Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-19-2008 Planning Commission Meeting Packet PLANNING COMMISSION - AGENDA REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. June 19, 2008 I. CALL TO ORDER: II. ROLL CALL: Declaration of Quorum III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Dated May 15, 2008 IV. OLD BUSINESS: A. Special Permit Kids R Kids Da.. c�(Maria Aguilar) (1901 N 20th Ave) (MF # SP 08-002) B. Special Permit Farming in an R-S-1 Zone (DNR)(7500 Block of Argent) (MF # SP 08-001) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. CDBG Program 2009 Community Development Block Grant Program Development B. Preliminary Plat Sun View Estates, 21-Lots (All Pro-Contracting INC.) (3300 Block of Wernett Rd) MF#08-001 C. Special Permit Iglesia Apostolica De La Fe En Cristo Jesus (Franciso Barrera) (3212 Wernett Rd) (MF#08-003) D. Special Permit Iglesia Bautista El Calvario (Joe Franco) (216 N 11th Ave) (MF#08-004) E. Special Permit Kingspoint Christian School Master Plan (Georgia Perkins) (3309 Rd 100) (MF#08-005) F. Special Permit Franklin County Courthouse Parking Lot (Franklin County) (1016 N 4TH AVE) (MF#08-006) VI. WORKSHOP: VII. OTHER BUSINESS: VIII. ADJOURNMENT: REGULAR MEETING May 15, 2008 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Todd Samuel. POSITION MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT No. 1 Todd Samuel, Chairman No. 2 James Hay No. 3 Andy Anderson No. 4 David Little No. 5 Joe Cruz No. 6 Ray Rose No. 7 Tony Schouviller No. 8 Vacant No. 9 Vacant APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS: Chairman Samuel read a statement about the appearance of fairness for hearings on land use matters. Chairman Samuel asked if any Commission member had anything to declare. No declarations were made. Chairman Samuel then asked the audience if there were any objections based on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness questions regarding the items to be discussed this evening. There were no objections. Chairman Samuel asked the audience if there was an objection to either commissioner hearing the mater. There were no objections from the audience. ADMINISTERING THE OATH: Chairman Samuel explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or affirmation. Chairman Samuel swore in all those desiring to speak. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: -1- Commissioner Little moved, seconded by Commissioner Hays, that the minutes dated April 17, 2008 be approved as mailed. The Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: A. SPECIAL PERMIT FARMING IN A R-S-1 ZONE (DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES) (7500 BLOCK OF ARGENT) (MF #SP08-001) Chairman Samuel introduced the item and explained that it had been presented at the previous meeting and public comment had been received at that time. No further public comments will be taken during the deliberations. Chairman Samuel asked if there were any comments from staff. Staff explained that during the hearing, discussion centered on the use of the property for the storage of farm equipment, increases in nitrate levels due to irrigation and time frames for operation of the farm. Staff then reviewed the proposed list of conditions contained in the written report. Staff asked the Planning Commission if the proposed conditions addressed the issues discussed at the prior meeting. Chairman Samuel and the Planning Commission stated yes. Chairman Samuel stated the approval conditions addressed the questions on the farm. The Planning Commission received good input from citizens that live around the proposed farm and those comments were incorporated into the approval conditions. Commissioner Little moved seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the Planning Commission adopt the findings of fact and conclusions as contained in the May 15, 2008 staff report. The motion was unanimously approved. Commissioner Little moved based on the findings of fact as adopted seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the Department of Natural Resources for a farm in the 7500 block of West Argent with conditions as contained in the May 15, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved unanimously. Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the first regular meeting in June, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would cause a closed record hearing to be held before the City Council. -2- PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Special Permit Kids R Kids Daycare (Maria Aguilar) (1901 N 20th Ave) (MF#SPO8-002) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for a report. Staff stated that a notice of the hearing was published in the newspaper and mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the site. Staff explained from the owner/operator of the existing daycare that is located at 1901 N 20th Ave. wants to expand the facility into a vacant building on the site. The site contains a vacant office building at the corner of Pearl and 20th and a modular office building on the rear of the lot adjacent Richardson Park. The daycare has operated successfully on the site for several years. Staff further explained the property has access from Pearl and 20th Ave. Utilities are available to handle the proposed use. The existing daycare has not generated any complaints or problems from the neighbors. The site also benefit from the nearby Richardson. Staff stated they had concerns about the parking off of 20th. Staff recommended the entrance on 20th should be limited to employee access only. The pick up and drop off for children should be from the entrance off Pearl Street. Commissioner Anderson questioned staff if the parking lot extends completely around the office building. Staff stated there is a front and rear parking lot with a tree in between the two buildings and a playground area in between the two. A pathway/sidewalk joins the two parking lots. Commissioner Little asked if this application had been addressed a couple years ago for the same location location. Staff stated in the past a special permit was granted for the office building located in the rear of the property and last year there was a review for a special permit South of Sylvester on 20th for an existing daycare. Chairman Samuel mentioned he lived the fence on the Pearlside of the building was hit by a car once. He was concerned about the safety of the children playing on the site. Staff explained the playground was located on the North side of the building and the building protects the playground area from Pearl Street. -3- Chairman Samuel wanted verification that children would not be on the side or front of the building. Staff stated there was no room for a playground on the Pearl street side of the building. Commissioner Rose questioned the size of the playground. Staff stated it is a small playground that has been reviewed and approved by DSHS. The children are not all in the playground at one time. They are rotated during the day to accommodate DSHS requirements. Commissioner Little questioned the access from 20th is limited to traffic going north, allowing a right hand turn into the parking lot. Staff did confirm that would be the only real access the parking lot with the new traffic light and turn lane in the middle lane of the street is limited to traffic coming form the south. Commissioner Little questioned if you were going South, would you be able to cross the middle lane and turn into the parking lot. Staff explained with the left hand turn now on 20th it is very difficult to turn left into the parking lot. Chairman Samuel asked staff what the feeling with regards to limiting parking in the front of the building. Staff recommended it should be reserve for employee parking. Chairman Samuel questioned how they could achieve limiting the parking only for employees on 20th . Staff explained the special permit approval conditions could require it. Chairman Samuel asked how much more traffic the daycare would generate. Staff stated traffic could double. However Parents have different work schedules and the traffic would be staggered throughout the day. The applicant could address that issue in more detail. Chairman Samuel questioned if there would be signs indicating Employee only parking on 20th Street. Staff stated that could be a condition of the special permit approval. -4- With no further comment, Chairman Samuel opened the hearing to the public for comment. Erica Ramirez, 1931 N. 19th Ave, said she was a teacher at the daycare and explained their center was open from 5 am to 5:30 pm to accommodate the different schedules of their parents. The children are placed in different classrooms depending on the age group. They are very appreciative for the city placing a traffic light on that corner. She remembers before the light was installed there were many accidents, but not anymore. They have a waiting list for other children to enroll. Chairman Samuel asked how many children are currently enrolled and how many will be accommodated with the expansion. Erica Ramirez stated presently there are 19 children with 3 full time teachers and 1 part time teacher. She anticipates they will have 25-30 children when the second building is open. Chairman Samuel questioned how many children were on the waiting list. Erica Ramirez responded 12 children ages 1 year-5 years old. Chairman Samuel asked Erica if there would be a problem restricting the parking on 201h Ave. only to employees. Erica Ramirez responded that would not be a problem, they would follow the recommendations for the safety of the children. Dennis Houston, 1932 W. Pearl, was in favor of the daycare and stated the daycare is incredible and they keep the property maintained, they have control over their traffic. He simply can't say enough good things about the daycare operators. Mr. Huston lives across the street from the daycare. With no further public comments, Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing. Chairman Samuel recommended that only employees be allowed to park off 20th Ave. and that the drop off and pick up of children should be restricted to the parking area in the back. Commissioner Schouviller moved to close the hearing on the proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the June 19, 2008 meeting. Commissioner Anderson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Samuel explained for the applicant that the application would be voted on a next months meeting. Staff would provide a motion containing the -5- approval conditions discussed at this meeting. Final approval will come from the City Council. Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. With no further business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 8:05 pm. Respectfully submitted, David McDonald, Secretary -6- REGULAR MEETING May 15, 2008 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Todd Samuel. POSITION MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT No. 1 Todd Samuel, Chairman No. 2 James Hay No. 3 Andy Anderson No. 4 David Little No. 5 Joe Cruz No. 6 Ray Rose No. 7 Tony Schouviller No. 8 Vacant No. 9 Vacant APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS: Chairman Samuel read a statement about the appearance of fairness for hearings on land use matters. Chairman Samuel asked if any Commission member had anything to declare. No declarations were made. Chairman Samuel then asked the audience if there were any objections based on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness questions regarding the items to be discussed this evening. There were no objections. Chairman Samuel asked the audience if there was an objection to either commissioner hearing the mater. There were no objections from the audience. ADMINISTERING THE OATH: Chairman Samuel explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or affirmation. Chairman Samuel swore in all those desiring to speak. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: -1- Commissioner Little moved, seconded by Commissioner Hays, that the minutes dated April 17, 2008 be approved as mailed. The Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: A. SPECIAL PERMIT FARMING IN A R-S-1 ZONE (DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES) (7500 BLOCK OF ARGENT) (MF #SP08-001) Chairman Samuel introduced the item and explained that it had been presented at the previous meeting and public comment had been received at that time. No further public comments will be taken during the deliberations. Chairman Samuel asked if there were any comments from staff. Staff explained that during the hearing, discussion centered on the use of the property for the storage of farm equipment, increases in nitrate levels due to irrigation and time frames for operation of the farm. Staff then reviewed the proposed list of conditions contained in the written report. Staff asked the Planning Commission if the proposed conditions addressed the issues discussed at the prior meeting. Chairman Samuel and the Planning Commission stated yes. Chairman Samuel stated the approval conditions addressed the questions on the farm. The Planning Commission received good input from citizens that live around the proposed farm and those comments were incorporated into the approval conditions. Commissioner Little moved seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the Planning Commission adopt the findings of fact and conclusions as contained in the May 15, 2008 staff report. The motion was unanimously approved. Commissioner Little moved based on the findings of fact as adopted seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the Department of Natural Resources for a farm in the 7500 block of West Argent with conditions as contained in the May 15, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved unanimously. Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the first regular meeting in June, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would cause a closed record hearing to be held before the City Council. -2- PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Special Permit Kids R Kids Daycare (Maria Aguilar) (1901 N 20th Ave) (MF#SPO8-002) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for a report. Staff stated that a notice of the hearing was published in the newspaper and mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the site. Staff explained from the owner/operator of the existing daycare that is located at 1901 N 20th Ave. wants to expand the facility into a vacant building on the site. The site contains a vacant office building at the corner of Pearl and 20th and a modular office building on the rear of the lot adjacent Richardson Park. The daycare has operated successfully on the site for several years. Staff further explained the property has access from Pearl and 20th Ave. Utilities are available to handle the proposed use. The existing daycare has not generated any complaints or problems from the neighbors. The site also benefit from the nearby Richardson. Staff stated they had concerns about the parking off of 20th. Staff recommended the entrance on 20th should be limited to employee access only. The pick up and drop off for children should be from the entrance off Pearl Street. Commissioner Anderson questioned staff if the parking lot extends completely around the office building. Staff stated there is a front and rear parking lot with a tree in between the two buildings and a playground area in between the two. A pathway/sidewalk joins the two parking lots. Commissioner Little asked if this application had been addressed a couple years ago for the same location location. Staff stated in the past a special permit was granted for the office building located in the rear of the property and last year there was a review for a special permit South of Sylvester on 20th for an existing daycare. Chairman Samuel mentioned he lived the fence on the Pearlside of the building was hit by a car once. He was concerned about the safety of the children playing on the site. Staff explained the playground was located on the North side of the building and the building protects the playground area from Pearl Street. -3- Chairman Samuel wanted verification that children would not be on the side or front of the building. Staff stated there was no room for a playground on the Pearl street side of the building. Commissioner Rose questioned the size of the playground. Staff stated it is a small playground that has been reviewed and approved by DSHS. The children are not all in the playground at one time. They are rotated during the day to accommodate DSHS requirements. Commissioner Little questioned the access from 20th is limited to traffic going north, allowing a right hand turn into the parking lot. Staff did confirm that would be the only real access the parking lot with the new traffic light and turn lane in the middle lane of the street is limited to traffic coming form the south. Commissioner Little questioned if you were going South, would you be able to cross the middle lane and turn into the parking lot. Staff explained with the left hand turn now on 20th it is very difficult to turn left into the parking lot. Chairman Samuel asked staff what the feeling with regards to limiting parking in the front of the building. Staff recommended it should be reserve for employee parking. Chairman Samuel questioned how they could achieve limiting the parking only for employees on 20th . Staff explained the special permit approval conditions could require it. Chairman Samuel asked how much more traffic the daycare would generate. Staff stated traffic could double. However Parents have different work schedules and the traffic would be staggered throughout the day. The applicant could address that issue in more detail. Chairman Samuel questioned if there would be signs indicating Employee only parking on 20th Street. Staff stated that could be a condition of the special permit approval. -4- With no further comment, Chairman Samuel opened the hearing to the public for comment. Erica Ramirez, 1931 N. 19th Ave, said she was a teacher at the daycare and explained their center was open from 5 am to 5:30 pm to accommodate the different schedules of their parents. The children are placed in different classrooms depending on the age group. They are very appreciative for the city placing a traffic light on that corner. She remembers before the light was installed there were many accidents, but not anymore. They have a waiting list for other children to enroll. Chairman Samuel asked how many children are currently enrolled and how many will be accommodated with the expansion. Erica Ramirez stated presently there are 19 children with 3 full time teachers and 1 part time teacher. She anticipates they will have 25-30 children when the second building is open. Chairman Samuel questioned how many children were on the waiting list. Erica Ramirez responded 12 children ages 1 year-5 years old. Chairman Samuel asked Erica if there would be a problem restricting the parking on 201h Ave. only to employees. Erica Ramirez responded that would not be a problem, they would follow the recommendations for the safety of the children. Dennis Houston, 1932 W. Pearl, was in favor of the daycare and stated the daycare is incredible and they keep the property maintained, they have control over their traffic. He simply can't say enough good things about the daycare operators. Mr. Huston lives across the street from the daycare. With no further public comments, Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing. Chairman Samuel recommended that only employees be allowed to park off 20th Ave. and that the drop off and pick up of children should be restricted to the parking area in the back. Commissioner Schouviller moved to close the hearing on the proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the June 19, 2008 meeting. Commissioner Anderson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Chairman Samuel explained for the applicant that the application would be voted on a next months meeting. Staff would provide a motion containing the -5- approval conditions discussed at this meeting. Final approval will come from the City Council. Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. With no further business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 8:05 pm. Respectfully submitted, David McDonald, Secretary -6- REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-002 APPLICANT: Maria Aguilar HEARING DATE: 5/15/2008 1716 W. Marie St. ACTION DATE: 6/19/08 Pasco WA. 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Expansion of a Day Care at 1903 North 201h Avenue. 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: The south 25 feet of Lot 4, all of Lot 5, Block 1, Richardson Addition together with the adjacent vacated west half of the north/south alley. General Location: 1903 North 20th Avenue Property Size: 160 ft x 115 ft or 18,400 square feet 2. ACCESS: The site's principle access is from Pearl Street. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site. 3. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is currently zoned "O" (Office) and contains two office buildings. The properties to the south are zoned R-1 and contain single family dwellings. The property to the west is zoned "O" and contains an office building. Richardson Park to the east is zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and the house to the north is zoned "O". S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for commercial uses. The plan does not specifically address day care centers, but various elements of the plan encourage protection of the established residential character. Policies of the plan also encourage location of businesses in appropriate locations for their anticipated uses and provision of adequate off-street parking. Policies of the plan encourage the provision of services in close proximity to the residences they serve. