HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008.06.02 Council Meeting Packet AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. June 2,2008
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance.
3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by roil call vote as one motion (in the form listed below). There will be
no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Councilmembers or the public,
the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately.
(a) ' Approval of Minutes:
1. Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated May 19, 2008.
(b) Bills and Communications: (A detailed listing of claims is available for review in the Finance
Manager's office.)
1. To approve General Claims in the amount of$991,739.23 ($98,030.24 in the form of Wire
Transfer Nos. 4974 and 4976 and, $893,708.99 consisting of Claim Warrants numbered
166089 through 166277).
2. To approve Payroll Claims in the amount of $1,735,405.94, Voucher Nos. 37896 through
38013; and EFT Deposit Nos. 30023075 through 30023569.
(c) Interagency Agreement for Summer School Services:
1. Agenda Report from Denis Austin, Chief of Police dated May 20, 2008.
2. Proposed Interagency Agreement.
To approve the Interagency Agreement with the Pasco School District for summer school
services and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
(d) Bargaining Contract with IAFF,Local 1433:
1. Agenda Report from Lynne Jackson,Human Resources Manager dated May 22, 2008,
2. Proposed Collective Bargaining Agreement (Council packets only; copy in Human
Resources Office and Pasco Public Library for public review).
To approve the Collective Bargaining Agreement with the IAFF, Local #1433 and, further,
authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
*(e) Final Plat: Three Rivers Crossing Phase 5 (Hayden Homes) (MF#FP08-005):
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated May 28, 2008.
2. Final Plat (Council packets only; copy available in Planning Office, the Pasco Library or on
the City's webpage at www.pasco-wa._gov for public review).
3. Vicinity Map.
To approve the final plat for Three Rivers Crossing Phase 5.
*(f) Resolution No. 3079, a Resolution accepting work performed by Sharpe&Preszler Construction
Company,Inc.,under contract for the Water Sampling Station Installation Project No. 07-2-05.
1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated May 19, 2008.
2. Resolution.
To approve Resolution No. 3079, accepting the work performed by Sharpe & Preszler
Construction Company, Inc., under contract for the Water Sampling Station Installation Project
No. 07-2-05.
*(g) Resolution No. 3080, a Resolution accepting work performed by Granite Northwest, Inc., dba
Transtate Paving Company under contract for the Commercial Avenue Reconstruction Project
No. 05-3-07.
1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated May 23, 2008,
2. Resolution.
To approve Resolution No. 3080, accepting the work performed by Granite Northwest, Inc., dba
Transtate Paving Company, under contract for the Commercial Avenue Reconstruction Project
No. 5-3-07.
(RIC) MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
Regular Meeting 2 June 2, 2008
4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
(a) "Yard of the Month" Awards. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA) The following
Pasco residents have been invited to attend the Council meeting to receive Certificates of
Appreciation from Mayor Joyce Olson for"Yard of the Month,"May 2008.
1. Mike and Barb Weakley, 904 Margaret Street
2. Lenny Carlson and Kathy Dundon, 3820 W.Nixon Street
3. Rosetta Logston, 4518 Cholla Drive
4. John and Judy Pettigrew, 6219 Cowlitz Lane
(b) "Business of the Mouth" Appearance Award. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA)
The following Pasco business has been invited to attend the Council meeting to receive a
Certificate of Appreciation from Mayor Joyce Olson for "Business of the Month Appearance
Award"for May 2008.
1. Riverview Obstetrics &Gynecology, 5908 Bedford Street
5. VISITORS -OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS:
(a)
(b)
(c)
6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
(b)
(c)
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO:
(None)
8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS:
*(a) Resolution No. a Resolution establishing committees for voter pamphlet
statements.
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated May 30, 2008,
2. RCW 29A.32.280.
3. County Auditor Rules for Committee Statements.
4. Proposed Resolution.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , appointing ad-hoc citizen committees for
the preparation of voter pamphlet statements regarding the Pasco Pools Bond issue.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
(None)
10. NEW BUSINESS:
(a) Columbia River Crossing Study:
1. Agenda Report from Robert J. Alberts, Public Works Director dated May 28, 2008.
MOTION: I move to approve the authorization for a bridge study between Road 68 and the
SR395 Blue Bridge by the Benton Franklin Council of Governments (BFCG) and, further,
authorize$ for the study.
(b) Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with The Transpo Group:
1. Agenda Report from Robert J.Alberts, Public Works Director dated May 20, 2008.
2. Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement,Figures 1 &2.
MOTION: I move to approve Amendment No. 2 to the August 16, 2004 Professional Services
Agreement with The Transpo Group authorizing additional transportation and traffic
management services not to exceed $39,500 and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the
agreement.
(c) Amendment No.3 to Professional Services Agreement with The Transpo Group:
1. Agenda Report from Robert J. Alberts, Public Works Director dated May 20, 2008.
2. Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement for Mobility Strategy.
3. Study Boundary Map.
MOTION: I move to approve Amendment No. 3 to the August 16, 2004 Professional Services
Agreement with the Transpo Group authorizing additional transportation and traffic management
services not to exceed$53,000 and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Regular Meeting 3 June 2, 2008
(d) Baseball Stadium Lease Amendment:
1. Agenda Report from Stan Strebel, Administrative & Community Services Director dated
May 22, 2008.
2. Proposed Lease Amendment.
3. Letter of Understanding.
MOTION: I move to approve the First Amendment to the Baseball Stadium Lease and, further,
authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment.
(e) New Police Officer Position:
1. Agenda Report from Denis Austin, Chief of Police dated May 20,2008.
2. Addendum to Interagency Agreement.
MOTION: I move to approve the addendum for the Interagency Agreement with the Pasco
School District for School Resources Officer services and authorize one additional police officer
position to be filled as soon as possible and, further, direct the additional expense be included in
the year-end General Fund Supplemental Budget.
(f) Professional Services Agreement for Corridor Enhancement Study:
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated May 23, 2008.
2. Proposed Agreement.
MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with JUB Engineers for the
Corridor Enhancement Study and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Q*(g) Special Permit: Farming in an R-S-1 Zone(7500 Block of Argent Road) (DNR) (MF#SP08-
001):
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated May 28, 2008.
2. Report to Planning Commission.
3. Planning Commission Minutes dated 4117/08 and 5/15/08.
MOTION: I move to approve the special permit for the location of a farm in the 7500 block of
Argent Road as recommended by the Planning Commission.
11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
13. ADJOURNMENT.
(RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
MF# "Master File#...:.
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
REMINDERS:
1. 1:30 p.m., Monday, June 2, KGH—Emergency Medical Services Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER
TOM LARSEN,Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.)
2. 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, June 4, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue — Franklin County Mosquito Control District
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.)
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL MAY 19, 2008
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Joyce Olson, Mayor.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers present: Rebecca Francik, Michael Garrison, Robert Hoffmann, Tom
Larsen, Joyce Olson, Matt Watkins and Al Yenney.
Staff present: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager; Leland B. Ken, City Attorney; Stan
Strebel, Administrative & Community Services Director; Bob Alberts, Public Works
Director; David McDonald, City Planner; Denis Austin, Police Chief; Paul Whitemarsh,
Recreation Services Manager and Doyle Heath, Utility Engineer.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA:
(a) Approval of Minutes:
Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated May 5, 2008.
(b) Bills and Communications:
To approve General Claims in the amount of$2,105,486.30 ($66,966.04 in the form of
Wire Transfer Nos. 4966 and 4972 and, $2,038,520.26 consisting of Claim Warrants
numbered 165862 through 166088).
To approve bad debt write-offs for utility billing, ambulance, cemetery, general accounts,
miscellaneous accounts and Municipal Court non-criminal, criminal and parking accounts
receivable in the total amount of$200,834.93 and, of that amount, authorize $126,027.65
be turned over for collection.
(c) Appointments to Planning Commission:
To reappoint Tony Schouviller to Position No. 7 and to appoint Jana Kempf to Position
No. 8 (both with the expiration date of 2/l/2014) to the Planning Commission.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the Consent Agenda as read. Mr. Garrison
seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote.
PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
Mayor Joyce Olson presented a Proclamation to Mike Reimer, Water Distribution Plan
Foreman,proclaiming May 18-24,2008, "Public Works Week."
Mayor Olson and Mr. Crutchfield acknowledged Police Chief Denis Austin for his award
of"Chief of the Year," from the Washington State Crime Prevention Association.
VISITORS - OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS:
Mayor Olson recognized students in the audience from Columbia Basin College.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
Mr. Watkins reported he attended "One Washington" forum featuring WA State Speaker
of the House Frank Chopp,
Mr. Hoffmann and Mayor Olson commented on the Rd 54 Boat Launch Opening
Ceremony.
1 3(a).1
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL MAY 19,2008
Mr. Larsen reported on the Benton Franklin Council of Governments Board Meeting.
Ms. Francik reported on the WA State Public Works Board retreat.
Mayor Olson attended the annual Police Memorial Event at Columbia Park.
Mr. Hoffmann commented on the General Fund Operating Statement through April 2008,
noting Sales Tax revenue is ahead of budget.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND
RESOLUTIONS RELATING THERETO:
Local Improvement District(LID) No. 144 for Road 90 and Road 92, North of
Sandifur Parkway.
Council and staff discussed the details of the proposed LID.
MAYOR OLSON DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN TO CONSIDER THE LID.
FOLLOWING THREE CALLS FOR COMMENTS,EITHER FOR OR AGAINST, AND THERE BEING
NONE, MAYOR OLSON DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.
Ordinance No. 3864, an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, relating to city
street improvements; ordering the improvement to approximately 1300 feet of each
of Road 90 and Road 92, north of Sandifur Parkway, to city standards,to include
curb, gutter, storm drainage system, and power, all in accordance with Resolution
No. 3075 of the City Council; establishing Local Improvement District No. 144, and
ordering the carrying out of the proposed improvements; providing that payment
for the improvements be made by special assessments upon the property in the
District, payable by the mode of"payment by bonds"; and providing for the
issuance and sale of local improvement district warrants redeemable in cash or
other short-term financing and local improvement district bonds.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to adopt Ordinance No. 3864, creating Local
Improvement District No. 144 for Road.90 and Road 92, North of Sandifur Parkway. Mr.
Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Ordinance No. 3863, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Pasco,
Washington, providing for the submission to the voters of the city at a special
election to be held therein on August 19, 2008, in conjunction with the state primary
election to be held on the same date, of a proposition authorizing the city to issue
general obligation bonds in the principal amount of no more than $5,000,000 (or
such lesser maximum amount as may be legally issued under the laws governing the
limitation of indebtedness), for the purpose of paying costs of renovating memorial
park swimming pool and acquiring, constructing and equipping a new outdoor
aquatic facility, the principal of and interest on such bonds to be payable from
annual property tax levies to be made in excess of regular property tax levies; and
designating the city attorney to receive notice of the ballot title from the Auditor of
Franklin County,Washington.
Council and staff discussed the details of the bond issue.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to adopt Ordinance No. 3863, providing for submission
to the voters of the question of issuing bonds to finance the Aquatic Facilities Project.
Ms. Francik seconded. Motion carried by the following Roll Call vote: Yes—Francik,
Olson, Garrison, Hoffrnann, Watkins. No —Larsen, Yenney,
Ordinance No. 3865, an Ordinance amending PMC Chapter 17.05 dealing with the
height of wall sign lettering.
2
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL MAY 19,2008
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to adopt Ordinance No. 3865, amending PMC Chapter
17.05 dealing with sign lettering and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Ms.
Francik seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No. 3078, a Resolution establishing City policy on subdivision boundary
fencing standards.
Council and staff discussed the details of the proposed fencing standards.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve Resolution No. 3078, establishing city policy
for construction of subdivision boundary fences. Ms. Francik seconded. Motion carried
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
Council Chambers Video Upgrade:
Council and Staff discussed the proposed upgrade.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the Council Chambers video upgrade project
not to exceed$35,000 and, further, direct that the amount be included in the year-end
general fund supplemental budget. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried 6-1. No—
Larsen.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the purchase of the Council Chambers video
system backup equipment not to exceed $16,000 and, further, direct that the amount be
included in the year-end general fund supplemental budget. Mr. Garrison seconded.
Motion carried 6-1. No— Larsen.
MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
Jan Neuenschwander inquired about her letter of May 8 concerning her application for
appointment to the Planning Commission.
Council and staff discussed a draft letter of understanding outlining a Baseball Stadium
lease amendment concerning placement of a new sign near Burden Blvd.
Council and staff discussed the cost of design standards for a new office building at the
Baseball Stadium.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:09 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Joyce Olson, Mayor Sandy Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk
PASSED and APPROVED this 2"d day of June, 2008.
3
CITY OF PASCO
Council Meeting of:
June 2, 2008
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We,the aLinstthe ere rtify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished,the
services re or perfo ed as described herein and that the claim is a just, due and unpaid
obligation nd that we re authorized to aut henticate and?1ai fm.
Gary Cru h r City T194P7 James W. 01 se, Finance Manager
We, the undersigned City Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County,Washington,
do hereby certify that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received; that Wire Transfer
No.s 4974 and 4976 in the amount of$98,030.24, have been authorized;that Check No.s 166089 through
166277 are approved for payment in the amount of$893,708.99, for a combined total of$991,739.23 on this
2nd day of June, 2008,
Councilmember Councilmember
SUMMARY OF CLAIMSNVIRE TRANSFERS BY FUND:
GENERAL FUND:
Legislative 998.82
Judicial 5,626.31
Executive 1,358.37
Police 195,089.85
Fire 4,479.43
Administration& Community Services 55,739.61
Community Development 38,661.52
Engineering 2,824.73
Non-Departmental 133,226.57
Library 92,235.94
TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 530,241.15
STREET 2,577.71
C_ D. BLOCK GRANT 843.48
KING COMMUNITY CENTER 990.33
AMBULANCE SERVICE 1,952.97
CEMETERY 8,844.53
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 1,263.10
SENIOR CENTER 2,980.60
MULTI MODAL FACILITY 1,473.98
RIVERSHORE TRAIL&MARINA MAIN 553.34
LITTER CONTROL 2,966.08
REVOLVING ABATEMENT 378.00
PARKS FUND 0.00
TRAC DEVELOPMENT 26,753.62
STADIUMICONVENTION CENTER 7,088.88
SUN WILLOWS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 0.00
METRO DRUG TASK FORCE 18,206.89
METRO DRUG FORFEITURE FUND 481.04
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 20,686.39
WATERISEWER 77,780.96
EQUIPMENT RENTAL- OPERATING 32,19938
EQUIPMENT RENTAL- REPLACEMENT 19,466.28
MEDICAUDENTAL INSURANCE 129,021.25
CENTRAL STORES 986.31
FIRE PENSIONS 25,129.21
PAYROLL CLEARING 35,922.87
TRI CITY ANIMAL CONTROL 42,950.48
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 991,739.23
3(b).1
CITY OF PASCO
Council Meeting of:
Payroll Approval June 2, 2008
The City Council
City of Pasco
Franklin County,Washington
The follo ing is a summary of payroll claims against the City of Pasco for the month of
May 2008 wh' are prese ith for your review and approval.
7 Ga D. t Manager James W. Ch Financial Services Manager
,the undersigned City Council members of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County,
Washington, do hereby certify that the services represented by the below expenditures have been received
and that payroll voucher No's. 37896 through 38013 and EFT deposit No's. 30023075 through 30023569
and City contributions in the aggregate amount of$1,735,405.94 are approved for payment on this
2nd day of June 2008.
Councilmember Councilmember
SUMMARY OF PAYROLL BY FUND
GENERAL FUND:
Legislative $ 6,683.50
Judicial 64,153.26
Executive 47,771.76
Police 516,156.91
Fire 260,738.66
Administrative & Community Services 243,425.80
Community Development 44,181.78
Engineering 75,912.62
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,259,024.29
CITY STREET 38,646.88
BLOCK GRANT 13,516.20
MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER 5,204.16
AMBULANCE SERVICE FUND 114,397.81
CEMETERY 8,523.85
ATHLETIC FUND 1,476.05
SENIOR CENTER 11,774.81
STADIUM OPERATIONS 486.11
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY 0.00
BOAT BASIN 31.89
REVOLVING ABATEMENT FUND 0.00
TASK FORCE 8,327.09
WATER/SEWER 250,504.84
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING 23,491.96
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 1,735,405.94
Payroll Summary
Net Payroll 831,306.60
Employee Deductions 502,574.30
Gross Payroll 1,333,880.90
City of Pasco Contributions 401,525.04
Total Payroll $ 1,735,405.94
3(b).2
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 20, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfi it Manager Workshop Mtg.: 5/27/08
Regular Mtg.: 6/2/08
FROM: Denis Austin, hief of Poli
SUBJECT: Interagency Agreement for Summer School Services
I. REFERENCE:
A. Proposed Interagency Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5/27:Discussion
6102:MOTION: I move to approve the Interagency Agreement with the Pasco School
District for summer school services and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the
agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Pasco School District Funds - S 7,480
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
School Resource Officers (SRO) are full-time uniformed police officers primarily
dedicated to providing law enforcement resource services to assigned schools and
surrounding neighborhoods. The School District has requested an extension of the SRO
services for the 2008 Summer School at Pasco High School. Normally, SRO services are
not provided during summer months. The School District has consolidated all summer
school programs at Pasco High School, which places a large number of students at one
school. As a proactive measure, the School District has requested SRO services for up to
eight hours each day of summer school. There are 23 summer school days from June 23`d
to July 24th. SRO's are assigned to work normal patrol duties when school is not in
session.
V. DISCUSSION:
The proposed Interagency Agreement is effective June through July 2008, and provides
one School Resource Officer for the 2008 Summer School. The School District will
reimburse the City for the salary and fringe benefits costs for one officer at the top salary
level for police officer for 168 hours during 23 summer school days. As evidence of their
inteption to move forward with the proposed Interagency Agreement the School District
has committed funds to reimburse the City for the wages and benefit costs for one School
Resource Officer.
3(c)
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
Between
Pasco School District No. 1
And
City of Pasco, Washington
This agreement, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW is made and entered into by and between the
Pasco School District No. 1, hereafter referred to as the "District" and the City of Pasco, a
municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereafter referred to as the"City."
It is the purpose of this agreement to:
1. Enhance the safety and security of students, teachers, staff, and visitors and provide
patrol of the various campuses of the District located within the City of Pasco,
Washington.
2. Provide for the presence of armed and uniforn-ied City Police Officers both inside and
outside the school buildings on selected campuses of the District during certain school
hours in support of such safety and security and the maintenance of a secure and peaceful
learning atmosphere.
3. Provide for prevention, intervention, and prompt effective enforcement by the City's
Police Department in situations involving, but not limited to:
a. Maintenance of order
b. Use, possession,or sale of illegal drugs and alcohol on school premises
C. Crimes against persons
d. Crimes against property
e. Any other situations or activities which require the intervention of law
enforcement officers; and
4. Provide for participation by police officers in the educational activities and role modeling
to foster and enhance knowledge of and respect for law enforcement and law
enforcement officers by students and the community.
5. Provide positive and supportive interface between law enforcement representatives and
the District's substance abuse and harassment prevention efforts including, but not
limited to Natural Helpers, Student Assistance Teams, Anti-Harassment and Bullying
Project and other intervention and prevention efforts by the District.
It is therefore mutually agreed that:
1. Statement of Work. The City shall furnish the necessary personnel and services and
otherwise do all things necessary for and incidental to the performance of the work stated herein.
