Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009.08.24 Council Workshop Packet AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. August 24, 2009 1. CALL TO ORDER, 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance. 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:, 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSIONr (a) CSC Transportation Plan: 1. Agenda Report from Robert J. Alberts, Public Works Director dated August 20, 2009. 2. Letter of Support. 3. Vicinity Map. (b) Road 68 Improvements: 1. Agenda Report from Robert J. Alberts, Public Works Director dated August 20, 2009. 2. Vicinity Map. (c) Stormwater Ordinance: 1. Agenda Report from Doyle L. Heath, Utility Engineer dated August 19, 200.9. 2. Ordinance. (d) 2010 HOME Fund Allocations and Annual Work Plan(MF#CDBG09-021): 1. Agenda Report from Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator dated August 17, 2009. 2. Resolution Allocating 2010 HOME Funds. 3. Community Housing Improvement Program(CHIP) Priority Area Map. (e) 2010 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Allocations and Annual Work Plan (MF#CDBG09-004): 1. Agenda Report from Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator dated August 18, 2009. 2. 2010 CDBG Fund Summary and Proposal Summary. 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated June 18, 2009 and July 16, 2009. (f) Local Improvement District#147 (California Avenue&Bonneville Street): 1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated August 20, 2009. 2. Vicinity Map. 3. Street Cross Section. (g) Parking Ordinance Revision: 1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated August 6, 2009. 2. Map. 3. Ordinance. (h) Angle Parking Ordinance Revision: 1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated August 6, 2009. 2. Map. 3. Ordinance. (i) Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointments: 1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated August 17, 2009. 2. Resolution No. 2314. (j) Capital Improvement Plan: 1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated August 21, 2009. 2. Proposed Capital Improvement Plan 2010-2015 (copy available for review in the City Manager's office, Pasco Library or on the city's website at http://www.pasco- wa. ov/ eneralinfo/financeaccountin }. 3. Proposed Resolution. S. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) (b) (c) Workshop Meeting 2 August 24, 2009 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (a) (b) (c) 7. ADJOURNMENT REMINDERS: J. 1:30 p.m., Monday, August 24, 9335 Sandifur Parkway — Broadmoor Storage Solutions Grand Opening/Ribbon Cutting Event. (MAYOR JOYCE OLSON) 2. 4:00 p.m., Monday, August 24, Port of Benton — Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MATT WATKINS,Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.) 7:30 a.m., Thursday, August 27, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd -Tri-Cities Visitor& Convention Bureau Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON,Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) 4. 4:00 p.m., Thursday, August 27, 7130 W. Grandridge Blvd - TRIDEC Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MIKE GARRISON,Rep.; TOM LARSEN, Alt.) 5. 5:30 p.m., Thursday, August 27, 710 W. Court Street — Benton Franklin Community Action Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER AL YENNEY, Rep.; REBECCA FRANCIK, Alt.) 6. 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, September 2, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue—Franklin County Mosquito Control District Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN,Rep.; AL YENNEY, AIt.) 7. 4:00 p.m., Thursday, September 3, 710 W. Court Street—Franklin County Affordable Housing Trust Fund Oversight Committee Meeting. (MAYOR JOYCE OLSON, COUNCILMEMBERS REBECCA FRANCIK and MIKE GARRISON) 8. 5:30 p.m., Thursday, September 3, Parks & Rec. Classroom —Parks & Recreation Advisory Council Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER REBECCA FRANCIK, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, AIt.) The next meeting will be held Tuesday, September 8 as City Hall will be closed in honor of Labor Day. AGENDA REPORT NO. 28 FOR: City Council August 20, 2009 TO: Gary Crutchfi(e .t anager FROM: Robert J. Albert uorks Director Workshop Mtg.: 08/24/09 SUBJECT: Transportation Plan—LColumbia Basin College &.The TRANSPO Group I. REFERENCE(S), 1. Letter of Support 2. Vicinity Map II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 08/24: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The Columbia Basin College (CBC) contracted with The TRANSPO Group to prepare a campus master traffic/pedestrian plan, The plan will address needs on 201h Avenue, Argent Road, pedestrian safety and Benton Franklin Transit routes. The plan is now completed. V. DISCUSSION: A) Bill Saraceno, CBC Vice President of Administration and Bruce Haldors of The TRANSPO Group will address the Council and discuss the findings of the transportation plan. Proposed improvements will impact the City's streets and address pedestrian safety. A significant change in the Plan is to route Benton Franklin Transit through the campus which would significantly reduce the number of pedestrians crossing on 201h Avenue and Argent Road. CBC would like Council's support for the plan. Staffs recommendation is to support the plan. 4(a) Columbia H j)! 11.1i!Xt , F1;1'l'kI , FOIZC1I.XN(-;lt(., I-I\Ih:y August 18, 2009 Pasco City Council City Hall 525 N. Third Avenue Pasco,WA 99301 Subject: Columbia Basin College (CBC) Campus Access Revisions Dear Council Members: For your information, Transpo Group of Kirkland recently conducted a comprehensive master plan circulation study of the Columbia Basin College campus in Pasco. This study began as an Argent traffic signal request; however, it has evolved to a master plan level study. The primary focus includes improving access to the College, by meeting the following objectives: • The reduction of short-term delays and congestion at 20`h Avenue during peak periods. The improvement of on-campus pedestrian safety. • The increased usage of transit system by students, faculty and staff. • Compatibility with future facility improvement goals of the College i.e., development of a central core concept and increasing our internal connectivity. At this time, 1 would like to thank the council for the opportunity to discuss the College access plans. I am asking for the council's support by way of resolution to continue to pursue these improvements. Sincerely, i William E. Saraceno Vice President of Administration WES/bb cc: Gary Crutchfield �. L� �'•.,til � �o L'. .U`d't`'--O:�. t.:a.'i�E .i.;E,-i 41, CBC TRANSPORTATION PLAN -1 _ , - .1 IMP s Sf +{ff1J. t � yy r w k . �.W- W S TUDYAREA OV l ire.. ... �� +�1-.—r—•— �� , •'; ``�.�.�- ��`�• ��., �`~� ��� ►, � ��,; 1 182 "f - - - r h � �� rr��' .�j"✓` � ���,-- "icy�`F�i►'IrV _ �.R�,�,• i�i r I � C �tb�iw.��t"''��� �� � � '� ."���� .ter-•y-t- v". ti. t`. r. •. .� �,. u.-, ="`T•� ,(l.:is•'[� �r "^ i �; M. vl� 'rT;urs ~ ,•�!!',M C dill Mkt ref. - S 'l1 �••��,'j '+' .i.. t "•�c a .•'�^.�P'� u •f.•aX a:r • « :Y! I �� l:.-' A1P.C�5 ,,, •- ,y4 i4. '�•t'd�; .� ` K. S*.r�mu"- PEA ST•mac � rr ,._,;�;� ��!_r �,�si•_ ,:��y •u�+ �:.y �% ^�� ,h`A'�r '!•t,, .a'" 1 v :L � L�tJ� i �•-� ia''�-i 1 1 yY�i� ;� wIsm +.•Y' fag�+ ri :s'+.r�'' 1.. ..y. -.i�L wr.•��YaU•�' jT;L„ All l,° '^�• �:� T URT' S' - - VICINITY MAP N.T.S. I I AGENDA REPORT NO. 27 FOR: City Council August 20, 2009 TO: Gary Crutchfield, ager FROM: Robert J. Alber(, P orks Director Workshop Mtg.: 08/24/09 SUBJECT: Road 68 Improvements The TRANSPO Group I. REFERENCE(S): .,I,, Vicinity Map II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 08/24: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) A Council Goal is to address the Road 68 traffic congestion. The TRANSPO Group has been working on the Road 68 traffic issues as well- as the 1-182 Corridor. V. DISCUSSION: A) Bruce Haldors of The TRANSPO Group will discuss a proposed project to help improve traffic flow on Road 68. 4(b) j `+ 'RR nab • �.:• -- _ � ,•t �� -ice' IR�. i � 1 _ rj4 1. 41111011 floill It • 1 � 79rn � -••••1 � + r ' � t .', � •l r R' r r �� s-• _ �'•'= iii 1 1!. r' l f .-.. 1' ,F tit � - ryt .a yi": � L�v. '�+ �' %�"-it •, �� •YID �� i ��r� qaM+' 9 AGENDA REPORT NO. 26 FOR: City Council August 19, 2009 TO: Gary Crutchfie Ci anager Workshop Meeting: 08/24/09 Robert J. Albert , �Vurk-s Director Regular Meeting: 09/08/09 FROM: Doyle L Heath, Utility Engineer SUBJECT: Stormwater Ordinance I, REFERENCE(S): 1, Ordinance II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 8/24: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. amending Chapter 13.60 "Stormwater Management Utility." III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The State Department of Ecology created the Eastern Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (Permit) that became effective on February 16, 2007. This Permit created regulations for cities in "urbanized areas." The City of Pasco, the City of Kennewick, the City of Richland, and the City of West Richland were identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as being an "urbanized area." The City of Pasco was impacted by the Permit. B) A presentation was made to the Council at the July 23, 2009 Workshop Meeting. The presentation showed the requirements of the Permit and what needed to be included in the Municipal Code. V. DISCUSSION: A) The Eastern Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit includes a number of requirements for the City. The requirement of the Permit that is being addressed at this time is to prohibit non-stormwater discharges to the stormwater system. The Permit states that the requirements are to be approved by an ordinance. Some of the requirements are already a part of the Municipal Code. The attached Ordinance addresses the requirements of the Permit that do not already exist in the Municipal Code. The changes: a; Add a definition for "Illicit Discharge" in Section 13.60.030, as any discharge not composed entirely of storm water. b. Add Section 13.60.140 Prohibited Discharges. Illicit discharges are not allowed into private storm drain systems. c. Add Section 13.60.150 to authorize certain non-stormwater discharges to the public system: A) Discharges are allowed from water line flushing, fire hydrant flushing, pipe breaks, and pipeline hydrostatic test water when chlorine and pH are adjusted. B) Discharges from lawn watering and dust control are permitted but proper sprinkler pattern is required. C) Wash water for cleaning streets, sidewalks and buildings is an authorized discharge, if it is not really dirty and uses biodegradable detergent. D) At construction sites with curb and gutter, catch basins shall have approved screening protection and subdivision developers are required to enter into an agreement with the City Engineer. d. Add Section 13,60.160 Permitted Discharges. Discharges, other than non-stormwater discharges as permitted by this Chapter, require a special permit issued by the City Engineer or the State. 4(c) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, .Amending Chapter 13.60 "Stormwater Management Utility." WHEREAS, the State of Washington Department of Ecology has created the "Eastern Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit" which became effective on February 16, 2007; and WHEREAS, this permit includes a number of requirements for the City prohibiting non- stormwater discharges to the stormwater system which are necessary for compliance with the permit; and WHEREAS, to implement compliance with the permit regulations, changes are necessary to Chapter 13.60 of the Pasco Municipal Code; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Section 13.60.030 entitled "Definitions" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follow: 13.60.030 DEFINITIONS. For the purpose of this title, certain terms or words herein shall be interpreted or defined as follows: Except where specifically defined in this chapter all words in this title shall carry the customary meanings. Words used in the present tense include the future and the future includes the present and the plural includes the singular and the singular includes the plural. A) "Apartments" means any parcel that contains six or more residential units and is used primarily for residential purposes. B) "Developed parcel" means any parcel altered from the natural state by the construction, creation, or addition of impervious surfaces. C) "Director" means the Director of the Department of Public Works or the Director's designee. D) "Drainage facility" means the system of collecting, conveying, and storing surface and storm water runoff. Drainage facilities shall include, but not be limited to all surface and storm water conveyance and containment facilities including streams, pipelines, channels, ditches, swamps, lakes, wetlands, closed depressions, infiltration facilities, retention/detention facilities, erosion/sedimentation control facilities, and other drainage structures and appurtenances, both natural and constructed. E) "Illicit Discharge" means any discharge to the storm system that is not composed entirely of storm water, discharge resulting from emergency fire fighting, or other discharges specifically authorized by this Chapter. 