HOME Fund Allocations (MF# BGAP 2012-004) C. Block Grant Administration 2013 Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Fund Allocations (MF# BGAP 2012-005) D. Block Grant Administration Significant Amendment to the 4th Avenue Wall (MF# BGAP 2012-006) E. Code Amendment Secondhand Stores in C-1 Zones (MF# CA 2012-003) F. Plan Rivershore Amenities/Linkages Plan (MF# PLAN 2012-003) VII. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Information Interpretation of MF# SP10-021 Conditions (MF# INFO 2012-003) (No Memo for the packet) VIII. WORKSHOP: IX. ADJOURNMENT: REGULAR MEETING May 17, 2012 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:OOpm by Chairman Cruz. POSITION MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT No. 1 Michael Levin No. 2 Vacant No. 3 Andy Anderson No. 4 Alecia Greenaway No. 5 Joe Cruz No. 6 Vacant No. 7 Zahra Khan No. 8 Jana Kempf No. 9 Paul Hilliard APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS: Chairman Cruz read a statement about the appearance of fairness for hearings on land use matters. Chairman Cruz asked if any Commission member had anything to declare. There were no declarations. Chairman Cruz then asked the audience if there were any objections based on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness questions regarding the items to be discussed this evening. There were no objections. ADMINISTERING THE OATH: Chairman Cruz explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or affirmation. Chairman Cruz swore in all those desiring to speak. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, that the minutes dated April 19, 2012 be approved as mailed. The motion passed unanimously. -1- OLD BUSINESS: A. Special Permit Redevelopment of a school recreation field in an RS-12 Zone (Tri-City Jr. Academy) (MF# SP 2012-0081 Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community 8a Economic Development Director, explained staff had nothing to add unless the Commission had any questions. There were no questions from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Khan moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the May 17, 2012 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Khan moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Tri-City Junior Academy for the redevelopment of a recreation field with conditions as contained in the May 17, 2012 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. White stated this item will go to next regular City Council meeting on June 4, 2012 unless appealed. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Special Permit Re-opened Public Hearing for expanding the capacity of a pre-school from 50 to 80 children in an existing church in an R-S-20 Zone (Imagination Studios Academy Preschool) (MF# SP 2012-007) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, explained the purpose for re-opening the hearing was to introduce evidence related to traffic counts. The traffic counts present in the initial hearing were inconsistent with information present with the 2010 Special Permit application for the initial 50 student pre-school. A new traffic table in the staff report was reviewed for the benefit of the Planning Commission. Mr. White explained that aside from the traffic counts, nothing else changed in the staff report. Mr. White also stated the Planning Commission received an additional letter from a nearby property owner. Chairman Cruz clarified the additional letter was sent by Mr. Roger Lenk on May 16, 2012 specifically mentioning traffic counts among other items. -2- Matthew Welk, 1908 N Road 72, spoke on behalf of Imagination Studios Academy Preschool. He asked staff to clarify the new traffic count information. Mr. White answered that a student would generate approximately four trips because they are dropped off then picked up, causing the parent to make four trips. Rick Perez, 2512 Road 76, spoke in favor of Imagination Studios Academy Preschool increasing their number of students. He stated that it is a nice addition to the neighborhood. He briefly asked a question in regards to the traffic counts. Mr. White answered the traffic information came from a number of studies conducted in other places, times and locations. Those studies provide and average count that gives the results in the staff report. Mr. Perez stated that the church has traffic but it is no different than other schools in the area. The residential neighborhood is growing exponentially so traffic is increasing from the increase in residents more so than schools. The preschool is not a nuisance to the neighborhood. The children only go outdoors for about an hour a day. The outdoor activities that they have are enjoyable and not loud. Chairman Cruz asked Mr. Perez if he would describe the outdoor play area as an "amphitheater-like" setting in regards to the noise. Mr. Perez answered no, the noise is not amplified and the area is flat. Andrea Turner, 9317 Broughton Drive, her daughter attends the preschool and she drives Road 72 three days per week. Traffic has not been an issue. With no further comments the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the May 17, 2012 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Greenaway, based on findings of fact and conclusions therefrom the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Imagination Studios Academy Preschool for the expansion of its existing preschool operation at 1800 Road 72, with conditions as listed in the May 17, 2012 staff report. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. White stated this item will go to next regular City Council meeting on June 4, 2012 unless appealed. B. Special Permit Expansion of a _jail (Franklin County Jail) (MF# SP 2012-011) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. -3- David McDonald, City Planner, explained how the County had grown since the current jail was opened in 1985 from a population of 35,700 to approximately 83,000. A brief history was provided on the development of the courthouse complex starting with the original courthouse in 1910, the addition of the public safety building in 1973 and the current jail in 1983. The main parking lot along 4th Avenue was added in 2008. Mr. McDonald explained the current jail facilities were designed to house 103 inmates but now routinely houses 200 or more inmates per day. The County is proposing to add a new 192-bed jail with supporting facilities at the north end of the existing jail building. The new building will also provide courtrooms for the Pasco Municipal Court, Pasco Municipal Court offices and some office space for the County Sheriff's Department. The new addition will be 55,000 square feet in size and will extend through an existing parking of and part of vacated Octave Street. Mr. McDonald reviewed the written staff report and addressed staff recommendations on items, such as noise and fencing. Commissioner Hilliard asked if the fencing on the back side would be required to match the fencing on Fourth Avenue. Mr. McDonald explained the backside of the Courthouse on Fifth Avenue currently has a chain-link fence and the architect would be able to answer the question better. Christopher Patano, 1809 7th Avenue, Seattle, WA spoke on behalf of the applicant and addressed the perimeter of the building on the back of the building and new parking lot. The chain-link fencing will remain in those areas. The ornamental fencing on the front side of the building will be extended to the new entry. Mr. Patano reviewed some slides for the benefit of the Planning Commission and explained how the new building would tie into the existing buildings. Commissioner Hilliard asked Mr. Patano about the lighting for the exterior and if it would affect the neighbors to the west. Mr. Patano answered that they are still working on the lighting. With the regulations and new exterior lighting fixtures they will limit light pollution. The new fixtures help control light spillage. With no further comments the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Kempf moved, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact, and development of a recommendation for City Council for the June 21, 2012 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. OTHER BUSINESS: City Staff and Planning Commission thanked Commissioner James Hay, who recently resigned, for his 24 years of service on the Pasco Planning Commission. In his 24 years served, he only missed 2 meetings. -4- WORKSHOP: A. Code Amendment Secondhand Stores in C-1 Zones (MF# CA 2012-003) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, reviewed the history of the prohibition against secondhand stores in several zoning districts, including the C-1 (Retail Business) Zone, Central Business District Zone, Business Park Zone, the "O" (Office) Zone and CR (Commercial Regional) Zone. Secondhand stores are permitted in C-3 (General Business) and I-1 (Light Industrial) zones provided they are at least 1,000 feet from another. These prohibitions were adopted in the 1990 to combat a decline in property values and private investment, particularly in the Downtown area. The regulations have had an impact on the Downtown area. If the code was to be amended Staff explained it would be helpful to modify definitions for, pawn shop, consignment store and thrift store. Five code options were presented to the Planning Commission to consider for the zoning amendment: (1) Amend the code to allow (donation-based) thrift shops in C-1 zones by special permit if they meet certain conditions, (2) Amend the code to allow thrift shops and consignment stores in C-1 zones by special permit if they meet and maintain certain conditions, (3) Amend the code to allow thrift shops, consignment stores and pawnshops in C-1 zones by special permit if they meet and maintain certain conditions, (4) Amend the code to retain restrictions on pawnshops; allow donation-based thrift shops through special permit in C-1 zones and allow consignment stores as a permitted use in C-1, CBD and C-3 zones, (5) No change to the code. Goodwill Industries submitted a letter for consideration. The letter suggested the size of a thrift store might be a variable to include in a code amendment. The size of the store would have an impact on the ability of the store to maintain its presence in a manner that would complement the surrounding business area and the City. Commissioner Khan stated that she has seen many consignment stores in the Tri- Cities that have done an excellent job of not contributing to blight. Many have a good business reputation. Commissioner Anderson was interested in the square footage proposal that Goodwill Industries put forth in their letter. The concern he had with the proposal, however, was that some places not only have the store but a storage area. He recommended the square footage should consider store display space, not the size of the building. Commissioner Hilliard asked if Pasco has any existing pawn shops. Mr. White answered that he believes they are all gone. -5- Commissioner Hilliard questioned whether or not pawn shops should be allowed back into the Business District in the future under stricter regulation. Commissioner Anderson mentioned that pawn shops are highly regulated enterprises. They are required to report each item they take-in, required to have identification for each person that turns in an item, so they shouldn't have a bad reputation. With that said, he felt they should be controlled as to where they are located. Chairman Cruz added that it was more a question of density and proximity and that is where the focus should lie. Any number of the defined secondhand businesses could be good contributing members of the community, however you wouldn't want several of them all put together. In larger communities there isn't a stigma that goes along with having a secondhand store next to any other retail shop. Gordon Comfort, 5990 Finewood Loop, West Richland, WA spoke on behalf of Goodwill Industries. He mentioned that the proximity or minimum distance component makes him a little nervous just because of where Goodwill Industries would like to locate. For instance, if they found a great location but there was a smaller secondhand store next door, the location would be off limits. If the building size restriction was put in place, the proximity may no longer be an issue. Mr. Comfort used the liquor store model as an example to illustrate how using square footage restrictions would make proximity unnecessary because it would address density issues. Commissioner Khan mentioned that it might be difficult to assign a square footage restriction. She asked if it would be done just to thrift stores but not to consignment stores since they are typically smaller than thrift stores. Chairman Cruz said that they could use a table dividing pawnshops, thrift stores and consignment shops and having different requirements for each. Or they can all be treated the same. Almost anything could be done as long as the code isn't too complicated. Commissioner Anderson asked staff if consignment stores are required to report what they take in. Mr. White answered consignment stores have no reporting requirements. Commissioner Anderson said that if consignment stores had to report what they take in it would become burdensome on law enforcement. He feels that the square footage restrictions are the way to go with special permit in the C-1 and CBD. Commissioner Khan agreed with Commissioner Anderson. Chairman Cruz suggested special permits only for CBD and C-1 zones for donation- based and pawn shops and perhaps look at size restrictions. He asked how the Commissioners felt about addressing proximity. -6- Commissioner Khan stated that she liked comments on the liquor store model and how it would alleviate the proximity question, yet still address density. She asked if proximity could be considered case by case. Mr. White stated making variations or exceptions would not be his recommendation. Regulations could be written to automatically exclude secondhand stores in close proximity or they could be allowed through a special permit. He asked if the Commission was recommending a special permit for all secondhand stores, regardless of proximity, in CBD and C-1 zones. Commissioner Anderson said that the Commission could go even farther and restrict the type of establishment allowed in the Downtown District versus the C-1 zone. Commissioner Hilliard stated the Downtown Pasco Development Authority is trying to revitalize the area and needs businesses in the Downtown. He felt more restrictions make it harder to bring businesses into the area. He agreed with limiting the concentration but he didn't want to make a decision that would hurt the businesses. Commissioner Anderson felt the downtown should not be a mecca of secondhand stores and pawn shops but a destination with nice restaurants, wine tasting and shopping. This is one of the first steps to go down the proper path. Commissioner Khan and Chairman Cruz briefly mentioned diversity of businesses in Downtown Walla Walla. Mr. White asked for clarification about limiting pawn shops to I-1 and C-3 zones, such as allowing consignment stores in the C-1 and Central Business District with a proximity limitation and allowing thrift shops, or donation-based, stores by special permit in the C-1 zones with a size consideration. Chairman Cruz asked about thrift stores in Central Business District. Mr. White said he did not have thrift stores in the Central Business District down but it could be considered. He explained the Business Park, CR (Commercial Regional) and "O" (Office) zones were left alone for now. Commissioner Khan stated she favored including thrift stores in the CBD. Commissioner Anderson asked if Goodwill was already in the CBD. Mr. White stated the warehouse was in the I-1 zone and the store was in the CBD zone. Chairman Cruz commented that for the CBD perhaps have larger thrift store requirement. This item will come back at the next meeting for a public hearing. -7- B. Plan Rivershore Amenities/Linkages Plan (MF# PLAN 2012-003) Chairman Cruz read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Rick White, Community 8v Economic Development Director, explained the plan was briefly discussed at the previous meeting. It was explained the fourteen miles of Columbia and Snake River shoreline was divided into segments based on geography and similar characteristics to produce an inventory along with a short and long-term list of recommendations. Mr. White pointed out there were a couple of segments that staff would like the Commission to discuss. The Columbia Section between the Richland Bridge and Chiawanna Park contains the most private properties and the most concentration of piers and docks. It is also problematic from a grade standpoint. There is a small space between the water and the high water mark, making the public area very confined. Staff sought input as to the advisability of pursuing extension of the Columbia River Trail adjacent to the private property or to simply divert the trail away from the river. Commissioner Anderson stated he would rather go with the option to divert since it is already set up that way and the distance would not be that far. Chairman Cruz said there were a number of areas along the river where the path would not be reasonable. Commissioner Greenaway agreed there would be too many issues dealing with private properties and docks. Commissioner Khan agreed with the other commissioners. She asked if the Chiawanna section belonged to the Army Corp of Engineers and if that's why it has not been developed. Mr. White stated yes. The Chiawanna Park section has the most constraints and opportunities. One of the critical questions for this area is what to do with the vacant land and what should be the nature of Chiawanna Park. There may be opportunity for commercial vendor spaces, particularly near the boat launch. Those kinds of amenities can however alter the impact on the neighbors. One idea is to have a staging area for mobile food vendors throughout the summer to early fall. Commissioner Anderson stated from his experience, it would be nice to have a place to come off the river and sit and have something to eat. However, there should be some limitations on vendors, their hours of operation and length of the season. Commissioner Kempf mentioned there will need to be consideration for the native tribes, meaning digging could be problematic so vendors could not be permanent. It could take years for an archeological study to take place. Commissioner Greenaway agreed with Commissioner Anderson regarding food vendors near the boat ramps. It could increase community activity. -8- Commissioner Khan would like to see more pavilion spaces constructed. Commissioner Hilliard stated that all of the previous comments would be nice additions to the park and community. Chairman Cruz clarified that there was not a lot of support for permanent enterprise at the park. He also felt it might be good to discuss where to put the boat launch as the population is rising and there will be a need. Also, it might be a good idea to see a community center to draw more traffic to the area. More pavilions are a good idea. Chairman Cruz noted the lack of beaches in the Tri-Cities area. There are many miles of rivershore but no beaches. This is one of the few areas where a beach could be located. Mr. White discussed the Moore Mansion section. The plan was to enhance the levy by piping and filling the drainage ditch then vegetating both sides to minimize the grade associated with the levy. It will not make the levy go away but if done correctly it will have the effect of reducing it as a barrier to the river. It is also an expensive proposition. Commissioner Khan voiced concern about unsightly graffiti and trash on the underside of the Blue Bridge. She asked if a barrier could be made to keep the area nice. Mr. White clarified that Commissioner Khan was referring to blocking access from the underside of the bridge, not access to the trail. That would be a good recommendation for other bridges as well. Commissioner Hilliard suggested using landscaping to be pleasing and block access to the underside of the bridge. Mr. White discussed the Flamingo Village section stating the plan included landscaping one or both sides of the levy and enhancements to the trail for riverfront development. The main issue needing input was the zoning landward from the levy which is Industrial. The Industrial zoning encourages industrial uses as permitted in the Industrial District. One of the recommendations is to change the zoning to allow more retail uses to allow the community to get closer to the river. Commissioner Khan asked if that would mean the trailer park community in that area would be displaced. Mr. White answered not necessarily but over a period of time that might occur. Chairman Cruz stated that wouldn't happen overnight but it was possible. If a retail area was zoned it would become comparable to Clover Island. Chairman Cruz stated that he was in favor of the rezone. Commissioner Khan was also in favor a looking at a rezone in that area. -9- Commissioner Anderson agreed there was an opportunity to change the character of that area by removing the Industrial designation and make it retail. Chairman Cruz asked what would happen when Central Pre-mix goes away. Pasco does not have a good zone for non-motorized recreation. Perhaps it would be nice to preserve that basin for non-motorized aquatic recreation. He didn't feel a giant boat basin was the way to go. Mixed development with non-motorized use of that basin would be better. Carl Kostoff, 4403 Arlington Street, West Richland, stated that he just rode from West Richland to Sacajawea and appreciates what the City has done with the trail. It is a nice trail. One thing he wanted to bring up was the aspect of the Cable Bridge coming over to Pasco. Not only did he have a problem trying to get back on the trail but he ran into others who did not know how to get back on the trail due to lack of signage. He also felt the trail lacked businesses, bike rentals and food vendors. Mr. White said that signage is important and was one of the greatest things emphasized in the Tri-Cities Master Plan. With no further discussion or business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 8:34 p.m. Respectfully submitted, David McDonald, City Planner -10- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 2012-011 APPLICANT: LCA + pH LLC. c/o HEARING DATE: 5/17/12 Franklin County ACTION DATE: 6/21/12 1016 N 4th Ave. Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Expansion of the County Courthouse and Correctional Facility 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Leal: Blocks 6 8s 7 and Lots 13-28 Block 8, Sylvester Park Addition, together with vacated Henry Street and the vacated north, south, east 8v west alleys in said Block 7, together with adjacent portions of vacated Octave Street and the adjacent potions of vacated Marie Street General Location: 1016 N. 41h Avenue Property Size: Approximately 5.7 acres 2. ACCESS: The site is accessible from 4th and 5th Avenues. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and C-1 (Retail Business) and contains the Franklin County courthouse, correctional facility and parking lot. Surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: NORTH - C-1 - Commercial/Church SOUTH - C-1 - Offices EAST - R -1 - City Park WEST - R-1 & '0' - Residential/Vacant 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Government/Public 8v Commercial uses. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non-significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. 1 ANALYSIS The Franklin County courthouse complex has existed in one form or another at 1016 North Fourth Avenue for over 100 years. The original courthouse was constructed in 1910. In 1973 the Public Safety Building was added to the west of the original courthouse. The Public Safety Building was built to house the Sherriff's Department, courtrooms and a County jail. In 1982 a new County jail was added to the north of the Public Safety Building and opened in 1985. In 2003 the voters in Franklin County approved a bond to restore the original courthouse. The restoration work, completed in 2004, also included a work release jail addition placed on the northwest side of the main jail wing and a temporary (portable) courtroom that was placed in the parking lot north of the jail. The courthouse security building was added in 2007. The major additions to the courthouse complex all occurred well after the surrounding neighborhoods were developed with homes. The Sylvester Addition and subsequent Additions west of the courthouse complex were platted in the 1890's. Most of the homes in these subdivisions were constructed in the 1940's. The only major land use changes in the neighborhood over the years have been additions to the courthouse. Since the jail opening in 1985, the County has increased in population from 35,700 to approximately 83,000. This significant growth (47,300 people) in population has increased the need for services within the community, including the need for governmental services. The community is currently at a point where the present jail facilities and court facilities are no longer adequate to serve the needs of Franklin County. The current jail facilities were designed to house 103 inmates, but now routinely house 200 or more inmates per day. The County is proposing to add a new 192-bed jail with supporting facilities at the north end of the existing jail building constructed in 1982. The new building will also contain new courtrooms for municipal court and offices for the Sheriff's Department. The new addition will be 55,000 square feet in size and will extend through an existing parking lot and part of vacated Octave Street. The work release facility (added in 2004) and the County Coroner's office, now in the temporary courtroom, will be removed from the site. The architecture of the new addition will be similar in nature to the existing 1973 and 1982 courthouse additions. Brick and brick glazing will match the existing facilities as closely as possible. Pre-cast concrete and metal trim panels will also be used to bring the color scheme of the buildings together. In 2008 Franklin County received Special Permit approval for parking lot improvements along 4th Avenue. The Health District office was razed and the area was leveled and redeveloped into the current parking configuration. This 2 parking lot added 90 new spaces to the courthouse complex. There is no specific parking requirement in the zoning regulation related directly to the courthouse. Offices require one space for every 300 square feet of floor area on the main floor and one space for every 500 square feet of floor area on other floors. Police stations also require one space for every 300 square feet of floor area and juvenile detention centers (the only listed use similar to a jail) require one and half spaces per bed. Based on the forgoing, the courthouse complex does not have enough parking to meet code requirements. There are currently about 230 parking spaces available to the public and employees. Another 67 spaces are currently fenced off (in the lot behind Atomic Foods) and are used for storage. The proposed addition will eliminate approximately 70 spaces. Most of the spaces to be lost to construction are surrounding the coroner's office. Through observation and reports from the County Administrator's office this parking area is underutilized and is often more than 50 percent vacant. A survey of the parking area on May 8 and May 10, 2012 revealed there were 32 empty parking spaces. The County parking lot west of Atomic Foods was also sparsely occupied on those dates. The County will be removing the fencing in the parking lot west of Atomic Foods and eliminating the storage yard. This will almost fully replace parking spaces being eliminated by new construction. The County owns two vacant parcels west of 5th Avenue which could be developed for parking when the need arises in the future. Access to the new jail will be from the exiting sallyport (which will be enlarged) at the southwest end of the current facilities. One or more mechanical room doors will face 5th Avenue, as will several staff emergency exiting doors. No public access will be located on the west side of the building. Access to the courtrooms will be from the east side of the building facing the parking lot. A new curb cut and receiving area will be provided where the new building adjoins the current building. This receiving area is located directly across 5th Avenue from one of the vacant lots owned by the County. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report and comments made at the public hearing. The Planning Commission may add additional findings as deemed appropriate. 1. The site is located in the R-1 and C-1 zones. 2. The site is approximately 5.7 acres. 3. The site contains the Franklin County courthouse and correctional facility. 4. The courthouse has been located on the site since 1910. 3 5. The Public Safety Building was added to the courthouse in 1973. 6. In 1983 a new County jail was added to the Public Safety Building. 7. The 1983 jail facility was put into service in 1985. 8. The work-release facility and temporary courtrooms were placed on the property in 2004 9. The security building was built in 2007. 10. The Health District office building was demolished in 2008 to allow for expansion of the courthouse parking lot along North 4th Avenue. 11. The subdivisions west of the courthouse were platted in the 1890's. 12. The residential homes located west of the courthouse were built in the 1940's and 1950's. 13. Major additions to the courthouse occurred long after the neighborhood to the west was developed. 14. Franklin County's population has increased by 43,700 since the current jail facilities were opened in 1985. 15. The current jail facilities were designed to house 103 inmates. Today the County jail consistently houses over 200 inmates per day. 16. Current courtrooms and court offices are located on the site. 17. Jail facilities are described in the Growth Management Act as essential public facilities and as such cannot be precluded from locating within the community. 18. There will be no public access to the new jail and courtroom addition from 5th Avenue. Access will be by way of existing points from current buildings and/or from the parking lot along 4th Avenue. 19. A new receiving area will be located on the west side of the building. 20. The proposed addition will total 55,000 square feet in area. 21. The proposed addition will be a maximum of 31.6' feet in height. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must draw its conclusion from the findings of fact based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria and staff listed conclusions are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Government/Public & Commercial uses. The parking lot behind Atomic Foods is designated for commercial uses. The Growth Management Act describes jails as public facilities and as such cannot be excluded from the community. Plan Goal CF-3 states that adequate land should be provided for public facilities. 4 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The public infrastructure is fully developed around the courthouse property. The current facility is operating beyond its capacity with the utilities currently in place. It is not anticipated that the increased size of the County jail, offices and municipal courtrooms will adversely impact public infrastructure. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The proposed addition to the courthouse facilities will be constructed to closely match the character and construction of the jail and public safety building added to the original courthouse a number of years ago. The new addition will incorporate pre-cast concrete panels, brick with glazing to match the existing brick and colored metal panels and trim to tie the color scheme of the new and old buildings together. There will be no public access to the new building from 51h Avenue and the storage yard in the north parking lot will be removed to replace parking lost to the new construction. Public facilities are typically located in or near residential neighborhoods and are an accepted part of the character of residential areas. The courthouse is a major part of the general character of the neighborhood and has been for over 100 years. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The properties surrounding the courthouse complex are generally fully developed. The site design and building design will closely match the existing courthouse buildings. Construction materials and colors are designed to create a unifying theme for the complex to ensure the value of surrounding properties is not impaired. The proposed height of the new building will be about 10 feet taller than the existing jail building but will be similar in height to the Public Safety Building and original courthouse. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or 5 flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The site in question is zoned both C-1 and R-1. The parking lot west of the Atomic Foods building is zoned C-1 and the location of the proposed jail is zoned R-1. The continued use and expansion of the County parking lot may be less objectionable to the neighborhood than many of the permitted uses within the C-1 zone such as automotive repair shops, taverns and restaurants. The proposed new building will essentially be replacing a County courthouse parking lot. The existing courthouse complex has operated without objectionable noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights since 1910. The design of the proposed building with public access restricted from 5th Avenue will continue to ensure the neighborhood is mostly insulated from traffic and noise from the general public. The new receiving area on 5th Avenue with a standby generator could create a noise problem for neighbors to the west unless screened. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposed jail facilities will be operated and maintained by Franklin County. The new courtrooms will be operated by the City of Pasco. The current and ongoing operation of the County courthouse complex has not endangered the public health and safety of the community. A portion of the courthouse complex was and is called the Public Safety Building. The purpose of the building is to assist with providing public safety for the community through the police and court services provided by County and City offices. APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1. The new jail/courtroom/office building must be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan submitted with the Special Permit application 2. The landscaping strip along 5th Avenue shall continue north around the parking lot area at the corner of 51h Avenue and Marie Street. The landscaping strip shall also be placed along Marie Street. Said landscaping areas shall, at minimum, contain 100% lawn. 3. The new generator in the receiving area shall be screened from 5th Avenue with a block wall equal to the height of the generator to provide noise attenuation. 6 4. All safety and architectural lighting on the building shall be shielded to prevent light encroachment onto adjoining properties. 5. Architecture of the additions shall be similar to that of the existing courthouse and correctional facility. 6. Exterior finishing materials shall match that of the existing structure as closely as possible. 7. Any and all parking lot lighting shall be shielded to prevent light encroachment on adjoining lots. 8. Ornamental fencing, matching the existing ornamental fencing, shall extend from the "security building" to the "secure public entry" as indicated on the site plan submitted with the special permit application. 9. The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit has not been obtained by August 1, 2014. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions as contained in the June 21, 2012 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of fact and conclusions that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a Special Permit to Franklin County to expand the County courthouse and correctional facility with conditions as contained in the June 21, 2012 staff report. 7 Vicinity Item: County Jail Expansion A pplicant: Franklin County N Ma p File #. SP2012-011 r+ ir _ + a I� t _4 ARIE ST E ST �,xll�q TAV ON k w , SITE ..o-4...��, -,. _- �-, �"�.� „ __�- ,,�- _..,.c•�p•.. •--" - - _ ,�.„ - 1. A _ 5 Y MARrx ET ST IN _ 4 k p � � Y Expansion Item: Count Jail Land Use A licant: Franklin Count Map pp y• File :# SP2012-011 N Public Office Church Car- Wash Commercial MARIE Lai � � ] �m � Retail Multi-Family OCTAVE ST Res. Residential c d Residential W 94 111111111 ' SITE HENRY ST ARci& N� Multi- d Family b Office G MARGARET ST �Ca�ti f � Park 0 1—T-PTM Offices W � City Hall PARK S 111xO�1 S LFFFF TTMI Hospital NIXON ST Zonin g Item: County Jail Expansion . A licant: Franklin County N pp Map • • File # . SP2012-011 o 1,15 4i � COURT ST BROWN ST MARIE ST OCTAVE ST W "Ad W W 9G SITE HENRY ST x IT Legend 9 xQsR d � c-1 (� 9G no c-3 MARGARET ST 1-1 O�ca'T o T11x IT 0 R-1 0 R-2 �y 0 R-3 PARK ST R-4 _ F2P pEp ti FTTTF] North Side ast Side All TI Cis - n �� .v� � � f ! v �-• ice.' �` ��" a. � AVf .. ��.�� ', !_ b� —•mil- ��� e� ..e � Z �� ib �ie� . r � s ►I�li�iii� iiiiiil f��, South Side � AMW Oat mac.. fi Ot Adak ;i iL IV7 4 .. I At - - h Ike n, 1W .j +•t.y mom �r West i 4 �• f .� I ay 4�. _ 777 -` +f WMI i �p ' 'ds-•6 y� -�er:- ' ��+ s Sir ['�� •+��,�.�4 � ct 7M y '1 ,���.� �. iF�si•,s � it rr ` .. p G = a r�' , Cam! `` ),'� 4J`i{Ni= µrt•.{_� f{iy.Ji g�,;p .. - "'•AAA „ 3- JkA r.. Jy�. C `r,. �'r°,' ,1a�1' _. r .j�.r jar •'` r'.`.--,� +!`%n I�Yr.. le r f - xi �h _ 9t. If _ — e.. i •4 , r =- MEMORANDUM DATE: June 21, 2012 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner SUBJECT: Pasco Family Housing Rezone (MF# Z2012-001) On March 15th of this year, following the public hearing process, the Planning Commission recommended the City Council rezone approximately 3.5 acres of land on North Charles Avenue. The recommendation for the rezone from R-1 (Low Density Residential) and C-1 (Retail Business) included provisions for a concomitant agreement prohibiting all access to the property from Charles Street. Adjoining neighbors appealed the Planning Commission recommendation and the matter was reviewed in a closed record hearing by the City Council on May 7, 2012. Following the initial closed record hearing on May 21, 2012, the City Council remanded the matter to the Planning Commission for the purpose of addressing potential impacts of multi-story structures in proximity to Charles Avenue and the potential impact of the rezone on the Pasco School District. The remand was specific to those issues only. A remand hearing has been scheduled for the June 21, 2012 Planning Commission meeting. No public testimony is to be taken in a remand hearing. Multi-Story Impacts The property in question is currently zoned R-1 and C-1 with 665 feet of frontage along Charles Avenue being zoned R-1 and 185 feet of the frontage zoned C-1. The R-1 District permits houses to be constructed up to 25 feet in height while the C-1 District permits building heights of 35 feet. In both districts the height limit may be increased upon approval of a special permit. Another factor to consider when assessing building height impacts on other properties are setback requirements. The front yard setback in the R-1 District is 20 feet and the front setback in the C-1 District is 15 feet. The proposed R-3 District recommend for the property has a height limit of 35 feet and a setback restriction of 20 feet. This zoning would permit a 10 foot increase in height over the R-1 District but is equal to the building height permitted in the C-1 District. The R-3 front yard setback is equal to the I setback required in the R-1 District and 5 feet greater than the C-1 District. The proposed rezone would provide a small benefit to the property owners on the south end of Charles Avenue in that the front yard setback would be increased by 5 feet. Typical two-story single-family homes are 22 to 24 feet in height as measured to the mid-point on the roof. A typical four-plex is also about 22 to 24 feet in height. The multi-family buildings in the new Bishop Topel development, on Spokane Street, are 24.5 feet in height. The proposed site is large enough for 51 dwelling units under an R-3 designation. Considering the area of land involved and the permitted density there will be little need for a developer to build taller than two-story buildings. Never the less if the property were to be zoned R-3, three-story buildings reaching a height of 35 feet would be permitted; therein lies the concern expressed by the City Council. The Council's concern about building height impacts on the surrounding neighborhood can be addressed by either a restriction on building heights or through an increased setback. The difficulty with the increased setback is the southern half of the site is relatively narrow and with requirements for parking there is little room for any additional setback. The best option for this area of the site would be to limit building heights to 25 feet matching the permitted heights in the surround neighborhood. The northern half of the site is twice the width of the southern half lending itself to the possibility of increased setbacks or a height limitation. School Impacts Based upon information provided to the Planning Commission for multi- family developments, the Pasco School District estimates that each new multi-family unit built in Pasco generates .59 students per unit. The proposed rezone will permit 51 dwelling units to be constructed on the site, generating an additional 30 students (18 elementary, 6 middle school and 6 high school). The same property developed with 20 single- family homes could add 16 new students to the school system (9 elementary, 3 middle school and 4 high school). To address the impacts of new residential development on the Pasco School District the City Council adopted Ordinance #4046 establishing a school impact fee. The School District would receive $94,000 in impact fees if the site developed with 20 single-family dwellings and $230,775 if the site developed with 51 multi-family units. In past correspondence to the City and in the District's Capital Facilities Plan, the School District has indicated impact fees would ensure adequate provisions are made for schools to accommodate residential development. The District has not advised the City that the proposed project/rezone would 2 present unusual or unique circumstances that would not be addressed through the collection of impact fees. The findings and conclusions in the attached report from the March 15, 2012 Planning Commission meeting will need to be modified as follows: Additional Findings 1. The R-1 District permits buildings heights of 25 feet (PMC 25.28) and the C-1 District (PMC 25.42) permits building heights of 35 feet. Therefore the southern 185 feet of the site currently permits three-story or 35 foot tall buildings. Two-story 25 foot tall buildings are currently permitted on the northern portion of the site. 2. The proposed R-3 zoning would permit 35 foot tall buildings on the entire site. 3. The property on the east side of Charles Avenue is zoned R-1 permitting buildings 25 feet in height. Modifications to Staff Report Conclusions (3) There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole. As a whole, the larger community would benefit from the proposed additional housing units permitted by a rezone of the property and the community would benefit from the development clean-up of an underdeveloped neighborhood. In this respect there is merit and value to the proposal. From the prospective of the immediate neighborhood, the completion of neighborhood streets and the elimination of a parcel overgrown with weeds would have merit but the additional traffic would not. The possible concern over permitting building heights over 25 feet in a neighborhood that restricts building heights to 25 feet or less may have an impact of the character and value of the neighborhood. (4) Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. The rezone should be conditioned to limit access to the property in such a manner as to ameliorate the impacts of additional traffic on Charles Avenue. The rezone could be further mitigated to lessen the impact of multi= amilu buildings on the neighborhood bU limiting building heights to match the surrounding residential neighborhood. 3 (5) A concomitant agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. A concomitant agreement is necessary to ensure concerns of increased traffic in the neighborhood are addressed as well as addressing concerns about increased building heights associated with multi family buildings. Recommendation MOTION: I move to adopt the additional Findings of Fact and modified Conclusions therefrom as contained in the staff memo of June 21, 2012. MOTION: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) and R-1 (Low Density Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential), with a concomitant agreement prohibiting access to the property from Charles Street, limiting the height of buildings placed south of the south line of Block 3, Whitehouse Addition to 25 feet and requiring a minimum of 40 feet for a front yard setback for any building over one-story north of the south line of Block 3, Whitehouse Addition. 4 REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO. Z 2012-001 APPLICANT: Pasco Family Housing HEARING DATE: 2/16/2012 12 E. Fifth ACTION DATE: 3/15/2012 Spokane, WA 99202 BACKGROUND REQUEST: REZONE Rezone from R-1 (Low-Density Residential) and C-1 (Retail Business) to R-3 (Medium-Density Residential) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: All of Block 3 Whitehouse Addition and Lots 11-24 Block 2 Whitehouse Addition together with adjoining vacated right-of-way. Location: The west side of Charles Avenue between Adelia Street and Alvina Street. Property Size: 3.58 Acres 2. ACCESS: The property has access from Charles Avenue on the east and Alvina Street from the south. 