HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010.03.01 Council Meeting Packet AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. March 1,2010
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance
3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be
no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Couneilmembers or the public,
the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately.
(a) Approval of Minutes:
1. Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated February 16, 2010.
(b) Bills and Communications: (A detailed listing of claims is available for review in the Finance
Manager's office.)
1. To approve General Claims in the amount of $1,535,285.22 ($118,922.67 in the form of
Wire Transfer Nos. 5413 and 5416; $13,113.65 in the form of Electronic Fund Transfer No.
0217; and$1,403,248.90 consisting of Claim Warrants numbered 175688 through .175897),
2. To approve Payroll Claims in the amount of 51,824,529.16, Voucher Nos. 40732 through
40802; and EFT Deposit Nos.30035732 through 30036272.
%(c) Final Plat (MF#FP 10-002) Casa Del Sol Division 2,Phase 1 (Fastrack,INC.):
I. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated February 24,2010.
2. Overview Map.
3. Vicinity Map.
4. Final Plat (Council packets only; copy available for public review in the Planning office, the
Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at http,//www.pasco-
wa,g()Y/wcbappJ ittcouncilre-ports).
To approve the Final Plat for Casa Del Sol Division 2,Phase 1.
*(d) Resolution No. 3216, a Resolution fixing the time and date for a public hearing to consider the
vacation of a portion of the east/west alley in Block 4, Steffm's Amended Addition,
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated February 24, 2010.
2. Vicinity Map_
3. Proposed Resolution,
4. Vacation Petition.
To approve Resolution No. 3216, setting 7.00 P.M., Monday, April 5, 2010, as the time and date
to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of the cast/west alley in Block Four
Steffm's Amended Addition,
(RQ MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
(a)
(b)
(c)
5. VISITORS-OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS:
(a)
(b)
(c)
6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
(h)
(c)
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO:
(None)
Regular Meeting 2 March 1,2010
8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(a) Ordinance No. , an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, Amending the Pasco
Municipal Code to Provide for Recreation Facilities and Program Fees, Amending Section
3.07.040 "Building Rental" and Section 3.07.120 `Recreation Programs"; Repealing Section
3.07.140 "Swimming Pools", Section 9.48.130 "Groups or Assemblies — Special Events",
Section 9.48.140 "Reservation — Application". Section 9.48.150 "Reservation Application —
Denial", and Section 9.48.160 "Parks and Recreation Facilities — Fees for Use"; and Repealing
Resolution No. 2272 "Rules,Regulations and Fees".
1. Agenda Report from Rick Terway, Administrative and Community Services Director dated
February 17, 2010.
2. Proposed Ordinance.
3. PMC 3.07.120 and .140 (2 pages).
4. PMC 9.48.130-160.
5. Shelter Fee Comparison.
6. Proposed Resolution Setting Facility Fees_
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No, to repeal varinus ordinances and
resolutions pertaining; to parks and rccreatio n Lees, policies and procedures aild, furthur. :ittthurize
publication by sump ary only.
Resolution No. , a Resolution establishing Recreation Facilities Rental Fees.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , setting recreational facilit
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
(None)
10. NEW BUSINESS:
*(a) Metro Drug Task Force Interlocal Agreement:
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated February 25, 2010.
2. Proposed Agreement (Council packets only; copy available for public review in the City
Manager's office, the Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at htto://pasco-
wa.trov/webap_,a/cityeotuicilreyorts).
MOTION: I move to approve the Metro Drug Task Force Interlocal Agreement to include West.
Richland, and further,authorize the Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement.
*(b) Award East Road 40 Sewer Extension,Project#09-1-03:
1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated February 24,2010.
2. Vicinity Map.
3. Bid Summary.
MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the East Road 40 Sewer Extension to Culbert
Construction, Inc. in the amount of$457,068.53, plus applicable sales tax, and further, authorize
the Mayor to sign the contract documents.
*(c) Amendment of Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan to include Heritage Industrial
Center Rail Spier and Resurface Arterial Streets:
1. Agenda Report from.Robert J. Alberts,Public Works Director dated February 25, 2010.
2. Project Maps.
MOTION: I move to approve the amendment to add Resurface Arterial Streets and Heritage
Industrial Center Rail Spur to the 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan(STIP).
Q *(d) Special Permit (MF# SP 09-012) Location and operation of a water park in a C-1 Zone
(Dynamic Waters,LLC)(9600 block of Sandifur Parkway):
I. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald,City Planner dated February 24, 2010.
2, Vicinity Map.
3. Proposed Resolution.
4. Report to Planning Commission.
5, Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 1/21/10 and 2/18110.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , approving the special permit for the
location and operation of a water park in a C-1 Zone as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
Q *(e) Special Permit (MF# SP 09-011) 10-Year Master Plan for the location of portable
classrooms on school sites throughout Pasco(Pasco School District):
I. Agenda Report from Shane O'Neill,Planner.l dated February 25, 2010.
2. Proposed Resolution.
3. Report to Planning Commission.
4. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 1/21/10 and 2/18/10.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. approving the special permit for the
Pasco School District Portable Classroom Master Plan as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
Regular Meeting 3 March 1,2010
11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
13. ADJOURNMENT.
(RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
Ml;# "Master File#...."
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
REMINDERS:
1. 1:30 p.m., Monday, March 1, KGH Battelle Room — Emergency Medical Services Meeting.
(COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN,Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.)
2. 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, March 3, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue—Franklin County Mosquito Control District
Meeting, (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN,Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.)
3. 5:30 p.m., Thursday, March 4, Parks & Rec. Classroom—Parks& Recreation Advisory Council Meeting.
(COUNCIL MEMBER REBECCA FRANCIK, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Atl,)
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 16, 2010
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor Pro-tem.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers present: Rebecca Francik, Michael Garrison, Torn Larsen, Matt Watkins
and A] Yenney. Excused: Robert Hoffmann, Joyce Olson.
Staff present: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager; Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney; Stan
Strebel, Deputy City Manager; Richard Terway, Administrative & Community Services
Director; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Bob Alberts,
Public Works Director; Denis Austin, Police Chief
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA:
(a) Approval of Minutes:
Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated February 1, 2010.
(b) Bills and Communications:
To approve General Claims in the amount of$2,769,597.09 ($84,717.88 in the form of
Wire Transfer Nos. 5404 and 5407; $10,000.00 in the form of Electronic Fund Transfer
No. 1012; and $2,674,879.21 consisting of Claim Warrants numbered 175478 through
175687).
To approve bad debt write-offs for utility billing, ambulance, cemetery, general accounts,
miscellaneous accounts, and Municipal Court (non-criminal, criminal, and parking)
accounts receivable in the total amount of$249,884,33 and, of that amount, authorize
$201,964.43 be turned over for collection.
(c) Purchase of Modular Building:
To authorize the City Manager to execute the sales agreement for the purchase of the
former Metro Modular Building and, further,to authorize payment from the general fund
with the cost to be included in the year-end supplemental budget.
(d) State Grant for Road 40 East Sewer Project:
To accept the grant offered by Washington State Public Works Board in the amount of
$550,000 for the Road 40 East Sewer Project and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the
contract,
MOTION: Mr. Garrison moved to approve the Consent Agenda as read. Ms. Francik
seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
Mayor Pro-tern Watkins reported on the Benton-Franklin Transit Board meeting.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Resolution No. 3215, a Resolution approving the Rental Rehabilitation Program
Guidelines.
MOTION: Mr. Garrison moved to approve Resolution No. 3215, approving the Rental
Rehabilitation Program Guidelines, Ms. Francik seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
I 3(a).1
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL FEBRUARY 16, 2010
NEW BUSINESS:
Extension of Library Services Agreement:
MOTION: Mr. Gam'son moved to approve the six-month contract extension with Mid-
Columbia Library District and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement.
Ms. Francik seconded. Motion carried unanimously,
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
Mayor Pro-tem Watkins noted the 2008 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was
included in Council's packet.
Mr. Yenney requested Council members serving on committees share information with
the rest of Council before sharing it with the media, referring to the recent Tri-City Herald
article regarding the dispatch center.
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
Council adjourned to Executive Session at 7,11 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes to
consider Collective Bargaining Strategy & Proposals with the City Manager,
Mayor Pro-tern Watkins called the meeting back to order at 7;31 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:31 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Joyce Olson, Mayor Debra L. Clark, City Clerk
PASSED and APPROVED this 1St day of March, 2010.
2
CITY OF PASCO
Council Meeting of:
March 1,2010
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We,the undersigned, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the
services rendered or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is a just, due and unpaid
obligation g nst t y an at we are authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim.2e- 4�_
GaryCr tchfleid, Manager Ri k Terway
Director Administrative&Comulty Services
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington,
do hereby certify that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received;that Wire Transfer
No's 5413 and 5416 in the amount of$118,922.67, have been authorized; that Electronic Fund Transfer No. 0217
in the amount of$13,113.65, has been authorized;that Check No's 175688 through 175897 are approved for
payment in the amount of S 1,403,248.90,for a combined total of$1,535,285.22 on this 3rd day of March,2010.
Councilmember Councilmember
SUMMARY OF CLAIMSIWIRE TRANSFERS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND:
Legislative 1,478.53
Judicial 7,558.14
Executive 2,897.61
Police 418,269.12
Fire 15,254.02
Administration&Community Services 64,170.80
Community Development 8,470.22
Engineering 3,43714
Non-Departmental 104,598.01
Library 96,866.05
TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 722,999.64
STREET 65,721.54
C. D. BLOCK GRANT 4,442.65
KING COMMUNITY CENTER 3,207.01
AMBULANCE SERVICE 7,472.14
CEMETERY 8,633.26
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 2,854.01
SENIOR CENTER 2,680.45
MULTI MODAL FACILITY 1,301.96
RIVERSHORE TRAIL_& MARINA MAIN 163.82
LITTER CONTROL 0.00
REVOLVING ABATEMENT 1,003.37
PARKS FUND 7,344.34
TRAC DEVEL & OPERATING 17,206.00
STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER 8,856.20
SPECIAL ASSESSMNT LODGING 11,583.49
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 0.00
WATER/SEWER 185,793.15
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING 41,696.77
EQUIPMENT RENTAL- REPLACEMENT 0.00
MEDICAUDENTAL INSURANCE 148,785.80
CENTRAL-STORES 1,813.99
PUBLIC FACILITIES DIST 26,311.32
PAYROLL CLEARING 36,377.68
LID CONSTRUCTION 180,334.02
TRi CITY ANIMAL CONTROL 48,702.61
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: 1,535,285.22
3(b).1
CITY OF PASCO
Council Meeting of:
Payroll Approval March 1, 2010
The City Council
City of Pasco
Franklin County, Washington
The following is a summary of payroll claims against the City of Pasco for the month of
February 2010 hick are resentea herewith for your review and approval.
C 6
Gar D. Cru ity Manager Rick Terway,Administrative & C nity Services Director
We, the undersigned City Council members of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County,
Washington, do hereby certify that the services represented by the below expenditures have been receives
and that payroll voucher No's. 40732 through 40802 and EFT deposit No's. 30035732 through 30036272
and City contributions in the aggregate amount of$1,824,529.16 are approved for payment on this
1st day of March 2010,
Councilmember Councilmember
SUMMARY OF PAYROLL BY FUND
GENERAL FUND:
Legislative $ 7,176.19
Judicial 70,321.93
Executive 61,233.31
Police 540,568.59
Fire 274,345.07
Administrative &Community Services 216,820.59
Community Development 81,181.28
Engineering 78,394.51
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,330,041.47
CITY STREET 29,387.10
BLOCK GRANT 5,910.31
MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER 5,396.98
AMBULANCE SERVICE FUND 113,603.25
CEMETERY 7,834.19
ATHLETIC FUND 2,944.38
SENIOR CENTER 12,726.40
STADIUM OPERATIONS 0.00
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY 0100
BOAT BASIN 265.31
REVOLVING ABATEMENT FUND 0.00
TASK FORCE 0.00
WATERISEWER 291,050.57
EQUIPMENT RENTAL- OPERATING 25,369,20
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 1,824,529.16
Payroll Summary
Net Payroll 875,646.02
Employee Deductions 534,935.58
Gross Payroll 1,410,581.60
City of Pasco Contributions 413,947,56
Total Payroll $ 1,824,529.16
3(b).2
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council February 24, 20I0
TO: Gary Crutchfie anager Regular Mtg.; 3/1/10
Rick White,
Community & Economic Development Director
FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT (MF# FP 10-002) Casa Del Sol Division 2, Phase 1 (Fastrack,
INC.
1. REFERENCE(S):
1. Overview Map
2. Vicinity map
3. Final Plat (Cotuicil packets only; copy available for public review in the Planning
office, the Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at http-://www.pasco-
w,.i.aov/webWp/cityCOLincilrepot-ts).
11. ACT10N REQUESTED OF COUNC L I STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
3/1: MOTION: I move to approve the Final Plat for Casa Del Sol Division 2,
Phase 1.
111. FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. The City Council previously approved a preliminary plat for the Casa Del Sol
Division 2 subdivision. The developer is now seeking final plat approval.
B. The Casa Del Sol Division 2 is a single-family residential development located
south of Sandifur Parkway and east of Road 52.
V. DISCUSSION:
A. Prior to the approval of a final plat, the developer is to either install all.
infrastructure or post a bond or other instrument that secures the financing for the
infrastructure improvements. In this case, the developer has completed most of the
improvements and has provided the City with a bond in the amount $5,000 to cover
the costs of outstanding improvements.
B. The final plat shows and contains information on primary control points, tract
boundaries, dimensions, bearings, lot numbers and other necessary engineering
data. in addition, the plat contains the required descriptions, dedication and
acknowledgment, and approval sections.
