Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009.01.26 Council Workshop Packet AGENDA PASCO CITY COUNCIL Workshop Meeting 7:00 p.m. January 26,2009 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL: (a) Pledge of Allegiance. 3. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS: 4. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) Left Turn Pocket on Burden Boulevard: 1. Agenda Report from Robert J.Alberts,Public Works Director dated January 21,2009. 2. Map. 3. Accident History. (b) I-182 Corridor Traffic Improvement Plan Options: 1, Agenda Report from Robert J.Alberts,Public Works Director dated January 22,2009. 2. Feasibility Study(Council packets only;copy available in Public Works office,the Pasco Library or on the city's website at www.pasco-wa.gov for public review). (c) Traffic Impact Fees: 1. Agenda Report from Robert J.Alberts,Public Works Director dated January 22,2009. 2. Impact Fees Report (Council packets only; copy available in Public Works office, the Pasco Library or on the city's website at www.pasco-wa. og_v for public review). (d) Downtown Mobility Study: 1. Agenda Report from Robert J.Alberts,Public Works Director dated January 22,2009. 2. Downtown Mobility Study(Council packets only; copy available in Public Works office, the Pasco Library or on the city's website at www.pasco-wa.gov for public review). (e) Sign Code Amendment(Community Event Regional Signs)(MF#CA08-005): 1. Agenda Report from David I.McDonald,City Planner dated January 21,2009, 2. Proposed Ordinance. 3. Memo to Planning Commission dated 12/18/08. 4. Planning Commission Minutes dated 11/20/08 and 12/18/08. (f) Animal Shelter Building Review Committee: 1. Agenda Report from Stan Strebel, Administrative & Community Services Director dated January 20,2009. 2. Letter from Animal Control Authority Representatives. (g) Naming of New City Park: 1, Agenda Report from Stan Strebel, Administrative & Community Services Director dated January 19,2009. 2. Proposed Resolution. 3. Recommendation from Park and Recreation Advisory Council. 4. Map. 5. Resolution No,2499. 5. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: (a) (b) (c) 6. EXECUTIVE SESSION: (a) (b) (c) 7. ADJOURNMENT. REMINDERS: 1. 4:00 p.m., Monday, January 26, Port of Benton - Hanford Area Economic Investment Fund Committee Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER MATT WATKINS,Rep.;AL YENNEY,Alt.) 2. 8:30 a.m., Wednesday, January 28, TRAC - TR1DEC Regional Outlook Forum. (MAYOR JOYCE OLSON) AGENDA REPORT NO.03 FOR: City Counci January 21,2009 TO: Gary Crutch Manager FROM: Robert J.AlJ6k0qJklic Works Director Workshop Mtg.:01/26/09 SUBJECT: Left Turn Pocket on Burden Boulevard I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Map 2. Accident History II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL I STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 01126: Discussion II1. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) On November 24,Bruce Haldors of The Transpo Group made a recommendation to eliminate left turn traffic movement on Burden Boulevard in front of Sun Mart and Dug Out by installing c-curb. V. DISCUSSION: A) The concerns regarding the left turn movements at Burden Boulevard and the entrance to the Sun Mart and Dug Out has been a topic of discussion for several years with the owners. The owners have always objected to any plan to eliminate left turns. Staff has consistently maintained the opinion that safety is important and staff would recommend eliminating left turns if the accident history warrants the change. The Engineering Division and Police Department have been monitoring the traffic movements and concluded that accidents were at an unacceptable level. The Transpo Group was then asked to review the history in conjunction with the on-going traffic reviews. The owners were notified by the City Engineer of the recommendation to be discussed at the January 26, 2009 Council meeting. B) Bruce Haldors will do a brief presentation for the reason of recommendation. The owners of the property have indicated they will attend the Council meeting. Engineering and the Police Department agree with the recommendation by the consultant. As the attachment will show,accident history in the specified location has been increasing over the years. 4(a) k m t 4 MMf. k $ n �r z � of k k i a j y V I I C I I 1 l`6 I i I a+ I co LU f f ate{ CF) T O N !4 a N N N ea III � O E m Z C d O .a a 7 ? m O 'n N 2 I I C o CD .a N I o N I I O O N O C f6 6i OD h (O N7 M N O W Op I� CD M N r O N suoisipoo;o jagwnN a U Q AGENDA REPORT NO.04 FOR: City Council January 22,2009 TO: Gary Crutchfie Manager FROM: Robert J.Albe 'Ievii-AVorks Director Workshop Mtg.: 01/26/09 SUBJECT: Discussion with The Transpo Group regarding I-182 Corridor Traffic Improvement Plan Options I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Feasibility Study(Council packets only;copy available in Public Works office,the Pasco Library or on the city's website at www.pasco-wa.gov for public review) Il. