HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010.04.26 Council Workshop Packet AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. April 26,2010
1. CALI,TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance.
3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:
4. 1TFMS FOR DISCUSSION:
(a) Staff Presentation: Facilities. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA)
Presented by Dan Dotta,Facilities Services Manager.
(b) Parks & Recreation Advisory Council Interviews:
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield,City Manager dated April 22, 2010.
2. Applications(3) (Council packets only).
(c) Franklin County Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan 2010:
1. Agenda Report from Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director dated
April 20, 2010.
2. lnterlocal Agreement for establishing an Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan for
Franklin County (July 2007).
3. Draft Franklin County hntegrated Solid Waste Management Plan (Council packets only;
copy available for public review in the Planning office, the Pasco Library or on the city's
webpage at htip:)/www.Masco-wa.govlwebadrla/cit .council pe�rts ,
(d) Utility Rate Adjustments:
1. Agenda Report from Stan Strebel,Deputy City Manager dated April 22, 2010,
2. Proposed Ordinance,
3, Water, Sewer Fund Analysis.
(e) Signature Authority for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP):
1. Agenda Report from Angela Pitman, Block Grant Administrator dated April 20, 2010.
2. Resolution.
(f) Signature Authority for the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP):
1. Agenda Report from Angela Pitman,Block Grant Administrator dated April 20,2010.
2. Resolution.
5. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
6. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
7. ADJOURNMENT
REMINDERS:
L 4;00 p.m., Monday, April 26, Port of Benton — Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Committee
Meeting. (MAYOR PRO-TEM MATT WATKINS,Rep.;COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Alt.)
2. 6:00 p.m., Monday, April 26, Conference Room ##1 — Old Fire Pension Board Meeting.
(COUNCILMEMBER REBECCA FRANCIK)
3. 4:00 p.m., Wednesday, April 28, 710 W. Court Street— Franklin County Affordable Housing Trust Fund
Oversight Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBERS REBECCA FRANCIK and MIKE GARRISON)
4. 5:30 p.m., Thursday, April 29, 710 W. Court Street — Benton-Franklin Community Action Committee
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK,Alt.)
5. 7:30 a.m., Friday, April 30, Richland City Council Chambers —Hanford Communities Governing Board
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON, Rep.; At,YENNEY,Alt.)
6. 5:00 p.m., Friday, April 30, TRAC Facility— Hispanic Academic Achiever's Program. (MAYOR PRO-
TEM MATT WATKINS)
7. 11:00 a.m., Saturday, May 1, Downtown Pasco — Cinco de Mayo Parade (staging at 2nd & Columbia
Streets at 9:00 a.m.). (MAYOR PRO-TEM MATT WATKINS, COUNCILMEMBERS BOB
HOFFMANN and AL YENNEY)
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Counci. April 22, 2010
FROM: Gary Crutch i Manager Workshop Mtg.: 4/26/10
SUBJECT: Parks and Recr ation Advisory Council Interviews
I_ REFERENCE(S):
1. Applications (3) (Council packets only)
11. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
4/26: Council to conduct brief interviews with Abigail Kidd, Brigitte Miller and
Daniel Patton.
I11. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The Parks and Recreation Advisory Council is composed of seven members; terms
are three years. The board meets on the 1 st Thursday of every month at 5:30 p.m.
B) The Parks and Recreation Advisory Council advises the City Council on recreation
activities and facilities needed in the community.
C) There are three positions whose term has expired:
I. :Position No. 4 (currently Duane Taber)
2. Position No. 6 (currently Michael Mathews)
3. Position No. 7 (vacant)
D) The Council screening committee concluded that the incumbents in Position Nos. 4
and 6 be reappointed without interview.
E) After Council Screening Committee review of all applications, the following have
been selected to interview for possible appointment to Position No. 7:
1 , Abigail Kidd--------------------------------------------- ----3418 Emerald Downs Lane
2. Brigitte Miller............................................................5316 Bakerloo Lane
3. Daniel Patton..............................................................7807 Vendovi. Drive
IV. DISCUSSION:
A) After conduct of interviews at the April 26 Workshop meeting, it is proposed that
appropriate appointments be made by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the
Council, at the May 3 meeting.