3(c)
Item: Final Plat Casa 1 Sol P3
Overview
Applicant: /
Map
File FP 10-002
4&1
Wit
s
� fi mu
mw « w lien xL . [ ,. a• — T 'i
air
it
- _, —�i �■ ■i•or ,{� wrSa�ilil��'� q��i0�ailalii4i./"d fi a6 �
,;, •!!■iitivM �elNSi�ika�[. r/lYIRA��"s � � ,,+e si ■. I tip.
til�siiti �R�iiirii3i/ i�sr�ia/ta::csi �• � .+a �3T aei � ■ >,,:+:a�<�.�►��' �
l�ileMrtai. ■yifls/�■fit +ern.. . !- �•.�, {1�_
'�» 1��Ri�� iRf�r;�r s� � ,.� w•'''. ;} `� �� �i -atm �� ������� � �... ,,,_� .�, � � c, rt V
���t�!!x�'�i�'•rt M�� �s e� iv ,•,� ors ,s too��M�w .•[1� . s :�r fly . " d� /1
--i�ii�?iiiEis `� tee: �:. s-. ;ra aim •s! � _ '�. �i�i4i/I��� +
�4 ':� ,t1 ;w •a►'y ym �s �iI a/ � R ..� o�,w■!■��i� I��■■��■�iiy w
'°�a1FE71il= iJ!L�iR►'"�.. � ar:ur�n;. a aye :a.a :,r �s .:. �, t - i!/I�a�i.+�i _. .•a� �II�A�-t•' 1
r: ■!7 iirsrx�i[� anois "s isi�r ti ra a[s ss 't�mi ms {r/. .• �y Nialso !� ■t>ES iwi d�11 i.�ilai+fQlllr► p
¢r�li�AEiIG �f4i�ii:` rie ilG irii� +i�iriy%f+ yw "UI r+ �i�w�[ • c/�i' + i��d������a, ':1 ���F �I�1 ':i✓ astir'• c' 12Z;2,i2�
ppitow d[r iafiirs u K ,tlY■d:� �i. 3 f I .dm
nilm r
r r� i1w�if[7ri'LYw+iwfi�fiR '�Z ; �� ovi �;/ � �Ly
:►�iFsii• ,ss � 'i • � Hwy■ si'a?,usS�� ' <�. -�rdr ,�
:ri• �.� a = girl ,{!'. y, ►�. � • ot:_ �� �.•� �+s is 'i•
if,f.Ii": e�r .m y t xs �..• a d�C`� �L. �[V Y.+Rr'6�3*a/ Li 'd' � .Cy'Gt
� � ��iR3�M[�■i!i'�ir.�f , :,.s.3 'w tii .�ti a✓�i ���.� .�
yr �!✓ `•e a �s + , q:� ♦ '� i.� iie3a�Yii•iri i+�. 0 l�ir.,rtif :+�d J
r a.ac9ti �>rt ei4 �• ��'e s:�li•ii:t.,: ►r n� �`� ` j • ' Jl�sia �i'r' `�
' � r ar�i�rrr�s-.�� Frr�u,.yx :iisiew: gar ; �� - ,� .g �•.. ,.�r � °� • •^� ,_� .
'.[ �'�i y :r+atRie�Y�,[i3ti vs4+r:y � '!. +� A 'y aS •i B �.Y '� � � •r
o � _ � _ .. . ,w �r�'. �, �+�.r� ut • ua ml:ctl.i ,� '�'�•�I�l�il��!fAsi'Otii.�ear�Ad.�a�Nr'. '_ '.'�c!.;, ;�:e°ip:<rai tc
o• 1S�' � � +sarlt � yc s Yir s�K+^��
e D I'ssw::ns+k' wt��!izi�n •r •.`yr� i�iL 1.Q ti%+ !' lath;
■ + � 01 �l;0411r�� �� JL - w+ahwtiA ♦' 4p!d r'Q61 99O+; WR+e'�ci1
��ri �r a! tja,r'i.�Ifi�_ .J, .� -_ '�• .• ;f lrii � �z cf rl" .&, J
• � 1�.���� i�r.�a'i�. ;.� •`'it��!►�`4•�.� �� Izi;�■ :d � �iarfl�
��' � �'!! s+�0'L d ✓ It � '� .. Jti�i .�.+la1s - i. .� •a r rs_ r1
Vicinity Item: Final Plat - Casa del Sol Div 2 P3
Applicant: /
Map
File FP 10-00
imp
\ S � Nil
gill
ON WN,
dim now
44 6.- ir
ONE _
all
20
t'VF
r� 1.
i `f J,ff,
.r 777 '•�1� � � .t t Ir.
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council February 24, 2010
TO: Gary Crutchtiel i anager Regular Mtg.: 311110
Rick White, f\JL
Community & onomic Development Director
FROM: David 1. McDonald, City Planner
SUBJECT: ALLEY VACATION (Mli# VAC '10-001) A portion of the east/west alley it
Block 4 Steffin's Amended Addition (Miguel Serrano)
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Vicinity Map
2. Proposed Resolution
3. Vacation Petition
I1. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
311: MT OTION: I move to approve Resolution No , setting 7:00
P.M., Monday, April 5, 2010, as the time and date to
conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of
the east/west alley in Block Four Steffin's Amended
Addition.
111. FISCAL. IMPACT:
NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. Miguel Serrano, the owner of Lots 12 and 13 of Block 4, Steffin's
Amended Addition has submitted a petition to vacate the alley between his
two lots. The alley has never been developed.
B. The petition requires the City Council to fix a public hearing to consider
the vacation request. The earliest regular City Council meeting available
for a public hearing, which provides the statutory 20-day hearing notice, is
April 5, 20'10.
3(d)
Item- Alley Vacation
vicinity Map
Applicant: Miguel Serrano N
File #: VAC 10-001
. }
,�. ST
Q I.� LW . r�
W ...�
r 1r �: r r
J
Area to bek . `
Vacated
p x�
RESOLUTION NO. (
A RESOLUTION FIXING THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO
CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE EAST/WEST ALLEY IN
BLOCK 4, STEFFIN'S AMENDED ADDITION
WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the
general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate rights-of-way; and
MY REAS, R.G.W. 35.79 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by
Resolution,
TOW, THEREFORE,
BF, IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
That a public hearing to consider vacating the east/west alley adjacent to Lots 12 and 13
in Block 4, Steffin's, will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council
Chambers at, 525 North 3r6 Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on April 5,
2010. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco gave notice of said public hearing as required by
law.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1St day of March, 2010.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark, CMC Leland B. Kerr
City Clerk City Attorney
Item : Alley Vacation �
Vicinity Applicant: Miguel Serrano
Map File #: VAC 10-001
"A" ST
—
w IQ
J Q � I to be
Vacated
LU
.. B.. ST
r �
FEE $200
CITY OF PASCO
STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION
MASTER FILE # 1 ' - ( DATE SUBMITTED: e2;
I, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting
property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the
following described street/alley rights-of-way:
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNED (Legal Description)
Print Name: !£ z)
Sign Name: 14 z1GL'�C �{
Address: � 11.1ti
1
Phone # ! 3-5&6' Date
Print Name:
Sign Nam • Y 1
Date
Print Name:
Sign Name:
Date
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council February 17, 2010
TO: Gary Crutchf 6Manager
FROM: Rick Ter-way, irector A is ative and
Community Services Workshop Mig.: 2122/10
Regular Mtg.: 311110
SUBJECT: Park and Recreation Fees
I. REFERENCE(S):
I, Proposed Ordinance
2. PMC 3,07.120 and .140(2 pages)
3. PMC 4.48.130-160
4. Shelter fee comparison
5. Proposed Resolution setting facility fees
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
2/22: Discussion
3101: Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance No, to repeal
various ordinances and resolutions pertaining to park and recreation fees,
policies and procedures and, further, authorize publication by summary
only.
Motion: I move to adopt Resolution No. setting
recreational facility fees.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Modest increase in facility rental income,
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Staff is recommending that the council set fees when needed by resolution and repeal the
various ordinances pertaining to facility fees, policies and procedures. In that same manner
all references to fees and policies will be contained in the new resolution.
B) At the February 2010 meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Board there was
discussion on fees for use of city facilities and prograins. The Board has recommended that a
fee structure be established and implemented using a resident/nonresident distinction, and
based on the following criteria: 1) Maintenance and operational cost, 2) current market
trends and 3)comparable jurisdictions.
C) Historically fees have not been charged for reserving shelters. Most cities charge fees for
shelter reservation,thus eliminating the"first come, first serve" problem.
D) The Recreation Services Division has always established program fees and for practical
considerations, should continue to do so; however they will be closely monitored to ensure
program fees are based on actual costs, market trends and comparable fees in local
jurisdictions.
E) Charges for facilities in the past were based on whether the user was profit or non-profit.
This is outdated as laws pertaining to non-profit have changed and it is very cumbersome and
costly to obtain that status. The recommended method is to use resident and non-resident
fees to differentiate between various groups of people. Staff will discount fees to residents as
their taxes help provide facilities (such as athletic fields, various building spaces, class rooms
and gymnasiums) and recreation staff; non-residents will typically be charge about 50%
more..
F) When setting athletic field fees, we must took at what the other cities and governmental units
are charging, and keep in mind the cost of operation.
G) In conclusion staff recommends repealing various ordinances and resolutions pertaining to
park and recreation fees, policies and procedures as a housekeeping measure and adopting a
new resolution that specifies the new facility rental fees.
8(a)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington,
Amending the Pasco Municipal Code to Provide for Recreation
Facilities and Program Fees, Amending Section 3.07.040
"Building Rental" and Section 3.07.120 "Recreation
Programs"; Repealing Section 3.07.140 "Swimming Pools",
Section 9.48.130 "Groups or Assemblies — Special Events",
Section 9.48.140 "Reservation -- Application", Section 9.48.150
"Reservation Application — Denial", and Section 9.48.160
"Parks and Recreation Facilities — Fees for Use"; and
Repealing Resolution No. 2272 "Rules,Regulations and Fees"
WHEREAS, fees for the City recreation facilities have historically been established by
Ordinance which lacks the flexibility necessary to modify fees necessitated by changing costs
and conditions. Such fees may be more economically and efficiently established by Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, clearer administrative authorization for the establishment for recreation
program fees and their criteria for determination is beneficial to both the citizens and the
administration of the City of Pasco; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City that recreation facilities fees and
program fees be consolidated for consistency and ease of access for the citizens of the City,
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 3.07.040 entitled "Building Rental" of the Pasco Municipal
Code, shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follow:
3.07.040 RECREATION FACILITY RENTAL. The City recreation facilities,
including pools, buildings, rooms, parks and shelters, available for rental to the public shall be
established by the Recreation Facilities Rental Fee Resolution adopted by the City Council and
as hereafter amended. (Ord. 3831, 2007; Ord. 3812, 2006; Ord, 3543, 2002.)
Section 2. That Section 3.07.120 entitled "Recreation Programs" of the Pasco
Municipal Code, shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
3.07.120 RECREATION PROGRAMS. 1indi1
listings The Cit y Managerer, ordesignee, is hereby authorized to set park and recreation program
fees and charges based upon:
A Theoperational costs and demands of each prograrn,
Ordinance - 1
B) The benefit to the community for such programs at less than actual costs.
C) The prograrn fees and charges for similar progrwiis charged by other nearby
jurisdictions.
D) Recreation market trends. (Ord. 3543, 2002.)
Section 3. That Section 307.140 entitled "Swimming Pools" of the Pasco Municipal
Code, shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety.
Section 4. That Section 9.48.130 entitled "Groups or Assemblies — Special Events"
of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety.
Section 5. That Section 9.48.140 entitled "Reservation — Application" of the Pasco
Municipal Code shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety.
Section 6. That Section 9,48,150 entitled "Reservation Application - Denial" of the
Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety.
Section 7. That Section 9.48.160 entitled "Parks and Recreation Facilities — Fee for
Use"of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety.
Section 8. That Resolution No, 2272 entitled "Rules, Regulations and Fees" shall be
and hereby is repealed in its entirety.
Section 9. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect on the 15a' day of March,
2010.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as
provided by law this day of 72010.
Joyce Olson,Mayor
A"1YEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debbie Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Ordinance - 2
aEF �L
6) Environmental Impact Statements Cost 23.10.040
(Ord. 3553, 2002; Ord. 3543, 2002)
3.07.110 POLICE
A) Concealed Weapon Permit: Fee/Charge Reference
1) Application $36.00 RCW 9.41.070
2) F.B.I. Fingerprints $24.00 RCW 9.41.070
3) Renewal Application $32.00 RCW 9.41.070
4) Late Renewal Application $42.00 RCW 9.41.070
5) Replacement Fee $10.00 RCW 9.41.070
B) Vehicle Impounds
1) Administrative Hearing $50.00 PMC 10.18.032
2) Appeai of Hearing Examiner Decision $43.00 PMC 10.18.045
(RCW 2.62.060)
(Ord. 3797, 2006; Ord. 3543, 2002).
3.07.120 RECREATION PROGRAMS:
Refer to program brochures for individual listings (Ord. 3543, 2002).
3.07.130 STREETS: Fee/Charge Reference
A) Paved Street Replacement (Deposit $100.00 13.36.010
for Patch)
1) Additional square yard fee $25.00 13.36.010
(Ord. 3543, 2002)
_--� 3.07.140 SWIMMING POOLS:
A) Rental: Fee/Charge Reference
Kurtzman/Richardson (2 hour) $100.00 Ord-3769
a) each additional hour $50.00 Ord-3769
b) extra guard/hour $15.00 Ord-3769
Memorial (2 hour) $235.00 Ord-3769
` a) each additional hour $100.00 Ord-3769
PMC Title 3 12/31/2009 27
b) extra guard/hour $15.00 Ord-3769
B) Admission fees— Daily/per session.
1) Kurtzman/Richardson:
a) Youth $ .50 Ord-3234
b) Adult $1.00 Ord-3234
2) Memorial:
a) Youth $1.00 Ord-3234
b) Adult $2.00 Ord-3234
C) Lessons: City Resident Non-City
Resident
Levels 1-6 $12.00 $18.00
Adults $16.00 $24.00
(Ord. 3769, 2006; Ord. 3543, 2002)
3.07.150 UTILITIES — BILLING:
Fee/Charge Reference
A) Account Set Up $25.00 13.16.090
1) Residential — advance minimum
deposit;
a) Inside City 1-4 Units (per unit) 2 mos./swr/wtr 13.16.035
b) Inside City 5 & over (per unit) 2 mos./swr/wtr 13.16.035
c) Outside City (subject to 90% 2 mos./swr/wtr 13.20.080
surcharge)
2) Commercial — advance minimum deposit:
a) Inside City 2 mos./swr/wtr 13.16.035
b) 3/4-8" Meter 2 rhos./swr/wtr 13.16.035
c) Outside City (subject to 90% 2 mos./swr/wtr 13.20.080
surcharge)
B) Recon./delinquent service before $50.00 13.16.090
4:30 p.m.
C) Recon/delinquent service after 4:30 $75.00 13.16.090
p.m.
PMC Title 3 12/31/2009 28
a- 3
9.48.100 FEEDING ANIMALS. It is unlawful in any manner to feed any fowl,
farm animals or wildlife, except at areas designated by the Director for such purposes.
Violation of any of the provisions of this section constitutes an infraction. (Ord. 3616
Sec. 1, 2003.)
9.48.120 COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY. It is unlawful to sell refreshments or
merchandise or service, or conduct commercial solicitations in any park, without the
permission of the Director, or without a concession contract with the City. Violation of
any of the provisions of this section constitutes an infraction. (Ord. 3616 Sec. 1, 2003.)
9.48.130 GROUPS OR ASSEMBLIES — SPECIAL EVENTS. City parks and
recreational facilities shall be available for any group or assembly on a first come, first
serve basis. However, the following activities require Special Event permits per Chapter
5.25 of this code: athletic, competitive or festival events; concerts, demonstrations
(more than 50 people), outdoor music festivals and parades. (Ord. 3616 Sec. 1, 2003.)
9.48.140 RESERVATION — APPLICATION. Reservations for most special events
may be made by obtaining a written permit through the office of the Director. A
reservation may be obtained by submitting a written application to the Director's office,
at least fourteen working days prior to the day of the intended use. The application
shall contain such information as the Director shall deem necessary to insure
compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. (Ord. 3616 Sec. 1, 2003.)
--4 9.48.150 RESERVATION APPLICATION - DENIAL. Applications will be denied,
approved or approved with conditions within 5 calendar days of the receipt of said
application. Denial of applications will be based on one or more of the following:
A) The space had already been applied to for reservation at the time of the
application submission, or;
13) The event or assembly for which the reservation was sought would,
because of its time, place or nature, obstruct or substantially interfere with the
enjoyment and use by the general public; or
C) The event or assembly for which a reservation was sought was in violation
of any applicable ordinance, law or regulation.
