Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-17-2008 Planning Commission Meeting Packet PLANNING COMMISSION - AGENDA REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. July 17, 2008 I. CALL TO ORDER: II. ROLL CALL: Declaration of Quorum III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Dated June 19, 2008 IV. OLD BUSINESS: A. Preliminary Plat Sun View Estates, 21-Lots (All Pro-Contracting Inca (3300 Block of Wernett Rd) MF#PP08-001 B. Special Permit Iglesia Apostolica De La Fe En Cristo Jesus (Franciso Barrera) (3212 Wernett Rd) (MF#SP08-003) D. Special Permit Iglesia Bautista El Calvario (Joe Franco) (216 N 11th Ave) (MF#SP08-004) E. Special Permit Kingspoint Christian School Master Plan (Georgia Perkins) (3309 Rd 100) (MF#SP08-005) F. Special Permit Franklin County Courthouse Parking Lot (Franklin County) (1016 N 4TH AVE) (MF#SP08-006) V. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. CDBG Program 2009 Community Development Block Grant Allocations (MF# CDBG08-002) - Development of recommendations for Citu Council B. CDBG Program 2008 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan Amendment (Cites) (MF #CDBG08-003) VI. WORKSHOP: VII. OTHER BUSINESS: VIII. ADJOURNMENT: REGULAR MEETING June 19, 2008 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chairman Todd Samuel. POSITION MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT No. 1 Todd Samuel, Chairman No. 2 James Hay No. 3 Andy Anderson No. 4 David Little No. 5 Joe Cruz No. 6 Ray Rose No. 7 Tony Schouviller No. 8 Jana Kempf No. 9 Vacant APPEARANCE OF FAIRNESS: Chairman Samuel read a statement about the appearance of fairness for hearings on land use matters. Chairman Samuel asked if any Commission member had anything to declare. Chairman Anderson declared he is a Board member of the Boys and Girls Club which is an applicant of the Block Grant and has no personal gain in decision making on the item. Commissioner Schouviller declares he lives in the vicinity of an applicant for a special permit and has no personal gain in decision making on the item. Commissioner Little declares he also lives in the vicinity of an applicant for a special permit and has no personal gain in decision making on the item. Chairman Samuel then asked the audience if there were any objections based on a conflict of interest or appearance of fairness questions regarding the items to be discussed this evening. There were no objections. Chairman Samuel asked the audience if there was an objection to either commissioner hearing the matter. There were no objections from the audience. ADMINISTERING THE OATH: -1- Chairman Samuel explained that state law requires testimony in quasi-judicial hearings such as held by the Planning Commission be given under oath or affirmation. Chairman Samuel swore in all those desiring to speak. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Hays, that the minutes dated May 15, 2008 be approved as mailed. The Motion carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: A. SPECIAL PERMIT Kids `R' Kids Daycare (Maria Aguilar) (1901 N 20th Ave) (MF# SP08-002) Chairman Samuel introduced the item and explained that it had been presented at the previous meeting and public comment had been received at that time. No further public comments will be taken during the deliberations. Chairman Samuel asked if there were any comments from staff. Staff briefly reviewed the proposed approval conditions and highlighted condition # 7 dealing with signage restricting the 20th Avenue parking lot for employee use only. Chairman Samuel stated staff captured the concerns of the Planning Commission with the proposed conditions. Commissioner Hay moved seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the Planning Commission adopt the findings of fact and conclusions as contained in the June 19, 2008 staff report. The motion was unanimously approved. Commissioner Hay moved based on the findings of fact as adopted seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Kids R Kids for the expansion of a daycare at 1901 N 20th Avenue with conditions as contained in the June 19, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved unanimously. Staff noted that the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the first regular meeting in July, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would cause a closed-record hearing to be held before the City Council. -2- B. Special Permit FARMING IN A R-S-1 ZONE (DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES) (7500 BLOCK OF ARGENT) (MF# SP08-001) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and explained that the Planning Commission had previously dealt with this issue and asked staff for comments. Staff explained the Planning Commission's recommendation on the DNR farm proposed for the 7500 block of Argent had been reviewed by the City Attorney prior to Council action. As a result of that review some concern was raised about the lack of specific standards on when a special permit review would be needed following the initial five year period. The City Council remanded the matter back to the Planning Commission for clarification of condition #9. Staff explained they had reviewed condition #9 with the City Attorney and have modified the condition so there can be no question about when a special permit review is needed after the initial approval period. The condition now requires a new application after five years. In addition to considering the review criteria of PMC 25.86.060 the new application will need to be considered in light of surrounding changes in surrounding development, the pace of development, improvements to utility services, the operations of Chiawana High School and the report of any nuisance complaints about the farming operation. Commissioner Little moved seconded by Commissioner Anderson that condition #9 under special permit MF# SP08-001 be revised as discussed. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. CDBG Program 2009 Community Development Block Grant Program Development (CDBG#08-002) Chairman Samuel made some introductory comments and asked staff for a report. Angie Pitman, Community Development Block Grant Administrator provided a brief overview of the CDBG program and explained the city would be receiving about $600,000 in CDBG funds for 2009. In addition there would be approximately $228,000 in Program Income available for reallocation from prior year activities. For 2009 the City will have a total $827,000 for project activities. Angie Pitman explained 13 project proposals had been received requesting a total of$921,000. -3- Chairman Samuel opened the hearing and explained that each applicant would be permitted to make a brief presentation to explain their proposed project. City of Pasco - Community & Economic Development (Program Administration) Dave McDonald, City Planner - ($110,000.00 requested) stated the application was for Program Administration to offset costs of administration of 2009 CDBG Program. The funds were necessary to cover program costs incurred by the city including program oversight, salaries and benefits of the Block Grant Administrator and Secretary II position as well as other related costs. City of Pasco - Administrative & Community Services (Civic Center - Youth Recreation Specialist) Paul Whitemarsh, Recreation Services Manager - ($37,500.00 requested) stated the application was for the continuation of recreation programs provided at the Civic Center in City Hall. The program focuses on low-moderate income at-risk youth and offers an after-school program which runs Monday-Friday after school into the evening and in the summer hours are all day from Monday- Friday. Chairman Samuel questioned the increase of$4,500.00 in this year's request. Paul Whitemarsh responded the increase was due to inflation, as well as maintaining the current programs available. Commissioner Schouviller questioned the types of programs available. Paul Whitemarsh mentioned the drop-in programs and scheduled activities. After-school programs include rock-climbing, basketball, volleyball, and floor hockey. Table games are also available. Homework is encouraged and assistance is available from the gym supervisor. Scheduled activities include youth and adult basketball camps and clinics, leagues, as well as the ability for team practices to be held in the facility. City of Pasco - Administrative & Community Services (Martin Luther King Community Center - Recreation Specialist) Paul Whitemarsh, Recreation Services Manager - ($37,500.00 requested) explained the funds were requested to operate programs for youth similar to the programs in the civic center. The YMCA has been operating the programs for the city with United Way dollars. The United Way funding has been cut from this program. -4- Chairman Samuel questioned where the non-CDBG funds come from. Mr. Whitemarsh stated the matching funds will be provided by the City, and not United Way. City of Pasco - Administrative & Community Services (Senior Citizen's Center - Staff for Senior Center) Paul Whitemarsh, Recreation Services Manager - ($37,500 requested) stated this program involve a range of activities at the senior center including recreational activities, social services, health screening, a foot care program and an income tax assistance program. The salary of the Recreation Specialist and Secretary is supplemented with this request. They are responsible for coordinating services for this center. Commissioner Rose asked about the use of vans for event transportation. Paul Whitemarsh stated buses are chartered for out-of-town activities. Pasco Downtown Development Association PDDA (Pasco Specialty Kitchen Victoria Silvernail, Manager - ($65,000 requested) explained the kitchen provides services to 31 individuals. Six individuals have been able to move out to their own store fronts. Other partners include the PDDA and the Pasco School District which operates the Commercial Food Academy giving low income students training in food sciences, product creation and marketing etc. Pasco Downtown Development Association (Downtown Fapade Improvement Gloria Garcia, Vice President, PDDA - ($80,000 requested) explained the various programs of the PDDA and stated the fagade program provides funding to businesses to make physical improvements to buildings to improve the look of the downtown area. The program provides 75% up to a maximum of $20,000 and the applicants contribute 25% or the remaining portion of the project costs. Commissioner Little questioned the average cost of a fagade. Gloria Garcia stated $20,000 was the average. Catholic Family & Child Services CFCS (Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Service Shari Hallman, 2110 W. Henry St, Pasco, WA - ($4,000 requested) stated her program has been functioning in the state for 28 years. They provided assistance to low income individuals elderly and others with disabilities by -5- constructing handicap ramps, rails and other minor home repairs. The funding is for materials only. All work is performed by volunteers. Commissioner Schouviller asked if there were any other funding sources. Ms. Hallman stated they received $10,000 from United Way this year, donations from individuals and some funding from the state for ramps and roofing. Benton Franklin Community Action Committee (BFCAC) - Energy Efficient Healthy House Program David Odom, Weatherization Department Director, BFCAC - ($20,000 requested) Stated the CAC provides weatherization services for low-income families as well as work on furnaces, water heaters and other conservation measures. The funding is requested to continue with these activities. Commissioner Rose asked who is eligible for this program. David Odom stated they get referrals from the Energy Assistance Program which is for low income and elderly people. Tri-County Partners Habitat for Humanity (aka) Habitat for Humanity Tri- Cities (Habitat for Humanity's Tierra Vida Project Support) Angie Pitman stated the applicant has withdrawn their application. Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton & Franklin Counties (Program Space Expansion and Safety Enhancement) Ron McHenry, Vice-President of Finance - ($50,000 requested) stated this program was for renovation and safety improvements to the stage area of the Boys and Girls Club. These improvements are needed to continue with services to the low and moderate income kids who use the facility. City of Pasco - Administrative and Community Services/YMCA (Martin Luther King Center Gym Remodel) Paul Whitemarsh, Recreation Services Manager - ($100,000 requested) explained the request was for partial renovation of the gym wing into usable space. The project was continued from last year. The renovation will create a more functional area in which to provide services to the neighborhood. City of Pasco - Community & Economic Development Inspection Services Department (Provide Inspection Services in Low-and Moderate-Income areas of Pasco) -6- Dave McDonald, City Planner - ($48,000 requested) explained the request provides partial funding of a code enforcement officer. This program has been in place for 20 years. The area of focus for this officer is in census tracts 201 through 204 which are identified as low-and moderate-income areas of Pasco. City of Pasco - Public Works (Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk and Roadway Improvements) Dave McDonald, City Planner - ($300,000 requested) stated the project include the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk and roadway improvements. The area of focus for the improvements is the neighborhood located south of Lewis Street, North of "A" Street between Wehe and Cedar. The Virgie Robinson Elementary School is in this neighborhood and low income students and families would experience safety benefit from the sidewalks and other improvements. B. Preliminary Plat Sun View Estates, 21-Lots (All-Pro Contracting Inc.)(33O0 Block of Wernett Rd)(MF#08-001( Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed subdivision site. Staff explained the Planning Commission previously reviewed a rezone application for the site and recommended it be rezoned to R-1 with a condition that lots be no smaller than 8,000 sq ft. The applicant prepared a preliminary plat in conformance with the zoning. Staff reviewed the written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission and explained the need for infrastructure improvements corresponding to the R-1 zoning and the need for a sound wall along the freeway. It was pointed out that the Washington State Department of Transportation responded to the SEPA notice by stating it was the developers' responsibility to dampen or deflect any traffic noise that may impact the proposed development. Staff reviewed the proposed approval conditions and discussed the condition dealing with the sound wall. Commissioner Little asked what type of sound wall was considered. Staff recommended an 8 inch block wall similar to the existing wall west of the site on the freeway. Commissioner Little further asked concerning the existence of different types of walls along the I-182 corridor. -7- Staff stated that a consistent pattern is needed and recommended. Commissioner Schouviller asked about sidewalks, curb and gutter currently in the area. Staff explained surrounding properties are zoned R-S-12 and are not required to have sidewalks, curb and gutter. However, property in question is zoned R-1 and is required to have sidewalks, curb and gutter. Commissioner Rose asked if the contractor would have the ability to choose the type of sound wall, and commented he would like to keep the sound walls consistent throughout. Staff commented the sound wall would be a condition of approval recommended by the Planning Commission. Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing for comments from the public. Arnold Haag, All Pro Contracting, 101 Jasper Ct, stated his intentions to develop housing for moderate income homes in West Pasco. Commissioner Little questioned the price range of the proposed homes. Arnold Haag commented the prices would be from $115,000 to $125,000 for 3 bedroom, 2 bath, double garage homes. Commissioner Little asked the impact of the costs for the sound wall. Arnold Haag responeded the price of the wall was not originally included in the plan. Lauren Mitchell, 3605 Agate, stated he was concerned about increased traffic in the neighborhood, and graffiti if a sound wall is installed. Lynn Hall, 2216 N. Road 33, stated he was concerned about the number and sizes of homes proposed being proposed. He was also concerned the project would devalue homes in the neighborhood. Staff explained that with the recent current growth in the community existing homes adjacent new developments have not gone down in value. Staff also explained that by law (GMA) the community was required to accommodate growth within the Urban Growth Boundary. Following three calls for further testimony Chairman Samuel closed the hearing. -8- Commissioner Anderson stated the sound walls needed to have a consistent appearance. Commissioner Schouviller asked about specifying an average price range for the homes. Staff stated the City could not require a minimum value for homes due to a number of court case on the matter. The city can only specify zoning and lot size. Chairman Samuel asked about increasing the minimum lot size for this zone. Staff explained the proposed lots are about 1,000 square feet larger than the minimum required for the zone. Increasing the size of the lots would make it difficult to cover the expenses for the sound wall, curb and gutter, street lights and pavement. Commissioner Rose moved to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat and schedule deliberations and adoptions of findings of fact and conclusion and make recommendations to the City Council at the July 17, 2008 meeting. Commissioner Schouviller seconded the motion. Some additional discussion ensued regarding street improvements and the need for a sound wall as a part of the approval conditions. The motion passed unanimously. Chairman Samuel stated the Planning Commission would vote on a recommendation for the City council at the next regular meeting. C. Special Permit Iglesia Apostolica De La Fe En Cristo Jesus (Francisco Barrera) (3212 Wernett Rd)(MF#08- 0 Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments. Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed site. Staff explained the application was for a proposed church to be located in a pre-existing home adjacent the proposed Sun View Estates discussed in the last hearing. Staff reviewed the written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission. It was pointed out the house was built many years ago to residential construction standards. Converting the house to a church changes the occupancy classification and the building code requirements for exiting and other safety issues. A change in occupancy will require code upgrades. Staff -9- discussed the issue of the R-1 zoning requiring street improvements, the lack of a hard surfaced parking lot, sound wall concerns that were raised for Sun View Estates, the lack of handicapped accessibility, and general property maintenance. Commissioner Little asked about parking lot lighting and if the restroom facilities would be hooked up to sewer services. Staff stated to accommodate the occupancy level requested the church would be required to convert to sewer services vs. a septic tank. Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing for comments from the public. Obdulia Chavez, translator for the Pastor Francisco Barrera, 2921 W Ella, stated the church wants a place to worship and pray. The church currently has 30 members and they have been in Pasco for 13 years. Their lack of growth may be due to the lack of a place to have a church. They are willing to fulfill the requirements of the City of Pasco. At present, their intentions are to remodel, and in the future, expand the facility. Chairman Samuel questioned if they are willing to accommodate the City's requirements for bathrooms, parking, building code requirements, etc. Obdulia Chavez answered they are prepared to accommodate the requirements. Commissioner Schouviller asked where their current place of worship was located. Obdulia Chavez answered they are renting space from another church at 217 N. Douglas, Pasco, WA. Ray Rojas, Minister/Contractor, 820 Wrigley, has evaluated the property and as a contractor he can convert the house into a church. They have been looking for a place that can accommodate their members. Chairman Samuel questioned after renovations are made, would the outward appearance be changed considering the current condition is not very appealing. Ray Rojas stated they have plans to upgrade the look of the church. Commissioner Little asked if they understood the improvements would need to be completed prior to occupancy. Ray Rojas stated yes, they are fully aware and are anxious to get started. la Lauren Mitchell, 3605 Agate, was concerned with the increased traffic this church would bring. He also stated the street is narrow and there are no sidewalks. Terry Kirkwood, Kennewick, stated Road 32 is the widest street in the area. It is even wider than Road 68; it has a traffic signal at Court Street and he feels there will be no problems with traffic. He also stated his father built the house and it is a solid house. Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Schouviller moved, seconded by Commissioner Little, to close the hearing on a proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoption of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. The motion was unanimously approved. D. Special Permit Iglesia Bautista El Calvario (Joe Franco)(216 N. 11th Ave)(MF#08-004) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments. Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed site. Staff explained the application was for a proposed church to be located in a pre-existing home in a commercial zoning district on N 11th Ave. Staff reviewed the surrounding land uses and the written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission. Staff explained that as with the previous church application, converting a house to a church changes the occupancy classification and the building code requirements for exiting and other safety issues. The site lacks of a hard surfaced parking and lacks landscaping. Other concern related to the serving of liquor on nearby commercial properties. Chairman Samuel asked about the situation with the current church located in the vicinity. Staff stated the church to the north was required to provide a hard surface parking lot, make structural renovations, provided landscaping to improve the appearance of the lot. Commissioner Little asked about the hours of operation for services. Staff commented churches typically operate on Sundays and hold a weekly night meeting. 1- Chairman Samuel opened the hearing for public comment. Joe Franco, 3909 W. 47th, Kennewick, represents the church and stated they have been renting space from another church. He has prepared a budget and proposal to purchase their own church. They currently have 20 members. The building has new stucco, A/C, and paint. He stated there are two stairwells to the basement. He further noted he is a federal employee and understands rules and regulations and intends to follow all requirements of the City. Services will be held on Sundays and Wednesday evenings. Chairman Samuel questioned the parking situation. Mr. Franco stated there is a slab in the rear of the property that has enough room for 6 cars, as well as in the front of the property with a 1 car garage and a driveway that would allow for 1-2 additional parking spaces. Chairman Samuel asked staff about any similar parking situations. Staff commented there are several other similar parking situations in the City of Pasco which have alley access to parking. Chairman Samuel opened the hearing for public comment. Roy Fiesic, 1812 W. Sylvester, stated he is a member of the neighboring church and welcomes the addition to the neighborhood. Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing. Staff and the Planning Commission discussed the need to improve the exterior landscaping, improve the parking lot area, address building code issues and add a storm water drainage system near the alley. Commissioner Anderson asked about the occupancy number for this site. Staff stated the code permit one person per 7 square feet. The building in theory could hold 100 people based on square footage. Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Hay, to close the hearing on a proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoptions of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. E. Special Permit Kingspoint Christian School Master Plan (Georgia Perkins)(33O9 Rd 1OO)(MF#08-005) 42 Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments. Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed site. The application was for a private school. The county previously granted a special permit for a the school on the proposed site but due to the length of time since that approval and given the fact the scope of the project has changed a new special permit is needed. Staff reviewed the written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission and explained the proposed site plan. Chairman Samuel opened the hearing for public comment. Bill McCue, 2211 S. Highlands Blvd, South Richland, stated he was the architect for this project and then proceeded to view the three phase plan containing the parking lot, classroom wings, gymnasium and playfields. Chairman Samuel asked Mr. McCue the number of students intended for Phase 1. Mr. McCue stated for Phase 1 there will be 100 students, with the Master Plan projecting a total of 200 students. Tim Casnick, 10104 Willow Way, stated he has lived in the area for 10 years and is concerned with the increased traffic this school will create. He commented about the current speed limit of 35 mph and was concerned about student safety. He questioned if there would be enough room for a turn lane. Georgia Perkins, Principal for Kingspoint Christian School, 5007 Richardson Road, commented on the driveway and stated they have a contract allowing Mrs. Olson to reside at the residence until her death and at that time the house will be leveled and the land added to the playground. Tim Casnick asked about the lighting situation with the playfields. Chairman Samuel clarified Tim Casnick was not opposed to the school but concerned with the future plans. With no further comments, Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing. Staff stated the special permit granted by the county contained a number of conditions including improvements to Road 100 with curb, gutter and sidewalk additions for safety for the children. A fence with screen was required by the County. Similar conditions would be needed for this application. Chairman Samuel referenced the light study performed at the Tri-City Prep to be guidance for the recommendation for lighting issues. 4a Staff suggested the applicant move the soccer farther to the south to prevent balls from going over the fence. The applicant had no objection. Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Little, to close the hearing on a proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoptions of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. The motion was approved unanimously. F. Special Permit Franklin County Courthouse Parking Lot (Franklin County)(1016 N. 4th Ave)(MF#08-006) Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments. Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed site. This location currently has the old Benton-Franklin County Health Department building on site and it will be demolished to accommodate a parking lot providing 90 additional parking spaces. The Franklin County Courthouse and Jail are in need of additional parking. The surrounding properties are zoned R-1, Commercial, which include Volunteer Park and a mobile home park. Chairman asked if on-street parking would still be permitted. Staff responded it would be permitted. Chris Giles, 514 N. Nevada Street, Kennewick, represented the County and spoke in favor of the special permit. He explained the plan calls for the demolition of the old Health District building, extensive site grading and then construction of the new parking lot. The county plans on completing the parking lot this year. The parking lot is to be lit and will have camera surveillance for the protection of the public. Chairman opened the hearing for public comment. Michelle Kellogg, Employee from Lourdes Medical Facility, 514 N. Nevada Street, Kennewick stated they are very happy to see the proposed parking lot being built. Due to the lack of parking in the area, the hospital parking lot has been crowed and it made has made it difficult for patients to find parking. Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing. 44 Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, to close the hearing on a proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoptions of findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the July 17, 2008 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Welcome to Jana Kempf, the newest Planning Commissioner! Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. With no further business, the Planning Commission was adjourned at 10:10 pm. Respectfully submitted, David McDonald, Secretary 1S REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: PP 08-001 APPLICANT: All-Pro Contracting HEARING DATE: 6/19/08 4515 W 9th Ave ACTION DATE: 7/17/08 Kennewick, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estates (21-Lots) 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 2, Short Plat 2008-09 General Location: 3300 block of Wernett Rd. Property Size: 5.21 Acres Number of Lots Proposed: 21 single-family lots Square Footage range of Lots: 8,000 sq. ft. to 13,082 sq. ft. Average Lot Square Footage: 8,495 sq. ft. 2. ACCESS: The property has access from Wernett Rd. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (Low density Residential) with restrictions requiring minimum lots size of 8,000. Surrounding properties to the south, west and east are zoned R-S-12 and developed primarily with single-family homes. A few duplexs and multi-family units are located throughout the neighborhood. 1-182 is located to the north of the site. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for low density residential development. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a determination of non-significance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. 1 ANALYSIS The City's land use plans for the last 25-30 years have indicated the property in question should be utilized for low-density (single family) residential development. While much of the property surrounding the proposed site has been developed with low density residential dwellings, the site itself has never developed. The proposed plat can be considered an infill project that utilizes land within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary that was previously bypassed (skipped over) by development. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the site into 21 single-family lots. The proposal calls for the development of single-family lots that are similar in size to the lots in Newton's Addition located to the southwest across Wernett Rd. The average lot size in the proposed subdivision is 8,106 square feet. LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 21 lots meeting or exceeding the R- 1 zoning requirements imposed by the ordinance that rezoned the property from R-S-1 to R-1. RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have adequate frontage on streets that will be dedicated. UTILITIES: The developer will be responsible for extending the water lines, sewer lines and other utilities into the plat. A utility easement will be needed along the first 10-15 feet of all lots. The final location and width of the easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested easements; therefore the front yard easements will not encroach upon the buildable portions of the lots. The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire hydrants are located at street intersections and at a maximum of 600-foot intervals and streetlights are located at street intersections and at 300-foot intervals on residential streets. All water and sewer utilities will come from Wernett Rd. STREET NAMES: The proposed street name will need to be modified to avoid confusion with streets to the south. IRRIGATION: The Municipal Code requires the installation of irrigation lines as a part of infrastructure improvements. 2 WATER RIGHTS: The property is within the Franklin county Irrigation District. FINDINGS OF FACT State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal code require the Planning Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact": Prevent Overcrowding: Minimum lot sizes of 8,000 square feet or greater will address the overcrowding concern by providing manageable lots and usable open spaces. R-1 zoning requires a 20 foot front yard set back and no more than 40 percent lot coverage providing for open space on the lots. Parks Opens Space/Schools: The subdivision is too small for the requirement for a neighborhood park. The developer will need to provide a fee in lieu of land dedication. Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The plat is laid out to effectively utilize the site consistent with surrounding residential development. The site is within the Pasco Urban Growth boundary and the development will occur on land previously skipped over by past development. This development would be considered an infill project. Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat provides connections to the community by way of local access streets. Sidewalks are required to be installed when homes are built. Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: Municipal water and sewer lines will be extended to the plat from nearby lines. All utility lines will be sized and installed to meet the standard specification of the City. Provision of Housing for State Residents: This preliminary plat will provide 21 lots for the construction of new dwellings for Pasco residents. Adequate Air and Light: The lot sizes and maximum lot coverage limitations will assure the adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot. Proper Access & Travel: The access street in the plat will be paved and developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot. Connections to the community will be provided by local streets. The preliminary plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review. No comments were received from the Transit Authority. 3 Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive plan designates the site for low-density residential development. Policies of the plan encourage development to expand in a progressive and efficient manner. These policies also encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive to maintain a variety of housing of residents. Other Findings: (list additional finds as appropriate) • The I-182 freeway is located directly to the north of the site. • The site is currently vacant. • Each lot developed within the I-182 corridor whether in the applicant's proposed subdivision or other subdivisions is required to pay a traffic mitigation fee of$300. • Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-3-C encourages development to expand in a progressive and efficient manner. • Comprehensive Plan Policy H-3-B encourages the advancement of homeownership. • Comprehensive Plan Policy H-2 suggests the city strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community. • Comprehensive Plan Policy H-1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed plat the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion (P.M.C. 26.24.070) there from as to whether or not: (1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops, schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for students and other public needs; The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the municipal code and standard specifications of the City Engineering Department. These standards were designed to ensure the public health; safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer service and funding for park lands. This preliminary plat has been forwarded to the Franklin County PUD, the Pasco School District and Ben- Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment. 4 (2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and land use patterns in the area; The proposed plat is located on a site that has been skipped over by development. The development is an infill project that makes efficient use of vacant land that was passed over by previous development. (3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative text of the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low density residential development. Low density development is described as 2 to 5 single family units per acre in the text of the Comprehensive Plan. The policies of the plan (LU-3-C) encourage development to expand in a progressive and efficient manner and encourage the advancement of home ownership (H-3-B). Plan Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a variety of housing options for residents of the community while Plan Policy H-1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established character of viable residential neighborhoods. (4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City Council; Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps, and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three above. (5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and findings of fact. The findings of fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general purposes of the subdivision regulations. (6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed subdivision. The proposed plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all City standards designed to insure the health, safety and welfare of the community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through development of this plat. These factors will ensure the public use and interest is served. 5 RECOMMENDATION MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact numbers and the conclusions as contained in the staff report of July 17, 2008. MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of fact and conclusions there from the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Sun View Estates with conditions as listed in the staff report of July 17, 2008. PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS 1) At the time lots are developed all abutting roads and utilities shall be developed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This includes but is not limited to water, irrigation and sewer lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention. Sidewalks must be installed no later than the time each lot is developed with a house. The handicapped sections must be completed with the street and curb improvements prior to final plat approval. 2) All intersections will require setback lines for appropriate sight distances. No fences, utility vaults or pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed in this area. 3) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "traffic mitigation fee" per the Municipal Code. 4) The developer shall install a sound wall along the north line of Lots abutting I-182. Said sound wall shall be a minimum of 8 feet in height and shall be placed on a berm that is a minimum of 2 feet above the finished of grade. The sound wall must be approved by the City Planner prior to construction. 5) The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with construction inspection service expenses incurred by the City of Pasco Engineering Department. 6) The developer will be required to provide a deposit to the City of Pasco to allow the City of Pasco to hire a surveying company to perform topographic surveys of the constructed utilities including manhole lids and flow line elevations, location of sewer stubs, water valves, water meters, irrigation valves, irrigation services, storm water catch 6 basins, street lights, fire hydrants, monuments and other pertinent information deemed necessary, to the satisfaction of the City of Pasco. The developers will be required to provide as-built drawings for the remainder of the improvements. The City of Pasco contracted surveyor will be given an electronic copy of the design drawings to then insert their findings from the topographic survey. 7) The developer shall ensure active and ongoing dust and litter abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision and construction of the houses thereon. 8) The final plat shall contain 10 to 15 foot utility easements parallel to all streets as required by utility providers. 9) The developer shall install a properly designed irrigation system with stubs to all lots meeting the requirements of the Franklin county Irrigation district. 10) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat drawings shall utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum. 11) The final plat shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat." 12) All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s). 13) All storm water shall be disposed of through means approved by the City Engineer. 14) Submittal 8v approval of all construction drawings shall be in accordance with the City's Civil Plan Review Process. 7 Vicinity Item : Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estat s Map Applicant: All-Pro Contracting N File # : PP 08-001 T N \ $2 ID ..- SITE ky Imo, ERN ETT R D AL LO . ! lam'■ ° i..; j ' `i 4 N s" . +,•. rpm. ` CO Aft fW i -SEABROOfK=CT . 6, JAX.ST y r 3c ^ ` . a • M .. Land Item : Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estat s Use Applicant : All-Pro Contracting - N - Map File # : PP 08-001 ` Vacant ,. Bz Vacant SITE r , LJ N WERNETT RD 0 CO CO CO in �� ResLL idential 0< & CT JAY ST �L Zoning Item: Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estat s Applicant: All-Pro Contracting N Map File # : PP 08-001 R=S=1 2 o R=S=1 SITE in WERNETT RD 0 N CO � CO M CO D 0 --o R=S=1 2 RO CT JAY ST REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-003 APPLICANT: Iglesia Apostloica HEARING DATE: 06-19-08 De La Fe En Cristo Jesus ACTION DATE: 07-11-08 2921 W Ella St Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church in a Residential District (R-1). 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lot 1, Short Plat 2008-09 General Location: 3212 Wernett Road. Property Size: 1.45 Acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Wernett Road. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer are available to the site from the right-of-way adjacent the south line of the property. The property is not currently connected to city utilities. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 and is developed with a single-family dwelling. The property to the west is vacant R-1 land which is proposed to be developed with single family dwellings (See Agenda Item V, B) All other surrounding properties are zoned R-S-12 and developed primarily with single-family dwellings. A few scattered multi-family dwellings are also located in the general vicinity. I- 182 is located to the north. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the property and surrounding areas for low-density residential development. The plan does not specifically address churches, but various elements of the plan encourage adequate provision of off-street parking and locating businesses in appropriate locations for their anticipated uses. Policies of the plan also encourage the location of facilities for educational and cultural activities in the City. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a Determination of Nonsignificance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 (c) (RCW). 