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 01/26: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) In June 2008,Council authorized The Transpo Group to determine the feasibility of transportation options along the I-182 Corridor between Broadmoor Blvd and 201h Ave. At the November 24, 2008 Council meeting, Mr. Bruce Haldors of The Transpo Group discussed the preliminary findings of the I-182 Corridor Traffic Improvement Study. V. DISCUSSION: A) The Transpo Group has been reviewing transportation options and has met with WSDOT representatives. B) Since the November 24, 2008 Council meeting, The Transpo Group has been finalizing their review and has prepared a final document. Mr. Bruce Haldors will discuss the plan with Council. Staff recommends finalizing and approving the plan. 4(b) AGENDA REPORT NO.06 FOR: City Council January 22,2009 TO: Gary Crutch a Manager FROM: Robert J.Albe 4 orks Director Workshop Mtg.: 01/26/09 SUBJECT: Discussion of Traffic Impact Fees I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Impact Fees Report(Council packets only;copy available in Public Works office, the Pasco Library or on the city's website at www.pasco-wa.gov for public review) II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 01/26: Discussion: III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The City collects traffic impact fees for projects along the I-182 Corridor and west of SR 395. The traffic impact fees were last updated in March 2005. As part of the I-182 Corridor review, impact fees were reviewed at the November 24, 2008 Council meeting. Mr. Bruce Haldors of The Transpo Group discussed their initial findings and options. V. DISCUSSION: A) The Transpo Group has finalized their review of projects and Traffic Impact Fees. The recommendation is to increase the impact fees. Current Proposed Residential Development $300 per unit $709 per dwelling unit Multi-Family Units $200 per unit $435 per dwelling unit Commercial $20 per daily trip $43 per daily trip Staff concurs with the findings and recommends Council approve the new Traffic Impact Fees. 4(c) AGENDA REPORT NO.05 FOR: City Council January 22,2009 TO: Gary Crutchfie i Manager FROM: Robert J.Alb Works Director Workshop Mtg.: 01/26/09 SUBJECT: Discussion with The Transpo Group regarding the Downtown Mobility Study I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Downtown Mobility Study(Council packets only;copy available in Public Works office,the Pasco Library or on the city's website at www.pasco-wa.gov for public review) II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 01/26: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) In June 2008,Council approved to have The Transpo Group study the existing and future traffic and pedestrian needs along the 4`h Avenue Corridor(approximately 3'd Avenue to 5t'Avenue)from Court Street to Clark Street. Mr. Bruce Haldors of The Transpo Group presented to Council the initial findings of the study. V. DISCUSSION: A) The Transpo Group has been working to complete the study. The study is complete and Mr. Bruce Haldors will discuss the recommendations with Council. Staff recommends Council accept the final study. 4(d) AGENDA REPORT NO. FOR: City Council 1 January 21, 2009 TO: Gary Crutchfie ManagerV,/ WORKSHOP: 1/26/09 Rick White,Di c ,Community&Economic D v. ` REGULAR:2/02/09 FROM: David I.McDonald,City Planner�� SUBJECT: Sign Code Amendment(Community Event Regional Signs)(MF#CA08-005) I. REFERENCEN: A. Proposed Ordinance B. Memo to Planning Commission: 12/18/08 C. Planning Commission Minutes Dated: 11/20/08& 12/18/08 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/26/09 Discussion: 2/2/09 MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. an Ordinance amending PMC Chapter 17.13 dealing with off premise signs and,further,authorize publication by summary only. III. FISCAL IMPACT: None IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A. Over the past year staff has received a number of inquiries about the need for specific signage to promote events at major community facilities used for regional events. People attending regional events often come from outside the community. Unfamiliarity with the community can leaded to difficulties in finding regional event facilities. In response to this issue staff, with the assistance of the Planning Commission, prepared a draft code amendment that provides language for the location of regional community event signage. B. The Planning Commission held a workshop in November and a public hearing in December of 2008 to consider the proposed code amendment for off-premise signs. The attached December staff memo essentially reflects the information that was provided to the Planning Commission at the November Commission workshop. Therefore,the November memo to the Planning Commission has not been included with this report. V. DISCUSSION: The proposed code amendment would permit off-premise signs to identify events occurring at regional sports/entertainment/convention/trade facilities. The scope of the proposed code amendment is very narrow in that it would only permit regional community event signs for facilities with 60 or more acres that are located within 1,000 feet of a freeway interchange and adjacent to a highway of statewide significance. If the Council concurs with the recommended code amendment, the proposed ordinance will be placed on the February 2,2009 agenda for Council action. 