The City shall:
a. Station a full-time uniformed police officer at Pasco High School for eight consecutive
hours each day from 07:30 AM to 3:30 PM during the 19 days when summer school is in
session from June 23rd through July 18"'. The uniformed officer will also be responsible
for responding to incidents at Ochoa and Stevens Middle Schools as needed during that
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No.1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 1 of 5
period. Beginning July 21" and continuing through July 24'h the uniformed officer will
be stationed at Ochoa and Stevens Middle Schools for a total of four consecutive hours
each day from 07:30 AM to 11:30 AM.
Office space shall be provided as available at each school for the use of the School
Resource Officer. Such office shall be equipped with one office desk and chair, and one
locking cabinet. The City shall provide a lockable cabinet capable of securing police
department equipment when not in use by the officer.
b. Cooperate with the District to provide training and education to each assigned
officer to insure effective communication and interrelation with the school
community and its students;
C. Cooperate with the District to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the
assigned officers and the program;
d. Meet as needed during the academic year with the District's representative (as
designated by the District) to evaluate the effectiveness of the program;
e. Cooperate with the District's representative to investigate and report on any
complaints regarding the conduct of an assigned officer, share fully, as permitted
by law, with the District's representative all results of such investigations for the
purpose of responding to each complaint and cooperate to resolve each complaint.
Provided, that it shall be the responsibility of the District to respond to any
complaint the District received from a student, parent or patron of the District and
communicate the results of any investigation to such person or persons.
2. Terms and Conditions. All rights and obligations of the parties to this agreement shall be
subject to and governed by the terms and conditions contained in the text of this agreement.
3. Period of Performance. Subject to its other provisions, the period of performance of this
agreement shall commence on June 23, 2008 and be completed on July 24, 2008 with July 4th
scheduled off, unless terminated sooner as provided herein.
The principal shall be responsible for notifying the Chief of the City's Police Department of the
school calendar, schedule of events and activities, and any changes in the same. The principal
shall determine the specific hours when an officer shall be present within the limits set forth in
Section l.a. of the Agreement.
4. Payment. The District shall reimburse the City for its expenses in employing one officer for
168 hours as follows:
a. For June 23,2008 through July 24, 2008, an estimated total of seven thousand
four hundred eighty dollars ($7,480).
Actual amount will be determined by the parties based upon any negotiated wage
increase between the City and the police officer's collective bargaining unit. The current
wage rate with benefits is $44.52.
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No.1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 2 of 5
5. Billing Procedure. The City shall submit a monthly invoice or billing statement to the
District. Payment shall be made to the City according to the regular procedures of the District.
6. Funding. If for any reason the District exhausts its budgeted funds for payment to the City
for its services described herein or funds from any expected funding source become unavailable,
the District shall notify the City and the obligations of the City shall immediately cease and this
agreement terminate, unless the district otherwise assumes the obligations for the payment of
services rendered by the Police Department.
7. Non-discrimination. In the performance of this agreement, the District and the City shall
comply with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 200d), Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC 7904) and Chapter 49.60 RCW, as now and
hereafter amended. Both shall not, except as they may be specifically allowed by laws to do so,
discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, marital status, age,
creed, Vietnam-Era and Disabled Veterans status, or the presence of any sensor, mental, or
physical handicap in:
a. Any terms or conditions of employment to include taking affirmative action
necessary to accomplish the objectives of this part; and
b. Denying an individual the opportunity to participate in any program provided by
this agreement through the provisions of services, delivery of services
contemplated by this agreement or otherwise afforded others hereunder.
In the event of non-compliance by either party or refusal to comply with the above provisions
this agreement may be rescinded, canceled, or terminated in whole or in part. The non-
complying party shall, however, be given a reasonable time in which to cure this non-
compliance. Any dispute may be resolved in accordance with the "Disputes"procedure set forth
herein.
8. Records Maintenance. The City shall maintain books, records, documents and other
evidence that sufficiently and effectively reflect all direct and indirect cost expended in the
performance of the services described herein. These records shall be subject to inspection,
review or audit by the personnel of both parties, other personnel authorized by either party, the
Office of the State Auditor and federal officers, if any, so authorized by law. The City and
District shall retain all books, records, documents, and other materials relevant to this agreement
for five (5) years after expiration. The office of the State Auditor, federal auditors, and any
persons authorized by the parties shall have full access and the right to examine any of these
materials during this five-year period.
9. Responsibilities and Authority of School Administrator. The principal or other
administrator designated by the District is responsible for the supervision and daily operations of
the school shall, subject to the lawful exercise of the officer's law enforcement responsibilities,
schedule, assign and direct the officer's duties under this agreement.
The principal is responsible for the investigation of non-criminal incidents that occur at or are
related to the school. If the principal finds that he or she or any individual is in physical danger,
the principal may request the law enforcement officer to assist him or her.
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No. 1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 3 of 5
In the case of a search of student property for the violation of District rules or other
administrative reasons, the school principal or designated administrator or District employee will
conduct the search. Once the principal has reason to believe that a crime has been or may be
committed, the principal or other designated administrator shall request the law enforcement
officer to assume responsibility.
The building administrator shall have the responsibility to contact and report to parents and
patrons regarding activities and findings of the law enforcement officer, where appropriate.
10. Indemnification. Each party shall defend, protect and hold harmless the other party from
and against all claims, suits and/or actions arising from any negligent or intentional act or
omission of that party's employees or agents while performing under this agreement.
11. Agreement Alterations and Amendments. The District and the City may mutually amend
this agreement. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by
the personnel authorized to bind the District and the City.
12. Termination. Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, either party may terminate
this agreement by providing sixty (60) days advance written notification to the other party of
their intent to terminate the agreement. If this agreement is so terminated, the terminating party
shall be liable only for performance, in accordance with the terms of this agreement for
performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination.
13. Savings. Should any portion of this agreement be declared illegal, the balance of the
agreement shall remain in full force and effect to carry out the purposes of this agreement.
14. Disputes. In the event that a dispute arises under this agreement, it shall be resolved in the
following manner: The Director of Educational Services of the District shall appoint a member to
the Dispute Board. The Pasco Chief of Police shall appoint a member to the Dispute Board. The
Director of Educational Services and the Pasco Chief of Police shall jointly appoint a third
member to the Dispute Board. That person shall act as chairperson, convene the Dispute Board
and cause a determination of the dispute, arrived at by a majority of the Board, to be rendered in
a timely manner. The determination of the Dispute Board shall be final and binding on the
District and the City.
15. Notices. Any notices required herein or related hereto shall be delivered in writing to the
District at:
Pasco School District No.1
Attn.: Cathy Osborn, Student Services Administrator
1215 West Lewis Street
Pasco,WA 99301
And to the City at: Pasco Police Department
Attn: Denis Austin, Chief of Police
525 North 3rd Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No. 1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 4 of 5
16. All Writings Contained Herein. This agreement contains all the terms and conditions
agreed to by the parties. No understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of
this agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties to this agreement.
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No. 1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 5 of 5
In Witness whereof, the parties have executed this agreement effective this day of
2008.
City of Pasco: Pasco School District No. 1
Joyce Olson William Leggett
Mayor President, Board of Education
Attest:
Debbie Clark Saundra L. Hill
City Clerk Superintendent
r
rry ayfield
Assistant Superintendent
Approved as to Form:
Leland Kerr Sarah Thornton
City Attorney School District Counsel
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No. 1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 6 of 5
2008 Summer School Cost Estimate 052008
PASO:H! Hl ,:.
Number of Officers
Hourly Rate with Benefits $ 44.52
Total Hourly Rate $ 44.52
Number of Hours Each School Day 8
Number of School Days 19
Total Number of Officer Hours 152
Estimated Cost - PHSgq
Number of Officers
Hourly Rate with Benefits $ 44.52
Total Hourly Rate $ 44.52
Number of Hours Each School Day 4
Number of School Days 4
Total Number of Officer Hours 16
stimated Cost - Middle Schools
1.f .
T 3'A ..0 fi Ft R SUMMER.:-sckl t - tQ► .: . :...
T:1.47S.36r.
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 22, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfi Manager Workshop Mtg.: 5/27/08
FROM: Lynne Jackson, Human Resources Manager Regular Mtg.: 6102/08
SUBJECT: Bargaining Contract with IAFF, Local 1433
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Collective Bargaining Agreement (Council packets only; copy in Human Resources
Office and Pasco Public Library for public review)
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5127: DISCUSSION
6/02: MOTION: I move to approve the Collective Bargaining Agreement with the IAFF,
Local # 1433 and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Increases average annual cost of fire operations (base wages and benefits) by approximately
$151,760
Fire operations cost (base wages and benefits) for 2006 (last year of previous contract):
$3,294,236
Anticipated Fire operations cost(base wages and benefits) for 2008: $3,597,756
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The previous contract terminated December 31, 2006.
V. DISCUSSION: Negotiations commenced in October 2006 and the parties, through the use of state
sponsored mediator, reached a tentative agreement on March 28, 2008. Local 1433 members
recently voted to ratify the tentative agreement. Following are the significant changes reflected in
the new agreement:
• Effective January 1, 2007: 4% increase for all represented employees
Added a 25-year longevity step at 5%
Effective January 1, 2008: 3.5% COLA (100%b/c west cities, CPI-U, October/October),
2.5%minimum/4%maximum; plus
1% wage adjustment
Effective January 1, 2009: 100% b/c west cities, CPI-U, October/October), 2.5% minimum/
4% maximum.
Effective January 1, 2010: 100% b/c west cities, CPI-U, October/October), 2.5% minimum/
4% maximum
• As of 711/08 Firefighter insurance premium participation to increase (from 1%) to 1.5% of the
top step fire fighter wage; thus premium participation increases from $50.03/month to
$81.54/month
• Eliminate option to use one-half of holiday hours (up to 66 hours/year) as paid time off in
favor of full cash out of all holiday hours. (Potential avoidance of up to 3,168 hours of
overtime.)
• Move physical fitness from Pasco High School gym to in-station physical fitness.
o Allows for quicker response time for emergencies.
o Savings on not driving fire vehicles to Pasco HS for physical fitness.
• Allow use of short term disability benefit to buy back sick leave(financed by bargaining unit).
Staff recommends Council ratification of the Agreement
3(d)
AGENDA REPORT NO. 21
FOR: City Council DATE: 5/28108
TO: Gary Crutchfi 1 Manager WORKSHOP:
REGULAR: 6/2/08
FROM: David 1. McDonald, City Plann
SUBJECT: FINAL PLAT: Three Rivers Crossing Phase 5 (Hayden Homes) (MF # FP08-
005)
I. REFERENCEN:
A. Final Plat (Council Packets only-Copy available in Planning Office, the Pasco
Library or on the City's web page at www.pasco-wa_gov for public review)
B. Vicinity Map
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve the final plat for Three Rivers Crossing Phase 5.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. The City Council previously approved a preliminary plat for the Three Rivers
Crossing development. The developer is now seeking final plat approval for Phase 5.
B. Three Rivers Crossing is located north of Sandifur Parkway west of Convention
Drive.
V. DISCUSSION:
Prior to the approval of a final plat, the developer is to either install all infrastructures or
post a bond or other instrument that secures the financing for the improvements. In this
case, the developer has completed the sewer and water utilities and has provided the City
with a bond in an amount sufficient ($1,000,000.00) to cover the costs of the outstanding
improvements.
The final plat shows and contains information on primary control points, tract boundaries,
dimensions, bearings, lot numbers and other necessary engineering data. In addition, the
plat contains the required descriptions, dedications and acknowledgment, and approval
sections.
VI. ADMINISTRATIVE ROUTING:
3(e)
r
;3-
r.
�`<'�'`� �i'Y-R'a. - ""-.:!k',`; `4-, ,'• ,'ft's ;. .'t i.�." �_.
7, R 7
4'a. ,� � � r • r � � .
:dF
SN. •�
•i ��I:
do
VX
� S. .�`�n•�;:�`•`„ ,fit:t;µ �' s3 M�. '"3 ;''•`'?'.� �'
Jr, v{y
�Al.
y;
f i fury
t 1� ..a3 '. i.' t �c•�
in. s v
a t' x 'd ..• .i 17
i. F •" .•�
to „I"
n
r s Y 'y4j.i
ILI
--— --— ------ ---— # ''s :u I-
v .
PREPARED BY:
MINISTER AND GLAESER
SURVEYING, INC. I I I 100.00' 111000
N 65 0
6303 BURDEN BLVD., UITE E I v, I o ° 7,200 SF ° THREE RIVERS' CROSSING
PASCO, WA 99301 I I 1 o I 48 w n°'i U' 49 o.l
(509) 544-7802 s 88.26'04" W I I .,1 25 0 35 I� a 1 7,100 SF (,:p. 0 5,000 SF J CITY OF PASCO REQUIRED NOTES
• 100.00' 7,,Da SF o 7,100 SF .N PHASE 5 ci
v I I m 30.00' 30.00' A) ADDRESSES WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF PASCO WHEN BUILDING
I
PERMITS ARE ISSUED.
I 1 1 �' 1 30.00' 30,00' I 100.00' - (100.00') % - I (100.00*)
8*26'0') ` A SUBDIVISION IN A PORTION OF THE
1 I B) THE INDIVIDUAL OR COMPANY MAKING IMPROVEMENTS ON A LOT OR LOTS W 2 OF THE N W 1 4
0o I o N 88'26'04" E ^^ S 88'26'04" W) I (60.00') (S 88'26'04" W) /
o J • (160.00) ao ( I I
0 8,000 SF Ig J 100.00' �' (100.00') I S 88'26'04" W) o (s 88'49'4x" w) OF THIS PLAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND INSTALLING ALL
S 88'26'04" W I �'' � ( 17 I 1 35 36 TRENCH, CONDUIT, PRIMARY VAULTS, SECONDARY JUNCTION BOXES, AND
01 I 1 14 I N ° I I I BACKFILL FOR THE PUD'S PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DISTRIBUTION OF SECTION 10
TI N SYSTEM
1 I �I 26 1 I I w I 1 16 °:- — — — I I 1 1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUD SPECIFICATIONS; SAID INDIVIDUAL OR COMPANY
SEE NOTE 3 40' " I 7,100 SF o i 1 rn T. 9 N•, R. 29 E., W.M.
• s 88'26 04 W • 01 c I a I ,� 1 I I I I SHEET 2 WILL MAKE FULL ADVANCE PAYMENT OF LINE EXTENSION FEES AND WILL
100.00 I I v I I =---��ATCH LINE PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY UTILITY EASEMENTS PRIOR TO PUD CONSTRUCTION CITY OF PASCO
SHEET 2 SHEET 3 AND\OR CONNECTION OF ANY ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO OR WITHIN THE PLAT.
MATCH LINE I -- N 88.26'x4" E - - - 1_._I 1 - - - — -� 18 I I �1 FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SHEET 3 0 l 7,000 SF I g •
100.00 I "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2° I I J 34 C) LOTS 16, 17, 20, 21, 39, 40, 43, 44, 55, 56, 60 AND 61 PRESENT JOB NUMBER: 08-090 MAY 29, 2008
` 01 1 SEE NOTE 7-a{ I I (VOL. D, PG. 290) -- ---� I 37 DIFFICULTIES FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FENCING OR OTHER SIGHT/ ACCESS
1 cn I�--SEE NOTE 2 J REC. 04-28-2005 I
OBSTRUCTIONS. FENCING SHALL NOT ENCROACH OR INHIBIT ACCESS TO ANY SHEET 3 OF 3
15 SEE NOTE 7-°I --SEE NOTE 7
SEE NOTE 2-�-I o o ;I 27 2 I 1 I� I I CITY UTILITIES FOR ANY LOTS WITHIN THIS PLAT.
S 88'26'04" w I s w o I 7,100 SF °0 1 �-SEE NOTE 7 1 19 J
• 100.00' °P �% SEE NOTE 4-1-1 30' I '
i I SEE NOTE 4_ -� 30' 30 �-� — — — — — _ D) THE DEVELOPER/BUILDER SHALL PAY THE CITY OF PASCO A COMMON
I • ' I I — — 1 AREA MAINTENANCE FEE" OF $375.00 PER LOT UPON ISSUANCE OF z
— — — — — BUILDING PERMITS FOR HOMES. p w w
Jo i 10 i I N 88'26'04" E I� �I — I
of 7,000 SF o • 100.00' I I I I E THE DEVELOPER BUILDER SHALL PAY THE CITY OF PASCO A "TRAFFIC z = cD F-
lo I I I I 20 i I I 33 I 38 ) "/ = c°n z m Z o
I I I I I I 1 MITIGATION FEE OF ,$150.00 PER LOT UPON ISSUANCE OF BUILDING Q " p v
I 28 3 I 14 I I I I PERMITS FOR HOMES . 3: m Q ¢ w �¢
S 88'26'04" W I I I
• 7,100 SF � Y Z
t-4
100.00' - - - F) LOTS ABUTTING CONVENTION DRIVE DO NOT HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO �} a 1 I I { — CONVENTION DRIVE. r� ( o a w v•°o° 1 N 88'26'04" E J I - - 21 I N z �'
N 9 I P • — — I� �I _ I I I G) AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED OVER, UNDER AND UPON THE FIRST 10 Q Q ;t o 0
o I 7,000 SF J o I 100.00 1 I I r� I FEET OF ALL LOTS ADJACENT TO ALL STREETS FOR THE INSTALLATION, z o ago o z
I 32 46 CONSTRUCTION, RENEWING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING NATURAL GAS, o z o m
En <i J v I J I 13 ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND TV CABLE.
O zp Nz �
• S 88'26'04" W I • o f 7,10 9 SF p 4 I I I I I 2 2 I I I I THE a w ui O o o 0
100.00 I I ., S I I H) DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL AWALL/FENCE ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY w z w °rte
1 I I I Z �I — OF CONVENTION DRIVE. THE CITY MAY MAKE REPAIRS OR REPLACE THE m Q w P `f' `o
J SEE NOTE 1 1 30' 1 30' I I UC 1 1 `^ — _`- —
(n Z N Lo
O J {,.1 WALL/FENCE AS NEEDED. PROPERTY OWNERS ADJOINING SAID WALL/FENCE 0 d- �-=i w co 0
i N 88'26'04" E — I—j — — --
i 7,0080 sr 10 • 100.00' — I� I I I I I ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH N W w�_ � �
0 o I I r 11 i o ( MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND UPKEEP OF THE WALL/FENCE. Q< o z zo o �
J
°-I I • I D I 12 I w I I 31 47 Mw Nom oo
i " 1 41 I j ° I I o m ( I 23 1 I � I NOTES
S 88.26 04 w • o 30 5 I w I 1 I N I I s
• 7,100 SF g I
100.00' I ]s o l .. J 1 I J I 1 ____ ____ — �- v I 1) 60' R/W DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF PASCO. 50 25 0 50 75 100
J I m 1 I m o0 I — — — _ 1 I }--1 — — — m SCALE 1 INCH = 50 FEET
" 1 ° — 1 - I ��i2 2) 10 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT.
7 i o r:. N 88'26 04 E — I v J 2 4 �' I m<
of 7,000 SF 1 o I ("' • 1 100.00' rn �I rn I I I 1 I N I I O!?