1 ANALYSIS The application involves the conversion of an existing 1,529 square foot single- family house to a church facility. The house has an attached 441 square foot garage and there is a 1,248 square foot shop building on the site. The site contains 1.45 acres of land. The proposed church currently has a small membership of about 30 members. The occupancy standards in the building code would permit close to 170 persons to occupy the building. The municipal code requires one parking space for every four seats in a church where there is no fixed seating. The existing membership would only require 7-8 parking spaces while the maximum occupancy load would require 43 parking spaces. The site has enough room for 43 parking spaces. However, the site currently does not have a hard- surfaced parking lot for even 7 parking spaces. The site has some landscaping around the house and no landscaping toward the freeway on the north. Not only does the site lack a parking lot, it lacks the necessary handicapped access facilities (ramps doors & restroom facilities). The house on the site was originally constructed in 1951 (modified in 1958 to the residential construction standards of that time. Converting the dwelling from a residential occupancy classification (R-3 per the IBC) brings with it a number of issues. Places of religious worship are classified in the building code as "A" occupancies. When a building is changed from one occupancy class to another (from an R-3 to an A, for example) the building is required to meet the life/safety standards required for the new occupancy classification. In this case the building will need to have 2 restroom facilities meeting the handicapped regulations; Exit signage will be needed for all exits; exit doors will need to swing out (with an occupancy load of well over 100) and emergency lighting may be needed. Two exits to the outside will be needed for the main floor with modification for handicapped facilities. The basement can not be used for Sunday school classrooms, nurseries or other similar uses unless there are two exits to the outside. Another concern about converting an exiting house to a church is the structural integrity of the building. If interior walls are removed or relocated to create a sanctuary or chapel it may impact the stability of the roof. Additionally, adding the weight of 100 or more people (along with books, book cases, a piano etc) to the floor of the house may add more weight to the floor than the floor was designed to support. If the special permit was to be approved it may be necessary to have structural engineering done to address these concerns. The "A" occupancy requirements of the building code have been developed from years of experience with places of assembly and have been enacted into law for 2 the life, safety and protection of people occupying churches and other gathering places. Churches are typically located in or adjacent to residential zoning districts within the city. The operational history of churches within Pasco has shown that churches generate very few complaints from adjoining property owners. The complaints that are received are often related to traffic. The church near the intersection of Wernett and 28th Ave has generated some complaints about traffic. Most churches in West Pasco are located conveniently to collector or arterial streets thereby helping to reduce the impact of church traffic through neighborhoods. The proposed site is located half a mile north of Court Street north of a residential neighborhood. Road 36 is about a quarter of a mile to the west. Given the fact that it is the nature of all churches to seek additional members, future additions may create some problems for the neighborhood. Other issues to consider center on the need for a hard-surfaced parking lot, curb and gutter, sidewalks and a perhaps a sound wall along the north property line (These are all issues that were discussed in the report for the Sun View Estates preliminary plat directly to the west). INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Churches are unclassified uses and require review through the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district. 2. The proposed church site is zoned R-1. 3. The proposed site is located at 3212 Wernett Rd 4. The site contains 1.45 acres 5. The site is developed with a single-family house and shop. 6. The driveway into the site is 10 feet wide and about 40 feet long. 7. There is no parking lot on the site. 8. The operation of churches within residential or commercial districts of Pasco generates few complaints from neighboring properties. 9. Complaints about churches usually involve traffic. 3 10. The existing building contains 1,529 square feet on the main floor and 1,248 square feet in the basement. 11. The building was constructed in 1951 with additional work done in 1958. 12. Existing membership of the church is about 30 persons. 13. The Municipal Code (PMC 25.78.170) requires one off-street parking space for every 10 lineal feet of bench (pew) seating or one space for every 4 chairs in a church. 14. The building code permits an occupancy load of one person per every 7 square feet of floor area in assembly occupancies such as churches. 15. Based on the occupancy loading, the existing building could hold about 170 people. 16. 170 people would require 43 parking spaces 17. The house was designed and built for residential occupancy loads. 18. A church is an "A" occupancy under the provision of the International Building Code. 19. "A" occupancy standards are different than the residential occupancy standards. 20. The building on site does not meet "A" occupancy standards of the building code. 21. The building on site does not meet ADA accessibility standards for handicapped access and use. 22. 1-182 is located on the north side of the site. 23. There is no curb, gutter, or sidewalk abutting the site. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Policy LU-1- encourages the continuous actions to improve the City's physical environment. LU-2-B encourages the support of facilities for educational and cultural activities. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? 4 The proposed use will not have an adverse impact on public infrastructure. However, as the proposed church grows it will create more demand on public utilities than the current residential use of the property and will generate additional traffic through the neighborhood. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The intended character of the general vicinity is low density single family residential development. Churches are generally maintained and operated in conformity with the general character of residential neighborhoods. Traffic is sometimes an issue. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof The presence of churches near residential neighborhoods in other parts of the community has not discouraged potential development or impaired the value of adjoining properties. As the proposed church grows, traffic may become a source of contention for the neighborhood. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Initial use of the property will not create more objectionable conditions in the neighborhood. However, as the proposed church grows, increased traffic and activities may impact the residential neighborhood to the south. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Churches are generally accepted uses in or near residential neighborhoods. Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do not endanger public health or safety. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report. 5 MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Iglesia Apostloica De La Fe En Cristo Jesus for the location of a church at 3212 Wernett Road with conditions as contained in the July 17, 2007 staff report: Approval Conditions 1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; 2) No parking shall be permitted in the front yard area; 3) The parking lot must be hard surface; 4) All parking lot and site drainage must be contained on-site; 5) The front yard landscaping must be restored and maintained at residential standards consistent with PMC 25.75 6) All side- and rear-yard areas must be landscaped and maintained free of weeds dust and litter; 7) The building must comply with all requirements of the International Building Code for an "A" occupancy prior to occupancy by the church; 8) The building, including the basement, must meet all building code exiting requirements prior to occupancy by the church; 9) The building including entrances and restrooms must be ADA/handicap-compliant prior to occupancy by the church; 10) The Church shall install a sound wall along the north property line abutting I-182. Said sound wall shall match the sound wall of the adjacent proposed Sun View subdivision and be a minimum of 8 feet in height, placed on a berm that is a minimum of 2 feet above the finished grade. The sound wall must be approved by the City Planner prior to construction. 11) The Church shall connect to City water and sewer service; 12) The church must improve Wernett Road to City Standards as approved by the City Engineer. This includes but is not limited to curb, gutter sidewalk, street lights, fire hydrants, storm water retention and fire hydrants. 13) Occupancy of the building for church purposes will not be permitted until the church complies with all conditions listed above; 14) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco occupancy registration has not obtained by August 31, 2009. 6 Item : Special Permit - Church Vicinity Applicant: Iglesia Apostolica N Map 08-003 File # : SP Co Q CD SITE 0 NO LW WERNETT R � LO dftj r ►14 M •ice N . �. CIO co -PO s: Q -�k O -AL^ 6dWj ,, ` T _ t•�" SEABROOKACT '� . , f '' Land Item : Special Permit - Church � Use Applicant : Iglesia Apostolica -(x} Map File # : SP 08-003 ` Vacant �— Vacant 0 J SITE � \ l WERNETT RD LO � Residential p c' -J EA JAY ST 7 p Item: Special Permit - Church Zoning Applicant: Iglesia Apostolica N File Map # : SP 08-003 R=S=1 M R=S=1 0 Q 0 SITE WERNETT RD M M M M M O OQ p F-1 R=S=1 2 SEABROOK JAY ST REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-004 APPLICANT: Iglesia Bautista HEARING DATE: 06-19-08 El Calvario ACTION DATE: 07-17-08 3909 W. 471h Ave. Kennewick, WA 99337 BACKGROUND REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church in a C-1 District 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Lots 7 & 8 Block 7, Pettit's 2nd Addition General Location: 216 North 11th Ave. Property Size: 5,750 sq. ft. 2. ACCESS: The site has access from 11th Ave. 3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer are available to the site from the right-of-way adjacent to the south line of the property. The property is not currently connected to city utilities. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-1 and is developed with a single-family dwelling. The properties to the north, south and east are all zoned C-1. The Bank of the West is located on the east side of 11th Ave and a car wash and vacant lot are located to the south of the site. A vacant commercial building and vacant lot are located to the north. The properties to the west are zoned R-2 and developed with single-family dwellings. S. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for future low density residential, but is adjacent to areas that are designated for commercial uses (to the south & east). The site can be considered in a transition area which could be developed for either commercial activities or for residential development. The plan does not specifically address churches, but various elements of the plan encourage adequate provision of off-street parking and locating businesses in appropriate locations for their anticipated uses. Policies of the plan also encourage the location of facilities for educational and cultural activities in the City. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a Determination of Nonsignificance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 (c) (RCW). 1 ANALYSIS The application involves the conversion of an existing 884-square-foot single- family house to a church facility. The site contains 5,750 square feet of land and has a small (10 ft. wide) driveway and parking pad off 11th Ave. The yard area around the house has been poorly maintained for many years. Although the proposed church has only 20 members at the current time the occupancy standards in the building code would permit close to 100 persons to occupy the building. The municipal code requires one parking space for every four seats in a church where there is no fixed seating. The existing membership would only require 5 parking spaces while the maximum occupancy load would require 25 parking spaces. The site is not large enough for 25 parking spaces. The site is totally lacking in necessary landscaping. In addition to the lack of landscaping the site does not have a paved parking lot or the necessary ADA/handicap-access facilities (ramps doors & restroom facilities). The house on the site was originally constructed in 1951 to the residential construction standards of that time. Converting the dwelling from a residential occupancy classification (R-3 per the IBC) brings with it a number of issues. Places of religious worship are classified in the building code as "A" occupancies. When a building is changed from one occupancy class to another (from an R-3 to an "A" for example) the building is required to meet the life/safety standards required for the new occupancy classification. In this case the building will need to have 2 restroom facilities meeting the handicapped regulations; Exit signage will be needed for all exits; exit doors will need to swing out (with an occupancy load of 50); and emergency lighting may be needed. Two exits to the outside will be need for the main floor with modification for handicapped facilities. The basement can not be used for Sunday school classrooms, nurseries or other similar uses unless there are two exits. Another concern about converting an exiting house to a church is the structural integrity of the building. If interior walls are removed or relocated to create a sanctuary or chapel it may impact the stability of the roof. Additionally, adding the weight of 50 or more people (along with books, book cases, a piano etc) to the floor of the house may add more weight to the floor than the floor was designed to support. If the special permit was to be approved it may be necessary to have structural engineering done to address these concerns. The "A" occupancy requirements of the building code have been developed from years of experience with places of assembly and have been enacted in to law for the life, safety, and protection of people occupying churches and other gathering places. 2 Churches are typically located in or adjacent to residential zoning districts within the city. The operational history of churches within Pasco has shown churches generate very few complaints from adjoining property owners. Churches are generally well maintained and add to the overall appearance and character of the community. Given the fact that it is the nature of all churches to seek additional members the size of the lot and house in question will pose practical difficulties for the proposed church to expand beyond 20 members. The lot is smaller than most of the new residential lots being developed today so there is no room to accommodate future growth. There is only room for about 5 parking stalls in the rear of the house and two on the driveway in the front. That allows the church to have 28 members. The vacant lot to the south may be available for future expansion but it is only 8,625 square feet in size and of that square footage about 1,100 will be need for the setback landscaping. INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1. Churches are unclassified uses and require review through the special permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district. 