HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006.05.08 Council Workshop Packet AGENDA
PASCO CITY COUNCIL
Workshop Meeting 7:00 P.M. May 8,2006
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. VERBAL REPORTS FROM COUNCILMEMBERS:
3. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
(a) Parks & Recreation Interviews:
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated May 4,2006.
2. Applications(3) (Council packets only).
(b) Interagency Agreement for Summer School Services:
1. Agenda Report from Denis Austin, Chief of Police dated April 27, 2006.
2. Proposed Interagency Agreement.
(c) Sewer Connection Fees:
1. Agenda Report from Robert J. Alberts, Public Works Director dated May 3,2006.
2. ULID Graph.
(d) Sale of Personal Property Surplus to City Need:
1. Agenda Report from Webster Jackson,Administrative Services Manger dated May 4,2006.
2. Proposed Resolution.
(e) Street Name Change for Road 68 Place(MF#INFO 06-001):
1. Agenda Report from David I. McDonald, City Planner dated May 3, 2006.
2. Vicinity Map.
3. Letter Requesting Name Change.
(f) Annexation Area "20" (MF#ANX 06-001):,
1. Agenda Report from David 1. McDonald, City Planner dated May 3, 2006.
2. Resolution Establishing Proposed Annexation Boundary.
3. Annexation Petition.
(g) Joint Planning of Regional Centers:
1. Agenda Report from Gary Crutchfield, City Manager dated May 4, 2006.
2. Agenda Report dated 10/21/05.
3. Proposed Interlocal Agreement.
4. OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
5. EXECUTIVE SESSION:
(a)
(b)
(c)
6. ADJOURNMENT.
Reminders:
1. 12:00 p.m., Monday, May 8, Pasco Red Lion - Chamber of Commerce General Membership
Meeting. (Teacher Appreciation Lunch)
2. 10:00 a.m., Tuesday, May 9, Senior Center- Senior Citizens Advisory Committee Board Meeting.
(COUNCILMEMBER TOM LARSEN, Rep.; BOB HOFFMANN,Alt.)
3. 5:30 p.m., Wednesday, May 10, Columbia Park Band Shell - Public Service Recognition Week
Celebration. (MAYOR PRO-TEM MATT WATKINS)
4. 7:00 a.m., Thursday, May 11, Henry's - BFCG Tri-Mats Policy Advisory Committee Board
Meeting. (COUNCILMEMBER BOB HOFFMANN, Rep.; JOE JACKSON,Alt.)
5. 7:00 p.m., Thursday, May 11, Transit Facility - Ben-Franklin Transit Board Meeting.
(COUNCILMEMBER MATT WATKINS, Rep.; MIKE GARRISON, Alt.)
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council May 4, 2006
FROM: Gary Crutchf 1 Manager Workshop Mtg.: 05/08/06
SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Advisory Council Interviews
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Applications (3) (Council packets only)
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCILISTAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
05108: Council to conduct brief interviews with Kenneth Kuklinski, Curt Shaw and
Cheryl Ann Smyth.
III. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The Parks and Recreation Advisory Council is composed of seven members; terms
are three years. The board meets on the 1st Thursday of every month at 5:30 p.m.
B) The Parks and Recreation Advisory Council advises the City Council on recreation
activities and facilities needed in the community.
C) At the present time there are two positions whose terms are expiring:
1. Position No. 3
2. Position No. 5 (Edmon Daniels)
D) General consensus of the Council Screening Committee that Edmon Daniels,
Position No. 5, should be reappointed without interview.
E) After Council Screening Committee review of all applications, the following have
been selected to interview for Position No. 3:
1. Kenneth Kuklinski........................................................... 8510 W. Adams
2. Curt Shaw...................................................................4010 Horizon Drive
3. Cheryl Ann Smyth .........................................................7912 Sunset Lane
IV. DISCUSSION:
A) After conduct of interviews at the May 8 Workshop meeting, it is proposed that
appropriate appointments be made by the Mayor, subject to confirmation by the
Council, at the May 15 meeting.
3{a}
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Councikeit April 27, 2006
TO: Gary Crutch na ger Workshop Mtg.: 5108/2006
Regular Mtg.: 5/15/2006
FROM: Denis Austin, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Interagency Agreement for Summer School Services
L REFERENCE:
A, Proposed Interagency Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5/08:Discussion
5/15:MOTION: I move to approve the Interagency Agreement with the Pasco School
District for summer school services and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the
agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Pasco School District Funds - $ 9,855
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
School Resource Officers (SRO) are full-time uniformed police officers primarily
dedicated to providing law enforcement resource services to assigned schools and
surrounding neighborhoods. The School District has requested an extension of the SRO
services for the 2006 Summer School at Pasco High School. Normally, SRO services are
not provided during summer months. However, for the second consecutive year the
School District has consolidated all summer school programs at Pasco High School,
which places more than 1,600 students at one school. As a proactive measure, the School
District has requested SRO services for eight hours each summer school day. There are
34 summer school days from June to August. SRO's are assigned to work normal patrol
duties when school is not in session.
V. DISCUSSION:
The proposed Interagency Agreement is effective June through August 2006, and
provides one School Resource Officer for the 2006 Summer School. The School District
will reimburse the City for the salary and fringe benefits costs for one officer at the top
salary level for police officer for eight hours during 34 summer school days. As evidence
of their intention to move forward with the proposed Interagency Agreement the School
District has committed funds to reimburse the City for the wages and benefit costs for
one School Resource Officer.
