HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-18-2009 Planning Commission Meeting Packet PLANNING COMMISSION - AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. June 18, 2009
I. CALL TO ORDER:
II. ROLL CALL: Declaration of Quorum
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 21, 2009
IV. OLD BUSINESS:
A. Preliminary Plat Casa Del Sol Div II (Fastrack Inc.) (South of Sandifur
Parkway between Road 52 and Road 44)(MF# PP 09-001)
B. Preliminary Plat Chapel Hill Div II (Liberty Bankers) (Woodbine Road) (MF#
PP 09-002)
C. BRAC Plan Wagenaar Reserve Center Base Realignment and Closure
(BRAG) Redevelopment Plan (MF# INFO 08-025)
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Special Permit Location of a Community Service Facility in a C-1 Zone
(3901 W Court St.) (Planned Parenthood) (MF# SP 09-
005
B. CDBG 2010 Annual Action Plan (City Wide) (MF# CDBG 09-004)
VI. WORKSHOP:
C. Code Amendment PMC 25.58 I-182 Corridor Overlay District (City of
Pasco) (MF# CA 09-001)
D. Sub-Area Plan Columbia Bend Sub-Area Plan (West of Broadmoor Bvld.
north of Harris Rd) (City of Pasco)
VII. OTHER BUSINESS:
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
REGULAR MEETING May 21, 2009
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Todd Samuel.
POSITION MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT
No. 1 Todd Samuel, Chairman
No. 2 James Hay
No. 3 Andy Anderson
No. 4 David Little
No. 5 Joe Cruz
No. 6 Ray Rose
No. 7 Tony Schouviller
No. 8 Jana Kempf
No. 9 Vacant
APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS:
Chairman Samuel read a statement about the appearance of fairness for
hearings on land use matters. Chairman Samuel asked if any Commission
member had anything to declare. Commissioner Little recused himself from the
Special Permit Application for the location of a Salvation Army Corps
Community Center. Commissioner Schouviller recused himself from the Rezone
Application of 921 N. 241h Avenue.
Chairman Samuel then asked the audience if there were any objections based
on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness questions regarding the items
to be discussed this evening. There were no objections.
Chairman Samuel asked the audience if there were objections to any
commissioner hearing any matter. There were no objections from the audience.
ADMINISTERING THE OATH:
Chairman Samuel explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial
hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or
affirmation. Chairman Samuel swore in all those desiring to speak.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Commissioner Little moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, that the
minutes dated April 16, 2009 be approved as mailed. The Motion carried
unanimously.
-1-
OLD BUSINESS:
A. Special Permit Remand Hearing on Location of an Asphalt
Batch Plant (CPM Development Corp.) (11919
Harris Road) (MF# SP06-010)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Community 8s Economic Development Director Rick White stated the staff report
has been developed over the course of several months. It began with the March
19, 2009 open record hearing, based on information and testimony received at
that hearing and from a significant amount of direction received from the
Planning Commission received at the deliberation meeting on March 26, 2009.
Staff has developed the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, the special use criteria
and the conditions for mitigation associated with the special land use permit.
The heart of the mitigation measures and approval recommendation is
something called the air and odor program. There are 21 mitigations and #21 is
the air and odor program. It takes a shared view of the responsibility for
conformance and enforcement of conditions of the mitigation, which not only
rely on the Department of Ecology, which is based in Spokane, and the City of
Pasco. There are a number of components of the air and odor program where
you will see the Dept. of Ecology and the City of Pasco in the same sentence
under the same umbrella for conformance or enforcement of conditions of
mitigation. It is fairly complicated and is based on information provided by CPM
for a similar plant, the Perry Plant in the Spokane Valley.
Commissioner Cruz questioned the permit fees and how the City would recoup
those costs for an independent inspector which would cover potential additional
oversight.
Mr. White stated yes, that is listed as a special condition if a special inspection
is required due to a response of an odor complaint and its resolution then the
conditions do provide for CPM to pay for that special investigation.
Commissioner Cruz further clarified the City would charge the permit fee to
cover costs for City staffs oversight of this facility and noted there are intense
permit conditions. He further stated he would suggest an annual fee and in the
event of an inspection, CPM would pay additional fees.
Commissioner Hay stated the air and odor program is well documented and with
the inspections required is very complete.
Commissioner Anderson stated he is opposed to it, but does not see any way of
preventing it. He feels it is an overreach of the initial intention of the special use
-2-
permit for gravel. With the advice of the City Attorneys and staff he feels it is
being shoved down their throats and leaves them no choice.
Commissioner Schouviller had no comment.
Commissioner Kempf had no comment.
Chairman Samuel stated he wants the City Council to have the full benefit of
their recommendation and read the following statement. In 2006-2007 the
Planning Commission listened to evidence presented by CPM on the impacts
associated with moving the Richland Asphalt manufacturing equipment to
Pasco. Most of us on the board had personally smelled the Richland plant on a
regular basis over the years especially when we had occasion to drive by the
plant or sometimes shopping at Winco or golfing at Columbia Point. This first
hand negative experience with the Richland plant the belief that the smells and
odors would be similar or worse for residents in proximity to that plant if the
existing plant was moved to Pasco. Together with what many perceived to be an
inadequate sensitivity to concerns of the citizens of Pasco who would be living
around the plant led the Planning Commission to unanimously recommend to
the City Council that the special permit be denied in 2007. City Council adopted
our recommendations and voted unanimously in 2007 to deny the special
permit. CPM took the City Council decision to Franklin County Superior Court
where upon looking at the evidence the Court sent back the matter to the City of
Pasco for further proceedings on the request for the special permit. The decision
being sent back to the City was based primarily on the Court's findings that (1)
the final environmental impact statement that was prepared under the direction
of the City of Pasco concluded that the asphalt plant operations would result in
no significant impacts. (2) The City of Pasco has permitted several other
industrial activities to be performed in this general area including the concrete
batch plant and the roof truss fabrication facility and (3) that the area proposed
for the asphalt batch plant has been specifically designated in the City of Pasco's
Comprehensive Plan as a mineral resource area and finally the applicant is
permitted by the City of Pasco to operate the proposed location as a gravel pit for
the next 17 years. CPM has made a number of changes to the special permit
request. Primarily they are no longer proposing to move the Richland asphalt
plant to Pasco, they now are proposing to set and operate a new state-of-the-art
asphalt batch plant with a growing track record for a no complaint operation
throughout the State of Washington. During the past few months the Planning
Commission has received a significant amount of testimony from a wide range of
sources stating repeatedly that the new state-of-the-art asphalt plant now being
proposed to be constructed and operated in Pasco will have a negligible impact
to residents. In my mind the testimony we received focused on three primary
areas of change from the original proposal (1) that CPM willingness to accept
and comply with the 21 specific special mitigation conditions placed in the
special permit, many of these special conditions were a direct response to
citizen's concerns. A special noteworthiness is the detailed air and odor program
and a public hearing within five years to review the operation of the plant. In
-3-
addition, several examples of the same or very similar plant design being
operated in the State of Washington in fairly close proximity to residential
neighborhoods successfully and without complaint from neighbors was provided
and finally was testimony from Mr. White who personally visited a plant in
Auburn, WA and reported that during his visit he did not witness any
objectionable issues and he even interviewed neighbors in close proximity to the
plant and learned that they had no complaints and did not even know an
asphalt plant was being operated. These three areas along with the vast majority
of testimony received during these hearings from the experts backs the finding
in the official environmental impact statement for the plant that finds that the
asphalt plant operations would result in no significant impacts. We heard from a
number of Pasco citizens who are concerned about the potential impact of this
plant will have on the quality of their life. He appreciates their testimony and
their input did not go unheard in fact several of the special mitigating conditions
were developed to address resident's concerns. You may not have received
everything that you wanted, but your voices were heard and you did make a
difference. In conclusion, he agrees with the testimony from several people who
voiced that by recommending denial of the first permit application of CPM to
move the old Richland asphalt plant to Pasco, we have significantly reduced the
potential risk to residents of Pasco. We have gained CPM's agreement to
construct a state-of-the-art asphalt plant with the latest dust and odor
mitigation technology and we have gained their willingness to implement over 21
mitigation conditions that significantly reduce the potential impacts and improve
the look and feel of the area of the plant which is specifically addressed by this
landscaped berm that they have agreed to put in. This berm should significantly
improve the look of Harris Road and further we have gained CPM's agreement to
contribute $250,000 to reconfigure Harris Road in the future. All of this
information compels me to reverse my position on the asphalt plant from three
years ago and recommend the City Council approve this new and improved
request for a special permit.
Commissioner Little stated from the beginning up until now, the recent
approach is a whole lot different than what was onset in the beginning. A lot of
the issues have been mitigated or resolved and still has a little concern with the
traffic patterns have changed considerably in the past two years and will have
considerably more trips once the new high school opens. He stated this is a
better situation than before.
Commissioner Cruz reiterated this situation could have been preventable; CPM's
decision to relocate the existing "stinky" plant was an unnecessary step they
took early on. The second thing is after reading the judge's decision and
listening to the testimony it does not give the Planning Commission or the City
much recourse. He does not agree with the judge's interpretation, but he is not a
judge. The third point is they have put in a lot of time and effort and commends
City staff for their work on the mitigation measures for the plant and specifically
for the continuous odor response program. These things should really help to do
an adequate job of addressing most of the concerns as previously stated. Finally,
-4-
he suggests a time frame for this special permit. If they grant the special permit
for five years that gives the Planning Commission the opportunity to revisit the
issue and if they are not happy with the results after five years they are not
under any obligation to grant an additional permit. That gives CPM the
opportunity to prove that they can be a good neighbor.
Commissioner Kempf moved, seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the
Planning Commission adopt the findings of fact, conclusions and mitigation
measures as contained in the May 21, 2009 staff report.
Commissioner Kempf further moved, seconded by Commissioner Anderson that
based on the findings of facts as adopted the Planning Commission recommend
the City Council grant Central Pre-Mix a special permit for the location of a hot
mix asphalt plant at 11919 Harris Road with conditions as contained in the May
21, 2009 staff report.
Mr. White stated this item would continue down the ordinary path for special
permits, which would go to City Council on June 15, 2009. Council would hold a
closed record hearing and act on the Planning Commission's recommendation or
they could deem it necessary to hold a closed record appeal and discuss the
matter further or perhaps even remand the matter back to the Planning
Commission. Another option is if this is appealed by a party, the City Council
would then hold a closed record appeal based on the evidence and the testimony
received, however the timeframe is uncertain and could be up to several months
from today's date.
B. Rezone R-2 (Medium Density Residential) to R-3
(Medium Density Residential) (Chad Bagley)
(921 24th Avenue) (MF# Z 09-002(
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Staff had no comments.
Commissioner Little moved, seconded by Commissioner Cruz to adopt the
findings of fact and the conclusions as contained in the staff report of April 16,
2009. The motion was unanimously approved.
Commissioner Little further moved, seconded by Commissioner Cruz based on
the findings of fact and conclusions there from the Planning Commission
recommend the City Council approve the rezone. The motion was unanimously
approved.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
-5-
A. CDBG American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
(ARRA) of 2009 CDBG Formula Allocation (City
Wide) (MF# CDBG 09-002)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Staff explained to the Planning Commission at the meeting of April 16, 2009 the
purpose of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. The
City of Pasco received an entitlement of $163,082 for block grant activities.
These funds may be used to carry out a wide range of community development
activities directed at revitalizing neighborhoods, economic development and
providing improved community facilities and services. Priority must be given to
projects that can award based on bids within 120 days. At the time of that
meeting, it was thought that an amendment to the 2009 Annual Action Plan
would be required. Since that time, HUD has issued the notice and amendment
to the 2008 Annual Action Plan will be required. The reason for this has to do
with timeliness; it is quicker to use the 2008 funds than 2009. The due date for
submission of the plan is June 5, 2009 which accelerates our schedule.
Administrative and Planning costs allowable will be 10% of the entitlement. In
accordance with the City's Citizen Participation Plan, notices of two public
hearings on April 16, 2009 and April 21, 2009 were published in the Tri-City
Herald and La Voz Hispanic newspapers. At the April 16, 2009 meeting
presentations were heard for proposed projects. In summary, there were four
proposals received, two new projects were added for the Boys 8s Girls Club and
$10,000 for program administration.
Chairman Samuel questioned the reason behind the major change in the
proposal summary, in particular, the removal of projects for the Martin Luther
King Center.
Mrs. Pitman stated the Martin Luther King Center was considered for funding
from the Energy Efficiency Conservation Grant, another entitlement the City has
received.
Chairman Samuel asked if the Boys 8v Girls Club couldn't get funding
somewhere else.
Mrs. Pitman answered that it is easier for the City to get funding for the Martin
Luther King Center than it is for the Boys & Girls Club to get funded. The City
owns both buildings, but the Martin Luther King Center is operated by the City
and the Boys & Girls Club is not.
Chairman Samuel opened the hearing for public comment.
Ron McHenry, Vice-President Boys and Girls Club, 801 N. 18th Avenue, Pasco
represents the Boys and Girls Club of Benton-Franklin Counties made a brief
presentation regarding the proposed projects. He added that due to the
-6-
improvements made at their facility the Boys 8v Girls Club continues to provide
additional quality services to the children who attend.
Chairman Samuel questioned how many kids benefit from their program.
Mr. McHenry stated there are 225 members a day out of this facility.
Chairman Samuel asked Mr. McHenry to describe the necessity for the lighting
improvements and what would happen if they were not fixed.
Mr. McHenry stated the State has required the lighting to be updated due to the
type of lighting in the facility and for the safety of the children. The current
bulbs contain mercury and fluorescent dust that in the event they explode
would cause several small particles to rain down and would be hard to clean up.
They have removed some of the lighting fixtures which have decreased the
lighting. This proposal would replace the lighting fixtures.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing, after three calls and no response
the hearing was closed.
Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Cruz the Planning
Commission recommend the City Council accept Option 2 for a workshop item
on May 26, 2009 and action on June 1, 2009. The motion passed unanimously.
B. Preliminary Plat Casa Del Sol Div II (Fastrack) (South of
Sandifur Parkway) (MF# PP09-001)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Staff stated the applicant applied for preliminary plat approval for the Casa Del
Sol Division II subdivision. The plat contains 44.6 acres and is located south of
Sandifur Parkway between Road 44 and Road 52. The proposed plat includes
124 single-family lots with an average lot size of 10,379 sq. ft. The development
equates to 2.8 units per acre. The site is zoned R-S-1 (Residential Suburban
District) which allows for 1 unit for every 10,000 sq. ft. The proposed subdivision
was part of a larger development that was approved in 2002.
Staff reviewed the surrounding land use and zoning and other items in the
written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission.
Chairman Samuel asked if the proposed plat required any special conditions.
Staff stated one of the conditions recommended by the Engineering Department
required Road 52 and Sandifur Parkway be completed to City standards in
conjunction with the first phase of the development. These improvements would
include paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lighting and any required
underground utilities.
-7-
Chairman Samuel asked if it was standard practice that all utilities are
undergrounded in new subdivisions.
Staff stated yes.
Commissioner Anderson requested more insight on the road requirement that
Engineering has come up that is not customary.
Staff stated the Engineers may be trying to mirror or complete what they did on
the north side with the Northwest Commons development where the developer
was required to extend Sandifur from Road 52 to Road 44 with the first phase of
that subdivision. Typically street improvements are done in phases. In this case,
perhaps the Engineers felt it was important to get Sandifur Parkway completed
with the first phase to match the other side.
Commissioner Anderson stated he would was interested in what the developer
would have to say and if they would be willing to accept that the condition to
complete Sandifur Parkway with Phase 1.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing.
Jason Maddox, HDJ Design Group 6115 Burden Blvd. spoke on behalf of
Fastrack, Inc. He stated the original preliminary plat application had expired.
Mr. Maddox briefly explained the plat and his client's background in the plat.
Mr. Maddox stated the developer does not agree with Item #1 which requires
Sandifur Parkway to be built out in Phase 1. Those requirements upfront with
Phase 1 are not proportional to the development that has taken place. Phase 1
contains only 32 lots. Phase 1 does not directly access Sandifur Parkway; all
access is through Road 52. The request is not consistent with developments in
the past in which developers are not required to build all of the main roads
around the exteriors of the plats with the first phase of the development.
The developer has requested to build Road 52 up to Sandifur Parkway with
Phase 1. Then he would build Sandifur Parkway to Porto Lane with Phase 2.
Sandifur would be completed with Phase 3.
Mr. Maddox requested the fencing along Road 52 be consistent with the existing
fencing to avoid a patchwork of fencing along Road 52.
Chairman Samuel asked staff to comment on the fencing.
Staff stated the fence issue has been adjusted in the past to make
neighborhoods look more consistent with the same type of fencing on the same
side of the street.
Staff reminded the Commission that street improvements include not only the
road surface, but the storm drains, fire hydrants, street lights, block walls,
irrigation for the planting strip, the sod and trees for the planting strip. Staff
-8-
further explained that if the idea of phasing was considered the street
improvements should include the radius at street intersections
Commissioner Cruz stated he would like to hear from Engineering for the basis
of their original request in writing or a verbal explanation.
Mr. Maddox further stated Sandifur (the current segment from Rd 52 to Rd 44)
was constructed with two 12 feet lanes or a 12 foot lane and a 13 foot lane and
then a 3-4 foot shoulder. In his professional opinion, with the current traffic
Sandifur functions safely.
Commissioner Schouviller asked why vinyl fencing was not adequate, or what
was the reason for requiring the block wall.
Staff stated last year the City Council discussed the issue after receiving
recommendation from the Planning Commission. All new subdivision were to
use block fences because of durability concerns over vinyl or wood.
Chairman Samuel commented that wood fencing is not appealing with holes it
looks horrible.
Bill Wahler, 4809 Laredo Drive stated he lives nearby and he was concern about
lot sizes.
Mr. McDonald stated the lots would be consistent with the Casa Del Sol lots.
The subdivision would consist of lots that are 10,000 sq. ft.
Mr. Wahler recommended the fencing be vinyl to be consistent.
Mr. Wahler asked where the irrigation water in the development would come
from.
Staff stated there will not be new wells constructed and it would feed of the
current wells in the area.
Mr. Wahler further stated he is having noise issues with the current well and did
not want another well installed behind his property.
Mr. Wahler stated he has witnessed the area grow with a park and sidewalks
and stated the sidewalks are not being maintained at this time and look they
trashy with tumbleweeds, etc. He does not want to add curb, sidewalks and a
wall which would make two sides of the Sandifur look trashy with debris.
After three calls and no further response the public hearing was closed.
Mr. McDonald stated he would discuss with the Engineering Dept. regarding the
extension of Sandifur Road in the first Phase.
-9-
Commissioner Anderson stated he agreed with the developers' proposal for
Sandifur Parkway. He stated there was little or no traffic on Sandifur at this
time and there is no need to build that road at this time. Secondly, he is in favor
of keeping the fence consistent and then return to the standards of installing
brick walls. Finally, he stated he did not see a need to get information from the
Engineering Dept. and feels it is perfectly within their purview and their
capabilities to make this decision and recommends they adopt the conditions as
requested by the developer.
Commissioner Cruz stated he agrees with Commissioner Anderson except on
last item and would like Engineering to provide the necessary reasons for the
request of the building all of Sandifur Parkway with the first phase.
Commissioner Schouviller agreed with Commissioner Andersons' proposal.
Chairman Samuel agreed with Commissioner Andersons' proposal and further
they would like a memo which describes their reason for the condition.
Chairman Samuel stated the majority would prefer to see a memo from
Engineering.
Commissioner Anderson stated there is no compelling reason to request the
developer to build Sandifur as requested.
Chairman Samuel stated they would like to revise special condition #1 to state
that the road be built as requested by the developer. Item #4 would also need to
be revised to be consistent with the existing fence along Road 52.
Commissioner Little asked if it would be typical in future development to deviate
from the fence standards.
Staff explained the proposed development is a continuation of an existing
previously approved plat that already has vinyl fencing continuing up Rd 52
with that fencing will avoid mis-matching situation. With a new subdivision they
would start with a clean slate and there would be no reason to provide an
exception. Three rivers Crossing on Sandifur Parkway and Convention Drive is
an example of where an exception was made.
Chairman Samuel asked if staff had enough information to revise these special
conditions.
Mr. McDonald stated yes.
Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Hay to close the
public hearing on this preliminary plat application and initiate deliberations and
schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the
City Council for the June 18, 2009 meeting. The vote was unanimous.
la
C. Preliminary Plat Chapel Hill Div II (Liberty Bankers) (Woodbine
Road) (MF# PP09-002)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Staff stated the applicant has applied to reapprove the Chapel Hill Div II
preliminary plat. This site is 26.89 acres located west of Saratoga Lane and
north of the Franklin County Irrigation District canal. The applicant is proposing
to develop 94 single family lots with an average of 10,079 sq ft. which equates to
3.5 units per acre. The site is zoned R-1 (Low-Density Residential District) which
allows for 1 unit for every 7,200 sq ft. This subdivision was part of a larger
development that was approved in 2003 and has since expired. The
Comprehensive Plan indicates this site is intended for mixed residential
development (Single and Multi-Family development uses). The Comprehensive
Plan designation means 5-20 units per acre and the proposal falls below the end
of that scale.
Staff mailed notification to neighboring property owners within 300 ft of the
property and have received one response with concerns of the height of future
homes.
Chairman Samuel questioned if there are any special conditions in this request
that are not typical for a plat.
Staff commented Item #2 has language that is different than previous plats. All
corner lots shall contain easements for appropriate site distances. No fences,
utility vaults, or pedestals, etc. will not be allowed in this area. The easement
must be shown on the face of the final plat for each phase, which is a new
condition and was not included in the original preliminary plat.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing.
John Fetterhoff, HDJ Design Group spoke on behalf of the applicant. Mr.
Fetterhoff stated he has read through the conditions of approval and findings of
fact and has no objections to the request. MT-1 was the original applicant and
the new applicant is developing this area to market and sell this property. In
reference to the letter submitted the developer would be objectionable to any
restrictions on height requirements for this project.
W.A. Cramer, 6012 Woodbine Drive stated he submitted the letter and would
like to ask the Planning Commission to consider lowering the house heights of
this development to prevent blocking the view from his home. He stated when he
purchases his property; they were advertised as view lots and paid $5,000 -
$7,000 extra for a view lot.
Nolvia Salinas, 6306 Thistledown and 6311 Woodbine Drive states she
purchased these lots for the view. They moved here from the other side of the
41-
mountains and they enjoy the city. Her concerns are regarding the development
in her neighborhood. She states she used to see quail in her yard and now there
are none due to the construction. She questioned if there would be a park in the
neighborhood. She also mentioned the lots that are not developed are not kept
up; they have huge piles of dirt that blow onto their properties; the vacant lot is
covered with tumbleweeds and they blow into neighboring properties. She also
mentioned having issues with the building of a retaining wall.
Chairman Samuel directed staff to address Ms. Salinas' questions.
Staff stated there is land designated for a park. This includes a 5 acre tract
which will be built when the development of the area is filled with 3/4 of the lots
developed. The City would then hold a neighborhood meeting to discuss the
creation of the park. The site is located to the north of the plat adjacent to the
freeway.
Staff stated utilities are required to be built underground with the exception of a
pedestal/utility vault which protrudes above ground and are located periodically
throughout the neighborhood. They are typically placed near the common lot
line.
Staff stated maintenance of the common entrance monument/art features is the
responsibility of the property owners/developer. Property in the right-of-way is
maintained by money which is paid from the developer into a boulevard fund to
maintain that property.
Staff stated retaining walls are addressed during the building permit stage for
building homes. Home owners have the option to choose the height of their
retaining walls and it is not part of the infrastructure.
Chairman Samuel questioned staff on the height of homes in front of view lots.
Staff stated there is no view ordinance or view corridor ordinance within the
Pasco Municipal Code. The heights of homes are regulated by the zoning
regulations and the maximum height for this area is 25 feet.
Mr. Fetterhoff stated residents along Thistledown should be concerned with the
residents along Woodbine immediately on the south side and the development
inside this plat; there is an 8 foot drop from the lots on Woodbine down to the
next level of lots. There is up to a 16 foot drop in some areas. The lots have been
graded out for future development.
Staff stated the concern with the height of the houses would be mitigated
somewhat due to the fact that Woodbine is 8 feet or so below the next street.
Commissioner Little stated in regard to the first row of houses that are being
built, a subdivision off of Road 44 had a restriction that stated the first row of
houses had setbacks.
42
Staff stated yes those lots were deeper and the reason was due to the fact that
part of the lots were encompassed in the slope.
Stan Razey, 6112 Woodbine Drive states he was the first person to purchase
land on Woodbine Drive. He states he was led to believe there would be nothing
to block their view from their lot.
Commissioner Schouviller questioned Mr. Razey to estimate the difference in
elevation from his back lot to the lot below.
Mr. Razey stated it is estimated at 20 feet from the curb top down to the next
level.
Jim Lehrer, 7006 N. Fleming, Spokane, WA works for Liberty Bankers stated
their intent is to extend a plat that was approved. There is a 20 foot grade and
they are trying to preserve the value of an asset. There is a 5 acre piece of land
which is dedicated for a park. They do not have current ownership of that land
at this time and they are working with the previous developer to have that
deeded to the Park department.
