Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2009.10.12 Council Workshop Packet
AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. October 12,2009 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance. 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) Water Comprehensive Plan Public Information Meeting: 1. Agenda Report from Doyle Heath, Utility Engineer dated October 7, 2009. 2. Summary of Pasco's Water System (Copy of full Plan available for viewing in the City Manager's office). 3. Proposed Current and Future Distribution System Improvements Map (b) 2010-2014 Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan: I. Agenda Report from Angela Pitman, Block Grant Administrator dated October 7, 2009. 2. Consultant Report,Tri-Cities Consolidated Planning Stakeholders Forums, June 23, 2009. 3. Draft 2010-2014 Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan (Council packets only; copy available for public review in the Planning office, the Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at http://www.pasco-wa.gov/generalinfo/citycouncilreports). 4. Map of Low/Moderate Income Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204. 5. Resolution. (c) Golf Cart Shed Rental Fees: 1. Agenda Report from Rick Terway, Administrative & Community Services Director dated October 8, 2009. 2. Proposed Resolution. 5. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) (b) (c) 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (a) (b) (c) 7. AD.IOVRNMENT REMINDERS: 1. 12:00 p.m., Monday, October 12, Pasco Red Lion — Pasco Chamber of Commerce Membership Luncheon. ("Making our State More Competitive for Small Business"; presented by Carl Gipson, Director of the Center for Small Business) 2. 6:30 p.m., Monday, October 12, Conference Room #1 Old Fire Pension Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MATT WATKINS,Rep.; MAYOR JOYCE OLSON, Alt.) 3. 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, October 13, Senior Center -- Senior Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN, Rep.; BOB HOFFMANN, Alt.) 4. 12:00 p.m., Thursday, October 15, 515 W.Clark Street--Pasco Downtown Development Association Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; MATT WATKINS, Alt.) 5. 3:30 p.m., Thursday, October 15, 502 Boeing Street — Franklin County Emergency Management Meeting. (MAYOR JOYCE OLSON) 6. 11:30 a.m., Friday, October 16, Sandberg Event Center— Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN, Rep.; BOB HOFFMANN, Alt.) AGENDA REPORT NO. 32 FOR: City Council October 7, 2009 TO: Gary Crutchfiel �t anager Robert J. Albert Works Director FROM: Doyle L Heath, Utility Engineergej Workshop Mtg.: 10/12/09 SUBJECT: Water Comprehensive Plan Public Information Meeting I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Summary of Pasco's Water System (Copy of full Plan available for viewing at City Manager's Office) 2. Proposed Current and Future Distribution System Improvements map H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 10/12: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The City is required every six (6) years to update and submit the Comprehensive Water System Plan (Plan) to the Washington State Department of Health (WSDOH) for approval. The last Plan was dated June 2001. Because of the Quad Cities Water Right requirements, the WSDOH and the Washington State Department of Ecology agreed that the four Cities needed to submit their Plans at about the same time with 2009 being the target year. CH2M Hill was hired to develop the Plan for the City of Pasco. V. DISCUSSION: A) Anthony Krutsch of CH2M Hill will make a presentation on the Plan. This item was also advertised as a Public Information Meeting on the proposed Water Comprehensive Plan. B) The Plan provides for the Water Utility through the year 2027. Long term planning should be reviewed and periodically updated to incorporate changes in population, land use regulations, and other data. Preparation of this Plan is a mandatory requirement of the WSDOH. The Plan is required to address the following elements: 1. Description of the water system 2. Basic planning data 3. System analysis 4. Water resource analysis 5. Source water protection 6. Operation and Maintenance program 7. Six-year capital improvement schedule 8. Financial program 9. Other documents. C) During the six year period covered by this Plan, the City would invest in capital improvements over the next 20 years. The 20 year improvements include those necessary to accommodate growth within the planning area, and those which will be required by the utility irrespective of growth, in continuing to provide a safe, reliable and cost-effective domestic water system. Developers will generally finance those