Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.01.17 Council Meeting Packet AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. January 17,2012 Please note that our Council meeting will take place on Tuesday,January 17 as City Hall will be closed Monday,January 16 in honor of Martin Luther King Jr. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance 3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion(in the form Iisted below). There will be no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Councilmembers or the public, the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately. (a) Approval of Minutes: 1. Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated December 19, 2011. 2. Minutes of the Special Pasco City Council Meeting dated January 9, 2012. (b) Bills and Communications: (A detailed listing of claims is available for review in the Finance Manager's office.) 1. To approve General Claims in the amount of $995,974.88 ($89,594.92 in the torm of Electronic Fund Transfer Nos. 8470 and 8598; and$906,379.96 in the form of Wire Transfer Nos. 1152, 1153, 1156 through 1162; and Claim Warrants numbered 185623 through 185776). (2011 EXPENSES) 2. To approve General Claims in the amount of$434,333.14 ($434,333.14 in the form of Claim Warrants numbered 185809 through 185963). (2011 EXPENSES) 3. To approve General Claims in the amount of $522,508.67 ($161,596.80 in the form of Electronic Fund Transfer Nos. 8682, 8684, 8707, 8708, 8709 and 8757; and $360,9I t.87 in the form of Wire Transfer Nos. 1165 through 1168; and Claim Warrants numbered 185777 through 185808 and 185964 through 186009). (2012 EXPENSES) 4. To approve Payroll Claims in the amount of $3,232,224.23, Voucher Nos. 43622 through 43706 and 80100 through 80109; and EFT Deposit Nos. 30048765 through 30049599. 5. To approve bad debt write-offs for utility billing, ambulance, cemetery, general accounts, miscellaneous accounts, and Municipal Court (non-criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of$239,674.30 and, of that amount, authorize $164,282.96 be turned over for collection. (c) Comprehensive Sewer Plan Community Resource Team Formation: I. Agenda Report from Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director dated January 5,2012. To approve the formation of a Community Resource Team to provide input on the development of the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan. (d) Estate Fence Committee Recommendations: 1. Agenda Report from Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager dated January 4,2012. 2. Draft Letter. To accept the recommendations of the Estate Fence Committee and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the proposed letter to property owners. *(e) Final Plat(MF##FP 2011-005)First Place,Phase 3 (Craig Angelo): 1. Agenda Report from David I.McDonald,City Planner dated January 11, 2012. 2. Overview Map. 3. Vicinity Map. 4. Final Plat (Council packets only; copy available for public review in the Planning office, the Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at http:/,www.pAsco-wi4.gov/gi ncil a rts). To approve the final plat for First Place, Phase 3. Regular Meeting 2 January 17,2012 *(f) Final Plat(MF#FP2011-011) Northwest Commons PUD Phase 5 (Emerald Properties): 1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald,City Planner dated January 11, 2012. 2. Overview Map. 3. Vicinity Map. 4. Final Plat (Council packets only; Copy available for public review in the Planning office, the Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at httR://www.pasco-wu—ox/ To approve the Final Plat for Northwest Commons PUD,Phase 5- *(g) Resolution No. 3365, a Resolution fixing the time and date for a public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion of South Maitland Avenue and East"C"Street. 1. Agenda Report from David I_McDonald,City Planner Dated January 11, 2012. 2. Overview Map. 3. Vicinity Map. 4_ Proposed Resolution. 5. Vacation Petition. To approve Resolution No. 3365, setting 7:00 pm, Tuesday, February 21, 2012 as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of Maitland Avenue and a portion of"C" Street. *(b) Resolution No. 3366, a Resolution fixing the time and date for a public hearing to consider the vacation of a portion of Pueblo Street, Superior Street, Nevada Avenue, Wyoming Avenue and Utah Avenue. 1. Agenda Report from David 1. McDonald, City Planner dated January 11, 2012. 2. Overview Map. 3. Vicinity Map. 4. Proposed Resolution. 5. Property Owner Letter. 6. Letter to the Shriners. To approve Resolution No. 3366, setting 7:00 pm, Tuesday, February 21, 2012 as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of Pueblo Street, Superior Street, Utah Avenue,Nevada Avenue and Wyoming Avenue. tRC) MOTION: I:5kwve to approve the Consent Agenda as read. 4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: (a) (b) (c) 5. VISITORS-OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: (a) (b) (c) 6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: (a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers (b) (c) 7. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO: (None) 8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS: (a) Ordinance No. , an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, amending Pasco Municipal Code Sections 3.07.190 Stormwater Utility charges. 1. Agenda Report from Dunyele Mason,Finance Manager dated January 3, 2012. 2. Proposed Ordinance. 3. Stormwater Fund Analysis. MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. adjusting Che stormwater utility rates effective February 1, 2012 and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Regular Meeting 3 January 17, 2012 (b) Resolution No. , a Resolution fixing the time and date for a public hearing to consider the installation of sidewalks on Hugo Avenue through Pasco Municipal Code Section 12.08. 1. Agenda Report from Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director dated January 11, 2012. 2. Proposed Resolution. 3. Right-of-Way Inventory Map. 4. City Engineer's Determination. MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. setting 7:00 pm. Monday, February 6,2012 w, 1he tinic and date to conduct a hearing to consider sidcv;alk installation on 1°Iugo Avenue between AlIon and Luxvis SIrcet%-. (c) Resolution No. , a Resolution revising City policy on required street improvements on Oregon Avenue. 1. Agenda Report from Stan Strebel,Deputy City Manager dated January 3, 2012. 2. Resolution No. 2337. 3. Ordinance No. 3255. 4. Proposed Resolution. MOTION- I move to approve Resolution No _- - revising City policy on required street improvements on Oregon Avenuc. (d) Resolution No. , a Resolution endorsing a Regional Emergency Communications System and urging the governing bodies of public safety agencies within Franklin County to implement such a system in calendar year 2012. 1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield,City Manager dated January 3, 2012. 2. e-Gov Study(provided previously to City Council via email, copy available for public review on the city's webpage at li!ILl www.oasco-wa.gov/eitvcouncilreports). 3. Memo from Fire Chief. 4. Memo from Chief of Police. 5. Letter from Police Officers Association. 6. Cost Allocation Comparison, 7. Proposed Resolution. MOTION: 1 move to approve ResnlLati[at No- endorsing at regional el"erg;ency communic:alions;system and urging the public safety agencies with Franklin Cotinly to implunlent such a system in eslendar year 2412. (e) Resolution No. , a Resolution confirming Mayoral appointments of Councilmembers to various Boards and Committees. 1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated January 9, 2012. 2. Resolution, 3. Proposed list of Board and Committee Assignments for 2012-2013. MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.,, confirming Mayoral nppnintmimts to various Boards and Committees. 9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: (None) 10. NEW BUSINESS: (a) Public Safety Sales Tax Measure: 1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated January 6, 2012. 2. Franklin County Resolution No. 2011-281, 3. Memorandum from Police Chief. 4. Tentative Allocation Schedule. MOTION: l movc to authorize three additional police officer positioms and one additional sergeant position to form the Street Primes Unit. -AND- MOTION: 1 move to authorize four additional police sergeant positions dependent oil elimination of one police captain position and three corporal positions. *(b) Turbine Blowers for WWTP Optimization Improvements Project: 1. Agenda Report from Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director dated January 11,2012. 2. Proposal. (RC) MOTION: 1 move to iwnrd the low bid for the purchase of turbine howers for the Waste"later 'l matment Plant (W WTP) Optimi7�-#ion Improvement& Project No. (`3-10-51-SWR to Sulzer/ABS in the amount of$272,910.59 including sales tax md. farther, authorize the Mayor to sig,ra 1hv(:ontroct documents- Regular Meeting 4 January 17,2012 11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: (a) (b) (c) 12. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (a) (b) (c) 13. ADJOURNMENT. (RC) Roll Call Vote Required Item not previously discussed MF# "Master File #...." Q Quasi-Judicial Matter REMINDERS: L 3:30 p.m., Thursday, January 19, Franklin County Emergency Management Office — Franklin County Emergency Management Board Meeting. (MAYOR MATT WATKINS, Rep., COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN,Alt.) 2. 11:30 a.m,, Friday, January 20, Sandberg Event Center—Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Board Meeting, (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.) MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL. DECEMBER 19, 201 1 CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Rebecca Francik, Mike Garrison, Robert Hoffmann, Tom Larsen, Saul Martinez, Matt Watkins and Al Yenney. Staff present: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager; Leland Kerr, City Attorney; Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager; Richard Terway, Administrative & Community Services Director; Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director; Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director; Bob Metzger, Police Chief; Bob Gear, Fire Chief and Dunyele Mason, Financial Services Manager. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. Debbie Clark, City Clerk, administered the Oath of Office to Councilmembers Al Yenney (District 1), Saul Martinez (District 4), Rebecca Francik (District 5) and Matt Watkins (At-Large, Position 6). CONSENT AGENDA: (a) Approval of Minutes: Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated December 5, 2011. (b) Bills and Communications: To approve General Claims in the amount of$1,895,863,86 ($245,206.09 in the form of Electronic Fund Transfer Nos. 8170, 8219, 8220, 8232, 8290 and 8365; and $1,650,657.77 in the form of Wire Transfer Nos. 1151, 1154 through 1155; and Claim Warrants numbered 185382 through 185622). To approve bad debt write-offs for utility billing, ambulance, cemetery, general accounts, miscellaneous accounts, and Municipal Court (non-criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of 5198,674.32 and, of that amount, authorize $130,237.85 be turned over for collection. (e) Cancellation of Workshop Meeting. To cancel the December 26, 2011 Workshop Meeting. (d) Cancellation of Regular Meeting. To cancel the January 2, 2012 Regular Meeting. (e) Schedule a Special Meeting. To schedule a special meeting on January 9, 2012 to select Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tem through 2013. (f) Golf Course Management Agreement: To approve the Management Agreement with CourseCo Inc., for management of Sun Willows Golf Course and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the Agreement. (g) Final Plat (MF 4FP2011-010) West Pasco Terrace Phase 3 (Olin Homes): To approve the Final Plat for West Pasco Terrace, Phase 3. 1 3(a).1 MINUTES REGULAR MEEhING PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2011 (h) Downtown Pasco Development Authority Agreements: To approve the lease agreement with the Downtown Pasco Development Authority for business office space located at 401 W. Lewis Street and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. To approve the lease agreement with the Downtown Pasco Development Authority for operation of the Commercial Kitchen Business Incubator located at 110 South Fourth Avenue and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. To approve the lease agreement with the Downtown Pasco Development Authority for operation of the Farmers Market located at S. 4th Avenue and W. Columbia Street and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. To approve the funding agreement with the Downtown Pasco Development Authority and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. (i) Resolution No. 3361, a Resolution of the City of Pasco, Washington accepting and adopting the 2011 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. To approve Resolution No. 336I, adopting the 2011 updates to Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management PIan. Removed from Consent Agenda and moved to Item 8(h). 0) Resolution No. 3362, a Resolution of the City of Pasco, Washington accepting and adopting the Franklin County Hazard Mitigation Plan. To approve Resolution No. 3362, adopting the 2011 update of the Franklin County Emergency Management Hazard Mitigation Plan. Removed from Consent Agenda and moved to Item 8(i). MOTION: Ms, Francik moved to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Mayor Watkins presented a Proclamation to Pasco Chamber of Commerce President, Carrie Chambers and Executive Director, Colin Hastings, proclaiming January 2-6, 2012, "Agriculture Week." Mr. Hastings invited all to the Pasco Real Ag Show on January 3 &4, 2012 at TRAC. VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS: Jesse Walsh, 208 W. Jadwin, Richland, inquired about zoning regulations for tattoo businesses. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS: Mr. Garrison reported on the Tri-Cities Visitor and Convention Bureau Board meeting. Mr. Yenney attended the Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Committee meeting and commented on the importance of the agricultural industry in Pasco. Mr. Martinez, Ms. Francik and Mr. Watkins reported on the Tri-Citics Regional Public Facilities District meeting. Mr, Hoffmann reported on the Good Roads & Transportation Association meeting. 2 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 201 1 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO: Mr. White explained the details of the proposed vacation. Street Vacation (NIF#VAC 2011-007) Portions of Bonneville Street, Clark Street and Main Avenue. MAYOR WATKINS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED VACATION. FOLLOWING THREE CALLS FOR COMMENTS, EITHER FOR OR AGAINST, AND THERE BEING NONE, MAYOR WATKINS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. Ordinance No. 4031, an Ordinance vacating a portion of East Bonneville Street, East Clark Street and North Main Avenue. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No: 4031, vacating a portion of Bonneville Street, a portion of Clark Street and a portion of North Main Avenue and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 2011 Budget Supplement. Mr. Crutchfield explained the details of the budget supplements. MAYOR WATKINS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED BUDGET SUPPLEMENTS. FOLLOWING THREE CALLS FOR COMMENTS, EITHER FOR OR AGAINST,AND THERE BEING NONE,MAYOR WATKINS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. Ordinance No. 4032, an Ordinance amending the 2011 Annual Operating Budget of the City of Pasco by providing supplement thereto; by appropriating revenue received in excess of estimated revenues for the current year and by providing transfers and adjustment authority. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4032, amending the 2011 Operating Budget by providing a revenue supplement of$11,933,597 and an expenditure supplement thereto in the amount of$14,680,287 and, further, to authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 4033, an Ordinance relating to Supplemental Capital Improvement Projects Budget for the Year 2411. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4033, amending the 2011 Capital Improvements Budget by providing an expenditure supplement thereto in the amount of $3,833,076 and, further, to authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 3363, a Resolution authorizing interfund loans from the General Fund to other funds. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve Resolution No. 3363, authorizing temporary interfund loans from the General Fund to the Construction Fund, the Community Development Block Grant Fund (CDBG) and the Golf Course Fund in the amount of $1,313,495 and from the Blvd Maintenance Fund to the Stadium/Convention Center Fund in the amount of$689,000 and from the Pension Fund to the I.ID Construction Fund in the amount of 589,351. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 3 MINUTES REGUI.,AR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2011 ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS: Tri-Cities Prep Street Agreements: MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve the Joint Development Agreement between Tri-Cities Prep, TapteaI II LLC and the City for development of a new street connecting St. Thomas Drive and Chapel Hill Blvd and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve the Latecomer Satisfaction Agreement with Aho Construction I and, further, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement, Mr, Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 4034, an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington Accepting a Donation of the Waiver of Latecomers Fee Valued at $331697.00. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4034, accepting a donation valued at $33,697.00 by Aho Construction and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Yenney seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 3364, a Resolution amending the 2012 Federal CDBG Allocations and Annual Work Plan. Mr. White explained the details of the CDBG Allocations. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve Resolution No. 3364, amending the 2012 CDBG Allocations and Annual Work Plan. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 4035, an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, relating to City street improvements; ordering the improvement of South Cedar and South Hugo Avenues and East Alton Street to City street standards, all in accordance with Resolution No. 3348 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 149, and ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvements; providing that payment for the improvements be made by special assessments upon the property in the District, payable by the mode of`payment by bonds"; and providing for the issuance and sale of Local Improvement District warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and Local Improvement District bonds. Council and staff discussed the details of the proposed LID. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4035, creating LID 149 for the improvement of Hugo and the west side of Cedar Avenues and Alton Street and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr, Martinez seconded. Motion carried 6 -1. No —Larsen. Code Amendment Rabbits and Hens in Residential Zones (MF#CA2011-005): Council and staff discussed the proposed Code Amendment. MOTION FOR FINDINGS: Ms. Francik moved to adopt the Findings as contained in the staff memo to the Planning Commission dated November 17, 2011. Mr. Yenney seconded. Motion carried 6 -1. No — Garrison. Ordinance No. 4036, an Ordinance relating to zoning and amending PMC Title 25 dealing with rabbits and chicken hens in residential zoning districts. MOTION: Mr. Yenney moved to adopt Alternative Ordinance No. 4036, amending PMC Chapters 25.20, 25.22, 25.24, 25.26, 25.28, 25.30, 25.32, 25.34, 25.36 and 25.38 to allow for the keeping of rabbits and chicken hens in residential zones and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Larsen seconded. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2011 MOTION: Mr. Hoffmann moved to amend the ordinance changing the setbacks to 5 feet next to alleyways. Mr. Larsen seconded. Motion failed 0— 7. Original Motion carried 4—3. No — Martinez, Watkins, Garrison. Council instructed staff to prepare an amendment to this ordinance requiring 5 foot setbacks next to alleyways for consideration at next regular meeting. 2012 Annual Operating and Capital Projects Budgets: Ordinance No. 4028, an Ordinance adopting the City of Pasco Operating Budget for the Year 2012. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4028, adopting the 2012 .Annual Operating Budget and, further, to authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried 6 -1. No — Hoffmann. Ordinance No. 4029, an Ordinance adopting the City of Pasco Capital Projects Budget for the Year 2012. Mr. John Clapper, 4702 Mojave Ln., suggested the cement barrier be removed from Rodeo Dr. at Road 68. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4029, adopting the 2012 Capital Projects Budget and further, to authorize publication by sununary only. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried 5 —2. No— Larson, Hoffmann. Ordinance No. 4037, an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, amending Title 13 of the Pasco Municipal Code regarding irrigation water utility rules and regulations. Mr. Strebel explained the details of the proposed ordinance. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4037,regarding irrigation water utility rules and regulations and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Ordinance No. 4038, an Ordinance concerning wages for temporary non- management, non-represented personnel for the calendar year 2012. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to adopt Ordinance No. 4038, revising the Temporary Employee Wage Plan for calendar year 2012 and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No.3361, a Resolution of the City of Pasco, Washington accepting and adopting the 2011 Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. Council and staff discussed the details of the proposed plan. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve Resolution No. 3361, adopting the 201 1 updates to Franklin County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously. Resolution No. 3362, a Resolution of the City of Pasco, Washington accepting and adopting the Franklin County Hazard Mitigation Plan. MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve Resolution No. 3362, adopting the 2011 update of the Franklin County Emergency Management Hazard Mitigation Plan. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 5 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2011 UNFINISHED BUSINESS: Wastewater Treatment Plant Optimization Improvements Project, #C3-10-51- SWR: Mr. Keith Larson, 3903 W. 36`x' Kennewick, President of Williams, Charles, West, explained to Council why he believes Williams, Charles, West's bid should not have been disqualified. Council and staff discussed the bidding process. MOTION: Ms, Francik moved to award the low bid for the Pasco Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project, #C3-10-51-SWR to Apollo, Inc., in the amount of $1,021,919.88 including sales tax and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the contract documents, Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: Yes — Watkins, Yenney, Francik, Garrison, Hoffmann, Martinez. No —Larsen. Council asked staff to review the City's hidding process to see if any clarifications are necessary. NEW BUSINESS: Columbia Water Supply— Raw Water Intake Irrigation Pipeline: MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve the Professional Services Agreement with Murray, Smith and Associates, Inc., authorizing professional services with respect to the Columbia Water Supply—Raw Water Intake irrigation Pipeline, not to exceed $609,814.00 and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Mr. Garrison seconded, Motion carried unanimously. Process Water Treatment System Optimization: MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to approve the Professional Services Agreement with CES authorizing professional services with respect to the Comprehensive Sewer Plan, not to exceed $318,600 and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried 6-0. Mr. Garrison was absent from the Council Chambers. Mr. Garrison returned to the Council Chambers. 4th Avenue Corridor Project (South Segment) TIB Grant: MOTION: Ms. Francik moved to accept the grant offered by TIB in the amount of $700,000 for the 4th .Avenue Corridor Improvements (South) Project and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Mr. Martinez seconded. Motion carried 5-2. No— Hoffmann, Larsen. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION: Mr. Strebel explained the details of recent Public Records Requests. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Council adjourned to Executive Session at 9:16 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes to discuss litigation or potential litigation with the City Manager and the City Attorney. Mayor Watkins called the meeting back to order at 9:36 p,m. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business,the meeting was adjourned at 9:36 p.m. 6 MINUTES REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 19, 2011 APPROVED: ATTEST: Matt Watkins, Mayor Debra L. Clark, City Clerk PASSED and APPROVED this 17`h day of January, 2012. 7 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL. JANUARY 9, 2012 CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Matt Watkins, Mayor, ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Rebecca Francik, Michael Garrison, Robert Hoffmann, Tom Larsen, Saul Martinez, Matt Watkins and Al Yenney. Staff present: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager; Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney; Stan Strebel, Deputy City Manager; Richard Terway, Administrative & Community Services Director; Rick White, Community& Economic Development Director; Ahmad Qayoumi, Public Works Director; Bob Metzger, Police Chief and Bob Gear, Fire Chief. The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. Election of:Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tern: Mr. Yenney nominated Matt Watkins for Mayor. With no further nominations, Mayor Watkins closed nominations. Mr. Watkins was declared Mayor for the years 2012 and 2013 by unanimous voice vote. Mr. Martinez nominated Rebecca Francik for Mayor Pro-Tem. Mr. Larsen nominated Robert Hoffmann for Mayor Pro-Tem. With no further nominations, Mayor Watkins closed nominations. Mr. Hoffmann declined the nomination for Mayor Pro-Tern. Ms. Francik was declared Mayor Pro-Tem by unanimous voice vote. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:05 p.m. APPROVED: ATTEST: Matt Watkins, Mayor Debra L. Clark, City Clerk PASSED and APPROVED this 17`' day of January, 2012. 1 3(a).2 CITY OF PASCO Council Meeting of: January 3,2012 Accounts Payable Approved The City Courcil City of Pasco,Franklin County,Washington We ic s ren undersigred,do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished,the rvdered or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is a just,due and unpaid bligaUon against th t and that we are authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. ,I Gary Crutch f Id, City Mana DUrTTele Mas , Finance Services Manager We,the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County,Washington, do hereby certify on this 3rd day of January.2012 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received: Check Numbers and 185623- 185776 In The Amount Of: $906,379.96 Electronic Funds Transfers: 1152, 1153. 1156, 1157. 1158, 1159. 1160, 1161, 1162 In The Amount Of: $89,594.92 Electronic Funds Transfers: 8470, 8598 (Journal Entries) Combined total of $995,974.88 Councilmember Councilmember SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERAL FUND: Legislative 240.00 Judicial 3,555.38 Executive 4,654.94 Police 14,140.65 Fire 8,946.40 Administration&Community Services 39,438.57 Community Development 3,520.45 Engineering 4,349.18 Non-Departmental 68,780.44 Library 1,226.98 TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 148,853.00 STREET 16,755.85 ARTERIAL STREET 1,599.25 STREET OVERLAY 0.00 C. D. BLOCK GRANT 105,265.10 KING COMMUNITY CENTER 1,424.17 AMBULANCE SERVICE 5,310.04 CEMETERY 3,627.88 ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 10,334.64 GOLF COURSE 54,170.80 SENIOR CENTER OPERATING 2,730.93 MULTI MODAL FACILITY 1.355.57 RIVERSHORE TRAIL&MARINA MAIN 0.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMNT LODGING 13,788.64 LITTER CONTROL 1,399.67 REVOLVING ABATEMENT 458.85 TRAC DEVELOPMENT& OPERATING 0.00 PARKS 0.00 STADlUM1CONVENTION CENTER 8,687.84 GENERAL CAP PROJ CONSTRUCTION 34,821,71 WATER/SE W ER 373,973.79 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL 6,82497 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING BUSINESS 44,28 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL 0.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-REPLACEMENT BUSINESS 0.00 MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE 87,594.92 CENTRAL STORES 58.27 PAYROLL CLEARING 40,805.82 LID CONSTRUCTION 0.00 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIST 27,103.86 TRI CITY ANIMAL CONTROL 47,985.00 SENIOR CENTER ASSOCIATION 0.00 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 995,974.88 2011 EXPENSES 3(b).1 CITY OF PASCO Council Meeting of: January 17.2012 Accounts Payable Approved The City Council City of Pasco, Franklin County,Washington We, the undersigned,do hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished, the s rendered or Iabor performed as described herein and that the claim Is a just, due and unpaid obligation ins the city and that we are authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. 4:1 1 1 - zt� Gary Crutchf Id, WMan er Dunyale Mason,Fin ce Services Manager We,the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco,Franklin County,Washington,do hereby certify on this 17th day of January,2012 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received: Check Numbers and 186809 -185963 In The Amount Of: $434,333.14 Electronic Funds Transfers: In The Amount Of: $0.00 Electronic Funds Transfers: (Journal Entries) Combined total of $434,333.14 Councilmember Councilmember SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERALFUND Legislative 0.00 Judicial 10,424.87 Executive 4,244.29 Police 6,137.53 Fire 27,675.87 Administration&Community Services 75,959.58 Community Development 1,404.32 Engineering 1,056.85 Non-Departmental 16,885.80 Library 1,536.19 TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 145,325.30 STREET 42,912.20 ARTERIAL STREET 0.00 STREET OVERLAY 0.00 C. D.BLOCK GRANT 280.01 KING COMMUNITY CENTER 2,693.20 AMBULANCE SERVICE 4,453.84 CEMETERY 169.48 ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 5,396.67 GOLF COURSE 0.00 SENIOR CENTER OPERATING 4,832.48 MULTI MODAL FACILITY 2,137.47 RIVERSHORE TRAIL&MARINA MAIN 95.64 SPECIAL ASSESSMNT LODGING 799.00 LITTER CONTROL 0.00 REVOLVING ABATEMENT 0.00 TRAC DEVELOPMENT&OPERATING 0.00 PARKS 0.00 STADIUMfCONVENTICN CENTER 2,546.52 GENERAL CAP PROJ CONSTRUCTION 19,202.57 WATEPJSEWER 172,351.36 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL 25,417.62 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING BUSINESS 3,603.97 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL 0.00 EQUIPMEN r RENTAL-REPLACEMENT BUSINESS 0.00 MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE 0.00 CENTRAL STORES 41.13 PAYROLL CLEARING 0.00 LID CONSTRUCTION 0.00 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIST 0.00 TRi CITY ANIMAL CONTROL 1,940.28 SENIOR CENTER ASSOCIATION 134.40 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 434,333.14 2411 EXPENSES 3(b).2 CITY OF PASCO Council Meeting of: January 17.2012 Accounts Payable Approved The City Council City of Pasco,Franklin County,Washington We,the under ' ned,do hereby cerlify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished,the services der d or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is a just,due and unpaid igati against the city and that we are authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. 