3. UTILITIES: All utilities are available to the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and C-1 (Retail Business). The site is vacant and contains a block building that was once used as an auto repair shop. Surrounding properties are zoned and developed as follows: North "R-1" Low Density Residential - Highland Park South "R-1" Low Density Residential - Single Family & Vacant East "R-1" Low Density Residential - Single Family West "C-3" General Business - Vacant 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map designates this area for Mixed Residential uses. Goals of the Comprehensive Plan suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community (H-2) and supports efforts to provide affordable housing to meet the needs of low and moderate income households (H-5). Plan Goal LU-2 also encourages the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City of Pasco is the lead agency for this project. Based on the SEPA checklist, the adopted City 1 Comprehensive Plan, City development regulations, and other information, a threshold determination resulting in a Determination of Non-significance (DNS) has been issued for this project under WAC 197- 11-158. This is a non-project action and will therefore have no immediate effect on the Pasco School District. ANALYSIS The property consists of two separate parcels totaling 3.58 acres. The two parcels are divided by the unimproved right-of-way of East George Street. The northern most parcel located between Highland Park on the north and East George Street on the south contains 1.98 acres. The balance of the property is located south of East George Street and westerly of Charles Avenue. This property was platted in lots and block in 1911 and has remained mostly undeveloped since that time. The property north of George Street contained one single-family house which was demolished in 2003. For many years Lots 13- 18 of Block 24 located south of George Street were used as a vehicle storage yard that was filled with broken down and partially dismantled cars, barrels and other items. Lots 19-24 of the same block contained an automotive shop (the shop building still remains on the property) at least one house and a large storage building. In the early 1990's the City required the property owner to remove the slum and blight conditions cause by the impound yard, the accumulation of debris and the substandard buildings located on the property. The property remains undeveloped in a substandard condition today as a result of the lack of infrastructure improvements (no gutter, sidewalk, street lights, storm drainage, etc) and the existence of dead trees, weeds and the dumping that has occurred on the site. The site is located between property that is zoned C-3 (General Commercial) on the west and R-1 (Low Density Residential) on the east. Recognizing sound planning practices often suggest there should be a transition or gradation of land uses from more intense uses to less intense uses the City Council designated the site for mixed residential during the last major Comprehensive Plan update in 2008. The site is currently zoned R-1 and C-1. The C-1 District permits the development retail, office and commercial services such as retail stores, automotive repair shops, tire store, restaurants and taverns. One of the major concerns property owners often have about the location of higher density residential zoning adjacent to low density zoning is the possible impacts the high density zoning may have on the values of properties in adjacent lower density zoning district. A search of the Franklin County Assessor Records in February of 2012 indicates that in many cases this may be 2 more of a perception than a fact. For example the single-family homes that share a common lot line with the Stonegate Apartments have generally increased in value in the last four years. All of the homes in question were constructed two years after the construction of the Stonegate Apartments. Similarly the single-family homes in the Loviisa Farms subdivision constructed directly across Chapel Hill Boulevard from the Sandy Heights RV Park and the Silver Creek Apartments have appreciated in value. It should also be pointed out that the single-family homes located on Charles Avenue were constructed long after the Pasco Housing Authority constructed the multi-family housing units directly to the east. According to the records of the Franklin County Assessor's (2012) the homes in the 300 block of North Charles Avenue have increase in value since they were constructed in 2007. In the cases referenced above it should be noted that the apartment complexes and RV park are not accessed directly from the same street the lower density housing is accessed. The apartment buildings may be considerably higher than the adjoining single-family homes and may impact privacy in rear yards but the traffic impacts are significantly reduced due to the location of access driveways. For example the new multi-family complex built at the southwest corner of Wehe Avenue and Spokane Street is accessed from Spokane Street rather than Wehe Avenue, which fronts future single family residential lots. Even though the property in question is identified in the Comprehensive Plan for mixed use residential development the Planning Commission should consider ways of ameliorating traffic impact to the neighborhood by conditioning where the location of access driveways should be located. The site is large enough to permit the construction 15 to 20 single family homes which would generate 150 to 200 vehicle trips through the neighborhood each day. If the site was developed with 51 apartment units about 336 vehicle trips could be expected in the neighborhood or about 136 more vehicle trips than would be generated by single family homes. Multi-family complexes are often located on or convenient to major streets. The proposed site is accessed only by local streets through the surrounding neighborhood. Bonneville Street and California Avenue are both located on the western edge of the proposed site and could provide an alternate means of accessing the site. If Bonneville Street and other streets to the west were used as the main access there would be little need for traffic from future development on the site to used Charles Avenue or other neighborhood streets to the east. Staff met with the applicant and discussed the issues related to access and as a result of that discussion the applicant has agreed to a concomitant agreement limiting access from the west only. During the initial hearing on this matter the Planning Commission asked staff to provide some information about crime statistics related to low income housing complexes. In a study prepared by the Urban Land Institute (High Density Development Myth 8, Fact 2005) it was reported that crime rates at higher-density developments are not significantly different than crime rates for 3 lower-density development (See Exhibit # 1). Other recent studies confirm the fact that low-income housing does not necessarily cause increases in crime rates (See Exhibit #2 Cornell University Study Abstract). Other studies have considered both the impacts on crime and property values as they related to the development of affordable housing and have concluded affordable housing does not increase crime or reduce neighboring property values (See Exhibit #3 Myths & Facts about Affordable & High Density Housing and Exhibit # 4 Princeton University Study Abstract). (Full copies of the referenced studies are available in the Planning Office.) The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in PMC. 25.88.030. The criteria are list below as follows: 1. The changed conditions in the vicinity which warrant other or additional zoning: • The Comprehensive Plan designation for the property in question was changed from Low Density Residential to Mixed Residential in 2011. • Sewer service was extended north in Charles Avenue from George Street in 2007. • The former auto storage yard on the property has been removed. • All single-family homes have been removed from the property. • The commercially zoned portion of the property has not been used for commercial purposes for approximately 30 years. • The most recent residential development within the vicinity has been the construction of a multi-family complex directly north of the Whittier Elementary School at the southwest corner of Wehe Avenue and Spokane Street. • Much of the commercially zoned property along Oregon Avenue has been developed in the last 20 years. • Commercial development is beginning to extend east of Oregon Avenue. 2. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health, safety and general welfare. The property has remained largely undeveloped for 100 years and has seen a regression in development over the past 25 years with the removal of all housing units and removal of the former automotive repair shop from the property. Rezoning the property to R-3 Medium Density Residential will provide additional flexibility for site development providing a catalyst for the development of the partially improved streets in the neighborhood and providing a buffer between the lower density development to the east and the commercially (C-3) zoned property to the west. 3. The effect it will have on the nature and value of adjoining property and the Comprehensive Plan. 4 The proposal is supported by the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Rezoning the property and eliminating the commercial zoning from the neighborhood could enhance development options for the site benefiting the neighborhood by completing street improvements and eliminating nuisance conditions created by the weeds and dead trees on the property. The rezone would also eliminate any chance for commercial activities to be re-established in the neighborhood. The properties on Charles Avenue east of the commercial zoned portion of the site have decreased in value in recent years per Franklin County records. Based on experience in other neighborhoods where multi-family development has occurred improvements on the site and the property clean-up associated therewith may improve property values in the neighborhood. 4. The effect on the property owners if the request is not granted. The current R-1 and C-1 zoning has been in place for 30 years or more and has not encouraged development on the property and in fact the property has remained largely undeveloped since it was platted 100 years ago. The proposed rezone may provide the property owner with some flexibility for development and may make the installation of streets and utilities more affordable. If the request is not granted it is probable the property will continue to remain vacant as both commercial and single- family development on the property has proven to be unviable. 5. The Comprehensive land use designation for the property. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Mixed Density Residential development. The proposed rezone will bring the zoning into conformance with the Plan. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1) The site is currently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and C-1 retail Business. 2) The property to the west is zoned C-3 and the property to the east is zoned R-1 and R-2. 3) The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Mixed Residential development. 4) The property was platted into lots and blocks 100 years ago. 5) The one remaining house on the site was demolished in 2003. 5 6) The property is vacant and undeveloped except for a vacant block building formerly used as an automotive shop. 7) Commercial use of the C-1 portion of the site has not occurred for approximately 30 years. 8) The site has never been improved with standard streets, curb, gutter, storm drainage and other infrastructure typical of an urban setting. 9) Multi-family duplex units are located directly east of the homes in the 300 block of Charles Street. 10) The multi-family duplex units directly east of the homes in the 300 block of Charles Street were constructed in 1978. 11) According to the records (2012) of the Franklin County Assessor's office the homes in the 300 block of Charles Avenue have increase in value. 12) According to the records (2012) of the Franklin County Assessor's office the homes in the 200 block of Charles Avenue east of the commercial portion of the site and not sharing a common property line with multi- family housing have decreased in value in recent years. 13) Single-family residential homes developed in the Loviisa Farms subdivision across Chapel Hill Boulevard from the 200 unit Silver Creek Apartment complex and the Sandy Heights RV park have increased in value (per Franklin County records 2012) in recent years. 14) The single-family homes on Klickitat Lane sharing a common property line with the 200 unit Stonegate apartment complex were constructed after the Stonegate Apartments were constructed. The homes on Klickitat lane have increased in value (per Franklin County records 2012) in recent years. 15) Studies prepared by the Urban Land Institute, Cornell University, Princeton University, and the California Department of Housing and Community Development (Higher Density Development Myth and Facts, 2005; Low Income Housing Development and Crime, Cornell University 2010; Do Affordable Housing Projects harm Suburban Communities? Crime, Property Values and Property Taxes in Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 2011; Myths and Facts About Affordable & High Density Housing, 2002. Full copies of these reports are on file in the Planning Office.) 16) As the result of Commercial development along Oregon Avenue over the past 20 years few properties are left to develop on Oregon Avenue. Remaining vacant commercial properties east of Oregon Avenue toward Highland Park and the site in question are beginning to develop. 17) If a 51 apartment unit apartment complex was developed on the site it would generate 136 more vehicle trips per day than if the site was developed with 20 single-family homes. 6 CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a rezone, the Planning Commission must develop its conclusions from the findings of fact based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.88.060 and determine whether or not: (1) The proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the development of old and new neighborhoods into safe and enjoyable places to live (Goal LU-2). The Comprehensive Plan also encourages the development of a variety of residential environments (Goal H-2) and the Plan and supports efforts to provide affordable housing to meet the needs of low and moderate income households (Goal H-5). (2) The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will not be materially detrimental. The property in question has remained largely undeveloped for the past 100 years. Rezoning the property may provide some flexibility for development options which could lead to the improvement of the streets and utilities in the neighborhood thereby improving conditions in the neighborhood that have only been partially developed over the past 100 years. The proposed rezone is being requested to allow the construction of up to 51 apartment units. Fifty-one apartment units would generate (per the ITE Trip Generation Manual 8th Edition) approximately 136 more vehicle trips on local streets than a 20 unit single-family development. The additional traffic could be viewed by the neighborhood as having a detrimental impact on the neighborhood. (3) There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a whole. As a whole the larger community would benefit from the proposal additional housing units permitted by a rezone of the property and the community would benefit from the development clean-up of an underdeveloped neighborhood. In this respect there is merit and value to the proposal. From the prospective of the immediate neighborhood the completion of neighborhood streets and the elimination of a parcel overgrown with weeds would have merit but the additional traffic would not. (4) Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant adverse impacts from the proposal. 7 The rezone should be conditioned to limit access to the property in such a manner as to ameliorate the impacts of additional traffic on Charles Avenue. (5) A concomitant agreement should be entered into between the City and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an agreement. A concomitant agreement is necessary to ensure concerns of increased traffic in the neighborhood are addressed. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to adopt Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in the March 15, 2012 staff report. MOTION: I move, based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Rezone from C-1 (Retail Business) and R-1 (Low Density Residential) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential), with a concomitant agreement prohibiting access to the property from Charles Street. 8 Vicinity Item: Rezone R- 1 to R-3 Applicant: Pasco Family Housing IV N Map File #. Z 2012-001 jr SIP k Aw Ord .y ► �. l < X �. 1 i E .s `�. i - �, ADELIA SiT to F r SITE W , 1 F bTEORGE ST• W s ; W — Q 'A W ui ui a m•. NN �► .vs �, ALV1, -ST. s# Y - 1 I ' Z ^ 0�1 41V , E LEWF�S T ° Land Item: Rezone R- I to R-3 Use Applicant: Pasco Family Housing IV N Map File Z 2012-001 II�� III . . . � • � � � � � � MW zoning Map Applicant: Pasco Family Housing IV N File Z 2012-001 II�� III . . . � • � � � � � � � s rit � M I iX I Vii . mob ' . I '. � � , . Y '�� • _ � < y>- _ � � s . a� ' � � < Y.� A l � �_ n Y � � � �. �. - .- . ,�: 6zv < ' . � � / .:- � �® , :s '7 , , �: ",� - �i � � , �. � fi � � • ,. • b • — ii � . i I i t � �bl , � .� �} }�i �P r,�q�. Y '�A�~-.'M. ' .. �;� � , i *-� ' -- 4 %� _ | & . r 0 o Y • J . r �� J ;��` ��;',.' � �,:�; :_ a.�.�`'_ ;;� : ? =�: � , , ` , ,, �? r -, c . � - _ 0 �. ara 0 c� �, ; rr , i i " ; , '�- MEMORANDUM DATE: June 11, 2013 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator SUBJECT: 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ALLOCATION (MF#BGAP2012-003) Requests for Funding Attached for your review and consideration are the CDBG Fund and Proposal Summaries (Attachments I &2)relating to our Community Development Block Grant Program for program year 2013. Seventeen (17) requests for funds were submitted totaling $2,816,091. Each applicant will present their proposal before the Planning Commission, June 21, 2012. Estimated Funds Available It is estimated that the 2013 annual entitlement grant will be $580,000 based on the award for program year 2012. Prior year funds available for commitment are $121,986 making a total of $701,986 in funds available for use in 2013. There is always some question regarding actual funding levels approved by Congress. Actual available funding for these FY 2013 activities will remain in question until the early part of the year when the CDBG allocation is made by Congressional resolution. If funding levels are lower than estimated, activity funding may need to be reallocated accordingly. Public Service Cap HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support public service activities may not exceed 15% of the combined total of the entitlement plus the prior year's program income. For 2013, the estimated entitlement of$580,000, and estimated 2012 program income of$2,000 makes the maximum available for public service activities $87,000. Current requests for public services total $1,502,787. Staff recommends a maximum of$70,000 for public services (12%). Planning & Administration Cap HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support planning and administration activities may not exceed 20%of the combined total of the entitlement plus the current year's program income. For 2013, the estimated entitlement of $580,000 makes the maximum available for planning and administration $116,000. Current requests for planning and administration total $120,000. Staff recommends a maximum of $116,000 for planning and administration (20%). The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. /arp Attachments: 1. 2013 CDBG Fund Summary 2. 2013 CDBG Proposal Summary Attachment 1 2013 CDBG Fund Summary-06.21.12 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 Proposals-Recommendations(2) PJI LOC RECIPIENT ACTIVITY I AGENCY NAME NonCDBG Agency Staff PC GoalStr Risk Priority D ID Match Requested Recommend City of Pasco-Community&Economic 1 1 Development CDBG Program Administration 0.00 120,000.00 ALL 2 Al City of Pasco-Administrative&Community 2 2 Services Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist 45,500.00 37,500.00 V 3 B2 City of Pasco-Administrative&Community Martin Luther King Community Center 2 3 Services Recreation Specialist 100,500,00 37,500.00 V 3 B2 City of Pasco-Administrative&Community Senior Citizen's Center Recreation 2 4 Services Specialist 200,500.00 37,500.00 V 3 B2 2 5 Charity Training Center Anti-Gang Preventionlintervention Program 100,000.00 1,365,582.50 V 12 62 2 6 Charity Training Center Youth Organic Farmers/Produce Coop 15,000.00 24,704.00 1 12 B2 3 7 Downtown Pasco Development Authority Pasco Specialty Kitchen 47,066.00 65,000.00 1 3 A2 Downtown Fagade Improvement(2 3 8 Downtown Pasco Development Authority fagades) 15,000.00 60,000.00 1 10 A2 Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services 4 9 Catholic Family&Child Services-Pasco (7) 67,194.00 4,000.00 IV 2 Bi Community Housing Improvement Minor 4 14 Benton Franklin CAC-Horne Energy Rehab Program 50,000.00 IV 1 B1 Benton Franklin CAC-Homeless 4 15 Prevention Program Homebase Affordable Housing 100,000.00 160,000.00 IV 4 61 City of Pasco-Administrative&Community 4 17 Services LID Assistance LID#149 0.00 99,000.00 11 1 Al Boys&Girls Club of Benton&Franklin Boys&Girls Club-Renovations and ADA 5 10 Counties Accessibility 10,800.00 155,800.00 III 1 Al AmeriCorps Kurtzman Park Splash Pad 5 11 Regional Service Corps-AmeriCorps (wading pool replacement) 0.00 101,504.18 111 9 All 5 13 City of Pasco-Public Works ADA Improvements 0.00 250,000.00 H 2 Al City of Pasco-Administrative&Community ACS Kurtzman Park Spray Park(swimming 5 16 Services pool replacement)-Design 50,000.00 200,000.00 111 5 Al City of Pasco-Community&Economic 6 12 Development Code Enforcement Officer 147,000.00 48,000.00 IV 1 Al 898,560.00 2,816,090.68 Estimated Entitlement 2012 $ 580,000 Estimated P1 2012 $ - Available to Commit $ 121,986 Total Funds Available ! $� Proposals Received $ 2,816,091 SURPLUSIDEFICIT $ (2,114,105) Proposals Recommended $ Funds available for Commitment 701,9 6.006.00 671512012 Attachment 1 2013 CDBG Fund Summary - 06.21.12 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 Reallocate-Carryover RECIPIENT ACTIVITY PY HUD ID BALANCE DRAWN THRU CARRY OVER REALLOCATE Downtown Pasco Development Authority- FACADE IMPROVEMENT DPDA PROGRAM 2009 266 $ 78,000.00 $ 15,135.03 $ 62,864.97 $ - TOTAL 1 $ 78,000.00 1 $ 62,864.97 $ - 6/13/2012 Attachment 1 2013 CDBG Fund Summary 06.21.12 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 Public Service Cap PJID LOC RECIPIENT ACTIVITY 1 AGENCY NAME NonCDBG Agency Staff ID Match Requested Recommend City of Pasco-Administrative& Civic Center-Youth Recreation 2 2 Community Services. Specialist $45,500.00 $37,500.00 $20,000.00 City of Pasco-Administrative& Martin Luther King Community 2 1 3 Community Services Center Recreation Specialist $100,500.00 $37,500.00 $20,000.00 City of Pasco-Administrative& Senior Citizen's Center 2 4 Community Services Recreation Specialist $200,500.00 $37,500.00 $30,000.00 Anti-Gang Prevention/ 2 5 Charity Training Center Intervention Program $100,000.00 $1,365,582.50 $0.00 Youth Organic 2 6 Charity Training Center Farmers/Produce Coop $15,000.00 $24,704.00 $0.00 $461,500.00 $1,622,786.50 $70,000.00 Entitlement(2012 Estimated) $ 580,000 Prior Year(2011) Program Income $ 2,000 Total Funds Subject to Public Services Cap $ 582,000 Public Services Cap (Maximum) $ 87,300 15% Public Services Requested $ 1,622,787 279% Public Services Recommended $ 70,000 12% 6/13/2012 Attachment 1 2013 CDBG Fund Summary - 06.21.12 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 4 Admin Cap PJID LOC RECIPIENT ACTIVITY I AGENCY NAME NonCDBG Agency Staff ID Match Requested Recommend City of Pasco-Community& 1 1 Economic Development CDBG Program Administration $0.00 $120,000.00 $116,000.00 $0.00 1 $120,000.00 1 $116,000.00 Entitlement(2012 Estimated) $ 580,000 Program Income(2012 Estimated) Total Funds Subject to Public Services Cap $ 580,000 Planning &Admin Cap (Maximum) $ 116,000 20% Planning &Admin Requested $ 116,000 20% Planning &Admin Recommended $ 116,000 20% 6/13/2012 Attachment 1 2413 CDBG Fund Summary- 06.21.12 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 5 Powerpoint Agency ACTIVITY Non CDBG Agency Match Requested City of Pasco-Community& Economic Development CDBG Program Administration 0.00 120,000.00 City of Pasco-Administrative& Community Services Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist 45,500.00 37,500.00 City of Pasco-Administrative&Community Services Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist 100,500.00 37,500.00 City of Pasco-Administrative&Community Services Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist 200,500.00 37,500.00 Charity Training Center Anti-Gang Prevention/Intervention Program 100,000.00 1,365,552.50 Charity Training Center Youth Organic Farmers/Produce Coop 15,000.00 24,704.00 Downtown Pasco Development Authority Pasco Specialty Kitchen 47,066.00 65,000.00 Downtown Pasco Development Authority Downtown Fagade Improvement(2 fagades) 15,000.00 60,000.00 Catholic Family&Child Services-Pasco Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services(7) 67,194.00 4,000.00 Benton Franklin CAC-Home Energy Community Housing Improvement Minor Rehab Program 50,000.00 Benton Franklin CAC-Homeless Prevention Program Homebase Affordable Housing 100,000.00 160,000.00 City of Pasco-Administrative&Community Services LID Assistance LID#149-HOLD FOR NEXT PY 2014 0.00 99,000.00 Boys&Girls Club of Benton& Franklin Counties Boys&Girls Club-Renovations and ADA Accessibility 10,800.00 155,800.00 Regional Service Corps-AmedCorps AmeriCorps Kurtzman Park Splash Pad(wading pool replacement) 0.00 101,504.18 City of Pasco-Public Works ADA Improvements 0.00 250,000.00 City of Pasco-Administrative&Community Services ACS Kurtzman Park Spray Park(swimming pool replacement)- Design 0.00 200,000.00 City of Pasco-Community& Economic Development Code Enforcement Officer 147,000.00 48,000.00 848,560.00 2,816,490.68 611312012 Type Goal Amount Planning & Administratio Mandatory $ 120,000 Economic Opportunities I $ 125,000 Community Infrastructure II $ 250,000 Public Facilities III $ 457,304 Code Enforcement IV $ 48,000 Decent Housing N, VI, VII $ 303,000 Public Services V $ 1,502,787 Planning & Economic Opportunities ■Planning&Administration Administration 1 $125,000 Mandatory Mandatory, $120,000 ■ Economic Opportunities I Community In 11, ■Community Infrastructure II $250,000 ■ Public Facilities III ■Code Enforcement IV Decent Housing IV,VI,VII Jbiic Facilities li - Public Services V !%'ublic Services V, 7,304 $1,502,787 Code Enforcement IV, $48,000 Decent Housing IV, VI, VII, $303,000 Attachment 2 Page 1 CITY OF PASCO 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JUNE 21, 2012 1 CDBG Program Administration Requested: $120,000 Recommended: Plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. Planning and Administration is capped at no greater than 20%. 2 Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist—Requested: $ 37,500 Recommended: Provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Youth Civic Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for youth at risk and families in low-to-moderate income Census Tract (202). Public services arc capped at no greater than 15% of current entitlement plus prior year program income. 3 Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist— Requested: $ 37,500 Recommended: Provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Martin Luther Ding. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to at risk school age , youth, and families in Census Tract (201). Public services are capped at no greater than 15% of current entitlement plus prior year program income. 4 Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist—Requested: $ 37,500 Recommended: Portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly of Pasco with support services,nutrition, health and living skills support. Public services are capped at no greater than 15% current entitlement plus prior year program income. Attachment 2 Page 2 CITY OF PASCO 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JUNE 21,2012 5 Anti-Gang Prevention/Intervention Program—Requested: $1,365,583 Recommended: Establish relevant anti-gang prevention programs to meet the needs of low-income gang/anti-gang members and their families in the ecommunity. New public service activity, funds requested exceed the public service cap. 6 Youth Organic Farmers/Produce Coop —Requested: $ 24,704 Recommended: Provide start-up funds for organic farmers Youth Co-op. USDA certified organic producers on donated land, funds wil be used for planting to harvest. Products will be sold on the open market and to independent food stores and food chains. Work with Pasco Commercial Kithen for technical support,marketing New public service activity, funds requested exceed the public service cap. 7 Pasco Specialty Kitchen—Requested: $ 65,000 Recommended: Continue operations of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, a certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical support to small food-related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance, the startup businesses agree to make jobs created available to low-to-moderate income persons in Pasco (Census Tract 202). 8 Downtown Facade Improvement (2 facades)—Requested: $ 602000 Recommended: Support downtown businesses with fagade improvements (Census Tract 202). It is estimated that 2 business will be assisted with fagade improvements. 9 Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services (7)—Requested_: $ 4,000 Recommended: Provide minor ADA accessibility remodels, repairs and construct wheelchair ramps for very low to low income households. This population includes elderly and disabled (City-wide). It is estimated that 7 elderly households, typically very low income, will be assisted. Attachment 2 Page 3 CITY OF PASCO 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JUNE 21, 2012 10 Boys & Girls Club - Renovations and ADA Accessibility—Requested: $155,800 Recommended: Renovate the learning center and office area which is the last area of the building that remains to be improved. 11 AmeriCorps Kurtzman Park Splash Pad (wading pool replacement)— Requested: $101,504 Recommended: Replace inoperable wading pool in Kurtzman Park with a new Splash Pad. 12 Code Enforcement Officer—Re uested: $ 48,000 Recommended: Provide partial salary for one of three code enforcement officers to help improve neighborhood appearance and for compliance with rules and regulations dealing with homeowner needs in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204). 13 ADA Improvements—Requested: $250,000 Recommended- Retrofit handicap access ramps for disabled persons with ramps that meet current ADA accessibility codes. Handicap ramps retrofit city-wide 14 Community Housing Improvement Minor Rehab Program—Requested: $ 50,000 Recommended: Minor household repairs, energy efficient upgrades and hazardous material removal for low to moderate income households. Recommend this project for minor rehabilitation/repair for those with housing costs over 30% of monthly income, and income below 50% AMI. Attachment 2 Page 4 CITY OF PASCO 2013 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JUNE 21,2012 15 Homebase Affordable Housing—Requested: $150,000 Recommended: Purchase a four plex in Pasco for the purpose of providing affordable housing for 4 low/very low income families with small children who are otherwise unable to attain suitable housing. Recommend this project for acquisition affordable housing for those below 50% AMI move forward to secure non-CDBG funding to complete the project. 16 ACS Kurtzman Park Surat/ Park(swimming pool replacement)—Requested: $200,000 Recommended: Replace swimming pool in Kurtzman Park with a new Splash Park. 17 LIT) Assistance LID #149—Requested: S 94,000 Recommended: Pay special assessment for LID #149 low-income households. 2013 Projects and Activities - Requested 0001 Project Administration SUM ,$120,000.00 Activity Activity MatrixXitation. Nat Objective Obj Outcome Proposed Requested NonCDBG 01 CDSG Program 21A 570.206 N/A 570.205 SLE Availability/Accessibility 0 $120,000.00 $0.00 Administration GoalStratObj: o StrategyDese: Program Administration Table3Desc: Plan,administer and deliver housing and community needs,ensure compliance with local,state and federal rules, regulations and laws,and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. 0002 Public Services SUM $1,502,786.50 Activity Activity MatrixXitation Nat Objective Obj Outcome Proposed Requested NonCDBG 02 Civic Center-Youth 05D 570.201(e) LMA 570.208(x)(1) SLE Availability/Accessibility 5640 $37,500.00 $45,500.00 Recreation Specialist GoalStratObj: v StrategyDesc: (2)Support activities that provide for appropriately located,effective,and timely service to priority needs populations. Table3Dese: Provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Youth Civic Center.This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for youth at risk and families in low-to-moderate income Census Tract(202). 03 Martin Luther King 0517 570.201(e) LMA 570.208(x)(1) SLE Availability/Accessibility 5805 $37,500.00 $100,500.00 Community Center Recreation Specialist GoalStratObj: v StrategyDese: (2)Support activities that provide for appropriately located,effective,and timely service to priority needs populations. TabWDesc: Provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Martin Luther King.This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA,Salvation Army and Campfire USA,who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to at risk school age,youth,and families in Census Tract(201). 04 Senior Citizen's Center 05A 570.201(e) LMC 570.208(a)(2) SLE Availability/Accessibility 1500 $37,500.00 $200,500.00 Recreation Specialist GoalStratObj: v StrategyDese: (2)Support activities that provide for appropriately located,effective,and timely service to priority needs populations. Table3Desc: Portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly of Pasco with support services,nutrition,health and living skills support. Wednesday,June 13,2012 Page I of 5 05 Anti-Gang 051 570.201(e) LMC 570.208(a)(2) SLE AvailabilitylAccessibility 170 $1,365,582.50 $100,000.00 Prevention/Intervention Program GoalStratObj: v StrategyDesc: (2)Support activities that provide for appropriately located,effective,and timely service to priority needs populations. Table3Desc: Establish relevant anti-gang prevention programs to meet th needs of low-income gang/anti-gang members and their families in th ecommunity. 06 Youth Organic 05H 570201(e) LMC 570.208(x)(2) EO Availability/Accessibility $24,704.00 $15,000.00 Farmers/Produce Coop GoalStratObj: I StrategyDese: (4)Support training and work-skills programs/projects that prepare lower-income workers to be gainfully employed in local industries and businesses. Table3Desc: Provide start-up funds for organic farmers Youth Co-op. USDA certified organic producers on donated land,funds wil be used for planting to harvest. Products will be sold on the open market and to independent food stores and food chains.Work with Pasco Commercial Kithen for technical support„marketing 0003 Economic Opportunities SUM ,$125,000.00 Activity Activity MatrixJCitation Nat Objective Obj Outcome Proposed Requested NonCDBG 07 Pasco Specialty Kitchen 18B 670.201(o)(ii) LMJ 570208(a)(4) EO Sustainability $65,000.00 $47„066.00 GoalStratObj: l StrategyDesc: (1)Provide assistance to existing or new micro-enterprises and other businesses to hire or retain lower-income workers and/or lower-income business owners. (2)Support retentioln or recruitment actions to ensure that essential business can provide services to an area that has a majority of lower-income persons or in an area with 20%or more of its populations'income at or above the poverty level.(3)Support incentives to businesses newly locating to an area that is underdeveloped,degraded or blighted that will create jobs and add stability to the area.(4)Support training and work-skills programslprojects that prepare lower- income workers to be gainfully employed in local industries and businesses.(5)Support a range of eligible economic development needs in targeted Redevelopment Strategy Areas such as Pasco's Downtown area. Table3Desc: Continue operations of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen,a certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical support to small food-related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance,the startup businesses agree to make jobs created available to low-to-moderate income persons in Pasco(Census Tract 202). 08 Downtown Fagade 14E 570.202 LMA 570.208(a)(1) EO Sustainability 2 $60,000.00 $15,000.00 Improvement(2 fagades) GoalStratObj: i StrategyDesc: (5)Support a range of eligible economic development needs in targeted Redevelopment Strategy Areas such as Pasco's Downtown area. Table3Desc: Support downtown businesses with fagade improvements(Census Tract 202). Wednesday,June 13,2012 Page 2 of 5 0004 Decent Housing SUM $303,000.00 Activity Activity MatrixlCitation Nat Objective Obj Outcome Proposed Requested NonCD.BG 09 Catholic Family Volunteer 14A 570.202 LMH 570.208(a)(3) DH Availability/Accessibility 12 $4,000.00 $67,194.00 Chore Services(7) GoalStratObj: IV StrategyDesc: (2)Sustain or improve the quality of existing affordable housing stock.(Support acquisition or rehabilitation,code enforement,energy efficiency improvements,of new construction in targeted neighborhoods.) Table3Desc: Provide minor ADA accessibility remodels,repairs and construct wheelchair ramps for very low to low income households.This population includes elderly and disabled(City-wide). 14 Community Housing 14A 570.202 LMH 570.208(aX3) DH Affordability 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Improvement Minor Rehab Program GoalStratObj: IV StrategyDesc: (2)Sustain or improve the quality of existing affordable housing stock.(Support acquisition or rehabilitation,code enforement,energy efficiency improvements,or new construction in targeted neighborhoods.) Table3Desc: Minor household repairs,energy efficient upgrades and hazardous material removal for low to moderate income households. 15 Homebase Affordable 01 570.201(a) LMH 570.208(x)(3) DH Affordability 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 Housing GoalStratObj: VI StrategyDesc: (1)Support services that assist the homeless to move toward self-sufficiency.(Support efforts to obtain funds and resources to increas the supply of transition and permanent housing and vouchers for homeless persons). Table3Dese: Purchase a four plex in Pasco for the purpose of providing affordable housing for 4 low/very low income families with small children who are otherwise unable to attain suitable housing. 17 LID Assistance LID#149 13 570.201(n) LMH 570.208(x)(3) DH Affordability 0 $99,000.00 $0.00 GoalStratObj: ii StrategyDesc: (1)Expand or improve basic community infrastructure in lower-income neighborhoods while minimizing costs to households below 80%of area median income. Table3Desc: Pay special assessment for LID#149 for low-income households. Friday,June 15,2012 Page 3 of 5 0005 Public Facilility Improvements sum $457,304.18 Activity Activity MatrixlCitation Nat Objective Obj Outcome Proposed Requested NonCDBG 10 Boys&Girls Club- 03E 570.201(c) LMA 570.208(x)(1) SLE Availability/Accessibility 1 $155,800.00 $10,800.00 Renovations and ADA Accessibility GoalStrat ft: In StrategyDesc: (1)Support revitalization of neighborhoods by improving and supporting public facilities that serve low-and moderate-income neighborhoods and households. Table3Desc: Replace renovate the[earning center and office area which is the last area of the building that remains to be improved. 11 AmeriCorps Kurtzman Park 03F 570.201(c) LIMA 570.208(a)(1) SLE Availability/Accessibility 0 $101,504.18 $0.00 Splash Pad(wading pool replacement) GoalStratObj: nl StrategyDesc: (2)Improve parks and recreation facilities in targeted neighborhoods. Table3Desc: Replace inoperable wading pool in Kurtzman Park with a new Splash Pad. 16 ACS Kurtzman Park Spray 03F 570.201(c) LIMA 570.208(x)(1) SLE Availability/Accessibility 0 $200,000.00 $50,000.00 Park(swimming pool replacement) GoalStrat ft: In StrategyDesc: (2)Improve parks and recreation facilities in targeted neighborhoods. Table3Desc: Replace swimming pool in Kurtzman Park with a new Splash Park. 0006 Code Enforcement SUM $48,000.00 Activity Activity MatrixXitation Nat Objective Obj Outcome Proposed Requested NonCDBG 12 Code Enforcement Officer 15 570.202(c) LMA 570.208(a)(1) DH Sustainability 0 $48,000.00 $147,000.00 GoalStratObj: Iv StrategyDesc: (1)Add to the existing stock of affordable housing units by developing owner-occupied and rental housing with in-fill areas or targeted neighborhoods,consistent with local comprehensive plans.(Develop new units or provide gap financing of construction,support local Section 8 rental assistance efforts) Table3Desc: Provide partial salary for one of three code enforcement officers to help improve neighborhood appearance and for compliance with rules and regulations dealing with homeowner needs in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods(Census Tracts 201,202,203 and 204). Wednesday,June 13,2012 Page 4 of 5 0007 Community Infrastructure SUM $250,000.00 Activity Activity Matrix/Citation Nat Objective Obj Outcome Proposed Requested NonCDBG 13 ADA Improvements 03L 570.201(c) LMA 570.208(a)(1) SLE Availability/Accessibility 0 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 GoalStratObj: it StrategyDesc: (2)Improve Access for persons with disabilities and the elderly by improving streets and sidewalk systems. TabWDesc: Retrofit handicap access ramps for disabled persons with ramps that meet current ADA accessibility codes. $2,806,090.68 $1,248,560.00 Wednesday,June 13,2012 Page 5 of 5 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND AGENCY: City of Pasco-Community& Economic Development RECEIVED PROJECT TITLE: CDBG Program Administration JUN 0 J 201_ ADDRESS: 525 N Third Avenue PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: City-Wide OMM"ITY& EGONDrilc DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Rick White,Community& Economic Development Director E-MAIL: whiter@,pasco-wa.aov PHONE: 509-545-3441 FAX: 509-545-3499 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 120,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 0 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): All CDBG activities in Pasco benefit primarily low-moderate income persons. Census tracts 201, 202, 203 BG 3&4 and 204 are 71% LMI, there are 24,190 persons, 17,171 of`,which are LMI. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: CDBG funds are used to plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. 3, CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) ALL GOALS 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section lI in Allocation Policy): Priority: ❑A ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: ALL PRIORITIES This activity serves every type of eligible activity allowable under CDBGfHOME/NSP regulations. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: On-going g ctivity 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: CDBG entitlement grant planning and administration costs such as salaries and supplies. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑YES ED NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE)— ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)124 CFR 570.203: 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 1 ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFA 570.202(c): ® Planning 24 CFR 570205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) N/A 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)[] Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? Pasco has been an entitlement since 1994 If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? As long as Pasco is an entitlement city, CDBG fiends will be utilized for planning-and administration of the grant. 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service, or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011. 2010 Pasco $ 120,000 S 112,000 $ 110,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? Funding is provided from other Grantors such as NSP and HOME for administration of those projects 01 CDBG Administration Page 2 CENSUS BLOCK "LOW DERATE� e •t r ► ti 201 ALL 74.6 i 4 i rt 6&8 rf r/ +t i rr 1 l/ +/r i 202 ALL 75.0 100 86.1 200 58.3 i + r r 203 ALL 628 rr 76.9 200 124 ;�JJ� .�• .. .� ri 75.0 rrili� 'i/+ , fl 1 204 ALL 69.8 'o 100 823 200 525 -141 300 88.4 500 600 564 Jf Jr + �.f/,J err .f+ % io wf■���� !/�Ji irr�/ jiff/riJlY/yr ` �irf(l��ir 10 op P, X10 0 yr•i� rJS/1.y20 �I/ %xo" //% I ill l �rJa-r�rr✓✓ �rrli/, /// r// J/JJ//.IJ/,. ,fir y �/ err+r�rrr �:.•. t �I.�IJ/ �t�/� *fir •• ��* �//� �J/./� f1r Vii/ l�I���- ��, LEI�ovoo!//Jljrr.%' �sr r� f ✓ /JJ �/1/�. �•irrr �/IJ"r/riilr�/i�•Ji %✓r/firs+ f/�frr'%,rte,,%%; /rrl��Il�ri•Jr�rii.r./°�..lJ�r.r:./r r �/ j J I/r �i •i�I�/.r/r Ye I f,�j!�/.�• �� fr"t:%J%J`Jr�//� /�J�firlf ;'l/s %J%J !/`+I/s"r, /�� 1 �/i!' �j ��/r%�/+►/+� �/ '7�J' ' .+Yr !! +r // / t/r'f '/r" rr , ✓ J%JJJ'."/fJ✓✓� ;l,,mfr/rJi r. � { !!r y //� *,.'i,►p.. 1/,/,�,JJ � r�/�/ / rrirJ r I //i:. / •r+ /rr�/r rii+ r`•r / IJr�j '/ !�! /� r�j/ '-� . i !!!/rJ� JI .JJ/•.