Mr. Cramer further stated there is a lot of misconception on this lot height. He
lives on the corner of Woodbine and there is an 8 foot drop to the property to the
south.
Commissioner Anderson questioned Mr. Cramer if when he purchased his lot,
was he aware of plans to build below his lot.
Mr. Cramer stated none whatsoever.
Commissioner Anderson further commented to Mr. Cramer that this land was
previously platted and there was a lack of information provided to Mr. Cramer
from the developer. He further stated he is unsure the Planning Commission is
in a position to do what he is asking them to do by law. He suggests that if the
lot was represented as a view lot he may need to seek legal assistance on this
matter.
Staff stated height restriction limitations are within the zoning regulations and
they have a concomitant agreement provision that would allow conditions to be
placed on the development through that process. Unfortunately we are beyond
that stage. The land is zoned R-1 and R-1 regulations allow for heights of 25
feet.
Terry Ray, 6208 Woodbine Drive questioned if there is going to be a fence
developed around the canal to protect children.
Staff stated they are recommending an approval condition requiring the
developer to install a 6 ft. common fence all along the canal.
1a
Andrea Ray, 6208 Woodbine Drive followed up with the concern of lots being
developed around that area and there are lots of children that frequent the area.
She is concerned for the safety of the children.
Chairman Samuel questioned staff what is the required timeframe for a fence to
be built in the sequence of development.
Staff stated in this particular phase the condition requires the fence is built with
the construction of the infrastructure improvements. On the previous
development on the east side of Saratoga there was an agreement a fence would
be built with the houses and the fence would have to look similar the fencing in
the neighborhood. Staff further stated he would look into this matter and if
possible to require them to build it now, it will happen.
Steve Simmons, 6109 Woodbine Drive stated he understands legal action may
need to be sought regarding the view lots. He lives on the opposite side of the
street as the other parties present tonight and stated there are two-story homes
built on Thistledown and their balconies are almost ground level with backyards
on Thistledown. He questioned where the park would be located and the size of
the park.
Staff stated it is located near the highway and this site has been preapproved for
a park. All of the engineering work has been done for utilities and streets and it
is virtually impossible to relocate the park.
Ms. Salinas further suggested locating a 2 lot park closer to her home.
Chairman Samuel questioned Ms. Salinas if her main concern is the distance
from her home to the park.
Ms. Salinas stated the park is really far for kids to travel to that park. She stated
the multi-family developments are over crowding the area with kids and the
distance is too far and it is not safe even if a fence is built because if kids kick
the ball over the fence, most kids jump the fence to get their ball.
Andrea Bieren, 6216 Woodbine Drive questioned if the future lots are for single-
family or multi-family development and if duplexes would be built.
Staff stated the property is zoned for single-family homes which does not allow
for apartments.
Mr. Razey further stated when they looked at the plot they were only shown a
small area of the land.
Chairman Samuel questioned Mr. Razey if the he was under the impression this
property would not be developed.
Mr. Razey stated the developer stated it would be years before anything was
built.
14
Chairman Samuel questioned how many years ago that was stated.
Mr. Razey stated they bought their home three years ago.
After three calls for public comment and no further response, the hearing was
closed.
Commissioner Schouviller moved, seconded by Commissioner Little to close the
public hearing on this preliminary plat application and initiate deliberations and
schedule adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the
City Council for the June 18, 2009 meeting.
D. BRAC Plan Wagenaar Reserve Center Base Realignment
and Closure (BRAG) Redevelopment Plan (MF#
INFO 08-025)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Staff stated the Wagenaar center has been closed by an act of Congress and they
are streamlining their real estate holdings to make their program more efficient.
The City has taken over the role as the local redevelopment authority after the
Port of Pasco relinquished that authority due to a conflict of interest in May
2008. The process of developing a plan for redevelopment has begun and that
was done by gathering information on outreach to homeless providers as part of
the regulations for base realignment and closure. There have been public
meetings held and scenarios for possible reuses of the facility. The center is
located in the middle of an industrial zoned area which greatly influenced the
planning process. There were notices of interest submitted via newspaper
notification, mailings to surrounding property owners and affected agencies, it
has been posted on the City calendar and there is a webpage dedicated to the
Wagenaar Center.
There were three responses received. One response was received from Dayspring
Ministries which is a tax-exempt charitable organization which specializes in
outpatient drug treatment. Another response was received from the Northwest
Laborers' Training Trust Fund which train in construction craft laborers and
another response from the Port of Pasco which leases land for businesses.
There were no notices received from any direct homeless assistance providers
and this is noteworthy due to the fact the BRAC process is that they need to
make certain there is a balance between the needs of the community in terms of
commercial development and the homeless community. The average score for
the Dayspring Ministry was 50 on a scale of 100, Northwest Laborers Trust
scored 69 and the Port of Pasco scored 85 which provided the plan that best fit
the area and the needs of the community.
1S
The public hearing was opened, after three calls and no response the hearing
was closed.
Chairman Samuel questioned what the next step is for this to move forward.
Staff stated a formal vote from the Planning Commission would take place at the
June 18, 2009 meeting and then it will move forward to City Council. Upon
approval, it will be submitted to HUD for a balance determination and to the
military for a property disposal planning process which is anticipated for the fall
of 2009.
E. Rezone Road 76 and Court Annexation Area (MF# Z09-
003)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Staff stated on May 4, 2009 City Council adopted an Ordinance that annexed a
small area located in the vicinity of Road 76 and Court Street to the City. The
annexation area contains 41 acres and has 17 homes. The next step in the
annexation process is to determine the zoning designation. In the past, the
Planning Commission has considered surrounding development patterns along
with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan to help establish an appropriate
zoning district for annexation areas. Staff explained the area is surrounded by
County properties zoned RS-20 and RS-12. Staff recommended zoning the area
RS-12 which would allow some flexibility in creating future lots to cover the cost
of extending water and sewer service.
Commissioner Little asked if the City has made attempts to make the
annexation area a more square dimension.
Staff stated the boundaries follow property lines.
Chairman Samuel asked what the difference was between RS-12 and RS-20.
Staff stated the difference was in the minimum lot size, RS-12 (12,000) and RS-
20 (20,000).
Chairman Samuel stated there were a number of citizens who were concerned
with zoning at City Council and questioned staff on their recommendation.
Staff stated R-S-12 would allow property owners more flexibility for dividing
property in the future.
Commissioner Cruz stated the focus for the zoning should be to maintain urban
densities.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing, after 3 calls and no response, the
public hearing was closed.
Ira
Commissioner Cruz moved, seconded by Commissioner Hay to adopt the
findings of fact as contained in the staff report. The motion was unanimously
approved.
Commissioner Cruz further moved, seconded by Commissioner Hay based on
the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City
Council zone the Road 76 and Court Street Annexation Area to R-S-12. The
motion was unanimously approved.
OTHER BUSINESS:
With no further business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 9:36 pm.
David McDonald, Secretary
1'-
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: PP 09-001 APPLICANT: Fastrack, Inc.
HEARING DATE: 5/21/09 3515 Hovley Lane
ACTION DATE: 6/18/09 Pasco, WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT: Planned Density Preliminary Plat - Casa
Del Sol Division II (124-Lots)
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: The southwest quarter of Section 11, Township 9 North, Range 29
East, W.M., City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington, excepting
therefrom any portion lying south of the northerly lines of Casa Del Sol
Phase 3, as filed in Volume D of Plats, Page 302, and Casa Del Sol Phase
6, as filed in Volume D of Plats, Page 288, Franklin County, Washington.
General Location: South of Sandifur Parkway between Road 44 and
Road 52
Property Size: 44.6 Acres
Number of Lots Proposed: 124 single-family lots
Square Footage range of Lots: 7,934 sq. ft. to 20,996 sq. ft.
Average Lot Square Footage: 10,379 sq. ft.
2. ACCESS: The property has access from Sandifur Parkway, Road 52 and
Road 44.
3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site from the Casa
Del Sol development to the south.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-S-1 (Suburban) and has
been partially graded in preparation for development. Zoning and land
uses of the surrounding properties are as follows:
NORTH- R-S-1 farm circle/Northwest Commons subdivision
SOUTH- R-S-1 Casa Del Sol subdivision
EAST- R-S-1/PUD farm circle
WEST- R-1 Village of Pasco Heights subdivision (vacant & platted)
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is
intended for low density residential development. The Plan further
I
indicates low density residential development means 2 to 5 dwelling
units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future land use
section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II, page 17)
encourages development of lands designated for residential uses when or
where; sewer is available, land is suitable for home sites, and when there
is a market demand. Policy H-1-E encourages the advancement of home
ownership and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of
housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU-2 encourages
the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new
neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a
Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) in accordance with review
under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW.
ANALYSIS
The property in question was rezoned and granted preliminary plat approval for
single-family development in 2002. In the last five years the developer has
completed construction on the south half of the development. While some of
the engineering work has been completed for the north half, the infrastructure
improvements have not been completed.
The applicant has applied for a preliminary plat approval along with a Planned
Density Development designation. The original preliminary plat for the property
was approved with a Planned Density Development designation. The purpose of
the Planned Density Development designation process is to provide a degree of
flexibility for the layout of subdivisions and to encourage variety in housing
developments. The regulations do not permit the average overall density to
exceed that of the underlying zone. In this case the underlying zoning would
permit 145 single-family lots. The application is seeking approval for 124 lots.
The average lot size will be 10,379 square feet.
The proposal is essentially a continuation of the previously approved
development with four fewer lots than previously approved.
LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 124 lots with an average lot size
meeting the R-S-1 zoning requirements.
RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets that will be dedicated for
public use.
UTILITIES: The developer will be responsible for extending the water lines,
sewer lines and other utilities into the plat. A utility easement will be needed
along the first 10-15 feet of all lots. The final location and width of the
easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front
2
yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested
easements; therefore the front yard easements will not encroach upon the
buildable portions of the lots.
The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and
streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire
hydrants are located at street intersections and at a maximum of 600-foot
intervals and streetlights are located at street intersections and at 300-foot
intervals on residential streets.
STREET NAMES: The proposed street names match the names of streets in
the developed portions of Casa Del Sol. A few of the proposed street names
have already been used in surrounding developments. The names will need to
be changed prior to final plat approval.
IRRIGATION: The Municipal Code requires the installation of irrigation lines
as a part of infrastructure improvements.
WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for
subdivision approval. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City the
property owner/developer must pay a water-right fee of $1,500 per acre in lieu
thereof. The Public Works Director may waive the fee if the developer mixes a
soil additive in the ground that provides 30% retention of irrigation water. In
this case the developer previously provided the City with water rights and
irrigation well.
FINDINGS OF FACT
State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning
Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision
will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the
community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact":
Prevent Overcrowding: With an average lot size of 10,379 square feet the
proposed development will address the overcrowding concern by providing
manageable lots and usable open spaces. R-S-1 zoning requires a 20 foot front
yard set back and no more than 40 percent lot coverage providing for open
space on the lots.
3
Parks, Open Space and Schools: The Casa Del Sol development previously
provided 5 acres for a neighborhood park. The park is located on Laredo Drive
half a block south of Casa Del Sol Division II. An elementary school site has
been purchased at the northwest corner of Road 60 and Sandifur Parkway. The
eight acre site is now owned by the School District. The School District has
also purchased a 40 acre parcel at Road 52 and Power Line Road for a future
middle school.
Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The plat is laid out to effectively
utilize the site consistent with surrounding residential development. The site is
within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary and designated for residential
development in the Comprehensive Plan. The site is currently zoned for single-
family residential development.
Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat provides connections to the
community by way of local access streets. Sidewalks are required to be
installed on all streets when homes are built.
Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: Municipal water and sewer lines
will be extended to the plat from nearby lines. All utility lines will be sized and
installed to meet the standard specifications of the City.
Provision of Housing for State Residents: This preliminary plat will provide
124 lots for the construction of new single-family dwellings for Pasco residents.
Adequate Air and Light: The lot sizes and maximum lot coverage limitations
will assure that adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot.
Proper Access & Travel: Streets in the plat will be paved and developed to City
standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot. Connections to
the community will be provided by local streets. The preliminary plat was
submitted to the Transit Authority for review. No comments were received from
the Transit Authority.
Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive Plan designates
the site for low-density residential development. Policies of the Plan encourage
the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a
variety of housing for residents.
Other Findings: (list additional findings as appropriate)
1. The site is within the Pasco UGA.
2. The site is currently vacant.
3. The property is zoned R-S-1 which is identical to the zoning of the
development to the south.
4
4. Comprehensive Plan Policy H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a
variety of housing options for residents of the community.
5. Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-2 supports the protection and
enhancement of the established character of viable residential
neighborhoods.
6. The Comprehensive Plan (TR-1-G) encourages the interconnection of
neighborhood streets.
7. Future school sites have been purchased near the proposed plat.
8. Each lot developed within the I-182 corridor is required by code to pay a
traffic mitigation fee.
9. The proposed plat was part of a plat that was previously approved by the
City.
10. The original Casa Del Sol subdivision and the Desert Sunset subdivision
are located to the south.
11. The Casa Del Sol Park has previously been dedicated and developed.
12. Utilities have been extended to the site.
13. The proposed subdivision will be constructed following the engineering
standards and specifications of the City.
14. The proposed plat will allow the interconnection and looping of utilities.
15. Streets in the proposed subdivision will connect to existing and proposed
neighborhood streets.
16. The site contains 44.6 acres with 124 lots, equaling 0.36 lots/units per
acre.
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed plat the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
(P.M.C. 26.24.070) therefrom as to whether or not:
(1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general
welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public
ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops,
schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for
students and other public needs;
The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the
Municipal Code and standard specifications of the City Engineering
Department. These standards were designed to ensure the public health,
safety and general welfare of the community are secured. The standards
include sidewalks for safe walking conditions. These standards also
include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and
requirements for parks (a park has already been built in the
neighborhood). This preliminary plat has been forwarded to the Franklin
County PUD, the Pasco School District and Ben-Franklin Transit Authority
5
for review and comment. The School District has purchased nearby sites
for an elementary school and a middle school.
(2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land
use patterns in the area;
The proposed plat is a continuation of an existing and previously approved
residential subdivision (Casa Del Sol).
(3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text
of the Comprehensive Plan;
The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low density
residential development. Low density development is described as 2 to 5
single-family units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The policies of the
plan encourage the advancement of home ownership (H-1-E). Plan Goal H-
2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for
residents of the community.
(4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any
applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council;
Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in
the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to
the policies, maps, and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three
above.
(5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the
subdivision regulations.
The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated
and discussed in the staff analysis and findings of fact. The findings of
fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes
of the subdivision regulations.
(6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed
subdivision.
The proposed plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all
City standards designed to insure the health, safety and welfare of the
community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through
development of this plat. These factors will ensure the public use and
interest is served.
6
PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
See Alternates # 1 and # 2 attached
RECCOMENDATION
MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and
conclusions as contained in the June 18, 2009 staff report.
MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of fact
and conclusions, as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend
the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Casa Del Sol
Division II with the condition as listed in Alternate # attached
to the June 18, 2009 staff report:
7
ALTERNATE # 1
PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
Per Planning Commission Instructions
1) At the time lots are developed, all abutting roads and utilities shall be
developed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This
includes, but is not limited to: water, irrigation and sewer lines, street
paving, curb, gutter, street lights, and storm water retention.
Sidewalks must be installed no later than the time each lot is
developed with a house. The handicapped accessible pedestrian
ramps must be completed with the street and curb improvements
prior to final plat approval. All existing and proposed utilities must be
installed underground by the developer at the developer's expense. All
of Road 52 plus the radius and a 100 foot transition east on Sandifur
Parkway must be completed to City standards with the first phase of
the development. Sandifur Parkway must be completed 100 feet east
of Porto Lane with Phase 2 and the balance of Sandifur Parkway to
Road 44 must be completed with Phase 3.
2) No fences, utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be
allowed to obstruct sight distances at intersections.
3) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "traffic mitigation fee" per
the Municipal Code.
4) The developer shall install a common estate type fence/wall six feet in
height along the rear line of all lots abutting Road 52, Sandifur
Parkway and Road 44. The fence shall be constructed of masonry
block to match the fencing on the north side of Sandifur Parkway. The
City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property
owners adjoining said fence/wall shall be responsible for payment of
all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep of the fencing/wall.
These fencing/wall requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of
the final plat(s).
5) The common estate fence on Road 52 shall match the existing vinyl
fence on Road 52 until the Williams Pipeline easement. The masonry
block fence shall start on Road 52 at the intersection with Williams
Pipeline easement and shall continue to the north line of lot 40 Casa
Del Sol Phase 6.
6) The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with
construction inspection and plan review service expenses incurred by
the City Engineering Department.
7) The developer will be required to provide a deposit to the City of Pasco
to ensure that record drawings of the constructed utilities are created.
A topographic survey of the constructed utilities must be performed.
The topographic survey shall include manhole lids and sewer invert
elevations, location of sewer stubs, water valves, water meters,
irrigation valves, irrigation services, storm water catch basins, street
lights, fire hydrants, monuments and other pertinent information
deemed necessary, to the satisfaction of the City of Pasco. The
developer will be required to coordinate the efforts of their surveyor
and engineer to create records drawings to the satisfaction of the City
of Pasco.
8) The developer shall ensure active and ongoing dust and litter
abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision
and construction of the houses thereon.
9) The final plat shall contain 10 to 15 foot utility easements parallel to
all streets as required by utility providers.
10) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat drawings shall
utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. Said
datum shall be identified on the drawings for each submittal.
11) A note shall appear on the final plat for any phase containing the gas
main line explaining that there is a 20 inch diameter, pressurized
natural gas pipeline located within the boundaries of the plat.
12) Williams Pipeline currently has an easement for a natural gas pipeline
through the northwest corner of the proposed subdivision.
Construction of any utilities will require preapproval from the
Williams Corporation to cross this easement. All public utilities
passing through this easement must be continuously sleeved to a
minimum of 10 feet beyond the easement lines.
13) Fencing is not permitted within the Williams Pipeline easement. A
note shall appear on the final plat of any phase containing this
easement indicating this restriction.
14) The overhead power lines along Road 52 must be moved underground
with the construction of the first phase of this development.
15) The final plat shall contain the following Franklin County Public
Utility District statement: "The individual or company making
improvements on a lot or lots of this plat is responsible for providing
and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction
boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution
system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or
company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and
will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction
and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat."
16) All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the
placement of yard fencing shall be identified by lot number in the
notes on the face of the final plat(s).
17) All storm water must be disposed of through means approved by the
City. All methods utilized to capture and dispose of storm water must
be in accordance with current City Codes and Standard
Specifications, and applicable Washington State Law.
18) The developer shall be responsible for installing landscaping in the
unimproved right-of-way on Road 52, Sandifur Parkway, and Road
44. This landscaping will consist of lawn and Spring Snow Crab apple
trees or approved equal. The trees shall be spaced at 50-foot intervals.
No trees will be planted within 25 feet of a street light. The
landscaping must include an irrigation system. All landscape plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Engineering and
Community and Administrative Services departments prior to
installation.
19) Lots abutting Road 52, Sandifur Parkway and Road 44 shall not have
direct access to those streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of
deed restrictions or statements on the face of the final plat(s).
20) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area
maintenance fee" of $375 per lot upon issuance of building permits
for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to for the
maintenance of the landscaping along Road 52, Sandifur Parkway
and Road 44. The City shall accept maintenance responsibility for the
landscaping abutting said streets at such time as all maintenance fees
for all lots in each division abutting said streets have been paid. The
developer and or subsequent developers, home builders or assigns
shall be responsible for all maintenance until such time as all fees
have been paid to the City.
21) Irrigation mainlines must be installed throughout the entire proposed
plat of a size sufficient (minimum 4 inch diameter) to service each and
every currently proposed/future lot pursuant to PMC 26.04.116.
Additional mainlines, as directed by the City Engineer may be
required to be installed. The developer must install a properly
designed irrigation system with stubs to all lots in the subdivision for
future irrigation needs. All easements/rights of way necessary to
convey an irrigation system to and through the proposed plat must be
conveyed to the City of Pasco. The irrigation lines shall run in
easements/rights of way as directed by the City Engineer.
22) All streets are to be developed to City standards and/or as directed by
the City Engineer. Street grades for all arterial and collector roads
shall not exceed 6 percent. Interior local access street grades shall not
exceed 10 percent. Approaches to intersecting interior streets shall
not exceed 2 percent and any street intersecting an arterial or
collector street shall be zero (0) percent coming out of the toe of the
arterial/collector street slope. All temporary streets will be required to
have a paved turn around (2 inch pavement on 4 inches of rock base)
at the end of the street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
23) All water lines must be extended through the length of each proposed
plat. All water lines will be required to be looped with the existing City
of Pasco water system. A deposit is required for the removal of any
temporary loops installed by the developer. The deposit must include
the cost of removing the temporary piping, replacing damaged curb,
gutter and sidewalk, and a curb to curb replacement of all pavement
for at least 10 feet on both sides of the temporary line that was
removed. No water valves or meter boxes are to be located in any
easements or walkways.
24) Any and all utilities must be located as directed by the City Engineer.
This shall include but not be limited to gas, phone, power, cable and
all other utilities located within or adjoining this preliminary plat. Any
existing utilities that present difficulties shall be relocated at the
developer's expense, pursuant to the City Engineer's direction. All
utility plans, including the above mentioned, are required to be
submitted to the City of Pasco prior to subdivision approval.
25) The final plat(s) must contain the following statement: "Irrigation
service lines are currently available to lots within this plat; however,
water for the irrigation system may not currently be available. The
City of Pasco is constructing its irrigation infrastructure on an
ongoing basis. The use of the system will become available as time
and resources permit the expansion and connection of new systems to
the existing irrigation supply". This statement must appear on all
pages of said final plat(s).
26) Street lighting must be as directed by the City Engineer. Residential
street lights are typically installed every 300 feet and collector/arterial
street lights are installed every 150 feet.
27) Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review for
any phase of development the developer must enter into a Storm
Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer will be
responsible to obtain the signatures of all parties required on the
agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin
County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the
agreement must be presented to the City of Pasco at the first intake
meeting for construction plans for each phase of development.
28) The developer will be required to conform to all conditions set forth in
the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement including, but not limited
to, regular cleaning and maintenance of all streets, gutters, catch
basins and catch basin protection systems. Cleaning shall occur on a
regular basis to ensure that no excess build up of sand, trash, grass
clippings, weeds or other debris occurs in any portion of the streets,
gutters, or storm water collection facilities. Cleaning and upkeep of
the streets, gutters, and storm water collection facilities must be to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer will be responsible
to operate and maintain the storm drain system in accordance with
the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement for a period of 5 years from
the date of final plat approval for each phase or until the system is
accepted by the City of Pasco whichever is less. The City of Pasco's
acceptance of construction plans for subsequent phases of the
subdivision will be contingent on the developer satisfying all
requirements of the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement.
29) The developer will be required to comply with the City of Pasco Civil
Plan Review process. A copy of the requirements for the civil plan
review process is available from the City Engineering Department. All
construction plans must substantially conform to the approved
preliminary plans submitted with the preliminary plat.
ALTERNATE # 2
PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
with
Engineering Department Recommendations
1) At the time lots are developed, all abutting roads and utilities shall be
developed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This
includes, but is not limited to: water, irrigation and sewer lines,
streets, street lights, and storm water retention. Sidewalks must be
installed no later than the time each lot is developed with a house.
The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps must be completed
with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. All
existing and proposed utilities must be installed underground by the
developer at the developer's expense. Road 52 and Sandifur Parkway
must be completed to City standards in conjunction with the first
phase of development. This shall include, but not be limited to:
paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks, street lighting and any required
underground utilities.
2) Lots at street intersections or that would otherwise have sight
distance restrictions must contain easements for appropriate sight
distances. No fences, utility vaults or pedestals, or other obstructions
will be allowed in this area. The easements must appear on the face of
the final plat for each phase.
3) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "traffic mitigation fee" per
the Municipal Code.
4) The developer shall install a common estate type fence/wall six feet in
height along the rear line of all lots abutting Road 52, Sandifur
Parkway and Road 44. The fence shall be constructed of block to
match the fencing on the north side of Sandifur Parkway. The City
may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners
adjoining said fence/wall shall be responsible for payment of all costs
associated with maintenance and upkeep of the fencing/wall. These
fencing/wall requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the
final plat(s).
5) The common estate fence on Road 52 shall match the existing vinyl
fence on Road 52 until the Williams Pipeline easement. The masonry
block fence shall start on Road 52 at the intersection with Williams
Pipeline easement and shall continue to the north line of lot 40 Casa
Del Sol Phase 6.
6) The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with
construction inspection and plan review service expenses incurred by
the City Engineering Department.
7) The developer will be required to provide a deposit to the City of Pasco
to ensure that record drawings of the constructed utilities are created.
A topographic survey of the constructed utilities must be performed.
The topographic survey shall include manhole lids and sewer invert
elevations, location of sewer stubs, water valves, water meters,
irrigation valves, irrigation services, storm water catch basins, street
lights, fire hydrants, monuments and other pertinent information
deemed necessary, to the satisfaction of the City of Pasco. The
developer will be required to coordinate the efforts of their surveyor
and engineer to create records drawings to the satisfaction of the City
of Pasco.