The Director shall have authority to approve a permit subject to the applicant
meeting reasonable conditions consistent with this chapter and all City ordinances and
policies as now existing or are hereafter amended. (Ord. 3616 Sec. 1, 2003.)
9.48.160 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES-FEE FOR USE. The Director is
authorized to charge fees for the use of City park and recreation facilities as are
established by City ordinances and policies as now exist or are hereafter amended.
(Ord. 3616 Sec. 1, 2003.)
PMC Title 9 8/4/2008 57
Proposed Fees Shelters
Chiawana 1/2 Day(R) 1/2 Day(NR) Full Day(R) Full Day(NR) Deposit
Shelter 1 50.00 60PO 90.00 108.00 100.00
Shelter 2 35.00 42.00 60.00 72.00 50-00
Shetter 3 35.00 42,00 60.00 72.00 50.00
Memorial 1/2 Day(R) 1/2 Day(NR) Full Day(R) Full Day(NR) Deposit
Pavilion 50.00 60.00 90.00 108.00 100 OD
Volunteer(NEW)
Pavilion 50.00 60.00 90.00 108.DO 100,00
Kurtzman
Pavilion 50.00 60.00 90.00 108.00 100.00
Kenrkewld 25.00 38,00 40,00 60.00:Small Shelters
50.00 75,00 $0.00 120.001 Large Shelters
58.00 88.00 116.00 176.0{ Ail Shelters
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING
RECREATION FACILITIES RENTAL FEES
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it in the best interest of the citizens of the
City of Pasco, that portion of its recreation facilities be available for rent by individuals, groups
and assemblies at equitable fees; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
Section 1. Rent of City Recreation Facilities. City parks and recreation facilities,
including pools, buildings, rooms, parks and shelters, shall be available for any group or
assembly on a first come, first serve basis
Section 2. Reservation �lieation. Reservations for recreation facilities rentals
and special events may be made by obtaining a written permit through the office of the Director
of Administrative and Community Services. A reservation of the facility may be obtained by
submitting a written application to the Director's office at least fourteen (14) working days prior
to the day of the intended use. The application shall contain such information as the Director
shall deem necessary to insure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
Section 3. Reservation AM.l tion - Denial. Applications will be denied, approved
or approved with conditions within five (5) calendar days of the receipt of said application.
Denial of applications will be based on one or more of the following;
A) The space has already been applied to for reservation at the time of the application
submission, or;
B) The event or assembly for which the reservation was sought would, because of its
time, place or nature, obstruct or substantially interfere with the enjoyment and use by the
general public; or
C) The event or assembly for which a reservation was sought was in violation of any
applicable ordinance, law or regulation.
The Director shall have the authority to approve a permit subject to the applicant meeting
reasonable conditions consistent with all City ordinances and policies as now existing or are
hereafter amended.
Section 4. Schedule of Facilities Rental Fees.
See Attached schedule
Section 5. Schedule of Pool Rental Fees. (Reserved)
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of March, 2010.
CITY OF PASCO:
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark Leland B. Kerr
City Clerk City Attorney
Parks and Recreation Fees Schedule
Location 1 1/2 day 1/2 day Full Fayl Full Day supervisor IDeposit
Proposed Shelter Fees Resident Non-Res Resident Non-Res
Volunteer- Pavilion 50.00 75.00 90.00 135.001 1 100,00
Memorial - Pavilion 50.00 75.00 90.00 135.001 1 100.00
Kurtzman - Pavilion 50.00 75.00 90.001 135.00 100.00
Chiawana #1 50.00 75.00 90.001 135,00 100.00
Chiawana#2 35.00 52.001 60.00 90.00 50.00
Chiawana#3 35.00 52.00 60,00 90.00 50.00
Hourly rate Hourly rate Isupervisor Deposit
Proposed Facility Fees I Resident Non-Res per/hour
City Hall Gym 1 15.00 22.00 12.00 100.00
MILK Center 15.00 22.00 12.00 100.00
City Hall Classroom 15.00 22.00 12.00 50.00
Alcohol Supervisor
(1st 4- Alcohol (1st per/100 Deposit
Min 4-hours Min 4-hours hours) 4-hours) per/hour Deposit w/alcohol
Current Senior Center Fees Resident Non-Res Resident Non-Res
SC Multipurpose Room (entire) 75.00 122.00 120.00 180.C)01 15.001 300.00 450.00
SC Multipurpose Room - north only 25.00 37.00 40.00 60.00 15,00 100.00 I50.00
SC Multipurpose Room -south only 25.00 37.00 40.001 60.00 15.00 100.00 150.00
SC Multipurpose Room - middle only 25.00 37.00 40.001 60.00 15.00 100.00 J 50.00
SC Education Room 25.00 37.00 NA NA 15.00 IC)0.001 NA
SC Craft Room 25.00 37.00 NA NA 15.00 100.00 NA
Computer Lab 25.00 37.00 NA NA 15.00 100.00 NA
Kitchen (per hour/supervisor req.) 75.00 112.001 NA NA 15,00 200.00 NA
Entire SC Fee (no pool or computer) 200.00 300.00 NAI NA 15,00 600.00 NA
Card Area 25.00 37.00 NA NA 15.00 100.00 NA
Hourly rate Hourly rate Hourly rate
Field Fees (rental only;not league) Field Prep Lights Supervisor
Field location Resident Non-Res
PSC #1 7.00 25.00 12.00 As required @ $15.00/hour
PSC#2 7.00 25.00 12.00
PSC #3 7.00 25.00 12.00
PSC #4 7.00 25.00 12.00
PSC#5 7.00 25.00 12.00
PSC#6 7.00 2S.001 12.00
Mound Rental (daily) 50.00
PSC Spray Park(rent for closed party) 50.00 75.00
Memorial Field#1 7.00 9.00 12.00
Memorial Field #2 7.00 9,00 NA
Highland Football #1 7.00 9.00 NA
Highland Football #2 7.00 9,00 NA
Highland Football #3 7.00 9.00 NA
36th Soccer #1 10.00 12.001 INA
36th Soccer 42 10.00 12,001 INA
36th Soccer#3 10.00 12.00 INA
36th Soccer#4 10.00 12.00 NA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council r February 25, 2010
FROM: Gary Crutchfiel Manager Regular Mtg.: 03/01/10
SUBJECT: Metro Drug T, sk force Interlocal Agreement
1. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Agreement (Council packets only; copy available for public review in
the City Manager's office, the Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at
httn:/!www.T)asco-wa.govlwebgo/citvcounQilrgpUrts).
H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
03/01: MOTION: I move to approve the Metro Drug Task Force Interlocal
Agreement to include West Richland, and further, authorize the
Mayor to sign the Interlocal Agreement.
111. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FAC'T'S BRIEF:
A) The cities of Kennewick, Richland and Pasco, along with Benton and Franklin
counties, have operated the Metro Drug Task Force through Interlocal Agreement
for more than 20 years. For many of those years the operations included West
Richland, but West Richland withdrew from the operation in 2004.
B) A new Interlocal Agreement was established amongst the three cities and two
counties in late 2009, renewing their commitment to continue operation of the
Metro Drug Task Force. The city of West Richland., in January of this year,
initiated their request to rejoin the Metro Drug Task Force.
V. DISCtiSSION:
A) The addition of West Richland to the Metro Drug Task Force will add one
additional task force detective (each participating jurisdiction is required to
provide at least one full-time police officer) and will help to assure activities that
may involve the West Richland community are included in the Metro Drug Task
Force efforts.
B) Staff recommends approval of the new Interlocal Agreement, as the only changes
simply reflect the addition of West Richland to the operation.
10(a)
AGENDA REPORT NO. 2
FOR: City Council February 24, 2010
TO: Gary Crutchfield, Cit ger
Robert Alberts,IA1- q Director
4
FROM: Michael McSh , _°ity Engineer Regular Mtg.: 03/O1/10
SUBJECT: Award East Road 40 Sewer Extension, Project 409-1-03
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Vicinity Map
2. Bid Summary
I1. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL I STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
03101: MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the East Road 40 Sewer
Extension to Culbert Construction, Inc. in the amount of
$457,068.53, plus applicable sales tax, and further, authorize
the Mayor to sign the contract documents.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Sewer Utility
Washington State Public Works Board Grant
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) On February 24, 2010, stair received eight (8) bids for the Fast Road 40 Sewer
Extension, Project 909-1-03. The low bid was received from Culbert
Construction, Inc. in the amount of $457,068.53, plus applicable sales tax. The
second lowest bid received was from Rotschy, Inc. in the amount of$459,292.50,
plus applicable sales tax. The Engineer's Estimate for the project is $794,245.00,
plus applicable sales tax,
B) On February 16, 2010, council accepted the grant offered by the Washington
State Public Works Board in the amount of$550,000.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) This project involves a 30" diameter bore under Highway 12 and the installation
of approximately 3,000 lfof21" diameter sewer.
Staff recommends award of the contract to Culbert Construction, Inc.
10(b)
City of Pasco
East Road 40 Sewer Extension
Project No. 09-1-03
February 17, 2010
BID SUMMARY
Total
1. Culbert Construction, Inc. $45708.53
2. Rotschy, Inc. $459,292.50
3. Selland Construction, Inc. $487,133.00
4. Premier Excavation $502,985.25
5. Mahaffey Enterprises, Inc. $5339540.00
6. Goodman & Mehlenbacher $563,828.25
7. Johansen Excavating $5935187.00
8. MRM Construction, Inc. $1005824,50
Engineer's Estimate $794.245.00
AGENDA REPORT NO. 05
FOR: City Council February 25, 2010
TO: Gary Crutchliel eanager
FROM: Robert J. 1 rts, Public Works Director Regular Mtg.: 03/01/10
SUBJECT: Amendment of Six-Year Transportation improvement Plan to include
Heritage Industrial Center Rail Spur and Resurface Arterial Streets
I. REFERENCES):
1. Project Maps
11I. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
03/01: MOTION: I move to approve the amendment to include Resurface Arterial
Streets and Heritage Industrial Center Rail Spur to the 2010 Six
Year Transportation improvement Plan (STIP).
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Each year, agencies prepare their Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan
which is adopted by the end of June yearly. Any changes to the STIP need to be
presented to City Council for approval.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The City of Pasco was requested to submit projects through the Benton Franklin
Council of Governments to be added to the original list of projects being
submitted for the 2010 Federal Economic Stimulus 2 Program. The City
submitted two projects to be considered; Resurface Arterial Streets and Heritage
Industrial Center Rail Spur.
B) Staff recommends that Resurface Arterial Streets and Heritage industrial Center
Rail Spur be added to the 2010 STIP, Resurface Arterial Streets will resurface
portions of Industrial Way, Hillsboro Street, Railroad Avenue, Road 68, Argent
Road and `A' Street, Funding will consist of $1.0 million dollars of federal
stimulus JOBS funds and $150,000 City Overlay funds. Heritage Industrial
Center Rail Spur will construct approximately 6000 feet of rail spur off the BNSF
main track, Funding Nvill consist of S1.0 million dollars of federal stimulus JOBS
funds.
10(c)
RESURFACE ARTERIAL STREETS
B
v AN GROlflt[al UNDdKY
E
G
N
By
wolamm RD
Fp
m
� / a
1�
sR,
l � \
HERITAGE RAILSPUR
�f 1 LL ORO ST
O
CITY LIMITS
1-1 2
AnIES •r
9�
5 �
N •EST - �.%
LEW
�El S
"n^S
UP S
PROJECT LOCATION
c04 l4
RIB 4
4
.J
VICINITY MAP
(NOT TO SCALE)
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council February 24, 2010
4omic TO: Crary Cr utchfield, nager Regular Mtg.: 3/1110
Rick White,Community & Ecevelopment Director
FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT' (MF# SP 09-012) Location and operation of a water park in a
C-1 Zone Dynamic Waters LLC 9600 block of Sandifur Parkway
L REFERENCES):
1. Vicinity Map
2. Proposed Resolution
3. Report to Planning Commission?
4. Planning Commission l41n:ites: Dated 1/21/10 and 2/18/10
II, ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
311: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , approving the
special permit for the location and operation of a water park in
a C-1 Zone.
Ill[. FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE
1V. IIISTORV AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On January 21, 2010, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to
determine whether or not to recommend a special permit be granted for the
location and operation of a water park in the 9600 block of Sandifur Parkway.
B. Following conduct of the public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that
with conditions, it would be appropriate to recommend approval of a special
permit for a water park in the 9600 block of Sandifur Parkway.
C. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached Resolution.
D. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been
received.
iota
Item: Special Permit - Water Park
V'C'n'ty 1 / licant: Dyna
Map
-le SP F1
09-012
179�,Ciii 410 11111A'
ow
_�. ,,� _�, ��+,rrt���n��,`i�:� � .;,al���ir�? e° ;, py` '' it C��"6�.�'- ' ��►"
=: _ _ *' `'��:tciY�il t�s��l�y��,����s�l:i�����¢!�:,► l.ixlllll�_
Vi.. +'t; f!' � '� 11tt` �� � ��•Sy'i(<]. f.,rM7;1(a..�:: /�' �� �i. ��tyr".s��y��y r
-1A31; la�
�� ` �• _ Y - '� ��t�:[lt�� a ��4C2f��:r�At�Y� �. i%ts`]ltl:p�l�l� _ � - � ����MI� '�R@�•�l�n' s �ii�
� ;�.,.�►<t9 f. ��lrca. � p� fit. _ �•.r�.�-. - �., ,.s>'��'....�rl
jill 40 a 12a s AX z,
- _ -
�}`�• '<y - 'F f °' �r �r ��W.`��l�a+t is�,f
•jM � _
�� •I y�l'..a.ae r L�r e� Y
Alp -4
1 A4404
.` '�'�l�l'� : -- °--..� _'_-.. , +��•+ �gdr:•' dal
dig
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A WATER PARK
WHEREAS, Dynamic Waters, LLC submitted an application for the location of a water
park in the 9600 block of Sandifur Parkway on Tax Parcels 115460056 and 115450045; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 21, 2010 to
review the proposed water park;and,
WHEREAS, following deliberations on February 18, 2010 the Planning Commission
recommended approval of a Special Pen-nit for the water park with certain conditions;
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to Dynanuc Waters, LLC for the location of a water
park in a C-1 (Retail Business) zone under Master File #f SP 09-012 with the following
conditions:
a) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
b) The water park shall be constructed in substantial conformance with the site plan
dated 2/5/2010;
c) The 30 fool utility easement along the southern boundary of the site must be hard
surfaced a minimum of 1.5 feet in width and remain accessible to City Public Works
crews at a1l times;
d) Building design and site landscaping must comply with the development
requirements of the [-182 Corridor Overlay District regulations;
e) A traffic study inust be submitted prior to the issuance of any building permits for the
water park, If applicable, street improvements may be required;
t) Sight screening walls along Sandifur Parkway must be articulated and constructed
with masonry block or stone;
g) All wall and fencing designs must be reviewed and approved by the Community and
Economic Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits;
h) That portion of the site not devoted to buildings, structures or impervious surfaces
must be maintained in a landscaped, orderly and neat manner as approved by the
Community 8c Economic Development Director;
i) All buildings, walls and structures, except signage, must be set back from the
Sandifur Parkway right-of-way at least 20 feet;
j) Night lighting including parking lot lighting must be shielded to prevent light
encroachment on adjoining properties;
k) The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit has not been obtained
by May 2012.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1st day of March, 2010
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark,City Clerk Leland B. Kerr,City Attorney
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP 09-012 APPLICANT: Dynamic Waters LLC.