2. The proposed church site is zoned C-1. 3. The proposed site is located at 216 North 11th Ave. 4. The site contains 5,750 square feet. 5. The site is developed with a single family house. 6. The vacant lot to the south contains 8,625 square feet. 7. The driveway into the site is 10 feet wide and about 40 feet long. 8. There is no parking lot on the site. 9. The rear yard has enough room for a 5 stall parking lot. 10. The operation of churches within residential or commercial districts of Pasco generates few complaints from neighboring properties. 11. The existing on site building contains 884 square feet on the main floor and 884 square feet in the basement. 12. The building was constructed in 1951. 3 13. Existing membership of the church is about 20 persons. 14. The Municipal Code (PMC 25.78.170) requires one off-street parking space for every 10 lineal feet of bench (pew) seating or one space for every 4 chairs in a church. 15. The building code permits an occupancy load of one person per every 7 square feet of floor area in assembly occupancies such as churches. 16. Based on the occupancy loading the existing building could hold about 100 people. 17. 100 people would require 25 parking spaces 18. The current area available for parking improvements will only allow the church to accommodate 28 members. 19. The house was designed and built for residential occupancy loads. 20. A church is an "A" occupancy under the provision of the International Building Code. 21. "A" occupancy building design standards are different than the residential occupancy standards. 22. The building on site does not meet "A" occupancy building design standards 23. The building on site does not meet ADA accessibility standards for ADA/handicapped access and use. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Policy LU-1- encourages the continuous actions to improve the City's physical environment. LU-2-B encourages the support of facilities for educational and cultural activities. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? The proposed use will not have an adverse impact on public infrastructure. However, as the proposed church grows it will create more demand on public utilities than the current residential use of the property. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? 4 The intended character of the general vicinity is a mix between residential and commercial. Commercial development exists to the east and the south. Churches are typically located in or near residential areas and add to the character of a neighborhood due to special architectural features and well- landscaped yards. The proposed church initially will be maintained in harmony with the character of the neighborhood. However as the church grows there will not be sufficient space on the lot to accommodate any growth. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The presence of churches near residential or commercial neighborhoods in other parts of the community has not discouraged potential development or impaired the value of adjoining properties. As the proposed church grows the lack of space on-site will cause church members to park on the street or in the alley, thereby impacting surrounding properties owners. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? Initial use of the property will not create more objectionable conditions in the neighborhood. However, as the proposed church grows, increased traffic and activities on such a small parcel may impact the use of other nearby properties. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? Churches are generally accepted uses in or near residential neighborhoods. Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do not endanger public health or safety. A majority of the recently approved churches have been located on parcels considerably larger than the proposed parcel. RECOMMENDATION 5 MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report. MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Iglesia Bautista El Calvario for the location of a church at 216 North l lth Avenue with conditions as contained in the July 17, 2007 staff report: Approval Conditions 1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; 2) The parking lot in the rear of the building must be hard surface; 3) All parking lot and site drainage must be contained on-site; 4) No additional parking facilities are permitted off North 11th Avenue; 5) The front yard and available side yard areas must be landscaped with at least 65 percent of the landscaping consisting of live vegetation as defined by PMC 25.75.030(4); 6) All yard areas must be maintained free of weeds dust and litter; 7) The building must comply with all requirements of the International Building Code for an "A" occupancy prior to occupancy by the church; 8) The building, including the basement, must meet all building code exiting requirements prior to occupancy by the church; 9) The building including entrances and restrooms must be ADA/handicap compliant prior to occupancy by the church; 10) Occupancy of the building for church purposes will not be permitted until the church complies with all conditions listed above; 11) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco, occupancy registration has not obtained by August 31, 2009. 6 Item: Special Permit - Church in C- 1 Vicinity Applicant: Iglesia Bautista N Map File # : SP 08-004 Or or s e N� Z L _ T i �, s Land Item: Special Permit - Church in C- 1 Use Applicant: Iglesia Bautista N Map File # : SP 08-004 owl e�NN oy Gym N� Res' �art� m Res' y lv a 'Ott Go ro°� G GLP sc Zoning Item: Special Permit - Church in C- 1 Applicant: Iglesia Bautista N Map File # : SP 08-004 R=2, - e�NN oy R=2 Yz- N� G s Yz- C-1 C-1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-005 APPLICANT: Kingspoint Christian HEARING DATE: 6/19/08 School ACTION DATE: 7/17/08 3309 Rd 100 Pasco, WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a School & School Master Plan. 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the West 1/4 of Section 17, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., except the west 30 feet thereof. General Location: 3309 Rd 100 Property Size: 12 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from Road 100. 3. UTILITIES: Water and sewer are available to the site. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-S-12 (Suburban Residential) and contains a small farm that is in a fallow state. The property to the east is in the county and is zoned R-S-20 (Suburban Residential) and contains a vineyard. Property to the south is zone R-S-12 and is partially developed with a church. The properties to the west are zoned R-S-1 and R-S-20 and are developed with single- family homes. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Plan goal OF-5 suggests provisions should be made for educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A Determination of Non- significance (DNS) has been issued for this proposal in accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. ANALYSIS The Kingspoint Christian School, originally Faith Christian Academy, purchased the site in question in 2000. The property was in the County at that time. Prior to the purchase of the property the school applied for and received 1 a special permit from the County for the location of a school on the site. In 2005 the school sold the south 6 acres of their land to a church. The church, Desert Springs Covenant Church, received a special permit from the City to construct their church in 2003. The church has since been built. As a result of the land sale, the significant lapse in time since County approval of a special permit, and the fact the school development plans have changed, a new application is required. The Kingspoint Christian School plan identifies a three-phase project with construction on the first phase to begin in the fall of 2008. The first phase will consist of classrooms and supporting facilities (offices etc). Phase two will add more classrooms and support facilities. Phase three will include a gymnasium and classrooms. Other improvement on the site will include a parking lot to be built in phases and sports fields. The completed school will be capable of housing 350 students from kindergarten through grade 12. Schools and educational facilities have been permitted in a variety of zoning districts within the community; however they require review through the special permit process prior to issuance of a building permit. Special permits have been issued for a number of new public schools, the community college, and Tri-Cities Prep in the last few years. This has all been in response to the growth in the city's population. As the community continues to grow there will be a need to add more school classrooms. Because of funding allocations and fluctuations in enrollments, school construction projects tend to be mutli-year efforts that continue over time. While the County special permit was opened ended with respect to a time frame for development, the city typically specifies a time for completion or obtaining a building permit. In the recent past CBC, the Pasco School District, and Tri-Cities Prep have all submitted long range (10 years) Plans for various expansion projects. The proposed school is anticipated to be built in three phase over several years. The school is therefore seeking a multi-year approval. Approving a multi-year Master Plan eliminates the need for multiple special permit reviews for individual expansion projects. It simplifies the development process and enables schools to quickly move forward on projects as funding becomes available. INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 1) The Kingspoint School site is zoned R-S-12; 2) The site contains about 12 acres. 2 3) The Kingspopint School group has owned the site since 2000; 4) Franklin County approved a special permit for a larger school project in 2000. 5) Comprehensive Plan goal OF-5 suggests provisions should be made for educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area; 6) Population in Benton and Franklin Counties has grown by 53,000 in the last 10 years; 7) The City of Pasco has doubled in population since 1997; 8) Population growth has created a demand for additional educational facilities; 9) The site is located on an arterial street. 10) Water and sewer is available to the site. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? Comprehensive Plan Goal OF-5 encourages educational facilities to be located throughout the Urban Growth Area. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? Sewer and water service is available in Road 100. The school will be required to connect to those utilities and contribute its fair share to the cost of the utilities through payment of connection fees. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained, and operated to be in harmony with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity? Schools are typically located in or near residential neighborhoods. Schools and supporting facilities, (parking lots, sports fields, portable classrooms, 8a storage buildings) are an accepted part of the character of neighborhoods. 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The location and development of school properties on other sites within Pasco have not impaired the value of surrounding properties. Houses in the R-S-12 zone may be built to a height of 35 feet. 3 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The operations of schools generally throughout Pasco do not create objectionable conditions for neighboring properties. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposed Master Plan identifies future buildings, parking lots, and sports fields that will be constructed to meet building codes that ensure public health and safety are met. School properties in Pasco have not been a source of complaints or the development of nuisance conditions. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report. MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the Kingspoint Christian School for the location and development of a school in the 3000 block of Road 100 with conditions as contained in the July 17, 2007 staff report: Approval Conditions 1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; 2) Development of the Kingspoint Christian School shall substantially conform to the campus Master Plan submitted with the special permit application; 3) The Kingspoint Christian School shall dedicate the west 10 feet of the parcel for the Road 100 right-of-way as a condition of permit approval; 4) All right-of-way improvements including but not limited to curb, gutter, street construction, sidewalks, storm drainage, street lights undergrounding overhead power lines, fire hydrants and utility services shall be constructed to meet the requirements and specifications of the City of Pasco; 5) The parking lot must be set back a minimum of 25 feet from the Road 100 right-of-way; 4 6) The parking lot must be hard surfaced and landscaped per Pasco Municipal Code 25.75.070 but, in no case shall the landscaping be less than what is shown on the master site plan; 7) The school building including the gymnasium shall be constructed to meet the standards of the I-182 Overlay District (PMC 25.58); 8) Storage buildings, sheds, concession stands and similar structures can not include container storage as defined in PMC 25.12.430; 9) The north and east property line must be fenced. The required fencing must be 6 feet high and must be sight obscuring; 10) The west property line north of the parking lot must be fenced but is not require to be sight obscuring; 11) The soccer field must be set back from the north property line at least 25 feet; 12) No sports field lighting is permitted; 13) The granting of a Special Permit does not give blanket approval to driveway locations and types of driveways. All driveways must be reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department prior to construction. 14) The Kingspoint Christian School shall pay the code required traffic impact fee in conjunction with building permits for each phase of development; 15) The special permit shall be valid until August 31, 2018 provided a building permit has been issued for the first phase within 3 years of the date of the special permit approval. The special permit will become null and void if a building permit has not been issued by August 31, 2011. 5 Item: Special Permit - Private School Vicinity Applicant: Kingspoint Christian S Map File # : SP 08-005 0 MAPLE ,., R�F� V RED ROAD // 4 / `Y5j3'X � 4 - M E R LOST 01 SITE / CO t y / Z ® ^ , •� e /L LIJ L 7 I 46 ° yQ �M1 �y .I a �, - ARGE T RD Land Item: Special Permit - Private School Use Applicant: Kingspoint Christian S Map File # : SP 08-005 0 MAPLE DR � RED ROM � zi tm D U 's v SFDU 's MERLOT SITE Farming / Z �O LU LU U 2 v ++ F Church GS ARGENT RD Zoning Item: Special Permit - Private School Applicant: Kingspoint Christian S Map File # : SP 08-005 0 MAPLE DR RS=12 � RED ROA RS-20 MERLOT RS-20 SITE (County) CD U 2 RS-12 UJ Ui 0 GSA, ARGENT RD ----------------------------------------------- 1N � � J '� r---r- i ! - N z L 4 � = 9 ! � ul µ S - 7 77 T77 711 1 11 i V •� ! i � l6 I 'i i II ! rli �o� I M ��8b 9b .L8 Nib 8'z59 III!I O£ I as II � i r------ I it F• L U UL ii li dw S Q I I I , ��e.a nevi fieman!.