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a determination of non-significance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. ANALISYS The site contains two office buildings and supporting parking facilities. The applicant is proposing to expand the daycare use from its current location in the office building adjacent to Richardson Park to the office building facing 20th Avenue. The buildings share a paved parking lot off Pearl Street. The applicant's proposal involves the expansion of a previously permitted day-care center to accommodate between 25-35 children. The site currently has a DSHS approved outdoor play area. The adjacent park may also be utilized from time to time for play activities. The site is located at the northeast corner of 20th and Pearl and as such has access from both streets. Although the proposal is not specifically considered as a commercial/office use, it does share some of the same characteristics. The traffic generated by the day care will not exceed that typically generated by uses permitted in the underlying office zone. Because the property has already been approved for daycare use there should not be a need for substantial changes in conditions for the expansion. Due to the traffic on 201h Avenue the Planning Commission may consider restricting the parking lot fronting 20th Avenue to employee parking only. Parents dropping off and picking up children should be encouraged to use the parking lot on Pearl Street. INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned "O" Office. 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for commercial uses. 3. Richardson Park is located directly to the east of the site. 4. The site is located at the corner of 20th Avenue and Pearl Street. 5. The site is in the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. 6. The building proposed for day care use is currently vacant. 7. There is an on site playground located between the two buildings. 8. Robert Frost Elementary School is located west of 20th Avenue. 9. Richardson Park is located directly to the east. 10. A portion of the site is currently being used for a day care. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT 2 Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusions based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Day-Care Centers are not specifically discussed in the Comprehensive Plan, but various elements of the plan encourage locating businesses in appropriate areas for their anticipated uses and providing adequate off street parking. The site is located at the intersection of a collector street and a major arterial. Policies of the plan encourage the provision of services in close proximity to the residences they serve. Residential neighborhoods are located both to the south and to the east of this site. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? A collector street as well as all municipal utilities serve the proposed site. The utilities serving the property are sized to serve utility demands of greater intensities than the proposed use. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The proposed use will not alter the existing character of the office complex or the surrounding park and residential neighborhood. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof This proposal involves expanding a previously permitted use within an existing single story office immediately adjacent to Richardson Park. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The "O" zoning permits several land uses which could be more objectionable than the proposed use. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? 3 The traffic and noise generated by this use will have a very low probability of creating a nuisance for surrounding properties. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the June 19, 2008 staff report. MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the Kids R Kids Day Care for the expansion of a day care into the vacant office at 1901 North 20th Avenue with conditions as contained in the June 19, 2007 staff report: Approval Conditions 1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; 2) The applicant shall maintain a current Department of Social and Health Service license at all times for the activities allowed on the site; 3) The number of children permitted on the site shall be determined by the strict application of the DSHS day care criteria and shall in no case exceed 35 children; 4) The applicant shall comply with all DSHS operational requirements for the day care; 5) The parking lot fronting 20th Avenue shall be used for employee parking only; 6) The parking lot off Pearl street shall be used for dropping off and picking up children; 7) Signage must be provided in English and Spanish explaining that the parking lot off 20th Avenue is for employee parking only and not for dropping off or picking up children; 8) The special permit shall be null and void if a modified business license has not been obtained by February 7, 2009 4 Item : Special Permit Daycare Center Vicinity Applicant: Marla Aguilar N Map 08-002 File # : SP SUM I C H �Rz'DtS 0 N S T - %I _ b Its M S ITE f MEARL ST W ah ■ W » J' CO ter N " r• ��1 r i .jOPAL-VST bL a' Land Item: Special Permit Daycare Center Use Applicant: Maria Aguilar N Map File #: SP 08-002 'Office SFRU's School Vacant RICHARDSON ST Park Multi-Family Eye Clinic SITE] PEARL ST w E Office > y Q u`�. '—SFRU's Li r- � o N N OPAL ST Zoning Item: Special Permit Daycare Center Applicant: Maria Aguilar N Map File #: SP 08-002 R-1 RICHARDSON ST R-1 R-3 "O" SITE, PEARL ST w w a a R-1 _-R-1 c~n R-3 "�•� � CD N N OPAL ST REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-001 APPLICANT: WA DNR HEARING DATE: April 17, 2008 Toby McKay ACTION DATE: May 15, 2008 713 Bowers RD Ellensburg, WA 98926 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Farming in an R-S-1 Zone (7500 Block of W. Argent) (DNR) (MF# SP 08-001) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: That portion of parcel 117-510-016 located in the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 16, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., in the City of Pasco laying south of the Franklin County Irrigation District Canal. General Location: 7500 Blk. of Argent Rd. Property Size: Approximately 30 acres. 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Argent Rd. 3. UTILITIES: City water is available to the site, and is located in the Argent right-of-way. Sewer service is located at the intersection of Road 72 and Argent. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject property is currently zoned RT (Residential Transition) and is bordered on the south and east by the City Boundary, on the west by lands zoned R-S-1, and on the north by lands zoned RT. The land to the west is the site of the New Pasco High School. The lands to the north and northwest are in agricultural use. The lands to the south and east are under Franklin County jurisdiction and are in residential use. S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for low density residential development. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a determination of nonsignificance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. ANALYSIS The applicant, the Department of Natural Resources, has submitted an application for a farming operation in an effort to perfect the remaining water rights on the parcel in question. Pasco has been an agricultural community from its inception. Considerable acreage devoted to farm fields can be found within the City limits and such has been the case for many years. Recognizing the importance of agricultural production to the community as a whole the City Council specifically established all farm fields within the City as of 1990 as lawfully established non-conforming uses. (Ordinance # 2780) In 1990 agricultural uses were also added as an unclassified uses in the zoning regulations and as such required review thorough the Special Permit process when they are within 1,000 feet of a dwelling or residential subdivision. In the early 1990's much of the I-182 corridor area was put into agricultural production with farming operations still occurring between recently developed subdivisions. These farms made productive use of the land and played an important role in preserving water rights for the community. As irrigation water was applied to the land water rights became perfected. When development occurs and farms are converted to land uses as indicated in the Comprehensive Plan the water rights are required to be transferred to the City. Following the necessary paperwork the water rights are then converted for community-wide use. The property has been used in the past, as reported in the School District Hearing on the adjacent farm, by dirt bikers, four wheelers and horseback riders. Although the property in question has been vacant for many years it currently has water rights available, however, the water rights have not been perfected. The applicant is endeavoring to put the land into agricultural production to preserve the water rights. The water rights can only be preserved if they are put to use through agricultural production or they will be forever lost. The property is identified in the Comprehensive Plan for low density residential uses and is currently zoned R-S-1 (Suburban Residential). Farming on the site can only be considered an interim use that can be easily converted to the intended use when conditions and development activities warrant full development. Recent growth in Pasco is a good example of how the conversion process takes place. Most of the 2 development in the I-182 corridor over the last ten years has occurred on lands that were formally developed with farms. In reviewing this proposal Staff has identified five (5) issues for consideration by the Planning Commission: 1) dust control; 2) noise; 3) general farming operations; 4) ground water concerns; and 5) the eventual conversion to a residential use. During the initial grading and leveling of the site fugitive dust could potentially impact adjacent lands if not properly monitored. This impact would be eliminated once a crop is established. Staff would suggest the applicant be required to maintain a viable water source on site during the initial grading and leveling so that during wind events the site can be managed to prevent dust from leaving the site. During other times of the year a cover crop can be utilized to control dust. Often commercial agricultural activities occur at odd hours with the use of heavy equipment and various chemicals. Development of an appropriate farm management plan such as the one required for the adjacent School District would help mitigate any adverse impacts on surrounding properties. During the hearing process for the adjacent School District Farm several neighbors voiced the concerns over ground water contamination from overwatering during the irrigation season. Again this concern can be addressed through implementing a farm management plan and specifying the type of crop to be grown. Even though the Municipal code makes provisions for commercial agriculture, the City's comprehensive plan has designated this area for low density residential development. Therefore farming on the site must be considered only an interim use. Placing a time limit or a reassessment date for the farming operation would address the concern of having the farming operation on the site for an extended period of time. It should also be mention that the School District prepared a Phase One Environmental Study and Burrowing Owl Study for the adjacent farm to the west. A portion of those studies include a survey buffer that covers the western portion of the site in question. INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this 3 listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The site is zoned R-S-1. 2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for future single family housing development. 3. The site is not designated as a critical area. 4. Commercial agriculture (farms) is listed as unclassified uses in the zoning regulations. 5. The site is in the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary. 6. The site contains 30 acres. 7. The site is vacant. 8. Testimony for the School district hearing indicated four wheelers, dirt bike riders, and horseback riders have used the site for many years for off-road recreation activities. 9. A large commercial farm is located directly north of the site. 10. The subject site is within 1000 ft of a residential zone. 11. The Pasco School District was granted a special permit for a farm on the property to the west. 12. The School District prepared a Burrowing Owl Report (BOSR) for the nearby property. 13. The BOSR indicated there were no burrowing owls or important fish and wildlife habitat on the adjacent school site. 14. The site in question is similar to the adjacent school site but contains far less shrub vegetation than the school site did. 15. The site is not list as a critical area in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 16. Much of the property was de-vegetated in the early 1990's in preparation for the development of a farm. 17. The site is adjacent Argent Road, a major street. 18. There are many small irrigated pastures located to the south of the site. 19. A farm management plan was establish for the School District farm to address concerns related to farm operations, dust, and ground water. 20. Developing a farm on the site will secure scarce water rights. 4 TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed site for low density residential development. The proposal is an interim use that will preserve the site for uses designated in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal also supports Policy LU-3-F that encourages the use of irrigation water in residential districts and Policy OF-3-B that calls for the continued expansion of the water system. The proposal will preserve water rights for the Pasco Community. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed farm will have no adverse impact on public infrastructure. A farm is not dependant upon City utilities or infrastructure as are residential and commercial development. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The proposed use will be in harmony with the large commercial farm to the north and is similar in nature to the many acres of irrigated pasture lands and hobby farms to the south. The location of other farms within the I-182 Corridor has demonstrated that farms within close proximity of dwellings can be operated harmoniously with intended uses. Farms have operated simultaneously with the development of Island Estates, Sunny Meadows, the Village of Pasco Heights, and in harmony with other residential developments in the I-182 Corridor. The proposed use will not make intensive use of the land or lead to the disorderly growth of the community. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? 5 There will be no structures erected with this proposal other than a pivot irrigation system. Development over the last 10 years within the I-182 Corridor attests to the fact that farming operations do not discourage the development of permitted uses or impair the value of nearby development. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Gardening and fruit growing are permitted uses in the R-S-1 district. Farming activities are occurring north of the site. The proposed use will not create more traffic, flashing lights, fumes, noise or vibrations than the traffic on Argent Road or activities at the High School. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposed farm will be compatible with the existing farm to the north and the pasture ground and hobby farms to the south. The proposed farm is only an interim use, and will not impede the development of future uses; nor will it become a nuisance to future permitted uses. The existence of numerous farming operations within the I-182 Corridor demonstrates that the proposed use will not become a nuisance to permitted uses nor will it endanger public health and safety. RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact and conclusions there from as contained in the May 15, 2008 staff report. MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of fact and conclusions there from the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the Department of Natural Resources for a farm in the 7500 block of West Argent with conditions as contained in the May 15, 2008 staff report: (Proposed) Approval Conditions 6 (1) The special permit is personal to the applicant; (2) The farm shall be operated by using best management practices for agricultural production; (3) No irrigation water is permitted to be sprayed or otherwise drain onto the adjoining right-of-way; (4) Irrigation water and farm chemicals must be applied at agronomic rates; (5) The farm crop shall be limited to alfalfa only; (6) No farm equipment is permitted to be stored on the site; (7) The property shall be posted to indicate no motorcycling or four wheeling is permitted; (8) The water rights preserved with this farming operation shall remain with the property for future needs within the City of Pasco; (9) The special permit shall be valid for a period of 3 years and will automatically extend to 5 years if the applicant adheres to the conditions of special permit approval. Extensions beyond the first five years may require additional review and the granting of a new special permit if deemed necessary by the City Council, provided no farming activity shall be permitted beyond June 1, 2018 unless a special permit is granted to do so. (10) The special permit shall be null and void if farming activity has not begun by June 30, 2009. 7 • Item: S pecial Permit Farmin in R-S- 1 one Vicinity • A pplicant: Dept. of Natural esources N Map File #. SP 08-001 sy......... ". 0Ito a VALLEY VIEW PL Q w.- - M1T ' 01 If SITE �: �-,;t_r_�- �; f O 0 0 00 0 0 .y Y. y �'° T m I 00 00 _ - - ARGENT RDA-_ tom` IL, IL ° ° _ Land Item: Special Permit Farming in R-S- I one Use Applicant: Dept. of Natural Resources N Map File #: SP 08-001 Farming City Limit SFDUs T U City Limit O va High School 0 SFDUs Under TE"r a_ _ C) Construction Q -1 0 00 Mixed City Limit 00 Comm. Res. E F I Low-Density SFDUs o � City Limit 0 101 1 a Zonin Item: S pecial Permit Farming in R-S- 1 one g Applicant: Dept. of Natural Resources N Map File #: SP 08-001 RT City Limit County RS-20 U City Limit 0 rn m RS-1 SITE RS-12 C-1 City Limit E I C�� County RS-20 w City Limit � fU ' ' 1 RECEIVED JUN 0 4 1000 Community & Economic Development Department COMMUNITY DEVEIOPMENTI7EPT.'� 2009 CDBG PROGRAM YEAR !1 PROJECT OVERVIEW 0001- / AGENCY: City of Pasco Community & Economic Development ADDRESS: 525 N. 3rd Avenue. Pasco, WA 99301 CONTACT PERSON: Angela Pitman E-MAIL: . pitmana(a)pasco-wa.gov PHONE: (509) 545-3441 FAX: (509) 545-3499 PROJECT TITLE: Program Administration PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 525 N. 3rd Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 110,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED (as related to the strategies attached): Provide funding to offset costs of administration of 2009 CDBG Program. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL (give a complete description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving): The CDBG program serves as a tool for community development targeting low to moderate households and individuals. The program requires administrative responsibilities on a full time basis. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN (SEE ATTACHED STRATEGIES) The City of Pasco has adopted a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s) listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need: GOAL# STRATEGY# OBJECTIVE# PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT STATEMENT: Description of meeting the need: 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority (A, B, C or D) that matches your project: Priority: ®A ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: December 31, 2009 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Provide funds for the administration of CDBG Program. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ® NO App 1 8. THE PROPOSED PROJECT BENEFITS LOW- TO MODERATE-INCOME PEOPLE BY MEETING THE CDBG GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR: (double-click box to activate check mark) (SELECT ONE) ❑ Public Acquisition of Property ❑ Public Facilities (new construction or capital improvements) ❑ Public Services ❑ Economic Development ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation ® Planning &Administration 9. HOW DOES YOUR PROPOSAL MEET THE NATIONAL OBJECTIVE OF BENEFITING LOW AND MODERATE- INCOME PERSONS? (SELECT ONLY ONE NUMBERED BOX -double-click box to activate check mark) 1)❑ You receive income data from each participant in the program 2)❑ Your project serves only a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area: ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)7 Your project serves only the following clientele ❑ Elderly persons ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers 4)❑ Your project will save or create jobs that employ low/moderate income employees 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition (Designed by the City as ) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES ONLY To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year began If you receive funding for 2009, how will your program be funded in the following year? NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance, a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service explain how your Proposal qualifies: 11. What amount of Block Grant funding has your agency or department received in the past three years? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 105,000 $ 117,000 $ 105,000 Richland $ $ $ Pasco $ $ $ 12. Provide a map (USE ADDITIONAL PAGE IF NEEDED) showing the location of the project or service area: App 2 PROG�ADMINISTRATIONACTIVITY CENSUS BLOCK %LOW/MODERATE TRACT GROUP INCOME PERSONS t 202 ALL 75.0 200 58.3 300 78.9 ARGENT 0 N co tr'S, n LEWIS Sr N r W -- A" ST .A. sr I i 4-1_ O V ACTIYITYLOCATION rrrnrr ACTIYITYBENEFITAREA CENSUS TRACT BOUNDARY 13. Project timeline- Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal 15 Quarter 03/31/2009 Adjusting entries and prior year IDIS Clean-up & close-out Create current year project in IDIS Perform environmental reviews Complete prior year CAPER Prepare amendments for carryover of any prior-year funding Perform desk monitoring reviews & assistance Complete annual Labor compliance Reports Input quarterly report data Citizen Participation for CAPER 2" Quarter 06/30/2009 Execute subrecipient agreements Issue notice to proceed Create current year activities in IDIS Perform site monitoring reviews Perform timeliness review Input quarterly report data Begin next year proposal process 3` Quarter 09/30/2009 Prepare draft Annual Action Plan for next year Perform desk monitoring reviews & assistance Complete semi-annual labor compliance reports Perform timeliness review Input quarterly report data _ Citizen Participation for Annual Action Plan 4 1h Quarter 12/31/2009 Perform site monitoring reviews Prepare preliminary IDIS reports for CAPER Input quarterly report data Verify performance measurement data &Annual report data Issue Annual Action Plan App 4 14. Budget- Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items (salaries, rent/supplies, office equipment, capital expenses, new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $ TOTAL BUDGET $ CDBG FUNDS $ OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER PERSONNEL: Salaries 60,000 60,000 Benefits 24,000 24,000 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) 26,000 26,000 TOTAL $110,000 $110,000 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request, how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned, will fewer persons be served, etc.? App 5 15. Project beneficiaries- List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ❑Person, or by ❑Household (family)? ❑Other(describe) Total Number to be served N/A Number of clients below 50% median Number of clients below 80% median Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of Pasco residents N/A (Should = total# above) On what do you base the above information? Following are the maximum income guidelines for 2008 CDBG-funded programs (80% is the maximum eligible). 2008 HUD INCOME LIMIT GUIDELINES FOR RICHLAND-PASCO-KENNEWICK, WA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 person People people people people people people people 30% $13,000 $14,850 $16,700 $18,550 $20,050 $21,550 $23,050 $24,500 50% $21,650 $24,750 $27,850 $30,950 $33,450 $35,900 $38,400 $40,850 80% $34,650 $39,600 $44,550 $49,500 $53,500 $57,450 $61,400 $65,350 MEDIAN $43,300 $49,500 $55,700 1 $61,900 $66,900 $71,800 $76,800 $81,700 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY - Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs that will be staffed by or made available to low/moderate income individuals. Number of new jobs created/retained Number of new jobs filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons App 6 17. Check "yes" or"no" for each of the following: SUB RECIPIENT MONITORING FORM # Assessment Question Yes No 1. Is the Subrecipient new to the CDBG Program? ❑ 2. Is this a new activity for the Subrecipient? ❑ 3. Has this activity been completed successfully in prior years? 19 ' 4. Does the Subrecipient have unresolved audit findings? ❑ 5. Subrecipient staff responsible for CDBG new or inexperienced? ® ❑ 6. Have all prior monitoring issues or findings been corrected? ❑ 7. Have CDBG performance goals been met in prior years? ® ❑ 8. What type of CDBG Activity? i Public Service ❑ Economic Development ❑ Acquisition ❑ Planning/infrastructure/facilities-Administration SUBMITTED BY: /Y L6 Signature of-Authorized Official Title Date App 7 Detailed Admin Budget 2009 Exhibit D Admin Services Fee 12,000 Annual Membership Fees 300 Central Stores Purchases 500 Courier& Delivery Services 200 County Services 50 FICA 3,575 Legal Advertising 200 Legal Reference Books 500 Life Insurance Premiums 75 Lodging-Meals-Mileage-Airfair 3,000 Med/Dent Insurance 11,600 Medicare 850 Misc Advertising 500 Misc Office/Operating Supplies 500 Misc Professional Services 2,125 Miscellaneous 500 Office Equipment 300 Overtime-Regular 2,000 PERS 4,150 Public Information Advertising 250 Repair& Maint- Office Equipment 500 Salaries & Wages Regular 62,425 Seminar/Training Registrations 1,500 State Industrial 275 Subscriptions 1,000 Telephone 1,000 Vision Insurance 125 TOTAL $110,000 Cj -1 JUN o 2 2ooa APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO C MO MUNf(Y UEVOPMEtR DEPT 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND - AGENCY: City of Pasco—Administrative and Community Services PROJECT TITLE: City Hall Activity Center ADDRESS: PO Box 293 Pasco WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 525 N.3`d Avenue, Pasco WA 99301 CONTACT PERSON: Stan Strebel,Administrative and Community Services Director E-MAIL: strebels @,pasco-wa.aov PHONE: (509)543-5757 FAX: (509)543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ $37,500 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: S 43,500 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): There are significant numbers of youth from low to moderate income families who are considered at-risk that benefit from participating in supervised recreation programs. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Salary for staff tooperate programs for at-risk youth. Clientele are low-moderate income minority youths. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) GOAL#5 STRATEGY#2 OBJECTIVE#2.1 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT STATEMENT: Proposed number of individuals to be served: 1,350 DESCRIPTION OF MEETING THE NEED: Will support Priority Public Service programs for children and youth in supervised recreational activites. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ❑A ®B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: January—December 2009 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Staff salary and benefits 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑ YES ❑ NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): City Hall Activity Center Page. ® Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program (LMH)(LMC) 2)0 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum& Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ®No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? Anticipate CDBG funding in 2010 NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ®Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service - 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 33,000 $ 35,000 $ 37,500 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ City Hall Activity Center pao wt3S1Ma iGTStf.U!tr t e -- r^Y' F ®�iRs;14 t H EL 1I . c- r lis f f W. Ti 4 fJ 1IFF t west,eetksst.-l��, � d' c %WAW9301 Z, 2 ti55 N 3tAvo Paso 110 s n ty, s \ pShDne r s Ae Na �.' ''�, , ,yeses ° ini�y, ,.i008 C gi;aIGlobo �'%-A�F1Ins . -0 tack�5;y. 'd ' O L�. + 1 9�f Polnlor. 46°14 O6 70'`N; t79.05:32c9&,,W...eleJ` 384 it Strxaiiifng 1 1111 1'.i-,.OD°!, t .�25, ;E.� alt,t)�3665'•(t 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an Jan. 1 —Dec.31,2009 Pasco City Hall after school program serves youth who are low to moderate income with a variety of meaningful team and individual activities such as rock wall climbing,basketball,soccer and board games. This program provides youth in the community an opportimity to gather in a place that is clean,safe and a positive place to be. 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 55,000 37,500 17,500 City Gen. Fund Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities 26,000 - 26,000 City Gen. Fund Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $ 81,000 $37,500 $43,500 Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ®Person,or by❑Household(family)? City Hall Activity Center p,,p Total Number to be served 298 Number of clients below 50% median 338 Number of clients below 80% median 60 Number of elderly clients -0- Number of minority clients 295 Number of Pasco residents 298 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Daily roster sheet 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: Administrative&Community Services Dir. ` Z Signature o orized Official Title Date City Hall Activity Center < RECENEr) 1. .1 JUN 0 2 2008 �ca�111wIV oEVe.o�rr oar. APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND _- AGENCY: City of Pasco-Administrative and Community Services PROJECT TITLE: Recreation Specialist Martin Luther King Center ADDRESS: PO Box 293,Pasco WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 205 S.Wehe CONTACT PERSON: Stan Strebel,Administrative and Community Services Director E-MAIL: strebelsnpasco-wa.gov PHONE: (59)543-5757 FAX: (509)543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ $37,500 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ 96,500 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): There are significant numbers of youth from low to moderate income families who are considered at risk that benefit from participation in supervised recreational programs. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Salary for staff to coordinate and operate recreation programs for youth and adults at the Martin Luther King Community Center. Clients are primarily from low-moderate income neighborhoods. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s) listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) GOAL#5 STRAGEGY#2 OBJECTIVE#2.1 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT STATEMENT: Proposed number of individuals to be served: DESCRIPTION OF MEETING THE NEED: Will support Priority Public Service programs for children and youth in supervised recreational activities. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A,- B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ❑A ®B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Pro am assists disadvantaged youth. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: January-December 2009 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Staff and salary benefits 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑YES ®NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals& Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): Rec.Specialist MLK Center prop i ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ® Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Plannine 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program (LMH)(LMC) 2)0 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑Severely disabled adults ❑Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum &Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ®No Year program began? If You receive fundine for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? Anticipate CDBG funding in 2010 NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ® Continuation of Services ❑ New Service ❑ Increase in Service 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 33,000 $ 35,000 $ 37,300 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Rec.Specialist NICK Center P-1 . . � • • � � • Cal- + 6 .. p'I- �Q+, :: rl-.,•L �'. �\ � .L'1 /III. �.. ". :`: .. t N y Y 6d •7 n�` • 2 1 4� 7.. 4id , I Div 205 Nr IJe Ave, Pasco,WA 99301 o `•'�� 1 > x/+�-��\lid t\ �.� - � I -.. �. �OW4y c �, tE. NA \L •+ `�a�lr'ti1' =s '. 'Pity _ ,1�1i :,... [I �� ,\ � L:. - �°I Eaj• J' � •- ��_� `tt - .:...c.�...'T""T'*' .Ed'S IkAlloniSllorli - - — E \ Inlayc 2008 D;yilalGlobe W� 2008 T�°,atla�OS�� -_=East H'e'0."Stieel j Fainla: -3Fi 59 5S' ,J 119-u43.i.32 W nlev '398 if- .'Stroeriifnp,llll�ll!�.100°0 ;d `. E/11:.I�IF 3679 ft 1 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an Jan. 1 —Dec.31,2009 Providing after school and non school day activities with the goal of building strong kids,strong families and a strong community through individual and team games, activities andspecial events. Supervisors stress four core value which are caring,honesty, respect and responsibility. 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 49,000 37,500 11,500 City Gen. Fund Benefits 17,000 - 17,000 City Gen. Fund OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities 34,000 - 34,000 City Gen. Fund Supplies 3,600 - 3,600 City Gen. Fund CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) M&O,Accting,Insurance 30,400 - 30,400 City Gen.Fund TOTAL $ 134,000 $ 37,500 $ 96,500 Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ®Person,or by❑Household(family)? Rec.Specialist MLK Center n. . Total Number to be served 3,500 Number of clients below 50% median 2,400 Number of clients below 80% median 1,050 Number of elderly clients 200 Number of minority clients 3,000 - Number of Pasco residents 3,500 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Program Registration 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: Administrative&Community Services Dir. Signature of u tfiorized Official Title Date Rec.Specialist MLK Center „___ RECEIVED. JUN 0 2 2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPi:+ APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND - UCO;2 — 4 _ AGENCY: City of Pasco—Administrative and Community Services PROJECT TITLE: Staff for Senior Center ADDRESS: PO Box 293 Pasco WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 1315 N. 7d',Pasco WA 99301 CONTACT PERSON: Stan Strebel,Administrative and Community Services Director E-MAIL: strebelso asco-wa.aov PHONE: (509)543-5757 FAX: (509)543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ $37,500 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ 200,000 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Provide the supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly with support services,nutrition, health and livin skills support. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Salary for staff to oversee and operate programs serving senior citizens. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) GOAL#5 STRATEGY#2 OBJECTIVE#2.1 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT STATEMENT: Number of senior service units to be provided: 40,000 DESCRIPTIONOF MEETING THE NEED: Will support Priority Public Service activities that will provide elderly Pasco residents with health and foot care services,nutrition assistance and recreational opportunities. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): _ Priority: ❑A ®B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Program assists seniors. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: January—December 2009 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Staff salary and benefits. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION?❑ YES ®NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): Staff for Senior Center Pane ® Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Plannine 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)0 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)® Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ® Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑Severely disabled adults ❑Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum & Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ®No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? Anticipate CDBG funding,in 2010 NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ®Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑Increase in Service - 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 27,500 $ 31,250 $ 29,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ Staff for Senior Center Pape To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? None. Staff for Senior Center pa,P z ' • • • • • 03 1 Kai Iff- ITt v f '�7r. i i ('. a-j .• `, v.all Ail�.� ,r i� •� � �' -i'.Lx ' r �&4��'4�� 41�:,}� - .� ^>+•ix'r ; ii / '�7p`-��:�i W g;itc7Str.cet� lb it it - � � .r i a„ ".Rte• _ f ` "� � .�� ,# t. �►�\Yom••,• i y � `s+�`.-'....�".:S•-r ..WeSdR'uliylStreetii!_ � � �.,-t` r ��' - "" _ West3Cou-rtI$treeti�' 3'15 N th AvQ, PascoyWA 99301 i f•s T« t • t ! _ ._.->_ _� `£._�....z".'..^"°"^.".^^•,WesPFlerir.y Stcriet'-� - .. .- j • r ,, �+-. r a __ -WesitMar arelt�trc�st-' - > -p}*�-- _ ---g- "`"" - -_.-• _ I , f . ' o aj PA St reef- .'L8"r"„'„tsi'It _-•.f.- +�.n - -' �, - � �a a ..,,.4 ,it >_� � •,' D�::- - � ifi.rat �2008[D,'AlGlobo , '• 1 r' 2009�TuIv,Alla r ,� 2 '.,. � �G�: . �'" °oir::vr :6't ."2_36' !J :i9`OS,'47=�W alry �t32:it •Streaming a 1 �- �Yxg� r A 1111111;198°A '•-'+'.'. = Eyo.6 ,':'3870 it Staff for Senior Center Paee 5 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an Jan.31 –Dec.31,2009 Facility for persons 50 and older who can congregate for socials,meetings, fitness, Health care, foot care,meals,educational presentations,arts and crafts,plus a _ Number of other leisure activities. 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF O PERSONNEL: —OTHER FUNDS Salaries 98,000 37,000 60,500 City Gen.Fund Benefits 34,000 - 34,000 City Gen. Fund OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities 35,000 - 35,000 City Gen.Fund Supplies 12,000 - 12,000 City Gen. Fund CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) _ M&O,Acctg,Insurance 59,000 59,000 City Gen. Fund TOTAL $238,000 $ 37,500 $ 200,500 Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ®Person,or by❑Household(family)? Staff for Senior Center Page.6 Total Number to be served 32,000 Number of clients below 50% median 8,000 Number of clients below 80% median 19,000 Number of elderly clients 28,000 Number of minority clients 7,500 Number of Pasco residents 32,000 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Program registration 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: \ Administrative&Community Services Dir. Signature of Aidthorized Official Title Date Staff for Senior Center POOP'r jex � 0. APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO 1y O? 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUNI �Iy� AGENCY: Pasco Downtown Development Association p PROJECT TITLE: Pasco Specialty Kitchen ADDRESS: 1 10 S.4'b Ave. Pasco, Washington 993.01 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Same CONTACT PERSON: Victoria Silvernail E-MAIL: pascokitchen @gwestoffice.net PHONE: 509-545-1172 FAX: 509-545-1174 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 65,000.00 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ 34,000.00 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): For numerous years the Pasco Downtown Development Association has worked with the City of Pasco to create programs that will assist the revitalization of the downtown community.In 2002 both groups partnered on the development of an incubator commercial kitchen to create specialty food businesses:that is now the Pasco Specialty Kitchen.This project replaced two blighted properties and brought the possibility of new jobs and business ventures to the low-moderate income population in reaching the American dream of business ownership.Additionally,the Kitchen serves as the base for Pasco High School Commercial Food Academy that provides educational training related to the food industry and entrepreneurship.Our Pasco High School has 62%of their students are low-moderate income. We have graduates from the Academy working for clients at this time.Our clients sign an agreement to consider LMI persons for their created positions. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: The Pasco Specialty Kitchen is an incubator commercial kitchen developed by the City of Pasco.The kitchen is approved by the Washington Health Department and the Department of Agriculture for food preparation and food processing.We have an Organic certified Client.Our clients include many types of incubator start-up businesses. Products from our aericulture community are used.Positions that are created and made possible because of the kitchen are: Managers,Sales,Craft Workers.Laborers,Service,Office and Clerical to name Oust a few. We have three preparation areas.Therefore more than one person(i.e.company)uses the kitchen at a time.We have gas stovetops and ovens,steam kettle,holding ovens,3 sizes mixers food processor,4 convection ovens,meat cutter, refrigerators,freezers and storage spaces for clients to use.The kitchen is available 24hours a day 7days a week so the client s are able to use it when they need it. Durine the start-up stages of their business they can save a considerable amount of costs for capital improvements and equipment by usine the Pasco Specialty Kitchen.The Port of Pasco is plannine individual incubator spaces and the sight near downtown Pasco we hope our clients that out grow our kitchen will consider these sights for their next step and encourage our clients to stay in Pasco. We offer assistance to them regarding licensing,insurance,labeling,permits and trainine locations if they need special permits.We have local resources to help them with a business and marketine plan.We also help them understand their position in the market.Contacts so our clients can get their 1)roducts in retail markets.local and our Northwest areas. In addition to our reettlar clients we vrovide space for two classes of high school students learning about the food 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page 1 processing business and how to create a specialty food business.Thev learn to create products,food cost, packaging and marketing.Our students at Pasco High are 62% low to moderate income.This program a bases for future small businesses in an area that opens the prospect of future low to moderate jobs when these businesses grow.this is a great opportunity for our students that can't afford college but can have the chance for a rewarding future.One of the largest labor need of business today is in the food processing field,so this opportunitv is excellent especially for low to moderate income individuals as thev can make a very nice living for the food processing industry. This funding is critical for the growth of our small business clients and the continued operation of the kitchen as it dose not make enough money from the clients to pav all the expenses,Salaries,taxes, marketing,supplies and materials. Your consideration is very much appreciated and would keep our valuable asset in operation for the City of Pasco and our local area. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) By providing an affordable commercial incubator kitchen a food business facility and assistance related to business development, marketing,and training.The Kitchen (located in downtown Pasco)meets the following, Action Plan goals: Goal 1.Strategy#1 Support business that create permanent jobs for low-moderate income residents Objective 1.1 Provide assistance to exiting,or new micro-enterprise and other businesses to hire or retain low-income workers and or low-income business owners. Goal 1.Strategy#4 Support activities that improve the quality of local workforce and prepare lower income and special needs workers to access living wage iobs. Objective 4.1 Support training and work-skills programs/projects that prepare lower income workers to be gainfully employed in local industries and businesses. Goal 1.Strategy#5 Support facilities,infrastructure or other eligible improvements to assist businesses that need economic development assistance by virtue of their qualifying physical environment economic or demographic conditions; to create living wage iobs and/or economic opportunities. Obiective 5.1 Support a range of eligible special economic development activities to address development needs in the following targeted re-development strategy areas: PASCO DOWNTOWN AREA. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority (A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority:V"NA ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority;Our Proposal satisfies Priority A. as an economic development project resulting in the creation of jobs through an affordable rental facility business development,educational training and work skill location in downtown Pasco. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Ongoing 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Funds will be used to offset personnel, operational and other expenses related to the managing the commercial kitchen incubator in order to keep the user fees at an affordable rate for our small business clients. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(x): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): �. Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic page 2 ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) I)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program (LMH)(LMC) 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑Census Tract 4 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑Other: 41�4 Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area (Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum & Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES !' Is this the first year for the program? ❑ ❑ /7 Yes No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service. If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑ New Service ❑ Increase in Service 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 65,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? None at this time but I`m researching other o )tions 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page 3 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: INSERT MAP HERE A: 110 S 4th Ave, Pasco,WA 99301-5507 MAPQ%JE SY W Henry St ¢' ptias9� 01 00 ft co Z r d. Sylvester a 9 Park a E: St - 2 a t Si Wh��tlont' gp��oe�dle S� Yd ��w1s St R St s "p y 5t- w N I- 9 9 0 P`fi l ew V t�,° v fl f v CoLumliia`'� u, � � h CO G R W A St 9 K it V!B St c` { ti E B l Q km rN. •'• Merger O� E C St Parr � `ti w 2C08 h":apCuest lac. y. ,L Map Data 2008NAVXpQ or TPIPAtias JOB L MAP CURRENT BUILDING PREVIOUS BUILDINGS CONVERTED TO THE PASCO SPECIALTY KITCHEN 2uuY wow Appuutuwu-ctmuuuw. 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if an March 2009 5 full time 6 art-time June 2009 5 full time 8 art-time September 2009 5 full time 8 art-time December 2009 5 full time 6 art-time 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 30,000.00 30,000.00 0 Benefits 4,500.00 4,500.00 0 OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities 16,994.87 16,994.87 Supplies 12,533.57 10,000.00 2,533.57 CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts 11,000.00 11,000.00 0 PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) 23,971.56 91500.00 14,471.56 TOTAL $99,000.00 $65,000.00 $34,000.00 Additional explanation of the above budget: Other Expense includes advertising(Pasco Chamber the Ag Show and the Hispanic Chamber Latino Expo)these Shows and Expos help bring the awareness of our facility to the public. The other expenses relate to the operation of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen. I If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? Marketing, packaging, labels and advertising are very expensive Our main objective is to keep the cost for our start- up companies affordable and give them room to grow at a pace to insure success.Without the subsidy our clients could never afford the entire 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page 5 cost of managing our incubator kitchen.We here in Pasco have one of the very few successful incubator kitchen in the United States.The successful kitchens have subsidies come from the Cities or Ports of their community.The State of Washington has very strict regulations for food related businesses they must use a certified commercial kitchen to prepare and package their product.Without any subsidy the Kitchen would likely cease to operate or need to revisit its budgetary commitments. 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by:❑Person,or by❑Household(family)? Total Number to be served 36 Number of clients below 50% median 18 Number of clients below 80%median 18 Number of elderly clients 6 Number of minority clients 10 Number of Pasco residents 12 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? 2008/tenant figures,Signed contracts,recent survey conducted to update our LMI information for clients using the faculty of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be Current Clients retained 36 12 Full Time(FTE) created/retained 53 if Pasco High Commercial Academy is added Number of new jobs expected to be filled 100%to date added positions have We expect the same results our or offered to low-or moderate-income been LMI and have been Students Clients sign a commitment persons(Must be at least 51%) of our Pasco Commercial Foods Agreement to consider hiring LMI Academy first. Position Titles Expected to be Created Owner/Mgn,Labors,Service, this program year Sales,Office&Clerical SUBMITTED BY: �S�Ve, c ign ure of Authorbdd Official Title Date 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page 6 1:36 PM Pasco Specialty Kitchen 06/02/08 Profit & Loss Forecast vs. Actual Accrual Basis January through December 2008 Jan-Dec 08 Forecast $Over Forecast %of Forecast Ordinary Income/Expense Income 4000A-Retail Sales 4.02 1,000.00 -995.98 0.4% 4000B-Equipment Rentals 4,023.00 9,000.00 -4,977.00 44.7% 4000C-Facility Rental Fees 11,160.00 34,300.00 -23,140.00 32.5% 4000D-Prof Service Agreement 12,500.01 50,000.00 -37,499.99 25.0% 4000E-Donations 50.00 100.00 -50.00 50.0% 4000M-Miscellaneous Income 0.00 100.00 -100.00 0.0% Total Income 27,737.03 94,500.00 -66,762.97 29.4% Gross Profit 27,737.03 94,500.00 -66,762.97 29.4% Expense 5037P-Administration/EDC 3,000.00 12,000.00 -9,000.00 25.0% 6010-PSK Insurance Liability Insurance 70.00 6010-PSK Insurance-Other 0.00 200.00 -200.00 0.0% Total 6010-PSK Insurance 70.00 200.00 -130.00 35.0% 6050 PSK Operating Expense 1,599.15 6070A-PSK Advertising/Marketi 1,568.26 2,500.00 -931.74 62.7% 6070B-PSK Computer 99.99 1,000.00 -900.01 10.0% 6070C-PSK Office Supplies 653.91 1,300.00 -646.09 50.3% 6070D-PSK Janitorial Supplies 1,169.95 1,500.00 -330.05 78.0% 6090A-PSK Garbage 582.95 1,500.00 -917.05 38.9% 6090B-PSK Gas 2,685.55 3,500.00 -814.45 76.7% 6090C-PSK Electric 2,015.15 8,000.00 -5,984.85 25.2% 6090D-PSK Water 551.85 1,200.00 -648.15 46.0% 609OR- Operating Exp Reserve 0.00 500.00 -500.00 0.0% 6090S Dues and Subscriptions 8.10 100.00 -91.90 8.1% 6095-PSK Postage&Frieght 91.20 200.00 -108.80 45.6% 70001-PSK Accounting/Legal 0.00 300.00 -300.00 0.0% 7000J-PSK ContractLbrJanitor 2,544.90 6,000.00 -3,45510 42.4% 7050A-PSK Building Repairs 0.00 1,300.00 -1,300.00 0.0% 705OB-PSK Equipt Repair/Service 616.40 2,500.00 -1,883.60 24.7% 7075P-PSK Telephone 540.79 1,200.00 -659.21 45.1% 70750-PSK Internet Services 100.00 500.00 -400.00 20.0% 7575C Cell Phone 46.70 800.00 -753.30 5.8% 7585 PSK Travel&Meals 600.30 2,200.00 -1,599.70 27.3% 7595 PSK Equipment 8,341.46 10,000.00 -1,658.54 83.4% Bank Service Charges -4.00 Payroll Expenses 11,250.00 36,500.00 -25,250.00 30.8% Payroll Tax Expense 1,150.08 Void 0.00 Total Expense 39,282.69 94,800.00 -55,517.31 41.4% Net Ordinary Income -11,545.66 -300.00 -11,245.66 3,848.6% Other Income/Expense Other Income Other Income 48.02 Total Other Income 48.02 Other Expense Other Expenses -238.27 Total Other Expense -238.27 Net Other Income 286.29 Net Income -11,269.37 -300.00 -10,959.37 3,753.1% Pagel 1:41 PM Pasco Specialty Kitchen 06/02/08 Profit & Loss Accrual Basis January through December 2007 Jan-Dec 07 Ordinary Income/Expense Income 4000A-Retail Sales 101.78 4000B-Equipment Rentals 8,520.43 4000C-Facility Rental Fees 28,508.88 4000D-Prof Service Agreement 51,250.00 4000E-Donations 400.75 4000M-Miscellaneous Income 20.00 Total Income 88,801.84 Gross Profit 88,801.84 Expense 5037P-Administration/EDC 12,000.00 6070A-PSK Advertising/Marketi 795.00 6070C-PSK Office Supplies 931.18 6070D-PSK Janitorial Supplies 1,512.42 6090A-PSK Garbage 1,282.49 60908-PSK Gas 3,883.97 6090C-PSK Electric 7,105.87 6090D-PSK Water 1,258.40 609OR- Operating Exp Reserve 666.10 6090S Dues and Subscriptions 25.00 6095-PSK Postage&Frieght 163.32 70001-PSK Accounting/Legal 270.00 7000J-PSK ContractLbr-Janitor 5,027.80 7050A-PSK Building Repairs 306.00 7050B-PSK Equipt Repair/Service 2,423.87 7075P-PSK Telephone 1,515.51 7075Q-PSK Internet Services 398.64 7585 PSK Travel&Meals 198.75 7595 PSK Equipment 436.08 Payroll Expenses 35,112.50 Payroll Tax Expense 3,054.95 Void 0.00 Total Expense 78,367.85 Net Ordinary Income 10,433.99 Other Income/Expense Other Income Interest Income 19.25 Total Other Income 19.25 Other Expense Other Expenses 145.00 Total Other Expense 145.00 Net Other Income -125.75 Net Income 10,308.24 Page 1 1:40 PM Pasco Specialty Kitchen 06/02/08 Profit & Loss Accrual Basis January through December 2006 Jan-Dec 06 Ordinary Income/Expense Income 4000A-Retail Sales 106.27 4000B-Equipment Rentals 8,310.74 4000C-Facility Rental Fees 30,320.70 4000D-Prof Service Agreement 65,000.00 4000E-Donations 475.00 4000M-Miscellaneous Income 100.00 Kitchen Cleanup Janitor Reimbur 0.00 Total Income 104,312.71 Gross Profit 104,312.71 Expense 5037P-Administration/EDC 12,000.00 6010-PSK Insurance 118.00 6070A-PSK Advertising/Marketi 13,054.48 6070C-PSK Office Supplies 1,246.68 6070D-PSK Janitorial Supplies 1,404.39 6090A-PSK Garbage 1,512.88 60908-PSK Gas 4,596.38 6090C-PSK Electric 8,800.57 6090D-PSK Water 1,448.00 609OR- Operating Exp Reserve 4,149.14 60905 Dues and Subscriptions 145.00 6095-PSK Postage&Frieght 196.64 7000J-PSK Contractl-br-Janitor 6,310.00 7050A-PSK Building Repairs 1,398.58 705OB-PSK Equipt Repair/Service 2,767.11 7075P-PSK Telephone 1,243.12 7075Q-PSK Internet Services 366.80 Miscellaneous 0.00 Payroll Expenses 30,000.00 Payroll Tax Expense 2,776.87 Void 0.00 Total Expense 93,534.64 Net Ordinary Income 10,778.07 Other Income/Expense Other Income Interest Income 17.01 Total Other Income 17.01 Net Other Income 17.01 Net Income 10,795.08 Pagel 1:40 PM Pasco Specialty Kitchen 06/02108 Profit & Loss Accrual Basis January through December 2005 Jan-Dec 05 Ordinary Income/Expense Income 4000A-Retail Sales 93.10 40008-Equipment Rentals 6,967.50 4000C-Facility Rental Fees 20,175.76 4000D-Prof Service Agreement 50,000.30 4000E-Donations 675.00 4000M-Miscellaneous Income 30.00 Key Deposit 0.00 Total Income 77,941.66 Gross Profit 77,941.66 Expense 5037P-Administration/EDC 6,640.00 6010-PSK Insurance 363.00 6070A-PSK Advertising/Marketi 2,868.47 6070C-PSK Office Supplies 1,524.05 6070D-PSK Janitorial Supplies 1,296.82 6090A-PSK Garbage 1,191.26 6090B-PSK Gas 4,228.27 6090C-PSK Electric 7,825.58 6090D-PSK Water 1,364.22 609OR- Operating Exp Reserve 692.11 6090S Dues and Subscriptions 1,250.00 6095-PSK Postage&Frieght 148.00 70001-PSK Accounting/Legal 211.18 7000J-PSK Contractl-br-Janitor 7,540.00 7050A-PSK Building Repairs 312.59 705OB-PSK Equipt Repair/Service 2,567.17 7075P-PSK Telephone 1,163.23 7075Q-PSK Internet Services 346.80 Licenses and Permits 145.00 Miscellaneous 0.00 Payroll Expenses 30,000.00 Payroll Tax Expense 3,040.68 Total Expense 74,718.43 Net Ordinary Income 3,223.23 Other Income/Expense Other Income Interest Income 14.28 Total Other Income 14.28 Other Expense Other Expenses 0.00 Total Other Expense 0.00 Net Other Income 14.28 Net Income 3,237.51 Pagel RECEIVED: �0� .. ' k MAY 3 0 2008 COMMUNITY mmopMEN1'p APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO = � 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND ow z' (D AGENCY: Pasco Downtown Development Association PROJECT TITLE: Downtown Facade Improvement ADDRESS: 720 W.Lewis St.,P.O.Box 842,Pasco,WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 4d'&Lewis Street Area in Pasco,WA CONTACT PERSON: Gloria Garcia E-MAIL: Pdda000mgmail.com PHONE: 509-545-0738 FAX: 509-545-8801 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 80,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ $27,000. 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Pasco's downtown commercial district serves an area of Pasco with primarily low-to-mod residents. The area contains old commercial buildings in need of rehabilitation. This rehabilitation is expected to increase business flow and improve area appearance. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: The facade improvement program will serve business and property owners located within the predefined boundaries on 4`h&Lewis Street in Pasco. It will provide funding for phvsical improvements to the facades of existing commercial buildings. The program provides 75% uo to a maximum of$20,000,and applicants contribute 25%or the remaining portion of proiect costs. Awards are foreivable grants that are forgiven over a seven year period. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) This proiect meets Goal I.Strategy2,Obiective 2.1 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section Q in Allocation Policy): Priority: ®A ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: It rehabilitates old commercial buildings in an area of Pasco that serves low-to-mod residents. The improvement may also increase business traffic. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: December 31,2009 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Provide up to$20,000 to businesses and Dropertv owner. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ®NO & ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 1 ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ® Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Plannine 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)® Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ®Census Tract# 202 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 2,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 2 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: INSERT MAP HERE \ j N ` 1 Legend' j?. :?, W '+ E .. _ —-_ _—�i �� - .. :..., .. Zone t Boundary 3 _ \ r._._I Zone 2 Boundary Downtown Pasco Business Improvement District January 2006 The yellow highlighted area indicates the area of 4t' & Lewis. 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 3 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an March2009 Solicit for projects March/April 2009 Review and award at least 4 projects April 2009 Bid proc ess May 2009 Start of Construction September 2009 Completion of all 4 projects 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials $107,000 80,000 $27,000 Participants Match Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $107,000 $80,000 $27,000 Additional explanation of the above budget: Participants match contingent on size of project,but must be at least Minimum of 25% If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? It is anticipated that 4 facades will be improved with$80,00,but if full request funding is not received then impact will be adjusted accordingly. 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ❑Person,or by F]Household(family)? 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 4 Total Number to be served 4-Businesses Number of clients below 50%median Number of clients below 80% median Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of Pasco residents 4-Businesses (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Census Tract Data&Application 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: Vice-President May 30,2009 Signature of Aut orized Official Title Date 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 5 1. .1 RECENED APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO JUN 0 2 2008 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. AGENCY: Catholic Family&Child Service PROJECT TITLE: Volunteer Chore Service ADDRESS: 2139 Van Giesen,Richland,WA 99354 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: City of Pasco CONTACT PERSON: Shari Hallman E-MAIL: shallma�tricities.org PHONE: (509)946-4645 FAX: (509)943-2068 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 4,000.00 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ $114,061.00 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): As people age they often develop difficulties maintaining their independence in their own homes. An issue as simple as an elder's inability to mow their own lawn can become an insurmountable barrier and could lead to eviction. Needs range from basic help with chores to wheel chair ramp building,allowing elders and those with a functional disability to remain self- sufficient. The clients we serve have issues with mobility,poverty,and isolation. There are also poverty issues that encompass high home repair costs,challenges with infestation,poorly maintained buildings,difficulty understanding zoning codes,and a lack of familiarity with local resources. Consequently,many struggle with maintenance and modifications to adapt their living areas to accommodate special needs. Volunteer Chore Service prevents elders'premature placement into institutions and serves people of all faiths and cultures. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give.a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Volunteer Chore Service(VCS)serves low income elders over 60 years of age and individuals with disabilities in the City of Pasco. These individuals with an income of no more than S 1,000 per month or$1,500 for a couple are in danger of being displaced or losing their independence due to obstacles that can be cost effectively overcome. VCS uses volunteers to serve eligible elders and displaced throughout the City of Pasco at various clients' homes. In general,the provided services include minor home repairs,wheelchair ramps,and roof replacements. Yard work,such as removal of weeds and trash to support code enforcements. There are 175 active volunteers ranging from 4-94 years old that are recruited,trained,dispatched,and monitored. VCS is singular in its ability to recruit previously untapped volunteers from all sectors of our community including businesses and contractors at the"area,"churches,schools,community groups like Rotary,Kiwanis and Juvenile Justice work crews. With Pasco CDBG funds,we will do wheel chair ramps ONLY to improve mobility for low-income seniors and the disabled. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal: Improve Community Infrastructure;Description of Meeting the Need: we help to provide self-sufficiency for our elders and functionally disabled. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ❑A ❑B ®C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: VCS projects specifically target preservation of housing and creation of wheelchair ramps or remodels to accommodate a new disability. 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page I 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: December 31,2009 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Supplies for wheelchair ramp construction, roofing and bath modifications 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑YES ®NO 8. ELIGIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ® Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑Census Tract# 3)® Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ® Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ® Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page 2 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Richland $ $ 4,640.00(returned) $ 5,000.00 Kennewick $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 0.00 To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? None 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page 3 raxc � uJ � Google Maps Goggle a _ �J�U �C��o •� x�'tx , i'XrF k .• TrT_diRra�_�eo� {gf ;�^f/>J•��'�_'��f__.jrl� r `��- �ifi;GlbE3 '` , �.`.� y" ++ �' �anoAr�Camer a �L�! 6`�b� �� ~•r Cn.rtF�➢ ��r .'Y.." � r { + ` %cf4rpoR f 395 Devils u rNEA F_ �:�-� ��-:fie y���-�� •.�..: �= �,� � _� Rd rl 7 sunWiUows 1' L' - - Jam_, ! _ • 'c C: con.cd�r�_ ' �x is I �• .� �. Vest�Pasco, , ,w= c �ul=Sllr?I-I,Z L: - ,� :t�•� —�� ` =—W.Catmt St Pasco_ est_�- U-K+x�s'rnan- _ -Nf Sykesta.St s 3 E L4 �WSyNedaat--- —s 2•^s r�7�G__�:''i' .i [,?a pP�art e!•-- , 52—E• •St --.i +'•"�: N.9S_. U'�I uc� ".W ig !Z Columbia —'Paas[$Y n-�?I]D:jl[!l I. .