4(e) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PMC Chapter 17.13 DEALING WITH OFF-PREMISE SIGNS. WHEREAS, cities have the responsibility to regulate and control physical development within their borders and promote the public health,safety and welfare of the community;and, WHEREAS, the Pasco Municipal Code defines a variety of signs including freeway signs that provide regional identification for a group of businesses within a defined business association where said businesses occupy a minimum of 15 acres of land;and, WHEREAS, the Pasco Municipal Code permits business complex signs that identify a business complex with multiple businesses that may or may not be located where the business complex sign is located;and, WHEREAS, the Pasco Municipal Code permits special event signs for community events to be displayed on or off the premises where the event is taking place; and, WHEREAS, Community Event Facilities used for sports events, entertainment, conventions, trade shows and events of region wide interest are functionally similar to regional business complexes and or community event activities that are permitted to have off-premise signage and or large business complex signs;and, WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that to further the purposes of the sign code and the proper identification of community wide events and activities at regional community event centers it is necessary to amend PMC Chapter 17.13; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Chapter 17.03 of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subsection 17.03.01 (A)(49.01)to reads as follows: 49.01) SIGN—COMMUNITY EVENT REGIONAL means a sign that identifies events occurring at a regional sports/entertainment/convention/trade facility containing 60 or more acres located within 1,000 feet of a freeway interchange and adjacent a highway of statewide significance. Section 2. That Chapter 17.13 of the Pasco Municipal Code shall be and hereby is amended to include a new subsection to reads as follows: 17.13.080 Community Event Regional Signs. Community events regional signs are permitted on public or private property within 1,200 feet of the facility property. Community event regional signs shall not be more than 200 square feet per face; shall not be greater than 50 feet in height and shall be a single pole mount system. Said pole shall be painted gray, tan, light brown or other neutral color as approved by the Community and Economic Development Director. Signs not conforming to the provisions herein may be reviewed and approved on a case- by-case basis through the special permit process. Provided,however,no sign greater than 50 feet in height or more than 200 square feet in size shall be permitted. Community event regional signs shall only be used for advertizing events and activities at the facility and/or non-commercial events of community wide interest. Section 3. This ordinance shall become effective five (5) days after publication as required by law. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington and approved as provided by law this day of ,2009. Joyce Olson Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sandy Kenworthy Leland B.Kerr Deputy City Clerk City Attorney MEMORANDUM DATE: December 18,2008 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Dave McDonald,City Planner SUBJECT; Sign Code Amendment Approximately 2 years ago the City Council adopted a sign code to provide direction for the placement of signs within the City. The purpose of the sign code was to increase the effectiveness of visual communication within the City while promoting the general welfare of the community. The Sign Code established design,construction and maintenance standards for all signs erected in the City. The Code also lists and defines various types of signs. Included in the sign definitions are freeway interchange signs, directory of tenant signs and community event signs. These signs all provide identification or advertising for businesses or events that may or may not be on the property where the sign is located. Freeway interchange signs for example,provide regional identification for a group of businesses that collectively occupy a minimum of 15 acres of land. Community event signs are temporary signs that are permitted on or off the property where the community event is taking place. In reviewing the various types of signs in the sign code,staff has recently been made aware of the fact that there is a need for a sign that provides identification of large community sports, entertainment or trade show events. Attached is a proposed code amendment that provides a definition and some location standards for Regional Community Events signs. The proposed code amendment limits the use of Regional Community Event signs to facilities that are located on 60 or more acres within 1,000 feet of a freeway interchange. The proposal limits signs to 50 feet in height with no more than 200 square feet of display area per face. The Planning Commission discussed the proposed code amendment in a workshop last month. A hearing has been scheduled for the December 18th meeting. Recommendation MOTION: I move the Planning Commission recommend the City amend Title 17 to include provisions for Regional Community Event signs as indicated in the proposed ordinance. 