+7 �bs i ! UO a .n 3n3 z T�T II I i III m II!I 'i! O c i I!I Ili ! p O L ,N 6 ,J ] °Q Co O1 O N s O p Z .Co o 0 V 61 • O 4 L {I I Ql Ql C C I I N 3 3 Q W ya/��a s I o- o- Q I I • I I . . d to II'' IIII ' g I W I � a I I I - �X I v - t[1 u)to .� .tl I I I l6 lt5 l6 d W I I S S S Q. '! I I I SZ Q SZ III _ , - li li P �jT1 REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-006 APPLICANT: Franklin County HEARING DATE: 6/19/08 1016 N. 4th Avenue ACTION DATE: 7/17/08 Pasco WA 99301 BACKGROUND REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a parking lot on the Franklin County Courthouse property at 1016 N 4th Ave. 1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Legal: Blocks 6 and 7 Sylvester Park Addition together with adjacent vacated rights-of-way. General Location: 1016 North Fourth Avenue (Franklin County Courthouse Facility) Property Size: 5.6 acres 2. ACCESS: The site has access from North 4th Ave. and N 5th Ave. 3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the property. 4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 (Low Density Residential) and developed with the Franklin County Courthouse Complex. Properties to the north (Atomic Foods) and south (Medical and Law Offices) are zoned C-1 (Retail Business). Volunteer Park is located to the east and single family residential homes are located to the west. The park and the homes to the west are zoned R-1. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as an area for governmental activities. Comprehensive Plan goal OF-3 encourages the provision of lands for public facilities. 6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a determination of non-significance in accordance with review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW. 7. HISTORY: The original Franklin County Courthouse was built on Block 6 of Sylvester Park Addition in 1912. Over the years other 1 facilities have been added to or adjacent the Courthouse. In 2004 an addition to the jail was added to the northwest side of the Courthouse Complex. That was followed by the location of temporary offices and a complete renovation of the 1912 portion of the building during 2005 and 2006. Landscaping and fencing improvements have recently been completed. ANALYSIS The Franklin County Courthouse complex has existed in one form or another at 1016 North Fourth Avenue for almost 100 years. As the Community has grown the Courthouse facilities have also grown. Over the years court rooms and jail facilities have expanded to provide for the increased population. Within the last few years the 1912 portion of the Courthouse was completely remodeled and upgraded. As the public usage of the Courthouse facilities has increased, the availability of parking around the Courthouse has become an issue. To address parking needs for the Courthouse the County has submitted a special permit application for a new parking lot fronting 4th Ave. The plan calls for the demolition of the vacant Health Department building and major site grading to eliminate the elevation difference between the existing parking areas and the land where the Health building is located. The new parking lot will occupy 50,360 square feet (1.15 acres), providing 131 parking stalls. There will be a net gain of 90 parking spaces with the new parking lot. Eight thousand four hundred square feet will be devoted to landscaping. The landscaping will primarily front 4th Ave. Government and quasi-governmental activities are defined as a "Community Service Facility 1" and has such, require review through the special permit process before locating within the community. In reviewing special permit applications the Planning Commission is to be guided by the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 as listed below in the findings of fact section. INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record hearing. 2 1. The Franklin County Courthouse property is zoned R-1 2. Governmental facilities are defined as Community Service Facilities 3. Community Service Facilities are unclassified uses. 4. Unclassified uses are required to pass through the special permit review process. 5. The proposed parking lot is located at 1016 N. 4th Avenue. 6. The site is currently developed with the vacant Health District Office. 7. The proposed parking lot will contain 131 parking spaces. 8. The new parking lot will provide 90 additional parking spaces over and above the current parking on site. 9. 8,472 square feet of landscaping will be provided with the new parking lot. TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows: 1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan? The site and proposed activity is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Goal LF-3, which encourages the provision of adequate lands for public facilities. 2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure? Demands on existing infrastructure will be minimal due to the fact that the proposed parking lot does not need most public utilities. The proposed parking lot will reduce congestion on the surrounding public streets by providing additional on-site parking. 3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity? The proposed parking lot will complement the existing Courthouse Development and general character of the property to the north. 3 4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof? The site and surrounding properties are fully developed. The parking lot will not have any impact on the surrounding properties with respect to height. The parking lot will make room for more on-site parking thereby reducing off-site parking near other businesses. 5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the district? The addition of 90 new parking spaces will benefit the surrounding neighborhood by providing additional on-site parking. 6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses permitted in the district? The proposed parking lot will aid in removing on-street parking in the general neighborhood and will enable visitors to the Courthouse to have safe on-site location for parking. RECOMMENDATION MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report. MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Franklin County for the location and development of a new parking lot at 1016 N. 4th Avenue with conditions as contained in the July 17, 2007 staff report: Approval Conditions 1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant; 2) The proposed parking lot shall be developed in substantial conformance with the site plan submitted with the application; 4 3) The County and/or the County's contractor shall protect 4th Avenue at all times during the demotion and construction, preventing debris from entering the public right-of-way; 4) A traffic and pedestrian control and safety plan must be submitted to and approved by the City Engineering Office prior to the start of demolition/construction; 5) All water service and sewer lines shall be disconnect following the standards and procedures of the Public Works Department; 6) All sidewalk and curb and gutter currently damaged or that may be damaged during demolition/construction must be replaced to current City Standards and Specifications; 7) The parking lot must be landscaped per Pasco Municipal Code Section 25.75.070; 8) The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit has not been obtained by August 31, 2009. 5 Item: Special Permit - Parking Lot Vicinity Applicant: Franklin County N Map File # : SP 08-006 MARIE ST 446 - a �. �. b P n r i - - OCTAVE_ ST /` - - �:, 6, N y� �, , - e v fi �r HENRY SST . i O •,r - - _ • MARGARET- tiR; f t _ l� r1r�F"�rrpr sfF�fF�} � !al+R�l+l r i 6 ` y6. r _ M e ' � K 5 . i�' , -PARE\LS� mow " '� FJFt" oH1C4! Land Item : Special Permit Parking Lot � Use Applicant : Franklin County - N - Map File # : SP 08-006 ` MARIE ST Rcom OCTAVE s. M . H. Multi - � Ivad family HENRY ST SITE 'm om � I Park E � � Office Public Item: Special Permit - Parking Lot Zoning Applicant: Franklin County N File Map # : SP 08-006 MARIE ST w C -3 C -1 a OCTAVE ST RP _ - - ,l 01 M:TF] � R-3 TG R-1 HENRY ST SITE N 1 72- R=1 .3 1 MARGARET S , C -1 PARK ST S �,..,�--'" , C -1 0--- - - - - - - - - - - -- NORTH FIFTH A € € - - - - - - - - - -O In v '=I� O - - - — - - - —a - — - - — - - — - - - — - - — - - — - - - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - — - - o e I V p 0 I Eu [� p p I mG p° O au I E pp I it O FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL p p rG 0 o❑ IIII I p gg I pp I z Z i I I I O ° 0 O PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG, - - I-- - - - p p ' I p 3 1 F t: � I I d Lu cc i CD Cc F z -A � 000 p I } z 00000 �o--o O E- Y ooe ep ° W Z Q ooe eo p � = Q ' e© �E=l o 0 ° c� V G' EJ ° LL Z COURTHOUSE I ° Q Y z I I ° U Q ° cc Z ° LL o 10 0 CD i o WQ LLLLL ' I J z I ° ooee ° e ° oe° ° e °ee ° oeee ° eee ' co I ° I UJ o ® — W n PROPERTY LINE 65 Z v I Q HJ J co W CL co AREA OF WORK O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- NORTH FOURTH AVENUE - - - - - - - - - -O v °1 COMPOSITE SITE PLAN � of 4 t SCALE: I" = 50'-0' Of 4 9hBBt3 U UQ 00 fl6 FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL 60 Q0 EXISTING O ♦L♦`a♦♦a+r+r e b a``♦t♦r♦+♦+`4` r a `r a♦♦ + `♦ L` `b ♦ ♦ +r ♦} ♦, ♦r ♦♦` r f a ♦a t a f `.L`a+.a♦ a.♦♦♦+a+ `}a, ++ }`r♦♦+ •♦+ +♦ a♦♦ b♦ ♦♦♦}♦r♦♦#♦♦♦ ♦ a A S♦P H A♦L ♦ ` +EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK.+ L . ♦ t r ` r ` ` ♦ ` r s t r ` r ` , ` ♦ • ` ♦ r . , r ♦ ♦ + t • ` ♦ ♦ ` ♦ r ♦ ♦ ` . +♦+♦r♦}♦•+♦#+♦+`♦♦♦♦+♦ .+.`•a♦` ♦` .. ` ♦ . ` ♦ . ♦ ♦ . ` ♦ r ♦ ♦ • + ♦ ♦ + + r + ♦ ♦+ + + +♦ a♦ ♦ ♦ e♦ ♦ + 4 + ♦ ++♦e♦++ • +`r r+ {•♦ ♦♦♦ + ♦ 7 +♦♦♦♦ + ♦ + ♦ + ` # ♦ • + i • a ♦ a h L + + + + + + 4 ♦ + + + L + . a a . ♦ . a . ♦ ♦ a . . ♦ . ♦ . 4 ♦ ♦ ♦ { 4 + + . + + •++.r + ♦ r♦+ ++f + +++ ♦ t r r++ f r + ♦ r ♦ +.+ 4 + + r ♦ , , + v EXISTING PAINTED STALLS . + . . ♦ 4 a . + . . . . t + . 4 + + + . . . . . . . ( 6 2 -0 STALLS 3 -0 . . . a + h+ ♦ . r . , ♦ . + • r i r ♦ • • ♦ ♦ + ♦ ♦ ♦ + ♦ + f r r + + ♦ + ♦ ♦ + + ♦ ♦ ♦EXISTING ASPHALT f ♦ ♦ + + + + +s + ♦ ♦ r ♦ ♦ n ;;••T LF�.y�ZJ,7.I cu fio . �C �.` r } + a + { ♦ • O O Ck'F O.N O o i`,♦♦+a+♦a.,.•� 1 r ♦r♦{I11�4 r♦♦4 6 1 t �♦♦a+NrEp 1`�1 IV' PAINTED +I N+T E+D+STRIPES•`♦,♦♦ ♦4♦i SYMBOLS♦ ♦ - SEE Sa P EC + + f♦ s 3—r R.f ♦ +++ ♦ 4♦r♦.,++♦+, e+s ♦+♦ + ♦t♦ +♦ ♦♦++++♦.♦ a +r♦♦♦ ♦«+++.♦♦ ♦♦.P♦a♦ T +r♦.++♦♦♦+s♦+a,♦f♦++♦•♦t♦•+a+« +a s` +,♦+♦++♦♦+.+♦+♦t +a a ♦+ ♦+a,♦♦♦r i♦♦++,• +no ♦ + ♦ ♦ ♦ 4 + { ♦ . h ♦ ♦ ♦ . + ♦+. ♦ ♦ ` ♦ + . + . ♦ .♦♦ ♦ ♦ . . + ♦ ♦ . ♦ l + ♦ ♦ + + ♦ ♦ . ♦ ♦ . ♦ . ♦ + . ♦ . ♦ . ♦ ♦ } . ♦ + . ♦ + 4 + + . . ♦ . . + f a «a a . { ♦ ♦ ♦ a ♦ ♦ a r L L 4 a e ♦ , ♦ ♦ r a « L a L s r b • . + + + ♦ ` ` f + ` f ♦ + ♦ ♦ ♦ + fh fa ♦ f 4 f 4 ♦ 4 i ♦ ♦ i ♦4♦4 + + ` * i . ♦ ♦ ♦ • . ♦ r + + + • a a • a .+♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + + . r a + # h ♦ . + + + r ♦ + + .. ♦ . . + ♦ ♦ r . ` + ♦ r + `t ♦ ♦ + ♦ + NEW CATCH BASIN - SEE GRADING PLAN ♦ +♦♦` `' +iori—` 1.iT �.T4. ♦+♦«+♦+r •+i{r♦♦i a , e + ,• h e 4 ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦+♦♦ r r♦# ' ` ♦ + r + `♦ ,f♦♦. + +`♦+,4+ r♦ ♦ ♦ ♦. ♦♦ +4 }♦ ♦+++♦♦{+++♦` y W F— �'{� + 1�#+'.r,Q+♦♦♦•4♦♦.13'-11 f U 4'♦r.+r l l♦'-4 t 0'a Y+♦♦+'-}0'. +r 9'4-04 t'4 ♦.♦♦4..4♦+ +♦`♦♦h«+4' }( +.a ` r ♦ ♦ r ♦ N ♦ r ♦ ♦ r + ♦ ♦+ ♦ ` ♦ r ,♦ ♦♦ + . ♦♦ ♦r ♦ ♦ �♦ t v p fn 4 J JR, h r ♦ ' r ♦ . + . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + ♦ ♦ ♦ # ♦ . . . + ♦ ♦ f ` +♦ ++ + + + + + + + ♦ ♦♦+ + +.+ 1 1 1+*+l++*l++*+l++*+l++++ r ♦ + r ♦ . ♦ ♦ ` . . . . . . . . r ♦ . . ♦ . . . . ♦ . . ♦ 3 r ♦ ♦ ♦ r . ♦ ,,♦ + ♦ ♦ s s ♦ r♦♦ . + . . . rr • . . ♦ . . . r ♦ r + ♦ ♦ • ♦ . ♦ . . ♦ . . . . . . . ♦ ♦ . ♦ . ♦ . + ♦ r' 0 20 �9L511+++++..+++ ♦ ♦+ + + 4 L + + L. + 4 L + . i . . ♦ ♦ a + + + + . . + ` . a . + 4 . . . . + . L a . . + a L + + a L + + . + . « . + . . . . . . . ♦ . . . . ♦ . . , ♦ ♦ 4 . + ` + e . . f . ♦ f . . . ♦ ♦ . r . . ♦ 4 . + f r ♦ f r . ♦ , + . . ♦ . . . . P ♦ f . . . + . . ♦ ♦ + , ♦ . . « ` f ♦ ♦ + ♦ ♦ r ♦ , ♦ ` + ♦ . ♦ f ♦ ♦ ♦ . . ♦ f ♦ ♦ . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + ♦ . + f . f I ` ♦ ♦ ♦ f • ♦ ♦ ♦ . . ♦ . + ` ,t} . . « ` . . W L 1 ♦ ♦ ♦ a ♦ a . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + ♦ . a ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ . ♦ . ♦ ♦ . ♦ ♦ . + ♦ ♦ ♦ r ♦ . + ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ f a + . ♦ . . . ♦ ♦ r + , . ♦ ♦ . + ♦ . { a 9 4 ♦♦` ♦♦i♦ +♦ L ` ` ` ` 4 a + L+` ` + r ♦ ♦}L 4+a}+•a ` ♦ 4 + ♦ ♦ } a ♦ ♦ ` ♦ { ♦♦+♦ ++♦a a♦ a+ , ♦♦ ♦+♦f♦.f♦♦ r.+# ` 4 ♦ r`♦♦+a r r♦ *♦ .+r♦f+ . . ♦ + ` a . ♦ . ♦ + . « ♦ r . # ♦ ♦ . ♦ . . ♦ ♦ . ♦ . + ♦ a • . . ♦ . ♦ a # + ♦ . . ♦ ` , . ♦ + + } ♦ . ♦ ♦ ♦ . . . . . + . e . ♦♦s♦♦ 4 r+ +♦ + ,., ♦r ♦ + ♦{♦+ r a +♦ ♦`♦ +L r+i ♦ • + .♦P 4 r ♦ ♦ +♦♦ ♦+ ♦ + 1♦a r 1. 1pp1�JJ�� 11U�z ♦ . r + • ♦ ♦ . ♦ . . . ♦ ♦ + ♦ . . . ♦ . ♦ ♦ e f . . ♦ ♦ ♦ . + . + . . . 4 . . ♦ ♦ • , ♦ + + i ` a . . • r ♦ . e • . . . ♦ . . . • . . ♦ ♦ . . • . . . . ♦ ♦ + `♦ . i . . ♦ ♦+♦♦ . P . ♦ . ♦ ♦ . . + + + . ♦ . . a . ♦ . . + ♦ + , r ♦ ♦ + • ♦{ a + + + + + ♦ ♦• ♦ + + ♦ . . ♦ . ♦♦+ r 4 ♦ + V. + + . i a ♦ • ♦ ♦ • + 4 + ♦ L . . + + ♦ + • a • ♦ + e ♦ ++++.+++ `+ { ♦ . , ♦ + ♦ { + .1: r + , ♦ ♦ r + r + ♦+ r . 2 NE LAO PA `YPfC `V`I S 'A&L L NGt. + + + ♦ + + r + +f .++++r ♦ . 4 L ` + . 4 ♦ ` } ` 4 ` ♦ ` ` ` . ♦ ♦ + + ♦ a +♦ . + ` . ♦ . . . ♦ + + + + + . . + } . . . . + . . . . + + +1 . + . . . . + . . . . + + # . . . ` . . . .`. . . . .SECURITY EXISTING-0 4 . . . . . . . + . + CATCH ++♦♦ P . ♦ . . . . . . . . . ♦ . . . . , . . ♦ . ♦ . . + ♦ + .f, , ♦♦ .♦,.+ . ,++ r ♦ . . . . ♦ + ♦ + ♦ ♦ • , 1 BUILDING BASIN. ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ . +++♦ r+4 L a 4+i♦+ f+i«.i 1 t+♦i.♦ i♦♦. r♦+a ♦+L♦`♦a f♦♦♦♦♦ a♦4♦♦♦..♦`♦f+` .♦+ . ... *+'++♦ + . . , r , ♦ r ♦ + ` + r ♦ , ♦ ` . + + _ + + ♦ 4 14 ♦+ ♦ ` . ♦ + i a . L 4 L , L ♦ + 1 4 . ♦ . + « a b i + { ♦ } ♦ b L . . ♦ a♦ 2y—O++ 4 NY 25'-0 10 0 - ,r f + « .r`♦` � + `0` 0. ` a• ` `#.4 4 a.c♦r+,a o+ ` . ` `♦♦++` a`s« +♦-�`G}`♦ `♦.(o`. `. o+♦4 `♦`+<r.♦++ .` ..',.. +4 `♦ ♦♦`a++,♦ r a e lI V, ` ♦. +#. ++♦`♦a L r ` a++ .+`.♦L♦ a#a L L ` + .r♦4` ♦ + ' . a ` + . . ♦ a . . ` a ♦ + r . ` + . ` . ♦ a + a a . . a . . + + ♦ + + + # ` . . . r f . r ♦ + r r ` ♦ ♦ i r ♦ + r r e . . ♦ . . . . . f ` + ` . ♦ . . , . . ♦ . ♦ . . ` . . . ♦ . ♦ + . . . . . . . + . . , . . f . e . .+ .NOTE - ALL NEV LINEAR CURB 4 GUTTER TO BE PARALLEL + . r . . . ♦ ♦ . . . ♦ . . . ♦ ♦ ♦ . r ♦ . . ♦ r . e ♦ + . r ♦ ♦ . ♦ . . ♦ . • ♦ . . r . . ♦ . . a ♦ . + . . r + . OR PERPENDICULAR TO THIS EXISTING CURB L GUTTE • ` . s ` . . . + . + . . . ♦ . . ♦ . . ♦ ♦ ♦ . . ♦ ♦ . ♦ a 4 + + r + + h ♦ + ` . P a 1 18'-0 . . . . . . . . . + . 