3(b)
PASCO
HIGH SCHOOL
1108 North Tenth Avenue Pasco, Washington 99301 509 547-5581 FAX 509 546-2684
Co-Principals et •'- Dean of Stu
dents
Vice Principe �r' -.. Yr '�•.
Mr.Wayne Barrett g ;` "' _'
Mr.John M.Morgan&Mr.Raul Sital „ i4•Ir.Jim Bonney
y .
Mr.Pete Peterson
Associate Princi ! s :`., `" ;r, l;;;4ztended Day Facilitator
Mrs.Mar aretRosbolt Mrs.Barbara Mannion r ' k:: t`•,::,"r Mr.Rick Venable
Mr.John Jennings
April 24, 2006
- t
To: Chief Denis Austin, Pasco Police Department
From: Pete Peterson, Pasco High School
I would like to request an SRO for the Summer Semester program at Pasco High This year, We will
be expecting at least 1,600 students and having Officer French last year was incredibly helpful.Summer
Semester will Be from June 19 to August 4,with July 3 and 4 off. It will be a total of 34 school days, 8 hrs
a day, and the rate of pay we used last year was $34.90.If you have any questions, please feel free to contact
me at 547-5581, ext. 3829.
Pete Peterson
Assistant Principal
Pasco High School
Equal Qpportunity Emplover
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT
Between
Pasco School District No. 1
And
City of Pasco, Washington
This agreement, pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW is made and entered into by and between the
Pasco School District No. 1, hereafter referred to as the "District" and the City of Pasco, a
municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereafter referred to as the"City."
It is the purpose of this agreement to:
1. Enhance the safety and security of students, teachers, staff, and visitors and provide
patrol of the various campuses of the District located within the City of Pasco,
Washington.
2. Provide for the presence of armed and uniformed City Police Officers both inside and
outside the school buildings on selected campuses of the District during certain school
hours in support of such safety and security and the maintenance of a secure and peaceful
learning atmosphere.
3. Provide for prevention, intervention, and prompt effective enforcement by the City's
Police Department in situations involving,but not limited to:
a. Maintenance of order
b. Use,possession, or sale of illegal drugs and alcohol on school premises
C. Crimes against persons
d. Crimes against property
e. Any other situations or activities which require the intervention of law
enforcement officers; and
4. Provide for participation by police officers in the educational activities and role modeling
to foster and enhance knowledge of and respect for law enforcement and law
enforcement officers by students and the community.
5. Provide positive and supportive interface between law enforcement representatives and
the District's substance abuse and harassment prevention efforts including, but not
limited to Natural Helpers, Student Assistance Teams, Anti-Harassment and Bullying
Project and other intervention and prevention efforts by the District.
It is therefore mutually agreed that:
1. Statement of Work. The City shall furnish the necessary personnel and services and
otherwise do all things necessary for and incidental to the performance of the work stated herein.
The City shall:
a. Station a full-time uniformed police officer at Pasco High School for eight hours
each day during the 34 days when summer school is in session during the months
of June through August 2006.
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No.1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 1 of 5
b. Cooperate with the District to provide training and education to each assigned
officer to insure effective communication and interrelation with the school
community and its students;
c. Cooperate with the District to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the
assigned officers and the program;
d. Meet as needed during the academic year with the District's representative (as
designated by the District)to evaluate the effectiveness of the program;
e. Cooperate with the District's representative to investigate and report on any
complaints regarding the conduct of an assigned officer, share fully, as permitted
by law, with the District's representative all results of such investigations for the
purpose of responding to each complaint and cooperate to resolve each complaint.
Provided, that it shall be the responsibility of the District to respond to any
complaint the District received from a student, parent or patron of the District and
communicate the results of any investigation to such person or persons.
2. Terms and Conditions. All rights and obligations of the parties to this agreement shall be
subject to and governed by the terms and conditions contained in the text of this agreement.
3. Period of Performance. Subject to its other provisions, the period of performance of this
agreement shall commence in June 19, 2006 and be completed in August 4, 2006 with July 3 d
and 4 1 scheduled off, unless terminated sooner as provided herein.
The principal shall be responsible for notifying the Chief of the City's Police Department of the
school calendar, schedule of events and activities, and any changes in the same. The principal
shall determine the specific hours when an officer shall be present within the limits set forth in
Section 1.a. of the Agreement.
4. Payment. The District shall reimburse the City for its expenses in employing one officer for
34 days as follows:
a. For June 19, 2006 through August 4, 2006, an estimated total of nine thousand
eight hundred fifty-five dollars ($9,855).
Actual amount will be determined by the parties based upon any negotiated wage
increase between the City and the police officer's collective bargaining unit. The current
wage rate with benefits is $36.23.
5. Billing Procedure. The City shall submit a monthly invoice or billing statement to the
District. Payment shall be made to the City according to the regular procedures of the District.
6. Funding. If for any reason the District exhausts its budgeted funds for payment to the City
for its services described herein or funds from any expected funding source become unavailable,
the District shall notify the City and the obligations of the City shall immediately cease and this
agreement terminate, unless the district otherwise assumes the obligations for the payment of
services rendered by the Police Department.