future improvements directly related to growth. The possibility and extent of the City's participation would be determined on a case-by-case basis as development occurs. D) The attached Summary of Pasco's Water System includes a table on Page 4 that is the City of Pasco Immediate (6 years) System Improvements. (The map numbers in red relate to the improvements in the table). E) The Plan will be presented before the City Council for a Public Hearing and adoption at a later time. 4(a) SUMMARY Summary of Pasco's Water System S.1 Introduction This report provides an updated plan for the Water Utility through the year 2027. Long tQrm planning should be reviewed and periodically updated to incorporate changes in population,land use regulations, and other data.The City of Pasco last updated their Comprehensive Water System Plan in 2001. Over the past 50 to 60 years, the laws, regulations, and requirements of both the federal and state government, relating to public health,have increased significantly. During this period, it has been and remains the responsibility of local government to protect the public health, public safety,and public welfare of the citizens which they serve. In the State of Washington, the state legislature is responsible for the adoption of laws which have a direct impact on the daily lives of the citizens of the state. The Revised Code of Washington (RCW) sets forth these laws. The primary law of the state relating to water systems is RCW 70.119A,or commonly referred to as the Safe Drinking Water Act of the State of Washington, Once a law (RCW) has been adopted by the state legislature, the rules, regulations, and requirements for implementation are developed by the specific agency considered to have jurisdiction. These rules,regulations,and requirements are identified as Washington Administrative Code (WAC). For water supply and distribution systems,both the Washington Department of Ecology (Ih'DOE),and the Washington Department of Health (WDOH), have developed rules, regulations,and requirements. On an annual basis,many Qf the WAC's are revised, modified,changed,corrected, or added to;to reflect changes in federal and/or state law; to reflect the opinion of WDOE and/or WDOH;to respond to either known or perceived concerns with existing WAC's; or reflect the opinion of specific interest groups. The preparation of this Comprehensive Water System Plan for the City of Pasco is a Mandatory requirement of the WDOH under the provisions of WAC 246-290,Public Water Supplies. The WDOH approval of the City's Water Comprehensive PIan is effective for b years from the date of written approval unless: 1. Major projects subject to SEPA are proposed that are not addressed in the plan. 2. Changes occur in the basic planning data significantly affecting system improvements. 3. WDOI-I requests an updated plan or plan amendment. CITY of PASCO _ 'PAGE 1 CH2M HILL WATER PLAN SEPTEMBER 2009 r Regardless of the need to update or prepare the Comprehensive Water System Plan, the Plan update is Mandatory at least every six years.The Comprehensive Water System Plan is required to address the following elements for a period of at least 20 years into the future. 1. Description of the water system. Ownership and management. System history and background. Related plans (coordinated water system; Iand use;ground water management; and watershed basin). Service area map,characteristics,agreements, and policies. Basic planning data Current population, service connections,'water use, and equivalent residential units. Projected land use, future population,and eater demand for a six-year and twenty- year period. 3. System.analysis System design standards. - Water quality analysis. System inventory description and analysis. Summary of system deficiencies. -l. Water resource analysis Conservation program including conservation oriented rate structure, - 'Water demand forecasts. Water use data collection. - Source of supply analysis including alternate supplies if water rights are needed within 20 years. Water shortage response plan. lVater rights assessment. 'Water supply reliability analysis. Interties. 5. Source water protection - Specifically related to ground water supply. h. Operation and Maintenance program -7. Six-year capital improvement schedule CH2M HLL PAGE 2 CITY OF PASCO SEPTEMBER 2009 WATER PLAN 8. Financial program Summary of past income and expenses. -- One-year balanced operational budget. - Collection plan for maintaining cash flow stability for capital improvements and emergencies. - A rate structure that considers affordability and encourages water conservation. 