1 Planning Commission Minutes 11/20/08 B. Code Amendment Sin Code Amendment (Community Event Regional Signs) (City of Pasco) IMF# CA 08- 008 Chairman Samuel read the master file number, opened the hearing and asked for comments from staff. Staff explained this item was not site specific and would apply to any site in the City that would qualify under the proposal. It was further explained that there was a need in the community for signs that provided identification of large community sports, entertainment or trade show events. As a result a proposed code amendment had been drafted. Staff reviewed the proposed definition of a Regional Community Event sign. The proposal would permit off-premise signs to identify events occurring at a regional sports/entertainment/convention/trade facility containing 60 or more acres located within 1,000 feet of a freeway interchange adjacent a highway of statewide significance. The proposal would create code language similar in nature to the freeway interchange sign regulations that permited the Pasco Auto-Plea sign. Commissioner Rose asked what constituted an event. Staff clarified the proposal was not for an event, it is for facilities. It would allow regional sports/entertainment/convention/trade facilities to advertise events. Commissioner Rose was concerned about the allowable size for this type of sign. Staff stated the sign would not be larger than the Pasco Auto-Plea sign. Chairman Samuel asked if our sister cities had this type of sign code. Staff stated the City of Kennewick addresses these types of signs with a conditional use permit. Commissioner Cruz asked about the requirement for a single pole. Staff stated the use of a single pole was a height limiting issue. Chairman Samuel asked if there were any restrictions for a lighted sign. Staff stated no. Planning Commission members briefly discussed the option of reviewing Regional Community Event signs through the special permit process. Commissioner Anderson and Commissioner Hay stated they were in favor of providing specific code requirements versus review through the special permit process. Commissioner little asked if the Food Pavilion site would be eligible for this type of sign. Staff stated no, the Food Pavilion site was not large enough to meet the requirements. Planning Commission Minutes 12/18/08 D. Code Amendment Sin Code Amendment JCommunity Event Regional Signs) (City of Pasco) (MF# CA 08-005) Chairman Samuel read the master file number, opened the hearing and asked for comments from staff. Staff explained this item had been discussed at the last regular meeting during a workshop. The proposal was to amend the existing sign code dealing with off- premise signs. The proposal would permit community regional event signs for large facilities which would house entertainment, recreation, and community-wide events on sites of 60 acres or more provided the site was adjacent to highways of statewide significance. Additionally the site would need to be near a major interchange. Additional discussion centered on the design standards for regional event signs. Commissioner Samuel asked what organizations would be eligible for use of the proposed sign code. Staff stated currently there was only one in Pasco and that was the Trade and Recreation Center. The TRAC site was large enough to meet the parameters listed in the proposed code. Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing for public comments. Following three calls for public comment the hearing was closed. Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Hay, the Planning Commission recommends the City amend Title 17 to include provisions for regional event signs as indicated in the proposed ordinance. The motion passed unanimously. AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 20,2009 TO: Gary Crutchfi Manager FROM: Stan Strebel, rmmsk4Uvq.and Community Workshop Mtg.: 1/26/09 Services Director Regular Mtg.:2/2/09 SUBJECT: Animal Shelter Building Review Committee I. REFERENCE(S): 1. Letter from Animal Control Authority Representatives II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1126: Discussion III. FISCAL IMPACT: IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) The existing Animal Control Shelter was originally constructed for the Benton- Franklin Humane Society in 1975 (a smaller adjacent building was built many years prior). The City of Pasco purchased the facility in 2001 and currently leases the facility to the Animal Control Authority (consisting of the cities of Pasco, Richland and Kennewick). B) The ACA operates the shelter through Tri-City Animal Shelter and Control Services, a private contractor. In 2008, some 4,500 animals were processed through the shelter. C) With growth in the Tri-Cities area over the last several years,future capacity at the shelter is beginning to be an issue to be addressed. The age and physical condition of the facility are also of growing concern to ACA representatives and the contractor. D) In 2008 the ACA contracted with Shelter Planners of America for the preparation of a Building Needs and Feasibility Assessment study, with