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No.1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 2 of 5
7. Non-discrimination. In the performance of this agreement, the District and the City shall
comply with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 200d), Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 USC 7904) and Chapter 49.60 RCW, as now and
hereafter amended. Both shall not, except as they may be specifically allowed by laws to do so,
discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, marital status, age,
creed, Vietnam-Era and Disabled Veterans status, or the presence of any sensor, mental, or
physical handicap in:
a. Any terms or conditions of employment to include taking affirmative action
necessary to accomplish the objectives of this part; and
b. Denying an individual the opportunity to participate in any program provided by
this agreement through the provisions of services, delivery of services
contemplated by this agreement or otherwise afforded others hereunder.
In the event of non-compliance by either party or refusal to comply with the above provisions
this agreement may be rescinded, canceled, or terminated in whole or in part. The non-
complying party shall, however, be given a reasonable time in which to cure this non-
compliance. Any dispute may be resolved in accordance with the "Disputes"procedure set forth
herein.
8. Records Maintenance. The City shall maintain books, records, documents and other
evidence that sufficiently and effectively reflect all direct and indirect cost expended in the
performance of the services described herein. These records shall be subject to inspection,
review or audit by the personnel of both parties, other personnel authorized by either party, the
Office of the State Auditor and federal officers, if any, so authorized by law. The City and
District shall retain all books, records, documents, and other materials relevant to this agreement
for five (5) years after expiration. The office of the. State Auditor, federal auditors, and any
persons authorized by the parties shall have full access and the right to examine any of these
materials during this five-year period.
9. Responsibilities and Authority of School Administrator. The principal or other
administrator designated by the District is responsible for the supervision and daily operations of
the school shall, subject to the lawful exercise of the officer's law enforcement responsibilities,
schedule, assign and direct the officer's duties under this agreement.
The principal is responsible for the investigation of non-criminal incidents that occur at or are
related to the school. If the principal finds that he or she or any individual is in physical danger,
the principal may request the law enforcement officer to assist him or her.
In the case of a search of student property for the violation of District rules or other
administrative reasons, the school principal or designated administrator or District employee will
conduct the search. Once the principal has reason to believe that a crime has been or may be
committed, the principal or other designated administrator shall request the law enforcement
officer to assume responsibility.
The building administrator shall have the responsibility to contact and report to parents and
patrons regarding activities and findings of the law enforcement officer, where appropriate.
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No.1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 3 of 5
10. Indemnification. Each party shall defend, protect and hold harmless the other party from
and against all claims, suits and/or actions arising from any negligent or intentional act or
omission of that party's employees or agents while performing under this agreement.
11. Agreement Alterations and Amendments. The District and the City may mutually amend
this agreement. Such amendments shall not be binding unless they are in writing and signed by
the personnel authorized to bind the District and the City.
12. Termination. Except as otherwise provided in this agreement, either party may terminate
this agreement upon sixty days (60 days) written notification. If this agreement is so terminated,
the terminating party shall be liable only for performance, in accordance with the terms of this
agreement for performance rendered prior to the effective date of termination.
13. Savings. Should any portion of this agreement be declared illegal, the balance of the
agreement shall remain in full force and effect to carry out the purposes of this agreement.
14. Disputes. In the event that a dispute arises under this agreement, it shall be resolved in the
following manner: The Director of Educational Services of the District shall appoint a member to
the Dispute Board. The Pasco Chief of Police shall appoint a member to the Dispute Board. The
Director of Educational Services and the Pasco Chief of Police shall jointly appoint a third
member to the Dispute Board. That person shall act as chairperson, convene the Dispute Board
and cause a determination of the dispute, arrived at by a majority of the Board, to be rendered in
a timely manner. The determination of the Dispute Board shall be final and binding on the
District and the City.
15. Notices. Any notices required herein or related hereto shall be delivered in writing to the
District at:
Pasco School District No.1
Attn.: Director of Student Services
1215 West Lewis Street
Pasco,WA 99301
And to the City at:
Chief of Police
Pasco Police Department
525 North 3 d Avenue
Pasco, WA 99301
16. All Writings Contained Herein. This agreement contains all the terms and conditions
agreed to by the parties. No understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of
this agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties to this agreement.
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No.1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 4 of 5
In Witness whereof, the parties have executed this agreement effective this day of
2006.
City of Pasco: Pasco School District No. 1
Joyce Olson Ricardo Espinoza
Mayor President, Board of Education
Attest:
Webster Jackson Saundra Hill
City Clerk Superintendent
Approved as to Form:
Leland Kerr Sarah Thornton
City Attorney School District Counsel
Interagency Agreement between Pasco School District No.1 and the City of Pasco.
Page 5of5
AGENDA REPORT NO. 14
FOR: City Council DATE: 513/06
TO: Gary Crutch anager Workshop: 5/8/06
FROM: Robert f 1 hector,Public Works
SUBJECT: Sewer Connection Fees
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. ULID Graph
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5/8/06: Discussion: Discuss the current Sewer Ordinance to review the
connection fee policies.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The extension of sewers into existing neighborhoods is typically done either
through a Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) or a City C.I.P. project. The
City of Pasco has a long history of extending sewer pipelines into neighborhoods
using the ULID means of financing the improvements. In a ULID, the property
owner's pay for the costs over a fifteen (15) year period, which includes
engineering, construction of pipelines, resurfacing of the street, and the current
system fee. By including the system fee, the owner is not subject to any increases
when they decide to connect. Financial assistance is also available for those who
qualify to have their ULID assessments paid.
The City extends sewer pipelines through neighborhoods as part of major pipeline
projects or when a ULID is not applicable. The cost to connect to these pipelines
is based on the lot size and the City's current fee structure. The City has strived
over the years to make the connection fees equitable to ULID costs.