9. Other documents SEPA compliance. Agreements. Comments from County and adjacent utilities. s Standard specifications. Design and construction standards. S.2 Plan Recommendations During the six-year period for which this Comprehensive Water System Plan will apple, the Citv of Pasco would invest approximately $28,560,000 in the water treatment and water distribution system to meet both regulatory requirements,and to provide for system expansion within the service area. Approximately 515,750,000 of these capital improvements are associated with the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant of which approximately $10,000,000 will be spent in 2009. The Comprehensive Water System Plan recommends a total of approximately$47,360,000 be invested in capital improvements to the Water Utility over the next 20 years,including the West Pasco Water Treatment Plant.Twenty-year improvements proposed include those necessary to accommodate growth within the planning area, and those which will be required by the utility, irrespective of growth, in continuing to provide a safe, reliable and cost-effective domestic water system. Developers will generally finance those future improvements which are directly related to growth, with the possibility of some cost sharing by the City of Pasco.The extent of the City's participation would be determined on a case-by-case basis as development occurs. The following sections of this Summary identify those improvements,which are anticipated to be made by the City of Pasco during the next six years. Anticipated improvements for years seven through twenty of the planning period are also identified. This Summary concludes with a listing of policy recommendations,which complement the continuing operations of the Water Utility. The following improvements to the Water li tility are required to meet current operational requirements,state and federal regulatory requirements,and to plan for those improvements which will be needed during the next six years. CITY OF PASCO PAGE 3 CH2M HILL WATER PLAN SEPTEMBER 2009 TABLE S-1 City of Pasco Immediate System Improvements Impr. No. Project Total Capital Cost Treatment SWT-1 Butterfield WFP fmprovements/Upgrade to restore 30 MGD capacity $ 1,600,000 SWT-3 Phase 1 —6 MGD $15,750,0002 Subtotal Treatment $17,350,000 Reservoir/Storage None Subtotal Reservoir/Storage $ 0 Booster Station T B.S.-1 1 Upgrade Broadmoor B.S. (including Emergency Power) $ 600,000 B S.-2 1 Upgrade East Side B.S. (including Emergency Power) $ 500,000 Subtotal Booster Station $ 1,100,000 Distribution System WM-1 1 Wernett—12"Waterline $ 600,000 WM-1 2 Cable Bridge Intete with Kennewick° $3,500,000 WM-2.1 East Airport 16"Waterline/Port of Pasco $ 400,000 WM-2.2 Road 68 Waterline Loop $ 500,000 WM-3 1 Commercial 16"Waterline Extension $ 250,000 WM-3.z 16"Waterline Loop-Broadmoor Blvd $ 700,000 WM-3.3 Road 100 Corridor North $ 1,040,000 WM-M.i Water Meter Replacement Project $ 840,000 WM-M.2 Misc.Water Improvements $ 480,000 WM-M.3 Water Distribution Line Extensions $ 1,800,000 Subtotal Distribution System $10,110,000 Total Immediate Improvements $28,560,000 3Approximately$10,000,000 of the capital costs expended in 2009 'Currently unfunded capital cost S.2.1 Desired Improvements (Yr 7 through Yr 20) Other improvements to the Water Utility,as described in this Comprehensive Water System Plan, are anticipated to cost$$18,800,000 between the seventh and twentieth year of the plaiming period.These projects, as well as portions of those projects constructed in the 6- year planning period, would be required to meet anticipated growth within the planning area and would generally be financed by developers with the possibility of some cost participation by the City of Pasco. S.2.2 Policy Recommendations In addition to capital improvements, this Water Comprehensive Plan makes certain recommendations for implementation of management and operations policy. Critical issues include: Participate in state and local Water Resource activities to assure early identification of critical issues impacting the City of Pasco. • Continue the program to identify and repair existing Ieaks in the water distribution system. o Maintain a water audit program of water production and water consumption. CH2M HILL 4 CITY OF PASCO SEPTEMBER 2009 WATER PLAN a w � R � v c tia ID LL CL n� m55 $ c2 2 2 ccL' 8S $. B 9p ny3 ,a wa 3opEndvbwn °v � aaauX: ® � ® flillll l ©101 � 111 uLO3 s� a f � f Sr � � f € Tr- Nil}. i� P _ 1 f[ I a M 4p �c AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 7, 2009 TO: Gary Crutchl'ieId, City r Z. Workshop Mtg.. 10/12/09 Rick White, Regular Mtg.. 10/19/09 Community& Ecoi'r'om'is Development Director FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator SUBJECT: Draft 2010-2014 Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan I. REFERENCE(S): L Consultant Report Tri-Cities Consolidated Planning Stakeholders Forums June 23, 2009. 