4(b)
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 20, 2010
TO: Gary Crutchfi 1 Manager Workshop Mtg.: 04/26/10
FROM: Rick White, Co rnunity and Economic Development Director '0\4
SUBJECT: Franklin County Tnte t.ated Solid Waste Management Plan 2010
1. REFERENCE(S):
1. Interlocal Agreement for establishing an Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan for
Franklin County(July 2007).
2. Draft Franklin County Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan (Council packets only;
copy available for public review in the Planning office, the Pasco Library or on the City's
webpage at bttp://www.pA.sco--�,a..Zo-,li",Atebapp/cit%,-counCilreRorts).
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
04/26: DISCUSSION: Presentation by HD'R Engineering, for Council discussion.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact is contingent upon the receipt of State grants over the next several years and the
implementation of an interlocal agreement specifying solid waste activities and funding. There is
a potential impact of approximately $87,000 from 2011 through 2015.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. Solid waste planning activities are required through State law. The 2010 Franklin County
Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan (Plan) was developed in response to
Washington and Oregon legislation.
B. Each county, in cooperation with the cities within the county, is required to prepare a
solid waste management plan. The solid waste planning effort began with an interlocal
agreement between the cities of Pasco, Connell, Kahlotus and Mesa and with Franklin
County. The agreement established Franklin County as the lead planning agency.
C. The implementation of required activities is contingent upon distribution of financial
grants through the Department of Ecology (DOE). Receipt of the grant requires a 25%
local match.
D. Currently, the local match is being paid through a surcharge Franklin County imposes on
unincorporated Basin Disposal (BDI) accounts. The Plan proposes a formula for funding
the local match based on the percentage of each jurisdiction's population to the entire
County's population. The Plan also proposes that in 2010 and 2011, the County pay 50%
of the required local match through the surcharge, and each city collectively pay the
remaining 50% of the match in proportiou to its population (for example - Pasco at. 80%,
and Connell at 5%). In 2012 and 2013 the proposed formula would repeat except the
County payment would drop to 25% of the local match. In 2014 and beyond, the cities
and County would pay the required local match per their proportional share of the entire
County population.
E. The plan has been submitted to the Department of Ecology, the Solid Waste Advisory
Committee (SWAC), the county and cities and the public for review. The SWAC
(including Councilmen Garrison and Larson) has recommended that the Plan be adopted.
V. DISCUSSION:
A. Adoption of the Plan will guide solid waste activities for the next 6 years.
Implementation of any item in the Plan is dependent upon receipt of State funding (DOE
grants) and the approval of an accompanying interlocal agreement.
4(c)
Reference #1
466
VVMN RECORDED RETL"RN TO:
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
REGARDING ADOPTION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR FRANKLIN COUNTY
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is executed by and between Franklin County
("County") and the Cities of Pasco, Connell, Mesa and Kahlotus ("Cities") (hereinafter jointly
referred to as the "Parties") for the purposes of establishing an Integrated solid waste
management plan for Franklin County; fulfilling the Cities and County's obligations under
Chapter 70.95 RCW, and other State and Federal laws and regulations governing solid waste
management; and contributing to the health and safety of all Franklin County residents. The
Parties make and enter into this Interlocal Agreement("AgreemenL") effective the day of
2007, for the purposes and under the terms contained herein.
WHEREA.S, the Parties recognize the need and obligation to meet Federal and State
inandates for solid waste management planning; and
WHEREAS, the Parties believe that the Integrated Solid Waste Martagemenz Plan
("Plan") can best be accomplished under the leadership of Franklin County in cooperation with
the Cities; and
WHEREAS, programs of solid waste reduction and recycling can be most effective
when carried out pursuant to a coordinated Plan; and
WHEREAS, the County has secured adequate grant funding to meet the financial
obligations for solid waste planning as required by law, and
WHEREAS, the Parties are authorized and empowered to enter into this Agreement
pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW, NOW, THEREFORE,
IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual promises and covenant he-rein, it is hereby agreed.
Interlocal Agreement
Adoption of Solid Waste Management Plan- 1
pp s
4 6b S
I. PURPOSE
T !