�/Ir�.i ��/1'J�`` l�/,�/`/f� �f ! �,r// ''/'/��/Jii;///I:IfJ f r� %/�'/'r%r� '� �►JI�f/ �ji� / � / J V I f Y.• J� / ' oll `f 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if an 1-2012 Jan-Mar Closeout prior year grant and prepare Consolidated Plan Evaluation Report Complete environmental review for current program year awarded projects Execute subreci Tent agreements and fund activities for drawdown Q2-2012 Apr-Jun Prepare Request for Proposal for next grant year Q3-2012 Jul-Sep Desk and Site Monitoring of all activities Reporting Budget Q4-2012 Oct-Dec Submit Annual Action Plan for next grant year Timeliness 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries&Benefits 85,095 OPERATIONS: 0 Admin Services Fees $12,000 Advertising 950 Utilities 1,000 Supplies 3,050 Professional Development 5,800 CONSTRUCTION: 0 Architectural 0 Engineering 0 Materials 0 Project Delivery 0 Professional Services 12,125 PROPERTY: 0 Purchase price 0 Closing cost 0 OTHER:(describe) 0 Administrative Expenses 0 TOTAL S $120,000.00 $ $ Additional explanation of the above budget:. Salaries and benefits includes other staff hours for environmental review and labor compliance. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? HUD allows for up to 20%of the entitlement to be utilized for planning and administrating the Block Grants.Networking and training are very important aspects of this activity,however,professional development/professional services may need to be abandoned. 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 1 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES -List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: []Person,or by❑Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median Number of clients below 50%median Number of clients below 80%median Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Total Number of Pasco residents served (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? 2012 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland I Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,I00 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median 1 $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use FDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Rick White,Comm& Ec Dev Director Angela Pitman,Block Grant Admin Mailing Address 525 N Third Avenue 525 N Third Avenue City/State Pasco,WA 99301 Pasco,WA 99301 Phone/Fax 509-545-3441,'509-545-3499 509-543-5739 Email whiterCamasco-wa.Rov SUBMITTED BY: Rick White L,,�,_ Community&Econ Development Director �,r (a f Z_ Signature of Authorized Official Title Date 01 CDBG Administration Page 2 1 ' ' RECEIVED 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO MAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND C0141UNiTy & ECON0611C DEVELOPPU4) AGENCY: City of Pasco—Administrative&Community Services PROJECT TITLE: Civic Center—Youth Recreation Specialist ADDRESS: 525 N Third Ave PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 525 N Third Ave(21202) AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Rick Ter-way,Director A&CS E-MAIL: —terwayr@pasco-wa.gov PHONE: 509-543-5757 FAX: 509-543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 37,500 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:S 45,500 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): There are a significant number of youth from low to moderate income families who are considered at-risk that benefit from participating in supervised recreation programs 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Salary for staff to operate programs for at-risk youth. Clientele are low-moderate income minority youths. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal Support Priority Public Services Strategy V.2 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ❑A NB ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: B2 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Jqniu 1-December 31 2013 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Staff salary&benefits 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? []YES N NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): N Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)i24 CFR 570.203: 2013 Civic Ctr CDBG App.docx Page 1 ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570105: ❑ Other describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)N Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone N Census Tract# 202 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): ❑Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other:. 4) 1 Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slurn/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? MYes [gNo Year program began? If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? Anticipate CDBG funding in 2014 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: N Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 30,000 Richland $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal'? 2013 Civic Clr CDBG App.docx Page 2 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: 2013 Civic Ctr CDBG App.docx Page 3 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if an Jan 1 —Dec 31 2013 Pasco City Hall after school program serves youth who are low to moderate income with a variety of meaningful team and individual activities such as rock wall climbing, basketball,soccer and board games.This pro rovides youth in the community an opportunity to gather in a place that is clean,safe and positive place to be. 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 55,000 37,500 17,500 City Gen Funds Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities 28,000 28,000 City Gen Fund Supplies CTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY:. Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $ 83,000 $ 37,500 S 45,500 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? 2013 Civic Ctr CDBG App.docx Page 4 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ©Person,or by[]Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 38 Number of clients below 50%median 300 Number of clients below 80%median 60 Number of elderly clients 0 Number of minority clients 295 Total Number of Pasco residents served 298 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Daily roster sheet _ 2012 HUD income Limit_Guidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Mailing Address _ City/State Phone/Fax Email SUBMITTED BY: ;�? 12- Signature of AuthorilVd Official Title Date 2013 Civic Or CDBG App.docz Page 5 1. RECEIVED MAY 2 1 2012 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG}Of=W1404ITY& ECON0611C DEVELOPf,1ENI AGENCY: City of Pasco—Administrative&Community Services PROJECT TITLE: Martin Luther King Comm Ctr- Recreation Specialist ADDRESS: 525 N Third Ave PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 205 S Wehe (21.201) AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Rick Terway,Director A&CS E-MAIL: terwayroapasco-wa.gov PHONE: 509-543-5757 FAX: 509-543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 37,500 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 100,500 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): There are a significant number of youth from low to moderate income families who are considered at-risk that benefit from participating in supervised recreation programs 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Salary for staff to coordinate and operate recreation programs for youth and adults at the Martin Luther King Community Center. Clients are primarily from low-moderate income neighborhoods. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal Support Priority Public Services Strategy V.2 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ❑A ®B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: B2 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: January I—December 31,2013 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Staff salary&benefits 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑YES ONO 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(x): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570,201(c): Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570203: 2013 MLK CDBG App.docx Page 1 ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describel: 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) I)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)® Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone = ❑ Census Tract## 201 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC--Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes MNo Year program began? If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? Anticipate CDBG funding in 2014 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ®Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 30,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? 2013 MLK CDBG App.doex Page 2 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: 2013 MLK.CDHG App.docx Page 3 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if an Jan I—Dec 31,2013 Providing after school and non school day activities with the goal of building strong kids, strong families and a strong community through individual and team games,activities and special events. Supervisors stress four core values which are caring,honesty,respect and responsibility. 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense Iine items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $ OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 49,000 37,500 11,500 City Gen Funds Benefits 17,500 17,500 City Gen funds OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities 36,500 36,500 City Gen Fund Supplies 4,500 4,500 City Gen Fund CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials LaborlConlracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) M&O,Acct,Insurance 30,500 30,500 City Gen Fund TOTAL $138,000 $37,500 $100,500 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? 2013 MLK CDBG App.doex Page 4 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: Z Person,or by aHousehold(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 400 Number of clients below 50%median 2000 Number of clients below 80%median 1050 Number of elderly clients 200 Number of minority clients 3000 Total Number of Pasco residents served 3500 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Program Registration 2012 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland i Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50"/0 $23400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Mailing Address City/State Phone/Fax Email SUBMITTED BY Signature of Authorized fficial Title Date 2013 MLK CDBG App.doex Page 5 �' a 6 ! RECEIVED 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO MAY 2012 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND COMFflU ITY& ECONOPIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: City of Pasco—Administrative&Community Services PROJECT TITLE: Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist ADDRESS: 525 N Third Ave PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 1315 North 7h Ave(21.201,202,203,204) AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Rick Terway,Director A&CS E-MAIL: terwayr@pasco-wa.gov PHONE: 509-543-5757 FAX: 509-543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 37,500 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 200,500 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Provide the supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly with support services,nutrition,health and living skills support. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Salary for staff to oversee and operate programs serving senior citizens. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal Support Priority Public Services Strategy V.2 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ❑A M B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: B2 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: January 1—December 31,2013 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Staff salary&benefits 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑YES d NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(x): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ® Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): 2013 Sr Ctr CDBG App.docx Page 1 ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) I)[] You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3) N Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): ® Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes N No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? Anticipate CDBG funding in 2014 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: N Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ 30,000 40,000 $ 20,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ 2013 Sr Ctr CDBG App.docx Page 2 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: 2013 Sr Ctr CDB(;App.doex Page 3 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an Jan 1 —Dec 31,2013 Facility for persons 50 and older who can congregate for social,meeting, fitness,health care, foot care,meals,educational presentations,arts and crafts,plus a number of other leisure activities 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS Salaries 98,000 37,500 60,500 City Gen Funds Benefits 34,000 34,000 City Gen Funds OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities 35,000 35,000 City Gen Fund Supplies 12,000 12,000 City Gen Fund CONSTRUC N: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) M&O,Acct,Insurance 59,000 59;000 City Gen Fund TOTAL $ 238,000 $ 37,500 $ 200,500 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? 2013 Sr Ctr CDBG App.docx Page 4 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: N Person,or by oHousehold(family)? Number of clients below 30%median Number of clients below 50%median 8000 Number of clients below 80%median 19,000 Number of elderly clients 28,000 Number of minority clients 7,500 Total Number of Pasco residents served 32,000 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Program registration _ 2012 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Mailing Address City/State Phone/Fax Email SUBMITTED BY: 21 � U r44411a?�' �' dd 5--.,24--1 z Signature of Authorized fficial Title Date 2013 Sr Ctr CDBG App.docx Page 5 RECEIVED Lur a JUN 0 5 2012 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COtilf4UNITY& EC01J0f1IC 0EVELOPl,1Epd7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND AGENCY: +0_i �A MA OP ki`;_J1 PROJECT TITLE: iml OMNI P1 f IZ ADDRESS: rl a q 'So PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL �—{7 E-MAIL: Y ` PHONE: m ?ti_`�O q 4 _ (`� QC4�`(� FAX. AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: S AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ C^?�� �d ZA 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM qR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) . /?,i ,f 1/1 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority:0A JNB NC D and explain h w your proposal satisfies that priority: 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?,KYES ❑NO 8. ELE31BILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: 2013 CDBG Application Page 1 Charity Training Center CDGB Grant Application 2 0.3 Describe the problem or need: Our community needs are:The need to establish a workable home-based anti-gang prevention/intervention program that will begin to educate our youth and our surrounding communities working in conjunction with our local law enforcement, public schools and our judicial systems and community business that are in place and in need of assistance. Providing alternative education for those youths that have moderate to extreme difficulties or experience anti-social,gang related behavioral/loyalty patterns leading to non-success or failed in a public school setting that will lead to higher levels of poverty, incarcerated unproductive citizens. Working with the school districts we will be able to obtain referrals of those students that get expelled for any length of time so that Charity can intervene and provide intervention immediately so that these youth will not be subject to going home to a bad situation or falling prey to gang recruitment Explanation of proposal: Charity Training Center will establish relevant anti-gang prevention programs to meet the needs of low- income gang/anti-gang members and their families in our community. Charity Training Center will establish the following classes: 1. Academic classes for at risk youth and their families 2. Vocational classes for at risk youth and their families 3. Family Reunification program for at risk youth and their families 4. Spiritual guidance and Motivational classes for at risk youth and their families 5. Performing Art classes for at risk youth and their families 6. Creative Art classes for at risk youth and their families 7. Parenting and Anger management classes 8. ESL/ABE classes for at risk youth and their families 9. Angel Task-Force will be established to patrol our community and start pro-active neighborhood anti-gang Alert watches.These Angels will also be responsible to monitoring schools in the morning and after school where gang/anti-gang member's siblings may attend and curtail bullying problems and after school fighting.These Angels will also monitor quinceras (sweet 15/16 parities) and occasional wedding by invitation of parents, law enforcement or other related gang or anti-gang members to maintain peace. 10. Charity will create recreational programs for our low-income families and their at risk children. We will establish a network system with Parks and Recreation and other local business/agencies that provide recreation and jointly work together to provide this service to our families. Charity 'rra fining Center CDGB Grant Application 2. CONSOLIDATED PLAN Meeting several requirements under Gang-Related Legislation for the State of Washington. We have developed our programs reflecting some of these specific criteria in doing so we have been able to meet CDBG expectations and guidelines. Meeting the needs of low-income families and their at risk youth within our demographic area {TANF}recipients, utilizing low-income or section eight housing programs. Crime Analysis from the Pasco Police Dept. along with other agencies working already with the low-income families such as but not limited to:Community Action Committee,Salvation Army,St.Vincents', O1C, Goodwill Industries, Union Gospel Mission and numerous local churches.The Census report for 2000 is still in effect until a new census for 2010 is released and those results can be reflected. In an updated report. Charity with the appropriate funding will be able to provide our long range of programs services job training/vocational school,academic school for not only at risk youth, low-income families that are at risk to continue in poverty,who perhaps have a shady past or are first,second and even third generational gang/anti gang members themselves and were not successful in other trainings or job setting. Charity Training Center under the Washington Legislative definitions: 43.310.010{21 Non-Profit register in the state-Charity is such an organization (3)Gang risk prevention and intervention pilot programs"means a community-based positive prevention program and intervention program for gang members, at risk youth and elementary- through high school—aged youth. {These are in bedded and integrated into Charity Training Centers' main objectives) Al reducing the probability of youth involvement in gang activities and consequent violence B)Establishing ties, at an early age, between youth and community organization(Charity Training Center) C)Committing local business and community resources to a positive programming for youth (Charity Training is that positive program and working and building a strong support system for families, community and business all networking together) D)Committing state resources to assist [Charity Training Center.] In creation and development of the at risk gang prevention and intervention programs and there by Charity will be the pilot program for our state and the community of Pasco. Charity's' long range goal is to meet this requirement D] Cultivate awareness retreats and be a program that temporary relocates at risk youth, gang members and their families from their usual social environment to a different social environment,with the purpose of having those performing activities which will enhance or increase their positive behavior and potential life successes. {This can be achieving through our ha s zty Training Center CDGB kG ant Application network with local churches and retreats programs our network is with The Lords Land Retreat Center in Spokane. 4.Allocation Policy Al High Priority 1. Given the adequate funding we would be able to provide a permanent building for our community based program and provide public services to our community. A. we will be hiring disable persons that suffer from both physical and emotional set-backs that would not normally fit into a regular job setting,job training,and vocational training and be able to provide the educational components necessary. Our Spiritual guidance, Motivational components with our Creative arts and Performing arts programs. Reducing the barriers of the physically and emotionally impaired to be educated,employed and participate in these programs and be productive members of our growing community. C. The preservation of not only our at risk neighborhoods and their families through our Angel task force program,this will greatly benefit our community it will instill a unified pro-active involvement of an entire community from all aspects social,economical,environmental and will revitalize an entire community neighborhood . 2. Economic development of this project{Charity Training Center}will provide multifaceted job creation. B. Average Priority 2.Social Service project{Charity}will address a variety of community needs and provide services needed to assist disadvantaged youth. C. Low Priority 2. Social Services projects which provide assistance to the prevention of the homeless. This may be the domino effect that will provide employment or education to the homeless and there by provide a source of income and education. &. Specify exactly what CDBG funds will be used for? These funds would provide building expenses, lease or purchase of said building and utility costs.These funds would provide academic and vocational paid tuitions for at risk youth and low-income families.The funds to staff Charity Training Center and the equipment and supplies Charity Training Center CDGB Grant Application 2 Og for the different programs that would benefit gang/anti-gang members and their low-income families. They would also provide training monies for staff and participants. Cont. of pg.1 S. ELIBIBILITY OTHER: Charity Training Center gang/anti-gang prevention programs would be the first to accept the challenges and tremendous responsibilities of a fast growing endemic that is over- taking our communities. Reinforcing the right of all to live and raise our children in a safe and secure environment without the dangers of life and well-being. Providing jobs,training motivation and spiritual growth for our communities,change of at risk neighborhoods and at risk youth. Saving (Families and preserving life. Clarity Training Center 2 01 CDGB Grant Application 201,E Charity will be working closely with counseling agencies:drug/alcohol,mental health and other social service agencies. Charity will establish a working relationship, network system with local colleges and universities. This will allow Charity to obtain work study students and interns that are studying Specialized fields social services, mental health and communication/media music,art and so much more can be integrated.A new frontier in educational, case studies,case management, analysis of gang and anti-gang on site behavior.These analyses are vital to our State governmental agencies, our Local governments and our growing communities. Charities' Entire staff volunteers and some parents will be trained and attend training that will be provided to us by Pasco Police Dept. Anti-gang unit. ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 Cl~R 574.205: K Other(describe): t-, a&a 4 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 10� You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(L.MH)(LMC) 2)� Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-into a area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑Census Tract#n- -AA( j2 ed4 X 1!1�c2()10, 3)N� Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): // `` ❑Elderly person's []Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults Illiterate persons Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS P,Battered spouses 'Migrant farm workers XAt Risk Youth 'Other: © lL 4)X Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? es ❑No Year program began? Q If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be fimded in 2014? ig v 11. PUB IC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance, a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-fimded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑Continuation of Services �ew Service ❑ Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ $ 0 $ Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? 2013 CDBG Application Page 2 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROTECT OR SERVICE AREA: 2013 CDBG Application Page 3 Driving Directions from 203 N 4th Ave Pasco,Washington to Pasco, Washington Pagel of 2 Sorry!When printing directly from the browser your directions or map may not print APQUEST correctly. For best results,try clicking the Printer-Friendly button. Starting Location Ending Locations 203 N 4th Ave Pasco, WA Pasco, WA 99301-5322 Total Travel Estimate: 2 minutes / 0.78 miles Fuel Cost Calculate AIAi'g3tETT. aao n asco z - - s` A _ 3 F _ y •— - - 02¢14 Map4rra rarDaws 4024J4 ri0.V7¢0 203 N 4th AVeEdit Pasco, WA 99301-5322 Start out going NORTH on N 4TH AVE toward W BONNEVILLE ST. 0.5 mi +1 2_ Turn LEFT onto W MARIE ST. 0.2 mi ro 3. Turn RIGHT onto N 7TH AVE. 0.0 rrli 4. Welcome to F�ASC , Pasco, WA Edit hti-n-/I .iv"- rnar,r iiest.com/matac?I r=Pasco&1 S—ANA&l a=203+N+4th+Ave&l z=99301-5v_.. 5/27/2010 Charity Training Center 2012- CDGB Grant Application 20 /3 Pg.2 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE To create jobs,training programs to low-income at risk families, providing gang/anti-gang prevention programs, arts, motivation, life-,skills and reunification programs.Academic and General Educational courses. 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES EXPLAIN NOW YOUR APPLICATION QUALIFIES Charity is a non- profit corporation that has been working with gang/anti gang members and low-income families for two years in the Tri-city area. We have years of combined experience working with families here in the Tri-cities,Yakima and California,Arizona,Texas and Mexico. The deep compassion and concern for our city and our families has aided in the development of Charity. Our desire is to give back to our community and help integrate Hispanic culture with education and arts. Ending low self-esteem, building character, morals and ethical fiber creating a renewed identity and coping skills they lost alone the way.The amounts each integrated steps of educational pathways are measured and slowly curbed into acceptance without a show of force. Finding and fitting in,search and seek,getting your feet wet. Enjoying what you do and taking pride in your accomplishments no matter how small they may seem. We have been successful in the past to develop programs from the ground up and successfully integrated cultures,traditions and faith into the lives of others providing the proper balance into their lives and surpassing borders and barriers. 11. To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? Chi,, Df(ZNaL' PC-C C'/V— We have asked for consideration ' ' r. Our commitment to this proposal is a high priority because of the families and youth we can salvage, adding to our city's' and state revenues and job creation and retention. 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish nkilestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: t t. Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include nu ''rical performance progress if any) r - 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rendsupplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies -CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $ $ $ $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? e- 2013 CDBG Application Pate 4 Charity 'Training Center 201A CDGB Grant Application 200 Pg.4 PROJECT TIMELINE Date or ranges: March 20t� upon receiving grant we will begin a three goal and achievement process: March to June of 2011, 1. We will start the hiring/screening process with the help of Work Source this process will be completed. 2. We will have all office furniture delivered and placed in appropriate places/offices.All computers will be installed; program down loads will be completed and ready for student use. 3. All classes will be fully complete and staffed,all curriculum and supplies have been approved, ready to receive students. The purchase/ lease of a facility that will house Charity Training Center allowing us to begin to staff and get office ready for our grand-opening and inviting our community business to do walk through of our new facility. We will give the new staff time to review existing files that our v Volunteers have gathered over the last previous months of outreach and recruitment to determine the high-low priorities of our at risk youths and their low-income families and other low-income families in general.This time frame will be utilized to seek/search and apply to other funding sources that are approaching. JULY TO AUGUST OF 20� During this time frame staff will begin the implementation our first phases of our program training and curriculum. Family eligibility, histories and medical information are in their individual files and confidentiality is intact all participants referrals from families, public schools and the private and public sectors have all been achieved.At risk youth rotating to different classes and different time tables to maintain a current smooth flow of education, participation and peace. The students will be encouraged to be pro-active in each class and will also elect an advisory student committee that will help meet the needs of individual students and parents will also be encouraged to develop their individual parent committees to maintain and address individual family issues and organize fundraisers and benefits. Once a month or when necessary these committees will meet together to communicate needs,wants, expectation s and develop the lines of communication with parent/youth and staff. SEPTEMBER TO NOVEMBER OF 2011 Charity Trainhig Center 2 CDGB Grant Application SEPTEMBER TO NOVEMBER OF 2011 All staff and referrals are in place student goals and achievements are in place and accurate monthly reports are being done,family home visits will be planned and carried through. Monthly staff meeting or as necessary will be conducted.Student/Family meetings will be conducted monthly or as appropriate to meet the needs of participants. December to February of 204 All participants would have finished start up goals and achievements this will be a period of group and staff reflection of priorities that have been met and those that haven't and explanations and recommendations to administrative staff as to solutions/cause and effect.All programs will be in full operation. January to March 2012 Time for classroom graduations completed course studies and intermediate completions. All participates will be part of the gradational ceremonies for graduates will be conducted in a different manner that reflects all participants' hard work and dedication. The outcomes will be celebrated by the entire family units enrolled in different aspects of our continual programs.This will allow entire families to graduate together and reflect on their year.These months will also be preparation time for readiness to continue applications for our funding year. March 20l will be a year of miracles, surprises and success. This will also be the time to analyze facts surveys,family and staff inputs. All State and Federal reports have been completed. Our interns have worked hard to produce their analysis of our program, at risk youth/ at risk-low-income families and staff. Proving these facts and analysis on the impact Charity has had on our community families and our demographic areas will be vital to proving success/what worked and setbacks/what did not work, This will be the workable tool of measurement and further recommendations for Charity and our fenders,community, law enforcement and our state and governments. 14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request how will the goals of your project be adjusted?What portion of your program is abandoned,will fewer persons be served, etc? ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR CHARITY TRAINING CENTER 2011 EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEMS $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG $ OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: SALARIES $631,946.00 BENEFITS $157,986.50 OPERATIONS RENT/LEASE $27,600.00 UTILITIES $ 170,000.00 SUPPLIES $ 12,000.00 CONSRTUCTION ARCHITECTUAL LABOR/CONTRACTS OTHER $ 117,050.00 TOTAL $ 1,365,582.50 Chanty Training Center 201A CDGB Grant Application 2OJ9 We wilt hopefully be able to sustain reduced man-power and have time to develop a system to seep out other job-slots that will be paid by other agencies to help hire our staff knowing that when that money runs out we face the facts that a position is gone.. Charitys' primary goal will not change and that is to help as many gang/anti-gang members and low-income families as money permits us to do. Defiantly there would be less families receiving service because the money just isn't there and having the money available to equip the classes effectively and there-by that would alone create reductions in all our services,we would work just as hard to accomplish the same outcome with the few save and change a life. 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES -List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ❑Person,or by❑Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median C Number of clients below 50%median /J Number of clients below 80%median /0 Number of elderly clients ho Number of minority clients Total Number of Pasco residents served 1 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? 4, 2012 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick Pasco--Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained r f Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons = f (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this j program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title �- Mailing Address City/State Email d"I SUBMITTED BY: Signature of Authorized Offici Title Date 2013 CD13G Application Page 5 13 W 0 o Multicultural uits��rdl Headquarters/ Subsidiary ,� r Teams Relationships " 50ve C)//\\ d Ur r #F 'I Local Business `.context: 2 Cultures within Cultures r NO to Pullin our community together through diver- � tY � g . . sivized multi-cultural programs. Intergrating business,community and troubled youth. A hope for our future the most intivative programs of this time. Atras Las Millas Dios nos A Bendicido en los tiempos Buenos en los mallos.Si usted decia un cambia neuevo, si usted esta cansado de gangas, drogas, vivir sin trabajo y educacion. Estamos aqui para la communidad, pa- dres,hijos,abuellos,encarcelad.os. Para su Cuidad, Intregrando communidad,negocios y programs multi- culturas, bilingules. CALL- LLAME : Louisa Alaniz-2o6-830-8478, Kim Lowe —509-302-0670, Felipe Robles 509-851-2876 E-mail: louisaalaniz.dreadchampions@gmail.com Phoenix Gang Programs - Fighting Gang Violence With Evidence-Based Antigang Strate... Page I of 3 Phoenix Gang intervention and Prevention Home I About Us I Site Index I Phone Consultation I Contact Us r.' f ! f l F 1 f 7 y. Do you need prevention or intervention - resources?Take a look at our decision tool explaining the difference_ Welcome to Phoenix Gang Intervention Programs,state-of-the-art treatment programs for gang intervention,built on respected concepts of cognitive-behavioral treatment(CBT)and motivational interviewing(MI).These resources provide the most comprehensive approach to gang intervention in corrections and community settings.For j illustration, MI elements are built into the actual curriculum elements making it easy for staff to guide participants through the necessary stages of change in their thinking and behavior. We provide evidence-based treatment and curriculum resources for use in correctional,probation,parole,detention, diversion,school,and community-based programs. These highly successful and innovative resources are used nationwide in correctional settings to address the risk factors underlying gang recruitment and gang involvement,and provide antigang strategies for both gang intervention programs and gang prevention programs(see the terms crane intervention and gap, prevention ex lamed. These program resources are based on state-of-the-art evidence-based models.They include significant elements of F cognitive-behavioral therapy(CBT)and motivational enhancement therapy(MET),including specific tools for motivational interviewing(MI)in each of the workbooks.Cognitive-behavioral therapy(CBT)promotes re-evaluation of dysfunctional emotions and behaviors to bring about change. Motivational enhancement therapy(MET)seeks to promote change by making the client aware of problems and consequences of behavior.The motivational interviewing(MI)tools we provide are non-confrontational and gently provoke awareness.We can work with you to customize a gang intervention curriculum using cognitive-behavioral therapy(CBT)and motivational enhancement therapy(MET)techniques specifically to the needs of your facility or community program. One of our strongest features is that we tailor our resources to your specific needs,objectives,and time constraints.With over 200 resources available,we can provide specific suggestions to assist you.If you have a quesfion,please cun'.act us. It you need help selecting the right materials, please visit our more detailed consultation form. Programming Areas httr://www.LyanRt)roarains.coin/ 7,11 `')()In Research-hased Risk Factors SA=Substance Abuse SDO=School Drop-out D= Delinquency V=Violence i P—Teen Pregnancy D&A= Depression and Anxiety Avallabliltyo€Mugs x x Availability of Firearms x x conlllltlnity Lavis aiicI NornisF-,ivorable Tot'lar{I Mug Use,Firearms,and i x x x Crime Media Portrayals of Violence x i Tr6ositiormildMobility x x x x x E Lot;�t+ielgl�l>oritoorlAitacl7mentandContntunityUisorganizatian x x x Extren>eEconomicDeprivation x x x x x Family History of tile Problem Behavior x x x x x x FamilyManaaementProblems x x x x x x Family Coll flict x x x x x x � FavoralA Pare ntaI Attitude s and Involvement Int lie Problem Behavior x x x 1 IAcademic Fa€lure9egimiingin Late ElementarySchool x x x x x x LackofCommitmenttoSchool x x x x x Early and Pe rsiste tit Antisocial Behavior x x x x x Rebelliousness x x x x Friends Who Engage In the Problem Behavior x x x x x Favorable Attitudes-rot'rard the Problem Behavior x x x x x Early Initiation of the problem Behavior x x x x x constitutlonalFactors x x x x C , z t •� r ��Sr'�ngtan s�� Healthy Youth Survey Fact Sheet �e,SyYQ1140So� Peer-Individual Risk Factors for Ellen 4choa Middle School (Pasco School District) Year: 2010 Grade: 8 Gender: Bath Number of Students Surveyed: 247 Background: • Research shows that the risk factors measured by the Healthy Youth Survey are linked to adolescent substance use,delinquency,violence,school dropout,and other risky health behaviors. • The attitudes kids have about drug use strongly influence the likelihood they will use drugs. Families and communities should model health attitudes and choices. Peer-individual Risk Factors Peer-Individual Risk Factor Trends Grade 8,2010 Gradexxx 8 90% -+i--Perceived Risk or Drug Use(RF) Attitudes Favor Drug Use(RF) ♦—Friends Use Drugs(RF) intentions to Use Drugs(RF) 70% 54% 70% 60% 46% 60% 40°10 50°k 32% rn 40%- -9 40% a 30% ris 0 30% 0 20% 201 10% 10% 0% 0"/ RF:%At Risk RF:%At Risk RF*/.k Risk RF:%At Risk Pe ive�disk Att ude avor Fri ds Use I tend° ns to o� rug Use rug se rugs rise 4rugs 2004 2006 2008 2010 Prevalence 2004 2006. 2008 2010 Perceived Risk of 51% ±11 52% t11 50% t11 54% 40 In 2010,32%of 8th graders in our s were at risk for favorable Drug Use (RF) attitudes towards drugs. Attitudes Favor t10 34 f11 34 40°!o °!o Drug Use (RF) °!o f11 32°!o f$ Friends Use Drugs 47% ±12 50% t11 34% t11* 400!6 f9 (RF) Perceived Risk of Drug Use(RF) Intentions to Use 44% ±12 39% t11 38% j11 46% +9 Compared to the State,All Grades,2010 Drugs (RF) 80 Local State 70% 60% From 2008 to 2010, there has been no change In the perceived risk C 50% of drug use among 8th graders in ours. 40% t� 30% 20% For More Information: 10% Parents,schools,Kids,and communities can work together to keep youth safe.To see how State and local partners are addressing these 0% issues,see listings on the v vw.AskHYS.net homepage. 