In 1996, the typical connection fee to connect to a City installed sewer was $2,500
and $6,000 in a ULID. The City adjusted the connection fees by adding a $3,000
stub fee that increased a typical connection cost to $5,500. The adjustment
acknowledged that the ULID participants had the benefit of having their streets
resurfaced and ULID financing. The fee structure was again adjusted in 2004 due
to rising costs reflected both in City projects and ULID projects. In 2005 the
ULID costs had risen to approximately $7,000 to $7,500. The connection fees
were adjusted to approximately $6,700 per connection. The rising costs were
again made apparent in 2005 with the .formation of ULID 142 where the
preliminary assessment was approximately $9,000. Staff anticipates the final
costs to be between $8,000 and $8,500 which would be consistent with past ULID
history as shown in the attached graph. This also reflects the need to make
adjustments again to better reflect actual costs and parity between connection fees
and ULID costs.
The majority of ULID projects are in neighborhoods with streets built to the old
county standards. As part of the ULID, the streets are resurfaced to City standards
and become eligible for the City's annual overlay problem. This is a good benefit
to both the neighborhood and the City. Sewer projects built through the C.I.P.
programs that include resurfacing the street, increases the cost of the project. The
connection fees do not cover the resurfacing costs. Staff believes a sewer
extension program needs to balance costs, recognizes the general benefit to the
City and identify the City's responsibilities in cost participation.
3(c)
Staff believes the ULID program needs to be promoted where applicable but the
rising costs will make this program less attractive. Staff recommends that the
ULID cost for a typical lot be limited to $8,000 with the City absorbing any costs
above $8,000. Since every ULID has a hearing before the City Council, it would
easy to evaluate this recommendation as time goes on. Staff would also
recommend raising the stub fee from $3,000 to $4,000. This would help account
for street resurfacing costs and raise (for a typical lot) the connection fees to
approximately$7,700.
Staff did inquire with the other cities regarding costs and sewer connection
policies. The City of Pasco is the only city locally that has had an active ULID or
sewer extension program in recent years. There are no cost comparisons. The
vast majority of connections in the other cities are in new subdivisions, where the
developer installs all of the improvements. In these cases, the City of Pasco's
connection fee is approximately $1,700 compared to $3,000 to $4,000 per lot in
the other cities. Staff recognizes that all cities are different and fees are unique to
each jurisdiction. Staff believes the City of Pasco's fees appear to be very fair and
equitable.
With Council concurrence, staff will prepare a resolution for a ULID policy and
will revise the current Sewer Ordinance on connection fees to be brought back for
Council approval.
V. ADMINISTRATIVE ROUTING
Project File
N
° O
J N
r
T
� J
C D
d '
E o
H
Q # j
V �
� r
r
_H D
J �
Z O
�+ Z
C � �
.2
co
E co w
O J
L
CL i
E � M '�
r a
d
w3, a co
/W r
� I J
V Z)
L
O r
N r
I °
J
M
O
co
r
°
0 0 °o o °o o °o °d o do,
d dd °o
d O O O O O O O O
6s
sanleq Iuawssassd
AGENDA REPORT
FOR: City Council May 4, 2006
TO: Gary Crutchfi Manager W/Shop Mtg.: 5/8/06
Stan Strebel, trative & Community
Services Director Regular Mtg.: 5/15/06
FROM: Webster Jackson, Administrative Services Manager
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY
SURPLUS TO CITY NEED
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Resolution
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
518: Discussion
5/15: Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. authorizing the sale of
personal property surplus to city needs.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
None
III. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
The City of Pasco Fire Department has a 1978 and a 1979 Ford Horton Ambulance that is
no longer needed by the department. Both units have been replaced. Also, there is a
collection of miscellaneous items within city departments.that are surplus to city needs
consisting of various file cabinets, desks, printers, etc., of low value. .
No minimum prices are suggested for each of the miscellaneous items, as they are too
numerous. Staff estimates that the total sales price will be approximately $500.00, and is
requesting Council to declare the items surplus to city needs and authorize staff to sell the
items for a price that is in the best interest of the City.
Therefore, staff is requesting Council approval of the action stated in Section II above.
V. DISCUSSION:
To be determined.
3(d)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION authorizing the sale of personal property surplus to City needs.
WHEREAS,there are certain items of personal property surplus to City needs,
NOW,THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, WASHINGTON, DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
The items of personal property listed below are declared surplus property and city
staff is directed to advertise for sale by competitive bid, sealed bid, or public
auction at, or above,the minimum sale price set forth below:
1. 1979 Ford Horton Ambulance. MINIMUM PRICE: $3,000
2. 1978 Ford Horton Ambulance. MINIMUM PRICE: $2,000
3. Several miscellaneous items consisting of file cabinets, desks, printers,
etc. MINIMUM PRICE: $500
In the event the minimum bid price is not received from these items, staff is
authorized to negotiate a sale at a price that is in the best interest of the City.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of May 2006.
CITY OF PASCO
Joyce Olson,Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Webster Jackson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney
AGENDA REPORT NO. 39
FOR: City Council DATE: 5/3/06
TO: Gary Crutchfi Manager WORKSHOP: 5/8/06
Richard J. Smi ector REGULAR:
Community & conomic Development
FROM: David McDonald, City Planner
SUBJECT: Street Name Change for Road 68 Place (MF #INFO 06-001)
L REFERENCE(S1:
A. Vicinity Map
B. Letter Requesting Name Change
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Discussion
III. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. The owners of several parcels of land near the northwest corner
of Burden Boulevard and Road 68 Place have submitted a request to
change the name of Road 68 Place.
