Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-16-2009 Planning Commission Meeting Packet PLANNING COMMISSION - AGENDA REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. July 16, 2009 I. CALL TO ORDER: II. ROLL CALL: Declaration of Quorum III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 18, 2009 IV. OLD BUSINESS: A. SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Community Service Facility in a C-1 Zone (3901 W Court St.) (Planned Parenthood) (MF# SP 09-005) B. CDBC Program: 2010 Annual Action Plan (City Wide) (MF# CDBG 09-004) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of an Autobody shop in a C-3 zone (1603 West Lewis St) (Gustavos Olivas) (MF# SP09-004) B. SPECIAL PERMIT: Expansion of a College/Technical School in a C-1 zone (5278 Outlet Dr.) (Charter College) (MF# SP09- 006 C. SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Corn Maze/Farm in a R-S-20 Zone .(2000 Block of Rd 76) (Philipp Schmitt/Haywire Farms) (MF# SP09-007) VI. WORKSHOPS: A. Code Amendment: PMC 25.58 1-182 Corridor Overlay District (City of Pasco) (MF# CA 09-001) B. Sub-Area Plan: Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan (West of Broadmoor Bvld. north of Harris Rd) (City of Pasco VII. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Rivershore Plan: Rivershore Amenities Plan 2009 (MF#PLAN 08-001) B. ADJOURNMENT REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Todd Samuel. POSITION MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT No. 1 Todd Samuel, Chairman No. 2 James Hay No. 3 Andy Anderson No. 4 David Little No. 5 Joe Cruz No. 6 Ray Rose No. 7 Tony Schouviller No. 8 Jana Kempf No. 9 Vacant APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS: Chairman Samuel read a statement about the appearance of fairness for hearings on land use matters. Chairman Samuel asked if any Commission member had anything to declare. Commissioner Cruz stated he would recuse himself from the Special Permit Application for the location of a Community Service Facility in a C-1 Zone (MF# SP 09-005) because his wife had written a letter in support of the application. Chairman Samuel then asked the audience if there were any objections based on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness questions regarding the items to be discussed this evening. There were no objections. Chairman Samuel asked the audience if there were objections to any Commissioner hearing any matter. There was an objection from the audience regarding Commissioner Cruz hearing the special permit application for the location of a Community Service Facility in a C-1 Zone. ADMINISTERING THE OATH: Chairman Samuel explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or affirmation. Chairman Samuel swore in all those desiring to speak. -1 - APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Hay moved, seconded by Commissioner Little, that the minutes dated May 21, 2009 be approved as mailed. The Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: A. Preliminary Plat Casa Del Sol Div II (Fastrack, Inc.) (South of Sandifur Parkway between Road 52 and Road 44) (MF# PP09-001) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Staff explained at the last Planning Commission Hearing there was considerable discussion on the approval conditions for the proposed plat. There was a request from the Planning Commission that the Engineering Department provide a memorandum with clarification on condition (#1) related to improvements for Sandifur Parkway. The Planning Commission instructed staff to provide a condition for phased development of Sandifur Parkway. Phase 1 was to include Road 52 to Sandifur Parkway. Phase 2 would extend Sandifur Parkway to Porto Lane and Phase 3 would extend Sandifur Parkway to Road 44. The Planning Commission also asked for clarification on condition #4 related to the estate fence. Staff pointed out condition #5 was added to address question on the estate fencing. Staff also explained two sets of conditions were provided. Alternate #I contained the condition for phase development of Sandifur Parkway and Alternate # 2 contained the original condition for Sandifur Parkway from the Engineering Department. Chairman Samuel asked if the options had been reviewed with the applicant and would the applicant continue with the application if Alternate #2 was approved. Staff stated both proposals had been reviewed with the applicant as well as the applicant's engineer and real estate agent and they have stated they would not be able to move forward if the Alternate #2 was approved. They would rescind their application. Commissioner Kempf moved, seconded by Commissioner Cruz to adopt findings of fact and conclusions as contained in the June 18, 2009 staff report. Commissioner Kempf further moved, seconded by Commissioner Cruz based on the findings of fact and conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Casa Del Sol Division II with the conditions as listed in Alternate #I attached to the June 18, 2009 staff report. Motion passed unanimously. Staff explained the appeal process for the benefit of the audience. -2 - B. Preliminary Plat Chapel Hill Div II (Liberty Bankers) (Woodbine Drive) (MF# PP 09-002) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Staff stated condition #6 had been modified due to the fact the park property is on a different tax parcel than the proposed subdivision. Language was added to require an agreement between the City and the property owner detailing how the park would transfer to the City. The agreement needs to be recorded before construction drawings can be approved. The language also requires the street to be improved in front of the park. Chairman Samuel stated there was a considerable amount of public testimony regarding views being blocked by new construction and asked if the City had a view ordinance. Staff explained the City does not have a view ordinance however; there is a height limit on houses. Commissioner Hay moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller to adopt the findings of fact and conclusions as adopted in the June 18, 2009 staff report. Commissioner Hay further moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller based on the findings of fact and conclusions, as adopted, that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve a preliminary plat for Chapel Hill Division II to the Liberty Bankers with the conditions listed in the June 18, 209 staff report. Motion passed unanimously. Staff explained the appeal process for the benefit of the audience. C. BRAC Plan Wagenaar Reserve Center Base Realignment and Closure (BRAG) Redevelopment Plan (MF# INFO 08-025) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Staff stated they had no additional comments. Commissioner Cruz moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Wagenaar Reserve Center Base Realignment and Closure Plan for submittal to HUD for Balance Determination and to the Military for Property Disposal Planning. Motion passed unanimously. -3 - Staff explained this item would be present to the City Council at their July 13, 2009 workshop with final Council action to follow in August. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Special Permit Location of a Community Service Facility in a C-1 Zone (3901 W. Court Street) (Planned Parenthood) (MF# SP 09-005) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. George Fearing, 2200 W Shoshone, attorney representing Planned Parenthood asked that those person-objectioners to Mr. Cruz identify themselves and state the reasons for their objections. Chairman Samuel explained Mr. Cruz was recusing himself due to his wife's support for the application and there would be no need for anyone to identify themselves. Commissioner Cruz removed himself from the Council Chambers. Staff briefly explained the application and reviewed the proposed site information applicable to the application. The findings of fact within the staff report were highlight for the benefit of the Planning Commission. Staff explained the Planning Commission was responsible for reviewing the application based on the six criteria found in PMC 25.86. The six criteria were then read into the record. Staff also explained the purpose for the hearing was to receive testimony and that deliberations would follow at the Planning Commission meeting in August. Chairman Samuel open the hearing by explaining each presenter would be given two minutes to make comments. Cindy Aceves, Coppercap Mountain Lane was present to speak on behalf of the applicant. Ms Aceves explained there is a need for affordable and accessible basic health care in the community. After a two year search Planned Parenthood found the proposed site on Court Street. Ms. Aceves further explained some of the health needs and problems related to the costs of unwanted pregnancies in Franklin County. Commissioner Schouviller asked if there were any problems or disagreements from the public over the former Planned Parenthood faculty on 20th Avenue. Ms. Aceves stated she understood there were no problems. Commissioner Schouviller asked if there were any problems with the Kennewick facility. -4 - Ms. Aceves stated they have some protesters in Kennewick but they are quiet, peaceful and they have no problems with them. Chairman Samuel asked if there were other organizations in the community, such as La Clinic or Lourdes, that provided the same services. Ms. Aceves stated the other organization may provide some of the same services but Planned Parenthood accepts all patients regardless of ability to pay for services. Chairman Samuel asked if Planned Parenthood was planning on providing birth termination services at the proposed clinic. Ms. Aceves stated abortion services were not a needed within the Pasco community. Priscilla ??, 4621 Campolina Ln., supported the Planned Parenthood request and explained some of the services provided. Corbin Henderson, 2628 W Ruby, was concerned about the facility being next to a school. Mr. Henderson submitted a petition with signatures against the proposal. Janet Brodie, 700 N. Rd 32, stated that the services to be provided in the clinic have been explained very well. She stated that if the clinic was a doctor's office there would be no complaints. Fernando Rivas, 311 W Margaret St., stated he supported the Planned Parenthood Clinic. Dr. John Paisley, Pastor of River Baptist Church, 4805 W Wernett, stated his church is concern scripturally about abortion. He was also concerned about the counseling at the proposed clinic. Dennis Young, 4608 Walker Way, did not appreciate people not being informed about the hearing. He was also concerned that the property sold for less than the assessed value. Debbie Takata, 2006 Rd 38, was concerned about the opening in the fence between the school and the clinic. Katarina Howard, 417 N Rd 52, explained she was a Pasco High student. She is a mentor for the Planned Parenthood program to educate youth. Peggy Flick, 510 McDonald Dr, is a Christian and read a scripture from the Book of Psalms. Christine Given, 90 Jake Rd, did not want Planned Parenthood in the community for personal reasons. -5 - Kathryn Lopez, 8504 Tucker Ct, explained women should be allowed to have choices and the community should not be making decisions for women. Dr. Paul McMains, 4021 W. Opal, explained the building in question was built by the Pasco School District and because of that one could assume the Pasco School District had a connection to the proposed clinic. He did not want the Pasco School District to have a connection to the clinic. Herbert Ayers, W. Henry St., explained the Benton Franklin Health District has a responsibility to provide health education services without depending on an organization that promotes abortion. Janet Harvey, 48 Shamrock Rd, Burbank, use to be a client of Planned Parenthood and explained that a study by Planned Parenthood show that teens without sex education had the lowest teen pregnancy rate. Danielle Dubois, 805 Rd 44, was concerned about the location of the facility next to Mark Twain Elementary. Joan Toth 504, Rd 40, explained some of the topics on the Planned Parenthood web site for teens. La Clinic offers the same services that Planned Parenthood will provide. Andrew Kline, 2 Rose Ct., stated we live in a peaceful area and the threat of attacks is not an issue. He supported the clinic Gina Lemieux Jones, 3820 W. Ivy, stated the proposed clinic would bring a lifestyle change. Approval would open the door for half-way house. Mir Mar is nearby and it has the same services. James Toth, 504 N. Rd 40, had issues with criteria # 6 because the Planned Parenthood Clinic in Kennewick is subject to regular prayer vigils. Myra Angel, 7617 W. Court St, stated she supported the clinic and the data reveals there is a need for the clinic. Jennifer Kelly, 1006 Christopher Ln., could not understand why Planned Parenthood bought the property without knowing they could get approval to use the building. Aaron Worthington, 4521 W. Pearl, stated common sense would tell you not to build a Planned Parenthood at the proposed location. Robin Dillsworth, 505 N. Rd 40, explained her husband was the pastor of the Baptist Church on Rd 36. Most of their congregation is opposed to the clinic. Dick Crushman, 3505 W. Elm read a statement from Father Barnnett of Saint Patrick's Church requesting the Planning Commission deny the special permit for Planned Parenthood. -6 - Clitha Sutton, 909 N. Rd 34, was a nurse opposed to the proposal. Obdulia Sanchez, 1032 W. Margaret, has used the Planned Parenthood services and supported the proposal. Russell Johnson, 1608 Ash Way, Lynwood, from Focus on the Family spoke in opposition. Sandy Owen, 5410 W. 18th Ave, Kennewick Director of Preventative Health Services Benton Franklin Health District, explained the health needs in Franklin County and stated Planned Parenthood would address those needs. Kimberly Pennella, 8804 W. 5th, Kennewick, stated health services are needed in the community. Deanne Hoyt, 3821 W. Pearl, was opposed to the location of the clinic. Antonio Vegas, 8308 Lopez Dr, was concerned with child safety. Estrella Trevino, 2603 ??, was opposed to the proposal. Pastor Darrell Johnson, 2420 Rd 57, Faith Assembly, was opposed to the proposal. Kathryn Sistec, 4511 Saguaro Dr, was not in favor of the proposal. Alvia Valdez, 4112 W. Pearl, stated she works at Mark Twain and was opposed to the clinic. Richard Erickson, 4821 Octave, stated the Planning Commission needed to look beyond what they are legally allowed to do. He was opposed to the clinic. David Ray, 24230 Terray Way, Kennewick, Pastor of Tri-Cities Baptist Church, the church is opposed to the proposal. Iver Husa, 208 Pine Tree Ln., stated the issue was not a religious one and the Planning Commission was limited to reviewing the proposal by the criteria only. Joe Sapp, 220 Gemini Dr, felt the proposal would negatively impact the rental values of his commercial property on the south side of Court Street. Maria St Hilarie, 62006 S. Pier Rd, Kennewick, was opposed to the proposal. Carl Loera, 211 Sunny Bank Rd, was opposed to the special permit because of concerns over the disruption of harmony in the neighborhood. Laurel People, 1334 Sacramento, Richland, was present to support the proposal. Mr. Lemieux, 3404 W. Pearl St, was opposed to the proposal. -7 - Fred Nimmel, 1915 W. Hopkins, encouraged the Planning Commission to not approve the proposal. Stephanie Munoz, 5021 W. Wernett, was opposed the location by as school. Nancy Mathews, 4005 W. Park, asked the Planning Commission to vote against the proposal. Kevin Lano, 5119 Martin Ln., explained that it would not matter where the proposed clinic located, those opposed to abortion would be opposed to the clinic. Maria. Mendoza, 3002 Riverview Dr., supported the proposal. JJ Ortega, 3800 Riverhill Dr., was opposed to the proposal. Caitlyn Potten, 4817 W. Sylvester, was opposed to the proposal. Kim Hatch, 1408 Rd 59, was concerned about the location of the clinic next to Mark Twain. Melinda Ralston, 212104 E. 193th PRSC, supported approval of the clinic location. Sydney Sauceda, 807 N. Rd 34, asked the Planning Commission to deny the proposal. Victor Ortega, 3800 Riverhill Dr., was against the proposal. Jean Barrett, 4403 W Court St., from Grace Clinic stated there other options in the community to Planned Parenthood. Alisha Greenoway, 416 Rd 34, was not in favor of the proposal. Michael James Hill, 629 Meadow Springs, Richland, opposed Planned Parenthood where ever they build. Tammy La Plant, 4170 French St., Richland, was opposed to the clinic. Kimberly ??, 4170 Finnhorse Ln., was opposed to the proposal. Elaina Lorea, 211 Sunny Bank Rd, was concerned as a business owner about the impact of protesters on her adjoining business. Irs Gomez, 1408 W. 14th, Kennewick, works for Planned Parenthood and supports the proposal. Ruth Riviera, Richland, expressed support for the proposal. -8 - Joe King, 5112 Copperstown, asked the Planning Commission to approve the clinic. Mary Provard, 807 N. Rd 36, did not support the project. David Rosskelly 290 N. 56th Pl. was opposed to Planned Parenthood locating anywhere in Pasco. Joe Roach, 512 N. Rd 40, was on in favor of the proposal. Maria Allen 1104 N. Rd 40, opposed the proposal for many of the reasons expressed. Blanca ?? 4401 Finnhorse Ln., supported the special permit because it provided safe additional health care. George Fearing, 2200 W. Shoshone, stated there was a great need for Planned Parenthood and he applauded their work despite the opposition. Natalie Mendoza, 2003 Riverview Dr., made general comments about education and choices. Ramona Valley, 2014 S. Ione St Kennewick, stated it was not appropriate to locate the proposal next to Mark Twain. Suzie Murphy, 3903 S. Underwood, Kennewick, spoke against the proposal. Timothy Clark, 3415 W Sylvester St, was opposed to the proposal. Ann Shurr, 76 5th St Richland, made general statements in support of free choice. Amie Herron 5805 Boise Dr., stated Pasco needed Planned Parenthood services. Lois Degarmo, 3415 W Sylvester St., was opposed to the proposal. Jan Connolly, 135 Carmargo Ln, stated Planned Parenthood was a badly needed service in Pasco. Sean Murphy, 3903 S. Underwood, was opposed to the proposal. Phoebe Seiders, 6414 Damon Point Dr., was fully in support of Planned Parenthood in Pasco. George Nuxall, 4807 S Dayton Pl. Kennewick, was opposed to the proposal. Erica Harder, 22811 W. John Day, Kennewick was totally in support of the project. Vernon Smith 4016 W. Agate, was not in favor of the clinic. -9 - Jaclyn Firnnet, 13222 Hopp, Richland, stated the site had been well thought out and she supported the clinic. Caesar Aceves , 5713 Coppercap Ln., supported the proposal. Linda Reynolds, 806 W. 43rd Ave. Kennewick, was not in support of the proposal. Following the completion of the first round of testimonies Chairman Samuel permitted those that had spoken to make addition comments. Several individual that address the Planning Commission previously reiterated their support or opposition for the proposed clinic. Chairman Samuels closed the hearing. B. CDBG 2010 Annual Action Plan (City Wide( (MF#CDBG 09-004( Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Staff explained that the hearing was the first of two required for the development of the 2010. Notice of the hearing was published in the Tri-city Herald and the La Voz newspapers. Staff reviewed additional background information and explained the legislative proposes for the CDBG program. It was estimated the city would receive $600,000 for the 2010 program year. With prior year reallocations there would be $665,000 available for 2010. The City received 16 proposals from various organizations for use of the 2010 funds. The proposals requested approximately 1.4 million in funding, about $720,000 less than available funding. Commissioner Little asked about the funding that reviewed earlier in the year. Staff explained that the earlier hearings were for additional funding that amended the 2008 program. The 2010 funding proposals were presented as follows: Item 1: Program Administration ($120,000) Angie Pitman, CDBG Coordinator, reported that this funding would offset the cost of administering the CDBG and pays the salary and benefits for the Block Grant Administrator and a portion of the salary and benefits for the Secretary. The remainder is used for other necessary expenses for administering the program. -10 - Item 2: Civic Center Recreation Specialist ($37,500) Item 3: Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist ($37,500) Item 4: Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist ($37,500) Stan Strebel, Administrative and Community Services Director explained his department was again requesting partial funding for recreation specialists at three of the City recreation facilities. The programs offered at the facilities range from after school programs for at risk youth to health care and nutrition programs for the elderly. Chairman Samuel asked if the request was similar to last years. Mr. Strebel stated very much so. Ms. Pitman added that public services are limited to 15% of the total entitlement plus prior year program income. Usually, these public service activities are reduced proportionately to meet that 15% cap. Item 5: Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen ($65,000) Victoria Silvernail, Manager of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen presented a request for $65,000 to operate the Pasco Specialty Kitchen which provides services to 35 small businesses. Ms. Silvernail explained how the Kitchen works with Columbia Basin College and the Columbia Basin Business Center to assist clients in developing business plans. Chairman Samuel asked if the Kitchen was more reliant on the CDBG funds than it has been in the past. Ms. Silvernail explained they receive funding from the City, Pasco School District and user's fees. Chairman Samuel asked how many years the Kitchen had been receiving city funding. Ms. Silvernail stated, to her knowledge, since 2003. Commissioner Cruz asked what percent of the total funding comes from the CDBG program. Ms. Silvernail explained the Kitchen requested $65,000. It receives $10,000 from the School District, generates approximately $40,000. Commissioner Cruz asked if this was better than in the past, is there a trend showing improvement. Ms. Silvernail stated yes, there is a very good improvement. -11 - Item 6: Downtown Facade Improvement (4 facades) ($80,000) Gloria Garcia, Interim Director for PDDA, noted the PDDA is working with some downtown business owners to promote the facade program. The Association hopes to complete 8 fagade projects underway by November. Chairman Samuel asked what the matching funds were. Ms. Garcia, stated the loan is capped at $20,000. A deposit of $500 for good faith is received by the business. The split is 75% CDBG, and 25% owner, which is forgiven over 7 years. Chairman Samuel asked how many facades have been completed to date. Ms. Garcia answered two, Mi Hacienda and Mexi-Muebles. Item 7: Energy Efficient Home Program (8 households) ($20,000) David Odom, Benton-Franklin CAC, has been doing operating this program for many years. They are requesting $20,000 that will be matched with funds from the State energy "Matchmaker" program. They hope to complete 8 maybe 10 homes this year inside the city limits. The program is designed to protect the families, make homes energy efficient, and deal with mold. Vice Chairman Samuel asked if they planned on doing 10 houses this year. Mr. Odom stated 8 houses. Vice Chairman Samuel asked if it was for 8 last year also and if there would be a problem meeting that amount. Mr. Odom responded that they actually ended up with a lot more energy assistance this year, for about 600 homes in Benton and Franklin Counties. Commissioner Cruz asked how many homes were done over the last 5 years. Mr. Odom stated 600 in Benton and Franklin County, at least 300 were here. Item 9: Habitat for Humanity Brush With Kindness ($24,000) Theresa Richardson, Executive Director for Habitat for Humanity presented the Brush With Kindness project. It is an opportunity to improve affordable housing and revitalize neighborhoods and an extension of what Habitat does nation- wide. The project would provide exterior home repair and painting along with minor landscaping, and serve elderly, disabled and low-income families who have challenges maintaining their homes. This project is seeking seed money to serve 8 households in Census Tract 202. Habitat for Humanity develops -12 - community engagement very well. This project hopes to engage kids in the neighborhood to give them some skills during the summer and pride in their neighborhood. Valspar Paints donates all the paint. Other community partners provide incentive gifts to the kids for coming out. They hope that this will be the last time to seek funding. The goal is to engage the corporate community to take this project on a larger scale. Projects are designed to be 1-3 days long as opposed to 3 months. Chairman Samuel asked if there was a minimum dollar amount where this project would not be able to move forward. Ms. Richardson, stated the request is for $24,000 for costs of materials and administration to get the project moving with 8 projects, but they would be happy with whatever they could get. They hope to partner with other City projects maximizing funding available for interior repairs, by providing the "icing on the cake". Chairman Samuel asked if half the money would only do half the projects. Ms. Richardson answered possibly. They are just launching this program so it could possibly work out that way. Item 10: Elijah Family Homes - Continue to Step-up ($182,OOO) Barbara Puigh, President of Elijah Family Homes and CPA for LeMaster-Daniels present the proposal for Elijah Family Homes. Elijah Family Homes provides rental subsidies for special needs families. They are requesting $182,000 to purchase a 3-bedroom duplex to provide affordable housing for very low income families with barriers to obtaining housing assistance. Elijah Family Homes concentrates on families because positive families impact every part of the community. This impact shows in positive changes in the schools, Health District, Headstart, Police and the Courts. To qualify the family must have children under the age of 18, and income levels at or below 50% of the median income. Most have been lower, and they must have been turned by Public Housing. Families average 3 or more children. This will provide housing for families for a number of years. Chairman Samuel asked how many years have you been operating? Ms. Puigh answered since May of 2005, originally as a ministry of Christ the King. They became a 501(c)(3) in 2007. Chairman Samuel asked how many families have been helped in that time. Ms. Puigh answered 16 families, some have been with them two years or more, some have moved on in positive ways, some have not. The relapse rate for Meth is 70%, Elijah Family Homes has had a 70% success rate. Chairman Samuel asked if they had half the amount would they do half the project? Ms. Puigh answered that it would be hard to put a family out there by themselves if they've only been clean a year or so. -13 - Chairman Samuel asked if$90,000 would be problematic. Ms. Puigh answered that it would be, but our Board might say "yes". It is really important to own 4 units or more to qualify for Washington Families fund which gives case management for 10 years. Putting a roof over a head is not enough, they can't successfully move forward without it. Item 11: Jericho Road Ministries Havensafe (15 bed spaces for DV) ($288,000) Amy Schultz, Director of Jericho Road Ministries, which is a crisis ministry that helps people in need in the local Tri-Cities area and in the smaller surrounding communities. They have been working in partnership with City of Pasco DVRU and helping domestic violence victims. They are pursuing a way to establish a safehouse in West Pasco to increase 15 bed spaces in the community as a resource for families experiencing domestic violence. Kim Kelch, Domestic Violence Services Coordinator for Pasco Police Department, her primary function is to address domestic violence issues in our community. This partnership came together because of a need for victims of family violence in the community. The City has a need shown by Council goals developed to address this issue. As of last year, the first full calendar year of tracking calls, there were 1,137 calls received, 555 arrests, and 401 households where children were present at the time violence was happening. Chairman Samuel asked if this was in Pasco. Ms. Kelch replied this was just within the city limits of Pasco. This proposal is to provide an option within our community. The regional domestic violence shelter is not in Pasco and it places a hardship on victims in Pasco who must leave their community and support system. The issue being addressed is the "intimate partner" barrier. The language the current shelter operates under limits assistance "intimate partner" domestic violence. According to the Washington State laws, family violence includes teenaged children assaulting their parents, adult children assaulting their elderly parents, and roommates assaulting each other, e.g. 17-year old mother who is assaulted by her father and threatened with death. There were no resources available for her, law enforcement spent over two hours trying to facilitate a placement for her. Chairman Samuel asked where the shelter was located. Ms. Kelch replied that it was in a confidential location. She, as an advocate, is able to transport victims directly to the shelter, but law enforcement is not permitted to transport there. Staying in this community means that the victim maintains access to their transportation, schools, stores, etc. The idea is to provide temporary transitional housing, the ideal goal is for a weekend or few days stay until the locks can be changed and protection orders placed, so the victim and children can remain in their household. The partnership between the faith-based organization and the DVRU provides a winning combination for the care and safety of domestic violence victims. -14 - Chairman Samuel asked if they received half the money if they would be able to serve half population. Ms. Kelch stated that in this case the answer would be "no". They would have to continue to do fundraising to finish it because the facility must to be a certain size, and laid out a certain way to facilitate the programs needed and provide the space to ensure the safety of clientele housed. It would slow the progress down. Chairman Samuel asked if not getting funds would stop the program. Ms. Kelch answered, "No, it would significantly slow it down." Chairman Samuel asked if it were possible to show impact with a reduced allocation to $30,000 or $40,000. Ms. Kelch answered that it would be the first step toward identifying a property. Part of the reason of looking at a new structure is the opportunity to have security systems hardwired in. This is intended to be a partnership and resource within the community. Chairman Samuel asked if they received $30,000 if they could come back next year and show tangible what the funding was used for and its impact. Ms. Kelch answered, "Absolutely." Item 8: Community Housing Improvement Program - Minor Household Repair (10 homes) ($20,000) Mr. Angie Pitman, Block Grant Administrator, presented the request for $20,000 for minor household repair to fill a gap covered existing housing rehabilitation and repair projects. Stating that this would provide funding for projects that may be not be served by volunteer organizations and may require hiring a contractor to complete. Item 13: Boys & Girls Club - Exterior Lighting & Security System ($55,000) Mr. Ron McHenry, Boys 8v Girls Club Vice President of Finance, presented the proposal for safety enhancements at the facility. Currently there are two 60-watt light bulbs at the entrance and trees fronting the building that block out natural light. The walk from the parking lot to the building, especially in winter becomes treacherous. The side facing Edgar Brown Stadium has no lighting, so during the summer months there is a lot of graffiti because there isn't any way to see what is going on. This is a little bit of lighting on the south and north sides and don't get any graffiti there. This request is not for replacing fixtures that are broken and old, but the building was not built for lighting in these areas. In addition to this, they are requesting a security system be retrofitted to provide for improve communications. There have been SWAT teams with assault rifles drawn within eyesight in twice in the last year. Program staff carries "walkies" but in a cement building the message doesn't get through when you are trying to get 180 kids who are noisy into classrooms and away from windows. The requested funding would provide an integrated system that provides monitors in each room, it would be able to put the whole building in lock-down visually. -Is - Item 12: Boys Sv Girls Club - Tween Center Design ($17,500) Mr. Ron McHenry, Boys & Girls Club Vice President of Finance, presented the proposal for architectural design for a Tween Center. Currently, the facility serves kids preschool through 5th grade. They also have a Teen Center in the Navy Homes area that serves kids in grades 61h through 12th. Most parents will not allow their middle-school kids to go to the Teen Center. As a result there are good kids with nothing to do that end up being the cause for most of the graffiti. The plan is to design a 3,000 square foot outbuilding directly north of the gymnasium, out of the line of sight, and specifically designed for 6th through 8th graders. The current campus already has a gym and a kitchen and 80 more kids can be easily served at this location because they don't need to put in a lot of plumbing or a gym. The building would provide a learning space of their own with age appropriate activities. The security system requested above would provide a means to communicate between the two buildings. The design will be split into three areas to maintain light of sight requirements. Another feature they hope to add is a dental facility. A sister club in King County recently did this. We would be able to provide free dental exams to all the kids. Requesting the funding in phases allows the Club to go after additional grants and funding to defray the costs. The Boys 8s Girls Club will provide $15,000 to $20,000 to outfit the building in addition to increasing their operating costs by $60,000 to about $90,000 per year. He closed with an illustration of the impact the staff has had on one of the new kids at the facility. Commissioner Little asked if they considered partnering with CBC's dental program. Mr. McHenry responded they are working on that. Item 14: Administrative 8v Community Services - Lucas Park Playground Renovation ($60,000) Mr. Stan Strebel presented a proposal for replacement of the last piece of noncompliant play equipment in a city park. Lucas Park is in a neighborhood of approximately 60% low to moderate income population. This request would allow them to replace the equipment and the fall-zone under the equipment and provide accessibility. Chairman Samuel asked if total funding were not provided what would happen. Mr. Strebel replied that they would wait another year or until funding were again available. Item 15: Code Enforcement Officer ($48,000) Mr. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director reported that this request is to pay partial salary expenses for code enforcement officers operating in Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204. The goal is to prevent property nuisances, community-wide blight and fire hazards in those areas as well as providing an educational component. Chairman Samuel asked if this was a change from last year. -16 - Mr. White replied that it is not. Item 16: Kurtzman Park Phase II ($300,000) Mr. Rick White presented the application for the engineering division for a bricks and mortar project in the Kurtzman neighborhood. It is the result of a planning process that began in 2007 and has progressed to the point where parameters are being outlined for a Local Improvement District in that area using funds that have been committed through various sources since year 2000. It will provide curb, gutter, sidewalks, streetlights and in some cases utility improvements in the Kurtzman Park neighborhood area, Census Tract 201. Chairman Samuel asked that even with the growth of Pasco we continue to get around $600,000-$700,000. Is there any way to get more funding. Ms. Pitman replied that the allocation is determined by what is budgeted by Congress and the formula. Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing. Dave Cortinas, residing at 1807 W Yakima, owner and publisher of La Voz Hispanic newspaper located at 710 N 4th Avenue. When he saw the advertisement in his newspaper regarding allocation of the 2010 CDBG funds, he wanted to speak. In hearing the presentations he noted that there are many success stories. With success stories, come good administrators who operate those funds. He is asking that no more funds be given to the Pasco Downtown Development Association and discussed his reasoning why. He suggested the funding be given to an organization with administration to carry it out. He stated that he hoped in the future to be an applicant for the funding. Chairman Samuel asked if his position were that the PDDA is beyond repair? Mr. Cortinas responded that he served on the board for one year and felt that his time and efforts would be better spent elsewhere. He thought their heart is in the right place, but the administration, leadership, and knowledgeable business is not there. Mr. McHenry thanked the Planning Commission for their service to the community being here for five hours tonight. After three calls the public hearing was closed. Chairman Samuel asked if there were any further comments from staff. There being none. Commissioner Cruz requested a copy of the spreadsheet be emailed to the commission for their recommendations. WORKSHOP: The following two items were on the on the June 18, 2009 meeting agenda but were not discussed due to the length of the meeting. A. Code Amendment PMC 25.58 I-182 Corridor Overlay District (City of Pasco)( MF# CA09-001) -17 - B. Sub-Area Plan Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan (West of Broadmoor Blvd north of Harris Road) (City of Pasco OTHER BUSINESS: With no further business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 11:46 pm. David McDonald, Secretary -18 - REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 09-005 APPLICANT: Planned Parenthood of Central Washington HEARING DATE: 6/18/2009 1117 Tieton Drive ACTION DATE: 7/16/2009 Yakima, WA 98902 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of Community Service Facility Level One 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Mark Twain Addition Lot 3 General Location: 3901 West Court Street Property Size: 39,107 square feet (0.9 acres) 2. ACCESS: The site is accessible from Court Street. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site from Court Street. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned C-1 (Retail Business) and contains a 4,692 square foot unoccupied structure. The property to the north is developed with Mark Twain Elementary School and is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). Properties to the east and west are zoned C-1 and developed with a bank and multi-tenant office buildings. Properties to the south are also zoned C-1. The Pasco Unified School District resource center occupies two parcels to the south and a car-wash is located to the southeast. S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Commercial uses. The plan does not specifically address health clinics, but various elements of the plan encourage locating businesses in appropriate locations for their anticipated uses. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. ANALYSIS The applicant is proposing to locate a Community Service Facility at 3901 West Court Street. The proposed facility will provide women's health care through medical exams, cancer screening, reproductive health screenings, other medical related services and a variety of educational programs. The 4,692 square foot building will contain three exam rooms, four administrative offices, a kitchen, a waiting area, a small laboratory and five restrooms. Initial hours of operation will be from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. The site is located on West Court Street 3,000 feet west of SR-395, which is a State Highway. Court Street is an arterial street. Both Court Street and SR- 395 are able to accommodate high traffic volumes and would easily serve the additional 70 vehicle trips per day estimated to be generated by the facility. Court Street is fully developed in this area and would require no additional infrastructure improvements. The site provides 38 off-street parking spaces in two parking lots to the north and south of the facility. The Pasco Municipal Code requires a minimum of 16 spaces to accommodate the clinic. Therefore, the applicant will exceed the minimum parking requirement by twenty two (22) spaces. Non-profit community clinics are defined as Community Service Facilities (Level One) and as such are required to obtain a special permit before locating anywhere within the city. The La Clinica facility at Court Street and 5th Avenue and the Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic (Mir Mar) on Road 44 are examples of other non-profit clinics that were reviewed in the past through the Special Permit process. These types of clinics, as well as other medical offices are located in "O" (Office) or "C-1" (Retail Business) zoning districts. One of the areas of concern often expressed when special permit uses are reviewed is their potential impact on property values. According to Benton County Assessor records, property values have increased over the past six (6) years for those properties surrounding the Planned Parenthood facility at 7426 W. Bonnie Avenue in Kennewick. STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is located within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Commercial uses. 3. The site is zoned C-1 (Retail Business). 2 4. Non-profit health centers are defined by the zoning regulations (PMC 25.12.155) as Community Service Facilities (Level One) which require review by the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zone. 5. Other non-profit community health clinics in the community are located in "C-1" (La Clinica) or "O" (Yakima Valley Farm Workers Health Clinic) zones. 6. For-profit medical offices & clinics are permitted uses in C-1 zones. 7. The site proposed for the medical clinic is currently unoccupied. 8. The proposed medical clinic could generate approximately 30-60 vehicle trips per day (including employees). 9. The clinic will have up to 10 staff members. 10. The applicant anticipates the facility will provide services for approximately 19-25 clients per day. 11. The site contains enough area for thirty eight (38) on-site parking stalls. 12. Business hours for restaurants, taverns, membership clubs and retail stores which are permitted in the C-1 zoning district often extend to 9:00 PM or later. 13. PMC 28.86.060 Requires the Planning Commission to make and enter findings and conclusions from the record as to whether or not: 1) The proposal is in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives, maps and/or narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; 2) The proposal will adversely affect public infrastructure; 3) The proposal will be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity; 4) The location and height of proposed structures and the site design will discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof, 5) The operations in connection with the proposal will be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district; and 6) The proposal will endanger the public health, or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district. 14. There was considerable testimony for and against approval of the Special Permit at the June 181h 2009 open record hearing. In addition, the Planning Commission received a large amount of written testimony. 3 Testimony was not focused on the six (6) criteria contained in PMC 25.86.060. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The site is identified in the Comprehensive Plan for commercial uses. The proposed medical clinic is a office use typically found in commercial ares.. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development of a wide range of commercial uses located to support local and regional needs. The proposed use is located near other related medical facilities at Road 40 and Court Street and Road 44 and Court Street. The facility will be strategically located on a major arterial about half a mile from a regional highway. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? All municipal utilities are currently available to the proposed site from surrounding streets. The daily client base and number of employees at the facility will not generate a greater demand on infrastructure than past uses on the site or than uses permitted in the C-1 zoning district. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The office building being considered in this application has existed on the site for over 40 years. It will continued to be maintained as an office building with operating hours similar to those of surrounding offices. The proposed use will be less intense than other permitted uses within the C-1 District such as restaurants, night clubs and certain types of stores. A medical clinic/office will be operated and maintained in harmony with the intended character of the general vicinity. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereofd The clinic is proposing minor fagade improvements which will not alter the size or height of the building. The existing facility was originally constructed in 1962. The existing commercial zoning and development has not impaired the value of adjoining properties. A search of property tax records for properties 4 adjacent to the Planned Parenthood facility in Kennewick revealed that values have increased over the past several years. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Health clinics are generally less intense land uses than general retail uses. This use will not generate vibrations, noise or fumes that often accompany permitted uses such as car washes, shops, restaurants and taverns. A medical clinic/office may be less disruptive to the adjacent residences than other permitted uses due to the fact the clinic will be closed on weekends and during evening hours when people tend to be home. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Health clinics and medical offices are typically located within commercial zoning districts and have not been found to create health or safety concerns for neighboring businesses. The Planned Parenthood facility that was located on 20th Avenue several years ago was not a nuisance to other nearby uses on 20th Avenue. Other uses permitted in the C-1 zone such as car-washes, taverns, nightclubs and restaurants are more likely to be disruptive than the proposed clinic. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions there from as contained in the July 16, 2009 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of fact and conclusions there from the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Planned Parenthood for the location of a Level-One Community Service Facility with the following conditions: APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; 5 2) The clinic shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan submitted with the application; 3) The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit has not been obtained by February 3, 2010. 6 • Item: Community Service Facility Vicinity Applicant: Planned Parenthood N Map 09-005 File #. SP At W AGATE #014 SITE WAGATE ST LL _ t r - . W�RU BY ST. CO RUBY ST •r- r r F COURT ST 4' CO l Q fr►f F rrr� ' ,f _ ,nf T - .•� - - PAL r AL w Community Service Facility Land Item: Community Service Facility Use Applicant: Planned Parenthood N Map File #: SP 09-005 7 7-- � � I W AGATE ST School N QSITE W AGATE ST ry SFDU's � SFDU's W RUBY ST CO W RUBY ST w 3 COURT ST CO o Commercial Q 1 -%.Church o C) BROWN-ST- Vac. SFDU's S F D U 'S Zoning Item: Community Service Facility Applicant: Planned Parenthood N Map File #: SP 09-005 W AGATE ST R- 1 N QRS= 12 SITE W AGATE ST O -j� a W RUBY ST � R- � I Li R� 1 M W RUBY ST IW011 M COURT ST p � CO CO ° C1 Q a - o C- 1 RS= 12 BROWN-ST RS- 12 EC � ems, rt' • • • 'diff • • \ Planned Parenthood -Pasco Clinic Project Application Package City of Paco Planned Parenthoc�dJ of Central Washington -------- ------ -- --------------------------� LIT- IL i i i ------------------------ Existing As built Layout Planned Parenthood -Pasco Clinic Project Application Package City of Paco ------ -------------------------- ----------------------------i i Elec Unassigned Tech ;`RR � O Community Room Kitchen O _ i i RR\ Unassigned _ Exam Exam Office ------- Exam;/ i ❑ --- O Ed ❑ +�9 ',Lab 1 Open Office Area i -- ' RR ` Office , keceptidn ` ' E) 1:1 D ❑ D ❑ D Office Jan. D ❑ D Office -" .'"� Entry Cl Waiting RR ; RR ; Kid 00000 -------------------' Concept Layout Planned Parenthood -Pasco Clinic Project Application Package City of Paco MEMORANDUM DATE: June 10, 2009 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator SUBJECT: 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ALLOCATION Requests for Funding Attached for your review and consideration are the CDBG Fund and Proposal Summaries (Attachments 1 & 2)relating to our Community Development Block Grant Program for 2010. Sixteen(16) requests for funds were submitted totaling $1,392,000. Each applicant will present their proposal before the Planning Commission tonight, June 18, 2009. Estimated Funds Available It is estimated that the 2010 annual entitlement grant will be $600,000 with no program income. Funds available for reallocation are $65,000, making a total of$665,000 in funds available for use in 2010. There is always some question regarding actual funding levels approved by Congress. Actual available funding for these FY 2010 activities will remain in question until the early part of 2010 when the allocation is made. If funding levels are lower than estimated, activity funding may need to be reallocated accordingly. Public Service Can HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support public service activities may not exceed 15% of the combined total of the entitlement plus the prior year's program income. For 2010, the estimated entitlement of$600,000, and 2009 program income of$2,000 makes the maximum available for public service activities $90,300. Current requests for public services total $112,500. Staff recommends a maximum of$80,000 for public services(13%). Planning& Administration Can HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support planning and administration activities may not exceed 20%of the combined total of the entitlement plus the current year's program income. For 2010,the estimated entitlement of $600,000 makes the maximum available for planning and administration$120,000. Current requests for planning and administration total $120,000. Staff recommends a maximum of $120,000 for planning and administration(20%). Recommendation At the July 16, 2009 public hearing, staff will provide an evaluation and recommendation for a proposed work plan that will best meet the City's Consolidated Plan goals and be most effective in carrying out the objectives for the City in 2010. /arp Attachments: 1. 2010 CDBG Fund Summary 2. 2010 CDBG Proposal Summary Attachment 1 2010 CDBG Fund Summary = June 18, 2009 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 Proposals-Recommendations ID Recipients ACTIVITY / AGENCY NonCDBGMatch Agency Staff PC NAME Requested Recommend Recommend City of Pasco-Community CDBG Program 1 1 & Economic Development Administration $0.00 $120,000.00 $0.00 $0. 00 City of Pasco- Administrative & Civic Center -Youth $459500.00 $37,500.00 $0.00 2 Community Services Recreation Specialist $0.00 City of Pasco- Martin Luther King Administrative & Community Center $100,500.00 $37,500.00 $0.00 3 Community Services Recreation Specialist $0.00 City of Pasco- Administrative & Senior Citizen's Center $200,000.00 $37,500.00 $0.00 4 Community Services Recreation Specialist $0.00 Pasco Downtown Pasco Downtown Development Association- Development Commercial $409420.00 $65,000.00 $0.00 5 SK Kitchen $0.00 Pasco Downtown Development Association- Downtown Facade $20,000.00 $80,000. 00 $0. 00 6 PDDA Improvement (4 facades) $0.00 Benton Franklin CAC - Energy Efficient Home $207000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 7 Home Energy Program ( 10 households) $0.00 City of Pasco-Community CHIP Minor Rehab $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 8 & Economic Development Program (4 households) $0.00 Tri-County Partners, Brush With Kindness (8 $24, 000.00 $24,000.00 $0.00 9 Habitat for Humanity Households) $0.00 Continuing to Step Up (2 $30,000.00 $182 ,000.00 $0.00 10 Elijah Family House Households) $0. 00 $72,000.00 $288,000.00 $0. 00 11 Jerico Roads Ministries Havensafe (8 Households) $0.00 Boys & Girls Club of Benton & Franklin Boys & Girls Center $9,300.00 $17,500.00 $0.00 12 Counties Tween Center Design $0.00 Boys & Girls Club of Boys & Girls Club External Benton & Franklin lighting & security system $17,463.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 13 Counties camera and monitor $0.00 City of Pasco- Administrative & Lucas Park Playground $0.00 $60,000.00 $0.00 14 Community Services Equipment $0.00 City of Pasco-Inspection $177025.00 $48,000.00 $0.00 15 iServices Code Enforcement Officer $0.00 Neighborhood City of Pasco-Public Improvements - Phase II $0.00 $300,000.00 $0.00 16 Works (CT201 BG4) $0. 00 $616,208.00 $1 ,392,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Entitlement (Estimated) $ 6009000 Program Income (Estimated) $ - Prior Year Reallocations $ 659000 Total Funds Available $ 6659000 Proposals Recommended $ - SURPLUS/DEFICIT $ 6659000 6/11 /2009 Attachment 1 2010 CDBG Fund Summary - June 18, 2009 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 Reallocate-Carryover RECIPIENT ACTIVITY PY HUD ID BALANCE CARRY OVER REALLOCATE City of Pasco-Administrative MARTIN LUTHER KING &Community Services CENTER RENOVATION 2007 243 $32,445.80 $32,445.80 City of Pasco-Community& PROGRAM Economic Development ADMINISTRATION 2008 245 $6,962.90 $6,962.90 CIVIC CENTER City of Pasco-Administrative RECREATION &Community Services SPECIALIST 2008 246 $0.00 MARTIN LUTHER KING City of Pasco-Administrative RECREATION &Community Services SPECIALIST 2008 247 1 $0.00 City of Pasco-Administrative SENIOR CITIZEN'S & Community Services CENTER 2008 248 $0.00 Pasco Downtown Development Association- PDDA COMMERCIAL SK KITCHEN 2008 249 1 $0.00 Pasco Downtown Development Association- DOWNTOWN FACADE PDDA IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 2008 250 $84,939.00 $84,939.00 CATHOLIC FAMILY& Catholic Family&Child CHILD SVCS-VOL. Services-Pasco CHORE 2008 251 1 $6,934.06 $6,934.06 BENTON FRANKLIN CAC- Benton Franklin CAC- HOME ENERGY Home Energy PROGRAM 2008 252 $0.00 City of Pasco-Community& Economic Development CODE ENFORCEMENT 2008 253 1 $0.00 BOYS&GIRLS CLUB Boys& Girls Club of Benton CAPITAL & Franklin Counties IMPROVEMENTS 2008 254 $0.00 MARTIN LUTHER KING City of Pasco-Administrative CENTER STORM &Community Services DRAINAGE 2008 1 255 $16,836.40 $16,836.40 City of Pasco-Administrative PEANUTS PARK &Community Services RESTROOM UPGRADE 2008 256 $64,658.50 $64,658.50 City of Pasco-Administrative VOLUNTEER PARK ADA &Community Services TRAIL PICNIC PAVILION 2008 1 257 $33,814.13 $33,814.13 City of Pasco-Community& Economic Development CHIP MINOR REHAB 2008 258 $37,500.00 $37,500.00 LID ASSISTANCE ULID City of Pasco-Public Works #143 2008 259 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 KURTZMAN PARK NEIGHBORHOOD City of Pasco-Public Works IMPROVEMENT 2008 260 $40,000.00 $5,000.00 $35,000.00 $374,090.79 $308,357.43 $65,733.36 6/11/2009 Attachment 1 2010 CDBG Fund Summary - June 18 , 2009 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 Public Service Cap ID ACTIVITY ACTIVITY / AGENCY NonCDBGMatch Agency Staff PC NAME Requested Recommend Recommend City of Pasco- Administrative & Civic Center -Youth $457500.00 $37 ,500. 00 $0.00 2 Community Services Recreation Specialist $0 .00 City of Pasco- Martin Luther King Administrative & Community Center $ 100, 500.00 $37 ,500.00 $0.00 3 Community Services Recreation Specialist $0.00 City of Pasco- Administrative & Senior Citizen's Center $200,000.00 $379500.00 $0.00 4 Community Services Recreation Specialist $0. 00 $346,000.00 $ 112 , 500.00 $0.00 $0.00 Entitlement ( Estimated ) $ 6009000 Prior Year Program Income $ 2 ,000 Total Funds Subject to Public Services Cap $ 6021000 Public Services Cap ( Maximum) 15% $ 90,300 Public Services Recommended 0% $ 6/ 11 /2009 Attachment 2 CITY OF PASCO 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY 1 CDBG Program Administration — Requested : $ 120,000 CDBG funds are used to plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. 2 Civic Center -Youth Recreation Specialist — Requested : $37,500 CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Youth Civic Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for youth at risk and families in low-to-moderate income Census Tract (202) . 3 Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist — Requested : $37,500 CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Martin Luther King. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to at risk school age , youth, and families in Census Tract (201 ) . 4 Senior Citizen' s Center Recreation Specialist — Requested : $37,500 CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly of Pasco with support services, nutrition, health and living skills support. 5 Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen — Requested : $65,000 CDBG funds are used to continue operations of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, a certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical support to small food-related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance, the startup businesses agree to make jobs created available to low-to-moderate income persons in Pasco (Census Tract 202) . 6 Downtown Facade Improvement (4 facades) — Requested : $80,000 CDBG funds are used to support business to continue downtown fagade improvements, four new projects are anticipated for this program year (Census Tract 202). 1 Attachment 2 CITY OF PASCO 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY 7 Energy Efficient Home Program (10 households) — Requested : $20,000 CDBG funds are used to provide 10 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards improvements (City-wide) . 8 CHIP Minor Rehab Program (4 households) — Requested: $20,000 CDBG funds are used to provide 4 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards improvements (Census Tract 202). 9 Brush With Kindness (8 Households) — Requested : $24,000 CDBG funds are used to provide staff coordination and materials for minor exterior household repair projects or 8 low/very low income families in the Museum and Longfellow neighborhoods (Census Tract 202) . 10 Continuing to Step Up — Requested: $ 182,000 CDBG funds are used for acquisition/rehabilitiation of a three-bedroom duplex in Pasco for the purpose of providing affordable housing for 2 low/very low income families with small children who are otherwise unable to attain suitable housing. 11 Havensafe — Requested : $288,000 CDBG funds are used for acquisition/rehabilitation for suitable housing to provide 15 additional bed spaces for persons experiencing domestic violence in Pasco . 12 Boys & Girls Club Tween Center Design — Requested : $ 17,500 CDBG funds are used for design and technology for security enhancements in advance of of facility expansion. Exterior lighting to illuminate the front and west facing side of the bulding to ensure safe circumstances for youth and parents traveling to and from the Club an on the North and East sides where no light is currently present. 13 Boys & Girls Club External lighting & Safety/Security Enhancements — Requested : $55,000 CDBG funds are used to engage architect for facility expansion project for Tween's Center. Middle school students are underserved by current youth services programs. These youth are most usceptible to negative influences from peers. A new 2 , 500-3 ,000 2 Attachment 2 CITY OF PASCO 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY square foot facility would provide them a "place of their own" . Currently there are 49 members who will be ineligible to attend the Main Branch in 2009-2010 . On average 40 youth " age-out" of the Main Branch facility annually. In 2008-2009 only 3 transitioned to Boys & Girls Club programs at the Teen Center where the participants are much older. With Construction of a new Tween Center, it is anticipated 80% of participants from the Main Branch program would be retained. Over three years it is estimated that the population would grow to 80 youth per day. By having a separate facility where more age-appropriate activities can take place and staff who are able to focus on the special needs of an adolescent population transitioning into their teen years, the youth in the community who need the most help will be more effectively served. 14 Lucas Park Playaround Equipment — Requested : $60,000 CDBG funds are used to replace playground equipment in Lucas Park which is outdated. This project will serve the local neighborhood that is low-moderate income families. 15 Code Enforcement Officer — Requested: $48,000 CDBG funds are used to provide for a code enforcement officer to help improve neighborhood appearance and for compliance with rules and regulations dealing with homeowner needs in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts 2019 202 , 203 and 204) . 16 Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Improvements - Phase II (CT201BG4) - Requested : $300,000 CDBG funds are used to provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and roadway improvements in low-income neighborhood (Census Tract 201 ) . 3 Zfo f affnd 6002 `!I aunf '&'vpsJnqI (sploilasnOH 00"000'4Z$ 00 ,000 '4Z$ 9 JNisnOH Al!I!gepiolIV HO HWl ZOZ'OL9 Vi? 9) sseupuiN 4l!M gsnag 60 (splogesnoq y) 00"000'OZ$ 00 '000 'OZ$ 4 JNisnOH Al!I!gepio.4V HO HW1 ZOZ'OL9 V17 weJ6ad geyay Jouilry dIHO 90 (splogasnoq OL ) weJ6oJd 00'000'OZ$ 00 '000'OZ$ OL JNisnOH Al!I!gepiolIV HO HINT ZOZ'OL9 V17 awOH luOlOW3 A6a9u3 LO spunj ogaj-uoA[ palsanbag ifJua,8V #laauvzujofiad azuoalno aellaafgolvAl uollvlIJIN WOM XIIA113V 41Apad 00 '0006997$ 00 000 `>d£Ss slvlolgnS 2ulsnog luaaaa 6000 (sape3el q) luawanoidwl OT000'0Z$ 00'000'09$ b O3 43!I!geu!elsnS 03 VINI ZOZ'OL9 3K ope6ed unnoluMOO 90 uay0IN le!oaawwoo luawdolanaO OTOZ4'0b$ 00 '000'99$ 9£ (13 Al!I!q!ss000y/Al!I!gel!eAy 03 fall )(0) LOZ'OL9 89L uMOluMOO nosed 90 spunj ogaa-uoA[ palsanbag d3ua,fd #laauvrurofjad amoaino aallaafQplyAr u011v1D/XIJID l 41A!13V 414113V 00 'OZ6`09$ 008000ws slvlolgnS sagluniioddo ouuouoad £000 ls!le!oedS uo!leajoo�j 000000'OOZ$ 00 ,009 'L£$ 009L Sd A3!I!q!ssaooV/A3!I!gel1eA`d 31S ON-1 (a) LOZ'OL9 V90 Jolueos,uaz!;!OJo!ues 40 ls!le!oadS uo!leajoaa �ejuaO �(l!unwwoO 00, 009'003 000009'L£$ 9099 Sd 43!I!q!ssaooy/Al!I!gel!eny 31S yW1 (940ZOOL9 90 6u!>{ jaglnl u!ljeW £0 ls!le!oadS uo!leaaoab 00'009'94$ 00 '009'L£$ 01799 Sd Al!I!q!ssaooy/Ai!I!gel!eny 31S yW1 (a) LOZ'OL9 90 glnoA- Ja;uaO O!A!O ZO spunj ogQO-uom palsanbag d3uaod #laauvuraofrad azuoalno anllaafgolyAl uollylDINMIDAT dllnllaV dilAllad 00000019PP£$' 00 00glaZ$ slviolgnS sa3lwaS allgnd 2000 uo!leils!u! wpy 00'0$ 00 '000,ms L NIWO`d Al!Uq!sseooy/Al!I!gel!eAV 31S ViNl 90Z'OL9 VLZ weJ6ad JBOO LO spunj ogaj-uoA[ palsanbagd3uaffV #/aauvturofrad amoaino anliaafgolvll uollyllo/xlalvylt dllallaV dI1At13d 00 '05 000000 `0ZIS slviolgnS uoilvlislumpV13dfold 1000 sailzAI13V V slaafo id pasodoij O IOZ ZfoZaond 6002 'll aunf 'dnpsanyI 0008OZ69I99 000000 `Z6£IS 07viol (bJ8 LOZlO) II aseyd - sluawanadwl poogjogq61gN 0000$ 00 '000'00£$ 0009 dd Al!l!q!sseooy/41!1!gel!eny 31S `dWl (o) LOZ'OLS l£0 Ted uewzljnyl 9L spunj ggaj-uoA[ palsanbag d'auaffd #laauvutaofiad awoalnp aalj3afgolvA1 uotlylDIXIJIDN AlgnglaV djtnrjad 00405 00 000 `00£S slnlolgnS ainlan.gsvrfuj Rllunujujoj L000 OO,SZO'LL$ 00'000 '8b$ 0096 JNisnOH Al!I!geu!elsnS HO b'Wl (0)ZOZ'OL9 SL JaOWO IuawaoJo;u3 apo0 9L spun] ggaj-uoA[ paisanbag d3uagv #/aauvwjofiad amoalnp aajlaafgplyA1 uollvl!Jlx'JIVN dilnljad djjntjad 000SZO41 IS 00 '000 `86S slvlol9nS luaujawofud apoa 9000 luawdmb3 0040$ 006000'09$ L dd Al!I!q!ss000y/Al!l!gel!eny 31S HWl (340Z'OL9 3£O punoiBAe!d Ted seonl bL J04!uow pue ejaweo W04SAs 00 ,£94'LL$ 00'000 '99$ L dd Al!I!q!sseooy/Al!l!gel!eny 31S `dWl (o) LOZ'OLS d£0 Al!jno9s ' 6u!ly6!11ew9lx3 £ L 00 '00£'6$ 00"009 'LL $ L Ad Al!I!q!ssaooy/p!I!gel1eA`d 3lS t/Wl (040Z'OL9 4£0 i9lua0 Ueemiaol u6lsaQ ZL spunj ggaj-uoA[ palsanbag d3uaA?v #1a3uvura0frad amoalnp antlaafgplyA[ uotlVI!31XI4VM dllnzlaV djIatjad 00 em 69ZS 00 OOS `Z£IS slvlolgnS sluoujaaoiduij djjj!1lavd aPlgnd S000 a0ualo!A 00"000'ZL$ 00"000'89Z$ L JNisnOH 41!1!gepjolly Ha HINT (e) LOZ'OLS LO o!isawoQalesuaneH LL 00'000'0£$ 00 '000'Z8L$ L JNisnOH Al!I!gepjoll`d Ha HWl (e) LOZ'OLS LO dn dejS of 6u!nu!luo0 OL Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco-Community &z Economic Development Address 525 N Third Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301 Project Name Program Administration Contact Person Angie Pitman Telephone 509-543-5739 Fax 509-545-3441 Federal Tax ID Number CDBG Funds Requested $120,000 Match 0 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. CDBG funds are used to plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. 2 . Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. All CDBG activities in Pasco benefit primarily low-moderate income persons. Census tracts 2011 202, 203 BG 3&r 4 and 204 are 71% LMI, there are 24 ,190 persons, 17,171 of which are LMI. 3 . Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # All Strategy # All Objective # All Outcome # All 4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: This activity serves every type of eligible activity allowable under CDBG/HOME regs. Al - Bricks &r Mortar Project resulting in visual physical improvements (engineering & architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project cost ) Reduce Barriers, Public Facilities, Neighborhood Revititalization 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) LMA - 570.208(a)(1) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # 201, 202, 203, 204 Block Groups # All C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public Smicc / Housing — Unit of measure ispeople * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost I't Quarter 6047.50 People 4.96 $30,000 2° Quarter 6047.50 People 4.96 $30,000 3` Quarter 6047.50 People 4.96 $30,000 4` Quarter 6047.50 People 4.96 $30,000 TOTAL 24,190 1 1 4.96 1 $1201000 8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 800/b median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco $110,000 $1051000 $117,000 $105,000 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $110,000 for the purpose of administering the CDBG Program within the City of Pasco CDBG funds are used to plan, administer and deliver housing and Pasco CDBG Application Form 1 2010 community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 151550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: 120,000 0 12000 Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: 14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? If not funded at all, this activity would need to be paid from the city's general fund. If funded partially, plans and studies that require assistance of a consultant may be cancelled or postponed. Detailed Admin Budget 2010 Exhibit D Admin Services Fee 12 , 000 Annual Membership Fees 300 Central Stores Purchases 500 Courier & Delivery Services 200 County Services 50 FICA 3 , 575 Legal Advertising 200 Legal Reference Books 500 Life Insurance Premiums 75 Lodging-Meals-Mileage-Airfair 31000 Med/Dent Insurance 117600 Medicare 850 Misc Advertising 500 Misc Office/Operating Supplies 500 Misc Professional Services 12 , 125 Miscellaneous 500 Office Equipment 300 Overtime-Regular 27000 PERS 4 , 150 Public Information Advertising 250 Repair & Maint - Office Equipment 500 Salaries & Wages Regular 621425 Seminar/Training Registrations 11500 State Industrial 275 Subscriptions 11000 Telephone 11000 Vision Insurance 125 TOTAL $ 1207000 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time,supplies,etc.,what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Planning and administration of the CDBG and HOME programs will always be a necessary part of these grants.It is vital to the success of the program.Without successful planning and administration of the program activities.The program would not be in compliance with the HUD rules and regulations and Pasco would cease to be entitled to receiving them. 16. Check"yes"or"no"for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction/renovation? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service b. Economic Development c. Acquisition d. Public or community infrastructure/housing/facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas,writings,items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Rick White,Director C&rED Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name&Title Date 11 �: 11 ,� 11 �l ,ll ; 11 ill I r 11 50A 11 <; 11 OAF II'•.� ���Oi� ;p'��� o� �.�l I�!��.► �� OAF .III •�/� ���� / m I ��/� � 11 I o�� l l Polo l�% ,, �� l l Me, MA I - � , pool Max rf.10!P21 PR I A' P///i /./iii owl �.�► ��I •/�/�.% %%" % • vwmg�'F IMF 5—Ow ow j / ''''% Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco-Administrative&z Community SenRECEIVED Address 525 N Third Avenue (21.202) JUN n 1 2009 Project Name Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC OEVEWPMENT Contact Person Stan Strebel,Administrative&z Community Services Telephone (509)545-5757 Fax (509) 543-5758 Federal Tax ID Number CDBG Funds Requested $37,500 Match $45,500 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Youth Civic Center.This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for youth at risk covering low-to-moderate income Census Tract (202). 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual information. There are significant numbers of youth from low to moderate income families who are Considered at risk that benefit from participating in supervised recreation programs. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs(Attachment B)-what Goal,Strategy,Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal# V Strategy# V.2 Objective# Suitable Outcome# Availabili Living ty/Accessi Environm bility ent 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A) (Check only one box) A.High Priority ❑ B.Average Priority X❑ C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Providing quality programs such as the girl scouts, soccer tournaments,basketball tournaments and other recreational activities will improve the physical condition and build self esteem of youth. In addition such activities create an environment in which youth feel cared for and safe,which greatly reduces the possibility of youth being involved in negative outside influences such as gang activity. 