HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009.09.28 Council Special Meeting Packet AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
Special Meeting 7:00 p.m. September 28,2009
S. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
(a) Pledge of Allegiance.
3. BUSINESS ITEMS
(a) New Slides for Memorial Pool:
1. Agenda Report from Rick Terway, Administrative & Community Services Director
dated September 24, 2009.
2. Document from Whitewater.
MOTION: I move to authorize a change order for installation of a new double slide in
lieu of the old slide for the Memorial Pool renovation project.
4. ADJOURNMENT
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 24, 2009
TO: Gary Crutchfie "Manager
Special Meeting/
FROM: Rick Terway, Director Ad mi'' r�and Workshop Mtg.: 9/28/09
Community Services
SUBJECT: New Slides for Memorial Pool
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Attached document from Whitewater
H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
9/28: Discussion
9/28: MOTION: I move to authorize a change order for installation of a new
double slide in lieu of the old slide for the Memorial Pool renovation. project.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
$350,000
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The current slide at Memorial Pool is 12 plus years old with a manufacturer's life
expectancy of approximately 20 years under normal conditions. With the significant
amount of UV rays we experience in this area the life expectancy is somewhat
shortened. Estimates from the industry range from 2 to 4 years reduction in the life,
which leaves only approximately 4 — 5 years remaining before we would have to
make a major change. Staff believes it to be more economical to make the change
now, in conjunction with the remodel project.
B) It is estimated that the cost for a similar installation of the new slide in the future will
increase a minimum of 10 to 15 percent in 4 years. In addition, reconstruction,
retrofitting necessary to add a new slide to the current pool design would likely
increase the cost by between $70,000 and $85,000. In addition to the above
mentioned items, the new double slide would be a great new attraction to the facility
and may increase attendance and revenue.
C) The cost for the preferred new slides and installation is $280,000. The additional
deck, fencing and plumbing are estimated to cost $50,000, with engineering at
$20,000. A competing quote was received from Proslide for $294,000.00, which is
approximately a $14,000 increase from the Whitewater quote. However, this slide
also does not have some of the features that the preferred slide has such, as composite
panels and jel-coated flume.
D) The expected life of the Whitewater slide is 30 years. We may choose any color side
we wish,
3(a)
Full Service Innovator& Supplier to the Global Waterpark Industry WHITEWATER,.
6700 McMil)an Way,Richmond.BC.Canada V6W 1,17,Tel:604.273.1068,Fax:604.273.4518 www.whitewaterwest.com
SLIDE LENGTH HEIGHT FLUME
NAME (Ft) (Ft.) TYPE
A 191.6 22.8 AT
ENCLOSED BODY SLIDE
B 163.9 23,3 PS
\ OPEN BODY SLIDE
375. 0 \ ALIGN END OF WALL W
375. Z6 FACE OF BUILDING T
IT 0 W E R \ _ _ `\\ 3 _�0
T.O.PLATFORM ~
EL. 22.8 Ft. \\`
I p
! RUNOUT
T.O.DECK /
EL. 0.00 Ft. 375-79.iT
275. 77
I
t
376.
376. 3t] -47.L., 30 !__--
\\\ 376 45i
B
l REOUiRED WATER 11 I
DEPTH 3'-6"
II
N I I
! OUTLINE OF
I ` � MINIMUM I _
! ! LANDING AREA 1 "'
L---\
�— P O Cl L l
14'011, WATER LEVEL 1
EL. —of5 Ft. LE I SPRE POOL
f —SEEI P❑❑L DRAW 1 N -!
I ( I I
I ! II
I
! I
I 0 1D 20 30 SEA
1 i I
t Scale in Feet
1/16' - 1 root
PROJECT NAME
Wnlaw wrLS v,�..,ri:, NnusenlerV rYS Va+gal roI PASCO AQUATIC CENTER
w
. s
PASCO,WASHINGTON }
DRAWING TITLE DATE I
SLIDE PATH LAYOUT SEP 0912009
i
Pont Ptannou Fr.K•rn r;"'A'f nny Pro oci Mor n YN DRAWN MOOFl PROJECT
I
'r A.H. 16588B 16588
DESIGN SCALE SKETCH
y.. P.C. 1116"=1,_0" SK-2
This document is copyright and the proprietary information herein are the sole property of Whitswater West Industries Ltd.and may not be reproduced or distributed without prior consent of Whitewater West Industries Lid.
TM
t
I � �
by Whitewater
In the beginning,waterslides followed the standard of fiberglass
manufacturing. This involves hand-laid fabrication on a single sided open
mold. The mold produces a smooth surface on the interior,but the exterior
is rough,irregular,and dull as shown on the right. It also traps dirt easily,
which is a maintenance concern as well as an eye sore. The rough outside
surface is also prone to weathering and color fade. Slides built on open
molds also vary in thickness and uniformity and can result in poor joint
alignment and that can cause an uncomfortable ride.