6th 8th loth 12th • For free guides on preventing alcohol and other drug use,call Washington State Alcohol/Drug Information Clearinghouse: Prevalence 6th 81th loth 12th 1-800-662-9111. Local 62% t7* 54°!0 ;+' ( r- - For non-State resources,parents can go to Nww.drugfree.ory. t10* - Prevention professionals should see rttp:flcaptus.sarnl isa.00vi^utrtrstern. State 40% +2 38 11/0 ±3 39°!o f3 48% f2 Prevalence is displayed with 95%confidence intervals(as f or black bar 1) indicates a significant change,pa0.05 Washington HYS results generated at ",, on 07-21-2011 Missing codest S=result suppressed due to insufficient reporting from students of schools;NIP=location did not participate in the survey this year, NIG=grade not available; NIS=question was not surveyed this year.NIA=question was not asked of this grade;NBIG=this gender was not at this location Table 16: Total Pregnancies by Woman's Age and County of Residence - Washington Sta... Page 1 of 1 Table 16. Total Pregnanciesl by Woman's Age and County of Residence, 2010 Ali t, Cotmty Ages t 15 15-19 15-17 18-19 20-24 25-2:+ 30-3.4 35-39 40-44 45+ U0 State Total 108,045 129 9,348 2,913 6,435 25,526 30,813 25,597 13,057 3,264 265 46 Adams 495 3 82 27 55 132 140 89 44 3 2 0 Asotin 299 1 38 18 20 102 84 51 16 7 0 0 Benton 2,956 2 331 109 222 841 834 588 290 68 2 0 Chelan 1,133 0 133 50 83 278 321 278 99 21 2 1 Clallam 806 1 91 29 62 215 233 184 66 16 0 0 Clark 6,679 6 564 166 398 1,597 1,957 1,597 748 185 20 5 Columbia 43 0 3 0 3 12 13 9 4 1 0 1 Cowlitz 1,389 1 166 45 121 451 394 265 85 22 2 3 Douglas 588 0 72 26 46 162 171 100 70 13 0 0 Ferry 79 0 8 4 4 25 28 16 1 1 0 0 ' Franklin s ro 1,896 6 244 85 159 497 569 380 170 25 5 0 Garfield 21 0 1 0 1 4 5 8 1 2 0 0 Grant 1,816 4 239 85 154 581 495 325 139 31 2 0 Grays Harbor 1,020 1 123 35 88 320 312 177 75 11 1 0 Island 1,102 0 64 21 43 338 340 231 97 28 2 2 Jefferson 266 0 23 5 18 74 74 48 34 12 0 1 King 32,208 36 1,912 611 1,301 5;493 8,231 9,321 5,645 1,432 125 13 Kitsap 3,588 4 310 69 241 1,057 1,099 714 302 95 5 2 Kittitas 540 0 51 12 39 165 157 115 43 8 1 0 Klickitat 247 0 23 3 20 61 69 51 36 7 0 0 Lewis 1,127 7 144 41 103 362 337 187 74 15 1 0 Lincoln 101 0 11 4 7 30 26 16 13 5 0 0 Mason 792 1 96 32 64 234 234 139 73 12 2 1 Okanogan 636 2 97 31 66 186 164 107 69 11 0 0 Pacific 238 0 27 6 21 87 70 33 19 2 0 0 Pend Oreille 139 0 18 7 11 44 37 25 8 7 0 0 Pierce 14,014 12 1,331 403 928 3,850 4,355 2,835 1,276 318 27 10 San Juan 110 0 10 3 7 20 32 32 14 2 0 0 Skagit 1,782 6 208 78 130 433 518 390 180 41 5 1 Skamania 98 0 12 4 8 21 30 22 11 2 0 0 Snohomish 11,221 6 807 250 557 2,294 3,420 2,862 1,410 392 27 3 Spokane 6,945 6 641 187 454 1,908 2,086 1,505 636 152 11 0 Stevens 482 0 70 21 49 137 124 97 42 12 0 0 Thurston 3,801 3 303 83 220 953 1190 875 384 85 7 1 Wahkiakum 37 0 4 3 1 9 9 8 4 3 0 0 Walla Walla 772 0 80 20 60 186 231 174 77 23 1 0 Whatcom 2,866 6 236 70 166 664 837 693 331 91 7 1 Whitman 542 0 28 5 23 142 181 129 51 11 0 0 Yakima 5,166 15 747 265 482 1,561 1,405 917 420 92 8 1 Unknown 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 t Total Pregnancies equals the sum of live births, abortions,and fetal deaths. Source: Center for Health Statistics,Washington State Department of Health, 0112012. Last Update: 10/8/2010 03:08 PM httn°//x,,.Rx,tx- cinh Table 19: Age Specific Live Birth Rates by County of Residence - Washington State Dept... Page 1 of 2 Table 19.Age Specific Live Birth Rates' by County of Residence, 2010 All County Ages 15-19 15-17 18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 3539 40.44 State Total 63.8 26.7 13.0 46.6 83.4 108.6 100.5 49.9 11.0 Adams 128.0 106.5 54.6 199,2 206.0 214.3 132,0 77.2 Asotin 64.6 39.6 29.7 54.0 134.9 109.8 73.8 21.4 Benton 74.5 37.5 17.5 72.3 130,0 126.3 96.8 48.6 9,6 Chelan 78.4 43.8 26.3 73.9 119.2 144.7 125.0 41.4 7.5 Clallam 67.1 31.1 17.0 53,1 116.1 1231 1024 31.3 7.9 Clark 64.8 25.0 9.9 52.1 102.2 124.1 96.8 42.0 9.6 Columbia 69.0 * * * 109.8 147.7 121.6 Cowlitz 64.4 37.7 14.8 74.7 131.0 120.4 81.9 25.0 5.6 Douglas 73.4 403 21.2 80.5 138.9 132.9 79.6 53.3 9.4 Ferry 58.5 22.6 * 113,0 147.2 93.3 * " Franklin 101.1 62.8 34.1 109.1 158.3 171.6 117.0 58.7 9_- 3 Garfield 66.9 * * * * 106.4 153.8 Grant 96.2 59,8 33.0 101.0 188.6 160.1 106.5 46.5 11.3 Grays Harbor 70,3 41.8 16.7 80.9 1401 130.5 81.9 30.7 3.9 Island 70.8 15.7 4.8 36.9 119.7 130.5 103.7 41 A 10.6 Jefferson 55.8 21.3 * 52,6 107.0 111.8 65.9 48.0 9.8 King 58.3 16.4 8.2 28.0 50.8 791 108.1 65.4 15.4 Kitsap 641 23.8 7.2 50.8 108.3 123.0 92.8 35.7 9.1 Kittitas 45.2 12.8 12.0 13.1 36.6 113.1 102.6 35.2 5.8 Klickitat 72.0 32.1 * 82.1 128.1 154.7 91.9 57.0 10.5 Lewis 71.9 40.1 14.3 81.1 149.8 138.0 76.6 28.8 5.5 Lincoln 65.1 28.0 55.0 1591 122.6 69.9 53.1 Mason 66.5 34,3 15.1 65.3 135.2 120.9 83.2 38,0 3.6 Okanogan 86.1 623 27.1 128.6 170.5 146.0 95.1 53.9 8.8 Pacific 72.4 31.7 76.5 181.4 144.2 68,7 35.0 Pend Oreille 64.9 39.3 * 108.9 155.1 123.1 81.5 22.1 13.9 Pierce 64.4 29.0 133 53.1 98.3 118.9 89.0 38.8 7,8 San Juan 48.1 21.6 * 50.5 65.0 97.2 90.9 34.2 Skagit 70.8 38,4 23.1 64.9 104.0 127.9 102.3 46.6 9.7 Skamania 47.8 216 * 44.6 88.0 104.2 68.0 30.7 Snohomish 62.2 19.5 9.1 37.6 75.7 119.0 104.2 48,3 113 Spokane 60.7 26.1 13.2 412 78,2 112.6 95.1 39.0 7.8 Stevens 64.3 39.2 15.1 95.8 147.7 132.9 83.7 34.9 8.1 Thurston 58.5 21.6 8.4 41.7 80.3 112.1 89.6 37.4 6.7 Wahkiakum 69,9 * 140.0 140.6 101.3 Walla Walla 59.0 24.3 11.5 35.7 66.6 118.9 101.5 44.4 12.2 Whatcom 54.2 17.4 8.7 24.9 45.1 108.9 105.2 48,5 11.5 Whitman 32.3 3.8 * 3.5 14.0 92.9 107.8 537 10.7 Yakima 91.2 62.7 111.8 159,8 _ 149.5 107,5 48.2 11.6 1 The general fertility rate shown under"All Ages"equals total live births per 1,000 women of childbearing age(15-44).Age-Specific rate equal the number of live births to women in a specific age group per 1,000 women in the age group. *Rate not calculated because number of events was less than 5. Population Data: See Appendix A:Technical Appendix,Sources of Data: Population. Table 18: Live Births by Woman's Age and County of Residence - Washington State Dep... Page 1 of 1 Table 18. Live Births by Woman's Age and County of Residence, 2010 I AI Coc,�r.Y Aeiey <15 15-19 15-17 10.19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45+ LInk State Total 86,480 55 5,993 1,724 4,269 18,622 25,562 22,466 11,068 2,506 194 14 Adams 468 0 79 26 53 123 135 83 43 3 2 0 Asotin 242 0 27 12 15 82 74 43 12 4 0 0 Benton 2,530 2 235 70 165 705 742 532 258 54 2 0 Chelan 1,011 0 111 42 69 241 301 255 86 16 1 0 Clallam 679 1 57 19 38 185 206 165 51 14 0 0 Clark 5,480 4 364 93 271 1,247 1,669 1,406 629 143 16 2 Columbia 39 0 3 0 3 9 13 9 4 1 0 0 Cowlitz 1,193 0 132 32 100 375 345 244 77 18 2 0 Douglas 524 0 56 20 36 146 153 95 63 11 0 0 Ferry 64 0 5 4 1 20 24 14 1 0 0 0 Franklin 776-91-- ,6 6 188 63 125 421 526 342 155 20 3 0 Garfield 21 0 1 0 1 4 5 8 1 2 0 0 Grant 1,637 4 203 68 135 521 453 301 126 28 1 0 Grays Harbor 846 1 95 23 72 273 254 156 59 8 0 0 !stand 929 0 35 7 28 270 301 212 84 24 2 1 Jefferson 199 0 14 2 12 52 57 39 29 7 0 1 King 24,514 10 943 276 667 3,261 6,244 8,054 4,790 1,107 100 5 Kitsap 2,931 1 196 37 159 822 939 643 252 75 2 1 Kittitas 424 0 25 7 18 116 139 103 35 6 0 0 Klickitat 226 0 20 3 17 51 67 49 33 6 0 0 Lewis 926 2 96 21 75 305 290 160 60 12 1 0 Lincoln 95 0 9 3 6 28 26 16 13 3 0 0 Mason 622 0 59 16 43 182 192 122 60 6 1 0 Okanogan 570 1 81 23 58 164 154 99 61 10 0 0 Pacific 201 0 16 2 14 76 63 29 16 1 0 0 Pend Oreille 119 0 15 4 11 38 32 22 7 5 0 0 Pierce 10,686 5 795 220 575 2,711 3,502 2,413 1,025 218 14 3 San Juan 99 0 8 3 5 16 31 30 12 2 0 0 Skagit 1,471 2 149 57 92 332 454 341 159 33 1 0 Skamania 88 0 8 3 5 19 27 21 11 2 0 0 Snohomish 9,001 1 467 137 330 1,601 2,895 2,515 1,205 299 18 0 Spokane 5,788 1 452 123 329 1,489 1,827 1,355 541 115 8 0 Stevens 431 0 59 16 43 117 116 89 39 11 0 0 Thurston 2,955 1 180 42 138 660 987 753 310 56 7 1 Wahkiakum 33 0 3 2 1 7 9 8 4 2 0 0 Walla Walla 660 0 59 13 46 158 194 160 68 20 1 0 Whatcom 2,321 3 140 32 108 454 736 628 282 71 7 0 Whitman 422 0 12 3 9 73 160 119 48 10 0 0 Yakima 4,374 10 596 200 396 1,268 1.220 833 359 83 5 0 Source: Center for Health Statistics,Washington State Department of Health,0112012. Last Update: 10/8/2010 03:08 PM hltn //tz :rxx Anh xxFa 0 t-___ - -•• -- Table 17: Age-Specific Pregnancy Rates by County of Residence - Washington State Dep... Page 1 of 2 Table 17. Age-Specific Pregnancy Rates' by County of Residence, 2070 All County Ages 15-19 15-17 18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 State Tota12 79.7 41.6 21.9 70.2 114.3 130.9 114.5 58.9 14.4 Adams 135.4 110,5 56.7 206.8 221.1 222.2 141.5 79.0 Asotin 79.8 55.7 44.6 71.9 167.8 124.6 87.5 28.6 11.0 Benton 87.0 52.8 27.3 97.2 155.1 142.0 107.0 54.6 12.1 Chelan 87.9 52.5 31.3 88.9 137.6 1543 136.3 47.6 9.8 Claliam 79.6 49.6 25.9 86.6 134.9 139.2 114.1 40.5 9.0 Clark 78.9 38.7 17.7 76.5 130.8 145.5 109.9 50.0 12.4 Columbia 76.1 * 146.3 147.7 121.6 Cowlitz 75.0 47,4 20.8 90.4 157.5 137.5 88.9 27.6 6.8 Douglas 82.4 51.8 27.5 102.9 154.1 148.6 83.8 59.2 11.1 Ferry 72.2 36.2 141.2 171.8 106,7 Franklin 115.4 814 45.9 138.7 186.9 185.6 130.0 64.4 11.7 Garfield -- 66.9 106.4 153.8 Grant 106.7 70.4 41.3 1153 210.3 174.9 115.0 51.3 12.5 Grays Harbor 84.8 54.2 25.3 98.9 164.3 160.2 92.9 39.1 5.4 Island 84.0 28.7 14.3 56.7 149.8 147.4 113.0 47.9 12.4 Jefferson 74.6 35.0 11,6 78.9 152.3 145.1 81.1 56.3 168 King 76.6 33.3 18.2 54.7 85.6 1043 125.1 77.1 19.9 Kitsap 78.5 37.6 115 77.1 139.3 143.9 103.1 42.7 11.5 Kittitas 57.6 26.2 20.7 28.5 52.1 127.7 114.5 43.3 7,8 Klickitat 78.7 36.9 96.6 1533 159.4 95.7 62.2 12.2 Lewis 87.5 60.1 27.9 111.4 177.8 160.3 89.5 35.6 6.9 Lincoln 69.2 34.3 642 170.5 122.6 69.9 53.1 18.1 Mason 84.7 55.8 30.1 97.1 173.8 147.4 94.8 46.3 7.2 Okanogan 96,0 74.6 36.5 146.3 1933 155.5 102.8 61.0 9.7 Pacific 85.8 53.6 18.7 114.8 207.6 160.2 78.2 41.6 ' Pend Oreille 75.7 47.1 24.9 108.9 179.6 142.3 92.6 25.2 19.4 Pierce 84.5 48.6 24.3 85.7 139.7 147.9 104.6 48.3 11.4 San Juan 53.4 27.0 70.7 81.3 100.3 97.0 39.9 Skagit 85.7 53.6 31.7 91.7 135.6 146.0 117.0 52.7 12.0 Skamania 533 35.4 * 71.4 97.2 115.8 71.2 30.7 Snohomish 77.5 33.8 16.5 63.4 108.4 140.6 118.6 56.6 14.9 Spokane 72.8 37.0 20.0 56.9 100.2 128.6 105.7 45.8 10.4 Stevens 71.9 46.5 19.9 109.1 173.0 142.0 91.3 37.6 8.9 Thurston 75.3 36.4 16.5 66.5 115.9 135.2 104.1 46.3 10.1 Wahkiakum 78.4 * 180.0 140.6 101.3 Walla Walla 69.1 33.0 17.7 46.5 78.4 . 141 6 110.4 50.2 14.0 Whateom 66.9 29.4 19.0 38.3 66.0 123.9 116.1 56.9 14.7 Whitman 41.5 8.9 8.9 8.8 27.1 105,1 116.8 57.0 11.7 Yakima 107.8 76.5 44.4 136.1 196.7 172.2 118.4 56.4 12.9 1 The general pregnancy rate shown under°All Ages"equals total pregnancies(live births.fetal deaths,plus abortions) per 1,000 women of childbearing age(15-44). Age-Specific rate equal the number of pregnancies to women in a specific age group per 1,000 women in the age group. 2 Total pregnancies includes 5 abortions for which county of residence was unknown. RECEIVED JUN 0 5 2012 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO GOf,iC,1MITY & EGONOPIC DEVELOP('IENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND AGENCY: ~ PROJECT TITLE: .. ADDRESS: PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL (} t i E-MAIL: PHONE: fS --d FAX: AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: S AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:S 6 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(#S RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: -mac ?L 2) 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how our proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation.Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section H in Allocation Policy): Priority:�gA ❑B XC ❑lD and explain how your proposal satisfies that priont T� _.� � (22 e—,IA4n, 0 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: _ C' h. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: etc 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION'? JJ`Y ES ❑ 1\10 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 belmO (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Publi .cquisitiou of Pr�_ert y 24 CFR 570,201(a): ❑ Public Facilities ietiW.con4truction or capital ii7it_ioveitierits)24 CFR 5 7C'.01 c . EaWic Services=4 CFR 570.201(e): F,c�nomic 4 ""PR 570.20Uo):.7 1 CF..R_�,'70. ,3- ❑ il;nisiri rehGbslitq jq ;r i,- es- ryation 24 CF"._5 C Charity Training Center 0 1�7'_ CDBG Grant Application 20 13 1. Describe the problem or need: our community needs are:The need to establish a workable home-based anti-gang prevention/intervention program that will begin to educate our youth,their families and our surrounding communities working in conjunction with our local law enforcement, public schools and our judicial systems and community business.All citizens working together united for t he preservation of life and the safety for our communities. Providing alternative education and employment for those youths that have low to moderate difficulties or experience anti-social, gang related behavioral/loyalty patterns leading to non-success or failure in a public school setting and deters them from entering successfully into the job market. Which in turn leads to higher levels of poverty, incarcerated unproductive citizens. Working with the juvenile justice system we can acquire contracts for youths that are headed the wrong way.Those youths that must complete community service hours or deferred cases that fit our criteria. This will aide them to discover through hard work, dedication and taking pride in their own self-worth and individual successes.The need to establish work ethics, partnerships, and teamwork to be able to provide for their families needs instead of the alternatives that further push the youths and young adults into gang family lifestyles that provide for those needs by any means possible and illegally obtained. The inability to provide for the needs of siblings to have a decent pair of shoes a winter coat VS paying for the heating bills during cold winter days and putting food on the table .These are just some of the known factors of why and how poverty and the increasing drop in the job market effects them,younger siblings and tears apart the family unit. Increasing the states burdens on an already overloaded/over worked penal system. Learned behavior;you see you do. Charity can intervene and provide intervention immediately so that these youths will not be subject to going home to a bad situation; poverty with no hope insight, falling prey to gang recruitment;due to these very serious factors that are increasing yearly, population growth and the flow of immigrants trying to relocate. Contributing to the increase of gang activity and the rapid acceleration of criminal behavior. We are at the cross road now is the perfect time to act. "We are better together." Charity Training Center �� � CDBG Grant Application 20 .t3 Z. Explanation of proposal: Charity Training Center has established a relevant diversifier, multi-cultural approach to anti-gang prevention/ intervention programming to meet the needs of low-income families with or without gang- related issues. Charity Training Center in order to continue these much needed programs, realizes we can't do it alone we need your help. Start up funds for organic farmers Youth Co-op. + Charity's youth organic farmers co-op produce and marketing + USDA certified organic producers,youth farmers and growers + Land provided by the families themselves(donated land) + Planting to harvest 4 Product sells on the open market( farmers market,flea market Pasco) + Marketing produce to independent food stores (Hispanic markets, restaurants) Marketing to entire food chains (Wal-Mart, Safeway, Albertson) 3 With the aide and experience of Kitchen Specialties (Victoria)market, label, produce (future goal) •3 Charity's organic salsa's local and statewide production (future goal) + Self-sustaining, independent from all state, federal and local funding 3 Completion of our goals to implement all of Charity's anti-gang prevention/ intervention programs as describe in the 201IJ-2tTL CDBG. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN ve-14, (3� Charity Training Center 2 0 1,2, CDBG Grant Application 4. ALLOCATION POLICY A) High Priority Charity creating jobs for low/moderate income families in Franklin County. Low-income families can benefit greatly with less pressure on the family unit and now they will be able to buy school clothes for a sibling or help his/her parents pay a bill and put food on the table C ) Charity would be able to provide employment to 10 low-incorn,e youths creating jobs self i employment they will also learn :delegation, responsibility, marketing,sells, manufacturing.. 5. PROJECT COMPLETION Early spring the youths will be cultivating, preparation the land April--is our planting season May-watering,weeding, rafting leveling June—Harvesting.produce, marketing July-August-Harvesting, produce sells September-October-Last harvest October-November-Land Preparation for upcoming year 2013 December-February-Produce canning March-April -Land an Soil Preparations 6. CDBG funds how would you use them To buy gardening equipment, organic seed,organic soil, organic compost To pay the salaries of 10 very needy low-income youths To pay families water cost incurred by us to water Charity's produce To pay for night watchmen on alert to prevent damage or stolen produce. ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ?04J,11A �AO_4�_ It TIAI, + Other(describe): � } W yr-JV 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1)1)� You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2) Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income a a(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract#_.7_01 =0a , a 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): ❑Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers r� At Risk Youth 4)� our project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele I 1ViH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes JgNo Year program began? .Zoo Er If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES (� � To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services New Service A Increase in Service ,' . 1 �1/ % �j.!1� r Y'l - U 00 1.,A _ (y 1A,'f p i bj f s"kA 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DFPARTMI J RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ $ $ Richland $ $ $ Kemiewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To hat other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? 2013 CDBG Application Pa!e 2 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: 2013 e DBG,Applicitiol, Page Map ov. *1*41112- A(vina St Pasco, 'VVA 99301-64-40 s. F- F Ii.j SE E L E Lil" 1200m =01i MaP(Iuast - Patterns=t9 frosimap I)iMcUans;and maps ars-informational only.-Ale make no warranties sn the accuracy of their contenx,r-md conditions or route usabilit or expeditiousness.YOulassume all risk Of Ose.MapQttest and its suppliers,shall not Wiable to you for any toss or delay fesulting frown your use of ,tiAapQuest,Your use of MSPQuest means you agree to our.. 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milesto a/Go 1(include n mer' aI crformance progress if an n 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses, new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $"TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $ OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: }- Salaries )0) 0 WGf Benefits t) `, -7,3 ,3 T ✓ OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities f ' ©Cr / Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTH : (describe) TOTAL $6K-7 O 1 $'N - ✓ $ $ 4 I Additional explanati`on�of the above budget: /6 Q °� i�J i L If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals o your pr ject be adjusted? What po ion of your project Mll be abandorae will few p-persons be served, etc.? I h 2013 CDBG APPlication Page 4 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ❑Person,or by❑Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median Number of clients below 50%median m Z IKAaA Number of clients below 80%median Number of elderly clients 1 Nuraber of minority1 Bents , 3 4 +�L Q `f r i f'�'IP1!'h, PiYZS Total Number or sitien�s served I 1 TL/ ��_ (Should=total#above)-rg What is the data source for the information provided above? on ,4(A2'AtA3 income Limit Cea' clines for Kennewick—Pasco—Richland 1 Person All ea le 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 6,050 $18,050 J $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% ($7r,4_310 $42,800 048.150) $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 4dian 6,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $8$,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained 1 Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) -4. - - ­ - -—­ -1'111 - __ T, Y' 18. CONTACT INFORMATION n4e11LWW&1 -# Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Lo w i< 1h1t) f kim Loat.., V/1 r� 6a 41 441 Mailing Address CityZState L4 0 n Z 1J 1 Email / 6flh 1 SUBMITTED BY: CZ eigi�iaturc o Authorized Offic, Title Date 2013 CDBG Application pni!c 5 v a a Headquarters Multicultural Sti sidiary Teairis Relati nsl hips i IA Y' ?' x i Local Business Context, Cultures within Cultures t�Yt.L NO to UI gsl Pulling our community together through diver- sivized multi-cultural programs. Intergrating -;;_w business,community and troubled youth. A hope for our future the most intivative programs of - this time. Atras Las Millas Dios nos A Bendicido en los tiempos buenos en los mallos.Si usted decia un cambio neuevo, si usted esta cansado de gangas, drogas, vivir sin trabajo y educacion. Estarnos aqui para la communidad, pa- dres,hijos,abuellos,enearcelados. Para su Cuidad, Intregrando comrnunidad,negocios y programs multi- culturas, bilin.gules. CALL- LLAME : Louisa Alaniz-206-83o-8478, Kim Loge —509-302-o670, Felipe Robles 509-851-2876 E-mail: louisa.alaniz.dreadchampions@gmail.com Phoenix Gang Programs -Fighting Gang Violence With Evidence-Based Antigang Strate... Page 1 of 3 Phoenix Gang Intervention and Prevention Horne I About Us I Site index I Phone Consultation I Contact Us I a . _ CNr Do you need prevention or intervention ° resources?Take a look at our decision tool explaining the difference. Welcome to Phoenix Gang Intervention Programs,state-of-the-art treatment programs for gang intervention,built on respected concepts of cognitive-behavioral treatment(CBT)and motivational interviewing(MI).These resources provide the most comprehensive approach to gang intervention in corrections and community settings.For illustration, MI elements are built into the actual curriculum elements making it easy for staff to guide participants through the necessary stages of change in their thinking and behavior. raper We provide evidence-based treatment and curriculum resources for use in correctional,probation, parole,detention, diversion,school,and community-based programs. These highly successful and innovative resources are used nationwide in correctional settings to address the risk factors underlying gang recruitment and gang involvement,and provide antigang strategies for both gang intervention programs and gang prevention programs(see the terms pang intervention and gang prevention ex 1p tined). These program resources are based on state-of-the-art evidence-based models. They include significant elements of rt t r cognitive-behavioral therapy(CBT)and motivational enhancement therapy(MET),including specific tools for , motivational interviewing(full)in each of the workbooks.Cognitive-behavioral therapy(CBT)promotes re-evaluation of dysfunctional emotions and behaviors to bring about change. Motivational enhancement therapy(MET)seeks to promote change by making the client aware of problems and consequences of behavior.The motivational interviewing(MI)tools we provide are non-confrontational and gently provoke awareness.We can work with you to customize a gang intervention curriculum using cognitive-behavioral therapy(CST)and motivational enhancement therapy(MET)techniques specifically to the needs of your facility or community program. One of our strongest features is that we tailor our resources to your specific needs,objectives,and time constraints.With over 200 rasources available,we can provide specific suggestions to assist you. If you have a question, please cor'_sct us,If you need help selecting the right materials, please visit our more detailed consultation form. Programming ;areas d� Healthy Youth Survey Fact Sheet 5 y Peer-Individual Risk Factors for Ellen Ochoa Middle School (Pasco School District) Year: 2010 Grade; 8 Gender: Both Number of Students Surveyed: 247 Background; • Research shows that the risk factors measured by the Healthy Youth Survey are linked to adolescent substance use,delinquency,violence,school dropout,and other risky health behaviors. • The attitudes kids have about drug use strongly influence the likelihood they will use drugs. Families and communities should model health attitudes and choices. Peer-Individual Risk Factors Peer-Individual Risk Factor Trends Grade 8,2010 Gradexxx S 80% --&-Perceived Risk of Drug Use(RF) Attitudes Favor Drug Use(RF) -4-Friends Use Drugs(RF) Intentions to Use Drugs(RF) 70% s5,o/a 10% 60% 46% 60% m 40%50% 32% 50% !;0 40% o 40% 30% `0 30% a 20% 20% 10% 10% 0 0% RF:%At Risk RF:%At Risk RF%At Risk RR%At Risk Pe iv Isk Attitude&favor Fri ds Use I ienr ns to orug Ilse Dn,g Us® n gslse�nrss 2004 2006 2008 2010 Prevalence` 2004' ;: 200'6 21DOO r 2010 Perceived Risk of 510ya +11 52% All 50% :Ell 54% +10 In 2010,32%of 8th graders in our s were at risk for favorable Drug Use (RF) atfltudes towards drugs. Attitudes Favor Drug Use(RF) 40°° til 34% 10' 34% f11 32% $ Friends Use Drugs 47% t12 50% mil 34% +11* 40% t9 (RF) Perceived Risk of Drug Use(RF) Intentions to Use 44% ±12 39% --i:1l 38% ±11 460/o +9 Compared to the State,All Grades,2010 Drugs (RF) 80 Local State 70% 60% From 2008 to 2010, there has been no change in the perceived risk 50% of drug use among 8th graders in ours. m Z! 40°fo .y>. _ 30% r. 20% For More Information: • Parents,schools,kids,and communities can work together to keep 109° M youth safe.To see how State and local partners are addressing these 0% issues,see listings on the w,,v,v.AskHYS.net homepage. 6th 8th 1Uth 12th For free guides on preventing alcohol and other drug use,call Washington State Alcohol/Drug Information Clearinghouse: Prevalence 6th Still i0th 12th 1-800-662-9111. Local 62% ±7* 54°/n I' "; • For non-State resources,parents can go t0' ,'vvr:.ortlgirea.olg. +10* Prevention professionals should see iliip:llcatatus.santhsa.gov; .astf t ii. State 40% f2 38% +3 39% ±3 48% +2 Prevalence Is displayed with 95%confidence intervals(as t or black bar a) Washington HYS results generated at .on 07-21-2011 indicates a significant change,p<0 05 Missing codes:S=result suppresser)due to insufficient reporting from students of schools;NIP=iocation did not participate in the survey this year, NIG=grade not available: NIS=question was not surveyed this year NIA=question was not asked of this grade;NalG=this gender was not at this lacailon Rene rinch-b- ed Rise �actors SA=Suiistance Muse San=School Drop-out D= Delinquency V=Violence T P—Teen I)regnmlcy D&A Depression and .Anxiety r :`hillll�rttll tai •,ili;•,`;(,,{i�r- ���si I�.` I[ir 'a�Ibl '�t;` {}l:•t'; Avallabliityof Drugs x x AvailabllRyof Firearms x x Col)hintiiiity Lavis an(i Nornls l=avorableTovtar(l Drug Use,Firearms,and X x x Crime f,�e(riaPortrayaisofVialence x i TransitionsatldMobility X X k x k Lotv f4eigliboriiooclAttacl)lnei)lat)(ICoi)it)1{inilVDlsorgai)izatlol7 x x x I Extre1lefto11on1IcDeprivation 1 ff X x X X X I Family History of the Problem Behavior x x x x x x FanlliyManagementprobiellls x x x x x x j FamIlyConfllct x x x x k x Favorable ParentalAttitUd esancilnvolvementlnthe Problem Behavior x x x � Academic Failure Beginning In Late ElenlentarySchool x x x x x x R' Lackof Commitment to School x x x x x i Early and Persistent Antisocial Behavior Rebelliousness x x x x l Frien dsMoEngageli)theProblemBebavlor x x x x x Favorable Attitudes-rowarcl the Problem Behavior x x x x x Early Initiation of tile Problem Behavior X x x x x ConstitulionalFactors x x x x Tabu lb: Total Pregnancies by Woman's Age and County of Residence - 'Washington Sta... Page l of 1 Table 16. Total Pregnancies' by Woman's Age and County of Residence, 2010 All Age County Ages < 15 15-19 15-17 18-19 20-24 25-29 30-3.4 35-39 40-44 45+ Unk State Total 108,045 129 9,348 2,913 6,435 25,526 30,813 25,597 13,057 3,264 265 46 Adams 495 3 82 27 55 132 140 89 44 3 2 0 Asotin 299 1 38 18 20 102 84 51 16 7 0 0 Benton 2,956 2 331 109 222 841 834 588 290 68 2 0 Chelan 1,133 0 133 50 83 278 321 278 99 21 2 1 Clallam 806 1 91 29 62 215 233 184 66 16 0 0 Clark 6,679 6 564 166 398 1,597 1,957 1,597 748 185 20 5 Columbia 43 0 3 0 3 12 13 9 4 1 0 1 Cowlitz 1,389 1 166 45 121 451 394 265 85 22 2 3 Douglas 588 0 72 26 46 162 171 100 70 13 0 0 Ferry 79 0 8 4 4 25 28 16 1 1 0 0 Franklin 1,896 6 244 85 159 497 569 380 170 25 5 0 _, Garfield 21 0 7 0 1 4 5 8 1 2 0 0 Grant 1,816 4 239 85 154 581 495 325 139 31 2 0 Grays Harbor 1,020 1 123 35 88 320 312 177 75 11 1 0 Island 1,102 0 64 21 43 338 340 231 97 28 2 2 Jefferson 266 0 23 5 18 74 74 48 34 12 0 1 King 32,208 36 1,912 611 1,301 5,493 8,231 9,321 5,645 1,432 125 13 Kitsap 3,588 4 310 69 241 1,057 1,099 714 302 95 5 2 Kittitas 540 0 51 12 39 165 157 115 43 8 1 0 Klickitat 247 0 23 3 20 61 69 51 36 7 0 0 Lewis 1,127 7 144 41 103 362 337 187 74 15 1 0 Lincoln 101 0 11 4 7 30 26 16 13 5 0 0 Mason 792 1 96 32 64 234 234 139 73 12 2 1 Okanogan 636 2 97 31 66 186 164 107 69 11 0 0 Pacific 238 0 27 6 21 87 70 33 19 2 0 0 Pend Oreille 139 0 18 7 11 44 37 25 8 7 0 0 Pierce 14,014 12 1,331 403 928 3,850 4,355 2,835 1,276 318 27 10 San Juan 110 0 10 3 7 20 32 32 14 2 0 0 Skagit 1,782 6 208 78 130 433 518 390 180 41 5 1 Skamania 98 0 12 4 8 21 30 22 11 2 0 0 Snohomish 11,221 6 807 250 557 2,294 3,420 2,862 1,410 392 27 3 Spokane 6,945 6 641 187 454 1,908 2,086 1,505 636 152 11 0 Stevens 482 0 70 21 49 137 124 97 42 12 0 0 Thurston 3,801 3 303 83 220 953 1190 875 384 85 7 1 Wahkiakum 37 0 4 3 1 9 9 8 4 3 0 0 Walla Walla 772 0 80 20 60 186 231 174 77 23 1 0 Whatcom 2,866 6 236 70 166 664 837 693 331 91 7 1 Whitman 542 0 28 5 23 142 181 129 51 11 0 0 Yakima 5,166 15 747 265 482 1,561 1,405 917 420 92 8 1 11.nknown 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 4_ 0 0 0 0 1 Total Pregnancies equals the sum of live births, abortions, and fetal deaths. Source: Center for Health Statistics,Washington State Department of Health,0112012. Last Update: 10/8/2010 03:08 PM Table 17: Age-Specific Pregnancy Rates by County of Residence - Washington State Dep... Page 1 of 2 Table 17. Age-Specific Pregnancy Ratesl by County of Residence, 2010 Mi C,�unty .ages 15-19 16-17 13-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 State Tota12 79.7 41.6 21.9 70.2 114.3 130.9 114.5 58.9 14.4 Adams 135.4 110.5 56.7 206.8 2211 222.2 141.5 79.0 Asotin 79.8 55.7 44.6 71.9 167.8 124.6 87.5 28.6 11.0 Benton 87.0 52.8 27.3 97.2 155.1 142.0 107.0 54.6 121 Chelan 87.9 52.5 31.3 88.9 137.6 154.3 136.3 47.6 9.8 Clallam 79.6 49.6 25.9 86.6 134.9 139.2 1141 40.5 9.0 Clark 78.9 38.7 17.7 76.5 130.8 145.5 109.9 50.0 12.4 Columbia 76.1 146.3 147.7 121.6 a Cowlitz 75,0 47.4 20.8 90.4 157.5 137.5 88.9 27.6 6.8 Douglas 82.4 51.8 27.5 102.9 154.1 148.6 83.8 59.2 11.1 Ferry 72.2 36.2 * 141.2 171.8 106.7 Franklin 115.4 81.4 45.9 138.7 186.9 185.6 130.0 64.4 11.7 Garfield 66.9 106.4 153.8 Grant 106.7 70.4 413 115.3 210.3 174.9 115.0 51.3 12.5 Grays Harbor 84.8 54.2 25.3 98.9 164.3 160.2 92.9 39.1 5.4 Island 84.0 28.7 14.3 56.7 149.8 147.4 113.0 47.9 12.4 Jefferson 74.6 35.0 11.6 78.9 1523 145.1 81.1 56.3 16.8 King 76.6 33.3 182 54.7 85.6 104.3 125.1 77.1 19.9 Kitsap 78.5 37.6 13.5 77.1 139.3 143.9 103.1 42.7 11.5 Kittitas 57.6 26.2 20.7 28.5 52.1 127.7 114.5 43.3 7.8 K.lickitat 78.7 36.9 96.6 153.3 159.4 95.7 62.2 12.2 Lewis 87.5 60.1 27.9 111.4 177.8 160.3 89.5 35.6 6.9 Lincoln 69.2 34.3 64.2 170.5 122.6 69.9 53.1 18.1 Mason 84.7 55.8 30.1 97.1 173.8 147.4 94.8 46.3 7.2 Okanogan 96.0 74.6 36,5 146.3 193.3 155.5 102.8 61.0 9.7 Pacific 85.8 53.6 18.7 114.8 207,6 160.2 782 41.6 ' Pend Oreille 75.7 47.1 24.9 108.9 179.6 142.3 92.6 25.2 19.4 Pierce 84.5 48.6 243 85.7 139.7 147.9 104.6 483 11.4 San Juan 53.4 27.0 70.7 81.3 100.3 97.0 39.9 Skagit 85.7 53.6 31.7 91.7 135.6 146,0 117.0 52.7 12.0 Skamania 53.3 35.4 71.4 97.2 115.8 71.2 30.7 * Snohomish 77.5 33.8 16.5 63.4 108.4 140,6 118.6 56.6 14.9 Spokane 72.8 37.0 20.0 56.9 100.2 128.6 105.7 45.8 10.4 Stevens 71.9 46.5 19.9 109.1 173.0 142.0 91.3 37.6 8.9 Thurston 75.3 36.4 16.5 66.5 115.9 135.2 104.1 46.3 10,1 Wahkiakum 78.4 * * 180.0 140.6 101.3 Walla Walla 69.1 33.0 17.7 46.5 78.4 141.6 110.4 50.2 14.0 Whatcom 66.9 29.4 19.0 38.3 66.0 1219 116.1 56.9 147 Whitman 41.5 8.9 8.9 8.8 27.1 1051 116.8 57.0 11.7 Yakima 1078 78.5 44.4 136.1 196.7 172.2 118.4 564 12.9 1 The general pregnancy rate shown under"All Ages"equals total pregnancies(live births, fetal deaths,plus abortions) per 1,000 women of childbearing age(15-44). Age-Specific rate equal the number of pregnancies to women in a specific age group per 1,000 women in the age group. 2 Total pregnancies includes 5 abortions for which county of residence was unknown. Table 18: Live Births by Woman's Age and County of Residence - Washington State Dep... Page 1 of 1 Table 18. Live Births by Woman's Age and County of Residence, 2010 All Age County Ages <15 15-19 15-17 18-19 20-24 26-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 46+ Unk State Total 86,480 55 5,993 1,724 4,269 18,622 25,562 22,466 11,068 2,506 194 14 Adams 468 0 79 26 53 123 135 83 43 3 2 0 Asotin 242 0 27 12 15 82 74 43 12 4 0 0 Benton 2,530 2 235 70 165 705 742 532 258 54 2 0 Chelan 1,011 0 111 42 69 241 301 255 86 16 1 0 Clallam 679 1 57 19 38 185 206 165 51 14 0 0 Clark 5,480 4 364 93 271 1,247 1,669 1,406 629 143 16 2 Columbia 39 0 3 0 3 9 13 9 4 1 0 0 Cowlitz 1,193 0 132 32 100 375 345 244 77 18 2 0 Douglas 524 0 56 20 36 146 153 95 63 11 0 0 Ferry 64 0 5 4 1 20 24 14 1 0 0 0 Franklin 66 6 186 63 125 421 526 342 155 20 3 0 Garfield 21 0 1 0 1 4 5 8 1 2 0 0 Grant 1,637 4 203 68 135 521 453 301 126 28 1 0 Grays Harbor 846 1 95 23 72 273 254 156 59 8 0 0 Is#and 929 0 35 7 28 270 301 212 84 24 2 1 Jefferson 199 0 14 2 12 52 57 39 29 7 0 1 King 24,514 10 943 276 667 3,261 6,244 8,054 4,790 1,107 100 5 Kitsap 2,931 1 196 37 159 822 939 643 252 75 2 1 Kittitas 424 0 25 7 18 116 139 103 35 6 0 0 Klickitat 226 0 20 3 17 51 67 49 33 6 0 0 Lewis 926 2 96 21 75 305 290 160 60 12 1 0 Lincoln 95 0 9 3 6 28 26 16 13 3 0 0 Mason 622 0 59 16 43 182 192 122 60 6 1 0 Okanogan 570 1 81 23 58 164 154 99 61 10 0 0 Pacific 201 0 16 2 14 76 63 29 16 1 0 0 Pend Oreille 119 0 15 4 11 38 32 22 7 5 0 0 Pierce 10,686 5 795 220 575 2,711 3,502 2,413 1,025 218 14 3 San Juan 99 0 8 3 5 16 31 30 12 2 0 0 Skagit 1,471 2 149 57 92 332 454 341 159 33 1 0 Skamania 88 0 8 3 5 19 27 21 11 2 0 0 Snohomish 9,001 1 467 137 330 1,601 2,895 2,515 1,205 299 18 0 Spokane 5,788 1 452 123 329 1,489 1,827 1,355 541 115 8 0 Stevens 431 0 59 16 43 117 116 89 39 11 0 0 Thurston 2,955 1 180 42 138 660 987 753 310 56 7 1 Wahkiakum 33 0 3 2 1 7 9 8 4 2 0 0 Walla Wai#a 660 0 59 13 46 158 194 160 68 20 1 0 Whatcorn 2,321 3 140 32 108 454 736 628 282 71 7 0 Whitman 422 0 12 3 9 73 160 119 48 10 0 0 Yakima 4 374 10 596 200 396 1,268 1,220 833 359 83 5 0 Source: Center for Health Statistics,Washington State Department of Health,01/2012 Last Update: 1008/2010 03:08 PM Table 19: Age Specific Live Birth Rates by County of Residence - Washington State Dept... Page I of 2 Table 19. Age Specific Live Birth Rates' by County of Residence, 2010 Ail County Ages 15-19 15-17 13-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-AA State Total 63.8 26.7 13.0 46.6 83.4 108.6 100.5 49.9 11.0 Adams 128.0 106.5 54.6 199.2 206.0 214.3 132.0 77.2 Asotin 64.6 39.6 29.7 54.0 134.9 109.8 73.8 21.4 " Benton 74.5 37.5 17.5 723 130.0 126 3 96.8 48.6 9.6 Chelan 78.4 43.8 263 73.9 119.2 144.7 125.0 41.4 7.5 Clallam 67.1 31.1 17.0 53.1 1161 123.1 102.4 31.3 7.9 Clark 64.8 25.0 9.9 52.1 102.2 124.1 96.8 42.0 9.6 Columbia 69.0 * 109.8 147.7 121.6 " Cowlitz 64.4 37.7 14.8 74.7 131.0 120.4 81.9 25.0 5.6 Douglas 73.4 40.3 21.2 80.5 138.9 132.9 79.6 53.3 9.4 Ferry 58.5 22.6 113.0 147.2 93.3 j Franklin 101.1 62.8 34.1 109.1 1583 171.6 1j7.0_ 58.7 Garfield • 106.4 153.8 Grant 96.2 59.8 33.0 101.0 188.6 160.1 106.5 46.5 11.3 Grays Harbor 70.3 41.8 16.7 80.9 1401 130.5 81.9 34.7 3.9 Island 70.8 15.7 4.8 36.9 119.7 130.5 1037 41.4 10.6 Jefferson 55.8 21.3 " 52.6 107.0 111.8 65.9 48.0 9,8 King 58.3 16.4 8.2 28.0 50.8 79.1 108.1 65.4 15.4 Kitsap 64.1 23.8 7.2 50.8 108.3 123.0 92.8 357 9.1 Kittitas 45.2 12.8 12.0 13.1 36.6 113.1 102.6 35.2 5.8 Klickitat 72.0 32.1 82.1 128.1 154.7 91.9 57.0 10.5 Lewis 71.9 40.1 14.3 81.1 149.8 138.0 76.6 28.8 5,5 Lincoln 65.1 28.0 55.0 159.1 122.6 69.9 53.1 " Mason 66.5 34.3 15.1 65.3 135.2 120.9 83.2 38.0 3.6 Okanogan 86.1 62.3 27.1 128.6 170.5 146.0 95.1 53.9 8.8 Pacific 72.4 31.7 * 76.5 181 A 1442 68.7 35.0 " Bend Oreille 64.9 39.3 108.9 155.1 123.1 81.5 22.1 13.9 Pierce 64.4 29.0 13.3 53.1 98.3 118.9 89.0 38.8 7.8 San Juan 48.1 21.6 50.5 65.0 97,2 90.9 34.2 " Skagit 70.8 38.4 23.1 64.9 104.0 127.9 102.3 46.6 9.7 Skamania 47.8 23.6 44.6 88.0 104.2 68.0 30.7 Snohomish 62.2 19.5 9.1 37.6 75.7 119.0 104.2 48.3 11.3 Spokane 60.7 26.1 13.2 41.2 78.2 112.6 95-1 39.0 7.8 Stevens 64.3 39.2 15.1 95.8 147.7 132.9 83.7 34.9 8.1 Thurston 58.5 21.6 8.4 41.7 80.3 1121 89.6 37.4 6.7 Wahkiakum 69.9 * * 140.0 140.6 101.3 Walla Walla 59.0 24.3 11.5 35.7 66.6 118.9 101.5 44.4 12.2 Whatcom 54 2 17.4 8.7 24.9 45.1 108.9 105.2 48.5 11.5 Whitman 32.3 3.8 • 3.5 14.0 92.9 107.8 53.7 10.7 Yakima 91.2 62.7 33.5 111.8 159.8 149.5 107.5 48.2 11.6 1 The general fertility rate shown under"All Ages"equals tetaf live births per 1,000 women of childbearing age (15-44).Age-Specific rate equal the number of live births to women in a specific age group per 1,000 women in the age group. Rate not calculated because number of events was less than 5. Population Data: See Appendix A:Technical Appendix,Sources of Data: Population. RECE1VED 2v 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASd'd41ft,; v COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND J7i'?1C DEVE 0P14EAl7 AGENCY: Downtown Pasco Authority PROTECT TITLE: Pasco Specialty Kitchen ADDRESS: 110 S.4s'Pasco Washington 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: same AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Victoria Silvernail E-MAIL: Victoria @pascospecialtykitchen.cam PHONE: 509-545-1172 FAX: 509-545-1174 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 65,000.00 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 47,066.00 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): 2002 the Pasco Specialty Kitchen was created as an incubator kitchen to create specialty food businesses. The location is 110 SAth Ave. Pasco Washington.This property replaced two blighted properties and brought the possibility of new jobs and small businesses to a low to moderate-income population. PSK helps small businesses with an affordable infrastructure,educational support and guidance with small business decisions and marketing plans.PSK offers technical assistance to client in the following area: • Local, State and Federal Licensing • Insurance Requirements • Permits • Labeling and Packaging • Training Facility for Special Permits • Marketing • Business&Marketing Planning • Business Classes + Manufacturing PSK has developed an excellent working relationship with local commerce resources such as Columbia community Business Center,Benton Franklin Development Council and Tridec thusly providing a unique one-stop shop for new businesses. Assistance is provided to help clients understand their position in the market.Ongoing marketing by PSK provides client product exposure in both retail and wholesale markets in the Pacific Northwest and the world by way of PSK's WEB site.PSK has the following Certifications and approval from the state of Washington; • Department of Health • Department of Agriculture • Organic Certification For Food Preparation and Processing Our kitchen serves both Pasco High School Commercial Foods Academy that provides educational training related to the food industry and entrepreneurship. Our Pasco High Schools have 68%of their students that are low to moderate-income. We continue to work with local restaurants and local hotels to create an internship positions that could be filled with our best performers with good attendance and give them a soft step to the workforce with experience. Our clients sign an agreement to consider low to moderate income persons for their created jobs. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: PSK offers potential new businesses an affordable certified commercial kitchen to develop and perfect their products. Commercial food preparation equipment can be costly in a startup business; it can be the deciding point of not developing a 7,011(,DRC,Annliratinn Pace I business. Funding for food service businesses is extremely difficult to obtain from lending institutions for experienced food businesses and near impossible for startup operators. PSK is a Low Cost Pay Per Hour concept permitting people with very little available capital to incrementally develop and market food products in a real commercial kitchen 24hours 7days a week.This has permitted PSK clients to bootstrap themselves into a self sustaining food service venture be it retail or as a wholesaler to grocery outlets.Without PSK's resources these small business individuals would find it impossible to experience success as an entrepreneur.PSK's clients represent a wide ethnicity with African American,Hispanic, Asian and Caucasian present. The PSK facility is an 11,000 square foot building located in downtown Pasco. The building houses the equipment and resources shown below: • 4 Convection Ovens • Walk-In Freezer • Walk-Refrigerator • Commercial Bread Mixer • Compartmentalized Lockable Storage Space • 3 Stovetop Ranges with Lower Ovens • 60 Gallon Steam Kettle • Filler caper&Compressor The funding is critical for the growth of our clients and the continued operation of PSK. This grant helps pay the following expenses: • 1 Full Time Salary and 1Part Time Salary • Payroll Taxes • Administration Expenditures • Administrative Service Contract This grant makes it possible for small businesses to keep their start-up cost affordable. We charge the clients an affordable fee for kitchen time, freezer and refrigerator space and dry storage. Keeping these costs affordable is vital to the success of our small business clients.We need to keep this valuable asset in operation for the City of Pasco and our local economy We have clients that are Low to Moderate-income;Pasco High Students,Elderly and Retired Owners,Women Head of Household and Minorities.The kitchen serves as a base for Pasco High Schools Commercial Foods Academy that provides educational training related to the food industry and entrepreneurship.Our students receive grades for this class that is taught in our kitchen.This program is a base for future small businesses in our area to open the prospect of future business growth and the creation of more low to moderate jobs.This contract with the Pasco School District add to our revenue for the administration of the kitchen. This is an economic development tool designed to create jobs and accelerate growth and success of small businesses through business support,resources and services. Our incubator food business kitchen creates jobs,revitalize neighborhoods,adds new products to the market and strengthen our local economy. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) By providing an affordable commercial incubator kitchen food business facility and assistance related to businesses development,marketing,and training. The kitchen(located downtown Pasco)meets the following;Strategic Action Plan goals;1.Strategy#1 Support businesses that create jobs for low to moderate income residents. Objective 1.1 provides assistance to existing or new micro enterprises and other businesses to hire or retain low-moderate income workers and low- income business owners.Goal 1 Strategy##4 Support activities that improve the quality of the local workforce and prepare lower income and special needs workers to access living wage jobs.Objective 4.1 Support training and work skills programs/projects that prepare lower income workers to be gainfully employed in local industries and businesses. Goal 1. Strategy#5 Support facilities, infrastructure or other eligible improvement to assist businesses that need economic development assistance by virtue of their qualifying,physical environment or demographic conditions;to create a living wage jobs and/or economic opportunities. Objective 5.1 support a range of eligible special economic development activity,to address development needs in the following targeted re-development strategy area:Pasco Downtown Area 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached AIocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section 11 in Allocation Policy): 9.013 M90 Annliratinn Fave 7 Priority:XA ❑B ®C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Ongoing 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: The funding is critical for the growth of our clients and the continued operation of PSK.This grant helps pay the following expenses: • 1 Full Time Salary and 1 Part Time Salary • Payroll Taxes Administration Expenditures + Administrative Service Contract This grant makes it possible for small businesses to keep their start-up cost affordable.We charge the clients an affordable fee for kitchen time,freezer and refrigerator space and dry storage. Keeping these costs affordable is vital to the success of our small business clients. We need to keep this valuable asset in operation for the City of Pasco and our local economy 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑YES Z NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) l)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)1-1 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract 9 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)[D Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum.&BIight Area/Spot(as designed by local government 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE 9..01 MR(I Annliratinn Pace Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ONo Year program began?2002 If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? Same 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance, a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: M Continuation of Services []New Service ❑Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Richland $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? None at this time but always researching other options 7011 C'.T)Rn Annficatinn PaPP.4 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: PSK's Location... z $ w er.�a �� "-.. i �z �► z � .M s r �,tl,.v n � E\r�• r. } wAft 'h A.l wA';, ' w wax 110 S. 411 Ave Pasco, a 99352 a•u and Journey Past NPECEAL Y KITCHEN Today 2013_CDBGApplication 5 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an MARCH 4FULL 2 PART TIME JUNE 4 FULL 3 PART TIME SEPTEMBER 4 FULL 3 PART TIME DECEMBER 3 FULL TIME 2 PART TIME 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: 1)FULL TIME Pasco School 1)PART TIME/LM District Contract: Commercial Foods Academy Salaries 39,850.00 30,000.00 9,850.00 Benefits 7,500.00 7,500.00 OPERATIONS: Retail Shop the All other Expenses 14,707.00 14,707.00 Northwest.corn Clients Hourly Charges and Facility Rent 17,468.00 17,468.00 Utilities Supplies 3,900.00 3,900.00 CONSTRUCILON: Labor/Contracts 10,256.00 PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER:(describeEDC/Admin 20,000.00 20,000.00 Mktg/Advt Fee Equipment Repair 2,639.00 2,639.00 Chambers Dues Small Equipment 2,564.00 2,564.00 Used as Marketing Tool $1,850.00 TOTAL $118,884.00 $50,000.00 $68,884.00 $ ?ni i cnR(,Annlicntinn Additional explanation of the above budget: Other expenses include advertising and Marketing Membership all 4 Chambers(Pasco Chamber,Tri-Cities Regional Chamber,Hispanic Chamber,West Richland Chamber,TVCB Conventions these help bring awareness of our facility.Our clients use these Chambers as a marketing tool. The other expenses relate to memberships and the operation of the kitchen. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served, etc.? Our goal is to keep the costs affordable to our small business clients.This is vital for their success.My goal is to increase the number of clients that use the kitchen. 1 will continue to research farmers looking to add value to their products.Manufacturing is an area we are continuing to develop. We have added some equipment to reach these goals.l will always be looking for revenue sources even in this economic time of crisis. 