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 B2 - Social Service Projects to address community needs (seniors, special needs, disadvantaged youth) . 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) LMA - 570.208(a)(1) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # 202 Block Groups # All C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. *Public Service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost I't Quarter 1,410 People 6.65 91375 2 Id Quarter 11410 People 6.65 91375 3 Quarter 11410 People 6.65 91375 4` Quarter 11410 People 1 6.65 91375 TOTAL 51640 People 1 6.65 37,500 8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income 4229 Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 5640 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco 30000 33,000 35,000 37,500 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $30,000 for a recreation specialist at this community center for the purpose of making a suitable living environment available to school age children that attend Lower-income households have improved quality of life through provision of necessities for their health and social well-being. We will make contact with the police department to detemine if there is less gang related activities in the surrounding area due to the community center being open. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland I Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 1 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 1 $70,000 1 $75,200 1 $80,400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: 37,500 19,100 City General Fund 56,600 Salaries OPERATIONS: 24,000 City General Fund 267400 Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER. (Describe) TOTAL 37,500 45,500 83,000 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: City General Fund 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? If other funding is not available, activities may be reduced if sufficient staff is not available 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Programming will be continued as long as funding is available. 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ X 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ X a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? X ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? X ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ X 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ X 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ X 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑ x a. Do you own the property? ❑ ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (choose one) a. Public Service X b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑ Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) . The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. 8 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 SUBMITTED BY: STA Al S7xeVL Signature of Aut rized Agency Official Printed Name & Title Date 9 a xz q ]yy. It e5 4if 5 i %A 8tt� fl�V jfCt ��i... K •_� e. +'1' �• It I it 4 t to tiz ZI Ilt P. M I-It 11 fi c s zP F+ ] ' " ' "l.z y C 3 W 'Sr YwyvTt. . 'Ki Pa,r� It It .� • o-, a �r� _ 5} 11 et� i " 9' �' F• }S�1e,r '� ° }' '+ s �7P `tSf' t. STr.SFt 3 t- 2 a tJ 3 - d Ave WdscbAla VA# ' 9303 ' ` Vt ». V ,„vry k b 47l .k I .._ .. ? VVv'� Fk S yi 1E� S. f fit' . !� .# c]. kj ov , s$ 3�i( _µ ,'` It tt, ataw , " _It ' " 'F . y? t3 ix i kty ] a Ij It 3 5'1 . .Y 11 p Irk 6 t It .p It It tt a a u 3 ! ii w v F a Olt a' 14 1 tIt PrI 41, 11 } n 'ly , _IC � o �tiiaC �J 'ti 4y it Vt �Y, ♦ y: �tE °a-d f 4t � a` ? B 1R'2s'� .. «- &' 1.4 ham+^` 'M1 tt �Yinni<iC 4b` 1F. � 6- 17 " 'N if3 ' �5 i . bo' Al r 1 3E :I v ^,ih ° Iq 'l q. 1 I ' � ,E ;u ] fL Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Pro9EGMED Applicant City of Pasco-Administrative&r Community Services _JUN �1009 Address 205 South Wehe(21.201) Project Name Martin Luther King Community Center RecreationIMMsECONOMiC DEVELOPMENT Contact Person Stan Strebel,Administrative&rCommunity Services Director Telephone 509-543-5757 Fax 509-543-5758 Federal Tax ID Number CDBG Funds Requested $37,500 Match $100,500 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Martin Luther King.This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA,Salvation Army and Campfire USA,who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to school age children and youth in Census Tract(201). 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual information. There are a significant numbers of youth from low to moderate income families who are considered at-risk that benefit from participation in supervised recreational programs and activities. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B)-what Goal,Strategy,Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal# V Strategy# V.2 Objective# Suitable Outcome# Availabili Living ty/Access Environm ibility ent 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A) (Check only one box) A.High Priority ❑ B.Average Priority ® C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Will provide structured and supervised Recreational activities such as Indoor Soccer Basketball Volleyball Art&t Crafts.This will offer a positive outlet for youth and giving them an alternative rather then turning to gangs and other illegal activities With the addition of Cyber Stop which in a community based internet&r Computer lab which operates 6 days a week for neighborhood&s community patrons to have the opportunity to 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 access the internet to search for emplg3 ent and to discover other resources that the users may not have been able for to access in the past due to not havin this his resource. B2 - Social Service Projects to address community needs (seniors, special needs, disadvantaged youth) . 5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) LMA - 570.208(a)(1) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # 201 Block Groups # All C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflateyour estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public Service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FfE jobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost Is` Quarter 1451 People $9375.00 2" Quarter 1451 People $9375.00 3 Quarter 1451 People $9375.00 4 Ih Quarter 1452 People $9375.00 TOTAL 5805 People $37,500.00 8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income 4330 Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 5805 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form ( 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco 30,000 33,000 35,000 37,300 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $30,000 for a recreation specialist at this community center for the purpose of making a suitable living environment available to school age children & Adults who attend the programs and activities offered at the MLKC. Lower-income households have improved quality of life through provision of necessities for their health and social well-being. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland. 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $419500 $46,650 $51,850 $569000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $705000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: 37500 30,500 City General 68,000 Salaries Fund OPERATIONS: City General Rent/Lease 35,000 Fund 357000 Utilities 41000 41000 Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: City General (Describe) 31,000 Fund 31,000 TOTAL 37,500 1009500 138,000 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: City General Fund 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? If other funding is not available, activities may be reduced if sufficient staff is not available 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Programming will be continued as long as funding is available. 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑ Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) . The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. 8 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 SUBMITTED BY: ,5rAr✓ %5vrxz4ffz, mczz 44Z 6 mac. -4ikE. c rok- Signature ofAuthorized Agency Official Printed Name & Title Date 9 i �� � ... i 9�iS t ryC t �.,� ; s�"i 3i�s ix � :' G� O � m* p ��� tea' •y'�4 r } Ida 0 IT s ttl E - it 5 " ,Z••F a I a , if dyStf ' Bl� ij. liTIAl Y_,.L_ Oil r e,_ AII IT m r � k 1 • f$i t � r Ali t Th. ". is i �l ° . {� C' `.G. ��rf k� 1 Y�V4, r� JCC � t� A 99301 NA, , c� - 45 'mac *4 SY c het: j p ai+ - ^- ° 41A.. tl r .[43 -7l ' C_E>c " kern ' C S ? _ e Ir r ri - .J x i{ m ft}b �' S wa iF - Y II,Ao i kI IT 1 It 'v ( , 16`� jt a Est ,e •.. o , I nitod, .. Y. yai Fi 1 � IjH l 4 A A- I Ili 1�fi5� t -, -x- 2 -- - :rta k CE y ' ' s iiri Y.F ` o ' 1 31s�7. 91^ 9 v 5 ; ( T �- Pasco CDBG Application Form 1 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco-Administrative&Community Services Address 1315 North 7th,Pasco (21.201,202, 203,204). RECEIVED Project Name Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist JUN 0 1 2009 Contact Person r�ru�sei�NP �GBNghgIG44 r�nn�n``-acr �ORImOI9TTr�LTA7T4QRRrOCPL CQf'IVI'CT7! Telephone Fax Federal Tax ID Number CDBG Funds Requested 37500 Match 200000 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly with support services,nutrition,health and living skills support. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual information. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B)-what Goal,Strategy,Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal# V Strategy# V.2 Objective# Suitable Outcome# Availabili Living ty/Accessi Environm bility ent 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A) (Check only one box) A.High Priority ❑ B.Average Priority ❑ C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: B2 - Social Service Projects to address community needs (seniors,special needs, disadvantaged youth). 5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) LMC - 570.208(a)(2) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # Block Groups # All C, ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Dcvclopmcnt — Unit of measure is FIE jobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1" Quarter 816 People 11.49 97375 2 rid Quarter 816 People 11.49 91375 3 Quarter 816 People 11.49 91375 Euarter 816 People 11.49 9,375 AL 3265 People 11.49 37,500 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 80% median income 3265 Number of elderly clients 3265 Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 3265 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco 20000 27500 31250 29000 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $20,000 for a recreation specialist at this community center for the purpose of making a suitable living environment available to seniors and disabled persons that attend. Lower-income households have improved quality of life through provision of necessities for their health and social well-being. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick'- Pasco - Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 1 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: 136,000 Salaries 37,500 99,000 City General Fund OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities 36,000 City General Fund 36,000 Supplies 131000 City General Fund 13,000 CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) 601000 City General Fund 60,000 TOTAL 377000 208,000 I 2451000 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: City General Fund 14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 you do? If other funding is not available, activities may be reduced if sufficient staff not available. 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Programming will be continued as long as funding is available. 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑ Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) . The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: 8 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 STA A -57A AAoe- A4wC.W3 D/Rze.roAt, S - Z9 ` 07 Signature V'Iffiorized Agency Official Printed Name &t Title Date 9 If '$i • j x t ':T xY, at' v i x;, f `w` ` : ' pdx"Y.� & o- d }� Ynb�s� 3 °. .y � ��,+ Y *a: $ `4 $ .F is �f' -u 4rx.: rfw P ; t 3 ` r f > iffilOfdl s'U8' ` t rd r F c sf r l r j . .� ice, '& e imp { sx s /t h IT- P ��r ? _� ! t.� yP x � v t v r" 1 It ���P.wu°``.'., s"° . s tP � t�`FI 1PG / t ?.�u�"'L'°."ti"Sr F'Ilk TPF ` g pp F C P it If ' 41 111 If IIr 1 -13 t 114 If 5 If- If Xf IT If Ea - , y ?S .{: t ate3�.w .,u `,`°`11.3h�.:4 V'�ar 1 t �`9 4 £ g :' 1 Ruby Strom t r p u i r f IT jx f ' '. S *, . , . m e T -. Ill i. u.3..,.. l k t x t x a j tff..fT If Ilk,manY„ {.2�i.", If I { ".�4' � 4f K'by •. f^ft t yyy� kt 4' . If "Net 41 T Tf R ^' et a C t Ji If 1 s ! 5 N att A € PW� GO VJA 9930 ` 1 s ; i mr Ir, x. f, t dY "» a '^ f t; T s it ♦ 6• yt rg 1 . P p Sit, Iffl Tr if dl r r y fy, Ay (y T L Ile If r t , .' — ?y i3 6� t r iii i ;� Y F N P If It ILL r i4 _ Y. � T f J �` e9t' Mar � tr�et�a � tF. ef�" .„ _ - ,yr _ — _ t txy 'J i OrWju If I ITT IN t TT- IT i� T{ t tl (• fl' �. a.: +3 a. ° .,�.+, t tr t «...._ _ 11 y� ^I III '`� e1 k RP it e �( ' Cr 9 t .ilGlu :rtt ai ' .+ r',t.— "'��� 1.. V 4 Ifl If raoirtft r -:C:',Y . 2_ a5 `� tic 1 '"aV'r xii� o '.iF9 ! f: trc lire nk 4 i i l > 9h Cfu . � 1t 3h70 ft. r Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant Pasco Downtown Development Address 110 S. 4th Ave. Pasco,Washington 99301 Project Name Pasco Specialty Kitchen Contact Person Victoria Silvernail Telephone 509-5454172 Fax 509-5454174 Federal Tax ID Number 91-1290894 CDBG Funds Requested 65,000.00 Match 40,420.00 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly will the CDBG funds be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. Describe your project and its location: In 2002 both groups, the City of Pasco, Washington and the Downtown Development Association, partnered on the development of an incubator kitchen to create specialty food businesses; that is now the Pasco Specialty Kitchen (PSK) 110 S. 4th Ave. Pasco. This property replaced two blighted properties and brought the possibility of new jobs and small businesses to a low to moderate income population. PSK helps small businesses with an affordable infrastructure, educational support and guidance with business decisions and marketing plans. PSK offer assistance to clients in the following areas: ■ Local, State and Federal Licensing ■ Insurance ■ Permits ■ Labeling & Packaging ■ Training Facility for Special Permits ■ Marketing ■ Business & Marketing Planning PSK has developed excellent working relationships with local commerce resources such as Columbia Basin Community Business Center, Benton Franklin Development Council and SCORE thusly providing a unique one-stop shop for new businesses. Assistance is provided to help clients understand their position in the market. Ongoing marketing by PSK provides client product exposure in both retail and wholesale markets in the Pacific Northwest , the world by way of PSK7s WEB site. PSK has the following Certifications and Approvals from the state of Washington: ■ Department of Health ■ Department of Agriculture ■ Organic Certification For Food Preparation and Processing 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 What exactly will the CDBG funds be used for: PSK offers potential new businesses access to an affordably and certified commercial kitchen to develop and perfect their products. Commercial food preparation equipment can be so costly in a start up business it can be the deciding point of not developing a business. Funding for food service businesses is extremely difficult to obtain from lending institutions for experienced food businesses and near impossible for startup operators. PSK is a Low Cost Pay Per Hour concept permitting people with very little available risk capital to incrementally develop and market food products in a real commercial kitchen 24 hours a day 7days a week and 365 days a year. This has permitted PSK's clients to bootstrap themselves into a self sustaining food service ventures be it retail or as a wholesaler to grocery outlets. Without PSK's resources these low income individuals would find it impossible to experience success as an entrepreneur. PSK's clients represent a wide ethnicity with African American, Hispanic, Asian and Caucasian present. The PSK facility is a 11,000 square foot building located in downtown Pasco. The building houses the equipment and resources shown below: ■ 4 Convection ovens ■ Walk4n Freezer ■ Walk4n Refrigerator ■ Commercial Bread Mixers ■ Compartmentalized Lockable Storage Space ■ 2 Stove Top Ranges with Lower Ovens • Wireless Internet Access ■ Client's Product Store The funding is critical for the growth of our clients and the continued operation of PSK. This grant helps pay the following expenses; ■ 1 Full Time and Part-Time salary ■ Payroll Taxes ■ Administrative Expenditures ■ Equipment Purchases ■ Administrative Services Contracts This grant makes it possible for small business to keep their start-up cost affordable. We charge the clients an affordable fee for kitchen time, freezer and refrigeration space and dry storage. Keeping these costs affordable is vital to the success of our small business clients. We need to keep this valuable asset in operation for the City of Pasco and our local economy. 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Description of persons you will be serving: We have clients that are Low to moderate income; Pasco High Students, Elderly and Retired Owners, Women Head of Household and Minorities. In addition to our regular clients, we provide space for high school students learning about the food processing business and how to create a specialty food business. They learn to create products, food costs, packaging marketing. The Kitchen serves as a base for Pasco High School Commercial Foods Academy that provides educational training related to the food industry and entrepreneurship. Our Pasco High has 62% of their students are low-moderate income. This program is a base for future small businesses in our area it open the prospect of future business growth and the creation of more low to moderate jobs This is an economic development tool designed to create jobs and accelerate growth and success of small businesses through business support, resources and services. Our incubator businesses create jobs revitalize neighborhoods add new products to the market and strengthen our local economy. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. 56% of Pasco is Latino with 38% is low to moderate income Source: US Census 2000 47% Latino owned and operated businesses engage in service related business activity and 44% engage in retail type activities. Source: Profile of Downtown Pasco, 2000, Broz PSK addresses the unmet need in our community by: ■ Supporting activities that improve the quality of the local workforce and prepare lower income workers to access living wage jobs. ■ Provides incubation resources and assistance to burgeoning entrepreneurs, micro- enterprise and other food industry based businesses. Pasco is in the heart of a large agricultural area with over 350 fresh products seasonally available. Small businesses utilize these products to create retail and wholesale products that when added to the local commerce create jobs and strengthens our local economy. 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 1 Strategy # 4&5 Objective # 1&4&5 Outcome # 3 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority X B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: A. High Priority By providing an affordable commercial incubator kitchen a food facility and assistance to business development, marketing and training. The PSK(located in downtown Pasco) meets the following; Strategic Action Plan Goals: * Goal 1.Stategy #1 Support business that create permanent jobs for low-moderate income residents Goal 1. Strategy #4 Support activities that improve the quality of local workforce and prepare lower income and special needs workers to access living wage. * Goal 1. Strategy #5 Support facilities, infrastructures or other eligible improvements to assist businesses that need economic development assistance by virtue of their qualifying physical, environment, economic or demographic conditions; to create living wage jobs and/or economic opportunities. * Objective # 3 Create Economic Opportunity - This objective applies to the type of Activities related to economic development commercial revitalization or job creation Our Proposal satisfies: A. High Priority as an economic development project resulting in the creation of jobs through as affordable rental facility business development, educational training and work skill location in downtown Pasco 8 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 b. Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # 202 Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. X Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderateAncome employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates - the numbers provided will he used to assess your proposed project 's success. •Public Service/Housing - Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer - Unit of treasure is households • Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development - Unit of measure is FrE jobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1st Quarter 11 51FTE 6PT $1477.28 $16250.00 2n Quarter 13 5FTE 8PT $1250.00 $16250.00 3rd Quarter 14 5FTE 9PT $1160.72 $16250.00 4 th Quarter 11 5FTE 6PT $1477.72 $16250.00 TOTAL 35FTE 35FTE $65000.00 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income 12 Number of clients below 50% median income 8 Number of clients below 80% median income 6 Number of elderly clients 2 Number of minority clients 19 Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 35 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick 9 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: INSERT MAP HERE A: 110 S 4th Ave, Pasco, WA 99301-5507 --, MAP1QWES': W Henry St <'; W rtibt��s2t J p�4U m ft z St �a tet St .A � Sylvester C> Park Gtk St ��, St 15hoMan St rirev St W e W� ille 5t a t��vtts �t ri'p A Go6ume"' a Z Z st Z W t e St Z N 9 q 3 7 sY 'Ile CA �c� W+rolumh� U' rap�ih St a'� r u, d• W � � � h es WASt a c � Lq W B St - � 1 E 8 Mercier { E C to AinS ,Utrh Park r i� Q sr �Q ,C, a 4C az �t3 02006MapQuest) c. ,L �� Map Data 802008NAVTEQt or TPIeAtlas soft t wamL-al.�--rjj-, 1�., r %. MAP CURRENT BUILDING PREVIOUS BUILDINGS CONVERTED TO THE PASCO -E- SPECIALTY KITCHEN 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic _ Page 4 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco 65,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 65,000.00 10 What impact will your project have in the community2 How will you measure your success? Our agriculture community produces 350 products! Create jobs for low to moderate income residents accelerate growth and success of small business. Our incubator businesses create jobs revitalize neighborhoods add new products to the market and strengthen our local economy. The lowest income in the Tri-Cities is Pasco 38% of the households make less that 25,000.00 a year. Our facility helps create jobs and facilitate small business owners that have jobs and are willing to invest in their own small business with help from our project we can help and have helped businesses succeed We measure our success by the 30 plus Active clients now using the Commercial incubator Kitchen also the 53 jobs we have created 33 jobs are low to moderate 62% and our requirement is 51%. Our project has created 17 services and more than 80 products that we still support and have continued to increase our products each year with the growth of our clients and the addition of new clients every year. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $297150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $517850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 1 $6000 1 $70,000 $75,200 1 $80,400 $85,500 10 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Expense Funds Funds PERSONNEL: 337500.00 0 38,000.00 Salaries 4500.00 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Clients pay for Utilities 177440.00 use 17,440.00 Supplies 1000.00 2500.00 Of the PSK 3500.00 And our Retail Shop CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials 0 129000.00 121000.00 Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: 41000.00 10,000.00 Clients pay for 14,000.00 (Describe)Adim 109000.00 use 107000.00 Equipment 10,480.00 Of the PSK 10,480.00 All other And our Retail Expenses Shop TOTAL 65,000.00 40,420.00 105,420.00 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: We have the source of income from our Clients usage fee and also our Retail Shop. We also have a contract with the Pasco High School for their Commercial Foods Academy they have a block of time they use though the school year for their marketing and product creation class. We are always looking for additional sources of income. 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? We would have to revisit our budget and have to make some very difficult decisions on equipment needs of the Clients. We would have to consider reducing our hours of operation. 11 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) We will continue to expand our client base. This year we are looking into the possibility of the High School expanding their program to 2 classes. We are continually researching other funding sources. The possibility of expanding the kitchen; possibly another location that would contain 24 full kitchens that these clients could have a soft step into a full time kitchen at a incubator cost we would hope to partner with the Port of Pasco or the City of Pasco 16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the sub recipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ X 2. Is this a new activity for the sub recipient? ❑ X a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? X ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? X ❑ 3. Does the sub recipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ X 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? El X 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? El X 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑ X a. Do you own the property? ❑ X b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ X 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development X c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑ 12 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and are not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: 4igna a of Authorized Age y Official Printed Name & Title Date May 28, 2009 Victoria Silvernail Executive Director 13 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application 2010 CDBG Program Year Economic Development Special Attachment #2 Complete this page if you are proposing to provide an "Economic Development" project 1. Please list the DUNS Number of your business: #147706498 2. This is a: X non-profit ❑ for-profit ❑ faith-based 3. Describe how your project will make the most effective use of CDBG funds? This is an economic development tool designed to create jobs and accelerate growth and success of small businesses through business support, resources and services. Our incubator businesses create jobs revitalize neighborhoods add new products to the market and strengthen our local economy. 4. Is there leverage of other funds? We have a fee structure a user fee that we charge the clients of the kitchen and we have retail sales that adds to our funds. We also have a contract with the Pasco School District for the Commercial Food Academy that uses the kitchen for their class. We are constantly looking for additional funding sources. We are continually adding new clients 5. How will you assure that CDBG funds are not substituted for other non-federal investment? We understand the allowable expenses for these funds. Salary, administration costs, equipment, lease rentals, travel. We also have a complete monthly balancing report for the Pasco Downtown Development Association accounting department. 6. Can you demonstrate that your project will meet the minimum federal CDBG threshold of providing one full time equivalency job (32 hours per week) per $35,000 of CDBG funds, or provide goods or services to residents of a low-moderate income (LMI) area, such that the number of LMI persons residing in the area served amounts to at least one LMI person per $350 of CDBG investment, and that at least more than one half (51%) of the total jobs created will be filled by very low, low and moderate income persons? How will you make sure that the jobs will be made available to very low, low and moderateAncome persons? Every year we have created more than the required jobs. In 2008 we created 41-FTE and 7 were low to moderate income and our funds for the 2008 CDBG Grant was $50,000.00. We work with each and every client and have forms that they sign that they will make the jobs created available to low- moderate labor force first. We also have graduates of the Paso Specialty Kitchen that are adding new jobs and they have also signed forms to hire low to moderate first and they have done just that. 15 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 7. Is your request being used for business incentives or for recruitment of a business from another city or state? If yes, describe in detail. Are the proposed jobs existing positions or are they new? We do except clients from the Tri-City area they are new jobs except with our graduates some are new as they expand and some are exiting position being filled we only count the NEW jobs S. Show the number of new permanent jobs projected to be created (seasonal jobs do not count): 24 FTE 22PT 11 FTE = 35FTE Projected job Title # FTE jobs Created # Part Time jobs # FTE jobs Filled # Part Time jobs Created by LMI Filled by LMI Caterer 4 FTE 4 PT 1 FTE LMI 4 PT LMI Waiter/Waitress 6 FTE 6 PT 8 FTE LMI 6 PT LMI Food Service 9 FTE 6 PT 10 FTE LMI 6 PT LMI Worker Cook 4FTE 4PT 2FTE LMI 4PT LMI Sales 1 FTE 2 PT 2PT LMI Re resentative ** LMI jobs refer to anyjob that can be held by a person with no advanced training or education beyond high school - or a job that the business agrees to hire unquah ed persons for and provide training. 16 1 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant Pasco Downtown Development Association-PDDA Address Pasco Downtown (21. 202) Project Name Downtown Facade Improvement (4 facades) Contact Person Gloria Garcia Telephone 509-545 -0738 Fax 509-545- 8801 Federal Tax ID Number 914290894 CDBG Funds Requested 80000 Match 20000 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. CDBG funds are used to support business to continue downtown facade improvements, for new projects are anticipated for 2009 (Census Tract 202) . 2 . Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. Pasco's downtown commercial district serves an area of Pasco with primarily low-to-mod residents . The area contains old commercial buildings in need of rehabilitation. This rehabilitation is expected to increase business flow and improve area appearance. 3 . Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 1 Strategy # 1.5 Objective # Economic Outcome # Sustainab Opportun ility ity 4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Al - Bricks &t Mortar Project resulting in visual physical improvements (engineering &z architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project cost. ) Reduce Barriers, Public Facilities, Neighborhood Revititalization 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) 5 I i 2010 LMA - 570.208(a)(1) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b . ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # 202 Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public Service I Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homcbuycr — Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FIEjobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost Is' Quarter People 2 Id Quarter 3r Quarter M 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Number of clients below 800/o median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 1 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco 80000 6 201. 0 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $2,000 to rehabilitate owner-occupied businesses in a targeted area for the purpose of sustaining economic development. Lower-income residents obtain or retain living wage jobs and/or access economic opportunities. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland W800/0 $361300 erson 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People ,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 2,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $641800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: 80,000 20,000 Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: 80,000 207000 Participants Engineering Match Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL $80,000 $80,000 $20,000 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: 14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? It is anticipated that 4 facades will be improved with $ 80,000, but if full request funding is not received then impact will be adjusted accordingly. 7 2 € 10 15 . If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc. , what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ® El- 5 . Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) . The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Gloria Garcia, Vice-President 06/01/2009 Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name & Title Date 8 t.i•• �\. t: 1 \ �� dW r V. _ . 1 SA \ -=� .�/.\ �• .fit°" ..-�'. \ � �5��� N `' �'•\ Legend f._._j Z6ne 2 Boundary Downtown Pasco Business Improvement District January 2006 The yellow highlighted area indicates the area of 4th& Lewis. RECEIVED Pasco CDBG Application Form 1010 COMMUNICbMW MifWfDavelopment Block Grant Application — 2010 Program Year Applicant Benton Franklin Community Action Committee Address 720 West Court Pasco WA 99352 Project Name Energy Efficient Healthy House Program Contact Person David Odom or Judith A. Gidley Telephone 509-545-4042 Fax 509-545-1449 Federal Tax ID Number 91-0792238 CDBG Funds $20,000 Match $20,000 Requested 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. 1. This proposal's goal is to increase the energy efficiency of homes owned or rented by low-income households; to correct combustion related indoor air quality problems and to provide energy conservation education to the low- income consumer. The Washington State Office of Community, Trade and Economic Development sponsors the Energy Matchmakers Program authorized through Chapter 70.164 RCW. The program is designed to leverage matching funds, and a community can participate by providing a dollar for dollar match. We use an existing energy conservation program format of policies and specifications developed by BFCAC and DCTED. Households to be served would be the very low-income (50% of median). We have a list of eligible households who have already qualified and add to this list through referrals of new households from our Energy Assistance Program. Although energy conservation programs have been operating for 25 years through local electric utilities, combustion heated housing has been ignored, even though they are usually the oldest, least efficient homes. By taking advantage of this opportunity for leverage funds, this program can help as many as ten households cost- effectively, and make available additional revenue to the local economy at a time when other resources are dwindling. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. BFCAC administers Energy Conservation programs, which serves low-income 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 1 2010 residence who are either elderly, disabled and/or families with young children living in the City of Pasco . These programs have limited funding for homes with combustion heating sources (oil , gas , propane , and wood ) . 3 . Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal , Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # IV Strategy # 2 Objective # 2 Outcome # 2 4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B . Average Priority C . Low Priority ® D . No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority It satisfies C in preserving affordable housing by making them more durable , energy efficient and correcting health and safety problems . 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate- income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d) a . ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b . ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # Block Groups # c. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele : (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d . ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6 . Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7 . Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010 . For example , how many unduplicated persons will be served , how many homes assisted , how many jobs created or retained . Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public Service / Housing - Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer - Unit of measure is households * Economic Development - Unit of measure is * Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses FTE jobs and / or businesses 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 15 Quarter 2 Quarter 3` Quarter 4 Quarter 8 8 $2 ,500 $20,000 TOTAL 8 8 $2 ,500 $20,000 8 . Of the total " number served" listed in the above table , please categorize your clientele by the following criteria : Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income Eight households Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Two households Number of minority clients Four households Number of disabled clients Two households Total Pasco residents served Eight households 9 . What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Richland 15, 000 15,000 11 ,000 9,400 Pasco 20, 000 20,000 20,000 20,000 10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? Provide eight households with energy efficiency and healthy homes . 11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible) . These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010 . 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $ 13,600 15,550 $17, 500 $ 19,450 $21 ,000 $22 , 550 $24, 100 $25,650 50% $229700 $25,900 $29, 150 $32,400 $35,000 $37 ,600 $40,200 $42 , 750 80% $369300 $41 ,500 $46,650 $519850 $560000 $60, 150 $64,300 $682450 Media $45 ,400 $51 ,800 $58 ,300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500 n 12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses . List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds . Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds . Expense Requested Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET CDBG Funds Funds PERSONNEL : $19000 $79800.00 WA State $8, 800 Salaries Energy Matchmaker OPERATIONS : $500800 $500 Rent/Lease $200.00 $200 Utilities $50800 $50.00 $ 100 Supplies CONSTRUCTION : $189950.00 $ 11 ,450 .00 $309400.00 Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: ( Describe) TOTAL $209000 $209000 $40,000 13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe : Yes 14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request , what will you do? If only a portion of the request is received then fewer homes will be completed . 15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time , supplies , etc. , what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) The staff time in the CDBG budget is estimated to cover environmental reviews , lead clearances and reporting which are requirements of HUD but not Energy Matchmaker Funds . 8 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 16 Check "yes" or " no" for each of the following questions : Assessment Question I s Z No I . Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? 2 . Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3 . Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5 . Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation ? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage ® ❑ requirements? 7 . What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities Certifications and Assurances [/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached , understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) . The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration . I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs . All Proposals will become the property of the City, and [/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas , writings , items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: . Judith A. Gidle , Executive Director 5 a o gnature of Authorized Agency of)(ciaf Printed Name & Title Date 9 i RECEI V w Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant Habitat for Humanity Tri Cities aka Tri County Partners Habitat for Human Address 313 Wellsian Way,Richland WA 99352 Project Name A Brush With Kindness Contact Person Theresa Richardson,Executive Director Telephone 509/943-5555 Fax 509/943-1693 Federal Tax ID Number Match GIK/Volunteers/Private CDBG Funds Requested $24,000 Funds 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. A Brush with Kindness (ABWK)is a construction service of Habitat that focuses on minor repair,painting,weather stripping and landscaping. It is part of a continuum of construction services provided by Habitat affiliates using the Habitat Model. The Habitat Model considers: Demonstrated need;Ability to Pay;and Willingness to Partner. Specifically,the need is determined by an inspection of the property;the ability to pay is determined by their income and the scope of the work to be done;and their willingness to partner aka sweat equity,is still important component. Most ABWK projects are 1 or 2 days,so the number of hours required are adjusted. If the homeowner is unable to work alongside the volunteers,other options may be available (e.g.,friends,relatives,classroom, or non-construction activities. We propose focusing this effort in Census Track 202 of Pasco, WA ABWK will partner with current homeowners who are below 60%HUD median income needing exterior repair work and light landscaping improvements. This program will serve the elderly and disabled who can not otherwise afford this work being.done on their homes. While we will use donated labor and materials,there will be projects where there will be a cash outlay for product and staff co effort. Staff�oordinat on identify ill be n needed to a specific area to launch this revitalization ident' the individuals served and coordinate the volunteer effort. ABWK is needed because there are low-income homeowners who are unable to afford exterior repair work thereby the nei hborhood ride deteriorates. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual information. 0 people living in Census tract 202 are low to moderate income 4229 people of the 564 = 75% 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? outcome # 3 Goal # 1V__ Strategy # =_ Objective # ? 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) D. No Priority ❑ A. High Priority X B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ g Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: ABWK results in visual physical improvements supporting neighborhood preservation and revitalization. These activities are aimed at improving the neighborhood, helping to make homes more livable and viable by providing benefit to persons a d services es thatlsusstain the l manating slums or blighted area through multiple activities and service nei hborhood. This project is in a geographically targeted ar frosubstandard to revitalization, standard conditions , current owner occupied units to Ell ii a home 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, ) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program data b. X Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census Census Tract # 202 Block Groups # C, ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Homeless persons [] Severely disabled adults ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV F1 illiterate persons ❑ Abused children Migrant farm workers ❑ Battered spouses d, ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. unduplicated 7. Provide program benchmarks homes ass seed, how many jobs crea an ted or retained. Do not inflate persons will be served, how many your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. " Homcbuyer - Unit of measure is households `Public scrvice/Housing - Unit of measure is people • Economic Devclopment - Unit of measure is FfEjobs and I or businesses " Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost $6,000 Is Quarter 2 Houses $3,000 $3,000 61000 2° Quarter 2 Houses 61000 Houses 2 $3,000 3 Quarter 61000 Houses $3,000 4` Quarter 2 $245000 TOTAL 8 g . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 ........... following criteria: 6 FNumberof below 30% median income 2 below 50% median income below 80% median income 3 Number of elderly clients 3 Number of minority clients 2 Number of disabled clients 8 Total Pasco residents served 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick None Richland None None Pasco our project have in the community? How will you measure your success? 10. What impact will y p j affordable housing; An ABWK program will: Increase the number of families living in safe, decent, the base of Increase the number of volunteer opportunities forcurrent volunteers;e business sponsors with dditional volunteers by providing a different type g g opportunities for smaller projects; Create opportunities to develop n CO city/county ative relationships governments local the community (neighborhood churches, comet ty g businesses, schools, etc ) We will measure success by tracking community engagement, completed projects, and families served. The following are the magnum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded 2010. rams (80% is the 11. g maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning Vv� w �F rvS people 1 Person 2 People M3 People 4 People 5 People 6 22 550 $24,100 $25,650 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $ 50% $22,700 $251900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80� $362300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68, 0 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,55000 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget sted r this expenses project.List any other sources ofBfund ou will are requesting will be applied toward th use to match with the CBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds D requested and all other source funds. IN E ense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET xp 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Funds Funds PERSONNEL: $2,400 Donations Individuals Salaries Corporate/Church OPERATIONS: N/A N/A N/A Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering $21,600 GIK Valspar Paints Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: N/A Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL $24,000 $5,000 $29,000 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Valspar Paints is a secured national sponsor for A Brush With Kindness Other GIK support is coming from Towing Companies to remove unwanted vehicles, First Aid support from a local hospital as needed; and incentive gift certificates for neighborhood youth involvement. The Habitat board has approved $5,000 as seed dollars to support the launch. 14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? We will scale back the amount of projects we could support. However, through leveraging community engagement, our ultimate vision is to revitalize entire declining neighborhoods and regain a sense of pride in homeownership. 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc. , what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) We hope that by launching this project and people seeing the results, that more corporate, church, and volunteer engagement will want to be involved and thereby creating sustainable support. This proposal is to ask for seed money to gain a foothold and then increase sustainability by setting up a payment schedule with the recipients. Factors to be considered are lowering qualifying AMI. The repayment would be at 0% interest for the work done on the home and a schedule that would not be greater than 10% of their monthly income. The income received would then go into an account to fund future ABWK projects" 8 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the sub recipient new to the CDBG program? X ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the sub recipient? X ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑ ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ ❑ 3. Does the sub recipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ X 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ X 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ X 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? X a. Do you own the property? ❑ X b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? X ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities X Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and are not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Theresa Richardson, Executive Director May 25, 2009 Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name &r Title Date 9 1 , IMP (y e N i _ O , If + _ in o *�-. sip 1 A 's a t rA r+ Q 1 ! Al jis b Ss no°ESS 41 " s ) t s � rz�:y-S b F � W • � kts ��.. 777r777 4 0. T ij ` rry i sr� �y i 1 :. 1 2 0 O a O+ 0 40 aj as a u 3 4 0 CL O 0 O oQ °� pas 3 . F a ' v CL Sap° v � o p SS a P Q 't - j► � - ece cn `g o PL s r A ] V p O. 4 O A Ac 00. ; O O 0Am 3q or 0 LL M � fQfa�' O4 � � A 4 qh S H 3 0 O - Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco-Community & Economic Development Address Census tract 202 Project Name CHIP Minor Rehab Program (4 households) Contact Person Angie Pitman Telephone 509-543-5739 Fax 509-545-3499 Federal Tax ID Number CDBG Funds Requested $ 20,000 Match $20,000 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. Provide 4 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards improvements (Census Tract 202) , 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # IV Strategy # IV. 2 Objective # Decent Outcome # Affordabil Housing ity 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ® D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Cl - Bricks & Mortar Project resulting in preservation of affordable housing through rehabilitation or acquisition/rehabilitation (engineering Esc architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project cost. 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 LMH - 570. 208(a)(3) a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # 202 Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. *Pubiic Service /Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of mcasure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FiEjobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1" Quarter 2,d Quarter 3'd Quarter 1 Households 5000 5000 4` Quarter 3 15000 15000 TOTAL 4 20000 20000 8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income 1 Number of clients below 50% median income 3 Number of clients below 80% median income Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 4 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco 0 37,500 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 The CDBG program will provide $20,000 to provide minor household repair or energy efficient health and safety improvements for 4 very low income households for the purpose of making housing affordable for these households. Lower-income persons have access to decent, safe and sanitary affordable housing. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $247100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $251900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 ff% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 ian $45,400 $51,800 $581300 $64,800 $70,000 $751200 $80,400 $85,500 12 . Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials 20,000 20,000 Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL 201000 1 1 20,000 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Funds for HOME rehabilitation and CAC weatherization are secured. This project will be combined with other housing programs for a comprehensive program that will cover rehabilitation (HOME) , weatherization (CDBG), and minor household repair. 14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? There would be no funding available to serve LMI households with minor household repair needs. Pasco CDBG Application Form [ 2010 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc. , what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name &t Title Date Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant Elijah Family Homes Address PO Box 3027 Richland WA 993544540 Project Name Continuing to Step Up Contact Person Barbara Puigh Telephone 783-7077 Fax 735-0730 Federal Tax ID Number 204058168 CDBG Funds Requested $ .2 ;000 ' - Match $ 303000 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. Elijah Family Homes (EFH hereinafter) provides housing assistance and supportive services to families whose application for public housing has been rejected. EFH currently supports eight families whose income is extremely low (below 30% of area median income). These families have twenty-seven children. EFH would like to support more families and expand its area of operation to include Pasco. Accordingly, EFH is requesting Pasco CDBG funds to acquire a three bedroom duplex or comparable property to be rented to EFH clients. Our mission is to provide safe, secure, affordable housing. EFH will be looking in neighborhoods where the residents have low to moderate income and take pride in their living conditions. EFH will first look at the target neighborhoods where Pasco is focused on the Community Housing Improvement Program. If there is not available housing to meet our criteria, we will look in other areas. EFH would like to keep its options open to select the type of property, since we are dependent on the type of property on the market at the time the funds are available. Ideally, EFH is looking for a duplex, but would accept two single family dwellings on adjacent lots. If a property is available that would be more cost effective to rehabilitate, EFH would like the flexibility to select that property. The determining factor in our selection will be the property that most meets clients' needs, at a cost-effective price. This property will serve two families at a time. EFH plans to be around for a long time and expects this property to serve a number of different families over the years. We are relatively new, but our infrastructure is established and progressive. Our prior year strategic plan is appended to this application. Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 1 of 10 - - - - - - - - Grants/CDBG P-asjco1%28_09/bz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Because EFH may be unknown to many of the people who read this application, we would like to describe ourselves further. EFH owns a duplex in Richland obtained through CDBG funding in 2008. EFH provides rent subsidies to landlords for six other families who live in Richland, Kennewick and West Richland. The proportion of rent paid by the tenants is on a sliding scale, based on income. EFH tenants are a special-needs population. The children and parents have experienced trauma. Most of the children had been removed from their parents' care in the past (either by the state or their relatives because the children were neglected) and are now reunited. To be eligible for EFH assistance, our clients must be making changes to improve their lives. They must have one or more children under age 18. Before being accepted into EFH, they have successfully completed family and personal rehabilitation programs to have their children returned to their care. For example, if addiction is in their past, they must provide treatment documentation to prove drug and alcohol abstinence for at least one year. EFH clients often do not have a supportive family safety net. They are often families who have experienced multiple generations of poverty; substance abuse, child abuse, domestic violence and poor education. A major goal of EFH is to break this cycle. EFH prefers duplex housing because the two families living side by side can be supportive to one another. If the parents have a history of substance abuse, we have found that the relapse rate is higher among those who have been clean for shorter periods of time. Clients must have at least a year of documented sobriety before being accepted into our program. We attempt to place a new family next door to one that has been clean for two or more years. Supportive services distinguish EFH from other housing assistance programs. EFH provides the safety net while parents are completing education and beginning employment. EFH continues to demand accountability, while providing friendship and role models. Our clients have regular contact with volunteer mentors. Clients have random drug urinalysis tests at least monthly, if drug abuse was in their history. The clients attend monthly group meetings to address common problems, learn skills and have fun. Our clients came a long way before they were accepted into EFH and we want them to be able to continue their journey in a positive, independent direction. EFH also offers supportive services to people on our waiting list. During the past year, grants provided by some of our community partners, including the Benton-Franklin/Burbank Community Public Health and Safety Network and Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities, have assisted in financing therapy and children's sporting and artistic activities. For examples, these funds paid for a high school boy to participate in school-sponsored sports, families were given summer swimming passes, families attended performances presented by Academy of Children's Theatre, and younger children enrolled in gymnastics, soccer and T ball EFH is a transitional housing program in that we expect our tenants to be on a continuum of moving to greater independence While EFH provides a transitional step for tenants, Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 2 of 10 _ _ _ -Gxants/CDBG-Paaco]5_2$99/bz- - - - - _ - - -- - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 EFH itself is not transitional housing by the traditional definition based on time of service. Although we would like our clients to be self-sufficient in three years, we do not have a hard and fast deadline for continued services. Unless there are very substantial reasons, EFH would not ask a family to move during the school year. All EFH supported children remained in the same school from September 2008 to June 2009. Ideally, when a family moves from our property, the children will remain in the same school area. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. EFH was started to address the unmet need of decent, safe, secure, affordable housing for Tri-Cities families who cannot obtain housing through the normal channels and who have no family safety net to assist them. The federally-mandated homeless `point in time count administered by the Benton Franklin Community Action Committee each year identifies the homeless in our area. In January y2009, 474 people (including 93 in jail) identified themselves as homeless. In January 2007, the number was greater and reported as 306 minor age children and 484 adults. The primary reasons given for homelessness, by those completing the survey, were alcohol and/or drug addiction, criminal record, domestic violence or family beak up and recent discharge from prison. Surveys in 2008 and 2009 have shown a decrease in the number of homeless people, but the reasons remain. The numbers, though improved, have not eradicated the problems. Interestingly, the 2009 point in time count shows a large increase in the number of people at high risk of becoming homeless. EFH fills a gap for a special needs population. The people we serve are a special needs population because they are families with low income, with children, who do not qualify for public housing. Although EFH is quite tolerant of mistakes in tenants past, EFH does not accept sex offenders. Our choice of tenants is those who are on a continuum of improving their lives. The area may show an increase in homelessness when the survey is done next year. The occupancy rate for rental units in the Tri-Cities is 971yo, according to a recent survey reported in the Tri-City Herald. Because the occupancy rate is high, landlords are charging higher rents. The net effect for low-income families is to make housing more unavailable to them. Landlords are rejecting people, such as EFH-type tenants, in favor of more reliable tenants. This makes rental units, such as EFH is describing in this application, even more vital. Recently an EFH tenant made an appointment with a landlord on a Saturday to view a three-bedroom apartment. When she arrived., there were also eleven other people there to view the same apartment. No surprise, the apartment was rented to someone else, probably someone with a better financial and social history. Nearby communities, such as Spokane and Yakima, offer a suitable number of beds Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 3 of 10 - - -- -Grants/GDBG Pasce/S 28 O9/hz-- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 identified as "transitional housing." In the Tri-Cities, the number of units is more limited, with only Oxford Houses and four other transitional housing units available. All of these units limit the number of children who can stay in them. Additionally, the type of housing may be unsuitable for children in any case. Children's safety and security in their homes and neighborhoods are a primary focus in selection of EFH housing. Many of our families are referrals from Safe Babies, Safe Moms (a program of the Benton- Franklin Health District working with mothers of young children who are in drug rehabilitation), Family Drug Court (no longer in operation), Adult Drug Court or Department of Social and Health Services. According to social workers and educators, children who move during the school year lose about three months education with every change of school. In unstable families, children often have to move several times during a year, resulting in loss after loss of educability. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # IV Strategy # 1 Objective # 2 Outcome # I The goal that best describes our project is "Improve Affordable Housing Opportunities for Lower-Income Individuals and Households" If our Richland duplex experience serves as a model, Pasco will find that EFH additionally fulfills other community priorities such as reducing the number of homeless people, revitalizing neighborhoods and abating lead paint. The strategy that best describes our project is "add to the existing stock of affordable units by developing rental housing infill areas or targeted neighborhoods, consistent with local comprehensive plans" Our project also fits into other strategies of improving the quality of existing affordable housing stock. On the continuum, EFH is working toward opportunities for our clients, with programs like Habitat for Humanity. The objective that best describes our project is "Decent Housing", but in the process, EFH is definitely creating a suitable living environment. The outcome that best describes our project is "improve availability/accessibility", but improving affordability and improving sustainability are also important to the project. Although we do not have to choose an indicator, EFH would like to point out that if we obtain a property that needs major rehabilitation, our objective would be to make it energy efficient by Energy Star standards, as well as environmentally appropriate. Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 4 of 10 I Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority ® C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: The priority focus is "bricks and mortar projects resulting in creation or preservation of housing for ... special needs population ... ." The impact of EFH owning a duplex to house two families will continue and expand the positive influence EFH is making in the community. We have concluded that the best way to deal with generational poverty, substance abuse, domestic violence, crime and financial irresponsibility is to attend to the needs of families who are sincerely trying to step up to a better life. While we subsidize their housing, they concentrate on plans and work to become healthy, safe and more self- sufficient. Our families integrate most successfully into neighborhoods that are a step above that in which they led their previously destructive lives. They cannot afford to move into these better neighborhoods by their own means. EFH looks for housing in established neighborhoods populated by law-abiding people. Most of our clients have low paying jobs or are learning career skills. While EFH does not specifically target projects to assist disadvantaged youth, our rental subsidies keep the families stable, which results in better educational outcomes. The property EFH obtains may very well revitalize the neighborhood in which our clients relocate. The duplex that we purchased in Richland was physically improved to bring it up to code with a new basement access window and exterior lead paint abatement. With a grant from Richland Rotary, the bathroom was renovated. With another grant from Columbia Center Rotary and a discounted price from Prudhomme Construction Company, the yard fence was replaced. The neighbors helped with cleaning up the yard. Another person anonymously donated a storage shed. Although EFH has not selected partners for this project, we are confident based on past experience that we will find both financial and in-kind partnerships. We will continue to apply to banks and religious organizations for dollars. We have discussed partnering with Habitat for Humanity's new in-kind "Brush with Kindness" exterior painting and landscaping program. Pasco High, Tri-Cities Area Technical School or Columbia Basin Community College may be open to student projects that can be incorporated into the interior or landscaping of the property. We will try to incorporate neighbors and other volunteer organizations into yard beautification. Until EFH acquires a specific property and determines the amount of restoration required, it is hard to project partnering needs. Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 5 of 10 - - - - - - -Grants/�DB�Pasco/S_2d=o91bz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract f# Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderateAncome employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. EFH cannot identify a property at this time, so a map is not attached We have checked the real estate listings in several areas of Pasco. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success * Public Service/Housing— Unit of m casum ispeople *Hotrebuyer— unit of m zisum is?musehAls *Rehabilitation— Unit of measare is houses *Economic Devclopmrnt — Unit of measure is FTE jobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost Is` Quarter Projected 8 people at a time, but multiple People x families over years 2n Quarter 0 0 3rd Quarter 0 0 4 th Quarter 0 0 TOTAL 8 2 * This chart asks for unduplicated persons. If we were able to fill in the chart for eight people in each quarter over the life of the duplex, the cost per unit would be substantially different. We are looking for stability and this chart does not take that into account. This chart is meaningful if used for nightly motel rooms for emergency housing, or for monthly rent in public housing. Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 6 of 10 -C- mitsLCDBG Pasco/5- 2_8 99d)z — - - -- - - - - - - - - - Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income All Number of clients below 50% median income NA Number of clients below 80% median income NA Number of elderly clients Possibly a grandparent Number of minority clients 4 (estimate) Number of disabled clients 1 (estimate) Total Pasco residents served Expected s at a time 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? EFH has been successfully operating a duplex in Richland obtained with CDBG funds in August 2009. The original amount designated was $94,000 but was increased to $136,577 at the time of acquisition. The property cost $155,000 and former owner is carrying a deed of trust for the balance. All payments have been made timely. All reports have been submitted timely. 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick 0 0 0 0 Richland 0 136,577 0 0 Pasco 0 0 0 0 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? EFH uses a number of factors to measure success: 1. Physically, success can be measured in units occupied times numbers of special needs or formerly homeless occupants. However, the following measurements are equally, if not more important: 2. School stability and attendance by the children. 3. Participation in our circle of support. 4. Maintaining healthy drug and alcohol free lifestyle, monitored by drug testing. 5. Participation in counseling, 12 Step and recovery programs. 6. Employment and wage increases. 7. Sliding scale increases in rent share as income increases. 8. Job training or school attendance. 9. Moving on to independent living. EFH keeps track of the reasons for leaving the program. These have included moving to another city to attend college, getting married and no longer needing our support, obtaining public housing, and being asked to leave because of drug relapse and therefore no longer qualifying for EFH. All of our current clients have been stable throughout the school year. Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 7 of 10 Gra�tsl GIIB��ascol S��s9/k� - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (809/o is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. All of our current clients are in the 30% HUD income guidelines. We expect that to be the case for all tenants who enter our housing units. 