.F t rrn In 2004 Whitewater introduced SilkTekTm,a revolutionary high-tech approach to
water slide manufacturing. It starts with brand new computer controlled laser cut
molds that produce 100%dimensionally accurate parts. Dimensional accuracy
E, combined with a higher level of uniformity and thickness results in water slide
joints you will never feel because they fit together perfectly. These two molds
are bolted together with mat reinforcement in the middle,and resin is drawn
through with a vacuum. Having both sides cure against the mold results in every
slide surface being smooth as silk! Boeing uses the same process for aircraft
composites.
a
Y
l �
(t
There truly is not an equal product on the market. No other waterslide is built this way. No other waterslide fits together
this way. The appearance is fantastic! You can actually see your reflection on the slide's surface. All of this comes
together to form the new waterslide revolution, SilkTek. Do not let your clients settle for inferior, out of date
technology... they deserve the best!
PERFECTLY SMOOTH JOINTS - SAFER AND SMOOTHER RIDE
EASY TO KEEP CLEAN - LOW MAINTENANCE
CONSISTANT THICKNESS - HIGHEST QUALITY
GREAT APPEARANCE
Call Whitewater at 1-$00-7-SLIDES
PS--ff ��
A�
r, Y
d
AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. September 28,2009
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance.
3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:
4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
(a) C-Curb on Burden Boulevard:
1. Agenda Report from Robert J. Alberts, Public Works Director dated September 24, 2009.
2. Vicinity Map.
3. Letter Agreement.
4. Reciprocal Access Agreement.
(b) Intersection Improvement Options at Road 68 and Court:
1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated September 23, 2009.
2. Intersection Option Exhibits.
(c) For Hire-Vehicles Licensing Requirements:
1. Agenda Report from Debbie Clark, City Clerk dated September 21,2009.
2. Proposed Ordinance.
(d) River Crossing Study:
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield,City Manager dated September 24, 2009.
2. Letter from BFCG to Mayor Olson dated 8/27/09 (2 pages).
3. Study Boundary Map.
(e) Land Use Permits, presented by WCIA Attorney, Ken Harper. (NO WRITTEN
MATERIAL ON AGENDA)
5. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
6, EXECUTIVE SESSION:
(a) Real Estate Sale/Acquisition
(b)
(c)
7. ADJOURNMENT
REMINDERS:
1. 4:00 p.m., Monday, September 28, Port of Benton — Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund
Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MATT WATKINS, Rep.; AL YENNEY,Alt.)
2. 6:00 p.m., Wednesday, September 30, Three Rivers Convention Center — AWC Regional Meeting.
(MAYOR JOYCE OLSON, COUNCILMEMBERS REBECCA FRANCIK, TOM LARSEN, MATT
WATKINS, and AL YENNEY)
3� 5:30 p.m., Thursday, October 1, Parks & Rec. Classroom -- Parks & Recreation Advisory Council
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER REBECCA FRANCIK, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.)
AGENDA REPORT NO. 30
FOR: City Council September 24, 2009
TO: Gary Crutchfield anager
FROM: Robert J. Alb e Works Director Workshop Mtg.: 09/28/09
SUBJECT: C-Curb on Burden Boulevard
I. REFERENCE(S):
1, Vicinity Map
2. Letter Agreement
3. Reciprocal Access Agreement
H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
09/28: Discussion
IIL FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Bruce Haldors of The TRANSPO Group outlined to Council on November 24,
2008 needed improvements in the Road 68 and Burden Boulevard Corridor. One
of the recommendations was to install C-Curb in Burden Boulevard to eliminate
the left turn movements to the Shell Station and Dugout Tavern. In 2008, this
entrance was the highest traffic accident location in the City. This topic was again
discussed at the January 26, 2009 meeting. Prior to making a decision on this
recommendation, staff was asked to evaluate options for the property owners.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Staff has held discussion with the property owners regarding having access into
the Yokes property. The discussions have resulted into an agreement between the
owners of the Yokes property, Pasco Association LLC, the owners of the Dugout
Tavern and Dr. Matt Herres' property. An access entrance would be built
between Yokes and Dr. Herres' property. Another entrance would be created
between the Dugout Tavern and Dr. Herres' property allowing both properties
access to and from the Yokes site. The improvements and agreement does not
include the Shell Station. The owners of the Yokes property were firm that only
one common access point would be acceptable. The access point selected had the
least impact on the properties in the agreement. Trying to provide access to the
Shell Station would have required additional parking spaces be eliminated from
the Dugout Tavern which would not be acceptable.
B) Staff concluded from the discussions with Council that the City would be willing
to assume some financial responsibility to find a solution. The proposed letter to
the property owners from the City Manager would commit the City to reimburse
the owners for the costs to make the improvements. The estimated cost is $6,000
to $10,000. Since the agreement with the owners of the Yokes property is a use
agreement, any party can terminate the agreement. The City's letter agreement
would also guarantee restoration of the sties if the agreement was terminated.
C) The property owners affected are in agreement. Staff recommends Council to
authorize the City Manager to execute the letter agreement. Staff also
recommends that following the installation of the access improvements, the
C-Curb in Burden Boulevard be installed.
4(a)
l n
if
1d NOUN 3AN00 .—a
W
�1{{tMlLth_•
fYJ RUl ht 4•t a ! 1 - _ I� -
y
I,
Lila. .