6�? \41 "Figer Gary Crutchfield, Ci Man r Dunyele We, the undersign d City Counclimembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County,Washington,do hereby certify on this 17th day of January,2012 that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received: Check Numbers and 185777-185808 In The Amount OF. $360,911.87 Electronic Funds Transfers: 185964-186009 1165.1168 In The Amount 0': $161,596.80 Electronic Funds Transfers: 8682.8684,8707 (Journal Entries) 8708.8709,8757 Combined total of $522,508.67 Counclimember Councilmember SUMMARY OF CLAIMS BY FUND: GENERALFUND: Legislative 0.00 Judicial 2,203.00 Executive 224.03 Police 40,073.17 Fire 5844 Administration&Community Services 58,426.46 Community Development 323.07 Engineering 63,03 Nan-Departmental 74,290.71 Library 91,683,67 TOTAL GENERAL.FUND: 267,345.60 STREET 3.84 ARTERIAL STREET C.00 STREET OVERLAY C.00 C. D. BLOCK GRANT 6.0" HOME CONSORTIUM GRANT 5,000.00 KING COMMUNITY CENTER 88.0' AMBULANCE SERVICE 496.40 CEMETERY 6.01 ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 450.00 GOLF COURSE 32,785.79 SENIOR CENTER OPERATING 320.95 MULTI MODAL FACILITY 17.00 RIVERSHORE TRAIL&MARINA MAIN 0-00 SPECIAL ASSESSMNT LODGING 0.00 LITTER CONTROL 0.00 REVOLVING ABATEMENT 62.00 TRAC DEVELOPMENT&OPERATING 0.00 PARKS 0.00 STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER 0.00 99 UTGO BDS LtBR/FIRE ST 301.75 2002 UTGO REFUND BONDS 301.75 GENERAL CAP PROD CONSTRUCTION 0.00 WATER/SEWER 7,759.91 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING GOVERNMENTAL 12.02 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING BUSINESS 0.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-REPLACEMENT GOVERNMENTAL 0.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-REPLACEMENT BUSINESS 0.00 MEDICALIDENTAL INSURANCE 154,912.39 CENTRAL STORES 0.00 PAYROLL CLEARING 49,830,09 LID CONSTRUCTION 0.00 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIST 2,603.55 TRI CITY ANIMAL CONTROL 0.00 SENIOR CENTER ASSOCIATION 105.60 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 522,508,67 2012 EXPENSES 3(b).3 CITY OF PASCO Council Meeting of: Payroll Approval January 17, 2012 The City Council City of Pasco Franklin County,Washington The E wing is a summ of p roll claims against the City of Pasco for the month of December 11 w ich are p ented h rewith for your review and approv Gary rutch field, agar Rick TerwVy,Administratve&Comm ni y Services Director We,the undersigned City Council members of the City Council of the City of Pasco. Franklin County, Washington,do hereby certify that the services represented by the below expenditures have been received and that payroll voucher No's.43622 through 43706 and 80100 through 80109 and EFT deposit No's 300487651hrough 30049599 and City contributions in the aggregate amount of$3,232,224.23 are approved for payment on this 17th day of January 2011 Councilmember Councilmember SUMMARY OF PAYROLL BY FUND GENERAL FUND: Legislative $ 11,487.27 Judicial 119,274.34 Executive 103,775.00 Police 1,011,338.85 Fire 473,776.87 Administrative&Community Services 356,155.74 Community Development 116,423.72 Engineering 148,846.39 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 2,341,078.18 CITY STREET 58,937.80 BLOCK GRANT 18,687.47 MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER 9,027.47 AMBULANCE SERVICE FUND 272,325.29 CEMETERY 13,100.81 ATHLETIC FUND 3,058.89 SENIOR CENTER 19,808.10 STADIUM OPERATIONS 0.00 MULTI-MODAL FACILITY 0.00 BOAT BASIN 0.00 REVOLVING ABATEMENT FUND 0.00 TASK FORCE 0.00 WATER/SEWER 447,432.64 EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING 41,349.85 OLD FIRE PENSION FUND 7,417.73 GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 3,232,224.23 Payroll Summary Net Payroll 1,569,015.57 Employee Deductions 882,869.51 Gross Payroll 2,551,885.08 City of Pasco Contributions 680,33915 Total Payroll $ 3,232,224.23 3(b).4 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Coune' DATE: January 11,2012 TO: Gary Crutc fie[ 4Finan Manager REGULAR: January I7,2012 Rick Terway, A ative &Community S irector FROM: Dunyele Mason ial Servic es Manage , SUBJECT: BAD DEBT WRITE-OFF'SICOLLECTIO.N. 1. RE=FERENCE (S): Write-off and collection lists are on file in the Finance Department. 11. AQIIQN,REQUESTED OF.Ct-UNC1L/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: MOTION: I move to approve bad debt write-offs for utility billing, ambulance, cemetery, general accounts, miscellaneous accounts, and Municipal Court (non-criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts receivable in the total amount of $239,674.30 and, of that amount, authorize$164,282.96 be turned over for collection. Ill. 131STORYD FACTS BRIEF: I. UTILITY BILLING - These are all inactive accounts, 60 days or older, Direct write-offs are under SI0 with no current forwarding address, or are accounts in "occupant" status. Accounts submitted for collection exceed$10.00. 2. AMBULANCE - These are all delinquent accounts over 90 days past due or statements are returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed $10.00. Direct write off's including DSHS and Medicare customers; the law requires that the City accept assignment in these cases. 3. COURT ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE-These are all delinquent non-criminal and criminal fines, and parking violations over 30 days past due. 4. CODE ENFORCEMENT — LIENS — These are Code Enforcement violation penalties which are either un-collectable or have been assigned for collections because the property owner has not complied or paid the Fine. There are still liens in place on these amounts which will continue to be in effect until the property is brought into compliance and the debt associated with these liens are paid. 5. CEMETERY—These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements are returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed$10.00. 6. GENERAL- These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements are returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed$10.00, 7. N11SC ELLANEOUS- These are delinquent accounts over 120 days past due or statements are returned with no forwarding address. Those submitted for collection exceed$10.00. Amount Direct Referred to Total Write-offs Collection Write-offs Utility Billing $ 11.01 .00 11.01 Ambulance $ 74,77533 27,845.03 102,620.36 Court AIR 5 ,00 125,726.00 125,726.00 Code Enforcement $ 35.00 10,331.93 10,366.93 Cemetery $ .00 .00 .00 General $ 570.00 .00 570.00 Miscellaneous $ .00 380.00 380.00 TOTAL: S 75,391.34 I64,282.96 239,674.30 IV. ADMINISTRATIVE ROUTING: cc: Dot French, Municipal Court Clerk 3(b)eS AGENDA REPORT NO. 22 FOR: City Council January 5, 2012 TO: Gary Crutchfie it Manager Workshop Mtg.: 01/09/2012 Regular Mtg.: 01/17/2012 FROM: Ahmad Qayoum , is Works Director SUBJECT; Comprehensive ewer Plan Community Resource Team Formation I. REFERENCE(S): H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 01/09: Discussion 01117: MOTION: 1 move to approve the formation of a Community Resource Team to provide input on the development of the City's Comprehensive Sewer Plan. III. FISCAL IMPACT: TV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) In September 2011, the City of Pasco authorized Murray, Smith and Associates, Inc. (MSA), to assist the City in the creation of a Comprehensive Sewer Plan, The Comprehensive Sewer Plan will provide a holistic approach to addressing the City's wastewater collection and treatment needs to meet flows, loads and regulatory demands now and for the foreseeable future. B) MSA is currently working with City staff in the development of the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. The initial tasks of the Comprehensive Sewer Plan that are nearly complete are the evaluation and review of existing facilities, including development of a sewer system model, determining design capacities and assessing current facility conditions. C) Work remaining as part of the Comprehensive Sewer Plan will include evaluating alternatives to meet current and future wastewater management needs and development of the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) that will define sewer system facility recommendations, including the potential for a second wastewater treatment facility to meet the City's future needs. V. DISCUSSION: A) As part of the Comprehensive Sewer Plan work program, MSA is tasked to support the City with public involvement elements associated with the Plan. One aspect of the public involvement program is to establish a Community Resource Team (CRT), commonly referred to as an Advisory Committee. The Community Resource Team consists of local citizens representing the community, local business and other key stakeholders, selected by the City for their knowledge of community interests, their diversity of thought and access to both formal and informal stakeholders. B) The CRT is anticipated to consist of 5-7 citizen members. CRT members will not need to have any specific technical knowledge of sewer systems but should have an interest in the community and be willing to actively participate. Members will be requested to commit to a term of one year and will be required to review progress documents (e,g, technical memos). It is anticipated that the CRT will meet three to four times over the year to provide input to City staff and the consultant. C) Staff recommends solicitation of interest over the next couple of weeks with Mayoral appointments of up to seven members by the end of the month/early February, to accommodate the consultant's work schedule. 3(c) AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 4, 2012 TO: Gary Crutchfie w Manager Workshop Mtg.: 1/9/12 Regular Mtg.: 1/17/12 FROM: Stan Strebel, D puty City Manage SUBJECT: Estate Fence Committee Recommendations 1. REFERENCE(S): 1. Draft Letter 11. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/9: Discussion 1117: MOTION: 1 move to accept the recommendations of the Estate Fence Committee and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the proposed letter to property owners. 111. FISCAL IMPACT: Property Owners: anticipate approximately $7 per If City: in kind, parks crew, community service, school volunteers IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The Estate Fence Committee (consisting of Mayor Watkins, Councilmembers Francik and Yenney, as well as Joe Cruz from the Planning Commission, and Dwayne Speer from the Code Enforcement Board), appointed to consider the problem with estate fencing around some subdivisions has met a number of times since its appointment and is ready to move toward a meeting involving interested property owners. B) The Committee has concentrated on the problems associated with the fencing around Montgomery Estates (Road 100) and Loviisa Farms (Road 100, Chapel Hill Blvd and Road 84) due to a poor quality original product and graffiti issues. The fence breaks easily and has been difficult to clean from frequent graffiti. The Committee proposes to meet with adjacent property owners to discuss a possible replacement solution. The following statement (or similar) is noted on the plats for the respective subdivisions: "The City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment that is reasonable, under the circumstances, for the City to perform and coordinate the installation of new materials, if material costs are paid by property owners. Cedar slats are recommended due to availability, cost and durability. C) There are approximately 120 affected property owners with some 8,400 ft of defective fence, about 70 If per property. V. DISCUSSION: A) The attached letter has been reviewed by the committee and is ready for the Mayor's signature, assuming concurrence by the rest of the City Council. 3(d) January 17; 2012 Dear Property Owner: As I am sure you are aware, the "estate" or perimeter fencing that was originally installed by the developer in your area is proving, to be a maintenance problem. It is easily broken and several areas have been plagued with graffiti. This has led to an overall poor appearance which threatens lowered property values and encourages further damage by certain individuals. The City has recently been evaluating options for correcting this problem that will provide a stronger fence and also allow for repeated graffiti removal while restoring the fence appearance to near new conditions. The original fencing material is no longer available for purchase (and would be less than satisfactory if it were), resulting in the likelihood that, without a uniform remedy to address the problem, individual efforts to repair the fence will fall short of achieving the uniformity and pleasing appearance as required by the subdivision plat approval, and which the original fencing provided. You may be aware that the plat for the Loviisa Farms #5 Subdivision (NOTE: the language for each plat in Montgomery Estates or Loviisa Farms may vary slightly; will use appropriate language for each property) includes the following stipulation: "Common fencing shall be installed along Broadmoor Boulevard. The City may make repairs or replace the fencing as needed. Property owners adjoining said fence shall be responsible for payment of all costs associated with maintenance and upkeep." We would like to invite you to attend a neighborhood meeting to discuss how we can team with you in transitioning from the current poor fencing situation to a much more available and maintainable product thereby restoring a pleasant perimeter around your neighborhood. The meeting will be held on Wednesday, February 1 at 7:00 pm at Chiawana High School, Room 4 We hope to see you then. If you have questions prior to the meeting, please contact Stan Strebel at 543-5760. Sincerely, Matt Watkins Mayor MW/SS/tlz AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council °� January l L. 2012 TO: Gary Crutchfie anager Regular Mtg.: 1/17/12 Rick White, Community& ELnomic Development Director Zw FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT ('MF#FP 2011-005)First Place. Phase 3 (Cram Aelo) I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Overview Map 2. Vicinity Map 3. Final Plat (Council packets only; copy available for public review in the Planning office, the Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at http://wm w,pasco- wa.gov/ciTycouncilra ,orts}. II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/17: MOTION: I move to approve the final plat for First Place, Phase 3. III. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. City Council previously approved a preliminary plat for the First Place, subdivision. The developer is now seeking final plat approval for Phase 3. B. First Place subdivision is a single-family residential development located west of Road 44 and north of the FCID irrigation canal. V. DISCUSSION: A. Prior to approval of a final plat, the developer is to either install all infrastructure or post a bond or other instrument that secures the financing for the infrastructure improvements. In this case, the developer has completed most of the improvements and has provided the City with a bond in an amount sufficient ($19,218.00) to cover the costs of outstanding improvements. B. The final plat shows and contains information on primary control points, tract boundaries, dimensions, bearings, lot numbers and other necessary engineering data. In addition, the plat contains the required descriptions, dedication and acknowledgment, and approval sections. 3(e) 3 Item- Final Plat - First Place Phase N Over"'Iew Applicant: Craig Angelo Map File # : FP 2011 -009 0 .6i 47 ills gat WARM tip i7m , Ij .0 111.ji d4 r, 4L WIN MM a W 6"o Air a Air a a Sii 12 ��• �, 4'� bMtr. °r'-w,/ •• r• ,c ff - , rL nl'�r A a -wo Wz A 1026— & k* @F, I W42 *tit -Ilk a ORPOWIR Nor Map Craig Angelo Vicinity Item: Final Plat - First Place Phase 3 Applicant:File #: FP 2011 -009 + Wit- AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council .y January 11, 2012 TO: Gary Crutch' ity Manager Regular Mtg.: 1/17/12 Rick White, Community& mic Development Directo� ` r FROM: David 1. McDonald, City Planner U`^ SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT IMF# FP 2011-011): Northwest Commons PUD Phase 5 (Emet'ald Properties) I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Overview Map 2. Vicinity Map 3. Final Plat (Council packets only; copy available for public review in the Planning Office, the Pasco Library or on the City's webpage at http://www.pascQ- wa. ov/ciD-councilreports. IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/17: MOTION: I move to approve the Final Plat for Northwest Commons PUD, Phase 5. III. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. City Council previously approved a preliminary plat for the Northwest Commons development. The developer is now seeking final plat approval for Phase 5. B. The Northwest Commons subdivision is a single-family residential development located east of Road 52 and north of Sandifur Parkway. V. DISCUSSION: A. Prior to the approval of a final plat, the developer is to either install all infrastructure or post a bond or other instrument that secures the financing for the infrastructure improvements. In this case, the developer has completed the improvements. B. The final plat shows and contains information on primary control points, tract boundaries, dimensions, bearings, lot numbers and other necessary engineering data_ In addition, the plat contains the required descriptions, dedication and acknowledgment, and approval sections. 3(f) Overview Item: Final Plat - NW Commons Ph 5 Applicant: Emerald Properties N Map w s FP 2011 -011 �:���.'�� - -•ter - �`_'J[,�i J :,fir . � �� '• ' Ilia ,. � � 'j •', ,. � a � is rte, r . r _t y t, A0. te}„ ��iE_.a., JL 3 r fle�iM -, in 40 ^r!* mow. i" •` z � v�'A.Jii J -'gal « r... ..y a,r4' r iM'r ° �Rrv .t� r 11�O�ad. ey _� 3� sii T��Sol a Y fill� '� r:� 1+�� '♦ [�z�`1�`r�lww�i�`cn ;7� E! '-ra�lwi« .;�,• / •f:i♦:�•.fq.• .t ,., 's •4` ^ • � ti� .1a t{;y �E`��l�dd�r �' • • ,' {7"�+'"i.�r� � _ l• `s i�i��+�a .vi r wk� iJi3t�.1�! e.7•� �+/k -Q�Vail. •� • � ��r4 � J���id�� r�`�! v. .5s~ +r� ( #' l�K1+�y::L6 L a .P.a '° _� #+. 7 1P �v'2� "r :�.� .� a� ✓ I II. - r+`'r3 .lie7AW ? •µ �d a•ld0tiu ri �v� �-• •r a •a•i a ;k `� r� - y --�.`+ is - -- :.: i'.r•-i, P dil.i girt irt.L vR Cs.'..t i 'ul 1.ac l .�rL a . �t. ;� 1 -, z� ��a fY'rYI�, �••-- - emu+ -..�q_0 :J s� r7 irtr r a..• . j' .i..-� i+.. / ,� ���'■�■� ■ c W.. d DO�un a+ t4l+ar=i$:ytr P •_ �' �� ✓ u•, t �1 �o`•l' �• q dJ�r �. •r'r es t.f + v �S �9e. i>t., f ,.�i/��� ":: asi� �,� s •�i4 r i e A"a l�,:.� -c .T ,r Lt�r l �! • - a• -� +� i •1_ ► 1 i wt •• . ,►♦ ''i' ir1 j' 'v �� � �!�w .ir,! ' �•,,r �fy,,. w.�a ss.. R =►�'.�SJ r�+.-11�-.�1t� � � -�,��1�r•� i�i� "•� •r y~ '� ��Y� /. _ � _ u' � a '.z a'mJ:r L 'CB�d'i��i-.YI�� i � -a� J s •t.�.. 1 Item: Final Plat - NW Commons Ph 5 Vicinity Applicant: Em • / Properties Map File FP 2011 -0 114b �yn� 1. s rr AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Counci January 11, 2012 TO: Gary Crutehfie Manager Regular Mtg.: 1/17/12 Rick White, Community & E onomic Development Director ,, V FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner SUBJECT: STREET VACATION (MF# VAC 2011-009) The east 10 feet of Maitland Avenue, adjacent to Block 5 Steffins Amended Addition and a portion of "C" Street(Torres) 1. REFERENCE(S): 1. Overview Map 2. Vicinity Map 3. Proposed Resolution 4. Vacation Petition 1I. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 2 .� 3 1/17: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. NoD ; , setting 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, February 21, 2012, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of Maitland Avenue and a portion of"C" Street. Ill. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE 1V. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. The owners of property abutting portions of Maitland Avenue and "C" Street have petitioned for the vacation of the east 10 feet of Maitland Avenue adjacent to Block 5, Steffins Amended Addition and the north and south 10 feet of"C" Street between Maitland Avenue and Lindsay Avenue. Two of the property owners have future plans to make improvements to their property. B. The petition requires the City Council to fix a public hearing to consider the vacation request. The earliest regular City Council meeting available for a public hearing, which provides the statutory 20-day hearing notice, is February 21, 2012. 3(9) Item: ROW Vacation E. Lewis Street Overview Applicant: Torres Map File #: VAC 2011 -009 '0_ Fla 44 i-y y � • • t ON • ? ' i: s i'i1 y�T:•_ .i r£� w w la iMl ICY 11,E �, __....; -� �,.. ' ?�E• .^���L`• � . MOAK ir W4-.' f , Mr {r° / is ;.— �� _ Y7 -r• ,•,. /•�,.� Item: ROW I Vicini *ty A Plicant: Ramiro Vacation • Maria Torres N Map File 2011 -009 IWO- 0 + , Ar Wfir: , i }t 1 •I •1 el WWI 0%.9—vy '♦ � .` r � � ♦«—a— _ :r�,.. I � ,ems. . '.,� '`� ... •L was � ��•� RESOLUTION NO. 36' A RESOLUTION FIXING THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF SOUTH MAITLAND AVENUE AND EAST "C" STREET. WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate rights-of-way; and WHEREAS, R.C.W. 35.79 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by Resolution, NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That a public hearing to consider vacating the east 10 feet of South Maitland Avenue from the south right-of-way line of East "B" Street to a point 10 feet south of the north right-of- way line of East "C" Street and the north 10 feet of East "C" Street from the west right-of-way line of South Lindsay Avenue to the east right-of-way line of South Maitland Avenue together with the south 10 feet of East "C" Street from the east right-of-way line of South Lindsay Avenue to the east right-of-way line of South Maitland Avenue, will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on February 21, 2012. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 17`x' day of January, 2012. Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, CMC Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney Vicinity Item: ROW Vacation E. Lewis Street Applicant: Ramiro & Maria Torres x Map File #: VAC 201 1 -009 10 „B,. ST W w Q a Q � Z } Q g o J Simi t a "C" ST T ,01 FEE $200 CITY OF PASCO STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION MASTER FILE # Vk,7_a1l-oo9 DATE SUBMITTED: --1 - r j I, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the following described street/alley rights-of-way: E 16 ' ► 1,1+1 r S A D� APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNED (Legal Description) QD D Print Name: -40:r?'p 1�Gaa�l Sign Name: Address: 2 . ', 1fr Awl' , 5 , c.30 Phone # ,S7-a � Date Print Name: 1 e r r v 4-AA- Sign Name: Date Print Name: Sign Name: AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 11, 2012 TO: Gary Crutchfiel y ger Regular Mtg.: 1/17/12 Rick White, Community & conomic Development Director�� FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner SUBJECT: STREET VACATION (MF# VAC 2011-006) A portion of Pueblo Street, Superior Street, Utah Avenue, Nevada Avenue and Wyoming Avenue (Mickelson) I, REFERENCE(S): 1. Overview Map 2. Vicinity Map 3. Proposed Resolution 4. Property Owner Letter 5. Letter to the Shriners II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/17: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. 331-P , setting 7:00 P.M., Tuesday, February 21, 2012, as the time and date to conduct a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of Pueblo Street, Superior Street, Utah Avenue, Nevada Avenue and Wyoming Avenue. III. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. The owner (Kim Mickelson) of a parcel of land in the 1100 block of Utah Avenue (Lot 2, 13SP 2006-07) has written a Ietter requesting Pueblo Street between Utah Avenue and Nevada Avenue be vacated. The property owner plans to develop his lot for his construction business. Part of the development process requires the improvement of all abutting right-of-way. In this case the property owner would be responsible for street improvements along Utah Avenue and Pueblo Street. Pueblo Street is a street identified in the Oregon Avenue Circulation Plan as a street that should be vacated. B. In early discussions on this matter staff encouraged Mr. Mickelson to pursue the vacation of Pueblo Street. Street vacations may be initiated by a petition from two thirds of the affect property owners or by a resolution adopted by the City Council. In this case half of the abutting property is owned by the Shriners. The Shriner Office in Florida (where the property is managed from) was apprehensive about signing a vacation petition. Staff has discussed the matter with the Shriners by phone and in writing (see Ref ft 5) indicating the City has determined there is no public need for Pueblo Street and the vacation process could be initiated by the City Council. The Shriners have not contacted City staff since August of 2011. The third property owner involved (to the east of M:ickelson's property) has been supportive of past vacations in the area having signed a petition in 2006 for vacation of the north 10 feet of Pueblo Street. C. Many years ago the City Council, with input from the Planning Commission, determined there was no public purpose for Pueblo Street and several other 3(h) undeveloped streets within the Frey's Addition. In this respect Mr. Michelson's vacation request is a small portion of what can be vacated and still maintain the framework of an acceptable circulation system in the area. With much of the property surrounding Mr. Mickelson's under one ownership (the Shriners) there is an opportunity to undertake a larger vacation. All of Puehlo Street east of Utah Avenue can be vacated along with Nevada Avenue and Wyoming Avenue between Superior Street and Salt Lake Street. D. Staff is recommending the Council move forward with this matter by initiating the vacation of the right-of-way discussed above by Council Resolution. Approval of this Resolution only sets a public hearing on the matter; Council is not obligated to actually vacate any part of the subject streets. The earliest regular City Council meeting available for a public hearing, which provides the statutory 20-day hearing notice, is February 21, 2012. Item: Street Vacation ult*ple) Overview A Plicant: Kim Mickelson N Map File VAC 2011 -006 MEN Wit, cur t. Yom. - . •��� - � a..=, - '� - ,� ��� ^� r r W -e �='j Item: Street Vicinity Vacation A , a Micke , Map File - 2011 -006 'FIX _ -�•* - ~ , . lit •� r A..- ,�• c ♦ t �~ r'D 19 -^ M1 - •� I �%` �;"��c,.� t—�:+. -... -tea►"—^ ' �j �. • � _ �� "' :4 �' .*�• _ � ;cam . _ .w .. ir, �- �+ RESOLUTION NO. 3tv�P A RESOLUTION FIXING THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PUEBLO STREET, SUPERIOR STREET, NEVADA AVENUE, WYOMING AVENUE AND UTAH AVENUE. WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate rights-of-way; and WHEREAS, R.C.W. 35.79 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by Resolution, NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That a public hearing to consider vacating all of Pueblo Street east of the east right-of- way line of Utah Avenue, Nevada Avenue between the north right-of-way line of Salt Lake Street and the south right-of-way line of Superior Street, all of Wyoming Avenue south of the south right-of-way line of Superior Street, the south 10 feet of Superior Street from the west right-of-way line of Nevada Avenue to the west line of the Mesa Verde Subdivison and the east 10 feet of Utah Avenue from the north right-of-way line of Salt Lake Street to the north right-of- way line of Pueblo Street, will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers at 525 N. Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on February 21, 2012. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 17`x' day of January, 2012. Matt Watkins Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, CMC Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney Vicinity Item• Street Vacation (Multiple)Applicant: Kim Mickel son x Map File #: VAC 2011 -006 SITE 10' W 9 �o� SvQ�µ�oRS � w w m 80' 70' 74 80' G� 10, S� SP�� EKE Kim& Sue-Ann Mickelson 6111 Coventry Lane Pasco,WA 99301 509-547-2774 home 509-380-3785 cell October 3,2011 Pasco City Council Pasco, WA 99301 Re: Pueblo St.,east of Utah Ave., Pasco We,Kim and Sue-Ann Nickelson,are the property owners of 1105 Utah Avenue,and we are considering putting up a commercial building on our property. We are asking that the Pasco City Council consider vacating a portion of Pueblo Street, immediately east of Utah Ave., in East Pasco. The City of Pasco wants this street vacated in this area, and although the majority land owner, The Shriner's,doesn't want to start the proceedings, they are not opposed to the City of Pasco vacating this street. Thank-you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Kim Nickelson COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 509-545-3441 / Fax 509-545-3499 P.O.Box 293, 525 N. 3rd Avenue Pasco,Washington 99301 / communitydevelopm.ent @ pasco-wa.gov October 3I, 2011 Tom Guthrie Shriners Hospitals 4(VC)Cj Finance & Accounting 2900 Rocky Point Dr. 0 Tampa, FL 33607 RE: Street Vacation in Pasco, Washington Dear Mr. Guthrie: This letter is a follow-up to the discussion we had earlier in the year regarding a request to vacate a portion of Pueblo Street bordering a segment of the Shriners property in Pasco (see neap). One of the property owners abutting Pueblo Street has again asked the City to proceed with vacating the street. The City Council is permitted by law (RCW 35.79.010) to initiate street vacations without the receipt of a petition from property owners. This is typically done in cases where there is no public purpose for the retention of a particular street right-of-way. Many years ago the Planning Commission and City Council determined that Pueblo Street served no public purpose and could be vacated. Vacated right-of-way reverts back to the property it originally came from. In this case, when Pueblo Street is vacated the south half of the right-of-way would become Shriners property. Shriners would pick up an additional 40' by 270' strip of land at no cost to Shriners. Your property would still have access from Utah Avenue, Salt Lake Street and Nevada Avenue. The monetary benefit that accrues to your property as the result of vacating Pueblo Street could be substantial. Property owners are responsible for developing all unimproved right- of-way abutting their property, Those improvements include curb, gutter, sidewalk, handicapped ramps, road base, pavement, catch basins, storm drains, street lights, signage, stripping, utilities and fire hydrants. The vacation of Pueblo Street will eliminate the need for these costly improvements. As we begin to process the street vacation you will be mailed a notice of the hearing. In the interim if you have any questions let me know. Sincerely, David McDonald City Planner � O r IPA J I c ! r Ison- l l J 010 \ �co.10 to � N BEECH AVENUE AGENDA REPORT January 3, 2012 FOR: City Coun Workshop Meeting; 1/09/12 Regular Meeting: l/17/11 TO: Gary Crutch ty Manager Rick Terway, istrative & Commu ces Director FROM: Dunyele Masoi , Financial Services Manager �� SUBJECT: STORMWATER RATES 1. REFERENCE(S): 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. Stormwater Fund Analysis 11. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/09 Discussion 1/17 MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No adjusting the stormwater utility rates effective February 1, 2012 and, further, to authorize the publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: (Stormwater Utility, Utility Tax) IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) On 3/21/11 council approved a stoninwater rate increase of$1.20 per month (from $1.80 to $3.00) as well as an offsetting decrease of$ 1.20 per month in sewer. This increase was a preliminary estimate to increase stormwater revenues sufficiently to meet current stormwater costs pending a formal rate analysis to determine the long-term rate requirements. B) The formal rate analysis for the stormwater fund was recently completed. The analysis shows an additional rate increase is needed to provide approximately $340,000 per year additional resources to meet current operating needs, perform minimal capital improvements and to restore fund balance to the target 15% of annual operating expenses. Under option A) below this would raise the rate$0.90 per month to $3.90. C) With the proposed rate adjustments,the City's residential stormwater rate would compare with those of neighboring cities as shown below: Kennewick $2.65 Yakima $3.58 Richland $3.85 Pasco $3.90 Walla Walla $6.30 V. DISCUSSION: A) The required stormwater rate revenue could be generated via a 30% increase effective February 1, 2012. The 2012 Stormwater rate would increase by $0.90 per month (from $3.00 to $3.90). This alternative was used to prepare the 2012 budget. B) Staff recommends approval of the 30% increase effective February 1, 2012. 8(a) ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, amending Pasco Municipal Code Sections 3.07.190 Stormwater Utility charges. tD WHEREAS, The City Council has determined that certain adjustments to the Stormwater user fees are required to fulfill associated financial requirements of the stormwater utility; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, Does Ordain as Follows: Section 1. PMC Section 3.07.190 STORMWATER UTILITY, is amended as follows: Monthly Charges Per Rate Authority Fee Authority Single Family Residence 3:99 3.90 unit 107.190 A(1) 13.60.070 Multi-Family 4-.