2004 HUD income Limit Guidelines for iZennev�ick Pasco - Richland -; 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $197450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $227700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $373600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $602150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $453400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $707000 $75,200 $80,400 $857500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other -TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Salaries 0 0 0 0 OPERATIONS: 0 Rent/Lease 0 Utilities 0 Supplies 0 CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials $ 307000 ** 103000** Grants from $60,000 ** Labor/Contracts banks,other 10,000 ** 10,000 in kind EFH/ Partners PROPERTY: Purchase Price 120,000** 103000** Seller/bank 1327000 ** Closing Costs 21000** mortgage OTHER: HUD required 201000** 207000 ** moving and relocation costs TOTAL $ 182,000 $30,000 $212,000 ** We anticipate the total cost of the project to be as listed in this table. However, the breakdown between purchase price and rehabilitation cost will be dependent on the property purchased In addition, the moving and relocation costs are dependent on whether there is a current tenant in the house when we purchase it and what costs they will require. $20,000 is the amount Richland held out of our 2008 grant to pay those costs. Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 8 of 10 -- - - -- _ - -Gx=tsJ-CDBG -Pwc-a/5_2&-QWbz- - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - - Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: No, but see the answers questions 4 and 15. 14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? EFH expects to move forward with the project by reevaluating the affordability of the project and perhaps selecting another alternative. We would likely need to receive 80% of the requested funds to proceed and we would expect to carry a privately funded mortgage. EFH is conservative with recurring costs because any payments to others decrease the amount we are able to spend on our families. 15 . if your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) These funds will not be used for recurring operational costs, but they will enable us to leverage funds for other grants. For instance, the Washington Families Fund grants ten years of case management for each unit, with an eligibility base of four units. Owning a duplex in Pasco in addition to the one in Richland will make us eligible to apply for Washington Families Fund. EFH will also apply for Benton County 2060 funds as soon as they become available. Our history of obtaining other grants is understandably important to future grantors. Many other grants require matching funds and allow a modicum of operational costs. We have received grants from Benton-Frankhn/Burbank Community Public Health and Safety Network, Bank of America, Sterling Savings and Loan, Knights of Columbus, Operation Rice Bowl, Diocese of Yakima, AARP Foundation Senior Employment Program, Executive Service Corps, Bechtel Hanford Inc., Richland Rotary, Columbia Center Rotary, Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities and Three Rivers Community Foundation. EFH also has worked with Safe Harbor Crisis Nursery. We have a good relationship with these and other organizations and will continue to work with these groups and others to leverage our projects. EFH receives donations regularly from over one hundred private donors. We also receive matching funds from employers and United Way designations, named by our private donors. EFH is holding a fund-raising barbecue this summer. EFH depends a lot on volunteers. We are fiscally conservative with overhead expenditures because we want to maximize the amounts we spend on rent subsidies. We operate mainly as a volunteer organization. Our administrators and officers are all volunteers and we are registered with the Volunteer Center. We report over an average of over 200 volunteer hours per month. Our only paid staff works part time at clerical and administrative assistance. LeMaster Daniels CPA firm provides two offices at greatly reduced rent. We have a crew of volunteers who maintain our Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 9 of 10 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 properties and others who work directly with our tenants. Other volunteers develop programs through our operations committee. 16. Check"yes"or"no"for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the sub recipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the sub recipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® El b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the sub recipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business?Maybe ❑ relocation of tenant 6. Does your project involve construction/renovation?Perhaps,depends on ® ❑ property a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure/housing/facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached,understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary right to the ideas,writings,items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Signature of Authoriz Agency Official Printed Name Title Date Elijah Family Homes CDBG Application 2010 Application: Page 10 of 10 _ ___ __GrantsJCDRCPa�ico/5_28_09/bz 505 Swift Boulevard, P.O. Box 190 Richland, WA 99352 Richland Telephone 509-942-7390, Fax 509-9415666 www.cimchland.wa.us May 29, 2009 Angie Pitman and City of Pasco Planning Commission City of Pasco P.O. Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 RE: Elijah Family Homes Dear Angie and Planning Commission: This letter is written in support of Elijah Family Homes application to the City of Pasco for 2010 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to provide affordable rental housing opportunities to at-risk families. The housing program offered by Elijah Family Homes assists the entire Tri-Cities Community, and is consistent with the goals and strategies identified in the Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan. Elijah Family Homes received $136,577 of 2008 CDBG funds from the City of Richland that was used to purchase a duplex. The duplex serves to provide affordable transitional rental housing for families below 50 percent of median income who have been rejected for public housing or conventional market housing, typically due to negative legal/ credit history and substance abuse history. Targeted clients are families who are currently homeless or are living in inadequate housing. An eligibility requirement is that the tenant (s) must not have used illegal drugs or alcohol for one year or more. Random drug tests ensure participants remain clean and sober, and a mentoring/case management system assists the family in breaking the cycle of poverty and negative lifestyle. Although Elijah Family Homes is a small, relatively new, non-profit organization run. primarily by volunteers, our experience with them in the application, contract and follow up process has been positive. Elijah Family Homes volunteers appear to be committed to learning and following CDBG Program requirements to assure a mutually agreeable outcome. Since the purchase in August 2008 , Elijah Family Homes has removed overgrown vegetation and replaced an old deteriorated fence, completed minor interior improvements, and installed an egress window in the basement of one unit. Both units are currently occupied, with the family contributing towards their rent on a sliding scale based on household income. Sincerely, Deborah F. Bluher CDBG/HOME Administrator City of Richland 6 . Letters of Support : a ) City of Richland : Bluher BENTON _ FRANKLIN Community Action =_ Committee May 26 , 2009 Community Services Block Grant Angie Pitman , Manager City of Pasco 525 N 3`d Ave Pasco , WA 99301 Dear Ms . Pitman : am writing to express my support for the Elijah- Family Homes :( EFH) proposal for the Pasco Community Services Block Grant Program . I have worked with staff of Elijah Family Homes for over six years and am pleased with the partnership and professionalism they bring to the table . Over those years , Elijah Family Homes has been an active member on the Benton Franklin Housing Continuum of Care Taskforce helping to provide affordable housing for the homeless and those at- risk of homelessness . The housing EFH provides and that which they project to provide meets objective three ( 3) , " Reduce the number of homeless families" ; from the Benton Franklin Ten-Year Plan to reduce homelessness by 50% by 2015 . Their project also assists in filling some of the major gaps in our system by providing case management and rental assistance for families with children and participates in the Homeless Management Information System. ( HMIS) . I look forward to a continued partnership with additional affordable housing becoming available . Sincerely , Judith A . Gidley, Executive Director 720 W. Court St . • Pasco, Washington 99301 • (509) 545-4042 • Fax (509) 544-9691 I cttcrc of Ciinnnrt • hl Mnntnn Frnnwin rAr • rirllcv Caro[Latorre, LICSWt CUP 301 SpertgkrSt. 4Ucf&1u Wa. 99354 (509) 3 75-31 04 May 24, 2009 To Whom It May Concern: I have been working with Elijah Family Homes (EFH) as a contract therapist since December 2008 . It has been a great privilege to become acquainted with the structure, programs, operations,-and dedicated staff of this faith based -organization. Clients served by EFH have substance abuse histories, many of the children are or have been in State dependencies, and completed educational levels among the clients are very low. Therefore, clients' rental and credit histories are a formidable hindrance to the goal of securing a safe and stable home. These people served do not qualify for public housing. Only with the first step of living in appropriate homes can the families begin to move forward with creating a more pro. social, integrated life style. EFH, through their rent assistance and housing programs, supplies this critical foundation. Further, EFH recognizes and addresses a number of the factors that are essential in breaking the often generational patterns of dysfunctional families . The emphasis is on enhancement of parenting skills, positive parent/child interaction, and opportunities for practicing social skills. To this end, there is a high level of accountability, and both recreational and educational activities are offered. Therapy, case management and mentoring are available. EFH is predominantly a volunteer organization directed by a Board of committed persons with a range of professional expertise. The level of commitment and cooperation throughout the organization is remarkable. The meticulous research and planning with which they approach program development and implementation has led to their current success. EFH has a vision. The vision has become operational. As a result, EFH is not only positively influencing individual lives, but it is also contributing significantly to the health and wellness of our communities. Carol Latorre, LICSW, CDP 6. Letters of Support : c) Counselor: Latorre 1105 Putnam St. Richland , WA 99354 pstrfaster(cDhotmail . com May 26 , 2009 Ms . Barbara Puigh Elijah Family Homes 8131 W. Grandridge Kennewick, WA 99336 Dear Ms. Puigh, I am writing in support of the application Elijah Family Homes (EFH) will be making to the City of Pasco. I understand that EFH intends to apply for block grant funds to purchase property in Pasco that will be used for housing for qualified low income families. Elijah Family Homes purchased a duplex across the street from my house late last year. EFH did a fine job of preparing the property for the new residents. The house-was-painted-end-an- old-fence=has been- replaced, -work was also- done inside the house. Two families have moved into that home. I could not wish for better neighbors. They have kept the yard in good condition . They are quiet and consider of other neighbors . Both families have small children which they supervise responsibly. They have spoken with me about their desire to be responsible renters and neighbors. In my opinion the second chance afforded to them has been great benefit to them personally and to our neighborhood. I am proud to call them neighbors. What I have learned about EFH leads me to conclude this is not an isolated anomaly. Other positive examples can be found in other properties used by EFH . I believe it would be a worthwhile investment of public funds for Pasco to give favorable consideration of your application. I fully support the mission of EFH , and I have no reservation about endorsing this. application . Sincerely, , C�V." Richard Nordgren b . Letters of support : d ) Richland Resident : Nordgren 0% RECEIVED JUN 0 1 2009 Helping One family at a Time COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Angie Pitman, CDBG Administrator June 1, 2009 City of Pasco Planning Commission PO Box 293 Pasco, WA 99301 Dear Ms. Pitman and Planning Commission Members: Elijah Family Homes (EFH) is a nondenominational, faith-based organization that has been operating in the Tri-Cities since May 2005. EFH's mission is to strengthen the community by helping families establish safe and stable homes and improve family living. Our work is to provide rent subsidies and offer supportive services for families with low income who do not qualify for public housing. Although Elijah Family Homes is faith-based, recipients are not required to hold any particular religious beliefs nor to participate in any religious services. The first EFH client was a single woman, with six children, living in a two-bedroom picker's cabin in an orchard. She could not find adequate housing for her family because she was poor and had a felony conviction related to illegal drugs. Elijah Family Homes is currently assisting eight families with 27 children in Kennewick and Richland. This grant would allow us to expand our service area to Pasco for two households each year. We are asking for $182,000, out of a total projected cost of$212,000, to purchase and renovate (if needed) a three-bedroom duplex or other appropriate property in Pasco to provide long-term housing for two families who have barriers to obtaining other housing assistance. These funds will also allow our program to grow, as we can leverage these funds to obtain additional grants. Leveraging funds would help EFH move from a volunteer organization to one with staff who can better serve clients. Elijah Family Homes is an active part of a supportive community network helping families in need break the cycle of poverty and substance abuse and achieve self-sufficiency. EFH has good experience partnering with other organizations. Together, with your help, EFH can increase our efforts to reduce homelessness in our area. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Sincerely yours, Barbara Puigh, President 8131 W.Grandridge Blvd elijahfamilyhomes @clearwire.net P.O.Box 3027 Kennewick,WA 99336 http://elijahfamilyhomes.co.nr Richland, WA 99354 (509)783-7077 501(c)(3)non-profit corporation Fax(509)735-0730 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2030 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant Jericho Road Ministries RECEIVED Address 2500 Jericho Rd. Richland,WA 11 IN. n 9 2009 Project Name HavenSafe ENT Contact Person Amy Schultz,Executive Director '°- Telephone 509-627-0750 Fax Federal Tax ID Number 20-3213204 CDBG Funds Requested 288,000.00 Match 72,000.00 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. HavenSafe is temporary,full-time,transitional housing serving women and children experiencing family violence,located in West Pasco. CDBG funds will be used to provide funding for land,building,furnishings, appliances and landscaping. This will provide a safe and secure facility for victims of family violence. Currently,services only exist for intimate partner domestic violence victims.No bed space is available for boys age 13-18 nor is there adequate bed space to meet community need. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual information. In 2008,Pasco Police Dept.responded to over 1,100 domestic related calls within the city limits. This showed an increase of just over 200 calls from the previous year,demonstrating a growing need. Domestic Violence Services of Benton/Franklin Counties report of the 146 adults to have received shelter through November of 2008,prior community data was collected from 128. There were 43 that identified Pasco or Franklin County as their previous location.DVS screens victims based on qualifications.The primary screen out is the violence occurred with an intimate domestic partner. For July through November,2008,there were 40 households declining or not qualifying for shelter services. Eleven of those households included children. Victims are reluctant to leave their community,uprooting their children during an already disruptive situation. Research tells us maintaining victims within their own environment, 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 schools, churches, etc. decreases trauma and increases healing/empowerment processes . I Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 5 Strategy # 1 Objective # 1 Outcome # 1 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority X C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: HavenSafe provides social services and basic needs to address family violence issues in a targeted population with critical need. 5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) a. X You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # Block Groups # C. X Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons X Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV X Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. X Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. *Public Service/Housing- unit of measure is people * Homebuyer- Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation- Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development - Unit of measure is FfE jobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1" Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 35 Persons served 415.00 147525.00 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 4` Quarter 35 Persons served 415.00 14,525.00 TOTAL 70 S . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income Number of clients below 50% median income 30 Number of clients below 80% median income 33 Number of elderly clients 1 Number of minority clients 43 Number of disabled clients 1 Total Pasco residents served 70 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick NA NA NA NA Richland NA NA NA NA Pasco NA NA NA NA 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? HavenSafe will provide an additional 15 bed spaces for persons experiencing domestic violence. The unique service is the acceptance of persons who are not intimate partners in this role as victims, such as adult children living in their parents home. Currently, there is no place for mothers to bring their male children ages 13-17. Male dependents, age 1347 will be accepted into the shelter on a case by case basis if their mother is seeking shelter. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (8011/o is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. `'2009 .HUD income Limit Guidelines for:Kenriewiek - Pasco Richland . ... , , , 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $197450 $21,000 $22,550 $247100 $257650 50% $22770.0 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $407200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $419500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $647300 $68,450 Median $457400 $517800 $587300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Source of Other Funds Other Funds Funds TOTAL BUDGET PERSONNEL: 34,000.00 Community 341000.00 Salaries fundraising and ants OPERATIONS: 38,00600 Community 38,000.00 Rent/Lease fundraising and Utilities other grants Supplies CONSTRUCTION: 200,000.00 2007000.00 Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: 70,000.00 70,000.00 Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: 81000.00 181000.00 Landscaping 87000.00 Furnishings Artistic 27000.00 enhancements TOTAL 288,000. 00 360,000.00 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Project schedule is just beginning. Other funds not secured as yet. Fundraising efforts are underway that will provide additional funds, donated materials and services. In-Kind services and materials will provide much of the additional costs as acquired. Specifically, a donation of land and building services is being solicited from builders and service clubs Requested Grant amount may be smaller if land is donated. Materials and other services will be solicited once property is secured. Grants from service clubs and funding from local churches will provide the bulk of operating costs and salaries to run the project. Secured In-Kind includes: engineering and design services from Don Pratt, Translation services of materials and advertisements into Spanish, Printing services from local churches. Social services support from Pasco DVR and current social service agencies. 8 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? Continue to solicit donation of land and services from the building community such as Home Builders Association and Carpenter's Union, Pasco Bulldog House, etc. If funding is not secured, delay in building will occur. The project will continue to move forward as supplies and services are provided. Jericho Road Ministries will continue to build their outreach services to domestic violence victims that do not meet the normal requirements of intimate partner language to provide goods and services that will help clients find safety and goods that will provide for their basic needs. 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Furnishing the house will require an initial investment of 8,000.00 for furniture and appliances. Landscaping and art enhancements will be maintained with volunteers and the residents of the home as needed. Charitable groups will be used to `adopt a room' as needs arise and provide furnishings and goods. Service clubs will provide for updates of landscaping and other incidental items. 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? X ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? X ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑ X b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ X 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ X 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ X 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? X ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ X b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? X ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition X d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑ 9 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Z , &Cfc� 6711 io Signatyfe 6f Authorize nc Official Printed Name & Title Date Community Development Block Grant Application 2010 CDBG Program Year Public Service Special Attachment #1 Complete this page if you are proposing to provide a "Public Service" 1. When was your agency organized / formed? March 14, 2006 2. Is your agency a Washington State non-profit corporation and/or a faith based Yes X No E]organization? 3. Does your agency have federal IRS non-profit status? Yes X No ❑ 4. List any required accreditation your agency / staff must have in order to do business: 501-c-3 IRS status for agency. Social Service experience and 2 years education in business, psychology or social services for staff. Washington State background clearance. 10 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 S. To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this purpose? Application in process to Seroptimist International of Pasco-Kennewick 6. Will CDBG assist in leveraging or matching other funding? Yes No X 7. Is this the first year for the program? Yes X No ❑ a. Year began: 2010 8. If you receive funding for 2010, how will your program be funded in the future? Grant writing will be ongoing. Local churches, Service clubs and fundraisers will provide the core funding for the project. 9. If you received CDBG funding in 2009, please quantify the increase in service that you will provide during 2010 and explain why there is a new demand or an unmet need in the community for this service. 11 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application 2010 CDBG Program Year Economic Development Special Attachment #2 Complete this page if you are proposing to provide an "Economic Development" project 1. Please list the DUNS Number of your business: 29350 g J 2. This is a: X non-profit ❑ for-profit X faith-based 3. Describe how your project will make the most effective use of CDBG funds? HavenSafe will provide temporary, full-time, transitional housing serving women and children experiencing family violence, located in West Pasco. CDBG funds will be used to provide funding for land, building, furnishings, appliances and landscaping. This will provide a safe and secure facility for victims of family violence. Currently, services only exist for intimate partner domestic violence victims. No bed space is available for boys age 13-18 nor is there adequate bed space to meet community need. 4. Is there leverage of other funds? In-Kind support will provide materials and services that total over 20,000.00 to our clients. Other funding will include income from the faith-community, Local service clubs such as Soroptimist International and Rotary and fundraising events such as an Art/jewelry Auction and Dinner. 5. How will you assure that CDBG funds are not substituted for other non-federal investment? Use of Quick Books designating income and expenses are carefully categorized into appropriate line items. Careful record keeping will designate and track income and expenses. 6. Can you demonstrate that your project will meet the minimum federal CDBG threshold of providing one full time equivalency job (32 hours per week) per $35,000 of CDBG funds, or provide goods or services to residents of a low-moderate income (LMI) area, such that the number of LMI persons residing in the area served amounts to at least one LMI person per $350 of CDBG investment, and that at least more than one half (51%) of the total jobs created will be filled by very low, low and moderate-income persons? How will you make sure that the jobs will be made available to very low, low and moderate-income persons? One FTE position will be filled by an AmeriCorps Vista Member who will be selected from the geographic area we serve. According to OSPI 62% of Pasco School students are on free or reduced lunches. The area supports hiring of low income persons. Use of employement programs such as WorkSource and Goodwill will offer a low income employee pool from which to select employees. 12 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Our clientele target area according to US Census data summary file, #3, is anywhere from 34.2% to 66. 8% under income depending on situational living conditions. At least 60% of our clientele will be under income. This will be determined by entrance interview data collected. 7. Is your request being used for business incentives or for recruitment of a business from another city or state? If yes, describe in detail. Are the proposed jobs existing positions or are they new? No. 8. Show the number of new permanent jobs projected to be created (seasonal jobs do not count): Job Title # l~TE Jobs Created # Part Time Jobs'# FTE Jobs Filled # Part Time Jobs Created , b Lhr1l `. Filled by LMI House Director 1 Relief House 1 1 Director AmeriCorps Vista 1 1 ** LMI jobs refer to anyjoh that can be held by a person with no advanced training or education beyond high school - or a job that the business agrees to hire unquabTied persons for and provide training. 13 Map of Pasco;WA by MapQuest2fPas. �,���V by MapQts Page 2 of 2 MA ' tE3 o 2400 ft 1 ,€ N .unit Trt :i E ant Rd Rd 3 yy 3 �d f. .,. .. " �w cog!t 3t; `Z IM as West V ti w 2009 Tt:Q: Tcta..AiJas MaPouest inn. All rights reserved.Use subject to License/Copyright Map Legend Directions and maps are informational only.We make no warranties on the accuracy of their content,road conditions or route usability or expeditiousness.You assume all risk of use.MapQuest and its suppliers shall not be liable to you for any loss or delay resulting from your use of MapQuest.Your use of MapQuest means you agree to our Terms of Use http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Pasco&state=WA&zipcode=99301&country=US&la... 6/1/2009 Pasco CDBG Application Form 20 10 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant Boys &t Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties RECEIVED Address 801 N. 18th Avenue,Pasco,WA 99301 Project Name Boys &t Girls Club Targeted Outreach Efforts -Design PhAyN 0 1 2009 Contact Person Ron McHenry COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Telephone 509-543-9980 Fax 509-543-9981 Federal Tax ID Number 91-1673327 CDBG Funds Requested $17,500.00 Match $9,300.00 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. The project will provide the Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties with the necessary architectural design and review to begin expansion efforts at the Public Facility located at 801 N. 18th Avenue. Through a Targeted Needs Assessment it has been determined that youth in our community in grades 6-8 are underserved by current youth service programs. The current facility does not have the space available for serving this population or the necessary infrastructure to provide a safe environment for all children. Youth targeted for service fall in the age range of 11-14 and are most susceptible to negative influences from peers. This is also a time when their peers become involved in activities which may include violent actions. Funding from the Community Development Block Grant for 2010 will address this need by allowing the Boys & Girls Club to engage the services of an Architect to provide direction on site plan elevation and structure and better prepare the organization for a correct assessment in estimating building cost. The building envisioned will be placed in the back cement area directly outside the gymnasium and consist of a simple stand-alone structure of 2,500-3,000 square feet. This building will be dedicated to providing services to youth in grades 6-8 at a time in their lives where having a `place of their own' is important and they begin to establish the character traits which will affect their future lives. Because the current facility has a Gymnasium Art Room and Kitchen which can be repurposed during specific times during the week for exclusive use by the tween population the new outbuilding will be a simple open space with computer lab area, social recreation zone and learning center - providing on a daily basis the most important elements of Boys & Girls Club programs. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual information. The services that the Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties offer are specifically related to the strategic priorities adopted by the City of Pasco. The youth served in our program are predominantly from low-income households and would otherwise be unsupervised during, program hours Students attending the two schools closest to the Boys Pasco CDBG Application Form 201. 0 & Girls Club are some of the neediest in the community, with 89 . 7% and 94. 7% of students receiving free or reduced lunches . These youth will be more safely served educationally and recreationally through this project. Goal III, Strategy 1 addresses the improvement of community or neighborhood centers . Additionally, the work of the Boys & Girls Club and this project will address Goal V, Strategy 2 by providing services to children and youth homeless families and lower-income families. Currently there are 49 members who will be ineligible to attend the Main Branch in 2009- 2010 . Services for youth in grades 6-8 are available at the Teen Center at 333 W. Court Street, however, many of these members are from the neighborhood directly adjacent to the Main Branch and will not travel to programs, even with the semi-close proximity. Additionally, many of these youth are often intimidated by even the thought of attending a program with others so much older than them. On average, 40 youth ` age-out ' of the Main Branch facility annually. In 2008 -2009 only 3 continued attending Boys & Girls Club programs by transitioning to the Teen Center. When the project is fully realized over the course of the next 2-4 years with the construction of the ` Tween Center' , we anticipate being able to retain 80% of participants from the Main Branch, growing the ` Tween Center' population to an average of 80 youth a dU in just three years. By having a separate facility where more age=appropriate activities can take place and staff who are able to focus on the special needs of an adolescent population transitioning to their teen years we will have the capability to more effectively serve the youth in our community who need us most. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # III Strategy # 1 Objective # I Outcome # 1 4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: This project will result in design elements which will assist in the increase of space available to persons in a public facility. 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. *Public Service I Housing - Unit of measure is people * Homebuycr - Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development - Unit of measure is FIEjobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1" Quarter 0 No Work No Work No Work 2"d Quarter 0 No Work No Work No Work 3rd Quarter 480 Youth Served $36.46 $17,500.00 4th Quarter 0 Youth Served No Work $17,500.00 TOTAL 480 Youth Served - $17,500.00 S. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income 221 Number of clients below 50% median income 249 Number of clients below 80% median income 10 Number of elderly clients 0 Number of minority clients 456 Number of disabled clients 3 Total Pasco residents served 480 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick $106,813.04 Richland Pasco $203,000 $157,166.25 $93,000 $34,956 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? The groundwork will be laid to increase the capacity of the Boys & Girls Club, provide a safer environment for current members and age appropriate programs for an underserved youth population. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (800/o is the maximum eligible) . These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 300/o $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $227550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 800/0 $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $647300 $68,450 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $645800 $70,000 $757200 $80,400 $ 85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will Pasco CDBG Application Form 201. 0 use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: $1,800.00 BGCBFC $1,800.00 Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering $17,500.00 $17,500.00 Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: $7,500.00 Architect $7,500.00 (Describe) In-Kind TOTAL $17,500 $9,300 $26,800.00 13 . Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: The funding from the Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties has already been included in the fiscal budget and includes personnel for managing the project. Through the course of interviewing architects we have found that they are amenable to potentially working at cost, providing in-kind assistance to lower the cost of the project. 14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? Complete the project to extent practical based on funds received. 15 . If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc. , what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) No CDBG funds will be used for this purpose. 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4 . Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6 . Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) Pasco CDBG Application Form 201. 