B. Building permits have recently been issued for a 12 screen
theater and a 20,000 square foot medical office building which are
both now under construction near the intersection of Road 68 Place
and Burden Boulevard. Additionally, this year it is anticipated that a
dental office will be built on Rd 68 Place north of the medical office.
The owners of the proposed new buildings feel it will be less
confusing for their customers and clients to have their access street
renamed to something other than Road 68 Place. Some customers
may confuse Road 68 Place with Road 68 which is located two
blocks to the west.
V. DISCUSSION:
A number of suggestions have been made for renaming the street
ranging from names dealing with the movie industry to continuing
with the baseball theme of the area. Some suggestions have been as
follows: Cinema Lane, Pasco View, Tucannon Ave, Far West Ave,
Northern Pacific Ave, Triple Play Drive, Baseline Dr, and Blue Sage
Ave.
In keeping with the baseball theme of the area staff recommends the
street be renamed Baseline Drive. Additionally, because Convention
Place is the southerly extension of Road 68 Place staff is also
recommending Convention Place be renamed. Baseline Drive would
then connect with Home Run Road and continue on north along
Sunny Meadows that contains all the baseball related street names.
Once a name is selected Staff will prepare an Ordinance to change the
name. The name should be changed prior to the completion of any
buildings (theater, dental office) that will be addressed off Road 68
Place.
3(e)
VICINITY M
Chancle r i I • Place
MFL Fairchild, Pacileq Mullen
' INFO 06-001
•• C.C� CC_■■mom
C CC �C ��!///1■ ��r
/■■■■ii■■■iiiii!!liir
dr+sa��� � �■■/1111
�' ���f1111111111111f�; .-.■■■■.■■1� �,�,����
IN� �■ ■ii■#■■##i#l■#N!i ■i■ii■■■i#i■l■l� till■ ■■ ■■
ON CC
■■ : , ` . ,,... liiiiii��■�■iiiiii/i� ��111!"�= == C ■■ Ci ■
i# : � � � Illlffilflf�'�1 ._ ��_'�_...is ■ :■
■i■■■lid■■i/- ♦ ::: w's 't ■ ■■ ■
■ ■ . .: c ��r, w ■ !■ ■
ON
.■' • !�rrf ■■�.�.#. 1110100 I 1#i■■■■■! !■iillli . ■■ .■
/■ C % #■■■■■■l 11.11■■ ■■■■■■liii ■■■■■■■■■ ■ ■� �■
1■■ C , . _:,:..:., '1\ � I 111f./l/.r.. ■iii■■■■■�■■a . ; C■ CC
■ �1� ■ ■■
ii ; - 1 � ��'� �■=�—,. :.�.�;mil. 07■.NIf1111111fllfllf ■ � ■■ ■■
4 r / �;: 11 i ■■
/ Illfllll� araP +•r'lii■■■11�1i■i■■■■_• ■ ■■ ■■�
IN
,, . . . ■ ■i■■■■■\�a ■�/fii#!;,1111■■ii■►�:■.■■ ■■
■■ ■ /i � �; ■ ■■■■Ilat#■■■ ii■i■i■i■i ■iii###i■■ii ■ ON ■
NO
ii. �■ ` e '■■■iii■■�■i■i iil##ii■#iii■i>Iilllil■■ ■ ■11�
t �� �' /A�< ■ ■
c
�iot�tstia�is�a
iL tq
OWN'
'st t�i�is
I G' oist�t°�°�ttsts
,,�,t OtlCatit
J & L FAIRCHILD LLC.
2805 CANYON LAKES DRIVE
KENNEWICK, WA 99337
Dave McDonald 12/4/05
City of Pasco
RE: Road name change
Dave
The following property owners and developers are requesting to change the name of Rd
68th place; we feel it would be less confusing not to have Rd 68 and Rd 68th place.
At this time there are no address assigned to Rd 68th place waking this an ideal time to
make the change
Thanks for your consideration
0�'FAIRCHILD
509 750 4230
,)OS
fiaV�j I` u���Q
AGENDA REPORT NO. 40
FOR: City Council DATE: 5/3/06
TO: Gary Crutchfi JhV Manager WORKSHOP: 5/8/06
Richard J. Smector R EGULAR: 5/15/06
Community a conomic Development
FROM: David 1. McDonald, City Planner
SUBJECT: Annexation: Area "20" (MF # ANX06-001)
I. REFERENCE(S):
A. Resolution Establishing Proposed Annexation Boundary
B. Annexation Petition
Ii. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5/8/06 Discussion:
5/15/04 Motion: I move to approve Resolution No. ,
accepting a petition for Annexation Area No. "20" and providing a
determination on the annexation boundary, zoning and
indebtedness.
III. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A. Property owners within the West Pasco area identified in the
attached resolution have submitted a petition (under the 60%
petition method) for the purpose of initiating annexation to the
City.
B. The petition has been reviewed by staff, and it has been
determined that the petition contains sufficient signatures to
initiate the annexation process.
C. The proposed annexation area is on northern edge of the City's
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The UGB is used to identify all
lands that are to be developed at urban densities and that are to
be become part of the City. Properties to the east and west are
already in the City and are in the process of being developed (Three
Rivers Crossing [55 houses] to the west and Northwest Commons
[549 houses] to the east). Properties directly south of the proposed
annexation area (Overton Rd. area) are outside the City but within
the UGB.