HEARING DATE: 1/2 1/ 10 4504 W. Henry Street
ACTION DATE: 2/ 18/ 10 Pasco, WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Water/Amusement Park in a
C-1 Zone
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: Lots 8 & 9, Binding Site Plan 96-03
General Location: 9600 Block of Sandifur Parkway west of
Broadmoor Square Outlet Mall
Property, Size: Approximately 27 acres
2. ACCESS: The site has access from Sandifur Parkway and
Bedford Street.
3. UTILITIES: A major water line (16") is located in Sandifur
Parkway along the full distance of the property and a 12" sewer
line is located in an easement along the southern boundary of the
site. There is also an 18" sewer line running north and south
immediately east of the site.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject property is currently zoned
C-1 (Retail Business) and consists of two vacant parcels.
Surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
NORTH - C-1 -Offices and mini storage
SOUTH - Highway 1-182
EAST - C-1 - Broadmoor Outlet Mall
WEST - C-1 - Offices and a motel
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates
this area for commercial use.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been
issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) in accordance
with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA),
Chapter 43.21(c) RCW,
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to develop a recreational water park on 27
acres of land located between Sandifur Parkway and 1-182 directly west
of the Broadmoor Square mall. Water parks are not a listed permitted
use in any zoning district. The most analogous use in the zoning
regulations is miniature golf courses and similar recreational uses as
identified under the unclassified uses in Chapter 25.86 dealing with
special permits. After reviewing the proposal with the City Attorney it
was determined that a water park is a recreational use similar in nature
to a golf course or miniature golf course and would require review
through the special permit process.
The revised site plan requested by the Planning Commission shows the
27 acre proposed water park site to be developed in one single phase. In
addition to the need for a land use special permit the proposal also
needs special permit review because of the height of the main water
slide. The "Mach 7 Pipeline" slide could reach 60 feet in height.
Structure heights in the C-1 zoning district are limited to 35 feet unless
a greater height is approved by a special permit. The proponents'
application includes a request for an increase in height from 35 feet to
60 feet.
The general vicinity near the proposed water park site has been
developing with retail and office uses. There are 3 buildings (Roach Law
Offices, Kadlec Medical Clinic and the Sleep Inn) which are close to the
35 feet height limitation while the remainder of the buildings are only
one story in height. Given the nature of the general area, it would be
important to carefully consider the character of the existing development
and the potential for the proposed water park to create nuisance
conditions for the existing development and intended development.
The layout of the site and the placement of the slide structures on the
site will play an important role in addressing concerns about noise and
the compatibility of scale and bulk of the large slides in comparison with
surrounding and intended office buildings. By locating the larger slide
features toward the south end of the site the noise and structure scale
issues can be addressed. General noise and commotion created by
hundreds of water park users can be addressed by the installation of a
solid wall.
The Planning Commission needs to determine if the site location is
appropriate for the proposed use and what, if any, site development
features need to be incorporated into the plan to protect the intended
character of the general area. These additional development features
2
include: the need for sight and sound screening walls along property
lines; slide setbacks to ameliorate adverse appearance issues of having
non-traditional structures (water slides) close to -property lines which
may overpower the architectural qualities of adjoining buildings; the
need for fencing or walls along the freeway; exterior and interior
landscaping to support the intended 1-182 standards; the need for
creating a streetscape appearance along Sandifur Parkway compatible
with the existing development; the parking lot design that incorporates
appropriate landscaping to improve the appearance of a large area
covered with asphalt; and the need for a parking lot circulation system
that allows quick, safe and convenient ingress and egress from Sandifur
Parkway,
A water park is not a specifically listed use under the (PMC 25.78. 170)
parking regulations within the zoning code, The most analogous use
listed is a swimming pool, The wave pool is the closest feature in the
proposed park to a swimming pool. The wave pool would require 125
parking spaces. Based on the swimming pool criteria the slides would
require 265 additional parking spaces. The main parking lot in the
proposed site plan contains 582 parking spaces and an additional 76
spaces are provided in a separate lot for employees. The parking lot
contains 186 spaces over and above what would be required for the
water features. The family fun center and go-cart track also need
parking. The additional 186 spaces could accommodate a half acre fun
center building and go-cart track. At 3 persons per vehicle the parking
lot would accommodate 1,746 people. The hotel site also contains
parking.
Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
Manual 7th Addition, an amusement park with 27 acres could generate
about 2,000 vehicle trips on a weekday and 4,800 vehicle trips on a
Saturday. By comparison, the ITE manual estimates that a store the
size of the Road 68 Wal-Mart can generate about 20,000 vehicle trips on
a week day and 24,000 on a Saturday. The Wal-Mart site and
businesses fronting Road 68 in front of Wal-Mart collectively contain
about 25 acres with 1,160 parking spaces, Any of the retail business
located on Road 68 would be permitted on the site in question. If the
site was developed with general office uses the site would generate about
1,700 vehicle trips per weekday based on the ITE Manual. If the site
was developed with just medical and dental buildings, the ITE Manual
indicates the average daily weekday vehicle trips to be about 5,600. The
ITE estimates for amusement parks were based on only two studies. A
traffic study should be required prior to the issuance of any building
permits to determine the extent of traffic impacts on Sandifur Parkway.
It is difficult to determine if any modifications will be needed, such as
deceleration lanes, without a traffic study. Traffic studies were required
3
as a part of the Wal-Mart and the Lowe's building permit submittals.
The proposed parking lot for the water park is only about 100 spaces
less than the size of the Lowe's parking lot on Road 68.
The purpose for the special permit process is to allow for extraordinary
review of development proposals listed as unclassified uses or
conditional uses. The review process is used to determine if a given site
would be an appropriate location for an unclassified use and what
conditions may be necessary to address the review criteria found in PMC
25.86.060. Review of the six items under PMC 25.86.060 should be
undertaken in light of the issues discussed above.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are
initial findings drawn from the background and analysis sections of the
staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to
this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted
during the open record hearing.
1. The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary.
2. The site contains approximately 27.7 acres.
3. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for future Commercial
development.
4. The site is zoned C-1 (Retail Business).
5. The site is vacant.
6. Surrounding properties are zoned C-1.
7. A 12" sanitary sewer line extends across the southerly 30 feet of
the proposed site. An 18" sewer line extends north and south
immediately east of the site.
8. Permitted uses within the C-1 district include professional and
medical offices, retail stores, banks motels, restaurants, auto
repair facilities, auto detail shops, and membership clubs.
9. Permitted conditional uses within the C-1 district include
automotive sales rentals, mini-storage, parking lots and wineries.
10. The site is adjacent to Highway I-182.
11. Surrounding properties have developed with permitted retail and
office uses.
12. The site is located in the I-182 Corridor Overlay District.
4
13. The I-182 Corridor Overlay District includes enhanced
development standards.
14. The site has access from both Sandifur Parkway and Bedford
Street.
15. The applicant is proposing to develop a water/amusement park.
16. The proposed water/amusement park will include various water
slides, a wave pool, go-kart track, a gift shop/concession stand,
locker rooms, a picnic area with gazebo, and a family fun center.
17. Water parks and amusement parks are not a listed permitted use
in the C-1 District.
18_ Water parks and amusement parks are considered unclassified
uses that require review through the special permit process before
locating in a C-1 District.
19. The tallest slide in the proposed park could be up to 60 feet high.
20. PMC 26.42.050 permits a maximum building height of 35 feet in a
C-1 District.
21. PMC 26.42.050 permits structure heights in excess of 35 feet by
special permit in C-1 Districts.
22. The tallest office building near the proposed water park site is
between 30 and 35 feet.
23. The proposed site is located about 800 feet from the Road 100/I-
182 Interchange.
24. The proposed water/amusement park contains a 556 space
parking lot.
25. Based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual 7th Addition a 27 acre
amusement park could generate about 2,000 vehicle trips on a
weekday and 4,800 vehicle trips on a Saturday. (These traffic
numbers are based on only two studies)
26. If the site was developed with 156,000 (3.5 acres) square feet of
medical/dental office the ITE Manual estimates the site would
generate 5,600 vehicle trips per weekday.
CONCLUSIONS
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its
conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The
criteria are as follows:
5
Y) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the _goals, policies,
objectives, and text of the Comprehensive ManP
The Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed site for commercial
development. The Plan encourages attracting new employers to the area
who promote tourism and recreational opportunities. The water park
would serve as a regional recreational attraction in southeast
Washington. Policy Goal LU-4-A encourages locating commercial
facilities at major street intersections. The proposed site for the water
park is located within 800 feet of the I-182 / Road 100 Interchange.
2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
The site is located on a major arterial street and is served by all utilities.
Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual, permitted retail uses and medical
offices could generate more weekday traffic on Sandifur Parkway than
the proposed water park. The nearby water and sewer lines have been
sized and constructed to accommodate full commercial build-out on the
proposed site. In reviewing the proposal with the City Engineering
Division there was no concern about adverse impacts to the water and
sewer systems.
3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to
be in harmony with the existing or intended character of the
general vicinityP
The uses contained in PMC 25.42, the C-1 Retail Business District,
identify the intended character for the site and general vicinity. These
uses include automotive detail shops, banks, motels, professional and
medical offices, retail stores, restaurants, auto repair facilities, and
membership clubs. Much of the activities associated with these uses are
conducted indoors, Buildings within the C-1 district are generally
limited to 35 feet in height.
The proposed water park will contain a number of structures not
typically found in C-1 districts such as tall lattice type towers needed to
support multi-colored fiberglass water slides. The tallest tower and slide
reaches 60 feet in height. As requested by the Planning Commission the
applicant revised the site plan to maintain a traditional commercial
presence along Sandifur Parkway. The 60 foot water slide is located
along the southern edge of the site. The motel/hotel area has been
modified with one main hotel building facing Sandifur Parkway and a
landscaped parking lot similar to nearby parking lots. The revised hotel
layout screens the water park from the west supporting the desire to
maintain the traditional commercial appearance of the area. The revised
features include additional building elevations, landscaped setbacks and
6
parking along Sandifur Parkway. The parking lot has been relocated to
the southeast corner of the site.
The revised site plan incorporates the design features and items the
Planning Commission discussed in the public hearing.
4) WiII the location and height of proposed structures and the site
design discourage the development of permitted uses on properly
in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof?
As requested by the Planning Commission the revised site plan
incorporates design features that locate the tallest structure along the
freeway and mostly landscaping, parking lots, and buildings along
Sandifur Parkway and Bedford Street. These features are designed to
encourage the development of traditional office and commercial uses on
adjoining properties.
s) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more
objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes,
vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the
operation of any permitted uses within the district?
Per the ITE Trip Generation Manual the proposal will not generate any
more traffic than if the site was fully developed with intended retail and
office uses. The redesigned site plan addresses the concerns expressed
during the public hearing dealing with noise and the operational aspects
of the proposed water park.
5) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if
located and developed where proposed, or in any way will
become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district?
The water park has been designed to address possible nuisance
conditions by incorporating walls, landscaping and other features into
the plan. General support of the proposal as voiced at the public
hearing indicates the proposed water park is not viewed a nuisance
generator.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION: 1 move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings
of Fact and conclusions as contained in the February 18, 2010
staff report.
7
MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the
Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special
permit to Dynamic Waters, LLC for the location and operation of a
water park in the 9600 block of Sandifur Parkway with conditions
as contained in the February 18, 2010 staff report:
APPROVAL CONDITIONS
1 The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
2. The water park shall be constructed in substantial conformance
with the site plan dated 2/5/2010;
3. The 30 foot utility easement along the southern boundary of the
site must be hard surfaced a minimum of 15 feet width and
remain accessible to City Public Works crews at all times;
4. Building design and site landscaping must comply with the
development requirements of the I-182 Corridor Overlay District
regulations;
5. A traffic study must be submitted prior to the issuance of any
building permits for the water park. If applicable, street
improvements may be required;
6. Sight screening walls along Sandifur Parkway must be articulated
and constructed with masonry block or stone;
7. All wall and fencing designs must be reviewed and approved by
the Community and Economic Development Director prior to the
issuance of building permits;
8. That portion of the site not devoted to buildings, structures or
impervious surfaces must be maintained in a landscaped, orderly
and neat manner as approved by the Community & Economic
Development Director;
9. All buildings, walls and structures, except signage, must be
setback from the Sandifur Parkway right-of-way at least 20 feet;
10. Night lighting including parking lot lighting must be shielded to
prevent light encroachment on adjoining properties;
11. The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit has
not been obtained by May 2012.
8
Item:Vicinity
Speclal
l
Applicant:
Map 7.
File #-, SP 09-012
_ r Ii� R dal _ r-- =r •i 2�Sn:a.; J� �i-� `�r•I�! rig, u�atsa.tl' 1FaLi
\ �' ,� , �. :i :�€ut;i : 3tbe1�33 •r si�a?r !M11� � '" „r�,i �� ���
lulu � ? !l II�#,I ia -
j,y t 4+ I: A �Fw
v-�i�C�il�J1! _.y a/tl:�Illif ��� .` Mw l���i�.�:�.T
I i?t� rzM� .. :.:t ��/loll 16� r<�a 3 � l_,Uu,
♦ •—,a .� .:•I�:►4�3t ' ��°•. if E Y: Vi � �i`�i41i•'Y ��� � J •• fe rr,�
l.ii[:ItE.s?t.rJt' '7.:��illill�7tillwtti'� {Jltrttlll l�� �t3dl+bt�S#���oa.l_3a�
Ali-. r
�! j
>P t
boo
owl
lot 414
- ~ ` � �_ � yy� ����`. _ am`• YI°d�";
•
$/ "�'+- slr• 'CIS*
?ail�9► 1� 4s#�i�
414 lode A
f•.r, r - •.�• ale. �y_+�IQroy,.�
ids=pia
��g_•.4ic �•m�
It 4
Land Item: Special Permit - Water Park
Use Applicant: , ', "
Map File #: SP 09-012
■■■n■■■■■■,� ��r� .��� u111i1iioi11■
It
1111:.:::� �/►�
���u�mmnn►I///��\\��irm�����uw� ���a�i mmrn�����11 ��■����i►�/����i■
■ lIIIIIIIIII��� ���II i 11i � ■ ■ 11/11111111111■
IIIIIIII1111C .II • • • 1111 C •. '''� 1`'�'''''
■�r�umurumnill\\`///dim N�� ■
.R ■ � i ■��11�1�■■■■iii'.