This Agreement is entered into pursu= to Chapter 3934 RCW for the purpose of
cooperative management of solid waste within Franklin County. It is the intent of the Parties to
work cooperatively in developing a comprehensive solid waste management plan pursuant of
Chapter 70.95 and 70.105 RCW that is viable and economically responsible to their citizens.
Specifically, this Agreement will provide for the administration, planning and operations of the
adopted Franklin County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Program.
It. DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this Agreement and any related agreement, contracts and documents
executed, adopted, or approved to this Agreement, the parties shall use the definitions found in
RCW 70.95.030, RCW 70.138.020, WAC 173-304-100 and WAC 173-350-100, tinless the
context indicates otherwise.
III. RESPONSWILY11LS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY
The responsibilities of Franklin County shall be.
A. Prepare and submit for approval on behalf of the Cities and County the Integrated
Solid Waste Management Plan (ISWIvfP) as provided in RCW 70.95.080 and related provision E
of law. Such Plan as finally prepared, amended or modified shall be binding upon the Parties in
its solid waste management.
B. Implement, in cooperation with the Cities, waste reduction and recycling
programs within such Cities, as well as in uninwrporated areas, all as enumerated in the Plan.
Where appropriate and agreed, the County may provide funding to the Cities to implement such
waste reduction and recycling programs.
IV. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIES
The responsibilities of the Cities shall be:
A. Cooperatively help prepare the Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan
(ISWM-P) for Franklin County by participating in the Franklin County Solid Waste Advisory
Committee (FCS WAC).
8. Review draft plan and respond for your city with comments to be adopted into the
Plan prior to formal FCSWAC recommendations.
i
C. Any recommendation in the Plan, which would result in a cost to any
governmental entity shall be pre-approved by the local government before presentation to the
County Commission for adoption into the Plan.
Interlocal Agreement
Adoption of Solid Waste Management Plan-2
t
i
E
p
' E
D. Where appropriate and agreed, receive funding from the County to implement
such waste reduction and recycling programs as outlined in the ISWIV2.
t
;
V. DISBURSEMENT OF ASSETS AND DEBTS _.
r
If this Agreement is terminated, all Parties to this Agreement shall determine the
disbursement of any outstanding debts and the allocation of any assets. If the Parties cannot
agree to the disbursement of any outstanding debts and the allocation of any assets,the issues are
to be submitted for arbitration, pursuant to State law, RCW 7.04A. The County and the
contesting jurisdiction agree that such arbitration shall he conducted before one (1) disinterested €
arbitrator. i
VT. DURATION
This Agreement shall commence on the date set forth above and will continue in effect
for six (6) years. As stipulated within RCW 70.95.110(1), each Plan shall be maintained in a
current condition and reviewed and revised periodically as may be required by the W.DoE. Upon
each review, such plans shall be extended to show long-range needs for solid waste handling
facilities for twenty (20) years in the future, and a reviewed implementation schedule and
implementation budget for six (6) years in the future. This Agreement may be earlier terminated
by mutual agreement or by any party upon sixty(60)days advance written notice. {
VII. INTERLOCAL COOPERATION ACT PROVISIONS
9
Each party shall be solely responsible for all costs, materials, supplies and services
necessary for their performance under the terms of this Agreement. All property and materials
secured by each party in the performance of this Agreement shall remain the sole property of that
party. All funding incident to the fulfillment of this Interlocal Agreement, shall be borne by each
party necessary for the fulfillment of their responsibilities under the terms of this Agreement. No v
special budcets or funds are anticipated, nor shall be created incident to this Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement. it is not the intention that a separate legal entity be established to '
conduct the cooperative undertakings, nor is the acquisition, holding, or disposing of any real or
personal property anticipated under the terms of this Agreement. The Franklin County
Administrator, or his designee, shall be designated as the Administrator of this Interlocal
Cooperative Agreement.
s
A copy of this Agreement, shall be filed with the Franklin County Auditor; provided, €
however,that failure to isle shall not affect the validity of this Agreement. j
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement by duly
authorized officers on the day and year first written above.