8) The developer shall ensure active and ongoing dust and litter
abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision
and construction of the houses thereon.
9) The final plat shall contain 10 to 15 foot utility easements parallel to
all streets as required by utility providers.
10) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat drawings shall
utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. Said
datum shall be identified on the drawings for each submittal.
11) A note shall appear on the final plat for any phase containing the gas
main line explaining that there is a 20 inch diameter, pressurized
natural gas pipeline located within the boundaries of the plat.
12) Williams Pipeline currently has an easement for a natural gas pipeline
through the northwest corner of the proposed subdivision.
Construction of any utilities will require preapproval from the
Williams Corporation to cross this easement. All public utilities
passing through this easement must be continuously sleeved to a
minimum of 10 feet beyond the easement lines.
13) Fencing is not permitted within the Williams Pipeline easement. A
note shall appear on the final plat of any phase containing this
easement indicating this restriction.
14) The overhead power lines along Road 52 must be moved underground
with the construction of the first phase of this development.
15) The final plat shall contain the following Franklin County Public
Utility District statement: "The individual or company making
improvements on a lot or lots of this plat is responsible for providing
and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction
boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution
system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or
company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and
will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction
and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat."
16) All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the
placement of yard fencing shall be identified by lot number in the
notes on the face of the final plat(s).
17) All storm water must be disposed of through means approved by the
City. All methods utilized to capture and dispose of storm water must
be in accordance with current City Codes and Standard
Specifications, and applicable Washington State Law.
18) The developer shall be responsible for installing landscaping in the
unimproved right-of-way on Road 52, Sandifur Parkway, and Road
44. This landscaping will consist of lawn and Spring Snow Crab apple
trees or approved equal. The trees shall be spaced at 50-foot intervals.
No trees will be planted within 25 feet of a street light. The
landscaping must include an irrigation system. All landscape plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the City's Engineering and
Community and Administrative Services departments prior to
installation.
19) Lots abutting Road 52, Sandifur Parkway and Road 44 shall not have
direct access to those streets. Access shall be prohibited by means of
deed restrictions or statements on the face of the final plat(s).
20) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "common area
maintenance fee" of $375 per lot upon issuance of building permits
for homes. These funds shall be placed in a fund and used to for the
maintenance of the landscaping along Road 52, Sandifur Parkway
and Road 44. The City shall accept maintenance responsibility for the
landscaping abutting said streets at such time as all maintenance fees
for all lots in each division abutting said streets have been paid. The
developer and or subsequent developers, home builders or assigns
shall be responsible for all maintenance until such time as all fees
have been paid to the City.
21) Irrigation mainlines must be installed throughout the entire proposed
plat of a size sufficient (minimum 4 inch diameter) to service each and
every currently proposed/future lot pursuant to PMC 26.04.116.
Additional mainlines, as directed by the City Engineer may be
required to be installed. The developer must install a properly
designed irrigation system with stubs to all lots in the subdivision for
future irrigation needs. All easements/rights of way necessary to
convey an irrigation system to and through the proposed plat must be
conveyed to the City of Pasco. The irrigation lines shall run in
easements/rights of way as directed by the City Engineer.
22) All streets are to be developed to City standards and/or as directed by
the City Engineer. Street grades for all arterial and collector roads
shall not exceed 6 percent. Interior local access street grades shall not
exceed 10 percent. Approaches to intersecting interior streets shall
not exceed 2 percent and any street intersecting an arterial or
collector street shall be zero (0) percent coming out of the toe of the
arterial/collector street slope. All temporary streets will be required to
have a paved turn around (2 inch pavement on 4 inches of rock base)
at the end of the street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
23) All water lines must be extended through the length of each proposed
plat. All water lines will be required to be looped with the existing City
of Pasco water system. A deposit is required for the removal of any
temporary loops installed by the developer. The deposit must include
the cost of removing the temporary piping, replacing damaged curb,
gutter and sidewalk, and a curb to curb replacement of all pavement
for at least 10 feet on both sides of the temporary line that was
removed. No water valves or meter boxes are to be located in any
easements or walkways.
24) Any and all utilities must be located as directed by the City Engineer.
This shall include but not be limited to gas, phone, power, cable and
all other utilities located within or adjoining this preliminary plat. Any
existing utilities that present difficulties shall be relocated at the
developer's expense, pursuant to the City Engineer's direction. All
utility plans, including the above mentioned, are required to be
submitted to the City of Pasco prior to subdivision approval.
25) The final plat(s) must contain the following statement: "Irrigation
service lines are currently available to lots within this plat; however,
water for the irrigation system may not currently be available. The
City of Pasco is constructing its irrigation infrastructure on an
ongoing basis. The use of the system will become available as time
and resources permit the expansion and connection of new systems to
the existing irrigation supply". This statement must appear on all
pages of said final plat(s).
26) Street lighting must be as directed by the City Engineer. Residential
street lights are typically installed every 300 feet and collector/arterial
street lights are installed every 150 feet.
27) Prior to the City of Pasco accepting construction plans for review for
any phase of development the developer must enter into a Storm
Water Maintenance Agreement with the City. The developer will be
responsible to obtain the signatures of all parties required on the
agreement and to have the agreement recorded with the Franklin
County Auditor. The original signed and recorded copy of the
agreement must be presented to the City of Pasco at the first intake
meeting for construction plans for each phase of development.
28) The developer will be required to conform to all conditions set forth in
the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement including, but not limited
to, regular cleaning and maintenance of all streets, gutters, catch
basins and catch basin protection systems. Cleaning shall occur on a
regular basis to ensure that no excess build up of sand, trash, grass
clippings, weeds or other debris occurs in any portion of the streets,
gutters, or storm water collection facilities. Cleaning and upkeep of
the streets, gutters, and storm water collection facilities must be to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer will be responsible
to operate and maintain the storm drain system in accordance with
the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement for a period of 5 years from
the date of final plat approval for each phase or until the system is
accepted by the City of Pasco whichever is less. The City of Pasco's
acceptance of construction plans for subsequent phases of the
subdivision will be contingent on the developer satisfying all
requirements of the Storm Water Maintenance Agreement.
29) The developer will be required to comply with the City of Pasco Civil
Plan Review process. A copy of the requirements for the civil plan
review process is available from the City Engineering Department. All
construction plans must substantially conform to the approved
preliminary plans submitted with the preliminary plat.
Item:V'C'H'ty Preliminary Plat Casa
Applicant:
Map File 09-001
----------
a WE
We a I N
. f
�s. lam m m ■0 ■■MEN
1■■ lli
Me mmm"I&I
- ■�■■■®��■�1 •
l I 14i
'�► ■ _ i " �■ iii `.
A ate. '�i�"' ; J ■ —
f M! J � E
WWWWOW
■ _
Land Item: Preliminary Plat Casa Del Sol Div 1- 1
Use Applicant: Fastrack Inc. Q
Map File # :
esidential—,41
County)
:Tzi ri Vacan
1 _
1
- D 0 - -
RON
IN N
IN 14 814 1
i ■ ■ ■���I ♦ ■ ���■1111111■ ■ 1 ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ �
�■ ■. ■. ■�►� ♦�♦♦ ■ mom������■� Imo■■ ■■■■■■■ - ■■■■■■■■■■■ �■
■••■��,� ♦� 1�� �■ ■■■■■■■■ ■SOME■■■■■■■ ■���
ii �����j ♦♦ ♦� 1��■ ■ • ■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■`
1N11� ♦ ♦♦♦ ����/�1�■ ■ ■� ■■■■MOSS ■■MOM■■■■■■■
�■ �� ♦� ♦ ♦�� �.���■ ■■ ■ ■�II��IIIIII�� ■ME■M■■EN■ ■n NONE���■■ �■ �I
iI� �� � �i ��%r1� ■■ ■ ■ �11��11��1111� �f �f � f �
Item:Zoning A Preliminary Plat I Del Sol
1 cant: Fastrack Q
Map File # : PP 09-001
M—
moll
���IIIIII�
I■ ■■ ■■ 1 WIN• \�►\IS IS\\
IN
NOW IN
�■ ■� ■� ■III ♦♦ ■ ■ ■ ■��■■■■■� ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■
�• •■ ■■
moll ����■ ■ NOON■■NONE■ ■
■■ ■■ ����� ♦♦♦� ■ ` ■■■■■■■■■t ■
♦ ♦ ■ ���������■■ Imo■■ NOON■■■ - ■■ENN■■■■■■ ■
■ NOON■■ ♦♦ ♦���■ . ������■���� ■■��/��■■ NOON■■ ; ■■■NON■■■■■ ■■
�■ NOON■I �� �■ ; ��������������■ it ■■■■■■■■■ NOON■■■■E■1 ■
iN
soon■��� ♦ ��� 1■ ������������ NOON■■ ■NOON■■■O■■■
ii �����j ♦♦ ♦� 1��■ ■ NOON■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■`
�■ 1111 ♦♦ ♦�♦� �■ ■ ■��I��������� NOON■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■
MEN
0 OEM MEN MEN
IN
_ ♦ III..■■■�■��� - • •
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: PP 09-002 APPLICANT: Liberty Bankers
HEARING DATE: 5/21/09 7006 N. Fleming Street
ACTION DATE: 6/18/09 Spokane, WA 99208
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: PRELIMINARY PLAT: Preliminary Plat-Chapel Hill Division II
94-Lots
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: The project site is generally located south of Woodbine Dr and east
of Saratoga Lane (SW 1/4 of Sec 15, T 9N, R 29 E, lying northerly of the
FCID irrigation canal except Chapel Hill Phase 1 and except Parcel #
117-430-147).
General Location: West of Saratoga Lane and north of the FCID canal
Property 26.89 Acres
Number of Lots Proposed: 94 single-family lots
Square Footage range of Lots: 7,638 sq. ft. to 15,508 sq. ft.
Average Lot Square Footage: 10,079 sq. ft.
2. ACCESS: The property has access from Aintree Drive, Woodbine Drive
and Saratoga Lane.
3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (Low-Density
Residential) and was graded with the construction of the first phase of
the Chapel Hill development. Zoning and land use of the surrounding
properties are as follows:
NORTH- R-1 & R-3 Chapel Hill Phase I (SFD's) 8s the Crossings at Chapel
Hill (MFD's)
SOUTH- R-S-20 Single-family dwellings located in the County
EAST- R-1/Chapel Hill Phase 3 (single-family lots)
WEST- R-S-20 Single-family dwellings in the County & R-T in the City
S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan indicates the site is
intended for mixed residential development (single-family 8s multi-family
uses). The Plan further indicates mixed residential development means 5
1
to 20 dwelling units per acre. The criteria for allocation under the future
land use section of Volume II of the Comprehensive Plan (Vol. II, pg. 17)
encourages development of lands designated for residential uses when or
where; sewer is available, land is suitable for home sites, and when there
is a market demand. Policy H-1-E encourages the advancement of home
ownership and Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of
housing options for residents of the community. Goal LU-2 encourages
the maintenance of established neighborhoods and the creation of new
neighborhoods that are safe and enjoyable places to live.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a
Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) in accordance with review
under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW.
ANALYSIS
The property in question was rezoned and granted preliminary plat approval for
single-family development in 2003. In the last five years the developer has
completed portions of the construction on the multi-family and single-family
Chapel Hill development. Construction design work for the proposed site was
completed when the lots to the north were developed. At that time the site was
graded and the street locations were established.
The applicant has applied for a preliminary plat approval to allow the
remaining 94 lots west of Saratoga Lane to be developed as previously
approved.
The proposal is essentially a continuation of the previously approved
development.
LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 94 lots with an average lot size
exceeding the R-1 zoning requirements.
RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have frontage on streets that will be dedicated.
UTILITIES: The developer will be responsible for extending the water lines,
sewer lines and other utilities into the plat. A utility easement will be needed
along the first 10-15 feet of all lots. The final location and width of the
easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front
yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested
easements; therefore the front yard easements will not encroach upon the
buildable portions of the lots.
The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and
streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire
hydrants are located at street intersections and at a maximum of 600-foot
2
intervals and streetlights are located at street intersections at 300-foot
intervals on residential streets.
STREET NAMES: The proposed street names are consistent with the names of
streets in the remainder of the Chapel Hill development.
IRRIGATION: The municipal code requires the installation of irrigation lines
as a part of infrastructure improvements.
WATER RIGHTS: The assignment of water rights is a requirement for
subdivision approval. If no water rights are available to transfer to the City, the
property owner/developer must pay a water right fee of $1,500 per acre in lieu
thereof. The Public Works Director may waive the fee if the developer mixes a
soil additive in the ground that provides 30% retention of irrigation water. The
developers have previously dedicated the water rights and irrigation well.
FINDINGS OF FACT
State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal Code require the Planning
Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision
will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the
community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact":
Prevent Overcrowding: With an average lot size of 10,079 square feet, the
proposed development will address the overcrowding concern by providing
manageable lots and usable open spaces. R-1 zoning requires a 20 foot front
yard set back and no more than 40 percent lot coverage providing for open
space on the lots.
Parks Opens Space/Schools: The proposed preliminary plat was sent to the
Pasco School District for comment and review. The neighborhood park for this
plat was identified during the previous platting review process. The park site is
located at the intersection of Saratoga Lane and Chapel Hill Boulevard.
Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The plat is laid out to effectively
utilize the site consistent with surrounding residential development. The site is
within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. The proposed plat is a continuation
of a previously approved development.
Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat provides connections to the
community by way of local access streets. Sidewalks are required to be
installed when homes are built.
3
Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: Municipal water and sewer lines
will be extended to the plat from nearby lines. All utility lines will be sized and
installed to meet the standard specification of the City.
Provision of Housing for State Residents: This preliminary plat will provide
94 lots for the construction of new dwellings for Pasco residents.
Adequate Air and Light: The lot sizes and maximum lot coverage limitations
will assure the adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot.
Proper Access & Travel: Access streets in the plat will be paved and developed
to City standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot.
Connections to the community will be provided by local streets. The
preliminary plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review. No
comments were received from the Transit Authority.
Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive plan designates
the site for mixed residential development. Policies of the plan encourage the
advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a
variety of housing of residents.
Other Findings: (list additional findings as appropriate)
• The property is zoned R-1 which is identical to the zoning for other
phases of the Chapel Hill development.
• Single-family dwellings are located to the south and west in the County.
• The Comprehensive Plan encourages the interconnection of
neighborhood streets.
• Streets in the proposed subdivision will connect to existing and proposed
neighborhood streets.
• The proposed plat will allow the interconnection and looping of utilities.
• The site is currently vacant.
• The site is within the Pasco UGA.
• The proposed plat was part of a plat that was previously approved by the
City.
• Each lot developed within the I-182 corridor is required by code to pay a
traffic mitigation fee.
• Comprehensive Plan Policy H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a
variety of housing options for residents of the community.
• Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-2 supports the protection and
enhancement of the established character of viable residential
neighborhoods.
4
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed plat the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
(P.M.C. 26.24.070) there from as to whether or not:
(1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general
welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public
ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops,
schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for
students and other public needs;
The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the
municipal code and standard specifications of the City Engineering
department. These standards were designed to ensure the public health,
safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These
standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer
service and funding for park lands. This preliminary plat has been
forwarded to the Franklin County PUD, the Pasco School District and Ben-
Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment.
(2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land
use patterns in the area;
The proposed plat is a continuation of an existing and previously approved
residential subdivision (Chapel Hill).
(3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text
of the Comprehensive Plan;
The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for mixed
residential development. Mixed residential development is described as 5
to 20 dwelling units per acre in the Comprehensive Plan. The policies of the
plan encourage the advancement of home ownership (H-1-E). Plan Goal H-
2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for
residents of the community.
(4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any
applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council;
Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in
the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to
the policies, maps, and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three
above.
5
(5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the
subdivision regulations.
The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated
and discussed in the staff analysis and findings of fact. The findings of
fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes
of the subdivision regulations.
(6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed
subdivision.
The proposed plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all
City standards designed to insure the health, safety and welfare of the
community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through
development of this plat. These factors will ensure the public use and
interest is served.
PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
1) At the time lots are developed, all abutting roads and utilities shall be
developed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This
includes, but is not limited to water, irrigation and sewer lines,
streets, street lights, and storm water retention. Sidewalks must be
installed no later than the time each lot is developed with a house.
The handicapped accessible pedestrian ramps must be completed
with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. All
existing and proposed utilities must be installed underground by the
developer at the developer's expense.
2) No fences, utility vaults, pedestals, or other obstructions will be
allowed to obstruct sight distances at intersections.
3) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "traffic mitigation fee" per
the Municipal Code.
4) The developer shall install a common Estate type fence/wall 6 feet in
height along the rear line of all lots abutting the Franklin County
Irrigation District Canal Right of Way. Property owners adjoining said
fence/wall shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated
with maintenance and upkeep of the fencing/wall. These
fencing/wall requirements shall be noted clearly on the face of the
final plat(s).
5) The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with
construction inspection and plan review service expenses incurred by
the City of Pasco Engineering Department.
6
6) The developer/property owner must dedicate the five acre park site on
Chapel Hill Boulevard to the City when building permits have been
issued for 60 lots in Chapel Hill Division 2. The public right-of-way
improvements (curb, cutter, sidewalk etc) on Chapel Hill Boulevard
fronting the park site must be constructed to city standards prior to
park dedication. These improvements shall include a sewer, water and
an irrigation stub. Building permits will not be issued for more than
60 lots in the plat until the park site has been improved and
dedicated. The property owner must enter into a park dedication and
improvement agreement with the City of Pasco specifying the terms
and conditions of the park dedication. No construction drawings will
be approved for any phase of Chapel Hill Division 2 until the park
dedication agreement is signed and recorded.
7) The developer/builder shall pay the City a park fee of $300 per lot
upon issuance of building permits for homes.
8) The developer will be required to provide a deposit to the City of Pasco
to ensure that record drawings of the constructed utilities are created.
A topographic survey of the constructed utilities must be performed.
The topographic survey shall include manhole lids and sewer invert
elevations, location of sewer stubs, water valves, water meters,
irrigation valves, irrigation services, storm water catch basins, street
lights, fire hydrants, monuments and other pertinent information
deemed necessary, to the satisfaction of the City of Pasco. The
developer will be required to coordinate the efforts of their surveyor
and engineer to create records drawings to the satisfaction of the City
of Pasco.
9) The developer shall ensure active and ongoing dust and litter
abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision
and construction of the houses thereon.
10) The final plat shall contain 10 to 15 foot utility easements parallel to
all streets as required by utility providers.
11) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat drawings shall
utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. Said
datum shall be identified on the drawings for each submittal.
12) The final plat shall contain the following Franklin County Public
Utility District statement: "The individual or company making
improvements on a lot or lots of this plat is responsible for providing
and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction
boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution
system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or
company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and
will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction
and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat."
7
13) All storm water must be disposed of through a storm system and
collection ponds. All methods utilized to capture and dispose of storm
water must be in accordance with current City Codes and Standard
Specifications, and applicable Washington State Law.
14) Irrigation mainlines must be installed throughout the entire proposed
plat of a size sufficient (minimum 4 inch diameter) to service each and
every currently proposed/future lot pursuant to PMC 26.04.116.
Additional mainlines, as directed by the City Engineer may be
required to be installed. The developer must install a properly
designed irrigation system with stubs to all lots in the subdivision for
future irrigation needs. All easements/rights of way necessary to
convey an irrigation system to and through the proposed plat must be
conveyed to the City of Pasco. The irrigation lines shall run in
easements/rights of way as directed by the City Engineer.
15) All streets are to be developed to City Standards and/or as directed by
the City Engineer. Street grades for all arterial and collector roads
shall not exceed 6 percent. Interior local access street grades shall
not exceed 10 percent. Approaches to intersecting interior streets
shall not exceed 2 percent and any street intersecting an arterial or
collector street shall be zero (0) percent coming out of the toe of the
arterial/collector street slope. All temporary streets will be required to
have a paved turn around (2 inch pavement on 4 inches of rock base)
at the end of the street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
16) All water lines must be extended through the length of each proposed
plat. All water lines will be required to be looped with the existing
City of Pasco water system. A deposit is required for the removal of
any temporary loops installed by the developer. The deposit must
include the cost of removing the temporary piping, replacing damaged
curb, gutter and sidewalk, and a curb to curb replacement of all
pavement for at least 10 feet on both sides of the temporary line that
was removed. No water valves or meter boxes are to be located in any
easements or walkways.
17) Any and all utilities must be located as directed by the City Engineer.
This shall include but not be limited to gas, phone, power, cable and
all other utilities located within or adjoining this preliminary plat.
Any existing utilities that present difficulties shall be relocated at the
developer's expense, pursuant to the City Engineer's direction. All
utility plans, including the above mentioned, are required to be
submitted to the City of Pasco prior to subdivision approval.
18) The final plat(s) must contain the following statement: "Irrigation
service lines are currently available to lots within this plat; however,
water for the irrigation system may not currently be available. The
City of Pasco is constructing its irrigation infrastructure on an
8
ongoing basis. The use of the system will become available as time
and resources permit the expansion and connection of new systems to
the existing irrigation supply". This statement must appear on all
pages of said final plat(s).
19) Street lighting must be as directed by the City Engineer. Residential
street lights are typically installed every 300 feet and collector/arterial
street lights are installed every 150 feet.
20) The developer will be required to comply with the City of Pasco Civil
Plan Review process. A copy of the requirements for the civil plan
review process is available from the City of Pasco Engineering
Department. Construction plans submitted for each phase must
substantially conform to the approved preliminary drawings
submitted with the preliminary plat.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and
conclusions as adopted in the June 18, 2009 staff report.
MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of fact
and conclusions, as adopted, that the Planning Commission
recommend the City Council approve a Preliminary Plat for Chapel
Hill Division II to the Liberty Bankers with the conditions listed in the
June 18, 2009 staff report:
9
Vicinity Item: Preliminary Plat Chapel Hill Div II
Map A lieant: Libert Bankers Life N
�� y File : PP 09-002
R
.,_.; C•HAPEL HILL BLVD
..fit 1 +. , c r,.. .° A .. _.-�� __- -... �'Jy v.. �' f i' � •-
1 if
t _
aS�4 Q -
_ DEL'', ►AR�►CT r, -
y
CITYALIM TS
L � r
^+qtr• S I T E
Y { rr
0!t,.
- ARGENT RD _
_ CI LII ITS ..
Land Item: Preliminary Plat Chapel Hill Div II
Use Applicant: Liberty Bankers Life rr
Map File # : PP 09-002
CHAPEL HILL BLVD �2
Multi -
DEL Ao TM U I `I oo/ Family--Vac.
Family
a
C-IT-Y-L-IMIT � SFDU 's'
AlIpTREF OR U� W ����y ST UO�
Oppej �Fppw , ,"
NF�R UR
o SITE Vac.
Co
o�CIT-Y-LIMITS—
ARGENT RD
CIT-Y-LIMITS
' SFDU 's (County) -- -Com SFDU 'S ±_ oo
I I I
Zoning Item: Preliminary Plat Chapel Hill Div II
Applicant: Liberty Bankers Life rr
Map File # : PP 09-002
CHAPEL HILL BLVD
D
R=3
EL MAR CT�2�
C-1
R-4
C-IT-Y-L-IMIT � <u� �� �77-
AlIVTREF OR Uz Z� R=1
p• ��.
w000ej . ��oow
FOR �UR
RT SITE
RS-12 00
C=1 o�CIT-Y-LIMITS—
CITY-LIMITS ARGENT RD
RS-12 � RS-20 (County)
0
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 18 , 2009
TO : Planning Commission
FROM : Jeffrey B . Adams , Associate Planner
SUBJECT : Wagenaar Reserve Center BRAC Plan
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) is the process that the Department of
Defense (DoD ) uses to reorganize its installation infrastructure to more efficiently
and effectively support its forces , increase operation readiness and facilitate new
ways of doing business . For the past four decades , the DoD has used the BRAC
process to close and realign military base properties . Installations have been
converted to housing developments , business facilities , parks , and many other
uses based on the needs of the local community . The DoD places an emphasis on
converting the property into a productive , progressive property while balancing
the needs of the community and satisfying the regulations of the DoD .
In May 2008 the City of Pasco was granted recognition as the Local
Redevelopment Authority (LRA) for the Wagenaar Army Reserve Center . The LRA
is the entity to which the DoD entrusts the leadership of formulating a
comprehensive Redevelopment Plan (RDP) while following the prescribed BRAC
process .
The plan describes the community goals and constraints within which
redevelopment can occur, and recommends a plan that is compatible with those
parameters .
This report indicates how the Local Redevelopment Authority Advisory Committee
arrived at their decision for best future use for the property . The LRA 's decision is
based on Federal Law , more specifically , the "Base Redevelopment and
Realignment Manual" as amended March 1 , 2006 (DoD 4165 . 66 - M) .
Preparation of this plan included gathering background information on the issues
facing the community, conducting outreach to homeless agency providers ,
collecting input on the uses most in line with community needs , and assessing
how the facilities can best be used to meet those needs . Through public meetings ,
attempts were made to solicit community input . Reuse scenarios were considered
that combined various sources of input with an assessment of the quality of the
buildings located on the property and consideration for the integration into the
surrounding area .