—'i �r`�• •. �'Cot.r�oia°art ' ?95 '�r. Corrpkx' ;-�iw! L -G l jL $8 „X,�r-.ms=E r - •vr temt��--if !/.:��''�= �`V i;, ,�' =�_=='j_ =r�-,^-� c •`'F.,. ! -�,; -..y �4i fir. ••�:,;\_i J _�'�,ti. '�r �_j �'iG k ! -�! �'-_:��-- � •cs __ is 4. - �_ 397 �r'ti' �;.�'..,1:�: --West .(-e. —i +�• .. •..�\ .1 1 __a :_ Pond! N,gNl ands A.2=i _=.,i ,% r�:•'�� ,_. E13 _ E Coder d". • ,i=� i J i.: � � ,CO+ntry Club i �:.•. – _Y"�%-si.gy "— .�=y.•. ,'•: .� !J( •yam r–•l:ra - ,i7—'--,_ _�`— - ' ]r_- —' w.7atn Av1! j��_ €Y!gOpRgle _ '�!':n7 NAV7EQ!L Xecros d http://maps.googl e.com/maps?ie=UT'F 8&11=46.234715,-119.104843&spn=0.037878,0.067... 6/12/2007 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if any) V Quarter: January 1- 3 Wheelchair ramps to improve mobility for low-income seniors and disabled March 31 2'd Quarter: April 1-June 30 4 Wheelchair ramps to improve mobility for low-income seniors and disabled 3 Quarter: July 1- 4 Wheelchair ramps to improve mobility for low-income seniors and disabled September 30 4 Quarter: October 1- 4 Wheelchair ramps to improve mobility for low-income seniors and disabled December 31 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: $57,179 State VCS Grant Salaries $53,579 $38,519 Donations Benefits $13,134 $8,363 Work study OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease $3,146 Utilities $1,048 Supplies $1,100 CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) $31,274 $5,000 Pasco CDBG $15,780 $6,000 Kennewick CDBG $4,000 Copes TOTAL $119,061 $15,000 $104,061 Additional explanation of the above budget: Postage$293; staff travel$2,400;Insurance$1,999; Volunteer travel $2,530; telephone$1,693; recruitment&recognition$1,086, Advertising$415,Misc agencv expense$20,858 If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? Specific assistance in the form of wheelchair ramps/roof construction will be limited without CDBG funds. 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page 5 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by:®Person,or by 011ousehold(family)? Total Number to be served 6 Number of clients below 50%median 6 Number of clients below 80%median 6 Number of elderly clients 4 Number of minority clients 2 Number of Pasco residents 6 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Estimated numbers of new clients served based on previous years 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: 1 ignature of Authorized ffi ial Title Date 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic Page 6 RECEIVED MAY 16 1008 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO _ 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) i WNI N DEMOPMENTIX r �XAX) AGENCY: Benton Franklin Community Action Committee(BFCAC) PROJECT TITLE: Energy Efficient Healthy House Program ADDRESS: 720 West Court Street—Pasco WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Multiple sites within the City of Pasco CONTACT PERSON: David Odom or Judith A.Gidley E-MAIL: dodonuir bfcac.org or.jgidleyw bfcac.org PHONE: 509-545-4042 FAX: 509-545-1449 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ $20,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ $20,000 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): BFCAC administers Energy Conservation programs,which serves low-income residence who are either elderly, disabled and/or families with young children living within the City of Pasco. These programs have limited funding for homes with combustion heating sources(oil,gas,propane,and wood). 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: This proposal's primary goal is to increase the energy efficiency of homes owned or rented by low-income households; to correct combustion related indoor air quality problems and to provide energy conservation education to the low- income consumer.The Washington State Department of Community,Trade and Economic Development(DCTED) sponsors the Energy Matchmakers Progam(EMP)authorized through Chapter 70.164 RCW. The EMP is designed to leverage matching funds,and a community can participate by providing a dollar for dollar match. We use an existing energy conservation program format of policies and specifications developed by BFCAC and DCTED. Households to be served would be the very low-income(50% of median). We have a list of eligible households who have already qualified and add to this list through referrals of new households from our Low-Income Energy Assistance Program. Although energy conservation programs have been operating for almost 20 years through local electric utilities, combustion heated housing has been ignored,even though they are usually the oldest, least efficient homes. By taking advantage of this opportunity for leverage funds,this program can help as many as ten households cost-effectively,and make available additional revenue to the local economy at a time when other resources are dwindling. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s) listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) GOAL.#IV,STRATEGY#2,OBJECTIVE #2.2—BFCAC will provide ten low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost,including health/safety codes and energy efficiency standards improvements. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section 11 in Allocation Policy): Priority: []A ❑B ®C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: It satisfies C.1 in preserving affordable housing by making them more durable,energy efficient and correcting health and safety problems. 131VAU 2009(1)[36 Application Nee I 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COM1iPLETION: 2nd Qtr two(2)homes completed, 3`d Qtr three(3)homes completed, 4'h Qtr five(5)homes completed; for a total of ten(10) homes completed for the year. 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: The funds would leverage State Energy Conservation funds,and along with CDBG funds BFCAC would be able to provide ten low-income homes with more durable,energy efficient homes and correct health and safety problems by installing insulation,furnace repair/tuneups or replacements,roofs,windows,insulated doors,indoor air quality systems, lead base paint clearance testing,client education for energy usage and lead base paint hazards. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUALBUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ® NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ® Housine rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)® You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)0 Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract # 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(L.NIJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Lowv-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey .area) L,NIC—Low-moderate income clientele L.NIH—Low-moderate income household/family LNIJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum& Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. Pt'BLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program.? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009, how will your program be funded in 2010? 131VA('2000(A)136 Application Page 2 NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service. If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑ New Service ❑ Increase in Service 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Richland $ 15,000 $ 11,000 $ 9,400 Kennewick $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? We are also applying for Richland and Kennewick CDBG Funds to provide the same type of services for their residents. 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: The whole city will be included in the service area,but it is anticipated that most or all the projects will be south of interstate 182 in the older sections of town. BFCAC 2009('1)13(i Application Page 3 13. PROJECT TINIELINE -Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if any 15`Quarter Identify first group of housing units for assessments, ER& LBP 2"d Quarter Prepare&submit qtrly report on progress 5 units) 3 Quarter Identify 2nd group of housing units for assessments, ER&LBP Prepare& submit qtrly report on progress 10 units) 4` Quarter Prepare&submit qtrly report/completion of projects 10units) Prepare&submit year end report 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHERFUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries $6,750.00 $750.00 $6,000.00 WA State Energy Matchmaker(EM) Benefits $2,050.00 $250.00 $1,800.00 WA State EM OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease $500.00 $500.00 WA State EM Utilities $200.00 $200.00 WA State EM Supplies $100.00 $50.00 $50.00 WA State EM CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts $30,400.00 $18,950.00 $ 11,450.00 WA State EM PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL S 40,000.00 $20.000.00 $20,000.00 Additional explanation of the above budget: Staff time in the CDBG is estimated to cover enviromental reviews and lead clearances which are a requirement of HUD Funds but not Energy Match maker funds. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted.? What portion of your project-will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? If only a portion of the request is received,then fewer homes will be completed. 15. PROJEC"I' BENEFICIARIES- List the client data of persons whom you ES'I'INIA'I'E you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ❑Person,or by®Household (family)? 131('AC 2009(1)[36 Application Page 4 Total Number to be served 10 households Number of clients below 50% median 10 households Number of clients below 80% median Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of Pasco residents 10 households (Should =total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Past accomplishments with this program. 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year :dumber of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: Executive Director igeature of Authorized Official Title Date 131 A •2009 c•ixiG Application rage r 1( RECENED . 1 [Pl 1, JUN 0 2 2008 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1>EpT 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND AGENCY: Tri County Partners Habitat for Humanity(aka)Habitat for Humanity Tri Cities PROJECT TITLE: Habitat for Humanity's Tierra Vida Project Support ADDRESS: 313 Wellsian Way,Richland WA 99352 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Tierra Vida Housing Development,Pasco WA CONTACT PERSON: Theresa Richardson,Executive Director E-MAIL: tchardson @habitat-tcp org PHONE: 509/943-5555 FAX: 509/943-1693 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ $32,184 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ $1,152,000 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): This proposal addresses the need to develop additional affordable housing opportunities to low income households in Pasco The work directly eliminates slum like living conditions and lifestyles by providing lower income households an opportunity for affordable home ownership while instilling values of hard work and accomplishment. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Habitat for Humanity builds affordable housing in partnership with hard working low and very low income families. Our household income range is between 20-50%of the area median income Through broad community support we work to provide simple decent,affordable homes This proposal seeks assistance for the water and sewer new residential connection fees At our current rate of construction,starting one house per month the water/sewer connection fees avera a$2,682 per household.We are seekin CDBG funds in the amount of$32,184 2 682x12homes 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) GOAL 11: Improve Community Infrastructure Strategv 1 Expand basic community infrastructure in lower-income neighborhoods while minimizing costs to households below 80% of area median income. Obiective 1.1 Provide assistance to lower-income households for water and sewer systems. Performance Measurement:Number of projects that improve the basic infrastructure in lower income neighborhoods. GOAL IV: Improve Affordable Housing Opportunities for Lower-Income Households Strategy 1 Add to the existing stock of affordable units by developing owner-occupied homes; Objective 1.1 Develop new units; Strategy 2• Improve the quality of affordable housing stock; Obiective 2.1 Support acquisitions of units for buyers and owners Performance Measurement:Number of new housine units affordable to and occupied by lower-income households. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section H in Allocation Policy): Priority:XA ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: High priority benefitinp,lower income persons by providing affordable housing opportunities for first time homeownership. Also addressing the national ob'ective to reduce Poverty and prevent future homelessness. _ Page l 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Land is currently available to purchase and the families are completing their sweat equity requirement. Our goal is to begin a new home every month. It usually takes 4-5 months to complete,using primarily volunteer labor. 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Water and Sewer Residential Connection Fees 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES X NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ® Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): Assistance for Water& Sewer ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)® You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑ Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)0 Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition (SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum& Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes X No Year program began? 1994 If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? We will continue to engage broad community support. NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service. If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: X Continuation of Services ❑ New Service ❑ Increase in Service CDBG 2009 Pasco Page 2 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? (NONE) 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ $ $ Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? No other a encies. rear?nog Pacr.n.doc Page 3 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: INSERT MAP HERE www.habitat-tcp.org Link - Map to Tierra Vida Worksite East end of"A" Street,Pasco WA 99352 Highway 12 East to "A" Street Exit. Follow signs to the Tierra Vida housing development. CDBG 2009 Pasco.doc Page 4 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an 1S Quarter March 2009-May Purchase Land; Secure Building Permits; Start Construction of 3 homes 2009 2"d Quarter June 2009- Continue construction activities on homes 1-3; Purchase land,secure building permits, -August 2009 start construction on homes 4-6 3rd Quarter Sept 2009-Dec Dedication of completed homes 1-3; Continue construction activities on homes 4-6; 2009 Purchase land,secure building ern-its,start construction on homes 7-9 4 1h Quarter Jan 2010-March Dedication of homes 4-6; Continue construction activities on homes 7-9; Purchase land, 2010 secure building permits,start construction homes 10-12 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries $180,000 $180,000 Donors Benefits (None) OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease $26,400 Utilities 1,200 Supplies 500 $28,100 CONSTRUCTION: Architectural (None) Engineering (None) Materials $672,000 $492,000 Yakima Federal/Communit y Donations Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price $276,000 $276,000 CTED Grant Closing cost 24,000 24,000 Home$tart Grant OTHER: (describe) Water/Sewer Connection 32.184 $32,184 Fees Other Fees 39,816 TOTAL $1,224,000 $32,184 $1,191,816 Additional explanation of the above budget: This budget reflects not only the Tierra Vida proiect in Pasco but also we have proiects in Richland and Kennewick CDBG 2009 Pasco.doc Page 5 concurrently. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? We will reschedule the production timeline We will slow up our construction pace and have to increase fundraising efforts in the community to make up for the short-fall. Fewer people will be served. 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ❑Person,or by X Household(family)? Total Number to be served 12 Number of clients below 50% median 12 Number of clients below 80% median 12 Number of elderly clients Unknown Number of minority clients 11 Number of Pasco residents 12 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Our application criteria serves families at the 25-50%median area income The majorityof qualifying families but not all seem to be of a minority status. 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: V_ Executive Director Mav 31,2008 Signature of Authorized Official Title Date CDBG 2009 Pasco.doc Page 6 RECEIVED 1- -1 JUN 0 2 2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND W05 - 10 AGENCY: Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton & Franklin Counties PROJECT TITLE: Program Space Expansion and Safety Enhancement ADDRESS: 801 N 18th Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: 801 N 181h Ave, Pasco, WA 99301 CONTACT PERSON: Ron McHenry E-MAIL: Ron@akidexpert.org PHONE: 509-543-9980 FAX: 509-543-9981 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 50,E AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ $5,000 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): The Boys & Girls Clubs Main Branch facility is located within an old elementary school building. This is an issue of safety and increased service. Average Daily Attendance has increased 40% since 2006. This has resulted in a situation where we have had to convert our stage into classroom for 5-year-olds. They are simply not emotionally and physically developed enough to be able to interact in a less structured environment with older kids. The lighting and electrical situation is such that the stage is dark and all the electrical wiring is almost 60 years-old, preventing regular program use in a safe environment. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: The services that the Boys &Girls Clubs of Benton and Franklin Counties offer are specifically related to the strategic priorities. The youth served in our program are predominantly from low-income households and would otherwise be unsupervised during program hours; 86.3% and 92.2% of the youth from the two schools closest to our building are receiving free or reduced lunches. These youth will be more safely served educationally and recreationally through this project. Goal III, Strategy 1 addresses the improvement of community or neighborhood centers. Additionally, the work of the Boys & Girls Club and this project will address Goal V, Strategy 2 by providing services to children and youth, homeless families, and lower-income families. We propose to renovate the stage and the lighting in the gym to replace 50 year-old equipment with modern lighting that will be less easily broken,provide a brighter and safer environment, be more energy efficient, and replace outdated electrical components with safer versions. We propose to replace the 50 year-old curtain with a new fire retardant curtain which will make the stage a safer location for providing services to kids every day. To provide increased services to kids we would like to install a ceiling mounted projector and screen which will open up a whole new realm of programming possibilities to the youth in our community. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal #3 Strategy# 1 2009 CDBG Application-Pasco.doc Page 1 Objective#1.1 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT STATEMENT:Success of the project will measured based on increasing programming for 5 year-old youth served in structured programming, a decrease in incidents of younger kids conflicting with older kids, and a decrease in behavioral concerns based on increased involvement and supervision. DESCRIPTION OF MEETING THE NEED: We are pleased about the possibilities this capital improvement project will give to our youth. By increasing safe program areas for kids and reducing the likelihood of lighting fixtures of breaking and falling on kids, we will be better able to safely serve youth at the Boys &Girls Club. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ®A ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: Improve public facility to ensure increased safety, security, and services to disadvantaged youth. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Bids will be solicited by June 15th, a contract signed by August I", Project will begin by September 1St, and be completed by October 151h. 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: CDBG funds will be used to purchase and install materials and electrical supplies. Demolition is minimal; just the taking down of old electrical structures. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑YES ®NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ® Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ® Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ IIousing rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons? (See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)0 You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)❑ Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑ Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers 2009 CDBG Application-Pasco.doe Page 2 ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creationlretention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑Increase in Service 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ $140,000 $ $100,000 $ $35,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $100,000 $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? Sharefest has already installed a removable barrier that makes the stage a safe location for kids so that they do not fall off the stage while they are playing up there. They also painted the entire gym and stage. 