2. Draft 2010-2014 Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan (Council packets only; copy available for public review in the Planning office, the Pasco Library or on the city's webpage at http://www.pasco-wa.gov/generalinfo/citycol[ncilreports). 3. Map of low/moderate income census tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204. 4. Resolution approving the 2010—2014 Consolidated Plan. II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL./ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 10/12: DISCUSSION 10/19: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , approving the 2010-2014 Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan. III. FISCAL IMPACT: $5 Million in Federal CDBG and HOME funds estimated over the 5-year period. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. The present Tri-Cities Home Consortium Consolidated Plan for the Cities of Kennewick, Pasco and Richland will expire on December 31, 2009. The submission of an updated Consolidated Plan is required at least once every five years and must be approved by HUD. In this cycle, the Consolidated Plan must be submitted to HUD by November 16"', 2009. B. Public forums were held by the Home Consortium's consultant on June 23, 2009 wherein the public was invited to provide input in three categories: economic development/community infrastructure; public services/human services; special needs and housing. Comments and public testimony are summarized in the Consultant Report Tri-Cities Consolidated Planning Stakeholders Foruums .lime 23, 2009 attached. C. Research by the consultant on the City's needs and resources was conducted during the period of May-July to provide a base for decision making. This included surveys of the physical condition of neighborhoods, collecting current statistical information on housing and economic conditions and personal interviews of key individuals and organizations (City Manager, Pasco Downtown Development Association, Hispanic Chamber and the Housing Authority). D. The Draft Plan is essentially a revision of the existing 2005- 2009 Consolidated Plan. The needs inventory of 2005 —2009 has been revised as has the various data that support the inventory. The Draft Plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission at the Commission meeting of September 17`x', 2009. 4(b) V. DISCUSSION: A. The Consolidated Plan is a blueprint for CDBG and HOME funded activities for' the years 2010 through 2014. In addition, all third party activities, such as development of assisted housing, must be consistent with the overall intent of the Plan. The Plan's focus is to establish priorities for funding programs for the year 2010 and beyond, and to design flexibility in the process to accommodate the City's discretion to use funds where those funds are best used. All HUD assisted projects must be consistent with the Goals contained in the Plan. B. The Draft Plan Goals and Strategies are very similar to those existing in the current Plan, though they have been revised to reflect additional opportunities for use of funds in the next 5 years. Although federal funds can be applied for eligible projects in all of Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204; staff recommends that language be added to the Consolidated Plan that establishes priorities for infrastructure improvements not only in the Museum and Longfellow neighborhoods, but those neighborhoods north of Downtown, west of the Civic Center and south of US 395. Consultant Report TO Cities Consolidated Planning Stakeholders Forums June 23, 2009 Kennewick City Hall Council Chambers Three forums and public hearings were held on Tuesday, June 23, 2009, as part of the Tri Cities consolidated planning process leading to the 2010-2014 Consolidated Plan. Each forum addressed a different topic of focus, and each forum was concluded with a public hearing inviting testimony from those present. In addition, a one hour public hearing was offered at the end of the day from 3:00-4:00 PM for people to offer testimony on any aspect of the consolidated planning process, and to recommend consideration of any housing and community development activities. More than 150 individual notices were sent to community stakeholders, and a notice for all Tri Cities residents was published in the Tri-City Herald and La Voz Hispanic newspapers 20 days in advance of the forums. The list of invitees is attached. The forums were facilitated by Trish Roberts, a consultant from Common Ground under contract with John Epler,Associates. Each of the three forums followed the same format. The consultant offered an overview of the consolidated planning