1✓F) "Impervious surface" means a hard surface area which either prevents or retards the entry of water into the soil mantle as it entered under natural conditions prior to development, and/or a hard surface area which causes water to run off the surface in greater quantities or at an increased area of flow from the flow present under natural conditions prior to development. Common impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to, roofs, walkways, patios, driveways, parking lots, storage areas, areas which are paved, graveled or made of packed or oiled earthen materials, or other surfaces which similarly impede the natural infiltration of surface and storm water. Open, uncovered retention/detention facilities shall not be considered as impervious surfaces for the purpose of this chapter. FG) "Industrial/Commercial property" means any parcel used by a person not defined as apartment, residence or undeveloped parcel. GH) "Maintenance" means the act or process of cleaning, repairing or preserving a system, unit, facility, structure, or piece of equipment. #I) "Multi-family Residential" means any parcel which contains from one to five residential units which is within a single structure and is used primarily for residential purposes. LJ) "Parcel" means the smallest separately segregated unit or plot of land having an identified owner, boundaries, and surface area which is documented for property tax purposes and given a tax lot number by the Franklin County Assessor. 3K) "Person" means any individual, firm, company, association, corporation, or governmental agency. KL) "Property owner of record" means a person or persons shown in the records of the County Assessor to be the owner of property and to whom property tax statements are directed. LM) "Rate category" means the classification in this chapter given to a parcel in the service area based upon the type of land use on the parcel and/or the surface area (in acres) of the parcel for lands with stormwater that enters the public right-of-way. MN) "Rates" means the dollar amount charged per unit or per parcel in the. "General Classification" of section 13.60.070 based upon the accommodation of stormwater runoff and other surface water management services due to vehicle usage in the public right-of-way associated with the land use activity. Private parcels, excluding single family residence, with impervious surfaces exceeding 1000 square feet which drain to the City street or right-of-way shall be charged an additional monthly fee not to be less than 50% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) unit as set forth in 13.60.070. NO) "Retention/detention facility" means a type of drainage facility designed either to hold water for a considerable length of time and then release it by evaporation, plant transpiration and/or infiltration into the ground; or to hold runoff for a short period of time and. then release it to the surface and storm water management system. Ordinance Amending Chapter 13.60 Page 2 8P) "Service changes" means charges to property owners for storm and surface water management services. P-Q) "Single Family Residence" means a building or structure or portion thereof, designed for and used to provide a place of abode for human beings. The term residence includes the term "residential" or"residential unit" as referring to the type of or intended use of a building or structure. QR) "State highway right-of-way" means the right-of-way of a state limited access highway. The term does not include City streets forming a part of the route of state highways that are not limited access highways or state property under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) that are outside the right-of-way lines of a state highway. RS) "Stormwater" means the water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that is found in drainage facilities, rivers, streams, springs, seeps, ponds, lakes, and wetlands as well as shallow groundwater. ST) "Stormwater management services" means the services provided by the stormwater management utility, including but not limited to basin planning, facilities maintenance, street sweeping, regulation, financial administration, public involvement, drainage investigation and enforcement, aquatic resource restoration, surface and storm water quality and environmental monitoring, natural surface water drainage system planning, intergovernmental relations, and facility design and construction. TD "Stormwater management system" means constructed drainage facilities and any natural surface water drainage features which collect, store, control, treat and/or convey surface and storm water including pipes, pump stations, and street gutters. UV) "Undeveloped parcel" means any parcel that has not been altered from its natural state by the construction, creation, or addition of impervious surface(s). VW) "Utility" means the Stormwater Management Utility created under the provisions of this chapter. AX) "Vacant building" means any unoccupied building or structure or portion thereof, designed for and intended to be used by a person. (Ord. 3386 Sec. 1, 1999.) Section 2. That a new Section 13.60.140 entitled "Prohibited Discharges" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is adopted and shall read as follows: 13.60.140 PROHIBITED DISCHARGES. Illicit discharges, as defined by the Washin on State Department of Ecology, are not allowed into private storm drain systems Section 3. That a new Section 13.60.150 entitled "Authorized Discharges" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is adopted and shall read as follows:. Ordinance Amending Chapter 13.60 Page 3 13.60.150. AUTHORIZED DISCHARGES. Discharges to the public stormwater system from the following sources shall be authorized, provided each complies with the respective conditions attached thereto: A) Discharges from water pipe sources, including water line flushing, fire hydrant system flushing, pipe breaks and pipeline hydrostatic test water. Planned discharges shall be controlled to prevent contaminates from entering the stormwater system and discharging to the Columbia River. Chlorine levels shall be reduced to 0.1 ppm or less and pH adjusted. B) Discharges from lawn irrigation or dust control water, provided the sprinkler pattern is.fixed within the boundaries of the irrigated property. C) Water used to wash down streets, sidewalks and buildings, provided the wash water is low in suspended solids and any detergent used is biodegradable. D) At active construction sites, with curb and gutter, an approved screening protection system shall be installed in catch basins and street sweeping must be performed prior to washing the street. Damage to street ditches or grass swales shall not be allowed. The developer of subdivisions with constructed curbs and gutters shall be responsible for the protection and maintenance of the stormwater system for five years or until all the lots are built on, whichever comes first. The protection measures and maintenance prograrn hall be approved by the City Engineer in the form of a written agreement with the developer. Section 4. That a new Section 13.60.160 entitled "Permitted Discharges" of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is adopted and shall read as follows: 13.60.160 PERMITTED DISCHARGES. Discharges, other than non-stormwater discharges as permitted by this Chapter shall require prior approval through a special discharge permit issued by the City Engineer or the State, conditioned upon compliance with the requirements adopted by the City, regulations of the State of Washington, and such other conditions as may be reasonably necessary for the protection of the system, environment, and the health and welfare of the general public. Section 5. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval, passage and publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this day of ) 2009. Joyce Olson, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney Ordinance Amending Chapter 13.60 Page 4 AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council Date: August 17,2009 TO: Gary Crutchfi ty Manager Workshop: 08/24/09 Rick White,Di t Regular: 09/08/09 Community& conomic Development FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator Community&Economic Development Department SUBJECT: 2010 HOME Fund Allocations and Annual Work Plan (iINIF# CDBG09-021) I. REFERENCE(S?:, 1. Resolution allocating 2010 HOME funds. 2. Community Housing Improvement Program(CHIP) Priority Area Maps II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 08/24/09: DISCUSSION 09/08/09: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No, allocating the estimated 2010 HOME funds. III, FISCAL IMPACT Estimated$542,000 in Federal HOME funds, approximately $217,000 from 2010 Entitlement and$325,000 from 2009 Program Income. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:, .k. Pasco entered into a HOME Consortium Agreement with Richland and Kennewick in 1996 making the City eligible for .Federal HOME funds. In September, 2007, this Agreement was extended indefinitely. .B. It is estimated that in 2010 HOME funds totaling approximately $542,000 will be available. Staff proposes $40,000 be used for eight First Time Homebuyer's Assistance loans, $150,000 for three infill property acquisition and gap financing projects, and$297,800 to be used for rental rehabilitations(between 3 and 10 units). C. A Redevelopment Strategy Plan, accepted by Council in 2004, recommended that assistance programs be concentrated in two neighborhoods in the vicinity of Longfellow School and the Franklin County Historical Museum. To date 16 owner.— occupied rehabilitations have been completed in these priority neighborhoods. Approximately $300,000 in HOME funds is still available from prior year allocations for approximately 12 additional owner—occupied rehabilitations. 'D. The Rental Rehabilitation component (recommended use of$297,800) is suggested as an addition to the HOME program. Currently, the HOME program does not provide the opportunity for landlords to rehabilitate rental properties. Once rehabilitated with HOME funds, a rental unit would be required to remain affordable to low-moderate income families. The City's existing rental inspection program provides a ready supply of properties that could benefit from use of HOME funds in this manner. A Rental Rehabilitation component is a valuable strategy for physically improving neighborhoods while retaining housing affordability (rules for a Rental Rehabilitation Program would be developed prior to implementation for City CounciI's approval). & HOME funds are based on need and income eligibility and may be used anywhere within the city limits, however, neighborhoods designated as priority by Pasco City Council receive first consideration. Funding is first targeted in the Longfellow and Museum neighborhoods, then within low-moderate income census tracts (201, 202, 203 and 204). If HOME funds cannot be applied to those areas, then they are used as needed within the Pasco City limits for the benefit of eligible low-moderate income 4�d� families. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION ALLOCATING ESTIMATED 2010 FEDERAL HOME FUNDS. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco entered into an Agreement with Kennewick and Richland in 2007 continuing participation in a Consortium originally formed in 1996 under the. Home Investments Partnership (HOME) Program; and WHEREAS, the Consortium allows the three cities to be eligible for federal HOME funds; and WHEREAS, the City has established a, Community Housing "Improvement Program (CHIP); and WHEREAS, it is estimated in 2010, the City of Pasco will receive $217,000 federal HOME Entitlement Funds plus $325,000 in Program Income for a total estimated available of $542,000; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: Section 1. 