D. Annexing the property in question will create an
unincorporated island of the Overton Rd. area to the south of the
proposed annexation area. While it is generally not advisable to
create unincorporated islands, for all practical purposes the
Overton Rd. area is already more or less an island of
unincorporated lands surrounded on three sides by the City.
E. Annexation of the lands along the northern line of the UGB will
help facilitate the extension of utilities to the Overton Rd area. For
example, development of the annexation area will cause water lines
to be extended north in or adjacent the Overton Rd area. These
water lines would be available to serve property owners in the
3(f)
Overton Rd. area. In addition to extending and looping water lines
(for improved reliability in the system), development of the
annexation area will cause the extension of other utilities near the
Overton Rd. area. The annexation area will be served by sewer
from the west in the Three Rivers Crossing development.
V. DISCUSSION:
Upon receipt of a ten percent annexation petition, the City Council
is required to meet with the petitioners to determine:
1) Whether the City will accept or require modification of the
proposed annexation area;
2) Whether the City will require simultaneous adoption of zoning;
and,
3) Whether the City will require the property to assume all or a
portion of existing City indebtedness.
The proposed resolution has been prepared following past practices
of accepting proposed annexation area without requiring
simultaneous zoning or the assumption of bonded indebtedness.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A TEN PERCENT
ANNEXATION PETITION AND PROVIDING A DETERMINATION ON
THE TERRITORY TO BE ANNEXED AND WHETHER
SIMULTANEOUS ZONING AND THE ASSUMPTION OF BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS WILL BE REQUIRED.
WHEREAS, owners of property, generally between Road 52 and Road 60,
as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, have initiated action to annex to
the City of Pasco; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pasco has reviewed the
annexation petition and has determined annexation of the territory would
further orderly growth of the City and is in the best interest of the community;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PASCO, DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
A) That the City will accept the proposed territory to be annexed as
described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
B) That the territory to be annexed will not require simultaneous
adoption of zoning regulations. Zoning will be determined through a public
hearing process with input from affected property owners.
C) That the annexation area will not be required to assume any
portion of existing City bonded indebtedness.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Pasco this day of May,
2006.
Joyce Olson, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Webster U. Jackson, City Clerk Leland B. Kerr, City Attorney.
Exhibit"A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Annexation Area "20"
Beginning at northwest corner of the northeast quarter of Section 10, Township
9 North, Range 29 East Willamette Meridian; Thence east along the north line
of the northeast quarter of said Section 10 to the northeast corner of the
northeast quarter of said Section 10; Thence south along the east line of the
northeast quarter of said Section 10 to the southeast corner of said northeast
quarter; Thence west along the south line of said northeast quarter to the
southwest corner of said northeast quarter of Section 10; Thence north along
the west line of said northeast quarter of Section 10 to the point of beginning.
EXHIBIT B"
VICIITY MAP
ANNEXATION AREA # 20
ruu.rru.u........0
................ CITY LIMITS
CITY LIMIT
ANNEXATION AREA
FUTURE FUTURE.
PHASES
�— NORTHWEST
THREE—RIVER
J COMMONS
CROSSING
H
n i z U
0
0
f_ 0 °�
--i
OVERT ON RD
r
SAND/ A CITY LIMITS
%.......r....ss.r..s..■
SANDIFUR PKWY
JEFFERSON DR FUTURE
CASA DEL SOL
a
(D cV
LO
0 3 z FUTURE PHASES
X—Z in z OF Q
o a VILLAGE AT PASCO HEIGHTS LAREDO OR
U Q
° U m
FFFTPAMPLONA DR
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO COMMENCE ANNEXATION PROCEDURES
TO: The City Council of the City of Pasco
525 North Third Avenue
Pasco, Washington 99301
Council Members:
The undersigned, who are the owners of not less than ten percent in
value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation of the
property for which annexation is sought, hereby advise the City Council
of the City of Pasco that it is the desire of the undersigned owners of the
following area to commence annexation proceedings.
The property herein referred to is described on Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and is depicted on Exhibit "B" further attached hereto.
It is requested that the City Council of the City of Pasco set a date not
later than sixty days after the filing of this request for a meeting with the
undersigned to determine:
(1) Whether the City Council will accept the proposed annexation;
and,
(2) Whether the City Council will require the assumption of existing
City indebtedness by the area to be annexed; and,
(3) Whether the City Council will require simultaneous zoning.
This page is one of a group of pages containing identical text material
and is intended by the signers of this Notice of Intention to be presented
and considered as one Notice of Intention and may be filed with other
pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be
considered as a single Notice of Intention.
1. Please print your name in addition to signing.
NAME ADDRESS DATE
SID we-(6CA Yld 7/0 6,
AMf
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council May 4, 2006
FROM: Gary Crutchfi i Manager Workshop Mtg.: 5/8/06
Regular Mtg.: 5/15/06
SUBJECT: Joint Planning of Regional Centers
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Agenda Report dated 10/21/05
2. Proposed Interlocal Agreement
I.I. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
5/8: Discussion
5/15: MOTION: I move to approve the Interlocal agreement between the cities of
Kennewick, Pasco and Richland for joint planning of regional centers
and, further, authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement.
III. FISCAL IMPACT:
Up to $15,000
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) The background of this matter is summarized in the attached agenda report dated
October 21, 2005. At that time, Council authorized (by general consensus) then
Mayor Garrison to invite the cities of Kennewick and Richland to consider approval
of the Interlocal agreement proposed by Pasco for the region.