Z N1 RN3YO10
v
•I� I
- L,41�)
6B
JRO
1 •T 0 .. t
`Ikfl.tN1
tlA
Q1�t •�� al:. ��f r � r••• �•F.lj►/nt[E I
O � '• ,Si �aK �. . � 0 _mss__ ,. `riR[f1��,..1I
,Fttt[�' \; � 1 Ftt\F - ► J[ w J� .J .,y ^�, • ..K[�'[ pk� � p [1[�[tH'
t 911 'I,.l t•. 1tla�J I
ML
• p < I It �,
�� `v � •� ,3r ' fir♦_�i� ��k T��� -,Y A[J[a[-rr [ - _ 7
� SSA i, ��< � t�• -i�.. +n- r T
1.��,�...•�.._.-..�.�r•��.w�•.r.��r�.�••••..�r-•<•�.�r���•�����•..�•.���•.-•...�.-r�.-•..•-•..�.�r..•�.�r��.��r--��as������u ��..�-fit
• CITY MANAGER (509) 545-3404 / Fax (509) 545-3403
P.O. Box 293. (525 North 3rd Avenue) Pasco. Washington 99301 / www.pasco- +ii.gm
September 10, 2009
Jeffrey L. Tucksen
Poppi Raymen
PO Box 3167
Pasco WA 99301
Matt Herres
Michelle Herres
MGMO 4M, LLC
3006 Road 76
Pasco WA
RE: Burden Boulevard Improvements/Yokes Driveway Access
Dear Mr. Tucksen, Ms. Raymen, Mr. & Mrs. Herres:
The City of Pasco is installing a lane divider on Burden Blvd near its intersection with Road 68
for the purpose of reducing the number of traffic accidents occurring at that intersection. The
above property owners have asserted a claim that the barrier installed on Burden Blvd will limit
traffic access to their properties by eastbound traffic on Burden Blvd.
In full satisfaction of these claims, the City of Pasco has agreed to facilitate the agreement
between the affected property owners and the owner of the Yokes Market property immediately
north, for a driveway access linking their property as identified in the drawing and aerial
photograph attached to this letter as Exhibit A.
As further consideration for the full release of the property owner's potential claims against the
City resulting from the improvements to Burden Blvd, the City of Pasco shall reimburse the
property owners the actual reasonable costs (subject to prior cost approval by the City Engineer)
of the construction of a 22-foot driveway between the clinic property and the Yokes' property
including removal of the existing chain-link fence and landscaping, as well as installation of the
asphalt driveway to link the two parking lots.
In addition, the City will reimburse the property owners the actual costs of any curb cuts or other
transitions necessary (in the opinion of the City Engineer) for the 24-foot driveway between their
respective properties. In return, the property owners agree to maintain unobstructed a 24-foot
driveway between their properties in the location as designated on Attachment A.
Mr. Tucksen, Ms. Poppi Raymen
Mr. & Mrs. Herres
September 10, 2009
RE: Burden Boulevard Improvements/Yokes Driveway Access
Page 2
Contemporaneously with this Ietter agreement, a Reciprocal Access Agreement is being entered
into between the property owners and the owners of the Yokes' property. Each of the property
owners shall faithfully comply with the terms of that agreement which is wholly within their
control. The City will have no responsibility for the parties' compliance with that agreement,
nor its duration, nor shall termination revive any claim of the property owners regarding the
placement of the barrier on Burden Blvd nor negate this absolute release of any claims regarding
its placement.
In the event of termination of the Reciprocal Access Agreement, the City of Pasco shall
reimburse the property owners the actual reasonable cost of restoring the chain-link fence
between the clinic property and the Yokes Market property.
This letter agreement constitutes the full agreement between the City of Pasco and the property
owners and constitutes a full and complete release of any claims the property owners might have
against the City incident to the above-described improvements on Burden Blvd which shall
remain in place regardless of any subsequent modification or termination of the Reciprocal
Access Agreement or change in uses of the above properties.
Sincerely,
Gary Crutchfield
City Manager
GC/tlz
attachment
Acknowledgement of Receipt and Acceptance of the Terms of this Letter Agreement
Jeffrey L. Tucksen Date Popp] Raymen Date
Matt Herres Date Michelle Herres Date
WHEN RECORDED,PLEASE RETURN TO:
City of Pasco
525 North 3"'
Pasco WA 99301
RECIPROCAL ACCESS AGREEMENT
THIS RECIPROCAL ACCESS AGREEMENT is hereby made and entered
into this day of August, 2009, between PASCO ASSOCIATES, LLC, a
Washington Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as "Yokes"; MGMO
4M, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, hereinafter referred to as "Clinic";
and JEFFREY L. TUCKSEN and POPPIE RAYMEN, hereinafter referred to as
"Dugout" for the purpose of providing joint access to their adjacent properties for the
benefit of present and future owners.
IN CONSIDEREATION OF MUTUAL COVENANTS contained herein, it is
agreed as follows:
I Benefitted Properties.