2010 HOME funds received by the City of Pasco shall be allocated to the Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP) operate city-wide. Priority will be given to neighborhood improvement areas and low-moderate income census tracts as needed for the following activities below: Activity Estimated Units Amount HOME Administration $54,200.00 First Time Homebuyer's Program 8 $40,000.00 Infill Homebu er's Program 3 $150,000.00 Rental Rehabilitation Assistance 3 $297,800.00 TOTAL ALLOCATED $542,000.00 PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of ,2009. CITY OF PASCO: Joyce Olson Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: -lE i ga * m n AVE \ \ ::a Ll Li \ $a � � . * # » . . .1 % PE k m+ AVE § � � Q & \ N. n6 A4 N. eTH AVE: m un # � � + � k \ rn %4. � � 0 CA N. 7a AVE N. ,m AVE &�® \ jTxk k S. ¥ � q # k s% AVE N. 5m AVE � m R £ r \ \ rn U) f a � M ¥ \ & N. 4R AVE c & � � f ¥ , & o 4 % ƒ \ $ 'P / k & 4 ¥ � ® U31 S ^ / ¥ ® 1L $ o = & $ � \ ci Lp � s @£ & A+ CITY OF PASCO COMMUNITY FIGURE HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CHIP) AREA LOCATION MAP j , ; AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council Date: August 18,2009 TO: Gary Crutchfield, Ci r Workshop Mtg.: 08/24/09 Rick White, 2\,c,j Regular Mtg.: 09/08/09 Community&Econo is D velopment: Director FROM: Angela R. Pitman, Block Grant Administrator SUBJECT: 2010 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Allocations and Annual Work Plan(MF#CDBG09-004) 1. REFERENCUS): I.. 2010 CDBG Fund Summary and Proposal Summary 2. Planning Commission Minutes June 18, 2009 and July 16, 2009 11. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.: 08/24/09- DISCUSSION III. FISCAL IMPACT It is estimated that the 2010 annual entitlement grant will be$600,000 with no program income. Funds available for reallocation are$65,000, making a total of$665,000 in funds available for use in 2010. There is always some question regarding actual funding levels approved by Congress. Actual available funding for these FY 2010 activities will remain in question until the early part of 2010 when the allocation is made. If funding levels are lower than estimated, activity funding may need to be reallocated accordingly. IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. A Request for Proposals for 2010 CDBG Program Year Funds was published in the Tri- City Herald and La Voz Hispanic newspapers. Attached are the CDBG Fund and Proposal Summaries relating to the 2010 Program. Sixteen (16) requests were received totaling $1,392,000. Approximately$665,000 will be available for funding 2010 activities. $.. HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG Funds obligated within a program year to support public service activities may not exceed 15%of the total entitlement. C. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on June 18, 2009, and discussion on July 16, 2009. The public hearing, which was advertised in the Tri-City Herald and La Voz, solicited public comment either for or against any application for funding, or reallocation for the City of Pasco 2010 Community Development Block Grant(CDBG) Program. At the public hearing sixteen (16) presentations were made relating to proposed activities. Discussion at the July 16, 2009 meeting resulted in an amended work plan. Minutes of both meetings are attached. V, DISCUSSION A. Staff presented recommendations for funding at the July 16, 2009 Pasco Planning Commission meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of staff funding recommendations with three changes: 9 Brush With Kindness(8 Households)—Requested: $24,000 Staff Recommended: $0 PC Recommended: $24,000 This application will be used to provide staff coordination and materials for minor exterior household repair and painting for 8 low/very low income families' homes in the Museum and Longfellow neighborhoods (Census Tract 202). Staff has not recommended funding for this application because there is another source of funds for residential repair in the HOME program; this is basically a cosmetic application;and as a new activity,there is uncertainty about the 4(e) number of homes that would be served. 14 Lucas Park Playground Equipment–Requested: $60,000 Staff Recommended: $60,00.0_ PC Recommended: $0 This application will use CDBG funds to replace playground equipment in Lucas Park which is outdated. This project will serve the local neighborhood that is composed primarily of low-moderate income families. Staff recommended funding for this application because it will replace non- compliant play equipment/ground mats—reducing liability exposure; monies in the general fund will be need to be used for this application if CDBG funds are not; and the City can quickly use these funds—helping timeliness mandates and reducing administrative costs. 16 Kurtzman Park Nejzhborhood.lmprovements.- Phase II (CT201BG4)- Requested: $300,000 Staff Recommended $139,500 PC Recommended: $175,500 This application will use CDBG funds to provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and roadway improvements in the low-income neighborhood near Kurtzman Park (Census Tract 201). Staff recommends that the original amount of$139,500 be restored to this project. The city has previously committed approximately $298,000 to this project. Restoring the original staff recommended amount will enable the city to proceed with the Kurtzman Neighborhood improvements as identified in the Kurtzman Neighborhood Action Plan, and accommodate the Lucas Park playground equipment replacement. Improvements to this neighborhood is also an adopted Council goal for 2008–2009. 1 2010 CDBG Fund Summary -July 16, 2009 Page 1 Planning Commission Meeting Proposals-Recommendations 1D ,Recipients ACTIVITY 1 AGENCY NohCDBGMa" Agency Staff PC NAME Requested Recommend Recommend City of Pasco-Community CDBG Program $0.00 .$126,000.00 $120,060.00 $120,000.00 1 &Economic Development Administration City of Pasco- Administrative& Civic Center-Youth $45,500.00 $ 7,500,0q $3A,0000t7 $30,OQ(.4}0 ?_ Community Services Recreation Specialist City of Pasco- Martin Luther King Administrative& Community Center $1.00,500.i30 $67,500,00 $,30,000:00 $30,000.00 3 Community Services Recreation Specialist City of Pasco- Administrative& Senior Citizen's Center .$200,000:00 $37,500.00 $20,000.00 $20;000.00 4 Community Services Recreation Specialist Pasco Downtown Pasco Downtown Development Association- Development Commercial $40,420.00 $65,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.o0 5 ISK Kitchen Pasco Downtown Development Association- Downtown Fagade $20,000.00 $&0,00040 $0:00 $0.00 PDDA Improvement(4 fagades) Benton Franklin CAC- Energy Efficient Home $2(F,000,00 $2f1,000.00 $0.00 $0,00 7 Home Energy Program(10 households) City of Pasco-Community CHIP Minor Rehab, $20,000.00 $20,000,00 S &Economic Development Program(4 households) Tri-County Partners, Brush With Kindness(8. $24,000:00 $24,000.00 $0.00 $24,000.00 9 Habitat for Humanity Households) Continuing to Step Up(2 $30,000:00 $482;000.00 S$150,000:00 $150,000.00 1'0 Elijah Family Homes Households) $72,000.00 $288,000�.S33D 11 Jericho Roads Ministries Havensafe(8 Households) Boys&Girls Club of ,Benton&Franklin Boys&Girls Center $9,300:00. $17,500.00 $17�500.00, $47 5000 1 )Counties Tween Center Design Boys&Girls Club of Boys&Girls Club External . Benton&Franklin lighting&security system $47,460.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $0.00. 1;X Counties camera and monitor City of Pasco- Administrative& Lucas Park Playground $0.013 $6010t1Q_00 $602000.00 $0.00 14 Community Services Equipment City of Pasco-Inspection $17,025:130 $48,000.00 $48,000:00 $48,000,00 15.' :Services Code Enforcement Officer Neighborhood .City of Pasco-Public Improvements-Phase II $0,00 $300,000,00 1139,500.00 $175,500:00 16 Works (CT201 BG4) $6"16,208.00 $11,392,00000 $686,000.00 $665,000.00 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000 Program Income(Estimated) $ - Prior Year Reallocations $ 65,000 Total Funds Available $ 665,000 Proposals Recommended $ 665,000 SURPLUS/DEFICIT $ - CITY OF PASCO 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 16, 2009 1 CDBG Program Administration-_Requested: $120,000 Recommended: $120,000 CDBG funds will be used to plan, administer and deliver housing and community needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate income people. Requesting full 20% cap due to number of projects ongoing this program year. 2 _Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist—Requested: $37,500 Recommended: $30,000 CDBG funds will be used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Youth Civic Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for youth at risk and families in low-to-moderate income Census Tract (202). Consistent with funding in 2008, reduction is recommeded to meet public service cap of no greater than 15%current entitlement plus prior year program income. 3 Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist—Requested: $37,500 Recommended: $30,000 CDBG funds will be used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist at the Martin Luther King. This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities to at risk school age , youth, and families in Census Tract (201). Consistent with funding in 2008, reduction is recommeded to meet public service cap of no greater than 15% current entitlement plus prior year program income. 4 Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist—Requested:_$37,500 Recommended: $20,000 CDBG funds will be used to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly of Pasco with support services, nutrition, health and living skills support. Consistent with funding in 2008, reduction is recommeded to meet public service cap of no greater than 15% current entitlement plus prior year program income. CITY OF PASCO 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 16,2009 5 Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen—.Requested: $65,000 Recommended: $50,000 CDBG funds will be used to continue operations of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, a certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical support to small food-related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance, the startup businesses agree to make jobs created available to low-to-moderate income persons in Pasco (Census Tract 202). Reduction consistent with prior year funding levels. 6 Downtown Facade Improvement(4 facades)—Requested: 180,000 Recommended: $0 CDBG funds will be used to support business to continue downtown fagade improvements, for new projects are anticipated for 2009 (Census Tract 202). Project not recommend for funding until prior year program funding is expended. Currently funded at $160,000 eight facades in 2008 and 2009. 7 Energy Efficient Home Program (10 households)—Requested: $20,000 Recommended: $0 CDBG funds will be used to provide 10 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards improvements (City-wide). This project is well funded for this program year, recommend funding be utilized for underfunded projects. 8 CHIP Minor Rehab Program (4 households)—Requested: $20,000 Recommended: $0 CDBG funds will be used to provide 4 low-income households with improvements to their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards improvements (Census Tract 202). This project is also funded through HOME, recommend funding be utilized for underfunded projects. 9 Brush With Kindness (8 Households)—Requested: $2000.. Recommended: $0 CDBG funds will be used to provide staff coordination and materials for minor exterior household repair projects or 8 low/very low income families in the Museum and Longfellow neighborhoods (Census Tract 2021 2 CITY OF PASCO 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 16, 2009 Recommend funding be utilized for underfunded projects. Should other funding become available this project should considered. It is uncertain how many projects will be able to be completed since this is a new activity. Funds are for site specific project delivery costs and for physical improvements. They are not eligible for public service or administrative activities. 10 Continuin2 to Step U —Requested: S182,000 Recommended: $150,000 CDBG funds will be used acquisition/rehabilitiation of a three-bedroom duplex in Pasco for the purpose of providing affordable housing for 2 low/very low income families with small children who are otherwise unable to attain suitable housing. Recommend this project for acquisition and rehabilitation with other funds to provide affordable housing to those below 30% AMI. 11 Havensafe Domestic Violence—Requested: $288,000 Recommended: $0 CDBG funds will be used for acquisition/rehabilitation for suitable housing to provide 15 additional bed spaces for persons experiencing domestic violence in Pasco. Insufficient funds to fund fully,therefore, not recommended at this time. Recommend applicant move forward with planning and reapply when funding is available. 