HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008.08.04 Council Meeting Packet AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. August 4, 2008
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance.
3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion(in the form listed below). There will be
no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Councilmembers or the public,
the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately.
(a) Approval of Minutes:
1. Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated July 21, 2008.
(b) Bills and Communications: (A detailed listing of claims is available for review in the Finance
Manager's office.)
1. To approve General Claims in the amount of $1,263,067.47 ($112,144.67 in the form of
Wire Transfer Nos. 5012 and 5018 and, $1,150,922.80 consisting of Claim Warrants
numbered 167088 through 167313).
2. To approve Payroll Claims in the amount of $2,169,099.28, Voucher Nos. 38164 through
38399; and EFT Deposit Nos. 30024070 through 30024579.
*(c) Appointment to Regional Hotel/Motel Commission:
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated July 31, 2008.
2. Letter from Tri-Cities Hotel and Lodging Association dated 6/24/08.
3. Section 5 of Interlocal Agreement establishing Tri-City Regional Tourism Promotion Area.
To reappoint Hermann Haastrup (Pasco Red Lion) to a two-year term on the Tri-Cities Regional
Hotel/Motel Commission; term to expire 8/30/10.
(d) Resolution No. 3091, a Resolution authorizing the sale of forfeiture/unclaimed asset property
surplus to city needs.
1. Agenda Report from Debbie Clark, City Clerk dated July 18, 2008.
2. Memorandum from David Renzelman, Crime Specialist/Evidence Technician.
3. Proposed Resolution.
To approve Resolution No. 3091, authorizing the sale of seized/asset forfeiture property
considered surplus to city needs.
*(e) Resolution No. 3092, a Resolution fixing the time and date for a public hearing to consider the
vacation of a portion of Montana Avenue, Colorado Avenue and a portion of Pueblo Street,
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated July 30, 2008.
2. Proposed Resolution and Vicinity Map.
3. Vacation Petition.
To approve Resolution No. 3092, fixing 7:00 p.m., September 2, 2008 as the time and date for a
public hearing to consider the proposed vacation.
Q*(f) Resolution No.3093, a Resolution approving a Preliminary Plat for Sun View Estates.
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated July 30, 2008.
2. Proposed Resolution,
3. Preliminary Plat(Council packets only).
4. Report to Planning Commission.
5. Planning Commission Minutes dated 6/19108 and 7/17/08.
Note: Preliminary Plat is available in the Planning Office, the Pasco Library or on the city's
webpage at www.pasco-wa.gov for public review.
To approve Resolution No. 3093, approving the preliminary plat for Sun View Estates.
*(g) To cancel the Workshop meeting of August 11,2008.
(Rc) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
Regular Meeting 2 August 4,2008
4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
(a) "Yard of the Month" Awards. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA) The following
Pasco residents have been invited to attend the Council meeting to receive Certificates of
Appreciation from Mayor Joyce Olson for"Yard of the Month,"July 2008.
1. Raphael and Felicitas Gamino, 803 N. Elm Avenue
2. Robert Hamm and Terre Estes, 512 N. Road 39
3. Don and Rosie Bogart, 3611 Verbena Court
4. Charles Thompson and Phyllis Krystal, 4104 Galway Lane
(b) "Business of the Month" Appearance Award. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA)
The following Pasco business has been invited to attend the Council meeting to receive a
Certificate of Appreciation from Mayor Joyce Olson for "Business of the Month Appearance
Award"for July 2008.
1. Harvey-Monteith Insurance, 3825 W. Court Street
5. VISITORS -OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS:
(a)
(b)
(c)
6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
(b)
(c)
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO:
(a) Local Improvement District (LID) No. 145 — "A" Street Improvements between Elm
Avenue and Road 40 East:
1. Agenda Report from Doyle L. Heath,Utility Engineer dated July 31, 2008.
2. Street Cross Sections Drawing.
3. Assessment Map.
4. Ordinance.
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING
Ordinance No. , an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, relating to City
Street Improvements; ordering the improvement of"A" Street between Elm Avenue and Road 40
East, to city standards, including curb, gutter, utilities and bicycle path, all in accordance with
Resolution No. 3089 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 145, and
ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvements; providing that payment for the
improvements be made by special assessments upon the property in the District, payable by the
mode of "payment by bonds"; and providing for the issuance and sale of local improvement
district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing and local improvement district
bonds.
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , creating Local Improvement District 145
for "A" Street between Elm Avenue and Road 40 East and, further, authorize publication by
summary only.
(b) Comprehensive Plan Update (MF#CP07-002) (City of Pasco):
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated July 31, 2008.
2. Ordinance No. 3866.
3. Comprehensive Plan(Council packets only),
4. Beacon Development Land Use request letter.
Note: Comprehensive Plan copies available in the Planning Office, the Pasco Library or on
the city's webpage at www.pasco-wa.gov for public review.
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING
Ordinance No. 3866, an Ordinance relating to comprehensive land use planning and adopting a
new GMA Comprehensive Plan for the City of Pasco.
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 3866, establishing a new Comprehensive Plan for the
City of Pasco and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
Regular Meeting 3 August 4, 2008
8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS:
(a) Code Enforcement Civil Violation Penalties:
1. Agenda Report from Stan Strebel, Administrative& Community Services Director dated July
29, 2008.
2. Proposed Ordinance Amending FMC Chapter 11.02 "Civil Infractions."
3. Proposed Ordinance Amending PMC Chapter 3.07 "Fee Summary."
Ordinance No. , an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, amending Pasco
Municipal Code Title 11 "Civil Infractions" Section 11.02.050 "Notice of Civil Violation -
Monetary Penalty" and Section 11.02.060"Hearing Before the Code Enforcement Board."
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , amending PMC Section 11.02.050, "Notice
of Civil Violation" and 11.02.060 "Hearing Before the Code Enforcement Board" and, further,
authorize publication by summary only.
-AND-
Ordinance No. , an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, amending Pasco
Municipal Code Chapter 3.07 "Fee Summary" Section 3.07.070"Code Enforcement Program."
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , amending PMC Section 3.07.070, "Code
Enforcement Program" and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
(b) Ordinance No. , an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, amending Section
9.61.060"Violations"increasing the penalty for subsequent noise violations.
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated July 31, 2008.
2. Proposed Ordinance.
3. PMC Section 9.61.020 "Public Disturbance Noise Prohibited."
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , amending Section 9.61.060 "Violations,"
increasing the penalty for subsequent noise violations and, further, authorize publication by
summary only.
(c) Resolution No. a Resolution amending the Program Year 2008 Community
Development Block Grant Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
1. Agenda Report from Angie Pitman,Block Grant Administrator dated July 29, 2008.
2. 2008 CDBG Fund Summary and Proposal Summary.
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 7/17/08.
4. Resolution Amending 2008 Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. amending the city's 2008 CDBG
Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
(d) Resolution No. , a Resolution approving the Program Year 2009 Community
Development Block Grant Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
1. Agenda Report from Angie Pitman,Block Grant Administrator dated July 29, 2008.
2. 2009 CDBG Fund Summary and Proposal Summary.
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 6/19/08 and 7/17/08.
4. Resolution Approving 2009 Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. approving the city's 2009 CDBG
Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
(None)
10. NEW BUSINESS:
i
*(a) Reconstruction of Alley Approaches-2008 Phase 2, Project No.07-3-04:
1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated July 30, 2008.
2. Bid Summary.
3. Vicinity Map.
txQ MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the Reconstruction of Alley Approaches - 2008
Phase 2, Project No. 07-3-04 to Scott's Excavating Tri-Cities, LLC, in the amount of$49,738.00
and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the contract documents.
*(b) Right-of-Way Dedication for Power Line Road(MF#INF008-083):
1. Agenda Report from David 1. McDonald,City Planner dated July 30, 2008,
2. Vicinity Map.
3. Right-of-Way Dedication Deed.
MOTION: I move to accept the deed from Kenneth Smith for a portion of the Power Line Road
Right-of-Way.
Regular Meeting 4 August 4,2008
(c) Car Allowance Adjustment:
1, Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated August 1, 2008.
2. Unleaded Fuel Prices-Washington, 1105-7/08.
3. IRS Mileage Reimbursement Rate, 2/05-7/08.
4. Car Allowance Positions/Amounts.
MOTION: I move to increase authorized car allowances by 40%,retroactive to January 1, 2008.
Q*(d) Special Permit: Location of a School at 3309 Road 100 (Kingspoint Christian School) (MF
#SP08-005):
1. Agenda Report from David I.McDonald, City Planner dated July 30, 2008,
2. Report to Planning Commission.
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 6/19/08 and 7/17/08.
MOTION: I move to approve the Special Permit for the Kingspoint Christian School to be
located in the 3300 block of Road 100 as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Q*(e) Special Permit: Franklin County Courthouse Parking Lot at 1016 N. 4t° Avenue (Franklin
County) (MF#SP08-006):
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald,City Planner dated July 30, 2008.
2. Report to Planning Commission.
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 6/19/08 and 7/17/08.
MOTION: I move to approve the Special Permit for the Franklin County Courthouse parking lot
at 1016 N. 4'"Avenue as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Q*(f) Special Permit: Location of a Church at 216 N. 1P Avenue (Iglesia Bautista El Calvario)
(MF#SP08-004):
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated July 30, 2008.
2. Report to Planning Commission.
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 6119/08 and 7/17/08.
MOTION: I move to approve the Special Permit for the Iglesia Bautista El Calvario at 216 N.
i I"'Avenue as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Q*(g) Special Permit: Location of a Church at 3212 Wernett Road (Iglesia Apostolica de la fe en
Cristo 'Jesus)(MF#SP08-003):
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald,City Planner dated July 30, 2008.
2. Report to Planning Commission.
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 6/19/08 and 7/17/08.
MOTION: I move to approve the Special Permit for the Iglesia Apostolica de la fe en Cristo
Jesus at 3212 Wernett Road as recommended by the Planning Commission.
11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
13. ADJOURNMENT.
(RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
MF# "Master File#......
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
REMINDERS:
1. 1:30 p.m., Monday, August 4, KGH - Emergency Medical Services Board Meeting.
(COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN, Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.)
2. 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, August 6, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue - Franklin County Mosquito Control
District Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; AL YENNEY,Alt.)
3. 5:30 p.m., Thursday, August 7, Parks & Rec. Classroom - Parks & Recreation Advisory Council
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER REBECCA FRANCIK, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.)
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL JULY 21, 2008
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Joyce Olson, Mayor.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers present: Rebecca Francik, Michael Garrison, Robert Hoffmann, Tom
Larsen, Joyce Olson, Matt Watkins and Al Yenney.
Staff present: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager; Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney; Stan Strebel,
Administrative & Community Services Director; Rick White, Community & Economic
Development Director; Bob Alberts, Public Works Director; David McDonald, City Planner;
Denis Austin, Police Chief and Debbie Clark, City Clerk.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA:
(a) Approval of Minutes:
Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated July 7, 2008.
(b) Bills and Communications:
To approve General Claims in the amount of$2,071,454.34 ($117,276.29 in the form of
Wire Transfer Nos. 5002, 5005 and 5008 and, $1,954,178.05 consisting of Claim Warrants
numbered 166848 through 167087).
To approve bad debt write-offs for utility billing,ambulance, cemetery, general accounts,
miscellaneous accounts, and Municipal Court (non-criminal, criminal, and parking) accounts
receivable in the total amount of$165,924.83 and, of that amount, authorize $142,411.65 be
turned over for collection.
(c) Water Follies Insurance Requirements:
To approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for Operation of the Water Follies Event
and, further, to authorize the City Manager to sign the Amendment.
(d) Right-of-Way Dedication for Sandifur ParkwayBroadmoor Boulevard Signal
(MF#INF008-042):
To accept the deed from Dale Adams for a portion of the Sandifur Parkway/Broadmoor
Boulevard Right-of-Way.
(e) Civil Service Commission Appointments:
To confirm the City Manager's appointment of Coz Edwards to the Civil Service
Commission, to fill the unexpired term of Position No. 2 to expire 2/17/10.
To confirm the City Manager's appointment of Teri Cox to the Civil Service Commission to
fill the unexpired term of Position No. 3 to expire 2/17/12.
To confirm the City Manager's appointment of Janis Hastings to the Civil Service
Commission to fill Position No. 1, the term to expire 2/17/14.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the Consent Agenda as read. Mr. Garrison
seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote.
I 3(a).1
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL JULY 21, 2008
PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
Mr. Crutchfield introduced Mr. Rick White, new Community& Economic Development
Director.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
Mr. Garrison reported on the Hanford Communities Governing Board meeting.
Mr. Yenney attended the Corridor Enhancement Study Committee meeting.
Mr. Larsen attended the Benton Franklin Council of Governments meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO:
Street Vacation—A Portion of Washington Street and South 13th Lane (MF#VAC-08-
005):
Mr. McDonald explained the details of the proposed vacation.
MAYOR OLSON DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO CONSIDER THE VACATION.
FOLLOWING THREE CALLS FOR COMMENTS,EITHER FOR OR AGAINST, AND THERE BEING
NONE,MAYOR OLSON DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.
Ordinance No. 3869, an Ordinance vacating a portion of Washington Street and South
13th Lane.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to adopt Ordinance No. 3869, vacating a portion of
Washington Street and South 13th Lane and, further, authorize publication by summary
only. Ms. Francik seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Animal Control/Fees:
Ordinance No. 3870, an Ordinance amending Chapter 8.02 "Animal Control" of the
Pasco Municipal Code.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to adopt Ordinance No. 3870, amending PMC Chapter 8.02
Animal Control and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Ms. Francik seconded.
Motion carried unanimously.
Ordinance No. 3871, an Ordinance amending Section 3.07.020 "Animal Control' of the
Pasco Municipal Code.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to adopt Ordinance No. 3871, amending PMC Section
3.07.020 Fee Summary—Animal Control and, further, authorize publication by summary
only. Ms. Francik seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
Potential Traffic Signal System at Broadmoor Blvd/Saint Thomas Drive:
Mr. Bruce Haldors, representing The Transpo Group, presented the findings of a study on
the potential signal.
Mr. Fran Forgette, representing developer Robert Young, explained the need for unrestricted
access to and from Broadmoor Blvd.
2
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL JULY 21, 2008
Council and staff discussed the proposed traffic signal.
No action was taken. Council directed staff to meet with affected property owners to identify
an acceptable solution.
Solid Waste Contract—Fuel Surcharge:
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the Solid Waste Contract Amendment for fuel
surcharge and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Mr. Garrison seconded.
Motion carried 5-1. No—Larsen.
Lewis Street Overpass—CH2MHiil:
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the agreement with CH2MHil1 design services
for the Lewis Street Overpass on a time and material basis not to exceed$225,000 and,
further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried
5-1. No—Larsen.
WSDOT Agreement for I-182IRoad 68 Improvements:
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the agreement with Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for design and construction of right turn pocket and
slip lane at I-I 82/Road 68 in the amount of$212,484.30 and, further, authorize the Mayor to
sign the agreement. Ms. Francik seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote.
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
Council adjourned to Executive Session at 8:21 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes to
discuss enforcement action and litigation or potential litigation with the City Attorney and
the City Manager.
Mayor Olson called the meeting back to order at 8:40 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:41 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Joyce Olson, Mayor Sandy Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk
PASSED and APPROVED this 4t'day of August, 2008.
3
CITY OF PASCO
Council Meeting of:
August 4, 2008
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We, the unde ig d, do her .b under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished,the
services re ere or the I r perform d as described herein and that the claim is a just, due and unpaid
obligation a i t the 'y and that are authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim.
Gary C r7 fi rd, City ana r James W. Chase, Finance Manager
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County,Washington,
do hereby certify that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received;that Wire Transfer
No.s 5012 and 5018 in the amount of$112,144.67, have been authorized;that Check No.s 167088 through
167313 are approved for payment in the amount of$1,150,922.80,for a combined total of$1,263,067.47 on this
4th day of August,2008-
Councilmember Councilmember
SUMMARY OF CLAIMSIWIRE TRANSFERS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND:
Legislative 1,264.29
Judicial 9,545.80
Executive 3,446.13
Police 189,175.46
Fire 20,475.32
Administration & Community Services 131,281.64
Community Development 40,567.29
Engineering 1,739.01
Non-Departmental 10,977.12
Library 92,459.95
TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 500,932.01
STREET 79,721.85
C. D. BLOCK GRANT 658.43
KING COMMUNITY CENTER 1,124.53
AMBULANCE SERVICE 2,697,22
CEMETERY 2,181.60
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 1,235.35
SENIOR CENTER 3,183.29
MULTI MODAL FACILITY 1,342.45
RIVERSHORE TRAIL&MARINA MAIN 898.65
LITTER CONTROL 2,497.85
REVOLVING ABATEMENT 1,783.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 102,555.59
TRAC DEVELOPMENT 12,500.00
STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER 10,144.00
SUN WILLOWS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 0.00
METRO DRUG TASK FORCE 2,063.06
METRO DRUG FORFEITURE FUND 382.42
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 1,000.00
WATER/SEWER 265,926.06
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING 22,754.20
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-REPLACEMENT 0.00
MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE 145,152.30
CENTRAL STORES 0.00
FIRE PENSIONS 7,743,96
PAYROLL CLEARING 38,148.65
TRI CITY ANIMAL CONTROL 56,441.00
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 1,263,067.47
3(b).1
CITY OF PASCO
Council Meeting of:
Payroll Approval August 4, 2008
The City Council
City of Pasco
Franklin County, Washington
The follow' l a sumTaqLQf payroll claims against the City of Pasco for the month of
July 2008 whi 4'rpr ed her ewi for your review and approval.
Ga Ity Hager James W. Pise, Financial Services Manager
We, the undersigned City Council members of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County,
Washington, do hereby certify that the services represented by the below expenditures have been received
and that payroll voucher No's. 38164 through 38399 and EFT deposit No's. 30024070 through 30024579
and City contributions in the aggregate amount of$2,169,099.28 are approved for payment on this
4th day of August 2008.
Councilmember Councilmember
SUMMARY OF PAYROLL BY FUND
GENERAL FUND:
Legislative $ 6,702.62
Judicial 66,937.74
Executive 47,884.15
Police 531,245.44
Fire 505,866.83
Administrative&Community Services 306,069.09
Community Development 44,232.18
Engineering 73,943.29
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,582,881.34
CITY STREET 42,470.14
BLOCK GRANT 6,511.52
MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER 5,428.96
AMBULANCE SERVICE FUND 221,763.70
CEMETERY 9,236.42
ATHLETIC FUND 2,265.38
SENIOR CENTER 12,042.22
STADIUM OPERATIONS 0.00
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY 0.00
BOAT BASIN 0.00
REVOLVING ABATEMENT FUND 0.00
TASK FORCE 8,409.62
WATER/SEWER 254,228.56
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING 23,861.42
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 2,169,099.28
Payroll Summary
Net Payroll 1,119,134.78
Employee Deductions 614,823.97
Gross Payroll 1,733,958.75
City of Pasco Contributions 435,140.53
Total Payroll $ 2,169,099.28
3(b).2
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council July 31, 2008
FROM: Gary Crutchfi Manager Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
SUBJECT: Appointments Regional Hotel/Motel Commission
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Letter from Tri-Cities Hotel and Lodging Association dated 6/24/08
2. Section 5 of Interlocal Agreement establishing Tri-City Regional Tourism Promotion
Area
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
814: MOTION: I move to reappoint Hermann Haastrup (Pasco Red Lion) to a two-year
term on the Tri-Cities Regional Hotel/Motel Commission; term to
expire 8/30/10.
111. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Pasco, along with the cities of Kennewick and Richland, entered into an interlocal
agreement in June 2004 to create a regional "Tourism Promotion Area" (TPA). The
TPA is an organization formed as authorized by recent state law to levy special
assessments for the use of lodging facilities within the respective area. In the case of
the Tri-Cities, all hotels/motels within the boundaries of the three cities are required
to collect from users of their facilities the fee of $1.50 for each room night used.
That fee is remitted by each of the hotels/motels to the state; the state, in turn,
distributes the funding back to the respective cities within which it was collected
(much like the long-standing 2% hotel/motel tax) and the cities distribute it to the
TPA for expenditure in accordance with the business plan and budget established by
the Regional Hotel/Motel Commission.
B) The Regional Hotel/Motel Commission is established under Section 5 of the
Interlocal Agreement. The Commission consists of six voting members; two
appointed by each of the three cities from nominees offered by the Tri-City Hotel
Lodging Association. Any vacancy is to be filled by the respective city from a list of
nominees offered by the Association.
C) The Tri-Cities Hotel Lodging Association recommends that Hermann Haastrup
(manager of the Pasco Red Lion)be reappointed.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Mayor Olson recommends that City Council reappoint Mr. Haastrup as
recommended by the Tri-Cities Hotel Lodging Association, without interview.
3(c)
-
PASCO 011 1' HALL
FF C E I\1 Fr)
-ITY iviANA,iER'S
DFFICE
P.O. BOX 2039
Richland, WA 49352
June 24, 2008
Mr. Gary Crutchfield
Third Floor
525 N. Third Ave
Pasco, WA 99301
Dear Mr. Crutchfield:
This letter is in reference to the Pasco TPA Commissioner position, currently held
by Hermann Haastrup from the Pasco Red Lion. Herman's term will expire in
August 2008.
The Tri-Cities Hotel & Lodging Association has nominated Herman Haastrup to
continue serving on the TPA on behalf of Pasco as our first choice. Jill Maher
from the Holiday Inn Express & Suites in Pasco was nominated as the alternate
candidate.
If you have any questions regarding this issue, please do not hesitate to contact
me at 509-942-9400.
I 4aS* r I
by M re
Ily M
Prqesidt
Tri-Cities Hotel & Lodging Association
Cc Kris Watkins—President CEO Th-Cities Visitors&Convention Bureau
5. Creation of Tri-City Regional Hotel-Motel Commission.
A. It is understood and agreed that it is hereby created, pursuant to RCW 35.101.130
(1), the Tri-City Regional Hotel and Motel Commission ("Commission") to advise the Cities on
the expenditure of Special Lodging Assessment revenues to fund tourism promotion within the
Tri-City region.
B. The Commission shall consist of six (6) voting Members and three (3) ex officio
Members. Two voting members shall be selected by the Kennewick City Council from a list of
nominees prepared by the Tri-City Hotel and Lodging Association from Operators of Lodging
Businesses within the city limits of the City of Kennewick. Two (2) voting members shall be
selected by the Pasco City Council from a list of nominees prepared by the Tri-City Hotel and
Lodging Association from Operators of Lodging Businesses within the city limits of the City of
Pasco. Two voting members shall be selected by the Richland City Council from a list of
nominees prepared by the Tri-City Hotel and Lodging Association from Operators of Lodging
Businesses within the city limits of the City of Richland. In no event shall fifty percent (50%) or
more of the voting membership of the Commission be selected from the same Lodging
Ownership or Management Company within the Tri-City Regional Area. The City Manager or
his or her Designee from each of the three Cities shall serve as an ex officio member. All
Commission members, voting and ex officio may participate in all discussions regarding
proposed activities and programs by the Tri-City Regional Tourism Promotion Area for
promotion and marketing of tourism. Ex officio members shall not have voting rights, except in
the event of a tie vote among the voting members at which time, each ex officio member may
cast a vote to break the tie. Any vacancy on the Tri-City Regional Hotel and Motel Commission
shall be filled by the appointing City, from a list of nominees prepared by the Tri-City Hotel and
Lodging Association for voting memberships within thirty (30) days from the date the vacancy
occurs.
C. It is understood and agreed that the initial voting members of the Commission
shall serve staggered terms, with one member serving a one-year term and the second member
serving a two-year term. The length of the term for each individual voting member of the initial
Commission shall be chosen by lot at the first meeting of the Commission. Thereafter, all voting
members subsequently appointed to the Commission shall serve a term of two years. No voting
member shall serve more than two consecutive terms as a Member of the Commission unless
such subsequent term is separated by at least twelve (12) months from the last date of service as
a Member of the Commission. A Member may be removed from the Commission by three-
fourths (3/4)�affirmative vote of the Commission for actions deemed to be adverse to the interest
of the Commission. Such actions may include unexcused absences from three meetings of the
Commission within a twelve (12) month period; failure to perform assigned duties and
responsibilities; and conduct detrimental to the best interests of the Commission. Succeeding
and replacement voting members shall be selected by each City as provided above for the
selection of the initial voting members of the Commission.
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 18, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfie anager W/Shop Mtg,: 07/28/08
Stan Strebel, i a ' e & Community
hector Regular Mtg.: 08/04/08
FROM: Debbie Clark, City Clerk
SUBJECT: Disposal of surplus property.
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Memorandum from David Renzelman, Crime Specialist/Evidence Technician
2. Proposed Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
7/28: Discussion n
8/04: Motion: I move to approve Resolution No.3()-1 ]authorizing the sale of
seized/asset forfeiture property considered surplus to City needs.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The Police Department has acquired 53-weapons through seized/asset forfeiture.
The weapons have been processed through the Police Department and are now
available for disposal through a Licensed Federal Firearms Dealer (required by
State law). The weapons are considered surplus to City needs.
B) No minimum price is suggested for each weapon. Staff requests Council to
declare the weapons surplus to City needs, and authorize staff to sell at auction
through a Licensed Federal Firearms Dealer for a price that is in the best interest
of the City. The only other lawful option is to destroy the weapons.
C) Staff proposes to have the auction consigned to H.A. Rowell Auctioneers,
Licensed Firearms Dealer, for a 25% commission on the gross proceeds from the
sale with no charge for transporting the items to auction or advertisement thereof.
D) In comparison with other auctioneers, this proposal is most advantageous to the
City.
3(d)
ORIGIN AL Pasco Police Task Seizure/Asset Forfeitures
Evidence Inventory Disposition Request
18 July 2008
Below is a list representing weapons that have been approved by the Chief of Police for disposal as
excess property. The individual value of each of the weapons described is less than $2,000 each.
request that each of these weapons be classified as surplus equipment and disposed of through and
to only Licensed Federal Firearms Dealers.