the intent of identifying shelter facility needs for the 20 year planning horizon. The study suggests that future needs may translate into a facility of approximately twice the size of the current shelter(15,000 sq.ft.) E) Historically,animal shelters have typically been constructed and located following an industrial/warehouse approach resulting in facilities which were less costly to construct, however, somewhat less accessible to the public. More contemporary design trends suggest that shelters designed to be more inviting to the public are more successful in reducing unnecessary destruction of animals through increased adoption rates. Design can also be a significant factor in reducing operational costs. F) Because the projected cost for a new facility, $4 million, is significant, but dependant on the approach that the cities choose to take, the ACA has recommended that a City Council review committee, composed of 2 Council members from each of the three cities, be appointed to work with ACA staff representatives in considering needs and options for the ACA facility. The committee will likely meet over the next 4 — 5 months in formulating recommendations for the ACA and the 3 cities to consider in future plans. 4(f) January 12,2009 Cindy Johnson,City Manager,City of Richland Robert Hammond,City Manager,City of Kennewick Gary Crutchfield,City manager,City of Pasco As you know,the Tri-City Animal Control Authority recently commissioned Shelter Planners of America to complete a needs assessment study for the animal shelter. The study was undertaken to help the ACA and the three cities outline the process of responding to the challenges that we are beginning to confront with the current facility—age and capacity. The study identifies considerations that should be made in anticipation of the projected 2025 population for the area and the expected shelter capacity demands and associated functions. The preliminary estimates suggest that a facility of some 15,300 sq,ft.may be needed,costing an approximate$4 million. The consultant's work includes preparation of a preliminary building plan and layout for more detailed cost estimating and planning purposes. However,before moving forward to complete that work,we recommend that the City Councils be brought into the process so that the ACA and the three cities can proceed according to the Councils'direction. You will recall that last summer,as we discussed alternative approaches for the siting and construction of a new facility, there were at least two different models to consider: 1)a more traditional"warehouse"approach where the facility may be located in a more remote or industrial area with potentially lower construction costs but possibly less appeal to the public and 2)a more contemporary model focused on greater public appeal,animal comfort and long term durability. Of course,this "higher profile"option would be expected to cost more but holds the potential to reduce operational costs and increase the level of adoptions. It was determined that it would be important for Council members to become familiar with these alternatives and give direction in this regard. As discussed,when the consultant was selected,we recommend that each Council designate two members from each body to meet with the ACA to review the needs assessment and the status of the current facility. We would then propose that the group hold one meeting with the consultant before authorizing completion of the preliminary building plan phase. This phase(remaining cost expected to be approximately$7,200—divided between the three cities)will result in a plan that can be used for prioritizing,siting and preparing a financing and budgeting plan for a new facility if the three City Councils authorize this step. If the decision is to move forward,it is logical that this committee would provide some direction regarding other decisions that will be needed along the way. If members from the respective Councils are named during January,we expect that the remaining work(building plan and layout),as described herein,can be completed before summer. Sincerely, Ron Musson Scott Ruf Stan Strebel City of Richland City of Kennewick City of Pasco AGENDA REPORT FOR: City Council January 19,2009 TO: Gary Crutchfi anager Workshop Mtg.: 1/26/09 Regular Mtg.:2/2/09 FROM: Stan Strebel,Ad 'ruve and Community Services Director SUBJECT: Naming of ew City Park I. REFERENCE(S): A. Proposed Resolution B. Recommendation from Park and Recreation Advisory Council C. Map D. Resolution No.2499 II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: 1/26: Discussion 2/2: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. adopting the name of "Desert Dunes Park"for the new park located on Cathedral Drive as recommended by the Park and Recreation Advisory Council. III. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF: A) A new neighborhood park in First Place Subdivision, west of Road 44, was completed and dedicated to the City last year. B) Following the guidelines of the City's facility naming policy (Resolution No. 2499, attached) the Advisory Council considered local neighborhoods, historical and geographic elements prior to developing its recommendation, as described in the attached letter from the Chairman of the Council. C) At the January meeting of the Advisory Council a motion was passed to recommend"Desert Dunes Park"for the new park on Cathedral Drive in the First Place subdivision. D) It is recommended that the Council approve the name recommendation so that appropriate signage can be prepared prior to the park being opened this summer. 