HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008.05.05 Council Meeting Packet AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting 7:00 p.m. May 5,2008
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL:
(a) Pledge of Allegiance.
3. CONSENT AGENDA: All items listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the
City Council and will be enacted by roll call vote as one motion(in the form listed below). There will be
no separate discussion of these items. If further discussion is desired by Councilmembers or the public,
the item may be removed from the Consent Agenda to the Regular Agenda and considered separately.
(a) Approval of Minutes:
1. Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated April 21, 2008.
(b) Bills and Communications: (A detailed listing of claims is available for review in the Finance
Manager's office.)
1. To approve General Claims in the amount of $1,329,885,49 ($103,965.88 in the form of
Wire Transfer Nos. 4958 and 4961 and, $1,225,919.61 consisting of Claim Warrants
numbered 165631 through 165861).
2. To approve Payroll Claims in the amount of $1,747,208.08, Voucher Nos. 37783 through
37895; and EFT Deposit Nos. 30022577 through 30023074.
*(c) Resolution No. 3076, a Resolution accepting work performed by A&B Asphalt under contract
for the Court Street Widening (Road 68-Road 84),Phase 1,Project No. 07-3-01.
1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated April 28, 2008.
2. Resolution.
To approve Resolution No. 3076, accepting the work performed by A&B Asphalt, Inc., under
contract for the Court Street Widening(Road 68-Road 84), Phase 1, Project No. 07-3-01.
wo MOTION: I move to approve the Consent Agenda as read.
4. PROCLAMATIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
(a) "Yard of the Month" Awards. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA) The following
Pasco residents have been invited to attend the Council meeting to receive Certificates of
Appreciation from Mayor Joyce Olson for"Yard of the Month," April 2008.
1. Raul and Linda De La Mora, 931 W. Marie Street
2. John and Gayle Womak, 139 Willow Circle
3. Jim and Anna Sedgwick, 7 Marigold Loop
4. Joe and Ruth Welden, 7608 Bonilla Drive
(b) "Business of the Month" Appearance Award. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA)
The following Pasco business has been invited to attend the Council meeting to receive a
Certificate of Appreciation from Mayor Joyce Olson for "Business of the Month Appearance
Award"for April 2008.
1. Master Barbers, 120 N. 5'h Avenue
(c) Presentation of Proclamation for "Child Care Providers Appreciation Day." Mayor Joyce
Olson to present Proclamation to Benton Franklin Community Action Committee Executive
Director, Judith Gidley and Family Development Coordinator,Joy White.
(d) Presentation of Proclamation for "National Police Week" and "Peace Officers' Memorial
Day." Mayor Joyce Olson to present Proclamation to Denis Austin, Chief of Police, Pasco
Police Department.
5. VISITORS- OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS:
(a) Pasco Public Facilities District Annual Report. (NO WRITTEN MATERIAL ON AGENDA)
Presented by Bob Tippett, Pasco Public Facilities District Board President.
(b)
(c)
Regular Meeting 2 May 5,2008
6. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
(a) Verbal Reports from Councilmembers
(b)
(c)
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND COUNCIL ACTION ON ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
RELATING THERETO:
(None)
8. ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS:
*(a) Ordinance No. , an Ordinance of the City of Pasco, Washington, amending the Zoning
Classification of Short Plat 2008-09, R-S-1 (Suburban Residential) to R-1 (Low Density
Residential) with a concomitant Agreement.
1. Agenda Report from David 1. McDonald, City Planner dated May 1, 2008.
2. Proposed Rezone Ordinance.
3. Planning Commission Report.
4. Planning Commission Minutes dated 3/20/08 and 4/17/08.
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. ' granting a rezone for Short Plat 2008-09
from R-1-S to R-1 with a concomitant agreement as recommended by the Planning Commission
and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
(b) Ordinance No. , an Ordinance amending Title 12 dealing with sidewalk and driveway
improvements.
1. Agenda Report from David 1. McDonald, City Planner dated May 1, 2008.
2. Proposed Ordinance.
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , amending PMC Title 12 dealing with
sidewalks and driveways and, further,to authorize publication by summary only.
(c) Ordinance No. an Ordinance reducing the membership of the Senior Services
Advisory Committee.
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated May 1, 2008,
2. Memorandum from A&CS Director dated 4/22/08.
3. Proposed Ordinance.
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , reducing the membership of the Senior
Services Advisory Committee and, further, authorize publication by summary only.
(d) Resolution No. , a Resolution establishing primary goals of the City of Pasco for the
ensuing calendar years 2008-2009.
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated April 22, 2008.
2. Proposed Resolution.
MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. establishing primary goals for the
city for calendar years 2008-2009.
9. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
(None)
10. NEW BUSINESS:
*(a) 2008 Sewer Lining Project No. 08-1-04:
1. Agenda Report from Michael McShane, City Engineer dated April 30, 3008.
2. Bid Summary.
3. Vicinity Map,
(RQ MOTION: I move to award the low bid including alternate area 4 for the 2008 Sewer Lining
Project No. 08-1-04 to Insituform Technologies, Inc., in the amount of$409,725.98 including tax
and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the contract documents.
11. MISCELLANEOUS DISCUSSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
12. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Regular Meeting 3 May 5,2008
13. ADJOURNMENT.
(RC) Roll Call Vote Required
* Item not previously discussed
MF# "Master File#...."
Q Quasi-Judicial Matter
REMINDERS:
1. 6:00 p.m., Friday, May 2, TRAC -- Hispanic Academic Achievers Program. (COUNCILMEMBER
MATT WATKINS)
2. 11:00 a.m., Saturday, May 3, Downtown Pasco -- Cinco de Mayo Parade (staging at 2nd & Columbia
Streets at 9:00 a.m.). (MAYOR JOYCE OLSON, COUNCILMEMBERS TOM LARSEN and AL
YENNEY)
3. 1:30 p.m., Monday, May 5, KGH—Emergency Medical Services Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER
TOM LARSEN, Rep.; AL YENNEY,Alt.)
4. 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, May 7, 2601 N. Capitol Avenue — Franklin County Mosquito Control District
Board Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; AL YENNEY, Alt.)
5. 7:00 a.m.,Thursday,May 8, Cousin's Restaurant—BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee Meeting.
(COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN,Rep.; TOM LARSEN,Alt.)
6. 7:00 p.m., Thursday, May 8, Transit Facility — Ben-Franklin Transit Board Meeting.
(COUNCILMEMBER MATT WATKINS,Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.)
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL APRIL 21, 2008
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Joyce Olson, Mayor.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers present: Rebecca Francik, Michael Garrison, Robert Hoffmann, Tom
Larsen, Joyce Olson, Matt Watkins and Al Yenney.
Staff present: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager; Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney; Stan
Strebel, Administrative & Community Services Director; Bob Alberts, Public Works
Director; David McDonald, City Planner; Michael McShane, City Engineer; Denis
Austin, Police Chief and Greg Garcia, Fire Chief.
The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance.
CONSENT AGENDA:
(a) Approval of Minutes:
Minutes of the Pasco City Council Meeting dated April 7, 2008.
(b) Bills and Communications:
To approve General Claims in the amount of$2,276,651.77 ($76,040.20 in the form of
Wire Transfer Nos. 4949 and 4954 and, $2,200,611.57 consisting of Claim Warrants
numbered 165404 through 165630).
To approve bad debt write-offs for utility billing, ambulance, cemetery, general accounts,
miscellaneous accounts and Municipal Court non-criminal, criminal and parking accounts
receivable in the total amount of$193,472.89 and, of that amount, authorize $136,392.35
be turned over for collection.
(c) Appointments to Code Enforcement Board:
To reappoint Lisa Geming to Position No. 3; appoint Dennis Duncan to Position No. 4;
and reappoint Mary Gutierrez to Position No. 5 (all with the expiration date of 1/l/10) to
the Code Enforcement Board.
(d) Final Plat—Montgomery Estates,Phase 5 (Copper Basin INC) (MF#FP08-
004):
To approve the final plat for Montgomery Estates, Phase 5.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the Consent Agenda as read. Mr. Garrison
seconded. Motion carried by unanimous Roll Call vote.
REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES AND/OR OFFICERS:
Mr. Garrison reported on the Hanford Communities Governing Board meeting and the
Council Retreat.
Mr. Hoffmann attended the BFWW Counties Good Roads and Transportation
Association meeting and commented on the movie `Expelled.'
Mr. Larsen reported on the Benton-Franklin Council of Governments Board meeting and
the Council retreat.
Mr. Yenney attended the PDDA Board meeting and Council retreat.
Mr. Watkins thanked staff and Council for their participation at the Council Retreat.
1 3(a).l
MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING PASCO CITY COUNCIL APRIL 21, 2008
Mayor Olson attended the quarterly Franklin County Emergency Management Board
meeting.
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS NOT RELATING TO PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Resolution No. 3075, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Pasco,
Washington, relating to City street improvements; declaring its intention to order
the improvement of approximately 1300 feet of each of Road 90 and Road 92 north
of Sandifur Parkway and to create a local improvement district to assess the cost
and expense of carrying out those improvements against the properties specially
benefited thereby; and, notifying all persons who desire to object to the
improvements to appear and present their objections at a hearing before the City
Council to be held on May 19, 2008.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve Resolution No. 3075, declaring Council's
intention to create LID 144 and, further, to set Monday, May 19, 2008 at 7:00 p.m., for a
Public Hearing on this matter in the Pasco City Council Chambers. Mr. Garrison
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Ordinance No. 3859, an Ordinance relating to building permit fees by amending
Section 3.07.030 "Building Permits" and Section 16.04.035 "Addition of IBC Section
108.3.1" of the Pasco Municipal Code.