2009 CDBG Application-Pasco.doc Page 3 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: INSERT MAP HERE Court St. 39 2011'St. 18`I' St Bovs & Girls Club 0 Edgar Brown Sylvester 2009 CDBG Application-Pasco.doc Page 4 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an Date Milestone/Goal 1St Quarter No work will be completed during this time. 2° Quarter Contract will be signed with the City of Pasco and bids will be solicited from the community. 3r Quarter Contract will be signed with contractor and work will be started on the project. 4t' Quarter Project will be completed. 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials $35,000 $1,000 Sharefest Labor/Contracts $15,000 $4,000 PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $ $50,000 $5,000 Additional explanation of the above budget: Volunteer labor and material have already been provided by Sharefest If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? 2009 CDBG Application-Pasco.doc Page 5 Depending upon the amount of money received we would either reduce the quality of some of the material, if possible, or delay making the needed improvements. 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ®Person,or by ❑Household(family)? Total Number to be served 1000 Number of clients below 50%median 500 Number of clients below 80%median 800 Number of elderly clients Number of minority clients Number of Pasco residents 1000 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Agency client data tracking software 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: 1. A)5� 70jit- President May 30, 2008 Signature thorized Official Title Date 2009 CDBG Application-Pasco.doc Page 6 y. IRECEWD JUT. . .1 'JUN 0A 1008 CO IYDEVELOPMEWD EK APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO " '� 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND 1 AGENCY: City of Pasco—Administrative and Community Services/YMCA PROJECT TITLE: Martin Luther King Center Gym Remodel ADDRESS: 205 S. Wehe Pasco WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: South end of the gymnasium CONTACT PERSON: Stan Strebel,Administrative and Community Services E-MAIL: strebels@pasco-wa.eov PHONE: (509)543-5757 FAX: (509)543-5758 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ $100,000(anticipate$25,000 carry forward from 2007 CDBG) AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ -0- 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): There are 1,700 sq. ft. of unusable space in the gym wing at the Martin Luther King Center that can be reclaimed to allow for expanded programs serving families of low to moderate income with supervised recreation. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: The remodel will convert five small rooms to 3 more functional rooms. This new space in the gym will provide programmable space for recreation for citizens of low—moderate income who have been under-served because of restricted facilities. The program that will be expanded will utilize the YMCA character development model. The additional space will also allow for a greatly expanded computer lab/homework center and a multi-purpose classroom,all of which benefit both boys and girls and their families. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) This project will improve a public facility(Goal III)that serves low—moderate income households. It will support priority public services Goal V)that include supervised recreation of children and youth. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ®A ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: This project addresses national objectives and it is a bricks and mortar project. 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: May 2009—June 2009 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Construction contract 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ® NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals& Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): MLK Gym Remodel Page i ® Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(0)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housinz rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Planning 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program (LMH)(LMC) 2)® Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑ Downtown Revitalization Zone ❑ Census Tract# 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑Homeless persons ❑Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum &Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service. If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑ New Service ❑ Increase in Service 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco(MLK) $ 50,000 $ 40,000 $ Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? MLK Gym Remodel Page 2 205 S Wehe,Pasco WA 99301 - Google Maps Page 1 of 1 GO q .a j a d ±c E Broadway St � a � 2 ti 8 E Adele St z \,,kt. °7 N to ¢ E Alton St 0067�oogle-Imp©2006 D§ItalGlobe,flap ddla©2106 N4VTE f t""-Terms of Use http://maps.google.com/ 6/30/2006 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an 2008 Complete Design 2008 CDBG allocation) 2009 2" Quarter—Bid project 2009 3` Quarter—Complete project Occupy news aces Continue program expansion 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering $125,000 $100,000 $25,000 CDBG (2007) Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $ 125,000 $ 100,000 $ 25,000 Additional explanation of the above budget: Anticipate$25k in carryover over CDBG from 2007 allocation. If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ®Person,or by[]Household(family)? MLK Gym Remodel Page 4 Total Number to be served 4,800 Number of clients below 50% median 1,800 Number of clients below 80% median 4,000 Number of elderly clients 25 Number of minority clients 4,775 Number of Pasco residents 4,800 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Actual attendance figures compiled by the YMCA. 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: 6/4/08 Signature of rthqWzed Official Title Date MLK Gym Remodel Page 5 COPY APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO DECEIVED 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND �o 0_1 MAY 2 8 2008 City of Pasco-Department of Community & Economic Development Inspection Services AGENCY: Division V91 OPMEa OEM PROJECT TITLE: Provide Inspection Services In Low and Moderate Income Areas o asco ADDRESS: 525 North 3d Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301 PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: Central and East Pasco CONTACT PERSON: Mitch Nickolds, Inspection Services Manager E-MAIL: nickoldsm @ pasco-wa.gov PHONE: (509) 545-3441 FAX: 509-545-3499 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 48,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ 17,025 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Blight conditions, property nuisances and fire hazards in homes and upon properties owned and/or occupied by low to moderate income families and lack of education of minimum housing and property maintenance standards for low to moderate income households. Property and housing conditions in older neighborhoods will continue to decline without constant code enforcement and education efforts. 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: Pasco Code Enforcement Officers will conduct surveys and respond to property owner and occupant complaints to ensure compliance and education regarding housing and property nuisances for low to moderate income families. The funds will be used to pay a portion of the City's cost for one of three the code enforcement officers. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached—in particular Goal IV 2.2 Strategy 2. Sustain or improve the quality of existing affordable housing stock. Objective 2.1 Support acquisitions and/or rehabilitations of units for buyers, owners, or renters. Obiective 2.2 Support housing activities that provide assistance to units and properties to meet local codes, as well as fit to neighborhoods. Activities include eligible code enforcement tasks, improvements related to energy efficiency and other needs. Priority will be given to rehabilitation or new construction ro'ects in targeted neighborhoods/areas including removal of s of blight conditions. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ®A CB CC CD and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority:A.LC Neighborhood Preservation • Mitigation of blight conditions, property nuisances and fire hazards in homes and upon properties owned and/or occupied by low to moderate income families. • Education of low and moderate income residents regarding minimum housing and property maintenance requirements. Irmo rnRr.n Pa i 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: Jan. 1 — Dec. 31, 2009 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: PaVinq portion of the code enforcement officer salaries (21% of Total). 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ONO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ❑ Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housine rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ® Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Plannine 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)® Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ®Census Tract# 201.202,203, 204 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑Migrant farm workers ❑ At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ®No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? Ongoing CDBG support. NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ® Continuation of Services ❑ New Service ❑ Increase in Service ')AAQ r nnr.Annlirotin,i-Rl—t—ir P.—I 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 48,000 $ 48,000 $ 48,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? The City contributes 79% or$241, 385 per year to pay for additional code enforcement officers who help patrol the target census areas populated by persons 70.7% of whom are characterized as low to moderate income, in addition to other areas of the City. ,)nno rnRn n.,u*,.t;.,.,-Pi—t—.,;P P.—Z 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: MnQ rnRr.A—N—t;—-Pl—t—i Ponn d CODE ENFORCEMENT CENSUS BLOCK %LOW/MODERATE TRACT GROUP INCOME PERSONS 201 ALL 74.6 100 68.8 �. 200 69.7 1 300 90.5 500 8I 2 600 77.8 202 ALL 75.0 J- 100 86. 200 58.3 3 .. 300 78.9 -jo f ..i`} f✓`. _ w �f�' ;r� 203 ALL 62.8 100 76.9 203 300 Aso \� 400 46.0 � 204 ALL 69.8 ''f O 300 88 4 ,,. 400 78.0 Soo 56 4 X201 -�- rb 820 --fir � p . I co I N1Q 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal include numerical performance progress if an 3/31/09 Property nuisance conditions abated on 125 properties/homes 6/30/09 Property nuisance conditions abated on 125 properties/homes 9/30/09 Property nuisance conditions abated on 125 properties/homes 12/31/09 Property nuisance conditions abated on 125 properties/homes 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries 48,000 48,000 Benefits 17,025 17.025 LOCAL OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Architectural Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) TOTAL $65,025 $48,000 $17,025 Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? Nuisance conditions in census tract properties occupied by low-to-moderate income families will remain unabated and the neiehborhoods will continue to deteriorate and fewer person s will be served. '7Mo rnpr.O—G—t;—-Rl—t—.;, pons.A 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: ®Person,or by❑Household(family)? Total Number to be served 24,444 Number of clients below 50% median 7,034 Number of clients below 80% median 10,244 Number of elderly clients 1,998 Number of minority clients 16,731 Number of Pasco residents 24,444 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? 2000 Census 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be 0 0 created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled 0 0 or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created 0 0 this program year SUBMITTED BY: Y-J1 S f. S r 2 Q -09 S natu e o Au rized Official Title Date IWO MAr.Annlirofinn-Pl—f—nir P.—7 M100 APPLICATION FOR CITY OF PASCO 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG)FUND owls- 1-3 AGENCY: City of Pasco PROJECT TITLE: Curb,Gutter,Sidewalk and Roadway Improvements RECEIVED ADDRESS: 525 N 3`d Ave. PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION: City Wide JUN 0 2 2008 CONTACT PERSON: Robert Alberts E-MAIL: albertsbC'pasco-wa.gov COMMUNITY DEVE PHONE: 545-3444 FAX: 543-5728 AMOUNT OF CDBG FUNDS REQUESTED: $ 300,000 AMOUNT OF NON-CDBG MATCH: $ 0 1. DESCRIBE THE PROBLEM OR NEED(AS RELATED TO THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN ATTACHED): Portions of the proposed project location require improved access due to lack of existing infrastructure (Goal II. Improve Community Infrastructure) 2. EXPLANATION OF PROPOSAL-Give a complete detailed description of your proposal including a description of the clientele you will be serving: The project will install new curb,gutter,sidewalk,and roadways or repair and update the existing infrastructure throughout the proposed area. The existing infrastructure in this area is incomplete or non-existent. Clientele served by this project will be residents of the City of Pasco,residing within the proposed area and include:elderly,disabled, low-income, and children. 3. CONSOLIDATED PLAN: The City of Pasco is required to adopt a long-range community action plan to determine where the use of Block Grant funds should be focused. List the identified objective(s)listed in the City of Pasco Consolidated Plan that the proposal addresses and explain how your proposal meets that need. (See STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN GOALS attached) Goal II,Strategy 1,Objective 1.2 Assist eligible infrastructure activities that revitalize and stabilize older or declining neighborhoods or areas with a majority of lower-income persons. 4. ALLOCATION POLICY: Projects will be ranked according to the attached Allocation Policy. Identify the priority(A, B,C or D)that matches your project(see Section II in Allocation Policy): Priority: ®A ❑B ❑C ❑D and explain how your proposal satisfies that priority: 5. GENERAL SCHEDULE FOR PROJECT COMPLETION: This is a multi-year proiect. 6. SPECIFY EXACTLY WHAT CDBG FUNDS WOULD BE USED FOR: Share in the cost for installation and/or improvement of infrastructure within the Proposed area including curb gutter,sidewalk handicap ramps and roadway. 7. DOES YOUR PROJECT CREATE INDIVIDUAL/BUSINESS DISPLACEMENT OR RELOCATION? ❑ YES ®NO 8. ELIBIBILITY: The proposed project benefits low-moderate income persons by meeting the CDBG Goals&Objectives (See ELIGIBILITY attached): ❑ Public Acquisition of Property 24 CFR 570.201(a): ® Public Facilities(new construction or capital improvements)24 CFR 570.201(c): ❑ Public Services 24 CFR 570.201(e): 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page I ❑ Economic Development 24 CFR 570.201(o)/24 CFR 570.203: ❑ Housine rehabilitation and preservation 24 CFR 570.202: ❑ Code Enforcement 24 CFR 570.202(c): ❑ Plannine 24 CFR 570.205: ❑ Other(describe): 9. NATIONAL OBJECTIVE: How does your proposal meet the National Objective of benefiting low and moderate-income persons?(See ELIGIBILITY attached)(SELECT ONLY ONE!) 1)❑ You receive household/family income and size data from each participant in the program(LMH)(LMC) 2)® Your project serves a limited area that is proven by census tract or survey to be a low-income area(LMA): ❑Downtown Revitalization Zone ®Census Tract# 201 3)❑ Your project serves only the following clientele(check appropriate box)(LMC): ❑ Elderly person's ❑ Homeless persons ❑Severely disabled adults ❑ Illiterate persons ❑Abused children ❑ Persons living with AIDS ❑ Battered spouses ❑ Migrant farm workers ❑At Risk Youth ❑ Other: 4)❑ Your project will create or save jobs that employ low/moderate income employees(LMJ) 5)❑ Your project addresses a slum/blight condition(SBA/SBS) LMA—Low-moderate income area(Census Tract or Survey Area) LMC—Low-moderate income clientele LMH—Low-moderate income household/family LMJ—Low-moderate income job creation/retention SBA/SBS—Slum&Blight Area/Spot(as designed by local government) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE AGENCIES Is this the first year for the program? ❑Yes ❑No Year program began? If you receive funding for 2009,how will your program be funded in 2010? NOTE: To be eligible for CDBG assistance,a public service must be either a new service or a quantifiable increase in the level of an existing service.If services are a continuation of existing services,this does not apply. Explain how your application qualifies: ❑ Continuation of Services ❑New Service ❑ Increase in Service 11. WHAT AMOUNT OF BLOCK GRANT FUNDING HAS YOUR AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT RECEIVED IN THE PAST THREE YEARS? 2008 2007 2006 Pasco $ 0 $ 138,750 $ 100,000 Richland $ $ $ Kennewick $ $ $ To what other agencies have you applied for funding and what commitments have you obtained for this proposal? none 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 2 12. PROVIDE A MAP SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT OR SERVICE AREA: INSERT MAP HERE 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 3 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROPOSED PROJECT AREA AREA OF WORK NR4 ZL e UEWIS �I`� Lij i ` fir. W --�.:' ice._ L O a M cr- ,1 • '`'�K^. r. �. k N 'fit!' ` i ..j P-AUTO N i St.'- ST WE 6,08 WE 1 ' � D�� LLJ J = z LLJ to ' W *I;� 10 NO�lb3 10 NOS�Od Z1 wLf `a _ . 0 3 '1 uj R-1 r . �7 1 u , 14 i - • � ;' .I - �` �' �- �� � ��fi, 'z `ter _ ` � -�� ` '' ``fir ,. , ..o _ _w ,• : ( , 3Ad 8VW30lvM I IL - 10 F — 3AH O`JfiH + 3AV 3Z10W` VAS i 704'f �• ,ta�J. owl fl *6 4:1 till z.y �{ dW' leek I Y E O of, So - - `j C L • / O U) p "4 i O �- 'MI . . arm . . � .. ' s � �� I,•�. 13. PROJECT TIMELINE-Establish milestones or goals of accomplishments by calendar quarter from the start of the project until completion: Date Milestone/Goal(include numerical performance progress if any) June 2009 Solicitation for bids Phase I July 2009 Contract Award Phase I August 2009 Construction Begins Phase I December 2009 Construction Completed/Project Completed Phase I January 2010 Prepare and submit end of year report Phase 1 14. BUDGET-Give a detailed breakdown of the total budget for this project including major expense line items(salaries, rent/supplies,office equipment,capital expenses,new construction/vehicles etc.). Show how the CDBG funds will be applied toward expenses and the amount and source of any other revenue you will be using. Total expenses should equal the total of CDBG plus Other Revenue. Be prepared to explain the budget and provide a copy of full agency budget upon request. EXPENSES REVENUES LINE ITEM $TOTAL BUDGET $CDBG FUNDS $OTHER FUNDS SOURCE OF OTHER FUNDS PERSONNEL: Salaries Benefits OPERATIONS: Rent/Lease Utilities Supplies CONSTRUCTION: Materials&Labor $285,000 $285,000 Engineering Materials Labor/Contracts PROPERTY: Purchase price Closing cost OTHER: (describe) $15,000 $15,000 TOTAL $300,000 $300,000 $ Additional explanation of the above budget: If you do not receive the requested funds or receive only a portion of what you request,how will the goals of your project be adjusted? What portion of your project will be abandoned,will fewer persons be served,etc.? Less infrastructure will be Improved,and less people will be served as a result. 15. PROJECT BENEFICIARIES-List the client data of persons whom you ESTIMATE you will serve with this project. Is your count by: OPerson,or by®Household(family)? 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 4 Total Number to be served 1,575 Number of clients below 50% median 1,320 Number of clients below 80% median 1,200 Number of elderly clients 236 Number of minority clients 1,181 Number of Pasco residents 1,575 (Should=total#above) What is the data source for the information provided above? Observation of the Proposed project area 16. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS ONLY-Show the number of new/permanent jobs to be created through block grant funding and the number of jobs to be staffed by or made available to low-moderate income individuals this program year. Total to Date This Program Year Number of new jobs expected to be created/retained Number of new jobs expected to be filled or offered to low-or moderate-income persons(Must be at least 51%) Position Titles Expected to be Created this program year SUBMITTED BY: Signature of Authorized fficial Title Date 2009 CDBG Application-Electronic.doc Page 5 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP08-001 APPLICANT: All-Pro Contracting HEARING DATE: 6/19/08 4515 W 9th Ave ACTION DATE: 7/17/08 Kennewick, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estates (21-Lots) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 2, Short Plat 2008-09 General Location: 3300 block of Wernett Rd. Property Size: 5.21 Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 21 single-family lots Square Footage range of Lots: 8,000 sq. ft. to 13,082 sq. ft. Average Lot Square Footage: 8,495 sq. ft. 2. ACCESS: The property has access from Wernett Rd. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (Low density Residential) with restrictions requiring minimum lots size of 8,000. Surrounding properties to the south, west and east are zoned R-S-12 and developed primarily with single family homes. A few duplexs and multi-family units are located throughout the neighborhood. 1-182 is located to the north of the site. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for low density residential development. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a determination of nonsignificance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. 