1
BRAC law and regulation requires that specific notification be given to the public
and the homeless assistance organizations to ensure that they have ample
opportunity to engage in the reuse planning process .
In our case , Public and homeless agency notifications were provided by : 1 )
individual letters mailed directly to the agencies ; 2 ) two separate calls for Notice of
Interest (NOI) through the local newspaper (Tri- City Herald) , 3 ) e-mail
notifications to agency contacts ; and 4) "event" posting on City of Pasco event
calendar .
We have also continuously maintained a section of the City 's publically available
website as a dedicated resource for information on the Wagenaar Reserve Center .
The site contains meeting and other announcements , the Notices of Interest ,
reports , base redevelopment information , and maps and photographs of the
buildings and site . The web address is : http : / / www . pasco -
wa . gov/ Generallnfo / CEDWagenaarReserveCenterProject
As a result of our outreach efforts Three Notices of Interest (NOI) were received , as
follows :
1 . Dayspring Ministries—a tax exempt interdenominational charitable
organization whose mission is to "reach the lost for Jesus Christ by setting up
a ministry in every jail and prison . . . . . . " has a vision to create an Intensive
Outpatient Program of drug treatment .
The Notice of Interest contained a brief narrative of how the program would
work, including the uses intended in the Administration Building . It was
stated that along with treatment and therapy, there would be barrack style
housing with 24 beds for long term residential treatment . It would be intended
that meals would be served , along with other residential requirements such as
laundry , bathing, and exercise areas .
The NOI closed with further information regarding the mission of the
organization , an organization chart , contact information for the Board , tax-
exempt certifications , financial statements for years 2006 and 2007 , a portion
of the Continuum of Care 10 year plan , and a copy of Dayspring's tri-fold
brochure . There did not appear to be a business proposal clearly indicating a
sustainable plan for start up or detailed operations for any period of time .
2 . NW Laborer's Training Trust Fund proposed to use the property to recruit ,
train and retrain construction craft laborers . Recruitment and outreach would
be through area school districts , established pre - apprenticeship programs ,
Community Colleges , Vocational Training establishments , Job Corps Programs
and other various organizations as available . Funding for the program comes
directly from union labor hours .
2
The classes are a combination of traditional classroom learning environment
combined with hands -on learning . Both the interior and exterior of the Wagenaar
Center would be used for training . The organization proposed to use the
administration building for classrooms and staff; the storage building for
construction materials , and the property for actual hands on training . The
activities would consist of actual construction of concrete , pipe laying, utilities
construction , and other craft work . The constructed areas would be continuously
dismantled and reconstructed to simulate real field practices . The notice did not
elaborate on any remediation or renovation to the existing buildings .
This Notice of Interest rigidly followed the instructions for providing a notice of
interest . The document included an organizational history and profile , detailed
financial statements , and a pro forma for renovation of the existing facilities ,
including a two year cash flow analysis .
3 . The Port of Pasco provided three scenarios for redevelopment , namely , a
Small Business Incubator, General Tenant Leased Space (Building and Land) ,
and Port of Pasco Administrative and Maintenance Facility (The Port
subsequently decided not to pursue this option) .
The program need addressed by the Port of Pasco proposal is job creation and
industrial retention . The job creation strategy of the Port is to make reasonably
priced facilities and land available for new or expanding businesses .
The Wagenaar property is referred to in the Port of Pasco Master Plan as a
potential focal point within the designated "Attraction Area . " The Master Plan
concluded that the Attraction Area was the best location for potential job
creation after considering all development opportunities at the Big Pasco
Industrial Center (BPIC) , and recommended that the Port focus development
efforts on this area. The Wagenaar property would need to be added to the
Attraction Area limits to keep a uniform and consistent land use with all
surrounding property (industrial zoning) , creating a large contiguous parcel
that would be attractive for a single large facility , or conversely , allow for a
more dense development if used for multiple smaller facilities .
The Port of Pasco Notice of Interest also rigidly followed the instructions for
providing a notice of interest . The document included an organizational history
and profile , detailed financial statements , and a pro forma for renovation of the
existing facilities , including a five year cash flow analysis .
NOI Evaluation Process
The evaluation process was a combined effort of the LRA , the Advisory
Committee , and invited members of the community . The Advisory Committee was
3
asked to evaluate the Notices of Interest , using a weighted score sheet as a
guideline ( see Evaluation Matrix in Appendices) .
Each of the NOI 's were evaluated for thoroughness of response and for following
the specific instructions published in the Request for Notices of Interest . The NOI
evaluation process was established for the purpose of making a fair , reasonable
and balanced assessment of all the NOI 's submitted . All NOIs received equal
consideration . Balancing the needs of the local community was at the forefront of
the priorities as the assessment was completed . The AC recognized that needs
exist in the area for both homeless accommodations and economic development .
The AC considered many variables in their assessments and had requested
clarification of any ambiguities throughout the evaluation process . Typical
clarifications and information gathering were related to the following areas :
• History of past similar operations
• Sustainability of proposed operations
• Source and likelihood of funding for proposed operations
• Possibility of combining NOIs
• Facility upgrades proposed to make the property suitable for NOI proposal
Public / private transportation necessary to support the NOI proposal
• Zoning compatibility and possible changes needed
• Surrounding amenities for homeless
• NOI proposal description and definitions
• Applicability of various conveyance mechanisms
During the meeting key topics such as public transportation availability , building
modification needs , surrounding property compatibility , and long term
sustainability were discussed . A thorough discussion of the NOIs and their
respective strengths and weaknesses relative to the key topics (above) allowed a
clear consensus to be developed .
The Advisory Committee recommended support for the Business Incubator and
Port Related Economic Development uses as proposed by the Port of Pasco . NW
Labor was the second choice and Dayspring Ministries was the third choice ,
based upon the ten scoring criteria .
It should be noted that no Notices of Interest were received from a direct homeless
assistance provider .
Following the hearing a public meeting will be held on June 18 , 2009 for further
discussion of the Plan and formulation of a recommendation for City Council .
Once the City approves the Plan it will be submitted to HUD for a "Balance
Determination" and to the Military for Property Disposal Planning . The HUD
review of Homeless Assistance Application and balance determination is
4
anticipated for Fall 2009 . Army compliance with National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) and property disposal planning will follow the HUD determination .
Recommendation
MOTION : I move the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve
the Wagenaar Reserve Center Base Realignment and Closure Plan for
submittal to HUD for Balance Determination and to the Military for
Property Disposal Planning.
5
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP 09-005 APPLICANT: Planned Parenthood of
Central Washington
HEARING DATE: 6/18/2009 1117 Tieton Dr.
ACTION DATE: 7/16/2009 Yakima, WA 98902
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of Community Service Facility Level
One
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: Mark Twain Addition Lot 3
General Location: 3901 West Court Street
Property Size: 39,107 square feet (0.9 acres)
2. ACCESS: The site is accessible from Court Street.
3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site from Court
Street.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned C-1 (Retail
Business) and contains a 4,692 square foot unoccupied structure. The
property to the north is developed with Mark Twain Elementary School
and is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential). Properties to the east and
west are zoned C-1 and developed with a bank and multi-tenant office
buildings. Properties to the south are also zoned C-1. The Pasco Unified
School District resource center occupies two parcels to the south and a
car-wash is located to the southeast.
S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the site
for Commercial uses. The plan does not specifically address health
clinics, but various elements of the plan encourage locating businesses
in appropriate locations for their anticipated uses.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a
Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) in accordance with review
under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to locate a Community Service Facility at 3901 West
Court Street. The proposed facility will provide women's health care through
medical exams, cancer screening, reproductive health screenings, other
medical related services and a variety of educational programs. The 4,692
square foot building will contain three exam rooms, four administrative offices,
a kitchen, a waiting area, a small laboratory and five restrooms. Initial hours
of operation will be from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday.
The site is located on West Court Street 3,000 feet west of SR-395, which is a
State Highway. Court Street is an arterial street. Both Court Street and SR-
395 are able to accommodate high traffic volumes and would easily serve the
additional 70 vehicle trips per day estimated to be generated by the facility.
Court Street is fully developed in this area and would require no additional
infrastructure improvements.
The site provides 38 off-street parking spaces in two parking lots to the north
and south of the facility. The Pasco Municipal Code requires a minimum of 16
spaces to accommodate the clinic. Therefore, the applicant will exceed the
minimum parking requirement by twenty two (22) spaces.
Non-profit community clinics are defined as Community Service Facilities
(Level One) and as such are required to obtain a special permit before locating
anywhere within the city. The La Clinica facility at Court Street and 5th Avenue
and the Yakima Valley Farm Workers Clinic (Mir Mar) on Road 44 are examples
of other non-profit clinics that were reviewed in the past through the Special
Permit process. These types of clinics, as well as other medical offices are
located in "O" (Office) or "C-1" (Retail Business) zoning districts.
One of the areas of concern often expressed when special permit uses are
reviewed is their potential impact on property values. According to Benton
County Assessor records, property values have increased over the past six (6)
years for those properties surrounding the Planned Parenthood facility at 7426
W. Bonnie Avenue in Kennewick.
INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report.
The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the
result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record
hearing.
1. The site is zoned C-1 (Retail Business).
2. The site is located within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary.
3. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for Commercial uses.
4. The site proposed for the medical clinic is currently unoccupied.
2
5. Non-profit health centers are defined by the zoning regulations (PMC
25.12.155) as Community Service Facilities (Level One) which require
review by the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any
zone.
6. Business hours for restaurants, taverns, membership clubs and retail
stores often extend to 9:00 pm or later.
7. The proposed medical clinic could generate approximately 30-60 vehicle
trips per day (including employees).
8. The clinic will have up to 10 staff members.
9. The applicant anticipates the facility will provide services for
approximately 19-25 clients per day.
10. The site contains enough area for thirty eight (38) on-site parking stalls.
11. Other non-profit community health clinics in the community are located
in "C-1" (La Clinica) or "O" (Yakima Valley Farm Workers Health Clinic)
zones.
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions
based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows:
1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives
and text of the Comprehensive Plan?
The site is identified in the Comprehensive Plan for commercial uses. The
proposed medical clinic is a commercial office use. The Comprehensive Plan
encourages the development of a wide range of commercial uses located to
support local and regional needs. The proposed use is located near other
related medical facilities at Road 40 and Court Street and Road 44 and Court
Street. The facility will also be strategically located on a major arterial about
half a mile from a regional highway.
2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
All municipal utilities are currently available to the proposed site from
surrounding streets. The daily client base and number of employees at the
facility will not generate a greater demand on infrastructure than past uses on
the site.
3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in
harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity?
3
The office building being considered in this application has existed on the site
for over 40 years. It will continued to be maintained as an office building with
operating hours similar to those of surrounding offices. The proposed uses will
be less intense than other permitted uses within the C-1 District such as
restaurants, night clubs and certain types of stores. A medical clinic/office
will be operated and maintained in harmony with the intended character of the
general vicinity.
4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design
discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity
or impair the value thereof
The clinic is only proposing minor fagade improvements which will not alter the
size or height of the building. The existing facility was originally constructed in
1962. The existing commercial zoning and development has not impaired the
value of adjoining properties. A search of property tax records for properties
adjacent to the Planned Parenthood facility in Kennewick revealed that values
have increased over the past several years.
5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable
to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or
flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the
district?
Health clinics are generally less intense land uses than general retail uses. This
use will not generate vibrations, noise or fumes that often accompany
permitted uses such as car washes, shops, restaurants and taverns. A medical
clinic/office may be less disruptive to the adjacent residences than other
permitted uses due to the fact the clinic will be closed on weekends and during
evening hours when people tend to be home.
6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and
developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted
in the district?
Health clinics and medical offices are typically located within commercial
zoning districts and have not been found to create health or safety concerns for
neighboring businesses. The Planned Parenthood facility that was located on
20th Avenue several years ago was not a nuisance to other nearby uses on 20th
Avenue. Other uses permitted in the C-1 zone such as car-washes, taverns,
nightclubs and restaurants are more likely to be disruptive than the proposed
clinic.
4
TENTATIVE APPROVAL CONDITIONS
1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
2) The clinic shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site
plan submitted with the application;
3) The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit has not
been obtained by February 3, 2010.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed Planned
Parenthood Facility and initiate deliberations and schedule adoption of
findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council
for the July 16, 2009 meeting.
5
• Item: Community Service Facility
Vicinity Applicant: Planned Parenthood N
Map 09-005 File #. SP
At
W AGATE #014
SITE WAGATE ST
LL
_
t
r - . W�RU BY ST.
CO
RUBY ST
•r- r r F
COURT ST 4'
CO l
Q
fr►f F rrr� ' ,f _ ,nf T
- .•� - - PAL
r AL w
Community Service Facility
Land Item: Community Service Facility
Use Applicant: Planned Parenthood N
Map File #: SP 09-005
7 7-- � � I
W AGATE ST School
N
QSITE W AGATE ST
ry SFDU's � SFDU's
W RUBY ST
CO
W RUBY ST
w
3
COURT ST
CO
o Commercial Q
1 -%.Church o C)
BROWN-ST- Vac.
SFDU's S F D U 'S
Zoning Item: Community Service Facility
Applicant: Planned Parenthood N
Map File #: SP 09-005
W AGATE ST R- 1
N
QRS= 12 SITE W AGATE ST
O -j� a
W RUBY ST � R- � I Li
R� 1 M W RUBY ST
IW011 M
COURT ST
p � CO CO
° C1 Q
a - o C- 1
RS= 12 BROWN-ST
RS- 12
Exhibit 1 - 6-12-09 comments from Ryan Wright
Sophia Aquarius
From : Ryan Wright [ryanpwright @gmail . com]
Sent: Friday, June 12 , 2009 7 :46 AM
To : Sophia Aquarius
Subject: Proposed Planned Parenthood opening : Comments
Hi there,
I am a resident of Pasco and would like to comment on Planned Parenthood's proposed clinic.
Planned Parenthood has every right to open a clinic here . Being close to an elementary school or a self-described pro- life
neighborhood has no bearing whatsoever on the situation . I urge you to consider nothing more beyond basic property
rights and city and state law when making this decision . The city has no right to deny a private business's operating
license or otherwise make it difficult for them just because a few people want to scream about it.
Disclaimer : I am 100% pro-life and think abortion should be illegal , but that doesn't change the fact that it is legal and
this company has the right to operate . Besides, abortion is only a tiny fraction of what Planned Parenthood is about. If
the other pro-lifers actually looked into their business beyond the abortion issue, they would find the company is
performing wonderful and necessary services in the communities they serve .
Thank you for taking the time to read this,
- Ryan
1
Exhibit 2 - 6-12-09 comments from Nicole Prasch
Sophia Aquarius
From : Nicole Prasch [momnmb @gmail . com]
Sent: Friday, June 12 , 2009 8 : 07 AM
To : Sophia Aquarius
Subject : Planned Parenthood Pasco
Please do not approve a permit for Planned Parenthood in Pasco . They are a blight on
every community they enter. What is needed here is more abstinence not more
encouragement of sexual activity among teens . Planned Parenthood has recently been
exposed for failing to follow laws requiring them to notify authorities when young
teenage girls are having sex with adult men . They do not protect public health . I object
to there presence anywhere in Pasco .
Nicole Prasch
Exhibit 3 - 6-12-09 comments from Sonia Perez
Sophia Aquarius
From : Sonia Perez [sh_perez @msn . com]
Sent: Friday, June 12 , 2009 9 : 39 AM
To : Sophia Aquarius
Subject : Comment regarding Planned Parenthood Site in Pasco
Hello ,
I would like to comment on the proposed Planned Parenthood clinic in Pasco .
I honestly believe that having a Planned Parenthood clinic in Pasco is a very much needed service . I have
a 17 - yr- old son who I currently take to the Kennewick Planned Parenthood clinic to get condoms and the
convenience to have a clinic in Pasco again would be awesome . It would take my son half the time to get
to a clinic in Pasco then it would to get to the Kennewick clinic by bus and it would be more cost effective
for me if I have to drive him .
With the teen prenancy rate and STD ' s in Franklin County skyrocketing , I feel there is a desperate need to
have a facility that could provide services to families who cannot afford , or who do not have medical
insurance , to take their family members to seek the medical attention that Planned Parenthood provides .
I support Planned Parenthood ' s proposed site location to open a clinic, whether it be 80 to 100 feet from a
school . . . or a restaurant, like the one in Kennewick .
I for one , will welcome Planned Parenthood to Pasco .
11
1� yrrtt,
Sonia Perez -.Montes
Windows Live TM SkyDriveTM Get 25 GB of free online storage . Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone .
I
i
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant City of Pasco-Community &z Economic Development
Address 525 N Third Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301
Project Name Program Administration
Contact Person Angie Pitman
Telephone 509-543-5739 Fax 509-545-3441
Federal Tax ID Number
CDBG Funds Requested $120,000 Match 0
1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
CDBG funds are used to plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure
compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the
successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people.
2 . Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual
information.
All CDBG activities in Pasco benefit primarily low-moderate income persons. Census tracts
2011 202, 203 BG 3&r 4 and 204 are 71% LMI, there are 24 ,190 persons, 17,171 of which are
LMI.
3 . Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # All Strategy # All Objective # All Outcome # All
4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority:
This activity serves every type of eligible activity allowable under CDBG/HOME regs.
Al - Bricks &r Mortar Project resulting in visual physical improvements (engineering &
architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project
cost ) Reduce Barriers, Public Facilities, Neighborhood Revititalization
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
LMA - 570.208(a)(1)
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # 201, 202, 203, 204 Block Groups # All
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
* Public Smicc / Housing — Unit of measure ispeople * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
I't Quarter 6047.50 People 4.96 $30,000
2° Quarter 6047.50 People 4.96 $30,000
3` Quarter 6047.50 People 4.96 $30,000
4` Quarter 6047.50 People 4.96 $30,000
TOTAL 24,190 1 1 4.96 1 $1201000
8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income
Number of clients below 50% median income
Number of clients below 800/b median income
Number of elderly clients
Number of minority clients
Number of disabled clients
Total Pasco residents served
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco $110,000 $1051000 $117,000 $105,000
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $110,000 for the purpose of administering the CDBG Program
within the City of Pasco CDBG funds are used to plan, administer and deliver housing and
Pasco CDBG Application Form 1 2010
community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and
laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to
moderate income people.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 151550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: 120,000 0 12000
Salaries
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
(Describe)
TOTAL
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
If not funded at all, this activity would need to be paid from the city's general fund. If funded
partially, plans and studies that require assistance of a consultant may be cancelled or postponed.
Detailed Admin Budget 2010 Exhibit D
Admin Services Fee 12 , 000
Annual Membership Fees 300
Central Stores Purchases 500
Courier & Delivery Services 200
County Services 50
FICA 3 , 575
Legal Advertising 200
Legal Reference Books 500
Life Insurance Premiums 75
Lodging-Meals-Mileage-Airfair 31000
Med/Dent Insurance 117600
Medicare 850
Misc Advertising 500
Misc Office/Operating Supplies 500
Misc Professional Services 12 , 125
Miscellaneous 500
Office Equipment 300
Overtime-Regular 27000
PERS 4 , 150
Public Information Advertising 250
Repair & Maint - Office Equipment 500
Salaries & Wages Regular 621425
Seminar/Training Registrations 11500
State Industrial 275
Subscriptions 11000
Telephone 11000
Vision Insurance 125
TOTAL $ 1207000
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time,supplies,etc.,what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
Planning and administration of the CDBG and HOME programs will always be a necessary part of
these grants.It is vital to the success of the program.Without successful planning and
administration of the program activities.The program would not be in compliance with the HUD
rules and regulations and Pasco would cease to be entitled to receiving them.
16. Check"yes"or"no"for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction/renovation? ® ❑
a. Do you own the property?
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service
b. Economic Development
c. Acquisition
d. Public or community infrastructure/housing/facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas,writings,items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
Rick White,Director C&rED
Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name&Title Date
11 �:
11 ,�
11 �l
,ll ;
11
ill
I
r 11
50A 11
<; 11
OAF II'•.� ���Oi� ;p'���
o� �.�l I�!��.► ��
OAF
.III •�/� ���� / m I
��/� � 11 I
o�� l l
Polo
l�% ,, �� l l
Me, MA
I - � ,
pool Max rf.10!P21
PR I
A'
P///i /./iii owl �.�► ��I •/�/�.% %%" % •
vwmg�'F IMF 5—Ow
ow
j
/ ''''%
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant Elijah Family Homes
Address PO Box 3027 Richland WA 993544540
Project Name Continuing to Step Up
Contact Person Barbara Puigh
Telephone 783-7077 Fax 735-0730
Federal Tax ID Number 204058168
CDBG Funds Requested $ .2 ;000 ' - Match $ 303000
1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will
be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
Elijah Family Homes (EFH hereinafter) provides housing assistance and supportive
services to families whose application for public housing has been rejected. EFH currently
supports eight families whose income is extremely low (below 30% of area median income).
These families have twenty-seven children. EFH would like to support more families and
expand its area of operation to include Pasco. Accordingly, EFH is requesting Pasco CDBG
funds to acquire a three bedroom duplex or comparable property to be rented to EFH
clients.
Our mission is to provide safe, secure, affordable housing. EFH will be looking in
neighborhoods where the residents have low to moderate income and take pride in their
living conditions. EFH will first look at the target neighborhoods where Pasco is focused
on the Community Housing Improvement Program. If there is not available housing to
meet our criteria, we will look in other areas.
EFH would like to keep its options open to select the type of property, since we are
dependent on the type of property on the market at the time the funds are available.
Ideally, EFH is looking for a duplex, but would accept two single family dwellings on
adjacent lots. If a property is available that would be more cost effective to rehabilitate,
EFH would like the flexibility to select that property. The determining factor in our
selection will be the property that most meets clients' needs, at a cost-effective price.
This property will serve two families at a time. EFH plans to be around for a long time
and expects this property to serve a number of different families over the years. We are
relatively new, but our infrastructure is established and progressive. Our prior year
strategic plan is appended to this application.
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 1 of 10
- - - - - - - - Grants/CDBG P-asjco1%28_09/bz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Because EFH may be unknown to many of the people who read this application, we
would like to describe ourselves further. EFH owns a duplex in Richland obtained through
CDBG funding in 2008. EFH provides rent subsidies to landlords for six other families
who live in Richland, Kennewick and West Richland. The proportion of rent paid by the
tenants is on a sliding scale, based on income.
EFH tenants are a special-needs population. The children and parents have experienced
trauma. Most of the children had been removed from their parents' care in the past (either
by the state or their relatives because the children were neglected) and are now reunited.
To be eligible for EFH assistance, our clients must be making changes to improve their
lives. They must have one or more children under age 18. Before being accepted into EFH,
they have successfully completed family and personal rehabilitation programs to have their
children returned to their care. For example, if addiction is in their past, they must provide
treatment documentation to prove drug and alcohol abstinence for at least one year. EFH
clients often do not have a supportive family safety net. They are often families who have
experienced multiple generations of poverty; substance abuse, child abuse, domestic
violence and poor education. A major goal of EFH is to break this cycle.
EFH prefers duplex housing because the two families living side by side can be supportive
to one another. If the parents have a history of substance abuse, we have found that the
relapse rate is higher among those who have been clean for shorter periods of time. Clients
must have at least a year of documented sobriety before being accepted into our program.
We attempt to place a new family next door to one that has been clean for two or more
years.
Supportive services distinguish EFH from other housing assistance programs. EFH
provides the safety net while parents are completing education and beginning employment.
EFH continues to demand accountability, while providing friendship and role models.
Our clients have regular contact with volunteer mentors. Clients have random drug
urinalysis tests at least monthly, if drug abuse was in their history. The clients attend
monthly group meetings to address common problems, learn skills and have fun. Our
clients came a long way before they were accepted into EFH and we want them to be able
to continue their journey in a positive, independent direction. EFH also offers supportive
services to people on our waiting list.
During the past year, grants provided by some of our community partners, including the
Benton-Franklin/Burbank Community Public Health and Safety Network and Women
Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities, have assisted in financing therapy and children's sporting
and artistic activities. For examples, these funds paid for a high school boy to participate in
school-sponsored sports, families were given summer swimming passes, families attended
performances presented by Academy of Children's Theatre, and younger children enrolled
in gymnastics, soccer and T ball
EFH is a transitional housing program in that we expect our tenants to be on a continuum
of moving to greater independence While EFH provides a transitional step for tenants,
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 2 of 10
_ _ _ -Gxants/CDBG-Paaco]5_2$99/bz- - - - - _ - - -- - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - -
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
EFH itself is not transitional housing by the traditional definition based on time of service.
Although we would like our clients to be self-sufficient in three years, we do not have a
hard and fast deadline for continued services. Unless there are very substantial reasons,
EFH would not ask a family to move during the school year. All EFH supported children
remained in the same school from September 2008 to June 2009. Ideally, when a family
moves from our property, the children will remain in the same school area.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual
information.
EFH was started to address the unmet need of decent, safe, secure, affordable housing for
Tri-Cities families who cannot obtain housing through the normal channels and who have
no family safety net to assist them.