&9 1.95 unit 3.07.190 A (2) 13.60.070 Apartments 9 1.95 unit 107.190 A(3) 13.60.070 Undeveloped parcel - - mo 3.07.190 A(4) 13.60.070 Vacant building 3:89 3.90 mo 3.07.190 A(5) 13.60.070 Parking 0-5 vehicles 9--98 3.90 mo 3.07.190 B (1) 13.60.070 Parking 6-10 vehicles 79 7.80 mo 3.07.190 B (2) 13.60.070 Parking 11-15 vehicles i2.99 15.60 mo 107.190 B (3) 13.60.070 Parking 16+vehicles 16.99 19.50 mo 3.07.190 B (4) 13.60.070 Property run off($1.25 min) 66- 8 86.71 acre 3.07.190 B (5) 13.60.070 St Hwy run off($.75min) i6,78 21.71 acre 3.07.190 B (6) 13.60.070 This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and after February 1, 2012 after passage and publication, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular meeting the 17th day of January, 2012. Matt Watkins, Mayor Pro-Tern ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney STORMWATER UTILITY RATE AND FUND BALANCE ANALYSIS (Assumes 2% increase in number of customers each year) Actual Actual I i•=e Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 0/4 Rate Change QNo s+ :, ?:;. n;:. R u Residential Rate 1.80 1.80 300 3.90 3.90 3.911 390 390 OPERATING Operating revenues 478,695 1,004,104 984,255 1,003,940 1,024,019 1,044,500 1,065,390 Operating expenditures (683,950) (876,555) (973,697) (973,697) (973,697) (1,018,197) (1,018,197) Debt - - - - CIP (73,603) (312,998) (111,315) (83,0DO) (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) ENDING CASH (RESERVE) 776,636 497,778 312,329 211,572 158,816 159,138 135,441 132,633 15%Tviget Reserves 102.593 131,4133 146.055 146,055 146,()55 152,730 152 730 AGENDA REPORT Folz: City Counc'I January 1 I, 2012 TO: Gary Crutcl Manager Regular Mtg.: 1/17112 FROM: Rick White Community & Economic Development Director SUBJECT: Mandatory Sidewalk Installation in LID 149 (Kurtzman} I. REFERENCE{S}: 1. Proposed Resolution 2. Right of way inventory map 3, City Engineer's Detennination II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1117: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , setting 7:00 p.m., Monday, February 6, 2012, as the time and date to conduct a hearing to consider sidewalk installation on Hugo Avenue between Alton and Lewis Streets. Ill. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. LID 149 for the northern portion of the Kurtzman neighborhood was formed at the December 19"' COI l Council Meeting and is in the 30 day protest period. The LID uses Block Grant and owner contributions to pay for the infrastructure improvements. Use of Block Grant funds in LID 149 has resulted in 55% of the total project cost estimate to be paid for with federal funds. In addition, CDBG monies will be requested in the 2013 allocation process for LID assistance to qualifying low/moderate income households once construction is complete. B. Efforts to obtain right of way dedication from property owners and participation in this last phase of the neighborhood improvement project have been underway since 2010. C. Improvements under an LID must be located within the public right of way. Most properties on Hugo have dedicated needed right of way but four owners have not. Tiiis will result in installation of curb and gutter adjacent these four properties through LID 149, but not the installation of sidewalk. The net effect will be an irregular pattern of sidewalk installation on Hugo between Alton and Lewis Streets that compromises pedestrian safety. D, The City Engineer has determined that continuous installation of sidewalk within the LID 149 area is necessary for public safety and convenience. PMC 12.08 allows installation of public sidewalk through Council Order under these circumstances. The process is similar to the local improvement district process, and provides for a lien against the property if sidewalk installation does not occur within the time specified by the Council Order, V. DISCUSSION: A. Neighborhood improvements in areas lacking infrastruCr.;re is a longstanding Council goal. The use of CDBG monies for an area-wide benefit and for LID assistance reduces the impact of improving neighborhood infrastructure on low/moderate income households, B. If City Council indicates that sidewalk must be installed, the remaining four property owners may decide to dedicate the right of way and use the LID process to install sidewalk. If property is not dedicated and sidewalk is not installed through the LID process, then the owners must install at their own higher costs through individual contractor agreements. C. Individual installation of sidewalk outside of LID 149 is estimated to cost S20 per linear foot. compared to $12 per linear foot through LID 149. The final actual cost of individual installation is mostly dependen*, on contractor availability for smaller protects and time of installation. D, The decision by the remaining four property owners to dedicate necessary right of way and participate fully in LID 149 should be concluded before the project goes to bid — by early March. Towards that end, a public hearing should be held to provide the opportunity for public comment on mandatory installation of sidewalk through PMC 12.08. S(b) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION FIXING THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE INSTALLATION OF SIDEWALKS ON HUGO AVENUE THROUGH PASCO MUNCIPAL CODE SECTION 12.08. WHEREAS, Local Improvement District 149 was formed to install street infrastructure improvements that include curb,gutter and sidewalk; and WHEREAS, Sidewalks are urban amenities that provide pedestrians a safer alternative to walking within a travelled roadway: and WHEREAS, Hugo Avenue within Local Improvement District 149 provides a route for pedestrians to Virgie Robinson Elementary School; and WHEREAS, Owners of isolated lots within Local Improvement District 149 have not dedicated rights of way to allow construction of sidewalks through Local Improvement District 149 which will result in irregular sidewalk installation; and WHEREAS, The missing segments of sidewalks will not provide a consistent walking surface for pedestrians and pose a tripping hazard; and WHEREAS, The missing segments of sidewalks will be rough and uneven during periods of wet or freezing weather; and WHEREAS, The missing segments of sidewalks will not conform to the Americans with Disabilities Act and will prevent access to properties for residents with mobility issues and, WHEREAS, The City Engineer has determined that continuous sidewalk be constructed within the area of Local Improvement District 149 meeting current Americans with Disabilities Act standards and City regt6rements; and WHEREAS, Pasco Municipal Code allows City Council to order construction of sidewalks upon receipt of a report from the City Engineer that such construction is necessary for public safety and convenience; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That a public hearing to consider the installation of sidewalk by Council Order through provisions of Pasco Municipal Code 12.08 on Hugo Avenue between Alton and Lewis Streets, wa ll be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 525 North Third Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m„ on the 6th Day of February, 2012. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2012 Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM; Debbie L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney 50' ,60' LEWi9� i • • • Q • a w • • • • • • Legend • LID 149 50' ALTON ST ® ROW Needed Houses LID 149 ROW Widths LPASC001 Me e qqF107 Public Works Department Engineering Division To: Rick White, Director, Community & Economic Development From: Michael A. Pawlak, PE, City Engineer Date: January 4, 2012 Re: Sidewalk Construction within Local Improvement District#149 At your request and at the direction of City Council, Engineering Division staff has reviewed the areas along Hugo Avenue, Cedar Avenue and Afton Street located within the proposed Local Improvement District #149 (LID #149). These streets are currently unimproved and do not have sidewalks or other pedestrian facilities. Sidewalks are an urban amenity that provide pedestrians with a safer alternative to walking within the travelled way (roadway). One of the primary reasons for establishing LID#149 is to improve the street and frontage infrastructure, including providing sidewalks along this particular residential neighborhood. Installation of the sidewalks will provide the neighborhood with a safer pedestrian environment than what currently exists. There are, however, a few properties which have not dedicated the necessary right-of-way to construct sidewalks. These "missing segments" provide a larger safety issue than no sidewalks at all. Once sidewalks are installed, the pedestrian has the expectation that there will be a continuous sidewalk facility. The missing, sidewalk segments will not provide a consistent walkway surface for pedestrians including persons with disabilities. The surfaces will likely be rough and uneven as well as potentially soft during periods of wet weather. The surface unevenness will also provide the potential for tripping hazards and possibly prevent access to those residents with mobility issues. The missing sidewalk segments will essentially jeopardize the ability of the sidewalk facilities along the streets to conform to the current Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) requirements. Because of these issues, it is my determination that continuous sidewalk be constructed within the area of LID #149. It is my recommendation that City Council require property owners within LID #149 who have not dedicated the necessary right-of-way for sidewalk construction along their frontage, to construct new sidewalk at their own cost. Such sidewalk shall conform to current ADA requirements and match the sidewalk being constructed by the LID. 0 Page 1 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 3, 2012 TO: Gary Crutch tty Manager Workshop Mtg.: 1/9/12 Regular Mtg.. 1/17/12 FROM: Stan Strebei, D p tv 7ity Manager ,=Y� SUBJECT: Oregon Avenue Frontage Improvements 1. REFERENCE(S): 1. Resolution No. 2337 2. Ordinance No. 3255 3. Proposed Resolution 11. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/9: Discussion 1/17: MOTION: l move to approve Resolution No. revising City policy on required street improvements on Oregon Avenue. III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2337 in 1997 to affirm City policy on required street improvements in the Oregon Avenue corridor. The corridor area is shown in the attachment to Ordinance No. 3255, attached hereto. The intent of the resolution was to set forth the right-of-way improvements required for development in the area with the exception of Oregon Avenue. Oregon Avenue was exempted due to its designation as a State Highway. B) As the City is undertaking a process, in conjunction with WSDOT, to determine a plan for the future needs and improvements required along Oregon Avenue, it is important to state the City's intent as well as to repeal language in the prior resolution which may be contrary to the direction that the plan will take. C) The proposed Resolution will act to repeal language in Resolution No. 2337, regarding Oregon Avenue that is in conflict with current direction (and thus, confusing to property owners and developers). D) The proposed Resolution also sets out interim development requirements for Oregon Avenue and expectations until the plan is completed. V. DISCUSSION: A) Staff recommends approval of the resolution. 8(c) RESOLUTION NO.c=, 7 A RESOLUTION affirming City policy on required street improvements in the Oregon Avenue Corridor. WHEREAS, adequately develop and improved rights-of-way are necessary for access to property, for the movements of goods and services within the community, for timely response by emergency personnel and equipment, and for maintaining the general welfare; and WHEREAS, adequately developed and 'unproved rights-of-way are necessary for continued and future orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, adequately developed and improved rights-of-way improve and secure property values; and WHEREAS, adequately developed and improved rights-of-way means rights-of- way that contain curb, gutter, sidewalk, illumination, traffic control devices, drainage control, engineered road bases, asphalt driving and parking lanes, and monumentation all as approved by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Circulation Plan for the Oregon Avenue Corridor and has determined through a unanimous vote that right-of-way improvements as described herein above, should be required and constructed on all rights- of-way (except Oregon Avenue) identified in the Plan when property adjoining said rights- of-way is developed; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation for right-of-way improvements in the Oregon Avenue Corridor and determined that said improvements axe needed to insure the public is properly served in terms maintaining the general welfare of the community; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: Section I Tliit adequate and proper right-of-way improvements shall be required at the time adjoining property is developed and shall be required on ail streets identified in the Oregon Avenue Circulation Plan dated August 1997 or any amendment thereto, except Oregon Avenue (State Route 397). Secti-on 2 . That adequate and proper right-of-way improvements shall include: curb, gutter, sidewalk, illumination, traffic control devices, drainage control, engineered road bases, asphalt driving and parking lanes, and monumentation. All such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to construction and acceptance. Section 3 . That the developer of real property shall be responsible for installing the required improvements within the respective half of right-of-way width abutting the real property being developed, provided such improvements consist of at least two (2) traffic lanes. Section 4 . That the unused portion of right-of-way along Oregon Avenue shah be deveioped with turf ground cover, swaled for drainage control purposes and maintained by the adjoining property owners. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of O 1997. Charles D. Mbury, May r Catherine D. Seaman, Deputy City Clerk APPR D A TO FORM: Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney ORDINANCE NO. J aY-fi AN ORDINANCE relating to streets and amending the circulation plan for the Oregon Avenue Corridor. WHEREAS, the location and development of streets plays an important function in maintaining the safety and welfare of the public; and, WHEREAS, the proper location and development of streets is vital to the continued orderly development of the City; and, WHEREAS, from time to time the City Council reviews the need for modifying circulation patterns within the City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council previously adopted a circulation plan for the Oregon Avenue Corridor. That circulation plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission and in anticipation of future growth the Planning Commission recommended that the plan be modified by extending Spokane Street east to Wehe Avenue and by extending Wehe Avenue north to Salt Lake Street; NOW,THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Ordinance No. 3238, "The Oregon Ave Circulation Plan", be and same is hereby amended to show changes as indicated in Exhibit"I" attached hereto. Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after passage and publication as required by law. . PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, , day of , 1997. Charles D. Kilbury 4 Mayor ATTEST: APPROVE S TO FORM: CATHERINE D. SEAMAN Leland B. Kerr Deputy City Clerk City Attorney e4 MAW k' mm ST trz— Tj N, \lN All MVA AM r- —4— —01 wAk'0\ I M lei, NA \NXII�`y 71 J> r� ,.!1��11,r `11 ', ` 1 � !1`�!= i , !tr �" j li�.