'I ( _ r- i o I o I I I 30 0-° 48 3) 40 R/W DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF PASCO. LEGEND
Z I -4 I I `A I � — ='0 ° ■ INDICATES FOUND AND HELD 3" BRASS CAP IN
i J 31 6 11 ° � „
1 J I I 1 ' 0 4) EXISTING 60 R/W PER THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2 (D-290). CONCRETE WITH CASE AND COVER AS SET IN
�, s s 88'26'04" w I . m o f 7,100 SF g I v i I I I I I o N Z
� o x I 100.00 I o I .. I I I 25 I I 4 � 5) EXISTING 30' R/W PER "SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7" (D-209). "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" (VOL. D, PG. 269)
rri N) m TIED 01-19-05
m ° o i 1-4 j 1 I I �J — —. —
M a -4 01 6 i o N 88'26'04" E — __ �I I I Y 6) EXISTING 60 R/W PER THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1 (D-269). ( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA FROM "THREE RIVERS CROSSING,
C(n I — — — I I 7) EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT PER "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2" D-290 . PHASE 1" (VOL. D, PG. 269) TIED 01-19-05
O o 1 7,000 SF 0 • I 100.00 I 11 -- J--i I ( )
0 i 1 1 I 1 2 9 �,
'= i I -- I I 10 { I 49 El INDICATES 3 BRASS CAP IN CONCRETE
I _ I I I 26 1 I I 8) EXISTING 10 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1 (D-269). WITH CASE AND COVER SET
Z Z • I S 88'26'04" W • J' I 7,100 SF o 7 I 1 I
�. I
Z J I I I I 9) EXISTING 40' R/W PER "SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7" (D-209). INDICATES FOUND AND HELD 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH
1 00.00 0 l ° I I
1 1 v I — — — — -- — PLASTIC CAP STAMPED BETHJ
E 38490 FOUND, AS SET IN
Z 1 " I� r--� — — — — 1 I �I 10) EXISTING 40' R/W PER "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" (D-269). "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" (VOL. D, PG. 269)
01 7,000 SF 1 o • I N Sao 6000, E E 2 I I TIED 01-19-05
"THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHAS 11) R/W DEDICATED TO CITY OF PASCO, WIDTH VARIES.
o I 1 I (VOL. D, PG. 290) I 27 I { 2g sU INDICATES 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC
I 1 1 REC. 04-28-2005 9
S 88'2Woe w 33 8 , I 1 I I 50 12) PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, SEE DETAIL "A". CAP STAMPED "CALVIN 43609" SET
• 100.00' J • 01 7,100 SF o 1 I J
1 J o I I I i I J • INDICATES FOUND AND HELD 5/8" WITH YPC STAMPED "
{o--SEE NOTE 2 1 Im-SEE NOTE 2 1 1 --- — SURVEY REFERENCE
SHEA 33656 PER THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2
(VOL. D, PG. 290)
01 q' I P J I 1) THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1 VOLUME "D", PAGE 269
7,0 4 SF o I • 1 N 88'26'04" E 1
" p l I c 1 100.00 1 1 I I
INDICATES FOUND AND HELD 5 8" WITH YPC STAMPED
2) SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7 VOLUME "D", PAGE 209 /
•1 SEE NOTE 2-p-J 91I m m "THREE RIVERS CROSS{NG PHASE 1' I I 1 52 51 3) SHORT PLAT BOOK 94, PAGE 12 " 33656" PER "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1"
I z 55 (VOL. D, PG. 269) 54 53 I
i S 88'26'04" w 1 34 REC. 08-11-2004 ` " " (VOL. D, PG. 269)
•
• 6,997 SF ° ° N t l I 4) THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2 VOLUME "D", PAGE 290
J 100.00 I v ' ' I - INDICATES FOUND AND HELD 5/8" WITH YPC STAMPED
• ^ — — _ — — _ _ — _ _ _ — — \ ____ __�__ — _ DEED REFERENCE " " „
- / o — — BETHJE 38490 PER SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7
I 3 GRANTOR: KENNETH G. SMITH (VOL. D, PG. 209)
SEE NOTE 3
I 6,601 SF � — .°: GRANTEE: HAYDEN ENTERPRISES, INC.
o I • �'' o - (74'69 AF NO: 1615268 AF AUDITORS FILE
41 1 N o C22 S 87 42 03 W (N 87'42'03" E 260.02) - PREUMINARY�, DATED: NOVEMBER 28, 2002 NO NUMBER
�9
J `' (N 87'42'03" E 204.31') PG. PAGE
ENZIAN FALLS DRIVE CITY OF PASCO VERTICAL ROS RECORD OF SURVEY
2 � M S 1705'56" W — — -- --- —
• I
9,017 SF / C� , (60.00') } — __ — — — _ �^ _ _ _ _ _— — -- —_— — — — DATUM REFERENCE R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
- - - - - - - PSI #16-1
REC. RECORDED
SEE DETAIL / '� Fti 3" BRA SF SQUARE FEET
I "A"
, I I SS CAP AT THE INTERSECTION OF SANDIFUR
1 A o� 7,829 SF�TF I I I 10 PARKWAY & ROAD 68, ELEVATION BEING 513.15, �� VOL. VOLUME
-I ono I m I I I 8 I 9 CITY OF PASCO DATUM ���' C24 YPC YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
%K '��� = 0 I w 4 0 I 5 I 6 7 3 N�
-\ 3 m I I I x
• i� ° 1 m I 2
� o m I �
0 0 •`'� o� z z I 2
Z `^. y� o0 I I I ° m I I 10 I 9,017 SF
m I - - - -
�� vV) o I 1 - - - - - - I - - _ - - - ` -" - - - - SEARCHED FOR USBR MONUMENT 1 SEE A'.C*<Q
i I I —� ----� (NOT FOUND). HELD CALCULATED I"—NOTE 2 ��� / �'� �j�, ^p1 of wAS..
N 88'2035, W
�",'.
• C23 67.23' " - -- --- _.._ ._.. -�- -- _-- - - .._._ - - - � ----- `. - _,_._ �.�1 — — — — — POSITION AS SHOWN IN "THREE
• 1---- -
___ RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1' (D-269) I �
S- (146.53') S 24'14'59" W "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1"
N °o / 7,829 SF
S 8742'04" W (VOL. D, PG. 269) o — rn ` / o�
(7.06') REC. 08-11-2004 — o o
co Jc \ /���0 S T
_ --- m Lo
"SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7" CALCULATED POSITION OF THE — — — _ ___. — — `
iv (VOL. D, PG. 209) $ CENTER OF SECTION 10 C25 EXPIRES:
vo' cn SANDIFUR PARKWAY REC. 06-20-2002 AS SHOWN IN "THREE RIVERS
— '- — — CROSSING PHASE 1" (D-269) DETAIL "A"
m — — — NOT TO SCALE
o �, — -�- — -- --- ---�_" 1____ 40 39 I 38 I 37 I 36 10
�' 43 I 42 I 41 I I AUDITORS CERTIFICATE
0 q.5 44 �
FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF 200_AT MINUTES PAST _.M., AND
N 8742'03" E 2621.53'
CURVE TABLE
Fg- 9 10 CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD CHORD BEARING RECORDED IN VOLUME_OF PLATS PAGE AT THE REQUEST MINISTER AND GLAESER
Ct 68.48' 55.00' 71'20'08" 64.14' S 37'14 00 E SURVEYING, INC.
FOUND AND HELD IRON PIPE WITH 2 1/2" BRASS CAP ' "
STAMPED: "USBR" AS THE WEST 1/4 OF SECTION 10. C2 38.54' 85.00' 25'58'38" 38.21' S 59'54'45" E
(TIED 7-17-02) C4 42.91' 45.00' 54'37'46" 418.30' S 28'52'50" E
2 LINE TABLE C5 28.08' 85.00' 18.55'37" 27.95' S 11.01'45" E FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR
C12 39.59 25.00 9044 00 35.58 S 46'55 57 E INDEX NO.
LINE LENGTH BEARING
L1 15.93' S 43'04'04" W
C21 18.62' 55.00' 19'23'53" 18.53' S 82'36'00" E
t` L2 5.00' N 4655'56" W
MINISTER AND GLAESER SURVEYING, INC. MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO MATTERS OF C22 8.46' 25.00' 19.23'02" 8.42' S 82.36'26" E
C23 25.25' 45.00' 32'08'55" 24.92' S 72'16'10" E
UNWRITTEN TITLE SUCH AS ADVERSE POSSESSION, ACQUIESCENCE, ESTOPPEL, ETC. c24 5.00' 85.00' 3'22'2x" 5..92 N 45'14'16" W
ALL CORNERS NOTED AS FOUND WERE VISITED ON 07-17-02
FEE NO.
C25 10.03' 45.00' 12'46'30" 10.01' N 49'48'28" W
DWG FILE: 08090-DWG DRAWN BY: JAG,CTP CALC BY: JJS
`.
i J;
PREPARED BY:
MINISTER AND GLAESER
SURVEYING, INC.
6303 BURDEN BLVD., SUITE E
t PASCO, WA 99301
(509) 544-7802
THREE_ RIVERS C.R D SSINC
FOUND IRON PIPE WITH 2 1/2 BRASS CAP STAMPED:
"USBR", DISTURBED, HELD CALCULATED POSITION AS SHOWN
"r "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" (D--269) PHA SE 5
4 41N
N 88'11'14" E 2663.24' 3 CITY OF PASCO REQUIRED NOTES A SUBDIVISION IN A PORTION OF THE
9i X10 10 A) ADDRESSES WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF PASCO WHEN BUILDING W 1 /2 OF THE N W 1 /4 SEARCHED FOR USBR MONUMENT PERMITS ARE ISSUED.
(NOT FOUND). FIELD CALCULATED OF SECTION 10
POSITION AS SHOWN IN "THREE B) THE INDIVIDUAL OR COMPANY MAKING IMPROVEMENTS ON A LOT OR LOTS T. 9
166 RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" (D-269) v, OF THIS PLAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND I N, R. 29 INSTALLING ALL E., W.M.,
�\S ,?4 o TRENCH, CONDUIT, PRIMARY VAULTS, SECONDARY JUNCTION BOXES, AND CITY OF P
N ���� Z co o BACKFILL FOR THE PUD'S PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM PASCO
IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUD SPECIFICATIONS; SAID INDIVIDUAL OR COMPAN FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
N GT
N ON
^� ° WILL MAKE FULL ADVANCE PAYMENT OF LINE EXTENSION
- m FEES AND WILL JOB NUMBER: 08-090 MAY 29
'Tr W W W PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY UTILITY EASEMENTS PRIOR TO PUD CONSTRUCTION 2008
� w ' � CALCULATED POSITION OF THE
0o - cn = „ -� AND OR CONNECTION OF ANY ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO OR WITHIN THE PLAT. SHEET 2 OF 3
N 88'26 04' E v, _ v N N 88'26 04 E o AS SHOWN IN OF
THREE TRIVERSO \
#` 170.00' cO-m ra = N 8826'04" E °' •' 130.00' • e ' ' " "40.00' 100.00' ® 30.00' - N 88'26'04" E 260.00' 130.00' 100.00' 130.00' _ CROSSING PHASE 1" (D-269) C) LOTS 16, 17, 20, 21, 39, 40, 43, 44, 55, 56, 60 AND 61 PRESENT
, • ' ' , 30.00 • DIFFICULTIES FOR THE PLACE 1 30.00 100.00 100.00' 30.00', 30.00 100.00' . 100.00 , MENT OF FENCING OR OTHER SIGHT/ ACCESS
z I0 OBSTRUCTIONS. FENCING SHALL NOT ENCROACH OR INHIBIT ACCESS TO ANY
{ SEE NOTE 1 30' 30' I I 58 I 10
SEE NOTE 3 °� o �' ° 0 5,000 SF I o CITY UTILITIES FOR ANY LOTS WITHIN THIS PLAT. z
w co 1 8 I . 1 o SEE NOTE 1 30' 30' a I z w
Ln co ° j v w ' S 88'26'04 W I ° w
I 7,000 SF I o I 19 w 41 I I 42 100.00' '' 59 N p) THE DEVELOPER/BUILDER SHALL PAY THE CITY OF PASCO A "COMMON ~ ~
• I I o I 7,100 SF 0 7,100 SF I q o I 7,100 SF ,°• • cn o l 7,200 SF oo J
AREA MAINTENANCE FEE OF 375.00 PER LOT UPON ISSUANCE OF
• � � I z ca
0• 1 -SEE NOTE 2 I -SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 1 30' ° 30' -� BUILDING PERMITS FOR HOMES. m Q O
;: • S 88'26.04" W • �;, SEE NOTE 2--� v� v,
w I I I 57 ° �' I Q J >-
99.91 v; S 88.26'04" W S 88.26'04" W v) S 88'26'04" W ° l 0 c" S 88'26'04" W o Q w Q
5,000 SF w < ° w
., • ® • ® ® ® 100.00' • E) THE DEVELOPER/BUILDER SHALL PAY THE CITY OF PASCO A "TRAFFIC
cn ' SEE NOTE 2 100.00 100.00 -�° I 100.00 SEE NOTE 2--� I MITIGATION FEE OF 150.00 PER LOT UPON IS >- z w
m v
{ o f w :I°'w s 88'2x'04" w I { ISSUANCE OF BUILDING �� w w
` 17 I • I I �' N W cl I w z ® • I �I PERMITS FOR HOMES". r� � �r Q j
7,869 SF ^' co 00 ° rn o rn `° rn 00.u' o rn 100.00 °° °D 60 F LOTS ABUTTING 03 0
P I m rn I �' I rn o W °, �1 7,226 SF w
0D � 20 � 40 ° z 43 I � N
.,. cp P vi Z Q
_ I � - I z 7,368 SF w 0 7,328 SF I - -I o 7,368 SF w;' S6 I v -I� ) CONVENTION DRIVE DO NOT HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO `t z DD o w
m 5" E o N -� w c„ rn SEE NOTE 2 w
Aq3 ® e m _ y m • • N n� co CONVENTION DRIVE. z _ r _ v
^' L o 5,554 SF J • • l p 000 z
-' R - m oo _ _ _ _ )
f G,�� �r9 G AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED OVER, UNDER AND UPON THE FIRST 10 z o �- V) -
- V) -
f z
N°. G ° - - - - - - - - - 74.89' FEET OF ALL LOTS ADJACENT TO ALL STREETS FOR THE INSTALLATION Q w �` ° o
Nil! C8 e 39.96' e ® 74.89' ® 75.11' ® ® 74.89 • 75.11' ® •
z w CONSTRUCTION, RENEWING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING NATURAL GAS, m z �'' d LLJ o THREE RIVERS DRIVE o ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND TV CABLE. LL_
Q _z z N Lb Lb
° a- Jw oo
,3 S 88'11 i 5 W S 8811'15"� W � I-.( _._ S 88'11 15" W �.a S $$71 15 W ® � �
- _ - _ _. y - H) THE DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL A WALL/FENCE ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY Z z u� rn
170.00' 2x0.00 2x0.00' 130.00' OF CONVENTION DRIVE. THE CITY MAY MAKE REPAIRS OR REPLACE THE
o WALL/FENCE AS NEEDED. PROPERTY OWNERS ADJOINING SAID WALL FENCE a ~ o w o b
o ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF ALL COSTS AS WALL/FENCE NOM o
• o • ® ® • • ® ® ® ASSOCIATED WITH
_ _ 74.89 75.11 MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND UPKEEP OF THE WALL/FENCE.
6 40.04 75.11 74.89' �, 75.11 �, �G - - - - - - -
r ; RB_S 49 30 42n • o ( V' - • • o o_ 55 1 • • �, o N 0 50 25 0 50 75 100
I E 1 I o_ ' ° (A TES SCALE 1 INCH = 50 FEET
Fri C. 5,501 SF 61
w ( SEE NOTE 1 30' 30' I 21 N W z SEE NOTE 1 30' 30' z 44 w p o I I 6,814 SF W
°I 1 rn 1 8,139 SF `c° a I cn cr 1 0� 7,919 SF �;w I I ��� 0�1 1) 60' R/W DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF PASCO. LEGEND
M c 16 ° v I - � 39 U' m S 88'26'04" W rn =
N1 1 7,799 SF I w rn N 8,180 SF I rn ?I K) m • o .I m F��t�Q
o rn I -I `I
�j. I I 100.00 I c I N as'2s'o4" E ��� 2) 10 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT. „
INDICATES FOUND AND HELD 3 BRASS CAP IN
z I I I I I s as 2x'04" w o 54 I ® I 100.00' ® CONCRETE WITH CASE AND COVER AS SET IN
N 88'2x'04" E N sa'2s'o4" E • • 3 40 R/W DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF PASCO. "THREE RIVERS CROSSING "
�.: S 88.26 04 W ® • ® 100.00' 0 5,000 SF 1 o I �, )
1 °- I °- I °' SSING PHASE 1 (VOL. D, PG. 269
98.05' ® 1 100.00' 100.00' I � )
20.40' I� SEE NOTE 2 U) SEE NOTE 2-�I SEE NOTE 2 cn S 88'26 04 W I N I 62 N o° ) / "THREE 01-19-05
„ ..r v o 4 EXISTING 60 R W PER THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2" (D-290)•
cn
'.iF' • SEE NOTE 2-�-I 1 a o • • ° --ii 0 7,200 SF o
1 I 6 I 45 100.00 { `v o I = 5) EXISTING 30' R/W PER "SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7" p- ( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA FROM "THREE RIVERS CROSSING,
I � 22 c:, 38 209). PHASE 1" D P
15 0 0I 7,100 SF 7,100 SF Ia D oI 7,100 SF w o I �, v�7 SEE NOTE 2 ( (VOL.( G. 269) TIED 01-19-05
C7 1
7,980 SF I°o °_1 - I - U) I C o SEE NOTE 2--1 ° I
° 53 6) EXISTING 60 R/W PER "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" (D-269). INDICATES 3" BRASS CAP IN CONCRETE
Z I 1 - I m I c,W,- O I m o 5,000 SF I o �' ® N Sa'26'04" E /
.I I " r � C S 88-26'04- w 100.00
WITH CASE AND COVER SET
I ® ® O S 88'26'04" W Z ) '
C N 88'26 04 E N 88'26 04" E I • 7 EXISTING 10 UTILITY EASEMENT PER THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2" (D-290), INDICATES FOUND A
" 100.00' 100.00 I D I m I ND HELD 5 8
E. �1 I r m 100.00' • �+
100.00 / " X 30" IRON ROD WITH
,.H. Z s 88'2x'04 w I 1 I r I �, I N I 63 8) EXISTING 10' UTILITY EASEMENT PER "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "BETHJE 38490" FOUND A
• ® I S SET IN
100.00' I PHASE 1" (D-269). "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" (VOL. D PG. 2
O 1 I o I J I ° 0 52 l a o 1 7,200 SF o
Z � w 46 (A ° 5,000 SF o o ° 9 'SUNNY 01-19-05 69)
D I 23 c.w 37 1-' -D Z oI 7,100 SF �' o o I °I ) EXISTING 40 R/W PER SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7" D-209 .