4(g) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION adopting the name of "Desert Dunes Park" for the new park located on Cathedral Drive. WHEREAS,the City Parks and Recreation Advisory Council has recommended a name for the new City park on Cathedral Drive;and WHEREAS, considering the best interests of the community, the Advisory Council has recommended the name of"Desert Dunes Park"for the park;NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: SECTION 1: That the new park located on Cathedral Drive shall be named "Desert Dunes Park". PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of 2009. Joyce Olson,Mayor ATTEST: Sandy Kenworthy,Deputy City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Lee Ken,City Attorney 1 ADMINISTRATIVE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT P.O.BOX 293,525 NORTH THIRD AVENUE,PASCO,WASHINGTON 99301 DIVfS/ONS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (509)544-3096 FAX 543-5727 CITYCLERK (509)545-3402 FAX 543-5727 January 19,2009 FACILITIES SERVICES (509)543-5757 FAX 543-5758 FINANCE Pasco City Council SERVICES (509)545-3401 FAX 544.3082 Honorable Council Members: INFOPUUTION SERVICES On behalf of the Park and Recreation Advisory Council and pursuant to City Resolution No. (509)545-3419 2499,I am pleased to recommend the name of Desert Dunes Park for the new park in the FAX543.5758 First Place Subdivision. The Council has spent a good deal of time discussing and SSEERVI ESoN deliberating on an appropriate name for this facility. (509)545-3456 FAX 545-3455 The Council feels that the name"Desert Dunes"recognizes the desert theme that is so common for street names in this and adjacent neighborhoods. Additionally,the name echoes some of the local history of the area. (Edmond Daniels,long time Pasco resident and member of the Advisory Council,remembers playing in the sand dunes in this general area as a young man.) We thank you for your consideration of this recommendation and look forward to your final decision to name this facility. Thank you very much for the opportunity to be of assistance. Sincerely, Duane Taber,Chairman Park and Recreation Advisory Council -- )sl - - 7 7 Si / I i l i iii}�'i �[��i I \ � '\ ;•\. �.\; _ � - i iii , ! I • �ifs'' ;' �� � � � � _ � � • �7' RESOLUTION NO. 2499 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A POLICY FOR NAMING OF CITY PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it to be beneficial to approve a policy and procedure for the naming of City Parks and Recreation Facilities as occasion may require, and WHEREAS, the City Parks and Recreation Advisory Council has developed and recommended the establishment of such a policy, Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO: That the attached policy for naming of City Parks and Recreation Facilities is hereby approved. PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 7th day of February, 2040. ichael L yor�z ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (��L- .& u Catherine D. Seaman, Leland Kerr, City Atto y Deputy City Clerk Policy for Naming of City Parks and Recreation Facilities Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to provide a process whereby City parks and recreational facilities may be named. Polic : When authorized by the City Council, the City Parks and Recreation Advisory Council shall be charged with the responsibility of making recommendations for the naming of City parks and recreational facilities. The City Council shall consider the recommendations of the Advisory Council and make final determinations. Procedure: 1. When, in the opinion of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Council, it is necessary to name or rename a City park or recreation facility, it shall advise the City Council of its opinion and may suggest a process whereby a name shall be chosen. 2. The City Council shall review the matter and, if it concurs with the Advisory Council, shall authorize the Council to proceed. Otherwise the Council shall give such direction to the Advisory Council as it deems appropriate. 3. The Advisory Council may conduct public hearings or use contests, solicitations, historic evidence or any other appropriate means under the circumstances, and within the direction of the City Council, to generate ideas and recommendations for a name. Names for parks and facilities should be appropriate for the facility and the community served. If for a neighborhood facility, the name should support or help establish a neighborhood identity. If for a facility serving the entire community, the name should be appropriate considering the diversity of users_ Names should be such that their meaning and significance to the neighborhood or the community will remain over time. 4. The Advisory Council shall submit its recommendations to the City Council for final consideration.