�;ll 1��1,1�. ,t� %k 1 'W I,W AK r tl`���111t� ILLLL i LLLLU=i ji x I i j i I I rl I I AVf OWN 11" A Al� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION REVISING CITY POLICY ON REQUIRED STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON OREGON AVENUE. WHEREAS, by adoption of Resolution No. 2337 (October 6, 1997), the City Council set forth and affirmed policy requiring adequate and proper right-of-way improvements be installed at the time of development of properties adjoining streets identified in the Oregon Avenue Circulation Plan (August 1997), except for Oregon Avenue(SR397); and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2337 provides that the "unused portion of the right-of-way along Oregon Avenue shall be developed with turf ground cover, swaled for drainage control purposes and maintained by the adjoining property owner";and WHEREAS, Oregon Avenue is transitioning to a more highly developed urban corridor with a need for a higher level of improvement of the right-of-way than in the past; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco is working with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) to establish a plan for the future of Oregon Avenue, including required frontage improvement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, Section 1: That the intent of the City Council is to revise City policy with respect to required right-of- way improvements on Oregon Avenue. Section 2: That any provisions of Resolution No. 2337 pertaining to Oregon Avenue which are in conflict with this resolution are hereby repealed and of no effect. Section 3: That, pending the completion of the plan for the future of Oregon Avenue, right-of-way improvements required at the time adjoining property is developed shall include: a) Roadway widening to provide a 66-foot wide full-depth driving surface, each property owner shall be responsible for providing half-street width (33 feet); b) Access management (driveway location, size and number) as determined jointly by the City and W SDOT; c) Storm drainage facilities consistent with the roadway configuration; and d) Other improvements, as necessary, but limited to: i. Extension of existing water and sewer utilities; ii. Fire hydrants as required by the Fire Department; iii. Street illumination or traffic control devices that may be required for public safety due to special conditions of project development. All such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to construction and acceptance. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at its regular meeting this 17th day of January, 2012. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council January 3, 2012 FROM: Gary Crutchfiel 1, Manager Workshop Mtg.: 1/9/12 Regular Mtg.: 1/l7/12 SUBJECT: Emergency Communication System 1. REFERENCE(S): 1, e-Gov Study (Provided previously to City Council via email; copy available for public review on the city's webpage at http://,,vww.pasco- wa.goy/city counc ilrcports) 2. Memo from Fire Chief 3. Memo from Chief of Police 4. Letter from Police Officers Association 5. Cost Allocation Comparison 6. Proposed Resolution I1. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/9: Discussion 1/17: MOTION: C move to approve Resolution No. , endorsing a regional emergency communications system and urging the public safety agencies within Franklin County to implement such a system in calendar year 2012. III. FISCAL IMPACT: See below. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) Since the early 1970s, Pasco has relied on the Franklin County Sheriff's Office (FCSO) for emergency dispatch and communications (radio) services. As the Tri-Cities has grown and matured as an increasingly metropolitan region, coupled with Pasco's own surge in residential growth over the past decade, the sociological barrier once presented by the Columbia River has all but disappeared. With the growth of cell phones and other technological changes in the way citizens communicate as well as the obvious need for interoperability between emergency responders, the need for improved emergency communications within the metropolitan area has become pronounced (see reference ##2, memorandum from Fire Chief), B) The two counties in late 2010 contracted with a national consulting firm (e-Gov) last year to study the current emergency communications systems, with the objective of identifying interoperability improvements and a regional governance model. The study was completed in October and found the existing circumstances of two separately governed dispatch centers and two separate radio systems (one in VHF and the other 800 MH) to be unnecessarily complex, deficient in service f=unction and financially wasteful. The report recommends that through the use of available technology, the two radio systems can be operated in tandem under a single governance structure, thus improving not only interoperability and emergency back-up capability, but reducing public cost as well. 8(d) V. DISCUSSION: A) The need for "interoperability" (direct communication between separate emergency responder agencies) is not only for the extraordinary emergency. It has become essential for daily law enforcement operations as criminal movement across the river has become commonplace. Operational testing of the two radio systems in Pasco reveals that the g00 MflZ system provides a much more clear and reliable communication method between individual law enforcement officers as well as between officers and dispatch in the conduct of their daily operations. These are critical considerations in the conduct of law enforcement operations (see reference 93, memorandum from Police Chief). B) The e-Gov study suggests that the current systems can and should be joined and governed under a single regional board, thus providing the interoperability and real-time backup capability for emergency communications over both counties. The single entity governance could also reduce the regional cost by eliminating duplicative staff and technology costs. Indeed, after Pasco staff analyzed existing costs of the various emergency communication services presently used by the city's emergency departments versus the suggested allocation of cost under the regional concept, it is apparent that regionalization of the system will not cost Pasco any more than it will spend in 2012 and, more likely, will decrease. And contrary to initial assUunptions, the annual cost for Franklin County will decrease (see reference 44). C) In short, the single regional system, if structured similar to the e-Gov recommendations, would accomplish the following: • Eliminate misdirected cell phone calls to 911, thus improving the response time to those emergencies; • Improve the clarity of communication for law enforcement operations within the urban area; • Expand the emergency communication options for law enforcement; • Provide an opportunity to manage the delivery of emergency communication services through a regional governance structure; • Reduce total public cost of emergency communications within the bi-county region. D) The cities of Kennewick, Richland, West Richland and Prosser have all endorsed the e-Gov study recommendations, as has both Benton County and Franklin County Board of Commissioners. The two county commissions recently requested the state fund a technical study of how to implement a central call center, to include funding opportunities. It is hoped that the crrrrnties' study will be completed by April. E) Staff recommends the City Council approve the proposed Resolution to endorse the e-Gov recommendations. In addition, the Resolution urges all public safety agencies in Franklin County (as well as Pasco staff) to take all appropriate steps necessary to implement a regional governance model for emergency communications, to include 800 MHZ radio communications for Pasco law enforcement, not later than December 2012. Date: December 19, 2011 To: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager From: Robert Gear, Fire Chief Re: Bi-County Communications Platform The issue of communications between the dispatch centers and responders within Benton and Franklin counties continues to be an issue. We have recently completed a"high elevation" study by the consulting group e-gov, which showed graphically the problems and possible solutions that we face. As you are aware, responder communications is not the only problem, communications between the public and the 911 answering points is increasingly become a problem as the phone systems switch from primarily hard wire systems to wireless (cellphone) systems. This problem is going to become even more severe as we attempt to "catch up" to what's commonly tensed "next gen. 91 1" which is going to be more text and video based. While the fire service in the area is not plagued with the radio communications issues that the law agencies have, we have a significant resource allocation issue that needs to be addressed to maximize our efficiencies. I have outlined a brief history and some supporting information to the e-gov recommendations. Background; A) For many years the dispatch centers serving Benton and Franklin counties operated with a minimal amount of communications between the centers. As the communities grew and political boundaries were no longer a barrier to providing services this lack of communications became a more significant issue. B) The Bi-County Police Information (BiPin) system was an initial effort to cross political boundaries with essential law enforcement information. BiPin was the only communications link between Benton County and Franklin county Law enforcement agencies. The need to update the records management component of BiPin led to both dispatch centers choosing a common Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) system in 2005. BiPin is currently a "separate" entity linked to the CAD in Benton County and the CAD in Franklin counties and provides shared law enforcement information. C) Although the same CAD provider was required for BiPin to operate within both counties, no effort was made to provide for CAD to CAD communications. D) Recause of technological limitations in the early days of 911 implementation it was necessary to have separate 911 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAP's) in Benton and Franklin Counties. When the majority of 911 calls were land line phone completed this was not a problem. However, currently over 80% of the 911 calls initiate from cell phones and some of those calls are directed to the incorrect dispatch center. In addition to misdirected calls the next generation of 911 users is coming and they don't communicate the same as the past generation. In addition Federal law has mandated that hearing impaired must have equal access to emergency communications through text messaging that they utilized in the past through the TTY system. What this means is 911 answering points must be able to receive and process text message requests for help as well as video transmissions of crime in progress. Not only must we be able to receive these messages but there is an expectation that they can be quickly passed to a field unit to view_ E) Franklin County Emergency Management received a $75,000 Interoperable Communication Grant in October of 2010 to study the best method of developing interoperable communications between the dispatch centers serving Benton and Franklin counties. This grant was used to fund the e-gov study. F) Due to the high costs of technology neither Dispatch center has been able to develop"live" backup capability for their actual buildings,communications and information systems. In the event of a major failure field units operating within their respective counties will be literally "on their own" G) Franklin and Benton counties Board of Commissioners have asked the Washington State Enhanced 91 1 office to conduct a technical study of combining the 911 PSAP for Franklin County and the 911 PSAP for Benton County into a single PSAP. Recommendations; A) Improve service delivery through streamlined, interoperable systems. Deployment of fire/ems and law enforcement resources within the urban area is essential to meeting the growing service demands with limited funding. When the collective fire agencies within the Tri-cities urban area operate autonomously none of them individually can fully staff a working residential fire. Working through one communications systems that views the urban area as a single resource pool has allowed us to staff two working fires simultaneously. B) Reduce ongoing upgrade and maintenance costs. Beaton and Franklin counties operate the same make/model of CAD system in two counties, with each system being separated, with limited communications through the BiPin link. This same CAD system make/model operates from a single system serving whole countries in multiple dispatch locations(New Zealand, Belgium). These two systems must be individually licensed annually and upgraded every two to three years to maintain current technology. Both centers must maintain a CAD administrator to operate the separate systems, however one is not"allowed"to touch the others system. C) Provide for backup of both systems and dispatch capabilities. While both counties operate the same CAD system, there is no backup to either system,outside the walls of their facilities. The technological equipment associated with the CAD system is not in buildings or rooms tnlly designed as"Server Centers". Something as simple as a broken sprinkler head could wipeout all the technology and information within one dispatch center. Neither county has a"live" backup to their ongoing information. Again, loss of either centers operationnl capability will result in missed 911 calls, officers on the street without vital information or a contact, fire/ems units unable to call for additional resources to an incident, or in other words,a complete loss of response capability for an indefinite period of time. By operating from two separate centers, sharing a single CAD data base, with backup 911 answering capability at each center we can eliminate this risk without additional costs. D) Reduce support complexity. With the current"system of systems" it is very difficult to maintain and impossible to maximize the efficiency. Each part of the systems from radio to CAD to BiPin has separate organizational responsibilities. There are currently at least seven different parties responsible for a portion of CAD, BiPin and radio communications system between the two counties, Trying to isolate and repair a problem is time consuming and more expensive than it should be. f qq 0 p \\ 4 y {L 44o-r 4 � R k' P MEMORANDUM Bob Metzger, Police Chief TO: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager FROM Bob Metzger, Police Chief RE: Reasons for reviewing the 800 MHZ system DATE: 12-21-2011 Since my arrival here over 2 months ago I have been reviewing our current radio system as well as the proposed regionalized 800 MHZ system. I have carefully reviewed the E-Gov study and with my background in combined central dispatch systems in several communities, I wanted to determine if this proposal would be good for our department and improve the safety of officers. It did not take long for me to realize that our current system is not working as well as it could and that we have a readily available solution to our problems that can be done very easily and quickly. Over the past 20+years many police agencies across the country have been moving toward a single radio system to be used jointly by several agencies. The events of 9/11 made it clear to all public safety agencies that interoperability of radio systems is important for the safety of not only officers but also the public, Based on my experiences with an 800 MHZ police radio system and my review of the E-Gov study, I would recommend that we continue our efforts at becoming part of a regionalized dispatch system for the following reasons: Our current system has limitations. These limitations include: • interoperability — We cannot communicate with any department in Benton County, even though we work with them on a daily basis. We also have joint operations such as Metro and SWAT that use the 800 system and we are not on the system. • Communication —Our current system has several "dead" areas in the city where we cannot communicate. Many other areas have poor transmission quality and it is difficult to understand what is being said. We also have problems in most buildings getting radio communication out with our current VHF portable radios. We have trouble getting our portable radios to work inside of Lourdes emergency room as well as some areas of our schools. Officers using the 800 MHZ system have no problems getting their radios to work in these same areas. • Lack of frequencies— We share a single frequency with all other agencies in Franklin County and there are times