I X 0 I 7,100 SF a (It 7,100 SF 0 ;' m 01 cn o SEE NOTE 1 30' 30' ( )
_ n �• INDICATES 5/8" X 30" IRON ROD WITH PLASTIC
%� o I 14 i o I a { �' I ® S 88.2x'04" w e i 10) EXISTING 40 R/W PER THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" �>
0 < 0 8,000 SF t o �.� I N 88'26 04 E
rat o 1 o F I I 1 100.00 I ® ® (D-269). CAP STAMPED CALVIN 43609" SET
s 88'2x'04' w 100.00' INDICATES FOUND AND HELD 5
i. �; I • N ss•2s o4 E ® N as•2s o4' E • • • 1 �, I 11) R/W DEDICATED TO CITY OF PASCO, WIDTH VARIES. •
100.00 51 0 „
/8 WITH YPC STAMPED
ioo.00' 100.00 2 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT, SEE DETAIL "A". "SHEA 33656" PER "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2"
= w D I I I o x,000 Si-= t o j 64 U) 0 m e l S 88'26'04" W l e m I 0 I I O °- t o N N ) (VOL,( D PG. 290)
W 100.00 1 j 24 1 w 36 I, V I 47 W e s 88.26'04" w I • 01 7.200 SF o �( INDICATES FOUND
Ny. SEE NOTE 2 0 7,100 SF 0 w 7,100 SF 10 01 7,100 SF �, 0 100.00' I I
ND AND HELD 5/8" WITH YPC STAMPED
F 1 j 1 {Q I o I c I SURVEY REFERENCE "SHEA 33656" PER "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1
F..t•... .t: 001 0o I m I `'' 0 50 I •° I N 88.26'04". E
VOL. D, PG. 269)
' 13 I 5,000 sr- o
of 8,000 SF I'o I I s sa'2s'o4" w { ° • I 100.00' • 1) THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1 VOLUME "D", PAGE 269
0 t o N 88'26'04" E N 88'26'04" E I • I 100.00' �•
°i ® • • I 1 2) SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7 VOLUME "D", PAGE 209 INDICATES FOUND AND HELD 5/8" WITH YPC STAMPED
100.00' 100.00 S 88'26'04" W
I I cn I I c ® 100.00' • I 3) SHORT PLAT BOOK 94, PAGE 12 BETHJE 38490 PER SUNNY MEADOWS PHASE 7"
I I I o I 1; I 65 ryv 4) THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2 VOLUME "D", PAGE 290 (VOL. D, PG. 209)
e S 88'26'04" W I ® I v l 25 �' w 35 �' 1 48 W N cn 49 14 0 l 7,200 SF o
100.00 0 1 7,100 SF o �'_ 7,100 SF l0 0 7,100 SF �N o 5,000 SF o AF AUDITORS FILE
° Io -I x o l o I DEED REFERENCE NO NUMBER
I I m , I I GRANTOR: KENNETH G. SMITH
1 1 1 I 30.00 30.00' PG. PAGE
00 1 O I N ss•2s'o4" E 30.00' 30.00' 100.00' - (100.00') r - (100.00') GRANTEE: HAYDEN ENTERPRISES, INC. ROS RECORD OF SURVEY
T 018,00 SF I g (100.00' - (S 88'26 04 W) (60.00') S 88'26'04" W)
® 1x0.00') " I I AF N0: 1615268
1 100.00 �" ) ( oo cn I I
I w I (s ss•2s'o4" w) 0 17 I (s as•49'4s" w) i ( DATED: NOVEMBER 28, 2002 R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY
S 88'26'04' W o0
=Y 1 I I N o 1 I �%c:, 35 36 REC. RECORDED
y� SEE NOTE 3 40' r I 26 I `� c'' I I I I I I CITY OF PASCO VERTICAL
• s asop Ao,' w • o 7,100 SF a I V 16 °�- - - - i- I DATUM REFERENCE VOL. VOLUME FEET
SHEET 2 I I I .. I I v , I I `� 1 I I I SHEET 2 PSI 16-1 YPC YELLOW PLASTIC CAP
MATCH LINE ATCH LINE >� #
o o • n - - - -- I - - 8 I T - - I SHEET 3 3 BRASS CAP AT THE INTERSECTION OF SANDIFUR
SHEET 3 y 1 11 I � N ss•2s o4 E I -- I I
o 1 7,000 SF 1 a 1 100.00' I i "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2" I I PARKWAY & ROAD 68, ELEVATION BEING 513.15,
- I I I I CITY OF PASCO DATUM
I 1 - Ia-SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 7-- I (VOL. D, PG. 290) - -1 34
SEE NOTE 2-�1 I REC. 04-28-2005 I I I 37
o :I 27 1 5 SEE NOTE 7 SEE NOTE 7 •A�•..C*Ql
I °F Eqs .. It
4 : ® S 88.26'04" W l e ° w o f 7,100 SF o 2 1 SEE NOTE 7
100,00' o c ° o r- I 19 I I r .1
I SEE NOTE 4-L 30' 0'
y coo`
1 m I I I I SEE NOTE 4 30' 30'
EXPIRES:
CURVE TABLE
CURVE LENGTH RADIUS DELTA CHORD CHORD BEARING
C6 29.14' 35.00' 47'41'58" 28.30' ' 'NARY C7 39.38' 25.00' 90'14'48" 35.43' N 46'41'21" w AUDITORS CERTIFICATE
C8 29.66' 35.00'
33 20 28.7
8 S 67 32
C9 39.16' 25.00' 89°45'12" 35.28' N 43'18'309" E FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF
C10 39.38' 25.00' 90'14'48" 35.43' S 46'41'21" E 200_AT MINUTES PAST _,M., AND
RECORDED IN VOLUME_ OF PLATS PAGE AT THE REQUEST MINISTER AND GLAESER
C11 39.16' 25.00' 89'45'12" 35.28' S 43'18'39" W
C13 39.38' 25.00' 90'14'48" 35.43' N 46'41'21" W SURVEYING, INC.
C14 39.16' 25.00' 89'45'12" 35.28' N 43"18'39" E
C15 39.38' 25,00' 90'14'48" 35.43' S 46'41'21" E
C16 39.16' 25.00' 89'45'12" 35.28' S 43'18'39" W
C17 39.38' 25.00' 90"14'48" 35.43' N 46'41'21" w FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR
MINISTER AND GLAESER SURVEYING, INC. MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO MATTERS OF C17 39.3 ' 25.00' 89°45'12" 3 '
' UNWRITTEN TITLE SUCH AS ADVERSE POSSESSION, 5.28 N 43'18'39" E INDEX N0.
ACQUIESCENCE, ESTOPPEL, ETC. C19 39.38' 25.00' 90'14'48" 35.43' S 46'41'21"
'.f ALL CORNERS NOTED AS FOUND WERE VISITED ON 07-17-02 C29 39 16' 25 00' 89.45'12" E
35.28 S 43'18'39" W
�,..'.
DWG FILE: 08090.DWG DRAWN BY: JAG,CTP CALC BY: JJS
FEE NO.
PREPARED BY:
MINISTER AND GLAESER
SURVEYING, INC. THREE RIVERS' CR DSSlNG
SURVEYING,BURDEN BLVD., SUITE E
PASCO, WA 99301
(509) 544-7802
P HA LS)1 Fwj 5
PERIMETER DESCRIPTION A SUBDIVISION IN A PORTION 0
0 F THE
A PARCEL OF LAND IN A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 9 NORTH, W 1 /2 OF THE NW 1 /4
RANGE 29 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
OF SECTION 10
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 10; T. 9 N. R. Z9
E., W M ,
THENCE SOUTH 01'33'57"EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, 1125.29 FEET CITY OF PASCO
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
FRANKLIN COUNTY, WASHINGTON
THENCE LEAVING THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, NORTH 88'26'04" EAST, 170.00 FEET; JOB NUMBER: 08-090 MAY 29, 2008
THENCE SOUTH 01'33'57" EAST, 8.59 FEET; SHEET 1 OF 3
THENCE NORTH 88'26'04" EAST, 260.00 FEET;
°' TREASURER'S CERTIFICATE:
THENCE NORTH 01'33 57 WEST, 1.12 FEET;
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE TAXES ON THE LAND DESCRIBED HEREON HAVE BEEN PAID
THENCE NORTH $8'26 04 EAST, 130.00 FEET; TO AND INCLUDING THE YEAR A.D.
THENCE NORTH 01'33'57" WEST, 11.26 FEET;
FOUND IRON PIPE WITH 2 1/2" BRASS CAP FRANKLIN COUNTY TREASURER DATE
THENCE NORTH 88'26'04" EAST, 130.00 FEET; STAMPED: "USER", DISTURBED, HELD
CALCULATED POSITION AS SHOWN IN "THREE SEARCHED FOR USER MONUMENT NOT
RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" (D-269) ( FRANKLIN COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE
FOUND). HELD CALCULATED POSITION AS
THENCE SOUTH 01'33'57" EAST, 10.56 FEET; 3 SHOWN IN "THREE RIVERS CROSSING
' 4 3 N88'11'14~E 2663.24' PHASE 1" (D-269) APPROVALS:
THENCE NORTH 88'26 04 EAST, 130.00 FEET; 10� THE E ANNEXED PLAT IS HEREBY APPROVED BY AND FOR THE CITY OF PASCO, STATE OF
THENCE SOUTH 01'33'57" EAST, 563.08 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2" 9 10 WASHINGTON.
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 'D"OF PLATS, AT PAGE 290, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY,
WASHINGTON;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY PERIMETER LINE OF SAID "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2"THE FOLLOWING COURSES; CHAIRMAN, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DATE
THENCE SOUTH 88'26'04" WEST, 100.00 FEET; N °o PASCO CITY ENGINEER DATE
THENCE SOUTH 88'49'46" WEST, 60.00 FEET; o N
v
w MAYOR' CITY OF PASCO DATE
THENCE SOUTH 88'26'04" WEST, 100.00 FEET; c
THENCE SOUTH 01'33'58" EAST, 8.58 FEET; ATTEST:
CITY CLERK DATE
THENCE SOUTH 88'26'04" WEST, 160.00 FEET;
THE UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE HEREBY APPROVED.
THENCE SOUTH 01'33 57" EAST, 3.32 FEET;
SITE FRANKLIN COUNTY P.U.D. DATE
THENCE SOUTH 88'26'04" WEST, 100.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 21; DEDICATION
N
THENCE SOUTH 01'33'57" EAST, ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 2"AND THE I, THE UNDERSIGNED, DENNIS MURPHY, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM THE OWNER OF THE
EXTENSION THEREOF, 638.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 55 OF 'THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1" TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED HEREON AND THAT I HAVE CAUSED SAID LAND TO BE
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME "D"OF PLATS, AT PAGE 269, RECORDS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, � `O- SURVEYED AND PLATTED INTO LOTS AS SHOWN HEREON AND THAT ALL STREETS,
WASHINGTON;
ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON ARE HEREBY
DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC AND THAT THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL HEREAFTER BE
THENCE ALONG THE PERIMETER LINE OF SAID "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 1"THE FOLLOWING COURSES; KNOWN AND DESIGNATED BY THE NAME "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 5".
THENCE SOUTH 87'42'03" WEST, 74.69 FEET;
THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF A 25.00 FOOT RADIUS TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS 10 DENNIS MURPHY DATE
f. NORTH 82'36'26" WEST, FOR A CHORD DISTANCE OF 8.42 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19'23'02", FOR AN ARC 9 10 N87'42'04"E 2621.53' HAYDEN HOMES L.L.C.
HELD CALCULATED POSITION OF
DISTANCE OF 8.46 FEET; THE CENTER OF SECTION 10
FOUND AND HELD IRON AS SHOWN IN "THREE RIVERS ACKNOWLEDGMENT
THENCE SOUTH 17'05'56" WEST, 60.00 FEET; PIPE WITH 2 1/2" BRASS CROSSING PHASE 1" (D-269) •
CAP STAMPED: "USER" AS STATE OF WASHINGTON
THENCE SOUTH 24'14'59" WEST, 117.76 FEET; THE WEST 1/4 OF SECTION COUNTY OF FRANKLIN
'S
10. (TIED 7-17-02)
THENCE SOUTH 87'42'04" WEST, 146.53 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID i CERTIFY THAT I KNOW OR HAVE SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE THAT DENNIS MURPHY
SECTION 10, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE MOST WESTERLY NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID 'THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE HAS SIGNED THIS PLAT, ON OATH STATED THAT HE IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE
THIS PLAT AND ACKNOWLEDGED IT AS THE FREE AND VOLUNTARY ACT OF SUCH
1 ' SECTION BREAK PARTY FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES MENTIONED ON THIS PLAT.
THENCE NORTH 01'33'57" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10, 1384.43 FEET
NOT TO SCALE
TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
NOTARY PUBLIC
CONTAINING 15.87 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. DATE
;? TOGETHER WITH AND SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS APPARENT OR OF RECORD.
MY APPOINTMENT EXPIRES
THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS AN ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND ACTUALLY SURVEYED. RESIDING
CITY OF PASCO REQUIRED NOTES AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE:
A) ADDRESSES WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE CITY OF PASCO WHEN BUILDING FILED FOR RECORD THIS DAY OF , 200_AT MINUTES PAST _.M., AND
PERMITS ARE ISSUED. P"' IIEUMINARY RECORDED IN VO
LUME_OF PLATS PAGE AT THE REQUEST MINISTER AND GLAESER
J4 SURVEYING, INC.
B) THE INDIVIDUAL OR COMPANY MAKING IMPROVEMENTS ON A LOT OR LOTS
117. OF THIS PLAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND INSTALLING ALL
TRENCH, CONDUIT, PRIMARY VAULTS, SECONDARY JUNCTION BOXES, AND FRANKLIN COUNTY AUDITOR INDEX N0.
BACKFILL FOR THE PUD'S PRIMARY AND SECONDARY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUD SPECIFICATIONS; SAID INDIVIDUAL OR COMPANY
WILL MAKE FULL ADVANCE PAYMENT OF LINE EXTENSION FEES AND WILL FEE N0.
PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY UTILITY EASEMENTS PRIOR TO PUD CONSTRUCTION
AND\OR CONNECTION OF ANY ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO OR WITHIN THE PLAT. A. G SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE:
'�•' C) LOTS 16, 17, 20, 21, 39, 40, 43, 44, 55, 56, 60 AND 61 PRESENT ��� o� �was'•l
I, CRAIG A. GALVIN, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,
r. � � HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PLAT OF "THREE RIVERS CROSSING PHASE 5", AS SHOWN
DIFFICULTIES FOR THE PLACEMENT OF FENCING OR OTHER SIGHT/ ACCESS F HEREON, IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. SAID PLAT IS BASED
OBSTRUCTIONS. FENCING SHALL NOT ENCROACH OR INHIBIT ACCESS TO ANY x; ON AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY OF THE LAND DESCRIBED, AND THAT SAID PLAT IS STAKED
CITY UTILITIES FOR ANY LOTS WITHIN THIS PLAT. ON THE GROUND AS INDICATED HEREON.
x
D) THE DEVELOPER/BUILDER SHALL PAY THE CITY OF PASCO A "COMMON o = ` j c 43sos��° o
AREA MAINTENANCE FEE OF $375.00 PER LOT UPON ISSUANCE OF 0- � �- � � st0,` STS*
BUILDING PERMITS FOR HOMES. s o z M Z o NAL CRAIG A. GALVIN, PROFESSIONAL LAND DATE
Q o¢ 0 NARRATIVE FOR GEODETIC CONTROL EXPIRES: SURVEYOR, PLS # 43609
E) THE DEVELOPER/BUILDER SHALL PAY THE CITY OF PASCO A TRAFFIC m Q v THE GEODETIC CONTROL STATIONS USED FOR THIS SURVEY ARE THE FOLLOWING MONUMENTS: PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT:
MITIGATION FEE" OF $150.00 PER LOT UPON ISSUANCE OF BUILDING Z ENT:
y.,. " rn w w " OFFICE" AND "MINISTER AND GLAESER SURVEYING TEMPORARY GPS CONTROL STATION "200",
PERMITS FOR HOMES". o < a v "201" & "203". WE FIRST PERFORMED A FAST STATIC CPS SURVEY BY CONSTRAINING THE A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED OVER, UNDER AND UPON THE FRONT
L- Z FOLLOWING GEODETIC CONTROL POINTS: "OFFICE" AND "200" AND UN-CONSTRAINING "201" & 10.00 FEET OF ALL LOTS ADJACENT TO ALL STREETS FOR THE INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION,
F) LOTS ABUTTING CONVENTION DRIVE DO NOT HAVE DIRECT ACCESS TO F-- p � Z RENEWING
CONVENTION DRIVE. ° Q 4 :Do o , OPERATING AND MAINTAINING OF ALL UTILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THIS EASEMENT.
z � L- U w 203 . A CHECK TO 201 WAS 0.04 IN THE NORTHING, 0.05 IN THE FASTING, THIS WAS ALL
z o COO Z AT A 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL. WE THEN USED A "TRIMBLE REAL TIME KINEMATIC CPS SYSTEM"
G) AN EASEMENT IS HEREBY RESERVED OVER, UNDER AND UPON THE FIRST 10 6 o V) Q ° � TO COLLECT DATA FOR THIS SURVEY. WE SET UP A "TRIMBLE 4000SSE" CPS RECEIVER AND A IRRIGATION:
FEET OF ALL LOTS ADJACENT TO ALL STREETS FOR THE INSTALLATION, z o I- V) ---
o "TRIMBLE TRIMMARK III" 25 WATT UHF RADIO AT CONTROL STATION "203". WE THEN USED A
v w w o v "TRIMBLE IRRIGATION SERVICE LINES ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE TO LOTS WITHIN THIS PLAT; HOWEVER,
CONSTRUCTION, RENEWING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING NATURAL GAS, Q w o w TRIMBLE 5800 CPS RECEIVER WITH AN INTERNAL UHF RADIO PLUS A "TRIMBLE ACU" DATA
ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE AND 7V CABLE. M Q w w p t in COLLECTOR FOR OUR ROVER UNIT. WE HAD 5 CHECKS TO STATION "OFFICE" FROM STATION WATER FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT CURRENTLY AVAILABLE. THE CITY OF PASCO IS
`�
w J Z z - � "203" WITH A STANDARD ERROR OF 0.03', A STANDARD DEVIATION OF 0.04' AND A 95% CONSTRUCTING ITS IRRIGATION INFRASTRUCTURE ON AN ONGOING BASIS. THE USE OF THE
H) THE DEVELOPER SHALL INSTALL A WALL/FENCE ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY o CL -j w M o » » » SYSTEM WILL BECOME AVAILABLE AS TIME AND RESOURCES PERMIT THE EXPANSION AND
OF CONVENTION DRIVE. THE CITY MAY MAKE REPAIRS OR REPLACE THE V) w w rn CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF 0.05 . WE HAD 5 CHECKS TO STATION 200 FROM STATION 203
WALL/FENCE AS NEEDED. PROPERTY OWNERS ADJOINING SAID WALL/FENCE in Q z Z z �,rn rn WITH A STANDARD ERROR OF 0.02', A STANDARD DEVIATION OF 0.04' AND A 95% CONNECTION OF NEW SYSTEMS TO THE EXISTING IRRIGATION SUPPLY.
Q t- o w o o °' CONFIDENCE LEVEL OF 0.05'.
ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PAYMENT OF ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH m cn ry v 0 0
MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND UPKEEP OF THE WALL/FENCE. MINISTER AND GLAESER SURVEYING, INC. MAKES NO WARRANTIES AS TO MATTERS OF
UNWRITTEN TITLE SUCH AS ADVERSE POSSESSION, ACQUIESCENCE, ESTOPPEL, ETC.