27 94' STALLS 243-r ♦ + . . . . + . . + . . • . + + +EXCEPT FOR THE CURB GUTTER ADJACENT TO THE ` . . f f . . ♦ 4 f + . f . r ♦ + 9 . .SOUTHWEST ISLAND ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` + ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ♦s♦ +. t . +• + ♦+♦+ +♦+ . . a ♦ +♦ + + +♦+ + + `+a a ++♦+ + ♦+ a+ + r+ +•r+ EXISTING EXISTING r ++♦ f o+f f♦` + . +♦f r ` ` + ` . ` rr + ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ r ` ` ♦ ` ` + f++r` ++♦`♦` ` rf`+++ + ++++r` BASIN. 2 . • r e ♦ . . . + . . . . + + + . . . . r • . . . r + a . . . . . . . . . . . + r a o +o c o o .o c=:==mj 0 0 .o a o EXISTING LAWN.,( NEW VHEELSTOP TYPICAL ( 47 ) LOCATIONS - SEE DETAIL 4. FH NEV LANbz,i;-a•i^ta - :,EE LANDSCAe'r_ u'.:r1'w In �; �+ 4 J PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEVAL" 35'-Ob EXISTING CONC. DRIVEWAY A NORTH FOURTH AVENUE CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN SCALE I V = 20'-0' u u PNEL W n� �n FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL � Lj b � ASPHALT PAVI U H IM 394.3 CONCRETE SIDEWALK . + r + r + t + « + ♦ + ♦, a T ♦+ • + ♦ . . + + ' + « + . ♦ + . ♦ + t + + + + +♦ .+ ♦ . + a + • . . + . . . + e + . a . a ♦ . . ♦ ♦ + ♦ + . e ♦ ♦ . a a a•.♦i + + # a . + a + + a + + .`# a + . i a a+.#. + + a + a ♦ + i a + + a ♦ +•+♦• a♦+ + + a #r++a++♦i♦#•+ #a. .+++a 19 LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION. + + *#+++ ♦ + + 3 J + ♦ ♦ r . r + t . r . ♦ . + 0 ♦ e ♦ ♦ + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + ♦ ♦ s + ♦ # e # • t ♦ • ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ t ♦ ♦ ♦ # + r • t + • + + # e + # + + ♦ e ♦ . r ♦ . . ♦ t ♦ . . + w ♦ ♦ + r A ♦ + ♦ • . r . ♦ ♦ 4 ♦ ♦ + + ♦ + + ♦ + ♦ ♦ + + ♦ + + ♦ + t + + ♦ + + ♦ . + ♦ . r ♦ + ♦ ♦ + . ♦ ♦ + ♦ + ♦`e 4 ♦ + W ///O gg�66 � 07 v + «♦4+++♦+♦+♦++a'+♦♦++♦++`.++++4+♦#♦`. +`+`.a .`♦.`++`♦#`♦+`i s.`4�♦`♦`+4#`+.4 a♦1`t`+ ♦♦e f++i ++++ ++ `y ` `f + ♦♦4 t ++1 a 4+ ♦r 1 + r ♦ + + ♦ f + 1♦ Y f C++i++♦`41♦` +f`♦a`+ ++`.`t 411 Y♦ ♦ . � ♦ + ♦ + ' +F- i + + + + + 4 + + + . + 4 + + 4 + + + 4 + 4 + +� *Vy L DRAWINS + +�A$ ALT PAVING—,,, r 4 ♦ + + . + ♦ ♦ + + a ♦ + r r + . . ♦ r ♦ ♦ r ♦ 4 . r . . . ♦ 4 r ♦t r a♦ r s++. +++♦ . + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + ♦ f . ♦ ♦ ♦ . + . + . + ♦ + . + t + t + t r ♦ . + . + ♦ +♦ t + + + + ++ ++ + ♦ + . # . + i a�/Z/zz' + + . ♦ + + ♦ ♦ ♦ a ♦ ♦ ♦ r .` + . ♦ . + + . . . a . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ . ♦ . # +a+a +ml, + ♦ ♦+ ♦4 ++ ++`a INDICATES EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB TO BE REMOVE + + . + + + +9KPJ+ + + ♦ . . ♦ ♦ . . ♦ . . ♦ ♦ . + . ♦ + . . a . . 4♦4 . «a + + + + + + + +++ 4 a 4 a ♦ . . . ♦ . +++ + + # + 4+a a + + + . + . ♦ ♦ + . + . . . . . . . ♦ . . ♦ . • + . + ♦ . . ♦ . . ♦ . 4 + . . + + + + + a + 4 + + . + + + + + + + + ♦ + + + t + ♦ 4 . + + + ♦ + 4 . • + ♦ ♦ ♦ + + ♦ + + . • ♦4+ + ` ` + + f ♦ . f + + ♦ . . f + a . ♦ . . . e ♦ f + a 1 N (B„7 « -0 ? # ++++1. a♦1Ff+♦41♦+♦«♦1+++f ♦ +♦1•/.7}`�J 1B A/(.fy+[�7♦pC. .++t#♦ # # ♦ e + + ♦ . ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + + ♦e♦♦+♦♦♦.+++t+f+.++♦++P BE♦ # # + . + . . . + ttT1C+yE. hL/LIi/pWVJ+y1DL]�{I�fy■�TN�RgyIS ♦ + + . . ♦ INDICATES ASPHAL7 PA + . + ♦ . . . . . 4 ♦ ♦ . . + + ♦ + + + + i 4 + + ♦ + + 4 # + ♦ # . . . i a + + # + + a . . . + + . e - + + . . 4 + + . + + e + #w��p+ ♦ ♦ + + + + + + + . + + . ♦ + + + + + + • . . + + • . . . + + ♦ ♦ ♦ + ♦ + r ♦ . r ♦ . + REMOVE TREE . + ♦ . + • ♦ r ♦ ♦ + . r . . . . . . . + • . . • 4 + + + + W + + + ♦ + + ♦ r e 30' DIAMETER TRUNK.r . + . . . . . . `. + + + + « + + + • + • • ♦ . . . ♦ . . a I i l . e . . . . . 4 # . + + ♦ + . ♦ + . . + . . + 4 + + + + ♦ + + . ♦ ♦ . . e 4 . • r • ' + + a + + + . • + a e s . + + + e . . . . + ♦ + a ♦ . . + . . ♦ + + + + ♦ a Y ♦ 4 + + ♦ + + + + + • ♦ + 4 4 . + + 4 + + ♦ + + + + r a ♦ + +tf + t + f . ♦ . . ♦ . . . r . . r . ♦ .'. • + ♦ ♦ r ♦ r«. .'. '. . • . . ♦ . + + ♦ + f r ♦ . '. . . • + •♦ ♦ • + + + • ♦ is + . + T ♦ # ♦4+ a` 4+ + + a ♦ts ♦ ♦ + + > 'a + + 4 + + + • a+a♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ + ` e a 4 + • ` ` ♦ 4 4 + + + + + + � fi • a ` s a a a # ` W r . . « . r + + + ,o a+oo o+ . �o pi o, ++♦++++♦ +`fa +4 ,,++++'++++ ++++. ♦++++♦+#•+♦+'+' +a 0`�Oe0 0GRAVEL TO BE REMOVED. ]°o + + + + U + + + + + # ♦ ♦ . . ♦ ��-+•. ��-YYY 4 + 387.79E F. + + . • + + . + + • + SECURITY CATCH ' E + ♦ e `'' + � HEALTH DEPT, BUILDING + + ♦ + ♦ ♦ + , ♦ + ♦ . + ♦ + a . . + + + . . ♦ . . ♦ . . ♦ . FfL BUILDING BASIN T° ' ' ' ' ' .. �'�” 3O7� REMAIN, + . + + + + + + + + + + + + a ♦ # ♦ + ♦ t--I+ __ +•rte + a . . . . ♦ ♦ . . . . . ♦ . . + + + + ♦ + + ♦ + a 387 90 TTTT . . . . . . . .+.1.j♦ . ♦ + ♦ . . . . . ♦ ♦ r . f + a a . . . ♦ . . . ♦ . . ♦ . 1L1 zzzzzzz ++ + + + + + + ♦ + ♦ + + + + , e + a a a ♦ a e +'+ a ♦ . . ♦ . . . . ♦ . ♦ . , + , . . « . . a . r + « + + ♦ + ♦ ♦ + . + . + REMOVE < 2 ) TREES. SAWCUT & REMOVE ASPHALT PAVING AS SHOWN— + + + + + RFMaVE+< I?I D CONCRETE WIRE gTIA 48' DIAMETER TRUNKS, & AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETE NEW WORK, + + + • + . + + . + + + + . • + a ♦ ♦ ♦ . + ♦ . r ♦ . + + s r ♦ . + t f + + + ♦ ♦ + + + . . ♦ . ♦ ♦ . . ♦ ♦ + + a + + 4 . + . . . . + ♦ r + LAWE�N ♦ , l" BASIN + .«t r. . . . . . . , REMAIN ♦ ' + + + —r i0 /IIr LIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE C ♦ . ♦ + ♦ + . a + {-. + + + + + ♦ ¢U�+CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, ++ ++ #+'+` REMOVE SIGN PANEL, STEEL POST L CQICRETE ' ' FMTWrz RETURN SD I PANEL TO UIDEIL +. «. . «. - W sates INDICATES CONCRETE SIDEWALK &/OR STAIRS TO BE REMOV . 35'-Ch REMOVE TREE. 60' DIAMETER TRUNK. REMOVE CONCRETE RETAINING WALL AT BOTH SIDES OF STAIR. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY REMOVE CONCRETE MOW STRIP. REMOVE CONCRETE RETAINING WALL AT 3 SIDES OF CONCRETE SL APPROXIMATELY 8' THICK x 5'-0' HIGH REINFORCED CONCRETE. x NORTH FOURTH AVENUE DEMOLITION SITE PLAN SCALE i I' = 20'-0' �' MEMORANDUM DATE: July 3, 2008 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Gran Administrator SUBJECT: 2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM ALLOCATION Requests for Funding At the Planning Commission meeting of June 19, 2008, materials for review and consideration relating to the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) for 2009 were provided. Thirteen(13) requests for funds were submitted totaling $921,684. Proposals for twelve (12) activities were presented before the Planning Commission at this public hearing. Estimated Funds Available The estimated entitlement grant for program year 2009 is estimated to be $600,000 with program income estimated at $10,000. Funds available for reallocation totaled $266,175, making a total of$851,175 in funds available for use in 2009. Actual available funding for the 2009 activities will remain in question until the early part of 2009 when the allocation is made. If funding levels are lower than estimated, program funding may need to be reduced accordingly. Public service and planning and administration activities may need to be adjusted to maintain compliance with regulated caps. Public Service Can HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support public service activities may not exceed 15%of the combined total of the entitlement plus the prior year's program income. For 2009, the estimated entitlement of$600,000, and actual 2008 program income of$12,914 makes the maximum available for public service activities $91,937. Current requests for public services total $112,500. This request is the same as last year. Last year funds awarded for public service totaled $93,500. This amount was reduced to $86,000 to comply with regulatory limits. Staff recommends a maximum of $80,000 for public services (13%) for use in 2009. Planning& Administration Cap HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support planning and administration activities may not exceed 20% of the combined total of the entitlement plus the current year's program income. For 2009, the estimated entitlement of$600,000, and 2009 program income of$10,000 makes the maximum available for planning and administrative activities $122,000. Current requests for planning and administration total $110,000. This request is $10,000 less than last year's request, but $5,000 more than was awarded. Staff recommends a maximum of$110,000 for planning and administration(18%). Recommendation After discussions and staff evaluation, it is recommended that the activities set forth in Attachments 1 and 2 would best meet the City's Consolidated Plan and be most effective in carrying out the objectives for the City in 2009. Your recommendation for approval to the City Council would be appreciated. Therefore, we propose the following Motion: MOTION: I move the Planning Commission recommend the City Council approve the use of funds for the 2009 Community Development Block Grant Program Year as set forth in the"2009 CDBG Fund Summary." The City Staff would like to thank the members of the Planning Commission for your time and assistance. /arp Attachments: 1. 2009 CDBG Fund Summary—July 17, 2008 2. 2009 CDBG Proposal Summary—July 17, 2008 2009 CDBG Fund Summary -July 17, 2008 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 Proposals-Recommendations ACTIVITY/AGENCY CDBG NonCDBG FUNDS STAFF PLANNING ID Recipients COMMISSION NAME REQUEST Contribution RECOMMEND RECOMMEND City of Pasco-Community 1 &Economic Development Program Administration $110.000.00 S0.00 $110.000.00 $110,000.00 City of Pasco- Administrative& Civic Center-Youth 2 Community Services Recreation Specialist S37.500.00 $43.500.00 S30,000.00 $30,000.00 City of Pasco- Martin Luther King Administrative& Community Center 3 Community Services Recreation Specialist $37.500.00 $96.500.00 S30,000.00 $30,000.00 City of Pasco- Administrative& Senior Citizen's Center 4 C Services Recreation Specialist S37.500.00 5200.000.00 520,000.00 $20.000.00 Pasco Downtown Pasco Downtown Development Association- Development Commercial 5 S Kitchen S65.000.00 $34,000.00 565,000.00 $65,000.00 City of Pasco-Community Downtown Facade 6 &Economic Development Improvement 4 facades) $80.000.00 $20.00000 S80,000.00 S80.000.00 Catholic Family&Child Catholic Family Volunteer 7 Services-Pasco Chore Services 4 $4.000.00 S117,614.00 S4,000.00 $4,000.00 Benton Franklin CAC- Energy Efficient Home 8 Home Energy Pro ram 10 households S20.000.00 S20.000.00 520.000.00 $20.000.00 Habitat for Humanity Tierra Tri-County Partners. Vida Project Support(12 9 Habitat for Humanity Homes) S32.184.00 $1,152.000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Boys&Girls Club of Program Space Benton&Franklin Expansion,Safety 10 Counties Enhancement S50.000.00 $5.000.00 S%000.00 S50.000.00 City of Pasco- Martin Luther King Administrative& Community Center-South 11 C Services End Gym Remodel S100.000.00 S0.00 S100.000.00 5100,000.00 City of Pasco-Inspection 12 Services Code Enforcement Officer S48.000.00 S17.025.00 $48.000.00 1 548.000.00 City of Pasco-Public 13 Works Sidewalks-East Pasco S300,000.00 $1,500.000.00 $294.175.00 S294,175.00 S921.684.00 $3,205.639.00 $851.175.00 5851.175.00 FY 2009 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000 2009 Program Income(Estimated) $ 10,000 Reallocations $ 266,175 Total Funds Available $ 876,175 Proposals Recommended $ 851,175 SURPLUS/DEFICIT 25,000.00 7/3/2008 2009 CDBG Fund Summary - July 17, 2008 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 Reallocate-Car over ACTIVITY ACTIVITY/AGENCY PY HUD FUNDING CARRY OVER REALLOCATE NAME ID City of Pasco-Public Works East Lewis Sidewalks 2004 202 $ 50,000.00 $50,000.00 East Pasco Underground City of Pasco-Public Works Powerlines 2004 213 $ 52,000.00 $52,000.00 City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Facade Economic Development Improvement(1facade) 2005 217 $ 2,939.34 $ 2,939.34 Pasco Economic Development Economic Development 2005 219 $ 100,000.00 $100.000.00 City of Pasco-Administrative &Community Services Volunteer Park Upgrade 2006 229 $ 20,311.95 $20,311.95 City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Facade Economic Development Improvement(2 facades) 2006 231 $ 40,000.00 $40,000.00 City of Pasco-Community& Economic Development Program Administration 2007 233 $ 30,693.14 $30,693.14 City of Pasco-Administrative &Community Services Public Services 2007 234 $ 2,916.67 $2,916.67 City of Pasco-Administrative &Community Services Public Services 2007 235 $ 2,916.67 $2,916.67 City of Pasco-Administrative &Community Services Public Services 2007 239 S 2 604.17 $2,604.17 City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Fagade Economic Development Improvement(2-4 fapades) 2007 238 $ 40.000.00 $40,000.00 Catholic Family Volunteer Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services Chore Services 2007 239 S 19,178.33 S 4,178.33 $ 15,000.00 Boys&Girls Center Roof Boys&Girls Club Replacement 2007 242 1 $ 24,174.52 $ 24,174.52 City of Pasco-Administrative Martin Luther King &Community Services Renovation 2007 243 $ 37,445.80 $37,445.80 $ 25,000.00 City of Pasco-Public Works Handicap Ramps 2007 244 $ 536.94 $536.94 $ 425 717.53 1 $184,543.01 $266,174.52 FY 2009 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000 2009 Program Income (Estimated) $ 10,000 Reallocations $ 266,175 Total Funds Available $ 876,175 7/3/2008 2009 CDBG Fund Summary - July 17, 2008 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 3 Public Service Cap ACTIVITY/AGENCY CDBG NonCDBG STAFF ID ACTIVITY NAME REQUEST FUNDS CARRY OVER RECOMMEND Contribution City of Pasco Administrative & Civic Center-Youth 2 Community Services Recreation Specialist $37,500.00 $42,500.00 $3,125.00 $30,000.00 City of Pasco- Martin Luther King Administrative & Community Center 3 Community Services Recreation Specialist $37,500.00 $89,200.00 $3,125.00 $30,000.00 City of Pasco- Administrative & Senior Citizen's Center 4 Community Services Recreation Specialist $37,500.00 $191,250.00 $2,416.66 $20,000.00 $112,500.00 $322.950.00 $8,666.66 $80,0 FY 2009 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000 2008 Program Income (Actual) $ 12,914 Total Funds Subject to Public Services Cap $ 612,914 Public Services Cap 15% $ 91,937 Public Services Recommended 14% $ 88,667 7/3/2008 Attachment 2 CITY OF PASCO 2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 17, 2008 1. Program Administration ($110,000) CDBG funds are requested to plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. 2. Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist ($30,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for a recreation specialist at the Youth Civic Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for youth at risk covering low-to-moderate income Census Tract (202). 3. Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist ($30,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for a recreation specialist at the Martin Luther King Community Center. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to school age children and youth in Census Tract (201). 4. Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist ($20,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for a recreation specialist to oversee and operate the program at the Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly with support services, nutrition, health and living skills support. 5. Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen ($65,000) CDBG funds are requested to continue operations of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, a certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical support to small food- related businesses,the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance, the startup businesses agree to make jobs created available to low-to-moderate income persons in Pasco (Census Tract 202). 6. Downtown Facade Improvement (4 facades) ($80,000) CDBG funds are requested to support businesses to continue downtown fagade improvements, with four new projects anticipated for 2009 (Census Tract 202). 1 7/11/2008 Attachment 2 CITY OF PASCO 2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 17, 2008 7. Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services (1) ($4,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide minor household repairs and wheelchair ramps for very low to low income households. This population includes elderly and disabled individuals. This year a roof repair program will be added to Volunteer Chore Services activities (City-wide). 8. Energy Efficient Home Program (10 households) ($20,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide 10 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy efficiency standards improvements (City-wide). 10. Boys & Girls Club - Program Space Expansion, Safety Enhancement ($50,000) CDBG funds are requested to renovate the stage and lighting in the gym to replace 50- year old equipment with modern lighting providing brighter, safer, and more energy efficient lighting for increased programming to meet the needs of 5-year olds. 11. Martin Luther King Community Center- South End Gym Remodel ($100,000) CDBG funds are requested to renovate 1,700 sq ft of unusable space in the gym wing at the Martin Luther King Center. Renovation will allow for additional space for expanded programs for low-to-moderate income children and youth. The remodel will convert five small rooms to three more functional rooms, providing programmable space for supervised recreation for low-moderate income persons who have been underserved because of restricted facilities. The expanded program area will be designated for a computer lab/homework area. 12. Code Enforcement Officer ($48,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide for a code enforcement officer to help improve neighborhood appearance and for compliance with rules and regulations dealing with homeowner needs in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204). 13. Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Sidewalks—Phase I ($294,175) CDBG funds are requested to provide sidewalks in the Kurtzman Park neighborhood area to create a safe route to school for neighborhood children (Census Tract 201). 2 7/11/2008 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 3, 2008 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Angela Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Community& Economic Development SUBJECT: Program Year 2008 Annual Action Plan- Amendment The city annually receives an entitlement of funds from HUD and budgets those funds according to program rules and community needs. This process is formalized in the issuance and approval of the Annual Action Plan. In program year 2008, staff prepared the Annual Action Plan for activities totaling $755,656 based on an estimated grant award. The entitlement award was less than anticipated required an adjustment to the public services activities in 2008 to comply with regulatory limits. Since the adoption of the 2008 Annual Action Plan, community needs have also changed creating the need for a revision. Attached for your review and recommendation is the draft Resolution and Exhibit A, reallocating certain funds and creating new activities to meet changing community needs. All proposed activities are eligible and meet the national objective of primarily benefiting low- moderate income persons in Pasco. Therefore, staff is recommending the following motion: Motion: I move that the proposed Resolution and Exhibit A, amending the 2008 Annual Action Plan be recommended to City Council for action. /arp Attachments: 1) Proposed Fund Summary for 2008 Annual Action Plan Reallocations 2) Proposed Project Summary for 2008 Annual Action Plan Reallocations 3) Proposed Resolution and Exhibit A 2008 CDBG Fund Summary - July 17, 2008 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 1 Real locate-Carryover ACTIVITY/AGENCY HUD FU REALLOCATE Reallocate ACTIVITY NAME I'Y ID FUNDING CARRY OVER 2009 2008 City of Pasco-Public Works East Lewis Sidewalks 2004 202 $ 50 000.00 $50,000.00 East Pasco Underground City of Pasco-Public Works Powerlines 2004 213 $ 52,000.00 $52,000.00 City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Fagade Economic Development Improvement 1fa ade 2005 217 $ 2,939.34 S 2,939.34 Pasco Economic Development Economic Development 2005 1219 $ 100 000.00 $100,000.00 City of Pasco-Administrative & Community Services Volunteer Park Upgrade 2006 229 $ 20,311.95 $20,311.95 $20,311.95 City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Fagade Economic Development Improvement 2 facades) 2006 1231 $ 40,000.00 $40,000.00 City of Pasco-Community& Economic Development Program Administration 2007 233 $ 30,693.14 $30,693.14 $30,693.14 City of Pasco-Administrative & Community Services Public Services 2007 234 $ 2,916.67 $2,916.67 City of Pasco-Administrative & Community Services Public Services 2007 235 $ 2,916.67 $2,916.67 City of Pasco-Administrative & Community Services Public Services 2007 239 $ 2,604.17 $2,604.17 City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Facade Economic Development Improvement 2-4 fa ades 2007 238 $ 40,000.00 $40,000.00 Catholic Family Volunteer Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services Chore Services 2007 239 $ 19,178.33 $ 4,178.33 $ 15,000.00 Boys& Girls Center Roof Boys& Girls Club Replacement 2007 242 S 24,174.52 S 24 174.52 City of Pasco-Administrative Martin Luther King & Community Services Renovation 2007 243 $ 37 445.80 $37,445.80 $ 25,000.00 $12,445.80 City of Pasco-Public Works Handicap Ramps 2007 244 $ 536.94 $536.94 $536.94 $ 425,717.53 $184,543.01 $266,174.52 $63,987.83 FY 2009 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000 2009 Program Income (Estimated) $ 10,000 Reallocations $ 266,175 Total Funds Available $ 876,175 $ 63,988 7/3/2008 2008 CDBG Fund Summary -July 17, 2008 Attachment 1 Planning Commission Meeting Page 2 2008 Annual Plan Amendment 1 Local ID Activity Resolution No. 3042 This Resolution Net Change 1. CDBG Program Administration $105,000.00 $105,000.00 $0.00 2. Youth Civic Center-Recreation Specialist 33,000 33,000 $0.00 3. Martin Luther King Community Center-Recreation Specialist 33,000 33,000 $0.00 4. Senior Center-Recreation Specialist[11 27,500 20,000 ($7,500.00) 5. PDDA-Commercial Kitchen 50,000 50,000 $0.00 6. Downtown Facade Improvement 2,000 2,000 $0.00 7. Catholic Family-Volunteer Chore Services 4,000 4,000 $0.00 8. Energy Efficient Healthy House Program 20,000 20,000 $0.00 9. Code Enforcement Officer 48,000 48,000 $0.00 10. Tri-County Habitat for Humanity 0 0 $0.00 H. Boys&Girls Club-Games Room Renovation 140,000 140,000 $0.00 12. Martin Luther King-Drainage Improvements 50,000 50,000 $0.00 13. Peanuts Park-ADA Restroom Upgrade[21 83,156 43,156 ($40,000.00) 14. Volunteer Park-ADA Trails& Parking Lot Upgrade[31 160,000 120,000 ($40,000.00) 15. CHIP Rehab-Minor Repairs Program[41 37,500 $37,500.00 16. LID Assistance Program-ULID#143(51 50,000 $50,000.00 17. Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Sidewalks. Planning Phase 1 40,000 $40,000.00 TOTAL, $755,656.00 $795,656.00 $40,000.00 LI Public Service Project: Reduced by$7,500 for Public Service Cap compliance due to reduced funding level. [21 Public Facility Project: Reduced by$40,000 from $83,156 to$43.156 due to reduction in cost estimate. [31 Public Facility Project: Reduced by $40.000 from $160.000 to $120.000 for reallocation to Public Facility LID Assistance Program. [41 Housing Rehabilitation: New project funded at$27,500 for minor repairs from CHIP Program. [51 Public Facility Project: New project funded at$50,000 to pay special assessment for low-income households. [61 Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Sidewalks Planning Phase l: New Project funded at$45,000 to pay preliminary design costs. 7/3/2008 Attachment 2 CITY OF PASCO 2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 17,2008 1. Protwam Administration ($110,000) CDBG funds are requested to plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. 2. Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist($30,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Youth Civic Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for youth at risk covering low-to-moderate income Census Tract(202). 3. Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist($30,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Martin Luther King. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to school age children and youth in Census Tract (201). 4. Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist($20,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly with support services, nutrition, health and living skills support. 5. Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen ($65,000) CDBG funds are requested to continue operations of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, a certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical support to small food- related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance, the startup businesses agree to make jobs created available to low-to-moderate income persons in Pasco (Census Tract 202). 6. Downtown Facade Improvement (4 facades) ($80,000) CDBG funds are requested to support business to continue downtown fagade improvements, for four new projects are anticipated for 2009 (Census Tract 202). 7. Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services (1) ($4,000) CDBG funds are requested to provide minor household repairs and wheelchair ramps for very low to low income households. This population includes elderly and disabled. This year a roof repair program will be added to Volunteer Chore Services activities (City- wide). 1 7/3/2008 CITY OF PASCO 2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 - APPROVAL SUMMARY 8. Energy Efficient Home Program (10 households) ($20,000) Provide 10 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards improvements (City-wide). 9. Code Enforcement Officer($48,000) CDBG funds are used to provide for a code enforcement officer to help improve neighborhood appearance and for compliance with rules and regulations dealing with homeowner needs in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204). 10. Tri-County Habitat for Humanity (Not funded) 11. Boys & Girls Club- Mainbranch Gamesroom Renovation ($140,000) Interior renovation project of main branch facility games room. Eliminate 1,000 square feet of hallway space in which youth are currently unsupervised. Increased games room size will allow for increased recreational and educational program opportunites (Census Tract 204). 12. Martin Luther King Community Center- Drainage Improvements ($50,000) Storm water flooding damages facility and renders part unusable at times. Installation of storm water drainage system around building will protect facility to avoid interruption of services provided to low-moderate income persons (Census Tract 201). 13. Peanuts Park Restroom Upgrade ($43,156) Replace restroom facility in Peanuts park with code compliant and ADA acessible facility (Census Tract 201 and 202). 14. Volunteer Park- Restroom, Accessibility Upgrades ($120,000) Extend pathway for enhanced accessibility, construct picnic pavilions resurface deteriorating parking lot (Census Tract 202). 2 CITY OF PASCO 2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AMENDMENT 1 - APPROVAL SUMMARY 15. CHIP Minor Rehab Prop-ram (4 households) ($37,500) Provide 4 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards improvements (Census Tract 202). 16. LID Assistance($50,000) Provide funding to pay special assessment for ULID #143 for low-income households. 17. East Lewis Sidewalks Planning($40,000) Provide funding for planning and design for east Lewis Sidewalks project (Kurtzman Park)—Phase I in 2009-2010. 3 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION amending the Program Year 2008 Community Development Block Grant Allocations and Annual Work Plan. WHEREAS, The City annually receives an entitlement of funds from HUD and budgets those funds according to program rules and community needs; and WHEREAS, staff has previously prepared the Program Year 2008 Annual Action Plan for activities totaling $755,656 based on an estimated grant award; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the 2008 Annual Action Plan community needs have changed creating the need for a revision; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed revision as shown in Exhibit"A"attached hereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Pasco City Council hereby amends the Community Development Block Grant Annual Work Plan for the 2008 program year is hereby revised as indicated in the Exhibit"A"attached hereto: PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2008. Joyce Olson Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sandy L. Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr Deputy City Clerk City Attorney U 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ ^ O O O O c 0 0 O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O O C O O O C O 0 6 O O U 69 69 69 C 69 69 69 409 6A 69 69 64 O C 0 O O O CD a �n C 0 � 0 O O z M W) lzr � 69 6f? 69 69 69 69 ca c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O vn O O O O O O p O ri M O O N � O 00 O O M O [— O O V1 a> N O M M N 47 N IT kn N M k!1 d I'D �' O V) > O ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O t!1 O O W 6 O O �n O O O O O O O � O c c Q O cri M t- O N lzt O 00 O O ri 0 v1 n O s () O O M M N N lzT V) 00 \10 �, 3 •� 69 69 .� ._ o � o CA L = C a 0 .0 0. L Q O O c N ep+ ` y C cNii U W 5 ta Q .. M m v O y U b�,q es C n a3i rn 4- >~ 0. cd C/) �+ V ; v O O m Z • Cd it fy. N 'c y vn O 40- O ry ci cts Cd p O o a `—' oo W) o a Uj c� .a H 60!) `ys o p UM c 6 M 7i o ' G 'a as p ..� = � U � •� � OQ ••• i°_ � 3 p c� ci✓ is is c Cd Cis Q O a`i O o °o a°i a. o C� O `n x Q. O -� C7 (� ° � a C Q 3 U o O R3 w I I E „ c 0 U c� � U a� Lc. 'v x x a, ,� a z Z OCz i.a X C CO L .. .. .. c }; .fl s. > = ., U G4 w �' a. v v o c a U 5) I v W o a api a�i c �.� o 'o o 'o ' d 0 u c a` = a z 0 c to o c o o z 2 O " _ a cn Gs. Q U W U F- W a. > U :G H 'eu N M 4kr; \�O t� 00 O ,-- N M 4 v7 \�6 r— Q u y Q