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to adopt Ordinance No. 3859, relating to building permit
fees and, further, authorize publication by summary only. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion
carried 5-2.No—Larsen, Yenney.
NEW BUSINESS:
Sewage Lift Station Easement:
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to approve the Sewage Lift Station Easement agreement
with the Port and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. Mr. Garrison
seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
Fire Station No. 83 Vehicle Storage Project:
MOTION: Mr. Watkins moved to accept Design Option A for the Fire Station No. 83
Vehicle Storage Project provided by Winthrop Construction, Inc., in the amount of
$353,058.00 including sales tax and, further, authorize staff to issue a change order
reflecting the alternate. Mr. Garrison seconded. Motion carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
Joyce Olson, Mayor Sandy Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk
PASSED and APPROVED this 5th day of May, 2008.
2
CITY OF PASCO
Council Meeting of:
May 5, 2008
Accounts Payable Approved
The City Council
City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington
We,the unde tthe reby c ify under penalty of perjury that the materials have been furnished,the
services rend abor perf rmed as described herein and that the claim is a just, due and unpaid
obligation ag and that a are authorized to authenticate and certify to said aim.
,
Gary Crutc iel , ity an a James W. C se, Finance Manager
We,the undersigned ity Councilmembers of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County, Washington,
do hereby certify that the merchandise or services hereinafter specified have been received;that Wire Transfer
No.s 4958 and 4961 in the amount of$103,965.88, have been authorized; that Check No.s 165631 through
165861 are approved for payment in the amount of$1,225,919.61, for a combined total of$1,329,885.49 on this
5th day of May,2008.
Councilmember Councilmember
SUMMARY OF CLAIMS/WIRE TRANSFERS BY FUND:
GENERALFUND:
Legislative 1,165.20
Judicial 3,237.28
Executive 5,726.67
Police 299,220.56
Fire 15,664.02
Administration&Community Services 43,858.18
Community Development 45,368.63
Engineering 19,164.27
Non-Departmental 130,200.34
Library 92,069.53
TOTAL GENERAL FUND: 655,674.68
STREET 5,634.58
C. D. BLOCK GRANT 53914
KING COMMUNITY CENTER 895.21
AMBULANCE SERVICE 33,903.42
CEMETERY 199.26
ATHLETIC PROGRAMS 548.35
SENIOR CENTER 2,927.87
MULTI MODAL FACILITY 1,890.63
SPECIAL ASSESSMNT LODGING 13,764.21
LITTER CONTROL 2,655.27
REVOLVING ABATEMENT 200.00
TRI CITY ANIMAL CONTROL 42,271.06
TRAC DEVELOPMENT 12,500.00
STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER 6,684.62
PUBLIC FACILITIES DIST 24,696.21
METRO DRUG TASK FORCE 1,299.78
METRO DRUG FORFEITURE FUND 1,312.34
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION 4,502.61
WATER/SEWER 315,752.36
EQUIPMENT RENTAL- OPERATING 17,280.58
EQUIPMENT RENTAL- REPLACEMENT 8,139.37
MEDICAL/DENTAL INSURANCE 132,928.23
CENTRAL STORES 679.89
FIRE PENSIONS 5,749.13
PAYROLL CLEARING 37,085.45
LID CONSTRUCTION 171.24
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS: $ 1,329,885.49
3(b).1
CITY OF PASCO
Council Meeting of:
Payroll Approval May 5,2008
The City Council
City of Pasco
Franklin County, Washington
The followi is a summary of payroll claims against the City of Pasco for the month of
April 2008 whic re presented ewi for your review and approval.
Gary . Cr chfield eager James W. Chase, Financial Services Manager
We,the undersigned City Council members of the City Council of the City of Pasco, Franklin County,
Washington, do hereby certify that the services represented by the below expenditures have been received
and that payroll voucher No's. 37783 through 37895 and EFT deposit No's. 30022577 through 30023074
and City contributions in the aggregate amount of$1,747,208.08 are approved for payment on this
5th day of May 2008.
Councilmember Councilmember
SUMMARY OF PAYROLL BY FUND
GENERAL FUND:
Legislative $ 6,683.50
Judicial 62,488.31
Executive 47,326.21
Police 512,341.03
Fire 273,273.59
Administrative &Community Services 234,163.26
Community Development 49,282.07
Engineering 75,514.73
TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,261,072.70
CITY STREET 33,132.13
BLOCK GRANT 11,745.83
MARTIN LUTHER KING CENTER 5,239.89
AMBULANCE SERVICE FUND 130,348.81
CEMETERY 9,847.05
ATHLETIC FUND 2,814.86
SENIOR CENTER 12,864.89
STADIUM OPERATIONS 0.00
MULTI-MODAL FACILITY 176.82
BOAT BASIN 73.54
REVOLVING ABATEMENT FUND 0.00
TASK FORCE 8,204.50
WATER/SEWER 248,120.29
EQUIPMENT RENTAL-OPERATING 23,566.77
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS $ 1,747,208.08
Payroll Summary
Net Payroll 953,446.54
Employee Deductions 415,401.10
Gross Payroll 1,368,847.64
City of Pasco Contributions 378,360.44
Total Payroll $ 1,747,208.08
3(b).2
AGENDA REPORT NO. 19
FOR: City Council April 28, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfield, Ci ger
Robert J. Alb rks Director
FROM: Michael McShafy Engineer Regular Mtg.: May 5, 2008
SUBJECT: Accept Court Street Widening(Road 68 - Road 84), Phase I Project#07-3-01
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL /STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
05105: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. accepting the work
performed by A&B Asphalt, Inc. under contract for the Court Street
Widening(Road 68 -Road 84), Phase I Project#07-3-01.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Arterial Street Fund
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) On April 16, 2007, Council awarded the Court Street Widening (Road 68 - Road
84), Phase I Project #07-3-01 to A&B Asphalt for $1,296,310.65, including
applicable sales tax.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The final project cost was $1,331,179.15. The overage was due mostly to the
addition of a fence on top of the retaining wall on Road 84 to address safety
concerns, and some additional grading for the new sidewalk.
The work is now complete and staff recommends acceptance of this work.
3(c)
RESOLUTION NO. 3()-7LP
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED BY A&B ASPHALT UNDER
CONTRACT FOR THE COURT STREET WIDENING (ROAD 68 - ROAD 84), PHASE I
PROJECT#07-3-01.
WHEREAS, the work performed by A&B ASPHALT, under contract for the Court
Street Widening (Road 68 - Road 84), Phase I Project #07-3-01, has been examined by
Engineering and has been found to be in apparent compliance with the applicable project
specifications and drawings, and
WHEREAS, it is Engineering recommendation that the City of Pasco formally accept the
contractor's work and the project as complete; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, that the
City Council concurs with Engineering recommendation and thereby accepts the work performed
by A&B ASPHALT, under contract for the Court Street Widening (Road 68 - Road 84), Phase I
Project #07-3-01, as being completed in apparent conformance with the project specifications
and drawings, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notify the Washington
State Department of Revenue of this acceptance, and
Be It Further Resolved, that the final payment of retainage being withheld pursuant to
applicable laws, regulations and administrative determination shall be released upon satisfaction
of same and verification thereof by the Public Works Director and Finance Manager.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of , 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy L. Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr
Deputy City Clerk City Attorney
AGENDA REPORT NO. 16
FOR: City Council May 1, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfie anager REGULAR: 5/5/08
FROM: David I. McDo ald, City PlanneiDrq e'
SUBJECT: REZONE- R-S-1 to R-1 in the 3300 Block of Wernett Rd (All Pro Contracting)
(MF#Z-08-001)
1. REFERENCEfS):
A. Proposed Rezone Ordinance
B. Planning Commission Report
C. Planning Commission Minutes: Dated 3/20/08 &4/17/08
11. ACTION RE UESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. granting a rezone for Short
Plat 2008-09, from R-1-S to R-1 with a concomitant agreement as
recommended by the Planning Commission and, further, authorize
publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. On April 17, 2008 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to determine
whether or not to recommend a rezone from R-I-S (Suburban Residential) to R-1 (Low
Density Residential)for a parcel located in the 3300 Block of Wernett Rd.
B. Following the conduct of a public hearing, the Planning Commission reasoned that
with conditions it would be appropriate to recommend a change in zoning for the
property in question.
C. No written appeal of the Planning Commission's recommendation has been received.
V. DISCUSSION:
8(a)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Pasco, Washington, Amending the Zoning
Classification of Short Plat 2008-09, R-S-1 (Suburban
Residential) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) with a
Concomitant Agreement.
WHEREAS, a complete and adequate petition for change of zoning classification has
been received and an open record hearing having been conducted by the Pasco Planning
Commission upon such petition; and,
WHEREAS,that the effect of the requested change in zoning classification shall not be
materially detrimental to the immediate vicinity; and,
WHEREAS, based upon substantial evidence and demonstration of the Petitioner, that:
(A) the requested change for the zoning classification is consistent with the adopted
Comprehensive Plan; (B) the requested change in zoning classification is consistent with or
promotes the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan serving the general public
interest in the community; and (C) there has been a change in the neighborhood or
community needs or circumstances warranting the requested change of the zoning
classification and (D) the request for change in zoning classification is categorically exempt
under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act, NOW,THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the Zoning Ordinance for the City of Pasco, Washington, and the Zoning
Map, accompanying and being part of said Ordinance shall be and hereby is changed from
R-S-1 (Suburban Residential) to R-1 (Low Density Residential) for the real property as
shown in the Exhibit"1"attached hereto and described as follows:
Short Plat 2008-09
Section 2. That the change of a zoning classification as provided in Section I is
contingent, and conditioned upon execution and compliance with a Concomitant Agreement
entered into between the Petitioner and the City which will attach to and run with the real
property described in Section 1 above. Said Concomitant Agreement is attached to this
Ordinance as Exhibit No. "2".