process and timeline, shared information about activities funded under the current Consolidated Plan, and distributed tables with updated data related to: population, income and employment, and housing stock. The consultant then led a discussion among the participants about implications of the data, housing and community development needs in each of the three cities, and potential projects that would address needs and be good uses of anticipated federal housing and community development dollars. Five staff people from the three cities took part in the forums: Carol Hughes Evans City of Kennewick Deborah Biuher City of Richland Michelle Burden City of Richland Joe Schiessl City of Richland Angie Pitman City of Pasco Lists of forum participants and notes from each forum are shown below. Forum #1, 8:30— 10:00 AM Topic: Economic Development and Community Infrastructure 1 � Participants: Dave Watrous SEC Affordable Housing Candice Bluechel Work Source Gloria Garcia PDDA Jeff Adams City of Pasco Victoria Silvernail Pasco Specialty Kitchen Bill Fattic HUD, Spokane Comments shared by participants: • Economic stimulus dollars allocated to the Tri Cities will mean continued contracts at the Hanford site. Such contracts lead to short-term, increased housing demand, especially for rental units, and entry level units for purchase. • Hanford related jobs are diversifying, and jobs across the board are diversifying. • There is a shortage of seasonal agricultural workers. This is caused by several factors including tightened immigration rules following 911, and changes in crop volumes and timing. The shortage in workers affects farmers' plans for subsequent years, and the change in farmers' plans affects availability of seasonal agricultural workers. • The decrease in seasonal agricultural workers dramatically affects the economic health of downtown Pasco, and also to a lesser degree affects the economic health of the whole Tri Cities area. • Potential economic development and infrastructure projects include: • Projects to retain residents in the 20 year—30 year old age group; especially projects which offer attractive recreation to this age group. Examples include recreation sites, parks, and entertainment venues. • Projects that increase and support tourism such as assistance and promotion for wineries, and further enhancement of the river shores. Efforts which help provide middle income jobs. Hanford contracts bring many high income jobs, agricultural related work offers many unskilled jobs, but it is the middle income jobs that need to be increased. o Child care is needed, especially for swing shift and graveyard shift workers. o Formation of an LID in conjunction with a BID would be very beneficial to Pasco. It would require a partnership among business owners, building owners, and the City and could be a mechanism to upgrade Pasco downtown. o A carrot and stick approach involving code enforcement and lower interest financing could accomplish the needed building infrastructure improvements in downtown Pasco. o A "soft-step" is needed for businesses coming out of the Pasco incubator kitchen as they transition into established businesses. o After school education and recreation programs for 6th grade—8th grade students would help eliminate graffiti and mischief in the business districts. Public Testimony Given at the End of Session#1 Victoria Silvernail, Pasco Specialty Kitchen, spoke in support of continued funding for the Specialty Kitchen. Ms Silvernail commented on the variety of ways the kitchen stimulates and stabilizes downtown Pasco, in addition to assisting the individual small business people who use the incubator facility. Ms Silvernail provided several specific success stories of fledgling businesses that have left the incubator kitchen and gone out on their own to establish successful stand-alone establishments, and she talked of the active group currently using the Specialty Kitchen. Forum#2, 10:30 AM—12:30 PM Topic: Public and Human Services, and Special Needs Participants: Robin Callow BFDHS Judith A Gidley BFCAC Ray Morrison Consumer Rachelle Brunsdon Lutheran Community Services Kim Pennala PPD Toni Neidhold ESD 123 Gordon Bopp NAMI-WA Carol Stape Elijah Family Homes Cricket Cordova BFCAC Bill Fattic HUD Spokane Steve Gaulke Vets Edge Bobbie Littrell HACPFC Comments shared by participants: • Consolidation of mental health services across the Tri Cities would benefit the consumers and increase the efficiency of delivery. • Housing options are needed for people with co-occurring disorders, esp. if mental illness is co-occurring with substance abuse. • Outreach is complex and a very important aspect of providing services to people with mental illness. Successful models