CF# BC# Make Model Caliber Serial#
0000473 27079 H&R 904 0.22 AXI60035
0003240 27273 Sig Sauer P229 0.357 AF27999
0029215 28819 Thompson 0.45 AOC36503
00-29116 28848 Beretta 70S 0.38 A39321 Y
011.0169 30193 S&W 686 0.357 ADWO721
0113663 30382 Norinco 1911At 0.45 604442
01-01085 29344 Taurus PT 92 AF 9mm L80776
0233912 37321 Ruger 0.22 13-71917
0235038 37444 Interarms M877 0.357 F264055
0310027 38427 Browning 0.4 513MZ50394
0311488 41024 H&R Revolver 0.32 AJ24909
0311488 42864 H&R Revolver 0.32 AJ26559
0322239 39073 Taurus .38 Special 0.38 PA40862
0339348 40433 S&W 411 VAC0588
0338348 40432 Ruger Blackhawk 0.44 85.40947
03-05618 38078 Ruger MT 11 Long Rifle 0.22 216-44859
0413699 41617 Ruger Police Svc 6 0.357 155-81251
05 38489 306529 Remington Super Magnum 0.12 C310749A
0538499 306583 Glock 19 9mm FCB859US
05-32087 298227 BERSA Thunder 380 0.38 679516
05-37666 303549 Colt Junior Colt 0.25 78313 cc
05-40537 308662 Springfield Savage Arms 120 0,22 P626558
05-44701 313869 New England SBl 12 NK255944
0612776 329129 Marlin 60 0.22 4132798
0625944 343754 Remington 12-A 0.22 496142
06-00601 330723 Ruger P89 9mm 314-19951
06-18070 334504 Ruger P990C 9mm 304-96048
06-21995 338632 Beretta 92FS 9mm BER126741Z
06-26346 344978 Mag Max SSP-86 0.357 74
06-30738 349900 Astra A-100 9mm 5395A
06-35981 356776 Ruger 22-W 22 248-39481
06-37037 358046 Witness EAA-HIALEA14-FLA 9mm AE44328
0638265 359325 Colt Revolver 0.357 61303SA
0707101 377177 Rossi Rifle 0.22 G24390
070710t 377178 Winchester Rifle 0.22 699867
07-25070 394341 Taurus PT 145 0.45 NYK53937
07-25070 394329 Ruger 10/22 Carbine 0.22 246-75009
07-25070 394332 Remington 870 Express 0.12 B242186M
07-25070 394327 Winchester 64 0.32 301695
07-33681 402678 Glock 26 9mm EYZ515
07-34356 403074 Stoeger Arms 0.38 595080
Pasco Police Task 2
Seizure /Asset Forfeitures
Evidence Inventory Disposition Request
18 July 2008
CF# BC# Make Model Caliber Serial#
0745880 417627 lnterarms PPK/S 0.38 S002097
07115880 417624 Beretta 84BB 9mm D42717Y
08-06557 422800 Colt .38 Special 0.38 P-21630
92-00015 11984 Colt Super.38 Auto 0.38 169189
95-28160 266940 Beretta 92F 9mm D551982
98-28557 24605 S&W 66-1 0.357 77K9065
99-08415 25319 Beretta 86 Cheetah 0.38 G08294Y
99-12764 25582 Colt MK lV/Gov't 0.38 FR10386E
99-12890 25586 Beretta 92FS 9mm BER152428Z
99-21298 26005 Browning 6.35mm 419158
99-24122 26167 H&R 676 0.22 AT107517
99-X3332.,, 26858 S&W 5906 9mm TCB 1900
David Renzelman,Crime Specialist
Citified Evidence Technician
RESOLUTION NO. 3 0`
A RESOLUTION authorizing the sale of forfeiture/unclaimed asset property surplus to City needs.
WHEREAS, there are certain items of forfeiture/unclaimed asset property acquired by the Pasco Police
Department and property is surplus to City needs; and;
NOW THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
SECTION 1: The items of forfeiture/unclaimed asset property listed below are declared surplus property
and city staff is authorized to sell such property at public auction through a Licensed Federal Firearms Dealer:
SECTION 2: The city staff is hereby authorized to dispose of said surplus property at auction for a price
that is in the best interest of the City.
Make Model Cal. Serial No. Make Model Cal. Serial No. Make Model Cal. Serial No.
H&R 904 0.22 AX160035 Remington Super 0.12 C310749A Taurus PT 145 0.45 NYK53937
Magnum
Sig Sauer P229 0.36 AE27999 Glock 19 9mm FCB859US Ruger 10/22 0.22 246-75009
Carbine
Thompson 0.45 AOC36503 BERSA Thunder 0.38 679516 Remington 870 0.12 B242186M
380 Express
Beretta 70S 0.38 A39321Y Colt Junior 0.25 78313 cc Winchester 64 0.32 301695
Colt
S&W 686 0.36 ADW0721 Springfield Savage 0.22 P626558 Glock 26 9mm EYZ515
Arms 120
Norinco 1911A1 0.45 604442 New SBI 12 NK255944 Stoeger 0.38 595080
England Arms
Taurus PT 92 AF 9mm L80776 Marlin 60 0.22 4132798 Interarms PPKlS 0.38 S002097
Ruger 0.22 13-71917 Remington 12-A 0.22 496142 Beretta 84BB 9mm D42717Y
Interarms M877 0.36 F264055 Ruger P89 9mm 314-19951 Colt .38 0.38 P-21630
Special
Browning 0.4 513MZ50394 Ruger P89DC 9mm 304-96048 Colt Super 0.38 169189
.38 Auto
H&R Revolver 0.32 AJ24809 Beretta 92FS 9mm BER126741Z Beretta 92F 9mm D551982
H&R Revolver 0.32 AJ26559 Mag Max SSP-86 0.36 74 S&W 66-1 0.35 77K9065
7
Taurus .38 0.38 PA40862 Astra A-100 9mm 5395A Beretta 86 0.38 G08294Y
Special Cheetah
S&W 411 VAC0588 Ruger 22-Oct 22 248-39481 Colt MK IV l 038 FR10386E
Gov't
Ruger Blackhawk 0.44 85-40947 Witness EAA- 9mm AE44328 Beretta 92FS 9mm BER15242
HIALEAH- 8Z
FLA
Ruger MT II Long 0.22 216-44859 Colt Revolver 0.36 61303SA Browning 6.35 419158
Rifle mm
Ruger Police Svc 036 155-81251 Rossi Rifle 0.22 G24390 H&R 676 0.22 AT107517
6
Winchester Rifle 0.22 699867 S&W 5906 9mm TCB1900
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of August, 2008
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Lee Kerr,City Attorney
AGENDA REPORT NO. 40
FOR: City Council July 30, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfielonomlc anager Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
Rick White, Dit 9W
Community & Deve lopment
FROM: David 1. McDonald, City Planner'
SUBJECT: STREET VACATION: A portion of Colorado Ave., Montana Ave., & Pueblo St.
(MF#VAC08-006)
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Resolution and Vicinity Map
2. Vacation Petition
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , fixing 7:00 p.m.,
September 2, 2008 as the time and date for a public hearing to
consider the proposed vacation.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
A. NONE
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. The owners of various lots in Blocks 33, 34, and 35 of the Freys Addition have
petitioned to vacate a portion of Montana Avenue, Colorado Avenue, and a portion of
Pueblo Street. The vacation is being requested to facilitate the development of the said
blocks for commercial purposes.
B. The petition requires the City Council to fix a public hearing to consider the vacation
request. The earliest regular City Council meeting available for a public hearing, which
provides the statutory 20-day hearing notice, is September 2, 2008.
3(e)
RESOLUTION NO. `'
' A RESOLUTION FIXING THE TIME AND DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO
CONSIDER THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF MONTANA AVENUE,
COLORADO AVENUE AND A PORTION OF PUEBLO STREET.
WHEREAS, from time to time in response to petitions or in cases where it serves the
general interest of the City, the City Council may vacate rights-of-way; and
WHEREAS, R.C.W. 35.79 requires public hearings on vacations to be fixed by
Resolution, NOW,THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
That a public hearing to consider vacating that portion of Montana
Avenue and Colorado Avenue located between Superior Street and Pueblo Street and that
portion of Pueblo Street lying between the East line of California Avenue and the West line of
Parcel # 113-484-141, will be held before the City Council of the City of Pasco in the Council
Chambers at, 525 North 3rd Avenue, Pasco, Washington, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on September
2, 2008. That the City Clerk of the City of Pasco give notice of said public hearing as required
by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr
Deputy City Clerk City Attorney
el,.,
r,
/t �'i4t L y w'•�44 N 7.� �q
ti.
.4-j o
� w o
ct 00
t4
T
•
Ak
i .
it
V
1
Jut 16 08 nss: 18p Pon Aarnes (5091 737-3078 p.2
FEE$200
' •
CITY OF PASCO
STREEWALLEY VACATION PETITION
MASTER FILE 4 DATE SUBMITTED:
I, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting
property Hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the
following described street/alley rights-of way:
dd ' r 4&j
uekl a 1!Cn q:h&+ a vy-t-;a s _a F_ Pueblo J y�l aagf_ p f
Cad; arnr;c, +-o -�-�e $u3 c.nrN�� vQ (7°"rcel te113—sfS�' 14-(
APPLICANT, PROPERTY OWIMD(Legal Description)
Print Name: . c-1- Ov+ n7 e.
Sign Name: d 1'7
Address: , t(a W01699362
Phone It Date
Print Name
S
,_
ign e:
Date . �
Print Name: {
Sign Name:
Date
FEE $200
� r
CITY OF PASCO
STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION
MASTER FILE # DATE SUBMITTED:
I, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting
property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the
following described street/alley rights-of-way:
Y N S for a�vd
Ca/��arN�c� +—a -1-4-e Sc.J C-o%CnleX- OF
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNED (Legal Description)
Print Name: -r nl 2e I
Sign Name:
Address: toz 'T v% ,er 0'r.
Phone # 9Y{L,f r2 q 4: -- Date j- ?-ag` w'1`M 3SZ
Print Name: 0- -
Sign Name4"17
Date Z' -
f a
Print Name: M 2 r,
Sign Name:_7_1'
Date 7 17 p
FEE $200
`r mmmml r
CITY OF PASCO
STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION
MASTER FILE # DATE SUBMITTED:
1, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting
property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the
*1111owing sc ri ed street/te� rights-of-way: .
t
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNED (Legal Description)
Print Name:
Sign Name: d7 � � �,` L-17
Address:
Phone # ;F-V/— 272-,z6111 Date �.q
Print Name:
Sign Name:
Date
Print Name:
Sign Name:
Date
FEE $200
s
CITY OF PASCO
STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION
MASTER FILE # DATE SUBMITTED:
I, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting
property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the
following described street/alley rights-of-way:
IV
a v Scti rPr Q /VCl
f_VL29
St,J cvTNcY
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNED (Legal Description)
Print Name:
Sign Name:
Address: /70 ire
Phone # .e:&J Date ?/e%,6 9-0ilevi" W
Print Name: Er L 61•
Sign Name:
Date
Print Name:
Sign Name:
Date
t FEE $200
1 ' • 1
CITY OF PASCO
STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION
MASTER FILE # DATE SUBMITTED:
I, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting
property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the
following described street alley rights-of-way:
r� dd v' Sc� 'v r a lv a(
Ca�i�orN�c. -k-o rnJe"r 0 V Pa. It Jj +
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNED (Legal Description)
Print Name: Me
Sign Name: u, . l l pwrv-c C_ t t 3 —4+ 2-3
Address:2 5,31 St,J C rrllsrJ
Phone # Date �� _ �� q714U
Print Name:
Sign Name:
Date
Print Name: ;
Sign Name:
Date
l FEE $200
' ..t
CITY OF PASCO
STREET/ALLEY VACATION PETITION
MASTER FILE # DATE SUBMITTED:
1, we the undersigned, owners of two-thirds of the privately owned abutting
property hereby petition the City Council of the City of Pasco to vacate the
following described street alley rights-of-way:
alvd
norNe✓X- pF �3a�c� ` 2i' If
APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNED (Legal Description)
Print Name:
Sign Name: (13- q S q — 13 2-
Address: . 37 r 2IS
Phone # Date 0+,5 0y&Na r
d gdz7
Print Name: r ';fy% Jc �-ri, 1 1 l r-"7c_
Sign N '
Date'
Print Name: 3
Sign Name:
Date
AGENDA REPORT NO. 38
FOR: City Council n July 30, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfie anager Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
Rick White, Di c or
Community& conomic Development
FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner--_
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT: Sun View Estates, 21 Lots at 3300 Block of Wernett
Road (All-Pro Contracting) (MF#PP08-001)
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Resolution
2. Preliminary Plat(Council Packets only)
3. Report to the Planning Commission
4. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 6/19/08 & 7/17/08
Note: Preliminary Plat is available in the Planning Office, the Pasco Library, or on
the City's web page at www.pasco-wa.gov for public review.
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL I STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. Z3ZR , approving the
preliminary plat for Sun View Estates.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
A. NONE
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On June 17, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the purpose
of developing a recommendation for the City Council on the preliminary plat for Sun
View Estates. Sun View Estates is a proposed 21-Lot subdivision located in the 3300
block of Wernett Road.
B. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission determined that
with conditions related to sewer service and other infrastructure needs, the preliminary
plat could be recommended for approval. The recommended conditions are contained in
the attached resolution.
C. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received.
3(f)
RESOLUTION NO. i3
A RESOLUTION approving a preliminary plat for Sun View Estates.
WHEREAS, RCW 58.17 enables the City to uniformly administer the process of
subdividing property for the overall welfare of the community; and,
WHEREAS, owners and developers of property situated in southwest quarter of
Section 24, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M. have requested approval of a preliminary
plat; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said preliminary plat which is
named Sun View Estates; and
WHEREAS, following a public hearing, the Planning Commission found the
proposed plat promoted the general welfare of the community and recommended said
preliminary plat be approved with conditions; NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
That the preliminary plat for Sun View Estates located in the North half of Section 24,
Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., is hereby approved with the following conditions:
1) At the time lots are developed all abutting roads and utilities shall be developed to
City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This includes but is not limited to
water, irrigation and sewer lines, streets, street lights and storm water retention.
Sidewalks must be installed no later than the time each lot is developed with a house.
The handicapped sections must be completed with the street and curb improvements
prior to final plat approval. All existing and proposed utilities must be installed
underground by the developer at the developer's expense
2) All intersections will require setback lines for appropriate sight distances. No fences,
utility vaults or pedestals, or other obstructions will be allowed in this area.
3) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "traffic mitigation fee" per the Municipal
Code.
4) The developer shall install a sound wall along the north line of Lots abutting 1-182.
Said sound wail shall be a minimum of 8 feet in height above the grade of the
adjoining I-182 freeway. The sound wall must be approved by the City Planner prior
to construction.
5) The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with construction
inspection service expenses incurred by the City of Pasco Engineering Department.
6) The developer will be required to provide a deposit to the City of Pasco to allow the
City of Pasco to hire a surveying company to perform topographic surveys of the
constructed utilities including manhole lids and flow line elevations, location of sewer
stubs, water valves, water meters, irrigation valves, irrigation services, storm water
catch basins, street lights, fire hydrants, monuments and other pertinent information
deemed necessary, to the satisfaction of the City of Pasco. The developers will be
required to provide as-built drawings for the remainder of the improvements. The
City of Pasco contracted surveyor will be given an electronic copy of the design
drawings to then insert their findings from the topographic survey.
7) The developer shall ensure active and ongoing dust and litter abatement activities
occur during the construction of the subdivision and construction of the houses
thereon.
8) The final plat shall contain 10 to 15 foot utility easements parallel to all streets as
required by utility providers.
9) The developer shall install a properly designed irrigation system with stubs to all lots
meeting the requirements of the Franklin County Irrigation District.
10) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat drawings shall utilize the
published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum.
11) The final plat shall contain the following Franklin County Public Utility District
statement: "The individual or company making improvements on a lot or lots of this
plat is responsible for providing and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults,
secondary junction boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary
distribution system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or
company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and will provide all
necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction and/or connection of any
electrical service to or within the plat."
12) All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the placement of yard fencing
shall be identified in the notes on the face of the final plat(s).
13) All storm water shall be disposed of through means approved by the City Engineer.
14) Submittal & approval of all construction drawings shall be in accordance with the
City's Civil Plan Review Process.
Passed by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 4th day of August, 2008.
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy, Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Deputy City Clerk
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: PP 08-001 APPLICANT: All-Pro Contracting
HEARING DATE: 6/ 19/08 4515 W 9th Ave
ACTION DATE: 7/ 17/08 Kennewick, WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat - Sun View Estates (21-Lots)
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: Lot 2, Short Plat 2008-09
General Location: 3300 block of Wernett Rd.
Property Size: 5.21 Acres
Number of Lots Proposed: 21 single-family lots
Square Footage range of Lots: 8,000 sq. ft. to 13,082 sq. ft.
Average Lot Square Footage: 8,495 sq. ft.
2. ACCESS: The property has access from Wernett Rd.
3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The site is zoned R-1 (Low density Residential)
with restrictions requiring minimum lots size of 8,000. Surrounding
properties to the south, west and east are zoned R-S-12 and developed
primarily with single-family homes. A few duplexs and multi-family
units are located throughout the neighborhood. I-182 is located to the
north of the site.
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area
for low density residential development.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a
determination of non-significance in accordance with review under the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW.
1
ANALYSIS
The City's land use plans for the last 25-30 years have indicated the property
in question should be utilized for low-density (single family) residential
development. While much of the property surrounding the proposed site has
been developed with low density residential dwellings, the site itself has never
developed. The proposed plat can be considered an infill project that utilizes
land within the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary that was previously bypassed
(skipped over) by development.
The applicant is proposing to subdivide the site into 21 single-family lots. The
proposal calls for the development of single-family lots that are similar in size
to the lots in Newton's Addition located to the southwest across Wernett Rd.
The average lot size in the proposed subdivision is 8,106 square feet.
LOT LAYOUT: The proposed plat contains 21 lots meeting or exceeding the R-
1 zoning requirements imposed by the ordinance that rezoned the property
from R-S-1 to R-1.
RIGHTS-OF-WAY: All lots have adequate frontage on streets that will be
dedicated.
UTILITIES: The developer will be responsible for extending the water lines,
sewer lines and other utilities into the plat. A utility easement will be needed
along the first 10-15 feet of all lots. The final location and width of the
easements will be determined during the engineering design phase. The front
yard setbacks for construction purposes are larger than the requested
easements; therefore the front yard easements will not encroach upon the
buildable portions of the lots.
The City Engineer will determine the specific placement of fire hydrants and
streetlights when construction plans are submitted. As a general rule, fire
hydrants are located at street intersections and at a maximum of 600-foot
intervals and streetlights are located at street intersections and at 300-foot
intervals on residential streets.
All water and sewer utilities will come from Wernett Rd.
STREET NAMES: The proposed street name will need to be modified to avoid
confusion with streets to the south.
IRRIGATION: The Municipal Code requires the installation of irrigation lines
as a part of infrastructure improvements.
2
WATER RIGHTS: The property is within the Franklin county Irrigation
District.
FINDINGS OF FACT
State law (RCW 58.17.010) and the Pasco Municipal code require the Planning
Commission to develop Findings of Fact as to how this proposed subdivision
will protect and enhance the health, safety and general welfare of the
community. The following is a listing of proposed "Findings of Fact":
Prevent Overcrowding: Minimum lot sizes of 8,000 square feet or greater will
address the overcrowding concern by providing manageable lots and usable
open spaces. R-1 zoning requires a 20 foot front yard set back and no more
than 40 percent lot coverage providing for open space on the lots.
Parks Opens Space/Schools: The subdivision is too small for the requirement
for a neighborhood park. The developer will need to provide a fee in lieu of land
dedication.
Effective Land Use/Orderly Development: The plat is laid out to effectively
utilize the site consistent with surrounding residential development. The site is
within the Pasco Urban Growth boundary and the development will occur on
land previously skipped over by past development. This development would be
considered an infill project.
Safe Travel & Walking Conditions: The plat provides connections to the
community by way of local access streets. Sidewalks are required to be
installed when homes are built.
Adequate Provision of Municipal Services: Municipal water and sewer lines
will be extended to the plat from nearby lines. All utility lines will be sized and
installed to meet the standard specification of the City.
Provision of Housing for State Residents: This preliminary plat will provide
21 lots for the construction of new dwellings for Pasco residents.
Adequate Air and Light: The lot sizes and maximum lot coverage limitations
will assure the adequate movement of air and light is available to each lot.
Proper Access & Travel: The access street in the plat will be paved and
developed to City standards to assure proper access is maintained to each lot.
Connections to the community will be provided by local streets. The
preliminary plat was submitted to the Transit Authority for review. No
comments were received from the Transit Authority.
3
Comprehensive Plan Policies & Maps: The Comprehensive plan designates
the site for low-density residential development. Policies of the plan encourage
development to expand in a progressive and efficient manner. These policies
also encourage the advancement of home ownership and suggest the City strive
to maintain a variety of housing of residents.
Other Findings: (list additional finds as appropriate)
• The I-182 freeway is located directly to the north of the site.
• The site is currently vacant.
• Each lot developed within the 1-182 corridor whether in the applicant's
proposed subdivision or other subdivisions is required to pay a traffic
mitigation fee of$300.
• Comprehensive Plan Policy LU-3-C encourages development to expand in
a progressive and efficient manner.
• Comprehensive Plan Policy H--3-B encourages the advancement of
homeownership.
• Comprehensive Plan Policy H-2 suggests the city strive to maintain a
variety of housing options for residents of the community.
• Comprehensive Plan Policy H-1-B supports the protection and
enhancement of the established character of viable residential
neighborhoods.
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of the proposed plat the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
(P.M.C. 26.24.070) there from as to whether or not:
(1) Adequate provisions are made for the public health, safety and general
welfare and for open spaces, drainage ways, streets, alleys, other public
ways, water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks, playgrounds, transit stops,
schools and school grounds, sidewalks for safe walking conditions for
students and other public needs;
The proposed plat will be required to develop under the standards of the
municipal code and standard specifications of the City Engineering
Department. These standards were designed to ensure the public health;
safety and general welfare of the community are secured. These
standards include provisions for streets, drainage, water and sewer
service and funding for park lands. This preliminary plat has been
forwarded to the Franklin County PUD, the Pasco School District and Ben-
Franklin Transit Authority for review and comment.
4
(2) The proposed subdivision contributes to the orderly development and
land use patterns in the area;
The proposed plat is located on a site that has been skipped over by
development. The development is an infill project that makes efficient use
of vacant land that was passed over by previous development.
(3) The proposed subdivision conforms to the policies, maps and narrative
text of the Comprehensive Plan;
The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the site for low density
residential development. Low density development is described as 2 to 5
single family units per acre in the text of the Comprehensive Plan. The
policies of the plan (LU 3-C) encourage development to expand in a
progressive and efficient manner and encourage the advancement of home
ownership (H-3-B). Plan Goal H-2 suggests the City strive to maintain a
variety of housing options for residents of the community while Plan Policy
H-1-B supports the protection and enhancement of the established
character of viable residential neighborhoods.
(4) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of any
applicable policies or plans which have been adopted by the City
Council;
Development plans and policies have been adopted by the City Council in
the form of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision conforms to
the policies, maps, and narrative text of the Plan as noted in number three
above.
(5) The proposed subdivision conforms to the general purposes of the
subdivision regulations.
The general purposes of the subdivision regulations have been
enumerated and discussed in the staff analysis and findings of fact. The
findings of fact indicate the subdivision is in conformance with the general
purposes of the subdivision regulations.
(6) The public use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed
subdivision.
The proposed plat, if approved, will be developed in accordance with all
City standards designed to insure the health, safety and welfare of the
community are met. The Comprehensive Plan will be implemented through
development of this plat. These factors will ensure the public use and
interest is served.
5
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of fact
numbers and the conclusions as contained in the staff report of July
17, 2008.
MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings of fact
and conclusions there from the Planning Commission recommend the
City Council approve the Preliminary Plat for Sun View Estates with
conditions as listed in the staff report of July 17, 2008.
PLAT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
1) At the time lots are developed all abutting roads and utilities shall be
developed to City standards as approved by the City Engineer. This
includes but is not limited to water, irrigation and sewer lines, streets,
street lights and storm water retention. Sidewalks must be installed
no later than the time each lot is developed with a house. The
handicapped sections must be completed with the street and curb
improvements prior to final plat approval. All existing and proposed
utilities must be installed underground by the developer at the
developer's expense
2) All intersections will require setback lines for appropriate sight
distances. No fences, utility vaults or pedestals, or other obstructions
will be allowed in this area.
3) The developer/builder shall pay the City a "traffic mitigation fee" per
the Municipal Code.
4) The developer shall install a sound wall along the north line of Lots
abutting I-182. Said sound wall shall be a minimum of 8 feet in height
above the grade of the adjoining I-182 freeway. The sound wall must
be approved by the City Planner prior to construction.
5) The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with
construction inspection service expenses incurred by the City of Pasco
Engineering Department.
6) The developer will be required to provide a deposit to the City of Pasco
to allow the City of Pasco to hire a surveying company to perform
topographic surveys of the constructed utilities including manhole
lids and flow line elevations, location of sewer stubs, water valves,
6
water meters, irrigation valves, irrigation services, storm water catch
basins, street lights, fire hydrants, monuments and other pertinent
information deemed necessary, to the satisfaction of the City of Pasco.
The developers will be required to provide as-built drawings for the
remainder of the improvements. The City of Pasco contracted
surveyor will be given an electronic copy of the design drawings to
then insert their findings from the topographic survey.
7) The developer shall ensure active and ongoing dust and litter
abatement activities occur during the construction of the subdivision
and construction of the houses thereon.
8) The final plat shall contain 10 to 15 foot utility easements parallel to
all streets as required by utility providers.
9) The developer shall install a properly designed irrigation system with
stubs to all lots meeting the requirements of the Franklin County
Irrigation District.