Section 3, This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after its approval,
passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington, and approved as
provided by law this 5th day of May 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk Leland B.Kerr, City Attorney
"Exhibit # 2"
CONCOMITANT ZONING AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco, Washington, a non-charter code city, under the laws
of the State of Washington (Chapter 35A.63 R.C.W. and Article 11, Section I1 of the
Washington State Constitution) has authority to enact laws and enter into agreements to
promote the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, and thereby control the use and
development of property within its jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the Owner(s) of certain property have applied for a rezone of such
property described below within the City's jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, the City pursuant to R.C.W. 43.12(c), the State Environmental Policy
Act, should mitigate any adverse impacts which might result because of the proposed rezone;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco and the Owner(s) are both interested in compliance
with the Pasco Municipal Code provisions relating to the use and development of property
situated in the City of Pasco, described as follows:
Short Plat 2008-09
WHEREAS, the Owner(s) have indicated willingness to cooperate with the City of
Pasco, its Planning Commission and Planning Department to insure compliance with the
Pasco Zoning Code, and all other local, state and federal laws relating to the use and
development of the above described property; and
WHEREAS, the City, in addition to civil and criminal sanctions available by law,
desires to enforce the rights and interests of the public by this concomitant agreement, NOW,
THEREFORE,
In the event the above-described property is rezoned by the City of Pasco to R-1 (Low
Density Residential) and in consideration of that event should it occur, and subject to the
terms and conditions hereinafter stated, the applicant does hereby covenant and agree as
follows:
1. The Owner(s) promise to comply with all of the terms of the agreement in the
event the City, as full consideration herein grants a rezone on the above-described property.
2. The Owner(s)agrees to perform the terms set forth in Section 4 of this agreement.
3. This agreement shall be binding on their heirs, assigns, grantees or successors in
interest of the Owner(s) of the property herein described.
4. Conditions:
The minimum lot size for all lots shall not be less than 8,000 square
feet.
cc
The person(s) whose names are subscribed herein do hereby certify that they are the
sole holders of fee simple interest in the above-described prop r
Owners:
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss.
County of Franklin }
On this day personally appeared before me
f¢v 'q L. /3 u j'j c jL( to me known to be the individual(s) who
executed the within and foregoing instrument on the lines above their/his typed names and
acknowledged they/he signed the as their/his free and voluntary act and deed
for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
Given under my hand and o 'al seal of day of
2008.
Fvpoinimen!ary Pu�UC Notary Public in and for the tate
Mv Stole was, r�to of Washington, residing at V1 WV.
NNa
Expires Jur 2 201
The person(s) whose names are subscribed herein do hereby certify that they are the
sole holders of fee simple interest in the above-described prope
Owner:
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss.
County of Franklin )
On this day personally appeared before me
,Crr� _L r(r rt r �G-1 to me known to be
the r/ of the corporation that executed the
within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that said instrument to be the free and
voluntary act and deed of said corporation for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and
on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument.
Given under my hand and official seal thi day of ,
2
Notary Public
state of wasnington No Public fin- and for the tate
JHOANNA R JONES of Washington, residing at t�o biUR •i�
My Appointment Expires Jun 2, 2010
qW RV
CONCOMITANT ZONING AGREEMENTPAGE 2 OF 3
D
I
1 RON
1
CITY OF PASCO
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE NO. , rezones SP 2008-09,from R-S-i (Suburban
Residential)to R-1 (Low Density Residential) with a Concomitant Agreement.
The full text of Ordinance No. , is available free of charge to any person who
requests it from the City Clerk of the City of Pasco (509) 545-3402, P.O. Box 293, Pasco,
Washington 99301.
Sandy Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk
REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION
MASTER FILE NO: Z 08-001 APPLICANT: All Pro Contracting INC.
HEARING DATE: 03/20/08 4514 W 9th Ave.
ACTION DATE: 04/ 17/08 Kennewick, WA 99336
BACKGROUND
REQUEST: A site-specific Rezone of a 5.12 Acre parcel from R-S-1 (Residential
Suburban) to R-1 (Low Density Residential).
1. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Legal: A 5.12 acre portion of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 24, Township 9 North, Range 29 East, WM lying
southerly of SR-182 Right-of-Way.
General Location: Just west of the intersection of Wernett and RD 32.
Property Size: Approximately 5.12 acres
2. ACCESS: The property has access from Wernett.
3. UTILITIES: All municipal utilities are available to the site.
4. LAND USE AND ZONING: The subject parcel is currently zone R-S-1
and occupied by one house. The subject parcel is bounded by I-182 on
the North and Wernett on the South. Property to the west is zoned R-S-1
and occupied by two duplexes, a house, and a vineyard. Properties to the
south are zoned R-S-1, and are developed with single family dwellings. A
few scattered multi-family dwellings are also located in the general
vicinity. The property to the east is occupied by one house and is zoned
R-S-1.
5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area
for Low Density Residential development.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This proposal has been issued a
determination of nonsignificance in accordance with review under the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21(c) RCW.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is currently zoned R-S-1 (Suburban Residential) which
allows for a minimum lot size of 1 residence per 10,000 square feet.
Surrounding properties to the west and east are similarly zoned. Properties to
the south are zoned R-S-12 which allows a minimum lot size of 12,000 square
feet. The applicant is requesting the property be rezoned to R-1 (Low Density
Residential) which permits minimum lot sizes of 7,200 square feet.
In determining if a zone change is appropriate for the subject parcel the
Planning Commission should, among other things, consider the following
issues: 1) the current density of existing development in the immediate vicinity
of the subject property; and, 2) the comprehensive plan future land use
designation of the property and surrounding areas.
Reviewing the general neighborhood surrounding the site, Staff found that
parcels directly to the southwest (Newton Addition) of the site averaged 7,200
square feet in size. The Newton Addition is 3.7 acres and contains 19 lots for a
density of 5.1 units per acre. Parcels to the south have average lot sizes of
12,000 square feet, and parcels to the southeast average 11,000 sq ft; however
several of the parcels to the southeast contain multi-family units which
produce an actual density of approximately 1 dwelling unit per 5500 sq ft.
There are two duplexes directly west of the site and three duplexes are located
on the south side of Wernett at the southeast corner of the site. Other
duplexes, a four-plex and a tri-plex are located nearby.
The current Comprehensive Land Use Map designates the subject property and
all surrounding properties for low density development. Pursuant to Section
CP.3.15 of the Comprehensive Plan the low density residential designation
allows a net density of 2-5 units per acre. Zones consistent with this
designation include R-S-20, R-S-12, R-S-1, and R-1. Thus, changing the zoning
of the subject property to R-1 would be consistent with the Comprehensive
Land Use Designation of the Plan.
The initial review criteria for considering a rezone application are explained in
PMC. 25.88.030. The criteria are listed below as follows:
1. The changed conditions in the vicinity which warrant other or additional
zoning:
• Sewer service is now available in the neighborhood
• All properties to the south and southeast are fully developed with a
variety of housings type, single family units being the predominate
type.
• The Newton Addition directly across Wernett to the southwest was
developed with 7,200 square foot lots.
• Duplex units are located to the east and west of the site.
• Many of the streets in the neighborhood have been rebuilt to a
higher standard in the last 10 years.
• The water system was upgraded in the neighborhood within the
last 10 years
2
2. Facts to justify the change on the basis of advancing the public health,
safety and general welfare.
The rezone will enhance development opportunities that may lead to the
development of low density single family homes which will eliminate the
potential fire hazards created by the current vacant field. The low density
character of the area will be maintained and future development will
participate in the costs previously incurred by the community for the
water and sewer system that serve the parcel. The general welfare will be
support by additional in-fill development that will contribute to the cost
of municipal services.
3. The effect it will have on the nature and value of adjoining property and
the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed rezone is supported by the comprehensive plan and would
be considered a proper implementation of the plan. The proposed rezone
would protect the established character of the nearby neighborhoods and
thereby the nature and value of the neighboring properties.
The proposal could enhance development of the site and lead to the
elimination of a large field that grows weeds and grasses that can be
considered a fire hazard for adjoining residential structures.
4. The effect on the property owners if the request is not granted.
The proposed rezone will permit the future development cost for the site,
including any sound walls along the freeway, to be spread more
reasonably over a few additional lots.
S. The Comprehensive land use designation for the property.
The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for low density residential
development. The proposed rezone is for low density residential
consistent with the Plan.
INITIAL STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Findings of fact must be entered from the record. The following are initial
findings drawn from the background and analysis section of the staff report.
The Planning Commission may add additional findings to this listing as the
result of factual testimony and evidence submitted during the open record
hearing.
1) The site is zoned R-S-1 (Suburban Residential).
3
2) The Comprehensive Plan designates the site Low Density Residential
development, which allows a net density of 2-5 units per acre.
3) R-1 zoning is identified as Low Density Residential in the zoning
regulations.
4) R-1 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Designation of
Low Density Residential for the site.
5) Most properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcel are
developed with single family dwellings
6) Duplex units are located directly west and east of the site and other multi-
family units are located nearby.
7) The Newton Addition across Wernett was developed with 7,200 square foot
lots matching the minimum lot size for the R-1 District.
8) The Newton Addition is developed at a density of 5. 1 units per acre.