i
Interlocal Agreement
Adoption of Solid Waste Mir-agement Plan-3
0 8 466
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FRANIKLIN TY, WASHINGTON
Rob Koch, Chainii
Rick Miller, Member
'NcfZ-J. &-rk;y7rTMFFIn Pro-Tens
Attest: Approved as to Fonn.-
Mary wi9drs RyanY.Ve?hulp
Clerk of the Board for Franklin County Chief Civil Deputy Prosecutor
C1;TYF PASCO,WASE[INGTON
Joy Mayor
Jo 0 n, ayor
test; Approved 0 nil:
0
Clark, Ciy rleik Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
CITY OF CONNELL,WASHINGTON
Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form:
City Clerk City Attorney
CITY OF MESA,WASHINGTON
Mayor
At-test: Approved as to Form:
City Clerk City Attorney
Interlocal Agreement
Adoption nf'Solid Waste Management Plan.4
I
� 1
FRANKLEY COUNTY RESOLUTION tiro.
BEFORE THF, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Off' FRANKLIN COUNTY
WASHINGTON
RE: AGREEMENT BETWEEN FRANKLIN COUNTY SOLID WASTE AND
THE CITY OF PASCO
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.01.010 and RCW 36.32.120 the legislative authority of each
county is authorized to enter into contracts on behalf of the County and have the care of County
property and management of Count' funds and business; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Franklin Cotiinty Commissioners constitutes the legislative authority Of
Franklin County and desires to enter into the attached agreement as being in the best interest of
Franklin County,
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the attached ab eement between Franklin County
Soid Waste and the City of Pasco, is hereby approved by the Board,
APPROVED this =Z_ day of 1;o%ember; 2008.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Robet-t E. Koch, Chair
Rick M' Chair Pro Tern
i
"'N 6-a Corkru ember
Attest:
Clerk ofc e Board
t
i
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 22, 2010
TO: Gary Crutch :.t -Manager Workshop Mtg.: 4/26/10
Regular Mtg.: 513110
FROM: Stan Strebel, eputy Cry er
SUBJECT: Utility Rate Adjustments
1. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Ordinance
2. Water, Sewer Fund Analysis
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
4126: Discussion
5/3: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , providing for adjustments to
water and sewer utility rates effective July 1, 2010, and to irrigation
rates effective January 1, 2011, and amending Chapter 3.07 of the
Pasco Municipal Code regarding utility rates and, further, to
authorize publication by suininary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
(Water, Sewer, Utility Tax)
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) In preparation for the issuance of S6 million of water and sewer revenue bonds to
pay for a portion of the new water treatment plant ($3 million), and the second
clarifier at the sewer plant and other sewer projects ($3 million), staff has
prepared an analysis of the projected revenues and expenses for the water and
sewer fund over the next several years.
B) The analysis suggests that while the sewer fund is relatively healthy, the water
fund will shortly be lacking the resources necessary to cover operating expenses,
meet debt service obligations and accomplish smaller, but necessary capital
projects. Additionally, the irrigation fund is in a negative cash situation owing to
significant improvements that have been made over the last few years. The
attached analysis sheets illustrate the effect of the proposed rate changes suggested
below.
C) Staff recommends a water service rate increase composed of two parts. First, the
monthly residential base fee (314" meter) be increased by $2.00 to $12.50 (19 1/'r));
second, the consumption rate be increased from 54¢, to 65¢/hundred cubic feet
(cf) (2.0.3%). Non-residential base and consumption rates would be increased by
like percentages. The two adjustments, combined, are expected to generate an
additional $996,700/yr; sufficient to cover the projected combination of
operational and debt service expenses. The typical resident would realize an
increase in monthly water rate charges of$3.10.
4(d)
D) Fortunately, continued growth in sewer revenues, with monthly static expenses,
offers the opportunity to offset part of the water rate increase to the typical
homeowner. Given current projections, staff recommends the monthly residential
sewer fee be reduced by$1.53 and other user classes by a commensurate 5%. The
effect of this change will reduce the combined impact to a typical resident to
$1.57/month. See the table below for a comparison of current and proposed fees
for a typical single family home on a monthly basis:
CURRENT PROPOSED
Water Base $10.50 $12.50
Water Consumption $5.40 $6.50
1,000 cl
Sewer 527.53 $26.00
TOTAL $43.43 $45.00
E) With the proposed rate adjustments, the City's overall utility rates would still
compare favorably to those of neighboring cities as shown below;
PASCO RICHLAND KENNEWICK
Water $19.00 $30.20 $19,89
Sewer $26.00 $2535 ' $19.24
TOTAL $45.00 $55.55 $39.13
F) Irrigation water rates were reduced from $32.00 to $24.00 per month in 2004.