12 Design for Tween Center—Requested: $17,500 Recommended: $17,500 CDBG funds will be used to engage architect for facility expansion project for Tween's Center. Middle school students are underserved by current youth services programs. These youth are most usceptible to negative influences from peers. A new 2,500-3,000 square foot facility would provide them a"place of their own". Currently there are 49 members who will be ineligible to attend the Main Branch in 2009-2010. On average 40 youth "age-out" of the Main Branch facility annually. In 2008-2009 only 3 transitioned to Boys & Girls Club programs at the Teen Center where the participants are much older. With Construction of a new Tween Center, it is anticipated 80% of participants from the Main Branch program would be retained. Over three years it is estimated that the population would grow to 80 youth per day. By having a separate facility where more age-appropriate activities can take place and staff who are able to focus on the special needs of an adolescent population transitioning into their teen years, the youth in the community who need the most help will be more 3 CITY OF PASCO 2010 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 16, 2009 effectively served. 13 External lighting, security system camera and monitor— Requested: $55,000 Recommended: $0 CDBG funds will be used for design and technology for security enhancements in advance of of facility expansion. Exterior lighting to illuminate the front and west facing side of the bulding to ensure safe circumstances for youth and parents traveling to and from the Club an on the North and East sides where no light is currently present. Although necessary and desired for improved safety of those participating in programs at the facility. This project is not recommended for funding at this time. Recommend applicant move forward with project planning and reapply when funding becomes available.. 14 ,`Lucas Park Playground Equipment—Requested: $60,000 Recommended: $60,000 CDBG funds will be used to replace playground equipment in Lucas Park which is outdated. This project will serve the local neighborhood that is low-moderate income families.. Recommended replacement of non-compliant play equipment and safety mat for liability reasons. In addition, physical improvement projects are a high priority and may be performed quickly to assist the city in meeting timeliness goals. 15 Code Enforcement Officer—.Requested: $48,000 Recommended: $48,000 CDBG funds will be used to provide for a code enforcement officer to help improve neighborhood appearance and for compliance with rules and regulations dealing with homeowner needs in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204). 16 Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Improvements - Phase II (CT201BG4) Requested: $300,000 Recommended: $139,500 CDBG funds will be used to provide curb, gutter, sidewalk and roadway improvements in low-income neighborhood (Census Tract 2011 REGULAR MEETING June 18, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING B. CDBG 2010 Annual Action Plan JCity Wide) (MF#CDBG 09-004). Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Staff explained that the hearing was the first of two required for the development of the 2010. Notice of the hearing was published in the Tri-city Herald and the La Voz newspapers. Staff reviewed additional background information and explained the legislative proposes for the CDBG program. It was estimated the city would receive $600,000 for the 2010 program year. With prior year reallocations there would be 665,000 available for 2010. The City received 16 proposals from various organizations for use of the 2010 funds. The proposals requested approximately 1.4 million in funding, about $720,000 less than available funding. Commissioner Little asked about the funding that reviewed earlier in the year. Staff explained that the earlier hearings were for additional funding that amended the 2008 program. The 2010 funding proposals were presented as follows: Item 1: Program Administration ($120,000'j Angie Pitman, CDBG Coordinator, reported that this funding would offset the cost of administering the CDBG and pays the salary and benefits for the Block Grant Administrator and a portion of the salary and benefits for the Secretary. The remainder is used for other necessary expenses for administering the program. Item 2: Civic Center Recreation Specialist ($37,500) Item 3: Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist ($37,500), Item 4: Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist ($37,500) Stan Strebel, Administrative and Community Services Director explained his department was again requesting partial funding for recreation specialists at three of the City recreation facilities. The programs offered at the facilities range from after school programs for at risk youth to health care and nutrition programs for the elderly. Chairman Samuel asked if the request was similar to last years. Mr. Strebel stated very much so. Ms. Pitman added that public services are limited to 15% of the total entitlement plus prior year program income. Usually, these public service activities are reduced proportionately to meet that 15% cap. Item 5: Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen ($65,000) Victoria Silvernail, Manager of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen presented a request for $65,000 to operate the Pasco Specialty Kitchen which provides services to 35 small businesses. Ms. Silvernail explained how the Kitchen works with Columbia Basin College and the Columbia Basin Business Center to assist clients in developing business plans. Chairman Samuel asked if the Kitchen was more reliant on the CDBG funds. than it has been in the past. Ms. Silvernail explained they receive funding from the City, Pasco School District and user's fees. Chairman Samuel asked how many years the Kitchen had been receiving city funding. Ms... Silvernail stated, to her knowledge, since 2003. Commissioner Cruz, asked ghat percent of the total funding comes from the CDBG program. Ms. Silvernail explained the Kitchen requested $65,000. It receives $10,000 from the School District, generates approximately $40,000. Commissioner Cruz asked if this was better than in the past, is there a-trend showing improvement. Ms. Silvernail stated yes, there is a very good improvement. Item 6: Downtown Fa_ade Improvement 4 facades) ($80,000) Gloria Garcia, Interim Director for PDDA, noted the PDDA is working with some downtown business owners to promote the fagade program.. The Association hopes to complete 8 fagade projects underway by November. Chairman Samuel asked what the matching funds were. Ms. Garcia, stated the loan is capped at $20,000. A deposit of $500 for good faith is received by the business. The split is 75% CDBG, and 25% owner, which is forgiven over 7 years. Chairman Samuel asked how many facades have been completed to date. Ms. Garcia answered two, Mi Hacienda and Mexi-Muebles. Item 7: Enemy Efficient Home Program 8 households ($20,000) David Odom, Benton-Franklin CAC, has been doing operating this program for many years. They are requesting $20,000 that will be matched with funds from the State energy "Matchmaker" program. They hope to complete 8 maybe 10 homes this year inside the city limits. The program is designed to protect the families, make homes energy efficient, and deal with mold. Vice Chairman Samuel asked if they planned on doing 10 houses this year. Mr. Odom stated 8 houses. Vice Chairman Samuel asked if it was for 8 last year also and if there would be a problem meeting that amount. Mr. Odom responded that they actually ended up with a lot more energy assistance this year, for about 600 homes in Benton and Franklin Counties. Commissioner Cruz asked how many homes were done over the last 5 years. Mr. Odom stated 600 in Benton and Franklin County, at least 300 were here. Item 9: Habitat for Humanity Brush With Kindness ($24,000) Theresa Richardson, Executive Director for Habitat for Humanity presented the Brush With Kindness project. It is an opportunity to improve affordable housing and revitalize neighborhoods and an extension of what Habitat does nation- wide. The project would provide exterior home repair and painting along with minor landscaping, and serve elderly, disabled and low--income families who have challenges maintaining their homes. This project is seeking seed money to serve 8 households in Census Tract 202. Habitat for Humanity develops community engagement very well. This project hopes to engage kids in the neighborhood to give them some skills during the summer and pride in their neighborhood. Valspar Paints donates all the paint. Other community partners provide incentive gifts to the kids for coming out. They hope that this will be the last time to seek funding. The goal is to engage the corporate community to take this project on a larger scale. Projects are designed to be 1-3 days long as opposed to 3 months. Chairman Samuel asked if there was a minimum dollar amount where this project would not be able to move forward. Ms. Richardson, stated the request is for $24,000 for costs of materials and administration to get the project moving with 8 projects, but they would be happy with whatever they could get. They hope to partner with other City projects maximizing funding available for interior repairs, by providing the "icing on the cake". Chairman Samuel asked if half the money would only do half the projects. Ms. Richardson answered possibly. They are just launching this program so it could possibly work out that way. Item 10: Elijah Family Homes -- Continue to Step-up ($182,000) Barbara Puigh, President of Elijah Family Homes and CPA for LeMaster-Daniels present the proposal for Elijah Family Homes. Elijah Family Homes provides rental subsidies for special needs families. They are requesting $182,000 to purchase a 3-bedroom duplex to provide affordable housing for very low income families with barriers to obtaining housing assistance. Elijah Family Homes concentrates on families because positive families impact every part of the community. This impact shows in positive changes in the schools, Health District, Headstart, Police and the Courts. To qualify the family must have children under the age of 18, and income levels at or below 50% of the median income. Most have been lower, and they must have been turned by Public Housing. Families average 3 or more children. This will provide housing for families for a number of years. Chairman Samuel asked how many years have you been operating? Ms. Puigh answered since May of 2005, originally as a ministry of Christ the King. They became a 501(c)(3) in 2007. Chairman Samuel asked how many families have been helped in that time. Ms. Puigh answered 16 families, some have been with them two years or more, some have moved on in positive ways, some have not. The relapse rate for Meth is 70%, Elijah Family Homes has had a 70% success rate. Chairman Samuel asked if they had half the amount would they do half the project? Ms. Puigh answered that it would be hard to put a family out there by, themselves if they've only been clean a year or so. Chairman Samuel asked if $90,000 would be problematic. Ms. Puigh answered that it would be, but our Board might say "yes". It is really important to own 4 units or more to qualify for Washington Families fund which gives case management for 10 years. Putting a roof over a head is not enough,, they can't successfully move forward without it. Item 11: Jericho Road. Ministries Havensafe (15 bed spaces for DV) {$288,000) Amy Schultz, Director of Jericho Road Ministries, which is a crisis ministry that helps people in need in the local Tri-Cities area and in the smaller surrounding communities. They have been working in partnership with City of Pasco DVRU and helping domestic violence victims. They are pursuing a way to establish a safehouse in West Pasco to increase 15 bed spaces in the community as a resource for families experiencing domestic violence. Kim Kelch, Domestic Violence Services Coordinator for Pasco Police Department, her primary function is to address domestic violence issues in our community. This partnership came together because of a need for victims of family violence in the community. The City has a need shown by Council goals developed to address this issue. As of last year, the first full calendar year of tracking calls, there were 1,137 calls received, 555 arrests, and 401 households where children were present at the time violence was happening. Chairman Samuel asked if this was in Pasco. Ms. Kelch replied this was just within the city limits of Pasco. This proposal is to provide an option within our community. The regional domestic violence shelter is not in Pasco and it places a hardship on victims in Pasco who must leave their community and support system. The issue being addressed is the "intimate partner" barrier. The language the current