CONCLUSIONS BASED ON STAFF FINDINGS OF FACT
Before recommending approval or denial of a rezone the Planning Commission
must develop its conclusions from the findings of fact based upon the criteria
listed in P.M.C. 25.88.060. The criteria are as follows:
(1) The proposal is in accord with the goals and policies of the
comprehensive plan.
The goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan encourage the
development of old and new neighborhoods into safe and enjoyable
places to live.
(2) The effect of the proposal on the immediate vicinity will not be
materially detrimental.
The surrounding properties will not be detrimentally impacted by the
proposed change because the land will be able to be developed with
similar land uses at similar densities that are compatible with one
another.
(3) There is merit and value in the proposal for the community as a
whole.
4
Rezoning the property to R-1 will allow it to develop with residences
at a density consistent with the surrounding neighborhood (Newton
Addition) and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
(4) Conditions should be imposed in order to mitigate any significant
adverse impacts from the proposal.
There are no significant adverse impacts expected from this zone
change, as such, no conditions are required at this time.
(5) A concomitant agreement should be entered into between the City
and the petitioner, and if so, the terms and conditions of such an
agreement.
The neighborhood contains a variety of housing and varying lots
sizes. While the R-1 district permits lots sizes equal to those found in
the neighborhood a concomitant agreement could be use to slightly
enlarge the minimum lot size to 8,000 square feet.
Recommendation
MOTION: I move the Planning Commission adopt the Findings of Fact as
contained in the April 17, 2008 staff report.
MOTION: I move, based on the findings of fact as adopted, the Planning
Commission recommend the City Council rezone the site from R-1-
S (Suburban) to R-1 (Low Density) with a condition requiring a
minimum lot size of 8,000.
5
• ,••���.��'r' a ..;,�°,c,y� :- .!+v r'i•` ,'5,:e xra7 �'• t- •.F+
.d"• s.• .�` � syr'''•�. ,.04`- ,.i:•9-rw•- �-� '.. r
1 1 .- a
ION
al
bi
�� „�1i^�.roKi�'irt���J-r _ �'': .rl��.-.,., .�7;��Atar•^ •}y'•(
,f r�_���. :i-trf;{!!�f ( trr ^;�rrr.,.ys-."� ,•�,.'' f �� irrs
:x" �S? * hV'''• "�t`i}t Yy,},... E +iY
Y,s
I . �....
- "-:.fi5'€'ar. ,�r� .7*' w:v _ .' �.1 i.✓�:�at-.,�7£iriew,� : 4x� �'a::
p
a I
IN
am
D
\�
1
i C .
- �
Planning Commission Minutes
3/20/08
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
A. Special Permit R-S-1 Suburban Residential) to R-1 (Low
Density Residential) (All Pro Contracting
3300 Block of W. Wernett MF#Z08-001
Chairman Samuel read the master file number and asked staff for a report.
Staff stated that notice of the hearing was published in the newspaper and
mailed to surrounding property owners.
Staff provided an overview of the proposed project and its location, which is a
rezone of just over 5 acres from R-S-1 to R-1. Staff provided a description of
existing densities and parcel sizes in the immediate vicinity of the proposal. It
was pointed out that the Newton Addition to the southwest of the site was
developed with 7,200-square-foot lots and several duplex units are adjacent the
site.
Staff reviewed the written report for the benefit of the Planning Commission and
explained that the Commission could consider a concomitant agreement to set
the minimum lot size larger than what is allowed in the proposed zone. Staff
suggested that 8,000 sq. ft. as opposed to 7,200 sq. ft. which would lower the
density, yet provide enough lots to cover need improvements in the future
including a sound wall along the freeway.
Commissioner Little asked if this rezone would allow duplexes.
Staff stated that it would not.
Commissioner Schouviller asked if there would be any conditions on square
footage of homes to be built in the area.
Staff explained that law prohibits the City from specifying square-footage
requirements. Only lot sizes can be a condition with a concomitant agreement.
Commissioner Little asked whether there would be noise problems with a
subdivision along the freeway.
Staff explained that this would be a legitimate question at time of a subdivision
review.
Staff also stated that because the rezone would go from 10,000 sq ft lots to
7,200 sq ft lots that there would not be a significant change in the number of
lots that could be developed. However due to the cost of development the
additional lots would make a project more feasible. Development would help
keep the site clean and orderly.
Commissioner Schouviller asked if any road improvements would be required
along Wernett.
Staff explained that this would also be an issue for subdivision review. At the
time of development the developer would have to provide the necessary right-of-
way and complete road improvements such as curb, gutter, sidewalk, etc;
including fire hydrants.
Commissioner Rose asked how much of the road infrastructure would have to
be built prior to construction of homes.
Staff explained that all infrastructure improvements would either have to be
built or bonded for prior to final plat approval. The issues of a subdivision
should not be the focus of this meeting, but rather the criteria for approving a
rezone.
Chairman Samuel opened the public hearing.
Arnold Haag, 4514 W 9th, Kennewick, spoke in favor of the proposal. He stated
that the rezone would create additional opportunities for additional housing.
Development of the property would not be a feasible project without the
additional lots.
Commissioner Schouviller asked what price range of homes or types of homes
would be built.
Mr. Haag stated that the homes would range from $110,000 to $145,000. And
that the houses would range in size from 1,200 to 1,700 square feet.
Arie McReynolds, 2220 RD 34, Pasco, WA stated he had lived in his home for
more than 25 years. The Duplexes across the street have been a problem for the
neighborhood. He gave a brief history of development of Newton Addition. Mr.
McReynolds felt the rezone would permit more houses and the additional lots
would degrade the neighborhood. He felt that the subdivision and rezone should
be done at the same time. He explained that the site had been well cared for. He
stated he was not able to support the rezone without knowing the design of the
subdivision.
Commissioner Little asked how he liked living on a smaller lot.
Mr. McReynolds stated he has gotten used to living on it, but feels that it is a
little small.
Commissioner Little asked if there has been a lot of turnover on the smaller lots.
Mr. McReynolds stated no.
Lonnie Haag, 2016 Rd 44, owner of All Pro Contracting stated he lives close to
the area. Also, that without the rezone, development of this property is not
feasible due to the high cost for infrastructure. He will probably build homes
starting at 1,200 square feet for $135,000 up to 1,600 square feet for about
$160,000. Mr. Haag did not believe the additional lots would create a traffic
issue for this area.
Chairman Samuel closed the public hearing.
Staff stated that County Regulations used to allow lots to be reduced in size if
water and sewer were available regardless of zoning restrictions. Newton's
Addition was developed with 7,200 square feet because water and sewer were
available at the time of development.
Commissioner Schouviller asked about restricting lots sizes to 8,000 square feet.
Staff explained that through a concomitant agreement the lot sizes could be
restricted.
Commissioner Hayes moved, seconded by Commissioner Schouviller, that the
Planning Commission close the public hearing and schedule it for deliberations,
adoption of findings of fact, conclusions, and a recommendation for the City
Council for next Planning Commission meeting. The motion was approved
unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes
4/17/08
OLD BUSINESS:
A. REZONE R-S-1 (SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL) TO R-1 (LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) (ALL PRO
CONTRACTING) (3300 BLOCK OF W WERNETT
(MF #Z08-0011
Chairman Samuel introduced the item and explained that it had been presented
at the last meeting and public comment had been received at that time. No
further public comments will be taken during the deliberations.
Chairman Samuel asked if there were any comments from staff.
Staff explained the concomitant agreement restricting the proposed rezone to
8,000 square foot lots.
Commissioner Little asked if there would be a sound wall along the freeway.
Staff explained that would be a recommended condition for approval of a final
plat.
Commissioner Hay moved seconded by Commissioner Anderson that the
Planning Commission adopt the findings of fact as contained in the April 17,
2008 staff report. The motion was unanimously approved.
Commissioner Hay moved based on the findings of fact as adopted seconded by
Commissioner Anderson that the Planning Commission recommends the City
Council rezone the site from R-S-1 to R-1 with a condition requiring a minimum
lot size of 8,000 square feet. The motion was approved unanimously.
Staff noted the recommendation would go to the City Council for action on May
5, 2008. If an appeal is filed, there will be a closed record hearing by the City
Council before any action is taken.
AGENDA REPORT NO. 15
FOR: City Council May 1, 2008
TO: Gary Crutchfi 1 anager REGULAR: 5!5/08
FROM: David 1. McDo ald, City Planner'.
SUBJECT: CODE AMENDMENT-Driveway and Sidewalk Standards (MF #CA-08-001)
I. REFERENCE(S):
A. Proposed Ordinance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , amending PMC Title 12
dealing with sidewalks and driveways and, further, to authorize
publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. At their regular meeting of March 20, 2008 the Planning Commission held a
workshop to discuss the need for updating the city's driveway standards. Following
a public hearing on April 17, 2008 the Planning Commission made a
recommendation to the City Council for amendments to the standards.
B. The Planning Commission recommendations are contained in the proposed
ordinance Attachment to this report.
V. DISCUSSION:
The current sidewalk and driveway standards contained in PMC 12.04 were enacted in
1969. A few minor amendments have been made since 1969, but the code standards have
essentially remained the same for 39 years.
While the sidewalk and driveway standards have remained constant for many years, the
size of service vehicles and freight trucks and the number of personal vehicles in use
have changed in size or increased in number. As the number of vehicles has changed per
household there has been a corresponding change in the way houses are built. Forty years
ago single-car and 2-car garages were the norm. Today many homes are constructed with
3-car garages and occasionally with 4-car garages.
The proposed code amendments are designed to address the changes in driving habits and
vehicle sizes as well as taking care of a number of housekeeping issues related to the
administration of the code.
The proposed code amendments were reviewed during a Council workshop on April 28,
2008.