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ®Person,or by[]Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 20 Number of clients below 50%median 18 Number of clients below 80%median 8 Number of elderly clients 11 Number of minority clients 15 Total Number of Pasco residents served 18 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Tax Forms/Job Profiles/Signed Contracts 2012 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick—Pasco--kichland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,450 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30-110-0- $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,t50 $53,450 $57,750 $6,2050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only,2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be Current Clients with added created/retained employees 54(32)FTE add the 17 High School students from Pasco High Schools 71 Number of new jobs expected to be filled or All our added Employees are LM offered to low-or moderate-income persons 68% (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this Owner/Managers Cooks program year(Use EDA Classifications) Manufacturing,Workforce 18. CONTACT INFORMATION ?nii rr)RO AnnCirAtion PaaP 7 Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Victoria Silvernail Mana>~er Victoria Silvernail Manager Victoria Silvernail Manager Mailing Address 110 S 4t'Ave City/State Pasco Washington 99301 Phone/Fax 509-545-1172 phone 509-5451174 Fax Email victoria @pascosnecialtykitchen.com SUBMITTED BY: Manager 6/5/2012 Signature a orized Official Title Date 9013 C ORG Annlicatinn Pane A 2.38 PM Pasco Specialty Kitchen 06/05/12 Profit & Loss Budget vs. Actual Accrual Basis January through December 2011 Jan-Dec 11 Budget $Over Budget %of Budget Ordinary Income/Expense Income 4000G-Key Fee 550.00 4000A-Retail Sales 7.53 1,000.00 -992.47 0.8% 40006-Equipment Rentals 21,561.00 16,400.00 5,161.00 131.5% 4000C-Facility Rental Fees 44,999.50 38,000.00 6,999.50 118.4% 4000D-Prof Service Agreement 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 100.0% 4000E-Donations 0.00 200.00 -200.00 0.0% 4000E-Mktg/Advt.Fee Income 1,850.00 4000M-Miscellaneous Income 216.72 Total Income 119,184.75 105,600.00 13,584.75 112.9% Gross Profit 119,184.75 105,600.00 13,584.75 112.9% Expense 6008 Membership and Dues 250.00 5037P-AdministrationlEDC 20,000.02 14,000.00 6,000.02 142.9% 6009 PDDA Membership 150.00 6010-PSK Insurance 0.00 300.00 -300.00 0.0% 6050 PSK Operating Expense 2,481.11 2,000.00 481.11 124.1% 6050G Operating Exp.Gift Shop 180.84 150.00 30.84 120.6010 6070A-PSK AdvertisinglMarketi 3,887.99 3,000.00 887.99 129.6% 6070E-PSK Computer 1,434.59 1,000.00 434.59 143.5% 6070C-PSK Office Supplies 920.16 500.00 420.16 184.0% 6070D-PSK Janitorial Supplies 2,980.56 1,600.00 1,380.56 186.3% 6090A-PSK Garbage 1,78926 1,600.00 189.26 111.8% 6090B-PSK Gas 6,893.02 4,500.00 2,393.02 153.2% 60900-PSK Electric 8,990.41 7,200.00 1,790.41 124.9% 6090D-PSK Water 1,585.34 1,000.00 585.34 158.5% 6090S Dues and Subscriptions 525.00 150.00 375.00 350.0% 6095-PSK Postage&Frieght 70.78 200.00 -129.22 35.4% 70001-PSK AccountinglLegal 1,006.25 300.00 706.25 335.4% 7000)-PSK ContractLbr-Janitor 10,256.03 7,000.00 3,256,03 146.5% 7050A-PSK Building Repairs 432.66 2,000.00 -1,567.34 21.6% 70508-PSK Equipt Repair/Service 2,207.77 3,500.00 -1,292.23 63.1% 7050C Maintenance 171.34 7075P-PSK Telephone 921.26 1,200.00 -278.74 76.8% 7075Q-PSK Internet Services 717.96 600.00 117.96 119.7% 7575C Cell Phone 1,127.88 600.00 52788 188.0% 7585 PSK Travel&Meals 1,401.45 1,200.00 201.45 116.8% 7595 PSK Small Equipment 1,130.19 9,000.00 -7,869.81 12.6% Maintenance 29.23 Miscellaneous 0.00 100.00 -100.00 0.0% Payroll Expenses 39,850.91 39,000.00 850.91 102.2% Payroll Tax Expense 7,491.90 3,900.00 3,591.90 192.1% Void 0.00 Total Expense 118,883.91 105,600.00 13,283.91 112.6% Net Ordinary Income 300.84 0.00 300.84 100.0% Other Income/Expense Other Income Interest Income 6.26 Other Income 1,514.78 Total Other Income 1,521.04 Other Expense Other Expenses 169.39 Total Other Expense 169.39 Net Other Income 1,351.65 Net Income 1,652.49 0.00 1,652.49 100.0% Pagel 1. 9.11:10112.I RECEIVED 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO JUN 0 4 2012 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDEQ)0f,,yN? & ECQN01r11C I?EVECQA61EN7 AGENCY: Downtown Pasco Development Authority PROJECT TITLE: Downtown Facade Improvement(2 facades) ADDRESS: P.O. Box 688,Pasco, WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 4h& Lewis(21.201,202);see map in Item 13 AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL —Amy Kuchler,Executive Director E-MAIL: amy@downtownpasco.com PHONE: (509)546-1304 FAX: n/a AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 60,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ Will vary on the cost of individual facades—estimated at$15,000 to$60,000 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Facade improvements increase retail sales, shopper visits,and continue the process of economic revitalization for the downtown area. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Replace and/or update existing storefronts on an estimated 2 buildings to expand economic opportunities and increase jobs 3, CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal 1; Improve Local Economies Strategy 5, Objective 5.I 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section 11 in Allocation Policy): Priority: ®A ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain bow your proposal satisfies that priority: Fagade Improvements make a positive visual impact and revitalize the downtown area. improved facades also generate additional retail traffic which results in the need for additional employees and creates jobs _ 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Late Autumn 2013 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Desi materials and labor for facade replacement/revision 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ® NO 8. ELIGIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a}; ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): 2013 CDBG Application FINAL Page 1 ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): 9 Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201())24 CFR 570.203: Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c}: Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 202 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)Z Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)0 Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ZNo Year program began? 2007 If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? CDBG funds will be requested for 2014 projects. If less funds are received, fewer businesses will be assisted. 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ 60,000 $ 0 $ $0,000 Richland $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Kennewick $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Other Federal $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 2013 CDBG Application FINAL Page 2 Sources) To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? n/a 2013 CDBG Application FINAL page 3 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: m HENRY 5T , Legend ; '�� N DPDA Boundary 1AARCA�ef s#, Sx - ` W f Expanded Facade Improvement Area PARK ST original Facade Improvement Area $ NWON 67 US memsmazo so LU d 8 m — } W d d x Q 4 4 * ?d 1 d d Y � Y � T ` ; Downtown Pasco �` Development Authority 2013 CDBG Application FINAL Page 4 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if any) Design Approval June 2013 Bidding Complete/ September 2013 Contract Approval Construction Complete November 2013 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries $0 Benefits $0 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease $0 Utilities $0 Supplies $0 CONSTRUCTION: Architectural $6,000 Engineering $4,000 Materials $50,000 Labor/Contracts $15,000 -$60,000 Owner match PROPERTY: Purchase price n/a Closing cost n/a OTHER: (describe) n/a TOTAL $ ::Is 60,000 r15,6-00-$60,000 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? The amount of funding received will determine the total number of facades we are able to complete. 2013 CDBG Application FINAL Page 5 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: [EPerson,or by❑Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median I Number of clients below 50%median 2 Number of clients below 80%median Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Total Number of Pasco residents served 3 (Should=total##above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Census data 2012 HUD income Limit Quidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50°/a $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only,2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be 3 3 created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or 3 3 offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%0) Position Titles Expected to be Created this Sales,Office&Clerical,and/or program year(Use EDA Classifications) Service Workers 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Amy Kuchler Mailing Address P.O. Box 688 City/State Pasco,WA 99301 Phone/Fax 15091546-1304 Email amy u:downtownnasco,com SUBMITTED BY: Executive Director June 4,2012 Signature of Authorized Official Title Date 2013 CDBG Application FINAL Page 6 • 4 S RECEIVED JUN 0 8 2012 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FAPOLINITY& ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: City of Pasco—Administrative&Community Services PROJECT TITLE: LID#149 Special Assessment Assistance ADDRESS: 525 N 3`d Ave Pasco WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: SW Quarter of Section 28 Township 9 North Range 30E.,W.M. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Rick Terway,Director A&CS E-MAIL: ter-wayr@pasco-wa.gov PHONE: 509-543-5757 FAX: 509-543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 99,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ I, DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Substandard road and street lighting and no sidewalks 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: LID 149 proposes to widen streets and install curbs,gutters and sidewalks,a storm drain system and street lighting. There are 17 households below poverty level in this area that will require LID assistance. An LID Assistance fund is proposed to provide assistance to those income eligible individuals to pay the special assessment. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s) listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal II: Improve Community Infrastructure,Revitalize Neighborhoods,and Meet Unanticipated Needs • Number of lower-income households assisted with LID assessment payments • Number of projects providing handicapped access • Number of projects that either improve the basic infrastructure Strategy 1: Expand or improve basic community infrastructure in lower-income neighborhoods while minimizing costs to households below 80%of area median income. Objective 1.1: Provide assistance to lower income households that participate in local improvement districts for water, sewer,curbs,gutters,street paving,electrical,and sidewalk systems.Assistance may be limited to certain neighborhoods or to the most needy households based upon a percentage of median income and fund availability. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section 11 in Allocation Policy): Priority: 0A 0 ❑ C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: A. High Priority 1. Bricks and mortar projects resulting in visual physical improvements(engineering and architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15%of funded project cost) a. Projects to reduce barriers for physically impaired persons. b. Acquisition,construction or improvements to public facility. c. Neighborhood preservation and revitalization 2013 LID 149 CDBG App.docx Pagel 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Summer 2013 5. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Provide LID Assistance to income eligible households to pay the special assessment for improved streets, storm water, curbs, gutters and street lighting 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALIBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES MNO 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing,rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Plannine 24 CFR 570.205: Other(describe): Direct household assistance for payment of LID special assessments 24 CFR 201(n) 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1) ❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2) 9 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ® Downtown Revitalization Zone Kurtzman Park Neighborhood 0 Census Tract#201 3) ❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4) ❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5) ❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes Z No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑Continuation of Services ❑ New Service ❑ Increase in Service 2013 LID 149 CDBG App.doex Page 2 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ 65,000 S 12,000 0 Richland $ $ S Kennewick $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? 2013 LID 149 CDBG App.docx Page 3 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: � as rI•; ,, 4 owl /rY 4 p LU 0� LLI LU ,J�'A T --- _ AL TON ST w dw * [1! .� Q W > a„ d Q KALIS.PELL CT •�e�Q CU fUTTE lITT ^,_ erg. E CT - GL NDIVE CL - "A" ST Neighborhood Improvement Area 2013 LID 149 CDBG App.docx Page 4 14. PROTECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if an 6/2012 Project out to bid 912012 Construction commences 3/2013 Project completion 16/2013 Final Assessment 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY. Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) 99,000 Amount Requested to pay for assessment for qualifying Low/Moderate Income Households TOTAL $ $ $ $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? Will only pay for low income households,not moderate. 2013 LID 149 CDBG App.docx Page 5 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: QPerson,or by El Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 1,500+/- Number of clients below 50%median 1,300+/- Number of clients below 80%median 1,200+/- Number of elderly clients 250+/- Number of minority clients 1,200+/- Total Number of Pasco residents served (Should= total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? 2012 HUD income Limit guidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People_ 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only,2013 Income.Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Mail ng Address City/State Phone/Fax Email SUBMITTED BY: Signature of Authorized Official Title Date 2013 LID 149 CDBG App.docx Page 6 RECEIVED 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO JUIV 0 r 2p COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBCR,F&,JD r&FCQNOft,fC DEVE(OPMF14T AGENCY: Benton Franklin Community Action Committee{CAC Community Action Connections} PROJECT TITLE: HOME BASE Affordable Housing ADDRESS: 720 W Court Street PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Multiple sites within the City of Pasco AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Judith A. Gidley,Executive Director E-MAIL: jgidley ,bfcac.org PHONE: 509-545-4042 FAX: 509-544-9691 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 160,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 90,294 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): The occupancy rate for rental units in the Tri/Cities is 99%,according to a recent survey reported in the Tri/City Herald. Because the occupancy rate is high,landlords are charging higher rents.The net effect for low/income families is to make housing more unavailable to them. Landlords are rejecting people,such as low-income tenants,in favor of 1'ahln tPnantc Thic makim renfid kin* C_ Uyh a.0 tale.one. lil tai1C ia1711liCfltion_eye.nl more.vital. 9i`° __ The most important goal of this project is to establish and/or maintain stable and affordable housing for those households in need of assistance. Filling the gaps in funding assistance will allow us to address housing first then assist the client in becoming stable in all other areas. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele; you will be serving: Funds will be used to purchase an apartment complex consisting of four/two bedroom apartments that would provide affordable/transitional housing for families who come from homelessness and are being case managed and supported by the CAC programs. _ The counties and cities are required to implement the goal set by the Washington State Legislature to reduce homelessness by 50% by 2015. BFCAC wishes to assist in the implementation of the 10 Year Homeless Plan for Benton and Franklin Counties of which the City of Pasco is a partner under an Interlocal Agreement. According to the local 2011 Point In Time Count—56 households with children/189 persons and 78 households without children/98 persons for a total of 287 persons who were temporally living with family or friends on that one night during the count. 79 persons were living in Emergency housing,244 persons in Transitional housing and 22 persons unsheltered and homeless on January 27,2011 in Benton and Franklin Counties. This project meet the needs of the 10 Year Housing Plan for Benton and Franklin Counties in the following ways. Number 1: GAPS IN SERVICES—Case Management and Assessment for all homeless populations and rental assistance for families with children and single adults Number 2: GAPS IN HOUSING—Transitional Housing for all homeless population with intensive case managed services Number 3 GAPS IN THE SYSTEM—Centralized intake,assessment and referral system for Homeless Housing Strategies Clients will be households with children whose household income is under 50%AMI with priority to those under 30% AMI. Outreach is completed through in service trainings provided to agencies in Benton and Franklin counties. Households are deemed eligible through the CAC Home Base Connections Center intake eligibility process.Once deemed eligible households receive an appointment with a family development specialist/case manager for assessment and placement if deemed appropriate. 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 1 A variety of services are provided through the Home Base Connections Center(HBCC)a one-stop for the homeless population of Benton and Franklin Counties. The HBCC which assesses and provides services for all households; i.e. intake,eligibility,assessment,housing stability plans,housing subsidies,prevention, shelter,transportation,essential needs,housing case management and other services as needed. By addressing their housing issues first we are better able to evaluate additional need as well as an opportunity to address the underlying cause of their housing crisis whether it criminal history,income,availability of affordable housing,inability to maintain affordable housing,unmet mental and medical issues or budget restrictions. BFCAC has partnerships with other agencies to link services. We are also able to assist with food,clothing,personal care and household items. BFCAC Family Development Specialists also provides mediation between tenant and landlord in order to maintain existing housing while the other issues are being addressed. Our goal is to reduce the recidivism rate of the household returning to homelessness or becoming at risk of losing their housing. By working closely with each household we are able to identify and assist the household to meet their basic needs, utilize available community resources and identify and secure financial resources with the final objective of establishing stable,affordable housing. All of those goals are necessary in order to maintain housing for the long term. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused, List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) _Expand the supply of affordable units by developing renter occupied housing. Goal IV Strategy 1-1.1 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: 0A ZB ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority:The priority focus is `Bricks and mortar proiects resultin2 in creation or preservation of houshi for... "special needs o ulation"...The impact of BFCAC owing a four plea to house four families will continue and expand the positive influence that BFCAC makes in the community in reducine homelessness and helping families to self-sufficiency. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Project will start upon notification of funding and complete as soon as possible or by December 31,2013. 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Property Acquisition 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑ YES ®NO 8. ELIGIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201 e : ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)!24 CFA 570203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.20ac): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) I)® You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH) 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 2 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ©Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)0 Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or'Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH--Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&BIight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ZYes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 20147 11, PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES N/A To be eligible for CDBG assistance, a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑New Service: ❑ Increase in Service 12, WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ $ $ Richland(Homeless Prevention) $ not open at this time $ 10,142 $ 11,475 Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Sources) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? CHDO funds are committed as well as BFCAC local funds. 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 3 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: BFCAC can not identify a property at this time,so a map is not attached. Purchase will be within the City of Pasco. 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 4 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance proEess if an Timeline will depend on the date of acquisition 1'`Quarter Identify Pro perty 2" Quarter Environmental Review 3'Quarter Make Offer 4 Quarter Close and determine households to lease up 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies, office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES DINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries $15,000 $15,000 Local BFCAC Funds Benefits $4,000 $4,000 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease $51,294 $51,294 CHDO Funds Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price $ 196,000 $157,000 $39,000 CHDO Funds Closing cost $3,000 $3,000 OTHER: (describe) Renovations $45,816 $45,816 Local 2060 Funds TOTAL $315,110 $160,000 $155,110 Additional explanation of the above budget: We anticipate that the total costs of the uroiect will be as listed in the table above However,the breakdown between purchase price and rehabilitation cost will be dependent on the property purchased. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served, etc.? At this time BFCAC would have to seek other fupding source to make the proiect whole. 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 5 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ❑Person,or by 01-lousehold(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 2 Number of clients below 50%median 2 Number of clients below 80%median Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients 2 Total Number of Pasco residents served 4 households at any given time (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Estimated 2012 HUD income Limit uidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30°/v $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply, 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be N/A created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%°) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use FDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Judith A. Gilley Executive Director Judith A. Gidley, Executive Director To be identified Mailing?Address 720 W. Court Street City/State Pasco, WA 99301 Phone/Fax_ 509-545-4042 Email i¢idlevQbfcac.org S MITTED BY: ( Judith A.Gidley, Executive Director -June 6,2012 t ature of Authorized Official Title Date 2013 CDBG Application-Merge page 6 &LIage 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) FUND AGENCY: Catholic Family&Child Service C11 gr-n PROJECT TITLE: Volunteer Chore Services RE UCC IV r_0 ADDRESS: 2110 West Henry Pasco,WA 99301 JUN 0 6 2012 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: City of Pasco, WA CONl 41MITY& ECONOf^,iC LIEVELGPLIEN AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL John Young E-MAIL: jyoung@ccyakima.org PHONE: (509)965-7100 FAX: (509)972-0167 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 4000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 67,194 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): As people age they often experience obstacles that make it more difficult for them to continue living independently. Adults with disabilities,including those often associated with aging, may encounter a barrier to accessibility to their own homes. Limited mobility and the subsequent use of a walker or wheelchair can make safe and easy ingress and egress from the home an overwhelming challenge to their continued independence. Rising home repair costs,the inability to physically be able to make needed repairs themselves,and a lack of familiarity with local resources and building codes make it difficult for elders and adults with disabilities with a low to moderate income to maintain and modify their living areas to meet their special needs. The primary goal of Volunteer Chore Services is to help individuals with limited monetary resources and who often have a limited support system to continue living independently and safely and to prevent premature placement in congregate living facilities. The construction of a wheelchair ramp or the installation of grab bars are frequent requests made to VCS. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Volunteer Chore Services serves low-income elders over 60 and adults with disabilities in the City of Pasco. These individuals,with an income of no more than$1000 per month or$1500 per month for a couple,are in danger of being displaced or losing their independence due to obstacles that can be cost-effectively overcome. Volunteer Chore Services recruits community volunteers to serve eligible clients,and they are dispatched to clients' homes throughout the City of Pasco. Services to be provided with this grant will include projects that reduce physical barriers and enhance the safety of physically impaired individuals, such as the installation of hand rails or grab bars,construction of wheelchair ramps or special-sized steps to accommodate a walker,and other appropriate minor home repairs or modifications at the clients' homes. Volunteers are screened and receive appropriate training, including building code requirements,prior to beginning their volunteer service. All clients served with CDBG funds will meet the eligibility requirements of Volunteer Chore Services and CDBG. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal: Improve Community Infrastructure; Strategy 1: Expand or improve basic community infrastructure in lower-income neighborhoods; Objective 1.1:Provide assistance to lower-income households(providing handicapped access) Volunteer Chore Services will improve the infrastructure and safety of individual homes so that accessibility is improved for low to moderate income physically impaired adults. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority (A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): 2013 CDBG Application official Page I Priority: Lr'�_Nl A ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: December 31,2013 6, SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Materials for the construction of wheelchair ram s "super steps",handrails,grab bars,or other appropriate minor home modifications:volunteer mileage reimbursement for gp rp oved projects-required building permits 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑YES NO 8. ELIGIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24±CFR 570.201(x): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or ca itn al improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ® Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)0 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)® Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): M Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ® Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIRS ❑ Bantered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ---Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes [4No Year program began? 1999 or 2000 If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? VCS State contract,community donations 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES 2013 CDBG Application official Page 2 To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded, a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 11 WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ 4000 $ 6000 $ 6000 Richland $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Kennewick $ 0 $ 6000 $ 0 Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? None 2013 CDBG Application official Page 3 13. PROVIDE A MAP SNOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: City of Pasco, WA 2013 CDBG Application official Page 4 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if any) 3r Quarter: 4 projects—that reduce physical barriers and enhance the safety of physically impaired Jul 1—September,2013 individuals,as outlined in##2 above 41 Quarter: 3 projects—that reduce physical barriers and enhance the safety of physically impaired October 1—Dec 31 2013 individuals,as outlined in 42 above 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $ OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 26,576 26,576 State VCS funding Benefits 10,490 10,490 State VCS funding OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease 1550 1550 State VCS funding Utilities 1306 1306 State VCS funding Supplies 1290 1290 State VCS funding CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) 29,982 4000 25,982 Donations,VCS Volunteer expenses,agency State funding, admin,advertising,travel, ALTC client assistance,printing TOTAL 571,194 $4000 567,194 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? The number of clients served may be reduced if no other funding for materials is available 2013 CDBG Application official Page 5 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: [Person,or by OHousehold(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 5 Number of clients below 50%median 2 Number of clients below 80%median Number of elderly clients 5 Number of minority clients 2 Total Number of Pasco residents served 7 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? 2012 HUD income limit Guidelines for Kenne«°ick-Pasco-Richlmd 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%0) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title John Young,President and CEO D othv Morales, Regional Director Lauren Mathis, Coordinator Mailing Address 5301 Tieton Drive,Ste C 5301 Tieton Drive, Ste C 2110 West Henry City/State Yakima, WA Yakima,WA Pasco,WA Phone/Fax (509)965-7100/(5091972-0167 (509)_965-7I00/(509)972-0167 (509)545-6145/(509)542-0219 Email iyoungrr.,ccyakima.org dmorales@ccyakima.org lmathis@,ceyakima.org SUBMITTED BY: �&,, X 4".olden z• G�, l C�tQ DG/a'Yf� Sign e of Authorizedlcia Title DAte 2013 CDBG Application official Page 6 RECEIVED JUN 072012 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B LOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUNpN+TY& FGON01191C DFVEZppI41ENI AGENCY: Benton Franklin Community Action Committee PROJECT TITLE: Community Housing Improvement Program Minor Rehab/Repairs ADDRESS: 720 W. Court Street—Pasco,WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Multiple sites within the City of Pasco AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Judith A.Gidley,Executive Director E-MAIL: igidleya,bfcac.org PHONE: 509-545-4042 FAX: 509-544-9691 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 50,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 5,000 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): There is a gap in housing services to provide low or zero percent interest loans to homeowner for owner-occupied and rental properties for emergency/energy efficient repairs,lead-hazard reductions,and connections to city water.A minor rehabilitation/repair program is needed to assist with efforts to sustain and improve existing housing stock. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Provide funds for minor rehabilitations/repairs as required sustaining or improving existing housing stock occupied by households that are 80%or below area median income. Depending on income level Pasco citizens may receive a zero or low interest installment loan if they are not burdened with housing costs that exceed 30% of their income,a deferred loan if housing costs are greater than 30%of their income,and a grant if their income is lower than 50%u of median area income. The funds may be used to repair or replace failed HVAC units,roofs,and windows with energy efficient systems. Remove lead or asbestos hazards for a qualified rehabilitation project,hook-up to city sewer/water when it is available in the area and the existing system has failed or is failing and/or any other eligible minor rehabilitation activity for or qualified households. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Sustain or improve the quality of existing affordable housing stock. Strategy IV.2 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ❑A ❑B ZC DD and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: C1 -Bricks& Mortar Project resulting in preservation of affordable housing through rehabilitation or acquisition/rehabilitation(engineering&architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project cost 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: December 31,2013 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Construction hard costs, soft costs and project delivery, 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?0 YES ®NO 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 1 8. ELIGIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570,203: Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1)Z You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH) 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑Census Tract# 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ®Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? Combination of federal state local funds until program develops revolving loan program that is self-sustaining 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES N/A To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded, a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 12, WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOUR_CES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ $ $ 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 2 ! CENSUS BLOCK I) 77?ACT GROUP I j PEASOMS 201 ALL 74.6 N 200 69 IJ 'f f/ lJ OJT 202 ALL 75.0 ,., , 100 86.1 200 583 23 ALL 628 '�'.' �'' T zw 76.9 200 124 300 75.0 204 ALL 69.8 100 823 200 525 300 8&4 400 M0 If/! / r z. ;1Z A 11 Igm WE ii'i %/%/i%/7lrri4�l -'o /// % t% �//iii/fir/i✓i/ice A r �s/v'Y'�r fj'A+'� riI/� A//✓,�7I/.' +ii o IMF/ r��/ �..'� � !` / �1f �I/ r 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance pro ess if any) 1St Quarter Perform tier Environmental Review 2" Quarter Marketing and identify project site 3r Quarter Perform Sitespecific environmental review 4 Quarter Completion 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 55,000.00 $5,000.00 Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Project Delivery $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Soft Costs $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Materials Labor/Contracts $40,000.00 $40,000.00 PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $55,000.00 $50,000.00 $5,000.00 $00.00 Additional explanation of the above budget: Minimum two units at$22,250 for minor rehabilitation construction, soft costs and project delivery up to a maximum of 5 units provided$10,000 for energy efficient system repairs or replacement. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned, will fewer persons be served, etc.? If fewer funds are received the fewer households will be assisted. 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-Estimate the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ❑Person,or by®Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 2 Number of clients below 50%median 2 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 4 Number of clients below 80%median 1 Number of elderly clients 1 Number of minority clients 2 Total Number of Pasco residents served 5 Households (Should=total #above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Estimated 2012 HUD income Limit uidelines for ennewick—Pasco—Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 Peo le 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53 500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82900 88 200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jabs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be N/A created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Judith A. Gidley,Executive Director Judith A. Gidley,Executive Director Dave Odom,WX Director Mailing Address 720 W. Court Street 720 W. Court Street 720 W. Court Street City/State Pasco, WA 99301 Pasco,WA 99301 Pasco, WA 99301 Phone/Fax 509-545-4042 509-545-4042 509-545-4042 Email jgidley[a.bfcac.ora SUBMITTED BY: Judith A. Gidley, Executive Director June 6,2012 ature of Authorized Official Title Date 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 5 RECEIVED UM1611A 2012 f eor�r,�ur�iTr& Eeor�a�ra11e OE�dfl_d1Pr,aEr�r 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND AGENCY: City of Pasco-Community&Economic Development PROJECT TITLE: Code Enforcement Officer ADDRESS: 525 North 3rd Avenue,Pasco,WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Census tracts 201,202,203 and 204 CONTACT PERSON: Mitch Nickolds,Inspection Services Manager E-MAIL: nickoldsm @ pasco-wa.gov PHONE: 509-545-3441 Ext.6311 FAX: 509-545-3499 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 48000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ 147000 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Blight conditions,property nuisances and fire hazards in homes and upon properties owned and/or occupied by low to moderate income families and lack of education of minimum housing and property maintenance standards for low to moderate income Y households.Property and housing conditions in older neighborhoods will continue to decline without constant code enforcement and education efforts. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Mitigation of blighted/substandard housing conditions, property nuisances and fire hazards and property maintenance and blight elimination education of residents of low to moderate income areas. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal Improve affordable housing opportunities for lower-income individuals and households. Strategy IV.2 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: 0A ®B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: BI 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: January 1 2012 through January 31,2012 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Paying a portion of the salary and benefits for a code enforcement officer. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑YES ®NO 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 1 S. ELIGIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals& Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: Z Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)Z Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract#201.202 203 and 204 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers a At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMi) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area (Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ---Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ®No Year program began? 1997 If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014?City of Pasco general funds and CDBG grant. 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of service that is currently CDBG-funded, a new service, or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG funded. Explain how your application qualifies: Z Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal?None. 2013 CDBG Application-Mcrge Page 2 . . I , r , j CENSUS %LOWIMODERATE Lrp L?VCOME PERSONS 201 ALL 74.6 ,t rr 68.8 rr rr fr rr t rr 600 77.8 202 ALL 75.0 .rr/I+ � + ol 100 r r t!0 300 78.9 Mpjr..' 203 ALL 628 rr 300 75.0 v 9 400 460 o 204 ALL 69.8 ZZ 200 52-5 10, , �• 100 82-3 0, 300 / , / ! // 400 M0 �� r ref �%hr ✓ / .s i.500 528 600 564 ol Vol vvo t� /,.II /rrr.%/I:I'� �r�.l�/ / rrr/r ell �� •/r/r�I/r�/' f ��� / / K• %I r 00, 1 flj % /.Il '/ r F///, r f'o r r/0/5 r/ i I f r r/ r r/r//i r rI I� .�rt Ii•1` I f % ' fj fi +' ♦I�1 �..it/ /� +/ � , //r/%/'✓/. �//aiI/. !/,r •/r/s. /. ''r /.rr �/i a I+j/r �� + +f!�110•�rr, /lam let i •r/,�/� !r/J �7Qr�,,♦ s>i/,l/} ./II.��//•./�./fry//r "'oo/ mm'g /�� ` • . _rrI`�ter• //�`// ♦�%/ir%/ ��//.+`•«.rte/ F, Z'002 � r OF 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if an 1S`Quarter 125 Houses/properties served 2°°Quarter 125 Houses/properties served 3`d Quarter 125 Houses/properties served 4`h Quarter 125 Houses/properties served TOTAL 500 Homes/properties served 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies, office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: 65,025 48,000 17,025 Local Salaries Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $ 65,025 $48,000 '$17,025 I.octal Additional explanation of the above budget:Yes.The other funds will be uaid from the City's general fund. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? Nuisance conditions in census tract properties occupied by low-to-]moderate income families will remain unabated and the neighborhoods will continue to deteriorate and fewer persons will be served. 2013CDBC3 Application r Merge Page 4 PROJECT BENEFICIARIES -List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by:NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑Increase in Service 16. Person,or by❑Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%4 median 24,444 Number of clients below 50%median 7,034 Number of clients below 80%median 10,024 Number of elderly clients 1,998 Number of minority clients 16,731 Total Number of Pasco residents served 24,444 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? 2010 Census 2010 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland i Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30%q $13,650 $15,600 $17,550 $19,500 $21,060 $22,620 $24,180 $25,740 50%u $22,750 $26,000 $29,250 $32,500 $35,100 $37,700 $40,300 $42,900 80% $36,400 $41600 $46,800 $52,000 $56,200 $60,350 $64,500 $68,650 Median 545,500 $52,000 $58,500 $65,000 $70,200 $75,400 $80,600 $85,800 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income. persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Mitch Nickolds/Inspection Services Manager Mailing Address City of Pasco Inspection Services Division,PO Box 293 Pasco,WA 99301 City/State Pasco,Washington Phone/Fax 509 545-3441 Ext 6311/(509) 545-3499 Email NickoldsM as asco-wa. ov 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 5 Si,nature of Authorized Official Title Date 2013 CDBG Application-Merge Page 6 2 093 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND RECEIVED AGENCY; Regional Service Corps AmeriCorps .SUN 0 12012 PROJECT TITLE: Kurtzman Park Splash Pad comhltt o - - �„��017N 1,1IC OFVELOPf,7EPJ'r ADDRESS: 1215 West Lewis Street Pasco, WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Wehe and Alton Streets,Pasco,WA 99301 AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Erik Ramey,Program Assistant E-MAIL: a rsca.us PHONE: 509-546-0180 FAX: 866-701-0177 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 101.504.18 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 0 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED (AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Replace inoperable wading pool in Kurtzman Park with a new Splash Pad.This relates directly to Goal 3: Improve Public Facilities, Strategy 2 Improve Parks and Recreation Facilities in targeted neighborhoods,Objective 2.1 Support a range of improvements to existing or new parks, such as building bike and walking paths,constructing water features,or swimming pools, improving public restrooms, landscaping,or installing play equipment in lower income neighborhoods. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL- Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: We propose to install a Splash Pad at Kurtzman Park in the location of the inoperable wading pool.The new Splash Pad area would also include three new park benches,new sidewalk arm and connecting paths to the existing sidewalk and bathrooms.The assembly of the Splash Pad elements and other risk-and skill-appropriate tasks will be completed by Re ig Dual Service Corps-Am eriCorps members and community volunteers. Specialized labor,such as electrical and In umbing work,will be completed by qualified contractors and community volunteers.The concrete work will be completed by a local contractor. The population that would be served by this project is Census Tract#201.This census tract is 74.8%low to moderate income and 69.1%of households have individuals under 18 years of age. The AmeriCorps members surveyed both the children and adults of the Kurtzman Park area. All surveys were distributed in both English and Spanish,due to this census tract being 87.7%Hispanic or Latino. _ The children's survey was given to one class from each grade at the three schools closest to Kurtzman Park and also to children at the Martin Luther King Center.We surveyed a total of 312 children.An overwhelming percent(93.9%)said they would visit the Splash Pad—only nineteen children said they would not visit. The adults' survey was conducted through a neighborhood canvass by AmeriCorps bi-lingual teams.Ninety-six adults stated they would visit the nark more often if there were a Splash Pad.Adults were asked what they could contribute to the construction of the Splash Pad. Eighty-five percent of those adults surveyed indicated they would be willing to attend a meeting at the Martin Luther King Center to help with the planning,56 would be willing to help with physical labor,25 would be willing to prepare and serve food for the volunteers and 15 would be willing to contribute materials or cash.Additionally, eighteen individuals indicated that they had specialized experience in construction,plumbing,or electrical work that they would contribute to the project. While conducting the surveys AmeriCorps members were able to collect overwhelming anecdotal evidence that the community was not only interested,but excited about the prospect of a Splash Pad in their neighborhood.A number of the adults stated that there were not enough activities available for children in the neighborhood and several of the families were driving to the Kennewick Aquatic Splash Pad near the Playground of Dreams.They were eager to have the closer option. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s) listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal 3 Improve Public Facilities, Strategy 2 Improve Parks and Recreation Facilities in targeted neighborhoods,Objective 2.1 Support a range of improvements to existing or new parks such as building bike and walking paths,constructing water features nr c xi;mmi nl nt nnc ;mnrnvinu ic rectrnnrnc_ lanrlcc anina_ nr installing nlav eguinment in Inver inrnme nei�hhnrhnnrlc_ 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: NA ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: This is a brick and mortar project that would result in visual and physical improvement— specifically in an improvement to a public faciliIX that is no loniger being utilized. The inoperable wading pool will be replaced with a Splash Pad, 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: 4 months 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Splash Pad in public park 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑ YES Z NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): Public Facilities(,new construction or capital improvements) 24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(,0)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.265: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)0 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ED Census Tract#201 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons Abused children 0 Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)0 Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum& Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded, a new service, or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: Ll Continuation of Services 0 New Service ❑ Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $0 $0 — $0 Richland $0 $0 — so Kennewick $0 $0 $ 0 Other Federal Source(s) $0 $0 $ 0 To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? None 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: 'f WNR J J r '!'*\ t , ,j/,1 t l/� f j ... on �' r�=r �•MAIN mmm mom Emm! 191 FIR won Nop WA VAF 'gr ��%%►' r' I F !' ,/� III Mgv r/lj /��' &4 ' 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an 6/12-8/12 Secure an ongoing steering committee of community volunteers, RSC-AC members and alum, Ci of Pasco representative(s), and community volunteers with special skills 09112-11112 Create plan for obtaining donations 01/13 Receive award letter 03/13 Secure donations for park benches and bricks for connecting side walks 3/1113-4/30/13 Put out RFP to local contractors 5/l/13-5,115/13 Contractor award notification and contract signing eriod 6/1/13-6/30/13 Order construction and Splash Pad materials 8/1/13-9/30/13 Secure donations of lunch for volunteers 9/I/13-9/30113 Hold community planning meeting at Martin Luther King Center 9/1113-9/30/13 Secure volunteers for construction 9/1113-9/30/13 Have construction materials and Splash Pad delivered 1011/13-10/31/13 Have plumbing and electrical work completed 10/1/13-10/31/13 Have concrete poured 10/1/13-10/31/13 Have benches and sidewalks installed 10/1/13-10/31/13 Have Splash Pad installed 5/14 Hold community Grand Opening CerernoLL and Volunteer Recognition 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries,. rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS S OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 0 0 Benefits 0 0 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease 0 0 Utilities 0 0 Supplies 0 0 CONSTRUCTION: Splash Pad $101,504.18 Elements: Architectural $70,719.90 Engineering Concrete,electrical, and plumbing: Materials $30,784.28 Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price 0 0 Closing cost 0 0 OTHER:(describe) 0 0 TOTAL $101,504.18 $101,504.18 $ S Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served, etc.? We would seek to have materials in the budget donated such as concrete). We would also have to reduce the number of Spray Activities included in the Splash Pad. 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: Person,or by[]Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median Number of clients below 50%median Number of clients below 80%median Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Total Number of Pasco residents served 9,654(74.8% low to moderate (Should=total#above) income) What is the data source for the information provided above? US Census Bureau 2012 HUD income Limit guidelines for Kennewick—Pasco—Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 Peo le 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,400 $26,500 50% 523,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42.800 $48,150 $53.450 `657.750 $62,050 $667300 $70,600 Median $46.800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72.200 1 $77.500 $82900 ,$88,200 For Information Only,2013 Income Limits will af)ply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY- Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Erik Ramey Mailing Address 1215 West Lewis Street City/State Pasco,WA Phone/Fax 509-546-0180 Email paarscA i S SUBMITTED BY: 4ss4s �►t — 6�i� gr Signature of Authorie Official Title Date 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND AGENCY: City of Pasco—Administrative&Community Services BECEIVED PROJECT TITLE: Replace Kurtzman Pool with Spray Park ADDRESS: 525 N 3=d Ave Pasco WA 99301 1UIN 0 8 2012 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 321 S Wehe Ave AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Rick Terway,Director A&CS COWIMITY & ECONNI9 C DEVELOP[+1ENT E-MAIL: terwayr @pasco-wa.gov PHONE: 509-543-5757 FAX: 509-543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 200,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ $50,000 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Replace pool in Kurtzman Park with a new splash pad.Goal 3:Improve Public Facilities. Strategy 2: Improve parks and Rec Facilities. Obj 2.1: Improve existing parks 2, EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Replace pool with splash pad 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal 3:Improve Public Facilities. Strategy 2: Improve parks and Rec Facilities. Obj 11: Improve existing parks 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: BSI A ❑B 7 C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: This is a brick and motar project that would result in visual and physical improvements to a public facility that is no longer being utilized.The pool will be replaced with a splash pad. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: June—October 2013 6, SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Splash pad in public park 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ZNO 8. ELIBIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): 2013 Kurtzman CDBG App.doex Page 1 Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570_.202: El Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planninr,24 CFR 570.205: Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting Iow and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1) ❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2) 0 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone F>� Census Tract# 201 3) ❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box) (LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4) ❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5) ❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? 11, PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded, Explain how your application qualifies: ❑Continuation of Services ❑ New Service ❑ Increase in Service 12. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ $ $ Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ 2013 Kurtzman CDBG App.doex Page 2 To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? none 2013 Kurtzman CDBG App.docx Page 3 � 1 1 • I � 'f f kk� \\ / 1i!% ''` ! IS mpg PAR MEMI Is :■:■ !:1!"x:11 I .• f Own WE own IN mom fir, Arm IN mW WE mirmA MAN Will WIN man 11,10 iON3f /f ��,/�iii�� t!!/�>�//Ij1��`'''�•� jN IV KNOR SO Wd • I I 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an Feb 2013 Plans March 2013 Bids June 2013 Construction Begin Se t 2013 Construction Complete 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: 250,000 200,000 50,000 Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) M&O,Acct,Insurance TOTAL $250,000 5200,000 $50,000 S Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested fiends or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned, will fewer persons be served,etc.? 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: M Person,or by 0 Household(family)? 2013 Kurtzman CDBG A.pphocx Page 5 Number of clients below 30%median Number of clients below 50%median Number of clients below 80%median Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Total Number of Pasco residents served 9654 (74.8%low to moderate (Should=total#above) income) What is the data source for the information provided above? US Census Bureau 2012 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick—Pasco—Richland I Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $2.1,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26500 50% $23,400 $26750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46800 S53)500 $60,200 $661800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply, 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Mailing Address City/State Phone/Fax Email SUBMITTED BY: X 5"-r Director,Administrative&Comm Svcs 6/11/12 Signature of Authoriz fficial Title Date 2013 Kurtzman CDBG App.docx Page 6 1. • ' 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) FUND AGENCY: City of Pasco PROJECT TITLE: ADA Improvements RECEIVED ADDRESS: 525 N. 3rd Avenue,Pasco,WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Various Locations AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Ahmad Qayoumi COM611INIIY P, ECQNIJL nrilri OP14 :N1 E-MAIL: gayoumia&asco-wa.gov PHONE: 509-545-3446 FAX: 509-543-5737 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 250,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH:$ 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Under Title 11,ADA facilities in the public right-of-way are considered a program and are required to meet ADA standards. Based on current inventory,the City of Pasco does not currently meet ADA standards on a number of the City's ramps. The City would like to perform construction of ADA Ramps that meet current standards as part of the Transition Plan. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Continuation of sidewalk inventory,ADA inventory,Transition plan and final implementation into our current resurfacing and /or overlay program. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal II Strategy 2--City of Pasco will improve access for persons with disabilities by improving streets and sidewalk systems. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ZA '❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Will improve public facilities within public right-of-way to meet current ADA standards. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: continuous 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: ADA Improvements 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ® NO 8. ELIGIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): Z Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): 50 ramps to be completed ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): 2013 CDBG Application DRAFT ARP Page 1 ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570,202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other describe): NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)Z Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone 0 Census Tracts 201, 202,203 and 204 eg.. 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): (Census Tracts 205&206) ❑Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Disabled persons ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 9. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes [DNo Year program began?2012 If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? Overl4y and local funds 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded, a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ]] Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 11, WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ 568,240 $ $340,000 $ Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? 2013 CDBG Application DRAFT ARP Page 2 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: 2013 CDSG Application DRAFT ARP Page 3 CDBG ADA IMPROVEMENTS �-- ----- t 1 CITYLIMITS 1 34 1 rrr , IMPROVEMENT AREA 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if an 312013— 1112013 Complete construction of identified ADA ramps 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies, office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries General Funds/ Other Benefits $5,000 $3,500 $1,500 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering $35,000 525,000 $10,000 General Funds/ Other Materials Labor/Contracts $221,500 $221,500 PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $261,500 $250,000 $11,500 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? There is a fixed cost on each ramp. When less funds are received there will be less ramps constructed and less accessibility for the ADA.community. ($5,000 per ramp,30 ramps to be completed 2013 CDBG Application DRAFT ARP Page 4 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ®Person,or by[]Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 1200 Number of clients below 50%median 400 Number of clients below 80%median 100 Number of elderly clients high Number of minority clients high Total Number of Pasco residents served high (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? estimates 2012 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick-Pasco--Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48,150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jabs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 17, CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Ahmad Qavoumi Mailin#;Address 525 N.3`d Ave City/State Pasco, WA Phone/Fax 509-545-3446 Email gavoumia ,pasco-wa gov SUBMITTED BY: A? A Signature o Authori ed OfficiA Title Dat 2013 CDBG Application DRAFT ARP Page 5 RECEIVED JUN 0 6 2012 2013 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) FU04t'1UNITY& ECOWOr,IiC 0EVEtoPr,]ENT AGENCY: Boys&Girls Clubs of Benton&Franklin Counties PROJECT TITLE: _Learning Center and Office Renovation&ADA Accessibility ADDRESS: 801 N. 18`t'Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 801 N. 18th Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301 AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL Brian Ace, President&Katie Johnson, Vice President of Finance E-MAIL: brian.ace{akidexpert.orw&katie@kidexpert.org PHONE: 509-543-9980 FAX: 509-543-9981 AMOUNT"OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 155,800 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ 10,800 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): The city-owned building serves youth in the local community so that parents of low-income families can work and the youth can learn valuable skills.The Learning Center is a place where youth can get assistance with homework and participate in other activities.Consistent with Goal Ill,Strategy 1,Objective 1.1, we are asking for improvements to the learning Center and office spaces of a public facility to better serve lower-income families in the local neighborhood. In addition,the improvements will vastly increase the ADA accessibility to the building and program spaces,consistent with Goal 11,Strategy 2,Objective 2.1 and make program spaces safer for youth and all individuals in the building. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: The youth served in our programs are predominantly form low-income households and would otherwise be unsupervised during program hours,addresses Goal IV,Strategy 2,Objective 11,since 86.3%and 32.2%of youth at the two schools closest to our building are receiving free or reduced lunches. We are proposing to make changes to the Learning Center and office spaces to improve efficiency and space in the utilization of those rooms,encapsulate potential lead based paint,remove asbestos based glue in the flooring in these spaces,and improve ADA accessibility to the building and these spaces. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the Tri-Cities 5-Year Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal III,Strategy 1,Objective 1.1 is for the improvement of neighborhood centers. The building improvements will enhance programs and the efficiency of providing services at a neighborhood center. We provide services to families in low-income neighborhoods,which meets Goal IV,Strategy 2,Objective 2.1. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section 11 in Allocation Policy): Priority:EA ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Alter public facility reduce barriers for physically impaired persons and to improve safety in offering programs to disadvantages youth. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: 3—6 months 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Improve ADA accessibility and building safety 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑YES 0 NO 8. ELIGIBILITY: How does your proposal meet Eligibility criteria of 24 CFR 570 below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.20110)/24 CFR 570.203: 2013 CDBG Application.docx Page 1 ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons below? (SELECT ONLY ONE) l)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2A Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone 0 Census Tract# 201.202, 203, 204 3)❑ Your project serves ONLY the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs for low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. LENGTH OF SERVICE Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ENo Year program began? 1994 If you receive funding for 2013,how will your program be funded in 2014? Our request is for capital improvements, it will not impact services provided in 2flI3 or 2014(we will continue to operate in both years). 11. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be continuation of a service that is currently CDBG-funded,a new service,or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service that is not currently CDBG-funded. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 12, WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING FROM ALL SOURCES HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2012 2011 2010 Pasco $ $ 10,906.07 $ Richland S $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Other Federal Source(s) $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? Other Funding has not been secured at this time,however,we intend to ask for donated services in the planning portion of the project,as well as with materials. 2013 CDBG Application.docx Page 2 13. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: z Cartlnnll S1 VY Brown St a D Vo Brcngn SI Brown St z g ep R t !� W Brown St Brawn St v z VV Marie St ° 'W Mane S1 � 2 O Fr1 Ctx�l7an VJai rs ro W 003 V S1 a W Octave S► chinch Past a4, Stale Pasco 1'rry Ir:Icf�led VV Henry S1 W Henry$I LI'J,w+•nry Sr W margarei S1 YV ^ rare c, %p W Pam St Edgar brown ,r t'nr,r.o<': { htemonal t-, tx'rr;t i4 W Parl Stadwm z W Nixon St 7 Tr.Ctlirs IfJ fi�xra � n � D, Pr ryfurticy ■ b t eb f/rtwrr4 m Vw W Sylvester S1 W Sylvester St 1i1 Sylvester SI nl�ttrri�.� a Re-tit A Car Q r W Irving St z tr'V Irving St VV rrvaig S � � z � a ri y ` ➢ 4V Yakmia Si ° A m W Y;14trnd 51 U4/Yakima _ s d o° cv N!Shoshone Sr W 5110-01 sru S. 02412 G84g1 w Map fta''V-012 Cr44gle 2013 CDBG Application.docx Page 3 14. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Dates or Date Range Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if any) 06/01/2013 Signed contracts with City of Pasco as sub-recipients. 06/15/2013—06/30/2013 Request for Proposal to contractors and contractor selection. 07/01/2013—07/15/2013 Signed contracts with contractors for construction work to be completed. 08/0112013 Final design and construction schematics,permit applications and necessary testing complete. 08/15/2013 Begin renovation and construction of interiors ace. 09/15/2013 Demolition and reconstruction of front entry wa for ADA accessibility improvements. 10/31/2013 Com letion of interior renovation. 11/15/2013 Completion of sidewalk additions and ADA ramp. 15. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies, office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LIME ITEM $ TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHERFUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries $8,300 $8,300 Boys&Girls Clubs Benefits $1,500 $1,500 Boys&Girls Clubs OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities $500 $500 Boys&Girls Clubs Supplies $500 $500 Boys&Girls Clubs CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials $60,900 $60,900 Labor/Contracts $91,400 $91,400 PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) Abatement Testing $2,000 $2,000 Permits $1,500 $1,500 Security System Relocation $1,000 $1,000 Boys&Girls Clubs TOTAL $167,600 $155,800 $11,800 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned, will fewer persons be served,etc.? If funds are not received,this City building will remain non-ADA compliant. 2013 CDBG Application.docx Page 4 16. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. is your count by: []Person,or by Household(family)? Number of clients below 30%median 478 Number of clients below 50%median 435 Number of clients below 80%median 132 Number of elderly clients 0 Number of minority clients 0 Total Number of Pasco residents served 1,045 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Vision Member Trackirtg System 2012 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick-Pasco-Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $14,050 $16,050 $18,050 $20,050 $21,700 $23,300 $24,900 $26,500 50% $23,400 $26,750 $30,100 $33,400 $36,100 $38,750 $41,450 $44,100 80% $37,450 $42,800 $48.150 $53,450 $57,750 $62,050 $66,300 $70,600 Median $46,800 $53,500 $60,200 $66,800 $72,200 $77,500 $82,900 $88,200 For Information Only, 2013 Income Limits will apply. 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons (Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year(Use EDA Classifications) 18. CONTACT INFORMATION Authorized Official Contract Administrator Project Manager Name/Title Brian Ace, President Katie Johnson,VP of Finance Mailing Address 801 N 18t`Avenue 801 N 18th Avenue City/State Pasco, WA 99301 Pasco,WA 99301 Phone/Fax (509)543-9980 x16 (509)543-9980 xI 1 Email brian.acc@kidexoert.org katie(a,kidexpert.org SUBMITTED BY: f � Vice President of Finance June 6,2012 Signature of Auth ized Official Title Date 2013 CDBG Application,docx Page 5 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 13, 2013 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator 620 SUBJECT: 2013 HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL WORK PLAN (MF# BGAP2012-004) Background Pasco entered into a HOME Consortium Agreement with Richland and Kennewick in 1996 making the City eligible for Federal HOME funds. In May 2010, this Agreement was renewed through 2013. Each November an annual action plan is required to be prepared and submitted to HUD for use of estimated funds for the following program year. Estimated Funds Available It is estimated that the 2013 annual entitlement grant to the HOME Consortium will be $451,060, based on the award for program year 2012. Each member city is allocated a share of the entitlement utilizing the same formula used to allocate the CDBG entitlement grants. Pasco's share of the entitlement is estimated to be $149,723 based in 2012 allocations, and program income totaling$131,000 is expected from acquisition/rehab projects making a total of$280,723 available for Pasco HOME projects in program year 2013. There is always some question regarding actual funding levels approved by Congress. Actual available funding for these FY 2013 activities will remain in question until the early part of the year when the HOME allocation is made by Congressional Resolution. if funding levels are lower than estimated, activity funding may need to be reallocated accordingly. Planninp- & Administration HUD regulations state that the amount of HOME Funds obligated within a program year to support planning and administration activities may not exceed 10% of the entitlement. This is awarded to Richland annually as the Lead Agency of the HOME Consortium to manage all activities. Member cities are provided funds for planning and administration from 10%of program income received from completed projects within their jurisdiction. For 2013,program income estimated at $131,000 will make available $13,100 for administration. CHDO Set-Aside Each year 15% of the entitlement grant must be set-aside to help Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDO) add to the permanent affordable housing stock. The member cities receive these funds every third year. Earlier this year, Council approved a project proposed by Benton Franklin Community Action Committee to use Pasco's 2011 CHDO funds to purchase a four-plea for permanent transition housing. This project has been delayed due to HUD rules that prevent Housing Authority participation in HOME-funded projects, but CAC is moving forward with the project and will undertake associated management responsibilities. Although member cities must provide the minimum 15% set-aside for CHDO projects, more HOME funds may be provided if necessary. Current Balances Pasco's HOME budgeted funds as of June 30, 2012 through Program Year 2012 is $652,502. The budget amount is approved by Council Resolution each year and includes HOME entitlement funds and estimated program income anticipated from acquisition/infill projects. Proposed units of housing that remain to be completed through program year 2012 with these restricted funds total 36. Any change to the budgeted amounts below that exceed 10% of the entitlement or changes the scope of the activity requires preparation of substantial amendment to the annual action plan in compliance with the Citizen Participation Plan. Contracted/ Reserved/ Units Budgeted Obligated Application ;Pending Acquisition &Rehab/Infill Projects $ 17,64$ $ - - CHDO Set-Aside Acquisition $ 90,294 $ 90,294 $ - 4 First Time Homebuyer Assistance $ 104,000 $ 104,000 20 Owner-occupied Rehabilitation $ 347,800 $ 80,500 $ 267,300 10 Rental Rehabilitation $ 92,760 $ - $ 92,760 2 Administration from PI $ - $ - $ - - $ 634,854 $ 188,442 $ 464,060 36 Proposed Activities HOME funds are based on need and income eligibility and may be used anywhere within the city limits, however, neighborhoods designated as priority by Pasco City Council receive first consideration. Funding is first targeted in the Longfellow and Museum neighborhoods, then within low-moderate income census tracts (201, 202, 203 and 204). If HOME funds cannot be applied to those areas, then they are used as needed within the Pasco City limits for the benefit of eligible low-moderate income families. The City is able to use HOME funds for acquisition and rehabilitation of vacant/foreclosed properties, or developing vacant property through "infill" new construction projects. Program income anticipated from the resale of prior year construction projects in addition to outstanding balances will continue to fund program activities through 2013. Staff recommends that anticipated 2013 HOME entitlement funds and program income is allocated to the proposed activities per annual work plan below: Proposed Activities Budget Units Acquisition& Rehab/Infill Projects $ 141,917 1 CHDO Acquisition (in addition to 2011 CHDO Set-aside) $ 69,706 First Time Homebuyer Assistance $ 56,000 10 Administration from PI $ 13,100 $ 280,723 11 The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. /arp Attachments: 1. 2013 HOME Fund Summary--June 21, 2012 Attachment 1 - 2013 HOME Fund Summary - 06.21-12 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 Proposals-Recommendations Agency Staff PC ID Resolution ACTIVITY/AGENCY NAME Requested Recommend Recommend Amended 19 PY2013 CHDO $ 69,706.00 $ 69,706 2.0 PY2013 DPA $ 56,000.00 $ 56,000 21 PY2013 INFILL, ACQUISITION $ 141,917.00 $ 141,917 22 PY2013 ADMIN $ 13,100.00 $ 13,100 $ 280,723 PY2013 EN ESTIMATED $ 149,723.00 PY2013 PI ESTIMATED $ 131,000.00 $ 280,723.00 RECOMMENDED $ 280,723.00 SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $ - 6/1412012 Attachment 1-2013 HOME Fund Summary-06.21-12 RESOLUTION ALLOCATIONS Units Resolution# Activity Description Allocated Proposed Actual Remaining Bal Remaining PY2011 Res#3276 ADM I N $ 26,000.00 - PY2012 Res#3335 ADMIN $ 30,000.00 - ADMIN Total $ 56,000.00 - 0 - $ - PY2008 CHDO CHDO $ 92,253.00 7 7 - PY2011 Res#3383 CHDO $ 90,294.00 4 4 $ 90,294.00 PY2013 CH DO $ 109,706.00 CHDO Total $ 182,547.00 11 7 4 $ 90,294.00 PY2006 Res#2911 DPA $ 50,000.00 10 10 - PY2008 ADDI DPA $ 5,220.00 1 1 - PY2009 Res#3101 DPA $ 10,000.00 2 2 - PY2010 Res#3188 DPA $ 82,308.47 12 12 - PY2011 Res#3276 DPA $ 60,000.00 15 7 8 $ 32,000.00 PY2012 Res#3335 DPA $ 72,000.00 12 12 $ 72,000.00 PY2013 DPA $ 56,000.00 10 10 $ 56,000.00 DPA Total $ 335,528.47 62 32 20 $ 104,000.00 PY2006 Res#2912 INFILL,ACQUISITION $ 50,000.00 2 2 - $ - PY2010 Res#3188 INFILL, ACQUISITION $ 308,547.60 3 3 - $ - PY2011 Res#3276 INFILL,ACQUISITION $ 275,000.00 3 3 - PY2012 Res#3335 INFILL,ACQUISITION $ 347,723.00 3 1 2 $ 231,815.33 PY2013 INFILL,ACQUISITION $ 115,017.00 1 1 $ 115,017.00 INFILL,ACQUISITION Total $ 1,096,287.60 12 9 2 $ 231,815.33 PY2006 Res#2911 REHAB $ 159,876.00 6 6 - $ - PY2007 Res#2981 REHAB $ 198,304.00 8 8 - $ - PY2008 Res#3041 REHAB $ 198,304.00 8 8 - $ - PY2009 Res#3101 REHAB $ 183,224.00 7 7 $ 183,224.00 PY2011 Res#3276 REHAB $ 115,000.00 3 3 $ 115,000.00 REHAB Total $ 854,708.00 32 22 10 $ 298,224.00 PY2010 Res#3188 RENTAL REHAB $ 92,760.00 2 2 $ 92,760.00 RENTAL REHAB Total $ 92,760.00 2 0 2 $ 92,760.00 ALLOCATIONS Grand Total $ 2,727,537.07 119 70 49 $ 988,110.33 Z\08.0 Proposals&Projects\0 GRANT ADMINISTRATION HOME\BGAP 2012-004 HOME ALLOCATION PY 2013\Attachment 1-2013 HOME Fund Summary-06.21-12 MEMORANDUM DATE: .tune 13, 2013 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Black Grant Administrator SUBJECT: 2013 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM (NSP) ALLOCATION AND ANNUAL WORK PLAN (MF# BGAP2012-005) Backeround On March 15, 2010 Council approved Resolution No. 3220 amending NSP Allocation and Work Plan to increase total funding to a total of $426,343 and adding acquisition and rehabilitation activities to the down payment assistance activity for foreclosed properties. The City utilized NSP funds to provide down payment assistance to 8 buyers of foreclosed homes and purchase 3 foreclosed homes which were rehabilitated with HOME NSP Program Income from the acquisition/rehabilitation and sale of three foreclosed properties acquired in 2010 was estimated to be $357,000. The NSP acquisitions were rehabilitated using HOME funds instead of NSP funds. NSP's pro-rata share of the program income is estimated to be half the original estimate ($178,500), triggering an amendment to the allocations and annual work plan for 2012. Estimated Funds Available Program income from one acquisition/rehab sale estimated to be $80,000 is anticipated to available for 2013 projects. If funding levels are lower than anticipated, activity funding may need to be reallocated accordingly. Planning & Administration For 2013,program income estimated at$80,000 will make available$8,000 for administration. Current Balances Pasco's NSP unexpended funds as of June 30, 2012 through Program Year 2012 is $112,000. The budget amount is approved by Council Resolution each year for following program year activities. Proposed Activities The City is able to use NSP funds for down payment assistance, acquisition and rehabilitation of foreclosed properties. Expected program income from the sale of one rehabilitated foreclosure will to continue this program in 2013. Staff proposes the following allocations and amendments to the annual work plan for 2012 and 2013. PY 2013 Proposed Activities Budget Units 2013 First Time Homebuyer Assistance $ 72,000.00 7 2013 Administration from PI $ 8,000.00 $ 80,000.00 7 AMENDED 2012 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 2012 Acquisition& Rehabilitation Projects $ 135,425.00 1 2012 First Time Homebuyer Assistance $ 38,500.00 4 2012 Administration from PI $ 4,575.00 $ 178,500.00 5 The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. larp MEMORANDUM DATE: June 13, 2012 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator SUBJECT: 2012 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM REALLOCATION (MF#BGAP2012-006) Proposed Reallocation Attached for your review and consideration is the revised 2012 CDBG Fund Summary for proposed significant amendment to the 2012 CDBG Annual Action Plan. In accordance with the Citizen Participation Plan changes in funding greater than 10% of the annual entitlement, changes scope, purpose or beneficiaries requires a significant amendment to the plan. Reallocation of Funds On September 6, 2011 Council passed Resolution 3339 approving 2012 CDBG Program Year grant allocations and annual work plan. December 19, 2011 Council approved amendment to the Annual Action plan in Resolution 3364 cancelling Eastside Community Park and Reallocating funds to Kurtzman LID #149 construction and ADA ramp retrofit projects. Chanp_es to Scope, Purpose & Beneficiaries A change in community needs prescribes a change to the annual action plan to reallocate $30,000 from the ADA Ramp Retrofit project to the 4a' Avenue Corridor Improvement Project for placement of a decorative wall/fence along residential property fronting 0'Avenue. Due to the close proximity to the roadway and high level of noise, the City recommended placement of a barrier in the public right-of-way at this location to protect residents from traffic and noise. The property owner adjacent to the project complained that the barrier blocked them in. Therefore, in an effort to deter some of the impacts of traffic in a pleasing and aesthetic way, a decorative fence constructed of masonry pillars and wrought-iron panels was designed. Increase/ Revised Activity Decrease Budget ADA Ramp Retrofitting ($30,000.00) $188,240.00 4th Avenue Corridor Improvement Project $30,000.00 $30,000.00 Recommendation After discussions and staff evaluation, it is recommended that the activities set forth in Attachment 1 would best meet the City's Consolidated Plan and be most effective in carrying out the objectives for the City in 2012. Your review and consideration for recommendation to the City Council would be appreciated. Therefore, we propose the following Motion: MOTION: I move the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the use of funds for the 2012 Community Development Block Grant Program as set forth in the Attachment 1 "2012.2 Fund Summary" as amended by Staff. The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. larp Attachments: 1. 2012.2 CDBG Fund Summary—Amended June 21, 2012 Attachment 1 2012.2 CDBG Fund Summary - PC 06.21.12 Amended Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 Proposals-Recommendations ID Recipients ACTIVITY 1 AGENCY NAME CITY COUNCIL BUDGET AMENDED APPROVAL City of Pasco-Community $104,00000 $104,000.0 1 & Economic Development CDBG Program Administration City of Pasco- Administrative& Civic Center-Youth Recreation $20,000.00 $20,000.00 2 Icommunity Services Specialist City of Pasco- Administrative& Martin Luther King Community $20,000.00 $20,000.00 3 Community Services Center Recreation Specialist City of Pasco- Administrative& Senior Citizen's Center $30,000.00 $30,000.00 4 lCommunity Services Recreation Specialist HomeworkZone-After School 7 PowerZone Youth Center Tutoring/Mentoring Program City of Pasco-Community Pasco Downtown Development $50,000.00 $50,000.110 8 1& Economic Development Commercial Kitchen City of Pasco-Community Downtown Fagade Improvement $60,000.00 $60,000.00 9 & Economic Development (2 fa(;ades) City of Pasco- Administrative& LID 148 Special Assessment $65,000.00 $65,000.00 10 lCommunity Services Assistance Volunteer Chore Services(12 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 11 Catholic Family Charities households) City of Pasco- Administrative& $0.00 $0.00 12 lCommunity Services Eastside Community Park City of Pasco-Community $48,000.00 $48,000.00 14 & Economic Development Code Enforcement Officer Kurtzman Park Neighborhood City of Pasco-Public Improvements-Phase IV $350,000.00 $350,000.00 15 Works (CT201 BG2) City of Pasco-Public ADA Accessibility-Handicap $218,240.00 $218,240.00 $188,240.00 16 Works Ramp Retrofit City of Pasco-Public $30,000.00 17 Works 4th Avenue FencefWall $969,240.001 $969,240.00 Entitlement(2012 Estimated) Program Income (2012 Estimated) Prior Year Reallocations(2008-2010) Total 'Funds Available Proposals Recommended SURPLUS/DEFICIT 6/1 4/20'12 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 21, 2012 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey B. Adams SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT - SECONDHAND DEALERS IN C-1 and C-2 ZONES (MF# CA 2012-003) This memo is in response to a request by Goodwill Industries to locate a secondhand (thrift) shop in a C-1 Zone, which is prohibited by current zoning code. The request is to explore the advisability of altering the code to allow secondhand stores in C-1 Zones, in terms of expected positive and negative outcomes for public health, safety, and welfare. In 1989 there were 10 secondhand stores located within two blocks of the City's Central Business District; Goodwill, the Salvation Army, St. Vincent de Paul, two pawnshops, four used TV shops and one used book store. Additionally, it was noted that the area between First Avenue and 14th Avenue of West Lewis Street contained a disproportionately high number of secondhand stores in comparison with other commercially zoned areas within the city. A survey of these businesses conducted in 1989 revealed that the majority of these establishments were maintained in such a haphazard manner as to create visual blight for the area in which they were located. The buildings in question also exhibited signs of physical decay and varying degrees of deferred maintenance, perpetuating a negative public image for the community and presumably discouraging business investment within these areas. On the 20th of February 1990 the City Council passed ordinance 2768 prohibiting secondhand dealers from operating in the C-1 (Retail Business), C- 2 (Central Business District), and C-1-D (Designated Shopping Center) zones (C-1-D Zone now eliminated from the zoning code), as well as restricting placement of these and similar uses in the C-3 (General Business District) and I-1 (Light Industrial) zones to no less than 1,000 feet from each other. The reasoning cited in the ordinance is as follows: 1) The concentration of secondhand stores along with the manner in which they are maintained contributes to visual blight, physical decay, declining property values and perpetuates a negative public image for the community in general; 2) The external effects of physical decay and blight make the Central Business District and certain portions of Lewis Street less desirable for business investment: 3) Secondhand dealers, specifically pawnshops, require considerable regulation to protect the community and public interest by preventing said establishments from becoming facilities for the concealment of crime and outlets for stolen goods: 4) The enforcement of municipal codes relative to the operation of secondhand dealers is time consuming, burdensome, and costly to the community; The purpose of this project is to analyze the Goodwill Industries request in light of the above criteria and any other likely concerns related to secondhand businesses in general. It may be helpful to conceptually separate and define three categories of secondhand stores, as follows: 1) Pawnshops; 2) Consignment stores; and 3) Thrift Shop (Donation-based). Pawnshop: "A . . . business that offers secured loans to people, with items of personal property used as collateral." (Wikipedia.org) Consignment store: "A retail store that sells secondhand items on behalf of others and receives a percentage of the sales price." (Dictionary.com) Thrift Shop: "[Thrift] shops are a type of social enterprise . . . [which] usually sells mainly used goods donated by members of the public . . . ." (Wikipedia.org) Title 18 of the City of Kennewick Municipal Code and Section 23.06 of the Richland Municipal both define pawn shops as follows: "Pawn shop" means an establishment engaged in the buying or selling of new or secondhand merchandise and offering loans in exchange for personal property. Kennewick treats pawn and secondhand uses identically, requiring each to report to the police daily on all transactions. Excluded are stores which deal exclusively with "postage stamps, coins that are legal tender, bullion in the form of fabricated hallmarked bars, used books, and clothing of a resale value of $75.00 or less, except furs." These items lie outside the definition of "Secondhand Property." Title 18 of the City of Kennewick Municipal Code defines secondhand/ consignment shops as follows: 18.09.1915: Second-Hand/Consignment Store: "Second Hand/ Consignment Store" means retail business which sells merchandise on a consignment basis or outright. While consignment is addressed, no mention is made of goods being used, thus virtually any retail outlet in the city could qualify as a secondhand/ consignment store. Section 23.06 of the Richland Municipal Code defines secondhand shops differently, as follows: 23.06.835 Secondhand/consignment store. "Secondhand/consignment store" means an establishment engaged in the retail sale of used clothing, sports equipment, appliances, and other merchandise. [Ord. 28-05 § 1.02]. Richland's code seeks to encompass the look and feel of a typical thrift shop, but excludes the "consignment" feature from their definition. Neither Kennewick nor Richland Code makes a distinction whether items sold are purchased or donated. It should be noted that donation-dependent thrift shops such as Goodwill Industries differ substantially from pawnshops and consignment-type secondhand stores in that there is no built-in incentive for patrons "fencing" stolen goods for cash, and thereby contributing to overall criminal activity in the community. As such, criminal-based policing would not likely be an issue, so much as nuisance-based code enforcement. This said, we need to evaluate this particular business model in light of the above criteria. First, do all secondhand stores contribute to visual blight, physical decay, declining property values and perpetuate a negative public image for the community in general? As Goodwill is a donation-dependent operation, people drop items off as a matter of course; these items ranging in value from "slightly used" to "junk." While secondhand stores often strive to control the flow of castoffs, "midnight drop-offs" are virtually inevitable, and result in visual blight. As well, revenues for secondhand businesses may not be adequate to fund periodic upgrades or repairs to facilities, resulting in physical decay. These two factors will likely contribute to a decline in the physical value of the subject property, and in turn pull down the value of surrounding properties. A critical mass of these factors will project a negative public image of local citizens not caring about their community. As an example, the long-term effects of these forces on the downtown area, the external effects of physical decay and blight, have in fact driven business investors out of the area, left many buildings vacant, and made the Central Business District (CBD) and certain portions of Lewis Street less desirable for business investment. This is what happened in the 1980s. With the eventual removal of secondhand stores from the CBD there has been some growth in business activity including major investments such as Rite-Aid and Fiesta Foods, as well as many smaller businesses, and vacancy rates have decreased overall. While pawnshops require considerable regulation to protect the community and public interest by preventing them from becoming facilities for the concealment of crime and outlets for stolen goods, consignment-based secondhand dealers have traditionally seen minimal levels of stolen goods. Donation-dependent facilities rarely have that problem, since goods are donated, not exchanged for profit. This virtually eliminates the incentive and thus the likelihood of criminal "fencing" of goods by store patrons. However the issues of building decay, visual blight, and negative public image remain, and enforcement of municipal codes relative to the operation of secondhand dealers is still going to be time consuming, burdensome, and costly to the community; the special conditions which would be required of a donation-dependent secondhand store could be burdensome to enforce. Finally, the applicant has suggested that in order to allow second hand stores and simultaneously maintain property in a way that supports the objectives of the City, square footage requirement of 18,000 to 20,000 square feet may be a consideration, as large scale operations generally have the resources and labor necessary to maintain the visual appearance and general upkeep of a facility. However, welcoming large-scale enterprises at the expense of smaller ones may have negative legal implications. If the objective is to maintain the visual aspects of a site, design and maintenance requirements can be imposed regardless of the scale of an enterprise; the business owner then deciding if their business model "pencils out" when incorporating required mitigation measures. Otherwise such a minimum square footage requirement might need to be applied to all businesses in a zone equally. In summary, while increased criminal activity is likely not a factor when dealing with donation-based secondhand stores, visual blight, physical decay, declining property values, and probable increased costs for code enforcement are issues for consideration. Findings of Fact 1) Ordinance 2768 was enacted on February 20, 1990 to combat degradation in the downtown areas of Pasco. 