-' '`' '1■■11111■■_111■■
■ ■1111.111111111
SON
t ■ 1.111111111x111/
• � y ti-il 1♦
■ 1liiii� 11111=�
■ /ii1�Il�. 1�ii�'■
Item: Special Permit - Water Park
Zoning Appl. / Dynamic Waters Q
■■■n ��■�� ! ■■■■�� ■111 � ■�������������■ ;
"I F-1 1//�'��\���umi�e,�mu■ �iGwwnuinn 41 sI�t��1 ■ � ■����►�I��■��■
— (IIIIIIIIIIIC ,•II • — 'lllllllliil�Ill _ f ■■�.�..�����.�■
■ 11111111111 �� X11 � 1111111111 11 O ■ " : ,-
■�m�uiuuium�►1�\�////viii :vmun�i����� ���■ ■■■�
• _w =` ■���■ ■■ill■■
■ 1111111111111■�
-�'��~ •4 ■ 1111*i�ii111■■
' �� ■ 1■111111111111�
�' a� ■� „1■ t1■11■1111a�11■
SON
■
■1111 .
111�I�C ■FI111 /
11 y'
8ft(A
Vftmt P�tP
4 A-W
111.4a
mm
BAHAMA BAY
WATERPARK COMPLEX
Pasco,Wasbftgftn
ftaro:I IIIII so
0 w 1w sw wr dw AM
215110 Site Plan
1 �
�NrR�vc� ���V�trra�
Lj
ff$CHtT�CTS R�1rDF'kl<l7CT
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
1/21/ 10
A. SPECIAL PERMIT Location and overation of a large scale (26
acres) water Park (I]ynamic Waters, LLCI (9600
block of Sandifur Pkwy west of Sroadmoor
Square) (MF# SP 09-012}
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff.
Staff stated notice was published in the Tri-City Herald and mailed to surrounding
property owners. Staff reviewed the 27 acre site on Sandifur Parkway including
the zoning and surrounding uses. It was explained that water parks/amusement
parks are most analogous to the unclassified recreational uses requiring special
permits. The proposed site plan was reviewed along with a discussion on traffic.
The ITE Manual indicated the project could generate up to 2,000 daily vehicle trips
during the week and up to 4,800 daily vehicle trips on weekends. These counts
were compared to permitted uses such as a Wal-Mart store that can, according to
the ITE Manual, generate 20,000 daily vehicles trips during the week and 24,000
on a Saturday. If the site was to develop with general offices consisting of 3 acres
of floor space about 1,700 vehicle trips would occur. If the same space was
developed for medical/dental offices, the site would generate about 5,600 vehicle
trips per day.
Staff further explained the site was in an area being developed with office and
retail uses consisting of one and two-story buildings. Staff was concerned about
the scale of the proposed water slides in relationship to surrounding traditional
buildings. Preservation of the streetscape was another concern. Staff then listed
the following items that would need to be addressed:
• sight and sound screening walls around the property;
• noise generated from the use of the slides;
• the height and scale of the largest slide;
• the location of the largest slide;
• exterior landscaping to support the intended I-182 standards;
• building designs to compliment the neighborhood;
• the need to maintain a visual presence along Sandifur Parkway with the
established pattern of the neighborhood;
• the need to redesign the parking lot entrance;
• the need to address access issues to the sewer- line located south of the
property;
• a traffic study;
• driveway entrances, deceleration lanes on Sandifur Parkway;
• the location and appearance of the mechanical building;
• a noise study regarding the go-kart track and types of equipment.
1
James Hale, 1838 Duffy Court, Lake Mary, Florida, Dynamic Water LLC, Project
Manager for Bahama Bay discussed the needs in the Tri-Cities for family events,
family activities and jobs for young people. Mr. Hale described the vision for
Bahama Bay and reviewed the various water slides and feature of the park. An
electric go-kart track will be included in the development. The carts are silent and
cause no environmental impact which allows for the carts to run indoors or
outdoors. The family fun center area would contain a mini golf course, climbing
gall, laser tag and a flow rider, all of which will be available year round.
Mr. Hale anticipates creating 100-150 seasonal jobs mainly for high school and
college students. A feasibility study showed there would be approximately 700,000
yearly visitors to the proposed park.
Commissioner Little asked Mr. Hale about water needs to run the park and what
source would they use.
Mr. Hale stated they would use City water and that the wade pool and the lazy
river would be the largest users of water. He was unsure of the volume of water
needed because the final design was not finished.
Commissioner Little asked about the length of the operating season.
Mr. Hale stated the operating season would be approximately 110 days from
Memorial Day to Labor Day. They do not want to encroach on the schedule for
school.
Commissioner Little asked if bands or concerts would be scheduled.
Mr. Hale stated they have not looked into that yet.
Commissioner Anderson asked for a description of "Bahama Village".
Mr. Hale stated "Bahama Village" would consist of suites like a hotel for families.
Commissioner Anderson asked how many suites were being planned.
Mr. Hale stated it was undetermined.
Commissioner Anderson stated he asked about the number of units to determine
the impact on parking, traffic, etc.
Chairman Samuel asked if Phase One will be lit for evening hours.
Mr. Hale stated yes it would be lit for evening hours.
Chairman Samuel asked Mr. Hale about his experience with this type of project
and if he had any experience on this type of project.
2
Mr. Hale stated this was his first attempt at such a project. He has a team of
experts with experience that will be working with him. He is a member of the
World Water Park Association which will provide assistance on operating the water
park.
Chairman Samuel asked about lessons learned from the Oasis Water Park in
Kennewick.
Mr, Hale stated Oasis had problems such as a static offering. They had a fever slides
and did not upgrade and maintain the slides. The facility was too small. The hours
of operation were too long. Their focus was a place to get wet and the maintenance
and management was not in line with the need. Bahama Bay would be constantly
upgraded and bring in new attractions. They plan on keeping it very well
maintained and to create a family fun environment,
Chairman Samuel asked if there was another facility that they could compare
Bahama Bay with.
Mr. Hale stated there are no facility in the area. Moses Lake, Pendleton and
Umatilla have municipal parks; Silver-wood theme park is in Idaho; there is a water
park in Boise; as well as some indoor facilities in Idaho. There are no themed
private owned water parks in this area.
Commissioner Cruz has visited Silverwood and Boondocks and stated they are
destination scale facilities and are smaller than the proposed Bahama Bay.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing.
Zaryab Sheikh, 15401 SE Mill Plain, Vancouver, WA owner of Sleep Inn stated he
was in favor of the water park.
Shawn Sant, 8016 Redondo Drive, Pasco, WA wondered about the cost of
admission, season passes for families who live in the area and daily kid type
activities. He was concerned about the park closing at 6pm; it would he more
appropriate to leave the park open during the evenings for families to enjoy an
evening after work.
Brian Woodruff, 4421 Mt. Challenger Court, West Richland questioned the trip
counts for the medical facility and the water park.
Mr. McDonald, City Planner, stated for the medical facility the trip count was
5,800 and for the water park 2,000 during the week and 4,800 on Saturdays.
Mr. Woodruff stated the traffic from the water park would not be comparable to the
traffic from the TRAC and would be less than permitted uses on the site. He was
in favor of the water park.
3
Meredith Willingham, 9907 Vincenzo Drive, Pasco, WA was concerned about traffic
as well as the potential competitor in Kennewick. She was not in favor of the water
park.
Randy Gosseen, 4610 Baja Drive, Pasco, WA stated he was a long time Pasco
resident and was in favor of the water park. His main concern was traffic. He was
in favor of bringing in commercial development.
William DeBoard, 7912 Snoqualmie Drive, Pasco, WA mentioned the 60 foot water
slide and his attempt at a 7 foot slide at a park with his grandchildren; he is in
favor of a 60 foot water slide in our area. He felt the water park would not create
more traffic than Wal-Mart.
Jim Noyce, 9419 Vincenzo Drive, Pasco, WA strongly encouraged the Planning
Commission to address the concerns in granting a zoning variance. He also stated
he would like a traffic signal at Midland Lane or Road 92. He was in favor of the
park being open late until 10 pm. He asked staff if the traffic impact was for one
phase or all four.
Mr. McDonald stated all four phases were considered.
Mr. Noyce further stated he would not like to see two defunct water parks when
there could be one successful water park in our area. He stated the park in
Kennewick has financing and complies with the existing zoning.
Chairman Samuel asked Mr. Noyce whether he is in favor or against it.
Mr. Noyce is in favor with some reservations.
Steve Pfaff, 5419 Valdez Lane, Pasco, WA is greatly in favor of the water park. The
area is large enough to provide for two water parks. He mentioned the use of the
City swimming pools and the lack of facilities in West Pasco. He stated there was a
need for a municipal indoor facility to support high school swimming, training,
and meets as well as provide use for the community.
Tara Bevelacqua, 5203 Truman Lane, Pasco, WA works directly under the owner of
the Broadmoor Outlet Mall and was asked to come and speak. They are in favor of
the traffic corning into the area. She also lives near the TRAC and during special
events the traffic is not too bad. They are enthusiastic about the proposal and do
not feel that two water parks would be a bad idea. The two water parks can be
competitive with their prices.
Jim Riddell, 3036 Highway 260 East, Connell, WA stated the water park
development would a benefit the development he is proposing in Connell. He feels
the proposal would be a great benefit for Franklin County. He was in favor of the
proposal.
Pat Roach, 8412 W. Adams Street, Pasco, WA stated he has a professional building
located at 9221 Sandifur Parkway and was in favor of the water park coming to
4
Pasco, however he was not in favor of the location. Mr. Roach would be in favor of
the proposal if the site was revised. He would like the park to be appealing as you
drive down Sandifur Parkway. He stated this type of development was a good idea
and is needed in the City of Pasco, as well as the Tri-Cities.
Larry Powers, 8703 Cord Drive, Pasco, WA was in favor of the water park. He felt
the hours of operation should go later than 6pm. He mentioned offering different
slides than the water park in Kennewick would he beneficial and this area in Pasco
is in great need for this type of development.
Terry Thornhill, 4005 Riverhaven, Pasco, WA stated he has an office located at
9221 Sandifur Parkway commended City staff on their findings which addressed
all of his concerns. Mr. Thornhill stated a traffic study would be desirable as well
as a revision to the parking lot. He stated he grew up in Fife near a water park and
he never heard noise from the water park. His main concern is maintaining the
architectural character of Sandifur Parkway which can be achieved by articulated
screen walls. The suggestion to relocate the maintenance building could be
addressed by leaving the building in the same location and the dimensions and
depth of the building would consist of features which will tie into the fabric of
design.
Mavis Eulie, 9319 Mustang Drive, Pasco, WA stated her main concern was the
traffic. She mentioned the 6 o'clock traffic rush hour and was not in favor of the
proposal.
Mike Clark, 9319 Mustang Drive, Pasco, WA stated he was in favor of a grater
park. He is against the location of this proposal. He felt the applicant was very
vague regarding the question of how much water will be used. He felt the traffic
was horrible and people that live in the Road 68 area use the Road 100 exit to get
home. He would like the location of this park to be somewhere along Highway 395
or by the Highway 395 overpass to the Snake River Bridge.
Javier Ruiz, 5405 Dradie Street, Pasco, WA was in favor of the water park. He
mentioned the team for Dynamic Waters LLC consists of Pasco residents, with
exception to Mr. Hale. These men have roots in Pasco and Mr. Ruiz trusts that
Dynamic Waters has the best interest for the community. He was confident that
issues will be addressed in a positive way.
Loren Hale, 4504 W. Henry, spoke about the traffic and the bus line that will bring
people to the water park.
Mr. Noyce asked if the developer would be required to submit a business plan.
Chairman Samuel stated no.
Mr. Noyce suggested it would be a good idea for the Planning Commission to
require a business plan due to the size of this project.
5
Mr. Woodruff restated the traffic impacts would not be greater than permitted uses
that do not require special permits.
Mary Jo Bowe, 7806 W. 12th Avenue, Kennewick, WA, local real estate agent who
has resided in the Tri-Cities over 20 years. She was very excited about the
proposal. She briefly mentioned community efforts since 2003 towards developing
an aquatic center and not much success due to the many chiefs and not enough
indians.
Shawna Morrison, 728 W. 22nd Avenue, Kennewick, WA, stated features in Phases
three and four are not typically seen in the Tri-Cities and would like the proposed
Regional Aquatic Center to be located adjacent to the proposed site.
Mr. McDonald responded to public comments by stating water and sewer utilities
are available and capable of meeting the demand of the facility. The applicant will
be assessed a water and sewer connection fee which will go into the sewer and
water fund for current and future capital improvements. The traffic impact fee
would be approximately $90,000. The recommended traffic study prepared as part
of the building permit would identify traffic improvement needs around the site
such as acceleration and deceleration lanes and traffic signals. The development
standards require landscaping along Sandifur Parkway. The maintenance building
would need to be incorporated into the look of the neighborhood. The parking lot
entrance would need to be modified and the parking lot would need to be
landscaped to meet the I-182 standards. Relocating the tall slides would mitigate
the noise and the height issues.
Mr. Hale appreciated the positive and negative input. He stated, as a Pasco native,
he wished to relocate back to Pasco. He stated he would revisit the time of closure
due to the traffic concerns and further stated the traffic would be coming and
going throughout the day.
Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Cruz agreed traffic would not be like the TRAC events, and would
be more like waves of traffic throughout the day. He did not feel there would be a
problem, but the concern should be addressed. The taller buildings should be
located to the south. Maintenance for the undeveloped property should also be
included. He was in favor of the proposal and the location was correct since the
site was the 2nc! nexus of the Tri-Cities between Road 68 and Road 100.
Commissioner Anderson agreed with Commissioner Cruz and would also like to
see a condition that park meet the 1-182 overlay standards and is compatible with
the flavor of the area. He further stated he would be severely disappointed if it
turned out like the Oasis Water Park. He would like to see enhanced landscaping
requirements in the parking lot be added, as well as a requirement for more than
one exit to prevent a bottleneck in traffic. He is in favor of staff's recommendations.
6
Commissioner Little asked if the parking lot landscaping would reduce the number
of parking spaces.
Mr. McDonald stated that landscaped islands would take away from parking
spaces.
Chairman Samuel suggested there was a need for sight and sound screening walls
along property lines including the type of wall.
Commissioner Kempf requested that a condition be included to mimic what has
been required for plats with block walls versus vinyl fencing.
Commissioner Cruz suggested adding a condition regarding night lighting leakage.
Commissioner Cruz questioned Commissioner Kempf about solid fencing for
Sandifur Parkway or the freeway or both.
Commissioner Kempf stated both.
Commissioner Cruz stated he was not in support of both; however was in favor of
fencing Sandifur Parkway.
Chairman Samuel asked if there would be any fencing along the freeway.
Commissioner Cruz stated it was not the same type of issue with fences. A berm or
landscaping could add aesthetic value versus a chain link fence and does not want
to require a block wall.
Chairman Samuel asked staff if there was a recommendation on this issue.
Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director, stated the main point
of the freeway uralls have been noise minimization and does not see a need in this
case and might be better served without a sight proof wall so people can see into
the park. A general condition of security fencing and the design would be
appropriate, upon the approval of the City.
Commissioner Kempf stated her main concern was for the security of the facility.
Commissioner Little stated the site was elevated above the freeway.
Chairman Samuel mentioned the overpowering character of the 60 foot tall multi-
colored, non-traditional structure towering over Sandifur Parkway which was
addressed by the applicant.