10) All engineering designs for infrastructure and final plat drawings shall
utilize the published City of Pasco Vertical Control Datum.
11) The final plat shall contain the following Franklin County Public
Utility District statement: "The individual or company making
improvements on a lot or lots of this plat is responsible for providing
and installing all trench, conduit, primary vaults, secondary junction
boxes, and backfill for the PUD's primary and secondary distribution
system in accordance with PUD specifications; said individual or
company will make full advance payment of line extension fees and
will provide all necessary utility easements prior to PUD construction
and/or connection of any electrical service to or within the plat."
12) All corner lots and other lots that present difficulties for the
placement of yard fencing shall be identified in the notes on the face
of the final plat(s).
13) All storm water shall be disposed of through means approved by the
City Engineer.
14) Submittal & approval of all construction drawings shall be in
accordance with the City's Civil Plan Review Process.
�. ;.�=_:. ,ICY "`e.•'.� =.
• _. ' .
• "�-r;. .. ` � ,.:.�..<.�n,esx>tF'ak:"�`+t='.. .!!gy�m,�c
r r
� r• ! Jf� �'.! {. � .JJ/)�/(f� �. _Y�E!�•�,+r r`�y'NJ .rC.r' ,�5.��
�// �J(!JI'�ff e' i+r j'Jr/I�J�IJ/ •\ � f ucp�6 Y�.
A-4
Wow
WN
�! /I r'F 0,j,•t r I 'rY Jr. '�,'f,
`9P c17+,t.
Tn
u a
is r �^ ;•,•� ' 'J . ;� 3� y 3�.� v
t�..
lA yid` �• 'l $� ` 'i t1.nAt&I..i 4�'�t• �.
os aeob
� z
w
ze adoa
w •Nz
00 ul
Ct
7c Cal
v
5E a Q
ado
os ado
Of
Cl)
cem
w
3 �
� .0
zs adoa
cto
W K ssc �
U)
Fm W � I
00 LLA
cl)
4-4 � w
r
CIJ Ci) a r
0 pool
a
O
N
aeon
Planning Commission Minutes
6/19/08
B. Preliminary Plat Sun View Estates 21-Lots All-Pro Contractin
Inc. 3300 Block of Wernett Rd MF#08-001
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to
surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed subdivision site.
Staff explained the Planning Commission previously reviewed a rezone
application for the site and recommended it be rezoned to R-1 with a condition
that lots be no smaller than 8,000 sq ft. The applicant prepared a preliminary
plat in conformance with the zoning.
Staff reviewed the written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission and
explained the need for infrastructure improvements corresponding to the R-1
zoning and the need for a sound wall along the freeway. It was pointed out that
the Washington State Department of Transportation responded to the SEPA
notice by stating it was the developers' responsibility to dampen or deflect any
traffic noise that may impact the proposed development.
Staff reviewed the proposed approval conditions and discussed the condition
dealing with the sound wall.
Commissioner Little asked what type of sound wall was considered.
Staff recommended an 8 inch block wall similar to the existing wall west of the
site on the freeway.
Commissioner Little further asked concerning the existence of different types of
walls along the I-182 corridor.
Staff stated that a consistent pattern is needed and recommended.
Commissioner Schouviller asked about sidewalks, curb and gutter currently in
the area.
Staff explained surrounding properties are zoned R-S-12 and are not required to
have sidewalks, curb and gutter. However, property in question is zoned R-1 and
is required to have sidewalks, curb and gutter.
Commissioner Rose asked if the contractor would have the ability to choose the
type of sound wall, and commented he would like to keep the sound walls
consistent throughout.
Staff commented the sound wall would be a condition of approval recommended
by the Planning Commission.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing for comments from the public.
Arnold Haag, All Pro Contracting, 101 Jasper Ct, stated his intentions to develop
housing for moderate income homes in West Pasco.
Commissioner Little questioned the price range of the proposed homes.
Arnold Haag commented the prices would be from $115,000 to $125,000 for 3
bedroom, 2 bath, double garage homes.
Commissioner Little asked the impact of the costs for the sound wall.
Arnold Haag responded the price of the wall was not originally included in the
plan.
Lauren Mitchell, 3605 Agate, stated he was concerned about increased traffic in
the neighborhood, and graffiti if a sound wall is installed.
Lynn Hall, 2216 N. Road 33, stated he was concerned about the number and
sizes of homes proposed being proposed. He was also concerned the project
would devalue homes in the neighborhood.
Staff explained that with the recent current growth in the community existing
homes adjacent new developments have not gone down in value. Staff also
explained that by law (GMA) the community was required to accommodate
growth within the Urban Growth Boundary.
Following three calls for further testimony Chairman Samuel closed the hearing.
Commissioner Anderson stated the sound walls needed to have a consistent
appearance.
Commissioner Schouviller asked about specifying an average price range for the
homes.
Staff stated the City could not require a minimum value for homes due to a
number of court case on the matter. The city can only specify zoning and lot
size.
Chairman Samuel asked about increasing the minimum lot size for this zone.
Staff explained the proposed lots are about 1,000 square feet larger than the
minimum required for the zone. Increasing the size of the lots would make it
difficult to cover the expenses for the sound wall, curb and gutter, street lights
and pavement.
Commissioner Rose moved to close the hearing on the proposed preliminary plat
and schedule deliberations and adoptions of findings of fact and conclusion and
make recommendations to the City Council at the July 17, 2008 meeting.
Commissioner Schouviller seconded the motion.
Some additional discussion ensued regarding street improvements and the need
for a sound wall as a part of the approval conditions.
The motion passed unanimously.
Chairman Samuel stated the Planning Commission would vote on a
recommendation for the City council at the next regular meeting.
Planning Commission Minutes
7/17/08
A. Preliminary Plat Sun View Estates, 21-Lots (Ail-Pro Contracting
Inc.)(3300 Block of Wernett Rd)(MF#08-001)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked for comments from
staff.
Staff stated this item was presented last month at the public hearing where
testimony was provided by the applicant, adjoining property owners and staff.
Staff reviewed the proposed plat approval conditions related to the need for a
sound wall as well as utilities, curb, gutter and sidewalks needs. Staff explained
a power line is located in the front of the property and as a condition of
development it needs to be underground and or a bond needs to be in place to
cover the undergrounding of the power line. This is a requirement that is in
effect for all developments, churches, and in some cases schools.
Staff recommended that the Planning Commission discuss the condition related
to the sound wall.
Chairman Samuel asked if the applicant was aware of the undergrounding of the
power lines.
Staff stated the applicant was aware of the requirement to underground power
lines pointing out the applicant's last subdivision, Sunrise Estates, was required
to undergrounding/relocate power lines.
Chairman Samuel asked if the development would be surrounded by a block
wall.
Staff stated the development has lots that are facing Wernett Street and would
not be required to be surrounded by a block wall. The recommendation would be
for a sound wall to be along the freeway side of this development.
Commissioner Schouviller asked about the existing grade in relation to the
highway.
Staff commented it varies.
Chairman Samuel questioned if the recommendation would need to be revised.
Staff stated it would vary depending on the area.
Commissioner Cruz recommended that the sound wall be at least 8 ft above the
height of the finished highway and questioned the context of a berm.
Staff explained the height of the berm was to bring the bottom of the wall level
with the grade of the freeway.
Commissioner Cruz commented there needed to be a rule or policy that applies
to situations like this.
Staff suggested conditions #4 could be restated to read the sound wall shall be a
minimum of 8 ft in height above the grade of the adjoining I-182 freeway. The
grade in the plat would need to be raised to meet the grade of the freeway.
Commissioner Little questioned if that height would cover the sound issue.
Staff commented it would cover sound issues for the standard one story house.
There may be sound issues for two story houses.
Commissioner Little further asked about the types of homes being built in this
development.
Staff stated this developer typically builds one story houses.
Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Little to adopt the
findings of fact as contained in the staff report of July 17, 2008. The motion was
approved unanimously.
Commissioner Rose moved based on the findings of fact as adopted seconded by
Commissioner Hay the Planning Commission recommend the City Council
approve the Preliminary Plat for Sun View Estates with conditions as listed in
the staff report of July 17, 2008. The motion was approved unanimously.
Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the
first regular meeting in August, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would
cause a closed record hearing to be held before the City Council.
AGENDA REPORT NO. 20
FOR: City Council July 31, 2008
TO: Gary Crutch i anager Regular Mtg.: 08/04/08
Robert J. Alb , u c Works Director
FROM: Doyle L Heath, Utility Engineer
SUBJECT: Local Improvement District (LID)No. 145 —Public Hearing&Ordinance to create
LID for"A" Street Improvements between Elm Avenue and Road 40 East.
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Street Cross Sections Drawing
2. Assessment Map
3. Ordinance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING
08104: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance , creating Local Improvement
District 145 for "A" Street between Elm Ave. and Road 40 East and,
further, authorize publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Utility, General Fund, Industrial Development
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Staff made a presentation to the City Council on March 10, 2008 regarding the
formation of a LID in"A" Street between Elm Avenue and Road 40 East. On July 7,
2008, the City Council approved Resolution No. 3089 declaring its intention to
create the LID and set a Public Hearing date for August 4, 2008.
B) The City staff has been approached by owners adjacent to "A" Street to make
improvements. The owners are interested in forming a Local Improvement District
(LID) for improving "A" Street between Elm Street and Road 40 East with
participation from the City. The owners propose the LID would cover the cost of
widening "A" Street between Cedar Street and Road 40 East, curb and gutter,
sidewalks on the north side, storm water facilities using swales and street lights.
The City would commit to installing the water and sewer utilities, paying for the
widening of"A" Street on the north side between Elm Street and Cedar Street where
existing homes exist, the replacement of the existing bike lane with a new bike path
on the south side, and sharing the overhead costs (engineering, legal, advertising,
etc). The estimated cost to the property owners is $1,691,616. The City's estimated
cost is $455,587. The City's cost for water and sewer, estimated at $179,395, would
be paid by the Utility fund and recovered when development occurs. The remaining
$276,192 could be paid by the General fund or Industrial Development fund.
C) The Public Hearing is to solicit and hear testimony from those for and against the
LID. If Council approves the Ordinance, the affected property owners have 30 days
in which to file formal written protest; if owners representing 60% of the
preliminary assessments file written protests within that time period, the LID is null
and void. Absent such appeal, final design and construction will follow.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Staff believes a project needs to be created to make the improvements to "A" Street.
The project would abut twenty two (22) parcels and facilitates development in this
vicinity. This area is zoned industrial.
B) Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Ordinance creating this LID.
7(a)
w
� U
Ld E-
CL Y O
00 w Q m 0
Y Q z
O
Z �
LLJ
z
w a
Z
d
W
w
N Z -� O
d
O o
Q �
OLO Z Q
w f- T
Ng z W W
0 Q W W
X Z =
w
_ w
� � w
(-:)j o g o LL-
Lo 0 W
N O � IWI �4
(A LLJ
H LL-
_j
� laJ
d U s
N Z
o i__i__I
x Q
X > LL
� ! Q
w Li
4 h
w
Z nO
Y h (L L-I
O
lf)w nY
� Y
z N�
z
X358
Q _ b
.Q ALT ww ww `� —ww �N—�►�► �
IS 3n5YddS
r
13 A 44 Fk-,A
W
IS 3NV)Oa
All
_
son
=
ilt.,tl e'�m+ r -
vnw nww.. �.
Q 1S v'InOSS n
ps iq va r
N
i
o +
QI119 3MAMH t
_ _ r
LLj
N
T
3r w1N3nr VONO3 V
uj_
Z
(Q� Ld
r ,op,,v LN
04
I
r
[[ cO
3AY""'°0TM"
3AY oJnH s < 3AV
M vLHVZenu
_. o Itl 1�
Q I_._� ,
Yl
ys_ C) o
I ( L ' _
3M/3tlOM1rJ�lS s
H n N
M �
III � �1 { III1ytrrII1 _ 141 F4
ep,
��y -ten
3 �l
3nuAkS
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, relating to City
street improvements; ordering the improvement of "A" Street between Elm
Avenue and Road 40 East, to City standards, including curb, gutter, utilities and
bicycle path, all in accordance with Resolution No. 3089 of the City Council;
establishing Local Improvement District No. 145, and ordering the carrying out of
the proposed improvements; providing that payment for the improvements be
made by special assessments upon the property in the District, payable by the
mode of "payment by bonds;" and providing for the issuance and sale of local
improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or other short-term financing
and local improvement district bonds.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 3089 adopted July 7, 2008, the City Council declared its
intention to order the improvement of"A" Street between Elm Avenue and Road 40 East, to City
standards, to include curb, gutter, utilities and bicycle path, and, fixed August 4, 2008, at 7:00
p.m., local time, in the City Council Chambers of the City Hail as the time and place for hearing
all matters relating to the proposed improvement and all comments thereon and objections
thereto and for determining the method of payment for the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer caused an estimate to be made of the cost and expense of
the proposed improvements and certified that estimate to the City Council, together with all
papers and information in his possession touching the proposed improvement, a description of
the boundaries of the proposed local improvement district and a statement of what portion of the
cost and expense of the improvement should be borne by the property within the proposed
district; and
WHEREAS, that estimate is accompanied by a diagram of the proposed improvement
showing thereon the lots, tracts, parcels of land, and other property which will be specially
benefited by the proposed improvement and the estimated cost and expense thereof to be borne
by each lot, tract and parcel of land or other property; and
WHEREAS, due notice of the above hearing was given in the manner provided by law,
and the hearing was held by the City Council on the date and at the time above mentioned, and
all objections to the proposed improvement were duly considered by the City Council, and all
persons appearing at such hearing and wishing to be heard were heard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it to be in the best interests of the City that
the improvement as hereinafter described be carried out and that a local improvement district be
created in connection therewith; NOW, THEREFORE,
LLD 145 Formation Ordinance 080408.DOC
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington (the "City"), orders the
improvement of the properties within the area described in Exhibit B, by the improvements of
"A" Street between Elm Avenue and Road 40 East, to City standards, including curb, gutter,
utilities and bicycle path, as more particularly described in Exhibit A (the"Improvements"). The
Improvements shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications therefor prepared by the
City Engineer, and may be modified by the City Council as long as such modification does not
affect the purpose of the Improvements.
Section 2. There is created and established a local improvement district to be called
Local Improvement District No. 145 of the City of Pasco, Washington (the "District"), the
boundaries or territorial extent of the District being more particularly described in Exhibit B
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein.
Section 3. The total estimated cost and expense of the Improvements is declared to be
$2,147,203 of which an estimated $1,691,616 shall be borne by and assessed against the property
specially benefited by such Improvements included in the District which embraces as nearly as
practicable all property specially benefited by such Improvements.
Section 4. In accordance with the provisions of RCW 35.44.047, the City may use any
method or combination of methods to compute assessments which may be deemed to more fairly
reflect the special benefits to the properties being assessed than the statutory method of assessing
the properties.
Section 5. Local improvement district warrants may be issued in payment of the cost and
expense of the Improvements herein ordered to be assessed, such warrants to be paid out of the
Local Improvement Fund, District No. 145, hereinafter created and referred to as the Local
Improvement Fund, and, until the bonds referred to in this section are issued and delivered to the
purchaser thereof, to bear interest from the date thereof at a rate to be established hereafter by the
City's Financial Services Manager, as issuing officer, and to be redeemed in cash and/or by local
improvement district bonds herein authorized to be issued, such interest-bearing warrants to be
hereafter referred to as "revenue warrants." In the alternative, the City hereafter may provide by
ordinance for the issuance of other short-term obligations pursuant to chapter 39.50 RCW.
If the City shall authorize expenditures to be made for such Improvements (other than for
any cost or expense expected to be borne by the City) prior to the date that any short-term
obligations or local improvement district bonds are issued to finance the Improvements, from
proceeds of interfund loans or other funds that are not, and are not reasonably expected to be,
reserved, allocated on a long-term basis or otherwise set aside to pay the cost of the
Improvements herein ordered to be assessed against the property specially benefited thereby, the
City declares its official intent that those expenditures, to the extent not reimbursed with prepaid
special benefit assessments, are to be reimbursed from proceeds of short-term obligations or
local improvement district bonds that are expected to be issued for the Improvements in a
principal amount not exceeding $1,691,616.
LID 145 Formation Ordinance 090408.DOC
The City is authorized to issue local improvement district bonds for the District which
shall bear interest at a rate and be payable on or before a date to be hereafter fixed by ordinance.
The bonds shall be issued in exchange for and/or in redemption of any and all revenue warrants
issued hereunder or other short-term obligations hereafter authorized and not redeemed in cash
within twenty days after the expiration of the thirty-day period for the cash payment without
interest of assessments on the assessment roll for the District. The bonds shall be paid and
redeemed by the collection of special assessments to be levied and assessed against the property
within the District, payable in annual installments, with interest at a rate to be hereafter fixed by
ordinance under the mode of"payment by bonds," as defined by law and the ordinances of the
City. The exact form, amount, date, interest rate and denominations of such bonds hereafter
shall be fixed by ordinance of the City Council. Such bonds shall be sold in such manner as the
City Council hereafter shall determine.
Section 6. In all cases where the work necessary to be done in connection with the
making of such Improvements is carried out pursuant to contract upon competitive bids (and the
City shall have and reserves the right to reject any and all bids), the call for bids shall include a
statement that payment for such work may be made in cash warrants drawn upon the Local
Improvement Fund or by check or other lawful instrument through the City LID Construction
Fund, LID 145 Account, for and on behalf of the District.
Section 7. The Local Improvement Fund for the District is created and established in the
office of the City Financial Services Manager. The proceeds from the sale of revenue warrants or
other short-term obligations drawn against the fund which may be issued and sold by the City and the
collections of special assessments, interest and penalties thereon shall be deposited in the Local
Improvement Fund. Cash warrants to the contractor or contractors in payment for the work to be
done by them in connection with the Improvements and cash warrants in payment for all other items
of expense in connection with the Improvements may be issued against the Local Improvement
Fund. Alternatively, payment to the contractor or contractors may be made through the City LID
Construction Fund, LID 145 Account, for and on behalf of the District.
Section S. Within 15 days of the passage of this ordinance there shall be filed with the
City Clerk the title of the Improvements and District number, a copy of the diagram or print
showing the boundaries of the District and the preliminary assessment roll or abstract of such roll
showing thereon the lots, tracts and parcels of land that will be specially benefited thereby and
the estimated cost and expense of such Improvements to be borne by each lot, tract or parcel of
Iand. The City Clerk immediately shall post the proposed assessment roll upon her index of
local improvement assessments against the properties affected by the local Improvements.
PASSED by the City Council and APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Pasco,
Washington, at a regular open public meeting thereof, this 4th day of August, 2008.