,. ALL CONTROLLING SECTION CORNERS NOTED AS FOUND WERE VISITED ON 07-17-02
r
DWG FILE: 08090.DWG DRAWN BY: JAG,CTP CALC BY: JJS
AGENDA REPORT NO. 17
FOR: City Council a May 19, 2008
TO: Gary Crutch ty Manager
Robert J. Alb s orks Director
FROM: Michael McS aneA Engineer Regular Mtg.: 06-02-08
SUBJECT: Accept Water Sampling Station Installation Project, #07-2-05
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Resolution
11. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
06102: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.3Q--?3 accepting the work
performed by Sharpe & Preszier Construction Company, Inc., under
contract for the Water Sampling Station Installation Project,
#07-2-05.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Water Fund
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) On February 4, 2008, Council awarded the Water Sampling Station Installation
Project, #07-2-05 to Sharpe & Preszler Construction Company, Inc. for the amount
of$43,505.00, plus applicable sales tax.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The final project cost was $44,709.00, plus applicable sales tax. The overage was
due to the addition of four protective bollards at one of the stations. The work is
now complete and staff recommends acceptance of the work.
3(f)
RESOLUTION NO.s,R
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY SHARPE & PRESZLER
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE WATER SAMPLING
STATION INSTALLATION PROJECT, #07-2-05.
WHEREAS, the work performed by SHARPE & PRESZLER CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INC., under contract for the Water Sampling Station Installation Project, #07-2-05,
has been examined by Engineering and has been found to be in apparent compliance with the
applicable project specifications and drawings, and
WHEREAS, it is Engineering recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the
contractor's work and the project as complete; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, that the
City Council concurs with Engineering recommendation and thereby accepts the work performed
by SHARPE & PRESZLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., under contract for the Water
Sampling Station Installation Project, #07-2-05, as being completed in apparent conformance
with the project specifications and drawings, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to
applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction
of same and verification thereof by the Public Works Director and Finance Manager.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 21 st day of April, 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr
Deputy City Clerk City Attorney
AGENDA REPORT NO. 21
FOR: City Council May 23,2008
TO: Gary Crutchfield-City Mana
Robert J. Albe Work irector
FROM: Michael McShw X, i Engineer Regular Mtg.: 06/02/2008
SUBJECT: Accept Commercial Avenue Reconstruction Project, #05-3-07
1. REFERENCE(S):
1. Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
06/02: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No.3�JO�-� accepting the work
performed by Granite Northwest, Inc. dba Transtate Paving
Company, under contract for the Commercial Avenue
Reconstruction Project, #05-3-07.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Arterial Street Fund
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) On March 17, 2008, Council awarded the Commercial Avenue Reconstruction
Project, #05-3-07 to Granite Northwest, Inc. dba Transtate Paving Company for
$101,112.00, including Alternate B.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The final project cost was $92,299.69. The work is now complete and staff
recommends acceptance of this work.
3(g)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY GRANITE NORTHWEST,
INC. dba TRANSTATE PAVING COMPANY UNDER CONTRACT FOR THE
COMMERCIAL AVENUE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, #05-3-07.
WHEREAS, the work performed by GRANITE NORTHWEST, INC. dba
TRANSTATE PAVING COMPANY, under contract for the Commercial Avenue
Reconstruction Project, #05-3-07, has been examined by Engineering and has been found to be
in apparent compliance with the applicable project specifications and drawings, and
WHEREAS, it is Engineering recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the
contractor's work and the project as complete; NOW,THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, that the
City Council concurs with Engineering recommendation and thereby accepts the work performed
by GRANITE NORTHWEST, INC. dba TRANSTATE PAVING COMPANY, under contract
for the Commercial Avenue Reconstruction Project, #05-3-07, as being completed in apparent
conformance with the project specifications and drawings, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to
applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction
of same and verification thereof by the Public Works Director and Finance Manager.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 2nd day of June, 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr
Deputy City Clerk City Attorney
r
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council May 30, 2008
FROM: Gary Crutchfie t anager Regular Mtg.: June 2, 2008
SUBJECT: Voters' Pamph t Committees
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. RCW 29A.32.280
2. County Auditor Rules for Committee Statements
3. Proposed Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
612: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , appointing ad-hoc
citizen committees for the preparation of voter pamphlet
statements regarding the Pasco Pools Bond issue.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Pasco Ordinance No. 3863, approved by City Council on May 19, placed a $5
million bond issue on the August primary election ballot.
B) The County Auditor has advised the city that RCW 29A.32 requires two actions
by the city, both within the timeframe necessary to have the products included in
the voters' pamphlet to be published by the state in July. First, the city must
submit an "explanatory statement," which uses one-hundred words or less to
explain the ballot proposition; that statement is being prepared by staff and
reviewed by the City Attorney(as required by law) before submittal to the County
Auditor next week. Second, the City Council is required to appoint two
committees, one to write a statement in support of the proposition and the other to
write a statement in opposition, both statements to be included in the voter
pamphlet (see reference#2, County Auditor Rules).
C) The County Auditor has advised that the deadline for submittal of the required
statements (both explanatory and committee) has been fixed as Friday, June 6,
2008.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The public call for volunteers to fill the two citizen committees was announced at
the end of the May 27 City Council meeting and was highlighted on the city's
webpage as of noon, Wednesday, May 28. All requests received by noon
Monday, June 2, will be provided to Council at the meeting for Council selection
to fill the slots in each committee.
B) Staff requests Council confirm the Mayor's appointment of no more than three
applicants to each of the two committees by passage of the proposed resolution.
The resolution will be filed with the County Auditor and the committees will have
the opportunity to fill the mandate of RCW 29A.32.
8(a)
RCW 29A.32.280: Arguments advocating approval or disapproval —Preparation by com... Page 1 of 1
RCW 29A.32.280
Arguments advocating approval or disapproval--Preparation by committees.
For each measure from a unit of local government that is included in a local voters'pamphlet,the legislative authority of
that jurisdiction shall, not later than forty-five days before the publication of the pamphlet, formally appoint a committee to
prepare arguments advocating voters'approval of the measure and shall formally appoint a committee to prepare
arguments advocating voters'rejection of the measure.The authority shall appoint persons known to favor the measure
to serve on the committee advocating approval and shall,whenever possible,appoint persons known to oppose the
measure to serve on the committee advocating rejection. Each committee shall have not more than three members,
however, a committee may seek the advice of any person or persons. If the legislative authority of a unit of local
government fails to make such appointments by the prescribed deadline,the county auditor shall whenever possible
make the appointments.
[2003 c 111 §820.Prior: 1994 c 191 §2;1984 c 106§10.Formerly RCW 29.81A.080.]
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=29A.32.280 5/30/2008
III. SPECIFICATIONS FOR BALLOT MEASURE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
A. Requirements of Law. A ballot measure submitted for inclusion in a local voters'
pamphlet must be accompanied by an explanatory statement about the measure. (RCW
29A.32.240)
B. Preparation of Explanatory Statements. Explanatory statements should be prepared
or reviewed by the attorney for the district submitting the ballot measure. All explanatory
statements not written or reviewed by an attorney for a city, town or district will be
submitted to the County Prosecuting Attorney for review and approval. All explanatory
statements are subject to being reviewed by the County Prosecuting Attorney's Office.
All explanatory statements will also be placed on the Franklin County Auditor's Office,
Election Division Internet Page prior to the Election.
C. Purpose of Explanatory Statements. The explanatory statement shall tell what the
current law is and what the results of passage of the ballot measure would be.
D. Restrictions on Explanatory Statements
CONTENT: Statements which are found to be libelous, biased in content, obscene,
profane or defamatory will be rejected. Rejected statements may be resubmitted or
appealed within three (3) days.
We suggest short, concise sentences arranged in three or four short paragraphs.
Statements should be typed or printed neatly when submitted.
LENGTH: Explanatory statements shall not exceed 100 words.
DEADLINE: All explanatory statements must be submitted along with their election
request not later than the resolution cutoff date. Voter Pamphlet materials are accepted
in person, by mail and electronically. Once submitted, they may not be withdrawn or
changed.
E. Typography. To promote consistency, all explanatory statements shall be typewritten on
plain sheets of white paper measuring eight and on-half inches by eleven inches (8 W, x
1'1") and contain the name, address and telephone number of the person submitting such
statement. All statements shall be typeset in block paragraph style without tables, lists, or
other material requiring multiple indentations. Words, phrases and sentences which are
in italics, underlined, in bold print, printed in a larger font size or emphasized in some
other manner will be typeset in italics in a font size matching the rest of the statement.
Statements which are all in upper case letters will be set in normal lower case except for
the first letter of proper nouns and the first letter of the first word in a sentence. Headings
will be set in bold caps and centered.
F. Editing of Statements for the Local Voters' Pamphlet. The County Auditor finds that it
is in the public interest that all statements published in the Local Voters' Pamphlet be
accurate as to form and syntax. To promote such accuracy, the County Auditor may
correct any incidental errors of spelling, grammar and punctuation which he/she feels
4
would unfairly prejudice the statement or confuse the voters so long as such corrections
do not alter the meaning or substance of statement. This office is not obligated, however,
to make such corrections and we assume no responsibility for errors whish result from
inaccuracies in the original statement submitted by the candidate.
G. Deadline Extension. The Franklin County Auditor shall have the authority to grant any
deadline extensions which he/she feels are in the best public interest. All extensions will
be equally granted to opposing candidates or committees. Extensions will not be granted
for failure to submit materials by the times and dates established in these specifications.
5
IV. SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMMITTEE STATEMENTS
A. Committees to Write Statements "For" And "Against" Ballot Measures
'1. Requirements of Law. Any city, town or district placing a ballot measure on the
General Election ballot shall have a statement supporting and a statement opposing
the ballot measure included in the voters' pamphlet. (RCW 29A.32.280)
2. Preparation of Statements "For" and "Against" a Ballot Measure. For each
measure from a unit of local government that is included in the local voters' pamphlet,
the legislative authority of that jurisdiction shall, not later than 45 days before the
publication of the pamphlet:
a. Formally appoint a committee to prepare arguments advocating voters'
approval of the measure; and
b. Formally appoint a committee to prepare arguments advocating voters'
rejection of the measure.
c. The legislative authority shall appoint persons known to favor the measure to
serve on the committee advocating approval and shall, whenever possible,
appoint persons known to oppose the measure to serve on the committee
advocating rejection.
3. Each committee shall not have more than three members; however, a committee may
seek the advice of any person or persons. The committee shall submit one
statement, jointly authored.
4. The committee shall elect from their members, a chair person and shall notify the
County Auditor of the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the committee
members. (A form is attached to be filled out and filed by each committee submitting
a supporting or opposing statement.)
5. If the legislative authority of a unit of local government fails to make such
appointments by the prescribed deadline the county auditor shall whenever possible
make the appointments.
B. Restrictions on Ballot Measure Statements:
1. Content: Statements which are found to be libelous, obscene, profane or defamatory
will be rejected by the County Auditor. Rejected statements may be re-submitted or
appealed within three days of rejection.
2. Length: An official statement, either for or against any local measure, shall not
exceed 250 words. The committee may use up to four headings to summarize and
identify major points or portions of the statement for the convenience of the reader.
Such headings shall be included in the computations of the number of words in the
statement. Each of the three committee members may submit contact information for
inclusion in the voters' pamphlet consisting of: A telephone number, an email, and an
Internet address which will not count toward the maximum word allowance. All of the
material in excess of the word limit, counting from the beginning of the statement, will
6
be omitted. If such a deletion creates an incomplete portion of a sentence at the end
of the statement, that incomplete sentence will be omitted. There will be no exception
to these limitations.
3. Format: All statements should be typewritten on plain sheets of white paper
measuring eight and one-half inches by eleven inches (8 '/2" x 11") and containing the
name, address and telephone number of the chairperson of the committee and the
names of the other two committee members submitting such statement. All
statements shall be typeset in block paragraph style, without tables, lists or other
material requiring multiple indentions. Headings will be set in bold caps and centered;
the statement will be set in upper/lower case. Words, phrases, or whole sentences
which are underlined, in bold print, printed in a larger font size, in upper case letters, or
in italics will be typeset in italics in a font size matching the rest of the statement.
Statements which are all in upper case letters will be set in normal lower case except
for the first letter of proper nouns and the first letter of the first word in a sentence.
D. Editing of Statements for the Local Voters' Pamphlet. The County Auditor (or staff)
may correct any incidental errors of spelling, grammar and punctuation which he or she
feels would unfairly prejudice the committee's statement or confuse the voter so long as
'such corrections do not alter the meaning or substance of the statement. This office is
not obligated, however, to make such corrections and we assume no responsibility for
errors which result from inaccuracies in the original statement submitted by the
committee.
E. Deadline for Submission of Statements. All official statements must be submitted
by no later than the resolution cutoff date. This will allow time for statement review and
preparation for printing.
F. Rebuttal Statements. Upon receipt of "For" and "Against" statements, the County
Auditor will exchange copies with the opposing committees so that each can write a
rebuttal, not to exceed 75 words. Such rebuttal statements must be addressed to the
opposition argument and must not inject any new issue. There is no space to use
headings or subheadings in the rebuttal statement. Rebuttal statements must be
submitted within 5 days of Auditor's mail or email date. Hearings are not permitted in
connection with rebuttal statements.
G. Committees. The names of the three members of the committee to compose the
statement for the local voters' pamphlet will be listed as they appear on the committee
assignment form. The appointments must be made 45 days prior to publication of the
pamphlet.
H. Appeal of Rejected Statements. Committees will be notified if their statement has been
rejected for any reason. They will have three days after the rejection notice to appeal it or
submit a re-written statement.
The Auditor may submit any rejected statement to the Prosecuting Attorney's office for
review. The Auditor will render a decision on the appeal within 2 business days following
receipt of the appeal. The decision will be final.
7
I. Deadline Extension. The Franklin County Auditor shall have the authority to grant any
deadline extension which he feels is in the best public interest. All extensions will be
equally granted to opposing candidates or committees.
J. Fees. No fees will be charged to committees submitting materials to be included in the
local voters' pamphlet.
The cost of the local voters' pamphlet shall be considered an election cost to those
jurisdictions included in the pamphlet and shall be prorated in the manner provided in
RCW 29A.04.410.
K. Failure to Submit Committee Statement. If a committee does not submit a printable
statement for inclusion, the following language will appear in the Voters' Pamphlet: "No
Committee Statement was Submitted".
L. Viewing of Statements. Viewing of statements shall be allowed after the official
deadline for submission of statements has passed and the statements have been
delivered to opposing committees for rebuttal.
M. Online Voter's Guide. The statements "For' and "Against" a ballot measure and the
rebuttal statements will also be placed on the Franklin County Auditor's Office, Election
Division Internet Page prior to the Election.
8
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
FOR AND AGAINST BALLOT MEASURE STATEMENTS
FRANKLIN COUNTY LOCAL VOTERS' PAMPHLET
JURISDICTION:
PROPOSITION:
The following is a list of persons whose names will appear in conjunction with a "FOR"
Statement, supporting a ballot measure submitted for the Franklin County Local Voters'
Pamphlet.
Three member committee to draft argument SUPPORTING a ballot measure:
Chairperson's Name Title or Organization Phone No.
Committee Member Name Title or Organization Phone No.
Committee Member Name Title or Organization Phone No.
The following is a list of persons whose names will appear in conjunction with an "AGAINST"
Statement, supporting a ballot measure submitted for the Franklin County Local Voters'
Pamphlet.
Three member committee to draft argument OPPOSING a ballot measure:
Chairperson's Name Title or Organization Phone No.
Committee Member Name Title or Organization Phone No.
Committee Member Name Title or Organization Phone No.
**wwwwwwwww*wwwwwww**www*,t*,rw**w*ww**www**war*w*****wt*****w**w,rwxww,r*w***w***k*w**w�r**w*ww,tww****w*ww*
I hereby certify that the above named individuals have been appointed and have consented to
serve as indicated and the name, titles, and/or organizations should be listed in the official local
voters' pamphlet in the manner set forth above.
DATE CHAIR,
Jurisdiction's Legislative Authority
9
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLU'T'ION establishing committees for voter pamphlet statements.
WHEREAS, the City Council, by its adoption of Ordinance No. 3863, placed a property tax bond
issue on the August primary election ballot seeking voter approval to finance part of the cost of
renovating Memorial Pool and constructing a new outdoor water park; and
WHEREAS, RCW 29A.32 requires certain information to be included in a voter's pamphlet and
that, to the extent possible, the City Council shall appoint two committees of not more than three
members each, one to draft a statement supporting and the other opposing the ballot proposition; and
WHEREAS, the Franklin County Auditor has extended the deadline for submission of the required
statements to Friday, June 6, 2008; and
WHEREAS, the City, at its public meeting conducted on May 27, 2008 and subsequently via its
website, called for volunteers to serve on such citizen committees, for appointment at the Council's
June 2 meeting; NOW,THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO:
Section 1: That an ad-hoc citizen committee, to be known as the "Swimming Pools Bond Approval
Committee" is hereby created and shall consist of the following Pasco residents:
1.
2.
3.
Section 2: That an ad-hoc citizen committee, to be known as the "Swimming Pools Bond Rejection
Committee" is hereby created and shall consist of the following Pasco residents:
1.
2.
3.
Section 3: Both committees are hereby directed to prepare statements for the voters' pamphlet in
accordance with the requirements of RCW 29A.32.280 and the rules promulgated by the Franklin
County Auditor. Said statements shall be filed by the respective committee with the Franklin County
Auditor before close of business June 6, 2008. Rebuttal statements, if any, shall be filed by the
respective committee with the Franklin County Auditor before close of business June 9, 2008.
Section 4: The ad-hoc committees created herein shall cease to exist as of June 10, 2008.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this 2nd day of June, 2008.
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debra L. Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
AGENDA REPORT NO. 13
FOR: City Council May 28, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfi trtsb- Manager
FROM: Robert J. Alb c W orks Director Regular Mtg.: 06/02/08
SUBJECT: Columbia River Crossing Study
I. REFERENCE(S):
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
06/02: MOTION: 1 move to approve the authorization for a bridge study between
Road 68 and the SR395 Blue Bridge by the Benton Franklin
Council of Governments (BFCG) and authorize $ for
the study.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
$25,000 to $60,000
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) On October 9, 2006 Mr. Mark Kushner, Transportation Director for the Benton
Franklin Council of Governments (BFCG) discussed with Council the finding that
came out of the preliminary study for a new bridge across the Columbia River.
The initial finding indicated a new Columbia River Bridge between Road 100 and
the SR395 Blue Bridge or adding onto the SR395 Blue Bridge would be beneficial
in the future. A more detailed review would be needed.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Since the October 9, 2006 meeting, the BFCG has been in discussion with all the
local agencies including WSDOT on how to proceed forward on the next review.
The next step is to identify the project and retain a consultant to perform a review
with the aid of a traffic computer model. The project would be to review the need
for a bridge between Road 100 and the SR395 Blue Bridge or a bridge between
Road 68 and the SR395 Blue Bridge. Since the project has regional significance,
the BFCG has received the following fund commitments.
BFCG $25,000
WSDOT $10,000
BF Transit $10,000
Franklin Co. $10,000
Kennewick $10,000
Pasco (budgeted) $25,000
The City's portion is budgeted only and has not been approved for expenditures
by Council. Mr. Kushner will discuss with Council the status of the project, the
bridge options and funding.
10(a)
AGENDA REPORT NO. 08
FOR: City Council May 20, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfi anager
FROM: Robert J. Albe O4c orks Director Workshop Mtg.: 05/27/08
VV Regular Mtg.: 06/02/08
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with The Transpo Group
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Amendment No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement
Figures 1 & 2
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
05/27: Discussion
06/02: MOTION: I move to approve Amendment No. 2 to the August 16, 2004
Professional Services Agreement with The Transpo Group
authorizing additional transportation and traffic management
services not to exceed $39,500 and further, authorize the
Mayor to sign the agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The existing I-182 access points at Road 100 and Road 68 create constraints on
how to manage the increasing volume of traffic. In 2007, staff had The Transpo
Group identify several options that may help alleviate current and future traffic
impacts. Three potential projects were identified that would need further review
and discussions with Washington State Department of Transportation and the
Federal Highway Administration (Figure 1).