when there is more traffic than this frequency can handle. • Safety —Officers working in patrol need effective and clear communication. If officers do not hear a call there is community safety concern in not getting officers to the scene of a serious crime in a timely manner. • Lack of control — Our current system does not give us any control over operations of the dispatch center. We are just billed for the service. • Cost — Our costs for this service have gone up over 130% in 6 years. Positives to moving to the 800 MHZ system: • lnteroperability— All police agencies in the tri city area would be able to communicate. • Communication — We have tested this system in Pasco, and we have no "dead" spots, the communication is very clear and it is able to transmit from inside buildings. • Frequencies— With an 800 MHZ system we would have multiple channels to use including several what would just be for our department. These could be used for special events, or at times when we have a serious situation going on where the need for good communication is important. • Safety —With all departments on the same frequency we will have an easier time getting needed support in a timely fashion from other agencies. This is a huge safety factor for officers and citizens. • Control—All area Police Chiefs will meet to make sure the system is functioning as it should. Each government unit will also have control of the budget and how the system operates. • Costs—we will be better able to control costs. I have been involved in putting together 4 other central dispatch operations such as the one being proposed here. My review of this system gives me confidence that for all the reasons 1 have listed here we can and should go to the 800 MHZ radio system over our current VHF radio system. The infrastructure for the 800 MHZ radio system is already in place and our coverage would be better than we are getting now. We can continue putting money into our current VHF radio system, but in the long run it will not solve our current or future needs. As Police Chief the safety of officers on the street, and our residents, is a big concern of mine. This radio system would provide officers the tools they need to do their jobs more effectively with greater safety. Respectfully submitted, lk�— -4— Robert Metzger Police Chief IMAL IFALS 0 FOLI C OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION December 14, 2011 To whom it may concern: The Pasco Police Officer's Association has been made aware of negotiations to move the Pasco Police communications from Franklin County to SECOMM. In doing so,the radio system would change from VHF to an 800 MHz system. The Pasco Police Officers Association is in favor of this change and welcomes enhancements this would offer. Over the last several years the current radio communications system being employed by the Franklin County Sher'iff's Office has failed to afford our officers the trust and security they need in communications. Our members continue to note numerous areas within our community where radio communication is poor to nonexistent. To the Sheriffs Office credit,they have spent a considerable amount of time and money to remedy the problem. It still exists,though. Our members have been put in many situations where their safety was compromised due to poor communications and other officers not Knowing they needed assistance. There is also the frustration of communications of a non- emergent nature that occur daily. Our fellow law enforcement agencies in the area communicate on the 800 MHz system. This makes communication with these agencies nearly impossible because of the differing frequency spectrums. With a transition to SECOMM,the Pasco Police Department would be able to communicate easily with neighboring agencies. This would help facilitate joint Investigations and the apprehension of subjects as they flee from one jurisdiction to another. For the safety of our members and increased communication ability with neighboring agencies,the Pasco Police Officer's Association supports a change in the communications center from Franklin County to SECOMM. D erry Curt King Jeff Harpster President First Vice President Second Vice President Cost Allocation Comparison Franklin County Regional Allocation Model 2012 Budget Agency Charge Dispatch i-mobile Microwave Access Total Change Pasco Police $924,186 $860,552 $782 $693 $4,708 $866,735 -$57,451 Pasco Fire $65,664 $135,907 $460 $693 $137,060 $71,396 Connell Police $59,850 $58,241 $693 $58,934 -$916 Connell Fire $365 $693 $1,058 $1,058 FCSO $227,070 $177,421 $368 $693 $4,708 $183,190 -$43,880 FCFD#1 $3,600 $2,376 $693 $3,069 -$531 FCFD#2 $1,800 $2,558 $693 $3,251 $1,451 FCFD#3 $10,600 $13,815 $693 $14,508 $3,908 FCFD#4 $1,800 $1,827 $693 $2,520 $720 FCFD#S $1,800 $1,096 $693 $1,789 -$11 FCHD $12,0751 $17,140 $693 $17,8331 $5,758 Total $1,308,4451 $1,271,298 $1,289,947 -$18,498 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ENDORSING A REGIONAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AND URGING THE GOVERNING BODIES OF PUBLIC SAFETY AGENCIES WITHIN FRANKLIN COUNTY TO IMPLEMENT SUCH A SYSTEM IN CALENDAR YEAR 2012, WHEREAS, e-Gov, a qualified consultant, has studied the existing, separate emergency communication systems used in each of Benton and Franklin Counties and has concluded that combining the two systems under a single regional governance structure could improve emergency response capabilities in both counties and reduce the combined cost of the existing system;and WHEREAS, the emergency communications system provided currently by Franklin County cannot provide the scope and quality of emergency communication capability needed to serve the growing urban population center in Pasco, representing more than 80% of the entire population of Franklin County; and WHEREAS, both the Pasco Fire Chief and the Pasco Police Chief have each reviewed the e- Gov study and concluded that emergency services to citizenry as well as emergency responder safety will be improved by combining the communication systems under a single regional governance and central emergency call center; and WHEREAS, evaluation of the present cost of emergency communication services compared to a combined regional system indicates that the cost of such services for Pasco and Franklin County would likely decrease; NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Pasco hereby endorses the concept of a single regional emergency communications system as envisioned in the e-Gov study. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Pasco hereby urges the governing bodies of public safety agencies within Franklin County to take all steps necessary and appropriate to make available such a regional system, including 800 MHz communications for Pasco law enforcement, before the close of calendar year 2012. Section 3: That the Pasco City Manager is hereby directed to take all steps necessary and appropriate to prepare for participation in a regional system, including 800 MHz for law enforcement operations, by the close of calendar year 2012. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at its regular meeting this 17th day of January,2012. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council � January 9; 2012 FROM: Gary Crutchfie y Manager Regular Mtg.: 1/17/12 SUBJECT: City Council Repr'j Manager on Boards and Committees 1. REFERENCE(S): 1. Resolution 2. Proposed list of Board and Committee Assignments for 2012-2013 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/17 MOTION: 1 move to approve Resolution Igo. , confirming Mayoral appointments to various Boards and Committees. 111, FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) City Council representation is required on a number of municipal and regional boards and committees. The practice of the City Council has been to make Council appointments to the various boards and committees on a biennial basis; thus, appointments generally are for a two-year period. Changes to these appointments, if necessary, can be made at any time by action of the Mayor and City Council. B) Council discussed the various appointment alternatives at the prior workshop meeting and generally concluded the proposed appointments to be appropriate for the 2012-13 period. 8(e) RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION confirming Mayoral appointments of Councilmembers to various Boards and Committees. WHEREAS, various boards and committees, serving both regional and local purposes, require representation by the Pasco City Council; and WHEREAS, PMC 2.06.020 reserves authority to the Mayor for appointment of members to advisory committees subject to confirmation of the City Council; and WHEREAS, Mayor Watkins, after consultation with Councilmembers, has declared appointments to the respective boards and committees reflected in the list attached hereto; NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Pasco City Council hereby confirms the appointments to the respective boards and committees reflected in the list attached hereto, until otherwise modified by action of the Mayor and City Council. Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 17th day of January 2012. Matt Watkins, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney BOARD AND COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS CALENDAR YEARS — 2012-2013 Mayoral Appointments to Board and Committee Membership Board/Corniniffee Day Thile Locafion Representative Alternate Emergency Medical Services I" Monday 1:30 p.m. Kennewick General Hospital Tom Larsen Al Yenney Franklin County Mosquito Control District I" Wednesday 12:00 p.m. 2601 N. Capitol Avenue Bob Hoffmann Al Yenney Parks& Recreation Advisory Council I"Thursday 5:30 p.m. Parks&Rec. Classroom Saul Martinez Mike Garrison Senior Citizens Advisory Committee 2" Tuesday 1 0:00 a.m. Senior Center Tom Larsen Bob Hoffmann Tri-Cities Regional PFD Board 2"d Wednesday 5:45 p.m. Varies Matt Watkins, Rebecca Francik, Saul Martinez BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee 2nd Thursday 7:00 a.m. Varies Bob Hoffmann Rebecca Francik Ben-Franklin Transit Board 2nd Thursday 7:00 p.m. Transit Facility Matt Watkins I Mike Garrison Reserve Officers Board 3Cd Monday, as needed 5:30 p.m. Conference Room#1 Matt Watkins and Rebecca Francik LEOFF Disability Board Yd Monday 6:00 p.m. Conference Room#1 Matt Watkins and Rebecca Francik Benton Franklin Council of Governments 3rd Friday 11:30 a.m. Sandberg Event Center Al Yenney Rebecca Francik Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund 4`h Monday 4:00 p.m. Port of Benton Al Yenney Saul Martinez Visitor&Convention Bureau Board 4`h Thursday 7:30 a.m. 7I30 W. Grandridge Mike Garrison Tom Larsen TRIDEC Board of Directors 4`h Thursday 4:00 p.m. 7130 W. Grandridge Mike Garrison Tom Larsen Benton Franklin Community Action Committee 4`''Thursday 5:30 p.m. 710 W. Court Street Al Yenney Rebecca Francik Old Fire Pension Board 2nd Monday, Quarterly 6:30 p.m. Conference Room#1 Rebecca Francik Saul Martinez TRAC Advisory Board 3"Tuesday,Bi-Monthly 5:00 P.M. TRAC Facility Rebecca Francik and A] Yenney Good Roads&Transportation Association 31d Wednesday,Br-Monthly 5:30 p.m. Varies Bob Hoffmann Rebecca Francik Franklin County Emergency Management Council 3rd Thursday, Quarterly 3:30 p.m. Emergency Management Office Matt Watkins Tom Larsen Hanford Communities Governing Board 4'h Friday, Quarterly 7:30 a.m. Richland Council Chambers Mike Garrison Al Yenney (and ECA) Franklin County Solid Waste Advisory Committee As called Franklin County Public Works Mike Garrison Saul Martinez Tom Larsen Matt Watkins BFCG Solid Waste Advisory Committee As called TBD Mike Garrison Tom Larsen Franklin County Law &Justice Council * As called Franklin County Courthouse Bob Hoffmann Mike Garrison Local Housing Trust Fund Oversight Committee * As called 710 W. Court Street Rebecca Francik, Mike Garrison, Saul Martinez *Voluntary(Council representation not required) 1/12 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council January 6, 2012 FROM: Gary Crutchfi. Manager Workshop Mtg.: 119112 Regular Mtg.: 1 17112 SUBJECT: Public Safety Sales Tax Measure 1. REFERENCE(S): I. Franklin County Resolution No. 2011-281 2. Memorandum from Police Chief 3. Tentative Allocation Schedule II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 119: Discussion 1117: MOTION: I move to authorize three additional police officer positions and one additional sergeant position to form the Street Crimes Unit. 1117: MOTION: I move to authorize four additional police sergeant positions dependent on elimination of one police captain position and three corporal positions. III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) Franklin County's "Public Safety Sales Tax" ballot measure was approved by 62% of the voters, county-wide, at the November 2011 general election. The sales tax measure will add three-tenths of one percent, resulting in a new total local sales tax rate of 8.6%. The Commission took formal action in December to implement the tax; however, state late requires a 75-day waiting period, to provide all parties sufficient time to prepare for the collection and disbursement of the new tax. Thus, the tax collection is expected to commence April 1. Based on 2010 sales tax data, Franklin County estimates the new tax measure will generate approximately $2.8 million (county-wide) annually. By state law, 40% of that amount is to be allocated to the cities within the county, based on population; Pasco's share, based on 2011 population data, will approximate $1 million annually. B) The ballot proposition (which limits the life of the tax to 30 years) included the express intent to use the proceeds for expansion and operation of the county jail facilities. In addition, the ballot included the intent to use the proceeds for Pasco municipal court, the Pasco police department and criminal gang suppression as well as other public safety purposes (see reference 1). The City Council previously discussed three specific undertakings if the tax measure was approved by voters: construction of a new municipal court; construction of a new police station on the east half of the City Hall campus; and gang suppression. Current assessment of those activities follows: ■ Municipal Court: the current agreement for Municipal Court space in the county's public safety building will expire in May 2012. Recent conversations with county representatives indicate their willingness to simply extend the current agreement for another year or two while the new court space is designed/constructed as part of the new county jail project. That project will 14(a) require a new long-term agreement between the city and county as well. At an estimated cost of$3 million; it may be best to combine part of the new sales tax revenue with other existing sources to discharge the new court construction debt early, thus allowing the new police facility to be constructed within a few years. • Police Station- preliminary design of a new police station was completed about three years ago and the project is estimated to cost about $12 million; a 20-year debt would require annual debt payments of about $1 million. Staff suggests construction occur when the current City Hall debt is paid (2015), thus using the current debt payment to supplement the new sales tax revenue for the police station debt (if necessary). • Gang Suppression: Chief Metzger proposes to establish a "street crimes unit" consisting of four officers focused on a variety of street crime, which usually translates to "gang activities" (see reference 2, memo from Chief Metzger). The cost of this new unit would approximate $400,000 annually. It will take most of a year to hire and train four replacements and prepare to deploy the new unit. V. DISCUSSION: A) It is requested that the street crimes unit be authorized by Council as soon as possible (1117112) so the hiring process can be started. In addition, Chief Metzger has proposed to reorganize the command structure of the police department by reducing a vacant captain position to sergeant and upgrading three corporal positions to sergeant; the cost of the reorganization action, combined, will reflect a modest savings of about $10,000 annually. Those new positions need to be authorized by Council action as well, B) The municipal court project is expected to gain momentum over the next few weeks as the architect contract will be negotiated and brought to City Council for consideration. The police station project is best left on