1 ANALYSIS The City's land use plans for the last 25-30 years have indicated the property in question should be utilized for low-density (single family) residential development. While much of the property surrounding the proposed site has been developed with low density residential dwellings the site itself has never developed. The proposed plat can be considered an infill project that utilizes land within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary that was previously bypassed (skipped over) by development. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the site into 21 single family lots. The proposal calls for the development of single family lots that are similar in size to the lots in Newton's Addition located to the southwest across Wernett Rd. The average lot size in the proposed subdivision is 8,106 square feet. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 21 lots meeting or exceeding the R- 1 zoning requirements imposed by the ordinance that rezoned the property form R-S-1 to R-1. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have adequate frontage on streets that will be dedicated. UTILITIES: The developer will be responsible for extending the water lines, sewer lines and other utilities into the plat. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10-15 feet of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not encroach upon the buildable portions of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and at a maximum of 600-foot intervals and streetlights are located at street intersections and at 300-foot intervals on residential streets. All water and sewer utilities will come from Wernett Rd. STREET NAMES: The proposed street name will need to be modified to avoid confusion with streets to the south. IRRIGATION: The Municipal Code requires the installation of irrigation lines as a part of infrastructure improvements. 2 WATER RIGHTS: The property is within the Franklin county Irrigation District. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal code require the Planning Commission develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact": Prevent Overcrowding: Minimum lot sizes of 8,000 square feet or greater will address the overcrowding concern by providing manageable lots and usable open spaces. R-1 zoning requires a 20 foot front yard set back and no more than 40 percent lot coverage providing for open space on the lots. Parks Opens Space/Schools: The subdivision is too small for the requirement for a neighborhood park. The developer will need to provide a fee en lieu of land dedication. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The plat is laid out to effectively utilize the site consistent with surrounding residential development. The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth boundary and the development will occur on land previously skipped over by past development. This development would be considered an infill project. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat provides connections to the community by way of local access streets. Sidewalks are required to be installed when homes are built. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: Municipal water and sewer lines will be extended to the plat from nearby lines. All utility lines will be sized and installed to meet the standard specification of the City. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This preliminary plat will provide 21 lots for the construction of new dwellings for Pasco residents. Adequate Air and Light: The lot sizes and maximum lot coverage limitations will assure the adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The access street in the plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by local streets. The 3 preliminary plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review. No comments were received from the Transit Authority. Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive plan designates the site for low-density residential development. Policies of the plan encourage development to expand in a progressive and efficient manner. These policies also encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing of residents. Other Findings: (list additional finds as appropriate) • The I-182 freeway is located directly to the north of the site. • The site is currently vacant. • Each lot developed within the 1-182 corridor whether in the applicant's proposed subdivision or other subdivisions is required to pay a traffic mitigation fee of$300. • Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-3-C encourages development to expand in a progressive and efficient manner. • Comprehensive Plan Policy H-3-B encourages the advancement of homeownership. • Comprehensive Plan Policy H-2 suggests the city strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. • Comprehensive Plan Policy H-1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) there from as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the municipal code and standard specifications of the City Engineering Department. These standards were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer 4 service and funding for park lands. This preliminary plat has been forwarded to the Franklin County PUD, the Pasco School District and Ben- Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed plat is located on a site that has been skipped over by development. The development is an infill project that makes efficient use of vacant land that was previously passed over by previous development.. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low density residential development. Low density development is described as 2 to 5 single family units per acre in the text of the Comprehensive Plan. The policies of the plan (LU-3-C) encourage development to expand in a progressive and efficient manner and encourage the advancement of home ownership (H-3-B). Plan Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community while Plan Policy H-1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps, and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and findings of fact. The findings of fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. 5 The proposed plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to insure the health, safety and welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this plat. These factors will ensure the public use and interest is served. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the city council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. TENATIVE PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) At the time lots are developed all abutting roads and utilities shall be developed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This includes but is not limited to water, irrigation and sewer lines, streets and storm water retention. Sidewalks must be installed no later than the time each lot is developed with a house. The handicapped sections must be completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. 2) All intersections will require setback lines for appropriate sight distances. No fences, utility vaults or pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed in this area. 3) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "traffic mitigation fee" per the Municipal Code. 4) The developer shall install a sound wall along the north line of Lots abutting I-182. Said sound wall shall be a minimum of 8 feet in height and shall be placed on a berm that is a minimum of 2 feet above the finished top of grade. The sound wall must be approved by the City Planner prior to construction. 5) The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with construction inspection service expenses incurred by the City of Pasco Engineering Department. 6) The developer will be required to provide a deposit to the City of Pasco to allow the City of Pasco to hire a surveying company to perform 6 topographic surveys of the constructed utilities including manhole lids and flow line elevations, location of sewer stubs, water valves, water meters, irrigation valves, irrigation services, storm water catch basins, street lights, fire hydrants, monuments and other pertinent information deemed necessary, to the satisfaction of the City of Pasco. The developers will be required to provide as-built drawings for the remainder of the improvements. The City of Pasco contracted surveyor will be given an electronic copy of the design drawings to then insert their findings from the topographic survey. 7) The developer shall insure active and ongoing dust and litter abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision and construction of the houses thereon. 8) The final plat shall contain 10 to 15 foot utility easements parallel to all streets as required by utility providers. 9) The developer shall install a properly designed irrigation system with stubs to all lots meeting the requirements of the Franklin county Irrigation district. 10) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat drawings shall utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. 11) The final plat shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat." 12) All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 13) All storm water shall be disposed of through means approved by the City Engineer. 14) Submittal 8v approval of all construction drawings shall be in accordance with the Civil Plan Review Process adopted by the City of Pasco. 7 Vicinity Item : Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estat s Map Applicant: All-Pro Contracting N File # : PP 08-001 T N \ $2 ID ..- SITE ky Imo, ERN ETT R D AL LO . ! lam'■ ° i..; j ' `i 4 N s" . +,•. rpm. ` CO Aft fW i -SEABROOfK=CT . 6, JAX.ST y r 3c ^ ` . a • M .. Land Item : Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estat s Use Applicant : All-Pro Contracting - N - Map File # : PP 08-001 ` Vacant ,. Bz Vacant SITE r , LJ N WERNETT RD 0 CO CO CO in �� ResLL idential 0< & CT JAY ST �L Zoning Item: Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estat s Applicant: All-Pro Contracting N Map File # : PP 08-001 R=S=1 2 o R=S=1 SITE in WERNETT RD 0 N CO � CO M CO D 0 --o R=S=1 2 RO CT JAY ST REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP08-003 APPLICANT: Iglesia Apostloica HEARING DATE: 06-19-08 De La Fe En Cristo Jesus ACTION DATE: 07-11-08 2921 W Ella St Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church in a Residential District (R-1). 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 1, Short Plat 2008-09 General Location: 3212 Wernett Road. Property Size: 1.45 Acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Wernett Road. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer are available to the site from the right-of-way adjacent the south line of the property. The property is not currently connected to city utilities. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 and is developed with a single-family dwelling. The property to the west is vacant R-1 land which is proposed to be developed with single family dwellings (See Agenda Item V, B) All other surrounding properties are zoned R-S-12 and developed primarily with single family dwellings. A few scattered multi-family dwellings are also located in the general vicinity. I- 182 is located to the north. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the property and surrounding areas for low-density residential development. The plan does not specifically address churches, but various elements of the plan encourage adequate provision of off-street parking and locating businesses in appropriate locations for their anticipated uses. Policies of the plan also encourage the location of facilities for educational and cultural activities in the City. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a Determination of Nonsignificance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 (c) (RCW). 1 ANALYSIS The application involves the conversion of an existing 1,529 square foot single family house to a church facility. The house has an attached 441 square foot garage and there is a 1,248 square foot shop building on the site. The site contains 1.45 acres of land. The proposed church currently has a small membership of about only 30 members. The occupancy standards in the building code would permit close to 170 persons to occupy the building. The municipal code requires one parking space for every four seats in a church where there is no fixed seating. The existing membership would only require 7-8 parking spaces while the maximum occupancy load would require 43 parking spaces. The site has enough room for 43 parking spaces. However, the site currently does not have a hard surfaced parking lot for even 7 parking spaces. The site has some landscaping around the house and no landscaping toward the freeway on the north. Not only does the site lacks a parking lot, it lacks the necessary handicapped access facilities (ramps doors & restroom facilities). The house on the site was originally constructed in 1951 (modified in 1958 to the residential construction standards of that time. Converting the dwelling from a residential occupancy classification (R-3 per the IBC) brings with it number of issues. Places of religious worship are classified in the building code as "A" occupancies. When a building is changed from one occupancy class to another (from a R-3 to and A) the building is required to meet the life/ safety standards required for the new occupancy classification. In this case the building will need to have 2 restroom facilities meeting the handicapped regulations; Exit signage will be needed for all exits; exit doors will need to swing out (with an occupancy load of well over 100) and emergency lighting may be needed. Two exits to the outside will be needed for the main floor with modification for handicapped facilities. The basement can not be used for Sunday school classrooms, nurseries or other similar uses unless there are two exits to the outside. Another concern about converting an exiting house to a church is the structural integrity of the building. If interior walls are removed or relocated to create a sanctuary or chapel it may impact the stability of the roof. Additionally, adding the weight of a 100 or more people (along with books, book cases, a piano etc) to the floor of the house may add more weight to the floor than the floor was designed to support. If the special permit was to be approved it may be necessary to have structural engineering done to address these concerns. The A occupancy requirements of the building code have been developed from years of experience with places of assembly and have been enacted into law for 2 the life safety and protection of people occupying churches and other gathering places. Churches are typically located in or adjacent to residential zoning districts within the city. The operational history of churches within Pasco has shown that churches generate very few complaints from adjoining property owners. The complaints that are received are often related to traffic. The church near the intersection of Wernett and 28th Ave has generated some complaints about traffic. Most churches in West Pasco are located conveniently to collector or arterial streets thereby helping to reduce the impact of church traffic through neighborhoods. The proposed site is located half a mile north of Court Street north of a residential neighborhood. Road 36 is about a quarter of a mile to the west. Given the fact that it is the nature of all churches to seek additional members future additional may create some problems for the neighborhood. Other issues to consider center on the need for a hard-surfaced parking lot, curb and gutter, sidewalks and a perhaps a sound wall along the north property line (These are all issues that were discussed in the report for the Sun View Estates preliminary plat directly to the west). INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Churches are unclassified uses and require review through the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district. 2. The proposed church site is zoned R-1. 3. The proposed site is located at 3212 Wernett Rd 4. The site contains 1.45 acres 5. The site is developed with a single-family house and shop. 6. The driveway into the site is 10 feet wide and about 40 feet long. 7. There is no parking lot on the site. 8. The operation of churches within residential or commercial districts of Pasco generates few complaints from neighboring properties. 9. Complaints about churches usually involve traffic. 3 10. The existing building contains 1,529 square feet on the main floor and 1,248 square feet in the basement. 11. The building was constructed in 1951 with additional work done in 1958. 12. Existing membership of the church is about 30 persons. 13. The Municipal Code (PMC 25.78.170) requires one off street parking space for every 10 lineal feet of bench (pew) seating or one space for every 4 chairs in a church. 14. The building code permits an occupancy load of one person per every 7 square feet of floor area in assembly occupancies such as churches. 15. Based on the occupancy loading, the existing building could hold about 170 people. 16. 170 people would require 43 parking spaces 17. The house was designed and built for residential occupancy loads. 18. A church is an "A" occupancy under the provision of the International Building Code. 19. "A" occupancy standards are different than the residential occupancy standards. 20. The building on site does not meet ADA accessibility standards for handicapped access and use. 21. 1-182 is located on the north side of the site. 22. There is no curb, gutter, or sidewalk abutting the site. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Policy LU-1- encourages the continuous actions to improve the City's physical environment. LU-2-B encourages the support of facilities for educational and cultural activities. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed use will not have an adverse impact on public infrastructure. However, as the proposed church grows it will create more demand on public utilities than the current residential use of the property and will generate additional traffic through the neighborhood. 4 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The intended character of the general vicinity is low density single family residential development. Churches are generally maintained and operated in conformity with the general character of residential neighborhoods. Traffic is sometimes an issue. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The presence of churches near residential neighborhoods in other parts of the community has not discouraged potential development or impaired the value of adjoining properties. As the proposed church grows, traffic may become a source of contention for the neighborhood. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Initial use of the property will not create more objectionable conditions in the neighborhood. However, as the proposed church grows, increased traffic and activities may impact the residential neighborhood to the south. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Churches are generally accepted uses in or near residential neighborhoods. Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do not endanger public health or safety. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the city council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. 5 Item : Special Permit - Church Vicinity Applicant: Iglesia Apostolica N Map 08-003 File # : SP Co Q CD SITE 0 NO LW WERNETT R � LO dftj r ►14 M •ice N . �. CIO co -PO s: Q -�k O -AL^ 6dWj ,, ` T _ t•�" SEABROOKACT '� . , f '' Land Item : Special Permit - Church � Use Applicant : Iglesia Apostolica -(x} Map File # : SP 08-003 ` Vacant �— Vacant 0 J SITE � \ l WERNETT RD LO � Residential p c' -J EA JAY ST 7 p Zoning Item : Special Permit - Church Applicant : Iglesia Apostolica x Map File # : SP 08-003 ........... R=S=1 J ¢ ,�- R-S-1 -J SITE wERNE,. ao CN p R=S=1 2 �--� �,_ EAa,ao� JAY ST REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP08-004 APPLICANT: Iglesia Bautista HEARING DATE: 06-19-08 El Calvario ACTION DATE: 07-17-08 3909 W. 471h Ave. Kennewick, WA 99337 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church in a C-1 District 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lots 7 & 8 Block 7, Pettits 2nd Addition General Location: 216 North 11th Ave. Property Size: 5,750 sq. ft. 2. ACCESS: The site has access from 11th Ave. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer are available to the site from the right-of-way adjacent the south line of the property. The property is not currently connected to city utilities. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-1 and is developed with a single-family dwelling. The properties to the north, south and east are all zoned C-1. The Bank of the West is located on the east side of 11 th Ave and a vacant lot and car wash are located to the south of the site. A vacant commercial building and vacant lot are located to the north. The properties to the west are zoned R-2 and developed with single family dwellings. S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for future low density residential, but is adjacent areas (to the south 8v east) that are designated for commercial uses. The site can be considered in a transition area that could be developed for either commercial activities or for residential development. The plan does not specifically address churches, but various elements of the plan encourage adequate provision of off-street parking and locating businesses in appropriate locations for their anticipated uses. Policies of the plan also encourage the location of facilities for educational and cultural activities in the City. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a Determination of Nonsignificance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 (c) (RCW). 