8(b)
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE amending Title 12 dealing with sidewalk and driveway
improvements.
WHEREAS, cities have the responsibility to regulate and control
the physical development within their borders and promote the public
health, safety and welfare; and,
WHEREAS, driveways provide access points to private property
and control turning movements on and off public streets; and,
WHEREAS, the proper location of driveways can aid in the efficient
movement of traffic on city streets, lessen congestion and enhance the
safety of motorists and pedestrians; and,
WHEREAS, the public streets are designed to contain primarily
street drainage only, therefore it is necessary to limit drainage from hard
surfaces of private property such as from driveways; and,
WHEREAS, the unmanaged placement and size of driveways limits
the availability of on-street parking, creating potential for neighborhood
conflicts; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that to protect public
infrastructure, avoid neighborhood conflicts and further the purposes of
maintaining the public health, safety and welfare of the community, it is
necessary to amend PMC Title 12;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PASCO, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That section 12.04.010 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and
the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.010 SCOPE OF C14 A v-rEv PURPOSE. it is the pufpese of this ehaptef
the City, btA shall net alteF of affiac4 these eafbs, sidewalks and driveways pfesendy i
e?iistefiee. In the evefft, > > sidewalks and
cmve'V4uy-,7--r'3re te---v°c---anef @d,—fnevrrrccr-vF Ehmigcc, the-n- ssii tef$crvrr
medifieafie > > or- rahange shall be in aeeor-danee v4th the previsions he
The purpose of the chapter is to establish provisions for the uniform
development and construction of curbs, sidewalks and driveways within the city.
1
S
Section 2. That section 12.04.020 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same
is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.020 DEFINITIONS. (a) "Abutting property" means all property having a
frontage on a public street right-of-way. the sidewalk mar
plaee— (b) "Commercial driveway use" means any driveway intended to serve
property located in a commercial or industrial zoning district. legally !efle , being used
for business commercial or industrial purposes.
(c) "Residential driveway" means any driveway intended to serve
propejjy located in a residential zoning district or propcqy actually being, used for
residential purposes. for-use by the eeraupant as a6eess te his prepeft�.
(d) "Residential " means any prepefty, either- zoned or- aeWally being used
(e) "Sefviee driveway" fneans any driveway if4ended for- use by the publie a-s
(#)(d) "Sidewalk" means a walkway improved with concrete or
other approved material located in the public right-of-way generally parallel to erg
pfivate abutting property for pedestrian use.
(e) "Public Right-of-Way" means any publicly owned land set aside and
dedicated for surface transportation purposes, includinp, vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian
transportation, whether improved or unimproved.
Section 3. That section 12.04.030 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same
is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.030 PdGuT OF ABUTTERS RESPONSIBILITY OF ABUTTING PROPERTY.
Any All abutting property owners are responsible for ewaer °r ,.,,...,,..s are grai4ed the
fight to constructigg sidewalks, handicapped ramps, crosswalks, curbs, gutters or
driveways along the entire frontage of the abutting_property in f ent of their- pr-e er-t..
when ,.,ns&- et°a in conformity with this chapter, and the city's current standard
specifications. sueh 1 a regulations as , be pr b a frem time time by the
Eity CeUH617
Section 4. That section 12.04.040 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same
is hereby repealed:
17 0 4.04 0 TA4-UT?���49NT-S TO BE CONCRETE CUPERiTTC T_f-lAT All tmeti�.,
rc,. crcar��.ru All
eonerete as -hereh}a€ter- spec-if-red—afid shall--be—constnie-ted--under- ............w..
Section 5. That section 12.04.050 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same
is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.050 PERMIT REQUIRED. Before any person, firm or corporation commences to
improve or modify any e€the public right-of- s4eet° or all ° within ee-perate 1:.,,it°
2
of the City by the °r°� a construction of sidewalks, handicapped ramps, crosswalks,
curbs, or driveways, or to do any work in or upon the public right-of way s1feets and
alleys whatsoever, the applicant he or- must first obtain a right-of-way permit from
the City Building laspeeie r.
or- alley within t re-eerperate-limits of the City when the gFade has been
zscc blish c°d. or while a propesition to alter er- amend the gr-ade thereef is pending befe�
the City C '1, ,7 after- the City C b it has + .l a petition, adopted a r-eseltition
> and ne pefmit shall be >
f
to e3iisting of d ono- of streets alleys in the o.l:�+o
vir.inity of the proposed ifapr-evements.
Section 6. That section 12.04.060 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same
is hereby repealed:
12 04 060 RECORD OF PERA41T REQUIRED. it shall be the duty of the City
Building T + + keep a a e f all 0.m:tn issued fA-r nano+n,n_t+�.+ under-
. tL,o
cavaa ,av
a whieh r-eeer-ds shall show the date of isstie thereof-, to whem
issued, a desefiptien of the prepei4y ifa &ant of whieh the impfevement made, the
> and an estimate of the quanfit� of >
fees > afid whea aecepted by the City Building inspereter-, and the date of surah
aeeeptanee.
Section 7. That section 12.04.070 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same
is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.070 PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE. The permit fee for a right-of-way permit shall be
the minimum fee listed for a building permit under PMC 3.07.030 B) 1) City Building
Table No-3 -A-.
Section 8. That section 12.04.080 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same
is hereby repealed:
12.04.080 SURVEY SPECIFICATIONS. Upon the granting of a pefmit by the-�
Bttilding laspeeter, shall be the duty of this of rse, in eef« ....efien with City
a
eenfeEm. The per-sen or- per-sons per-feffning the weFk shall take proper- pf-ecautiOn tE)
pfeteet the stAes set by the Building laspee4er- or- Gity Engineef, and any and all stakes
le-st Aff. d-ex-St-r-eyed shall be r-eplaeed only by the City Building laspec-4or- of. City Engine
3
Section 9. That section 12.04.090 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same
is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.090 SIDEWALKS - WIDTH All sidewalks in the City
that mei�x be eenstfueted after-the effeetive date of the or-dinanee reedified herein shafl h
tlea. emi-b-integmted A ith the wa4k,
appr-epr-iate mar-king in the eement; a such sidey�,alks in a residential area shall be
five feet in width, ineluding the wi&h ef the eufb, with eN ts pr-evided at least
every faf:ty feet; and in business and indus4ial zones, s W. sid—Liks sh 1 e
the pr- pefty line to the eur-b, with expansien jeints at least every fiafty fee
1) Residential sidewalks shall be five (5) feet in width inclusive of the curb.
2) Commercial sidewalks shall be seven (7) feet in width inclusive of the cur_b.
_Where a commercial sidewalk is offset from the curb by a landscaped planting strip of
three feet or more a commercial sidewalk may be five (5) feet in width. The Public
Works Director or designee is authorized to permit the construction of commercial
sidewalks at variance with the seven (7) foot standard, but in no case less than five (5)
feet under the followin circumstances:
i) where existing conditions may make it impracticable
ii) where there is insufficient right-of-way
iii) where surrounding land uses may require an altered standard.
te be against !he best if4er-est ef the City, the Pimeter ef Cemmun4y Development shall
be authorized to give speeial pefmits fef tffie e-9-p-stnaefien of surah walks after examin
of the premises and determining that the intefes4 of !he City 'Ail! be best sen,ed by
Ring sidewalk eenstme4ien M var-iafiee with this seetio
Section 10. That section 12.04.100 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the
same is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.100 NEW CONSTRUCTION - SIDEWALKS AND CURBS REQUIRED.
Except as provided in Section 12.04.101 whenever a permit is to be granted for new
construction within the City, the person seeking to build such new construction shall at
the time a building permit is applied for, shall also obtain a permit as provided for under
this chapter for the construction of sidewalks, and curbs, on all sides of such property that
may adjoin a up blic street, in conformance with this chapter. hereAith and sue
sidewalks and eur-bs shall emend ibe full distanee that sueh pr-epefty is sought to be
eee*ed as ,. b i!ding situ and m adjei pr-epei4y de ieatea as a pueblo street.
Section 11. That section 12.04.110 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the
same is hereby repealed:
4
12.04.110 DRIVEWAY A V T EtlE
any driveway of the City to be eenstmeted er-r-epair-ed aer-ess of along any sidewalk ef the
City 1 the same shall be upon the level of the sidewalk f e .-ifA not a edi
is u Yvaaaa not rb
Section 12. That section 12.04.120 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the
same is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.120 DRIVEWAY STANDARDS'`UMBER OF DRIVEWAYS PER LOT
All drivewa s shall comply with the respective standard engineering specifications
adopted by the Public Works Director and the following:
A) Residential Driveways:
1 Driveway widths shall be measured at the curb flow line exclusive of
the transitions. Where there is no curb line, the driveway width shall be
measured at the points where the extension of the two outer edges of the
driveway intersect the street right-of--way.
2. Only one driveway shall be permitted for each lot unless otherwise
provided herein.
3. No single driveway shall be wider than 34 feet or 50 percent of the lot
frontage,whichever is smaller.
4. Circular driveways are only permitted on lots with 100 feet or more of
frontage on the street that carries the lot address.
5. The combined widths of all driveways creating a circular driveway
must not exceed a total of 40 feet.
6. Lots with double frontage mqy have a secondary drivewa y off the
flanking or side street but no more than 22 feet in width.
7. No driveway shall be located closer than 25 feet to an intersection of
two streets unless otherwise approved by the Public Works Director or
designee
8. No driveway shall encase a water meter box or irrigation meter box.
9. Driveways must conform to the provisions of PMC 25.70.085 (p). ,
10. Driveways must be positioned to avoid interfering with fire hydrants,
utility boxes and equipment. The cost of relocating any utilities to
accommodate a driveway shall be borne by the permit holder.