V. DISCUSSION:
A) This amendment is to determine the feasibility of these options and to show the
benefits that would be gained if any or all of the options would be implemented.
This review would be consistent with Councils' Road 68 Congestion Goal. The
amendment would also review if there are any viable options for the
under/overpasses of I-182 connecting Burden Boulevard and Argent Road or
Chapel Hill Boulevard south (Figure 2). Jon Pascal of The Transpo Group will
make a short presentation and address any questions.
This project is not in the 2008 budget and the costs would need to be reflected in
the year end supplemental budget. Staff recommends approval of Amendment
No. 2 to The Transpo Group Professional Services Agreement.
10(b)
AMENDMENT NUMBER 2 to
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City and The Transpo Group entered into a Professional Services
Agreement on August 16, 2004, with respect to on-going transportation and traffic management
services.
NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is amended to allow The Transpo Group to
provide additional transportation consulting and traffic design and engineering services.
1. Scope of Work.
Scope of service includes the evaluation of transportation options outlined in Exhibit A
(Figure 1 and Figure 2).
2. Fee.
The compensation for the work shown in Exhibit A is based on a time and material
basis not to exceed $39,000.
3. Time of performance.
The services shall be completed for the project within 180 days.
DATED THIS DAY OF , 2008.
CITY OF PASCO: CONSULTANT—The Transpo Group:
Joyce Olson, Mayor Signature Title
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debbie Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
The Transpo Group 1
Amendment No.2
Professional Services Agreement—On-going Services
Exhibit A The
TMWO
Grasp
Client Name: City of Pasco
Project Name: I-182 / Road 68 Options
Exhibit Dated: April 18, 2008 TG: 08161.PR
The City Public Works Department recently conducted a preliminary assessment of various potential
new roadway connections in the 1-182 corridor / West Pasco area. A series of alternative options
were identified with the objective of reducing traffic congestion along Road 68 near the I-182
interchange and the Burden Blvd intersection.
The preliminary assessment resulted in the identification of a limited number of alternatives that were
judged to merit further review and analysis. The selected alternatives are shown on the attached
figures, and include new surface street connections across 1-182, or new freeway connections with I-
182.
Based on this initial work, the City Public Works Department recommends developing a more
detailed analysis of engineering feasibility and traffic evaluation of potential benefits shown in Figure 1
and Figure 2. Table 1 documents the estimated cost for this work by major task.
Table 1. Fee Projection by Task
Task Description Fee Projection
01 Engineering Feasibility S115,000
02 Traffic Operations/Safety Analyses $13,000
03 Meetings/Coordination $11,500
04 Follow-On Services T&M'
1. T&M-Time-and-materials.
This work will include the following subtasks:
• Refinement of alternative elements based on further engineering review
• Develop conceptual drawings
• Develop planning level cost estimates
• Refine traffic model to better account for congestion effects
• Assess traffic safety impact of proposed alternatives.
• Meetings with WSDOT and FHWA to review proposed interchanges and issues regarding
design standards
• Explore the need and process for developing an Interchange Justification Report.
The analysis will result in a feasibility study of the proposed alternative and more refined elements to
evaluate the costs and potential traffic benefits. This analysis and meetings are expected to be
conducted over the course of the next several months with direction as to the next steps completed
by the end of July 2008. The consultant will conduct the work on a time and materials basis with a fee
not to exceed$39,500.
Page 1
NA,
N -
° Mil I t..
20th Ave _
a�
d Q z = a
j ..
Road 36
4. Road 4:4
,
d :I
r
Road 60 cO -
Row 68 PI -
,
cn o
cu
v
111 ...
C]
\ _ 2
L
/ v
PAIS loowpeaJH_i
0 ca
co
a
gods O
3 o N
c
I ,
FBI LL ~ .�
<D
Q Q Q m fn cu
/
c�
O tU � r
c c c 3 20th Ave
a, � , .
Q a Q z S d -
r .
o�
6 � 1
Ez
Road 36
T.
TT
r!
-�
- _
JT. .. ... .. .. .
Road
44AW
„
i
C T
d
9
Road 60 m ..
Roa 68 PI Roa i
of
Ll
cn
i
:
4
�, ..
,
U) '
CZ
cc
O
— O 4
ctl
N
2 C,
ep C
wU) � �
AGENDA REPORT NO. 10
FOR: City Council May 20, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfi 1 Manager
FROM: Robert J. Albert49-Works Director Workshop Mtg.: 05/27/08
Regular Mtg.: 06/02/08
SUBJECT: Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement with The Transpo Group
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Amendment No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement for Mobility Strategy
2. Study Boundary Map
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
05/27: Discussion
06/02: MOTION: I move to approve Amendment No. 3 to the August 16, 2004
Professional Services Agreement with The Transpo Group
authorizing additional transportation and traffic management
services not to exceed $53,000 and further, authorize the
Mayor to sign the agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The transportation network which accommodates both traffic and pedestrian
needs in and around the downtown area were established years ago when the
downtown was the focal attraction. Lewis Street was the main entrance and a
state highway. The main arterial road from Lewis Street into the county was 4d'
Avenue. Over time the Blue Bridge, Cable Bridge and I-182 were constructed,
which all altered to some degree, the traffic patterns.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The proposed study is to review the area between Clark Street and Court Street
between 3rd Avenue and 5h Avenue. The study would review the existing and
future land uses. The study would evaluate the transportation network as to the
relativity to today's usage and the projected needs. The emphasis would be on the
actual needs for vehicles (such as the number of lanes), parking and pedestrian
patterns. Staff believes with the land use changes occurring in the study area a
review is needed.
B) Amendment No. 3 from The Transpo Group outlines the proposed study. Jon
Pascal of The Transpo Group will make a short presentation and address any
questions. The fee would be on a time and material basis not to exceed $53,000.
The project is not in the 2008 budget and the expenditures would need to be
reflected in the year end supplemental budget. Staff would also engage in
discussions with both Lourdes Medical Center and Franklin County for potential
cost sharing.
Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 3 to The Transpo Group
Professional Services Agreement.
io(c)
AMENDMENT NUMBER 3 to
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City and The Transpo Group entered into a Professional Services
Agreement on August 16, 2004, with respect to on-going transportation and traffic management
services.
NOW, THEREFORE, this agreement is amended to allow The Transpo Group to
provide additional transportation consulting and traffic design and engineering services.
1. Scope of Work.
Scope of service includes the evaluation of transportation options outlined in Exhibit A.
2. Fee.
The compensation for the work shown in Exhibit A is based on a time and material
basis not to exceed $53,000.
3. Time of performance.
The services shall be completed for the project within 270 days.
DATED THIS DAY OF , 2008.
CITY OF PASCO: CONSULTANT—The Transpo Group:
Joyce Olson, Mayor Signature Title
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debbie Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
The Transpo Group
Amendment No. 3
Professional Services Agreement—On-going Services
The
Exhibit A I`a1S 0
Group
Client Name: City of Pasco
Project Name: Mobility Strategy - -_----_-....... _._.._...._..__..
Exhibit Dated: April 18,2008 TG: 0812S.PR
introduction
Based on discussions with the City of Pasco,we have prepared a scope of work to assist in developing
a mobility strategy for the downtown area north of Clark Street. The study area is bounded to the
south by W Clark Street, to the north by W. Court Street, to the east by N. Second Avenue and to the
west by N. Fifth Avenue.
The purpose of the study is to review the transportation system in the study area. The transportation
system consists of all facilities for traffic,bicyclists and pedestrians. Current and future transportation
needs will be part of the strategy. The proposed approach includes future transportation needs,
defusing goals and objectives, a review of existing conditions, and the identification of potential
programs and projects to meet the objectives.
Scope of Services
The proposed work program is organized into seven tasks, as follows:
• Task 1: Transportation system inventory and data collection
• Task 2: Existing transportation conditions analysis
• Task 3: Existing and future land use analysis
• Task 4: Future transportation conditions analysis
• Task 5: Identification of potential transportation improvements
• Task G: Goals and Priorities (draft and final report)
Task 1- Transportation System Inventory and Data Collection
This task covers an inventory of existing transportation facilities and an analysis of the current use of
the system. The consultant team will identify and gather existing data and information relevant to
transportation conditions. Relevant information include roadway geometry (number of lanes, lane
widths), intersection control (channelization, signal timings), transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities,
traffic volumes (for all modes), accident data, parking supply and demand data.
Missing information will be identified and additional information will be collected to fill the gaps.
Additional data collection will include:
• Turning movement counts at key intersections
• Tube counts with vehicle classification on key routes
• Pedestrian crossing volumes
• On-street parking utilization survey
Page 1
The
Exhibit ranspo
Deliverables
• Inventory of existing transportation facilities(maps and narrative)
• Gathering of existing data and information
• Additional data collection
• Identij existing data sources
• Assemble existing information
Task 2 - Existing Transportation Conditions
As part of this task, the consultant will document existing transportation conditions within the study
area, and identify existing issues and deficiencies. The review of existing conditions will include:
• Traffic Operations - Review and evaluate intersection level of service at major intersections.
Identify the existing levels of congestion and any operational deficiencies at intersections and
along major arterials.
• Traffic Safety— Review and document recent accident data. Highlight high accident locations.
• Transit Operations — Identify transit routes, frequency of service and bus stops. Present
transit ridership information. Describe operational deficiencies affecting transit circulation
• Parking Management — Identify on-street and off-street parking supply. Describe current
parking management strategy. Document existing parking utilization ratios. Evaluate if
current parking supply and pricing structure are adequate.
• Bicycles and Pedestrians — Identify existing facilities (sidewalks, crossings, paths, trails,
lighting) and level of use. Describe main generators of bicycle and pedestrian travel within
and near the study area: retail/commercial districts, residential areas, community centers,
parks.... Identify locations needing safety improvements.
• Truck Delivery Routes—Identify truck routes and document existing level of truck traffic.
Deliverables
• Summary of existing transportation conditions
• Identification of existing issues and deficiencies
City_Support
• Provide available information
• Facilitate contacts with other agencies as needed(Ben Franklin Transit, WSDOT...)
TASK 3 — Existing and Future Land Use Analysis
This task will review and describe existing land uses and land use designations within the study area. It
is important to review what types of residential or commercial developments are present and planned
in the study area to understand the access needs for businesses and residences. The municipal zoning
Page 2
The
Exhibit A Tir, nspd
Group
code will be reviewed to provide more detailed information on the specific zoning districts that
implement the land use designations.
The land use information provides the foundation of travel demand forecasting to analyze future
transportation conditions. The study area is divided into Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) for
transportation planning purposes. The TAZs are the "building blocks" of the travel demand model.
Land use data represents the number and type of residential and employment uses. Land use for
residential is divided into single-family and multi-family households. Land use for commercial is
divided into retail, industrial/manufacturing, FIRESG (financial, insurance, real estate, service,
government), regional mall, airport, schools, offices, hotel/motel, and assisted living/nursing facilities.
Land use data (existing and future) coded in the travel demand model will be reviewed in detail for the
study area, and refined if necessary based on the latest information available.
Deliverables
• Review existing land uses within the study area
• Summary of przdicted gmwth of households and employment
• Update future land use data in travel demand model
City St�port:
• Pmvide all existing City GIS basemap information, including assessor and relevant
transportation data.
• Provide summaries of recent building permits, development pmposals, and future land use
forecasts
TASK 4 — Future Traffic Conditions Analysis
This task will provide an evaluation of 2025 transportation system operations based on expected
growth land use changes and currently planned transportation improvements. The process will
involve the following steps:
• Evaluate future year 2025 land use and transportation conditions. This will include an
evaluation the needs for all modes of travel.
• Evaluate traffic circulation patterns, parking demands, and pedestrian activity centers and
assess potential conflicts and issues between modes.
Deliverables
• 2025 transportation system conditions
Ci[y_Supporr:
Page 3
The
Exhibit A Twfitp-
0
Group
• Review future transportation land use and network assumptions
• Review future trafc control assumptions
TASK S - Identification of Potential Transportation Improvements
Based on the evaluation of existing and forecasts transportation conditions, a list of transportation
improvement strategies and projects will be identified. The strategies and projects will be organized
into the following categories:
• Street Typology - Review existing and future roadway functional classification. Designate
primary purpose of each street within the study area: primary auto circulation; primary
pedestrians and bicycles; primary transit circulation. Plan for and design transportation
improvements that are adequate for the intended primary users. Identify strategies to
maximize efficiency of operations for each mode.
• Street Design -. Make sure the street is designed to encourage safe and appropriate driving
speeds. Explore design elements corresponding to transitional areas to alert drivers to changes
in settings and speeds. Design elements might include: reduced lane widths, medians, curb
extensions, landscaping, lighting fixtures, and street furnishings. Identify what level of
congestion might be acceptable at intersections. When needed, consider intersection
improvements such as added turn lanes that can increase the mobility, capacity and safety of
motorists at intersections.
• Traffic Calming - Consider ways to reduce motor vehicle speeds in areas of high pedestrian
use to improve safety. Ways of managing speeds include: enforcement, street closures, speed
humps, chicanes, traffic curbs, and diverters.
• Transit Improvements - Select the right locations for bus routes and bus stops based on
supporting elements (sidewalks, crossings, parking, pathways). Ensure that sidewalks, cleat
crossing locations, good signage, lighting and other features are in place near transit stops to
improve the safety and comfort of transit users. Assess opportunities for bus lanes to increase
the speed and reliability of transit service. Identify needs and opportunities for bus pullouts
and on-street transit stops. Promote easy transitions between bike riding and transit.
• Pedestrian Circulation and Safety - Focus on crossings and intersections in areas of high
pedestrian activity. To increase se pedestrian safety, consider: advance stop lines, pedestrian
warning signs, reduced design speeds and posted speed limits, increased crosswalk visibility,
improved lighting, raised medians, pedestrian phases at signalized intersections. Explore ways
of separating pedestrians from the roadway through additional sidewalks, new walkways, trails
or grade-separated pedestrian facilities. Consider the needs of persons with disabilities and
ensure that ADA requirements are addressed.
• Bic cle Circulation and Safe - Implement the City's Bikeway Plan adopted by Resolution
3021, which includes a bike route along 1" Avenue and a proposed pathway (along Lewis St,
3`d Avenue, around Volunteer Park to Henry St.). Explore other opportunities for bicycle
Page 4
The
Exhibit A Iranspo
Group
facilities, both on-road and separated. Ensure that there is continuity in the bicycle network
facilities, as well as adequate ties with the transit service. Ensure that pathways are wide
enough to accommodate a mix of users (pedestrians, skaters, cyclists with various skill levels).
Identify and avoid potential conflicts between on-street parking and bicycles. Improve safety
of bicycles at intersections through signs, stripes, and signal timings.
• Parking_Management - Develop a parking management strategy that addresses current needs
and adjusts for future needs. The strategy might involve some of the following elements:
identify clear goals based on the City's vision for downtown's future; focus on maintaining
parking availability rather than simply increasing demand; implement a pricing structure that
meets different types of needs and promote adopted parking goals; ensure that growing
parking needs in downtown area do not impact residential neighborhoods; improved
signage/information to find available parking; generate revenues to fund some of the
downtown area improvements.
• Truck Delivery Routes
Deliverables
• List of potential improvements and recommendations on:
- street typology
- street design
- traffic calming
transit improvements
- pedestrian circulations and safety
- bicycle circulation and safety
- parking management.
City Support:
• Feedback on feasibility and expected level of support for proposed improvements
• Guidance on recommendations for implementation
TASK 6 - Goals and Priorities (Draft and Final Report)
This task will focus on identifying the specific goals and priorities for the transportation system within
the study area. A clear set of goals will guide the development of specific improvements on the
transportation system. The goals and policies must be consistent with those adopted in the
Comprehensive Plan Study and reflect the City's vision for the future. Working primarily with City
staff, the consultant team will develop a set of goals and priorities to guide the development of the
downtown mobility strategy. All work will be incorporated into a final report.
Deliverables
• Identification of specificgoals and policies
City.S_Ypport:
Page 5
The
Exhibit A nspo
Group
• Provide City's vision ofgoals and policies(Lourdes Hospital and Franklin County)
• Facilitate contacts with other stakeholders
Estimated Budget
Transpo will provide the services described in this exhibit on a time-and-materials basis. A breakdown
of the budget for each identified task is outlined in Table 1.
Table 1. Fee Projection by Task
Task Description Fee Projection
01 Transportation Inventory/Data Collection $5,000
02 Existing Transportation Conditions $5,500
03 Land Use Analysis 34,000
04 Future Transportation Conditions 39,000
05 Potential Transportation Improvements $14,500
06 Goals and Priorities/Documentation $8,000
07 Meetings and Presentations $7,000
A total fee of$53,000 is projected to complete the primary tasks as identified in this scope of work.
Transpo will work closely with the project team to assure that all efforts are directed in a manner
consistent with overall project objections. In the event the proposed scope of services will not
successfully meet project objectives,Transpo will coordinate with the City to determine the best
strategy for adjusting the scope. Changes in project deliverables may result in additional work not
reflected in the scope of services. Should changes occur,Transpo will notify the project team if these
changes will require amendments to the scope of services and/or budget.
Schedule
This work program will be completed over the next six months following the project kick-off.
Page 6
STUDY BOUNDARY MAP
COURT ST
Lli
ww w w� w w
1
w 1 Q
jQ I = r
Ln
MARIE S r
1 w
� r a
1 G
M RGFIRET ST
1 ♦ �
PARK CT N S ♦ P S� -A
1X0 ♦ �P� v
NIX(N T ♦ y
oN r
♦ Z �" N SN � ' Z Z
S
�s ♦, � �� � �� 15 S�
cno ow&
OA/L. 521.08
0PAW10 RY'RS PAI
SGILE AS4
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 22, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchf. anager
FROM: Stan Strebel, dmi ' ive and Community Workshop Mtg.: 5/27/08
Services Directo Regular Mtg.: 6/2/08
SUBJECT: Baseball Stadium Lease Amendment
L REFERENCE(S):
I. Proposed Lease Amendment
2. Letter of Understanding
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5/27: Discussion
6/2: Motion: I move to approve the First Amendment to the Baseball Stadium
Lease and further, authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
N/A
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) At the meeting of May 19, Council considered the issues surrounding the Dust
Devil's request for a free standing sign promoting the stadium and the title
sponsor, GESA.
B) Council instructed staff to work out the details of a lease amendment, to
accommodate the sign, consistent with the letter of understanding reviewed at the
meeting of the 19"' and addressing Council's concerns.
C) The attached Amendment to the Lease has been prepared to address each of the
concerns discussed by Council:
1) The sign area is included in the leased premises so that the sign does not
become "off premises" (the final lease area dimensions for the entry road and sign
area have yet to be determined);
2) The sign must meet all codes; and
3) The sign must be moved to another location on Burden Blvd. in the event the
City cannot market the commercial property with the sign in its initial location.
D) Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the lease.
10(d)
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
BASEBALL STADIUM LEASE
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO BASEBALL STADIUM LEASE (this "First
Amendment") is made and entered into this day of May, 2008, by and between the CITY
OF PASCO, a Washington municipal corporation ("City"), and NORTHWEST BASEBALL
VENTURES I LLC, a Washington limited liability company(the "Tenant").