A. Pasco Associates, LLC, is the owner of certain real property
described as follows:
That property generally known as "Yokes Market" at 4905 Road 68, and
more particularly described as follows:
Tax Parcel No, 116-160-053
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M., CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS-
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION, THENCE NORTH 89 043'48" WEST ALONG SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SECTION 591.15 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00°16'12"
Reciprocal Access Easement- I
EAST 685.63 FEET,THENCE NORTH 89°43'48"WEST 497.45 FEET
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGWNING;
THENCE SOUTH 00°14'12" WEST 184.69 FEET, THENCE NORTH
89043'12" WEST 125.18 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00-14'12" EAST
184.69 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89°43148" WEST 80.30 FEET,
THENCE SOUTH 14 000'33' EAST 421.01 FEET, THENCE SOUTH
89 043'48" EAST 599.09 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00-16'12" EAST
408.00 FEET, THENCE NORTH 89°43' 48" WEST 497.45 FEET TO
THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS,
RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS, AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD AND IN VIEW.
B. MGMO 4M, LLC,is the owner of certain real property described
as follows-
That property generally known as "Chiropractic Clinic", located at 7707
Burden Blvd, and more particularly described as follows:
Tax Parcel No. 116-160-025
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9,
TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M., CITY OF PASCO,
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
SECTION, THENCE NORTH 89°43'48" WEST ALONG SOUTH
LINE OF SAID SECTION 691.08 FEET, THENCE NORTH 00°16'12"
EAST 45.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE OF BURDEN RD., SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
THENCE NORTH 89°43'48" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE 100.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT
PARCEL DEPICTED AS LOT 2 OF BSP 98-07, RECORDS OF
FRANKIN COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 00 016'12" EAST ALONG
THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 OF BSP 98-07 A DISTANCE
OF 232,63 FEET TO A POINT ALONG ON THE NORTH LINE OF
THE SOUTH 277.63 FEET OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH
89 043'48"EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTH
277.63 FEET A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
00 016'12" WEST 232.63 FEET TO THE SAID TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING;
Reciprocal .Access Easement -2
ALSO KNOWN AS THE WESTERLY 100.00' OF LOT l OF
BINDING SITE PLAN NO. 98-07;
CONTAINING 23,263, SQ.FT,
TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT FOR
ACCESS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 89°43'48" EAST
ALONG THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF BURDEN
ROAD 2 0.0 0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°16'19" EAST 40.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°43'48" WEST 40.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
00 016'19" WEST 40.00 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID NORTHERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 89°43'48" EAST ALONG
SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY 20.00 FEET TO THE SAID
POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS,
RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS, AND RESTRICTIONS OF
RECORD AND IN VIEW.
C. Jeffrey L. Tucksen and Poppie Raymen are the owners of real
property described as follows:
That property generally known as the "Dugout", located at 7111 Burden
Blvd., and more particularly described as follows:
Tax Parcel No. 116-160-031
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH 277.63 FEET OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHP 9 NORTH,
RANGE 29 EAST, W.M., FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 9;
THENCE NORTH 89 043'48" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE
THEREOF 891.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTH 00 016'12" EAST 277.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
89 043'48" EAST 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°16'12" WEST
277.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 043'48" WEST 100.00 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 45 FEET THEREOF FOR CITY ROAD RIGHT
OF WAY.
Reciprocal Access Easement-3
2. Declaration of Reciprocal Driveway License. A Reciprocal Driveway
License is hereby created for the benefit of the parties and their successors in interest
and future owners of the above-described real properties, providing ingress and egress
by and between the above-described properties as designated in Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein as a part of this Agreement, consisting of:
A. A 22-foot access driveway between the Yokes property and the
Clinic property.
B. A 24-foot driveway access between the Clinic property and the
Dugout property.
The parties and their successors in interest shall, until revoked as provided
herein, have full right of privilege and authority to utilize the described driveway
accesses for ingress and egress and for all surface uses consistent therewith.
3. Parking Restriction. Nothing herein shall grant or be construed to grant
reciprocal parking rights to the owners, customers, or invitees of Clinic or Dugout upon
the Yokes property. No spill-over parking shall be permitted. Violation of this term
shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and may result in its termination as provided
below.
4. Construction of Improvements.
A. Dugout and Clinic shall provide and be solely responsible for the
costs of the installation of the improvements identified in Section 2 above,
including removal of the existing fencing and landscaping, and the construction
and paving of a level grade driveway access at such location in accordance with
the specifications of the City of Pasco as designated on Exhibit A. Yokes shall
have no responsibility for the reimbursement of any costs associated with such
improvements.
B. Dugout and Clinic shall remove any curbing or obstacle to the
driveway access between the Dugout property and the Clinic property including
the reconfiguration of parking designations consistent with the existence of the
driveway access as designated on Exhibit A.
5. Access Runs With the Land. This License shall be appurtenant to and
run with the above-described real property and shall be binding on all parties having or
acquiring any interest, title or right in the above-described real properties, or any part
thereof, unless terminated as provided below.