Chairman Samuel mentioned the exterior and interior landscaping to support the
intended 1-182 standards and asked if there was a recommendation to go above
and beyond the standard.
7
Commissioner Cruz asked whether the interior landscaping standards would apply
inside the water park.
Mr. McDonald stated they would apply to the parking lot and inside the facility.
The parking lot would need be in accordance with the standards.
Chairman Samuel mentioned the need for articulating walls.
Commissioner Anderson stated the conditions should be in accordance with the I-
182 standards.
Chairman Samuel mentioned the sewer easement requirement and lighting
spillage request. He asked Commissioners if there was a need for the traffic impact
study. The Commissioners agreed on the need for a traffic study.
Commissioner Little asked if a timetable could be added to the phases, such as
subdivisions.
Mr. McDonald explained subdivisions time frames were covered by State law.
Subdivision permits expire after five years.
Chairman Samuel asked if a condition was needed for the project to start to
building after two years.
Mr, McDonald stated typically for larger projects the Planning Commission has
recommend two years to allow for financing, plan submittal and applying for
building permits.
Chairman Samuel clarified that the special permit would be for a two year period.
Commissioner Little moved, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to close the
public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of findings of fact, and
development of a recommendation for the City Council for the February 18, 2010
meeting.
8
Planning Commission Minutes
February 18, 2010
A. SPECIAL PERMIT Location and operation of a large scale (27)
acres) water park (Dynamic Waters. LLC)
19600 block of Sandifur Parkway, west of
Broadmoor Square) {MF# SP 09-012)
Chairman Samuel read the Master File number and explained the proposed
special permit had been reviewed during a public hearing. The Chairman asked
if staff had any additional comments.
Staff explained that as a result of the public hearing the applicant was
requested to modify the site plan to accommodate the following: the height of
structures; the concern for maintaining the traditional streetscape look and
appeal of Sandifur Parkway; and driveway entrance and parking lot concerns.
Staff reviewed the revised site plan highlighting the areas that addressed the
Planning Commission's instructions and/or recommendations from the
hearing. The project was revised to be built in one phase and the cabana motel
area was redesigned to create a business appearance along Sandifur Parkway
with a Hotel and attached indoor water park.
Chairman Samuel asked staff if the applicant was aware of and agreed to the
conditions.
Staff stated the report and conditions were mailed and emailed to the
applicant, no objections had been received.
Commissioner Little asked about a traffic study and who would be responsible
for the cost of the study.
Staff stated the traffic study was the applicants' responsibility and would be
required as a part of the building permit submittal.
Commissioner Little asked if the go-cart track would have a noise impact in the
neighborhood.
Staff stated only electric carts would be used, thereby eliminating the noise or
emissions associated with gasoline engines.
Chairman Samuel complimented the applicant on his proposal incorporating
the Planning Commissions' recommendations.
1
Commissioner Little moved, seconded by Commissioner Cruz, that the
Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions as contained
in the February 18, 2010 staff report, The motion was passed unanimously.
Commissioner Little further moved, seconded by Commissioner Cruz, based on
the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City
Council grant a special permit to Dynamic Waters, LLC. for the location and
operation of a water park in the 9600 block of Sandifur Parkway with
conditions as contained in the February 18, 210 staff report. The motion was
passed unanimously.
Staff explained the appeal process for the audience.
2
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council February 25, 2010
TO: Gary Crutchfield, L. kaager Regular Mtg.: 3/1/10
Rick White, ,V.(
Community &Economic Development Director
FROM: Shane O'Neill, Planner I
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT (MF# SP 09-011) 10-Year Master Plan for the location of
portable classrooms on school sites throughout Pasco Pasco School District
1. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Resolution
2. Report to Planning Commission
3. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 1/21/10 and 2/18/10
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. approving the special
permit for the Pasco School District Portable Classroom Master.Plan as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE
III. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On January 21, 2010, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to
determine whether or not to recommend a special permit be granted to the Pasco
School District for a portable classroom master plan.
B. Following conduct of the public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that
with conditions, it would he appropriate to recommend approval of a special
permit for a portable classroom master plan for the next 10 years. The Master
Plan affects the following schools: Captain Gray Early Learning Center, Emerson
Elementary School, Longfellow Elementary School, Mark Twain Elementary
School, Maya Angelou Elementary School, McGee Elementary School, Robert
Frost Elementary School, Rowena Chess Elementary School, Virgie Robinson
Elementary School, Whittier Elementary School, Ellen Ochoa Middle School,
Isaac Stevens Middle School and Pasco High School.
C. The recommended conditions are contained in the attached Resolution,
D. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been
received.
10(e]
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVING A SPECIAL PERMIT FOR A PORTABLE
CLASSROOM 10-YEAR MASTER PLAN FOR THE PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Pasco School District submitted an application for a Special
Permit for a portable classroom 10-year master plan applicable to school sites throughout
Pasco; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 21, 2010
to review the proposed portable classroom master plan; and,
WHEREAS, following deliberations on February 18, 2010 the Planning
Commission recommended approval of a Special Permit for the portable classroom 10-
year master plan for the Pasco School District with certain conditions;
NOW,THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
1. That a Special Permit is hereby granted to the Pasco School District for a portable
classroom 10-year Master Plan under Master File # SP 09-011 with the following
conditions:
a) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
b) Portable classrooms shall be developed in substantial conformity with the
site plans submitted with the application;
C) The special pen-nit shall expire on April 1, 2020.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 1 st day of March, 2010
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP09-011 APPLICANT: Pasco School District
HEARING DATE: 1/21/10 1215 W. Lewis St.
ACTION DATE: 2/ 18/ 10 Pasco WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Master Plan for the location of portable
classrooms on school sites throughout
Pasco.
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Leal: Not Applicable
General Location: All elementary schools, middle schools, and
Pasco High School in the City of Pasco.
PrQ�e --_Size: School sites vary in size.
2. ACCESS: All schools within the City of Pasco are served by one or
more City streets.
3. UTILITIES: All schools within the City of Pasco are served by
municipal utilities.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: Most schools are located in R-1 (Low
Density Residential) Zones. Rowena Chess Elementary and the
new Virgie Robinson Elementary are located in C-1 (Retail
Business) zones. Ochoa Middle School is located in an R-1 (Low
Density Residential) and a C-3 (General Business) zone. Schools
are not restricted by zoning districts. All Schools require review
through the special permit process prior to issuance of permits for
construction.
S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Plan Goal CF-5 suggests provisions
should be made for educational facilities throughout the Urban
Growth Area.
b. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been
issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) in accordance
with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA),
Chapter 43.21(c) RCW.
1
ANAYLSIS
Pasco is one of the fastest growing cities in the State of Washington. The
population of the City has increased by 24,000 new residents or 75%
since 2000. This population growth has increased student enrollment in
the Pasco School District. Within the same time period, the Pasco School
District has constructed three new elementary schools, a middle school
and a high school. In 2009, 467 new housing units were permitted for
construction. With Pasco's household population of 3.3, the 2009
housing starts represent another 1,500 residents. As the population
continues to grow the School District will experience a steady increase in
student enrollment. Since 2000, school enrollment in Pasco has
increased by almost 3,700 new students. There are now about 14,000
students in the Pasco School District.
Increases in student enrollment will create a need for additional
classroom space. In addition to new school buildings, the School District
relies on portable classrooms to meet their needs. From time to time the
School District will locate additional portable units at schools that are in
the most need for additional classroom space. Any major building
construction on a school site, such as the placement of a portable
classroom, requires review by the Planning Commission and the granting
of a special permit.
Because there will be a growing need for additional portable buildings at
multiple school sites over the next 10 years, the School District has
submitted an application to receive approval of a master plan for various
sites. The previous portable master plan approval expires in April of this
year. In Pasco, the City Council has granted approval of master
development plans for Columbia Basin College, Tri-Cities Prep and Kings
Point Christian School.
Every school site in Pasco, and the facilities thereon, has been the
subject of one or more special permit hearings in the past. Each
neighborhood had an opportunity to provide input on school site
development. Most of the special permit applications for recent school
building have included the general location for future portable
classrooms. The approval of a master development plan for future
portable classrooms will reconfirm past special permits and provide the
school with the flexibility to respond quickly to classroom needs at
individual school sites.
2
STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are
initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the
staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to
this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted
during the open record hearing.
1) Schools are generally located in or near residential neighborhoods;
2) The population of Pasco has increased by 75% since 2000;
3) The population increase in Pasco has increased enrollment in the
Pasco School District;
4) School District enrollment has increased by almost 3,700 students
since 2000;
5) The Pasco School District student population has been growing by
about 525 new students each year;
6) Increases in school enrollment have increased the need for short
term and long term classroom space;
7) There are ten (10) elementary schools within the City limits;
8) There are three (3) middle schools within the City limits;
9) There are two (2) high schools within the City limits;
10) There is one alternative middle school/high school in the City
limits;
11) Portable classrooms play an important function in providing
needed classroom space for Pasco students;
12) All school sites and school buildings in Pasco have been reviewed
through the special permit process one or more times in the past
20 years;
13) Comprehensive Plan Goal CF-5 suggests provisions should be
made for educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area.
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its
conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The
criteria are as follows:
1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies,
objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan,?
Plan Goal CF-5 suggests adequate provisions should be made for
educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area.
2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
3
All school sites are fully served by City utilities. All schools in the City
are served by one or more local collector streets.
3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be
in harmony with existing or intended character of the general
vicinity?
Schools are typically located in or near residential neighborhoods.
Schools and supporting facilities, (parking lots, sports fields and portable
classrooms) are an accepted part of the character of residential areas.
All school sites in Pasco have been the subject of past special permit
hearings to review compatibility with neighborhoods.
4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site
design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in
the general vicinity or impair the value thereof
Portable classrooms are minor additions to school sites that have been
previously approved for development and use by the City Council. The
location of schools, particularly elementary schools, encourages
development of homes in residential neighborhoods.
S) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more
objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes
vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the
operation of any permitted uses within the district?
All public schools in Pasco, except the new high school, have portable
classrooms on site. As the student population has increased over the
years additional portable classrooms have been added. These portable
classrooms have been used for many years to provide additional
classroom space for students. The location and use of portable
classroom buildings has not created additional vibrations, dust, traffic or
other conditions that may be objectionable to neighboring property
owners. Portable classrooms on school sites are typically accepted by
neighborhoods as standard school site improvements.
6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located
and developed where proposed, or in any way will become a
nuisance to uses permitted in the district?
Schools are generally accepted uses in or near residential neighborhoods
and generate few nuisance complaints or public health/safety concerns.
4
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as
contained in the February 18, 2010 staff report.
MOTION: I move based on the findings of fact and conclusions
therefrom, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant
a special permit to the Pasco School District approving a ten year master
plan for the location of portable classrooms with the following conditions:
APPROVAL CONDITIONS
1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
2) Portable classrooms shall be developed in substantial conformity
with the site plans submitted with the application;
3) The special permit shall expire on April 1, 2020.
5
' E-!
-CAPINN qRAY EARLY---MARN N
ME97
02r 5wT
..111 Ill
Q
II
I
� � 1
�I
1
b • I
�+�LL Capta$a Gray Early
❑ S e P Learning Center
p -�xiSTiNy Pa�T�bl-� PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO,1
F-�.rnics>� . IQ•sl$ SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
DECEMBER 7,2009
I--2
EMEl ELEMENTARY
West Octave Street
or ng
}!,y+ a J.i q•.}�'rl^'1
}1„ ••° 'r•r ',•, het +,.: `'r:."'-.
.. t>..� r�;� �.yr1 c+• r+�.i�tn, C'.•:,�.I j•,:,••�:� Fw�rf1 f,�.t+i..
r,>R. t:�:.,,•:. r,�:i',J..l:t i''kti2in"✓r"t�f^i t�cr r 4 !re : ♦{4'1S+tier�?
.+��i�:•.:,:r �,;Y�•' •^�,:r..'r',�r:1co.. +•f:e 4:.r r i; �rr •f t r;yl a Ys � 1
.•�'ua:•'' ,iyF"'J�.^::: t�•f' t� k..;7i�•AZ�` �J �i rL: '
M. r,t::5 ,.r tt 1 •c k�•
r'.�'., }tip>v•Y •�i:a6v.. its#. 1 !i4.�� �:� •'J p
.a t..�• .tii ..rJ4 .. �i41 .5err,.:
' •7 .ti ..'-. e�,�r,.,.,.t'.l�•• r..•r� 'Y. .• , •. � t�;a.r..r ..,rr •,,..')'e,.
`r.`i 1ti��C+����',ir�r.^!,� ?�6 iZ:r�''`• ie fit., n'• ,>'i.�.7f.��?!,�i�:�a'�t.'?�•'t'+x`^�ir�a�?��.r•:.X•••.y.
/,i t�•r• I i: r
r �•;w•�.ie 'lr T.E^I,+�••1..... •�,Ci`r�ti rri >T.i�! `•. r• a �Y�i _'
n,Jr ^�t}c1 ''v`.. .�,� 's'1•'h4>,K'�'.s{:�. .!r >t f• . r�r2 .t.h T '�1..' ! 1�••S••
i:•t: •. oYr..4ti.�'.,,+ .:•`' f�tf„�:S'!.e'..,ny.t.�9:. .tw•.',..s�.''A•�X��i iC. a:'�4�:�,?:,\�i`v,�..•.
J'r: '� ,.. .rt•'+:i• .rsr •:.:Y n:.•.qy' •r •y r• sr:$•'❑.t:'. +• •'. : ;�+ -.:':,r
.�•. :�,.,`Fi+� :ie•"�.it' r+� '`;u}J7a+'v.�, ':�i�,:.ev.•�.�t:, •q ':u•::+,: is .�..��'•� '.4.y�.
!�~ •' } 1,1.:1 'is. ^ .VA'J-.1.J i,'•r••t' ''1 •'�\ `5}.y.• ::••.j'�la :'r'+�Ir
'..'ti•4• .�t.1V5.'� >',•.�/ `s .�f.•]. '!i•4f�+��.t.h'., ^�'.�• •. � i."I.f.•• Y'
yk' l•}. ..�".:,.ii,5..::'�.. irY.•>�,.•r•C.. :':l' ry'rr'i''.1''..ii:.••.r:i•.i•� ... :.
•1J'1'i�•✓+>�.•.•t,ti,ti.V•i �.i r. 3'., 1' iAj,J�.y.,'1�1f; ,.�I :•• Jh. +.::;;�: �'
�lJ v <t{ $!•r •�.`1C t�,.s r 1",�t •r rt `q/
liy4r. ,t �, Y'�J'))}`�,,I�ay'1,f Cr,��•,+ft ti fir• S45i�:�. `'J�•r,>nri:•�� ��:f+r- _—.•.•�'--"'
{ q:,'' " Emerson Elementary
Site Plan AKg^-A,G Ar-KY-5
PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.4
F- FvrTa �r<St SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
DECEMBER 7,2009
E.-3
•�� ; • - �� Ste/
,
t '
P.
P, P
P
14
..rte � l��TU�rc To sTe.3l�
p"^ Longfellow Elementary
Site Plan ARF SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.