RECITALS:
A. City and Tenant executed that certain Baseball Stadium Lease Agreement dated
January , 2008 (the "Lease")with respect to certain Premises consisting of the Property and
Baseball Stadium located in Franklin County, City of Pasco, Washington, all as more particularly
described in the Lease; and
B. City and Tenant desire to modify certain terms of the Lease, as provided below.
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Tenant hereby agree:
1. Recitals. The following sentence shall be added after the second sentence of the
Recitals:
"The Premises shall also include the entry way and the sign area, subject
to the reservations contained in Section 2.2(i) below, as depicted on Exhibit A
incorporated herein (the "Entry Road Area")."
2. New Section 2.26). The following language shall be incorporated into the Lease as a
new Section 2.2(i):
"(i) To use the Entry Road Area, as depicted on Exhibit A, subject to
(i) the authorized use by users of the playing fields adjacent to the Baseball
Stadium; (ii) City's use for any purpose not inconsistent with Tenant's and
Tenant's agents and guests' ingress and egress to the Baseball Stadium and for
signage; and (iii) the requirements to maintain and insure the Premises
contained in this Lease."
3. New Section 14.2. The following language shall be incorporated into the Lease as a
new Section 14.2:
"Section 14.2. In the event that Tenant sells the right to name the Baseball Stadium to a
third party ("Sponsor") in accordance with Section XIV above, then Sponsor and Tenant
shall be allowed to construct and maintain a sign on the Premises at Sponsor's and
Tenant's sole cost and expense. Such sign shall (i)prominently display the name of the
Baseball Stadium; (ii) comply with all governmental rules and regulations; and (iii)
Sponsor must receive prior written approval of such sign from the City prior to
construction. The location of the sign shall be subject to the approval of the City.
Sponsor and/or Tenant understand that City is attempting to market the commercial land
parcels north of the stadium parking lot and adjacent to Burden Blvd. In the event that
removal of the sign to another location is required, in the sole opinion of the City, for the
City to market either of the parcels, Sponsor and/or Tenant agrees to relocate the sign, at
its sole cost,to a mutually agreeable location along Burden Blvd. City agrees to use its
best efforts to market the property under terms that do not require sign relocation."
4. Exhibit A. Exhibit A attached to this First Amendment shall replace the existing
Exhibit A to the Lease in its entirety.
5. Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument. This Lease or any counterpart may be executed and delivered by facsimile
transmission with an executed hard copy to follow.
6. Continued Effect. Except as hereby amended, the Lease shall remain unchanged in
full force and effect. If there is any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease and
the terms and provisions of this First Amendment, this First Amendment shall control.
7. Definitions. All terms and definitions used in this First Amendment not herein
defined are to be given the definition of the term as provided in the Lease, unless specifically
stated otherwise.
8. Authorization. Each party represents and warrants to the other that it is fully
empowered and authorized to execute and deliver this First Amendment, and the individual
signing this First Amendment on behalf of such parry represents and warrants to the other party
that he or she is fully empowered and authorized to do so.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Tenant have executed this First Amendment the day
and year first above written.
CITY:
CITY OF PASCO, a Washington municipal
corporation
By:
Its:
TENANT:
NORTHWEST BASEBALL VENTURES I LLC, a
Washington limited liability company
By:
Its:
Exhibit A
Pasco Baseball Stadium
Leased Premises
The South 700 feet of the North 1850 feet of the West 550 feet of the East 1043± feet of
the northwest corner of Section 15, Township 9 North, Range 29 East W.M. Franklin
County, Washington; Together with a 25 foot wide strip overlaying the entry road, and a
15 foot by 15 foot area, on either side of the entry road, along the north property line, for
the freestanding sign, as shown on the diagram below.
' Sign
Areas
MT ONLY
Entry Road
Area
i
• PARKING LOT
Q
CITY MANAGER (509) 545-3404 / Fax (509) 545-3403
qlqwP.O.Box 293 (525 North 3rd Avenue) Pasco,Washington 99301
May 20, 2008
Brent Miles, President
Northwest Baseball Ventures I, LLC
6200 Burden Blvd
Pasco, WA 99301
Re: Freestanding Sign at Stadium—Letter of Understanding
Dear Mr. Miles:
This is to formalize our understanding with respect to the freestanding sign that NWBV and
GESA wish to install along Burden Blvd, in order to recognize GESA as the title sponsor for the
baseball stadium.
While our lease agreement provides that NWBV, as tenant, must obtain the City's permission to
make improvements at the stadium,there are no specific provisions regarding the proposed sign.
There are issues that could arise with respect to any sign and the City's plans to market
commercial parcels located north of the parking lot along Burden Blvd. Additionally, there are
potential sign code issues that could come about with the sale of these parcels.
In order to allow NWBV to proceed with plans to complete signage before the summer baseball
season, the City is willing to give its permission for the freestanding sign subject to the following
understanding:
The City and NWBV will execute an amendment to the lease agreement which will include: 1)
an amended lease premises description to include entry (middle) road and area for the
freestanding sign on the side (east or west) designated by NWBV; 2) NWBV understands that
City is attempting to market the commercial land parcels north of the stadium parking lot and
adjacent to Burden Blvd. In the event that removal of the sign to another location is required, in
the sole opinion of the City, for the City to market either of the parcels, NWBV agrees to
relocate the sign, at its sole cost, to a mutually agreeable location along Burden Blvd; and 3) City
agrees to use its best efforts to market the property under terms that do not require sign
relocation.
Brent Miles, President
Northwest Baseball Ventures I, LLC
May 20, 2008
RE: Freestanding Sign at Stadium—Letter of Understanding
Page 2
The freestanding sign will be constructed and erected in conformance with all applicable codes
and shall be substantially as shown in the attached drawing.
Please sign below to indicate your agreement with the terms outlined in this letter of
understanding.
j chfi ,
ager
GC/tlz
attachment
AGREED:
Brent Miles, President Date
Northwest Baseball Ventures I, LLC
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 20, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfi Manager Workshop Mtg.: 5127108
Regular Mtg.: 612108
FROM: Denis Austin, hief of Police
SUBJECT: New Police Officer Position
I. REFERENCE:
A. Addendum to Interagency Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5127 Discussion
6102 MOTION I move to approve the addendum for the Interagency Agreement
with the Pasco School District for School Resource Officer services
and authorize one additional police officer position to be filled as
soon as possible and, further, direct the additional expense be
included in the year-end General Fund Supplemental Budget.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
2008 City of Pasco Funds ..................$ 30,800
2009 City of Pasco Funds ..................$ 28,493
2009 Pasco School District Funds .....$ 64,109
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The commissioned staff of the Police Department provides a variety of services to the
community including officers assigned to schools. School Resource Officers (SRO) are
full-time uniformed police officers primarily dedicated to providing law enforcement
resource services to assigned schools and surrounding neighborhoods. SRO's are
assigned to work normal patrol duties when school is not in session. The School District
has requested to increase in the number of police officers assigned at Pasco High School
from one full-time officer to two full-time officers in order to prepare for the opening of
Chiawana High School in 2009. One of the two positions would be transferred to the
new high school upon its opening.
V. DISCUSSION:
The proposed increase in the police commissioned staffing allocation is necessary to
provide one additional School Resource Officer to Pasco High School beginning January
2009. The selection, hiring, and training of a new officer will require several months to
complete. In order to provide the increased level of service beginning January 2009, the
police department needs one additional police officer position authorized and filled
immediately. Hiring the officer this year for training purposes will cost the City
approximately $30,800 for the balance of 2008. The School District will reimburse the
City for the salary and fringe benefits costs for one officer at the top salary level for
police officer for 1440 hours during 180 school days in 2009. As evidence of their
intention to move forward with the proposed increase in services the School District has
committed to allocating funds to reimburse the City for the wages and benefit costs for
one additional School Resource Officer beginning January 2009.
10(e)
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No. 1 and City of Pasco
Addendum
The purpose of this Addendum is to change items 1. Statement of Work, 3. Period of
Performance, 4. Payment, and 6. Funding. The School District and City requested the
changes to address the addition of a second officer at Pasco High School beginning in
January 2009. This addendum also updates the hourly wage and benefit costs for the
officers assigned to the schools under the term of the Interagency Agreement. This
Addendum modifies the Interagency Agreement by replacing the original contract
language with the following:
1. Statement of Work. The City shall furnish the necessary personnel and services and
otherwise do all things necessary for and incidental to the performance of the work stated
herein. The City shall:
a. Station one full-time uniformed police officer at each of the following
schools during the 180 days when school is in session during the months
of August through June:
(1) Pasco High School (8 hours/day)
(2) Stevens Middle School (8 hours/day)
(3) Ochoa Middle School (8 hours/day)
Beginning January 1, 2009 two full-time uniformed police officers will be
stationed at Pasco High School.
f. Assign one uniformed police officer to instruct the Anti-Harassment and
Bullying Program curriculum in the grade schools within the city limits of
Pasco, with the emphasis being on the fifth grade. The maximum number
of hours the officer is available to train for, prepare, and instruct the anti-
harassment and bullying curriculum is four hundred sixty (460) work
hours or fifty-seven and one-half (57.5) workdays. This work will be
performed during two and one-half (2.5) workdays each week (totaling
twenty hours) for twenty-three (23) school weeks. The scheduled work
hours will be:
(1) Tuesdays and Thursdays (8 hours/day), and
(2) Wednesdays (4 hours/day)
3. Period of Performance. Subject to its other provisions, the period of performance of
this agreement shall commence in August 2008 and be completed in June 2009 unless
terminated sooner as provided herein. Except that work performed by the Officer
Instructor specified in item Lf shall commence in October and be completed in April (23
school weeks) of each school year.
4. Payment. Based upon the negotiated wage agreement between the City and the
police officers collective bargaining unit, the District shall reimburse the City for its
expenses in employing three (3) officers for 180 days, plus one (1) additional officer for
100 days, or a total of 5,120 hours each year of this agreement as follows:
a. For August 2008 through December 2008, an estimated total of eighty-
five thousand four hundred seventy-nine dollars ($85,479) for 1,920 hours
of work.
b. For January 2009 through June 2009, an estimated total of one hundred
forty-six thousand seven hundred fifty-two dollars ($146,752) for 3,200
hours of work.
Actual amounts are to be determined by the parties based upon any negotiated
wage increase between the City and the police officer's collective bargaining unit.
e. Due to early release days and other regularly scheduled non-school days
when an officer's presence is not required for a full eight (8) hours, in
consideration for compensation as stated in section 4 above, the City
agrees to provide officers during the school year for activities outside of
the regularly scheduled school assignment. Requests for an officer's
presence at school activities outside of the officer's regularly scheduled
school assignment during the school year will be compensated separately
at the estimated rate of$44.52 per hour for 2008, and $45.86 per hour for
2009.
6. Funding. In addition to the costs associated with the School Resource Officers,
funding for an officer to instruct anti-harassment and bullying curriculum hereunder shall
be provided by the District in the amount of$20,500.
In Witness whereof, the parties have executed this Addendum effective this day of
2008.
City of Pasco: Pasco School District No. 1
Joyce Olson William Leggett
Mayor President, Board of Education
Attest:
Debbie Clark Saundra L. Hill
City Clerk Superintendent
Approved as to Form:
Leland Kerr Larry Mayfield
City Attorney Assistant Superintendent
Sarah Thornton
School District Counsel
2008 - 2009 Total Cost Estimate
Number of Officers 3
Hourly Rate with Benefits $ 44.52
Total Hourly Rate $ 133.56
Number of Hours Each School Day 8
Number of School Days 80
Total Number of Officer Hours 640
Sub-total of Estimated Cost $ ._ {
ba
Number of Officers 4
Hourly Rate with Benefits (Estimate) $ 45.86
Total Hourly Rate (Estimate) $ 183.44
Number of Hours Each School Day 8
Number of School Days 100
Total Number of Officer Hours 800
Sub-total of Estimated Cost $ *46J-52.00
TOW 5
:.. 2322340
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council May 23, 2008
FROM: Gary Crutchfi ager Workshop Mtg.: 5/27108
Regular Mtg.: 6/2/08
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for Corridor Enhancement Study
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL I STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5127 Discussion
6/2 MOTION: I move to approve the Professional Services Agreement with JUB
Engineers for the Corridor Enhancement Study and, further, authorize
the Mayor to sign the agreement.
III. ' FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Council approved Resolution No. 3053 in December 2007 creating an ad-hoc
committee to update the Gateways and Corridors Plan previously adopted by the
City Council in 1995. The resolution calls for the work to be completed by June
2008.
B) The Planning Division in the Community Development Department has compiled
most of the existing information necessary to initiate the update effort. However,
the recent loss of our Assistant Planner has required the Associate Planner to
assume most of those day-to-day activities, rendering the Associate Planner
unavailable for the committee support.
C) Rather than continue to delay the update effort, staff has arranged for the support
work to be provided through a Professional Services Agreement with JUB
Engineers. It is expected that such an arrangement will permit the work to be
carried out by the committee over the next three months, resulting in the plan
being completed prior to budget formulation.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Although it was originally expected that staff could provide the support necessary
for the committee to complete its work, the staffing circumstances coupled with
the workload has made that unlikely at this point in time. The city's assumption
of the "Local Redevelopment Authority" responsibilities associated with the
Wagenaar Reserve Center has further reduced the staff ability to support the
Corridor Enhancement Study. It is most desirable to complete the enhancement
study prior to budget time (October) so that any appropriate budget
recommendations can be made for 2009 (rather than delaying the implementation
for another budget year).
B) The cost of the support work was not included in the 2008 budget. However, the
Community & Economic Development Director position has not yet been filled;
thus, approximately $50,000 unexpended salary is available to cover the cost of
the support services contract.
C) Staff recommends approval of the agreement.
10(f)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into between the City of Pasco, hereinafter
referred to as the"City," and JUB Engineers, Inc. hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant."
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the professional services and assistance of a
consulting firm to provide urban planning and landscape consultation services with respect to the
City's update of its Gateways and Corridors Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual benefits accruing, it is agreed by and
between the parties hereto as follows:
1. Scope of work. The scope of work shall include all services and material necessary
to accomplish the above mentioned objectives in accordance with Exhibit A.
2. Ownership and use of documents. All research, tests, surveys, preliminary data
and any and all other work product prepared or gathered by the Consultant in preparation for the
services rendered by the Consultant shall not be considered public records, provided, however,
that:
A. All final reports, presentations and testimony prepared by the Consultant
shall become the property of the City upon their presentation to and acceptance by the City and
shall at that date become public records.
B. The City shall have the right, upon reasonable request, to inspect, review
and, subject to the approval of the Consultant, copy any work product.
C. In the event that the Consultant shall default on this Agreement, or in the
event that this contract shall be terminated prior to its completion as herein provided, the work
product of the Consultant, along with a summary of work done to date of default or termination,
shall become the property of the City and tender of the work product and summary shall be a
prerequisite to final payment under this contract. The summary of work done shall be prepared at
no additional cost, if the contract is terminated through default by the contractor. If the contract
is terminated through convenience by the City, the City agrees to pay contractor for the
preparation of the summary of work done.
3. Payments. The Consultant shall be paid by the City for completed work for
services rendered under this Agreement as provided hereinafter. Such payment shall be full
compensation for work performed or services rendered and for all labor, materials, supplies,
equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the work.
A. Payment for work accomplished under the terms of this Agreement shall be
on a time and materials basis as set forth on the fee schedule found in Exhibit A, provided, in no
event shall the payment for all work performed pursuant to this Agreement exceed the sum of
$20,000.
B. All vouchers shall be submitted by the Consultant to the City for payment
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The City shall pay the appropriate amount for each
voucher to the Consultant. The Consultant may submit vouchers to the City monthly during the
progress of the work for payment of completed phases of the project. Billings shall be reviewed
in conjunction with the City's warrant process.
C. The costs records and accounts pertaining to this Agreement are to be kept
available for inspection by representatives of the City for a period of three (3) years after final
payment. Copies shall be made available upon request.
4. Time of performance. The Consultant shall perform the work authorized by this
Agreement promptly and within 120 days.
5. Hold harmless agreement. In performing the work under this contract, the
Consultant agrees to defend the City, their officers, agents, servants and employees (hereinafter
individually and collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), from all suits, claims, demands,
actions or proceedings, and to the extent permissible by law, indemnify and hold harmless the
Indemnitees from
A. All damages or liability of any character including in part costs, expenses
and attorney fees, based upon, any negligent act, error, or omission of Consultant or any person
or organization for whom the Consultant may be responsible, and arising out of the performance
of professional services under this Agreement; and
B. All liability, loss, damage, claims, demands, costs and expenses of
whatsoever nature, including in part, court costs and attorney fees, based upon, or alleged to be
based upon, any act, omission, or occurrence of the Consultant or any person or organization for
whom the Consultant may be responsible, arising out of, in connection with, resulting from or
causee by the performance or failure of performance of any work or services other than
professional services under this Agreement, or from conditions created by the Consultant
performance or non-performance of said work or service, regardless of whether or not caused in
part by the party indemnified hereunder.
6. General and professional liability insurance. The Consultant shall secure and
maintain in full force and effect during performance of all work pursuant to this contract a policy
of comprehensive general liability insurance providing coverage of at least $500,000 per
occurrence and $1,000,000 aggregate for personal injury; $500,000 per occurrence and aggregate
for property damage; and professional liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000. Such
general liability policies shall name the City as an additional insured and shall include a
provision prohibiting cancellation of said policy, except upon thirty (30) days written notice to
the City. The City shall be named as the certificate holder on the general liability insurance.
Certificates of coverage shall be delivered to the City within fifteen (15) days of execution of this
Agreement.
7. Discrimination prohibited. Consultant shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, age, sex, national origin
or physical handicap.
Professional Services Agreement—City of Pasco&JUB Engineers,Inc.
Page 2
8. Consultant is an independent contractor. The parties intend that an independent
contractor relationship will be created by this Agreement. No agent, employee or representative
of the Consultant shall be deemed to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any
purpose. Consultant shall be solely responsible for all acts of its agents, employees,
representatives and subcontractor during the performance of this contract.
4. City approval. Notwithstanding the Consultant's status as an independent
contractor, results of the work performed pursuant to this contract must meet the approval of the
City.
10. Termination. This being an Agreement for professional services, either party
may terminate this Agreement for any reason upon giving the other party written notice of such
termination no fewer than ten (10) days in advance of the effective date of said termination.
11. I_nteeration. The Agreement between the parties shall consist of this document and
the Consultant's proposal attached hereto. These writings constitute the entire Agreement of the
parties and shall not be amended except by a writing executed by both parties. In the event of
any conflict between this written Agreement and any provision of Exhibit A, this Agreement
shall control.
12. Non-waiver. Waiver by the City of any provision of this Agreement or any time
limitation provided for in this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision.
13. Non-assignable. The services to be provided by the contractor shall not be
assigned or subcontracted without the express written consent of the City.
14. Covenant against contingent fees. The Consultant warrants that he has not
employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for
the Consultant, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration contingent upon or
resulting from the award of making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the
City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability or, in its discretion to deduct from
the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee,
commission, percentage,brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.
15. General Provisions. For the purpose of this Agreement, time is of the essence.
Should any dispute arise concerning the enforcement, breach or interpretation of this Agreement,
venue shall be placed in Franklin County, Washington, the laws of the State of Washington shall
apply, and the prevailing parties shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and costs.
Professional Services Agreement—City of Pasco&NB Engineers,Inc.