Reciprocal Access Easement-4
6. Termination. Any party may terminate this license upon advance 60-day
written notification of termination on the grounds that:
A. Within their sole discretion, a party determines that the mutual
access agreement in any way negatively affects the business or parking of the
party or creates a hazard.
B. An uncorrected violation of the terms of this Agreement
continues to exist thirty (30) days following written notice.
C. Upon termination, the fence removed pursuant to Section 4A
above shall be restored by, and at the sole expense, of the "Dugout" and the
"Clinic"within sixty (60) days of the termination date.
7. General Provisions. For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the
essence. Should any dispute arise concerning the enforcement, breach or interpretation
of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet in a good faith attempt to resolve the
dispute. Any unresolved dispute shall be resolved by binding arbitration pursuant to
RCW 7.04A, as amended, and the Mandatory Rules of Arbitration (MAR); venue shall
be placed in Franklin County, Washington, the laws of the State of Washington shall
apply, and the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs
as an additional award.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Reciprocal Access
Agreement by and through their authorized representatives on this day of
) 2009.
Reciprocal Access Easement z 5
`\\`o k%l I t I I I 1 I111/II/
J
PASCO ASSOCIATES, J�C �~ `:�O �SS►9�E���...
By , 'u �,OTARy
— � �' -
pUBt��
STATE OF WASHINGTON )' •.
COUNTY OF Franklin
On this � day of HfYt , 2009, before me, personally appeared
'Ihbmfts . 0'314 Mein bEf,-- of Pasco Associates, LLC, to me
known to be the in ivid a who ho executed the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses
and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunder set my hand and seal the day and
year first written above.
'YLt/?S'L
NOTARY PUBLI in and for the State of Washington
Residing at_ DV, PAC I U0
My Commission xpires: LA —q-2-01 Z
MGMO 4M, LLC
By:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF Franklin )
On this _ day of 2009, before me, personally appeared
of MGMO 4M, LLC, to me
known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses
and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunder set my hand and seal the day and
year first written above.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
Residing at _
My Commission Expires:
Reciprocal Access Easement-6
JEFFREY L. TUCKSEN
By:
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF Franklin )
On this day of 2009, before me, personally appeared
of , to me
known to be the individual who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged said instrument to be his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses
and purposes therein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunder set my hand and seal the day and
year first written above.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
Residing at
My Commission Expires:
Reciprocal Access Easement-7
PROPOSED LAYOUT FOR THE EXISTING
CHIRPRACTIC OFFICE AND THE DUGOUT
LY�DnM
UVOYB THIOi S smr. f mn7IIG CHAIN I=MCI mm HUTS
PARKING SPAM 2.0
RIB'
�� +� R8110F& 32' Of EIIS'i'ING
CHAIN I= MCL
ir
o
cmwpRACI4C
THE j. Omcs
4 DUGOUT
BURDEN BLVD
I e
AGENDA REPORT NO. 33
FOR: City Council September 23, 2009
TO: Gary Crutchfield City
Robert J. Alber Director
U'
FROM: Michael P. McSh City Engineer Workshop Mtg.: 09/28/2009
SUBJECT: Intersection Improvement Options at Road 68 and Court Street
I. REFERENCE(S):
I. Intersection Option Exhibits
II, ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
09/28: Discussion
LII. FISCAL IMPACT;
Street Fund
'IV. HIS'T'ORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The City received traffic complaints from residents living south of Court Street
along Road 68. The complaint stemmed from the inability to exit from Road 68
on the south side of Court Street during certain hours of the week. Subsequently,
a signal project at Road 68 and Court Street was shown in the 2008 and 2009 CIP
programs and the 2008 budget.
B) The Engineering staff prepared a signal design for Road 68 and Court Street.
During the design process, however, a concern arose that a signal system may not
be the most appropriate traffic control for the intersection. Staff requested the
Transpo Group evaluate the existing and future traffic patterns along with
reviewing the improvement alternatives. Their findings were presented during the
November 19, 2008 workshop meeting.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Staff has identified three alternatives for this intersection:
1) Traffic Signal
2) Roundabout
3) Traffic Channelization Islands
B) According to the Transpo Group and an evaluation of' traffic volumes, this
intersection does not meet MUTCD warrants for a traffic signal. Furthermore, a
signal may help during peak times but cause unnecessary delay during the
remainder of the day.
C) A roundabout appears to be the most efficient way to handle traffic patterns and
volumes at this particular intersection. Vehicles from the lower volume streets
will be able to navigate the intersection more freely, without causing undue
additional delay to current higher volume streets. Initial costs are usually more
than a traffic signal and there currently is insufficient right-of-way to build the
proposed design.
D) Staff believes the current channelization striping on Court Street creates some
confusion and hinders the traffic movement. Converting a west bound lane into a
right turn only lane onto Road 68 would eliminate some of the confusion. This
would also allow for a free right turn from south bound Road 68 to west bound
Court Street, improving traffic movement. These lanes can be created by building
raised concrete Traffic Channelization Islands.
E) Staff recommends that the roundabout be identified as a future capital
improvement project and the raised concrete Traffic Channelization Islands be
installed this year as an interim fix until such time a roundabout can be built.