The system has undergone considerable growth and improvements over the last
several years and growth has paid for most of the improvements. In order to
replace the irrigation fund into a positive cash position, a $2.00 per month
increase (9.3%) to $26.00 is recommended. Irrigation charges apply from April
through October. In order to limit the impact on homeowners for this year, it is
recommended that this increase become effective January 1, 2011.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Water base rates were last increased by 4% in 2003 and 2004 following the
completion of a utility rate study. Sewer rates were increased by 2% in each of
those years. Sewer Rates (excluding the liotel/hotel rate) were reduced by 10%
beginning in 2007.
B) It should be noted that the last water rate adjustment occurred in 2004. Had the
water base and consumption rate been adjusted each year for inflation (CPI), the
current monthly cost would be $18.31 (a 15.2% increase over $15.90) and slightly
lower than the $19.00 that will result from this recommendation. Having delayed
those adjustments until truly needed (2010), ratepayers have paid the least
possible for quality water service over the past six years.
C) In terns of actual dollars (not percentages) the combined monthly expense for a
typical residence in 2004 was $46.90. After the proposed adjustments to both
water and sewer, the same resident would pay$45.00 monthly,
D) Staff recommends approval of the water and sewer rate adjustments effective July
1, 2010.
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, amending Pasco Municipal Code
Sections 3.07.160 (Water User Fees), 3.07.170 (Sewer User Fees) and 3.07.210
(Irrigation Water Utility) regarding utility rates.
WHEREAS, The City Council has determined that certain amendments to the Water,
Sewer and Irrigation user fees are needed;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, Does Ordain
as Follows:
Section 1. PMC Section 3.07.160, subsections A), B) and C) are amended to read as
follows:
3.07.164 WATER USER FEES:
A) Inside City: Fee/C are Reference
1) Consumption—per 100 cubic foot $044$0.65 13.20.050
2) Bulk—per 1000 gallons S@-.7-5 $0.90 13.20.070
B) Residential—single family base fees; Effective Dates:
1/1/04 7/1/10
1) 314 and 5/8 inch— per month P0.50 $12.50 13.20,020
2) 1 inch—per month $i 5.75 $18.74 13,20.020
3) Outside City; effective 1 1/1/02 90% surcharge 13.20,080
Sr. Citizen/Low Income:
4) 3/4 and 5/8 inch — per month 83.59 $4.17 13.20.040
5) 1 inch— per month S55 $6.25 13.20.040
6) Outside City; effective 1 111102 90% surcharge
C) Commercial —multi-family, irrigation,
commercial base fees;
1) 3/4 inch—per month $-14.9 $17.61 13.20.030
2) 1 inch —per month Pi.37 $25.43 13.20.030
3) 1-1/2 inch — per month 941.69 $49.61 13.20.030
4) 2 inch—per month $66.88 $79.59 13.20.030
5) 3 inch— per month $91.34 $108.69 13.20.030
6) 4 inch— per month $131.60 $156.60 13.20.030
7) 6 inch — per month $205.43 $244.46 13.20.030
8) 8 inch—per month $294A9 $338.77 13.20.080
9) Outside City; effective 1 l/1/02 90% surcharge