Page 3
16. Notices. Notices to the City of Pasco shall be sent to the following address:
City of Pasco
Attn: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager
P. O. Box 293
Pasco, WA 99301
Notices to the Consultant shall be sent to the following address:
JUB Engineers, Inc.
Attn: Spencer Montgomery, Project Manager
2810 W. Clearwater Avenue, Suite 201
Kennewick, WA 99336
Receipt of any notice shall be deemed effective three (3) days after deposit of written notice in
the U. S. mails, with proper postage and properly addressed.
Dated this 2nd day of June, 2008
CITY OF PASCO JUB ENGINEERS, INC.
By: By: _
Joyce Olson, Mayor Spencer Montgomery, Project Manager
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debbie Clark, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
Professional Services Agreement—City of Pasco&JUB Engineers, Inc.
Page 4
Exhibit A
Professional Services Agreement
City of Pasco & JUB Engineers, Inc.
Services: Attend committee meetings for direction and work with city staff to update the
Gateways and Corridors Plan. Provide urban planning and landscape/design
advice, draft document revisions and illustrations.
Schedule: Committee meetings should commence in June and the Plan update is
expected to be completed by September 2008. City and Consultant will
prepare work plan to conform to expected schedule.
Fees Schedule: Position Hourly Rate
Project Manager..............................$136.62
Project Planner..................................$85.90
Landscape Architect........................$117.66
Landscape Designer..........................$69.80
Clerical..............................................$45.00
AGENDA REPORT NO. 22
FOR: City Counci DATE: 5/28/08
TO: Gary Crutc t anager WORKSHOP:
REGULAR: 6/2/08
FROM: David I. McDo Id, City Planner
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT: Farming in an R-S-1 Zone (7500 Block of Argent Road)
(DNR) (MF#SP08-001)
I. REFERENCE (S):
A. Report to Planning Commission:
B. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 4/17108 & 5/15108
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to approve the special permit for the location of a farm in the 7500
block of Argent Road as recommended by the Planning Commission.
III. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On April 17, 2008, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider
a special permit application for the location for a farm in the 7500 block of Argent Road.
B. Following conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that with
conditions, it would be appropriate to permit the development of a farm in the 7500 block
of Argent Road. The recommended conditions of approval for the special permit are
contained in the attached Planning Commission report.
C. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received.
V. DISCUSSION:
VI. ADMINISTRATIVE ROUTING:
io(g)
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: SP 08-001 APPLICANT: WA DNR
HEARING DATE: April 17, 2008 Toby McKay
ACTION DATE: May 15, 2008 713 Bowers RD
Ellensburg, WA 98926
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: SPECIAL PERMIT: Farming in an R-S-1 Zone (7500 Block of
W. Argent) (DNR) (MF# SP 08-001)
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: That portion of parcel 117-510-016 located in the SW 1/4
of the SE 1/4 of Section 16, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, W.M.,
in the City of Pasco laying south of the Franklin County Irrigation
District Canal.
General Location: 7500 Blk. of Argent Rd.
Property Size: Approximately 30 acres.
2. ACCESS: The site has access from Argent Rd.
3. UTILITIES: City water is available to the site, and is located in
the Argent right-of-way. Sewer service is located at the
intersection of Road 72 and Argent.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject property is currently zoned
RT (Residential Transition) and is bordered on the south and east
by the City Boundary, on the west by lands zoned R-S-1, and on
the north by lands zoned RT. The land to the west is the site of the
New Pasco High School. The lands to the north and northwest are
in agricultural use. The lands to the south and east are under
Franklin County jurisdiction and are in residential use.
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this
area for low density residential development.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been
issued a determination of nonsignificance in accordance with
review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter
43.21(c) RCW.
ANALYSIS
The applicant, the Department of Natural Resources, has submitted an
application for a farming operation in an effort to perfect the remaining
water rights on the parcel in question.
Pasco has been an agricultural community from its inception.
Considerable acreage devoted to farm fields can be found within the City
limits and such has been the case for many years. Recognizing the
importance of agricultural production to the community as a whole the
City Council specifically established all farm fields within the City as of
1990 as lawfully established non-conforming uses. (Ordinance # 2780)
In 1990 agricultural uses were also added as an unclassified uses in the
zoning regulations and as such required review thorough the Special
Permit process when they are within 1,000 feet of a dwelling or
residential subdivision.
In the early 1990's much of the I-182 corridor area was put into
agricultural production with farming operations still occurring between
recently developed subdivisions. These farms made productive use of the
land and played an important role in preserving water rights for the
community. As irrigation water was applied to the land water rights
became perfected. When development occurs and farms are converted to
land uses as indicated in the Comprehensive Plan the water rights are
required to be transferred to the City. Following the necessary paperwork
the water rights are then converted for community-wide use.
The property has been used in the past, as reported in the School
District Hearing on the adjacent farm, by dirt bikers, four wheelers and
horseback riders. Although the property in question has been vacant for
many years it currently has water rights available, however, the water
rights have not been perfected. The applicant is endeavoring to put the
land into agricultural production to preserve the water rights. The water
rights can only be preserved if they are put to use through agricultural
production or they will be forever lost.
The property is identified in the Comprehensive Plan for low density
residential uses and is currently zoned R-S-1 (Suburban Residential).
2
Farming on the site can only be considered an interim use that can be
easily converted to the intended use when conditions and development
activities warrant full development. Recent growth in Pasco is a good
example of how the conversion process takes place. Most of the
development in the 1-182 corridor over the last ten years has occurred on
lands that were formally developed with farms.
In reviewing this proposal Staff has identified five (5) issues for
consideration by the Planning Commission: 1) dust control; 2) noise; 3)
general farming operations; 4) ground water concerns; and 5) the
eventual conversion to a residential use.
During the initial grading and leveling of the site fugitive dust could
potentially impact adjacent lands if not properly monitored. This impact
would be eliminated once a crop is established. Staff would suggest the
applicant be required to maintain a viable water source on site during
the initial grading and leveling so that during wind events the site can be
managed to prevent dust from leaving the site. During other times of the
year a cover crop can be utilized to control dust.
Often commercial agricultural activities occur at odd hours with the use
of heavy equipment and various chemicals. Development of an
appropriate farm management plan such as the one required for the
adjacent School District would help mitigate any adverse impacts on
surrounding properties.
During the hearing process for the adjacent School District Farm several
neighbors voiced the concerns over ground water contamination from
overwatering during the irrigation season. Again this concern can be
addressed through implementing a farm management plan and
specifying the type of crop to be grown.
Even though the Municipal code makes provisions for commercial
agriculture, the City's comprehensive plan has designated this area for
low density residential development. Therefore farming on the site must
be considered only an interim use. Placing a time limit or a reassessment
date for the farming operation would address the concern of having the
farming operation on the site for an extended period of time.
It should also be mention that the School District prepared a Phase One
Environmental Study and Burrowing Owl Study for the adjacent farm to
the west. A portion of those studies include a survey buffer that covers
the western portion of the site in question.
3
INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff
report. The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this
listing as the result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during
the open record hearing.
1. The site is zoned R-S-1.
2. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the site for future single family
housing development.
3. The site is not designated as a critical area.
4. Commercial agriculture (farms) is listed as unclassified uses in the
zoning regulations.
5. The site is in the Pasco Urban Growth Boundary.
6. The site contains 30 acres.
7. The site is vacant.
8. Testimony for the School district hearing indicated four wheelers,
dirt bike riders, and horseback riders have used the site for many
years for off-road recreation activities.
9. A large commercial farm is located directly north of the site.
10. The subject site is within 1000 ft of a residential zone.
11. The Pasco School District was granted a special permit for a farm
on the property to the west.
12. The School District prepared a Burrowing Owl Report (BOSR) for
the nearby property.
13. The BOSR indicated there were no burrowing owls or important
fish and wildlife habitat on the adjacent school site.
14. The site in question is similar to the adjacent school site but
contains far less shrub vegetation than the school site did.
15. The site is not list as a critical area in the City's Comprehensive
Plan.
16. Much of the property was de-vegetated in the early 1990's in
preparation for the development of a farm.
17. The site is adjacent Argent Road, a major street.
4
18. There are many small irrigated pastures located to the south of the
site.
19. A farm management plan was establish for the School District farm
to address concerns related to farm operations, dust, and ground
water.
20. Developing a farm on the site will secure scarce water rights.
TENTATIVE CONCLUSIONS BASED ON INTIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF
FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a special permit the Planning
Commission must develop findings of fact from which to draw its conclusion
based upon the criteria listed in P.M.C. 25.86.060. The criteria are as
follows:
1) Will the proposed use be in accordance with the goals, policies,
objectives and text of the Comprehensive Plan?
The Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed site for low
density residential development. The proposal is an interim use that
urill preserve the site for uses designated in the Comprehensive
Plan. The proposal also supports Policy LU-3-F that encourages the
use of irrigation water in residential districts and Policy OF 3-B that
calls for the continued expansion of the water system. The proposal
will preserve water rights for the Pasco Community.
2) Will the proposed use adversely affect public infrastructure?
The proposed farm will have no adverse impact on public
infrastructure. A farm is not dependant upon City utilities or
infrastructure as are residential and commercial development.
3) Will the proposed use be constructed, maintained and operated
to be in harmony with existing or intended character of the
general vicinity?
The proposed use will be in harmony with the large commercial farm
to the north and is similar in nature to the many acres of irrigated
pasture Iands and hobby farms to the south. The location of other
farms within the I-182 Corridor has demonstrated that farms within
close proximity of dwellings can be operated harmoniously with
intended uses. Farms have operated simultaneously with the
development of Island Estates, Sunny Meadows, the Village of
5
Pasco Heights, and in harmony with other residential developments
in the I-182 Corridor. The proposed use will not make intensive use
of the land or lead to the disorderly growth of the community.
4) Will the location and height of proposed structures and the site
design discourage the development of permitted uses on property
in the general vicinity or impair the value thereof?
There will be no structures erected with this proposal other than a
pivot in gation system. Development over the last 10 years within
the 1-182 Corridor attests to the fact that farming operations do not
discourage the development of permitted uses or impair the value of
nearby development.
5) Will the operations in connection with the proposal be more
objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes
vibrations, dust, traffic, or flashing lights than would be the
operation of any permitted uses within the district?
Gardening and fruit growing are permitted uses in the R-S-1
district. Farming activities are occurring north of the site. The
proposed use will not create more traffic, flashing lights, fumes,
noise or vibrations than the traffic on Argent Road or activities at
the High School.
6) Will the proposed use endanger the public health or safety if
located and developed where proposed, or in any way will become
a nuisance to uses permitted in the district?
The proposed farm will be compatible with the existing farm to
the north and the pasture ground and hobby farms to the south.
The proposed farm is only an interim use, and will not impede
the development of future uses, nor will it become a nuisance to
future permitted uses. The existence of numerous farming
operations within the I-182 Corridor demonstrates that the
proposed use will not become a nuisance to permitted uses nor
will it endanger public health and safety.
RECOMMENDATION
MOTION for Findings of Fact: I move to adopt findings of
fact and conclusions there from as contained in the May 15,
2008 staff report.
6
MOTION for Recommendation: I move based on the findings
of fact and conclusions there from the Planning Commission
recommend the City Council grant a special permit to the
Department of Natural Resources for a farm in the 7500 block
of West Argent with conditions as contained in the Mayl5, 2008
staff report:
(Proposed) Approval Conditions
(1) The special permit is personal to the applicant;
(2) The farm shall be operated by using best management practices
for agricultural production;
(3) No irrigation water is permitted to be sprayed or otherwise drain
onto the adjoining right-of-way;
(4) Irrigation water and farm chemicals must be applied at
agronomic rates;
(5) The farm crop shall be limited to alfalfa only;
(6) No farm equipment is permitted to be stored on the site;
(7) The property shall be posted to indicate no motorcycling or four
wheeling is permitted;
(8) The water rights preserved with this farming operation shall
remain with the property for future needs within the City of
Pasco;
(9) The special permit shall be valid for a period of 3 years and will
automatically extend to 5 years if the applicant adheres to the
conditions of special permit approval. Extensions beyond the
first five years may require additional review and the granting of
a new special permit if deemed necessary by the City Council,
provided no farming activity shall be permitted beyond June 1,
2018 unless a special permit is granted to do so.
(10) The special permit shall be null and void if farming activity has
not begun by June 30, 2009.
7
y 1 � � "':,w„p!;!'r"'x..x.•W� .,fGt.•. _C_y a,.i.i f .-. erxm
4
Al
Xf
f,• .� +� ;� �.a�� � ,� i" , r '� ti .. fir'. , <�� r
` P.;�,..-.,w,F �S,'1.."`k1o.��A 9A-+,.'f.'c. - '�4'Afs.'V�..•.^a.4+�.� ryii�"�' _""'3 '�5'�'r��' •p�` _r—r�-
Vii.�i r S r�x "`•'� _'�" "r.
Ait-
V-5
+ � 'gyp 4 +::•j •f�j �
� p 6a �
w
z
� U
;J E
Id oz aVON
cn U.
03 V)
(73 oc
o �
v LL,
CA cn
Nil
L Cl OZI
MINIMS
'O
O V
a, O
V � 4w J
O U
V
. .
.{� �
i � .4 ..�.._-._. __.
�„�
� � � , -�
..��
� �. �I -. _
_ __
s
•
� � .. I
• � �
�, � •�
� �
� �' �
•
i �
� �
��� i a
� �
i
�w
f4
I
� '
Planning Commission Minutes
4/17/08
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Special Permit Farming in an R-S-1 Zone De artment of
Natural Resources 7500 Block of Argent)
IMF#SP08-001)
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for a report.
Staff stated that a notice of the hearing was published in the newspaper and
mailed to surrounding property owners.
Staff provided an overview of the proposed project and its location in the 7500
block of W. Argent. The Department of Natural Resources owns the site and has
made application to develop a farm to preserve the water rights. The application
is similar to the Pasco School District application a couple of years ago for
property located west of the site which resulted in the approval of a special
permit for a farm.
The application for a farm near the Road 100 interchanged was also discussed
briefly.
Chairman Samuel asked about the amount of commercial zoning designated in
the comprehensive plan for the Road 100 area.
Staff explained that about 100 acres were designated in the Comprehensive Plan
for commercial development near Road 100. The propose site is zoned and
classified as a low density residential.
Chairman Samuel questioned the proper amount of property for growth.
Staff stated one of the differences between the current site and the Road 100 site
is the existence of a major gas line that runs diagonally through the property
making it more difficult to develop.
Commissioner Rose questioned the type of agriculture that would be developed
on this property.
Commissioner Cruz questioned the length of time involved in perfecting water
rights.
Staff stated about two years. The property has to be put to a beneficial use, such
as growing and harvesting a crop.
Chairman Samuel asked if any complaints had been received from neighbors of
current farms (nearby) concerning sand, noise or dust control.
Staff replied they were not aware of any complaints.
Chairman Samuel referenced the Linda Loviisa farm.
Staffs explained due to the wind patterns there have been complaints about
blowing dust from the farm located where Linda Loviisa is being built.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing.
Linda Clatterbuck, 3001 Road 72, stated she was in favor of agriculture use
with a constant covered crop. She was however concerned about the storage of
farm equipment. The appearance of farm machinery at the fruit stand on Court
Street is not very appealing.
Staff explained that the fruit stand on Court Street is located in the County and
did not receive permission from the City to store machinery in plain view. The
fruit stand farm is a different type of farm than the proposed farm and as a
result no machinery will be stored on site.
Chairman Samuel addressed Ms. Clatterbuck's concern regarding the proposed
crop for this property by explaining the School District's farm was restricted to
certain crops.
Bruce Clatterbuck, 3001 Road 72, stated he had a genuine concern regarding
groundwater contamination and would prefer a perennial grass or alfalfa crop.
He wanted to see a low pressure irrigation system be installed.
Chairman Samuel questioned Mr. Clatterbuck as to whether there were any
proof regarding high levels of nitrates being caused by the farms already in the
area.
Mr. Clatterbuck stated no, but there was a lengthy study that the Conservation
District did a few years ago about nitrates in West Pasco. Clatterbuck stated he
was a former employee of the USDA and is pro-farming.
Tom Kidwell, 4320 Riverhaven, explained he was the farmer on the Pasco School
district property to the west and on the DNR land to the north of the FCID canal.
The School District farm was planted with alfalfa and oats for dust control
purposes.
Commissioner Little asked how long Mr. Kidwell intended to farm the site and
what crop would be used
Mr. Kidwell stated there would be a 5-year timeframe. His intention was to plant
alfalfa.
Commissioner Little questioned the timeframe expected to recover costs and
protect the water rights.
Mr. Kidwell stated 3-5 years, if 3 years was granted he would request an
extension.
Linda Clatterbuck, 3001 Road 72, further recommended the pivot area not be
used for storage.
Staff requested some direction from the Planning Commission for
recommendations regarding conditions on timeframes, farm management plans,
and equipment storage.
Commissioner Cruz stated he would like to recommend that no equipment be
stored longer than 30 days.
Following three calls for further testimony Chairman Samuel closed the hearing.
Commissioner Anderson recommended the timeframe be a minimum of 3 years
with an extension to 5 years with an annual review each year after that. In
reference to the equipment storage, he mentioned the equipment used for the
farm on the Pasco School District property was only at the property to cut and
bale the hay. The hay was stored on the property in an area with easy access for
trucks.
Commissioner Little questioned if there would be a fee for each additional
review.
Staff stated the special permit fee was $450.
Commissioner Anderson suggested that if no problems existed or if there were
no development plans that the time limit could be extend to 5 years.
Commissioner Rose suggested that the approved agriculture use contain a year-
round stabilization of the soil.
Commissioner Cruz questioned the prohibition of livestock uses with the main
concern being the accelerated levels of nitrates.
Commissioner Rose did not object to use of the land for a pasture.
Commissioner Anderson moved, seconded by Commissioner Hay, to close the
hearing on the proposed special permit and initiate deliberations and schedule
adoption of findings of fact, inclusions and a recommendation to the City
Council for the May 15, 2008 meeting. The motion carried unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes
5/15/08
OLD BUSINESS:
A. SPECIAL PERMIT FARMING IN A R-S-1 ZONE DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES) (7500 BLOCK OF
ARGENT) (MF #SP08-001)
Chairman Samuel introduced the item and explained that it had been presented
at the previous meeting and public comment had been received at that time. No
further public comments will be taken during the deliberations.
Chairman Samuel asked if there were any comments from staff.
Staff explained that during the hearing, discussion centered on the use of the
property for the storage of farm equipment, increases in nitrate levels due to
irrigation and time frames for operation of the farm. Staff then reviewed the
proposed list of conditions contained in the written report.
Staff asked the Planning Commission if the proposed conditions addressed the
issues discussed at the prior meeting.
Chairman Samuel and the Planning Commission stated yes.
Chairman Samuel stated the approval conditions addressed the questions on
the farm. The Planning Commission received good input from citizens that live
around the proposed farm and those comments were incorporated into the
approval conditions.
Commissioner Little moved seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the
Planning Commission adopt the findings of fact and conclusions as contained in
the May 15, 2008 staff report. The motion was unanimously approved.
Commissioner Little moved based on the findings of fact as adopted seconded by
Commissioner Anderson that the Planning Commission recommend the City
Council grant a special permit to the Department of Natural Resources for a
farm in the 7500 block of West Argent with conditions as contained in the May
15, 2008 staff report. The motion was approved unanimously.
Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action at the
first regular meeting in June, 2008. An appeal of the recommendation would
cause a closed record hearing to be held before the City Council.