Staff estimates this to occur within three to five years.
4(b)
s �
ti
Y
r
v
I+r
ti
low lo-
: .15i4s.411
t lie "P.
w
y
a �
_•- �R^AIL - _• va.�. -_M..�.- r-�•� ' rfl :' • `: , .�
EXHIBIT U
TRAFFIC SIGNAL,
W ;COURT ST
It
k. ! co .• �,,,
CIO
�� of
ik
r
,, e -
AP
�A i �� �-+ � 111''' 1 ��� �1■
. ti c
r �
� I f
r
,�i - , � •ram
r
w'
Of, 1
M <
i
f
� A
EXHIBIT 'D'
TRAFFIC ISLANDS
c00o1
ol
o
t x
00
WO
..--•....•�.•.-�w,...�,--.-- - - u ` .'r:i.- .+ter.' -
jr COURT,ST
= � 4
00 I,
wo
6.u�iiYe6.l: � �� -..Y�:�a _. •l t. }5�1 .r• . •(� Lnr►�:T:d�. ,. � ,� ;J3WJ��" r � '°sl°_�•'L\r�i��1• _�.r�� � I
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council September 21, 2009
TO: Gary Crutchfield a ager t W/Shop Mtg.: 09/28/09
Rick Terway, Ad in is ive & Communi s Director Regular Mtg.: 10/05/09
FROM: Debbie Clark, City Clerk
SUBJECT. "FOR HIRE— VEHICLES" LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Ordinance, Amending Chapter 5.45"For-Hire Vehicles"
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
09/28:Discussion
10/05:Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance No. amending Chapter 5.45 For-Hire
Vehicles, of the Pasco Municipal Code; and authorize the publication by summary only.
III, FISCAL IMPACT.
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) April 2008 Chapter 5.45 For-Hire Vehicles was amended to accurately reflect current
business license procedures and amend Pasco Municipal Code to conform to State
standards regarding For-Hire Vehicle businesses and Driver Permits.
B) After a year of license processing, staff has noted the need for further clarification
regarding licensing requirements. Please note the proposed revisions do not take away
from the integrity and safety aspect of the existing ordinance. Proposed amendments
are as follows:
5.45.040 OPERATOR'S VEHICLE LICENSE
Clarification that each vehicle including the business license must be approved prior to
conducting business;
5.45.060 OPERATOR'S BUSINESS LICENSE—TERM
Clarification to the Operator that all applicable requirements of PMC 5.45 must be met
prior to conducting business, including the approval for all Driver Permits;
5.45.090 DRIVER'S PERMIT- FEE
Clarification to the Driver's Permit fee, an annual fee along with a new permit application
will be required. Each of the above amendments add strength to the requirement of
maintaining current licensing requirements and renewing appropriate license(s) in a
timely manner;
5.45.100 DRIVER'S PERMIT- QUALIFICATIONS
Clarification regarding drivers operating in an independent contractor "status, and
clarification regarding educational requirements;
5.45.110 DRIVER'S PERMIT- REQUIREMENTS
Amendment to clarify the need of an "annual" criminal history check, and also correct a
typographical error noted during the codification process;
5.45.150 INSURANCE
Amendment to clarify each Operator to provide proof of insurance coverage for their
Drivers;
5.45.170 FARES
Amendment requesting a copy of the metered fare schedule to be kept on file.
C) Staff recommends amending Chapter 5.45"For-Hire Vehicles".
4(c)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington,
amending Section 5.45.040 "Operator's Vehicle License";
Section 5.45.060 "Operator's Business License — Term";
Section 5.45.090 "Driver's Permit — Fee"; Section 5.45.100
"Driver's Permit — Qualifications"; Section 5.45.110 "Driver's
Permit — Requirements"; Section 5.45.150 "Insurance"; and
Section 5.45.170 "Fares"
WHEREAS, amendments to Chapter 5.45 of the Pasco Municipal Code are
necessary to be consistent with these changes; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 5.45.040 entitled "Operator's Vehicle License" of the Pasco
Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
5.45.040 OPERATOR'S VEHICLE LICENSE. No For-Hire Vehicle shall be uaed
operated in the City unless such vehicle is licensed and an Operator's Business License has been
approved pursuant to Section 5.45.050 and 5.45.060 her-ea (Ord. 3858, 2008; Ord. 3335 Sec. 2,
1998.)
Section 2. That Section 5.45.060 entitled "Operator's Business License — Term" of
the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
5.45.060 OPERATOR'S BUSINESS LICENSE — TERM. Each Operator's
Business License shall be valid for one year from issue, and no fractional License shall be issued.
Such license shall begin Januaryl st of each year and terminate the following December 3151, and
must be renewed annually on the first regular business day of January, but in no case later than
the last regular working day of February each year. No Operator Business License shall be
issued until all applicable requirements of PMC 5.45 have been met. (Ord. 3858, 2008; Ord.