B) Commercial Driveways:
1. Driveway widths shall be measured at the curb flow line exclusive of
the transitions.
2. No single driveway may exceed 35 feet unless the Public Works
Director or designee determines a greater width is necessary, based on
one or more of the following considerations:
i) Street classification
ii) Street speed limit
iii) Traffic volume and turning movements
5
iv) Number of parking spaces within the
parking lot served by the drivew�
V) Whether or not the proposed driveway will
serve multiple businesses
vi) Safety of pedestrians and motorists
vii) Type of vehicles typically using the
proposed drivewa
viii) Shared driveway advantage
3. The location and number of driveways permitted to serve a
commercial property will be determined by the Public Works Director or
designee. The determination of the location and number of driveways shall be
based upon the review criteria of PMC 12.04.080 B (2) as deemed necessary
to promote safety to pedestrian users of the public ways, to preclude hazardous
or congestive traffic movements to maintain desirable traffic flow along the
arterial corridors or for any other reason related to public safety. The decision
of the Public Works Director is final unless Lappealed to the Hearing Examiner,
in writing and stating the reasons therefore within fourteen da s of the
Director's decision.
n) n priva4e dr-iveway, net exeeeding t„ „t. fee! ;dtl, shall be pefmit4e
zone.
avenue-,
one sepviee 7 width, ] ,
7 permit, as Eleeffied
ways, to prvelude
.,rter-i l a .-ri&F other r relate to_publie safety. The .�eeisien of tl,°
, ° r-vi
r:t:., and stating the reemqefls thereof_within ten d of the Dir- rater-'s de
, � ° cac.viaivriq.
Section 13. That section 12.04.130 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the
same is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.130 ABANDONED DRIVEWAY - DUTY OF 0ALNE When any
driveway has been abandoned, or becomes unused for any reason, it shall be closed and
the abutting property owner shall replace it with a standard curb and sidewalk constructed
to the city's current standard specifications.
same to the level of the Aoining sidewalk. In the event ef failtff e to do so, the abutting
property owner fails to replace an abandoned or unused driveway with standard curb and
sidewalk, the city may order the curb and sidewalk be constructed as , the pr-eee ur-e stall
6
he the s,rae provided by the laws of the State of Washington. relating +„ the .epair- At
sews
Section 14. That Chapter 12.04. of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the same is
hereby amended to include a new subsection 12.04.135 to read as follows:
12.04.135 EXISTING DRIVEWAYS: Existing driveways that do not conform
to the standards of this chapter or other standards or regglations of the city of Pasco must
be brought into conformance when a permit is issued for work on the affected props
where said work exceeds 33 percent of the assessed value of the improvements upon the
property. Permit applications for any alterations or repair to nonconforming driveways
other than ordinTy maintenance will require the driveway to be brought into
conformance with current standards; Notwithstandinp,, the Public Works Director may
permit the modification or improvement of an existing driveway without full compliance
with city standards where the strict application of the standard would result in substantial
hardship to the property owner pursuant to the review criteria of PMC 25.84.090 (1);
Provided however, the modification or improvement does not impede the movement of
traffic or increase hazards to pedestrians or motorists. The decision of the Public Works
Director is final unless appealed to the Hearing Examiner, in writing and stating the
reasons therefore, within fourteen days of the Director's decision.
Section 15. That section 12.04.140. of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the
same is hereby repealed:
12.04.14 0 SUPERVISION OF CO-N TRUCTION The per-son making ......1-,
> > shall >
eempleted and the fefms set ready for plaeing eener-ete. The City Building laspe
th job a4 the time improvement is aeWally installed.
Section 16. That section 12.04.150 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the
same is hereby repealed:
12.94.150 SAIP14Y $$EGA14TIONS. The eefi4fae4ef o per-son having ehafge e +he
eenswaotion of any stiek impr-evefnepA shall see that geed and sufficient fenees of ba
shall be kept afeund surah work at all times, and a suffiraiem number- of red ligms shal, be,
placed a4 proper- inten,als upon such work during the nigh! time as a wfffiing te all per-son
Section 17. That section 12.04.160 of the Pasco Municipal Code be and the
same is hereby amended to read as follows:
12.04.160 INSPECTION - CONFORMANCE TO PLAN. No improvement will be
accepted until the Goy Building Construction Inspector is satisfied that the work has been
7
performed according to the approved plans, profiles and current standard specifications
ftifnished fib him a +, the lines and ,,,..,de established.
Section 18. That the city clerk shall number or renumber all sections of PMC
Chapter 12.04 for a consistent sequential ordering of all sections.
Section 19. This ordinance shall be in full force and effective after its passage
and publication as required by law.
PASSED this day of 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sandy Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr
Deputy City Clerk City Attorney
8
CITY OF PASCO
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE No. changing amending PMC Title 12 dealing
with sidewalk and driveway construction.
The full text of Ord. No. is available free of charge to from the
City Clerk, City of Pasco (509) 545-3402, PO Box 293, Pasco, WA 99301.
Sandy Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk
9
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council May 1, 2008
FROM: Gary Crutchfi it Manager Regular Mtg.: 5/05/08
SUBJECT: Senior Service Advisory Committee
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Memorandum from A&CS Director dated 04/22/08
2. Proposed Ordinance
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5/05: MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. , reducing the membership of
the Senior Services Advisory Committee and, further, authorize
publication by summary only.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Please refer to the attached memorandum from Stan Strebel, Administrative and
Community Services Director, explaining the current composition of the Senior
Services Advisory Committee. Included with the memorandum is a copy of PMC
Chapter 2.30, reflecting the municipal code provisions regarding the committee.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Given the increasing difficulty of filling the eight appointed seats on the Senior
Services Advisory Committee, reducing the number of seats to five or seven is a
practical way to mitigate the problem. A smaller committee would not appear to
pose a reduction in effectiveness, as there already exists a strong Senior Citizens
Association (private, non-profit association) which is very capable of expressing
issues on behalf of Pasco seniors. Thus, the City's advisory committee acts more
as a filter for those issues relating to City facilities and/or policies; as such it
would not appear to require nine seats and should be able to fulfill its mission
with five or seven seats.
B) Staff recommends City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance, providing for a
committee of either five or seven members.
8(c)
PASCC C1-i-Y HALL
F F(CFIvr
MEMORANDUM APR 22 2008
CITY IIOANACER'S
TO: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager OFFICE
FROM: Stan Strebel, A i live and Community Services Director
DATE: April 22, 2008
RE: Senior Services Advisory Committee
Chapter 2.30 of the PMC establishes the Senior Services Advisory Committee (see attached) at
nine members, eight of which are appointed by the Mayor. One seat on the committee is
allocated for the President of the Senior Citizen Association. Additionally, there is a City
Council liaison, so the size of the group is ten, plus staff.
Over the last several years, it has grown more difficult to find citizens willing and interested in
serving on the Advisory Committee. This fact, coupled with the fairly large size of the
committee, suggests that it may be prudent to reduce the size of the committee.
There are currently two incumbents on the committee, plus the Senior's President, so there
would seem to be plenty of flexibility in making a restructuring decision. Staff is supportive of
reducing the size to either five or seven. A five member committee would consist of four mayor
appointments. If the committee were reduced to seven,there would be six appointees.
Thank you.
CHAPTER 2.30 SENIOR SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Sections:
2.30.010 COMMITTEE CREATED ................................................................. 25
2.30.020 MEMBERSHIP. ............................................................................. 25
2.30.030 TERM OF OFFICE. ........................................................................ 25
2.30.040 RULES OF PROCEDURE ................................................................ 25
2.30.050 COMPENSATION. ......................................................................... 25
2.30.060 STAFF SUPPORT. ......................................................................... 26
2.30.070 COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES. .................................................. 26
2.30.010 COMMITTEE CREATED. There is hereby created an advisory
committee to be known as the "Senior Services Advisory Committee". (Ord. 3317 Sec.
111998.)
2.30.020 MEMBERSHIP. The Senior Services Advisory Committee shall consist
of nine voting members, eight of which shall be Pasco citizens at least 50 years-of-age.
These members of the Senior Advisory Committee shall be appointed by the Mayor,
subject to confirmation by the City Council. The President of the Pasco/Franklin County
Senior Citizens Association, by virtue of his/her office, shall automatically be a voting
member of the committee and shall serve on the committee during the term of his/her
tenure. (Ord. 3317 Sec. 1, 1998.)
2.30.030 TERM OF OFFICE. Members shall serve for a term of three years or
until appointment of a successor member, whichever is later; provided, however, the
initial appointments shall be for one, two, and three years respectively, so as to create
staggered terms of office with the ultimate objective of having not more than three
terms expire each year. A member absent without prior notification or excuse from
three consecutive regularly scheduled meetings of the committee may be removed by
majority vote of the committee and a new member appointed pursuant to Section
2.30.020. (Ord. 3317 Sec. 1, 1998.)
2.30.040 RULES OF PROCEDURE. At the first meeting of each calendar year,
the committee shall elect its own chairperson and vice chairperson. The committee
shall keep records of its proceedings. A majority of the members of the committee shall
constitute a quorum for its meetings. The committee may establish procedures and
bylaws for the conduct of its meetings and the transaction of business before it;
provided, however, meetings of the committee shall be conducted in a manner
consistent with the Open Meetings Act (RCW 42.17) and records of its proceedings shall
be open to public inspection. (Ord. 3317 Sec. 1, 1998.)
2.30.050 COMPENSATION. Committee members shall not receive any salary or
other compensation for services performed. (Ord. 3317 Sec. 1, 1998.)