B) As a result of the invitation in October last year, representatives of the three cities
met in March 2006 to further discuss the joint planning concept for regional centers
and to specifically clarify the proposed Interlocal agreement. As a result of the
meeting, the cities of Kennewick and Richland have since approved a slightly
revised version of the Interlocal agreement; the changes clarified the need to provide
progress reports to the cities as the project unfolds and to include development of
criteria to evaluate potential sites for future regional centers.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The revised agreement is substantially the same as that approved by the City Council
in October 2005 and the changes do not appear to present reason to withhold
participation. Consequently, staff recommends Council approval of the agreement at
the May 15 meeting. If Council is so inclined, the approval should include a
separate motion to specifically identify the two Council representatives required to
participate in the oversight committee of the process (presumably, Council will
prefer to name the two Councilmembers who have been involved to date,
specifically Mr. Watkins and Mrs. Francik).
3(9)
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council 10/21/05
FROM: Gary Crutchfield, City Manager Workshop Mtg.: 10/24/05
SUBJECT: Joint Planning of Regional Centers
I. REFERENCE(S):
1. Proposed Interlocal Agreement
II. ACTION REQUESTED OF COUNCIL/STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
10/24: Discussion
IH. FISCAL IMPACT:
Up to $15,000 for share of consultant contract
IV. HISTORY AND FACTS BRIEF:
A) There has been considerable discussion in the Tri-Cities community over the past
two years regarding the notion of the community financing a regional "aquatics
center." In fact,the YMCA and other community partners raised $15,000 to develop
a conceptual plan for such a facility and shared it with the community more than a
year ago. Each of the three city councils have passed resolutions in the past which
indicate their general support for the effort.
B) In May of this year, an informal meeting between representatives of each of the three
cities focused on the question of how best to identify regional centers that might be
appropriate for. the Tri-Cities future. The general consensus of that effort was that
the three cities should jointly employ the services of a qualified consultant to carry
out that work on behalf of all three cities. The result is intended to provide a single,
collective view of regional facilities for the larger Tri-Cities community. In
addition, it is hoped that the consultant can assist the three cities in identifying the
best organizational form and strategy to assure fulfillment of the vision of such
regional facilities for the community.
C) The proposed interlocal.agreement has been drafted to reflect the conclusions of the
informal meeting.
V. DISCUSSION:
A) The proposed agreement is clear as to its objectives and the expected timeline and
cost. In addition, the agreement proposes to include an oversight committee
composed of two Councilmembers of each of the cities, with ex-officio participation
by the respective city managers. That oversight committee would work closely with
the selected consultant to assure that the product would meet the expectations of the
contract.
B) The past year of inaction regarding the potential for a regional aquatic center and/or
performing arts center reflect the inability for any one of the individual cities to
accomplish either of the projects. Until (and unless) all three cities commit to a
collective planning effort, the Tri-Cities community (regardless of population size)
will be unable to fully consider the possible addition of such facilities to improve the
region's quality of life. The proposed cost represents, individually, a nominal
investment in such a regional effort.
C) Staff recommends Council indicate to the other two cities that it will enter into such
an agreement if the other two cities are willing to do so as well.
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Pasco, Washington
525 North 3"
Pasco, WA 99301
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF PASCO,
KENNEWICK AND RICHLAND FOR
JOINT PLANNING OF REGIONAL CENTERS
BY THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT entered into this
day of , 2006, by and between the City of Pasco, City of Kennewick, and
the City of Richland, herein after referred to as "Parties" each being municipal
corporations.
WHEREAS, each of the cities being a party to this agreement are authorized to
plan for the provision of recreation, entertainment and other leisure facilities for the
benefit of their respective citizens; and
WHEREAS, each of the Parties has created a "Public Facilities District" (PFD),
as authorized under RCW 35.57, to create and/or operate"regional centers"of substantial
size and as defined in RCW 35.57 and desire that other reasonable, available mechanisms
for the creation and operation of regional centers be investigated and reported upon; ; and
WHEREAS, various segments of the Tri-Cities community have, over the past
two years, expressed publicly the desire for a regional aquatics center, a regional
performing arts center; and other facilities of a regional nature, and
WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that, collectively, they have available greater
resources for the development and operation of new regional centers and can avoid
duplication of costs and the competition of efforts which may otherwise detract from
individual efforts to accomplish such goals•, and
WHEREAS, the Parties are authorized, pursuant to RCW 39.34, to enter into
interlocal cooperation act agreements to make the most efficient use of their powers by
Interlocal Agreement-Joint Planning of Regional Centers
Page 1
enabling them to cooperate on the basis of mutual benefit to provide services and
facilities to best serve the needs of the Tri-Cities region; and
WHEREAS, it is recognized that an essential step in a collaborative effort to
develop new regional centers is to jointly identify potential regional center projects, their
approximate cost and anticipated benefits to the citizens of the Tri-Cities; and
WHEREAS, the information regarding potential regional centers should be
augmented to evaluate organizational options and recommend the preferred method by
which the Tri-Cities could pursue collective financing, construction, operation and
maintenance of such regional centers, and
WHEREAS, the preparation of such a planning study will require specialized
consulting assistance for the identification of such projects, the analysis of costs and
benefits and the most effective methods by which the Parties may jointly realize the goal
of new regional centers.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein, it is agreed between the Parties as follows:
SECTION I
PURPOSE
The purpose of this interlocal agreement is to develop a planning process for the
preparation of a "Regional Centers Plan," identifying and prioritizing the needs and
interests of Tri-Cities citizens for one or more regional centers as defined by RCW
35.57.020, the respective costs and benefits of each identified regional center, process for
evaluating possible sites for proposed center(s), and recommending the most effective
organizational structure and process by which to accomplish the capital funding,
operations, maintenance and ownership of such new regional centers.