shelter operates under limits assistance "intimate partner" domestic violence. According to the Washington State laws, family violence includes teenaged children assaulting their parents, adult children assaulting their elderly parents, and roommates assaulting each other, e.g. 17-year old mother who is assaulted by her father and threatened with death. There were no resources available for her, law enforcement spent over two hours trying to facilitate a placement for her. Chairman Samuel asked where the shelter was located. Ms. Kelch replied that it was in a confidential location. She, as an advocate, is able to transport victims directly to the shelter, but law enforcement is not permitted to transport there. Staying in this community means that the victim maintains access to their transportation, schools, stores, etc. The idea is to provide temporary transitional housing, the ideal goal is for a weekend or few days stay until the locks can be changed and protection orders placed, so the victim and children can remain in their household. The partnership between the faith-based organization and the DVRU provides a winning combination for the care and safety of domestic violence victims. Chairman Samuel asked if they received half the money if they would be able to serve half population. Ms. Kelch stated that in this case the answer would be "no". They would have to continue to do fundraising to finish it because the facility must to be a certain size, and laid out a certain way to facilitate the programs needed and provide the space to ensure the safety of clientele housed. It would slow the progress down. Chairman Samuel asked if not getting funds would stop the program. Ms. Kelch answered, "No, it would significantly slow it down." Chairman Samuel asked if it were possible to show impact with a reduced allocation to $30,000 or $40,000. Ms. Kelch answered that it would be the first step toward identifying a property. Part of the reason of looking at a new structure is the opportunity to have security systems hardwired in. This is intended to be a partnership and resource within the community. Chairman Samuel asked if they received $30,000 if they could come back next year and show tangible what the funding was used for and its impact. Ms. Kelch answered, "Absolutely." Item 8: Community Housing Improvement Program - Minor Household Repair, (10 homes) ($20,000) Mr. Angie Pitman, Block Grant Administrator, presented the request for $20,000 for minor household repair to fill a gap covered existing housing rehabilitation and repair projects. Stating that this would provide funding for projects that may be not be served by volunteer organizations and may require hiring a contractor to complete. Item 13: Boys & Girls Club - Exterior Lighting & Security System ($55,000) Mr. Ron McHenry, Boys & Girls Club Vice President of Finance, presented the proposal for safety enhancements at the facility. Currently there are two 60-watt light bulbs at the entrance and trees fronting the building that block out natural light. The walk from the parking lot to the building, especially in winter becomes treacherous. The side facing Edgar Brown Stadium has no lighting, so during the summer months there is a lot of graffiti because there isn't any way to see what is going on. This is a little bit of lighting on the south and north sides and don't get any graffiti there. This request is not for replacing fixtures that are broken and old, but the building was not built for lighting in these areas. In addition to this, they are requesting a security system be retrofitted to provide for improve communications. There have been SWAT teams with assault rifles drawn within eyesight in twice in the last year. Program staff carries "walkies" but in a cement building the message doesn't get through when you are trying to get 180 kids who are noisy into classrooms and away from windows. The requested funding would provide an integrated system that provides monitors in each room, it would be able to put the whole building in lock-down visually. Item 12: Boys & Girls Club - Tween Center Design ($17,5001 Mr. Ron McHenry, Boys & Girls Club Vice President of Finance, presented the proposal for architectural design for a Tween Center. Currently, the facility serves kids preschool through 5th grade. They also have a Teen Center in the Navy Homes area that serves kids in grades 61h through 121h. Most parents will not allow their middle-school kids to go to the Teen Center. As a result there are good kids with nothing to do that end up being the cause for most of the graffiti. The plan is to design a 3,000 square foot outbuilding directly north of the gymnasium, out of the line of sight, and specifically designed for 61h through 8th graders. The current campus already has a gym and a kitchen and 80 more kids can be easily served at this location because they don't need to put in a lot of plumbing or a gym. The building would provide a learning space of their own with age appropriate activities. The security system requested above would provide a means to communicate between the two buildings. The design will be split into three areas to maintain light of sight requirements. Another feature they hope to add is a dental facility. A sister club in King County recently did this. We would be able to provide free dental exams to all the kids. Requesting the funding in phases allows the Club to go after additional grants and funding to defray the costs. The Boys 8s Girls Club will provide $15,000 to $20,000 to outfit the building in addition to increasing their operating costs by $60,000 to about $90,000 per year. He closed with an illustration of the impact the staff has had on one of the new kids at the facility. Commissioner Little asked if they considered partnering with CBC's dental program. Mr. McHenry responded they are working on that. Item 14: Administrative 8s Community Services - Lucas Park Playground Renovation ($60,000) Mr. Stan Strebel presented a proposal for replacement of the last piece of noncompliant play equipment in a city park. Lucas Park is in a neighborhood of approximately 60% low to moderate income population. This request would allow them to replace the equipment and the fall-zone under the equipment and provide accessibility. Chairman Samuel asked if total funding were not provided what would happen. Mr. Strebel replied that they would wait another year or until funding were again available. Item 15: Code Enforcement Officer ($48,000) Mr. Rick White, Community & Economic Development Director reported that this request is to pay partial salary expenses for code enforcement officers operating in Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204. The goal is to prevent property nuisances, community-wide blight and fire hazards in those areas as well as providing an educational component. Chairman Samuel asked if this was a change from last year. Mr. White replied that it is not. Item 16: Kurtzman Park Phase.11 ($300,000) Mr. Rick White presented the application for the engineering division for a bricks and mortar project in the Kurtzman neighborhood. It is the result of a planning process that began in 2007 and has progressed to the point where parameters are being outlined for a Local Improvement District in that area using funds that have been committed through various sources since year 2000. It will provide curb, gutter, sidewalks, streetlights and in some cases utility improvements in the Kurtzman Park neighborhood area, Census Tract 201. Chairman Samuel asked that even with the growth of Pasco we continue to get around $600,000-$700,000. Is there any way to get more funding. Ms. Pitman replied that the allocation is determined by what is budgeted by Congress and the formula. Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing. Dave Cortinas, residing at 1807 W Yakima, owner and publisher of La Voz Hispanic newspaper located at 710 N 4th Avenue. When he saw the advertisement in his newspaper regarding allocation of the 2010 CDBG funds, he wanted to speak. In hearing the presentations he noted that there are many success stories. With success stories, come good administrators who operate those funds. He is asking that no more funds be given to the Pasco Downtown Development Association and discussed his reasoning why. He suggested the funding be given to an organization with administration to carry it out. He stated that he hoped in the future to be an applicant for the funding. Chairman Samuel asked if his position were that the PDDA is beyond repair? Mr. Cortinas responded that he served on the board for one year and felt that his time and efforts would be better spent elsewhere. He thought their heart is in the right place, but the administration, leadership, and knowledgeable business is not there. Mr. McHenry thanked the Planning Commission for their service to the community being here for five hours tonight. After three calls the public hearing was closed. Chairman Samuel asked if there were any further comments from staff. There being none. Commissioner Cruz requested a copy of the spreadsheet be emailed to the commission for their recommendations. REGULAR MEETING July 16, 2009 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING B: CDBG 2_010 Annual Action Plan (City Wide) (MF# CDBG09-0041 Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from staff. Angela Pitman, Block Grant Administrator stated there were presentations from the applicants at the public hearing on July 16, 2009. The purpose for the CDBG program is to develop viable communities by expanding economic opportunities and providing a suitable living environment and decent housing within the city of Pasco. Eligible activities must meet one of the three national objectives which are to primarily benefit low to moderate income persons, aid in the preventions or elimination of slum and blight, or meet an urgent need, and must also comply with CDBG regulations at 24CFR570. There is an estimated $665,000 to be available from the 2010 entitlement and from reallocation of prior year activities. There are 16 proposals received totaling $1,392,000 which leaves a deficit of $727,000. Staff recommendations were provided and broke down by activity type. Administrative activity is limited to 20% of the entitlement plus 20% of the current year's program income. Public services activity is limited to 15% of the entitlement plus 15% of the prior year's program income. Economic development activities were also listed. HUD likes to see the funding leveraged not using 100% of CDBG funds for a project, but other funding being added to it as well. Chairman Samuel asked for comments from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Cruz stated by reviewing this and listening to testimony we need to look at the current state of the economy and the kind of people that are affected negatively by the economy and will benefit from these kinds of proposals. He is in favor of a significant reduction from the staff recommendation for CDBG Program Administration of$120,000 to $80,000. The city should take on more of the burden to fund this instead of using CDBG money to fund Administration. He also stated the Code Enforcement officer funding should be revisited and would prefer that the money be used for ,prevention versus the back-end solution with Code Enforcement. Commissioner Schouviller stated he agrees with Commissioner Cruz on the reduction of the CDBG Program Administration and Code Enforcement Officer, as well as the Continuing to Step Up, and Neighborhood Improvements -Phase 11. He is wondering why there is no funding being approved for the Benton Franklin CAC -Home Energy program. He would also like to see funding for the Boys & Girls Club external lighting and security system camera and monitor. Commissioner Little questioned for comment on why there is no funding for the Boys 8a Girls external lighting and security system camera and monitor. Staff stated there are some portions of the application that may be ineligible per CDBG regulations and would need time to research that. In addition, there is a lot of other funding that will go to the facility. Mr. 