LID 145 Formazion Ordinance 080408.DOC
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Debra L. Clark; City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Lm 145 Formation Ordinance 080408.DOC
EXHIBIT A
LID No. 145 —"A" Street between Elm Avenue and Road 40 East
The LID is to include the work of installing curb, gutter, utilities and bicycle path, and the
roadway to City of Pasco standards:
In Street From To
"A" Street Elm Avenue Road 40 East
Exhibit A
50927174.1
EXHIBIT B
LID No. 145 -"A" Street between Elm Avenue and Road 40 East
Legal description of the boundary:
That portion of the South half of the South half of Sections 27 and 28, Township 9 North, Range
30 East, and the North half of the North half of Sections 33 and 34, Township 9 North, Range 30
East W.M. in Pasco,Franklin County, Washington, described as follows;
Commencing at the intersection of East "A" Street and Road 40 East, also being the South
quarter corner of Section 27, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M., also being the North
quarter corner of Section 34, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M., in Pasco, Franklin
County, Washington, also being the True Point of Beginning;
Thence Northerly along the Northerly projection of the centerline of Road 40 East, also being the
Northerly centerline of said Section 27, a distance of 40-feet to a point on the North right-of-way
line of East "A" Street, also being the Southeasterly corner of a lot whose parcel number is 113-
730-124 with the legal description being "That portion of the Southeast quarter of the Southwest
quarter of Section 27, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M., Franklin County, Washington,
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of"A" Street as the same now exists
said point also being on the center line of said Section 27; thence Northerly along the said
centerline 330.00 feet; thence Westerly parallel with the South line of Section 27, 330.0 feet;
thence Southerly parallel with the center line of Section 27, 330.0 feet to the North line of said
"A" Street; thence Easterly along the North line of"A" Street to the Point of Beginning"; thence
continuing Northerly along the Northerly centerline of said Section 27, also being the Easterly
line of said lot with parcel number 113-730-124, a distance of 330-feet to the Northeast corner of
said lot; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of said lot with parcel number 113-730-124, a
distance of 330-feet, to the Northwest corner of said lot, also being the Northeast corner of Lot 2,
Short Plat 78-25; thence continuing Westerly along the North line of Lot 2 and Lot 1, Short Plat
78-25 to the Northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence Southerly along the West line of said Lot 1, a
distance of 20-feet to a point being 350-feet North of the Southerly section line of said Section
27, also being the Northeastern corner of Lot 2, Tierra Vida Commercial Phase One; thence
Westerly along the North line of said Lot 2 to the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence
Southerly along the Eastern right-of-way line of Tierra Vida Lane and a 45-foot radius curve to
the left to the Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street; thence Westerly along the Northern
right-of-way line of East "A" Street to the Southerly tangent of a 45-foot radius curve being the
Western right-of-way line of Tierra Vida Lane, also being the Southeastern corner of Lot 1,
Tierra Vida Commercial Phase One; thence Northerly along the 45-foot radius curve to the left
and the Western right-of-way line of Tierra Vida Lane to the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Tierra
Vida Commercial Phase One, also being the Southeast corner of Lot 30, Tierra Vida Phase One;
thence continuing Westerly along the South line of Lots, 30, 32, 33, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48,
49, 50, and 51, Tierra Vida Phase One to the Southwest corner of said Lot 51; thence Southerly
along the Eastern right-of-way of Manzanita Lane and a 45-foot radius curve to the left to the
Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street; thence Westerly along the North right-of-way line
Exhibit B - 1
50927174.1
of East "A" Street to the Southerly tangent of a 45-foot radius curve being the Western right-of-
way line of Manzanita Lane; thence Northerly along a 45-foot radius curve to the left and the
Western right-of-way line of Manzanita Lane to the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Tierra Vida Phase
One, also being about 485-feet North of the centerline of East "A" Street; thence Westerly along
the South line of Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Tierra Vida Phase One to the Southwest corner of said Lot
4, also being the Eastern right-of-way of an un-named street along the Easterly boundary of
Washington Addition, also being 20-feet East of the Western Section Line of Section 27,
Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M.; thence Southerly along a line being 20-feet East of and
parallel to the Western Section Line of said Section 27 to the Northern right-of-way line of East
"A" Street; thence Westerly along the Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street across the
un-named street to the Southeastern corner of Lot 17, Block 12, Washington Addition; thence
Northerly along the Eastern line of Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, and across a 20-foot
alley, and along the Eastern line of Lots 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32. Block 12, Washington
Addition; thence Westerly along the Northern line of said Lot 32, and across a 14-foot alley, and
along the Northern line of Lot 1 to the Northwestern corner of said Lot 1; thence Southerly along
the Western line of Lot 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and across a 20-foot alley, and along the Western
line of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 12 Washington Addition, to the
Southwestern corner of said Lot 16, also being the Northern right-of-way of East "A" Street;
thence Westerly along the Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street across Sprague Street to
the Southeastern corner of Lot 17, Block 11, Washington Addition; thence Northerly along the
Eastern line of Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22, Block 11, Washington Addition to the Northeaster
corner of said Lot 22; thence Westerly along the Northern line of said Lot 22 to the Northwestern
comer of said Lot 22 and across a 14-foot alley to the Southeastern corner of Lot 10, Block 11,
Washington Addition; thence Northerly along the Eastern line of Lots 10, and 9, and across a 20-
foot alley, and along the Eastern line of Lots 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1, Block 11, Washington
Addition to the Northeastern corner of said Lot l; thence Westerly along the Northern line of
said Lot 1 to the Northwest corner of the said Lot 1; thence Southerly along the Westerly line of
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and across a 20-foot alley, and along the Westerly line of Lots 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 11, Washington Addition to the Southwestern corner of said
Lot 16, also being on the Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street, also being on the Eastern
right-of-way line of Spokane Street; thence Westerly along the Northern right-of-way line of
East "A" Street crossing Spokane Street to the Southeastern corner of Lot 17, Block 10,
Washington Addition; thence Northerly along the Eastern line of Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23,
and 24, Block 10, Washington Addition to the Northeastern corner of said Lot 24; thence
Westerly along the Northern line of said Lot 24 to the Northwestern corner of said Lot 24; thence
Northerly across a 20-foot alley, and along the Western line of Lots 25 and 26, Block 10,
Washington Addition to the Northwestern corner of said Lot 26, also being the Southwestern
corner of Lot 27, Block 10, Washington Addition; thence Easterly along the Southern line of said
Lot 27 to the Southeastern corner of said Lot 27; thence Northerly along the Eastern line of Lots
27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block 10, Washington Addition to the Northeastern corner of said Lot
32; thence Westerly along the Northern line of said Lot 32, and across a 14-foot alley, along the
Northern line of Lot 1 Block 10, Washington Addition; to the Northwestern corner of said Lot 1,
also being the Easterly right-of-way line of Missoula Street; thence Southerly along the Western
line of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and across a 20-foot alley, and along the Western line of
Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 10, Washington Addition to the Southwestern corner
of said Lot 16, also being the Northerly right-of-way line of East "A" Street; thence Westerly
Exhibit B - 2
50927]74.1
along the Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street across Missoula Street to the
Southeastern corner of Lot 17, Block 9, Washington Addition; thence Northerly along the
Eastern line of Lots 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, and across a 20-foot alley, and along the
Eastern line of Lots 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 32, Block 9, Washington Addition to the
Northeaster corner of said Lot 32; thence Westerly along the Northerly line of said Lot 32, and
across a 14-foot alley, and along the Northerly line of Lot 1, Block 9, Washington Addition to
the Northwestern comer of said Lot 1, also being on the Eastern right-of-way line of Heritage
Boulevard; thence Southerly along the Western line of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, across a 20-
foot alley, and along the Westerly line of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, Block 9,
Washington Addition to the Southwestern corner of said Lot 16, also being on the Northern
right-of-way line of East "A" Street, being North of the Southerly line of Section 28, Township 9
North, Range 30 East, W.M. a distance of 40-feet; thence Westerly across Heritage Boulevard to
the Southerly tangent of a 55-foot radius curve being the Southeasterly corner of Lot 5, Sunrise
Estates Phase 1, being North of the Southerly line of said Section 28 a distance of 50-feet, thence
continuing Westerly along the Northern right-of-way line of East"A" Street, being the Southerly
line of Lots 5 and 4, Sunrise Estates Phase 1, to the Southerly tangent of a 55-foot radius curve to
the right, also being the Eastern right-of-way line of Anaconda Avenue; thence continuing
Westerly along the Northern right-of-way line of East"A" Street across Anaconda Avenue to the
Southerly tangent of a 55-foot radius curve, being the Westerly right-of-way line of Anaconda
Avenue; thence continuing Westerly along the Northerly right-of-way line of East "A" Street,
also being the Southerly line of Lots 3, 2, and 1, Sunrise Estates Phase 1, to the Southwestern
corner of Lot 1, Sunrise Estates Phase 1, also being on the Eastern line of Lot 2, Short Plat 2002-
10; thence Northerly along the Eastern line of said Lot 2 to the Northeastern corner of said Lot 2;
thence Westerly along the Northerly line of Lot 2 and Lot 1, Short Plat 2002-10 to the
Northwestern corner of said Lot 1, also being on the Eastern right-of-way line of Cedar Avenue;
thence Southerly along the Westerly line of said Lot 1 to the Southwestern corner of said Lot 1,
also being the Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street, being North of the Southerly line of
Section 28, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M. a distance of 40-feet; thence Westerly
along the Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street across Cedar Avenue to the Southeastern
corner of Lot 17, Block 12, Kurtzman's First Addition; thence continuing Westerly along the
Southern line of said Lot 17 and a 20-foot alley and the Southern line of Lot 16, Block 12,
Kurtzman's First Addition to the Southwestern corner of said Lot 16, also being the on the
Eastern right-of-way line of Waldemar Avenue; thence continuing Westerly along the Northern
right-of-way line of East "A" Street across Waldemar Avenue to the Southeastern corner of Lot
17, Block 11, Kurtzman's First Addition, also being on the Western right-of-way line of
Waldemar Avenue; thence continuing Westerly along the Southern line of said Lot 17 and a 20-
foot alley and the Southern line of Lot 16, Block 11, Kurtzman's First Addition to the
Southwestern corner of said Lot 16, also being on the Eastern right-of-way line of Hugo Avenue;
thence continuing Westerly along the Northern right-of-way line of East "A" Street to the
Southeastern corner of Lot 17, Block 10, Kurtzman's First Addition, also being on the Western
right-of-way line of Hugo Avenue; thence continuing Westerly along the Southern line of said
Lot 17 and a 20-foot alley and the Southern line of Lot 16, Block 10, Kurtzman's First Addition
to the Southwestern corner of said Lot 16, also being on the Eastern right-of-way line of
Sycamore Avenue; thence continuing Westerly along the Northern right-of-way line of East "A"
Street across Sycamore Avenue to the Southeastern corner of Lot 17, Block 9, Kurtzman's First
Addition, also being on the Western right-of-way line of Sycamore Avenue; thence continuing
Exhibit B - 3
50927174,1
Westerly along the Southern line of said Lot 17 and a 20-foot alley and the Southern line of Lot
16, Block 9, Kurtzman's First Addition to the Southwestern corner of said Lot 16, also being on
the Eastern right-of-way line of Elm Avenue and on the Northern right-of-way line of East "A"
Street; thence continuing Westerly along the Nor-them right-of-way line of East "A" Street a
distance of 40-feet to the centerline of Elm Avenue; thence Southerly along the centerline of Elm
Avenue a distance of 40-feet to the centerline on East "A" Street, also being on the Southern line
of Section 28, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M., also being on the Northern line of
Section 33, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M.; thence continuing Southerly along the
centerline of Elm Avenue a distance of 40-feet to the Southern right-of-way line of East "A"
Street; thence Easterly along the Southern right-of-way line of East "A" Street a distance of 30-
feet to the Eastern right-of-way line of Elm Avenue, also being the Northwestern corner of Lot 1,
Block 1, Elliott's Addition; thence Southerly along the Western line of said Lot 1 to the
Southwestern corner of said Lot 1; thence Easterly along the Southern line of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and
5, Block 1, Elliott's Addition, also being on the Western right-of-way line of Hugo Avenue;
thence Northerly along the Eastern line of said Lot 5 to the Northeastern corner of said Lot 5,
also being on the Southern right-of-way line of East "A" Street; thence Easterly along the
Southern right-of-way line of East "A" Street to the Northwestern corner of Lot 1, Block 2,
Elliott's Addition, also being on the Eastern right-of-way line of Hugo Avenue; thence Southerly
along the Western line of said Lot 1 to the Southwestern comer of said Lot 1; thence Easterly
along the Southern line of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 2, Elliott's Addition to the Southeastern
corner of said Lot 5, also being on the Western right-of-way line of Cedar Avenue; thence
Northerly along the Eastern line of said Lot 5 to the Northeastern corner of said Lot 5, also being
on the Southern right-of-way line of East "A" Street; thence Easterly along the Southern right-
of-way line of East "A" Street a distance of 30-feet to the North/ South centerline of Section 33,
Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M.; thence Southerly along the said centerline to a point
being a distance of 330-feet from the Northern line of said Section 33, also being along the
Westerly line of a lot with parcel number 112-430-012 with the legal description being "The
Northerly 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of Section 33, Township 9 North, Range 30 E.W.M.,
Franklin County, Washington"; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of said lot with parcel
number 112-430-012, also being parallel to and a distance of 330-feet South of the Northern line
of said Section 33 to Southeastern corner of said lot with parcel number 112-430-012, also being
a point on the Eastern line of said Section 33 a distance of 330-feet South of the Northerly line of
said Section 33, also being a point on the Western line of Section 34, Township 9 North, Range
30 East, W. M., also being on the Westerly line of a lot with parcel number 112-530-057 with the
legal description being the "The Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest
quarter (NW1/4 NW 114 NW 1/4) of Section 34, Township 9 North, Range 30 E.W.M., situated
in Franklin County, State of Washington" of said Section 34; thence Southerly along the
Westerly line of the said lot with parcel number 112-530-057 to the Southwestern corner of said
lot; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of the said lot with parcel number 112-530-057 to
the Southeastern corner of the said lot; thence Northerly along the Eastern line of said lot with
parcel number 112-530-057 to a point being 330-feet South of the Northerly line of the said
Section 34, also being the Southwestern corner of a lot with parcel number 112-530-048 with the
legal description being "The North 330 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of
the Northwest quarter and the North 330 feet of the West one-half of the West one-half of the
Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, all in Section 34, Township 9 North, Range 30 East,
W.M., Franklin County, Washington"; thence Easterly along the Southerly line of said lot with
Exhibit B -4
50927174.1
parcel number 112-530-048 to the Southeast comer of said lot, also being on the Westerly line of
a lot with parcel number 112-530-039 with the legal description being "The East half of the
Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter Section 34-Township 9
North, Range 30 E.W.M., less a strip of land 30' in width along the South line of this property
for road purposes, Less 10' PUD right-of-way which begins at NE corner and Except South
along East Boundary 220"'; thence Southerly along the Westerly line of said lot with parcel
number 112-530-039 to the Southwesterly corner of said lot; thence Easterly along the Southern
line of said lot with parcel number 112-530-039 to the Southeasterly corner of said lot; thence
Northerly along the Eastern line of said lot with parcel number 112-530-039 to a point being the
Southwestern corner of a lot with the parcel number of 112-530-020 with the legal description
being "The West half of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest Quarter
of Section 34, Township 9 North, Range 30 East W.M., EXCEPT the South 330 feet thereof, in
Franklin County, Washington and 30' road easement along the South line Less 10' PUD right-
of-way easement"; thence Easterly along the Southern line of said lot with parcel number 112-
530-020 to the Southeastern corner of said lot, also being on the Western line of a lot with parcel
number 112-530-011 with the legal description being "The East half of the Northeast quarter of
the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter, Section 34, Township 9 North, Range 30
E.W.M."; thence Southerly along the Western line of said lot with parcel number 112-530-011 to
the Southwestern corner of said lot; thence Easterly along the Southern line of said lot with
parcel number 112-530-011 to the Southeastern corner of said lot, also being 30-feet West of the
North / South center line of said Section 34; thence Northerly along the Eastern line of the said
lot with parcel number 112-530-011, also being 30-feet West of and parallel to the North/ South
center line of said Section 34 to a point being 50-feet South of the North line of said Section 34;
thence Easterly 50-feet South of and parallel to the North line of said Section 34 to the North /
South center line of said Section 34; thence Northerly along the North / South center line of said
Section 34 to the North quarter corner of Section 34, Township 9 North, Range 30 East, W.M.,
also being the True Point of Beginning.
5D927174,1
Exhibit B - 5
CERTIFICATION
I, the undersigned, City Clerk of the City of Pasco, Washington (the "City'), hereby
certify as follows:
1. The attached copy of Ordinance No. (the "Ordinance") is a full, true and
correct copy of an ordinance duly passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
held at the regular meeting place thereof on August , 2008, as that ordinance appears on
the minute book of the City; and the Ordinance will be in full force and effect five days after the
publication of its summary in the City's official newspaper; and
2. A quorum of the members of the City Council was present throughout the
meeting and a majority of those members present voted in the proper manner for the passage of
the Ordinance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of August, 2008.
CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON
Debra L. Clark, City Clerk
50927174/
AGENDA REPORT NO. 41
FOR: City Council July 31, 2008
TO: Gary Crutch Manager Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
Rick White, ector Z V-1
Community & conomic Development
FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner_
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan: Comprehensive Plan Update (MF#CP07-002) (City of
Pasco
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Ordinance# 3866
2. Comprehensive Plan (Council Packets only)
Note: Comprehensive Plan copies available in the Planning Office, the Pasco Library, or
on the City's web page at www.Vasco-wa.gov for public review.
3. Beacon Development Land Use request letter
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Conduct Public Hearing
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 3866 establishing a new
Comprehensive Plan for the City of Pasco.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
A. NONE
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires most cities in the State to develop
Comprehensive Plans for guiding urban development. The City's original GMA plan
was adopted by the City Council in August in 1995. The plan is required to be
periodically updated. Pasco is on the 2007 cycle for plan update, and every seven years
thereafter.
B. The Planning Commission held hearings, in September of 2007 (Volume I) and January
2008 (Volume II), to review proposed updates to the plan and make a recommendation
to the City Council.
C. The Council reviewed the initial draft Comprehensive Plan in March of this year, and at
the June 9, 2008 workshop, as well as the June 16, 2008 regular meeting. One additional
workshop was held on July 14th
V. DISCUSSION:
A. After reviewing the draft Plan at the June 16th meeting, the Council tabled action on the
draft Ordinance to allow additional time to address questions related to the critical areas
map. Those questions were answered during the July 14th meeting with the help of a
technical memorandum from Shannon & Wilson Consultants dealing with liquefaction.
Shortly after the July 14t11 Council Workshop staff received a letter from Beacon
Development (see Attachment #3) requesting a slight amendment to the proposed land
use map in the area north of the Whittier Elementary School. Beacon Development
recently built the new housing development (Tepeyac Haven) on 22nd Avenue and is in
7(b)
the process of trying to site another development in Pasco. Beacon Development has
requested that the land use designation north of the Whittier School be set aside for
future mixed residential uses rather than just low density. Staff has reviewed this request
and has determined that it does not materially alter the general intent of the
Comprehensive Plan. The proposal directly supports a number of goals and policies of
the plan related to housing. The proposal also provides a mixed density buffer area
between the lower density land uses to the east and the commercial land uses to the west.
In as much as the City Attorney has advised that the final adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan requires a public hearing, the Council will have an opportunity to
discuss the Beacon Development proposal prior to action on the proposed ordinance. In
anticipation of Council action on this matter, staff has provided two land use maps for
Council to consider. One map with a low density designation north of the Whittier
School, and one map with a mixed residential designation.
The proposed Ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 3104 which established the first GMA
plan in 1995, and adopts a new plan for Pasco and the Urban Growth Area.
ORDINANCE NO. 3866
AN ORDINANCE relating to comprehensive land use planning and adopting a new
GMA Comprehensive Plan for the City of Pasco.
WHEREAS, the Pasco City Council did on August 21, 1995 adopt by Ordinance
No. 3104 a Comprehensive Plan for the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan adopted under Ordinance No. 3104 was
required by the State Growth Management Act (GMA) to be updated and readopted on a
seven year cycle beginning on December 1, 2007; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September
20, 2007 and January 31, 2008 to recommend adoption of a new Comprehensive Plan for
the Pasco Urban Growth Area; and,
WHEREAS, in addition to public hearings and public workshops meetings
neighborhood meetings were held to receive public input on the new Comprehensive
Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the new Comprehensive Plan was forwarded to the Office of
Community Trade and Economic Development on January 18, 2008 for the required 60
day state review; and,
WHEREAS,the 60 day review period ended on March 18, 2008 and,
WHEREAS, the responsible official for the State Environmental Policy Act has
determined the new Comprehensive Plan will not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the quality of the environment; and,
WHEREAS, the development regulations for the city have been reviewed for
consistency with the new Comprehensive Plan and do not require any amendments except
the critical lands ordinance which must be updated by December 1, 2008 as required by
the GMA;and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the Planning Commission's recommendation
will aid the City in anticipating orderly and coordinated development within the city;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO DO ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Ordinance No. 3104 and any amendments thereto be and the same is
hereby repealed.
Section 2. That the Comprehensive Plan consisting of Volumes # I and # II as
indicated in Exhibit # 1 attached hereto be and is hereby adopted as the Comprehensive
Plan for Pasco and the Pasco Urban Growth Area.
Section 3. That the existing development regulations of the City of Pasco do not
require amendment at the time of adoption of this ordinance.
Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after passage and
publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, this 4`t' day of August, 2008.
Joyce Olson Olson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandy Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
BEACON
DEVELOPMENT
GROUP
1221 East Pike Street, Suite 300
Seattle,WA 98122-3930
Tef:206.860.2491
July 21, 2008 Fax:206.860.2094
www.beacondevgroup.com
David McDonald
City Planner
City of Pasco
PO Sox 293
Pasco,Washington 99301
Dear Dave:
Thank you for consideration of our request to change the designation of development uses to that
of Mixed Residential in the area near the intersection of Spokane and Utah streets—see attached
legal descriptions and photo of the area.
We believe the request makes good sense. We have analyzed the surrounding uses and feel that
a project similar to Tepeyac Haven will be a valuable addition to this neighborhood and the City of
Pasco. And, we thought through the request and organized the information such that it could fit
into the City's format for plan changes.
Sincerely
J�,,"V,
John Schroeder
Beacon Development Group
Project Manager
i
CC: Paul Purcell
w
�I ~
w _
Qo N3AAO •
.F TTT FFF-
0 3: 3 w
BE
aC o
]:E
F
E � z
"3H3M
0
cw
� w
Lu
w
' _
z w
Q
M
< 0
1p In
LL < ��
10
Ge
LL
c�
Contact: Catholic Housing Services of Eastern Washington(by its development agent,
Beacon Development Group)
Contact's Address: CHSEW c/o Beacon Development Group / 1221 East Pike Street,
Suite 300/ Seattle, WA 98122
Contact's Phone Numbers: Rob McCann, 509-358-4272
Monique Kolonko, 509-624-5133
Glori Houston, 509-624-5133
Paul Purcell, 206-860-2491, ext. 206,
206-478-4153
John Schroeder, 206-860-2491, ext. 215
206-919-5877
Legal Description of Property: see attached
1. Proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment:
This proposed amendment concerns the Land Use Designations noted in the draft
2007-2008 plan. As shown in the draft plan, the area approximately five blocks to the
east of Oregon and generally to the north of Whittier Elementary is designated for
growth according to the development of uses allowed under the Low-Density
Residential zoning classification. The 2007 zoning map shows this area under a
Commercial zoning classification.
Specifically, this amendment seeks designation of the areas within the legal
description attached (generally around the intersection of Spokane and Utah) as
Mixed Residential instead of the proposed Low-Density Residential or current
Commercial zoning.
2. How will the proposed amendment advance and support the policies and
goals of the Comprehensive Plan?
The Comprehensive Plan identifies 7 Elements, all part of the State's Growth
Management Mandate. The proposed amendment fits within these Elements and
advances and supports specific policies and goals of the Comprehensive Plan(the
proposed 2007-2008 Plan) in the following manner:
Land Use Element: While this proposed amendment addresses general land use
patterns and designations, it is worth noting that the applicant and its client, Catholic
Housing Services of Eastern Washington, have developed one other property in the
City of Pasco—Tepeyac Haven. This amendment would allow for the development of
another project seeking to house Pasco's workforce. The goal (LU-1) and policy(LU-
I-B) of increasing the quality of life within Pasco will be met by this proposed project
as the owner has as a priority the enhancement of the community with high quality
building materials, color variations within the project, and attractive landscaping.
The goal (LU-2) of maintaining established neighborhoods and ensuring new
neighborhoods are safe and enjoyable will be met with this proposed amendment. A
Mixed Residential area would provide a transition zone between the C and R1 areas,
anchoring new Residential uses forecast for the undeveloped area to the north of
Whittier Elementary. This use reinforces the identity of the existing and new
neighborhood, aligning with policy LU-2-A. As noted previously, the applicant's
focus on high quality landscaping supports policy LU-2-1).
The goal (LU-3) of reducing long-term energy consumption and creating community
health will fit with this proposed amendment. The applicant proposes a project similar
to that of the existing Tepeyac Haven which met LEED gold standards and benefited
from working with the Franklin PUD. Policies LU-3-A, B, and E will be met with this
amendment. The result will be a more dense area of residential occupancy close to
schools and transportation.
Housing Element: As stated, the applicant is seeking a general land use amendment.
Specifically, the applicant is proposing this amendment for the purpose of developing
affordable housing. This is applicable to the proposal in that Pasco and the
Countywide Planning Policies acknowledge the need for affordable housing in the
area and encourage the construction of affordable housing, "...particularly for low
and moderate income segments of the population."
The City endeavors to encourage housing for all economic segments of the population
(H-1), strives to maintain a variety of housing consistent with the local and regional
market (H-2), encourages housing design and construction that ensure long-term
sustainability and value (H-4), and supports efforts to provide affordable housing to
meet the needs of low and mid-income households in the area (H-5).
Many of the specific policies supporting these goals will be met by a project such as
that proposed by the applicant. In sum, a change to the Comp Plan will allow the
applicant to develop a project that is located near arterials, community facilities, and
employment areas (H-1-A). The location is such that access will not be through the
lower density areas to the south and east of the site (H-1-B) but rather from Spokane
Street. As with the applicant's Tepeyac Haven project, the affordability to renters will
allow for savings and support services for residents, encouraging eventual home
ownership potential from the population(H-1-E). The creation of a higher density
project in this area will encourage diversity in housing types in the area (H-2-A)
while providing character and variety (H-4-A). As with Tepeyac Haven, the proposed
development will be of appealing quality (H-5-A) and located such that it blends in
with the neighborhood, not creating a monotonous landscape of stereotypical
affordable housing (H-5-C).
Ca ital Facilities Utilities and Transportation Elements: While this amendment is
not specific to these elements, it is worth noting that proposed amendment and project
itself reinforce the goals and policies within the Comprehensive Plan. Namely, the
area is well served with existing utilities and transportation. The City and/or
developer would be able to capitalize on existing services by making this a Mixed
Residential area.
3. How will the proposed amendment advance the health, safety and general
welfare of the community?
Many of the benefits of this amendment are stated above and align perfectly with the
City's Comprehensive Plan (proposed 2007-2008). As such, the welfare of the
community as forecast in this Plan and proposed in this specific amendment fit hand-
in-hand. The creation of an area of Mixed Residential serves as anchor for future
quality development in the area and as a transition between higher and lower intensity
land use types in area. In sum, the land use patterns envisioned by the City favor and
encourage the type of development proposed by the applicant and sought in this
application.
The example of Tepeyac Haven makes the best case for how this proposal will
advance the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Tepeyac (again -a
similar project is envisioned by the applicant if allowed under the Comp Plan) has
been well received by the Pasco community with a significant wait list(hundreds of
families), a clean and quality appearance, affordable housing in an area that needs it
for its burgeoning workforce population, and a neighborhood anchor in what was an
area in transition. The local police mini-station has told the owner of the significant
change in the area since Tepeyac's development. We envision acceptance of this
Comp Plan proposal will allow for creation of another development that will benefit
the Pasco community.
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council July 29, 2008
TO: Gary Crutch a Manager
FROM: Stan Strebel, ministrative and Community Workshop Mtg.: 7/28/08
Services Director r�� Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
SUBJECT: Code Enforcement Civil Violation Penalties
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Ordinance Amending PMC Chapter 11.02, "Civil Infractions"
2. Proposed Ordinance Amending PMC Chapter 3.07 "Fee Summary"
H. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
7/14: Discussion
7121: Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance No._amending PMC Section 11.02.050,
"Notice of Civil Violation"and 11.02.060 "Hearing Before the Code Enforcement
Board"and authorize the publication by summary only.
Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance No._amending PMC Section 3.07.070,
"Code Enforcement Program"and authorize the publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
TV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The Pasco Municipal Code provides for increasing monetary penalties as an incentive for
early abatement of code violations. While this approach is generally effective, in some
cases it has not proven to be practical. In extreme cases, with penalties accruing at a rate
of$500 per day, after 5 days, penalty levels may grow to be unreasonable, and, with no
defined amount,unmanageable.
B) To overcome these problems, City Finance staff has been limiting accruing penalties to
10 days in order that a defined amount may be sent for collection and so that the amounts
do not grow unreasonably. As this practice seems reasonable and practical, staff
proposes to amend the code for consistency. Also, as the Code Board has the discretion
to set the daily penalty depending in circumstances, staff proposes to eliminate the
schedule for penalties thereby allowing the Board the freedom to set penalties as needed.
C) Further, the City has heretofore relied on filing liens upon the real property for securing
of penalty amounts owed This method has not been effective due to the size of the liens
(compared to other more senior liens)and also due to time constraints on foreclosures.
D) With the limit on penalties set at $5,000, the City will be able to pursue these matters in
Small Claims Court where a judgment could be attached to the real property through
Superior Court action and satisfied upon sale or refinancing with no further action on the
part of the City. In the alternative, the City could also assign unpaid accounts to a
collection agency for similar action in District/Superior Court.. Note: As a result of
discussion at the meeting of July 28, staff has revised the Ordinance to provide for the
maximum penalty to be expressed in financial terms ($5,000) as opposed to number of
days (formerly 10 days).
E) Staff recommends approval of the two ordinances to improve the collection process.
8(a)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington. amending Pasco
Municipal Code Title 11 "Civil Infractions," Section 11.02.050 "Notice of Civil
Violation — Monetary Penalty" and Section 11.02.060 "Hearing Before the Code
Enforcement Board".
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco has determined that certain amendments
regarding civil infractions are warranted;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Pasco Municipal Code Section 11.02.050 "Monetary Penalty" is amended
to read as follows:
(5) Monetary Penalty. The maximum monetary penalty for each separate violation per day or
portion thereof shall be as€ellews= set forth in Chapter 3.07 of this code.
;
;
(e) T44d day of earoh,.491mien $300.00;
;
(6) Continued Duty to Correct. Payment of the monetary penalty does not relieve the person to
whom the Notice of Civil Violation was issued of the duty to correct the violation.
(7) Collection of Monetary Penalty.
(a) The monetary penalty constitutes a personal obligation of the person to whom the Notice of
Violation is directed. Any monetary penalty assessed must be paid to the City of Pasco within 10
calendar days from the date of mailing of the Code Enforcement Board's decision or a notice from the
City that penalties are due.
(b) The City Manager or his/her designee is authorized to take appropriate action to collect the
monetary penalty.
(e) in addition to the remedies pravided abeve, the menetaff pe"ty shall 69astitute a lien upefl.
;,aa,7 by law f F l;a..S_fO labor ,ra .. ater-ials(RCW 60 04) (Ord. 3190 Sec. 1, 1996.)
Section 2. That PMC Section 11.02.060(4)(c)(iii) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(iii) The Code Enforcement Board may double the daily monetary penalty schedule if
the violation is a repeat violation. In determining the amount of the monetary penalty for repeat
violations the Code Enforcement Board shall consider the factors set forth in Section
11.02.060(4)(c)(i).
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of Pasco at a regular meeting this 4th day of August, 2008.
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington amending Pasco
Municipal Code Chapter 3.07 "Fee Summary," Section 3.07.070 "CODE
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM."
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco has determined that certain
amendments regarding penalties for code violations are warranted;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON,DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Pasco Municipal Code Section 3.07.070, "CODE ENFORCEMENT
PROGRAM" is amended to read as follows:
3.07.070 CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM:
A) PMC Violations: Fee/Charee Reference
I The maximum monetM penalty for each $500.00 11.02.050(5)
separate violation per day or portion thereof(to
a maximum of$5,000).
4) Est Day O€Vielat}en—)zex X1-09:00 44-.02-.0-50
-2) Seeand Day e€-Violution Texay i W)20.050
�J 11.0ra 020500
4) Fein Day of Vielation P $400.00 i n
���0
sue.) Eae ddh Day Be yan Fetif rays $509.08 i i rn 050
aruvar u�sv �—pz-p�p
6YZ) Repeat Violation Doubled daily 1 1.02.050060 4
monetary penalty
(Ord. 3543, 2002)
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon publication as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council of Pasco at a regular meeting this 4th day of August, 2008.