Section 2. FMC Section 3,07.170 subsection A) is amended to read as follows:
3.07.170 SEWER USE FEES:
A) Residential and Commercial Base Fee Fee/Charge Reference
Effective 7/1110
1) Residential:
a) 1-4 Units—per month $27.53 $26.00 13.40.020
b) 5 and over— per month $22.05 $20.95 13.40.020
c) Outside City 50% surcharge 13.40.060
d) Consumption None
Sr. Citizen/Low Income:
a) Single Dwelling Unit $9.48 $8.72 13.40,050
b) Outside City 50% surcharge 13.40.060
2) Commercial
a) Base Fee: per month $36.79 $34.95 13.40.040
b) Consumption per 100 cubic feet over 1000 $1.29 13.40.040
cubic feet
3) Hotel/Motel:
a) Base Fee: per unit/per month $640 $5.51 13.40.030
b) Consumption per 100 cubic feet over 1000 $1.29 13.40.040
cubic feet
c) Outside City 50% surcharge 13.40.060
Section 3. PMC Section 3.07,210 subsections A) and D) are amended to read as
i'ollows:
3.07.210 IRRIGATION 'WATER UTILITY
A) Irrigation water service; monthly rate, during Fee/Charge Reference
irrigation season: Effective Dates
4/1/04 1/1111
1) Base rate, per unit, for single family residential $24.00 $26.00 13.61.190(A)
properties
2) Base rate,per unit, for non-single family $24,00 $26.00 13.61.190(B)
residential property
3) Per irrigation unit $ 59 $8.12 13.61.190(C)
4) Per irrigated acre (public parks, playgrounds and $70.09 $75.81 13.61.190(D)
open spaces)
B) Unauthorized turn-on (any repair cost additional) $50.00 13.61.090
C) Discoruiect"Connect Service due to violation $50.00 13.61.100
D) Annual System Availability fee $82-00 $88.80 13.61.060
Ordinance Amending PMC 3,07.160, 3,07.170 and 3.07.2 10
Page 2
I
Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after July 1, 2010
after passage and publication, as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular meeting the 3rd day of
May, 2010.
Matt Watkins, Mayor Pro-Tem
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Ordinance Amending PMC 3.07.1 b0, 3.07.170 and 3.07.2.10
Page 3
WATER
Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 6,687,079 7,162,625 7,680,100 7,822,296 7,966,616 8,113,159 8,252,976
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 4,492,167 4,932,843 5,178,583 5,351,613 5,532,061 5,720,266 5,916,585
NET INCOME 2,194,912 2,229,783 2,501,517 2,470.683 2,434,555 2,392,893 2,336,391
TOTAL CAP OUTLAYS 7,223,814 8,675,000 820,000 824,000 820,000 820,000 820,000
LESS; OUTSIDE FUNDING SOURCES 9,941,061 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 0
DEBT SERVICE 1,223,826 1,691,772 1,822,875 1,818,986 1,809,187 2,042,487 2,042,487
TRANSFERS OUT 35,215 28,238 28,238 28,238 28,238 28,238 28,238
BEGINNING CASH RESERVES 2,399,549 6,087,883 950,893 809,535 641,232 446,599 -22,995
ENDING CASH RESERVES 6,087,883 950,893 809,535 641,232 446,599 -22,995 -549,091
NET INCOME FOR DEBT SERVICE REQT 3,163,394 3,447,907 3,781,093 3,762,826 3,739,537 3,710,993 3,667,894
NET INCOME AFTER DEBT SERVICE 1,939,569 1,756,135 1,958,218 1,943,839 1,930,350 1,668,506 1,625,407
DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE RATIO 2.58% 2.04% 2.070/6 2.070A 2.07% 1.82% 1.800/.