'White further added the Boys & Girls Club is receiving approximately $162,000 through the ARRA program or in the event of HUD technicalities money will be shifted from current programs to the Boys & Girls Club and the ARRA money will be shifted back to the program where the money was retrieved from. The CAC Home Energy application is in the same boat, they have submitted stimulus money for their energy programs and there is a real doubt if they have the capability to carry out their programs this year due to they are project poor and money rich, so to speak. They are at capacity with their projects and funding. The CDBG Program Administration funding is important and is money that if not taken from the CDBG program, it will then be made up from the City of Pasco general taxpayer. The Code Enforcement Officer request is a value driven preventative program. It's the broken window theory, if the window breaks and it doesn't get fixed then there is another house with a broken window, etc. The Code Enforcement Officer is focused in Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 & 204 specifically for the area wide benefit that occurs in those low to moderate areas. Chairman Samuel stated he would like to hear comments from staff on their recommendation for the Lucas Park Playground.. Staff stated this is the only playground equipment within the City that is not in compliance, more importantly it will help replace the play mat which is a safety issue. Chairman Samuel stated $60,000 for replacing equipment that is still in fairly good shape could be used for other items. Commissioner Cruz stated there may be, a liability issue with having non- compliant equipment. Chairman Samuel stated he would be 'in favor if the equipment was in bad shape.. Commissioner Kempf questioned why there was no recommendation for Brush with Kindness. Staff stated they ran short on funding, providing there were more funds available this project would be funded. There is a lot of money for housing type projects from other sources and there are certain things that can be done with CDBG funds. Rehabilitation is acceptable, maintenance is not and this application is for materials and labor as well as cleaning up the yard, etc., elements of which may be maintenance and therefore ineligible. Chairman Samuel would like to see Brush with Kindness funded and clarified if CDBG Program Administration was reduced the citizens of Pasco would have to pay for the balance. Commissioner Cruz stated he is amazed on the quality of the City's money management. He would like to focus more on investment kinds of things rather than administrative and other things, if we have to take a bite out of the other pie then ok. Commissioner Rose mentioned he would like to see progress with program's such as the Code Enforcement Officer. Chairman Samuel states there is a citizens committee that oversees what the Code Enforcement is doing and can make recommendations to City Council with regard to how Code Enforcement is executed. Commissioner Rose questioned if Code Enforcement issues are .dependent on citizen complaints or do they canvass the neighborhoods. Staff stated Code Enforcement surveys neighborhoods and will send Courtesy Notices to locations that are in violation. Commissioner Rose stated there is a large amount of weeds in vacant lots and wants to know if they wait to hear from complaining neighbors or do they canvass the city. Staff stated they have gone from four officers to three and the complaint system is backlogged constantly. If they get a complaint from an area, they gather all the complaints in that neighborhood and address those issues. Mr. White further stated the Code Enforcement team was reduced by one officer and in that time the number of reported cases have doubled. In the winter, staff is reduced by two to canvass the city for dog licensing. Commissioner Cruz further stated he would like to see these funds used in other' areas. As a former Code Board member, he mentioned two types of issues where citizens that are in violation of the city code, one is the neighbor that does not want to maintain his yard and has weeds; the other is the family that has medical reasons and has financial hardships. Chairman Samuel stated he is on the Franklin County law justice council and there is a chart that shows the number of law enforcement officials and the crime rate in the City of Pasco and over the last 15 years the law enforcement officials has significantly increased and the crime rate has decreased. He stated if we had more Code Enforcement Officers we would see a cleaner city, more responsive to complaints city. Commissioner Cruz again stated he feels this is a back end solution and would prefer to provide resources and assistance versus being listed on the Code Enforcement list. Commissioner Hay stated staff has prepared recommendations and,is in favor of moving forward with the staff recommendations. Commissioner Schouviller stated he is also in favor of moving forward. Commissioner Cruz further stated he is not in favor of moving forward and would rather take the time to discuss each item. Chairman Samuel stated he is disappointed that Habitat for Humanity was not even considered for funding after their third year of applying and also the application for Brush of Kindness. He would like to see a decrease even zero the request for the Lucas Park playground equipment and re-allot the money to Brush with Kindness or the Neighborhood Improvements - Phase II. This would improve things as suggested by Commissioner Cruz with the Code Enforcement_ issues, Commissioner Rose stated he agrees with Chairman Samuel on the Lucas. Park playground equipment. Chairman Samuel amended the motion to include changes as follows: zero funds for the Lucas Park equipment and redistribute the money as $24,000 to Brush with Kindness with $ 36,000 to Neighborhoods Improvements - Phase II. Commissioner Rose further stated he is in favor of Chairman Samuel and seconds the motion to amend the first motion. Chairman Samuel called for a roll call for the vote: Hay -- no, Schouviller - yes, Kempf - no, Samuel - yes, Little - yes, Rose - yes, Cruz - no, Perez - yes. The motion passed with 5 members voting yes and 3 members voting no. The Planning Commission passed the recommendation with the following changes: Brush with Kindness $24,000, Lucas Park Playground equipment $0, and $36,000 to Neighborhoods Improvements - Phase II. AGENDA REPORT NO. 29 FOR: City Council August 20, 2009 TO: Gary Crutchfield, ager Robert J. Alberts, P i c orks Director FROM: Michael McSh ity Engineer Workshop: 08/24/09 SUBJECT: Locai Improvement District(LID) 147 - Create LID for California Avenue & Bonneville Street I: REFERENCE(S); i Vicinity Map Street Cross Section II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL / STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 08/24: Discussion, 111. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) These roads are part of the Oregon Avenue Circulation Plan created August 1997 by Resolution Number 2337. These two roads need to be built to allow access to the properties so they can be developed and are some of the last streets needing to be completed under the circulation plan. B) Prior to the Council presentation, staff mailed a notice to the property owners setting a date for a neighborhood meeting on Tuesday, June 9, 2009 to discuss the project. No property owners were in attendance. Staff has since had telephone contact with 5 of the nine property owners (one being the City of Pasco's Highland Park) and has found that they are not opposed to the LID. Staff currently has I signed interest survey that was returned from the initial mailing. C) In 2000 LID 135 was formed to make roadway improvements to Spokane, Superior and Salt Lake Streets east of Oregon Avenue just north of this proposal. This LID and LID 144 (Road 90 & 92 Improvements) in 2008 were initiated by the City with solicitation to the property owners with regard to interest. V. DISCUSSION; A) A project needs to be created to complete California Avenue and Bonneville Street in the Oregon Avenue area. This project would abut nine (9) parcels and facilitate development. Staff proposes the City move forward with the public hearing in order to determine interest similar to LID's 135 and 144. The improvements would consist of a 28 feet wide roadway and street lighting system. Additional paving (up to 38 feet total road width), curb, gutters, sidewalks and storm water retention would be added to those properties with existing business or other uses. As other properties developed they would be required to complete the remaining improvements. This is consistent with the improvements done in LID 135 to the north. The proposed LID boundary includes parcels that are zoned commercial. Due to the variation in parcel sizes, the proposed LID would be .based on, front footage and area charges. 4(f) LID 147 CALIFORNIA AVENUE AND BONNEVILLE STREET r, ' JAMES 3T PROJECTAREA LEWIS ST: 'A" ST VICINITY MAP wQ � U w z C� V) Z w m >- M wm � U V) w Q w I > 4 w O �- z w O > � w > w M Ct) w V) 8d cn m w O > (-Y U Z w � � w w _ V) �, Z U N 0 0 � LL --- °a. Q T U w IL O � Q M O m m N co (, w Q � U w IL Q C7 N Z La.1 m >- :m I w m VO U J V) > 0 I - --_------------- --•- s �- - - --- --- AGENDA REPORT NO. 26 FOR:.. City Council DATE: August 6,2009 TO: Gary Crutchfie , City r Robert J. Alb � , t s Director v FROM: Michael McSh ,�ity Engineer Workshop Mtg.: 08/24/09 Regular Mtg.: 09/08/09 SUBJECT: Parking Ordinance Revision �. REFERENCE(S): I. Map 2. Ordinance 11. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 08/24: Discussion 09/08: MOTION: l move to adopt Ordinance No. adding parking restrictions on certain streets, and further, authorize publication by summary only. 111. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) Due to recently constructed areas around Pasco School District high schools a review and update of the parking ordinance was necessary. Staff reviewed these areas and is recommending additional restrictions. Also, some recommendations are for newly constructed streets. V. DISCUSSION: A) This ordinance amends Section 10.56.080 (Schedule III, Parking Prohibited at All Times on Certain Streets) of the Pasco Municipal Codes to add the following streets to the list of prohibited parking streets. No Parking on Both Sides: Argent Road--Road 84 to Road 76 Road 84—Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard 8) This ordinance amends Section 10.56.090 (Schedule lip—Parking Prohibited During Certain Hours on Certain Streets) of the Pasco Municipal Codes to revise the following street to the list of prohibited parking streets. I Oth Avenue(Henry to Mamie Court, west side) 4(g) LyVAY - � 1141)UST1 1LR�AD A " 1 oxo o / C5 Po cn �J dxU � RI , , � y o / _ z , r �f r r CK r � + f r r , I r r + r i 111 + r + ^� _ r r i r � o J r W � , r r � r , � i U C7 '--+Tj r I It 68 avog ' r r i I 11 • u • - • ra �I�: , • ••� 11 ��•7111.�911L�E:\���C-_1�a111Y:11:c�•-�aranr:uU•-I IL•i•]!J�L•J�■f7[�71�J\■r��Jr��i/�111• - • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE prohibiting parking on various streets, and amending Section 10.56.080 of the Pasco Municipal Code. WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has determined that it is necessary for public safety to prohibit parking on certain streets;NOW,THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 10.56.080 of the Pasco Municipal Code is amended to add the following underlined language and read as follows: '10.56.080 SCHEDULE III - PARKING PROHIBITED AT ALL TIMES ON CERTAIN, STREETS. In accordance with Section 10.56.030, and when signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall at any time park a vehicle upon any of the following described streets or parts of streets: "A" Street- both sides of street from Elm Avenue to SR-12; "A" Street- both sides of street from Ninth Avenue to Eleventh Avenue; "A" Street- from Main Avenue to Beech Avenue; "A" Street- 300 feet west of 4th Avenue to three hundred feet east of 4th Avenue; "A" Street - both sides from 20th Avenue to a point two hundred fifty feet west of 20th Avenue; "A" Street—both sides, corner of"A" Street and 28th Avenue; Agate Street-between Fourth and Fifth Avenues; Ainsworth Avenue-north side from Railroad Avenue to Oregon Avenue; Ainsworth Avenue- south side from 10th Avenue to Fourth Avenue; Argent Road—20th Avenue to Road 44; Ar ent Road—Road 84 to Road 76; Autoplex Way—from Court Street south to 160 feet north of Marie Street; Bonneville Street - the south side of Bonneville Street from a point 150 feet east of the east curb line of 10th Avenue to the east curb line of 10th Avenue; Billings Street- from Lewis Street to "A" Street Broadmoor Boulevard—FCID canal to Nottingham Drive; Brown Street-north side from Road 28 to Road 26; Brown Street- south side from Road 28 to a point 130 feet to the east; Burden Boulevard—Road 76 to Road 36; Chapel Hill Boulevard—Road 68 to Saratoga Lane; Chapel Hill Boulevard —Broadmoor Boulevard to Road 84; Chapel Hill Boulevard-from Cresent Road to Broadmoor Boulevards Clark Street- both sides of street from Ninth Avenue to Eleventh Avenue; Clemente Lane—Burden Boulevard to Wrigley Drive; Commercial Avenue—both sides from Hillsboro Avenue south 1 mile; Court Street- from Fourth Avenue west to SR-395; Court Street— east of Fourth Avenue; Court Street- from Road 68 to Road 84; Court Street—Rd. 