ON
P -FAIsrNj rOM-rr',BLE DECEMBER 7,2009
F - fi-rj mrT- ?eorr�aLE
1T11I"►[''►�`�- = eat°I"►��°Y Gr.G�fYE�f�f E d"`sR S `- I
I. I
I North load 40 nz �
1 I ••fin' +J,� � r� r .L{•
y1, ',. ,• �'\a•, . ��, J. +,~•ar• r 1 /0, :J f L,�L• 1.,•y„M'rr�-
i tj} ` 'c �-� ,�;+.'. 1 ,tJfl4f'•b• f.. rJt ti 1 �.. �fr7�1 �1'�s
Y .7 0 � t- 1 .r' t..• rd•'�•4.1.';h' is ,,;,��. .t 4 <. -•! {.
.1 `' . ,.�.1 .�1 i`f`s 1 .,li••_�:i:l,��!-.
st rt. ]; 1:.{•,• 4•'iJ ri .1 A”-Z. y• „. L1r, J.{
*,a' - r: ly ~'• r F '.+d 3x; _5•.'J;'.� , r y r' ) �-. .: -
r• :t'a'ck �'N 1L �-1•,,^^�� J•, r
a.t i +t ., ,�. :r>`r :F is 4+1rt +v!< .,�•{. .`r�}n•
�,;••. -- �•+ t� .. •�,,�Mr� �JC � .21.1•:. '-ice w:,1��)�� :;vx.r+x���'4r;:vim, {:•.• .i.: A
y.rl-�i yr, r erR• E r�r% r Ei:".X'r t -?'r.�C•!•`4:x ie. 'r' Z .
f, `t,.,• '� ,..5: �, 1., i c, r.. .'lrl,t,,t,:.' ,� .1'•"'E�4 r'lx ;r'J!' ��
. 4- , 'ti •+ 6>rp ,! �1:�1f,1,'J.a K•fl-.r k��r(`.S• 'y. ti
•��r!• 'y,� , '�'!,t�L YV:n:4:•'j ♦''�.4n+ ��' .J
-+� 7 ?•;'tit�,;: t;r. } 1--�1;'a-•da:• Syr i.,sf•f''nir, �3,��r 'ti-r
��!y'^C.;'7.i�.v1.,.. 1�2:i.'}."•:• -�3 �ti, � �`ri•:^. ✓.. Z:�,-� ..f7�•-r?.44,1+
:�. ,S^`v�'' 1,i}.1 r1::•'i•;Zl`. Y;.,r}'v:I^�,�t r-+r�- zs[ �.f:{�.',�•5'<•\i",,ii:i ;''\mo t�'_' JF i'�.r, P. r.iiti,;::t%h�F: M<5a!•5.•�:.'''6'a-i�+i.k♦r i,rr'nc4-r*i.fiWr "VS':
-st't 44
.
i]..'S%��..Sns7'1"•;+ ''i...+tti ..:;G�.;,t°'s.•� ya •.1,�,Y,
art 1., ..+-..L:it � ,,,•, J. , 1an1y Fl
r u cX•4 , 1 a t r' +- •r vr.i..A114• '
Y rr. •,J'•�. j- 1
A. t a � +:}<; it t ;.ti•a.. �'('•fs�i�.s r r) �i:,••'r'r�•!A'•"
> .(.3 i ! 5 j11r•{"l4rr'+{};�.,�;�•,�.t'.
�-'} � L 0. s to r• v, t a r t iii.#.4?j,. .°•.
«� 'Z r e;• r°f x. v"' •.'>•+1•+: rr•a•:,+•-4
�{ twa ti ,4 + ,- 7 .f �,re .. r• ,,. {..'nn i .. } J t �LL!l��{r'1'k-yS 4•�.iSVr 11r
, +rT �..`+L� +' �� r.,\a {1,�.: .r .. r } 2 + r _ ar`3{�! n� y ]; ',\��•'i.;,;d•y5>ira•`•r,✓, +
r t {� - z .+s.r •f• 1ir.:rt.et�t71 1 1.j v�` ��*.'^": l r ,�� �i Y•Ys•, � '
�:{r f 4 4 s �r�• i 1 to s tsr. r1 i.r•, a s.. ,
t t V
tr rt { k •� ! 4 r�� r`aa�ft a �t�1 tiw',•w�ti r�r{�� Y 1 >�rt4t t L
�.r P rl+ a;•-+' �. v '9 ! .Y *�r:i !3• �Y 1 ,.}a✓ Jar •+
'N'.'
x \ 4r S i s t'S1
rK J.4 Ret �r,R ,. r=rri' tl '+? �},1 i.}73•' �\4 \ � }1tf rp.r � .r4?•�•c J i
`,: -� `,z*,�d i:z.,•;: , fir', �+ L. !}i.Ft�e r-fps ai 3r,;'S i r.,.. l' ;"F ri.
�a � r u. rip��((��''`` �',{�y��{'•�• ,{+ 1 vt..c4 1 y5+: r ! n x '�ti�- �Y r� tsa^�3
�,LY "•':1 'I t •f" 1 , Y�/� i^A4�.� ,:f4;4; `L^1 , r-'"C 1.y A;'S;,• .
•.IZ+S.j`.^jk� tli S -}�.1r:r• .�r f.l r ` 4 :1.4 •�5..}rp .t -� "y• Y �'g:^:� I
.N+ A•.,.v IM1t.C':laz": .Yk;n • •e,>,.5.,� r �';a<4:rwr'�.ri �t.](.+�';>•, •S`ir';�.�.�'�)rr.�; ,•�.rs,•-r
J • .>.�,.L,.1. \r4� r 11 • y4 \'r r.'-�ri' .. , i.A j5�1.•'�4 r�iYy-. �'t'.' ..Ji
''t,;• ),a •r'•' '.� "4$L�J<`y A 'L .•hJ�;` •';4 f`;i�+'; .f {l.,Ar K� {+"1a,+'k."<�,•Y, ..a-�;i�''i° Twain
;}'r.+v; �:�.._• r -.f. 4 [- _ Mark Elementary
PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.I
Site. Plan SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
P - -•Fr•-+Y i 6 Ti rn� r0R,7AF6L E• DECEMBER 7,2009
-MAYA ANGELOU ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
a pf
W
Parkl
74,
le
VIA,
fly*
Br
Mark Twain Elementary
PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.I
Site Plan ^"v_:!, S PIECiAL PERMIT APPLICAVON
DECEMBER 7.2009
Lk
McGEE ELEMENTARY
1�•:rr1 4
� •T •l
•1,r ,
1• ia!�i•'•1-r::;' {�<:a;..+�4D aY..:,6,,y:y� ''t' �'-'y Q F�
• 7•he .:1 r 1 i-4'�is.' :.,.:4 w'.i. .�.S.r -
f• ��•!'� :p"-, •1 Cry:{•'..'!v�1.` •'i:;� '��'l;r;'�..:yj!•r,`�Vi Yr-„IAtiI�:•,.�'r
�,,r..'vr;�}L;�S ivi�{'IFS;f..:r 6�-•l+L,��:•ii<::k^.�•s 's 1+�i..a`.' nr:.•.�
Z
A }i,r;�C ��t.' •4,5�4'•;:fe'K'4'.c iR�:-''.a�.5 l,� :y:":.r.•:
^:YC. •.r �e..yi'!*, �.,.5!%t-1:S yr\jrlss��3•L LF,.An,.•y:y :Ha.h:h'r:�'�
'i.'y.�Yr�•{.nn;y.•'ti',•f:.�!/.,r.::'�•.S•t''.;•s::,.•,•t•�;••rµa'•S:+�c�;: :��i:!'.j' S� '4-�
•r%{3`^-s7 :,':': 5:^��•c;s.Si” '•i'.:�.y�...�yaic'°"' 'a:.•r'•�' '�:i.:ra' �l� 1
��:;.' .'�':. -^'! .,L 'Y'.d"v.::.r Est t•;;.K'•4,; .'1'�t;••t•'.��1•�' .r s:^ '
Q :1••t:��;:.;iJ'Jrt,•:5•q=:•:- Y•• V4•. �. - •:u1:•.. e.`'�':ny'':;^'�•°i- +•
;a i•.:�}'.r::;,.^.;�,,;- Piry y:};'� �a Fl,•L.• .,.T�,x•,`:..-•.,• �i 1•r.���::'
..�4:`%t��,.�>.ry'.•' 1+•,_'Ae��Y�y.:'�5.�'"s?4;•4,x•. '-r"•''e,:7'..�.<i•':.':1'-' ���5•...tti.
hr 1,.:_-�:;.�.�.F.,•.. 1°':.:.,.;.<�i.a, -.v��;: • ,:k.�_;..;,.s+:...:_• ;',x. •. M('C'ree F1eIIIerit8ly
Site'Plan PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.i
P. -F—x 57Nc pvRTC15LE SPECIAL PERMITAPPLICATION
7 _ �'" � DECEMBER 1,2009
ROBERT FROST ELEMENTARY
• --- �::'�`�—..._...- ice` ----= -----"--- ----------"�--f
Fit:it• �k,•:°pii'�s :i;'::y,
•G _ L`�.'° 'Nbt�r r t.e..,...l:.1��I.r;.;?h;,Sr.�:�r•"•r�
A o t
4 � � :r• , Y t rr.,C! y+i, n.�'�t+j' r 4i. �i;� rJ }
Fy, t+�,��_•�t��. �.I'J l_jrjT}y, ai�T4 r 'Y'.�CG 7 Jli
O : Pt lh.r 'yy., tl4f r rf 6e ; .Ji"t
5 1r: lrrV r N Sri,?tin:;Z'i f1w, F
1yYt IL'y r f!•tttl,.1_ � 5f/ �;�..�J;h„la,.�v''•.I!' 4 rr
I f °� -` i 11� r�y t F r �ir+{v 1 r "4`�r C \•?,,.-�a`�T�J`
I 4 .i .. ..J ' u•i 1, f. k�k$'S4�19F � �}lL:tr:'r:K' e:.r',n �t
ti r s rt"v, tL r 2t
y 't n r b y "+4 f'•+ �Lr +
+' c� :�� 4 yrt rvi:i t Irr •� \.y,, L1.,�J
5 J. lap S tt�i i•?:5
•.. � -.r (y+t1: lv �,rw yr {+ s. t .:L'7y•T�'S;•C'>:1 r
y�. � r �7 Y•`!i r�.3�..rip�i,>:.S y.K;r.rY,!+ ti
. � °�." 17 lr:.� r.L k,J 't 'k•:%y: yt�i�cYl'e
ti ',l rtl+.- .}, .A f .rl .r:,5 .4t T `1 i�.�•:+ '
r ^si ••:r.�- �I;`.. •,�.�li�';�y�?�'rar•.�`-'.�''Y'r:tr'.Y5ie9::.i..:..•
ti, i?�• .;Z�:;.11': '.+`„r •rr J• ,.3�:+�C}r'1.1w CF,tC�'i,
' ,I+',':k,' :�.kt'.;t�-1;., ^,;}:ii+w:f:��•+14�^�Jij:,:e+�;'m,'{'y'
%'yh,v.C�''Cw..4'•`�ry'`• ..:V•��.•r-?•✓�R$:i r'iJ•'•p: yi;1t::1.!
�(((r';; .n`.:ra�.�'y� > p• S•'� ti� �:'tic �.�iyl•:,\;5'.•,�•
-_ - Robert Frost Elementary
r
Site Plan PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT N0.1
p - �xisTING I'oR'�-�84 SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
-�T,,*Z DECEMBER 7,2009
ROWENA CHESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
•.,, 'J .�` ..r...yz... r:�,,19,x,?;'n��•�V'.'�L':r.1'... y...r, .-'�' >.;t•: ..
..L,>.: . •.V'�C xt +r' ..j�.t.,.'P>il.r'•,.•��'7.r�•�',.e,,'• .:'�•.-;� a��.t.IrKa�
'i� r �•71�'^-.,�- �� i �' �•?'.,'f°•,7.,'eZ`,.. .,'i `r.i.�•~"t :ti.i.•u'i•�ir'.1��+1f]"1.1" 'w.""""'+`'•.�ti
�J{i�'�.,e.'._r.{'• ,i�'e.�4 � .. .'��,; .Sy,.e•t,r.'•.�p. , r,. p,•. _. t
.at.• "^•,�%k.,y,r ;•i. ti .,r.•,,,,>: .t'. •.Y�.1 C_4::' h::-"•_ 6 :T., °ro
r'.. rr• ��.
-r•+��)', .i7 .r'�. � t•C,i`{'tf�C:9'�•`, '��.,ol:?;., F:...C�4`y Y. ��:Y:.' 'a 1��',
+. , �r• ?' I�`rlr' •11" 1 .,� >..��' �1+5'# is+'i').�.! u �.i., ,n
';}: :i<n Pt (1' :l'. I���,:a`, ''•,•+tdj r. +:lT , iE:t� ..n Ar:�
•5 x tr•`'tr•'p �;>s ta,;s.,• `�'?'F :t •{,.;". �"ri^a t,. t- r;: � �.>i�.i r• .) '{.'+v' .'.
'•"r\' �tfl'{•. `' 1 ia.v s.:1.:.Y. `t :•Jt•" `.i!'}y�TYttti�:''•(• '�i�:�qqq•���; ..�.r.,. ,
�t%`. ..R� ':'�rt�i. �'F.! i9.���`.° ^l -��'.•}�:.i 1. �.s;!tt;''"},)ii5'J14 •t'r7 "Y.4,r :}a 1'l•��1, n }
' �,;�;•.''f:.i•' � :r.' '.�.r.. _ '�,i',�.`,. ..r•F:a-:,s• •>•:�..°:5��•51,:.x'',, >•y5"°ii•rFtr'�';'^°'.It } .
'+� "` ,zd'�° •��' •'.i'A.F,..�'p�{:�ti�' !� :�Kt{,.' J•.•�, t{,.'M'r' rJ. .S."' '
P1/ •• Y.:f%:ti -'•t';r t;J.•..�rY.�.\s.'.:•. � ,,'r�''• ti�' +�.�• 'P ft Yr���t .;
'4::. �!'�ti{c• i p ,. r..::.5�.� .F.r .k 1.4,".�i.' t�> r}•�")r,�... ).. yil M.;t, t 1r".. T,•i•r
:.•�.`c•...`:.'Y•_-_ r.,,v.;4 t•�.. r.V:a':a -:eky, '" r .�• +t _t"'•'�.t �iM1l`:
S .1...... w i'S.Y.a•. a•. �i •,tiYi tiSt�i:•' .'r. ,t'.?•Y't}��fii.f A• "C;"4:•+ '� y.
4 w> _ `•? ,•••tF"�e`�.• +x•i,al+.C+;,<. i�f!� 'r �' e3'r`N•4i`r,y�-C�::r�•�, )
`+` �::l,Y.'•i.„�._ '...'r:u i°':iii.=•ti v.'hC�ti t,�g..}•. ..+5_.., �.;L''',�f.Y:. ?yt.�'�,' %T•,y;>,1,_,, r
w• r':a ,
,1J ,. r�:5l'f };, •... ., +'�.':. _�.i1:. t,i��'l:i�s:
rl .■�.'i-
.4'. ',j _•y'uvt��:• .'r�St.2:'t� '•�'!!•nn�)��krt,.��,.