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council July 31, 2008
FROM: Gary Crutchf y anager Regular Mtg.: 8104108
SUBJECT: Noise Violatio
I. REFERENCE(S):
I. Proposed Ordinance
2. PMC Section 9.61.020 "Public Disturbance Noise Prohibited"
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
8/4: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , amending Section 9.61.060
"Violations," increasing the penalty for subsequent noise violations
and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The City Council recently discussed the possibility of amending the noise
ordinance to permit impound of vehicles associated with loud noise violations
(boom-box, etc.). The impound concept has been used in Illinois for noise
violations but the City Attorney could not find another city in Washington that has
used the impound authority in relation to noise violations. Council requested staff
provide information as to how the current fine system is used by the court before
deciding whether or not to further consider the impound option.
B) Over the past three years, the Police Department has issued 672 citations for noise
violations (most involve vehicles). In 2007, a total of 228 citations were handled
by Municipal court; of those, three were dismissed. The remaining 225 cases
resulted in 152 "full fine" decisions ($250) while 54 cases received partial fine of
$50 (the remaining 19 were somewhere in between). This year through June, 76
of the 110 citations have been adjudicated; 54 received the"full fine" of$250 and
17 received the "partial fine" of$50 (five others in between). In summary, about
70 percent of citations result in the maximum fine of$250.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) It is apparent that despite the court's use of the maximum penalty, the noise
violations continue to occur at a substantial level. Certainly, resident complaints
continue. Council has a few choices:
• Amend the Ordinance to require the $250 fine in every instance (or increase
the fine, also);
• Direct the Police Department to undertake an "emphasis campaign' for
vehicle noise violations (similar to the"Click-It-Or-Ticket-It" campaign);
• Amend the Ordinance to add the impound authority;
Do nothing.
B) Council discussion on 7/28 concluded the preferred action to be an increased
penalty (fine) for "repeat offenders." The City Attorney has drafted an ordinance
providing for an increased penalty(at least $250, not more than $500) for a repeat
offense within a two-year period.
8(b)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, Amending Section
9.61.060 "Violations" Increasing the Penalty for Subsequent Noise Violations
WHEREAS, the City has had a long standing prohibition against the broadcast of loud
music from vehicles within the City which has created a nuisance to other users of the public
right-of-ways and adjacent owners; and
WHEREAS, the existing remedy has proven not to be sufficiently effective to deter this
continuing violation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that repeat violations require a greater penalty to
deter further violations, NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTO, DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That Section 9.61.060 entitled "Violations" of the Pasco Municipal Code,
shall be and hereby is amended and shall read as follow:
9.61.060 VIOLATIONS. Any person found to be in violation of the provisions of this
chapter shall be deemed to have committed a civil infraction and for each violation shall be
subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $250, as the exclusive penalty without the imposition of
incarceration. Each day that the violation continues shall be deemed a separate violation subject
to the maximum fine of $250. Any person found to be in violation of the provisions of this
chapter for two or more offenses within a two 2 year period, shall be subject to an enhanced
penalty of not less than $250, but not more than $500,, (Ord. 3591 Sec.1, 2002; Ord. 2665 Sec.1,
1987.)
Section 2. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its
approval, passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as
provided by law this 4a' day of August, 2008.
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debbie Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
J) "Receiving Property" means real property within which the maximum
permissible noise levels specified herein shall not be exceeded from sources outside
such property.
K) "Sound Level Meter" means a device which measures sound pressure
levels and conforms to Type 1 or Type 2 as specified in the American National
Standards Institute Specification S1.4.1971. (Ord. 3591 Sec. 1, 2002.)
9.61.020 PUBLIC DISTURBANCE NOISE PROHIBITED. No person, whether or
not that person is in actual possession of the noise source, shall create, continue, or
cause to be created or continued, or allow to be created or continued, any public
disturbance noise. "Public disturbance noise" means any sound which:
A) Is specifically included in, but not limited to, those listed in subsection C;
or
B) That unreasonably disturbs or interferes with the peace, comfort and
repose of owners or occupants of real property and causes a noise complaint to be
reported by two or more persons occupying separate residences neither of which
residence is within the same property boundary;
C) Public disturbance noises for the purposes of this section shall include, but
shall not be limited to, the following specified sounds and are also subject to regulation
under the provisions of Section 9.61.030 of this chapter:
1) Any sound made by the use of a musical instrument, whistle, sound
amplifier, juke box, radio, television, or other similar device which emanates
from a building, structure, or property between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m. and is received within a residential district.
2) Any sound made by the unamplified human voice which emanates
from a building, structure or property between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m. and is received within a residential district.
3) Frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds made by any animal,
which emanates from a building, structure, or property and is received within a
residential district.
4) Any sound made by the discharge of exhaust gases from an
internal combustion engine except through a muffler.
5) Any sound made by the operation of any motorcycle, motorbike,
off-road or terrain vehicle in the city on any property not a part of the street
system of the City when such motorcycle, motorbike, off-road or terrain vehicle
does not conform to the muffler standards required for operation on the public
streets.
6) Any sound made by a horn or other similar signaling device
attached to a motor vehicle except when reasonably necessary to insure safe
operation as permitted in RCW 46.37.380.
7) Any sound made by a loud speaker or sound amplifier exterior to
any building for commercial advertising or sales purposes or for attracting the
attention of the public to any performance, show or other event.
PMC Title 9 11/06/2006 75
8) Any sound which is audible at any school, other institution of
learning, court, hospital, nursing, or convalescent facility, or other area where
exceptional quiet is necessary; provided, signs are displayed in adjacent or
contiguous streets indicating that the area is a quiet zone.
9) Any sound made by the construction, excavation, repair,
demolition, destruction, or alteration of any building, property or upon any
building site between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. and is received
within a residential district.
10) Any sound made by operating or permitting the operation of any
mechanically powered saw, drill, sander, grinder, lawn or garden tool or air
conditioner, fan or blower, or similar device used in residential areas between
the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. the following day so as to cause a noise
disturbance across a residential boundary.
11) Any sound made by speaker sound amplifier or motor vehicle audio
system exterior to the passenger sitting compartment of a motor vehicle on a
public street or highway (anywhere within the right-of-way thereof) of a
commercial radio station broadcast, or music from an audio tape cassette,
compact disc, or other recording medium.
�—�► 12) Any sound from a motor vehicle audio system such as tape players,
radios, and compact disc players, operated at a volume and under conditions, so
as to be audible greater than seventy-five (75) feet from the vehicle itself.
13) Any sound from portable audio equipment, such as a radio, tape
player or compact disc player, which,is operated at such a volume so as to be
audible at a distance of seventy-five (75) feet or more from the source of the
sound. (Ord. 2775 Sec. 1, 1990; Ord. 2735 Sec. 1, 1989; Ord. 2665 Sec. 1,
1987.)
9.61.030 MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE LEVELS.
A) Designation of Zoned Areas. The EDNA (Environmental Designation For Noise
Abatement) is hereby established as follows:
1) Residential zones - Class A EDNA.
2) Commercial zones - Class B EDNA.
3) Industrial zones - Class C EDNA.
B) Maximum Noise Levels:
1) No person shall cause or permit noise to intrude into the property
of another person which noise exceeds the maximum permissible noise levels set
forth below in this section.
a) The noise limitations established are as set forth in the following
table after any applicable adjustments provided for herein are applied:
EDNA OFEDNA OF
NOISE SOURCE RECEIVING
PROPERTY
Class A Class B Class C
PMC Title 9 11/06/2006 76
AGENDA REPORT NO. 32
FOR: City Council DATE: July 29,2008
WORKSHOP: 7/28/08
TO: Gary Crutchfiel ager REGULAR: 8/4/08
Rick White, Dir I /
Community& E onomic Development
FROM: Angie Pitman, Block Grant Administrator
Community& Economic Development
SUBJECT: 2008 Community Development Block Grant Program
Allocations and Annual Work Plan Amendment
I. REFERENCE(S):
A. 2008 CDBG Fund Summary and Proposal Summary
B. Planning Commission Minutes July 17, 2008
C. Resolution Amending 2008 Allocations and Annual Work Plan
II. ACTION RE UESTED OF COUNCI JSTAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
7/28/08: DISCUSSION
8/4/08; MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. amending the City's
2008 CDBG Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
III. FISCAL IMPACT
At the September 17, 2007 regular meeting of the Pasco City Council, Resolution 3042 was
passed approving the 2008 Community Development Block Grant Allocations and Annual Work
Plan for activities totaling $755,646. Changing community needs created the need for revision to
the 2008 Annual Work Plan for a net increase in the annual budget of$40,000. The revised total
is $795,646.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On April 1, 2008 Pasco's Consolidated Plan Action Plan was approved for Program Year
2008. Since the adoption of the 2008 Annual Action Plan, community needs have changed
creating the need for three additional projects. A summary of requests for 2008 CDBG
funds is attached in Exhibit A
B. Three previously approved activities were reduced by $87,500 and the funds reprogrammed
to the three new projects and $40,000 reallocated from prior year activities recently closed
out. This constitutes a significant change to the Annual Action Plan and requires a 2008
Annual Action Plan revision be submitted in accordance with HUD guidelines.
V. DISCUSSION
A. Staff presented recommendations for funding at the Pasco Planning Commission Meeting
of July 17, 2008; minutes are attached as Exhibit B.
B. The Planning Commission recommends approval of staff funding recommendations as
presented in the proposed resolution amending 2008 Allocations and Annual Work Plan
attached as Exhibit C.
8(c)
Attachment 1 2008 CDBG Fund Summary - July 28, 2008 Exhibit A
Planning Commission Meeting
Reallocate-Carryover Attachment 1
Page 1
ACTIVITY ACTIVITY/AGENCY HUD REALLOCATE Reallocate
NAME PY ID FUNDING CARRY OVER
2009 2008
City of Pasco-Public Works East Lewis Sidewalks 2004 202 $ 50,000.00 $50,000.00
East Pasco Underground
City of Pasco-Public Works Powedines 2004 213 $ 52 000.00 $52,000,00
City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Fagade
Economic Development Improvement 1fa ade 2005 217 $ 2,939.34 2,939.34
Pasco Economic
Development Economic Develo ment 2005 219 $ 100 000.00 $1001000.00
City of Pasco-Administrative
&Community Services Volunteer Park Upgrade 2006 229 A 20 311.95 $ 18 294.69 $2,017.26
City of Pasco-Community& Downtown FaQade
Economic Development Improvement 2 fa des 2006 231 $ 4Q 000.00 $40,000.00
City of Pasco-Community&
Economic Develo meet Pro ram Administration 2007 233 $ 30 693.14 $ 51693.14 $ 25 000.00
City of Pasco-Administrative
& Community Services Public Services 2007 234 $ 2.916.67 $2,916.67
City of Pasco-Administrative
&Community Services Public Services 2007 235 $ 2,916,67 $2.916.67
City of Pasco-Administrative
&Community Services Public Services 2007 239 $ 2604.17 $2,604-17
City of PasLDevelo mmunity& Downtown Fagade
Economic meat lm rovement 2-4 fa ades 2007 238 $ 40 000.00 $4000000
Catholic Family Volunteer Catholic Family Volunteer
Chore Services Chore Services 2007 239 $ 19 178.33 $ 4.178-33 $ 15 000 00
Boys&Girls Center Roof
Bo s&Girls Club Re lacement 2007 242 24 174.52 $ 24 174.52
City of Pasco-Administrative Martin Luther King
&Community Services Renovation 2007 243 37,445.80 $
25 000.00 $ 12 445.80
City of Pasco-Public Works Handicap Rams 2007 244 $ 536.94 $536.94
$536.94
425 717.53 $120079.95 $266174.52 $40 000.00
FY 2009 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000
2009 Program income (Estimated) $ 10,000
Reallocations
$ 266,175
Total Funds Available
$ 876,175 $ 40,000
7/23/2008
Attachment 2
Page 1
CITY OF PASCO
2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
AMENDMENT 1 - PROPOSAL SUMMARY
1. Program Administration ($105.,000)
CDBG funds are used to plan, administer and deliver housing and community
needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and
laws, and provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit
low to moderate income people.
2. Civic Center -Youth Recreation Specialist ($33,000)
CDBG funds are used to provide for a recreation specialist at the Youth Civic
Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation programs for youth at risk
covering several low-to-moderate income Census Tract(202).
3. Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist ($33,000)
This facility's program is coordinated with the YMCA, Salvation Army and
Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education and physical activities
to school age children Census Tract (201).
4. Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist ($20,000)
CDBG funds are used to provide for a recreation specialist at the Senior Center.
This facility's program is to provide services, recreational, and social activities
for the elderly and disabled Census Tract(201, 202, 203 & 204).
5. Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen ($50,000)
CDBG funds are used to continue operations of Commercial Incubator Kitchen
which will support small businesses, the Farmers Market and provide jobs for
low to moderate income persons in Pasco (Census Tract 202).
6. Downtown Facade Improvement (1 facades) ($84,939)
CDBG funds are used to support business to continue downtown fagade
improvements (3) (Census Tract 202).
7. Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services (4) ($8,179)
CDBG funds are used to provide minor household repairs and wheelchair ramps
for low to moderate income households (City-wide).
1
Attachment 2
Page 2
CITY OF PASCO
2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
AMENDMENT 1 - PROPOSAL SUMMARY
8. Ener2y Efficient Home Program 10 households ($20,000)
Provide 10 low-income households with improvements to their property at an
affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards
improvements (City-wide).
9. Code Enforcement Officer ($48,000)
CDBG funds are used to provide for a code enforcement officer to help improve
neighborhood appearance and for compliance with rules and regulations dealing
with homeowner needs in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods
(Census Tracts 201, 202, 203 and 204).
10. Tri-County Habitat for Humanity (Not funded)
11. Boys & Girls Club -Mainbranch Gamesroom Renovation ($140,000)
Interior renovation project of main branch facility games room. Eliminate 1,000
square feet of hallway space in which youth are currently unsupervised.
Increased games room size will allow for increased recreational and educational
program opportunites (Census Tract 204).
12. Martin Luther Kins Community Center-Drainage Improvements ($50,000)
Storm water flooding damages facility and renders part unusable at times.
Installation of storm water drainage system around building will protect facility
to avoid interruption of services provided to low-moderate income persons
(Census Tract 201).
13. Peanuts Park Restroom Uaerade ($43,156)
Replace restroom facility in Peanuts park with code compliant and ADA
acessible facility (Census Tract 201 and 202).
14. Volunteer Park -Restroom Accessibility Uperades ($120,000)
Extend pathway for enhanced accessibility, construct picnic pavilions resurface
deteriorating parking lot (Census Tract 202).
2
Attachment 2
Page 3
CITY OF PASCO
2008 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
AMENDMENT 1 - PROPOSAL SUMMARY
15. CHIP Minor Rehab Program (4 households) ($37,500)
Provide 4 low-income households with improvements to their property at an
affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency standards
improvements (Census Tract 202).
16. LID Assistance ($50,000)
Provide funding to pay special assessment for ULID #143 for low-income
households.
17. Kurtzman Park Nei hborhood Improvement ($40,000)
Provide funding for planning and design for neighborhood improvement project
(Kurtzman Park)—Phase I in 2009-2010.
3
Exhibit B
REGULAR MEETING JULY 1 7, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
WORKSHOP:
A. CDBG 2008 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Annual Action Plan Amendment (City-
Wide) (MF# CDBG 08-003)
Chairman Samuel asked staff for a report.
Angie Pitman, Community Development Block Grant Administrator, explained
that the 2008 Annual Action Plan was approved last year and since then
community needs have changed creating the need for a revision. Three new
projects were created by reallocating funding from three 2008 activities and from
surplus funds not used for 2009 Annual Action Plan Activities.
Chairman Samuel asked if any applicants who had not received funding as
requested in the 2008 Annual Action Plan cycle had been contacted for these
additional monies. Angie Pitman explained that whenever a significant change is
made to the Annual Action Plan, the requirement per the Consolidated Plan was
to bring the proposed change before the Planning Commission, and obtain City
Council approval. The proposed change is then made available for public
comment for 30 days prior to submission to HUD for approval. The recipient is
granted some flexibility in administering CDBG funds. Citizen Participation
requirements were met during formation of the plan.
Commissioner Kempf moved that the proposed Resolution and Exibit A,
amending the 2008 Annual Action Plan be recommended to City Council for
Action.
Commissioner Hay seconded, motion carried unanimously.
- 1 -
Exhibit C
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION amending the Program Year 2008 Community Development Block
Grant Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
WHEREAS, The City annually receives an entitlement of funds from HUD and budgets
those funds according to program rules and community needs; and
WHEREAS, staff has previously prepared the Program Year 2008 Annual Action Plan
for activities totaling $755,656 based on an estimated grant award; and
WHEREAS, since the adoption of the 2008 Annual Action Plan community needs have
changed creating the need for a revision; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed revision as shown in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Pasco City Council hereby amends the Community Development
Block Grant Annual Work Plan for the 2008 program year is hereby revised as indicated in the
Exhibit "A" attached hereto:
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr
Deputy City Clerk City Attorney
C) o o ^ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o o° 5 0 o o•
CD 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0
U ds sus os O EA F,s 64 b4 sk c� Gf3 EA 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ln o 0 0
z o o m
r�q �64 64 '604
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �c 0 0 0 0 0
? o0 0000000 00tno0o 00 0
Q
3 o ri ri o o N 0 00 0 o m
O M M N v1 fV I�t "Zr kn N CM v) "Zt
Vi
� kn � C
� O
bR fA
Q
> Q
boC) 00000000000
00 0000000 CD a) 0 ol
Q ° 0 0 0 n o `
O CA "T O 00 O O M O kn
O M M N kn N d Ln 00 110 110 �3 n y
kn
O O kn 0. C
CJ O 0 os 94 N y0 3 O
N
U Cd
pq u 00
0 0 E o
a�
✓ cc M m
u v r� 0 3
U _c a�
r
Qti
fA
a�
O O tl,
s
CA e c� _� CM ca
mo I-Rte, o 0 0 0 Q
U ° ? O w I F S c
a� 'o x � � D o ` '�_ v
O
to
= = s ..
O U
l- 00 Q, O N M .4 v1 n v cv v v
,� •-- N M eh V•1 �O
AGENDA REPORT NO. 31
FOR: City Council DATE: July 29, 2008
WORKSHOP: 7/28/08
TO: Gary Crutchfi anager� REGULAR: 8/4/08
Rick White, Di or ((GG
Community& or
Development Department
FROM: Angie Pitman, Block Grant Administrator
Community& Economic Development
SUBJECT: 2009 Community Development Block Grant Proeram
Allocations and Annual Work Plan
I. REFERENCE (S):
A. 2009 CDBG Fund Summary and Proposal Summary
B. Planning Commission Minutes June l9,2008 and July 17, 2008
C. Resolution Approving 2009 Allocations and Annual Work Plan
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
7/28/08: DISCUSSION
8/4/08: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. ,approving the City's
2009 CDBG Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
III. FISCAL IMPACT
It is estimated that a total of $876,175 will be available for use in meeting the goals of the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2009 Annual Work Plan. This estimated
combined total is from the following sources; an estimated entitlement grant of approximately
$600,000 from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, program income
estimated at $10,000, and reallocations totaling $266,175. Surplus funds totaling $25,000 are
recommended to be reallocated for amended 2008 Annual Action activities. In the event of a
funding shortfall, funding for program activities will be reduced in accordance with HUD
guidelines.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. A Request for Proposals for 2009 CDBG Program Year Funds was published in the Tri-
City Herald and La Voz Hispanic newspapers. Thirteen (13) proposals for projects were
received totaling $921,684. Approximately $851,175 is for funding 2009 activities. A
summary of requests for CDBG funds is attached in Exhibit A.
B. All proposed activities are eligible for funding under U.S. Housing and Urban
Development Department regulations. HUD regulations state that the amount of CDBG
Funds obligated within a program year to support public service activities may not exceed
15%of the total entitlement plus prior year program income.
C. The Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on June 19, 2008 and July 17, 2008. The
public hearing, which was advertised in the Tri-City Herald and La Voz Hispanic
Newspapers in English and Spanish, solicited public comment either for or against any
application for funding, or reallocation for the City of Pasco 2009 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. At the public hearing twelve (12)
presentations were made relating to proposed activities. Meeting minutes are attached in
Exhibit B.
V. DISCUSSION
A. Staff presented recommendations for funding at the June 19, 2008 and July 17, 2008 Pasco
Planning Commission meetings. The Planning Commission recommends approval of staff
funding recommendations as presented in the proposed Resolution Approving 2009
Allocations and Annual Work Plan attached as Exhibit C.
8(d)
Attachment 1 2009 CDBG Fund Summary -Aug 4, 2008 Exhibit A
Planning Commission Meeting
Proposals-Recommendations Attachment 1
Page 1
ACTIVITY/AGENCY CDBG NonCDBG FUNDS STAFF PLANNING
ID Recipients COMMISSION
NAME REQUEST Contribution RECOMMEND
RECOMMEND
City of Pasco-Community
1 1&Economic Development Program Administration $110,000,00 $0.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00
City of Pasco-
Administrative& Civic Center-Youth
2 C Services Recreation Specialist $37,50000 $43,500.00 $30,000.00
3 lCity of Pasco- Martin Luther King
Administrative& Community Center
CommunityServices Recreation S cialist $37,500-00 $96,500.00 $30,000.00 $30,000-00
City of Pasco-
Administrative& Senior Citizen's Center
4 Community Services Recreation Specialist $37,500,00 $200,000,00 20000-00 $20,000.00
Pasco Downtown Pasco Downtown
Development Association- Development Commercial
5 SK Kitchen $65 000.00 $34,000.00 $65,000.00 $65,000.00
City of Pasco-Community Downtown Facade
6 &Economic Develo ment Improvement 4 fa ades 80 000.00 $20,000.00 $80 000.00 $80,000.00
Catholic Family&Child Catholic Family Volunteer
7 Services-Pasco Chore Services 4 $4,000.00 $117,614.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00
Benton Franklin CAC- Energy Efficient Home
8 Home Energy Program 10 households $20,000-00 $20,000.00 $20,000-00 $20,000-00
Habitat for Humanity Tierra
Tri-County Partners, Vida Project Support(12
9 Habitat for Humanity Homes) $32,184.00 $1,152,000.00 $0.00 $0.00
Boys&Girts Club of Program Space
Benton&Franklin Expansion,Safety
10 Counties Enhancement $50,000-00 $5,00&00 $50 000.00 $50 000.00
City of Pasco- Martin Luther King
Administrative& Community Center-South
11 Community Services End G m Remodel $100,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00 $100,000.00
City of Pasco-inspection
12 Services Code Enforcement Officer W,000.00 $17,025.00 W,000-00 $48,000.00
Kurtzman Park
City of Pasco-Public Neighborhood
13 Works Improvement $300,000.00 $1,500,000-00 $294,175.00 $294,175.00
921,684.00 $3,205,639.00 851 175.00..1 ..$851,175.00
FY 2009 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000
2009 Program income(Estimated) $ 10,000
Reallocations $ 266,175
Total Funds Available $ 876,175
Proposals Recommended $ 851,176
SURPLUSIDEFICIT $ 25,000
7/3012008
Attachment 1 2009 CDBG Fund Summary - Aug 4, 2008 Attachment 1
Planning Commission Meeting Page 2
Reallocate-Ca rryover
ACTIVITY/AGENCY HUD REALLOCATE
ACTIVITY NAME PY ID FUNDING CARRY OVER 2009
City of Pasco-Public Works East Lewis Sidewalks 2004 202 50 000.00 $50,000.00
East Pasco Underground
City of Pasco-Public Works Powerlines 2004 213 $ 52 000.00 $52,000.00
City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Fagade
Economic Development Improvement(1facade) 2005 217 $ 2,939.34 $ 2,939.34
Pasco Economic
Development Economic Development 2005 219 $ 100 000.00 $100,000-00
City of Pasco-Administrative
&Community Services Volunteer Park Upgrade 2006 229 $ 20 311.95 $20,311.95
City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Fagade
Economic Development Improvement 2 facades) 2006 231 40 000.00 $40,000-00
City of Pasco-Community&
Economic Development Program Administration 2007 233 $ 30 693.14 $30,693.14
City of Pasco-Administrative
&Community Services Public Services 2007 234 2,916.67 $2,916,67
City of Pasco-Administrative
&Community Services Public Services 2007 235 1 2,916.67 $2,916.67
City of Pasco-Administrative
&Community Services Public Services 2007 239 2,604.17 $2,604.17
City of Pasco-Community& Downtown Facade
Economic Development Improvement 2-4 fa des 2007 238 $ 40 000.00 $40,000.00
Catholic Family Volunteer Catholic Family Volunteer
Chore Services Chore Services 2007 239 19 178.33 $ 4,178.33 $ 15,000-00
Boys&Girls Center Roof
Boys&Girls Club Replacement 2007 242 $ 24 174.52 24,174. 2
City of Pasco-Administrative Martin Luther King
&Communitv Services Renovation 2007 243 $ 37 445.80 $ 12 445.80 25 000.00
City of Pasco-Public Works Handicap Rams 2007 244 536.94 $536.94
$ 425 717.53 $159,543.01 $266,174-5
FY 2009 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000
2009 Program Income(Estimated) $ 10,000
Reallocations $ 266,175
Total Funds Available $ 876,175
7/30/2008
Attachment 1 2009 CDBG Fund Summary - Aug 4, 2008 Attachment 1
Planning Commission Meeting Page 3
Public Service Cap
ID ACTIVITY ACTIVITY!AGENCY CDBG NonCDBG FUNDS CARRY OVER STAFF
NAME REQUEST RECOMMEND
Contribution
City of Pasco-
Administrative& Civic Center-Youth
2 lCommunity Services Recreation Specialist $37,500.00 $42,500.00 $3,125.00 $30,000.00
City of Pasco- Martin Luther King
Administrative& Community Center
3 Community Services Recreation Specialist $37,500.00 $89,200.00 $3,125.00 $30,000.00
City of Pasco-
Administrative& Senior Citizen's Center
4 Community Services Recreation Specialist $37,500.00 $191,250.00 $2,416.66 $20,000.00
$112,500.00 J $322,950.00 $8,666.66 $80 000.00
FY 2009 Entitlement(Estimated) $ 600,000
2008 Program Income (Actual) $ 12,914
Total Funds Subject to Public Services Cap $ 612,914
Public Services Cap 15% $ 91,937
Public Services Recommended 14% $ 88,667
7/30/2008
Attachment 2
CITY OF PASCO
2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 28, 2008
1. Program Administration ($110,000)
CDBG funds are requested to plan, administer and deliver housing and community
needs, ensure compliance with local, state and federal rules, regulations and laws, and
provide for the successful delivery of programs that primarily benefit low to moderate
income people.