0 a. Public Service F-1 b. Economic Development c. Acquisition d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract (s) . The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Ron McHenry, VP of Finance 05-29-2009 S�ignaFuR of Authorized Ag cy Official Printed Name & Title Date Court St. 395 201 ' St. 18`" St, Boys & Girls Club Edgar Brown Stadium Sylvester Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant Boys &Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties Address 801 N. 181h Avenue,Pasco,WA 99301 Project Name Design and Technology Infrastructure EnhancemeRIVED Advance of Facility Expansion JUN 0 1 2009 Contact Person Ron McHenry MMuu Telephone 509-543-9980 Fax 50 Y3NA§f'ONOM{C DEVELOPMENT Federal Tax ID Number 91-1673327 CDBG Funds Requested $55,000 Match $17,463 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. The Boys & Girls Clubs Main Branch facility is located within an old elementary school building, originally constructed in 1954 Through a Targeted Needs Assessment it has been determined that youth in our community in grades 6-8 are underserved by current youth service programs The current facility does not have the space available for serving this population or the necessary infrastructure to provide a safe environment for all children. Youth targeted for service fall in the age range of 11-14 and are most susceptible to negative influences from peers This is also a time when their peers become involved in activities which may include violent actions. Funding from the Community Development Block Grant for 2010 will address this need two ways To prepare for the inclusion of older youth in our current program model, as well as react to an increase of arrests in our immediate neighborhood which have involved significant wegpons each program area in the facility will be equipped with an LCD monitor and camera The camera will allow for a staff member who is centrally located to assist in monitoring situations developing in n any space and the monitors will be used to communicate in the event of a lockdown Additionally the system will allow any staff member including those housed in the administrative section to use a key-combination on their terminals to initiate a pre determined lockdown procedure at any time. With potential expansion to the facility occurring which will not involve direct access to the interior of the building it t important that each area of the Boys & Girls Club campus has the ability to communicate efficiently in an emergency. Currently there is no working exterior lighting for the building with the exception of the south facing side This presents safety issues during the late fall winter and early spring, as large trees in the neighborhood block out what small amount of natural light there is. Additionally, during the summer months there is a significant increase in graffiti and other forms of vandalism which result in damage to the facility. Funding will be utilized to provide additional light fixtures that illuminate the front west facing side of the building to ensure safe circumstances for youth and parents traveling to and from the Club and on the North and East sides where no lighting is currently present. Pasco CDBG Application Form 010 IMIMM 1011 2 . Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. The services that the Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties offer are specifically related to the strategic priorities adopted by the City of Pasco The youth served in our program are predominantly from low-income households and would otherwise be unsupervised during_program hours Students attending the two schools closest to the Boys & Girls Club are some of the neediest in the community, with 89 .7% and 94 . 7% of students receiving free or reduced lunches These youth will be more safely served educationally and recreational) t� hrough this project Goal III Strategy 1 addresses the improvement of community or neighborhood centers Additionally, the work of the Boys & Girls Club and this project will address Goal V Strategy 2 by providing services to children and youth, homeless families and lower-income families . Currently there are 49 members who will be ineligible to attend the Main Branch in 2009- 2010. Services for youth in grades 6-8 are available at the Teen Center at 333 W. Court Street however, many of these members are from the neighborhood directly adjacent to the Main Branch and will not travel to programs even with the semi-close proximity Additionally, many of these youth are often intimidated by even the thought of attending a program with others so much older than them On average 40 youth ` age-out' of the Main Branch facility annually. In 200_8-2009 only 3 continued attending Boys & Girls Club programs by transitioning to the Teen Center. When the project is fully realized over the course of the next 2-4 years with the construction of the ` Tween Center' we anticipate being able to retain 80% of participants from the Main Branch growing the ` Tween Center' population to an average of 80 youth a day in lust three years By having a separate facility where more age-appropriate activities can take place and staff who are able to focus on the special needs of an adolescent population transitionmg to their teen years we will have the capability to more effectively serve the youth in our community who need us most. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # III Strategy # I Objective # I Outcome # I 4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: This project will result in an improvement to a public facility. 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers I ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public Scrvice I Housing — Unit of mcasurc is people * Homebuyer — Un it of measure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of mcasurc is houses * Economic Development — unit of mcasurc is FTE jobs andIor businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost I" Quarter 0 No Work No Work No Work tad Quarter 0 No Work No Work No Work 3`d Quarter 180 Youth Served $114.58 $20,624.40 4`h Quarter 300 Youth Served $114.58 $347375.60 TOTAL 480 Youth Served - $55,000.00 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income 221 Number of clients below 50% median income 249 Number of clients below 800/o median income 10 Number of elderly clients 0 Number of minority clients 456 Number of disabled clients 3 Total Pasco residents served 480 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick $106,813.04 Richland Pasco $203,000 $157,166.25 $93,000 $34,956 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? The groundwork will be laid to increase the capacity of the Boys & Girls Club, provide a safer environment for current members and age appropriate programs for an underserved youth population. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (800/o is the maximum eligible) . These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 R 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $ 80,400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Requested CDBG Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Expense Funds Other Funds Funds PERSONNEL: $12,463 BGCBFC $12,463 Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials $52,000 $5 ,000 000 Labor/Contracts $3,000 $3, PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: $5,000 Sharefest $5,000 (Describe) Sharefest In-Kind TOTAL $55,000 $17,463 $72,463 13 . Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: The funding from the Boys Est Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties has already been included in the fiscal budget and includes personnel for managing the project and installing the requisite hardware, peripheral devices and wiring upgrades necessary for completion of this project. 14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? Complete the project to extent practical based on funds received. 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization) No CDBG funds will be used for this purpose. 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? El 4 . Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ LnJ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) El a. Public Service b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: Ron McHenry, VP of Finance 05-29-2009 Date Allomparuthorized Agency Official Printed Name &z Title Court St. 395 20t" St 18t" St Boys & Girls Club Edgar Brown Stadium Sylvester { l' Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application — 2010 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco—Administrative and Community Services Address PO Box 293,Pasco,WA 99301 R�G�� E® Project Name Lucas Park Playground MAY 2 9 20 Contact Person Dan Dotta,Facilities Manager COMMLIN49€CONOW DEVEWPMENr Telephone (509)543-5757 Fax (509)543-5758 Federal Tax ID Number CDBG Funds Requested $60,000 Match 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. Replace the outdated playground equipment at Lucas Park.This project will serve the local neighborhood that is low to moderate income families. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual information. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs(Attachment B)—what Goal,Strategy,Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal# III Strategy# 2 Objective# 1-SLE Outcome# 1-Avail. 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A) (Check only one box) A.High Priority ® B.Average Priority ❑ C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: In FY-2010, the CDBG program spent $60,000 on installation of playground equipment in Lucas Park of a targeted area for the purpose of mailing a suitable living environment available for the citizens who live in the area 67.8 % of whom are low-t 5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box-a,b,c,d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract# 203 Block Groups# 3,4 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. *Public Service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost I" Quarter 1177 People $12.74 $15,000.00 2 Id Quarter 1177 People $12.74 $15,000.00 3rdQuarter 1177 People $12.74 $15,000.00 4t Quarter 1177 People $12.74 $15,000.00 TOTAL 4709 $12.74 $601000.00 8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income 1125 Number of clients below 50% median income 788 Number of clients below 80% median income 1283 Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of disabled clients Total Pasco residents served 4709 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco $100,000 $213,276 $40,000 $115,000 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? This will give the neighborhood children a safer place to play. There will be more activity in the park. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 1 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 1 $70,000 $75,200 $805400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: $605000 $60,000 Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL $60,000 $60,000 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: 14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? Leave the existing play equipment in place. 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) Maintenance will not be paid by CDBG. 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ® ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ® ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? ® ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. at type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: S` t�s tri F/�t , � rlr5 a� .aeriz Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name & Title Date 8 rs�,A c t u u�s h-$a t e e F 1W k" e �x RECEIVED Pasco CDBG Application Form 20 10 MAY 2 9 2009 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year COMMUNU&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Applicant City of Pasco-Department of Community&Economic Development Inspection Services Division Address 525 North 3rd Avenue,Pasco,WA 99301 Project Name Provide Inspection Services In Low and Moderate Income Ares of Pasco Contact Person Mitch Nickolds,CBO,Inspection Services Manager Telephone (509)545-3441 Fax (509) 545-3499 Federal Tax ID Number n/a CDBG Funds Requested $48,000 Match $ 17,025 1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. Blight conditions,property nuisances and fire hazards in homes and upon properties owned and/or occupied by low to moderate income families and lack of education of minimum housing and property maintenance standards for low to moderate income households. Property and housing conditions in older neighborhoods will continue to decline without constant code enforcement and education efforts. 2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual information. Mitigation of blighted/substandard housing conditions,property nuisances and fire hazards and property maintenance and blight elimination education of residents of low to moderate income areas. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs(Attachment B)-what Goal,Strategy,Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal# V Strategy# 2 Objective# I Outcome# 3 4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A) (Check only one box) A.High Priority ® B.Average Priority ❑ C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Mitigation of blight conditions, property nuisances and fire hazards in homes and properties located in the affected census districts. 5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box-a,b,c,d) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 201.0 201-All 100-600 202- All 100-300 203-ALL 100400 Census Tract # 20L 202, 203, 204 Block Groups # 204 ALL 100-600 C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees. 6. Provide a map showing the location of the project or service area. 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form €x :1 (1 CODE ENFORCEMENT CENSUS BLOCK %LOW/MODERATE TRACT GROUP INCOME PERSONS 201 ALL 7496 700 6&8 30 0.5 400 778 500 81.2 600 778 202 ALL 75.0 100 861 f' x 3000 0 M9 F � s 203 ALL 62:8 d r�1 100 769 r 200 12.4 " 300 75.0 203 �� e 400 460 204 ALL 698 100 823 300 8&4 400 78.0 � 564 26 1 . tea r �r CO, t�4 41 s F 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public Service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households * Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FIE jobs and/or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 1" Quarter 125 Houses $96.00 $12,000 2nd Quarter 125 Houses $96.00 $12,000 3` Quarter 125 Houses $96.00 $12,000 4` Quarter 125 Houses $96,00 $12,000 TOTAL 500 Houses 1 $96.00 1 $48,000 8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income 245444 Number of clients below 50% median income 77034 Number of clients below 80% median income 101244 Number of elderly clients 11998 Number of minority clients 169731 Number of disabled clients Unknown Total Pasco residents served 24,444 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco $48,000 $48,000 $48,000 $48,000 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? The impact of code enforcement and blight abatement activities will be the reduction of 125 blighted properties each quarter in the affected census districts. The success of the abatement activity on each affected property will be verified by code enforcement officers with photographs and a file of the case documentation will be maintained in the City's Inspection Services Division. 8 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible) . These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009IHUT? incaiue" Limit Guidelines fur.,Kennewicic =P sc;4 - Ricl and. 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 p p p p People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $195450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $469650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450 Median $45,400 1 $51,800 $58,300 1 $64,800 1 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500 12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: 487000 17,025 LOCAL 65,025 Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL 1 48,000 177025 1 LOCAL 65,025 13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Yes. The other funds will be paid from the City's general fund. 14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? Nuisance conditions in census tract properties occupied by low-to-moderate income families will remain unabated and the neighborhoods will continue to deteriorate and fewer persons will be served. 9 Pasco CDBG Application Form 1 20 1 1) 15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time,supplies,etc.,what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) 16. Check"yes"or"no"for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction/renovation? ❑ a. Do you own the property? ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure/housing/facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s). The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas,writings,items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: ��o,� uG / y - Z Sig ture o T Authorized Agency Official Printed Name Est Title Date 10 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year Applicant City of Pasco-Public Works Address (21.201) Parts of Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Project Name Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Improvements - Phase Il(CT201BG4) Contact Person Michael McShane - City Engineer Telephone 545-3444 Fax Federal Tax ID Number CDBG Funds Requested $300,000 Match 1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed. CDBG funds are used to provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and roadway improvements in low- income neighborhood (Census Tract 201). 2 . Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual information. 3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and Outcome does your project fulfill? Goal # 11 Strategy # IL1 Objective # Suitable Outcome # Availabili Living ty/Accessi Environm bility ent 4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A) (Check only one box) A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑ Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Al - Bricks & Mortar Project resulting in visual physical improvements (engineering & architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project cost.) Reduce Barriers, Public Facilities, Neighborhood Revititalization 5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d) 5 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 LMA - 570.208(a)(1) a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data Census Tract # 201 Block Groups # C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box) ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees 6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. 7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success. * Public Scrvice / Housing - Unit o1 measure is pcopic * Homchw - Unit ol mcasurc is households * Rchabila at ion - Unit of mcasurc is houses * Economic Daiclopmcni - Unit o(measurc is FTEjobs and/ or businesses Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost 151 Quarter People 2" Quarter 3r Quarter 4" Quarter TOTAL S. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following criteria: Number of clients below 30% median income 11500 Number of clients below 50% median income 1,320 Number of clients below 80% median income 1,200 Number of elderly clients 236 Number of minority clients 11181 Number of disabled clients Unknown Total Pasco residents served 1,575 9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years? 2009 2008 2007 2006 Kennewick Richland Pasco $294,175 $138,750 $100,000 6 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success? In FY-2009, the CDBG program used $ 300,000 to install curb, gutter, sidewalks and improve roadway in low income neighborhood providing safe routes for neighborhood residents (Census Tract 201) . Persons in lower-income neighborhoods have improved quality of life as indicated by improvements to basic infrastructure. 11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs ( 80% is the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010. 2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick Pasco - Richland 1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People 30% $13,600 15550 $17,500 $191450 $21,000 $221550 $24,100 $251650 50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $321400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750 80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $647300 $68,450 Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $6400 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $851500 12 . Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds. Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET Funds Funds PERSONNEL: Salaries OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: $300,000 Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase Price Closing Costs OTHER: (Describe) TOTAL 13 . Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: 14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will you do? 7 Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010 The project will be delayed until funds are secured. 15 . If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.) N/A 16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions: Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑ b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ 3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ 5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ 6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑ a. Do you own the property? ® ❑ b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑ 7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) a. Public Service ❑ b. Economic Development ❑ c. Acquisition ❑ d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities Certifications and Assurances I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) . The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration. I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items or samples. SUBMITTED BY: MCS A Ali j� brl)' Si nature of Authorized Agency'Official Printed Name ass Title Date 8 S Y i Ad.t y ill � i7Y � Y 1 � .s 1� � P � ?d r t 365.3�' � � -• � �, ._; i t REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP09-004 APPLICANT: Gustavo Olivas HEARING DATE: 7/16/09 8205 W 10th Avenue ACTION DATE: 7/ 16/09 Kennewick, WA 99336 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of an auto body repair shop in a C-3 (General Business) zone. 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lots 1-4 Block 7, Helm's 1st Add. together with Lots 1-3 Block 6, Helm's 2nd Add. with the east 1/2 of the adjacent vacated alley. General Location: 1603 West Lewis Street Property Size: Approximately 0.317 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from 15th Avenue and West Lewis Street. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer lines are located in West Lewis Street. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: Surrounding zoning and land use is as follows: NORTH- C-1- two vacant lots and an office building SOUTH- C-3- auto repair auto detailing and auto sales EAST- C-3- auto body shop WEST- C-3- office and restaurant 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial development. Comprehensive Plan policy LU-4- B encourages concentration of commercial activities, which are functionally and economically beneficial. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a determination of nonsignificance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. ANALYSIS The property in question has been zoned C-3 for 30+ years and has been used for automotive services for many years. The most recent use of the property has been for auto detailing. The applicant proposes to expand the auto detailing service to include auto body work. Due to the hazardous and sometimes obnoxious nature of auto body shops they are permitted only in the industrial zones. Auto body shops may be permitted in C-3 zones after review through the special permit process. The C-3 zoning district permits more intensive land uses than those generally found in other commercial districts. For example automotive sales and service and heavy machinery sales and service are permitted uses in the C-3 zone. The general area around the proposed site at the corner of 15th Avenue and West Lewis Street is used predominately for automotive businesses. Within 400 feet of the site there are two car sales lots, a detail shop an automotive repair shop and an auto body shop. Auto body properties often become repositories for damaged car and truck parts. The site currently does not have a screen area in which parts and damaged vehicles can be screened from public view. Auto body shop can also produce fumes and odors that impact adjoining properties. The special permit process provides an opportunity to review proposed land uses to determine whether or not conditions can be applied to mitigate any possible negative impacts to surrounding uses. In the case of an auto body shop, sight screening, proper use of spray booths and ventilation equipment can all be used to lessen negative impacts to adjoining properties. FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned C-3. 2. Automobile sales and service is a permitted use in the C-3 zone. 3. Heavy machinery sales and service is a permitted use in the C-3 zone. 2 4. The site was previously used for automobile sales and service. 5. The site is located within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. 6. Per the Growth Management Act urban development is to be encouraged within Urban Growth Boundaries (CP.2.2 Policy 1. (B). 7. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for future commercial development. 8. The site is not a designated critical area. 9. An auto body shop is located directly east of the proposed site. 10. An Automotive repair shop, automotive detailing shop and two car sales lots are located nearby. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed site for commercial development. The Comprehensive Plan encourages urban development within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. The proposal involves the establishment of a commercial business. Comprehensive Plan policy LU-4-B encourages concentration of commercial activities, which are functionally and economically beneficial. The proposed use is functionally similar to other automotive related business located around the site. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed auto body shop will utilize existing infrastructure consistent with its intended use. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? No construction is proposed as part of this application. The existing character of the surrounding area is automotive in nature. All surrounding properties currently contain commercial businesses. 3 The proposed use will support and further the established character of the surrounding area. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? No exterior construction is proposed as part of this application. The existing structure is similar in height and shape to neighboring structures. Other nearby uses on Lewis Street consist of automotive shops and uses matching auto body repair. These existing uses have not discouraged development on other properties. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Nearby properties include uses identical or similar to the proposed auto body use. The proposed use will be operated in a manner similar to nearby businesses. A heavy machinery sales and service business, which is a permitted use in the C-3 zoning district, could generate more noise and vibrations than the proposed use. The operations of the proposed auto body shop will not be objectionable to surrounding automotive related businesses. However, by nature auto body shops can generate loud noises during normal business hours which may be disruptive to occupants of neighboring properties. Additionally, automotive paint spray booths equipped with the necessary filtration systems may produce fumes found to be objectionable by occupants of neighboring properties. By reason of fumes and noise this use may be more objectionable than retail businesses (i.e. book stores, cafe's or hotel/motels) also permitted in a C-3 zoning district. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The grinding, sanding, banging, welding, and painting of vehicles creates noise, fumes, vibrations and dust that can become nuisance to nearby dwelling units. The use of flammable materials associated with auto body shops and fumes from painting can create a safety concerns for nearby properties. These concerns are address by proper installation of a code required spray booth and ventilation system. 4 RECOMMENDATION* * Note: (Staff is recommending this application be completed in one meeting due to the application being delayed as the result of misfiling) MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions therefrom as contained in the July 16, 2009 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of fact and conclusions there from, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve a special for the location of an automotive body shop at 1603 West Lewis Street. 1) The special permit is personal to the applicant; 2) An International Building Code (IBC) approved spray booth, spray equipment and paint ventilation equipment must be installed in the building; 3) No painting, priming or grinding shall occur outside a building; 4) No outdoor frame straightening or other equipment is permitted; 5) No outdoor storage of parts or damaged vehicles shall be visible from West Lewis Street or surrounding properties. 6) Fencing meeting the following standards must be installed around all outdoor storage areas parallel with and no further south than the front of the building on Lewis Street. i. Outdoor storage and trash collection areas shall be completely screened from all adjacent properties and public rights-of-way; ii. Any barbed wire fencing shall be constructed to comply with C-1 standards (only one strand of barbed wire is permitted along the top rail or within 2 inches of the top rail). 7) The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit for required spray booths and associated ventilation has not been obtained by April 30, 2010. 5 'C*H'ty Item: Auto Body Shop in C-3 Zone V iy Applicant: Gus Olivas N Map 09-004 File #: SP BONNE,VILLE- ST W 71 'LOARK ST •�.�' - -. .. * �« � . • ISITE -....� . , LF-r--*T, rp ' r { - IL Ir Pw-fi "A" ST Land Item: Auto Body Shop in C-3 Zone � Use Applicant : Gus Olivas -(x - Map File #: SP 09-004 ` BONNEVILLE ST < < - < < SFDU s _ � - = co _ k CLARK ST uiti Commercial Multi-Family SITE LEWIS ST Commercial I I I I "A" ST Zoning Item: Auto Body Shop in C-3 Zone Applicant: Gus Olivas N Map File #: SP 09-004 BONNEVILLE ST w w w w a Q a a _ R- 1 _ co r*-- r r T r C.1 CLARK ST C' 1 R-3 C-1 I R=3- SITE LEWIS ST C=3-1 "A" ST REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 09-006 APPLICANT: Charter College HEARING DATE: 7-16-09 5278 Outlet Drive ACTION DATE: 8-20-09 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Expansion of a College/Technical School in a C-1 District 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Parcel # 115-502-016: a portion of the South half of Section 8, Township 9 North, Range 29 East General Location: 5278 Outlet Dr. Property Size: Approximately 11 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Sandifur Parkway by way of Outlet Drive. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer are available to the site through easements around the property. The property is connected to City utilities. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is zoned C-1 (Retail Business). All surrounding property is zoned C-1 and undeveloped. S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for future commercial uses. The Plan encourages the fostering of adequate provisions for educational facilities throughout the urban growth area. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a Determination of Non-Significance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 (c) (RCW). ANALYSIS In December of 2008 Charter College was granted a Special Permit to locate a facility in the Broadmoor Square Outlet Mall. The College now occupies 10,768 square feet in the center portion of the northern Outlet Mall building. The college space is divided into 7 offices, 10 classrooms, a resource center and a student lounge. Enrollment at Charter College has grown to the point where the College needs to increase its classroom space. This application involves I expansion of the College into an additional 10,000 square feet of tenant space. The expanded area will include 8 more offices and 9 more classrooms. The expansion, like the initial development of the College, is an unclassified use and requires review through the special permit process. The proposed site is zoned C-1 which permits a variety of retail and office type uses. The administrative offices of the College are a permitted use in the district and do not require a special permit to locate in the Outlet Mall. The classrooms, the education/skills training, the student counseling portion of the college requires the special permit review. The College offers programs in computer-aided drafting (CAD), medical insurance coding and billing, computerized bookkeeping and other courses. Eventually the College will offer five bachelor degree programs and nine associate degree programs. The lease agreement requires the College to participate in all common area charges shared by all lessees within the mall. The Outlet Mall contains over 103,000 square feet of floor space. Currently about 57,000 square feet of the mall is occupied. There are seven businesses, a Mini Police Station a church (on a three lease) and Charter College within the occupied space. Forty-five percent of the mall is vacant. The Outlet Mall was constructed to meet building code requirements for retail activities. Colleges and technical schools are classified in the Building Code as either "A" occupancies or "B" occupancies depending on the size of the classrooms. When a building is changed from one occupancy class to another (from an "M" [Mercantile] to an "A" [Assembly] or "B" [Business] for example), the building is required to meet life/safety standards required for the new occupancy classification. The specific size and location of the classrooms and offices will determine the applicable building code standards that will apply to the proposed college expansion. To meet the new occupancy requirements, proper exiting, exit signage, emergency lighting, occupancy separation walls (between retail space and college space), and additional restroom facilities may be required by the Building Code. These requirements are all based on the occupant load of the building. The Building Code has been developed from years of experience with various types of building occupancies. The code has been enacted to promote the life, safety, and protection of people occupying classrooms, offices and other building spaces. 2 A potential problem with a school/college locating in a commercial area is the fact that some retail establishments or restaurants sell or serve liquor. The issue is typically addressed by placing a condition on the Special Permit approval limiting the college's ability to object to a liquor license. FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of Fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The proposed site is located at 5278 Outlet Drive. 2. The proposed College site is zoned C-1. 