100 to I-182 Hwy overpass; Court Street— 1,000 feet south of Harris Road; E. Broadway Street—(north side) Wehe Street to Franklin Street; First Avenue—Court Street to Sylvester Street; Fourth Avenue—(east side) 50 feet north of Columbia Street; Fourth Avenue— 100 feet south of Columbia Street; Fourth Avenue - east side from Shoshone Street to Court Street; and on the west side from Shoshone Street to 125 feet north of vacated Park Street and from 115 feet north of Octave Street to Court Street; Fourth Avenue - east side from Sylvester Street north 140.feet; and on the west side from Sylvester Street north 200 feet; Fifth Avenue (west side) Park to Octave; Fifth Avenue—(east side) north of Court Street; Fifth Avenue - (east side)Nixon Street to Park Street; North Fourth Avenue -between Court and Ruby Streets; Heritage Boulevard-both sides from US-12 to "A" Street; Hillsboro Street and Commercial Avenue - both sides of Hillsboro Street from a point 100 feet east of the center line of Commercial Avenue to SR 395, and on both sides of Commercial Avenue from a point 100 feet south of the center line of Hillsboro to Hillsboro; Jay Street - north side from the east curb line of Road 22 to a point 50 feet west of the east curb line of Road 22; Lewis Street - from First Avenue to 70 feet east; Lewis Street- ninth Avenue to Eleventh Avenue; Lewis Street - north side of Lewis Street from the east curb Iine of Seventh Avenue to a point 135 feet east; Lewis Street - South side of Lewis Street, from 150 feet east of the center line of First Street running easterly a distance of 165 feet; Lewis Street(east) -both sides from Wehe Avenue east to Cedar Avenue; Lewis Street(east) -both sides from Oregon Avenue east to Wehe Avenue; Lewis Street—from Cedar Ave. to Billings Street; Madison Avenue -both sides from Burden Boulevard to Road 442 Ninth Avenue—Washington Street to Ainsworth Street; Octave Street - the south side of Octave Street from 1 point 280 feet east of the east curb line of Road 34 to a point 420 feet east of the east curb line of Road 34; Oregon Avenue between "A" Street and Ainsworth Avenue; Oregon Avenue—(west side)350 feet north of Bonneville Street; Oregon Avenue—Hagerman Street to James Street; Road 22 - east side from the north curb line of Jay Street to a point 50 feet south of the_ north curb line of Jay Street; Road 26—from Court Street to Brown Street Road 28 —west side from Sylvester Street to Brown Street; Road 28— east side from Sylvester Street to Brown Street except for 315 feet starting from a-point 360 feet north of the intersection of Sylvester Street and Road 28; Road 34 -,both sides of the street from Henry Street to Court Street; Road 36 - both sides of the street from its intersection with Argent Place to a point 1,200 feet north of Argent Place; Road 36—Burden Boulevard.to 200 feet south of Meadow Beauty Drive; Road 44- east side from Meadow View Street to Argent Place; Road 44- west side from Desert Street to Argent Place; Road 44—west side from Desert Street to Burden Boulevard; Road 44—Burden Boulevard to Sandifer Boulevard; Road 52—Burden Boulevard to Sandifur Boulevard; Road 60—Burden Boulevard to Sandifur Boulevard; Road 68 Place—Burden Boulevard to Sandifur Boulevard; Road 68—FCID canal north to City Limits; Road 68—I-182 to Sandifur Boulevard; Road 76- east side from Sandifur Parkway to a point 620 feet south of Wrigley Drive; Road 76 - (west side) Wrigley Drive to Burden Boulevard; Road 76- west side from Sandifur Parkway to Wrigley Drive; Road 80 - from Court Street south; Road 84- from Sunset Lane south; Road 84—Argent Road to Chapel Hill Boulevard; Road 100—Court Street to FCID canal; Rodeo Drive—Road 68 to Convention Place; Ruby Street -between Fourth and Fifth Avenues; Sandifur Boulevard—Broadmoor Boulevard to Robert Wayne Drive; Sandifur Boulevard—(north side) Robert Wayne Drive to Road 60; Sandifur Boulevard—from Road 60 to Road 62; Sandifur Parkway-from Road 60 to Road 44; Seventeenth Avenue- (west side) "A" Street to Washington Street; Shoshone Street-22nd Avenue to 23rd Avenue; Sun Willows Boulevard - both sides of street from its intersection with 20th Avenue to its eastern terminus; Sylvester Street—(south side) 20th Avenue to 28th Avenue; Sylvester Street—(north side) one hundred feet east of 26th Avenue to 28th Avenue; Sylvester Street -From the east line of 20th Avenue to a point 290 feet east thereof, Tenth Avenue -both sides of street from"A" Street to `B" Street; Tenth Avenue - from "B" Street to and including the Inter-City Bridge; Tenth Avenue -both sides of street from Lewis Street to Clark Street; Third Avenue—(east side) fifty feet south of Columbia Street; Third Avenue- (east side) fifty feet north of Columbia Street; Third Avenue--(west side)thirty feet north of Sylvester Street; Third Avenue - On the west side from a point five hundred seventy-five feet north -of' Margaret Street to a point six hundred fifty feet north of Margaret Street; Twentieth Avenue — From Lewis Street to Argent Road except on the east side of 20th Avenue only from a point one hundred seventy feet south of Hopkins Street to Lewis Street. Twenty Eight Avenue—(west side) Lewis Street to Sylvester Street; Washington Street—9th Avenue to 10th Avenue; Wrigley Drive—Road 76 to Clemente Lane; Road 26 - Both sides of Road 26, from a point 120 feet south of the south curb line of Court Street on the east side and 245 feet south of Court Street on the west side, to 250 feet north of the north curbline of Court Street. (Ord. 3774, 2006; Ord. 3750 Sec. 1, 2005; Ord. 3694 Sec 1, 2004; Ord. 3668 Sec 1, 2004; Ord. 3619 Sec 1, 2003; Ord. 3549 Sec. 1, 2002; Ord. 3176 Sec. 1, 1996; Ord. 2969, Sec. 1, 1993; Ord. 2964, Sec. 1, 1993; Ord. 2930 Sec. 1, 1993; Ord. 2918 Sec. 1, 1993; Ord. 2898 Sec. 1, 1992; Ord. 2895 Sec. 1, 1992; Ord. 2888 See. 1, 1992; Ord. 2832 Sec. 1, 1991, Ord. 2812 Sec. 1, 1991; Ord. 2748 Sec. 1, 1989; Ord. 2747 Sec. 1, 1989; Ord. 2732 Sec. 1, 1989; Ord. 2720 Sec. 1, 1989; Ord. 2698 Sec. 1, 1988; Ord. 2657 Sec. 1, 1987; Ord. 2656 Sec. 1, 1987; Ord. 2655 Sec. 1, 1987; Ord. 2654 Sec. 1, 1987; Ord. 2645 Sec. 1, 1987; Ord. 2615 Sec. 1, 1986; Ord. 2614 Sec. 1, 1986; Ord. 2571 Sec. 1, 1985; Ord. 2534 Sec. 1, 1985; Ord. 2496 Sec. 1, 1984; Ord. 2433 Sec. 1, 1983; Ord. 2407 Sec. 1, 1982; Ord. 2403 Sec. 1, 1982; Ord. 2354 Sec. 1, 1982; Ord. 2207 Sec. 1, 1980; Ord. 2197 Sec. 1, 1980; Ord. 2131 Sec. 1, 1980; Ord. 2108 Sec. 1, 1979; Ord. 2058 Sec. 1, 1979; Ord. 1999 Sec. 4, 1978; Ord. 1943 Sec. 1, 1978; Ord. 1,939 Sec. 1, 1978; Ord. 1808. Sec. 1, 1976; prior code Sec. 8-42.12.) Section 2. Section 10.56.090 of the Pasco. Municipal Code. is amended to revise the following language and read as follows: 10.56.090 SCHEDULE IV - PARKING PROHIBITED DURING CERTAIN HOURS ON CERTAIN STREETS. In accordance with Section 10.56.040, and when signs are erected giving notice thereof, no persons shall park a vehicle on the days or between the hours specified herein on any street within the district or upon any of the streets or parts of streets as follows: DISTRICT PROHIBITED 3rd (Clark south to alley, west side) All times (except Sundays and public holidays) Court Street (south side) 10th Avenue All times (except Sundays to 14th Avenue and public holidays) 1.0th Avenue(Henry to lie Court, west side) 8 a.m. -5 p.m. school days 18th Avenue from Park to Henry, 8 a.m. -5 p.m., (except Sundays and public holidays) 10`h Avenue (east side for a distance of All times (except Sundays 125 feet south of the south curb line of and public holidays) Brown Street East Lewis Place (both sides) from 6 a.m. -- 6 p.m. Saturdays its east terminus west 2,842 feet and Sundays (Ord. 3791, 2006; Ord. 3774, 2006; Ord. 2640 Sec. 1, 1987; Ord. 2"138 Sec. I, 19801; Ord. 1793 Sec. 4, 1976; prior code Sec. 8-42.16.) Section I This Ordinance shall take effect five (5)days after passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this ,day of September, 2009. Joyce Olson Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark Leland B. Kerr City Clerk City Attorney CITY OF PASCO SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE NO. is an ordinance amending section 10.56.080 "Schedule III — Parking prohibited at all times on certain streets" and 10.56.090 "Schedule IV --- Parking prohibited During Certain Hours on Certain Streets) of the Pasco Municipal Code to prohibit parking on various streets. The full text of Ordinance No. is available free of charge and will be mailed (electronically or via postal service) to any person who requests it from the City Clerk of the City of Pasco (509) 545-3402, PO Box 293, Pasco, WA 99301. Debbie Clark, City Clerk AGENDA REPORT NO. 24 FOR: City Council DATE: August 6, 2009 TO: Gary CrutchfielA Cit ger Robert J. Alber ),rks Director G FROM:. Michael McShl ity Engineer "Workshop Mtg.: 08/24/09 Regular Mtg.: 09/08/09 SUBJECT: Angle Parking Ordinance Revision I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Map 2. Ordinance II, ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 08/24: Discussion 09/08: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , adding, removing and revising various street locations for angled parking, and further, authorize publication by summary only, III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) A recent request by Franklin County PUD to add angle parking on Bonneville across from their new addition, currently under construction. Also, a review of existing angle parking indicated an update was needed to reflect current conditions. V. DISCUSSION: A) This ordinance amends Section 10.48.020 (Markings Indicating Angle Parking) of the Pasco Municipal Code to add, remove and revise the following locations to. the list of streets where angle parking may be permitted. Add: Bonneville,North side from 14th Ave to 15th Ave Add: Bonneville, North side from 14th Ave East 300 feet Add: Bonneville, South side from 14th Ave East 230 feet Add: Hopkins, North side from 14th Ave East 250 feet Add: Hopkins, South side from 14th Ave East 180 feet Add: Shoshone, South side from 14th Ave East 130 feet Add: Shoshone,North side from 10th Ave West 315 feet Add: Irving, South side from 14th Ave to 15th Ave (Head-in) Add: Irving,North side from 10th Ave to 12th Ave. Add: 10th, West side from Nixon to Sylvester(Head-in and Angled) Add: Ainsworth, from 11th Ave East 130 feet Add: 9th Ave East side from"B" St North 300' (Head-in) Add: S 6th Ave from Columbia South 170 feet Add : N 4th Ave, from Clark to Columbia Remove: S 5th Ave, East side from Lewis St to Columbia St Remove: S 6th Ave, from "A" St to "B" St Remove: N 7th Ave, from Shoshone South 200 feet 4(h) Remove: S 11th Ave, East side from "B" St to Ainsworth Remove: Park St, from 4th Ave to 5th Ave Remove: Yakima, North side from 12th Ave to 14th Ave Revise: Nixon, South side from 7th Ave East One half blo k to 5th Ave Revise: Nixon, South side from 3rd Ave East to 1ve One-half block Revise: Yakima, South side from 10th Ave West to 12th 245 feet Revise: Sylvester,North side from 11 th Ave 10th Ave to 12th Ave Revise: Columbia, North side from 7th Ave West to 9th Ave 560 feet Revise: N 12th Ave, West side from Sylvester South to A41ey Irving Revise: N. 12th Avenue, West side from Sylvester, North to Nixon Revise: N 9th Ave from Clark to Columbi Lewis lw 3 AM= 3AV MY m3 Di 3AY co a # r N d —_W 3AY 33B III Bf � 3AY 3H3M A AIE G rr `\ g 3AY , y� G Nil \ \V 1 ` 3V 3A U� r \ A w � f G G M F v s 3AV aj �N Y H R B v Hl HlOi \ N f 2M, �t V Hl L 3AV HltI cr r 3AV Hl L N� L � L V HiTt a V 1 3AV H18 3 am Nte twlu, l HL O W H�loz jAV 1 l Y tj 3AV ONZZ G / ` Z W w r 3AV UNZZ ¢¢ 3AV NCZ J j W wK 7M I.R 3.