2. Civic Center-Youth Recreation Specialist($30,000)
CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation
specialist at the Youth Civic Center. This facility's program is to provide recreation
programs for youth at risk covering low-to-moderate income Census Tract (202).
3. Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist ($30,000)
CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation
specialist at the Martin Luther King. This facility's program is coordinated with the
YMCA, Salvation Army and Campfire USA, who all collaborate to provide education
and physical activities to school age children and youth in Census Tract (201).
4. Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist ($20,000)
CDBG funds are requested to provide a portion of the salary and benefits for recreation
specialist to oversee and operate program at Pasco's senior center. This facility's
program provides supervision and leadership necessary for programs serving the elderly
with support services, nutrition, health and living skills support.
5. Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen ($65,000)
CDBG funds are requested to continue operations of the Pasco Specialty Kitchen, a
certified commercial incubator kitchen. By providing technical support to small food-
related businesses the Pasco Specialty Kitchen improves their success rate by helping
them to establish and achieve their goals. In consideration for technical assistance, the
startup businesses agree to make jobs created available to low-to-moderate income
persons in Pasco (Census Tract 202).
6. Downtown Facade Improvement (4 facades) ($80,000)
CDBG funds are requested to support business to continue downtown facade
improvements, for four new projects are anticipated for 2009 (Census Tract 202).
7. Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services (1) ($4,000)
CDBG funds are requested to provide minor household repairs and wheelchair ramps for
very low to low income households. This population includes elderly and disabled. This
year a roof repair program will be added to Volunteer Chore Services activities (City-
wide).
1 7/30/2008
Attachment 2
CITY OF PASCO
2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
PROPOSAL SUMMARY—JULY 28, 2008
8. Energy Efficient Home Program (10 households) ($20,000)
CDBG funds are requested to provide 10 low-income households with improvements to
their property at an affordable cost, including health/safety codes and energy effiency
standards improvements (City-wide).
10. Boys & Girls Club - Program Space Expansion Safety Enhancement $50000)
CDBG funds are requested to renovate the stage and lighting in the gym to replace 50-
year old equipment with modern lighting providng a brigther, safer, more energy
efficient lighting for increased programing to meet the needs of 5-year olds.
11. Martin Luther King Community Center -South End Gym Remodel ($100,000)
CDBG funds are requested to renovate 1,700 sq ft of unusable space in the gym wing at
the Martin Luther King Center. Renovation will reclaimed space to allow for expanded
programs for low-to-moderate income children and youth. The remodel will convert five
small rooms to three more functional rooms, providing programmable space for
supervised recreation for low-moderate income persons who have been underserved
because of restricted facilities. The expanded program will utilize the YMCA character
development mode and allow for computer lab/homework center and multipurpose
classroom, and benefit both youth and their families.
12. Code Enforcement Officer ($48,000)
CDBG funds are requested to provide for a code enforcement officer to help improve
neighborhood appearance and for compliance with rules and regulations dealing with
homeowner needs in primarily low to moderate income neighborhoods (Census Tracts
201, 202, 203 and 204).
13. Kurtzman Park Neighborhood Improvements—Phase 1 ($294,175)
CDBG funds are requested to provide street and/or sidewalks in the Kurtzman Park
neighborhood area to create a safe route to school for neighborhood children (Census
Tract 201).
2 7/3112008
Exhibit B
REGULAR MEETING JUNE 19, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NEW BUSINESS:
A. CDBG 2009 Community Development Block Grant
ICDBG) Program Allocations and Annual Work
Plan (Project Presentations) IMF# CDBG 08-002)
Chairman Samuel made some introductory comments and asked staff for a
report.
Angie Pitman, Community Development Block Grant Administrator provided a
brief overview of the CDBG program and explained the city would be receiving
about $600,000 in CDBG funds for 2009. In addition there would be
approximately 10 000 in program income and $217,000 available from
reallocation of prior year activities. For 2009 the City will have an estimated
total of $827,000 for project activities.
Angie Pitman explained 13 project proposals had been received requesting a
total of $921,000.
Chairman Samuel opened the hearing and explained that each applicant would
be permitted to make a brief presentation to explain their proposed project.
City of Pasco - Community & Economic Development (Program
Administration)
Dave McDonald, City Planner - ($110,000 requested) stated the application was
for Program Administration to offset costs of administration of the 2009 CDBG
Program. The funds were necessary to cover program costs incurred by the city
including program oversight, salaries and benefits of the Block Grant
Administrator and Secretary II position as well as other related costs.
City of Pasco - Administrative & Community Services (Civic Center - Youth
Recreation Specialist)
Paul Whitemarsh Recreation Services Manager - ($37,500 requesteil requested stated the
application was for the continuation of recreation programs provided at the Civic
Center in City Hall. The program focuses on low-moderate income at-risk youth
and offers an after-school program which runs Monday-Friday after school into
the evening and in the summer hours are all day from Monday-Friday.
Chairman Samuel questioned the increase of $4,500 in this year's request.
- 1 -
Paul Whitemarsh responded the increase was due to inflation, as well as
maintaining the current programs available.
Commissioner Schouviller questioned the types of programs available.
Paul Whitemarsh mentioned the drop-in programs and scheduled activities.
After-school programs include rock-climbing, basketball, volleyball, and floor
hockey. Table games are also available. Homework is encouraged and assistance
is available from the gym supervisor. Scheduled activities include youth and
adult basketball camps and clinics, leagues, as well as the ability for team
practices to be held in the facility.
City of Pasco - Administrative & Community Services (Martin Luther King
Community Center - Recreation Specialist)
Paul Whitemarsh Recreation Services Manager - ($37,500 requested) explained
the funds were requested to operate programs for youth similar to the programs
in the civic center. The YMCA has been operating the programs for the city with
United Way dollars. The United Way funding has been cut from this program.
Chairman Samuel questioned where the non-CDBG funds come from.
Mr. Whitemarsh stated the matching funds will be provided by the City, and not
United Way.
City of Pasco - Administrative & Community Services (Senior Citizen's
Center - Staff for Senior Center)
Paul Whitemarsh, Recreation Services Manager - ($37,500 requested) stated this
program involves a range of activities at the senior center including recreational
activities, social services, health screening, a foot care program and an income
tax assistance program. The salary of the Recreation Specialist and Secretary is
supplemented with this request. They are responsible for coordinating services
for this center.
Commissioner Rose asked about the use of vans for event transportation.
Paul Whitemarsh stated buses are chartered for out-of-town activities.
Pasco Downtown Development Association PDDA (Pasco Specialty Kitchenl
Victoria Silvernail, Manager - ($65,000 requested) explained the kitchen
provides services to 31 individuals. Six individuals have been able to move out
to their own store fronts. Other partners include the PDDA and the Pasco
School District which operates the Commercial Food Academy giving low income
students training in food sciences, product creation and marketing etc.
- 2 -
Pasco Downtown Development Association (Downtown Facade
Improvement
Gloria Garcia Vice President PDDA - ($80,000 requested) explained the various
programs of the PDDA and stated the facade program provides funding to
businesses to make physical improvements to buildings to improve the look of
the downtown area. The program provides 75% up to a maximum of $20,000
and the applicants contribute 25% or the remaining portion of the project costs.
Commissioner Little questioned the average cost of a fagade.
Gloria Garcia stated $20,000 was the average.
Catholic Family & Child Services CFCS (Catholic Family Volunteer Chore
Service
Shari Hallman, 2110 W. Henry St Pasco, WA - ($4,000 requested) stated her
program has been functioning in the state for 28 years. They provided
assistance to low income individuals, elderly and others with disabilities by
constructing handicap ramps, rails and other minor home repairs. The funding
is for materials only. All work is performed by volunteers.
Commissioner Schouviller asked if there were any other funding sources.
Ms. Hallman stated they received $10,000 from United Way this year, donations
from individuals and some funding from the state for ramps and roofing.
Benton Franklin Community Action Committee (BFCAC) - Energy Efficient
Healthy House Program
David Odom Weatherization Department Director, BFCAC - ($20,000 requested)
Stated the CAC provides weatherization services for low-income families as well
as work on furnaces, water heaters and other conservation measures. The
funding is requested to continue with these activities.
Commissioner Rose asked who is eligible for this program.
David Odom stated they get referrals from the Energy Assistance Program which
is for low income and elderly people.
Tri-County Partners Habitat for Humanity (aka) Habitat for Humanity Tri-
Cities (Habitat for Humanity's Tierra Vida Project Support)
Angie Pitman stated the applicant has withdrawn their application.
- 3 -
Boys & Girls Clubs of Benton & Franklin Counties (Program Space
Expansion and Safety Enhancement)
Ron McHenry, Vice-President of Finance - ($50,000 requested) stated this
program was for renovation and safety improvements to the stage area of the
Boys and Girls Club. These improvements are needed to continue with services
to the low and moderate income kids who use the facility.
City of Pasco - Administrative and Community Services/YMCA (Martin
Luther King Center Gym Remodel]
Paul Whitemarsh, Recreation Services Manager -- ($100,000 requested)
explained the request was for partial renovation of the gym wing into usable
space. The project was continued from last year. The renovation will create a
more functional area in which to provide services to the neighborhood.
City of Pasco - Community & Economic Development Inspection Services
Department (Provide Inspection Services in Low-and Moderate-Income
areas of Pasco)
Dave McDonald, City Planner -- ($48,000 requested) explained the request
provides partial funding of a code enforcement officer. This program has been in
place for 20 years. The area of focus for this officer is in census tracts 201
through 204 which are identified as low-and moderate-income areas of Pasco.
City of Pasco - Public Works (Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk and Roadway
Improvements)
Dave McDonald, City Planner - ($300,000 requested) stated the project include
the construction of curb, gutter, sidewalk and roadway improvements. The area
of focus for the improvements is the neighborhood located south of Lewis Street,
North of "A" Street between Wehe and Cedar. The Virgie Robinson Elementary
School is in this neighborhood and low income students and families would
experience safety benefit from the sidewalks and other improvements.
- 4 -
REGULAR MEETING JULY 17, 2008
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
NEW BUSINESS:
A. CDBG 2009 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program Allocations and Annual 'Work
Plan (Project Presentations) (MF# CDBG 08-002)
Chairman Samuel made some introductory comments and asked staff for a
report.
Dave McDonald, City Planner, explained this item was before the Planning
Commission last month and that Federal Regulations require two public
hearings. Applicants had been notified of the meeting and invited to attend,
none were present at tonight's meeting. Angie Pitman, Community Development
Block Grant Administrator provided a brief overview of the CDBG program and
explained the city would be receiving about $600,000 in CDBG funds for 2009.
In addition there would be approximately $10,000 in program income and
$226,175 available from reallocation of prior year activities. For 2009 the City
will have an estimated total of $876,175 for project activities. Thirteen (13)
proposals were received totaling $921,000. Twelve projects were presented at the
last meeting, one application was withdrawn. Staff recommendations for funding
12 projects totaling $851,176 is provided in the staff report. Remaining funds
were would be reprogrammed for 2008 activities in a amendment to the 2008
Annual Action Plan to be discussed later in the meeting.
Chairman Samuel opened the hearing for public comment, after three calls, the
public hearing was closed and the Planning Commission commenced
discussion.
Commissioner Hay moved the Planning Commission recommend the City
Council approve the use of funds for the 2009 Community Development Block
Grant Program Year as set forth in the "2009 CDBG Fund Summary."
Commissioner Kempf seconded, motion carried unanimously.
- 1 -
Exhibit C
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION approving the Program Year 2009 Community Development Block
Grant Allocations and Annual Work Plan.
WHEREAS, staff has prepared the Program Year 2009 Annual Work Plan for activities
totaling$851,175; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Pasco City Council hereby approves the Annual Work Plan as
follows:
Loc
ID Activity Funding
1. Program Administration $110,000.00
2. Civic Center -Youth Recreation Specialist $30,000.00
3. Martin Luther King Community Center Recreation Specialist $30,000.00
4. Senior Citizen's Center Recreation Specialist $20,000.00
5. Pasco Downtown Development Commercial Kitchen $65,000.00
6. Downtown Fagade Improvement(4 facades) $80,000.00
7. Catholic Family Volunteer Chore Services (4) $4,000.00
8. Energy Efficient Home Program (10 households) $20,000.00
9. Tri-County Partners Habitat for Humanity(12 households) 0.00
Boys & Girls Club - Program Space Expansion, Safety
10. Enhancement $50,000.00
Martin Luther King Community Center- South End Gym
11. Remodel $100,000.00
12. Code Enforcement Officer $48,000.00
13. Sidewalks - East Pasco $294,175.00
TOTAL $851,175.00
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr
Deputy City Clerk City Attorney
AGENDA REPORT NO. 29
FOR: City Council July 30,2008
TO: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager
Robert Albe c Works Director
FROM: Michael McS\\h`` ity Engineer Regular Mtg.: 08/04/08
SUBJECT: Award Reconstruction of Alley Approaches - 2008 Phase 2 Project, #07-3-04
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Bid Summary
2. Vicinity Map
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
08/04: MOTION: I move to award the low bid for the Reconstruction of Alley
Approaches - 2008 Phase 2 Project, #07-3-04 to Scott's Excavating
Tri-Cities, LLC, in the amount of $49,738.00, and further,
authorize the Mayor to sign the contract documents.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
City Street Fund
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) On July 30, 2008, staff received three (3) bids for the Reconstruction of Alley
Approaches - 2008 Phase 2 Project, #07-3-04. The low bid, was received from
Scott's Excavating Tri-Cities, LLC in the amount of$49,738.00. The second bid
received was in the amount of $62,025.00. The Engineer's Estimate for the
project is $54,486.00.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) established a yearly program to
repair the alley approaches in the older parts of the City. The program is now in its
second year of a three year program. The goal is to improve as many locations as
possible within the budget and target area. Where applicable, additional
approaches will be replaced to meet the goals of the program.
Staff recommends award of this contract to Scott's Excavating Tri-Cities, LLC.
10(a)
City of Pasco
Reconstruction of Alley Approaches-2008
Phase II
Project No. 07-3-04
Bid Opening Date
July 30, 2008
BID SUMMARY
Total
1. Scott's Excavating Tri-Cities, LLC $49,738.00
2. A&B Asphalt, Inc. $621025.00
3. Inland Asphalt Company $795687.50
't .F
of `yf
t ,^, ' fir lyk - ifii�. •��'R:' >'�-
•.0 r F• �
4' iyt � i4 i.+ g r Ira,t
GOD
i y""t:si�'.��'°L,�o-rif..-• r'�J3 iyal i ..1 A SYr' +�t�;�� �����
t
■r \ `:t �s ,. - ;JY, slot
t` � tilt's*l -'f*,��'�, r1. ,y�'- ,, •I�� o- , r 1 .•t 'M
AM
�r Y 1 i t°•t
• � '�°' -�, �„ x. .^µ ff.'s i��,; �`t
t[1 rl bt. L 4 o °{� Ris h~ I}- � ! j �'ri ti.iF•11
t i 0..
ato
IL
""'+•. t 1t .+ .�t :tit t.'='f s `t.
7774 'C`� �i r•t•;F.T Y`.., f•S.i
t. s l:ll'to
�"• �.. s'• $�,..'. f 4i, �� t, .y� _ Fly .• +�'.p
1, �• ,iy"f J'� rl �t �T.. � "'fit 3
ir•_i4••'i�'':. .� + .a¢.rf.:3$:,a.Tlk{r.A 1i iw. .�'!:a _ 'A�Jr.-:-t,.5'�t'^. J`'Sf.• i• .f�:: -- tp
AGENDA REPORT NO. 39
FOR: City Council July 30, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager Regular Mtg.: 8/4108
Rick White, Director f-1
Community & Economic Development
FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner-- —
SUBJECT: Right-of-Way Dedication for Power Line(MF4 INFO08-083)
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Vicinity Map
2. Right-of-Way Dedication Deed
1Q. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to accept the deed from Kenneth Smith for a portion of
the Power Line Road Right-of-Way.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
A. NONE
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. The owner of the property adjacent the intersection of Road 52 and Power Line Road is
in the process of designing and constructing street improvements for Road 52 between
Sandifur Parkway and Power Line Road.
B. The proposed street improvements will cause Road 52 to be elevated about 10 feet above
the surrounding grade near the intersection with Power Line Road. The proposed right-
of-way is needed to accommodate the planned street construction.
10(b)
{r..� _ try. ��`+"+.pp^}�,,p,•.,: -.}
'.�••�.•.� yam. ._ •'I / '.f.�lfc.` a^r.t� / •. •1' 4:
e�.r+r i .t _ 4 .Jw.•.
6� •�,
APW
Ak
Lin
Mm
� as
! j
Im
NN
3
•
I' ili
.t
k
• rY ^k X
After Recordine,Return To:
City of Pasco, Washington
Attn: City Planner
525 North 3r'
Pasco, WA 99301
DEDICATION DEED
Tax Parcel No. 114-250-015
THE GRANTOR(S), P/' by donation pursuant to RCW
35A.79.010,dedicates,conveys d quit claims to the G TEE,THE CITY OF PASCO,a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington,for the public use,as a public right-of-way,all
interest in the land described as follows:
The south 30 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2,Township 9 North, Range 29
East, W.M.,Franklin County Washington
DATED this g day of U Iq 2008.
GRANTOR(S) !
STATE OF WASHINGTON , )
ss.
County of Franklin )� l
On this day of 2008, before me,the undersigned,duly to be
the individuals)described above and who executed the within and foregoing instrument as an
agent of the owner(s) of record, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they signed the same as
his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed,for res and rposes therein mentioned,and on
commissioned and sworn, personally appeared i 161 to me known oath
stated that he/she/they is/are authorized to execute the sai ��-str-uw-t-
GIVEN under by hand and official seal this JL day of
200�iur+r�h�i
.` t,p�lec#� ft 1
�ypT AR Y Print Name:
.-a— NOTARY PU'I§ILX in and for the State of Washington
PUBt1C Residing at: Gd SL Z'
26,ION My Commission Expires: i 4e — /
o
i����9 4'0
'+ ',lN\G\���
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Counciln August 1, 2008
FROM: Gary Crutch Manager Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
SUBJECT: Car Allowanc Adjustment
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Unleaded Fuel Prices—Washington, 1/05 -- 7/08
2. IRS Mileage Reimbursement Rate, 2/05—7/08
3. Car Allowance Positions/Amounts
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
8/4: MOTION: I move to increase authorized car allowances by 40%, retroactive to
January 1, 2008.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
See below.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Since about 1980, the city has provided car allowances to certain positions in lieu
of providing city administrative vehicles. The car allowance system has always
been much more cost effective than owning, insuring, maintaining, operating and
fueling a dozen or more cars. Car allowances are currently provided to 18
positions, representing a total annual expense of about $51,000.
B) The car allowances were last updated in January 2005 as part of the adopted
budget. Since that time, however, fuel prices have increased markedly (see
Exhibit 1). The federally-approved mileage reimbursement rate, which considers
the full cost of vehicle ownership and operation, has increased from 40.5¢ per
mile in 2005 to 58.5¢ per mile as of July 2008 (see Exhibit 2). The change
reflects an increase of 44% over the past 3.5 years.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) At current (budgeted) rates, it costs the city at least $550 per month to own,
operate and insure an administrative vehicle. To have the same service level
(mobility) as that available via car allowance, the city would need to provide at
least 15 administrative vehicles, representing a total annual cost of at least
$100,000.
B) Given the IRS mileage rate change over the past three years, the car allowance
schedule should be increased by a factor of 45%. Even after such an increase, the
annual cost (about $75,000) will still represent a savings of at least $25,000
annually and the car allowance will sustain the better service level (mobility), as
each of the positions will continue to have the mobility they need when they need
it.
C) In view of the fact that those positions with a car allowance have absorbed the
extraordinary cost increases over the past three years (especially since February
2007), it is recommended that the adjustment be retroactive to January 2008.
10(c)
LO 00,/�
Q
ri
NCO
F No �O?
�Llp
CV) CPO,
t N
i <O
i � N �O
moo,
ti
C
[ oo a0s
N 0) 10,E
N
M
N I N �Q✓�
I `ol
C14 N /�
•� co 00.
O
IL 190,o�
T
•� N
-QO,
G � ��
N
m 90?
LF)
N z `gol
CD LO
`90,
CV
C� SOS
oy
N M
I N 190,
sO
,fin
V:
N
04
19,
0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 o
C) LO o LO o Un o LO o o
6 4 -;Y M M N N T T Q p
Ef} ER fi{} b4 64 09 (f} bF3 d} 6R} Ef3
uolleE) aad 001-ld
i
o
OD
y` LO t iS.Fs�' r�i 3ixit'ii f1{ 3 : Ssi£ t Iwss j 1 s..
O
1 t�s'csr y £y t£+,Z�'�i6 a a x } r a 'a .+ 'rs'.s
lit,1 Q �` i " 3' s�+' 3 t^. y F i D"�..2.''z5,x'rS
t .;... .{tea i:....5; :.. �...... 3' �'F�a:e: .;7•... . a.; :.R sr F :,..:,! .5.�._<:.wx:,_,.F
N
OLc) a F yea s' ids s°iY{' £` �.s"1 tEre 'h#sN 3 �aL LC y: ^..aerv'�i'.�., Q
i £ '�,Y'� x{a 3"L tti a�f { .zc-.c,-` a..3, N
ti},t333:i$"sss�3sih {j-�' �j f �s ...:a
W
/�� "a�s� "_s%:,::.'ii:•'r: :s.te•`rx�'34::�•:;^; ..»>�'t;xN�;-':cN:�.;rS •iiiic5'ir_;iXaa�"i
W
LO £a i a a�a pax5,>. 'gz}a;N: :S ;e:�'s'i'e _ i'iir's:i i•'+rw;Ss?iF� IV O
06 !a:{3i{Y 3.y, S S t aC sf'.�d' S>�^' ,[�.i�715 II -•"^L«^d'S1i P
^' � � ����,r vt r-v Y�' .5'a-�•�5..:r�'e �'�y^' °{.# i'2��#•s F �c.��^�*�i�
L
i
CD
L(1 ;;y•vs:•�';#.a{ r '`�?r..` sx: �ic•°j.?r ii��__ ;i i i -r i.' *'''f §{�r o
`V
�' :.:iiii3;i�.+.����{•�.,..e' )�} a�+l�'�mss t{.s;s�,�t'"s-r"'s.5 .�'�{�,�
a•s:aEs.:..,i..L>.• .aTf.!:..{�•!rR{g Y `i`.si {°G«.�.t.: ;,iv 4 �'Ts-,
m
cc f
L
{o :,.._.r.... ...
Lo : .....yx ia?i•.:u::q,rcvi:3ia: tt '�«iii-z .£..�,�^>isisyi;iaaG:iifisii:^iiiiili9i. t':�,;;c
'i,: -c'x dssrl• �' ii •1'iitiii�r' •„;.s. ifi:Sy-tx3i i'u} t i J o
a L �•a..i�1 1 .Y..' )"�`Sa�•.'4'w".v�i. :j�9t}�,i1�, i��`'� )�'� }l �a 4..t '�5
ii•8 YN'P a�t�„sjx' 'Y„ ;'a°r'�.Y''-0fjr'k' n i• kk 3'{ .3 std {it }„t !
J }."`;: ij5 •L ^�iii.2'r- § c. Saar f r �: Q
?i%
L .£�s .;"rsnr!��a=:��t:i's .....s t?..^ ^a 'S:x
U)
I
LO
s••'r'''^yi`i'isRCbi„r;'
iii;::::: i:'?+�-r.s<'� :..,:eE;, swF?=�r�.,f 6�3�;;>•<i:= i=���F,
� :iN;i'n'z:�... �^,�iia:s�,(.�.tr.: y���fy'.�".._•��: .ti'`'��•s�{';
........... -�`
LL
CD i
CAD O m O O
LL
aliw aad s;uaC
Car Allowance
DEPART` d4B .'' AT ,tWATE
A&CS Administrative& Community Services $280
Director
Finance Manager $160
Accounting Supervisor $75
Information Services Manager $140
Facilities Manager $350
Customer Service/Utility Billing Manager $75
Information Services Specialist $85
C&ED Community& Economic Development $350
Director
Senior Planner $260
Executive City Manager $350
Personnel Manager $120
Fire Fire Chief $350
Muni Court Court Administrator $75
Police Police Chief $350
PW/E Public Works Director $350
City Engineer $300
Plant Division Manager $280
Field Division Manager $350
AGENDA REPORT NO. 36
FOR: City Council DATE: 7/30/08
TO: Gary Crutchfie anager WORKSHOP:
Rick White, Di ecto Q V4 REGULAR: 8/4/08
Community an Economic Development
FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a School at 3309 Road100 (Kingspoint
Christian School) (MF# SP08-005)
I. REFERENCE(S):
A. Report to Planning Commission
B. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 6/19/08 & 7/17/08
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve the special permit for the Kingspoint Christian School
to be located in the 3300 block of Road 100, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
III. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On June 17, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine
whether or not to recommend a special permit for the location of a school at 3309 Road 100.
B. Following conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that with
conditions, it would be appropriate to recommend approval of a special permit the location
of a school at 3212 3309 Road 100. The recommended conditions are contained in the
attached Planning Commission report.
C. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received.
io(a)
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-005 APPLICANT: Kingspoint Christian
HEARING DATE: 6/ 19/08 School
ACTION DATE: 7/ 17/08 3309 Rd 100
Pasco, WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a School & School Master Plan.