1 ANALYSIS The application involves the conversion of an existing 884 square foot single family house to a church facility. The site contains 5,750 square feet of land and has a small (10 ft. wide) driveway and parking pad off 11th Ave. The yard area around the house has been poorly maintained for many years. Although the proposed church has only 20 members at the current time the occupancy standards in the building code would permit close to 100 persons to occupy the building. The municipal code requires one parking space for every four seats in a church where there is no fixed seating. The existing membership would only require 5 parking spaces while the maximum occupancy load would require 25 parking spaces. The site is not large enough for 25 parking spaces. The site is totally lacking in necessary landscaping. In addition to the lack of landscaping the site does not have a paved parking lot or the necessary handicapped access facilities (ramps doors & restroom facilities). The house on the site was originally constructed in 1951 to the residential construction standards of that time. Converting the dwelling from a residential occupancy classification (R-3 per the IBC) brings with it a number of issues. Places of religious worship are classified in the building code as "A" occupancies. When a building is changed from one occupancy class to another (from a R-3 to and A) the building is required to meet the life/safety standards required for the new occupancy classification. In this case the building will need to have 2 restroom facilities meeting the handicapped regulations; Exit signage will be needed for all exits; exit doors will need to swing out (with an occupancy load of 50); and emergency lighting may be needed. Two exits to the outside will be need for the main floor with modification for handicapped facilities. The basement can not be used for Sunday school classrooms, nurseries or other similar uses unless there are two exits. Another concern about converting an exiting house to a church is the structural integrity of the building. If interior walls are removed or relocated to create a sanctuary or chapel it may impact the stability of the roof. Additionally, adding the weight of 50 or more people (along with books, book cases, a piano etc) to the floor of the house may add more weight to the floor than the floor was designed to support. If the special permit was to be approved it may be necessary to have structural engineering done to address these concerns. The "A" occupancy requirements of the building code have been developed from years of experience with places of assembly and have been enacted in to law for the life, safety, and protection of people occupying churches and other gathering places. 2 Churches are typically located in or adjacent to residential zoning districts within the city. The operational history of churches within Pasco has shown churches generate very few complaints from adjoining property owners. Churches are generally well maintained and add to the overall appearance and character of the community. Given the fact that it is the nature of all churches to seek additional members the size of the lot and house in question will pose practical difficulties for the proposed church to expand beyond 20 members. The lot is smaller than most of the new residential lots being developed today so there is no room to accommodate future growth. There is only room for about 5 parking stalls in the rear of the house and two on the driveway in the front. That allows the church to have 28 members. The vacant lot to the south may be available for future expansion but it is only 8,625 square feet in size and of that square footage about 1,100 will be need for the setback landscaping. INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Churches are unclassified uses and require review through the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district. 2. The proposed church site is zoned C-1. 3. The proposed site is located at 216 North 11th Ave. 4. The site contains 5,750 square feet. 5. The site is developed with a single family house. 6. The vacant lot to the south contains 8,625 square feet. 7. The driveway into the site is 10 feet wide and about 40 feet long. 8. There is no parking lot on the site. 9. The rear yard has enough room for a 5 stall parking lot. 10. The operation of churches within residential or commercial districts of Pasco generates few complaints from neighboring properties. 11. The existing on site building contains 884 square feet on the main floor and 884 square feet in the basement. 12. The building was constructed in 1951. 3 13. Existing membership of the church is about 20 persons. 14. The Municipal Code (PMC 25.78.170) requires one off street parking space for every 10 lineal feet of bench (pew) seating or one space for every 4 chairs in a church. 15. The building code permits an occupancy load of one person per every 7 square feet of floor area in assembly occupancies such as churches. 16. Based on the occupancy loading the existing building could hold about 100 people. 17. 100 people would require 25 parking spaces 18. The current area available for parking improvements will only allow the church to accommodate 28 members. 19. The house was designed and built for residential occupancy loads. 20. A church is an "A" occupancy under the provision of the International Building Code. 21. "A" occupancy building design standards are different than the residential occupancy standards. 22. The building on site does not meet ADA accessibility standards for handicapped access and use. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Policy LU-1- encourages the continuous actions to improve the City's physical environment. LU-2-13 encourages the support of facilities for educational and cultural activities. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed use will not have an adverse impact on public infrastructure. However, as the proposed church grows it will create more demand on public utilities than the current residential use of the property. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? 4 The intended character of the general vicinity is a mix between residential and commercial. Commercial development exists to the east and the south. Churches are typically located in or near residential areas and add to the character of a neighborhood due to special architectural features and well landscaped yards. The proposed church initially will be maintained in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. However as the church grows there will not be sufficient space on the lot to accommodate any growth. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof The presence of churches near residential or commercial neighborhoods in other parts of the community has not discouraged potential development or impaired the value of adjoining properties. As the proposed church grows the lack of space on site will cause church members to park on the street or in the alley thereby impacting surrounding properties owners. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Initial use of the property will not create more objectionable conditions in the neighborhood. However, as the proposed church grows increased traffic and activities on such a small parcel may impact the use of other nearby properties. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Churches are generally accepted uses in or near residential neighborhoods. Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do not endanger public health or safety. A majority of the recently approved churches have been located on parcels considerably larger than the proposed parcel. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the city council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. 5 Item : Special Permit - Church in C- 1 Vicinity Applicant: Iglesia Bautista N File Map # : SP 08-004 '` + laO j 'Lot • �f SITE Rz- 4w At At 1 P T Land Item : Special Permit - Church in C- 1 Use Applicant : Iglesia Bautista N Map File # : SP 08-004 uCGr SFFty S Gr SA e0NN oy lv a�artl meC��a� Fz- � God` COX r'� FLes' card m Res' y lv a o�`'�' F�� ro°` �t G GLP gc Zoning Item: Special Permit - Church in C- 1 Applicant: Iglesia Bautista N Map File # : SP 08-004 R=2 e�NN oy R"2 � m YL `V\ C-1 C_1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP08-006 APPLICANT: Kingspoint Christian HEARING DATE: 6/19/08 School ACTION DATE: 7/17/08 3309 Rd 100 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a School & School Master Plan. 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the West 1/4 of Section 17, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., except the west 30 feet thereof. General Location: 3309 Rd 100 Property Size: 12 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Road 100. 3. UTILITIES: Water and sewer are available to the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-S-12 (Suburban Residential) and contains a small farm that is in a fallow state currently. The property to the east is in the county and is zoned R-S-20 (Suburban Residential) an contains a vineyard. Property to the south is zone R-S-12 and is partial developed with a church. The properties to the west are zoned R-S-1 and R-S-20 and are developed with single-family homes. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Plan goal OF-5 suggests provisions should be made for educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A Determination of Non- significance (DNS) has been issued for this proposal in accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. 1 ANALYSIS The Kingspoint Christian School, originally Faith Christian Academy, purchased the site in question in 2000. The property was in the County at that time. Prior to the purchase of the property the school applied for and received a special permit from the County for the location of a school on the site. In 2005 the school sold the south 6 acres of their land to a church. The church, Desert Springs Covenant Church, received a special permit from the City to construct their church in 2003. The church has since been built. As a result of the land sale and the significant lapse in time since County approval of a special permit and the fact the school development plans have changed a new application is required The Kingspoint Christian School plan identifies a three phase project with construction on the first phase to begin in the fall of 2008. The first phase will consist of classrooms and supporting facilities (offices etc). Phase two will add more classrooms and support facilities. Phase three will include a gymnasium and classrooms. Other improvement on the site will include a parking lot to be built in phases and sports fields. The completed school will house 350 students in kindergarten through grade 12. Schools and educational facilities have been permitted in a variety of zoning districts within the community; however they require review through the special permit process prior to issuance of a building permit. Special permits have been issued for a number of new public schools the community college and Tri-Cities Prep in the last few years. This has all been in response to the growth in the city's population. As the community continues to grow there will be a need to add more school classrooms. Because of funding allocations and fluctuations in enrollments school construction projects tend to be mutti-year efforts that continue over time. While the County special permit was opened ended with respect to a time frame for development the city typically specifies a time for completion or obtaining a building permit. In the recent past CBC and the Pasco School District and Tri-Cities Prep have all submitted long range (10 years) Plans for various expansion projects. The proposed school is anticipated to be built in three phase over several years. The school is therefore seeking a multi-year approval. Approving a multi-year Master Plan eliminates the need for multiple special permit reviews for individual expansion projects. It simplifies the development process and enables schools to quickly move forward on projects as funding becomes available. INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT 2 Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1) The Kingspoint School site is zoned R-S-12; 2) The site contains about 12 acres. 3) The Kingspopint School group have owned the site since 2000; 4) Franklin County approved a special permit for a larger school project in 2000. 5) Comprehensive Plan goal OF-5 suggests provisions should be made for educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area; 6) Population in Benton and Franklin Counties has grown by 53,000 in the last 10 years; 7) The City of Pasco has doubled in population since 1997; 8) Population growth has created a demand for additional educational facilities; 9) The site is located on an arterial street. 10) Water and sewer is available to the site. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Comprehensive Plan Goal OF-5 encourages educational facilities to be located throughout the Urban Growth Area. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? Sewer and water service is available in Road 100. The school will be required to connect to those utilities and contribute it's fair share to the cost of the utilities through payment of connection fees. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained, and operated to be in harmony with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity? Schools are typically located in or near residential neighborhoods. Schools and supporting facilities, (parking lots, sports fields, portable classrooms, & storage buildings) are an accepted part of the character of neighborhoods. 3 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The location and development of school properties on other sites within Pasco have not impaired the value of surrounding properties. Houses in the R-S-12 zone may be built to a height of 35 feet. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The operations of schools generally throughout Pasco do not create objectionable conditions for neighboring properties. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposed Master Plan identifies future buildings, parking lots, and sports fields that will be constructed to meet building codes that ensure public health and safety are met. School properties in Pasco have not been a source of complaints or the development of nuisance conditions. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the city council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. 4 Item : Special Permit - Private School Vicinity Applicant: Kingspoint Christian S Map File # : SP 08-005 0 MAPLE 1. ... s -•'�- � � � � ,' RED OAS -L1 % \ l��li�rli,t7li, !?1111';t?lt{�ii4 flfifii,,; !:iltiff TITMMiff f;fP'1 - r 1+��l1��fl�ill�i?li?ijf,ll�j !,!{iill�i (ft��lj lili�l�ljifl��lllll�ifls��jl10� MERLOT A ;_ - r • _ try, y- . \ 'O �, ✓ ,^ / . 1 : - SITE / F - / rn f_ ''. z • ;" I • � - w f CO w ARGENT RD � k T _ Land Item: Special Permit - Private School Use Applicant: Kingspoint Christian S Map File # : SP 08-005 MAPLE DR F-F- RED ROM � SFDU 's U SFDU 's MERLOT SITE Farming Uj g� o � W Church GiP ARGENT RD i { Z Item: Special Permit - Private School Zoning Applicant: Kingspoint Christian Scho N Map File # : SP 08-005 i � REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP08-006 APPLICANT: Franklin County HEARING DATE: 6/19/08 1016 N. 4th Avenue ACTION DATE: 7/17/08 Pasco WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a parking lot on the Franklin County Courthouse property at 1016 N 4th Ave. 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Blocks 6 and 7 Sylvester Park Addition together with adjacent vacated rights-of-way. General Location: 1016 North Fourth Avenue (Franklin County Courthouse Facility) Property Size: 5.6 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from North 41h Ave. and N 5th Ave. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the property. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and developed with the Franklin County Courthouse Complex. Properties to the north (Atomic Foods) and south (Medical and Law Offices) are zoned C-1 (Retail Business). Volunteer Park is located to the east and single family residential homes are located to the west. The park and the homes to the west are zone R-1. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as an area for governmental activities. Comprehensive Plan goal OF-3 encourages the provision of lands for public facilities. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a determination of nonsignificance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. 7. HISTORY: The original Franklin County Courthouse was built on Block 6 of Sylvester Park Addition in 1912. Over the years other 1 facilities have been added to or adjacent the Courthouse. In 2004 an addition to the jail was added to the northwest side of the Courthouse Complex. That was followed by the location of temporary offices and a complete renovation of the 1912 portion of the building during 2005 and 2006. Landscaping and fencing improvements have recently been completed. ANALYSIS The Franklin County Courthouse complex has existed in one form or another at 1016 North Fourth Avenue for almost 100 years. As the Community has grown the Courthouse facilities have also grown. Over the years court rooms and jail facilities have expanded to provide for the increased population. Within the last few years the 1912 portion of the Courthouse was completely remodeled and upgraded. As the public usage of the Courthouse facilities has increased the availability of parking around the Courthouse has become an issue. The address parking needs for the Courthouse the County has submitted a special permit application for a new parking lot fronting 4th Ave. The plan calls for the demolition of the vacant Health Department building and major site grading to eliminate the elevation difference between the existing parking areas and the land the Health building is located on. The new parking lot will occupy 50,360 square feet (1.15 acres) providing 131 parking stalls. There will be a net gain of 90 parking spaces with the new parking lot. Eight thousand four hundred square feet will be devoted to landscaping. The landscaping will primarily front 4th Ave. Government and quasi governmental activities are defined as a "Community Service Facility 1" and has such, require review through the special permit process before locating within the community. In reviewing special permit applications the Planning Commission is to be guided by the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 as listed below in the findings of fact section. To ensure that the proposed jail addition will be constructed and maintained to be in harmony with existing facility consideration should be given to the exterior finish of the portable building being placed on the permanent foundation. INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT 2 Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. The Franklin County Courthouse property is zoned R-1 2. Governmental facilities are defined as Community Service Facilities 3. Community Service Facilities are unclassified uses. 4. The proposed parking lot is located at 1016 N. 4th Avenue . 5. The site is currently developed with the vacant Health District Office. 6. The proposed parking lot will contain 131 parking spaces. 7. The new parking lot will provide 90 additional parking spaces over and above the current parking on site. 8. 8,472 square feet of landscaping will be provide with the new parking lot. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The site and proposed activity is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goal LF-3, which encourages the provision of adequate lands for public facilities. 2) Will the proposed use adversely effect public infrastructure? Demands on existing infrastructure will be minimal due to the fact the proposed parking lot does not need most public utilities. The proposed parking lot will lessen congestion on the surrounding public streets by providing additional on site parking. 3 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The proposed parking lot will complement the existing Courthouse Development and general character of the property to the north. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The site and surrounding properties are fully developed. The parking lot will not have any impact on the surrounding properties with respect to height. The parking lot will make room for more on-site parking thereby reducing off-site parking near other businesses. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The addition of 90 new parking spaces will benefit the surrounding neighborhood by providing additional on-site parking. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposed parking lot will aid in removing on street parking in the general neighborhood and will enable visitors to the Courthouse to have safe on-site location for parking. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move to close the hearing on the proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the city council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. 4 Item : Special Permit - Parking Lot Vicinity Applicant: Franklin County N Map File # : SP 08-006 _ MARIE ST OCTAVE F t -` pr.. w. f ) ♦ � '///JL�+ 7 � 'O 1�, •1 -.may '' ,'J:+^ ,,qq _ H NRX I Tw E 00 --Air ' 'MA' R GAR ET'ST a 1, t I k '�.• (' 'Iti i. .i � `.. ,:� t '' . rS. •�-•j:�tR+l�gw �«'►C!'4 F� Ott ffCF 1 mMIIl' t-�•1 _ •. r i ��, � �_.1"PEAR e: S"�f'� — •' "r',�" S� �- , o '�l/�M�lll�BlfFt1'tre r � ••i' Land Item : Special Permit Parking Lot Use Applicant : Franklin County - - Map File # : SP 08-006 MARIE ST —ITS \ Residential com L 1 Ll I I I-- OCTAVE ST M . H. Multi = lVac -family EITL a HENRY ST SITE _ `� om � v Residential Park LL Office n Public PARK ST 1�010111 5-� Zoning Item : Special Permit - Parking Lot Applicant : Franklin County x Map File # : SP 08-006 MARIE ST C -3 lot OCTAVE ST RP LL I c 1 Z11011 a CA R-3 72- R HENRY ST SITE 72- R=1 0 LE MARGARETS 11011 Fc 1 cmi PARK ST