«� ~J _ 3AV H19 ufl 3AV q 3Ab H].4Z 3AV H1BZ I Z z J n ld ONZ£ I- f� Z 0 n avoa ��•._ s td ZL M£ av02 it i O D U 118 1VAR q Ii N 6t avoa Y SC v£ aVOM i CD �l . .. . -� • . AIM: ]T•T•Sii iltihjiri�i 9Ii �F.1�dhi� 1u . X- ill:ITI:119 :111011<K9]O1TLQ IATA 161LWJ\Mid UZmill]II IS]lzi--lzis ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE permitting angle parking on various streets, and amending Section 10.48.020 of the Pasco Municipal Code. WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has determined that it is necessary for public safety to permit angle parking on certain streets; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 10.48.020 MARKINGS INDICATING ANGLE PARKING. The City Engineer shall determine upon what streets, other than those forming a part of the primary or secondary State highways, angle parking shall be permitted, ANGLE PARKING PERMITTED NAME OF STREET FROM TO S. 2nd Avenue, west side Lewis Columbia N. 2nd Avenue, west side Clark Bonneville N. 2nd Avenue, west side Yakima Shoshone S. 3rd Avenue, west side Lewis Columbia S. 4th Avenue, west side Columbia South Street S. 4th Lane "A" Street "C" Street N. 4th Avenue Clark Columbia S. 5th Avenue, west side "A" Street "B" Street S.Sth Avenue, east side Lewis G 1 L.' N. 5th Avenue, east side Jan Bypass S. Avenue - «A» St feet "B" c tfeet S. 6th Avenue Columbia, south 170 ft. N, 6th Avenue Shoshone North to alley S. 7th Lane, west.side "A" Street "B" Street S. 7th Avenue Lewis Columbia N�Ah Aven�west side Sheshene South 700 ft. N. 8th Avenue Clark Lewis 9th Avenue, east side "B" Street, north 300 ft (head-in) 9th Avenue Clark Gelumbi Lewis IOth Avenue, west side _. Nixon Sylvester ly (head-in) S. 11 th Avenue, west side " " N. 11th Avenue Bonneville Shoshone N. 12th Avenue, west side Sylvester, south ARey Irving NAME OF STREET FROM TO N. 12th Avenue, west side Sylvester, north Nixon Ainsworth 11th Avenue,east 130 ft. Columbia, south side "Tacoma I st Avenue Columbia,north side 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue Columbia 5th Avenue 7th Avenue Columbia,north side 7th Avenue, west °time 560 ft. Clark, south side 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue Bonneville,north side 1 st Avenue 2nd Avenue 2nd Avenue 5th Avenue (except west of 4th Avenue for 150 ft.) Bonneville, south side, 14th Avenue, east _ 230 ft. Bonneville,north side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue Bonneville,north side 14th Avenue, east 300 ft. Hopkins, south side 14th Avenue, east 180 ft. Hopkins, north side 14th Avenue, east 250 ft.. Hassalo, north side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue Shoshone, south side 14th Avenue east 130 ft. Shoshone, south side 15th Avenue 16th Avenue Shoshone,north side 6th Avenue, west 200 ft. Shoshone, north side _ _ 10th Avenue, west 315 ft. Yakima, south side 10th Avenue, west 12th A• enue 245 ft. yak-ifa, flertl side 12th Avenue 14th A-ven�e Sylvester, north side 444h 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Irving, south side 10th Avenue 15th Avenue Irving, south side 14th Avenue 15th Avenue(head-in) Irving, north side _ 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Nixon, south side 10th Avenue 12th Avenue Nixon, south side 7th Avenue, east One half lee� 5th Avenue Nixon 3rd Avenue:, east 1. Avenue One-half block Margaret, north side 12th Avenue, west 200 ft. Park -4th Avenue Stsy A rr �rrr2nuc Henry, north side 14th Avenue, east One-half block Henry, north side 10th Avenue, west One-half block and east 200 ft. Court,north side 7th Avenue, west 300 ft. (Ord. 2163 Sec. 1, 1980: Ord. 2091 Sec. 1, 1979: Ord, 1793 Sec 3, 1976: prior code Sec. 8- 30.08). Section 2. This Ordinance shall tape effect five (5) days after passage and publication. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as provided by law this day of August, 2008. Joyce Olson Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Debra L. Clark Leland B. Kerr T City Clerk City Attorney CITY OF PASCO SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE NO. is an ordinance amending section 10.48.020 "Markings Indicating Angle Parking" of the Pasco Municipal Code to prohibit parking on various streets. The full text of Ordinance No. is available free of charge and will be mailed (electronically or via postal service) to any person who requests it from the City Clerk of the City of Pasco (509) 545-3402, PO Box 293, Pasco, WA 99301. Debbie Clark, City Clerk AGENDA REPORT TO: City-Council August 17, 2009 FROM: Gary Crutchfi ty Manager Workshop Mtg.: 8/24/09 Regular Mtg.: 9/8/09 SUBJECT: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointments I. REFERENCE(S): L Resolution No. 2314 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 8/24 Discussion 9/8 MOTION: I move to confirm the Mayor's appointment of the following individuals to the 2009 Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: • Hotel Representatives: Monica Hammerberg, Red Lion and Allison White, Sleep Inn; • User Representatives: Nikki Gerds, Pasco Chamber of Commerce and Denis Gisi, Pasco Downtown Development Association; « City Council: Mike Garrison. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The Lodging Tax Advisory Committee (LTAC) was established under Resolution No. 2314 in June 1997 to comply with state requirements imposed at that time relating to the use of the city's lodging tax ("hotel/motel tax"). The committee met in 1997 and 1998 to perform its duty as expressed in Section 4 of Resolution No. 2314. The committee was dormant for several years thereafter, as the committee itself concluded that the existing commitments to debt service (for the TRAC and baseball stadium facilities) and tourism promotion (Visitor & Convention Bureau contract) left no real discretion to the committee. However, in 2004, representatives of the hotel industry in Pasco requested that the committee be revived. V. DISCUSSION: A) The appointments in the past have been structured so as to typically appoint the manager of the Red Lion (representing the largest hotel in Pasco) and the manager of one of the smaller facilities (Sleep Inn). The user representative positions have been the executive directors of the respective organizations noted (Pasco Chamber of Commerce and Pasco Downtown Development Association). B) The Mayor has identified individuals willing to fill the current vacancies. Council is requested to confirm the nominees at the September 8 meeting so that the required meeting of the Advisory Committee can occur timely for budget consideration. 4(i) RESOLUTION NO.� A RESOLUMON establishing a Lodging Tax Advisory Committee. WHEREAS, the City of Pasco currently levies a lodging tax pursuant to Chapter 67.28 RCW; and WHEREAS, the State Legislature has enacted Substitute Senate Bill (SSB) 5867, enacted as Chapter 452, Laws of 1997, which modifies or repeals certain previous lodging tax authority and adds new lodging tax authority; and WHEREAS, SSB 5867 requires any new imposition of a lodging tax enacted dunder Chapter 67.28 RCW in a city with a population 'over 5,000, be first submitted for consideration to a lodging tax advisory committee not less than 45 days in advance of final action on a lodging tax by the city; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 5867 replaces the current lodging tax authority with a new statutory scheme effective July 27, 1997; and WHEREAS, the City of Pasco relies on the receipts of the current lodging tax to fulfill its contractual obligation to Franklin County for its share of the debt and operating expenses associated with the TRAC facility, as well as the bonds issued to finance construction of the professional baseball stadium in Pasco; and WHEREAS, to ensure continued authorization for the imposition of the lodging tax within the City of Pasco, it is deemed to be in the best interest of the city that a lodging tax advisory committee be created immediately and that a proposal be submitted to this committee regarding continuation of a lodging tax; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS- Section 1. There is hereby created a City of Pasco Lodging Tax Advisory Committee to serve the functions prescribed in Senate Bill 5867, which was enacted as Chapter 452, Laws of 1997. Section 2. The membership of the lodging tax advisory committee shall consist of five persons appointed by the City Council. One member shall be an elected official of the city, who shall serve as chair. Two members shall be representatives of businesses required to collect the tax and two members shall be persons involved in activities authorized to be funded from revenue received from the tax. The City Council will review the membership on an annual basis and make changes as appropriate. Any appointments to the committee shall be made by the City Council. Section S. The following persons are hereby appointed to initially serve as members of the lodging tax advisory committee; (A) Elected Official: Councilman Mike Garrison. J ' B) Businesses required to collect the lodging tax shall be represented by: (1) Alan Paty, General Manager, Doubletree Hotel. (2) Dorothy Hildebrant, Manager, Goal Post Motel. (C) Persons involved in activities authorized to use proceeds of the lodging tax shall be represented by: (1) Dorothy Schoeppach, Executive Director, Pasco Chamber,of Commerce. (2) Rosemary Doupd, Executive Director; Pasco Downtown Development Association. Section 4. In accordance with SSB 5867, the City Council shall submit to the lodging tax advisory committee, for its review and comment, proposals on the imposition of any tax authorized under SSB 5867; any increase in the rate of such a tax; repeal of any exemption from such a tax; or a change in the use of the revenue received from such a tax. Comments by the committee should include an analysis of the extent to which the proposal will accommodate activities for tourists or increase tourism and the extent to which the proposal will affect the long-range stability of the special fund created for the lodging tax revenues. Section 5. In accordance with Section 4 of this Resolution, the City Council hereby submits to the lodging tax advisory committee the following proposal for its immediate review and comment: To ensure the continued levy of the lodging tax as authorized by Chapter 67 . 28 RCW, the city should re- enact an Ordinance levying a special excise tax on the sale or charge made for furnishing of lodging that is subject to tax under Chapter 82 . 08 RCW_ Section 6. In order to take all steps necessary or indicated by SSB 5867 with regard to re-enactment of lodging taxes levied by the city, the lodging tax advisory committee is hereby requested to conduct its first meeting not later than June 30, 1997, and to report back to the City Council its comments with respect to the tax proposal set forth in Section 5 of this Resolution no later than July 19, 1997. Section7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular meeting this 16th day of June, 1997. >��/ Charles D. Kilbury, ayor d/ ATTEST: Catherine D. Seaman, Deputy City Clerk APPRO TO FORME Leland R Kerr, City Attorney Resolution establishing a Lodging Tax Advisory Committee - Page 2 AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council August 21, 2009 FROM: Gary Crutchfi anager Workshop Mtg.: 8/24/09 Regular Mtg.: 9/8/09 SUBJECT: Capital Improv ment Plan I. REFERENCE(S): 1 Proposed Capital Improvement Plan 2010-2015 (Council packets only; copy available for review in the City Manager's office, Pasco Library or on the city's website at http://www.pasco-wa.Gov/Generallnfo/FinanceAccounting). 2. Proposed Resolution. IL ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 8/24 (Discussion '9/$ MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. adopting the Capital Improvement Plan for fiscal years 2010-2015. lid'. ;FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS: A) The annual Capital Improvement Plan for 2010-2015 was presented to the City Council for discussion at the August 10 workshop meeting. V. DISCUSSION: A) Several changes have been made to the Plan by staff following the August 10 discussion, as follows: Revised East Road 40 Sewer Line (page 34) and Sewer Line Extension (page 36) to reflect use of Revenue Bonds rather than Sewer Fund cash. • Reduced cost of Commercial Avenue Water Line Extension (page 63) to $250,000 (from $420,000). Reduced Water Line Extension (page 66) to $300,000 (from $600,000). Broadmoor Blvd Water Line Extension (page 70) delayed to 2013. East Side Booster Station (page 71) delayed to 2013. • Added Pasco share of new shelter (page 75) for Tri-Cities Animal Control (estimated value) for 2012. B) Staff recommends Council identify any substantive changes it desires and schedule formal Council approval of the Capital Improvement Plan at the September 8 business meeting, so the Capital Improvement Plan is in place while staff prepares the annual budget this fall. 4(j) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION Approving the Capital Improvement Plan for Calendar Years 2010-2015. WHEREAS, staff has prepared the Capital Improvement Plan which defines the capital projects proposed to be undertaken by the City over the ensuing six years; and WHEREAS, on August 10 and August 24, 2009 the Capital Improvement Plan was presented to the City Council for review and prioritization; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Pasco City Council hereby approves the Capital Improvement Plan for calendar years 2010-2015 as the City's list of capital projects proposed to be undertaken by the City over the coming six years, with the understanding that implementation of any project listed in the Capital Improvement Plan is subject to budget appropriation. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at its regular meeting this 8th day of September, 2009. Joyce Olson Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sandy Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr Deputy City Clerk City Attorney