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Lam: The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the West 1/4 of Section 17,
Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M., except the west 30 feet thereof.
General Location: 3309 Rd 100
Property Size: 12 acres
2. ACCESS: The site has access from Road 100.
3. UTILITIES: Water and sewer are available to the site.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-S-12
(Suburban Residential) and contains a small farm that is in a fallow
state. The property to the east is in the county and is zoned R-S-20
(Suburban Residential) and contains a vineyard. Property to the south is
zone R-S-12 and is partially developed with a church. The properties to
the west are zoned R-S-1 and R-S-20 and are developed with single-
family homes.
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Plan goal OF-5 suggests provisions should be
made for educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: A Determination of Non-
significance (DNS) has been issued for this proposal in accordance with
the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter
43.21(c) RCW.
ANALYSIS
The Kingspoint Christian School, originally Faith Christian Academy,
purchased the site in question in 2000. The property was in the County at that
1
time. Prior to the purchase of the property the school applied for and received
a special permit from the County for the location of a school on the site. In
2005 the school sold the south 6 acres of their land to a church. The church,
Desert Springs Covenant Church, received a special permit from the City to
construct their church in 2003. The church has since been built.
As a result of the land sale, the significant lapse in time since County approval
of a special permit, and the fact the school development plans have changed, a
new application is required.
The Kingspoint Christian School plan identifies a three-phase project with
construction on the first phase to begin in the fall of 2008. The first phase will
consist of classrooms and supporting facilities (offices etc). Phase two will add
more classrooms and support facilities. Phase three will include a gymnasium
and classrooms. Other improvement on the site will include a parking lot to be
built in phases and sports fields. The completed school will be capable of
housing 350 students from kindergarten through grade 12.
Schools and educational facilities have been permitted in a variety of zoning
districts within the community; however they require review through the
special permit process prior to issuance of a building permit. Special permits
have been issued for a number of new public schools, the community college,
and Tri-Cities Prep in the last few years. This has all been in response to the
growth in the city's population. As the community continues to grow there will
be a need to add more school classrooms. Because of funding allocations and
fluctuations in enrollments, school construction projects tend to be mutli-year
efforts that continue over time. While the County special permit was opened
ended with respect to a time frame for development, the city typically specifies
a time for completion or obtaining a building permit. In the recent past CBC,
the Pasco School District, and Tri-Cities Prep have all submitted long range (10
years) Plans for various expansion projects. The proposed school is anticipated
to be built in three phase over several years. The school is therefore seeking a
multi-year approval. Approving a multi-year Master Plan eliminates the need
for multiple special permit reviews for individual expansion projects. It
simplifies the development process and enables schools to quickly move
forward on projects as funding becomes available.
INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report.
The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the
result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record
hearing.
2
1) The Kingspoint School site is zoned R-S-12;
2) The site contains about 12 acres.
3) The Kingspopint School group has owned the site since 2000;
4) Franklin County approved a special permit for a larger school project in
2000.
5) Comprehensive Plan goal OF-5 suggests provisions should be made for
educational facilities throughout the Urban Growth Area;
6) Population in Benton and Franklin Counties has grown by 53,000 in the
last 10 years;
7) The City of Pasco has doubled in population since 1997;
8) Population growth has created a demand for additional educational
facilities;
9) The site is located on an arterial street.
10) Water and sewer is available to the site.
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows:
I) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives
and text of the Comprehensive Plan?
Comprehensive Plan Goal OF-5 encourages educational facilities to be
located throughout the Urban Growth Area.
2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
Sewer and water service is available in Road 100. The school will be
required to connect to those utilities and contribute its fair share to
the cost of the utilities through payment of connection fees.
3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained, and operated to be in
harmony with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity?
Schools are typically located in or near residential neighborhoods.
Schools and supporting facilities, (parking lots, sports fields, portable
classrooms, & storage buildings) are an accepted part of the character
of neighborhoods.
4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design
discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general
vicinity or impair the value thereof?
3
The location and development of school properties on other sites
within Pasco have not impaired the value of surrounding properties.
Houses in the R-S-12 zone may be built to a height of 35 feet.
5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable
to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, dust, traffic, or
flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within
the district?
The operations of schools generally throughout Pasco do not create
objectionable conditions for neighboring properties.
6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and
developed where proposed, or in any way become a nuisance to uses
permitted in the district?
The proposed Master Plan identifies future buildings, parking lots, and
sports fields that will be constructed to meet building codes that ensure
public health and safety are met. School properties in Pasco have not
been a source of complaints or the development of nuisance conditions.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact
and conclusions as contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report.
MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning
Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the
Kingspoint Christian School for the location and development of a school
in the 3000 block of Road 100 with conditions as contained in the July
17, 2007 staff report:
Approval Conditions
1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
2) Development of the Kingspoint Christian School shall substantially
conform to the campus Master Plan submitted with the special
permit application;
3) The Kingspoint Christian School shall dedicate the west 10 feet of
the parcel for the Road 100 right-of-way as a condition of permit
approval;
4) All right-of-way improvements including but not limited to curb,
gutter, street construction, sidewalks, storm drainage, street lights
undergrounding overhead power lines, fire hydrants and utility
4
services shall be constructed to meet the requirements and
specifications of the City of Pasco;
5) The parking lot must be set back a minimum of 25 feet from the
Road 100 right-of-way;
6) The parking lot must be hard surfaced and landscaped per Pasco
Municipal Code 25.75.070 but, in no case shall the landscaping be
less than what is shown on the master site plan;
7) The school building including the gymnasium shall be constructed
to meet the standards of the 1-182 Overlay District (PMC 25.58);
8) Storage buildings, sheds, concession stands and similar structures
can not include container storage as defined in PMC 25.12.430;
9) The north and east property line must be fenced. The required
fencing must be 6 feet high and must be sight obscuring;
10) The west property line north of the parking lot must be fenced but
is not require to be sight obscuring;
11) The soccer field must be set back from the north property line at
least 25 feet;
12) No sports field lighting is permitted;
13) The granting of a Special Permit does not give blanket approval to
driveway locations and types of driveways. All driveways must be
reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department prior to
construction.
14) The Kingspoint Christian School shall pay the code required traffic
impact fee in conjunction with building permits for each phase of
development;
15) The special permit shall be valid until August 31, 2018 provided a
building permit has been issued for the first phase within 3 years
of the date of the special permit approval. The special permit will
become null and void if a building permit has not been issued by
August 31, 2011.
5
•
{
�l
k . �.
K.
�y •.S
.���+.E'�,•wYYN..iI!'.+• } � .'3,W..'-. `�� xr"L.'1k.�k: J• L iV
All
RLM
Sk
im
.�tr,s k `A;try•,�:• �,t•M. '� �� .. ""°i5, s:+^` �.-iiyyy.:'..�;,':Fw
�t� Ed`s "de, "�• .. . _�,}.
'Y i':�•'�W - :-vim,:
r `F�y�.a�+.{'�,:.,ir'�;1: ;',�:,k§y4�k.`.'4'e..a;:i`#o-*,e,'&�a.<�.*a;+�. ;.�. :. s`�'•�'s'.Vii'.
���. F''/"' �' 1 4'�C.��i?:..,w '4 -i.Ta,:r��i�•c��e .�� _ '�t Yom` '. _ -.
� � fir^+�.i:-;� i,.w'L.•£:-i.::rA7.�^.*.^,sC3"...:� `Wt��%:." �i'- _ -.a-- �.. "r'.*yq'°" .a.�,�i �,. +
' 51 : �-
✓ :. a
ip
a �
0
1 1 283
ui
Z L
07 ui
U Q �
V 4.. UL
� . Cl) �.-
• .�
LL
z
Z
W
4o c�
• litui� �M Q
o U
� • o Cl)
LM
Ft
ct o VO4--
U . .
a■J �Q�' 0� 5
LL
N�3W3o �
a �
0
w - 13 N3
LU
Lon
W
LLI
J
U �
0
!w! !o 4!w!l A;!C a
Cld 00
U • •
� C
Cf3 r
*pow
N N,�
woo ��
TE
I ij I Z m
I �
I i , I lit
461 � V li I ■� �
I V •� I
� II
II
it
hi1 AD Rt
1 , I
I � 3
0
0
�ZWOOJS*�lj> s I
i
a�n n L as
—s
6emonII.lp,ra I I
a.ngn3 '
k
k I
i L-, 3 i I
3 f
Ell
I 111 ! Illkll k s ; �
I I k iIs j i �
I I Im I f
i;
.-
! LE N 0
� o
j , Q 6)
r
qn N N 0 C
I I Ql 3 a
i i t -7 CL Q
I� � i •� I II i i I
a
I
i
it
----- I CL Q C CO)
"----------------- - -'-----------------._-_-_-----._-i-_-_-/-461_- 1.06
I
Planning Commission Minutes
6/19/08
E. Special Permit Kingspoint Christian School Master Plan
(Georgia Perkins)(3309 Rd 100)(MF#08-005)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments.
Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to
surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed site. The application
was for a private school. The county previously granted a special permit for a the
school on the proposed site but due to the length of time since that approval and
given the fact the scope of the project has changed a new special permit is
needed. Staff reviewed the written report for the benefit of the Planning
Commission and explained the proposed site plan.
Chairman Samuel opened the hearing for public comment.
Bill McCue, 2211 S. Highlands Blvd, South Richland, stated he was the
architect for this project and then proceeded to view the three phase plan
containing the parking lot, classroom wings, gymnasium and playfields.
Chairman Samuel asked Mr. McCue the number of students intended for Phase
1.
Mr. McCue stated for Phase 1 there will be 100 students, with the Master Plan
projecting a total of 200 students.
Tim Casnick, 10104 Willow Way, stated he has lived in the area for 10 years and
is concerned with the increased traffic this school will create. He commented
about the current speed limit of 35 mph and was concerned about student
safety. He questioned if there would be enough room for a turn lane.
Georgia Perkins, Principal for Kingspoint Christian School, 5007 Richardson
Road, commented on the driveway and stated they have a contract allowing Mrs.
Olson to reside at the residence until her death and at that time the house will
be leveled and the land added to the playground.
Tim Casnick asked about the lighting situation with the playfields.
Chairman Samuel clarified Tim Casnick was not opposed to the school but
concerned with the future plans.
With no further comments, Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing.
Staff stated the special permit granted by the county contained a number of
conditions including improvements to Road 100 with curb, gutter and sidewalk
additions for safety for the children. A fence with screen was required by the
County. Similar conditions would be needed for this application.
Chairman Samuel referenced the light study performed at the Tri-City Prep to be
guidance for the recommendation for lighting issues.
Staff suggested the applicant move the soccer farther to the south to prevent
balls from going over the fence.
The applicant had no objection.
Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Little, to close the
hearing on a proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoptions of
findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the
July 17, 2008 meeting. The motion was approved unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes
7/17/08
D. Special Permit Kin s oint Christian School Master Plan
(Georgia Perkins 3309 Rd 100 MF#SPO8-005
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments.
Staff stated this item was presented last month at the public hearing. Staff
provided a list of recommended conditions for approval of the special permit.
The applicant received a copy of the recommended conditions and spoke briefly
with staff prior to the Planning Commission meeting. There was one concern
expressed over condition # 12 related sports field lighting. The restriction on
sports field lighting did not preclude lighting for night security.
Chairman Samuel asked about the lighting standards and comparison to Tri-
City Prep High School.
Staff commented the lighting study and conditions for the Prep school was tied
to Chapel Hill Blvd. This facility does not have an area to allow for such
separation.
Commissioner Cruz stated that Tri-City Prep High School has a fair distance
between apartments and homes.
Commissioner Schouviller asked what the applicants' response was.
Staff stated the applicant was concerned with safety lighting and want security
night lighting. In the future, if there was ever a for sports lighting the applicant
could apply for a special permit.
Commissioner Rose questioned the landscaping requirements.
Staff stated this project is being developed in three stages and will meet the
requirements for landscaping.
Commissioner Kempf questioned if the issue with Willow Way has been
addressed.
Staff noted it was covered in condition #13.
Commissioner Little moved seconded by Commissioner Rose the Planning
Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the
July 17, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved unanimously.
Commissioner Little moved based on the findings of fact as adopted Seconded by
Commissioner Schouviller, the Planning Commission recommend the City
Council grant a special permit to Kingspoint Christian School for the location
and development of a school in the 3000 block of Road 100 with conditions as
contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved
unanimously.
Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the
first regular meeting in August, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would
cause a closed record hearing to be held before the City Council.
AGENDA REPORT NO. 37
FOR: City Council July 30, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfie Manager Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
Rick White, Di ctor
Community & conomic Development
FROM: David I. McDonald, City PlannerjRl�
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT: County House Parking Lot at 1016 N. 4`h Avenue (Franklin
County) (MF# SP08-006)
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Report to the Planning Commission
2. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 6/19/08 & 7/17/08
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve the special permit for the Franklin County
Courthouse parking lot at 1016 N. 4ch Avenue, as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
A. NONE
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. ' On June 17, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine
whether or not to recommend a special permit for the redevelopment of the Franklin
County Courthouse Parking lot.
B. Following a conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that with
conditions, it would be appropriate to recommend approval of a special permit for the
Franklin County Courthouse parking lot. The recommended conditions are contained in
the attached Planning Commission report.
C. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received.
10(e)
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-006 APPLICANT: Franklin County
HEARING DATE: 6/ 19/08 1016 N. 4th Avenue
ACTION DATE: 7/ 17/08 Pasco WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a parking lot on the Franklin
County Courthouse property at 1016 N 41h Ave.
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: Blocks 6 and 7 Sylvester Park Addition together with
adjacent vacated rights-of-way.
General Location: 1016 North Fourth Avenue (Franklin County
Courthouse Facility)
Property Size: 5.6 acres
2. ACCESS: The site has access from North 4th Ave. and N 5th Ave.
3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the property.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 (Low
Density Residential) and developed with the Franklin County
Courthouse Complex. Properties to the north (Atomic Foods) and
south (Medical and Law Offices) are zoned C-1 (Retail Business).
Volunteer Park is located to the east and single family residential
homes are located to the west. The park and the homes to the west
are zoned R-1.
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates
this site as an area for governmental activities. Comprehensive
Plan goal OF-3 encourages the provision of lands for public
facilities.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been
issued a determination of non-significance in accordance with
review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter
43.21(c) RCW.
1
7. HISTORY: The original Franklin County Courthouse was built on
Block 6 of Sylvester Park Addition in 1912. Over the years other
facilities have been added to or adjacent the Courthouse. In 2004
an addition to the jail was added to the northwest side of the
Courthouse Complex. That was followed by the location of
temporary offices and a complete renovation of the 1912 portion of
the building during 2005 and 2006. Landscaping and fencing
improvements have recently been completed.
ANALYSIS
The Franklin County Courthouse complex has existed in one form or
another at 1016 North Fourth Avenue for almost 100 years. As the
Community has grown the Courthouse facilities have also grown. Over
the years court rooms and jail facilities have expanded to provide for the
increased population. Within the last few years the 1912 portion of the
Courthouse was completely remodeled and upgraded. As the public
usage of the Courthouse facilities has increased, the availability of
parking around the Courthouse has become an issue.
To address parking needs for the Courthouse the County has submitted
a special permit application for a new parking lot fronting 4th Ave. The
plan calls for the demolition of the vacant Health Department building
and major site grading to eliminate the elevation difference between the
existing parking areas and the land where the Health building is located.
The new parking lot will occupy 50,360 square feet (1.15 acres),
providing 131 parking stalls. There will be a net gain of 90 parking
spaces with the new parking lot. Eight thousand four hundred square
feet will be devoted to landscaping. The landscaping will primarily front
4th Ave.
Government and quasi-governmental activities are defined as a
"Community Service Facility 1" and has such, require review through the
special permit process before locating within the community.
In reviewing special permit applications the Planning Commission is to
be guided by the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060 as listed below in the
findings of fact section.
INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff
report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this
2
listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during
the open record hearing.
1. The Franklin County Courthouse property is zoned R-1
2. Governmental facilities are defined as Community Service Facilities
3. Community Service Facilities are unclassified uses.
4. Unclassified uses are required to pass through the special permit
review process.
5. The proposed parking lot is located at 1016 N. 4th Avenue.
6. The site is currently developed with the vacant Health District
Office.
7. The proposed parking lot will contain 131 parking spaces.
8. The new parking lot will provide 90 additional parking spaces over
and above the current parking on site.
9. 8,472 square feet of landscaping will be provided with the new
parking lot.
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF
FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its
conclusion based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The
criteria are as follows:
1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies,
objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan?
The site and proposed activity is consistent with Comprehensive Plan
Goal LF-3, which encourages the provision of adequate lands for
public facilities.
2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
Demands on existing infrastructure will be minimal due to the fact
that the proposed parking lot does not need most public utilities. The
proposed parking lot will reduce congestion on the surrounding
public streets by providing additional on-site parking.
3
3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated
to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the
general vicinity?
The proposed parking lot will complement the existing Courthouse
Development and general character of the property to the north.
4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site
design discourage the development of permitted uses on property
in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof•
The site and surrounding properties are fully developed. The parking
lot will not have any impact on the surrounding properties with
respect to height. The parking lot will make room for more on-site
parking thereby reducing off-site parking near other businesses.
5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more
objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes
vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the
operation of any permitted uses within the district?
The addition of 90 new parking spaces will benefit the surrounding
neighborhood by providing additional on-site parking.
6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if
located and developed where proposed, or in anyway will become
a nuisance to uses permitted in the district?
The proposed parking lot will aid in removing on-street parking in the
general neighborhood and will enable visitors to the Courthouse to
have a safe on-site location for parking.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of
Fact and conclusions as contained in the July 17, 2008 staff
report.
MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the
Planning Commission recommend the City Council grant a special
permit to Franklin County for the location and development of a
new parking lot at 1016 N. 4th Avenue with conditions as contained
in the July 17, 2007 staff report:
4
Approval Conditions
1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
2) The proposed parking lot shall be developed in substantial
conformance with the site plan submitted with the
application;
3) The County and/or the County's contractor shall protect 4th
Avenue at all times during the demotion and construction,
preventing debris from entering the public right-of-way;
4) A traffic and pedestrian control and safety plan must be
submitted to and approved by the City Engineering Office
prior to the start of demolition/construction;
5) All water service and sewer lines shall be disconnect
following the standards and procedures of the Public Works
Department;
6) All sidewalk and curb and gutter currently damaged or that
may be damaged during demolition/construction must be
replaced to current City Standards and Specifications;
7) The parking lot must be landscaped per Pasco Municipal
Code Section 25.75.070;
8) The special permit shall be null and void if a building permit
has not been obtained by August 31, 2009.
5
ybay.•
' :'�j - of 5.- ..1 �¢ y r+"• �"F�,�"�.
*. a
cv, - a
62 g
tnK
so
_
... ,r.e•..... -
i
�•^ ...::ter
s
��.�'44rA%'��' _ \ i.CL � mod.-`f*•+bit`h � � / � k l.�r
. at. `yam
I �.�" r0 :ietlSTa•«' �� �� acre - `t a... 4 1.�, '`w7' S {
.t h
Rp
If
AWL
At
OWN;
• f-1
Lu
IPA'fi"'a'`pF_ f any - _i I-'7Y .. .'S .`•j �,.
S l_.-M'-1 .• WN _—
NAE
ZN ■�
UL
E
o R o
LM
CL
, moo
+, and W1lr
• W..4 E
4.� U)
v~, N m
Ile
w ■ a
OC
2ND PvE
Wo
TOM
U
M �
�N
� � o PEE ti0
c
0
� u
and HIV
W
Irma
• ,� o V
V • •
� Ct
� U
cn N W CO)
W Y
= Q p-
O �
O
N
Ig1QiiYM GOYW 3vmw$U1 Od NLhM NM
"" a"" `w• °�:� �S
NOLLVVIHOd 8W3NVTGOSA V
101 DMINd M3! HV, u
NOLU-K W30 SNO"M AllMO NnlNVVEW X30N INVId 3115 3AOMOO �
133819 3Atl1C0 i—- - -
I ITIT,�
!
1 I.
U-
I o
d
— 4
I
I
I a . ooao
0 {I
LU
00000 0000
a r is
I Z
c J
CL
r . ~
LL � rr w
LL
p o
� U
W
�
-j o o � CO
zo
o U-
❑r a
' a �
I
w
co
co
El
, a
0
w
LL
(�J
O Og
– - - - -—- - -— t3383s 138v0avw — — --- ---- ---
133dIS 3AVIOO M
+s�H •F If •FrYdl�S711Lt.F�i t{) OR
77
II r
.► f: .fir
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
�•�� ��I
. ,o-a. . � —a-,a .ta � .►•n • ,r ,k,a� .�sr'. .
o .rae mfg y
- -
. . .. .. T
.. yp W Z
- p z
k. •��ODOQD _ y
� ':'fir-,• fir_,_ .� . :,�::: --a - - -i i
OK� fie
r
- -
Lu
oa
�K mF
x^a"S�ii I
AIM 3AVIDO
Y.
Ffl111 .9 t%3 _
w •'r�• .p t� •i.
- .
TF FIT
Lo
Zj
LLJ
CL
••• �4- � � i2 X 1e 8�
1
H _ S
Coe f
cm
Q
j
a. a�
Planning Commission Minutes
6/19/08
F. Special Permit Franklin County Courthouse Parking Lot
Franklin Count 1016 N. 4th Ave MF#08-006
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments.
Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to
surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed site. This location
currently has the old Benton-Franklin County Health Department building on
site and it will be demolished to accommodate a parking lot providing 90
additional parking spaces. The Franklin County Courthouse and Jail are in need
of additional parking. The surrounding properties are zoned R-1, Commercial,
which include Volunteer Park and a mobile home park.
Chairman asked if on-street parking would still be permitted.
Staff responded it would be permitted.
Chris' Giles, 514 N. Nevada Street, Kennewick, represented the County and
spoke in favor of the special permit. He explained the plan calls for the
demolition of the old Health District building, extensive site grading and then
construction of the new parking lot. The county plans on completing the parking
lot this year. The parking lot is to be lit and will have camera surveillance for the
protection of the public.
Chairman opened the hearing for public comment.
Michelle Kellogg, Employee from Lourdes Medical Facility, 514 N. Nevada Street,
Kennewick stated they are very happy to see the proposed parking lot being
built. Due to the lack of parking in the area, the hospital parking lot has been
crowed and it made has made it difficult for patients to find parking.
Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, to close the
hearing on a proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoptions of
findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the
July 17, 2008 meeting. The motion passed unanimously.
Welcome to Jana Kempf, the newest Planning Commissioner!
Commissioner Rose moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, that the
meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes
7/17/08
E. Special Permit Franklin County Courthouse Parkin Lot
(Franklin County)(1016 N. 4th Ave)(MF#SP08-
006!
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments.
Staff stated this item was presented last month at the public hearing. Staff
provided a list of recommended conditions for approval of the special permit.
Commissioner Hay moved seconded by Commissioner Little the Planning
Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the
July 17, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved unanimously.
Commissioner Hay moved based on the findings of fact as adopted seconded by
Commissioner Schouviller, the Planning Commission recommend the City
Council grant a special permit to Franklin County for the location and
development of a new parking lot at 1016 N. 4th Avenue with conditions as
contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved
unanimously.
Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the
first regular meeting in August, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would
cause a closed record hearing to be held before the City Council.
AGENDA REPORT NO. 35
FOR: City Council July 30, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfi i Manager Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
Rick White, Di e o fZ114
Community & conomic Development
FROM: David 1. McDonald, City Planne
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church at 216 N. 1 lth Ave. (Iglesia Bautista
El Calvario) (MF# SP08-004)
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Report to the Planning Commission
2. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 6/19/08 & 7/17/08
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve the special permit for the Iglesia Bautista El
Calvario at 216 N. 11th Avenue, as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
A. NONE
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On June 17, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine
whether or not to recommend a special permit for the location of a church at 216 N. 11th
Avenue.
B. Following conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that with
conditions, it would be appropriate to recommend approval of a special permit for the
location of a church at 216 N. 11th Avenue. The recommended conditions are contained
in the attached Planning Commission report.
C. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received.
io(f)
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-004 APPLICANT: Iglesia Bautista
HEARING DATE: 06-19-08 El Calvario
ACTION DATE: 07-17-08 3909 W. 47th Ave.
Kennewick, WA 99337
BACKGROUND
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church in a C-1 District
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: Lots 7 & 8 Block 7, Pettit's 2nd Addition
General Location: 216 North 11th Ave.
Property Size: 5,750 sq. ft.
2. ACCESS: The site has access from 11th Ave.
3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer are available to the site from the
right-of-way adjacent to the south line of the property. The property is
not currently connected to city utilities.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned C-1 and is
developed with a single-family dwelling. The properties to the north, south
and east are all zoned C-1. The Bank of the West is located on the east
side of 11th Ave and a car wash and vacant lot are located to the south of
the site. A vacant commercial building and vacant lot are located to the
north. The properties to the west are zoned R-2 and developed with
single-family dwellings.
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The site is designated in the Plan for future
low density residential, but is adjacent to areas that are designated for
commercial uses (to the south & east). The site can be considered in a
transition area which could be developed for either commercial activities
or for residential development. The plan does not specifically address
churches, but various elements of the plan encourage adequate provision
of off-street parking and locating businesses in appropriate locations for
their anticipated uses. Policies of the plan also encourage the location of
facilities for educational and cultural activities in the City.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a
Determination of Nonsignificance in accordance with review under the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 (c) (RCW).
1
ANALYSIS
The application involves the conversion of an existing 884-square-foot single-
family house to a church facility. The site contains 5,750 square feet of land
and has a small (10 ft. wide) driveway and parking pad off 11th Ave. The yard
area around the house has been poorly maintained for many years.
Although the proposed church has only 20 members at the current time the
occupancy standards in the building code would permit close to 100 persons to
occupy the building. The municipal code requires one parking space for every
four seats in a church where there is no fixed seating. The existing membership
would only require 5 parking spaces while the maximum occupancy load would
require 25 parking spaces. The site is not large enough for 25 parking spaces.