The federally-mandated homeless `point in time count administered by the Benton
Franklin Community Action Committee each year identifies the homeless in our area. In
January y2009, 474 people (including 93 in jail) identified themselves as homeless. In
January 2007, the number was greater and reported as 306 minor age children and 484
adults. The primary reasons given for homelessness, by those completing the survey, were
alcohol and/or drug addiction, criminal record, domestic violence or family beak up and
recent discharge from prison. Surveys in 2008 and 2009 have shown a decrease in the
number of homeless people, but the reasons remain. The numbers, though improved, have
not eradicated the problems. Interestingly, the 2009 point in time count shows a large
increase in the number of people at high risk of becoming homeless.
EFH fills a gap for a special needs population. The people we serve are a special needs
population because they are families with low income, with children, who do not qualify
for public housing. Although EFH is quite tolerant of mistakes in tenants past, EFH does
not accept sex offenders. Our choice of tenants is those who are on a continuum of
improving their lives.
The area may show an increase in homelessness when the survey is done next year. The
occupancy rate for rental units in the Tri-Cities is 971yo, according to a recent survey
reported in the Tri-City Herald. Because the occupancy rate is high, landlords are charging
higher rents. The net effect for low-income families is to make housing more unavailable to
them. Landlords are rejecting people, such as EFH-type tenants, in favor of more reliable
tenants. This makes rental units, such as EFH is describing in this application, even more
vital. Recently an EFH tenant made an appointment with a landlord on a Saturday to view
a three-bedroom apartment. When she arrived., there were also eleven other people there to
view the same apartment. No surprise, the apartment was rented to someone else,
probably someone with a better financial and social history.
Nearby communities, such as Spokane and Yakima, offer a suitable number of beds
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 3 of 10
- - -- -Grants/GDBG Pasce/S 28 O9/hz-- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
identified as "transitional housing." In the Tri-Cities, the number of units is more limited,
with only Oxford Houses and four other transitional housing units available. All of these
units limit the number of children who can stay in them. Additionally, the type of housing
may be unsuitable for children in any case. Children's safety and security in their homes
and neighborhoods are a primary focus in selection of EFH housing.
Many of our families are referrals from Safe Babies, Safe Moms (a program of the Benton-
Franklin Health District working with mothers of young children who are in drug
rehabilitation), Family Drug Court (no longer in operation), Adult Drug Court or
Department of Social and Health Services.
According to social workers and educators, children who move during the school year
lose about three months education with every change of school. In unstable families,
children often have to move several times during a year, resulting in loss after loss of
educability.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # IV Strategy # 1 Objective # 2 Outcome # I
The goal that best describes our project is "Improve Affordable Housing Opportunities for
Lower-Income Individuals and Households" If our Richland duplex experience serves as a
model, Pasco will find that EFH additionally fulfills other community priorities such as
reducing the number of homeless people, revitalizing neighborhoods and abating lead paint.
The strategy that best describes our project is "add to the existing stock of affordable
units by developing rental housing infill areas or targeted neighborhoods, consistent with
local comprehensive plans" Our project also fits into other strategies of improving the
quality of existing affordable housing stock.
On the continuum, EFH is working toward opportunities for our clients, with programs
like Habitat for Humanity. The objective that best describes our project is "Decent
Housing", but in the process, EFH is definitely creating a suitable living environment.
The outcome that best describes our project is "improve availability/accessibility", but
improving affordability and improving sustainability are also important to the project.
Although we do not have to choose an indicator, EFH would like to point out that if we
obtain a property that needs major rehabilitation, our objective would be to make it energy
efficient by Energy Star standards, as well as environmentally appropriate.
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 4 of 10
I
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority ® C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority:
The priority focus is "bricks and mortar projects resulting in creation or preservation of
housing for ... special needs population ... ." The impact of EFH owning a duplex to house
two families will continue and expand the positive influence EFH is making in the
community. We have concluded that the best way to deal with generational poverty,
substance abuse, domestic violence, crime and financial irresponsibility is to attend to the
needs of families who are sincerely trying to step up to a better life. While we subsidize
their housing, they concentrate on plans and work to become healthy, safe and more self-
sufficient.
Our families integrate most successfully into neighborhoods that are a step above that in
which they led their previously destructive lives. They cannot afford to move into these
better neighborhoods by their own means. EFH looks for housing in established
neighborhoods populated by law-abiding people. Most of our clients have low paying jobs
or are learning career skills. While EFH does not specifically target projects to assist
disadvantaged youth, our rental subsidies keep the families stable, which results in better
educational outcomes.
The property EFH obtains may very well revitalize the neighborhood in which our clients
relocate. The duplex that we purchased in Richland was physically improved to bring it up
to code with a new basement access window and exterior lead paint abatement. With a
grant from Richland Rotary, the bathroom was renovated. With another grant from
Columbia Center Rotary and a discounted price from Prudhomme Construction Company,
the yard fence was replaced. The neighbors helped with cleaning up the yard. Another
person anonymously donated a storage shed.
Although EFH has not selected partners for this project, we are confident based on past
experience that we will find both financial and in-kind partnerships. We will continue to
apply to banks and religious organizations for dollars. We have discussed partnering with
Habitat for Humanity's new in-kind "Brush with Kindness" exterior painting and
landscaping program. Pasco High, Tri-Cities Area Technical School or Columbia Basin
Community College may be open to student projects that can be incorporated into the
interior or landscaping of the property. We will try to incorporate neighbors and other
volunteer organizations into yard beautification. Until EFH acquires a specific property
and determines the amount of restoration required, it is hard to project partnering needs.
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 5 of 10
- - - - - - -Grants/�DB�Pasco/S_2d=o91bz - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract f# Block Groups #
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderateAncome employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
EFH cannot identify a property at this time, so a map is not attached We have checked
the real estate listings in several areas of Pasco.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many
unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or
retained. Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your
proposed project's success
* Public Service/Housing— Unit of m casum ispeople *Hotrebuyer— unit of m zisum is?musehAls
*Rehabilitation— Unit of measare is houses *Economic Devclopmrnt — Unit of measure is FTE jobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
Is` Quarter Projected 8 people at a
time, but multiple People x
families over years
2n Quarter 0 0
3rd Quarter 0 0
4 th Quarter 0 0
TOTAL 8 2
* This chart asks for unduplicated persons. If we were able to fill in the chart for eight people in
each quarter over the life of the duplex, the cost per unit would be substantially different. We
are looking for stability and this chart does not take that into account. This chart is meaningful
if used for nightly motel rooms for emergency housing, or for monthly rent in public housing.
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 6 of 10
-C- mitsLCDBG Pasco/5- 2_8 99d)z — - - -- - - - - - - - - -
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by
the following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income All
Number of clients below 50% median income NA
Number of clients below 80% median income NA
Number of elderly clients Possibly a grandparent
Number of minority clients 4 (estimate)
Number of disabled clients 1 (estimate)
Total Pasco residents served Expected s at a time
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
EFH has been successfully operating a duplex in Richland obtained with CDBG funds in
August 2009. The original amount designated was $94,000 but was increased to $136,577 at the
time of acquisition. The property cost $155,000 and former owner is carrying a deed of trust for
the balance. All payments have been made timely. All reports have been submitted timely.
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick 0 0 0 0
Richland 0 136,577 0 0
Pasco 0 0 0 0
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
EFH uses a number of factors to measure success:
1. Physically, success can be measured in units occupied times numbers of special needs or
formerly homeless occupants.
However, the following measurements are equally, if not more important:
2. School stability and attendance by the children.
3. Participation in our circle of support.
4. Maintaining healthy drug and alcohol free lifestyle, monitored by drug testing.
5. Participation in counseling, 12 Step and recovery programs.
6. Employment and wage increases.
7. Sliding scale increases in rent share as income increases.
8. Job training or school attendance.
9. Moving on to independent living.
EFH keeps track of the reasons for leaving the program. These have included moving to another
city to attend college, getting married and no longer needing our support, obtaining public housing,
and being asked to leave because of drug relapse and therefore no longer qualifying for EFH. All of
our current clients have been stable throughout the school year.
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 7 of 10
Gra�tsl GIIB��ascol S��s9/k� - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (809/o is
the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
All of our current clients are in the 30% HUD income guidelines. We expect that to be the case
for all tenants who enter our housing units.
2004 HUD income Limit Guidelines for iZennev�ick Pasco - Richland -;
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $197450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $227700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $373600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $602150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $453400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $707000 $75,200 $80,400 $857500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds
you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds
you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of
CDBG funds requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other -TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL:
Salaries 0 0 0 0
OPERATIONS: 0
Rent/Lease 0
Utilities 0
Supplies 0
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials $ 307000 ** 103000** Grants from $60,000 **
Labor/Contracts banks,other
10,000 ** 10,000 in kind EFH/ Partners
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price 120,000** 103000** Seller/bank 1327000 **
Closing Costs 21000** mortgage
OTHER:
HUD required 201000** 207000 **
moving and
relocation costs
TOTAL $ 182,000 $30,000 $212,000
** We anticipate the total cost of the project to be as listed in this table. However, the
breakdown between purchase price and rehabilitation cost will be dependent on the property
purchased In addition, the moving and relocation costs are dependent on whether there is a
current tenant in the house when we purchase it and what costs they will require. $20,000 is
the amount Richland held out of our 2008 grant to pay those costs.
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 8 of 10
-- - - -- _ - -Gx=tsJ-CDBG -Pwc-a/5_2&-QWbz- - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - - -
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please
describe:
No, but see the answers questions 4 and 15.
14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what
will you do?
EFH expects to move forward with the project by reevaluating the affordability of the project and
perhaps selecting another alternative. We would likely need to receive 80% of the requested funds
to proceed and we would expect to carry a privately funded mortgage. EFH is conservative with
recurring costs because any payments to others decrease the amount we are able to spend on our
families.
15 . if your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to
secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are
the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
These funds will not be used for recurring operational costs, but they will enable us to leverage
funds for other grants. For instance, the Washington Families Fund grants ten years of case
management for each unit, with an eligibility base of four units. Owning a duplex in Pasco in
addition to the one in Richland will make us eligible to apply for Washington Families Fund. EFH
will also apply for Benton County 2060 funds as soon as they become available. Our history of
obtaining other grants is understandably important to future grantors.
Many other grants require matching funds and allow a modicum of operational costs. We have
received grants from Benton-Frankhn/Burbank Community Public Health and Safety Network,
Bank of America, Sterling Savings and Loan, Knights of Columbus, Operation Rice Bowl, Diocese of
Yakima, AARP Foundation Senior Employment Program, Executive Service Corps, Bechtel Hanford
Inc., Richland Rotary, Columbia Center Rotary, Women Helping Women Fund Tri-Cities and
Three Rivers Community Foundation. EFH also has worked with Safe Harbor Crisis Nursery. We
have a good relationship with these and other organizations and will continue to work with these
groups and others to leverage our projects. EFH receives donations regularly from over one
hundred private donors. We also receive matching funds from employers and United Way
designations, named by our private donors. EFH is holding a fund-raising barbecue this summer.
EFH depends a lot on volunteers. We are fiscally conservative with overhead expenditures
because we want to maximize the amounts we spend on rent subsidies. We operate mainly as a
volunteer organization. Our administrators and officers are all volunteers and we are registered
with the Volunteer Center. We report over an average of over 200 volunteer hours per month. Our
only paid staff works part time at clerical and administrative assistance. LeMaster Daniels CPA
firm provides two offices at greatly reduced rent. We have a crew of volunteers who maintain our
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 9 of 10
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
properties and others who work directly with our tenants. Other volunteers develop programs
through our operations committee.
16. Check"yes"or"no"for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the sub recipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the sub recipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® El b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3. Does the sub recipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business?Maybe ❑
relocation of tenant
6. Does your project involve construction/renovation?Perhaps,depends on ® ❑
property
a. Do you own the property? ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure/housing/facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached,understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary
right to the ideas,writings,items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature of Authoriz Agency Official Printed Name Title Date
Elijah Family Homes
CDBG Application 2010
Application: Page 10 of 10
_ ___ __GrantsJCDRCPa�ico/5_28_09/bz
505 Swift Boulevard, P.O. Box 190 Richland, WA 99352
Richland Telephone 509-942-7390, Fax 509-9415666
www.cimchland.wa.us
May 29, 2009
Angie Pitman and City of Pasco Planning Commission
City of Pasco
P.O. Box 293
Pasco, WA 99301
RE: Elijah Family Homes
Dear Angie and Planning Commission:
This letter is written in support of Elijah Family Homes application to the City of Pasco for 2010
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to provide affordable rental housing opportunities
to at-risk families. The housing program offered by Elijah Family Homes assists the entire Tri-Cities
Community, and is consistent with the goals and strategies identified in the Tri-Cities Consolidated
Plan.
Elijah Family Homes received $136,577 of 2008 CDBG funds from the City of Richland that was used to
purchase a duplex. The duplex serves to provide affordable transitional rental housing for families below
50 percent of median income who have been rejected for public housing or conventional market housing,
typically due to negative legal/ credit history and substance abuse history. Targeted clients are families
who are currently homeless or are living in inadequate housing. An eligibility requirement is that the
tenant (s) must not have used illegal drugs or alcohol for one year or more. Random drug tests ensure
participants remain clean and sober, and a mentoring/case management system assists the family in
breaking the cycle of poverty and negative lifestyle.
Although Elijah Family Homes is a small, relatively new, non-profit organization run. primarily by
volunteers, our experience with them in the application, contract and follow up process has been
positive. Elijah Family Homes volunteers appear to be committed to learning and following CDBG
Program requirements to assure a mutually agreeable outcome. Since the purchase in August 2008 , Elijah
Family Homes has removed overgrown vegetation and replaced an old deteriorated fence, completed
minor interior improvements, and installed an egress window in the basement of one unit. Both units are
currently occupied, with the family contributing towards their rent on a sliding scale based on household
income.
Sincerely,
Deborah F. Bluher
CDBG/HOME Administrator
City of Richland
6 . Letters of Support : a ) City of Richland : Bluher
BENTON _
FRANKLIN
Community
Action =_
Committee
May 26 , 2009
Community Services Block Grant
Angie Pitman , Manager
City of Pasco
525 N 3`d Ave
Pasco , WA 99301
Dear Ms . Pitman :
am writing to express my support for the Elijah- Family Homes :( EFH) proposal
for the Pasco Community Services Block Grant Program . I have worked with
staff of Elijah Family Homes for over six years and am pleased with the
partnership and professionalism they bring to the table .
Over those years , Elijah Family Homes has been an active member on the
Benton Franklin Housing Continuum of Care Taskforce helping to provide
affordable housing for the homeless and those at- risk of homelessness . The
housing EFH provides and that which they project to provide meets objective
three ( 3) , " Reduce the number of homeless families" ; from the Benton Franklin
Ten-Year Plan to reduce homelessness by 50% by 2015 . Their project also
assists in filling some of the major gaps in our system by providing case
management and rental assistance for families with children and participates in
the Homeless Management Information System. ( HMIS) .
I look forward to a continued partnership with additional affordable housing
becoming available .
Sincerely ,
Judith A . Gidley, Executive Director
720 W. Court St . • Pasco, Washington 99301 • (509) 545-4042 • Fax (509) 544-9691
I cttcrc of Ciinnnrt • hl Mnntnn Frnnwin rAr • rirllcv
Caro[Latorre, LICSWt CUP
301 SpertgkrSt.
4Ucf&1u Wa. 99354
(509) 3 75-31 04
May 24, 2009
To Whom It May Concern:
I have been working with Elijah Family Homes (EFH) as a contract therapist since December
2008 . It has been a great privilege to become acquainted with the structure, programs,
operations,-and dedicated staff of this faith based -organization.
Clients served by EFH have substance abuse histories, many of the children are or have been in
State dependencies, and completed educational levels among the clients are very low. Therefore,
clients' rental and credit histories are a formidable hindrance to the goal of securing a safe and
stable home. These people served do not qualify for public housing. Only with the first step of
living in appropriate homes can the families begin to move forward with creating a more pro.
social, integrated life style. EFH, through their rent assistance and housing programs, supplies
this critical foundation. Further, EFH recognizes and addresses a number of the factors that are
essential in breaking the often generational patterns of dysfunctional families . The emphasis is
on enhancement of parenting skills, positive parent/child interaction, and opportunities for
practicing social skills. To this end, there is a high level of accountability, and both recreational
and educational activities are offered. Therapy, case management and mentoring are available.
EFH is predominantly a volunteer organization directed by a Board of committed persons with a
range of professional expertise. The level of commitment and cooperation throughout the
organization is remarkable. The meticulous research and planning with which they approach
program development and implementation has led to their current success. EFH has a vision.
The vision has become operational. As a result, EFH is not only positively influencing
individual lives, but it is also contributing significantly to the health and wellness of our
communities.
Carol Latorre, LICSW, CDP
6. Letters of Support : c) Counselor: Latorre
1105 Putnam St.
Richland , WA 99354
pstrfaster(cDhotmail . com
May 26 , 2009
Ms . Barbara Puigh
Elijah Family Homes
8131 W. Grandridge
Kennewick, WA 99336
Dear Ms. Puigh,
I am writing in support of the application Elijah Family Homes (EFH) will be
making to the City of Pasco. I understand that EFH intends to apply for block
grant funds to purchase property in Pasco that will be used for housing for
qualified low income families.
Elijah Family Homes purchased a duplex across the street from my house late
last year. EFH did a fine job of preparing the property for the new residents. The
house-was-painted-end-an- old-fence=has been- replaced, -work was also- done
inside the house. Two families have moved into that home. I could not wish for
better neighbors. They have kept the yard in good condition . They are quiet and
consider of other neighbors . Both families have small children which they
supervise responsibly. They have spoken with me about their desire to be
responsible renters and neighbors. In my opinion the second chance afforded to
them has been great benefit to them personally and to our neighborhood. I am
proud to call them neighbors.
What I have learned about EFH leads me to conclude this is not an isolated
anomaly. Other positive examples can be found in other properties used by EFH .
I believe it would be a worthwhile investment of public funds for Pasco to give
favorable consideration of your application.
I fully support the mission of EFH , and I have no reservation about endorsing this.
application .
Sincerely,
, C�V."
Richard Nordgren
b . Letters of support : d ) Richland Resident : Nordgren
0% RECEIVED
JUN 0 1 2009
Helping One family at a Time COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Angie Pitman, CDBG Administrator June 1, 2009
City of Pasco Planning Commission
PO Box 293
Pasco, WA 99301
Dear Ms. Pitman and Planning Commission Members:
Elijah Family Homes (EFH) is a nondenominational, faith-based organization that has been
operating in the Tri-Cities since May 2005. EFH's mission is to strengthen the community by
helping families establish safe and stable homes and improve family living. Our work is to
provide rent subsidies and offer supportive services for families with low income who do
not qualify for public housing. Although Elijah Family Homes is faith-based, recipients are not
required to hold any particular religious beliefs nor to participate in any religious services.
The first EFH client was a single woman, with six children, living in a two-bedroom picker's
cabin in an orchard. She could not find adequate housing for her family because she was poor
and had a felony conviction related to illegal drugs. Elijah Family Homes is currently assisting
eight families with 27 children in Kennewick and Richland.
This grant would allow us to expand our service area to Pasco for two households each year.
We are asking for $182,000, out of a total projected cost of$212,000, to purchase and
renovate (if needed) a three-bedroom duplex or other appropriate property in Pasco to provide
long-term housing for two families who have barriers to obtaining other housing assistance.
These funds will also allow our program to grow, as we can leverage these funds to obtain
additional grants. Leveraging funds would help EFH move from a volunteer organization to
one with staff who can better serve clients.
Elijah Family Homes is an active part of a supportive community network helping families
in need break the cycle of poverty and substance abuse and achieve self-sufficiency. EFH
has good experience partnering with other organizations. Together, with your help, EFH
can increase our efforts to reduce homelessness in our area. Thank you for your
consideration of this proposal.
Sincerely yours,
Barbara Puigh,
President
8131 W.Grandridge Blvd elijahfamilyhomes @clearwire.net P.O.Box 3027
Kennewick,WA 99336 http://elijahfamilyhomes.co.nr Richland, WA 99354
(509)783-7077 501(c)(3)non-profit corporation Fax(509)735-0730
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2030
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant Jericho Road Ministries RECEIVED
Address 2500 Jericho Rd. Richland,WA 11 IN. n 9 2009
Project Name HavenSafe
ENT
Contact Person Amy Schultz,Executive Director '°-
Telephone 509-627-0750 Fax
Federal Tax ID Number 20-3213204
CDBG Funds Requested 288,000.00 Match 72,000.00
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
HavenSafe is temporary,full-time,transitional housing serving women and children
experiencing family violence,located in West Pasco. CDBG funds will be used to provide
funding for land,building,furnishings, appliances and landscaping. This will provide a safe
and secure facility for victims of family violence. Currently,services only exist for intimate
partner domestic violence victims.No bed space is available for boys age 13-18 nor is there
adequate bed space to meet community need.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual
information.
In 2008,Pasco Police Dept.responded to over 1,100 domestic related calls within the city
limits. This showed an increase of just over 200 calls from the previous year,demonstrating
a growing need.
Domestic Violence Services of Benton/Franklin Counties report of the 146 adults to have
received shelter through November of 2008,prior community data was collected from 128.
There were 43 that identified Pasco or Franklin County as their previous location.DVS
screens victims based on qualifications.The primary screen out is the violence occurred
with an intimate domestic partner. For July through November,2008,there were 40
households declining or not qualifying for shelter services. Eleven of those households
included children.
Victims are reluctant to leave their community,uprooting their children during an already
disruptive situation. Research tells us maintaining victims within their own environment,
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
schools, churches, etc. decreases trauma and increases healing/empowerment processes .
I Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # 5 Strategy # 1 Objective # 1 Outcome # 1
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority X C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: HavenSafe provides social services and
basic needs to address family violence
issues in a targeted population with
critical need.
5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
a. X You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # Block Groups #
C. X Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons X Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
X Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. X Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
*Public Service/Housing- unit of measure is people * Homebuyer- Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation- Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development - Unit of measure is FfE jobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
1" Quarter
2nd Quarter
3rd Quarter 35 Persons served 415.00 147525.00
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
4` Quarter 35 Persons served 415.00 14,525.00
TOTAL 70
S . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income
Number of clients below 50% median income 30
Number of clients below 80% median income 33
Number of elderly clients 1
Number of minority clients 43
Number of disabled clients 1
Total Pasco residents served 70
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick NA NA NA NA
Richland NA NA NA NA
Pasco NA NA NA NA
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
HavenSafe will provide an additional 15 bed spaces for persons experiencing domestic violence. The
unique service is the acceptance of persons who are not intimate partners in this role as victims,
such as adult children living in their parents home. Currently, there is no place for mothers to bring
their male children ages 13-17. Male dependents, age 1347 will be accepted into the shelter on a case
by case basis if their mother is seeking shelter.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (8011/o is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
`'2009 .HUD income Limit Guidelines for:Kenriewiek - Pasco Richland
. ... , , ,
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $197450 $21,000 $22,550 $247100 $257650
50% $22770.0 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $407200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $419500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $647300 $68,450
Median $457400 $517800 $587300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Source of Other
Funds Other Funds Funds TOTAL BUDGET
PERSONNEL: 34,000.00 Community 341000.00
Salaries fundraising and
ants
OPERATIONS: 38,00600 Community 38,000.00
Rent/Lease fundraising and
Utilities other grants
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION: 200,000.00 2007000.00
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY: 70,000.00 70,000.00
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER: 81000.00 181000.00
Landscaping 87000.00
Furnishings
Artistic 27000.00
enhancements
TOTAL 288,000. 00 360,000.00
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
Project schedule is just beginning. Other funds not secured as yet. Fundraising efforts are underway
that will provide additional funds, donated materials and services. In-Kind services and materials
will provide much of the additional costs as acquired. Specifically, a donation of land and building
services is being solicited from builders and service clubs Requested Grant amount may be smaller
if land is donated. Materials and other services will be solicited once property is secured. Grants
from service clubs and funding from local churches will provide the bulk of operating costs and
salaries to run the project.
Secured In-Kind includes: engineering and design services from Don Pratt, Translation services of
materials and advertisements into Spanish, Printing services from local churches. Social services
support from Pasco DVR and current social service agencies.
8
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
Continue to solicit donation of land and services from the building community such as Home
Builders Association and Carpenter's Union, Pasco Bulldog House, etc. If funding is not secured,
delay in building will occur. The project will continue to move forward as supplies and services are
provided.
Jericho Road Ministries will continue to build their outreach services to domestic violence victims
that do not meet the normal requirements of intimate partner language to provide goods and
services that will help clients find safety and goods that will provide for their basic needs.
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
Furnishing the house will require an initial investment of 8,000.00 for furniture and appliances.
Landscaping and art enhancements will be maintained with volunteers and the residents of the
home as needed. Charitable groups will be used to `adopt a room' as needs arise and provide
furnishings and goods. Service clubs will provide for updates of landscaping and other incidental
items.