the back humer for the next couple of years, pending final decisions on financing of the court facility and realization of long-term financial considerations. A tentative allocation schedule reelecting all three activities is offered for clarification (see reference 3). FRANKLIN COUNTY RESOLUTION NUMBER 2011-281 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON RE: IN THE SUBJECT MATTER OF CALLING FOR AN ELECTION ON THE LEVY OF A SALES AND USE TAX FOR COUNTY AND CMES' CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY PURPOSES INCLUDING FOR THE IMPROVEMENT, EXPANSION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF A COUNTY JAIL AND OTHER FACILITIES WHEREAS, In Franklin County and the Cities therein there continues to be an increasing demand placed on local public safety services,facilities and the criminal justice system; and WHEREAS, in 1980 Franklin County had a population of 35,025 and In 1990 a population of 37,473; and WHEREAS, the Franklin County Corrections Center (County Jail) was constructed in 1984 to confine a maximum of 102 inmates (102 Inmate beds); and WHEREAS, in recent years due to increases in the County Jail inmate population averaging 190 inmates per day the County Jail has double bunked inmates increasing the jail capacity to 147 beds; and WHEREAS, Franklin County has a current estimated population of 82,500, amounting to a 100+% increase in population since the County Jail was constructed over 25 years ago, and WHEREAS, the County Jail has a current average inmate population of 190, amounting to a per day average of 85+ inmates beyond the facility's 1984 capacity and routinely an inmate population above the facility's current capacity;and WHEREAS, a significant portion of the population increase has occurred in the City of Pasco and continues to do so; and WHEREAS, the County Jail provides for the incarceration of persons arrested within both the incorporated cities' and unincorporated county areas, and thereafter sentenced to jail by all the courts in Franklin County; and WHEREAS, the increase in local population has increased criminal caseloads for the entire local criminal justice system including the Franklin County Sheriff's Office, Prosecuting Attorney, local courts, the County Clerk's Office, and Cities' police departments all of which utilize the County Jail and serve "criminal justice purposes' per RCW 82.14.450(5); and WHEREAS, demand for criminal justice and public safety services continues to increase due to increased traffic, growth, and development pressures that have overburdened the County Jail, as well as other Franklin County facilities and services, hereby necessitating services expansion, facilities improvement and addition; and WHEREAS, County property taxes are limited to a maximum annual growth rate of one (1) percent or the Implicit Price Deflator(IPD), whichever is lower. In conjunction, the Countys costs for staff, personnel benefits, and operations have increased at a rate higher than the local consumer price index. Funds available to the County have decreased while the cost of providing services has increased resulting in the County being unable to generate sufficient revenue to ensure citizen safety and adequately serve an increasing population; and Franklin County Resolution Number 2011-281 Page 1 of 4 WHEREAS, the 2003 Washington State Leglsiature noted that local governments are presented with significant challenges in funding criminal justice services, and hence provided a legal means by which Counties and Cities could seek focal revenues to better protect the health, safety, and wetfare of its residents. Said legal means came through the enactment of RCW 82.14.450 authorizing the Franklin County legislative authority to submit a proposition to voters at a primary or general election that would authorize sales and use tax at the rate of three-tenths of one percent (0.003) to be collected throughout Franklin County. Said law requires one-third of such revenue collected be used for "criminal justice purposes,"including"...the construction, improvement, and expansion of' existing Franklin County Jail, E- 911 Dispatch, Sheriffs Department, and related facilities. RCW 82.14.450(5); RCW 82.14.340(5). All improvements and new construction shall be"basic design;"and WHEREAS, the expansion, improvement, operation, and maintenance of the County Jail would relieve jail overcrowding therein and amounts to a proper use of revenue for "criminal justice purposes" per RCW 82.14.450(5); and WHEREAS, other public purposes would be accomplished through expansion, improvement, operation, and maintenance of other county offices, departments, and facilities used by or providing ancillary services to the County Jail; and WHEREAS, Washington State Law requires the revenue received under this proposal to be shared with sixty(60) percent retained by the County, and the remaining forty (40) percent to be retained and distributed on a per capita basis to the Cities therein and the estimated collection for the County's 60% portion is approximately $1.7 million per year and the estimated collection for the Cities is approximately$1.1 million to be distributed on a per capita basis. WHEREAS, Washington Stale Law requires for the passage of this proposal a majority of fifty percent (50%) +1, of persons voting at a primary or general election must approve. The next general election is November 8,2011; and WHEREAS, Franklin County will conduct a county wide mail-in ballot election at the next general election on November 8,2011; and WHEREAS, if the voters approve this proposal on November 8, 2011, the additional sales and use lax will be collected beginning on January 1, 2012, and jurisdictions will begin receiving revenue in February 2012;and WHEREAS, interest rates are at historic lows, allowing substantial savings on a 30-year bond and construction costs are estimated 15 to 18 percent lower than recent years; and WHEREAS, it is the judgment of this Board that the citizens of Franklin County should be offered the opportunity to accept or reject a special tax levy of this kind; and WHEREAS, if approved, the special tax should be levied beginning in 2012 with three-tenths of one percent (0.003)of said tax to be collected for a period of thirty years; now therefore, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY that a county wide mail-in ballot election be held on November 8, 2011, for the purpose of submitting to the affected voters the determination of whether or not to authorize a sales and use tax at the rate of three-tenths of one percent (0.003)for thirty years to be levied beginning in 2012 in the absence of further action by the voters and the proceeds to be shared pursuant to RCW 82.14.450 by the County and Cities therein for the aforementioned purposes; and Franklin County Resolution Number 2011-281 Page 2 of 4 IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Franklin County Auditor is hereby requested to place a proposition on the November 8,2011 ballot in substantially the following form: PROPOSITION NO. 1 FRANKLIN COUNTY COUNTY AND CITIES' CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY TAX 'The Board of Franklin County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 2011- concerning a proposition for a county and cities' criminal justice sales and use tax. This proposition would authortze the sales and use tax in Franklin County and cities therein be increased three4enths of one percent (0.003) fo thsty years to improve public safety, including criminal gang suppression, and to expand, operate, and maintain the County jail, Pasco Municipal Courts, and the Pasco Police Department, and in support of other criminal justice and public safety purposes.Should this proposition be approved? Yes.........................❑ No.......................❑" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Franklin County recognizes any resolutions from Cities therein urging support of the local option sales and use tax, which revenue would be allocated pursuant to Chapter 82.14 RC1N, with sixty percent going to the County. The remaining forty percent of the revenue shall go to the Cities therein on a per capita basis. The revenue allocation to the Cities for each subsequent year shall be calculated using the final, official June 30th population figures published by the Office of Financial Management; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Board is directed to provide a copy of this resolution to the Franklin County Auditor, and each City therein In Franklin County. Done this /0 day of August, 2011. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FRANKLI LINTY, ASHINGTON Robert E Knch, Chairpers Rick Miller, Chair Pro Tern Brad Peck, Member ATTEST: ,� Clerk of t�Board Franklin County Resolution Number 2011-281 Page 3 of 4 A. 1 [7 y �,l� •, 1, L�. co NI r� M1CMI1t,161_ ti rr MEMORANDUM Bob Metzger, Police Chief TO: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager FROM : Bob Metzger, Police Chief RE: Street Crimes unit DATE: 12-21-2011 Our concept for this unit is as follows: Composition: 1 — Sergeant 3 —Patrol Officers Scope of work: This unit's main goal would be to go after street crime in the city of Pasco. Most street crime is committed by gangs so the emphasis would be with those groups or individuals that are committing crimes on a continuing basis in our community. This could be anything from graffiti to burglary to robbery, with the flexibility to quickly address crime trends and in-depth or serious public safety issues. This unit will work closely with our crime analyst to determine possible suspects. They will also work closely with investigators and patrol officers to determine what tactics they can use effectively and what assistance they can give to patrol to go after those who are committing targeted crimes. to addition this unit will work closely with area agencies and coordinate efforts as needed, This unit will work various hours depending on the need of the department and will be available on call for serious incidents where quick apprehension of suspect(s) is needed, They will be primarily in plain clothes, though on occasion may need to wear a uniform. They will be assigned a Sergeant and will work under the 1SD Captain. Selection for these positions will be based on not only interest but ability to do the job. Like all other positions other than patrol, these officers will be assigned to this on a rotating basis and will remain in the unit as long as they are productive. Other considerations: Training— Officers assigned to this unit will receive training as needed. Depending on the officers selected to this unit and what their skills are, training will be tailored to ft what the individual needs. Most officers that will be selected for this unit will have the basic skills to perform this job and will need minimal time to get prepared to go out into the field. Any specialized training will be done as it becomes available. I-low soon can we begin this— currently we have 2 officers in field training and three in the academy, We are also in the process of hiring to officers to replace retirements and resignations. We then need to promote one sergeant and hire an additional 4 officers to replace those that will be put into this unit. Once hired they either have to go through a 15 week FTO (if lateral hire) or we have to send them to the academy and then conduct the FTO training. This entire process can take up to b months from the time we hire to the time we have them ready to work alone on the road. If we begin the hiring process the first of the year, we would plan to have this unit up and running by fall of 2012, depending on hiring and training. At the latest we would have this up and running by the end of the year. How long to get this up and running—once we get the required staffing, we can put the positions out for bid to current officers. Once the selection is complete and the equipment is in place, they will be ready to go. If we plan to get the equipment before the staffing is done, this new unit can be ready as soon as officers are selected_ Unlike new officer hires, this unit will not need much if any time to train for what they are going to do. Summary: Once this unit is approved, we will begin the hiring and promotion process to replace those who are being put into this unit. Once we have the additional staff hired we will put this unit in place. If you have additional questions or need further information please let me know. Respectfully submitted, Robert Metzger Police Chief TENTATIVE PUBLIC SAFETY SALES TAX ALLOCATION I SCHEDULE Gang Unit Municipal Court Facility Police Station Year Sales Tax Sales Tax CIF Sales Tax CIF/GF 2012 300 300 2013 400 600 300 2014 400 600 300 2015 400 600 300 2016 400 700* 300 2017 400 700* 300 * Assumes 10% growth in sales tax share over 5 years (2%/yr). AGENDA REPORT NO. 23 FOR: City Council January 11, 2012 TO: Gary Crutchfie = anager FROM; Ahmad Qayoui i, Public Works Direct++-- Regular Mtg.: 1/17/12 SUBJECT: Purchase of Turbine Blowers for W WTP Optimization Improvements Project I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Proposal II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/17: MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the Purchase of Turbine Blowers for the Wastewater Treatment PIant (W WTP) Optimization Improvements Project, #C3-10-51-S"A'R to Sulzer/ABS, in the amount of$272,910.59 including sales tax, and further, authorize the Mayor to sign the contract documents. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Sewer Utility Fund - $161,441.27 IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The City received a grant from the BPA and Franklin County PUD in the amount of $111,469.32 for using Iow energy consumption high output equipment at the wastewater treatment plant. This will replace high energy consumption blowers with low maintenance and low energy consumption blowers. B) The optimization and upgrades are part of the Department of Ecology permitting requirements and improvement findings of the engineering study by HDR to develop optimization plans. V. DISCUSSION: A. On January 10,2012 staff received one(1) bid for Purchase of Turbine Blowers for the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Optimization Improvements Project, #C3-10-51-SWR. The bid was received from Sulzer/ABS in the amount of$272,910.59 including sales tax. 10(b) INVITATION TO BID RECEIPT OF BIDS Notice is hereby given that bids will be received by the City of Pasco, until 2:00 PM local time on January 10, 2012, for the purchase of two turbine blowers.Bid proposals will be received at the Wastewater Treatment Plant,at 1015 S Grey Avenue,Pasco, WA 99301. Bids may be faxed to (509) 544-3083 or emailed to Reuel Klempel at k,ImDel '.z�.rzasco W .p't7V ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID Was advertised in the Tri-City Herald January 1,2012 TYPE OF BID Bid shall be on a firm lump sum basis. DOCUMENT EXAMINATION AND PROCUREMENTS Copies of the Bidding and Contract Documents will be available on compact disc only and may be purchased from the Issuing Office which is the City of Pasco Department of Public Works Office as listed above.Contract Documents may be viewed on the City's website at: har.,"Li'LVLVarasco-�r oyi ids.as . OWNER'S RIGHT TO REJECT BIDS City of Pasco reserves the right to waive Irregularities and to reject bids. SPECIFICATIONS Must meet specifications as outlined in the contract documents for the wastewater treatment plant improvement project in section 1 1102 HIGH SPEED TURBO AERATION BLOWER. Sales and Use Taxes The amount of tax reported and paid by the successful Bidder to the Washington State Department of Revenue due to any and all payments made to the successful Bidder for equipment provided under this contract shall be coded to the City of Pasco under tax code location 1104. Specification No. and Manufacturer Manufacturer's Equipment Description Cost 11102- High Speed Turbine Sulzer/ABS Blower for 2 two $ 251,995.00 Sales Tax 8,3% $ 20,91 .59 Total $ 272,910.59 Witness Testing Per person, sales tax $ 6,498.00 included DELIVERY DATE Need to have equipment on site by May 25, 2012. Provide delivery date May 25, 2012 Bid Submittal This Bid is submitted an January 10, 2012 by the entity named below. B Sulzer]ABS (Corporation name) By Ben"amin Wells f •�. ^�_ �` (Name of person authorized to sign) Business Development Mana r Western Region (Title) Business address: 140 Pond View Drive. W60en,.CT_06450