SECTION II
TERM
The term of this agreement shall not exceed eight (S) months unless extended in writing
by mutual agreement of all Parties to this agreement.
SECTION III
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
Each party shall:
A) Select and appoint two (2) City Councilmembers to serve on the Oversight
Committee, provided for in Section IV.
B) Provide such information and data it may have to assist in the formulation of
the Regional Center Plan.
Interlocal Agreement-Joint Planning of Regional Centers
Page 2
C) Pay one-third of the actual cost for consulting services secured for the
preparation of the Regional Centers Plan, provided the share of each party
shall not exceed fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000).
SECTION IV
OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE+
The oversight committee shall be composed of two Councilmembers from each of the
Parties: the committee shall be augmented by the City Manager of each of the Parties as
non-voting members. The Oversight Committee shall:
A) Meet as often as it deems necessary and appropriate to effect its
responsibilities under this agreement,
B) Determine the scope of consultant services required and select the preferred
consultant.
C) Provide such information and direction to the consultant as is deemed
appropriate by the Oversight Committee for the preparation of the Regional
Centers Plan, as envisioned by this agreement.
D) Present to the City Council of each of the Parties, bi-monthly progess reports
on the consultant's findings and alternatives under consideration, a draft
Regional Centers Plan and a final committee recommendation for
consideration by each Council.
SECTION V
CONTRACTING AGENCY
To assure a single point of contact and fulfillment of associated legal responsibilities, the
City of hereby agrees to act as the Contracting Agency and to contract
with the selected consultant on behalf of the Parties. Contracting Agency responsibility
shall include the preparation and execution of the consultant services contract and the
appropriate payment of invoices for services rendered in connection with the contract.
The Contracting Agency shall also be responsible to bill the other Parties for
reimbursement as provided in this agreement.
SECTION VI
AUDIT OF FINANCIAL RECORDS
The Contracting Agency shall maintain books, records, documents and all other materials
to sufficiently and properly reflect all expenditures made pursuant to this agreement, The
Parties have full access and right to examine and copy all records of the Contracting
Agency for the respective matters covered by this agreement during any tenn or renewal
of this agreement and for three (3)years after termination.
Interloca!Agreement-Joint Planning of Regional Centers
Page 3
SECTION VII
INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE ACT PROVISIONS
Each party shall be solely responsible for all costs, materials, supplies and services
necessary for their performance under the terms of this Agreement. All property and
materials secured by each party in the performance of this Agreement shall remain the
sole property of that party. Each party shall have full access and use of all data,
information, reports and studies utilized in the preparation of the Regional Centers Plan
which shall, upon adoption, become a public record. All funding incident to the
fulfillment of this Interlocal Agreement, shall be borne by each party necessary for the
fulfillment of their responsibilities under the terns of this Agreement. No special
budgets or funds are anticipated, nor shall be created incident to this Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement. It is not the intention that a separate legal entity be established
to conduct the cooperative undertakings, nor is the acquisition, holding, or disposing of
any real or personal property anticipated under the terms of this Agreement. The City
Managers of each of the Parties shall be designated as the co-administrators of this
Interlocal Cooperative Agreement.
A copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the Benton and Franklin County Auditors;
provided,however, that failure to file shall not effect the validity of this Agreement.
SECTION VIII
ENITIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. All
items incorporated by reference are attached. No other understandings, verbal or
otherwise, in regards to the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist.
Any modifications to this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both Parties to be
effective.
SEC'T'ION IX
APPLICABLE LAW
This Agreement is governed, construed and enforced in accordance with the substantive
laws of the State of Washington. Should any dispute arise concerning the enforcement,
breach, or interpretation of this Agreement, venue shall be placed in Franklin County,
Washington and the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and
costs as additional judgement.
SECTION X
AUTHORITY FOR EXECUTION
Interlocal Agreernent-Joint Planning of Regional Centers
Page 4
Each of the Parties warrants and represents that its representative, whose signatures are
below, possess all required authority to sign this Agreement and such powers have not, as
of the date of this Agreement,been revoked or revised.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement on this
day and year first written above.
CITY OF PASCO
Joyce Olson,Mayor
CITY OF KENNEWICK
James R. Beaver, Mayor
CITY OF RICHLAND
Robert A. Welch,Mayor
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
County of Franklin )
On this day personally appeared before me Joyce Olson, Mayor of the City of
Pasco, Washington, to be known to be the individual described in and who executed the
within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as he free
and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of . 2005.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
Interlocal Agreement-Joint Planning of Regional Centers
Page 5
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
: ss
County of Benton )
On this day personally appeared before me JAMES R. BEAVER, Mayor of the
City of Kennewick, Washington, to be known to be the individual described in and who
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same
as he free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of . 2005.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
ss.
County of Benton }
On this day personally appeared before me ROBERT A. WELCH, Mayor of the
City of Richland, Washington, to be known to be the individual described in and who
executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same
as he free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of . 2005.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington
Residing at:
My Commission Expires:
Interlocal Agreement-Joint Planning of Regional Centers
Page 6