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? X ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? X ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑ X
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ X
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ X
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ X
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? X ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑ X
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? X ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition X
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑
9
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
Z , &Cfc� 6711 io
Signatyfe 6f Authorize nc Official Printed Name & Title Date
Community Development Block Grant Application
2010 CDBG Program Year
Public Service Special Attachment #1
Complete this page if you are proposing to provide a "Public Service"
1. When was your agency organized / formed? March 14, 2006
2. Is your agency a Washington State non-profit corporation and/or a faith based Yes X No E]organization?
3. Does your agency have federal IRS non-profit status? Yes X No ❑
4. List any required accreditation your agency / staff must have in order to do business:
501-c-3 IRS status for agency. Social Service experience and 2 years education in business, psychology or social
services for staff. Washington State background clearance.
10
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
S. To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this
purpose? Application in process to Seroptimist International of Pasco-Kennewick
6. Will CDBG assist in leveraging or matching other funding? Yes No X
7. Is this the first year for the program? Yes X No ❑
a. Year began: 2010
8. If you receive funding for 2010, how will your program be funded in the future?
Grant writing will be ongoing. Local churches, Service clubs and fundraisers will provide the core funding for
the project.
9. If you received CDBG funding in 2009, please quantify the increase in service that you will provide during 2010
and explain why there is a new demand or an unmet need in the community for this service.
11
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application
2010 CDBG Program Year
Economic Development Special Attachment #2
Complete this page if you are proposing to provide an "Economic Development" project
1. Please list the DUNS Number of your business: 29350 g J
2. This is a: X non-profit ❑ for-profit X faith-based
3. Describe how your project will make the most effective use of CDBG funds?
HavenSafe will provide temporary, full-time, transitional housing serving women and
children experiencing family violence, located in West Pasco. CDBG funds will be used to
provide funding for land, building, furnishings, appliances and landscaping. This will
provide a safe and secure facility for victims of family violence. Currently, services only exist
for intimate partner domestic violence victims. No bed space is available for boys age 13-18
nor is there adequate bed space to meet community need.
4. Is there leverage of other funds?
In-Kind support will provide materials and services that total over 20,000.00 to our clients. Other
funding will include income from the faith-community, Local service clubs such as Soroptimist
International and Rotary and fundraising events such as an Art/jewelry Auction and Dinner.
5. How will you assure that CDBG funds are not substituted for other non-federal investment?
Use of Quick Books designating income and expenses are carefully categorized into appropriate line
items. Careful record keeping will designate and track income and expenses.
6. Can you demonstrate that your project will meet the minimum federal CDBG threshold of providing
one full time equivalency job (32 hours per week) per $35,000 of CDBG funds, or provide goods or
services to residents of a low-moderate income (LMI) area, such that the number of LMI persons
residing in the area served amounts to at least one LMI person per $350 of CDBG investment, and
that at least more than one half (51%) of the total jobs created will be filled by very low, low and
moderate-income persons? How will you make sure that the jobs will be made available to very low,
low and moderate-income persons?
One FTE position will be filled by an AmeriCorps Vista Member who will be selected from the
geographic area we serve. According to OSPI 62% of Pasco School students are on free or reduced
lunches. The area supports hiring of low income persons.
Use of employement programs such as WorkSource and Goodwill will offer a low income employee
pool from which to select employees.
12
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Our clientele target area according to US Census data summary file, #3, is anywhere from 34.2% to
66. 8% under income depending on situational living conditions. At least 60% of our clientele will be
under income. This will be determined by entrance interview data collected.
7. Is your request being used for business incentives or for recruitment of a business from another city
or state? If yes, describe in detail. Are the proposed jobs existing positions or are they new?
No.
8. Show the number of new permanent jobs projected to be created (seasonal jobs do not count):
Job Title # l~TE Jobs Created # Part Time Jobs'# FTE Jobs Filled # Part Time Jobs
Created , b Lhr1l `. Filled by LMI
House Director 1
Relief House 1 1
Director
AmeriCorps Vista 1 1
** LMI jobs refer to anyjoh that can be held by a person with no advanced training or education beyond
high school - or a job that the business agrees to hire unquabTied persons for and provide training.
13
Map of Pasco;WA by MapQuest2fPas. �,���V by MapQts Page 2 of 2
MA ' tE3 o 2400 ft
1
,€ N
.unit Trt
:i
E
ant Rd
Rd
3
yy
3
�d
f. .,. .. "
�w
cog!t 3t;
`Z
IM
as
West
V
ti w
2009 Tt:Q: Tcta..AiJas
MaPouest inn.
All rights reserved.Use subject to License/Copyright Map Legend
Directions and maps are informational only.We make no warranties on the accuracy of their content,road conditions or
route usability or expeditiousness.You assume all risk of use.MapQuest and its suppliers shall not be liable to you for
any loss or delay resulting from your use of MapQuest.Your use of MapQuest means you agree to our Terms of Use
http://www.mapquest.com/maps?city=Pasco&state=WA&zipcode=99301&country=US&la... 6/1/2009
Pasco CDBG Application Form 20 10
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant Boys &t Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties RECEIVED
Address 801 N. 18th Avenue,Pasco,WA 99301
Project Name Boys &t Girls Club Targeted Outreach Efforts -Design PhAyN 0 1 2009
Contact Person Ron McHenry COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Telephone 509-543-9980 Fax 509-543-9981
Federal Tax ID Number 91-1673327
CDBG Funds Requested $17,500.00 Match $9,300.00
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
The project will provide the Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties with the
necessary architectural design and review to begin expansion efforts at the Public Facility
located at 801 N. 18th Avenue. Through a Targeted Needs Assessment it has been
determined that youth in our community in grades 6-8 are underserved by current youth
service programs. The current facility does not have the space available for serving this
population or the necessary infrastructure to provide a safe environment for all children.
Youth targeted for service fall in the age range of 11-14 and are most susceptible to negative
influences from peers. This is also a time when their peers become involved in activities
which may include violent actions.
Funding from the Community Development Block Grant for 2010 will address this need by
allowing the Boys & Girls Club to engage the services of an Architect to provide direction
on site plan elevation and structure and better prepare the organization for a correct
assessment in estimating building cost. The building envisioned will be placed in the back
cement area directly outside the gymnasium and consist of a simple stand-alone structure of
2,500-3,000 square feet. This building will be dedicated to providing services to youth in
grades 6-8 at a time in their lives where having a `place of their own' is important and they
begin to establish the character traits which will affect their future lives.
Because the current facility has a Gymnasium Art Room and Kitchen which can be
repurposed during specific times during the week for exclusive use by the tween population
the new outbuilding will be a simple open space with computer lab area, social recreation
zone and learning center - providing on a daily basis the most important elements of Boys
& Girls Club programs.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual
information.
The services that the Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties offer are
specifically related to the strategic priorities adopted by the City of Pasco. The youth served
in our program are predominantly from low-income households and would otherwise be
unsupervised during, program hours Students attending the two schools closest to the Boys
Pasco CDBG Application Form 201. 0
& Girls Club are some of the neediest in the community, with 89 . 7% and 94. 7% of students
receiving free or reduced lunches . These youth will be more safely served educationally and
recreationally through this project. Goal III, Strategy 1 addresses the improvement of
community or neighborhood centers . Additionally, the work of the Boys & Girls Club and
this project will address Goal V, Strategy 2 by providing services to children and youth
homeless families and lower-income families.
Currently there are 49 members who will be ineligible to attend the Main Branch in 2009-
2010 . Services for youth in grades 6-8 are available at the Teen Center at 333 W. Court
Street, however, many of these members are from the neighborhood directly adjacent to the
Main Branch and will not travel to programs, even with the semi-close proximity.
Additionally, many of these youth are often intimidated by even the thought of attending a
program with others so much older than them. On average, 40 youth ` age-out ' of the Main
Branch facility annually. In 2008 -2009 only 3 continued attending Boys & Girls Club
programs by transitioning to the Teen Center.
When the project is fully realized over the course of the next 2-4 years with the construction
of the ` Tween Center' , we anticipate being able to retain 80% of participants from the Main
Branch, growing the ` Tween Center' population to an average of 80 youth a dU in just three
years. By having a separate facility where more age=appropriate activities can take place and
staff who are able to focus on the special needs of an adolescent population transitioning to
their teen years we will have the capability to more effectively serve the youth in our
community who need us most.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # III Strategy # 1 Objective # I Outcome # 1
4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that
priority:
This project will result in design elements which will assist in the increase of space
available to persons in a public facility.
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # Block Groups #
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
*Public Service I Housing - Unit of measure is people * Homebuycr - Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development - Unit of measure is FIEjobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
1" Quarter 0 No Work No Work No Work
2"d Quarter 0 No Work No Work No Work
3rd Quarter 480 Youth Served $36.46 $17,500.00
4th Quarter 0 Youth Served No Work $17,500.00
TOTAL 480 Youth Served - $17,500.00
S. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income 221
Number of clients below 50% median income 249
Number of clients below 80% median income 10
Number of elderly clients 0
Number of minority clients 456
Number of disabled clients 3
Total Pasco residents served 480
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick $106,813.04
Richland
Pasco $203,000 $157,166.25 $93,000 $34,956
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
The groundwork will be laid to increase the capacity of the Boys & Girls Club, provide a safer
environment for current members and age appropriate programs for an underserved youth
population.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (800/o is the
maximum eligible) . These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
300/o $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $227550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
800/0 $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $647300 $68,450
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $645800 $70,000 $757200 $80,400 $ 85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
Pasco CDBG Application Form 201. 0
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: $1,800.00 BGCBFC $1,800.00
Salaries
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering $17,500.00 $17,500.00
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER: $7,500.00 Architect $7,500.00
(Describe) In-Kind
TOTAL $17,500 $9,300 $26,800.00
13 . Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
The funding from the Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties has already been
included in the fiscal budget and includes personnel for managing the project. Through the course of
interviewing architects we have found that they are amenable to potentially working at cost,
providing in-kind assistance to lower the cost of the project.
14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
Complete the project to extent practical based on funds received.
15 . If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc. , what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
No CDBG funds will be used for this purpose.
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4 . Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6 . Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
Pasco CDBG Application Form 201. 0
a. Public Service F-1
b. Economic Development
c. Acquisition
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract (s) .
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
Ron McHenry, VP of Finance 05-29-2009
S�ignaFuR of Authorized Ag cy Official Printed Name & Title Date
Court St.
395
201 ' St. 18`" St, Boys & Girls Club
Edgar Brown Stadium
Sylvester
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant Boys &Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties
Address 801 N. 181h Avenue,Pasco,WA 99301
Project Name Design and Technology Infrastructure EnhancemeRIVED
Advance of Facility Expansion JUN 0 1 2009
Contact Person Ron McHenry MMuu
Telephone 509-543-9980 Fax 50 Y3NA§f'ONOM{C DEVELOPMENT
Federal Tax ID Number 91-1673327
CDBG Funds Requested $55,000 Match $17,463
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
The Boys & Girls Clubs Main Branch facility is located within an old elementary school
building, originally constructed in 1954 Through a Targeted Needs Assessment it has been
determined that youth in our community in grades 6-8 are underserved by current youth
service programs The current facility does not have the space available for serving this
population or the necessary infrastructure to provide a safe environment for all children.
Youth targeted for service fall in the age range of 11-14 and are most susceptible to negative
influences from peers This is also a time when their peers become involved in activities
which may include violent actions.
Funding from the Community Development Block Grant for 2010 will address this need
two ways To prepare for the inclusion of older youth in our current program model, as well
as react to an increase of arrests in our immediate neighborhood which have involved
significant wegpons each program area in the facility will be equipped with an LCD
monitor and camera The camera will allow for a staff member who is centrally located to
assist in monitoring situations developing in n any space and the monitors will be used to
communicate in the event of a lockdown Additionally the system will allow any staff
member including those housed in the administrative section to use a key-combination on
their terminals to initiate a pre determined lockdown procedure at any time. With potential
expansion to the facility occurring which will not involve direct access to the interior of the
building it t important that each area of the Boys & Girls Club campus has the ability to
communicate efficiently in an emergency.
Currently there is no working exterior lighting for the building with the exception of the
south facing side This presents safety issues during the late fall winter and early spring, as
large trees in the neighborhood block out what small amount of natural light there is.
Additionally, during the summer months there is a significant increase in graffiti and other
forms of vandalism which result in damage to the facility. Funding will be utilized to
provide additional light fixtures that illuminate the front west facing side of the building to
ensure safe circumstances for youth and parents traveling to and from the Club and on the
North and East sides where no lighting is currently present.
Pasco CDBG Application Form 010
IMIMM 1011
2 . Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual
information.
The services that the Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties offer are
specifically related to the strategic priorities adopted by the City of Pasco The youth served
in our program are predominantly from low-income households and would otherwise be
unsupervised during_program hours Students attending the two schools closest to the Boys
& Girls Club are some of the neediest in the community, with 89 .7% and 94 . 7% of students
receiving free or reduced lunches These youth will be more safely served educationally and
recreational) t� hrough this project Goal III Strategy 1 addresses the improvement of
community or neighborhood centers Additionally, the work of the Boys & Girls Club and
this project will address Goal V Strategy 2 by providing services to children and youth,
homeless families and lower-income families .
Currently there are 49 members who will be ineligible to attend the Main Branch in 2009-
2010. Services for youth in grades 6-8 are available at the Teen Center at 333 W. Court
Street however, many of these members are from the neighborhood directly adjacent to the
Main Branch and will not travel to programs even with the semi-close proximity
Additionally, many of these youth are often intimidated by even the thought of attending a
program with others so much older than them On average 40 youth ` age-out' of the Main
Branch facility annually. In 200_8-2009 only 3 continued attending Boys & Girls Club
programs by transitioning to the Teen Center.
When the project is fully realized over the course of the next 2-4 years with the construction
of the ` Tween Center' we anticipate being able to retain 80% of participants from the Main
Branch growing the ` Tween Center' population to an average of 80 youth a day in lust three
years By having a separate facility where more age-appropriate activities can take place and
staff who are able to focus on the special needs of an adolescent population transitionmg to
their teen years we will have the capability to more effectively serve the youth in our
community who need us most.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # III
Strategy # I Objective # I Outcome # I
4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that
priority:
This project will result in an improvement to a public facility.
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # Block Groups #
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
I ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
* Public Scrvice I Housing — Unit of mcasurc is people * Homebuyer — Un it of measure is households
* Rehabilitation — Unit of mcasurc is houses * Economic Development — unit of mcasurc is FTE jobs andIor businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
I" Quarter 0 No Work No Work No Work
tad Quarter 0 No Work No Work No Work
3`d Quarter 180 Youth Served $114.58 $20,624.40
4`h Quarter 300 Youth Served $114.58 $347375.60
TOTAL 480 Youth Served - $55,000.00
8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income 221
Number of clients below 50% median income 249
Number of clients below 800/o median income 10
Number of elderly clients 0
Number of minority clients 456
Number of disabled clients 3
Total Pasco residents served 480
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick $106,813.04
Richland
Pasco $203,000 $157,166.25 $93,000 $34,956
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
The groundwork will be laid to increase the capacity of the Boys & Girls Club, provide a safer
environment for current members and age appropriate programs for an underserved youth
population.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (800/o is the
maximum eligible) . These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
R
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $ 80,400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Requested CDBG Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Expense Funds Other Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: $12,463 BGCBFC $12,463
Salaries
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials $52,000 $5 ,000
000
Labor/Contracts $3,000 $3,
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER: $5,000 Sharefest $5,000
(Describe) Sharefest In-Kind
TOTAL $55,000 $17,463 $72,463
13 . Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
The funding from the Boys Est Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties has already been
included in the fiscal budget and includes personnel for managing the project and installing the
requisite hardware, peripheral devices and wiring upgrades necessary for completion of this project.
14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
Complete the project to extent practical based on funds received.
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization)
No CDBG funds will be used for this purpose.
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? El
4 . Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ LnJ
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one) El a. Public Service
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
Ron McHenry, VP of Finance 05-29-2009
Date
Allomparuthorized Agency Official Printed Name &z Title
Court St.
395
20t" St 18t" St Boys & Girls Club
Edgar Brown Stadium
Sylvester
{ l'
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application — 2010 Program Year
Applicant City of Pasco—Administrative and Community Services
Address PO Box 293,Pasco,WA 99301 R�G�� E®
Project Name Lucas Park Playground MAY 2 9 20
Contact Person Dan Dotta,Facilities Manager COMMLIN49€CONOW DEVEWPMENr
Telephone (509)543-5757 Fax (509)543-5758
Federal Tax ID Number
CDBG Funds Requested $60,000 Match
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
Replace the outdated playground equipment at Lucas Park.This project will serve the local
neighborhood that is low to moderate income families.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual
information.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs(Attachment B)—what Goal,Strategy,Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal# III Strategy# 2 Objective# 1-SLE Outcome# 1-Avail.
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A.High Priority ® B.Average Priority ❑ C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: In FY-2010, the CDBG program spent
$60,000 on installation of playground equipment in Lucas Park of a targeted area
for the purpose of mailing a suitable living environment available for the citizens
who live in the area 67.8 % of whom are low-t
5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box-a,b,c,d)
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract# 203 Block Groups# 3,4
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
*Public Service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
I" Quarter 1177 People $12.74 $15,000.00
2 Id Quarter 1177 People $12.74 $15,000.00
3rdQuarter 1177 People $12.74 $15,000.00
4t Quarter 1177 People $12.74 $15,000.00
TOTAL 4709 $12.74 $601000.00
8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income 1125
Number of clients below 50% median income 788
Number of clients below 80% median income 1283
Number of elderly clients
Number of minority clients
Number of disabled clients
Total Pasco residents served 4709
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco $100,000 $213,276 $40,000 $115,000
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
This will give the neighborhood children a safer place to play. There will be more activity in the
park.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 1 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 1 $70,000 $75,200 $805400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL:
Salaries
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION: $605000 $60,000
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
(Describe)
TOTAL $60,000 $60,000
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
Leave the existing play equipment in place.
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
Maintenance will not be paid by CDBG.
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ® ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ® ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑
a. Do you own the property? ® ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑
7.
at type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
S`
t�s tri F/�t , � rlr5 a� .aeriz
Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name & Title Date
8
rs�,A c
t
u
u�s
h-$a
t e
e
F
1W
k"
e
�x
RECEIVED Pasco CDBG Application Form 20 10
MAY 2 9 2009
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
COMMUNU&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Applicant City of Pasco-Department of Community&Economic Development
Inspection Services Division
Address 525 North 3rd Avenue,Pasco,WA 99301
Project Name Provide Inspection Services In Low and Moderate Income Ares of Pasco
Contact Person Mitch Nickolds,CBO,Inspection Services Manager
Telephone (509)545-3441 Fax (509) 545-3499
Federal Tax ID Number n/a
CDBG Funds Requested $48,000 Match $ 17,025
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
Blight conditions,property nuisances and fire hazards in homes and upon properties
owned and/or occupied by low to moderate income families and lack of education of
minimum housing and property maintenance standards for low to moderate income
households. Property and housing conditions in older neighborhoods will continue to
decline without constant code enforcement and education efforts.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual
information.
Mitigation of blighted/substandard housing conditions,property nuisances and fire
hazards and property maintenance and blight elimination education of residents of
low to moderate income areas.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs(Attachment B)-what Goal,Strategy,Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal# V Strategy# 2 Objective# I Outcome# 3
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A.High Priority ® B.Average Priority ❑ C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Mitigation of blight conditions,
property nuisances and fire hazards in homes and properties located in the affected
census districts.
5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box-a,b,c,d)
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 201.0
201-All 100-600
202- All 100-300
203-ALL 100400
Census Tract # 20L 202, 203, 204 Block Groups # 204 ALL 100-600
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees.
6. Provide a map showing the location of the project or service area.
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form €x :1 (1
CODE ENFORCEMENT
CENSUS BLOCK %LOW/MODERATE
TRACT GROUP INCOME PERSONS
201 ALL 7496
700 6&8
30 0.5
400 778
500 81.2
600 778
202 ALL 75.0
100 861
f' x
3000 0 M9
F �
s
203 ALL 62:8
d r�1 100 769
r 200 12.4
" 300 75.0
203 �� e 400 460
204 ALL 698
100 823
300 8&4
400 78.0
� 564
26 1
. tea
r �r
CO,
t�4 41
s
F
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates - the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
* Public Service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FIE jobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
1" Quarter 125 Houses $96.00 $12,000
2nd Quarter 125 Houses $96.00 $12,000
3` Quarter 125 Houses $96.00 $12,000
4` Quarter 125 Houses $96,00 $12,000
TOTAL 500 Houses 1 $96.00 1 $48,000
8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income 245444
Number of clients below 50% median income 77034
Number of clients below 80% median income 101244
Number of elderly clients 11998
Number of minority clients 169731
Number of disabled clients Unknown
Total Pasco residents served 24,444
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco $48,000 $48,000 $48,000 $48,000
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
The impact of code enforcement and blight abatement activities will be the reduction of 125
blighted properties each quarter in the affected census districts. The success of the abatement
activity on each affected property will be verified by code enforcement officers with
photographs and a file of the case documentation will be maintained in the City's Inspection
Services Division.
8
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the
maximum eligible) . These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009IHUT? incaiue" Limit Guidelines fur.,Kennewicic =P sc;4 - Ricl and.
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6
p p p p People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $195450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $469650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 1 $51,800 $58,300 1 $64,800 1 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: 487000 17,025 LOCAL 65,025
Salaries
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
(Describe)
TOTAL 1 48,000 177025 1 LOCAL 65,025
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: Yes. The other funds will be
paid from the City's general fund.
14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
Nuisance conditions in census tract properties occupied by low-to-moderate income families
will remain unabated and the neighborhoods will continue to deteriorate and fewer persons
will be served.
9
Pasco CDBG Application Form 1 20 1 1)
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time,supplies,etc.,what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
16. Check"yes"or"no"for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction/renovation? ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure/housing/facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas,writings,items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
��o,�
uG / y - Z
Sig ture o T Authorized Agency Official Printed Name Est Title Date
10
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant City of Pasco-Public Works
Address (21.201) Parts of Kurtzman Park Neighborhood
Project Name Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Improvements - Phase Il(CT201BG4)
Contact Person Michael McShane - City Engineer
Telephone 545-3444 Fax
Federal Tax ID Number
CDBG Funds Requested $300,000 Match
1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
CDBG funds are used to provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and roadway improvements in low-
income neighborhood (Census Tract 201).
2 . Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual
information.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # 11 Strategy # IL1 Objective # Suitable Outcome # Availabili
Living ty/Accessi
Environm bility
ent
4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority:
Al - Bricks & Mortar Project resulting in visual physical improvements (engineering &
architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project
cost.) Reduce Barriers, Public Facilities, Neighborhood Revititalization
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
LMA - 570.208(a)(1)
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # 201 Block Groups #
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
* Public Scrvice / Housing - Unit o1 measure is pcopic * Homchw - Unit ol mcasurc is households
* Rchabila at ion - Unit of mcasurc is houses * Economic Daiclopmcni - Unit o(measurc is FTEjobs and/ or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
151 Quarter People
2" Quarter
3r Quarter
4" Quarter
TOTAL
S. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income 11500
Number of clients below 50% median income 1,320
Number of clients below 80% median income 1,200
Number of elderly clients 236
Number of minority clients 11181
Number of disabled clients Unknown
Total Pasco residents served 1,575
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco $294,175 $138,750 $100,000
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
In FY-2009, the CDBG program used $ 300,000 to install curb, gutter, sidewalks and improve
roadway in low income neighborhood providing safe routes for neighborhood residents (Census
Tract 201) .
Persons in lower-income neighborhoods have improved quality of life as indicated by improvements
to basic infrastructure.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs ( 80% is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick Pasco - Richland
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15550 $17,500 $191450 $21,000 $221550 $24,100 $251650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $321400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $647300 $68,450
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $6400 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $851500
12 . Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL:
Salaries
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION: $300,000
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
(Describe)
TOTAL
13 . Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
The project will be delayed until funds are secured.
15 . If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
N/A
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑
a. Do you own the property? ® ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) .
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
MCS A Ali j� brl)'
Si nature of Authorized Agency'Official Printed Name ass Title Date
8
S
Y
i
Ad.t
y
ill � i7Y �
Y 1 �
.s 1�
� P
� ?d
r
t 365.3�' � � -• � �, ._;
i t
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant City of Pasco-Administrative&z Community SenRECEIVED
Address 525 N Third Avenue (21.202) JUN n 1 2009
Project Name Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist
COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC OEVEWPMENT
Contact Person Stan Strebel,Administrative&z Community Services
Telephone (509)545-5757 Fax (509) 543-5758
Federal Tax ID Number
CDBG Funds Requested $37,500 Match $45,500
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist
at the Youth Civic Center.This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for
youth at risk covering low-to-moderate income Census Tract (202).
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual
information.
There are significant numbers of youth from low to moderate income families who are
Considered at risk that benefit from participating in supervised recreation programs.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs(Attachment B)-what Goal,Strategy,Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal# V Strategy# V.2 Objective# Suitable Outcome# Availabili
Living ty/Accessi
Environm bility
ent
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A.High Priority ❑ B.Average Priority X❑ C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Providing quality programs such as the girl scouts,
soccer tournaments,basketball tournaments and other recreational activities will improve
the physical condition and build self esteem of youth. In addition such activities create an
environment in which youth feel cared for and safe,which greatly reduces the possibility
of youth being involved in negative outside influences such as gang activity.