Assume 2010 operating revenues increase by$498K
Assume 2011 operating revenues at 102% 2010 plus$498K
2012 and beyond, prior year plus 2%
SEINER
Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 7,609,737 7,450,914 7,651,997 7,761,470 7,965,454 8,187,605 8,417,328
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 3,592,312 4,202,252 3,842,046 3,990,636 4,145,594 4,307,208 4,475,778
NET INCOME 41017,425 3,248,662 3,809,950 3,770,834 3,819,660 3,880,397 3,941,550
CAPITAL OUTLAYS 1,520,250 2,120,000 3,050,000 770,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
LESS: OUTSIDE FUNDING SOURCES 369,606 3,367,646 355,244 240,301 227,800 227,300 227,300
DEBT SERVICE 2,430,006 2,546,067 2,648,601 2,532,520 2,509,600 2,509,100 2,509,100
TRANSFERS-OUT 1,127,996 288,000 300,000 312,000 324,000 336,000 336,000
BEGINNING CASH RESERVES 1,184,249 493,028 2,155,270 321,863 718,477 1,432,537 2,195,134
ENDING CASH RESERVES 493,028 2,155,270 321,863 718,477 1,432,537 2,195,134 3,018,884
NET INC. FOR DEBT SERV. COVERAGE 4,703,056 3,897,823 4,471,012 4,447,913 4,513,428 4,590,938 4,669,563
NET INCOME AFTER DEBT SERV. 2,273,050 1,351,756 1,822,411 1,915,393 2,003,828 2,081,838 2,160,463
DEBT SERV COVERAGE RATIO 1.94% 1.53% 1.69% 1.76% 1.80% 1.83% 1.86%
Assume 2010 operating revenues decrease by $152.5K
Assume 2011 operating revenues at 103% 2010 less $152,5K
2012 and beyond, prior year plus 3% -
IRRIGATION
Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
TOTAL SOURCES OF FUNDS 721,553 1,238,428 850,193 885,424 920,972 956,812 992,910
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 598,069 681,517 713,050 740,245 768,501 797,870 828,401
NET INCOME 123,484 556,911 137,142 145,179 152,470 158,942 164,509
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAYS 392,843 180,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
LESS: OUTSIDE FUNDING SOURCES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DEBT SERVICE 67,944 67,785 66,366 66,477 66,477 66,477 66,477
TRANSFERS OUT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BEGINNING CASH RESERVE -102,005 -439,308 -130,182 -159,405 -180,703 -194,709 -202,245
ENDING CASH RESERVE -439,308 -130,182 -159,405 • -180,703 -194,709 -202,245 -204,212
NET INCOME FOR DEBT SERVICE REQT 185,025 621,171 209,851 220,982 231,367 240,933 249,594
NET INCOME.AFTER DEBT SERVICE 115,025 551,171 139,851 150,982 161,367 170,933 179,594
DEBT SERVICE COVERAGE RATIO 2.64% 8.87% 3.00% 3.16% 3.31% 3.44% 3.57%
Assumes 2011 Irrigation Rate @ 26/mo
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 20, 2010
TO: Gary Crutchfield, 'Inager Workshop Mtg.: 4/26/10
Rick White,' f Regular Mtg.: 5/3/10
Community& Eco comic Development Director
FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator
SUBJECT: Signature Authority for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP)
I. REFERENCE(S):
A. Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
4/26: DISCUSSION
5/3: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution authorizing the city
manager to execute all documents related to the acquisition,
rehabilitation and resale of real properties for the Neighborhood
Stabilization Program.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
$379,704 in federal NSP funds.
IV. HIS'T'ORY AND FACTS BIUEF:
A. The NSP is a federal Block Grant program aimed at minimizing the effects of
foreclosures on communities. In February 2009, the City entered into a contract
with Washington State Department of Commerce for the administration and
implementation of the NSP Plan. The Housing and Urban Development
Department (HUD) recently accelerated the deadline for obligating hands from
March 19, 2013 to September 18, 2010. Funds not obligated by that date will be
required to be returned to HUD.
B. The original focus for use of funds for the NSP was to provide down payment
assistance for purchase of foreclosed properties. Due to the accelerated timeframe,
Council amended the NSP program to allow for acquisition and rehabilitation of
foreclosed properties. This occurred on March 15, 2010 through Resolution 3220.
V. DISCUSSION
A. HUD and state auditors routinely request documentation that City Council has
granted authority for appropriate staff to sign project-level documents that
implement a Council-approved program. The NSP and the amendment described
above constitute the NSP and have been approved by Council. This Resolution
granting signature authority to the city manager implements the approved NSP
and provides the necessary accounting documentation.
B. It is estimated that two to four foreclosed properties will be acquired, then
rehabilitated and sold. Authorizing the city manager to execute project-related
documents will allow the City to implement the commitnnent of NSP funds in an
effective and timely manner.