PMC Title 2 2/20/2007 25
2.30.060 STAFF SUPPORT. A staff member appointed by the City Manager shall
be the staff liaison officer for the committee and, in this capacity, shall represent the
day-to-day interests of the City as they relate to senior citizen matters. The staff liaison
officer shall serve as secretary for the Committee, including preparation of agendas and
minutes of meetings, and other related clerical duties. (Oord. 3317 Sec. 1, 1998.)
2.30.070 COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES. The senior Services Advisory
Committee shall work with the staff liaison officer to: Act as an advisory body to the
City Council and City Manager on issues relating to senior citizens; provide increased
opportunities for community involvement by senior citizens and the community in
general; and advise the City Council and City Manager regarding the content and
delivery of senior citizen programs and activities. The committee shall perform such
other specific advisory functions as may be assigned to it from time to time by the City
Council. All recommendations of the committee shall be in writing and shall be signed
by the Chair of the committee. (Ord. 3317 Sec. 1, 1998.)
PMC,Title 2 2/20/2007 26
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE reducing the membership of the Senior Services Advisory
Committee.
WHEREAS, the Senior Services Advisory Committee, established under Ordinance No.
3317, provided for a nine member committee to advise the City Council and effected staff
regarding programs and policies associated with services and facilities for senior citizens; and
WHEREAS, applications for appointment to the Senior Services Advisory Committee have
dramatically declined over the past three years, leaving the committee markedly deficient of
membership, quorum and consequential input; and
WHEREAS, in view of the declining number of applicants for the Senior Services Advisory
Committee and the existence of a strong private Senior Citizens Association, the City Council
finds the reduction of seats on the Senior Services Advisory Committee to be an appropriate
method to resolve the membership and quorum concerns associated with the committee while
assuring adequate opportunity for advice on matters affecting Pasco senior citizens, NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DO HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That PMC 2.30.020 MEMBERSHIP be and the same hereby is amended to
read as follows:
2.30.020 MEMBERSHIP. The Senior Services Advisory Committee shall consist of
nine voting members, eight of which shall be Pasco citizens at least 50 years of
age. These All members of the Senior Advisory Committee shall be appointed by the Mayor,
subject to confirmation by the City Council-.1 provided. however, the The President of the
Pasco/Franklin County Senior Citizens Association, by virtue of his/her office, shall
automatically be a voting member of the committee without appointment by the Mayor and shall
serve on the committee during the term of his/her tenure. (Ord. 3317 Sec. 1, 1998.)
Section 2. This ordinance shall take full force and effect five (5) days after approval,
passage and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco, Washington and approved as
provided by law this 5th day of May 2008.
Joyce Olson
Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Debbie Clark Leland B. Kerr
City Clerk City Attorney
CITY OF PASCO
SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE NO. , is an ordinance amending Section 230.020 "Membership" of the
Pasco Municipal Code.
• This ordinance reduces the number of voting members serving on the Senior Services
Advisory Committee from nine to ;
The full text of Ordinance No. is available free of charge and will be mailed
(electronically or via postal service) to any person who requests it from the City Clerk of the City
of Pasco (509)545-3402, P. O. Box 293, Pasco, Washington 99301-0293.
Sandy Kenworthy, Deputy City Clerk
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council April 22, 2008
FROM: Gary Crutchfi anager Workshop Mtg.: 4/28/08
Regular Mtg.: 5/5/08
SUBJECT: Council Goal
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
4/28: Discussion
5/5: MOTION: I move to approve Resolution No. , establishing primary
goals for the city for calendar years 2008-2009.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) Over the past 18 years, City Council has conducted biennial retreats in the spring of
each even numbered year (following the municipal election in the odd number
year). The purpose of the retreat is to consider the community input along with staff
advice and develop a list of specific and measurable goals to be pursued by the city
organization over the ensuing two years.
B) The Council conducted its retreat on April 18 & 19 following a Community Forum
to collect community advice on February 21. The result of the retreat is reflected in
the proposed resolution.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) Approval of the resolution will formally establish the list of goals as the primary
work plan for the organization over the ensuing two years. It will be reflected in
budget recommendations as well as day to day administrative actions, all designed
to achieve those goals before the next biennial retreat (spring 2010).
8(d)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION establishing primary goals of the City of Pasco for the
ensuing calendar years 2008-2009.
WHEREAS, the City of Pasco organization desires to focus the allocation of its resources
toward primary goals selected to fulfill the vision of Pasco's future, as held by its elected
representatives; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a Community Forum on February 21, 2008 to
elicit the concerns of residents about the present condition of the city, as well as thoughts and
suggestions for Pasco's future; and
WHEREAS, the city collected citizen opinion about many city conditions, services and
characteristics as well as certain policy questions by way of the 2007 National Citizen Survey
conducted in November 2007; and
WHEREAS, the city managerial staff has shared with the City Council its concerns for
the present as well as visions for the future of the Pasco community; and
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a goal setting retreat on Saturday, April 19,
2008 to discuss all the various concerns for.the present as well as visions for the future;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS.
Section 1. That the following goals shall be considered primary goals for the City of
Pasco for the ensuing two years (calendar years 2008 and 2009);
■ Industrial Development: the Pasco community and its public school district rely on one
of the lowest "per capita" assessed value (total taxable property value) in the state. The
recent surge in residential growth has increased demands particularly on the school
district, without correspondingly sufficient increases in property tax base. The City will
work with the Port, TRIDEC and other entities to foster more industrial
development (rather than residential), thus increasing the non-residential tax base and, in
turn, expanding the school district's financial capacity. The City will focus particular
effort in the following geographic areas:
o Heritage Industrial Center: approximately 600 hundred acres of land lying
south of East "A" Street is classified for industrial use. The City will work with
other entities, particularly the Port and BNRR, to assure rail service is available to
future industries and will assure appropriate transportation and utility
improvements are completed.
o Foster Wells Area: approximately 400 hundred acres of land lying east of SR-
395 between Hillsboro and Foster Wells is served by an interchange and zoned
for industrial use. The City will collaborate with other entities, particularly grant
agencies and affected property owners, to extend Commercial Avenue and
associated utilities north to Foster Wells Road, thus fostering industrial
investment in the affected lands.
o SR-12 Corridor: substantial acreage along the SR-12 corridor between SR-395
and the Snake River Bridge is zoned and available for industrial use. WSDOT is
planning to study the possibility of an interchange near the Snake River Bridge.
The City should assure the utility and transportation system will accommodate the
industrial potential of the SR-12 corridor.
• Emergency Communications: for more than 30 years, the City has relied on the
Franklin County Sheriff for emergency communications services (police and fire). The
aging communications equipment and constrained VHF radio frequencies, combined with
the rapid physical expansion of the City, present an increasingly ineffective and
potentially dangerous communications system for the City's emergency service personnel
and, in turn, Pasco's citizens. The City will employ an appropriate consultant,
analyze its options and complete implementation of a definitive action plan to
upgrade the City's emergency communications system.
• Public Safety Building: the explosion of residential growth in the City over the past
decade has led to a rapid increase in City staff, necessary to sustain and improve
municipal services. The Police Department is now over-crowded and the Municipal
Court lease at the Franklin County Courthouse will expire in 2012; construction of a
"public safety building"to house both functions will solve immediate space problems and
concurrently provide long-term solutions for the balance of City Hall space needs. To
that end, the City will complete design of a public safety building on the City Hall
campus and approve a funding plan for construction to commence not later than
2011.
• Road 68 Congestion: the extent and nature of urban growth on the plateau, combined
with the limitations imposed by the current configuration of the Road 68 interchange at 1-
182, have led to a pattern of intolerable congestion at the intersection of Road 68 and
Burden Blvd. The City will develop (and formally adopt) a long-range plan to
relieve the growing congestion problem associated with the Road 68 corridor north
of 1-182.
• Lewis Street Overpass: the underpass (now 70 years old) is showing signs of
deterioration, posing an eventual threat to public safety as well as potential harm to the
BNRR system extending over it. A replacement overpass has been planned, representing
not only a solution to the public safety and railroad integrity concerns but a significant
positive influence for downtown revitalization as well; however, the project cost ($15
million) is well beyond the City's financial capacity. Because it is an essential public
facility, the City will complete preliminary design of the overpass and diligently
pursue federal and state funding assistance for the project.
Primary Goals—2008-2009
Page 2
• UGA Development Standards: development within the City's boundaries must comply
with the City's urban development standards; Franklin County, responsible for managing
urban development in the unincorporated portion of the Urban Growth Area (UGA), does
not apply Pasco's standards. Consequently, portions of the UGA are being developed in
a fashion which, after annexation, will require additional public (taxpayer) expenditures
to correct the urban development deficiencies permitted by Franklin County. The City
will make every effort to establish an agreement with Franklin County whereby the
County will apply Pasco development standards within the UGA.
• City Aquatics Plan: the three swimming pools owned and operated by the City are in
need of complete renovation or replacement, either of which is expensive. The 2007
Citizen Survey reflected strong citizen support for the notion of developing a
contemporary water park and a study committee of Pasco citizens recently recommended
that such a water park be established on the plateau and that Memorial Pool be renovated.
Given the extreme age and obvious deterioration of the existing public pools, it is
imperative that a solution be implemented soon; thus, the City Council will complete its
consideration of options, adopt a City action plan for aquatics facilities and
implement it.
• Utility System: with the rapid expansion of the City on the plateau and an official
population projection of 87,000 in 2027, the Franklin County Commission recently
expanded the City's Urban Growth Area (UGA) to the northwest and further expansion
to the northwest is expected as time goes by. To fulfill the City's obligation to prepare
for extension of urban services, particularly utilities, the City will adopt updated water
and sewer system plans to reflect the anticipated growth patterns.