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
B2 - Social Service Projects to address community needs (seniors, special needs,
disadvantaged youth) .
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
LMA - 570.208(a)(1)
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # 202 Block Groups # All
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
*Public Service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer— Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FTEjobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
I't Quarter 1,410 People 6.65 91375
2 Id Quarter 11410 People 6.65 91375
3 Quarter 11410 People 6.65 91375
4` Quarter 11410 People 1 6.65 91375
TOTAL 51640 People 1 6.65 37,500
8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income
Number of clients below 50% median income
Number of clients below 80% median income 4229
Number of elderly clients
Number of minority clients
Number of disabled clients
Total Pasco residents served 5640
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco 30000 33,000 35,000 37,500
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $30,000 for a recreation specialist at this community center
for the purpose of making a suitable living environment available to school age children that attend
Lower-income households have improved quality of life through provision of necessities for their
health and social well-being. We will make contact with the police department to detemine if there
is less gang related activities in the surrounding area due to the community center being open.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
I Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 1 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 1 $70,000 1 $75,200 1 $80,400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: 37,500 19,100 City General Fund 56,600
Salaries
OPERATIONS: 24,000 City General Fund 267400
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER.
(Describe)
TOTAL 37,500 45,500 83,000
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe: City General Fund
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
If other funding is not available, activities may be reduced if sufficient staff is not available
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
Programming will be continued as long as funding is available.
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ X
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑ X
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? X ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? X ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ X
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ X
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ X
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑ x
a. Do you own the property? ❑ ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (choose one)
a. Public Service X
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) .
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
8
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
SUBMITTED BY:
STA Al S7xeVL
Signature of Aut rized Agency Official Printed Name & Title Date
9
a xz q
]yy. It e5
4if 5 i %A 8tt� fl�V jfCt ��i... K •_� e. +'1' �•
It I
it
4
t to tiz
ZI
Ilt
P.
M
I-It 11
fi c
s zP
F+ ] ' " ' "l.z y C 3 W
'Sr YwyvTt. . 'Ki Pa,r�
It
It
.� • o-, a �r� _ 5} 11 et� i "
9' �' F• }S�1e,r '� ° }' '+ s
�7P `tSf' t. STr.SFt
3
t- 2 a tJ 3 - d Ave WdscbAla VA# ' 9303 ' `
Vt
».
V ,„vry
k b 47l .k
I
.._ .. ? VVv'� Fk S yi 1E� S. f fit' . !� .# c]. kj ov , s$ 3�i( _µ ,'` It tt,
ataw , " _It
' "
'F .
y? t3 ix i kty ] a
Ij
It
3
5'1 . .Y 11 p
Irk
6 t
It
.p
It
It
tt
a a u
3 !
ii w v F a Olt a'
14 1
tIt
PrI
41, 11 } n
'ly , _IC � o �tiiaC �J 'ti
4y
it
Vt
�Y, ♦ y: �tE °a-d
f 4t � a` ? B 1R'2s'� .. «- &' 1.4 ham+^` 'M1 tt
�Yinni<iC 4b` 1F. � 6- 17 " 'N if3 ' �5 i . bo' Al r 1 3E :I v ^,ih ° Iq 'l q. 1 I ' � ,E ;u ] fL
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Pro9EGMED
Applicant City of Pasco-Administrative&r Community Services _JUN �1009
Address 205 South Wehe(21.201)
Project Name Martin Luther King Community Center RecreationIMMsECONOMiC DEVELOPMENT
Contact Person Stan Strebel,Administrative&rCommunity Services Director
Telephone 509-543-5757 Fax 509-543-5758
Federal Tax ID Number
CDBG Funds Requested $37,500 Match $100,500
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation
specialist at the Martin Luther King.This facility's program is coordinated with the
YMCA,Salvation Army and Campfire USA,who all collaborate to provide education and
physical activities to school age children and youth in Census Tract(201).
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual
information.
There are a significant numbers of youth from low to moderate income families who are
considered at-risk that benefit from participation in supervised recreational programs
and activities.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B)-what Goal,Strategy,Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal# V Strategy# V.2 Objective# Suitable Outcome# Availabili
Living ty/Access
Environm ibility
ent
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A.High Priority ❑ B.Average Priority ® C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Will provide structured and supervised
Recreational activities such as Indoor Soccer Basketball Volleyball Art&t Crafts.This will offer a
positive outlet for youth and giving them an alternative rather then turning to gangs and other illegal
activities With the addition of Cyber Stop which in a community based internet&r Computer lab
which operates 6 days a week for neighborhood&s community patrons to have the opportunity to
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
access the internet to search for emplg3 ent and to discover other resources that the users may not
have been able for to access in the past due to not havin this his resource.
B2 - Social Service Projects to address community needs (seniors, special needs,
disadvantaged youth) .
5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
LMA - 570.208(a)(1)
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # 201 Block Groups # All
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated persons
will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflateyour estimates —
the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
* Public Service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FfE jobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
Is` Quarter 1451 People $9375.00
2" Quarter 1451 People $9375.00
3 Quarter 1451 People $9375.00
4 Ih Quarter 1452 People $9375.00
TOTAL 5805 People $37,500.00
8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the following
criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income
Number of clients below 50% median income
Number of clients below 80% median income 4330
Number of elderly clients
Number of minority clients
Number of disabled clients
Total Pasco residents served 5805
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form ( 2010
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco 30,000 33,000 35,000 37,300
10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $30,000 for a recreation specialist at this community
center for the purpose of making a suitable living environment available to school age children &
Adults who attend the programs and activities offered at the MLKC.
Lower-income households have improved quality of life through provision of necessities for their
health and social well-being.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland.
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $419500 $46,650 $51,850 $569000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $705000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you
will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG
funds requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: 37500 30,500 City General 68,000
Salaries Fund
OPERATIONS: City General
Rent/Lease 35,000 Fund 357000
Utilities 41000 41000
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER: City General
(Describe) 31,000 Fund 31,000
TOTAL 37,500 1009500 138,000
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please
describe:
City General Fund
14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
If other funding is not available, activities may be reduced if sufficient staff is not available
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to
secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the
general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
Programming will be continued as long as funding is available.
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑ ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) .
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
8
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
SUBMITTED BY:
,5rAr✓ %5vrxz4ffz,
mczz 44Z 6 mac. -4ikE. c rok-
Signature ofAuthorized Agency Official Printed Name & Title Date
9
i �� �
...
i 9�iS t ryC t �.,� ; s�"i 3i�s
ix � :' G� O � m* p ��� tea' •y'�4
r
}
Ida
0
IT
s
ttl
E -
it 5 " ,Z••F a I a ,
if dyStf ' Bl� ij. liTIAl Y_,.L_
Oil
r e,_ AII
IT
m
r � k
1 • f$i
t �
r Ali
t Th. ". is i �l ° . {� C' `.G. ��rf k� 1 Y�V4, r� JCC � t� A 99301
NA, ,
c� - 45 'mac *4 SY
c het: j
p
ai+ - ^- ° 41A.. tl
r .[43 -7l ' C_E>c " kern ' C
S ? _
e Ir
r
ri - .J
x i{ m
ft}b �' S wa iF -
Y
II,Ao i kI IT 1 It 'v
( ,
16`� jt a Est ,e •.. o ,
I nitod,
..
Y. yai Fi 1
� IjH l
4
A A-
I Ili 1�fi5� t -, -x-
2
-- - :rta k CE y '
'
s iiri Y.F
` o ' 1
31s�7.
91^ 9 v 5 ; ( T
�-
Pasco CDBG Application Form 1 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant City of Pasco-Administrative&Community Services
Address 1315 North 7th,Pasco (21.201,202, 203,204). RECEIVED
Project Name Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist JUN 0 1 2009
Contact Person
r�ru�sei�NP �GBNghgIG44 r�nn�n``-acr
�ORImOI9TTr�LTA7T4QRRrOCPL CQf'IVI'CT7!
Telephone Fax
Federal Tax ID Number
CDBG Funds Requested 37500 Match 200000
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
CDBG funds are used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist
to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides
supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly with support
services,nutrition,health and living skills support.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual
information.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B)-what Goal,Strategy,Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal# V Strategy# V.2 Objective# Suitable Outcome# Availabili
Living ty/Accessi
Environm bility
ent
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy(Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A.High Priority ❑ B.Average Priority ❑ C.Low Priority ❑ D.No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority:
B2 - Social Service Projects to address community needs (seniors,special needs,
disadvantaged youth).
5. How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
LMC - 570.208(a)(2)
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # Block Groups # All
C, ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
* Public service/Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Dcvclopmcnt — Unit of measure is FIE jobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
1" Quarter 816 People 11.49 97375
2 rid Quarter 816 People 11.49 91375
3 Quarter 816 People 11.49 91375
Euarter 816 People 11.49 9,375
AL 3265 People 11.49 37,500
8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income
Number of clients below 50% median income
Number of clients below 80% median income 3265
Number of elderly clients 3265
Number of minority clients
Number of disabled clients
Total Pasco residents served 3265
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco 20000 27500 31250 29000
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $20,000 for a recreation specialist at this community center
for the purpose of making a suitable living environment available to seniors and disabled
persons that attend.
Lower-income households have improved quality of life through provision of necessities for their
health and social well-being.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick'- Pasco - Richland
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 1 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: 136,000
Salaries 37,500 99,000 City General Fund
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities 36,000 City General Fund 36,000
Supplies 131000 City General Fund 13,000
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
(Describe) 601000 City General Fund 60,000
TOTAL 377000 208,000 I 2451000
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
City General Fund
14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
you do?
If other funding is not available, activities may be reduced if sufficient staff not available.
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
Programming will be continued as long as funding is available.
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑ ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) .
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
8
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
STA A -57A AAoe-
A4wC.W3 D/Rze.roAt, S - Z9 ` 07
Signature V'Iffiorized Agency Official Printed Name &t Title Date
9
If '$i • j x t ':T xY, at' v i x;, f `w` ` : ' pdx"Y.� & o- d }� Ynb�s� 3 °.
.y � ��,+ Y *a:
$ `4 $ .F is �f' -u 4rx.: rfw P ; t 3 ` r f
> iffilOfdl s'U8' ` t rd r F c sf r l r j . .� ice,
'& e imp { sx s /t h
IT-
P ��r ? _� ! t.� yP x � v t v r" 1
It
���P.wu°``.'., s"° . s tP � t�`FI 1PG / t ?.�u�"'L'°."ti"Sr F'Ilk
TPF ` g pp F C P
it
If
' 41 111 If
IIr
1 -13 t 114
If 5
If-
If Xf
IT
If
Ea - ,
y ?S .{: t ate3�.w .,u `,`°`11.3h�.:4 V'�ar 1 t �`9 4 £
g
:' 1 Ruby Strom t r p
u i r f IT
jx f ' '. S *, . , . m e
T
-. Ill i. u.3..,.. l k t x t x a j tff..fT If
Ilk,manY„ {.2�i.",
If I
{
".�4' � 4f K'by •. f^ft t yyy� kt 4' .
If "Net
41 T
Tf
R ^'
et a C t
Ji
If
1 s ! 5 N att A € PW� GO VJA 9930 `
1 s ;
i
mr Ir, x. f, t dY
"» a '^ f t; T s it ♦ 6• yt rg 1 . P p Sit,
Iffl
Tr if
dl
r
r y fy, Ay (y
T
L Ile
If
r t ,
.' — ?y i3
6� t r iii i ;�
Y F
N
P
If
It
ILL
r i4
_
Y.
� T f J �`
e9t' Mar � tr�et�a � tF. ef�"
.„ _ - ,yr _ — _
t txy 'J i
OrWju
If I
ITT
IN
t
TT-
IT
i� T{ t tl (• fl' �. a.: +3 a. ° .,�.+, t
tr t «...._ _
11 y� ^I III '`� e1 k RP it e �( ' Cr 9 t .ilGlu :rtt ai ' .+ r',t.— "'��� 1.. V 4 Ifl If
raoirtft r -:C:',Y . 2_ a5 `� tic 1 '"aV'r xii� o '.iF9 ! f: trc lire nk 4 i i l > 9h Cfu . � 1t 3h70 ft.
r
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant Pasco Downtown Development
Address 110 S. 4th Ave. Pasco,Washington 99301
Project Name Pasco Specialty Kitchen
Contact Person Victoria Silvernail
Telephone 509-5454172 Fax 509-5454174
Federal Tax ID Number 91-1290894
CDBG Funds Requested 65,000.00 Match 40,420.00
1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly will the CDBG funds
be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
Describe your project and its location:
In 2002 both groups, the City of Pasco, Washington and the Downtown Development
Association, partnered on the development of an incubator kitchen to create specialty food
businesses; that is now the Pasco Specialty Kitchen (PSK) 110 S. 4th Ave. Pasco. This
property replaced two blighted properties and brought the possibility of new jobs and
small businesses to a low to moderate income population. PSK helps small businesses with
an affordable infrastructure, educational support and guidance with business decisions and
marketing plans. PSK offer assistance to clients in the following areas:
■ Local, State and Federal Licensing
■ Insurance
■ Permits
■ Labeling & Packaging
■ Training Facility for Special Permits
■ Marketing
■ Business & Marketing Planning
PSK has developed excellent working relationships with local commerce resources such as
Columbia Basin Community Business Center, Benton Franklin Development Council and
SCORE thusly providing a unique one-stop shop for new businesses. Assistance is provided
to help clients understand their position in the market. Ongoing marketing by PSK
provides client product exposure in both retail and wholesale markets in the Pacific
Northwest , the world by way of PSK7s WEB site.
PSK has the following Certifications and Approvals from the state of Washington:
■ Department of Health
■ Department of Agriculture
■ Organic Certification For Food Preparation and Processing
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
What exactly will the CDBG funds be used for:
PSK offers potential new businesses access to an affordably and certified commercial
kitchen to develop and perfect their products. Commercial food preparation equipment can
be so costly in a start up business it can be the deciding point of not developing a business.
Funding for food service businesses is extremely difficult to obtain from lending
institutions for experienced food businesses and near impossible for startup operators.
PSK is a Low Cost Pay Per Hour concept permitting people with very little available risk
capital to incrementally develop and market food products in a real commercial kitchen 24
hours a day 7days a week and 365 days a year. This has permitted PSK's clients to bootstrap
themselves into a self sustaining food service ventures be it retail or as a wholesaler to
grocery outlets. Without PSK's resources these low income individuals would find it
impossible to experience success as an entrepreneur. PSK's clients represent a wide
ethnicity with African American, Hispanic, Asian and Caucasian present.
The PSK facility is a 11,000 square foot building located in downtown Pasco. The building
houses the equipment and resources shown below:
■ 4 Convection ovens
■ Walk4n Freezer
■ Walk4n Refrigerator
■ Commercial Bread Mixers
■ Compartmentalized Lockable Storage Space
■ 2 Stove Top Ranges with Lower Ovens
• Wireless Internet Access
■ Client's Product Store
The funding is critical for the growth of our clients and the continued operation of PSK.
This grant helps pay the following expenses;
■ 1 Full Time and Part-Time salary
■ Payroll Taxes
■ Administrative Expenditures
■ Equipment Purchases
■ Administrative Services Contracts
This grant makes it possible for small business to keep their start-up cost affordable. We
charge the clients an affordable fee for kitchen time, freezer and refrigeration space and dry
storage. Keeping these costs affordable is vital to the success of our small business clients.
We need to keep this valuable asset in operation for the City of Pasco and our local
economy.
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Description of persons you will be serving:
We have clients that are Low to moderate income; Pasco High Students, Elderly and
Retired Owners, Women Head of Household and Minorities. In addition to our regular
clients, we provide space for high school students learning about the food processing
business and how to create a specialty food business. They learn to create products, food
costs, packaging marketing. The Kitchen serves as a base for Pasco High School
Commercial Foods Academy that provides educational training related to the food industry
and entrepreneurship. Our Pasco High has 62% of their students are low-moderate income.
This program is a base for future small businesses in our area it open the prospect of future
business growth and the creation of more low to moderate jobs
This is an economic development tool designed to create jobs and accelerate growth and
success of small businesses through business support, resources and services. Our
incubator businesses create jobs revitalize neighborhoods add new products to the market
and strengthen our local economy.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual
information.
56% of Pasco is Latino with 38% is low to moderate income Source: US Census 2000
47% Latino owned and operated businesses engage in service related business activity and
44% engage in retail type activities. Source: Profile of Downtown Pasco, 2000, Broz
PSK addresses the unmet need in our community by:
■ Supporting activities that improve the quality of the local workforce and prepare
lower income workers to access living wage jobs.
■ Provides incubation resources and assistance to burgeoning entrepreneurs, micro-
enterprise and other food industry based businesses.
Pasco is in the heart of a large agricultural area with over 350 fresh products seasonally
available. Small businesses utilize these products to create retail and wholesale products
that when added to the local commerce create jobs and strengthens our local economy.
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # 1 Strategy # 4&5 Objective # 1&4&5 Outcome # 3
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority X B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: A. High Priority
By providing an affordable commercial incubator kitchen a food facility and assistance to
business development, marketing and training. The PSK(located in downtown Pasco)
meets the following; Strategic Action Plan Goals:
* Goal 1.Stategy #1 Support business that create permanent jobs for low-moderate
income residents
Goal 1. Strategy #4 Support activities that improve the quality of local workforce and
prepare lower income and special needs workers to access living wage.
* Goal 1. Strategy #5 Support facilities, infrastructures or other eligible improvements
to assist businesses that need economic development assistance by virtue of their
qualifying physical, environment, economic or demographic conditions; to create
living wage jobs and/or economic opportunities.
* Objective # 3 Create Economic Opportunity - This objective applies to the type of
Activities related to economic development commercial revitalization or job creation
Our Proposal satisfies: A. High Priority as an economic development project resulting
in the creation of jobs through as affordable rental facility business
development, educational training and work skill location in downtown Pasco
8
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
b. Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # 202 Block Groups #
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. X Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderateAncome employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many
unduplicated persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or
retained. Do not inflate your estimates - the numbers provided will he used to assess your
proposed project 's success.
•Public Service/Housing - Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer - Unit of treasure is households
• Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development - Unit of measure is FrE jobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
1st Quarter 11 51FTE 6PT $1477.28 $16250.00
2n Quarter 13 5FTE 8PT $1250.00 $16250.00
3rd Quarter 14 5FTE 9PT $1160.72 $16250.00
4 th Quarter 11 5FTE 6PT $1477.72 $16250.00
TOTAL 35FTE 35FTE $65000.00
8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by
the following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income 12
Number of clients below 50% median income 8
Number of clients below 80% median income 6
Number of elderly clients 2
Number of minority clients 19
Number of disabled clients
Total Pasco residents served 35
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
9
12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA:
INSERT MAP HERE
A: 110 S 4th Ave, Pasco, WA 99301-5507 --,
MAP1QWES': W Henry St <'; W rtibt��s2t J p�4U m ft
z St �a
tet St .A �
Sylvester C>
Park Gtk St ��,
St 15hoMan St rirev St
W e W� ille 5t
a t��vtts
�t ri'p A Go6ume"'
a
Z Z
st Z W t e St
Z N 9 q 3 7 sY
'Ile
CA
�c� W+rolumh�
U' rap�ih St a'� r
u, d• W �
� � h
es WASt a
c �
Lq W B St - � 1 E 8
Mercier { E C
to AinS ,Utrh Park r i�
Q sr �Q
,C, a 4C az �t3
02006MapQuest) c. ,L �� Map Data 802008NAVTEQt or TPIeAtlas
soft
t wamL-al.�--rjj-, 1�.,
r %.
MAP CURRENT BUILDING PREVIOUS BUILDINGS
CONVERTED TO THE PASCO
-E- SPECIALTY KITCHEN
2009 CDBG Application-Electronic _ Page 4
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco 65,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 65,000.00
10 What impact will your project have in the community2 How will you measure your success?
Our agriculture community produces 350 products!
Create jobs for low to moderate income residents accelerate growth and success of small
business. Our incubator businesses create jobs revitalize neighborhoods add new products
to the market and strengthen our local economy.
The lowest income in the Tri-Cities is Pasco 38% of the households make less that
25,000.00 a year. Our facility helps create jobs and facilitate small business owners that
have jobs and are willing to invest in their own small business with help from our project
we can help and have helped businesses succeed
We measure our success by the 30 plus Active clients now using the Commercial incubator
Kitchen also the 53 jobs we have created 33 jobs are low to moderate 62% and our
requirement is 51%. Our project has created 17 services and more than 80 products that we
still support and have continued to increase our products each year with the growth of our
clients and the addition of new clients every year.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is
the maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $25,900 $297150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $517850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 1 $6000 1 $70,000 $75,200 1 $80,400 $85,500
10
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds
you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds
you will use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of
CDBG funds requested and all other source funds.
Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Expense Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: 337500.00 0 38,000.00
Salaries 4500.00
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease Clients pay for
Utilities 177440.00 use 17,440.00
Supplies 1000.00 2500.00 Of the PSK 3500.00
And our Retail
Shop
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials 0
129000.00 121000.00
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
41000.00 10,000.00 Clients pay for 14,000.00
(Describe)Adim 109000.00 use 107000.00
Equipment 10,480.00 Of the PSK 10,480.00
All other And our Retail
Expenses Shop
TOTAL 65,000.00 40,420.00 105,420.00
13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please
describe:
We have the source of income from our Clients usage fee and also our Retail Shop. We also
have a contract with the Pasco High School for their Commercial Foods Academy they have a
block of time they use though the school year for their marketing and product creation class.
We are always looking for additional sources of income.
14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what
will you do? We would have to revisit our budget and have to make some very difficult
decisions on equipment needs of the Clients. We would have to consider reducing our hours
of operation.
11
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc., what is your plan to
secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are
the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
We will continue to expand our client base. This year we are looking into the possibility of the
High School expanding their program to 2 classes. We are continually researching other
funding sources.
The possibility of expanding the kitchen; possibly another location that would contain 24 full
kitchens that these clients could have a soft step into a full time kitchen at a incubator cost we
would hope to partner with the Port of Pasco or the City of Pasco
16 Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the sub recipient new to the CDBG program? ❑ X
2. Is this a new activity for the sub recipient? ❑ X
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? X ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? X ❑
3. Does the sub recipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ X
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? El X
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? El X
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ❑ X
a. Do you own the property? ❑ X
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑ X
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development X
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities ❑
12
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and are not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
4igna a of Authorized Age y Official Printed Name & Title Date May 28, 2009
Victoria Silvernail
Executive Director
13
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application
2010 CDBG Program Year
Economic Development Special Attachment #2
Complete this page if you are proposing to provide an "Economic Development" project
1. Please list the DUNS Number of your
business: #147706498
2. This is a: X non-profit ❑ for-profit ❑ faith-based
3. Describe how your project will make the most effective use of CDBG funds?
This is an economic development tool designed to create jobs and accelerate growth and
success of small businesses through business support, resources and services. Our incubator
businesses create jobs revitalize neighborhoods add new products to the market and
strengthen our local economy.
4. Is there leverage of other
funds?
We have a fee structure a user fee that we charge the clients of the kitchen and we have retail
sales that adds to our funds. We also have a contract with the Pasco School District for the
Commercial Food Academy that uses the kitchen for their class. We are constantly looking for
additional funding sources. We are continually adding new clients
5. How will you assure that CDBG funds are not substituted for other non-federal investment?
We understand the allowable expenses for these funds. Salary, administration costs,
equipment, lease rentals, travel. We also have a complete monthly balancing report for the
Pasco Downtown Development Association accounting department.
6. Can you demonstrate that your project will meet the minimum federal CDBG threshold of
providing one full time equivalency job (32 hours per week) per $35,000 of CDBG funds, or
provide goods or services to residents of a low-moderate income (LMI) area, such that the
number of LMI persons residing in the area served amounts to at least one LMI person per $350
of CDBG investment, and that at least more than one half (51%) of the total jobs created will be
filled by very low, low and moderate income persons? How will you make sure that the jobs
will be made available to very low, low and moderateAncome persons?
Every year we have created more than the required jobs. In 2008 we created 41-FTE and 7 were
low to moderate income and our funds for the 2008 CDBG Grant was $50,000.00. We work
with each and every client and have forms that they sign that they will make the jobs created
available to low- moderate labor force first. We also have graduates of the Paso Specialty
Kitchen that are adding new jobs and they have also signed forms to hire low to moderate first
and they have done just that.
15
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
7. Is your request being used for business incentives or for recruitment of a business from another
city or state? If yes, describe in detail. Are the proposed jobs existing positions or are they
new?
We do except clients from the Tri-City area they are new jobs except with our graduates
some are new as they expand and some are exiting position being filled we only count the
NEW jobs
S. Show the number of new permanent jobs projected to be created (seasonal jobs do not count):
24 FTE 22PT 11 FTE = 35FTE Projected
job Title # FTE jobs Created # Part Time jobs # FTE jobs Filled # Part Time jobs
Created by LMI Filled by LMI
Caterer 4 FTE 4 PT 1 FTE LMI 4 PT LMI
Waiter/Waitress 6 FTE 6 PT 8 FTE LMI 6 PT LMI
Food Service 9 FTE 6 PT 10 FTE LMI 6 PT LMI
Worker
Cook 4FTE 4PT 2FTE LMI 4PT LMI
Sales 1 FTE 2 PT 2PT LMI
Re resentative
** LMI jobs refer to anyjob that can be held by a person with no advanced training or education beyond
high school - or a job that the business agrees to hire unquah ed persons for and provide training.