The site is totally lacking in necessary landscaping. In addition to the lack of
landscaping the site does not have a paved parking lot or the necessary
ADA/handicap-access facilities (ramps doors & restroom facilities).
The house on the site was originally constructed in 1951 to the residential
construction standards of that time. Converting the dwelling from a residential
occupancy classification (R-3 per the IBC) brings with it a number of issues.
Places of religious worship are classified in the building code as "A"
occupancies. When a building is changed from one occupancy class to another
(from an R-3 to an "A" for example) the building is required to meet the
life/safety standards required for the new occupancy classification. In this case
the building will need to have 2 restroom facilities meeting the handicapped
regulations; Exit signage will be needed for all exits; exit doors will need to
swing out (with an occupancy load of 50); and emergency lighting may be
needed. Two exits to the outside will be need for the main floor with
modification for handicapped facilities. The basement can not be used for
Sunday school classrooms, nurseries or other similar uses unless there are two
exits.
Another concern about converting an exiting house to a church is the
structural integrity of the building. If interior walls are removed or relocated to
create a sanctuary or chapel it may impact the stability of the roof.
Additionally, adding the weight of 50 or more people (along with books, book
cases, a piano etc) to the floor of the house may add more weight to the floor
than the floor was designed to support. If the special permit was to be approved
it may be necessary to have structural engineering done to address these
concerns.
The "A" occupancy requirements of the building code have been developed from
years of experience with places of assembly and have been enacted in to law for
the life, safety, and protection of people occupying churches and other
gathering places.
2
Churches are typically located in or adjacent to residential zoning districts
within the city. The operational history of churches within Pasco has shown
churches generate very few complaints from adjoining property owners.
Churches are generally well maintained and add to the overall appearance and
character of the community.
Given the fact that it is the nature of all churches to seek additional members
the size of the lot and house in question will pose practical difficulties for the
proposed church to expand beyond 20 members. The lot is smaller than most
of the new residential lots being developed today so there is no room to
accommodate future growth. There is only room for about 5 parking stalls in
the rear of the house and two on the driveway in the front. That allows the
church to have 28 members. The vacant lot to the south may be available for
future expansion but it is only 8,625 square feet in size and of that square
footage about 1,100 will be need for the setback landscaping.
INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report.
The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the
result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record
hearing.
1. Churches are unclassified uses and require review through the special
permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district.
2. The proposed church site is zoned C-1.
3. The proposed site is located at 216 North 11th Ave.
4. The site contains 5,750 square feet.
5. The site is developed with a single family house.
6. The vacant lot to the south contains 8,625 square feet.
7. The driveway into the site is 10 feet wide and about 40 feet long.
8. There is no parking lot on the site.
9. The rear yard has enough room for a 5 stall parking lot.
10. The operation of churches within residential or commercial districts of
Pasco generates few complaints from neighboring properties.
11. The existing on site building contains 884 square feet on the main floor
and 884 square feet in the basement.
12. The building was constructed in 1951.
3
13. Existing membership of the church is about 20 persons.
14. The Municipal Code (PMC 25.78.170) requires one off-street parking
space for every 10 lineal feet of bench (pew) seating or one space for every
4 chairs in a church.
15. The building code permits an occupancy load of one person per every 7
square feet of floor area in assembly occupancies such as churches.
16. Based on the occupancy loading the existing building could hold about
100 people.
17. 100 people would require 25 parking spaces
18. The current area available for parking improvements will only allow the
church to accommodate 28 members.
19. The house was designed and built for residential occupancy loads.
20. A church is an "A" occupancy under the provision of the International
Building Code.
21. "A" occupancy building design standards are different than the
residential occupancy standards.
22. The building on site does not meet "A" occupancy building design
standards
23. The building on site does not meet ADA accessibility standards for
ADA/handicapped access and use.
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows:
1 j Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, objectives
and text of the Comprehensive Plan?
Policy LU-1- encourages the continuous actions to improve the City's
physical environment. LU-2-13 encourages the support of facilities for
educational and cultural activities.
2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
The proposed use will not have an adverse impact on public infrastructure.
However, as the proposed church grows it will create more demand on
public utilities than the current residential use of the property.
3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in
harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity?
4
The intended character of the general vicinity is a mix between residential
and commercial. Commercial development exists to the east and the south.
Churches are typically located in or near residential areas and add to the
character of a neighborhood due to special architectural features and well-
landscaped yards. The proposed church initially will be maintained in
harmony with the character of the neighborhood. However as the church
grows there will not be sufficient space on the lot to accommodate any
growth.
4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design
discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general
vicinity or impair the value thereof?
The presence of churches near residential or commercial neighborhoods in
other parts of the community has not discouraged potential development or
impaired the value of adjoining properties. As the proposed church grows
the lack of space on-site will cause church members to park on the street or
in the alley, thereby impacting surrounding properties owners.
5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to
nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or
flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the
district?
Initial use of the property will not create more objectionable conditions in
the neighborhood. However, as the proposed church grows, increased traffic
and activities on such a small parcel may impact the use of other nearby
properties.
6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and
developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses
permitted in the district?
Churches are generally accepted uses in or near residential neighborhoods.
Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do not
endanger public health or safety. A majority of the recently approved
churches have been located on parcels considerably larger than the
proposed parcel.
RECOMMENDATION
5
MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact
and conclusions as contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report.
MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning
Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to
' Igiesia Bautista El Calvario for the location of a church at 216 North 1lth
Avenue with conditions as contained in the July 17, 2007 staff report:
Approval Conditions
1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
2) The parking lot in the rear of the building must be hard surfaced;
3) All parking lot and site drainage must be contained on-site;
4) No additional parking facilities are permitted off North 11th Avenue;
5) The front yard and available side yard areas must be landscaped
with at least 65 percent of the landscaping consisting of live
vegetation as defined by PMC 25.75.030(4);
6) All yard areas must be maintained free of weeds dust and litter;
7) The building must comply with all requirements of the
International Building Code for an "A" occupancy prior to
occupancy by the church;
8) The building, including the basement, must meet all building code
exiting requirements prior to occupancy by the church;
9) The building including entrances and restrooms must be
ADA/handicap-compliant prior to occupancy by the church;
10) Occupancy of the building for church purposes will not be
permitted until the church complies with all conditions listed
above;
11) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco,
occupancy registration has not obtained by August 31, 2009.
6
LVAX.l o
w5)
Ln
3
-,r:: -- �, �• rL��•.'.-;,��y.� .gip,._. .j _ _ '.�,, Jy .P'
! g� "Al
IJ
ob! bz
-1
o.�OS LEI.
�w
i. .� '•, l7tGJe4 i
�.� ,A- _-
.. .F .. ,
�r yy 'eE,�,�.e,� ,Fief` y '� .o a6 � �,t.• i_..
.iC -is tt:... `,Rte:.;itis.�-. t__,. .:nr.• - .. � .�'t-w'..
Q 1'�RY •�e�yn ' `y ���� k�� .nf
pl-o
PIR
Alli,
ilk-. _•�,... Tom.. � i p.4- '.!I': .' �"',1 A' S �.�W. 4
� � . 'll. n 1E�'•y-yam ',Y�
7'"�� >.�F'=' ��' Y���A•�; � � �\.: Mai'-
V�
z �O
U � O
0
�
� 4-j 'COO
;z
• � o � d
Ct
� � v
.�\A P
to
V�
z �0
U r•
0 P
+� �,
• . . A
ct oo Z
O
Planning Commission Minutes
6/19/08
D. Special Permit I lesia Bautista El Calvario fjoe Franco 216 N.
11th Avel(MF#08-0041
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments.
Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to
surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed site. Staff explained
the application was for a proposed church to be located in a pre-existing home
in a commercial zoning district on N 11th Ave. Staff reviewed the surrounding
land uses and the written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission.
Staff explained that as with the previous church application, converting a house
to a church changes the occupancy classification and the building code
requirements for exiting and other safety issues. The site lacks hard surfaced
parking and lacks landscaping.
Chairman Samuel asked about the situation with the current church located in
the vicinity.
Staff stated the church to the north was required to provide a hard surface
parking lot, make structural renovations, and provided landscaping to improve
the appearance of the lot.
Commissioner Little asked about the hours of operation for services.
Staff commented churches typically operate on Sundays and hold a weekly night
meeting.
Chairman Samuel opened the hearing for public comment.
Joe Franco, 3909 W. 47th, Kennewick, represents the church and stated they
have been renting space from another church. He has prepared a budget and
proposal to purchase their own church. They currently have 20 members. The
building has new stucco, A/C, and paint. He stated there are two stairwells to
the basement. He further noted he is a federal employee and understands rules
and regulations and intends to follow all requirements of the City. Services will
be held on Sundays and Wednesday evenings.
Chairman Samuel questioned the parking situation.
Mr. Franco stated there is a slab in the rear of the property that has enough
room for 6 cars, as well as in the front of the property with a 1 car garage and a
driveway that would allow for 1-2 additional parking spaces.
Chairman Samuel asked staff about any similar parking situations.
Staff commented there are several other similar parking situations in the City of
Pasco which have alley access to parking.
Chairman Samuel opened the hearing for public comment.
Roy Fiesic, 1812 W. Sylvester, stated he is a member of the neighboring church
and welcomes the addition to the neighborhood.
Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing.
Staff and the Planning Commission discussed the need to improve the exterior
landscaping, improve the parking lot area, address building code issues and add
a storm water drainage system near the alley.
Commissioner Anderson asked about the occupancy number for this site.
Staff stated the code permit one person per 7 square feet. The building in theory
could hold 100 people based on square footage.
Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Hay, to close the
hearing on a proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoptions of
findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the
July 17, 2008 meeting. The motion passed unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes
7/17/08
C. Special Permit Iglesia Bautista El Calvario (Joe Franco)(216 N.
11th Ave)(MF#SP08-004)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments.
Staff stated this item was presented last month at the public hearing. Staff
provided a list of recommended conditions for approval of the special permit.
Staff also explained as was discussed briefly previously the Public Works
Department had some concerns about public access to the proposed church
through the alley. The main concern was the alley not being the standard width
of a street. Staff explained the church would only have 6 parking spaces in the
alley which would generate 24 vehicle trips each week vs. residential neighbors
generating an estimated 70 vehicle trips each week per house.
Commissioner Schouviller asked what type of road surface was in the alley.
Staff stated it was an oiled rock surface and the section by the car wash is
paved.
Commissioner Schouviller moved seconded by Commissioner Little the Planning
Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the
July 17, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved unanimously.
Commissioner Schouviller further moved based on the findings of fact as
adopted Seconded by Commissioner Kempf, the Planning Commission
recommend the City Council grant a special permit to Iglesia Bautista El
Calvario for the location of a church at 216 North 11th Avenue with conditions as
contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved
unanimously.
Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the
first regular meeting in August, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would
cause a closed record hearing to be held before the City Council.
AGENDA REPORT NO. 34
FOR: City Council July 30, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfie Manager Regular Mtg.: 8/4/08
Rick White, Di c r
Community & conomic Development
FROM: David I. McDonald, City Planner
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT• Location of a Church at 3212 Wernett Rd(Iglesia
A ostolica de la fe en Cristo Jesus) (MF# SP08-003
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Report to Planning Commission
2. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 6/19/08 & 7/17/08
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve the special permit for the Iglesia Apostolica
de la fe en Cristo Jesus at 3212 Wernett Road, as recommended
by the Planning Commission.
III.FISCAL IMPACT:
A. NONE
IV.HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On June 17, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine
whether or not to recommend a special permit for the location of a church at 3212
Wemett Road.
B. Following conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that with
conditions, it would be appropriate to recommend approval of a special permit for the
location of a church at 3212 Wemett Road. The recommended conditions are contained
in the attached Planning Commission report.
C. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received.
10(9)
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-003 APPLICANT: Iglesia Apostolica
HEARING DATE: 06-19-08 De La Fe En Cristo Jesus
ACTION DATE: 07-11-08 2921 W Ella St
Pasco, WA 99301
BACKGROUND
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL PERMIT: Location of a Church in a Residential
District (R-1).
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: Lot 1, Short Plat 2008-09
General Location: 3212 Wernett Road.
Property Size: 1.45 Acres
2. ACCESS: The site has access from Wernett Road.
3. UTILITIES: Municipal water and sewer are available to the site from the
right-of-way adjacent the south line of the property. The property is not
currently connected to city utilities.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The property is currently zoned R-1 and is
developed with a single-family dwelling. The property to the west is
vacant R-1 land which is proposed to be developed with single family
dwellings (See Agenda Item V, B) All other surrounding properties are
zoned R-S-12 and developed primarily with single-family dwellings. A few
scattered multi-family dwellings are also located in the general vicinity. I-
182 is located to the north.
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates the
property and surrounding areas for low-density residential development.
The plan does not specifically address churches, but various elements of
the plan encourage adequate provision of off-street parking and locating
businesses in appropriate locations for their anticipated uses. Policies of
the plan also encourage the location of facilities for educational and
cultural activities in the City.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a
Determination of Nonsignificance in accordance with review under the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 (c) (RCW).
ANALYSIS
The application involves the conversion of an existing 1,529 square foot single-
family house to a church facility. The house has an attached 441 square foot
garage and there is a 1,248 square foot shop building on the site. The site
contains 1.45 acres of land.
The proposed church currently has a small membership of about 30 members.
The occupancy standards in the building code would permit close to 170
persons to occupy the building. The municipal code requires one parking space
for every four seats in a church where there is no fixed seating. The existing
membership would only require 7-8 parking spaces while the maximum
occupancy load would require 43 parking spaces. The site has enough room
for 43 parking spaces. However, the site currently does not have a hard-
surfaced parking lot for even 7 parking spaces.
The site has some landscaping around the house and no landscaping toward
the freeway on the north. Not only does the site lack a parking lot, it lacks the
necessary handicapped access facilities (ramps doors & restroom facilities).
The house on the site was originally constructed in 1951 (modified in 1958 to
the residential construction standards of that time. Converting the dwelling
from a residential occupancy classification (R-3 per the IBC) brings with it a
number of issues. Places of religious worship are classified in the building code
as "A" occupancies. When a building is changed from one occupancy class to
another (from an R-3 to an A, for example) the building is required to meet the
life/safety standards required for the new occupancy classification. In this case
the building will need to have 2 restroom facilities meeting the handicapped
regulations; Exit signage will be needed for all exits; exit doors will need to
swing out (with an occupancy load of well over 100) and emergency lighting
may be needed. Two exits to the outside will be needed for the main floor with
modification for handicapped facilities. The basement can not be used for
Sunday school classrooms, nurseries or other similar uses unless there are two
exits to the outside.
Another concern about converting an exiting house to a church is the
structural integrity of the building. If interior walls are removed or relocated to
create a sanctuary or chapel it may impact the stability of the roof.
Additionally, adding the weight of 100 or more people (along with books, book
cases, a piano etc) to the floor of the house may add more weight to the floor
than the floor was designed to support. If the special permit was to be approved
it may be necessary to have structural engineering done to address these
concerns.
The "A" occupancy requirements of the building code have been developed from
years of experience with places of assembly and have been enacted into law for
2
the life, safety and protection of people occupying churches and other
gathering places.
Churches are typically located in or adjacent to residential zoning districts
within the city. The operational history of churches within Pasco has shown
that churches generate very few complaints from adjoining property owners.
The complaints that are received are often related to traffic. The church near
the intersection of Wernett and 28th Ave has generated some complaints about
traffic. Most churches in West Pasco are located conveniently to collector or
arterial streets thereby helping to reduce the impact of church traffic through
neighborhoods. The proposed site is located half a mile north of Court Street
north of a residential neighborhood. Road 36 is about a quarter of a mile to the
west.
Given the fact that it is the nature of all churches to seek additional members,
future additions may create some problems for the neighborhood.
Other issues to consider center on the need for a hard-surfaced parking lot,
curb and gutter, sidewalks and a perhaps a sound wall along the north
property line (These are all issues that were discussed in the report for the Sun
View Estates preliminary plat directly to the west).
INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report.
The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the
result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record
hearing.
1. Churches are unclassified uses and require review through the special
permit process prior to locating or expanding in any zoning district.
2. The proposed church site is zoned R-1.
3. The proposed site is located at 3212 Wernett Rd
4. The site contains 1.45 acres
5. The site is developed with a single-family house and shop.
6. The driveway into the site is 10 feet wide and about 40 feet long.
7. There is no parking lot on the site.
8. The operation of churches within residential or commercial districts of
Pasco generates few complaints from neighboring properties.
9. Complaints about churches usually involve traffic.
3
10. The existing building contains 1,529 square feet on the main floor and
1,248 square feet in the basement.
11. The building was constructed in 1951 with additional work done in 1958.
12. Existing membership of the church is about 30 persons.
13. The Municipal Code (PMC 25.78.170) requires one off-street parking
space for every 10 lineal feet of bench (pew) seating or one space for every
4 chairs in a church.
14. The building code permits an occupancy load of one person per every 7
square feet of floor area in assembly occupancies such as churches.
15. Based on the occupancy loading, the existing building could hold about
170 people.
16. 170 people would require 43 parking spaces
17. The house was designed and built for residential occupancy loads.
18. A church is an "A" occupancy under the provision of the International
Building Code.
19. "A" occupancy standards are different than the residential occupancy
standards.
20. 'The building on site does not meet "A" occupancy standards of the
building code.
21. The building on site does not meet ADA accessibility standards for
handicapped access and use.
22. I-182 is located on the north side of the site.
23. There is no curb, gutter, or sidewalk abutting the site.
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as follows:
1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies, Objectives
and text of the Comprehensive PIan?
Policy LU-1- encourages the continuous actions to improve the City's
physical environment. LU-2-B encourages the support of facilities for
educational and cultural activities.
2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
4
The proposed use will not have an adverse impact on public infrastructure.
However, as the proposed church grows it will create more demand on
public utilities than the current residential use of the property and will
generate additional traffic through the neighborhood.
3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated to be in
harmony with existing or intended character of the general vicinity?
The intended character of the general vicinity is low density single family
residential development. Churches are generally maintained and operated in
conformity with the general character of residential neighborhoods. Traffic is
sometimes an issue.
4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site design
discourage the development of permitted uses on property in the general
vicinity or impair the value thereofp
The presence of churches near residential neighborhoods in other parts of
the community has not discouraged potential development or impaired the
value of adjoining properties. As the proposed church grows, traffic may
become a source of contention for the neighborhood.
5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more objectionable to
nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes vibrations, dust, traffic, or
flashing lights than would be the operation of any permitted uses within the
district?
Initial use of the property will not create more objectionable conditions in
the neighborhood. However, as the proposed church grows, increased traffic
and activities may impact the residential neighborhood to the south.
6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if located and
developed where proposed, or in anyway will become a nuisance to uses
permitted in the district?
Churches are generally accepted uses in or near residential neighborhoods.
Past history of church operations within the City has shown they do not
endanger public health or safety.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact
and conclusions as contained in the July 17, 2008 staff report.
5
MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning
Commission recommend the City Council grant a special permit to
Iglesia Apostolica De La Fe En Cristo Jesus for the location of a church
at 3212 Wernett Road with conditions as contained in the July 17, 2007
staff report:
Approval Conditions
1) The special permit shall be personal to the applicant;
2) No parking shall be permitted in the front yard area;
3) The parking lot must be hard surfaced;
4) All parking lot and site drainage must be contained on-site;
5) The front yard landscaping must be restored and maintained at
residential standards consistent with PMC 25.75
6) All side-yard and rear-yard areas must be landscaped and
maintained free of weeds dust and litter;
7) The building, including the basement, must comply with all
requirements of the International Building Code for an "A"
occupancy prior to occupancy by the church;
8) The building, including the basement, must meet all building code
exiting requirements prior to occupancy by the church;
9) The building including entrances and restrooms must be
ADA/handicap-compliant prior to occupancy by the church;
10) The Church shall install a sound wall along the north property line
abutting I-182. Said sound wall shall be a minimum of 8 feet in
height above the grade of the adjoining 1-182 freeway. The sound
wall must be approved by the City Planner prior to construction.
11) The Church shall connect to City water and sewer service;
12) A solid fence at least four feet in height must be installed along the
east and west property lines;
13) The church must improve Wernett Road to City Standards as
approved by the City Engineer. This includes but is not limited to
curb, gutter sidewalk, street lights, fire hydrants, storm water
retention and fire hydrants.
14) Occupancy of the building for church purposes will not be
permitted until the church complies with all conditions listed
above;
15) The special permit shall be null and void if a City of Pasco
occupancy registration has not obtained by August 31, 2009.
6
.ir k.eYSi>�W>. v�ay.; .,Ytr T! :"�,j~1'yb»'�:. Fi. SY.�!!•.'a: - � �,a: '�tC
Mi�r"..•,�4`Sm^n•��X�.�yfi aa+" # ���-i"'. r t � X" ;y,;.�$ .
�+ -AD;
opt
lob
dip
db
'44 a
A r 1� •
F' k
.A aY.J r a { •#�.
• � 1 �i• • L µr �' 6X T
Jr •sir ! r=1 ]"
4J .]i•>,itl yIff r'j1 ,n+./'� Mt.
..
•' f�� �,rF r � vi
!/r• f t,+' �I f `+'`,�F�fF j'!�!'�'r f jj� � �"' �3c•`'`�. n N'� Y .•
'�� •fir - �� fr �1,�: ..:
'�Ii�{t�'
r ,t/ i.• �n::j f Ir ff t ' ' �.: fi, ...,"'".a.�,�l'
'!! ,`iii.'i..' :`',a;',;fr��,r•�/J•�iT 1' r fi� i � �, ���` � i� � �,
y,i.
F£ a
doa a
0
0
m
Cl)
Z£abOa
LU
� 4�
r
Q-r 4� O ti Z
00 ct
' LLI
• • Iv£ adoa
c�
V
5£ as
� a
adoa
os aeob
o
0
w
m
w
r
Cl)
ze odoa
w
, o
� Cl)�
. ,� N
ct
r EE c
Z cn
LLI
00
U • •
K oeob
r'
� CD s as Q
•POO
O
N
sE oaaa
I
FI �
' o
a � u
U C
G
I
I
E
i MIT
zo
I
Planning Commission Minutes
6/19/08
C. Special Permit Iglesia Ayostolica De La Fe En Cristo Jesus
(Francisco Barrera) (3212 Wernett Rd)(MF#08-
0031
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments.
Staff stated public notice was published in the newspaper and mailed to
surrounding property owners within 300 ft of the proposed site. Staff explained
the application was for a proposed church to be located in a pre-existing home
adjacent the proposed Sun View Estates discussed in the last hearing. Staff
reviewed the written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission.
It was pointed out the house was built many years ago to residential
construction standards. Converting the house to a church changes the
occupancy classification and the building code requirements for exiting and
other safety issues. A change in occupancy will require code upgrades. Staff
discussed the issue of the R-1 zoning requiring street improvements, the lack of
a hard surfaced parking lot, sound wall concerns that were raised for Sun View
Estates, the lack of handicapped accessibility, and general property
maintenance.
Commissioner Little asked about parking lot lighting and if the restroom
facilities would be hooked up to sewer services.
Staff stated to accommodate the occupancy level requested the church would be
required to convert to sewer services vs. a septic tank.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing for comments from the public.
Obdulia Chavez, translator for the Pastor Francisco Barrera, 2921 W Ella, stated
the church wants a place to worship and pray. The church currently has 30
members and they have been in Pasco for 13 years. Their lack of growth may be
due to the lack of a place to have a church. They are willing to fulfill the
requirements of the City of Pasco. At present, their intentions are to remodel,
and in the future, expand the facility.
Chairman Samuel questioned if they are willing to accommodate the City's
requirements for bathrooms, parking, building code requirements, etc.
Obdulia Chavez answered they are prepared to accommodate the requirements.
Commissioner Schouviller asked where their current place of worship was
located.
Obdulia Chavez answered they are renting space from another church at 217 N.
Douglas, Pasco, WA.
Ray Rojas, Minister/Contractor, 820 Wrigley, has evaluated the property and as
a contractor he can convert the house into a church. They have been looking for
a place that can accommodate their members.
Chairman Samuel questioned after renovations are made, would the outward
appearance be changed considering the current condition is not very appealing.
Ray Rojas stated they have plans to upgrade the look of the church.
Commissioner Little asked if they understood the improvements would need to
be completed prior to occupancy.
Ray Rojas stated yes, they are fully aware and are anxious to get started.
Lauren Mitchell, 3605 Agate, was concerned with the increased traffic this
church would bring. He also stated the street is narrow and there are no
sidewalks.
Terry Kirkwood, Kennewick, stated Road 32 is the widest street in the area. It is
even wider than Road 68; it has a traffic signal at Court Street and he feels there
will be no problems with traffic. He also stated his father built the house and it
is a solid house.
Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Schouviller moved, seconded by Commissioner Little, to close the
hearing on a proposed special permit and schedule deliberations, adoption of
findings of fact, conclusions and a recommendation to the City Council for the
July 17, 2008 meeting. The motion was unanimously approved.
Planning Commission Minutes
7/17/08
B. Special Permit I lesia Apostolica De La Fe En Cristo Jesus
(Francisco Barrera) (3212 Wernett
Rd)(MF#SP08-0031
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for comments.
Staff stated this item was presented last month at the public hearing. Staff
provided a list of recommended conditions for approval of the special permit.
Staff pointed out condition #10 references a sound wall and should be
consistent with the conditions set for the previous agenda item. Staff stated the
list of conditions was mailed to the applicant prior to the Planning Commission
meeting.
Commissioner Hay moved seconded by Commissioner Schouviller the Planning
Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and conclusions as contained in the
July 17, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved unanimously.
Commissioner Hay further moved based on the findings of fact as adopted
seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, the Planning Commission recommend
the City Council grant a special permit to Iglesia Apostolica De La Fe En Cristo
Jesus for the location of a church at 3212 Wernett Road with conditions as
contained in the July 17, 2007 staff report. The motion was approved
unanimously.
Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the
first regular meeting in August, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would
cause a closed record hearing to be held before the City Council.