include: • Peer support • Participant run programs • Support services, including case management, are a critical component of housing for people with mental illness. • Services and housing are needed for people with HIV/AIDS, including women. • Programs are needed for farm workers. • Under law passed by the Washington Legislature, 13 cities in Washington have adopted an increase in local sales tax to fund mental health programs. An effort should be launched in the TO Cities to do the same. The increased tax could result in a net savings. Supportive programs, especially a consolidated crisis control center, could provide assistance early and prevent the need for the later phase, expensive intervention by law officers and hospital emergency rooms. • The success of supportive housing efforts can be enhanced by the funding of a housing liaison to act between the consumer and the landlord. Public Testimony Given at the End of Session#2 Kim Pennala, Pasco Police Department, spoke in support of developing a domestic violence shelter in Pasco. The shelter's whereabouts would be known by the public, accessible 24 hours a day to people seeking help, and be run in close coordination with the Pasco Police Department and social services agencies. Forum #3, 1:30—3:00 PM Topic: Housing Participants: Bobbie Littrell HACPFC Rich Barchet SEK Affordable Housing Theresa Richardson Habitat for Humanity Peggy Brudmiller CBC Bill Casey CBC Bibbie William Tri Cities Chaplaincy Liza Beam CCCS Judith A Gidley BFCAC Cricket Cordova BFCAC Gordon Bopp NAMi-WA .Anna (Nan) Bopp NAM TriCities 4 Barbara Puigh Elijah Family Homes Toni Neidhold ESD 123 Mark Lee VYC and PPCW Debbie Curtis ERA Sun River Robin Callow BFDHS Ingrid Stegemuellen TC Herald Renee Pahlgren Home Builders' Association Bobbie Littrell HACPFC Comments shared by participants: • There are virtually no standard housing units available for households with incomes 30% of median, or less. • It is important to seek and analyze statistics related to disabled people, including adult disabled people living with their parents. There is a baby boom bulge in the demographics for this population, and for the parents of this population, as in other populations. This presents implications for housing needs. • The federal 811 capital grant program is an important source of funds for developing housing units for people with disabilities. There exists a policy conflict between the -federal 811 housing program and the Washington State DSHS programs. While 811 funded projects only become financially feasible with approximately 12 units or more, State DSHS policy calls for a much lower concentration of consumers. • There is a need for housing units for people with both physical and mental disabilities. • Currently, housing authority units are the only accessible units for people with physical disabilities, and there is a waiting list of more than a year for these units. In addition, dollars to housing authorities are continuing to be reduced. • Potential housing projects to be considered for the new Consolidated Plan include: • Housing and shelter for homeless youth with supportive counseling and education • Group homes for disabled mentally ill • Shelter beds for all populations, and especially for families with children • Housing for agricultural workers • Housing with services for people with HIV/AIDS • A safe house for victims of domestic violence; open to the community • Assisted living units for elderly • Affordable elder housing • Rental assistance for people with very low incomes o Special needs housing for people who are not eauthority units, sits, such as people with substance abuse problems,g out of jails and prisons Public Testimony Given at the End of Session#3 Mark Lee, VYC and PPCW, spoke in support of programs and loss youth. He told of dealing with many youth who find shelter by couch suomes of friends, having no permanent base. He explained that many c become homeless after leaving homes of abuse. He voiced support shsnt housing coupled with the support of counseling and education. Public Testimony, and Open Microphone, 3:00—4:00 PM No testimony was offered during this hour. Written Testimony Submitted in Response to the Consolidates Barb Carter C211esources, LLC Kennewick,WA I have been working for over a year now on concepts for an af-k space for artists that would incorporate standalone studio/teaching coromplex. During the Americans for the Arts Conference in Seattle last vtial working artist housing sites and gained real input from the artists so fEt track. The funding for these projects, as is most affordable housing, quitcally included d low income tax credits, HOME and CDBG funds, State Housingrivate. The most respected nationwide non-profit developer I talked with)etuity the affordability of the units,they would actually own and overse:he lack of local ►cal qualified CHDO for this type of project would not be an issue low income housing might be more tenable when tied to the educational/anent. The Seattle rep has done several there, is originally from Yakima ait there needs is to be a project like this on the east side that would serve regicinterested in incorporating it into their arts program as well. There is a definite need here so hope to include this type of PL Thanks. i .