16
1
2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant Pasco Downtown Development Association-PDDA
Address Pasco Downtown (21. 202)
Project Name Downtown Facade Improvement (4 facades)
Contact Person Gloria Garcia
Telephone 509-545 -0738 Fax 509-545- 8801
Federal Tax ID Number 914290894
CDBG Funds Requested 80000 Match 20000
1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
CDBG funds are used to support business to continue downtown facade improvements, for
new projects are anticipated for 2009 (Census Tract 202) .
2 . Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual
information.
Pasco's downtown commercial district serves an area of Pasco with primarily low-to-mod
residents . The area contains old commercial buildings in need of rehabilitation. This
rehabilitation is expected to increase business flow and improve area appearance.
3 . Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # 1 Strategy # 1.5 Objective # Economic Outcome # Sustainab
Opportun ility
ity
4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ® B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑ D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority:
Al - Bricks &t Mortar Project resulting in visual physical improvements (engineering &z
architectural design and inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project
cost. ) Reduce Barriers, Public Facilities, Neighborhood Revititalization
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
5
I
i
2010
LMA - 570.208(a)(1)
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b . ® Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # 202 Block Groups #
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
* Public Service I Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homcbuycr — Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation — Unit of measure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FIEjobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
Is' Quarter People
2 Id Quarter
3r Quarter
M
8. Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income
Number of clients below 50% median income
Number of clients below 800/o median income
Number of elderly clients
Number of minority clients
Number of disabled clients
Total Pasco residents served 1
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco 80000
6
201. 0
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
In FY-2009, the CDBG program spent $2,000 to rehabilitate owner-occupied businesses in a
targeted area for the purpose of sustaining economic development.
Lower-income residents obtain or retain living wage jobs and/or access economic opportunities.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
W800/0 $361300 erson 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $24,100 $25,650
2,700 $25,900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
$41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $641800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: 80,000 20,000
Salaries
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION: 80,000 207000 Participants
Engineering Match
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
(Describe)
TOTAL $80,000 $80,000 $20,000
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
It is anticipated that 4 facades will be improved with $ 80,000, but if full request funding is not
received then impact will be adjusted accordingly.
7
2 € 10
15 . If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc. , what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ® El-
5 . Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s) .
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
Gloria Garcia, Vice-President 06/01/2009
Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name & Title Date
8
t.i•• �\. t: 1 \ ��
dW
r V. _ . 1
SA
\
-=� .�/.\ �• .fit°" ..-�'. \ � �5���
N `' �'•\ Legend
f._._j Z6ne 2 Boundary
Downtown Pasco Business Improvement District
January 2006
The yellow highlighted area indicates the area
of 4th& Lewis.
RECEIVED Pasco CDBG Application Form 1010
COMMUNICbMW MifWfDavelopment Block Grant Application — 2010 Program
Year
Applicant Benton Franklin Community Action Committee
Address 720 West Court Pasco WA 99352
Project Name Energy Efficient Healthy House Program
Contact Person David Odom or Judith A. Gidley
Telephone 509-545-4042 Fax 509-545-1449
Federal Tax ID Number 91-0792238
CDBG Funds $20,000 Match $20,000
Requested
1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will
be used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
1. This proposal's goal is to increase the energy efficiency of homes owned or
rented by low-income households; to correct combustion related indoor air
quality problems and to provide energy conservation education to the low-
income consumer. The Washington State Office of Community, Trade and
Economic Development sponsors the Energy Matchmakers Program authorized
through Chapter 70.164 RCW. The program is designed to leverage matching
funds, and a community can participate by providing a dollar for dollar match.
We use an existing energy conservation program format of policies and
specifications developed by BFCAC and DCTED. Households to be served
would be the very low-income (50% of median). We have a list of eligible
households who have already qualified and add to this list through referrals of
new households from our Energy Assistance Program. Although energy
conservation programs have been operating for 25 years through local electric
utilities, combustion heated housing has been ignored, even though they are
usually the oldest, least efficient homes. By taking advantage of this opportunity
for leverage funds, this program can help as many as ten households cost-
effectively, and make available additional revenue to the local economy at a
time when other resources are dwindling.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual
information.
BFCAC administers Energy Conservation programs, which serves low-income
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 1 2010
residence who are either elderly, disabled and/or families with young children living
in the City of Pasco . These programs have limited funding for homes with
combustion heating sources (oil , gas , propane , and wood ) .
3 . Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal , Strategy, Objective
and Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # IV Strategy # 2 Objective # 2 Outcome # 2
4 . Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ❑ B . Average Priority C . Low Priority ® D . No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that
priority
It satisfies C in preserving affordable housing by making them more durable , energy
efficient and correcting health and safety problems .
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-
income persons? (Check only one box — a, b, c, d)
a . ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b . ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # Block Groups #
c. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele : (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d . ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6 . Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7 . Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010 . For example , how many
unduplicated persons will be served , how many homes assisted , how many jobs created or
retained . Do not inflate your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your
proposed project's success.
* Public Service / Housing - Unit of measure is
people * Homebuyer - Unit of measure is households
* Economic Development - Unit of measure is
* Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses FTE jobs and / or businesses
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
15 Quarter
2 Quarter
3` Quarter
4 Quarter 8 8 $2 ,500 $20,000
TOTAL 8 8 $2 ,500 $20,000
8 . Of the total " number served" listed in the above table , please categorize your clientele
by the following criteria :
Number of clients below 30% median income
Number of clients below 50% median income Eight households
Number of clients below 80% median income
Number of elderly clients Two households
Number of minority clients Four households
Number of disabled clients Two households
Total Pasco residents served Eight households
9 . What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000
Richland 15, 000 15,000 11 ,000 9,400
Pasco 20, 000 20,000 20,000 20,000
10 What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your
success?
Provide eight households with energy efficiency and healthy homes .
11 The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80%
is the maximum eligible) . These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010 .
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $ 13,600 15,550 $17, 500 $ 19,450 $21 ,000 $22 , 550 $24, 100 $25,650
50% $229700 $25,900 $29, 150 $32,400 $35,000 $37 ,600 $40,200 $42 , 750
80% $369300 $41 ,500 $46,650 $519850 $560000 $60, 150 $64,300 $682450
Media $45 ,400 $51 ,800 $58 ,300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,500
n
12 Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
funds you are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses . List any other sources
of funds you will use to match with the CDBG funds . Your total expenses should equal the
amount of CDBG funds requested and all other source funds .
Expense Requested Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
CDBG Funds Funds
PERSONNEL : $19000 $79800.00 WA State $8, 800
Salaries Energy
Matchmaker
OPERATIONS : $500800 $500
Rent/Lease $200.00 $200
Utilities $50800 $50.00 $ 100
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION : $189950.00 $ 11 ,450 .00 $309400.00
Engineering
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase
Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
( Describe)
TOTAL $209000 $209000 $40,000
13 Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please
describe :
Yes
14 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request ,
what will you do?
If only a portion of the request is received then fewer homes will be completed .
15 If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time , supplies , etc. , what is your plan
to secure funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects
that are the general responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
The staff time in the CDBG budget is estimated to cover environmental reviews , lead
clearances and reporting which are requirements of HUD but not Energy Matchmaker
Funds .
8
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
16 Check "yes" or " no" for each of the following questions :
Assessment Question
I s Z No
I . Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program?
2 . Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3 . Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5 . Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation ? ® ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage ® ❑
requirements?
7 . What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities
Certifications and Assurances
[/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to
which it is attached , understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the
continuing compliance with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or
continuation of the related contract(s) .
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received
without penalty and is not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or
ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration .
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this
Proposal or any pre-award costs . All Proposals will become the property of the City, and [/we
claim no proprietary right to the ideas , writings , items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
. Judith A. Gidle , Executive Director 5 a o
gnature of Authorized Agency of)(ciaf Printed Name & Title Date
9
i
RECEI V w Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
COMMUNITY&ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant Habitat for Humanity Tri Cities aka Tri County Partners Habitat for
Human
Address 313 Wellsian Way,Richland WA 99352
Project Name A Brush With Kindness
Contact Person Theresa Richardson,Executive Director
Telephone 509/943-5555 Fax 509/943-1693
Federal Tax ID Number
Match GIK/Volunteers/Private
CDBG Funds Requested $24,000 Funds
1. Describe your project and its proposed location,including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for,a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
A Brush with Kindness (ABWK)is a construction service of Habitat that focuses on minor
repair,painting,weather stripping and landscaping. It is part of a continuum of
construction services provided by Habitat affiliates using the Habitat Model. The Habitat
Model considers: Demonstrated need;Ability to Pay;and Willingness to Partner.
Specifically,the need is determined by an inspection of the property;the ability to pay is
determined by their income and the scope of the work to be done;and their willingness to
partner aka sweat equity,is still important component. Most ABWK projects are 1 or 2
days,so the number of hours required are adjusted. If the homeowner is unable to work
alongside the volunteers,other options may be available (e.g.,friends,relatives,classroom,
or non-construction activities.
We propose focusing this effort in Census Track 202 of Pasco, WA
ABWK will partner with current homeowners who are below 60%HUD median income
needing exterior repair work and light landscaping improvements. This program will serve
the elderly and disabled who can not otherwise afford this work being.done on their homes.
While we will use donated labor and materials,there will be projects where there will be a
cash outlay for product and staff co effort. Staff�oordinat on identify
ill be n needed to a
specific area to launch this revitalization
ident' the individuals served and coordinate the volunteer effort.
ABWK is needed because there are low-income homeowners who are unable to afford
exterior repair work thereby the nei hborhood ride deteriorates.
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics,demographics or other factual
information.
0 people living in Census tract 202 are low to moderate income
4229 people of the 564 =
75%
5
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) — what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill? outcome # 3
Goal # 1V__
Strategy # =_ Objective # ?
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box) D. No Priority ❑
A. High Priority X B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ❑
g
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: ABWK results in visual physical improvements
supporting neighborhood preservation and
revitalization.
These activities are aimed at improving the neighborhood, helping to make homes more
livable and viable by providing benefit to persons a d services es thatlsusstain the l manating
slums or blighted area through multiple activities and service
nei hborhood.
This project is in a geographically targeted ar frosubstandard to revitalization,
standard conditions ,
current owner occupied units to Ell ii a home
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, )
a. ❑ You receive income data verification from each participant in the program data
b. X Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census
Census Tract # 202
Block Groups #
C, ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Homeless persons [] Severely disabled adults
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
F1 illiterate persons ❑ Abused children
Migrant farm workers
❑ Battered spouses
d, ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area. unduplicated
7. Provide program benchmarks homes ass seed, how many jobs crea an ted or retained. Do not inflate
persons will be served, how many
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
" Homcbuyer - Unit of measure is households
`Public scrvice/Housing - Unit of measure is people • Economic Devclopment - Unit of measure is FfEjobs and I or businesses
" Rehabilitation - Unit of measure is houses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
$6,000
Is Quarter 2 Houses
$3,000
$3,000 61000
2° Quarter 2
Houses 61000
Houses
2 $3,000
3 Quarter 61000
Houses $3,000
4` Quarter 2 $245000
TOTAL 8
g . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
6
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
...........
following criteria:
6
FNumberof below 30% median income 2
below 50% median income
below 80% median income 3
Number of elderly clients 3
Number of minority clients 2
Number of disabled clients 8
Total Pasco residents served
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009
2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
None
Richland
None
None
Pasco
our project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
10. What impact will y p j
affordable housing;
An ABWK program will: Increase the number of families living in safe, decent, the base of
Increase the number of volunteer opportunities forcurrent volunteers;e business sponsors with dditional
volunteers by providing a different type g g
opportunities for smaller projects; Create opportunities to develop n CO city/county
ative relationships governments local
the community (neighborhood churches, comet ty g
businesses, schools, etc )
We will measure success by tracking community engagement, completed projects, and families
served.
The following are the magnum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded
2010.
rams (80% is the
11. g
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning
Vv� w �F
rvS people
1 Person 2 People M3 People 4 People 5 People 6 22 550 $24,100 $25,650
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $
50% $22,700 $251900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
80� $362300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68, 0
Median $45,400 $51,800 $58,300 $64,800 $70,000 $75,200 $80,400 $85,55000
12. Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget sted r this
expenses project.List any other sources ofBfund ou will
are requesting will be applied toward th
use to match with the CBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
D
requested and all other source funds. IN
E ense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
xp
7
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL: $2,400 Donations Individuals
Salaries Corporate/Church
OPERATIONS: N/A N/A N/A
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
$21,600 GIK Valspar Paints
Materials
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY: N/A
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
(Describe)
TOTAL $24,000 $5,000 $29,000
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
Valspar Paints is a secured national sponsor for A Brush With Kindness
Other GIK support is coming from Towing Companies to remove unwanted vehicles, First Aid
support from a local hospital as needed; and incentive gift certificates for neighborhood youth
involvement.
The Habitat board has approved $5,000 as seed dollars to support the launch.
14. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
We will scale back the amount of projects we could support. However, through leveraging
community engagement, our ultimate vision is to revitalize entire declining neighborhoods
and regain a sense of pride in homeownership.
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc. , what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
We hope that by launching this project and people seeing the results, that more corporate,
church, and volunteer engagement will want to be involved and thereby creating sustainable
support.
This proposal is to ask for seed money to gain a foothold and then increase
sustainability by setting up a payment schedule with the recipients. Factors to be
considered are lowering qualifying AMI. The repayment would be at 0% interest for
the work done on the home and a schedule that would not be greater than 10% of their
monthly income. The income received would then go into an account to fund future
ABWK projects"
8
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the sub recipient new to the CDBG program? X ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the sub recipient? X ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ❑ ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ❑ ❑
3. Does the sub recipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ X
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑ X
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑ X
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? X
a. Do you own the property? ❑ X
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? X ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities X
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is
attached, understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance
with these requirements are conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without
penalty and are not obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible
Proposal packets will be returned to the applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or
any pre-award costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and Uwe claim no proprietary
right to the ideas, writings, items or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
Theresa Richardson, Executive Director May 25, 2009
Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name &r Title Date
9
1 ,
IMP
(y e
N i
_ O
, If + _ in
o *�-. sip 1
A 's
a t
rA
r+
Q 1 ! Al
jis b Ss no°ESS 41 "
s ) t s
� rz�:y-S b F � W • � kts ��.. 777r777 4
0.
T ij ` rry i
sr�
�y
i
1 :.
1
2 0 O a O+ 0 40
aj
as a u 3 4 0
CL O 0 O
oQ °� pas 3 . F
a '
v CL
Sap° v � o
p SS a P Q 't - j► � -
ece cn `g
o
PL s r A ]
V p O. 4 O
A Ac 00. ; O O
0Am 3q
or 0
LL
M �
fQfa�' O4 � � A
4
qh
S H
3
0
O -
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
Community Development Block Grant Application - 2010 Program Year
Applicant City of Pasco-Community & Economic Development
Address Census tract 202
Project Name CHIP Minor Rehab Program (4 households)
Contact Person Angie Pitman
Telephone 509-543-5739 Fax 509-545-3499
Federal Tax ID Number
CDBG Funds Requested $ 20,000 Match $20,000
1. Describe your project and its proposed location, including what exactly the CDBG funds will be
used for, a description of the persons you will be serving and why the project is needed.
Provide 4 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable
cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards improvements (Census
Tract 202) ,
2. Describe the unmet need in the community using statistics, demographics or other factual
information.
3. Refer to the Community Priority Needs (Attachment B) - what Goal, Strategy, Objective and
Outcome does your project fulfill?
Goal # IV Strategy # IV. 2 Objective # Decent Outcome # Affordabil
Housing ity
4. Projects will also be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy (Attachment A)
(Check only one box)
A. High Priority ❑ B. Average Priority ❑ C. Low Priority ® D. No Priority ❑
Explain how your proposal satisfies that priority:
Cl - Bricks & Mortar Project resulting in preservation of affordable housing through
rehabilitation or acquisition/rehabilitation (engineering Esc architectural design and
inspection costs are allowed but limited to 15% of funded project cost.
5 . How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income
persons? (Check only one box - a, b, c, d)
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
LMH - 570. 208(a)(3)
a. ® You receive income data verification from each participant in the program
b. ❑ Your project/activity serves only a limited area which is proven by 2000 census data
Census Tract # 202 Block Groups #
C. ❑ Your project serves only the following clientele: (check only one box)
❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults
❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS/HIV
❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers
d. ❑ Your project will create jobs that employ low to moderate-income employees
6. Provide a map (separate page) showing the location of the project or service area.
7. Provide program benchmarks you hope to achieve in 2010. For example, how many unduplicated
persons will be served, how many homes assisted, how many jobs created or retained. Do not inflate
your estimates — the numbers provided will be used to assess your proposed project's success.
*Pubiic Service /Housing — Unit of measure is people * Homebuyer — Unit of measure is households
* Rehabilitation — Unit of mcasure is houses * Economic Development — Unit of measure is FiEjobs and/or businesses
Number Served Unit of Measure CDBG Cost Per Unit CDBG Total Cost
1" Quarter
2,d Quarter
3'd Quarter 1 Households 5000 5000
4` Quarter 3 15000 15000
TOTAL 4 20000 20000
8 . Of the total "number served" listed in the above table, please categorize your clientele by the
following criteria:
Number of clients below 30% median income 1
Number of clients below 50% median income 3
Number of clients below 80% median income
Number of elderly clients
Number of minority clients
Number of disabled clients
Total Pasco residents served 4
9. What is the amount of CDBG funds your agency has received in the past four years?
2009 2008 2007 2006
Kennewick
Richland
Pasco 0 37,500
10. What impact will your project have in the community? How will you measure your success?
Pasco CDBG Application Form 2010
The CDBG program will provide $20,000 to provide minor household repair or energy efficient
health and safety improvements for 4 very low income households for the purpose of making
housing affordable for these households.
Lower-income persons have access to decent, safe and sanitary affordable housing.
11. The following are the maximum income guidelines for 2009 CDBG funded programs (80% is the
maximum eligible). These guidelines will be updated at the beginning of 2010.
2009 HUD income Limit Guidelines for Kennewick - Pasco - Richland
1 Person 2 People 3 People 4 People 5 People 6 People 7 People 8 People
30% $13,600 15,550 $17,500 $19,450 $21,000 $22,550 $247100 $25,650
50% $22,700 $251900 $29,150 $32,400 $35,000 $37,600 $40,200 $42,750
ff% $36,300 $41,500 $46,650 $51,850 $56,000 $60,150 $64,300 $68,450
ian $45,400 $51,800 $581300 $64,800 $70,000 $751200 $80,400 $85,500
12 . Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project. Show where the CDBG funds you
are requesting will be applied toward the listed expenses. List any other sources of funds you will
use to match with the CDBG funds. Your total expenses should equal the amount of CDBG funds
requested and all other source funds.
Expense Requested CDBG Other Funds Source of Other TOTAL BUDGET
Funds Funds
PERSONNEL:
Salaries
OPERATIONS:
Rent/Lease
Utilities
Supplies
CONSTRUCTION:
Engineering
Materials 20,000 20,000
Labor/Contracts
PROPERTY:
Purchase Price
Closing Costs
OTHER:
(Describe)
TOTAL 201000 1 1 20,000
13. Are the above "other sources" of funds secured? Please describe:
Funds for HOME rehabilitation and CAC weatherization are secured.
This project will be combined with other housing programs for a comprehensive program that will
cover rehabilitation (HOME) , weatherization (CDBG), and minor household repair.
14 . If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, what will
you do?
There would be no funding available to serve LMI households with minor household repair needs.
Pasco CDBG Application Form [ 2010
15. If your request includes recurring costs such as staff time, supplies, etc. , what is your plan to secure
funds for these needs in the future? (The purpose of CDBG funds is not to fund projects that are the general
responsibility of government or to maintain the operation of a non-profit organization.)
16. Check "yes" or "no" for each of the following questions:
Assessment Question Yes No
1. Is the subrecipient new to the CDBG program? ❑
2. Is this a new activity for the subrecipient? ❑
a. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? ® ❑
b. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑
3. Does the subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑
4. Is staff responsible for the CDBG project new or inexperienced? ❑
5. Does your project displace or relocate any individual or business? ❑
6. Does your project involve construction / renovation? ® ❑
a. Do you own the property? ❑
b. Do you have experience with federal Davis-Bacon wage requirements? ® ❑
7. What type of CDBG activity is your project? (Choose one)
a. Public Service ❑
b. Economic Development ❑
c. Acquisition ❑
d. Public or community infrastructure / housing / facilities
Certifications and Assurances
I/we make the following certifications and assurances as a required element of the Proposal to which it is attached,
understanding that the truthfulness of the facts affirmed here and the continuing compliance with these requirements are
conditions precedent of the award or continuation of the related contract(s).
The City of Pasco reserves the right at its sole discretion to reject any or all proposals received without penalty and is not
obligated to enter into a contract of any applicant. Incomplete, late or ineligible Proposal packets will be returned to the
applicant without further consideration.
I understand that the City will not reimburse for any costs incurred in the preparation of this Proposal or any pre-award
costs. All Proposals will become the property of the City, and I/we claim no proprietary right to the ideas, writings, items
or samples.
SUBMITTED BY:
Signature of Authorized Agency Official Printed Name &t Title Date
MEMORANDUM
DATE, June 18 , 2009
TO : Planning Commission
FROM : Dave McDonald , City Planner
SUBJECT : Code Amendment PMC 25 . 58 I - 182 Corridor Overlay District
In the fall of 2001 the Planning Commission held several meetings to develop a code amendment
providing for development standards in the I- 182 Corridor west of Road 36 . The City Council
accepted the Planning Commission' s recommendations by adopting Ordinance # 3521 enacting
the 1- 182 Corridor Overlay District as Pasco Municipal Code 25 . 58 .
The purpose of PMC 25 . 58 was to create development provisions designed to enhance the
aesthetics of commercial development around and near the Road 68 and Road 100 Interchanges .
This chapter of the zoning code includes enhanced standards for landscaping and building design
and screening . Much of the development that now exists in the 1- 182 Corridor has occurred since
the adoption of the I- 182 standards in December of 2001 . While not being over bearing these
standards have been responsible for visual enhancements to commercial buildings and parking
lots on Road 68 , Burden Boulevard and the other commercial areas west of Road 36 .
The development of the garden centers at the Lowes and Wal-Mart buildings along with some of
the additional architectural features and landscaping on those projects, are examples of what the
code was designed to achieve .
The purpose statement of PMC 25 . 58 states that the Overlay District is to provide additional
development regulations to create aesthetically attractive buildings and commercial development
within the I- 182 Corridor of the city.
While PMC 25 . 58 provides development guidance for buildings and landscaping it does not
provide safe guards to protect the intended character of the I- 182 area with respect to ancillary
uses and activities . Uses such as special event sales in service station parking lots and itinerant
merchants in other parking lots can defeat the whole purpose for which the community established
the I- 182 standards . The haphazard display of goods in a parking lot from a vendor totally
unrelated to the purpose of building on the lot, is at odds with standards the community now
expects in our newly developing commercial areas .
Because the Planning Commission played an important role in the creation of the I- 182 Overlay
standards staff is seeking direction from the Commission related to ancillary commercial activities in
the 1- 182 area. If the Planning Commission shares the same concern as staff, ideas for possible code
amendments could be drafted for the Commissions ' consideration at future meetings .
1
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 18 , 2009
TO : Planning Commission
FROM : Dave McDonald , City Planner
SUBJECT : Columbia Bend Sub -Area Plan
In 2004, city staff and the Planning Commission were assisted by a consultant in a land use and
market study for the 1 ,000 acres of mostly undeveloped land located west of Broadmoor
Boulevard and north of Harris Road. The study advanced a number of development concepts for
this area and provided four detailed site development schemes for possible future development.
It was about the time the study was being completed that Central Pre-Mix applied for a
modification of their special permit to allow the operation of an asphalt plant. Activities
surrounding the asphalt plant application and the fact that property owners were concerned about
the land use section of the study being overly specific, stopped the forward movement of the study
and plan . Despite the fact property owners were invited to participate in the plan development
process, the high level of detail in the areas of street layout and land use were not supported.
Concepts in the plan were never formally adopted by the city.
Much of the growth experienced by the community has occurred west of Road 36 and as a result
there are only a few large undeveloped areas left to accommodate future growth. One of those
areas is the undeveloped properties west of Broadmoor Boulevard. This area has been referred to
as the Columbia Bend area in past Comprehensive Plans .
Staff has prepared a draft sub-area plan for the Columbia Bend area that is less detailed than the
2004 planning effort. The draft plan is more of a conceptual plan rather than a detailed plan and it
identifies development concepts and policy statements that can be used to guide future
development.
Staff is seeking feedback from the Planning Commission on the direction of the current planning
effort for the Columbia Bend area. Staff would like to begin the process of involving the property
owners in this planning effort . If the Planning Commission concurs with the general direction of
the plan, staff will meet with the property owners to refine plan concepts and then return to the
Planning Commission in late summer for further workshops and public hearings.
I