4(e)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING SIGNATURE AUTHORITY FOR THE
NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM (NSP) PLAN ACTIVITIES
WHEREAS, the City has resolved in previous resolutions as follows;
Resolution 3148 - Approved the NSP Work Plan for stabilizing neighborhoods negatively
affected by foreclosures and abandoned properties; and
Resolution 3152 - Approved NSP Guidelines for carrying out down payment assistance
activities; and
Resolution 3220 - Amended the NSP Work Plan to reallocate fiends for acquisition and
rehabilitation activities; and
WHEREAS, the City has entered into a contract with Washington State Department of
Commerce for the administration and implementation of the Neighborhood Improvement
Program Plan with a deadline for obligating fiends totaling $426,343 by September 18, 2010; and
WHEREAS, participation in certain federal programs is beneficial to increase the supply
and quality of affordable housing, provide economic opportunities to housing stakeholders, and
stabilize neighborhoods; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
That the city manager is hereby authorized to execute all documents related to the
acquisition, rehabilitation and resale of real properties for the Council-approved Neighborhood
Stabilization Program in compliance with federal, state and local regulations.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2010.
CITY OF PASCO:
Matt Watkins
Mayor Pro-Tem
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark Leland 13. Kerr
CMC City Clerk City Attorney
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council April 20, 2010
TO: Gary Crutchfield, I lager Workshop Mtg.: 4/26/10
Rick White, ` \I Regular Mtg.: 5/3/10
Community & Economic Development Director
FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator
SUBJECT: Signature Authority for the Community Housing Improvement Program(CHIP)
I. REFERENCE(S):
A. Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
4/26: DISCUSSION
5/3: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution authorizing the city
manager to execute all documents related to the acquisition,
rehabilitation and resale of real properties for the Community
Housing Improvement Program.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Various amounts as approved by Council in any given program year.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. The CHIP is a community housing improvement program funded with federal
HOME Block Grant funds aimed at improving decent housing opportunities in
Pasco. City Council approves the annual expenditure of HOME funds.
B. Activities funded by the CHIP program include doN"i payment assistance for first
time homebuyers, rental rehabilitation loans for owner-occupied and rental
properties, and infill. The infill project involves acquisition of vacant property and
development of affordable housing units for low-moderate income families.
C. The City has used HOME funds to purchase property and construct three single-
family houses on South 5`t' Street north of Ainsworth Avenue. These three homes
are nearly ready to close for purchase.
D. Council has approved an infill project similar to 5th Street and Ainsworth Avenue
as a strategy for use of HOME fiends in 2010 (estimated use of $171,700 in
HOME funds).
V. DISCUSSION
A. HUD and state auditors routinely request documentation that City Council has
granted authority for appropriate staff to sign project-level documents that
implement a Council-approved program. The allocation of HOME Program funds
is approved by Council on an annual basis. This Resolution granting signature
authority to the city manager implements the approved annual HOME Program
and provides the necessary accounting documentation.
B. It is anticipated that vacant properties will be acquired, then developed and sold
during 2010 and future program years. Authorizing the city manager to execute
project-related documents will allow the City to effectively administer the HOME
program and the use of federal grant funds.
4(f)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION GRANTING SIGNATURE AUTHORITY FOR
COMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CHIP) ACTIVITIES
WHEREAS, the City has resolved in previous resolutions as follows:
Resolution 2908 - Approved CHIP regulations to increase affordable housing opportunities
utilizing federal funds; and
Resolution 2912 - Approved acquisition of two vacant lots for affordable housing opportunities
with HOME, funds; and
WHEREAS, the City has entered into a contract with Tri-Cities HOME Consortium that
is automatically renewed annually for receipt of HOME entitlement funds; and
WHEREAS, Staff prepares an annual Work Plan for the approval of Council, for use of
the annual HOME entitlement funds; and
WHEREAS, participation in certain federal programs is beneficial to increase the supply
and quality of affordable housing, provide economic opportunities to housing stakeholders, and
stabilize neighborhoods; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute all docuFnents related to the
acquisition, rehabilitation and sale of real properties for the Council-approved Community
Housing Improvement Program in compliance with federal, state and local regulations.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2010.
CITY OF PASCO:
Matt Watkins
Mayor Pro-Tern
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark Leland B. Kerr
CMC City Clerk City Attorney