.r`r. .•�,ti i1 r .1. '•y� `���?:C'+ 1���1�`1'C>�ac�.,a-`'Y,�w,'?i�. 'vti :•� •.t
Y1 � :S. } FS �i� r. ')'s•f4:••:>�1csl+;'!.I!}fi rl�,����t;.l "
Oc
•n`_. h ,• . „SKK�A�'r�4!.yM`..r'el,..y.,'„•� r• r,r 15,• •`
p p
•�_'= : 't; •-:art'; .�,.e1!2t:'t Iv4?: .:J��.�.t:cC 2!
Ve
Z1 _ ) (� 5' iii,. }'4'< •S :3i r.
•�J. r . Jr�K.F J•"ice, le is E�#yy�cr,,,',;�f'.3,�'�+x.h;.1:i���t..:S r,
t:•;,ail:;'"�>.'/t '.,.1' .f�L}: .5i ;': `t j:li�:�:�".T�:t��t`�M�4�,ra s>��ar•�a.
i• � r .r}p'JJ:.n• ...,,'Lt' �,) t .y�.' .�t's� ij M,.r; •.. <' }.+�•�'.�'
vr�It� •'e �Ham"4th F:f� (�t�tl'ty�Ql"p�'+s•b r
i1>rrl vi.L,
+ .✓lrV'� ./.'`,�'yr,� i
LIN
Parkhig ?.E" a' lJ7T '.K
•^+ b t .t^ fli .il!,�`p` Ci•.. �#"'y�'ti:o�r"rs
1 { r;,•t'Yy S{sN,[yIt '^=t'`;i?" t•F t.)w`e
XF i>A`` +'P,>�t �Ye irrt�'f"tt•'tr
t � :F�a�w ry Ji + 4i.t+•�� + 1t r. �i
C!'ri�TS;j'u
_ ...t '•:_ �� iD•1>{d.'�tii+ic!i^�1'�+y y,rLl 'j's s' 'fit
,,r �.4'jJS.•(•. }1 f,t• »�'n',�'r Rowena Chess Elementary
'•'`., 1'�-:..f..Z..� 'rz'..•}„"+l�•CK1T�er f:�y1�!y�.y ��.
tt@ Putt PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.i
P -KA!3n'N j a07A 5LE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
e
: -�rrt.<z A=r-s3ii DECEMBPR 7 ")WO
'���.�����. _ �.,7y� T'•r$• ��- .'Vi'``a '
` ,^i ��'�'iyy��[�••1��{•�i'J►i'kT�1�v1��!-� �`�r�,Zyy;�x e1LII• ;�^ �: .•h
♦ C��WitS_ �' •;�?.,-�' �'�,i�C fyl�t6` �'
1- T� � t-1;, rr k��r •,B y�+�y t
-
� y ��,t?t e1 it�ii��+�`i��'�ti • s{t�Cl sA�� y �^a��
�.� t�.,•'�i�4���v�� �cif.•`��.•
all
µ
�.-Ia
WHITTIER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
.. R r. •, •ti.t
v � o f i r\�5.
r o � \' � L,y f Y ♦ G xS � yr - r ,.,
v r t. t t < Lv 4 Y�"4�e' r vv ` a .Ze .t
.0 4 1f
t_:' � jti i? ,t l �': 1,'r ii•]tf-e+.•s h. ,"�'!i:z 1 �. � _
K,.r„• r., F a ..r _
•,i,� x �.�tC,y:C� t\t J:� � e+''��tia'y t•'�"s�' x, a ., ,4z. ,
x'z 1i a 1 t •�tnt rj>>�$"•'! I L {r s. X4:1
.r k r�.� \ ..��'.+� �S±fir, h}S1>`'`�6+•rf�\�}kr��� fi.%{t' .rY ,trF J� _.t
..0 7:l.�i•• h 'a�i `tA +, vN� haa�r �, 1n .tq.ZrjLilrtt,>.•sN-1 -e�ri �•✓<`
r �v :jw t kr>J y c.. s r : $, '`'r4F^ aft '�.�'''•i- •
1 .r. :;"•,°•♦v tc �t( rr sEU •'F. �r rV 4: r ))fir} Ft+.
..}`4'i� y �t y.. ) 4 Y„ +tr°o'er, 4r5 t Y ra{h p, �;°I� �•'.
ei\...Yfl i�` t �" t; ��'4'Y h �� '� . \:fir; n �� 1 •J.
'{:• tta t J,:C v-Y ��l,�. t 1°'yy_ ♦ r.�kv t 1 ti.•';rW. S rr..�tr,S�b% Yle•:.}f r ^r
Z. �• s��i`>: r � h�>r.s(� •� �� � : r�°JZ�C��. d}.�` 4 'fi •�r r I
•i��:i?}J ;t�.�.b1 :^� .f,•1 K. � �> r °j., 111:3'}l t Y:j�ra.•1J .i• � -
�`�^-'j i;,^:` 5�,�€�$�I: �tl�T•a Yt M1t'�r k:�'• �.5: :,J�w?r.1' 1s•ra�t ••J .'.- r n r ,
r.:4 r 1 F^ J: r r
•r r�. y`.g.•�J`:., 4.s^S.kn. r;rt,:kiYY�n'� i A
�Sy.:4r+rr.t"•.t°L`C} 4:.:1,�!: �� r;� N :_n% rte ::
1 � •Yi.l'� �� r� r. :�" � : J
;. ..�{,�,��'•r Vii.? .;i*�.f:;�vai�,3 �1•j�!+�7,� t� ,c ng�;
'4.,'r 1.V.4 ��. \.�n:,(rS+;wl �•< •i � �ti-,e .
.rYr:�'e Q t 1'�ti�rr:�t'}��•�k•.}:r.>}`.:t�'r iV �r k• ,•A � ,.,
qi•C.r'i�^`fy\s4't;1•.1�`r+ y}'�.r�yxJl`7,•Y� �p` p �' �••f nS 'e,r+ ...•1� „
,� r'�.�\�yyy,,, �.,r W 1�N�•yC�! !a� �.S J r t
n F- '�`Y r�. n ,}P�r'r:�' d ••<, 1��,r=i f' � ;•i,•.�J•. .4 t�i
�+3 yy r° �1
L,,�1'•�fi' ;a• r
;•. ''J'� J`> i Y.r`tx c'+'' ay%ii�`Yti �'' >t uy ty r
J t..i•t tii''�i��h •S 1.. }_y S., y' u'v
J s}'t�Jj,( 1\' '. +?�.�r,dh{:'';Fr4s�'��'Ri�f `.�i+' �r,"a y��'� 4�. :, '..
.;�,�i..Fi;r4 y:F}'S�r,.t; j�1,r�,f,°j����_"(,t�.+y�•'yry:1�� ^u �~j•ti.«t i i
i 1 F'�i t �� rlr�A Yt�, t44� , r�•.—•`T�"���.L'l,w`� h .l':l iTi.1,".�..±SYJ' >'. �i
,f'�.:>..ry r..:..: C•. v''.. "� .V�If(!`t'. ;VT?�i, T..` /J. . 'ti; ...•F, ly' t •r^
a �
.r rr r� J t,
-tti," �. `; ;'ipt:�aF `,�.�����C i �j a 1 tL X :h
r..,�iw-ti: f 5,, r:.�tr a'� .C' t� 1 i�t�rryrrffrs!' � ,�I� •r r ;r�'r>. h•.ric•'C,Ti,��„' 4. . .
yit ii:J'��%''e4r�'.e.h�4r.;rrrYi,��i�CAY�.- rf�/;�+�lf�F:N..� •F:`,• (j, yr� 1. i.fit' j tt ?.�
�t r. ;$p i rt � f �r r ;:!WyS �r.,1 r �.��rtx. r`•�iy.,, �J�'. .
tr i•'tggt ri!�.>'>�'11+{''.ti?y�w:�y�.}:�i� 1'ri.4��•rtMfr'�. 'i� i�r>.}tiI''[!,141:1•'i6� j �•�ff�y �! �!.1.��G;�.Yi 4.}'�i :4 i A t”°�i c i
'et,•kc•,S1�'1 .'e'e•• >r•.a Y Y:r• .a•1 :.t• •.. �. ^l'0 .S:�rT r. � .5�•i, �. �'�.
�t�fF; � .r.'' 'Y::r"may,•...- .r. �+ .. >. .:�>•J.�nJ.•:.>.<.rti� <w:W-v.� J...:.,q• �J.r aJ-t
. E.Broadway St.
.4"i `T`�`T"f':;�^�_ '.f: •' '�^,, �`jit:;J'-i•.r�..�...:+Lr`r�'i .r:ri .•`,�i j� - '• ice.
;; ' •^ . n' s•, r:,: a` ;'y; Y.` ;?+ Whittier Elementary
tar= _� � , ,'� x: •:}.; •�•� •,,?
SSite PIan AIF-4�'+' im j0r lms PASCO SCHOOL,DISTRICT NO.1
P. —�?SfsTTlJcpQ1��r,LSLE SPECIAL.PERMIT APPLICATION
F _FurW o�t:aaCE DECEMB_R 7,7009
• • 1 AL s
oXi�kYatX# #• quip $ r a•�QE�pE+ak rpki�pE u o 'a a opE #
�V @mow � # - w �, ,♦ •` J�+��C� `•�j L:i� Mf�s<YY�}•1'� .�•�.
' – -..� 4��. €�� ;s y T�,–!1w'�.�ir,�G I�TAS�.y� '��r. ��C �•''�,y:!'L'�•' .�•• •Y-'+ i,[C�~
�Ti"�— ci try�1' `��• a R• •a s1'�`
� a� �RVhy r�i±• -r-c. �.,J .�ayni*.°.,w•'�f s �i'3v.,-�'«�;.. �� f"�',J��'
.��Sb"�:�'l� o�'�p'i".��� ,%����,� ,_'.` ;v�'` Jt:n'ft���^,�s�:.`� �5�``�o � �krsF'j••�',
�1
1, " � Jy(•ll �
Fj
�p ,tJ+, ! �,f-]' �F-,z !• F �� n� Ia;11x.
�• .�! � '- � ryTJf.:Je ^•`��e��'f��,,y,a�( 4A.fCt._ � TL. Ar-�
-5
r • ss r - •
- r ri•
ISAAC STEVENS MIDDLE SCHOOL
�-•.Q�. ..�r_i.i: _ -:l-.'. .. -a�-r-t:a�:�C-i...::is'__�_.._...y.:r.:.....,.,r� -�a.i_ti�.r..-.,..__.....
North 24fh Avenue
.� �a,>. Z, y,•;,`,,. :rt ``. ..,, 7 � sY� t rs Zr,Y , , �.
I..�r, ` ',S + } e L}�_•ua�LLV.�t1y•r , �s,Ft its c�.�t i r { , , .I•' , J-
I , rQ �1 �� Nl,J R 4 Fl1�k �•,' q � �7,'i r ^ ,. ,1
I1 s ,� •� ,� 1� ?�1•t�ii?lS.,t�,•,asy'�t: .?u7i ..c'ia...,'�, • A
1�` ;r tz }" .5�. .E �4•`�z/I, L,l..{.4r�•'•tr;.. .r..,:.. �.� :t �ti ,,i
vae c Y.:1F'SstAlt .l�{.J "•'
^..�,;%��:.SS:,k:.s1'�!'�'':tira'iv.`•t`�: f.'��'L f�k �•' �`<N p P .' `'' ;•��: '�:.
`%.., a4�d 4}�L�`�� ''�r���} •j:-. .�S y+..1,�•1•i:�•>.i,F {�.:r:...0-r.%.r�.��. J r.'' ;.i `
r. .��.i rtir •l ail' !. �i--�,i:k3�4�"���t..' ......: << .iiu a:•,q { p�(�j��{}jy}
,s i. i r•a.•�z; t:� i.• .ib•aa•:•3" t Fc�":•!•.i'.�=!},:r�..� '1 ._ ,��RfM7�j!!•Pi .
• Src i•,,y�A''f1.\j�4L.:' �_z, �'tt s•..r `t �a r � .tf .;ti :_
• J' 4".il N r ,`�,J14,,T T > ,y < a J•i,l,
: : a`tier° rt9 a,, • :_.�` — —
,. Iy �. a
ROM
plarkin
Dss 'j ,fife:, ; �,: • Y�
• R i�A.'y J; w ..V�.r�TJ � .�r
r ,
'North 22,w Avenue
Isaac Stevens Middle
IV
x.'�.-L.�. :.r tJ Y�•, .3Y«j�.-•��:il.j�i::a.' .i.:c=�: :._ ` :is.,..��h�-�v:i�-;��s___•,y..s'i.�•`��• _� �•�
Site Plan IKEA ^ 29.5 ACr( F_5 PA5C SCHOOL DfSTRICT NO 7
r EMUS f� SPECI AL PERMIT APPLICATION
r)F(',FMRFR 7 7rinq
Ira-�
PASCO- HIGH SCHOOL
lldii Ji
IMF
II
f;
P. f
{
L .
U U 11
0
TIf�111 III 111111111111 fill 1WINU{fffffmfff
}�I1�"HifY ��''�� 11AH'E
-��
West Henry Street Pasco High
Side Plan `s Aces PASCO SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.1
-FJCi Sri I�Po1�1'AblrE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION
P.- u�1R i�ors3�eS DECEMBER 7,2009
Planning Commission Minutes
January 21, 2010
A. Special Permit 10-Year Master Plan for the location of
portable classrooms on school sites
throu bout Pasco (Pasco School
District) (MF# SP 09-011)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments
from staff.
Staff explained the application applies to 13 sites throughout the City of
Pasco. Separate site plans have been submitted for each school. The
Pasco School District was previously approved for a portable master plan
which was to expire in March. The only school not included in the master
plan was the new Chiawana High School.
Commissioner Samuel asked for comments from the applicant.
Kim Marsh, 1215 W. Lewis, had no comments.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing; after three calls and no
response, the hearing was closed.
Mr. White stated the School District has done an admirable job in the
placement of the portable classrooms.
Chairman Samuel stated he was under the impression that with
Chiawana High School there would be a dramatic reduction in portables
at Pasco High School.
Mr. Marsh stated some were removed from the annex in the fall which
became the Captain Gray Early Learning Center and the entire senior
class remains at Pasco High.
Commissioner Cruz moved, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to
close the public hearing and schedule deliberations, the adoption of
findings of fact, and development of a recommendation for the City
Council for the February 18, 2010 meeting.
Planning Commission Minutes
February 18, 2010
A. SPECIAL PERMIT 10-year Master Plan for the location of
portable classrooms at several public
school locations in Pasco (Pasco School
District) (MF# SP 09-0 111
Chairman Samuel read the Master File number and explained the
proposed special permit had been reviewed during a public hearing. The
Chairman asked if staff had any additional comments.
Staff had no comment.
Commissioner Hay moved, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to
adopt the Findings of Fact and Conclusions therefrom as contained in
the February 18, 2010 staff report. The motion was unanimously
approved.
Commissioner Hay further moved, seconded by Commissioner Anderson,
based on the findings of fact and conclusions therefrom, the Planning
Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the
Pasco School District approving a ten year master plan for the location of
portable classrooms with the following conditions. The motion was
unanimously approved.
Staff' explained the appeal process for the audience.