3335 Sec. 2, 1998.)
Section 3. That Section 5.45.090 entitled "Driver's Permit — Fee" of the Pasco
Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
5.45.090 DRIVER'S PERMIT — FEE. No person shall drive a For-Hire-Vehicle
within the City without first obtaining a Driver's Permit. No Operator shall utilize a Driver who
is not permitted as provided herein. Annual fee, as set forth in Chapter 3.07 of this code, shall
accompany the application for the Permit. In all cases where an Operator desires to act as a
Driver, he shall, in addition to the requirements for the Operator's License, secure a Driver's
:Permit. (Ord. 3858, 2008; Ord. 3335 Sec. 2, 1998.)
Ordinance Amending Chapter 5.45 , 1
Section 4. That Section 5,45,100 entitled "Driver's Permit - Qualifications" of the
Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
5.45.100 DRIVER'S PERMIT — QUALIFICATIONS. No person shall be issued a
Driver's Permit unless the person:
A) Is at least twenty-one (2 1) years of age and possesses a valid state driver's license;
and
B) Complies with all state laws and regulations relating to For-Hire Vehicles and
provides a copy of such proof including but not limited to the following:
1) Proof of age—21 years or older.
2) Valid State of Washington driver's license.
3) Proof of UBI (independent contractor).
4) Proof of insurance (independent contractor liability and property
insurance).
65) Proof of successfully completing a training course approved provided by
the National Safety Council; or school
licensed by the Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board.
76) Proof of successfully having passed a written examination
provided by Washington State Department of Lieensin the National Safety Council; or
school licensed by the Workforce Training and Education Coordinating Board
(applicable to limousine operators only and renewable every 3-years).
,97. Copy of a medical certificate certifying the individual's fitness as a
chauffeur(renew every 3-years),
The applicant shall file with the City Clerk an application on a form furnished by the City
Clerk, which shall be signed and sworn to by the applicant and which shall set forth the
following facts concerning the applicant: Name, height, weight, color of hair and eyes, residence
address, place and date of birth, length of time a resident in Pasco, whether a citizen or non-
citizen, last place of employment, whether previously permitted and if so where and whether or
not the Permit was ever suspended or revoked and for what cause, and such other information as
the City Clerk may require. (RCW 28C.10, RCW 46.72, RCW 46.72A and RCW 81.72) (Ord.
3858, 2008; Ord. 3560 Sec. 39, 2002; Ord. 3335 Sec. 2, 1998.)
Section 5. That Section 5.45,110 entitled "Driver's Permit -- Requirements" of the
Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
5.45.110 DRIVER'S PERMIT — REQUIREMENTS. Before a Driver's Permit
shall be issued, the applicant shall submit to and/or supply the following to the Pasco Police
Department:
A) To being fingerprinted for a non-refundable fee as set forth in Chapter 3.07 Of this
code;
B) Photographed annually for a non-refundable fee as set forth in Chapter 3.07 of
this code;
Ordinance Amending Chapter 5.45 -2
C) Driver's check;
D) Criminal history check— annually for a one time non-refundable fee as set forth in
Chapter 3.07 (RCW 46.72, RCW 42.72 Ar46.72A and RCW 81.72);
E) Health Department TB test results on an annual basis; and
F) Outstanding warrants check.
The Chief of Police shall notify the City Clerk with the approval or disapproval of the
applicant's qualifications. (Ord. 3858, 2008; Ord. 3335 Sec. 2, 1998).
Section 6. That Section 5.45.150 entitled "Insurance" of the Pasco Municipal Code
shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
5.45.150 INSURANCE. Each Operator and-DF:iver must maintain, during the term
of a License or Permit, as the case may be, insurance or a bond as prescribed by RCW 46.72.
(Ord. 3335 Sec. 2, 1998.)
Section 7. That Section 5.45.170 entitled "Fares" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall
be and hereby is amended and shall read as follows:
5.45.170 FARES.
A) There shall be conspicuously displayed in each For-Hire Vehicle, and at such
other places as may be required by the City, a schedule of fares to be charged for conveying
passengers within the City.
B) An Operator or Driver shall charge no more than the scheduled fee. Each
Operator shall maintain a current fare schedule on file with the City Clerk.
C) Fares shall be determined on an hourly basis or by metering. If fares are metered,
meters shall be annually calibrated by the meter's authorized representative and a copy provided
to the City Clerk upon license renewal. (Ord. 3858, 2008; Ord. 3335 Sec. 2, 1998.)
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as
provided by law this day of ) 2009.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark Leland B. Kerr
City Clerk City Attorney
Ordinance Amending Chapter 5.45 -3
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council September 24, 2009
FRAM: Gary Crutchfi Manager Workshop Mtg.: 9/28/09
SUBJECT: River Crossin Study
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. better from BFCG to Mayor Olson dated 8/27/09 (2 pages)
2. Study Boundary Map
Ii. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
9/28 Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
$18,750 from general fluid
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The Benton Franklin Council of Governments (BFCG), at the request of the City of
Pasco and others, has planned the conduct of a bridge study to determine the best
location for another river crossing to relieve growing and projected urban traffic
congestion. BFCG obtained a commitment of$125,000 from the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT), representing half the estimated $250,000
study cost.