3. Business offices are permitted uses in the C-1 zone. 4. Colleges are unclassified uses and require review through the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district. S. The College proposes to expand operations by 10,000 square feet of floor area. 6. The site was originally developed as the Broadmoor Outlet Mall. 7. The Outlet Mall currently contains over 103,000 square feet of floor area. 8. Forty-five percent of the outlet mall is vacant. 9. The Municipal Code (PMC 25.78.170) requires one off-street parking space for 300 square feet of floor area for a vocational school, office, or retail store. 10. The Outlet Mall parking lot was designed to meet or exceed the one- parking-space-to-300-square-feet-of-floor-area ratio. 11. A 10,000 square foot expansion of the College will require an additional 33 parking spaces. 12. Colleges can be classified as an "A" or "B" occupancy under the International Building Code. 13. "A" or "B" occupancy building design standards differ from the "M" occupancy standards. 14. The mall was designed and built for "M" occupancy loads. 3 CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060., and determine the following: (1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan encourages the location of educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area. (2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The outlet mall was designed to handle significant traffic with a large parking lot and interior circulation. The parking requirements for the proposed college are identical to the parking requirements for retail and offices uses indicating traffic generated by the proposed college will be similar to other permitted uses in the zone. The proposed use will have less impact on water and sewer utilities than other permitted uses such as hotels and motels, laundromats and restaurants. (3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The proposed college expansion will be located in the Broadmoor Outlet Mall and no exterior changes are planned to the building. The current store front character will be maintained. The College will participate in common area maintenance costs of the mall. (4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof No structures will be built or added to the mall. The site design will remain unchanged. The College will be paying market rent and will be responsible for common area charges like all tenants of the Mall. (5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? 4 The College will generate no more dust, vibrations, flashing lights or fumes than would be expected by permitted retail and offices uses of the zoning district. (6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Experience with the operations with schools and colleges within the community have shown they do not endanger public health or safety and are generally not nuisance generators. TENTATIVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; 2) The college must comply with all requirements of the International Building Code for occupancy prior to occupancy by the building; 3) The storefront appearance of the leased space cannot be altered except as needed to comply with building code exiting requirements; 4) The building, including entrances and restrooms, must be ADA/handicap-compliant prior to occupancy; 5) Occupancy of the building for college purposes will not be permitted until the college complies with all conditions listed above; 6) The college shall not object to the transfer, renewal or issuance of a liquor license for an existing or new establishment within 1,000 feet of the property; 7) The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit has not been obtained for necessary improvements by March 1, 2010. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move, to close the hearing on the proposed college expansion and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the August 20, 2009 meeting. 5 • Item: Special Permit - College Expansion Vicinity Applicant: Charter College N Map File #: SP 09-006 SANDIFUR-PKWY - or LLI SITE 1 • r�" • r��� - 1� , may- / �•'� Land Item: Special Pen-nit - College Expansion � Use Applicant : Charter College N ap File #: SP 09-006 ` SANDIFUR PKWY LLJ Vacant SITE Vacant Comm. Zoning Item: Special Pen-nit - College Expansion Applicant : Charter College x Map File #: SP 09-006 SANDIFUR PKWY LLJ C- 1 SITE C-1 CR ' Paz IAN U .- ����^tali •,tea �..l._, � nr■ J��u?fui��u Ii11�����n�■rnl IN V J ` i rsl ���rl ■..r - - - ,u■ r --- �� ONION 11 v .ee�`n=„�`� ' A I A A ■T.■ �t __.._��.. _��r a it�,. ■;r�x 'chi° o° .° � 0 n ' IN WO ,»eiu o.�u n■ t" oa�� o�eiu °fie __fin••• I — � —' � � j.LIM CD I © 1 � 77 .fo A n tri of ftu 1 e,o a;y'to u.to u�.o car! �` eelo l���`` ''� n■.n MI., ee■�.s �t -off l� �i"���'.�.' !Q - �__ _ � e V REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 09-007 APPLICANT: Philipp Schmitt HEARING DATE: 7/16/09 5604 McKinley Court ACTION DATE: 8/20/09 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Farming in an RS-20 Zone (2000 Block of Road 72) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: The southeast and northeast quarters of the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 21, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, WM less the southerly 165 feet and less road right- of-way. General Location: 2000 Block of Road 72 Property Size: Approximately 28 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Road 72 and Wernett Road. 3. UTILITIES: The proposed use will not need public utilities. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject property is currently zoned RS-20 (Suburban) and consists of two vacant parcels and the Faith Assembly of God Church. Surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: NORTH- R-S-20- County-residential SOUTH- R-S-20- Nazarene Church EAST- R-S-20- County-residential WEST- R-S-20- County-residential 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for Low-Density Residential use. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. ANALYSIS The applicant has requested a Special Permit to locate a corn maze and associate activities on 18 acres of land directly north of the Faith Assembly of God Church on Road 72 (the church occupies 10 acres). A corn maze is a combination of an agricultural use and recreational use. Both use categories' are identified as unclassified uses and as such require a Special Permit before locating within the community. The festival component of the corn maze will include hay-rides, a barnyard animal exposition, piglet races and a concession stand. The applicant has developed corn mazes within the Tri-Cities area for the past 11 years. The first corn maze was located on the corner of Road 100 and Argent Road on property now occupied by the Desert Springs Covenant Church. The proposed corn maze will occupy 11 acres of land directly north of the Faith Assembly Church parking lot. The pumpkin patch portion of the project will be located on 6 acres just south of Wernett Road. A barn yard area for small petting zoo is proposed for a half acre site at the northwest corner of the church parking lot. The church parking lot, which is completely paved and fully lighted, will be used for parking. The general area surrounding the proposed site can be characterized as a suburban very low density area with large pastures, livestock raising and grape vineyards. Truck farming and raspberry production has also occurred in the neighborhood in the past. The actual use of the corn maze and fall festival activities will occur for about a month during the fall. The heaviest use of the corn maze will be on the weekends and near Halloween. Three to six tours of preschool and elementary aged children may occur on weekdays. The site can be accessed from the north or south by Road 72 and from the east by Wernett Road. The area surrounding the proposed corn maze is sparely developed. Homes on adjoining properties the west are located approximately 500 feet west of the proposed site. One of the major concerns over the location of past corn mazes (the one at Rd 100) was the issue of parking. In this case the Faith Assembly parking lot is available for use. The parking lot is completely paved and fully lit in the evening. The parking lot contains over two hundred parking spaces. 2 INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis sections of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for future Low-Density Residential development. 3. The site has been used in the past for agricultural activities. 4. Pastures and vineyards as-well-as animal husbandry occur on adjoining properties. S. The site is zoned RS-20. 6. The site contains 28 acres. 7. The site includes 3 parcels under the same ownership. 8. Agriculture is a permitted accessory use in the R-S-20 zone. 9. The site contains a Church facility with an improved parking lot and two vacant parcels. 10. The site is accessible from the north and south by way of Road 72 and from the east by way of Wernett Road. 11. The proposed crops are corn and pumpkins. CONCLUSIONS Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives, and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed site for low density residential development. The Plan does not specifically address the proposed use. However, the zoning regulations which implement the Plan permit the keeping of farm animals and allows limited agricultural 3 production in R-S-20 zones. The zoning regulations also permit commercial agricultural production by special permit in the R-S-20 zone. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed farm/corn maze is not dependent upon City utilities therefore there will be no adverse impact to city utilities. Peak traffic for the corn maze will not be greater than that associated with the Faith Assembly Church. Road 72 and Wernett Road currently accommodate church traffic. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The existing character is that of a suburban residential neighborhood. The act of growing additional crops in the neighborhood will not alter the existing neighborhood character. The location of other farms within the I- 182 Corridor has demonstrated that farms within close proximity of dwellings can be operated harmoniously with intended uses. The proposed use however will contain public activities for about a month that could disrupt the harmony of the existing neighborhood if conditions are not placed on the proposal. Conditions for parking, litter control, noise control and other issues will be needed for the protection of the neighborhood. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereofP There will be no permanent structures erected with this proposal. Development over the last 10 years within the I-182 Corridor attests to the fact that farming operations do not discourage the development of permitted uses or impair the value of nearby development. The proposed use is a temporary use that will not materially impact property values. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Without conditions the proposed activity could create noise and/or dust that may be objectionable to nearby properties. Conditions related to parking, litter control and noise will need to be placed on the use of the site to safeguard the neighborhood. 4 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The existence of numerous farming operations within the I-182 Corridor demonstrates that the farming portion of the use will not become a nuisance to permitted uses nor will it endanger public health and safety. The use of the corn maze and festival activities could become a nuisance without use conditions. TENTATIVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS (1) The special permit is personal to the applicant; (2) The applicant must provide the City with a designated parking and traffic control plan to be approved by the City Engineer to ensure vehicles use the church parking lot; (3) No on street parking is permitted; (4) A daily litter control plan must be provided to the City to be approved by the Inspection Services Manager; (5) A site security plan must be submitted to the City for police and fire review prior to the issuance of a business license; (6) Portable toilets and sanitation (hand washing) stations must be provided on site. The Inspection Service Manager will determine the number of toilets and sanitation station needed; (7) Portable toilets must be located out of direct sight from adjoining homes. (8) Any night lighting on the site must not spill onto adjacent properties. All lighting must be shielded per PMC 12.32.020. (9) Illuminated signs are prohibited; (10) Signage must be limited to the entrance near the church parking lot. No Signage of any kind is permitted on Court Street, Argent Road or other off-site locations; (11) Event operations must cease by 9:00 pm on weekdays and 9:30 on weekends. (12) No amplified music or public announcement systems are permitted; (13) The applicant must at all times comply with City noise regulations (PMC 9.61); (14) The concession stand must be located adjacent to the church parking lot; (15) The farm activity shall be operated by using best management practices for agricultural production; 5 (16) No irrigation water is permitted to be sprayed or otherwise drain onto the adjoining right-of-way; (17) The corn maze must be setback 30 feet from the west property line of the site and 25 feet from Road 76 and 30 feet from the two homes on the west side of Road 76. (18) The corn maze and festival activities will not be permitted until the applicant obtains a business license and approval of the parking and traffic plan and litter control plan; (19) The site cannot be used for produce stands selling produce other than pumpkins; (20) All temporary fencing, structures, portable toilets, concession stands and other items associated with the corn maze and festival activities must be removed from the site within 15 days of the close of the corn maze; (21) All fields used for crops (corn and pumpkins) must be tilled and restored to a state similar to that which existed prior to the planting of the crops within 15 days of the close of the corn maze; (22) All fields must be treated (with a cover crop or other means) for dust control within 15 days of the close of the corn maze; (23) The Special Permit shall expire on November 15, 2009 any subsequent use of the site for a corn maze will require Special Permit review. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move, to close the hearing on the proposed corn maze and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the August 20, 2009 meeting. 6 'C*H'ty Item: Special Permit - Corn Maze/Farm Vi Applicant: Schmitt - Haywire Farms N Map File #: SP 09-007 lip BUTTERCREEK CL r^ f. 1 oft Y ¢ W'WERNETT RD BUTTERNUT CIRCLE - T� - .SIELVERCREST C,T a MAVE SITE , ROSECREEK CT AGATE ST TER-RAY CT City Limit •- - - - oi COURT ST Land Item: S ec i* al Permit - Corn Maze/Farm Use Applicant: Schmitt Haywire FarmS N Map File #: SP 09-007 ■ MEN • Item: Spec ial Permit - Corn Maze/Farm Zoning Applicant: Schmitt - Haywire Farms N Map 09-007 File #. SP BUTTERCREEK CT i _ RS=20 W WERNETT RD CD 0 L af —I— O C o u n tRCLE Y RS=20 CT MAVE SITE County <CT City Limit AGATE ST TER-RAY CT RGe RS- 12 yS T N W (0 0 RS-20 o Ofl r I F1 I � Z CityL•i�m�it rn C z ? MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 2009 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner SUBJECT: Code Amendment PMC 25.58 I-182 Corridor Overlay District In the fall of 2001 the Planning Commission held several meetings to develop a code amendment providing for development standards in the I-182 Corridor west of Road 36. The City Council accepted the Planning Commission's recommendations by adopting Ordinance # 3521 enacting the 1-182 Corridor Overlay District as Pasco Municipal Code 25.58. The purpose of PMC 25.58 was to create development provisions designed to enhance the aesthetics of commercial development around and near the Road 68 and Road 100 Interchanges. This chapter of the zoning code includes enhanced standards for landscaping and building design and screening. Much of the development that now exists in the I-182 Corridor has occurred since the adoption of the I-182 standards in December of 2001. While not being over bearing these standards have been responsible for visual enhancements to commercial buildings and parking lots on Road 68, Burden Boulevard and the other commercial areas west of Road 36. The development of the garden centers at the Lowes and Wal-Mart buildings along with some of the additional architectural features and landscaping on those projects, are examples of what the code was designed to achieve. The purpose statement of PMC 25.58 states that the Overlay District is to provide additional development regulations to create aesthetically attractive buildings and commercial development within the I-182 Corridor of the city. While PMC 25.58 provides development guidance for buildings and landscaping it does not provide safe guards to protect the intended character of the 1-182 area with respect to ancillary uses and activities. Uses such as special event sales in service station parking lots and itinerant merchants in other parking lots can defeat the whole purpose for which the community established the 1-182 standards. The haphazard display of goods in a parking lot from a vendor totally unrelated to the purpose of building on the lot, is at odds with standards the community now expects in our newly developing commercial areas. Because the Planning Commission played an important role in the creation of the 1-182 Overlay standards staff is seeking direction from the Commission related to ancillary commercial activities in the 1-182 area. If the Planning Commission shares the same concern as staff, ideas for possible code amendments could be drafted for the Commissions' consideration at future meetings. 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 2009 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dave McDonald, City Planner SUBJECT: Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan In 2004, city staff and the Planning Commission were assisted by a consultant in a land use and market study for the 1,000 acres of mostly undeveloped land located west of Broadmoor Boulevard and north of Harris Road. The study advanced a number of development concepts for this area and provided four detailed site development schemes for possible future development. It was about the time the study was being completed that Central Pre-Mix applied for a modification of their special permit to allow the operation of an asphalt plant. Activities surrounding the asphalt plant application and the fact that property owners were concerned about the land use section of the study being overly specific, stopped the forward movement of the study and plan. Despite the fact property owners were invited to participate in the plan development process, the high level of detail in the areas of street layout and land use were not supported. Concepts in the plan were never formally adopted by the city. Much of the growth experienced by the community has occurred west of Road 36 and as a result there are only a few large undeveloped areas left to accommodate future growth. One of those areas is the undeveloped properties west of Broadmoor Boulevard. This area has been referred to as the Columbia Bend area in past Comprehensive Plans. Staff has prepared a draft sub-area plan for the Columbia Bend area that is less detailed than the 2004 planning effort. The draft plan is more of a conceptual plan rather than a detailed plan and it identifies development concepts and policy statements that can be used to guide future development. Staff is seeking feedback from the Planning Commission on the direction of the current planning effort for the Columbia Bend area. Staff would like to begin the process of involving the property owners in this planning effort. If the Planning Commission concurs with the general direction of the plan, staff will meet with the property owners to refine plan concepts and then return to the Planning Commission in late summer for further workshops and public hearings. 1 Columbia Bend Sub-Area Concept Plan City of Pasco 2009 Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS COLUMBIA BEND SUB-AREA PLAN......................................................................2 EXISTING LAND USE.................................................................................................4 ZONING........................................................................................................................6 TRANSPORTATION ...................................................................................................7 UTILITIES.....................................................................................................................9 DEVELOPMENT CONSTRAINTS/ISSUES...........................................................11 DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS .................................................................................14 RIVER ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT......................................................................18 POLICIES ...................................................................................................................22 APPENDIX..................................................................................................................24 Columbia Bend Maps/Illustrations......................................................................2s Resource Lands Chapter from the 2007 Comprehensive Plan............26 Reference Documents..............................................................................................27 Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan I Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan City of Pasco Introduction Pasco experienced a rapid rate of growth between 2000 and 2008. In that eight year period the city's population increased by over 20,000 people from 32,066 to 52,290. In this period of time 130 new subdivisions were developed with over 7,000 new housing units being added to the city. Based on the recent community growth the State Office of Financial Management (OFM) provided estimates for population growth in Franklin County indicating Pasco could see another 30,000 people added to the city by 2027 (2027 is the planning Horizon under the city's current Comprehensive Plan). However the current rate of growth indicates that Pasco will growth by less than half of the OFM projection by 2027. Never-the-less the current rate of growth will create a need for an additional 3,600 housing units by 2027. Much of the 2000-2008 growth has occurred between Road 36 on the east and Road 100/Broadmoor Boulevard to the west. With over 3,000 acres of land rezoned and approved for development since 2000 there are only a few remaining large parcels within the city limits available to accommodate future growth (primarily residential growth). These parcels or areas include the 130 acre site (Mullen, etal) at the northeast corner of Road 68 and Sandifur Parkway, the 411 acre site (DNR) at the Southwest corner of the Road 68 and the I-182 Interchange and the 850 acres located between Broadmoor Boulevard and the west city north of Harris Road. The DNR has expressed little interest in making the 411 acres at the southwest corner of Road 68 and I-182 available for development (the site is currently being farmed). The most significant area of any size within the city limits for future development is the area west of Broadmoor Boulevard and north of I-182. In addition to the 850 acres within the city limits, another 800 acres of adjacent undeveloped land, lies within the Pasco Urban Growth boundary. This general area of the community has sometimes been referred to as the Columbia Bend area. Columbia Bend This study focuses on the Columbia Bend area directly west of Broadmoor Boulevard between Harris Road on the south and the alignment of Dent Road on the north (see figure I.). Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 2 Figure I. d �o CITY Or PA5CO I-182 CONDOR/m5r PA5CO MVELO M W 2000-2000 - la m CQ4/vk, ;f Although within the City limits and/or the Pasco UGA, this area remains sparsely developed and mainly used for natural resource production involving mineral extraction and agricultural production. The study area benefits from the fact it is located more or less in the geographic center of the Tri-Cities region, is near the Columbia River and affords some views toward the river and the cities of Kennewick and Richland. Major employment, shopping, entertainment and transportation facilities are all less than a 15 minute drive from the Road 100 Interchange. The purpose of this study is to review past studies, the current Comprehensive Plan and existing land uses in an effort to determine a direction for future development at a more detailed level than provided for in the Comprehensive Plan. The goal is to provide guidance for property owners and decision makers for a coordinated and efficient long- term development pattern for the area. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 3 Existing Land Use The study area contains 1,160 acres of land. Approximately 62 percent of the area is currently devoted to agricultural production (Horrigan Farms, Pasco Ranch & Rocky Hills Management) and mineral extraction (Central Pre-Mix). Much of the farmland is part of Block 1 of the South Columbia Irrigation project initiated the United States Bureau of Reclamation in the early 1940's. Gravel mining has also occurred in the area for almost as long as the farming operations. Gravel mining began sometime in the 1950's and continues to this day. The vacant land, along with the tail water pond, and the low lands (critical area) along the shoreline represent about 30 percent of the study area. The vacant lands along the western edge of Broadmoor Boulevard have been used by ORV enthusiasts for four-wheeling and dirtbiking for decades. The natural environment in this portion of the study area has been severely degraded because of such activities. Agricultural/farming 420 acres Mineral extraction 302 acres Central Pre-Mix Critical lands 50 acres Vacant lands 372 acres Tail Water Pond 16 acres South Columbia Irrigation District) The natural low bank area along the Columbia River west of Shoreline Road is identified in the City of Pasco Comprehensive Plan as a wetland area and a riparian habitat area. This land is federally owned. Surrounding lands to the north contain a number of large farm fields interspersed with some open undeveloped lands. New residential subdivisions are being developed north of the site on Dent Road and on Kohler Road. Subdivisions in these areas contain lots that are one acre in size. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 4 The Broadmoor Estates and Mediterranean Villas subdivisions are located directly to the east across Broadmoor Boulevard. Commercial land uses extend down Sandifur Parkway and on the south side of the I- 182 Interchange near Chapel Hill Boulevard. The I-182 freeway parallels Harris Road on the south. Where Harris Road and the Freeway part, there is a triangular area that contains a farm field, a truss manufacturing facility and a number of single-family homes. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 5 Zoning The Columbia Bend area is currently zoned R-T (Residential Transition). The R-T zone is generally applied as a holding zone for areas that that lack necessary urban utility services. As utilities become available lands zoned R-T can then be transitioned (through the rezone process) to a zoning classification more in line with the Comprehensive Plan designations for the affected lands. Often R-T lands are rezoned to a suburban or urban residential classification. The 2007 Comprehensive Plan land use designations for the study area include commercial, low-density residential, mixed residential, mixed residential/commercial and open space land uses. The following Table (T-1) correlates Future Land Use Designations from the Land Use Map in the Comprehensive Plan to Zoning Districts listed in PMC Title 25. Table T-1 BROADMOOR LAND USE PLAN Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Corresponding Zoning Districts Mixed Residential Single-family through Multi-family development R-S-20,R-S-12,R-S-1,R-1,R-2, R-3 Low Density Residential Only single-family development R-S-20,R-S-12, R-S-1,R-1,R-1-A Commercial Retail and Offices development O,C-1,C-R,BP Mixed Residential/Commercial Residential and commercial uses mixed R-20—R-3,O,C-1,BP Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 6 Transportation Introduction City and County streets are located on the periphery of the study area only. Broadmoor Boulevard is located to the east, Harris Road is to the south, Shoreline Road is to the west and Dent Road is to the north. Dent Road extends only half-way across the north side of the study area. The study area benefits from its location near the I-182/Road 100 Interchange. Generally any location within the Tri-Cities can be reached from this Interchange within 15 minutes or less. 1-182 Interchange The I-182/Road 100 Interchange is located directly southeasterly of the study area. This interchange provides a convenient connection point to all areas within the Tri-Cities. The interchange will be improved this year with the addition of two new loops to facilitate easier exiting from the freeway and merging with Broadmoor Boulevard. Broadmoor Blvd. Broadmoor Boulevard currently terminates at the northern City limits. Franklin County is in the process of acquiring the right-of-way necessary to extend Broadmoor Boulevard north to Dent Road. The city is also widening Broadmoor Boulevard south of Sandifur Parkway as a part of a new traffic signal installation at the intersection of Sandifur Parkway and Broadmoor Boulevard Harris Rd. Harris Road provides a connecting link from the I-182 Interchange to the properties in the study area and north of the study area. Harris Road carries considerable truck traffic from Central Pre-Mix along with traffic from nearby farming operations and new residential subdivisions both in the City and County. Shoreline Rd. Shoreline Road connects Harris Road and Dent Road along the western edge of the study area. Shoreline Road is a minimally improved bituminous County Road. Portions of the right-of-way for this road have not been dedicated to the public. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 7 Dent Rd. Dent road runs east and west along the northern boundary of the study area for approximately one mile. Like Shoreline Road, Dent Road is not developed to urban street standards. Dent road appears to be built across private property without the benefit of a public right-of-way. Franklin County is planning on connecting Dent Road to the current terminus of Broadmoor Boulevard to coincide with the extension of Broadmoor Boulevard to the north. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 8 Utilities Introduction Water and sewer services are essential components necessary for the development of land. The Pasco Municipal Code requires the connection to water and sewer service as a prerequisite to obtaining a building permit. Water and sewer line do not currently extend into the study area. Water A 20-inch water line extends northeasterly from Court Street along the I- I82 right-of-way to the intersection with Broadmoor Boulevard. That 20- inch line then extends another 2,400 feet on Broadomoor Boulevard to the Broadmoor Boulevard Storage tank (1 million gallons). There are no water lines within the boundaries of the study area. A new 18 million gallon water treatment plant is currently being constructed in the 11300 block of West Court Street. This new plant will provide additional water capacity in the city water system to enable water to be extended into the study area. Sanitary Sewer Sewer service does not exist within the boundaries of the study area. The 16-inch sanitary sewer main located in Court Street near the I-182 bridge is the closest sewer line that can service the study area. There is also a 12-inch sewer line located in Broadmoor Boulevard between Sandifur Parkway and Buckingham Drive. This line was designed to serve properties on the east side of Broadmoor Boulevard. Perhaps with a lift station, a portion of the northeast section of the study area could be serviced by this line, on a temporary basis. The City's Public Works Department is currently studying options for providing sewer service to the study area and lands within the UGA to the north. In the long term, a second sewage treatment plant will be needed. Initial investigations have indicated a new treatment plant will be needed in the Dent Road area. Natural Gas Cascade natural Gas provides gas service in Pasco. Gas service is available in the area near the intersection of Sandifur Parkway and Broadmoor Boulevard. The residential subdivisions to the east of Broadmoor Boulevard and the commercial properties extending down Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 9 Sandifur Parkway, benefit from this service. A six-inch gas line runs south along Brodmoor Boulevard (under I-182) to service areas south of the freeway. The high pressure regulator station and valve are located along the west side of Broadmoor Boulevard south of Harris Road. This station will enable gas service to be extended into the study area. Electrical Electrical service in the study area is split between the Franklin County PUD and the Big Bend Electrical Cooperative. The Franklin County PUD serves the Central Pre-Mix facilities and all properties west of the Wilson farm. The remainder of the area is served by Big Bend. Storm Sewer Storm water run-off in newly developing areas of the city is treated through the use of ex-filtration trenches, dry wells and/or specially designed drainage swales. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 10 Development Constraints/Issues This section identifies some of the site challenges that will need to be addressed for the study area to be fully developed. Some of the issues or constraints could also be viewed as assets. The natural area along the river, for example, could be used for limited public access to the river thereby supporting the vision statement of the Comprehensive Plan dealing with access to the river. Likewise the steeps slopes of the gravel pit may be used to stair step development to preserve future views of a marina and lake that could be developed in the pit. Lack of Sewer Service Lack of sewer service to the area is the most challenging infrastructure need. The nearest available sewer line for the site is a 16" sanitary sewer trunk line that is located in Court Street on the north side of the I-182 bridge. The sewer main in Broadmoor Boulevard was not designed to accommodate properties on the west side of the Broadmoor Boulevard and would not be available to the study area. The easterly one third of the study area may be able to be served by a gravity sewer line connected to the trunk in Court Street. This connection point is located over 2,400 feet from Harris Road. Due to topographical constraints sewer service can only be provided to the balance of the area by the use of one or more lift station. Lack of Water Service While water lines are located in Broadmoor Boulevard and along the easterly portion of Harris Road, no main lines are found within the study area. The existence of the Central Pre-Mix gravel pit creates steep changes in ground elevation over short distances. These elevation differences create some challenges for planning and extending of water lines into the study area. Gravel Mining Current and future gravel mining operations renders approximately 490 acres located in the center of the site off limits to development for many years. (The special permit for gravel mining and concrete production on the Rocky Hills Management property does not expire until 2028. The Central Pre-Mix special permit expires in 2025. The special permit approving the Central Pre-Mix pit for an asphalt plant in 2009 is to be reviewed every 5 years) Gravel mining will continue to alter the topography of the site for many years. The process of gravel mining and the production of ready-mix concrete also creates the potential of nuisance conditions related to dust, noise and large truck traffic. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan I I Tail Water Pond A South Columbia Basin Irrigation tail water pond occupies approximately 16 acres of land in the Northwest quarter of Section 7. The tail water pond and ditch leading to the pond have been located in Section 7 since the inception of the irrigation system. The location of the pond and ditch present some challenges for laying out lots and streets. The pond and ditch are not located in an easement and are on property not owned by the Irrigation District. Incomplete Road System Broadmoor Boulevard currently terminates at the north City Limits. Broadmoor Boulevard is not connected to any part of the community to the north, east or west. (This challenge will be addressed in 2009 with the extension of the Broadmoor Boulevard to the north and the connection of Power Line Road from the east. The County also has plans to extend Dent Road easterly to Broadmoor Boulevard.) Harris Road, Dent Road and Shoreline Road are in poor condition and are not constructed to urban arterial street standards. Resource Lands Designation The Growth Management Act requires the city to identify and designate lands within the Urban Growth Area that have long term significance for the extraction of minerals (RCW 36.70A.170) These lands are referred to as "Resource Lands". Volume II of the city's Comprehensive Plan designates over 400 acres of the study area as mineral resource lands. The Growth Management Act requires the city to protect these lands for mineral extraction. Critical Lands Designation The narrow band of land between the shoreline and Shoreline Road has been identified as a critical area in the city's Comprehensive Plan. This is a wetland area, a habitat area and an area with geological constraints. This area is not suitable for urban development. Challenging Site Entry Harris Road intersects with Broadmoor Boulevard about 400 feet north of the 1-182 Interchange and about 350 south of Sandifur Parkway. This location of Harris Road in relationship to the interchange and Sandifur Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 12 Parkway will present some traffic engineering challenges for future development in the study area. Truck Traffic Due to the Central Pre-Mix operations and to a lesser extent nearby farming, a high percentage of traffic on Harris Road is truck traffic. The truck traffic creates potential conflicts for future non-industrial traffic. Steep Topography The excavation associated with years of gravel mining on the site has created steep slopes around the periphery of the gravel pit. These slopes create changes and opportunities for development. Expensive pressure reducing valves and lift stations will be needed to provide water and sewer service to and from the gravel pit area. The steep slopes will make it more difficult to construct streets to and from of the pit area. The streets within the gravel pit area may not be able to be fully interconnected with surrounding streets. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 13 Development Concepts Development concepts related to land use are those factors or influences which help guide planning for the Columbia Bend Study Area. The following is a list of some factors that help shape planning for the study area: Types of Land Use • Regional Retail --- This category would include big box stores mixed with community and neighborhood shopping facilities. Elements of specialty centers and lifestyle centers could also be included. With a strategic location within the Tri-Cities a retail center in this area would have the capacity to draw shoppers from both sides of the Columbia River. • Offices --- In the past 10 years a number of small scale offices have been built along Sandifur Parkway to the east of the study site. Demand for these types of offices is likely to continue and increase as the area develops. Larger scale office parks are currently located in other parts of the Tri-Cities. While the site location is ideal for serving regional needs large scale office park, this need appears to be served in other areas of the Tri-Cities. • Large Lot Single-Family Homes --- In addition to having large lots (above 12,000 square feet), homes within this category would, contain features and amenities at a high price range than typical homes built in the community. • Medium Lot Single-Family Homes --- These homes would be located on lots of less than 12,000 square feet. Demand for homes in this market range has been demonstrated by the building activity in the Broadmoor Estates Development east of Broadmoor Boulevard. • Condominiums Townhomes Patio Homes ---- Condominiums, Townhouses and Patio Homes all provide a greater range of housing options for Pasco residents. These housing types permit more residents to live near amenities such as parks or the river. • Multi-Family --- This includes 2 to 3 level walk-up apartment buildings with on-site parking and recreation facilities. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Flan 14 • Golf Course --- The study area has been considered in the past for golf course development. In 1993 a general golf course design intermixed with housing was laid out for the eastern 600 acres of the area. This was the first of two golf course proposals considered for western part of Pasco in the past 16 years. Currently no strong demand for golf course development in the Tri-Cities exists. • Parks --- Parks are an essential element of the urban landscape. As the study area develops parks will be needed to serve the residential population. • Open Space --- Open space can include parks and critical areas for fish and wildlife. Open space areas are generally located on publicly owned lands. • Schools --- Based on the land use patterns established in the Comprehensive Plan the study area could see the development of over 4,000 housing units. Elementary schools in the Pasco District accommodate between 500 and 600 students. • Mixed Residential/Commercial --- This use category would include a mix of residential and retail uses on the same site. Typically this involves a building with retail or office uses on the ground level with residential units on the upper floors. • Marina/Boat Basin --- When mining is completed at the Central Pre- Mix gravel pit the floor of the pit will be approximately 30 feet or more below the elevation of Harris Road. With engineering and proper design the depression left by the mining activity could be redeveloped as a marina. • Streets --- The Comprehensive Plan encourages the incorporation of extensive tree and landscape planting along all major arterial and collector streets. Street plantings are an effective means of enhancing the overall appearance of the community. • River Access --- The last paragraph of the vision statement in the Comprehensive Plan states: All residents of the city are afforded access to the Columbia River. Pasco is oriented toward and connected with the River through parks, pathways, bikeways, boat launches and docks. Columbia Bend 5ub-Area Plan 15 Site Organization The general location of land use types within the study area was previously determined through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to these lands use designations there are a number of site organizational considerations that have also been previously determined. • Extension of Sandifur Parkway --- Sandifur Parkway provides the main east/west connection through the center of the study area. The Sandifur Extension should be liberally landscaped to continue the established boulevard appearance. As an arterial direct driveway connection to Sandifur Parkway for single-family residential uses should be prohibited. • Harris Road/Broadmoor Boulevard Connection --- The current connection of Harris Road with Broadmoor Boulevard is located about 260 south of Sandifur Parkway and approximately 400 north of the I-182 on-ramp. This connect will create future traffic conflicts. This street configuration also encircles a 2 plus acre tract that will be difficult to develop and access as a result of the current street configuration. To improve traffic flow and development options for the commercially designated property adjacent Broadmoor Boulevard the Harris Road connection should be eliminated. Harris Road should connect with the extension of Sandifur Parkway. • Connection with Surrounding Streets --- Court Street, Kohler Road and Dent Road are all existing roads around the study area. As the study area develops these roads should connect to and extend into the study area without offset intersections. • Power Line Road --- The northern boundary of the study area is along the alignment of future Power Line Road. This will be a major east/west arterial that should be landscaped and with sidewalks offset from the curb. Direct driveway connections should be prohibited to Power Line Road. • New Major Street Locations --- Major street connections should occur at 1,320 to 2,640 foot intervals when possible. • Regional Retail --- Regional retail uses would be best located near the I-182 Interchange between the realigned Harris Road and Broadmoor Boulevard. Retail and commercial land uses should not extend north on Broadmoor Boulevard further than the Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 16 existing commercially zoned parcels on the east side of Broadmoor Boulevard. • Specialty/Neighborhood Retail --- Specialty and neighborhood retail businesses would be appropriate near portions of a future marina in the Central Pre-Mix gravel pit. • Large Lot Single-Family Homes --- Larger lots should be placed on the elevated sections of the study area toward Power Line Road and along the elevation break between the Adams and Wilson properties. • Medium Lot Single Family Development --- The bulk of the study area designated for low density residential would be appropriate for the bulk of the single-family development. • Parks and Schools --- Neighborhood parks are generally located in the interior of developments containing 160 acres or more of land (eg. Island Estates, Sunny Meadows, The Village at Pasco Heights). Neighborhood parks are often combined with the elementary schools (eg. Maya Angelou, Mc Gee, Virgie Robinson) • Open Space --- The government owned property between the shoreline and Shoreline Road has been designated in the Comprehensive Plan as an open space area. The area is also identified as a critical area geologically and for habitat purposes. Hiking and walking trails through this area would provide for public access and minimal use of the area for recreation and public enjoyment of the river. Trails through this area to view points along the river would support the Comprehensive Plan vision statement dealing with access to the river. • Utilities --- The Pasco Public Works Department is currently undertaking a study to locate a new waste water treatment plant in or adjacent to the study area. The Public Works study focuses on property north and south of Dent Road about 3,800 feet east of the Columbia River (ground elevation of less than 370 feet). Columbia Bend Sub-Area Flan 17 River Oriented Development Introduction Since the late 1980's the City of Pasco has participated with other cities and agencies within the Tri-Cities in the development of various planning documents related to rivershore enhancement. These plans included overall goals of developing the rivershore by providing a balance of commercial, recreational and residential uses. The 1988 Report to the Pasco Chamber of Commerce discussed the future development of the area north of the I-182 Columbia Point Bridge. In addition to suggesting that the rivershore in this area is one of the best resources in the Tri-Cities the report encouraged the development of boat basins and canals. The Tri-Cities, Regional Rivershore Enhancement Plan of 1989 suggested the current study area has the potential for commercial/residential development with the opportunity for several boat basins with canals and docks developed in front of new homes. The notion of locating a marina with mixed uses (commercial and various residential) has been a common theme in many of the past planning efforts related to the Columbia Bend area. Gravel Pit Reclamation/Marina Development Reclaiming and redeveloping the expired gravel pit presents a number of practical difficulties due to the substantial difference in elevation between the bottom of the gravel pit and the surrounding properties. Portions of the pit floor are approximately 30 feet lower than the surrounding area. With an elevation of 330 feet, portions of the pit are 10 feet lower than the normal level of the Columbia River. The main operating floor of the pit is currently anywhere from 7 to 10 feet above the surface of the Columbia River. With further excavation and the development of a canal or channel to the river the Central Pre-Mix gravel pit would lend itself well to the development of a marina with associated housing and commercial activities. Approximately 140 acres of the study site have been excavated as a part of the Central Pre-Mix gravel pit to within 10 feet or less of the surface of the Columbia River. Another 90 acres could be excavated as the gravel pit operations move on to nearby leased lands that have been granted special permits for gravel extraction. The marina area on Columbia Point in Richland occupies about 15 acres. In anticipation of future reclamation efforts Central Pre-Mix retained an architecture and development firm (Kimball Fritzemeir) to prepare several concept drawing depicting a marina and related development in the gravel pit. The concept drawings encompass about 40 acres of the existing gravel pit site. Columbia Bend flub-Area Plan 16 Figure 1 is a plan view of a marina area connected with a canal to the Columbia River just north of Rivershore Estates. This plan contains both private and public mooring for boats, a beach for public access to the water and approximately 200 dwellings units. The southeast corner of the proposed site is devoted to a marina and mixed use commercial area. C •a.��.� y r 1� - ..t w W Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 19 Figure 2. is a depiction of the boat canal from the river to the harbor with a bridge crossing for Harris Road. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 20 Figure 3. Illustrates a boardwalk along the water's edge, moorage and restaurants with dwellings on upper floors. 1 AV — s AO e-- Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 21 Policies Introduction Volume I of the Pasco Comprehensive Plan contains a number of goal and policy statements to guide land use actions and development within the city. The following goals and policies supplement those contained in Volume I of the Comprehensive Plan and apply specifically to the Columbia Bend Area. Housing CB-H-1 Encourage the development of higher density residential development including condominiums, townhouses and patio homes within the mixed residential areas near the Columbia River. CB-H-2 Dwelling units taller than two stories should be excluded from locating immediately adjacent to any future lake/marina in the Central Pre-Mix gravel pit area. CB-H-3 Promote the development of mixed uses communities (residential on the upper floors of commercial buildings) near the future lake/marina in the Central Pre-Mix gravel pit area. Transportation CB-T-1 Offset street connections with established streets in the area should be prohibited. CB-T-2 The west side of Broadmoor Boulevard should be landscaped to match the east side. CB-T-3 The extension of Sandifur Parkway to the West should include a curvilinear sidewalk and landscaping to matching the existing developed portion of Sandifur Parkway. CB-T-4 Permit no access driveways on the west side of Broadmoor Boulevard between 1-182 and Sandifur Parkway. CB-T-4 Relocate the Harris Road connection from Broadmoor Boulevard to the future westward extension of Sandiur Parkway. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 22 Commercial CB-C-1 Development of small individual commercial sites should not be permitted until a master site development plan has been established for commercially designated areas. CB-C-2 Large commercial parking lots with access to arterial streets should be designed with entry ways that permit vehicle stacking for a minimum of 120 feet prior to accessing rows of parking stalls. CB-C-3 Encourage commercial development to maintain a consistent architectural, landscape and signage theme. CB-C-4 Encourage interconnected access between commercial development projects. CB-C-5 Support the redevelopment of the Central Pre-Mix gravel pit for marina related uses. CB-C-6 Support the location of regional retail facilities near the intersection of I-182 and Broadmoor Boulevard. Utilities CB-U-1 Support efforts to locate a new wastewater treatment plant on Dent Road to the east of Kohler Road. Open Space CB-0-1 Support the development of hiking paths and nature trails between the Columbia River and Shoreline Road CB-0-2 Establish view points along the rivershore in conjunction with the development of paths and trails. Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 23 Appendix Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 24 Columbia Bend Maps/Illustrations Columbia Bend 5ub-Area Plan 25 Columbia Bend Study Area N / f _ - - h6 9r W W7 W. , 'M 7X r 1r a �r- - r _ 3 • r _ IARRIS RD z � FF ftk2 F•� / {4' - sue f Legend ' �b ® Study Area L� UGB 2007 City Limits �l°a# /^7\ ?.,r ±�\ � a Alf ~ r n:& n 8• ;�. k. a Ownership Aw- \\X N = ._. I C S f V i I I r � F HARRIS RD x Legend �y r, Study Area Parcels 0 Central Pre-Mix - 0 Dale Adams •{ .f: ��� ""r... Dale Adams/Northridge Associates c 0 Horrigan Farms wT - 0 Pasco Ranch Q Rocky Hills Mgmt. USA ,p, �. �. ,j Y + ^t • G F i _ I�``._.. Comprehensive Plan Designations N Z - W CD J .0 . J - � O a in HARRIS RD _ Legend - Open Space/Parks \ f Low-Density Residential ,\ Mixed Residential ^� '�i / fir r• Mixed Residential/Commercial Commercial General Land Use N « z W J 0 O Y DENT +;I 01 I I O1 i i of r —————————— HARRIS RD J Legend f Study Area Q SCHOOL ® COMMERICAL _? OPEN SPACE i +r /►*. �N..t.,u F. O AGRICULTURE n - Q CENTRAL PRE MIX RESIDENTIAL – O VACANT i r t - Existing Traffic Circulation N r DENT RD \ r ' TO DOWNTOWN PASCO TRI-CITIES AIRPORT HARRIS RD h r r_ _ Utilities N Lu �X O � _ q ., � f � •s .. Z .4.3 III •` i ..� {a v .r R T Legend zr HARRIS RD r 7 2 - NATURAL GAS .kl• WATER ® SEWER Mineral Resource Lands Per Ord# 3866 Comp Plan N � p ) Uj x KJ O r• t 1 ;w j Legend r '" HARRIS RDf 0 Resource Lands fit �V-a�^�•a � r ±4yrr • t f t. i•<i ..CMS "'A' ' t 1 �a.r 1 Irl 4 r� • x ♦ u Circulation Plan N dh IL OF LIPr S" _^"� as �i>p�►�,.. ,��.._ "''� r: .7 , .f .. a f� 4..�x A `��{.' � ;,P ,.,d +� \ • �, -e.,3 �,�...�..'y ,� t r♦ � 1; 4., fa,l.�1 j�,�;� St�.:.,j;l.4 �it1�T ,i � iu� �� "ar• Y�,'' r°+i.;!� 'Pr• ���r § 2ls�¢# J�u •� i .hf� X.Sc•I'$J�♦� .T.:',�Rl.� �. '�.. �3���t. '`�� _._ � �M �•I� � � Zoning Concepts N _ p - ' _Aw w R-1/R-3 p ° R-1/R-S-1 R-2/R-3 - p �1 a C-1 -- R-3/C-1 �., HARRIS RD _ iu: Land Use Concepts N 0j _ - Ix Z - -: W o Single Family Muti-Family o I Schools/Parks T' • • \, Housing intergrated with m - s,. • • ' Stee Topography o Regional Retail , r •' \` o Neighborhood \\\ o Services Specialty Retail/Restaurants m Offices. ' Multi-Family HARRIS RD _ l -. • Gr' Resource Lands Chapter from the 2007 Comprehensive Plan Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 26 Resource Lands Resource Lands Defined Resource lands are those agricultural, forest and mineral lands which have long-term commercial significance. It is the intent of the Growth Management legislation that these resource lands be protected and preserved for future generations. This chapter provides the framework from which future regulations will be developed and or maintained to preserve resource lands. Agricultural Lands Agricultural production occurs within the City and its UGA as a non- conforming permitted use. Wheat, alfalfa, potatoes, corn and onions are the primary crops produced within the UGA. Due to the proximity of urban development, the location of major utility lines, the location of 1-182 and other major roadways, the agricultural lands within the city and urban growth area do not have long term commercial significance. The UGA by its very nature was established for the purpose of facilitating and accommodating urban growth. Lands outside of the growth area are to be protected for rural activities such as long-term agricultural production. By establishing the UGA, agricultural lands of long-term commercial significance are being protected. Mineral Resources The GMA requires each county and each city in the State to designate, where appropriate, "mineral resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and that have long term significance for the extraction of minerals." (see RCW 36.70A.170). The Washington Administrative Code defines mineral resources (WAC 36.190.030 (14) as lands primarily devoted to the extraction of minerals or that have known potential long term commercial significance for mineral extraction. The Department of Natural Resources Handbook for "Mining Regulations in Washington" states that the definition of surface mining in RCW 78.44 specifically excludes the on-site processing of minerals, such as concrete batch plants, asphalt batch plants, rock crushing, and chemical processing. The Handbook explains that local jurisdictions can regulate these activities. The City of Pasco relying on direction of the Growth Management Act and the Department of Natural Resources has defined mineral resource lands for the purposes of Comprehensive Planning (See Appendix I Glossary of Terms) as those lands devoted to the extraction of minerals. Designation of Mineral Resource Lands The Mineral Resources Map for Franklin County (County Comprehensive Plan pg 118) indicates there are 21 mineral resource sites within Franklin County. The mineral resource lands were identified through a review of local conditions, DNR surface mining data (DNR Permits), USGS mapping and Soil conservation Service soils data. Of the 21 sites identified in the Franklin County map three are located within the Pasco city limits. The Pasco Shops site located near the southwest corner of Argent Road and Stearman Lane is in fact a stock pile site for the County Road Department and not a mineral extraction location. The other two sites are located on the western edge of the community in Section 12, Township 9 North Range 28 East and Section 7, Township 9 North Range 29 East. The sites (land owned by different owners) are part of the Central Pre-Mix pit that is used for mineral extraction. These are the only known mineral resource lands of commercial significance within the UGA. These lands contain one of the best gravel deposits in Franklin County. Gravel has been mined at this location since the early 1950's. Prior to that time it has been reported that gold mining occurred in the area. Currently the only permitted mining sites in Pasco are located on adjacent properties north of Harris Road in the western part of Pasco. Presently, Central Pre-Mix and Concrete Company is mining the lands and producing various types of crushed rock. Central Pre-Mix also produces ready mix concrete utilizing gravel the company mines. The crushed rock and sand that are derived from the Pre-Mix pit are used throughout the region in the construction industry. Because of the importance of gravel for construction activities and the lack of other known mineable sites, there is a need to protect the lands located in Section 12 and Section 7 for mineral extraction. With the Pasco UGA population project to increase by about 30,500 over the next 20 years there will be an ever increasing need for mineral resources for new infrastructure, and residential, commercial and industrial development. It has been estimated that there is enough resource materials in these lands that mining could continue for 25 more years. Through past planning activities the City has indicated the mined out lands would be an appropriate location for a marina based mixed use commercial and residential neighborhood. This would allow the mined area to have a useful purpose once the mining operations cease. While the lands described above have been designated for mineral extraction, such use designation is considered an overlay use only. Upon completion of the mineral extraction the intended and ultimate use of the land is as shown on the land use map discussed in the Land Use Chapter and as shown in land use map of Appendix VIII. Mineral Resource Protection Mineral resource lands, once designated, are to be protected for the extraction of minerals RCW 36.79A.060 (1)(a). In addition to controlling the density and uses around the designated mineral resource lands the city will protect mineral resources through implementation of the notification requirements of RCW 36.70A.060(1)(b). All plats, short plats, binding site plans and developed plans approved or issued for development activities within 500 feet of designated mineral resource lands will contain the following notice: "This (plat/short plat/etc) is near a designated mineral resource area on which a variety of commercial activities may occur that are not compatible with residential development for certain periods of limited duration. An application might be made for mining-related activities, including mining, extraction, washing, crushing, stockpiling, blasting transporting, and recycling of minerals." Extraction of Mineral Resources Due to their industrial nature gravel pits, mining, and quarries are not permitted uses in any zoning district. They are considered unclassified uses that are deemed to require special review to consider, on a case by case basis, their impacts on adjacent uses, uses within the vicinity and impacts upon surrounding infrastructure. The granting of a conditional use permit/special permit for mineral extraction does not guaranty or include using mineral resource lands for the operation of an asphalt batch plant or concrete pre-mix batch plant. Asphalt batch plants, hot mix asphalt batch plants or concrete pre-mix batch plants are industrial uses permitted only within I-3 Heavy Industrial Districts or upon approval of a conditional permit in the I-2 District. Under limited circumstances such uses may be considered for a conditional permit/special permit in association with the extraction of minerals on designated mineral resource lands only. Special permit applications for the location of asphalt batch plants, hot mix asphalt batch plants or concrete pre-mix batch plants in association with the extraction of minerals on designated mineral resource lands may not be approved due to the location of the resource lands within the UGA. In reviewing an application the city will consider the impacts of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, air borne toxins and the issues listed in PMC 25.86.060. Other Resource Lands Other than the mineral lands discussed above, there are no known resource lands within the Pasco UGA. Resource Lands Map The map identifying Mineral Resources Lands in the Pasco UGA can be found in Appendix VIII. Reference Documents Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan 27 References Documents ■ Community Development Policy Plan (City of Pasco) 1980 ■ A Report to the Greater Pasco Area Chamber of Commerce Regarding The: Alternatives for Development and Enhancement of the Pasco/Franklin County Shoreline (Shoreline Improvement Committee)1988 ■ Tri-Cities Regional Rivershore Enhancement Plan (The NBBJ Group) 1989 ■ 1-182 Sub-Area Report (McConnell/Burke) 1992 ■ Golf Course Feasibility Analysis (Blue T Golf, INC) 1993 ■ Comprehensive Plan 1995-2015 (City of Pasco) 1995 ■ 1-182 Sub Area Report Update (Huitt-Zollars, Inc) 2003 ■ Pasco 1-182 Corridor Subarea Transportation Plan (The Transpo Group) 2004 ■ Comprehensive Plan 2007-2027 (City of Pasco) 2008 Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 2009 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Jeffrey B. Adams, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Rivershore Amenities Plan 2009 Past planning efforts pertaining to the local shorelines have resulted in a plethora of documents ranging from regional, cooperative efforts to local plans. Some of the plans are broad in scope and general in their outlook; others are highly focused with measurable outcomes. For example, some of the broader goals of the 2000 Sacagawea Heritage Trail plan included enhancing livability and economic vitality, and promoting tourism. More focused plan goals included providing trail continuity, enhancing connectivity with upland areas and linking City parks, protecting and interpreting cultural, historical and natural resources, and providing affordable improvements. The objective of the 2009 Rivershore Amenities Plan is to review some of these past planning efforts, and to consolidate and update goals, input and data from disparate sources into a single City of Pasco Shoreline planning document with narrow, metric action items. 1 Pasco 2009 Rivershore Enhancement Plan 1. Executive Summary Past planning efforts pertaining to the local shorelines have resulted in a plethora of documents ranging from regional, cooperative efforts to local plans. Some of the plans are broad in scope and general in their outlook; others are highly focused with measurable outcomes. The objective of this plan is to review past planning efforts, and to consolidate and update goals, input and data from disparate sources into a single City of Pasco Shoreline planning document with narrow, metric action items. 2. Review of Previous Plans and Related Documents The following documents were reviewed in the preparation of this plan: a. Comprehensive Plan 2007-2027 b. BPIC Shoreline Permit; April 2008 c. Parks &Recreation Plan 2005 Update d. Broadway Properties Land Use and Market Analysis; December 2004 e. Master Plan; Sacajawea Heritage Trail: May 2000 £ Tri-Cities Rivershore Enhancement; 1997 g. Pasco Rivershore Enhancement Vision 3. Matrix The following river-related elements can be found in the above documents (see matrix): a. Access b. Parking c. Bike Path/Trail d. Park/ Sport Field e. Picnic/Pavilion f. Restroom g. Pier/Boat Launch h. Water Feature/Fountain i. Environmental j. Interpretive k. Commercial Development 1. Residential Development m. Trash Cans n. Dog Waste Station o. Levee Lowering p. Historic q. View Shed r. Beach s. Amphitheater t. Landscaping 4. Inventory of existing amenities The following amenities have been installed along the City of Pasco shoreline to date: a. Access b. Parking c. Bike Path/Trail d. Park/ Sport Field e. Picnic/Pavilion f. Restroom g. Pier/Boat Launch h. Water Feature/Fountain i. Environmental j. Interpretive k. Commercial Development 1. Residential Development m. Trash Cans n. Dog Waste Station o. Levee Lowering p. Historic q. View Shed r. Beach s. Amphitheater t. Landscaping 5. Challenges and Opportunities a. Location/Distribution of current amenities b. Levees c. Water d. Restrooms e. Shade f. Dog facilities 9. 6. Updated Goals and Objectives-- The goals of the 2000 Sacagawea Heritage Trail plan are as follows: a. Promote cooperation among jurisdictions b. Provide trail continuity c. Enhance connections with: i. Upland areas ii. Create links with parks, civic and cultural activities d. Encourage regulators and developers of adjacent private property to enhance connections,buffers, etc. e. Promote safety through quality, consistency and appropriateness of- i. design ii. construction iii. maintenance f. Increase visibility of the Trail and the rivers within all communities g. Facilitate way-finding h. Protect and interpret cultural,historical and natural resources i. Design for environmental sustainability j. Plan affordable improvements k. Enhance accessibility(ADA) 1. Plan for regulatory approval m. Maintain flood control n. Enhance livability o. Enhance economic vitality p. Generate financial support for proposed improvements q. Promote tourism 7. Proposed Linkages and Amenities 8. Possible Funding Sources 1 o r Q O o -)3 m o -- W o� _� • o � 1 PASCO P1 SANDIFUR PKWY N m F--] - 00 OO \\. cl 1 O co 4L 2 Legend o-r l Boat Basin Renovation w Broadmoor Study Area LZ Comp Plan Critical Areas 1111111 lily Comp Plan Resource Lands r. �3 Corridor Plan Potential Gateways � � 3R 39j Corridor Plan Potenital Corridors V � Levee Lowering Corps of Engineers Port of Pasco BPIC Master Plan Sacagawea Heritage Trail Plan Rivershore Amenities Inventory Previous Planning Areas \ NOTICE:NO WARRANTY OF ACCURACY.The information shown on the attached map was ompiled f,,,,,by the City of Pasco,its employees and consultants.The City of Pasco does not aunt the uccuruey of anything set fonh on the map.Any person or entity requesting u copy should eondua an independent Inquiry regarding the Information shown on the map,including but not limited"''e location of any property lines,zones,sent-,sobdiyisions,or other geogrmNe features.Such features may or may not exist and may or may not exist st the location shown.Neither the City of Pasco nor its employees or officers shell be liable for information shown on this map,nor for any oral representation provided based upon said map. 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 — z CITY OF w 0 0 \ I 0 o SANDIFUR PKWY _ N D-u 14 m 7 R�7h HARRIS RD \ CO -I w E a° p \ WERNE RD- - \. — mn, co p2 y� / AIDS 0RTH. • A R.39'- - Rivershore Amenities Inventory Distance Markers NOTICE:NO WARRANTY OF ACCURACY.The information shown on the mmehed map was om ad for use by the City of Pasco,its employees and consultants.The City of Pasco does not want the menmey of anything set forth on the map.Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent Inquiry regarding the Information shown on the map,including but not limited to,the loeation of any property line.,zones,street.,subdivisions,or other geographic features.Such features may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the localion ahown.Neither the City of Pasco not its employees or officers shall be liable for information shown on this map,nor for any oral representation provided based upon said map. 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 — z CITY OF w 0 0 \ I 0 o SANDIFUR PKWY _ N m IS D-u 14 HARR -RD i Cp —� M�7h- a o S ENS� '\ I WERNE RD— co �. — mn, i co OZ ❑ It It I i - AIDS ` IvoRTH'��PiS R 39� Rivershore Amenities Inventory Levee Lowering Army Corps of Engineers NOTICE:NO WARRANTY OF ACCURACY.The information shown on the mmehed map was om ad for use by the City of Pasco,its employees and consultants.The City of Pasco does not want the menmey of anything set forth on the map.Any person or entity requesting a copy should conduct an independent Inquiry regarding the Information shown on the map,including but not limited to,the loeation of any property line.,zones,street.,subdivisions,or other geographic features.Such features may or may not exist and may or may not exist at the localion alt wn.Neither the City of Pasco nor its employees or officers shall be liable for information shown on this map,nor for any oral representation provided based upon said map. 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,- 0 ,-