� �` a� E tn ID N J I � A - i r-rJ lz LU RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2010-2014 TRI-CITIES CONSOLIDATED PLAN FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAMS. WHEREAS, the Cities of Pasco, Richland and Kennewick have contracted for preparation of an update to the Consolidated Plan for the program years 2010 through 2014 which includes a detailed Strategic Action Plan developed from a needs assessment; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco has advertised and participated in four workshops and other outreach efforts to assess the community needs; and WHEREAS, interviews with key individuals and organizations in Pasco have been conducted as part of the needs assessment; and WHEREAS, the Consolidated Plan contains a Strategic Action Plan that outlines the areas the City will focus CDBG and HOME program funding; and WHEREAS, the City staff, Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed the Consolidated Plan and received a briefing regarding input and results of this effort; NOW THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That the 2010-2014 Tri-Cities Consolidated Plan for CDBG and HOME Programs is approved. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2009. CITY OF PASCO: Joyce Olson Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, CMC Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council October 8, 2009 TO: Gary Crutchfiel anager f"i Workshop Mtg.: 10/12/09 Regular Mtg.-: 10/19/09 FROM: Rick Terway, Administrative and Co i ervices Director SUBJECT: Golf Cart Shed Rental Fees I. REFERENCE(S): A. Proposed Resolution II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 10/12: Discussion 10/19: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. setting charges for golf cart storage shed rental at Sun Willows Golf Course. III. FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $11,800 General Fund Revenue. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The City maintains 118 rental sheds for golf cart storage at Sun Willows Golf Course. The annual rental rate, currently $350/yr., was last set in 2004. B) Over the last few years, the City has spent a fair amount of money repainting and re-roofing the sheds. We have also added new doors and locks. C) On site rental storage facilities are not overly common in the area; however, staff has found a comparison rental rate at a neighboring facility; Canyon Lakes: $450/yr. In addition when checking local storage facilities the monthly fees for a space similar in size was between $40 and $50 per month. This is equal to $480 to $600 per year. Staff recommends that the rates be raised from $350 to $450 per year in light of the market and the completed upgrades to the facility. D) There is a state leasehold excise tax that is applicable to these rentals when the annual rental amount exceeds $250 per year. The tax is 12.84%of which the state receives approximately 2/3 and the City 1/3, E) If Council concurs with this recommendation, passage of the attached resolution would be in order. 4(c) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION setting charges for golf cart storage shed rental at Sun Willows Golf Course. WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the charges for golf cart storage shed rental at Sun Willows Golf Course; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to set fees which are market-based while generating adequate revenue to cover the expenses associated with maintaining the golf course and storage sheds; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: SECTION 1: That the annual rental fee for golf cart storage sheds at Sun Willows Golf Course shall be set at $450.00 per year from and after December 31, 2009. SECTION 2: The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to implement the fee set forth hereinabove in accordance with this resolution. SECTION 3: The fee set forth herein supercedes any fees for such storage established by prior resolution of the City Council. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of 2009. Joyce Olson, Mayor ATTEST: Debra L. Clark, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lee Kerr, City Attorney