• Regional Centers: each of the Tri-Cities (Kennewick, Richland and Pasco) has created
its own public facilities district (authorized to develop and operate "regional centers",
such as convention centers, stadiums, performing art centers, etc.); however, none of the
PFDs possesses the financial capacity to individually finance the scale and variety of
regional facilities which would improve the quality of life within the region. It is the
express intent that Pasco continue to work collaboratively with its neighboring cities
to jointly plan for development of "regional centers" through existing PFDs and
other appropriate mechanisms.
• Broadmoor Interchange: in view of its geographic setting in the region and its ease of
access afforded by the adjacent I-182 freeway, the vacant and underutilized lands north of
the Broadmoor interchange present great potential for regional scale development. The
City will complete a strategic development plan for the Broadmoor interchange area
and surrounding urban lands and market it for implementation by the private
sector.
Primary Goals—2008-2009
Page 3
• Neighborhood Improvement Action Program: many older Pasco neighborhoods show
signs of aging, in the form of deteriorating infrastructure and, in some cases, substandard
streets and significant gaps in the sidewalk system. These physical conditions tend to
have a deleterious effect on the quality of life in those neighborhoods and can adversely
affect associated property values. Working with individual neighborhoods to define
appropriate improvements, the City will foster code compliance and improvement
of neighborhood infrastructure while minimizing impact on low income households.
• ' Downtown: as have many older urban centers, the downtown business district continues
to struggle in its effort to revitalize itself. Generally, Pasco citizens want to see a more
active effort by the City to foster improvement of the downtown business area. To that
end, the City will formally adopt a definitive action plan for City involvement in
revitalization of downtown Pasco.
• Corridor Enhancement: more than a decade ago, the City approved a "Gateways and
Corridors" enhancement plan, but has implemented only two of the projects
recommended by it. In conjunction with new residential development on the plateau, the
City has established a contemporary standard for arterial corridor enhancements and the
2007 Citizen Survey reflected strong citizen support for the use of public funds to
enhance the older corridors in the City. The City Council will approve an updated
"Corridor and Gateway" enhancement plan, to include potential undergrounding of
associated overhead utilities, and begin implementation of the plan.
• Rivershore: over the past decade the City has made notable improvements along its
shoreline, lowering the levees and widening the pathway so citizens of all ages can enjoy
the Columbia River. Yet more can be done to foster more use of the shoreline and take
better advantage of the unique asset the river represents. To that end, the City will
update its "master plan" for rivershore improvement.
Section 2. The City Manager is hereby directed and authorized to formulate appropriate
implementation strategies to achieve the goals set forth hereinabove, consistent with
appropriation policies and procedures.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco at a regular meeting this 5th day of
May 2008.
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandy Kenworthy Leland B. Kerr
Deputy City Clerk City Attorney
Primary Goals—2008-2009
Page 4
AGENDA REPORT NO. 20
FOR: City Council April 30, 2008
TO: Gary Crutch�`p'�` ger
Robert Albe ( u 1 orks Director
FROM: Michael McShmty Engineer Regular Mtg.: 05/05/08
SUBJECT: Award 2008 Sewer Lining Project, #08-1-04
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Bid Summary
2. Vicinity Map
It. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
05/05: MOTION: I move to award the low bid including alternate area 4 for the 2008
Sewer Lining Project, #08-1-04 to Insituform Technologies, Inc., in the amount of
$409,725.98, including tax, and further, authorize the Mayor to sign the contract
documents.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Public Works - Sewer Fund
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) On April 30, 2008, staff received two (2) bids for the 2008 Sewer Lining Project,
#08-1-04. The low bid, including all applicable alternates and tax, was received
from Insituform Technologies, Inc. in the amount of $409,725. The second bid
received was in the amount of $419,972.24. The Engineer's Estimate for the
project is $431,955.63.
V. DISCUSSION:
Staff previously evaluated the condition of existing sewer mains to determine pipes
in need of rehabilitation or repair. Sewer lines throughout the city have been
identified and prioritized based on the condition of the pipes. Over the past three
years, the program has lined approximately 38,300 linear feet of 8" through 15"
sewers and is anticipated to continue for the next 5 years as outlined in the Capital
Improvements Plan.
The scope of work for the 2008 Sewer Lining Project includes lining of
approximately 10,100 feet of 8-inch (Base Bid), and 890 feet of 15-inch sewers
(alternate area 4) in the area shown. Staff has recommended the selection of
alternate 4 due to the larger size of the pipe in that area. The project also identified
additional 8, 10, and 12 inch pipes in alternate areas which will be lined in future
projects due to budgetary constraints.
The budget for the 2008 project was reduced as Council approved a portion of the
funds be used on the previous years project which was bid at the end of 2007 and is
nearing completion. The remaining budget for 2008 is approximately$400,000.
Staff recommends award of this contract to Insituform Technologies, Inc. and an
additional $15,000 be added to the supplemental year end budget.
1Q(a)
City of Pasco
2008 Sewer Lining
Project No. 08-1-04
April 30, 2008
BID SUMMARY
Total
Engineer's Estimate $431,955.63
1. Insituform Technologies, Inc. $409,725.98
2. PEC, Inc. $4193972.24
v
F ! FaYsrr. . �` ♦���4 � � y
1�. * is •��.y�.�`'w�:,
`ttu ' •aM,k
I!t iy• /.r � I � � M!" .. •�E fRr� , t:l.��. ri �''", ,�•. +i•,'z �'�X�t♦ +`
MW
Ott' "-�i. •:�..a':`� •{��L:..' ,t,.=.:.'1; t � a.R�:.,,♦y � c+�?_,. ., 'r tie. �,6 �C,^e'., .,. ,��
`;,is r a- L 1'':,' .. .`3a :u,�,^p ,'„g�j ��1�•.. ,r ..�,.y�'.1..:•.♦” ��'.. Y[
. r..F,,,.>,;.. �,Sy'rs R:'1i; .�'; r •r,.t gal v,�'• ,•'.t'+ •r.,i } ':,�'•e �xs''' �y'A..,�,♦.,,�at�
P.i' 'i ,!: Y� •tt •+�Z'!•�i ;��,•� .'•,+ .. .;:.��i.i?,,L.�..`T >.'� �' .!� ..3'_ `.?'�r:.a.��,�:
Im �"� r.',' i�e.'r{:s;;tL•. - r���� _ �`•+. 7i; t
' ;'I it.�. 'sQ! �'e►=.w',. .;. �,�� r � +► �.Z � `�' .'•<:�`� •- •�i'' .3'L i�`'fl:,"'tti
` '.!:•:"Jky_U ,� r:+,s,���+:.i+� 7.� ��,,:� S� �.�'•' •. `� �, ,ia•'i•` !:.�` '�.5°'i'd+,:.l:�."'. Fitt��
.).. !�,�, '� t �. Y"-%s'Y:iYti,•i..�, . 1" t:il- y}'•'t�� "e ilir' ♦
sp%t�'�'�,."'.1�,'�r•3+1 .II.i i rs�+':rga•b•�►i•.•.,: . _r, _ k.:s.•:.�+y � :.Y ti.: •r�;n'��'_ ..� :...j + ;
x
i'r;f+Fr ,►r •r. .�? tr,� i,l`,.r'. :i. °i i'[ r.-'.�, %i'�:'�1 __�•.� � {
Ja ;.. , '.''• • = h,.r '.�'w. ,l - -'.�' -... .y,,,' „}'', t" y•"�•'G":�1• as y�'
IP
NN
OL
TW
�,r r< �. ��,4t��;- ' .V•' +;.�i't,t.�"-r' f.•�`+.�,:��-'i•• '�.�'`a• ,� '1Ct:��.1 p;;p.`}i'+ Z♦•,;.:;:w
�'*:."C lti '! ._t ♦.{�:�.•a�G_'. ii ": a.q��°1i�r r�'� i i .}yli�1�7.����• f :.�•'� .'. �i
�!. �,.�'.. .;,:: �. ;R'♦.. ! r r a� ,T ♦, _i. 3 ,-1.I .•.�!Y"s�!`'�r:; 'k f r.•�f,C yam.', '
'f;�•»i �E s• � '`'�,,r''r� r�.�'sl��• •,`�;i.�ii�T E t.'.' a l•; t, '�� w�.''� t",+�'rti,'��l+ly' w�+;�n�r{`,�'. T�t� 'i.•t
iI "� y -1.., i• '`l SoS�:'' '�v"' e o ri'iy;F� ; :�., �► ..
,.; ��: �L•:,,!�_=.�,.,.,..t;x•��1•fl�.a�Ltil r t J' ':. r �Kaitl4i.
�, .,( ��,'�}•�"-a• ,.. ...r� '' •�'-•.'��- =L �.... 3 � ♦ 'F Pis I's� i I�
—am,"
':ws. '4x- jb 1�„ � r< Tt"''1v[.. ... t :,+r""•i'i'+'+"a*'. -..�� 't"" .�i� _
,. •vf'` ri, �' z` I!t ' r f� it "�''�f, '�a° .
' � ••. ct s, !4 i•=.� "':4.Y ��i i i�.r., k.��+ -- ��iji;'
1 , .
,sec � �,, x� � 'l.• ���� „�ra�'���- ' �'���}Y� � r "�Y
� _�'+'i ��•j. ._. 4*4c. , n�^� 1 ql' .�Ei � irk� 7 � � �its,
li� f' '•
k J. y.'p��.s �S µ'O:1 E .�i' r�'�• {'� .r-r i ta.va�k;
ic
Ar
;t � T� x' ',��. � •'t;..•»,..a..•,r., +y.2 rS,>n7G141�.+,,• •r` rte•