2) The C-1 and CBD Zoning Districts were experiencing blight, vacancy, and loss of property value at the time. 3) Vacancy rates in the Pasco CBD have decreased overall since the enactment of ordinance 2768. 4) Goodwill Industries has submitted a request for a code amendment to allow secondhand stores in C-1 Zones. 5) The Planning Commission considered the request at workshop meetings on April 19 and May 17, 2012. Recommendation MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact as contained in the June 21, 2012 staff memo on Secondhand Dealers in C-1 and C-2 Zones. MOTION: I move the Planning Commission recommend the City Council adopt the proposed Code Amendment regulating the location and operation of secondhand stores within the City. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ZONING AND AMENDING PMC TITLE 25 DEALING WITH SECONDHAND STORES IN C-1 AND CBD ZONING DISTRICTS. WHEREAS, cities have the responsibility to regulate and control the physical development within their borders and ensure that the public health, safety and welfare are maintained; and, WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has zoning regulations that encourage orderly growth and development of the city, and, WHEREAS, in the past, Pasco had accommodated many secondhand stores that were concentrated geographically in the Central Business District; and, WHEREAS, the concentration of secondhand stores along with the manner in which they were maintained contributed to visual blight, physical decay, declining property values and perpetuated a negative public image for the community in general and the Central Business District; and, WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to guide the location of such consignment stores and thrift shops, and, WHEREAS, secondhand stores may be able to operate in such a way as to minimize the possible effects of physical decay and blight, given specific mitigating measures; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations, and has determined that to further the purpose of the comprehensive planning and to maintain and protect the welfare of the community, it is necessary to amend PMC Title 25, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That a new PMC Section 25.12.157 hereby is enacted to read as follows: 25.12.157 CONSIGNMENT STORE. "Consignment store"means a retail establishment having up to but no more than 50% of its stock-in-trade in"secondhand personal property" as the term is defined in this chapter, offered for sale on behalf of others in return for a commission, typically a percentage of the sales price. Section 2. That Section 25.12.385 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 25.12.385 SECONDHAND DEALER. "Secondhand dealer"means an establishment having any portion of its stock-in-trade in "secondhand personal property" Page 1 of 3 as that term is defined in this chapter, exclusive of consignment stores and thrift shops as defined in sections 25.12.157 and 25.12.456 of this chapter. Section 3. That a new PMC Section 25.12.158 hereby is enacted to read as follows: 25.12.456 THRIFT SHOP. "Thrift shop"means a retail establishment having any portion of its stock-in-trade in"secondhand personal property" as the term is defined in this chapter,which has been donated by the public, and at least 80% of its total floor space devoted to retail sales. Section 4. That Section 25.70.130 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 25.70.130 PAWNSHOPS AND SECONDHAND SHOPS. Pawnshops and secondhand dealers as defined in Section 25.12.360 and 25.12.385, exclusive of consignment stores and thrift shops as defined in sections 25.12.157 and 25.12.456, are prohibited from operating in zones in the C-2 (Central Business District), the C-1 (Retail Business District), the BP (Business Park District) zene, "O" (Office District) zone, C-R (Regional Commercial) Zone and any residential zone. zoning district. Pawnshops and secondhand dealers are permitted to operate in the C-3 (General Business District) zone and the I-1 (Light Industrial District) zone provided however no new pawnshops and secondhand dealers licenses shall be issued to an establishment located closer than 1,000 feet from an existing pawnshop, consignment store, thrift store or secondhand dealer. All business activities of pawnshops and secondhand dealers located in the C-3 (General Business District) zone shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed structure. Section 5. That a new PMC Section 25.70.131 hereby is enacted to read as follows: 25.70.131 CONSIGNMENT STORES. (1) "Consignment stores" as the term is defined in this chapter, may operate in the C-1 (Retail Business District) and C-2 (Central Business District) Zones; however no new consignment store may locate closer than 1,000 feet from an existing onsignment store, thrift store, or pawn shop; and, (2) Consignment stores may operate in the C-3 (General Business District) and in the I-1 (Light Industrial District) Zones; and, (3) All business activities of consignment stores located in the C-1 (Retail Business District), C-2 (Central Business District), and C-3 (General Business District) Zones shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed structure; Section 6. That a new PMC Section 25.70.132 hereby is enacted to read as follows: 25.70.132 THRIFT SHOPS (1)"Thrift shops" as the term is defined in this chapter, may operate in the C-1 (Retail Business district) and C-2 (Central Business District) Zones upon issuance of a Special Permit, as per the requirements found in PMC 25.86; however no new thrift shop may locate closer than 1,000 feet from an existing consignment store, thrift store, or pawn shop; and, (2) Thrift shops may operate in the C-3 (General Business District) and in the I-1 (Light Industrial District) Zones; and, Page 2 of 3 (3) All business activities of thrift shops in the C-1 (Retail Business District), C-2 (Central Business District), and C-3 (General Business District) Zones shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed structure; Section 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, at its regular meeting of 2012. Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney Page 3 of 3 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 21, 2012 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey B. Adams SUBJECT: RIVERSHORE LINKAGES &AMENITIES PLAN (MF#PLAN 2012-003) The City Council recently approved the Tri-Cities Rivershore Enhancement Council (TREC) 2012 Tri-Cities Rivershore Master Plan, which was crafted for the purpose of encouraging the participating jurisdictions to "develop facilities and programming that face and embrace the river, rather than turning away from it." The ten overarching elements of the 2012 Tri-Cities Rivershore Master Plan are as follows: 1. Improve wayfinding and identity. 2. Integrate and interpret arts, culture, heritage and environmental features. 3. Create "place"through viewpoints, seating areas and user amenities. 4. Enhance water-oriented activities and recreation. 5. Increase birding and wildlife viewing opportunities. 6. Enhance linkages to and from the rivershore, across the river, and through historic downtowns, commerce, and cultural areas. 7. Enliven the rivershore through formal and informal programming. 8. Strengthen the connection with the Yakima Delta and the Yakima and Snake River systems. 9. Re-engage the riverfront through land use. 10. Implement priority rivershore enhancement projects. In response to this plan, staff has assembled a draft Linkages and Amenities Plan which builds on TREC Plan items specific to the City of Pasco. The City's Comprehensive Plan specifies a goal that "All residents of the city are afforded access to the Columbia River." This plan is designed to ensure "Pasco is oriented toward and connected with the River through parks, pathways, bikeways, boat launches and docks." Because the Columbia and Snake Rivers form approximately half of the City's border (approximately 14 miles) it is appropriate to consider the Pasco Rivershore Area the "front door" to Pasco from the vantage of sister cities Richland and Page 1 of 2 Kennewick, and treat the Rivershore Area as a key resource in the ongoing project of cityscape enhancement. The following changes were made to the Plan according to recommendations from the Planning Commission: • General Opportunities: Item #16 dealing with residential development and criminal activity was eliminated • General Constraints: Lack of way-finding signage was added as a constraint. • Rivershore Estates: A reference was added pointing to the Broadmoor Concept Plan which was adopted by City Council. • Columbia View#G: The proposed Columbia View trail along the river was eliminated. • Chiawana Park#H: Proposal for limited seasonal vendors was added • Chiawana Park#H: Proposal for a second boat launch was added • Chiawana Park#H: Proposal for a beach area was added • Chiawana Park#H: Proposal for"Community Center"type structures was added • Chiawana Park Proposed Map: Access Point#3 was eliminated(No ROW) • Wade Park: Proposed beaches added • Underneath Bridges: Restrict access to eliminate "squatting." • Horrigan Farms/Central Pre=Mix: Add Non-Motorized boating area (Near wildlife reserve area?) The Linkages and Amenities Plan is structured with a general amenities section and then broken down into individual sections representing geographical segments, each pertaining to a length of the river with similar characteristics. Each segment has a set of maps showing existing and proposed amenities, as well as a brief narrative for that area. The narratives, in turn, cover ownership, existing landscaping and natural features, transportation and access, general land use patterns, current linkages and amenities, opportunities, and constraints. Each section concludes with a selection of short- and long-range recommendations for that segment. Recommendation: Motion: I move that the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the 2012 Rivershore Linkages and Amenities Plan. Page 2 of 2 • LlnLagc • '� Pan C 1 of ra,5co, Wa,5kington IL F { 4' 'V 7TIk �d ti �� Rivershore UnLage and Amenity Plan City of Pasco,Washington Draft,June 15, 2012 TAF)LE-O CONTF-NT5 INTRODUCTION a) /cope 6) Definitions C) bacLground J) Purpose Guiding Principles e) General Challenges Inventory Concepts a) Ownership k) Landscape 6, Natural Features C) Transportation J) General Land Use Pattern e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory 0 Linkage and Amenities Opportunities v) Linkage and Amenities Constraints h) Phasing,jtrategies—,short/ id/Long 1) Potential Implementation Actions J) Maps & Images Page 2 of 1 1 3 Deknitions Amenities: Pudic conveniences which enhance the River/Trail experience, such as Drinking fountains, restrooms, parks and picnic areas, and boat facilities. Destination: facilities such as recreational areas, community centers, and commercial enterprises which are attractive and enhance the River/Trail experience. Linkage: (5ee upland Linkage River: In this Plan "River" refers to the system of Columbia and Snake Rivers which surround the City of Pasco. Trail: The 5acagawea Heritage Trail winds along the Columbia River around the Tri-Cities area. Upland Linkage:A multimodal transportation route connecting the Columbia River and 5acagawea Heritage Trail to proximal destinations which have the potential of enriching the River/Trail experience. 5coPe andArea The City of Pasco 5horeline Amenities Plan includes all waterfront areas along the city limits of Pasco, extending along the Snake River from the northeastern reach of the City of Pasco's urban Growth boundary (uGF)> near Highway 1 2, south to the confluence Of the Snake and Columbia Rivers at the southernmost point of 5acajawea State Park, and then west and north along the Columbia River to the northern point of the uGPj at Dent Road. This plan is focused on rivershore trails, recreation amenities, community gathering spaces, development opportunities, wayfinding, and connecting to downtown and neighborhood lands, as well as establishing or improving gaps across bridges, natural areas, railway tracks, roads and parks. Jurisdictions and Agencies • City of Pasco — The City of Pasco is the lead agency for and sole proprietor of this Plan. Located along the Columbia River's northern shore, the City of Pasco has many residential neighborhoods that abut the 5acagawea Heritage Trail. • Franklin County - Franklin County is located north of the Columbia River and includes the City of Pasco. ]=ranklin County also has rivershore land in unincorporated areas. Page 5 of i 1 3 • Port of Pasco -The Port of Vasco operates an intermodal rail hub, barge terminal, industrial and business parks in the riverfront area between the Cable bridge and Sacajawea State Park. Osprey Pointe is the Port of Pasco's newest business development protect along the river. • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - The W5. Army Corps of E-ngineers (USACE-) has jurisdiction over use and development standards along the Columbia River. The constructed levees are maintained by the USACL as a flood control tool for the region. Backsround The Columbia and 5nake Rivers form approximately half of the city's korcler (approximately 14 Miles) making the Pasco Rivershore Area the "front door" to Pasco from the vantage of both Richland and Kennewick, and thus the Rivershore Area is a key resource in the ongoing project of cityscape enhancement. Past planning efforts pertaining to the local shorelines, including the City of Pasco Rivershore Area have resulted in a plethora of documents ranging from regional, cooperative efforts to local plans. The following comprise a partial list of documents reviewed in preparation of this plan: 1) TRLC Tri-Cities Rivershore Ma,5ter Plan 2012 2) Comprehensive Plan 2007-2027 3) F)P1C Shoreline Permit;April 2008 4) Parks & Recreation Plan 2005 update 5) broadway Properties Land use and Market Analysis; December 2004 �) Master Plan;5acajawea Heritage Trail: May 2000 7) Tri-Cities Rivershore E_nhancement; 1 997 8) Pasco Rivershore r—nhancement vision Some of the plans are broad in scope and general in their outlook; others are highly focused with measurable outcomes. Page 4 of i 1 3 Project Purpose The 201 2 Tri-Cities Rivershore Master Plan encourages the participatingjurisdictions to "develop facilities and programming that face and embrace the river, rather than turning away from it." `jimilarly, The Pasco Vision of the Comprehensive Plan reads: "All residents of the city are afforded access to the Columbia River. Pasco is oriented toward and connected with the River through parks, pathways, bikeways, boats launches and docks" (Comprehensive Plan; "The Pasco Vision for 2027;" introduction N. The ten overarching elements of the 2012 Tri-Cities Rivershore Master Plan are as follows: i . Improve wayfinding and identity. 2. Integrate and interpret arts, culture, heritage and environmental features. 3. Create "place" through viewpoints, seating areas and user amenities. + E_nhance water-oriented activities and recreation. 5. Increase birding and wildlife viewing opportunities. 6. E-nhance linkages to and from the rivershore, across the river, and through historic downtowns, commerce, and cultural areas. 7. L,nliven the rivershore through formal and informal programming. S. 5trengtken the connection with the Yakima Delta and the Yakima and 5naLc River systems. 9. Re-engage the riverfront through land use. 10. Implement priority rivershore enhancement projects. The Rivershore Linkage and Amenities Plan provides guidance for a coordinated and efficient overall pattern of development in the long term which can maximize benefit for stakeholders, the City of Pasco, and the wider community. It delineates an approach for connecting the public to the jacagawea f tentage Trail and the extensive Columbia River waterfront. It is based on a specific vision with supporting goals and objectives drawn from over 35 years of planning efforts. Project Guiding Principles The primary Goals of this document are to identify appropriate upland linkages to the jacagawea Heritage Trail, city parks, and public access points on the Columbia River, and to provide recommendations on future location of same. Linkages to and from the River/Trail only make sense when they lead to recreational facilities such as parks and Page 5 of 1 15 sports facilities, commercial enterprises such as retail shops, restaurants and hotels/motes, and community facilities such as art galleries, museums, and theaters.Amenities enhance the River/Trail experience and male it a place worth visiting.. The best facilities and amenities are clustered in synergistic relationships and are attractive to local citizens and visitors alike. These amenities are within a comfortable waking distance, and ideally, within sight of the River/Trail. The upland LinLages can 6e promenades, creating a "view portal" for many of these upland attractions. x Page 6 of 1 1 3 General Challenges Wkile each segment of the River/Trail along Pasco's shoreline offers a unique mix of Challenges and opportunities, a few of these challenges/opportunities can be generalized as follows: 1) Way-Finding: The regional rivershore area lacks a cohesive signage and way-finding system;The City of Pasco should work with the otherjurisdictions to create and adopt a cohesive, regional signage and way-finding system. 2) Parking areas for River/Trail access: Access points to trail and River are not sufficient. (Jnless a visitor lives within walking/bicychng distance of the Trai l/River, they need a place to park vehicles. Parking should be integrated into access features. 5) Accessibility from trai%water to commercial amenities: Lew connections exist to link the City's urban areas to the rivershore trail system.Trail users need well-marked, direct, safe and convenient walking and bicycling routes to the water at locations that can serve large potential usergroups. Improving these connections can bring important economic development and transportation benefits to the City of Pasco.A synergistic relationship can occur between commerce and River/Train activity, but only if those commercial amenities are within reach of the River/Trail system. rocus should be on River/Trail planning on an area within easy walking distance (not more than 1/4 mile) from the River/Trail. Projects to consider include improved trail connections between Pasco's urban center and the 5oat 5asin/Marine Terminal area; between downtown Pasco and Osprey Pointe 51-1511-less Park; and between the Pasco urban core area east of -595 and the river area between the Pjlue and Cable F)ridges. 4) Levees: the levees were built to protect the citizens against flood events. However they create a nearly insurmountable obstacle to boaters, waders and anyone desiring general access to the river. The City of Pasco's system of levees creates a visual and physical separation between the rivershore and developed areas. Levee #2 between Wade Park at Road 59 and Ivy Glades should be prioritized as needed trail improvements to establish visual and physical access to the river. 5) Army Corps of Engineers "Wildlife, Management Area": Wildlife areas are desirable for protecting the environment and enhancing biological functionality. However Page 7 of 1 15 overgrown areas adjacent urban areas more often become refuge areas for criminal activity rather than for woodland creatures. With hundreds of miles of river frontage compared tojust a few miles along the City limits, it may 6e wise to rethink how wildlife areas are managed close to urban areas. dements such as public supervision and access need to be addressed. Trails with periodic "lookout" points would serve the dual function of granting public access to wild areas and create better public supervision of these areas. 6) Location/Distribution of current amenities: Amenities attract, and lack of amenities deters visits to the River/Trail. basic amenities relate directly to River/Trail enjoyment, and include, but are not limited to the following: a) Drinking fountains: Walkers, runners, bicyclists, recreationalists and picnicking families, all depend on availability of water. Drinking fountains should 6e placed periodically along the Trail and clustered with park facilities such as pavilions and picnic areas. AMIR, 6) Restrooms: River and Trail users also depend on availability of restroom facilities. Restrooms should be clustered with park facilities such as pavilions and picnic areas, and should 6e stationed periodically in pocket parks along the Trail. c) trade (trees/picnic pavilions): In the semi-arid Tri-Cities area, protection from the summer sun is desirable and adds to the pleasure of the River/Trail experience. Shade areas are severely lacking along the Trail on the Pasco side of the River. Along with tree planting, placement of picnic pavilions is crucial for enjoyment along the River/Trail. Picnic Pavilions would typically 6e clustered with parks and pocket parks. d) benches: The Trail has an assortment of seating areas, although very few of them are coupled with natural or artificial shading. Seating should 6e strategically clustered with both tree planting and pavilion placement areas along the River/Trail. e) Parks: General gathering places are important for increasing social bonds and a sense of community. Parks serve a community purpose in providing some of those meeting places. Parks should 6e designed with high public visibility and supervision so as to reduce the incidence of vandalism and criminal activity.A well-designed park will have houses, apartments and/or condominiums along the periphery, each with park-facing porches and balconies. This design will serve the dual function of Page 8 of 1 15 increasing supervision of park facilities and increasing the desirability and value of park-side homes. 0 Availability of dog cleanup facilities: ror the sake of sanitation, good manners, and aesthetics, canine waste cleanup stations should be Provided Periodically, with City of Pasco dog nuisance code prominently displayed. g) Current residential development along river: One of the main obstacles to linkage and amenities development along the River/Trail will be developed residential areas. Homeowners typically desire parks but resent the higher traffic volumes and intrusion of strangers into their neighborhoods. 7) River Crossings: The Nue and Cade ridges were not designed with non-motorized traffic as a priority, and are severely limited in terms of trail width, accessibility and safety. The effort to provide state-of-the-art separated Class I multiuse paths over them should be explored. MSG Consultants has also suggested exploring the possibility of a cantilevered pedestrian bridge built to the side of the 15N5r bridges to improve the range of river crossing choices for trail users. If a future bridge is built, bike and pedestrian access should be a priority. 8) Railroad: The P)N5F railroad bridge between the 50at p)asin and Marine terminal requires pedestrians traveling along the Rivershore to go around and over it via the Ainsworth Overpass, forcing People away from the water. This also serves to further isolate the 15oat P)asin neighborhood kringing a higher crime and gang risk factor to the neighborhood. Efforts to build a f'jN5F/,5acagawea Trail underpass should be enthusiastically pursued. 9) bridge (Jnderstructure: ridge understructures are targets for graffiti and are periodically used as transient shelters. Landscaping, screening, and other measures should be pursued to discourage access to and vandalism of these areas. General Opportunities FF. i) Provide potential links to commercial and civic districts 2) Improve existing trails and build new trails to patch gaps in trail system 3) incorporate more interpretive 5ignage & informational plaques 4) Encourage more boat and water-oriented activities 5) Commercia l/industrial zoning along river: a) Potential accessibility from trail/water to commercial amenities: Page 9 of 1 15 b) Potential restaurants/eateries/refreshment establishments c) Potential sportinggoods: i) bicycle/roller blade renta l/repair ii) bait and tackle iii) boat iv) Moorin�Q/docLs/slips V) Sales vi) Kental vii) Maintenance/repair AAA Lk viii)fueling J) Potential General Shopping: i) Art galleries ii) Tourist shops iii) Specialty shops 6) Provide self-guided smart phone tours addressing unique history, culture and environment of the Tri-Cities. E_xamples include: Mid-Century House and Historic Alphabet House Tour, Port of Pasco Tour, Environmental Preserve Areas, Tri- Cities bridges and Pompy,'s Lessons trail markers. 7) Guiding development of vacant land along trails a) Pocket Parks in vacant lots along river: Small lots along the path may be suitable for "pocket" park rest areas, areas with minimal amenities for bicyclists and pedestrians and the occasional boater using the Jiver/Trail h) Possible access points to trail: Small }liver/Trail-adjacent lots may also serve as KOW and minimal parking for trail access. c) Possible access points to water 8) Complement Pompy's Lessons trail markers with smart-phone codes. 9) Consider low-profile and night sky sensitive lighting at key gathering spots along the trail for improved safety and visibility 1 o) Develop kiosks and gateway features 1 1) "zero" habitat along levee areas: Levees are constructed with an impermeable core covered with large basalt rip-rap. As the minimum State of Washington/ Department of E_cology requirement for development along rivers is "no net loss of ecological function," permitting for heavier public access and uses should be easier. Page 100f 1 1 3 1 2) broadmoor Area Plan: The Plan for this area west of Road i 00/broadmoor boulevard has been approved by the Pasco City Council. 1 3) Osprey Pointe Plan: The Plan for this areajouth of Ainsworth Avenue and East of the boat basin/urine Terminal has been approved by the Pasco City Council and Phase One is now kuilt. I+) boat basin/urine Terminal Plan: The Plan for this area 5outk of Ainsworth Avenue and East of the Cable bridge has been approved 6y the Pasco City council. 15) Army Corps of Engineers Wildlife Management Area: This stretch of land is under public ownership and can be planned for and permitted as a single entity. i Page i 1 of 1 1 3 jnventory Rivershorejegments The Segments are numbered 1-20, beginning upriver on the Columbia River at the City of Pasco Urban Growth Boundary (UC-35)just north of the Kohler Segment, flowing downstream to jacagawea Park, and then continuing upstream along the SnAe River to the Tidewater Terminal Segment. Lack Segment is an arbitrary DreaLdown of river frontage which contains somewhat similar characteristics ivershorejegments Map below). Inventory of existing amenities The following amenities have been installed e City of Pa- I bore-line to date: 1) Access points 2) beaches 5) F)iLC Path/Tram 4) boat Launches 5) r_nvironmenta%wildlife conservation/protection areas 6) historic markers 7) interpretive ele x 8) Landscaping A 9) Levee Lowering 1 O) Paring areas i i) Part/Sport yields 12-) Picnic areas/Pavilions 1 3) Pubic piers I+) Restrooms 15) Waterfountains Page 12 of l i 3 Kcfer ■1 Dream View l� Pasc anch WI E Q Hor an arms s Col bia View awana Park' Sunset Acres Levy# Wade Park Moo ion fngo Village City of Pasco iew Park e Bri F dge Basin Yid r Port Rivershore Segments ank 2011 Legend Port of Pasco Ainsw 'Yawn 01 Kohler 08 Sunset Acres 15 Marine Terminal Sacagawe ark 02 Dream View ° 09 Levee#2 ® 16 Boat Basin ® 03 Pasco Ranch 10 Wade Park 17 Port of Pasco 04 Harrigan Farms 11 Moore Mansion 18 Sacagavvea Park 05 Rivershore Estates 12 Flamingo Village 19 Ainsworth Town 06 Columbia View 13 Riverview Park 20 Tidewater Terminal 07 Chiawana Park 14 West Cable Bridge Kohler a) Ownership: Private/(J5 Government b) Landscape and Natural Features: The land along this segment is fairly flat, with a short drop-off into the river. The shoreline is thickly vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs. Farming activities occur within about 30 yards of the river.A private unimproved road separates an orchard/vineyard from the river. C) Transportation: There is no direct public access to the River at this segment. The closest public right-of-way is Kohler Road. Wkile the road connects to Dent Road to the South, right-of-way has not been secured to connect the two. J) General Land Use Pattern: 1) Agricultural Areas: Farming activities occur within about 30 yards of the river. A private unimproved road separates an orchard/vineyard from the river. ii) Natural Area: A 20 yard strip of (J5 Government-owned natural area lies between the private road and the River. iii) Preservation of View Corridors: Due to the flat terrain in this section of the River views would he limited to those structures built close to the River. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: None in this segment f) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Public ownership of about 20-30 yards of land along the river would allow the extension of the Sacagawea f jeritage Trail along this section. This section is undeveloped except for farming activities, and may lend itself well to a park/River/Trail access point. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: there is neither direct public access to the River nor secure Right-of-Way from Kohler Road to Dent Road at this time. Roads to the property lead through neighborhoods and are designed for low-volume traffic. h) RE_COMME_NDATION5: Short-Term Recommendations: Page 14 of t t 3 i) Work with Army Corps, the County and Property owners to design and build a continuation of the 5acagawea Trail north to the (Arban Growth P)oundary ((.IGf)) line. ii) Secure the Right-of-way From Dent Road to Kohler Road and purchase land For ROW From Kohler road to the shoreline and For Future park development. iii) Include bona Pile river access points/Future parks along this section of trail which connect to Kohler and Dent Roads. iv) Wjth Property owner approval (and covenant) Pjegin irrigation and tree planting along proposed greenkelt. V) Secure ROW and purchase park property. Long--Term Recommendations vi) Develop a public park with access off of Dent/Kohler r Continue 5acagawea heritage Trail with "pocket" parks along river. �'� WN to �-- �,� _ r _ (ill► `�' �. - i Page 1 5 of 1 1 5 Kohler Proposed Kohler Segment til H N eT w R L ♦ - + ......... S ... 0 30 00 80 120 150 Legend --- Sacanawea Iran Proposed j• ;- _� inow i ii i. UQ �R Cu 0 � - t —r-� yR�uina.arA.rireeeeA�ir�a�Ane w r it i Ae AAA i AAl eA� iRi nAer—e f r if R �, n f r A A A R R Dream view a) Ownership: Private/U5 Government k) Landscape and Natural f=eatures: The land along this segment is fairly flat, with a short drop-off into the river. Area developed with high-end residential units within about 100 yards of the river. The shoreline is vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs. C) Transportation: There is no direct public access to the River at this segment. The closest public rights-of-way are neighborhood streets branching off from Kohler Road. While Kohler road connects to Dent Road to the South, right-of-way has not keen secured to connect the two. J) General Land use Pattern: 1) Residential Development: This area is developed with higher-end residential units in a mix of four sukdivisions and a series of short plats. ii) Natural Area:A strip of u5 Government-owned natural area ketween 20 and 150 yards separates the river from residential uses. iii) Preservation of view Corridors: Due to the flat terrain in this section of the River views are limited to those structures kuilt close to the River. Most River frontage lots have keen developed. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: None in this segment f) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Puklic ownership of about 20-150 yards of land along the river would allow the extension of the 5acagawea heritage Trail along this section. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: there is neither direct public access to the River nor secure Right-of-Way from Kohler Road to Dent Road at this time.Some homeowners have extended their residential landscaping onto public lands. h) RE_COMME_NDATION5 Short-Term Recommendations: Page 17 of t t 3 1) Work with Army Corps, the County and property owners to design and build a continuation of the jacagawea Trail north to the Urkan Growth ff)oundary (UGN line. Oktain KOW for access to the Trail. ii) include bona hole river access points/future parks along this section of trail which connect to ]_ohler and Dent Koads. iii) With property owner approval (and covenant) F)egin irrigation and tree planting along proposed trail extension. Long--Term Kecommendations iv) Greenkelt/parks/pocket parts along river; �kU _ .-a'. Wage 1 8 of i l 3 Dream View Dream View Proposed Segment N N w E f W E ` s S 8 rxxx D 75 150 225 300]T5 Legend .... Sacagawea Trail Proposed e� Y n i Dream View 4 Cross-Section Concept 00 Dream Vierry ��3�e 20 4- 1 1 3 Pasco Ranch a) Ownership: Private/U5 Government b) Landscape and Natural Features: The land along this segment is fairly flat, with a short drop-off into the river. Orchard farming activities occur within about 100 yards (or less) of the river. The shoreline is vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs. The water is fairly shallow along here, and wide shallow areas are periodically exposed during low water events c) Transportation: Court Street runs along the south half of this segment up to Dent Road, where direct access is available to an irrigation pump station and a private dock. Right-of-way has not been secured for either Dent or Court Street in this section. J) General Land Use Pattern: i) Residential Development: This area is developed with scattered farmstead residential units at the periphery of farming activity. ii) Natural Area:A strip of(15 Government-owned natural area ketween 20 and i 50 yards separates the river from residential uses. This area has been designated ky the US Army Corps of Engineers as a "Wildlife Management Area." Hunting is permitted, but no motorized vehicles are allowed. iii) Preservation of View Corridors: There is a slight rise in the terrain in this section of the River, which would allow for suktle views close to the River. A handful of modest homes have been built in a cluster near the river. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: None in this segment 0 Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Dent Road cuts directly inland from the middle of this segment, giving residents of northwest Pasco easy access to the site. As well, Shoreline Road (formerly Court Street) separates the private ownership from the Public lands, reducing the potential for shoreline owner resistance to park and trail proposals. Public ownership of about 20-150 yards of land along the river would allow the extension of the Sacagawea Heritage Trail along this section. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Land along this segment of the River has }peen designated by the Army Corps of Engineers as a "Wildlife Management Area." Page 21 of 1 1 5 Any trail development will go through a strict Army corps review and approval process. h) RECOMME-NDATION5: NOTE—the 5ouMern % of Vasco Kanch is Part of the BroadmoorArea flan and leas been extensive y evaluated and planned ]these recommendations correspond to thatgeneralPlanning effort. Short-Term Recommendations: i, Work with Army Corps, the County and property owners to design and build an extension of the 5acagawea Trail with raised wildlife watching decks on piers as a continuation of the 5acagawea Tram north toward the Urhan Growth boundary ((.ICE)) line. ii) Include bona Pde river access points/future parks along this section of trail which connect to Dent Road and Shoreline Road (formerly Court Street). Long-Term Recommendations iii) GreenkeIVparL,5/pocket habitat areas along river; ".. So r 4`� gage 22 of 1 1 3 �f Y - > Jill lilt]1 ;l3 F 1 r \ s � ' . 1 5 t Page 25 of 1 1 3 P (�'v'v'v'vaQRP... Pasco Ranch - ' Pasco Ranch Amenities , N Segment N W E w E r' 8 t Legend 0 150 340 350 600 750 / !F KkHITAT_AR'EA Fqa[ Aien.�Privelel JG C� Y [v. N j 1. p• i � r § 2 pp Np h _ _.m,m 000 < v nch \a rZ> of11 f" r • rl' Wit Pasco Ranch frric,�atioro Pimps -- r M1 �_-� - i:�,v'✓M�S�� _ "�° re's. r f� It'is Am Page 26 of 1 13 Wildlife Management Area Hunting Permute No Motorized Vehicles For Information Contact: U-S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla [district 201 N. 3rd St- Walls Walls, WA 59362 (509) 527-7136 1 I US Army Corps of Engineers Face 27 of i i 5 Horrigan Farms a) Ownership: Private/(15 Army Corps of Engineers b) Landscape and Natural Features: The land along this segment is fairly flat, with a short and increasingly steep drop-off into the river toward the south. East of Shoreline Road (formerly Court Street) orchard farming activities occur on the north of the City Limits line, and Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation south of the City Limits line. West of Shoreline Road and down to the River the shoreline is heavily vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs. c) Transportation: Shoreline Road (formerly Court Street) runs along the entire length of this segment between the Army Corps of E_ngineers designated Wildlife Management Area to the West and Horrigan Farms Orchard to the East. J) General Land use Pattern: i) Residential ]development:There is one residential unit along this segment. ii) Industrial uses: The Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation has a long- term lease on the land. iii) Natural Area: A strip of Army Corps of E_ngineers-owned natural area between 20 and 150 yards separates the river from residential uses. This area is a Wildlife Management Area. iv) Preservation of view Corridors: There is a slight rise in the terrain in this section of the River, which would allow for subtle views close to the River. A handful of modest homes have been built in a cluster near the river. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: None in this segment 0 Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: 1) Preservation of view Corridors: Views along the Columbia River in the broadmoor area have a strong potential for value-added development. View corridors should be maximized for optimal visual access to the river. ii) S' trong visibility of broadmoor from -i 82 rreeway: The north end of the I- 182 bridge is a majorgateway into the City of Pasco and this section especially Of the 5roadmoor area should be designed and built in such a way as to "put our best foot forward." Page 28 of 1 1 3 iii) Columbia River Natural Character & Recreation: This section of the Pasco Rivershore lends itself well to fulfilling the needs of both recreationalist and naturalist. extending the Sacagawea Heritage Trail should 6e a high near-term Priority, granting foot and bicycle access to the more than 40 acres of designated natural area. boat access via boat launches and docks is an equally high Priority. iv) Mineral Extraction Area: The long-term Plan for the mineral extraction area is to create a boat marina and a mixed-development of retail commercial and high- end shorefront residential units. �n��aa, 9) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: i) Impact of Mining / Industrial Uses: The current gravel mining operation physically separates the upper property from the River. The externalities of a mining operation also have obvious impacts. ii) Local Roadways and Truck Traffic: r�eavy industrial and agricultural traffic negatively impact the area. iii) Physical Separation from the River: Large tracts of agricultural land separate the River from the upper Pjraodmoor area. iv) River Plow / Drift Material: 7 he Pjroadmoor area is at the curve of the Columbia River, and a natural collection area for silt, debris, drift wood and other waterborne materials. A) Kr-COMMr-NDATION5: NOTE-the 5roadmoorArea Plan complete y encompasses the f J/orr�an rarW5 area. The text of the )jroadmoor Area Plan indicates the following for the Hor-gan arms area: QPen 15race --- The government owned Property between the shoreline and,jhoreline Koad leas been designated in the Comprehensive P/an as an open space area. The area is also identified as a critical area geologically and for habitat purposes. Hiking and walking trails through this area would provide for public access and minimal use o)C the area for recreation and public e�joyment of the river. Trails through this area to view points along Me river would support the Comprehensive Plan vision statement dealing with access to the Page 29 of I 15 river. Coordination with tbeArmy Cores ofE ngineers along with shoreline Ofrmits may be necessary for the develofIment of trails in this area." Tlie following recommendations are more foctl5ed e)CKorts within the general)5roadmoor Area flangui (flin(fs: Short-Term Recommendations: 1) WorL with Army Corps to design and build a continuation of the 5acagawca Trail along the river to City Limits line. Work with County and Property owners to design and build a continuation of the 5acagawea Trail to the northernmost Orban Growth P)oundary line. ii) Include bona Pde river access points/future parks along this section of trail which connect to Shoreline road. iii) �jegin negotiations with Army Corps to establish part facilities/raised view decks along river(see link recommendation). IV) With Property owner approval (and covenant) begin irrigation and tree Planting along proposed greenbelt. Long--Term Recommendations v) Improve area for waterfowl and elevated bird watching along the rivershore trail, adding nature trails as needed vi) Greenbelt park/poc6t wildlife preserve areas along river and along main boulevard; VII) Pjoat basin and launch; Possible restricted, non-motorized only boating area near wildlife reserve area. viii) Rivershore commercial development scaled to pedestrian/bicycle traffic. Page 30 of 1 15 Horrigan Farms orrigan Farms Amenities h Segment N r N •13 w E w E S : s 11®n t 1 0 150 .31)11 asn HO 750 13ne[Leunch Fenl y. ® Pt-ea1H.bdtA.. �r t' OL) - .. Cry CD ' v+ V+ • v.. +± ' .P Co a r- 0 M CL J w L i SHORELN e^ r r Page 5 2 of 1 1 3 6)20 92007 1:45 PM N-4;-or r. "' w,' y, �i,' ti��t¢ w,`� ♦r �,. :' 'ale R '?r�S"' y` 4f "•• rier s . ..�� ! �:;� rn* _ r4' t a� •ilr. +�i r s '►N'ii leg ,,� ,� k `�. tf`F mu.-✓x�d �.y:A a ��'`f��" a aF`i`^F t!.:� ��w.r� �'� � � �„'� 3 � '� Y "a ...w a' "„�-,R'1"�Y�e^- �' r yl�- �+..'�' � ��i fy x k ah�•ar��[w ��-�r lT� • f1+Ir:.� •�' '# si' f . 1 � �,A wl AI►A�?9 t 'r�xfi:"e. . c 'Y,. # }�11��y� ��� ��,�y � � _ a if+ w z,' e • 7ea F ip'i 'i Ig i6wo���'�!��i�!'���g�.kA S.$4wxi " .' i 40 ,� t { 414V _ • tF + Fame 33 of i 1 3 ' '..F �•yqY ter/.. -e f , t -Welk : +EI. `x'es in ii d&"jk IS'. "It. •k� �;._ rr K ;4b •r � !-f. - :p a 5 Ak _ l � 3 PO OW ;v E Page 54 of 1 15 Horrigan Fauns Flom a n Farms wren View deck 7�t Richland US Army Corps of Engineers Management Lake Wallula Page 55 of 1 15 Greenbelt Townhomes Along Arterial \ High End Boulevard `\,\ 'View'Housing Butter Medium SF Oriented r.L I7 To River 'High End'River • � � � 'Main Street' Housing - - Civic Feature; Playf elds.Active Park Or Civic Use Regional Retail FHASI?y, `� - Center 'High End'Housing ice-'-°" —. :i Rd.RealIgnment. Interchange Boulevards Commercial Townhomes Greenbelt +� —i Near Retail Improved River Park I a Boulevard Sanditur Pkwy Townhomes I Medium S,F. Condominiums Oriented To River At Boat Basin 11,a t N R, Boat Basin�Marina _ Office Uses -- Near Freeway —_ Public Use. "- Marina.Related School Commercial Center h►- ovS'- .year q-4 o l` W L tz PW- Page 36 4 i 1 3 Horrigan Farms "Lighthouse" At . 8 Page 57 of i 1 5 Rivershore F states a) Ownership: Private/U5 Government b) Landscape and Natural Features: The land along this segment has a steep, -+O-to 50-foot drop into the river. The shoreline is moderately vegetated with a mix of native and non-native trees and shrubs.A high-end, 33-lot subdivision separates the Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation from the River. The development is nearly half built out. C) Transportation: 5koreline Road and Court jtreet run between the gravel pit and the residential area along the river. An unimproved river access road connects jhoreline Road to the River about 300 yards west of the subdivision. J) General Land Use Pattern: 1) Residential }development: A 33-lot high-end subdivision along the river is nearly half built out. ii) Natural Area: A 15-20 yard strip of (J5 Government-owned natural area lies between the residential lots and the River. iii) Preservation of View Corridors: Views are limited Beyond the 22 river frontage lots. IV) industrial Uses: The Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation occupies the majority of the area north of 51-Ioreline Road/Court Street and has a long- term lease on the land. e) Current Linkage and Amenities inventory: A parking area has been installed adjacent the 5acagawea heritage Trail and under the I-i 82 P)ridge. f) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Public ownership of about 15-20 yards of land along the river would allow the extension of thejacagawea Heritage Trail along this section, although the trail cross-section would need to accommodate the steep sloping bank. There exists an unimproved access road and informal boat launch south of Rivershore }give about 300 yards west of the subdivision. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The Central Pre-Mix gravel extraction operation occupies the majority of the area north of jhoreline Road and Court jtreet and has a long-term lease on the land. Page 38 of 1 15 h) RE-COMMENDATION5-. Short-Term Recommendations: 1) Work with Army Corps, the County and property owners to design and build a continuation of thejacagawea Tram north along this segment. ii) Improve the existing river access point boat launch and add a "rocket" park. iii) begin irrigation and tree planting along proposed greenbelt. Long--Term Recommendations iv) build a Pjoat basin on the current Central Pre-Mix gravel mine. Pjuild the marina as the centerpiece for mixed residential and commercial development. v) Develop area according to the broadmoor Concept Plan adopted by the City. .S i r, - VF RIv —E648 G" OL Cro®e-9eclkrt c.—Pt 'i op 4F - y i RivOrShc+r9 E6t�4WB Pagc )9 of i 13 r Rivershore Estates Segment tf w E 0 "n 7.00 Aso- 600 750 Feel ......�° ID y HAR1RM RD ATERS EDGE DR N w E s Rivershore Estates Amenities Legend L`1 80AT_LAUNCH SACAGAVr.A_TF?AL Page 40 of I 1 j SHORELINE RD wKr IN W E s Rivershore Estates ' IPr osed Legend Sarnaw a Trans Prerwsw _ FarWng Pwpceea 1 b .. 0 Rivershore Estates Pig Farm Page 41 of 1 15 ,r. t I Rivershore Estates River Access across from Central Pre-Mix 6;2 i2OO7 9L. • ' .4b i t � f Page 42 of 1 1 3 Columbia view a) Ownership: Private/(j5 Government b) Landscape and Natural reatures: The land along this segment has a very steep slope profile. The shoreline is moderately vegetated with residential landscaping elements mixed with native and non-native trees and shrubs. c) Transportation: Court Street runs between the riverfront residential area and more upland residential subdivisions. Although an unimproved road leads from Court Street down to a rranklin County irrigation District pump station, there are no bona kde public access points to the Kiver along this segment. J) General Land Use Pattern: 1) Kesidential Development: The entire length of this segment is built out with upper-middle to high-end single-family residential units, with the exception of a couple of vacant lots and a pump station located about 350 yards from the -1 82 freeway bridge. This area also has the highest concentration of private docks in the study area. ii) Natural Area: A slim strip of US Government-owned land lies between the residential lots and the Kiver. iii) Preservation of view Corridors: Views are very limited beyond the river frontage lots. iv) industrial (Jses: A newly installed City potable water filtration plant is located just north of Court Street, next to the 1-182 freeway bridge. The inlet pump for the filtration plant is located under the -182 freeway bridge. The Franklin County irrigation District pump station is located just beyond the south terminus of Koad i i 1 and blocks the shoreline well into the }liver. e) Current Linkage and Amenities inventory: A parking area has been installed adjacent to the 5acagawea Heritage Trail and under the 1-1 ,52 E)ridge. f) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Public ownership between the residential lots and the river averages around 10 yards, with some lots directly abutting the water line. Page 43 of 1 1 3 9) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The jacagawea Heritage Trail currently runs alongside Court Street in this segment. because of the extreme grade, the okstacle of the Pump station, the Proximity of residential lots to the river, and the high number of Private dock facilities, extending thejacagawea Heritage Trail along the river in this section would require both high-order engineering Prowess and strong Political will. It is not recommended that the 5acagawca Heritage Trail kc extended along the Diver in this area at this time. h) Kr-COMMr-NDATION5: Short-Term Recommendations: i) Negotiate with the I=ranklin Count Irrigation District to use the irrigation district land for a view and River access Park with Parking lot. Long-Term Recommendations ii) Add a view Park with Parking and River access on the rranklin County Irrigation District land. mow .. ... f � . -- .a: ,1y L X11 Y^ .�.' '1 mil! A'F• '�' Columbia View _ o B 0 A at 1-102 lMdga e ,0 y Page 44 of 1 1 j �. '"�Ii►#, � ;�; � �� .ice : ��� 1i oaf � ��► ' •,iii - J70 J.'umbia View Segment �i :.. „u ei ♦'% II CL !� 1 tation page+6 - . J. . ss- � j of Chiawana Park a) OWNr.R5hIP: US Government/Local Government leasehold b) Landscape & Natural Features: Chiawana Park is a partially developed community park with two areas of groomed lawns, one overgrown "natural" area, and the balance of the park periodically-mowed weeded areas. c) Transportation: the Park has only one open access point leading through a neighborhood street out to Court Street. There are seven potential access points along the length of the park (See Chiawana Access Points Map). J) General Land Use Pattern: The area is a designated park, although a fraction of it is actually maintained at this point with full amenities. e) Current Linkage and Amenities Inventory: (See Amenities Map) 0 Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The Chiawana Park area includes large undeveloped areas with potential fors ynergi.5tic water-dependent and water-related enterprises and amenities. There are six potential access points along the perimeter of the park. g) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The Park is leased from the Army Corps of Engineers, and as such, requires Corps approval for even the smallest activity. As well, the ParL is surrounded by an established residential neighborhood. All but one of six potential access points are currently closed to puklic traffic. Activating any of the potential access points is Iikely to ke unpopular with adj'acent property owners. h) Kr.COMMr-NDATION5: Short-term Recommendations: i) Clear undergrowth in "natural" area at north end of part (vandalism/gang activity/public safety hazard) ii) Install (more) drinLingfountains iii) Construct more small "family" scale, and large "family reunion" scale pavilions. iv) Identify and develop future riverside dining venues with scenic, recreational or cultural attributes. Page 47 of 1 1 5 v) E-stablish limited, seasonal mobile vendor lease areas for diverse, small-scale vendors near Pavilion areas; include standards for vendor 9ualit_q/aesthetics. vi) Add/Upgrade restrooms vii) Complete landscaping: Lawn,trees viii) Keserve area for a second boat launch. ix) Plan for a beach area. X) Add "Community Center"type structure. MO MO modi" Long--term recommendations: '•. xi) Construct high-end, pedestrian- `micro-village - e space for diverse, small-scale vendors. . xii) Construct second boat launch. xiii)Construct beach area. =fzzzzzi� a Chlawana Park West End Bike Path Page 48 of 1 1 j ,a : , !I 1 � ■ YY ■' 1111111 IY♦� ii'■ �YYYIII� 1111111111 X1111:': �� 11111:1111111111; ��IIIh- � � -�IYFIIIII11i111�Y�■ own 0 0 �' �� ��■� 11111,�11111■11•••,,•,• �:■■■111� 111111.1111 :IIII:C::� ,�1� �� Ilr 'lllalllllllll� ��IIII- �� � ��� 1■='1.111111111■�■ ' f �a°`airii o �� 7 Proposed . . �. x Legend Park Prap-Bd 41 Chlawana Pa Bike Path En at Court Str Page • of ff f �A CMawana Park ��1 Chlawana Ch[arvana Park West Unimproved Area Page 52 of 1 1 j f 1 � .� . R v_ �t PL 4 MOW 4� r K` y _1 Chlawana Park Pavillions a - 'CIIE Chiawana Park ' Columbia River Shallow Area Face 54 of 1 1 5 x _ ffi k* I r C" ti �,���•tit'i..". Yy A.�_- x� �r s.,kC 'k,Y' ,4 # . y s r or 5unset Acres a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers (private ownerships ad,acent) b) Landscape & Natural Features: mostly flat with mix of native and non-native vegetative types. vegetative growth is mostly sparse weeds and pasture grasses, with dense undergrowth and trees along the River. c) Transportation: Access from Court Street via Roads 76 and 84. The jacagawea heritage Trail is built along the entire segment. J) General Land use Pattern: i) Residential: Over 65 yards of vacant Army Corps of Engineers land separates two single-family residential subdivisions (5unset Acres and Ivy Glades) from the River here. ii) Trail Development: The 5acagawea Heritage Trail is developed along the entire length of this segment. iii) Industrial: A maJor natural gas transmission line extends south and crosses the River from the south terminus of Road 76. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The width of this area lends itself to both developed park and pocket wilderness areas. There are shallower areas to the east whiA may lend themselves to beach development. A boat launch could be located near the end of Road 76. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: There are two access points, one from Road 84 and one off of Road 76. Neither has developed parking at this point. view opportunities for surrounding residences are very limited due to the flat terrain and the tree growth along the River. Any activity close to Road 76 would be highly limited due to the presence of the natural gas transmission line. g) RECOMME.NDATION5= Short-Term Recommendations: i) Develop parking facilities at Roads 76 and 84. ii) Install seating areas and drinking fountains at strategic points along the Trail. iii) Plant clusters of shade trees around the seating areas and drinking fountains. Page 56 of 1 15 Medium-Range iv) Develop a Parking area and mid-sized Park at the terminus of Road 76, complete with restrooms, pavilions, and beach area. v) Develop a "Pocket park" with restrooms at road 84. Long-Term Recommendations: vi) Develop the entire width of the Army Corps land with linear park as an extension of Chiawana 'ark, including small, clustered wildlife areas. vii) Investigate the need for another boat lau, npH lKnp CroBSSklbn COnGPi q A sunset Acres Neer[toad 78 Page 57 of 1 1 3 u Acres Sunset Segment �,,, +IE I !I Sunset Acres Amenities ra9c 58 of I 13 �1�■ �■ �� ,ice.. ��' ' �, �# •i• r -F Il � Sunset Acres ' t Proposed T-1 Park Propo�d Parking Proposed Sunset Acres Parking Area at Road 76 s -r v _ Sunset Acres Path to Columbia River HIGH PRESSUAE NATURAL GAS PIPEUNE CROMM 1-aoo-97z-77s Wms s ,eaoeazt : lmrtl lvn MrurY tia P�9� Page 60 of i 1 j i Sunset Acres Ivy Glades Area MIN �nh�uuaQUU. hh '�aa. Sunset Acres Ivy Gladesl Beginning of Levee#2 Page 61 of 1 15 Levee No. 2 a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers (private ownerships ad' acent) b) Landscape &Natural Features:Army Corps of Engineers rip rap levee C) Transportation: There are three developed public access points (Roads 54, 60, and 68) and one access point through a private subdivision (Ivy Glade between the 7200-7400 blocks) to the levee. J) General Land (Ise Pattern: jingle-family dwelling units in the Ivy Glades, Park Estates,Summer's Park,Allstrom view, and Glen Acres Subdivisions. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: There are three developed public access points to the levee. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The levee and drainage canal between the levee and residential development hinder access to Trail and River along this segment of river shore. Wkile the trail is readily accessible at strategic points, access to the water is accomplished only by a careful climb down a steep, oversized rock embankment. Levee height blocks most river views. g) RECOMME-NDATIONS: Short-Term Recommendations 1) Lower Levee;widen path and add landscape features; ii) pipe and fill landward side of ditch at select locations; Iii) Design and build interpretive signage that describes living river concepts as related to shoreline development, such as rivershore management, natural flood processes, and impacts of manmade levees. Long--term Recommendations IV) Fill,grade, and vegetate river face of levee; v) Create parks with "step" access points/boat docks at road 60, 68. vi) Create beach area in shallows between levee and island. vii) Develop strategically sited signature gateway at 1-1 82 & Road 68 Page 62 of 1 1 5 ys ,S � � s q _ 11 t I r ������.�:■■■■ ,,£:E, �,.,>.•.. - ��■nom son on Levee#2 qpMq Amenities Legend _lam r �J Levee#2 Proposed Legend $ocagowa Troll Proposed Beam Pmposed H Park Proparod Parking Pmpused E Y „ Levee No.2 Drainage Canal _ Page 64 of i 1 j _ _jam h-`.• Levee No.2 Ivy Glades Area r t� Levee No.2 Ivy Glades Area Page 65 of 1 15 I o Levee No.2 Road 68 Area f s' Levee No.2 Road 68 Are a Page 66 of 1 13 d � Levee No. 2 - ---, River Vantage Point s: Levee No.2 Access to Road 88 Page 67 of 1 1 3 Wade Park a) OWNER5HIP: Army Corps of Engineers with City of Pasco/rranUin County lease(?) 6) Landscape & Natural Features: gently sloping with park-type vegetation:grass and trees C) Transportation: The Trail is fully developed along Wade Park. Wade park can be directly accessed from River Haven Street off of Roads 39,40, and Road 44, from Road 52, and from Road 54.A boat launch has been developed at Road 54. J) General Land Use Pattern: The land around Wade Park is fully developed with single-family residential units. The boat launch at Road 54 includes paved parking. /mother park extension with parking, restrooms and other amenities is being developed at Road 54. A rough gravel parking lot at the east end of Wade Park between Road 39 and 40 is owned by a private party but has been made available to the public. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The new boat launch at the west end of Wade Park is easily accessible from Court Street via Road 54, and is near a proposed park with existing parking. This area is adjacent to the boat race course and is augmented with temporary commercial refreshment enterprises during the races. More permanent parking pads with power hookups, which would double as pavilion/picnic areas during the off-season, could be installed. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The Trail along Wade Park can get very hot in the summer due to the lack of shade trees; however adjacent neighbors may object to additional tree plantings of these public areas. g) Kr-COMMr.NDATION5: Short-term Recommendations: i) Place water fountains at strategic locations along path; ii) Plant more shade trees in clusters along the Trail; iii) Place canine cleanup stations at strategic locations along path. Long-Term Recommendations: Page 68 of 1 1 3 iv) build restrooms at both ends of the Pak v) jdentify and develop future riverside dining venues with scenic, recreational or cultural attributes. vi) Develop beach area(s), as Practical. 4. i, R Page 69 of 1 13 Aldp— r l 1[ { CI }fY ] Wade Segment w+E 0 251) $00 750 FM ■����I� 111111■ ■ ■ ■� ■■ ■■ � �� � 1111111 •■ �■ .��■■■■■■�■■�:: ,� _ �1111111 ���■ !� '���■■■■��®■��i I` Wade Amenities Legend Q py T H w e S Wade Park Proposed Legend Park Prapased Beach PIOPO%ad Parl-g Pmpased PPtental Habitat Area �a�e 71 i 1 5 Moore Mansion a) Ownership:Army Corps of E ngineers/WA State Dept of Transportation b) Landscape &Natural Features:Army Corps of Engineers rip-rap levee c) Transportation: The Trail extends the length of the Moore Mansion segment; it can only be accessed from }liver Haven Street off of Roads 59 and 40. J) General Land Use Pattern: Levee #1 terminates between Road 39 and 40 next to a rough gravel parking lot at the east end of Wade ParL which is owned by a private party but has been made available to the public. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: As the segment name implies, this path could have direct access to the Moore Mansion, a prominent historic site within the City. Shallow areas in the River and easy river access near the Road 39/40 ParL entrance may lend to construction of a beach in this area. There is a dedicated but as yet undeveloped (Havistad) parl< platted as part of the Amended Pierret's Subdivision south of Havistad Street which could also add to the appeal of this segment. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Due to the levee and the drainage ditch behind, the area is accessible only at one point, a gravel parking area at Road 39/40, which is rather small and is currently under private ownership. There are at present no potable water or restroom facilities at this location. The platted, but undeveloped Havistad park lot is at a considerably lower elevation than the levee, and would not have the "feel" of a riverfront amenity without visual access to the river. As well, it is separated from the River by the levee drainage canal. g) RECOMMENDATIONS. Short-Term Recommendations: i) pipe and fill landward side of ditch; ii) vegetate landward side of levee with grass, shade trees. iii) Fill,grade, and vegetate river face of levee. Long--Term Recommendations: iv) Develop Havistad Park level with levee. Page 72 of 1 15 v) install a keach area at the Road 39/40 Wade FarL entrance, and extending east approximately 100-200 yards. vi) provide state-of-the-art separated Class I multiuse paths over the blue bridge .. .... Page 73 of 1 1 5 Oz ^d a it �7t-14•- Moore Mansion Segment w E S f. 0, 150 300 d50 500 Feel 1J '� O tY ,�_ HAVSTAp S7 ff 7 / w E s Moore Mansion Amenities Legend ® A—Paint Point of Interest B.-h Upland LinYage aPalklop Area &mpwa T-1 Page 74 of 1 15 �. HAVS7AD sr W E S Moore Mansion Proposed Legend S..g-9a TIM ® Parke Mend Linkage Park Preposed OAcres Point Beady Propeeed Mows M.—n ® Pa+klnq Area ° �rx:.s _ ^'T Page 75 of 1 1 3 Flamingo Village a) Ownership: Army Corps of Engineers with City of Pasco/Franklin County lease(?)/City of Pasco. 6) Landscape &Natural Features:Army Corps of Engineers rip rap levee C) Transportation: Access to the Trail is by way of "A" 5trect near the terminus of 25th Avenue. An undeveloped access point also exists at 20th Avenue. The 25th Avenue access point has keen developed as a pocket park with parking but no amenities J) General Land Use Pattern: The west end of this segment lies ad acent to the Llamingo Village Trailer Park. Lurther east is mostly vacant industrially zoned land. The trail is separated from the trailer park and industrially zoned land by a drainage canal and a significant elevation change up towards the levee. The Levee blocks the view of the river and there is no developed access from the Trail down to the water. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: be-cause of its largely vacant nature, this area between the Pioneer Memorial ("Pjlue") bridge and Ed Hendler ("Cable") Pjridge has perhaps the most development potential of all City of Pasco segments. Retail commercial development could conceivably be built over the current drainage canal with ground-level parking and levee-level (and higher) retail, restaurant, entertainment, and water-dependent/water-related uses. jteps could be built down the face of the levee to the river for"toes-in-the-water" access. 0 Linkage and Amenities constraints: Levees are owned and maintained by the Army Corps of L_ngineers.Any development on or around the levees would require complex and time-consuming reviews. g) RECOMMENDATION5: Short-Term Recommendations: i) Pipe and fill landward side of ditch; ii) Rezone the area along the River for Retail Commercial development Longs--Term Recommendations: iii) Lill, grade, and vegetate parts of the river face of levee (see Pasco Rivershore Enhancement vision). Page 76 of 1 1 5 iv) Develop levee top as a wide commercial boardwalk with Periodic River view decks. v) F)uild stair/step access on parts of the River face of the levee down to the water. vi) Allow/encourage retail commercial to build with street-level parking and upper floor shopping, level with, and directly up to the levee,with full levee access. vii) provide state-of-the-art separated Class I multiuse paths over the blue F)ridge viii)Develop strategically sited signature gateway at and 20th & Sylvester C) I v 7 77 f � i3 i ar ML SA i F- FlamingoVillage Segment + 250 500 750 1 P7rL 111111 mil.-- - �� 11111 V1111111tC ■■ � -■, ILJ Flamingo Village Amenities 1 0� Legend y r III '"" i �i.11l ■ 11111 11111 11111 ��"- !11111'■� �® � 11111 11111 � ■�.i� � 11111 i i i`ii•��- ■ i i i•ii-.� Flamingo Village Proposed Legend _�t� 1� 0 Pawq Area Aa- Ilk Nk �i a { f, s w , C1VCT YYW�pfri feN ppirVrrtY.K EcN�gY Riverview Park a) Ownership: Army Corps of Engineers with City of Pasco/rranklin County lease?)/City of Pasco b) Landscape & Natural Features: Army Corps of Engineers rip rap levee; City of Pasco basebal l/softball facility; City of Pasco Riverview Park. There is a shallow, manmade drainage pond to the west of the park. C) Transportation Access to the Trail is by way of "A" Street from an undeveloped access point at 20th Avenue, and between 1 7th and 1 sth Avenues through the City Of Pasco basebal l/softball field and Riverview Park. A loop of the Trail circles around near the Animal Shelter at 1 St' Avenue. A E)NSr rail spur crosses "A" Street, curving south along the ball fields and loops east roughly parallel to the river. This rail spur is currently being utilized by a single client, a small concrete company leasing land at the Port of Pasco. The spur will be abandoned when the lease expires. J) General Land (Jse Pattern:This area is developed with an animal shelter, a City of Pasco basebal%softball field and Riverview Park. C) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: This is one of the few areas not locked out Of potential "destination" development by residential zoning.The area south of"A" Street could be enhanced with river-oriented commercial uses, augmenting the developed park and sports facilities. The manmade pond has potential for wildlife viewing, fishing for young families, and should be enhanced as park land with grassy areas, pavilions, restrooms, pond access and barbecue amenities. There is potential for a pocket wildlife area as part of the pond-centric development. Once the PjNSr rail spur is abandoned the City should negotiate with the E)N,5r to acquire the land adjacent to the ball fields. This area could benefit from additional baseball fields and the addition of soccerfacilities. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints:The area is still zoned I-1 Light Industrial, and as such can be legally developed with such things as building material storage yards, trucking companies, a central power station, automotive assembly and repair facilities, and blacksmith,welding or other metal shops. g) RECOMMENDATIONS: Page 80 of 1 i 3 Short-Term Recommendations: i) Rezone the area south of"A"Street as C-i Retail Commercial. ii) improve Riverview Park for waterfowl and elevated bird watching along the rivershore trail, adding nature trails as needed; Develop a parl< around the pond with a Pocket wildlife viewing area, fishing areas for young families, grassy areas, Pavilions, restrooms and barbecue amenities. iii) Place drinLingfountains, shade trees, and restr acilities at strategic Points; Long-Term Recommendations: ' iv) rill,grade, and vegetate river face of. (see Pasco Rivershore Enhancement vision. V) Purchase the 5N5r lands east of the ball fields; add baseball and soccer fields. Vi) Develop a beach areajust south of the Riverview ParL. a PAScO R1V"SHORE ENILAkCT NFNT VMOON _~- f 5 � INS-- pi I 1 Page 8 1 of i l j Riverview Park Segment `' T w E S u aog zgn ;w,r� aoo smr Feel `A"ST m �k ASyINGr 2VIEW PA I F - `ti Riverview Park Amenities Legend ACS Pow Work Y�Y, Reshoom N jrc,J E.-h ® Parki-Area Upland l,lnk®ge W + E D—kl rg F.�Mwn 6"1 M.N.Table S"—T-1 E Fame 8 2 0f 1 15 - "A"ST _ -- Shl,y 51' -_ - Riverview Park Proposed li�I X11 Legend secag—ea rrag Parks N _ Mend Linkage Park Prep4sed OAcres Pant Beady Prepesad E - ® Pa,kuq Area r� 1R Ali- IL 'w� '" R` +�►�' 4: `t. ti's'. .- -4 1y y�I Page 8 3 of 1 1 3 West Cable F)ridge a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers b) Landscape & Natural Features: Army Corps of E_ngineers rip-rap levee; E)N5r Railroad spur line; undeveloped scrub land. c) Transportation: A E)N5r Rail spur bisects most of this area; One unfinished access point leads to 13th Avenue. The trail leading to i 3th crosses bNSF land and the Mss rail spur. J) General Land Use Pattern: This area is mostly vacant with some residential and industrial uses along Washington Avenue, extending south towards the River. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: 5ecau5e this area is mostly undeveloped it has more flexibility for future plans. it is close to the ballpark and Riverview park and could eventually ke an extension of and expansion area for that facility. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The ff)N5r-owned rail spur is a prominent and central barrier to any development in this area. (Jntil the spur is abandoned and the land changes hands this area is essentially off-limits to any redevelopment. g) RE-COMMENDATIONS: Short-Term Recommendations: i) Acquire PjNl5F land upon rail spur abandonment. H) pipe and fill landward side of ditch; Long-Term Recommendations: III) Fxtend park facilities east,with picnic areas and typical park amenities. iv) Fill,grade, and vegetate river face of levee (see Pasco Rivershore Enhancement vision). V) provide state-of-the-art separated Class I multiuse paths over the Cable F jri dge Page 84 of 1 15 lift r R 4 West Cable Bridge ` - Segment N is W E S 1 -b 1 oio 200 104) ana 5r�t F-I 4 tea.` P w,, H� GT i r' R lw m West Cable Bridge Amenities Legend LALCM POW ® Picnic Table 9....h Upland Unk.ge Kwsk Proposed Upww Unkagle ® Park+n6 Area $ACACAMkTRAIL Page 85 of i 1 3 A t West Cable Bridge Proposed 0 Legend $acapawea Trait Parks UplaW Linkaga Park Prapo�M 1pflaad_okago_Propo ed 13-0 Prw—od Aca Pant Parking Area YA - I 3 4 e J1 _ I 1I tI Page 86 of 1 1 3 Marine Terminal a) Ownership: Port of Pasco/some private b) Landscape & Natural reatures: Army Corps of E-ngineers rip-rap levee; commercial/industrial area (mostly vacant—marine terminal side); P)NSF railroad main line and trestle bridge to the east; 5acagawea trail does not connect former Port of Pasco marine terminal with boat basin area due to bN5F Railroad tracks and trestle bridge. c) Transportation: The Trail extends through the entire length of this segment. Access is from I Oth Avenue, Washington Street, 9th Avenue, Ainsworth Avenue, andth 4 Avenue. J) General Land (jse Pattern: Mostly vacant industrially zoned land. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The Trail extends through the entire length of this segment. There is a barge dock which would ke an excellent location for an indoor/outdoor waterfront restaurant with integrated dock facilities. Kctail commercial development should ke built with ground-level parking and levee-level (and higher) retail, restaurant, entertainment, and water-dependent/water-related uses.This is another prime potential retail commercial area. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: This is the site of a former WWII fuel tank facility.Some toxic spillage has occurred along the west end of the Marine Terminal area and is in the remediation process. (Jnfortunately, the remediation is "low-tech" and thus more time-consuming. The area may not ke "shovel-ready" for some time. An anxious developer may choose to invest in a more intensive (and expensive) remediation process, but this is not a current likelihood. The two available direct north-south routes from this neighborhood to downtown Pasco are 4th Avenue under the Ainsworth (Jnderpass, and north along the bN5F main rail line to the City Center; and north on I Oth Avenue. While both routes are fairly well 5idewalk- e9uipped for pedestrians, however neither is designed for bicycle traffic. As well, neither route is aesthetically pleasing. g) KE_COMME_NDATIONS: (see boat basin/Marine Terminal Master Plan). 2) Short-Term Kecommendations: Page 87 of 1 1 3 i) Rezone the area for business FarL/Commercial retail. 3) Long-Term Recommendations: i) Invest in higher-tech toxic spill remediation ii) Encourage/Promote development as Per the boat tjasin/Marine Terminal Plan. iii) Fjuild an improved tram connections between Pasco's urban center and the Fjoat basin/Marine Terminal area iv) Consider the possihility of a cantilevered pedestrian bridge bunt to the side of the 5NSF bridge v) Develop strategically sited signature gateway at 4th Ave & Lewis 5t VI) Identify and develop future riverside dining venues with scenic, recreational or cultural attributes. Ak- 11 ?M"P*M A7 $iFaii!undercrossing o" �• Public lreac Columbia River View Point _ Er�hBcsd 6cf�f launch, -� wing,and access Ww marina park 3 { Page 88 0� i 1 3 ' r 0/' - Moir; J9 �. Marine Terminal -• ° T Segment w E S 0 1010 240 3010 400 34g i feet r rw W Marine Terminal — Amenities Legend 'J Access.Pwnt EACAGAVJEA_TRAIL IN` B.-h S—gawea_Tral_P.I:o%@d w E WI_ ReW,w S Page 89 of i 13 n f - r77 SL(.i Q r•�_ Marine Terminal Proposed - —� 0 Legend $a-g—Trail Parks - - Lpllaad Linkage Park ProposM N LtPlood Lnkago Promed Beach Proposed Rmlorond Parking Proposed E Access Pant Caltnerraal Prwp m Fir— u I Page 90 of 1 13 boat basin a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers with City of Vasco ease/Private owners b) Landscape & Natural Features: Army Corps of E_ngineers rip-rap levee and dike; commercial/industrial hoat marina area and boat launch and JocL in disrepair; L)N5r railroad main line and trestle bridge to the west, separating the Port Marine terminal from the boat basin; 5cklaglc City park; modest residential areas; boat launch in disrepair, private marina facility; 5acagawea trail does not connect former Port of Pasco marine terminal with E)oat basin area, due to F)N5r Railroad tracks and trestle bridge. C) Transportation:This area is barricaded in by the 5N5F Railroad main line to the west, The Ainsworth Overpass along the north, and the Port of Pasco's Osprey Pointe protect to the east. Access is from 2"j and Gray avenues to the northeast, and a foot access from the Osprey Pointe development to the east. 5incc the construction of the Ainsworth overpass this area has become further isolated and less accessible, as the overpass cut off access from Railroad, 4th, and 3rd Avenues. rurthermore, thejacagawea Heritage Trail does not go through this area, instead winding north across the overpass avoiding the F)oat Basin neighborhood, and then back down along the river at Osprey Pointe. Neighbors have reported that crime is higher here because the area is isolated from public supervision. J) General Lana use Pattern: A private marina operates in the industrially zoned waterfront area, next to a public boat launch and a public park. Modest residential units occupy the residentially zoned north half of the area. A large percent of these units are owner-occupied and are neatly maintained. There are a few industrially zoned lots in the east part of the neighborhood. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: A neighborhood park is already in place, with a boat launch close by. This basin lends itself well to development of a separate beach/swimming area. However the beach should be designed in a way as to separate swimming and boating activities. if the P)NSF Railroad would allow a trail underpass for thejacagawea Trail under its main line, the Trail could continue through the neighborhood, opening up the neighborhood somewhat and adding public supervision to the area. As the Osprey Pointe project develops to the east, this area will be in higher demand for upscale residential development and an Page 9 1 of 1 1 3 upgrade will ke warranted to the marina facility, with demand for mini-market, boat fueling,fishing supplies, and perhaps restaurant facilities at the marina. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: The F)N5F Railroad has been reluctant in times past to allow for an underpass under its mainline, citing transportation security issues. As well, the Port of Pasco is reluctant to include the boat 5asin in its plans as long as the neighborhood remains unsightly and uninviting to business visitors. The high owner-occupied ratio reduces the likelihood of any major upgrades to the residential neighborhood in the short-term, although as land values in the neighborhood increase due to Osprey Pointe development, owners may kc induced to sell for a reasonakle profit. There are no direct north-south routes from this neighborhood to downtown Pasco. The closest access would require a circuitous route either west along Ainsworth Avenue and south at 6th Avenue, thence circling east and north to 4th Avenue under the Ainsworth Underpass, and north to the City Center; or east to Oregon avenue, north to Lewis 5treet, and west again to the city Center.The former route navigates through industrial and residential areas, the latter primarily through industrial -zones on a truck route that is not hike/pedestrian friendly. g) Kr—COMME.NDATON5- (see boat basin/Tank Farm Master Plan) `jhort-Term Recommendations: 1) Rezone neighborhood to higher-density residential, to allow for higher-end condos. E-staklish design standards for all new construction compatihle with the Marine Terminal and Osprey Pointe themes. ii) begin negotiations for a 15N jF/jacagawea Trail underpass. Prepare a "plan b" "floating deck" option for the trail to drop into and floats on the River, if necessary. iii) begin plans for continuation of the 5acagawea Trail through the neighborhood. iv) begin plans for a public beach separated from the boat launch facility. V) (Jpgrade dike and park facility. vi) Add path and view deck at harbor entrance of dike. Page 92 of 1 15 Long-Term Recommendations: vii) build 5acagawea Trail underpass and tram through the boat basin neighborhood. viii build a beach and swimming area as part of 5cklagel ParL, separating koat launch uses from swimming. ix) (Jpgrade boat launch and dock facilities. x) build a park along the River between the basin and Osprey Pointe,P. thematically connecting the two developm xi� Consider the possibility of a cantile pedest i idge built to the side of the 5N5F kridge 1J I>n r s. 9 3,n A,- LA4,ij c H C1Gt�t OF a, IMPzc)"v* f I Page 95 of i i 3 Boat Basin ` Segment - N - 7 imp% .. o 100 aoo aoo aoo smo .* AQ • • •, A d N w w E S C} SCh G-EU DIRK j C7 r Boat Basin _ Amenities Legerrii Access PNM k 1-1.1 c Marker ® Restroam 13—h fl Parking Area SAGAGAWEA_TRAL l°.–"J', Beer ieurarlr El Pier SaoKpoiw Trill Propow l Page 94 of i 1 3 =-EM `!' �•�"'art. ■ 0 w�rd�� s_• ' ._- - Port of Pasco a) Ownership: Port of Pasco b) Landscape & Natural Features:gently sloping to increased slope, scrub vegetation with thick tree growth along river edge (NOTE.—Trees have recently keen thinned around the Osprey Pointe development to the west. C) Transportation: The port of Pasco is a huk of industrial Klver, rail, and truck transportation.The Port owns a karge docking and loading facility on the Columkia Jiver, which leads out to the Pacific and to markets in the Pacific Kim and beyond. This karge facility is located just east of the Osprey Pointe development. Several rail-spurs access the E)N,517 main lines through the Port from koth the northwest and northeast. Ainsworth and Oregon Avenues provide quick access for trucking to major highways heading in all directions. The Trail has keen developed through the Port property; along the river of the Osprey Pointe area and then inland along Ainsworth Avenue to the last klock of warehouses, and then kack south to the river. The Trail ends at the,5acagawea jtate Park access road. J) General Land Use Pattern: The Port of Pasco has a mix of WWII-era warehouse facilities and vacant lands, and is zoned for heavy industrial use, thought Osprey Pointe is planned as a higher-end kusiness park. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: The completion of the first Osprey Pointe kuilding (the Port of Pasco office) and utilities infrastructure has set the stage for further office development in the park. The Port has designed the kuilding as an example of the design standards expected of future buildings on the site. Landscaping (including the removal of dead trees and undergrowth along the Jiver) is professional and aesthetically pleasing, as well as drought-resistant. The rest of the Port will remain heavy industrial into the foreseeakle future. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Trail location is constrained by industrial uses in the area. The Trail currently follows Ainsworth Avenue through the heaviest industrial use areas, leaving the river to avoid the karge loading facility and some outdoor warehousing. One river view access trail weaves ketween some outdoor storage areas down to the }liver, kut does not 5u6sequentlyjoin up with the Trail. Page 96 of 1 15 g) Kr—COMMENDATION5: (see Port of Pasco Osprey Pointe 51-1s11'Ie55 Parr Plan). Short-Term Recommendations: 1) Continue development of Osprey Pointe as planned. ii) Connect Lookout Point tram to main Tram along the River. iii) Provide self-guided smart Phone tours addressing unique history, culture and environment of the Port of Pasco; Highlight big Pasco's working Port and businesses as a tram exhibit Long--Term Recommendations: iv) ff)uild a Park along the River between the 5oat 5asin and Osprey Pointe, thematically connecting the two developments. v) Fjuild an improved trail connection between Pasco's urban center and the Osprey Pointe F)usiness ParL. Page 97 of 1 13 A' >• I ,p Port of Pasco Segment J N W E 4� S 0 Ed7®00 ^..� F M w E S , Port of Pasco Amenities � Legend � Pecs ss 1-1 IrRarpr t-Mark— ® Pirr Upl.M Lmkrgr + hence resk a Rant— Secag—.Tree F�p,+. Pot.0.1 HOW A.. ® ,,—QAI" • VIEW_POINT Sxxg—Trad Prep .4 L� 'a Hist—Mauer T.Ile PI UDwkaPuMcy _. Pale 98 of i 1 3 1= Proposed Port of Pasco Legend ragc of 0 o jacagawea Park a) Ownership:Army Corps of Engineers/Washjt Parks & Recreation b) Landscape & Natural Features: 5tate park; mostly flat, mix of native and non- native (parQ vegetation; beach areas; docks; boat launch; historic Ainsworth Town site. c) Transportation:Access to the Park is limited to a single two-lane road entering the park from the northwest. The Trail ends at this road. An undeveloped path/road meanders through the historic Ainsworth town site. J) General Land Use Pattern: This area is partially developed as a state park with patron amenities such as parking, family and group picnic areas, a koat launch and docks, and a beach. There is housing for park staff and a museum/interpretive center. The balance of the park is vacant, with the exception of some high voltage- power lines utilities crossing the Columbia River at the south shore. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: 5acagawea5tate Park is partially developed and contains the only developed peach within Pasco city limits. This park rests at the confluence of the jnake and Columbia Rivers and is historic for its role in the Lewis and Clark L,xpedition, and contains a museum and interpretive center. The park is periodically used for sternwheeler riverboat docking as they come up river from the Pacific coast. While this may ke an ideal site for summer food vending, any commercial activity would need to he sanctioned ky the jtate Parks ]department. The Park isjust south of the historic Ainsworth town site, and the only public access to the site. Thejacagawea Trail should continue through the park along the north border of the access road and developed park areas, continuing along the meandering Ainsworth access road, and then north up along the Snake River. Many areas of the park are ideal for local camping and scouting/wilderness club-type activities. The balance of the park area is undeveloped and amenable to wildlife viewing. Future development should allow for a few "look but don't touch" viewing trails in appropriate parts of the park. 0 Linkage and Amenities Constraints: because the park is owned and operated by the State Parks }department, the City of Pasco has limited influence over its development. As well, the Ainsworth town site is an historic site and may he difficult Page 100 of 1 15 to protect as an archaeological site, off-limits to scavenging. The northeast part of the old town site is swampy and any tram through the area may require footkridges or boardwalLs to cross over the swamp areas. g) KE-COMMENDATION5: (sate of Washington Parks Department); Short-Term Kecommendations: 1) Place drinLing fountains, shade trees, and restroom facilities at strategic points; ii) Develop overnight camping areas throughout the park iii) Design a tram extension of the 5acagawea Tram through the Ainsworth Town site and beyond. iv) Develop trams in 5acajawea State Park for opportunities to learn akout native Wildlife,geological features and the Confluence Project V) Consider more summer fairs and activities and related food vendor opportunities Long--Term Kecommendations: vi) Develop thejacagawea Heritage Tram through park and towards the Columbia Plateau/Ice Harkor Dam tram linLage; AL r 4: ,f $6 Page 101 of 1 15 J r ,.. �• s i b; Sacagawea Park } Segment ."Ys 0 100 600 400 1200 F. Y N 5 SacSeg ea Park Segment =' Page 102 of 1 15 l• I' N yy E s Sacagawea Park Proposed Legand S2cag-u Troll y Ac[:ess Phial - Sacag—Trail Proposed Upland Linkage PolemBal Hahim Araa Parks Parlang Area Re�lwoad '� �ry�� a 54��7: Page 1 03 of 1 1 3 Y � t 0 IT 1 Page 104 of 1 1 3 tr^ 'J, Building U do Nature- f F..arfv inhabitants along the Snake and Columbia rivers lived in lodges _. constrtrcted of isaod and covered with we mats. Woad far frames was seance in the days when sage and willonw dominated the river shorn and no trees grew an the acid plains. Natisv Americans ironsport"tl the poles from forested areas on the distant hills,or collected them as drlflwoad. In recent times,Columbia River dams and irrigation systems allow tall trees am green grass to flourish in the owe-arid landseape t - 4 Holice - kelp preserve the past far- the future. ; Disturbance or removal of y artifacts is prohibited. �1 Violators are subject to � fine and imprisonment. iN IRS r Ainsworth Town a) Ownership: U5 Government b) Landscape & Natural Features: steep slope areas, bN5F R-O-W with trestle bridge; overgrown with mostly non-native vegetation, salt deposits and marsh/swamp areas c) Transportation: There are no direct public access points to this point. An undeveloped, meandering path extends north from 5acagawca 5tatc Park to the site. J) General Land Use Pattern: Vacant with an undeveloped archaeological site from the former Town of Ainsworth. e) Linkage and Amenities OPPortunities: The Ainsworth Town site could he developed as an historic site. The undeveloped path which winds through the site could easily kc developed into an extension of the jacagawea Trail as it converges with the Columkia Plateau trail along the Snake }liver. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Much of the proposed Trail path Iles in Railroad right-of-way. Any trail development would ke dependent upon vacation of existing rail uses and cooperation of the railroad. g) Kr-COMMr-NDATION5: h) Short-Term Recommendations: i) begin conversations with the jtate Park jervicc and FW517 Railroad. ii) Plan and design ajacagawea Heritage Trail extension through the Ainsworth Town site. i) Long--Term Recommendations: 1) continue Sacagawea path towards Ice Harbor Dam trail Iinkage; ii) place drinking fountains, shade trees, and restroom facilities at strategic points; iii) Develop Town of Ainsworth archaeology site iv) Consider the possibility of a cantilevered pedestrian kridge built to the side of the P)N5r bridge Page 107 of 1 15 r� r. N r� N J' `,� 'ter .:�•_ r Ainsworth Town yf �." Ainsworth Town Segment Segment c'•,' Legand r 'Y i.` I �.11� 9wOLauach ® Parking Area Pg&WjalH bd.t Area Rler 4n S ♦ ❑ 100 7❑O 309 4.00 500 Saco�awe 7 Rra;aaea 3he0.er faa9 7W �J L x ,, a/ i . r♦ ♦ i ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ • • r r O 0 .r N v+ W E s Ainsworth Town Proposed Legend 13 S—g-7,..'il Popp—d r Potential Hl bftalA— Parinng Nen l� r Parks Rail—I TidewaterTerminal a) Ownership: P)NSF Railwac�/Tidewater Terminal Compan�/Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission. 6) Landscape & Natural Features: Steep slope; M517 R-O-W ; industrial uses; US-12 highway and bridge C) Transportation: There are no public access points to any portion of this segment. Plans are being considered to connect Sacajawea State Parl< with the Columbia Plateau Trail (CPT) Currently two existing, off-site fuel tank farms prevent a direct link between CPT and the park. While the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission owns the former ff)N5r Railroad ROWjust north of the Tidewater terminal, the Southern part of CPT to Ice Harbor has yet to lie developed and the trail still has railroad tracks and is used for railcar storage. The Washington State Department of Transportation (W5DOT) is scoping a project to build an interchange over highway i 2. The current W5DOT plans include a bridge wide enough to include a bike lane. One potentially indentified route would follow Sacajawea Park Road up to the bridge and a route would have to be identified to connect from the bridge to the Southern end of the Trail. J) General Land (Jse Pattern: this area is developed with two fuel storage tank facilities, with the balance of the land being vacant. e) Linkage and Amenities Opportunities: Plans are being considered to connect Sacajawea State Park with the Columbia Plateau Trail (CPT). The Washington State Parl<s and Recreation Commission owns the former 5N5F Railroad ROW just north of the Tidewater terminal. W5DOT is scoping a project to connect Sacajawea Park to the CPT via Sacajawea Park Road up to an interchange over highway 1 2, including a bridge wide enough to include a bike lane. f) Linkage and Amenities Constraints: Two off-site fuel tank farms prevent a direct link between the Columbia Plateau Trail and the park. While the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission owns the former 5N5F Railroad ROW just north of the Tidewater terminal, the Southern part of CPT to Ice [- arbor has yet to be developed and the trail still has railroad tracks and is used for railcar storage. Page 1 1 0 of 1 1 3 g) RECOMMENDATIONS: Long--Term Kecommendations: i) Continue the 5acagawea Trai l/Columbia Plateau Tram towards the Columbia Plateau/Ice Harbor Dam tram linkage; ii) Install JnAing fountains, shade trees, and restroom facilities at strategic points; iii) Consider the possibility of a cantilevered pedestrian bridge bunt to the side of the ff)N5I=kridgc AIA I w h 4y E Page i l i of 1 1 3 - ��J � - � ~ � ��)6��: - � ■ «.C� ` » � y � � �� • CA EL\ ) o CL § L =a . ^a � { � $ ) _ 2-4 5�1-® ■ � ~ » . rage 112 o 113