B) The BFCG Board has determined that the affected jurisdictions (and special purpose
districts, such as Ports) participate financially, in accordance with a cost allocation
reflected in the attached letter. The BFCG Board has determined that a sing steering
committee, consisting of elected officials, would oversee the consultant's work.
BFCG desires to know of each jurisdiction's willingness to commit to the requested
funding level and participation in the study.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) City Council discussed this matter at its September 14 workshop and asked for
clarification of the study boundary (geographic) and the scope of the study (what is
the study intended to conclude).
• Geographic Boundary: BFCG provided the map attached as Reference 2. The
map illustrates the formal "highway urban area" boundary (in gray) and the
"potential" bridge locations(presumably, those to be studied).
• Scope: Mark Kushner (BFCG Transportation Planning Manager) indicates the
actual scope of work will be determined by the steering committee when
contracting with the eventual consultant. He confirmed that discussions by
steering committee members over the past several months have raised the
prospect that "economic development" could be a significant criteria, rather than
"urban congestion."
$) In addition to the foregoing issues, the cost sharing formula reflects that Walla Walla
participation would be half the rate of their peers, yet have full voting rights on the
committee.
C) In view of the need for another bridge to relieve growing congestion in the urban
area, staff recommends Pasco participation. However, Council may wish to
condition its participation on one or more of the following:
• That the scope of work for the study clearly reflect that the next Columbia River
crossing location be determined primarily by its ability to relieve projected urban
traffic congestion.
• That all participants pay the same amount, if afforded the same voting weight on
the steering committee.
4(d)
B Benton--Franklin Council of Governments
F 1622 TERK MAL DRIVE Phone: (509)943-9185
�/-±± P.O.BOX 217 FAX- (509)943-6756
L7 RICHLAND,WA 99352 WWW.BFCOG.US
PASCO CITY HAt
P>-r.FlV/�Zn
August 27, 2009
AUG 2 8 26
:,1-i Y iviNid;,CEzR'�
To: Joyce Olson, Mayer UFFICE
Subject: Columbia River Bridge Crossing Study Budget and Selection of Jurisdiction
Voting Member.
Dear Mayor,
The BFCG and many MPO jurisdictions have been looking at a new crossing of the Columbia
River over the last few years. This legislative session a$250,000 study proposed by the BFCG
was half funded per WSDOT in June. The funding was available July 1St, 2009. Based on many
meetings over the last year it has been determined that this is a truly regional study and multiple
members should be involved in the recommendations.
Last Friday, the BFCG Board approved a recommended funding approach to match the
legislative funds. Your jurisdiction's amount is shown on the attachment as well as the other
metropolitan partners. This notice should help member agencies that are in the 2010 budget
process.
Additionally, the Board approved a steering committee to help guide the study and the
consultant. We are asking that you notify us of who your Elected Official will be on this study.
Alternates will be allowed but members must be elected officials in order to vote. Technical staff
members are encouraged to attend but are not allowed to vote.
We would appreciate your response to these two requests by September 18, 2009 so we can
schedule our first meeting before Oc r.
It is anticipated that the st will last about one year. Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,V�,hner
cc: Gary rutchfield, City Manager
Attach: BFCG recommended budget.
MRS056-MK-W-09
AGENDA ITEM: 17B
B Bentonewhankfin Council of Governments
1622 Terminal Drive Phone :(509) 943-9185
P.O. Box 217 Fax: (509) 943-6756
Piicfiland,WA 99352
August 11, 2009
TO: BENTON-FRANKLIN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS BOARD
Bob Koch, President
FROM: Executive Committee
Bob Koch, President
SUBJECT: Colombia River Crossing Study Funding Proposal and Alternates
RECOMMENDATION: Encourage individual jurisdiction participation in the
funding of the Columbia River Crossing Study as indicated below, and that voting
committee alternates must be an elected official.
CRCS STUDY PAC FUNDING PROPOSAL
JUSIDICTION $ Amount % New $
BFCG 15,000.00 15.0% 18,750.00
Kennewick 15,000.00 15.0% 18,750.00
Pasco 15,000.00 15.0% 18,750.00
Richland 15,000.00 15.0% 18,750.00
Benton County 10,000.00 10.0% 12,500.00
Franklin County 10,000.00 10.0% 12,500.00
Walla Walla County 2,500.00 2.5% 3,125.00
Port of Benton 5,000.00 5.0% 6,250.00
Port of Kennewick 5,000.00 5.0% 6,250.00
Port of Pasco 5,000.00 5.0% 6,250.00
Port of Walla Walla 2,500.00 2.5% 3,125.00
100,000.00 100.0% 125,000.00
BACKGROUND: The adoption of the Columbia River Crossing Study Steering
Committee at the July meeting left the study $25,000 short of full funding. Each
participating jurisdiction is requested to increase their participation by twenty-five
percent.
LO—
0
In
U
CD
co
C\2—
10
yo�
qj
CN .1i
LO
0
am
3
to av
"1440 A -0
a)
ti cr)
"Ovo
PWIV31--T
MoM
WWI
IwDQM
ou -"sywa
——---------- ------—-------